The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewGilad Atzmon Archive
Dershowitz on the Promotion of Jewish Values (Precious)
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Dershowitz at his best moment. In his desperate attempt to defame Bernie Sanders, the Harvard professor has identified the enemy within: “the worst people in terms of not promoting Jewish values.” Dershowitz was referring to Norman Finkelstein, Karl Marx, Noam Chomsky and Gilad Atzmon. I guess that most people would regard the company above as guardians of justice and humanism. Not exactly a quality that can be attributed to Dershowitz and his arch pedo-pal Jeffrey Epstein and alleged serial rapist Harvey Weinstein.

Sooner or later, the American people will have to figure out how did lame characters such as Dershowitz have managed to invade their Ivy League institutions…

(Republished from Gilad Atzmon by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Alan Dershowitz 
Hide 86 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Truth3 says:

    Jewish Values?

    These people know no values. Only tactics.

    • Agree: Longfisher
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  2. Paul says:

    “the worst people in terms of not promoting Jewish values”

    Alan, do you mean such Jewish values as the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinian people (Canaanites)?

    • Agree: Longfisher
    • Replies: @Crazy Horse
  3. It’s funny.

    Given the atrocities Dershowitz likes to rationalize, the way he makes his living, the company that he keeps, and his apparent taste for underage shiksas, his implied claim that he instead represents ‘Jewish values’ is pretty clearly anti-semitic.

    Maybe he’s right. Should we take what Dershowitz’s practices and preaches as representing ‘Jewish values’? Defending torture and injustice, perverting justice, sexually exploiting underage girls — these are ‘Jewish values’?

    I don’t think much of the whole ‘Jewish values’ schtick — but I’d prefer not to think that Dershowitz actually exemplifies the moral average of the American Jewish community.

  4. @Truth3

    ‘Jewish Values?

    ‘These people know no values. Only tactics.’

    Meh. I don’t think Jews are really any worse than anyone else — merely no better.

    In general, about all they can be accused of is being a little bit too good at what they do. Sort of like the Germans weren’t really unique in deciding to ‘kill all the Jews’ — they were just unique in actually managing to stay on task and follow through on the resolution.

    Aside from that, really the major flaw in Jewry is their adoption of that singularly unfortunate cause — Zionism. That really implies all the crimes, deceit, and subversion of our political process that follows.

    Take away Israel, and Jews would really be no more than a somewhat excessively competitive ethnicity — and hey. We’ve all got our faults.

  5. I have always found Dershowitz despicable. Having said that, dragging Epstein and Weinstein into it minimalizes his references to Atzmon, Chomsky, Finklestein et al.
    While I find Epstein and Weinstein at the same level of despicableness as Dersch, the fact of the matter is that there is a foul odour coming from the narrative surrounding them. In Weinstein’s case, the casting couch has been an open secret for close to a century. The narrative that every single one of the women he “assaulted” didn’t know what was expected of them is simply not credible. Again, I’m not suggesting his motive and actions aren’t despicable, only that all of the “sweet innocent” actresses are full of shit pretending they were “horrified” by it because it was unexpected. That’s like a patient with a bad heart condition saying he was surprised by having a heart attack.
    The same for Epstein. Unlike parents of the grooming gang victims in the UK, none came forward to police. These girls were traveling internationally, how did they get passports, and why would their parents approve? What parent wouldn’t know if the child suddenly has large amounts of cash to spend after “visiting” Epstein? Again, Epstein’s actions are despicable, but the narrative has too many unanswered questions.
    At the end of the day, aren’t Epstein and Weinstein doing what people often complain about Jews to to Blacks in slum housing – exploiting people? In Epstein’s case, clearly illegally, in Weinstein’s case, not so obvious.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  6. @Curmudgeon

    ‘… The same for Epstein. Unlike parents of the grooming gang victims in the UK, none came forward to police. These girls were traveling internationally, how did they get passports, and why would their parents approve? What parent wouldn’t know if the child suddenly has large amounts of cash to spend after “visiting” Epstein? Again, Epstein’s actions are despicable, but the narrative has too many unanswered questions…’

    I think this is definitely blaming the victim. If I discover a vulnerable fourteen year old girl, the fact that I can sexually exploit her doesn’t somehow justify my doing so.

    Even more to the point, Epstein’s culpability is hardly the major issue here. Pretty definitely, a former premier of Israel, a former US President, and a Harvard professor took full advantage of what was on offer. Is nothing to be made of this at all?

    Epstein is slime — but that’s not the point. What about the so highly esteemed who so freely took advantage of what he was offering? Is their culpability to really be ignored?

    • Agree: Longfisher, Kratoklastes
    • Replies: @CBTerry
  7. Saggy says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    Meh. I don’t think Jews are really any worse than anyone else — merely no better.

    You’ve got to be joking ….. but if not, you need to read ‘You Gentiles’ where MS patiently explains that the Jews have no morals other than pleasing G–, and think that the morals of the goyim are just a game, like football, and not to be taken seriously, and … he makes pretty good case.

    But if you want a more immediate example, this is a favorite of mine ….
    https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/960660/jewish/Issurei-Biah-Chapter-Twelve.htm

    10
    If, by contrast, a Jewish male enters into relations with a gentile woman, when he does so intentionally, she should be executed.23 She is executed because she caused a Jew to be involved in an unseemly transgression, as [is the law with regard to] an animal.24 [This applies regardless of] whether the gentile women was a minor of three years of age,25 or an adult, whether she was single or married. And it applies even if [the Jew] was a minor of nine years old, [she is executed].26

    • Agree: druid55
  8. melpol says:

    Had sex with people of all persuasions and found Jewish sex values to be inline with most Americans. But their food tastes are different, some Jew like Kosher food. Jews also value social status more than Gentiles. That is why Jews are high achievers. Dershowitz, Epstein, and, Weinstein were as clever as any American genius. But their wisdom was unfairly questioned.

  9. Polemos says:
    @Colin Wright

    Meh. I don’t think Jews are really any worse than anyone else — merely no better.

    Where are you relative to Jews on this scale? Are you also merely no better than a Jew?

    You said we all have our faults, and maybe that’s true, but the quality and quantity might differ, right?

    And, like faults, we all have our singular causes, that Higher Good that ranks higher than the laws of other people, don’t we? And perhaps you are like us and your singular cause is also merely no better than Zionism, too?

    Or maybe you don’t have a higher purpose 😯

    • Agree: Cassandra
    • Replies: @Cassandra
  10. @Saggy

    ‘You’ve got to be joking ….. but if not, you need to read ‘You Gentiles’ where MS patiently explains that the Jews have no morals other than pleasing G–, and think that the morals of the goyim are just a game, like football, and not to be taken seriously, and … he makes pretty good case…’

    I’m sorry, but no — I’m not joking.

    I’ve known a lot of Jews — several of them very well.

    I draw my conclusions concerning them from that.

    • Replies: @Saggy
    , @animalogic
    , @druid55
  11. Saggy says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    I draw my conclusions concerning them from that.

    Do you know one that denies the holohoax, that says it is a 100% hoax, or is that topic off limits?

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  12. Skeptikal says:
    @Colin Wright

    “Aside from that, really the major flaw in Jewry . . .”

    Er, the major flaw in Jewry is exemplified by Dersh.
    Just look at him.

    And listen to him.

    His hysterical curses and threats against Sanders, worthy of the witches in Macbeth—Dersh’ll follow Sanders around braying at him and about him like a banshee, like a bloodsucker, like a succubus, like a voodoo queen . . . And all because Sanders endorsed Corbyn, a Labourite.

    Any Jew who sees this performance must cringe in disgust and shame.
    Even Larry King seems a bit taken aback . . .

  13. @Saggy

    ‘Do you know one that denies the holohoax, that says it is a 100% hoax, or is that topic off limits?’

    I’m afraid that’s never come up.

    You see, I believe in the Holohoax myself. You might as well ask if I’ve ever challenged a Jew about his belief in the existence of Australia.

  14. renfro says:

    Meh. I don’t think Jews are really any worse than anyone else — merely no better.

    While I agree Jews are not all alike……you need to be aware that regardless of your personal experiences…..Jews don’t talk to you like they talk to each other and rarely discuss their true opinions on gentiles or Israel with non Jews.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  15. @renfro

    I discuss my true opinions even with slops like you renfro, and I bet you are a non Jew.LOL
    Everything on here I say to all my Jew friends.

  16. Anonymous[108] • Disclaimer says:

    jewish values

  17. Huh? What’s Dershowitz’s beef with Karl Marx ? He was a cousin of the Rothschilds by marriage and it is said he even received money from them.

    https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Antisemitism/Israeli-ambassador-to-Portugal-condemns-publication-of-antisemitic-cartoon-616977

    Israeli ambassador to Portugal condemns publication of antisemitic cartoon
    Gamzou appealed to Sábado and other platforms to not “grant the Gargalo’s of this world the immunity and impunity that arise from the distortion of the concept of freedom of expression.”

    Israel’s Ambassador to Portugal condemned the publication of antisemitic cartoons by Portuguese cartoon artist Vasco Gargalo in the weekly Portuguese news magazine Sábado, in a letter to the director of the magazine.

    Portugal’s President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa gestures near national flags of Israel and Portugal upon landing at Ben Gurion International Airport to take part in a Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial event…….

  18. @Colin Wright

    Meh. I don’t think Jews are really any worse than anyone else — merely no better.

    In general, about all they can be accused of is being a little bit too good at what they do

    Appearing to be “a little bit too good at” a thing is easier if you abjure any obligation to observe cultural norms around where the boundary between ‘competition’ and ‘cheating’ should be drawn.

    If you’re playing singles but the umpire requires your opponent to defend the doubles boundaries, you’ll make more outright winners.

    Cela explique tout.

    If you’ve never seen the Seinfeld episode in which George tries to finagle his way to a ‘good’ IQ test, you might take the claimed estimate of groupwise US-Ashkenazi IQ at face value… as a f’r’instance.

    However if you have seen it, and you think what society would have been like in the shtetls if it had 4x as many geniuses per capita as the US… it becomes clear that it’s a fiction.

    That’s why I discount anyone who claims a tested IQ in the 120s; that is ‘gettable’ through re-testing by anyone with a first-test IQ of 115.

    Conversely, a 125 can’t re-test up to 135: a 0.6σ improvement from +σ is two orders of magnitude easier than the same improvement from +1.6σ. (Also, a 135 should have concomitants: e.g., outstanding achievement in at least 1 cognitive domain).

    Anyhow… outperformance can be generated in quite a few ways: by taking on more risk; by nepotism or corruption; or by actual talent.

    My money’s on ‘B’, on the simple basis that otherwise the Industrial Revolution would have started in a hovel in Ukraine or Belarus… instead, at the same period in history (late 18th century) the Ashkenazim ‘invented’ a more pernicious version of tribal horse-shit (which is a level of ‘achievement’ that you would expect from a population with bog-standard cognition, and systemic dishonesty towards outgroups as a cultural norm)

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  19. @Saggy

    When I saw your post I doubted that this book by this author, Maurice Samuel, existed, or even that the author existed. I searched for it in the library of a university and didn’t find it. Then I saw that the library of one university in Germany seems to have an exemplar of the book. Even though I thought it highly unlikely that you could find the passage that you quote. It can easily be a fake quote. I searched the book further as a used book and found the following description about it (I quote a part of it):

    Ostara Publications, United States, 2018. Paperback. Zustand: New. Annotated edition. Language: English. Brand new Book. Written in 1924, this shocking classic work of Jewish Supremacism maps out what the avowedly Zionist author saw as the cause of anti-Semitism through the ages: an irreconcilable difference between Jews and all Gentiles, but Europeans in particular. This difference, Samuel argued, was inherent and biological in origin. The author argues that the real point of difference between Jew and Gentile is that the Gentiles follow what he calls the base “triviality” of Gentiles versus the God-like “seriousness” of Jews. This huge psychological difference, Samuel says, is the reason why Jews regard “playful” Gentiles as backward and silly, and why Gentiles will never be able to penetrate the Jewish perception of the world.The book goes on to discuss the main points of difference in behavior between Jews and Gentiles focusing on physical activity, religion, concepts of good and evil, loyalty, science, fair play, and discipline. Maurice spells out why Jews have different attitudes to all these moral and philosophical issues–and why these values are the opposite of those endorsed by Gentiles. Samuel then says that these inherent and unchangeable differences will always make the Jews out to be “destroyers” and the “subverters” of European culture and society. Finally, he discusses the dangers presented to Jews by intermarriage with Gentiles, and concludes by saying that there will never be peace between Jew and Gentile until the last European state has “lost its racial homogeneity.”

    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @Saggy
  20. @Colin Wright

    I understand the point you are trying to make & it’s roughly valid.
    However, there are distinctions to be made. Some Jew’s are not self consciously “jewish”.
    They are British, Brazilian or Iranian. Their culture is British, Brazilian etc. They don’t associate with other Jew’s because they’re Jewish. These people are of minimal interest.
    However, there are some Jew’s who define themselves (exclusively) as Jew’s.
    They self organise. They believe in the Torah & Talmud. They consciously define themselves in contradiction to non-jews. They “buy into” all the Jewish myths, values etc. They are Zionists in their DNA.
    They have no compunction in exploitating or manipulating their non-jew fellow citizens for the benefit of their own corporate or Zionist interests. These Jewish people are an issue.
    A very serious issue, if for no other reason than they wield so much power via their control over the US.

    • Replies: @Bert
  21. @Colin Wright

    You are a fool.
    Behind your back, all the Jews that you think are your ‘friend’ laugh about you. They would sell you out in a Jew York minute.
    70 million died in WW2 yet 98% of the media focus of that period is about ‘so-called’ Jewish suffering. You don’t seem to have much of an ability to discriminate reality from fantasy. These people have no friends outside their tribe, only allies.

  22. kikl says:

    Well, his position could be summarized thus:

    Right or Wrong, doesn’t matter, my tribe!

    Anyone who merely tolerates “antisemitism” is evil, like Mr. Sanders. Then why do we Goyim have to tolerate jewish hatred for goyim?

    Say, we persecuted jewish goy-haters just like Dershowitz persecutes anyone who he perceives to be “antisemitic”. What would happen to the jews? What would happen to Mr. Dershowitz who apparently tolerates jewish anti-goyism. He has never spoken out against jewish anti-goyism.

    For some reason, these jewish geniuses never appear to understand the implications of their actions.

  23. Saggy says: • Website
    @UncommonGround

    When I saw your post I doubted that this book by this author, Maurice Samuel, existed,

    It’s $8.95 on Amazon …https://www.amazon.com/You-Gentiles-Maurice-Samuel/dp/1643701169/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=you+gentiles+paperback&qid=1581256603&sr=8-1

    It is a slightly amazing book. Here’s another quote from another book by another author, from Nahum Goldmann’s 1915 book ‘The Spirit of Militarism’

    Nahum Goldmann lived his whole life as one of the top level international Zionists, he was the president of the World Jewish Congress from 1947 to 19788, and in his 1915 book “The Spirit Of Militarism” (page37 – 38) he describes the Zionist method for destruction of Western Civilization which is required for transition into the New World Order. Below is an english translation from the copy housed in the collection of the Leo Baeck Institute.

    The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone.

    The forces preserving traditional society are “free market capitalism” in the social economic realm, and “democracy” in the mental political realm. The capitalist free market does not fight against the old economic order, nor does democracy lead a fierce hot battle against the forces of reaction which oppose the new order, therefore our transformative work will be imposed through the unifying principle of the militaristic spirit, the negative task of destroying the old established order will be completely solved and finished only when the all the human masses are all forcibly collectivized as uniformed soldiers under imposed mass-conformity of new order culturing.

    After destruction of the old order, construction of the new order is a larger and more difficult task. We will have torn out the old limbs from their ancient roots in deep layers, social norms will be lying disorganized and anarchic so they must be blocked against new cultural forms and social catagories naturally re-emerging. The general masses will have been first persuaded to join as equals in the first task of destroying their own traditional society and economic culture, but then the new order must be forcibly established through people again being divided and differentiated only in accordance with the new pyramidal hierarchical system of our imposed global monolithic new world order.

    Capitalism must be condemned as a fundamental misfortune caused by the wealth of capitalist power exploiting the false separation between the high rulers and the oppressed exploited masses. The masses must be induce to repudiate the concept of personal wealth and personal rights, this second task will also be solved only by virtue of the great guiding principle of the subordinating militaristic spirit in which superior ranks impose order on inferiors, which will bring the true aristocratic principle of “might is right” in the new world order: “those who can rule – shall rule”.
    The spirit of militarism, Der Geist des Militarismus, Stuttgart, 1915, p.37 – 38

    The German source is available here ….

    https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=osu.32435017233032;view=1up;seq=8

    ORIGINAL GERMAN
    Nachum Goldmann 1915.
    So besteht denn die erste Aufgabe unserer Zeit in der Zerstörung. Alle sozialen Schichtungen und gesellschaftlichen Formungen, die das alte System geschaffen hat, müssen vernichtet, die einzelnen Menschen müssen aus ihren angestammten Milieus herausgerissen werden; keine Tradition darf mehr als heilig gelten; das Alter gilt nur als Zeichen der Krankheit; die Parole heißt: was war, muß weg. Die Kräfte, die diese negative Aufgabe unserer Zeit ausführen, sind: auf dem wirtschaftlich-sozialen Gebiete der Kapitalismus, auf dem politisch-geistigen die Demokratie. Wieviel sie bereits geleistet haben, wissen wir alle; aber wir wissen auch, daß ihr Werk noch nicht ganz vollbracht ist. Noch kämpft der Kapitalismus gegen die Formen der alten, traditionellen Wirtschaft, noch führt die Demokratie einen heißen Kampf gegen alle Kräfte der Reaktion. Vollenden wird das Werk der militaristische Geist. Sein Uniformierungsprinzip wird die negative Aufgabe der Zeit restlos durchführen: wenn erst alle Glieder unseres Kulturkreises als Soldaten unseres Kultursystems uniformiert sind, ist diese eine Aufgabe gelöst. Dann aber erst erhebt sich die andere, größere und schwierigere Aufgabe: der Aufbau der neuen Ordnung. Die Glieder, die nun aus ihren alten Verwurzelungen und Schichtungen herausgerissen sind und ungeordnet, anarchisch herumliegen, müssen zu neuen Formungen und Kategorien geschlossen werden; wurden bei der Lösung der ersten Aufgabe alle zunächst einmal für gleich erklärt, so müssen die Menschen nun wieder geteilt und differenziert: ein neues pyramidales, hierarchisches System muß errichtet werden. Auch diese Aufgabe versuchte der Kapitalismus zu lösen; wir wissen, mit welchem Mißgeschick. Er nahm die fundamentale Trennung in Herrschende und Beherrschte nach falschen Gesichtspunkten vor: nach denjenigen des Reichtums, der kapitalistischen Macht. Auch diese zweite Aufgabe wird nur der militaristische Geist lösen können kraft seines anderen großen Leitprinzips der Subordination. Er wird den wahren aristokratischen Grundsatz zur Herrschaft bringen: Herrschen soll, wer herrschen kann.“
    Der Geist des Militarismus, Stuttgart 1915, Seite 38?

    • Thanks: UncommonGround
    • Replies: @Chet Roman
  24. Nodwink says:

    I saw the brief video you posted on Twitter, and the basis of Dersh’s animus toward Bernie is his support for Corbyn. If I were President Bernie, I would move to put Dersh in jail for the rest of his life.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  25. BuelahMan says:

    I find it impossible to reconcile “Dershowitz” and “values” in the same sentence.

    • Replies: @Ben_Silverbergstein
  26. Some of us are getting wrapped around the axle on the essential evil nature of Jews. In fact, the Enlightenment did Jews a world of good. They were quite happy as humanists until the Jew supremacists repackaged their genocidal origin myth as nationalism. Jews fell for it as Zionism, hook, line and sinker, and now every Israeli crime against humanity cues orchestrated Jewish mass hysteria. Smart Jews are tired of it, but they tell me so under their breath.

    Zionazi Jews are simply people who have been deprived of their human right to education and brainwashed into monsters.

    Article 26: “Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

    “Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.”

    Jew supremacists shit on every word of that. They do a kind of foot-binding for the human personality to produce grasping tribal throwbacks consumed with hatred of the other. They try to infect everybody with their hate and fear. It’s not working any more.

    • Replies: @Saggy
    , @follyofwar
  27. Saggy says: • Website
    @Shoah us your tits

    Jew supremacists shit on every word of that. They do a kind of foot-binding for the human personality to produce grasping tribal throwbacks consumed with hatred of the other. They try to infect everybody with their hate and fear.

    In Israel they begin early ….
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/BFNgVpOzzQpq/

  28. CBTerry says:
    @Colin Wright

    I hope you are not implying that every girl under 18 who was sexually involved with Epstein was a victim.

    We know that Epstein used high school girls to recruit other high school girls, and per the Palm Beach Post, “one Royal Palm Beach High student told detectives in 2005 that she targeted promiscuous teens on campus.” She didn’t target choir girls.

    The sexual immorality of today’s youth, uncaring and enabling parents, and the unwillingness of people to accept responsibility for their moral choices is what allowed “a former premier of Israel, a former US President, and a Harvard professor [to take] full advantage of what was on offer.”

    The above should face full legal consequences for whatever laws they violated, but this would not resolve the underlying problem. There is no quick solution to societal collapse.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  29. Per CBTerry: “…The sexual immorality of today’s youth…”

    What do you mean by that? From everything I’ve read, teenagers and millennials are having less heterosexual sex than ever, and teenage pregnancy (at least among whites) has gone way down. The lack of sex among young white youth has become a great concern throughout First World countries, as very few are achieving even close to replacement rate. We are actually living in a new Puritanism brought about by Feminism.

    • Replies: @CBTerry
  30. @Shoah us your tits

    It’s not “foot-binding for the human personality.” It’s circumcision! And, ever since Saint Paul grew the new Christian faith two thousand years ago, it always has been.

    Sigmund Freud was at least correct once in his life when he said that “circumcision is at the heart of anti-Semitism.” And he did not circumcise his sons. Nor did Zionist Theodor Herzl, who refused to allow his son Hans to be circumcised.

    The American goys need to wake the F up and quit mutilating their boys. We have fallen into their trap with our acceptance of such a vile, degrading practice.

    • Agree: CBTerry
  31. The story of Anglo-Americanism is the striving to make the US less Anglo-centric.

    The story of Jewish-Americanism is the striving to make the US more Judeo-centric.

    Guess who won?

  32. Hazony, another fraud.

  33. anarchyst says:
    @follyofwar

    Circumcision IS male genital mutilation. PERIOD!
    Circumcision (male genital mutilation) should be outlawed. Of course, the jews will scream and shout, but, so what?
    A disgusting, dirty secret among jews is that when “mohels” perform circumcision on infants, their practice is to physically suck on the newly-deformed penis after the foreskin is removed. There have been many instances of STDs being transmitted from these dirty mohels to their young victims. Maybe that is the reason jews are so twisted…

  34. DaveE says:
    @Colin Wright

    C’mon. Zionism and Judaism are one in the same; “God’s Chosen People” reclaiming their “Promised Land” while killing or enslaving anyone who gets in their way.

    Zionism and Judaism are interchangeable terms, straight from page one paragraph one of the Hebrew “Bible” (sic I realize) .

    • Agree: Druid
    • Replies: @christine
  35. @CBTerry

    ‘…but this would not resolve the underlying problem. There is no quick solution to societal collapse.’

    That society’s massive dysfunction makes these girls available is true enough — but that doesn’t excuse exploiting them.

    Ehud Barak et al’s criminal immorality remains inexcusable — and the question becomes, ‘why is so little attention paid to it?’

    Trump talked about ‘grabbing women by the pussy’ — freely consenting, adult women, by the way — and the media went apeshit.

    A former American President and a former Prime Minister of ‘our closest ally in the Middle East,’ etc take advantage of underaged girls served up to them in the privacy (and captivity) of an airliner cruising at 35,000 feet — and it’s discreetly swept into the memory hole.

    So we can talk about massive social collapse as well if you like — but let’s talk about this too.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @CBTerry
  36. CBTerry says:
    @follyofwar

    A valid point.

    I don’t find anything wrong with heterosexual teenage sex per se. Teenage mothers were probably normative until rather recently. And I have seen how easily teenagers can give birth versus the ordeals undergone by first time mothers even in their late twenties.

    What we have now, for women, is (largely) sex without consequences. Get pregnant, get an abortion. Indeed, our culture promotes abortion as the epitome of female empowerment, which is presumed to be good. With sex shorn of reproduction as a moral value, it is no wonder that some high school girls would be eager to give a massage to some billionaire for a bunch of cash.

    As for the lack of sex, I agree that few young white men are having heterosexual sex. And why should they? They are likely to be castigated and possibly prosecuted as rapists. I suspect that this is also resulting in an increase in sexual deviancy and the LGBTQRS movement.

    I would be interested if the lack of white youth sex applies to woman as well as men. I just do not know, but I suspect that it may be less for women because of polygyny and interracial sex. Our society positively encourages white women to have sex with non-white men, and as Steve Sailer has shown in regards to college athletics, there is a strong presumption that such sex is consensual, even when the woman argues otherwise — the complete opposite of the case when the man is white.

    As for your claims of a new Puritanism, I agree. Which is why I am hesitant about blanket statements that the girls involved with Epstein, Dershowitz et al. are victims.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  37. @CBTerry

    ‘…As for your claims of a new Puritanism, I agree. Which is why I am hesitant about blanket statements that the girls involved with Epstein, Dershowitz et al. are victims.’

    Here, I think we need to discriminate between what goes on in many traditional societies and what Ehud Barak et al were practicing.

    It is one thing when a fifteen year old girl marries a man — even an older man — and becomes a wife and presumably mother in a society where that is the norm. She moves through a life in a respectable role, presumably as fulfilled and happy as most of us, and eventually passes away, beloved and respected by all.

    Nu? Your life is so much better?

    It’s another thing entirely to pick up some bewildered teenage runaway or whatever, enjoy her body, and then throw her away like a piece of used chewing gum when you get tired of her.

    The resemblance between the two sets of behaviors is entirely superficial.

    The image linked below is not what Epstein was offering these girls.

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tripimprover.com%2Fblog%2Fthe-russian-brides-attire-by-konstantin-makovsky&psig=AOvVaw1vgYbfzXf3Ue-7HbRbM_LK&ust=1581360385651000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCMCpstKQxecCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAI

    • Replies: @CBTerry
  38. CBTerry says:
    @Colin Wright

    Well, I think we all know why there is so little attention being paid to it! As a friend of mine once said about a completely different matter, “you don’t have to be Columbo to figure this one out.”

    When I am around people talking about Epstein it is in regards to Prince Andrew. The Prince is good for a few cheap laughs, but then I bring up Ghislane Maxwell, Les Wexner (they all have heard of Victoria’s Secret, but his name always draws a blank), and Ehud Barak – and invariably it is new to them.

    Alas, we have a lot of educating to do.

  39. Emergence of Libyan Jews on Political Scene Revives Debate over Minorities
    Sunday, 9 February,

    https://aawsat.com/english/home/article/2122776/emergence-libyan-jews-political-scene-revives-debate-over-minorities

    A meeting between United Nations envoy to Libya, Ghassan Salame, with the President of the Union of Jews of Libya, Raphael Luzon, in Geneva earlier this week revived a debate about the role non-Arab minorities can play in shaping the war-torn country’s future…….

    Returning to Luzon’s announcement, the UN mission has yet to make a comment, but officials in Libya were quick to question the timing of the move given high tensions in the country.

    MP Jaballah al-Shibani said the UN mission’s recognition of the Union of Jews of Libya as a party that should be represented in dialogue on the country’s future is a violation of its tasks.

    With this recognition, the mission has moved from working on Libya’s stability to imposing a form of hegemony on the country, he stated.

    “While recognizing them as Libyans, they are not parties in the conflict. Dialogue is usually restricted to the warring parties, not onlookers,” he remarked.

    “We are not being racist, but we are questioning the timing of the move. Why now? And for whose interest? Why don’t we leave the Jewish issue to until after the state is restored,” he suggested. “Isn’t this a provocation against all Libyans? Couldn’t this lead to a boycott of the dialogue?”…..

  40. CBTerry says:
    @Colin Wright

    I agree that it is another thing entirely, but it is not clear to me that every girl Epstein picked up was “some bewildered 15 year-old teenage runaway or whatever.” In fact, the only teenage girl I have really heard about regarding Epstein was Virginia Giuffre, and she sure didn’t look bewildered when Prince Andrew had his arm around her.

    I also suspect that the most victimized girls were brought from overseas with promises of VS modeling gigs and then ended up in Epstein’s townhouse. Can you imagine thinking you are coming over to be a VS model and then ending up in a room with Ehud Barak?

    The problem with pursuing this argument further is that few reliable details of the girls have emerged so there is too much room for speculation.

    But regardless, the conduct of Epstein and the others was reprehensible. World leaders should act like adults, not frat boys.

  41. Completely off topic Gilad but I heard your Talinka album (not all of ). It sounds like a combination of Kurt Weil, and Philip Glass. I liked it.
    All Jews all the time!!!

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  42. Art says:
    @Colin Wright

    ‘Jewish Values’

    Oh my’ – what a dedicated attorney — what a guy – what fine Jew values — Dershowitz did many house calls for Epstein.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  43. Crazy Horse says: • Website
    @Paul

    According to the Book of Genocide AKA Deuteronomy.

    • Agree: freedom-cat
  44. @CBTerry

    ‘I agree that it is another thing entirely, but it is not clear to me that every girl Epstein picked up was “some bewildered 15 year-old teenage runaway or whatever.” …’

    This one was fourteen.

    https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article235221457.html

  45. @Fran Taubman

    ‘Completely off topic Gilad but I heard your Talinka album (not all of ). It sounds like a combination of Kurt Weil, and Philip Glass. I liked it.
    All Jews all the time!!!’

    Pretty clumsy, Fran. It’ll never work.

    Come on, now. Let’s see you deploy some of that ‘intellectual heft’ you claimed to have.

  46. @CBTerry

    ‘I agree that it is another thing entirely, but it is not clear to me that every girl Epstein picked up was “some bewildered 15 year-old teenage runaway or whatever.”…’

    Now we’re down to eleven years old.

    ‘Prosecutors in the U.S. Virgin Islands have unveiled a new lawsuit against the estate of Jeffrey Epstein alleging that over two decades he ran a conspiracy in which he transported young women and girls to his private Caribbean islands by helicopter and boat and then subjected them to sexual abuse.
    Authorities claim Epstein’s sexual predation on the hideaway islands occurred as recently as 2018 and involved children as young as 11 years old. The suit alleges the activity was covered up by Epstein’s associates through a complex web of corporations.
    In one instance, investigators say a 15-year-old who was forced into sexual acts with Epstein attempted to escape by swimming off one of Epstein’s private islands, Little St. James. Eventually, Epstein’s crew found her after assembling a search team and took her passport, prosecutors say…’

    I like the girl trying to escape by swimming. Maybe she wasn’t having such a good time.

    • Replies: @CBTerry
  47. @Art

    ‘Oh my’ – what a dedicated attorney — what a guy – what fine Jew values — Dershowitz did many house calls for Epstein.’

    Alan Dershowitz is — how should I put this — foolish?

    If I were a high profile criminal lawyer, and Harvard law professor, and Mighty Warrior for Zion, and I liked to play love ’em and leave ’em with the sixteen-year-old set — I’d keep my mouth shut about statutory rape. Absolute horror — never touched anyone under eighteen myself.

    Yet he’s apparently quite upset about statutory rape laws — and vocal on the point. Thinks the age of consent should be lowered to fifteen. I favor ‘Romeo and Juliet’ laws myself, but this is ridiculous:

    https://www.thecut.com/2019/07/alan-dershowitz-doubles-down-on-his-statutory-rape-views.html

    Plus, I’m not a public figure. One of Dershowitz’s opponents, Norm Finkelstein, wrote a book entitled Beyond Chutzpah.

    He wasn’t talking about Dershowitz — but he could have been. Aside from the gross immorality, the sheer arrogance is stunning.

    • Replies: @Saggy
  48. Saggy says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    Thinks the age of consent should be lowered to fifteen.

    …… Aside from the gross immorality, the sheer arrogance is stunning.

    Immorality? Not by Jewish standards …. Justice Ginsburg wrote an article recommending that the age of consent be lowered to 12 …..
    https://www.quora.com/Has-Justice-Ginsburg-stated-that-the-age-of-consent-should-be-12

    Yes, in the book ‘Sex Bias in the US Code’ which is available online at

    https://www.law.umaryland.edu/ma…

    (page 102 in the text, 110 in the pdf)

    “Recommendations …..

    18 U.S.C. §2032 — Eliminate the phrase “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” and substitute a Federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense patterned after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person’s power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old

    102

    I suppose it could have been worse, as Ginsburg is Jewish and Judaism has this to say about extramarital sexual relations between a Jewish man and a gentile woman or girl above the age of 3 …

    https://www.chabad.org/library/a…

    (

    Mishah Torah – Sefer Kedushah – Issurei Biah – Chapter Twelve)

    10

    If, by contrast, a Jewish male enters into relations with a gentile woman, when he does so intentionally, she should be executed.23 She is executed because she caused a Jew to be involved in an unseemly transgression, as [is the law with regard to] an animal.24 [This applies regardless of] whether the gentile women was a minor of three years of age,25 or an adult, whether she was single or married. And it applies even if [the Jew] was a minor of nine years old, [she is executed].26

    This [punishment] is explicitly mentioned in the Torah, as [Numbers 31:16-17] states: Behold they were [involved] with the children of Israel according to the advice of Balaamו.27 Execute any woman fit to know a man through lying with a male.

    At this point one might object that in Israel the Jews do not execute gentile women and girls above 3 y.o. who have been violated by Jewish men, but, there is an explanation – which you can hear in this 10 minute video by Israeli ex-yeshiva student Yossi Gurvitz (google him) …

  49. @follyofwar

    Yes. Barbaric. I was present for two unwittingly, not my kids, and I can tell you it’s no small or quick thing. Most don’t realize that the Academy of Pediatrics no longer recommends it. It should be illegal or at least not the default. But that would be antisemitic. Or something.

  50. CBTerry says:
    @Colin Wright

    I an not going to back down from my original, mild point: “I hope you are not implying that every girl under 18 who was sexually involved with Epstein was a victim. ”

    I do not even like the term “victim” because it is vague. It sort of suggests that they were raped but does not imply this.

    Let me quote from an article you cited:
    “Doe, now in her early 30s, was brought to Epstein’s New York mansion by the teenager [a girlfriend who recruited her] and the two of them were led by maids up to a massage room, where they were directed to undress, the lawsuit says. Does was uncomfortable, but went through with the massage, during which Epstein masturbated while instructing the two girls to pinch his nipples. He then paid Jane Doe $300 in cash.

    Epstein’s schedulers called Doe a few days later and she returned. Each time, the massages turned more sexual. Epstein pressured Doe to have oral sex, and directed her to engage in sex with other girls and an older, unidentified woman, the lawsuit says.”

    Doe could not have been too “uncomfortable” with the massage and pinching Epstein’s nipples while he masturbated given that she voluntarily returned several more times, presumably getting paid each time.

    Accepting the above facts as accurate, I would say that Epstein is a sexual degenerate and the girl is a harlot.

    • Replies: @christine
  51. @Nodwink

    I saw the brief video you posted on Twitter, and the basis of Dersh’s animus toward Bernie is his support for Corbyn.

    And the basis for name calling Corbyn an anti-semite is his support for Palestinians.

    Like the comment thread though, especially the clear-headed discussion on age of consent laws and the quaint Puritan notion that girls are victims always. They should bring back fainting and smelling salts.

  52. christine says:
    @DaveE

    @DaveE

    Judaism and Zionism are not one and the same.

    Try telling a ‘true Torah Jew’ that as they reject and oppose the Zionism that sprung from the highly questionable and hate filled Talmud that came after the Torah.

    Only a fool would call the Torah evil and any one who calls them self a Jew and disregards Torah laws/commandments are just pseudo Jews who couldn’t be more lost in life.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  53. christine says:
    @CBTerry

    @CBTerry

    I agree with you about the girls being harlots(I would call them young whore sluts just doing a dirty job) but I wouldn’t call Epstein a sexual degenerate because all of the girls it appears were of a sexually mature age and so can hardly be considered children anymore and so I completely disagree with others(like Atzmon)who always wrongly label the Lolita island frequent flyers as pedo’s.

    Unlike the wholly evil child sexual molesting crime against nature, what Epstein did with teenage whores most certainly wasn’t a crime against nature and the same can be said for Clinton and prince Andrew etc who were just doing what comes naturally.(I heard the 15 year old yank girl in the London photo with Andrew with Ghislane Maxwell was paid £1500 and so no wonder she has such a happy non exploited smile)

    Really, it is perfectly natural for a man to be sexually attracted to any young woman of child bearing age just for the sake of species continuation and anyone who believes otherwise needs to travel more in the third world and I should point out that it was only very recently that Spain changed its sexual age law to 16 up from 14 and that was probably due to nanny EU pressure and its up to a 15 year young whore if she wants to sell her self for sex but she shouldn’t turn round later and say she was exploited because she entered into a business transaction and that was that and so the real wrong doers here are the girls just trying to scam some more money out of wealthy men and that is a crime against nature.

    If Epstein was blackmailing others in a Mossad operation then he is guilty of that of course but give me a break about him being guilty of a sex crime against nature regardless of it beimg a crime in a first world country like U.S and that empire of evil can hardly be trusted with anything.

    • Replies: @Kali
    , @renfro
    , @Colin Wright
  54. Bert says:
    @animalogic

    Colin Wright and other Gentile apologists for Jewish power often resort to the “Some of the best people I know are Jewish” tactic. They assume that most Gentiles don’t know anything about population genetics, and on that they are correct. But in fact population genetics explains why so much societal damage is done by a minority of Jews. The Ashkenazi population probably has a particularly high frequency of genes inclining the carrier individual to be xenophic, as a result of their exploitative history in Eastern Europe. This means that during reproduction within the Ashkenazim genetic recombination will produce a substantial percentage of highly xenophobic Jews who will be the ones who damage Caucasian societies. When Ashkenazim intermarry outside their ethnic group, it doesn’t help because those outbreeding individuals are the ones not genetically inclined to xenophobia. The Jewish xenophobes won’t be diluting their genetic heritage by intermarriage.

  55. anarchyst says:
    @christine

    The Torah is just as evil as the Jewish Talmud as it commands the “chosen” to obliterate” entire civilizations without regard for humanity–total destruction.
    Christianity’s mistake was to adopt the Torah as part of Christian biblical doctrine–warts and all…

    • Agree: Kali
  56. druid55 says:
    @Colin Wright

    So oyou really don’t know them that well. I know Jews who are nice guys, but under the surface, zionists and chosenites!

  57. Kali says:
    @christine

    Here’s where you lost me Christine:

    so the real wrong doers here are the girls just trying to scam some more money out of wealthy men and that is a crime against nature.

    In the picture you paint, of young but sexually mature women having sex, why does anyone have to be deemed to be at fault?

    That Epstein wanted nubile younget girls to perform kinky sex acts on and with him and his wealthy cabal, and was willing to pay for that is fine… UNTIL you consider that those young girls are literally ripe for exploitation and perversion by older, more sexually and emotionally “advanced” sadists, proficient in the art of manipulation.

    Not to mention the huge pull of peer pressure, and the lure of money and adventure.

    And what of the Cultural Disfunction which would lead a young girl (or boy) away from the “protection” of her family and community into such a deborched environment, for the sexual gratification and political blackmail of a cabal of powerful old men and women.

    And you “blame” the girls because they were paid – in a world where access to money buys material security and a degree of choice and “freedom”.

    It’s heartbreaking really, how low we’ve sunk as a species, that we would condemn a child for making unwise choices in a world which celebrates and glorifies the deborched.

    Peace,
    Kali.

    • Replies: @christine
  58. renfro says:
    @christine

    I agree with you about the girls being harlots(I would call them young whore sluts just doing a dirty job) but I wouldn’t call Epstein a sexual degenerate because all of the girls it appears were of a sexually mature age and so can hardly be considered children anymore and so I completely disagree with others(like Atzmon)who always wrongly label the Lolita island frequent flyers as pedo’s.

    That a underage girl might have sex willingly and or for money does not relieve the man from responsibility.
    Whether a girl is sexually mature enough for sex has nothing to do with whether she has ‘mature judgement’ since the brain is not even fully mature until the 20’s.

    Most men would ‘restrain’ themselves from taking advantage of someone not sufficiently mature enough to make judgement calls. That is why in law there is a difference in prosecuting/judging adolescents vr. adults.

    While the girls in question who took money can’t claim anything like ‘rape’ they were still ‘exploited’ due to their immaturity.
    If you don’t think Epstein was a pervert you’ve got a judgement problem yourself.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @christine
  59. @christine

    Hmm. There’s…

    ‘… I wouldn’t call Epstein a sexual degenerate because all of the girls it appears were of a sexually mature age…’

    But then there’s…

    ‘…Authorities claim Epstein’s sexual predation on the hideaway islands occurred as recently as 2018 and involved children as young as 11 years old…”

    We appear to have a contradiction here.

    • Replies: @christine
  60. anarchyst says:

    Jewish values…ha ha

    Let’s look at “jewish values”

    1. Total destruction of cultures by parasitism

    2. Total destruction of countries and civilizations by outright warfare

    3. Usury, manipulation of world financial systems and banks for jewish advantage

    4. Business practices unique to jews-double standard when dealing with gentiles

    5. Debasement of cultures through control of mass-media, introducing decadence

    6. Use of “lawfare” to destroy cultures through the court system

    7. Control of the world “white slavery” (prostitution) system

    8. The promotion of “civil-rights” laws, but only against gentiles

    9. Multiculturalism, diversity, uncontrolled immigration, but only in gentile countries

    10. Extradition of criminal jews prohibited if criminal jews escape to israel

    11. Jewish supremacy not to be questioned

    12. Israel territory promised to jews by god, yeah right, god is not a real estate agent

    13 Apartheid practiced by jews, not only in israel, but in the USA as well

  61. christine says:
    @Colin Wright

    And you believe everything anyone in ‘authority’ tells you?.Like a president?.

    All the Lolita island girl pics show girls in their teens and that is probably the age of all of them and Epstein himself said he wasn’t attracted to children and that like me he regarded a 15 year old as a young woman who most certainly is not a child anymore.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  62. christine says:
    @Kali

    You call them children if you like Kali but I call them young well paid whore hussy women who are completely wrong and therefore ‘at fault’ to try and get more money out of Epstein when the business contract is long over.

    Epstein didn’t like to be called what he was called and that is because he knew damn well that
    he wasn’t a child molester.

    I doubt you will find many 14-16 year old male or females who would be happy if they were called ‘young boy or young girl’ and why do you call Epstein a sadist or kinky when what he was doing is what comes naturally to many many people?.

  63. christine says:
    @renfro

    So if they don’t have ‘mature judgement’ until 20+ why is the age of consent much younger?.

    Actually the young woman were recruited ‘due to their maturity’ and that is the point as they were not children and if they were exploited for sex then the wealthy and famous men were also exploited but for their money and so just like any other business transaction both parties are ‘taking advantage’ .(no wonder that picture with Andrew shows the teen whore with such a happy smile)

    If you think Epstein was a pervert then you’ve got a judgement problem yourself and you need to get out more in the third world where no one bats an eyelid to a 13-16 year old with a baby.

    • Replies: @renfro
    , @Druid
  64. christine says:

    Actually Renfro the only ‘exploitation’ and ‘taking advantage’ is by the former teen whores who at the time agreed to do a sexual service for an agreed(and therefore non exploitative) cost, only for them years later to try and exploit and take advantage of wealthy and famous men.

  65. Kali says:

    Newsflash!

    Epstein didn’the kill himself!
    Epstein isn’the dead!
    Epstein trolls the Unz Review as commenter ‘christine’!

    Blame the victim. Do not examine the circumstances of the victim. Do not question the the massive advantages of the billionaire MOSSAD asset or his blackmail network!

    Protect and defend the billionaire MOSSAD asset at all costs!”

    I feel sick.
    What a fucked-up world we live in!

    Kali.

    • Replies: @christine
  66. @Colin Wright

    >> “Sort of like the Germans weren’t really unique in deciding to ‘kill all the Jews’ ”

    You are repeating Jewish propaganda.

    • Agree: Kali
    • Replies: @flashlight joe
  67. @flashlight joe

    Sorry Colin. I missed the sarcasm. Too early in the morning.

  68. @christine

    ‘he regarded a 15 year old as a young woman who most certainly is not a child anymore…’

    That is at best a half-truth — that rationalizes some probably very damaging exploitation of a person who is if no longer a child, most certainly not a ‘young adult.’ What do you think happened to these ‘young women’ Epstein exploited? Do you think they’re currently enjoying careers as successful young professionals?

    Even if they were already on their way down, was it really right for Epstein to give them a helpful shove?

    Most importantly, see my post #37. For these girls, their relationship with Epstein — and whoever he ‘shared’ them with — wasn’t part of a normal and reasonable life. It was their introduction to a life as disposable people — to be taken, used, and tossed aside.

    On the one hand, I don’t particularly like how this leads me to take up a position of moralizing prudery — that really would be hypocrisy. On the other hand, I can see perfectly well what the moral and practical content of Epstein’s, Barak’s, Clinton’s, Dershowitz’s — et al, presumably — behavior was, and it’s clear to me that it’s evil — to use an old-fashioned word.

    This isn’t some early-nineteenth century rural worthy finding a young bride and giving her the life everyone else has. This is utterly revolting.

    • Replies: @christine
    , @christine
  69. @BuelahMan

    he kept his underwear on, can you say the same?

  70. renfro says:
    @christine

    If you think Epstein was a pervert then you’ve got a judgement problem yourself and you need to get out more in the third world where no one bats an eyelid to a 13-16 year old with a baby.

    This isnt a third world…yet anyway.
    Although scum like you is trying to make it so.

    • Agree: Wally
    • Replies: @christine
  71. Druid says:
    @christine

    The whole point is we’re not living in the third world, though that is changing with mentalities like yours. This kind of exploitation if accepted will lead to much worse exploitation such as in India, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Thailand, etc.

    • Replies: @christine
  72. Anon[230] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    The fundamental problem is that Jews are “a little too good” at talking themselves into bad ideas, and selling those bad ideas to other people. See communism for an example. There’s never been a genuine communist country that treated its own people well. Jews are so ideologically driven that they refuse to acknowledge the fact that power corrupts human nature, and when you give a government totalitarian power, they always start looking after their own personal interests and ignore those of their own people.

    Jews are never convinced that facts can slay a theory, when facts do that all the time. Jews live in a world of ideology and outside the world of practicality. If they could change their own car tires and do their own home repairs, they’d be smarter about life. Being forced to be practical makes you more in tune with reality. I swear, there’s a practical gene that has been left out of the Jewish makeup that makes them believe awfully stupid things that flunk a common-sense reality test.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  73. christine says:
    @Kali

    Where did i say condone sexual blackmail ?

    Read what i say as i am talking specifically about a sexual matter.

  74. christine says:
    @Colin Wright

    The only party doing the exploiting in this case are the ex teen whores trying to scam some more money out of wealthy and famous men long after the mutually agreed business transaction was completed.

  75. christine says:
    @renfro

    Ah, resorting to name calling and that gives me a good insight into the kind of person you are but be careful because when one points the finger three are always pointing back.

    So sorry to have bruised your exceptionally fragile ego/mind.

    • Replies: @renfro
  76. christine says:
    @Druid

    ‘Mentalities like yours’.

    That’s hilarious coming from someone who’s mind can’t workout that the only ones doing the exploiting here are the ex whore teens(of course not including any potential sexual blackmail cameras behind two way mirrors Mossad operation by Epstein on Lolita island).

    If the teens and Maxwell/Epstein both mutually agreed to their business transaction then where is the exploitation?

    Give me a break.

  77. christine says:
    @Colin Wright

    ‘It was their introduction to life as disposable people’.

    15 years old is hardly an introduction to life and please tell me how any prostitute will ever feel that she isn’t disposed of as I guess it goes with the territory(lol) but I guess all the $$$ the teen whores were paid by billionaire Epstein came in very handy for them to dispose of in the mall.

    Amazing how so many sympathise with these ex teen whore nasty exploiters of wealthy and famous men who were just doing on Lolita island what animals do..

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  78. @christine

    ‘Amazing how so many sympathise with these ex teen whore nasty exploiters of wealthy and famous men who were just doing on Lolita island what animals do..’

    I think that one aspect of all this is that it’s not a matter of there being any sharp divisions, but of there being a continuum…at one end is perfectly normal sex, while at the other end is raping a five year old.

    Epstein, Ehud Barak et al lie somewhere along this line — considerably closer to raping the five year old than I would go, but that it’s not right out at the end doesn’t make it all just fine. I can beat you up and rob you. That I didn’t kill you as well doesn’t make it all okay.

    So there are a variety of possible attitudes to take towards it all. One can emphasize the evil, or one can point out that the situation wasn’t as extreme as it could have been. CB Terry, for example, took a position I wouldn’t take — but it’s legitimate. It’s just not mine.

    You, on the other hand, definitely have issues. Calling these pathetically damaged and exploited children ‘ex teen whore nasty exploiters’ is strange.

  79. Kali says:

    @christine

    Your singular lack of insight, let alone empathy, toward those you reflexively label “ex teen whores”, and your inability to recognise that you yourself are “name calling” (notwithstanding those women are not here to defend themselves), whilst continually implying that their adult sexual exploiters are actually the victims of those “ex teen whores” mark you as:

    1. An apologist for the sexual exploitation of sexually and emotionally immature youngsters by perverted old men and women who, in a less perverted world, might make it their business to actually help, teach and guide those youngsters, as opposed to fucking them for money, in a world where acquisition of money is respected and rewarded above all other considerations.

    2. Incapable of analysing the sociological implications of growing up in an over-sexualised society in which overtly sexualised “teen idols” set the standard for the popularity contest which is modern and postmodern (they just keep getting younger) adolescents.

    3. An ignorant troll who really ought to spend a LOT more time reading and reflecting than writing.

    I could go on, but (providing you are actually capable of comprehending long sentences, which I doubt given that you seem to struggle with short ones) I hope you get the idea.

    Kali.

  80. Americans have figured it out…

    Not through competence but through one’s own ethnic networking.

  81. Cassandra says:
    @Polemos

    Just take the Greeks. Look what they gave to the world, and they didn’t even charge interest.

  82. Boldizar says:

    Bring it on Dersh. Maybe we can get Finkelstein to travel along and stomp his ass in every town he visits.

  83. renfro says:
    @christine

    Name calling is appropriate in your case.

    Let me guess….
    You are a male sex abuser yourself using a female name
    And you got’exploited’ by a whore you hired.
    Or your are a female pimp running a stable of teenage whores.
    Or you are a so ugly female that no one would pay you for sex so you hate the pretty whores who can get paid for sex.

    Whatever you are you aren’t acceptable in a civilized society.

    • Agree: Kali
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  84. Anonymous[145] • Disclaimer says:
    @renfro

    You are a male sex abuser yourself using a female name

    This, no doubt, and/or some low-rent Hasbara operative. Only they will dare to push this “13-year-old whore” narrative and expect the goyim to buy it.

  85. Tucker says:
    @Colin Wright

    “You see, I believe in the Holocaust myself.”

    Do you realize that by making a statement like this, you are revealing the fact that you have never bothered to dig into the facts or bothered to do a critical analysis of the existing “evidence” or engaged in an intelligent analysis of the “claims” made by the purveyors and financial profiteers of the Holocaust narrative of WW2?

    Because, had you done even a cursory examination of the official narrative – you would realize that there exists a significant number of claims that have been thoroughly debunked and proven to be bald faced lies. You are admitting that you are embarrassingly ignorant of the discredited claims about ‘shrunken heads’, or ‘lampshades made from jewish skin’, or ‘masturbation death machines’ or ‘soap made from jewish fat’. You are also admitting that you are unaware that the jewish overloads at the Nuremberg Trials committed atrocious acts of sadistic torture – crushing the testicles of the German officers – in order to compel them to sign confessions that were written for them by vindictive jews who were seeking revenge and who had no solid evidence that could be used to prop up the lies they were spinning about WW2?

    Well, allow me to recommend a homework assignment that will bring you up to speed on the events of WW2.

    https://worldtruth.video/watch/one-third-of-the-holocaust-full_YOrMTSVVCwjqWoi.html

    It will require 4 hours 15 minutes and 26 seconds of your time to complete this homework assignment, but I will promise you that it will be a worthy expenditure of your time.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Gilad Atzmon Comments via RSS