The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewE. Michael Jones Archive
Notre Dame and the Jewish Question
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“If you let the Jews in, they take over.”

Rev. Theodore Hesburgh, CSC

On November 3, 2022, the University of Notre Dame hosted a debate between College Democrats and College Republicans which suddenly and unexpectedly turned from contentious to nasty when the question of abortion arose. Blake Ziegler, spokesman for the College Democrats, opened the abortion segment of the debate by saying, “I proudly affirm the women’s right to choose.”[1] “For nearly 50 years,” he continued, “our nation recognized this fundamental right. Dobbs will impose significant burdens on women’s health care,” and “force teenage girls to carry their pregnancies to term. That’s the result of their culture wars rhetoric. Dobbs must be overturned.”[2] At another point, Ziegler characterized the Republican position on abortion as: “Tell that teenager in Texas that even thought she was raped by her uncle and is 12 years old, she still has to carry that baby to term.”[3]

Abortion has been a contentious issue at Notre Dame for almost 60 years. This story began in 1962 when then President Theodore Hesburgh sponsored a series of conferences funded by John D. Rockefeller’s Population Council. Those conferences were a closely guarded secret because their purpose was to overturn the teaching of the Catholic Church as a prelude to striking down this country’s laws prohibiting the sale of contraceptives, which occurred during the spring of 1965, when the Supreme Court handed down Griswold v. Connecticut.

During the summer of 1965, Father Hesburgh arranged a meeting between JDR 3rd and Pope Paul VI during which Rockefeller, flush from his Supreme Court victory, volunteered to write the pope’s birth control encyclical for him. For some reason the pope declined this honor, setting the stage for Humanae Vitae, which set off a revolution in the Catholic Church when it was promulgated in 1968. Hesburgh had a bad habit of ingratiating himself with the rich and famous and then betraying them when the association threatened his career. He did this to Richard Nixon, and this is what Hesburgh did to Pope Paul VI when he sided with the revolutionaries and betrayed the pope who needed his support in the looming war over human sexuality that came to be known as the sexual revolution. Pope Paul VI was infatuated with Hesburgh to the point of giving him his ring and seeing him as a spiritual heir who, as a cardinal in Rome, could assist the pope in battling the forces then threatening the Church, but the feelings were not mutual. Hesburgh callously threw Montini’s ring into a drawer with his cigar cutter knowing that a Catholic with Rockefeller backing was more powerful than any cardinal in Rome. In 1967, in the wake of the Charles Curran tenure crisis at Catholic University and the bishops’ capitulation, Hesburgh stole Notre Dame University from the Catholic Church, knowing that he had the full support of the Vatican and the pope, whom he would betray one year later.

For the next decade, as more and more Catholic women neutered themselves with contraceptives, it seemed that abortion would be the next domino of Catholic doctrine to fall. That is the thesis of Ralph McInerny’s novel The Priest, which portrayed the moral rot spreading through Notre Dame in graphic, albeit fictional, detail. Widespread Catholic acceptance of abortion seemed inevitable, but it never happened. Thus, Hesburgh’s decision to accept the chairmanship of the Rockefeller Foundation on January 14, 1976 unleashed a storm of indignation by prolife activists across the country. Stung by their criticism, Hesburgh responded in ND’s student newspaper The Observer by claiming that his critics were misinformed about the Rockefeller Foundation’s stand on abortion. “The foundation has nothing to do with abortion,”[4]E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi, p. 554.
Hesburgh opined. “In fact, you’ll never find the word ‘abortion’ in the report.” Father Hesburgh concluded his article by opining that his critics should know the facts before they made inflammatory accusations.

In an article published in the same student newspaper on April 20, 1977, the late Professor Charles E. Rice of the Notre Dame Law School proved beyond any shadow of a doubt that the word ‘abortion’ did in fact rear its ugly head in the reports of the Rockefeller Foundation, forcing Rice to conclude that the Rockefeller-funded James Madison Constitutional Law Institute, “which handled the entire appeal for the abortion side in Roe v. Wade,” was “the legal spearhead of the abortion movement” in America. When the National Catholic News Service asked for a clarification after Rice effectively called him a liar, Hesburgh declined further comment.[5]E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi, p. 554-5.

Despite massive Rockefeller funding for front groups like Catholics for Free Choice, the abortion domino never fell, forcing Notre Dame to accept grudgingly the presence of a Notre Dame Right to Life movement on campus. The university then tried to co-opt that movement by having ND President John Jenkins make a token appearance at the National Right to Life March in Washington. The idea that Jenkins was prolife ended when he gave an honorary doctorate to the notoriously pro-abortion Barack Obama, showing that he was even handed or duplicitous, depending on your point of view.


The carefully worked out modus vivendi on abortion at Notre Dame ended when Roe v Wade got overturned and 140 Jewish organizations announced that abortion was “a fundamental Jewish value.” During the run up to Roe, when Jews like Bernard Nathanson and Lawrence Lader were leading the abortion crusade in New York, the word Jew never got mentioned in the New York Times, which had become an aggressive organ of abortion advocacy. The only religious group identified in the abortion wars was the Catholics, specifically Catholic bishops, who were accused of imposing their views on everyone else.

Unaware that the world had changed, Blake Ziegler took this tack in his response to the abortion question in the debate. Responding to College Republican Shri Thakur’s claim that “Abortion is murder and except in cases to save the mother’s life it should be illegal nationwide,” and that “corporations are paying women to kill their children and come back and be a good cubicle worker in the office,”[6] Ziegler claimed that Republicans wanted “to impose [their] world view on the rest of the country. That’s what Republicans believe forcing their own beliefs, their own religion on other people instead of letting others pursue their life plan.” Ziegler went on to say: “The rhetoric from the Republicans is inherently baked into religion” without understanding that what was true for Christians was a fortiori true for Jews. If Dobbs imposed Christian values on Jews, then Ziegler by his own logic had to admit that Roe imposed Jewish values on Christians for almost 50 years. “It’s inherently baked into people’s previous life values that should come into policymaking. Policymaking is about pragmatism; it’s about adhering to everyone’s interests. It’s not about imposing your own personal or religious views on others. I’m Jewish. I shouldn’t have to list to Christianity to tell me when life begins.”[7]

Taken aback by Ziegler’s sudden injection of the Jewish question into a debate on abortion, Thakur responded by saying:

First of all, I have not invoked religion once during this debate. He’s the one who just brought religion into this debate. You don’t need to be religious to understand the fact that human life begins at conception, and that we should not be killing innocent human beings. And just because his religion—I don’t know about Judaism—just because his religion supports abortion doesn’t mean abortion should be legal. The Aztecs supported child sacrifice. Should we allow that? You cannot play these morally relativist games with people’s lives.[8]

Incapable of understanding the point Thakur just made, Ziegler doubled down and played the Jewish card once again.

“He literally just equated Judaism to Aztec child sacrifice,” Ziegler whined. “That’s what you get with the Republican Party. And I just want to point out how demonstrably offensive that is.”

At this point the student crowd booed Ziegler, proving that they were also anti-Semitic.

Not content to leave it at that, Ziegler followed up with an article in The Observer, which appeared on November 10, 2022, in which he again blamed the “Religious Right” for the booing because they “frequently reference Christian values and religious teachings to support their position against abortion.” Ziegler opined that Supreme Court Justice Alito’s decision was “rooted in some religious traditions’ view of when life begins” without mentioning that his own position is equally religious because 140 Jewish organizations have affirmed that abortion is a fundamental Jewish value. Without once referring to the 140 Jewish organizations, Ziegler deflected the reader’s attention away from the issue at hand to “how some anti-abortion rhetoric is embedded in the blood libel accusation often levied against Jews.” Blood libel had nothing to do with the debate at Notre Dame, but Ziegler dragged it into the discussion because it is an ADL talking point. The same is true of “identifying abortion as ‘child sacrifice.’” At this point my name entered the discussion as an example of “dangerous rhetoric” because “Following the Dobbs decision, writer E. Michael Jones equated child sacrifice to Jews.”

It’s difficult to discern what Ziegler meant to convey in his awkward sentence, other than my name, but that brings up an interesting question: how did Ziegler learn about me? Was it from other Notre Dame students? That seems unlikely. More likely is that he went to the ADL website. If that is the case, did the ADL coach him before he engaged in the debate or wrote his article attacking me? The sentence is meaningless but typical of someone who thinks that ADL talking points are a substitute for rational argument.

When I shared the link to Ziegler’s article in The Observer with an ND alumnus who has a daughter at Notre Dame, I was told that “the memo” to argue abortion as a religious liberty issue for Jews has “even trickled down to hick places like Jefferson City, Missouri,” where sophomores at Notre Dame are encouraged to:

debate bills in the fake house and senate, then pass some and the mock governor signs them. One bill would permit abortion in Missouri. The bill’s sponsor argued that she was Jewish and she did not want the views of Christians forced on her because that was against her religion to be banned from having an abortion. (My sophomore) immediately raised his placard and quoted Exodus, with citation, and read “Thou shalt not kill.” He said that Jews follow the Old Testament but before he could get any words out, the teenage Lt. Governor pointed at him and said he had to sit down because he did not give a “trigger warning” on the word “kill.” You see, there is this rule that if you are going to say something that might cause another to experience some sort of mental anguish, you have to say “Trigger warning – sexual assault” for example. It is so stupid [that it was] beyond comprehension. So, the girl did not get in trouble for failing to say “trigger warning – abortion” when she presented her bill, but (my sophomore) got in trouble for not saying trigger warning before reading directly from the Bible off his phone. This is the world in which we currently live. So sad.

Unless we believe that great minds all run in the same circles, it is impossible to believe that these young Jews haven’t been coached to inject the Jewish question into the abortion issue. By dragging the fact that he is Jewish into the argument, Ziegler was telling the crowd that he had Jewish privilege, which exonerated him from the necessity of being rational or persuasive.


Sensing that the audience had turned against him, Ziegler doubled down again and dragged the Holocaust into the abortion debate. Like Hate Speech which was created by the ADL to derail any discussion of Jewish power, the Holocaust can be brought into any discussion which had not been terminated by the claim “I’m Jewish.” In this instance, Ziegler attempted to derail the prolife appropriation of the Holocaust. Comparisons between the number of Jews who died in the Holocaust and the number of babies who died because of abortion:

are antisemitic because of their underlying effect of distorting the reality of the tragic event. The Holocaust was the systematic extermination of six million European Jews and was the result of Nazi rhetoric meant to dehumanize the Jewish people. Any effort to liken the Holocaust to another event, no matter what it is, diminishes the experiences of Holocaust victims and survivors. It ignores their suffering for political gain through cheap talking points. At the same time, it undermines efforts to emphasize the seriousness of the Holocaust. We should care about the Holocaust because it was the Holocaust, not because some other issue appears similar to it.

By this point in the discussion, it was clear that being against abortion was anti-Semitic because abortion was a “fundamental Jewish value.” Jews didn’t have to explain why the fetus didn’t deserve the protection of the law. All someone like Ziegler had to do to win the argument was declare “I’m Jewish,” and if that didn’t succeed in cowing the opposition, he could go on to invoke the Holocaust. This meant that anyone who disagreed with Ziegler was an anti-Semite because “The language we use to articulate our arguments matters and has serious implications. If we tolerate antisemitic rhetoric, even when it’s not clearly antisemitic, it normalizes those behaviors and spurs prejudiced attitudes towards Jews.”


On November 16, 2022, the debate escalated again when The Observer published a letter to the editor entitled “Hate has no place here” demanding that the College Republicans be punished for opposing abortion, which was now portrayed as a “display of racist, transphobic, and antisemitic rhetoric.” Opposing abortion at what called itself a Catholic university was now portrayed as the promotion of “hateful sentiment on Notre Dame’s campus,” and the woke vigilantes who supported Ziegler were determined to hold “those who perpetrate it accountable.” By that they meant, “we want the Notre Dame administration to formally condemn the dangerous rhetoric promoted by College Republicans and commit to requiring comprehensive anti-bias training for student club officers.” It was difficult to tell whether this “anti-bias training” applied to College Democrats as well or just College Republicans.

Either way, it was clear that the debate was “not an isolated incident of hate speech and political extremism.” Au contraire, it represents a veritable “explosion of antidemocratic and hateful sentiments at Notre Dame.” The wave of hate speech which inundated the previously peaceful campus included an article in The Rover, the orthodox alternative to The Observer, which opined that “selling [Gay] Pride-related products at the bookstore was “tantamount to heresy.” As if that weren’t bad enough, “some students were overheard ridiculing . . . our first ever PrideFest last year,” which in case you haven’t heard about it, was “a major milestone for Notre Dame’s LGBTQ+ students.” Didn’t those students know that “remarks like these are disheartening”?

The list of atrocities goes on: “On top of that, the Young Americans for Freedom put up a sign in the Duncan Student Center last year that read ‘Lia Thomas is not a woman,’” which not only “isn’t emblematic of the Notre Dame family that we have touted and embraced,” it also led up to the most recent offense against common decency, as Notre Dame understands that term, which occurred when “Blake Ziegler called out an antisemitic comment made to him during the debate.” The fact that the audience booed Ziegler was “disgusting and highly offensive” especially since it was leveled against someone “who was simply holding someone accountable for insulting his religion.” According to the bio at the end of his Observer article:

Blake Ziegler is a senior at Notre Dame studying political science, philosophy and constitutional studies. He enjoys writing about Judaism, the good life, pressing political issues and more. Outside of The Observer, Blake serves as president of the Jewish Club and a teaching assistant for God and the Good Life.

Ziegler’s bio raises several interesting questions. If he “enjoys writing about Judaism,” why is he studying at what calls itself a Catholic university? Why didn’t he apply to Brandeis or a Jewish university like Harvard or any of the other Ivy League institutions which have been taken over by Jews? As Ron Unz, who is Jewish, has pointed out, America’s meritocracy succumbed to ethnic political pressure over the course of the 20th century. Ivy League admissions policies changed as the result of “covert ethnic tribal warfare” during the 1920s when the WASP elite tried in vain to keep the Jews out of their universities. In the end, “raw political power and the balance of contending forces rather than any idealistic considerations” determined who got into Harvard as “Jewish organizations and their allies mobilized their political and media resources to pressure the universities into increasing their ethnic enrollment by modifying the weight assigned to various academic and non-academic factors, raising the importance of the former over the latter.”[9]


If Ziegler’s Jewish forebears ensured that he had access to prestigious Ivy League institutions with significant Jewish enrollment, why did he end up at a third tier, soi disant Catholic institution like Notre Dame? Ziegler’s writing and debating skills show that he didn’t learn how to frame an argument or write a persuasive sentence during his four years at Notre Dame. In fact, after spending four years at Notre Dame, Ziegler has become a one-man refutation of the myth of Jewish intelligence. He is incapable of understanding that the inexorable implication of his claim that Hobbs imposed the Christian religion on Jews is that Roe v. Wade imposed the Jewish religion on Christians. If his Observer article is any indication of the education he received at Notre Dame, his parents should demand their money back. Given the Catholic position on abortion, given the fact that being anti-abortion now means being anti-Semitic, why is Blake Ziegler a Notre Dame student? Is it simply to push the goyim around whenever he’s about to lose an argument by stating “I’m Jewish,” which is something he could not do if he were at Brandeis or Harvard or any other Jewish institution? Did Ziegler’s SAT scores condemn him to attend a third-tier institution like Notre Dame? Or is something bigger afoot here? Is it possible that Ziegler was recruited to go to Notre Dame to take over the university which loudly proclaims its Catholic identity?

Those inclined to dismiss this idea as a preposterous conspiracy theory would do well to read Ron Radosh’s memoir Commies, which describes how he was recruited by the overwhelmingly Jewish Communist Party to take over the University of Wisconsin in the 1950s. In September 1955, Radosh left his native New York and travelled to Madison, Wisconsin, where he enrolled in the history program of that state’s university. His purpose was not learning but subversion. The Communist Youth League gave him a “ready-made community” in Madison, and Radosh began “burrowing from within.” In Commies, Radosh describes his purpose as “classically Leninist,” which involved his efforts “to gain influence in, and if possible take over other existing student groups.” Radosh and his communist friends infiltrated “the NAACP, the Young Democrats, the Students for Democratic action (youth arm of the fiercely anti-Communist ADA), the Film Society, the Student Council, the Student League for Industrial Democracy (a social-democratic group)” and turned them into institutions “to overthrow our capitalist democracy” and replace it with “a socialist revolution modeled on the USSR” (my emphasis). Radosh and his friends were evidently successful in subverting these organizations, because he assures us that “The old Commie tactic of ‘burrowing from within’ really did work.”[10]This paragraph originally appeared in the first edition of my book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, pp. 826-7.

Did Hesburgh have the Jewish takeover of the University of Wisconsin in mind when he told Ralph McInerny that “if you let the Jews in, they take over”? Or did experience closer to home lead him to make this claim? As some indication that the same Jewish takeover was happening at Notre Dame, I was invited by the conservative Catholic Brownson Society to give a lecture on the Czech general Jan Ziska. The moderator of this outspokenly Catholic club was Elliott Barkey, a Jewish professor who also happened to be a rabbi. As some indication that he took his role as moderator seriously, Barkey showed up for my talk. After listening to me describe Ziska’s military genius and the role which the Jews in Prague played in Bohemia’s Hussite rebellion, Barkey remained silent during the entire Q & A which followed the talk. Assuming that silence meant assent in this instance proved false. As everyone was leaving the seminar room, Barkey collared Chris Brophy, head of the club then and now a Dominican priest studying at Notre Dame, dragged him back into the room, slammed the door so that I couldn’t hear what was happening, and then called me an anti-Semite and upbraided Brophy for inviting me. Barkey, of course, could have called me an anti-Semite to my face during the Q & A following my talk, but this doesn’t fit in with the standard Jewish modus operandi, which involves character assassination behind closed doors.

That incident occurred roughly 20 years ago when I was in the middle of writing The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. During the intervening period, the modus operandi of Jewish subversion and control has remained the same even if the dramatis personae have changed, because subversion from within is an essential part of the Jewish revolutionary spirit and its 2,000 year long war against the Catholic Church. To paraphrase Ron Radosh, the old Jewish tactic of “burrowing from within” “really worked.”[11]This paragraph originally appeared in the first edition of my book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, pp. 826-7. In fact, it’s still working.

Infiltration, subversion and blackmail are part of the Jewish modus operandi in taking over institutions which they consider hostile to their interests. At around the same time that the debate took place at Notre Dame, a report in MintPressNews revealed that “hundreds of former military intelligence agents from “the notorious Israeli spying organization” Unit 8200 have acquired positions of influence in several big tech corporations, including Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Amazon.” Google “employs at a minimum, 99 former Unit 8200 agents and Microsoft retains the services of 166 such veterans.”[12] Google played a major role in promoting gay marriage and abortion in Ireland. Unit 8200 agents remained invisible because Israeli military law “requires them to conceal their affiliation with this special unit.”[13]

What is true of the Irish is also true for the Fighting Irish of Notre Dame. During Ziegler’s years at Notre Dame, the Student Council adopted the definition of anti-Semitism proposed by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, which defined the term as “any perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews,” saddling the university with a subjective formula based on Jewish “perception” which allowed students like Ziegler to win any debate by announcing that he was Jewish and that he had a “certain perception” that those who disagreed with him were anti-Semites.[14] The IHRA definition of anti-Semitism was nothing less than a formula for total control of discourse at Notre Dame as well as a license to punish any student who expressed support for Catholic principle which Jews didn’t like. The Church’s position on abortion was a good example of a punishable offense on campus, as Ziegler’s supporters pointed out in their letter to the editor.

Rather than speculating any further, I submitted the following list of questions to Mr. Ziegler:

  1. You mentioned my name in your recent article in The Observer. How did you find out about me?
  2. Did you play a role in the Student Council’s adoption of the IHRA’s definition of anti-Semitism? If so, what was that role?
  3. Are you now receiving financial aid from the Anti-Defamation League or any other Jewish organization? Can you tell me how much you have received and from which organization?
  4. Have you ever attended seminars sponsored by the ADL or any other Jewish organization? If so, can you list the topics covered at these meetings?
  5. Have you had any discussions about Notre Dame with the ADL or any other Jewish organization? Can you share with me the content of those discussions?
  6. Have you had any discussions about E. Michael Jones with the ADL or any other Jewish organization?

I’m still waiting for Mr. Ziegler’s response.

The story of how Ziegler played the Jewish card to attack College Republicans came out during a meeting of the Notre Dame chapter of the Nicodemus Society, which meets E. Michael Jones at night out of fear of the Jews. How, one freshman in attendance wondered, did the Catholic position on abortion become “hateful sentiment” at what calls itself a Catholic University?

The long answer to that question can be found in the series of articles on the Jewish Question in Europe which appeared in Civilta Cattolica, the official journal of the Vatican, during the fall of 1890. Their verdict on Catholic countries like France is equally applicable to quondam Catholic institutions like Notre Dame. Any institution which turns away from Catholic principle will end up being ruled by Jews:

France sets an example of this. She has just celebrated the first centenary of that revolution which separated her from God, the Church, and her kings. But how did she celebrate this solemnity? France prostrated herself in the dust of the Masonic temple of Solomon, humiliated under the feet of the Talmudic synagogue, as a slave of a swarm of foreign vultures who have already drained three-fifths of her ancestors’ patrimony from her. And thus, the revolution of 1789 has yielded her the glorious profit of passing from the noble submission to her most Christian kings over to the ignoble servitude of the kings of Mammon.[15]La Civilta Cattolica: The Jewish Question in Europe (South Bend, IN: Fidelity Press, 2020) p. 55.

The same thing could be said about Notre Dame following the Land o’ Lakes’ statement which proclaimed that university’s independence from the Catholic Church in 1967. If Catholic universities, “having been removed from the Church of Christ, won’t return to Her, they will wait in vain for their liberation from the iron yoke of the Jews”[16]La Civilta Cattolica: The Jewish Question in Europe (South Bend, IN: Fidelity Press, 2020) p. 55 because “modern Hebrews constitute the scourge of divine justice, and that the whole sweetness of liberalism will result in their being lured into the embrace of the voracious octopus of Judaism.”[17]La Civilta Cattolica: The Jewish Question in Europe (South Bend, IN: Fidelity Press, 2020) p. 56.

The “embrace of the voracious octopus of Judaism” invariably involves moral subversion and blackmail. Over the course of the 1980s a homosexual cabal took over Moreau Seminary, and then the Holy Cross order, and then the university they ran. As a result of that takeover, anyone who had the list of Holy Cross priests who were homosexuals could blackmail his way up the greasy pole of academic rank to an endowed chair. Mark Jordan, who arrived at Notre Dame as a married Thomist, soon discovered the inner sodomite, which helped him compile the list, but when he tried to go for an endowed chair, the administration turned him down, forcing him to decamp for Emery and then Harvard, where he now teaches gay whatever. Hesburgh’s heir apparent, the Rev. James Tunstead Burtchaell, CSC eventually got outed as a homosexual by Jordan, but only because he strayed from the reservation by writing Rachel Weeping, a book which was against abortion.

By the time he became its chairman, Father Richard McBrien was one of the few heterosexuals in the theology department. He was, as we used to say, living in sin with a woman, but immune from reprisal because the had the same list of homosexual Holy Cross priests that Mark Jordan had. McBrien’s girlfriend got fired from her job as DRE at Sacred Heart Parish on the Notre Dame campus, but McBrien’s list saved him from a similar fate, allowing him to fulminate in the privacy of his office to anyone who cared to listen that the “faggots are taking over Notre Dame.”

The faggots eventually took over Notre Dame in spite of McBrien’s defense of the theory and practice of heterosexuality, but in doing so they played into the hands of the Jews, as Civilta Cattolica had predicted. Hesburgh had an inkling that this was going to happen when he told Ralph McInerny that “if you let the Jews in, they take over,” but he let them in anyway because he wanted money from the big foundations.

During the first decade of the 21st century, homosexual students were recruited to study at Notre Dame as a way of disrupting what was left of the Catholic character of the university, according to the Rev. Jeffrey Langan, an Opus Dei priest now serving as a chaplain to students at Harvard and MIT. “When I was a professor at ND,” Langan recalls, “I met several students who confided to me that they were recruited by homosexual organizations to come to ND to be student activists. They were fed info by these homosexual groups to say and act in conformity with the national agenda. If the homosexual groups were doing this in 2005, I’m forced to conclude that the ADL and other Jewish organizations along with students like Zeigler, could certainly be acting in this way now. If fact, if someone who knows Zeigler presses him, I’m sure he would admit it or brag about it.”

In the wake of the midterm elections in Pennsylvania, I explained how a Jewish Katholikenfresser like Josh Shapiro could get elected governor in a state where the Catholic vote determined every election. The explanation was simple. When Catholic women had abortions and refused to repent, they became Jews because abortion is not only “a fundamental Jewish value,” it is also the Jewish sacrament of initiation which gets Catholic women to vote like Jews. The same is true of sodomy, the other Jewish sacrament, and the effect it has on celibate members of the clergy. So, pace, Fr. Hesburgh. You let the Jews in, and they are only doing what comes naturally to their distorted natures. They are proselytizing for their religion by promoting sodomy and abortion among a crowd of conversos who are Catholic in name only because they have rebelled against the Church’s teaching on sexuality at your instruction.





[4] E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi, p. 554.

[5] E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi, p. 554-5.





[10] This paragraph originally appeared in the first edition of my book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, pp. 826-7.

[11] This paragraph originally appeared in the first edition of my book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, pp. 826-7.




[15] La Civilta Cattolica: The Jewish Question in Europe (South Bend, IN: Fidelity Press, 2020) p. 55.

[16] La Civilta Cattolica: The Jewish Question in Europe (South Bend, IN: Fidelity Press, 2020) p. 55

[17] La Civilta Cattolica: The Jewish Question in Europe (South Bend, IN: Fidelity Press, 2020) p. 56.

Hide 236 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Anon[366] • Disclaimer says:

    What is true of the Irish is also true for the Fighting Irish of Notre Dame

    The Notre Dame Fighting Irish have only won national 🏈 championship in the last 45 years. And that was 34 years ago. Coincidence? I think not! The Golden Dome has been tarnished with a lavender hue.

    …During the run up to Roe, when Jews like Bernard Nathanson and Lawrence Lader were leading the abortion crusade in New York, the word Jew never got mentioned in the New York Times

    Nb: Nathanson later became a pro-life advocate and converted to Catholicism. Died a saint.

    Mark Jordan, who arrived at Notre Dame as a married Thomist, soon discovered the inner sodomite, which helped him compile the list, but when he tried to go for an endowed chair, the administration turned him down, forcing him to decamp for Emery and then Harvard, where he now teaches gay whatever.


  2. You cannot get ahead in life without a university degree

    You cannot get a university degree without being a conformist

    You cannot be allowed to be a conformist without anti-bias training

    No natural genius is allowed; no illiteracy is allowed; no one allowed go his own way, minding his own business, tending to his own thoughts…

    Welcome to the beehive.

  3. Trinity says:

    The Jew brings up the state of Texas describing a fictional scene of an uncle raping his 12 year old niece. Shlomo must have been talking about a Mexican or Black guy since incest and rape are much more common in those communities. Maybe Shlomo was talking about a Jew pervert in Houston raping his 12 year old niece. Hard to imagine, right people? SARC.

    India, Middle East, Southeast Asia, NYC, California, etc., all have more incest and pedophilia than any Southern State. Bet on it.

    • Disagree: Biff
  4. Anonymous[282] • Disclaimer says:

    You know, that begs an interesting question, if his opponent and the audience really believed that this Ziegler fellow was advocating the murder of innocent babes, why even have an argument about it, get up on the stage and disable the Ziegler unit, what is there to say? Same goes for every other great turning point in American history where it was obvious to one side that the other was leading everyone astray to great disaster for the heritage folk, with that much at stake why did no one bother to put a stop to it? Why does burrowing and tunneling and funneling work so well on these dumb people? Are the goyim really like cattle to be slaughtered like the rabbis have said? It seems to be true, honestly.

    • Replies: @Kinky Friedman
    , @1jonny
  5. Another great piece from EMJ, the best writer in UNZ. Thanks.

    Women with feminism is the jews’ greatest weapon against its host society, along with the infamous jewish banking usury. The whole child-murdering ritual(‘abortion’) debate itself speaks conclusively that why women should be considered as second citizens, why the so-called “women’s liberation” is one of the most evil things ever happened in history, and why women should be subjugated to men.

  6. Dumbo says:

    “In fact, you’ll never find the word ‘abortion’ in the report.”

    You know, I watched a full-length progressive documentary about abortion, and the word was not mentioned once. They just said “right to choose”.

    It’s like “love is love”. Satanists love euphemisms.

    Of course, “right to choose” sounds better than “killing fetuses”, and “love is love” sounds better than “anal and oral sex between random males in public bathrooms.”

    • Thanks: Father Coughlin
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  7. A. Clifton says: • Website

    Nigs gonna nig,

    {{{{JEWS}}}} gonna {{{{JEW}}}…

    what you gonna do…?

    Come out from among her….”BE YE SEPARATE”

    Vigilantes Of CHRISTENDOM …by Richard Kelly Hoskins

  8. Hesburgh was a major player in forcing “civil rights” on the South

  9. defined the term as “any perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews,” saddling the university with a subjective formula based on Jewish “perception” which allowed students like Ziegler to win any debate by announcing that he was Jewish and that he had a “certain perception” that those who disagreed with him were anti-Semites.

    Said definition speaks of “perception of Jews”, not of perception BY Jews, as you are implying. Really, I don’t know why I waste my time with morons such as this Jones character. It is obvious that Ron Unz just uses this site to promote his own articles, having nothing but contempt for much of the material he publishes. He said so himself. By the way, I’ve just read his latest, about World War I, and, right or wrong — I cannot judge with my limited knowledge — it was brilliantly written, and a good reading overall.

    • Disagree: Rich
  10. If I had a million dollars for every Catholic man who has NEVER had premarital sex, non-procreational sex without a condom, never railed against abortion while making sure his girlfriend is on contraceptives, never paid for his girlfriend’s abortion, never paid for his teenage daughter’s abortion, or was gay or was a gay priest shagging men… get the picture. And I would never have a million dollars.

    If I had a penny for every Catholic man who was a total hypocrite about sex and abortion I’d be richer than Rothschild.

    All hypocrites. 100%. That’s of course my experience. Maybe your experience is different. But if so I’d say you’re lying to yourself.

    That’s why it’s impossible to take Jones seriously. He posits an illusory reality. Sorry E. Michael, I don’t have, based on reason, rationality, I can’t have any faith in your male fantasy about males. I know what men want and what they try to get and how easily they lie about it. I will never trust any man’s anti-abortion opinion. And most women, pro abortion or anti abortion, if you ask them heart to heart, would never trust them either.

  11. their purpose was to overturn the teaching of the Catholic Church as a prelude to striking down this country’s laws prohibiting the sale of contraceptives

    This is called not imposing religious beliefs on persons who reject their claim to universal validity, aka a founding principle of the secular republic known as the United States. The US was the first country “founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without pretense to miracle or mystery” in John Adams’ words. The rejection of revealed religion was the cornerstone of the Enlightenment whose principles inspired the generation that fought the War of Independence. Inventing a religious piety for these men that they did not possess has been an American cottage industry since the “Second Great Awakening” swept the country in the 1820’s, a reaction by those for whom liberation from ancient superstition was too challenging to tolerate.

  12. The Negro abortion rate is 4x that of EuroAmericans. Many support abortion for this reason.

    • Troll: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Jud Jackson
    , @Tucker
  13. Trinity says:
    @Prof Watson

    Bullshit. The majority of women aborting babies in America are White. That is more Jew horseshit lies like the “11 million illegal invader” number they used for over a decade. Like the 2% number for Jews they have used forever, is that just counting “religious Jews?” Sheboons and Hispanic females poop out one baby after another, hell, A Black or Brown breeding machine with 6 kids before they reach their late 20’s or early 30’s is all too common. Black grandmothers who are under 40 is also more common than you think. Blacks at 13% of the population? Hell in the Deep South we only wish this were true. Now with the (((importation of African & Latin America/Carribean Blacks, sending them to very White areas))) that number is above 13%. Bet on it.

    The number of Brown, Black and Yellow females having abortions is tiny. It is WHITE FEMALES mostly and that is why Jews are for it. Supporting abortion is as much of a race issue as it is a moral issue. It is being used to genocide the White race.

    • Replies: @Prof Watson
    , @Dutch Boy
  14. Legba says:

    Why do you people continue to deal with Jews?

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Art
  15. @Trinity

    You gave no citations for your allegations. “( – Although black Americans comprise 13.4% of the U.S. population, they accounted for 36.0% of the abortions in 2015, which was almost identical to the percentage of abortions (36.9%) that year among white Americans, who make up 76.6% of the population.
    The report also showed that the abortion rate among black people (25.1) was higher than that of white people (6.8). Abortion rate, according to the CDC, describes the number of abortions in a certain racial or ethnic group per 1,000 women in that same group. (4 to1)
    In addition, the abortion ratio, or the number of abortions per 1,000 live births within a given racial or ethnic group, was much higher among black women (390) than white women (111). In Georgia, for example, where blacks make up 32.2% of the population and whites make up 60.8%, black women had 62.4% of abortions while whites only had 24.7%.”

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @No jack london
  16. This is the first time I’ve read or heard EMJ say that sodomy is a “Jewish sacrament.” That’s a notable step; I think it needs more documentation.

    • Replies: @Anon
  17. Trinity says:

    Jews are given respect that they never earned or deserved. Whites allow Jews to “bogart” the narrative. While I do think the Khazar/Jew population is at least 5% in America, that is still tiny compared to 55-58% which is what I think is the TRUE population of PURE Whites of European ancestry in America today.

    The time for kicking these useless parasites ( the Jews) to the curb should have happened in the turbulent 1960’s. The Jew orchestrated everything back then, from acid rock to the hippie movement to leftist domestic terrorism to Black riots to feminism. Jew names across the board. Same with the 1965 Immigration Reform Act. By 1970-1972, America should have been #110. IF we had given the Jew the boot 50 years ago how much better would we be in 2022?? Are you better off in 2022 than you were in 1962? 1972? 1982? Or even 1992? Look no further than the small hats.

    (((They))) are nation desroyers,ALWAYS, IF you LET THEM.

  18. Emslander says:

    If I had a penny for every Catholic man who was a total hypocrite about sex and abortion I’d be richer than Rothschild.

    I suspect that these assertions DO reflect your imaginary life. I’m an older Catholic man who grew up around Catholic males, have Catholic males for sons and know many Catholic couples who have been faithful to their marriage vows into old age. I attended Notre Dame when it was all male. Like young men in the military, we generally found and still find work, study and duty powerful enough to overcome what you describe.

    Young Catholic men are no less interested in women than any other men and my experience is that fantasies aside, they marry Catholic women in order to have procreative relations with them.

    I question whether you’ve ever known anyone who actually is a Roman Catholic. I think that you’re wrong on every count.

    Hypocrisy is the great cry of the devil who can’t imagine faithful behavior from anyone, primarily because they’re not capable of it.

  19. Dumbo says:
    @Brás Cubas

    It is obvious that Ron Unz just uses this site to promote his own articles, having nothing but contempt for much of the material he publishes. He said so himself.

    Sounds like a typically Jewish trait? 😀

    To be honest, Ron’s better as an editor, and in allowing his platform to be used for all kinds of dissenting views, than as a writer.

    Ron’s own-penned long-winded articles mostly suck. At least, he finished with the “biolab Covid” stuff, which was getting tiresome. This one about WWI seems more interesting, maybe I’ll check it out.

    • Replies: @Wild Man
    , @Che Guava
  20. Dumbo says:
    @Prof Watson

    Even if it’s true that Black women abort more than White women (which I’m not sure), this doesn’t make it right, and of course it also affect white women, even if (according to your numbers) slightly less.

    Also, abortion is being pushed all over the world, especially in all European countries including the former Catholic Ireland, Italy and Poland. And there; it’s mostly white women aborting, certainly not the immigrants, I can guarantee.

    Supporting abortion as some form of demographic control, because you are unable or unwilling to stop immigration, is really stupid. It just drives down even more the White birth rate.

    • Replies: @Prof Watson
  21. @Emslander

    Ok Emslander, I stand corrected. But in my opinion there are not many men like you.

  22. Wild Man says:
    @Brás Cubas

    I don’t think E. Michael Jones was wrong for his claim that his analysis reveals ‘perceptions by Jews’, even though it is also true that you are also not wrong to claim that E. Michael Jones take, in-of-itself, is a ‘perception of Jews’. Jones’ claim is both (i.e. – the first claim as ‘subjective claim’ and the second claim as ‘objective claim’) – no?

    But otherwise, I do tend to disagree with E. Michael Jones about his overall take on the Christian gestalt (i.e. – as far as I can tell, his musing over ‘The Logos’ …. too simplistic, ….. Jones doesn’t feature the requirement, for the doubts and anxieties borne of ‘ontological humility’, to exist in the Christian mind, so much, and that is where he errs, …. at least to my mind).

  23. @Brás Cubas

    Said definition speaks of “perception of Jews”, not of perception BY Jews, as you [i.e., EMJ] are implying.

    On the contrary, the entirety of the IHRA Working Definition makes plain that it views Jewish perceptions of literally everything as the only perceptions that matter:

    Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.

    Furthermore, what ought to be equally plain to anyone for whom English is a cradle tongue is that the words and the grammar chosen to express the definition are as weaselly as they could possibly be made. Indeed, the weasels who have written these words are to be congratulated for saying, in effect, “anti-Semitism is anything that any Jew at any time and in any place says it is,” except they manage to say that without using any of those far simpler and more candid words, which would of course succeed only in bringing contempt-filled laughter down upon the speakers from all but their equally contemptible Jewish brethren.

    In short, Dr. Jones’s reading is 100 percent correct, and your “analysis” is 100 percent wrong. Being wrong is a bad habit to fall into.

    • Replies: @Chriss
  24. Wild Man says:

    I also read your subsequent exchange with Emslander. There are also men who were raised Catholic, that rejected the Catholic sexual mores in our 1970’s youth, ….. who went on to be absolutely monogamous in long marriages nevertheless, ….. and then, … even further to that, … there are some such sort-of secularized Catholics, whose long marriages didn’t survive anyways, despite the fact their spouse was also committed to the monogamy of the marriage relationship.

    Then, for these such men, …. going on to try to form a new romantic relationship, …. and finding that the whole thing, in the newer era, seems to be filled with selfish immorality on both romantic sides (left unexamined in our lustful youth), and ultimately, coming to agree that the original Catholic doctrine about promoting monogamous marriage is spot-on.

    That would more or less summarize my own views. A man like me, until maybe just a few years ago now, saw the abortion issue as a women’s issue, for women to sort out amongst themselves, because truth be told, a man can’t control what a woman chooses to do with that region of her body, without locking her up. As such, I thought that perhaps it was best for men to defer to the sisterhood, and let them come up with a resolution to the abortion conflict. But the sisterhood has failed (later term abortion, though rare, is allowed in many locales and this is beyond disgusting, ….. my conclusion being, …. the sisterhood has failed). Somebody (I would say subversive cultural forces) has decided to feature standard womanly discretion (to keep views on ‘moral vs. pragmatic’ dilemmas, tightly held to chest) as indiscretion, …. widely promoting many women to now take on the stance of ‘anti-woman-discretion’ (i.e – the indiscretion of discounting the ‘moral’ in favor of the ‘pragmatic’, instead of the prior womanly discretion to allow space for herself and her sisters, to balance the moral and the pragmatic).

    That’s what this abortion debate looks like to me.

  25. @WingsofADove

    All hypocrites. 100%. That’s of course my experience. Maybe your experience is different. But if so I’d say you’re lying to yourself.

    Your experience is both worthless and uninformative. And I’m not lying to myself or anyone else in saying that I wouldn’t rely on your report of what the present month or year is without corroboration from a more reliable source—even a Jewish one.

    • Agree: Al Liguori
  26. anarchyst says:

    Simple solution:
    Restore Catholic doctrine at Notre Dame.
    Expel all jews from Notre Dame.
    The University would be much better off.

    • Agree: Emslander
  27. Wild Man says:


    I took issue with your claim that Unz – “At least, he finished with the “biolab Covid” stuff, which was getting tiresome”, … and in response comment to you, provided some rationale as to why this is going to continue to be a thorny issue for Unz (unless he goes much more censorious of commenters), …. and a few minute later, … my comment is trashed.

    Hahahahahahahaha!!! What stupid jokes Unz tells by his actions. I am laughing at the inept try. He will have to discredit his own site in order to build a moat around his continuing covid stupidity. We’ll see. Unz f*cked-up on his overall take on the covid phenomenon. He either comes clean, or pays the price, one way or the other. I suggest it would be better for him to come clean.

  28. @Observator

    The rejection of revealed religion was the cornerstone of the Enlightenment whose principles inspired the generation that fought the War of Independence.

    As usual, you speak with equal parts forthrightness and dishonesty.

    Your characterization of the Enlightenment as founded upon hatred of religion—specifically, Catholicism—is completely correct and, as it happens, far more honest than the usual droll claims that science and truth were the movement’s hallmarks. But the notion that there was any unanimity of principle, “philosophical” or otherwise, among the Founders wouldn’t withstand thirty seconds of close examination. Their one and only absolute commonality was a strong disinclination to paying the taxes that their acknowledged monarch and his loyal servants, in Parliament assembled, required them to pay.*
    *George III doesn’t look especially tyrannical when his taxation policies are compared with those of the Jews who run Biden’s administration in the senile old crook’s name.

    • Thanks: Joe Levantine
  29. @Anon

    forcing him to decamp for Emery and then Harvard, where he now teaches gay whatever.


    No, Jones was indeed referring to Emery University, one of the outstanding institutions of higher learning on Pitcairn Island.*

    The educational method unique to this distinguished institution involves a belief that students are most productively taught when they are put into a true tabula rasa condition—that is to say, when the “rasa” part applies to the body as well as to the mind.

    How better to remove all external physical impurities and accretions than a vigorous rubdown with freshly mined emery!

    • Thanks: Bubba
  30. LaraLara says:

    The only way to get rid of the abortion question is to have no law at all. The idea that a woman needs a law or a doctor to miscarry is beyond naive. Women have forced miscarries forever and sometimes they just happen. Anything over a certain period in the pregnancy should be illegal and this I agree. But the idea that you can tell someone they must have the child is wrong. Christians being pro-life should have no problem because they are against, ok. Jews/Atheists/Whomever should have to seek out services in a timely manner at their own expense and no doctor should have to perform an abortion. So, if you can’t find a doctor…throw yourself down the stairs, try blackmailing baby daddy, it’s not my problem. There also should be no rewards from the state for babies, that will just be neglected. Maybe at some point people will be more careful about their choices.
    I get it, in old England and everywhere there were all those orphans and what to do? What do you do, help if you choose. Civilization is what makes it sad. Before we were civilized the land was open and you could have your children and feed them and build your own huts and lived in your tribes and you and yours could roam the land freely. Then we became civilized, and the land was parceled and owned, and labor was distributed, but not everyone could own some land. there was the poor, the middle, the rich who owned the most.

  31. @Dumbo

    In America, imagine if all those African Americans had their welfare babies. Are you willing to be their baby daddy and support them? Dr. David Duke is not.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @CanadianGoose
  32. @Priss Factor

    I thought it was a good announcement.
    I also factor in his schedule is probably the most
    energy consuming in history.

    Mostly dems and deep staters and the dumbs
    are attacking Trump: low energy, time to move on, too crude, whatever.


    He is the leader and the reason.

  33. Rich says:

    Birth control didn’t turn Catholic women into Jews, Vatican 2 turned them into Protestants. The Catholic women of my acquaintance were less likely to abort than secular or Jewish women. Church going women appear less likely to abort but Church attendance has dropped among all sects. I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that orthodox Jewish women who attend temple services are also less likely to abort. Christians who’ve left the Faith are even more dangerous than secular or anti-Christian Jews. They use the Jews and the anti-Christian Jews use them to promote their unique brand of Satanism.

  34. Dumbo says:
    @Prof Watson

    But then the problem is welfare, not abortion.

    I think people tend to see universal abortion as eugenic, but it seems to have been mostly dysgenic.

  35. @Old Brown Fool

    That is true: all people must at least seem to conform by acceptance to something. People demanding to have total, and/or idiosyncratic, autonomy always bring on the worst oppressors. Russians who opposed the Tsar and a proclaimed Christian state brought on Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin.

    As Bob Dylan said, You, each one of us, must serve somebody. You either serve Christ and right culture, or you serve the Devil.

    Perhaps the most important sentence in Jones’s article: “Any institution which turns away from Catholic principle will end up being ruled by Jews.” That is how the rebellion against Christendom, the Reformation led directly to riot that ruined morals and created secular societies that now are openly anti-christ and operated largely by Jews and for Jewish money.

    Jones knows and says that. But what Jones must face is that Vatican II was the Catholic Church emasculating itself before the secular fruits of the Reformation and Jews. The Vatican II church is a form of godliness that is not godliness, and Jews love it because they can easily boss it around and bribe it when it cannot be bossed by Jews. Just like Anglicanism and Lutheranism and every Protestant group of any size or power.

    It requires the Catholic Church to set aside Vatican II and rediscover itself rightly for this honor story bro be opposed inlays that can defeat it.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Getaclue
    , @NIdahoCatholic
  36. @Prof Watson

    Personally, I just don’t feel the church is protecting their flock by supporting the idea that abortion should be a public discussion. Abortion should be in the closet. Abortion should be a grueling, heart-wrenching decision with most people against the idea. Abortion should be on the conscience, between the person their family and their God.
    As long as there are laws, and a public discussion Christians will be forced to pay just like now, sharing the burden of someone else’s decision. Sharing the burden of the government’s decision when they use tax-payer money to fund abortion not just here but around the world and funding institutions like the United Nations. I don’t think the churches are doing a very good job of protecting their flocks from this at all. Making abortion illegal will only bring abortion back on the table as a public discussion when the churches stand on this issue to their flock should be NO, without discussion. No law, no discussion, you can’t stop others but you can make it clear to yours and help shield them from someone else’s life choice.

    • Replies: @Anon
  37. Churches can say what they want. In Nazi Germany, the churches spoke out against the government taking lives, like they do today in the West, but the state does what they do. The churches speak their mind.
    “Rabbi Yosef: Doctors kill the living
    In weekly sermon, Shas’ spiritual leader recalls how mothers he convinced not to have abortions gave birth to healthy babies According to Chief Rabbi of Israel, Ovadia Yosef, you are an apostate and raised goy and will go to Hades. According to the Chief Rabbi of Israel, “Reform” is not even Jewish. “Rabbi Yosef: Doctors kill the living In weekly sermon, Shas’ spiritual leader recalls how mothers he convinced not to have abortions gave birth to healthy babies. During the sermon Rabbi Yosef praised the pro-life organization EFRAT, calling its employees “righteous.”Earlier this week, Israel’s Chief Rabbis Yona Metzger and Shlomo Amar called on all Israeli rabbis to fight the “abortion epidemic in our country.” Earlier this week, Israel’s Chief Rabbis Yona Metzger and Shlomo Amar called on all Israeli rabbis to fight the “abortion epidemic in our country.” The chief rabbis instructed them to “bring up the Exodus Torah reading during their sermon on Saturday regarding the “biblical prohibition to kill fetuses in their mothers’ intestines.”,7340,L-4004368,00.html

  38. @Old Brown Fool

    You cannot get ahead in life without a university degree

    You cannot get a university degree without being a conformist

    You cannot be allowed to be a conformist without anti-bias training

    Freshman orientation at Columbia induced déjà-vu in this exile from the DPRK:

    • Thanks: Automatic Slim, Ace
  39. aandrews says:

    L’Affaire Williamson: The Catholic Church and Holocaust Denial

    Privately, however, Hesburgh knew that there were risks involved here. As an ardent devotee of everything Harvard did and stood for (the crowning moment in Hesburgh’s career was his being named to the Harvard Board of Overseers), Hesburgh must have been aware that Harvard had strict quotas that limited the number of Jews who got admitted there. There is some indication that Hesburgh not only knew this, but that he also agreed with why Harvard imposed quotas on Jews because he told Ralph Mclnerny “if you let the Jews in, they take over.”

    For once Father Hesburgh was prescient, because this is what has happened in both Notre Dame and academe in general, as the rise of a “renowned historian” like Deborah Lipstadt shows. Over the course of the 40 years after Sam Shapiro was hired, Jews were hired in increasing numbers at Notre Dame. Like Deborah Lipstadt, the Jews at Notre Dame make up for their lack of scholarship by their zeal in thought control. A few instances should make this clear.

  40. TrueIrish says:

    A few years back my then HS son and I attended a Notre Dame invite only college presentation at a Catholic school. The woman giving the presentation did not mention the word “God”, or “Jesus” or “Catholic”, but rather, touted the school, as the last slide of her presentation stated, as “A force for good”. I leaned over to my son and said “I think they have one too many ‘o’s’ in there!” Notre Dame isn’t Catholic. I also learned that the school is primarily made up of students from public schools, which I find to be very odd.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  41. Anonymous[446] • Disclaimer says:
    @Old Brown Fool

    Funny because I see Hispanic immigrants who can’t read in any language making money hand-over-fist all over the place by the sweat of their brow and strength of their back.

    My dad is 64 and he’s still doing it, probably the last white guy you see doing yard work for a living anywhere on the West Coast. My wife’s entire family is white union electricians with high school educations and it still holds true for the Millennials in the family. They all own their houses.

    The problem is status-obsessed Americans think it’s beneath them to sweat outside the gym. You’ve bought into the scam. “Can’t get ahead without a degree” is just as false as “it’s too expensive to raise children.” It’s Jim Jones’ Kool-Aid. You don’t have to drink it.

  42. @Emslander

    Half of my family are Catholics. My mother was a Catholic. One of my sisters is a Catholic. Most of my cousins are Catholics.

    Having said that…..Catholics are generally insane hypocritical shitheads….and they generally have total jewbrain.

    Catholics vote around 80% left……which is INSANE because one of the main tenets of marxism is hatred of religion (with intense hatred of the Christian religion in general)

    TBH, I do not understand why Catholics are such crazy cucks. I guess that many decades of jewing simply ruined the Catholics.

    My God, look at Biden and Pelosi. Disgusting filth.

    I can’t even talk to one of my favorite Catholic cousins anymore because he’s just so fucking irritating.

    Oh….and a childhood mentor as well… the woman but she’s a liberal Catholic nutcase. She lives in a sea of cognitive dissonance. I love her like a second mom but it’s nearly impossible to talk to her because she manages to turn everything into a political battlefield, and I don’t have the heart to tell her to fuck off entirely.

    My college roommate (Catholic) same deal. The dumb bastard even read “The Culture Of Critique,” couldn’t come up with any solid criticism, but still votes left.


    Mel Gibson is just about the only Catholic I can think of that doesn’t piss me off with shitlibbery.

    • Agree: Old and Grumpy
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @JM
    , @Swaytonious
  43. For the next decade, as more and more Catholic women neutered themselves with contraceptives …

    Sometimes a person stops reading before the end of an essay. I’ve no need to immerse myself in the scribblings of a fanatical rightwingnut Catholic.
    For what it’s worth, here is a snippit from the Rational Wiki for this author.

    Jones was a one-time hippy who was fired from his teaching position at Saint Mary’s College, a private Catholic women’s school in Indiana, apparently for expressing anti-abortion views too extreme even for the Catholics.

    • Replies: @Unashamed Catholic
  44. @LaraLara

    Abortion laws exist to destroy a man’s claim to his own children. They reduce children to property. Specifically, property of women to which men have no rights. For more info on this subject see “family court.”

    This is from a law proposed in California earlier this year:

    “123467. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death.”

    Perinatal. Up to 24 months after the birth of the child. No questions asked.

    This is absolutely disgusting and you’re culpable if you’re a Roe supporter.

  45. anonymous[203] • Disclaimer says:

    1)When SCOTUS overturned ROE vrs Wade (which originally was based on a LIE)..I was dumbfounded to see the bleeding hysterical reaction from the jews and only the jews. Why? I can NOT understand how a religion of the “chosen” people advocate killing babies…and how can a life loving God choose such people. This is just incoherent, illogical. Then I realize that perhaps the old legends about jewish child sacrifice to Molocht is NOT a far fetched antisemitic legend.

    2) Most women that abort is not because of rape/incest/health issues, most are deceived encourage to abort even if the baby is the product of a consensual relationship, and without the consent of the OWNER of the other 50% of the fetus? The jewish definition of a fetus has reached repugnancy making IT ok to kill a baby that somehow survives abortion and is born alive..thats MURDER/Homicide. 3) The same jews that demand abortions (whites/blacks) are also decrying the low fertility rate for the USA domestic population.. and encouraging open borders for NON whites (CRT?). 4) As usual the jewish axiom is once again proven right..follow the money: THE GAY LGBT AGENDA is being supported/finance by powerful BIGPHARMA/Medical/Hospital/psychiatric INDUSTRIAL complex run by…JEWS. They want goyim children to grow up addicted to gay/lgbt medications/therapies etc. 5) I can NOT explain how the jews being less than 6% of the populations have practically humiliated/muted/silence Buddhists/Muslims/Methodists/Anglicans/Lutherans/Mormons/Calvinists and my heroes traditional staunchly christian/proAmerica Southern Baptists..please not them ??. The CATHOLIC church had been victimized surrender to the The Holocaust Syndrome? the Antisemitic labelism? So they welcome the JEWS massively and they came to Notre Dame, Goergetown, StJames, Harvard,Yale, which were originally CHRISTIAN PROTESTANTS..and demanded JEWISH Holocaust privileges. And after more than 70yrs of Ecumenism the JEWS still HATE CHRISTIANITY CATHOLICISM profoundly even more now…they cling steadfastly to their Talmudic abhorrent anti Christian/goyim beliefs about Christ. Remember the fable about the Scorpion and the frog. The scorpion begged the frog to carry him across the river..once safely on the other shore the scorpion pricked the frog. The drowning frog ask why? the Scorpion responded because it is in my NATURE..thats why I am an scorpion….Jewish “nature”.

  46. Anon[152] • Disclaimer says:

    Apparently these days 20% of the Student population at Georgetown is Jewish

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  47. Chriss says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    There is no European culture without Christianity, and Christianity is based on the Jewish Bible and comes from Christ, who was a Jew. Therefore, anti-Semites are very often also anti-Christians, not realizing that they are undercutting the foundations of the culture they want to defend. And the importance of Jews in this culture does not end with Christianity. A great many of the most influential European thinkers of the 19th and 20th centuries were Jews, to mention only Marx, Freud and Einstein. As far as philosophies are concerned, almost everything that was decisive in getting out of the dark alley of “modern” history came from the Jews. For example, such philosophers as Bergson (Zbytkower), Husserl, Cassirer, Levy-Strauss and Tarski were Jews. Many of the leading communists were Jews, but the leading French anti-communist, Raymond Aron, was also Jewish. There is no European culture without Jews, and anti-Semitism is therefore an extremely anti-European superstition. The question naturally arises as to why anti-Semitism is so widespread, even in countries where Jews are a small and well-assimilated minority, as in pre-war Germany, where anti-Semitism was at its peak. The answer to this question is complex, it seems that anti-Semitism has several causes. One of them is probably envy, because the Jews produce a relatively high proportion of highly gifted people, and as a result, they sometimes occupy leading positions in literature, science, philosophy, and even politics. Another reason, perhaps, is that the same nation produces relatively large numbers of intolerant and ruthless people as soon as they are in power. This is manifested, among other things, in their disregard for the religious and patriotic feelings of the gentiles. They are largely responsible for the spread of anti-Semitism. In the twentieth century, a sinister influence was also exerted by the fact that many people of this type held power on behalf of the communist parties and the crimes committed by them were subsequently attributed to all Jews, which is superstition, of course, but nevertheless partly explains the popularity of anti-Semitism.

    2. Apart from this basic superstition, it is worth mentioning another one, consisting in considering anti-Semitism as something much worse, more criminal than hostility towards other national groups. This can be understood today insofar as one thinks about German anti-Semitism, which caused the genocide of the Jews – and in this sense it was undoubtedly something worse than, for example, the dislike of the Flemish towards the Walloons in Belgium. But the genocide to which the Armenians fell victim after the First World War is just as condemnable as the Nazi crimes. Perhaps the difference in opinion comes from the fact that Jews are considered to be the “chosen people”, which even most Jews today do not believe.

    3. Finally, it is superstitious to think that one cannot like Jews less than others, that anyone who prefers, for example, an Italian or a Chinese to a Jew is an anti-Semite. It is true that everyone has the right to like or dislike anyone, as long as they do not violate the law when it comes to a person they do not like. Everyone has not only the right, but also the duty to like their relatives more than strangers, so, for example, Russians more than Frenchmen or Jews. Whoever calls people who feel so anti-Semitic falls into superstition.

  48. @Dumbo

    Just as the misogynists and sperm worshippers NEVER mention woman dying in septic abortions.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  49. @Prof Watson

    A foetus in the mother’s intestines is an ectopic pregnancy, and highly dangerous. Mind you, it must be the way Nutty-yahoo came into the world. Yosef was also the charmer who declared that the goyim were only born to ‘ serve the Jews’.

  50. @LaraLara

    Many so-called ‘pro-life’ Rightists are also pro-aggression militarists and pro-inequality and human misery class warriors. Poisonous hypocrites, hiding their misogyny behind a slimy facade.

    • LOL: Emslander
    • Replies: @Kinky Friedman
  51. “The language we use to articulate our arguments matters and has serious implications. If we tolerate antisemitic rhetoric, even when it’s not clearly antisemitic, it normalizes those behaviors and spurs prejudiced attitudes towards Jews.”

    Perhaps the prejudiced attitude towards Jews is well deserved. Perhaps the Jews are actually doing their utmost to deserve it with their uniquely obnoxious behaviour as a group.

  52. Letting Jews into a Christian university—and by “Christian university” I mean any institution of higher education founded by Christians—is like letting venomous snakes into a children’s nursery. The enemies of God and truth have nothing to contribute. The three Jews most often touted as intellectual giants—Marx, Freud, and Einstein—were all frauds. And goes for Christian universities also goes for Christian nations.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Passing By
  53. Z-man says:

    The Roman Catholic Church must turn hard right and take its cue from the SSPX or fail and die as a vassal of Jew dominated globalist ‘progressive’ hogwash.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Anon
  54. @Prof Watson

    I do for sure. Black abortion is the best thing we can have.

  55. Anonymous[729] • Disclaimer says:

    Excellent, incisive article. I’d love to see more by EM Jones on the Unz Review.

  56. Emslander says:

    I attended ND for my freshman year. I’m from a small Midwestern town that had very traditional Catholic schools and parishes. I had assumed that ND was the next logical step in the process of becoming a responsible adult Catholic. It wasn’t.

    I left and attended the big land grant University in my state to graduation. The education in the public university was of a much higher quality and the access to religious support and ritual was just as good as it had been when I was growing up.

    I think EMJ said that ND is a third-rate institution. He’s correct. It’s a third-rate institution with a world class propaganda operation surrounding it.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  57. A lot of opinions here but no mention by anyone here as to how many children were fathered and raised!

    • Replies: @Chriss
  58. This question is like one of those Venn diagrams. Nothing is all inclusive. Many of the pioneers of abortion rights were Jews, along with many of the female leading feminists Many abortion doctors like Morgenthaler were Jews and like that one named Bernard Slepian who was assassinated up in Buffalo NY. But the Orthodox Jews do not generally support abortion, and they are almost as bad as hiding their women as are the Muslims. Like the Amish and other sects they often have large families. Culturally speaking, and that includes birth control and abortion and women’s rights Muslims and Orthodox Jews are very very similar…but that is seldom talked about. That is like a cognitive dissonance issue that causes internal pain to discuss. The other issue is race: I suspect secretly that one reason some people support abortion is so that black women can have them. And Black women do have them in droves at a higher rate than any other race…the Orientals having almost none. White people say: these women would have 5 to 10 out of wedlock kids each .. in their lifetime and that would necessitate even more welfare and prisons and endless amounts of police and social service expenditures., let the women get rid of the kids. Ditto that for the tons of trailer trash white trash…who needs those kids. What I resent is the upper middle class white woman who knocks off an aspiring great contribution to our future society. The white race needs more children. If you look up there in Quebec Canada those Frenchies are playing a very dangerous game. They whine and complain about their language and French rights ( for 400 years) but they are now almost having no kids, when they used to have 5 or 6 easily. The men are now total hen pecked wimps, the women are spoilt brats obsessed with materialism, legally a woman has to keep her maiden name now and the Catholic religion which was once so strong up there is now held in total contempt. Blacks and other immigrants are coming in in droves and none of them wants to speak French. Quebec is a mini example of committing suicide.

  59. Tucker says:
    @Prof Watson

    “The Negro abortion rate is 4x that of EuroAmericans. Many support abortion for this reason.”

    Anyone who bothers to keep a sharp eye on the FBI/Justice Department’s Uniform Crime Statistics data and on the statistics on the multiple generational welfare and social entitlement parasitism that has become a deeply ingrained sense of entitlement by blacks and every other non-white minority group – would have to be seriously mentally insane to believe that the USA would be a much better place to live if the millions of black and non-white babies had not been aborted and who would have grown up and added to the crime and welfare dependency issues that are already tearing this nation apart.

    So, yes. I support abortion for blacks and for minorities 100 percent. Where I draw the line on abortion is exclusive to White females. The White birth rate is below replacement levels and this is true for almost all historic White nations. If you are White and you are a strong believer in the right of White European people to live in societies where they have self-rule, self-governance and wish to not become subjugated to being ruled over, oppressed, discriminated against, exploited, terrorized and eventually ethnically cleansed by non-white races who hate and despise Whites – then, you have to be on the side of pro-life for White babies.

    This is the #1`reason why jews are so fanatically obsessed with keeping abortion legal and common. They do not wish to see White couples producing White babies. This impedes their desire to genocide Whites and render us extinct. It’s also why they use their media control to push race mixing between Whites and blacks or any other non-white race. Reducing the birth of White babies, again. Ditto for the jewish promotion of homosexuality, lesbianism, tranny freakism, genital mutilation, etc. Reducing or preventing the birth of White babies.

    One caveat. For White females who are raped by blacks or by other non-whites, or who are victims of incest, I would allow abortions in those cases.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Stripes Duncan
  60. @Ray Caruso

    Venomous snakes aren’t as aggressive.

  61. anarchyst says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Roman Catholicism was poisoned by the changes wrought by the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”. The greatest damage to the Church was not necessarily the Protestantizing of Catholic ritual, but was the declaration that jews were not to be held responsible for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ and that Catholics should defer to (((them))) as jews were to be considered “our elder brothers”.
    Roman Catholicism’s greatest error was in not separating the Old Testament from the New Testament. The Old Testament should be used as a “guide” on jewish (mis)behavior–how NOT to conduct one’s life. According to the Old Testament, jews were always straying from the “straight and narrow” and had to be “reminded” from time-to-time that (((they))) had to behave themselves.
    Thankfully, unlike Protestantism, the Catholic Church does not subscribe to “sola scriptura” (stating that the Bible is to be considered the inerrant inspired “word of God”.
    SSPX and other Catholic organizations may just be the saving grace for Roman Catholicism. While “Novus Ordo” parishes are floundering, there is a considerable resurgence in Catholicism in SSPX parishes.

  62. @Chriss


    After reading your post, at first, I set myself on refuting point by point what you wrote. Three lines into my reply, I had a second thought, I deleted what I wrote and decided that that the most appropriate answer was just one word: bollocks.

    • Replies: @Chriss
  63. anarchyst says:

    Your statement:

    There is no European culture without Christianity, and Christianity is based on the Jewish Bible and comes from Christ, who was a Jew. Therefore, anti-Semites are very often also anti-Christians, not realizing that they are undercutting the foundations of the culture they want to defend.

    …is incorrect on its face.

    Jesus Christ was of the Essene sect, a minor jewish sect which espoused Christian-like principles, apart from the dominant Pharisaic sect of the day.

    I am one Roman Catholic who is PROUD to be considered “anti-semitic” due to my recognizing that, from a spiritual standpoint jews ARE the “enemy”. Keep in mind that most European jews are not “semites” at all, have no connections to the middle east and should be considered “fake” jews.

    I cringe when I hear well-meaning people talk about out judeo-Christian heritage.
    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    The god of judaism is a vengeful god, totally unlike the merciful and welcoming God of Christianity.

    Christianity welcomes ALL, regardless of nationality or social status, not true of judaism.

    Sad to say, even the present-day (post-Vatican II ecumenical council) Catholic church has bought into absolving the jews for Jesus Christ’s murder.

    As is the case, even today, the jews got others, the Romans to do their dirty work for them, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

    How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ, and call for his execution (by others, of course, that is the Jewish way)?

    It makes absolutely no sense at all.

    Jews have no respect for Christianity, for Jesus Christ or Mary, his mother, who are both honored as Prophets in Islam, but instead, Jews spit on hearing their names and do the same while passing a Christian of any kind or a Christian Church in Israel. They have no respect for Christians or any other religion.

    Using the “Old Testament” for “laws” is wrong. Yes, the Ten Commandments are a good guide which proscribes certain behaviors, but the rest of mosaic law relies on a vindictive, vengeful “god” to exact “punishment” on “his people”.

    That my work fine for jews, as they have their supremacist “Talmud” to rely on, but “for the rest of us”, it won’t wash.

    Judaism is an insular belief system that shuns outsiders, prohibits proselytization, and promotes a form of supremacy, relegating all gentiles (non-jews) to the status of livestock-subhumans with souls, only to be used for the advancement and benefit of jews.

    In fact, slavery (of goyim) is still condoned and encouraged in the jewish Talmud.

    In addition, the jewish Talmud condones pedophilia, allowing lecherous old jews to rape children as long as they are “three years and a day” of age.

    The barbaric practice of circumcision (male genital mutilation) is also suspect, the mohel fellating the infant after the “deed is done” passing on (who knows what) STDs to the infant. Sick…

    In fact, every jewish “holiday” (holy day) is based on the celebration of genocide and destruction of gentiles.

    Our present troubles are a result of a jewish cabal taking over political decisions in our nominally “multicultural” country.

    Tying Judaism to Christianity was a clever trick used by the jews to “cement” their claim to the “land of Israel” and of the covenant, to which I reply, “God is not a real estate agent”.

    Jews rejected the covenant when they murdered Jesus Christ. Their covenant with (their) God was then “null and void”.

    It is the flawed Schofield translation of the Bible that elevated jews to the status of Christianity’s “elder brothers”, which was then reinforced by the Catholic (flawed) “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” in the 1960s.

    • Agree: Vitez Rafael
    • Replies: @Chriss
    , @Anon
  64. hillaire says:

    ‘jews’ own your governments and print your money..and without those advantages and the powers it bestows.. all that is left of ‘jews’ are whining screeching self entitled mid wit hypocrites..(most ‘jews’ are narcissists)… with a propensity for yapping merde..

    This ‘jews’ reasoning couldn’t survive serious critique and that’s because its argument is merely a collection of (highly destructive) memes inserted into Goyim consciousness by the so called ‘jew’ media (and of course captured academia) with ‘jew’ interests and the aggregation of more power for ‘jews’ at its heart … all enforced by the money powers grip on whitey’s societies..and the power it has been enabled with to ‘punish’…(jew culture is just a compendium of punishment)..

    Testicles need to be found and falsehoods confronted… and of course traitors hanged…

  65. Z-man says:

    I went to a Catholic college in the New York metro area and while prestigious to a degree, I found it lacking in many courses. It still served its purpose but I was not as well prepared as I should have been for the ‘outside’ world IMHO.
    My son who went to public school barely made it out of high school but years later he discovered ‘academia’. He was behind the 8th Ball and started his college journey at Manhattan Community College.
    Well, I was pleasantly surprised when they made him take a whole year of remedial courses to get him up to snuff, and it was cheap.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  66. @Old Brown Fool

    “ You cannot get ahead in life without a university degree”

    “You cannot get ahead in life sitting on your ass doing nothing without a university degree”

    There. Fixed it for you.

  67. I cannot wrap my mind around the concept of Jews at Notre Dame. What are they doing there? If we had a Muslim Saint University*** would they be trying to infiltrate that one as well?

    ***Apologies I do not know the names of any real Muslim saints.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  68. anonymous[202] • Disclaimer says:

    The word soup you have spilled into our laps does nothing – nothing! – to take away the fact that your precious, that is, abortion, kills human beings.

    You cannot deny on scientific, rational grounds that your precious kills human beings.

    You are anti-human.

  69. @Prof Watson

    Maybe now would be the time for churches to pull their support and separate themselves from churches with false prophets. At what point will the church pull their support for all institutions that go against teachings of God? Hitler isn’t here today. when does the church take a stand for their people, and when do the people follow their lead and pull away from any and all that go against their teaching? Will they pull away from the Biden’s and Pelosi’s, Globalism, invasions of their church and country? I’m not holding my breath. If people have the power, they certainly don’t use it to extricate themselves from all that goes against their faiths their hearts their children. You separated the church from the garbage of the state, be a part of it, build the church back better the way God wants it. There are no more excuses.

  70. Just for once I wish women would take their birth control along with managing their menstrual cycles. Then I wish the life crowd would like to address the problems of the living, which ironically tend to be a result of women who don’t manage their birth control and lifers that want those save babies to die for Israel. OK that is a simplification of it all, but I am so sick and tired of the sit in spin arguments which in reality enable the elite to do what they want.

    Also wasn’t the Catholics of old that wanted their cathedrals but not Gentile a usury, so they used their kings to cut deals with the Jewish usury masters. Hence we got stuck with them. OK that too is simplification of things, but I maintain none of those buildings or holy wars were paid for by any proceeds the kings collected from the peasants. However I do thank the Catholics of old, who fought off the Muslim invaders, which the Jews of old approve of. Bit strange.

    As for Jews, abortion to the day of birth deals with all their misfit and inbred spawn they produce. Odd when you think about it due to them being God’s chosen people. Shouldn’t they be the healthiest and prettiest human specimens on earth? Funny how Catholics do better in those two respects, and they use to be fairly in tribe breeders as well.

  71. @Anonymous

    The Indo-European peoples turn out many leaders who are brutal and extremely selfish. Some groups (all Germanic tribes for example) turn out far more of those monsters per capita. But the masses of Indo-European peoples are fundamentally decent, their weaknesses in the world being that they have a whole lot trust and empathy. That means that their now monster leaders and the most duplicitous and criminally violent groups con them and make them feel guilty.

    Anglo-Zionist Empire exists not just because of Jews but Jews an elite Anglo-Saxons are two types of vicious monsters that together serve as Satan’s right hand on earth.

  72. @anarchyst

    The ‘Protestantizing of Catholic ritual’ went hand in hand with the rest of it. They are inextricable.

    • Agree: Pierre de Craon
    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  73. @mulga mumblebrain

    That’s absurd and easily shown too be false when you know the people. For example, the most forcefully anti-abortion pole are very rarely ever friendly toward Neocons, who both worship Anglo-Zionist Empire and really like abortion.

    • Agree: Pierre de Craon
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  74. Anonymous[250] • Disclaimer says:

    This is a classic case of divide et impera polarization to keep the subject population fighting each other instead of their command structure.

    Rockefeller and Ziegler naturally seize on the most polarizing special case – let’s you and him fight about little Mary’s silent scream. Abortion is one inferior means to an end. Any competent religious institution would step back from the nuts and bolts of first or last resorts to the overarching objectives that can gain consensus.

    The Catholic doctrine here is human rights. And as the curia will tell you, the right to life is indivisible with all other human rights. The relevant indivisible right, CEDAW Article 16§1(e), affirms for women and men “the same rights to decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of their children.” Including maybe zero, maybe later, but those aren’t kleptocrat rights or Jew rights, they’re Mom’s rights and Dad’s equal rights. If there’s any residual confusion about the intent of this provision, CEDAW has provided interpretive guidance in General Comments 21 and 29.

    By fixating everybody on an extreme case, the kleptocrat Rockefeller and ADL’s Jew supremacists have accomplished quite a lot. They’ve got you fighting over one subordinate clause of one section of one article of one of the nine core human rights instruments. They’re still fucking women over, they’re still fucking men over, in a panoply of ways you never notice because they’re pitted you like dogs over a single extreme issue.

    Ziegler’s Jew neurosis is amusing but inconsequential. He’s obviously at Notre Dame because he couldn’t even get into Penn, and there’s nothing sadder than a dumb Jew. Jew supremacist entryism is focused on the commanding heights, and, well, that’s not Notre Dame. Except for maybe preeminent leadership in football brain injuries.

    This is one more example of American incapacity in pacific dispute resolution, induced by an authoritarian state as a strategy of tension. By distorting and subverting human rights, your state and its parasitic elites can fuck you over. Bone up on your Cat’lic doctrine and you’ll see.

  75. ld says:
    @Old Brown Fool

    I hired Hispanics
    There was no job they wouldn’t do or hour they would not work
    always… the job got done

    They often worked as families… after the kids got home from school they all cleaned offices together.
    I felt sorry for them until one day I had to drive one of my sick workers home
    I only wish I had such a fine house… paid in full
    their kids earned their college money cleaning with their parents.. no debt

  76. werpor says:
    @Stripes Duncan

    There are no words to express one’s utter disgust with a society that would contemplate such a thing as the proposed law you cite #123467 … I cannot fathom legitimizing, in law, killing one’s baby, or fathom a society that would condone it. Sheer madness has gripped men’s and women’s minds.

    Every so often masses of men, and women, behave as though hypnotized. Rather than thinking independently they lose their minds. Did they ever have minds capable of independent thinking? I doubt it! From an early age the young are immersed in a cultural bath ill disposed toward adult behaviour or encouraging it. People, of what should be a mature age, have been collectivized; forever doomed to copying received behaviour. People seldom have discussions. They have opinions which they hang on to with a desperation born of their programming; countervailing ideas for them should not exist.

    People are behaving like rats in a cage. Rats crowded in a cage with nothing except routine go mad. They turn on one another; scratching, biting, bullying, one or two eating more than the others, while some are deprived altogether. Many female rats in such conditions are unable to carry pregnancy to full term. If they successfully deliver a litter they tend to fall short in their maternal functions. Among the males the behavioural disturbances range from sexual deviation to cannibalism, and from frenetic behaviour to pathological withdrawal.

    Humans are suggestible, thus they believe many things they have been programmed to receive. If Jews have been led to believe they are chosen by God to rule over a destroy the Goyim, the Goyim have been led to believe they should be submissive; turn the other cheek, trust automatically the written or spoken word, or the messaging some talking head on TV is spouting — of course, mirroring the method employed in their schools; memorizing and regurgitating the received. Their schooling rewards passive receptivity and punishes active mentation. Politicians lie with impunity, because the population, never sussing out they have been deceived and deprived their entire lives, automatically believe. It offends people deeply if you suggest they have been brainwashed. They never notice either, to what extent their emotions are limited to getting their own way, or, to feeling deprived.

    Any possibility of people behaving contrary to the ways and means of the masses has been weaned out of them. H.G. Wells wrote The Time Machine in 1895. The novel follows the adventures of a hypothetical Time Traveller who journeys into the future. Humanity has divided into peaceful and passive vegetarians, the Eloi, and the carnivorous Morlocks. The Morlocks eat the Eloi.

    Indeed, this is a disgusting notion. When the Morlocks are hungry they sound a loud siren. The Eloi drop whatever they are doing and walk hypnotically towards the sound of the siren. They have been programmed to walk in a trance to their deaths.

    Hypnotism today takes upwards of 20 years. Young men and women pay thousands of dollars to be thoroughly brainwashed. They believe what they believe, motivated by the promise of concordance, and reward. In truth, a disgusting notion!

  77. Getaclue says:
    @Kinky Friedman

    Vatican 2 was a revolution pulled off by infiltrated Masons.

    The Police raid on the P2 Lodge in Italy produced documents signed by various Cardinals and Bishops (Masons with code names) documenting their various destruction of the Church on behalf of the Masons (Satanists).

    One of these actually picked all Bishops for over a decade and nearly all picked were infiltrated in homosexuals/Satanist types like Cardinal Bernadin–most are still in power today.

    Archbishop Bugnini who replaced the Mass God gave the Saints for us with his Masonic NOrdo “mass” was a Mason–he left a briefcase full of documents behind at a meeting that blew his cover and as a result was exiled at the height of his power to Iran. Knowing this the Church still kept his Masonic “mass” no doubt due to the power of so many other infiltrated in Masons/Satanists. As the Catholic Church goes the World goes–look around if you’re not blind.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Pierre de Craon
  78. The JEW QUESTION explained:

    Jews form a nation within a nation everywhere they reside. Can Jews ever be considered to be part of the larger nation in which they reside when they are genetically and culturally predisposed to put the interests of the Jew Nation over and above the interests of the larger nations in which they reside?

  79. @Anon

    Talmudic Judaism (aka Pharisaism) is the snake in the garden of Eden America.

    Its philosophy has permeated every facet of our society and destroyed the very meaning of life.

    • Thanks: DCThrowback
  80. @anarchyst

    Roman Catholicism’s greatest error was allowing sodomizers in the Sacristy.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  81. Dutch Boy says:

    Abortionophilia is not confined to left-wing Jews but also to the right-wing variety (e.g., David Cole and Ilana Mercer), so it is truly a religious/cultural imperative rather than merely a political stance. It is the logical consequence of the sexual revolution created by Jews, as is the transmania of the moment.

  82. Ace says:

    Hence the First Amendment that prohibited Congress from making laws respecting an establishment of religion or the free exercise thereof and the absence of anything else in the Constitution that prohibited the establishment of religion in the states.

    Those irreligious Enlightenment fraudsters!

  83. Emslander says:

    The formation of Christian’s consciousness is still a mysterious process. Notre Dame has this aura that is arresting or was, at one time. It gets into your soul. I have to admit that.

    I’m not sure current public university educations are as good as or as neutral as mine was in the 1960’s and 1070’s. Probably not, but secularism isn’t always harmful.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  84. Anonymous[205] • Disclaimer says:

    “The carefully worked out modus vivendi on abortion at Notre Dame ended when Roe v Wade got overturned and 140 Jewish organizations announced that abortion was “a fundamental Jewish value.””

    It’s a pity Jews don’t practice what they preach, otherwise God’s green earth would be devoid of that cursed race!

  85. anarchyst says:
    @Liberty Mike

    You are correct. I make no excuses for the “lavender lobby” in the Catholic Church.

    That being said, the homosexual component in the Catholic Church is dwarfed by that of other faiths.

    The rate of incidence for sex crimes is about 1 %.
    That is Far less than that of Protestants, Jewish Rabbis, Boy Scout troopmasters or certainly Public School administrators. The leader in sex crimes against children is usually inter family related i.e. step fathers, friends, uncles etc.
    Jews made a crisis, than brought suit against the centralized Catholic Church and in so doing, forever tarnished the clergy who was their archnemesis.

    Free Republic

    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?
    August 14th, 2009 | Kevin Roeten


    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?

    It turns out pedophilia is an incorrect term, and Catholics aren’t responsible for most of it.

    Shockingly, AP breaks out of their typical liberal mold and reports insurance companies shed light on extent of sex abuse in Protestant churches, that sexual abuse of minors has been rampant. But in their statement, they indirectly say members of the Catholic Church are not the majority abusers.

    AP discusses the raw numbers from three companies that insure the majority of protestant churches in America (Church Mutual, Guide One, and Brotherhood Mutual), and typically receive 260 reports/yr of people under 18 being sexually abused. Compare that with ~228 credible accusations/yr against Catholic clerics since 1950 (documented abuse records).

    Together with that information, it is known that the Catholic Church greatly outnumbers any specific Protestant denomination, and the data for Protestant churches is available only for the last seven years. Ever since the first sexual abuse cases had been reported, Catholics have had requirements: 1) police background check done on all volunteers,including priests, 2) a second person be present at all religious functions, and 3) all personnel involved with minors must take routine checks with Protecting God’s Children.

    Without a doubt, sexual abuse of a minor is one of the most despicable crimes and sins that man can perpetrate. But predators seem to thrive in an atmosphere where the base congregation is one of the most trusted organizations that exist.

    Philip Jenkins, in his 1996 book Pedophiles and Priests, [[link edited for length]], looked at the problem objectively and dispassionately. Jenkins (who is not Catholic) found that true pedophilia is extremely rare, and perhaps more common among Protestant clergy, and is even more common among married laymen.

    He found that in most sexual abuse cases (under the age of consent), the behavior is actually a variety of homosexuality. This sexual attraction with very young men that combine the charm of boyishness with sexual maturity is actually called ephebophilia. Pedophilia is really a psychiatric term meaning sexual interest in children below the age of puberty.

    The worst sex crimes against children is in the Jewish communities and protestant churches.
    Tomasi was not reserved with criticism either and citing data published by the daily Christian Science Monitor, which was founded a hundred years ago by the Christian Science Church, said that the Catholic Church cleaned its house, Jutarnji List writes.
    According to their figures the majority of the US child abuse cases happens in the Protestant churches and Jewish communities, says Tomasi.


    A Penn State historian, Philip Jenkins, has done an in depth research of pedophilia and sexual abuse among the clergy and has come up with some rather eye opening facts. It seems that while 1.7 percent of Catholic clergy have been guilty of pedophilia (or sexual abuse particularly of boys), a whopping TEN percent of Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia!

    This is all the more interesting, notes Jenkins, since there has been NO media term Pastor Pedophilia coined at all!

    Jenkins theorizes that the media, proving the point of the necessity of sexual promiscuity, overemphasizes any instance of pedophilia found among the Catholic clergy since it can use this to criticize the entire idea of celibacy. But it is interesting that the NON Celibate Protestant ministers have a MUCH GREATER problem with it than the celibate Catholic priests!

    Protestant pastor pedophilia is not within the frame of our social constructionists as Jenkins calls the media:

    In the 1980s, [Pastor] Leyva had abused perhaps one hundred boys in several Southern states, but few of us ever learned of it. Leyva had the distinction of being a Pentecostal minister and was, therefore, not within the frame of those who were busy constructing reality. The same is true of the three brothers, all Baptist ministers, who were charged with child molestation in the 1990s; the public learned little about this highly unusual series of cases because it was not deemed worthy of dissemination by those fixated on Catholic scandals. [1]

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  86. Alden says:

    So you’d graciously allow White women raped by blacks and non Whites to abort the spawn of criminal retards. What about the spawn of criminal retard Whites? And the exactly how are you going to accomplish your goal?

    There’s a very high rate of black and other non White men who commit rapes. Are you going to set up a nationwide tracking service for rapes resulting in pregnancy? FYI ignorant moron. When raped women are treated in the emergency center they are offered the medicine “ morning after pill “ that makes sure any fertile egg doesn’t implant itself in the uterine wall. Ignorant celibate moron. Bet you don’t even know the approximately 36 days of the year a woman can get pregnant

    The more I read the comments the more contempt and disdain I have for the men of UNZ.

    Even more contemptible than the men of UNZ attitude towards women is your attitude towards White victims of crime.

    According to the men of UNZ it’s always the White victims fault. For living in a city that blacks live in. For working any other job than an 8/30 to 5pm office coolie job. For working different shifts in the enormous medical retail restaurant entertainment sector of the economy. For working a 2-10 pm or 3-11 pm shift. For not earning enough to afford both rent and a car. Thus having to use public transit. For going outside at 5/30 am. Or being outside after dark. In December when Sunset is 4/20 pm and it’s full dark at 4/40 pm.

    And stop using the words male and female. That’s Ebonics. Comes from the fact that police jail and prison reports use the words male and female instead of the correct civilized White term man and woman Blacks use the words male and female because so many of them are in and out of prison.

    • Replies: @Tucker
    , @Tucker
  87. Z-man says:

    I went to Catholic grammar school, high school and college and I was quite ignorant of the New Testament. Some of it was my fault but a lot had to do with Church teachings right after Vatican II.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  88. Alden says:

    Thanks interesting comment explains a lot.

  89. Ok. Just as peyote is, or at least was last time I heard, legal for Navaho to use in religious ceremonies and illegal for everyone else; make abortion legal for Jews only. A very simple solution. If the Jews don’t even consider the rest of us to be human, why bother to prohibit them from butchering their future in the womb?

  90. HT says:

    My once rigid position against abortion is becoming fluid. I think I would support free abortions for any black, Jew, or Mexican that wants one while banning abortion for Whites.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  91. Upiuer says:

    Abortion is the only reason why the black population had remained stuck at 12%.

    Abortion opponents are cuckservative Evangelicals. Evangelicals were like William Jennings Bryan-a bunch of borderline communists-until they pretended to become conservative under Ronald Reagan.

    Evangelicals are so much against the Jews that their second biggest political priority (after abortion) is getting the ancient Jewish Old Testament creation story taught in schools rather than evolution. And their third biggest political priority is more aid to Israel.

    • Thanks: Alden
  92. @LaraLara

    LaraLara’s comment combines amorality, stupidity, and irrationality in what is, at least in my experience, a form that I had no idea they could be combined in. Is this what people mean when they refer to progress?

    I suppose LaraLara embodies what Biden, Pelosi, and Schumer would call a new way of thinking for a new America.

  93. @Emil Nikola Richard

    Apologies I do not know the names of any real Muslim saints.

    No apology needed. If you did know such names, you’d be the first!

  94. Housewife says:

    Can a weak man subjugate a woman? Men are also supporting abortion because “it’s a woman’s body.” They willingly submit to the woman.

    The Jews also control sitcoms, social media, movies, pornography. They curate lies. How many men are addicted to porn? No ability to deny self and use their will to control their animalistic desires. How many men buy into the impossible fake beauty standards pushed forth and impose them on women? How many men embody the bumbling fool of the sitcoms?

    So many things had to fall first.

  95. Dutch Boy says:

    In my younger days, I knew a number of young white women at my work and in my social circle. Many of them were attractive and intelligent and quite a few had had abortions. Many of them never married and those who did were often childless or had one child. Abortion seems to be create an anti-natal syndrome (or augments one already present). Anyone who supports abortion rights is basically supporting the Jewish assault on our civilization.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  96. @Zachary Smith

    You read Unz Review, but you use Rational Wiki as a source?

    Fwiw, EMJ’s testimony on his firing is that he was pro-life and that this in some sense was unacceptable to a university that is purportedly Catholic. Assuming his story is true, I don’t think Rational Wiki’s telling of the situation is a good representation. The Catholic position is that direct abortion is always wrong. What position is more “extreme” than that? If a purportedly Catholic school doesn’t accept that, then they’re the ones not holding the Catholic position. So the RW line doesn’t make sense.

    • Agree: Emslander
    • Replies: @Zachary Smith
  97. 4justice says:

    Please don’t confuse the ideal held up for human sexuality by the Church for what men (and women) end up doing. Catholics believe we are all fallen and that it is only with the Grace of God and the wisdom of Catholic teaching that we can hope to avoid the many pitfalls and snares those who hope to enslave us set for us (sexual liberation, destruction of the families, dividing women and men with sexual liberation, then feminism, then MGTOW, debt slavery, day care, ending the concept of the family wage, contraception, abortion, IVF, surrogacy, pride in non-procreative sexual unions, war on the very concept of what is a woman or a man, cancel culture which is embracing the concept of Jewish vengeance and normalizing censorship, technological escapes and worship of technology enabling full spectrum surveillance and the end to privacy and interference with our humanity on a very fundamental level to name a few.) When we fail, we do have access to the sacrament of confession, but it is only valid if we are sincere and honest in our intent to not repeat the sin. Sometimes the traps are extremely coercive such as a vaccine mandate which required people to prostitute their bodily sovereignty to retain their jobs or continue their education. But I still feel it was a sin to comply. That is my view. I am not great scholar, you don’t have to agree with me.

    But what I will say, is E Michael Jones is a Catholic man who has taken the time to help Catholics understand the nature of the mine field we are in the midst of, who set it up and why, and how staying in unity with the Church and accessing the Catholic sacraments – despite massive corruption in the Church – can help us to live a good life that can serve our families, our communities and our society. He clearly is one of a small number of people these days who fears God more than the Jews. That is inspiring. May God protect him and help all of us to see through the many traps and psyops so that we might be brave enough to protect our children and leave them a society where it is still allowed to worship God. May God Bless you and may you find deeply spiritual people worthy of trust and respect to be in community with.

  98. Tucker says:

    Do us all a big favor and shove your sick and degenerate ‘pro-nouns’ bullshyte up your white race hating stinking ass. Which I suspect is a self-chosen ass.

    • Replies: @Anon
  99. @Pierre de Craon

    Biden and Pelosi are both Catholics, neither of whom has been thrown out of a church for their support for institutions that support world wide abortions. They don’t denounce abortion. Pelosi is Italian and Biden is Irish.
    There is nothing wrong with no law, do you supposed christians need a law to stop them from getting an abortion? What God’s law is not enough for them? Does God forgive mistakes? If God forgives mistakes, then who are you?
    Will the Pope denounce the United Nations and take no more part in their soul ruining activities? Will the catholics ever stop being democrats? Considering you wrote of nothing specific I guess I’ll end this here.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  100. Anon[176] • Disclaimer says:

    That’s morally absurd; you are your brother’s keeper, and to be mum about the legality of killing unborn humans, who in the case of fetuses suffer as much as a born person would who is being dismembered and/or poisoned to death, is immoral both as a secular ethics and a Christian one. If it causes consternation among the “pro-choice” Catholics, well too bad.

  101. Anon[295] • Disclaimer says:

    When I chose the University of Notre Dame, I anticipated some adjustment for a Jew attending arguably the world’s most Catholic university. The Catholic identity at Notre Dame is unmistakable when there’s a crucifix in every classroom, chapels in each dormitory, and an active Catholic student population. Now, Notre Dame has a right to embrace its Catholic identity, and its commitment is admirable. I also don’t regret my decision to attend this university, as Catholic education has only affirmed my Jewish faith and pride in my Jewish identity. Still, for non-Catholic students, there’s a necessary adaptation to the campus environment….

    Blake S. Ziegler
    University of Notre Dame
    Address Email: [email protected]
    Phone: (504) 715-0756

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @DCThrowback
  102. @Pierre de Craon

    Oh, and one more thing, You can’t impose God’s will when God gave everyone free will, all of that not to be confused with the laws of the government which is separate from the church.

  103. 4justice says:
    @Stripes Duncan

    I smell a baby-killer.

    This is an ad hominem argument that serves to shut down discussion. What is served? If you are wrong, you only look foolish to the poster. If you are right, and the poster has not managed to seek forgiveness and is tortured by this, then you will hurt her, but not help her to consider what the Church has to offer as a way forward. Same for other women and men involved in past abortions. If she has been through an abortion, but has come to terms with it, your comment still does not address her valid concerns about seeking a man who is actually able to live the Catholic teaching around sexuality in this very degraded society. I think we will do better to champion the proper respect for the sacred in life in all stages with love and charity. And not only that, we will at the same time undermine those who seek to divide us even at the level of relations between men and women. If you are really just an IDF unit 8200 member trying to sow anger and division, then sure, keep doing what you are doing.

    • Replies: @Stripes Duncan
  104. @Kinky Friedman

    The ‘Protestantizing of Catholic ritual’ went hand in hand with the rest of it. They are inextricable.

    Indeed they are. You remind me of what Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said when he saw the text of the Novus Ordo Missae shortly before it was formally proclaimed by Paul VI: “It is Protestant and is designed to make Protestants.”

    A decade later (November 1979), in a statement part of which may be found at YouTube, the archbishop declared, “One can fairly say without exaggeration that most of these masses are sacrilegious acts which pervert the Faith by diminishing it.”

    Anyone interested in seeing how Archbishop Lefebvre advanced with care and caution from hopefulness that some fragments of piety might be found in the New Mass to a conviction that it must be avoided at all cost will profit from reading this brief outline. Recommended.

  105. @HT

    And, in some circumstances, such as yours, it should be made retrospective.

  106. @anarchyst

    In the USA, girls are two to three times more likely to be abused than boys. It is an abomination inflicted by gays and straights. And, here in Austfailia, a Royal Commission showed that much of the abuse was not sexual, but psychological and pure sadism.Moreover, paedophilia in the Church goes back centuries, and probably millennia.

  107. @Getaclue

    You have given an excellent and concise description of what went on. The only alteration I’d make would be slight—the addition of two words to your first sentence: “Vatican 2 was a revolution pulled off by infiltrated Masons and Jews.”

    In an important book written almost sixty years ago, Judaism and the Vatican, Léon de Poncins documents beyond any reasonable doubt how profound the influence of both Jews and Freemasons was in the highest reaches of the Church in the half century prior to the Council. Even Augustin Cardinal Bea, the closest adviser to John XXIII, was a clandestine Jew.

    • Replies: @DCThrowback
  108. @Kinky Friedman

    I said ‘many’ not ‘all’. English not your first tongue?

  109. @Prof Watson

    Is there any way we can double the black abortion rate?

  110. @Kinky Friedman

    Vatican 2 is an ongoing asteroid strike. But many are rejecting it in favour of return to authentic Catholicism in the form of the Tridentine Latin Mass. SSPX, FSSP and others are growing quickly.

  111. Chriss says:

    but Matthew 1:1-17

    Why should we dialogue with Jews? We will achieve nothing, and we may even lose a lot. After all, Jews are not really the heirs of the Old Testament and biblical Judaism, because they base their faith on the Kabbalah and the Talmud, which is a deeply unbiblical and, moreover, anti-Christian tradition. We don’t need a dialogue because we won’t learn anything from them about our biblical roots, they’ll only confuse our heads.

  112. Dumbo says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    I was talking about words and meanings. Do women die in abortions?

    First, women dying in (illegal?) abortions is extremely rare today. I think it was always rare (it’s much more possible to die during childbirth).

    Second, they shouldn’t be aborting anyway.

    There’s no need for abortion. Sluts should just close their legs, so-called sexual liberation was a disaster for women. For men, too, but probably more for women.

    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain
  113. Anon[295] • Disclaimer says:

    Abortion is NOT a Jewish Sacrament!

    Orthodox Rabbi Yitzchak Breitowitz can explain to you that Judaism generally prohibits abortion for Jewish women and completely prohibits it for Gentiles, in conformity with Catholic Canon Law:

    Rabbi Breitowitz’s email address is: [email protected]

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  114. Al Liguori says: • Website

    Odd that an alleged foe of the Jews would pal around with Opus JuDei. Escriv(b)a was a Marrano, Kabbalist, homosexual, and servant of the synagogue. His lineage is no less subversive.

    It’s almost as hypocritical as claiming the post-Vatican2 claimants are true Popes while opposing, for example, “Pope” Benedict who quite clearly stated in his remission of the excommunications that the SSPX was NOT in schism.

    Woe to them that are of a double heart and to wicked lips, and to the hands that do evil, and to the sinner that goeth on the earth two ways. –Ecclesiasticus 2:14

    No man can serve two masters. For either he will hate the one, and love the other: or he will sustain the one, and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon. –Matthew 6:24

    That with one mind, and with one mouth, you may glorify God and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. –Romans 15:6

    The double-minded man is inconstant in all his ways. -James 1:8

  115. @Stripes Duncan

    I’m not a roe supporter, but a no law supporter up to a certain number of weeks. If the woman in question was raped, then the man should have no rights to the child, period. If the woman chooses not to keep the child that is her choice. That would be my opinion on that. But I am not a court of law.
    A man has no choice unless the woman chooses to involve him, and most men don’t want the children of their rape victims anyway. That takes a really sick and twisted individual to do that. Make a woman have a child so the rapist can abuse the child and his other first victim.

    • Replies: @Stripes Duncan
  116. Chriss says:
    @Passing By

    heard about?

    Is it permissible to eat the testicles of halal-slaughtered animals, such as goats for example?

    Praise be to Allah.


    It is permissible to eat the testicles of halal-slaughtered animals, as there is no evidence to suggest that it is not permissible, and the basic principle is that things are permissible.

    It says in al-Mudawwanah:

    That which may be included with meat, such as fat, liver, stomach, heart, lungs, spleen, kidneys, neck, testicles, feet, head and the like, comes under the same ruling as meat. End quote.

    • Replies: @Passing By
  117. Anon[404] • Disclaimer says:

    This comes back to the last article on the dumbos graduating from University. A Jew attending a Catholic University, A Catholic going to a Moslem school. A black going to an all white school……..

    I thought people went to school to learn. I was wrong ! They attend to protest every stupid thing. Study is secondary and contention a daily sport. Once they start with this nonsense the Administrators should kick them out.

    If you are one religion / race and you dont want to go to or dont like the school where another religion/ race is prevalent then dont fucking go !

    This guy in the photo. Who gives a flying piece of shit whether Catholicism solidifies his Jewishness ?

    Fuck these Hasbaras and their continual dissatisfaction !

  118. Trinity says:
    @Dutch Boy

    It is White women aborting babies that is why Jews and most nigras like Whoopi Goldberg support it.

    Don’t believe bullshit Jew LIES. Take a look around you. Look at all the White women who have only 1-2 kids, look at the ones with no children who are older than 30. Now look at Beaners, worse than even Sheboons. Beaneritas, and Sheboons poop out one kid after another. Fuck (((stats))) like (((11 million invaders))), labeling Beaners, Aye-rab, half breeds as ” white criminals, (((2% of America is Jewish))), blah, blah… Sheboons having abortions is a FAIRY TALE.

  119. @Chriss

    Whether you are a fool or a liar is a matter that, thank heaven, I am not obliged to waste time investigating or analyzing. That you are certainly one or the other or both is, however, past any doubt.

    There is no European culture without Christianity, and Christianity is based on the Jewish Bible and comes from Christ, who was a Jew.

    1) The Bible is not Jewish. The Old Testament was given by God, via His inspired choice and direction, to the Jews, but the Bible’s authority is a function of its godliness, not its Jewishness.* Furthermore, it is the Church founded by Christ that decided which of the writings attributed to Jewish human authors actually had God as their True Author. The New Testament, of course, documents the corporeal life of the God-Made-Man, the Salvation History enacted in His crucifixion, death, and resurrection, and His creation of a New Religion to which all human beings are called and, conjoined with which, His imposition of an Apostolic Mission on the Twelve and their anointed descendants that will last till the end of temporal creation. The human authors of the inspired books of the NT were Jews by birth and blood, but all of them renounced any and all attachment to “religious” or ethnic Judaism in order to serve God according to the dictates given to them by His Son. It was, note well, that very same Son of God who declared adherence to Judaism equivalent to service to God’s enemy, Satan (cf. Jn 8:43–45).

    2) As the Bible is distinctly not Jewish in its essence and spiritual import, neither is Christianity “based on the Jewish Bible.” That claim is a lie of Satanic dimensions. Christianity is based (1) on the direct revelations made to the Twelve while Christ lived on earth and (2) on the divinely inspired teachings and actions of the Twelve after Christ’s Ascension, which must be construed to include both the writing of the New Testamental books and, of even greater significance, the founding of an institutional, hierarchical Church wherein Christ’s Living Presence would be reified till the end of time.

    Therefore, anti-Semites are very often also anti-Christians, not realizing that they are undercutting the foundations of the culture they want to defend.

    Your “therefore” signals your dishonesty—or else your ignorance—loud and clear. You then double down on it by going straight for history’s great lie—namely, that anti-Semitism, if indeed there may be said even to be such a thing, is a concept with moral significance.

    Since Jews and Judaism have no religious or moral standing whatsoever—they themselves admitted as much by discarding the dead cultus of Judaism of Christ’s day and fabricating rabbinic Judaism out of whole cloth circa 7o AD, specifically as a weapon to destroy the religion established by the God that these liars claim they worship—opposition to Jews constitutes, on the contrary, an ipso facto defense of the foundations of Christian culture and civilization, which ought to be understood as encompassing those elements of the pagan and Jewish past that were, so to speak, “Christian in anticipation” in that they were elements of culture and civilization whose concern for divine truth and recognition of immutable laws of nature show what all Christians have always professed: that during all the long centuries prior to the Incarnation, God had never concealed His presence in His creation from anyone with the insight and the desire to find It.

    The rest of your comment is equally mischievous and equally distorted. Suffice to say that its patent point is to repeat the old hasbara lie: “All that we Jews want is what is best for you cattle! Can’t you see that our religion is nothing but an older and better version of yours? Why do you brush us off when we offer you what our ancestor offered Christ after His forty-day fast in the desert: ‘All this I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me’? We offer you love, and you respond with hate. Oh, you goyim!”
    *There is a great deal of wisdom in the old joke “How odd of God to choose the Jews.”

    • Agree: Al Liguori
    • Replies: @Al Liguori
    , @anarchyst
  120. Anon[404] • Disclaimer says:

    Alden wrote:: Even more contemptible than the men of UNZ attitude towards women is your attitude towards White victims of crime.</b

    Alden is a confused know it all hoe. Most of her comments are self righteous and sanctimonious. She lives in a world of make believe where Alden pronounces on what is right and wrong.

    Personally, I believe she is an overweight sweat hog hungry for big meat ! LOL

    Memo to Alden: We are not interested in your opinion. If you are unhappy with the men here fuck off to another site. Then you will be happy and so will we as we will no longer have to read your tedious horse shit. Yeah Alden, shove it up the blow hole !

    • Replies: @Dube
  121. @Anon

    EMJ might say that face epitomizes the spirit of the German word Backpfeifengesicht.

  122. @DCThrowback

    Thanks very much for the link. I used to have the address of a link to the same book that made a smaller demand on a computer’s resources, but I lost it, along with much else, in a big crash about two years ago. That being my fourth or fifth such disaster, I finally began backing stuff up on a thumb drive after the last crash, but unfortunately I am still less than [ahem] religious about doing so.

  123. Al Liguori says: • Website

    Blowback on the Synagogue of Satan has taught them to always leave a straggler or feigned dissenter to allow for plausible deniability. Reform, conservative, and orthodox Judaism all prescribe abortion for Jews and Gentiles. Evidence of the truth of that is voluminous and aggregated here:

    Research leads and content on the other Jewish “sacraments,” pedophilia and sodomy here:

  124. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Pierre de Craon

    “Agree” is an understatement. That comment was an eloquent tour de force penetrating several common (((Satanic))) deceits. God bless you for that!

    More on the truth of all you said:

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  125. @Chriss

    There should be a WTF button in the “agree/disagree/etc” row. You definitely deserve it.

  126. Jones do you realize that the Football program of Noter Dame has subsidized the school for the past 50 years….Mick how many of those players have been white christian or black and was there ever a single Jew? You should comment on that.

  127. @LaraSillyCanadianGoose

    Catholics believe what the Church has always taught, and they think and act in accord with what the Church has always dictated. A handy way to analogize the Church is as a club with rules that members must abide by upon pain of expulsion.

    By their own choice, by their own words, and by their own actions, Biden and Pelosi have made plain that they do not wish to be Catholics; hence, they are not Catholics. Their Italianness or Irishness or gender choice or anything else is of no matter whatsoever. Of course, Biden and Pelosi can characterize themselves however they want. Nonetheless, I know they are liars, and far more important, so does God.

    Are you really so ignorant that you don’t already know these things? Or are you a sorority cow looking for a way pour passer le temps because all of your slutty girlfriends are otherwise engaged? Given your childish need to change your screen name every few minutes, I suspect the latter to be the case.

  128. anarchyst says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    Your comment:

    1) The Bible is not Jewish. The Old Testament was given by God, via His inspired choice and direction, to the Jews, but the Bible’s authority is a function of its godliness, not its Jewishness.*

    …is a typical Protestant doctrine…”sola scriptura” a concept that Catholics do not subscribe to. All “sola scriptura” does is binds the Bible to the jews, and be inference Protestantism.

    MEN wrote the Bible and inserted their own biases, errors and viewpoints into it. Each subsequent translation inserts further biases into it.

    The Bible may have some basis in historical fact but the “inspired word of God” it “ain’t”.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  129. Christianity is a Jewish abortion to begin with. Before the Jew rose to globalist prominence, academia had not just long been shanghaied by the Abrahamic cultism of Christianity’s different brands, mainly the Catholic and Episcopalians/Anglo-Christians; Salamanca, Bologna and the Sorbonne were born as spaces of study of the mythological theology of Jewsus Christ.

    The entities of the terrorist USEUNATO conglomerate were no lands of sanctity and piety before they took their current form. Some dilemma for Christians and Jews joined by the jesuitism of Abrahamic dogma.

    As if the flames of these pointless dicussions needed extra fanning, “Notre Dame” was a Jewess t00.

  130. anarchyst says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    You are correct.
    Catholics do not need a priest or bishop to “excommunicate” them. Catholic beliefs are that Catholics excommunicate themselves by their deeds and actions. Both Pelosi and Biden have excommunicated themselves by their actions.
    If a priest or bishop is aware of their transgressions he can refuse them the sacraments, most commonly the Eucharist.

  131. @Pierre de Craon

    Please be quiet. Just think of my posts as rhetorical.
    Don’t worry about my screen name.

    Oh look some churches didn’t want her to have communion, hard to believe from a catholic church in San Francisco.

    “Nancy Pelosi receives COMMUNION at Catholic church in Georgetown after Archbishop of San Francisco banned her over her ‘extreme’ abortion views The California”

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  132. @Z-man

    Some of it was my fault but a lot had to do with Church teachings right after Vatican II.

    Few of us live up to our expectations of ourselves, still fewer to the capacities a higher power has given to us (cf. the Parable of the Talents). That being understood, however, I think it more than likely that in this instance you may be even more correct than you know in blaming self-described Catholic educational institutions for your ignorance (former ignorance, happily) of the New Testament.

    I too had an across-the-board Catholic education. I started college in September 1962, just under a month before the first session of Vatican II opened. Yet in retrospect it became plain to me that almost everyone in the theology department was wise before the fact with regard to the “improvements” to doctrine, morals, and liturgical practice that the conciliar insiders were about to ram down the bishops’, priests’, and laity’s throats.

    Without going into the gory details, suffice to say that if I hadn’t been taught by hardheaded Ursuline nuns in grammar school and equally hardheaded (not to mention hard-fisted) Irish Christian Brothers in high school, it is unlikely that I would ever have recovered in the late nineties from the thirty-five-year infection with the disease of conciliarism that I was forcibly vaxxed with in college.

  133. Sexual orientation has ZERO correlation with political or religious perspective, whether gay or straight. Yes the Anglo-Zionist “liberal” types have pushed gay pride and trannies as a virtue signal, and yes nowadays there are legions of brutally propagandized youngsters making bad choices and whose entire lives have marinated inside the rotting imperial legacy & social media koolaid. Imperial queers like Anderson Cooper and Rachel Maddow and their cheerleaders/apologists are loud and get lots of tv time and other coverage, in precisely the same ways and proportions that Trump and Russia are attacked and demonized. All of it is fake. An empire of lies, as Putin says.

    But go ahead and keep hating faggots as the source of your problems. Few of us on the other side are as mouthy as I am, but many of us look at the hateful stereotyping and violence like St. Francis did. Which is to say, for every act of hatred and violence and exclusion thrown our way, we are building up treasure in heaven.

    And may the Lord Jesus Christ, Son of our Heavenly Father, have mercy on me, a miserable sinner. Amen.

  134. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Pierre de Craon

    Why would Satan or his Synagogue ignore any practicing Catholic? The Church has been a bulwark against the worst excesses of the Synagogue of Satan until Jews “reformed” Christians right out of the Church. See Jewish Influence on Christian Reform Movements by Rabbi Louis I. Newman Sadly, Satan and his Synagogue have turned their eye of Sauron upon the SSPX. Without insult to the faithful majority of SSPX parish priests, the SSPX leadership cabal has been subverted and now engages in gaslighting, fratricide, Judaizing, enabling of sex predators, and disappearing evidence:

    Shortly following appointment of the avowed Zionist (and German representative to the European Union) Maxmilian Krah to run SSPX global finance, the SSPX websites were scrubbed of the perennial Church teaching on the Jews (including this article that I was able to rescue: ) and H.E. Bishop Richard Williamson was expelled for daring to utter the truth about the HoloHoax. Since then a troubling series of enabled and coddled sexual predators has come to light.

    That SSPX leadership cabal has been caught repeatedly in lies and reversals. 101 of those lies have been documented here: As We Are? 101 Compromises, Changes, and Contradictions of an SSPX in Pursuit of a Practical Accord with Modernist Rome by Sean Johnson

  135. @anarchyst

    My statement is not Protestant, and it cannot by any interpretation be deemed sola scriptura. I repudiate any such accusation, and as a Catholic, I certainly would not characterize sola scriptura as anything but a heresy for Catholics and an instance of inculpable ignorance for many Protestants.

    The Bible is meant to be used as an avenue of divine revelation and instruction. That, I insist, is the completely orthodox understanding. Errors of astronomy or geography or genealogy are immaterial and irrelevant to God’s message.

    I find it extraordinarily surprising that you would confuse such matters with the raison d’être for the Bible’s very existence, and I deny that anything I wrote gave legitimate ground for your baseless accusations.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Hibernian
  136. @Unashamed Catholic

    You read Unz Review, but you use Rational Wiki as a source?

    More correctly, I post at the Unz site, and use the Wikis as a “first stop” in researching something or somebody.

    Author Jones was mighty vague about his firing, and I’d bet it’s for a different reason than what he hints at. I’d wager the man made himself positively obnoxious for his “belief” in a standard Catholic doctrine in order for that “belief” to rise to the level of getting canned. He can tell us more about the situation if he wants, but I’d bet that won’t happen. Speculation: he found somebody among students or staff who had had to have an abortion to safeguard her life, and started harassing them. Or maybe went around chanting that both the abortion doctor and his patient ought to be executed – every single time.

    I was tempted to remark about how a “traditional” Catholic had only two children. In the not-too-distant past that breed was notorious in my part of Indiana as having houses packed with kids. Yet somehow Author Jones managed to avoid that. Speculation again: maybe his wife was a hell of a lot smarter than him.

    Consider how the Vatican reacted when the 9-year-old in Brazil carrying the twins of her rapist went to an abortion doctor. Screams of “Every Life Is Precious” rang out from the Holier Than Thou Males running the Vatican.

    As a matter of fact, human lives are “precious” to the Vatican only when saying that is convenient and expedient. Pope Pius XII excommunicated every single Italian Communist in 1946.

    But did that Infallible Ass in Gold Underwear do the same for ANY Nazis? Not that I’m aware of. Nor am I aware of this Traditional Pope previously saying a single word about the ongoing mass murders of the Christ Killers. Conclusion: the twelfth Pius approved of what the Nazis were doing. Getting more general now, I’d wager that the total body count of the Vatican over the past 1500 years is a close match for those of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler – combined.

    Another link an that Rational Wiki had this:

    Jones, who has appeared on a number of white supremacist online shows and believes the Jews are responsible for the death of Jesus Christ…

    You style yourself “Unashamed Catholic”, so I must ask if you also declare that Jews killed Jesus. Or can you agree with me that Author Jones is a total ignoramus regarding real history as opposed to “Traditional” Catholic dogma.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  137. @Al Liguori

    May God bless you, too, Al, for your tremendous labors on behalf of His truth!

    Now, if you would be good enough to explain to anarchyst (comment no. 133) why what I wrote does not imply the sola scriptura heresy, I shall say a decade of the rosary for your intentions. In fact, I’ll say it anyway, irrespective of whether you have a go at anarchyst or not!

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  138. Z-man says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    I was over a decade behind you so the Catholic educational system was way more corrupted by then. Of course at the time it was all compatible with my bachelor lifestyle. I saw the flaws in the system when I later had a family and especially when my children were teenagers and observed how the Vatican II Church had let my children down with a modern and flawed moral compass.
    Thanks for your reply BTW.

  139. In the simplest of terms, Notre Dame ceased to be a Catholic university on the day that it first admitted non-Catholic students. The destruction was compleye when they hired non-Catholic faculty. This fatal mistake has destroyed very nearly ALL Christian institutions of higher learning in America. The Jews might be the most lethal infection to have taken hold in these institutions, but they were rarely ever the first.

    • Agree: Automatic Slim
  140. @sillyGooseLara

    A spoiled, ignorant girl gives orders. What a surprise!

    What’s next chez vous? Smutty photos?

    Go snap your towel at someone else, honey. I’ve been immune to your type for thirty years.

  141. @Tucker

    Sounds like we’d have a healthy American nationalism if all this aborting had never been done.

    Welfare would have collapsed and many of the useless eaters would have long since starved or been rubbed out by now.

    We’re weak as a nation precisely because of things like welfare and abortion on demand. It allowed us to ignore deep social and spiritual issues for 50 years.

    You guys need to think outside the box more.

  142. @LaraSometimesaGoose


    For Christ’s sake you women and your disgusting fantasies……

    Before we go on I’m going to insist we quantify how many abortions are performed on rape and incest victims versus how many are performed on tawdry harlots who got knocked up by Chad at a most inopportune time and stood to have a horrible beach body on their trip to Turks and Caicos.

    Women are silly and irresponsible retards. Stop having sex with men you aren’t serious about. YOU are the gatekeepers of sex. YOU allowed the sperm into your body. Nobody else. I have never heard a serious person insist that women should be forced to carry rape babies to term. Never. The media amplifies these extremely rare cases and the most extreme fundamentalist religious nuts with the express purpose of muddying the waters as you’re doing here. Understand this to mean REAL RAPE, not “well I didn’t really want to but…..”

    Either that or admit women lack agency and need chaperones. These pro-abortion arguments are retarded. Women are either rational actors, or not. Stop screwing all over town and it won’t be an issue.

    • Thanks: Blodgie
    • Replies: @werpor
  143. 1jonny says:

    Nearly all the fellow common white men I know are dreadfully ill-informed about world or even national events. Several of these same can tell you all about the distinction between zone blocking and man blocking by an offensive line (football). I’ll give many of the jewish people I’ve known this: they take some interest in current events and what they signify.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  144. @4justice

    I don’t think you know what ad hominem means.

    “If you are really just an IDF unit 8200 member trying to sow anger and division, then sure, keep doing what you are doing.”

    This is ad hominem.

    You’re welcome.

  145. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Pierre de Craon

    Thank you. For our family’s intention, the conversion of the Synagogue of Satan!

    This is correct:

    The Bible is not Jewish. The Old Testament was given by God, via His inspired choice and direction, to the Jews, but the Bible’s authority is a function of its godliness, not its Jewishness.

    This is ambiguous and disconnected, a non-sequitur:

    …is a typical Protestant doctrine…”sola scriptura”… All “sola scriptura” does is binds the Bible to the jews, and be inference Protestantism.

    Yes, sola scriptura is indeed a Protestant heresy, but their heresy does not bind talmudic jews (the Synagogue of Satan) to Scripture. There is no “only” explicit or implicit in Pierre de Craon’s accurate statement, hence no connection to sola scriptura, “non-sequitur.”

    Acknowledging that (1) some of God’s Word has been transcribed and (2) God’s people have been entrusted custody of His Word in no way exhorts a sola scriptura belief that only what has been transcribed is from God. In every setting we must be excruciatingly clear—God’s people are not those who are His and our most malevolent enemies.

    Elaborating the argument…

    To use the word “jews” only invites ambiguity that wrongly conflates Israel, the New Israel, and the Synagogue of Satan. Israel was once God’s people, but having voided the covenant (among many, Jeremias 31:31-32) there is a New Chosen people (1 Peter 2:9-10), the New Israel. The Synagogue of Satan has never been God’s people—not before Christ (Pharisees and child-sacrificing Moloch worshippers) and not after Christ (child sacrificing talmudic “jews”).

    Pierre de Craon’s statement maintains the clarity in identifying God’s people and avoids the treacherous weaponized ambiguity in the relatively modern word “jews.” Arguably “Jesus was a jew” is the most blasphemous weaponization of the word “jew.” The extended argument defeating that deceit is here:

    God made no statement even remotely suggestive of “sola scriptura” in either the Old or the New Testaments. In fact, His Word is quite clear that His people are bound to the preaching of His Apostles, not exclusively to any publication or Bible (2 Thessalonians 2:14, 2 Thessalonians 3:6, Mark 16:15, 2 Timothy 2:2, 1 Corinthians 11:2). His Word notes that the Scriptures are salutary, but also crystal clear that the legitimate oral conveyance from Jesus through His Apostles is necessary. His Word is explicit that it is not complete in itself (John 21:25). In a phrase, sola scriptura is anti-scriptural. The extended argument is here:

    “The Jews” (Synagogue of Satan!) perverted the Old Law with their “Oral Torah” (the Talmud and Kabbala née Torah she b’peh ) as the Protestants have perverted the New Law with their sola scriptura (laughably expurgated and bowdlerized “scripture” ) and the rest of their anti-Biblical doctrines. It is critical to distinguish God’s people then and now from “the Synagogue of Satan, those who say they are jews, and are not, but do lie” (Apocalypse 3:9) and their proselytes, the other “children of Hell two-fold,” Judeo-Protestants (Matthew 23:15). Contrary to anarchyst’s claim, both “the Jews” (Synagogue of Satan!) and Judeo-Protestants (“children of hell twofold”) have unbound themselves from Scripture, the diametric opposite of the binding that anarchyst predicated.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  146. 1jonny says:

    Maybe just a trace of this despicable anti-semitism is caused by Jews, in the West, at least, continually, relentlessly, systematically, advancing their own agenda, often, at least, to the detriment of the much larger culture in which they’re living. Often this destructive influence and remaking appears to quite intentional, although I can’t say, really. That has a lot to do, it appears, with what E. Michael calls the “Gay Disco” having backed Christianity into a corner in the US: constant criticism and deconstruction of the existing Christian culture, spearheaded, seemingly, by people and groups fairly massively over-represented by Jews.

  147. Art says:

    Why do you people continue to deal with Jews?

    There can be no doubt about it – the majority of Jews are raised evil.

  148. werpor says:
    @Stripes Duncan

    One only has to spend a little time looking at photographs of nude women on the Internet to realize why societies have struggled to provide women with protection in return for sexual fidelity. I suppose women are driven to bear children with different fathers from some deep seated instinct to increase gene variability in their offspring. Being a cuckold is humiliating. No wonder men from time to time beat their wives; or their children or abuse their step daughters.

    Generally, when a man falls in love, he no doubt intends to be faithful. I wonder if women do? Men are fools. It is in the nature of women’s biological imperative that she may very well disguise her drives from herself and her husband. But, my own experience and including my knowledge of the couples I have known during my long lifetime, has led me to a rather bleak conclusion. I cannot imagine all these women posing nude on thousands of web sites have been coerced. Obviously money is exchanged for services rendered.

    Men and women will never though, reach their full potential, without they reconsider the value of ancient wisdom. The idea of sublimating sexual urges has no place in the world today. The consequences are on display wherever one looks.

    Some might consider me prudish. But there are boundaries we ought not cross. Widespread unhappiness, and discontent comes of one’s complete abandonment to external rewards. The complete lack of conscious self awareness and knowledge of the means of achieving it has been lost.

    We modern people know everything; yet we understand nothing. So we suffer!

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon
    • Replies: @Father Coughlin
  149. @spacewanderer

    E. Michael Jones is EXTREMELY ANTISEMITIC for questioning the promotion of ((( Abortion, LGBT, Tranny Sex-Change for school kids, the Porn Industry, Pharma Opiates, Bank Debt Usury, MSM NEWS Disinformation )))…BECAUSE THESE ARE ALL INDUSTRIES WHICH ARE RUN BY a criminal bank cartel CABAL (Rothschild Khazarian Mafia) who call themselves “JEWS”. But they ARE NOT the ACTUAL HEBREWS of the ancient Bible Prophets…but rather CONVERTS…POLITICAL OPPORTUNIST CRIMINALS who hide behind the reputable brand name “Jew” as a liability shield, to deflect accountability, and to gain false trust (sheep’s in wolves clothing).

    These CRIMINAL IMPOSTER “JEWS” have infiltrated ALL influencial organizations, for example on the:

    POLITICAL RIGHT they = War “jews”

    POLITICAL LEFT they = Sodomy “jews”

    The REAL JEWS who actually follow the Torah and the Old Testimment = Deli Jews…and it is these poor people (real Jews = deli Jews) who usually suffer the most backlash…because of the criminal “hutzpah” of the WAR “Jews” and the Sodomy “Jews”…

    VERY IMPORTANT!!! We MUST BE VERY CAREFUL to disempower this IMPOSTER JEWISH CRIMINAL CABAL, while NOT PERSECUTING THEM TO HARSHLY…otherwise they will weaponize their “Anti-Semitism” Victim Narrative against ALL OF US…for another 7000 years.

    + God help us +

  150. @Al Liguori

    Well, Al, I’ve already prayed one decade, but on the basis of this formidable presentation, I’d say you’ve earned a second for your family’s intention. God bless you and them! Indeed, God bless all commenters who have written with good intentions and in good will in this thread, whatever disagreements may persist among us.

    • Replies: @Chriss
    , @Al Liguori
  151. Dube says:

    Try some skin thickener.

    • Replies: @Anon
  152. anarchyst says:
    @Zachary Smith

    There was no “mass murder” of jews during WW2. The so-called “holocaust is a fabrication and the biggest scam of the 20th century. In fact, the word “holocaust” did not come into use until the 1960s when the jews found out that they could make money from it.
    Population figures after WW2 show a net increase of jews.
    The actual figure of camp deaths is approximately 271,000, NOT 6,000,000.

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon
    • Replies: @Zachary Smith
  153. anarchyst says:

    I’ve been criticizing White men for supporting professional “sports” for more than a few decades. I never watched that garbage…
    Not only the “National Felon League” and the “National Basketball Association” but even that bastion of truly white skills, NASCAR has been infected with “woke” ideology. When (((they))) banned the “Stars and Bars” flag, a part of their history, NASCAR sealed its fate, along with the promotion of substandard “affirmative action” black driver “bubba” wallace complaining about “racist” garage door pulls, NASCARs fate was set. To add insult to injury, recently “bubba” wallace’s typical black violent tendencies were on full display.
    Let’s not forget the billions spent by White male “sports fans” on sports ball jerseys, caps and other “trinkets”, overpriced game tickets and taxpayer-subsidized stadiums (playpens), all to benefit the (((owners))) of the criminal steroid-addled costumed players who are paid millions of dollars to play children’s games.
    “Bread and circuses” which are provided to “quell the masses” are just as successful now as they were in ancient times…
    It is disgusting to see White men spout off useless and meaningless sports statistics and the adulation that they give these costumed players (actors). It is just sickening to see White men debase themselves.
    I realize that sports ball is “entertainment for the masses” and do look down derisively on grown White men who sport their favorite sports ball players clothing or other accouterments. I think to myself: “don’t you have anything better to do?”
    There are much better things for white men to do than watch sports ball sports.
    Build something…repair something…study philosophy or technical journals on something that interests you, make something better, improve yourself and your standard of living and devices…use your wisdom and knowledge to get your fellow Whites to THINK for themselves, not what to think, but HOW to think and to not just accept the pablum, lies and falsehoods of the mainstream media and useless professional sports.
    Message to White men: Get away from the sports ball. You are much better than that…

    • Replies: @1jonny
  154. @anarchyst

    There was no “mass murder” of jews during WW2.

    So far as I can tell, there are about three possible groups encouraging this line. First would be genuine wannabee 2022 Nazis who are dim/ignorant enough to believe it.

    A second bunch would be the Government of Germany. As with Japan, I’ve become convinced that there is a stealth campaign to minimize the WW2 guilt of their ancestors, and to fuzz up the respective situations as much as possible.

    Finally there are the Zionists. Screaming about Fake Holocausts is akin to their dim bulbs damaging Jewish burial places and other activities. Keeping American Jews shaking in their boots with fear is a very good control method – keeping them quiet about what their monster co-religionists are doing in the former Palestine.

    Population figures after WW2 show a net increase of jews.

    I know little about the data collection processes in pre-WW2 Europe, but without a lot of good evidence I’d certainly not trust the numbers available now. Too much time has passed, and there has been too many opportunities for hidden hands to “adjust” the figures.

    The actual figure of camp deaths is approximately 271,000, NOT 6,000,000.

    Same objection as the last one. The Germans didn’t have as good an opportunity to destroy/alter the paperwork as did the Japanese, but too much time has passed and all witnesses are now dead. Another factor is that the Zionists have made genuine research illegal unless those efforts produce the magic 6,000,000 figure.

    But only fanatical/crazy and ignorant people can deny the savagery of the Nazis. A key part of your last remarks was “camp deaths”. The problem with going “tunnel vision” on that phrase is that many, and perhaps most, deaths were outside the official death camps. Take the Soviet POWs – the early ones were simply starved to death by the millions. Only when German Industry Bosses exerted themselves did they get access to Jews, Russians, and others. The plan was literally to work them to death, and you can bet your last dollar the record-keeping in those projects was skimpy. Some American Slave Owners found it profitable to work their black slaves to death, then buy new ones. In some ways the post-war Convict rental system was even better, for the cost was lower and nobody cared if the convicts died. The Nazis had the best of all deals – totally cost-free Labor they were expected to kill. I don’t expect to ever see an English translation of Mommsen’s Volkswagen and Its Workers During the Third Reich.

    Mr. Unz has an endless procession of Nazi-sympathizers here, and he often pretends to believe some of the BS himself. As I’ve said in the past, this is highly patriotic work in the project of keeping American Jews scared spitless.

    • Disagree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Anon
  155. JM says:
    @Robert Dolan

    I’m not a Roman Catholic, but your more intimate experience corresponds to my observations over decades. Catholics are the most cucked, conformist (to the dominant paradigm) members of the community. They adhere to Catholic precepts far less than many secularized Protestants. Most of the younger ones don’t know the significance of the Sacraments and have a totally pragmatic attitude to them. I have found that Orthodox Christians in their own lands are far more protective of such things than Catholics. I think Catholicism exists largely as a big self-serving club, backed by the great wealth and economic/political leverage of the Catholic Church. That constitutes the residue after Catholicism is gutted of the essential doctrines that far greater numbers of Catholics used to adhere to when the pecuniary benefits were far less.

    Look at the way most Catholics refused to defend Cardinal Pell against the frame-up which was largely orchestrated by Catholics in the Australian media. Most were either tight lipped or fell into line with the hysteria. I’m sure that there are serious Catholics around, but they are hard to come by. I’d say they have as much of a battle with their “co-religionists” (!) as I have fighting a more secular war with my countrymen.

    • Agree: Blodgie
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  156. Turk 152 says:

    The US is a brutal, lonely place in which women trade sex for companionship. Children are a tremendous responsibility to bear for a young single mother. I appreciate the nobility of the Catholic sentiment against abortion and agree that abortion may have ushered in some of the degeneracy of our modern world. But how are these young women supposed to survive in a country with a very limited social safety net, when a man just walks away for better options? I just spoke to a single woman a few weeks ago with young kids, she is suicidal with despair at the calamity of her life. Perhaps she deserves it, but would you with that fate on your own daughters?

  157. I find it hard to accept that anyone claiming to be pro-White would be anti-abortion, and for those who who consider racial consciousnesses gauche but nevertheless value civilized order, you should still not be anti-abortion. Here’s stats I scraped from the web after a quick Google,

    Among the 30 areas that reported race by ethnicity data for 2019, non-Hispanic White women and non-Hispanic Black women accounted for the largest percentages of all abortions (33.4% and 38.4%, respectively), and Hispanic women and non-Hispanic women in the other race category accounted for smaller percentages (21.0% and 7.2%, respectively) 

    Non-Hispanic White women had the lowest abortion rate (6.6 abortions per 1,000 women) and ratio (117 abortions per 1,000 live births), and non-Hispanic Black women had the highest abortion rate (23.8 abortions per 1,000 women) and ratio (386 abortions per 1,000 live births).

    Consider this this data in light of the the fact that blacks consume more in government spending than they pay in (I don’t know where Hispanics fit into that picture). The situation is simply unfair to White (and Asian) tax payers. Ideally persons dependent on the state would be sterilized but that’s considered by the NYT editorial board to be a despicable stance. That’s means that abortion is the only remaining option that we’re left with. Obviously taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to pay for it and doctors shouldn’t be forced to be involved, but it should be legal.

    Speaking as a Buddhist I’m not going to tell you that abortion is perfectly OK in my religion, but the dogmatic statements made by Christians strike me as the sort of virtue theatre we rightly accuse the leftists of engaging in.

    TBH there isn’t a 100% clear Buddhist position on the subject. I’m partial to the following view:

    But unlike the scientists, they do not assume that consciousness does not appear until the senses develop. So while the embryo certainly deserves moral consideration, its limited capacity to feel pain means that killing an embryo falls short of ‘murder’.

    I’ve noticed that many of the blowhards pontificating about the evils abortion don’t have any kind of plan for paying for the ramifications of abortion bans themselves. Clergymen and pastors aren’t going to pay for anything. They expect everyone else to do that.

    • Replies: @Anon
  158. Chriss says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    I tried…….

    /…who have written with good intentions and in good will in this thread,/…/

  159. 1jonny says:

    I’m guilty of it myself (following some sportsball), actually, but I don’t let it or any other purely escapist entertainment consume my interest.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  160. Anon[337] • Disclaimer says:

    Nothing to do with skin thickener Dube Job.

    Like several folks here we dont need Alden;s lectures from the pulpit. If she does not like it here leave. Its like hating Niggers and hanging at a dindoo disco, or disliking Joos and being a pest at the synagogue.

    Glad she has you as a fag disciple and cuck defender though. Listen I already have a thick foreskin, maybe I can Lube the Dube and give you my Tube. LOL

    • Replies: @Dube
  161. anarchyst says:
    @Zachary Smith

    Do the research. It’s actually quite easy.
    If you have a scientific or technical background and care to seek the TRUTH about this non-event, you will find that the claims made by holocaust promoters are not only logistically, physically and scientifically impossible, but are totally outlandish and even laughable.
    Let’s look at a few claims made by holocaust promoters.
    –Killing jews with “bug spray” (Zyklon B) is not only impossible, but is laughable on its face. There are much better “killing agents” than “bug spray”.
    –Transporting jews to “camps”, utilizing scarce energy sources, transportation and logistical difficulties only to kill them is not only problematic but impossible as well.
    –Tattooing camp inmates only to kill them is also problematic.
    –If the “camps” were truly “death camps” why would medical facilities, recreational facilities, brothels, movie theaters, and other amenities be needed?
    –“Gas chambers” with non-sealed wooden doors and the lack of ventilation systems for such facilities, once again, disproves the claims made by holocaust™ promoters. Doors that “swing the wrong way” would make retrieval of the bodies impossible. Ordinary light fixtures, rather than explosion proof lighting fixtures are claimed to have been the norm.
    –Claims by holocaust™ promoters that gassed bodies were blue or green (rather than bright red) from poisoning are totally false.
    –Claims that the inmates could tell when jews were being cremated by the smell and color of smoke emitted from the crematoria chimneys are patently foolish and false.
    –Let’s not forget “lampshades, wallets, soap and shrunken heads” made from jews is also laughable,
    –Crematoria running 24 hours a day, without “downtime” for maintenance on the muffles and flames “visible out of the crematoria stacks” are also impossibilities. Crematoria are designed to burn “clean” with no visible smoke and definitely no flames outside the stacks would be possible. Not only that, the claims that thousands of bodies were cremated daily are a statistical impossibility as it takes approximately 1.5 hours to cremate a human body. If cremation were used on “6 million” jews, the cremation process would have been operating into the 1950s.
    –Keep in mind, that there is a jewish prohibition on investigating suspected burial sites for remains in place. What are (((they))) trying to hide? (These sites do not exist).
    –The lack of depositories for bodies and ashes is more proof that the “camps” were not “death camps” but rather “work camps” for the German war effort
    –“Masturbation machines, electric floors, steam chambers and other ridiculous claims that are still claimed.
    –Anne Frank’s “diary” partially written with a ball-point pen which was not invented till the 1950s. Time travel, anyone? lol
    Germans were (and still are) excellent engineers and would not have engineered the grievous errors that are claimed by holocaust promoters.
    The stories that so-called “holocaust survivors” claim are presented as fact with no honest investigation permitted.
    Towards the end of the war, vital transportation infrastructures were destroyed by the Allies. Typhus was rampant as a result. In fact, Anne Frank’s father was treated in a camp hospital and survived the war. Answer me this…what is a hospital doing in a supposed “death camp”?
    There are holocaust survivors who never left the USA, or were in non-combat areas in Europe that are claiming “reparations”. In fact, many jews lived out normal lives during the war both in Germany and other European countries without incident.
    Here is a major question for you to peruse…
    Why is honest investigation into holocaust claims a CRIME in many countries? It would seem that holocaust promoters would welcome honest impartial investigation if only to prove their claims.
    Holocaustianity is a “state religion” in many countries, from which no deviance from “commonly accepted beliefs” is tolerated, even if these claims can be proven false. Germany is known for incarcerating elderly women for the “crime” of questioning “that which shall not be questioned”. The kangaroo courts that enforce holocaustianity disallow the entering of evidence that disproves “commonly accepted beliefs” about this non-event. It’s called “judicial notice”.
    What are holocaust promoters afraid of? The TRUTH.
    I have started you on your quest for TRUTH. If you take it, you will be a better person for it.

    • Replies: @Dr. Merkvurkdigliebe
  162. anarchyst says:

    Not all Catholics are “cucks” as you state. You are correct in stating that many Catholics “go through the motions” and appear not to take their faith seriously.
    Having come of age in pre-Vatican II Catholicism, I observed that much was lost with the changes wrought by this “coup”.
    Roman Catholicism was Protestantized, hence the deep faith was replaced with “anything goes”.
    As to Cardinal Pell’s lynching, parallel examples of inaction can be noted.
    In the 1990s, the “big thing” being pushed was the supposed rampant abuse of children in day-care centers. Innocent day-care center personnel were convicted of abuse and imprisoned when none occurred, purely on the statements from children who were coached by both police and social workers with agendas of their own. The stories were impossible on their face. An innocent hug of a child could be construed as abuse by these vicious social workers and police…
    The McMartin and Amirault cases come to mind. Innocent people were “railroaded” and sentenced to harsh prison terms despite their innocence.
    How many good people came to the defense of the McMartin and Amiraults?–NONE. People were too fearful of being called enablers and worse.
    It is easy to see that many people would be reluctant to defend Cardinal Pell from such accusations because of the toxic atmosphere created by his accusers.
    Keep in mind that jews still have a visceral hatred of Catholicism and will do EVERYTHING in their power to destroy it.
    Best regards,

    • Replies: @JM
    , @mulga mumblebrain
  163. Seb says:

    Lack of the true faith at Notre Dame is really just a small microcosm of the broader issue within the “Catholic” Church at large, namely that it is not actually Christian. Jones seems to be caught in a conundrum: he sees people who purport to be Catholic occupying the infrastructure and hierarchy that once belonged to the true Catholic Church yet sees the folly in their ways. Perhaps if he spent half the amount of time he devotes to studying all traces of Jewry in every nook and cranny of the earth to familiarizing himself with the official dogma as it remains in the Deposit of Faith, then perhaps God might illuminate him to the truth, which is that the hierarchy and infrastructure of the Catholic Church–just like every other institution in the world–has been seized by the forces of evil, which does in fact include Jews but also comprises of freemasons, communists, and occultists. The true faith exists among the remnant who have adopted Sedevacantism, the only position consistent with the history and dogma of the Church, and until Jones resolves the dissonance in what he sees and believes, he will continue to say “inshallah” every month with that cackling hyena, Kevin Barret.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
  164. Anon[256] • Disclaimer says:

    .. they and Dr. Jones worship a Judean man as their god … case closed on Dr. Jones… wake up my Westerner kinfolk!

  165. @Pierre de Craon

    I too had an across-the-board Catholic education. I started college in September 1962, just under a month before the first session of Vatican II opened.

    You are the same age as treasured author and courageous truth and freedom spokesman Kevin MacDonald who graduated from a Catholic high school that year then matriculated to a series of state universities thereafter. Obviously, his articles appear here on sporadically.

    His book

    has probably done more than anything pre Kanye West to bring awareness of Jew perfidy and power to the general population since the brainwashing of the American public by the Jews during and post WWII.

    Whether due to discouragement resulting from the post Vatican II conduct of the Catholic Church, his college age flirtation with the Left (which by Divine Providence eventually made him all the wiser about Jew treachery as an insider to Jew driven 1960s campus unrest), or whatever, he who has given us so much has lost what is most necessary for him, his Catholic faith.

    Please use your prayers to Divine Savior Jesus and your considerable intellectual persuasiveness here in every effort to bring Dr. MacDonald back into the the Salvation of The Roman Catholic Church.

    • Agree: Father Coughlin
    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  166. Anon[349] • Disclaimer says:

    Catholics including E. Mike are anti-White cultists. They love black bodies filling the pews. E. Mike denies that Whites even exist, although he will occasionally refer to us as “pig-chasers.”

    Holy Church has long condemned America, the nation, as a heresy. So it’s dishonest for Nick Fuentes to promote a Catholic theocracy under the banner of “America First.” Turns out it’s really Holy Church and “the souls of black folks” first. It’s only logical that he has partnered with a rapper.

    But if all this soul stuff is the epitome of logic and reason, as E. Mike maintains, then why the Catholic oppostion to troons? After all, if it’s rational to believe that a man can come back from the dead, then why not believe that a boy can become a girl, or a Negro become white, or a (baptized) Jew become a good citizen? Anything can happen in the world o’ miracles E. Mike is hot to uphold as “reason.”

    I will be told that biology is the reason a boy can’t miraculously become a girl. DNA, invented by God, prevents it. But why isn’t racial DNA entitled to the same consideration? Why is God’s design upheld in the one case, but denounced as materialism in the other? Isn’t consistency supposed to be a part of logic?

    Note that when the material world is dispensed with, everything is permitted. Troons asset that their soul is a different sex; the material world is only an illusion in their minds. Catholics and other anti-racists assert that there aren’t (and shouldn’t be) any White people; race is only an illusion, a category of man’s low, material mind.

    Contrary to what we’re being told, the insanity – all of it: troons to anti-racism – comes from religion. It’s anti-White Oriental Abrahamic cults all the way down. E. Mike plays good cop/commissar, a rabbi plays bad cop/commissar. Whites must reject all this Jewish filth entirely.

    • Replies: @Seb
    , @JM
    , @Jiacovelli
  167. Aservant says:
    @Old Brown Fool

    What abysmal Jewish thinking. No, you can get way further ahead without a university degree by going into trades, way further ahead. This is why the Jewish paradigm continues to dominate, because of this simplistic way of thought. This is why even millions of third worlders from Latin America are coming to the US often barely literate in their own languages, with no papers, and are out earning native born, White Americans by the millions. The vast majority of university degrees capacitate you in no practical, real world skill, and this has been obvious for decades to those that have been paying attention. Still, even on a site like this, where supposedly those with clarity share their views, it is common to believe that one must become a Jewish automaton by getting a university degree in order to be “successful”. The US is doomed……and rightfully so. Can’t come quick enough for me.

    • Replies: @Anon
  168. Anon[241] • Disclaimer says:
    @Zachary Smith

    Zach, the evidence that there was no Holocaust is mountainous. If you’re really interested in looking at it, not merely dismissing it with a wave of the hand, start by looking up Holocaust Handbooks online. You have been misused.

  169. Dube says:

    Now show us how you can twist your head around 180 degrees.

  170. @Brás Cubas

    It means antisemitism equals something happening in my brain, which is the only place where perceptions happen. It is literally a thought crime.

  171. @werpor

    Accommodating the case of rape with abortion is the wrong way to go. We should focus on preventing rape. Obviously the baby did not ask to be conceived.

    • Replies: @shadowy_figure
    , @werpor
  172. Seb says:

    You jumped from saying Catholics denounce racism to equating that with putting black souls first–that’s quite the leap. How did you get from one side to the other?

    • Replies: @Anon
  173. @Father Coughlin

    Accommodating the case of rape with abortion is the wrong way to go. We should focus on preventing rape. Obviously the baby did not ask to be conceived.

    Whos is going to *do* the accommodating? Do you expect the mother to look after the kid? If not who’s going to pay for the foster care? Who’s going to pay for the special ed costs (approx 100K USD per pupil)? I have the feeling that it’s not you who’s going to do that. It’s everyone else. That seems to be the default position for pious Catholics. It’s always been this way with the Catholic church. The early church wouldn’t even pay for itself. It forced people to pay taxes to it. The only reason it stopped was because it lost its power of compulsion. Priests haranguing the laypeople about morality while running an international extortion racket.

  174. @anarchyst

    No buttons available, so here is my thanks for your comment. Most informative.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  175. Anon[209] • Disclaimer says:

    Attribution of quotes? or just making stuff up? EMJ up to his usual stuff

  176. Anon[844] • Disclaimer says:

    “this has been obvious for decades to those that have been paying attention”

    The mass man shuts down his brain at age 40. A normie 70 years old today, for example, is mentally frozen in 1992. If he is 80, then in 1982. By mentally frozen, I mean that his mental picture of the world, with all of the assumptions back of that picture, remains substantially as it was when he turned 40. This is especially true if he succeeded by 40.

    After the mass man enters on his mental calcification, he experiences the world as a place increasingly bewildering, and retreats into nostalgia. “Why don’t these kids get off their ass and get a paper route?” “An upstanding officer like General Patton will step up and save America.” Etc.

    It seems the public, including public officials, always operate on the programming they received before age 35 or 40. This baleful phenomenon is also called a “career path.” EU bureaucrats, for example, are merely putting into place policies which are founded on the assumptions that they were programmed with 20 or 30 years ago. The catastrophic results that we are seeing right now might matter to them if they were 23 years old now, but they are 50+ and well along on the “career path,” and so will carry out their programming (which all of them call their “principles”) to the bitter end, facts be damned.

    The fruits of education (or programming) do not appear for decades. This means it’s true that one must wait for the old robots to die off before change can come.

  177. Anon[402] • Disclaimer says:

    The races are unequal and incompatible in the same nation. As Jefferson wrote, “the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government” (a quote elided on his monument). He meant something slightly different, being concerned as he was with the resentments surrounding the peculiar institution, but the point stands: the natural incompatibility of the races cannot be removed by multicultural policies any more than they can be by faith, hope, and charity. I might reference Putnam et al. ad infinitum, but I believe the point will be have more force for you if it’s put not in factual terms (which I think will be dismissed as “materialism”) but in religious. So: Why, Seb, are you bent on the misguided project of contravening the Lord’s judgment at the Tower of Babel?

    • Replies: @Seb
  178. anarchyst says:
    @Dr. Merkvurkdigliebe

    Now that I’ve covered the technical aspects of “the fraud of the 20th century”, please allow me to cover the geopolitical aspects of the “holocaust” as well.
    Most “little jews” just want to live out their lives, just like us gentiles.
    This was a problem for the zionist leaders in pre-WW2 Germany as most “little jews” who had businesses in Wiemar Germany had no desire to emigrate. They lived fine lives in Germany, controlled most businesses, the media, banks and the economy in general.
    As an aside, most jews were not sent to camps for the war effort, but lived quiet lives in Europe throughout the entire war. It was communists and troublemakers who were interned. Jews served in the military as well.
    Most of the angst directed at the jews was a result of zionist leaders purposely colluding with the German government to “make life difficult” for the average jew, thereby “encouraging” them to emigrate to what was then known as Palestine.
    The 1933 newspaper headline declaration: “Jews Declare War On Germany” certainly curried no favor with the average German, who quite often had a worse time economically than his jewish neighbors.
    As to Kristallnacht, this was a one-day (night) affair that angered Hitler to the extreme as it spoiled plans and agreements that he had with the zionist leaders who were “running the show”, providing for an orderly emigration process.
    It might interest historical types to know that it was zionist leaders who insisted that jews wear the “yellow star of david” as a means of identification, NOT the German government. This was all part of the zionist plan to marginalize German jews, making life difficult for them by design to encourage emigration, a feature, not a bug.
    Add to that, a vile book “Germany Must Perish” was authored by Theodore N. Kaufman which advocated the total destruction of Germany, its people, culture, institutions and anything German. Germans who would be allowed to live were to be sterilized, German language being prohibited and everything German to be sold off or destroyed.
    This vile book was quite popular in anti-German circles and is a reminder that the jewish penchant for total destruction of civilizations still exists. This book is available for free as a pdf. I encourage all to obtain and read it. It will make you sick.
    One aspect of judaism that requires exploration is that of jewish solidarity and cohesiveness, which deserves commendation and emulation. The present-day problem is that today’s jews abhor other groups who desire to utilize this same solidarity and cohesiveness for themselves. This one aspect of jewish behavior does them no good and is but one more reason there is so much hatred and angst against jewish behavior. The main factor affecting jewish/gentile relations is the insistence that gentiles accept “multiculturalism and diversity” while jews do just the opposite. THAT is a major reason why (some) jews are hated. It’s the old “do as I say, not as I do” attitude that causes friction between jews and gentiles.
    Seek TRUTH.

  179. JM says:

    Not all Catholics are “cucks” as you state.

    I didn’t say that as it would be worse than a lie. I also note that Catholics are on the move in America in opposing Globalism which includes more than defending their faith. But what I said, needs to be said. It is, after all, totally in line with the nonsense going on at the Catholic University where a student can have a platform to push an openly Tribal set of Globalist Agendas. Everyone, Catholics included, particularly those from Catholic universities, should debate Jews. But not in that context, meaning the debate shouldn’t be fraternal, but much sharper, particularly identifying from where the arguments are coming.

    BTW, it’s a stretch to say that Protestantism was “anything goes”. In many ways, even in the earlier period, it was more restrictive than Catholicism. Just not in the area of sexuality. And that applied only to some branches of a very broad church.

    Thanks for your response.

  180. werpor says:
    @Father Coughlin

    I reread my post. I saw nothing about rape or about abortion there.

  181. JM says:

    You articulate many truths. Why don’t you adopt a “name” that gives some clue as to your identity?

  182. @Robert Dolan

    Thats funny because my circle of Catholic friends is very right wing and remembers the doctrine of supersessionism which prots and leftycaths have abandoned

  183. @anarchyst

    A defender of priestly paedophiles, TOO. What a peach you are!

    • Replies: @Bubba
  184. Seb says:

    Who says that race is defined by physical attributes? Biblically and historically, race has always been defined in terms of language and religion/beliefs. Therefore, I can assure you that I have much more in common with people of darker skin tone and large lips, who share my same religious beliefs, than with people who look identical to me but who unabashedly place with their words and actions a perpetual crown of thorns on Jesus Christ, the living God. You are right; your thinking is materialistic and totally inconsistent with reality.

    • Replies: @Anon
  185. Tucker says:

    Okay, I confess that I did not remember to include all rapes, regardless of the race of the rapist, to be included in my exceptions on the abortion issue for White females.

    However, being keenly aware of the devious and conniving nature of women – and knowing that there have been countless cases where women who consent to sexual relations, but decide later to wrongly accuse men of rape, for a wide variety of reasons – such as being angry that he just ‘pumped and dumped them’ or in situations where they see opportunities to extort money from the guy or simply out of a vindictive desire to ruin the guy’s life for whatever reason or maybe she wakes up the next morning and feels bad about what she did the night before, etc. Thus, when a White female claims she has been raped, there needs to be a proper and intensive investigation by competent and trustworthy authorities to verify her allegation.

    In other words, her claim should not be taken on blind faith. Otherwise, women who want to get abortions will just lie and say they were raped in order to qualify for the exemption. Which would lead to them killing a baby and ruining some poor guy’s life who they slept with most recently.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  186. anarchyst says:

    The problem is, women want it both ways.
    Women want the right to say no, even after enticing a man to be sexually active with her, even days, weeks, months, and years after the event.
    Her word is to be considered sacrosanct, and must be taken as truth without question, ruining many (innocent) men’s careers and even lives, as a result.
    Men are not permitted to have a defense against such accusations.
    Don’t get me wrong, I have no use for serial abusers such as Harvey Weinstein and other Hollywood, political and celebrity types; they deserve ostracization and severe punishment for their actions, BUT if women want true equality they must take responsibility for their own actions. They cannot have it both ways.
    All one has to do is look at the way Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was treated by the mainstream media, who gave his accuser Anita Hill a pass, even though she followed him from job to job, without any mention of harassment.
    Women want the same pay for equal work–not a problem in most cases, but if a woman cannot do the job, she then asks for special treatment because she is a woman, instead of realizing that she is not cut out for such work and should seek more suitable employment.
    Men die sooner than women as they do the most hazardous work.
    If women want to be treated as equals they have to step up to the plate and TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY for their own actions
    Multiculturalism, diversity and especially feminism are flawed concepts that equate to the serpent in the Garden of Eden. Of course it took a female of the species to coax the male into eating of the forbidden fruit.
    Another parallel example is that of the Tower of Babel in which separate cultures and languages developed.
    At the risk of offending the female of the species, there were reasons why women did not achieve suffrage (the right to vote) among other things. I realize that there are many intelligent women who do not subscribe to externalized altruism, but there are too many who do . . . Women have a altruistic streak, which is necessary in the formation and care of their families. However, this altruism has been externalized, helped along by our enemies, caring for outsiders while neglecting the good within the family structure in–internalized altruism. This externalized altruism has become deadly which has been put into the hands of feminists. This externalized altruism made the communistic, so-called civil-rights movement a (hollow) success (Actually, the so-called civil-rights movement is falling apart), along with the country).

    • Replies: @anon
    , @mulga mumblebrain
  187. @Anon

    I’m not sure how we got from my original reply to the article:

    This is the first time I’ve read or heard EMJ say that sodomy is a “Jewish sacrament.” That’s a notable step; I think it needs more documentation.

    to race and transgenderism, at least, I take it that’s what you mean by “troon.” I think that EMJ’s opposing categories (“category of the mind” vs. “category of reality”) might adequately address some of your comments regarding DNA, etc. But regarding what I think was your main point:

    After all, if it’s rational to believe that a man can come back from the dead, then why not believe that a boy can become a girl, or a Negro become white, or a (baptized) Jew become a good citizen? Anything can happen in the world o’ miracles E. Mike is hot to uphold as “reason.”

    resurrection is a fundamental tenet of religion, not race or biology. You could read Frazer’s The Golden Bough for about 3000 pages of documentation for the universality of the concept. Whereas EMJ’s pointing out that the various Catholic groups became “white” when they moved out of their more or less homogeneous city neighborhoods to suburban “America” seems pretty valid to me as a 3rd generation American of Italian descent.

    In any case, I’m still wondering where the leap to sodomy is a “Jewish sacrament” came from.

  188. Hibernian says:

    I have a modest proposal. Let’s repeal laws against theft (Thou shalt not steal.) and murder (Thou shalt not kill.) because of their religious basis. Oh wait, that’s what George Gascon, Larry Krasner, Kim Foxx, and Rachel Rollins have effectively begun to do already, on the installment plan, of course.

  189. Hibernian says:

    G-Town seems to have been accepted by the Establishment as a second rank not quite elite safety school.

  190. Hibernian says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    Somee people use the term “Catholic Calvinist” to refer to Catholics who, horror of horrors, actually believe in Original Sin.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  191. Anon[132] • Disclaimer says:

    Great point!
    I had great support on this ‘plandemic’ from a Father from the SSPX and it was quite an experience being in many masses there
    When the present woke pope supported the global depopulation “vaccine” (experimental GM poison) campaign i cutted my ties with him and my local church
    Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano should fit and thrive as a Pope for sure as his views are supra compared to that argentinian pro big pharma and woke

  192. Anon[132] • Disclaimer says:

    I was too compeled to answer the has bara tro ll but u did so well and historically correct as far as i know that i just wanna thank u for your response
    And i ad the fact that at present times almost all the banksters and pharma bosses along with the corrupt CDC and FDA are impregnated with that “religion” agents this is really bad for humanity as we can see the outcome of the whole world state of things, adverse reactions, deaths (not a fringe number), poverty, homelessness, disruption of food logistics and on and on and on
    They see the whole world who’s not them as enemies and haters, well the mirror of reflections says it all
    And the guy have the guts to write about envy from the rest of the world…
    He wish, i prefer have as a proud Christian one Muslin friend than of them by my side but luckly their numbers are so microscopic yet they do great damage to Humanity due their greed and ‘exclusiveness’
    Disgusting and dangerous folks, not all of them of course, as we see those in NY neihgbourhoods who support Palestine

  193. Blodgie says:

    Catholics are deeply full of shit.

    Hey Catholic fathers of young women: your sweet girl is getting banged on the regular by strangers, is on birth control and may have had an abortion her and your wife didn’t tell you about.

    In But Not Of my ass!

    Catholicism is shallow window dressing in 2022.

    • Replies: @CCG
  194. Anon[341] • Disclaimer says:

    I assume, then, that your behavior is consistent with your anti-racism and you have your being or are seeking to have it in a Christian neighborhood/school/parish that is Black instead of among secular humanists who are White. Or would this congruity between your religion and your physical life be materialism? The best we can hope for is that you are in fact a hypocrite, i.e., that you aren’t working to turn the nation into a Third World shit hole.

  195. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    You are quite right to refer to Kevin MacDonald and his invaluable work as treasurable and courageous. Moreover, in light of the three decades’ worth of vicious and dishonest abuse that he has endured with remarkable sangfroid, it wouldn’t be out of place to add the qualifier “thick-skinned” to the list of his attributes.

    With respect to your request that I pray for KM’s return to the Faith, I am glad to assure you that I have been doing so daily for many years. My prayers, I think, have a far better chance of contributing to that return than anything I might say or write. Although I am truly pleased, indeed touched, that you consider some of my comments persuasive, on any team where KM is the star pitcher, yours truly would be a utility infielder whose highest hope is not to be returned to Triple-A!

  196. @Hibernian

    I’ve heard the expression used, too. Unfortunately, the reflexive response to the kind of person who’d say such a thing is to wonder whether Calvin was really so bad after all. Now that’s a temptation that needs resisting!

  197. Anon[332] • Disclaimer says:

    “Semitical Correctness begins with Xtianity and its anti-biological claims.

    “If you accept virgin birth and just-kidding death, why wouldnt you acccept that race and sex dont exist.

    “The jews have established the principle that you’re weakminded and will go along with whatever a higher power tells you.” – Alex Linder

    You following Jones denegrate identifications of material reality as mere “categories of the mind.” Then you turn and treat the universality of the *concept* of resurrection as a proof resurrection is true. If anything is made up in people’s heads, it’s ressurection from the dead. That that fantasy is widespread means nothing. You can read the thousands of pages of Paglia’s Sexual Personae and the works of its bibliography to see that sexually perverted beliefs including transsexualism are as universal as the concept of ressurection, but this is no evidence of anything. The anti-biological fantasies of troons have no more grounding in reality than the anti-biological fantasies of Christians.

    If the Mind of God is called “reality” and thinking about the material world is called “mind,” meaning unreal, then any truth, such as mountains on the moon or the incompatibility of different races in the same nation, may be (and is) dismissed by the godly where it isn’t congruous with their God’s fantasy.

    The spiritual is real; the material is unreal, including thinking based on it. That’s Jones’s and the Catholic view.

    So why not pluck your gospel pipe out if offends thee, if you know by revelation that your “soul” is really female? Is the answer to that question the fact that another group of lunatics knows by revelation that you’re wrong?

    And that Dark Ages sewer of force and nescience is regarded by Jones et al. as the acme of “reason”! He is a true student of postmodernist (((Stanley Fish))) as well as of (((Paul))), isn’t he.

    As Voltaire wrote, “Crush the infamous thing,” meaning religious insanity must be extirpated, along with (((those))) who invented and exploit its dominant forms.

    As to who got up the notion of abortion’s being a jewish sacrament, I believe that it was no other than Jones himself. There was some infamous social media posting within the past month or so by some yenta or other who was celebrating unlimited access to abortion as a “jewish value,” and I think Jones simply took off from there.

  198. @Jiacovelli

    I’m still wondering where the leap to sodomy is a “Jewish sacrament” came from.

    I was puzzled by your puzzlement in the comment where you first expressed it, and I continue to fail to see what you find puzzling about the implicit analogy, which has no leaping quality in it that I can discern.

    Since the full effectuation of its subversion by Jews and Freemasons at Vatican II, the institutional church—better now called the Conciliar Church than the Catholic Church—has been in full flight from the frank and concise definition of a sacrament that every English-speaking Catholic child learned for several centuries prior to the council: “A sacrament is an outward [i.e., visible] sign instituted by Christ to give grace.” Thus, understood in this proper sense, a Jewish sacrament would be “an outward sign instituted to spite Christ and to defile God’s grace.”

    One need but listen for a maximum of five minutes to a Mayorkas, a Garland, a Schumer, or one of their goyishe epigones—e.g., Pelosi or Biden (either nowadays or when he was compos mentis)—to get the clear sense that they hold sodomy in the same high antisacramental regard that disciples of Satan hold any practice that degrades the character of the practitioner and distances him from God and eternal salvation.

    Now that some Jewish groups have joined NAMBLA in speaking openly of an adult’s penetrative sexual abuse of a child as a wonderful, beautiful, praiseworthy thing, I think that the day when the vile individuals named above or their successors both approve and practice sacrilegious defilement of the consecrated Host is not far off. After all, how many other possible escalations of degeneracy are left to them?

    • Agree: Bubba
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  199. @Pierre de Craon

    With respect to your request that I pray for KM’s return to the Faith, I am glad to assure you that I have been doing so daily for many years.

    So fortifying to know of such proactive faith, intellect and selfless awareness.

    God bless you in the name of His Divine Son Jesus.

    You contribution will help your Team Jesus win it all for the good of all but the devil.

  200. anarchyst says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    A person who is a jew and follows the tenets of his “faith” (I use that term loosely) must not only be an advocate for sodomy (three years and a day is OK) in their “book of rules”, the talmud, but must also condone present-day slavery of “goyim” which is also in the talmud.
    Jews are amoralistic.
    The writings in their talmud are concrete PROOF.
    Jewish supremacism knows no bounds.
    Let’s not forget “male genital mutilation” which is another central tenet in judaism.
    Keep in mind that every jewish “holy day” is a celebration of conquest, total annihilation of civilizations and genocide.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  201. anarchyst says:

    Actually “male genital mutilation” is a jewish “sacrament”.
    Removing a healthy body part without medical necessity is a crime which should be outlawed worldwide.
    If jews want to have it done, they can go to israel.

  202. @1jonny

    You seem to be on a good path. As I’m sure you know, addictions are easy to fall into and tough to break free of. The fact that you understand that you still have a ways to go tells me that you are likely to break completely free sooner rather than later.

    Speaking for myself, I was still watching more than an occasional pro football game as late as 2008. It was only when the (((owners))) of pro sports teams got players to follow Kaepernick in taking a knee, however, that I knew beyond the shadow of a doubt that a complete break was morally necessary for me. An old friend used to call such a turning point a Popeye Moment: “I takes what I can, and I can’t takes no more!”

    Here’s hoping that your Popeye Moment comes soon!

  203. MarylinM says:

    Why do some super-rich 80+ commies look so youthful and vigorous for the age? Have you seen the tits on some of them lately – at 82 ? Let’s not forget that abortism is not a religion, but a bidness. Bidness. One pound of stem cells from the brain of a freshly crushed skull can fetch as much as $1mln. Bon apetite.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  204. Please. Some American college president had zero to do with Vatican II etc. The Church revised everything except its teaching on human sexuality, with Paul VI overruling the council in that one, single area. Why? Because Paul was under the influence of closeted, woman-hating French homosexuals led by their guru, Jacques Maritain.

    The Church’s “never changing, eternal God-given” views on sexuality were written by postwar French homosexuals. Deal with it.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  205. Hibernian says:
    @James J. O'Meara

    Generally homosexuals and out of control heterosexuals are allied with each other and the Devil.

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon
  206. TGD says:


    In the wake of the midterm elections in Pennsylvania, I explained how a Jewish Katholikenfresser like Josh Shapiro could get elected governor in a state where the Catholic vote determined every election. The explanation was simple. When Catholic women had abortions and refused to repent, they became Jews because abortion is not only “a fundamental Jewish value,” it is also the Jewish sacrament of initiation which gets Catholic women to vote like Jews. The same is true of sodomy, the other Jewish sacrament, and the effect it has on celibate members of the clergy.

    In EMJ’s desultory writing style where he goes off on multiple tangents unrelated to his original theme, he brings up the subject of Josh Shapiro in the last sentence, the new governor elect of PA.

    Shapiro is an “observant” Jew, a keeper of the Shabbat and the laws of Kashrut. How he will kosherize the PA governor’s mansion I don’t know. As governor, he will be invited to attend many dinners. Will he bring along a can of tuna fish, a loaf of challah bread and a jar of kosher mayonnaise?

    His opponent was Doug Mastriano, an evangelical Christian who attends a Mennonite church. On the subject of abortion, Mastriano declared that abortion under all circumstances must be illegal. Shapiro said abortion must be legal up until the moment of birth.

    Mastriano lost by millions of votes.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  207. anarchyst says:

    It’s called “adrenochrome harvesting”. This sick jew-run “procedure” takes young children, subjecting them to extreme pain and other torture, while at the same time harvesting their blood. It is believed that extreme pain and torture is necessary to extract the maximum amount of adrenaline in the blood.
    This “young blood” is then transfused into these lecherous old jews (and others, world leaders, celebrities, etc.) who have money and the resources to brutally abuse these children.
    It would appear that there ARE life extending benefits in this “adrenochrome harvesting”. Sick…

  208. anon[140] • Disclaimer says:

    Interesting factoid. Bible stories are metaphors, not historic incidents. A Muslim once told me that in his religion, Adam ate the apple and was the guilty party. In any case, the traditional Bible story was bound to be indigestible to the literate ladies sooner or later, hence, not so good for men either. It all seems to depend on who gets to tell the tale.

    • Replies: @Seb
  209. @TGD

    Shapiro is an “observant” Jew, a keeper of the Shabbat and the laws of Kashrut.

    You seem to be saying that this Jew’s degeneracy should be winked at because of his halakhic correctness. Does he do kapparot (the chicken-waving thing) on Yom Kippur eve to rid himself of guilt for his Tribe’s crimes here and abroad?

  210. Seb says:

    Who are you to decide that the stories in the Bible are just metaphors?

    • Replies: @shadowy_figure
  211. @Seb

    Who are you to decide that the stories in the Bible are just metaphors?

    Who are you to tell us otherwise?

  212. CCG says:

    You would need to leave your retarded (((Anglo-American))) paradigm to discover Catholics who actually believe in their religion. Then your main problem will be also discovering that those Catholics don’t want you anywhere around them and they want you gone ASAP, they find you disgusting.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  213. Anon[274] • Disclaimer says:

    It never occurs to people nowadays to pay their own way, or to adhere to any concept of continence.

  214. @anarchyst

    Most Jews know NOTHING of the Talmud. You are insane, I hope you realise. Or are you sitting in some yeshiva, writing this garbage so as the condemn the sane among us by guilt by association?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  215. @anarchyst

    Lunatic Judeophobe, moronic anthropogenic climate destabilisation denier, and, now, maniacal misogyny mixed with racism and xenophobia. The full deck of cards.

  216. anarchyst says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    You are wrong.
    Jewish supremacy is ingrained in every jew from birth on.
    The “victimhood status” that jews claim is a feature, not a bug as it enforces the “uniqueness” and separateness that is required of all jews.
    It’s one of the oldest psychological “tricks” in human history, dehumanizing and marginalizing your enemies by declaring them to be “subhuman” or “livestock with lesser souls” placed on this earth “to serve the jews”.
    Your jewish supremacist con has been exposed by the likes of “Ye” and others. You jews could always plant a false “guilt trip” on goy whites, but when a black man finally speaks “truth to power”, you jews are defenseless, especially when threats are made by jews against Ye, threatening to claim that he is “mentally ill” for not doing what his jewish masters demand. The jig is up.
    Holocaustianity is going down in flames as well, hence the need to pass laws criminalizing any deviation from the “officially accepted beliefs” about this scam of the twentieth century.
    As much as you spout off from your IDF unit 8200 cubicle, you words are falling on more and more deaf ears.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  217. @Chriss

    Are you a female with natural born female genitalia? If so there are many men to choose from. It depends on what you want. Itz a females market out there. But you have to choose with intelligence and practicality.

  218. anarchyst says:


    Ye mentioned that his jewish trainer threatened Ye with the loss of his children and forced confinement in a mental institution if he did not obey his trainers demands.
    This is like the old jew-run soviet union where dissidents were deemed to be “mentally ill” and were forcibly confined in mental institutions.

  219. @CCG

    … Catholics who actually believe in their religion … don’t want you anywhere around them and they want you gone ASAP, they find you disgusting.

    As a practical matter and in the ordinary course of daily life, what you say is true. Neither I nor any other Catholic I know actively seeks out the company of people who abuse us or our religion.* Yet anyone who has ever whispered the brief prayer to the Blessed Mother that is often appended to the rosary, “Pray for all souls in need,” acknowledges that God writes off no one, and so neither should we, right up to the moment of his or her last breath.
    *There are always exceptions. Few of us would emulate SS. Isaac Jogues, Jean de Brébeuf, and the other North American Martyrs, who petitioned their superiors to be allowed to return to seventeenth-century Canada to try again to convert the savage Algonquins after several of them had survived unspeakable torture at the Indians’ hands. Blodgie may have a low opinion of us Catholics, but I’m grateful that he’s no Algonquin!

    • Agree: Liberty Mike
  220. Strike says:

    As soon as I saw name “Zeigler” my antenna went up. What’s he doing at fine Catholic university like ND. Definite spy and saboteur.

    • Replies: @CCG
  221. Bubba says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    You are punching down.

    There are far, far more pedophile teachers in the NYC public school district alone (and quite a number in the “Rubber Room” collecting full pay and benefits) and also the general U.S. population than the in U.S. Catholic priesthood – both numerically and percentage-wise.

    And the pedophilia among Brooklyn Orthodox rabbis is so astronomical that former NY State Assemblyman Senator Dov Hikind was outraged enough to speak out against it, but was quickly silenced.

    And please do not think I am defending the pedo RC priests – they should be excommunicated immediately and jailed for their crimes.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  222. JackieG says:

    There is only one thing you need to know about Jews.
    Jews are fundamental liars.
    They lie mercilessly even to themselves.
    Jews lie about everything.
    Meaning by everything literally “every single thing”.
    You can’t have a simple truth from a Jew.
    Even, or the most insignificant thing.
    I guess there must be some psychiatric, anthropological and sociological explanations for that lying compulsive behavior.
    There’s no more racist and disgusting slogan than “the chosen people.”
    It looks like derived from that slogan, they are taught and trained in the synagogues not to try and do anything but oppress peoples.
    For that purpose they lie again and again.
    Jews give God a bad name.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  223. JackieG says:

    Are there any Jews in the Biden administration?


    Ron Klain Chief of Staff
    Janet Yellin Secretary of Treasury
    Alejandro Mayorkas Secretary of Homeland Security
    Tony Blinken Secretary of State
    Merrick Garland Attorney General
    Jared Bernstein Council of Economic Advisers
    Rochelle Walensky Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Wendy Sherman Deputy Secretary of State
    Anne Neuberger Deputy National Security Adviser for Cybersecurity
    Jeffrey Zients COVID-19 Response Coordinator
    David Kessler Co-chair of the COVID-19 Advisory Board and Head of Operation Warp Speed
    David Cohen CIA Deputy Director
    Avril Haines Director of National Intelligence
    Rachel Levine Deputy Health Secretary
    Jennifer Klein Co-chair Council on Gender Policy
    Jessica Rosenworcel Chair of the Federal Communications Commission
    Stephanie Pollack Deputy Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration
    Polly Trottenberg Deputy Secretary of Transportation
    Mira Resnick State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regional Security
    Roberta Jacobson National Security Council “border czar”
    Gary Gensler Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman*
    Genine Macks Fidler National Council on the Humanities
    Shelley Greenspan White House liaison to the Jewish community
    Thomas Nides U.S. Ambassador to Israel
    Eric Garcetti U.S. Ambassador to India [to be confirmed]
    Amy Gutmann U.S. Ambassador to Germany
    David Cohen U.S. Ambassador to Canada
    Mark Gitenstein U.S. Ambassador to the European Union
    Deborah Lipstadt Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism
    Jonathan Kaplan U.S. Ambassador to Singapore
    Marc Stanley U.S. Ambassador to Argentina
    Rahm Emanuel U.S. Ambassador to Japan
    Sharon Kleinbaum Commissioner of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom
    Dan Shapiro Adviser on Iran
    Alan Leventhal U.S. Ambassador to Denmark
    Michael Adler U.S. Ambassador to Belgium
    Michèle Taylor U.S. Representative to the United Nations Human Rights Council
    Jonathan Kanter Assistant Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division
    Jed Kolko Under Secretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs at the Department of Commerce
    Aaron Keyak Deputy Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism
    Stuart Eizenstat Special Adviser on Holocaust Issues
    Steven Dettelbach Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
    Amos Hochstein Bureau of Energy Resources Special Envoy
    Eric Lander Science and Technology Adviser
    *Nominated by Biden but serves a five-year term and not technically a member of the administration.

  224. anarchyst says:

    …all caused by jewish practices including…
    …male genital mutilation.
    …metzitzah b’peh introduced STDs to the infant.
    …child rape and homosexual rape of children condoned in the talmud.
    …eternal victimhood reinforced from birth on.
    …mental illnesses caused by male genital mutilation, metzitzah b’peh, child rape, homosexuality and victimhood.
    All of the above practices are not only condoned but encouraged in judaism.
    jewish supremacy? Yeah, right…

  225. @Bubba

    … please do not think I am defending the pedo RC priests – they should be excommunicated immediately and jailed for their crimes.

    Thanks, Bubba, for your splendid comment.

    It should also be noted that there have been more sexual deviants found within both the priesthood and the hierarchy during the past fifty years than during the prior two centuries. Yet the enemies of the Cross are always ready and eager to use sinners of the present to slander saints of the past.

    Homosexuality and child molestation: still more fruits of Vatican II!

    • Thanks: anarchyst, Bubba
  226. Che Guava says:

    own-penned long-winded articles

    I agree. Also, his disparaging remarks have been about commentors.

    All that he says about the writers is that he disagrees with much of the writing.

  227. Penis says:
    @Brás Cubas

    Wait where did he say that?

  228. CCG says:

    I felt the same way when I saw the name “Shri Thakur”. Hindus used their overwhelming numbers to infiltrate and subvert almost all Christian educational institutions in India last century into teaching secularism (a.k.a. “moral science”), or even Hinduism outright, instead of Christianity – in spite of the objections raised by Christian parents and Christian students. Hindu immigrants were also at the forefront for the legalization of abortion in Ireland.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All E. Michael Jones Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement