The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Striker Archive
Trump Administration Changes to Fair Housing Act to be Immediately Challenged by the ACLU
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The judicial activism juggernaut, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), announced that it will be suing the Trump administration to veto new changes the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has implemented to the Fair Housing Act.

The alterations were made in the interest of protecting quality of life and staving off multiculturalism in the suburbs, which Trump hopes will help win suburban votes.

A document released by HUD Secretary Ben Carson dealing with the administration’s interpretation of the Disparate Impact Rule significantly raises the threshold of evidence needed for non-whites to sue for discrimination under the clause to explicit prohibitions on race or sex.

Under the Obama administration, HUD was weaponized further as a means for forcing “diversity” in white-majority suburbs. The result of this has been the exodus of blacks out of metropolitan areas to the suburbs, which has caused violent crime to migrate with them. Many suburbs are now more dangerous than cities.

Diane Yentel, the Jewish president and CEO of the National Low Income Housing Coalition, took to twitter to lash out at HUD’s rule change, declaring that it makes it “nearly impossible for POC to challenge discriminatory effects in hsg and beyond.”

Self-described “anxious Jew” and Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board member Abraham Gutman shrieked that “This is a huge fucking deal.”

Aside from a small group of Jewish activists, there doesn’t seem to be much general pushback against the new regulations. While many suburban whites like to virtue signal in favor of the latest left-wing racial and political fads, they are often on the front line of combating racial integration in their own children’s schools and neighborhoods, a trend colloquially known as NIMBYism (Not In My Backyard).

While surveys show most people are happy with the racial mix of their neighborhoods as they are, fringe elements backed by plutocratic money continue to use federal courts to dictate unpopular social engineering prescriptions from above.

The ACLU, which was founded by anarcho-communist Roger N. Baldwin, has specialized in this kind of tyrannical policy making. During the 1960s, Jewish litigation groups found that federal judges, often educated in elite cosmopolitan values, were significantly more likely to support Constitutionally dubious challenges and oppressive laws than democratically accountable legislators.

In the case of HUD’s new Disparate Impact Rule changes, the likelihood that it will survive an activist challenge in court is almost 0%.

In 2015’s Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., a 5-4 Supreme Court majority led by Ronald Reagan appointee Judge Anthony Kennedy found that plaintiffs in discrimination lawsuits had an absolute right to demonstrate disparate impact liability based on “unconscious prejudices” and “disguised animus” — specifically what Carson’s rule update undermines.

The partisan challenge now will be for lawyers to be able to get an expedited injunction against HUD before Trump can use it for his campaign.

(Republished from National Justice by permission of author or representative)
Hide 7 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Gunga Din says:

    There have been two major actions that have worked to destroy the White race in America. The first was integration of public schools, starting in the 50s and continuing until today. The second is the intent, by HUD, to integrate White neighborhoods with public housing for low/no income people. Re the first action, this was a literal call to arms for White people to fight integration and the ruination of White schools. I wish they’d have fought harder. The second is this plan to destroy White people by destroying the very place where they live. If the dems get back in power and reinstate this plan, I hope to God we act much more fervently than our parents did. Mr. Striker, I sincerely hope you print this.

    • Replies: @Realist
  2. Realist says:
    @Gunga Din

    You left out the… Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 also known as the Hart–Celler Act

    • Replies: @Wyatt
    , @Gunga Din
  3. Mulegino1 says:

    Virtually everything about the so called “Civil Rights Movement” is based on a lie. It only degraded the standard of living and the quality of life of the majority, and did nothing to improve the lot of blacks here in the US. Forced integration is an act of tyranny which ultimately reduces all of society (save the elites) to the lowest common cultural, spiritual and socioeconomic denominators.

    If there was indeed injustice in black chattel slavery, it was in reality nothing worse than what was experienced by millions of Europeans (especially Slavs and Eastern Europeans in general) in the past millennium, and most likely a far sight better. As a matter of fact, the conditions of the black population in the Southern US under servitude were invariably orders of magnitude better than in their ancestral homeland.

    Negro servitude redounded far more to the detriment of the Christians of European descent in the United States than to the imported black population. The latter undoubtedly experienced a vast improvement in its quality of life and life expectancy, but the importation of millions of Africans into the US opened up cultural inroads in America which would, over time and left unchecked, and ultimately used by the other alien element, Jewry,have disastrous consequences for our European cultural and spiritual heritage.

    • Replies: @jsinton
  4. jsinton says:

    Much truth to your words, paleface.

  5. We can only hope and pray that the evil Devils who have taken over the ACLU are roundly defeated by those who believe in the Constitution and in America. The ACLU should be dismantled as it has become infested by insane SJWs who hate the Constitution.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Striker Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.