The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Striker Archive
New Study Reveals Network of Jewish Corruption In American Literary Awards System
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The scholarly art publication, ASAP Journal, recently published a new study by Juliana Spahr and Stephanie Young showing that literary prizes are being rigged by a clique of Jews and gay activists from a few Ivy League schools.

Spahr and Young collected data from hundreds of award-winning poets and the often opaque panel of judges who decide winners and losers. They uncovered a small group of people awarding one another prizes to the exclusion of outsiders.

The most abusive in their findings was Robert Pinsky, the United States Poet Laureate from 1997-2000, who has personally collected numerous awards but has truly made a name for himself as a judge. Pinsky has distributed millions of dollars in cultural awards to friends and associates through his position.

As a judge, Pinsky helped Carl Phillips, a pioneer in “queer poetry,” win the Witter Bynner Poetry Fellowship, the Tufts Award, and an Academy of American Poets Fellowship. Pinsky personally taught Phillips at Boston University. Phillips later himself became a judge at Tufts after Pinsky gave up his seat.

Louise Gluck, a Jewish poet obsessed with the Holocaust, is a personal friend of Pinsky and has received tons of prizes from bodies he and Phillips both judge, such as the Wallace Stevens Award. So far, Gluck has accumulated $1.5 million dollars in winnings for her poetry, including Pulitzers and most recently, a Nobel prize.

Gluck, Pinsky, and Phillips are now all literary prize judges and are deferred to by various cultural fellowships and prizes which they repeatedly award to each other and their inner circle. According to Spahr and Young, the trio “all awarded prizes to a small, overlapping group of poets, many of whom in turn awarded them a prize (or vice versa).”

Aside from being personal acquaintances who lock out everyone else, the literary prize kritarchs prioritize hard left upper class metropolitan politics (feminism, gay activism, Jewish activism, anti-white politics) over all.

The problem is not new. Spahr and Young traced the pattern of historical nepotism back to the Academy of American Poets, which is currently chaired by the Jew Michael Jacobs. The Academy has been making a mockery of the literary prize system for years, with figures like Daniel Hoffman and Stanley Kunitz serving as Chancellors for decades.

The Academy’s selections serve as cues and final appraisals to other institutions. The Academy has awarded 80% of Poet Laureates, 65% of National Book Award winners, and 50% of Pulitzer Prize finalists.

While Spahr and Young note that the winners are often “white” and almost always graduates of a few elite schools (including half who went to Harvard in their sample), a closer reading shows a well-established Jewish network that has succeeded in turning American art and culture into a niche sideshow of propaganda that provides nothing of value to the vast majority of people.

(Republished from National Justice by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Academia, Jews 
Hide 34 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. BuelahMan says:

    Every. Single. Time.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  2. The same mechanism is used in the university system to create new disciplines such as climate science.

    A bunch of people get together and declare a new field. They give each other PhD’s in this burgeoning new scientific classification and they become the experts. These people, the high priests of their ‘profession’, then get novitiates to sit at their feet to “learn” everything there is to know and the scam spreads.

    They produce papers that prove nothing. They invent theories and then more theories based on the previous theories as though they’ve been proven and get grants to further their “research”. It’s one giant swindle when a discipline can just spout their opinions and never have to prove, via empirical experiments, that what they say is based upon verifiable fact.

    • Replies: @MarkU
    , @Colin Wright
  3. Louise Gluck won the last literature Nobel prize. There were several well known candidates who are important and great writers but none of them won the prize (for instance Jonathan Franzen). She is apparently well known in the US but practically unknown outside.

    Even German literature critics who know American literature hadn’t heard of her. I thought that one of those literature critics, a woman, would agree with the prize for her, but her comment consisted in reading one poem by Louise Gluck showing how ridiculous it was. It looked like poems that pupils in high school might write (actually some students that I know wrote very very good poems).

    If an American poet should have won the prize, it’s difficult to think that it’s not Gary Snyder who is already 90 years old. The fact that he didn’t win the prize shows that the prize isn’t very much worth, besides the million dollars that they pay.

  4. Rahan says:

    Thank you for the good work, Mr. Striker!

  5. anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:

    provides nothing of value to the vast majority of people.

    Pretty much the case. Good thing is that the vast majority of people pay no attention to this garbage. However, it’s a model for other areas of activity. It’s why some authors are constantly pushed and hailed as great writers, thinkers, etc. It’s why the same old commentators, neo-cons and others in the opinion business always get a media platform and have a lock-hold on media sponsored opinion. It’s all a closed circle.

  6. This is only the tip of the iceberg. With Zionists owning the Associated Press, Reuters, the New York Times and countless other media outlets, expect more of the same from the “Chosen” ones!

    • Agree: mark green
  7. MarkU says:

    I agree with you on most matters but you are wrong about climatology and the greenhouse effect. The fossil fuel industry and the corporate media have done a very effective job of sowing misinformation, it is hardly surprising that so many people have been taken in. Unless you have a good grounding in the natural sciences it is very hard to identify the deception.

    Consider ‘Climategate’, everyone has heard of that but just like ‘Russiagate’ the actual details are missing. I challenge you (or anyone else reading this) to provide anything other than vague accusations regarding ‘Climategate’.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  8. chuckywiz says:

    So what is new? Thanks for starting a debate.
    What about academy awards? same story.
    And dont forget Nobel Peace. Elie Wiesel? Mala, the girl from Pakistan, Sadaat, Prime Minister Begin (former terrorist involved in blowing up King David Hotel).

    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
  9. @MarkU

    The emphasis is on CO2, a minuscule trace gas. Water vapor is much more potent as a greenhouse gas and much more available in the atmosphere.

    CO2 was chosen to concentrate on because it is plausible and because it is an emission from industrial and transportation processes to be able to point at a bad guy. Trying to paint clouds and rain as a bad guy and expect somehow to make money off the deal just wouldn’t work as it’s too ridiculous.

    Svensmark showed that cosmic rays cause clouds as nucleation sites. Recent papers have shown that CO2 is self limiting in its heating effect and we’ve already hit all it’s capable of doing.

    Records indicate that CO2 lags the increase in temperature by about 800 years. Temperature increases first and then CO2 follows. The global warming stopped almost 2 decades ago. That’s why it became climate change as opposed to global warming because the scam needed to be updated to reflect reality.

    NASA and many other players have warned that a Grand Solar Minimum has started. Historic records indicate that this leads to severe cooling.

    The models produced by the climate scientist frauds have never produced a reliable result even when trying to model historic data to produce what we know actually happened.

    So, tell me why I should believe a word of what those frauds say.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @obwandiyag
    , @Bert
  10. @RoatanBill

    I think that global warming is not caused by CO2; it is caused by ozone holes punched into the upper atmosphere, holes punched, not by CFCs, but by atmospheric nuclear testing. I did not make this up. Somebody else said it. And it sounded reasonable to me. Nuclear bombs are nasty things, I hear.

  11. @UncommonGround

    “If an American poet should have won the prize, it’s difficult to think that it’s not Gary Snyder who is already 90 years old.”

    Yes, but is he circumcised?

    • Agree: UncommonGround
  12. Literary Awards? Are/were they ever credible? Think of them as a fashion statement with all the enduring value of the latest fashion.

  13. Well, who cares?

    Art and literature are dead.

  14. Bert says:

    The largest problem with the global warming hypothesis is that it is not put into temporal context. 8K years ago the Earth’s temperature was higher than at present. Ignoring this, many adherents of the hypothesis (fact to them) adduce current biological events as effects of warming, and therefore as evidence of warming’s reality. For example, the worldwide epidemics of chytrid fungus infection in Anura (frogs) is said to have occurred because of warming. It’s much more likely that the chytrid pandemic was caused by ecotourists and biologists transporting chytrid fungal spores to remote areas on their boot soles. Why didn’t chytrids go pandemic 8K years ago?

  15. If you can, read a copy of Publisher’s Weekly. You’ll need a strong stomach for what you’ll read there.

  16. El Dato says:

    From the Chosen Ones to the Self-Chosen Ones.

  17. @UncommonGround

    What’s ridiculous is that there is even a prize for literature at all.

  18. Chensley says:

    Makes you wonder about other fields. Charities, research funding, etc.

  19. This is similar to how Jeffrey Epstein established his legitimacy to meet top academics, paying donations with stolen mossad money to a university who he then lists on his resume…

  20. Franz says:

    Now we know why most Americans don’t bother with literature. Especially poetry.

    But if the current hammerlock were to lift, would they? Makes one wonder if we’d have a Golden Age if we could write about what matters again.

    Don’t forget the music biz is just as hopeless.

    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
  21. @chuckywiz

    Yeah, and isn’t O-bomb-ya a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize?!

    These awards are all “awarded” by members of the “in-crowd” to members of the “in-crowd.”

  22. @Franz

    “Now we know why most Americans don’t bother with literature. Especially poetry.”

    About poetry: I’ve always thought that most “poetry” is self-indulgent, intellectually-deficient bullshit written by people who can’t support themselves.

    The “United States Poet Laureate”? Do you know who it is? (I don’t.) Do you care? (I don’t.) Does this have any bearing on your life? (Not on mine.)

    • Agree: RoatanBill
    • Replies: @Franz
  23. @RoatanBill

    ‘The same mechanism is used in the university system to create new disciplines such as climate science…’

    Shall we discuss modern art?

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  24. Franz says:
    @Orville H. Larson

    The “United States Poet Laureate”? Do you know who it is? (I don’t.) Do you care? (I don’t.) Does this have any bearing on your life? (Not on mine.)

    Amazes me actually. I had no idea there was such a thing. So I looked up the details and:

    Begun in 1937, and formerly known as the Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress, the present title was devised and authorized by an Act of Congress in 1985.

    Sounds about right: FDR laid the keel in 1937 and Ronny Reagan added the sail in 1985. Reminds us all that Franklin was a commie and Californians tried to warn the country about Ronny before he got the job. True, congress did the dirty work but either one could have stopped it: Pay for a poet while depression rages (FDR) and industrial off shoring (RR). Madness!

    One look at these hamsters is even more depressing. Go to this link and scroll down for pictures of Our Esteemed Poets Laureates:

    Looks like something you’d scrape up out of a homeless shelter on a bad night.

    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
  25. @Colin Wright

    Modern art is, of course, rubbish, but it hurts no one directly.

    Look at the damage economists (frauds) have done for at least a century with their fiat money out of thin air fetish.

    Look at the damage psychiatry (frauds) has done by prescribing brain scrambling meds (mass shootings) and letting criminals get a pass via diminished capacity nonsense to end up back on the street to commit more offenses.

    Look at the damage to the society in general by the political class, social workers, street cops, the leftists generally that all have degrees from the social sciences, humanities, or none at all.

    The people that run the world are incompetents. They have no definable skill set; they emote, they bullshit, but with authority backed up by some thug with a weapon.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  26. The war against poetry is based on diverting intelligent people away from two towering figures of the twentieth century TS Eliot and Ezra Pound who were—gasp! Horror!—right wing! Hence poetry can never be something an intelligent young person would ever take interest in.

    Seriously, the best contemporary poetry is to be found in Chronicles magazine and Modern Age. It’s pretty good sometimes.

    • Replies: @Happy Tapir
    , @Colin Wright
  27. @Happy Tapir

    It’s amazing how even to this day poetry discourse is mainly about debunking and vilifying the “school” of ts eliot. Nonsense discussions about how Auden’s set were the true inaugurators of modern poetry and such are had. Poetry has been reduced to an ethnic conflict, like everything else in modern culture.

  28. Yes, they capture an industry, promote themselves to the top, and then brag about how accomplished they are and the outsized influence they have on culture. It’s like when they talk about how many Nobel prizes they have won compared to other ethnic groups.

    • Agree: Pheasant
  29. @Happy Tapir

    ‘…Seriously, the best contemporary poetry is to be found in Chronicles magazine and Modern Age. It’s pretty good sometimes.’

    To be frank, with a the exception of a few fragments, poetry simply doesn’t do much for me — any poetry.

    I find it genuinely puzzling. Up to two hundred or so years ago, people obviously liked it — they weren’t all pretending.

    So we changed somehow. Apparently, 1820 Colin actually liked Wordsworth. Not 2020 Colin; it just does nothing for me.

    • Replies: @Happy Tapir
  30. @Colin Wright

    To each xyr own I suppose. 😉. I hate sports, so I guess that tells you a lot about me. Hates sports/likes poetry. Hmm

  31. @Franz

    “Looks like something you’d scrape up out of a homeless shelter on a bad night.”

    I see what you mean.

    Notice how many of these unemployable nonentities live off “fellowships,” “grants,” and the like? They couldn’t feed themselves otherwise.

  32. fnn says:

    Poetry. Here’s a review of a new biography (yet another)of Ezra Pound:

  33. ivan says:

    Thank you. Once I realised how the Jews operated to praise and promote their own, I saved time by not reading their bilge. For example if I recall correctly, some simple-minded authour such as Cynthia Ozick, will be praised mile high as a social observer in the manner of Thomas Hardy or George Eliot, others pick up the chant, soon we’ll have a self-referential coterie praising each other and covering each’s back. They goyim who think that authours such as her are at the height of literary accomplishments, soon get befuddled about what the fuss is about. It takes some years to realise that it was all a charade, and that one would be better off reading Dickens or Melville rather than wasting time on Jew approved authours.

  34. JimDandy says:


    Seriously, though, we all know this is how it works, but all of this detailed proof is really great. Thanks.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Striker Comments via RSS