The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewE. Michael Jones Archive
HBO's "The Plot Against America"
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Fear” is the first word of The Plot against America, the Philip Roth novel which just got re-cycled as an HBO series by David Simon and Ed Burns, creators of The Corner, The Wire, and Generation Kill. “Fear,” Roth tells us, “presides over these memories, a perpetual fear.” The memories in question are Roth’s, of growing up in a Jewish family in Newark, New Jersey. The fear comes from the one alteration of history that turns these memories into what Roth referred to in an interview with Robert Siegel on NPR as “a kind of false memoir.” The premise of the novel is that Charles Lindbergh was elected president in 1940. Everything else in the book follows from that premise and from Roth’s ethnic paranoia and his ethnic bigotry. The most significant thing about Roth’s book is the fact that it’s fiction. The Plot against America is a Jewish fantasy, which is interesting first of all for what it tells us about Roth personally but also because of what it tells us about the ethnic group which has accepted his paranoid Jewish fantasy as something to be taken seriously by people other than psychiatrists and cultural pathologists.


To give an early example of the kind of fear which pervades the novel, seven-year-old Philip sees a German beer garden on a trip to Union, New Jersey, the town his father is thinking of moving the family to take advantage of a promotion at the insurance firm where he is employed. What follows is the 71-year-old’s bigotry projected into the mind of his seven-year-old name-sake. What ordinary Americans might consider “the homey acre of open-air merriment smack in the middle of town” was in fact some-thing “called a beer garden.” and before you know it the beer garden becomes the American equivalent of Auschwitz according to the following logic: “the beer garden had something to do with the German-American Bund, the German American Bund had something to do with Hitler, and Hitler, as I hadn’t to be told, had everything to do with persecuting Jews.” The beer garden was the place where Americans drank “the intoxicant of anti-Semitism. That’s what I came to imagine them all so carefully drinking in their beer garden that day—like all the Nazis everywhere, downing pint after pint of anti-Semitism as though imbibing the universal remedy.” All this passes through the mind of an allegedly seven-year-old child while driving past in a car.

Roth’s book is some indication that anti-Semitism is the universal remedy, but not in the way that Roth indicates. Charges of anti-Semitism have become the universal remedy to unwelcome discourse. They are also the universal remedy to an accurate history of the 20th century. As evidence of the anti-Semitism which was raging in America on the eve of America’s entry into World War II (and also of unwelcome discourse which got silenced), Roth cites Charles Lindbergh’s Des Moines radio speech at an America First rally; in fact, he gives the entire speech in an appendix to the book. This is a mistake, at least from the point of view of what Roth wants to achieve, because it says the opposite of what Roth wants Lindbergh to say. In the speech we read, among other things, Lindbergh’s statement; “No person with a sense of dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany,” This does not sound like the raving of an anti-Semite. Lindbergh’s point was that three groups were trying to get America into the War at the time—the Roosevelt administration, the English, and the Jews—and that the Jews “would be the first to feel its consequences” because “tolerance cannot survive war and devastation.” It was the last time that anyone in public life in America singled out Jews as a group for criticism. Lindbergh and America First were silenced after the Roosevelt administration entered the war, and they have been demonized ever since. Roth’s book is one more contribution to that demonization.

If Lindbergh was talking about Europe, however, he was profoundly right in a way that no one could have understood at the time. War provided the cover for the annihilation of large numbers of Jews in Europe. If Lindbergh was talking about America, he was wrong because—pace, Mr. Roth—there were no pogroms in America. So which Lindbergh is Philip Roth talking about? He is talking about the Lindbergh in his mind, a fictional prop that is dragged out to justify Roth’s hatred of the goyim and his deep ambivalence toward an America that, even more than Renaissance Poland, has been the paradisus Judaeorum. The ambivalence comes out best in an argument between Roth’s parents. Roth’s father is outraged by the programs of President Lindbergh, shouting “This is our country,” Roth’s mother, on the other hand, responds by saying, “Not anymore. It’s Lindbergh’s. It’s the goyims’. It’s their country.” In other words, the book revolves around the unhealthy dichotomy—it’s our country/it’s their country—without any understanding of why the dichotomy is unhealthy. Roth’s book is exactly what he says it is. It is a “false memoir.” It is a distortion of history for political and racial purposes. It is also an exercise in bigotry and slander. Anything is justified because Roth considers his foes the embodiment of evil and as fully worthy of the hatred he lavishes on them. Roth is no longer promoting sexual liberation, as he did in Portnoy’s Complaint, but the hatred and bigotry are still there, even if the twisted humor is gone.

Because it is a “false memoir,” Roth’s book is the mirror image of what was really going on. If there was such a thing as fascist America, it was created by Roth’s hero Franklin Delano Roosevelt. If there were ever “a plot to replace American democracy with the absolute authority of a despotic rule” in America, Roosevelt inaugurated it, and the presidents who have succeeded him simply implemented what he inaugurated.

The first program which creates indignation among the Roth family is Lindbergh’s “Just Folks Program,” which sends Jewish children off to places like Kentucky—one of the two centers of evil in Roth’s America (the other is Detroit), where Philip’s brother works on a tobacco farm near Danville. “The only purpose of this so-called Just Folks,” Roth tells us, “is to make Jewish children into a fifth column and turn them against their parents.”

Well, that sounds like a plausible explanation of the purpose behind a government program of this sort. But just who was proposing this sort of the thing in the 1930s? The answer is just about everyone in power at the time. The Nazis had their Hitlerjugend, but unmentioned in Roth’s account is that Stalin’s Comsomol was doing the same sort of thing, and unmentioned as well is the fact that “Just Folks” bears an eerie resemblance to the Civilian Conservation Corps, which was, of course, instituted by Roosevelt. According to Roth’s fantasy, Jews “were being coerced to be other than the Americans we were.” Lindbergh had ordered that Jews were “to be shipped thousands of miles from family and friends. . . . The Jews will be scattered far and wide to wherever Hitlerite America Firsters flourish.”

Louis Wirth and Ethnic Cleansing

If this sounds vaguely familiar, it is because this sort of thing did happen in America at around the same time Roth’s novel takes place, but it was done by the Roosevelt administration and not by some fictional Lindbergh, and because it was done to other ethnic groups, not to Jews. The Plot Against America is the Jewish version of Through the Looking Glass; everything is pretty much the same, but politically reversed. The American government never rounded up Jews, but it did round up and inter Japanese Americans on the West Coast. Roth’s hero, Roosevelt, like Roosevelt’s hero Stalin, engaged in active ethnic cleansing at the time the novel takes place. The great theoretician of ethnic cleansing in America was Louis Wirth, a Jew who was also a sociologist at the University of Chicago and an admirer of Stalin as a man who based his solution to the nationalities problem in the Soviet Union on the highest moral principles. The genocide in the Ukraine was directed by another Jew, Lazar Kaganovich, who also ran the Gulag Archipelago for Stalin long after that worthy had purged less subservient Jews like Trotsky from the Communist Party. So to translate from the Jewish version of Through the Looking Glass back to reality, Roth is accusing the America Firsters of perpetrating on Jews what the Jewish agents of Stalin and Roosevelt were actually perpetrating on other ethnic groups, most notably the Japanese and the Catholic ethnics in America, and the Ukrainians, the Volga Deutsch, the Kalmyks, and many others in the Soviet Union. The psychologists call this projection, and it is usually associated with guilt, but more on that later.

The next step in President Lindbergh’s attempt “to establish the ‘American Fascist New Order,’ a totalitarian dictatorship modeled on Hitler’s,” is known as “the Good Neighbor Project,” which is a government program “designed to introduce a steadily increasing number of non-Jewish residents into predominantly Jewish neighborhoods and in this way ‘enrich’ the ‘Americanness’ of everyone involved.” Being a boy wise beyond his years, seven-year-old Philip understands that “the underlying goal” of the Good Neighbor Project “was to weaken the solidarity of the Jewish social structure as well as to diminish whatever electoral strength a Jewish community might have in local and congressional elections.” In order to bring this about in Newark, where the Roths lived at the time, “Flats vacated in September . . . were occupied by Italian families up from the First Ward. Essentially their new living quarters had been assigned to them by out-right government edict. By the next time that Lindbergh would run for president “a Christian majority might well be dominant in at least half of America’s twenty most heavily populated Jewish neighborhoods as early as the start of Lindbergh’s second term and a resolution of America’s Jewish Question close at hand, by one means or another.”

If all of this sounds vaguely familiar, it’s because it did happen in America, but it didn’t happen under Lindbergh, and it didn’t happen to the Jews. As I have shown in detail in The Slaughter of the Cities: Urban Renewal as Ethnic Cleansing, the Office of War Information, under the guidance of people like Louis Wirth and Archibald MacLeish, had inaugurated a campaign moving black sharecroppers from the South into government-funded housing projects which were deliberately built in Catholic ethnic neighborhoods, “to weaken the solidarity of the [Catholic] social structure as well as to diminish whatever electoral strength a [Catholic] community might have in local and congressional elections.”

In other words, to paraphrase the title of the Sinclair Lewis novel which served as Roth’s model, it could happen here. In fact, it did happen here, but in a way that was the mirror-image of the story presented in Roth’s novel. No one ever singled out the Jews for ethnic cleansing in America, but Louis Wirth, the Jew, was orchestrating the destruction of Catholic neighborhoods, by precisely the methods Roth mentions in his Good Neighbor Project. Confronted by the prospect of the ethnic cleansing of his neighborhood, young Philip Roth vows that “Nothing would ever get me to leave here. . . . would not be driven by the United States government from a street whose very gutters gushed with the elixir of life.” Of course, Philip and his Family were driven from their home in Newark by the very people who are the heroes of his book—There are still good men in this country. There is Roosevelt, there is Ickes, there is Mayor La Guardia.” But they were not driven from their homes by government orchestrated black migration because they were Jews. They were driven out of Newark because they were still vaguely ethnic, even if they supported the war against fascism, and they were driven to live in the suburbs which Roth describes in Good-bye, Columbus to make them ‘’white.” In this regard Roth pere is more prescient than Roth fils when he says, “this is what it is like to work for a big company. Big companies transfer people all the time.” That was William H. Whyte’s point in The Organization Man, and it was Whyte who talked about the suburbs as agents of Americanization for unassimilated ethnics.


So Roth can criticize social engineering of the sort that destroyed his childhood neighborhood, but he can’t bring himself to criticize the people who orchestrated it. That would interfere with his political and racial agenda, which depends on his desire to demonize his enemies and beatify his friends. It would interfere with his hatred, which is to say, the source of his creativity. So he decides to blame the victim instead. Roth blames the people who were against America’s entry into World War II for all of the social engineering, ethnic cleansing, and social disruption which the war was used to justify. So when an FBI agent arrives to interrogate the seven-year-old Philip, he tells us that he:

knew enough not to mention Henry Ford, America First, the Southern Democrats or the isolationist Republicans, let alone Lindbergh. Over the past few years, the list I heard at home of the prominent Americans who hated Jews was far longer than that, and then there were the ordinary Americans, tens of thousands of them, maybe millions of them, like the beer drinkers we didn’t want to live beside in Union

Like many Jews, Roth subscribes to the dogma that anti-Semitism is a pathology whose source is Christianity and which is, therefore, inseparable from Christianity. As a result, anti-Semitism has no relationship to Jewish behavior. Jews are hated for no reason at all. As a result, anti-Semitism, because of its very irrationality, can break out at any time and at any place, even in America, where Jews, as Rabbi Daniel Lapin never tires of saying, never had it better.

If we move from Roth’s version of Through the Looking Glass to historical reality, we find that the animosity against Jews in both Europe and America had quite definite historical causes. Lindbergh, to cite Roth’s chief villain, felt that the Jews were a “danger to this country” because 1) they were driving it to war and 2) because of “the large ownership and influence on our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.” In the speech which he gave to an America First rally in Des Moines, Iowa on September 11, 1941, Lindbergh did not single out the Jews. Instead he listed them along with the English and the Roosevelt Administration as one of the three groups that were determined to get the country into a war with Germany. Lindbergh went on to say, that

I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.

Like Lindbergh, Henry Ford, another of Roth’s villains, had his reasons as well. Ford characterized Jews as the world’s Bolsheviks who were largely responsible for spreading the revolution to Germany. He also felt they were responsible for the Revolution in Russia. Like Lindbergh and Ford, Father Charles Coughlin of Royal Oak, Michigan had his reasons too, but they, again are not enumerated by Roth.

In one of the more bizarre flights of fantasy in Plot, Walter Winchell, the character assassin and gossip columnist, runs for president after he is driven off the air by Lindbergh’s forces. This, predictably, drives the anti-Semites into paroxysms of rage, especially when he appears in Catholic parishes: “Winchell proceeded to draw an angry mob chanting ‘Kike, go home!’ in every single parish where he displayed his stigmata to the faithful,” is how Roth puts it. Equally predictable is the fact, that Winchell, who “had become an out-and-out god and more important by far than Adonoy” to Roth, would unleash “the worst and most widespread violence . . . in Detroit,” because Detroit was “the midwestern headquarters of the “Radio Priest” Father Coughlin and his Jew-hating Christian Front.” Just for the record here, the Christian Front was headed by a Father Brophy from Brooklyn, but facts like that are not important when writing a “false memoir.”

Other facts concerning the Radio Priest are equally unimportant. Roth links Coughlin with the Ku Klux Klan, when in fact the Radio Priest began his shrine after the Klan had burned a cross on the lawn of his church in Royal Oak. The rioting, which Coughlin allegedly incited, according to Roth, “had begun at Winchell’s first stop in Hamtramck (the residential section inhabited chiefly by auto workers and their families and said to contain the world’s largest Polish population outside Warsaw).” Hamtramck was not far from St. Louis the King parish, also home to Polish Catholic ethnics, who had become the beneficiaries of government-sponsored black migration to dilute the ethnic character of the neighborhood—a la Roth’s “Good Neighbor’s Project”—as well as federal troops when the Poles refused to go along. From Hamtramck, according to Roth’s account in Plot, the rioting spread to “the city’s biggest Jewish neighborhoods, shops were looted and widows broken, Jews trapped outdoors were set upon and beaten and kerosene-soaked crosses were ignited on the lawns of the fancy houses along Chicago Boulevard.” It was, in other words, the American version of Kristallnacht—something which, of course, never happened in America in spite of the fact that in 1943 Detroit was the scene of the deadliest race riot in American history.

When it comes to fiction, the reader is supposed to make a “willing suspension of disbelief,” but at this and other points in Roth’s novel, the reader rebels—perhaps because he recognizes that Roth is not intent on telling any kind of truth in his novel, unless he is forced to tell the truth in spite of himself— after being manipulated by passages like the following:

By nightfall, several hundred of the city’s 30,000 Jews had fled and taken refuge across the Detroit River in Windsor, Ontario, and American history had recorded its first large-scale pogrom, one clearly modeled on the “spontaneous demonstrations” against Germany’s Jews known as Kristallnacht . . . which Father Coughlin in his weekly tabloid Social Justice, had defended at the time as a reaction by the Germans against “Jewish-inspired Communism.”

To begin with, Father Coughlin did not defend Kristallnacht. He deplored it for what it was. We know this because he devoted a radio program to it on November 20, 1938 entitled “Persecutions: Jewish and Christian.” Coughlin deplored the violence against the innocent, but he did so in terms that Jews had been formulating for years. “The Trotskys make the revolution,” said one rabbi, “but the Bronsteins are the ones who pay for it.” The Jews who were visible paid for the excesses of the Jewish Bolsheviks who had changed their names and engaged in the behavior which had caused the precipitous rise of anti-Semitism in the ’20s and ’30s. In a speech approved by his ordinary, Father Coughlin called on his radio audience “to oppose all persecution, wherever it may originate.” Unlike Roth, who sees history as a pretext to inflame ethnic prejudice, Coughlin first condemned the violence and then tried to explain why it happened. That meant dealing with its historical context; that, in turn, meant dealing with Bolshevism, and that, in turn, meant dealing with the Jews. Coughlin felt that the rise of Hitler and the concomitant rise of the Nazi Party to power in Germany was directly related to the Communist menace, which had been raging throughout eastern Europe and Germany ever since the collapse of the great empires in 1919.

He was not alone in this regard. Ruth Fischer claimed that Munich would never have become the birthplace of Nazism without the Bolshevik revolution, which erected the Soviet Republic of Bavaria there in the early ’20s. Eugenio Pacelli (later Pope Pius XII) was living there at the time as the German nuncio. After visiting the headquarters of the Kurt Eisner government in the Wittelsbach palace, he reported that he had come across a group of women there, whose leader was “Levine’s lover, a young Russian, a Jew, and divorced” (l’amante di Levien: una giovarte russa, ebrea, divorziata), It was the wretched excesses of the Soviet Republic in Munich which “outraged the people and caused a dramatic increase in anti-Semitism.” As before in Russia, all Jews were blamed for the excesses of the revolutionary few. The Bronsteins were paying the price for the Trotskys.

The same thing was true of Austria after the war. In his book The Truth about Austria, Guido Zernattos claimed that “the most important basis for modern Austrian anti-Semitism was the part which the Jewish intellectuals played in the leadership of the social democratic party.”

Marxism an intellectual posture

Unlike Roth, who manipulates historical events like Kristallnacht for political effect, Coughlin tried to explain why it happened, and that involved seeing Kristallnacht and the rise of Hitler in their historical context as a reaction against the excesses of Bolshevism, a revolutionary movement which was seen as quintessentially Jewish. In his November 20 speech, Coughlin addresses the Jews directly, asking them to “be not indulgent with the irreligious, atheistic Jews and Gentiles who promote the cause of persecution in the land of the Communist; the same ones who promote the cause of atheism in America.” The time had come for condemnations of the excesses of both sides. Gentiles must repudiate the excesses of Nazism. But Jews and Gentiles must repudiate the existence of Communism from which Nazism springs.” By linking Jews and Bolshevism, Coughlin earned the ire of a group of people which, as evidenced by Roth’s book, continued to smear him as a Jew-hater and Nazi-sympathizer to the present day. Bur what he had to say then was often mentioned by people who would not normally be associated with anti-Semitism, namely the Jews themselves. Leopold Trepper, the leader of the “Rote Kapelle,” the Nazi resistance group that functioned between 1933 and 1939, said it most succinctly when he explained, “I became a communist, because I am a Jew.” (“Ich wurde Kommunist, weil ich Jude bin.”)

The quote comes from Johannes Rogalla von Bieberstein’s book “Juedischer Bolschewismus”: Mythos und Realitaet (SC H Nellroda: Edition Antaios, 2004). Von Bieberstein’s book appeared in the same year as Roth’s, but you will not find it at Borders or Barnes and Noble, where Philip Roth’s book is so prominently displayed. In fact, unless you read German, you won’t be able to read it all because, like Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s history of the Jews in Russia, Two Hundred Years Together, it has not been translated into English. Von Bieberstein’s book is the antithesis of Roth’s “false memoir.” Roth panders to racial prejudice; von Bieberstein marshalls facts and appeals to reason. He has written, as a result, a well-documented piece of history that shows 1) that Bolshevism was a Jewish phenomenon and 2) that it created a wave of anti-Semitic reaction which swept Hitler into power in Germany. Unlike Daniel Goldhagen, who writes histories based on Jewish fictions, and unlike Philip Roth, who writes Jewish novels based on fictitious history, von Bieberstein has written an account of the myths and realities surrounding a topic whose very mention, in the world of Roth and Goldhagen, is prima facie evidence of anti-Semitism. Both Goldhagen and Roth subscribe to the most basic tenet of Jewish ideology, namely, that anti-Semitism has nothing to do with Jewish behavior. That premise turns all history into a form of political mystification. Von Bieberstein de-mystifies the mystification by documenting in exhaustive detail the role which Jewish Bolshevism played in the rise of Hitler. According to von Bieberstein, Father Coughlin criticized Nazism, but saw it nonetheless as “a defense mechanism against communism.” In this regard, he differed little from Henry Ford, who feared Jews primarily because he felt they were the leading force in spreading revolution throughout the world.

That fact makes its way via Roth’s Looking Glass into Plot in the following way:

As an anti-Communist rather than a pro-Nazi organization, the Bund was as anti-Semitic as before, openly equating Bolshevism with Judaism in propaganda handouts . . . holding fast to the purposes enunciated in their official declaration on first organizing in 1936: “to combat the Moscow-directed madness of the red world menace and its Jewish bacillus carriers”. . . . Gone were the wall banners pro-claiming “Wake up America—Smash Jewish Communists!”

By stating his cast this way, Roth gives the impression that anyone who linked Jews and Communism was a raving Nazi anti-Semite, but this was not the case. Ford, as even a cursory reading of von Bieberstein’s book makes clear, was not alone in feeling that Jews played a leading role in Bolshevism. In May of 1919, Woodrow Wilson—no isolationist he!—proclaimed that the Bolshevik movement was led by Jews.” At around the same time, in an article in the Illustrated London News, Winston Churchill, the same man who sent Intrepid to America to get it involved in World War II and so presumably one of Philip Roth’s heroes, said much the same thing. In 1919, Arnold Zweig, who like Arthur Koestler was both a Zionist and a Communist wrote, that “Jewish blood” gave birth to socialism “from Moses to Lindauer.” In his magnum opus, Das Prinzip Hoffnung, the Jew Ernst Bloch said the same thing in even pithier form when he wrote, in a parody of the Roman saying, “Ubi Petrus, Ibi Ecclesia,” “Ubi Lenin, Ibi Jerusalem.” Elie Wiesel wrote that, “We have to make revolution, because God told us to. God wants us to become communists.” In 1848, Adolf Jellinek wrote that “reactionaries denounce Jews as the perpetuum mobile of the revolution.” In his book, Der grosse Basar, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, one of the leaders of the ’68 Revolution, referred to Trotsky as “embodying the essence of the Talmudic Jew.” In 1934, in his book, Katholizismus und Judentum, Bela Bangha, the Hungarian Jesuit wrote that “revolutionary Marxism” corresponded “in its essence to a particular form of the Jewish soul and his intellectual posture.” On December 14, 1918, the American Literary Digest asked the question, “Are Bolshewiki mainly Jewish?” Two years later, on June 19, 1920, under the title of “The Jewish Peril,” the Christian Science Monitor referred to an alleged world-wide Jewish conspiracy as demonstrated by the newly discovered, and subsequently discredited, Protocols of the Elders of Zion. On the very same day, the Chicago Tribune referred to Bolshevism as “an instrument for Jewish control of the world.”

Jews were no less inclined to speak this way than the goyim. In 1921 A. Sachs wrote that, “Jewish Bolshevism has demonstrated to the entire world that the Jewish race is nor suffering from degeneracy.” In 1990 in his book Stalin’s War Against the Jews, Louis Rapoport wrote that “men of Jewish heritage,” laid “the foundation for Communism and Socialism.” Franz Werfel, the man who wrote The Song of Bernadette, and who took part in the communist insurrection in Vienna in 1919, wrote an article entitled “Israel’s Gift to Mankind,” in which he said that “Moses Hess, Karl Marx and Ferdinand Lasalle” were the “church fathers of Socialism.” Jacob Toury claimed that socialism grew out of traditional Judaism among the uprooted as substitute religion. In an article entitled “The Jewish Revolutionary,” which appeared in the Neue Juedischen Montsheften toward the end of 1919, the author stated that “no matter how the issue is exaggerated by the anti-Semitic side and no matter how anxiously it is denied by the Jewish bourgeoisie, the huge Jewish participation in the contemporary revolutionary movment is a simple fact.” One year later, Franz Kafka, the famous German-speaking Jew from Prague, wrote, “You don’t forgive the Jewish socialists and communists. You drown them in the soup and slice them up when you’re roasting them.” (“Den juedischen Sozialisten und Kommunisten verzeiht man nichts, die ertraenkt man in der Suppe und zerschneidet man beim Braten.”)

Polish Nobel laureate, Isaac B. Singer, who spoke Polish only with difficulty and won the Nobel Prize in literature for writing in Yiddish, claimed that “the communists in Warsaw were almost exclusively Jews, and that they brought fire and sword to all parties. They also claimed [after the October revolution] that social justice could only be found in Russia.” Bundespresident Friedrich Ebert claimed that Jews were the people responsible for the revolution in Germany and that “practically every Jew was a crypto-Bolshevik.” In 1904, the German Zionist Franz Oppenheimer remarked that “nothing is more certain than that the contemporary Jew in eastern Europe is a born revolutionary.” What followed from this all but universal recognition of Jewish participation in Bolshevism was an unprecedented wave of anti-Semitism. What made a racist organization like the Thule society a dangerous threat was precisely the widespread consensus that “there was no such thing as Bolshevism without Jews.”

As Erich Haberer makes clear, Jews had been the backbone of the revolutionary movement in Russia. The social dislocation among the central powers which followed defeat after World War I, allowed the revolutionary movement to achieve it greatest successes. The Jews could now avenge themselves on the traditional Christian monarchies which had always persecuted them. The Jews, according to Michael Lerner “were enthusiastic representatives of the collapse of traditional communities because those communities discriminated against Jews.” Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter maintain that “the goal of the Jewish radicals was to alienate the Christians from their society just as the Jews had been alienated from those same cultures.” In 1849, in Israels Herold, Karl Ludwig Bernays explained that “The Jews took revenge on a hostile world in a completely new way . . . by liberating mankind from every religion and any kind of patriotic sentiment.” In the November 30, 1917 issue of The Jewish Chronicle, Trotsky was described “as the Avenger for Jewish suffering and humiliation” under the Czars.”

Von Bieberstein’s survey of the contemporary literature on the revolutionary movement in the period around World War I indicates that Jewish involvement was bound up with the Jewish attraction to messianic politics. Houston Stewart Chamberlain, the English racial theorist who married into the Wagner family and became a supporter of Hitler, reproached “Jewish atheists” for “planning an impossible socialistic and economic messianic kingdom without any regard for the fact that in process of doing this they would bring about the destruction of the civilization and culture which we have so laboriously erected.” Ernst Bloch, who described himself in 1918 as a “race conscious Jew,” described the promethean project of the revolutionary Marxists as nothing less than a “second incarnation.” In similar fashion, Eugen Hoeflich, the literary critic from Vienna who later changed his name to Mose Y. BenGavriel, wrote that “the Bolshevik Jew want[s] to set Europe in flames, not to fill his pockets but because he is driven by the purest idea, an idea which manifests an error which will lead to tragic consequences, which came about from a mass psychosis born of the war.”

The Russian Revolution of 1917 was bad enough, but it had nowhere near the psychological effect on public opinion that its daughter revolutions—the short-lived soviet republics of Bavaria and Hungary—had on the populations of eastern Europe. Bela Kun did for the Jews in Hungary what Kurt Eisner did for the Jews of Germany; both men created a huge wave of anti-Semitism in their respective countries. “Jew” became synonymous with “revolutionary,” and soon new labels like “Umsturzjuden,” “Revolutionsjuden,” as well as “RevoluZion” began to make the rounds. Led by Bela Kun, who magyarized his father’s name Kohn at the beginning of the 20th century, the Hungarian Soviet Republik spread fear and loathing among the native Hungarian population, which denounced it as the “Judenrepublik.” According to Lichter and Rothman’s book Roots of Radicalism, 30 of the 48 commissars in the Hungarian Soviet Republic were Jews. Of 202 top officials, 161 were Jews. This and other facts led the London Times to describe the Kun Regime as “Jewish Mafia” in 1919. “Bolshevism in Hungary,” according to Nathaniel Katzburg was “largely a Jewish enterprise.” Hence it was no surprise that the Soviet Republic in Budapest was denounced as “rule of the Jews” and “Judenrepublik.” Nor was it surprising that a wave of pogroms swept Hungary when the Soviet Republic fell there. The Bronsteins, once again, had to pay for the excesses of the Trotskys.

The same was true of Austria, where the dramatist Arthur Schnitzler in his diary described the revolutionaries as “a mixture of literary Jewboys, plundering rabble, and idiots.” The revolution in Hungary made headlines around the world. The net result was a rise in anti-Semitism, and not just in Hungary. In his book on the holocaust in Hungary, Rudolph Braham claimed that the “chiliastic passions” that promoted world revolution led inexorably to counter-revolution, and that the short but brutal communist regime left behind a bitter legacy which had devastating consequences for Hungarian Jews.

The Catholic Church in general and the Jesuits in particular were the main opponents of the revolutionary movement in the period leading up to and following World War I. As such, the Catholics were prominent—at this point in time, at least—in pointing out the large Jewish participation in the revolutionary movement. In an article which appeared in the October 21, 1922 issue of the officially recognized Vatican journal La Civiltà Cattolica entitled “La rivoluzione mondia e gli ebrei,” (World Revolution and the Jews), Communism was described as “the perversion of a Semitic fantasy” emanating “from the Jewish race.” in his 1926 book Judentum und Christentum, Father Erich Pryzwara, SJ, used quotes from Martin Buber and other Jewish thinkers to trace socialism back to its roots in Jewish messianism, forcing him to the melancholy conclusion that the Jew “is driven to become the tireless revolutionary of the Christian world by an inner necessity.” In the final analysis, the Jew is “driven to his tireless activism by his deepest religious convictions. He is truly the restless Ahasver.”

In similar fashion, the Polish bishops traced the Bolshevik fury that had been unleashed on eastern Europe in the wake of World War I back to the “traditional hatred” which Jews had always felt for Christendom. During Poland’s war with the nascent Soviet Union in 1920, the Polish bishops released a pastoral letter in which they announced that

The true goal or Bolshevism is world conquest. The race which has the leadership of Bolshevism in its hands . . . is bent on the subjugation of the nations . . . especially, because those who are the leaders of Bolshevism have the traditional hatred toward Christendom in their blood. Bolshevism is in reality the embodiment and incarnation of the Antichrist on earth.

Like the communist parties in Germany and Hungary, the Communist Party in Poland was overwhelmingly Jewish. Sixty-five percent of the Communists in Warsaw were Jews. ln the 1920s, the percentage was even higher, which again fueled anti-Semitism.

Since the German bishops shared the views of their Polish confreres, they got caught up in the same apocalyptic mood. The most famous episcopal opponent of Nazism, Clemens Graf von Galen, bishop of Muenster, wrote a pastoral letter defending Hitler’s incursion into the Soviet Union because it would rid the world of the “plague of Bolshevism.”

The Jewish inclination toward messianic politics explains the overrepresentation of Jews in revolutionary movements throughout the 20th century. Once Poland achieved statehood in the wake of the Versailles Treaty, the Jewish population in the Soviet Union dropped to around two percent of the population, which in turn dramatized the overrepresentation of Jews in the revolutionary parties in Russia. In this regard, the Bolsheviks, with 11 percent Jews, were the least Jewish of all the revolutionary parties, even though Jewish overrepresentation was five times as high as the Jewish population in Russia. The Social Revolutionary Party by comparison was 14 percent Jewish, and the Menshevik Party was 23 percent Jewish, with an overrepresentation ten times as high as the percentage of Jewish population in Russia.

If we turn to the leadership of the revolutionary movement, the overrepresentation of Jews is even more striking. Of the 21 members of the Central Committee of the Communist Party in Russia in August 1917, six, which is to say 28.6 percent, were Jews. The percentage was even higher among the Mensheviks, where eight of the 17 members of the Central Committee, which is to say just about 50 percent, were Jews. Of the list of the seven leading members of the Bolshevik leadership which Culture Commissar Anatoli Lunatcharsky compiled, four of the seven top Bolsheviks—Trotsky, Sverdlov, Sinovijev, and Kamanev—were Jews. When the Austrian foreign minister, Ottokar Graf Czernin, wrote about the peace negotiations which took place at Brest-Litovsk in the beginning of 1918, he reported that the Soviets were “practically without exception Jews with crazy ideas.” Jews achieved this overrepresentation in the new Soviet regime because Russians tended to be “patriotic” and therefore not ruthless enough in attacking fellow Russians, but also because the Jews, again unlike the Russian “peasants and workers” who formed the backbone of the proletarian movement, were highly literate. By way of illustration, the author of the book Rossija I Evrei, Russia and the Jews, told the following joke: “If six commissars are sitting at a table, what’s under the table? The answer, the twelve knees of Israel.”

The percentage of Jews on the staff of the hated Cheka was even higher. As late as July 10, 1934, eight years after Stalin’s takeover of the party, 34 percent of the leadership of the Cheka was still Jewish, a figure 17 times higher than the Jewish population of the Soviet Union. By 1939, however, after the purge of Jews in the party, the percentage sank to 4 percent.

Because of the high percentage of Jews in the revolutionary movements in eastern Europe and Germany, Bolshevism was perceived as a Jewish movement, and because it was so perceived, the excesses which it committed created a huge anti-Semitic reaction. On April 20, 1920, Allen Dulles, later head of the CIA, wrote that “as a result of the leading role which Bavarian Jews played in communist groups, the tolerance of the pre-war era has changed and a new strongly anti-Semitic movement has come into being.” Von Bieberstein writes that “a minority of radical Jews, fighting for the dictatorship of the Proletariat, set loose an avalanche of aggressive anti-Semitism.” Fearing precisely this reaction the Frankfurt lodge of the B’nai B’rith sent instructions to Bavarian Jews to distance themselves from Kurt Eisner and his Bavarian Soviet Republic. In an article on anti-Semitism in Britain, which appeared in the Jewish Journal of Sociology in 1989, Geoffrey Alderman wrote that “anti-Semitism flourished in the ’20s as a result of the fear of Bolshevism.” In his 1996 book Jews and the Russian Revolution, Harvard Historian Richard Pipes claimed that one of the “most disastrous consequences” of the Russian Revolution was “the identification of Jews with Communism.” Reinhard Maurach, a legal observer at the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, emphasized what he called a “combination theory,” according to which “the Jewish problem merged with the Bolshevik problem” to form the basic outline of Nazi doctrine.

Hitler rose to power in Germany because he convinced the overwhelming majority of the German people “that Jews and Bolsheviks were one and the same thing.” National Socialism was a reaction to communism. To ignore this fact or to write as Daniel Jonah Goldhagen does that “anti-Semitism has nothing to do with Jewish behavior” is to render an entire era incomprehensible. Saul Friedlander, likewise, said that “hatred for communism played a greater role in the rise of Hitler than anti-Jewish attitudes.”

Hitler was stymied at the beginning of his political career by both Jewish assimilation and German acceptance of that fact, and he could not have turned his followers against the Jews without the threat of Bolshevism in the background and the experience of the Bavarian Soviet Republic, which he referred to as “temporary Jewish rule,” as proof. In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote that “in 1918 it was still not possible to talk about programmatic anti-Semitism. I can still remember the difficulties one encountered as soon as the word Jew was mentioned. You were either looked at as if you were crazy or you encountered the stiffest resistance.” In 1933 Hitler told Max Planck, “I have nothing against the Jews qua Jews. But the Jews are all communists, and these are my enemies, and it is against them that I am fighting.” As evidence that anti-Communism trumped racism in Hitler’s hierarchy of values, von Bieberstein quotes Hitler’s saying, “Lieber sind mir 100 Neger im Saal, als ein Jude.” “Better a hundred Negroes in the room than one Jew.” In a diary entry for February 10, 1937, Hans Frank wrote, “I confess my belief in Germany . . . which is in truth God’s tool for the extermination of evil. We are fighting in God’s name against the Jews and their Bolshevism, God protect us.” Hitler always maintained that the Jew was his enemy primarily because the Jew spread revolution. In a table talk dated June 7, 1944, he was still maintaining that “without Jews there would be no revolution.” Nazi theoretician Alfred Rosenberg said much the same thing: “Bolshevism is in its essence the form of Jewish world revolution. . . . There is no such thing as Bolshevism without Jews.”

A reaction was inevitable. “The greater the successes of the communist movement,” Jonathan Frankel wrote in 1988, “the greater the anti-Communist hostility to the Jews became.” Hilaire Belloc claimed that “the revolution in Russia was the historical starting point of a renewal of the animosity against the Jews in western Europe.”

A Jewish film industry and a nation’s culture

Before long, the same reaction reached America. Von Bieberstein claims that the first signs of anti-Semitic reaction in “puritanical America” manifested themselves as a protest against the nascent film industry in Hollywood, an industry which was seen as created and controlled by Jews. In his book The International Jew, Henry Ford complained about the Jewish takeover of the Broadway theater. However, the Jews, he continued, never had “to drive the Gentiles out of” the film industry, “because the Gentiles never had a chance to get in it.” Ford claimed that “The motion picture influence of the United States, of the whole world, is exclusively under the control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulation of the public mind.” The Jews were able to subvert the morals of Americans because

the stage and the cinema represent the principal cultural element of 90 percent of the people. What the average young person absorbs as to good form, proper deportment, refinement as contested with coarseness, correctness of speech or choice of words, customs and feelings of other nations, fashion of clothes, ideas of religion and law, are derived from what is seen at the cinema and theater. The masses’ sole idea of home and life of the rich is derived from the stage and the movies (p. 153).

Any business, Ford continued, which “frankly brutalizes taste and demoralizes morals should not be permitted to be a law unto itself.” As a result of the twin threat of Jewish Bolshevism and Hollywood subversion of morals, many legislatures throughout the ’20s were threatening government imposed censorship of the movies. It was the threat of a boycott in 1934 that prompted Harry Warner to warn MGM executive Harry Rapf, whose son toured the Soviet Union in the summer of 1934, “I don’t want to talk to no g*d**** Communist. Don’t forget you’re a Jew. Jewish Communists are going to bring down the wrath of the world on the rest of the Jews.”

The wrath of the world, it turns out, was more benign in America than in Germany, but the reaction took place there as well. In America, it took the form of a boycott of the Warner theaters in Philadelphia. Organized by Cardinal Dougherty, the city’s Catholic bishop, the boycott was costing Warner \$100,000 a week in the depths of the Depression and causing him to weep “tears as big as horse turds” at corporate meetings. Warner and the rest of Hollywood’s Jewish moguls finally agreed to the Production Code as their way out of financial ruin.

Ford admired the Catholic resistance to Jewish Hollywood, even before the imposition of the Code. Unlike Protestant clergymen, who were regularly ridiculed in Hollywood films,

The Catholic clergy very soon made themselves felt in opposition to this abuse of their priestly dignity, and as a result of their vigorous resentment the Jew climbed down. You now never see a priest made light of on the screen. But the Protestant clergyman is still the elongated, sniveling, bilious hypocrite of anti-Christian caricatures.

Ford felt that the movies were the rehearsal for revolution in America. The Jews were using the screen as part of their “traditional campaign of subversion.” The movie screen also served “as a rehearsal stage for scenes of anti-social menace. There are no uprisings or revolutions except those that are planned and rehearsed. . . . Successful revolution must have a rehearsal. It can be done better in the motion pictures than anywhere else: this is the ‘visual education’ such as ever the lowest brow can understand.”

Before long it became clear that when the Jews came to America, they brought revolution with them. With a Jewish population which represented half the percentage of the Jewish population in Russia, America had a communist party in which over 50 percent of its members came from Jewish families. Many of these Jews changed their names when they came to America, where they continued their revolutionary activity, much to the consternation of people like Ford and Coughlin. Some of the Jewish revolutionaries were born in America and then traveled back to Russia. Israel Amter was born in the United States of America in 1881. In 1923 he traveled to Russia, where he became a member of the EKKI. He then changed his name to “John Ford” and returned to New York, where he led the communist party. ln 1921, Josef Pogany, former commissar under Bela Kun in the Hungarian Soviet Republic, joined the Komintern, which in 1922 shipped him off to America, where he took the name “John Pepper” and became de facto head of the Communist Party in America. A Ukrainian Jew by the name of Jacob Golos, under the cover name of “Timmy” created a spy network that included the Vassar-educated spy Elizabeth Bentley, who achieved her 15 minutes of fame when she testified before the McCarthy committee hearings in the ’50s.

Trotsky himself said that the Jews would play a decisive role in bringing the revolution to America. In an interview published in 1934 by the magazine Class Struggle, Trotsky claimed that “Jewish workers of foreign extraction will play a decisive role in bringing about the American proletarian revolution.” Is it any wonder that Henry Ford was upset? Anti-Bolshevist magazine wrote that the reaction against Russian Bolshevism was so great that it was causing “a new wave of anti-Semitism” even in America. Even in America, which had had no revolution of the sort that had taken place in Russia, Germany and Hungary, Louis Marshall noticed that the term “Jewish Communism” was making the rounds.

Given what happened in Europe in reaction to Jewish Bolshevism, the big unanswered question dogging Roth’s book is why the same thing didn’t happen here. Or, more importantly, why he fantasizes that it did. In his NPR interview with Roth, Robert Siegel addresses the question of why it didn’t happen here by asking Roth if it were “a lucky break or was the American experience essentially different.” Roth answered by saying that it was both, which is another way of saying that he doesn’t know the answer. He’s less ambiguous in his book, where he attributes the lack of pogroms to “guarantees embedded in the US Constitution,” which “combined with long-standing American democratic traditions, made it impossible for a final solution to the Jewish problem to be executed in America as rapidly or efficiently as on a continent where there was a thousand-year history of anti-Semitism deeply rooted in the common people and where Nazi rule was absolute.”

So we’re back to the standard explanation once again. Which is to say, it didn’t happen here because Christianity, the real root of anti-Semitism, wasn’t as strong here as in Europe. Of course, there is all sorts of evidence, especially in Roth’s book, that contradicts this explanation. The whole threat of anti-Semitism in Plot is based on the presence of the Catholic Church in Newark and elsewhere, a presence which causes severely ambivalent feelings in young Philip. At one point he is filled with loathing for the Catholic Church; at another he wants to run away to the Catholic orphanage run by German nuns. Roth’s “nightmarish vision of America’s anti-Semitic fury roaring eastward through the pipeline of [Route] 22” is based on the premise that America’s anti-Semites are all God-fearing Christians, or that all God-fearing Christians are anti-Semites. That, of course, means that it should have happened here, especially if, as many indicate, Christianity is stronger here than in sensual secular Europe.

In his review of Plot in The New York Times, Frank Rich tries to explain Roth’s fears by connecting them to the Bush administration in the wake of 9/11, even though Roth advised against reading the novel as a “roman a clef of current times,” in the same paper. Rich sees in Lindbergh, “a president [who] can use fear . . . to impose a dangerous idee fixe” on America, an obvious reference to George W. Bush. When Rich reads Plot, what strikes him is “the sinking sense that the ‘perpetual fear’ he describes is in some ways a cousin to the fear we live in now. Surely ‘perpetual fear’ defines our post 9/11 world—and the ruthless election-year politics of autumn 2004.” Rich then links the fear to American foreign policy. Even though Bush’s policy of preemptive war” is “FDR incarnate” and “the very antithesis, of Lindbergh’s isolationism,” the final results of that venture are not in yet:

In truth we’ve only just begun to be tested. We are still in the very early stages of two wars whose ends are nowhere in sight. The war in Iraq has already been pinned on Jewish Neoconservatives by Senator Fritz Hollings of South Carolina, a Kerry-supporting Democrat, as well as by right-wingers like the unrepentant Pat Buchanan, as if the non-Jewish president and vice president were not among its architects.

So if the war in Iraq goes bad (or worse) then, the Jewish Neoconservatives will be held accountable, and the pogroms will break out in Kentucky? Once again, politics becomes a pretext for paranoid fantasy. What links Rich and Roth is a common frame of mind, not an objective reading of American foreign policy.

There is much in Roth’s book, on the other hand, that doesn’t fit in with Rich’s analysis. Roth himself disputes the claim that it’s about 9/11, claiming that he began it in January of 2001. Roth also claimed in an interview with John Freeman in the Times-Picayune that he “was very much trying to deal with these figures who were out of my childhood, some of whom were quite frightening to me as a child, like Father Coughlin.” Roth, Freeman continues, “remembers Coughlin’s Sunday night radio addresses—which often included attacks on prominent Jewish figures—as vividly as he remembers hearing Hitler’s voice on the radio.”

But why should Roth, who sits atop the literary world, fear a Catholic priest who has been universally demonized for over 60 years now? Ultimately Roth’s fears have no objective basis—something that should not be surprising in a novel that is based on an event that didn’t happen. The basis of his fears is his hatred of Christianity. From a theological point of view, this shouldn’t be surprising, because “perfect love drives out fear.” If love drives out fear and if “hate is a Jewish virtue,” as we read in First Things (cf. my piece “Mock Messiah: Jewish Humor and Cultural Subversion,” Culture Wars, January 2004), then it is not surprising that Jews should be consumed by fear. In Greek, hate and fear are, after all, the same word, phobos. You fear what you hate; you hate what you fear. Christ is the only one who has shown us the way out of that vicious circle. But, according to Roth, Christ is precisely the problem. In giving one more expression of his fear in Plot, Roth fantasizes Irish Catholics showing up in Newark, “seeking vengeance against the Christ-killers of the Jewish Third Ward.” All of the post-Vatican II assurances from liberal clerics have left Roth unconvinced. He still thinks that Jews are Christ-killers. At certain moments he exults in the fact; at other moments it leaves him obviously uneasy.

Christ is the issue

After following an suspecting goy home—a game that young Philip plays with his young friend Earl—they peer into the goy’s front window and see a Christmas tree in his living room, and then Earl whispered, “See the top? At the very top of the tree—see that? it’s Jesus.” The vision Jesus becomes an epiphany of sorts for little Philip:

This then was the culmination of our quest—Jesus Christ, who by their reasoning was everything and who by my reasoning had f***ed everything up because if it weren’t for Christ there wouldn’t be Christians, and if it weren’t for Christians there wouldn’t be anti-Semitism, and if it weren’t for anti-Semitism there wouldn’t be Hitler, and if it weren’t for Hitler, Lindbergh would never be president, and if Lindbergh weren’t president. . . . [his ellipsis].

When the goy invites the two boys in for a cup of hot chocolate, Earl shouts, “Beat it, Phil—it’s a fairy!” and both boys run away.

Young Philip is both attracted and repulsed by Christ, who is both weak and strong at the same time, in a way that Roth cannot understand. On the one hand, he wants to run away to either the German Catholic orphanage in Newark or Father Flanagan’s Boys Town. On the other hand, he fears “the orphans, the priests, the nuns and the parochial school whip,” although it seems unlikely that Catholic whips would be used on Jewish boys. Like other Jewish children, little Philip “would generally cross the street on the rare occasions we saw them swishing our way in their witchy attire.” Like the sexually deviant Roth of Portnoy’s Complaint, the young Philip “couldn’t manage to be anywhere near a nun, let alone a pair of them, without a mind awash in my none-too-pure Jewish thoughts,” even though the nuns have treated him with kindness: “the taller of the nuns smiled down” at Philip when she meets him on the bus, “and with a vague sadness in her quiet voice—perhaps because the Messiah had come and gone without my knowing it—commented to her companion, ‘What a well-scrubbed cute little boy.’”

Is Roth afraid that this nun is going to lead a pogrom through Newark? Well, yes, in a way he is, but the idea is connected to his “none-too-pure Jewish thoughts,” something that he develops later on when he discusses the lynching of Leo Frank in Georgia, Frank was accused of molesting 13-year-old Mary Phagan, an employee in his factory. According to Roth, “Hanging ‘the sodomite’” Frank from a tree in Marietta, Georgia, Mary Phagan’s hometown, was “a public warning to other ‘Jewish libertines’ to stay the hell out of the South and away from their women.” Since Roth described the behavior and thinking of the “Jewish libertines” so well in Portnoy’s Complaint, a jury would have no trouble convicting them even if they weren’t lynched.

Fear, in other words, may be created by hatred, but it is compounded by guilt. According to Roth’s own account, the Jews have behaved abominably in America, after America welcomed them from the pogroms of Russia. Roth at one point tells us that as a child, he had already “begun to think of myself as a little criminal because I was a Jew.” Roth makes statements like this to elicit sympathy, but even in doing this he points us again to guilt. Judging from his memoir-like novels there is enough personal guilt to warrant any number of powerful feelings, but since this is an essentially ethnic book, we’re talking about ethnic guilt as well. To begin with, Roth feels guilt about the Jewish invasion of America. America, as Rabbi Lapin never tires of saying, treated the Jews well, and Jews like Philip Roth repaid America by promoting cultural subversion. Portnoy is a Jew whose main happiness consists in debunking the beliefs of the goyim while at the same time defiling their women, something he did while on a congressional committee in Washington: “Yes,” he tells his analyst,

I was one happy yiddel down there in Washington, a little Stern gang of my own, busily exploding Charlie’s honor and integrity, while simultaneously becoming lover to that aristocratic Yankee beauty whose forbears arrived on these shores in the seventeenth century. Phenomenon known as “hating your Goy and Eating One Too.”

When Philip’s father drives from Newark to Kentucky and back again to rescue Sheldon Wishnow, Roth takes the opportunity to turn the trip into a symbol of Jewish migration to America. “An analogy could be made,” Roth tells us, describing the drive to Kentucky,

to the uninvited white settlers who first poured through the Appalachian barrier into the favorite hunting grounds of the Delaware and Algonquin tribes, except that instead of alien, strange looking whites affronting the local inhabitants with their rapaciousness, these were alien, strange-looking Jews provocative merely by their presence. This time around, though, those violently defending their lands from usurpation and their way of life from destruction weren’t Indians led by the great Tecumseh, but upright American Christians unleashed by the acting president of the United States.

No country on the face of the earth, not even Poland, was as welcoming of the Jews as America. Now the grandchildren of the Jews who escaped the pogroms which followed the assassination of the Czar in 1881 are fantasizing about pogroms once again, and the rest of us are forced to wonder why. Roth has done us all a service in this regard by giving us insight into the troubled psyche that produces these fantasies. It is ultimately Roth’s hatred of the goyim, not any historical precedent, which allows him to fantasize the pogrom as coming from places like Kentucky and Detroit and Newark’s Catholic ethnic neighborhoods:

in Newark, there was a heavily Jewish neighborhood abutting large communities of working-class Irish, Italians, Germans, and Slavs that were already home to a goodly number of bigots. The assumption was that these people wouldn’t require much encouragement to be molded into a mindless destructive mob by the pro-Nazi conspiracy that had successfully plotted the riot in Detroit.

“The assumption?” Whose assumption, we are forced to ask, other than Roth’s? Roth fails to see that if there was anti-Semitism in those communities, it grew out of the excesses of Jewish Bolshevism, the news of which got transported from places like Budapest, Warsaw, and Munich to places like Newark, Hamtramck and South Bend. The ethnic communities communicated regularly with their European counterparts, something that caused Louis Wirth considerable concern. Catholics were resolutely anti-Communist. Jews were just as resolutely pro-Communist. Yet in spite of the animosity there were no pogroms in America. Roth fails to see that “it didn’t happen here” because the communists never came to power in America. If they had, there might have been a bloody reaction here, just as Lindbergh predicted. In the final analysis, Roth’s fear may be a function of his cultural power. If the Jews of eastern Europe were held responsible for the excesses of Bolshevism, is someone going to be held accountable for acts of cultural terrorism like Portnoy’s Complaint and The Plot against America? Are the Neoconservatives going to be held accountable for the debacle in Iraq?

Roth’s novel falls apart at the end because of the incoherence of his rage and his ambivalence toward those he hates. What could have been plotted as a thriller switching back and forth between the individuals caught up in events, turns out to be turgid and anti-climactic. Roth, as if frightened by his own fantasies, announces that Roosevelt is back in the White House and that, therefore, everything is okay in a weird sort of flash-forward that ruins the plot, which then spins along in the following manner: Walter Winchell is assassinated “for speaking his mind in the state of Kentucky . . . by the Nazis of America”; Mrs. Wishnow, Philip’s neighbor, who had been shipped to Kentucky to get Americanized, is murdered by a raging Nazi mob and left in “a drainage ditch alongside a potato field in the flat country just south of Louisville.” Lindbergh flies to Louisville to calm the mob, but on the way back home his airplane mysteriously disappears, making Burton Wheeler president “now to inflict on us the laws we knew to have been imposed by the Nazis on the Jewish children in Germany,” even though “Hitler had already settled on [Henry Ford] as Lindbergh’s successor.” Roth’s father and brother have to drive to Kentucky, at much personal peril, given the number of anti-Semites lurking just west of the Hudson River, to rescue Mrs. Wishnow’s son. And, best of all, Rabbi Bengelsdorf, the quisling German Jew who speaks with a Southern accent (to give some indication of the depth of his villainy, I suppose) “is taken into custody by the FBI under suspicion of being among the ringleaders of the Jewish conspiratorial plot against America.”

Terrible Guilt

Again, we’re back in the Jewish version of Through the Looking Glass. If Roth’s point is that Jews who collaborate with revolutionary regimes do so at their own peril, it is a point worth making. But the person most notorious for doing this sort of thing during the 1930s was not Henry Ford, or Charles Lindbergh, or Charles Coughlin, it was Roosevelt’s anti-Semitic hero Josef Stalin, who purged the Jews one by one at the show trials of 1937. It was Stalin who roared with laughter when Marcel Pauker, secretary for the Rumanian Central Committee, gave his imitation of Sinoviev’s Jewish accent crying out “Hear, O Israel, your God is one” just before he was executed by Stalin’s henchmen. If Roth had read Manfred Georg’s essay “The Jewish Revolutionary,” which appeared in the Weltbuehne in 1930, he would have known that “all revolutions devour their Jews.” The “revolutionary Jew” is carried high up on the revolutionary wheel, remains “for a long time on top,” but when he begins to sink the terror begins.” Von Bieberstein quotes Simon Dubnow, who wrote in his memoirs about “the terrible guilt” that “weighs down on Jews because of their participation in Bolshevism.”

So maybe that explains Roth’s fear. The fear found expression in 2004 when the State Department established an office to track anti-Semitism throughout the world, at the very pinnacle of Jewish cultural influence. Fear is always a by-product of the Revolution. Mary Wollstonecraft noticed it in Paris, when “Citizen Capet” was dragged off to be executed; Christopher Isherwood noticed the same thing in Berlin. The Revolution invariably devours its Jews. Hence, Roth’s fear. Frank Rich noticed it in America in the wake of 9/11. The revolutionary Jews brought the revolutionary wheel in motion. The fact that many of them were crushed under the same wheel should not blind us to the responsibility they bear. That guilt will continue to have unfortunate psychological sequelae, most notably fear and guilt, as expressed in things like the novels of Philip Roth, until repentance and conversion take it away.

Hide 295 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. “… Roth fantasizes Irish Catholics showing up in Newark, “seeking vengeance against the Christ-killers of the Jewish Third Ward.””

    In Woody Allen’s recent autobiography “Apropos of Nothing”, in a chapter where he reminisces about his high school years in Brooklyn, he mentions a pal named “David Panich, who had a different loaded gun within easy reach in every room of his apartment because he suspected an imminent Nazi uprising.”

  2. Arguing with a novel is kind of conceptually dopey.

    And calling Portnoy’s Complaint a call for sexual liberation is like calling the Three Stooges a meditation on violence.

    Portnoy’s Complaint was just a tour-de-force of dirtiness to get Roth noticed.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @Pheasant
    , @PeterMX
    , @vinteuil
    , @ivan
  3. Roth is pronounced rot. Good name for a rotten person.

  4. My general impression of E. Michael Fanatic is that he is against the Jews because they don’t accept Papal rule over his Judeo-Christian religion. As bad as Protestants in his mind.

    I’m waiting to be enlightened, waiting for him to show me the place in the NT where Jesus rules that there is such a thing as Apostolic Succession, meaning the present Roman Pope is an apostle.

  5. Bundespresident Friedrich Ebert


    The Weimar Republic consisted of federal states just like the Kaiserreich was a federation of quasi-independent principalities. The collective was the “Reich”.
    Only for about 1000 years (1933-45, arguably a bit longer ind the later GDR) was Germany a centralized state.

    • Replies: @sally
  6. Pheasant says:

    How many novels have you argued with?

    • LOL: Jim Bob Lassiter
    • Replies: @Mefobils
  7. I had many books written by scholars on the Holocaust published by the university press but none of them explained what this essay covers. I had been fed the lie that so called antisemitism was entirely the product of irrational Christian persecution based on collective guilt of Jews as Christ killers. I now understand that fear is the most likely explanation for this i.e. those scholars quite possibly knew the historical background for antipathy towards Jews as a tribe but were not prepared to risk their position, finances and reputation by telling the truth.

    The tribe have dropped the atomic cultural bomb on the West and followed it up with a comprehensive carpet bombing of any vestiges of Western values. Their control of the media, finance and politics through graft and the mammon god they worship seems now total. Who dares speak up in imitation.of Jesus in his excoriating rebukes towards the tribe? They haven’t changed in millennia because its still the same spirit which drives them and that spirit which hates goodness also hates human beings.

    Jesus is described as refusing the offer of the entire world by the god of the Jews if only he would worship it. The NT says the prince of this world is not god and that effectively this world is a war zone in which the true measure of a person is what they did behind enemy lines – take the offer which the Jews have accepted i.e. the ephemeral baubles of this world or stand up for truth against lies.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Emslander
    , @T. Weed
  8. Jake says:

    What Jones grasps, and which serves to undergird everything he writes, is that this kulturkampf is a spiritual/religious war. Either you are on the side of Christ and Christendom, or you are a revolutionary against Christ and Christendom.

    What Jones knows – and should be obvious from the above – is that the Reformation was a revolution against Christendom, and that Jews played an indispensable role in spreading Reformation ideas and violence.

    Another thing that Jones knows that is not noted in this article is that English-speaking Protestant culture, WASP culture, is uniquely philo-Semitic and has been so among its Elites since at least the rule of archetypal WASP Oliver Cromwell, who made Jewish bankers central to the spread of WASP empire and WASP culture.

  9. Jake says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    And Satan is waiting to be shown that he must serve.

    Those who embrace non serviam always serve with Satan.

    I suggest that you prove that the Reformation and particularly the WASP product have not served the cause of violent revolution time and again as well as general cultural pollution and perversion, all of it bound up with loosening Jews to run amuck in orgiastic acquisition and revolution.

    The reality is that just as there are many Jews (of which group you may be a member) who knowingly would choose Satan over serving Christ and Christendom, there are many Protestants (and Moslems) who likewise knowingly would choose Satan over serving Christ and Christendom.

    A akin purpose of such people is to keep leading people into Satanic non serviam. Hence your post.

    • LOL: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Troll: Druid
    • Replies: @Druid
    , @anonymous
    , @anonymous
  10. wesmouch says:

    I read the book The Plot Against America years ago and was struck by the palpable disdain Mr Roth (per his characters) had for the goyim. It is very perplexing to me that the Toxic Tribe lives in the belly of the beast (Christianity) and tries to bring it down. Perhaps they are foolish enough to believe that there will be no untoward outcome of their contempt for the goyim they are surrounded by. But then again they may wish to provoke hatred of themselves. Go to youtube and watch Barbara Lerner Spectre talk about the Jews introducing multiculturalism. She notes with relish that the Jews will be hated for doing it. Kind of sick. The Toxic Tribe appears to have a disproportionate number of the World’s sociopaths.

  11. This is the good Jones; the bad Jones is the fellow who tells us that race doesn’t exist, and that a Caucasian American woman marrying an African pygmy is fine as long as said pygmy is Catholic.

    • Disagree: Fuerchtegott
    • LOL: northeast
  12. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” – Matthew 16:17-18

  13. The premise of the novel is that Charles Lindbergh was elected president in 1940. Everything else in the book follows from that premise and from Roth’s ethnic paranoia and his ethnic bigotry. The most significant thing about Roth’s book is the fact that it’s fiction.

    Gilad Atzmon sometimes jokingly mentions his idea that many Jews suffer from PTSD, meaning Pre-Traumatic Stress Disorder, because they’re always freaking out over things that haven’t happened yet. But Plot is an example of something even weirder: a Jew (Roth) freaking out over something that never happened at all. What should we call this? HTSD – Hypothetical Traumatic Stress Disorder?

    If Lindbergh was talking about Europe, however, he was profoundly right in a way that no one could have understood at the time. War provided the cover for the annihilation of large numbers of Jews in Europe.

    Or so they claim.

    Like many Jews, Roth subscribes to the dogma that anti-Semitism is a pathology whose source is Christianity and which is, therefore, inseparable from Christianity. As a result, anti-Semitism has no relationship to Jewish behavior.

    What few Jews will ever admit is that the opposite is closer to the truth: Jewish anti-Christianism came first and was a product of the Babylonian Talmud of the Dark Ages, many centuries before any pogroms started up in Russia.

    National Socialism was a reaction to communism. To ignore this fact or to write as Daniel Jonah Goldhagen does that “anti-Semitism has nothing to do with Jewish behavior” is to render an entire era incomprehensible.

    Indeed, several eras!

    Hitler was stymied at the beginning of his political career by both Jewish assimilation and German acceptance of that fact …

    Moreover, there’s no evidence that even Hitler himself had any animosity towards the Jews before the First World War. According to his biographers, his attitude towards them really only darkened noticeably after the Russian Revolution.

    According to Roth’s own account, the Jews have behaved abominably in America, after America welcomed them from the pogroms of Russia.

    And that’s what really hurts: the knowledge that we let these people into our country genuinely (if naïvely) believing that all that misfortune which historically transpired in Europe could safely be left behind, now that we a constitution guaranteeing religious freedom. We assumed that now that they could live peaceable among us, all hostility towards us would subside, enabling us truly to become fellow countrymen.

    And then to realize that our good will was so crassly taken advantage of; our hopes for a new start so cruelly exploited and betrayed! It’s enough to make just about anyone a ‘hater,’ I suppose …

  14. Dumbo says:

    I don’t know if it’s because of their guilty conscience or other reason, but Jews are extremely paranoid.

    I mean no other ethnic-religious group had it (and still has it) so good in America, and yet they keep inventing paranoid fantasies and complaining of “anti-semitism”, as if they were in a concentration camp. It’s just insane.

    The other option is that Jews are somewhat masochists and they actually like to be hated, if people like them too much they become restless and uncomfortable.

  15. wesmouch says:

    I have come to believe the latter is correct. There is a peculiar tendency to wish to be hated

    • Replies: @FactChecker
  16. “The only purpose of this so-called Just Folks,” Roth tells us, “is to make Jewish children into a fifth column and turn them against their parents.”

    So Roth fears Jewish children being indoctrinated by gentiles to turn against their community?

    In the real world, Jewish youth everywhere in the Western Hemisphere are given ample opportunity to attend Jewish primary schools, attend Jewish summer camps, belong to Jewish community centers, join Jewish activist organizations in post-secondary, go on ‘birthright’ trips to Israel, take Israeli citizenship and serve in its military, become members of ethnic professional development initiatives aimed at giving them a leg up, and then take their place in the private and political strata, networking with their co-ethnics for wealth and power. Jewish offspring are managed from cradle to grave to take the torch from their parents.

    If Europeans attempted such solidarity the ADL and B’nai B’rith would be screaming for the government to put a boot on their necks, just as they do now.

    Instead, European children are indoctrinated in division and criticism of their own culture, much helped by Jewish efforts of the past half century.

    Yes, Roth is projecting his guilt.

  17. @wesmouch

    That’s because they are sociopaths. Judaism is just sociopathy enrobed in religious garb.

    The truth about anti-Semitism is that Jews need it. They need to be hated and thus in their sociopathic minds justify their own hatred in revenge.

    One point that Mr. Jones could have mentioned was the very high rate of intermarriage between Jews and Germans in 1920s Germany. I’ve heard this mentioned a propos of a wistful “what if” scenario. Oh, if only Hitler had not entered the world stage in the 1930s, then the “Jewish quesiton” would have solved itself as Jews themselves were dissolved into the German general population.

    Left out of this supposition is that it was precisely this apparent assimilation that precipitated the Bolshevik virus. Karl Marx was not just born of a long line of rabbis, but he and his father were official converts to Lutheranism. Karl himself married into the Prussian aristocracy, even though he worked tirelessly to destroy the foundations of the society that naively admitted him and his ilk.

    Lesson for today: You can’t pet a rattlesnake.

    • Replies: @G J T
    , @ThreeCranes
  18. Lot says:

    I like this article’s discussion of the book, which I didn’t read. Jones shows the unpleasant side of Roth that other writers have warned about and kept me from reading any of his books.

    The HBO show is discussed less here. My thoughts:

    I enjoyed it. Not because I agree with its “message,” but because it is simply a really good historical action-drama set in 1940-41 America, which isn’t something that’s ever got a top quality depiction before. There’s a lot set in WWII or the Depression, but the USA from 40-41 is an odd but interesting transitional period.

    I don’t think the movie can be described as Jewish propaganda at all. Most of the adult Jewish characters are portrayed negatively: cowards, hotheads, closed-minded, nerdy dweebs, pretty criminals, political grifters. And Mrs Lindburgh gets a well rounded and positive treatment.

    Overall, it is a very good show with some top tier actors and sets. Forcing it into a JQ obsession framework both doesn’t work and ruins its strong entertainment value.

    • Replies: @Pericles
    , @Mia Culpa
  19. anarchyst says:

    Just a theory of mine…

    Jewish paranoia can be traced to the evil, demonic practice of “male genital mutilation”, known as “circumcision”.

    This barbaric practice is imposed on jewish males on the eight day after birth without the use of any anesthetic. As the infant’s brain is still developing, the additional pain and trauma imposed “rewires” the brain in a negative way.

    Not only is the infant’s penis mutilated, the jewish “mohel” then proceeds to fellate the infant. This is a good way to introduce venereal diseases and STDs from the “mohel” to the infant.

    It would be interesting to screen all jewish males for venereal diseases and STDs on a long-term basis. I’ll bet that over 75% of jewish males are harboring venereal diseases or STDs.

    Just maybe this is why jewish males are so f#cked up.

  20. Saggy says: • Website

    War provided the cover for the annihilation of large numbers of Jews in Europe.

    There is something fundamentally wrong with the mind of E.M. Jones who repeats the preposterous lies of the holohoax but will not bother to justify them.

    I’m coming to believe that all ‘Christians’ are the Jews’ whores.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @FactChecker
  21. It’s a myth that Hitler rose to power solely by scapegoating Jews. We are given the impression that vitriolic Jew-hatred was every party rally’s theme, that the rafters shook with the roars of approval of bloodthirsty murderers incited to animalistic fury.

    We are expected not to know or care that most Germans had never even seen a Jew, since Jews made up barely one-half of one percent of Germany’s population.

    In fact people supported the party for its pledges to rebuild the economy, to get them decent jobs and affordable housing, food, clothing, and medical care, to get back the land and the millions of their countrymen that were stripped from Germany after the Great War, to rebuild the army into a force strong enough to repel the rapacious British and French empires when their next attack came. And these goals were nearly all achieved in Hitler’s first Four Year Plan. An unbiased account is online at

    The failure of liberal democracy and the deadly dangers of international capitalism and Soviet communism were also popular subjects to which politically sophisticated German audiences responded enthusiastically. And most astonishing to me in my researches was the discovery of German political theorists’ accurate warning of the coming role of the United States as the greatest threat to peace and international cooperation, eclipsing even Stalin’s Soviet Union in its ruthless ambition to rule the world.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  22. Pericles says:

    Overall, it is a very good show with some top tier actors and sets. Forcing it into a JQ obsession framework both doesn’t work and ruins its strong entertainment value.

    Is this what they call ‘chutzpah’?

    • Replies: @Felix Culpa
  23. Pericles says:

    Aren’t basically all Americans circumcised? Disgusting habit, by the way.

    Well, at least you don’t have the problem that distinguishing friend from enemy can be as easy as ordering them to drop their pants.

  24. @Pericles

    Yeah,but we’ll do it anyway,just to embarrass them.

  25. Dumbo says:

    Jews are tiresome.

    I’ve read quite a few of Roth’s novels by the way. Not this one which always seemed to me a bit gimmicky. Some are good but it’s Jew Jewety Jewy Jew all the time. “American Pastoral” is one of the few that isn’t and focuses on more general themes.

    But, all in all, I wouldn’t put him in my list of great writers. He’s too 20th-Century-American-Jewish to be too interesting for long.

    A more interesting novel is the one by the other Roth, Joseph Roth, “The Spider’s Web”, which implies that there were certain Jews manipulating even the rise of nationalistic violence and future war in Germany in the early 20s. Because they hate the goys and want them to fight among themselves. Really. There is a Jewish character in this novel by a Jewish writer from 1923 who says just that.

    • Thanks: Saggy
  26. @Beavertales

    “The only purpose of this so-called Just Folks,” Roth tells us, “is to make Jewish children into a fifth column and turn them against their parents.”

    Very similar to what the Jew-Bolsheviks in the Soviet Union did to the kids there–making them turn on (and turn in) their own parents:

    More Jewish projection!

  27. anarchyst says:

    Yes, “male genital mutilation” is commonplace in the USA due to promotion by the “health community” as a hygiene issue, which is totally dishonest.
    If I had my way, “male genital mutilation” would be banned. If jews or muslims want it done they can travel to israel or some other sh!thole and have it done.
    At least, here in the USA there is no “mohel” to fellate the infant and pass on jewish STDs or venereal diseases.

  28. Swanny says:

    Jews are bad. I’ve experienced it my self.

  29. By the way, if anyone here is interested in a more fulsome treatment of Charles Lindberg, Counter-Currents recently ran a fantastic four-part series on him. The first three installments deal with Lindberg himself and with the real history of the America First Committee, while the fourth installment critically evaluates the new HBO series:

    • Thanks: Saggy
    • Replies: @Fluesterwitz
    , @anonymous
  30. @Dumbo

    I don’t know if it’s because of their guilty conscience or other reason, but Jews are extremely paranoid.

    I mean no other ethnic-religious group had it (and still has it) so good in America, and yet they keep inventing paranoid fantasies and complaining of “anti-semitism”, as if they were in a concentration camp. It’s just insane.

    The other option is that Jews are somewhat masochists and they actually like to be hated, if people like them too much they become restless and uncomfortable.

    Ashkenazi Jews are prone to schizophrenia and similar afflictions.

    However, some Mizrahis are just as unstable mentally. My favorite specimen is Rachel Shabi the Israeli-born journalist based in Blighty who is ever unhinged.

    I suppose group narcissism is another factor.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  31. RVBlake says:

    So, Catholic neighborhoods were targeted by the Office of War Information in its Negroes to the North campaign? To weaken Catholic solidarity and break up the influence of Catholic votes? Not Whites, but Catholics? Hmmm

  32. @Digital Samizdat

    One can blow that passage apart by simply reading John chapter 1. Simon bar Jonah happened to be the first of the group to speak up and only said what his brother had told him to say, who in turn learned it from John the Baptist. And common sense makes it obvious that it is Simon’s answer, the fact that Jesus is the Christ, the son of the living God, not Simon himself, is the foundation of the Church, the rock on which it’s built.

    But you’ve entirely missed the point. Taking that Matthew passage at face value, you’ve still missed the point. Those words of Christ are addressed to one person, a mortal man, 2000 years ago. How could Peter being the rock be inherited by someone else? How could the fact that Peter is an Apostle be inherited by someone else, and passed on by Apostolic Succession over milennia? How can such a thing as Apostolic Succession exist except by there being a passage in the NT saying that a successor to Peter’s role could exist, and that successor would himself be an Apostle?

    It is a peculiar claim. There would have to be a Bible passage on the specific point. You are unaware of one but it is absolutely key. That you are unaware of such a passage and point at one irrelevant to the issue speaks for itself.

    I think by only coming up with that passage in Matthew, which doesn’t create succession, you have admitted that the claim of the Roman Popes to be the Apostle or an Apostle is bogus.

    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
    , @Anon
    , @Alden
  33. Tiny but important typo:

    “Jewish Bolshevism has demonstrated to the entire world that the Jewish race is nor suffering from degeneracy.”

    Is “nor” supposed to be “now” or “not”?

    Thanks for a top-notch contribution to the education of Catholics and truth-loving people everywhere, E M Jones.

    Vade ad Deum.


    to RVBlake @ #33: “So, Catholic neighborhoods were targeted by the Office of War Information in its Negroes to the North campaign? To weaken Catholic solidarity and break up the influence of Catholic votes? Not Whites, but Catholics? Hmmm”

    “White” did not become a category until quite recently.
    Maybe you’re very young.
    Neighborhoods were ETHNIC — Italian, Polish, Hungarian, etc., not “white”; and those ethnicities had their ethnic Catholic parishes as their center.
    Interstate and beltway highway systems went a long way to shattering parish-centric cohesiveness.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  34. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    So Jesus only intended for the church to last as long as Peter was alive? If not, then how else could it have survived if not through some form of disciplic succession? (Remember: the Bible didn’t exist yet and it wouldn’t exist in a canonical form for a couple centuries to come.)

    In demanding a more precise wording from the Bible on this subject than what’s there, realize that you’re asking a lot. There are other important points of Christian belief, such as the doctrine of
    soteriology or the nature of the relationship between the distinct ‘persons’ of the Holy Trinity, that also have to be teased out of some rather cryptic passages of the Bible.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  35. Since September 11, 1941 Charles Lindbergh’s face has been put on a hundred million rolls of pejorative toilet paper. Every year, somewhere a fresh grease spot gets gets smeared on his name reminding all — especially those in our military culture — of Lindbergh’s supposed antisemitic transgressions*.

    They could not erase his legend, but Lindbergh has been defrocked for decades. So why would America’s real fifth column (Zion) bother go all out now and produce this HBO miniseries trashing Lindbergh? The reason is to target America First. They want to make the expression and modern America First movement as radioactive as possible. If it were to couple with the 9/11 Truth movement they suspect too many skeletons will fall out of the closet and a divorce is sure to follow.

    p.s. The disappearance of Lindbergh’s plane at the end of the story has two likely explanations. One is that he was struck down by God himself. The other is that, as per the Book of Ester where the name of god is not to be found, Lindbergh was taken out by covert action. Read Mossad done it. And it would not be the first time.

    *Please do learn more about this great man. Here is one rather good treatment.

    • Thanks: chris
    • Replies: @War and Propaganda
  36. @Digital Samizdat

    So, tell us how Apostolic Succession is teased out of some rather cryptic passages of the Bible, and how such inferences if they exist can justify the Western half of the Great Schism calling itself the Only Church. That requires more than some teasing out, some search for mere plausibility of the popes calling themselves Apostolic when that and not the rock stuff has been made so fundamental to the unique but itself fundamental claim to papal rule.

    Prior to the conflict with the Gnostics there were no monarchic bishops. The first bishoprics were in Asia Minor to steady the Church, meaning the Christians, in that conflict. At the time the Church of Rome was run by a synod of presbyters but Asia Minor had bishops. The word bishop is used in 1 Timothy but the meaning is it seems a little different.

    So it’s unlikely that there was a Bishop of Rome during Peter’s lifetime.

    But anyway, tell us the specifics of how apostolic succession is established by which cryptic Bible passages.

  37. @Pericles

    Yes, chutzpah.

    If, for Jews, Jewish behaviour has nothing to do with anti-Semitism, then it follows that a HBO Jewish fear fantasy special has nothing to do with Jewish fear but only the “obsession” of the one who notices the fear.

    Lot’s comment reminded me of a student of my father’s who in the 70s attempted to defend Playboy magazine ( and his guilty conscience) on the ground that it had some top -notch articles in it. My dad responded that he didn’t see the too-notch articles getting pinned up.

    The porn got pinned up as does the Jewish fear-porn in the governmental form of “Anti-Semitism” czars and their put-you-on-notice prohibitions.

  38. Mia Culpa says:

    Did you watch the movie with the volume turned all the way down?

  39. anonymous[361] • Disclaimer says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    (with thanks)

    The aviator . . . recalled the only time that he had met Roosevelt, the previous April; he had found that “there was something about him he did not trust. . . like talking to a person wearing a mask.

  40. Richard B says:
    @Logical Meme

    Jewish Supremacy Inc. (JSI) wants one thing and one thing only – power.

    They hate, with a deadly savagery, anyone who stands in their way.

    Everything else flows from that and is just so much cheap rationalization and knee-jerk projection.

    But, because psychotic arrogance and self-awareness don’t go together they have no idea how damaging their self-absorption is.

    Right now JSI and destiny itself are like two trash trucks hitting each other at 100 mph. Shit all over the place. I mean, just look around.

    The rest of us either getting run over or serving as witnesses.

    Maybe one day one of those witnesses will write a book about it all and do so using the one thing Phillip Roth and JSI have no interest in – a committment to reality.

  41. @Amerimutt Golems

    It’s essential that they believe non-Jews hate them and will hurt them sometime. Their little children must be indoctrinated with that notion. Jews must stick together and hate non-Jews because that holds Judaism together. Without that paranoia Judaism would evaporate, there’d be no Jews.

  42. This extraordinarily long account does not do much to explain Mao’s revolution. How many Jews are there in China?

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Franklin Ryckaert
  43. Dr. Jones:

    Your relentless intellectual tenacity exposing and opposing Jew evil / ZOG tyranny is cherished, Divinely Inspired, and entertaining.

    You shine the spotlight on seemingly more Jew-lies than all other commentators combined, keeping (((them))) constantly in the hot sunlight of disinfecting truth like it’s constantly July as (((they))) constantly Jew-lie.

    There is one key literary Jew-lie which seems to have deceived you as it has the other two most widely known scholars on Jew subversion, Dr. Kevin MacDonald and Dr. David Duke, who, as race realists, have perspectives different from yours.

    Two years later, on June 19, 1920, under the title of “The Jewish Peril,” the Christian Science Monitor referred to an alleged world-wide Jewish conspiracy as demonstrated by the newly discovered, and subsequently discredited, Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

    As has been noted in these three separate comments

    “L. Fry” in her invaluable and now hard to find first hand account Waters Flowing Eastward (1933) persuasively in exacting detail refutes the Jew-lie that The Protocols is fiction plagiarized of a prior publication.

    Please find WFE while copies still exist; the only copy I have ever seen was in tatters held together by rubber bands in the deep stacks of the Wayne University library in Detroit, of all places.

  44. Hibernian says:

    In Chicago at least, a white neighborhood is often a predominantly Catholic one.

    • Replies: @Alden
  45. Anon[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    The Bible is the Catholic Church’s book. She alone infallibly determined its canon and she alone has the authority to interpret scripture and define doctrine. Kind of end of story on this.

  46. Anon[201] • Disclaimer says:

    Roth’s hero, Roosevelt, like Roosevelt’s hero Stalin, engaged in active ethnic cleansing at the time the novel takes place.

    Here’s an interesting story of when Bp. Fulton Sheen met FDR:

    [Fulton] Sheen met Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1936 at the White House. He later described the president as bristling with hostility toward Catholics in general and toward Sheen in particular. “There is one thing that I will not tolerate in this country,” Roosevelt said, “and that is giving speeches such as you gave last night in Constitution Hall.” When Sheen asked what had offended him, the president read from a newspaper article. Realizing instantly that Roosevelt was reading from an account of another meeting in Washington, Sheen asked to see the article. The president recognized his mistake, crumpled up the newspaper and threw it into a wastebasket. “You must take my word when I say anything,” he declared.

    Roosevelt then said,“You think you know a great deal about the Church’s attitude toward communism, don’t you? I want to tell you that I am in touch with a great authority, and he tells me that the Church wants the Communists to win in Spain.”

    Sheen replied,“You are referring to Cardinal Mundelein, and I know that Cardinal Mundelein never made the statement that you have attributed to him.”

    Roosevelt then changed the subject and began attacking the archbishop of Baltimore for criticizing the Spanish ambassador to the United States, and also a local priest for allegedly telling parishioners to join a protest against the president “who is in favor of sending arms to the Communists in Spain.” Referring to the priest, FDR shouted,“That man is a liar.” He then realized that he had just condemned the archbishop of Baltimore for using the same term, and laughingly said, “You know how it is, we men in public life become a little excited now and then.”

    Thomas C. Reeves, America’s Bishop: The Life and Times of Fulton J. Sheen (San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2001), p. 91:

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    , @Culpepper
  47. My question is, have the Jews really thought all this through? If they emigrated to America and then later decided that they don’t trust Christians, or want to live near Christians, or be ruled by Christians…. What in earth is supposed to happen next?

    • Replies: @dimples
  48. gay troll says:

    The gospel of Jesus Christ was designed to turn the messianic Jews into Imperial Roman subjects and idolaters, so I can see why Jews would resent Christianity.

    The holy books of Judaism are also false histories written by propagandists for political and material gain, so I can see why anyone would resent Judaism.

    Before this fakakte religious war began, Western civilization thrived under Republican rule. And pagans had no less an understanding of the Almighty than the history hoaxers.

    The U.S. was founded on Deism and neither Christ nor YHWH nor Satan has the slightest bearing on what it means to be an American.

    Fascists and communists go home!

    • Troll: Seraphim
    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @Hibernian
  49. Druid says:

    Jake, you’re a perpetual fu kh ad!

  50. Wally says:
    @Logical Meme

    Speaking of “fantasies”, article author Jones said:

    “War provided the cover for the annihilation of large numbers of Jews in Europe.”

    – No it didn’t. There was no “annihilation of large numbers of Jews in Europe”. Period.
    There is certainly no proof for such a claim as has been shown at and other sites like
    Brainwashed Jones just assumes what he cannot prove.

    – The entire matter here is predicated on the fake & utterly impossible “holocaust” narrative.
    Remove that easily debunked Big Lie from the equation and shysters like Philip Roth have nothing but their own bizarre wishful thinking.

    • Agree: Saggy
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  51. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    German-Americans aren’t afraid of Jews. I am one.

    If some Jew called me a Nazi-one or two have-I’d shrug and laugh.

    Its not like the South, where blacks are ferociously upset over slavery. Donald Trump’s father was from Germany. So what?

    Let’s face it, humans are tribal and we fear races which are physically powerful. People fear blacks because many of them physically powerful.

    Even Donald Trump is an example of powerful German genetics. He’s 6’3 and about 250. His Dad initially used him to scare renters into paying up. He’s old now, but you’d have thought twice about tangling with him when he was 25 years old.

    But German-Americans don’t fear Jews because they’re not. Most of them are physically wimps. We keep reading how supposedly intimidating Harvey Weinstein was, but when wiry tough Irish-American Brad Pitt threatened Weinstein he was scared for days. Fundamentally, this is because Irish are tougher than Jews as a tribe.

    Sorry, but if someone who looked like this guy came to an October fest no German-American on earth would be afraid of him.

    • Agree: Emslander
  52. Druid says:

    You’re pretty f’ed up yourself, anarchyst.

    • Troll: Twodees Partain
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  53. Wally says:
    @Jack McArthur

    “I had many books written by scholars on the Holocaust published by the university press but none of them explained what this essay covers.”

    – Have any of those liars / “scholars” explained how the laughable & impossible ‘gas chambers’ supposedly worked?
    – Have any of those liars explained why the claimed millions upon millions of alleged human remains in fact do not exist even though it’s claimed that such remains do exist in known locations?

    ‘Holocaust’ Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos of Auschwitz / Birkenau:

    Video Link

  54. Seraphim says:
    @Logical Meme

    During Sarah Silverman’s 2005 stand-up performance “Jesus is Magic,” the comedian joked that the Jews killed Jesus and she would “do it again.”: “I hope the Jews did kill Jesus, I’d f****g do it again in a second!” in front of a laughing and plauding audience. But that’s just ‘jewish humor’.

  55. I imagine the tv series is a different matter, but Roth’s book is actually pretty good.

  56. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    ‘It’s essential that they believe non-Jews hate them and will hurt them sometime. Their little children must be indoctrinated with that notion. Jews must stick together and hate non-Jews because that holds Judaism together. Without that paranoia Judaism would evaporate, there’d be no Jews.’

    He puts it a little less strongly, but ironically, Philip Roth has said much the same thing.

  57. Oracle says:

    It’s difficult to feel sympathy for ‘fear’ generated by a largely false narrative which they will not let go of because it allows them to enslave and ultimately destroy us.

  58. @Anon

    It’s not anything of the kind. The canonical books of the New Testament were written in Greek by Jewish disciples of Jesus. The Orthodox and Roman Churches have over time had some differences about the canon. Protestants reject that the OT Book of Tobit is canonical. It doesn’t even appear in the King James Authorised Version, translations from Hebrew and Greek published before 1610. Nor any Revised Standard Version. Likewise several other books such as Judith, Wisdom, Maccabees, several others. Not canonical whatever the Pope of Rome thinks.

    Your talk of the Rome sect claiming infallibility on that topic is a nice demonstration of the absurdity of its hegemonic claims.

    End of story? You idiot! You poor baby in that locked Loyola-esque mental box. Poor brainwashed baby, with no hope of escape.

    • Replies: @Anon
  59. The Jewish faith is a failed faith because of the law of status. The Chosenness of a Jew – that a Jew who breaks the Noachide laws still has a higher soul, whilst a Goy who does the same is only ever unclean, implies that regardless of the law of action that Judaism has, within the faith, a murderer can equate themselves to a sage.

    In this equation – given that good religion implies assossiation with the wise – the sage leaves, because they don’t want to be associated with a murderer, on any level.

    So the faith is left with the deluded – who don’t see the contradiction a law of status implies, and who still concentrate on the law of action (the good practicing Jews), and the opportunists – who do see the contradiction, but who see that they can themselves personally benefit from it.

    The opportunists, use the faith to gain power, at the expense of others.

    The deluded faithful, being unwilling to self reflect, fear the external reaction to their failure – their assossiation with the opportunists. They may even claim that the opportunists are not Jews, because they don’t follow the faith’s laws of action – but they miss the point that for the opportunist, it is the law of status that makes them equal, and that the laws of action are moot to their minds.

    Christ split from Judaism because he abandoned the law of status. Christianity, became a kinder faith, because there was no true hiding from the law of action.

    Judaism is now reforming too, but for now the kinder side has yet to challenge the law of status with intellectual honesty. When it does, a new faith along the lines of Christianity (or Mohism, Taoism, Jainism) should emerge.

    But the nugget of the deluded – who take false comfort in the idolatry of the law of status, will likely remain. And the opportunist tumour will doom them into their future, as the cycle plays out again and again, until they again learn that “it is intention, that is called action”.

    I’m impressed the author could read such agitprop, I can’t stomach that many lies flowing through my mind!

  60. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Well, was any other disciple given the keys to the Kingdom? Traditionally, that’s why he has been considered the ‘Prince of the Apostles’. And it was Peter who established the church in Rome, was it not? I think that would solidify the claim that he was Rome’s first bishop.

  61. @wesmouch

    I’ve neither read Roth’s book nor seen the HBO mini-series. After reading this delightfully negative review of ‘The Plot Against America’ in The American Conservative some 15 years ago, you couldn’t pay me to see Roth’s Judiazied fantasy about era in American history where, in fact, malign Jewish influence–not ‘anti-Semitism’–reached toxic critical mass. It’s been downhill ever since.

  62. anonymous[371] • Disclaimer says:

    Are you a white man or are you a Christian ? Jesus’s message wasn’t directed at Slavs, Micks and Dagos. I’m pretty sure his message was originally directed at his fellow Jews for the benefit of them and no one else.

  63. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    In lieu of the hard copy, a PDF of WFE remains available. See here:

    One great irony about the inflated infamy of The Protocols is that it is “antisemitic” when the whole thrust and preponderance of it is an organized and highly sophisticated attack on non-Jews. So who then has a right to be most offended? Who then has a greater obligation to demonstrate to the world it is not true?? It is like finding a diary/manual about how to run a brutal plantation and the news press runs endless stories about what a terrible affront it is on all slave masters. And the slaves have all come to chorus “Yessum. That be no proper respect ta ar Masser.”

    Similarly with the HBO mini series Plot Against America that horribly inverts the truth about Charles Lindbergh. We give this a pass partly because our Founding Fathers cherished freedom of speech. But what is going on? How could such a series simply be for our moral redemption when it so inverts — and perverts — the facts of history and so violently molests the true character of a great man?

    Think Sin City. Who was the nastiest villain of them all in that film? Remember? The Cardinal! Does anyone have a problem if it were remade with a senior rabbi as the most sadistic and vile person in a veritable ocean of vice, violence and corruption? Like, who cares? After all, it is just a cartoon or watcha ma call it graphic novel made into a film for entertainment…

    And to end his long essay with a call for Jews to repent and convert? E, E, E, are you kidding? Boy is that an old egg! I mean while we are waiting for that to hatch, God speed, how about mainstream America rescue our Congress, reclaim our mass media/air waves, and dismantle the Federal Reserve central bank that is blowing it yet again? And high time we prosecute and imprison some of these Israel First war criminals. Netanyahu, Perle, Feith, Wurmser et al. can repent from their Fifth Column in USA, and accept the Lord Jesus any time they want. That would be truly beautiful. But I would be more assured if they did this behind bars with >20 years sentences to chant, and pray, and contemplate how in fact they can be better people, and so learn to look on other people as human beings deserving respect and love..

  64. Emily says:

    Communism is a jewish construct.
    It was the first plan for jewish domination of the planet in the last hundred or so years..
    They enslaved the Russian people for over 70 years by pure terror and oppression.
    Mass murdering millions of them.
    So when that grand plan collapsed and the Russians regained their freedom and created the first real democracy in their history, they took the chance to economically plunder the country with their paid up ‘patsies’ in the West’s help.
    Plundering the Russian people of trillions in natural assets and profits.
    With their failure of enslavement via communism – we suddenly get the new scheme for domination and the new feudalism.
    The destruction of the value of ‘labour’ and the tyranny of profit by using foreign serfdom.
    That now is coming unstuck as well – with 1% of the population accrueing unspendable wealth at everyone else’s expense.
    Wealth being used to subvert our democracy and control the organs of propaganda – eg MSM
    1984 indeed.
    So Globalisation is a failure too.
    What next is on the horizion ?
    God help us.
    Because the brainwashed, bribed and corrupt won’t.

  65. Jewish paranoid fantasies are responsible for much of the current state of the Western World.

    Leftist Jews will tolerate the violence from predatory ghetto rats and Third World immigrants, because such untermenschen are seen as necessary evils in the fight to destroy a greater evil. (…)
    The importation of immigrants from uncivilized nations is an essential element in the destruction of the West. That many of those immigrants are deeply and innately anti-Jewish is something leftist Jews understand and indulge. (…) Leftist Jews are holding out their hands like a scale. In one palm is the well-being of their community. In the other, the war against the white Christian West. Permanent revolution, perpetual war. That’s the hand that wins; the war comes first. There may be a leftist Jew or two who’ll do a Bill Bullitt about-face as the collateral damage continues to mount in Jewish communities. But by and large, Jews will stay the course (…)

  66. jasmin says:

    More Jewish paranoia. It has long since become just Palin boring. The major influence the Jews had in bring the United Staes into both wars cannot be denied. Now they are trying to bring us into WW III. If Trump falls into this trap being prepared by Sheldon Adelson and Netanyahu the Jews will have the perfect trifecta.

    Charles Linbergh was an authentic American hero. And America first is not some horrifying Jewish paranoid nightmare it is a concept that means just that. And why not? It’s a counter to the Israel first neoconservative agenda.

    • Replies: @marden
  67. dimples says:
    @Bogus Pogus

    “What in earth is supposed to happen next?”

    That’s a bizarre question. Where have you been hiding? The Christians just do whatever the Jews tell them.

  68. Truth3 says:

    God Bless all Truth Tellers… including…

    Philip Giraldi
    Henry Ford
    Father Charles Coughlin
    Charles Lindbergh
    Huey Long

    • Replies: @Wally
  69. @Pericles

    Circumcision percentages:


    • Thanks: anarchyst
  70. Speculation about an impending Jewish inspired revolution in this country may be irrelevant, if obsolete, at this point. How much more Jewish control of our financial, academic, entertainment, and foreign policy institutions should obtain before we realize the revolution has for long been in place and consolidated? What we are now witnessing are the maintenance and expansion phases of that revolution.

  71. Truth3 says:

    Jewish hatred of the rest of Mankind has been the World’s Foremost Problem since before Moses.

    The Jews declared War on Mankind, and have never stopped attacking.

    They attack like any parasite would… drawing out the treasure and eventually killing the host so as not to be ‘found out’.

    It’s time these parasites realize that the inevitable attempt to rid the world of this problem will not be to their pleasure.

    Stop being Jews. This Exodus is needed.

  72. Robjil says:

    Jones is afraid of being of accused of being a big 6 “denier”.

    It is a “big” thing in our Zion Macht Frei (ZMF) world.

    Anyone labeled a big 6 denier is relentless labeled this by our ZMF press endlessly like it is the “biggest” sin “ever”.

    This is the reason he carries the Big 6 torch.

    He is afraid of being a Galileo.

    The big 6 is in the sky now as the center of our ZMF universe.

    The world needs many Galileos to bring back the sun as the center of our universe instead of the big 6.

    • Replies: @PTD
  73. On the Website of the San Francisco Public Library I published the short comment below at Alpha on Roth’s PLOT. SFPL Director Michael Lambert shamelessly invoked anonymous complaints from an entity called “Bibliocommons” to try to justify graying out my text and tagging it as “offensive”.

    What membership entity –library, school, church etc.– will be the first to establish an online venue wherein all registered members willing to sign their own true names to their remarks will be able to speak freely? Such an initiative will in some fashion restore at least the technical possibility for robust debate which we the NAGIM [Normal, Alias “Gentile”, IMmensity] used to enjoy on the once-noble Usenet newsgroups before JLS*–911 (*=Jewish Lightning Strike). The full sentence introducing a key phrase: Jews HATE free SPEECH for us, the honorable NAGIM.


    Feb 20, 2020
    Has the reader perhaps noticed that the Jews have taken over America and by far most of the rest of the world, too? Note, for one example from among many, that in GM’14 (Gaza Massacre) Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu murdered >500 children together with some 1.5K of their kith & kin, helpless prisoners all. The U.S. Congress responded to this atrocity by promising the Jew State an extra \$30 billion (at least) and unique ceremonial honors including 28 Standing O’s.

    Philip Roth = one of the top literary poobahs of the dominant kosher cabal, which emphasizes cultural control as well as assassination, bribery and other techniques of tyranny. In reality Bernard Baruch –the second king of the Jews, as I have long dubbed him– shot to death (via agency) democracy in America in September of 1935 in the person of Senator Huey P. Long, the last great white reformer. Twenty-eight years later, the aged Baruch with David Ben Gurion as his XO pulled off the Dallas Jack Whack, that all-time biggest Jew coup d’etat. Competent analysts such as myself finally became aware of the meaning and authorship of the JFK hit only in the backflash of the comparative crudity of JLS–911 managed by KinkHenKi and his XO the late Aerial Shaboom.

    Shall we envision a nighttime woodland love feast with the following parties sitting in a circle around a campfire, taking turns reading out loud from Roth’s perverse screed? Namely: T-RumPus45; Sulzberger the Heirhead; Mike Bloomberg; former kibbutznik Bernie Sanders; Green Jill “New Jew Deal” Stein and second generation _shabbos shiksa_ Nancy Pelosi.

    Follow-up: A group of shadowy cowards of the AIPAC variety, this time abusing the mask of “the BiblioCommons community”, are semi-censoring my review of Roth’s PLOT. Herewith a link to my response, together with a positive proposal. Since with invidious discrimination the cabal are graying out my text, the interested reader will have to cut and paste the link below:
    alt.california ›
    SFPL Nameless Apparatchiki Choke On “Offense”
    1 post by 1 author
    Mar 4 (9 hours ago) [noted on Thursday 03/05 @ 06:36 hrs PST].

  74. Truth3 says:

    Yeah, right, they are just poor innocent little victims.

    Grow up.

    They love the nasty practice, they do it to their own sons.

    Like the obnoxious asshole Tevya sings in Fiddler… Tradition!

  75. Robjil says:

    85-90 percent of foreigners who helped China become Communist were Jews. Even Jews agree this is so. Ironically, Russians say the same percentage made their nation Communist too.

    Until I saw the documentary “The Revolutionary” at the Philadelphia Independent Film Festival, I mistakenly thought that China during the revolutionary period was one country that had not felt the Jewish embrace. In fact, 85 to 90% of the foreigners helping the Chinese at the time of the Communist takeover were Jewish. This included the daughter of the founder of the brokerage firm Goldman Sachs, who left the comfort of her Park Avenue home to assist the Chinese.

    • Replies: @Hal Womack
  76. @the_old_one

    Does Jones believe that such an absurd marriage would be according to the norms of the Logos?

  77. @restless94110

    Communism was brought to China by “Russian” agents. Most of those “Russians” were Jews. Mao had Jewish advisors.

    • Replies: @ivan
  78. G J T says:

    Yet in spite of the animosity there were no pogroms in America. Roth fails to see that “it didn’t happen here” because the communists never came to power in America. If they had, there might have been a bloody reaction here, just as Lindbergh predicted

    A little late, to be sure, but they still may just get their wish. And we may get ours as well…

  79. G J T says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost

    The truth about anti-Semitism is that Jews need it. They need to be hated and thus in their sociopathic minds justify their own hatred in revenge

    Exactly. Everything the Jew does is ultimately an exercise in self-fulfilling prophecy.

  80. says:

    Again, we’re back in the Jewish version of Through the Looking Glass. If Roth’s point is that Jews who collaborate with revolutionary regimes do so at their own peril, it is a point worth making.

    I agree. Look at Israel’s embrace of, and support for, Donald Trump who also includes white nationalists under his umbrella. What a match made in heaven. Maybe it always was. Trump so loves Israel, he has called Jews “killers,” and he has proclaimed himself King of the Jews. And they eat it up and swoon over him. Donald Trump may well end up being their nadir when it’s all said and done. How long can a moth dance around a flame before the inevitable happens?

  81. To paraphrase GTA’s Michael De Santa: “You miss a thousand shows every day, pal. Make sure this is one of them.”

  82. @anarchyst

    Makes sense.
    Muslims in Europe show the simlilar sick traits compared to normal humans.
    And from a global perspective, mutilated Americans look at least like the most cowardish examples of Caucasians.

  83. @the_old_one

    Why do simpletons like you always have to make up that ridiculous strawman?

  84. Z-man says:

    Man what a long winded article, I only read the first few paragraphs. Me and my cohorts put it briefly and so concise back in March. (Grin)

    Z-man says:
    March 17, 2020 at 4:36 am GMT
    Hollywood is aiding and abetting in this farce. There’s a Nazi hunting series with Al Pacino and another one smearing Lindbergh. I think they’re both on HBO. They should both be flops.
    • Replies: @Seneca44, @John Regan, @Epaminondas, @Johann, @the grand wazoo, @Wally

  85. gotmituns says:

    My wife was hospitalized a few months ago for a week and when I’d go to see here each day, I saw what was on TV and I thanked the Lord for giving me the wisdom to get the dumb thing out of my house years ago. Basically, the TV was what “cured” my wife. The other woman in the room refused to shut her TV off and my wife had no option but to get better in order to get away from the dumb thing.

    • Agree: SOL
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  86. My objection to the Roth schlock is that Roth – and, indirectly, HBO – have exploited a true American hero in order to sell fictional muck and engage in muck-raking for money.
    Lindbergh was a true American Firster – unlike the current occupier of the White House, who is merely a Trump Firster.
    Though he had personal differences with President F. D. Roosevelt, Lindbergh eventually flew some 50 combat missions in the Pacific during the war against Japan.
    To see a cheap novelist like Roth and a mercenary outfit like HBO trashing Lindbergh’s name is an absolute disgrace. They should both be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.

    • Agree: flyingtiger
  87. @Jake

    Another thing that Mr. Jones fails to address when mentioning Henry Ford is Ford’s seminal contribution to the industrialization of the USSR in the nineteen twenties.

  88. Anonymous[118] • Disclaimer says:

    Right. The author’s comment also strikes me as an endorsement of the grotesque exaggerations of the Holocaust, thereby subtly exonerating generalized Jewish identitarian hatred of Christians before launching into polemic against Roth and several others for their demonic antiChristian hatred. In other words, yes, Roth and so many Jews are haters, but the basis of their hatred is explainable since war was merely the Christian “cover” for allowing supposed “Jewish annihilation.”

    I hope the author didn’t intend this since the unspeakable evil in need of remembrance is defiling the memory of the Americans who died by the hundreds of thousands in part to save European Jewry from supposed threats of annihilation that never materialized nor, apparently, were ever planned. As to the reality that doubles the Jewish insult to America and Europe, in Breaking the Spell Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom footnotes (p. 48) a quip from Rense that goes,

    In all of German-occupied Europe, there were 2.4 million Jews. After the war, 3.8 million Jews applied for Holocaust reparations. Tragically, the remaining 6 million were lost.

    And as to who runs America, there’s hardly better proof than Roth’s being awarded the National Humanities Award by Obama for Roth’s sole contribution to literature, which considering he couldn’t string two interesting paragraphs together, came down to paranoid musings on Jewish identitarian hatred of America’s Christian underclass.

  89. Jewish Ode to Michael:

  90. anarchyst says:

    speak for yourself…

  91. Wally says:

    True enough, but lets’ not forget those who have paid a heavy price for their advocacy of free speech on the impossible “holocaust”:

    Official list of Revisionist, “holocaust” Debunking Scholars persecuted / imprisoned for questioning the “Holocaust”:

  92. Anonymous[118] • Disclaimer says:


  93. Anon[299] • Disclaimer says:

    Suspecting an inevitable majority uprising against your group in every nation in which it resides seems like it would cause a rational repatriation to their own single nation. The incentives must be pretty good to continue to do otherwise. Risk and Reward.

    Yet, they will kvetch about realizing a risk penalty no matter what damage they need to do to others to realize the reward.

    Imagine a world in which Israeli and Jewish nationalists were branded plotters against Israel for their nationalism, by a minority group who controlled Israeli film and media.

    Imagine that same minority group ceaselessly worked to dispossess the Jews of their nation.

    If America isn’t a enough of a parallel, this parallel is also found for Europe.

  94. Dumbo says:
    @gay troll

    Wrong, the U.S. was funded by Freemasons. It was likely a NWO project from the start. Novus ordo seclorum is written on the dollar note for a reason.

    • Replies: @gay troll
    , @Seraphim
  95. Hibernian says:

    A proposition of Faith. Not an occasion for triumphalism. Similarly the other side should realize that it, for all practical purposes, holds to a doctrine of Luther’s/Calvin’s/King James’ translators’ infallibility that is a propositon of Faith which others do not share.

    • Replies: @RSDB
  96. Anon[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Look, I can say, as member of Christ’s True Church, we don’t love the Bible any less than Protestant heretics, after all, it is our book. Protestant heretics, for doctrinal reasons, ripped out the Deuterocanonical books from the true canon. Heretical Catholic monk Martin “sin boldly” Luther wanted James ripped out because “faith without works is dead” was too abhorrent to him.

    The Orthodox and Roman Churches have over time had some differences

    Whatever, Ss. Peter and Paul went to Rome, not Constantinople.

    • Replies: @Jake
  97. Hibernian says:

    Eleanor considered him too pro-Catholic. Of course, he had at least one Catholic secretary who was possibly a side girlfriend.

  98. Hibernian says:
    @gay troll

    A few of the Founding Fathers were Deists. Generally they were Christian.

  99. @Jake

    Yes. Jones is in direct intellectual descent from the idea of St Augustine, City of God.

    Jones does know that the founding fathers of America were judaised protestants

  100. Mefobils says:

    To answer for Ngorogoro Guzugu Bubba Obwandiyag (where did he get such a stupid name) why not just call himself Zulu Dog or Ghetto Hoe ? Anyway I digress, just one, Alice in Wonderland

  101. @anarchyst

    Wrong. The Orthodox Rabbis in New Yawk do just that

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  102. Emslander says:
    @Jack McArthur

    Satan always takes his campaigns too far. He/She has a fundamentally incorrect understanding of human nature, which is why he/she couldn’t foresee that the Crucifixion would necessarily result in the Ressurrection and that martyring Christians wouldn’t result in the eradication of the Faith, but in its unstoppable growth.

    I think we’re in the throes of one of those great Satanic miscalculations right now. I don’t know why it appears that American Jews have chosen once again to take the lead in it, but they have. I’d leave the psychological explanations to Roth for this particularly self-destructive bent, but it appears repeatedly.

    • Agree: Fox
  103. @RVBlake

    Hmm. You could read his book which is suffused with sources, including direct quotes from the guilty parties.

    OR, you could just go on ignorantly belching your racial gas

  104. Emslander says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Peter’s tomb is in the Vatican. History and fact support the Catholic Church.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  105. @Hamlet's Ghost

    ”he worked tirelessly to destroy the foundations of the society that naively admitted him and his ilk.“

    Or, as Jewish Groucho said, “I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.”

  106. anarchyst says:
    @Mick Jagger gathers no mosque

    You are correct. Thanks for the clarification.

  107. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:

    Jones seems guaranteed to write a cogent and incisive analysis on any subject that interests him. Glad to see his work appearing on Unz, would love to see more.

  108. Sean says:

    Tsarist Russia was no friend of the Jews who did not have anything to do with Germany fighting Russia in WW1. Everything flowed from the Tsar’s decision for war, and that was predicated on the bank cheque from France, which had an unofficial alliance with the UK (begining when the 1905 revolution on top of the loss to Japan knocked Russia out the balance of power). Serbian state terrorists deliberately engineered a war to increase their country’s territory and Serbia did double in size. Raymond Poincaré had laid the groundwork for a grand alliance to get France’s lost provinces (where he was born) back, and they were returned to France. Hitler was a phenomenon of Germany losing WW1 because of failure to attack Russia in 1905 when it was helpless and Britain had a tiny army.

    The Jews Hitler hated were American Jews because the American capitalist system had supplied Britain everything it needed to keep fighting, and then formally entered the war, harnessed German American emigrant blood (which private first class Hitler saw first hand in American POWs) and sent it to Europe where they–with a little help from the 1918-19 influenza epidemic–prevented Germany winning WW1. The Flu wasn’t finished yet

    COMPARED to the exhausted and embittered British and French, the United States (and Wilson himself) thus emerged as the key player in early 1919, the one party capable of forging a durable peace. But on April 3, 1919, Wilson fell ill with flu-like symptoms. Recognizing that “the whole of civilization seemed to be in the balance,” his physician downplayed the sickness and ordered bed rest. Ever since, historians have wondered about this episode, both concerning Wilson’s prior health problems and his performance when he returned to the negotiating table a week later. Wilson wasn’t the same man. He tired easily and quickly lost focus and patience. He seemed paranoid, worried about being spied upon by housemaids. He achieved some of his specific goals but was unable or unwilling to articulate a broader vision for a better world.

    Contrary to the 14 points stipulated by Wilson that were instrumental on the Germans capitulating, in the aftermath of WW1 Germany was hit with a huge reparations bill. Hitler already hated the Jews as the central galion of Anglo America’s capitalist system that had defeated Germany, but after the post hostilities blockade that killed 800,000 German children, reparations-induced 1923 hyperinflation and the 1933 depression his complaint that American Jews were turning German’s into “white slaves” and colonising them with American capital struck a cord in Germany. Obviously the Jews were behind that were not Bolsheviks, but rather NYC capitalists. The first thing the Nazi’s did when the came to power was close down the port facilities where emigrants embarked. In the darkest days towards the end of WW2 Hitler was still going on about German-American engineers building the planes that were bombing German cities and factories, and taking about 50% on Germany’s resources to combat.

    Hitler was a German nationalist who like many Germans was enthralled by stories of the Wild West and became even more envious of it after seeing the best German (for emigrants are necessarily the most valuable to their homeland) blood in American uniform during WW2. He wanted to make Germany into the”American Union”, but without the Jewish capitalists . First order of business for Hitler was conquering his ‘Wild East’ and killing off the natives, just like Amerika had done, but to keep the British occupied in the Middle East He sent Rommel of with rather too many air assets, better to have given him some pointers about hygiene on tropical countries (which the British had been taught long ago) because at El Alamein 40% of the Germans had dysentery.

    Although his Indians (he actually referred to the Soviets as “Indians”) were militarily quite formidable Hitler would have succeeded had he followed the plan but as with the campaign in France where he was preoccupied with capturing Belgian territory, he began to treat Barbaross as having Balto Ukrainian objectives; in August 1940 Hitler allowed himself to be diverted from the concentrated drive on Moscow that all his military experts wanted. Nevertheless, America gave the USSR getting on for half a million trucks, and how many 88mm guns would Stalin’s tanks have had to face if the lion’s share of those dual purpose guns were not defending the Reich from Allied bombing? Yes Virginia, it was American Jews that Hitler saw as Germany’s greatest enemy, and he was not wrong.

    • Agree: ThreeCranes
    • Replies: @Fuerchtegott
  109. Never say never because anything is possible … isn’t the whole country in lockdown?

  110. Alden says:

    Every streaming service alternates between blacks gays, trannies Jews Nazis and plenty of porn, mostly male dorsal. Maybe all the Jewish men who make movies are gay. The latest Medici series features a major gay character and his lovers backsides and coy flashes of frontal.

  111. Alden says:

    Catholic and private schools are the only reasons most northern cities aren’t 80 percent black.

  112. gay troll says:

    The U.S. was founded on the writings of Thomas Paine, who was against revealed religion and was not a Freemason. He wrote the Declaration of Independence. It is his faith in God that is truly American; not the Jewish, Christian, or Mystery God, but the God that is self evident and illuminated by Reason.

    Of course other founding fathers were involved in Freemasonry. But Paine is the spirit of 1776, and his God had no need for revelation.

  113. Alden says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    The Passover Seder, the night Jesus was arrested. First drink of my blood and eat of my flesh*, the first catholic communion service. That was the transition from Judaism to Catholicism; from an ethnic religion to a universal ( Catholic in Greek) religion, from a Jewish Passover Seder to the Catholic religious service.

    “Thou art Peter and upon thou the rock I shall build my church” St Peter the first Pope. Then Jesus kisses all his apostles and thus created them bishops of the Catholic Church. They ordained priests, some of whom rose to become bishops, who ordained more priests for the next 2,000 years. Direct line back to that 33 AD Seder.

    Go wallow in the sadistic pornographic genocidal Jewish Protestant Old Testament. American Catholics will continue running 70 percent of American hospitals and medical systems and a huge network of alternative catholic schools which are the only refuge from the Protestant founded public schools where White kids are routinely beaten bullied robbed and harassed by the black Protestant animals.

    Plus, we have the greatest museums, libraries art buildings hospitals music and astronomy observatory in the world.

    What have Protestants got? Public schools preaching sex at 12 abortion gay trannies and hatred of Whites, no hospitals, and you pigs destroyed some of the great art of European civilization during your reformation.

    The reformation was a Jewish plot against Christianity from the start. It was Netherlands and German jews. And you prods fell for it and destroyed art beauty and libraries

    The Protestant World Council of Churches was a Soviet front from the start. The one true Roman Catholic Church refused to join. Liberals communists Protestants and Jews denounced the one true Roman Catholic Church for not joining that communist front group.

    American Protestants, especially in the Bible Belt south couldn’t even protect their children from the horrors of school desegregation and busing . Catholics could and do protect their children from the horrors of the Protestant founded public school system.

    There’s an old French saying applicable to the Catholic Protestant divide. “ Don’t listen to what they say, look at what they do.” Protestants talk and have talked themselves into 18,000 sects. Catholics do; schools hospitals art music architecture civil and structural engineering beauty and the calendar we use every day.

    Protestants just talk about the pornographic sadistic genocidal Jewish part of the Bible.

    I’m not a catholic and don’t believe in God or any religious fairy tales. But I’m a cynic and a realist. I’m an empiricist or realist or something. I look at results and reality. I look at what black criminals do. I did not listen to
    liberals exonerating them for their crimes. I look at what Catholics have done for the last 2,000 years and especially, especially what their private schools are doing to protect White American children from black savages and being told to start having sex at age 12 and attending you might be gay classes.

    Don’t listen to what they say, look at what they do.

  114. @Robjil

    The Jew presence in Russia a century ago was by far heavier than in China. In the Polish Pale, the Russian Empire had the largest concentration of Jews in the world, whereas in China the Han population was overwhelming and the various national minorities were also “NAG” or Normal, Alias “Gentile”. One of the main blows in Mao Zedong’s rise to power in the revolutionary movement in the 1920’s and ’30’s was his shoving aside from leadership the several advisors sent from Moscow.

    For this reason the Chinese “Communist” revolution, like its Vietnamese counterpart under Ho Chi Minh, genuinely served the national interest.

    • Agree: Robjil
  115. L Bean says:

    The new season of Showtime’s “Penny Dreadful” takes place in pre-WWII Los Angeles, which is inexplicably stocked with secret and not-so-secret nazis, at all levels. The main supernatural/evil character is of course in direct control of these secret nazis(who occasionally, again inexplicably, don their flair and hold Bund meetings to ensnare the hapless goy who is just jazzed to learn all about the real origins of teh frankfurter). So, with HBOs show we have Bund Beer Garden shit, and now running right alongside incase you missed it, Showtime also has a nightmarish Bund tableau. It is all so ludicrous. But nazis are great characters, it writes itself. I wouldn’t be surprised if all of these storylines were ACTUALLY computer generated these days. There’s no there there, except the nazi. The nazi is always always there, just around the corner, married to your wife’s friend, in local government, or even YOUR BOSS.

    And I’m only on episode one. Showtime has always been like this though, at least for the past 10+ years. But you can see how they coordinate these messages, across the networks. You know, in case someone has an HBO subscription but not a Showtime one and vice versa.

    A similar thing happened wrt Russiagate, and this was all finely planned several years before the recent feverpitch version of it. FX’s “The Americans” (highest rated US show while it ran) was literally written by the CIA to prep the mind for the inhumanity that is The Russian. The premise is that Russians are so evil they sell their own children into the spy game, and then these children settle in the US to undermine it, while part of their cover is to have children of their own, and normal “American” lives. “See, proof that Russians are inhuman! Giving their own children to their evil cause” -some CIA asshole whose only job after being in the CIA was to write the highest rated Russophobic show in history.

    Some of you may remember the odious Masha Gessen. She was the show’s go-to subtitle translater/speech expert.

    Immediately preceding “The Americans”, FX gave us “The Strain”, a vampire series. And you guessed it – the head vampire is a NAZI. So we get these flashbacks to concentration camp scenes, where the evil camp guard is not only a NAZI, but he also literally eats Jews alive.

    But The Plot Against America is something I never thought I’d see committed to film. They’ve used up all of their other horror memes and we are back at square one of pure Ziotard-fantasy. But mostly it’s just more spitting on the goy, in case anyone from the younger generations gets the idea that true antiwar types like Lindbergh might have had a point, after all. The generation who knows he did, they are gone. I’ve seen more comments than I can count in praise of this show, from the younger generation. They love this fantasy shit. The more implausible and dire, the better.

    • Thanks: schnellandine
    • Replies: @S
  116. Without a doubt , one of the most hateful, self glorifying, piece of trash imaginable, with a combination of known facts, and imagined ” what it could have been” , to confuse the typical ignorant human , to a point that he or she has no knowledge of what really happened.
    Incredible that this is not treated as a fantasy, instead it’s presented as a factual historical story.

    To say of what is that it is not, or of what is not that it is, is false, while to say of what is that it is, and of what is not that it is not, is true.
    – Aristotle

  117. gay troll says:

    For an atheist you sure are a diehard defender of Papistry. I guess you like the racism, sexism, and homophobia but actual divinity escapes you?

    Protestants destroyed the great art of European civilization? Have you forgotten that Jews and their bastard offspring the Christians base their religious culture on iconoclasm and intolerance? Christian art sprung out of the ruin of the dark ages, like saplings after a forest fire. It is the fake news of Jesus Christ that burns art and history to the ground in its quest for authenticity.

    You say you don’t believe in any religious fairy tales but you discuss the Gospel as if it were a historical record? How ignorant or devious are you?

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Alden
    , @Anon
  118. @Digital Samizdat

    Good points all, and a couple more.
    Hitler intervened to help his old commander, a Jew, Ernst Hess. He put his mother’s doctor’ Eduard Bloch, to whom he referred as a noble Jew, under the protection of the Gestapo, and reportedly said that if all Jews were like Bloch, there would be no Jewish question.

    The official Krystallnacht narrative was debunked almost 40 years ago by Ingrid Weckert in her book Feuerzeichen later translated into English as Flashpoint. Jewish author Mark Rigg wrote Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers documenting about 150,000 soldiers, including officers up to the rank of Field Marshall, as being of Jewish descent.

    There was an enormous amount of debate within the party over who was a Jew. It seemed to boil down to: were you a German who happened to be a Jew by religion, or a Jew who happened to be living in Germany?

    • Replies: @Wally
  119. @Observator

    Thanks for the link. I don’t know (yet) if it is covered in Tedor’s piece, but the promise to rebuild the military was accelerated when Germany, which had met its disarmament obligations under Versailles complained at the League of Nations, that the other signatories to Versailles had not even begun to disarm. There were a number of German proposals to reduce further. The UK and France basically told Germany to piss off. That is what triggered the rebuilding in earnest.

    • Replies: @Steve Naidamast
  120. Roth gives the impression that anyone who linked Jews and Communism was a raving Nazi anti-Semite,

    I never get the impression from reading to Hitler’s writings and listening to his speeches that the Nazis were “raving” anti-Semites. Rather, they were just normal anti-Semites, quite level-headed. Mein Kampf is fairly tepid on Jewry and it reads as though Hitler has got bigger fish to fry and other preoccupations.

    • Replies: @Grahamsno(G64)
  121. Ray P says:
    @Logical Meme

    “David Panich”. Seriously?

  122. Alden says:

    I never heard of it but it makes sense in these ways.

    Most of the big northern cities had lots of Catholics from 1800 and 48er Germans through endless Irish from 1630 on, especially the 1840 50s famine Irish through 1880 Italians and E Europeans.

    Catholics established their separate grade school system. And coalesced around the parish schools and numerous catholic social political clubs Knights of Columbus , children and teen activities church dances women’s clubs labor unions professional associations employment networks etc etc.

    WW 2 came along and negroes were brought north and west to replace the White men sent off to the military. Blacks are one of the major Protestant ethnic groups. In the west They were sent to Oakland, San Francisco Richmond Ca Los Angeles Long Beach San Pedro and even San Jose Seattle Portland Or where they commenced their work of destroying the cities. San Francisco was the only Catholic city in the west.

    But the Midwest and east coast northern cities were very Catholic.

    If, and only if ; it was a Catholic vs Protestant fight then sending criminal rapacious black Protestants to White Catholic neighborhoods did destroy those neighborhoods.

    But the WW2 black migration destroyed Protestant, Jewish and catholic neighborhoods of all economic social religious and ethnic groups, not just Catholics.

    After the war first black criminals and feral black youts took over White politicians catered to them and Whites fled the black cities as Central Asian tribes fled from Attila the Hun.

    The thing is, blacks are mostly Protestants and most Catholics are White.

    The black Protestant invasion was wasn’t anti catholic. It was just practical. Maybe if we hadn’t passed the 1925 anti immigration laws we would have had a sufficient supply of European men to man both the military and war industry.

    We all know how and why the cities were destroyed by the WW2 migration. It’s not worth thinking about 80 years later. All we can do now is save ourselves if we can.

    • Replies: @utu
  123. @SolontoCroesus

    I can’t speak for others, but growing up in the late 50s/early 50s “neighborhood” and “community” used to be interchangeable. Both were geographic locations, usually with an ethnic predominance. The reference to them being racial or religious is a more recent phenomenon, other than “Chinatown”. Of course, people understood that people wanted to be with “their own”, and part of that was religion. The “German” neighborhood in my city had both Catholics and Protestants.

  124. More Jew agitprop pushing the Jews’ favorite canard, the Jews as the perennial victims.

    the Jews won’t mention the that the Jews were the very first nation to declare war, 1933, in what became the Second Zionist World War or that the Nazis were their partners in Crime, the Haavara Agreement.

    Jews are a virus. A Jew is an infection.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  125. Anon[145] • Disclaimer says:
    @gay troll

    For an atheist you sure are a diehard defender of Papistry. I guess you like the racism, sexism, and homophobia but actual divinity escapes you?

    Alden’s views on religion and culture (not his racialist views!) are a lot like those English atheist historian and writer Tom Holland. Intellectuals like Nassim Taleb are big fans of Tom Holland’s work. Holland, educated at Oxford and Cambridge, credits Christianity— the Catholic Church— with all that is good in Western civilization. Holland has produced historical programs for the BBC and Channel 4 which are downright “papist”. Conversely he produced a program for the BBC on Islam which was critical of Islam and for which he received a slew of death threats.

    • Thanks: gay troll
    • Replies: @ivan
  126. @Alden

    The Passover Seder, the night Jesus was arrested.

    The Seder (order) did not exist then and was invented after A.D. 70 even though Scott Hahn claimsth last supper was a seder.

    The notes in Catena Aurea and the teachings of the council of Trent both show tt was no seder.

    The Seder (see jewish encyclopedia) has to be eaten standing and includes both men and women.

    It was all all male Last Supper/First Mass

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  127. Anon[318] • Disclaimer says:

    In the West outside of Israel, ethnonationalists are the “Far Right” and badpeople. Legislation is made to defend against their social and political interests.

    This is mandated by institutional Judaism.

    In Israel and in Judaism, ethnonationalists are normative goodJews. Anyone who isn’t is a “self hating Jew”. Legislation is made to protect their social and political interests.

    This is mandated by institutional Judaism.

    Who controls the West as a foreign usurping group is not up for debate.

    • Agree: mark green, tomo
  128. Alden says:
    @gay troll

    I’m not an atheist, I just don’t believe in God or the fairy tales. I don’t care enough about it to be an atheist. As for the gospel, that’s what it says. Jesus said this and that. I don’t like atheism because it’s an anti Christian anti European people’s movement.

    I’m also a historian. I look at what the Catholic Church did, such as the calendar we use and the worlds greatest museums and libraries. I look at what Protestants did, nada nothing but return to the Jewish part of the Bible and Jewish style dog eat dog capitalism justified by some crazy doctrine that only 144,000 souls will go to heaven
    I have no interest in listening to some ridiculous debate based on a genocidal pornographic homicidal book of Jewish fairy tales, beloved by Protestants

    I LOOK at what American Catholics have done, 70 percent of American health care and hospitals and a separate private school system where White children of all religions are protected from Common Core and black savages.

    I’m a cynic and realist. I stick to the old French Standard. look at what is done, don’t listen to what is said.
    Catholics do good things. Protestants talk about the Jewish Bible.
    Send your kids to an integregated public school where they will be bombarded by anti White propaganda from kindergarten on. Send your kids to public school whereblack Protestant animals will bully beat rob and abuse them

  129. A seder has both men and women participating.

    The Last Supper/First Mass had only men in attendance – The Apostles. What happened in that upper room was not a seder, although it has been popularly described as such.


    Seder, is nowhere to be found in the Gospels. Rather, renowned Jewish Scholars, like, Baruch Bosker (“Origins of the Seder”) observe that the Seder (Order) traditions (according to Rabbinical literature) bring us only back as far as 70 A.D. the time after the destruction of Jerusalem and there is no evidence in Rabbinical literature of a Seder prior to that.

    As for Christian Catholics, that claim runs afoul of Sacred Tradition as, to just cite a few sources, the exegesis complied about the Institution of the Eucharist in, Catena Aurea, teaches us; “But how is our Lord said to sit down, whereas the Jews eat the Passover standing?”

    But even more conclusive is this; “Council of Trent (Sess. 22, c. 1): “After Christ had celebrated the ancient Passover, which the multitude of the sons of Israel sacrificed in memory of their going out of Egypt, He instituted a new Passover, that He Himself should be immolated by the Church (ab ecclesia), by means of (per) the priests, under (sub) visible signs, in memory of His passage from this world to the Father, when He redeemed us by the shedding of His Blood, and delivered us from the power of darkness, and translated us to His Kingdom.”

    Here is the exegesis of Cornelius a Lapide:

    And supper being over, when Satan had put it into the heart of Judas, the son of Simon the Iscariot, to betray Him. After the legal supper and the common supper too, before the Sacred Supper—the institution of the Eucharist—Christ washed the feet of His disciples; for by this washing He wished to show with how great purity and humility we ought to approach the Eucharist. Observe that Christ partook of a triple supper with His disciples, the ceremonial, the ordinary supper, and the Supper of the Eucharist. In families of ample means, the lamb being insufficient to satisfy the hunger of so many persons, there usually followed the ordinary supper, at which they ate other kinds of meat. And so Christ washed the feet of the Apostles after the two former suppers and before the third. And hence it is clear this washing of feet was not merely the ordinary usage of the Jews according to which they were accustomed to wash the feet of their guests, but a sacramental ablution, by which Christ was preparing His disciples for the reception of the Eucharist, converting the ordinary usage into a sacred ceremony. So that they are in error who gather from this passage that Christ washed the feet of His disciples after the Eucharistic Supper and before the lengthy discourse which He then made them, and which is subjoined by John. Of this number is S. Cyprian, or whoever is the author of the “Treatise on the Washing of Feet.” “The Lord,” he says, “had now distributed to the Apostles the Sacrament of His Body; Judas had now gone out; when, rising from the table, He girt Himself with a towel, and at the knees of Peter the Lord Himself, on bended knee, about to wash the feet of His servant, discharged towards him an office of consummate humility.”

  130. Anon[318] • Disclaimer says:
    @gay troll

    It is up for debate as to whether your ignorance of history , theology, or sociopolitics better condemns you as worthless.

    • Agree: Alden
  131. manc says:

    I watched this miniseries because I’m a sucker for alternative history novels and adaptations (Fatherland by Robert Harris and SS/GB by Len Deighton are the two best).

    After a while The Plot Against America was just some dude scaring the hell out of his family at dinner and freaking out listening to Walter Winchell.

  132. Wally says:

    perverted Rabbi performs bris ritual /circumcision:

  133. Wally says:

    Here you go, Kristallnacht debunked:

    Crystal Night’ 1938: The Great Anti-German Spectacle, By Ingrid Weckert:

    Deconstructing the Kristallnacht Myth:

    Kristallnacht..greatest false flag ever?:

    • Thanks: Curmudgeon
  134. @Digital Samizdat

    Just two choices. Live as under-mensch or liberate yourself.

    • Agree: tomo
  135. Anon[146] • Disclaimer says:

    Yes, “male genital mutilation” is commonplace in the USA due to promotion by the “health community” as a hygiene issue, which is totally dishonest.

    Modern widespread infant-involuntary genital mutilation stemming from a bronze age human sacrifice cult will serve to historically damn the modern world above much else (virtually all Jewish holidays are about murdering outsiders, and their animal sacrifices are symbolic stand-ins for human sacrifice of their enemies – which is why Christ, as the sacrcificial Jewish victim / lamb that rises from the dead is so hated by Jews).

    Circumsicion has deep cultic significance that generally only the Rabbis have knowledge of. Its true meaning reveals it as a ritual that is only suitable for Jews. The ritual has fully bled into gentile culture and none of them have any idea what the actual symbolism means when they have their infant’s foreskin removed. If they knew, they wouldn’t do it (as if there needed to be a ‘good’ symbolic reason not to do mutilate the genitals of children).

    • Replies: @tomo
  136. @Curmudgeon

    I think that is what caused Adolf Hitler to remove The Third Reich from the League of Nations…

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
  137. gay troll says:

    You really lose me with the ad hominem racism. I grew up in integrated liberal public school systems and I live in California. I have seen plenty of blackness first hand and I have witnessed its intelligence and empathy. Even if there are racial differences that manifest in behavior or intelligence, this is no reason to denigrate the divine soul within every human being or to deny them their God given rights. Catholicism is just as supremacist as Judaism, and despite the pretty philosophies of Jesus, the Roman church has long carried itself like the Jews, leaving a trail of human blood in its wake, armed with the justification of being God’s elect. Even Christ himself taught that we are to love ALL men and women as we love our kin and neighbors. Yet people like you defend a vision of Christendom that is racist. It is the Protestants who put greater faith in the teachings of Jesus, and the Catholics who defend the chauvinism of the Old Testament.

    • Replies: @Alden
  138. anarchyst says:

    I must impart my Catholic school experiences…
    Initially, I attended an excellent, all-white Catholic school, the atmosphere that was geared to whites and was totally conducive to learning. A pleasant atmosphere was a constant; troublemakers were dealt with, sanctioned and expelled as needed. This school also warned us about nefarious practices of the “tribe”, as well.
    Fast forward to the fourth-grade…due to difficult family financial circumstances among other things, I was “forced” to go to a different ((Catholic)) school.
    The differences between my previous Catholic school and my “new” school were like night and day.
    This “Catholic” school catered to the “orcs”. The teachers (nuns) and priests were part of the “new social movement”, the “civil-rights (for some)” movement being the highlight of the day. Learning was secondary to pushing the “civil-rights (for some)” and the fledgling “social justice” movement that was just getting started.
    The curriculum was “watered down” as well, in deference to its increasing “orc” student population. It seemed that everything was centered around their “success”, although us white students were capable of much more. Among us whites, our academic potential was “stunted” by the mindless, endless misbehavior and tomfoolery by the “orcs”, who were always causing disruptions to those of us whites who were accustomed to “real” learning.
    I probably would have been better off going to a local “public school”, despite “public schools” being infected with “orc” mentality as well.
    The Catholic Church “school system” is so “cucked” nowadays that they will offer tuition-free “scholarships” to non-Catholic minorities while denying a Catholic education to poor Catholic whites who (should be more than) qualified for scholarships or reduced tuition.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Alden
  139. ricpic says:

    E. Michael Jones and Unzites hate and fear Jews as much as Roth hated and feared goyim.

    Pot meet kettle.

    • Replies: @Anon
  140. tomo says:

    As a foreigner in the US I often wondered why they do it (apart from doctors promoting it and trying to trick mothers into approving it because these doctors make a few thousand USD in a few minutes – there was an article about this fraud in Mens Health mag years ago) .An American friend told me when she was giving birth – although she explicitly said she does not want her baby circumcised, the predatory US doctor still tried to trick her to approve while she was drugged out and confused right after the delivery
    I’ve come to a conclusion it’s done as a part of a comprehensive child abuse to turn children basically into cultish slaves.
    The lesson is meant to teach the victims that obviously they don’t even have any control over their own bodies. So shut up and obey the master slave.
    And to make them never forget that they are ‘different’
    However you look at it it’s child abuse (but so is most religion).
    I read somewhere that it was Kellogg – the owner of the cereal company (who prided himself of not even having sex with his wife) who promoted this barbarism.

    Also it explains why Americans need lubricant to masturbate – nobody apart from Jews/Muslims/Americans needs moisturizer since we have foreskin to reduce the friction.

    • Replies: @BenKenobi
  141. ” In 1933 Hitler told Max Planck, “I have nothing against the Jews qua Jews. But the Jews are all communists, and these are my enemies, and it is against them that I am fighting.” ”

    This strikes me as questionable.

    Anyone who lived through Weimar would have seen the signs of Jewish domination of Germany becoming more apparent. Raul Hilberg himself noted that Jews ran the brothels, cabarets, and other institutes of decadence (including Magnus Hirschfeld and his institute, pioneers in gender change surgery). Jewish venture capital swooped in on postwar Germany, snapping up key assets and real estate. Germans were turned out of their homes to beg on the street, while Jews purchased assets at rock bottom prices.

    There were various financial scandals involving Jews all throughout that period, and the team that negotiated the Versailles Treaty was heavily Jewish.

    I simply can’t believe that Hitler wrote all that off and focused solely on communism.

    As an aside, EMJ appears to believe in the holocaust, which is surprising given that he is astute on most matters .

    As for Lindberg stating that “[no] person with a sense of dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany”, this is a disappointment. Given the predatory relationship between Jews and gentiles in Poland, Germany, the UK and other countries, the simple truth is that Europeans were TOO tolerant. The Chinese or Mongols would have strung them up from lampposts for even half.

    Every group is more than justified in preventing outsiders from dominating it, whether by overt means (invasion by armies) or by infiltration and subversion. I see nothing in Christianity to mitigate this fact, and Jesus goes so far as to tell his followers to be as wise as serpents.

    • Replies: @Wally
  142. Truth3 says:

    I’ll take one Catholic’s accomplishments and roughly balance out a thousand Jew Criminals with it.

    The Catholic? Father Charles Coughlin.

    Name one other in the 20th Century who told more truth t More People.


    • Replies: @Alden
  143. @Alden

    I’m not an atheist, I just don’t believe in God or the fairy tales.

    I come from a nominally Protestant background and I must agree. Fortunately, most white Protestants in America are losing their religion. This I consider a healthy development.

    It’s time to put aside Bronze age fairy tales. Jesus, Moses and Abraham were were all flat-earthers. They were all creationists. These ancient sages had no understanding of biology, geology, astronomy, or astrogeophysics. In the ancient world, the primitive idea of ‘hell’ surely arose from observing volcanic activity (pyroclastic flows.) Pre-scientific peoples had no idea that the earth was round with tectonic plates and a molten core.

    What the ancients called ‘heaven’ is what we now understand is outer space.

    But Jews remain uniquely unified and intact by their embrace of one core belief: they are a distinct and separate people. This view still animates them.

    The enduring Jewish belief in inborn human differences also underlies the basis for Jewish continuity. The explains why, in Israel, you will never see any TV shows or ‘entertainment’ which glamorize sex or family-formation between Jews and Arabs. Are you kidding? Sell that junk to the goyim.

    Every non-Jew unfortunate enough to be born in Israel understands this sorry fact. In the land of Jews, they are second-class citizens. Jews harbor little no guilt or shame over this fact. After all, they are God’s chosen people. Besides, irrational and virulent ‘anti-Semitism’ forces Jews to erect barriers. There you have it.

    Meanwhile, Hollywood Jews love churning out sexual imagery that involves the coupling of a lovely blond female with a muscular negro. Sweet revenge. Guided miscegenation is one of their favorite tricks. Race-mixing also undermines white cohesion. This enhances Jewish security.

    Contrary to modern, ‘inclusive’ norms and ethics, Jews still embrace one enduring fact:

    Blood is thicker than water or any transient pie-in-the-sky ideology.

    (Just don’t tell that to the goyim.)

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @utu
  144. Jake says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    That Jewish freaking out over things have not happened is the hysteria that Freud built a career on. Freud saw it in Jewish women (and the kind of Viennese shiksas who congregated socially with Jews), but is a much larger than a gender thing; it is indeed ethnic.

    That such paranoia, propped up by the wildest flights of fancy and desire for sweeping revenge against multitudes among whom you demand to be able to live, crosses centuries and continents is best explained by its being about supernatural things; it is about religion and spirituality. It is about Jews driven insane by generational rejection 0f Christ. which calls upon them to wage culture war against everything to do with what once was Christendom.

  145. Alden says:

    Then there’s that Polish Pope whass his name who with the help of catholic Lech Walesa and the few remaining White Catholics in CIA etc who survived affirmative action in favor of black Protestants ; brought down the Jewish evil empire of soviet Russia.

    My main interest is affirmative action. Racially, it was discrimination against Whites. Religiously, it was discrimination in favor of black Protestants. Hmmmmmmm

  146. Anon[380] • Disclaimer says:

    E. Michael Jones and Unzites hate and fear Jews as much as Roth hated and feared goyim.

    Pot meet kettle.

    Not so.

    E Michael Jones and Unz readers do not follow a religion that calls for the domination of Jews in their own nation, the overthrow and murder of Jewish Kings, the murder of Jews, “religious” rituals that celebrate the murder of Jews, etc.

    Jews do follow such a religion that calls for all of these things to be effected with non-Jews as the targets.

    Moreover, E Michael Jones and Unz readers have not colonized Israel with such a religion. Jews have colonized every Western nation with such a religion.

    Your attempt to draw a parallel between how Jews and non-Jews approach one another is a laugh out loud riot, at best.

    Jews approach their targets with pure aggressive maliciousness from within the nations of the targets, as documented by both the mandates of the Jewish religion and the millenia old and consistent complaints of their targets. The targets simply react as anything living would when existentially threatened.

    The only thing that Jews have to do to stop this cycle is to cease practicing their out-dated cult of domination or to retreat to their own nation to practice it where it can’t harm anyone. That they do not do this means that the reward is larger than all risk: risk that includes events that are on the scale of the fabled Holocaust.

    • Replies: @Birhan Dargey
  147. Jake says:

    Luther showed the Judaizing that animated him by removing from Lutheran Bibles those Old Testament books that Jews rejected at the close of the 1st century AD. Luther, then, was declaring that anti-Christ Jews, not the historic Christian Church, had the right to declare what was and was not pre-Christ scripture.

    The entire Reformation is defined by waves of Judaizing ideas, all of which gain the most power in terms of politics and culture among the English Elites, first the Court and hereditary nobility centered around the Court, and then, much more importantly, among the rising and expanding middle class becoming the non-Noble rich. That process is finalized with the Anglo-Saxon Puritans. That culture is the one that rules the Anglo-Zionist Empire today, and ruled the first phase 0f Anglo-Zionist Empire when its capital was London.

    English culture, Anglo-Saxon culture, WASP culture, spread Judaizing heretical ideas around the globe via the British Empire and then the American Empire.

    You cannot separate today’s Jewish Problem from today’s WASP Problem. You cannot solve the Jewish problem unless you also solve the WASP problem.

    • Agree: Seraphim
    • Replies: @Alden
  148. T. Weed says:
    @Jack McArthur

    There were “anti-Semites” ever since there were Semites. It didn’t start with Christianity, “Christ killers” etc. The Roman historian Tacitus called the Jews “an obnoxious tribe” who love themselves and hate the rest of mankind, and there were pogroms before Jesus was born.

  149. Alden says:

    I’m old enough to remember those pictures of a northern city non bearded rabbi, a white collar black suit priest and nuns in the full regalia leading those matches south for civil rights.

    A cynic such as myself would think the northern civil rights movement was revenge on the White southerners for breeding the Orcs that destroyed the northern cities. I never went to catholic schools nor did my children, secular private schools. But the grandchildren go to secular and catholic high schools and even fundamentalist what they call Christian grade schools.

    Nowadays the California parish grade schools seem full of Hispanics and the high schools full of anything but black. Lots of sort of catholic Asians and whatever dot Indians in the private high schools. In San Francisco, Los Angeles and California, only black Catholics went to catholic schools and they were expected to behave like everyone else. Most black Catholics are from Louisiana, are mulatto to octoroon and are more civilized than the dark brown Protestant Bible thumping hooting and hollering Orcs.

    I think the SJW catholic clergy critters have turned from the Orcs to Hispanic immigrants as their new pets for charity work. Thanks be to God and all his saints and angels.

    Too bad your family had to move. That’s another thing I dislike about blacks. It takes so much money to escape them.

  150. Culpepper says:

    Did FDR fund the Spanish republicans?

  151. Hibernian says:

    …no hospitals…

    In the Upper Midwest there a fair number of Protestant hospitals, many of them Lutheran. The Rush Medical Center in Chicago, which is very good although not as good as the U. of Chicago or Northwestern, was up to some time in the ’80s or thereabouts called Presbyterian St. Luke’s; St. Luke’s was an Episcopalian hospital which merged with Presbyterian to form this hospital. (Also part of the complex is the Rush medical university. It has an interesting history going back to the pre-Civil War era. It closed around the beginning of WW2 and reopened in the early ’70s.)

    • Replies: @Alden
  152. The ROOT cause of their JEWISH fate is this mythical CHOSEN people IDEA, jewish supremacy racial, cultural, etc. their deep pathological chosen people divine DNA neurothical syndrome. This intellectual, religious frame work that led them to invade Canaan the homeland fo the Palestinians since 5K yrs ago, jews subverted the empires/ states of Summerian, Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Roman, Greek, and now the Christian muslims and anglo saxon races must be exterminated. Jews provoked famine, world hunger, world economics collapses, slavery, pedo mafias, usury bondage, world wars, civil wars, diamond wars, child sex trafficking, universal kosher/holocausts taxes on goyims, chosen by whom? when? to do what? why do we believe them???BUT how long shall the gentiles fear the jews, 99% fears the 1%? why? how long?? when will the anglo aryan saxon races REclaim their thrones. The USA is bankrupt dilapidated racial powder keg, losing its best young fighting jewish wars, the future is either a absolute destiny of perpetual slavery or FREEDOM…

  153. @Anon

    IF Roth (a jew) were to visit hillbilly or a balck/latino neighbirhood he will NOT be seen as a jew..he would be a WHITE man…Jews do not INTEGRATE rather they insulate. They 9jews) enjoy ALL the privileges of the WHITES goyim in anonymity, in other words they enjoy, use, abuse, all the advanteges that tehir perceive WHITENESS give them, whom they HATE deeply, and which they do not REnounce…

  154. Jim Crow says:

    Jews are so disgusting. Spill blood to liberate them and their gratitude? Flood America with the 3rd world and destroy her from the inside.

  155. Alden says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Who cares what you think and write about?

    If you don’t like the Catholic Church stop using the Catholic calendar adjusted and devised in the Vatican observatory by catholic astronomers and mathematicians named the Georgian calendar for the Pope who figured it was time to adjust the calendar because after 1,500 years the old Julius Cesar calendar was seriously in accurate.

    And stop reading books which were invented by catholic monks to replace scrolls without chapters, paragraphs and indexes. And throw away your reading glasses if you use them, another useful thing invented by followers of the Whore of Babylon and Scarlet Woman of Rome.

    There’s a few sites run by anti catholic fundamentalist Bible thumpers like yourself. Go post on them. Wank away discussing the Jewish book of fairy tales.

    Meanwhile I’ll take a look at Christus Rex, an online view of some of the Vatican art collection.

  156. Alden says:

    Yes, there are a very few hospitals founded by Protestants. But more than 70 percent of the hospitals in this 30 percent Catholic country are catholic hospitals.

    Don’t listen to what Protestants say. . Look at what Catholics do. In the 1600s, 1700s and 1800s Protestants founded hundreds of colleges. Almost all but a few such as the ludicrous Liberty and Bob Jones university have been taken over by atheist Marxist gay tranny anti White Jews and liberals.

    The catholic universities and colleges remain run by the Catholic Church and have resisted the gay tranny atheist Marxist anti White crapola as much as possible, submitting only when compelled by court orders.

    Don’t listen to what Protestants say look at what Catholics do.

    • Replies: @EldnahYm
    , @Hibernian
  157. Alden says:

    Something else I remember because affirmative action is my bete noir. Before scumbag pos Richard Nixon created the affirmative action Hispanic race by executive order in 1970, some sort of official Catholic Bishop organization endorsed affirmative action.

    At that time, the only affirmative action beneficiaries were Protestants, black Protestants but still mostly Protestants. And the scumbag pos Catholic bishops approved of it. Think of all the whining about No Irish Need Apply and alleged discrimination against catholic immigrants the Catholics complained about.

    And then the leadership endorsed affirmative action for the most Protestant ethnic group in America. F’ em all.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  158. Alden says:

    Martin Luther’s sponsor and protector was his most catholic majesty, Charles 1, King of Spain, overlord of Portugal and ruler of the vast Spanish and Portuguese empires and also the Holy Roman Emperor Charles 5. Were it not for Charles, Luther might be just another St Martin the reformer or exiled to some frozen monastery in N Silesia to translate bibles or something

    Charles 5&1’s Motive ; break the power of the papacy in Europe.

    The reformation wasn’t just the Jews and Protestants obsessed and wanking away while reading the pornographic sadistic Jewish Bible.

    Many things came together. From a historical point of view, His Most Catholic Majesty Charles 5&1 was more important than any other factor. For instance , Charles was the man who forced Henry 8 to take Britain away from Rome so he could divorce himself.

  159. Alden says:
    @gay troll

    It’s the Protestants who dumped the Christian part of the Bible and wallowed in the sadistic homicidal genocidal pornographic Jewish part of the Bible. You don’t even know the meaning of the word catholic do you? It’s the Greek word for universal, not chauvinistic as you claim.

    Blacks are Protestants, nuff said.

  160. S says:
    @L Bean

    There’s no there there, except the nazi. The nazi is always always there, just around the corner, married to your wife’s friend, in local government, or even YOUR BOSS.

    A good discerning eye there.

    There’s a full on effort to demonize just about all Euros as individuals (and peoples) as wannabe or potential Nazis!TM, symbolized by Trump, it not particularly mattering if you or your family are (or were) so called ‘progressives’ in good standing, having relatives who may well have fought (and sometimes died) in WWII purposely and specifically against National Socialist Germany. Witness the abuse Hillary supporters got from Obama’s people during the 2008 election.

    Like Saturn, the revolution devours it’s children.

    George Orwell got a lot right right in his 1984, a seeming ‘how to’ book for some powerful people and hangers on nowadays, but being human, got some things wrong. As it stands, rather than someone with a name such as Emmanuelle Goldstein being the subject of the daily ‘Two Minutes Hate’, it’s someone with the initials ‘A H’, ‘whose agents are everywhere’.

    “The program of the Two Minutes Hate varied from day to day, but there was none in which Goldstein was not the principal figure. He was the primal traitor, the earliest defiler of the Party’s purity. All subsequent crimes against the Party, all treacheries, acts of sabotage, heresies, deviations, sprang directly out of his teaching.’

    ‘Somewhere or other he was still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters, perhaps even — so it was occasionally rumoured — in some hiding-place in Oceania itself.”

    I wouldn’t be surprised if all of these storylines were ACTUALLY computer generated these days.

    Also from Part 1, Chapter 1 of 1984 as the previous quote, this time in reference to Julia, Winston’s soon to be lover. Hmmm…

    ‘…she worked in the Fiction Department. Presumably — since he had sometimes seen her with oily hands and carrying a spanner she had some mechanical job on one of the novel-writing machines.

  161. Seraphim says:
    @Mick Jagger gathers no mosque

    All discussions around the institution of the Eucharist miss the essential point, namely that it was a sacrifice which existed also in the Old Law, where it was called ‘todah’, which means literally ‘thanksgiving’, in Greek ‘eucharistia’. The todah sacrifice was offered by a person whose life had been redeemed or delivered from a great danger. It was also a ‘peace offering’ including the eating of a sacrificial meal (the lamb) and it was the only sacrifices in which non-priests were permitted to share in the meal. The sacrificial meal was accompanied by offerings of loaves of leavened bread (lehem/artos). It was also a ‘sacrifice of praise’, i.e. recitation of psalms of thanksgiving.
    At the Liturgy the priest clearly announces that it offers an ‘oblation of peace’, which consists of the bread and wine brought in by the people, on behalf of the people who responds ‘the mercy of peace, the sacrifice of praise’.
    The Passover sacrifice was also a ‘todah’ sacrifice in remembrance of the deliverance of the people of Israel from slavery, the pre-figuration of the deliverance of Mankind from sin and death. The Christ reconfigured the Passover meal around his own self-sacrifice in a manner that more perfectly expressed its nature as ‘todah. The Eucharist is a sacrifice of thankgivings for what the Christ has done for Mankind, delivering it from death. This is the sense of ‘I came not to abolish the law, but to complete, to make full (pleroo) the law.

    • Agree: Hibernian
  162. EldnahYm says:

    Yes, there are a very few hospitals founded by Protestants. But more than 70 percent of the hospitals in this 30 percent Catholic country are catholic hospitals.

    70 percent? Not even close.

    Catholic hospitals have expanded in the 2000s(look it up if you don’t believe me), before that they were much smaller players. You want to present a story wherein the U.S. would be starving for hospitals if not for Catholics, in reality all that’s happened is that Catholic hospitals are currently doing a better job of scamming the taxpayer. Like any other big business, they aggressively compete for market share. One of the main mechanisms for this is mergers. However even with all of this activity, Catholic affiliated hospitals are nowhere near 70% of total hospitals.

  163. S says:

    There was a 1971 movie called Murphy’s War which starred Peter O’Toole as ‘Murphy’, the lone Irish survivor of a merchant ship sunk by a German u-boat off the coast of South America near WWII’s end. [The almost standard atrocity narrative is present in this movie. The sub is shown machine gunning the ship survivors as they desperately attempt to swim ashore. The u-boat’s captain personally guns down the merchant ship’s wounded float plane pilot in his sick bed at the local coastal village.]

    Murphy, wanting revenge, seeks out various means of sinking the sub which continues to lurk nearby where Murphy has made it ashore.

    All his attempts fail, including bombing it with Molotov cocktails from the air using the merchant ship’s surviving float plane, and ramming it with a floating crane.

    Meanwhile, the war has ended, but not for Murphy. And, even though the sub has gotten stuck in the mud while submerged, and it, and it’s crew, may well be finished as it is, this is not enough for Murphy. He wants his desire for personal revenge satiated and to see the whole crew of the German sub dead dead by his own hand.

    Murphy finds an unexploded torpedo fired by the sub earlier, and using the floating crane he drops the torpedo on top of the trapped German sub. Satiating his hatred and desire for revenge, Murphy destroys the sub and kills it’s crew, but also kills himself.

    Besides shattering the German sub, the torpedo’s explosion sinks Murphy’s floating crane as well, with the collapsed crane having pinned Murphy to it’s hulk. The last scene of the movie is of Murphy himself drowning simultaneously with the hated Nazis!TM.

    There’s a message in there somewhere.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  164. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    “My general impression of E. Michael Fanatic is that he is against the Jews because they don’t accept Papal rule over his Judeo-Christian religion.”

    Jones pens a long piece that has nothing whatever to do with the papacy and uses Roth’s execrable novel, The Plot Against America, as an example of Jewish self-obsession unleashed.

    And your comment is that?

    Was it supposed to be relevant in any way to this article or just something that randomly occurred to you?

    • Replies: @Alden
  165. utu says:

    “The Slaughter of Cities: Urban Renewal As Ethnic Cleansing” by E. Michael Jones

  166. utu says:
    @mark green

    “Jesus, Moses and Abraham [did not know quantum physics and did not know how to code].” – I thought you were a thoughtful person, Mark Green, but you are just another fool.

  167. anarchyst says:

    Good point!

    Nixon made “Hispanics” a race.

    Trump made “jews” a race.

    We live in interesting times, indeed.


  168. Sparkon says:

    Did somebody say “fear” here? Speaking of lurid entertainment, check out the bizarre “Sex Nazi” men’s adventure magazine covers from the ’50s and ’60s.

    Psst. Now follow me back to a magazine rack where the Nazis were still in command and torturing pretty young virgins.

    Man’s Story, September 1964, cover art: Norm Eastman, model: Eva Lund

    During their peak in the late 1950s, approximately 130 men’s adventure magazines were being published simultaneously.

    The interior tales usually claimed to be true stories. Women in distress were commonly featured in the painted covers or interior art, often being menaced or tortured by Nazis or, in later years, Communists. Typical titles which relied on especially lurid and salacious cover illustrations include Man’s Story, Men Today, World of Men, and Man’s Epic.

    • LOL: schnellandine
    • Replies: @utu
    , @the grand wazoo
  169. Alden says:
    @Oscar Peterson

    Ann nonny nous is just another bible thumping anti catholic like priss factor aka Betty Catherine McChesney and others who haunt pro White and conservative sites posting anti catholic KKK Calvinist garbage.

  170. Seraphim says:

    And who founded and funded the Free Masonry?

  171. @wesmouch

    They believe they are chosen, ie, superior, more intelligent, generally more wealthy, more aware of what’s really going — while the rest of us are cattle, sub-human, dumber, oblivious to the real game, ignorant of the ways of money.

    It doesn’t have to be a religious perspective at all. It can be a secular or worldly attitude. It isn’t necessarily so stark as laid out above, but that is the general dynamic.

    They have contempt for us ultimately. The hate they expect is the natural reaction one would expect from someone who wakes up to the fact that they’ve been taken advantage of, ripped off, subverted.

    They can’t believe we’re so frickin’ ignorant. I have to agree. I lived in ignorance most of my life. That’s what too much “education” will do to you. In fact, I admired their culturally subversive work as a free thinking atheist for decades.

    Of course if you abuse a dog, you expect it to try to bite you at some point. The hate they provoke may be masochistic for some, but really it’s just a rational expectation they have that’s built into the relationship.

    By the way, I work hard not to succumb to hate, even given the fairly full understanding I now have of their sickness and the evil they perpetuate. Not succumbing to hate doesn’t mean we shouldn’t oppose their corrupting influence.

    Christ has called us to love and truth and to oppose evil. This is the ultimate reality we must sync up with.

    When we do that, “the Jews” will lose. I suppose that’s why they hate Christ.

  172. Hibernian says:

    The catholic universities and colleges remain run by the Catholic Church and have resisted the gay tranny atheist Marxist anti White crapola as much as possible, submitting only when compelled by court orders.

    Not true of Notre Dame and De Paul. The Franciscan University of Steubenville is another story.

  173. Hibernian says:

    Could have been called Murphy’s Law.

    • Replies: @S
  174. PeterMX says:

    You’re ignorant. It’s a novel because it’s a lie (actually many lies) and it has a purpose, to advance Jewish power and portray Americans as murderous Jew haters, when in fact if there had been enough “anti-semitism” in the US, the Jews would not have been able to push the US into WW II and ally it with Judeo-Bolshevik USSR.

    You’re kind of dopey. Historians are prevented from telling the truth about the Jews malevolent role in WW II and many other things, such as when the Jews forced West Point to pull David Irving’s Hitler’s War from their curriculm or when they pressured the publisher of Irving’s book on Goebbels to be pulled and not published, but Jews can make slanderous movies about others. The entire Holocaust industry is comprised of over 1,000 Hollywood movies and thousands more books that are fictional but it has allowed Jews to blackmail and extort billions of dollars from European countries and allow every lying Jew to walk into a museum, point to a painting and say his family owned it and they want it back, and many have done this.

    • LOL: Twodees Partain
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  175. BenKenobi says:

    I recently had a son, and he’ll turn one in about three weeks (thank you, thank you). When his birth was coming up I asked our mid-wife if I needed to get “NO CIRCUMCISION” in writing. I’m uncut and wanted to ensure he had this simple courtesy done as well. The mid-wife said that the procedure is now considered purely cosmetic and is no longer done in hospital (we’re in Canada) and parents now have to seek it out if they want it done. So there’s some good news.

    In recent months I’ve asked the pediatrician when is it an appropriate time to start “pulling back the skin” as part of bath procedure. We were told that this is not done for a few years and the foreskin is currently connected to the glans, and the two will naturally separate. I can only imagine what physical damage is done by cutting off the skin at less than two weeks of age.

    Not to mention the brain damage and psychological trauma this causes.

  176. S says:

    Could have been called Murphy’s Law.

    Hehe. That would of made for a good alternate movie title.

    As an aside, O’Toole’s at the time real life wife, Siân Phillips, also acted in the movie as the missionary doctor who treated his injuries. Philip’s was Welsh, and a Welsh speaker. So, at least with her, O’Toole was sticking to his Celtic roots. Good for him.

  177. Richard B says:

    It was the last time that anyone in public life in America singled out Jews as a group for criticism.

    All of the talk about antisemitism and White Supremacy is designed to conceal this obvious fact.

    They can kvetch all they want. But, the only real supremacist organization in the world today is Jewish Supremacy Inc.

    A real supremacist group not only demands to be,

    1. placed above criticism
    2. loved unconditionally
    3. blindly obeyed

    they also have the power to effectuate those insane demands.

    Oh, and speaking of kvetching, there’s only one real KKK in the world today.

    The Kvetching Kosher Khazars.

  178. @Saggy

    Jones writes 1,000 page tomes with the same dedication to thoroughness as he writes 10,000 word movie reviews.

    The scope of his work tends to span millennia. Check out his book, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History as an example of his deconstruction of Jewish subversion. He’s no Jew dick sucker. Jews who reject Christ are of the Synagogue of Satan. Direct from the New Testament.

    The length and breadth of his work points to the fact that he is a busy guy. He writes on an incredible range of topics.

    So he hasn’t written on the holohoax. Guess what? I haven’t seen anything from him on 9-11, JFK, global warming or the NWO either. Hard to write about every psyop, historical cover up and cabal out there.

    I don’t know what his stance is on the holohoax. I can see several possibilities.

    1-He never looked into it because he basically accepts the story. It’s one of those cultural assumptions he hasn’t gotten around to challenging for whatever reason. Probably because it’s outside his core range of interests. It happens. How deeply have you looked into the flaws in the theory of evolution? I ask this as a scientist. It took me 20 years before I stopped skipping past the issue and took it seriously enough to investigate.

    2-He doesn’t want to look into it because he doesn’t see any upside to it. I suspect he wouldn’t be surprised at all if it is a hoax but associating himself with it would reduce his audience. I can respect that decision. I suspect he views his mission in a more targeted manner that uncovering every fucking lie in the world.

    3-He knows it’s a hoax and he actively puts out disinformation about it. I’ve read a lot of his stuff and have never seen any indication of this. I do not get the impression he is acting as a gatekeeper.

    Chomsky, for example, is a gatekeeper, for the left. He exposes some of the workings of propaganda or the state use of terror but declares the JFK assassination coup or 9-11 truth as conspiracy theories, without any real evidence offered.

    On the holohoax, Chomsky said something along the lines of, “Even to question the holocaust is to lose one’s humanity.” What a crock of shit, especially coming from someone supposedly guided by enlightenment rationality.

    I do not get the impression Jones would say something so obviously intended to close off investigation.

    Btw, I’ve looked into the holohoax issue far enough to realize the numbers of dead Jews are enormously inflated and that the story of industrialized killing is unlikely to be true in most if not all of its parts. I know that Jews use the holohoax as one bludgeon in their propaganda war against us. Yada yada yada.

    The matrix of illusion we are trapped in goes way beyond that one aspect, no matter how important it is. Don’t make a fetish out of it or use it to cut yourself off from natural allies.

    Also expand your search. Many more lies to uncover.

    A final thing: the quote you highlighted and interpreted as supporting the holohoax is nothing of the sort, especially in the context of the movie review. As opposed to their experience in the US, do you deny that a large number of Jews got on Hitler’s shit list, ended up in work camps and died as a result?

    • Replies: @Saggy
  179. sally says:

    Yes, sort of like the Articles of Confederation that organized the separate British Colonies into a set of war parties and helped to make them capable to ran the British Army which supported the Banksters their corporations against the British Colonial government that dominated British Colony America out of Continental America in 1776-1789. It was not until 1787 that the Banksters and corporate thieves were able to re-institute control of the politics in America. They did this by replacing the government that had defeated the British Army (that is the the Articles of Confederation Government, with the Constitution of the USA Government. The constitution removed all say in affairs of state by the citizens who lived in the various American states (ex British colonies), no longer did the man on the street have a voice. The Constitution made those it governed into propaganda controlled spectators and cannon fodder soldiers capable to fight the wars between domestic and foreign Aristocrats.

    How different America would have been, if the Articles of Confederation government had been kept in place , and the separate states were able to operate without ex British Aristocrats, with the power of government, organized to defeat the people’s short lived democracy. have a look at this link, and
    remember how powerful Ottom Van Bismark was, then think the first Jewish Congress in Basel Switzerland,, 1897.. ras in response to two things: the growing demand for oil <= all oil was under the Ottoman Empire and the growing need to defeat rising, strengthening German power. also in 1871 Germany was 1% Jewish.

  180. E.M. Jones briefly proposes two different reasons why Jews supported communism, but doesn’t explore either one in depth:

    1) Jews believed it was a form of messianic determinism;
    2) Jews were taking revenge on European goys.

    Either one or both might be correct, but they represent incomplete jumps in logic, which ought to be filled in with detailed chains of reasoning from basic assumptions all the way to conclusions. For example, does the Jewish conception of messianic end-times require an egalitarian distribution of all material goods? If so, where in the Torah or Talmud is this stated? Did Jewish communists plan well ahead of time to employ retributive justice upon its citizens in the process of implementing a communist society, but otherwise such violence was unnecessary? Are there other reasons besides these two that would better explain such inherent links between Jews and communism?

    • Replies: @FactChecker
  181. anonymous[161] • Disclaimer says:

    The question is whether The Great Satan of AmeriKKKa would have been much worse than what it turned out in our current reality.

    Given that I find the Great Satan to be unspeakably evil, I somehow doubt it.

  182. @BenKenobi

    Good news. My understanding is that circumcision is becoming less popular in the US as well. I have a 1 year old boy, and was concerned with the horror stories I’d heard of docs pressuring parents to circumcise, but my concerns were unfounded.

    Pure and simple, it is genital mutilation of an innocent newborn. Absolutely barbaric. Absolutely jewish.

    I’d be interested to see a study of circumcision and erectile dysfunction. I’d bet it all that there is a strong correlation. And I’d bet there is also a correlation between circumcision and psychological issues.

  183. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    I am just curious, why the judeo before the Christian?

  184. anonymous[161] • Disclaimer says:

    there are many … (and Moslems) who likewise knowingly would choose Satan over serving Christ and Christendom.


    Thank you, but we “Moslems” have already chosen the God of Christ, and have completely rejected the accursed satan.

    Alright, since we still commit sins, the “completely rejected” part is not entirely true. But, we are working on it. 😀

    We have chosen Jesus PBUH as a most honoured prophet, and the Messiah to come later, for the salvation of all true monotheist muslims. Indeed, we have chosen all true monotheist prophets of the Almighty One, who came before him, and after him. May the peace and blessings of the One and only be upon all of them.

    “God gives you tidings of a word from Him, whose name will be Jesus Christ, son of Mary, held in honor in the world and in the hereafter, and one of those who are nearest (to God). He shall speak to the people in infancy and when middle-aged, and shall be of the righteous.” (Quran 3:45-46)

    He (the son of Mary) shall be a known sign of the Hour; so have no doubt concerning it and follow Me.” (Quran 43:61)

    As always, get it through your pagan polytheist head that bleating a falsehood, even a million times, cannot make it the actual truth, even if a billion pagans (your kind) take it to be so.

  185. @Seraphim

    Dear Seraphim. The Pluperfect Self Sacrifice of Jesus on Calvary (The Holy Holocaust) was the subsumed antitype of all of the OT holocausts.

    There are four sacrifices in the Holy Holocaust of the Mass.

    1. Holocaust offers to God as an image to His sovereign greatness.

    2. Sacrifice of Propitiation offered to appease His justice.

    3. Sacrifice of Impetration offered to implore His bounty

    4. Eucharistic sacrifice to thank Him for His bounty

    In His Holy Holocaust on Calvary His burning love for mankind substituted for the fires of the Old Testament Holocausts

    • Agree: Seraphim
    • Replies: @schnellandine
  186. @Mick Jagger gathers no mosque

    And Weebles wobble but they don’t fall down, right?

  187. Anon[162] • Disclaimer says:

    As always, get it through your pagan polytheist head that bleating a falsehood, even a million times, cannot make it the actual truth, even if a billion pagans (your kind) take it to be so.

    In the fashion that is typical of your people, you zealously parrot singularly Jewish theology with zero understanding of its meaning.

    Which is a reflection of the state of affairs that determines that you have what you have, which is nothing, because you are who you are: which is an emotionally incontinent southerner with too much testosterone and too little analysis. Similar to all such people.

    Your religion is fully fake. All of it. It is an inadequate shadow of its Judaic template, and it absolutely doesn’t serve you. In fact, it calls for your death. It even names you more explicitly than it does the rest of its targets.

    Jews think your eventual eradication will endear them to us when all of this is supposed to resolve with them at the helm of the World after a series of world-devastating wars.

    Events that your people are meant to be central to as a means of destroying the West. After which, Jews will take over all government and murder all of your people. Which is all explicitly stated in their books.

    What they didn’t count on when concocting their strategy is that the nature of information sharing would reveal that you are a product of the Jew: supported and defended by him to the present. Created by dumbing down the Jew’s theology, and then supported by him when conquering Spain and Byzantium. So there will be no gratitude on our part when you are gone. We will continue to focus on the source. And you will continue to be a tool that will eventually be disposed of by the Jew.

    In the mean time, you continue to do the work of the Jew, your murderer, in ignorantly sputter innanities about “polytheists” and “pagans”. Yet, you don’t understand a word of what you are saying. There is no other meaning in these concepts other than a mandate for your death and Jewish domination. Even a half-sincere interest in your Judaic source would reveal that. What a true monkey you are. Complete with a little suit.

    • Replies: @Antoniog
  188. anonymous[161] • Disclaimer says:

    Further to my point of muslims having “rejected the accursed satan,” take note of what we recite every time we begin our prayers.

    I seek Allah’s refuge from the accursed Satan.

    On the other hand, what about those who have associated a man, even a most blessed one, with the Almighty One? A paganism which is akin to other pagan faiths such as Hindooism… the abomination of Mangods.

    Isn’t such an abomination more in line with choosing the path of Satan, which pagans such as you hilariously accuse us true monotheists of? What a pathetic pagan you are!

    See what Islam says about your pagan triple deity, Trinity.


    O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, “Three”; desist – it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs.

    — Quran, surah 4 (An-Nisa), ayat 171[3]

    They have certainly disbelieved who say, “Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary” while the Messiah has said, “O Children of Israel, worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.” Indeed, he who associates others with Allah – Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers. They have certainly disbelieved who say, “Allah is the third of three.” And there is no god except one God. And if they do not desist from what they are saying, there will surely afflict the disbelievers among them a painful punishment. So will they not repent to Allah and seek His forgiveness? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. The Messiah, son of Mary, was not but a messenger; [other] messengers have passed on before him. And his mother was a supporter of truth. They both used to eat food. Look how We make clear to them the signs; then look how they are deluded.

    — Quran, surah 5 (Al-Ma’ida), ayat 72-75[4]

    And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, “O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, ‘Take me and my mother as deities besides Allah ?’” He will say, “Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen. I said not to them except what You commanded me – to worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. And I was a witness over them as long as I was among them; but when You took me up, You were the Observer over them, and You are, over all things, Witness. If You should punish them – indeed they are Your servants; but if You forgive them – indeed it is You who is the Exalted in Might, the Wise.

    — Quran, surah 5 (Al-Ma’ida), ayat 116-118[5]

    • Troll: Seraphim
  189. @Fatmanscoop

    Mein Kampf is fairly tepid on Jewry

    Was there any excrement, any shamelessness in any form, above all in cultural life, in which at least one Jew would not have been involved? As soon as one even carefully cut into such an abscess, one found, like maggots in a decaying body, often blinded by the sudden light, a kike

    Very tepid after all, all statesmen talk like this.

  190. Wally says:

    Also note that author Jones amateurishly resorts to citations from ‘Table Talk’ without mentioning the fact that it is filled with forgeries and intentionally false English translations.
    Table Talk, Picker:
    and of course you dodged:
    Genoud, Heim & Picker’s Hitler’s “Table Talk”: A Study in Academic Fraud & Scandal:

    – Jones also cluelessly cites Hans Frank’s diary, another creative concoction like the above.
    Hans Frank’s Diary:

  191. The Revolution invariably devours its Jews. Hence, Roth’s fear. Frank Rich noticed it in America in the wake of 9/11. The revolutionary Jews brought the revolutionary wheel in motion. The fact that many of them were crushed under the same wheel should not blind us to the responsibility they bear. That guilt will continue to have unfortunate psychological sequelae, most notably fear and guilt, as expressed in things like the novels of Philip Roth, until repentance and conversion take it away.”

    We White Goyim in the US are still waiting for that to happen. It’s been going full speed since maybe 1945.

    Excellent writing,as always, Mr. Jones

  192. @Digital Samizdat

    Ann Nonny Mouse

    What is particularly nefarious and most tragic about Roth’s work is that he is once again tarnishing the reputation of one of America’s truly great men, in Charles Augustus Lindbergh. He was not perfect by any means, no one is. A Scot Berg’s pulitzer Prize winning biography had begun to rehabilitate Lindbergh’s reputation and now this piece of trash film will be disseminating lies to millions of unsuspecting Americans who never heard of Lindbergh.

    It would of been one thing if Roth had chosen a fictitious character, but to have picked Lindbergh, whose family still feels the pain of the smear campaign that unfairly portrayed their father, grandfather as an anti-Semite is cruel, and unfair especially since Berg, who had unfettered access to all of Lindbergh’s papers, concluded that yes, Lindbergh did make anti-Semitc statements, who didn’t in those days, but he was NOT a virulent anti-Semite. Actually had Lindbergh won the Presidency there probably would not of been a Holocaust as England would of accepted Hitler’s peace proposal and we could have watched that psychopath take on a bigger psychopath that was Stalin.

  193. @BenKenobi

    I understand it has makes profound changes to the psyche

  194. Anonymous[427] • Disclaimer says:

    Jews tried to take over the world with Bolshevism and Communism in the early 20th century, they failed. A hundred years later they’re trying again with Capitalism, and this time they’re succeeding mightily. Then the pandemic came along. Or maybe it too is part of the plan, to take down a potential threat and pave the way for their total dominance.

    Clearly the wrong side won in WWII, and we are paying the price today, including this pandemic brought on by globalization pushed by the Jewish globohomo. If men like Lindberg and Ford had been president, there wouldn’t be a pandemic today.

    • Agree: Richard B
  195. @Sean

    In the darkest days towards the end of WW2 Hitler was still going on about German-American engineers building the planes that were bombing German cities and factories, and taking about 50% on Germany’s resources to combat.

    And after Amrica ran out of “Nazis” they never again went to the moon.

  196. @thotmonger

    We interviewed Wayne Cole in his home a few years before he passed for a documentary that we finally are going back into production… brilliant man… we discussed this book and had an in depth conversation about Charles.

    you may enjoy his interview;

    this one of his daughter Reeve reveals the pain these monsters have caused these beautiful people

    would appreciate your insights on our web site


    • Thanks: utu
  197. E. Michael Jones pulled off a well researched “déconfiture” of Philip Roth and i applaud it. Roth craved reader empathy for his own tribe, without much of a return gesture. He stole the misery of others to enhance the plights of his own. That’s lower than low and faker than fake. Gojim should boycot Roth’s work and any spin-off of it.

    I have learned that two questions bring good answers; “why” (motive) and “why now” (moment in time). The “why” is known. It’s sensing backlash when Jews have once again pushed their interests too far, and Jewish coalmine canaries happen to be trained to chirp “antisemitism!” Roth chirps that, and a lot of false notes.

    “Why now” applies to 2004 (the book) and 2020 (the TV-series). Look for things in those years that caused resentment and in which Jews were involved. For the decade up to 2004 i give you a few names, like Madeleine Albright, Larry Summers, Alan Greenspan, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Robert Rubin, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Scooter Libby, Richard Fuld jr., George Soros, Carl Icahn, Ivan Boesky. You will undoubtedly recall the aftermaths related to each name.

    For 2020, check nowadays’ media articles featuring Jewish nuisances. Plenty of choice , causing lots of resentment. There were also reasons within the TV-world to bring out the series this year. Home Box Office saw market share leaking away to Netflix and Amazon Prime TV. Owner WarnerMedia decided to whip HBO into better performance. In 2019, Warner’s chair John Stankey said as much before a grand assembly of HBO personnel, and to HBO chair Richard Plepler “Yes, you turn a profit. Just not enough”. He then put Robert Greenblatt (ex-NBC) in Plepler’s place, and there is now new rock hard Jewish focus on the bottom line. Greenblatt’s HBO Max streaming service is a head-on attack on Netflix and “The Plot” is an answer to the “Hunters” TV-series on Amazon, produced by David Weil. Greenblatt is a seasoned judge of TV content with view rate potential and the Plot’s producer David Simon is from a family with antisemitism-fighting in its core values. His father was a PR director at B’nai B’rith. I invite you to look up for yourself what that is.

    HBO is intent on growing worldwide. Here in the Netherlands, “The Plot Against America” has been announced with much fanfare. On the Dutch HBO website, one sentence in the text, praising David Simon’s production, claims that “Roth’s novel couldn’t have been in better hands”. Indeed, it was just what HBO needed. Jewish productions against antisemitism tend to deliberately draw away attention from high echelon Jewish power and their grander schemes. Bankers, globalist zionists and venture capitalist are suddenly shoved behind the curtains and Jewish suffering is something of common people level; the miserable youths and harsh lives of discriminated underdogs. Roth’s book is such a Jewish production. And it’s fiction, which allows more “artistic liberties”.

    Several European governments, like those of Macron and Merkel, have noticed a rise of antisemitic sentiments in their citizens, so they also welcome publications that may help put those sentiments in different perspectives. HBO has released “The Plot” in late April/ early May across Europe, the month in which the whole of Europe celebrates the end of WW2 (75 years ago now) and in which the remembrance of the holocaust and Jewish common folk suffering enjoys the peak of its yearly attention. How’s that for a “why now”?

  198. anonymous[161] • Disclaimer says:

    Yes, “male genital mutilation” is commonplace in the USA due to promotion by the “health community” as a hygiene issue, which is totally dishonest.

    Lol! You accept or reject what suits your prejudices. Who cares. You know what they say about opinions…

    So, if we ignore the hygiene aspect of it, then it should at least be about aesthetics. Studies have shown that normal women actually prefer the look of the circumcised penis (of course, in your promiscuous cesspool culture, that would be more like penises). I would imagine that is because the uncut ones resemble so much an animal’s genitalia.

    In contrast, the circumcised penis has a more human character to it. Surely, that must be more appealing to normal women (of course, in your openly homo cesspool culture, I should also include abnormal men too… *spit*)? No?

    If whitrash like you or your woman (or man… hey, whatever floats your boat, fag) prefer the uncut aesthetic, then that should betray a penchant for bestiality. Both of you got a problem there.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  199. Antoniog says:

    What a bunch of bullshit cristianity have been historically the best tool to counterattact jewish influence and one of the reasons jews hate it soo much
    It was cristian in spain , france , russia …. again and again who stand against jews and their supremacist ethno religious doctrine imposing them all kind of legal and economical limitations if they insited in practizing judaism virtually getoizing them or expulsing them , spain for exaple the paradigm of a cristian nation served to not only expulse jews and muslims unifying the country under one banner ( inquisition ) but too persecute fake cristian jews giving cristianity an ethnic marker too( limpieza de sangre) and serving as the motor to conquer new land

    A last thing cristianity is antitetical to judaismn if in judaism only jewish souls have value in cristianity any people that convert can save his souls and thats the biggest reasons jews hate cristianity it gave cristians the moral primacy to treat jews & judaism( nazism for jews) with extreme harsh measure like they deserve.

    Its with the disapearence of cristianity that jewish influence rise unparaleled in the modern era

  200. anarchyst says:

    Your jewish roots are showing. Mutilating a perfectly good organ without medical necessity is NEVER ethical. NEVER…

    Just as women are justifiably horrified at the prospect of “female genital mutilation” they should be just as horrified by “male genital mutilation”.

    Your typical jewish habit of name-calling while defending your sick jewish practice exposes you as well.

    Females have no business dictating what a man’s penis “should look like”. “Aesthetics be damned.

    As for “normal women”, jewish women are definitely not “normal”.

    Any mother who allows her infant son to be mutilated deserves prison time, not accolades.

    Lastly, you should get checked out for undiagnosed STDS or venereal diseases that were “given” to you by your “mohel”

    Shalom, jew…

    • Replies: @Antoniog
  201. @Monotonous Languor

    Not to put words in his mouth but I believe he might say that Jewish support of communism, and dozens of other revolutionary ideas (eg, the sexual revolution) naturally derives from the Talmudic concept of Tinkun Olam. Secular Jews interpret it as “healing the world.” It is the driving force behind their sense of social justice (eg, feminism) and utopia seeking (eg, communism)

    All their destruction (see Europe and the moslem invasion supported by Jewish supported NGOs as another example) is a side effect or actually the point of trying to do good.

    The thrust of all this healing is to tear down Western Civilization, of which the chief cornerstone is Christ. (Yes, I know the Greece and Rome are key aspects too.) That’s where the connection back to screwing the goys occurs.

    They are in rebellion against their Messiah, essentially. A bunch of antichrists and proud of it. Although not Jewish myself, I was an atheist for decades and was consciously antichrist by choice. Jewish ideology sunk into my worldview pretty deeply, being an iconoclast by heart, though there was a potent element of Nietzsche and hyper-rationalism and materialism (which has a strong Jewish streak) as well.

    While I won’t claim this framework explains everything (as least not yet!), it is fairly consistent once one digs beneath the surface of most things Jewish.

    While this is a complicated topic, being a Christian who is open to truth and reason (not the caricatures that are commonly accepted) is the best antidote to the negative effects of Jewish influence.

    Actually, E Michael Jones most recent book is a multi-millennial investigation of Logos (crudely, Christ as reason) through philosophy and theology. I’m not a Catholic, so I’m not in complete agreement with him but I have a lot to learn from him and in any case we are brothers in Christ.

    PS: Jones’ book on The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit provides excellent perspective on your question and is actually a good read.

  202. Antoniog says:

    he is definitively a muslism , writte like a hyena , act like a hyena and smile like one too

  203. vinteuil says:

    Arguing with a novel is kind of conceptually dopey.

    Nonsense. When a novel comes with an ideological agenda attached (as this one clearly does) you’d have to be a dope *not* to argue with it.

    • Agree: Charon
  204. Saggy says: • Website

    I don’t know what his stance is on the holohoax.

    He actively promotes the holohoax, just as he did in this short article, referring to the hoax of the ‘annihilation of the Jews’ as if it happened.

    In his tome ‘TJRS’ he writes that it was a Jew (he gives the name which I don’t remember) who invented Zyklon which was used to gas the Jews.

    He promotes the holohoax without hesitation or shame.

    Here is the reality – ‘Christianity, like Judaism and Islam, is a perfectly absurd religion that worships a god who as described in the Old Testament, particularly in Deuteronomy and Samuel, as a genocidal maniac who wants to and does destroy not only entire peoples, including women and children, but also their farm animals, “anything that breathes”. Fact check this.

    Any person who professes to believe this horrific nonsense and who ‘worships’ this god can have no sense and real values whatever. Something is wrong with their mind.

  205. @Digital Samizdat

    “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” – Matthew 16:17-18

    How fascinating is it that papists always decontextualize their obvious proof text? And fail to notice that Christ was speaking to Peter and the Disciples, not some phony succession of “popes.”

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    , @PTD
  206. @Saggy

    God creates, and God destroys. Deal with it. If people don’t like that, then they should stop picking fights with their creator. And no, you’re not moral. Only God is.

    • Agree: Hibernian
    • Troll: Seraphim
    • Replies: @Saggy
    , @Seraphim
  207. @RVBlake

    One of the things that makes Jones so interesting for me as a person of Catholic origin is that he talks abput Catholic Power and the Catholic question in American and European history. Today most Catholics are just Protestants who like statues and Protestants are Jews without Yamakas But before the Second World War there were serious differences between Catholics and Protestants – particularly the Anglo WASP types. Catholics were more likely to sympathize with fascism – its anti individualism, its community spirit, its anti usurious capitalism and of course its disdain for the Semophilia so integral to Anglo-WASP culture. Catholics were more likely to work together then- Catholic Power if you will. The Jews and the WASPs aligned to take down Catholic Power in the interest of war with Germany and the promotion of usurious capitalism. Jones tells this history whereas academic historians give us Jewstory. White people just get blended together into some phalanx against the evil NAZI. It weren’t that way. Anyway, If you’re of Catholic origin, read Jones. He is known for nailing the Jew but he really nails the Judaized in a way you will not get from some of our White Nationalist historians of Anglo Protestant origin.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @EldnahYm
  208. Hibernian says:
    @Gleimhart Mantooso

    The second sentence shows Our Lord delegating a lot of authority. It is not unreasonable to infer that this includes the power to elect/appoint successors. YMMV

  209. @anonymous

    Mahomet was an insane jew-hating pedophile who had seizures and, as such, God would never chose as a prophet a man disposed to such evil.

    Now, explain to us how it is that Gabriel of the Annunciation is the name Gabriel claimed by Mahomet.

    • Troll: the grand wazoo
    • Replies: @Seraphim
  210. jsigur says:

    In actuality, the title should be “The Plot Against the Jews. Otherwise one would think the Jews are “America”
    On second thought, maybe the Jews, in their conceit, believe they are (((America)))

  211. anarchyst says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    Catholic power was neutralized with the changes made by the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”.
    Thankfully, there are those who have “pushed back” with considerable difficulty, one organization being SSPX.
    Vatican II was power grab by jews and protestants and was successful in “judaizing” ad “protestantizing” the Catholic Church.
    The greatest mistake was the absolution of the jews for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ, despite jews acknowledging their full and total responsibility for the act.

    • Agree: Patagonia Man
  212. @anarchyst

    Totally agree with that. With the death of Pius XII, the Vatican suffered a coup d’etat in 1958. Ever since, the Church has played traditional Catholics for idiots. Witness, for example, nothing but motherhood statements being said about the ongoing child sexual abuse scandals that daily diminish the Church’s reputation and weakens people’s strength of belief. This was also one of the reasons Benedict XVI resigned – he knew he was completely outnumbered by an entrenched power bloc.

    The CIA infiltrated the Church because its the last place anyone would think to look! We can witness that by, after the mysterious death of Pope John Paul I who died only 33 days after his election and a Polish Pope was elected in his place (Poland was a Warsaw Pact member at the time) to help bring down Soviet Central Industrialism (notice I say Central Industrialism, where production, exchange and distribution of products & services are decided centrally, as the USSR wasn’t truly communist).

    Flash forward to more recent times and before the US launched Operation Condor 2.0 to regain control over its South American vassals – lo and behold, a South American Pope was elected!

    Ever heard Francis speak out about:

    – the US infiltration and corruption of due process in removing Luiz ‘Lula’ da Silva from the Brazilian Presidency?
    – US sanctions against and frequent territorial incursions (using mercenaries) of Venezuela?
    – the use of sleeper agents e.g. Juan Guaidó, in South American parliaments & judiciaries to take over S. American nations from within?
    – the huge IMF bribe (called a loan) to Ecuador’s President Lenin Moreno to evict Julian Assange from its UK Embassy?
    – the far-right military coup in Bolivia last year?
    – the US now setting its sights again on Nicaragua, whose democratically-elected government defeated a violent right-wing coup attempt in 2018, etc, etc?

    Quite frankly, as one who seriously considered, and even prepared for, entering the seminary – the current state of the Church disgusts me. Truth begets justice – and justice begets peace.

    Peace on Earth.

    • Replies: @PTD
  213. Spot on Michael E. Hudson. Unfortunately, the Zionist jews have never ceased their drive towards world dominance. Today it seems they feel their time has come, and so they’re becoming bolder. The 3rd Temple is within sight, and after that all bets are off. Anti-Semitism is at historical lows, even as the jews say otherwise, while most incidents of it can be traced to jewish instigators/perpetrators.

  214. @Sparkon

    Jewish soft porn magazines. One good thing the National Democratic Socialict Party did is run the Jewish pimps, and perverts out of Berlin and Germany. They didn’t gas them, though they may as well have, as they have been blamed for it. 6 billion dead and counting. I hear the shekels clanging, I hear the cash drawer moan, rubbing my hands together make me cum cum cum.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  215. Seraphim says:
    @Mick Jagger gathers no mosque

    Their only answers to such quirky questions is calling you names. How dare you insult Mahomed?

  216. @anarchyst

    Yes to all that but the beginning of the end of Catholic Power was – as Jones argues in Slaughter of the cities – the breakup of Catholic ethnic communities thru anomic suburbanization promoted by the WASP – Jewish use of black proxy warriors from the South.

  217. Saggy says: • Website
    @Gleimhart Mantooso

    And no, you’re not moral. Only God is.

    Surprisingly, I think the opposite is true. God created perhaps the most diabolically evil world possible, populated by creatures that have to eat each other to survive.

    Man conceived of morality, not God. Man is trying to create a moral world, God didn’t.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Troll: Seraphim
  218. RSDB says:

    I hear Protestant converts occasionally say one of the more significant things that brought them into the Church was the question of where the authority of the Bible comes from, so it is an argument that convinces at least some people.

  219. ivan says:

    Roth is not one of the ranking Jewish American writers. He is nowhere when compared Norman Mailer, Stanley Elkin or Saul Bellow . The Roth phenomenon is just one more example of the manufacture of supposed geniuses by the experts in advertising that have taken over American culture in the past few decades.

  220. ivan says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    When the (((Russians))) are up to some dirty tricks they give themselves not just ordinary names – Bill, Jack, Dick – but Town and Country names – Borodin, Alexander Orlov, Harry Dexter White.

  221. ivan says:

    The site History for Atheists run again by Tim O’Neill who does not believe in Jesus’ Divinity is another goldmine of information in defence of the Catholic Church and Christianity generally :

    • Replies: @Anon
  222. @Saggy

    Apparently E. Michael Jones cannot post anything on Unz without the Catholic Church going on trial. I wish my identification with Christ were as strong.

    The real “horrific nonsense” in your post is the fashionable habit of thinking with your will instead of your intellect.

    Reason does not force evidence to fit one’s preferred conclusion, does it? That’s not particularly moral, is it?

    Let’s look at 1 Kings 15:3 and the prophet Samuel’s setting of King Saul the errand “to destroy Amelec and all his domains, granting no pardon, covering no plunder, but slaying man and woman, child and infant at the breast, camel and ass.”

    “What is going on here?” is a fair question; “What rot!” is a conclusion tantamount to shooting first then later asking questions.

    “…kill men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys.” This is a ritual phrase simply meaning “Kill everyone” and in this context, “kill everyone in the invading army”.

    What is condemned here is syncretism in what is called a “Hebraism”. Look it up.

    And then find it again in the New Testament where Jesus Christ, also speaking of sin, commands anyone whose eye causes him to sin to tear it out, etc…

    • Replies: @ivan
    , @Anon
    , @Saggy
  223. Let’s look at 1 Kings 15:3

    Waste of time (wrong book), though the mistake may illuminate.

    But Samuel said, “What then is this bleating of the sheep in my ears, and the lowing of the oxen which I hear?”

    That morsel puts the lie to your apologia.

    Then there’s this bit, straight to the blockheaded ears of innumerable dupes:

    And the Lord regretted that He had made Saul king over Israel.

    The Lord is a betrayed dumbass wearing a MIGA hat. Familiar.

    • Replies: @Felix Culpa
  224. Sparkon says:
    @the grand wazoo

    Jewish soft porn magazines.

    Yes, and the whole “Torturing Sex Nazi” thing in the ’50s and ’60s was an effective way of maintaining old Jewish hatreds and generating new ones with the younger set, as both were based on myths and lies. Now we can look at these sensationally lurid covers both as an unvarnished view into the Jewish perception of the world they were trying, and succeeding, to sell to America, and as a revealing exposé on how their slick but sinister methods are employed to pervert the innocent.

    By the way, the model’s name is Eva Lynd, not Lund, and that is artist Norm Eastman himself with the hacksaw in his cover illustration for the Sept. 1964 issue of Man’s Story that I posted above.

    In the interview, Eastman explained that, in the 1950s, he started out in the men’s adventure realm by providing artwork to magazines that were part of Martin Goodman’s Magazine Management empire, like For Men Only, Men and Male.

    Then, around 1960, Eastman began a long term relationship with the owners of the Reese and Emtee publishing companies, B. R. “Bud” Ampolsk and Maurice Rosenfield (spelled Rosenfeld by Hagenauer and some other sources). They were the publishers of some of the most outré men’s adventure magazines, such as Man’s Book, Man’s Epic, Man’s Story, Men Today, New Man and World of Men.

    Eastman told Hagenauer:

    “They both lived in a Jewish neighborhood in midtown Manhattan…Ampolsk was a very relaxed guy. Rosenfeld was also a nice guy. They gave me the feeling that you weren’t really doing these dirty little books.

    Ampolsk and I would meet over the covers and talk about what we were going to do. Over time, I made a whole list of torture methods. Starting with fire, water, stretching, ice, and electricity, we’d go through the list and come up with something that we hadn’t done before.

    Ampolsk once told me in all seriousness that we had never done anything that the Nazis hadn’t actually done. They were all detailed in files in Washington somewhere.I don’t know if he was fibbing to make me continue doing the covers or what, but it did make me feel a little better about doing them.

    I never saw the story before I illustrated it. Ampolsk was the idea man on the covers, so he looked after getting the stories written after we had settled on a cover image.”

    [my bold]

    Martin (born Moses) Goodman has a very interesting background. He is the founder of Marvel Comics, home of famous comic book artist Stan Lee, born Stanley Martin Lieber, but Moses, I mean, Martin Goodman was a busy man.

    Sex Health, 1942, Vol. 10

  225. ivan says:
    @Felix Culpa

    Yes much of it seems to be their manner of speaking. The “wiped out” Canaanites reappear again and again. It is a storytelling trope. Similar to when in a heated argument one or the party says that he hopes the other die. They don’t really mean it.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Felix Culpa
  226. anon[303] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Logical Meme

    The real ‘Plot Against America’ is this asinine series.

    I see the series as just another far-left lie to smear a great man, to create tension and divisiveness, while manufacturing a false history that will stick in the minds of most voters.

    We’re seeing more of these lately under color of anti-racism and pro-LBGT+, like ‘Hollywood’ on Netflix and how they twist material on Amazon. Not to mention things like giving the discredited 1619 project a Pulitzer.

    This stuff over-simplifies complex evolution. It also subtly dismisses the actual experiences of those minorities into a false narrative of ‘anti-capitalist struggle’ while whitewashing how many problems (slavery, Jim Crow) were originally championed by the socialist far-left.

    • Agree: anarchyst, Charon
  227. Seraphim says:
    @Gleimhart Mantooso

    Sorry, the ‘troll’ was destined to Saggy’s comment to yours.

  228. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:

    Yes much of it seems to be their manner of speaking. The “wiped out” Canaanites reappear again and again. It is a storytelling trope. Similar to when in a heated argument one or the party says that he hopes the other die. They don’t really mean it.

    What do you mean they don’t mean it?

    Jews live and die by the words of the Torah. That isn’t up for debate.

    They take it so seriously that they crafted two different sets of law and commentary on it and spend their entire lives studying them.


    They created entire secondary systems of gematria and kabbalah based on it.

    They spend their lives dressed in medieval clothing and tie fishing wire around miles of urban neighborhoods just so that they can turn on the toaster on Saturday.

    They sacrifice chickens in the street once per year because they believe that the Torah dictates that scapegoat sacrifices can remove sin.

    Every Saturday they avoid carrying coins in their pockets in the collective hope that they will one day destroy all other nations and rule the world. A hope that is open, mainstream Jewish “theology”.

    Of course they mean it.

    The Canaanites are not a “trope”. They are central to Jewish belief and political practice.

    As is the case for virtually all Torah mythology, the Canaanites are an allegory. A concept that is key to understanding how the Jewish religion works and what its aims and practices are.

    The Jews believe in circular, repeating time. Meaning that they hold themselves to be a people “out of time” or not subject to the ravages of time.

    This can be gleaned by their theological emphasis on Saturday as the ‘Sabbath”, or rest period represented by the mythological Golden Age (age frozen in a perfect time, also symbolized by Eden). Saturday is associated with the Greek-Roman God Cronus-Saturn who hate his children (the future) in order to preserve his throne and existence. I digress.

    What the above means, in terms of the Torah, is that the stories are meant to be timeless and circular in occurrence.

    Which further means that the Jews, at any point in history to include today, believe that they are acting out the stories in the Torah.

    A belief and practice that they display, outright, at virtually every Jewish holiday.

    The implication is that on any given day in the modern age, the modern Jews believe that they are fighting the Canaanites.

    All of the Torah mandates and rules (generally murder and dispossession) against the Canaanites apply to those who they frame as such today.

    Those who they frame as such are generally anyone inhabiting land that Jews covet.

    Unfortunately, this means that all of the world’s non-Jewish people fall within the Canaanite category today. Which is a belief that they do not encode (they state it outright) in the books that they do not translate into English, like the Zohar.

    I suggest a close reading of the Torah with the allegory-key to Jewish belief in mind. Its the only way to uncover for yourself what the Jews believe, in detail, and what their aims are.

    For the large group of Orthodox Jews who dictate Jewish religion and politics,, virtually everything in the Torah mythology applies to the modern world today.

    That’s the key to understanding the allegorical and true meaning of the Canaanites, to understanding the essentials of the Jewish religion, as well as from where it gets its modern instruction.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Felix Culpa
    , @ivan
  229. Robjil says:

    Yes, the Torah/Tanakh never ends. It is a living thing for our rulers. Wesley Clark mentioned the Seven nations to destroy theme for the nine eleven false flag. It is “noheg l’doros”, for all generations. The most barbaric events of the Torah/Tanakh are being recycled today with the US Golem being poked to go whatever way fits the Torah/Tanakh’s meanings.

    Since these seven nations no longer exist4 a person could think that this commandment is not noheg l’doros [for all generations5]. But only someone who does not understand the concept of noheg l’doros would think such a thing. A command that can be fulfilled without being limited to a certain time is considered noheg l’doros, because if the act would become possible in any generation, the mitzvah would apply. When G‑d will totally destroy the descendants of Amalek and remove them for all time — as will be speedily in our days, as G‑d (exalted be He) promised,6 “I will wipe out the memory of Amalek” — will we say that the mitzvah to wipe out the memory of Amalek7 was not noheg l’doros? This is not true, for in any generation when one finds a descendant of Amalek, he must be killed. The same applies to this mitzvah of killing all descendants of the seven nations, which is a milchemes mitzvah. In every generation we are required to uproot them and search after them down to the last individual. We did this until King David destroyed them completely, with the survivors being scattered and assimilated among the nations until they disappeared.

    This seven nations to destroy is the 187th mitzah, commandment, of the 613 mitzahs, commandments.

    The 187th mitzvah is that we are commanded to kill and destroy the seven nations [of Canaan]1 because they are the prime worshippers and original source of idolatry.
    The source of this commandment is G‑d’s statement2 (exalted be He), “You must wipe them out completely.” [Scripture3] explains the reason for this commandment is to keep us from learning from their heresy. Many verses encourage and urge that they be killed, and waging war against them is a milchemes mitzvah [mandatory war].

    What are these 613 mitzahs, commandments?

    Mitzvah literally means “commandment.” In fact, Jewish tradition understands exactly 613 mitzvot (plural of mitzvah) to be derived from the Hebrew Bible. The 613 are listed in Maimonides‘ Sefer Hamitzvot (Book of the Commandments), divided into “positive” (things one is required to do) and “negative” (things one may not do) commandments. To read them in Hebrew, click here. To read them in English, click here.

    We are dealing with a barbaric culture ruling us. Athenian debate would be a better cultural rallying point for humanity. Jerusalem revelation at the top of our pyramid is destroying our planet faster than any other thing one can image.

  230. @schnellandine

    “Wrong book”.

    No, it is not.

    As for your putatively damning quotes, what’s your point?

    • Replies: @schnellandine
  231. @Anon

    You are not disproving ivan’s point; you are illustrating the danger of getting the Old Testament’s meaning- and ignoring its fulfillment- wrong.

    • Agree: ivan
  232. @ivan

    True, both expressions have in common a non-literal meaning. However, “I hope you die” is a counterfeit of the Hebraism.

    Ironically and embarrassingly, “I hope you die” discloses intellectual impotence in its very attempt to project strength through mere emotional ranting.

    Saggy and Schnellandine’s posts are characterized by emotional ranting.

    The Hebraism, by starkest contrast, is a potently vivid and terse intensifier intended to drive home the point at issue. Another good example would be the Scriptures’ talk of God’s “hardening Pharaoh’s heart”. This is shorthand for “God is always in charge, no matter if the powerful thwart Him.”

    • Thanks: ivan
  233. @Felix Culpa

    “Wrong book”.

    No, it is not.

    Let’s check:

    And he walked in all the sins of his father, which he had done before him: and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as the heart of David his father.

    See if you can, without raving emotionally, tie that verse into Saul/Sam. Or admit wrong.

    As for your putatively damning quotes, what’s your point?

    Come back when you’re less emotional, and have explained why your nonstandard method of book naming supersedes.

    • Replies: @Felix Culpa
  234. Anon[145] • Disclaimer says:
    @Felix Culpa

    @ It seems Jones cannot post at Unz without the Catholic Church going on trial…
    Agree. Very boring. I also wish my identification with Christ was so very dogged!!

    But never mind Saggy. In the truths and teachings contained in the Bible “there are certain things difficult to understand, which the unlearned and the unstable distort, just as they do the rest of the Scriptures also, to their own destruction.” (2 Peter 3:16) People like Saggy are exactly why an authoritative teaching about the Bible is necessary, and should be done by the institution that:
    a) produced Scripture in the first place and
    b) is not limited to Scripture as sole source of revealed truth, especially since Tradition precedes Scripture itself.

    Evidently, within the long arc of the History of Salvation, in the interaction of Samuel and Saul regarding the extermination of the hated Amalekites, we are a long way from the Sermon of the Mount. We are within the confines of the “Old Law”, replaced by the New Convenant of Christ in the fullness of time.

    What is this part of Scripture teaching us? (One should at least try to understand the message. Whether we then believe is a matter of free will).


    Well, let me suggest a few points, aided by the Catholic Encyclopedia:
    – What offenses are punishable and in what degree? Offenses to God are always the worst. Deutoronomy 25 says the Amalakites had cruelly and treacherously attacked the Jews –intruders in their land, we must admit—when they had lost a battle and driven the whole people toward a swamp, in violation, it seems, of the ancient bedouin codes of hospitality and warfare. This violation of rules of war was an offense to God. The conflicto raged then from the time of Moses down to Saul, all through the years when the Israelis had become sedentary, and culminated in the final extermination of the Amalakites by the 10th successor of David.
    – What is the duty of a ruler to the commands of God? Samuel receives the task of killing the Amalekites as a special injunction, that was to be contrasted by his leniency towards the Quenites. And Israel was not to covet any of the animals (riches) of the Amalekites. But Saul keeps some of the animals to be sacrificed and takes the ruler Agag prisoner. So he is chastised by Samuel and thereupon loses God´s favor.

    Thomas Aquinas would delve long and deeply as to the justness of the Old Law. A relevant passage:
    I answer that, Man’s relations with foreigners are twofold: peaceful, and hostile: and in directing both kinds of relation the Law contained suitable precepts. For the Jews were offered three opportunities of peaceful relations with foreigners. First, when foreigners passed through their land as travelers. Secondly, when they came to dwell in their land as newcomers. And in both these respects the Law made kind provision in its precepts: for it is written (Exodus 22:21): “Thou shalt not molest a stranger [advenam]”; and again (Exodus 22:9): “Thou shalt not molest a stranger [peregrino].” Thirdly, when any foreigners wished to be admitted entirely to their fellowship and mode of worship. With regard to these a certain order was observed. For they were not at once admitted to citizenship: just as it was law with some nations that no one was deemed a citizen except after two or three generations, as the Philosopher says (Polit. iii, 1). The reason for this was that if foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst, many dangers might occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people. Hence it was that the Law prescribed in respect of certain nations that had close relations with the Jews (viz., the Egyptians among whom they were born and educated, and the Idumeans, the children of Esau, Jacob’s brother), that they should be admitted to the fellowship of the people after the third generation; whereas others (with whom their relations had been hostile, such as the Ammonites and Moabites) were never to be admitted to citizenship; while the Amalekites, who were yet more hostile to them, and had no fellowship of kindred with them, were to be held as foes in perpetuity: for it is written (Exodus 17:16): “The war of the Lord shall be against Amalec from generation to generation.”

    I also found a relevant sermon by gentle Newman about Saul:
    “The trial and the sin of the Israelites were continued to the end of their history. They fell from their election on Christ’s coming, in consequence of this very wilfulness; refusing to receive the terms of the New Covenant, as they were vouchsafed to them, and attempting to incorporate them into their own ceremonial system. “They being ignorant of God’s righteousness and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.”
    12. Such was one distinguishing sin of the Israelites as a nation; and, as it proved the cause of their rejection, so had it also, ages before, corrupted the faith, and forfeited the privileges, of their first king. The signs of wilfulness run through his history from first to last: but his formal trial took place at two distinct times, and in both cases terminated in his deliberate fall. Of these, the latter is more directly to our purpose. When sent to inflict a Divine judgment upon the Amalekites, he spared those whom he was bid slay; their king Agag, the best of the sheep and cattle, and all that was good. We are not concerned with the general state of mind and opinion which led him to this particular display of wilfulness. Much might be said of that profaneness, which, as in the case of Esau, was a distinguishing trait in his character. Indeed, we might even conjecture {164} that from the first he was an unbeliever in heart; that is, that he did not recognize the exclusive divinity of the Mosaic theology, compared with those of the surrounding nations, and that he had by this time learned to regard the pomp and splendour of the neighbouring monarchies with an interest which made him ashamed of the seeming illiberality and the singularity of the institutions of Israel.”

    • Replies: @Felix Culpa
  235. Anon[145] • Disclaimer says:

    Different anon, but thank you kindly. I still remember a nice comment by you in defense of Solzhenitsyn.

    • Thanks: ivan
  236. @schnellandine

    The First Book of Samuel, otherwise called the First Book of Kings, is what I quoted. Why? Because that’s how my Bible cites it.

    Clearly my remark about emotion driving your argument struck a nerve. More of the same won’t solve the problem. Neither your recourse to denial and projection.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @schnellandine
  237. Dumbo says:

    Well, the actual name of the novel and series should be “The Plot Against Jewmerica”. Then it would all make sense.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  238. @Felix Culpa

    Clearly my remark about emotion driving your argument struck a nerve.

    You’re exactly the putz I took you for. Okay, here goes:

    It’s clear my mocking your preschool argument tactic struck a nerve.

    “Struck a nerve”! Cannot that mewl be unholstered toward Richard Jewell after he mocks your charge that he planted bombs? Yes. That’s how valuable it is.

    Fly away.

  239. Anonymous[277] • Disclaimer says:

    The leading Jewish American groups have practiced anti-Christianism against Christian Armenians and the genocide committed against the latter by Turkey.

    Here is just one of many excerpts from the Jewish media which proves what I just said:

    Every year on April 24, the day that Armenians commemorate the killings, a resolution calling for the use of the controversial term is proposed in Congress and then beaten back. Some Jewish groups claim credit for ensuring that such a resolution never passes.

    Jewish advocacy groups, including the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, B’nai Brith and American Jewish Committee “have been working with the Turks on this issue” for more than 15 years, said Yola Habif Johnston, director for foundations and community outreach at Jinsa. “The Jewish lobby has quite actively supported Turkey in their efforts to prevent the so-called Armenian genocide resolution from passing,” she said.

    September 6, 2006
    Showdown Set in ‘Genocide’ Debate
    By Rebecca Spence
    Source: The Jewish Daily Forward

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @ivan
  240. @Anon

    Thanks for engaging and especially for the Newman quotation. The whole of it, mutatis mutandis, applies nicely, methinks, to those bishops who have canceled public access to the sacraments.

    When Newman says:

    “When sent to inflict a Divine judgment upon the Amalekites, he spared those whom he was bid slay..”

    I wholeheartedly take the point. I only wished to point out further that when “those” are enumerated, is it being expressed in a Hebraism, as Our Lord, Himself, was wont to use?

    The lesson is, then and now, that questioning God (“Did God really tell you not to eat the fruit of the tree?”) is to be given no quarter.

    • Replies: @Felix Culpa
  241. Robjil says:

    Yet the big 6 can’t be questioned.

    It is the new sun.

    Galileos are imprisoned or job-less for denying that the big 6 is the center of our fabricated Zion Universe.

    Bring back Athenian debates. End Jerusalem Revelation tyranny.

    Otherwise humanity will decline back to the chimpanzee level.

  242. @Felix Culpa

    I wrote “questioning God“ was verboten. Dangerously imprecise on my part. I meant to say questioning God’s commands, in any form is, as it were, out of the question.

  243. @Saggy

    Here is the reality – ‘Christianity, like Judaism and Islam, is a perfectly absurd religion that worships a god who as described in the Old Testament, particularly in Deuteronomy and Samuel, as a genocidal maniac who wants to and does destroy not only entire peoples, including women and children, but also their farm animals, “anything that breathes”. Fact check this.

    I have. I was an extreme atheist for the vast majority of my life. Nietzsche, Christopher Hitchens, Mark Twain (Letters to the Earth)—loved their work and still do in fact. Great writers and amazing people.

    Read the Origin of Species, cover to cover. Amazing stuff, even if it doesn’t ultimately explain how life got here.

    Hard science degree. Still value real science, in case it isn’t obvious.

    A proper answer would take a book length reply. I’d just point out that Christ radically transformed our understanding of God from what the Jews and the OT held. Remember “love your enemies?” Not exactly kill anything that moves.

    I know the so-called history of Christianity includes tons of barbarism. But Christ said people will know you are my disciples if you love one another. Not because you got baptized and go to church on occasion. Could be that people have a big problem with sin. I know the word “sin” grates on your ears like nails on a chalkboard. Perhaps the concept of evil rings a bell.

    I see you are relatively active in the comments. Hope to continue the conversation in the future.

    Best to you in this crazy frickin’ world!

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  244. Saggy says: • Website
    @Felix Culpa

    “…kill men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys.” This is a ritual phrase simply meaning “Kill everyone” and in this context, “kill everyone in the invading army”.

    What is condemned here is syncretism in what is called a “Hebraism”. Look it up.


  245. Seraphim says:

    Jews were commanded to “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18) also.
    Where is the difference with Jesus’ commands:
    “And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question to test him. “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets.” (Matthew 22:35-40)?

    • Replies: @Patagonia Man
    , @Anon
  246. EldnahYm says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    The Jews and the WASPs aligned to take down Catholic Power in the interest of war with Germany and the promotion of usurious capitalism.

    Frank Murphy, Leo Crowley, James Farley, and James Forrestal were all Irish Catholic members of FDR’s cabinet. In other words, you’re full of shit(much like E Michael Jones). Catholics overwhelmingly voted for Roosevelt.

  247. ivan says:

    I tend to agree that the religious Jews are caught in “circular time” where their enemies reappear again and again. Unlike the Christians or the Marxists who take the notion of a linear progression derived from Christianity; which finds its fulfillment at the End Times.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  248. Robjil says:

    Circular time is a good way to put it. The enemies of Jews from the Torah/Tanakh can reappear endlessly in time. No evolution is thought possible by believers of this circular time viewpoint of humanity.

    The recent controversy about a Martin Luther doll points this out. The doll holds up an Old Testament with the words “the End” on it. This is considered “anti-Semitic” by many Jews since the Torah/Tanakh has not “ended” for them. They live in a circular time like our rulers do. The “Seven nations to destroy” for the Middle East is Torah/Tanakh circular time at play on a giant scale on our planet.

    All was apparently going fine until Micha Brumlik, a retired Frankfurt University education professor and respected Jewish commentator, wrote last June that the popular toy was “anti-Jewish, if not even anti-Semitic.”

    The problem, he said, was the inscription on the open pages of the Bible that the Playmobil Luther holds. On the left is written in German: “Books of the Old Testament. END.” The right page says: “The New Testament, translated by Doctor Martin Luther.”

    Why was the word “END” written so prominently, Brumlik asked. “Theologically, there can be no other reason than that the ‘Old Testament’ and its validity should be seen as ended and superseded,” he wrote in the Berlin newspaper tageszeitung.

    • Thanks: schnellandine
    • Replies: @ivan
  249. @Seraphim

    I’m not a biblical scholar, but AFAIK, followers of Jesus the Prophet (who some call Christ) who became known as Christians were also taught to:
    • “love thine enemy”
    • “turn the other cheek”
    • “if asked for your cloak, give your coat also”
    • “if asked to walk one mile, walk two miles”
    • “give to everyone who asks you”, etc
    in addition to “love your neighbor as yourself”.

    In other words, its a higher benchmark to be lived.

    With the exception of Hasidic Jews who are taught similar adages w.r.t family members, e.g., fathers complaining about their sons are advised by their rabbi to “Love him more”, I’m not aware that there’s any OT passages exhorting the same standard as the Jesus teachings, who came “not to abolish the law, but to fulfill it.”

    But I’m happy to be corrected by readers of this site.


    • Replies: @Anon
    , @FactChecker
  250. Anon[312] • Disclaimer says:
    @Patagonia Man

    Do not forget the plea of a man dying tortured “Father, forgive them; they know not what they do.”

    Does your “peace” means you are Muslim?

    • Replies: @Patagonia Man
  251. Hibernian says:

    Catholics are to people like Roosevelt what Hessian mercenaries were to George III – tools.

  252. @EldnahYm

    Being relatively poor , Catholics tended Democrat as voters and party members and overwhelmingly voted for the Roosevelt of the New Deal, not the Roosevelt of the coming Jew and WASP driven unnecessary war Forrestal was wisely against support of Israel and probably murdered for it though his death was called suicide. Are you full of JEW or WASP? E Michael Jones nails them both. I’ll guess from your name your Jewish. Looking forward to war with Iran if Trump gets elected? Watch out. Could be one war too many. The goyem are waking up. That is why you hate EMichael Jones, isn’t it?

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    , @anon
  253. @Anon

    @Anon[312] Good point.

    And no I’m not. I use ‘Peace’ or ‘Cheers’ as a valediction, i.e, an utterance made in bidding farewell.


  254. @Patagonia Man

    Agreed that Christ calls us to a higher standard of love than the OT requires.

    Also, I’m not aware of Christ suggesting killing or violence as a solution to problems, regardless of what some so-called followers later did down the centuries. Again, a clear distinction with the OT.

    Btw, I’m just getting started on following Christ so I surely don’t want to put myself forth as some kind of great example.

    I’m currently reading a book which explains how his “yoke is light” and his “burden is easy.” Hard to reconcile that with turn the other cheek, etc.

    Beyond the question of interpretation (is it literal or hyperbolic to get the idea across or whatever other possibilities there are), it is not something someone just does because one wants to imitate one’s “hero.” It only becomes easy through a life of dedicated practice — in the same way top athletes make amazing performance on the field look easy. It is the result of a life of discipline, a life of discipleship.

    The practice “exercises” include things like solitude, fasting and prayer (eg, Jesus goes to the desert for 40 days before he begins his public ministry).

    Best to you!

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    , @Patagonia Man
  255. Since EMJ likes to scribble and babble about Joooooish movies, it is time to analyze and criticize one of his youtubes.

    Here is a melodrama written by and starring EMJ and a schwartze tuchas:

    At the 10 minute mark he babbles that God destined this encounter to happen. If he believes God has plans for him to be with negroids, when blacks get their own state, EMJ will have to live in it. If EMJ was not married, this destined meeting would have blossomed into a love affair – a variation of Dante and Beatrice. EMJ’s fluency in Ebonics would make for interesting love poetry.

    Watching this bizarre film made me think about God’s plan for me. God’s plan for me is to expose demented, groid-loving, anti-Semites who are doing nothing to save the West – i.e., EMJ. EMJ refuses to deal with the realities of IQ/race/ethnicity. He is like a Hindu who believes that biological realities are maya, illusion. He believes the new homo/groid/gloid RCC is the only way to save the West. Of course, he is wrong. Separation is the wave of the future.

  256. Hibernian says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    Additionally Crowley was not Cabinet level.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  257. anon[361] • Disclaimer says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    I’ll guess from your name your Jewish.


    mY handlE

    @ Attila the peabrain

    Of course, he is wrong. Separation is the wave of the future.

    please separate yourself from the rest of society, “social distance X 100000

  258. Seraphim says:

    I will suggest that if you want to have a correct interpretation of Christ’s words, deeds and commands, you should ask the keepers and transmitters of the Tradition (doctrine and practices), the priests and theologians of the Orthodox Church.

    • Replies: @FactChecker
  259. ivan says:

    The bloody Jewish Lobby is not above belittling the suffering of others to protect the State of Israel. As noted the lobby prevented the recognition of the Armenian Genocide as a “genocide” in order to favour Turkey, then a closer ally of Israel than it is now.

    They have the chutzpah now to threaten Erdoghan Pasha with the reverse if turns even more unfriendly towards Israel.

  260. ivan says:

    The funny thing is what the respected Dr Brumlik calls “anti-Jewish, if not even anti-Semitic”, is what all Christians believe : That Jesus in the NT has fulfilled all that was valuable in the OT. So he is caught in a dilemma : are Christians “anti-semitic” by definition?

    • Replies: @Tlotsi
  261. @FactChecker

    Yes, you’re quite right Fact Checker, its not something we do to emulate our hero – its something we do to have the experience He had and wanted to share with others.

    I’m a bit reluctant to make suggestions, although from my own experience I found The Imitation of Christ by Thomas à Kempis and the Irish-American Joseph Campbell’s The Power of Myth interviews (on DVD) which is useful as a framework as you go forward – to be invaluable.

    As I understand it, the passage “my yoke is light” is referring to living the contemplative life which can be done formally in monasteries (e.g., the Carmelites or any of the contemplative orders of the Church), or less formally by doing Work On Organic Farms, (WOOFing) and living in a tent, if you want to really ‘milk’ it. There’s many such hobby farms in the US & other agricultural countries that host WOOFers – where each day you work for a few hours for your meals & accommodation and the rest of the day is free time for reading and contemplating/reflecting upon the meaning of what you’ve read. That’s the way I did it.

    Critical to our success is our intention and an attitude of self surrender (i.e., not trying to make things happen – which is the real test, hehe, but just allowing ourselves to be shown the way).

    Btw, there’s nothing mysterious about this process: it’s simply bringing the passage: “ask and ye shall receive, seek and ye shall find, knock and it will be opened unto you”, into our daily lives.

    This can be an incredibly exciting time of your life if you give yourself the freedom and just allow yourself to experience. If you follow the connections (or what Carl Jung called ’synchronicity’, i.e., there are no coincidences) you may well be truly amazed where you end up (and I’m not referring to a geographical location, hehe).

    Peace be with you.

  262. @Seraphim

    Seraphim, we are on the same page. I’ve looked into Roman Catholicism, various forms of Protestantism and Eastern Orthodoxy and I’m about 99% likely to end up Orthodox. This whole covid lockdown thing has infringed on my ability to pursue this path through church at the moment but maybe I’m supposed to spend 40 days in the desert, lol.

    I’m reading the Orthodox Study Bible and have a bunch of other books. I suppose I could reach out to several churches by phone and see if there is anything I could do that way until the covid insanity lifts.

    Do you have any suggestions?

    Btw, will be reading The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church by Lossky soon.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Seraphim
  263. Anon[859] • Disclaimer says:

    Perhaps I would do a fast -to-cover reading of a Cathechism of a high-school level. Lavoire Morrow “My Catholic Faith” comes to mind. Then a dive into deeper waters, but having on have on hand a Trent Cathechism. It is extremely helpful.

    The Faith can be summed up in three words: Revelation, Incarnation, Communion. One needs the edifice of sacramental life, as you know.

    To render unto God what is God’s, you need an institution with a principle of a unity (Peter) beyond local governments and geographical churches. Once compromised, those have little hope of renewal.

    To be Catholic today, you need humility and fortitude and faith. Yet it is the only church He founded. However unfashionable, however black-legended, only to Peter did He say three times: take care of my sheep.

    Here’s the road of a man with will and energy:

    • Replies: @FactChecker
    , @attilathehen
  264. Seraphim says:

    You are on the right you have the right attitude. Baptism was preceded by a long period of ‘catechumenate’, a period of instruction in the faith before baptism and admission of converts to the Church.
    You may use with great profit the site It contains the translations of all Greek Scriptures, Patristic commentaries.
    Also the site ‘Mystagogy’
    But also pray that God enlighten your mind and open your heart to understand what you read.
    God help.

    • Replies: @FactChecker
  265. @Anon

    Thanks Anon,
    Great video, great message.

  266. @Seraphim

    Thanks Seraphim, especially for the ellopos site. I feel pulled to learn Greek but I’m not sure if it is just my insatiable desire to learn or something more important.

    “As one who has not bought into the conventional wisdom concerning ‘recovery of the lost text,’ I find it refreshing that the Eastern Church has available a Greek text which, while probably not perfect, is as close as we may come to the original today. Instead of one determined by a vote of 5 or 6 scholars, this text is the one commonly received by the Greek and Russian churches from time immemorial. As a Protestant Christian I delight in honoring my Orthodox friends who have preserved this text when the entire western church had defaulted to a translation, Jerome’s Latin Vulgate, and now has widely accepted theories which do not accord with the historical record we have. For instance, a recent Greek edition in the west is done with the overt assumption that changes in the ancient text were done by men of good will, when the fathers repeatedly have written that there were intentional corruptions which had crept in as early as the first few centuries. I trust Christians in the Nicene age to be better judges of the original than Americans in the twentieth century. Thomas E. Martin

    This seems obviously right. I agree that innovation in the faith is wrong on principle and appreciate the Apostolic Fathers commitment to the received tradition.

    There has been a lot of subversion aimed at the Church over the millennia. Stick to the original, or as close as you can get.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  267. Seraphim says:

    Always happy to be of help to like minded people. I am happy that they still exist around.
    God help.

  268. Jimmy1969 says:

    Interesting that with 500 plus TV and Cable channels …we do not have one single right wing channel that lets commentators like the ones on Unz and similar sites make their case. The documentaries on every history channel are pro Zionist propaganda pieces and American glorification stories for grade 9 want to be soldiers. Main stream news sites as well: there is a whole category of people they exclude from coming on to their shows. It is amazing that these Journalists spend their whole waking day complaining about manipulation and uncovering hidden truths and digging for the story behind the scenes etc…but they will only allow one narrative and exclude anything else. Anyone they do not like or do not want to hear from is “a hater”.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  269. @Jimmy1969

    Yes, we have been raised with a history which is actually Jewstory. If our media, educational and entertainment institutions have done their job, our consciousness is Jewish or more precisely a consciousnesses for goyim of which the Jews approve. For example the theory that race and ethnicity are only skin deep. Show me a Jew who really believes that and you have shown me a self alienated Jew, But meanwhile you cannot graduate or even get into a college or University unless you at least pretend to believe such rubbish. As a boomer who grew up with post war Semophilia, I did not need to pretend. I will now spend the rest of my life trying to de-Semophile. It isn’t easy. With boomers semophilia is almost like instinct. But I see by your pseudonym, you probably know what I mean

    • Agree: Robjil
  270. @Emslander

    The final location of Peter’s tomb, if the skeleton inside it is Peter’s which can’t be verified, might tell us Peter was in Italy when an emperor fiddled while Rome burned, and his remains were collected after Nero’s death, but so what?

    But okay. History supports what? Refer us to specific works of credible historians. I have Eusebius’ History here. Where in it should I look? Contemporaneous records of credible authors? Which? What fact or relevant facts did they witness?

    You’ve so far said nothing. Try to do better.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  271. @Hibernian

    Hibernian, thanks for that link. Very interesting. I won’t just read #4 but the whole lot, and more about James Likoudi. So it will be quite a while before I can comment on his article or respond to you. But when a crank gives the specific details of his crankiness, it’s fun!

    I’d like to return the favour by transcribing here in full “CHAP. XXV. — Of the Church” from the 1643 Westminster Confession of Faith, but I’m stuck on a little phone for the present, so it will have to wait.

  272. @Anon

    This priest is a perfect example of a Western male who has no clue about reality. He has a Wiki page where it details what happened to him in Burma. He wasted a part of his life on low IQ Mongoloids (average IQ 83). I will give the Burmese credit for expelling the Rohingya Muslims from their country. I wonder what the priest thinks about this “evil.”

    Besides philosophy and physics, he should have studied biology first. Biology must be the first thing studied. Human biology, i.e., IQ/racial/ethnic differences are the foundation for knowing what kind of people can produce literate, functioning societies and countries. The Caucasoid race with its different ethnicities is number one. The only intelligent Mongoloids are the Japanese. Negroids are last in IQ.

    I understand his attempt to try to understand good and evil but his conclusion is partially wrong. The best religion on earth is Christianity, but it does not work for everyone, i.e., Mongoloids and Negroids. If these races want to be Christian, they must have their own churches.

    All we need to do is look at Roman Catholic Latin America. Latin America is heterogeneous so where there are Caucasian/European nations you will see civilization. However, 55% black Brazil has one of the highest murder rates in the world. Amerindian El Salvador (note the name) also has one of the highest murders rates in the world. Catholic black Haiti is a voodoo shithole. Shinto/Buddhist Japan is a first world country.

    Here is an article where the author scribbles about the lack of development in Latin America, but refuses to deal with IQ/ethnicity/race.

    Biology is first, beliefs are second.

  273. @PeterMX

    “You’re kind of dopey.”

    Really, you are too kind.

  274. anonymous[296] • Disclaimer says:

    But, but . . . Philp Roth has no Jewish blood. He’s a Khazar.

    By the way, what has happened to all the Kazar comments here and across the net? Has the roaming death cult taken matters into hand?

  275. marden says:

    Don’t forget the Khazar Fed murdered the Lindbergh baby, Charles grandson.

  276. Anon[186] • Disclaimer says:

    Thank you Mr Jones, for the very first time I understand why the Jews were such staunch supporters of the communist African National Congress. It was not only to enrich themselves but to tear down the Christian Calvinistic National Party which was in government at the time. Their hatred for Christianity has led to, about (accurate figures from the current regime are not forthcoming) 20,000 murders per annum, of which white South Africans make up an inordinate proportion

  277. Tlotsi says:

    Jews are anti-Christian by definition, but that doesn’t seem to matter.

    • Agree: WhiteWinger
    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  278. wildbeard says:

    Jewish hegemony and their pathological aversion to criticism and recognition of their power has turned the United States into a corrupt, dysfunctional, and chaotic Orwellian state.

  279. @Tlotsi

    I am a skeptic but as I read the NT, Christ was a jew who didn’t trust or like Judaism and the Jewish hierarchy. He was a “self hating Jew” as the contemporary Jews might have it That is why Jews hated him and killed him. I do think Christians have forgotten Christ

  280. PTD says:

    E Michael Jones knows that Galileo was wrong. The world is, has always been, and will be geocentric. That is the obvious bible literal meaning. He even renounced his theories before he died. There is no proof for heliocentrism that cannot equally be applied to geocentrism. It has been the unanimous teachings of the Fathers of the Church, it was upheld by popes and theologians for 1800 years; even today the Church has not rescinded its pronouncement that heliocentrism is heretical, despite Cardinal Ratzinger saying that it was the foremost reason for the Vatican II Council – the worst that has ever been.

    I believe that Jones is working his critical essays in the direction of the so-called Shoah. There obviously was a holocaust of in the region of 350,000 Jews, as well as many others. He has to tread carefully when he is such an outspoken critic of the revolutionary Jew. There are others who have trod the 6 million path who have studied a lifetime at it. He has defended Bishop Williamson for being thrown to the wolves by the Church for questioning the narrative: after all Williamson didn’t deny any dogma or teaching of the Church, just the “sin” of holocaustianity.

  281. PTD says:
    @Gleimhart Mantooso

    Notice how Christ uses “thee”, “thou” which are second person singular expressions meaning He is speaking to Peter personally. The disciples were in attendance to understand the signification. He then goes on to talk about the future of the papacy and His church. Seems as if the papists got it right

  282. PTD says:
    @Patagonia Man

    The heresy of Modernism was condemned by Pope Pius XII, and the Oath against Modernism was introduced which all subsequent popes signed. Pope Paul VI, the Freemason and homosexual, removed it. It is true to say that there was a Jewish/American coup that led to the temporary reign of John XXIII, because the man they wanted on the throne was Montini (Paul VI). He it was who allowed Modernism to thrive again at the disastrous Second Vatican Council and the introduction of the Novus Ordo missal. Satan succeeded in sitting on the throne of Peter. The homosexual freemasonic lavender mafia consolidated its gains in the curia and governance of the Church.

    There is something to be said about the divine institution of the office of the papacy conferred on Peter and his successors; it is divinely protected (as is the Church). It has been the object to seize and control for centuries. It doesn’t mean that all popes are angels or saints, far from it, Peter himself was a sinful and unworthy man; and yet he was chosen to be the first pope. It is said that Pius IX was a freemason, but he turned out to be a devout traditional pope. Yet to be beatified. With Paul VI the freemasons had much greater success, but the faith of Peter in Paul VI was preserved. John Paul I was definitely assassinated by high up cardinals in the curia as he was about to remove important people from the corrupt Vatican Bank. John Paul II may very well have been promoted by factions in and out of the Church. Yet he created a new code of canon law, and in it he created canon 332,2: should the pontiff resign the papacy. Why did he do it? There had been no resignations for over 700 years. This was the work of the Holy Ghost. Fast forward to 2013 and Pope Benedict XVI’s “resignation”. When Ratzinger was elected in 2005, it has subsequently been revealed that Bergoglio was the runner up. A new faction which had coalesced around the umbrella name of the St Galen Mafia had promoted him. Notice how Benedict said at his inaugural Mass, Pray for me that I do not flee for fear of the wolves. And yet many interpreted that he did exactly that when he retired.

    In that fevered time of the “resignation” many people were amazed, progressives were excited and the traditionalists felt disowned and rejected by this act. What people started to notice is that Benedict failed to fulfil the precepts of the canon 332,2: he didn’t resign/renounce the “munus” which he was expressly meant to do, but the “ministerio”. He failed to carry out the precepts of the canon, hence his declaration was/is null and void. The cardinals and curia ran ahead with it , and they failed to do due diligence and check if the law was fulfilled. Benedict sold them a pup and they ran with it. Why? Because he was under extreme pressure to resign (some say because he was given an ultimatum to go by the St Galen Mafia after 5 years in office. He didn’t. He refused. So even a resignation under extreme duress is null and void. Now assassination was highly likely, given the recent history. How was he to preserve the papacy from these evil men, and yet preserve his life? So he devised a scenario where people would erroneously believe he had resigned, including everyone in the curia and the press, so that Bergoglio could ascend the throne, but not as the Pope but as an antipope, which is exactly what he is. Benedict never renounced, or resigned the papacy, he is still the pope; he didn’t flee from fear of the wolves as he is still there in the Vatican surrounded by them. He is called Holy Father and still wears white and the papal ring. Every thing that Bergoglio has done and will do is null and void. The conclave that elected him was invalid. This frightening scenario is still unfolding before our ours. St Katherine Emerinch’s prophecy of two popes is playing out in real time. The puss that is the world of ecclesiastical freemasonry and the homo-globo filth is evident for all to see. “Francis” has no protection of the office, hence his apostasy and hatred of the Catholic Church is there for all to see. He is the False Prophet of the Apocalypse. The bishops and cardinals who accept him as pope are in schism from the true pope. This deeply compromised figure of Ratzinger who was responsible for much of what went on at Vatican II, who was suspected of heresy, and yet a brilliant mind, was employed by the office to preserve Peter. The machinations at work are real and far more machiavellian than a Dan Brown Novel.

    • Replies: @Patagonia Man
  283. Anon[157] • Disclaimer says:

    Jews were commanded to “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18) also.
    Where is the difference with Jesus’ commands:

    The difference lies is the factual meaning of the translated word “neighbor”, as defined by Judaism.

    In Judaism, “neighbor” only refers to other members of Israel as Judaism defines it (only Jews).

    This is one of countless examples, and one common mechanism, of misinterpretation of the Old Testament.

    Judaism depends on such misinterpretation for political cover.

    Parallel to this original Old Testament meaning, it is also be a common Christian misinterpretation that Christ’s reference to such words means anything beyond “love other Christians / Israel”.

    Christ was severe with non-Israelis (different from today’s variety) even when they came to him for help.

    Though, he would reluctantly agree to help them upon a deep expression of faith.

    This is a major difference between Judaism and Christianity: Judaism effectively accepts no converts and as such is a 100% racial religion that doesn’t even require belief in its tenets for membership; it only requires birth. Black Jews and converts are essentially held to be fake Jews by the Orthodox. See the Mishnaic Scale of Lineages and the associated Rabbinical commentary for proof.

    Christianity is implied to be strict with racial membership in Israel, except upon true expressions of faith. Which is obviously a large exception.

    In that, Christianity is meant to take us toward the apocalypse (seen as desirable) via its facilitation of cultural imperialism and possibly Christianity’s vulnerability to cultural and political corruption toward communist social values, for example, under the encouraged false interpretation of the “love thy neighbor” edict.

    The original requirements of Christianity should still be held to stand: racial membership in Israel (which can be defined contra the true definition of “Canaanite”) or a deep, true expression of faith and the accompanying Christian behavior. It can be argued that no one else is a “neighbor”.

    For Christ, it is unlikely that “neighbor” ever meant anything other than Christians / Israelis.

    “Israel” has an implied racial connotation, according to the below NT passage. To complete the coded message, you should also figure out what type of people “Canaanite” specifically referred to in the time of Christ. There are older, non Jewish and non-Christian sources that explain it. You might start with the Mandaein Ginza Rba’s commentary on highland vs lowland dwellers, cross referenced with the etymology of Aram and common commentary on it.

    Matthew 15:21-28

    21 Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. 22 A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to Him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession.”

    23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to Him and urged Him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.” 24 He answered, “I was only sent to the lost sheep of Israel.”

    25 The woman came and knelt before Him. “Lord, help me!” she said. 26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to their dogs.” 27 “Yes, Lord,” she said, “but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”

    27 Then Jesus answered, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed from that very hour.

  284. @PTD

    Thankyou PTD for your very well informed reply.


  285. lydia says:

    Horrible footage streamed live earlier when forces in Iraq started shooting live ammunition at the protesters. #IraqProtest #Iraqprotest

    Protesting against Iran control of Iraqi government. strange new to me Iranian/Iraqi conflict at present

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All E. Michael Jones Comments via RSS
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2