The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Striker Archive
National Justice Exclusive: Leaked Images from Paypal Seminar Reveals Explicit Racial Bias Against White Customers
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Paypal is a prominent example of monopoly capital. Like most Silicon Valley tech firms, they like to keep their terms of service as opaque as possible.

Even more shrouded in secrecy is how decisions to discriminate against customers is made, and who makes them.

Leaks provided to National Justice from a private Paypal seminar conducted over Zoom provides some clues.

In the above slide, Paypal lists targets for censorship. Some noteworthy categories are “White Advocacy,” something vaguely described as “Hate Event Involvement” (suggesting they target individuals, not actions on their platform), “Prejudiced News/Commentary,” Holocaust “denial,” and even views critical of mass immigration.

The majority of Americans are guilty of at least one of these thought-crimes, which makes one wonder who can even use this service.

Some categories discriminate against customers based on race (“white advocacy”), while gray areas abound regarding what exactly constitutes prejudiced news, hate or religious intolerance.

So then what entity decides who gets access to online money transfers and who doesn’t?

According to another slide, this work is deferred to the Jewish organization the Anti-Defamation League, a group funded by the Democracy Alliance called Color of Change, the FBI’s Civil Rights Division, Scotland Yard and others.

Government and non-governmental organizations are both presented as “external partners” helping make decisions on what political views and personalities are allowed.

The ADL and the FBI have been busy deplatforming dissidents. According to another training slide,1800 accounts for individuals, non-profits and businesses in the last year have been eliminated for political reasons using guidelines provided by their “partners.”

65% were for what they categorize as white nationalist activity, while the next most censored group is people and organizations who advocate for immigration restrictions. A person cannot support Donald Trump’s winning issue from his 2016 campaign and still keep their Paypal, in other words. There is even a category for “prejudiced academic work.”

The company goes on to give specific examples to train censors in spotting ideas and individuals that must be silenced.

Most of the individuals and groups mentioned are not particularly radical, much less violent or dangerous.

The Proud Boys, Stefan Molyneux, Gemma O’Doherty, and Katie Hopkins all have fairly mainstream conservative political views, showing just how little freedom of expression is allowed in America today.

The only left-wing extremist on this list is Matthew Rupert, who also happens to be the only one who engaged in illegal activity. Rupert is an anarchist criminal who went to a Black Lives Matter protest and handed out explosives for people to use in terrorist acts.

The way everyone except for Rupert is characterized on this chart shows the power of extremely prejudiced sources, like the Anti-Defamation League. The ADL is an espionage and influence organization that operates on behalf of the state of Israel.

The president and CEO of Paypal, Dan Schulman, is himself Jewish and eager to work with the ADL.

China and the Chinese Communist Party — who conservatives sometimes like to blame for the censorship — is not mentioned anywhere on these slides.

Trump’s executive order on tech censorship has had no effect whatsoever even as a deterrent. Silicon Valley and various Jewish groups have responded to it by doubling down and intensifying their attempts to control what we can see, say, read and do.

(Republished from National Justice by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Ideology • Tags: ADL, Censorship, Jews, Paypal, Political Correctness 
Hide 15 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. The “white quilty” deeply rooted in our thinking. We don’t see it in our behavior.For example this article has to prove (by giving a link) how the leftist (Matthew Rupert) indeed is criminal but all the whites do not need any “proof” of their white activity.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  2. kuraudo says:

    what the hell? Everything they claim about black racism is actually applied to whites. Doesn’t this violate laws? What the hell!

  3. ATBOTL says:

    We should start using “white advocacy” more. It sounds moderate and reasonable. It’s hard to justify opposing the right to advocate for your own ethnic group and normie whites will see this as a double standard.

    • Agree: Rosie, ben tillman, MrVoid
  4. @Ͳommy Ͳurmoil

    Censorship by big tech should be the basis for trust-busting.

    If they are big enough to censor, they are big enough to be broken into a thousand pieces.

    • Agree: Fox
  5. Good article! The enemies of Free Speech are busy!

    It’s interesting to note that Paypal was founded by ‘German, conservative, gay, libertarian’ Peter Thiel. Today–like the rest of Silicon Valley–Paypal’s various sucker punches are directed in one direction under the auspices of one fanatical tribe. The political noose is tightening.

    PS- Boycott Paypal.

    • Agree: Katrinka
  6. Koko says:

    When digital currencies appear soon Paypal re-purpose its existence. It may disappear in five years because no one will need Paypal because no one really like Paypal. We will all be our own bank and send and receive money instantly with out personal pay id. No need for a bank account when you are your own banker. And no need to Paypal cuz the company is a corporate wanker.

  7. fondolo says:

    WHy doesn’t Peter Theil start a new Paypal. Surely he couldn’t have a permanent non-compete agreement. He sold out in 2002. It seems like money lying on the ground. Half of America hates Paypl already or would if fully informed.

    • Replies: @fnn
    , @Anonymous
  8. Exile says:

    The evidence against PayPal would be sufficient to uphold a case for civil rights violations under Title VII were these laws actually enforced on behalf of Whites.

    It is unfortunately an unwritten rule in law that they are not, as James O’Keefe recently publicized.

    The most recent precedent setting cases regarding “reverse discrimination” are years-old and reflect a trend in the courts to utterly bow to the narrative of “Whites can’t be victims of racism b/c power group” that’s been pushed by Jews in Woke Academia and the media in recent years. This is in complete contradiction to the plain language of the statutes as well as the intent of Congress but the recent SCOTUS decision on Title VII shows that this Court is no less politicized, activist or “conservative” than every other past Court, GOP vote-wrangling propaganda notwithstanding.

    Cases should still be brought and publicized to help raise awareness in the White community among those who still believe, somehow, that if Whites were being victimized by discrimination that the legal system would be doing something about it.

    We have a “cui bono” legal system in civil rights law as well as 1A law, criminal prosecution for political offenses and civil unrest (RAM, Proud Boys, ignoring Antifa and BLM offenses) and Whites need to understand how far the reality lies from their comfy illusions about equality and rights which are being propagandized this weekend.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Rosie
  9. fnn says:

    He’s probably afraid of the ADL and its allies.

  10. El Dato says:

    “Offensive Activity: Organized and Raised Money”

    I realize these slides are made under pressure by some sub-intelligent NPC and an unpaid intern, but that’s still crass.

    Meanwhile you can send gibs to random blacks via Venmo (which is PayPal):

    Venmo reparations? Satire merges with reality as white Americans offload their guilt by paying Juneteenth ‘tips’

    PayPal btw is a scam. They have worse exchange rates than VISA.

  11. Anonymous[334] • Disclaimer says:

    Peter Thiel is not pro-White. He is explicitly anti-White. He is directly involved with israeli agent Yoram Hazony and his kosher front “National Conservatism”. Eric Striker, Hunter Wallace, AmRen, and the FTN podcast have all done good work exposing “National Conservatism” and its subversive agenda to direct nationalist energies into maintaining israel’s meatshield and tax farms.

    • Agree: Nuncle
  12. Rosie says:

    The most recent precedent setting cases regarding “reverse discrimination” are years-old and reflect a trend in the courts to utterly bow to the narrative of “Whites can’t be victims of racism b/c power group” that’s been pushed by Jews in Woke Academia and the media in recent years.

    Even though Whites are all-powerful racists, our homelands are up for grabs. Funny that. It would seem that we would have to be either:

    (1) powerless to stop it, or
    (2) not racist.

  13. On Jewish nationalism practiced on United States soil:

    “From the colonial period…(to the present)… Jewish education has at­tempted to parallel and complement the American ed­ucational system and to create lasting institutions that preserve and sustain Jewish life as a vital force for the next generation.”

    Jews may indoctrinate their offspring in Jewish nationalism without penalty, but white advocacy is discriminated against.

    Ethno-Nationalism for me, but not for thee.

    • Agree: mark green
  14. gregor says:

    This is a great scoop by Striker. I mean, I think we already knew this instinctively, but it’s good to have it confirmed.

    The key thing here is that they are just straight up shutting down their enemies with little pretense. Once they infer that you are their enemy, you get shut down. Those are the real terms of service.

    This is something that the guys that obsess over “optics” and “tone” have always missed. The real thing that gets them exercised is not “tone.” It’s actual ideas and concepts and information. No matter how politely you advocate for immigration restriction, as long as you communicate that position effectively they will target you as an enemy.

    Another key point is that there’s usually more emphasis on the right about free speech than with financing but the financing issue is probably the bigger problem. If a book gets banned from Amazon for example, often the material will still get spread online around but it will be very hard to make any money off it. One thing they’ve done very effectively is make it very difficult for the right to pool resources or coordinate in any way.

    • Agree: Nuncle
  15. Remrep says:

    Showed this to some friends. I quite like how theyre being open about it now, although only to their staff. Once they get exposed and forced to own openly anti-White positions, more people will realize it’s moral to fight against Anti-White institutions and corporations.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Striker Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?