The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Striker Archive
Southern Poverty Law Center Official Who Led Armed Communist Paramilitary March Calls for Government Action Against Funding of "Hate Groups"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Last year, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Lecia Brooks helped lead a group of heavily armed communist extremists through downtown Stone Mountain, Georgia.

According to reporting by the Springfield News Sun, out of the crowd of 150 or so Brooks marched with and then officially addressed, “many of the protesters had handkerchiefs over their faces, and several were armed.”

Brooks then identified herself with and lauded the hammer-and-sickle waving, assault rifle wielding mob, who held signs calling for violence: “We turned them back at Stone Mountain, and we can turn them back at every turn. We just have to show up,” she proclaimed.

Video of the rally leaves no room for plausible deniability about the nature of the militants. None of the groups at this rally were made up of MSNBC liberals or normal Democrats. The SPLC officials knowingly marched with people who want to impose communism and anarchism on America by the use of armed violence, and were proud to use them to terrorize their political opponents.

The display was so disturbing that the SPLC’s supporters in the mass media quickly memoryholed the supposed victory against Confederate heritage groups. The Huffington Post, which apparently sent journalists to cover the event, wrote one small article about it and did not mention the many Soviet flags or masked, armed men sporting red armbands.

In spite of her close ties with violent left-wing extremists, Brooks found herself testifying in Congress on behalf of the SPLC today, taking credit for financial and social media deplatforming of “hate groups” and demanding more government action against “hate groups.”

None of the “lone wolves” involved in attacks Brooks spoke about received any kind of organized funding for their weapons or plans, nor did they act on behalf of any specific organization, yet in her testimony she disingenuously ties them to the myriad of advocacy groups and 501(c)(3)’s on the SPLC’s arbitrary “hate group” list.

Brooks then condemned attempts at applying the law to “antifa” and “Black Identity Extremists,” instead urging the government to use all of its resources against law-abiding nationalists to prevent them from having the resources to exercise their constitutional rights to free speech and assembly.

According to Brooks, the SPLC has played an important role in Amazon, Paypal, and Facebook’s censoring of books, charities, ideas and opinions. In a 2018 poll, 72% of Americans stated that social media censorship is politically motivated, not a national security question. 51% said that the government should step in to protect political speech. The agenda of Silicon Valley, who today give the SPLC and Anti-Defamation League the power to decide who can and cannot use the internet public square, is extremely unpopular.

That the House of Representatives defers to Brooks on these matters is yet another brazen failure in actually representing the public, or protecting it from the wanton political violence and harassment of private citizens anarchists and communists commit in America all the time and brag about. Their close ties to the SPLC play a role in why the justice and legal system is applied differently to members of “antifa.”

Brooks is not the only person with extremist ties at the SPLC. One of its “senior investigative reporters,” a former BDSM writer named Michael Edison Hayden, was named by extremism researcher Dr Eoin Lenihan as a journalist with close ties with “antifa,” which is supported by threatening messages Hayden has sent in the past openly threatening to send his associates in “antifa” to their family’s home. Hayden has made a name for himself for stalking outside the homes of wives, children and elderly relatives of people targeted by the SPLC for their political views, in attempts to silence them.

Another SPLC employee, Hannah Gais, who attended the Congressional hearing with Brooks, also has significant ties to violent anarchist and communist groups.

These people do not belong anywhere near decisions made by the state or law enforcement. If you feel your basic rights as an American are being eroded, as 92% of Americans do, this is a big piece of the puzzle.

(Republished from National Justice by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Ideology • Tags: American Media, Antifa, Political Correctness, SPLC 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. anarchyst says:

    It’s the JEWS…it’s always the JEWS

    Our present situation and the devolving into the morass of “multiculturalism” and “diversity” is no accident. The jewish talmud and that jewish invention-communism has “rules” for the debasement and eventual destruction of (white) civil society.

    The following statements are a result of personal experiences–your mileage may vary…

    I came of age during the first so-called “civil-rights” movement and saw for myself the underhanded dealings, the demonization of decent, law-abiding whites, and in general, the deterioration of civil society.

    Almost all of the “civil-rights” workers and demonstration “handlers” were of one persuasion–New York based leftist communist jews. They cared not one wit about true “civil rights”, but were there to create hate and discontent among their “pets”, their black charges (who were too stupid or naive to see that they were being used to suborn and destroy legitimate government and society–a favorite communist tactic).

    These New York-based “carpetbaggers” fomented their hate and discontent, only to become future “civil-rights” attorneys, race-hustlers, and America-hating leftist communists…and the ADL and $PLC being invented.

    Those of us whites who were in the middle of this “civil-rights” revolution had a saying: “Behind every negro, there is a jew”. No truer words were spoken.

    Let’s not forget their infestation of the nation’s education and entertainment systems, (which continues to the present day), in which they can spread their jewish supremacist poison.

    The so-called “non-violent civil-rights demonstrations” were anything but “non-violent”. Robberies, rapes, and other criminal acts were common, committed by the jewish “handlers” and their black charges but never reported, as even the “mainstream media” was “in on the game” and conveniently turned off their cameras during the acts of violence. You see, even then,”creating crises” was a part of the agenda.

    The “beginning of the end” of America was the use of federal troops against white Americans, which, in itself was a violation of “posse comitatus”–the prohibition on the use of federal troops for domestic “law enforcement” purposes. As most whites were (and still are) law-abiding, they (we) were “steamrollered” by the use of federal troops to crush honest dissent. We never recovered from those unconstitutional actions. It was all downhill from there…

    The next step may be “civil-war” in which us whites will have to take back our birthright by force.

    • Agree: Gunga Din, Irish Savant
    • Replies: @Bert
    , @Polemos
  2. JJR says:

    Good luck with that. Old-time America is dead, gone and buried. The future will see an Inner Party of disproportionately Jewish multi-billionaires hogging all wealth and power at the top, an Outer Party of liberal White/(((White))) and token minority footsoldiers enforcing doctrine and churning out propaganda, while the bottom 90% float on an ocean of drugs, pornography, junk food and low-brow entertainment.

  3. The SPLC officials knowingly marched with people who want to impose communism and anarchism on America…

    an·ar·chism /ˈanərˌkizəm/
    noun: anarchism

    Belief in the abolition of all “government” and the organization of society on a voluntary, cooperative basis without recourse to force or compulsion.

    Do not fear anarchism.

    assault rifle wielding mob

    Does anyone know why Striker is afraid of black rifles with pistol grips?

    He doesn’t strike me as the kind of guy who would be afraid of guns. Is he a yankee or something?

  4. Bert says:

    “The next step may be “civil-war” in which us whites will have to take back our birthright by force.”

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 40 years ago.

    Athens, Tennessee, 75 years ago.

    Know history.

  5. conatus says:

    A question that has not been asked is ‘Who appointed the SPLC as quasi governmental designator of Hate organizations?’ 
    Usually in the regulatory realm they need some sort of Authorization passed by Congress(like say a law) and the Executive Agencies issue a rule and you get 90 days for public comment in the Federal Register on said rule(sounding pretty legal Huh?). Then they put it in the Code of Federal Regulations. I was not aware this process had occurred? 
    In this case it seems as if the Media has simply appointed the SPLC the Supreme All-powerful Designator of what is and what is not Hate? The Media likes this Hate group scam because it provides quick headlines and clickbait for scary stories about people the consumers of media see in strip malls through their car windows.

  6. Polemos says:

    The next step may be “civil-war” in which us whites will have to take back our birthright by force.

    What are your thoughts about insurgency actions by indigenous cultures herein the Americas? For example, say the Cherokee or the Haudenosaunee or the Quechua act to take back their birthrights by force: will you embrace their right or liberty to do so?

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Striker Comments via RSS