The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Striker Archive
United States of South Africa: Black FBI Agent Targets White Men, Including Cops, for Their "Hate Speech"
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The FBI announced yesterday that it was opening up a federal “hate crime” investigation into Edward Cagney Mathews during a wild Mount Laurel Council meeting.

Mathews received national attention after a mob of blacks organized by Black Lives Matter gathered outside of his home in New Jersey looking to do him harm. Previously, the irate white man was filmed saying “nigger” to local blacks, but did not engage in any violence or criminal activity during the incident.

Nevertheless, politicians and activists embedded in the justice system are looking to punish Mathews for saying the naughty word to send a political message.

Following the chaos outside his home, Burlington County prosecutors elected to stack Mathews with an avalanche of crimes, ranging from possession of a “weapon” (a slingshot), criminal mischief, and various drug related offenses related to hallucinogenic mushrooms found in his home.

A computer-generated sentencing recommendation called for Mathews to be released, but Judge Terence Cook, who is black, overruled the objective assessment and ordered him held without bond because he is “racist.”

The FBI agent who told the anti-white mob that he would pursue Mathews on much more serious federal crimes, Special Agent Vernon Addison, has a long history of railroading white men for saying “nigger.”

While the United States has no official hate speech law, prosecutors, federal agents and judges informally punish those who express views or sentiments they find offensive by exploiting gray areas in existing laws and abusing their powers.

Setting Up Police Chief Frank Nucera

Agent Addison’s first prosecuted a white man for saying “nigger” in the case of Bordentown Township police chief Frank Nucera.

According to the 2016 PDF iconfederal complaint obtained by National Justice, Nucera would privately use words like “nigger” and “moulie” to refer to black criminals he encountered on the job.

The FBI decided to punish Nucera for his impolite language by accusing him of smacking a handcuffed black suspect’s head against a door frame during an arrest at a Ramada Inn in September 2016.

Agent Addison admits that the alleged victim, Timothy Stroye, was resisting arrest and fighting with the police, yet his federal complaint charged Nucera with assault as a hate crime for his actions during the struggle due to his use of the word “nigger” afterwards.

During an interview with the FBI, Nucera held that he did not assault Stroye, which Addison used to charge him for “lying to the FBI” — a kafkaesque tactic typically used to guarantee a conviction when agents and prosecutors feel their overall case is weak.

The thug the FBI was destroying the veteran cop over, Stroye, is a repeat offender and persistent danger to the public who has been arrested multiple times since the 2016 encounter with Nucera.

During Nucera’s trial, federal prosecutors struggled to make the case that Stroye was a victim and did not want their most important witness to testify due to his extensive rap sheet in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, which includes instances of aggravated assault, including against a corrections officer, stealing a car, access device fraud, and theft.

In May 2020, Stroye, who had active warrants, was arrested again for beating up his girlfriend.

Ultimately, the challenge of establishing Stroye as honest led to a mistrial on the most serious charges of hate crime and assault. Nucera was only convicted of making a false statement to the FBI, and last May he received a highly punitive 28 month sentence. The state did not make an adequate case proving that Nucera ever did lie to the FBI about attacking Stroye, but whites on the jury were intimidated by their black peers into convicting him of something or face accusations of racism. Nucera is currently appealing his conviction.

Agent Addison Has Killed An Unarmed Black Man

The irony of Special Agent Addison’s anti-racist zeal is that he was actually involved in the killing of an unarmed black man.

In 1997, Addison and his FBI task force gunned down Michael Byrd in Elizabeth, New Jersey, a black man who was later found to be unarmed.

A grand jury at the time refused to indict the authorities involved in the shooting, but if Addison were white and the incident happened today, the story would be different.

While using racial slurs may be seen as rude by some, it is wholly legal to do so.

Activist FBI agents like Vernon Addison, along with those enabling and supporting him, are political and racial actors. They would never pursue a black man using anti-white racial slurs with the same fervor.

(Republished from National Justice by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 24 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. absolutely correct, a double standard is applied, which is itself racist.

    • Replies: @Bite Moi
  2. The concept of ‘Hate Crime’ was invented to bolster and legitimize an older invention: anti-semitism.

    There is no such thing as anti-semitism. There is only conflict of interest between jews and gentiles. There is no such thing as ‘Hate Crime’. There is only crime.

    If the Supreme Court cannot flush ‘Hate Crimes’ and ‘anti-semitism’ down the toilet, we’ll always be stuck with a flawed system.

  3. Chris Moore says: • Website

    Bolsheviks and Zionists are always looking to infiltrate and take over the State and use it to punish their enemies — eventually ending in mass murder. Their history shows them to be unrepentant killers. Anyone on the Bolshevik+Zionist team is the enemy of humanity. That goes for the left-wing usual suspects, but also for the pro-Zionist “conservatives.”

    The Bolshevik+Zionist enemy within explains the collapse of the West entirely. Zionist “conservatives” aren’t general recognized as enemies of the West, but they’re among the deadliest enemies, just as Judas was one of the deadliest enemies to Jesus.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  4. So much for freedom of speech. Some of our oh so special groups are so sensitive, that they needed to be protected from hurty words, lest they have a fainting spell.

    This squeaked by 5-4 in 2017. I doubt it would win today, given the SCOTUS traitors that stabbed Americans who voted for Trump in the back by refusing to hear an appeal on the 11/2020 vote fraud.

    Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment

    https://reason.com/volokh/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaf/

    A certain group, who keeps shouting that they are Chosen by G-d to rule over us peons definitely want Hate Speech laws to help protect their very lucrative WWII con involving an event that did NOT happen, yet they never get called out for being supremacists. Why that would be anti-Semitic.

  5. Punishing people for their use of a a particular word is well known to the Biden administration. They use “white”, in white supremacists to mean ALL whites. Ones true intentions, feelings, are known by what they do not by what they say. People say all kinds of things about every subject there is. It doesn’t mean they will actualize anything they say about them. If that wasn’t true, I’d have been a fireman, sailor, engineer, baseball pitcher and rock star. Many of us would even have “killed” some of our best childhood friends after the usual squabbles. Yet we never did or had any intention of doing so. This is the danger of judging people by what they say and why “hate speech” laws are lunacy. Sticks and stones…..Yet, reason is fast disappearing in this country.

  6. Exile says:

    28 months for a malum prohibitum offense (at best). For a police chief. Meet the new boss – putting the screws to the old boss.

    Rule of law doesn’t matter much when the rules and laws are unwritten and discriminatorily enforced.

    The FBI and its enablers in the state courts are doing more to destroy the legitimacy of the American government in the eyes of the people than the KGB or the ebil Chinese ever have.

    • Agree: eah
  7. Bolshevik jew invents new words, “racist” and “racism”.
    Novo Bolsheviki Talmud thumping, nation wrecking, culturally corrosive, Zionist defiler, legal/media/NGO jews invent new words, “hate speech” and “hate crime”
    Shared intent; to shut down reasoned argument, criticism and expressed righteous based anger over vampire pirate predatory despoiling and ruination.
    (((They))) have succeeded in legal codification of the above buzzwords in Europe.
    The same sweaty legalistic malfeasance is starting to become de jure AND de facto here in this (((Ruling Swine))) and Flying Chimpanzee shock troop afflicted, very troubled—by intent—country.
    ALL “hate crime” / “hate speech” statutes and enhancements MUST be vigorously opposed and nullified…
    to at least slow down the South Africanization of this failed republic and gangster enforced artificial “Union”.

    otoh, in a secession triggered New Civil War, those bullshit charges won’t amount to much.

  8. Chimpoids as judges, Chimpoids in Gubbamint, Chimpoids in Media and Chimpoids with badges and guns…enabled by (((The Usual Suspects)))…
    what could possibly go right ?

  9. SafeNow says:

    “A mob of blacks organized by Black Lives Matter gathered outside of his home”

    Remember banging pots and pans, and megaphones, and flashlights, outside Mitch McConnell’s house, and he was later apologizing to his neighbors? Does this affect his speech and conduct? And maybe he’d like to be able to eat in restaurants. I can’t prove it, but I believe that in the back of many judges’ minds as they prepare to rule is the “mob outside the house” factor.

    Regarding hate speech, what is needed is a substitute. A flattering word… like “Scholar!!” Or perhaps a neutral word… something like “Person!!” Force the D.A. to argue that the substitute word or phrase was intended to have, and objectively does have, a sarcastic innuendo; that it is code.

  10. Stan says:

    The FBI became a subsidiary of the ADL in the 1960’s.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  11. Bite Moi says:
    @Alfred Barnes

    Alfred Barnes———-The definition of racist is whatever the Elites say is racist.

  12. Yet Hunter Biden remains free. Free to do his “art” so prized by the wealthy. Fraudulent Biden must be proud.

  13. Derogatory language is uncivil, and lying can be unethical, but such utterances are not crimes.

    The lawyer-judges cannot understand the simple English that #1 is written in.

  14. Richard B says:
    @beavertales

    If the Supreme Court cannot flush ‘Hate Crimes’ and ‘anti-semitism’ down the toilet, we’ll always be stuck with a flawed system.

    Flawed? A more accurate word would be corrupt.

    Given human imperfection a flawed system is the norm. Even a great system, should one exist (does anyone know any?), has its flaws.

    No. What we have is a deeply corrupt system. One that is, at this point, iredeemable and irreversible.

    In fact, to help prove my point I’d only need to quote you again.

    There is no such thing as anti-semitism. There is only conflict of interest between jews and gentiles. There is no such thing as ‘Hate Crime’. There is only crime.

    Exactly!

  15. Richard B says:
    @Stan

    The FBI became a subsidiary of the ADL in the 1960’s.

    Bingo!

    More and more are waking up to this. Even Tucker’s covering it more regularly.

    People on the Left were saying this in the 60’s, with the claim that it was working the other way. And it very well may have been. But not for the reasons they thought.

    On the other hand, everyone I knew on the Right refused to acknowledge it until recently. The whole Right/Left thing is a huge obstacle for whites. Huge!

    The sooner they ditch both the better.

  16. J1234 says:

    My question isn’t so much, “where is the Constitution in all of this?” but rather, “where are the defenders of the Constitution in all of this?” Both in and outside the government. What explains their silence?

    The mob explains their silence. The extreme left knows that the mob is a better tool for nullifying the Constitution then any left wing judge. And blacks in government know that making laws isn’t so much a function of legislative action on behalf of the people per the Constitution, but of creating a social dynamic, then eventually codifying that dynamic on behalf of the moral elite.

    I have no idea of what Eric Striker’s word filter/censor standards will do to my comment because of my next statement, but if you’re over the age of 40, you’ve certainly heard white people say the word “nigger” on many occasions. Those people almost certainly never lynched or murdered or vandalized the property of blacks, because words and actions are very different things. That’s been a concept that was understood by every American for a long time. But now words and actions are the same thing, because what better way to limit the speech of people you disagree with than by codifying that concept?

  17. Striker:

    “Activist FBI agents like Vernon Addison, along with those enabling and supporting them, are political and racial actors. They would never pursue a black man using anti-white racial slurs with the same fervor.”

    It’s hard to argue with that.

  18. Am I the only one having trouble seeing where the FBI ends and the ADL begins?

  19. The FBI announced yesterday that it was opening up a federal “hate crime” investigation into Edward Cagney Mathews during a wild Mount Laurel Council meeting.

    They would never pursue a black man using anti-white racial slurs with the same fervor.

    ^^^ The opening and closing sentences. Striker, get a good proofreader. Always a Charlie Foxtrot with your slop.

  20. eah says:

    >Special Agent Vernon Addison

    Probably no one will be surprised to learn that Addison apparently gives presentations on ‘White Supremacy in Law Enforcement’ (link) — In 2019, Special Agent Addison received the Distinguished Service Award from the New Jersey Bias Crime Officers Association — And I bet you didn’t know there was a ‘Bias Crime Officers Association’ in New Jersey, or anywhere else for that matter.

    #17
    >”… with the same fervor.”

    They wouldn’t pursue him at all — I’ve said many times that ‘hate crime’ laws have only one target and exist for only one reason: to intimidate/silence and persecute Whites as their country is being demographically stolen from them — no self-respecting White should endorse the existence and/or use of ‘hate crime’ laws; in particular, don’t whine about their unequal application: that’s by design, and means they are functioning as intended by your enemies.

    #4

    Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment

    #6
    >28 months for a malum prohibitum offense (at best).

    For those who don’t know: malum prohibitum is a Latin phrase meaning something is unlawful only due to a statute, whereas malum in se is an act that is prima facie evil/wrong, i.e. in and of itself.

    Normally people are not charged with a ‘hate crime’ alone (although this is possible): a ‘hate crime’ charge is usually added as an enhancement in order to justify a stiffer sentence — how is a ‘hate crime’ recognized? — by some expression (as in ‘freedom of expression’, which includes freedom of speech) of the accused, i.e. either something the accused said at the time of the underlying offense , or perhaps said or wrote earlier — so it pertains to motive, and can also be seen as a malum prohibitum offense, i.e. the expression is not in and of itself wrong.

    But how is this reconciled with the SCOTUS ruling that ‘there is no hate speech exception to the First Amendment’? — meaning you cannot criminalize a form of expression, since this is covered/protected by the First Amendment — ?

  21. @beavertales

    If the Supreme Court cannot flush ‘Hate Crimes’ and ‘anti-semitism’ down the toilet, we’ll always be stuck with a flawed system.

    Only if the SCOTUS continues to be the final legal arbiter of a still-united “United States of America,” which is looking more unlikely with the passage of each new day. I foresee a day in the very near future where what are now defined as “hate crimes” will be everyday occurrences within those states that were once part of the USA, or some of the new ones that form from schisms occuring within old states. The SCOTUS’s quasi-legal excrement will by that point be seen as at best irrelevant and at worst a mockery of true law to not only be ignored, but used as an example of what “The Law” must never be allowed to become again.

    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
  22. @mocissepvis

    The U.S. Supreme Shysters are nine unelected, unaccountable, ethics-free megalomaniacs.

  23. “Hate crime” is a special class of crimes that exists only in the minds of leftists. There is no such thing as “hate crime,” either in English Common Law or in the long history of American jurisprudence. “Hate” has never been a factor in deciding the legality of an action. It can be safely assumed that many perpetrators hate the victims of their crimes, but that matters not. I’m sure perps harbor many neuroses, grudges, and personality disorders, but none of them factor into a criminal proceeding. The nature of the crime itself is the only compelling factor, not the mindset of the perp during the commission of said offense. If I’m thinking of rainbows and puppies while I’m killing a homeowner during a break-in, that does not mitigate the severity of my crime.

  24. mc23 says:
    @beavertales

    Anti- Ashkenazi is more like it. Anti- Semitism is the Palestine Nakba,

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Striker Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Becker update V1.3.2