The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewFred Reed Archive
Blackness Fatigue: Enough Is Too Much
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
OpenAI Text Summary
The text presents a dire warning about the potential for racial and ethnic conflict in the United States, positing that the country is on a precarious edge due to a confluence of social, economic, and racial tensions. The author argues that while the idea of an organized "race war" may be exaggerated, the reality of disorganized violence is very plausible given the current climate. The author cites instances of unrest in various cities, suggesting that the lack of a broader uprising can be attributed to government pressure and a lack of racial identity among whites. However, he warns that should such an identity develop, it could lead to explosive consequences.

The author asserts that racial and ethnic conflicts are often irrational and driven by deep-seated emotions rather than logical grievances. He draws parallels between various global conflicts and the situation in the U.S., challenging the notion that diversity is inherently beneficial. Instead, he suggests that diversity can lead to violence and strife, as seen in historical conflicts across the world. The text emphasizes that the perceived advantages of diversity often mask the underlying tensions that can lead to violence, particularly in a country that is increasingly fractious along racial lines.

The author highlights the role of societal pressures beyond just race, including economic dislocation, growing inequality, and cultural divisions, all of which serve as accelerants for potential conflict. He argues that many individuals, particularly young white Americans, are disillusioned and angry, seeking an outlet for their frustrations. Simultaneously, he notes that many black Americans also feel marginalized and frustrated with their societal position. The text critiques the imposition of black cultural norms on white populations, suggesting that such actions may provoke backlash and further entrench divisions.

Finally, the author warns that the current trajectory of racial relations combined with escalating crime and a lack of accountability may lead to a tipping point. He emphasizes that the media's failure to report on racial tensions accurately and the tendency to downplay violent incidents can exacerbate misunderstandings and hostilities. The text concludes with an acknowledgment of the complexity of these issues, suggesting that potential solutions, such as promoting racial autonomy and voluntary segregation, are politically unfeasible. The author fears that without significant change, the cycle of violence and resentment will only deepen, leading to inevitable conflict.
OpenAI Outline Summary
# Outline of Potential Social Explosion in the U.S.

## I. Introduction
A. Concerns about a looming social explosion in the U.S.
B. Clarification of the term "race war"
C. Historical precedents of violence in specific cities (Ferguson, Portland, Baltimore)

## II. Understanding Racial and Ethnic Conflicts
A. The role of diversity in conflicts
1. Common misconception of diversity as a strength
2. Historical examples of ethnic conflicts (Catholics vs. Protestants, Sunnis vs. Shia, etc.)
B. Nature of racial and ethnic conflicts
1. Cruelty and irrationality of such conflicts
2. Examples of minor differences leading to major violence
C. The American perspective on racial tensions
1. Misinterpretation of black communities and grievances
2. Misplaced emphasis on positive stereotypes

## III. Social Tensions Beyond Race
A. Other underlying societal issues
1. Economic uncertainty and declining living standards
2. Growing inequality and debt issues
3. Cultural clashes between diverse American groups
B. The impact of these tensions on racial conflicts
1. Suppression of discussions regarding societal tensions
2. The potential for a broader uprising

## IV. Dynamics of Recent Protests and Riots
A. Characteristics of protesters
1. Bored youth with no prospects
2. Black communities' frustrations with societal conditions
B. The role of media in shaping narratives
1. Coverage of protests and racial issues
2. Perception of systemic racism as a primary cause

## V. Cultural Imposition and Backlash
A. The imposition of black cultural norms on whites
1. Changes in education and societal standards
2. Effects on white parents and their children’s education
B. Perception of threats to white cultural identity
1. Resistance to perceived degradation of traditional values
2. Fear of losing cultural and physical safety

## VI. Potential Flashpoints for Violence
A. The risk of violent confrontations
1. Possible incidents igniting widespread conflict
2. The unpredictability of race-related violence
B. Government responses to racial tensions
1. Fear of backlash leading to inaction
2. Consequences of leniency in law enforcement

## VII. Crime and Racial Dynamics
A. Crime statistics and racial implications
1. Disproportionate rates of crime among different racial groups
2. The media's selective coverage of racial violence
B. Public perception and societal consequences
1. White flight from urban areas
2. Growing frustration among the white population

## VIII. The Role of Media and Government
A. Media's role in shaping public perception
1. Avoidance of racial identifiers in crime reporting
2. Promotion of narratives that exacerbate racial tensions
B. Government policies and their impact
1. Erosion of law enforcement effectiveness
2. Policies perceived as appeasement towards racial groups

## IX. Psychological Underpinnings of Violence
A. Unpredictable nature of violent acts
1. Examples of extreme violence with little provocation
2. The psychology behind seemingly irrational actions
B. The societal impact of these violent incidents
1. Escalation of tensions and fears within communities

## X. Conclusion
A. The ongoing deterioration of social cohesion
B. Ineffectiveness of current political solutions
1. Need for more serious discussions on race and culture
2. Potential for voluntary segregation and localized governance as a solution
C. The uncertain future of race relations in America
1. Increasing frustrations and potential for conflict
2. The role of gun sales as a barometer of societal unrest

By understanding these various elements, we can begin to grasp the complexities surrounding race relations and the potential for social unrest in the United States. The article emphasizes the need for open discourse and acknowledgment of the underlying issues to avert a possible crisis.
List of Bookmarks

Methinks the US may very well be heading toward a social explosion. The phrase “race war “is overwrought if it implies organized units and chains of command. However, in a country awash in firearms, a bloody, disorganized, continent-wide eruption is possible. To think “it can’t happen here” is complacently inattentive. We have already seen it in temporal and geographic piecemeal in the Fergusons and Portlands and Baltimores, in the armed anarchy of the cities. Arguably a broader uprising has failed to happen only because of intense pressure from government and media, and because whites have not acquired a sense of racial identity. If they do, or when they do, Katie bar the door.

Both racial war, and its close cousin, ethnic war, result from contact between groups of different kinds—that is, diversity, which causes most of the world’s bloodshed. Americans seldom notice this. One reasons is that they are constantly told that diversity is a blissful state. But it isn’t. Consider: Catholics and Protestants in Ireland, Sunnis and Shia in many places, Jews and Moslems in Palestine, Hutus and Tutsis in Burundi, Hindus and Moslems in India and nearby, Tamils and Sinhalese in Sri Lanka, Chinese and Indonesians in Indonesia, French and Africans in Paris, and so on. The assertion that “diversity is our strength” seems an attempt to avoid realizing that it isn’t.

Racial and ethnic conflicts are cruel, often explosive, and irrational. They seldom make sense because the devastation and hideousness are disproportionate to the assigned causes. For example, the differences between Protestants and Catholics in Ireland are so slight as probably to be undetectable to you and me, yet the two fought murderously for years, blowing up pubs packed with member of the other faction. In the American case, nice and good-hearted people will point out that blacks are warm and friendly people if they like you, immensely talented in this and that, have legitimate grievances’ against society, and so on. All true. And irrelevant. Similar things can be said about both sides in most ethnic conflicts.

The prospect for bloodshed grows in the presence of other forms of social tension and is probably proportional to suppression of mention of the frictions. You can’t solve a problem if you don’t admit that it exists. The United States today is bent to the breaking point under many stresses other than racial. Severe economic uncertainty, declining standards of living, growing economic inequality, crushing debt loads to include student debt that hinders normal formation of families, hatred—not too strong a word—between Trump people and the coastal elites who rule the country, actual poverty in Appalachia, the Rust Belt, and the rural South, large and growing homeless populations, immigration, and the recent discovery that America consists of many cultures that do not like each other: New England, Alabama, West Virginia, Jews, Latinos, These constitute a poisonous accelerant that will detonate easily and intensify any conflict.

Note that most of the whites involved in the Floyd eruption were not greatly interested in blacks. They appeared to be bored young with no prospects and much free-floating anger looking for an outlet. The prolonged rioting in Portland involved fairly few blacks. Blacks themselves are furious over being at the bottom of society, also with no prospects, a condition they blame, with encouragement from the media, on racism. If this were the case, it would be easy to correct.

Then, ominously, the imposition of black cultural norms on whites. America is being utterly remade to conform to the desires of blacks, this being pushed by people most of whom do not like blacks. How many of them go to black ghettos to eat, or send their children to black urban schools? Rather the whites opposing “systemic racism” seethe with hostility to the deplorables, whom they detest. and want to shove blackness down their throats. In doing this they are threatening things dear to at least half of the white population: their culture, children, physical safety, and sense of propriety. This is not smart.

The danger is that a flashpoint will come, that for example BLM will mob the wrong house in the wrong state and the occupants will open fire, leaving a dozen dead. The entire country would explode. Nice well-intentioned whites would not be able to protest that they supported the fight against systemic racism. That is not how racial and ethnic wars work.

We are seeing a ferocious attack on the underpinnings of white European civilization , and for that matter of all actual civilizations. Japan, India, China, South Korea—none would buy into the enstupidation and degradation. Neither would Argentina or Mexico, which try to raise their cultural levels. Only America is on a downward path, in search of social justice.

Consider: Math curricula are being dumbed down because blacks do poorly at math, English grammar instruction eliminated because blacks can’t or won’t learn it, entrance exams for the elite and demanding high schools eliminated because blacks don’t pass them, SATs dropped because blacks score poorly on them, promotion exams in police departments eliminated because blacks don’t pass them. Entrance requirements at medical school are lowered because not enough blacks pass them, AP courses in high school eliminated because too few blacks get into them.

Dangerously, the government forbids white parents to have schools teaching what they regard as desirable material at what they regard as acceptable academic levels while requiring what they regard as civilized behavior. White parents are forced to see their children subjected to what they regard as obscene, semiliterate, violent, stupid, a culture dominated by what seems to them, (and would to any First World country) the opposite of cultivation. When parents whose daughter wants to go into electronic engineering see her forced into pseudo math taught by teachers who couldn’t recognize a partial derivative if it spoke to them in tongues, when she ought to be in AP calculus, they are not happy. But there is nothing they can do about it. Yet.

Imposing black intellectual standards on a country that sees itself in competition with disciplined, studious, bright, and exceedingly numerous Chinese engineers has obvious consequences that already make themselves felt. Much of the white population, aware of this, becomes angry and angrier.

The decline started perhaps when the Supreme Court disallowed the use of IQ tests by employers because blacks couldn’t pass them, and allowed affirmative action, racial discrimination against whites, because blacks couldn’t advance without it. This incapacity is the root of the racial problem. It cannot be solved, if it can be solved in any circumstances, in a politically chaotic and censored country that refuses to address it. Renaming buildings and toppling statutes will improve nothing while raising the level of anger among whites.

Not all of this degradation arises from the demands of blacks. The conversion of universities from scholarly enterprises into profit centers required the admission of huge cohorts of students neither intellectually or culturally suited to higher education. These, like blacks, have neither the interest nor capacity for genuine schooling. America’s characteristic anti-intellectualism and resentment of superiority plays a part. The argument for it is embodied in the semi-literate gibberish of education majors who themselves are unsuited for schooling. But blacks have provided the throw-weight for the promulgation of peasantry. Pampered white rabble have found that they can force elimination of virtually anything they don’t like by calling it racist.

The renaming of streets and buildings, the toppling of statues, the near worship of a negligible armed robber and semi-derelict, the renaming of military bases in narcissistic self-abnegation are winding a spring. It is dangerous that those angrily promoting the appeasement, the media, the talking heads in New York, do not see the advancing fury. These people, substantially congruent with the coastal elites, elected Trump by being contemptuous of Middle America and blandly unaware of the brewing storm. They are doing it again.

Yet it is black crime that is likely to provide the ignition. The figures are stark, undeniable, at the level of states, municipalities, FBI. These numbers are unknown in any other civilized country. It is perilous that black men rape white women at a high rate, while the reverse barely happens. Sexual transgression pushes primordial buttons that are not wise to push. At what seem shrinking intervals black mobs burn cities, loot and destroy stores., wreak havoc on neighborhoods, and go largely unopposed. Governments at all levels fear them, know that if they respond forcefully, the entire country will go up in flames. The police are cowed and neutered, so crime rises sharply. Whites, intimidated—intimidated so far—flee. Many cities are now only formally part of the United States. The black mobs do as they please without consequence.

The appeasement of blacks, fear that they might riot, runs through society. Increasingly jurisdiction simply give up on enforcing the law. Cities like Chicago and New York have abolished cash bail to that criminals immediately go free, and immediately often offend again. Baltimore and Chicago no longer prosecute minor offenses such as prostitution and urinating in public. San Francisco has made shoplifting of goods worth less than $950 a misdemeanor, the shoplifters not being Asians, with the result that to this date seventeen Walgreens have closed (video). Cities stop prosecuting the jumping of subway turnstiles as this is done only by blacks and Hispanics. The latter won’t riot. The former will, and governments know it. When blacks very often racially attack whites, the media suppress the story. There are many, many of these attacks, covered briefly in local media but ignored by the majors, caught on video that circulates widely online.

Herein lies a great peril. Blacks are accustomed to getting anything they want and growing confident, expect whites forever to back away. Perhaps, living in concentrated ghettos, not reading, poorly educated, they do not realize the certain outcome of an actual war. They are fed by white farmers from afar, heavily outnumbered, with electricity dependent on fuel supplies from sources run by whites.

Twenty-four Black on White Homicides in a Month. Read it. This goes on all the time. Over and over.

The racial attacks on whites and Asians share an unsettling explosiveness, an apparent lack of impulse control or awareness of consequences. A black shoots a store clerk for telling him to pull up his mask. Or black man stabs 96-year-old Asian woman. A black man shoots a white woman because she cut him off in traffic. Black man throws white five-year-old off third-floor balcony. Black man stabs four-year-old to death. Black man shoots white five-year-old in head.

The psychology here is strange. Shooting a child with no provocation in front of witnesses, or throwing one off a balcony in front of witnesses, or shooting a clerk for saying “Please pull up your mask,” all certain to lead to life in prison or close to it, is baffling.

Government and the media hide what is going on. In crime stories they increasingly do not publish the race or photo of perpetrators. This, they say, would perpetuate stereotypes, as indeed it would. Stereotypes are the aggregate observations of many people over time and are almost always accurate. But there is another, and worse, pattern. For example, when a black was shot in Ferguson, black witnesses lied, saying that he had his hands up and said, “Don’t shoot!” The media bought this and propagated it. They invariably go for the bad-white-innocent-blacks narrative and ghetto blacks, who don’t, and often cannot read, believe it and understandably become enraged. An uprising follows.

In particular the media do not make public the very real hatred of blacks for whites. Exceptions and degrees, yes, but the centerline is a powerful hostility. If you doubt this, and the brewing reaction, watch this video by Jared Taylor, one of many white advocates never seen in the media. About the video, two points: First, the examples of black hatred are documented, verifiable, and many. Second, whatever you may think of him, he is an example of what a great many quietly say—quietly because you can lose your job for saying the wrong thing.

Video Link

What the country is doing hasn’t worked, isn’t working, and shows no sign of working. Things get worse by the month. With Biden, Harris, Pelosi, and so on apparently doing everything they can to infuriate the other half of the country—gun control, open borders, erasing the South, anti-white indoctrination in the schools, promotion of sexual curiosities, on and on, anger will grow. As the man associated with Finland Station asked, “What is to be done?”

Unfortunately nothing can be done. Anything that might work is politically impossible, and anything that is politically possible won’t work. Cosmetics, moral preening, lowering of standards, party politics—none of these will fix the country. In calmer times, saner heads might prevail. Partial alleviation might be achieved by allowing, or encouraging, voluntary segregation, taking white police out of black neighborhoods, letting black neighborhoods decide what laws to enforce within their own boundaries, letting the races decide for themselves what to teach their children, and to the extent possible allowing racial autonomy. Instead, the elites will double down on what isn’t working and nothing will get better, except the monthly sales at gun shops.

 
All Comments Hidden • Show  831 Comments • Reply
Personal Classics
Not What Tom Jefferson Had in Mind
Sounds Like A Low-Ranked American University To Me
Very Long, Will Bore Hell Out Of Most People, But I Felt Like Doing It
It's Not A Job. It's An Adventure.
Cloudy, With Possible Tidal Wave