This is what whites must do.

They must insist on Jews being listed as a separate category when it comes to the issue of Affirmative Action.

If white Hispanics can count as ‘people of color’, then Jews should count as a different group too.

This is necessary because Jews, far more than white gentiles, are vastly over-represented and over-privileged in top positions in institutions and industries.

What I find most hilarious is Jews demanding that they not be conflated with ‘white privilege’.

It should be whites who should be demanding that they not be conflated with Jewish privilege, the biggest privilege in the entire world.

Jews put on this ‘noble act’ as the caretakers of the less privileged ‘people of color’ by offering them Affirmative Action.

But Jews make white gentiles pay the price for more ‘inclusion’ of non-whites. Jews themselves continue to be vastly over-represented in elite positions without any challenge from other groups.

From Wikipedia:

***

The 2010 US Census included changes designed to more clearly distinguish Hispanic ethnicity as not being a race. That included adding the sentence: “For this census, Hispanic origins are not races.”[19][20] Additionally, the Hispanic terms were modified from “Hispanic or Latino” to “Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin”.[19][20]

***

Being of the “[W]hite” race (i.e., solely of indigenous-European, -North African and/or -Middle Eastern extraction) is irrelevant to the Federal government’s lone ethnic distinction, which is noted above. White people from Brazil, or from Portugal itself, are not considered “Hispanic” (although dictionary definitions vary, some including Brazilians, but not Portuguese, and others including neither Brazilians nor Iberians, whether from Portugal or Spain), but they still are in the same ethnic category, as far as the government is concerned, because they are nonetheless “Latinos”– the same as if they were “Hispanics” (of whatever race[s]). An emigrant from Lisbon becomes an “oppressed person of color” the moment he immigrates to the United States– entitled to the very same “minority” benefits, set-asides and preferences as any wholly Black descendent of ante bellum slaves in Dixie! Although the CIA considers Argentina to be circa 97% “[W]hite” by race, the entire lot of them likewise would transmogrify into “oppressed people of color” if they were air-lifted, en masse, to reside in the United States. “It’s a strange, strange world we live in, Master Jacque!”

I propose a scientific form of affirmative action

How about a scientific form of equal opportunity?

“Although the CIA considers Argentina to be circa 97% “[W]hite” by race, the entire lot of them likewise would transmogrify into “oppressed people of color” if they were air-lifted, en masse, to reside in the United States.”

It is common for poor, oppressed Hispanic peoples like this to be robbed of their whiteness and their dignity. There is a simple solution, however: just commit a crime. Then they can be counted as white again.

Is this article a cabernet or a chardonnay?

An emigrant from Lisbon becomes an “oppressed person of color” the moment he immigrates to the United States

I went to school with a girl from Spain (born and raised until some time in High School). She was, of course, very active in La Raza and other organizations focused on eradicating the oppression of ‘her people.’

I am actually surprised more Spaniards don’t take advantage of this loophole, what with their awful economy at the moment.

But let’s remember when even the slightest bit tempted to go on about Jews getting together to run the world that the Jewish culture has had one thing about it which is consistent from the Ancient Hebrews through to 2015: they tend to be argumentative and disputatious well beyond the habits of people not so devoted to the word made precise and weighty by writing. And of course they do it well, at least better on average than non-Jews.

Therefore it is Ron Unz whom one immediately thinks of as demonstrating the overrepresentation of Jews in the Ivies in that brilliant article “The Myth of American Meritocracy”.

I don’t favour ethnically, let alone religiously exclusive states or one where there are privileged classes of any kind. I wouldn’t have minded being able to claim that I had a distinguished diplomat ancestor who had advanced cogent arguments against the Balfour Declaration. But as it is I regard what Israelis do well as a big offset in gifts to the world for the damage done to peace in the world by Israel’s mere existence amidst a host of enemies.

In my experience (and of course by my standards and according to my taste) the assimilated educated Jew tends to be the best kind of upper middle class person in post Enlightenment Europe, and I suppose America, the best of English gentlemen for example. Admittedly I have a crazy prejudice in favour of good brains vigorously used and have never experienced the gall or envy from suffering in competition with clever Jews.

Those who struggle with the knowledge that they can’t compete with Jews and try to sublimate their envy and humiliation by concocting conspiracies and frauds should try thinking how fortunate we Anglophones have been. Protected by the sea and relatively high on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs the upper middle classes of England and Scotland had by 1800 edged civilisation just a little ahead (by most 2015 contemporary standards) of those coming to terms with Enlightenment thinking in other countries where tyrannous rulers or revolutionary zealots were retarding what might otherwise have been more widespread, especially in Germany. Under the influence of evangelicals the slave trade was abolished in 1807, factory acts were past to protect exploited labour and, inter alia, attempts were even made to do the right thing by Australian Aboriginal people who, admittedly didn’t present the danger to farming landgrabbing whites that the Native Americans did. This is said not to assert the truth of every contestable detail but to provide a background to my observation that clever Jews were not unlike the clever Irish in becoming the best examples of the leading civilisation in an always imperfect world. The comparison is worth considering because the Irish Catholics were just as much outsiders (and not even suspected of being clever) in the WASP world but cleaved well to the best model available.

I remember being struck 50 and more years ago by the devotion to English law and traditions of Catholic judges who had often been one of many children who came up a quite hard way and were still having families of 8 or more children so still identifiably Catholic Irish-Australian. And no one can be better relied on to use common law and its traditions to defend the interests of the underdog than Jewish lawyers in my experience. (And yes I would look to their kin to give me the best protection from onerous taxes too. Brains do have advantages on most battlefields…).

The US Census is bogus but its legality is dubious at best! It relies on pre 1900s version of colour and race to make laws, which are at odds with reality. In the non US world, Latin people are those who speak a Latin language (Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, etc) while USA only considers Spanish as the only group that is ‘authorized’ to be in said category.