One has subscribe(give money) to the commie rag NYT to be able to read the article in full. Not going to happen.

Many blacks and Hispanics draw strong parallels between the discrimination they have suffered at home and the plight of Palestinians.

Blame whitey, in both cases. Always wronged, never wrong.

land that was more than 95 percent Arab at the dawn of Zionism…

Sounds like there was a nakba long before the Nakba. The Crusades were fought– rightly– for a reason.

Note that in this wordy, seemingly endless article, the word Christian appears only once. It referred to sites, not to people.

Particularly while racism and ethnic cleansing against the indigenous Palestinian people by Zionists escalates, people must condemn such practices.

For the B.D.S. movement, ending the occupation of the Palestinian territories is necessary but far from sufficient. It would leave the smaller group, Jews, with 78 percent of the total land.

The author is suffering from a lack of historical knowledge. Let me help with a refresher.

Here is a map of Palestine:
—

Palestine (a.k.a. The Palestinian Mandate) was divided into:
– Muslim Palestine — 77% of the land
– Jewish Palestine — 23% of the land
Muslim Palestine is more commonly known as TransJordan or Jordan, just as Jewish Palestine is now known as Israel.

At most, Jews will have only the 23% of Palestinian land that is Jewish Palestine, not the 78% the author claims.

Why is 77%+ of Palestinian land not enough for Islam? Why must Islam occupy Judea and Sumaria, thus shrinking the 23% of the land that is Jewish Palestine?

A much better solution for a lasting peace would help Muslims Return to the 77% of Palestine that is Muslim Palestine. Funding the infrastructure build and compensation to move would be expensive, however ending the ongoing “permanent refugee” crisis seems worth it.

Israel is running America into the ground, wrecking Europe and trying to start a war with Russia. America needs to cut all aid and get away from the nasty little cancer before they finish the Job and start WW3!

Just take a look at what this nonsense has done to the British Labour party.

Former Mayor of London: It’s not antisemitic to hate Jews of Israel
Ken Livingston made his comments during a speech he gave last week to the Labour Against the Witch-hunt organization, which denies claims that the Labour party has been beset by antisemitism.

https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Antisemitism/Former-Mayor-of-London-Its-not-antisemitic-to-hate-Jews-of-Israel-585329

Do you seriously not understand that the Palestinain Mandate and Palestine are two completely separate things?

Palestine was a country and the Palestinian Mandate was a legal document.

Palestine and Transjordan were separate countries – both were administered under the authority of the Palestinian Mandate.

Please stop posting utter nonsense.

Palestinain Mandate and Palestine are historically 2 completely separate entities.
But Jews have a knack of conflating and presenting the mess as the reality that you and me have to respect. No, we don’t.
Long time ago Israel started giving biblical names to certain areas of Palestine to make it appealing to the ignoramus leaders among the Bible thumping Western crowd of 1900 . It was planted as religious historical archeological realities with deeply emotional arc that bound lefties conservatives religion secular educated uneducated ,local fellow international citizen and spliced together vast segmented stratified minds of western society to one theme – positive view about Jew and Zionism-on the sly . It succeeded . But that success is an abomination .It is travesty, it is moral and intellectual and ethical failures of western education and politics. it is a dereliction of academic responsibility .

Now the tide is against the presence of intellectual dishonesty . BDS is part of that , so is the truth being forced on Democrats voters . Chasm is widening with raw edges . Conservatives still cling to the old charade at a cost . It hurts them BY allowing continued presence of the disastrous Zionist views on each and every aspect of their lives, they lose- religion,economy,society , and values. . It robs them a safe a prosperous future .

Why should we allow Jews to have one acre of land when their entire religion is predicated on dispossessing every other nation of theirs (and worse)?

When the larger picture is accounted for, your spin is less than meaningless.

Even by Hasbara standards this is utterly mendacious.

What is labeled “Jewish Palestine in this map is actually the Palestinian Mandate. This mandate was part of the illicit spoils of war, which the British and French colonial powers grabbed for themselves at the conclusion of WW I. This division of spoils was condemned even at the time. Some part of the British spoils was supposed to be set aside for Jewish settlements according to the Balfour declaration. (Sort of an unearned Jewish spoils of war within the British spoils.)

The Balfour Declaration was essentially written by Zionists, who promised support for Britain’s WW I aims if Britain made it official policy. It reads as follows:

“His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. ”

Leaving aside the absurdity of the notion that Great Britain had the right to dictate the apportionment of a large area of land which was part of another empire – the Ottoman Empire -, usurp the most basic rights of that land’s occupants, and unilaterally decide the fate of its peoples, there are several things worth noting about this declaration, which is in some sense the ultimate legal justification for Israel’s current existence:

(1) It specifically mentions the establishment in the Palestinian Mandate – not the entire Mandate nor even necessarily a contiguous portion of it – of a “national home” for the Jewish people, not a Jewish ethno-state.

(2) It very specifically prohibits prejudicing “the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine”.

So even by the shady standards of the Balfour Declaration the current ethno-state of Israel is illegitimate and an illegal, immoral and essentially genocidal violation of the most basic rights of the original inhabitants.

What makes all this even more ironic is some genetic history. The Ashkenaz Jews who created Zionist ideology and today’s fascist ethno-state of Israel have only a tenuous historical link to Palestine. They are descended from Jewish males who left Judea two millennia ago, migrated to Europe, and procreated through marriage to European women in Italy. Somewhat later descendants of these hybrid Jews moved north of the Alps and diluted their Palestinian links further with more intermarriage with a new set of local women.

Meanwhile, many of the Jewish brethren of these Jewish emigrants remained in Palestine, dropped their defunct Temple cult, rejected the Talmudic system that replaced it, and became Christians. Through the viccissitudes of history they changed religious allegiances at least once more. But they stayed in Palestine as autochthonous descendants of the original Jewish inhabitants.

So ultimately the Zionist enterprise and its product, Israel, are the result of a colonial oppression replacing direct descendants of the original Jewish inhabitants of Judea and Palestine with Europeans having only weak genetic ties with Palestine, ties strained and etiolated by two millennia of voluntary absence.

You ever hear a word of support by BDSers for the Serbs expelled from Kosovo, the Greeks from northern Cyprus, the Christians from East Timor, or indeed the Tibetens and Muslims oppression in Western China?

Me neither.

Arabs are those whose tongue is Arabic – ie linguistically Arabized. And the Crusades were not right. The Europeans banished the indigenous people out from Jerusalem – that included the first Christians. The amount of ignorance you have is astounding. The original Christians didnt count to the Crusaders (as they dont count now to the latest occupiers of Palestine).

They no longer let you sneak in incognito. Oh well you don’t have to read it. You can tell what is in it just by reading the reactions. For example:

Author of NYT Anti-Israel Piece Works for Group Funded by Qatar

https://freebeacon.com/culture/author-nyt-anti-israel-piece-works-group-funded-qatar/

This might be an example of an ad hominem argument for your students!

Let’s see …

* Tu quoque directed at Muslims: check.
* Nakba derision: check.
* Pretense of white/Christian victimhood: check.
* Agreement by renowned zionazi troll: check.

Nice try, Shlomo, but your act is becoming more transparent by the day.

The Daily Mail originally reported that Livingstone said during his speech that “‘It’s not antisemitic to hate the Jews of Israel,” but the comment was taken out of context, and Livingstone was in fact quoting what he had been accused of saying.

Meh.

Business as usual.

The article is fairly solid, replete with important facts. Thrall should have avoided describing Monticello as a “slave plantation,” a phrase too loaded for an otherwise good piece.

But I’m not hip to Sanders as the new savior of Palestinians, particularly since he has a track record of waffling and toeing similar lines to establishment candidates.

>One has subscribe(give money) to the commie rag NYT to be able to read the article in full.

?

Not a subscriber and I read the whole thing without a hitch.

“Particularly when anti-Semitism is rising throughout the world, Democrats must condemn efforts to isolate and delegitimize Israel.”

Israel was never legitimate:

It was founded by organized criminals and terrorists.

It is based upon two big lies (with many tributaries):

The first is the 6 million myth.

The second is that modern day Jewry traces its heritage from Abraham and the Old Testament.

Never mind that even if these lies were truths, this would not justify the land theft and terror engaged in by these ethnocentric and psychopathic trespassers. Their reliance upon historical falsehoods merely magnifies their crimes .

After I thought about it I used one of my three monthly free tokens at NYTimes to load the article. (It has been well over a year since I tried to load a page and they told me I had used up all my free access for the month.) I tried to load the page onto webarchive but that was not possible. Webarchive said they could not find the url. Anyway, some more fair use highlights from the article:

In the final platform, the Clinton team prevailed. The text made no mention of settlements, excluded the word “occupation,” referred to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel alone and opposed “any effort to delegitimize Israel, including at the United Nations or through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.”

(The Sanders people on the committee fought this.)

Many blacks and Hispanics draw strong parallels between the discrimination they have suffered at home and the plight of Palestinians. As the Democratic Party is pulled toward a more progressive base and a future when a majority of the party will most likely be people of color, tensions over Israel have erupted.

Yet year after year, Congress, citing “shared values” and Israel’s strategic importance, among other things, votes to give military aid to Israel, which is currently $3.8 billion per year: $500 million in missile defense and $3.3 billion in foreign military financing, more military financing than the United States provides to the rest of the world combined.

the Democratic Socialists of America has endorsed B.D.S. Kate Gould, a lobbyist for the Friends Committee on National Legislation, a Quaker group dedicated to peace, justice and environmental stewardship, told me that generally even progressive members of Congress frame development aid for the Palestinians merely as help for people who are suffering. There is rarely any acknowledgment, she says, “that they are suffering because we are funding their oppression. Hello! You do know that we are funding the occupation?”

There’s more but those are the high lights!

Have the serbs corrupted the US political system and cost trillions of dollars in wars?

You don’t explain why the Arab erasure of everyone who came before them was legitimate, do you?

Jews may have invented genocide, but Arabs get credit for coming up with ethnic cleansing.

* Tu quoque directed at Muslims: check.

If you’re so good at Latin, why the PC spelling? That’s what SPLC uses. You probably believe in their mythical “Islamophobia”, too.

* Pretense of white/Christian victimhood: check.

I refer you to Copts and Chaldeans.

If you do a little research you will find that Chaim Wiezmann never considered the trans Jordan to be part of the Zionist colonization enterprise.

Nobody is permitted to notice that the statement for which Livingstone was originally pilloried, was a bit closer to literal truth than the average Holocaust memoir.

Livingstone has been consistently, deliberately misquoted as having said that Hitler “supported Zionism“, or that Hitler “was [a] Zionist“.

As usual, it’s that whole schtick of taking a statement, paraphrasing it in a way that sounds extreme, and then excoriating the person being paraphrased as if they actually said the extreme version.

What Livingstone actually said was that Hitler “was supporting Zionism” in the sense that the German government had policies that specifically advanced Zionist interests.

As Jonathan Cook quipped, it’s often said that lending money to a drug addict is effectively “supporting” the continuation of his addiction: that doesn’t mean that your objective is that his addiction continues.

Hitler’s government was “in complete agreement” with Zionism – even the staunchly anti-Semitic SS…

“The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on religion leads the German government to guarantee without reservation the racial separateness of this community. The government finds itself in complete agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry, the so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry around the world and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis, Germany undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the future in the handling of the Jewish problem around the world.” (bold emphasis mine)

from Das Schwarze Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. quoted in Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (1985), pp. 56-57

For those playing at home:

• Das Schwarze Korps was the official newspaper of the SS.
• Frank Nicosia is a Professor of Holocaust Studies.

Other ‘tendency evidence” includes
• a coin struck to commemorate a 6-month visit by von Mildenstein and an official from the Zionist Federation to Palestine: swastika on one side, Star of David on the other;
• a 12-part series in Der Angriff detailing what von Mildenstein saw during his visit – all of it enthusiastic about the “Zionist project”;
• the Nuremberg Laws specifically granted the right to fly the blue & white Zionist flag and to give those flying it the protection of the State;
• the Zionist Federation was not outlawed – in fact their weekly newspaper was available for sale at newsstands.

On the Zionist flag: here’s the report from the JTA (Jan 2 1936) –

The Nazi authorities today decreed that the Zionist blue-white banner is the official Jewish flag and may be displayed under protection of the police throughout Germany.

The decree is based on the flag law passed by the Reichstag at the Nuremberg session at which the anti-Jewish legislation was adopted. Jews are expressly forbidden by this law to display the German flag.

“It is up to the Jewish nation,” the decree states, “to decide for itself which are to be the colors of the Jewish national flag, but until then the Zionists’ blue-white flag, together with the symbols of all the different Zionist groups, is valid in the Reich as the Jewish flag and as such will be enjoying State protection.”

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency: may or may not be trustworthy as a source generally, but in 1936 they were prepared to acknowledge that the Zionist banner had protected status under Nazi law – which most modern readers would find remarkable.

And people forget the that “Juden Raus!” was not generally a standalone phrase: the full form was “Juden Raus! Auf Nach Palästina!” (see “Arthur Ruppin and the Production of Pre-Israeli Culture” by Etan Bloom (2011), p335)

Also not a Times subscriber and was able to read without issue. In fact, I never have issues with the Times’ paywall. The Journal’s, unfortunately, has recently become impossible for me to evade.

Thanks to the UR for highlighting this article. I’m rather ignorant on the underlying issues and so I found it informative. Seems like a big risk for the Democratic Party, as it continues to get pulled further left by increasingly progressive wing.

They let me read it all. (It was long, and wow, really covered the territory!) This must not be your first visit to the “commie rag NYT ” if you’ve used up your free quota.

Have the serbs corrupted the US political system and cost trillions of dollars in wars?

I think you mean Croats. Or Kosovars. Or something. Serbs are playing the Palestinian role here.

You ever hear a word of support by BDSers for the Serbs expelled from Kosovo, the Greeks from northern Cyprus, the Christians from East Timor, or indeed the Tibetens and Muslims oppression in Western China?

That’s because they weren’t exposed to the anti-Kosovo virus–just the anti-Zionism virus. They were on their way to work one morning when someone came up from behind and clubbed them over the head with a bag of anti-Zionism virus. When they came to, they were shocked to discover they were suddenly opposed to slaughtering Muslims on behalf of Jews and other gut-wrenching examples of anti-Semitism.

And I dot want to hear . America doesn’t subsidize those expulsion . Again I don’t want to hear . US doesn’t go out on an injured limb to support and maintain the expulsion . Do you get it?

Let cops speak Let Chaldeans speak up for themselves. I don’t hear about expulsion from them Do you ?

Do you hear about being 2 nd or 3 rd class citizen in there own countries ?

” the Zionist banner had protected status under Nazi law ”

A courtesy not extended to the Nazi banner under Jewish law in Germany today.

Yup.

Great comment .

Here’s a quotation from that article: “I asked [Morton A.] Klein [the president of the Zionist Organization of America] why he believed it was “utterly racist and despicable,” as he put it, for [Richard] Spencer to promote a state for only one ethnic group but not racist for Israel to do so. “Israel is a unique situation,” he said. “This is really a Jewish state given to us by God.” He added, “God did not create a state for white people or for black people.”

It’s about time whites realized that Jews are treating white like Palestinians.

Immigration destroyed Palestinians and New World natives. It is destroying the white family of nations and white-founded nations.

Anyway, Israel is a big issue because too many whites support Zionism even though Jewish fate for whites is none other than White Nakba.

Whites need to demand national liberation from Jewish Imperialism. If whites free themselves of Jewish supremacism, it will better for Palestinians and Muslims who suffered wars for Israel.

But then, the problem is non-whites support Jewish imperialism in their own way because they want invasive entry into white nations, something that is mainly facilitated by Jewish globo-imperialism.

Do you hear about being 2 nd or 3 rd class citizen in there own countries ?

No, because they’re Christian, and the world media ignore them. But when you’re forced to vote for a monster like Saddam or Assad because your neighbors can’t be trusted with democracy, it must be pretty bad.

Observe your standard jew fork tongue in action. After he comments how Israel can do ethnic cleansing because others do it, he will comment how Israel is the only democracy in the middle east and is a shining example of human rights. Then he will be off to preach to Christians about those ridiculous “judeo-Christian” values, followed by how Tel Aviv is the gay capital of the world.

jews are truly vile.

…the original inhabitants

The original inhabitants did not speak Arabic.

For the B.D.S. movement, ending the occupation of the Palestinian territories is necessary but far from sufficient. It would leave the smaller group, Jews, with 78 percent of the total land

No it wouldn’t. It would leave them with 0% of the land. That’s the whole point.

Which means seven million people will be coming here.

Yes, I have. Many of the people who support BDS were sympathetic to the Serbs when they were being bombed by NATO, the East Timorese and the Tibetans. Those were all trendy causes among the anti-imperialist left a few years ago.

Lot is pulling a variation of the “no one can criticize my tribe until every other bad actor has been criticized first” canard.

said:

” Frank Nicosia is a Professor of Holocaust Studies.”

You really the bone tossing witch doctor of the “holocaust” religion

http://www.codoh.com

Your reasoning is based on a fake map which was published in 2005 by the active zionist Eli.E. Hertz
Below the real map of Palestine back in the early 20th century and how it evolved up til now . it shows how the zionist cancer has eaten up the holy land.

#winning !!!

“jews are truly vile.”

Why did God choose us then?

They helped start WW1 and 2. Why not 3?

“jews are truly vile.”

Why did God choose us then?

the question is Why do you claim “God” chose you?

Is it because you’re racist supremacists?

said:
” followed by how Tel Aviv is the gay capital of the world.”

Here you go:

Jews more than twice as likely to be gay, lesbian: http://akinokure.blogspot.com.au/2012/07/jews-more-than-twice-as-likely-to-be.html

Yeah, a lot more.

For now !!!

You mistake psychopathy with being chosen by some supernatural entity.

International Jewry is insatiable in its ethnocentric narcissism and in its insistence upon placing unendurable and manifestly unjust burdens upon the rest of humanity.

It insists upon giving “the fight against antisemitism” absolute priority in the new moral canon of globalism, as if antisemitism were some kind of irrational hatred based upon envy or ignorance, when in fact it is a rational, morally healthy response to the age old criminal behavior of the Jewish collective.

It demands the absolute and unqualified right to claim victim status and puts a trademark upon taking offense at even the slightest perception of gentile animosity towards the Zionist and Talmudic psychopathy and criminality. In other words, it is virtually a crime to even take notice of wrongdoing done by Jews – provided such activity is not directed at other and more prominent Jews. One example of this is the founding of the ADL in response to a Jewish child murderer and rapist having justice served to him for a crime he committed against a non-Jewish girl. In the mind of organized Jewry, this is considered persecution.

It rejects the overwhelming evidence that Jews were largely responsible for bringing to power the greatest, most murderous and repressive regime in European history, and were disproportionately represented in the councils of its government.

In its chronically litigious and whining fashion- its demand to claim eternal victim status while simultaneously usurping the mantle of unique genius and conquering hero, it prepares to bring down upon itself the avalanche of the people’s resentment and their truly righteous indignation.

>Why did God choose us then?

He chose you to fulfill a promise, one that requires you abide by the stipulations set forth in The Book, the violation of which effectively nullifies the blessings you would otherwise receive were you to uphold your end of the covenant in good faith.

According to your prophecies, the Levites anticipated three figures during the lifetime of Jesus: Elijah, the Messiah and “that Prophet.” They are separate and distinct individuals, the latter of the three also referred to as “Shiloh,” or the “Messenger of the Covenant,” “that Prophet” who, unlike all previous prophets, would herald a kingdom of God for all of humankind, not just the Children of Israel. Covetous of the favor they had received from God and unwilling to relinquish their authority as the chosen representatives of His Word, your ancestors abridged the account of Scripture, attempting to merge the identity of the last two prophets (Messiah and Shiloh) into one, that they could “keep it in the family.” Of course, when Jesus came, he would have none of it, which is why he refers to your Scribes and Pharisees as wicked men.

Jesus is the Messiah you never accepted, the one who brought the good news of Shiloh whose identity your ancestors sought to conceal. You were chosen to accept both Jesus and the Messenger of the Covenant, both of whom you continue to reject, thereby earning the wrath of God, which He promised you would earn for such corruption.

Your being “chosen” is a responsibility, not a privilege.

>You don’t explain why the Arab erasure of everyone who came before them was legitimate, do you?

Well, Arab Christians didn’t exactly “erase” the Romans, who really had no business occupying Arab lands to begin with. Quite a few of them preferred to see Romans beat back to where they came from. And Arabs also didn’t “erase” Berbers, whether in North Africa or Spain. Similarly, Turks weren’t “erased,” nor Indians, Indonesians or Malaysians.

Persians are also still alive and well, much to the chagrin of your fellow rabbis.

>If you’re so good at Latin, why the PC spelling?

Golly, gee, Reg … [blushing] I’m not that good at Latin.

My spelling of “Muslim” is standard modern English and better reflective of the Arabic from which it is derived. “Moslem” is the phonetic equivalent of “oppressed” in Arabic, and using it would simply lend credence to those P.C. allegations of “Islamophobia” which you so blithely reject, so you should really stick with the former orthography, lest you unwittingly aid the agenda of the SPLC.

>Chaldeans

Interesting hypothesis.

Are you postulating that Muslims “erased” Chaldeans? ‘Cause that would necessitate some serious time-travel, seeing as how they were absorbed among Babylonians some five centuries before Jesus.

Excuse me? Why should the native Palestinian Population of the Lands of Palestine lying to the west of the River Jordan and Dead Sea who have lived on these Lands for thousands of years, regardless whether they be Christian or Muslim or Jew have to move or be expurgated from their ancestral lands that are their home, their heritage, their life? Why is it deemed necessary by the forces of Zionism that all or any Palestinians who are not of Jewish Faith must be expelled? or caged in Gaza? or overrun on the West Bank by “settlers” coming from Eastern Europe, Ukraine and Russia whose only relationship to world Jewry appears to be the fact they fled from their ancestral homelands following the fall of communism seeking sunnier climes within which to live whilst some, specifically Orthodox, did also, and rightfully fear a rise in antisemitism from their neighbors between the east Bank of the Elbe and the Urals.
The slavering support for Israeli Governments throughout the past 25 years and idiotic support for a 2-State Solution in circumstances where that very same Israeli Government has, again and again, engaged in dishonesty and obfuscation, making the 2-State Solution impossible while engaging in confiscation of Palestinian Lands on the West Bank and facilitating construction of homes, roadways, schools, synagogues and business(s) leads me to the belief that the only solution is a unitary State incorporating both West Bank and Gaza and replacing the existing State of Israel with Freedom of Religion and of Expression guaranteed to all in a State where NO religion is placed on a higher plain than any other and the wholly fascist Nation-State law of 18th July 2018 is dumped where it should forever lie, in the dustbin of history.

hasbara troll! at it again!

That was satan talking to your talmudists! You mistook the voice for god’s

. . . widespread criticism of Omar for wittingly or unwittingly deploying anti-Semitic tropes

Maybe we should split the difference and say that Omar is half-witted.

A two-thirds majority was needed to approve the language. When the D.N.C.’s chairman, Antonio Villaraigosa, called the vote, it seemed that as many people in the auditorium yelled “no” as “aye,” forcing him to call a second vote and a third, each producing the same result. Villaraigosa then declared: “In the opinion of the chair, two-thirds have voted in the affirmative, the motion is adopted and the platform has been amended.” Delegates on the floor erupted in boos.

Simple solution for next time:

Video Link

For the NYT, this is a pretty even-handed look at the American political dynamics of support for Israel. It’s a long article, but if you are looking for the one money-quote that sums it all up, I’d say this is it:

What worries establishment Democrats, the former official added, is that the partisan divide over Israel will concretize — with Republicans defined as pro-Israel, Democrats defined as anti-Israel — and that the party coffers will empty.

They spoke Aramaic and Greek. Arabic and Aramaic are close cousins while Greek had been the language of Administration since Alexander the Great. But the local population, which was Monophysite Christian abandoned the Byzantines and joined the Arabs because they had more affinity with them than with the Byzantines and thought Islam was just another form of Christianity closer to them than Byzantine Christianity, which in an attempt to keep them back offered a compromise called the Ekthesis, which created the Maronites of today.

Excuse me?

Why should Violent Islam that invaded (~600 AD) the Lands of Palestine lying to the west of the River Jordan and Dead Sea have the right to keep their conquests made by forced conversion, enslavement, persecution, and execution.

Why is it deemed necessary by the forces of Violent Islam that all or any Palestinians who are not of Muslim Faith may never return to land they were expelled from?

Why must Violent Islam occupy the Temple Mount, the holiest site of the Jewish religion?

Violent Islam does have the “Right to Return” home, whether that is East Bank Muslim Palestine… Or, further West such as Mecca or Qom. Indeed it is more than a right, it is a “Duty to Return” as an end to the Violent Muslim occupation of Jewish and Christian lands.

None of you Semitic assholes should have access to those lands. You are such corrupt liars and genocidal supremacists that you can’t be trusted to claim rightful ownership or sincere intention in any aspect of geopolitics nor history. You should be marginalized and re-educated out of your mass psychosis that you maintain a death grip on since antiquity, which has been keeping the rest of the West hostage. We should no sooner allow those lands to any of you then we should the inmates of our worst asylum. Your books admit that you claimed them by means of invasion and genocide of people who you later identified as European (the Seven Canaanite Nations and Esau). People who your books still slate for eventual total genocide. Think twice before you seek empathy or allies here, and then think again.

>Why should Violent Islam that invaded (~600 AD) the Lands of Palestine lying to the west of the River Jordan and Dead Sea have the right to keep their conquests made by forced conversion, enslavement, persecution, and execution.

It’s odd observing you guys, shifting from a third person singular abstract subject to a third person plural adjective describing obviously concrete individuals without so much as flinching in the process of rendering such terrible syntax. Thank God editors are spared the misfortune of assisting you.

In any event …

Was it ‘Umar that wanted the Jews kept out of Jerusalem when he took over the city in the 7th century? Can you recall the history for us, please? I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t want to be caught making any embarrassingly false claims, now.

>Why is it deemed necessary by the forces of Violent Islam that all or any Palestinians who are not of Muslim Faith may never return to land they were expelled from?

http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/gazas-christians-and-muslims-grow-closer-defiance-israeli-attacks-372261379

>Why must Violent Islam occupy the Temple Mount, the holiest site of the Jewish religion?

Ah, okay … So you’re one of those guys. Well, now, that certainly puts things into perspective.

>Violent Islam does have the “Right to Return” home, whether that is East Bank Muslim Palestine…

Good to know.

>Or, further West such as Mecca or Qom.

I think your orientation is a bit off.

>Indeed it is more than a right, it is a “Duty to Return” as an end to the Violent Muslim occupation of Jewish and Christian lands.

Yeah.

Those measly merkavas and white phosphorus are no match against raucous stone-throwing teenagers and unarmed paramedics.

Such a violent, violent religion it is.

Really horrendous.

Anti-semitism is at its deepest and truest core the primary expression of the will to survive of any non-Jewish people.

Literally everything else said about it is cover for that fact.

It’s not anti-semitism, it’s counter-semitism.

The current definition of antisemitism is no longer hatred of the Jews as Jews; it is no longer criticism of the behavior of the Jews. Now, it is the mere candid description of the behavior of Jews, and a perceived insufficiency in the adulation of them. In other words, antisemitism is now the perceived insufficient appreciation of the collective genius of the Jews and the acknowledgement of their unique victimhood.

The next step is the that the refusal of the goyim to wallow in self-hatred and guilt for the plight of the poor Jew will become the next original sin of humanity.

The moral degeneration of the modern world is the largest vindication of Hitler that the Nazis could have ever hoped for.

Every day that moral and civic clown-world persists is another day that the sane world thinks “Hitler was right”. And he was. About everything.

There is no evidence to the contrary. Every aspect of the modern world is evidence in favor of Hitler’s perspective. That he was correct in terms of morality, politics, his views of society, and their diseases is now absolutely undeniable.

If Hitler had won then we would have none of this moral, cultural, civic, and political perversion, subversion, and rot. The degeneration that we have today is the very thing that Hitler was fighting.

Being anti-Hitler has become strictly equivalent to being anti-morality and anti-civilization. Any propagandist attempting to make statements to the contrary de facto aligns themselves with the worst perversions of human culture and society that not only exist but dominate today because Hitler lost.

It’s odd observing you guys, shifting from a third person singular abstract subject to a third person plural adjective describing obviously concrete individuals without so much as flinching in the process of rendering such terrible syntax. Thank God editors are spared the misfortune of assisting you.

I lifted the syntax from “xRasputin” to parallel his argument structure. So if you want to blame the tortured language on some, blame the original not the intermediary.

Can you recall the history for us, please? I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t want to be caught making any embarrassingly false claims, now.

I am referring to the 1st Muslim invasion of 638 AD. (1) Obviously the city changed hands many times over its history. It may be the most fought over piece of real estate on the globe.

This is a large part of the underlying problem. There are multiple creditable historical claims to parcels of land. And, as land can have only one current owner, some of those claims must be resolved via other compensation such as land elsewhere or cash.

Or, further West such as Mecca or Qom. …. I think your orientation is a bit off.

Guilty. Bad editing on my part. I was going to start the paragraph with Qom and Mecca and move West. When I restructured the order to start with Muslim Palestine, I should have changed West to East.

Those measly merkavas and white phosphorus are no match against raucous stone-throwing teenagers and unarmed paramedics. … Such a violent, violent religion it is.

Yes. A violent religion that murders 13 year old little girls in their sleep (2). Keeping murderers on the other side of barriers works. Letting murderers cross barriers will only result in more dead children.

Hamas could reduce the border casualty rate to near zero overnight. All they have to do is stop organizing military assaults on the border.

_____

(1) http://history-of-israel.org/history/time_line.php

(2) http://www.timesofisrael.com/a-terrorist-murdered-my-daughter-in-her-bed-tearful-mother-says/

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/04/04/592600/Israel-Eldad-Egypt-Morsi-coup-Sisi

Israel was behind the 2013 coup in Egypt that toppled Mohamed Morsi, the African country’s first ever democratically-elected president, an Israeli general has revealed

>I lifted the syntax from “xRasputin” to parallel his argument structure.

No, you didn’t. There’s no comparable syntax in his writing, though it could use some polishing.

[Yet another tiresome tu quoque rationale deleted]

>I am referring to the 1st Muslim invasion of 638 AD.

I didn’t ask what you were referring to. I asked, “Was it ‘Umar that wanted the Jews kept out of Jerusalem when he took over the city in the 7th century?”

Quite telling that you refuse to answer the question.

By the way, have you ever heard of Dr. David J. Wasserstein? He’s the Eugene Greener Jr. Professor of Jewish Studies at Vanderbilt University and a mensch all the same. Anyhow, through an exacting study of Medieval Jewish history, Dr. Wasserstein has concluded that, were it not for Islam, Jews would have been consigned to the dustin of history. Here’s a taste of what he’s written:

What happened in Islamic Spain – waves of Jewish cultural prosperity paralleling waves of cultural prosperity among the Muslims – exemplifies a larger pattern in Arab Islam. In Baghdad, between the ninth and the twelfth centuries; in Qayrawan (in north Africa), between the ninth and the 11th centuries; in Cairo, between the 10th and the 12th centuries, and elsewhere, the rise and fall of cultural centres of Islam tended to be reflected in the rise and fall of Jewish cultural activity in the same places.

From So, what did the Muslims do for the Jews?

Kind of puts the kibosh on your earlier claims, doesn’t it?

[lame rationale for Israeli land theft deleted]

>A violent religion that murders 13 year old little girls in their sleep

Iman al-Hams is another 13-year old girl you might want to remember. But instead of being killed by a 17-year old hothead, she was murdered by a captain of the “most morally upright army in the world.” Some details for you:

Witnesses described how the captain shot Iman twice in the head, walked away, turned back and fired a stream of bullets into her body. Doctors at Rafah’s hospital said she had been shot at least 17 times.

On the tape, the company commander then “clarifies” why he killed Iman: “This is commander. Anything that’s mobile, that moves in the zone, even if it’s a three-year-old, needs to be killed. Over.”

The army’s original account of the killing said that the soldiers only identified Iman as a child after she was first shot. But the tape shows that they were aware just how young the small, slight girl was before any shots were fired.

Israeli officer: I was right to shoot 13-year-old child”

Pretty sure Islam had nothing to do with this. There’s quite a significant record of such outstanding behavior by other members of this officer’s faith community (which is just so exponentially superior to Islam). I’ll gladly provide them for you upon request.

And I know you could care less about international law — seeing as how you’re a big fan of Jewish exceptionalism — but the Geneva Conventions are pretty clear on the legality of armed resistance in the face of illegal occupation. Kiryat Arba, the home of Hallel Ariel, is an illegal settlement predicated upon a lie, a ruse played upon the goyim. From Ha’aretz we read

The system of confiscating land by military order for the purpose of establishing settlements was an open secret in Israel throughout the 1970s, according to people involved in creating and implementing the system.

Its goal was to present the appearance of complying with international law, which forbids construction for civilian purposes on occupied land. In practice, everyone involved, from settlers to defense officials, knew that the assertion the land was meant for military rather than civilian use was false.

Secret 1970 Document Confirms First West Bank Settlements Built on a Lie

Kiryat Arba is also a haven for Jewish extremists who venerate the unabashedly racist Meir Kahane and Baruch Goldstein, perpetrator of the Cave of Patriarchs Massacre, who murdered 29 Muslim congregants gathered for prayer at the Ibrahimi Mosque.

So it isn’t as if Hallel’s circumstances were the same as Iman’s. Hallel didn’t deserve to be murdered, but her family illegally occupies the West Bank — an action which, according to international law, makes them a legitimate target. Conversely, there is no justification under the Geneva Conventions for the grisly murder of Iman al-Hams by “Captain R,” who conceals his identity out of sheer cowardice, knowing full well how egregious his crime is.

>Keeping murderers on the other side of barriers works.

It is, indeed, an extremely effective method by which Israeli murderers are able to gun down unarmed cameramen and paramedics like game, firing rounds at demonstrators and by-standers alike from a yellow-bellied distance behind their ironically named “security fence.”

[“Blame Hamas” cliché deleted]

Not that you care much for historical accuracy, but that “history-of-israel” link includes false information. The Fatimids didn’t ascend to power in Jerusalem in 638 C.E. You would know that had you actually bothered to study history rather than copy-and-paste the template pabulum your boiler room foreman has prepared for you.

Tell the boys in Tel Aviv they’re going to have to put forward more effort than this. Their work is just so goyischer these days.

hear hear

Anti-semitism is at its deepest and truest core the primary expression of the will to survive of any non-Jewish people.

you’d have to have your head so far up your ….. to not be anti-semitic these days

PROFOUND. Every word.

International Jewry is insatiable in its ethnocentric narcissism and in its insistence upon placing unendurable and manifestly unjust burdens upon the rest of humanity.

They are termites, the necessary-for-survival cultural habitat of the goyim they target is wood, and they chew relentlessly in instinctive concert so as to eradicate their targeted enemy just as they did the Canaanites and other goyim ethnic groups.

It insists upon giving “the fight against antisemitism” absolute priority in the new moral canon of globalism, as if antisemitism were some kind of irrational hatred based upon envy or ignorance, when in fact it is a rational, morally healthy response to the age old criminal behavior of the Jewish collective.

Following one hundred years later the path of the Bolshevik Jews whose first step in inflicting “the Jewish Terror” as their victim Russians called it was to declare criticism of Jews a capital crime thereby facilitating to the max their eventual slaughter of what Solzhenitsyn estimates to have been 67 million Russian/Ukrainian Christians.

It demands the absolute and unqualified right to claim victim status and puts a trademark upon taking offense at even the slightest perception of gentile animosity towards the Zionist and Talmudic psychopathy and criminality. In other words, it is virtually a crime to even take notice of wrongdoing done by Jews – provided such activity is not directed at other and more prominent Jews. One example of this is the founding of the ADL in response to a Jewish child murderer and rapist having justice served to him for a crime he committed against a non-Jewish girl. In the mind of organized Jewry, this is considered persecution.

The #ADL=”LeoFrankSociety” history you reference is illustrative of the pattern of Jew lust to slaughter whites and absolute willingness to incinerate blacks as fuel to achieve that end as Frank demonstrated by murdering a white girl and then founding/activating the ADL to frame a black man for the capital crime.

It rejects the overwhelming evidence that Jews were largely responsible for bringing to power the greatest, most murderous and repressive regime in European history, and were disproportionately represented in the councils of its government.

Jew Bolsheviks perpetrated “The Jewish Terror” delighting in killing 67 million white Christians.

In its chronically litigious and whining fashion- its demand to claim eternal victim status while simultaneously usurping the mantle of unique genius and conquering hero, it prepares to bring down upon itself the avalanche of the people’s resentment and their truly righteous indignation.

Incarnate God Jesus told us (John 8:44) they’re descendants of the devil. So while it may appear now that they’re winning, we know they can’t win because Almighty God will ultimately prevail.

If you can clear individual cookies from your browser … such as from the NYT … which allows only 5 free articles per month …

Following one hundred years later the path of the Bolshevik Jews whose first step in inflicting “the Jewish Terror” as their victim Russians called it was to declare criticism of Jews a capital crime thereby facilitating to the max their eventual slaughter of what Solzhenitsyn estimates to have been 67 million Russian/Ukrainian Christians.

i think about this too and notice how criticism of jews is being punished more and more harshly all the time in western countries

what could the reasonable person conclude other than its the same group of miscreants trying to take us down the same murderous road

But Jews have a knack of conflating and presenting the mess as the reality that you and me have to respect. No, we don’t.

Good line, bears repeating.

No doubt.

They did it before, and nothing about them has changed other than a few generations.

Any sense that we will receive warnings, indicators or lead time to enable mobilization of a defense is misplaced and could be tragically devastating to us, our loved ones, our lineage, and our culture which has so greatly benefited the world.

The bottom line is Democrats are going to have to pay a price for their lack of fealty with their Jewish money people. It’s either that or look like wimps to their constituency which is getting more fed up with Israel by the year.

It’s likely unavoidable –though they will try– but probably the better course for the long term. The Republicans will play the ‘Dem’s are anti-Israel’ card and it may work to chop 10% off Jewish vote totals but I very much doubt the GOP could make major impact in the Jewish vote barrier. This is mostly about money. Not changing votes.

Who chose Saddam ? Do you want to know the answer boy? Do you ? Just find d out who chose Sisi of Egypt !!!

Assad is a monster !! So are your elected presidents ,some of them 2 nd times f them 2 nd times ll presidents from Roosevelt ( including Teddy ) to Trump.

Take your concerns form Christians to the graves of those millions muslims killed by Bush Clinton and Bush .

If you can clear individual cookies from your browser … such as from the NYT … which allows only 5 free articles per month …

Dopey and naive, I have no idea what a cookie is(other than the edible type), or how they can be cleared.

JUNE 6, 2021 4:54 PM2

Israel Air Force Kicks Off First F-35 Fighter Jet Drill Abroad With US, Britain and Italy

https://www.algemeiner.com/2021/06/06/israel-air-force-kicks-off-first-f-35-fighter-jet-drill-abroad-with-us-britain-and-italy/

———-
https://www.algemeiner.com/list/the-top-100-people-positively-influencing-jewish-life-2020/

The Top 100 People Positively Influencing Jewish Life, 2020
In honor of The Algemeiner’s seventh annual gala, this time held virtually, we are delighted to unveil our seventh ‘J100’ list of the top one hundred individuals who have positively influenced Jewish life this past year. Before you… show more