The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Striker Archive
Italy: Facebook Forced to Pay Restitution to Italian Nationalists It Deplatformed
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In September of last year, the Zionist social media page Facebook engaged in electoral meddling by arbitrarily banning the large accounts of radical nationalist parties Forza Nuova and CasaPound.

In a rare victory for free speech in the West, Judge Stefania Garrisi found that Facebook had violated the rights of CasaPound in civil court in early December. Mark Zuckerberg’s behemoth has not only been legally compelled to reactivate CasaPound’s page (which has 100s of thousands of followers), but compensate them with 800 Euros for every day they were banned and pay their €15,000 in lawyer fees.

Roberto Fiore of Forza Nuova is hoping to get a similar ruling next week, in line with this precedent.

In America, where dissidents have no practical free speech rights, people are banned every day from internet platforms with no reason given. There are few solutions to this problem since much of the cyber real estate online is run by a small group of monopolies and their oligarchic shareholders, who openly bribe US politicians and think-tanks on the left and right.

This extends beyond social media. This publication has come under attack recently by tech moguls, who by and large do not respect freedom of the press. We have appealed the complaints and are awaiting a response.

Currently, the debate on internet free speech is trapped in a “kosher sandwich.” Last Sunday, the Zionist hardliner Sacha Baron Cohen used his appearance at the Golden Globes to attack Facebook for not doing enough to ban imaginary “racists” and “anti-Semites” on the highly censored platform. This is in line with a speech Cohen gave at the last Anti-Defamation League conference claiming that Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg are allowing nationalists to use their services.

Looking at legal documents and statements Facebook and its lawyers have made on the Italian ruling, the concerned Cohen vs free speech absolutist Zuckerberg “debate” is a fraud. Zuckerberg’s company is vowing to appeal and will bitterly fight for its right to censor political speech.

According to Zuckerberg’s representatives, CasaPound and Forza Nuova, two legal political parties that have held political offices, are “dangerous organizations” due to the fact that they “celebrate Mussolini,” which Silicon Valley says violates their rules. Other reasons Facebook lists for banning these two groups: images of members Roman saluting, promoting “hate” against protected (non-European) groups, “threats” to violent anarchist groups and the use of “banned symbols,” like the Celtic Cross or Fasces, perhaps even the party flags themselves.

When Italian reporters pressed Facebook on what specifically these organizations could do to obey the rules, representatives for the company refused to give any specifics, saying that they don’t want CasaPound and FN to be able to “evade” bans.

Tech companies keep their terms of service vague on purpose because the point isn’t to censor obscenity, slurs or even “hate speech,” it is to block anti-establishment politicians around the world from being able to campaign fairly. In Europe, this is especially a big problem because many groups Jewish billionaires in California believe should not have a right to run for office are actually electorally competitive in the proportional representation system.

In America, millions of people are concerned about online censorship, but the outrage has been largely suppressed by conservative outlets with the exception of Tucker Carlson’s nightly program. Last October, Donald Trump and Mark Zuckerberg met for a private dinner organized by Peter Thiel, and the president hasn’t touched upon the issue disproportionately impacting his supporters much since then. So far, the only substantial challenge to this systematic meddling is Democratic Presidential contender Tulsi Gabbard’s pending lawsuit.

For all the talk of Italian corruption, this appears to be the first time a judge in a neo-liberal plutocracy has swung their gavel in favor of grassroots patriots against the tyranny of big tech. Let’s see if Facebook is able to affirm its “right” to control who can or cannot campaign for office in foreign lands on appeal.

(Republished from National Justice by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy, Ideology • Tags: Censorship, Facebook, Italy 
Hide 4 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. This still isn’t much of a victory. A true victory would not only allow these parties a viable public platform from which to broadcast their ideas, but they would also be able to so on a medium that is itself an instrument of Zionists, self-destructive leftists, and American neocons.

  2. Anonymous[193] • Disclaimer says:

    Mark Zuckerberg’s behemoth has not only been legally compelled to reactivate CasaPound’s page (which has 100s of thousands of followers), but compensate them with 800 Euros for every day they were banned and pay their €15,000 in lawyer fees.

    That’s it? Nothing in the form of punitive damages? If Jewkenberg is allowed to directly influence European political outcomes at these prices, the continent is doomed.

  3. Vespasian says:

    well, this is what happens when you put jews in control of ANYTHING. A simple idea like Facebook, where people could go and post/trade information about themselves, their businesses and so on, has turned into a massive war. The jews turn every single thing in life into a war because they’re a war cult. Jews have evolved this way for centuries and creating conflicts of every stripe imaginable is IN THEIR GENES! Not only can they not be at peace, but jews figured out a system of profiting from every conflict they create.

  4. De-platforming in the name of political censorship should be made unlawful across Western countries.

    This should be the basis of a global class action, requiring facebook, paypal, youtube, twitter and others guilty of de-platforming to pay restitution to political victims of censorship.

    Western governments should set up watchdog agencies to monitor compliance.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Striker Comments via RSS
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings