The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Striker Archive
Is Corbyn the Lesser Evil?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Once upon a time I had a debate with a number of nationalists over the prospect of America’s first black president in 2008. A number of acquaintances demanded everyone vote for “the white guy,” John McCain, whose 36 year long career as top traitor in Congress was finally brought to an end when Satan appointed him Secretary of State in 2018.

The logic was that Barack Obama was going to rule like Robert Mugabe, bring back Southern Reconstruction except this time for all white people, and launch nuclear missiles at Europe (someone actually suggested this). But to this day, the closest America has come to giving amnesty to every illegal immigrant within our borders was when McCain teamed up with Bush in 2007 for “immigration reform,” only for the bill to fail when a Democrat killed it via poison pill. Knowing what we knew about John McCain even back then, it would’ve been impossible for America to have survived 8 years of his presidency without a world war with Russia, Iran, Syria, Nigeria, or countless other countries he and his boyfriend Lindsey Graham have demanded America bomb as soon as possible in the Senate.

In retrospect, as bad as Obama was (and he was awful), McCain would’ve been much worse. He would’ve provided the GOP enough partisan cover to pass the Gang of 8, his complete lack of regard for American lives and money viz-a-viz Israel would’ve made Trump look like Yasser Arafat, he would’ve unleashed Wall Street on the general public even more than it already does. I didn’t vote for Obama, but I sure am glad he beat McCain.

Talking to friends in Britain, today’s election is stuck is a similar no-win situation. The race is being widely panned as a choice between giving Boris an arm or Corbyn taking a leg. If we adjust the saying to fit some of the election’s themes like terrorism and Israel, its more like either your foreskin or your head.

Anecdotally, nationalists I’ve talked to are split 3 ways: 1/3 won’t vote, 1/3 are pinching their nose for Johnson, 1/3 are choosing the mystery door of Corbyn.

Bottle Blonde John McCain

One critique of Corbyn is that the Cold Warrior (for the other side), if elected, will be privileging BAME’s (a new made up term intended to bloc up non-whites) ahead of whites, unleash a new wave of draconian “hate speech” prosecutions, and invite a flood of mass migration.

They have good reason to believe this. Corbyn in his younger years was a leading organizer in groups like the “Anti-Nazi League,” a precursor to Antifa. He has acquiesced to the metropolitan and wealthy “Blairite” bugmen that have taken his party hostage on immigration and gender ideology, although not completely (the root of their “anti-Semitism” charges). Corbyn wants a second referendum on Brexit.

But Boris Johnson is a proven anti-white demagogue himself.

As Mayor of London (elected in 2008), Boris Johnson cheered the anarchist and communist campaign of terror against elected officials of the British National Party. On his blog, he openly encouraged physical attacks on Nick Griffin in 2009. He personally intervened to ban the BNP from various public events they were entitled to attend.

In 2012, Johnson joined together with open communist Ken Livingstone to “no-platform” BNP candidate Carlos Cortiglia from a BBC Mayoral debate, even though UKIP and Lib Dems had no issue with his presence.

On free speech, we don’t know what Corbyn would do exactly, but we have the documents on the Tories. It was Theresa May who demanded new internet “hate speech” laws. Even May’s conservative equivalents in America have blamed her for the death of free expression in Britain. Corbyn voted for the Investigatory Powers Bill (the most radical attack on civil liberties in modern British history), but the Tories authored it.

Last April, Boris Johnson’s fellow conservative, Sajid Javid, authored an “online harms white paper” proposal that would cluster political speech in with child pornography and appoint a myriad of Jewish and leftist groups to decide what can and cannot be said online. The Guardian, no friend of free speech, went so far as to compare it to “North Korean” style internet regulation.

On immigration, Johnson has always been for open borders. The Conservative Party is notoriously weak on immigration, yet Johnson has historically been extreme even by Tory standards as a standard-bearer for race-replacement. He has gone so far as to say “I am the only British politician who will admit to being pro-immigration” during a time when public support for immigration was souring.

Here, Corbyn, thanks in part to “New Labour” baggage (produced by Tony Blair’s handler, the Jew Peter Mandelson, who is now vocally “NeverCobyn”), refuses to put a ceiling in his manifesto on how many immigrants they will be letting in, but neither will Johnson’s Tories. The Tories have done a masterful job in creating the impression that they oppose immigration during election campaigns without providing substantial policy proposals, much less direct results.

On crime, it’s obvious that Corbyn’s policies will encourage it, but the ongoing black knife-crime crisis has nobody to blame but the Tories.

As Home Secretary, Theresa May oversaw massive budget cuts to British police that lowered their salaries by 20% and heavily discouraged the “stop and search” tactic because it “targeted” blacks. When police officer associations protested and predicted these policy changes would cause the crime rate to spike (and it did), May dismissed them as “racist.”

In other words, when you filter campaign rhetoric out, Labour and Tories are in consensus about these issues. Neither is willing to represent the will of the white majority here.

On foreign policy, Corbyn’s hardline anti-imperialism and non-interventionism (the real reason Jews in Britain hate him) is far more appealing than Boris Johnson, who is a warmongering Zionist neo-con who was trying to encourage Trump into attacking Iran after just two months of being Prime Minister.

On economics, Corbyn’s plan to nationalize vital industries, give employees a reason to work by mandating 10% of business stocks be shared, protect national industry, and decrease the work week to 32 hours are all far superior to Johnson’s neo-liberal capitalist plans to sign a bunch of mini-“NAFTAs”, empower the City of London with tax cuts and deregulation, and erode labor rights in the name of raising the GDP nobody will benefit from but the 1%.

The companies Corbyn wants to nationalize were state-owned until Margaret Thatcher. Water, gas, transportation and telecommunications companies rip British consumers off, outsource jobs, run the companies into the ground, then demand the British taxpayer either bail them out. In many cases, these privatized firms end up being controlled by outsiders by selling their shares to foreign state owned enterprises.

When it comes to Brexit, Johnson claims he will do what the Tories have been promising for four years and finally leave the European Union. Truth be told, Johnson’s post-Brexit proposals are so awful they have made remaining look appealing. It is possible, but unlikely, that Johnson will leave the EU without granting a second referendum just like what Corbyn is campaigning on.

Corbyn is a life long Eurosceptic and has until recently opposed free movement (what British workers are angry about). He was browbeat into taking a more pro-EU stance, but he has not been the pro-EU champion the Brussels wing of British plutocracy thought they had.

Worst of all, Johnson has turned today’s election into a referendum on “anti-Semitism” as much as one on Brexit. A Corbyn victory would splash cold water on Jews, who have elected themselves Royal Guards with the right to veto candidates outside of 10 Downing.

Corbyn’s immigration platform and lack of support for Brexit will destroy him with the white working class, however. While he still has a chance for a last minute comeback, were it not for his stance on these two non-essential, pro-capitalist positions (pro-immigration and being pro-EU), Corbyn’s populist insurrection would’ve won by a landslide.

When weighing all of the above, Corbyn is, like Obama in 2008, the lesser of two evils.

(Republished from National Justice by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 192 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Puffdaddy says:

    well looks like he lost

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Haxo Angmark
    , @Herald
  2. Can’t help but agree with the author. . Even ignoring Policy, Johnson is a vile proposition. A notorious liar, incompetent, a philanderer, a rorter of public money, lazy, superficial, treacherous, arrogant, ” a born-to-rule” egomaniac & as crude as a toilet brush, this man should have no public service role, let alone that of PM.
    But — & I still can’t “get my head around it” this turd of a man appears to have been voted in with a huge majority!
    I could just about understand a small majority, but talk at this point is of Thatcher-like majorities. WHAT ???
    If you didn’t despair of democracy before this, possibly one of the most important post war elections, then what the hell can you think now? That the average citizen is a complete idiot?….willing to be taken in by a cheap charisma & adolescent charm (swarm) ?
    Well, if the huge majority turns out to be true, then the UK voter has NO one to blame except themselves for their (highly probable) SHIT future.

  3. The daily average evilness of the last five years. May the better Brit win.

  4. Smith says:

    He might be the lesser evil but Boris turns out to be the GREATER GOOD.

    Get Brexit Done.

    • Replies: @Thulean Friend
  5. Ross45 says:

    Its not the PM but the party he leads that has all the power. A vote for corbym is a vote for blairite uber remainers and everything that brings.

    I dont like johnson either but i still voted for him as BREXIT is the leading issue that is much more likely to be done under him. Im not sure where you get the idea of a 2nd ref were’re due to come out 31 jan 20!

    All that guess what corbyn is thinking on BREXIT by staying neutral didnt wash, just came across like he’s hiding something.

    Shame being anti establishment might have voted for him if wasnt for that.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  6. Miro23 says:

    I have to agree with all this. Johnson is an ethics free opportunist – the kind that US Neocons love. So they can make friends with Boris the way they made friends with Blair.

    Would Boris Johnson support the Neocons in some fake Iran provocation and Iran war? Sure that he would.

  7. A123 says:

    BoJo may not have deep convictions on policy, but he does want to stay on top.

    This was a “one issue” election, so there is little to no ambiguity for maneuver. The results look like a solid Pro-Brexit majority in Parliment. Now that BoJo has run on “Get Brexit Done”, the only way to keep winning is to deliver. His personal beliefs, if he has any, will remain safely locked away until a clean Brexit finalized and a UK-US bilateral trade deal is running. It is likely that he will be able to quickly generate additional bilateral deals.

    When the citizens of the UK start seeing the economic gains of Brexit, BoJo will earn political capital that he can use on other issues. Only at that point, we will see if he wants to push any policies based on personal convictions.

    PEACE 😇

  8. anonymous[677] • Disclaimer says:

    The British election system tends to exaggerate wins by the party that is clearly ahead, especially in a three or four-party election. Besides the large Tory majority, the Scottish Nationalists gained 48 0ut of 59 Westminster seats in Scotland – perhaps a source of constitutional crisis and another referendum.
    Neither party is as overwhelmingly popular as the seat count might indicate.

  9. Brown boi says:
    @animalogic

    Corbyn is seen as the representative of the foreigners.

    UK whites can still safely channel Nationalist sentiment against other Europeans allowing a coherent identity.

    The plan of the Nationalist left is to renegotiate the UK social contract free of Brussels.

    I assume 5 years for Brexit in totality
    5 for socialists to take over
    5 to implement necessary policies

    By then, America/Israel will completely own the UK.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  10. sally says:

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/12/12/the-real-fbi-scandal-comey-covered-up-trump-ties-to-organized-crime-and-russian-intel/ coverup they say, or business as usual I ask

    Best man won depends on which side of the global fence one is on when on… does it matter? Is it not part of the choreography? The masses are doomed unless they become educated (in a propaganda controlled environment that seeks to deny them an education) and organized under a single banner seeking to give control of their societies back to humanity. The vicious persons that animate the governments that own the humanities in each of our micro societies (the nation states) 8 billion people has long been know. Division of humanity into 206 armed, information controlled nation states has given organized criminals and wealth seeking Oligarchs the use of the top down nation states. These undesirables have used this division of humanity to control their information, and the controlled information, has allowed these undesirables to use humanity by controlling mass behavior and regulating productive outputs. The nation state system is the problem, it has allowed those who use humanity to keep the masses disorganized.

    http://themillenniumreport.com/2019/12/the-hidden-powers-behind-the-destruction-of-america/
    end of America the British vote?

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  11. Kali says:

    Not to mention Corbyns’ suport for Palestine and suport for Assange. Both extremely time-sensitive issues, both now lost to the neocons, neoliberals and Jewish Power.

    The system is rigged and NOBODY gets into power without the support of “the jews” (jewish power)!

    Yesterday, polling day, people were queueing round the block to vote. That is, Labour voters were queueing. I’ve not read much commentary on the polls so far, but innitial exit-polls suggested a Labour win, as did the campains themselves – Bojo running and hiding from the “electorate” whilst folks came out in their thousands to suport Corbyn.

    Even those nuckleheaded Brexiters (and I write as a suporter of exiting the EU – wanting an end to ALL government (in its current form) of course means an end to all centralised power) who mistakenly believe Bojo is gonna “get breshit done” and reduce immigration (because they lack the capasity to read!) can’t account for a Tory win, as the country went to the polls on so many unrelated issues, as outlined in your article, Eric Striker.

    The system is rigged and only a blind man can fail to see that now. But I, sadly, sincerely doubt the weary British public are going to do anything about it. With luck they’ll prove me wrong and burn the lot to the ground, but I wont hold my breath.

    Whilst I realise that violence cannot be, and will not be, the solution – the only way to kill the beast is to starve it – I long to see some spark of life from my fellow Brits… some indication that they are not entirely cowed by the establishment. Unfortunately they really are.

    And so I will go on banging my drum for anarchy, for free, independant, life-afirming movement away from the swamp in which the beast dwells. Some will listen and our numbers will grow… slowly, surely, exponentially, until we reach the tipping point.

    It’s a sad day for Julian, for Palestine and for the millions of working poor/unemployed/disabled/homeless people of Britain. The suicide epidemic is about to reach sickening proportions.

    Sigh,
    Kali.

  12. Z-man says:

    I forget but I saw a stand for The John Birch Society on Fifth Ave. once with a hysterical description of Boris. Something on the line of ‘a mutant inbred part Jew’ or something to that effect, funny.
    And now he’s the British PM, lol!!! The joke may be on the Brits.

    • Replies: @Irish Savant
    , @Daniel Rich
  13. Brexit is essential to the rise of nationalism/populism in Britain, since most people in the UK with nationalist populist views believe (rightly or wrongly) that the EU is a globalist organisation that undermines British sovereignty and prevents Britain determining its own immigration policy. This isn’t a view held by most Continental nationalists. They believe (rightly or wrongly) that it is still possible to push nationalist policies within the EU framework, and many, if not most, think the best strategy is to take over the EU from within.

    This is one of the reasons why British nationalist parties like the BNP have done so poorly in comparison with nationalist parties in Europe. Nationalist leaning UK voters think its a waste of time voting for fringe nationalist/populist parties when Britain is still trapped inside the quasi globalist, anti-democratic EU. Hence, much of the nationalist political energy in Britain over the last three decades has gone into UKIP and Brexit.

    Now that Britain is likely to achieve some kind of Brexit (even if its largely symbolic rather than real) that nationalist populist energy can be refocused on more important matters like combating mass immigration and protecting freedom of speech. Similarly, Tory PMs and Daily Mail pundits can no longer blame the EU for their own failure to deal with such issues.

  14. Dumbo says:

    Well, if the huge majority turns out to be true, then the UK voter has NO one to blame except themselves for their (highly probable) SHIT future.

    That’s true, but who else could they vote for? All alternatives pretty much suck.

    Even the current British Royal Family sucks, not even a return to monarchy would save that country.

    • Replies: @animalogic
  15. MarkU says:
    @animalogic

    I agree with you.

    The remainers on the left have shot themselves in the foot. Instead of accepting the referendum result and making the most of it, they have lumbered us with Boris Johnson for five more years of Tory rule. I have been arguing for years that the killing of a female remainer MP by a right-wing nutter (just before the referendum) cost the leave contingent a large number of votes, without that tragic incident the referendum result would have been far more decisive. By making the election, in effect a second referendum, they chucked an easy win to Boris Johnson.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @james charles
  16. Amon says:
    @animalogic

    Its the UK, a vast colony of pussy whipped gentiles trained to bark at the words communism and anti-semitism.

    • Agree: Realist, Trinity, Rurik
    • LOL: Z-man
    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
  17. Anonymous[399] • Disclaimer says:

    Boris is a liberal, he is basically Tony Blair all over again. He was the clear media favourite and most on the left don’t even seem that disappointed he’s won because he really isn’t all that right wing, certainly not on social issues like immigration and LGBT which are the most important things to the left.

    I think people are in for a shock with Boris, I think he will turn out to be more liberal on some issues than Corbyn would have been.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  18. They are both bad when it comes to domestic policy, but if Corbyn had won. It was have been funny to see the kvetching by the Zionist organisations. It probably would have turned more people on to the Jewish Question as most would be confused what all the fuss was about, after all, literally no one cares about the Israel-Palestine affair so it would undoubtedly be confusing to people why all these Jews are so obsessed with it, and the hoi polloi might have started asking some questions and doing their research.

  19. Eric is right: this was a crap election that the British people couldn’t possibly have won, no matter whom they chose. It was, in short, like so many elections we’ve had in the US through the years. If I could have taken seriously for one minute the idea that Johnson was going deliver a real Brexit, then I could have overlooked his many, many flaws. But since he’s such a pro-establishment twit on every other issue, it’s so hard to imagine him really bucking the establishment on something so important. So the likeliest outcome seems to me like BrINO (Brexit In Name Only), coupled with more austerity. Lose-lose.

    Oh–and to make matters worse: the Zionists win again. Who needs Bibi when you’ve got BoJo!

    In 2012, Johnson joined together with open communist Ken Livingstone to “no-platform” BNP candidate Carlos Cortiglia from a BBC Mayoral debate …

    And ‘Red Ken’ Livingstone later lost his Labour membership for telling the truth about Hitler and the Zionists: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe-CgeCGdl0

    What comes around goes around.

    • Agree: Z-man, Kali, Old and grumpy
    • Replies: @Z-man
  20. Nodwink says:

    If Boris doesn’t seem obsessed with protecting white folk, it may be in part because he is Turkish:
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-leader-turkey/turks-welcome-ottoman-grandson-boris-johnson-as-british-leader-idUSKCN1UJ1E8

    • Replies: @Paul C.
  21. @Dumbo

    “That’s true, but who else could they vote for? All alternatives pretty much suck.”
    The article is about the lesser evil.
    Labour is the lesser evil.
    As a minimum, there could have been a chance that Corbyn could have deviated from 40years of neoliberalism. A bare chance that the NHS might have improved. A bare chance that Israel (& the US) wouldn’t direct policy to the extent that it does now.
    To me, at least, that is a lesser evil — even if Corbyn has the charisma of a hand full of post-it notes.

    • Replies: @Jan Rain
  22. @Amon

    Sounds just a bit like the US.

    • Agree: NoseytheDuke
    • Replies: @Amon
  23. Dumbo says:
    @Brown boi

    UK whites can still safely channel Nationalist sentiment against other Europeans allowing a coherent identity.

    But not again hindus, pakis, caribbean blacks, etc, they are part of the “commonwealth” and will continue coming to London in droves. But according to “conservatives” what the UK needs is to get rid of those pesky eurotrash continentals…

    Good riddance to the UK.

  24. @alt right moderate

    This is one of the reasons why British nationalist parties like the BNP have done so poorly in comparison with nationalist parties in Europe. Nationalist leaning UK voters think its a waste of time voting for fringe nationalist/populist parties when Britain is still trapped inside the quasi globalist, anti-democratic EU. Hence, much of the nationalist political energy in Britain over the last three decades has gone into UKIP and Brexit.

    The BNP platform was very anti-EU so I doubt the reason people didn’t vote for them is because they thought, as you say, that voting for a strongly nationalist party was a waste when still in the EU as a BNP win would hae taken the UK out of the EU either unilaterally or by a referenedum.

    The real reason was that the BNP was perceived as a very racist party which the British public were not keen on. I am pretty sure I recall hearing Farage saying something along the lines of “If you are sick of mass immigration but also can’t stand the racism of the BNP, come to UKIP”. And this worked as 12.5% of voters voted UKIP in 2015 compared to 1.9% of voters voting BNP in 2010. The BNP were absolutely crushed by UKIP who were a BNP-lite. Nick Griffin also made the mistake of standing candidates in almost all constituencies meaning they lost most of the deposits as they didn’t reach the voter-percentage threshold in most seats. They should have focussed on winning a few seats and then causing havok in parliament. Now they are pretty much dead.

    As time goes on an the demographic shift really starts to become noticeable to a lot of people, I reckon more explicitly racist parties will do better, but back in 2010, people still preferred their racism in the form of anti-Islam dog-whistles, not explicitly race based ideology as was the case of the BNP.

    Continental Europeans are also far less cucked than Brits as the latter are English-speaking meaning all the weird Cultural Marxism stuff from the US hits the UK first as well as countries like Canada, NZ and Australia.

    • Replies: @Vaterland
    , @Lurker
    , @Jack744
  25. Dumbo says:
    @MarkU

    have been arguing for years that the killing of a female remainer MP by a right-wing nutter

    False flag / Reichstag fire?

    • Replies: @james charles
  26. Amon says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    Two sides, one coin.

    The elites in both nations have been obsessed with Jewish wealth and power for centuries to the point that they have willingly sold their sons into servitude and given away their daughters as a tribute just to feast on the scraps left behind by the rats.

    In some ways Marx was right, you can’t fix the system if the rot is allowed to remain.

    • Agree: Trinity
  27. John McCain, whose 36 year long career as top traitor in Congress was finally brought to an end when Satan appointed him Secretary of State in 2018.

    That might not be the very best thing I’ve ever read — I’ve been reading for a long time now — but it’s got to be in the top five. Nice.

    • Replies: @Republic
  28. Prior to the election Johnson had a cabinet comprised mainly of “Zionists ” , now that he apparently has a substantial majority in Parliament, will he now give Trump the support that he needs to attack Iran , like the support that Blair gave Bush to attack Iraq . Alarmingly ,US forces have been massing in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere in countries close to Iran . Should we expect another false flag attack to be blamed on Iran?

  29. Brown boi says:
    @Dumbo

    So you think they’ll just reroute immigration to be commonwealth oriented instead of EU + privatize the NHS?

  30. Anonymous[107] • Disclaimer says:

    The motto of the Internet should be barking dogs don’t bite. All bark, no bite. Not only has the Internet not empowered the people, it’s cut them off at the knees at a time when direct action in the streets can still put a stop to the homosexualizing and secularizing NWO and defenestrate the parasitic elites with relative ease.

  31. Z-man says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    We gotta hear from Nigel Farage. If the Brits can’t control their borders in this final deal to get out of the EU then there should be a no deal Brexit or a REVOLUTION.
    The Globalist/Jew power base in the Western World has to be exposed & destroyed.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  32. Vaterland says:
    @alt right moderate

    This isn’t a view held by most Continental nationalists. They believe (rightly or wrongly) that it is still possible to push nationalist policies within the EU framework, and many, if not most, think the best strategy is to take over the EU from within.

    Now that Britain is likely to achieve some kind of Brexit (even if its largely symbolic rather than real) that nationalist populist energy can be refocused on more important matters like combating mass immigration and protecting freedom of speech.

    Unfortunately I believe you will get absolutely nothing from a Johnson government regarding an end to mass immigration, especially of “the darkies” and a protection of freedom of speech. On the contrary. See Trump. And as the man behind Trump is Sheldon Adelson, the man behind Johnson is the man himself: Jacob Rothschild.

    Fundamentally what British Brexiteers do not understand, or consciously support, is the new paradigm of our age: a new Cold War between (German and French led) continental Europe, plus Russia and partially China, against the US led global empire of Neo-Liberalism and the Neocons. Again Zbigniew Brzezinski: Eurasia vs USA and the oceans. As an example, the current US sanctions against Northsream 2 also fall under this new development. And as Henry Kissinger rightly said: “Globalization is just another word for Americanization”.

    For years I have read the demagoguery against Europe, the EU and Germany from the British and US press. And the intention is quite clear. The main accusations, especially by people like Nigel Farrage are: 1.) It is the EU that caused the New Cold War. 2.) It is dominated, even oppressed by Germany. 3.) Merkel caused the refugee crisis and we need to get away from “Hippie-Germany” to protect our nation.

    But let’s get a reality check on these points:
    1.) The USA was the sole superpower, its policies since over a century are focused at attaining and maintaining this position. The World Wars included. The US establishment believes to have won the Cold War and the US model and dominance characterize the end of history for the globe. In this regard all this “JQ” stuff is a complete distraction. There’s actually been a stringent continuation of US foreign policy for a very, very long time; albeit radicalized by the Neocons and Trumpism. “America first” is what the USA has always done. The confusion comes when the disenfranchised majority believes, their particular interests were the interests of the Empire, because of “democracy”. And in this regard the European Union is an emerging competitor, that is either hated, demonized or ridiculed.

    2.) I am not sure, if anyone is ignorant to fall for this, but unfortunately it seems so. Explaining the actual mechanisms of EU policy making would take too long for this already very long reply. But is it Germany that has 200 military bases globally, in almost all countries? Which has a military budget exceeding the rest of the world combined? With thousands of nuclear weapons? But no, of course: 80 million small Germany with few natural resources, a nightmarish geo-political position, no nuclear weapons and a currently weak army is oppressing the member states in a political union in which all heads of states have to agree unanimously on policies to be implemented.

    3.) The reply to this is rather simple: the refugee crisis was primarily caused by Neocon Wars against Syria, Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan. Wars by the USA under Israeli and some Saudi lobby influence. Wars in which the UK has played an almost slavishly loyal role to the Neocons where it were Germany and France, especially Gerhard Schröder, which had put up some resistance. And thus, a vote for the Tories and Johnson was a vote for the primary causes of the refugee crisis. And maybe the next one, too, if we get the war against Iran under Trump in his 2nd term, supported by Johnson.
    It’s true that Angela Merkel is one of the worst, if not the worst chancellor of my country since the end of WW 2. Among the primary reasons are the dominance in Berlin and of Merkel by: trans-Atlantic think tanks, lobbyists and NGOs; prominently among them the Jewish Lobby (Neocons included); fundamentally the USA and an historically fueled identity politics matrix that also comes from the USA and its cultural industry, intellectuals and mass media. The ‘swamp creatures’ in Washingtong and Berlin are also largely interchangeable. — Not to forget the ‘reeducation’ of (West-)Germany primarily by the USA and the UK, which also strengthened the march through the institutions by the radical new left since 1968 and was largely funded, staffed, supplied and ideologically filled by (Jewish) intellectuals from the USA. Germany, in its current liberal-left wing form, is almost exclusively a product by the USA and Britain; thus blaming the fallout of such policies for Britain and the USA on Germany is doubly perfidious. It’s no coincidence that East Germany, which was occupied by Russia and communist, is the last bastion of the ‘right’ and ‘nationalism’ today. The Anglosphere is the reason for our situation today, not Germany.

    Now for Britain and the “globalist” EU: What’s the current situation in the UK?
    1.) Its hate speech laws are the most draconian in Europe, even ahead of my own country, and it’s the one state where the accusation of an anarcho-tyrannical police state actually sticks.
    2.) It is the “most loyal partner of the USA”, meaning: “the most useful butt-goy for Neocon Wars.” And maybe the only country in Europe that is more dominated by the Lobby than even Germany and France. The current election was a great example. IF there will be a war against Iran, I see only one European country going along with it: the UK.
    3.) ‘Anglo-Saxon style capitalism’ with all that it entails culturally and socially, is, I think rightly, seen by many continental nationalists as a core scourge of globalization. Supporting it is treason to your people and one of THE reasons why I think that UK nationalism is utterly fake and perfidious. Brexit under the Tories is the return of Margaret Thatcher, at best. And if you have any idea about politics, you know what this means.
    4.) Concerning the issues that right-wingers hate, Britain is significantly to the liberal-left of the EU average and even official media campaigns: LGBTQ and interracial propaganda; raceless, capitalist civic “nationalism”; non-European immigration and immigrant worship; anti-white mainstream culture which is also spread by tax funded state media like the BBC; hate speech laws; the “bomb the world and invite the world” politics. One can even make the case that the UK and especially the USA are the dominant factor for the EU adopting these media campaigns and policies. The UK Brexiters already accused the EU of being too white and racist, even now. And the USA would do the same, if it adopted a pan-European Fortress Europe policy.

    There is only one realistic, albeit small, chance for any form of truly European independence in an Age of Empires: a united Europe. And any European country will have more influence on its own matters as a part of the EU, than as a client state of the USA or China. Now an actually conservative Britain, on the line of let’s say Viktor Orban who is in fact so “pro EU” he even called himself for a European Army https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6gt4qnkpms , would have made an impact to push the EU towards a more conservative line. But out and “cucked” by the EU in the negotiations, it has absolutely no impact on the character of the EU anymore and it’s rather an off-putting example for nationalism. It’s one of the many reasons why the anti-EU and anti-EURO AfD is stuck at 15%. And as stated, the fact is: even the reality of British nationalism is to the liberal-left of the EU average.

    • Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  33. Owen C. says:

    At this stage, “get Brexit done” is basically Johnson’s version of “strong and stable”.

  34. @Smith

    Brexit only means more pakis. Boris Johnson is on record, multiple times, of supporting amnesty for largely non-European immigration.

    The browning of Britain would happen even faster under a Brexit Britain, as European immigration would be supplanted by commonwealth (read: Paki, Nigerian, Bangladeshi etc) migration.

    Brexit voters are idiots for the most part.

    • Replies: @eah
    , @Smith
  35. Vaterland says:
    @Just passing through

    The huge difference is: a Brexit under the BNP could have meant something and prevented the UK to entirely fall victim to the global Ziocon Empire. And Farrage actually said that more black people will be able to come to Britain thanks to Brexit. Brexit isn’t for you, if you dislike the darkies. It’s true of course that Griffin was a failure. The right is plagued with terrible politician material, lack of funding and ideological adaptation since decades; the infiltration by the agencies is just the cherry on top. And what we got now: the civic nationalist, Neocon/Zionist, neo-liberal capitalist “nationalism” is a Frankstein monster synthesis of the worst elements of politics. And its worst example might be the Tories in Britain.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  36. The lesser of two evils is still evil. There is no left/right, only Us and Them…

    • Agree: Trinity
  37. @Dumbo

    I am beginning to question national IQ scores and their importance, I suppose they are important when it comes to pattern recognition and logic, but they seem to be useless when it comes to inferring things from large amounts of information.

    You can still see a lot of the people on the Daily Mail comments sections rejoicing at the results of the elecion and how “the points-based system” for immigration will end the era of mass immigration. Little do they know Australia has a points based system and their per capita immigration rate is much higher than the UK, Boris also shamelessly lied a few weeks ago about net immigration being 50-50 EU/non-EU when it is in fact heavily in favour of non-EU which the UK has always had control over.

    There are still people going on about refugees when the UK doesn’t even have a refugee problem and there are hardly any of them here.

    The UK voted for Blair 3 times in a row, it truly doesn’t deserve to survive as a nation.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  38. A few points…

    1) Don’t think that Boris would need to twist the arm of the Orange Cockatoo in the White House (or tickle a beak if you will) to bomb and destroy Iran… he would love to do it, for that will guarantee that he will finally become a genuine billionaire after he leaves office (there are those who doubt that he really is one presently) but he needs to be reelected first.

    2) So if Corbyn and Johnson are both bad for the White majority then why do they get elected time and again… if the majority is so lackadaisical in safeguarding its own very interests then who can help them… the 1/3 won’t vote, 1/3 will want “the antisemitic” commie and the last 1/3 will want the bruiser Boris and that says it all.

    3) The corpulent Vicky was handed the crown and title of Empress of India by none other than the old Jew Benny Disraeli and now you’re looking for independence from Israel and Jews… you, the White Sepoys, may have gotten the impression that the old debt had been paid with the Balfour Declaration and subsequent establishment of the state of Israel but you forget the interest on interest, the compound obligation of neo-slavery!

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Daniel Rich
  39. Boris Johnson is a three dollar whore for the JEW/ENGLISH ruling class of England.

    Boris Johnson pushes mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders.

    Boris Johnson is a poodle boy puppet whore for the plutocrats and globalizers in the JEW/ENGLISH ruling class of England.

    Boris Johnson is an evil and immoral globalizer who is dedicated to using WHITE GENOCIDE immigration policies to completely and totally destroy the True Core English people.

    Boris Johnson is a chubby politician whore of the type who immediately exchanges their three dollar fee for a bit of booze or some cheap drugs.

    Boris Johnson and Dave Cameron and Theresa May are three Tory peas in a pod when it comes to whoring themselves out to the JEW/ENGLISH ruling class of England. Boris Johnson and Dave Cameron and Theresa May all push nation-wrecking mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders.

    Trump is a three dollar whore for Jew Bolshevik Mass Immigration Extremist Shelly Adelson, but Boris Johnson is just slightly more of a politician whore than Trump is.

    Trump and Boris Johnson are three dollar whores for Bolshevik Jew Globalizers who push mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders.

    I hereby challenge three dollar whores Trump and Johnson to a debate on mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and national identity and monetary policy and trade policy and foreign policy and health care and the student loan debt bomb and any other damn thing.

    Boris Johnson and Donny Trump are cowardly politician whores who do the bidding of evil BOLSHEVIK JEW GLOBALIZER DONORS.

    Tweet from 2015:

  40. It boils down to the professional people pimps called Labor lost the actual indigenous laborers they claim to represent. Yesterday the working man voted once again for Brexit. I suspect those voters know the Tories will screw them over. Yet it’s a step up from the traitors who have made it lucrative careers betraying you.

    Plus I think everyone everywhere is sick of being lectured to by rich, sanctimonious celebrities.

  41. Boris Johnson is a politician whore for the evil and immoral JEW/ENGLISH ruling class of England.

    Boris Johnson is a complete and total stooge whore for Jews Organized Globally — or JOG.

    Boris Johnson answers the JEW QUESTION by asking Jews Organized Globally what he should do.

    Globalization and financialization and foreign policy debacles such as the Iraq War pushed by Jews Organized Globally brings up the JEW QUESTION.

    The JEW QUESTION explained:

    Jews form a nation within a nation everywhere they reside. Can Jews ever be considered to be part of the larger nation in which they reside when they are genetically and culturally predisposed to put the interests of the Jew Nation over and above the interests of the larger nations in which they reside?

  42. Realist says:
    @Puffdaddy

    The important issue for the UK is will Brexit be honoured.

  43. eah says:

    Maybe.

    link

    The interracial sex wing of the right (conservatives) will declare Corbyn’s defeat a victory against “socialism” and “anti-Semitism.”

    What really happened is Corbyn lost white workers thanks solely to positions Soros Youth compelled him to take on Brexit, homos and immigration.

    Note the below election day tweet from the ‘conservatives’.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Trinity
  44. Realist says:
    @animalogic

    Well, if the huge majority turns out to be true, then the UK voter has NO one to blame except themselves for their (highly probable) SHIT future.

    Sounds like the US.

  45. eah says:
    @Thulean Friend

    Brexit only means more pakis. Boris Johnson is on record, multiple times, of supporting amnesty for largely non-European immigration.

    Yes, nothing significant will change: the UK will remain on course to make its native population a minority in 3 birth-to-adulthood generations or so — at the moment, it’s hard to see a path away from that via voting in any western country.

    Brexit voters are idiots for the most part.

    Not really — just stuck voting for the ‘lesser of two evils’ when faced with an ‘evil of two lessers’ kind of non-choice.

    link

    We Were Never Asked

  46. Realist says:
    @Really No Shit

    So if Corbyn and Johnson are both bad for the White majority then why do they get elected time and again… if the majority is so lackadaisical in safeguarding its own very interests then who can help them… the 1/3 won’t vote, 1/3 will want “the antisemitic” commie and the last 1/3 will want the bruiser Boris and that says it all.

    There are too many dumbass Whites in the UK and US.

  47. Israel’s fifth column delivered another stunning blow to world democracy and peace yesterday.

    • Agree: theMann
    • Replies: @NegroPantera
  48. Republic says:
    @Reactionary Utopian

    A good decision by the Prince of Darkness

  49. eah says:

    OT

    If you think the UK has problems (they do) …

    link

    You wanna know what the feminist government of young women is in practice?

    This is it.

    The minister of finance asks people on Instagram if terrorists should be flown into Finland from Al-Hol camp in Syria.

    I’m mortified this is my country now.

  50. theMann says:
    @eah

    If you are voting for “the lesser of two evils”, you admit that you are knowingly voting for evil. That is the path of damnation, for men and nations.

  51. @Vaterland

    I agree with the most you’ve written, except for two points:

    1. I have a very good opinion on Thatcher, and her ideological revolution was, basically, good. It is true that she, in some aspects, acted & thought in terms similar to the (post)-modern Neocons etc., but she was a product of her age, when Communism loomed large & threatening; she was not a puppet of some globalist conspiracy; she did not want to import blacks & browns in Britain in masses, but was not powerful enough to articulate sensitive racial/ethnic ideas & controversies (personally, I think she did not fully understand the national question). And- she was a genuine British nationalist with wider comprehension of the world, while Johnson is a sleazy & corrupt opportunist; Thatcher was a principled leader who thought that liberalization of economy is best for Britain, but would not go into forcing others to fully or mostly accept it. She knew history & she knew boundaries of interventionism.

    2. as regards Jews -I mean principally their ideological influence – I think you overrate them. There was nothing ideological in paradigm shifts in Anglosphere -most suicidal moves in these societies were caused/provoked/influenced? by popular culture of Beatles, Countercultural 60’s and later, and not by German-Jewish “intellectuals” like Marcuse & the rest. If there is a ruling New Left world-view in affluent Western societies, it cannot be ascribed to any group or a set of individuals of any ethnicity. The New Left ideology (idolization of homosexuals & other “sexual minorities”, hatred towards national identity, extreme feminism & war against nuclear family, fetishization of blacks & Muslims, jabbering about weed & other drugs, female sexual promiscuity, cartoonish war against the imperial past of some European peoples, war against normalcy, idolatry of non-European cultures & primitive forms of society, …)- I don’t see that as a final crystallization of some ideological warfare, but as an almost inevitable end of the trajectory of Western culture in its decadent phase, as in famous hypothetical question ascribed to Lenin: ” Are the forces which propel us to greatness the same that will, transformed by mutations of History, eventually lead to our collapse ?

    • Agree: AaronB
  52. Anonymous[163] • Disclaimer says:

    When Priti Patel (UK Home Secretary) was interviewed after the exit poll was revealed on TV, she didn’t seem very enthusiastic or exited about the prospect of “getting Brexit done”. The host asked multiple times whether the Tories will get on with it immediately now they have a majority and she just kept avoiding the question and refused to put a time frame on it, which is very strange considering Boris Johnson was saying we would be leaving at the end of January.

    It’s as if now they have their majority they are trying to go back on their Brexit pledge.

  53. Such profound nonsense is impossible to top.

    So Stalin was the lesser evil, and Mao was the Lesser evil and Castro was the lesser evil and Honecker was the lesser evil and Tito was the lesser evil and HC/BO/BC were the lesser evil.

    You leftist fools simply turn my stomach.

    AJM

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  54. Agent76 says:

    Dec 12, 2019 Jeremy Corbyn, Boris Johnson and Jo Swinson react to the election results – BBC News

    The prime minister said it would give him a mandate to “get Brexit done” and take the UK out of the EU next month.

    Oct 14, 2019 Queen Elizabeth II on Leaving European Union

    Queen Elizabeth II delivered remarks during the State Opening of British Parliament.

    The Queen always has the final word!

  55. Jan Rain says:
    @animalogic

    No, you are wrong. Corbyn is not a sodding Hollywood actor, and doesn’t need to display “charisma” to win over the public. But, of course, the UK public have become brain-dead morons like their vacuous sheeple counterparts in USA, who elect their Pressies based on superficial appearance and empty rhetoric delivered with an actor’s panache. Corbyn’s courageous publicly-stated policies, such as protection of the NHS and reversal of the privatisation abuses it has become filled with (which I believe was not just posturing by him for votes, but the core of his belief), and his stance on international illegalities such as the treatment of Assange and the issue of Palestine, will be the ethical and moral legacy he leaves in recorded history.

  56. eah says:

    Whatever happens in/to the UK, one thing’s for sure: they’ll deserve it.

  57. Jan Rain says:
    @Dumbo

    Get over it. The “hindus, pakis, caribbean blacks, etc” you disdain and presumably wish annihilated in some form, either by extermination or expulsion, for many decades have been and ARE the sons, daughters, wives, husbands, girlfriends, boyfriends, lovers, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, cousins, best friends, employers, etc of a significant number of “indigenous” Brits. Their identity and presence is a permanent feature of the new UK. By the way, you missed mentioning the somalis, arabs, and other assorted non-European undesirables who’ve interbred with the indigenous populace.

  58. No.

    Corbyn is a self-loathing White leftist that promotes the idea that Africa’s problems are the fault of Whitey. You see they were one step away from Wakanda before Whitey showed up.

    He was obsessed with tearing down the RSA and yet like all leftists doesn’t have an explanation as to why the only advanced African country just happens to have White people.

    Well he can go run for office in Liberia. If race doesn’t exist then he should have no problem turning the place into a utopia.

    Some people here call Boris a barking dog. Well I’d rather see an actual dog over these old school Marxists that cannot move one inch from the theory that Whitey is to blame for third world countries. It distracts them from serving their own workers and leads them to promote third world immigration.

    Africa’s population is going to explode and these self loathing leftists can only blame Whitey and demand we take in more refugees because their sham narrative doesn’t allow anything else.

  59. Realist says:
    @eah

    Yes, miscegenation is really being pushed in majority White countries…but Whites allow it.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  60. how can you ‘not vote for Obama and be happy that McCain lost?’

    Eric Stryker lost me there: how can I go on in credibility with what he has written?

    Striker cant help but be right about Boris however, a clear fake and anti ordinary political factor.

    Corbyn? try as I have I cant get it up for that guy politically. the strong impression I have of Corby is wishy washy…indecisiveness..wont stand up stronly on anything. I noticed his electoral chances improved as soon as he gave an impresstion of strong resistence to the Zionists

    what I like is Corbyn’s anti-imperialism etc… but would he cave on that too if he wins? can he be trusted to stick with and stand strongly on any dam issue at all?

    come to think of it I dont really care about elected politicians as such. ultimately they will not reprsent the popular interest at all..opposed to their own vested minority party interest.

    it is better then to count on either Johnson and Corbyn to continue to rip up Britain as either goes as PM, in the interest of those whom they really represent, in the hope and expectation that at some point the ordianry people will find it quite enough, put an end to the elective political process and create a social organization by them and for them period

  61. Jan Rain says:
    @eah

    We were NEVER asked” bleat the wronged “white” UK masses. Nor were the “browns” and “blacks” and “yellows” whose countries the “whites” invaded, looted, and used the ill-gotten gains with which to enrich themselves and develop their own “white” nations.

    • LOL: eah
  62. @animalogic

    I saw one Johnson ad focusing on Brexit. It had a white wife and a black husband.

    What could possibly go wrong?

  63. Alfred says:

    This election was actually a second referendum on Brexit.

    Labour’s failure to realise this was a 2nd Brexit referendum hands Britain to Boris

    Labour has been waging a culture war against its own base for decades, fixating on liberalism instead (by George Galloway)

    The Labour party has not represented its White work-class supporters for over 50 years. They deserve to be put down like a rabid dog. These 3rd world immigrants have been a disaster to the British working-class. Enoch Powell was entirely correct in 1968.

    Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech

    The sad thing is that by leaving the European Union, fewer Poles and Czechs will stay in the UK but the door will remain open for Bangladeshis, Africans and their ilk.

  64. On crime, it’s obvious that Corbyn’s policies will encourage it, but the ongoing black knife-crime crisis has nobody to blame but the Tories.

    So if a Black youth stabs another over a pair of shoes it is the fault of a conservative political party?

    If I stab my neighbor can I also blame a political party? Do explain.

    Something else you didn’t mention about Corbyn is that he wants to massively expand public education. Leftists know their excuses are running thin because of the internet which is why they want to massively invest into indoctrination efforts. It has nothing to do with actually trying to improve lives through education. They want to graduate another million “social science” activists to turn the tide. Bernie and Warren want to do the same thing.

  65. scrub says:

    This was simply another orchestrated Jewish coup instituted through their control of the media. As hard as it was to believe, the behavior of its controlled media towards Corbyn was even worse and even more vicious than what Trump has experienced.

    Now people will begin to realize why Trump has pandered so much to Jews and Israel. He was simply protecting his flanks. If this outright pandering hadn’t occurred, Trump would have been also been accused of antisemitism and being against Israel, charges which his Israel loving Christian fundamentalist base would have quickly abandoned him over. Trump knows this. John Hagee makes sure he knows this.

    What this election proves is that it will now be increasingly impossible in the future for a politician to be elected in the UK if they aren’t also certified members of either The Conservative Friends of Israel or The Labour Friends of Israel. The Jewish nullification of the Labour Party is now complete. Native born British workers no longer have any sort of effective representation.

    With the Neocon buffoon Boris Johnson now in power the pandering towards Jews will begin in earnest. New laws protecting the interests of Jews in the UK will start to slowly start to resemble more and more those that were put into effect when the Bolsheviks seized power in Russia a hundred years ago. If a person wants to make a speech in public he or she will have to get written approval beforehand from their local rabbi. ( I am am only partially joking about this. Substitute the words city or town council for rabbi to see why,)

    Gilad Atzmon, get ready to pack you bags!

    Trump was undoubtedly watching this election very carefully and his protection of Jewish interests (and feelings) will also become even more ferocious leading up to the next election. (He will now probably offer to allow the ADL to share his office in the White House. Ever the publicity seeking showman, he will probably also offer to be circumcised on nationwide TV)

  66. Rurik says:
    @Anonymous

    issues like immigration and LGBT which are the most important things to the left.

    I think people are in for a shock with Boris, I think he will turn out to be more liberal on some issues than Corbyn would have been.

    “It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.”

    Rest in Peace, Britain

    • Agree: Alfred
  67. Dumbo says:
    @Just passing through

    Canada also has a point-based system and…

    https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/douglas-todd-almost-7-in-10-metro-residents-will-be-non-white-in-two-decades

    Almost seven of 10 Metro Vancouver residents will be visible minorities, or non-whites, in less than two decades, says Eric Kaufmann, a professor at University of London, Birkbeck, citing Statistics Canada projections.

    In addition, Kaufmann said another Statistics Canada report develops projections that he believes suggest Canada as a whole, based on current immigration patterns, will be almost 80 per cent non-white in less than a century.

  68. @Bardon Kaldian

    You will have to ask yourself why in all those destructive movements Jews are significantly overrepresented. Maybe there is no Jewish “conspiracy” here, maybe their destructive group-behavior is not conspirational, but rather instinctive. The result however remains the same.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  69. Dumbo says:
    @Realist

    So “conservative”… Really “conservatives” are worse than useless. And notice that in the commercials it’s always black men with white women… But women are quite dumb and since it’s so as “cool” some go for it… Even if later they end up with a black eye and being single moms. But cuck white men are even worse probably.

  70. Dumbo says:
    @Jan Rain

    Thankfully I don’t live in the UK and honestly, if they don’t care, why should I? Enjoy your multiculti paradise with tri-racial brown people in the wonderful “new UK”. I won’t need to visit — I’ve been to Brazil, I already know how it is. (Only, Brazil doesn’t have such miserable weather)

    • Replies: @Trinity
  71. Rurik says:
    @Jan Rain

    We were NEVER asked” bleat the wronged “white” UK masses. Nor were the “browns” and “blacks” and “yellows” whose countries the “whites” invaded, looted, and used the ill-gotten gains with which to enrich themselves and develop their own “white” nations.

    And now it’s comeuppance time whitey!

    We’re going to rape your daughters wholesale, right in front of your pasty white faces, and the ((government of England)) will arrest your racist arse if you complain!

    You’re going to get a new slate of local commissars to keep tabs on your racist antics.

    Use social media to criticize any of them, and the ‘Bobbies’ will be knocking down your door.

    Only these are not your parent’s Bobbies, are they?

    Think twice, before you criticize immigration on social media..

    Don’t you just well-up with pride, knowing how you kicked those ‘Jerry’s arses and “won” the war?

    Look on the bright side, as your nation descends into madness, and your daughters are pimped out to orcs, at least you’ll be providing an example perhaps for Scotland and Ireland, as perhaps something not to emulate.

    But then, I doubt that will do any good. As long as the (((ECB))) has all the shekels they can print, the whole of the UK is going to go down the Orwellian road to hell on earth.

    You can’t say you weren’t warned. Someone above already linked to Enoch Powell’s prescient speech.

  72. @Jan Rain

    Reason the more to expel them, together with their race-betraying spouses. And no, expulsion is not the same as “annihilation”, only in your false propagandistic mind.

  73. Trinity says:
    @eah

    Those Pawn Vanity type of CONservatives support the same “gubmit” that Fredo Cuomo supports. smdh. Trump and his British doppelganger cousin are nothing more than cartoon characters that are more committed to Zionist and Israel than they are Whites and Great Britain and America. Trump CAN’T OR WON’T even mention what he has done or plans to do for Whites in America. Trump can stand before a 99% audience of 10,000 plus white folk and proudly proclaim what he has done for African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Jewish Americans, blah, blah, blah, BUT NOT ONCE, I’LL REPEAT THIS AGAIN, NOT ONCE, has our duly elected President dared to mention what he has done for his largest base of constituents. If this Trump wannabe and Trump are the “the Great White Hopes” for the West, boy are we in trouble. Of course the alternative to Trump is even worse, so is there really a real choice for “Hope And Change” in America, really?

    • Agree: Daniel Rich
  74. anonymous[191] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jan Rain

    With the right government in Britain, these people could be removed in a few weeks and sent to failed countries where their genes are better suited. As for them being ingrained in society, boo-hoo, the “indigenous” Brits who love them so much can go with them to Pakistan, Jamaica and other countries who will be paid to take them.

  75. Vaterland says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    1. Maybe, if you have lived through her political days yourself and came to this conclusion. I think Andrew Joyce’ take on Thatcher and British nativism in relation to the Trump effect on emerging right-wing populism read sound. https://www.unz.com/article/trumps-thatcher-effect-obstacle-to-white-nationalism/

    I do know that Thatcher’s Britain was strongly opposed to German reunification and we owe it primarily to the Russians and Helmut Kohl’s negotiation abilities; the USA seemed to have been rather neutral and could be persuaded one way or the other. Thus, I consider this interventionist on the part of the Thatcher government.

    2. Oh, on the contrary. I think they are still underestimated. All of the new left’s ideas were present in their writings decades before 1968. And their current ‘anti-white’ demagoguery already widely used in the 60s and 70s where they were still away from full power; see Sartres foreword to Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth. For example, the “diagnosis” of an allegedly pathological nature of both European culture itself and antisemitism can be found in Adorno’s Authoritarian Personality. Marcuse is considered the Godfather of political correctness in its methods and intent for good reason, see One-Dimensional Man. Then Derrida worked dedicated on deconstructing the indigenous nature of language and space – exclusively against white European languages and spaces, I’d argue. Magnus Hirschfeld was the pioneer of sex change operations and sexual depravity since Weimar; Judith Butler the central intellectual of gender theory; Gloria Steinem and Andrea Dworkin of man-hating feminism. The family was consciously targeted by these intellectuals as a means of class warfare and communist revolution, the nation state and ethnic nature of a people as well. And it is Eli Wiesel who I would consider the intellectual Godfather of the anti-German antifa.

    What misses in the Alt-Right discourse is the influence of Christian radicalism and anarchism of Tolstoi on left-wing radicals like Rudi Dutschke and the messianic character of their utopian visions. But pan-Western it was rather a sideshow. Jürgen Habermas is also missing, but I consider him derivative and completely unoriginal. And indeed: some German communists who are today part of the media-political establishment considered Adorno still too harmless. Likewise, The Frankfurt School was not an entirely monolithic block and I’d consider Erich Fromm generally much less harmful, but he was influenced by German Idealism.

    You also seem to miss the influence of the state and systematic reeducation through means of mass culture since the French Revolution and more successfully since the 1920s in the USA when Franz Boas worked on behalf of the US government. System theory, cybernetics, the methods of clinical psychiatry and modern mass psychology were used to design mass culture for the purpose of mass propaganda. Edward Bernays, Freud’s relative, is well known for his influence in this regard on commercials. But the same holds true for something as seemingly harmless as game shows. And there were many more active who are long forgotten today. Lutz Dammbeck has meticulously researched this influence for his documentary Overgames. From his other documentary, starting around minute 56 is particularly relevant

    The overlap between US policies since the great depression, Jewish and actual Freemason funding, state mandated reeducation, mass culture and especially modern mass media is striking; the influence of Jewish psychologists, intellectuals and media producers overwhelming. And it was Margaret Mead, the student of Franz Boas, who was essential for the Macy Conferences which set the course for much of what became so called counter culture already in the 1950s. Granted, framing it exclusively on “JQ” would trivialize just how much of it were official state directives in the interests and explicit desire of the US government and these American-Jewish and Anglo intellectuals mostly delivered and designed what government officials had ordered. Yet significant influence on these state policies came from organized political Jewry in the USA as well. And it was part of the war and propaganda effort against the 3rd Reich.

    Thus, I consider the entire pseudo counter culture of the 1960s an outgrowth of social engineering. The cooperation of Jewish, often communist intellectuals with the government of a nominally liberal and hyper-capitalist state as the USA and even the CIA, with American Jewish elites functioning as a linking bridge, is revealing. Anyone can research all of this, if one wants to. Nothing of it was hidden, even official state department directives. Most people have just never heard of it. And I would like to see the matter as an addition to the American Pravda series; especially since the overlap between the reeducation of Germany and social engineering of the USA is huge.

    The principle danger is to believe that man, as a tabula rasa, was infinitely malleable and it can and should be up to the state to create the “new man” ready for “democracy” based on guide-lines such as “tolerance”. A concept shared by the US establishment, British and Jewish intellectuals, liberals and communists alike. The harmful scope of this systematic psychological restructuring we can witness today. Media creates reality; reality creating media can be used to create a “new man”. And most people have no idea… Truly along Adorno’s lines this holds true: in most cases of personalities, it’s a hubris when they say “I”…

  76. Trinity says:
    @Dumbo

    I take it that you don’t live in America either. The UK is a craphole but as an American, I can’t say that America is that much better off. The one thing we have on the totally CUCKED UK is our freedom of speech, BUT even that is under attack. You must live in Iceland.

    • Replies: @Realist
  77. @Franklin Ryckaert

    In the case of New Left, they’re not even over-represented. And even if they were, they are not the cause (or any one of significant causes)- and that’s what it boils down to. It is not Jewish leftism that has caused anything significant in the modern Western world re debated topics; simply, there is no cause-effect relation.

    West Germans were not re-educated, as many would like to believe. Their home-grown movements, including Rudi Dutschke, Baader Mainhoff etc. had nothing to do with Israel or Jews; most influential German intellectuals (historians, philosophers, writers, sociologists, literary theorists …) in past, say, 50 years were not Judeophilic in any respect, nor was anything particularly Jewish or pro-Israeli reflected in their writings. Nobody of any stature advocated hatred for German identity, or enormous importance of LBGTQXYZ issues or idolatry of Islamosphere & colored races.

    The same goes for other aspects of modern popular culture.

    • Replies: @John Gruskos
  78. @Authenticjazzman

    So Stalin was the lesser evil, and Mao was the Lesser evil and Castro was the lesser evil and Honecker was the lesser evil and Tito was the lesser evil and HC/BO/BC were the lesser evil.

    You leftist fools simply turn my stomach.

    Nothing to get indigestion over.

    It’s just the Unz Jewish Conspiracy and Baking Club. If an anti-White leftist suggests spending 1 dollar less on Israel than the competition then by default he is the lesser evil. Doesn’t seem to matter if he is openly Marxist and blames Whites for failed leftist plans.

    You see according to this well thought out club the left exists because of the Jewish leadership and yet the non-Jewish leadership of the Euro left is victim to Jewish meandering. Fascinating logic really.

    I say smash the Marxists and then deal with the “free market is everything” conservative dopes later. I don’t see why Jews even need to be brought into the conversation, especially when they are on both sides.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  79. @Tony Vodvarka

    No shit. The charge of Anti semitism and other forms of vilification and demonisation were spewed 24 hours a day non stop by the known lobby and their sick treasonous minions who made sure that Corbyn will never get to 10 downing street.

    The Brits better get ready to say goodbye to NHS and welcome bleached Chicken from across the Atlantic.

  80. @Vaterland

    This is too long a comment & it is- mostly wrong.

    With regard to Thatcher, I’ve already said that Joyce was generally- wrong. She oscillated re German unification, but eventually changed her mind.

    Although this article is much better than ordinary Joyce’s unenviable “musings” on JQ, it still falls short in some respects.

    I’ve read Thatcher’s main work “Statecraft” (strange, Joyce never refers to her central ideological book) & what is, for attentive reader evident is: Thatcher was a modern British nationalist with political-economic ideology close to classical liberalism (in her case, Hayek et al.), white not, I would say, quite understanding blood & soil nationalism (which in Anglosphere goes under race realism or more extreme forms as white nationalism).

    As for Jews & Israel, Thatcher was a realist, not a dupe for some imaginary Zionists. Her take was: the state of Israel is here because of Balfour declaration & what happened after. It has nothing to do with “who was there first” or similar abstractions.

    She was acutely aware of national question of European peoples, more than most American presidents. She, I think it is obvious, did not fully comprehend power of racial identity in multi-racial societies. So, bluntly, was she, re racial national question:

    a) completely unaware
    b) partially unaware
    c) aware, but cynical opportunist
    d) aware, but a bit wishy-washy & not willing to open another front, this time potentially much more dangerous than bickering with France & Germany
    e) blinded by her liberal economic philosophy & thus couldn’t see the magnitude of racial component in a national question
    f) traitor

    My opinion is d), plus something of e).

    As for Jews, this goulash of names proves nothing. Adorno was popular, but “The Authoritarian Personality” has virtually vanished from curricula decades ago, and it was not present in sociology classes or public discourse outside of the US anytime in history; it is basically a marginal book no one outside of Anglosphere has even heard of; then, Adorno himself was an European elitist who despised jazz & virtually everything that came from the US, and colored races were not even in his field of vision. Marcuse was the 60’s influence, but in past half a century or so- nobody reads him, nor cares for anything he wrote, nor even knows who he was. The rest (Hirschfeld et al.) are even more obscure & insignificant.

    What has been shaping this self-destructive behavior are not any deep plans, but a confluence of a few elements, the most important being the greed for easy profit by plutocrats like Koch, Buffet et al. There is nothing “deep” about it. Other areas of Western dissolution, say female promiscuity & homosexual behavior, are very present in places where Jewish influence is virtually non-existent, like most of Scandinavia. Even in the US & the rest of Anglosphere, real influences are Janis Joplin, David Bowie, Mick Jagger, Leo DiCaprio,.. and not a bunch of obscure scribblers like Derrida who may have had an influence in the academia (but not in most of Europe)- yet, they ultimately lost because any ideology, whether left or right, was simply run over by empty hedonism & consumerism, all presented in the package of new zombificatory technologies conductive to idiocracy.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
    , @Vaterland
  81. @Vaterland

    The principle danger is to believe that man, as a tabula rasa, was infinitely malleable and it can and should be up to the state to create the “new man” ready for “democracy” based on guide-lines such as “tolerance”.

    I have been saying this for years. Our problems really come from blank slate theory which was heavily embraced by the West in the 60s despite all existing evidence showing it was wishful thinking.

    Blank slate theory not only fuels leftism but also race denying right ideologies like Libertarianism and US conservatism.

    Take away blank slate and it all falls apart.

    Where I would differ from you is in blaming Jews. Practically all Anglo conservative leaders at the highest levels have embraced blank slate knowing full well it is a lie. They think it is better for stability and worry about Whites questioning capitalism if they learn that the “free market” cannot turn the third world into the first. Leftists like Corbyn also know it is a lie but prefer lies to truth and want to dilute White countries to gain a voting bloc before Whites figure it out and turn on the establishment.

    • Replies: @Vaterland
  82. Boris could end up being the last PM of UK/GB. The nationalists won in Scotland and Northern Ireland and could be pushing for independence (unification with EU). Especially if Brexit goes through.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  83. Realist says:
    @Trinity

    It’s the same thing here in the US.

  84. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    Worst of all, Johnson has turned today’s election into a referendum on “anti-Semitism” as much as one on Brexit.

    LOL. Complete rubbish. The election was about leaving the EU, and leaving the EU, as loser PM David Cameron admitted, is about immigration.

    If Johnson fails to put a tight clamp on immigration, say down 80% plus, he’ll be finished by the time of another election.

    And why wouldn’t he close the door to mass immigration?

    It wasn’t Londonistan that elected him. It was the old industrial cities of the north and their working class residents whose slums are being taken over by the native-replacement immigrant crowd who gave Comissar Corbyn the bum’s rush.

    As for the BNP, Johnson is quite right to scorn them. It was a treason party operation run by Nick Griffin, a mason and an associate of Gladio terrorists, who screwed his own party during the 2010 election.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  85. Rurik says:
    @Commentator Mike

    The nationalists won in Scotland and Northern Ireland and could be pushing for independence (unification with EU).

    nationalist independence = unification with EU?!

    I don’t begrudge them wanting independence from ((Perfidious)), but then why the #&%@ would they then then want to have their self-determination nuts cut off by the ECB fiend?

    I suppose it’s all about the shekels.

    >>sigh<<

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  86. Corbyn got attacked by the JEW/ENGLISH ruling class of England.

    Corbyn didn’t get down on all fours like a three dollar whore in front of JOG — JEWS ORGANIZED GLOBALLY — and grovel and whimper like a bought and paid for politician whore at their globalizer Jew feet.

    Boris Johnson and Donny Trump are three dollar whores for the evil and immoral globalizer Jews in JOG — JEWS ORGANIZED GLOBALLY.

    It is well known that Jews are the most ungrateful creatures in England and the USA. It is also well known that JOG — JEWS ORGANIZED GLOBALLY — is using mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration as demographic weapons to attack and destroy the historic American nation and the historic English nation.

    Honest Jews in England must tell the truth about their efforts to use mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration as demographic weapons to attack and destroy the historic English nation.

    An honest American Jew named Larry Auster had this to say about the JEW QUESTION and the United States of America:

    The Jews also (as few people recognize, because the subject is forbidden) changed America in some profound and not always positive ways.

    In terms of national identity, Jews were instrumental in the reformulation of America as a universalist society based strictly on ideology rather than on peoplehood, a change that set the stage for mass Third-World immigration and the much more profound redefinition of America as a multicultural society.

    In terms of morality, many Jewish intellectuals, writers, and entertainers deliberately undermined the older Anglo-American Victorian ethos, a program of moral/cultural subversion that climaxed in the Sixties counterculture and the dominant nihilist culture of the 1980s and 1990s.

    In terms of politics, Jews were instrumental in replacing the old American order of Constitutional self-restraint with the statist politics of unrestrained compassion.

    Tweet from 2015:

  87. Hamilcar says:

    Eric is correct in the short term but this is still a good result.

    Why?

    1. Because it was really just a referendum on Brexit and shows that the British People are trending towards Nationalism. It also brings us one step closer to the collapse of the E.U which will presage the rise of Nationalist parties on the continent.

    2. It’s a demoralizing defeat for the Globalist Left (Which bitterly fought Brexit for years) and if Scotland eventually leaves (Which is much more likely now) the Labour Party is finished for good.

    3. With no more viable hard left Nationalist parties become the Tories main foil.

    Result – Now you finally have an actual right wing opposition in England as opposed to a farce like the Tories.

    As for the Neo-Con stuff I’m hardly convinced Trump will go to war with Iran in a second term and this notion I so often hear from Labour apologists that all the immigration is a result of the wars is simply nonsense.

    They are awful and making the problem much worse but let’s get real here.

    There are billions in the global south making less than $5 a day. They’ve been coming since the 1960’s and if possible they would all move to Western Countries tomorrow.

    And in Britains case they are mostly from her former colonies.

    • Replies: @Popeye
  88. Anon[424] • Disclaimer says:

    Maybe the lesser evil is that Britain is leaving the EU

  89. Onebornfree says: • Website

    So the slaves have gone and got themselves a new , temporary, fake master who’s going to free them all, and make their slavery somehow more bearable,right? Yeah, “right” 😂

    And all the morons on “the right” rejoice, and all the morons on “the left” gnash their teeth.

    And so it goes…….

    “Because they are all ultimately funded via both direct and indirect theft [taxes], and counterfeiting [central bank monopolies], all governments are essentially, at their very cores, 100% corrupt criminal scams which cannot be “reformed”or “improved”,simply because of their innate criminal nature.” onebornfree

    Onebornfree

    • Agree: Johnny Walker Read
  90. The entire column is far too long. All you had to write was “Corbyn has chosen to embrace the Muslims and shun the Jews. And anyone who hates Jews is okay in my book.”

  91. @Vaterland

    Most voters in the Uk are stupid and believe whatever the circlejerkers on the Daily Mail comments sections say, I was reading a few comments today and one of the most liked comments was along the lines of “great win for Boris, now we can leave the EU and end mass immigration”. Leaving the EU and reducing non-White immigration (which is obviously the type people were annoyed about) is pretty unrelated. Even if the UK was in the EU, it has full control of non-EU immigration and if it wanted, could make UK immigration 90%+ White if it wanted to.

    Unfortunatly during the time of the referendum, the refugee influx was in full swing, these refugees couldn’t actually come to the UK as Britiain is not in the Schengen free-travel zone, but the retarded UK voters were led to believe that by Farage’s Breaking Point poster which was a picture from Hngary or somewhere in the Balkans.

    Ultimatley when we leave the EU, the proportion of non-EU immigrants will remain the same and maybe even increase, we will still be signed up to all these weird refugee laws meaning if by chance a whole bunch of MENA migrants who are lounging about in France and Germany at the moment decide they want a change in scenery and want to move to the UK, the UK will not actually be able to send them back.

    Over the past decade, all of the incompetence and lack of political will displayed by UK politicians has been blamed on the EU, people will realise the truth in a few years, by which time they will be burnt out and just give up.

    • Replies: @Vaterland
  92. @CanSpeccy

    LOL. Complete rubbish. The election was about leaving the EU, and leaving the EU, as loser PM David Cameron admitted, is about immigration.

    Yep, leaving the EU was a proxy for less (non-White) immigration, however the two are not actually logically related, hence non-EU (non-White) immigration will remain the same after leaving the EU.

    If Johnson fails to put a tight clamp on immigration, say down 80% plus, he’ll be finished by the time of another election.

    Most people don’t keep track of migration statistics, unless the Daily Mail decide to make a big deal of it, no one will notice and the plebs will keep supporting the blond buffoon as he throws red meat out every now and then.

    It wasn’t Londonistan that elected him. It was the old industrial cities of the north and their working class residents whose slums are being taken over by the native-replacement immigrant crowd who gave Comissar Corbyn the bum’s rush.

    How naive are you? You think that just because he was voted in by White working class, that he is actually under any obligation to do well by them? Blair was also voted in by this same demographic THREE TIMES IN A ROW.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    , @CanSpeccy
  93. @Z-man

    The JBS was yet another victim f the Jewish infiltrate and subvert strategy.

  94. @Jan Rain

    Golly, if whites are so awful, why do they insist on moving to our countries to live?

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  95. Trinity says:

    Comment #89 by “OneBornFree” is so SPOT ON !!! Admittedly even I have to admit that I was fooled into thinking that Trump might somehow be different and looked past his Zionist son-in-law and other warning signs that Trump was just another Zionist shill running for POTUS. I voted for him and it didn’t take long to figure out that he wasn’t that much different than the others before him. New boss same as the old boss just wrapped up in a different package. Whites have learned to become good second class citizens in their “own” countries. PATHETIC.

    • Replies: @Onebornfree
  96. anon[143] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    you are correct, eric

  97. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Just passing through

    hence non-EU (non-White) immigration will remain the same after leaving the EU.

    No. First, because much non-white immigration occurred via the EU. Second, because if the Johnson government fails to curb non-white immigration of whatever source it will be punished severely in a future election.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  98. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Just passing through

    How naive are you? You think that just because he was voted in by White working class, that he is actually under any obligation to do well by them? Blair was also voted in by this same demographic THREE TIMES IN A ROW.

    Blair is now the most hated politician in England. I doubt that Johnson aims to take his place.

    • Replies: @Miro23
    , @A123
  99. Hegar says:

    The moronic “Eric Striker” (not his real name, he’s a guy living on welfare) claiming that immigration is “capitalism” is hilarious. He never has any facts to back up his claims.

    “Striker” dreams of the Soviet Union, which he claims only failed because it was run by Slavs – if it had been run by Germans it would have worked. (Let’s forget about East Germany, right?) He also advocates Whites in the U.S. going on welfare, because “Blacks are on welfare and it makes THEM happy”. Yes, he actually tweets this. Completely contrary to the White interest of staying above the mud. This is because “Striker” himself is doxed so he can’t get a job, and he is on welfare. He wants an excuse for this.

    Fact: Labour started a pro-immigration strategy in the 1980s specifically to get more votes as Whites turned increasingly right-wing, even the workers once they had become more literate.

    The more immigration, the more socialist policies. The more immigration, the higher taxes for businesses and people with higher income than those who never studied in school. Immigration is a leftist issue.

    “Striker” ignores this because he is lying. This guy also claims that anti-immigration parties in Europe, like Vox in Spain, are “false opposition,” because he hates the fact they aren’t run by Marxists like him. Anti-immigration parties are started and run by right-wing middle-class men, who make up the majority of active members, and the majority of their voters come from the right-wing parties, so he has to call them “traitors” so the kids who follow him on Twitter won’t look up what the parties say, or realize the truth about immigration. That immigration is a left-wing thing and the opposition is right-wing.

    “Striker” pretends that “capitalists” make Labour pro-immigration! There is of course zero proof for this. He is lying and hopes you don’t know the truth. “Capitalists,” people who made something of themselves by studying in school and working hard, do not support or control Labour. Communists control Labour, the faction that swamped the party election in 2015 to elect Corbyn as party leader.

    Even without the communist faction, Labour is not “capitalist” like Striker claims. Businesses of course support Tory, since it’s the party that doesn’t want to rob them. Anyone with the slightest knowledge of Labour’s leaders and who donates to which party would know this.

    The only reason some on the Right in politics support immigration is the same as in the rest of the West: The leftist media, leftist Hollywood and leftist teachers brainwash people since childhood. And unscrupolous career politicians obey the media line. But all pro-immigration ideas come from the Left and always did.

    Striker doesn’t say this because he has made a Twitter career, such as it is, out of lying. His audience are kids who grow up with the prevailing leftist mindset, so they want no work and free money – they just don’t want to share it with immigrants.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  100. @Digital Samizdat

    For the same reason that whites moved to places like Africa and set up shop, I doubt the whites did so to get friendly with the local blacks…

  101. for Labour they have won themslves a chance to change leaders. they should get about that immediately and choose a real honest to goodness nationalist, with strong leadership character who can define british interest, work out what would serves it and go ahead with such plan, regrdless of minority opposition

    thats it..win or lose on whats proper. the Zionists made Corbyn dance on the head of a pin which seemed so demeaning to the British. I mean Blair served the Zionist interest too but by demeanor he was as shilly shally as Corbyn. attitude, personality counts

    I mean I am not British and I am left on the ideological spectrum and Corbyn used to make me cringe with his lily livered jumping under the Jewish lash. get him out of there Labor..as fast as you can. the people of Englan apparenly will not give Labour another chance with such as Corbyn as leader

    • Replies: @Miro23
  102. @Rurik

    nationalist independence = unification with EU?!

    Yeah, I know it’s silly, but that’s the state of things, if you’ve been following. Even the Brexit the people voted for isn’t the Brexit they’ll get, even if they get it, as it wasn’t just about leaving the EU but possibly about ending, or reversing, immigration, and that they won’t get as it can hardly be mentioned.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  103. @eah

    The British people voted for Tony Blair 3 times in a row, the BNP only got 1.9% of the vote in 2010 meaning 98.1% were not too bothered about the changing demographics.

    I suppose a lot of people will answer no to immigration when asked in a nice survey format like shown in the video you linked, but they will not actually think much about it and see mass immigration as a national threat when it comes to voting, otherwise the vote share of parties like the BNP and UKIP would be substantially higher, but in reality both parties got very low vote shares in general elections.

    Most Western countries are beyond salvaging at this point, a lot of Whites are actually settling in to the new reality quite well, a small number of the dissenting ones are now launching their e-celeb careers making YouTube videos and asking for donations so they can make ore videos and right-wingers can consume more. It’s all very capitalistic and decadent in my view.

  104. @CanSpeccy

    No. First, because much non-white immigration occurred via the EU.

    An outright lie, most EU immigration was from countries like Poland. Non-White immigration was from places like Pakistan and Nigeria which are outside Europe last time I checked, the EU didn’t make the UK take them in.

    Johnson government fails to curb non-white immigration of whatever source it will be punished severely in a future election.

    Johnson hasn’t really made any hard commitments to reducing numbers, and your thesis that the public will punish Conservatives for not limiting immigration is quite wrong because net-immigration has been on par with Labour 1997-2010 under the Tories for the past 9 years, and yet people still overwhelmingly voted Conservatives despite knowing this party is very weak when in comes to immigration. And secondly, who would they vote for in order to punish the Tories? Labour? Lib Dem? All of those parties are wide open borders as well.

    • Replies: @German_reader
  105. Anon[329] • Disclaimer says:

    Western history makes it clear, as do the Jewish scriptures, that anything that is bad for the Jews, and especially anything that they are unceasingly vocal about, will be good for the majority sociopolitical population of the West whose lands Jews occupy.

  106. Onebornfree says: • Website
    @Trinity

    Trinity says:”Admittedly even I have to admit that I was fooled into thinking that Trump might somehow be different….”

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Agree: Trinity
  107. German_reader says:
    @Just passing through

    Johnson hasn’t really made any hard commitments to reducing numbers

    In fact, he’s come out in favour of amnesty for illegal immigrants (which is bound to increase immigration through family reunification etc., also encourage even more illegal immigrants to come):
    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/boris-johnson-vows-to-back-amnesty-for-illegal-migrants-ghjsd5jms

    The Spectator and the Torygraph also support it:
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/11/14/tories-should-offer-amnesty-illegal-immigrants/
    https://www.spectator.co.uk/2019/11/the-case-for-amnesty-why-its-time-to-offer-citizenship-to-illegal-immigrants/

    I don’t know how anyone can imagine that Johnson’s government will take meaningful steps to cut immigration, it’s far more likely it will turn out like with Trump and his “We want far more immigrants to come than ever before”.

  108. Charles says:
    @Kali

    The American colonies didn’t “vote” themselves free of the Crown. The USA didn’t defeat the Confederacy with speeches. The American West wasn’t conquered with referendums. When a person claims to desire genuine – even cataclysmic – change, but states that violence is “never the answer” or “not the solution” or whichever phrase is appropriate, that person is believing in something that has never happened in our human history – the attaining of power without the use of force.

    • Agree: Haxo Angmark
    • Replies: @Kali
  109. Miro23 says:
    @CanSpeccy

    @Just passing through

    How naive are you? You think that just because he was voted in by White working class, that he is actually under any obligation to do well by them? Blair was also voted in by this same demographic THREE TIMES IN A ROW.

    Blair is now the most hated politician in England. I doubt that Johnson aims to take his place.

    Among the elite Zio-Glob Davos crowd Tony Blair is popular and they’ve made him a multi-millionaire. So within his group he’s OK.

    IMO, Johnson is part of exactly the same crowd (check his background, track record and the UK media) and he’ll follow exactly the same policies. The shadow state clearly don’t want Brexit so Johnson will fudge it for a few years, finally deliver something like Theresa May’s BRINO (Brexit In Name Only) and get his due rewards and status from the group that matters to him.

  110. Paul C. says:
    @Nodwink

    Boris has in part Jewish ancestry as did Cameron, as does Macron, as did Sarkozy and Hollande, as does Merkel. And if you research more European heads of State you’ll find similar. Same with the US. Trump and Obama have Jewish ancestry and there’s a question of whether Trump secretly converted to Judaism a year ago, like his daughter did. Trump has never been Christian as he’s an admitted Freemason and you can’t serve two Gods (Christ and Lucifer). His father succeeded in NYC real estate on a smaller scale due to the brotherhood of Freemasonry, which is judaic through and through. Donald exploited this to a larger degree (he also studied the Kabbalah) and built his empire on it and when he faltered, was saved by Rothschild in order for them to use him today as President.

    But the ancestry of the heads of state matters little anyhow as they’re all figureheads and controlled. JFK was the last to have autonomy. Since him, the cabal has circled the wagons on their control of the West and the world. But few realize this, so nothing will change and everyone will continue to be confused as to why the world is as it is.

    And of course their control is not limited to gov’t, but far beyond. Control of the central banks gave them control of all institutions of society: media, gov’t, science, education, law, etc…

    The world has been and continues to be deceived in this spiritual war. Christianity and the white race are under stealth attack.

    • Replies: @Popeye
  111. @Z-man

    And now he’s the British PM, lol!!! The joke may be on the Brits.

    BoJo was London’s mayor.

    Studying that moment in time [2008 – 2016] showcases what will happen in and to the UK over the next 4 years [and it ain’t gonna be fun].

  112. A123 says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Blair is now the most hated politician in England. I doubt that Johnson aims to take his place.

    Well said.

    This was a one issue election. Part of “Get Brexit Done” is reducing the flow of non-assimilating migrants. And, Boris has no choice other than delivering on that promise.

    The brainwash victims of the Globalist elites refuse to accept that:
    “Project Fear” was a lie.
    — The lie lost.

    There is some bizarre brain damage that causes them to believe:
    — Germany can dump enemy troops (illegal immigrants) on the UK.
    — The UK will be helpless to respond to German aggression.

    The British Navy is certainly not the force it once was…. However, German naval power is functionally non-existent. If the UK has the will return illegal migrants to Germany there is absolutely nothing that Germany can do to stop them.

    Do you want to guess who NATO will back if Trump chooses to intevene? — HINT: It will not be the dead weight nation that refuses to live up to the 2% standard.

    The UK holds all the cards.

    The EU is a circular firing squad with 27 Generals and no sergeants. Worse yet, they have crippled themselves with negative interest rates in a futile attempt to prop up insolvent banks and a failing currency union.

    The ancient Greeks warn about “Hubris”. One fears that the EU Globalist Elites are so out of touch with reality that they are going to deliver “Mega-Hubris v2.0”.

    PEACE 😇

  113. Miro23 says:
    @ben sampson

    For Labour they have won themselves a chance to change leaders. they should get about that immediately and choose a real honest to goodness nationalist, with strong leadership character who can define British interest, work out what would serves it and go ahead with such plan, regardless of minority opposition.

    Since Corbyn is out, they need a new leader. The probability is that it’ll be a Zio-Glob Blairite.

    The “honest to goodness nationalist” will have to come from somewhere else, but, if he’s there, and he’s genuine, he would draw on the British interest from the Right and the Left.

  114. Smith says:
    @Thulean Friend

    Nobody cares.

    Get Brexit done then we can talk about anything else, it’s a political deadlock.

  115. Popeye says:
    @Paul C.

    Would appreciate any links you can provide on partial Jewish ancestry of Macron, Merkle, Sarkozy, etc.. thank you kindly..

  116. @Bardon Kaldian

    In the case of New Left, they’re not even over-represented.

    What a shameless liar you are!

  117. Popeye says:

    Well Boris wins big as did Nicola Sturgeon’s Scottish National Party. She’s claiming she has popular mandate to push for a new Scotland independence referendum in 2020. I half suspect that she n Boris might strike a nice compromise where both can shine in glory. Somewhat like Nixon secretly flies to see Mao. Why do I say this? Her chance of winning a second independence referendum is at best 50-50. Last time just a few years ago independence lost by almost ten points. She has no guarantee she can sweet talk scotland into the EU as Spain clearly states it will veto, due to setting a precedent for Catalonia. She needs to have a wide open door to EU before going down Referendum Road. And if she loses IndyRef2 she has one option only which is to quit. Scottish independence would be dead for generations, as is Quebec independence which also lost two referenda. Voters say no to a third bite at apple. So watch for the Grand Scottish Revival of the UK. You saw it here first.

    • Replies: @Lurker
    , @eah
  118. Popeye says:
    @Hamilcar

    Maybe UK should not have colonized the Indian subcontinent, Nigeria, Jamaica, Trinidad, Ghana, Kenya etc. A bit late now…

    • Replies: @Hamilcar
  119. Lurker says:
    @Just passing through

    Continental Europeans are also far less cucked than Brits

    Continental Europeans are also able to vote in systems of proportional representation, a reasonable number of votes start to translate into actual seats. In Germany 5% is enough to start getting representation. If UKIP or the BNP could have hit or exceeded 5% nationally that would mean -absolutely nothing. They would still likely end up without a single MP. So there is a massive demoralising effect. If you look like losers, you are losers.

    And thats leaving aside the full spectrum assault via the MSM plus legal harassment from the state and non-state entities.

  120. Lurker says:
    @Popeye

    I don’t think the SNP has ever exceeded 50% of the vote, in fact its current vote is down from its peak a few years ago. Its not as if they aren’t winners, an SNP vote isn’t a wasted vote in terms of gaining representation.

  121. @Really No Shit

    Boris…

    What else do the Brits need to sink their virtual ship…?

    • LOL: Ian Smith
    • Replies: @A123
    , @Trinity
    , @Really No Shit
  122. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Bardon Kaldian

    This is too long a comment & it is- mostly wrong.

    It was a very interesting comment that is–mostly correct.

    You seem to have a very hard time noticing destructive social patterns in modern Western civilization over the last 100 years and the almost invariant Jewish over representation in these destructive patterns.

    Monolithic media control by one ethnic group surely has some powerful effects on a society?

    You will get no argument from me that the clueless and often venal Gentiles have played important roles in the destruction of their culture and their civilization.

    But the Jews have been and continue to be the Pied Pipers of the destruction of the West and your predictable defense of their negative influence appears contrived and insincere.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  123. @Puffdaddy

    irrelevant.

    ZOG uniparty. Same as ‘Murka:

    Rothschild won. Whites

    will not evade the genocide

    by voting at it.

    • Agree: Trinity
  124. Ian Smith says:

    I would have voted Conservative. A vote for Corbyn would mean a return to the quasi-Soviet conditions of Britain in the 70s, but with the demographics of today.
    The only thing Corbyn had going for him, from a dissident right perspective, was that he criticized Israel. This actually makes me happy to have Tlaib and Omar in Congress; the fact that the cause problems for The Lobby.
    With Johnson, there is at least a reasonable hope that things will get worse at a slower rate. With Corbyn, the UK is guaranteed to get worse faster. If meaningfully reduces immigration, cracks down on grooming gangs and the like, then he’ll be worth it even if he isn’t the reincarnation of Enoch Powell.
    While Striker brings up some good points, he still has hard left views on economics, hence Corbyn as lesser evil.

    • Replies: @9/11 Inside job
  125. A123 says:
    @Daniel Rich

    What else do the Brits need to sink their virtual ship…?

    One has to understand that any Main Street politician must manipulate the elite Globalist, Fake Stream Media complex.

    Trump does this by running their weak little minds in circles via twitter. See the sample below where the humorless media engaged in deranged mouth frothing over what was obviously a joke.

    Boris does this by “Being a Dork”. No one could possibly look like that much of a Doofus by accident. It has to be deliberate. The anti-democratic Fake Stream Media wants to attack Boris in a savage and brutal manner. Except they can’t. Savaging “The Dork” will inevitably generate sympathy for “The Dork”.

    PEACE 😇
    _______

  126. Trinity says:
    @Hegar

    I have worked hard all my life and used to look down at the RELATIVELY few Whites who lived off the dole, but now that I think about it, I would much rather pay for a FELLOW White to live off the “gubmint” than all the nonwhites who have been ABUSING THE SYSTEM FOR GENERATIONS.

    Matter of fact it might be a good idea for a lot of Whites to do the same damn thing as nonwhites instead of being slaves for a system that doesn’t give two sh*ts about Whites. Can you imagine IF every working class white person were to quit their job tommorrow? How long do you think this country would last? Blacks want to talk about “slavery.” Working class Whites have been little more than slaves themselves for a century or more working long hours just to send off a big chunk of their pay to feed, clothe and house nonwhites who have been on the dole for generations. “Reparations?” IF anyone deserves reparations in this country it is working class Whites. IF this “Striker” guy is on the dole, I personally could care less and I am glad to see a white person, especially a white male receive a “gubmint” check like all those millions of nonwhites.

  127. @Ross45

    Corbyn’s mistake was not taking aim at the Blairites from day 1 and purging the party of them. The Blairites are owned by the tribe. A simple ‘we are returning to our roots” speech would have put the Blairites and the tribe on notice that their abandonment of traditional Labour supporters was over. Every time they opened their mouths, the response could have been, you have treated our supporters with contempt. Corbyn made the same mistake every politician does when dealing with the tribe. Being a target for them might not gain Labour new supporters, but it would have consolidated the base.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  128. @sally

    Gordon Duff, a.k.a. Bob Foote is full of excrement. A number of years back i outed him on a subject on which I had personal knowledge. My response was edited to eliminate the “outing”. When I responded to his attack, my response was again edited, even though I was making it clear that I was done with the site.

  129. @Z-man

    Nigel Farage is a great talker. However, UKIP was formed to destroy the BNP, something Farage openly claimed was his goal. At the end of the day, Farage only differs from the Tories and Blair in that he wanted the UK out of the EU. He, like the Tories and the Blairites, were still in the tribe’s pocket.

    • Replies: @Jack744
  130. @animalogic

    Whew! For a while there I thought you were talking about Winston Churchill.

  131. anonymous[677] • Disclaimer says:
    @Curmudgeon

    He was certainly knifed in the back by Blairites in his own party on a regular basis. They regularly proclaimed he was unelectable and then did their damnedest to make sure he was unelectable.

  132. Hamilcar says:
    @Popeye

    And yet for all the sins of British Imperialism this was still a matter of choice a generation after it disintegrated.

    They could have just listened to Enoch Powell and simply said no.

    While even a country victimized by invasion and Colonialism like Ireland or one with no responsibility for it whatsoever like Sweden passively accept the same fate and busily “build their own funeral pyre”.

    • Replies: @Herald
  133. Vaterland says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    As for Jews, this goulash of names proves nothing.

    Where to even begin? Maybe you should have actually read the comment. Or watched the documentaries included for that matter. Especially the parts where Lutz Dammbeck, himself a leftist actually, goes to US government archives and shows us the material on mass propaganda. I could also actually go down the road and meticulously prove to you when, where and who worked on what, including for the US government. But then you would complain, it was “too long” and still deny the evidence. It was also the Jewish mafia of Meyer Lansky which had attacked the German-American Bund until it was officially disbanded for Un-American activities.

    “The Authoritarian Personality” has virtually vanished from curricula decades ago, and it was not present in sociology classes or public discourse outside of the US anytime in history; it is basically a marginal book no one outside of Anglosphere has even heard of

    Yeah, I only know it since two decades, even though I have never studied sociology; same for the Dialectics of the Enlightenment which was also a best-seller, and Adorno and Marcuse were the Godfathers of the 68ers. Adorno was rock-star famous and only Jürgen Habermas may be considered to have had a greater influence on the left-wing propagandists who now work in the thousands in our government, especially in the state media. And neither Hirschfeld, whose works were burned by the Nazis and his institute closed down for a reason; nor Gloria Steinem, the feminist intellectual up to this day, or Judith Butler the founding mother of gender theory; let alone Edward Bernays, or Margaret Mead who wrote the best-seller on anthropology in her time Coming of Age in Samoa or her mentor Franz Boas who had transformed the field and is largely responsible for the decoupling of anthropology from Darwinism, are in any way “obscure”, or “nobody has heard of them”. While I do appreciate any insult of Derrida, neither was he unfortunately.

    Their influence on academia, intellectuals, journalists, media producers who finally also produce “Janis Joplin, Mick Jagger and Leonardo DiCaprio” overshadows any superficial stars who are nothing but products of the cultural industry, often used for social engineering purposes. Indeed, the music industry and Hollywood are means of social engineering, they have been from the start; and so has been radio. All mass media is. And the government was interested and involved from the start.

    A very disappointing reply and in no way a rebuttal.

  134. Vaterland says:
    @John Johnson

    Well, I did “blame” specific Jews, but did indeed include explicitly that it were gentile liberals and communists as well and the US government on whose demand and in whose interests these Jewish intellectuals had worked (albeit lobbied by official Jewish institutions as well). Specifically around the time of the Great Depression, when race relations were terrible and endangering the USA to fall apart, and it was in the interest of the US government to transform the attitude and consciousness of the masses in this regard. Which was also when its officials had approached Franz Boas. The other very significant time is the systematic reeducation of my country and its crossing into the cultural revolution in the 60s.

    If I’d blame anything it’s liberal individualism and anti-metaphysical materialism linked to Capitalism and Marxism alike. Liberalism combined with Protestantism is also a problem. And while the base of these current elite and mass tabula rasa attitudes alike come from cultural tradition, much of it from the Anglosphere, the point is, that these attitudes didn’t just appear out of nothing and happen to be so. They are the direct result, particularly on the part of the masses, of systemic social engineering from public education, academia and especially mass media. From the 1920s onward to this day. And it’s a huge illusion to believe, that methods and means like these were exclusively to be found in National Socialism or Communism. Morgoth also made a video on it, focussing on public reaction management to terror attacks, in current year Britain:

  135. Vaterland says:
    @Just passing through

    I completely agree.

    And I think non-European immigration will increase unfortunately. It’s obviously in the interest of British elites. And Johnson himself has come out many times in favor of amnesty, commonwealth immigration, he even lobbied for Turkey to join the EU. A proposition that was only ever brought up, because the USA wanted a u-boat inside the EU (source: Willy Wimmer, closest advisor to Helmut Kohl); the race mixing add for Johnson’s “conservatives” is just the cherry on top.

    It’s all very sad. Not a single Guardian or BBC propagandists will go out of job post Brexit, not a single grooming gang less will roam the streets, Britain also won’t become whiter, if it’s what the Brits wanted. And Europe as a whole is weakened in favor of the US/Ziocon Empire.

  136. Anonymous[165] • Disclaimer says:

    I don’t really get the Trump comparison with Boris. Boris is in his position precisely because he is a “Heinz-57” highly privileged aristocrat, he is the definition of a career politician.

    Trump is first and foremost a self-made businessman, his appeal is precisely because he is not a typical career politician. Boris in contrast has never achieved anything outside of politics, he has never had a non-political job.

  137. @lavoisier

    You seem to have a very hard time noticing destructive social patterns in modern Western civilization over the last 100 years and the almost invariant Jewish over representation in these destructive patterns.

    Monolithic media control by one ethnic group surely has some powerful effects on a society?

    No, I have an easy time in deconstructing myths. Correlation is not causation & twisted, partial view on society & history in past 100 or 200 years is simply what it is considered to be by the best minds anywhere – there is not an individualized group of people plotting anything to harm Western civilization as such.

  138. @Ian Smith

    Like Trump , Johnson will be great for millionaires and billionaires who just happen to control the press that made Corbyn “the most smeared politician in history “. Also Johnson, the avowed Zionist, will do great things for Israel particularly as his cabinet will be comprised mostly of Zionists . Last, but not least ,Corbyn represented a threat to the Monarchy ,with Johnson in power that threat has passed for now . Few people know that an MP has to swear allegiance to the King or Queen , otherwise they are unable to take their seat in Parliament . The UK is a plutocracy with close ties to the monarchy .

    • Replies: @Ian Smith
  139. Herald says:
    @Puffdaddy

    Given the election triumph for the blond bozo, it is now absolutely certain that Corbyn will be much the lesser evil. Interesting times ahead for the UK.

  140. @Vaterland

    The more he downplays the subversive role of the Jews, which is easily demonstrable, the more he raises the suspicion that he is one of them, or at least works for them.

    He does not make the impression of being stupid, naive or ignorant, so why is he doing this?

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  141. Anonymous[278] • Disclaimer says:

    Socialism is completely finished in Britain. People have no desire to pay additional tax for the benefit of society as a whole, perhaps a consequence of mass immigration and multi-racialism? In fact, socialism is currently so unpopular in Britain that I find it quite hard to fathom that Labour ever won elections in Britain under a socialist platform at all or could do again in the future, Britain seems like a de facto one party state now.

    I suspect a significant percentage of the British population would like to see the NHS dismantled and replaced with a privatised insurance system if it meant they were paying less tax to the government. The NHS is the last remnant of a Britain that no longer exists.

    • Replies: @9/11 Inside job
  142. eah says:

    link

    Even more interesting data on the UK election at the link above:

  143. eah says:
    @Popeye

    Just like EU membership will mean the end of an Irish Ireland, independence and EU membership will mean the end of a Scottish Scotland, since Scotland, like Ireland, is a country with a very small population — don’t take my word for it, listen to a soyboy Jew who, along with many like him, will avidly help and cheer as the EU brand of neoliberal ‘refugees welcome’ globohomo dismantles Scotland.

    • Replies: @Popeye
    , @eah
  144. @Anonymous

    Any form of Socialism will be destroyed where the plutocrats control the flow of propaganda and own the mainstream media .Creeping privatization is slowly destroying the NHS and is likely to accelerate under Boris Johnson . The British public has no idea what’s in store for it under a US system of healthcare with outrageous charges , with
    millions uninsured and underinsured , unaffordable deductibles and people forced into bankruptcy due to medical bills they cannot pay . Like the hidden tax the British had to pay for the Korean war they may have to pay a similar tax for the coming war against Iran being pushed by Netanyahu . Boris Johnson is the answer to the prayers of the British billionaires and millionaires who do not wish to share or give up their ill-gotten gains earned off the backs of the working poor and the middle-class debt slaves .

  145. Trinity says:
    @Daniel Rich

    My God, that picture says it all. What a clown. Even more of Zionist controlled cartoon buffoon than Trump if that is possible.

  146. It is said that Theresa May was eased out of office by British Zionists and replaced by Boris Johnson as she was too wet (?) soft on attacking Iran . Boris Johnson the avowed Zionist has apparently no such qualms and now Mike Pompeo has threatened “decisive action ” : “US threatens Iran over attacks (false flags?) on military bases in Iraq” alethonews.com

    • Replies: @KA
  147. anonymous[307] • Disclaimer says:
    @Vaterland

    [The cooperation of Jewish, often communist intellectuals with the government of a nominally liberal and hyper-capitalist state as the USA and even the CIA, with American Jewish elites functioning as a linking bridge, is revealing. Anyone can research all of this, if one wants to. Nothing of it was hidden, even official state department directives.]

    Thank you very much for this excellent comment. Everyone should read your comments

    You are absolutely right about the cooperation of the Jewish ‘intellectuals’ with intelligence services while pose as ‘left’ pro working man. All lies.
    Even Trotsky was a joke, and if he was alive, he would have been a rabid zionist.

    The role of the Jewish ‘intellectuals’ cooperating with CIA to foll the public was not ‘Nothing of it was hidden’. It was hidden, although the zionist media knew, so other people ‘leftists’, but was not known to the public.
    Later in 2000, the first edition of “Who Paid the Piper: The CIA and the Cultural Cold War by Frances Stonor Saunders, was published where revealed the role of the Jewish ‘intellectuals’ cooperating with CIA and MI6 against Soviet Union. Don’t listen to those who deny the destructive role of the Jewish Tribe and their influence on the economy, wars and culture worldwide to divert attention somewhere else and blame others. People should just DISCARD them.

    To know about “Cultural Cold War’, please read the following

    https://www.lahaine.org/petras/b2-img/CIAcultCW.pdf

  148. anon[281] • Disclaimer says:

    Immigration from East European countries to UK is solely due to the indigenous production and , self creation of chaos and self destruction of choice by leaders of these countries and not because UK needs or needed them

    3 rd world countries ‘simmigration is result of invasion – invitation .

    In Britain one hears more anti Polish hatred than one what’s anti Paki hatred .

    Polish are hated in NY and Chicago and Detroit .

  149. KA says:
    @9/11 Inside job

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/us-government-pentagon-fake-al-qaeda-propganda-videos-a7348371.html

    500 million to make false video depicting terrorism and inciting public :

    That’s just what exposed and how many billions not exposed or not known !!

    I still believe a lot about 911 from Gov
    But I am losing my trust and no longer believe Bin Leden had any personal knowledge or role into this .

  150. Jack744 says:
    @Just passing through

    From what I recall, the BNP were doing far better than UKIP a decade ago, and were really the dominant nationalist force in British politics. I honestly don’t think most UKIP/BNP voters care since they just see UKIP as a softer version of the BNP anyway.

    According to Nick Griffin, the real reason the BNPs support collapsed was due to the BBC and specifically its “Question Time” programme promoting UKIP and Nigel Farage to effectively control the nationalist right-wing opposition by making it civic nationalist, pro liberal capitalism, and pro non-EU immigration.

    Considering the amount of times Nigel Farage appeared on Question Time after Nick Griffin’s public lynching on there in 2009, without having any more support or electoral success than the BNP at least in the beginning, it does seem there is truth to this.

  151. Jack744 says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Do you have any evidence Farage was controlled by them? As far as I know, none of his doners were one of them.

  152. Herald says:
    @Hamilcar

    or one with no responsibility for it whatsoever like Sweden

    That is not anything like a fitting description of the warring and land grabbing Sweden, as I recall from my European history lessons.

    • Replies: @Hamilcar
  153. ENGLAND FOR THE ENGLISH!

  154. @KA

    “The big lie : Obama did not kill Osama Bin Laden ” Stephen Lendman , globalresearch.ca
    “FBI says no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 ” globalresearch.ca

  155. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I think you probably answered the question.

    Willfully ignorant is another possibility.

  156. Hamilcar says:
    @Herald

    For a short time Sweden was a significant power and had a small Empire but of course it was European and they were never a significant Colonial power.

    I think the only one they had was briefly in New Jersey until the British took it.

    There were probably Swedes involved in the Slave Trade in some capacity but my assumption is not even remotely to the same extent as countries like England, Holland or Spain.

    Perhaps you could argue Scandinavian immigration to the upper Midwest but that would be a stretch too.

    And again, despite its sins this was still a matter of choice and purely a consequence of policy.

    You don’t “have” to let them in over “guilt” or lefty whining.

    You can simply say no; I don’t care about your grievances and then send them packing which is exactly what the British should have done.

    • Replies: @Herald
  157. Ian Smith says:
    @9/11 Inside job

    Ok, let’s say Corbyn got in, abolished the monarchy, and broke diplomatic relations with Israel. This affects the inundation of the UK from blacks and browns how, exactly?

    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @9/11 Inside job
  158. Trinity says:

    Thinking about one of the comments talking about Eric Striker being on the dole had me thinking again about Whites in Europe, Australia, and North America GOING ON STRIKE. IT IS OBVIOUS to all but the MOST DUPED AND NAIVE fools out there, that we WON’T VOTE OUR WAY OUT OF THIS MESS. Of course Whites NEVER stick together on anything. Whites are now back to packing pro football stadiums after a year or so halfhearted attempt at boycotting the NFL. Whites chose to continue to watch mostly rich black football players, who don’t give two sh*ts about Whites or America btw, play a kid’s game instead of sticking to their principles. NO WAY would Whites give up a paycheck or two to ensure and demand their survival in their own lands and protect their civil rights. As long as Whites continue to sit on the sidelines and bitch and moan on the internet and nothing more we can expect the same old story. And IF you think Trump and his buffoonish doppelganger are the answer or your savior, MAY GOD HELP YOU.

  159. Angharad says:
    @Jan Rain

    If Whites are so horrid, why are Blacks and Browns desperate and demanding to live in (once) White countries, anti-White racist?

  160. @Ian Smith

    Who are blacks and browns ? Are you using the definition used by apartheid
    South Africa ?

    • Replies: @Smith
    , @Ian Smith
    , @Dave Bowman
  161. Trinity says:

    IF Jan Rain empathizes with all the nonwhites of the world so much than what in the hell is she doing using a computer, driving a car, or catching a flight to a vacation spot? Hell, I bet you a dollar that Jan Rain ( if she is White or a Jew) has NEVER HAD TO ENDURE BEING IN A SETTING WHERE NONWHITES WERE THE MAJORITY AND SHE WAS IN THE MINORITY. Of course Jan might be nonwhite and WE ALL KNOW THAT NONWHITES ARE FAR MORE RACIST AND PREJUDICE THAN EVEN THE MOST RABID KKK KLANSMAN.

    Hey, Jan Rain, I have worked in situations where I and a few other Whites were the minority and I went to school where Blacks numbered nearly 40% of the school population and let me tell you something, the most racist White doesn’t hold a candle to the blatant in your face Black racism that I seen with my own two eyes. Hispanics, Orientals, Middle Easterners/Jews, East Indians,etc., ALL are FAR MORE RACIST THAN WHITES.

  162. lavoisier says: • Website
    @KA

    I still believe a lot about 911 from Gov
    But I am losing my trust and no longer believe Bin Leden had any personal knowledge or role into this

    .

    You either take the red pill or the blue pill. There is no purple pill.

  163. @Kali

    Of course it was fixed. Anybody with a brain knows that all such elections are fixed. The only hope in the US is that one group of fixers will outfix other groups.

    This is a dumb website. Nobody on here believes in false flags, conspiracy theories, or vote-fixing. They just swallow what they’re told by the MSM. Why don’t they just go back to CBS News and nod in solemn agreement.

    • Replies: @Alden
  164. @Jack744

    From what I recall, the BNP were doing far better than UKIP a decade ago, and were really the dominant nationalist force in British politics. I honestly don’t think most UKIP/BNP voters care since they just see UKIP as a softer version of the BNP anyway.

    I cannot prove this for certain but a lot of BNP voters were not actually that in tune with the racialist ideology of it, Nick Griffin had to moderate and modernise the party when he took over the reigns from John Tyndall under whom the BNP was an explcitely National Socialist party. The new BNP was on the surface, a pary made in the image of Enoch Powell but it still had then NS undercurrent to it. For example I recall the logo of the youth wing of the BNP being the odal rune which was previously used by an SS division and since WW2 has been exclusively used by neo-Nazi movements, Nick Griffin’s comments regarding the Holocaust an Hitler were well known, although he tried to deny it, in the process not convincing his detractors AND enraging BNP old guard for “cucking out” (as it were). A lot of other people who weren’t BNP supporters but didn’t like immigration were put off by the Nazi stuff in the party (which the media obviously exploited to the fullest extent). They even had a “Whites Only” membership policy which I though was a bit unneccessary.

    According to Nick Griffin, the real reason the BNPs support collapsed was due to the BBC and specifically its “Question Time” programme promoting UKIP and Nigel Farage to effectively control the nationalist right-wing opposition by making it civic nationalist, pro liberal capitalism, and pro non-EU immigration.

    That episode was the most watched QT episode in its history, 8m+ people watched it compared to the average of 2.5m. It was obviously heavily biased against BNP but polls conducted after the episode showed that it didn’t harm them and in fact gave them a tiny bit of a bump in support.

    From the wiki entry “Question Time British National Party Controversy”

    The first opinion poll taken after Nick Griffin’s appearance, conducted hours after the programme by YouGov for The Daily Telegraph, indicated that voter support for the BNP had increased by 1%, from 2% to 3%, in the previous month, and that 22% of voters were now “seriously considering” voting BNP in a future local, general or European election — broken down into “definitely”, 4%; “probably”, 3%; and “possible”, 15%.[60] The bookmaker, William Hill, changed its odds on the BNP winning a Westminster seat in the 2010 General Election from 10-1 to 7-2 after the programme.[49] The BNP received 1.9% of the vote in the election and did not win a seat.[61]

    Perhaps people regarded the BNP as the nuclear option and were still trusting of more civic nationalists parties, I wasn’t as aware of the demographic issue back then as I am now but I do recall having an uneasy feeling about them. In my opinion they should not have publicly advocated for repatriating immigrants. I know this was voluntary repatriation but there was the sense that they would resort to intimidation. They should have stuck by their message of free-speech and a complete halt to all immigration and naturalisation, as well as actually trying to remove illegals, the repatriation could have come later on.

  165. Smith says:
    @9/11 Inside job

    The “asian” and african, are you friggin kidding? The UK is white, get out of it, ya fucking parasite.

    Apartheid SA was also a power unlike the current shambles.

  166. @MarkU

    ” . . . the killing of a female remainer MP by a right-wing nutter . . . ”

    ‘Some’ think that ‘it’ was not a right-wing nutter?

    “The UK parliament continues to live in a fantasy world, pretending that the Jo Cox assassination was a real event. Evidence shows that the man that was officially convicted for her alleged murder was not on Market Street where the attack occurred. Since his arrest, Tommy Mair has not been allowed to make any statement about what happened to him that day.”
    https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=276&part=1&gen=2
    https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=266&part=1&gen=2

  167. @Dumbo

    ” . . . the killing of a female remainer MP by a right-wing nutter . . . ”

    ‘Some’ think that ‘it’ was ‘a false flag’?

    “The UK parliament continues to live in a fantasy world, pretending that the Jo Cox assassination was a real event. Evidence shows that the man that was officially convicted for her alleged murder was not on Market Street where the attack occurred. Since his arrest, Tommy Mair has not been allowed to make any statement about what happened to him that day.”
    https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=276&part=1&gen=2
    https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=266&part=1&gen=2

  168. businessinsider.com : “The scandals that could bring down Boris Johnson as Prime Minister ” :
    “Boris Johnson’s position as Prime Minister is under threat following a series of allegations that he groped women and misused public funds ”
    Could these allegations of misconduct and public corruption bring down Boris Johnson during his second go around as PM ?

    • Replies: @Smith
  169. What will Britons do when they get their Brexit, but the borders remain open? And they still face ridiculous “hate speech” laws?” Let’s see how popular Boris is when the UK public realise that they’ve been had.

  170. Ian Smith says:
    @9/11 Inside job

    Oh, for crying out loud, are you channeling Sargon “I don’t know what a black man is” of Akkad? Or do you think race is a hologram like the 9/11 planes?

    • Replies: @9/11 Inside job
  171. Anonymous[251] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack744

    BNP support surged when Muslims began letting off bombs in Britain, and it declined when they stopped, and they stopped because Britain got out of Iraq. The BBC had nothing to do with it.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  172. Herald says:
    @Hamilcar

    You make several fair points and I fully accept that Sweden’s colonial record, though not non-existent, is small beer compared to the big league serial offenders.

    I am also prepared to give the Midwest Swedes a free pardon this time around.

  173. Kali says:
    @Charles

    Oh yee of little vission?

    The fact is that the ONLY way to effect REAL (not “taking power” but moving beyond the entire “power paradigm”) change right now is to do so without violence.

    Should the people take arms against the establishment without the support of the military, they will be crushed and marshal law imposed. We know this. So, as tempting as it often is to rise up in violent rebellion, the exercise would be wholy counter-productive. I dare say, only the politically illiterate and easily manipulated (see the Protocols of Zion to understand the ways (((they))) manipulate and use the Mob) would embark on such a venture.

    Should people take arms WITH the suport of the military, then very quickly the establishment will re-asert itself, albeit with different rulers… comprised of (((those))) who would financially support such an undertaking. “Meet the new boss…” (Maybe this is what you’prefer?)

    In the meantime there are already huge changes taking place in peoples lives as consciousness and awareness grow amongst the masses.

    And that raising of consciousness is the key to establishing a wholy new paradigm outside of the economic and political structures which currently bind us.

    Many people are beginning to understand exactly how the system works to enslave them. Consequently many have already exited that system and many more are in the process of doing so, as their circumstances allow, and as the rest of us create spaces (physical and economic) within which they can grow, develope new skills, etc.

    A new non-exploitative economic structure, based on exchange and gift economy models, is beginning to florish in small pockets all across Europe, and I dare say, across most parts of the English speaking world.

    Free Markets (not the neoliberal kind, but ones in which goods and services are either given freely or bartered) are springing up all over the place now.

    Already a small movement to bring unused agricultural land nack into production is growing, with the cooperation of land owners who prefer their land be used. – The land I currently live on and cultivate is a case in point, and there’s plenty more.

    And on and on it goes – squat collectives networked with food distributiin networks networked with producers and growers networked with lawyers and legal-eagles networked with builders and cooks and drivers and solar engineers and …. etc.

    And every day more come. And slowly, exponentially, we starve the beast.

    Of course, if all you’re interested in is putting your own king on the thrown to replace the current one then violence may be your only option.

    But don’t be fooled into thinking that that is what real change looks like! And don’t be fooled into thinking the beast (the Economy Stupid) dies in that scenareo. Your own comnent reveals the truth of the matter… with every “change” of that sort, the beast engorges itself and thrives.

    Think OUTSIDE the box!

    Kali.

  174. @Ian Smith

    I believe that the 9/11 planes were CGI’s not holograms , see Septemberclues.info

    • LOL: Ian Smith
  175. eah says:
    @Jack744

    Whatever else one may say about Nick Griffin, he was one of the very first to raise the alarm about Asian gangs sexually brutalizing young white girls –> link

    But instead of investigating his allegations, which would have perhaps prevented tens if not hundreds of thousands of young English girls from suffering terrible abuse, they prosecuted him for ‘inciting racial hatred’ — which tells you all you need to know about how disgusting modern Britain is:

    … take a look at this short video. It was recorded secretly as part of a BBC smear programme that tried to get Nick Griffin thrown into jail for daring to speak out and expose what was going on.

    It is an extract of a speech Mr Griffin gave in the West Yorkshire town of Keighley, one of a series of talks he gave at meetings of the British National Party, all over Britain, warning about what was going on and trying to mobilise peaceful political organisation to force the ‘elite’ to take action to protect the hundreds of thousands of innocent victims.

    Today, we know that up to a MILLION young girls have been repeatedly gang-raped – many of them in the years that FOLLOWED this warning, which Nick Griffin gave back in 2004.

  176. Anonymous[177] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    The level of Islamic terrorism is generally directly proportional to that countries interference in Muslim countries, just as IRA terrorism is directly proportional to the British government’s interference in Northern Ireland, it surprises me how few people seem to understand that, or want to understand that as the case may be.

    The problem is a lot of gullible members of the public believe that invading and bombing Muslim countries makes their country safer when really it’s just making their country a big target for Islamic terrorists.

  177. @John Johnson

    I don’t see why Jews even need to be brought into the conversation, especially when they are on both sides.

    Congratulations !! You win this month’s Star Prize – for the stupidest comment of the month on the internet.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  178. @Vaterland

    It was also the Jewish mafia of Meyer Lansky which had attacked the German-American Bund until it was officially disbanded for Un-American activities.

    And so what? Considering that Hitler’s regime persecuted Jews, as such, publicly, their co-ethnics clashed or attacked evidently pro-German (Hitler’s German) side whenever they could. What’s wrong or unreasonable about that?

    Dialectics of the Enlightenment which was also a best-seller, and Adorno and Marcuse were the Godfathers of the 68ers. Adorno was rock-star famous and only Jürgen Habermas may be considered to have had a greater influence on the left-wing propagandists who now work in the thousands in our government, especially in the state media.

    Nobody actually read Dialectics of Enlightenment, this is as obscure work, or even more obscure than Heidegger’s “Being and Time”. I don’t know whether it was a bestseller- I heavily doubt it- but even if it was, “bestsellers” of these kind were Lenin’s, Khomeini’s, Mao’s or Sartre’s “Being and Nothingness”- and nobody cared or read them.

    Just as I said: Hegel’s “Phenomenology of Mind/Spirit” or Heidegger’s “Being and Time” are enormously more important, history- wise & with regard to publication, than anything Marcuse or Adorno had written, and no one of sane mind would say they definitely influenced any type of social-change or cultural trend. Even readable & immensely influential in the sphere of ideas, Spengler’s “The Decline of the West” did not have any influence in empirical, real life.

    And neither Hirschfeld, whose works were burned by the Nazis and his institute closed down for a reason; nor Gloria Steinem, the feminist intellectual up to this day, or Judith Butler the founding mother of gender theory; let alone Edward Bernays, or Margaret Mead who wrote the best-seller on anthropology in her time Coming of Age in Samoa or her mentor Franz Boas who had transformed the field and is largely responsible for the decoupling of anthropology from Darwinism, are in any way “obscure”, or “nobody has heard of them”.

    These are completely marginal people, except for Bernays in the field of marketing & Mead in American anthropology. What made homo “revolution” visible, were not some worthless scribblings, but natural dissolution of American ordered society & the concomitant “troubles” (gay riots in New York, pervasiveness of gay sub-culture in various strata of Anglophone society, while there was not such thing in Italy, France, Germany etc.). Hirschfeld is an absolutely marginal writer, an author virtually no Stonewall rioter had heard of, and various influential homosexuals in public sphere, whether high or low, were completely unaware of.

    Margaret Mead was not just a transmission of Franz Boas, but an independent hoaxer whose body of work remained confined to Anglosphere, or more specifically to the US- until its “deconstruction”. Real ethnologists & sociologists (Malinowski, Durkheim, Levi Strauss, ..) whether in Britain, France or elsewhere, never accepted that quasi- Rousseauan fake narrative of tropical paradises. Franz Boas is, with regard to world anthropology- a marginal figure, an American phenomenon -whichever his origins – as influential as, say, William James in philosophy.

    While I do appreciate any insult of Derrida, neither was he unfortunately.

    Derrida was a derivative (Jewish) French author who, along with Lacan & much more influential Foucault, disseminated Frenchified & homosexualized nihilism of Heidegger in the American academia. He was ethnically Jewish, but his dogmatic cultural relativism was a goulash of primarily German thought (chief authors being Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud & Heidegger), especially in its radical, nihilist, morally relativist & misanthropic aspects. The guy, along with much more pernicious Foucault, was a self-destructive sicko & psychopath, not some subversive Jewish schemer.

    Sorry, but what you wrote amounts to nothing. There is no conspiracy (Jewish, Masonic, Frankfurt,..); Jimmi Hendrix & Mick Jagger were not tools of Bernays or Derrida- and they influenced, by their behavior & “works”, enormously more people than aging Adorno or Derrida or any intellectual, for that matter. Simply- the world does not work that way. Your view on society and what makes humans tick is narrow, conspiratorial & generally wrong.

  179. @9/11 Inside job

    HMMmm… OK… If you prefer..

    West Indian niggers, African coons, and millions of assorted middle-east Moslem filth.

    Better ?

  180. @Dave Bowman

    Congratulations !! You win this month’s Star Prize – for the stupidest comment of the month on the internet.

    Ok genius why don’t you explain why I should focus on the Jews when authoritarian leftist Sweden has practically no Jews and yet will arrest you for simply posting on this website.

    Around 20k Jews in Sweden
    https://eurojewcong.org/communities/sweden/

    I’ll be waiting for your response. We’ll see if you can provide an actual retort with substance.

    Normal Unz Jew haters are free to respond as well.

    Signed,

    An independent anti-liberal pork eating Germanic American

  181. Popeye says:
    @eah

    Well many of the Eastern EU nation’s are very firm on not accepting refugees from Middle East.. including Poland, three Baltic states, Czech & Slovak republics.. and Hungary was first to loudly say No.. if the Scots were like minded, so could they…but it seems that current political culture in Scotland is very receptive to accepting refugees..

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Popeye
  182. axisoflogic.com :” Did Mossad assassinate Anna Lindh? The death of Anna Lindh another Swedish critic of Zionist extremism murdered in Stockholm, Sweden .”

  183. eah says:

    link

    Less than a week after winning the general election Boris Johnson begins his attack on free speech!

    It is the right of every UK citizen and group to decide who and where they purchase goods & services from.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  184. opendemocracy.net : Revealed : ” Boris Johnson , the Russian Oligarch and the page 3 model ” By James Cusick :
    “Exclusive : parties at Italian villa ,where nothing is off the menu, raise fresh concerns about PM being a security risk “

  185. Trinity says:
    @eah

    “without our Jewish citizens we would be a lesser nation.”

    GOD HELP US.

  186. eah says:
    @eah

    the end of a Scottish Scotland

    BBC — Perth city centre ‘It’s ok to be white’ stickers condemned

    Scotland’s deputy first minister has condemned the appearance of stickers bearing the slogan “It’s ok to be white” in Perth city centre. …

    John Swinney, who is also MSP for Perthshire North, said the “atrocious” stickers had “no place in Perth or any other part of our country.”

    Police Scotland said it was “currently looking into the matter.”

    Local group Perth Against Racism said it has been contacted by local people who said the appearance of the stickers had made them feel unsafe.

    One person told the group: “I am certainly worried now for my daughters who are not white but are from Perth.

    It’s sickening and disgusting to know that people think like this.”

  187. Rurik says:
    @Commentator Mike

    that’s the state of things, if you’ve been following. Even the Brexit the people voted for isn’t the Brexit they’ll get, even if they get it, as it wasn’t just about leaving the EU but possibly about ending, or reversing, immigration, and that they won’t get as it can hardly be mentioned.

    I have an Irish buddy who told me Boris will get Brexit done by October, 2019. I told him I doubted it. It turned out I was right, but nothing to gloat about.

    It’s sort of funny, the Globohomo insists that much of the antipathy for the EU comes from ‘racist, neo-Nazis’ like Tommy Robinson. Because they question the wisdom of massive and transformational immigration into England. And they actually say that in such a way as to shame the Brexiteers for wanting to curb immigration. Whereas I see any British person who isn’t demanding a moratorium on immigration, as beneath contempt.

    When the ‘Indians’ of this continent were being colonized, that didn’t bode well for their future. But no doubt there were a lot of ‘Indians’ (with shinny trinkets in their tepee) who were shilling that whitey was nothing to worry about.

    Being colonized is never a good thing, whether you’re an Amerindian on the plains, or a British citizen of England. It requires that you either self-castrate, or resist.

    As I watch in horror and amazement today, as England collectively self-castrates.. I only wonder at the depths of ignominy and abasement that a people are willing to plumb.

    So yea, I certainly would have no use for the EU, (((ECB))), that is the driving force for England’s (and the West’s) ignominious self-immolation.

    They should tell the EU to fuck off. And then begin the process of sending all their non-British immigrants to the houses of the member’s of the EU. Starting in Belgium.

  188. Alden says:
    @obwandiyag

    Please don’t insult me by thinking I believe anything in the MSM. What I do; I just assume everything in the MSM is a lie and the opposite is true.

    It’s simple and fast. Best example is Clinton’s Serbia vs Bosnia mess. I was very busy and paid no attention. But because the MSM and Clinton were against Serbia and for Bosnia, I assumed the opposite. That Bosnia were the bad guys and Serbians the good guys.

    Turned out I was right and MSM the usual liars.

    We UNZ guys may believe and argue about some pretty far out conspiracy theories. But we don’t believe it even read and listen to the MSM,

  189. Anonymous[103] • Disclaimer says:
    @Popeye

    Why do so many people think Scotland is a sovereign state? Scotland is part of the UK, it’s immigration system is the British immigration system.

  190. Popeye says:
    @Popeye

    My particular comment was made on the premise of Scotland becoming independent…that it could follow a.path like Poland or Hungary or Czech republic..but it won’t…due to its political culture

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Striker Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings