The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Striker Archive
National Justice Exclusive: Leaked Shell Oil Memo Incentivizes Anti-White Discrimination
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The capitalist embrace of explicitly anti-white policies is accelerating at Shell Oil, which is also a prominent sponsor of Nikole Hannah-Jones’ 1619 Project,

An internal email provided to National Justice from the company’s president Gretchen Watkins titled “The Shell Racial Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Plan” leads with a Black Lives Matter style narrative about the deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Ahmaud Arbery that bares no resemblance to the facts on the ground.

According to the memo, all employees at the company will be obligated to complete White Privilege and anti-racist “intervention” training by 2021. The multi-national has also designated a Diversity & Inclusion Day that will “focus on social justice,” an initiative to increase donations to a variety of leftist groups, and a supply chain policy that racially privileges non-white vendors.

The most extreme new initiative will be in respects to performance metrics. Making an effort to hire fewer white people regardless of merit will now be part of management’s Key Performance Indicator (KPI) score. According to a source with knowledge of Shell’s internal culture, employees are punished or rewarded based on their KPI rating, thus the policy financially incentivizes the racial exclusion of whites.

The document makes it clear that participating in this activism against one’s own race and conscience is not voluntary. Forcing white workers to endure racial abuse and bigotry on the job has become ubiquitous in American life, even in industries not known for being political like big oil.

According to Open Secrets, Shell actually spends most of its political money influencing Republicans, which creates a conflict of interest between anti-white capitalists and the GOP they bankroll. Under Trump, the institutional right has been campaigning against the 1619 Project and Critical Race Theory.

Some smaller Marxist factions have expressed dismay at the eagerness shown by identity-leftists to collaborate with corporations like Shell. Two authors at the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS) wrote a scathing piece about “anti-racist” superstars providing cover for Shell’s highly unethical business deals around the world.

For white working people, the close relationship between big business and a strain of anti-white activism once dismissed as fringe should be a cause for concern.

Royal Dutch Shell, the parent company of Shell Oil, receives close to a billion dollars in federal contracts every year. Technically, Shell’s actions are a gross violation of President Trump’s executive order on Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping. The businesses contracting with the federal government are aggressively defying the order and dismissing it as empty, impossible to enforce electioneering.

(Republished from National Justice by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 16 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Realist says:

    If Whites would stand together…this bullshit would end now.

  2. Oh well, I guess it’s back to CITGO for me.

  3. h/t to WSWS – back in December 2019 they wrote about her Shell Oil connection:

    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/12/18/shell-d18.html

    Hannah-Jones is unsparing in her condemnation of the moral failings of the democratic revolutionaries of the 18th and 19th centuries. She can barely contain her contempt for those who failed to leap out of the historical epoch in which they lived and embrace the rhetoric of 21st century middle-class identity politics. But the unforgiving code of ethics she imposes upon the historic figures of the past does not seem to apply to herself. Her own personal moral compass does not seem to be in working order.

    Shell used Hannah-Jones, who was only too willing to be used, as part of its public relations operation aimed at diverting attention from the company’s crimes as they face fresh exposure. Sponsoring an appearance by Hannah-Jones allows Shell to posture as an intrepid corporate fighter against racism. Moreover, the 1619 Project’s obsessive focus on race conceals the essential economic interests that underlie the business practices of Shell.

    Shell executives obviously sponsored the event in the expectation that endorsement of the 1619 Project would counteract the impact of ongoing lawsuits; and they could not have been disappointed by the results of their investment. Everything went exactly as planned. Shell basked in a moment of public adulation as the event moderator, Melanie Lawson, a local media personality, prefaced her introduction of Hannah-Jones with a shout-out:

    I want to take a moment first to recognize tonight’s presenting sponsor. And you might know this name, it’s a giant in our community, Shell Oil. And if someone is here from Shell Oil will you please stand or wave or all of the above? Do we have some Shell folks? There we go.

    The audience responded with an ovation, in which Hannah-Jones joined in. Lawson continued:

    Yeah, don’t be shy about this. Shell people stand up so we can thank you. We appreciate you. We know this event would not be possible without your very generous donation and we appreciate your continued support of Emancipation Park Conservancy.

    • Thanks: Craig Nelsen
  4. @Realist

    Thank you. Have any other pleasant dreams? Don’t misunderstand me, I agree with you but my comment stands. “Whites”, are clueless to the core.

    • Replies: @Realist
  5. Wyatt says:

    Why are all the anti-racist negresses such ugly hambeasts? It’s not even lipstick on a pig bad. It’s a poorly formed clone of a human with hundreds of missing sequences done by aliens (illegal or otherwise.) Do they just feel the need to go after attractive, successful white people as a way to lash out for their external ugliness?

    • LOL: Clyde
    • Troll: Rosie
    • Replies: @SOS777
  6. Noticing says:

    It’s time to start naming and tracking the folks in executive leadership and on boards of these organizations and looking for patterns.

  7. A decent article for the World Socialist Web Site – for a change.
    It would be nice if the World Socialist Web Site were actually socialist. I’ve been banned for asking how open borders helps workers in their home countries. Did Cesar Chavez and his United Farm Workers support open borders? Did the Soviet Bloc have open borders? Does North Korea have open borders?

  8. Realist says:
    @Dr. Charles. Fhandrich.

    “Whites”, are clueless to the core.

    Too many…but not all.

  9. By following an anti-white reverse racism policy as part of a general divide and conquer strategy, the borg, regime, or whatever you want to call it, has lost the last vestiges of legitimacy. It then becomes more difficult for it to achieve obedience, and corruption also redoubles, since following rules against one’s interest beomes obviously stupid. Meanwhile, the token types and quislings running things will also be less competent, so this will also contribute to and bolster a vicious cycle circling the drain.

  10. SOS777 says:
    @Wyatt

    Lol the alien cloning part got me good…but you are onto something for sure. The difference between BLM black women and Christian, more old fashioned black women is YUUUGE as Trump would say. Here at my college, the BLM type chicks are all morbidly obese and look like a beauty school flunky on LSD did their over-the-top makeup. Then the black girls who go to church and want to be teachers, nurses etc and not “diversity advocates” typically are fit, have normal (non-purple or pink) hair and dress like they respect themselves. Not bad looking at all usually. I guess the BLM chicks know that no white man would ever take them seriously, so they feel like they must work against us lol

  11. Anonymous[161] • Disclaimer says:

    I stand guilty. I am white.

  12. Any woman with hair like that? Automatically discredited. Who do you think you are with your arrogant mane? You are no one. A paper tiger. Anyone could see that. Many will start to.

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  13. @restless94110

    That’s a wig. And I don’t purchase Shell, Pennzoil, or Quaker State products anymore. Assholes. They’ll keep enough Whites around to keep their platforms from blowing up, trust me.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  14. Let them hire on the basis of diversity. If there really were undervalued minority talent lying around unused, then the company’s performance shall be enhanced. If not, then the company will suffer from bad decision making. The market will sort this out. I have a feeling that the promised diversity gravy train will peter out in a few years. Meanwhile, dump your Shell stock if you really believe that diversity training will hamstring the company.

  15. It’s all straight out of the Julius Streicher playbook. The Holocaust Inc. industry naturally recognizes all the patterns in minute detail, which are of course quite obvious, even to a person without a Master’s in Holocaust Studies. Even putting aside all Semitic grievance posturing, the pattern is broader, you can see it in Japanese newspapers from the 1920s. It always ends only one way.

    Our Greatest Ally knows exactly how the pattern runs; yet they are not only mysteriously silent about it, indicating a preference for self-interst rather than principle. But they are downright jolly about it, and in fact they are its principal architects.

  16. @Jim Christian

    That’s a wig.

    Wigs don’t start that far back on the forehead.

    But come to think of it, what is with all of these nasty demons and their super receded hairlines?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Striker Comments via RSS