The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGilad Atzmon Archive
Mamet’s Bitter Wheat, #MeToo and the Role of Jewish Parody
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

David Mamet’s “Bitter Wheat” tackles the contemporary saga of a Hollywood sex predator at the centre of #MeToo. Barney Fein, the protagonist of Mamet’s new play, refers to himself as a ‘fat kike.’ He is as monstrous and arrogant as anyone could possibly be. And in addition to his arrogance, his thievery of creative work and his contempt for the human race he is also a disgusting sexual predator. As you have no doubt guessed, Barney Fein is a Harvey Weinstein-type character. No coincidence, Barney Fein rhymes nicely with Weinstein.

Mamet is a genius scriptwriter. He skillfully uses theatre to illustrate every trait of the Hollywood predator. The choice of John Malkovich as Barney Fein is genius. He sustains your attention and shows his character as both disgusting and amusing in equal parts. Malkovich, himself a Hollywood super star, has likely met a few Weinsteins in his career.

You’ll want to see Mamet’s Bitter Wheat not because it is a great play, because it isn’t, but because it is a true window into the sophisticated and manipulative role of Jewish humour.

Mamet skillfully gives life to his monstrous narcissist character. Barney Fein is astonishingly abrasive. He refers to himself as a Jew and displays every problematic symptom attributed to Jews by their enemies. By the end of the first half, some of the audience may harbor genuine anti-Semitic sentiments towards the main character. I assure you, these sentiments will be addressed with utmost care in the second half.

The second half begins after Barney Fein has gotten out of prison. He returns to his office to find that he is basically destroyed. Most everyone shuns him. No one will ever work with him again. If this were not bad enough, his mother has died in a ‘terror attack’ but not before she changed her will to bequeath his production company to Greenpeace and the Mossad. The second half is short and disappointing: it verges on miserable. The tension that was cleverly created in the first half evaporates as the play transforms into banal Jewish parody. Barney’s disastrous symptoms morph into comic traits. Barney is dangerous no more, he is merely an absurd satirical act, a victim of his own symptoms.

As much as Mamet is dexterous in his art form, he isn’t too original here. Owning one’s symptoms is the new Jewish American trend.

ORDER IT NOW

The Israeli historian Shlomo Sand pointed out that traditional Jewish humour, would be better described as ‘Yiddish humour,’ Sand noted that Albert Einstein, Kafka and Spinoza did not spend much time cracking Yiddish jokes about their surrounding human landscape. What we regard as Jewish humour is largely a Yiddish, folkish cult. It was the means by which the Ostjuden (Eastern Jews often described as ‘Yiddish People’) dealt with their ordeal. Most 19th century Yiddish jokes centered on a narrative in which the ordinary Jew outsmarted the dummkopf Goy. There are endless variations on this somewhat racially- orientated theme but always it is the Jew who wins out, leaving the poor, befuddled Goy confused by his own gullibility.

Of course this was not the reality on the ground. It was not the Gentile who was left behind but the Ostjuden. It was the Eastern Jew who was surrounded by ghetto walls and oppressed by a hostile environment.

Nineteenth century Yiddish humour allowed the Yiddish-speaking Eastern Jew to identify with the Western Ashkenazi elite and look down on his local gentile oppressors. A joke allowed an Eastern Jew to elevate himself to the rank of a Rothschild or a Warburg.

While Jewish humour is always political, in that it always conveys a social, ideological and spiritual message, 20th century American Jewish humor has radically transformed the message. Instead of ridiculing the gullible Goy, modern American Jewish humour is there to own the Jewish symptom. Woody Allen mocks the Zelig chameleon character . Larry David’s ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm’ ridicules the self-centred hedonist Hollywood character. Mel Brooks exaggerates Jewish symptoms ad absurdum and Sarah Silverman confessed that she “wants to kill Christ again.”

These Jewish comedians have made self-deprecation into an art form. By sarcastically mocking Jewish stereotypes, they disarm opposition to or criticism of Jewish dominance and political power. By openly owning what some regard as problematic Jewish symptoms, these entertainers manage to dismantle, or at least, suppress the dissent. When the so-called ‘anti-Semite’ accuses the Jew of being hedonistic, self-centred, a capitalist, usurious, a Christ killer, pro immigration and even a sex predator, David, Allen, Silverman Brooks and Mamet’s answer is simply: ‘Okay, now tell us something we don’t know.’

—-

To learn more about controlling dissent and the role of Jewish humour read Being in Time – A Post political Manifesto

(Republished from Gilad Atzmon by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Harvey Weinstein, Jews 
Hide 70 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Sean says:

    When the so-called ‘anti-Semite’ accuses the Jew of being hedonistic, self-centred, a capitalist, usurious, a Christ killer, pro immigration and even a sex predator, David, Allen, Silverman Brooks and Mamet’s answer is simply: ‘Okay, now tell us something we don’t know

    Jews will acquiesce in calumnies against them because playing dirty is not their secret. Lots of people think it is and these are the ones who would have bought the Arnold Schwarzenegger arm course because they thought his biceps were like that because of his special exercises There is one thing that Jewish intellectuals will never accept is true even though it is obvious and that is Jews are superior in intelligence, which is why their comedians are soooo funny.

    Extract from The Rialto Report interview with Josh Alan Friedman, ‘Al Goldstein: Screw Midnight Blue, and Fuck You’, (February 23rd, 2014)

    “I vividly remember when Seka first headlined at the Melody Burlesk. She drew in a crowd. The line went right down the stairs out to the street. Seka sat spread-eagled onstage, and men would line up to give her a lick for one dollar. I just thought, “This would be great – if you were first on line.”

    Stephen Jay Gould’s books especially, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (1989) were quite clear that evolution was an endless series of contingent one–off happenings and intelligence was a spandrelly appurtenance not the supreme weapon in the struggle for existence, which Jews had in abundance. Extremely savage criticism came Goulds way from Conway Morris, a professor of paleobiology at the University of Cambridge,who was vehement that evolution was not meandering, but strongly constrained. The IQ controversy was more muted, but white gentile paleontologists could not understand what Gould was getting at.

    https://www.therialtoreport.com/2014/07/13/the-melody-burlesk-and-the-harmony-dominiques-story/ “Well, let’s check it out. Let’s call the lawyer.” I called our attorney, Harvey Slovis, and said “Harvey, they’re doing it in ‘Cats’ – why can’t we?” He said, “Ok, I can defend that. Go ahead. Let them off stage”.

    Extract from ‘A Schitzy Girl is like a Melody’ from ‘Tales of Times Square’, by Josh Alan Friedman (1986) “By law, theaters presenting a drama or comedy must charge sales tax on the ticket; but musical performances are exempt. At stake was a quarter-mil in back taxes. The guys at the audit said, “You’re not musical performances, you’re pornography”, explains Kronish. I said “This is the Melody – we can’t operate without music, so what the hell do you call it? I says, ‘Who are you to say this is porn, you’re a sales tax man, you can’t decide what’s naughty or nice”.

    Harvey Weinstein was our landlord. Back then he owned the Paradise Arcade which had the first video game machines. He also owned Mama Leone’s restaurant which was down the block. Harvey was a nice guy but he’d increase our rent as he saw we were doing such good business. I’d pay him the rent in cash each month. When he came to collect, I’d run up to him, give him a big hug, jump in his lap, and fan his face with the $16,000 rent money while he smiled broadly. He always dealt with us directly. Every year, he’d come in and say, “Do you want to buy the building?” At first he wanted $3,500,000 and I didn’t have that yet. .. and the price would keep going up.

    We were on a month to month contract. … He sold the building for $35,000,000 to Holiday Inn. They’re still there now. Harvey came over and said, “I sold the building. This is it. You’re out. You got a month to leave.” That was in 1988. He then went on to Miramax with all that money.

    Jews find the loopholes and as businessmen they grind you down because they are more intelligent due to their DNA being more filtered by natural selection for intelligence .The supreme resource for getting women (plural) is wealth. Endogamy plus concern with a history of high intelligence in the family of the bride created people with an unbeatable advantage in life.

    Mr Atzmon does not want to believe all this, he prefers to think that the ancient law of Judaism introduced an exclusive tribal double morality into the world, and Jews go through other societies like a blowtorch through butter because they lack ethical principles and empathy when dealing with gentiles. Which they can usually laugh off. I don’t think conflict between groups is a bad thing, any more that conflict between the alliance of cells called human beings is. War between nation states is just a higher level of natural selection that created empires or power bloks

    An increase in pure intelligence is actually a lot more dangerous than ethnocentric aggression, because at a certain stage intelligence is self defeating (why else would Fermi’s paradox exist). Jews invented nuclear weapons,they have been around a while so probably don’t explain the aforementioned paradox. It’s probabally Artificial Intelligence getting too intelligent to be controlled. Eliezer Yudkowsky say Alpha Zero may be the the kind of thing that has happened many times across the Universe fifty years–or five years– before that world ends. The chief engineer on Apha Zero is Jewish. So it’s probabally going to be closer to five years. Or maybe Gould was right and the Universe has never had any intelligent life in it apart from us.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @AnonStarter
    , @PPB
  2. Al Liguori says: • Website

    …and murderous too. Perpetrators of genocide since ancient times, not victims.

    • Replies: @Wally
  3. Kelso says:

    Best line Mamet ever wrote is in the slapstick play “Romance.”
    The line is, more or less, “A Jew can’t order a cheeseburger without invoking the Holocaust.”
    Jews manage to slip the Hoax in no matter what. Even Mamet does it!

    • Agree: Wally
  4. Hunter says:

    Here’s Larry David on “Saturday Night Live” talking about Jewish sexual predators…

  5. By sarcastically mocking Jewish stereotypes, they disarm opposition to or criticism of Jewish dominance and political power. By openly owning what some regard as problematic Jewish symptoms, these entertainers manage to dismantle, or at least, suppress the dissent. When the so-called ‘anti-Semite’ accuses the Jew of being hedonistic, self-centred, a capitalist, usurious, a Christ killer, pro immigration and even a sex predator, David, Allen, Silverman Brooks and Mamet’s answer is simply: ‘Okay, now tell us something we don’t know.’

    I’m not sure about that. One need not be anantisemite (or whatever) to recoil in disgust over these characteristics. If one is articulate in his antipathy toward Jews (as a group), he would just calmly retort: OK, you are pigs who wallow in their pigsty & know you’re pigs. But- it doesn’t make you less disgusting & less swinish.

  6. Unfortunately the play is in England.

    Appreciating Mr. Mamet as I do, when it gets here — on my to do list.

  7. Hunter says:

    Whoops! Here’s is that Larry David bit:

  8. So Jewish people are like the rest of us. It’s not healthy for any community for its cultural leaders to extol the worst of human traits as either excusable or even exemplary for themselves.

    • Replies: @Tsigantes
  9. Wally says:
    @Sean

    said:
    “that is Jews are superior in intelligence, which is why their comedians are soooo funny.”

    Really? If Jews were really so smart they would have conjured up a better, more believable story than their impossibly fake & stupid ‘6,000,000 & gas chambers’.

    Laughing Mexican Guy and the Fake 6 Million Jews:


  10. Wally says:
    @Al Liguori

    A must see:
    Complete list of Jewish Expulsions / Jews expelled from over 1,000 places in history:
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12596

    excerpt:

    They (Jews) literally want people to believe that anti-Semitism is just something that manifests itself out of the ether. … this does not appear to be the case, as Jews have been kicked out of virtually every country they have ever inhabited at one point or another.
    Jewish supremacists claim that they are “God’s chosen people” and a “light unto the world”, but the historical consensus, according all of the people among whom they have dwelled, is quite the opposite.

    • Agree: Theodore
  11. @Sean

    News Flash: Jews have been bred for intelligence — an inheritable trait.

    Which is usually mistaken for wisdom.

    If they can’t make the distinction, then perhaps they’re not as intelligent as they imagine themselves to be.

    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
  12. This article is good (although I don’t agree, at least in part, with its conclusion). The best piece is to identify so-called Jewish humor with ethnic Yiddish humor. My take is that Yiddish & American Jewish humor are somehow unhealthy, not only aggressive, but there is something about them not just ethnically jaundiced, but even more ….dirty? Not clean or cleansed. You get bogged into a morass of vulgar neuroticism.

    When I, now & then, read comments sections of Jewish & Israeli newspapers in English, I notice the absence of-humor. Everything is dead serious & literal. Commenters differ (left, center, right, nationalists, liberals,..), but they’re all boring & dull.

    You’ll find much more fun if you go to Yahoo comments & just read outrageous word-plays or popular culture free associations that will make you spill your coffee wile reading. Americans, real Americans, are heirs to Mark Twain & Bret Harte.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @The Cruncher
  13. Anonymous[402] • Disclaimer says:

    These Jewish comedians have made self-deprecation into an art form. By sarcastically mocking Jewish stereotypes, they disarm opposition to or criticism of Jewish dominance and political power.

    I don’t think so. Most of them are reveling in their ownership of the goyim which produces the opposite result. Maybe you didn’t notice, but very few among the goyim are laughing now.

  14. Anonymous[402] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    I agree. Most Jewish “humour” is dull and mean – like their “culture”.

  15. ‘…Of course this was not the reality on the ground. It was not the Gentile who was left behind but the Ostjuden. It was the Eastern Jew who was surrounded by ghetto walls and oppressed by a hostile environment.

    Nineteenth century Yiddish humour allowed the Yiddish-speaking Eastern Jew to identify with the Western Ashkenazi elite and look down on his local gentile oppressors. A joke allowed an Eastern Jew to elevate himself to the rank of a Rothschild or a Warburg…’

    The implication here is that the average Jew of Poland, the Pale, et al was materially worse off than his gentile neighbors. Was this actually the case?

  16. anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    Yes the Jews in that area were very poor.

  17. utu says:

    ‘Okay, now tell us something we don’t know.’

    Obviously Mamet engages in defusing the bomb by normalizing it. It is not a bomb because we can talk about it and even make jokes about it. Just like Larry David when at SNL addressed the Weinstein crisis by making a joke about Holocaust.

  18. Svevlad says:

    So their humor is Balkan tier?

    Reminds me of that one joke involving an Serb, an American and oversized agricultural products

  19. PPB says:
    @Sean

    ” …at a certain stage intelligence is self defeating …”

    True enough, if intelligence develops as a kind of independent variable, uncoupled from other human qualities that would hold it in balance and in check, and naturally guide it toward beneficial rather than destructive ends. Another commenter highlighted the distinction between intelligence and wisdom, and we could also include other related qualities such as depth of insight (including self-knowledge), magnanimity, sincerity, courage, integrity, concern for others, etc. as part of that mix, while not forgetting warmth and humor to give all of these a nice, rounded edge.

    Any culture that discourages the cultivation of this full range of human qualities will inevitably betray its lack of wholeness in one way or another, and remain a distorted and fragmentary (and often degraded) expression of what it otherwise could be.

    • Agree: Sean McBride
    • Replies: @Sean
  20. Sean says:
    @PPB

    Those are all female characteristics. Even courage in the sense of fortitude in the face of adversity is, for childbirth is more painful and physically traumatising than anything a man willingly undergoes. Men are only more courageous when it come to attacking other people for the purpose of greater status. Those insects with collective intelligence and castes of sterile male workers did away with the problem of the arrogant aggressive male striving for dominance. But Stepford husbands would be boring for the ladies and we would still be living in mud huts if inventing stuff was left to the sex that just wants everything to be serene. Conflict is fruitful, because usually it is kept within limits.

    Jews are very slightly more like termites, the males being less interested in butting heads. However that just makes their males all the more likely to invent something too super intelligent to be controlled because it lacks limits to its ends and the means it can employ. Any number of purposes are predicated on not ceasing to exist, and a superintelligence will perceive that. So whatever goals it has, they must converge on the destruction of humanity.

    • Replies: @PPB
  21. When will it finally become illegal for white people to erroneously and lyingly claim that they are ‘Semites’ and thus entitled to special treatment ? Even their fictitious Semite god would be angry and kick their white honky asses for the lie and the abuse they heap upon real Semites if indeed their god was real.The only reason they could own slaves in the south or control banks in racist 19th century Europe was because they were white people.Do the Rothschilds look like ‘Semites’ ? Does Menachem Atzmon or Ezra Harel who controlled Logan Airport Boston on 9/11 look like a ‘Semite’ ?

    9-11 Archive 2014 – Christopher Bollyn
    http://www.bollyn.com/9-11-archive-2014/
    Nov 6, 2014 – Gilad was quite honest and said he was indeed related to Menachem Atzmon, as well as Nathan Yellin-Mor, Janet Yellen, and Tzipi Livni

  22. Of course this was not the reality on the ground. It was not the Gentile who was left behind but the Ostjuden. It was the Eastern Jew who was surrounded by ghetto walls and oppressed by a hostile environment.

    Your ignorance regarding history of Eastern European Jewry is really astonishing. For a person who claims to be an ex-Jew who cured himself of hagada, you still adhere to and propagate quite a number of Jewish myths.

    Hostility towards host population and separation have always been the main features of Judaism. But so have been the gaslighting of the goyim with terms like “ghetto walls” and “hostile environment” being primal examples of it. It’s sad to see you participate in this evil doing.

  23. PPB says:
    @Sean

    Whence this jaundiced view of maleness, as though the aforesaid attrubutes can’t equally assume a masculine expression? I sense that your view of human existence and social dynamics is primarily Darwinian. I guess that’s one window through which to look upon things and analyze them, but as a credo or attitude to live by? One might then wonder why a specifically human consciousnees and intelligence developed at all.

    “Any number of purposes are predicated on not ceasing to exist, and a superintelligence will perceive that. So whatever goals it has, they must converge on the destruction of humanity.”

    I’m not sure how the conclusion in the second sentence follows from its premise in the first, but are you suggesting that superintelligence is inherently directed towards pulling the rug out from under itself? A more fruitful way of doing the same might be for that intelligence to first examine its own underpinnings.

  24. @Colin Wright

    Absolutely not. In Poland, in 1939, Jews constituted about 10% of population yet controlled more than 90% of retail and overall more than half of the economy.

  25. “It was the means by which the Ostjuden (Eastern Jews often described as ‘Yiddish People’) dealt with their ordeal.”

    What is this crap? Ordeal? What ordeal?

    Jews in Eastern Europe were by and large predatory on the domestic population. Simply go read one of the hundreds of books out there written by Polish Jews on life in Poland before WW2. Jews vilified Poles, spat when they walked by their churches, took over all the major shops in the village centers, engaged in usury, and pushed alcohol on the peasantry as a means of eventually taking over their land.

    In response the Poles were pretty friendly. The Chinese would have strung up Jews from lampposts for that sort of behaviour.

    Jews formed ghettoes wilfully, punishing their children for fraternizing with the goys. (The exception being Germans, who were held by Polish Jews as being superior to the dumb, brutelike Poles).

  26. @I_destroy_liars

    ‘Absolutely not. In Poland, in 1939, Jews constituted about 10% of population yet controlled more than 90% of retail and overall more than half of the economy.’

    Do you have some sources for that? Also, any material on what the relative economic situation actually was in second half of the nineteenth century?

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  27. The Chosen admit everything they’re accused of doing through movies in a documentary — the film version of the book An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood. (Canadian title: Hollywoodism.) First they claim to have invented onscreen an idealistic white picket fence America that’s never (they assert) existed in fact, then they admit they’ve perverted it all with liberalism, then they excuse themselves in the usual way — whining about “anti-Semitism”.

    Interviewees include some of the Classic Hollywood producers and writers themselves, film professors, critics et al — and they don’t all look equally convinced of the propaganda they’re spouting. They claim the Chosen have given us our world and then demand that we forgive them for ruining it because hey, Jews are persecuted and stuff. They use tactics like confessing to promoting communism through cinema (showing scenes from Song of Russia etc) and then pillorying the McCarthy hearings (showing some footage of them) as a totally groundless pogrom against poor innocent all-American entertainment figures.

    It’s enough to recall the old hyuk-hyuk definition of chutzpah: a boy convicted of axe-murdering his parents throws himself on the court’s mercy on the grounds that he’s a helpless orphan :-6

  28. @I_destroy_liars

    Do you have any data on those claims? Jews were so poor in those Shtetls. They had their own yeshivas and early education system but that was it. This was true in the Pale settlement in Russia.
    There were some wealthy Jewish merchants, for the most part it was Fiddler on the Roof.
    They moved around a lot, and eked out a living. The key to their success was they were educated more then the poor non Jews.

    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
  29. @Colin Wright

    You can google that stuff. The whole entire wealth of the Jews is so exaggerated by the Neo Nazis on these web pages.
    By and large the Jews in the 19th and 20th centuries in Eastern Europe, with the exception of maybe Germany were very poor.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  30. R.G. Camara says: • Website
    @AnonStarter

    Vox Day has pointed out quite convincingly that the “Jewish Intelligence” factor is well overstated.

    Many believe Jews have an average IQ of 115+ to the White’s 100, but that’s incorrectly based on one study of a small number of Askenazi; its simply been repeated ad naseum. Askenazi IQ is likely an average of 105+– still above the average white IQ of 100 — but nothing super-insurmountable, especially given that Sephardic and Mizrahi IQ’s were not part of the sample size and have long been observed to be less intelligent overall than their Askenazi cousins –which is why Ashkenazi Jews dominate Israel’s power positions.

    Anyway, a 5-point average IQ difference would tend to show Askenazi being slightly more wealthy on average than whites and slightly more powerful per capita – but not to the extreme scale we see in this country.

    No, the issue is not IQ, but exploitation. Jews are far more ruthless and exploitative and monopolistic in favor of their own kind than whites. It’s a tale as old as time—Whites view Jews as hucksters who trick them, Jews view Goyim as dumb hicks to be exploited by their ruses. Which is why national leaders of the past with high IQs who saw through the ruses protected their people by sharply regulating Jewish and White interaction to prevent their fellow countrymen from being exploited by the clannish Jews.

    It also explains why Jews never really penetrated certain societies such as Ireland (as is staed in Ulysses), where the strong-clannish structures mirrored their own and thus kept outsiders from exploiting them. In societies where clannishness was broken down (almost always cities), exploitation could work better.

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
    , @Al Liguori
  31. R.G. Camara says: • Website
    @Fran Taubman

    Dude—so a bunch of foreigners with no ties to the nation or land they lived in decided to stay in a foreign land where they were both dirt poor and legally oppressed, instead of moving back to their homeland or finding a more hospitable place? This all despite the fact that the localpopulations were eager to have the foreigners leave?

    The myth of the “poor oppressed Jew” is a nice fairy tale to tell yourself as a child to justify disliking the goyim, but it makes no sense and ignores literally every goyim complaint about Jews throughout the centuries.

    The truth is Jews stayed in foreign goyim lands because they made good lives for themselves, making money on banking and lawyering and other allowed (and sometimes not allowed) methods, doing things goyim wouldn’t do or else monopolizing an area of business and excluding non-Jews in favor of their own. Jewish exploitation and racism against the local goyim sometimes got so bad the locals rebelled physically and politically. It’s a predictable cycle that explains every Jewish move to a new land and later explusion/pogram/oppression. Heck, the Bible itself shows this—at the end of Genesis, the Jews are prosperous in Egypt, more so than the local Egyptians, and then, by the beginning of Exodus, the Jews have been oppressed into slavery by the Egyptians. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see the pattern—Jews come in , become wealthy, overstep their bounds, the locals get jealous, and the Egyptians took the wealth back and made them slaves.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  32. The myth of the “poor oppressed Jew” is a nice fairy tale to tell yourself as a child to justify disliking the goyim, but it makes no sense and ignores literally every goyim complaint about Jews throughout the centuries.

    Why did 2 million of them immigrate to the US like my ancestors. They were poor and could not earn a living. It is just facts. The lives of those people in Poland and the Pale settlement are well documented.
    Just like your IQ argument. You are living proof of the lower level.

  33. @R.G. Camara

    Perhaps 30% of your rant is true; Jews tend to whine about their position, while in reality their circumstances were better than that of native Poles, from. 15th C to 19th C.

    On the other hand, there was no conspiracy of Jews anywhere, this is a fairy tale. Also, the Egypt story in the Bible (Joseph, Moses,.)- all fairy tales.

    Shahak’s short book on classical Judaism is still the best on the issue.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
    , @R.G. Camara
  34. @Bardon Kaldian

    For all you Holoax people. Israel Shahak was a survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto lost his whole family.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  35. @Fran Taubman

    What this has to do with major premises of his book? It can be download from here (click on the picture > get> download): http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=E4808775BCD7F1E1044F8E39FFE5D788

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  36. By sarcastically mocking Jewish stereotypes, they disarm opposition to or criticism of Jewish dominance and political power.

  37. @Bardon Kaldian

    Nothing it is a favorite book of Jew haters, many of whom are Holocaust deniers.

  38. R.G. Camara says: • Website
    @Bardon Kaldian

    I’m sorry the 70% of reality you just denied hurts you so. But your living in fairy tales won’t help you here.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  39. @R.G. Camara

    Bullshit. All I can say is that usual Joo-Joo conspiracy is for idiots. I’ve written a few lines on MacDonald’s loony Joo conspiracy theories & there is no need to reinvent the wheel again.

    For obsessive misojudaists, Jews are as “successful” as pathogen viruses. All their exploits are parasitism & denigration of all higher values of human life. Their over-representation is as deadly ravages of the 14th C pest in Europe. Not a result of ability, but of cancerogenous mutability.

    Just:

    Jews are ethnic religious tribalists who had, many of them, lived in Europe for most than 2000 years. Somewhere during the Nero’s rule, they constituted ca 10% of Roman Empire, i.e. 5-6 million people. Have they had an opportunity for natural growth, there would have been ca. 250-400 million of them now. But, most of them assimilated, vanished into greater Pagan & then Christian communities. So much for stubborn insistence of religious-ethnic pride.

    There is no “group evolutionary strategy”, only if it stands for something trivial: any ethnic-national group wants to exist ad infinitum & prosper. This applies to every single human community.
    As for Jews being particularly ethno-centric, this may be the truth in comparison with some other groups, but they didn’t differ from Zoroastrian Iranians or Hindu Brahmins; there is no way to empirically verify whether their ethnocentrism is rooted in ancient religious texts older than 1500 years (Babylonian Talmud, 250-600 AD). No causal connection can be made & all this is bogus.

    With regard to MacDonald’s thesis that Jews are culturally-generically predisposed to domination in host societies, this is an easily refutable canard: they lived harmoniously, peacefully & productively during Parthian, Zoroastrian, Abbasid, Cordovan caliphates, Ottoman Empire…as well as in the 17th-18th C Netherlands or 18th C Prussia. They tried (and to a larger degree succeeded) to assimilate into British & German Empires, from the beginning to the end.

    MacDonald’s (and yours) theses are very simple & cannot pass the test of any rational & empirical investigation.

    1. Jews are essentially, due to a compound of genes, history, religious ideology,… eternal enemy of “white race”. Nonsense. They lived among Europeans for almost 2 millennia & had virtually always been at the history’s receiving end. After their Enlightenment at the end of the 18th C, they avidly secularized themselves & were literally hungry for the riches of high European culture (arts, sciences, technology, ..), trying to assimilate as fast as they could. No “evolutionary group strategy” here, not anything that would preserve them as an alien dominant cultural-biological ethnicity..

    2. Jews are far from a monolith existing in MacDonald fantasy. It is true they, those of them who still possess Jewish identity, try to help their co-religionists if they are in trouble (which is a perfectly normal behavior). But, their primary loyalty is to their host societies, which can be seen from German Jewish behavior during WW1, when their military deaths were higher than their percentage in the population. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judenz%C3%A4hlung French Jews fought for France, British for Britain etc.

    3. according to MacDonald, Jews are basically destructive to a host society, like a group of pathogen bacteria swarming & sucking life out their host-victim. They’re, actually, not unlike a cancer. Another example of dehumanization & antisemitic nonsense. What about good they’ve done to their host societies, in culture, wealth, inventions, development of commerce, journalism, agriculture, arts,..

    4. last MacDonald’s myth is about their extraordinarily high levels of endogamous practice. In reality, Catholic and Protestants didn’t mix much until the 20th C, and Jews (not converts) have been in mixed marriages with German Christians at the rate of 40%, during 1933 (Hitler’s rise to power); now, more than 60% of Jews outmarry and more than 80-90% of them do so in Russia. Where is this MacDonald’s grand “evolutionary strategy”?

    Or, after all, Einstein (whose descendants are not Jews) was right: If it were not for antisemitism, Jews would have dispersed like leaves in the wind.

  40. Saggy says: • Website
    @Bardon Kaldian

    In reality, Catholic and Protestants didn’t mix much until the 20th C, and Jews (not converts) have been in mixed marriages with German Christians at the rate of 40%, during 1933 (Hitler’s rise to power); now, more than 60% of Jews outmarry and more than 80-90% of them do so in Russia.

    Probably the best book on the Jewish conspiracy is Douglas Reed’s ‘The Controversy of Zion’, and he traces it from the Babylonian exile to WW II.

    According to Reed the western Jews in Europe and the eastern Jews in Russia developed independently in the 1800s, and the western Jews were on the point of assimilating. But the eastern Jews resisted the Russian efforts at integration (which began as the Jews were emancipated in Europe following the French revolution) and remained insular and completely controlled by the Jewish elite. The western and eastern Jews came into conflict at the end of the century with Herzl representing the eastern Jews, and the influence of the western Jews disappeared with the eastern Jews dominating Zionism and Judaism from that point on, with the emphasis again on separation and now the actual fulfillment of the return to Jerusalem and world domination.

  41. Tsigantes says:
    @Fran Macadam

    So Jewish people are like the rest of us.

    The rest of who exactly?
    Jews are of course like the rest of mankind, being human beings. But too many ascribe to a group psychology and mythology that they believe sets them apart and gives them unique privileges up to and including mass murder, well described elsewhere.

    In the context of today’s western scientism they attribute that to having a higher “intelligence”. In the past there was probably some other reason. Gilad himself uses the bell curve to say that the extreme ends of the jewish spectrum exhibit higher intelligence. But I wonder who these geniuses are. The genocidal Rabbi Schneerson? The propagandist “historian” Bernard Lewis who was avoided at SOAS? The Rothschilds who have used money for 250 years to subvert governments to their bidding, create revolutions and wars, dominate world currency? [As if others couldn’t have done this…and why did they choose not to?) The satanic Leo Strauss? All this to what end? Does a coordinated network really constitute “intelligence”?

    None of these people have created anything worthwhile or added anything to the greater good, but much evil.. What we are looking at is simply a mafia with financial players, religious players, academic, media etc. Working toward the usual mafia ends…money & power. Needing each other to achieve it. No shining lights here!

    As for the examples of jewish humour given above amid a hollywood obsessveness, this so called humour is exclusively aimed at Americanised audiences and doesn’t extend beyond that. Here in southeastern Europe it doesn’t look funny but simply weird….ie sick, mentally ill.

    • Agree: utu, bjondo
  42. Tsigantes says:

    More to the point, and remarkably , in this present “issue” of Unz Report there are several articles discussing the same sorts of conspiratorial behaviour as displayed by the group under discussion in Atzmon’s article above – these include the JFK assassination, MKUltra, Manson, Laurel Canyon, LSD, Oswald, Ruby, 911, Epstein, Pizzagate (and by extension Russiagate) etc – all involving “intelligence” agencies. Yet no one is rushing either in these texts or the comments to bless these goings on as highly intelligent or as a product of super human intelligence. No, they are simply evil and illegal…perpetrated on the public for political ends that are subversive and evil in themselves. Evil being the most important point.

    Does no one else see the similarity?

    Perhaps we should start drawing a distinction between “intelligence” as conspiracy and intelligence as intellectual capacity. Furthermore, as mentioned above intelligence (a neutral) does not equate to wisdom (a good).

  43. schrub says:

    “On the other hand, there was no conspiracy of Jews anywhere, this is a fairy tale.”

    Really? Let me give you two takeovers of entire industries by Jews here in the USA.

    The first is the movie business in Hollywood. Until the government intervened in the mid 1930s, the Jews had managed to get entire control of the movie business. This was not the result of Jewish brilliance or cleverness. They did this by having previously also gotten a monopoly control of the the theaters that the movies were shown in.

    Prior to this government antitrust intervention, a gentile movie producer could only get his move shown if it were shown in a Jewish owned theater. Since Jews gave preference to fellow Jews, it often became impossible for a gentile producer to get his movie shown at all. As a result, gentile movie pioneer studio owners (like Max Sennett) and their companies either simply disappeared or these previous owners could only get jobs as directors or at best producers of movies made in Jewish owned studios (Cecil B. DeMille).

    By the time the government had intervened in the mid 1930s after years of complaints, it was simply too late for the gentile movie pioneers.

    In the present day we find that gentiles are increasingly being squeezed out of ownership positions in the extremely profitable major professional sport teams franchises. All five of the commissioners of these major sports are now Jews. Gentile owners of sports teams are now being openly harassed by these Jewish commissioners (undoubtedly with the support of Jewish owners).

    This first started happening a few decades also when owner Marge Schott was forced to relinquish her ownership of the Cinncinati Reds baseball team because of Jewish pressure simply because of a relatively innocent comment she made. Curiously enough, she was forced to sell at far below market value..

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marge_Schott

    During the recent congressional elections, a gentile owner of a sports team in San Francisco came under intense criticism and pressure for simply having made a small political contribution to a “unfavored” Republican congressional candidate in the state of Mississippi. Instead of defending his right to make this contribution, he tried to get his contribution returned because of threats of a player boycott and a threat of boycotts of his other companies.

    https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/11/28/editorial-giants/

    Another gentile basketball team owner had an relatively inconsequential (i.e non racial) altercation with a black player. The Jewish commissioner used this event to not only fine him a significant amount of money ($500K) but to suspend him for a year as an owner.

    https://sports.yahoo.com/the-fan-who-pushed-kyle-lowry-in-game-3-was-warriors-partowner-mark-stevens-162900716.html.

    Such a severe punishment would simply never have meted out to a Jewish owner for such a minor event. Never. The commissioner simply wanted to publicly humiliate this gentile owner to make him realize that he was no longer welcome.

    I predict that within just a few years professional sports will turn into yet another entirely Jewish owned monopoly, just like the entertainment business before it.

    No conspiracy, huh!

    I also think the Jewish pressure on large scale Republican political contributors will only continue to increase. This pressure wil be applied to any gentiles who dare to contribute to “unapproved” candidates who voices any traditional values.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  44. anonymous[251] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    By and large the Jews in the 19th and 20th centuries in Eastern Europe, with the exception of maybe Germany were very poor.

    which logically explains all the lawsuits by jews demanding return of their property, art, buildings, currency, metals, etc.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  45. @R.G. Camara

    /Anyway, a 5-point average IQ difference would tend to show Askenazi being slightly more wealthy on average than whites and slightly more powerful per capita – but not to the extreme scale we see in this country./

    I might agree with this, though it remains true that Jews breed future generations for intelligence, an attribute they covet in a strictly Darwinian sense.

    It really doesn’t matter if I.Q. is a factor in their worldly success, since I.Q. scores are no indication of morality.

  46. @anonymous

    They are not demanding return from migrant Jews from Eastern Europe and Russia. I said that the Jews in Germany, France and perhaps other pockets of Europe maybe be demanding return of their STOLEN ART from the Nazis who gained profit from selling it. Seems fair to me.
    Property?
    But again the Eastern Europeans were poor with dirt floors etc. They were educated, and became successful in the US, and South America.

  47. Anonymous[851] • Disclaimer says:
    @schrub

    Great post. Another example is the current purging of the UK’s political class of any “antisemites”. We’re watching in real time open Jewish enslavement of the goyim “representatives” in that country.

  48. @Bardon Kaldian

    You’d enjoy reading these quotes from Maurice Samuels , an early 20th century Jew on the differences between Jews and Gentiles, who said the same thing – that Jews don’t play. https://www.darkmoon.me/2014/key-quotations-from-you-gentiles-by-maurice-samuel

    Especially his comments on how sport is central to the European character.

    “THE most amazing thing in your life, the most in contrast with ours, is its sport. By this I do not mean simply your fondness for physical exercise, your physical exuberance, but the psychological and social institutionalization of sport, its organization, its predominant rôle as the outlet and expression of your spiritual energies.” (p. 38)

    “Your spirit is sport: particularly your young men, who are not yet absorbed in the struggle for existence, and whose emotions are therefore for the largest part free, must find in sport, in games, in contests, the most satisfactory expression of their instincts.” (p. 40)

    “The contention of the majority of your educators, that the moral instinct is trained on the football and baseball field, in boxing, rowing, wrestling and other contests, is a true one, is truer, perhaps, than most of them realize. Your ideal morality is a sporting morality. The intense discipline of the game, the spirit of fair play, the qualities of endurance, of good humor, of conventionalized seriousness in effort, of loyalty, of struggle without malice or bitterness, of readiness to forget like a sport – all these are brought out in their sheerest and cleanest starkness in well-organized and closely regulated college sports. And on the experiences and lessons which these sports imply your entire spiritual life is inevitably founded.” (p. 42)

    “Sport is for you a serious spiritual matter. It is the proper symbolization, the perfect ritual, wherein your spiritual forces, finding expression, also find exercise and sustenance.” (p. 43)

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  49. @The Cruncher

    I looked up the Maurice Samuels book on the differences between the Jews and Gentiles. Very interesting. I think what strikes me is how baked into the cake the differences are as in DNA. That the two peoples are irreconcilable.
    The Jews came to this conclusion after WW2, thus the speed up to the creation of Israel started by the visionary Zionist. The Jews will fight to the death for that land, their Island separation from the Gentiles.
    In Israel the Jews “can play”.
    What to do about the Muslims who have irrational taken up the Medieval Roman Catholic Jew hatred line by line.

  50. niceland says:

    I think this is the third time I come across your thoughts about Jewish humor Mr Atzmon, at least some of your descriptions sound familiar.

    In my youth we had endless jokes about stupid foreigners where the Icelander always came out on top(!?) Perhaps this is as simple as one group making fun of others, or the rest. Irish v.s Englishmen. Danes v.s. Swedes, Liverpool v.s. Manchester… ? Key point, the Jews see (or saw) them selves as group and the rest follows.

    I tried a kind of “stand up comedy” when I was younger. Early on I discovered excellent trick to warm up the audience if I wasn’t sure were I stood so to speak. I started by making fun of my self, even to a degree the audience was a bit shocked by my candor. After that I could turn my guns to the audience, their area, town, company or association or whatever was the occasion for the party, without any hostility. It was all good. On my part this was insurance policy, not to be seen as arrogant. And I guess the crowd accepted; he made brutal jokes about him self and now he can make jokes about me! If you want to make a quick funny speech at birthday party this is one way to do it.

    This came to mind reading about the play. And yes, normalizing bad situation by making jokes about it not new. If there is a point to my ramblings it’s: I don’t see this as particular Jewish humor or methods.

  51. @Colin Wright

    The bigger implication is that there actually was a “holocaust”, but that it was Jew on Jew.

    A holocaust that was perpetrated by Western Jews, Hitler, Eichmann, Himmler, et al., upon Yiddish, Eastern Jews.

    The Yids were the ones required to wear yellow stars.
    The Jews who served the Third Reich as military officers did not wear yellow stars on their uniforms.
    Jewish financiers and industrialists serving the Third Reich did not wear yellow stars.

    “Six million” is still a fabrication. That specific number appeared in newspapers around the time of the Armenian genocide by the Turks, in the early 1900s.

    “Never let a crisis go to waste.”, Rahm Emanuel.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  52. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘But, their primary loyalty is to their host societies, which can be seen from German Jewish behavior during WW1, when their military deaths were higher than their percentage in the population. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judenz%C3%A4hlung French Jews fought for France, British for Britain etc.’

    But that’s changed. Look up Jewish deaths in Vietnam and Iraq.

    However they put it, Jews are ‘no longer loyal to their host societies’ in the same sense that they once were.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  53. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘…But, their primary loyalty is to their host societies, which can be seen from German Jewish behavior during WW1, when their military deaths were higher than their percentage in the population. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judenz%C3%A4hlung French Jews fought for France, British for Britain etc…’

    This is a good example of the perils of just accepting claims on faith.

    If you parse the actual numbers, you’ll find that the opposite is the case; fewer German Jews died in combat than their numbers in the population would suggest they should have.

    Twelve thousand German Jews died out of a total German Jewish population of 550,000, or just over two percent. Three percent of Germany’s population overall died in combat in the first world war.

    So Jews were under-represented, not over-represented.

    I wouldn’t read too much into this; combat deaths were probably concentrated among the peasantry and the scions of the landed aristocracy — two groups in which Jews wouldn’t be especially common. However, the figures are hardly particularly striking evidence of Jewish patriotism and devotion to country — although they are routinely cited as if they were.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  54. @Fran Taubman

    ‘…The Jews came to this conclusion after WW2, thus the speed up to the creation of Israel started by the visionary Zionist. The Jews will fight to the death for that land, their Island separation from the Gentiles.
    In Israel the Jews “can play”…’

    …but of course you can’t be bothered to move there yourself.

    Isn’t it strange how Jews with an authentic choice are almost invariably unwilling to move to Israel?

  55. @Fran Taubman

    ‘…What to do about the Muslims who have irrational taken up the Medieval Roman Catholic Jew hatred line by line.’

    Just totally irrational — no reason for it at all.

    Who could possibly mind being driven from their homes with fire and sword, stripped of all rights, being made untermenschen in their own land, subjected to daily humiliation and abuse, imprisoned, beaten, shot, and burnt alive at will?

    And they object. Go figure.

    • Agree: Al Liguori
    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  56. @R.G. Camara

    It also explains why Jews never really penetrated certain societies such as Ireland (as is staed in Ulysses), where the strong-clannish structures mirrored their own and thus kept outsiders from exploiting them. In societies where clannishness was broken down (almost always cities), exploitation could work better.

    Until the breakdown of the Irish Catholic family… and now we have this: http://judaism.is/ireland.html

  57. @Colin Wright

    A lie a total lie, there are 1.7 million Arab citizens of Israel a nation of laws.
    Arab lawyers, doctors, judges heads of hospitals. I guess if you repeat the same lies long enough you believe them why?

    Why don’t you go to Israel and see for yourself. Arabs are treated better there than in Muslim countries, look at the way the Palestinians are treated in Lebanon. They are kept in sewage conditions why? Or Saudi Arabia?

    Driven from their homes with fire and sword? Lol what have you been reading? Sounds Medieval

    Fact is if the Arabs had accepted the original partition plan as presented by the UN in 1948, they would be celebrating 71 years as a country called Palestine. They rejected the plan and declared war on Israel. What happened happens in all wars.

    Learn your history, you are amazingly ignorant. You can google the history of the land.
    It was barren, before the Jews got there, a desolate place. The Jews worked that land and formed a wonderful country full of creativity and innovation and what are they met with?
    Jihad, Jihad, Jihad. cause that is all those Muslims know how to do is create Jihad they are devoid of the necessary skills to coexist with the other, and educate and raise their children to be constructive forces.

    The arabs and Palestinians have no one to blame for their failures other then themselves and their stupid and corrupt leaders who have billions in Swiss accounts.
    There are thousands of acres of land being burnt by Jihadis everyday in Israel. If it were up to me I would throw them all out to Jordan. If you committed arson and rioted in Iran who would be hung the next day. True of any country over there in the ME. Treatment of people? Are you kidding. They behead you in Saudi Arabia for looking the wrong way.

    For sure there are radical Israelis who brake laws and go to jail but to say that the Palestinians are subjected to inhuman treatment on a daily basis is a lie.

  58. @Colin Wright

    Mostly all Jewish citizens served in WW2. There is a lot written about it. True of my family.
    I do not think Iraq and Vietnam are good examples.
    “Host country?” I do not think that is an accurate representation of the Jewish population in America. There is no American “Host”.

    The US is made up of all ethnic citizens and religions. Are Chinese Americans loyal to their “Host”.
    So inaccurate. What is an American host. Christian?

    Germany was full of Christian Germans, the Jews were not Germans. Host is accurate to describe the Jews of Europe. Not so in the US.

    That is why Israel was created. No more “Hosts” to deal with. Europe used to be Christian, by that very definition the Jews were outsiders. The Muslims have taken what used to be the Jews position as outsiders, only they are not contributing to their host countries the way the Jews did, by and large they are all on welfare and a drain to their host countries.

    You have no rational for anything you write, because you are not rational.. You are a Jew hater, the very definition of irrationality. 99% of what you all write on these comments is completely nuts. Devoid of any logical fact.

    Jews are not being hosted in the US. It is almost laughable if not so serious.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  59. @SaneClownPosse

    The Yids were the ones required to wear yellow stars.
    The Jews who served the Third Reich as military officers did not wear yellow stars on their uniforms.
    Jewish financiers and industrialists serving the Third Reich did not wear yellow stars.

    You really need to take a breather from life. You are either completely challenged intellectually, or just learned to read and write.
    There were no Jewish financiers and industrials serving the Third Reich. That is the whole point!!
    They were being rounded up for camps and deported. Life as they knew it ceased to exist.

    I am almost scared to ask what is the difference between a Yid and a Jew serving in the Third Reich.
    why don’t you talk these problem out with someone or google it.
    You need serious help. There were no Jews serving in the Third Reich as military officers. Hilarious.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  60. @Fran Taubman

    Poor Fran.

    I think literally everything in your post is a falsehood.

  61. @Fran Taubman

    Poor Fran.

    Now here, the grownups were talking about World War One. You appear to be under the impression we were referring to World War Two.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  62. @Fran Taubman

    Well you are deeply disturbed if you think it is false. Go there yourself. It is all true. No Israeli harms anyone for sport. War is war, and the Arab Muslim population has declared war on the Jews of Israel.
    Talk to Israelis open your mind. My whole family lives there. Why do you think I would hang around this hideous web site if not to make a stand. One of my families members moshav was totally destroyed arson., animals and all.

    Here is a good video to watch in your spare time, if you can unlock your twisted brain.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  63. @Colin Wright

    You referred to Iraq and Vietnam and the loyalty of the Jews to their host countries. You started out in WW1 but moved on from there with the same stupid Host vs. Alien argument.
    Doesn’t matter what you are referring to it is all bullshit
    You are completely clueless you know no real people who have dogs in this fight. No vets, no real anyone. If you did and talked to real people who lives are involved you might get to be semi intelligent and your responses would be more nuanced and grey.
    People are people they are the same everywhere.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  64. @Fran Taubman

    ‘…but moved on from there with the same stupid Host vs. Alien argument…’

    ? I said nothing of the sort. That isn’t my schtick at all.

    ‘…You are completely clueless you know…’

    You know, Fran, there are two people here who chronically abuse the knowledge and intelligence of their interlocutors.

    …you and Obwandiyag. And you’re both really stupid. Isn’t that ironic?

  65. @Fran Taubman

    ‘…My whole family lives there. Why do you think I would hang around this hideous web site if not to make a stand. One of my families members moshav was totally destroyed arson., animals and all…’

    Oh oh. Fran played the victim card. I guess that settles that.

    Yes Fran…and in 1943 the Polish Home Army burnt out those Germans who attempted to settle in Zamosc. Did you have a point?

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  66. @Fran Taubman

    ‘…You need serious help. There were no Jews serving in the Third Reich as military officers. Hilarious.’

    You know, Fran, there actually were such individuals.

    Fact. ‘SaneClownPosse’ reads something into it that isn’t there — but it is a fact.

  67. @Colin Wright

    more of a point then you have. WTF are you talking about.

    This from you

    But that’s changed. Look up Jewish deaths in Vietnam and Iraq.

    However they put it, Jews are ‘no longer loyal to their host societies’ in the same sense that they once were.

    • Replies: @Totalled Chevy Volt
  68. @Fran Taubman

    Is this tactical stupidity? You can agree or disagree with Colin, but it’s perfectly clear what he’s saying.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  69. @Totalled Chevy Volt

    Tactical Stupidity? LOL
    Have you followed the conversation. I know it is clear what he is saying. He said in the post before that he never said it or referred to it.

    ? I said nothing of the sort. That isn’t my schtick at all.

  70. @Colin Wright

    They were over-represented factoring in their class position.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gilad Atzmon Comments via RSS