The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGuillaume Durocher Archive
BLM and White Shariah Come to Europe
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Just a normal day in Dijon, France (where you get your mustard).

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

We are living in kooky times.

The European Parliament has voted a pro-BLM resolution affirming a wide array of victimarian concepts (“structural racism,” intersectionality, “racialized persons,” and the very francophone “Afrophobia”). Yesterday’s kooky left-wing meme is tomorrow’s law of the land.

The EU lawmakers cite the fact that:

[I]n the US, black people and people of colour constitute up to 40 % of the incarcerated population, while they represent 13 % of the total population; whereas the rate of mortality in police custody in the US is six times higher for black people than for white people and is three times higher for Hispanic people, as is the use of excessive or lethal force, which has disproportionately affected people of colour . . .

Apparently none of the 400+ elected officials who voted for this have heard of FBI crime statistics, which show that black and Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly the same proportion as the figures mentioned above. In Europe, one finds more and more the same dumb American memes.

Identity & Democracy, the nationalist group in the EU Parliament, tabled its own resolution denouncing antifa, the practice of kneeling, “the iconoclastic and sectarian drift of progressivism, which is reminiscent of the Taliban,” and the deafening silence surrounding the mass murders of Christians in Nigeria and White farmers in South Africa. This text has no hope of passing but has the merit of showing that not all Europeans are complicit in their suicide.

American liberal elites are radicalizing to a truly frightening degree. The attacks against George Washington and Ulysses S. Grant are a sign that now, for the first time, the very foundations of the American nation are being explicitly attacked. America is no longer considered a tragically flawed experiment on the path to redemption, but an intrinsically evil nation which must be wholly upturned.

European governments, while sympathetic to BLM, have in fact tried to prevent the chaos from spreading to our shores. Both British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and French President Emmanuel Macron have affirmed that historical statues must not be taken down in their nations.

Statues of Winston Churchill and Charles de Gaulle, those heroes of the Second World War, have been vandalized. But so far, there has been no mass elimination of statues, with the exception of those of Leopold II of Belgium. That king, who is now condemned for his colonial enterprise in the Congo, has no nation to protect him.

In passing, I note that Leopold II’s Congo embodies everything wrong with European colonialism: a (pseudo-)humanitarian enterprise driven by capitalistic motives (above all the desire for rubber). No one cares that Leopold II exterminated the Arab slave trade which was still thriving in eastern Congo. No one cares that Belgian colonialism spread basic sanitation and health across that vast territory the size of Western Europe.

Actually, there’s a Monument to the Belgian Pioneers in the Congo in Brussels which was setup just shy of 100 years ago. The Monument is a triumph of colonial propaganda, showing the hapless natives being brought to Christianity and into the loving arms of Mother Belgium. On the left is a statue of a Belgian soldier with his foot on a Caucasian man’s face. Written underneath: “Belgian military heroism annihilates the slaver.”

What is the missing word, you ask? “Arab,” which has been chipped out by someone, probably an Arab. I’m not just saying that gratuitously: the Monument is, tellingly, placed right next to the Great Mosque of Brussels.

How times change!

People claim Leopold II killed 15 million Congolese. Given that Leopold’s agents in the Congo numbered in the hundreds, this would entail a genuinely superhuman efficiency on the part of the Belgians. In the meantime, thanks to the aforesaid gifts of Belgian health and sanitation, Congo’s population has risen from 12 million in 1950 to an estimated 101 million today!

Everything is fine except that you are racist.

Anyway, there have been protests and rioting here and there across Europe, including in France. Actually, in France identitarians gatecrashed the BLM protest by flying a #WhiteLivesMatter banner calling for “Justice for the Victims of Anti-White Racism.” Similarly, right-wing counter-protesters protecting the statues have been stronger, particularly in Britain.

In Dijon, the whole world has been amazed by fighting and heavy weapons used in clashes between Chechens and Arabs. Law enforcement fled and the State was powerless. The affair has been solved by a deal sealed between Chechen and Arab representatives in the local mosque. A first manifestation of White Shariah.

The streets of Stuttgart have descended into chaos as various POCs loot things.

Understand that our stupid world is going to get more stupid. There’s really no telling how low we can go. Inequality is a truth too uncomfortable for our comfy postwar Whites to accept. Protect yourself in the meantime and pray for renewal.

Soft men, hard times, hard men, etc.

 
Hide 47 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Wyatt says:

    What the fuck is it with France and being the most anti-American, yet somehow most trashy American conquest of the old continent? Got a fuckin’ Disneyland there, but they still wanna pretend like they’re standing up to the empire and doing good things as Paris burns and the Japanese tourists get depressed.

    • Replies: @fnn
  2. fnn says:
    @Wyatt

    No one is more anti-American (and anti-white) than the Americans. The anti-white ideology that is destroying Europe comes from the Americans and their Jewish masters.

    https://conswede.blogspot.com/2008/07/social-paradigms-shift-eg-our-view-on.html
    https://www.counter-currents.com/2015/10/negrified-america/
    https://www.counter-currents.com/2011/05/american-civilization/

    • Replies: @Wyatt
  3. Après nous, le déluge.

  4. I am always puzzled by “structural racism” and/or “systemic racism”. Structures and systems within our societies were designed for the people in those societies. The Japanese didn’t consult the African tribes on what Japanese society should be, and the Japanese weren’t asked for advice by the African tribes. In (((Europe))) today, those Africans or Arabs who are prepared to be “French” have nothing to complain about. They may be grudgingly accepted as “French” as long as they continue to behave “French” but the bigger question remains: Why are they there at all?
    The Africans or Arabs who have no intention of ever being “French” are in no position to claim “structural” or “systemic” racism, because they want to replace the “French” structures and/or systems with their own. If the Arabs succeeded in replacing the sturcture or system with their own, the Africans would still suffer from “structural racism” and/or “systemic racism”, but it would be in a different form, and vice versa. For this group, the bigger question is not: Why are they there at all? It is: Why are they still here?

    • Replies: @RobbieSmith
    , @anonymous
  5. A DP member (french NatSoc) managed to tag a fresco in a banlieue dedicated to the local negro martyr by writing “vive l’éternègre” on it (long live the eternal negro). : https://eelb.su/index.php?threads/exploit-avant-un-clash-police-supr%C3%A9macistes-noirs-un-democrate-rend-hommage-%C3%A0-la-r%C3%A9v%C3%A9lation-de-l%E2%80%99etern%C3%A8gre-sur-la-fresque-de-saint-adama-%C3%A0-stains.3655/ . The stupid Lugenpresse didn’t even notice that the nigger saint’s image had been vandalized.

    • Replies: @Anon
  6. Anon[240] • Disclaimer says:
    @Swarthy Greek

    DP meaning Double Penetration?

    • Replies: @Swarthy Greek
  7. The idiocies of the metropolis spread to the colonies…

    ***

    Amusing/encouraging anecdote about that monument, when I was there a couple of years ago:

    The inscription “L’héroïsme militaire belge anéantit l'(Arabe) esclavagiste” [Belgian military heroism annihilates Arab slavery] has been scoured of its politically incorrect ethnic component, though amusingly, it appears that some enterprising Belgian shitlord had graffitied in the prior cultural vandalism.

    The photo below that one shows a prominent wall mural in a Brussels street proclaiming the triumphs of African literacy. No surprise #BML would get going there.

  8. @Anon

    DP means Démocratie Participative,which hapens to be the french equivalent of the Daily Stormer. The name is an oxymoron that satirizes the site’s neo-nazi beliefs which are totally opposed to stuff like participative democracy .

    • Replies: @R.C.
    , @fnn
  9. R.C. says:
    @Swarthy Greek

    You’re saying Daily Stormer is neo nazi? On what grounds?
    Excellent article.
    R.C.

  10. We must be mad, literally mad as a nation!

  11. @Curmudgeon

    Blacks are incompatible with civilization.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  12. Wyatt says:
    @fnn

    Fuckin’ Yankees.

  13. Loup-Bouc says:

    Apparently none of the 400+ elected officials who voted for this have heard of FBI crime statistics, which show that black and Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly the same proportion as the figures mentioned above.

    Such specious, faux-“statistics”-assertions’ mushrooming frequency is becoming tiresome, while previously such assertions were merely inflammatory toxic manifestations of rabid bigotry.

    FBI “crime” statistics prove NOTHING respecting the ACTUAL frequency of crimes committed by Blacks, Hispanics, or “Whites.” I have shown so more than enough times in comments posted under Unz Review articles.

    [MORE]

    But, alas, here again:

    (a) Under Paul Craig Roberts;s article, All Races Suffer from Police Violence, Unz Review (3 June 2020), https://www.unz.com/proberts/all-races-suffer-from-police-violence/#comment-3949098 :
    * My comment of June 5, 2020 at 12:41 am GMT (comment # 14)

    (b) Under Ron Unz’s article Race and Crime in America, Unz Review (20 July 2013), https://www.unz.com/runz/race-and-crime-in-america/
    * My comment of June 3, 2020 at 2:09 am GMT (comment # 221)
    AND
    * My comment of February 19, 2020 at 3:05 am GMT (comment # 151)
    * My comment of February 19, 2020 at 10:04 pm GMT (comment # 158)
    * My comment of February 19, 2020 at 10:38 pm GMT (comment # 160) as corrected in my comment of February 19, 2020 at 10:49 pm GMT (comment # 161)
    * My comment of February 20, 2020 at 10:31 pm GMT (comment # 168)
    * My comment of February 21, 2020 at 12:47 am GMT (comment # 170)
    * My comment of February 21, 2020 at 4:21 am GMT (comment # 172)
    * My comment of February 22, 2020 at 11:00 pm GMT (comment # 184) as corrected in my comment of February 23, 2020 at 2:10 am GMT (comment # 186)

    (c) Under Fred Reed’s article, Her Name Is Breonna Taylor, Unz Review (7 June 2020), https://www.unz.com/freed/her-name-is-breanna-taylor/#comment-3957894
    * My comment of June 8, 2020 at 9:24 pm GMT (comment # 236)
    * My comment of June 10, 2020 at 2:12 am GMT (comment # 401)

    Si vous, Monsieur Durocher, avez étudié les statistiques, vous n’êtes pas simplement coupable d’erreur analytique, vous êtes sans scrupules.

    • LOL: fnn
    • Replies: @fnn
    , @fnn
    , @Ano4
  14. Roy Cohn says:

    Tomorrow belongs, tomorrow belongs, tomorrow belongs to me!

  15. Anonymous[237] • Disclaimer says:

    More than ever, I am confirmed in my opinion that Brexit was right, and that the EU is a fundamentally *EVIL* monster dictatorship primarily dedicated to expunging the white race from its homeland.

    The sooner the EU implodes – it surely will – the better.

    • Replies: @anon
  16. anon[402] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    lol, you’re a moron. Continental Europe is bad, but Britain is way worse, British parliament actually held a minute of silence in honour of George Floyd (!):
    https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2020/june/minute-silence-in-honour-of-george-floyd/
    Every subversive anti-white idiocy concocted in the great Satan is taken up completely unfiltered in Britain, and the British “right” has no way of objecting, because it’s so deep into America-worship itself (“muh 2nd world war, muh Anglosphere, continent bad, Anglo liberty and tolerance good, we love Jews and blacks”). As bad as the EU is in its current form, Brexit will do nothing to stop the dispossession of the English, instead it will probably accelerate the process.
    I know a lot of “prole” Brexiteers voted for Brext out of nationalist reasons, but their official spokesmen are pathetic Boomer cucks like this fellow:

    But at least Brexit will have the advantage that British right-wingers can’t blame Britain’s ills on the EU or Germany anymore, maybe this will finally make them face some uncomfortable truths.

  17. Rich says:

    Is cheap labor really worth all this chaos? The Left unleashed this anti-statue dog to motivate it’s dark skinned political base, but they’re finding out the beast will bite its “master”, too. In Wisconsin, crazed bands of leftists and American blacks destroyed a statue of an abolitionist Union general and some abolitionist female, I guess because they were Caucasians. The new campaign to force Yale to change its name will soon gain steam, maybe then these Pale faced morons wake up?

    • Replies: @Vaterland
  18. Exile says:

    People claim Leopold II killed 15 million Congolese. Given that Leopold’s agents in the Congo numbered in the hundreds, this would entail a genuinely superhuman efficiency on the part of the Belgians. In the meantime, thanks to the aforesaid gifts of Belgian health and sanitation, Congo’s population has risen from 12 million in 1950 to an estimated 101 million today!

    Similar to the claims of Jews regarding gas & oven efficiency in WW2. We’ve Noticed an astonishing number of descendants of Holocaust “survivors” in the following decades.

    I’m assuming the Congolese numbers were compiled by the same tribe of (((statisticians))).

    “The Grand Mosque of Brussells.” SMH.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  19. fnn says:
    @Loup-Bouc

    You’re insane. It’s too bad there are no more mental institutions in the West.

    • Disagree: Ano4
  20. fnn says:
    @Loup-Bouc

    Let me try to pull you back from your insanity. Have you heard of the National Crime Victimization Survey?:
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/james-q-wilsons-wise-words-on-crime-and-race/?highlight=NCVS

    ▼Estimating the crime rates of racial groups is, of course, difficult because we only know the arrest rate. If police are more (or less) likely to arrest a criminal of a given race, the arrest rate will overstate (or understate) the true crime rate. To examine this problem, researchers have compared the rate at which criminal victims report (in the National Crime Victimization Survey, or NCVS) the racial identity of whoever robbed or assaulted them with the rate at which the police arrest robbers or assaulters of different races. Regardless of whether the victim is black or white, there are no significant differences between victim reports and police arrests. This suggests that, though racism may exist in policing (as in all other aspects of American life), racism cannot explain the overall black arrest rate. The arrest rate, thus, is a reasonably good proxy for the crime rate.

    Black men commit murders at a rate about eight times greater than that for white men. This disparity is not new; it has existed for well over a century. When historian Roger Lane studied murder rates in Philadelphia, he found that since 1839 the black rate has been much higher than the white rate. This gap existed long before the invention of television, the wide distribution of hand guns, or access to dangerous drugs (except for alcohol).

    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
  21. Ano4 says:
    @Loup-Bouc

    I followed the link to your first comment.

    You did an impressive effort to dispel what you consider as an inadequate use of race crime statistics.

    On the other hand, you also recognize the IQ difference between racial and ethnocultural groups.

    You actually use these differences to explain how these differences help explain different rate of conviction.

    Could you please comment further about how you view the impact of IQ on the crime rate in different ethnocultural and racial groups?

    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
    , @Loup-Bouc
  22. fnn says:
    @Swarthy Greek

    Yes, yes, we all know now that burning, looting and general destruction by the mob is the ultimate form of “democratic participation.” Also censorship has now been proven to be a key component of democracy.

  23. fnn says:

    This *real* post of Loup’s shows him to be (at best) highly eccentric:
    https://www.unz.com/runz/race-and-crime-in-america/ #174

    https://www.unz.com/runz/race-and-crime-in-america/?showcomments#comment-3727928

    TO: Commentator Mike, Re: his reply post of February 21, 2020 at 6:36 am GMT

    How very presumptuous you are. And how very fact-free in your clinging to your biases.

    Though I am 79, I have the health and vigor of a 30-years-old. And my Aikido black belt does not hang on a hook in a back closet.

    Still, now, as I near 80, I can walk fearlessly into any Black Ghetto bar and win every pool game — and blues-dance hot with the best big mamas — just as I did 60 years ago in the Hi Ho Bar back in Philly.

    I know a good surgeon who would render you a brain-transplant, buddy.

    Cheers.

  24. Loup-Bouc says:
    @Ano4

    You asked:

    Preface:

    Because of professional obligations, I lack time enough to proofread this reply. I type very badly. I commit typing/editing errors. I apologize for any typing or editing error I commit.

    =========

    Could you please comment further about how you view the impact of IQ on the crime rate in different ethnocultural and racial groups?

    I will address that question after I treat other aspects of your comment.

    You wrote:

    You did an impressive effort to dispel what you consider as an inadequate use of race crime statistics.

    If you intended every word-couce that produced your above-quoted sentence, then you did not examine sufficienty, correctly, or without bias the evidence and observations I presentd.

    I appreciate and thank you for the calm and civility of your reply-comment.

    But, if you intended every word-choice that produced your above-quoted sentence [“You did an impressive effort….”], then you did not examine sufficiently, correctly, or without bias the evidence and observations I presented in my several comments that I referenced in my comment of June 24, 2020 at 2:50 am GMT (comment # 13 of this thread).

    My presentations do not merely assert what I “consider” illegitimate of the pseudo-“statistical” inferences bigots use to argue that Blacks commit felonies markedly more than do non-Blacks. Nor do my presentations show merely that such pseudo-“statistics” manifest an “inadequate” use of “race crime statistics.” My prsentations show that those pseudo-“statistics” are gravely un reliable and near-wholly invalid and likely cannot be explained by aught other than bigotry.

    [MORE]

    Among the evidences I have presented to show that the pseudo-“statistics” are unreliable even quite invalid, one evidence item was the proven rate of false-convictions — according to one respected and reliable source, up to about 60% of murder convictions and about 36% of rape convictions: Samuel R. Gross, Kristen Jacoby, Daniel J. Matheson, Nicholas Montgomery, EXONERATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES 1989 THROUGH
    2003, 95 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 523, at 529 (2005),
    https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=7186&context=jclc

    I presented also three other sources’ similar showings:
    (1) http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Race_and_Wrongful_Convictions.pdf [specially relevant to false convictions of Blacks]
    (2) https://time.com/wrongly-convicted/ [all “races”/”ethnicities”]
    (3) https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/251115.pdf [all “races”/”ethnicities”]

    Somewhat “less” disturbing statistics obtain from a presentation of a long-time member of the board of directors of the Innocence Project, John Grisham, a famous novelist and attorney. Relying on statistics accumulated by the Innocence Project, Mr. Grisham noted: (a) During the period 1990-2015, DNA evidence led to 2,000 judicial exonerations (judicial judgments of innocense, not merely determinations of convictions produced by invalid process or insufficient evidence). (b) Of those 2,000 persons, 200 were death row prisoners (scheduled to be executed). See https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-grisham-wrongful-convictions-20180311-story.html , which excerpts pertinent parts of Mr. Grishom’s original presentation contained in Mr. Grisham’s Foreword of the book “The Cadaver King and the Country Dentist: A True Story of Injustice in the American South” (27 February 2018), Radley Balko and Tucker Carrington, authors. In a Cato Institute review of that book, the reviewer observes:

    In a nation with roughly two million people behind bars, a conservative estimate of the number of imprisoned innocent people is probably in the thousands, and perhaps in the tens of thousands. * * * The state of justice in Mississippi may have been particularly bleak, but so many of the problems that happened there are not unique at all.

    The book-reviewer was Jonathan Blanks, Research Associate of the Cato Institute’s “Project on Criminal Justice” and a “Writer in Residence” at Harvard University’s Fair Punishment Project. The Cato Institute is not left-wing, but libertarian.

    My presentations show, clearly and compellingly, that the Blacks-commit-most-felonies pseudo-“statistics” are toxic dross — viler than junk science — redolent with the stench of psychopathic race-hatred. I wonder whether you READ all of my former comments that I cited in my comment of June 24, 2020 at 2:50 am GMT (comment # 13): your above-quoted statement can suggest that you did not.

    I suppose I must repeat, and elaborate upon, some non-statistics matters I have stated in several others of my comments posted under a few other Unz Review articles:

    I am not Black, but of Finno-Ugric ethnicity (my mother’s ethnicity likely pure Magyar, and my father’s ethnicity likely a mix of Magyar and Estonian).

    My sociopolitical/economics position is nonexistent. Politics & economics are bad, dark jokes, much because mostly humanity is psychopathic. I am an atheist who contemns all religion (even personal moral codes). My professions are law (I am a law professor) & medicine. My only quasi-political interest is whether, in a certain social milieu that happens to obtain, a particular problem really exists and, if so, may be solved “better” one way rather not another.

    I am a very old, near-hermit misanthrope. My ideals are male wolves, mountain goats, and male Canada geese. I am a Francophile and Sinophile. I worship Johann Sebastian Bach’s music. My sociopolitical/economic dream — just a dream — is a Kropotkinian anarchy of mutual aid. Cf. Leonard R. Jaffee, Empathic Adjustment an Alternative to Rules, Policies, and Politics, 58 University of Cincinnati Law Review 1161 (1990), available likely in every law school lipbrary or, for a price, at HeinOnline, web-page https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ucinlr58&div=6&id=&page=

    When I was 6 and my non-Catholic biological parents thrust me into an orphanage run by the “Catholic Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children,” a 9-years-old Black boy protected me from White inmates who threatened me near-daily and when I was 21 and 22, I lived in a partial Black ghetto and had a Black roommate (a social worker who held an MA in psychology) and two Black lovers. And I have known and worked with more than a few Black professionals who bore fine minds and produced virtuous works.

    In the movie “Hidden Figures,” one is presented also a very respectable strain of Black society. And one meets three Black women whose intelligence and learning were better than the learning or intelligence of most Whites, one of which women, Katherine Johnson, was a brilliant mathematician, whose insights and math work were vital to NASA’sd manned space travel project, insights and math work without which the project would not have succeeded.

    [Side-Note:
    One comment-poster has insisted theat Ms. Johnson’s math was not special, even rudimentary — just ordinary orbital calculation any engineer could perform. MarkinLA’s comment of June 8, 2020 at 5:10 am GMT (comment # 238) and MarkinLA’s comment of June 23, 2020 at 2:43 am GMT (comment # 387) and MarkinLA’s comment of June 23, 2020 at 2:22 pm GMT (comment # 391) and MarkinLA’s comment of June 23, 2020 at 2:40 pm GMT (comment # 392), posted under Ron Unz’s article “Race and Crime in America” https://www.unz.com/runz/race-and-crime-in-america/?showcomments#comments

    After replying twice to MarkinLA, I determined never again to reply to that comment-poster, despite his consistently unsupported, increasingly ad hominem baitings.]

    The sure fact is that all the other NASA scientists and mathematicians were stumped, and Ms. Johnson solved the problems the others could not. Watch the movie, which, though suffering some bloated Hollywood romanticizing, shows Md. Johnson’s brilliant feats, the virtue and importance of which NASA has acknowledged.
    https://www.nasa.gov/content/katherine-johnson-biography
    See also https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/stories/nasa-knows/who-was-katherine-johnson-k4
    and
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_Johnson#Awards , which lists awards Ms. Johnson received
    and
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_Johnson#Legacy_and_honors , which observes honors accorded her.

    Perhaps (I do not know because I am not privy to the calculations) Ms. Johnson did not more than apply a rather ordinary formula to an orbit problem. But, if, successfully, one applies a standard rule in a new way to a problem previously thought not amenable to application of that rule and no other expert imagined such application, then one accomplishes a brilliant feat despite the tool is “ordinary. Such occurs rarely in law.]

    Still, nothing (not even anything MarkinLA has presented) suggests that MarkinLA has received any math or science award or honor or even that he or she is an engineer (as he or she claims) or that he or she possesses any substantial math or science skill.

    End Side-Note]

    Still I have disliked perhaps 85% of the Blacks with whom I have had greater than an instant’s contact.

    And I dislike, greatly, Black “culture” — Black “comedy” (which consists mostly of attempts of shocking adults with raging streams of foul language), rap and hip-hop and other Black “music” (except rarely some real, old-time ragtime or blues), pants worn so low they show much of the wearer’s butt and having a crotch so low they look as if the wearer expelled a mass of thick diarrhea and ebonics, the cool tough-guy gait, the endzone “demonstrations” that mar pro football games, the brash idiocy of much of Black Lives Matter antics……

    I do not endure even for a 10th of a second any Black’s trying to treat me as if I were a slave-merchant, slave owner, Jim Crow South bigot or Ku Klux Klan member. I contemn affirmative action — the grievous harm of which I witnessed too much during the 26 years of my belong an active member of eight law faculties, including two of the top twenty law schools. [I cannot resist adding the matter that pro-homosexual affirmative action is near-equally harmful — a matter that is relevant because it reflects the same sick anti-utilitarian ingredient of pseudo-progressivism.]

    When I was a member of the faculty hiring committee of one law school, I witnessed, and suffered, two instances of what ought to have been merely rare aberrations of law professor hiring process. In one case, the committed interviewed a Black woman who held a non-tenured position in another law school.

    Just as I was an extremely “hard grader” of my students (most of whole did not deserve being a law student and would be a horrendous bane to their clients), I was a vicious critic of the scholarship, or lack of scholarship, and argumentation of my colleagues, most of whom hated my guts and feared arguing with me (two of my colleagues having been reduced to tears by my ruthless criticisms). Just so, when the Black woman appeared before the hiring committed, I endeavored to test whether she could survive my questioning.

    She held her own magnificently. I urged the committee to recommend her to the whole faculty. Three of five committee-members — and the anti-scholarship idiot bitch of a 320 lbs barely-above-White-trash Dean — sought to reject her. They dug up some faux slime from the hatred of the candidate’s colleague who hated her for her brilliance, even used a very minor speech-impediment against her (an impediment that could not impair the effectiveness of her teaching).

    So, I investigated the motives of the candidate’s detractors among my colleagues. They wanted to block the candidate’s appointment because they feared that the candidate’s brilliance would expose their incompetence just as I did.

    Three years earlier, another Black candidate was hired. He had been politically savvy enough to avoid scaring my colleagues when they interviewed him. Two years after he joined the faculty, he decided to leave, return to the University of Minnesota’s law school. We had become close friends. Most of our colleagues eschewed being friendly with him. He was brilliant and a fine scholar. I begged him to stay. He said he could not bear the incompetence and rough culture of most of our colleagues. A year later, I gave up and left.

    What ought one gather from those two cases? White bigotry’s worst characteristic is that White bigots cannot bear to encounter, and acknowledge, the minds of gifted Blacks, whom White bigots despise markedlyt more than the hate “ordinary” Blacks.

    At core, our society’s “racial” trouble consists of two vital ingredients. (1) Like near all other species, humans tend to repel from “the different” and gravitate to “the same.” The tendency is native, instinctual. Just so, e.g., East Asians perceive that Whites smell bad and Whites think Blacks stink and Blacks think Whites and East Asian lack sensuous scent. I confess that I find unadulterated Western and Central African Blacks’ facial and hair characteristics very unappealing. But I expect they think the same of “White” hair and facial characteristics.

    So what? We will not have peace and Benthamian-utilitarian society unless we admit such innate biases and then strive to consign their troublous manifestations to a trash dump and endeavor hard, but rationally and NOT sentimentally or with self-denigrating pseudo-progressive sick zeal, at least to coexist fairly and empathically and with sincere intent of supplying, or at least allowing, each other fair chance of happiness and least distress.

    Now your question: “Could you please comment further about how you view the impact of IQ on the crime rate in different ethnocultural and racial groups?”

    Alas, I cannot comprehend your question —

    (a) because if its diction (your term “impact” occurring in “the impact of IQ on the crime rate…” and “ethnocultural”)
    (b) because of its grammar (e.g., your term “on” in your phrase “impact of IQ on the crime rate”)
    (c) because of the indeterminacy or ambiguity of the reference(s) of your language “the impact of IQ on the crime rate in different ethnocultural and racial groups,” which language causes me to puzzle hopelessly over what your concern may be, and, too, the obscurity of how “IQ” would bear a single “impact” “on” “ethnocultural…groups” (plural) and racial groups (plural)
    (d) the indeterminability of whether you mean “within any one of the universe of ‘races’ (or racial groups, whatever “racial group” may mean) or, rather, in one ‘racial group’s’ [or ‘race’s’(?)] conduct within[?] or vis-a-vis another ‘racial group’ [or ‘race’?]

    I expect that you believe you knew what you meant and that you believe you meant what you think you said. But your beliefs failed.

    March Hare: “Then you should say what you mean.”
    Alice: “I do…”… “at least—at least I mean what I say—that’s the same thing, you know.”
    Hatter: “Not the same thing a bit ! … You might just as well say that ‘I see what I eat’ is the same…as ‘I eat what I see’ ! ”
    March Hare: “You might just as well say…that ‘I like what I get’ is the same…as ‘I get what I like’!”

    * * *

    Alice: “I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory’.” [Sic]
    Humpty Dumpty: “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you’ !” [Sic]
    Alice: “But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’.”
    Humpty Dumpty: “When I use a word…it means just what I choose it to mean….”

    Please try to refine and clarify whatever you may believe was your question. And I shall endeavor to answer.

    Maybe you are asking (a) whether, and if so, to what extent or how IQ correlates to crime-commission and, if so, whether the correlation is significant and (b) if such correlation obtains and is significant, whether its magnitude or significance varies significantly ethnocultural-to-ethnocultural (whatever “ethnocultural” is) or “race”-to-“race” [or “race” within group of “races”].

    If such is your question, then I must answer that I have not seen a “data”-collection that could premise a valid, reliable answer; and I would not consider seriously a data-set deriven per assumption that humanity is a collection of distinct “races” or that any one supposed distinct “race” was truly “pure,” not mongrel, like me and near-certainly you and all other humans except the few remaining traditional San [a.k.a. Bushman] people fortunately left free to live as the San live for about 40,000 years before the Dutch and English invaded the San habitat.

    • Replies: @Harold
    , @ia
  25. Loup-Bouc says:
    @Ano4

    Just as I “clicked on” the “Publish Comment” button, I saw that I neglected to delete the first two words and an accompanying colon

    You asked:

    And I neglected to delete the following paragraph (which bears the errors “word-couce” and “presentd” and which precedes the language: “I appreciate and thank you for the calm and civility of your reply-comment):

    If you intended every word-couce that produced your above-quoted sentence, then you did not examine sufficienty, correctly, or without bias the evidence and observations I presentd.

  26. Malla says:

    The truth is that the vast majority of browns and blacks will never get along with Whites or deep White culture. Blacks do not care about Whites rescuing blacks from Arab slavers, never did, never will. They need an excuse to hate Whitey. Even of the transatlantic slave trade would not have happened or colonialism would not have happened and yet we had somehow magically had the world of today, they would have made up some other excuses to hate Whitey. Get that straight. Colonialism, slavery, racism etc… are just excuses to hate and loot Whitey. Capice.

    Similarly they are points to destroy the moral stature of the West by the Communist elites. Once the West becomes enslaved by Communism with the accompanying death and destruction and slavery, all those points of slavery, colonialism, lynching etc… will more or less go down the memory hole. Once ((they)) gain total power, all the that charade will stop. It would have done its work.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  27. Vaterland says:
    @Rich

    Nafris in Europe provide anything but cheap labor. They provide a permanent underclass, sometimes a breeding ground for Wahhabism and terrorism, mostly just welfare recipients. They are a gigantic drain on the European social system which is a system never intended for a population with an average IQ of around 80 and clanish social structures. Their import to Europe was exclusively a result of post-WW 2 “diversity” ideology. True in Germany, true in Britain and, I think, mostly true in France. Turks are somewhat of a different matter, but the “cheap labor” argument also doesn’t hold up since basically half a century now.
    And this diversity ideology is now evolving into anti-White ideology, hatred of whites. But it is not new to the Left at all. Remember Franz Fanon as I remember a leftist “Zen master” woman instructing me how 9/11 was justified, because the West exploits the third world. And Jean Raspail died recently 94 years old.

    If these people are not stopped and as the EU parliament is insane enough to pass such a bill and adopt its ideology, a result of US-British ideological colonialism of continental Europe post WW-2, it will create the fascist backlash they are so fanatical to prevent. In fighting Hitler’s ghost, they will give birth to a real Hitler in my life time.

    So unnecessary, stupid and pathetic. Late stage Roman Empire politics.

    • Replies: @Iris
  28. Iris says:
    @Vaterland

    Remember Franz Fanon

    It is easy to “remember” what anti-colonial militant Fanon actually said, considering that his books are famous, with excerpts available for free on the Internet:

    Don’t I have anything else to do on this Earth but avenge the Blacks of the 18th century? […] I have no right, as a man of Colour, to wish the Whites to bear a burden of guilt because the past of my race. I have no right, as a man of Colour, to worry about the means that would allow me to trample on the pride of the former master. I have neither the right nor the duty to demand reparation for my enslaved ancestors. […] Will I ask the White man of today to be responsible for the slavers of the 18th century? […] I am not a slave to the Slavery that de-humanised my fathers. »

    In Frantz Fanon, “Peau noire, masques blancs”, Paris, Le Seuil, coll. « Points-Essais », 1971 (1re éd. 1952)

    But please don’t get distracted from your rabid and demented racism. It is comforting to see how low the Zionists running the show have to go to pick up their sycophants.

  29. @RobbieSmith

    I will only say that a number of Blacks are incompatible with civilization. A number being an unknown quantity more than 1.
    Unfortunately, I have seen evidence that a number of Whites, Amerinds, and Asians are incompatible with civilization as well.
    I offer no opinion on the numbers or percentages of the above, that are incompatible with civilization.

  30. Harold says:
    @Loup-Bouc

    Despite him sounding like a nutcase I decided to give him a chance and check his first piece of supposed evidence.

    Among the evidences I have presented to show that the pseudo-“statistics” are unreliable even quite invalid, one evidence item was the proven rate of false-convictions — according to one respected and reliable source, up to about 60% of murder convictions and about 36% of rape convictions: Samuel R. Gross, Kristen Jacoby, Daniel J. Matheson, Nicholas Montgomery, EXONERATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES 1989 THROUGH
    2003, 95 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 523, at 529 (2005),

    Those numbers, implausible to a sane man, were, of course, not rates of false convictions. It was 60% of exonerations were for murder and 36% of exonerations were for rape.

    I don’t think I will bother checking further.

    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
  31. ia says:
    @Loup-Bouc

    You have an interesting background but I might speculate that your early misfortunes may have created a deep psychological bias. I don’t blame you; but the vast major of white people do not have your talents and are unable to bounce back.

    I have lived around a lot of blacks in DC. I don’t share your personal background but I have come to the conclusion that while a small number of blacks are superior in talent and character to the majority of whites large numbers of blacks are simply unable to manage just about anything. They drag whites down and cannot do otherwise. It’s sad and very depressing but that’s life.

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Loup-Bouc
    , @ia
  32. Loup-Bouc says:
    @Harold

    Those numbers, implausible to a sane man, were, of course, not rates of false convictions. It was 60% of exonerations were for murder and 36% of exonerations were for rape.

    The “exonerations” were judicial exonerations, premised on evidenced-based judicial findings that the convictions were legally AND FACTUALLY wrong.

    [MORE]

    You appear not to know the legal meanings of “exoneration,” surely not the meaning pertinent to the discrete legal matter you try to put in issue. Rather than expect that your brain can comprehend pertinent judicial decisions, statutes, or legal rules, I shall refer you to a respectable here-pertinent “definition.”

    Exoneration refers to a court order that discharges a person from liability. In criminal context the term exonerate refers to a state where a person convicted of a crime is later proved to be innocent.

    https://definitions.uslegal.com/e/exoneration/ [My emphasis.]

    In some OTHER contexts (NOT criminal law and related post-conviction-relief law (like habeas corpus), “exoneration” bears meanings distinct from the meaning it has in criminal law and related post-conviction-relief law.
    * https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Exoneration
    * https://dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/exoneration.html

    You not to be a lawyer. Should (alas) you be an “attorney,” you ought not to be one, because you would be among the too many pseudo-lawyer, law-degree-holding, bar-admitted, functionally illiterate, insight-and-logic-lacking mechanics who disgrace the profession and hurt clients, the law, and society.

    You say I reference statistics (and study results) that are

    implausible to a sane man

    Weird: The “numbers” (and the studies) are respected universally in the pertinent professions — (a) the general legal and judicial practice, (b) criminal law, criminal procedure and post-conviction-relief law, (c) sociology, (d) criminology. The article [EXONERATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES 1989 THROUGH 2003] — the data and statistical inferences of which have not been challenged — was authored by four experts of the pertinent fields and published in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, which is among the leading periodicals of its field.

    I notice that you avoided referencing the four other sources I referenced. Those sources accord with the article you did reference, and those other sources’ authors are respected professionals of their fields, which are pertinent to the legal/statistical matters you try, risibly, to address.

    But I confess that I fail to account your insane “definitions” of “sane” and “implausible.”

    Taisez-vous, Monsieur Crétin. Et veuillez disparaître.

    • Replies: @Not Only Wrathful
  33. Loup-Bouc says:
    @ia

    …large numbers of blacks are simply unable to manage just about anything. They drag whites down and cannot do otherwise.

    Your view is superficially accurate. [I do not say “superficially” because I mean that you are a superficial person. I do not mean to insult you.]

    Your view does not account the CAUSES of the Blacks’ conduct you decry — causes for which Whites (and East Asians) ber much responsibility.

    One cause is that American government and society have not provided Black adequate education or cause of feeling some enthusiasm for being well educated. [I do NOT mean that government and society ought to encourage more Blacks to seek university education. For more than a few decades, our universities have absorbed many too many folks whose minds and character-structures render them incapable of utilizing “higher learning” in a Benthamian-utilitarian way or even a way safe for society.]

    Another cause is a matter I addressed in my comment to which your comment replies:

    [MORE]

    At core, our society’s “racial” trouble consists of two vital ingredients. (1) Like near all other species, humans tend to repel from “the different” and gravitate to “the same.” The tendency is native, instinctual. Just so, e.g., East Asians perceive that Whites smell bad and Whites think Blacks stink and Blacks think Whites and East Asian lack sensuous scent. I confess that I find unadulterated Western and Central African Blacks’ facial and hair characteristics very unappealing. But I expect they think the same of “White” hair and facial characteristics.

    So what? We will not have peace and Benthamian-utilitarian society unless we admit such innate biases and then strive to consign their troublous manifestations to a trash dump and endeavor hard, but rationally and NOT sentimentally or with self-denigrating pseudo-progressive sick zeal, at least to coexist fairly and empathically and with sincere intent of supplying, or at least allowing, each other fair chance of happiness and least distress.

    America’s Blacks continue to resent (understandably) their ancestors’ enslavement by American Whites and the conduct of Whites of the Jim Crow era, conduct that has not ceased, though it has diminished.

    With good cause, many poor ghetto Black youths feel hopeless soon as they learn and comprehend the history of the legal system’s horrendous treatment of their kind. That treatment has NOT been confined to ordinary “law enforcement” activity, criminal judicial process, and “correctional” systems created to “reform” convicts and deter “recidivism.” It has extended to many cases of Blacks arrested and sentenced to years of hard, chain-gang labor for charges that were not even actually criminal. Even now-days, people — poor Blacks, more than others — are jailed for not paying debts. The jailing is premised on asserted “contempt of court.”

    The seminal case is Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219 (1911), https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16688171331174227306&q=Bailey+v.+Alabama,+219+U.S.+219+(1911)&hl=en&as_sdt=6,38&as_vis=1 .

    In the Bailey case, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed Bailey v. State (Alabama Supreme Court, 1911), see page 75 at
    https://books.google.com/books?id=ockKAAAAYAAJ&pg=PR1&lpg=PR1&dq=Volume+161+cases+argued+and+determined+in+the+Supreme+Court+of+Alabama+1908-1909+Supreme+Court+of+Alabama&source=bl&ots=YFchV9edxq&sig=01adx6lIBRCsGXpHRpQAq_besQc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZ-pugh_LYAhVN_mMKHRcmDkMQ6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=Bailey&f=false

    The Alabama Supreme Court had upheld an order denying habeas corpus to Alonso Bailey (a Black), convicted by a Montgomery County Alabama justice of the peace. The charge was violation of this statute:

    Any person who, with intent to injure or defraud his employer, enters…a contract in writing for the performance of any act of service, and thereby obtains money…from such employer, and with like intent, and without just cause, and without refunding such money…, refuses or fails to perform such act or service must…be punished by a fine in double the damage suffered by the injured party, but not more than $300, one-half of said fine to go to the county and one-half to the party injured…. And the refusal or failure of any person who enters into such contract…to cultivate such land or refund such money…without just cause shall be prima facie evidence of the intent to injure his employer…or defraud him.

    [Emphasis and ellipses added by me.]

    Bailey had entered a contract that provided that he would do farm-work for 12 months and be paid $12.00 per month. The contract provided also that he receive a $15.00 advance that would be amortized by deductions from his monthly salary. Bailey received the advance.

    Bailey became ill or just too weary to work out the contract. He failed to report for work. He could not replay the $15.00 advance. Because of the statute, he was presumed (without actual evidence) to have INTENDED, when he entered the contract, to defraud his employer.

    The court sentenced Bailey to pay a fine of thirty dollars and the costs, and “in default thereof to do hard labor for twenty days in lieu of said fine, and one hundred and sixteen days on account of said costs, to make restitution to the plaintiff Riverside Company (the employer, a plantation owner), which you injured and defrauded.” Riverside Company was the employer, a plantation owner.

    Virtually penniless, Bailey faced performing hard farm-labor for one hundred thirty six days — and more — for the plaintiff, Riverside Company, without pay, and in conditions rather like the work-detail Jews suffered at Auschwitz.
    http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/article/h-1346
    http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/618.html
    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02887267
    http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=2&psid=3179
    https://www.google.com/search?hs=cS1&q=pictures+of+1900s+Alabama+peonage+workers&tbm=isch&source=univ&client=opera&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjyy5zlzeHnAhV6HjQIHQfND8MQsAR6BAgHEAE&biw=1024&bih=736

    The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Alabama Court’s decision. The Supreme Court held that Bailey’s sentence and the Alabama peonage system violated:
    (a) the U.S. Constitution’s13th Amendment (which abolished slavery and involuntary servitude)
    and
    (b) the U.S. Congress’s Act of March 2, 1867 (Rev. Stat. §§ 1990, 5526), which provided that “all laws of any State, by virtue of which any attempt should be made ‘to establish, maintain, or enforce, directly or indirectly, the voluntary or involuntary service or labor of any persons as peons, in liquidation of any debt or obligation, or otherwise,’ shall be null and void.” In holding so, the United States Supreme Court observed:

    What the State may not do directly it may not do indirectly. If it cannot punish the servant as a criminal for the mere failure or refusal to serve without paying his debt, it is not permitted to accomplish the same result by creating a statutory presumption which upon proof of no other fact exposes him to conviction and punishment.

    The peonage system used a phony criminal law to force Blacks to work for years without pay for plantation owners, mining corporations, and other private firms that thrived on free, forced hard labor of Blacks. Even today, Blacks have not forgotten such Jim Crow quasi-slavery devices. The peonage system was not the only such slavery device. Some devices were less covert — even rather transparent.

    New Jersey banned importation of slaves in 1788, but forbade free Blacks from elsewhere from settling in New Jersey. In the first two decades after the Revolutionary War, many northern states rapidly abolished slavery. But slaves were widely used in New Jersey’s agriculture and at its ports.

    New Jersey was the last Northern state to abolish slavery. An 1804 New Jersey statute & subsequent laws freed children born after the law was passed. Blacks born to slave mothers after 4 July 1804 had to serve lengthy apprenticeships to the owners of their mothers. Black women were freed at age 21, but Black men were not emancipated until age 25. After 1846, slaves born before those laws (of 1788 or 1804, supra) were considered indentured servants apprenticed for life — even if their lives ended decades after the Civil War.

    Though at first New Jersey allowed free Blacks to vote, the legislature disenfranchised them in 1807, an exclusion that lasted until 1875. By 1830, two-thirds of the slaves remaining in the North were held by masters located in New Jersey. New Jersey “abolished” slavery in 1846; but the abolition-statute qualified the abolition by redefining former slaves as apprentices who were “apprenticed for life” to their New Jersey masters.

    So, in New Jersey, slavery did not truly end until decades after 1865 (decades after U.S. Secretary of State Seward confirmed, in December 1865, that the 13th Amendment had been ratified). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_slavery_in_New_Jersey#Abolition_of_slavery

    Such history (the peonage system’s illegal imprisonment of Blacks and Black slavery and its continuation even in the North decades after the Civil War ended) — THAT history will die hard among American Blacks, as will American Blacks’s gnawing, even understandably angry, resentment of that history. Combined with the frequency of false prison sentences imposed on Blacks, that history explains much Blacks’ disdainful disregard of criminal laws.

    Am I suggesting that we forgive actual Black criminals their crimes? Absolutely NOT — just as I do not endure a Black’s angering at me or treating me contemptuously or impolitely. But Whites owe Blacks, and THEMSELVES (Whites’s own self-interest), their (Whites’) endeavoring to help Blacks assimilate and feel accepted and hopeful — help Blacks so much as they (Whites) can, reasonably, and non-self-diminishingly, AND without giving Blacks antiutilitarian give-aways (like afirmative action benefits), which denigrate and discourage Blacks and often put them in painfully awkward positions and create or reinforce existing White resentment or disdain of Blacks.

    The Black Lives Matter movement began for sound reason. It has strayed horrendously into a rabid, irrational, dangerous pursuit that will either reverse the Black population’s legitimate socioeconomic gains or thrust Whites, thence all of society, into a world worse than that fantasized in George Orwell’s novel 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.

    • Thanks: Iris
  34. Loup-Bouc says:
    @fnn

    I have rebutted the same “statistical” bullshit sixteen or more times in four or five comment threads. Your propositions state unreliable and invalid “statistics,” essentially the same illegitimate propositions several Unz Review authors and comment-posting readers have blathered many too many times.

    I find damned tiresome another assertion of the same toxic dross: I mean yours.

    Read my pertinent comments: READ them. Try to rise from your attention-deficit/logic-deficit disorder and bigot’s bias. Struggle to find a thinking mechanism in your brain.

    See, e.g., my comments referenced near the close of my comment of June 23, 2020 at 2:17 am GMT (comment # 399) and my comment of June 28, 2020 at 1:48 am GMT (comment # (533) posted under John-Paul Leonard’s 16 June 2020 Unz Review article “Or Did George Floyd Die of a Drug Overdose?” and my comment of June 26, 2020 at 3:18 am GMT (comment # 24 posted in this thread.

  35. @Loup-Bouc

    I feel perplexed when I read your posts. They are entirely incoherent to me.

    My main impression is that your theorising is not actually your purpose, instead, on a deeper level, you simply want to communicate – to be heard and to be understood.

    One problem is that your theorising is getting in the way of that effort. It is self-sabotage through defensiveness. You put forward the theorising as an excuse for simply sharing, yet it causes people to not want to listen to your sharing.

    Another problem is that Unz.com is not a great venue for reaching out for human connection.

    You should release yourself from your hermitage and seek out ordinary people in real life with which to share yourself; and drop the defensive intellectualism.

    Your negative expectations, unacknowledged, are pushing you to behave in such a way that causes people to confirm your negative expectations.

  36. ia says:
    @ia

    I have to say I don’t understand why white people (or any people) should be concerned about the welfare of another group who dislike them. Let black people, or Muslims for that matter, educate themselves.

  37. If European countries are such amazing paradise, why did your filthy ancestors leave that blessed land to plunder the colored hordes of the Americas, Africa and Asia? The Japanese and Chinese never did that and today they have nations that are virtually untouched by foreigners. You white degenerates went out of your way to plunder and fuck the whole world with your “self-interest” psychopathy and now everybody is working for your demise. What is so strange about cause and consequence for you White trash to understand?

    • Replies: @ia
  38. ia says:
    @Anti-White

    The Japanese and Chinese aren’t exactly paragons of wokeness themselves, my man.

    They were too far away from blacks to do any real damage until recently. Now the Chinese are screwing Africans more than Africans screw themselves. The Chinese and Japanese despise blacks and won’t let them into their countries. LOL. They’re just not as dumb as Whites.

    My own answer to the problem is to stop giving blacks penicillin and AIDS drugs. Let Mother Nature do the rest.

    Peace.

    • LOL: Iris
  39. anonymous[106] • Disclaimer says:

    Lol! The power of the narrative, where anything can be spun into something else altogether.

    And, who better at this than the whitevil racist scum.

  40. anonymous[106] • Disclaimer says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Why are they there at all?

    Because you mofers plundered and broke their nations. E.g. Libya.

    euRapean nations must suffer like they made others suffer.

  41. anonymous[106] • Disclaimer says:
    @Exile

    “The Grand Mosque of Brussells.” SMH.

    Yes, it is somewhat modest to be called the “The Grand…,” or perhaps you simply find such a blessed house of true monotheism incongruous in the lands of the pagan mangods-worshipping godless.

    • Replies: @Sya Beerens
  42. anonymous[106] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    Lol! To borrow someone’s words from here, with some of my own embellishments, you are simply a self-loathing curry-munching-house-“nigga.” Are you applying for asylum in some western godless cesspool, and attaching these responses to bolster your case?

    Even of the transatlantic slave trade would not have happened or colonialism would not have happened and yet we had somehow magically had the world of today, they would have made up some other excuses to hate Whitey.

    That, Mr.House-“nigga” is not the reality, yeah? The current reality should be viewed through the prism of past reality, not hypothetical dissembling like you are attempting.

    • Replies: @Malla
  43. Malla says:
    @anonymous

    House Nigga, Uncle Tom, Pom whatever B.S. used to shut down someone speaking the hard truth. I cannot waste my time on these psychological tactics. Try it on someone else.

    , not hypothetical dissembling like you are attempting.

    It is not any hypothetical dissembling but explaining the root cause of the problem. I am brown and have lived with brown blacks in Europe and made my observations. The prime driving force of virulent anti-White hatred is non White racism and jealousy. Capice.
    And thus getting used as tools by Satanic Zio elites who very well know and fan the flames of these emotions further for their dark ends. We darkies (the smart ones among us) will one day lament our stupidity of our actions as slaves in the coming NWO but it will be too late.

  44. Crypto Jews are global Intruders….”accuse the other side of that which Jew are guilty”

    “Goebbels”👈 said that….. right?

  45. Fake pics and homo erotic gifs don’t convince us healthy creatures

    Oriental fetishes

  46. @anonymous

    Bolshevik spectacles and carnivals in 21st century civilisation

    The barbarians are back wards again!!

    Karl Marx and Helena Blavatsky smell all over the place

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Guillaume Durocher Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings