The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Striker Archive
Inside the War to Take Away Our Free Speech
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Many Americans are rightfully on guard when it comes to their Second Amendment rights. There is a whole subculture, lobby and multitude of groups dedicated to celebrating firearms, monitoring political attacks on gun rights and fighting against them.

On the other hand, another cherished freedom, the right to express your beliefs, has been totally ceded to Jewish dominated left-wing activist groups, like the ACLU.

Those ignorant of our nation’s history, and especially of Zionist mobilizations in the present, live with the comforting lie that free speech is an inviolable right.

Today, the Jewish community in the United States, which has wrongfully earned a reputation for harboring civil libertarian views, has been at war with the very concept of the First Amendment.

Whether it’s former CEO of the National Constitution Center Richard Stengel writing opinion pieces calling for hate speech laws, or Jonathan Greenblatt of the Anti-Defamation League calling on Congress to act against “anti-Semitic” opinions on the internet, it’s clear that the Jewish community no longer respects this freedom and is working tirelessly to abolish it.

The cultural taboo against questioning the sanctity of the First Amendment have quickly been eroded since the election of Donald Trump. Today, panels discussing calling for limits on free speech are no longer exclusively populated by communist academics or blue-haired “SJWs,” but by actual Attorney Generals supposedly tasked with upholding civil liberties, like Josh Shapiro.

The ACLU, which won a free speech absolutist reputation after its army of largely Jewish lawyers defended brownshirt wearing “Nazis” in Skokie, today has abandoned this role and largely refuses to defend comparatively less controversial “hate speech” and political assembly after realizing nationalists are now a serious political force.

Looking at the history of First Amendment cultural and legal battles, the pattern becomes clear: the Jews claiming to be fighting for free speech only did so to create space for unpopular left-liberal movements in the 1960s and 70s. Today, the Jews and the left have been absorbed by the neo-liberal establishment and no longer has any movements challenging the status quo, so they have lost interest in defending the right for citizens to assemble to try and effect social change, which has been disastrous for today’s dissidents since all advocacy groups are in their hands.

Don’t Assume Anything About Your Rights

Whitney v. California, decided in 1927, is seen by some as one of the most important contemporary affirmations of the right to belong to dissident political organizations and contribute to the marketplace of ideas.

Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis ruled with the majority in overturning the prosecution of Anita Whitney, who had founded a communist organization labeled a criminal syndicate in California, much to the chagrin of Herbert Hoover. Brandeis, a Zionist activist, made this decision at a time when the distinctions between Zionism and the heavily Jewish communist movement were not so cut-and-dry.

In his opinion, the Jewish justice Louis Brandeis wrote passionately about the moral importance of the free exchange of ideas in a liberal democracy, winning him the reputation as a Jewish pioneer of civil liberties. He was one of the first judges to promote the idea that open debate allows good to triumph over evil.

But Brandeis’ reputation as a lover of free speech and ideological diversity is brought into question when looking at a later ruling by another Jewish Justice, Felix Frankfurter, who Brandeis closely mentored and for years used as a personal mouthpiece.

In 1952, Frankfurter established one of the first precedents for European-style “hate speech” laws in American history.

The case of Beauharnais v. Illinois was remarkably similar to Whitney v. California. A man in Chicago posted leaflets in his city bringing attention to black crime, and called on whites to join his political advocacy movement. The materials did not express any violent sentiments.

Frankfurter, authoring the opinion in the 5-4 ruling upholding Beauharnais’ conviction under Illinois hate speech statutes, declared that Beauharnais was guilty of “group-libel” against blacks by referring to their role in the increased crime rate, and that libel was not protected by the First Amendment.

“Hate speech” laws in Europe are premised on this same assertion, that generalizations about groups constitute “libel” and can thus be prosecuted.

What is most disturbing about Beauharnais v. Illinois is that the Supreme Court has yet to overturn it.

The closest precedent some legal scholars cite as overruling it was New York Times v. Sullivan in 1964, where it is claimed that SCOTUS found in favor of free speech above libel law.

But here too, we find that the political nature of the dispute may have played a greater role than the principle of free speech itself.

In the case, the Jewish controlled New York Times ran an advertisement from of a pro-Martin Luther King organization making outlandish and slanderous claims against the police in Montgomery, Alabama. A recent article by the Los Angeles Review of Books meticulously documents how Jews were in charge of every nook and cranny of the “civil rights movement” as well.

L.B. Sullivan, the Montgomery Public Safety Commissioner, decided to take them to court to clear his police department’s name. It was broadly accepted that many of the claims in the ad were false and he won his case in the Alabama state court, but upon later Supreme Court challenge it found that libel statutes did not apply to the white policemen because they could not prove “malice” in the printing of said lies.

Today, the free speech law and the political conditions of their application remains opaque. While this author believes conservative anti-environmentalism is absurd, the Supreme Court’s refusal to clarify the National Review‘s right to give a subjective opinion in the Mann v. National Review defamation case last November suggests our higher courts don’t find our First Amendment to be as sacred as we once assumed.

In this case, a college professor is suing the National Review for libel over an opinion piece questioning his data on global warming. The National Review has so far spent millions of dollars defending itself over multiple years, often being dealt crushing defeats in lower courts. They have the support of many major think-tanks and big money over an issue far less “controversial” than race or Jewish power, and yet they still have been unable to find a court willing to unambiguously defend their right to weigh in on a hot-button political issue of the day.

Donald Trump’s executive order essentially banning students from engaging in criticism of Zionism on college campuses is another shocking attack on free speech. While some Jews will admit that it is unconstitutional, there has yet to be any significant legal challenge to it. Compare the lack of interest to the immediate court injunctions Donald Trump gets for even the most minor decrees on immigration enforcement.

Prominent voices in the Jewish community have now begun discussing the viability of using group-libel precedents in Beauharnais v. Illinois to persecute and prosecute “anti-Semites.” It is vital to begin preparing for legal onslaughts on this front on par with gun rights advocacy, especially as popular discontent against the neo-liberal order grows.

Zionist Frustration with Privatized Censorship

In the 1980s and 90s, Jewish organizations like Joseph Levin’s Southern Poverty Law Center pioneered “private” methods for suppressing pro-white or nationalist speech. The tactic was to use the broken civil court system strategically to bankrupt political organizations and leaders that they saw as posing a political threat to Jewish power.

In tandem with FBI surveillance and entrapment, along with media and corporate censorship, this tactic has long functioned to discourage political advocacy and lobbying by nationalist groups.

But what happens when there are too many people to sue and they by and large go out of their way to obey the law? Jewish organizations like the SPLC and ADL have been wildly successful in working with Jewish run corporations like Paypal, Google and Facebook to artificially reduce the number of political views, books and ideas the public can access.

Yet, the old playbook has not stopped the growth of interest in ideas they deem “hate” or “anti-Semitic,” as they are not addressing the egregious economic and social conditions, like globalization and the rise of competing nationalisms inside the United States (“identity politics”), that have predictably sparked the awakening of racial consciousness in white people, the only group banned from having these feelings despite being permanently besieged.

The Sociology of the First Amendment

A 2017 study by the Cato Institute polled people’s views on free speech across racial lines, finding that Jews were the most likely to favor restrictions on “hate speech” of any ethnic group.

Majorities across racial groups, to different degrees, opposed firing people from their jobs for believing blacks are genetically inferior (including 51% of blacks), along with a wide variety of other PC faux-pas. “Doxfiring,” the practice of causing people to lose their jobs for their political or social views is in other words highly unpopular.

Similarly, “punching Nazis” (the survey was taken months after the media campaign about Charlottesville) polled poorly among “Latinos” and blacks, with 80% and 73% stating that it was unacceptable, showing that the pervasiveness of this call to violence is not to protect minorities, but actually largely the product of Jews and wealthy left-wing whites occupying cultural chokepoints and creating a false impression. Individuals who identified as Republicans were more likely to support “punching a Nazi” than typical Democrats.

Even more interesting is the fact that blacks and “Latinos” polled wanted stronger regulations applied to sexual content, which Jewish liberals have historically conflated with free speech. Majorities in the same two groups showed disinterest and irritation at the very concept of political correctness.

In other words, Jews agitating for hate speech legislation in the name of protecting minorities are acting unilaterally and only using these other groups for cover in their war on whites, as was the case with the largely Jewish beginning of the NAACP.

When Jews are separated from whites in surveys, they show a preference for harsh and draconian restrictions on political speech, shattering the illusion of Jewish liberalism.

In a Knight’s Foundation poll, Jewish students were the most likely to support curtailing the First Amendment in the name of “inclusion,” with 65% saying so. White Christians held the polar opposite opinion across all denominations. 68% of students in general complained that the problem wasn’t hate speech, but campus officials policing speech, which 68% said they found to be suffocating.

83% of Gen Z students also answered that using violence to shut down a rally, speech or protest was never acceptable, contrary to what many in the media and elite promote.

While it is true that non-whites broadly have more mixed opinions on gun rights and free speech than white Gentiles, the people composing the brain trusts and money-power leading the war on our civil liberties is the same as the one which oppressed people in the Soviet Union and oppresses Palestinians today.

The universalist Jewish humanist is a work of fiction. America has a free speech emergency.

(Republished from National Justice by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 196 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. onebornfree says: • Website

    “America has a free speech emergency.”

    No, America has a Constitution and Bill of Rights emergency!

    It’s a big mistake to just cherry pick one of the original 10 amendments in the Bill of Rights.

    Doing so gives the false impression that the other 9 are doing fine- they’re not , they’ve all been completely destroyed by the government and the courts.

    Regards, onebornfree

  2. Jewish groups have worked to outlaw ‘hate’ for decades. Of course, the definition of ‘hate’ keeps broadening. In Europe, Jews long ago succeeded in outlawing hate speech and Holocaust Denial.

    IMO the ACLU defended the Nazi marchers in the 50s as a tactic to legitimate their efforts on behalf of Communists.

    The right should make an effort to publicize the crimes of Communism and campaign for laws against denying or defending them. They could prosecute people like Jurek, the Sanders campaign worker. It would be fun to hear the left defending their right to say such things while denying the right’s right to speak its piece.

    Try fighting back, people! Tit for tat, as they say.

    • Replies: @getaclue
    , @renfro
  3. In hindsight it indeed seems kind of dumb to put a bunch of Jews in charge of advocating on behalf our right to speak freely. Especially since these Jews had already had an organization which existed solely to prevent their being “defamed” by others. And I did not know that, at least in some American jurisdictions, “hate speech” statutes have existed on the books going back as far as at least the 1950s. Most interesting.

  4. Cowboy says:

    Kunstler is the prototype of the jew lawyer who defiled the principle for sectarian gain.
    But those gains now need to be conserved and the principle discarded with nihilistic glee

  5. getaclue says:
    @jack daniels

    If I recall rightly some of those “Nazis” later turned out years later to be quite er, “kosher” may we say….”Thru Deception We Will Wage War” don’t cha know….

    • Replies: @DanFromCT
  6. Biff says:

    You do not have any “rights” in this world – you have privileges, and all of them are temporary.

    • Agree: Ghan-buri-Ghan, Moi
    • Replies: @Thomasina
  7. anarchyst says:

    There is a way to use the jews’ own tactics against them…

    Produce flyers with pictures of four prominent “holocaust ™” historians (revisionists) (Monika Schaefer, Sylvia Stolz, Ursula Haverbeck, and Ernst Zundel) who have been imprisoned in Germany and Canada for questioning “certain aspects” of the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” along with the message: “Why Have These People Been Imprisoned? or “Current-day Victims of Thoughtcrimes”.

    Leave them outside the jewish “freak shows” known as jewish “holocaust ™ ” “museums”.

    Mail copies of these flyers to your local television stations along with a letter feigning (false) outrage. You can bet that these media outlets will “run” with the story, showing them as a good example of “anti-semitism” and promising that “law enforcement” will look into the perpetrators of these “anti-semitic” tomes.

    What better way to get free publicity for our cause…

    • Agree: Irish Savant
  8. barr says:

    Cotton with two other senators requesting an investigation into a group that criticized the killing of Suleimani.– https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2020/01/19/tom-cotton-soldier-in-bill-kristols-proxy-war-against-evil/ also calling anti semites anybody he doesn’t agree with
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/01/21/warmonger-cotton-accuses-antiwar-think-tank-of-anti-semitism/
    He is invoking foreign registration act when he is himself ignoring the decades long behavior of Kristol ,his money pit .

    • Agree: Desert Fox
    • Replies: @simpleman
    , @Anonymous
  9. Mulegino1 says:

    The operating strategy of organized Jewry is consequentialist- not principled- i.e., “Is it good for the Jews?”

    So naturally, history’s champion whiners and litigators will be for “free speech” in direct proportion to their powerlessness in a culture or society, and be against it in inverse proportion to their undue influence upon it. This always plays out the in the same way. Naturally, the Jewish anarchists, social revolutionaries and Zionists were all for an absolutist interpretation of the First Amendment or, outside the US, freedom of expression when they were a relatively powerless minority. Yet they imposed the most draconian laws against expression of dissident opinion when they gained the upper hand- to the point of imposing the death penalty upon “antisemitism” as a counter-revolutionary act in the USSR. Now they have enacted speech laws in Europe which would probably have shocked even Orwell, and are attempting to do so in the US, albeit in a more evolutionary and gradual manner.

  10. A123 says:

    Florida is fighting back for Free Speech rights: (1)

    A bill will be introduced next week in Florida, aimed at allowing lawsuits to be filed against social media platforms for political censorship.

    Under the bill, if companies running social media sites whose influence is seen as having grown to that of a public square are found to have violated these rights, they will be ordered to pay at least $75,000 in damages.

    Another point of the bill is to prevent the companies in question from using the notion of “hate speech” in court to justify their actions or defend themselves for removing content and censoring their users.

    PEACE 😇
    _______

    (1) https://reclaimthenet.org/laura-loomer-social-media-censorship-bill/

  11. renfro says:

    Jews have always bought governments and their rulers to serve the Jews.
    That’s been their pattern thru out history and it continues today as we see.
    Of course its even easier for them to do in a democracy where they can pervert and twist democratic rights to serve the Jews.

    As for the First Amendment , the Second Amendment was added in case the First Amendment failed.

    It appears to be failing so what next.

  12. Call it TRUE SPEECH. The Jewish Power simply cannot abide by People speaking truth to power. Free Speech was fine with Jews as long as they could use it to subvert white Christian America in an order in which they and their allies controlled all the media. Internet changed the game, and Jewish Power simply cannot stand competition and the power of truth.

    Jews aren’t so much alarmed about free speech as about TRUE SPEECH. After all, Jews don’t you saying crazy ridiculous things as long as you yammer about fake moon landing, hologram planes on 9/11, and etc. Jews get real nervous when you dare speak the TRUTH about WHO has the real power and how that power is used and abused by Jewish-Zionist Globo-Homo hegemonists.

  13. @anarchyst

    Or how about this: outside your local Holohoax museum, post a flyer saying, “It’s OK to be a Gentile.”

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @A123
    , @anarchyst
  14. Donald Trump’s executive order essentially banning students from engaging in criticism of Zionism on college campuses is another shocking attack on free speech.

    Shocking? Hardly. Trump’s fawning love of Zionism has long been a matter of public record.

    Individuals who identified as Republicans were more likely to support “punching a Nazi” than typical Democrats.

    Probably because most of them are cux who think the Nazis were ‘leftwing’.

  15. A123 says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    post a flyer saying, “It’s OK to be a Gentile.”

    I doubt your target audience would understand. They would read the sign as:

    It’s Ok to be GENTLE.

    PEACE 😇

    • LOL: Lot
  16. anarchyst says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    Probably get arrested for “hate speech” lol

    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
  17. renfro says:
    @jack daniels

    Jewish groups have worked to outlaw ‘hate’ for decades. Of course, the definition of ‘hate’ keeps broadening. In Europe, Jews long ago succeeded in outlawing hate speech and Holocaust Denial.

    Jews can’t comprehend you can’t outlaw hate, you cant legislate hate or anti Semitism or any other ‘feeling’ out of people.

    You can try to shut them up but even that doesnt work, they will form their own society and talk among themselves and bring others with similar feelings in…like the KKK or the Communist Party or Save the Earth or PETA or whoever.

    Jews are not people smart, they spend their time studying their own Jewish navels, not other people. They are blind to how others think and how others see Jews.
    What the Jews are doing in using our government to censor and punish us is throwing dynamite in a barrel and sitting on the lid .
    Eventually it will explode.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  18. Wally says:
    @anarchyst

    said:
    “Produce flyers with pictures of four prominent “holocaust ™” historians (revisionists) (Monika Schaefer, Sylvia Stolz, Ursula Haverbeck, and Ernst Zundel) who have been imprisoned in Germany and Canada for questioning “certain aspects” of the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” along with the message: “Why Have These People Been Imprisoned? or “Current-day Victims of Thoughtcrimes””

    – Good idea.

    – BTW, here’s a much more complete list of persecuted / imprisoned “holocaust” Revisionists:
    Official list of Revisionist scholars persecuted / imprisoned for questioning the “Holocaust”:
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12642

    Only lies require censorship.

    • Replies: @Been_there_done_that
  19. Parfois1 says:

    …the people composing the brain trusts and money-power leading the war on our civil liberties is the same as the one which oppressed people in the Soviet Union and oppresses Palestinians today.

    This never ends… What has the Soviet Union got to do with your free speech? Why do you need Pavlovian-dog-like to insert a slanderous cliche unrelated to the subject matter by implying/stating that a tiny minority of Jews oppressed the Soviet people?

    You might say that about the US now (after all they rule almost everything that matters) but not the USSR, not even in the early stages of Bolshevik rule when many Jews flocked to the anti-Tsar parties. The most vicious of the anti-Bolshevik groups were the Right Socialist Revolutionaries run by Jews. The Bolsheviks were the leading force of the Revolution and the victors of the civil war and foreign invasions (UK, France, Japan, US, Poland, Finland and others, plus 50,000 Chech troops stranded in Russia at the end of WWI) because the people were on their side. You cannot win a civil war without people’s support; after all, a civil war is a people’s war.

    The slander is even more grotesque when recent history revealed that the “oppressed” people of the Soviet Union actually voted to be oppressed !!! (and for the uninitiated here, they even recently voted Stalin the 3rd most celebrated Russian of all time, ahead of all the Great Tsars and Tsarina). At the 1991 referendum for the preservation of the Soviet Union, 80% of the voters voted my a majority of over 76% in favour.

    When writing banalities as this any serious reader dismisses what you say as baseless gibberish. What’s the point?

    • Agree: Adûnâi
    • Replies: @Truth3
    , @Vaterland
  20. Omegabooks [AKA "Anon"] says:

    Well since I can’t agree with comments on here since I am forced to use Anon (can’t use my actual name and I don’t know why but I cannot change it…what’s with you UNZ?) I will say OneBornFree is absolutely correct, It is a Bill of Rights Issue! Just wish I could post an agreement…and ohyeah, I have posted well over 5 comments in the last 30 days as Anon 346. But OneBornFree is wrong about one thing–the Bill of Rights has ARTICLES, not amendments. The Bill of Rights is UNalienable, not inalienable. So I guess that makes me anti-semitic… One o’ these days, being call anti-semitic will be a badge of honor.

    And A123, a Zioshill for sure, Laura Zioshill Loomer can kill me you know what…she’s as free speech as the ADL!

  21. Parfois1 says:
    @Mulegino1

    … to the point of imposing the death penalty upon “antisemitism” as a counter-revolutionary act in the USSR…

    Bullshit! Read the relevant article of the Soviet Criminal Code, nowhere is antisemitism or Jewish ever mentioned.

    I could direct you to it, but as a punishment for your stupidity, you do the legwork to prove what you stated. While you are at it, try to find out whether anyone has ever been sentenced for anti-semitism, although I could save you the trouble: no-one.

  22. Crazy Horse says: • Website
    @renfro

    Gotta laugh they give the K squad credit for being “stable geniuses” yet they seem really stoooopid. Case in point. Nobody ever heard about Pierce’s Turner Diaries until the SPLC made a big brouhaha about it and put it on the underground best sellers list.

    As far as the second most minorities and people of color I know support it. Why? In South Central LA there used to be a joke that calling for pizza delivery got a faster response than calling 911.

    Funny thing is that most of the anti-gun nuts as I call ’em look like they just stepped off the Mayflower. I mean they live in guarded gated communities with “armed response” yet they expect those who are less fortunate to unilaterally disarm themselves. Yeah that worked out well at Wounded Knee.

    Back to the First. They think because they cry “antisemitism” that people are going to shut up. Worked out well for the Weimar Republic didn’t it?

  23. The Cato Institute survey was interesting to say the least. I was quite surprised to see that Blacks and Latinos overwhelmingly think speakers who say ‘all White people are racist’ should not be allowed to speak on campus or community centres, while White people do not oppose such a thing. I suppose this lines up with White people being more tolerant of free speech but I was under the impression that minorites only wanted one-way hate speech laws.

    Also from this article by Striker

    In other words, Jews agitating for hate speech legislation in the name of protecting minorities are acting unilaterally and only using these other groups for cover in their war on whites, as was the case with the largely Jewish beginning of the NAACP.

    Non-Jewish minorites are not really strong or powerful enough to form effective lobbying organisations that can bring about change. This is also true for the anti-Christian ‘war on Christmas’. It is implied that Muslims are behind this because they get so offended by Christmas, but what is left out is that Muslims share many of the Christian beliefs. Jesus is regarded as a Messiah in the Koran. It is once again the Jews who are behind this erosion of Christian values, I can think of no other group that hates Christianity to the extent Jews do.

    Going back the the civil rights movement, it is now very easy to verify that Jews were massively represented in it, it is Jews who put strange ideas into Blacks’ heads, most Blacks knew their places and most Blacks prefer to live segregated even to this day.

    I think White people truly believe in equality of opportunity, and non-Whites also believe this, a survey by the Oxford Migration observatory found that 91% of immigrants thought they make it in life if they tried hard enough and that most didn’t experience any racism (the anti-White meme the media keep pushing)

    It is Jews who are causing this strife by pushing for equality of outcome, thereby ignoring basic biology to cause chaos and reap the rewards. It is only expected that two different groups with different levels of intelligence will perform differently. Of course this is 100% anti-White as we never hear about the White-Asian gap. Here in the UK, Chinese and Indians earn more than Whites and do better in education, yet we are constantly told by the media to think about the Black-White gap. The elite institutions of Oxford and Cambridge, where Chinese and Indians are over-represented, are being pressured to take in Blacks at the expense of Whites.

    By all accounts, racism has only been going down, this is why the Jews push to change the definition of hate crime laws so that there is a year on year increase. A decade ago ‘hate crime’ was assaulting someone due to some immutable feature, now it is simply calling them names. They even make up hate crimes like the infamous Jussie Smollet hoax-lynching.

    All I can say is that the Jews have really outdone themselves on this one, first they imported all this diversity and then they use their shekels to fund racial agitation groups.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @KA
  24. Those ignorant of our nation’s history, and especially of Zionist mobilizations in the present, live with the comforting lie that free speech is an inviolable right.

    Today, the Jewish community in the United States, which has wrongfully earned a reputation for harboring civil libertarian views, has been at war with the very concept of the First Amendment.

    –As Mulegino says above: It’s characteristic that they’re in favor of freedom up and until they gain the whip hand. They’re not known for favoring anything resembling freedom when they’re in power. And are they ever in power.

    Brandeis wrote passionately about the moral importance of the free exchange of ideas in a liberal democracy, winning him the reputation as a Jewish pioneer of civil liberties. He was one of the first judges to promote the idea that open debate allows good to triumph over evil.

    –Likely one reason Thomas Jefferson is being unpersonned.. Prominent ‘scholars’ such as Ron Chernow, Michael Aeschliman and of course Paul Finkelman who titled his screed in the NYT “The Monster of Monticello” are perennially at work seeking to besmirch our third president’s good name (along with the other Founding Fathers). Now why would ‘they’ do that? Finkelman tells a fawning PBS interviewer: “Thomas Jefferson invented racism in America.”

    What Jefferson actually dared to say: “We are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.”

    This is a clear and concise defense of free speech. It infuriates them.

    Frankfurter…declared that Beauharnais was guilty of “group-libel” against blacks by referring to their role in the increased crime rate

    –Can you imagine if white people were protected by activist judges? All we dare to dream of is a return to something like a level playing field, as was the case a hundred years ago.

    this author believes conservative anti-environmentalism is absurd

    –this author is worth reading. Lefties don’t care about the environment, unless it’s something they can charge to whites. They’re in favor of billions of Africans and Asians swarming the globe like a plague of locusts.

    A 2017 study by the Cato Institute polled people’s views on free speech across racial lines, finding that Jews were the most likely to favor restrictions on “hate speech” of any ethnic group.

    “Hate Speech” in quotes where it belongs. I’d suggest that we stop using their phrase altogether, and replace it with what it actually is: Free Speech.

  25. awry says:
    @renfro

    They were quite successful in making any outside critique of them as a group a modern heresy, not punished by burning at the stake yet, but by social ostracism. And it’s mostly the non-jews going along with this, guilt-tripped by the Holocaust who make this possible.
    You can question the Moon landings (maybe denying them will become the norm in the future like in the movie Interstellar, I can imagine that a few decades from now the Apollo landings will be called “faked by dead white men” it will be a thing of the past like the current US Constitution will be by then). You can rave about how the CIA killed JFK or whatnot. What you cannot question without losing your job and friends, or even your bank account?

  26. Bert says:

    “Jews are not people smart,”

    They have an enviable average IQ, but very low emotional intelligence. The latter primarily because their mindset is inherently authoritarian. If deception doesn’t achieve their goal, then they resort immediately to force of one kind or another. They clearly do not understand the freedom-loving mindset of the Germanic branch of Indo-Europeans.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  27. @A123

    Florida is fighting back for Free Speech rights:

    You mean, after Gov. DeSantis traveled to Jerusalem to sign Florida House Bill 741, which makes legitimate criticism of Israel and Jewish influence a “hate crime,” and equates the BDS movement with the KKK or ISIS?

    DeSantis Will Sign Anti-Semitism Ban In Jerusalem, BDS Designated As ‘Terrorist Organization’

    It also amends Florida’s hate crime statute to specifically include anti-Semitism, which it defines “as a perception of the Jewish people, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jewish people.” Anti-Semitism includes:

    “Calling for, aiding, or justifying violence against Jews.
    “Alleging myths about a world Jewish conspiracy or that Jews control the media, economy, government, or other institutions.
    “Accusing Jewish people as a whole of being responsible for real or imaginary wrongdoing by a single Jewish person, group, or the state of Israel, or for acts of non-Jews.
    “Accusing the Jewish people of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
    “Accusing Jewish citizens of countries other than Israel of being more loyal to Israel than their own nations.
    “Demonizing, applying a double standard to, or delegitimizing Israel.”

    Even if social media were forced to allow what passes for “hate speech,” it wouldn’t prevent said speech from being prosecuted in Florida.

    Looks like the sole dissenter in the Florida Senate was “vociferously skewered” by her colleagues solely because she’s the only one among them who understood what freedom of speech is about:

    Florida Legislature delivers anti-Semitism law for DeSantis to sign in Jerusalem

    Senate Minority Leader Audrey Gibson, D-Jacksonville, was the only lawmaker to cast a negative ballot against the measure during its committee rounds, objecting to potential freedom of speech challenges – which it is likely to draw – in SB 1272’s one and only committee hearing.

    For that, Gibson was vociferously skewered by Republicans and Democrats and, within two days, had issued change-of-heart statements. … “No one and no people should fear the practice of their religion and the exercising of their faiths; nor should they fear that their places of worship will be targets of hate and terrorism,” Gibson said. “And today I join my colleagues in sending this message on behalf of the Jewish community.”

    And if that wasn’t shameful enough, we have this:

    Sen. Annette Taddeo, D-Miami, said the bill reflects a statement and a consensus. She explained the concept of mitzvah, which is the Hebrew word for a moral deed as commandment of faith.

    “Today we’re doing a mitzvah by passing this bill,” Taddeo said and called on fellow senators to join her in signing on as co-sponsors of the bill.

    What say you, A? Is a bill that criminalizes someone for observing the fact that Jews enjoy outsized control of the media and government a “mitzvah”?

    Shouldn’t Laura Loomer be working to overturn this legislation rather than setting her fellow Floridians up for a fall?

    • Agree: mark green, roonaldo
    • Thanks: Rurik
  28. Rosie says:

    I think it was Greg Johnson who said something to this effect: “Anyone who tries to prevent you from saying anything about them is most likely up to no good.”

    And what’s more: They’re not interested in improving themselves. Good people want to hear what others have to say. Otherwise, you can’t fix whatever it is that is giving offense, if indeed there s something that needs to be fixed.

    • Replies: @S
  29. gotmituns says:

    People my age still say what we want but younger people (under 68 or so), pretty much have no free speech. I do enjoy blurting out stuff in front of people they can’t say.

  30. Mr. Striker,

    What’s your take on the ACLU’s opposition to anti-BDS legislation?

    • Replies: @9/11 Inside job
  31. GMC says:

    And the pre- requisites for much of the racial tensions, and all the ammunition, was the introduction of the 1965 Open Unlimited Unvetted Immigration Laws that completely changed the make up of the US society from a European one – to Todays Heintz 57 mix. And those NY Zionist sponsors of the Bolshevik Revolutions, never quit scheming and thinking of ways to keep continual dissent in every country they can. Those Lawyers that represented the Neo Nazi’s 1st amendment rights, terrorized the elderly Jewish citizens in Skokie, Illinois { a suburb of Chicago } but they could care less, for some old jews – because “our Zionist cause “, will mow down anyone, any country , any honorable Christian ideology , that gets in our way of World Conquest. I remember that Skokie march on the old Jewish community , being a teenager next door in Chicago – since my father worked for a fine Jewish man that had an Electrical contracting bus. on the North side. All this reminds me of todays Zionists that are arming the Neo Nazis in Ukraine – again – as I live just hundreds of miles – where they do. They must be stopped – before they talk an old diseased man like Trump – into something – much more deadly – Thanks Unz Rev.

  32. The pressure from all the associated Jewish Gestapo groups against free speech and freedom of association has already reached the level of suffocation in the US. You only have to look at Europe to see what they’re trying to do in America (just recently the French intellectual and writer Renaud Camus, at the urging of Jewish anti free speech groups, was sentenced to prison for calling the mass illegal immigration into Europe an “invasion”; Ursula Haverbeck, 91-years-old, hauled off in handcuffs and given a two-year prison sentence for peacefully disagreeing with Jewish historical mandates, etc.).

    If Mario Savio (from the 60s Berkeley Free Speech Movement) jumped onto a police car today and delivered his ‘Bodies upon the gears’ speech* he would be immediately demonized by the ruling Jewish media as a white nationalist and a domestic terrorist.

    *“There’s a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can’t take part! You can’t even passively take part! And you’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels … upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you’ve got to make it stop! And you’ve got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you’re free, the machine will be prevented from working at all!”

    Defy tyranny or live like a slave.

  33. Key Figures in the development and implementation of Group Libel and Hate Speech Laws in Britain:

    Harold Lever
    Frank Soskice
    Anthony Lester
    Jim Rose
    Harry Cohen
    Malcolm Rifkind
    Leon Brittan

    All ethnic birds of a feather, so to speak.

  34. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    but by actual Attorney Generals supposedly tasked with upholding civil liberties, like Josh Shapiro.

    Shapiro? Why am I not surprised?

    There are some excellent, intelligent and incisive comments left to this article, again showing why a nation can only be free if our precious right to Free Speech remains free. But I imagine a certain ethnic group which wants to take away most of the Bill of Rights, and in the process, acquire more power, is kvetching about this discussion in the public square.

    All those hate speech laws being formulated, brought forth and pushed by Jews and their loyal Shabbos Goy lackeys, won’t be used to protect Americans from ‘hate,’ but to punish those who dare question the biggest racket in history, the very lucrative holocaust.
    Zionist Jews have been trying to get laws passed that would criminalize Americans who dare to ask historical questions about WWII and have been running into push back from those dedicated to Free Speech, so now they’ll come in the back door and club from behind those who dare to think out-loud.

    The Jews also use their dominance on the Internet to shut down free speech. The three most popular–and biggest–‘Net sites are Google, Facebook and Youtube. ALL owned and run by Jews.
    That they are gutting our precious Bill of Rights is of no concern to our inept DC reps, who are too busy kissing up to the money powers so they can stay in office. Or maybe they’re quiet because they wonder who has that Mossadd honey pot video of them cavorting with an underage girl…or boy.
    Even the quisling Trump, who has complained about their abuse of power, has made no effort to uphold that oath he took to protect and defend the Constitution and our nation from all enemies, both foreign and domestic.

    Or maybe Zion Don used the slick Jew trick of the Kol Nidre to renounce that oath to us Gentiles, which is kosher, as long as you don’t apply that stratagem to the Chosen Ones!

    All vows we are likely to make, all oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kippur and the next Yom Kippur, we publicly renounce. Let them all be relinquished and abandoned, null and void, neither firm nor established. Let our vows, pledges, and oaths be considered neither vows nor pledges nor oaths.

    https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/kol-nidrei-the-power-of-words/

    Wonder if I could take that oath to get our of paying my truck loan?

  35. Herald says:
    @onebornfree

    Striker is absolutely right to make the long overdue battle for free speech the number one priority.

    Without free speech all other aspects of the Constitution are effectively undefendable and will be ignored by governments, whenever it suits their purpose.

    • Agree: Mefobills, follyofwar
  36. Moi says:
    @anarchyst

    Justice Brandeis was working for the Zionist cause while on the Supreme Court. He also worked to get bright young Jews (e.g. Franfurter) into top government positions.

    • Replies: @Andre Citroen
  37. @Andrew Joyce

    Do you have a link to an article with more information if the role of those men in relation to hate speech laws?

    Also, if you are the same Andrew Joyce that writes articles for TOO, how did you manage to get through university without being found out, you recently wrote a piece on White ethnocentrism in which you talked about your personal life, other commenters and I were intrigued about your university years.

    • Replies: @Andrew Joyce
  38. DanFromCT says:
    @getaclue

    Sort of like a union rally I walked by years ago in midtown Manhattan of striking Hispanic hotel workers looking quite uncomfortable chanting in English and lined up across a narrow side street. In the back of that group of a few dozen staged to look like hundreds for the cameras there were several old Jewish women looking for all the world like nasty commissars, using bullhorns to lead the chant and forcefully shoving the Hispanics forward as if the latter were animals of no account. Not much has changed since Marcus Garvey came to NY to visit the NAACP office a hundred years before and found the only people there were Jews.

  39. @AnonStarter

    Sooner or later anti-BDS legislation will reach the Supreme Court and I believe that the ACLU will be one of the groups urging the SCOTUS to uphold the decision in NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. where , according to the ACLU’s website , the Court held that”.. a non-violent , politically motivated boycott is nothing less than an ‘expression on public issues’ which ‘has always rested on the highest rung of the hierarchy of First Amendement values ‘.The same could just as easily be said about the boycotts of Israel targeted by State laws and the ‘Combating BDS Act’”. aclu.org The National Coalition Against Censorship has supported the ACLU’s efforts and published an article “Anti-BDS laws move to Federal Courts -UPDATE Victory for the ACLU “ ncac.org “… the ACLU secured a significant first victory in its legal effort to halt a surge of State anti-BDS laws…”
    Besides the ACLU and the NCAC which groups are actively fighting anti-BDS laws? We need to give them our support as there is no doubt that the First Amendment is under assault and each day censorship and self-censorship in the media is becoming more pervasive .

  40. Maybe the First Amendment will look like mere collateral damage, if this Zionist-led campaign to enshrine highly selective and dubious “hate speech” notions eventually catches on in the United States. Western European courts regularly try people for voicing or writing the wrong opinion on, say, the scourge of borderless immigration or just for challenging some unwritten but official historical doctrine about “The Holocaust”. What is being blatantly outlawed here is really the kind of political expression Americans once took for granted.

    This is normal in Western Europe, where legal principles derive from Roman code law, basically putting current rulers in charge of the current historical narrative, which becomes codified. Underlying some of the Holocaust-denial convictions, for instance, is the idea that long dead victims have somehow been libeled by the defendants. Government gets away with this because its prosecutors and judiciary tacitly assume the authority and standing to represent ghosts as victims of libel. The government conveniently presumes to know that the offending free speech that it dislikes would have insulted dead people, and that’s against the European law.

    In our contrasting system of common law derived from sensible English tradition this is not possible — yet. The basic principles of libel law are that a defense of Truth always defeats a charge of Libel and that one cannot libel the dead, who lack standing in a U.S. court of law. Overturning those bedrock legal principles would soon enable the government to dictate what history is. Historians and scholars beware!

    As Orwell put it, Who controls the past, controls the future; who controls the present, controls the past. That would be not just the end of free speech; it would be the end of political discussion as we know it. This is either the gateway to surfdom or a clear signal for insurrection. Should it happen, Welcome to modern Western Europe.

  41. The ZUS government is totally under zionist control and this started in 1913 when the zionist fastened their privately owned FED on the American people and now we have Trump with an ex order that it is against the law to say anything against the Jews or Israel, this is totally against the 1st amendment and if anything that Trump should be impeached for, it is this.

    Zionists are destroying America.

  42. A123 says:
    @AnonStarter

    NONstarter;

    You do not get to silence people who care about freedom by shouting “Islamophobe” at them.

    Tough break.

    PEACE 😇

    • LOL: AnonStarter
    • Replies: @barr
  43. Truth3 says:
    @Parfois1

    What’s the point?

    What’s the point? Jews are monolithic evil, across centuries, across continents.

    Good enough for you? Or you want to defend the indefensible again?

    • Agree: Desert Fox
  44. Truth3 says:
    @Parfois1

    You’re a liar. Bordering on sophistry.

    No… you’re a sophist too.

    Glad to get that right.

  45. anarchyst says:
    @Just passing through

    Your comment:

    “All I can say is that the Jews have really outdone themselves on this one, first they imported all this diversity and then they use their shekels to fund racial agitation groups” bears merit, but jews have been sowing the seeds of racial agitation for generations, and is a good description of the situation we live under today…

    I came of age during the first so-called “civil-rights” movement and saw for myself the underhanded dealings, the demonization of decent, law-abiding whites, and in general, the deterioration of civil society.

    Almost all of the “civil-rights” workers and demonstration “handlers” were of one persuasion–New York based leftist communist jews. They cared not one wit about true “civil rights”, but were there to create hate and discontent among their black charges (who were too stupid or naive to see that they were being used to suborn and destroy legitimate government and society)–a favorite communist tactic.

    These New York-based jew “carpetbaggers” fomented their hate and discontent, only to become future “civil-rights” attorneys, race-hustlers, and America-hating leftist communists…and the ADL and $PLC being invented.

    Those of us whites who were in the middle of this “civil-rights” revolution had a saying: “Behind every negro, there is a jew”. No truer words were ever spoken.

    Let’s not forget their infestation of the nation’s education and entertainment systems, (which continues to the present day), in which they can spread their jewish supremacist poison.

    The so-called “non-violent civil-rights demonstrations” were anything but “non-violent”. Robberies, rapes, and other criminal acts were common, but never reported, as even the “mainstream media” was “in on the game” and conveniently turned off their cameras during the acts of violence. You see, even then,”creating crises” was a part of the agenda.

    The “beginning of the end” of America was the use of federal troops against white Americans, which, in itself was a violation of “posse comitatus”–the prohibition on the use of federal troops for domestic “law enforcement” purposes. As most whites were (and still are) law-abiding, they (we) were “steamrollered” by the use of federal troops to crush honest dissent. We never recovered from those unconstitutional actions. It was all downhill from there…

    Regards,

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  46. @AnonStarter

    WOW!
    Great response! You know your stuff…

    • Thanks: AnonStarter
  47. @A123

    $75k is shoeshine change to these companies.

    • Replies: @A123
  48. @Wally

    …imprisoned for questioning the “Holocaust”

    Only lies require censorship.

    In light of all the information and references you have provided here on this topic, and in view of all the current commemoration ceremonies – for instance today in Jerusalem, next Monday in many other places, deriving from a UN decree – that draw public attention to this narrative, including speeches that are usually accompanied by the exhortation “Never Again!“, which is a slogan that was popularized by the Jewish Defense League – classified as “a right wing terrorist group” by the FBI in 2001 – based on the title of a best-selling book first published in 1972 by its founder, Meir Kahane (Never Again! A Program for Survival), why don’t you just simply refer to it as the “Wholly-Holy-Hoax“?

    • Replies: @Wally
  49. Good article. Although our whole Constitution is being eviscerated, the role the jews have played in Western history to undermine Christianity and other important principles of Europe and America need to be broadcast until they are openly talked about.

  50. KA says:
    @Just passing through

    “ It is implied that Muslims are behind this because ”

    CNN FOX NYT WSJ LA TIMES CHICAGO TRIBUNE MSNBC NEWYORK POST DAILY CALLER POLITICO THE HILL -none has Muslim presence and when one has ,it has nothing of any importance outside travel,culture,or Muslim ban or stock market future . Some has written on Kashmir and Burma.
    DC has no Muslim in Trump administration , none was in Obama or Bush or Clinton.
    There was no and there is no Muslim senator .
    Muslim has no billionaire among themselves in US or Canada . No person with the power and connections and lobbying connection with front shell political companies , like the stature of Haim Saban , Adelshon, Marcus, Singer have Muslim heritage . No Friedman no Judith Miller or Sanger or Gordon , no AEI no Hudson Institute ,no PNAC or Emergency Committee for Israel have any Muslim presence or Arab presence where one can say even with remote shadow of probability that American interests are being harmed by kowtowing to Arab or Muslim unless we include Muslim killing Muslim for last 40 years for America for short term American interest but for long term disasters .

    Did Muslim money prevent Gulf war2003 war , Gaza war, ? Did Arab get US make Israel follow Oslo.?Did Saudi get America force Israel accept American long standing peace plan? Did Arab get Port Authority or Muslim get Park 51 mosque site or roll back Muslim ban or get PA funding or stop embassy transfer( US to Jerusalem ) and embassy closure ( PA ‘s office ) ?
    Could Muslim prevent Sudan breaking into 2, East Timor leaving .?
    Could Muslim prevent Modi of India getting away with planned murders in India?
    Could Muslim affect the ethnic cleansing of Mynamar or potential ethnic cleansing in India. ? Did Muslim in US administration event talk about Modi? No. There was none.

    Muslim knows that in US and Canada ,a force is working to create Islamophobia of the nature one sees in Israel,Australia,Hungary and India and what was seen before in UK-USA when Balfour Churchill Truman administration with evangelicals were trying to present Arab as nothing but sexually obsessed anti Christian animal .
    This force is composed of Jewish money,Jewish value, Jewish political requirements to get to where it wants to go .

    So why are the Jewish force portraying certain anti white thing as Muslim inspired ? Is it because the polemic of Muslim being anti American had worked very well ? So why aren’t they using “America “ any more .?
    Is it because America as a concept has come under attack from the same source ?
    They are not using anti Christian trope either . That anti Christianity worked very well from 1900 to 1960s . Zionist used it . Now that is limited to Evangelical only . Only they believe in this fight between Muslim and Christian . But the fight has been discarded by the Zionist and handed over to the ISIS and Evangekical freeing the Jewish master of any partisanship allowing them to influence both .

    There is a shift also from Sunni to ShiaThere is shift from ISIS Al Quida to Shia . Again these shifts are orchestrated by Jews . Arab countries from fear of exposure of their stupid roles ( controlled by Zionist) in911 and from fear of exposure of the sexual perversion ,murders,corruptions have moved to the Zionist camp . Just like Epstein controlled operations have kept the leash on Clinton Royal famines on media on celebrities .

    Muslims don’t have power . Neither has Evangekicals.

    Two slaves are fighting like the gladiators for the visual and auditory stimulation of the Zionist emperor in new Rome- DC .

    Evangelical voters bring Zionidt to power in DC
    Muslim Arab can open the prison and throw the madrassa students out and force them join ISIS

    Voters and cannon fodders can realize the next Zionist dream again and again and again until
    like Great Britan ,America finds itself destitute war torn fatigued confused and unable to secure the realms while origin of it might lie in PNAC documents : securing the realms . Israel will need evangelical . It did not need Balfour or Lloyd or Churchill in 1947 .
    By that time Israel is again ready to be declared to be the master from Morocco to Pakistan . Just like Zionist was ready to declare statehood on the back of the dying corpse of UK and France and on the hungry belly of Truman’s presidency in 1948.

    This time the hungry belly of Truman will be given a short shrift and sent to pasture long sunset with a kick in the teeth by the Zionist . Will it find new host ? It may not need . It will be the host and that might be best outcome for humanity .

    • Replies: @KA
  51. @anarchyst

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-adl-in-american-society/

    The above article by Ron Unz details the circumstances around the formation of the now infamous Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith.

    It shows how when it comes to saving one of their own (in this case child rapists, murderer and Jew Leo Frank) Jews will throw their Black pets under the bus.

  52. @gotmituns

    Boomers are the most philosemitic generation out there, most of them actually believe that Jews are the Chosen People and support for Israel is highest amongst boomers.

    https://m.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/US-public-support-for-Israel-at-near-record-highs-363051

    The older the Americans, the more likely they are to sympathize with the Jewish state. That figure reaches 60% for the 65+ age group, and goes down to 44% among those aged 18 to 29. The younger age group also has the most sympathy for the Palestinians at 22%.

    Stick to complaining about the kids on your lawn old man, zoomers are the future.

    • Replies: @gotmituns
  53. @Just passing through

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/03/09/free-speech-jewish-activism-and-the-trial-of-jeremy-bedford-turner/

    As for your question, there’s no mystery – You keep your mouth shut and live a lie. But I never had an academic career. I took my scroll and by choice walked out the door into working class invisibility. You still live the lie. It’s a soul destroying necessity that people in all walks of life have to endure. As for that user’s other comments, I think he overestimates the cost of cheap package vacations around Europe, and the cost of staying with family in the US. I grew up in poverty, and if I’m now middle class someone needs to send my bank balance a memo. I work hard, more than one job. Writing for KMac is purely for sanity. If people read my stuff, great. If not, great. I could be a professor or a plumber, one guy or three, it doesn’t matter. What matter are the essays themselves, and maybe even they don’t matter. And that wouldn’t bother me one bit. I’m no more interesting than you. I’m entertained and enlightened more by the comments sections of TOO and Unz than anywhere else. I’m just an anon who writes really long shitposts with footnotes.

  54. simpleman says:
    @barr

    Cotton will be the president in a few years.

    • Replies: @FLgeezer
  55. Cowboy says:

    Re: Bill of Rights
    Let’s remember the great anti federalist Patrick Henry called for this only after the confounded constitution was certain to pass. It was assumed during the time of liberty before the constitution that all rights resided with the individual and there was no reason for a bill of rights because it was assumed. The consolidation of power in the constitution immediately put those liberties in peril. So thank Henry today for what few liberties you have and mourn what could have been.
    “If you make the citizens of this country agree to become the subjects of one great consolidated empire of America, your government will not have sufficient energy to keep them together. Such a government is incompatible with the genius of republicanism. There will be no checks, no real balances, in this government. What can avail your specious, imaginary balances, your rope-dancing, chain-rattling, ridiculous ideal checks and contrivances?”

  56. melpol says:

    Freedom of speech has become a tool for ending the rights of a high achieving minority. Guilt should not be cast on an innocent minority who have earned the right for their social status and wealth. Focusing hatred on the Ashkenazi Jews by the wrongful use of free speech must be ended. High social and financial achievements are the pillar of a free society. Freedom of speech is being hijacked to punish a high achieving Jewish minority. Expressing jealous wrath is the worse use of free speech.

    • Troll: awry
  57. S says:
    @Rosie

    Good people want to hear what others have to say. Otherwise, you can’t fix whatever it is that is giving offense, if indeed there s something that needs to be fixed.

    Yes, no one’s perfect.

    Constructive criticism (note: not bashing) to build up the other and, or, bring about correction, is an absolute necessity to maintain healthy relationships between both individuals and groups.

    Without a person (or group) allowing for this periodic correction they can easily become a danger to both themselves and others. They can become like the ship, which having lost it’s steering, threatens the other ocean going traffic before striking a reef and finally breaking up.

    In other words, even the best of people(s) need a figurative ‘kick in the pants’ on occassion.

  58. Adûnâi says:
    @Parfois1

    True. I expected @Mulegino1 to provide the destruction of the USSR via subversive “pro-freedom” activities as an example of Jews’ ruining an anti-Jewish country by making it more “free”… But of course not.

    The USSR will forever be remembered (if not ignored) by Neo-Nazis as a bastion of evil “Judaeo-Bolsheviks”, facts be damned. There is a limited amount of points one can assign to breaking psychic taboos – enough to start loving Hitler (even in places where one shouldn’t), not enough to start respecting Stalin.

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  59. @Andrew Joyce

    Thanks for the reply. Writing articles or in the majority of cases, simply commenting does seem to be a catharsis. Which does beg the question as to whether all this is just a sort of pressure valve, I could have sworn there were more real nationalist rallies and events in real life back in the day (up to and including the early noughties) here in the UK, nowadays we get at best, a Tommy Robinson march. I personally don’t think the future looks good from a nationalist point of view, the Brits are by far the most tolerant in Europe and the other European national populist parties are being co-opted by American Neoconservatives.

    I’ve gone off on a tangent but what I find most shocking is how few people voted for the BNP in 2010. They even had Nick Griffin on Question Time and the episode was watched by 8m people, an unsurpassed record, and yet only 500,000 people voted BNP?

    All I can say is, the phrase ‘We were never asked’ is not true. The British public were asked in 2010 and 98% of them said yes to mass immigration.

    • Replies: @Andrew Joyce
  60. A123 says:
    @Jim bob Lassiter

    $75k is shoeshine change to these companies.

    True. Which is why the bill calls for:

    …at least $75,000 in damages.

    The minimum would do little, but the door is open to much higher amounts.

    PEACE 😇

  61. @melpol

    Jews have certainly achieved much in the hard sciences, but unfortunately beyond that, their influence has been entirely negative. Social sciences have been corrupted, foreign wars have been launched on their behalf and they find racial agitation groups to undermine society.

    If Jews fan get away with it then they have earned the right by natural law. But there is no compulsions for the goyim to keep their mouth shut.

    It doesn’t matter who is inferior or superior, it is about self-interest. Jews have earned their wealth almost entirely through seedy means. The entire concept of money favours the Jews as they control the Fed and can print money whenever the like. Jews own nothing of value and they do not plough and took away on the land.

    This is why Jews were so scared of Hitler. He wasn’t ‘exterminating’ them from the get go, he was actually quite cooperative, what he did do was call the Jewish money bluff holding the German people slaves.

    • Agree: Desert Fox
    • Replies: @melpol
  62. Will these hate speech laws apply to Jewish slander against Gentiles?

    For example, I read an article claiming that if you believe in limited government you’re a White supremacist. Obviously this is a logical fallacy but that didn’t stop the Jewish writer and editor from printing it.

    What about misrepresenting racial hate crimes? Is that hate speech? If 85% of Black/White interracial violent crime is Black on White then media reports should reflect this.

    It’s time for Whites to go on the offensive and start calling out the Jew for their bigotry and slander. The weaponization of the media and Hollywood has gone on for too long.

  63. @Just passing through

    It’s absolutely a pressure valve. The Internet has been the best thing ever for White Nationalism, and at the same time the worst thing ever for it. Without political organization it’s all semi-reduntant venting, and I don’t exclude myself from that condemnation. It seems to perform a mental health function, a social function of sorts, and little more.

    The BNP vote didn’t shock me so much because right when the British public wanted to register a massive protest vote, UKIP miraculously appeared as a “respectable” way to do it. BNP couldn’t come up with an effective counter-strategy and then basically collapsed. I’ll always maintain that Thatcher killed the National Front, UKIP killed BNP, and now Trump has suffocated the Alt Right. The biggest threat to the far right has always been those who appear ideologically closer rather than distant.

    Throw in the speech-gagging activities of our Hebraic friends, as outlined by Mr Striker above, and you have quite the political straitjacket to try to escape from.

    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt
    , @Wielgus
    , @S
  64. melpol says:
    @Just passing through

    Natural Law is a Jews best friend, it accepts him being in the winners circle. But Natural Law also accepts a Goys right to criticize that law. Meanwhile Jews will continue winning all the achievement awards for social status and finance.

  65. Everyone loves “free speech”. But unlimited “free speech”, with no controls, will lead directly to another Holocaust. The Nazis were big fans of so called “free speech” and as can be seen on the History Channel, that “free speech” drove them to kill 6 million Jews and 5 million non-Jews in the gas chambers.

    I’m confident most Unz readers are willing to sacrifice “free speech” in order to avoid such terrible suffering and loss of life.

    • Replies: @renfro
  66. @melpol

    Well, I suppose if there is one thing I can admire about Jews, it is their adherence to Natural Law, when National Socialism came into the scene the Jews sensed competition and so the NS has to be destroyed.

    Jews know everything they have including their life, is a privilege and not a right. This is why they have consolidated control every single monopoly. You won’t be hearing about Jews complaining about social media censorship anytime soon that’s for sure, while the baby WNs will complain about how Jewish owned platforms are banning them for opposing…Jews (lol)

  67. Greg Bacon says: • Website
    @Parfois1

    A123, er, I mean Parfois, how about your hero, Uncle Joe making anti-Semitism punishable by death?

    Stalin’s 1931 condemnation of antisemitism

    National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.

    Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.

    In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.

    J. Stalin
    January 12, 1931

    https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1931/01/12.htm

    If you want to wallow around in the ancient Soviet criminal code, feel free to find a riposte to my reply and prove me wrong.

    • Replies: @Parfois1
  68. Vaterland says:
    @Parfois1

    Two points:

    You cannot win a civil war without people’s support; after all, a civil war is a people’s war.

    The Bolsheviks won to two major factors: they used the red terror and systematic indoctrination, like Mao, to greater effect, the white army came way too late to the game. And as after WW 1 the motivation on the Russian side to fight for the old, defeated regime was low. Also: the October Revolution and the wars in Russia were hardly a pure civil war, but much like the 30 years war a combination of invasion, social revolution, unrest and clandestine revenge. This is pretty much mainstream history even.

    The admiration for Stalin and the nostalgia for the Soviet Union is, of course, worrisome. But understandable. Russia can go either way. Integration into Europe with a booming middle class, rule of law, patent security and rising innovations; or form a reactionary quasi neo Stalin-Mao axis with Xi Jinping, if this is also what he has in mind, but Russia becoming the junior partner this time.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  69. @melpol

    It is one thing I can admire about Jews, their adherence to Natural Law, this is why National Socialism had to be crushed as it represented a similar system to what the Jews used, finally the Goyim had discovered the long lost secret of Natural Law!

    White people are very dogmatic I find, they believe a lot in ‘rights’ as opposed to privileges. Everything we have is a privilege that can be taken away at any time including our life. Jews have learned this the hard way. It was essential for Jews to wrest control of various essential industries so they could pursue their goals relatively unmolested. You won’t find Jews complaining about social media censorship because their co-ethnic own the social media. The monopoly of whining about getting banned from Twitter will belong the the White nationalists, who have so far not managed to come up with a system of their own and so much like Blacks, whine about it.

    Jewish victory was consolidated after WW2, since then we have been living in the Jewish century and it is likely this will be extended into the Jewish millenium. There will only be a small band of intelligent dissenters left who are on the right-hand side of the bell curve, but these won’t pose a problem. It is like one sheep out of a 1000 bleating about the wolf while the rest look on in puzzlement and complete disregard for reality.

    • Replies: @melpol
  70. Mulegino1 says:
    @Parfois1

    It is you who are a liar.

    In answer to your inquiry :

    National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.

    Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.

    In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.

    J. Stalin
    January 12, 1931

    Talk about bullshit! And you wonder why we refer to Judeo-Bolsheviks!

    The only thing that made Stalin turn the USSR from the course of the total annihilation of Christianity was the last Great Crusade of European Christendom, i.e., Operation Barbarossa. No true Christian would fight for the Jew dominated USSR. They would, however, fight for Christian Russia.

    First published in the newspaper Pravda, No. 329, November 30, 1936

    • Replies: @Derer
  71. @Andrew Joyce

    Hi Andrew. Great to have you with us. Your writing and analytical skills are first-rate. Many of your articles have achieved ‘classic’ status. You have made an impact and you are still making one. You should be proud of your achievements.

    On behalf of the readers here and at TOO, thank you, sir.

    • Agree: geokat62
    • Replies: @Andrew Joyce
  72. Wally says:
    @Been_there_done_that

    said:
    ” why don’t you just simply refer to it as the “Wholly-Holy-Hoax“?”

    While I agree that it is an entirely fabricated fraud, I prefer the to-the-point language I use and its implications. I use the quotes as in “holocaust” with the lower case ‘h’ as it not only lowers it’s ‘holy’ status, it ridicules it as well.

    You and others here will enjoy these video examples of what “eyewitnesses” really say:
    Holohoax Tales: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12988

    See them say they “witnessed” such things as:
    – FORCED TO IMPERSONATE ROOSTERS UNTIL THEY FELL OUT OF TREE
    – MACHINE GUNNED JEWS SOLD AS MEAT
    – BONE DEEP WOUNDS HEALED WITH PISS
    – SAW HUMAN SOAP AND LAMPSHADES
    – GAS CHAMBER SLIDES FOR THE ELDERLY
    and much more:
    the so called ‘Holocaust’ / theatre of the absurd: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=66

  73. Agent76 says:

    Jan 23, 2020 Unconstitutional Virginia Red Flag Gun Ban Law Passes!

    So they did it anyway, and that shouldn’t surprise you! Lawmakers are not interested in what you need, what you want, or what your rights are or should be!

    Jan 21, 2020 Rich Liberals Protected By Guns…Why Not The Rest Of Us?

    Yesterday’s Virginia pro-Second Amendment rally shocked the elites to their core.

    • Agree: Republic
  74. It’s absolutely a pressure valve. The Internet has been the best thing ever for White Nationalism, and at the same time the worst thing ever for it. Without political organization it’s all semi-reduntant venting, and I don’t exclude myself from that condemnation. It seems to perform a mental health function, a social function of sorts, and little more.

    Debt and demography are going to dislodge ruling classes all over the European Christian world and the Internet has made it possible for people of a sensibility that demands some integrity of worldview to plan for what happens when the ruling classes are toppled. The ruling classes in the American Empire and Germany and Canada and France and Italy and New Zealand and Sweden and Australia and Denmark and Norway and many other ruling classes are going to be removed from power.

    As I write the globalized central bank shysters are in the last ditch of monetary extremism with the Bank of China and the Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank and the Bank of England all doing everything they can to keep the asset bubbles in stocks and bonds and real estate inflated, and when those asset bubbles pop is when the ANCESTRAL CORE NATIONS will dislodge their ruling classes from power.

    Was Nigel Farage a City of London striver commodities broker who used UKIP and then the Brexit Party to freeze out more forthright proponents of ancestral core nationalism? Yup!

    Is the only thing holding England together the Bank of England and foreigners laundering loot through England? Yup!

    White Core America and the True English Core are going to win and the victory has only been delayed by monetary extremism.

    Debt and demography is the game.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  75. @Andrew Joyce

    Throw in the speech-gagging activities of our Hebraic friends, as outlined by Mr Striker above, and you have quite the political straitjacket to try to escape from.

    I wrote this about the JEW QUESTION and FREE SPEECH on January 18 2020:

    This brings up the JEW QUESTION and I believe that retired professor Kevin MacDonald has written extensively about how the JEW NATION and its adherents and occupants absolutely DO NOT have any ancestral reverence or appreciation for FREE SPEECH. In fact, the denizens of the JEW NATION have an intense desire to stifle free speech, especially as it pertains to the JEW QUESTION in European Christian nations and in regards to matters concerning Israel.

    JEW QUESTION defined to illuminate the above reference further:

    Jews form a nation within a nation everywhere they reside. Can Jews ever be considered to be part of the larger nation in which they reside when they are genetically and culturally predisposed to put the interests of the Jew Nation over and above the interests of the larger nations in which they reside?

    https://www.unz.com/anepigone/killing-free-speech/#comment-3667482

  76. @Charles Pewitt

    As long as people trust the paper money they handle, nothing big will happen. I love when people talk about ‘bubbles’ and the ‘incoming economic collapse’ like they know why they are talking about.

    The whole system is a fraud, it relies on people having trust in it and I would say 99% of people don’t understand where money comes from.

    The elites have only grown stronger since the end of WW2. It really doesn’t look like collapse is coming anytime soon. People need to read the history of the Roman Empire and it’s fall. The ‘collapse’ wasn’t some discrete event but rather it was continuous, most Romans didn’t accept their Empire was gone.

    This recent surge in nationalism seems farcical to me, as Eric Striker noted on his National Justice blog, a lot of the National Populist parties are being co-opted by American Neocons.

    Despite Paris resembling the Congo in some parts, French people voted in a former Rothschild banker as president. It is tragic.

    I see America being little urban islands of immigrants in a sea of White strongholds. Most America’s are pretty atomised and the ‘idea’ of America rather than the ‘nation’ of America will continue for a long time, much like the idea of Rome outlived the nation.

    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt
  77. Wielgus says:
    @Andrew Joyce

    In 1979, many NF-inclined voted Conservative after Thatcher gave the impression she was concerned about immigration. The NF also overstretched itself by standing 303 candidates in an era when parliamentary candidates needed to pay a 150 pound sterling deposit which they lost if they got less than 12.5% of the vote in the constituency. Every NF deposit was lost, enough to damage the party financially, and it largely fell apart within a year.

    • Replies: @Andrew Joyce
  78. annamaria says:
    @Bert

    “They clearly do not understand the freedom-loving mindset of the Germanic branch of Indo-Europeans.”
    — The most obnoxious among the big Jewish mouths of today are from the low-grade stock of east-European shtetles. It is hopeless to expect either superior intelligence or exceptional morality from the progeny of the heavily inbred population. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01427.x

    … a population with a small number of founding members, one of whom carries a genetic mutation, increases in size but the population remains closed so the mutation is maintained at a higher frequency (Burchard et al. 2003). Ashkenazi Jews are one such population…

    Ashkenazi Jews are those who originate from Central or Eastern Europe. Although they are now dispersed throughout the world, approximately 80 per cent of the world’s Jewish population is of Ashkenazi origin (Markel 1997).

    So much for the “antisemitism” canard.

  79. @mark green

    Thanks Mark. I follow your comments a lot. You talk a lot of sense.

  80. @Wielgus

    Yeah, this sounds about right. £150 x 303 in the 70s was suicidal. I had no idea about the financial side of things. In any event, Thatcher brought her anti-immigration rhetoric (and like Trump it was only rhetoric) into play, and basically wiped the floor. Hindsight is 20/20. I just can’t get my head around how we keep playing the same game.

  81. @AnonStarter

    The U$A is getting more Jewish by the minute. Even bills passed in the U$A don’t get signed in the U$A!

    BDS as a terrorist organization? Well, I must be a terrorist as by business has BDS as policy. And since the U$A pro-ISRAEL IDIOTS pushing for criminalization of anything they don’t like, I am adding the U$A to the BDS motion.

  82. melpol says:
    @Just passing through

    It was not only successful Jews who followed the laws of the jungle, it was also the successful Italians who belonged to the Mafia. Jews had no rights or privileges as they were led away to die, neither were the American Indians. There is an invisible black hand that dominates all human relationships, call it Natural Law. The weak follow their wealthy and powerful masters and hope that they are not falsely accused and punished. The homely or unattractive are scorned by beautiful whores.

  83. gotmituns says:
    @Just passing through

    I’m not a boomer. I’m older than that and I assure you I don’t support israel.

  84. renfro says:
    @Just another serf

    But unlimited “free speech”, with no controls, will lead directly to another Holocaust.

    Nope…….Jews doing what they do would lead to a holocaust. ……hate speech against Jews as the Jews define it is simply people observing and talking about what Jews or the zionist if you please, have done and are doing.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @melpol
  85. FLgeezer says:
    @simpleman

    >Cotton will be president in a few years.

    Very likely true but it won’t be we goy pickin’ Cotton.

  86. @Just passing through

    If the privately-controlled Federal Reserve Bank were to raise the federal funds rate to the normal level of 6 percent and stop the liquidity infusions and shrink the Fed’s balance sheet, then the asset bubbles in stocks, bonds and real estate would implode immediately.

    The JEW/WASP ruling class in the American Empire is clamping down on FREE SPEECH because the JEW/WASP ruling class knows that the monetary extremism jig is up and the European Christian ancestral core of the USA will be coming to power soon.

    The attacks on free speech on the Internet and in the corporate media are a response to the upcoming global financial implosion.

  87. Anonymous[296] • Disclaimer says:
    @barr

    In America for the past 30 years there is nothing more virtuous than to be a military veteran, especially if deployed to the MidEast. Nothing shows fealty to the oligarchs like putting your life on the line for their globalist interests.


    Senator Tom Cotton (R- Israel)


    Congressman Seth Moulton (D-MA)


    Senator Tammy Duckworth (D- IL)


    Congressman Dan Crenshaw (R- Israel)

    • Agree: Dannyboy
    • Replies: @Dannyboy
  88. Dannyboy says:

    You wanna hear my favorite “free speech” olde tyme saying?

    Political power grows from the barrel of a gun.

    • Replies: @Parfois1
  89. Agent76 says:

    Jan 23, 2020 Banksters Warn of Green Swan Collapse Unless They Get A Carbon Tax

    Welcome to New World Next Week — the video series from Corbett Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source intelligence news.

    • Replies: @Desert Fox
  90. KA says:
    @KA

    “where one can say even with remote shadow of probability that American interests are being harmed by kowtowing to Arab or Muslim unless we include Muslim killing Muslim for last 40 years for America for short term American interest but for long term disasters”

    Should read as

    even with remote shadow of probability that American interests are being harmed by not kowtowing to Arab or Muslim …”

    Even suggesting that US interests are hurt would be seen as bad advice influenced by zealotry ,hatred and lack of development on the part of Muslim.

  91. StupidNet says:

    Article is utter garbage. Unreadable claptrap. Full of conjecture, straw arguments and nonsense. If this is the Unz can do – then I won’t be back.

  92. @Andrew Joyce

    As I recall, Margret Thatcher was quite popular with Jews, she was first elected MP for the constituency of Finchley which was and still is heavily Jewish. Apparently her family had taken in an Austrian Jewish girl refugee and this is when Margret Thatcher became philosemitic. There is even a book about this with a rather humourous title.

    In regards to your comment about immigration and rhetoric, the public have not yet learned to be smart about these things. They rely to much on emotion which is why many still delude themselves into thinking the Tories are the Party of Law and Order, a politicians can just make a few tub-thumping statements and gain a following.

    The BNP were the last hope, from what I could gather, they were the real deal, I doubt they could have got away with forced repatriation but they certainly would have shut down all immigration and set up a voluntary repatriation program where immigratns and their descendents could receive cash to leave to a country of their choosing. Of course they would also make conditions as uncomfortable for alien cultures as possible while staying within the basic laws.

    I am still puzzled why a nationalist party has still not come onto the scene in the UK, UKIP always struck me as more libertarian than nationalists. Where is out version of AfD, FN or Lega? It looks like we are in for many more years of Conservative rule, of course they will only seek to conserve the profits of the globalists.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Parfois1
  93. melpol says:
    @renfro

    Jews are not bogged down with sermon on the mount or other niceties, they do what has to be done to become successful. Call it Pragmatism or Natural Law. Goys expect Jews to play dumb and be led to the gas chamber. But today’s Jews know what’s on the minds of the Goy and will do what is necessary to stay alive. Goys have laid down a gauntlet for the Jews, but the Jew can be punched and pounded and he will keep going until the finish line.

    • Replies: @anon
  94. @Agent76

    The deep state is spraying America with chemtrails containing nano particles of aluminum and barium and strontium and to allow the atmosphere to be ionized by sending microwaves from HAARP transmitters to heat the atmosphere to be able to move storm fronts to cause droughts and floods and hurricanes and tornadoes in selected areas and blaming all of this on globalwarming.

    This all part of the UN Agenda 21/2030 to deindustrialize America and lower our standard of living back a 100 years , this is an elite scam to break what is left of the middle class back to serfdom.

    See these sites, geoengineeringwatch.org, earthpulse.com, educate-yourself.org, chemtrailplanet.com, globalskywatch.com, stopthecrime.net, elanafreeland.com, and here in Montana they are spraying everyday and it is going into the air we breath and the water we drink and the soil we grow our crops in and the most important thing is it is killing the bees and the insects and changing our world for the worse.

    • Agree: Agent76
    • Replies: @Agent76
  95. Trinity says:

    Kind of ironic that (((these people))) had and still have no problem with Jewish or nonwhite professors spewing hate-filled rants about Whites to impressionable youngsters in colleges and universities for 60 plus years and counting. (((These people))) also had or have no problem with movies vilifying Germans and White Southerners. Germans of the WWII era are depicted as murderous, blood thirsty, cold, and ruthless monsters, while White Southerners are portrayed as incestuous, racist, and toothless neanderthals. lmao. (((They))) are always SELF PROJECTING their behavior on others are they not? We all know that incest is far more common in the Middle East, Central and South America, Africa, and other nonwhite communities than it is among Whites in the Deep South.

    We also know that the old Soviet Union was the first nation that enforced laws against “anti-Semitism.” We must have the same tribe running our country that ran the old Soviet Union back in the day, do you think so? hahaha.

    (((These people))) that look to take away your First Amendment rights in the year 2020 are the (((same people))) who USED the First Amendment to push anti-White propaganda in our schools, in movies in textbooks, and peddle pornography for the last 60 plus years. And now that historical lies are being EXPOSED along with present day lies, (((they))) want to shut it down. hahaha.

  96. S says:
    @Andrew Joyce

    The BNP vote didn’t shock me so much because right when the British public wanted to register a massive protest vote, UKIP miraculously appeared as a “respectable” way to do it.

    BNP voters got suckered into voting for UKIP just as the Irish Republican Army (IRA) got suckered into going Marxist many years before that. A black hole for both.

    It’s the power of the Big Lie!

    Broadly speaking, would either group have fallen for the deception of the Capitalist/Communist, Conservative/Liberal, Right/Left, faux ‘progressive’ Hegelian Dialectic in place since 1776 and 1789, if they had realized that Anglo-Saxon Founding Fathers of the United States had been quite involved in this dialectic’s overall creation?

    And that since that time behind both Capitalist and Communist global revolution one will often find London acting as something like a central clearing house?

    Many know Thomas Jefferson wrote the US Declaration of independence. How many know that in cooperation with the Abbé Sieyès and the Marquis de Lafayette that in 1789 he (Thomas Jefferson) also produced the French Revolution’s seminal Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen?

    Similarly, many are aware Thomas Paine wrote Common Sense for the American Revolution. How many know that Paine also wrote the book The Rights of Man for the French Revolution, and served in it’s revolutionary National Assembly in 1792 besides?

    Likewise, quite a few are cognizant that the deservedly renowned Ben Franklin was a signer of the Declaration of independence. According to Fon Belcher, an apparent distant relation of the British heavyweight North American colonial official Jonathan Belcher, and a person who seems to know whereof he speaks, Franklin as the US minister to France during the first half of the 1780’s, was like Jefferson, majorly involved in preparing the groundwork for the French Revolution.

    Sounds a bit far fetched even to me at times.

    A person might say the 1776 Revolution created an impassable rift between the US and UK, making such a cooperative scenario highly unlikely, and that a purported impenetrable divide has long been said to exist between British and continental based Freemasonry, also tending to preclude such cooperation.

    No doubt the fighting men of both the nascent United States and the British Empire displayed real valor during the 1776 Revolution. However, what if the Revolution had been ultimately a planned strategic false split between the US and UK, for powerful [ie London based Whig party] elements within the Empire and their own purposes?..ie that the 1776 Revolution had been ‘thrown’ by the British Empire to the United States?

    Irregardless, since 1900 and the formation of the ‘special relationship’, the US and UK for practical purposes has been back together, about as long as they had officially been apart.

    As for the supposed almost impermeable veil between the two major manifestations of Freemasonry within Europe, with reason to greatly exaggerate this split, perhaps the veil is not quite so impermeable as we’ve been led to believe.

    Within the present multi-cultural paradigm, it’s also useful to realize that any identity based group, including peoples such as what is termed ‘First Nations’ in North America, if they truly wish to maintain their physical and cultural autonomy/identity, are ultimately seen as Nazis!(TM). For now it is useful for the powers that be that these tribes be left alone as they are, in time they will most likely go after them too.

    Would a far better awareness of the very real possibility of the present right/left dialectic having been historically artificially contrived by the US/UK for control purposes have helped the BNP would be voters and IRA membership, amongst many others, from being taken in?

    Maybe.

    One thing is for sure, it couldn’t have hurt.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_the_Rights_of_Man_and_of_the_Citizen

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Paine

    http://www.belcherfoundation.org/trilateral_center.htm

  97. Dannyboy says:
    @Anonymous

    Except very few if any actually put their life on the line.

    The vast majority of the military are support personal. That’s the case even in wartime. And I mean real war.

  98. barr says:
    @A123

    Give me an example where people have been silenced from being labeled as islamophobe?
    Plenty of people have lost government jobs and private jobs by being accused of being anti Semite

    • Replies: @A123
  99. Agent76 says:

    January 23, 2020 Ten Best Messages for Waging Peace

    The rapid response to US war moves against Iran has been an exciting start toward rebuilding the anti-war movement we so desperately need.

    https://www.counterpunch.org/author/richmose0011/

  100. Agent76 says:
    @Desert Fox

    I have this information so you can share these with others who will not believe you.

    October 10, 2018 Weather Warfare: Beware the US Military’s Experiments with Climatic Warfare

    ‘Climatic warfare’ has been excluded from the agenda on climate change.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/weather-warfare-beware-the-us-military-s-experiments-with-climatic-warfare/7561

    Dec 21, 2014 Chemtrails the secret war

    “This documentary is dedicated to everyone who wants to fight for truth and life on planet Earth. Let’s stand up and defend our rights ! ” Antonio and Rosario Marciano

    • Replies: @Desert Fox
  101. Dannyboy says:

    The perversion of patriotism.

    Do you love your country?

    All the best men are used up and crippled

  102. anon[507] • Disclaimer says:
    @melpol

    One persons “ Pragmatism ”
    is another person’s thuggery , breach of trust, abuse of system , But that’s not the end . That one person denies the “ Pragmatism ” to this – another person.

    Look at BDS!
    It’s bad for Jews
    So can’t be allowed
    But sanctions on Iraq and Iran are ok
    and boycott on German was ok in 1933
    or on Soviet until they allowed Jews to leave for USA or Israel or allow them to rob Soviet as they were expected to . It is good to sanction and boycott Russia for failing to protect the interest of Browder and few other Jewish oligarchs who absconded .

    During the run up to Iraq war certain people got visible and effective . Now it’s said “ they won the argument “
    Yes, they won because other voices were not allowed by “Pragmatism “behaviors of media .
    They are winning the argument by same Pragmatic behaviors on Syria and Iran.
    When Iran does it at home for itself , they call it suppression of free speech
    When people try to question certain behaviors – name calling starts .
    ADL just called a few antisemite for suggesting that killing Suleimani by US served Israeli interests .

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @melpol
  103. renfro says:

    The US Israeli war in the ME has already started…..it just hasn’t been formally announced and probably wont be.
    Just read the ME news.The US is assassinating Hezbollah and Iranian leaders as fast as they can.
    Also a dozen bombing raids on communities of Shia in Syria and Iraq.

    14 hrs ago

    US Iran envoy Brian Hook threatens Ghaani with same fate as Soleimani
    http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2020/01/23/US-Iran-envoy-Brian-Hook-threatens-Ghaani-with-same-fate-as-Soleimani.html
    Esmail Ghaani, the new Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Quds Force commander, will face the same fate as his slain predecessor Qassem Soleimani if he follows in the same path, said US special representative to Iran Brian Hook to Asharq al-Awsat on Wednesday.

    2 hrs ago
    BREAKING – Possible U.S. or #Israel airstrike just killed a senior Kataib #Hezbollah commander in al-Qaim, on #Iraq’s border with #Syria.
    Multiple casualties.

    The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists is today moving its iconic doomsday clock closer to nuclear apocalypse. Now only 100 seconds to midnight.

  104. Half Back says:

    Read this New york times article with comments to see how far one is not allowed to participate group identity.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/22/us/white-supremacy-the-base.html
    Eric has already mentioned how the FBI entrapped them however little is this mentioned in NYT.
    I will not do research on the base maybe they are supremacist ( which i don’t agree with) but more likely on the edges and when individuals are pushed into the corner they feel the need to push back. Note thses groups can sometimes have black people participating and so are not racist par-say. This reminds me of media reaction to the Virginia protest where they fitted up those participating as neo nazi and white supremacist whereby all were a diverse group excising their constitutional rights.

  105. @Agent76

    Thanks for the info, I have for 32 years seen this spraying of the skies in Montana and on a trip to Europe in 2007 and since I am retired I watch a lot of travel videos from all over the world and in the majority of these videos chemtrails are seen and the biggest surprise was seeing them in videos of Russia.

    Over the years I have called tv stations, newspapers, county offices, Montana state offices, and senators and our rep, all to no avail, they won’t touch it, and there is a local talk show here that I have called on occasion and he does not believe it and I emailed him this morning and said look out your window, he is on the top floor of a tall building, and they were spraying again forming X’s and tic tac toe patterns, another chemtrail day, with horizontal clouds, as usual and no one sees a thing, it is truly hidden in plain sight.

    The Montana big sky is a polluted sky and rarely does a day go by when they are not spraying and it used to be in the spring and summer and fall when a person drove a vehicle the front would be covered with insects, not any more, there aren’t any and the bees are also effected, it is a crime against the birds and insects and humanity.

    • Replies: @roonaldo
    , @thotmonger
  106. Trinity says:
    @anon

    And boycotting apartheid South Africa was not only okay but it was PROMOTED. Of course now that (((they))) ended that dreadful and racist ideology of separate restrooms and now that South African Whites are routinely being butchered by gangs of feral homicidal Blacks, we never hear or read about racism in South Africa. Never see rock stars singing about “boycotting Sun City” anymore either. Hmm, seems like separate restrooms for South African Whites and South African Blacks are intolerable but S. African Blacks raping, torturing and killing S. African Whites isn’t important enough to even register with the “anti-racist” crowd. And lets not even compare what happened in apartheid S. Africa to what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians. And lest we forget who is front and center at forcing third world invasions on every White nation on the planet and who is front and center at promoting anti-White hatred around the globe through bullshit documentaries, bullshit propaganda that is passed off as “history” and of course our good friends in Hollywood have made a movie or two that might be considered a bit anti-White.

  107. melpol says:
    @anon

    Self interest not Altruism is the way leading minds work all throughout political history. Hitler,Stalin, Churchill,Roosevelt, Mao, and others acted in their own self interest. There is no rule that is etched in stone that guarantees world peace. The wise Jew tests the wind and goes with the flow. There are 2o million Jews, each of the 20 million Jews has his own choice. Each choice is based on a unique self interest. Jews march to their own beat. They are freedom personified.

    • Replies: @renfro
    , @KA
  108. Trinity says:

    So this is the reason that all of those old 80’s rockers don’t make a video or record about boycotting Israel the way they did back in the day about S. Africa. Wonder what those old-timers are up to nowadays and why they aren’t so vocal about what has been happening to Whites in S. Africa or Palestinians in the Middle East? Where you at, Bono? Doesn’t Bono suppose to be some patron saint of human rights or something? Is Bono racist against Whites and Palestinians? Where is Brucie Springsteen, Cyndi Lauper, Hall & Oates, Pat Benatar and all those other rockers and rappers that were going to boycott Sun City back in the day? The silence speaks volumes. Looks like all of these entertainers and so-called “anti-racists” and “human rights activists” are little more than controlled cuckolds. Pffft, phony POS one and all.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Wally
  109. geokat62 says:

    America has a free speech emergency.

    First and foremost, America has a demographics emergency. As a result, an immigration moratorium has to be implemented, immediately.

    That said, the underlying source of all these symptoms, as Brother Nathanael has explained, is that America has a Jewish emergency!

    • Agree: Trinity
    • Replies: @mark green
  110. Sadly this writer won’t qualify for the re-education camps that are being planned by the evil mass murdering commie Bernie Sanders and his followers.

    Most here won’t qualify either, too dumb. Instead special-education camps will be built. You will be forced to watch spongebob squarepants, look at nudey pictures of Ilhan Omar, and if you’re good, you will receive 1/2 pint of ice cream daily. Probably not much of a change for most here.

    OMG!

    • LOL: Parfois1
    • Replies: @geokat62
  111. Anon[112] • Disclaimer says:

    I am getting tired of low-IQ right-wingers whining about free speech restrictions in the USA.

    These guys are part of the reason for a multitude of mass killings, and the response from the system has been pretty mild. TOO is still up, Erik Striker is still blogging, Unz is still up, Amren is still up, and counter-currents is still up. Gun rights are also still in-tact.

    We are freaking lucky.

    Of course the system will do *something* when WNs go on shooting sprees, we are lucky the response has been so mild.

    Erik Striker is low-IQ. His whole thing is to attack Jws. But come on dummy, of course they are going to oppose nationalism. They were genocided by nationalists just 75 years ago.

    I like how Unz gives multiple perspectives, but we don’t need all the neo-nazi bloggers. Maybe we can just stick with the smart ones, like KMac, who at least has empathy for Jws and doesn’t blame everything on them?

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  112. anon[371] • Disclaimer says:
    @Just passing through

    Mantra to propitiate the god of war or Jewish god for war was scripted and sang day and nights in her chamber . She was instrumental in getting Bush 1 warm to the idea . Without her ,the war would have never happened. Levy,the Israeli foreign minister threatened that it would attack Iraq if UK US didn’t .
    After war became inevitable and inescapable for the Goym,the Zionist took cover under deniability.

  113. renfro says:
    @melpol

    Self interest not Altruism is the way leading minds work all throughout political history

    The mind of a Jew. Unable to imagine or understand men unlike themselves who will and have set aside their own interest for the good of others or the cause of justice.

    And why they always fail in the end…exiled, deported, holocausted, despised, etc..

    Never Learn.

    .

    • Agree: Parfois1
    • Replies: @melpol
  114. KA says:
    @melpol

    It seems that your losing the argument. Allow discussion, and see . You will see America will change for better . The wars will end. Pragmatism will seep into the fabrics of American despite what evangelical or Emergency Committee for Israel or FDD with Fox/ CNN/ WSJ in tow will try to argue.

    When the only voice you hear is your own thought , the deaf can comfortably claim that he had reached the conclusion based on a good reasoned logical conversation .

    • Replies: @melpol
  115. geokat62 says:
    @redmudhooch

    Sadly this writer won’t qualify for the re-education camps that are being planned by the evil mass murdering commie Bernie Sanders and his followers.

    Remind me again what your angle is?

    Oh, yeah. I remember:

    But many of you can’t see the forest (capitalism) for the trees (Jews)…

    The root of our problems is capitalism!

    All we need to do is change our economic system (to socialism/communism?) and all of our problems will go away.

    You’re still stuck fighting the last battle (communism vs capitalism). Welcome to the new battle (globalism vs nationalism).

    … and just to keep you in the loop, the “trees” were/are responsible for instigating both of these battles, as they are now vigorously fighting for globalism as much as they were previously fighting for communism.

  116. Parfois1 says:
    @Greg Bacon

    In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.

    That alleged statement by “Stalin” has done the rounds round here before and the reason why I researched this old trope to reinforce the distorted belief among dimwits about the “Judeo-Bolshevik” partnership. It was printed by a Jewish publication in the US from – hold on! Drumroll – a personal letter written by Stalin! Does anyone capable of a rational thought believe that Stalin would do such a thing? Not long after that the Jewish papers were claiming that Stalin was a horrid anti-Semite!

    The dimwits here believe that anything that appears somewhere in writing is true! Well, that’s why they are…

    The Soviet Criminal Code was the law, not a “Stalin’s letter” that never was. But, even if it were a true letter signed by Stalin himself, that would not make it a law. At one stage the Soviets were trying cozying up with their supporters all over the world because of their interest in influencing international public opinion in their favour and that might be the source of a fictitious ingratiating “Stalin’s letter” written by some minion.

  117. melpol says:
    @KA

    What is best for America is for Trump to decide. He will proceed with the best of Jews at his side. Trump is a businessman who grew up with NYC Jews and he learned to play their game. America will become great again because Trump has hired the best of achievers, they are Ashkenazi Jews. Forget goody goody USA, good guys finish last. Trump is a kickass president and he will gladly kickass to make America great.

    • Replies: @KA
  118. Derer says:

    Not that very long ago:

    Truman to Susskind: “This is Bess’s (his wife) house and that there had never been nor would there ever be a Jewish guest in there.”[15]

    …today he would be impeached.

    During the Trump impeachment circus prominent Democrats/Jews Nadler, Schiff or Schumer constantly refer to founding fathers intentions that suit them…well all founding fathers were strong anti-semites and actually Jews could not vote. Somehow we have betrayed those antisemitic intentions of our founding fathers. Do not use founding fathers intentions selectively.

    Hate is an emotion opposite to love, one cannot suppressed emotions…communists have tried it and failed.

  119. @onebornfree

    You are right. It’s not only the First Amendment ……it’s the entire Bill of Rights. Just look at the Patriot Act which was quietly renewed while the Democrats were too busy demanding Trump’s dismissal for Constitutional Violations!

    The Corporate Fascist Industrial Intelligence Police State which is basically run by Zionists will destroy every freedom we have. It appears to me that the only result that will work is to exercise the Second Amendment to get back the rest of them.

  120. melpol says:
    @renfro

    There are suicide bombers who set aside their lives for the good of others. Millions of Jihadists who shout Allahu Akbar would gladly die for a place in Paradise. But there are no Atheists or Jews who are suicide bombers, it is not in their DNA. I don’t believe Trump or any member of Congress would wear a suicide belt. One day each of us will think like a Jew and none would be willing or glad to die.

    • Replies: @anon
  121. @renfro

    I recently read Belloc’s “The Jews” which examined Jewish antagonism to Gentile interests, essentially predicting the Holocaust decades before WWII.

  122. Parfois1 says:
    @Dannyboy

    Political power grows from the barrel of a gun.

    Sometimes, for a short time only, by uprisings and revolutions. Once the new order “stabilizes” in a “democratic” bourgeois regime, political power grows from money. That’s what happened after the French Revolutions of 1789 and 1848.

    A country (I mean an authentic nation-state) cannot be ruled forever by the barrel of gun, it’s unsustainable. A nation in fear is doomed. It is more profitable and efficient to be ruled by the power of money under the guise of “democracy”. And less messy too.

  123. Parfois1 says:
    @Just passing through

    That’s precious, and the illustration tells a thousand words! Thanks.

  124. @Anon

    Why not go all the way and demand the banning of all the left, liberal and conservative media that is advocating and justifying the murder of Arabs, Iranians, Afghans and whoever else the US dislikes? They are responsible for a lot more deaths than those right wing media you mention.

  125. Derer says:
    @Mulegino1

    Stalin was strong anti-semite, he was the only non-Jew (they were all atheists) in the politburo and gradually eliminated all Jews in the party apparatus. The law meant to be for cover. You have huge gaps in USSR history. After Lenin death USSR Jewish founding fathers Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Rykov (Lenin was half Jew from mother’s side – Blank) and many more were all executed. Just before Stalin died he initiated famous process against the Jewish doctors.

  126. Wally says:
    @Trinity

    Bono has got to be one of the dullest of the bunch.

    Besides unintelligent, he is embarrassingly pretentious, utterly pedestrian, and untalented.

    I mean come on, Bono and U2 have been basically playing the same song over & over their entire career. You hear one of their songs, you’ve heard them all.

  127. Wielgus says:
    @Andrew Joyce

    Ιn 1950, the Liberals had stood large numbers of candidates in an attempt to reverse their ongoing decline, but they did take the precaution of taking out insurance on their deposits, so when they lost a great many of them (and in 1950 the pound was worth more than in 1979) it was not so financially devastating. Anyway the Liberals were more of a mainstream party and had more institutional help.
    A possibly false MSM report in 1980 claimed the NF was reduced to warehousing pornography in its HQ as a result of its financial problems.

  128. @geokat62

    Hi Geo. Always nice to read your comments. You are quite right: America is facing a demographics emergency as well as a Free Speech emergency. These crises are broadly recognized, related to one another, but not widely understood in their finer details.

    You and Br. Nathaniel are correct to link these two dilemmas to the (largely unrecognized) ‘Jewish emergency’ which is fueling America’s ethno-cultural transformation (via illegal immigration), along with the (Jewish-orchestrated) erosion of Free Speech rights for white identerians. Yes, it is a conspiracy.

    Legalistic kosher clampdowns have undermined pro-white political expression on multiple fronts, including lawful Assembly (see: Charlottesville). At the same time, Jewish nationalism has become a sacred American cow. This spells serial US wars and political confrontations (which benefit Israelis). Meanwhile, these glorious, downtrodden, persecuted, ‘pro-democracy’ champions of human rights and ‘racial equality’ (?) view themselves G-d’s chosen people; making them a just wee bit more equal than the rest of humanity. All things considered, it’s an incomprehensible mess. Contradictions abound. But Jewish tribal interests continue to advance.

    Their dubious claims along with the glaring double-standards that amplify Jewish power are exactly where the Jewish narrative begins to break down. But no worries. If their biblical yarns and faux historiography don’t convince you, these wealthy and well-connected mavens of discourse have concocted Plan B. Through the magic of mass media (and punitive speech codes) the globalist Zions are amassing all the evidence needed to demonstrate to the Western world that they are also the planet’s foremost victims. Voila! The magic of indoctrination.

    Consequently, Jewish victimhood, Jewish-Israeli separatism, as well as hard-to-deny Israeli ruthlessness are all being marketed as 1) politically essential and 2) morally righteous, and 3) ‘fully compatible’ with American values.

    The Zionist Big Lie is working. For now.

    If the internet remains unfettered and uncensored, the predatory transnational Zionist project may ultimately implode under the weight of its own falsehoods, avarice, misdeeds and machinations.

  129. Thomasina says:
    @Biff

    In the U.S. you have the inalienable “right” to free speech. It cannot be infringed upon. This is your right, not the government’s right. The government cannot take away what they never had in the first place.

    Privilege has nothing to do with it.

  130. roonaldo says:

    Tried to sneak one in on us, eh Mr. Striker? The part about conservatives being anti-environmentalists for criticising Michael Mann, climate change fraudster extraordinaire, who then takes them to court where they suffer “crushing” defeats, spend millions defending themselves, and all over a not very controversial issue. Sheesh, you left out the term “climate deniers.” At least you correctly put it in terms of being a First Amendment issue. It is, even more correctly, an assault on Reason. Mann is using the same tactics as the Zionists. By the way, Mann tried this tactic against Dr. Tim Ball and lost his shorts, as the B.C., Canada, Supreme Court threw out the case and ordered Mann to pay all of Ball’s legal fees because Mann refused to turn over his raw data so it could be examined by the Court.

    Over fifty years ago, M.I.T. atmospheric scientist Edward Lorenz, using computers in an attempt to improve weather forecasting, discovered the Chaos Principle–that future states of complex physical processes are inherently unpredictable–we cannot know where a system ends up nor why. The theoretical limit to predict weather is about ten days, and the uncertainty of projections increases exponentially with time. Trying to reconstruct worldwide climate states from such things as tree ring data, ice cores, etc. is literally impossible, and the idea that all of these future and past states of climate can be explained or predicted by CO2 levels is certifiably insane, as is any notion that we should obliterate our economy based on such nonsense. No one gets more properly riled up about it than Dr. Duane Thresher, computer modeling expert, atmospheric scientist, and environmental researcher. Dr Judith Curry is a voice of reason on the matter, as was Edward Lorenz. As a primer, I’d suggest an old classic, “Chaos,” by James Gleick.

    • Agree: 9/11 Inside job
    • Disagree: thotmonger
  131. @Parfois1

    I haven’t researched that issue but something else that is often repeated is that the Soviets burned thousands of churches but spared the synagogues. I’d like to see an order that specifically commands that. I thought the Soviets were against all religion and may have nationalised religious property and put it to other uses but did they really favour Judaism over other religions? Perhaps some Russians on UR could give us more reliable information on this an the death sentence for anti-semitism and the possession of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

    On the other hand did they need a specific law to persecute dissidents for whatever reason? Look at the case of USA today. There is no specific law that states you should get 16 years in jail for burning the LGBT flag but then you could well get put away that long for doing just that under some hate law as happened to some guy recently.

    • Replies: @Wielgus
    , @Parfois1
    , @Parfois1
  132. Thomasina says:
    @Andrew Joyce

    Andrew Joyce, I always look for your articles. I’ve still got your last article open as a tab, and I’m going to reread it. I found your references to the Life History Strategy and low conscientiousness very interesting, and I discussed it with my son. You make me think. Please keep venting. Good luck to you and your family.

  133. roonaldo says:
    @Desert Fox

    Indeed, about fifteen years ago I started spending numerous summers on an Idaho Panhandle lake. Days would start clear and beautiful, much as I remembered them from my youth spent in that same area, but by midmorning the cross-hatched pattern of contrails had been laid, and by noon the pattern had merged into a murky skywide haze. I’d seen and read on the internet evidence of this from other areas, so I wasn’t shocked, but was saddened nonetheless. The bastards who conceive of and execute these schemes won’t be brought to justice, as weren’t the criminals who deliberately dosed the region with Hanford radioisotopes, raining death and disease on the public “just to see” the biological effects of it all.

    • Agree: Desert Fox
    • Thanks: Parfois1
  134. A. Farmer says:

    Imagine being so disgusting there have to be laws to try to stop normal people from hating you.

    • Agree: Poco
    • Replies: @Wally
  135. KA says:
    @melpol

    May be . But the Neocons offered same good tidings to the American after 2001 . The repeated the same advice every time the thoughts of cutting losses and leaving Iraq would come up.Bush was following the advice of the best of the AEI. But when advice turned disastrous, the neocons ridiculed Bush and claimed that Bush did not listen to their advice.
    Trump is the new kleenex on the dinner table .

    • Replies: @melpol
  136. anon[371] • Disclaimer says:
    @melpol

    Neocons have been sending others to die for Israel. Zionist introduced the concept of total war . Before WW1 , the war was between soldiers . Immense civilian casualty of war is the effect of total war. But the Jews caused this war . So was WW2.
    Jews don’t die for other . They get other to die for themselves. At least Jihadist kill themselves . Neocons drink the blood of Muslim Christian atheists and Buddhist.to reach the dream of the Zionism.

    • Replies: @melpol
  137. Usually learning history (and general learning) promotes understanding and an expanded worldview.

    Jews and Judaism are topics that the more you learn about them, the less likable they become.

    Seinfeld is hardly compensation for Holodomor, usury, canceling the Bill of Rights and otherwise undermining the West.

  138. melpol says:
    @KA

    Trump means business as he takes on Russia, China,and Iran. He knows that he can destroy the economies of all three. Trump has a loyal team of followers who will help him overcome any resistance. China is starting to implode as American investors like Vultures are ready to pick up the leftovers. Trump is the destroyer of worlds and also the creator of America’s Hegemony.

  139. melpol says:
    @anon

    Hitler promoted Zionism as an option to get rid of Europe’s Jews. His Zionist dreams failed and he decided to deport German Jews to NYC and London. Jews who were too poor to flee were sent to labor and death camps. It is true that powerful NYC Jews bad mouthed and boycotted Hitler but It was Japan that attacked Pearl Harbor and sent America into a war on two fronts. WW2 was a Bonanza for American finance, they were lenders for the reconstruction of Europe. Superpower USA can thank the money lenders that financed industries that built tanks and planes to defeat the enemy.

    • Replies: @barr
  140. Rurik says:
    @Vaterland

    The Bolsheviks won to two major factors: they used the red terror and systematic indoctrination, like Mao, to greater effect, … And as after WW 1 the motivation on the Russian side to fight for the old, defeated regime was low.

    I would add the very disappointing mediocrity of Tsar Nicolas, as a major reason the motivation to fight for the old regime, was low. Nicolas’ feebleness at such a time for Russia, was a catastrophe. Allowing Rasputin, the letch, to have such reign over the Romanov court, made a mockery of the Tsar and his family. Not to mention losing so badly (and stupidly) to little Japan. And treating the Russian peasants with such utter contempt.

    Powerful people, anointed and exalted, often confuse their purpose in life. The Tsar and his reign existed for Russia, and the Russian people. Not the other way around. Monarchies, all too often, seem to make that same damnable mistake.

    The admiration for Stalin and the nostalgia for the Soviet Union is, of course, worrisome. But understandable.

    At the advent and center of the Soviet madness that descended upon Russia- as like a demonic plague, were the Jewish supremacists, who hated the Tsar’s guts with a netherworld insanity. (the Tsar did do some things right ; ). The tragic thing, is that ((they)) also hated the Russian people, with the same madness we’re witness to all over the planet today, as the J-supremacists are consolidating Total power over the West, and using that power to genocide the West off the planet.

    One possible reason for a conflicted view of Stalin in Russia today, is that eventually he did repudiate the Jewish supremacists of Russia, (which some speculate might have sealed his doom, – his doctors being Jewish, I’ve read).

    In any case, what has happened, is that the Jewish supremacists that were dominating Russia in absolute terms, are now over here, and dominating the West in absolute terms.

    When they were in Russia, it was genocide and gulags and horrors unleashed. Think Bela Kun in Hungary, or Kaganovich in Ukraine. Et al, et cetera.. all across the blood and tear-soaked Steppe, and beyond.

    But now they’re over here, and so now we get to frolic in hatred and strife, on the brink of civil wars. France and England and Sweden get to wallow in the bile of J-supremacy- and raw hate, cultural sewage, and ethnic strife – on acid. So I wonder.. as the Russian people witness the arrogant West, writhing in its death throes, I wonder if they’re simply grateful for Stalin having, at long last, purged the demon seed from their midst, and sent it to London and Paris and NYC, to give those people a taste of what it’s like.

    ?

    • Agree: Dannyboy
    • Replies: @Parfois1
  141. barr says:
    @melpol

    Didn’t America declare war on Japan by putting blockade and sanction before Pearl Harbor took place? To the future apologist,drone over the foreign sky is not a war .Flying drones to kill the gatherings at a wedding is not war.

    Russia and China wee pretty low on the totem pole of power and influence but US did not move much on the scale . US can bomb Chinese embassy in Serbia China had to stay quiet. But that was then .Not centuries ago. Just 20 years ago . What happened to US freedom, prosperity and upward mobility ( look at airport and the look inside the plane, death by 1000 cuts -suicide , drugs violence, racial tension, 42 % having less than 1000 dollars in bank to meet emergency, kids don’t leave houses at age 30 ,wages don’t cover much other than food and the transport to get to work,only jobs that pay with benefit is in military )

    Now China and Russia have reversed the order on the totem pole Its little harder for the mature clown in orange head garb to do much . He can break the pole . But not much He can’t put US on the top .He cab smash it ending the hope of US ever coming back roaring like Russia did .

    • Replies: @melpol
  142. melpol says:
    @barr

    Present day America has over 500 major corporations ready to service 1.2 Billion Chinese customers. But Xi only lets in a few companies who promise to share their ownership with the Chinese government. Trump has spearheaded a drive to break the Communist Party and replace it with American corporate CEOs. A Chinese-American figurehead can be used to stop any resistance to American influence. King Trump was NYC’s builder of Trump Towers and thousands of apartment rentals for poor Brooklyn Jews. He will move his throne to Jerusalem and declare he is the born again King Solomon. Orthodox Jews and Evangelical Christians will celebrate the coming of the Messiah.

  143. Trinity says:
    @Parfois1

    “The dimwits here believe that anything that appears somewhere in writing is true!”

    I bet you are the type of moron who still believes the “Nazis” made lampshades and bars of soap out of Jews during the so-called, “holocaust.” It wasn’t that long ago when the far fetched and RIDICULOUS LIE of making bars of soap out of Jews was published in best sellers like, “The Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich” by William Shirer. And despite the so-called official number of deaths at Auschwitz being dropped by nearly 3 million we still keep seeing ((( people))) write that 6 million Jews perished in the so-called, “holocaust” instead of 3 million give or take. You would think (((these people))) would be happy to report that a far less number of Jews died at the hands of those “evil Nazis” but no they still cling to the falsehood of this “6 million” number even though that is yet another “holocaust” myth that has OFFICIALLY been debunked.
    A few excerpts from Dr. David Duke’s excellent book: ” My Awakening”

    The Jewish Voice in January, 1942, which stated, “The Jewish people will never forget that the Soviet Union was the first country — and as yet the only country in the world — in which anti-Semitism is a crime.

    The book Soviet Russia and the Jews by Gregor Aronson and published by the American Jewish League Against Communism (1949 NY) quotes Staling remarking on the policy in an interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency:
    …Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the Soviet Union. Active Anti-Semites are punished by death under the law.

    So these writings are bullshit according to (((people))) like you but making lampshades and bars of soap out of Jews and German soldiers spearing babies with bayonets is factual history? ROTFLMAO at YOU.

  144. barr says:

    He will move his throne to Jerusalem and declare he is the born again King Solomon. Orthodox Jews and Evangelical Christians will celebrate the coming of the Messiah.”

    That already has happened . Only those left behind cant see it

  145. Trinity says:
    @Parfois1

    Oh and btw, I tend to believe the numbers given out by the Red Cross of only a couple hundred thousand Jews perishing in the concentration camps. And the gas chamber theory has been debunked and most believe that the Jews held in these camps died of typhus, or starvation from the result of food not being able to be received in these camps due to Allied bombing, etc.

    Of course we know that there was a holocaust during WWII and it was the Germans who were burned alive by allied bombings not to mention the millions of Germans raped, tortured, and murdered during the war and during “peace time” after the war. Of course we are never taught in “our” schools and colleges about the Eisenhower Death Camps or the Allied bombings that melted German civilians into the asphalt, some of the victims were no more than children or elderly men and women. Never taught that an estimated 2 million German women were tortured and raped by the “good guys” who were described by shill, Tom Brokaw, as “the greatest generation ever.” And to think that WWII has been described as the so-called, “good war.” Anyone who would write that WWII was a “good war,” a war where at least 50 million plus people died has to be one of the sickest and most vile psychopaths around.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
  146. A123 says:
    @barr

    Give me an example where people have been silenced from being labeled as islamophobe?

    Job? Nothing so trivial.

    Accurately reporting on Muslim pedophiles gets you labelled an islamophobe and then the Islamo-Globalist star chamber throws you in prison. (1)

    Clashing with police, protesters were heard chanting “paedo protectors” and “you’re not English anymore” at officers. And another was seen burning an EU flag as tempers flared and terrified tourists were herded into Westminster Abbey.


    Do not let NONstarter, a known troll, deceive you. It is proven fact that Muhammad raped Aisha when she was nine.

    PEACE 😇
    _______

    (1) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9483610/tommy-robinson-sentenced-contempt-trial-video-parliament/

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
    , @anon
  147. Unz is the only site with a large following that has true free speech.

    Scary right?

    Every other place is either controlled (Reddit through the bought mod accounts) or censored (every msm outlet, of course they are also controlled).

    If the west truly want to be free, first step is to take back media control from the Jews. Second step is the control of higher education.

    The one thing Chinese does right. Total control of their media, not even suckerberg marrying a Chinese and naming his kid in Chinese change that.

  148. Mulegino1 says:
    @Adûnâi

    What you write is true, but you will notice the phraseology of the document:

    Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.

    Keep in mind this was written well before the great purge, and Stalin’s concept of “socialism in one state” had not yet been ensconced as official Soviet policy.

    Stalin was either always a shrewd anti-Judaic who kept his cards close to the vest or became one later on due to subsequent conflict with the “rootless cosmopolitans.” But at the time this was written, Stalin was surrounded- and perhaps circumscribed by Jews.

  149. @A123

    You failed to mention that Yaxley-Lennon’s reportage violated the restrictions of a court order and, as such, he was found in contempt:

    Last week, a two-day hearing at the Old Bailey had found the 36-year-old jeopardised the grooming trial by live-streaming men accused of the sexual exploitation of young girls on Facebook, in breach of a reporting ban, outside Leeds Crown Court in May 2018.

    You also failed to mention he plead guilty to the charge.

    A’s honesty: rest in pieces.

    • LOL: A123
    • Replies: @A123
  150. A123 says:
    @AnonStarter

    NONstarter,

    Your double standards and hypocrisy are painfully obvious.

    You are for silencing the press to cover up barbaric Muslim child rapes. Yet are histrionic to the point of nervous breakdown when you a prevented from lying about Jews.

    NONstarter’s Medical Condition: Deeply psychotic.
    Recommendation: Immediate high dose medication.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
  151. Wielgus says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Anti-religious propaganda in the USSR, including in the 1920s and 1930s, was as hostile to rabbis as to priests, ministers and mullahs.

  152. Poco says:
    @melpol

    The argument jews always use is that they are better than everyone else and everyone else is just jealous of them. Because they are better than everyone else they shouldn’t even have to hear or read any criticism. This is a bad stance to take and won’t end well for them in the long run.

    • Agree: Dannyboy
  153. @A123

    /You are for silencing the press to cover up barbaric Muslim child rapes./

    Not in the least.

    If a nominal Muslim has actually raped a child, I not only want full, legal coverage of the event, I want him prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Were it possible, I’d like to see application of shari’ah law, which would warrant capital punishment.

    /Yet are histrionic to the point of nervous breakdown when you a prevented from lying about Jews./

    LOL!

    You never answered my earlier questions, A.

    Why is that? Are you afraid to admit you consider Florida’s new legislation criminalizing “hate speech” to be a “mitzvah”?

    • LOL: A123
    • Replies: @A123
  154. A123 says:
    @AnonStarter

    If a nominal Muslim has actually raped a child, I not only want full, legal coverage of the event, I want him prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Were it possible, I’d like to see application of shari’ah law, which would warrant capital punishment.

    Muhammad raped Aisha when she was nine.

    Your mental deficit prevents you from seeing the inconsistency between your words and your paedo-faith.

    You never answered my earlier questions, A. … Why is that? Are you afraid to admit you consider Florida’s new legislation criminalizing “hate speech” to be a “mitzvah”?

    Nonny-baby, that is because your mental illness is causing you to gibber questions that make no logical sense. Asking a Christian about a “mitzvah” is clear evidence of your irrationality.

    Please seek immediate psychiatric assistance before you become even more unhinged and begin to self harm.

    PEACE 😇

  155. @Moi

    And he also applied a great deal of pressure to get Wilson to declare war on Germany.

  156. @A123

    Aisha (ra): The Case for an Older Age in Sunni Hadith Scholarship

    Abstract

    A famous ḥadīth states that ʿĀisha was 9 years old when her marriage with the Prophet ﷺ was consummated. However, in the science of ḥadīth verification (muṣṭalaḥ al-ḥadīth), there are several conditions for the veracity of a ḥadīth, the last two of which are the absence of ʿilal (hidden defects) and shudhudh (discrepancy). Criticism of the ʿĀisha-age ḥadīth has been mounted on this basis by the traditionalist Syrian scholar of ḥadīth, Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn al-Idlibī. He determines the content of the ʿĀisha-age ḥadīth to be discrepant (shādhdh) and defective (maʿlūl) on the basis of numerous evidences which collectively suggest that ʿĀisha was born four years prior to the start of the Prophetic mission, betrothed to the Prophet ﷺ in the tenth year of prophethood at age fourteen, and married to him one year after the migration at the age of almost 18. Discrepancy is established by many arguments including that it contradicts other aḥadīth even in Ṣaḥīḥ Bukhārī, for instance, where ʿĀisha explains that by the time she attained the age of awareness, her parents were already following Islam—which logically necessitates that she was born prior to their conversion. In addition to demonstrating discrepancy with ḥadīth sources, he draws upon many biographical sources including Ibn Saʿd, Ibn Isḥāq, Al-Ṭabarī, Ibn ʿAsākir, Abū Nuʿaym, Ibn al-Athīr, Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr, and others. The collective weight of these evidences is what he mobilizes to assert that the ʿĀisha-age ḥadīth can be attributed to a mistaken statement in the transmitted report (at-tawahhum qawl al-murawī).

    /Asking a Christian about a “mitzvah” is clear evidence of your irrationality./

    Oh, come now … “mitzvah” simply means “good deed.”

    So, as a self-professed Christian, do you think the new law is good? After all, it does prosecute “hate speech” against your favorite people.

    • LOL: A123
  157. Anonymous[212] • Disclaimer says:

    All I can tell tell you is that Armenian Americans had the tpo Jewish lobbying groups (such as the ADL) on the run in 2007, but few of you helped to expand that campaign.

  158. @Desert Fox

    I do not know what is coming out of any one plane, let alone what thousands may be emitting. For all I know right now a plane might be spraying a ton of weaponized anthrax over the west coast of USA.

    [MORE]

    But I do know for two decades now the chemtrails cult has only created a soggy hairball for actual evidence that persistent jet clouds are intentional “spraying”. There are better explanations. Ulrich Schumann has published his studies on jet clouds since the 1990s. Christopher Exley, the premier expert on aluminum ecotoxicology, is — as of a few months ago — not aware of any evidence to support free aluminum coming from jets emissions. And so on.

    Yes, the commercial airline industry is dirty. Their pollution does cause disease and death. The clouds they make are an eye sore and can affect regional weather too. But I am unaware of any scientific society or public health agency anywhere in the world that is stating with confidence they have evidence of some chemical signature of an intentional, international program of spraying chemical and/or biological agents.

    And if you want to see about the most absurd page of “lab tests” go to geoengineering watch. A group of malnourished grade school kids could not have done a worse job on a Friday afternoon.
    https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/lab-tests-2/

    Sorry to be so blunt. Now, please, back to the First Amendment and BDS Israel.

  159. Art says:

    Here is the coming future for the Jews in America.

    Brother Putin – new rules in Russia – NO duel citizens in government – PERIOD!

    Putin Has Deprived the Children of the Elite of Their Political Future
    2020 Stalker
    …. …. ….

    “What does that mean?” he asked. And he answered that question himself. Rather, he proposed innovations to the basic law of the country: heads of subjects, members of the State Duma, deputies of the State Duma, the head of the government and their offices, federal ministers, heads of federal bodies, and judges cannot have foreign citizenship, a residence permit, or other document that allows permanent residence on the territory of another state.

    Putin proposed to impose even more severe restrictions on the future president: to establish the requirement of permanent residence in Russia for at least 25 years and the absence of foreign citizenship or residence permit in another state.

    https://www.stalkerzone.org/putin-has-deprived-the-children-of-the-elite-of-their-political-future/

    Jew oligarchs and globalization types – beware!

    Think Peace — Do No Harm

    • Agree: anarchyst
  160. geokat62 says:
    @mark green

    Hi Geo. Always nice to read your comments.

    Likewise, mark. As far as I’m concerned, you’re the top commenter here at Unz… by a wide margin.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  161. @Andrew Joyce

    SAMPLE BUMPER STICKER:

    – End Judeo Lese Majeste

    SAMPLE LETTER TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVE:

    Senator (or Congressman)
    US Senate
    221 Dirksen Senate Office Bldg.
    Washington, D.C., 20510

    re: First Amendment v. Israel apartheid

    Dear Senator – ,

    Not long ago I overheard some young adults discuss how Israel has a “Shoot to Cripple” policy where their snipers use live dum dum bullets and, in the last two years, have maimed and crippled several thousand Palestinian protesters. This was disturbing enough. But now I have been hearing about state bills and even a presidential executive order that outlaw or restrict any criticism of Israel. In USA.

    Having finally given this some thought, I have come to realize that Israel does appear to be an apartheid state. As long as it remains such, USA should not reward this conduct with any financial aid. Meanwhile, the BDS Israel movement is a wonderful idea. Its humanitarian motives are clear and unassailable.

    Furthermore, I do not understand why our First Amendment right to free speech and freedom of conscience is being trampled at the state and federal level on behalf of another country. It is as if some “Judeo lese majeste” is being legislated throughout USA as a way to squelch discussion and the moral outrage that might naturally occur as more Americans learn about these serious crimes and atrocities.

    Please give me your position on these important issues.
    Sincerely,



    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Cycling Goddess
  162. Parfois1 says:
    @Commentator Mike

    On the other hand did they need a specific law to persecute dissidents for whatever reason? Look at the case of USA today. There is no specific law that states you should get 16 years in jail for burning the LGBT flag but then you could well get put away that long for doing just that under some hate law as happened to some guy recently.

    Off my head, from general understanding about Soviet history, not from specific incidents, upon the October Revolution the Soviets carried on their promise of “Peace, Bread, Land”. Regarding land, they nationalized all the land in the Union, the legal meaning of “land” includes everything on it, under it and above (Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos). Therefore, everything on land was public property, including churches, monasteries, etc. Nothing unusual about that: even in the capitalist countries, where private property law is sacrosanct, the owner of the land is the State or Crown. In addition to the land, the Soviet authorities ordered the confiscation of all other private property (valuables), including the Church’s, in 1922 when the country was facing famine (“war communism” when the state took charge of everything to provide for everybody).

    It is well known that the Orthodox Church had extensive land holdings as well as being an outspoken enemy of Communism for being atheistic. Therefore, what followed was a clash and much violence, particularly during the civil war following 1917 when the Church supported the Whites against the Reds. Mind you, the people who won the civil war were the common people, mostly the peasantry, who were deeply religious. After the civil war the order of the the day was to rebuild the country after seven years of wars and destruction and the social order was re-established as well as an accommodation of sorts with the Church. There was no law against any religion and, in fact, it was illegal to incite religious hatred (that’s the law the feral anti-communist cum-anti-Semites here at UR claim, wrongfully of course, as being the “Bolshevik’s law for the protection of Jews” crap).

    Apologies if I can’t provide a more comprehensive account of those events. There is much anti-Soviet propaganda out there about that topic and very little of a sober, contextual and impartial treatment of it.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
    , @thotmonger
  163. Parfois1 says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Apologies again – failed to address the other issue, anti-dissident laws in the Soviet Union. There was a law (I mentioned it before on another thread) under the heading of “Laws against the State”. As a general principle of Law, people could say anything they liked, but if the purpose, intention, was to cause or promote social disorder or bring about the end of the Soviet state, that is, counter-revolutionary activities, that would be against the law, punished by six-month imprisonment at least. More severe cases (at war or national emergency) it could lead to a death sentence.

    One of the most notorious (and murderous) anti-Soviet activists was the Socialist Revolutionary Boris Savinkov, leader of the plot to kill Lenin and others. (Lenin survived the shooting but died from it later) . After tete-a-tetes with the luminaries of the period – including Churchill, Foch and Hoffmann – he returned to Russia to carry out the “final operation to destroy” Bolshevism (Operation Trust as the spearhead for a general uprising ahead of an Anglo-German-French intervention) but the Cheka was waiting and he became the star of a famous show trial where he confessed all his 007-style exploits as a prime candidate to face the execution squad. He got 10 years!

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
  164. Wally says:
    @A. Farmer

    Nice zinger.

    Then, imagine being so easily debunked that there have to be laws against free speech concerning the fake & impossible “holocaust” that Jews demand subservience to.

  165. Parfois1 says:
    @Rurik

    I wonder if they’re simply grateful for Stalin having, at long last, purged the demon seed from their midst, and sent it to London and Paris and NYC, to give those people a taste of what it’s like.

    Uncle Joe was an astute bastard allright, but not that cunning to scheme such calamity on an ally…!!!
    I think you have to give that credit to Adolph and Rosenberg who started the scare.

    Personally, Stalin disliked the Jews. After all, he almost reached priesthood in the Orthodox Church and his outlook was typically Christian. He made sarcastic comments about the Bolshevik Jews having their own faction (the “club”) and, gradually, one-by-one, he removed them from the Bolshevik perch. Eventually he went for the jugular and imposed the quota system in all state institutions, thereby undermining their dominance in the arts, science and learned professions.

    A little aside regarding the Russian-Japanese war 1905 and Nicholas’s incompetence. Once I read a historical novel (English author, forgot the name) where it was mentioned an incident in the South Atlantic when a powerful Russian fleet attempted to enter the Bay of Luanda to obtain fresh supplies. At the entry to the harbour facing that huge fleet was a lone Portuguese sloop whose commander communicated to the Russian admiral that he had no orders to allow entry and would resist. They could have ignored the warning and push the minute sloop off the way without firing a shot but instead they saluted the capitan and resumed the voyage … to Vladivostok!!!

    When the decrepit remnants of the fleet got to the strait between Korea and Japan the Japanese fleet was waiting for them and sank it.

    The English and French denied access to the Suez Canal and the Russians had to follow Vasco da Gama’s route to the East.

  166. @Andrew Joyce

    Thank you Andrew Joyce. Eagerly awaiting another brilliant scholarly article from you detailing the particulars of these (((crypto censors))).

  167. @thotmonger

    Israel’s Shoot to Cripple policy, coupled with Israeli citizens sitting on hilltops cheering the IDF on, is adding to a tsunami of negative karma this people is creating for itself.

  168. @Parfois1

    Your defence of the Bolsheviks confiscating the whole country is “nothing unusual about that.” LOL
    Then you say that the people who ‘won’ were religious peasants, yet I would doubt that the leadership in any way reflected their religiosity, or that peasants who warm to Bolshevism are truly ‘religious.’
    Finally you deny that the law against religious hate was intended to protect Jews more than anyone else. Yet many Christian churches were destroyed and many pastors arrested or killed “without hate” while ‘anti-Semitism’ was made a capital offense. You need to write at greater length to convince anyone of such claims.

  169. @A123

    Do you think it impossible that Moses or Solomon or other OT heroes had ‘underage’ girlfriends/ wives/ concubines?

    What then?

    And we know about Plato — not a religious figure but a venerated one.

  170. @Parfois1

    Quote:

    The American Hebrew editor wrote (The American Hebrew, 11/18/32 p. 12): “According to such information as the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue has been torn down, as have hundreds — perhaps thousands of Greek Catholic Churches”

    End quote, from E. Dilling in The Octopus (1940) page 73.

    I keep stumbling across passages like this, all illustrate something wildly disproportionate.

  171. @Trinity

    What’s your evidence that American GI’s raped German women? My impression is that this was a Soviet specialty, as was kidnapping ethnic Germans and sending them to the Gulag.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  172. Trinity says:
    @jack daniels

    Ever seen the documentary or read the book, “Hellstorm: The Death Of Nazi Germany?” IF you think for one minute that American, French, British and colonial troops didn’t participate in those rapes as well than you are perhaps the most naive person on the planet. The bulk of the rapes might have been committed by the Soviets ( Mongolians especially) but the “good guys” did enough despicable and disgustingly inhumane things on their own. And do you think the Eisenhower Death Camps were much better than the Soviet gulags? Look at how confessions were beaten out of Germans at the so-called “Nuremberg Trials.” You squeeze some guy’s testicles with a pair of pliers and he will tell you anything you want. What sort of “trial’ is that?

    People do things in war because they can literally get away with murder and rape and not face any consequences. Do you think that every American or British GI was a boy scout and an honorable human being? What makes you think some sick bastards weren’t drafted to go over there and fight the Germans. Are rapists and serial killers only found in the former Soviet Union?

  173. The easiest solution to the free-speech problem is to reduce the role of money in politics via legislation. The most arcane PC nonsense succeeds in becoming obligatory belief because people can be effectively punished for disagreeing, and the reason for THAT is ultimately about money and where the money comes from. Negate money and you negate the moneyed.
    Voila!

  174. anarchyst says:

    …Monika Schaefer
    …Ursula Haverbeck
    …Sylvia Stolz
    …Ernst Zundel

    …and many others have suffered persecution and imprisonment for merely questioning “that which shall not be questioned”–the jewish holohoax (oops I mean “holocaust™”).

    In the case of Ernst Zundel, his Canadian home was firebombed by jewish interests. This crime was never investigated as Zundel was “persona non grata” in Canada due to his quest for holocaust ™ TRUTH…

    Sylvia Stolz is an attorney who attempted to provide a proper defense for her client, but was jailed for attempting to do so.

    The “kangaroo courts” that try these “holocaust™” cases use a dishonest “legal fiction” called “judicial notice” This dishonest legal “trick” disallows the introduction of any evidence that goes against “commonly accepted beliefs about the “holocaust™even if the holocaust™ claims by holocaust™ supporters can be proven to be false. This legal fiction disallows a proper defense for anyone who is “caught up” in these “show trials“.

    The so-called jewish holocaust™ has been turned into a “religion” from which no questioning or investigation into its validity is permitted. In many countries, jewish holocaust™ investigation is punishable by prosecution and incarceration.
    One would think that the jews would be relieved to know that “6 million™” did not perish…

    Holocaustianity™” must be exposed for the massive fraud that it is.

    • Agree: Dannyboy
    • Replies: @Parfois1
  175. “the brain trusts and money-power leading the war on our civil liberties is the same as the one which oppressed people in the Soviet Union and oppresses Palestinians today.

    The universalist Jewish humanist is a work of fiction. America has a free speech emergency.”

    Some of the best sentences I have read in a long time. Jews, considered collectively, are a very dangerous people. And now organized Jewry knows that because of the internet it has lost the near total control it has had over the narrative since 1945. Consequently Bolshevism is coming back among the Jews and their white collaborators. As a certain German leader well knew. there is no reason why Bolshevism and Capitalism cannot coexist if Jews and their influence predominate in both.

  176. Parfois1 says:
    @anarchyst

    The “kangaroo courts” that try these “holocaust™” cases use a dishonest “legal fiction” called “judicial notice” This dishonest legal “trick” disallows the introduction of any evidence that goes against “commonly accepted beliefs about the “holocaust™”

    Courts apply the law, not justice; it is naive to presume otherwise. Whatever it is defined as law (statutes, precedents, rules of evidence, legal interpretation) are the tools judges use to resolve judicial questions. They merely carry out the will of the state and are part of the state’s machinery as the enforcement branch.

    I was involved at an appellate level (Supreme Court) case where oral evidence was produced contrary to logic and the full court accepted it on the grounds that it was not bound to follow the rules of logic. Judicial notice and official statements are treated as incontrovertible facts.

  177. Why is it commenters can’t write “some Jews” or “Zionists” or whatever, but not the word Jews without qualification? Or are so many of the commenters trolls from Tel Aviv?

    I refuse to believe all Jews are part of a plot. Many are decent but afraid of Jewish extremists.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  178. Trinity says:
    @Gordon Pratt

    And how many JEWS are fighting against Jewish and/or Zionist Supremacist and their plan to DESTROY WESTERN CIVILIZATION AND GENOCIDE WHITES BY FORCED ASSIMILATION? Go ahead, I bet you can’t name 10 names. I even wonder if people like Brother Nathaniel aren’t just put on display to mock the stupid goyim. Oh, and btw, you don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, just look at all those Christian Zionists like John Hagee.

    Just as you don’t see many if any Middle Eastern Muslims condemning Islamic terrorist attacks, you see even fewer Jews speak out against Jewish Supremacists, Jewish power and influence in the West, Jewish war crimes and crimes against humanity. Go ahead and list any Jewish organization or the number of influential Jews that oppose open borders for America and Europe, speak out against racism against Whites, speak out against the brutal treatment of Palestinians, etc. You might can give me a grand total of 5 legit Jews who actually oppose what is happening to Whites globally, the treatment of Palestinians in the Middle East or who are willing to tell the truth about the stranglehold Jewish power and money has on America. Go ahead and make a list. I think we should drop the term “Zionist” altogether, because just refer to many of these people bent on destroying White culture as Jewish Supremacists. And please don’t list any neo-Commies like Mark Levin or David Horowitz, what a joke those two Israel Firsters are.

    • Replies: @anon
  179. anon[307] • Disclaimer says:
    @Trinity

    “if any Middle Eastern Muslims condemning Islamic terrorist attacks,”
    Because they have been killed already .Even a mild one like Khassoghi . Where can they expect any protection? Journalists are languishing in Egyptian and gulf jails
    Columnists in India are getting killed or getting raided or hounded out of the country. Pakistan has killed quite a few journalist under regimes that were big friends of US military.

    Condemning Islamic extremism often nurtured by USA-UK is not a fun thing to be taken lightly .

    • Replies: @Trinity
  180. Trinity says:
    @anon

    Condemning Muslims raping and grooming young European girls along with raping other women, even young boys in some cases, is something that ALL DECENT HUMAN BEINGS SHOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM STANDING AGAINST whatever their race, creed, color or religion.

    Oh and btw, MOST Americans with the exception of Jewish Supremacist Jewish Americans and their Christian Zionist lackeys, the neo-Commies, along with our bought and paid off demshevik and repuke politicians don’t want America or any other TRADITIONALLY WHITE NATION meddling in the Middle East. And unlike Jews and Muslims not speaking out against the wrong doing of their kinsmen, MANY AMERICANS AND BRITS have no problem condemning our meddling in the Middle East, but alas, our bought and paid for leaders in Washington have no problem going against the people they are supposed to be working for, and they only answer to the highest bidder. Trump has shown us once and for all that America doesn’t have elections, we have selections.

    Name one single Jewish organization that supports closing our borders or the borders of any White nation to the third world? Barbara Spectre, George Schwartz aka George Soros, etc., etc., the list goes on and on, and yet these people support kicking Africans out of Israel and Israel remaining largely a Jewish nation with a token non-Jew here and there. Both Islamic and Jewish extremists are reaping damage on our nations in there own way so why in the world should America or Britain even give two shits about the Middle East. Let them fight each other the way they have been doing for centuries, and bring OUR young men and women home.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Commentator Mike
  181. The apparent inconsistencies Eric refers to are not really inconsistencies because the perennial question ‘what’s best for the Jews?’ remains constant. It’s just circumstances have changed.

  182. anon[307] • Disclaimer says:
    @Trinity

    Have you kept a tally of those girls and boys missing in USA, raped and killed in USA, trafficked in USA ?

    This is not your UK. We are talking about USA. Do I care about UK? No ,not at all. Neither for Romanian orBulgarian trafficked to Israel or ME.

    The problem of white nationalism is that never it took a stand against oppression exploitation corruption carried by the leaders of the white until the effects started appearing on the gutter where they have been kept submerged by their own folks for decades. It has no legitimacy . It has lost now the few limited perks offered by this behemoth . Now the baby is crying .
    Wake up and smell the coffee.

    • Troll: Trinity
  183. @onebornfree

    Same thing. If you lose FoS, you lose all the other rights. There’s a reason the First is the first.

  184. @anarchyst

    You hire a bunch of SJWs to promote Affirmative Action: every race must be equally represented in faculty. When you have brewed up a solid head of social justice warmongering, you drop the nuke: Jews are a race too.

  185. Rurik says:
    @geokat62

    you’re [Mark Green] the top commenter here at Unz

    I second that, Geo.

    Mark’s comments are cogent, well-reasoned, thoughtful, on topic, insightful and eloquent.

    It’s a pleasure to read them, as it is yours as well.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  186. @mark green

    If the internet remains unfettered and uncensored, the predatory transnational Zionist project may ultimately implode under the weight of its own falsehoods, avarice, misdeeds and machinations.

    It isn’t and it won’t. But masses brought down governments even before the advent of the Internet.

    Legalistic kosher clampdowns have undermined pro-white political expression on multiple fronts, including lawful Assembly

    That also never prevented people from getting together in the streets to start riots, rebellions, uprisings, and revolutions.

  187. anon[807] • Disclaimer says:
    @A123

    Calling the man as rapist or pedophile is not appropriate. He married the girl ( age could be anywhere from at least 15 to 25 according to different calculation. ) and he stayed married ,didn’t traffic the girl,didn’t kill her and elevated her to the esteem of his followers . Marriage was approved and was agreed by the girl. Not only that she took part in battle and she advised the leadership about Islam. Even after death of the man,she did not question the marriage .

    It seems that person including like you would agree to the version or the account that his or her father was actually raping his or her mother throughout the marriage if for some reason society decided that marriage age should be raised to 40yrs.

  188. geokat62 says:
    @Rurik

    Mark’s comments are cogent, well-reasoned, thoughtful, on topic, insightful and eloquent.

    Well said, Rurik. Could you imagine what America would be like if most men had the intelligence, integrity, and wisdom of a mark green? Hart-Celler wouldn’t stand a chance of passing in a million years!

    It’s a pleasure to read them, as it is yours as well.

    Likewise, Rurik.

  189. anon[807] • Disclaimer says:
    @A123

    Not as bad as not getting justice . Recent arm twisting of Cyprus by Israel over the gang rape of a British woman by some 5-6 vulgar Israeli teens showed the real teachings of Talmud in more than a few ways- Jewish can do whatever they want with Goym and then claim innocence .

  190. KA says:

    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200128-saudi-accused-of-judaising-the-quran/

    Israel is not only attacking current speech but is targeting past speech as well.

  191. Jewish Communists played a large part in the US civil rights movement. There’s no reason why they shouldn’t get the credit they deserve for that.

    Anybody opposing free speech is doing something shameful. You only have to look at Israel/Palestine to see how people who believe in the master race, subject race ideology treat their subjects. People who want censorship don’t want to hide how wonderful they are.

    It wasn’t only the Nazis who have had that belief. There were many British, including Winston Churchill, who believed that the British were the right master race. Now, many Yanks of all races think the same about themselves. Do I even need to mention the French, Dutch or Belgians?

    Of course, I’m using race here in an identification sense as Hitler did. I don’t know if he realised that but I’ve met blond, blue eyed, wide shouldered, narrow hipped Prussians and brown haired, brown eyed, narrow shouldered, wide hipped Bavarians and wondered about stereotypes and how well Hitler would have fitted in. I see no reason to think he didn’t identify as German. [email protected]

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  192. Cornelius says:

    Are people here also on the BANG! forum?

  193. anarchyst says:
    @Donald A Thomson

    /Jewish Communists played a large part in the US civil rights movement. There’s no reason why they shouldn’t get the credit they deserve for that./

    I not only agree with the above statement, but have personally witnessed the machinations by these communist jews and their black “pets”…IT’S ALWAYS THE JEWS…

    I came of age during the first so-called “civil-rights” movement and saw for myself the underhanded dealings, the demonization of decent, law-abiding whites, and in general, the deterioration of civil society.

    Almost all of the “civil-rights” workers and demonstration “handlers” were of one persuasion–New York based leftist communist jews. They cared not one wit about true “civil rights”, but were there to create hate and discontent among their black charges (who were too stupid or naive to see that they were being used to suborn and destroy legitimate government and society–a favorite communist tactic).

    These New York-based “carpetbaggers” fomented their hate and discontent, only to become future “civil-rights” attorneys, race-hustlers, and America-hating leftist communists…and the ADL and $PLC being invented.
    Those of us whites who were in the middle of this “civil-rights” revolution had a saying: “Behind every negro, there is a jew”. No truer words were spoken.
    Let’s not forget their infestation of the nation’s education and entertainment systems, (which continues to the present day), in which they can spread their jewish supremacist poison.

    The so-called “non-violent civil-rights demonstrations” were anything but “non-violent”. Robberies, rapes, and other criminal acts were common, but never reported, as even the “mainstream media” was “in on the game” and conveniently turned off their cameras during the acts of violence. You see, even then,”creating crises” was a part of the agenda.

    The “beginning of the end” of America was the use of federal troops against white Americans, which, in itself was a violation of “posse comitatus”–the prohibition on the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement purposes. As most whites were (and still are) law-abiding, they (we) were “steamrollered” by the use of federal troops to crush honest dissent. We never recovered from those unconstitutional actions. It was all downhill from there…

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Striker Comments via RSS