The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGilad Atzmon Archive
It Is Not About Trump or Biden
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

It is about Urban vs. Rural

It is about Globalist vs. Nationalist

It is about Cosmopolitans vs. Patriots

It is about Tribal vs. Universal

It is not about Democrats or Republicans

It is about Identitarians vs. Americans

It is about the ‘as a’ people vs. Authenticity

It is about a ‘Great Reset’ vs. longing for greatness

It is about Jerusalem vs. Athens

It is really about the ‘last days of the Weimar Republic’ all over again.

Throughout its history, capitalism has been using different tactics to suppress opposition.

At one stage it was the fantasy of an inevitable revolution. It is indeed the threat of that rebellious spirit which contributed to the evolvement of the welfare state, yet the promised revolution never materialized.

It doesn’t take a genius to gather that in historical perspective, those senses of freedom, productivity and hope which became Western emblems during the post-World War II era, had very little to do with our humanist desires and whims. Our ‘freedom’ was manufactured to titillate the poor human fellows behind the Iron Wall. The Cold War which threatened to wipe out civilization was just the means towards capitalist growth. Accordingly, it would be right to argue that we owe our post-war sense of ‘freedom’ to the USSR and Stalin. The more oppressive communism was, the more liberal the West pretended to be. Once the Soviet bloc evaporated, there was no need to sustain our ‘freedom.’ There was no one to ‘titillate’ with Coca Cola and McDonalds. A new Battle Zone was required to divert the masses’ attention from their true eternal oppressors.

Once again it was the so-called ‘Left’ that provided the goods. Instead of the old Left mantra that called to unite us into a proletarian angry fist regardless of our race, skin color, gender or ethnicity, the ‘New Left’ introduced a completely new hymn. Against the most basic Left universal ethos, the New Left taught us to think and speak ‘as a’: ‘as women,’ ‘as a gay,’ ‘as trans,’ ‘as a Jew,’ ‘as a Latino,’ ‘as a Black.’ We practically learned to fight each other instead of uniting into one people. Instead of eliminating differences, we built new ghetto walls emphasizing and celebrating every possible dividing line (White/Black, male/female, heterosexual/LGBTQ etc.). Instead of identifying Wall Street, MSM propaganda and the technology giants as our fierce global enemy, these actually became the catalysts and cash suppliers in a war we, the people, foolishly declared upon ourselves.

In this new ‘Left’ Identitarian amalgam, every ‘as a’ voice is welcome except the White one. Is it because anyone really believes that ‘White people’ are categorically or collectively bad? I doubt it. It is simply because the so-called ‘White’ was picked to play the ‘role’ of the Soviet bloc. The ‘White’ has become the new imaginary ‘evil.’


As things stand no one in America can unite the nation: neither Biden nor the DNC can introduce a harmonious solution as the above are actually extensions of the problem. Biden and the DNC are inherently tied to Wall Street, Soros, the MSM and technology giants that formulated and sustain this tragic battle. Trump and the GOP of course, cannot do much either, because in the eyes of his many opponents Trump himself is the core of this entire disaster. He is clearly ‘too white’ on top of being a ‘man’ and if this is not enough, he is also an abrasive narcissist.

What we see in America is practically the Weimar Republic all over again.

The public is losing its trust in the democratic process and democratic institutions. Poverty and public unrest is spiking. The national press and media are becoming more and more detached from larger segments of the population. Amidst all of this, Wall Street is booming. The two sides of this divide cannot tolerate each other. They are removed demographically, spiritually, culturally and intellectually. Democracy is becoming a nostalgic notion in the USA and this shouldn’t take us by a big surprise as democracy and freedom are not and never have been prime capitalist goals or values. Democracy and liberty were the means, not the goal. They were there to serve mammonism.* But not anymore; back in November 2016 Wall Street gathered that democracy is in the way. The City of London came to the same conclusion after the Brexit referendum.

If America wants to save itself, it may have to grasp its conditions first. It better transcend itself beyond the fake battle between Trump and Biden or between the Democrats and the GOP. America should figure out who is pushing it into the abyss of civil war. America should figure out who works so hard and successfully, so far, to split it and every other Western country in the middle.

If Orwell’s 1984 carries any prophetic merit, it is easy to figure out who is taking care of the Big Brother’s role. What you may want to do next is figure out who is/what is the current Immanuel Goldstein? Who controls the opposition?

* Mammonism the obsessive pursuit of material wealth and possessions.

(Republished from Gilad Atzmon by permission of author or representative)
Hide 68 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Chris Moore says: • Website

    I think as a master theory, history can be best understood through the Hegelian dialectic: Thesis + Antithesis = Synthesis. For example, Communism + Capitalism = Socialism.

    But nationalism is the minor theory that inevitably “distorts” the master theory, for example, the way the Jewish nation (all Jews acting collectively) has distorted the course of history. Or Germans. Or Russians. Or British. Or Greeks. Or Americans.

    But the Jewish nation has been able to get away with posing as Germans, Russians, British, Greeks, Americans, etc, when in fact it was operating for its own interests. This nationalism within nationalism has further distorted the course of history.

    It will be interesting to see if the Jewish nation’s increasing inability to get away with operating within other nations “smooths out” history, or if, feeling itself backed into a corner and entitled to end history, it goes with some kind of epic Samson option in the same way that Jews and their dependents have thrown a massive tantrum against the rise of America First, with non-authentic America Firster Trump as the focus of their rage, but really the implicit concept of America First (as opposed the the Jews’ Israel First) being the target.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    , @karel
  2. It’s about JEWS v. MANKIND.

    It’s about (((JEWS + SATAN))) v. Christians + Christ.

    The above is the signal. All else is noise.

  3. @Chris Moore

    For example, Communism + Capitalism = Socialism.

    Not so. Communism developed after the socialist movement was well established. Marx was the prime promoter of communism. Many of the communist ideas were standard fare for socialists, but under Marx became twisted into an all powerful state to enforce its goals. Capitalists require an all powerful state to enforce its goals. Capitalism and communism are two sides of the same shekel. Socialism opposes all powerful states as well all powerful corporations, and focuses on the common weal. Most of the 19th century socialist leaders were Auntie Shem-ites.

  4. I’ve often wondered why the Soviet Bloc “fell apart” since money can be created out of nothing and the same people who ruled the Bloc also owned and ruled the western bloc. I also thought when the Soviet Bloc fell apart it might mean the US might begin to crumble due to greed, arrogance and ignorance. Without fear of a capable enemy there was no enemy to which the people had to fear. But I don’t believe the Soviet Bloc was ever flooded with many millions of foreign immigrants by these rulers as the west has been forced to take in. So roughly 30 years after the Bloc died look which country is divided so badly it cannot stand for long and the same people are behind it all. And whether it’s the Left or the Right it’s all the same party since they are both under the control of the same powers.

    • Replies: @Three of Swords
  5. When I read ‘1984’ thirty years ago, I barely understood Goldstein. A Jew? Enigmatic hero, villain, controlled opposition? Eric Blair was a policeman in Burma and enforcer for Judeo-Anglo Empire. Since then that empire has spread worldwide and financialized, technocracized, which allows it to control everyone and everything since it creates the currency and credit at will. Look at the electronically-swindled American election and global media suppression of truth. Eric Blair aka George warned us, aka…….(understand what I am trying to tell you in code)…aka……Or Well…………you are going to suffer a similar fate, mankind. So here we are. Is anybody awake?

  6. @Curmudgeon

    Keep in mind that Karl Marx was a child of wealth and prestige, an aristocrat. Any concern for anyone beneath his position is false.

    Marx married into the Rothschild family. Marx was therefore an acceptable suitor to the Rothschild clan.

    Marx developed Communism to deflect the righteous anger of the lower classes away from the aristocracy, anger that was building in the mid 1800’s.

    Marx pits the Proletariat against the Bourgeois, leaving the Aristocracy completely out of the mix. Divide and Dissipate.

    • Replies: @Adrian
    , @Tsigantes
  7. actually, with the Judeo-communist collapse, the Jews

    chose a different path to liquidating Western Civilization:

    exterminate the Whites. And so far, as demonstrated by the success

    of the Trump con-job, the Whites

    don’t seem to mind.

  8. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:

    As you suggest, for each of those divide et impera fake dichotomies there is a third alternative. A v. B v. No Fuck You. C v. D v. No Fuck you. &c. &c.

    The No Fuck You option is internationalism.

    Internationalism removes the contradiction between globalist and nationalist, cosmopolitan and patriot with national self-determination subject to all your rights. It removes the contradiction between tribal and universal with cultural rights and non-discrimination. It dissolves the contradiction between Jerusalem and Athens by transcending them both and consigning them to the days of yore. In fact nobody’s stuck in Jerusalem or Athens but the US and its most cringing satellites. The world has moved on.

    This is what you’re going to wind up with when your kleptocracy and police state collapse, so you better bone up on it. Because your primitive atavistic throwback state is one tiny shard of the world, 4% of the humans. When the American peoples are ready to rejoin the world, they will have to accept its acquis. That’s how it works when states go off the rails.

    The opposition is no phony Goldstein, the opposition is the outside world. When Americans learn to go over the head of their government to the world, the USA is over.

    • Agree: nosquat loquat
    • Thanks: gay troll
    • Replies: @TheTrumanShow
  9. Chris Moore says: • Website

    I’m saying the Hegelian dialectic is a useful tool to understand the unfolding of history.

    Here’s another Hegelian exercise: Judaism + Christianity = Judeo-Christianity. Some say the two are irreconcilable, but others say that they’ve merged. I would lean toward the latter.

    On the question of Capitalism + Communism = Socialism, I would agree that the Jewish nation distorted Communism, just as it has distorted Capitalism.

    We’ll never know what communism or capitalism free of the Jews would look like, or will we?

    The existence of the Jewish nation allows all of “the Jews” to eventually be identified, and chased out.

    Or maybe Judeo-Christianity will merge with Islam before that can happen. Then we’ll have a whole new set of problems.

    This superstitious “chosen” or entitlement conceit and the “ordained right” to exercise tyranny is absolutely hardwired into so many primitive minds. They all seem absolutely convinced that the stars are on their side. And these Jewish-infected “liberals” and neocons are among the worst of a bad lot.

    It’s simply amazing the rational white man has been able to keep a lid on it for as long as he has, given how much influence the Jews and their sick and superstitious lickspittle now exercise.

  10. nickels says:

    The Weimar republic produced great things.

    • Replies: @ariadna
    , @karel
  11. It’s really about Jews vs the World. Granted, not all Jews are neo-satanist and crazy. Not all are powerful. There have been righteous Jews who tried to speak the truth or some portion of it. Stephen Cohen, Norman Finkelstein, Brother Nathanael, and etc. But they don’t have the power. Finkelstein couldn’t even keep his gig at the second-rate university DePaul because of JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power spearheaded by the odious Alan Dershowitz.

    Now, there would be problems in the world without Jews. Even if all Jews vanished into the thin air, there would be conflicts everywhere. Consider the recent conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis. There are drug wars in Mexico. There are tensions between China and Vietnam. India and Pakistan hate one another. Still, Jewish Power makes it far worse by interfering in hot spots in the world. Instead of letting the locals come to terms a regional power playing broker, Jewish Power often intervenes by using its control of the US as the lone superpower. Would Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Iraq, and Afghanistan be in the states they are in if not for Jewish Power? Would there be a ‘new cold war’ with Russia?
    Without Jewish interference, there would have been no coup in Ukraine and all the bloodbath that followed. Syria would be in one piece. Now, Assad is hardly an ideal leader, but what sane person would prefer Al-qaeda or ISIS? It seems Jews prefer ANYONE(even quasi-nazis in Ukraine) if it’s GOOD FOR JEWS. That’s about the extent of Jewish moral consciousness.
    Just about ANY nation has internal divisions. They could be ethnic, religious, ideological, or whatever. There are some aggrieved factions or minorities in any society. Usually, they just go along because doing so is the best bet. It keeps the peace. But when the order becomes destabilized and these groups are supplied with arms & materials, a war can break out. Same is true of Israel. Suppose foreign powers undermined government power there and supplied arms to Palestinians in both Israel proper and West Bank. Things would go up in flames in street-to-street fighting, like in Syria. Such a Yinon-ist divide-and-rule strategy has been concocted by Jews for goy nations. So, Syria is on fire and Yemen too. Why? Jews don’t want those nations to be stable, secure, and close to Iran. So, ANYTHING is justified in undermining them. So, a limited conflict within Syria blew up into a major war. Thanks Jews.

    But then, a low-level Yinonist Plan has been devised for the West as well. Why do Jews push for mass-immigration and Diversity on goy nations(while never for Israel)? Because Jews know that more Goy Diversity means they can play divide-and-rule game more effectively. But even in relatively homogeneous nations, Jews create and play on ideological and idolatrous divisions to tear them apart. Take Poland. Jews are masters of psychology and understand the Polish Mentality. Poles suffer from the Polish Disease of Slavic Inferiority Complex. Poles don’t want to be associated with Oriental Despotic Russians who seem so crude and backward. They want to be considered as part of Western Europe. They never tire of bleating on about how they are CATHOLIC than Orthodox and how they use the Latin Alphabet than Cyrillic. Poles were once powerful but came to ruins and weakness. They got swallowed up by Russia and came to idolize the West. So, they are a bunch of suckass dogs who crave approval from the West. Jews studied the ‘Dumb Polack’ psychology and know what to do, which is why so many young Poles are into globo-homo and Afromania. (As Catholicism has been replaced by Gay Rites and Jungle Fever in the West, young Poles are dropping Catholicism and raising the new banner of BLM with ‘rainbow’ colors. They go with whatever is ‘cool’ in the West.) Their modus operandi is essentially ‘West is cool and awesome, and Polish value depends on how much the West approves of us.’ Now, this wouldn’t have been so bad in the past when, indeed, the West was far more advanced than the East. Western Enlightenment over Russian Oriental Despotism. Also, there was a time when the West was more race-ist than the East. Russia, with its polygot empire, became somewhat mongrelized. In contrast, Western Europeans, especially of Central and Northern Europe, were more homogeneously white and proud to it.

    But what is the current West? It’s about total cuckdom to Jews, Negroes, and Homos. It’s about Erasism, or erasure of the native population. It’s about the Great Replacement or White Nakba. If anything, current Russia is whiter than many parts of Germany, France, Sweden, Holland, and UK(which should stand for United Kolony than United Kingdom). But the Polish Disease is blind to all that. It only cares about seeking approval from the West that still hogs the global prestige. Due to the Polish Disease, Poles have no autonomous or independent way of gauging meaning and worth. All that matters is sucking up to the Prestigious West.
    One may wonder why the West has prestige when its popular culture is garbage, its borders are broken, its elites are cucky-useless, and its cultural expression is ‘twerking’? One reason is the power of hype. West controls the media machine and advertising. It creates the glitter in your eyes. But it’s also because the nationalist, Christian, and/or conservative forces are so dull, boring, or corrupt. It’s great to be nationalist and it’s good to be Christian but one doesn’t live on seriousness, morality, or eternity alone. People need sensory stimulation, especially in our modern era of electronica. It’s like people love the celebration of Christmas more than its true meaning. It’s the celebration of it that spread to Japan as well, a nation where only 1% is Christian. Consider the Beach Boys song, “Fun, Fun, Fun”. Too often, people feel that the Right takes the T-Bird away. Of course, the Left took it away too under communism, which is why capitalism won the ‘culture war’ against communism. Capitalism offered rides on the T-Bird. Especially as Pop Culture prizes youth uber alles, shallowness has come to dominate social attitudes. And too often(and understandably), ‘growing up’ is seen as synonymous with losing one’s idealism and coming to terms with the corrupt ways of the world. Too many ‘grown-ups’ are compromised professionals. Consider all those ‘experts’ in government. Would it be possible to create a culture where to be grown-up means to be more truthful and principled? To be wise than to compromise?

    But it isn’t easy to root out corruption since anyone who tries will have to go up against the whole system that put him into place. It’s far worse when society is corrupt in general. Then, even as people gripe about corruption, they resist efforts to reform society because they themselves are so used to benefiting from it, which are the cases in Southern Italy and Greece. Southern Italians and Greeks complain endlessly about corruption but resist all attempts to end as it’s how most of them do business. It’s like blacks complain about crime and violence but resist attempts to root them out as they don’t like white police sticking its nose into black affairs.
    Poland is also very corrupt from top to bottom. Perhaps, Poles associate corruption with the Eastern Way and look to the West for a cleaner model. But while the workings of the bureaucracy may be cleaner(at least in Northern European nations), the West is also deeply corrupt and compromised at the very top because it lacks national autonomy. EU nations are all vassals of the US that is controlled by Jews. You can’t have a sound national policy when your leaders are essentially led by the nose by the likes of George Soros. The fact that cleaner government is no panacea to current problems can be seen in UK, Germany, and Sweden. They have cleaner governments than Italy, Greece, and Poland, but that didn’t stop them from embarking on national suicide. If anything, perhaps cleaner government paved the way for the demise. Clean government means law and order, and law and order can lead to prosperity. Order and Wealth leads to boredom and neurosis(like with the characters in Ingmar Bergman films). Also, prosperity means a more generous and naive outlook about the world, such as ‘Save Africa’. Also, extended peace robs people of the warrior spirit that can sense danger. (Of course, Jewish-guided PC informs white people that their survival instincts are ‘atavistic’, ‘backward’, ‘extreme’, and ‘far right’ even as Jews stress upon survival instinct in Israel. According to Jews, any white will to survive as an identity is a ‘pathology’.) Boredom, naivete, and good-will have spelled doom for Sweden. One silver lining about less clean orders is people tend to be less trusting and more survival-minded than good-will-minded. Now, a trust-culture is better than a distrust-culture but ONLY IF the elites are worthy of trust. If the elites are worthless cucks whose agenda will lead to national demise, a trust-culture is the worst possible thing for that society. The people will trust the elites and go over the cliff like so many lemmings.

    Anyway, it’s about Jewish Power that is messing up so much of the world, not least because Jewish intervention blows up local conflicts into global ones. Syrian War would have ended quickly with Assad victorious IF it weren’t for the fact that Jewish-controlled US encouraged Turkey, Saudis, Israel and others to descend on that nation like a pack of vultures. Thus, it turned into a major conflagration.
    While US-Iran relations would be sour due to what happened in 1979, it would be a lot better if not for the Jewish Lobby that insists on Israel remaining the ONLY Middle East nation with nukes. How surreal that Israel with hundreds of nukes gets billions in ‘aid’ while Iran, a nation with no nukes, gets sanctioned savagely. And what’s the beef between US and Russia? Sure, many Americans hate Russia, but why? They rely on the Jewish-controlled Media that say Putin is ‘Putler’ and etc., or Russia is evil because it won’t have homo parades. It’s like dogs barking at something because the master ordered them to. If not for Jewish Power, most Americans would feel no hostility toward Russia. They might not agree with the Russian Way, but no one would get worked up for another ‘cold war’. Anti-Russian policy is totally about Jewish sour-grapes because Putin didn’t allow Jewish oligarchs to do as they pleased. Also, the notion of a white majority nation being proud of its identity/heritage and its religion and saying NO to the NWO(or JWO) is threatening to Jews because it might spread to other white majority nations: No More Sorrows with Soros. Jews pretend that they oppose Russia because it’s against ‘liberal democracy’, but these same Jews have destroyed free speech in the West. They use Antifa terror and thuggery to shut people down. According to Jews, ‘democracy’ is whenever their puppets win. If the people freely elect someone Jews dislike, it’s ‘autocracy’. Jews would have us believe Ukraine is about ‘liberal democracy’ because Jews and their puppets run it.


    Jewish Perfidy goes all around the world. Why does Jewish Power make things so difficult for negotiations with North Korea? Because North Korea has nukes and sets an example for nations hated by Israel. (Never mind N. Korea rushed to get them because Neocon Jews urged Bush II to include that nation in the ‘Axis of Evil’.) Also, why would Jews tolerate a possible reunification of the peninsula and withdrawal of US forces when South Korea is such a useful puppet in the global chess game?
    This Jewish craziness extends all over Latin America. Jewish-run US policy toward Latin America is as follows: Any nation that exhibits any sign of defiance and independently negotiates with Russia, Iran, or etc. must be targeted for regime-change. So, Bolivia came under crossfire. Venezuela has been targeted. All this talk of Venezuela interfering in US elections is rich coming from Americans who’ve been interfering in Latin American affairs forever. But as the Jew Taboo dictates that you can never mention the Jews, you got to blame something other than Jewish Power. If a Jew kicked Alex Jones in the butt, he would blame the Arabs or the ‘Chicoms’.

    While Jews aren’t the sole reason for the world’s problems, they often make things worse by using their proxies, all in the name of ‘good for Jews’. Whether it’s George Soros breaking the Bank of England or Paul Singer financially leeching off other nations, there is the Jewish Hand. And who spread all this hideous neo-satanic globo-homo madness? Jews did. And why did so many whites become completely defenseless against such rot? Because their minds have been molded by the 2 PC’s of political-correctness and pop-culture controlled by Jews. And of course, proxies of Jews spread degeneracy(especially of globo-homo nature) and conflicts all over the world.

    Karl Marx failed, but a kind of Marxism did come to fruition. That of Groucho, Chico, and Harpo. Look all around and world politics is like DUCK SOUP(or Cuck Soup). Wily Jews pull all sorts of tricks and lead the stiff/square white goyim by the nose. The build-up to the Iraq War was like the scene in DUCK SOUP. Jews run circles around goy politicians like Groucho and Chico do with Wasps. Jewish Power is always several moves ahead, and the goyim are often taken by surprise and succumb in bemusement. Of course, as we’re supposed to take it so seriously, current world affairs is like a straight-faced comedy, but what a joke it is. In an earlier time, one might have regarded DUCK SOUP as a satire of warmongers, but it no longer seems that way. It’s more like a funny manual of how Jews can manipulate thick-skulled, square, lame, or dimwit goyim into just about anything. How is the scene in DUCK SOUP any different from what happens in Congress, CIA, or the Pentagon?

    Another revealing figure about the Jewish Way is Jerry(or Jewry) Springer. What was his shtick? He would bring on these disgruntled goyim and make them beat one another up to the audience chant of ‘Jerry, Jerry, Jerry’. Naturally, people have gripes all across America, but Springer exploited it and blew up these squabbles into ‘national’ feuds, a kind of World War Trash. He exploited trivial matters and turned them into big comedy-drama for national TV. And while these hapless and stupid goyim made total fools out of themselves(while also delighting in their 15 min of fame as insta-celebrities), Springer stood apart, safe and aloof, giggling with contempt at the easily duped goyim.
    How is this any different from how Jews play world politics? True, there are deep-seated tensions and problems all around the world. But they are local in nature and remain limited in their implications AS LONG AS some global power doesn’t come between them. The Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict wouldn’t have gotten this bad IF Soros didn’t encourage Armenia to make dumb decisions and if Israel didn’t supply Azerbaijan with weapons. Notice how Jews play both sides, just like Jerry Springer pretended to have a sympathetic ear for all his guests when, in fact, he was doing everything to goad them into violence. On the show, there was Jerry Springer as the grandmaster, a kind of Soros-ian figure. And the big beefy security guys were like the US military. They kept the order. But did they keep the order for order’s sake? No, the order was kept on stage just to make the guests fight like demented gladiators and make total fools of themselves. And what happens to these hapless goyim? Just ask the Armenians… or will anyone learn? Jews mess with the world, but the world pleads with Jews for sympathy as the Tribe has ungodly powers of finance, media, academia, big tech, gambling, deep state, and Shoah Worship(which deems any criticism of Jews as ‘antisemitic’ and ‘nazi’). So, even people like Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump who’ve come under special abuse by Jews (must) go through the ritual of appealing to Jews for ‘advice’ and ‘approval’. It’s like a mafia extortion scheme where one must pay ‘protection money’ and show respect. But protection from whom? From the one providing the ‘protection’, as if you don’t pay, your place will go up in flames.

    In this new ‘Left’ Identitarian amalgam, every ‘as a’ voice is welcome except the White one.

    It’s been said Diversity Craze and PC(or ‘wokeness’) are about Anti-White-ism and celebration of all non-whites, but this isn’t really true. If it were truly anti-white across the board, it would gain little traction with most whites. Why then do so many whites embrace it? Because it’s white-elitist and appeals to the suppressed ‘spiritual’ side of man. A white person who adopts PC feels morally elitist over incorrigibly ‘racist’ whites and socially elitist because most higher institutions are governed by PC codes. Furthermore, man is naturally spiritual even if irreligious. Just like vegans crave meat — mind can be moral but the body isn’t — , modern secular folks, despite their conceit of rationality, crave the sacred and spiritual because emotional balance demands it. Of course, if one needs spirituality, it’s better to go with real religion or mythology, just like it’s better to have meat-protein than the soy kind.
    Religion says God is above all. Now, why is this a problem for Jews? Because if Christianity or Islam is true and if God is above all, then it means all races should bow down before God as the ultimate judge. Under God, Jews and Goyim would equally be judged. Jewish Supremacists don’t want equality with goyim, and so, they pushed for secularization. Now, the secular order can also be for justice for all. If the Law calls for equal justice regardless of race, color, or creed, that means Jews must be treated and judged like anyone else. But, that’s no good for Jewish Supremacist ambition. So, Jews, the masters of psychology, infused the modern secular mind that hungers for spirituality with the quasi-spiritual worship of Jews and their favorite allies.
    So, Diversity isn’t about equal celebration of all non-white groups but special celebration and apotheosis of Jews, along with blacks and homos. If PC or ‘wokeness’ were truly about equal justice for Diversity, then the media would run as many pro-Palestinian and pro-Syrian stories as pro-Jewish stories. Hollywood would have made many TV shows and movies about Nakba and the dark side of Zionism. But, while the media almost never run anti-Zionist stories, they are filled with anti-Syrian, anti-Iranian, and anti-anything-hated-by-Jews stories. When Michael Brown strong-armed an immigrant business owner whose store was later ransacked by black thugs, where was the concern for his kind? None. Blacks matter, they don’t. If Diversity is about celebration of all sexual expressions and deviancy, how come there is no month-long celebration of incest? It’s telling that most non-whites don’t stand up for their own identities and cultures but seek attachment to one of the sacred identities, namely Jewish, black, and homo. How many non-whites would succeed in Wall Street, Hollywood, or Big Tech if they displayed the Palestinian Flag? A Burmese-American showing pride in Burmese identity doesn’t get him very far. An Iranian-American extolling the greatness of Iran wins almost no wokemon points. For approval or success, they are better off waving the homo flag or displaying a BLM sign. In contrast, it’s great for a Jew to say he’s proud to be Jewish. It’s sensational for a homo to say sodomy is ‘pride’. It’s awesome for blacks to pontificate about how ‘black lives matter’ even though blacks are main killers of blacks. So, Diversity is less about the celebration of non-white identities but about most non-white groups circling around the altars of Jewish Identity, Black Identity, and Globo-Homo, the Tri-Supremacism.

    Now, what do whites get from this? While many whites do lose out, it offers quasi-spiritual succor to elite whites and wanna-be-elite whites who, lacking privilege, settle for the next-best thing, which is attitude(of virtue-signaling), as in “I work at Starbucks and live in a crammed apartment, but I listen to NPR and read the New Yorker like all the sOpHiStIcAtEd people”. Oh wow, we are so impressed.
    PC is designed so that not all whites lose out. While it beats many whites with the stick as ‘racist’, it offers ‘spiritual’ and careerist carrots to those who repent and seek redemption. This atonement can be sincere(among the naive & childlike) or cynical(among the craven & opportunistic), but what matters is it either bestows immediate status or justifies the existing privileges of those whites who’ve chosen to be ‘baptized’. In a way, ‘wokeness’ is more exciting for whites than for non-whites. Whereas Jews, blacks, and homos can only feel righteous rage, whites can experience the full drama, the passion play, of sainthood. Or the Road-to-Damascus Moment, though it’s more like ‘dumbass-cuss’. Just like it’s refreshing to take a shower when one’s dirty and sweaty, it feels great to be washed of ‘sin’, which among secular whites is ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and ‘homophobia’. Evangelicals are about being Born-Again, and white secularists are essentially Evanglobalists. They feel born-again, hallelujah.
    Furthermore, the notion of ‘white privilege’ has a perversely empowering effect on whites. After all, if ‘white supremacism’ is built into the System, then it means whites are indeed superior in power, wealth, and everything. That means whites have two options. Be greedy and keep all the goodies for themselves OR share the bounty with the less fortunate and show off their magnanimity. So, privileged whites who buy into ‘white guilt’ regard themselves as the all-powerful group that is being so kind and generous than a declining racial group being bullied and intimidated into acquiescence(even though the latter may be closer to the mark).
    Besides, ‘wokeness’ really aids and abets white privilege. How? If White Power(meaning the shared and united power of all whites) is taboo and must be stamped out, then there can only be privilege for white individuals. The notion of ‘privilege’ NEVER applies to all members of a group. In Old Europe, the privileged were the noblemen, not all white people. So, if white people cannot consolidate power as a group or collective, then the only option is for white individuals to seek privilege for themselves and children.
    When PC speaks of ‘white privilege’, it’s as if ALL whites share in it. But, privilege is inherently exclusive. For example, the white advantage over blacks in Old America was the result of white power. Whites were united then and identified with one another, top to bottom, east to west. Power cuts through privilege, i.e. poor whites without privilege shared in the power of whiteness. Power exists without privilege.
    If power is forbidden, there is only privilege for those who seek it on their own. So, for whites who don’t want the burden of uniting with all whites and leading them as a united folks(as Moses did with the Israelites), PC is just fine because it allows them to work only for their own privilege than for the power of the whole race. After all, privilege is a less daunting task than power. It would have been easier for Moses to keep his privilege in Egypt and live well than give that up to strive for the power of his people as a collective unity.

    Besides, as ‘born-again good whites’, these white cucky-wucks are allowed to feel oh-so-righteous and holy-schmoly, and this is in more ways than one a continuation of Christian Psychology. Elevate oneself by humbling oneself. “Oh, I’m a sinner, I admit it, and I said my ‘Hail Marys’, and that means I’m so much better than those who haven’t, let alone the benighted who aren’t even of the faith.” Humbly bowing before God and Jesus means your kind is holy and has the right to conquer the heathens and destroy the heretics. It’s the Christian Paradox: The lower you kneel, higher you feel. Same with today’s cucky-wuck worshipers of Anne Frank, Barbra Streisand, MLK, Mandela, George Floyd, and Harvey Milk. And this mentality now infects the so-called ‘right’ as well as the ‘left’. Look, Trump has the endorsement of magical rapper Kanye!

    • Agree: Nisbe
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Anon
    , @schrub
    , @Jake
  12. @Priss Factor

    Priss….you should be getting paid for your articles…..

  13. Svevlad says:


    Then soon we’ll get a final, very dangerous “as a”: As a white working class man.

    And then it’s going to be a bloodbath, as it’s basically preemptive self-defense genocide. Nothing of value would be lost really

  14. Verity says:

    Under Marx became twisted into an authoritarian state? Not really! Go read Marx again with a brief detour last Lenin and especially Stalin.

    • Replies: @Donald Duck
  15. @John Q Duped

    I’ve often wondered why the Soviet Bloc “fell apart” since money can be created out of nothing and the same people who ruled the Bloc also owned and ruled the western bloc.

    Not an expert opinion, just a thought.

    When a bunch of us would sit down to cards or a board game and the table would get so messy from snacks, beverages, and the rest that we ourselves couldn’t stand it anymore, we would declare, “New Game”, gather up the tablecloth, throw it out with the everything that was on it (except the game), and start from scratch.

    Maybe the “owners’ didn’t even need this excuse. Maybe they just did it because they could.

  16. @Chris Moore


    The absurdity of the whole thing as applied to history is Marx ignorantly insisting countries went from feudalism to capitalism to socialism to ultimately communism.

    So where has this actually happened? Russia went from a monarchy to communism, notwithstanding it’s extremely short “Republic” in 1917.

    Pol Pot. Mao. Castro. Africa, Latin America, Asia – wherever you look it did not follow Marx’s axiom. So how can it be useful?

    This is one of the incredible thing about Marxists: no matter how wrong they are, every single time Marxism is applied, the same arguments are made again.

  17. While I think what you’re saying has a great deal of value, your identification of yourself as ‘Left’ is becoming increasingly dubious. I think you cling to it — but sooner or later, you’re going to have to admit the whole ideology’s become bankrupt. Nobody can respect these ‘Antifa’ assholes with their empty jargon and Fascist impulses — and that’s all that’s left of ‘the Left.’

  18. @Chris Moore

    …We’ll never know what communism or capitalism free of the Jews would look like, or will we?…’

    Pol Pot’s Cambodia versus Japan? North Korea versus South Korea?

    Were you suggesting further trials? Perhaps on a larger scale?

  19. @backwoods bob

    The modifier there is “by whom?” in terms of the argument. It’s only the Jewish theorists and practitioners who obfuscate. I can go to my University’s Party Officer and ask him if China is a Marxist country. He will assert that it is not only a Marxist country, but that it is the only one to have practiced Marx’s thought effectively.

    He will then point to the GDP, increasing standards of living, and Xinhua televising American riots and state that China’s interpretation of Marx has created a stable and prosperous country — at least in comparison with the Capitalist USA and its supposedly “Marxist” BLM malcontents.

  20. @Curmudgeon

    That looks a bit muddled to me, Bludgeon. You are right on the first point, there were important socialists before Marx. But learn the difference between Marxism and Bolshevism. Ask yourself why Rosa writing from prison in Germany expressed herself heartbroken that Lenin didn’t immediately call elections of the soviets when the revolution was won. Why would a revolutionary Marxist like her feel that way? Grasp that Marx stood for democracy, with the sole limitation that the oligarchy couldn’t vote, only the workers could. A finer democracy than America ever saw, still.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  21. Good truely marxist article. Here is the translation in French:
    We French appreciate a lot Gilad’s fast and accurate thoughts, straight arrows in front of heavy armoured other thinkers, who come after and later in the battle.
    By the way, there is a real opposition that the so called left never uses to divide us, it is youth against seniors; seniors are conservative, by nature, as Gilad already pointed out in his last article. Maybe we should give them more strenght “as elder”, and more wise indeed. Our ennemies try to use us (I am 70) as simple and silly followers of the youngsters, in order to look not so old. There is something completely wrong in this strategy of the left, we should undo that. For example, thinking about racial problems, we could say: how is it possible that the young activists ignore all the conquests in the battle for civil rights; we should recongnize how better things are now, and thank MLK and Nation of Islam, and all those black fighters of the previous generations: they really succeeded to make America better; things may not be perfect still, but, as Gilad points it out in previous articles, nowadays every not so black person adores Black music, black features, black style etc. Until WWI it was the opposite, real fear and disgust, in every White country. So, let Uncle Web Dubois lead our renewed optimism and faith about solidarity. And let us feel proud about him, and claim being his proud nephews.

  22. Adrian says:

    Keep in mind that Karl Marx was a child of wealth and prestige, an aristocrat. Any concern for anyone beneath his position is false.

    Marx married into the Rothschild family. Marx was therefore an acceptable suitor to the Rothschild clan.

    Nonsense – check your “facts”.

    • Agree: Wielgus
    • Replies: @Wielgus
    , @Seraphim
  23. Jake says:

    Gilad Atzmon once again nails the truth to the door.

  24. Wielgus says:

    To enlarge on your point, his father converted from Judaism to Lutheranism, probably not because of religious belief but to escape from the social disabilities to which Jews were subjected (Jewish aristocrats? At the end of the 18th century?). Karl Marx’s wife, Jenny von Westphalen, was a Gentile and from the Rhineland aristocracy. Marrying Marx if anything reduced her social standing.
    Marx was no aristocrat, but even if he had been it would not have ruled out concern for the less well-off.

    • Agree: Angharad
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @ivan
  25. ariadna says:

    as a reaction to it?

    • Agree: nickels
  26. Rahan says:

    The more oppressive communism was, the more liberal the West pretended to be. Once the Soviet bloc evaporated, there was no need to sustain our ‘freedom.’

    Hence the utter hysterics against Russia and China today. They were supposed to fall into line by now, not keep forcing the Western system to continue pretending to be democratic. This wasn’t in the plan! Reeeee!

  27. Anon[358] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    Im a little disappointed with whites , they could have lead a rebellion against the current world order and million of people all across the world would have adhered to the revolution instead they choose race realism ,a racial caste system that not only nullify any oposition dividing us all but secularize the chosenite narrative of the jews .

  28. @Maria Poumier

    The baby boom generation were the most enthusiastic recipients of Western Niggerfication. I hope the youth devour you.

    • Troll: Twodees Partain
  29. schrub says:
    @Priss Factor

    Congratulations Priss.

    You have produced no less than another Priss-ian classic.

  30. anon[193] • Disclaimer says:

    Ultimately, it’s about JWO vs. BRI.

    BRI is the only real rival to the JWO. Jews fear and loath Xi Jin Ping because he is smart and nationalistic, just like Putin, and China is the ten thousand pound gorilla that is awakening. When China combines forces with Russia, Iran and esp. if Germany and Italy join in, they will be unstoppable. All of East Asia is basically now a single block behind China, incl. Japan and Korea. Jews are trying to take Xi down from both the left and right. Notice China-hate is the only thing msm and Breitbart/National Review/Fox News (controlled opposition), Trump and George Soros agree on.

    CIA’s election interfering software Hammer and Scorecard are not just to interfere in elections of countries like Venezuela or Ukraine, I highly suspect they are also used on our supposed allies, for e.g. I suspect CIA stole the election from Marine Le Pen for Rosthschild stooge Macron, and from anti-migrant Salvini in Italy.

    Angela Merkel will retire in 2021. Per WSJ Germany is now split between a a pro-China faction and a pro-US faction, one of which will replace Merkel. Germany has roughly equal amounts of trade with each country, slightly more with US now but trade with China is growing faster. Trump is working on a coalition to take down China on his way out, perhaps as a last ditch suckup to the Zionists so they’d let him keep his money losing casinos.

  31. @Maria Poumier

    ‘…we should recongnize how better things are now, and thank MLK and Nation of Islam, and all those black fighters of the previous generations: they really succeeded to make America better…’

    And they intend to make it better still. That’s the problem.

  32. @Wielgus

    ‘…Marx was no aristocrat, but even if he had been it would not have ruled out concern for the less well-off.’

    How rarely those concerned for the less well-off bother themselves about what the less well-off actually think about it all.

    In fact, if the less well-off do attempt to voice their opinion, they’re usually promptly and firmly silenced. Witness the ‘election’ we just had. The town I live in — which is decidedly ‘less well-off’ — voted 70% for Trump.

    The reaction to that seems to range from contemptuous distain to outraged demands that we be incarcerated.

  33. Ace says:

    To write that “capitalism” has been using different tactics to suppress opposition is to talk of “capitalism” as though it were some odd but historically unique chimera that wandered onto the world stage. Did the world’s rulers in other times not know opposition in their time and take steps to suppress it? Or co-opt with it?

    Where in history do we see any rulers who looked upon opposition with indifference or equanimity? Did opposition flourish in the Soviet Union, I wonder?

    Is it helpful to look upon the present massive exercise in election theft and say that it is “capitalism” that has brought it about? Or is it possible to come up with more a more useful term to identify those seeking to suppress opposition?

    I have no enthusiasm for taking to the streets to oppose “capitalists.” That’s only marginally more precise than taking to the streets to oppose “bad people.”

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  34. ‘Where in history do we see any rulers who looked upon opposition with indifference or equanimity? ‘

    Well, since you ask…

    The Austro-Hungarian Empire, Weimar Germany, and nineteenth-twentieth century Britain all seem to have regarded opposition with relative equanimity.

    • Replies: @Ace
    , @karel
  35. geokat62 says:

    It is about Globalist vs. Nationalist

    Unfortunately, in this day and age, the term “Nationalist” must be qualified…

    It is about Civic-Nationalist vs. Ethno-Nationalist

    While most of the world supports ethno-nationalism for non-whites, they deem it to be racist for whites to aspire to the same principle.

    Where do you stand, Gilad?

    Do subscribe to the mantra developed by Jewish Supremacist Organizations, immediately following WWII?:

    Never Again! means saying goodbye to “blood and soil” and hello to “multiculti”

  36. ivan says:

    Marx’s father may have had many compulsions to become a Christian. But from his extant letters to his son, he was a sincere Christian who wished mainly for his son to be a faithful Lutheran Christian.

  37. ivan says:
    @backwoods bob

    Karl Marx was a great student of economics. He wrote at a time when the European empires were going from triumph to triumph. But as a historian he had a sense that things would not last. The other nationalities that took their lessons from Marx, say the Chinese Communists, were in the main interested in modernising their countries as speedily as possible. Marx’s account of capitalistic development, provided the guide for such people. The Chinese have their own version of capitalism thanks in a significant part to their study of Marx. In India, the Communists were not as interested in industrial development as the Chinese, but they used his outline of historical development to push for necessary reforms of the stifling mores, and the control of land resources by the rich. Marx would have disowned fellows such as Pol Pot. Pol Pot owed more to the Jacobin tendencies of the French Revolution than to Marx. And Marx didn’t have a high opinion of the abilities of non-Europeans.

    Its very silly of Americans to blame everything on so-called “Marxists”, when Marx would have disowned most of them.

    • Replies: @Tsigantes
  38. Ace says:
    @Colin Wright

    That’s a bit vague. Tell me what specific opposition or subversion those three nations faced and then let’s see how relaxed they were about it.

    Weimar was anything but relaxed about communists:

    [The Freikorps] were the key Weimar paramilitary groups active during that time. . . . They received considerable support from Minister of Defence Gustav Noske, a member of the Social Democratic Party of Germany. Noske used them to suppress the German Revolution of 1918–19 and the Marxist Spartacist League, including arresting and executing leaders Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg on 15 January 1919. They were used to defeat the Bavarian Soviet Republic in May 1919.


    The Austro-Hungarian Empire had its hands full with minority agitation but its officials seemed to have forestalled (co-opted) more serious opposition by effective political compromises with it various minorities:

    By playing nationalities off one another, the government ensured the monarchy’s central role in holding together competing interest groups in an era of rapid change.


    Twentieth-century Britain did not take kindly to Oswald Mosley.


    [In 1972] British troops opened fire on a crowd of civil rights protestors in Londonderry, Northern Ireland, killing 13 civilians and injuring a further 17. The crowd of between 7,000 and 10,000 people had been marching in protest at the policy of detention without trial. The sequence of events on ‘Bloody Sunday’ remains highly controversial, with accusations that senior IRA figures were present on the day and shot at British troops.

    Britain:1945 to Present.

    I don’t know when Britain changed from being phlegmatic about opposition in the 20th-c. but by this century it proved to be quite enthusiastic about vicious attacks on dissidents, in one case setting up Tommy Robinson to have boiling water thrown in his face in prison.

    In the 19th century, the crown dealt with The Fenian Uprising with treason charges and executions. Link.

    Does that seem particularly relaxed to you?

    That’s just a bit of random cherry picking. As I say, perhaps you can supply some specific examples of official indifference.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  39. @Ace

    ‘Does that seem particularly relaxed to you?’

    Compared to the norm, yes.

    • Replies: @Ace
  40. @backwoods bob

    Communism evloves from Capitalism –tts complete failure –read it again.

  41. Tsigantes says:

    Wealth and prestige [status, celebrity] does not make you an aristocrat.
    Just saying.

  42. Ace says:
    @Colin Wright

    The norm. I wonder what your idea of the norm is. Maybe the Indian Mutiny?

  43. Tsigantes says:

    Give backwoods a break. Americans have not been exposed throughout their lives to inter-communist nitpicking, cancelation and death struggles over purity. They cannot spot marxist revisionism. They don’t understand the difference between Stalin and Trotsky. For them it’s no warning signal, or red flag, that their neoliberals were [are] Trotskyists. They can’t see that identity politics is pure Trotsky / Gramsci….they’ve never heard of Gramsci and God bless them for that.

    But it does mean No Immunities!

    • Replies: @Ivan
  44. Tsigantes says:

    Never a truer word Gilad! Thanks as ever!

  45. Jake says:
    @Priss Factor

    The “Jewish craziness’ is about one thing: being anti-Christ and anti-Christendom.

    Because the Jews were the people to whom the coming Messias was entrusted, Jewish rejection of The Christ is not like rejection of Christ by any other people. It is a Tribal/ethnos rejection. It is a rejection bound up in all of the body and soul, for all time, and with a searing desire to destroy, to utterly defame and eradicate, the fruit of the thing rejected. That Jewish rejection means that Jews as a group, the Jewish Race or Ethnos or Tribe, is allied with Satan, is the only racial/ethnic/tribal group to be the human version of the Rebellious angels who joined Satan. Jewish individuals who never ascribe, who even work against, that active rebellion do not render it invalid for the Tribe/ethnos as a whole.

    What that means most importantly is that the only thing that can ever contain Jewish animosity to Christ and Christendom, and the peoples of historic Christendom (whites), which necessarily spills over into a Jewish desire to force the entire world to bow to Jewish overlordship, is a rebuilt and healthy Christendom. Everything else is at best a waste of time and energy.

    Jews know that, which is the reason Jews were so central to early Reformation publishing, often for very little profit. Likewise, Jewish financiers immediately were happy to lend t0 Protestant princes and generals. The Reformation, erected significantly upon a series of Judaizing ideas, each of which would have its own inevitable development of false doctrine, split Christendom and then led to its slow death.

    Another thing that history means is that 1 European linguistic/cultural/ethnic group stands out as having drawn Jews and facilitated Jewish mischief and malfeasance: Germanic.

    Jews almost certainly began attaching themselves to Germanic culture as they saw Germanics destroy the Western Roman Empire. If those northern barbarians could do that, then surely their culture was ripe for serving the larger Jewish desire of destroying any possibility of Christendom.

    The first international Jewish language, Yiddish, is German, with a sprinkling of Hebraisms. Every single Jew from the Russian Empire who engaged in any revolutionary activity, even peaceful ones, came from a Yiddish speaking background that in broad cultural terms was pro-Germanic. The current language of international Jewry, English, is also Germanic. Those are not accidents. Nor is it an accident that the British Empire was the one and only entity to spread philo-Semitic thought and activity around the globe.

    Luther was a Saxon, and Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy that determined the formation and basis of Modern English culture. WASP Empire always has been, and always will be, philo-Semitic, will be Anglo-Zionist Empire. That ought to be manifest as archetypal WASP Oliver Cromwell allied with Jewish financiers, meaning that from the inception of the English Empire, the WASP Empire, Jewish bankers have been essential. It always has been a partnership: WASP Elites and Jews, specifically Jewish financiers. That was true in 1655 and 1790 and at Queen Victoria’s coronation, just as it is true today.

    WASP Empire is Anglo-Zionist Empire and therefore is anti-Christendom Empire. And the only way to contain the Jewish Problem is with a revived and healthy Christendom.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  46. Ivan says:

    It’s of a piece with the obtuse way they jump on the “liberals”. A liberal in the rest of the world means a person who believe that the government is but a necessary evil. Someone who prizes liberty above all else. What in the US terms would be someone such as Senator Ron Paul.

  47. @anon

    “The world has moved on… ”

    Nonsense. The “world” has absolutely NOT moved on, beyond that which it can beg/borrow/buy-on-usurious credit from “… the one tiny shard of the world, 4% of the humans.”

    Sorry, but that’s the way life has alway been and always will be. Every step down from that upper N-% is a step down into the 3rd/4th/5th/n-1 th world of garbage and dog shit everywhere, and sub-90 IQ incompetence as the pinnacle of the pyramid.

    The whole lot of “UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS” is nothing more than lawfare eye candy for the gullible. The very notion of a legal leveling to equality is an oxymoronic feint of a pickpocketer.

    Where now, when most needed, are these “Rights” of which you speak?

  48. karel says:
    @Chris Moore

    Very clever this Kerlchen Hegel. The equation you proposed makes a lot of sense and even more so if you try to rearrange it. Hence, assuming that
    ”Communism + Capitalism = Socialism”
    Communism = Socialism – Capitalism
    Capitalism = Socialism – Communism

    In the fifties I was taught at school that
    soviet government + electrification of the entire country = communism
    This slogan was supposedly invented by Lenin but I am no longer so certain.
    We all wondered whether
    electrification = communism – soviet government
    but nobody dared to ask the teacher whether this may also hold.

  49. karel says:

    Yes, inflation was really great.

    • Replies: @PolarBear
  50. karel says:
    @Colin Wright

    Jawohl, Herr Colin. How very true everything what you write. Apart from few sad and rather regrettable events, like the bombardment of the Old Town from Letná cf.
    one must inevitably conclude that the degenerate Habsburgs were rather peace loving.

    • Agree: Ace
  51. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Marx was a statist. His opponents were opposed to states. Proudhon, “the father of anarchy” called Marx the tapeworm in socialism. Bakunin saw Marx and his centrism akin to a Rothschild bank. The mainstream socialist view, before Marx was co-operative like structures – decentralized. Marx thought he could force that and knew damn well his centralization would lead to people like Lenin.
    As for a “finer democracy than America ever saw, still”, I have no disagreement with that. Most Americans, because “republic”, don’t have a clue about democracy.

  52. anon[149] • Disclaimer says:

    So! Who does control the opposition? How is it organized? Who are the members? Is it really just controlled opposition?

    An opposition that is well organized and ruthless is needed to oppose the current masters of the state, people and information less we face a long spell of dystopian nightmare. It would be nice if it were democratic but one cannot have everything one wishes.

    Right now Trump should be viewed as our son of a bitch whatever he really is. Pushing back against an imminent Biden victory is the current imperative. After securing Trump’s reelection the status of the electoral system can be reviewed and modified, hopefully.

    We must, however, consider other possibilities. Democracy is a gentlemen’s game requiring the exercise of a certain restraint. We demonstrate constantly these days that we are no longer gentlemen if we ever were.

    The real issue is not Trump or Biden but state policy. There are some policies that cannot be tolerated even if oceans of blood must be spilled to prevent them and for which democratic approbation is no defense. If democracy were all that is important there would be no need for a set of basic standards of conduct such as the Constitution and the Bill of Rights represent.

    The Left and the Democratic Party are asserting that democracy is the sole touchstone of political choice. That makes them the most dangerous and destructive of political forces on Earth. Democracy cannot be a touchstone for it is formless, contentless, and thoroughly amoral. Vox Populi, Vox Dei is one of the truly great monsters to afflict mankind because it is protean. Catastrophe may come in a moment from foolish decisions. Decisions demonstrated foolish by historical consequences.

    As champions of unrestrained democracy the Left and the Democratic Party are the champions of chaos. The champions of all that is good and beautiful and all that is evil and cruel beyond any assurance of rational selection. They open the door to tyranny for there is no restraint on the most determined who would seize power in the name of anything. They are champions of the monster. This proposition needs to be thoroughly grasped and accepted whatever it means for the future of democracy. We cannot hitch our wagon to a star whose promise is an illusion.

    If Trump becomes President again whether he is viewed as selected or elected, legitimate or illegitimate the Left, the Democratic Party and its associated media need to be strongly disciplined by whatever means necessary. This will require strong leadership willing to act. Something we may not get, but we can hope.

  53. @Jake

    What USA is experiencing today is a near-equivalent to zionists kicking the British out of Mandate Palestine.

    When the Second World War finally came to an end, the British found themselves confronted by a challenge from the Yishuv, the small Zionist settlement in Palestine. This challenge, tacitly supported by the United States, was to compromise the British Empire’s overall position in the Middle East and thereby begin the process of its dissolution in the region. This failure to overcome the Zionist challenge is one of the most humiliating episodes in immediate post-war British history. How was it that the Yishuv was able to inflict such a defeat on a British military establishment **fresh from its victories over Germany and Japan?**


    Zionist Terrorism and Imperial Response
    British Policies towards Jewish Resistance in Palestine 1944-1948, by Robert Lackner
    Great Britain as the mandatory power restricted Jewish immigration in order to appease the neighbouring Arab countries.
    As a consequence, the Zionist terror organisations Irgun and Lehi declared war on the British in early 1944, killing or wounding hundreds of soldiers, policemen and colonial officials.
    Until its very last days in Palestine, the Empire found no appropriate policy either to break up the underground or at least to stop the attacks on military and civilian targets.
    This book describes the guerrilla tactics adopted by the Jewish terrorists and examines the failure of Britain’s political and military strategy, highlighting the reasons for her inability to stop terrorism.

  54. I still contend that all the smoke being generated from current social and financial mayhem, can be crystallized by simply visualizing three bellowing and stinky stove pipes. The first being Artificial Intelligence or AI, robotics (manufacturing) and lastly, new energy sources. Quite certain that I read a figure of 300,000 robotics engineers must be generated soon and pumped into the western Occident “working class”. That is to say, whatever remains, within the bounds and definition of a traditional upper middle class, skilled labor category. AI now possesses the capability to generate it’s own software and computer language(s) thus will be unknown to the original human programmers. How to unplug AI should the necessity arise? you may very well ask and this AI community can easily turn on humanity by launching A-bombs that our military deemed necessary to unite together. Warmongers relinquishing any further responsibility? perhaps history will end at the very outset of some minor infraction to the balance of power? This delegation of ultimate responsibility done so as to maintain a prompt response to real or perceived threats by the opposing side and it’s AI weapons systems. Finally there’s the direct threat to the petrochemical extraction and distribution architecture originally built onto the “Seven Sisters Platform” in the middle east i.e., Rockefeller/City of London banks. Commercial fusion power for example will take the wealth and power out of the hands of those deeply vested in an ongoing blood for oil conspiracy, turmoil for oil and total domination of individuals and sovereign entities who never learned how to possess, control, protect and distribute oil. The Oil-oligarchy will need to step down a few notches and at the same time, will be plagued by revenge of every sort issued from those remaining (smaller) hoodlums, scoundrels, the human, weapons and dope trafficking cabals as well as the bitterly subjugated who now lie in wait for them (terrorists? LOL). For example, the avengers cometh (as in the iceman), those anti-industrialists, population control advocates, energy conservation strategists I have loosely bundled together, as the Conservation NeoNazis. Their investments and efforts now lost to truly clean energy, ascendant anti-globalism, perhaps coupled with other miracles like electrical superconductivity will benefit one and all without the ONE government ONE big brother approach.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  55. Quite interesting that all this stuff is taking place about now. Years ago, watching with keen interest, myself and a co-worker, watching The Wall come down.

    “Never thought I’d live to see this.” I said. “The end of the USSR. Whoa!”

    Older, perhaps wiser, my comrade? Almost under his breath? “You do know our turn’s not far off now.”

    I was speechless.

  56. anonymous[212] • Disclaimer says:

    simply visualizing three bellowing and stinky stove pipes.

    — and six or so stinking paragraphs

  57. Vojkan says:

    The Right suffers from myopia, the Left from hyperopia. Both need optical correction but both are in denial of their impairments.

  58. geo says:

    Marxism = Judaic project.
    Democracy = modern devide created by the Class struggle
    Socialism/Communism = Political Marxism
    Modern Capitalism = Economical Marxism
    Liberalism/Progressivism/Democrat-ism = Cultural Marxism = induced schizophrenia in those living in a second world, of imaginary construct and DENYING the physical reality.
    Green-ism/Ecologism = neo-Paganism (idolatry and Neo-Shamanism) stuffed with Hinduism (in Philosophy, Medicine, Physics, Life and Mind description, …. Cosmogony.)
    Atheism = mental disease: one cannot be against something this one does not know.
    No real Social-Democracy due to antagonizing the classes.
    No real Christian-Democracy due to the antagonizing of classes where is no possible to “love your neighbour”.
    All of them: anti-Christian.

  59. Seraphim says:

    The truth is that Karl Heinrich Marx was the one related to the Rothschilds. Third cousin of Nathaniel Mayer Rothschild, 1st Baron Rothschild.

  60. Grow up, Gilad. Your not of the left. The NRx neo reactionary community welcomes you. Have a look at Biological Leninism. Ethno Nationalism for all peoples of the world protected by all peoples. Nationalism means that you love all nations of the world but love your nation the most. It’s the key to world peace. Big Jews give little Jews, like yourself, a bad name. The dark is getting darker because the light is getting brighter. Rise and shine for the sake of your people and all people’s of the world. With God’s grace, together, we can isolate the warmongers, secret societies and criminal’s within all nations. We’ll do it. You’ll see. Thanks for the music.

    • Replies: @Brad Anbro
  61. @Michael McCarthy

    Mr. McCarthy, I think that the point that this column was trying to put across is that there is NO LONGER any “right” vs. “left” (or Republican vs. Democrat, for that matter). BOTH political parties have been bought off by the Big Money interests.

    This was the first election in which I did not vote. I realized that regardless of who “won” the election, neither person would attempt to do very much for “the little guy,” as this is against Big Money’s interests. If that person did try to do too much, “they” simply would KILL HIM, as they did with John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, Walter Reuther (president of the United Auto Workers union), Jimmy Hoffa, John F. Kennedy, Jr. and thousands more.

    Speaking of killing, if one was to start up a museum that contained exhibits of the American citizens who have met with “untimely” or suspicious deaths, a building the size of a Walmart Supercenter would be needed and there still would not be enough room for all of the exhibits. Put simply, if “they” want you gone, YOU’RE GONE.

    You must be a member of the Optimists Club; I am a member of the “Pessimists Club.” I am a 69 year-old retired industrial electrician and the changes that I have seen take place in my country, in my lifetime, are absolutely shocking.

    In regards to “God’s grace” – as a former church-going Lutheran, it is my opinion that God is taking a hands-off approach to mankind. He is just sitting back and watching mankind destroy itself. As the Bible said, the rainbow was God’s covenant with man that the earth would never again be flooded; the next time, complete destruction would come by FIRE. BOTH the Republican and democratic parties are full of “neo-cons” and they are itching to start World War III.

    With what comparatively little time I have left on this earth, I do NOT see things getting any better; only WORSE. I am of the opinion that our country is so far “gone” that the only thing which would change anything would be revolution. And if that happens, I am afraid that will ne be pretty.

    Thank you.

  62. @Verity

    ”’Go and read Marx again …” That’ll be the day.

    All these soi-disant contributors whose knowledge of ‘Marxism’ is miniscule apparently feel no inhibitions about sounding of about ‘Marxism’. Here’s an idea: let them go away and get stuck in to the 3 Volumes of ‘Capital’ – 2000 pages – then the ‘Grundrisse’ – another 900 pages, then 3 Volumes of ‘Theories of Surplus Value another two thousand pages.

    Oh, and I haven’t even included the works of Marx’s co-thinker Freidrich Engels. In Orwell’s 1984 the principles of Ingsoc were War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is strength.

    Yep ignorance is strength okay. I guess these experts on Marxism (and everything else for that matter) are also experts on particle physics, or the works of Spinoza, or Wittegenstein, though I doubt it. Speaking of Wittgenstein in the Tractatus. He offered this sage advice:

    “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.”

    A good motto to live by.

  63. PolarBear says:

    Nothing inflated a Jews penis more than hungry homeless Weimar German street-kids on their knees begging for bagelcrumbs. That’s exactly what todays elite Jews want for the German people.

  64. Centaur says:

    He states, “Trump increased his raw vote even stronger.” He got more votes than he did in ’16 but he got beaten even more decisively in the popular vote than and was crushed in the electoral college. Losing by twice as many votes as you did in the previous election is in no way an example of being in any way “stronger.”

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gilad Atzmon Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World