How does ” ‘Antisemitism is a business plan.’ ” even support a defamation suit? There’s no verifiable statement of fact, and it doesn’t harm anyone’s reputation.

Hello, Gilad. I’d be happy to send a check for $100 somewhere, or a money order of some kind. I’ve never heard of those other choices you list, and I don’t do paypal. Do you have an American friend or agent who could cash an American check and send you the $? $100 isn’t much against the debt you have, but there must be a lot of Americans who know of your writings, who are angry at the forces which have put you in such plight, who would similarly send modest amounts.

MR. ATZMON, MOVE TO USA—OUR BROKEN LEGAL SYSTEM IS LESS BROKEN THAN UK.

Sir, I am sorry to hear that “Antisemitism is a business plan” is considered actionable “defamation” in UK. Who was “defamed”? Only the person who was defamed can bring an action, not some group.

Luckily, in US, there is the first amendment. There is NO group libel. So if you say “Group X is all evil”, or are thieves, you cannot be sued.

Yes, I hope all of us can help you to the extent we can afford. And good luck. But move to US, please.

As CAA has explained its objective, the lawsuit was intended both to silence me and to wreck my career…

this is what they do to all of us, no matter how small

Gilad, you’ve got to offer some better payment methods than bitcoin. Have a look at some paypal alternatives and get back to us. I will pitch in $100 once you do.

They always go too far. They never learn. Eventually, people get so sick of their anti-Christ ways that they turn on them.

Play stupid games….win stupid prizes.

Sorry, but I don’t think “elementary freedoms in the USA” are in any danger – even from the Israel lobby (despite the high regard in which they hold themselves – courtesy of preening popinjays like Dersho-witless who mistake endless repetition of bibi talking points for insight).

History is history and English is English. I’ll take the constitution over shurat damned-to-hell (is that the name of the zionist hasbara lawfare brigade?) any day.

Yup, you need to move to the United States. That way you can meet our very own hasbara heads and go head-to-head with them – without fear of disaster.

Sure, you’ll lose a few “friends”, jobs and be be denied tenure, but you sure won’t end up in prison – even debtor’s prison (the Bernie Made-Off route aside)…

An added benefit is that Counsel Mueller might even put a few Israeli spies in the brig. You do you remember that great American patriot Pollard – yes?

It’s not but the allegation is much stronger. In particular, Atzmon allegedly (the article has been removed since Atzmon admitted it was libelous so I can’t judge it for myself) accused Campaign Against Anti-Semitism as using Antisemitism as a business plan and of fabricating and exaggerating anti-Semitic incidents to raise more money and profit.

Some links on the topic (from Atzmon haters, to be sure, so focus on the facts of the case):

https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/gilad-atzmon-to-face-trial-for-accusing-jewish-group-of-inventing-anti-semitism/
https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/gilad-atzmon-forced-to-ask-supporters-for-funds-after-campaign-against-antisemitism-libel-lawsuit-1.473179
https://thejewishweekly.com/anti-semite-gilad-atzmon-makes-humiliating-apology/

The last article claims to quote the judge in the case as finding that Mr Atzmon had deliberately accused Falter (Chairman of the group) of:

dishonestly fabricating anti-Semitic incidents; deliberately exaggerating the prevalence of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic activity (including being too ready to characterise as anti-Semitism legitimate criticism of Israel); by doing these things Mr Falter therefore risked increasing anti-Semitism; Mr Falter’s motive was to obtain funds (including funds from the British taxpayer) to support the activities of the CAA and to provide his own income; the funds obtained by this fabrication and misrepresentation were consequently obtained by Mr Falter’s fraud; and Mr Falter is guilty of hypocrisy – he campaigns against anti-Semitism but he is content with its continued prevalence (even resorting to the manufacture of incidents) because his income and that of the CAA depend upon it.

This basically amounts to a claim that Falter and Campaign Against Anti-Semitism were defrauding the public to raise money for themselves. Atzmon essentially ended up admitting in court all of his claims were false, based on the above judge rulings (which the judge made after reading the blog post in question). Presumably Atzmon figured he could not possibly prove those claims.

Would definitely be much easier to defend those statements in the US, where the plaintiff would have to prove reckless disregard for the truth, rather than the defendant having to prove it is true.

anti-semitism, anti-semitism, why does one have to defend oneself against such a charge, as if it were as criminal and bad as, say, a child-molester. We..the world..will never be free of these freaks who can sit at stool, smell their stink, and still believe they’re made of finer stuff than the neighbor doing the same thing next door. Until we can say, Is Netanyahu a Semite? Ariel Sharon a Semite? Dershowitz a Semite? Then hell yes, I’m an anti-semite and proud of it!

Exercise Free Speech…..get attacked by jews

The answer to your question is that UK libel law is a complicated thing and lawyers will argue over what words mean. In particular, there is a concept called (I seem to remember) something called an innuendo meaning, which is where someone can bring a libel action based not on the actual words, but on an alleged meaning.

I suspect that might be what happened in this case, but do you own research, as I am not a lawyer.

USA may be a free speech harbor for Christians, but it is a dangerous place for Jews.

https://www.facebook.com/adira.jenny?__tn__=CH-R&eid=ARD-6uAk7kSwixXJrn37I-wofGgF8_LVQE_9tFoU8L1CdKereV3aq77d0oBVKNAESj-qojmPSqPdV46j&hc_ref=ARShkh79ABHFeWE60-qFFggXCv1TFQKBXlfw1XefdsEplx5S4HNJhd9b01tehvQj_MY&fref=nf&__xts__%5B0%5D=68.ARCJx3Sh6xwKHSVs2OKkYoReBHxu5-Rf6ZL-gDH7TK5CJj3EU2PSFwFCrvVWXcBp5J1sieiv7BaGN_tK7axFomi_YqSD718jNxLaM7nEePQnei5mXUiRTmMRC32cCzjt43u4CcbzbSrihBYUvl7k7Yi7r0s70dDXnk7VF1VHfTXVYPQ41NDuqM1S75m-B-PfUNl0wYHB5A3f3fbsTQ

Adira Rosen reports that someone at Carnegie Mellon University committed a hate-crime — scrawled a swastika two or three times in a book!!

Where will it end?
The Crooked Road to Panther Hollowschwitz

Sorry, Anonymous, your reply is too cryptic, or I’m too dimwitted, to understand its meaning. Dangerous place for Jews?

“Antisemitism” is a “business plan”??

Only if a global extortion racket conducted by sociopathic war criminals is a business plan.