The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGilad Atzmon Archive
The Unconscious Is Wiley’s Discourse
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

If Britain were a healthy society the #Wiley saga would have triggered an open discussion about race and privilege. Wiley would be invited to BBC Newsnight, he would be challenged by one of BBC’s anchors, he would be confronted by one or two representatives of the Jewish community, he would have a chance to explain where he comes from. We would be better able to understand the emerging clash between Jews and Blacks.

But Britain is not very healthy at the moment and none of the above has happened.

What happened instead was George Floyd all over again, but with a few major and significant differences. In the case of George Floyd a few policemen engaged in a deadly brutal and insidious act. In the case of Wiley, the entire Zionist league and its allies used a collective public knee to attempt the annihilation of the Black music icon. Another difference reflects on all of us. Following the Floyd murder thousands of Brits went to the streets to loudly proclaim that Black Lives Matter. They confronted the British police, they destroyed statues of slave traders. Who took to the streets to support Wiley? Do Black Lives Matter only so long as Blacks do not open their mouths?

Watch Wiley in action:

Wiley’s comments didn’t trigger the desirable, if heated, debate because Jewish power, as I define it, is the power to silence criticism of Jewish power. Every means that serves this cause is considered legitimate. Interestingly, the disabling of speech is so extreme that one can’t find out what it was that Wiley said that was so offensive. His tweets were initially removed by Twitter and as his twitter account is suspended.

Every news outlet in Britain and beyond has told us that Wiley’s tweets were horrid and anti-Semitic but no one dares to provide an example. It seems we are not even allowed to know what it is that we shouldn’t say. Possibly the censorship is even more sinister, they don’t want Wiley quoted only to find out that a large number of Brits, possibly including prominent Jewish voices, actually agree with the gist of Wiley’s statement.

Wiley is accused of promoting “Conspiracy Theories” about Jews and their power. This is slightly confusing because Jews often brag about their power and success. According to the Jewish site Israelunwired, Alan Dershowitz’s message to the Jews reflects a celebration of the power of Jews: “Why is it that Jews feel they need to apologize? Why do they feel that because they are strong and have contributed so much to the world, that deserves an apology? On the contrary! Jews should feel proud that God has given them such strength. And they have used it to help others. It is crazy that the world still has such negative beliefs about the Jewish people!”

On its face, it seems as if today’s Number One ‘Amalek,’ Wiley, a Black celebrity rapper and our prime Zionist mouthpiece, Dershowitz, agree on the significance of Jews in different domains. However, Dershowitz is entitled to brag about Jewish achievements, the Black voice Wiley is reduced to dust and declared public enemy number one.

Back in 2018 Dershowitz admitted in an Washington Examiner article that “it is true that Jews are represented in large numbers in various professionals such as the academy, finance, and the media.” Dershowitz also believes that Jewish prominence “is not because they are given preferential treatment. It is because they have proved to be successful at these enterprises. Should they be blamed for that?”

Like Dershowitz I believe that some Jews are gifted in certain areas, I also believe that people who work hard deserve acknowledgment. I am pretty sure that Wiley also agrees with that. So where is the dispute?

In both my writing and talks I keep insisting that there are no “Jewish conspiracies,” all is done in the open, whether it is AIPAC domination of USA foreign policy or Epstein flying world leaders on his Lolita Express, but you can’t talk about it. Dershowitz can brag about Jewish achievements: the rest of us can’t. Maybe we are tapping here into the true meaning of Jewish privilege.

In the last two days I searched the net to find out what words Wiley said. I found no trace, but the BBC, the failure news outlet, was proud to provide us with an extended monologue delivered by Emma Barnett.

Emma Barnett told her BBC listeners that she went through Wiley’s tweets and they where “straight out of the Hitler playbook of 1930s Nazi Germany.”

According to Barnett, Wiley tweeted that “Jewish people are cowards do something to me, I am waiting.” This doesn’t sound like Hitler to me. It is crude, it is a challenge, it involves an essentialist generalization but contains nothing that echoes Hitler or Nazi Germany. However, they still came at Wiley as hard as they could. Maybe Wiley should be recognized as the last prophet. They may want to consider integrating his tweets into the Hebrew Bible.

“They act rough,” she quotes Wiley as writing, “but they hide behind the police” – in fact, this sounds to me like a tweet by a Jewish pressure group bragging about its intimate “partnership” with UK police (also look here and here).

Barnett quotes Wiley, “who writes the laws, who changes the law, who implements the laws?” 80% of our conservative MPs are members of the Conservative Friends of Israel so the priorities of our ‘lawmakers’ are obvious. Maybe Barnett should use this opportunity and tell us how many Conservatives are friends of Hartlepool, Liverpool or any other Pool in the Kingdom.

ORDER IT NOW

“Who runs the world?” Wiley asks. I guess that when Epstein, Maxwell, Wexner and Weinstein are constantly in the headlines, this question may be rhetorical. Does Mrs. Barnett need me to introduce her to the work of Jared Kushner and his role in the Trump administration? Maybe the name Rahm Israel Emanuel rings a bell? Do I have to tell Barnett about AIPAC, CFI, LFI or the Crif?

“Who runs banking?” Barnett quotes from Wiley’s tweet. Maybe Dershowitz could help defend Wiley as he calls upon Jews to be proud of their achievements in this domain. Barnett can also look at George Soros and Black Wednesday. She can look at Goldman Sachs, Greenspan, Yellen… the list is pretty endless and growing by the day.

I guess that Barnett is sincere when she complains that “these words play of a very deep Jewish hidden fear that anti-Semitism rises up.” Yet, is “hidden” the right term? I ask because we are blitzed day and night by repetitions of this very specific Jewish fear. If there is anything that isn’t ‘hidden’ in Britain it must be the ‘Jewish fear of anti-Semitism.’

Emma Barnett doesn’t want us to talk about #Jewishprivilege. I am afraid that pushing all of social media to blacklist a Black cultural hero just a month after George Floyd, with No 10 and Priti Patel also pushing on behalf of Zion, is a privilege no other ethnic minority enjoys, certainly not the bronze community of former world leaders that were toppled one after another in recent weeks.

I do partially agree with Emma Barnet when she says “Jews don’t run the law.” Absolutely correct Emma, Jews don’t run the law, but Jewish pressure groups do and they boast about it 24/7.

Barnett declares, “Jews do not run the banks,” True again Emma, but Jews are vastly over represented in every banking and investment sector as Dershowitz boasted above.

“Jews do not run the world!” Absolutely true but AIPAC dominates American foreign policy and is proud of it.

“Where did it get his anti-Semitic memo from?” Barnett asks. I find this question slightly perplexing since statistics confirm that a large segment of Europeans may agree with Wiley. A recent major survey of public attitudes for CNN found more than a fifth of the 7,000 people polled in seven countries believed Jewish people have too much influence in finance and politics. The ADL is telling us in its latest survey that 1.09 billion “People in the world harbour anti-Semitic attitudes” out of 4 billion surveyed. Once again we are talking about 25%. To answer Barnett’s question, If Wiley was really looking for an educational source he had more than a billion people to choose from. It seems as if according to the ADL, one out of four people admit to their feelings about Jews as long as they stay anonymous. This may reveal what Wiley’s ‘crime’ was. He uttered that which most people are trained to keep to themselves.

Wiley gave us an opportunity to meet our demons, to understand what we are for real. The picture that is unfolding from that saga is grim and points to a darker future. We are terrified of our rulers and we are tormented by our own thoughts which we are scared to admit to ourselves. We are living in a world where maintaining a social media account is way more important than our own truth. This is how far we are removed from our Athenian cultural, spiritual and intellectual ethos that made the west into a distinct civilization.

For those who are confused by the Jewish institutional reaction to Wiley, the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan offers an explanation. “The unconscious is the discourse of the Other,” was, I believe, Lacan’s most important insight. The unconscious is the fear that everybody out there sees you as you are and even worse, discusses you with others behind your back. The unconscious is the fear that if you fail in bed tonight; tomorrow your neighbours will refer to you as ‘the impotent.’ In Lacanian perspectives, for self identified Jews, it seems the unconscious is the discourse of the Goyim, it is the fear that those one billion identified by the ADL as ‘anti-Semites’ will start to explore their views in the open. It is the unbearable fear that the ‘Goyim Know.’

Lacan’s insight helps us grasp the hysteria around Wiley and anti-Semitism. Self-identified Jews are very happy to brag about their successes but the idea that the same success is scrutinized by others devastates their entire existence.

If Britain were an open space, we could openly discuss all of this and move our society forward towards harmony and reconciliation. Both Jews and gentiles would benefit from such a discourse. But Britain is an occupied zone and for more than a while. It is invaded by fear and dominated by the politics of fear. This type of politics, when it appears in other countries, is called ‘terror,’ ‘fascism,’ ‘authoritarianism,’ ‘totalitarianism,’ and ‘tyrannical conditions.’ Maybe time is overdue for Jews and Goyim alike to decide if these are the conditions they want to live in.

(Republished from Gilad Atzmon by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Anti-Semitism, Britain, Censorship, Jews 
Hide 81 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Emma Barnett’s parents seem to have had an “interesting” profession (quite a few other press articles on this around if you google it) ; https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Emma_Barnett

  2. Owen C. says:

    The fucking jews at Facebook also had Wiley’s instagram pulled as well (Facebook also own IG and WhatsApp).

    If you ask me, the only thing Emma Barnett should be doing to make money is onlyfans.

    • Replies: @Randy
    , @Pseudonymous
    , @Druid
  3. ariadna says:
    @Gordon Bennett

    “From an Orthodox Jewish background, though not herself especially observant,[3] and with an ambivalence about both Orthodox and Reform Judaism,[4] Emma Barnett has described herself as a “Jew in disguise””

    I guess it means she eats shrimp.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
  4. @Gordon Bennett

    I wasn’t aware of it until an hour ago.. it is bottomless ? No wonder she was referring to her grandma and not to her papa …

  5. Randy says:
    @Owen C.

    Hey idiot. Jews own Wiley. And Atzmon is a fake.

    • LOL: Druid
  6. Al Liguori says: • Website

    Putting CHABAD FRAN in perspective—http://judaism.is/chabad.html

    CHABAD presents itself as a benign philanthropic association of orthodox Jews. It is the largest and most influential group of orthodox Jews. It behooves every Gentile to penetrate Chabad’s cover story to the core of their malign beliefs and misanthropic goals.

    To understand the malevolence of CHABAD, it is essential to understand:
    1. the intensity of their “be Chabad on the inside” deceit,
    See: Modern on the Outside and Chabad on the Inside by Rabbi Shlomo Riskin
    https://www.chabad.org/multimedia/media_cdo/aid/1130019/jewish/Modern-on-the-Outside-and-Chabad-on-the-Inside.htm
    2. the virulence of Chabad’s Jewish supremacism, See Chabad’s teaching on “Kill even the best of the Gentiles…” at: Who is human? Who is not? http://judaism.is/who-is-human.html
    3. especially in their promotion of the “Seven (actually 620) Noahide Laws” for Gentiles, a Jewish version of Islamic dhimmitude, global gentile slavery under the talmudic slavemasters. See: Noahide Deceit http://judaism.is/noahide-deceit.html

  7. Hey Gilad,

    George Floyd died from a drug overdose, not by any mistreatment by the police….

    Transcripts of the body cam audio have been published by Larry Johnson over at the Sic Semper Tyrannis blog.

    Love your work!

    • Agree: Owen C.
    • Thanks: Gilad Atzmon
  8. For now, I think the Jew State is safe from people scrutinizing its successes.

    https://alethonews.com/2020/07/29/what-happened-and-didnt-happen-at-the-israel-lebanon-border/

    Jew State timmies with their primitive culture got their ass kicked, tactically and rhetorically, by the more advanced civilization of Hezbollah, which applies necessary and proportional force in accord with jus cogens.

    Israel’s humiliation and weakness will lead the US right, including CIA ultras, to drop their flaccid dick of a client state. Israel is used up and you can see CIA mouthpieces blaming Israel for all past CIA crimes. Israel’s fifth column is already starting to get purged from positions of trust. It happened to South Africa and now it’s happening to South Africa’s successor as the stinking skunk of nations.

  9. There is also a Lacanianism “Enjoy your Symptom” which is basically the idea that the pathology you seek to conceal is really a defining characteristic about you. So for example, the Germans would not be describable as “Aryan” if it weren’t for the existence of “Jews”. Likewise people try to say that White is only definable in terms of “Not Being Black People” in America.

    The Atlantic has a hilarious article about the McRib sandwich in this context (google McRib, Lacan, Enjoy Your Symptom and you will find it). Basically antisemitism of the type Wiley engaged in is the McRib Sandwich of Jewish Civilization. It’s comes out every once in a while. They don’t want to like it, but there is something about saying “We don’t want to have to apologize for being so wonderful and successful at everything” that they actually love, like what you see in those Derschowitz quotes about Jewish power in the article above.

    The same sort of observation has been made about Robin DeAngelo’s White Fragility. It’s a kind of acceptable form of White Supremacy for all of us to say we need to really explore our White Supremacy for the benefit of accommodating black people. Like the McRib sandwich, we can’t indulge it all the time or else it’s trashy. You have to pretend to not like to eat at McDonald’s except when there is this special weird sandwich served. The exception is really the rule though.

    By pretending that it matters what Wiley tweeted we are being asked to indulge an excess of Jewish power. What if we lived in a world where nobody really cares what Wiley thinks about Jewish people.

    • Replies: @Rubicon
  10. What we are seeing here is analogous to an oil fire on water. Put it out in one location and it pops up again and again elsewhere. Another analogy would be the game of “whack a mole.”

    Truth will out.

    The majority of deracinated, Judy-Christy Magic Mindfucked Goys is still to deeply embedded in fear-based memes to speak out. Congruently, though, the awakening minority of those who are not the “chosen” of their self-created tribal Wargod, Yahweh, are not only growing in numbers, but also in resolution.

    Those of us who are not minimal in our consciousness awakening are also thankful to those noble individuals of Jewish descent who have broken ranks with the tribalist mindset and take considerable risks into sharing their insights and their truths.

  11. nature says:

    If Britain was healthy it had neither Jews nor Blacks.
    Before you get that, you’re the problem and you know it.

    • Agree: Owen C.
  12. If a Jewish person stood up and called out:

    The primary reason for Black inequality is absentee black fathers. Like one black man has 6 children from 6 different baby mamas. Inequality is due to the disintegration of the black family. Nigers gonna be Nigers

    They would loose their job and be canceled out of culture. The mother of the white cop that killed George Floyd lost her banking job just cause she is the mother of the policeman.

    I do not see the difference. You cannot say shit about black people.

    • Troll: Druid
    • Replies: @Al Liguori
    , @Owen C.
  13. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Fran Taubman

    You mean this guy could not say the things he did about Blacks??? He lost his job???

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  14. Are you sure you’re not blowing this out of proportion, Gilad? I have looked through the Guardian, and there doesn’t seem to be anything about Mr. Wiley’s difficulties with the Jewish lobby.

    • LOL: ivan
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  15. You just said it and I think you ll survive…

    But not one black intellectual survived the discussion about Jews and the Atlantic slave trade…they were all subject to an onslaught …

  16. @Gilad Atzmon

    That is because a lot of what the NOI said about the Atlantic slave trade were flat out lies. Like the percentage of Jews representing slave owners. There were very view Jews living in the South during slave and plantation time. With the figure of 75% of Jewish representation translated into 64 slave owning families. So saying that 75% of Jewish families were slave owners is very misleading.

    If you engage in scholarship to find the facts and come up with conclusions based on that research, that is considered honest scholarship. NOI has a predisposition to blame Jews because that is their slant. The head of the NOI Louis Farrakhan said the Jews did 9/11 and that Jews were tipped off prior to that day. Now you do not need to be a rocket scientist to know how far down the conspiracy list this is with regards to the Saudi’s etc. That is the context that the data by the NOI on the Atlantic Slave trade was presented. Total bullshit. There was considerable scholarship challenging the data.

    Major research by legitimate scholars have reasoned that single family households produces bad outcomes for children. Single family house holds produce more criminals, more drug addicts and poor education. Children from single family households are less likely to graduate from high school and succeed in holding a job. This is real research with cause and effect data. Unlike the shoddy NOI research. Yet you never hear BLM or Al Sharpton or any black leaders taking the blame for black in equality on the breakup of the family nucleus. BTW I am for restitution.

  17. @Al Liguori

    He was condemned by everyone. ADL on down the list. Every newspaper, every politician. You are a congenital liar Al. You consistently present shoddy scholarship and missteps in your data, which is full of error. Israelis starving Palestinians, performing medical experiments on them. A liar a non stop liar.
    Not even 1% of what you say is true. You have accused Russian Bolsheviks erroneously being Jewish. Liar. Congenital liar. You lie about everything.

  18. @traducteur

    ‘Are you sure you’re not blowing this out of proportion, Gilad? I have looked through the Guardian, and there doesn’t seem to be anything about Mr. Wiley’s difficulties with the Jewish lobby.’

    Good one.

  19. Good piece, Gilad. You at your finest.

  20. Kevin MacDonald said, in effect, “Unless your IQ is 120 or higher you shouldn’t talk about the Jews”. Well, perhaps he’s right: Regular people when they hear “Jews run the World” they, of course, assume you’re full of shit – Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are not Jewish, and two super-powers (Russia and China) seem to prefer Iran over Israel.

    There is a vivid reason why what Wiley said about Jews is talked about on the MSM at all and what Unz.Com (amongst others) says about Jews is not – articles on this website are always supplemented with tons of footnotes and references. (Remember: for example, the version of the James Damore memo that circulated in the media EXCLUDED the academic references…) There you go: What Wiley said can be dismissed out of hand, whilst it’s better and safer to pretend Unz.Com doesn’t even exist.

    If Wiley intended to ‘unmask Jewish power’ he did a disservice – now, back to Kevin MacDonald: Indeed, Wiley’s main error can’t be fixed: he simply lacks the IQ to do it properly.

  21. @Owen C.

    Boo effin hoo, cry me a river racist trash!

    • Troll: Owen C.
    • Replies: @Owen C.
  22. This article is hilarious. The equivalent would be a white B-level celebrity going onto a talk show trying to argue that black people are biologically inferior and prone to committing crime. No one would (rightly) stand for it.

  23. @Fran Taubman

    The black kids that I went to school with from 1958-1963 in St Paul, MN, lived in two parent homes for the most part. I delivered newspapers in black neighborhoods and when I would collect in the evenings, a father would usually come to the door and pay me. At school the kids might mention their fathers and how important they were to them.

    [In one house in my area had a Jewish family. I attended junior high with their daughter. She and I were friends. When I would collect on Friday evenings, her mother would cordially invite me into the house and point to the check on a shelf in a bookcase. I would pick it up, leave the coupon/receipt, thank her and leave. Somewhat later I found out what that was all about.]

    That was prior to the Great Society, that under the Democrat LBJ, and designed by the Usual Suspects, destroyed the Black family unit. The Gov threw cash at mothers without a father in the home. Incentivizing the breakup of the family. [I know, black women should have cared more about the family unit than the Benjamins.]

    I happened to have been one of the few kids in my classes at that time, that lived in a single parent (mother) household, so I was sensitive to the presence of fathers in a home.

    • Replies: @Psuedonymous
  24. @Vergissmeinnicht

    Wiley is an entertainer. Who owns Entertainment, Inc.? Wiley may have instructed to deliver this performance to black wash such criticism of the owners. Actors/Singers same thing. “Here’s your lines.”

    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
    , @Biff
  25. @SaneClownPosse

    Look I know you’d love to go back to a time where Black people and other minorities didn’t have the right to vote, when a white man working at the Ford factory could buy a house, two cars and support his homemaker wife with four kids but that isn’t happening. In the real world, today, you (or your kids) must out compete those who are hungrier for success. Your white picket fence America isn’t coming back.

    • Replies: @Majority of One
  26. @SaneClownPosse

    One argument for Free Speech is that in countries with Draconian ‘speech codes’, you still may be able to say pretty much anything as long as you know HOW to say it – and that skill requires intelligence. So, the lower-than-average IQ and the impulsive ones would be excluded from it, and being like that isn’t their fault. Hence, ‘speech codes’ are elitist and anti-democratic. (It is somewhat similar to the ‘Intellectual Dark Web’ argument from ‘Neurodiversity’, which reads, “University speech codes oppress autists because autists can’t, by definition, figure out which speech offends“.)
    .
    .
    .
    There are many propaganda tactics: For example, to link the statement “Jews run the World” to Hitler/the Nazis, or to link it to a contemporary example of someone who is a murderer/insane person (being that insanity real or manufactured by the powers-that-be), or to, alternatively, promote someone who once said that but now is so, so sorry…
    I remember an ‘Alt-Right’ article about Owen Benjamin classifying him talking about ‘Jewish power’ and then, in the next line, talking about Flat Earth B.S. as a disservice – and rightly so. The author even rumoured that Mr Benjamin lost so much money that he was cunningly concocting his own comeback: Mr Benjamin would, in the future, allege that when he was talking about “the Jews” he was crazy and that the smoking gun for it would be that him concomitantly thought the Earth was flat (!) – therefore, he is to be forgiven.

  27. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Fran Taubman

    No, Fran, you are the liar—just as Chabad rabbis exhort you to be! http://judaism.is/chabad.html . I backed up my every charge. Since you repeat your lies, I will repeat the antidote.

    Medical experimentation: https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/w/israel-accused-of-medical-experiments-on-palestinian-prisoners See also the tens of thousands of Palestinian children killed in the 1950’s by cancer after the Israelis experimented on them using radiation to “treat” scalp ringworm infections.
    Organ harvesting: http://www.counterpunch.org/2009/08/28/israeli-organ-harvesting/ http://judaism.is/organ-harvesting.html
    Chemical weapons, e.g., white phosphorous rained on men, women, and children during Operation Cast Lead: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article5447590.ece
    Ethnic biological weapons experimentation: https://www.wired.com/1998/11/israels-ethnic-weapon/ See also: http://mondoweiss.net/2010/10/harvest-of-excrement-colonists-in-occupied-territories-pump-sewage-on-to-palestinian-farm-land
    Starvation, food blockades, destruction of Palestinian farms and water sources: https://www.arabamerica.com/starving-the-palestinians-to-come-to-the-israeli-peace-table-a-bad-strategy/ and
    http://thefreethoughtproject.com/israel-caught-illegally-spraying-toxic-herbicides-palestinian-farmlands/ and https://english.palinfo.com/news/2019/8/7/Agriculture-in-Jordan-Valley-on-verge-of-collapse etc. etc. etc.

    • Thanks: mark green
  28. ‘… In the real world, today, you (or your kids) must out compete those who are hungrier for success…’

    That wouldn’t have anything to do with why all those immigrants were let in, would it?

  29. @Fran Taubman

    ‘… You are a congenital liar Al. You consistently present shoddy scholarship and missteps in your data, which is full of error. Israelis starving Palestinians, performing medical experiments on them. A liar a non stop liar.
    Not even 1% of what you say is true. You have accused Russian Bolsheviks erroneously being Jewish. Liar. Congenital liar. You lie about everything.’

    Honestly, Fran. You sound like a spoiled six year old throwing a fit.

  30. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Fran Taubman

    Yet another Chabad-inspired lie, Fran. Lying to Gentiles again! Why pretend that only the Nation of Islam adduces evidence against the Jews for their dominance of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade?

    Wall Street Was a Slave Market Before It Was a Financial Center by Alan Singer, Huffington Post, March 18, 2012 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wall-street-was-a-slave-m_b_1208536

    Jews have wrought misery upon humanity far in disproportion to their tiny fraction of the global population. This is as true for the Jewish role in the “Black Holocaust” as in the case of Jewish Communism. Jews were the primary distillers of rum and spirits in Newport, Rhode Island (and elsewhere). Jewish slavers used the rum to trade for slaves in Africa. On return to the Western Hemisphere, Jewish slavers sold their surviving human cargo to mostly Jewish auctioneers. Since the Jewish slavers and auctioneers only held ownership for brief periods until sold, census data, as frequently cited in factoids (sound like facts) by deniers of the Black Holocaust, drastically undercounts the Jewish role in the Black Holocaust. That said, even the census data shows that about 78% of Jewish households held slaves, approximately double the rate of Gentile slave ownership. See: Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America by Elizabeth Donnan, 1930 Pittsburg: Carnegie Institute of Technology.

    Even The Jewish Encyclopedia remarks upon the dominance of Jewish slavers. Consistent with the Jewish Master Race theology on slavery, The Jewish Encyclopedia, entry on “Agriculture,” 1906 edition, page 266, boasted: “In fact, the cotton-plantations in many parts of the South were wholly in Jewish hands, and as a consequence slavery found its advocates among them.” http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/910-agriculture

    • Thanks: Druid
    • Replies: @mark green
  31. Owen C. says:
    @Pseudonymous

    This is the Unz Review, not Buzzfeed or Onlyfans. If you don’t like the heat, get out of the kitchen.

  32. Owen C. says:
    @Fran Taubman

    > the white cop that killed George Floyd
    > killed George Floyd

    No, you idiot. George died of a heart attack brought on by a Fentanyl OD, not to mention that he had Corona antibodies in his system.

  33. Biff says:
    @SaneClownPosse

    Wiley is an entertainer.

    I’m glad you didn’t call him a musician.

  34. Pheasant says:

    ‘Emma Barnett doesn’t want to talk about Jewish privelige’

    Her private school fees were paid by her father who earned the money by running brothels and escort services. Her mother was the madam. There is speculation trafficked women were involved. He was only caught recently and was let off very lightly. They were pretty out in the open with it-some of the prostitute’s photographs (for the brothel websites) were taken in thier living room. They spent their earnings on a rolls royce and flashy jewelry.

    Jewish privelige indeed.

  35. Pheasant says:
    @ariadna

    I guess it means shes blonde and acts victimised when people make semi-critical remarks about Jews in front of her.

  36. Pheasant says:
    @Fran Taubman

    ‘He was condemned by everyone’

    Lol no.

    Almost a million Israelis attended his funeral.

    You can’t even lie correctly.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
    , @ivan
  37. @Gilad Atzmon

    Leaving you Gilad just writing to say goodbye. Moving to other spots on UR that are more discerning about their commentators and their postings. Allowing Al Liqouri to post nonstop off topic gratuitous Jewish porn that is way over the top and false. More important it takes away from the debate. I can’t stand it. Other writers ban cartoon like personal attacks. This is also true of the anon posting under different numbers calling me Jew cunt without any discussion of your article. Just personal off topic.BS. Sorry to low brow for me.

  38. @Pheasant

    He was 90 wears old when he said the racist stuff. Many thought he had dementia. His racist comments did not represent his lifetime of work which was formidable about Jewish law. The content of his writings were important having nothing to do with racism.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @anon
    , @cassandra
  39. @Psuedonymous

    Pseudo: It appears that you are rather young and thus had no experience in living in close proximity to stable black families in the late 50’s–early 60’s. As SCP points out, the demolition of the black nuclear family was primarily the achievement of the regicidal Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” hoax, where in order to get financial assistance in the Aid for Dependent Children fiasco, the rule was that there could be no (presumably) wage-earning capable man in the house. So to get the bennies for her kids and herself, Daddy got kicked outta the house.

    Feeling needful of regular congress, mama invited in a series of boyfriends, babymamaing all over the place in the process. One egregious result of all that was that about the time her boy children reached the age of 10 or so, they were pretty much told to go play out in the streets while mama was enjoying her latest stud in the bedroom. Those streetboyz started hanging together for mutual support and next thing you know, another gang was in the works.

    Along with “last hired, first fired” economic policies, the aid for dependent children business was central to destruction of the black nuclear family. Boys desperately need steady adult male role-models. If one is not present they tend to run wild. So this devolution is mostly on the govmint.

    • Replies: @Rubicon
  40. Gordo says:

    In the case of George Floyd a few policemen engaged in a deadly brutal and insidious act.

    Not what the autopsy says, the entire MSM is a lie machine.

  41. Based Lad says:
    @Fran Taubman

    “Oy Vey these goyim are ATTACKING MY JEWISHNESS AND BEING ANTI-SEMITIC ITS ANNUDAH SHOAH”

    Don’t let the wooden door hit you on the way out.

  42. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Fran Taubman

    a representative sample of “respectful” “high brow” posts by CHABAD FRAN:

  43. @Fran Taubman

    ‘He was 90 wears old when he said the racist stuff. Many thought he had dementia. His racist comments did not represent his lifetime of work which was formidable about Jewish law. The content of his writings were important having nothing to do with racism.’

    Shall we go into his remarks about gentiles?

    ‘…Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel.”

    “In Israel, death has no dominion over them… With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money.

    “This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew.”

    “Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat… That is why gentiles were created.”…’

    The irony is that his remarks were actually intended to curb the more murderous sentiments of the Jews he was speaking to. ‘Don’t kill the goyim — they are here to serve us.’

    Ovadia Josef represented the more moderate, restrained wing of conventional Jewish thought. Under Jews such as him, we can rest assured we will be permitted to live so long as we are docile.

    • Agree: Pheasant
    • Thanks: ivan
  44. @Fran Taubman

    ‘Leaving you Gilad just writing to say goodbye. Moving to other spots on UR that are more discerning about their commentators and their postings…’

    The difficulty there, Fran, is that for that very reason, you promptly find yourself blocked from those spots.

  45. ” In the case of George Floyd a few policemen engaged in a deadly brutal and insidious act.”

    Nonsense.

    George Floyd died of a drug overdose that aggravated underlying conditions while resisting arrest. The autopsy report is here: https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/06/05/read-george-floyd-autopsy-report-with-cause-of-death-and-other-factors/. The second “autopsy”, commissioned by Floyd’s family was done by a discredited examiner, Michael Baden, using only an examination of photographs and videos of the arrest. Baden is a hired gun, who has twice openly admitted to perjury and who was fired from at least two positions for unprofessional conduct before his new “career” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Baden.

    A youtube search using “george floyds arrest” brings up a series of videos. They clearly show George Floyd’s arrest by three officers much less physically imposing than him. They have succeeded in getting Floyd into a patrol car when he begins resisting them. He literally overpowers the three of them. They then call for assistance from a fourth officer, matching Floyd’s physique, who finally succeeds in subduing Floyd. This officer uses a standard technique for controlling a detainee who is resisting arrest. At no time does he put his knee on Floyd’s neck or otherwise restrain his breathing.

    Who are you going to believe the MSM, George Soros’s minions, or your lying eyes.

    BTW, speaking of powerful Jews controlling things, Soros got his ill earned billions shorting the Bank of England, destroying many goyische lives in the process. He’s now using that money to bankroll the destruction of nominally Christian societies around the world. BLM , antifa, and the like in the USA are funded and controlled by Soros. He’s successfully funded and is continuing to fund the election of radical prog Attorneys General and District Attorneys who conduct malicious prosecutions of conservatives and refuse to prosecute outrageous violations of the law by radical progs.

    A Soros-funded attorney general, Keith Ellison, is targeting the cops who arrested Floyd. The unmolested prog rioters, looters, arsonists, and even murderers https://www.koin.com/news/crime/1-dies-in-se-portland-stabbing-man-charged-with-murder/ and https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/20/us/seattle-capitol-hill-chop-chaz-shooting/index.html demonstrate the power of Soros’s minions at derailing righyeous prosecution of prog crimes.

    Wake up and smell the coffee.

    • Replies: @Owen C.
  46. @Vergissmeinnicht

    There is a vivid reason why what Wiley said about Jews is talked about on the MSM at all and what Unz.Com (amongst others) says about Jews is not – articles on this website are always supplemented with tons of footnotes and references. (Remember: for example, the version of the James Damore memo that circulated in the media EXCLUDED the academic references…) There you go: What Wiley said can be dismissed out of hand, whilst it’s better and safer to pretend Unz.Com doesn’t even exist.

    I agree with your assessment.

    However, I think only Chomsky-tier cunning can explain why UR publishes the said content. The site proprietor is no simpleton looking at his academic qualifications and background in financial services.

    • Replies: @nature
  47. nature says:
    @Amerimutt Golems

    A bachelor of arts in physics?

  48. @Al Liguori

    Yet another Chabad-inspired lie, Fran. Lying to Gentiles again!

    Thank you for your diligent research, Al. I doubt however that any amount of evidence you marshall will ever quiet our resident yenta.

    Fran’s a true believer in divine, unerring, Jewish probity.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Al Liguori
  49. @mark green

    ‘Thank you for your diligent research, Al. I doubt however that any amount of evidence you marshall will ever quiet our resident yenta…’

    See post #39.

    Officially, she’s left.

    However, I’ve the vague impression this has happened before.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  50. @Fran Taubman

    ‘…Sorry to low brow for me.’

    …managing to massacre ‘too low brow’ is definitely a Fran-only classic.

    • LOL: Al Liguori, nature
  51. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    See post #39.

    Officially, she’s left.

    However, I’ve the vague impression this has happened before.

    Indeed, CHABAD Fran’s promises are on a par with her “facts.” http://judaism.is/torah-encourages-lies.html

    • Replies: @anon
  52. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @mark green

    Thank you. Truly as you say!

    While CHABAD Fran likes to think she is the target of my posts, it is really the newbies and fence-sitters about whom I care. The first time that newbies hear Jew-splaining of the misanthropic, perverse, and blasphemous “Torah” content, they may take it at face-value.

    “We don’t believe that any more,” “It’s a different Jesus of Nazareth,” “We just meant the Egyptians, not all Gentiles,” “The Talmud is just a series of debates, no real dogma,” “You’re taking that out of context (as if there is any legitimate “context” for condoning sex with 3 year olds, fellating baby boys, and deceiving, looting, enslaving, raping, and killing Gentiles),” etc.—We shouldn’t allow anyone to fall prey for any of those pervasive Jew lies.

  53. anon[297] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    He was 90 wears old when he said the racist stuff. Many thought he had dementia. His racist comments did not represent his lifetime of work which was formidable about Jewish law. The content of his writings were important having nothing to do with racism.

    🤣🤣🤣

    Nah, his racist jew comments were straight out of your racist jew Talmud, you stupid racist jew cunt.

    Chief rabbi calls black people ‘monkeys’

    Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef uses pejorative term ‘kushi’ for African Americans in weekly sermon

    The Sephardic chief rabbi of Israel called black people “monkeys” during his weekly sermon on Saturday evening.

    In footage aired by the Ynet news site, Yosef could be seen referring to black people by the word “kushi,” which in modern Hebrew has pejorative connotations, and then going on to term a black person a “monkey.”

    His office told Ynet that the comparison was a quote from the Talmud.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/chief-rabbi-compares-african-americans-to-monkeys/

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
    , @nature
  54. anon[180] • Disclaimer says:
    @Al Liguori

    Indeed, CHABAD Fran’s promises are on a par with her “facts.” http://judaism.is/torah-encourages-lies.html

    Yep, check out the stuff about “the Blacks”, “Christians” and “Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils” below:

    [MORE]

    Defense Mechanisms

    What were the detailed mechanisms (other than bribery) employed by Jewish communities, in cooperation with outside forces, in order to ward off the attack on the Talmud and other religious literature? Several methods can be distinguished, all of them having important political consequences reflected in current Israeli policies. Although it would be tedious to supply in each case the Beginistic or Labour-zionist parallel, I am sure that readers who are somewhat familiar with the details of Middle East politics will themselves be able to notice the resemblance.

    The first mechanism I shall discuss is that of sereptitious defiance, combined with outward compliance. As explained above, talmudic passages directed against Christianity or against non-Jews had to go or to be modified – the pressure was too strong. This is what was done: a few of the most offensive passages were bodily removed from all editions printed in Europe after the mid-16th century. In all other passages, the expressions ‘Gentile’, ‘non-Jew’, ‘stranger’ (goy, eino yehudi, nokhri) – which appear in all early manuscripts and printings as well as in all editions published in Islamic countries – were replaced by terms such as ‘idolator’, ‘heathen’ or even ‘Canaanite’ or ‘Samaritan’, terms which could be explained away but which a Jewish reader could recognize as euphemisms for the old expressions.

    As the attack mounted, so the defence became more elaborate, sometimes with lasting tragic results. During certain periods the Tsarist Russian censorship became stricter and, seeing the above mentioned euphemisms for what they were, forbade them too. Thereupon the rabbinical authorities substituted the terms ‘Arab’ or ‘Muslim’ (in Hebrew, Yishma’eli – which means both) or occasionally ‘Egyptian’, correctly calculating that the Tsarist authorities would not object to this kind of abuse. At the same time, lists of Talmudic Omissions were circulated in manuscript form, which explained all the new terms and pointed out all the omissions. At times, a general disclaimer was printed before the title page of each volume of talmudic literature, solemnly declaring, sometimes on oath, that all hostile expressions in that volume are intended only against the idolators of antiquity, or even against the long-vanished Canaanites, rather than against ‘the peoples in whose land we live’. After the British conquest of India, some rabbis hit on the subterfuge of claiming that any particularly outrageous derogatory expression used by them is only intended against the Indians. Occasionally the aborigines of Australia were also added as whipping-boys.

    Needless to say, all this was a calculated lie from beginning to end; and following the establishment of the State of Israel, once the rabbis felt secure, all the offensive passages and expressions were restored without hesitation in all new editions. (Because of the enormous cost which a new edition involves, a considerable part of the talmudic literature, including the Talmud itself, is still being reprinted from the old editions. For this reason, the above mentioned Talmudic Omissions have now been published in Israel in a cheap printed edition, under the title Hesronot Shas.) So now one can read quite freely – and Jewish children are actually taught – passages such as that which commands every Jew, whenever passing near a cemetery, to utter a blessing if the cemetery is Jewish, but to curse the mothers of the dead if it is non-Jewish. In the old editions the curse was omitted, or one of the euphemisms was substituted for ‘Gentiles’. But in the new Israeli edition of Rabbi Adin Steinsalz (complete with Hebrew explanations and glosses to the Aramaic parts of the text, so that schoolchildren should be in no doubt as to what they are supposed to say) the unambiguous words ‘Gentiles’ and ‘strangers’ have been restored.

    Under external pressure, the rabbis deceptively eliminated or modified certain passages – but not the actual practices which are prescribed in them. It is a fact which must be remembered, not least by Jews themselves, that for centuries our totalitarian society has employed barbaric and inhumane customs to poison the minds of its members, and it is still doing so. (These inhumane customs cannot be explained away as mere reaction to antisemitism or persecution of Jews: they are gratuitous barbarities directed against each and every human being. A pious Jew arriving for the first time in Australia, say, and chancing to pass near an Aboriginal graveyard, must – as an act of worship of ‘God’ – curse the mothers of the dead buried there.) Without facing this real social fact, we all become parties to the deception and accomplices to the process of poisoning the present and future generations, with all the consequences of this process.

    The Deception Continues

    Modern scholars of Judaism have not only continued the deception, but have actually improved upon the old rabbinical methods, both in impudence and in mendacity. I omit here the various histories of antisemitism, as unworthy of serious consideration, and shall give just three particular examples and one general example of the more modern ‘scholarly’ deceptions.

    In 1962, a part of the Maimonidean Code referred to above, the so-called Book of Knowledge, which contains the most basic rules of Jewish faith and practice, was published in Jerusalem in a bilingual edition, with the English translation facing the Hebrew text. The latter has been restored to its original purity, and the command to exterminate Jewish infidels appears in it in full: ‘It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands.’ In the English translation this is somewhat softened to: ‘It is a duty to take active measures to destroy them.’ But then the Hebrew text goes on to specify the prime examples of ‘infidels’ who must be exterminated: ‘Such as Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot’. Not one ‘word of this appears in the English text on the facing page (78a). And, even more significant, in spite of the wide circulation of this book among scholars in the English-speaking countries, not one of them has, as far as I know, protested against this glaring deception.

    The second example comes from the USA, again from an English translation of a book by Maimonides. Apart from his work on the codification of the Talmud, he was also a philosopher and his Guide to the Perplexed is justly considered to be the greatest work of Jewish religious philosophy and is widely read and used even today. Unfortunately, in addition to his attitude towards non-Jews generally and Christians in particular, Maimonides was also an anti-Black racist. Towards the end of the Guide, in a crucial chapter (book III, chapter 51) he discusses how various sections of humanity can attain the supreme religious value, the true worship of God. Among those who are incapable of even approaching this are:

    “Some of the Turks [i.e., the Mongol race] and the nomads in the North, and the Blacks and the nomads in the South, and those who resemble them in our climates. And their nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey, because they have the image and the resemblance of a man more than a monkey does.”

    Now, what does one do with such a passage in a most important and necessary work of Judaism? Face the truth and its consequences? God forbid! Admit (as so many Christian scholars, for example, have done in similar circumstances) that a very important Jewish authority held also rabid anti-Black views, and by this admission make an attempt at self-education in real humanity? Perish the thought. I can almost imagine Jewish scholars in the USA consulting among themselves, ‘What is to be done?’ – for the book had to be translated, due to the decline in the knowledge of Hebrew among American Jews. Whether by consultation or by individual inspiration, a happy solution’ was found: in the popular American translation of the Guide by one Friedlander, first published as far back as 1925 and since then reprinted in many editions, including several in paperback, the Hebrew word Kushi, which means Blacks, was simply transliterated and appears as ‘Kushites’, a word which means nothing to those who have no knowledge of Hebrew, or to whom an obliging rabbi will not give an oral explanation. During all these years, not a word has been said to point out the initial deception or the social facts underlying its continuation – and this throughout the excitement of Martin Luther King’s campaigns, which were supported by so many rabbis, not to mention other Jewish figures, some of whom must have been aware of the anti-Black racist attitude which forms part of their Jewish heritage.

    Surely one is driven to the hypothesis that quite a few of Martin Luther King’s rabbinical supporters were either anti-Black racists who supported him for tactical reasons of ‘Jewish interest’ (wishing to win Black support for American Jewry and for Israel’s policies) or were accomplished hypocrites, to the point of schizophrenia, capable of passing very rapidly from a hidden enjoyment of rabid racism to a proclaimed attachment to an anti-racist struggle – and back – and back again.

    [Israel Shahak: Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.]

    https://ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/shahak.html

    • Agree: Al Liguori
  55. Wiley is accused of promoting “Conspiracy Theories” about Jews and their power. This is slightly confusing because Jews often brag about their power and success.

    Yes, it is confusing. I encountered this bewildering and seemingly paradoxical behavior myself. Several years ago I was the target of a Zio-blackmail and blackballing campaign while teaching at a college, brought on largely due some critical comments I made about Wall St banks. I never mentioned “Jews.” But the Zios decided to accuse me of being a Yahud hater during lecture and subjected me to a “struggle session.”

    Part of what bewildered me about the whole thing was that it was the Zios who let my whole class know about Jewish dominance in banking, not me. At the same time that they were upset about the fact that I knew about it, they had no problem “red-pilling” many of the gentile students, because they got off on displaying their power and showing all the goyim how the rules of polite society don’t apply to them. For more info: https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/virginia-goes-zionist/#comment-3810678

    Stories like this are essentially the same thing. One would think that with all their intelligence, the Tribe Inc establishment would prefer to let Wiley’s tweets die a quite death and be forgotten. But they can’t not take the bait because displaying their power and watching goyim squirm is what gets them high.

    What I think it reflects is that while the Tribe is known for its high IQ, as a general rule, it also has a very low emotional intelligence.

    I was thinking about this paradox and I imagined someone hiking in the wild while snacking on some tasty treats. Perhaps a stray dog or a coyote smells the treats and covets them. The canine will take one of two approaches to getting the treats: a power play where it scares you and gets you to give up the goods, or a pity play where it gains your sympathy with sad puppy eyes and gets you to feed it. But no animal has such a low emotional intelligence that it will simultaneously employ both pity and power play. Any mammal of some intelligence knows, instinctively, that the two approaches negate each other. One does not pity those who intimidate, and one does not fear those who are pitiful.

    How does the Tribe not understand this? Is their emotional intelligence lower than a dog? I think all people can imagine powerful individuals who might not be well liked, but who are respected. I think we can also imagine people who are not respected, but who people want to help and protect. But when powerful people, who show no mercy, demand pity and mercy, the average human being is disgusted and appalled.

    “The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.” Is this not the essence of all anti-Jewish feeling?

  56. @Fran Taubman

    Wasn’t condemned by Maimonides though – these views agree with Taumudic teachings.

    • Agree: ivan
  57. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @anon

    Yes. Meanwhile the Jews chase down 80 and 90-year old janitors and accountants for prosecution. The (((hypocrites))) will whine and rend their garments when Jews are in the docket for their crimes against humanity, including economic crimes against humanity.

    • Agree: ivan
  58. Druid says:
    @Gordon Bennett

    Her parents were pimps and brothel-keepers. Why not just say it!

  59. Druid says:
    @Owen C.

    Her parents would approve, though maybe not. They could put her out on the streets where her kind belong!

  60. Druid says:
    @Sean

    BS. This actor in his over-acting knows he’s lying!

  61. nature says:
    @anon

    Looks like a honest jew to me, the exception.

  62. I don’t think Jews can live in Christian Society, they will ALWAYS subvert that which they feel is potential destruction, but REFUSE to search their own BEHAVIOR! This will NEVER change and the best result would be for Jews to go home to Israel or convert to Christianity and live Christian LIVES!!

    • Replies: @anon
  63. ariadna says:

    “for self identified Jews, it seems the unconscious is the discourse of the Goyim, it is the fear that those one billion identified by the ADL as ‘anti-Semites’ will start to explore their views in the open. It is the unbearable fear that the ‘Goyim Know.’

    No evidence that the “unbearable fear that the ‘Goyim Know” is unconscious. No need for thin and overstretched philosophical speculations.
    On the contrary it seems well informed, internalized, prioritized and constantly prevented with a wide and in-depth strategy to stultify, deceive and muzzle the Goyim.

  64. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @MIssouri Bear

    …the best result would be for Jews to go home to Israel or convert to Christianity

    Home would be a Jersey toxic landfill surrounded
    by a high, thick, deep wall topped by cluster bombs
    or
    Hell.

    Christians have had plenty of experience with Yid converts.

    Satan can keep his spawn till Hell freezes over.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  65. Gilad, you say there are no Jewish conspiracies, all is done in the open, but no-one is allowed to say anything about it. There’s a contradiction there. It’s not done in the open, it’s just that what we think we think of as open has been closed. All the conspiring is done in the open, but hidden from most.

  66. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    That is a good point! Like a wife beater who boasts about wife beating, but doesn’t allow the wife to open her mouth.. An uncomfortable inbetween land.

  67. Owen C. says:
    @Jus' Sayin'...

    I would chuck you an Agree, but I’ve reached my limit for 8 hrs.

  68. cassandra says:
    @Fran Taubman

    He was 90 wears old when he said the racist stuff. Many thought he had dementia.

    Still, he wasn’t forgotten by everybody as you originally claimed, was he? I worry that you might be suffering from dementia yourself. Pheasant’s main point, that a million Israelis attended his funeral, has somehow slipped your mind.

  69. cassandra says:

    @Al Liguori, @SaneClownPosse, @Colin Wright, @Pheasant, @Ilya G Poimadres, @Owen C.

    Leaving you Gilad just writing to say goodbye.

    Oh, drat.

    I want to thank you all for your comments on Taubman’s postings. I learned a lot from your rebuttals to her misrepresentations, and found the back-and-forth thought-provoking.

    I do hope she comes back, and that she provokes another similarly fruitful firestorm of interesting exchanges. Great example of how free speech supports free thought.

    Thanks 😉

  70. nature says:

    Those are two videos about a video game.
    Produced but a really cunty Israeli.



    It’s a fantastic inside into what’s wrong with the jews.

    @Gilad Atzmon Worth a watch. The eternal projectors of their own sickness in action.

  71. Polemos says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Yet you never hear BLM or Al Sharpton or any black leaders taking the blame for black in equality on the breakup of the family nucleus.

    What was the Million Man March about?

    What did they intend for the men to do after the march by getting the men to see they had not done before the march?

    If we held men to their own highest standards and asked men to be the best versions of themselves, what would they look like and do in your view? What do the best men do and how do they act?

  72. Polemos says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    What’s the contradiction? How much do you think your response differs from his point?

    “What we think we think of” is exactly how the unconscious differs from consciousness, and if closed from us, then we aren’t thinking of what we’re thinking, but thinking without thinking of what we’re thinking, or thinking as though there is nothing else but conscious us.

    So, what do you think you’re thinking of that differs from what you think Atzmon’s thinking of thinking of?

  73. Rubicon says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    American Citizen rightly asks:

    “By pretending that it matters what Wiley tweeted we are being asked to indulge an excess of Jewish power. What if we lived in a world where nobody really cares what Wiley thinks about Jewish people.”

    This is precisely the point Atzmon, Dershowitz and all the others should ask themselves: WHY do you people continuously perseverate on being Jews?

    None of you were given Divine Rights by God in proclaiming some sort of privileged population. Throughout human history, no other people have remained fixated on THEMSELVES.

    It’s as American Citizen says: we really don’t give a shit what you people think. Get real; get Life in all its manifestations. Forget your supposed claim as “special people.”
    The eyes of God sure as hell don’t view you as anyone more exceptional than the other six billion citizens on Planet Earth.

  74. ivan says:
    @Pheasant

    I recall that the Ovadia bum was a big timer. Like the other guy Schneersohn. At that time the Israeli propaganda mill was churning out stuff about what Muslim clerics were saying about the kaffirs based on the hadiths and the Queeran. It turns out that the Talmudic version is worse, and they have in addition colourful stories from the same Talmud to embellish their sayings.

    After it became common knowledge – at least in comparison with what was the case before – that the Talmud may as well be the original of the hadiths, the Zionist propagandists laid off a little on picking out the sermons and sayings of Muslim clerics to show how hateful they were, for the Jewish versions were just as bad or worse.

    • Agree: Al Liguori
    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  75. ivan says:
    @Gordon Bennett

    Further down the wikispooks link, we have Corbyn defending this Emma character, by declaiming that she was only doing her job. But that didn’t save Corbyn from the charge of auntiesemintism. Corbyn spent half his time fending charges of Judenhass but to no avail. Neither the Juden or the lying Right Wing obsessed as it was with getting out of Europe, would have any of it.

  76. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @ivan

    Especially in view of Chabad*** Fran’s Jew-splaining about Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, you may find this article illuminating:

    Dossier on Israeli Rabbi Ovadia Yosef’s Bigotry, Racism and Incitement
    Which the controlled Media minimize or omit
    by Michael Hoffman, October 7, 2013,updated March 5, 2020 https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2013/10/rabbi-ovadias-record-of-hate-speech.html

    *** http://judaism.is/chabad.html

  77. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:

    Dossier on Israeli Rabbi Ovadia Yosef’s Bigotry, Racism and Incitement

    Appears to be a typical, normal rabbi, Yid.

  78. Rubicon says:
    @Majority of One

    Majority One says:
    “As SCP points out, the demolition of the black nuclear family was primarily the achievement of the regicidal Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” hoax….”

    It’s rather obvious, you don’t read American history; nor even of this particular era.

    In fact, there is a very definite tie between the rise of Neo-Liberalism, as posited by Greenspan and other think tanks in the mid/late 70s under Reagan & Thatcher. (If you don’t know what Neo-liberalism is, look it up with its hard core facts.)

    As Neo-Liberalism rose in power in mid-late 70s and clear through the 90s, what we saw were multiple seizures of manufacturing/others smaller companies put in the hands of a rising Oligarchy. They THEN started outsourcing MILLIONS OF AMERICAN JOBS to China. Why? In that way, these wealthy corporations/banks/the rise of hedge funds/others drastically cut their labor costs. Result: blue collar jobs, by the millions were lost. Millions of Black families, with fathers who had well paid jobs were destroyed by Neo-Liberalism. Today, America makes NOTHING; result: NO JOBS.

    So it WAS NOT during the LBJ period who, in actuality spent millions of $$$s providing college education to Blacks/Others. (Amongst other benefits.) We know this because our father was a Federal Project Director in California.

    Try getting up to speed with the history of America from the mid-60s up to now.
    Then you’ll make sense.

    • Disagree: Colin Wright
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gilad Atzmon Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings