The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewE. Michael Jones Archive
Requiem for a Figurehead
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Apparently the Critical Race theoreticians never learned that we are not to speak ill of the dead. This became apparent when the announcement of the death of Queen Elizabeth II of England spread through the ether on September 8, 2022. Uju Anya, an “anti-racist” associate professor at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, sparked outrage after calling the ailing queen the head of a “thieving, raping, genocidal empire” and concluded her diatribe by hoping that whatever pain she experienced while dying was “excruciating.”

In doing this Professor Anya played right into the hands of Tucker Carlson, who reacted to this execrable vituperation by resurrecting Whig History and giving a stirring defense of the British Empire, which he claimed was “the most benign empire the world had ever seen” to counter the race crowd’s claim that it was genocidal. “The British Empire was not perfect,” Carlson admitted, “but it was far more humane than any other ever. It was an impressive place run by impressive people. We will see many empires going forward, but we will never see one so benign.[1] Ever the Whig historian, Carlson went on to claim that “the British Empire spread Protestant Christianity to the entire world,” unaware that the Raj deliberately suppressed the promotion of Christianity in India because it threated the servile attitude imposed by the caste system. For another example of how the British spread the Gospel, I recommend the chapters on the ethnic cleansing of the French/Catholic Micmacs in Nova Scotia in Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict between Labor and Usury. When the Catholic Micmacs objected, the Presbyterian ministers who were sent to “spread Protestant Christianity” paid bounties for their scalps as their way of spreading the gospel. But I don’t want to dwell on atrocities in the wake of the queen’s death. De mortuus nil nisi bonum. If you’re interested in horror stories, I recommend #Irishtwitter or #Blacktwitter or #Inidantwitter. But more on that later.

Henry Makow responded by calling Carlson a “blue blood” who had “more in common with Anderson Cooper” because both men are involved in policing the oligarchic narrative. Makow identifies Carlson with the “false opposition” whose job is to “steer the narrative away from the central banking cartel and its Communist Jewish agenda: satanism and racism. Virtually the whole US ‘right’ falls into this category, including Trump and de Santis.” Makow claims that Carlson is a CIA agent, but as Laplace said to Napoleon when asked how God fit into his cosmic system, “We have no need that hypothesis.” By the end of the day, the discussion had settled into the familiar left vs right dialectic, which at this moment in history boils down to a choice between Uju Anya’s version of Critical Race Theory and Tucker Carlson’s resurrection of Whig History. If you choose either side as presented, you are comfortably inside the racial narrative which is the American regime’s favorite form of political control. And why is that? Because it ensures conflict—divide et impera—and it distracts us from the real armature of human history, which is always religious and ethnic.

The best way to see behind the pomp and circumstance surrounding the mainstream media narrative, or what Mark Twain would call the “funeral orgies,” and the official anti-narrative consisting of disgusting vilification of the dead is to start with Elizabeth’s namesake, Elizabeth I. The England Elizabeth II represented began with the looting operation known as the Reformation. Elizabeth I threw her lot in with the thugs who had stolen the property of the Catholic Church and were determined to hold on to it no matter what. When Queen Mary, Henry’s daughter and the rightful heir to the throne, married Philip II of Spain in the immediate wake of the first wave of looting, the Pope told Philip that he had to restore the stolen property to the Church. Maximillian, Philip’s hapless father, however, told him to avoid any direct confrontation because the arrival of an heir would solve the problem automatically. That hoped for heir never arrived, and the looters who were emboldened to enjoy their ill-gotten gains became determined to pass them on to their heirs in perpetuity, which has happened for the most part, but there was one problem. Property was not money. Labor can turn property into money, but the looters who had gotten rich from theft were cash poor and were too lazy to engage in hard work. The solution was to go to the usurers and mortgage their property for cash, which they spent until they went broke. Unable to keep up with compound interest, they lost their estates to the “Lombards,” who replaced the Jewish usurers after their expulsion in 1290. Usury followed the Reformation as night follows day.

As Shakespeare makes clear in his play Timon of Athens, the main problem facing England a generation down the road from the Reformation was debt, and debt continued to be a problem for the next 500 years. Capitalism is state-sponsored usury, and so it should come as no surprise that Capitalism began in England in the aftermath of the Reformation and invariably ended up with unrepayable debt.


The Jews who had been superseded by the Lombards returned to England in 1660 at the time of the restoration under Charles II, not as most people believed, under Cromwell during the interregnum. When James II became king, he had the solid support of the landed aristocracy in spite of his Catholicism because his impeccable hereditary credentials removed the stigma of illegitimacy which had plagued the monarchy since the time of Elizabeth I. That good will disappeared when James produced a male heir, an event which threatened to create a Catholic dynasty. Catholics were a double threat to the Whig oligarchs because Catholics refused to accept the legitimacy of usurious contracts, thereby threatening the power of the City whose motto was pacta sunt servanda no matter what. The result was the Glorious Revolution of 1688, which installed a Dutch usurper on the throne simply because he was a Protestant. William’s usurpation resurrected the legitimacy crisis which had vanished when the Stuarts ascended the throne, and it led to a century of unrest as one Jacobite Rising followed the other. In 1745, Bonnie Prince Charlie, the Stuart scion, came within 60 miles of London at the head of a Claymore wielding army of Scots, who were routed by the cannons George brought over from the continent. But England’s fate had been sealed by 1692 when the Whig oligarchs founded the Bank of England and turned that country into what William Cobbett referred to as a divided nation of taxpayers and tax-eaters. From that moment on, England became the slave of usury, unaware that all floating loans become unrepayable after 70 years. That happened in 1762. When Lord Townsend broke the bad news to Adam Smith, the great Scottish economist, decided to make the American colonies pay off the debt through the Stamp Act, which led to the American Revolution, which led to the French Revolution, which led to Napoleon, who was defeated at Waterloo, but not before Nathan Rothschild made a killing by speculating on the consul, the ever reliable British bond which would have been worthless if Napoleon had won.

Intoxicated by their victory over Napoleon, the English aristocracy, taking a lesson from their looting ancestors, embarked on a building spree which was financed by money borrowed from Jews like the Rothschilds, with predictable results. By the end of the 19th century, most of them had defaulted on their loans. They retained their titles in the Almanach de Gotha, which Oscar Wilde referred to as the greatest work of fiction in the English language, but their property reverted to the Jews who had lent them money.

One exception to this rule was Randolph Churchill, who saved his property for a time by marrying a rich American by the name of Jennie. Randolph eventually died of syphilis, 70,000 pounds in debt to Natty Rothschild, who forgave the debt, thereby ensnaring Randolph’s son Winston as a servant of Jewish interests. When the Jews wanted war with Germany, Winston collaborated with Lord Grey to bring that about. When the Germans signed an armistice, Winston responded by imposing a naval blockade and starving hundreds of thousands of Germans to death in an act which impressed a demobbed corporal by the name of Adolf Hitler, who vowed that this would never happen again. Churchill responded by creating a sequel known as World War II, during which he engaged in the systematic bombing of civilians, killing 300,000 in one night alone during the firebombing of Dresden.

Which brings us back to Queen Elizabeth II, who was a teenager during the war and stayed behind in London to encourage Britons during the Blitz. The fire-bombing of Dresden was five years in the future, but it is unlikely that she would have mentioned it had she given the same speech in 1945. She would go on to become queen in 1953 and then preside over the dismantling of the British Empire that Churchill fought to preserve. In what sense was she responsible for any of the atrocities I have mentioned? The brutal campaign to suppress the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya took place during her reign, but in what sense was she responsible for that? Elizabeth was a “figurehead,” to use the word Boris Johnson used in her eulogy, and as such she served as a distraction from the brutal acts necessary to preserve a failing empire. That was her job, and she did it very well. She performed brilliantly when she had tea with Paddington Bear. She even parachuted into Wembley Stadium holding her pink pocketbook. But the decline continued, and she never mentioned it. In fact, we might say that the decline of Britain continued because she never mentioned that it was happening. She was never prime minister, and even if she were the things that she couldn’t have changed were best left unmentioned. She was figurehead who couldn’t stop the decline in sexual morality which afflicted both her nation and her own family.

In his eulogy, Boris Johnson described Queen Elizabeth as “the woman so globally trusted that her images should be on every unit of our currency.” In addition to that Elizabeth was “the figurehead of our entire system, the keystone in the vast arch of the British state.” Only the queen “could be trusted to fulfill” that role “because only she could be above any party or commercial interest. . . to incarnate impartially the very concept and essence of the nation.” Elizabeth “created the modern constitutional monarchy.” Like Charles III, who is now King of England, Elizabeth was “Defender of the Faith.”

At this point things become a bit more complicated because Elizabeth was the head of the Anglican Church during a time in which that Church abandoned the sexual morality which characterized the English people from the rise of Methodism in the 18th century through the Victorian era until the Lambeth Conference of 1929, when the Anglican church admitted the liceity of contraception among married couples. Elizabeth was three years old at the time, but she was queen and head of the same Church which ordained first women and then homosexuals. Presumably she could have stopped that, but she didn’t, ensuring England’s spiritual decline.

As Tucker Carlson indicated in his monologue, the battle over Queen Elizabeth’s legacy took place on Twitter, which has become a hot bed of critical race theory and a platform for those who consider vilification of the dead a form of virtue signaling. #Irishtwitter joined forces with #Blacktwitter and #Indiantwitter in bringing up atrocities like the Irish potato famine, the Jallianwalla Massacre, during which unarmed Indian civilians were mowed down by British machine guns in Amritsar in 1919, and the already mentioned brutal suppression of the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya at the beginning of Elizabeth’s reign as queen. It was a daunting list of atrocities, and it could have been longer, but it was enough to cast doubt on Tucker Carlson’s reading of the British Empire as “the most benign empire the world had ever seen.”


As some indication of Twitter’s policy of even-handed fairness on matters like this, you could type in #Queen and listen to the moving eulogy which Boris Johnson delivered before the House of Parliament but only after being assaulted by at least four hardcore pornographic videos. The deliberate insertion of hardcore pornography into seemingly benign topics like #beauty or #Mary, which inserts pornography in between pictures of the Blessed Mother and the Rosary is proof that what purports to be an internet platform promoting the free exchange of ideas is nothing more than a form of psychological warfare which make the Israeli broadcast of pornography over Ramallah seem relatively “benign,” to use Tucker Carlson’s word, by comparison. Nothing epitomizes the wretched state of the world we live in better that the deliberate juxtaposition of devotional images and their blasphemous parodies, which are standard operating procedure at Twitter. Twitter’s policy is now the norm rather than the exception when it comes to cultural politics. The conservatives had already lost control of the National Endowment of the Arts under Bush I, as John Frohmeyer’s support of the homosexual Mapplethorpe photos showed. The American Library Association is run by a cabal of homosexuals who have turned local libraries into outlets for homosexual propaganda and the grooming of children via Drag Queen Story Hour, which has become a fixture of virtually every local library in the country.

A ruler is someone who wields political power of the sort that could put a stop to this abuse of common decency and bring about the reform of the communication technology which facilitates it. But when rulers are “figureheads” this does not happen. And so Queen Elizabeth was not only the paradigm of the constitutional monarch, as Boris Johnson pointed out, she was the model for every democracy as well, because they are all governed by figureheads who work against the interests of the people they represent and for the oligarchs who are the real powers behind virtually every throne on earth right now.

Germany’s foreign minister Annalena Baerbock, for instance, just announced that she was going to support the war in the Ukraine which is depriving Germany of its energy life’s blood, “no matter what the German voters think.” After denouncing Baerbock as a typical German victim of social engineering on Gemma O’Doherty’s podcast in Ireland, I was corrected by a listener from Germany who informed me that Baerbock wasn’t German because she is Jewish. That statement could have landed him in jail, but it clarified the situation enormously. It also resolved the perplexity at The Duran, as Alex and Alexander struggled to explain the hidden grammar which informs German finance minister Robert Habeck’s plan to destroy German industry. Missing from The Duran’s otherwise perspicacious analysis was the Jewish connection which linked Baerbock to the post-World War II Morgenthau Plan. Full of Jewish vengeance, Morgenthau attempted to turn Germany into a land of subsistence farmers with no industry at all, while literally starving the German population to death during das Hungerjahr of 1946-47. The common denominator which links das Hungerjahr of 1946-7and the coming Hungerwinter of 2022-3 is Jewish vengeance. Which is what Zelensky is now inflicting on the Ukraine, which he aspires to turn into “Big Israel,” once they defeat the Russians. One of the few non-Jewish villains in the Ukraine tragedy is former British prime minister Boris Johnson. The same man whose heartfelt eulogy described Queen Elizabeth II as a “figurehead” vetoed Zelensky’s attempt to negotiate a peace settlement in March, bringing about a war that still hasn’t ended and the deaths of thousands of soldiers and tens of thousands of Ukrainian citizens.

Nothing in Elizabeth’s life became her like the leaving it. The last photo of the Queen shows her smiling benignly—that word again—as she hands the reins of power over to Liz Truss, a loyal servant of the World Economic Forum. Similarly, nothing epitomized the state of England at the time of Elizabeth’s death better than Twitter’s juxtaposition of the royal pomp and circumstance surrounding her funeral with the raunchy pornography which became ubiquitous during her reign. That is the England Elizabeth left behind as Defender of the Faith when she allowed homosexuals to become priests and bishops in the Church of England. Because we are talking about the internet, we are talking about the world in which we live and move and have our being. More importantly, we have to work in this world whether we like it or not. In a world like this we long for a ruler who will free us from this wretched form of bondage. Where is Fortinbras when we need him? Queen Elizabeth II was not that ruler. Nor in all probability will that ruler be her son Charles III, who succumbed to sexual temptation in a way that his mother did not. I know Dutchmen, however, who see Putin as their only hope in liberating themselves from the tyrannical failed state known as the gay disco.



Hide 248 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. saggy says: • Website

    Yes Siree, EMJ in fine form.

    Earlier in the day, at the beach, while my wife was swimming, I read Chapter 4 – England, in E. Mullins ‘The Curse of Canaan’, which is in the same vein … even moreso.

    The stuff these fellows know makes me, and I assume most people, feel like an ignoramus, which, of course I am!

    And I was in Mensa (to meet women only).

  2. Notsofast says:

    the old bat was the head of the firm and not nearly as innocuous as you paint her. ask the people of australia how they liked having their democratic government overturned because they voted the wrong way (and people say democracy doesn’t work).
    but, as you say, let us not speak ill of the dead, so join me in song:

    god save our gracious queen,
    she ain’t no human being,
    she’s reptilian…

  3. Dutch Boy says:

    “And so Queen Elizabeth was not only the paradigm of the constitutional monarch, as Boris Johnson pointed out, she was the model for every democracy as well, because they are all governed by figureheads who work against the interests of the people they represent and for the oligarchs who are the real powers behind virtually every throne on earth right now.”
    Nothing written has summed up our predicament better.

  4. Winston Churchill was a key figure in the destruction of the British Empire. Historians have learned not to discuss this fact:

    • Thanks: Avery, Joe Levantine
  5. Icy Blast says:

    Where would we be without EMJ to inform and enlighten us? And thanks are due to the enigmatic Mr. Unz for publishing EMJ’s work here.

    Meanwhile, mediocrities such as the perpetually enraged Sodomite “Jung/Freud” are angrier than ever.

  6. Ghali says:

    For more than seven decades, the Monarch watched the Jews massacring Palestinian women and children in broad daylight. She never utter a word of criticism towards the criminal Jews as they perpetuated their Palestinian holocaust. She supported and applauded the British regime criminal complexity in the mass murder of the Iraqi civilians since 1991 war, economic terrorism (sanctions) and war of aggression and criminal invasion. Good riddance and rest in hell.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  7. Anon[314] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m sure Mr Jones is aware that “Defender of the Faith” meant defender of the Catholic faith.. as it was granted by the Pope to Henry VIII before his lower passions won the day.

    That the English Monarchs kept it and use it is but one more examples of the British unparalleled propaganda ability. Imagine the chutzpah of calling a vain, promiscuous, sterile woman (perhaps rendered sterile by an STD), who surrounded herself with necromancers (that used Aztec obsidian daggers and brazen heads to channel spirits) and savage pirates (duly rewarded with titles and MP) their greatest “Virgin Queen”.

    There are, nonetheless, only two real monarchies left in Europe, the Vatican and the House of Windsor. True, theirs is a “soft power”, insubstantial but real. Yet the days of monarchies are running out, as the orchestrated attacks on the Spanish monarchy make abundantly clear. It seems we are being groomed for a balkanization of the Western world, Spain, France, USA, Hispanoamerica, anyplace where there are tribes to be agitated into civil war.

    Which monarchy will fall last, the Vatican or the House of Windsor?

    PS.- Phillip II’s father was Charles V.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    , @Curmudgeon
  8. Annalena Baerbock is a Protestant. Someone was pulling your leg.

    • Replies: @TGD
    , @Mary Bennett
  9. E Michael Jones wants to import Nigerian LEGAL IMMIGRANTS into America-why is that? Does Tucker Carlson want to do that?

    The late Queen of England was an enthusiast for importing African and Pakistani LEGAL Immigrants into England…and E Michael Jones has no problem with this.

    Over and over again on his Fox News, Tucker Carlson has expressed his anger at the racial transformation of America via nonwhite immigration policy. E Michael Jones supports an Immigration Policy that is identical to the ADL’s Immigration Policy.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  10. Franz says:

    the looting operation known as the Reformation

    Yes and no. You rob a thief, the crime is? The Roman Church simply took the sacred places of Britain AND the adjacent lands and called it theirs. They allowed the peasants who were natives on that land to grow their crops “on church land” but… what besides Rome’s inflated ego made is so?

    Point is the land would have been divided up by the natives sooner or later. Always is. Wait till Bill Gates finds out he has less right to the “farmland” he owns than Pope Innocence.

    Tucker just wanted to swat the twats. Okay by me, whig or bald.

    • Agree: JM
    • Disagree: Emslander
    • Troll: Eric Novak
    • Replies: @Hibernian
  11. Baerbock is not Jewish. EMJ is right on the main point the world today is a pornified hellhole, especially for children. The modern popes, however, didn’t fare any better than QEII did in trying to stop it.

    • Agree: USGrant
    • Replies: @JM
  12. Irish football fans know how to celebrate the passing of Queen Lizzy (sung to the tune of K.C & the Sunshine Band’s ‘Give it Up’):

    You gotta love those Irish.

    One figurehead of the corrupt Anglo-Zionist empire is down, now it’s King Chuck’s turn to have a Covid vaccine adverse effect like his mum and drop dead.

    • Replies: @JM
    , @Swaytonious
  13. Nancy says:

    Aha!! Hasbara once again the quickest on the draw 🙂 First again!!

  14. Rush says:

    Regarding Rothschild ‘speculating on the consul’ comcerning Waterloo it seems EMJ is referring to the Duke of Wellington as consul and Rothschild bet he would win. If so or if not he was not speculating but betting on a sure thing if the story about his ‘speculation’ is correct. This being that Rothschild had his agents travelling as camp followers with Wellington, or tagging along” with homing carrier pigeons they carried and when Wellington prevailed they released their pigeons carrying the message Wellington had prevailed. Rothschild then sold almost all of his stocks and the market, knowing how well he was kept informed, read that as a sign he had learned Napoleon had won the day. So the market crashed in panic selling and Rothschild swooped in and bought back all his stock and more plus still left with a massive profit on the trade.

    • Replies: @EH
  15. An evil blood drinking pedophile crypto-Jewess that was servant to greater powers (of evil) at the international level–I won’t shed a tear.

    • Agree: Sam Smith
  16. anonymous[555] • Disclaimer says:

    [but, as you say, let us not speak ill of the dead,]

    Why shouldn’t any wise and just person talk about this criminal whose empire is responsible for so many crimes against humanity for the past few century, especially since 1952 where she became a ‘queen’? So many coup, assassinations, bombing, invasion, robbery, and sanctions killing people where still is going on and her son is going to commit more crimes against humanity because the reign of the West is coming to an end. We are in the transitional period.

    • Replies: @Ace
  17. Here in India they burst crackers and dances on the streets on the death of the “old witch”. Nobody hates the British and white people in general more than Indians. No race, culture or nation has this much pent up hatred and animosity.

    My own personal opinion? Despite being an Anglophile I’ve never been too big on the monarchy. I respected Elizabeth 2 a lot and felt if all the world leaders had her ethos and stoic temperament the world would be better off. But after she is gone i think they should just wrap the whole system. Charles is a tree hugger, Andrew is a criminal and the less said about Harry and Megs the better.

    Overall I feel a benevolent dictator is the only solution to all the pain and chaos in society. A Napoleon or a Churchill is what is needed. Democracy is, and was always a sham.

    • Agree: Ace, Sarita
    • Troll: Sam Smith, Eric Novak
    • Replies: @HdC
    , @Angharad
  18. anonymous[194] • Disclaimer says:

    The same day Elizabeth II became Queen after George VI died, 6 February 1952, Britain hanged 2 men … and then went on to hang some dozens more until the last killings under Britain’s death penalty, on 13 August 1964 … barbaric events which the Queen permitted to occur. One wonders if she ever thought about those people dying at the end of a rope under her authority.

    It should be noted that death by hanging is nearly always by slow strangulation, taking some minutes to nearly an hour, tho sometimes (not reliably) there is a merciful instant coma if the neck is broken in a long drop. List of all those hanged by permission of Queen Elizabeth II, by year and date:

    Photo of King Charles III, when still Prince Charles, having matters explained to him by Sir Evelyn de Rothschild

  19. The brutal campaign to suppress the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya

    was not and by far, as brutal as were the Mau Mau themselves – if I can trust Sir David Kelly’s Die hungernde Herde (R. Piper & Co Verlag, München 1959, translation of “The Hungry Sheep”), in particular the chapter “Der Irrweg unserer Kolonialpolitik” pp. 140-166 where the Mau Mau horrors are (briefly but unforgettably) mentioned. Some of the “less remarkable” (“weniger aufsehenerregenden”) facts were, for instance, unborn babies cut out and stuffed into their mother’s mouth, and 3- to 4-year old British kids bleeding to death after their hands were cut off.

    • Thanks: Ace, Pop Warner
    • Replies: @polaco
  20. chris says:


    For my part, ever since I remember, I had always been politely agnostic toward “the queen” and the monarchy in general until I read a statement released on her behalf regarding Assange (I think from 2020) where she apparently said that she would not comment on his fate or treatment as this was a ‘political matter.’ It turned my stomach to read that – a journalist is being tortured in a British prison is a damnable blot on British and all Western society which accepts such a thing.

    That a monarch, the supposed head of a church, should weasel her way out of any and all moral responsibility, and shirk even the vaguest form of humanity I found downright repugnant.

    To be fair, it couldn’t have been lost on her that it may not have been a great idea to get on the wrong side of the US’ legal establishment, given “prince” Andrew’s own entanglement with that “body,” however, the mildest allusion to a fair treatment for Assange could not possibly have jeopardized anyone; and simply as a human being she should have made even a symbolic gesture in that direction.

    In the final instance, maybe she should have spent less time and energy playing “queen” for the cheap adulation of “her people” and been a better mother to her wayward children. Maybe then she would have been able to hold on to a little more of her humanity.

    However, that this moral midget should be laid to rest like some benevolent God who has showered humanity in goodnesses is like a sick joke and a barometer of the moral confusion of our age.

    Unlike our predecessors, we actually do have all the information necessary to make a balanced judgement of her actions. In the end, she was nothing more than the the cheap lipstick on the swine of British body politic.

    That we should honor this moral ship wreck, who bequeathed knighthood onto that lowlife scumbag Tony Blair, a first class lackey, instrumental in leading his and other nations into an unjust war which killed maybe millions is the final proof of her utter moral bankruptcy and of the system that this cheap tramp ran tricks for.

    • Agree: Notsofast
    • Replies: @Joe Levantine
    , @Sarita
  21. Z-man says:

    Mancow, good Jew..but still a joo. However he wrote a great article on satanic Jewlywood, the one on the movie ‘Knocked Up’ way back when.

    Uju Anja, nigger, female one at that. ‘Nuff said.

    Tucker Carlson, not perfect but he’s the best we’ve got in the MSM.

    Article, too long and conflicted but ok.

    • Agree: 24th Alabama
    • Replies: @JR Foley
  22. Ed Case says:

    So, how did MENSA pan out for you?

  23. Z-man says:

    Interesting bit on the Churchills and, if the author would check, Boris Johnson has some Semitic blood, I believe.

    • Agree: USGrant
  24. Ed Case says:

    Whitlam was massively on the nose in Australia by March 1975, and why not?
    Unemployment due to his Madcap Policies had gone from 3,000 at his Election in 1972 to 500,00 2 years later.
    A Caretaker Government was appointed on November 11 and the fresh Election held a month later.
    Whitlam’s Government was slaughtered at that Poll.
    What you’re really railing against here isn’t Queen, it’s the democratic choice made by the Australian people in 1975.

    • Replies: @JM
    , @Kim
  25. GMC says:

    Interesting theory – maybe { rumour} that is why President Putin would never walk near her , after he found out. He must have gotten the old reptoidal evil eye glance. LOL It certain;y would only take one time , after seeing Prince Charley or some other elitist, to perform his shapeshifting act, and every Human wannabe leader would toe the line after that. Anything is possible today, after all, the entire World is on the big poker table – as we write. Look at how Orwell’s book came out.

    • LOL: Notsofast
    • Replies: @Notsofast
  26. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:

    How ironic the remarks of Uju Anya when one only need observe Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit, etc, to see that America’s black populations are the true thieving, raping animals that take a peculiar delight in genociding each other. No need for them to have an excruciating death, I wouldn’t wish that on anybody, but just go as quickly as possible so the rest of us can live in peace.

  27. Doctor EMJ never fails to deliver.
    The angloids and prot heresy are absolutely vile and satanic. But the amerimutt identity is through and thorugh bound to this abomination, just like how eastern Europe and Russia will always be bound to the Holohoax.

    We hope for their return to the Truth and breaking their shackle so we can all rejoice in the One and Holy, Apostolic Catholic Church and expelling the yids for eternity. But I’m not holding my breath for that, haha.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    , @Angharad
  28. Mr. Jones,

    I believe you are a Catholic. If not, please disregard this comment. You rightly criticize the Queen for presiding over Homosexuals becoming priests in the Church of England. But, have you criticized the Catholic Church priests, bishops, Cardinals, etc for not coming down like a hammer on the pedophile priests in their own Church? I have not followed this question that closely, but it is my understanding that the pedophile problem was known all the way up to the Pope, and very little was done about it. The offending priests were simply transferred to other parishes where they could continue their disgusting behavior. I am a lapsed Catholic and have often thought about returning to the fold, but I can’t as long as this Pope Francis is the top man and the pedophile priest problem has not been solved once and for all.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Anonymous12890
  29. Hegar says:

    Elizabeth I threw her lot in with the thugs who had stolen the property of the Catholic Church

    Aw, Catholic Michael Jones angry. This is why caths should not be allowed to Germanic-built countries, bringing their hatred with them. The Catholic Church stole from the people for centuries until they were stopped, and then angry Jones says those who stopped it are “thugs”. Sure.

    The priests in a town in France wanted to build a cathedral, so they paid bandits to raid the countryside to steal money. The local nobility joined the people in fighting back against the Catholic robbers. Jones would no doubt call them “thugs”. The Cath Church started out by killing tens of thousands of other Christians, and kept killing other Christians and non-Christians from that point on, while demanding that people hand over money. Bishopries and even the Pope chair were sold to the highest bidder, and the priests took bribes to take sides in politics. Jones calls those who resist this crime enterprise “thugs”. You seriously think Yeshua (Jesus) would have sided with these criminals, who even took pleasure in torturing other Christians by burning their feet and breaking their bones?

    • Agree: Angharad
  30. Hibernian says:

    “…divided up by the natives…”

    It was sold off by the King to finance his Wars. Previously it had supported the Poor.

    • Replies: @JM
  31. Hibernian says:

    The annals of history post Reformation are full of Protestant Wars, Protestant slave trading, Protestant piracy, Protestant genocide, Protestant political chicanery, etc., etc.

  32. Hibernian says:

    You are working overtime to give us your fellow Catholics a bad name.

    • Replies: @Swaytonious
  33. Thomasina says:

    Boris Johnson’s maternal great-grandfather, Elias Avery Lowe, was a Moscow-born Jew, according to the Jerusalem Post.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  34. Dumbo says:

    This is why caths should not be allowed to Germanic-built countries, bringing their hatred with them.

    Bavaria, the best part of Germany, is Catholic.

    Of course the Reformation was just a looting operation, with the corruption of the Church as just the excuse.

    • Replies: @Brooklyn Dave
  35. Seraphim says:

    Congratulations! You are the only one who remarked this slight blunder of Mr. Jones.

  36. Z-man says:

    That’s a great picture which I’ve seen before. It should be in every middle school in England and elsewhere.

    • LOL: chris
  37. Anonymous[372] • Disclaimer says:

    God Almighty doesn’t listen to the wishes of woke black whores like Uju Anya!

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  38. “ Germany’s foreign minister Annalena Baerbock, for instance, just announced that she was going to support the war in the Ukraine which is depriving Germany of its energy life’s blood, “no matter what the German voters think.” After denouncing Baerbock as a typical German victim of social engineering on Gemma O’Doherty’s podcast in Ireland, I was corrected by a listener from Germany who informed me that Baerbock wasn’t German because she is Jewish.”

    And the Germans still take it lying down. Are Germans truly a race. Is Germany truly a country. Whichever race or people become so deficient at fighting back will have relinquished their right to survive. If the coming social and economic malaise does not stir in Germans their fighting spirit or their killer instinct, it would be high time to play a requiem for Germany and the Germans.

    Germany’s greats, too many to list, must be spinning in their graves.

    • Replies: @Icy Blast
  39. JM says:
    @Jack Boniface

    But EMJ covers for them. Historically Roman Catholic Ireland, a Century separated from the overlordship of the English, including of their Monarch, hasn’t been saved from moral, political and economic degeneracy within the clutches of the Money Power.

    Had the Queen been a Monarch defending the Roman Catholic faith with a similar record, I suspect that the spleen from our Irish Catholic brethren, including EMJ, would be subdued.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  40. your Latin is wrong:

    De mortuus[‘mortuis’ is correct] nil nisi bonum.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  41. Sam Smith says:

    Requiem for a Shithead!

  42. JM says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    And by the same token, when the Reset loving Pope is in a box, we’ll all be saved? I doubt it. Another tool, nay component, of the Global Oligarchy would soon take his place.

  43. @saggy

    “And I was in Mensa (to meet women only).”

    You must’ve liked the librarian type.

    • LOL: geokat62, geokat62
    • Replies: @IreneAthena
  44. profnasty says:

    Scuttlebutt has it HIMARS has turned Russia around. This may indicate a tectonic historical shift.
    Was the Queen defending Putin? Is her death his defeat? Will Mother Russia bring out the big guns? Why not destroy Kiev’s government with MOABs?
    So many questions. So much racial conflict.

    • Replies: @pyrrhus
  45. @chris

    Great post with so many valid points. But, the other reigning monarchs from Vatican City were as morally deficient when they were supposed to be the gate keepers of the true faith. Queen Elizabeth was the head of the Anglican Church which was a political church right from her very inception. Vatican City has always begotten political power by claiming to be the guardian of Christianity with the pope as the Vicar of Christ. From Paul VI to Francis, the Catholic Church was hardly a beacon of justice and integrity. She failed to stand up to the fallacies of the Jews in the domains of history and finance. The depravity of Francis speaking in favour of homo marriages ( who am I to judge) and the forced vaccines make all the sins of Queen Elizabeth look asinine.

    • Replies: @chris
    , @GenFranco
  46. Spain and Portugal had Christianized the world long before England got in the act.

    • Thanks: Hibernian
    • Replies: @24th Alabama
  47. JM says:
    @Ed Case

    What you’re really railing against here isn’t Queen, it’s the democratic choice made by the Australian people in 1975.

    Not mainly.

    His real motive is to falsely claim a role of the British Monarch in the dismissal of the government. The foreign force behind that was the US State Department/CIA with a compliant Governor General using his “Reserve Powers” to dismiss Whitlam, appoint the Leader of the Opposition as Caretaker Prime Minister and setting a date for an election.

    The great majority of the “Republicans” have no intention of removing these Reserve Powers. This “republican” move, being without real political substance, has a very ethno-religious motivation. Were the Monarch a protector of the Roman Catholic Faith and not the Church of England, most of the wind would be taken from their sails. Of course such motivations are always cloaked in the garb of High Principle and what is higher than “Republicanism”?

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
  48. Cold Zero says:

    Seems everyone with an axe to grind has got to get their licks in – go for it. Throw your flowers against the wall for all the effect it will have.

    The nasty social justice warriors are minuscule pygmies hurling hairlike spears at a giantess who is past caring. Their only accomplishment is to gain the spotlight for a few minutes for their extreme statements – just more inconsequential flowers against the wall.

    I’m no royalist, in fact I find the idea kind of silly in an endearing way, but I am surprised and impressed by the spontaneous turnout of the masses the queen’s passing has generated. She was obviously much loved by many more of her countrymen than her detractors would like to admit.

  49. E Michael Jones….who looks like an insect…does not like The Native Born White American Working Class…….But E Michael Jones does like race-replacing Native Born White Working Class Americans with Nigerian Negro Immigrants and their Nigerian Negro US Born Children…………..Is E Michael Jones a Cuck?

    Is E Michael Jones a Cuck?

  50. Coconuts says:

    hmmm… The Three Headed Beast: Reformation, Revolution, Romanticism.

  51. profnasty says:

    A picture worth a trillion word\$.

    • LOL: chris
  52. Kim says:
    @Ed Case

    Didn’t matter how people voted in the end. Both parties were and are in favor of mass immigration, state run medicine, endless urban sprawl, big developers, multiculturalism, feminism, the five eyes, immoral wars for israel, and globalism.

    But few of those things do people get to vote on.

  53. EH says: • Website

    No, I think he meant speculating on consols, which were perpetual government bonds.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
  54. Ross23 says:

    The best quote i heard on QE2 was – she was a nice old lady that outlived her country.

    Same for any other British person over the age of 70.

    • Agree: Hibernian
  55. Queen Elizabeth did nothing to stop or reduce the Muslim and African invasion of Britain. Granted, that may not have been her job or even her place politically, but couldn’t she have at least tried to influence others to awaken and combat the hordes of non-Whites who were flooding London and other cities?

    If she truly cared, and if she didn’t want Whites in England to become a minority in their own country, she could have spoken up and denounced the invasion of her land. But like most Brits, the Queen did not understand racial realities (or at least never indicated it publicly). She probably thought as do almost all deracinated Whites that racial ‘diversity is our strength’ and other foolish beliefs. She was taught ‘They’re just like us,’ but as many Brits have finally discovered, those Africans and Muslims are not like us at all.

    Enoch Powell tried to warn the British people over 50 years earlier that if Muslim and African immigration was not stopped, they would overtake the country in sheer numbers since their birthrate was greater. But very few listened. Powell was laughed at by the British elite, but who is getting the last laugh today?

    • Agree: YesYesCircle
    • Replies: @Che Guava
  56. profnasty says:

    There is a sigh of relief in a town
    When a rabid dog is put down.

  57. I’d love to see Mr. Jones as a guest on the Duran. The problem is that he’d have to pull his punches concerning the JQ, which EMJ wouldn’t do. I love the 2 Alex’s, who do yeoman’s work on the Duran, but, when it comes to the JQ, it’s obvious that they look the other way so that they won’t get banned from YouTube.

    Also, as a compulsive Carlson watcher, I was disappointed that he so vociferously defended the monarchy and Queen E’s reign. A monarch with no power, or, worse yet, one who has power but refuses to use it for the benefit of her “subjects,” is an abomination and has no legitimate reason to keep existing. I hope that Charles III, a founder of The Great Reset, has a very troubled reign which leads to the storming of Buckingham Palace the end of this ghastly Royalty.

    • Replies: @Dutch Boy
    , @Eric Novak
  58. chris says:
    @Joe Levantine

    I agree of course, Joe about the ridiculous moral failings of both Vatican and „the house of Winsor.“

    It‘s just that the British monarchy, enshrined, as it is symbolically, at the top of it’s government and common wealth does represent and stand for that government and its corruption, whereas belief or participation in the Vatican is strictly voluntary.

    • Agree: Joe Levantine
  59. Che Guava says:

    I read somewhere that ERII made three direct political interventions.

    First, appointing Macmillan to be P.M.

    Second, forcing Thatcher to drop recognition of Rhodesia.

    Third, forcing Thatcher to apply sanctions to Sth. Africa.

    I would expect that other examples exist, but are more strictly hidden.

    Still, having spent part of my growing up in a place where they would play a clip of the young her in ceremonial military uniform on a horse, taken long before my birth, before any films, and everyone would stand, she played the part well as a young monarch.

    Except for a slight case of hamster-cheeks, she also looked quite pretty in that clip.

  60. Phillip II’s father was Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, and commonly known as The Great. Maximilian was Phillip II’s greatgrandfather.

    (Were it not for troublesome facts ever getting in the way, reading E. Michael Jones would be one of my keenest pleasures.)

  61. @War for Blair Mountain

    I don’t think dude is an insect or a cuck, but I do think it’s unwise policy to add ANY blacks to the US population, as they are difficult to manage and generally follow a parasitic survival strategy. And who needs miscegenation (unless it’s caucasian/Asian, which is hot)?

    • Replies: @Charles Martel France
  62. Anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jud Jackson

    EMJ has been openly critical of the lavender mafia and the cover-up. He has a reputation among Catholic leadership as a muckraker in South Bend and Notre Dame in these matters and was even a character with such a reputation in the novels/mysteries of the late Ralph McInerny* (the character was referred to as “The Savonarola of South Bend”).

    *McInerny was a noted Thomist philosopher at Notre Dame, a mystery writer (“Father Dowling”, et al.), a friend of EMJ’s, and benefactor to EMJ’s magazine (Fidelity, which is now called Culture Wars).

    EMJ has also taken the position that a lot of the investigations and news of the Catholic clergy scandals is manufactured and/or slanted in a false flag sense to be used as a weapon against the Catholic Church and to weaken her influence in political and moral issues (not to mention her critical role in the salvation of souls). Not dissimilar to the NY AG, US DOJ, et al., investigating Trump, indicting people around him, etc., for crimes, corruption and coverup.

    More than half of the 10-12 priests featured in the Boston Globe exposé (“Spotlight”, which was made into a 2015 Hollywood movie) had left the priesthood, had been defrocked, or were in prison for their crimes (e.g., former priest Paul Shanley had left priesthood, moved to California, and started a gay B & B with his boyfriend). To put things in perspective, during the time period the Boston Globe research covered— dating back 50 years— roughly 60k priests had served in the Boston Archdiocese.

    The Spotlight piece covered a dozen. Witch-hunt allegations and investigations in the 2000’s (with 7-figure payouts to any accusers) resulted in criminal investigations and prosecutions in only dozens of cases with some of the accused already deceased. Experts in the matter, such as sociologist Richard Jenkins, put the percentage of pedophile priest slightly lower than the general population.

    There have been and still are bad and evil men in the Church. They existed even among Christ’s hand-picked Apostles.

    We know the devil’s number one target is Christ’s True Church and we most be careful not to be an unwitting or witting accomplice by believing and propagating the lies and distortions of those we can plainly see are doing the devil’s bidding in media, politics, entertainment, et al.

    • Agree: Dutch Boy, Irish Savant
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  63. anon[806] • Disclaimer says:

    lets cut the bullshit, all Anglos should just be counted as part of global Jewry. white Americans, Canadians, Australians and the original Cromwell-cocksucking UK limey faggots should be considered part of the kike diaspora. and these subhuman mutts deserve the same karma as the actual jews themselves for destroying and polluting Eurasia for the past 200 years (and continuing to this day)

  64. Miro23 says:

    Similarly, nothing epitomized the state of England at the time of Elizabeth’s death better than Twitter’s juxtaposition of the royal pomp and circumstance surrounding her funeral with the raunchy pornography which became ubiquitous during her reign. That is the England Elizabeth left behind as Defender of the Faith when she allowed homosexuals to become priests and bishops in the Church of England.

    Frankly true. The Queen and the Royal Family did exactly nothing between 1952 – 2022 to defend the faith and the interests of the British (English, Scots, Welsh, Northern Irish) people.

    So, long overdue for them to move out and make way for true national defenders.

    J.K.Rowling is worth more than the whole lot of them put together.

  65. @anonymous

    That single picture of Charles being disrespectfully pointed at demonstrates what everyone needs to know.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @Che Guava
  66. You want to get right down with Queen Elizabeth was a complete failure with everything other then keeping the Windsor dynasty afloat. Having said that so much history was on display with the her death and the ascension of Charles III. For all of you who want to rid yourselves of the monarchy, I feel your pain but respectfully disagree. The Windsors are unwittingly keep my Anglo Saxon traditions alive, albeit barely. Rid them, and the Paki-Hindu takeover will be all but complete with the Anglo Saxon history deleted fully. The replacement wins. The genocide would then be in mop up mode. Keep the worthless Windsors because they will unwittingly will always stand for the beleaguered natives. Think I’m wrong? Why else would Soros and Rothschild waste their time hooking up Harry with a D listed and quarter black actress? They have to separate the native Brits from their monarchy and history.

    • Agree: Swaytonious
    • Replies: @Kali
  67. @War for Blair Mountain

    Why State the Obvious ?

    Especially When…………….. You Need Some…………….. Proof-Reading, Friend.

  68. Queen Elizabeth II was not that ruler. Nor in all probability will that ruler be her son Charles III

    Chuckie being besties with Schwab and the WEF crowd, things are likely to get orders of magnitude worse in the near future.

  69. anonymous[140] • Disclaimer says:

    Good riddance and rest in hell.

    Yes, except she will not be “resting.” Her pagan godless imperialist diseased soul will be burning in torment for all eternity. What use is an exceptionally rich and “charmed” life if the end is eternal torment?

    And yes, she will be joined by all her Chrizzie pagan godless mangods-worshipping albinonigger brethren.

    • Troll: Swaytonious
  70. TGD says:

    Jones: … a listener from Germany who informed me that Baerbock wasn’t German because she is Jewish…

    Another example of EMJ’s proclivity to “make things up out of whole cloth.” Moreover this statement exposes Jones for what he really is: a Nazi masquerading as a devout Catholic. The Nazi ideology recognized only race as a marker of nationality. So Fräulein Baerbock could never be “a German.”

    • Replies: @schrub
    , @Irish Savant
  71. Interesting title: “Requiem for a Figurehead”. In the dictionary, the word figurehead is defined as: “a nominal leader or head without real power.” But no one has real power, because power is an illusion, as the careful reader of history will see. The failure to see is plunging mankind towards WW III.

    • Troll: Meretricious
  72. GenFranco says:
    @Joe Levantine

    “[The Church] failed to stand up to the fallacies of the Jews in the domains of history and finance.”

    False. You have much reading to do. Jews and secular gentile historians will help you, as they have documented the “outrageous antisemitism” of the Church (popes, theologians, saints, monarchs) who have done the very thing that you claim the Church has not done. This was pre-Vatican II of course. The “history of Catholic anti-Semitism,” so well-documented by anti-Catholic historians, is a history of the Church standing up to usurious, perfidious jewish power.

    “The depravity of Francis speaking in favour of homo marriages ( who am I to judge) and the forced vaccines make all the sins of Queen Elizabeth look asinine.”

    Post Vatican II, done by the very people have made war (from the inside) upon the Church that stood up to the jews. If you don’t understand the difference between the actual Catholic Faith and the globalist nonsense spewed by post-Vatican II ideologues, this topic is probably a bit tough for you.

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon, Bubba
  73. sb says:

    The Queen had nothing to do with Governor General Kerr’s sacking of Whitlam and anyone with any knowledge of the topic knows this.
    But I recognise that the actual facts are not going to stop your view of the matter.
    For the record I consider Kerr was constitutionally bound to tell Whitlam of his intentions in which case it would have been a matter of who sacked who first. But that’s not what you are talking about.

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
  74. Agent76 says:

    Apr 22, 2020 Rare Footage Documents Queen Elizabeth’s Coming of Age During Second World War

    Rare archive footage tells the story of a young Princess Elizabeth’s ‘coming of age’ during the Second World War. As the Commonwealth endures the coronavirus pandemic, the Queen has made comparisons between the current crisis and the hardship of the war years.

  75. TGD says:

    Photo of King Charles III, when still Prince Charles, having matters explained to him by Sir Evelyn de Rothschild.

    Sir Evelyn bears a very close resemblance to the late US Congressman and Hungarian Jew Tom Lantos.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  76. Jews started coming during the reign of Charles I (Charles II was just born) for whatever reason (maybe toleration of religion).

    However Jews were encouraged to come under Cromwell couple decades later. The reasons were Protestant or radical Puritan beliefs in millennialism and wanting to convert Jews to Christianity. Also economic “benefits” of Jews from Netherlands (who ran away from the Spanish Inquisition).

    These were largely Sephardi Jews and merchants.

    Protestant dissenters tended to be Whiggish (radical or conservative)
    Anglicans Tory
    Catholics crypto Tory or later radical Whig.

  77. Dutch Boy says:

    In defense of TC, there have been so many brutal empires in history, one could make the case that the British was the least brutal (or maybe in the top five thereof). TC is an Episcopalian, which makes him part of the Anglo-American home team and one is always tempted to root for the home team no matter what. Dr. Jones is quite correct that Americans are herded into the mental prison bounded by Whiggism (roughly the GOP) and Jewish Wokism (the Dems) and Carlson is no exception.

  78. Anon[120] • Disclaimer says:

    It looks like people are always blinded by the glitter. If anything, the Royal Family has shone the searchlights directly into the eyes of the population, both in the UK and abroad. We seem to be deeply impressed with the rich, famous and royal never once stopping to think that they are not impressed with us. Why do we love them ? when they do not love us !

    Its amusing to see the Royals “meeting and greeting” their unwashed flock. If I could look into their royal brains I would hear some thought like this:

    “I got to shake this Negro;s hands ? He looks like a fucking Ape. I got to social distance from this greasy curry reeking Babu. Should I smile at her ? I’ll just nod at that slimy Paki, that dirt under his nails is probably dried up shit. These people wipe their ass with their hands. Wonder if he has a frigging IED stuffed up his black ass ready to send me to Davey Jones! How did they get into the country ? Wogs probably swam across the fucking channel. Some nasty white trash wants to touch me ? God knows where they had their hands. Probably jerked off before coming here. They all look like scum ! The sooner this fucking event is over and I can get to the Polo back at the castle the better. WTF, I see that Chink there but canthe squinty eyed little bastard see me. Fucker has buck teeth. This job is no joke ! Got to check my Arabian stallions. Must remember to have tea with Baron Rothchild. Fuck this trash I have to visit with. This shit is boring. Maybe I’ll stop at Andrew’s Country House and get some head from a 13 year old !”

    People in the UK are catching their ass ! Many are unable to buy food, are unemployed, unable to pay for heating and gas, ‘hoods are crumbling, machete attacks and beheading is a national sport, crime and illegal immigration is out of sight, and the shit from the rest of the world flocks to the country of the rulers they hate. The once great UK is a teeming slum.

    One would think the Queen would make a statement like this ” I am fed up with the State of this Country. This just cannot go on. I call on the Prime Minister to attain these goals I have set by such and such a date. I will be watching and will raise bloody hell if these issues are not addressed and fixed in a timely manner !”

    Yeah right ! The Queen and Royal Entourage does not give a shit about their subjects. They live well while the people they are supposed to serve suck salt.

    Their sheep like them, adore them, grovel to them, spend money buying flowers for them, shed tears for them and waste our time mourning for them LOL. Shit, we even work and pay taxes that are diverted to them. Perpetual Social Security LOL ! Thats the agenda of the Royal”s slaves and flunkies. The common masses are a bunch of dumb fuckers.

    And the Royal agenda ? Looking our for Number #1 !!

    Folks adore them and they worship us in return and live to serve us. Well, that;s what they say !

    • Agree: GMC
    • Replies: @Liza
  79. Karl1906 says:

    She was the queen of the most murderous empire in the history of mankind (though in decline during most of the 20th century). Even “outclassing” the Romans at warmongering for profit, waging war for conquest and exterminating whole tribes and populations. And clearly the “inspiration” for the US-American empire. Which inherited this status after making sure the British were ruined after the first (and even more after the second) World War. From then on the British Empire became the poodle of the Americans.

    Some may consider Elizabeth II. “not as bad” as Victoria. But the strong moral foundation of this murderous woman was “substituted” by Elizabeth’s stiff upper lip of bravely ignoring country, people and all political questions. Thus she “bravely” kept her mouth shut when whole populations were murdered in the wars under Thatcher, Major, Blair and Brown and onwards – and the British were always complicit in these crimes.

    In recent times the House of Saxon-Coburg-Gotha has especially been “active” in pushing the status quo to the max and preserving their interests by all means possible. The Windsors are the richest family in the UK and very much on top of the establishment. And also financing the World Economic Forum, the symbolic organisation for the establishment of mass extermination and totalitarism.

    In other words, may she rest in peace and good riddance!


  80. @Jud Jackson

    Catholic Sedevacanists will blame either a)foreign entryism into the priesthood or b)point to outside pressure during the Second Vatican Council from any of its older enemies: freemasons, Protestants, communists, and Jews..

    They seem to ignore the whole Cultural Revolution in politics which ruined most of the Western World (it really hit both Catholics and Protestants). The Pope isnt some ultra powerful figure like he used to be.

    Another possibility is that the Jesuits either sincerely or unwillingly wanted these changes.

    The homosexual and pedophile scandals were around before Pope Francis. Even the conservative Benedict and John Paul II had problems. Priests have always had homosexuals going back centuries.

    So you can pick your “faction” of the Church depending on your beliefs. Many Catholics are well meaning people, although genuine believing and practicing Catholics have dropped significantly.

  81. HdC says:
    @RJ Macready

    A Churchill??? You are off your meds, or insane.

    • Thanks: nokangaroos
  82. Her Majesty’s government wishes you to know that all of the United Kingdom is now a morgue.

  83. @Carlton Meyer

    Yes, all wars are banker wars. The Empire was a corporate empire based in Britain, just as the Dutch Empire was a corporate Empire based in Holland and the US Empire is a corporate Empire based in New York. The Monarchy had little to do with the Empire beyond being a figurehead, as post restoration it had no power at all. They reign but do not rule – the (((banks))) rule.

  84. E. Michael Jones is a cuck……just like Thomas Fleming over at Chronicles….They are into Nigerian Negro “American” Worship….And these are the Paleocon “Men”….

    • Agree: HenryB
  85. @Anon

    In medieval terms, a virgin was a young unmarried woman. Jones apparently in thrall to the biblical fairy tale of the impregnation of a young married woman in Galilee, does not consider that to be adultery. Also missing from Jones screed is celibate means unmarried. It has nothing to do with chastity. Priests regularly took advantage of women, but since the confessional could absolve sin – intercourse outside marriage – all was good. Yes, those horrible protestants did terrible things to convert people, unlike Charlemagne or Ferdinand and Isabella.
    By the way, who gave the church those lands in Britain in the first place?

    • Agree: HenryB
    • Replies: @Getaclue
  86. @War for Blair Mountain

    The late Queen of England was an enthusiast for importing African and Pakistani LEGAL Immigrants into England…and E Michael Jones has no problem with this.

    Enoch Powell explained the flaw 60 years ago. All of the “Empire” were British subjects. While they had laws within their own countries defining citizenship, Britain had none. Therefore, all subjects were allowed to be in Britain. What the Queen thought was irrelevant, that was the law – or lack thereof – until the early 70s.

  87. @Notsofast

    Actually when I heard the news of Betty Battenberg’s death, I put on the song “Another One Bites the Dust”

    • LOL: Liza
  88. @Karl1906

    Well you know they had Empires within Asia…within the Muslim World….within the Amerindian World…..And it was all quite nasty:lots of slavery…lots of Genocide…Thank God they didn’t have the technology to expand across the Planet.

    The only relevant question to raise about Queen Elizabeth is this:Was she good for the Anglo Saxon Working Class. And the very obvious answer to this question is emphatically NO.

    E. Michael Jones did not raise this most relevant question because he is a CUCK…who will be on the front cover of Cuck Boy Magazine this October……

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  89. anarchyst says:

    Free Republic

    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?
    August 14th, 2009 | Kevin Roeten

    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?


    It turns out pedophilia is an incorrect term, and Catholics aren’t responsible for most of it.

    Shockingly, AP breaks out of their typical liberal mold and reports Insurance companies shed light on extent of sex abuse in Protestant churches, that sexual abuse of minors has been rampant. But in their statement, they indirectly say members of the Catholic Church are not the majority abusers.

    AP discusses the raw numbers from three companies that insure the majority of protestant churches in America (Church Mutual, Guide One, and Brotherhood Mutual), and typically receive 260 reports/yr of people under 18 being sexually abused. Compare that with ~228 credible accusations/yr against Catholic clerics since 1950 (documented abuse records).

    Together with that information, it is known that the Catholic Church greatly outnumbers any specific Protestant denomination, and the data for Protestant churches is available only for the last seven years. Ever since the first sexual abuse cases had been reported, Catholics have had requirements: 1) police background check done on all volunteers,including priests, 2) a second person be present at all religious functions, and 3) all personnel involved with minors must take routine checks with Protecting God’s Children.

    Without a doubt, sexual abuse of a minor is one of the most despicable crimes and sins that man can perpetrate. But predators seem to thrive in an atmosphere where the base congregation is one of the most trusted organizations that exist.

    Philip Jenkins, in his 1996 book Pedophiles and Priests, [[link edited for length]], looked at the problem objectively and dispassionately. Jenkins (who is not Catholic) found that true pedophilia is extremely rare, and perhaps more common among Protestant clergy, and is even more common among married laymen.

    He found that in most sexual abuse cases (under the age of consent), the behavior is actually a variety of homosexuality. This sexual attraction with very young men that combine the charm of boyishness with sexual maturity is actually called ephebophilia. Pedophilia is really a psychiatric term meaning sexual interest in children below the age of puberty.

    The worst sex crimes against children is in the Jewish communities and protestant churches.
    Tomasi was not reserved with criticism either and citing data published by the daily Christian Science Monitor, which was founded a hundred years ago by the Christian Science Church, said that the Catholic Church cleaned its house, Jutarnji List writes.
    According to their figures the majority of the US child abuse cases happens in the Protestant churches and Jewish communities, says Tomasi.


    A Penn State historian, Philip Jenkins, has done an in depth research of pedophilia and sexual abuse among the clergy and has come up with some rather eye opening facts. It seems that while 1.7 percent of Catholic clergy have been guilty of pedophilia (or sexual abuse particularly of boys), a whopping TEN percent of Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia!

    This is all the more interesting, notes Jenkins, since there has been NO media term Pastor Pedophilia coined at all!

    Jenkins theorizes that the media, proving the point of the necessity of sexual promiscuity, overemphasizes any instance of pedophilia found among the Catholic clergy since it can use this to criticize the entire idea of celibacy. But it is interesting that the NON Celibate Protestant ministers have a MUCH GREATER problem with it than the celibate Catholic priests!

    Protestant pastor pedophilia is not within the frame of our social constructionists as Jenkins calls the media:

    In the 1980s, [Pastor] Leyva had abused perhaps one hundred boys in several Southern states, but few of us ever learned of it. Leyva had the distinction of being a Pentecostal minister and was, therefore, not within the frame of those who were busy constructing reality. The same is true of the three brothers, all Baptist ministers, who were charged with child molestation in the 1990s; the public learned little about this highly unusual series of cases because it was not deemed worthy of dissemination by those fixated on Catholic scandals. [1]

  90. HdC says:

    “…but since the confessional could absolve sin…”
    You missed -deliberately or through ignorance?- the most important part of confession.

    Just before the sinner’s dismissal, the priest admonishes: “Go forth and sin no more”.

    Repeating the same sin over and over again does not meet that admonition, and the forgiveness is null and void.

  91. @Curmudgeon

    Mr. President (Wilson)… Mr. Morgan has made it perfectly clear that his loans of hundreds of millions of dollars to the British won’t be repaid unless you sit up and sign this declaration of war against British economic enemies. The British are on the verge of losing and only you can save them. Someone wilI arrange for newspaper alarms and motives while you sing a chorus of “Onward Christian Soldiers”.


    Smedley D. Butler (War is a Racket)

  92. schrub says:

    Rabbi Stephen Wise, probably the most prominent and influential Jewish religious figure in the USA in the early to mid-twentieth century put it very succinctly when he said that:

    “There are no Jewish-Americans. There are only American Jews” (i.e Jews merely living in America)

    When he made this statement there was no apparent rejection of it whatsoever by the Jewish establishment.

    In the USSR, Jews asked for and were granted “Jewish passports”, not the passports of the countries they were born into or resided in.

    BTW: Jews don’t consider themselves to be “white” either. Don’t believe me? Ask one of them.
    Only a gentile can be labeled derogatorily as being “white”

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  93. Che Guava says:

    Not just figureheads, the Brit and Dutch royal families have immense real-estate holdings beyond their borders.

  94. Rich says:

    Hangings are a proper and fitting as well as environmentally safe way of punishing murderers, child abusers, rapists and serial criminals who feast on the weak and powerless. Why should precious electricity or syringes be wasted on the vicious animals who violate other human beings? A good hangman never leaves the condemned to strangle, but there are cases, maybe the rape and murder of a child, where he deserves to strangle.

    • Replies: @Mac_
  95. anonymous[262] • Disclaimer says:

    EMJ, if you’re reading here, care to elaborate a bit on who these English ‘Lombards’ were? The same Lombards who had invaded Northern Italy, forcing the construction of islands in the Venetian Lagoon, 5 centuries earlier?

  96. @Carlton Meyer

    Yes, talk about turning history on its head. The unnecessary war not only lost them their empire but lost them their place in the world. But ‘at least we’re not speaking German’. Grrrrrr..

  97. The British are morally insane and drowning in their own vomit. Do you…

    A) Throw them a life jacket made of money
    B) Throw them a life jacket made of lead
    C) Jump in the water and drown with them
    D) Throw them a straitjacket

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  98. Che Guava says:
    @Kolya Krassotkin

    ‘pointed at’ is not the correct expression.

    ‘being aggressively poked in the chest’ is closer.

    • Thanks: Kolya Krassotkin
  99. @TGD

    In fact the only major flaw I find in EMJ’s reasoning is his refusal to acknowledge race as a signifier of anything. Notoriously he once said that if an African lived in Poland and spoke Polish then he was Polish.

  100. Che Guava says:
    @Kolya Krassotkin

    being disrectfully and agressively poked in the chest

    is closer to reality.

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  101. CSFurious says:

    England has been controlled by the House of Rothschild since Queen Victoria. That is why the recently deceased queen never made any political statements and led her nation into ruin.

    • Agree: Kali
    • Replies: @HenryB
  102. @RoboMoralFascist 1st

    The British are morally insane and drowning in their own vomit.

    All of Anglosphere is like that. Anglos are like horses. Jews cracked the code of Anglo power.

  103. @War for Blair Mountain

    The English-Speaking working class is mostly made up of conquered Celts the Anglo-Saxons kept as helpers or serfs as they extended their kingdoms westwards, or, much later on, immigrant Celts from Ireland, Scotland, Wales (just look up for the names of most workers’ unions’ organizers) that composed the lower strata of the hirelings of the First Industrial Revolution … not of Anglo-Saxons, not of Vikings, not of Normans (which were not all aristocrats but also the sailors that peopled the Southern coasts while the Vikings settled the more Northern ones). Celts used to have a definitely lower IQ, by one SD, but also more resourcefulness and propensity to invention as soon as they did have the sufficient IQ. The Queen EII was fond of Scotland but definitely as a conquering Judeo-Saxon tribewoman, not as an inhabitant.

  104. saggy says: • Website
    @Carlton Meyer

    Pinning the blame on Churchill as an individual is naive … read Wyndham Lewis’ ‘Left Wings Over Europe, or How to Make a War About Nothing’, written in 1936! Quotes:

    As far as Great Britain is concerned, there is, in 1936, not a shadow of a reason for a war with anybody. It is because that there is no concrete reason that abstract reasons have had to be thought up and trotted out.

    Nationalism may be superseded by the issue between different forms of political structure, between parliamentarism, fascism, and Bolshevism. …. Parliamentarism and Bolshevism seem to feel a remarkable affinity for one another, if for no other reason than that they are both consumed with an equal hatred of fascism.

    No British statesman has ever desired a war with Germany. But they have apparently come to regard themselves as committed to a policy which is violently determined to rid Europe of Hitler. And they are well aware that that cannot be effected without the risk of another world-war. It is not so much ‘fascist dictatorship’ that excites them — for after all they left Mussolini in complete peace for a decade. Neither does Dictatorship , in itself, excite them so much as all that — even accompanied by a permanent Reign of Terror and the massacre of millions of people. For Soviet Russia has been left undisturbed. No, it can only be something about the internal regime of Adolf Hitler that excites in them this implacable mood.

    The Franco-Soviet pact has been ratified and it is highly probable that a Rumano-Soviet pact, on the lines of the military pact between the Soviet and Czechoslovakia, will be signed in the near future. The Austrian Government (which represents a fantastically small fraction of the people of Austria) seems to be moving towards an entente with the Little Entente. So the game of ‘encirclement’ goes on: and all these arrangements — carried on in every case over the heads and usually in contradiction to the wishes of the people — are made possible, and constantly stimulated by British and French gold. The remarks which I have quoted from the Morning Post mean, in plain language, that Great Britain is about to arm the Soviet against Germany. (Marshal Tukachevski stopped behind in England after the funeral of King George to go round the British armament factories to pick his tanks and guns.) There have constantly been rumours of a fifty million pounds British loan to France. That, too, in plain language, is Great Britain arming France against ‘the Hun’

    There is one country where the Englishman is certain of a warm welcome: there is one country whose government never ceases to proffer friendship, and to be accommodating and polite, and that is Germany. Year in and year out, like a love-sick supplicant, Herr Hitler pays his court to the haughty Britannia. Every insult that can be invented even by the resourceful Mr. Churchill is tamely swallowed, every rebuff of Mr. Baldwin’s, every sneer of Mr. Eden, is meekly accepted, by this pertinacious suitor!

  105. Athena says:

    St-John Order, September 3, 2022


    (electronically translated)


    The Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St. John of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta has always enjoyed special protection by the Apostolic See.

    The Roman Pontiffs on numerous occasions – starting with Pope Paschal II, who approved the Order with the Bull Pie postulatio voluntatis, granting it protection and granting it rights and privileges – have intervened to affirm its identity, to maintain its operations, to help overcome crises, and to guarantee the existence and development of the Hospitaller Order, including its sovereign prerogatives in the international sphere.

    According to the Sentence of 24 January 1953, issued by the Court of Cardinals instituted on 10 December 1951 with the chirograph of my predecessor Pope Pius XII, of venerable memory, the “prerogatives inherent to the Order […] as a subject of international law […], which are proper to sovereignty, […] do not constitute in the Order that complex of powers and prerogatives, which is proper to sovereign entities in the full sense of the word”. In fact, the Order is ‘a religious Order, approved by the Holy See […]. It pursues not only the sanctification of its members, but also religious, charitable and welfare purposes’. Moreover, ‘The two qualities of sovereign Order and religious Order […] are intimately connected. The quality of the Institution as a sovereign Order is functional, that is, directed to ensuring the achievement of the Order’s ends and its development in the world’ (Acta Apostolicae Sedis 45 [1953], 765-767).

    Therefore, being a religious Order, it depends, in its various articulations, on the Holy See.

    With paternal solicitude and concern, I have followed the progress of the Order in these years, appreciating the works carried out in various parts of the world, also thanks to the generous contribution of Members and Volunteers, and also noting the need to initiate a profound spiritual, moral and institutional renewal of the entire Order, especially and not only of the Members of the First Class, but also of those of the Second Class.

    To this end, I entrusted my Special Delegate, Cardinal Silvano Maria Tomasi, c.s., with this important work of reform, as well as the revision of the Constitutional Charter and the Melitense Code, and the preparation of the Extraordinary General Chapter. Many steps have been taken, but just as many impediments and difficulties encountered along the way.

    After having listened to and dialogued with various representatives of the Order, the time has come to complete the renewal process begun, in fidelity to the original charism. To safeguard the unity and greater good of the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St John of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta:


    the new Constitutional Charter and the corresponding Melitense Code, approved by me, ordering their immediate entry into force, and


    1. The revocation of the High Offices;

    2. the dissolution of the present Sovereign Council;

    3. the constitution of a provisional Sovereign Council, consisting of the following members

    – H.E. Fra’ Emmanuel Rousseau – Grand Commander

    – H.E. Riccardo Paternò di Montecupo – Grand Chancellor

    – H.E. Fra’ Alessandro de Franciscis – Grand Hospitaller

    – H.E. Fabrizio Colonna – Receiver of the Common Treasure;

    and by:

    – H.E. Fra’ Roberto Viazzo

    – H.E. Fra’ Richard Wolff

    – H.E. Fra’ John Eidinow

    – H.E. Fra’ João Augusto Esquivel Freire de Andrade

    – H.E. Fra’ Mathieu Dupont

    – H.E. Antonio Zanardi Landi

    – H.E. Michael Grace

    – H.E. Francis Joseph McCarthy

    – H.E. Mariano Hugo Windisch-Graetz;

    4. the convocation of the Extraordinary General Chapter for 25 January 2023, the Feast of the Conversion of St Paul, which will be held in accordance with the new Regulations approved by me. The Extraordinary General Chapter will be prepared by my Special Delegate and the Lieutenant Grand Master, assisted by the Provisional Sovereign Council;

    I confirm all the powers attributed in the past to my Special Delegate until the conclusion of the Extraordinary General Chapter, which will be co-chaired by him and the Lieutenant Grand Master.

    This, notwithstanding any rule or provision of law to the contrary, as well as any privilege or custom, even worthy of note, that may be contrary to this decision of mine.

    Lastly, I decree that this Decree shall enter into force this very day and be notified to the whole Order.

    From the Vatican, 3 September 2022

  106. Athena says:

    September 9, 2022 : Charles III replaces Elizabeth II as Sovereign Head of the Order of Saint John

  107. Liza says:

    It looks like people are always blinded by the glitter.

    Yes, children blinded by glitter, not unlike birds who are supposedly fascinated with bits of glass, shiny metal, etc.

  108. RouterAl says:

    I understand that Americans do not do irony and black ones even less so , but does the lady, not realize she is speaking and writing in the language of her oppressors, and has i’m sure a highly paid post at a university , a tradition that goes back to the Greeks, and was an institution nowhere to be found in Africa until the White man introduced them.
    Lets please remember that Africans were to lazy to explore , map or exploit there own continent, and even to day have handed the job over to the Chinese. If you want an insight in to what the first White African explorers found when they arrived there , then if you can find a copy on the internet you should try reading The Negroes in Negroland by Hinton Rowan Helper, it was published in about 1880 and is a compilation of the writings of the White explorers , Livingstone , Burton ,Speke and many others. It does not paint a pretty picture of what they found there.

    Finally Dr Jones , important though the reformation was , the enclosure acts were more in my opinion detrimental to the ordinary British citizen than the reformation , as was the Norman conquest both of which were looting operations that transferred the wealth of the nation in to a few hands , sounds familiar , does the WEF ring a bell.

  109. @Francis Miville

    Those dumb Celts….how did they ever produce someone who could come up with something such as Maxwells Equations……Or the Langlands Program for modern math…..or Navier-Stokes Equation…..The substandard Celt genepool…

  110. @Irish Savant

    That’s because E Michael Jones is a CUCK…..E Michael Jones should wear the black and white outfit of a Old Timey Lesbian Catholic Nun….

    • Replies: @JM
  111. @Irish Savant

    According to E. Michael Jones race is a “category of the mind” with which he probably means race is an illusion.

    A discussion about the reality of race by Mr Jones with Jared Taylor can be found here:

    Video Link

    As prudent as Mr Jones is when it comes to the Jewish Question, so foolish is he when it comes to the question of race.

    • Replies: @Irish Savant
  112. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I think this is explained by EMJ being a captive to Catholic universalism.

    • Replies: @Dutch Boy
  113. @Irish Savant

    In fact the only major flaw I find in EMJ’s reasoning is his refusal to acknowledge race as a signifier of anything. Notoriously he once said that if an African lived in Poland and spoke Polish then he was Polish.

    I’d like to think that now that he is in his mid-seventies (he’s just a bit my junior), Dr. Jones might become less inclined to allow his lifelong predisposition to shock and irritate whatever company he is in get the better of him. About five years ago over at TOO, I referred to Jones as “too reflexively ornery” for his own good. In practice, his orneriness, more often than not, works out to his enjoying being the class clown so damn much that he is prepared to sacrifice whole acres of intellectual and moral real estate for the brief pleasure of mortifying someone who made the mistake of thinking of Jones as a friend and ally.

    Given Jones’s important place in the resistance to the (((Satanic Establishment))), I hope that he will one day come to see that there are things more rewarding than pissing off everyone in the room.

    • Agree: Bubba
    • LOL: Angharad
    • Replies: @Anon
  114. @Anonymous

    You forgot “anti-White racist hate speech criminal”.

    “Woke black anti-White racist hate speech criminal whores like Uju Anya”.

    You’re welcome.

  115. Dutch Boy says:
    @Irish Savant

    Contrary to Dr. Jones, universalism for Catholics does not mean that race is a category of the mind and not objectively real, it means that all humans are in need of the saving grace of Jesus Christ offered through His Holy Catholic Church. That is why the Church is open to all races, ethnic groups, and classes without restriction.

    • Agree: Irish Savant, anarchyst
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  116. USGrant says:

    E M Jones correctly points out the UK and all the other nations in the EU and NATO are vassal states of the Jew controlled USA. But so is the woke Vatican 2 Catholic church. The Spirit of Vatican II was a term derived from the Spirit of 76 popularized by TIME/LIFE publisher Henry Luce. The Catholic church of Pope Francis is a pathetic serf of the American Jewish billionaire oligarchs.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  117. Anonymous[326] • Disclaimer says:

    “BTW: Jews don’t consider themselves to be “white” either. Don’t believe me? Ask one of them.”

    The Jew is white when it suits his purpose but otherwise, he is a negro pure and simple. Ever wondered where the jewfro comes from? It sure don’t come from the European race.

  118. Anon[125] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    He is ornery. The Jewish subject is such that it renders those who constantly gaze at it either depressive or ornery. Fortunately his two latest books have him partly focusing on Divine Providence and beauty and art, and he will gladly discuss these wholesome subjects on his Telegramm channel, live, some Friday afternoons. It is enjoyable.

    He is writing a Holocaust book, God help him.

    • Agree: nognverra
    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  119. Mevashir says:

    Read this book to see that the rot already had set in during the 19th century, when European Jewish bankers constantly bailed out the Vatican.

    • Replies: @Franny4thegranny
  120. Anon[125] • Disclaimer says:

    “ The Cath Church started out by killing tens of thousands of other Christians, ..”

    You mean Nero and Popea were Catholic?

  121. Angharad says:

    Cathokikes are the idiotic mindless drone servants of the Jew, and always have been.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  122. Angharad says:

    Recall that the “witch burnings” which raged through Europe for centuries, began with Cathokikes, and was one of the WORST reigns of terror, and wealth and land theft EVER

  123. Cowboy says:

    Poor Lurch wants his Romanist collectivist State so badly. If wasn’t for those pesky Protestants and their individual liberties he might have been a great torquemada ruling with an iron fist. Don’t worry Lurch, we are definitely moving towards a collectivist State it’s just not going to be your utopian collectivist State. (If the Presbyterian Rebellion aka American Revolution had kept out the Jews and Romanists ours would still be a land of liberty.)

    • Replies: @Angharad
  124. Angharad says:
    @RJ Macready

    Vlad Tepes reborn is what’s really needed.

  125. E Michael Jones looks like an insect who uses bio-mimicry so as to appear humanoid….I would put the Jones insect in the stick-insect bio-mimicry entomological category….

  126. @Anon

    Thanks for your reply and for the information, some of which is news to me. For instance, I didn’t know that he had his own program.

    As for this,

    He is writing a Holocaust book, God help him.

    “God help him” says it all.

    • Replies: @Anon
  127. Hibernian says:

    Moscow was east of the Pale of Settlement and few Jews lived there.

  128. Hibernian says:

    I suspect E. Michael has some German Catholic heritage. I grew up with German Catholics.

    • Replies: @JM
    , @JM
  129. Hibernian says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    He’s a Catholic who doesn’t worship IQ or money.

    • Agree: Getaclue
  130. Anon[125] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    Telegramm, the alternative to Whatsapp, is an app you download on your phone. You then look for channels, I.e., “Julio Ariza” or “RT” (Russian Tv) or Washington Post (Ukraine coverage). You get their “articles”, but it also allows for live chats, a kind of zoom platform, where you can directly interact with the presenter, pose a question, etc. You can also leave comments on the “articles”. There is no advertising. It is an intuitive platform, easy to use, since I’m certainly not techie and manage reasonably well.

    One cannot look at evil 24/7. Even if, like EMJ, you pray the Rosary.

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon
  131. Ace says:

    It was her empire? You make it sound like Elizabeth had the authority to dispatch armies, launch ships, and initiate nuclear strikes.

    I think she should have drawn the line at importation of non-whites and Muslims by the millions but apart from a declaration on that issue how much can a constitutionally neutered monarch do?

    The decision to try to keep the show going is supportable. She was a decent soul and contributed a lot to helping to maintain the legitimacy of the nation. That she had moral and intellectual cretins running the actual government is not her fault.

    And she’s not the first parent to have disappointing offspring. Even they might not have discredited the monarchy had the modern yellow press not been so vicious.

  132. @Angharad

    t.Negro Saxon, 1919 and 1945

    Go bow to your King Charles the Pedophile, head of the “Anglican church”, an institution made solely to satisfy the bestial lust of a serial sexual pervert, also the king of the island monkeys.

  133. JM says:

    I’m still waiting for these strident partisans of Roman Catholicism and historic Ireland (vs England) to do a job on the IRA bigots. After all the latter are great lovers of and advocates for the extension of the rights of all the Globalist determined varieties of Minority sexual perversion but also of Open Borders Third World migration into Ireland, while never reaching out to the Protestants of the North seeking alliance and joint action against these common enemies of all the people of Ireland.

    But I fear I wait in vain. Could it be that they have more in common with the politics of the IRA than they let on, or is it be that they fear for their lives?

    • Troll: Hibernian
    • Replies: @Pro Patria
  134. Ace says:

    A nuanced understanding of the British constitutional scheme. She was responsible for everything but then was responsible for nothing. Except when she wasn’t.

  135. pyrrhus says:

    The Russians may just decide to destroy all the UKR infrastructure–the generals are angry with Putin’s slow approach…

    • Agree: USGrant
  136. Hey, the most sacred race… brought to you by Jewish Power.

    While shit like this happens all around the US, American kids are taught ‘black lives matter’.

    What an empire of lies.

    From sheboons to skyboons. White race’s greatest crime was bringing blacks into modernity and spreading them and their influence all over the world. Whites spread the black plague, and it’s now even in Japan that has jungle fever like the rest.

  137. Anonymous[149] • Disclaimer says:

    The Queen went along with the replacement of the native British people in the UK for 3rd worlders via endless legal and illegal migration watching the UK turn into a crime riden shithole where children get raped and trafficked while the people who complain about the foreigers doing it get arrested for “hate crimes”, and had no problems with her royal family doing business and keeping close personal relations with notorious pedophiles and child traffickers like Epstein and Jimmy Savile, so she can burn in hell.

    The Queen performed the same function our Constitution currently performs for us.

    They both provided the illusion of continuity.

    Their existence gave our enemies plausible deniability as our nations were fundamentally reshaped by outsiders, with outsiders, for outsiders.

    Sure, looking around, Britain no longer resembles the nation it once did. But, the monarchy is in place. Constant, stoic, intractable. Perhaps not much has changed after all?

    Sure, looking around, America has rapidly disintegrated into a third-world hellhole. But, the Constitution is still the law of the land! And politicians still pay lip service to it. We’ll be just fine!

    The people who conquered our nations allowed us to keep just enough of our customs to stave off revolution.

    • Agree: nognverra
  138. JM says:

    E Michael Jones should wear the black and white outfit of a Old Timey Lesbian Catholic Nun

    Hahhahahhahaha! Yes I can picture that in my mind’s eye.

    No wonder that a disproportion of recruits to Feminism in the 60’s and 70’s came from that culture. It was full of the destructive and later unhinged bitches. That and the far more crafty and calculating Jewess’s.

    The Nuns were an extreme version of women of their time, of the “It’s alright about YOU MEN…” generation/s. Their emotions were charged with a mixture of Penis Envy, just plane envy, a yearning for unattainable equality & legitimate grievance, all circumscribed by a core understanding that it was in the main dictated by the truths of nature.

  139. JM says:

    Previously it had supported the Poor.

    With due respect, that’s facile and naive to boot.

    Contrary to latter day Roman Catholic romantics, Feudalism was no hay ride. So the poor were in abundance. Capitalism in its time, with all its horrors and injustices, was a great advance on that system of which the Roman Catholic Church was not only a guardian but also a beneficiary and major ‘owner’ of (1/3 of the lands in the South of Europe were Church ‘owned’).

    • Replies: @E. Michael Jones
  140. Athena says:

    Once upon a time, when Glasgow became a special daughter of Rome…

  141. Cuffy says:

    According to Kitty Kelley, this Queen said of the Great Cheddi Jagan of Guyana, formerly British Guiana: ” First of all, I hate him because he is black and secondly, because he is married to a jew”.(BTW an outstanding American born woman, Janet Rosenberg) .

    Janet and Cheddi gave the British empire royal hell…..
    Jagan was the first marxist elected on a national level in the world in 1950. His govt. was overthrown by British gunboats sent by Churchill(and the beloved queen) in 1953.

  142. JM says:

    One clear objection: “Vlad the Impaler” is a national hero and should be a European hero.

  143. Nor in all probability will that ruler be her son Charles III, who succumbed to sexual temptation in a way that his mother did not.

    Probably “temptation” isn’t as good a word as “revenge”, but I’ve seen gossip that the existence of Prince Andrew is evidence Elizabeth got payback for Phillip’s alleged sleeping around.

    If Tucker Carlson said the British Empire was in any way ‘benign’, I believe he is quite misinformed. My knowledge of the UK Royals could be comfortably be written on one side of a 3/5″ index card, but I have this feeling the Royals just pretend to be “figureheads”. Their extreme wealth is one indication. The overthrow of the Australian government back in the 70s is another.

    Despite being a US citizen, I regret Elizabeth’s passing – partly because she’s been around for as long as I’ve been alive. Elizabeth-the-human-being is dead, and that’s a sad thing.

    But the death of a generic Queen is not worthy of a single tear so far as I’m concerned.

    • Replies: @Ed Case
  144. Mac_ says:

    Would agree but problem is failure to do it ourselves, our real responsibility in natural law real life. Supposed jails or hanging etc haven’t been used on most child assaulters or murderers, con judges scheme to keep them ‘freed’ because people don’t pay attention, and ‘jails’ are more used to stop good people who would disagree with the false systems or their earth and child assault and slavery schemes. The ‘death penalty’ con was only for occasional show to keep ‘jails’ con going. Many were ‘released during bogus covid dictator con, to clear jails to put in more good people. ‘courts’ are not what people assume. People forget monotheism religion and fake money by same cons ‘inquistions’ robbery and torture ‘cherch’, also use queens/king front, and same as fraud govrmnt ‘constitution con. The consititions are fraud. kelo v new london. also see hedges ndaa lawsuit, refused by supreme cons. Never should have allowed any of it. If people killed scum as necessary there wouldn’t be any. Don’t need govmt.

    Otherwise agree koyla Krassotkin inference same photo. And disagree people point at photo of seville and Charles, it means nothing, he does what told including be around scum and take photos. Charles pointed at organic many decades and gmos over a decade. I don’t care about other things he says because was force born, can’t quit, where would he go, ignorant people refuse to stop state cons everywhere, so he has no choices. Same can’t be said of cons in ‘govrmt’ who weren’t force born, they choose. The few Ron Pauls are gone, couldn’t do anything though tried. I think they made rand stay otherwise if left would be too obvious govmt is a con. The rest who front bogus ‘state’ are smiley cons including females doing more fake ‘solutions’ act as we’re taken down. Should ignore media, focus where we live. Suggest share few short paragraphs Pale Blue Dot by Carl Sagan, goodreads .com

  145. Athena says:

    How the BRITS destroyed the Gaels in Prince Edward Island, Canada, with the FREE TRADE:

    SAME way as today:

    Drimindown: They made them slaves, eliminated all jobs, created completely absurd laws, trends of any style : ‘There’s doctors killed, There’s lawyers muted, There’s law for dogs, You pray at this, You do not smile, etc.’

    Prince Edward Isle, Adieu: The revolt, some lyrics in old gaelic:

    • Thanks: IreneAthena
  146. @JM

    As an Irish Nationalist I have wondered the same thing, at this point, arguing over land taken nearly 400 years ago, while significant, is nothing like the losing of your country right now. The Irish, north and south, have much more in common with each other than with the interlopers that they are now getting en masse. A couple of years ago, the oldest Irish newspaper in America, the Irish Echo, had a guest editorial-letter by Laura Weinstein, “the Irish Maven”, who claimed that “Ireland was too white”. Lol. There’s a book written by one of hers telling us “When the Irish Became White”. You see, being “white” is the Original Sin, which can only be remedied by making everywhere “non-white”, I.e., non-Christian white. They’ve nearly succeeded in California which is a roadmap for the world.

    • Replies: @Irish Savant
  147. ROEL says:

    “In a world like this we long for a ruler who will free us from this wretched form of bondage. Where is Fortinbras when we need him? ”

    There is no such thing. Keep waiting. The only way is to free yourself through your own discernment and effort. This habit of wailing for a liberator is what the psychos in government take advantage of to keep false hope in the minds of the plebe by means of promises never kept.

  148. HenryB says:
    @Irish Savant

    On his pal, Peter Hellend’s youtube page, Jones confirmed, in reply to my question, that if a black African touched down in Ireland and took up the rosary then he or she would be Irish.

    Jones is also a notorious liar. As long as he has his amen-corner and the confessional he doesn’t give a fuck who calls him out.

    His enormous books are obviously written by a committee. Just as Churchill’s later efforts were.

    He’s yet to explain how an “Irish-German” acquired a Welsh surname.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  149. An excellent article. Thank you.

  150. Sarita says:

    I’m in Medellín, Colombia (yeah, Pablo Escobar, blah blah blah) and we dont care a bit about kingdoms and all the silly fairy tales.
    All we know is they killed Diana (whom we loved very much) and that they killed like a 100 million natives up north.
    God save the Queen, they say.
    Rest in heaven, Diana and Cherokee nation. we say.

  151. @follyofwar

    Yes, he would, in fact, not mention those who shall not be named. He knows the rules as much as any other agitator of the left online with any influence and talks around the subject as a guest on many channels.

  152. @Anonymous

    Charles should refuse the crown and let son William accede to the throne. Charles is old, eccentric and laden with family baggage. William is young, has a stunning wife, a beautiful family and is reasonably normal.

    Plus, Charles would now be free to pursue his dream of being Camilla’s tampon, and it is easier to picture Charles as a tampon than it is as a British monarch.

    • Replies: @Anon
  153. Caltrop says:

    “pacta sunt servanda” as such does not appear in my Collins Gem Latin dictionary. The closest I could get is –

    pacti/o = bargain – agreement – contract

    sumpt/us = expense -cost

    serv/a = maid servant – slave

  154. Ed Case says:
    @Zachary Smith

    The overthrow of the Australian government back in the 70s is another.

    This is Myth-Making on stilts.
    Whitlam wasn’t overthrown, as a matter of fact the Super Rich love Labor Governments because they let them alone to pick the bones of the Country clean.
    And there’s no bigger private landowner in Australia than Queen and her extended family.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  155. Thoughts says:

    I think this attitude is wrong.

    The Queen is the servant of the people.

    Well…the people haven’t been Fighting Very Hard to Stop All these Things Have They?

    I think the attitude ‘Live to Fight Another Day’ is a good one in relation to the Royal Family.

    When WE The PEOPLE get our act together, then the Monarchy can follow.

    [Besides, as the photo above of Rothschild poking Charles’ chest shows…I think ‘Staying Alive’ in the most literal sense was the Queen’s #1 goal]

  156. Icy Blast says:
    @Joe Levantine

    I seem to recall one or two episodes of German resistance.

  157. JM says:

    Sorry. Somehow my responses were messed up. Perhaps I hit a wrong button.

    EMJ has a very Irish Catholic cast of mind. A bit like a 50’s Irish Catholic bigot. That would mean that, in his case, the Irish gene was dominant to the German.

  158. JM says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    E Michael Jones should wear the black and white outfit of a Old Timey Lesbian Catholic Nun

    Yes I can picture that in my mind’s eye.

    No wonder that a disproportion of recruits to Feminism in the 60’s and 70’s came from that culture. It was full of the destructive and later unhinged bitches. That and the far more crafty and calculating Jewess’s.

    The Nuns were an extreme version of women of their time, of the “It’s alright about YOU MEN…” generation/s. Their emotions were charged with a mixture of Penis Envy, just plane envy, a yearning for unattainable equality & legitimate grievance, all circumscribed by a core understanding that it was in the main dictated by the truths of nature.

  159. @GenFranco

    “ Jews and secular gentile historians will help you, as they have documented the “outrageous antisemitism” of the Church (popes, theologians, saints, monarchs) who have done the very thing that you claim the Church has not done.“

    This used to be my argument before reading the highly scholarly and informative book of Michael Hoffman “ The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome”. Hoffman argues that the Catholic Church was a bulwark against Jewish Usury for fifteen centuries but starting from the 16th century the Catholic Church started her slide into the practice of usury as well as into Neo-Platonism under the influence of Pico Della Mirandola while engaging first into hidden usury through the Monte Del Pietas and then engaging with the usurious German Fugger family and the Italian De Medici by allowing them to practice usury from loaning the proceeds from Indulgence Bonds. Plus there was a time that the most toxic Jewish books like the Zohar and the Talmud were banned and burnt by the Church to the point that there were a few hundred copies left until Pope Leo X permitted the printing of the Talmud when thousands upon thousands of copies were distributed courtesy of the printing press. Mr. Hoffman’s theory is that any interest on loans, notwithstanding the rate, is tantamount to usury.

    As for the historic perspective, I challenge any Catholic, including myself, to name a high level Catholic Church official who challenged the fantasy of the Holohoax, except for Bishop Richard Williamson who was excommunicated for daring to put the Jewish narrative under critical analysis.

    “ Post Vatican II, done by the very people have made war (from the inside) upon the Church that stood up to the jews.”

    Hoffman points out the flagrant declarations of Vatican II specifying the most outstanding: Jews being the descendants of Abraham are exempted from the need of salvation by Jesus Christ and absolving the Jews from the deicide even though not one Jewish authority expressed any apology for the deeds of their ancestors. When one notices that more than eighty percent of Jews are descendants of Khazars and not of Abraham, the Vatican II declarations become very tenuous.

    To have a fairer view of Vatican II, E. Michael Jones’ book “ The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit” is a must read for it reveals how the Catholic Church was sandbagged by crafty Jews into a misinterpretation of the covenant of Vatican II to make it sound other than what its Catholic writers intended it to be.

    The Catholic Church is on a downward path with respect to her resistance to Jews and secularism. A sad but true fact.

  160. @Anonymous

    Here is a second video about Charles, this one about his relation with the infamous WEF:

  161. @Curmudgeon

    For all we know Lizzy could have been one of the secret board members of the Bank of England.

  162. @Mevashir

    The rot had set in long before that in middle ages Europe when greedy Jewish goldsmiths started the European usury racket that still goes on today and is it any wonder that ‘Goldman’ Sachs is a leading wall street bank.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  163. The secret board members of the Bank of England are the ultimate decision makers and that is why the membership is a secret because they simply can’t afford the truth coming out about them.

    A picture above may give you an idea of family Rothschild link with the British Royals.

  164. @Notsofast

    But did she dissolve parliament or did the Australian Viceroy do it

    • Replies: @Ed Case
  165. @Truth Vigilante

    Ahh, the Irish.. who bitched, moaned, and complained for literal centuries about Anglo occupation.. then.. when they get their self determination, what did they do? Invite in the third world and started murdering their children.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  166. @Franny4thegranny

    The rot had set in long before that in middle ages Europe when greedy Jewish goldsmiths started the European usury racket

    Quite right. But it wasn’t just the “Goldschmidt”s. Don’t forget all the other “honest” tradesmen”. Like the “Silberschmidt”s. And the “Perlman”s. And the “Diamond”s. And the “Richman”s.

    Anything with big money and easy swindling pinned to it – Jews have always been right there.

    • Replies: @Franny4thegranny
  167. @Hibernian

    The Holy Father and Hierarchy have done a good enough job already.

  168. Pacta sunt servanda – agreements must be kept

    pacta : noun. agreement, contract, covenant, treaty (here as nominative plural = agreements)
    sunt: verb. sum, I am (here present indicative, third person = are)
    servō : verb. To observe, pay heed to, watch, maintain, to keep to (here – servanda – as gerundive participle nom. = to be observed, to be kept)

    Gerundive, the Latin future passive participle functions as the verbal adjective, expresses the fitness or necessity of the action to be performed, and has the same suffix as the gerund.

    Variant presently in the City as the motto: My word is my bond.

    • Replies: @E. Michael Jones
  169. @Caltrop

    I believe it means roughly – or was intended to mean – “the contract must be serviced”. In other words, all that matters is the precise LETTER of the law – and therefore by implication, neither any other material consideration (such as the resultant homelessness or worse of the debtor) nor any form of moral consideration, or private, personal ethical behaviours – as magnificently portrayed by Shakespeare in The Merchant of Venice. Interestingly, the play was in production by 1598, therefore written some time before – more than 60 years before the Jews were re-admitted to England following their expulsion en masse in 1290. And yet… William Shakespeare, supposedly a poor rural farm labourer, with no education and presumably very few family or friends abroad, still knew enough about the financial and contractual reputation of Jews (from Europe, perhaps ? ) to understand very clearly what they were, and how they behaved.

    Quite apart from the huge hint this gives us about the real (non-) identity of Shakespeare, even more significant is the fact that after more than 300 years of NO Jews present in England (or at least certainly not permitted to trade) the memory and perception of their “business” and personal behaviour was still so familiar and ingrained to the English people that “Shakespeare” felt comfortable making a ruthless, vindictive, money-obsessed Jew the centrepiece of a play.

    It’s almost as if Jews were still clearly and commonly understood to be fully, deeply, intensely and inveterately… Jewish. You might say, in fact… positively “Pharisaical.

    On another Sabbath Jesus entered the synagogue and was teaching, and a man was there whose right hand was withered. Looking for a reason to accuse Jesus, the scribes and Pharisees were watching Him closely to see if He would heal on the Sabbath. But Jesus knew their thoughts and said to the man with the withered hand, “Get up and stand among us.” So he got up and stood there. Then Jesus said to them, “I ask you, which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to destroy it?”. And after looking around at all of them, He said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He did so, and it was restored. But the scribes and Pharisees were filled with rage and began to discuss with one another what they might do to Jesus.

    – – Luke 6:6-10 (Berean Study Bible)

  170. HenryB says:

    They are kept in place so politicians (run by alien and financial forces) can exercise the royal prerogative to circumvent the will of parliament and the civil population in general.

  171. polaco says:
    @René Fries

    I saw in a youtube video, a mercenary recounting his Rhodesian Bush War time. They’d stumbled upon a farmhouse where they found white children, two or three – toddlers?- though at least one infant, dead with their limbs cut off and bloody trails from crawling in agony, all over their bedroom floor.

  172. @Caltrop

    “pacta sunt servanda” as such does not appear in my Collins Gem Latin dictionary.

    The translation of the phrase is “Contracts [or deals] must be kept.” That is to say, “Those who make a contract are bound to observe its terms.”

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  173. @Pro Patria

    “When the Irish Became White”.

    The author of that book was so full of shit that he literally died from it! Check it out 🙂

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  174. @Dave Bowman

    Agreed but stone cold ‘certain store of value’ was and still is all about gold and that is why what happened in August 1971 is so important because that was the year that the federal reserve ended ‘the gold standard’ which was basically the beginning of the end of the American dream for the working people there,due to the greedy self serving elite at the top of the pyramid.

    It’s why reasonably well informed governments in countries like Russia have been buying up tons and tons of gold of late because of it’s great store of value certainty,unlike fiat money which in the long term will will come crashing down because it is a fake show,run by fakes and fakes always get found out in the end due to the purity of spirit that ultimately runs the whole show behind the side show of human good and evil.

  175. @jimmyriddle

    The question that ought to be asked is not what her religion or ethnicity is, but who is paying her. Someone, besides the German taxpayer, surely is.

  176. Anon[120] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kolya Krassotkin

    Charles should refuse the crown and let son William accede to the throne……….

    Kolya..Like all wealthy families the royal’s is a dog eat dog world. Theirs is a contact sport with a smile ie I am your family, trust me so I can put it up your arse.

    They care neither about their subjects nor about each other. If Charles were 105 he would not accede the Throne to a younger successor. His “job” is a high end welfare scam where he does fuck all but gets paid. Why give up a good thing to a young whelp ? For a better Britain ? LMAO. Did Lizzy step aside at 95 so Charles could take over ? NOOOOOOOOOOOO !!

    The real power is the PM with Charlie the leashed poodle. Cammie tags along, cleaning the royal stick (if it still functions that is) as required. She knows the way to a mans heart is through his tool. Diana was too shy but Cammie knows that a good bitch gives good head ! LOL.

    So there you have it. Its a family that looks out for number 1 with each member looking out for themselves. God help the British public !

  177. @GenFranco

    The “actual Catholic faith”, like the actual Protestant and Eastern Orthodox faiths, contain kind, practical moral rules and principles that tend to lead to a more peaceful, loving, cooperative, effective, prosperous, orderly society if followed widely (Ten Commandments, Golden Rule / Sermon on the Mount, and much of the time-tested advice and parables in Proverbs etc.) …. immersed in a sea of conclusory idiotic “doctrine”, perversion presented in a positive light (like women having sex with their drunken father knowing that he is their father, explain that away, zealot), irrelevant self-worship and navel-gazing and genealogy of long-dead Jews, and atrocity and cruelty (not war or self-defense but atrocity and cruelty) presented in a positive light.

    But if you’re a zealot who makes excuses for your particular corrupt deviant brand of conclusory idiocy, “this topic is probably a bit tough for you.”

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  178. @Pierre de Craon

    When I wrote the comment to which this one is linked, I had not seen the unlinked reply (no. 175) of commenter Psychotic Break.*

    All I’d add to his excellent breakdown of the expression is this: the implication of its grammatical structure is that the obligation is closed-ended and mutual, the presumption being that without both parties’ uncoerced consent, the agreement is indissoluble.
    *I don’t understand why some people fail to hit Reply when what they are saying indeed serves as a reply. The Reply option is the single most useful attribute of the commenting functionality. Given its presence, it is simply rude to act as if participating readers are somehow obliged to scour a comment thread from top to bottom!

    • Thanks: Psychotic Break
  179. The Brits don’t like it when Americans take the piss on their creepy authoritarian grieving for the lizard woman with the tiara.

    I guess Sophie forgot that Cuck Island held its biggest protest in 10 years for George Floyd?

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  180. anarchyst says:
    @Dutch Boy

    Just because the Catholic Church is open to all races does not mean that Catholic congregations cannot self-segregate.
    The occasional visitor of another race to a Catholic Mass would not be denied the sacraments because of race.

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon
  181. Elric says:

    Interesting article Dr. Jones. I have read before about the influence Jews have had on Britain and it’s monarchy since around the 1600s, which has not always been for the better. However, at least back then the British aristocracy and monarchy had more control over it’s Jews and they did not cause aw much trouble or damage to our civilization as they do today. Unfortunately the monarchy today are figureheads who are powerless to stop the decline of our civilization.

    However there is one part of your article that I took issue with. You disputed Tucker Carlson’s strong, poignant defense of the British Empire, and listed things such as the scalping of French Miqmaq Catholics, the Amritsar Massacre, the brutal suppression of the Mau Mau. These are certainly true. But then you recommended Irish, black and Indian Twitter. Twitter is possibly the biggest mental sewer in human history (I only stay there because there are still some gems) full of raging leftard/shitlib drones who regurgitate all the BS they are taught by the media and academia and believe themselves to be free thinking Aristotles for it. Not really the best place to get fair takes on the British Empire, but particularly the three sections of Twitter you mentioned: some Irish, despite being white, have a delusion that they are honorary POCs due to leftist brainwashing, while blacks and Indians have an ancestral hatred of the British and whites due to their jealousy at not being able to create civilizations as advanced as those of the British and whites (maybe it is also a bit about suffering at the hands of the Brits but they themselves also did the same to other peoples). Thus these groups will exaggerate the bad parts of the British Empire and make up others to denounce British and white people.

    Dr. Jones, I am a Catholic like you, and I am also colorblind to a degree. You may not have regard for the Protestant British Empire, but surely you understand that leftist Jewish attacks on the British Empire don’t just stop with the Brits or Protestants, but are part of the overall anti-white agenda to dispossess whites? Surely you aren’t going to revive dumb inter-Christian Protestant-Catholic squabbles during a time where whites are under siege? You very well know that the Catholic Church is also blamed for “colonialism”, “imperialism” and ruining the countries and lives of the benevolent, noble black and brown bodies. Just one of many examples is the Christian anti-white hysteria and the burning of Catholic and Protestant churches in my country of Canada after the fake news story of the mass indigenous graves was spread.

    Also you don’t create an empire by being nice, you can find violence, bloodshed and atrocities in all empires but Tucker’s point was the British Empire brought the most good. A based conservative intellectual like you should not be giving meat to your opponents and enemies.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
    , @Mary Bennett
  182. @Dumbo

    One of the reasons the Reformation took hold was not that the masses were so sold on Protestant theology, but that the princes (German princes at first) wanted to consolidate power and lessen the political power of both the Pope and the Holy Roman Empire – an entity that lingered on long after its usefulness. When looking on the Reformation, one has to look at the political and socio-economic as well as the theological. Then there is always the Counter-Reformation to look at and study.

  183. @Irish Savant

    “When the Irish Became White”. The author of that book was so full of shit that he literally died from it! Check it out.

    A few marginally related remarks, if I may.

    You are of course referring to the grossly repellent (but happily now dead) Jew Noel Ignatiev, who wrote, inter alia, How the Irish Became White. There is a certain peace that descends upon one with the realization that Ignatiev died from a condition brought on by his large intestine’s refusal to tolerate any longer the poison that Ignatiev’s mind and mouth produced.

    Before reading the comment by Pro Patria, I had never heard of Laura Weinstein—evidently yet another Jew whose concern for the well-being of all mankind is so great that her conscience compels her to proclaim herself an expert on what ails the Irish. A brief search revealed that she either is or recently was employed as a polluter of young minds teacher at Horace Mann School, a hyperexpensive prep school in the northwest Bronx, a few blocks away from the similarly chic (and identically fully Jew’d) Fieldston School.

    As fate would have it, I suffer from nearly a lifetime’s acquaintance with both schools and their horrid faculties and student bodies, since sixty years ago this week I began my undergraduate studies at what was then a Catholic college that stood roughly a five-minute-walk’s distance from each of these diabolic distortions of an educational institution. Indeed, I was by no means alone in seeing them as exemplars of why what is perversely called anti-Semitism is simply the natural response to the presence on the planet of Jews. For this reason above all, I shall always regard “higher education”—my own anyway—as having served a useful purpose.

    To return to the Irish and their reputed ills, one might have thought that it should be pretty clear to everyone that what Ignatiev and Weinstein dislike most about the Irish derives directly from the homicidal Jewish hatred of the Cross of Christ and of all those who follow it. Yet this hatred runs so deep among Jews generally that neither of them plainly cared a whit that, at the time of the publication of Ignatiev’s book, the Jews had already succeeded in doing in a mere two generations what the English failed to do in six centuries: get the Irish to apostatize, virtually en masse.

    Yet as every reader of this thread or almost every other Unz Review thread knows, something else that the Jews have accomplished is making venomous hatred of Christianity—pre-Vatican II (i.e., pre-sellout) Catholicism especially but by no means exclusively—as popular and as (((American))) as movies featuring full-frontal nudity. People whose spelling and vocabulary reveal them to be akin to those that need to use both hands to find their arse consider themselves intellectually and morally empowered—indeed almost required—to denounce Christians and Christianity as contemptibly stupid or Judaically co-opted or both. Unsurprisingly, they are quite blind to the fact that they would have blended in perfectly with the bloodthirsty mob in Pilate’s courtyard.

    Not that I’m complaining, mind you. I was warned at Confirmation.

    • Replies: @Irish Savant
    , @JM
  184. Purple says:

    God will destroy all the wicked and this world will go through a severe Chastisement for the sins and crimes that its inhabitants committed. Kings and Queens of this wicked world have abused their power and surpassed the poor, the innocent babies to death over billions and billions… God will make them get drunk on their own blood. The Jews, the Rothschild, the Israelis, the Zionists, Globalists, Modernists, Satanists, Atheists, Abortionists, and all criminals will die and see their reward in Hell. Too bad, they don’t think there is Hell, they will soon find out.

  185. Ed Case says:

    His old mate John Kerr gave him the arse.

    Now Kerr was a former schoolmate and later legal colleague of Whitlam, so perhaps the rumour that Whitlam prevailed on Kerr to sack him hoping that public outrage would see a Labor return to power at the new Election has legs after all?

    It wouldna been the first dodgy thing Whitlam did that later went awry.

  186. @Elric

    When so called Christian countries like the monkey islands and the JewSA started talking about “rules of Nature” and Darwinism, God rejected them.

    The Chinese and the Russians will lead the scourge sent by God to exterminate the heretical, evil negro-saxon race. Cucker Carlson is a soulless kike lover, just like the rest of the so called “right wing”.

    Tic toc. No amount of bitching will reverse this. Only true repentance. And considering how the negro-saxon “right wing” doesnt truly believe in God but want to use Christianity as a tool, regardless of faith, it is safe to say no grace will be bestowed upon these Sub-Human kike serving countries of the West.

    Payback for centuries of collaborating with the kikes. Tic toc, island monkeys, tic toc.

    • Replies: @Elric
  187. @saggy

    Saggy, check out my website for good information on Jewish Messianism q.v. the article “The Tower of Babel” which you need to add to your site. Also the paper “The Many Forms of Genocide: Hard and Soft”.

  188. @Pierre de Craon

    All true. These demons seem to be winning on every front. There are only two sources of consolation: Divine intervention (I’m serious) or Jewish history, which shows them invariably overreaching and inducing a severe reaction from their victims.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  189. Notsofast says:
    @Ed Case

    please explain how liz isn’t part of the “super rich” and how she aquired her huge tracks of land. just looking out for the good of the little people, that’s our dear old liz(ard).

  190. Notsofast says:

    i wonder if now, that charles is in charge, if he looks in the mirror and says “i am the lizard king, i can do anything.”?

    • Replies: @GMC
  191. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:

    Dr. Jones, I’ve enjoyed your stuff for years, but you are often fond to spin the quote:

    “No one has the right to hurt the Jew, and the Jew has no right to subvert your culture.”

    You never say what comes next.

    It’s important, because one thing we know for sure, the Jew WILL subvert your culture.

    In fact, they won’t just subvert your culture, they’ll KILL you and everyone you love.

    What’s your solution- keep prayin’ to JewGod Jesus?

    Seems like that’s been tried the past 2,000 years, extensively – got anything else?

    • Agree: Henryb
  192. @Bragadocious

    I guess Sophie forgot that Cuck Island held its biggest protest in 10 years for George Floyd?

    No, she didn’t forget that at all. But as the beautiful, outspoken and high-IQ genius White woman Sophie Corcoran – now busy carving out an international multi-media career for herself whilst still a university student – would be the first to point out to you, she is a proud and loyal British citizen, and not a brain-dead shitlib nigger-loving retard tool of international Jewry like them.

    Or like you, asshole.

    • LOL: Bragadocious
  193. @Irish Savant

    Amen, especially with respect to the two sources of consolation you name. I am reminded that St. Anthony of Padua said that we must ask for miracles.*
    *Presumably he foresaw (((Wokeness and the Biden administration))).

  194. Getaclue says:

    Tell Her all about that you utter ignorant fool-my MD friend’s MD Partner grew up in Egypt and was one of a million or so who saw Her…there are none so blind as won’t see:

    • Replies: @Henryb
  195. Caltrop says:

    Is this how it is meant to read?

    “Government of the people (the Elites), by the people (the politicians), for the people (the commoners)”

  196. @TGD

    You wrote:

    Sir Evelyn [de Rothschild] bears a very close resemblance to the late US Congressman and Hungarian Jew Tom Lantos.

    Well, let’s look at that misshapen head of ol’ Evelyn again:

    And compare it to a much closer likeness:

    • Replies: @TGD
  197. Getaclue says:

    Doesn’t matter the “source” – it happened and is a historical fact. The fact different cultures want to portray Her in art as being of their culture some how takes away from that?

    There are many sources, including the Egyptian Government that investigated Her appearance and based on the clear evidence stated it had happened- there were a number of documented miracles also….She also appeared at Loudes and Fatima among other places historically-but for doubters She allowed Her photograph to be taken this time in Egypt-fools of course still doubt and ridicule:

  198. FKA Max says: • Website

    “Vulgaris, Hic, Oculus caligabit, diffidetque plurimum”


    The Incalculable Genius of John Dee
    This a presentation that I gave to the Shakespeare Authorship Roundtable at the end of last year. Some of its content will be familiar to regular viewers of this channel. It is a salute to the incredible achievement of John Dee in preserving the truth about William of Shakespeare.

  199. JM says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    You reckon it was mainly ‘Christianity’? I don’t. They already had that in their pocket – as you said – after the climb-downs of Vatican II*.

    I once thought that Irish Nationalism would be a sure barrier to the plans in store for Western nations. I lived through (and supported) the Irish nationalist struggles from the 1960’s. I saw how the leftism of Irish nationalism was mainly of the nationalist (anti-cosmopolitan) kind and that they were willing to use arms to attain their goals. The Greek Communists had similar political attributes and decades ago when I started to see that agendas were in operation (in their nascent form) that didn’t fit any Leftist understanding, I went to Greece and made contact with them in order that I could learn their view. To cut a long story short: it turned out to be as stale and doctrinaire as ever on the way to essentially becoming an adjunct to the Globalist Plan**.

    But my point is that I think it was nationalism that the Jewish footsoldiers of Finance Capital feared most, not Christianity for the same reason I made my assessment. That’s why they focused their attack where they thought it would hurt most – on race.

    Aside from the Pre-Vatican Catholic Church, Christianity in all its forms has a distinct cosmopolitan quality to it, one which can be readily ideologically manipulated into a Globalist adjunct. That’s aside from the material interests these hugely wealthy organisations have in not resisting the dominant Financial forces of the Globalist phalanx.In this latter sense, British Royalty, The Churches, The Jews and Finance Capital all inter-penetrate both materially and ideologically, the latter, when it comes to the crunch, being subordinate to the Earthly reality of the former.

    *In the East, with the breakup of Communism, control over the Church, was lost (the secret police under Communism had considerable control of the Orthodox Priesthood)..
    **Like almost all of the Western ‘Marxists’.

  200. Hibernian says:

    He’s yet to explain how an “Irish-German” acquired a Welsh surname.

    Jones is an Anglo-Saxon surname common among Welsh people. It’s a patronymic meaning, obviously, “Son of John.” That someone could be Irish/Welsh/German, and Catholic, is no surprise in the small town Midwest, Chicago, or Philadelphia. Even in Boston you have the Wahlburgs who are almost full blooded irish with a Swedisg patrilineal ancestor. And the Swedes are almost all Protestant.

    • Replies: @HenryB
    , @E. Michael Jones
  201. Hibernian says:

    (like women having sex with their drunken father knowing that he is their father, explain that away, zealot)

    That was early in the Old Testament.

  202. Elric says:

    Jews have been in other European countries too. Poland actually invited them in during the Middle Ages, and the Russian Empire actually had the largest Jewish community at one point. Germany also had many Jews before. Do they also deserve to be exterminated for that?

    The Chinese and Russians are anti-white, look at their media and they will push critical race theory anti-white BS. Russia also panders to and boosts white right wingers but they only do it to brainwash both sides and to benefit Russia. They are schizophrenic and probably not trustworthy. Tucker is not totally red pilled and there are some topics he can’t touch being on Murdoch’s network but he has criticized Israel and the ADL for their hypocrisy regarding Israeli and American immigration policies and the ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt actually got so upset he demanded Tucker be fired for it. Tucker is not popular among Jewry. I should probably watch him more often, he is one of the best journalists in the world.

    Yes, unfortunately the right doesn’t touch the JQ enough and is still subservient to Israel. Sooner or later they are going to have to realize that the Pharisee Cabal is what is behind the destruction and deconstruction of the West, or else they will never win.

    But why are you advocating the destruction of the Anglo race? You sound insane. Once again, the cabal is not going to stop at the Anglo race, the entire white race must pay the penalty as far as they are concerned. All these agendas are happening in all European nations. Even if it was just the Anglos it wouldn’t be right, Anglos have been a core group in spreading Western civilization. Even blacks don’t deserve extermination, I know there are extremists like BLM but I reject generalization and collective punishment as a Catholic, even of the Jews. This nihilistic attitude isn’t going to get us anywhere.

    • Replies: @JR Foley
  203. HenryB says:

    I can assure you there aren’t many catholics in Wales. Especially called ‘Jones’. It seems Dr. Jones is hiding his British ancestry in a ‘category of the mind’ called shame.

    Poor fellow.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  204. @Carroll price

    Converting the natives to Christianity was not the primary reason for the Spanish conquests but the
    Catholic Church did undermine native culture,including the indigenous languages in addition to their spiritual beliefs.As my Mestizo professor of Latin American history was wont to say,”The Spaniards came for the gold and silver and stayed for the women and the land.”

    In a recent study it was found that 93% of the Mexican population is Mestizo,4% is European and
    3% is Black.Within the Mestizo group about 64% of the males had European Y-DNA,32% Native
    American and 4% Black.These numbers differ significantly from the mitochondrial DNA of the Mestizos which is 95% Native American.Both sexes inherit their mitochondrial DNA only from their mother.

    A similar but less dominant European distribution is found in the United States where over 50% of African American and Native American men have Western European Y-DNA but both populations have less than 5% mitochondrial DNA derived from Europe

  205. @JM

    More Whig history. Read William Cobbett’s History of the Reformation in England and Ireland for the true story of how the Church served the poor before the looting operation known as the Reformation.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    , @JM
  206. @Hibernian

    My grandfather Eugene P. Jones was born in Mallow outside of Cork. My greatgrandfather Isaac Jones emigrated from Wales to Ireland.

    • Replies: @Henryb
  207. @Psychotic Break

    In this context it means that usurious contracts must be honored.

  208. Henryb says:
    @E. Michael Jones

    So you’re as Irish as the “Edge” from U2. He was born in England to Welsh parents who due to his father’s employment was “transferred” to Ireland.

    What’s wrong with you people? Celebrate your ‘Britishness’!

    That’s free advice from a genuine Irishman here in the UK…lol

  209. @Elric

    “while blacks and Indians have an ancestral hatred of the British and whites due to their jealousy at not being able to create civilizations as advanced as those of the British and whites”

    I might be a clueless American WASP, but even I know that India has been home to advanced civilization for at least the last 3000 years.

    • Replies: @Henryb
  210. @E. Michael Jones

    “…for the true story of how the Church served the poor before the looting operation known as the Reformation…”

    Wouldn’t the Church better “serve the poor” by donating the land it possessed to the farmers who worked on it as serfs?

    You seem to idolize a medieval feudal (“but deeply religious”) society, with as motto ora et labora, where the clergy takes care of the ora part and the peasantry of the labora part.

    BTW, talking about religious crimes, how do you explain (or justify) the genocide and robbery of the Cathars in southern France by your much esteemed Catholic Church?

    And how about the Church’s fraudulent Donatio Constantini ?

    Was a reformation of the Church not justified after all ?

  211. Henryb says:
    @Mary Bennett

    …..and yet 65% of the population still piss and shit in the street?

    The British stopped the Indians throwing healthy living widows on to bonfires.

    How’s that for civilising?

    • Replies: @shadowy_figure
  212. Kali says:
    @Old and Grumpy

    The Windsors are unwittingly keep my Anglo Saxon traditions alive, albeit barely.

    I’m wondering if this is the first time I’ve ever seriously disagreed with you Mr Grumpy (possibly we had a small missunderstanding a while ago, iirc).

    Personally I prefer to think of myself as a Celt, Pict or a Cymru (legitimate Cymru, given that my maternal line is entirely Welsh). Actually many Brits think of ourselves in these terms, and dispise the Anglo-Saxons and their empire.

    A new Camalot and a new Uther are what the Britons and the “aglosphere” really need right now. – Something entirely different and entirely unexpected to inspire the people to freedom.

    A dream…

    With love,

  213. All of my pitiful UK life has been with Elizabeth as monarch. I must admit that I kind of admired her and respected her, if only because she maintained some good degree of certainty and political continuity, even though we all knew it was just a greedy shit-show behind the facade; for example, her two senior sons are both pedophiles or close associates of them.

    Its difficult to hate a woman, right?

    Her life included the pre-WW2 configuration of European states, and all that that meant. Now we are all streaming headlong into a wholly unknown, terrifying New World Order, as if her life and the intervening ‘democratic’ century, never actually mattered at all.

    And with this hideous WEF prick, Charles, I am truly scared. He is an utterly hideous detached subhuman fat-fingered arsehole. I hate him already. I find myself with the non-stop media coverage of the funeral of his mummy that I now utterly despise the British monarchy, and I detest Charles with equal amounts of fear, repugnance and contempt, to a degree which I find quite surprising and shocking.

    I think that a good minority of the British people might well hold a similar sentiment, even though they might never dare, or care to, express it.

    • Thanks: Kali
  214. Kali says:

    In 220 comments on the British Royal Family, not one mention (that I saw – having skimmed through quite a few) of Prince Charles (aka “Chuck the turd”) best mate, “Sir” (because he was, of course, “honoured” by the queen) Jimmy Saville: the worlds most prolific paedophile and necrophile.

    Actually, old Lizard-breath “honoured” far too many perverts for it to have been a coincidence.

    All the best,

  215. @Che Guava

    That portrait illustrates perfectly the central lesson from the book of Daniel: “Better than being upon the throne is to be the power behind it.”

  216. Hibernian says:

    Talk about missing the point. I never said their were any Catholics in Wales, although it’s likely that there are at least a few. I referenced the small town Midwest, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Boston. The American melting pot. Dr. Jones ias an American, you know. Also, you might try reading his reply to my post. He answers the question of how an Irish-American can be named Jones.

    • Replies: @Henryb
  217. @Henryb

    The British stopped the Indians throwing healthy living widows on to bonfires.

    It’s not the place of any civilization to impose its values on any other. That was an error.

    We can still believe that the practice of Suti is wrong even wrong spelled with a capital W.

  218. Henryb says:

    “Talk about missing the point.”

    I think you’ve cornered the market in “missing the point.”

    He says he is mixed race “Irish-German.” Perhaps you haven’t heard him say that though he says it all the time. Do you really need me to explain to you why Jones is Welsh and not Irish? Jones says his great-grandfather “emigrated” to Ireland from Wales. I have to tell you that Wales and Ireland were then part of the same country (UK) and moving from Wales to Ireland was no different than moving from Wales to England or to Scotland and therefore his GGF did not become ‘Irish’ but remained a Welshman and a British subject for the rest of his life. His grandfather, we are told, was born near Cork. He didn’t say if his great-grandmother was Welsh, Irish, English or Scottish, but no matter. Whether or not he had any Irish blood from his GGM his grandfather was also born a British subject of Welsh descent.

    This has to be the root of EMJ’s crackpot idea that if an African lands in Ireland and adopts church and culture he or she then becomes Irish. Because on the limited information received, Jones’ only claim to being ‘Irish’ may well be the less than a lifetime his Welsh descended GF spent there before emigrating to America.

    It’s a fact that during the 19th century life in Wales was gruelling hard for most people and unlikely to be improved by moving to an even more impoverished Ireland. Given these circumstances, it’s possible that the move to Ireland was due to employment within the British civil service or some other function tied to the Crown or district municipality. No wonder he doesn’t boast about his British roots!

    I’m afraid Dr. Jones is as Irish as a Welsh rarebit….that’s cheese on toast to you, Yank.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  219. JM says:
    @E. Michael Jones


    I read Cobbett’s book many years’ ago. It is very well written and riveting, with voluminous information one certainly doesn’t find in the Whig historians (like those who wrote our school history books which were truly a distorted, pauper’s broth). In some ways he writes like you and both your contributions are considerable and I think, of lasting value.

    I am sure that much, even most, of what he documents is true. However, this doesn’t lead me to defend Catholic dominated Feudalism (including its administrative and ecclesiastical infrastructures) except as being the best system for its times. It had many merits, but lacked the dynamic qualities of Capitalism as a System, vs as a form of production at least as old as the slave-based societies.

    Apart from the undeniable empirical evidence for the productive virtues of Capitalism, the inspiration for my comment was that, with all its truths, Cobbett’s lament is essentially ‘ahistoric’, meaning that it vainly tries to use these lamentations and well documented injustices to discredit the broad historical inevitability of the replacement of an earlier system with one which, notwithstanding all the violence and injustices associated with its birth and continuing existence, delivered the goods for broader and broader layers of humanity in far greater abundance, in fact in some instances to the point of over-abundance, even obscenity.

    The problem with Capitalism is that its earlier competitive character was replaced by the increasingly monopolised forms dominated by Finance Capital which, because of history has a definite ethnic character. All the ills imposed on Western nations are traceable and indeed mirror the hyper-dominance of parasitic, unstable, Finance Capital, the most cosmopolitan and amoral form of Capital. It will not tolerate any opposition or any stability arising independently of its own revolutionary requirements. A few decades ago it delivered humanity an ostensibly permanent peace under its Open Borders/Free Trade diktats but these have, almost overnight, turned into their opposites with ‘resource diplomacy’, autarchy and ultimately the grave risk of multi-theatre war on the immediate horizon. Sadly, however, it’s a tiger that has to be ridden till all that is worthy of preservation in it can be shaped into something fit for a truly human society. Given the mess we’re in today, I’d reckon that the growing pains in creating any such new society will be at least as painful as those that gave rise to any of the earlier societal forms.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  220. Quote…

    “Henry Makow responded by calling Carlson a “blue blood” who had “more in common with Anderson Cooper” because both men are involved in policing the oligarchic narrative. Makow identifies Carlson with the “false opposition” whose job is to “steer the narrative away from the central banking cartel and its Communist Jewish agenda”

    I agree with Henry Makow!

  221. hillaire says:

    One can but chuckle at the suicidal bent of the Septic lsles…its fading subjects.. its ‘jew’ owners and it’s dubious and prattish new ‘king’ who used to be (and quite publicly) ‘Great Friends’ with the BBC sociopath and record breaking TV pedophile Sir Jimmy Savile…

    and whose brother is unable to sweat because of his ahem..war service…unless of course he is being questioned about his relationships with teenage whores… and Jeff Epshteen who pimped ’em out to him … which makes him perspire…

    The Jeff Epshteen photographed at the queens log cabin at Balmoral. (with Gizzy)…. ( with HM in attendance and thus ‘approved’)..

    Dear dear…

  222. GMC says:

    He went from a behind the scenes mover nd shaker to the King – now go read Matthew Ehret’s article Can the Brits break from Feudalism or will the King….. it’s on Veterans Today – 3 days ago. You will be surprised.

  223. TGD says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    Looks like the slaves used by the inhabitants of the planet Metaluna to do their dirty work from the movie “This Island Earth.”

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  224. Hibernian says:

    He has a great grandmother along with the great grandfather. D’ ya think the transplanted Welshman might have married a local Irish lassie? Try paying attention, and try thinking for once. The three “Js” in my (American) Catholic parochial elementary school were Johnson, Jones, and Jordan. I wasn’t Jones, but I was well acquainted with him. Your obsession with someone named Jones being Catholic and partly of Irish heritage, especially when he’s American, is laughable.

  225. Henryb says:

    “He has a great grandmother along with the great grandfather. D’ ya think the transplanted Welshman might have married a local Irish lassie? Try paying attention, and try thinking for once.”

    You must’ve missed this…

    He didn’t say if his great-grandmother was Welsh, Irish, English or Scottish, but no matter. Whether or not he had any Irish blood from his GGM his grandfather was also born a British subject of Welsh descent

    .Er…”Try paying attention, and try thinking for once.”….Moron!

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  226. anarchyst says:

    In the days of the “robber barons”, the united States of America was largely successful due to the Protestant (lack of) ethics, most builders of industry raking in millions in profits while ignoring the basic needs of those who made their success possible by their hard work. It was common to see these Protestant “captains of industry” do their damnedest to pay their employees as little as possible while raking in massive profits benefiting only themselves.
    Protestants still consider anyone who cannot be successful in business as suffering from a moral failing of their own doing, not due to outside circumstances.
    Catholic doctrine requires business owners to pay their workers fairly–not below subsistence wages. It is a sin not to do so. There is no comparable demand in Protestantism.
    These Protestant “captains of industry” attempted to redeem themselves by establishing “foundations” (which guarded their wealth, making it tax exempt) and indirectly countering their own Protestant belief that “good works” were not necessary for salvation.
    They always pleaded poverty to their employees while living grand lives themselves.
    This contributed to the rise of labor unions, which at first, were brutally suppressed.
    There were exceptions, such as Henry Ford, who almost single-handedly created the middle class by paying his employees well above “market wages” of the day. His \$5.00 per day wage was not entirely altruistic as it was also instituted to stem “turnover” as assembly line work was monotonous, but his writings have stated that one of his objectives was to make it possible for workers to “enjoy the fruits of their labor”.
    The Protestant Reformation resulted in the legalization of usury, the establishment of the debt based financial system and central banks which has enabled the usurers to accumulate so much wealth and power that they can impose their NWO.
    The Reformation resulted in cartel capitalism, communism, socialism, fascism, two world wars which resulted in the decimation of the European peoples by the jews and WASPS acting as muscle for the bankers, and various genocides and the dystopian difficulties that are a part of modern civilization.

    • Replies: @Ed Case
    , @JM
  227. @TGD

    Your alien was pretty close to the mark.

    However, the photo I posted was of an alien from the film ‘Mars Attacks’ :

  228. Ed Case says:

    Yeah, yeah, …
    This is what it comes down to:
    Catholics Employers won’t hire Protestants, but they cried and moaned for years about Protestant Employers doing similar.
    Eventually the Protestant employers gave in and started hiring Catholics.
    The Catholics got their mates a job there too, eventually they took the concern over and they still didn’t hire Protestants.
    Similar to what the Moslems do, except that the Moslems aren’t mealy mouthed about it.

    • Replies: @JM
  229. JM says:

    This is so full of fantasy that I am led to the conclusion that truth means nothing to you because you close your eyes to vast evidence available that refutes all substantive points made by you. You are therefore a Roman Catholic Cultist. A bit like a Western Communist in the 1930’s, or at any time after that. You were given a line and the facts meant nothing. That is perhaps why there were so many Irish Catholics who were Stalinists/Communists.

    Look at the role of Catholic capitalists in a Catholic country like Italy or any Latin American country. Once – in the former – there were many mass Socialist Parties (the Communists used to get a third of the popular vote and a far greater proportion of the industrial (serious) working class vote) and militant, revolutionary trade unions – all for what? Because what you say about Catholic capitalists is pure bullshit. You’ll say that these capitalists whose employment policies that inspired these mass movements weren’t real Catholics. With that, your argument falls apart…because the same would apply to Protestants. In fact, what you say about Protestantism is so sweeping that it couldn’t be true. Protestant behaviour is constrained and inspired by biblical teachings. Like, say, “Thou Shalt Not Steal”…meaning, for example, the time a worker puts into the business. And there are many more biblical constraints/sources of behavioural inspiration.

    It is far more correct to say that all Christian employers have these constraints, but that they all act under other constraints, namely Profit Maximization, the laws of the particular market in which they operate and so on. I would say that the behaviour of capitalists of all hues is governed far more by these considerations than by their religion.

    But even if there was exploitation and there most certainly was, no worker will work for any length of time at below ‘subsistence level’ (as you call it). If you were to read an introductory pamphlet by Marx on this you would be left in no doubt as to his opinion of your point. Nor did he see Roman Catholic employers as possessing any particular virtues. That’s not how the world works. And as I say above, this business of exploitation is at the heart of capitalism which by some paradox which you should explore, delivered far more material comforts, health and material happiness to millions than any previous social system. I suggest that you should explore why this was the case and why the horde of immigrants from the arse end of Europe – like Ireland, Central and Southern Europe just kept on coming to America, Robber Barons and all.

    At a certain point, family owned business, having sought finance to expand, started to be owned by the bankers. This process has almost run its full course today and it’s this hard material fact that is behind the NWO Agendas, so beloved and propagated by liberals and the “Far Left”. But always remember that this industry was “bought” by the banks by the issuance of “money” out of nothing, requiring the leveraging of nothing in particular these days, such are the laws they’ve had made for them. And when they “fail” because of their parasitic profligacy, the tens of Billions will be forthcoming from whatever US government to bail them out…because they are “too big to fail”…meaning that their failure will drag the whole nation down with them. This is just one of the perfect illustrations of the hyper-dominance, hegemony within Capitalism of Finance Capital. There are many others… This is the new Capitalism, now dragging down Western nations with it..

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  230. JM says:
    @Ed Case

    Catholics Employers won’t hire Protestants, but they cried and moaned for years about Protestant Employers doing similar.

    So the real motivation behind the cries and moans when Irish Catholics weren’t on top was thus simply envy, nothing else.

    Those days still linger and the Irish Catholics want to keep it all alive up to the point of the total demise of everything. That’s why the Irish nationalists, lovers and propagators of all the NWO perversions want to fight the past battles of the Reformation, rather than reach out to the Irish Protestants to jointly fight the NWO. ‘Micky Drippins’ describes such people well enough.

    • Thanks: Ed Case
  231. anarchyst says:

    Looks like I ruffled some Protestant feathers. I don’t care.
    Marx was full of sh!t.
    There was massive exploitation in the “robber baron” days. You are wrong in your assertion that workers will not work for less than subsistence wages. Millions of workers did just that as there was no other choice. Crony capitalism was alive and well, even then.
    Robber barons colluded with each other to keep wages as low as possible, ethics and decency be damned. Despite making millions for themselves, (((they))) always pleaded “poverty” as an excuse to cut wages.
    When the only job one could get was one that would at least cover some of your expenses, one would take it. Working two jobs, or long hours, even on Saturdays and Sundays was not unheard of.
    The “robber barons” did not give a sh!t about their workers. Failure to be successful was considered a negative personal trait, put on the individual himself, rather than the circumstances he was forced to work under.
    The “company town and store”was another successful gambit used to “insure a stable (captive) workforce”. Prices of goods and even rent was excessive in company-owned towns on purpose and was akin to wage slavery, as it was almost impossible for the average worker to “keep up” with the cost of living. “Credit” and the threat of lawsuits if one attempted to leave was enough to keep those who were in such situations from removing themselves from their condition.
    Henry Ford broke the “robber baron” mold with his \$5 per day wage and 8 hour workday and 40 hour workweek. Wall Street banksters howled that Ford “would destroy capitalism” (as (((they))) knew it) with his desire that workers should be able to enjoy the fruits of their labor.
    Pre-WW2 Germany’s greatest “sin” (according to the banksters) was the “monetization of labor”–giving labor true value. Even today’s business schools teach students that labor belongs on the liabilities side of the ledger sheet, not considered to be an asset that helps the company grow. This is why “world jewry” declared “war” on Germany in 1933 (yes, 1933). It was the threat to the (((banks))) that had to be stopped.
    Labor DOES have value, not some talmudic gnome sitting on a pile of gold.
    I stand by my statements.
    As to Catholicism, true Catholicism has not existed since the Protestant and jewish “coup” with the Vatican II Ecumenical Council. Fortunately pre-Vatican II Catholics still exist and are increasing in numbers.
    I stand by my statements.

    • Replies: @soll
  232. @War for Blair Mountain

    you should get your eyes checked for some glasses, yiddler. emj is a 6 ft old chad that would still squash a pussy sisterfucker like you, like a bug.

  233. JR Foley says:

    “The British Empire was not perfect,” Carlson admitted, “but it was far more humane than any other ever. It was an impressive place run by impressive people. We will see many empires going forward, but we will never see one so benign.[1] Ever the Whig historian, Carlson went on to claim that “the British Empire spread Protestant Christianity to the entire world,” unaware that the Raj deliberately suppressed the promotion of Christianity in India because it threatened the servile attitude imposed by the caste system.

    Tucker Carlson has the historical knowledge of a nit. He is a sensationalist social gadfly who is paid to make up fiction and pass it off as truth.

    • Replies: @Elric
  234. Hibernian says:

    “He didn’t say” didn’t mean she wasn’t, and I didn’t say she was, just that it’s a strong possibility.

    • Replies: @HenryB
  235. JR Foley says:

    Any Relation to Dan Tucker of old ???

    Now Old Dan Tucker was a fine old man
    Washed his face in a frying pan
    Combed his hair with a wagon wheel
    And died with a toothache in his heel

    Get out the way, Old Dan Tucker
    You’re too late to get your supper
    Get out the way, Old Dan Tucker
    You’re too late to get your supper

    Now Old Dan Tucker come to town
    Riding a billy goat, leading a hound
    The hound dog barked and billy goat jumped
    And landed old Tucker on a stump

    Get out the way, Old Dan Tucker
    You’re too late to get your supper
    Get out the way, Old Dan Tucker
    You’re too late to get your supper

  236. HenryB says:

    And I considered it and dealt with it. It’s also a “strong possibility” that he has no Irish blood at all. Not a drop!

  237. Elric says:
    @JR Foley

    No, you have the historical knowledge of a knit. You believe the anti-white Jewish CRT propaganda that forms the ideological zeitgeist of your civilization today and is rooted in omissions and lies. I’ll bet if he said that the British Empire was evil and whites sould feel ashamed of it you lefties would be praising his deep historical knowledge.

  238. At the moment I am reading “Reflections on History” (1905) by Jacob Burckhardt A wise man with mature thoughts in elevated language. It is a pleasure to read what he has to say. No one talks like that anymore these days. And that, although (or precisely because?) he is a recognizable universalist who vehemently rejects any provincial narrow-mindedness. At that time, one could still afford such an ornamental “cosmopolitanism”. An excerpt:


    “Intentions, however, are particularly prone to make their appearance in the guise of patriotism, so that true knowledge finds its chief rival in our preoccupation with the history of our own country.

    There are certainly things in which the history of a man’s own country will always take precedence, and it is our bounden duty to occupy ourselves with it.

    Yet it should always be balanced by some other great line of study, if only because it is so intimately interwoven with our desires and fears, and because the bias it imparts to our mind is always towards intentions and away from knowledge. Its greater intelligibility is merely apparent, and arises in part from an optical illusion, namely our own much livelier readiness to understand, which may go hand in hand with great blindness.

    Our imagined patriotism is often mere pride towards other peoples, and just for that reason lies outside of the path of truth. Even worse, it may be no more than a kind of partisanship within our own national circle; indeed, it often consists simply in causing pain to others. History of that kind is journalism.

    Vehement proclamations of metaphysical notions, vehement definitions of good and right, condemning everything outside their limits as high treason, may subsist side by side with the most platitudinous round of life and money-making. Beyond the blind praise of our own country, another and more onerous duty is incumbent upon us as citizens, namely to educate ourselves to be comprehending human beings, for whom truth and the kinship with things of the spirit is the supreme good, and who can elicit our true duty as citizens from that knowledge, even if it were not innate in us.

    In the realm of thought, it is supremely just and right that all frontiers should be swept away. There is too little of high spiritual value strewn over the earth for any epoch to say: we are utterly self-sufficient; or even: we prefer our own. That is not even the case with the products of industry, where, given equal quality, and due account being taken of customs dues and freight charges, people simply take the cheaper, or, if the price is the same, the better. In the realm of mind we must simply strive for the higher, the highest we can attain.

    The truest study of our national history will be that which considers our own country in parallels aqd in relatfon to world history and its laws, as a part of a great whole, illurnined by the same heavenly bodies as have shone upon other times and other peoples, threatened with the same pitfalls and one day to be engulfed in the same eternal night and perpetuated in the same great universal tradition.

    Ultimately, our pursuit of true knowledge will make it necessary for us to eliminate the notions offortune and misfortune in history. The reasons for this must be reserved for the last chapter. Our immediate task is to deal with the peculiar qualifications of our time for the study of history, which compensate these defects and dangers.”

    “Even Friedrich Nietzsche, who had come to Basel from Leipzig as Germany’s youngest university professor and was already considered a philological authority at the age of twenty-four, praised Burckhardt as ‘our great, greatest teacher’. Nietzsche often tried to engage in conversation with the older colleague and probably followed one of his lectures. Burckhardt, on the other hand, certainly saw the talent of the young Nietzsche, but politely kept him at a distance and probably could do little with his later philosophical works.” (Wikipedia)

    In a letter written to Nietzsche in 1874 Burckhardt has set down his aims as a teacher: “My poor head was never capable, as yours is, of reflecting upon the ultimate reasons, aims and desirabilities of historical science. Yet as a teacher and lecturer I think I may say that I never taught history for the sake of the thing which goes by the high-falutin name of World History, but essentially as a genera] subject. My task was to put peopJe jnto possession of that solid foundation which is indispensable to their further work if it is not to become aimless. I have done what I could to bring them to take personal possession of the past – in any shape or form – and at any rate not to sicken them of it. I wanted them to be capable of plucking the fruits for themselves, nor have I ever had in mind to train scholars or disciples in the narrower sense; all I aimed at was to make every member of my audience feel and know that everyone may and must take independent possession of what appeals to him personally, and that there is joy in so doing. I am well aware that such an aim may be condemned as fostering amateurism, but that does not trouble me overmuch. At my time of life, a man may thank Heaven if he has discovered some line of teaching for the institution to which he belongs.”

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All E. Michael Jones Comments via RSS
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.