The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewEric Margolis Archive
Mideast Peace Talk Kabuki
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
OpenAI Text Summary
The article reflects on the historical and ongoing conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, emphasizing how it has significant implications for both regional stability and American interests. The author, Eric Margolis, recalls his pre-9/11 warnings about the detrimental effects of the Palestinian plight on U.S. security, and he supports President Obama’s efforts to alleviate Palestinian suffering. Margolis argues that the protracted suffering of Palestinians undermines American values and tarnishes the country's global reputation. He believes that resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is crucial for reducing terrorism and fostering peace in the Muslim world.

Margolis critiques the recent peace talks in Washington as insincere political theater rather than genuine efforts to achieve a resolution. He describes the gathering of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas, and leaders from Egypt and Jordan as merely an attempt to project progress to American voters and appease the Arab world. According to Margolis, the participants were well aware that these talks would lead nowhere, as they merely repeated the same empty platitudes that have characterized Middle Eastern diplomacy for years. He asserts that the real power dynamics favor Israel, particularly under the Likud party, which is unlikely to accept the establishment of a viable Palestinian state.

The author elaborates on Israel's dominant position, noting that the Likud party is entrenched in its refusal to negotiate terms that would allow for a Palestinian state. He highlights the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and the systematic oppression of Palestinians through policies designed to make life unbearable, thereby encouraging emigration. Margolis points out that, as a result, the geographic and political fragmentation of the West Bank has become more pronounced, making the prospect of a contiguous Palestinian state nearly impossible. He argues that, despite some Israelis desiring peace, their voices are overshadowed by those who support the current hardline policies.

Finally, Margolis addresses the role of Hamas in the Palestinian political landscape, recognizing it as a legitimate representative of Palestinian aspirations, despite its exclusion from the recent talks. He critiques the Palestinian Authority, led by Abbas, as corrupt and unrepresentative of the broader Palestinian sentiment. Margolis laments the lack of U.S. pressure on Israel to pursue a meaningful peace agreement, linking this absence to the continued instability in the region and suggesting that without a fair resolution, cycles of violence, akin to the events of September 11, 2001, will persist. Ultimately, he posits that genuine peace is unattainable without addressing the root causes of the conflict, which include the aspirations of Palestinians for justice and self-determination.
OpenAI Outline Summary
# Outline of Eric Margolis' Article on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

## I. Introduction
A. Context of the Article
1. Reference to a previous article written by Margolis in 2001.
2. Prediction about the threat to U.S. interests due to the Palestine conflict.
3. Mention of the 9/11 attacks occurring shortly after the article's publication.

## II. The Urgency of Addressing Palestinian Suffering
A. President Obama’s Stance
1. Advocates for ending the suffering of Palestinians.
2. Views the situation as detrimental to American values, security, and prestige.

B. Margolis’ Analysis in "American Raj"
1. Explores how the Palestinian conflict fuels terrorism.
2. Suggests the U.S. is drawn into unnecessary conflicts with the Muslim world.

## III. The Recent Peace Talks in Washington
A. Description of the Talks
1. Involvement of key leaders: Netanyahu, Abbas, Mubarak, and Abdullah.
2. Characterized as a "painful farce" with no real progress.

B. Critique of Political Theater
1. Observations on the performative nature of the talks.
2. Intended to mislead American voters and appease the Arab world.
3. Lack of seriousness recognized by the broader Arab community.

## IV. The Imbalance of Power in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
A. Israel's Position
1. Likud party's refusal to support a Palestinian state.
2. Likud’s vision of a self-governing Arab entity akin to apartheid "Bantustans."

B. Political Statements and Actions
1. Rabbi Ovadia Yosef's inflammatory remarks about Mahmoud Abbas.
2. Violence in the region, including Palestinian attacks on Israeli settlers.

C. Uri Avnery’s Perspective
1. Likud's refusal to define final borders for Israel.
2. Expansionist tendencies within the Likud coalition.

## V. Israel's Strategy
A. Tactics of Negotiation
1. Continued discussions without genuine intent to resolve conflict.
2. Cosmetic concessions to placate U.S. demands while expanding settlements.

B. Conditions for Palestinians
1. Israeli checkpoints and security measures intended to pressure Palestinians to emigrate.
2. Expansion of settlements and land expropriation in the West Bank.

C. Current State of the West Bank
1. Emergence of fragmented Palestinian regions resembling "bantustans."
2. Increased Israeli security and control over Palestinian territories.

## VI. The Role of Neighboring States
A. Egypt and Jordan's Influence
1. Both countries maintain alliances with Israel.
2. Cooperation in suppressing Palestinian movements like Hamas.

B. Hamas’ Position
1. Exclusion from peace talks and rejection of negotiations.
2. Recognition of Hamas as a legitimate political voice despite its extremist reputation.

## VII. The Palestinian Authority's Legitimacy
A. Perception of the Palestinian Authority
1. Viewed as corrupt and aligned with Israeli and American interests.
2. Lack of representation for the Palestinian populace.

B. Public Opinion in Israel
1. Half of Israelis favor a "land for peace" deal.
2. Silence from the Israeli peace camp due to lack of U.S. support.

## VIII. The American Influence on the Conflict
A. Role of AIPAC
1. American Israel Public Affairs Committee's control over U.S. dialogue on the conflict.
2. Candidate Obama’s commitment to not pressure Israel for peace.

B. Consequences of Inaction
1. No pressure on Israel leads to stagnation in peace efforts.
2. Ongoing conflict results in further complications for U.S. relations with the Muslim world.
3. Potential for future terrorist attacks, echoing the sentiments leading up to 9/11.

## IX. Conclusion
A. Margolis’ Call for Change
1. Emphasizes the need for genuine peace efforts.
2. Warns against the consequences of continued neglect in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

## X. Author Information
A. Background on Eric Margolis
1. Author of "War at the Top of the World" and "American Raj."
2. Engages with themes of Western and Muslim world relations.
List of Bookmarks

On 2 Sept, 2001, in a newspaper article, I wrote: “America’s strategic and economic interests in the Mideast and Muslim world are being threatened by the agony in Palestine, which inevitably invites terrorist attacks against US citizens and property.”

The 9/11 attacks came nine days later.

President Barack Obama is absolutely right to seek an end to the endless suffering of Palestinians. It is an affront to humanity and gravely undermines America’s values, security and prestige.

In my most recent book, American Raj — America and the Muslim World, I tried to show how the poisonous conflict over Palestine has generated much of what we call “terrorism,” and how it is dragging the United States ever into a deeper but unnecessary conflict with the Muslim world.

For those yearning to see an end to the seven decade Jewish-Palestinian conflict, to see security and tranquility for Israel, and justice for Palestinians, last week’s so-called “peace talks” in Washington were a painful farce.

The result was the same kind of tired, stale Mideast political kabuki that has dragged on for the past decade: platitudes about peace, cheery handshakes, and talks about talks about talks.President Obama convoked Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to meet in Washington with Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas, Egypt’s strongman, Husni Mubarak, and Jordan’s King Abdullah.

All involved knew that this was political theater designed to beguile American voters into believing progress was being made in the eternal Mideast mess.

These faux peace talks were also supposed to send a message to the angry Arab world that the United States was indeed pushing for a fair peace in Palestine, and to show Israelis that their leader, PM Netanyahu, not long ago in Obama’s doghouse for humiliating visiting VP Joe Biden, was back in Washington’s good books in time for November elections.

Hardly anyone in the Arab or Muslim world took this charade seriously. The only people who don’t seem to really understand what’s going on are poorly informed North Americans.

America’s media dutifully reported the Washington talks with the same unquestioning solemnity and deference that the old Soviet media used to report Communist Party congresses.

In this game, Israel holds all the cards. The ruling right-wing Likud coalition insists it will never tolerate creation of a Palestinian state, the key to resolving this conflict. Never. At best, Likud says it may accept a self-governing Arab entity — in short, an old South African apartheid “Bantustan.”

Making things even grimmer, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the loose-lipped head of Netanyahu’s major coalition partner, the ultra-orthodox Shas Party, proclaimed god should strike dead the hapless Mahmoud Abbas. Palestinian gunmen killed four Israeli settlers on the West Bank.

As the brilliant Israeli writer Uri Avnery points out, Likud even refuses to define Israel’s final borders. According to Avnery, there remains an expansionist impulse within Likud and its hard-right coalition parties that foresees an even larger Jewish state.

Whatever the case, Netanyahu’s ruling Likud holds all the cards in this game. Israel’s strategy is simple: keep talking about peace talks, and make occasional cosmetic concessions to placate Washington, while speeding ahead with colonizing the West Bank and the nearly forgotten Golan Heights.

As a Palestinian diplomat aptly noted, “we are negotiating with Israel over dividing a pizza while Israel is busy eating it up.”

Israeli check points and security controls are in part designed to make life so miserable for Palestinians that they will emigrate. Israel’s expanding security walls are carving away yet more land.There are now 500,000 Jewish and non-Jewish Russian settlers on the West Bank in 121 settlements connected by special security roads off limits to Arabs. Much of the West Bank’s best farmland and underground water has been expropriated by Israel. Jewish Jerusalem keeps expanding into the West Bank through huge, fortified apartment buildings while Arabs in East Jerusalem are being steadily squeezed out, often with the help of tax-deductible donations by American Zionist groups.

Today, creation of a viable, contiguous Palestinian state looks hardly possible — and impossible tomorrow. Instead, the West Bank is becoming a patchwork of violent bantustans that are wholly dependent on Israel and surrounded by its security forces. Most Israelis are pleased because they no longer suffer as many bombings and attacks as they once did. But Palestinians and the Muslim world are outraged.

Watching “negotiations” between four American client states — Israel, Egypt, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority — who receive billions in US payments is beyond even acid Mideast cynicism. Egypt and Jordan, both close allies of Israel, have cooperated in the repression of the Palestinian movement Hamas. Neither wants to see a Palestinian state.

Hamas, penned up in the giant open-air prison camp of Gaza, was not invited to Washington. Hamas rejects peace talks and refuses to recognize Israel until Israel recognizes the claims of five million uprooted, stateless Palestinians.

But Hamas is also the legitimate voice of Palestinians, having been elected in a proper democratic election in 2006, the Arab world’s only honest vote since Algeria’s 1991 election that was subsequently quashed by the military, with French and US backing.

However extreme, Hamas is largely free of the endemic corruption infecting Mahmoud Abbas’ Palestinian Authority, which most Arabs regard as a bunch of Israeli and American stooges and yes-men. The Palestinian Authority certainly does not speak for most Palestinians.

Half of Israelis still want to make a land for peace deal with the Palestinians. Unfortunately, Israel’s peace camp has fallen silent and receives no backing from the United States.

The American dialogue on the Holy Land is almost entirely controlled by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which is virtually an arm of the Likud Party. Candidate Obama in fact promised AIPAC never to pressure Israel into a peace deal it did not want, a pledge he is keeping.

But no pressure on Israel by Washington to trade land for peace means no real peace, no matter what sweetheart deal Abbas signs. No real peace means more woes for the United States in dealing with the Muslim world. And it likely means more 9/11s.

Eric Margolis [send him mail] is the author of War at the Top of the World and the new book, American Raj: Liberation or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World. See his website.

(Republished from LewRockwell by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Israel 
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Eric Margolis Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
“America’s strategic and economic interests in the Mideast and Muslim world are being threatened by the agony in...
Bin Laden is dead, but his strategy still bleeds the United States.
Egyptians revolted against American rule as well as Mubarak’s.
A menace grows from Bush’s Korean blind spot.
Far from being a model for a “liberated” Iraq, Afghanistan shows how the U.S. can get bogged down Soviet-style.