
◄►◄❌►▲ ▼▲▼ • BNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
The piece also draws parallels between Maxwell's actions and broader patterns of dehumanization seen in various contexts, including the ongoing Palestinian tragedy. The author suggests that the indifference to human suffering exhibited by Maxwell and Epstein reflects a more extensive ideological and political malaise, particularly within certain circles associated with Zionism. This perspective posits that the treatment of individuals—be it young girls entangled in Epstein's web or Palestinians—exemplifies a systemic failure to recognize the value of human life in favor of personal or political gain.
The article further explores the troubling rhetoric of figures like Alan Dershowitz, a prominent lawyer and vocal advocate for Israel, who has faced accusations related to Epstein. Dershowitz’s comments about victims of sex trafficking, dismissing them as "admitted prostitutes," illustrate a dangerous mindset that undermines the complexities of consent and victimization in cases of sexual exploitation. Such language not only perpetuates victim-blaming but also raises questions about the moral and ethical responsibilities of those in positions of authority and influence. The implications of this dismissive attitude extend beyond individual cases, hinting at a broader societal issue regarding how victims are treated and understood.
Moreover, the article touches on allegations involving Israel's influence in American politics, including claims that the Israeli government used compromising information to manipulate U.S. leaders, exemplified by the purported blackmail of President Bill Clinton regarding his affair with Monica Lewinsky. This narrative, which has circulated since the late 1990s, adds a layer of intrigue to the Epstein saga, suggesting that the ties between powerful individuals and the political machinations surrounding them are deeply intertwined. The author concludes by asserting that Epstein was not merely a financier but a key player in a larger syndicate operating within American society, implicating a vast network of influential figures who may be beholden to Zionist interests. This perspective challenges readers to consider the broader implications of such relationships on American politics and society.
## I. Introduction
A. Vanity Fair article by Venessa Grigoriadis discusses Ghislaine Maxwell, a close associate of Jeffrey Epstein.
B. Highlights claims from multiple victims regarding Maxwell's involvement in Epstein's crimes.
## II. Ghislaine Maxwell's Role in Epstein’s Operation
A. Allegations of Maxwell recruiting girls for Epstein.
1. Sources claim she was an active participant in sexual activities.
2. Maxwell described her methods of recruiting underage girls.
a. Offered "phone jobs" with promises of money and a better life.
b. Targeted vulnerable locations like spas and trailer parks in Florida.
B. Maxwell’s dehumanizing attitude towards victims.
1. Reported to have referred to underage girls as “trash.”
2. Reflects a broader pattern of disregard for human life.
## III. The Maxwell Family Background
A. Historical context of Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine’s father.
1. Allegations of misconduct and exploitation of workers' pensions.
2. Past connections to intelligence services, specifically Mossad.
3. Investigated for war crimes related to World War II.
B. Suggestion of a familial pattern of moral disregard.
1. Ghislaine’s behavior may reflect her father's legacy.
## IV. Broader Implications of Disregard for Human Life
A. Comparison of Maxwell's actions to the Israeli policy towards Palestinians.
1. Allegations of institutional disregard for human life.
2. Suggests a cultural or ideological pattern of dehumanization.
## V. Alan Dershowitz's Controversial Statements
A. Dershowitz's defense against accusations of sexual misconduct.
1. Called one accuser an “admitted prostitute” and questioned her victimization.
2. Highlights a problematic narrative that blames victims.
B. Critique of his language as a former law professor.
1. Inappropriate framing of a child victim's circumstances.
2. Reflection of a broader cultural issue within elite circles.
## VI. Connections to Broader Political and Criminal Networks
A. Allegations against Leslie Wexner and his ties to Epstein.
1. Accusations surrounding Wexner's connection to a historic murder case.
2. Suggests complicity or involvement in serious crimes.
B. Claims of political leverage and blackmail involving Israel.
1. Daniel Halper's assertion of Israel blackmailing Bill Clinton.
a. Alleged use of tapes of Clinton’s private conversations as leverage.
b. Context of negotiations regarding Jonathan Pollard.
2. Past claims of Mossad collecting incriminating evidence for manipulation.
## VII. The Clintons and the Epstein Affair
A. Discussion of the Clintons’ potential ties to Epstein’s network.
B. Notion that many prominent figures may be embroiled in similar circumstances.
## VIII. Epstein as a Part of a Larger Syndicate
A. Characterization of Epstein as a figure within a vast criminal network.
1. Not merely a financier, but a facilitator of exploitation.
2. Suggests a systemic issue in American politics and culture.
B. Allegations of Zionist influence in American politics.
1. Claims that many politicians act under Zionist pressure.
2. Reflection on the political landscape and loyalty dynamics in the U.S.
## IX. Conclusion
A. Calls for reflection on American political figures and their allegiance.
B. Encouragement to question the motivations behind political actions.
C. Suggestion to engage with alternative narratives on the Epstein case and its broader implications.
## X. Further Resources
A. Links to interviews and podcasts for deeper exploration of the topics discussed.
1. Video interviews and podcasts that delve into Epstein's network.
2. Encouragement to understand the complexities of political and legal narratives surrounding the case.
This outline summarizes the key points of the article, providing a structured overview of the discussion surrounding Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and the broader implications of their actions within political and social contexts.
A few days ago Vanity Fair, the same outlet that once attempted to block the exposé of monster pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, published an article by Venessa Grigoriadis that provides some details of Epstein’s friend and alleged ‘co-conspirator’ Ghislaine Maxwell.
Multiple victims claim that Maxwell often brought girls to Epstein and that she was an active sexual participant as well. According to Vanity Fair, “a source close to Maxwell says she spoke glibly and confidently about getting girls to sexually service Epstein, saying this was simply what he wanted, and describing the way she’d drive around to spas and trailer parks in Florida to recruit them. She would claim she had a phone job for them, ‘and you’ll make lots of money, meet everyone, and I’ll change your life….’” Vanity Fair’s source added: “When I asked what she thought of the underage girls, she looked at me and said, ‘they’re nothing, these girls. They are trash.”
This is gossipy information, but it seems consistent with what we have learned about Epstein and his ring. Those familiar with Maxwell family history won’t be shocked that Maxwell is quoted calling the girls “trash.” Daddy Maxwell plundered the lifetime pensions of his workers for his own use. He was alleged to be a Mossad agent. Not many know that Daddy Maxwell was also under police investigation for war crimes just before he drowned. Metropolitan Detectives were preparing to interview Maxwell, once a decorated captain in the British army, about an allegation that he murdered the unarmed mayor of a German City back in 1945.
One may say ‘like father like daughter’. But the total dismissal of otherness and human life is not limited to the Maxwells. Those of us who follow the unfolding Palestinian tragedy are pretty familiar with the institutional disregard to human life that is symptomatic of Israeli policy and is supported by its forceful lobby around the world. The saga of disgraceful conduct on the part of Epstein and others in his orbit suggests that the dismissal of otherness is characteristic of a wide circuit of those affiliated ideologically, politically and spiritually with Zion.
During an interview with Miami news station WPLG Alan Dershowitz not only bashed one of his accusers, calling her an “admitted prostitute and a serial liar” but claimed that the then-teen was not victimized and in fact “made her own decisions in life.” I am not in a position to determine whether Dershowitz is guilty of sex crimes (which he denies) but this kind of language is the last thing you would expect from a retired Ivy League law professor. One wouldn’t imagine that a law ‘scholar’ would refer to an alleged victim of sex trafficking as ‘an admitted prostitute.’ Nor would one expect a veteran ‘law scholar’ to suggest that the child victim of sexual abuse by a registered sex offender was actually ‘making her own decisions in life.’ But this is exactly what we hear from Alan Dershowitz. No doubt one of the most vocal Zionist advocates around.
Watch the entire interview:
The disregard of others and the dismissal of human life, symptomatic of the Epstein Orbit, extends beyond ethnicity, religious barriers and class. Indeed, we read in various outlets that Leslie Wexner, long standing patron of Epstein, is accused by some of having some connection to the murder of Arthur Shapiro — a Jewish lawyer who was killed in a 1985 ‘mob-style murder’. Shapiro’s doomed soul was resurrected when the Columbus, Ohio Police released the controversial—and once believed destroyed—document investigating his death. Presumably Shapiro knew too much. And author Daniel Halper claims that Israel and its operators within American politics have not refrained from blackmailing even an American president.
According to Halper, Israel attempted to use tapes of former US president Bill Clinton’s steamy sex chats with intern Monica Lewinsky to leverage the release of Jonathan Pollard. Halper claims that during the Wye Plantation talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, held in Maryland in 1998, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pulled Bill Clinton aside to press for Pollard’s release. “The Israelis present at Wye River had a new tactic for their negotiations–they’d overheard Clinton and Monica and had it on tape. Not wanting to directly threaten the powerful American president, a crucial Israeli ally, Clinton was told that the Israeli government had thrown the tapes away. But the very mention of them was enough to constitute a form of blackmail,” Halper wrote, “according to information provided by a CIA source, a stricken Clinton appeared to buckle.”
This horrific narrative of how Israel allegedly blackmailed an American president initially surfaced in 1999. In his book Gideon’s Spies, author Gordon Thomas claimed that the Mossad had collected some 30 hours’ worth of phone sex conversations between Lewinsky and Clinton and was using them to blackmail the US or to protect a deeply-embedded mole in the White House.
The Clintons have often been referred to in relation to the Epstein affair. It is likely, that as with the young women Epstein abused, the Clintons and other prominent Americans were also ‘victims’ so to say.
I now believe that Epstein was just a player in a huge crime syndicate that often seems to operate in large parts of American life, its politics, culture, academia and, of course, finance. In such a vile apparatus Epstein ran an amusement park. He was never ‘a financier.’ He specialized in accumulating filth that could be used to extract dollars or other favours. In America in 2019 just about every politician at any level except probably Ilhan Omar and Rashida Talib has been reduced into a Zionist puppet. Every prominent American is subject to direct or indirect Zionist pressure of one kind or another.
Igor Ogorodnev wrote yesterday on Russia Today that, “the media has wilfully misinterpreted Donald Trump’s words to portray the most pro-Israel US president in history as an anti-Semite. It makes more sense to chide him for sacrificing US interests to please Benjamin Netanyahu.” Here is my practical advice for Americans. Instead of accusing Trump of being an ‘anti-Semite,’ ask instead why your president is more loyal to Israel than most Israelis, let alone Jews.
To follow the path that led to Jeffrey Epstein’s plea deal listen to this spectacular Jake Morphonios’s podcast

RSS








