The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewE. Michael Jones Archive
Are the White Boys Willing to Die in Defense of the Gay Disco?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

As if determined to lend credence those who claim he is suffering from dementia, President Biden logged on to his Twitter account and opined:

Putin has the gall to claim that he is de-Nazifying Ukraine. This lie isn’t just cynical; it’s obscene. President Zelensky was democratically elected. He is Jewish; his father’s family was wiped out in the Nazi Holocaust.[1]https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1507838900554842115

Biden is giving expression to what could be called the a priori school of foreign policy, according to which he can deduce a statement about reality from abstract principles. So, there can be no Nazis in Ukraine because its president is Jewish. Another member of this school of foreign policy is Catholic neocon pundit George Weigel, who said much the same thing, dismissing any references to actual Nazis in Ukrainian army units like the Azov Brigade as chimeras evoked by conspiracy theories. One of the most puzzling features of the current war in the Ukraine is the alliance between Jews and Nazis which makes up its current government. When Weigel was confronted with this fact, he dismissed it as an inherently impossible piece of “prevarication,” just as President Biden, who is normally on the other side of the political spectrum, had done:

Ukraine is a country with a democratically elected president of Jewish heritage whose first language was Russian. To say, as Putin did, that this man and the government he leads require “denazification” set a new low for Kremlin prevarication.[2]https://eppc.org/publication/ukraine-russia-and-the-...eigel/

As if to outdo his Jewish mentors Max Boot and Bill Kristol, who have also called for military intervention in Ukraine and regime change in Russia, Weigel thumps his chest in an even more bellicose manner, demanding that the Biden administration “pour western aid into Ukraine. . . including anti-tank and anti-aircraft weaponry,”[3]https://eppc.org/publication/ukraine-russia-and-the-...weigel insuring that innocent people will die in a futile attempt to stop a Russian invasion which has already decapitated the Ukrainian military. Like his Jewish mentors, Weigel makes these demands from the safe confines of his desk at his own Washington think tank, the Ethics and Public Policy Center. In making these claims, Weigel must surely know that President Zelensky has called for volunteers to take up their AK-47s and defend the gay disco known as Ukraine, but as of this writing neither Weigel, nor Boot, nor Kristol have announced plans to fly to Kiev.

But let’s be fair here. Weigel, Boot, and Kristol may not be simply despicable cowards who want the goyim to die for their agenda; they may be despicable cowards who are genuinely confused, because the situation is certainly confusing. Why would Jews ally themselves with Nazis? The statement seems a priori preposterous. It’s every bit as absurd as claiming that the were 13 bioweapons labs in Ukraine, a claim that was soundly denounced by the fact checkers, until Victoria Nuland made the same claim in testimony before the US Senate, because unlike the fact checkers who are paid to lie, Nuland is paid to lie unless she is testifying under oath. Where are the fact checkers when we need them to dispute the obviously false claim that Jews would ever lower themselves to work with Nazis? Well, we’re still waiting, and we’re not holding our breath because it isn’t going to happen. Reality has intervened canceling another category of the mind whose shelf life as propaganda just expired.

The first crack in this dam occurred when Facebook changed its hate speech policy. The same platform which banned Nazis from spreading their hate now allowed its followers to praise Nazis, as long as those Nazis were spreading their hate while fighting under Ukraine’s Jewish president. The same is true of death threats, which are now definitely okay as long as Washington chest thumpers like Lindsey Graham call for the death of Vladimir Putin, as Graham did on his Twitter account with impunity.

Before long, however, the same mainstream media which could no longer deny reality decided instead to spin what they could no longer deny. And so we read in the Washington Post that Nazis “have been recruited by groups like the Azov Battalion, a far-right nationalist Ukrainian paramilitary and political movement.” The Post then went on to tell us that the Nazi Azov Brigade “was absorbed into the Ukrainian national guard in 2014 and has been a basis for Putin’s false claim that Ukraine’s government is run by neo-Nazis.”

Wait a minute, no one, least of all Vladimir Putin, is claiming that “Ukraine’s government is run by neo-Nazis.” The claim is that the Jews who run the government have incorporated Nazi brigades into their military, which is what the Post just admitted in its article. So why is this a false claim? Is it false because the Post deliberately misstated what is really going on? The Post goes on to say that “Though Azov remains a fringe movement in Ukraine, it is a larger-than-life brand among many extremists. It has openly welcomed Westerners into its ranks via white-supremacist sites. Azov stickers and patches have been seen around the globe. . . .”

Then things get really confusing:

because Western white supremacists and neo-Nazis, for the most part, do not support the current Ukrainian government — and not simply because of its ban on antisemitism, President Volodymyr Zelensky’s Jewish heritage or other specific matters. Ukraine is a developing democracy, which far-right extremists oppose as contrary to the fascist governments they want to see. As the administrator of a popular German and English neo-Nazi chat group wrote while urging members to join Azov, “I am not defending Ukraine, I am defending National Socialism.”

At this point the ADL got involved, but the organization which has been demonizing critics of Jewish behavior as anti-Semites and neo-Nazis only succeeded in muddying the waters even more. On 4 March, the Anti-Defamation League published an article by Andrew Srulevitch, its director of European affairs, in an attempt to defuse the increasingly embarrassing Nazi problem in Ukraine. On March 15 ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt republished the article in an attempt to explain how “anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and other misinformation” linking Zelensky and the neo-Nazi Azov Brigade are “spreading in the wake of the invasion.”

ORDER IT NOW

In order to downplay the present-day cult of Stefan Bandera and support for Nazism in Ukraine, the ADL finds it necessary to rewrite some history and in doing so ends up promoting Holocaust denial. Srulevitch’s article takes the form of a Q&A with David Fishman, a professor of Jewish History at the Jewish Theological Seminary who is also a member of the academic committee of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

“We’ve seen torchlit marches in the middle of [Kiev] with the red and black flags of UPA … and pictures of Stepan Bandera, who allied with the Nazis during WWII,” Srulevitch asks. “Isn’t that evidence of Nazism in Ukraine?”

“For Ukrainian nationalists, UPA and Bandera are symbols of the Ukrainian fight for Ukrainian independence. The UPA allied with Nazi Germany against the Soviet Union for tactical – not ideological – reasons,” Fishman responds.

So, Nazis are okay now with the ADL? No, that would be too simple and too close to admitting the current situation in Ukraine contradicts everything that the ADL claims to stand for. So, according to Fishman’s reading, “allying with the Nazis” is still “unforgivable under any circumstance” because “historians have documented that Ukrainian nationalists participated together with Germans in the murder of many thousands of Jews in Ukraine,” according to Fishman.[4]https://electronicintifada.net/content/israel-lobby-.../35021

Okay, that means we have to condemn the Zalensky government then, right? Well, no, that’s not the ADL position either because the same Azov Brigade which descended from “Ukrainian nationalists” who “participated together with Germans in the murder of many thousands of Jews in Ukraine” and sport swastikas on their helmets are not really Nazis because they “allied with Nazi Germany against the Soviet Union for tactical – not ideological – reasons.” So just to contextualize this, the Canadian truckers who were protesting COVID restrictions are Nazis because “Honk Honk equals Heil Hitler,” as one Jewish member of Parliament said, but the people who openly identify with Nazism and its goals are not because they are working with Jews, who have Jewish privilege, which allows them to make truth the opinion of those who control the media through organizations like the ADL.

Got that? No? Well, don’t feel bad. I don’t get it either. Full of perplexity, I was relieved to get an invitation to take part in a debate over the Ukrainian situation sponsored by the Scandza Foundation. Surely, we could get to the bottom of this in free and open debate. Because Frodi Mitjord, Scandza’s founder, was having trouble narrowing the topic, I proposed my own: “White Nationalists should come to the aid of the Jews and Nazis who are using the Ukrainian people to advance NATO’s agenda against Russia.” For some reason Frodi modified my wording to “Nationalists should support the Ukraine.” Why this reticence to talk about whiteness on of all places the Scandza Forum, the ultimate white guy operation? As the day of the debate neared, the topic got neutered back to simply a debate on the Ukraine, until I insisted that the original topic be restored, which it was not.

Greg Johnson, my opponent in the debate, seemed equally reluctant to use the word white, forcing me to bring the discussion back to reality by citing something apropos which he had already written. White Nationalism, according to Mr. Johnson:

should be a one-issue political outlook. White Nationalism is for the interests of Whites and against the interests of our racial enemies. Period. Anything else is beside the point. That means that White Nationalists must work to unite all Whites into a self-conscious racial community, rallying around our common racial interests. White Nationalism has only one message for homosexuals: White homosexuals have more important interests in common with other Whites than they do with non-White homosexuals. We have to resist falling for any form of the divide and conquer strategy used by our enemies to destroy our solidarity as a prelude to destroying our race. Battles between gays and straights, men and women, pagans and Christians, Nordics and Mediterraneans, Celts and WASPs, Germans and Slavs, etc. have no place in the White Nationalist movement. These will always be used by our enemies to divide and subvert us.[5]http://www.westsdarkesthour.com/2012/02/28/greg-joh...ality/

During the debate, I asked Mr. Johnson why he supports pitting Slavs against Slavs when he is against pitting Germans against Slavs. If race is the fundamental issue in this conflict, could he please tell us if the Ukrainians are white or if the Russians are white. I never got an answer to this question, for reasons I will discuss later, because this passage isn’t about race, it’s about homosexuality and Johnson’s attempt to make homosexuality an acceptable part of the white nationalist movement. At this point, I started to understand that this conversation wasn’t really about race. During the debate, my mug and my bowtie were clearly visible in a way that Johnson’s face and whatever he was wearing were not. Instead of a live video, Johnson put up an icon of Janus with his two faces facing in opposite directions, also reminiscent of the symbol of Epimetheus and Prometheus, but even more indicative the two-faced nature of the man I was supposed to be debating.

The infallible sign that you’re dealing with a commissar arrives when the representative of the movement—be it conservatism or white nationalism—announces that it’s time to broaden the movement to include homosexuals. This is what Charlie Kirk did a few years back for conservatism; Greg Johnson did the same thing for white nationalism. The commissar in question could be doing this for personal reasons, or he could be doing it for money. Kirk is a Kochsucker. Johnson is a promoter of the homosexual agenda, and until he tells us why, we are free to conjecture that it may be because he is getting money or for more personal reasons.

ORDER IT NOW

During the course of the debate, however, Johnson made it clear that he is an avid supporter of the gay disco known as Ukraine. Johnson is an equally avid supporter of the narrative of the American empire. When I mentioned that he sounded as if he had been listening to CNN, he categorically denied ever having watched that network’s coverage of the war. He even endorsed fact checkers as a good source of information, while at the same time denouncing everything I mentioned as Russian propaganda, including commonplaces like Victoria Nuland’s role in the 2014 coup d’etat which overthrew Ukraine’s democratically elected government.

Which brings me to my main point. Mr. Johnson’s position on the Ukraine is identical to the position of Jewish neocons like Max Boot and Bill Kristol. Mr. Johnson’s ultimate allegiance lies not with the White Nationalists but with the American Empire because that empire supports both homosexuality and the racial narrative. Like the two-faced Janus he chose as his symbol during our debate, Johnson is duplicitously willing to espouse white nationalism while using his supporters to advance the cause of the Great Satan who presides over the gay disco. Perhaps this is why talking with Greg Johnson is like talking to the devil. It’s not just because he is so ardent in defending the policies of the Great Satan. (If any of my Satanist friends are offended by this comparison, I apologize.) I say this because I have read Goethe’s Faust, and in that play Mephistopheles describes himself in the following way, “Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint.” Which roughly translates as “I am the spirit who constantly negates everything you say.” Which is the best characterization I can give of his performance in the debate. As Mr. Johnson must know from when he was a Catholic studying philosophy, evil is the privation of being. Every time I made a statement which corresponded to a category of reality, like my claims about Nuland, Johnson felt compelled to rob that statement of its being by denial. There are obvious connections between Johnson’s debating style and the sterility of homosexual intercourse, but these became apparent to me only after the fact. In the heat of logomachy, all I could feel was a sense of exasperation, which will become apparent if Frodi ever releases the recording of our debate.

Sensing before the fact that this might be the case, I crafted my opening statement around a short survey of Ukrainian history in an attempt to show that the conflict there had nothing to do with race, as the term is currently understood.

The country we call Ukraine is a land of constantly shifting borders which only became an independent country in 1991. During the late classical and early Byzantine period, Ukraine was known as Khazaria, after the tribe that converted to Judaism in the 9th century.

In 1236 Nicholas Donin, a rabbi who had converted to Catholicism, met with Pope Gregory IX and asked him if he knew about the blasphemies in the Talmud. Full of indignation, Pope Gregory turned to Raymond Penaforte, then head of the newly created Dominican order, and told him to organize a campaign to convert the Jews. The campaign enlisted St. Thomas Aquinas, who wrote the Summa Contra Gentiles with that purpose in mind, as well as as Raimondo Martini whose contribution was Pugio Fidei adversos Iudeos et Mauros (The Dagger of Faith against Jews and Moors), and it culminated in the Disputation of Tortosa, which took place from 1413 to 1414. The disputation had disastrous consequences for the Jews who dissembled about the blasphemies that former rabbis exposed. The fact that they were unable to give a rational defense of their religion led to massive conversions on the part of the Jews.

By the end of the 15th century, western Europe was effectively Judenrein because the Jews living there had either converted to Christianity or, more importantly for our purposes, moved to Poland, whose boundaries at that point included what is now the Ukraine. Beginning in 1264 with the promulgation of the Act of Kalisz by Duke Boleslaus the Pius, the Polish nobility granted Jews unprecedented legal rights, turning the Ukraine into the paradisus Iudeorum. The Jews reciprocated by abusing their privileges and enslaving the peasant population through the monopolies they enjoyed in usury and the production of alcohol.

Four centuries later, the inevitable reaction arrived in 1648 when the Cossack hetman Bogdan Chmielnicki inaugurated a series of pogroms which eventually plunged Ukraine into war and revolution.[6]Iwo Pogonowski, Jews in Poland, p. 14 According to Wikipedia, “Khmelnytsky was a petty nobleman and Cossack officer who, [was] unable to obtain justice for wrongs suffered at Polish hands.” According to Heinrich Graetz, the father of Jewish historiography, a Jew by the name of Zachariah Sabilensky “had played him a trick by which he was robbed of his wife and property. Another had betrayed him when he had come to an understanding with the Tartars. Besides injuries which his race had sustained from Jewish tax farmers in the Ukraine, he, therefore, had personal wrongs to avenge.”[7]E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, p. 428.

The Chmielnicki pogroms took place roughly three decades after the term white was first used to describe human beings in a play about the Virginian tobacco plantations. The term white as a description of groups of people had no bearing any place else on the earth other than the British colonies in North America, and it had no bearing whatsoever on the Chmielnicki pogroms or any other conflict in the kingdom of Poland and Lithuania, where the fault lines were ethnic and religious.

After the first partition of Poland in 1791, Ukraine became the southern part of a largely Jewish region known as the Pale of the Settlement. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, “the Pale had a Jewish population of over five million and represented the largest component (40 percent) of the world Jewish population at that time.” In spite of what they suffered at the hands of Chmielnicki, the Jewish population in the Pale increased by 300 percent during the period which stretched from 1795 to 1918.[8]Pogonowski, p. 14.

ORDER IT NOW

After the partition of Poland, Russia awoke to find itself the home to 1,600,000 Jews on their crucial border with the West and all of the radical ideologies which were circulating there during the 19th century. The Jews who had checked out intellectually with the rise of the Hasidim movement which followed the disillusionment Jews felt at Shabbetai Zevi’s conversion to Islam in 1666 were now exposed to the thought of the German Enlightenment in a language closer to the Yiddish the Jews spoke than the language of their Russian neighbors.

According to Wikipedia, “Most Jews could not engage in agriculture due to the nature of the Pale, and were thus predominantly merchants, artisans, and shopkeepers.” Solzhenitsyn, however, tells a different story in Two Hundred Years Together. The Jews refused to engage in physical labor. When the Czarist government gave them horses and plows, they immediately sold them and lived of the money they earned from the sale in addition to usury and the sale of alcohol, which were their normal sources of income.

The universities which the Czar founded in 19th century Russia became hotbeds of revolutionary subversion from the moment they began accepting Jews as students. According to the Wikipedia account, “The large Jewish population was bound by numerous legal disabilities and, from 1881, victimized by recurrent waves of pogroms.”

Missing from the Wikipedia account was the role which Jewish student radicals played in the assassination of the Czar, an act which was carried out by Narodnaya Volya, which even Richard Pipes calls a Jewish terrorist organization. Jewish terrorism led to pogroms, which led to mass migration to the United States, where the Jews nursed their ancestral animus against Russia and longed for revenge. The Ukrainians had their own reasons to long for revenge. In 1925 Stalin dispatched Lazar Kaganovich to Ukraine to stamp out nationalism and promote industrialization, including the industrialization of farming. The result was the Holodomor of 1932-3 during which 4 million Ukrainians starved to death. Because of the Holodomor, the Germans who invaded the Soviet Union in 1941 were “greeted as liberators by some of the Ukrainian populace.” One of those Ukrainians was Stefan Bandera, who ended up collaborating with the SS Einsatzgruppen and killing large numbers of Jews and Poles.

The two forces seeking revenge came together in 2014 when the Jewish neocons who control our foreign policy under the direction Victoria Nudelman, wife of Robert Kagan, overthrew the democratically elected government of the Ukraine with the help of proxy warriors made up of that nation’s Banderite brigades. The Jewish president of the Ukraine is now one of the biggest supporters of Bandera’s progeny, who now make up the Azov Brigade, which is now asking for international support to fight for the “ethnostate” known as Ukraine against the Russians.

The new era of Ukrainian history began when Ukraine emerged as a nation from the wreckage of the Soviet Union in 1991. The same Jewish neoconservatives who promised Mikhail Gorbachev that they would not extend NATO one inch to the east overthrew the legitimately elected government of the Ukraine in 2014 and installed a Jewish puppet as its new president. That Jewish puppet has been replaced by the current Jewish puppet, who plays the piano with his penis and is now holding the Ukrainian people hostage.

As the history I have recounted shows, the current conflict in Ukraine has nothing to do with race, but it has a lot to do with the Jewish history of the Ukraine, and the Jews’ desire to use the Ukrainian people once again as human shields to advance their agenda. This is literally the case in Mariopol, where the Jews’ Nazi proxy warriors are refusing to let the Russian civilian population leave the city. All of these claims can be substantiated by videos on the internet, and all of them were disputed by “der Geist der stets verneint” during our debate.

After the coup which Victoria Nuland staged in 2014, Ukraine became the gay disco which Greg Johnson, for reasons only know to him, defended in our debate. As the Henry Hoeft video I mentioned during the debate makes clear, the same Jews who are turning Ukrainian civilians into human shields are using the white boys who volunteered to defend the gay disco as cannon fodder.[9]https://youtu.be/7e0jglju9Ss “They are trying to send us to Kiev with no fucking weapons.” People need to stop coming here. It’s a trap, and they’re not letting you fucking leave.” After Hoeft’s group of mercenaries told the Nazis that they weren’t going unarmed to Kiev, they were told to “get fuck out of there or they were going to shoot us in the back.”

We have in Ukraine a replay of Charlottesville, where people like Mr. Johnson urged the white boys to pick up spears and charge the machine gun nest. What was stupid then is suicidal now.

Ultimately, this discussion isn’t about race. It’s about Mr. Johnson’s support for the gay disco as much as it’s about Russia’s religious opposition to the gay disco. Ukraine is the easternmost province of the gay disco. Russia is fighting in the Ukraine because of that fact, not because of racial differences. We know that Mr. Johnson promotes the gay disco, but when I asked him during the debate if he had bought his ticket to Kiev, he said he had no intention of going to Ukraine to fight for what he believes. And, indeed, why should he when by pleading for “material support,” he can get other white boys to go over there and die in his place?

Notes

[1] https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1507838900554842115

[2] https://eppc.org/publication/ukraine-russia-and-the-world-a-conversation-with-george-weigel/

[3] https://eppc.org/publication/ukraine-russia-and-the-world-a-conversation-with-george-weigel

[4] https://electronicintifada.net/content/israel-lobby-group-adl-rehabilitates-hitlers-accomplices-ukraine/35021

[5] http://www.westsdarkesthour.com/2012/02/28/greg-johnson-on-homosexuality/

[6] Iwo Pogonowski, Jews in Poland, p. 14

[7] E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, p. 428.

[8] Pogonowski, p. 14.

[9] https://youtu.be/7e0jglju9Ss

 
Hide 427 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Dan-0-lee says:

    Unite the Right did nothing wrong at Charlottesville; it was the other side who broke the rules of civilised protest.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Disagree: SolontoCroesus
  2. Thank you for this detailed analysis of your debate with this poser-charlatan. His CNN talking points from the very beginning of the situation in Ukraine led me to delete counter-currents from my bookmarks. I will miss Jim Goad, but in 2022 the fakes are being exposed by their histrionics and diversionary ideologies.

    Anyone who brings to his comments section an objective viewpoint, based on the extensively documented events since the coup in 2014, is rewarded with a feminine blue-check like screed from Mr. Johnson. I assume he thinks this presents him as a “race-warrior”, leading his gay loving brigade of true LGTBQ nationalists in a call to arms. Instead, it just reminds me of a clip of one of the Azov soldiers hitting a Roma woman tied to a post with a dildo.

    I hope that his readers can see through this, but whatever. If not, they can buy tickets and grab a used AK from ISIS and plant their rainbow flag in the appropriate hole.

  3. Charlottesville was not morally wrong. It was stupid. Which is worse.

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
    , @36 ulster
  4. first of all, GJ is a flaming faggot.

    and second: globohomo has everything to do with race, because

    it’s leading edge promotors are

    the Jews. In particular, the ZOG regimes that now control

    all the remnant White nations….except Hungary and Russia.

    • Agree: CSFurious
    • Replies: @Tucker
    , @Jim Bob Lassiter
  5. I have always said neonazis are useful to jewish power. they are the readymade enemy. they are used to make antisemitism seem apolitical and deviant.

    • Agree: Lurker, Old and Grumpy, Thim
  6. pdxr13 says:

    No.
    Won’t die for gay disco music or clubs.
    Agree with President Putin about degenerate filth.

  7. Hibernian says:

    …the gay disco known as Ukraine…

    If you know any Ukrainian – Americans, this is a gross exaggeration. Their government allows things Putin does not allow, in which very few Ukrainians participate.

    • Disagree: Supply and Demand
  8. Eyegore says:

    Gay disco, like Berlin pre WW2. Cabaret (1972).

    Jews, Nazis, and Gays, all over again and again.

  9. @Dan-0-lee

    That is true but it was still foolish. It was a serious error to expect the enemy to honor concepts such as the ‘rule of law’ in areas where it has complete control. The Church of Woke does not believe in such arcane concepts as the ‘rule of law’. It instead believes in the law of rule – which means using the jackboot of state power to stamp upon the white man’s face – forever.

    The Church of Woke’s view of law is a good example of what E. Michael Jones correctly refers to “inversion”.

    • Agree: 3g4me
  10. Putin has HAD it. Better get tangible…like yesterday.

    Putin de-dollarizes after theft of Russia’s currency reserves by psychopathic bankers. Yep, that sums it up.

    https://thomashuxley.substack.com/p/putin-abandons-banks-and-the-usd?s=w

  11. Dumbo says:

    Yeah, I never much liked Johnson.

    Look, the problem is that you can’t completely trust homos, even if they are on the “right”. Some can be great artists or intellectuals etc, but being what they are, they will never be able to be completely sincere, unless they completely abandon their gay ways, which may be impossible for most.

    Neo-Nazis, the same thing. They are perfect to mask Jewish power. “We would never support Nazis because we’re Jews”. Wrong. It’s like they criticize Islamic terrorism on one side but support (actually created) ISIS on the other. Two-faced Janus indeed…

    There was even some Jewish guy saying that “Those Azov guys are alright, because they may use Nazi insignia, but they don’t attack Jews, only gypsies and Russian trash”. LOL. I kid you not.

  12. Never underestimate the stupidity of white boys.

    They are whummies.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  13. We have in Ukraine a replay of Charlottesville, where people like Mr. Johnson urged the white boys to pick up spears and charge the machine gun nest. What was stupid then is suicidal now.

    Not true. Johnson was at loggerheads with Richard Spencer gang and urged people on his side NOT to attend Charlottesville and blamed the organizers for falling into the trap set by Jews.

    During the debate, I asked Mr. Johnson why he supports pitting Slavs against Slavs when he is against pitting Germans against Slavs. If race is the fundamental issue in this conflict, could he please tell us if the Ukrainians are white or if the Russians are white. I never got an answer to this question

    Even though Johnson will favor Russians as whites against non-whites, he favors ‘Aryan’ whites of Nazi flavor over Russians, deemed somewhat less white due to mixture. I think Johnson wishes the Nazis had won WWII and defeated Russia, even if most Russians had been reduced to helotry. Johnson’s worldview is essentially Himmlerian. He admires Goebbels.

    To the extent that the Sub-Nazis espouse a radically racial view that certain Ukrainians are the true Slavs, the Aryans untainted by foreign blood, Johnson prefers them over Russians. Johnson will support Russians against Asians, Arabs, and Hindus, but when push comes to shove, he prefers the more ‘Aryan’ whites over the less ‘Aryan’ ones. So, even though he broadly accepts Russians as fellow whites, he can’t resist supporting the sub-nazi elements in Ukraine against Russia. For him, it’s WWII redux.

    Personally, if Ukraine were a mostly homogenous and sovereign country of Ukro-Slavs, I wouldn’t mind if it had some nazi-types as long as they minded their own business and defended their nation. But Ukraine is far more complicated, with many Russian-speaking Slavs. Russo-Slavs and Ukro-Slavs have to learn to live together, that is unless Ukraine breaks up.
    Also, Ukro-Slav sub-nazis lost all their legitimacy when they chose to ally with Jewish globalism. That is unforgivable. What’s the point of being a ‘nazi’ if you’re gonna do the bidding of Jews? That’s on the ISIS-level of stupidity.

    I will discuss later, because this passage isn’t about race, it’s about homosexuality and Johnson’s attempt to make homosexuality an acceptable part of the white nationalist movement.

    I would agree with this as long as homosexuals keep their stuff to their own sphere. Look, some people are born homo, and that’s just a fact. Still, these homos can be patriots, warriors, thinkers, and doers. Mishima was a homo but a real Japanese patriot. Frederick the Great may have been homo but was the greatest of all Prussian kings. Some of the greatest Greek and Roman arts and literature were created by homos. Homos contributed greatly to English literature. Homos have been a part of history. This virulent anti-homo stuff is rooted in Judaism, though modern Jews went 180 degrees and promoted homo as new god for goyim.

    The problem isn’t white nationalism allowing homos. The problem is the celebration of homosexuality, especially for straight people. Accepting the fact that some people are born homo and tolerating their behavior as long as they keep it in their sphere is not the problem. The problem is mandating globo-homo as a kinda neo-religion for everyone. That is sicko idolatry.

    If white rightists cannot tolerate anything homo, they will have to reject so much of Western arts, culture, and philosophy. While homos can be awful weird and perverse, they also have a way of seeing and feeling that, when utilized properly, can foster inspiration and creativity.

    I’m guessing Johnson is calling for allowing white homos to serve the cause of the white race, not for mindless globo-homo celebration of homosexuality. As long as homos keep their peccadillos to themselves, this shouldn’t be a problem.

  14. fran says:
    @Dan-0-lee

    Charlottesville was a trap that aimed to paint any organized opposition to anti-white policies as criminal. In hindsight it couldn’t be any more obvious: a torchlight march, Nazi flags, Richard Spencer (the most comically blatant controlled opposition in modern American history). No amount of following “the rules of civilized protest” was going to matter when the whole thing was orchestrated by hostile government forces and their rootless cosmopolitan benefactors that don’t play by the rules.

    • Agree: Old and Grumpy
  15. PJ London says:

    The invective and constant harping on the fact that there are Jews and Homosexuals is both childish and counter-productive.
    It is supported by both groups as it is so easy to ridicule. Everything is a “Hate crime”.
    80% of people don’t care what others do in their bedrooms, or even on the streets as long as it does not directly impact themselves. If you wish to be a sodomite, go ahead. As long as you do not require me to be the object of your sodomy, I literally do not give a shit.
    Similarly if you happen to be born of Jewish parents, or find some solace in Judaism, be my guest, I really don’t care.
    However my problem with Homosexuals is that like Harvey Weinstein, you use blackmail and coercion to further your sexual desires. I was invited to ‘improve my chances of promotion’ by a homosexual in HR as a young man. There is a cabal in most professions of men and women who give preference to those who are sexually accommodating. The performing arts, theatre and film are almost entirely controlled by homosexuals, entry and advancement is extremely difficult without quid pro sexual quo to any and all influencers.
    It is not because you are homosexuals that I dislike you, it is because you give preference in non-sexual situations to others like you, over merit and ability. As do Freemasons and ‘old boys from Eton’.
    It is not your homosexuality I despise, but your behaviour outside the bedroom.

    Jewish people have specific moral and ethical standards that they strictly adhere to. However those standards only apply when dealing with other Jews. Any non-Jew is treated to an entirely different, and quite disgusting, set of rules. There is no dishonour in cheating a non-jew, only in getting caught. Any lie or fraud is fine even admired when used against a non-jew, but is prohibited and socially rejected when used against a Jew.
    In commerce, 80-90% of deals are done in the Synagogue. Sure the paper is signed in an office but every one knows that the chances of a non-jew getting business from a jewish owned organisation is close to zero.
    I don’t hate jews but I hate the way they act. If a jew was to behave through life as a gentile does, then there would be no problem, but the unfortunate situation is that they do not.

    So writers please lay off the fact that their sexual practise or religion is important, it is their behaviour outside the bedroom and outside the synagogue that makes them pariah.
    Concentrate on that aspect whilst pointing out that they just happen to be homosexual or Jewish. Your message will be far more effective.

    • Agree: Franklin Ryckaert
    • Disagree: Exile
    • LOL: Father Coughlin
  16. Wokechoke says:

    While I disagree with Johnson’s position on Ukraine I fear this article is too broad a brush. Russia is a lot of trouble, Ukraine is a lot of trouble. Add a Jewish head of state there and its turned into the apocalypse.

    Without the elememt of Zelenskyy this dispute between the two Slavic nations would have been negotiated to satisfactory conclusions. That’s the real part. The issue of homosexuality isn’t the critical part. The advent of Zelenskyy as commander in chief is almost biblical in its catastrophic implications. It means the chief there doesnt even remotely connect with his “people” and the formidable little army that was trained there is being thrown away,

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Replies: @dimples
  17. G. Poulin says:

    I’m beginning to suspect that George Weigel is a deep state asset. He repeats the government/media narrative word for word, but with a few god-words thrown in to make it sound “Catholic”. So what have they got on you, George? Boys in your closet, perhaps?

  18. Wokechoke says:
    @Priss Factor

    Agreed about Charlottesville. Johnson predicted it would be the Altamont of the AltRight.

    But I do find his support of Ukraine to be almost inexplicable in the context of Zelenskyy being head of state there. You can’t have a European state headed by a Jewish rascal. Certainly not the largest geographical one. Certainly not the most disorganised and dangerously located one. It’s a perfect recipe for apocalyptic destruction. Lucifer over Luhansk.

    • Thanks: Father Coughlin
  19. Wokechoke says:
    @Eyegore

    National Socialism put a stop to the degeneracy of the Wiemar Republic. The Republic was very much like Ukraine Today. Jewish officials at the highest levels of politics, law, military police, academia etc. Hitler went over the edge in the first 5 years though. If he’d had the patience of Putin he would have had nukes and might have stopped the plague in Europe.

    • Agree: Joe Levantine, Towey, Biff K
    • Replies: @A. Nonymous
    , @Pierrelly
  20. Over at the American Greatness website, Victor Davis Hanson wrote an article “The Real Reset Is Coming”, wherein he wrote:

    “In the November 2022 midterms, we are likely to see a historic “No!” to this orthodox left wing agenda that has resulted in unsustainable inflation, unaffordable energy, war, and humiliation abroad, spiraling crime, racial hostility — and arrogant defiance from those who deliberately enacted these policies. What will replace it is a return to what recently worked”.

    I responded with a comment that elections even in favor of Republicans will do nothing to change the overtaking of representative government with unelected health bureaucracies funded not by taxpayers but Big Pharma and other Big Corporations who have aligned with psychopathic state governors. Nor will it stop American foreign policy being run by Israeli interests inside the government in both parties. Elections will do nothing to stop the next “reset” of a so-called global warming crisis and money crisis that ruins the middle class. I accused Hanson, the lifelong Democrat turned independent, and Neo-Con warhawk, of merely offering up yet another diversion and psy-op of a “democratic election” merely to control the opposition. I suggested readers stop reading Hanson’s book The Second World Wars and instead read Sean McMeekin’s book Stalin’s War: A New History of World War II.

    This got me “cancelled” at American Greatness. I imagine there are a lot of people like me that can look right through the propaganda of both parties about the Ukraine War.

    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
  21. …commonplaces like Victoria Nuland’s role in the 2014 coup d’etat which overthrew Ukraine’s democratically elected government.

    Basically three false statements in one short passage, about events on February 22, 2014, which I can clear up:

    There was no coup d’etat. The parliament (Rada) voted to formally remove the corrupt president with a substantial majority after he had fled the country a few hours upon having signed an agreement with three opposition leaders, which stipulated early elections – he could not win, – among other things, due to his lack of popularity after having been deemed responsible for a massacre of demonstrators just a couple of days earlier. There is no evidence Nuland, based in Washington DC, played a key role in any of this because the agreement was brokered primarily by EU countries, plus Russia, whereas – according to a tapped phone conversation – she had wanted to get the UN involved. It seems she was snubbed or outmaneuvered by the EU.

    The European mediation efforts began at the 2014 Munich Security Conference (January 31 – February 2) in a proposal by Baroness Catherine Ashton, from the UK, during a public panel discussion.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50th_Munich_Security_Conference#Euromaidan

    The two main opposition leaders, Kltschko and Yatsenyuk, were at this conference, as were Poroshenko, then the prime minister. Among the hundreds of conference guests were Lavrov, Pompeo, Brezeinski, Kissinger, Kerry, and others. Nuland does not appear on the participation list, linked to below; she was obviously not important enough. Yet Russian propaganda has elevated her to a magical but diabolical super-woman who orchestrated a coup d’etat.

    https://securityconference.org/assets/02_Dokumente/03_Materialien/MSC2014_ListOfParticipants.pdf

    Since I followed events at the time, I think it is quite amazing how such a patently ridiculous propaganda narrative was successfully shaped, years later, and is now duly repeated without thought at this web site. People who have accepted such nonsense as their “truth” need to re-examine many other false presumptions that have shaped their opinions.

    • Thanks: RVBlake
    • LOL: 3g4me
  22. Exile says:

    With friends like EMJ, White Nationalism does not need enemies. EMJ has a way of cheapening a perfectly defensible position with bad arguments.

    Charlottesville has nothing to do with the Ukraine and Greg Johnson had very little to do with Charlottesville.

    The only relevance Nazism has to Ukraine is in Nazism being misused and obfuscated by both sides to ennoble and justify their actions. I support Russia for many other reasons but their rhetoric about fascism vis a vis Ukraine is opportunistic and misleading – and the incoherence of ostensible fascists supporting a Jewish-led puppet government speaks for itself.

    I also don’t see the need to be queeny or circumspect about Greg’s support for the gay agenda, either. Greg is gay, everyone knows it – just say it.

    EMJ himself argues for petty ethnic identity at best – “there is no such thing as White,” Catholic Nationalism as a superstructure uniting Irish, Italians, Anglos etc… Yet he cynically criticizes others for not saying “White.”

    Greg obviously did not want to debate anyone with a legitimate White Nationalist agenda – he chose to debate a Christian/Catholic Nationalist instead. EMJ demonstrates why in this piece.

    • Agree: JM, 3g4me
    • Troll: A. Nonymous
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @JM
  23. The Ukraine, the poorest and most corrupt nation in Europe, (I don’t include the average poor citizen) is being and has been exploited by all the gangsters, everywhere, including certain very rich individuals in the U.S.and Russia. Much of this “news” is pure B.S., and has nothing to do with what is going on.The stuff happening can only go on in utterly corrupt nations.

    • Agree: GMC, Trinity
  24. Tom Verso says:

    Good to see a complete article instead of a ‘hook’ to sell articles at your website.

    Thank You

    • Agree: Emslander
  25. Rich says:
    @Priss Factor

    In our grandfather’s day, homosexuality was a crime. It has only recently been allowed to “flourish”. Did Euro-man not create great art, great literature, great music, a great civilization, all the while treating homosexuality as a crime? In ancient Rome, homosexuality was against the law and punishable by death. In the British Empire, buggery was punishable by death. In the French empire homosexuals were castrated and if they still persisted, faced burning at the stake. How has our civilization prospered since the emancipation of the homosexual? Every society that has tolerated degenerate sexual relations, like homosexuality, has fallen. It is usually just before the fall that homosexuality becomes legal, or tolerated. We’re right about there.

  26. nickels says:

    Nice article-
    ‘Jew Nazis’.
    Hmmmm.
    I am reminded of a speech by Asaad:
    https://rumble.com/vy5kau-west-has-no-principles.html

    • Thanks: GMC
  27. @Rich

    In our grandfather’s day, homosexuality was a crime.

    Because it was misunderstood. Religious people(who believe in non-existent god) just obeyed sacred texts. Using that logic, it was also right to burn ‘witches’ and go after heretics like Galileo.

    Among the scientific community, there was an idea that homosexuality was something acquired through childhood trauma. So, it’s an acute pathology that can be treated via medicine or psychotherapy. It was flawed science.

    Modern world cannot rely on religious texts. It is based on reason and science. And proper understanding of reason and science should convince honest people that some people are BORN homo, therefore it shouldn’t be criminal to be one. Given the grossness of the homo act, I suppose the act itself could be criminalized, but I don’t see much merit in locking people up for having been bung-donged.

    The problem stems from Jews whose own psychopathy goes unexamined. Following WWII, there were many studies of the white conservative ‘authoritarian’ mind and the paranoid pathologies of ‘antisemitism’. Right, white people can be irrational, and anti-Jewish feelings can be extreme. It can lead to something like Nazi horrors.

    But it takes two to tango. It’s unlikely that Jews have always been good and pure-as-snow, therefore it was entirely the fault of the ‘antisemites’. Jews have had their own problems, and those must be addressed and curtailed if Jews and goyim are to live in just peace.

    So, what happened? Jews used the Holocaust thing and made it nearly impossible to be critical of Jewish power, Jewish agenda, Jewish abuses, Jewish corruption. So, everything came to be molded and twisted in service to “Is it good for Jews?” Without any pushback, EVERYTHING became a matter of what Jews want. So, the law got corrupted. Science got corrupted. And Jewish hubris, a combination of victim-narcissism and success-arrogance, got totally out of control.

    Globo-Homo would have never made the gains it did without Jewish support and domination of key media and institutions. So, what should have been done? Criminalize Jewishness? No, honest criticism of Jewish power. With any such, Jewish power just grew cancerous, and it pushed this globo-homo stuff. As the homo thing was precious to Jews, it became essentially taboo to be critical of homos as well. As the result, homo vanity and perversion spread propaganda to young ones, and now 30% of Christian youths polled say they might be ‘gay’. It went from the need to acknowledge that some people are born homo to mass conversion of young ones to LGBTQXYZ mental-gender-confusion.

    Ideally in a free society, homos should be free to be homo, but they need to keep it among themselves. Why do we have month-long celebration of homo fecal penetration that is wrapped in ‘rainbow’ colors? Why do federal institutions fly the homo flag? The highest purpose of the federal government is to promote penises in anuses or guys getting their balls cut off to get a fake pooter(or cooter as the case may be)?

    One thing for sure, we need to understand that not only real homos born with weird ‘sexual’ tendencies but their personalities tend to be on the narcissistic and exhibitionistic side. Therefore, even as homos are allowed to be homo, they need to be watched and restrained lest they try to spread their influence into the straight world as groomers. Much of this LGBTQXYZ stuff is part of groom culture.

    Did Euro-man not create great art, great literature, great music, a great civilization, all the while treating homosexuality as a crime?

    Euro-Man did a lot of great things in history despite enforcing laws and practicing norms we frown upon today. All great civilizations had slavery or serfdom until relatively recently. Romans had gladiator fights and treated animals horribly. The history of Christian Europe is filled with stories of persecution and torture, inquisition and the like. Still, great things were done. Back then, not only was homosexuality criminal but anything deemed blasphemous. Even Christians killed other Christians over sectarian differences. Still, lots of great things got done.

    Instead of either/or zero sum proposition where we must choose between treating homos as criminals and celebrating homos as angels, I prefer the sensible and rational choice where we acknowledge some people are born homo and leave them alone to do their thing BUT we push back hard against homos who try to turn their ‘sexual’ identity into something that ALL of society should bow down to, bend over to, and celebrate.

  28. C.T. says: • Website
    @Priss Factor

    Instead of either/or zero sum proposition where we must choose between treating homos as criminals and celebrating homos as angels, I prefer the sensible and rational choice where we acknowledge some people are born homo and…

    True except for the last sentence.

    Science means the study of the empirical world (physics, astronomy, geology etc.). By definition, all subjectivity does not belong to the sciences but to the humanities, including sexual preferences.

    I will never believe that homosexuality is innate unless studies are made on separate monozygotic twins and, here is the key, the two families have radically different forms of childcare; let’s say, one treated the child well in a healthy culture and another treated him poorly in a sick culture. IMHO, that “they were born homo” is pure propaganda to play the martyr role.

    Regarding Greco-Roman homosexuality, I haven’t finished reading Thomas Hubbard’s, Homosexuality in Greece and Rome, available online. But it seems that that kind of homosexuality wasn’t among adults, but among a young man and an adolescent.

    Finally, what about the harsh criticism that the second in command of The Occidental Observer published about Johnson’s apology for homosexuality, have you read it? (I don’t have the time to find the link but it was published a couple of years ago).

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Bill
  29. Exile says:
    @Priss Factor

    There is no reason why homosexuality should not be criminalized.

    There are both genetic and environmental aspects to violent behavior as much as homosexuality. But yet we forbid and punish it. The act is more important than the motive in deciding what to forbid/punish.

    There are no pro-social aspects to homosexuality. It’s net-negative for starters.

    Grooming of children is almost universally accepted in the gay community. An alien analyzing gay people would rightly conclude it’s how they reproduce. The consequences of this for the child victims alone justifies criminalization of homosexuality.

    Their extreme levels of transgressive “shock me” behavior, aggression, criminality, contempt for norms and narcissism are a constellation of anti-social behavior that also justifies their exclusion.

    • Thanks: Father Coughlin
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Exile
  30. “In making these claims, Weigel must surely know that President Zelensky has called for volunteers to take up their AK-47s and defend the gay disco known as Ukraine, but as of this writing neither Weigel, nor Boot, nor Kristol have announced plans to fly to Kiev.”

    The Ukrainians have stated that they want volunteers with combat training, without which they are worse than useless. And the Ukrainian military has not been “decapitated”: Russian casualties are 2-3 times Ukrainian at least. Further, this reasoning is capitulationist to a degree similar to Petain and Quisling. Bowing to tyrants lets the worst examples of humanity rule the world.

    As for the title, I’m a young white man, and if I had military skills, I would be going to fight myself.

  31. @Exile

    There are both genetic and environmental aspects to violent behavior as much as homosexuality.

    But criminal violence lacks consent. A person is attacked without permission.

    However, we DO ALLOW for consensual violence. If two people wanna indulge in BDSM, that is legal. When men want to play football or engage in sports like boxing, that too is legal. It’s consensual.

    If a homo act is non-consensual, it would be akin to rape, like what happens in prisons.

    But if two homos consent to bugger one another, there is no forced violence.

    There are no pro-social aspects to homosexuality. It’s net-negative for starters.

    This is true of lots of things. Smoking tobacco. Nothing good about it. Or eating sugary junk food. Or sodapop, zero calories and causes many diabetes. But we allow it.

    While I wouldn’t call it ‘pro-social’, homosexuality has contributed greatly to arts and culture. But when its narcissism is fully unleashed, homos ruin culture, as they’ve done recently. But when restrained and sublimated, homo creativity can do wonders.

    Grooming of children is almost universally accepted in the gay community.

    Not true, but it seems true that pedo types are much more common among homos than among straights.

    Still, this is guilt-by-association. It’s like men are far more violent than women, but it’s wrong to say masculinity is toxic because more men than women are louts.

    • Replies: @Exile
  32. @C.T.

    I will never believe that homosexuality is innate unless studies are made on separate monozygotic twins

    I believed it right away. I thought about homosexuality when I was young and thought… “who would wanna a dick up his ass just for the hell of it?”

    Just think about it. Do you or any straight guy you know wake up one day and think, “Gee, maybe I’ll take a dong up my bung?” NO!

    So, if you feel a strong desire for that stuff, you must have been born that way.

    Also, you can tell some guys are homo from a mile away. Take Liberace. Talk about a gay mouth.

    Funny fact: Liberace sued and won for having been libeled as a fruit. LOL.

    https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2009/may/26/daily-mirror-medialaw

    Btw, currently polls show that even 30% of Christians have been mass-converted to LGBTQXYZ by education, so there are plenty of whites who are willing to fight and die for Gay Disco. And GOP is just gay club for Jews. Jewish Demand is Goy Command.

    https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/blog/the-gay-takeover-of-american-conservatism/

    • Agree: Angharad
    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Jack from Maryland
  33. Rich says:
    @Priss Factor

    Were the Romans influenced by Jewish texts? The laws against homosexuality have to do with diseases, disgust, and the humiliation of the participants. It is an unnatural act, as primitive men up until the late 20th century men knew. We’re all so “enlightened” today that we know better than our grandparents. Segregation kept people safe, strong law and order kept criminals at bay, strict divorce laws kept families together, etc. But we know better. If homosexuals are “born that way”, then so are necrophiliacs, should that be allowed? How about bestiality? And we have the evidence of past societies that show that once homosexuality is tolerated and/or accepted, that society declines. 23% of people under 30 identified as LGBQX in a recent poll. That’s the end of a society. Caused by toleration and acceptance.

    • Thanks: anarchyst, Father Coughlin
    • Replies: @Sue Dunham
  34. nosods says:

    “White Nationalism has only one message for homosexuals: White homosexuals have more important interests in common with other Whites than they do with non-White homosexuals. We have to resist falling for any form of the divide and conquer strategy used by our enemies to destroy our solidarity as a prelude to destroying our race.”

    There is no more impoetant interest than stopping & reversing the plague of homosxuality! Acceptance – nay, glorification, of homo-culture spells the doom of any civilization. It’s the last stop on the downward spiral into the depths of degeneration and barbarity. W have to resist falling for any form of the divide and conquer strategy used by our enemies to destroy our solidarity as a prelude to destroying our normal, natural, God-given heterosexual relations. White, black, Christian, Muslim, Jew, pagan, West, East, North, South, all must join together, to defeat homo-rot! There is no more important task! President Putin has drawn the line against it in Russia & Western neo-con fags are out to get him for it. The West is a lost cause now – even 44% of Republicans according to a recent poll approve of homo-marriage. But Africa, Asia, Muslim countries are still standing tall against it. And those in the West who still haven’t been reprogrammed can still fight a rearguard action. Never give in. God will find a way.

  35. Wokechoke says:
    @Karl Franz

    They’ve had about 15,000 troops captured or killed in Muriupol.

  36. Wokechoke says:
    @Exile

    Exactly, it was no debate.

  37. @Priss Factor

    According to Col. Mcgregor, the Pentagon makes it extremely hard to obtain accurate statistics on recruitment. But he said the military is severely undermanned and already stretched far too thin, with 40% of the current force non-deployable. To me that sounds wonderful, making any ground war against Russia a hopeless cause. If the Biden Regime tries reimposing the draft, my hope is that serious civil unrest would follow, especially since young women would be drafted too.

    I wonder if anyone reading here knows the current white male recruitment rate and white male retention rate? What is a white boy of average intelligence to do when good job opportunities, with chances for promotion, being denied because he’s the wrong sex and color? Under the circumstances it’s rational for him to think the highly paid all-volunteer military is his best option – that is, if he doesn’t mind dying for the Gay Disco.

    Great article, Mr. Jones. Greg Johnson is an immoral coward.

    • Replies: @Dutch Boy
    , @Truth
  38. C.T. says:
    @Priss Factor

    I believed it right away…

    That’s not a scientific fact, just your argument. Unless I have scientific data on a highly politicised subject (almost impossible in today’s West) I won’t believe homosexuality is genetic.

    And by the way, it looks like Kevin MacDonald deleted the article (by Andrew Joyce?) I alluded above, presumably because of pressure by Greg Johnson himself.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  39. anastasia says:

    The Nazis would never treat prisoners of war they way the Azov animals do

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  40. Dutch Boy says:

    The best result of this conflict for white people is a quick, negotiated settlement. This is a destructive war between two white nations that is having plenty of negative consequences for other white nations (Europe and the USA) and may have much worse consequences if it goes nuclear. Anti-Russian policies are also driving Russia into an alliance with very non-white China. Right now, it appears that Washington’s policy is to support Ukraine as means of an indirect war on Russia, which means a protracted conflict with even more destruction for Ukraine and economic damage to Europe and the USA and alienation of Russia. Absent US support Zelenskyy will have no alternative but to settle with Russia.

  41. Dutch Boy says:
    @follyofwar

    Col Mcgregor also says that only about 30% of youths between eighteen and twenty-five (cannon fodder material) are fit for military service. That is a stark indicator of our national decline.

    • Agree: follyofwar
  42. @anastasia

    Not real Nazis…..just a jew golem.

    • Agree: Lurker
  43. Tooty boy warrior culture.

    Whatever we think of Renaissance art and the like, homos regard them, despite all the religious images and iconography, to be sublimated lustful homosexual pornographic imagination.

    So, we see a naked Jesus in the paintings. Homos see just another crypto-pagan sensual fantasy.

  44. @Priss Factor

    Putin’s banning of LGBT proselytizing is looking pretty wise.

    40% of young Americans born between 1997 and 2012 identify as LGBT

    https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/02/why_nearly_40_percent_of_gen_z_identify_as_lgbtq.html

  45. Are white boys willing to die for ‘gay disco’?

    Well, the white race is willing to worship blacks as the most sacred race when blacks act like this:

    Johnson has problems but do does E. Michael Jones who refuse to face the fact that there are racial differences. It’s not just Christianity vs paganism. Blacks were converted to Christianity, but they still act black. Evolution made them more muscular and more aggressive, and that’s why they beat up whites.

    The idea that Europeans were just white negroes before the coming of Christianity is ridiculous.

    Even among savages, there are huge differences. American Indians were also savages, but they are different in temperament and muscle/bone structure from blacks.

    • Agree: Angharad
  46. map says:

    How does this Ukrainian Nazi alliance square with history? The Nazis occupied Ukraine, massacred millions of Ukrainian people, and slated the territory to provide slave labor. How does any of this square with the supposed alliance between Ukrainians and Nazis? These nationalist banderistas sided with the people that wanted to destroy them? Does that make any sense?

    The Banderistas did side with the Nazis, on the condition that they would fight on the Eastern front against the Russians themselves. The Nazis did not want this. Instead, the Nazis wanted the Banderistas to fight against the Americans and English in Western Europe. Bandera did not want that, and the Banderistas melted away from their German allies. This changed the relationship into a hostile one.

    This maligning of Ukrainian history with Naziism is insidious and it has a purpose: the Azov brigade is being created to provide an Eastern European version of ISIS and Al Qaeda. Like those organizations, they will be controlled by the CIA. Their supposed Naziism is the impetus for the US to “fake fight” it while it roams around committing atrocities in the area.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  47. Dumbo says:

    While there were many great artists and a few scientists who were homosexual, sodomy was banned and punished when they lived. Perhaps this is the way it should be, gays back in the closet. At most, we may close our eyes.

    Look, back in the 1980s, everyone thought that it was just about tolerance and acceptance, but now “gay liberation” has lead directly to “Pride month” and rainbow flags everywhere (even some churches), men pretending that they are women in sports, drag queen history hour, “gay marriage”, and homosexuals openly preying on children they “adopted”. No, thanks.

    The problem is we can’t pretend that homosexual sex is the same as male-female sex.

    Also, I am not sure they are completely “born this way”. There is evidence that in many cases it comes from abuse during childhood or teen years. One can have bad inclinations, but they can be corrected. It’s like saying “drug addicts were born this way” or “murderers are born that way”. Well, in a way, yes, as there are also probably a few genetic reasons for those behaviours. But it’s not predetermined.

  48. @PJ London

    Jews and Homos are the enemies of God.

    • Replies: @Sue Dunham
  49. @nosods

    One Homo-Jihadist destroyed an entire Gay Disco.

  50. I don’t like Jones’ metaphor of the gay disco. He shows his age. But I will go further than Jones and say that gay marriage is the hidden grammar of the War in Ukraine. Putin’s Russia is going the other direction on LGBTQIA while the West , with the help of Disney and the NEA, is goosing the % of queer youth up to 30%. CBS News reported that gay marriage in Ukraine was expected to happen “within three years”. Putin knows what it means to have NATO missiles on the Ukrainian border: Within the decade, the UN defines lack of “gay rights” to be a human rights violation and then – wham – Russia gets the Serbia treatment.

    Funny that WWIII would be started by something that the 2008 Obama campaign stated it was categorically against. Instead of World War Three historians will call it World War T.

    • Replies: @fray juan crespi
  51. Hibernian says:
    @map

    Instead, the Nazis wanted the Banderistas to fight against the Americans and English in Western Europe.

    The German fortifications on the hills above the D=Day beaches were largely manned by Eastern European defectors, not to say that these were Banderites.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  52. Exile says:
    @Exile

    Pederasty lacks consent too.

    Homosexual marriage lacks consent from the rest of society. It was forced on Californians – by a homosexual judge – after two votes against it.

    The gay agenda in general lacks consent and supporters have used “tyranny of the minority” via kritarchy to impose it.

  53. @Rich

    Were the Romans influenced by Jewish texts? The laws against homosexuality have to do with diseases, disgust, and the humiliation of the participants.

    Didn’t you once claim that the punishment for homosexuality in ancient Rome was to be sealed in a barrel with a fox and thrown into the Tiber? Still waiting for a citation on that one…

    The only reference I can find to Roman law regarding homosexuality is the Lex Scantinia, but as I have pointed out to you already, this law did not criminalize homosexuality per se. What this law apparently sought to prohibit was a free born male in a passive sexual role. Free born men were still allowed to bugger their slaves.

    Cite your sources, or else correct your understanding, dumbass.

    https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/lex-scantinia-the-hypocritical-roman-law-against-homosexuality-ef318d0fe3c

    • Replies: @Rich
  54. @Thomas Covenant Unbeliever

    That’s weird, since the Jewish Bible says the Jewish god wants Jews to execute homosexuals, yet Jesus Christ tells the Jews to tolerate those “born eunuch” who will not enter into marriage.

    Don’t feel too badly, it is perfectly common for “Conservative Christianity” to believe that Jewish intolerance is Christian. On the flip side we have “Reform Judaism”, which believes that Christian tolerance is Jewish. Such are the pitfalls of oxymoronic belief systems. If the God of Jesus Christ of the Gospels is also your God, then YHWH is your adversary, and faggots are your friends.

  55. Wokechoke says:
    @Hibernian

    Suppose that on the day a hard core Waffen SS division had just sorta been doing a patrol on the cliffs and beaches? Just in one spot mind.

  56. Bill says:
    @Priss Factor

    Given the grossness of the homo act, I suppose the act itself could be criminalized, but I don’t see much merit in locking people up for having been bung-donged.

    Yeah, well, as it turns out, laws against sodomy criminalize, like, sodomy.

    Ideally in a free society, homos should be free to be homo, but they need to keep it among themselves.

    So much the worse for “a free society.”

    I prefer the sensible and rational choice where we acknowledge some people are born homo and leave them alone to do their thing BUT we push back hard against homos who try to turn their ‘sexual’ identity into something that ALL of society should bow down to, bend over to, and celebrate.

    Asinine. Gay is either OK or it isn’t. If it is, then why not let them celebrate and evangelize? If it isn’t, then why shouldn’t society work against it? Who are these dipshits who are going to “push back hard” against something that isn’t wrong? Why aren’t they pushing back now?

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  57. Bill says:
    @C.T.

    I will never believe that homosexuality is innate unless studies are made on separate monozygotic twins and, here is the key, the two families have radically different forms of childcare; let’s say, one treated the child well in a healthy culture and another treated him poorly in a sick culture. IMHO, that “they were born homo” is pure propaganda to play the martyr role.

    It’s well understood that homosexuality isn’t genetic. Twins studies demonstrate that it isn’t significantly heritable. Furthermore, if it were to be genetic, it would have been selected out long ago. The claim that homosexuality is genetic is totally retarded. Can’t be true. No evidence that it’s true. Therefore false.

  58. @Jack from Maryland

    40% of young Americans born between 1997 and 2012 identify as LGBT

    You suppose Dems will one day be 90% ‘gay’ and GOP will be 90% straight?

    Of course, most of these young ones are not really ‘gay’. They are ‘gay’ in the way that people are ‘Christian’ or ‘socialist’. Just the correct thing to be. More status label than real practice.

    I doubt if 40% of guys will really take it up their arse.

  59. Conversion Therapy into straightness BAD. Conversion Education into homosexuality GOOD. It’s unscientific to turn a homo into a straight person, but apparently you really can turn straight people into homos… at least if you get to them at a young impressionable age when to ‘come out’ as ‘gay’ is rewarded with smiles, sunshine, and ‘rainbow’ candy. Globo-Homo is Queertianity, or Jewish substituting of goy moral culture with a demonic cult controlled and bankrolled by Jews.

    Goyim are turning into Gayim cuz they are SOOOO dumb.

  60. @Jack from Maryland

    When a world becomes gutless in face of Jewish Power, the result is as follows:

  61. Rich says:
    @Sue Dunham

    Didn’t your name used to be Steve Dunham? When did you become a Sue? I hope you didn’t go all in on the surgery. You’re on the right track with the Lex Scantina about the punishment for homosexuals in Rome, If you read the actual wording, and not the Wiki “explanation” you’ll find what you’re looking for.. DuVey’s ‘Ancient Rome’ goes very deep into Roman Law, although finding any copy, let alone one in English is very difficult. Enzo Baldi of the University of Bologna has also written extensively about Roman Law, if you can read Italian.

    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Sue Dunham
  62. C.T. says:
    @Rich

    If what you say is true, it disproves what Greg Johnson’s apologist says above. If there is one thing that irritates me, it is that today’s homo community uses the ancient Greco-Roman world to justify their perversions. (If there is a color that is missing from the multicolored LGBT flag, it is pederasty as understood by the ancient Greco-Romans, which was tolerated although not fully accepted.)

    • Replies: @Rich
  63. @Bill

    Gay is either OK or it isn’t. If it is, then why not let them celebrate and evangelize? If it isn’t, then why shouldn’t society work against it?

    That’s wombatty.

    Free Society isn’t built on a binary of good/legal and bad/illegal.

    There are so many bad things that are legal but aren’t celebrated. Take tobacco. Kids are taught in school that it’s bad, a cancer spreader. But it’s legal. Still, it isn’t celebrated, not even advertised on TV. We don’t have Smoking Pride month. There was the Prohibition that banned alcohol because alcohol did cause lots of social problems. It was a bad idea. Better was to legalize it but regulate it and warn kids about it.

    Or take pre-martial sex. Stats suggest its effect is mostly bad, but should it be made illegal?
    The real problems is it’s been normalized, even promoted, to the point where those who insist on sex after marriage are mocked and ridiculed.

    If something should be criminalized, it’s gambling as its theft pure and simple. But then, it will lead to organized criminals dominating gambling. Still, even that might be better than the likes of Sheldon Adelson raking in gazillions and controlling the GOP. There was a time when most politicians didn’t want to be associated even with legal casinos in Las Vegas.

    The problem is about power than freedom. Homosexuality is legal in Russia, but the Power there will not allow its promotion as the New Normal. But the Power in the West is Jewish, and it promotes that stuff to subvert the goy world. Also, globo-homo isn’t about more freedom as the anti-homo voices are shut down and blacklisted. Twitter bans people who say Rachel Levine is a man, not a woman. And you won’t make it in the deep state by pointing out the homo act is gross EVEN IF you believe homosexuality should be legal.

    Or take tattoos. I hate it but don’t think it should be illegal. But the Power in the West decided to promote it, and so many young ones got ugly tattoos, something only few people used to do. And the Power perverted laws so that companies cannot fire people with gross tattoos and green hair.

    • Agree: Sarah
    • Replies: @Sarah
  64. One of the English poets commented that if you could see the spiritual aspect of man then you knew the man in the round. In Ancient Egypt what is translated in English as “spirit” is called “Ka” but what is less well attested is a female aspect called “Kat”.

    The Judas mammon worshipers in the West who sold themselves to the tribe have allowed the tribe to do what the Jewish writer Maurice Samuel promised they would do i.e. destroy the gentile world. The tribe cannot help themselves because their ancestral spirit makes them what they are and that is why hatred of Jews lacks wisdom whereas hatred for what their spirit has done, and is doing, is witness to your own Ka.

    If a boy is brought up surrounded predominately with women then spiritual bonds cannot help be formed and the breakdown of family life and other malforming influences ….. The Exorcist movie of the early 70’s was maybe unhelpful in that spiritual possession meant floating up to the ceiling and projectile vomiting but that is only the most extreme and hostile for habitation.

    The spiritual aspect of a person can and will determine attractions and revulsion but a spiritual education can sublimate and turn to the good even an unbalanced spiritual relationship. The tribe through their satanic spirit and control of the media has done what Maurice Samuel said they would do and he, unwittingly, was only confirming what Jesus had taught 2,000 years before.

    The bible is accused that on supposed revelatory and legalistic grounds it placed homosexuality under the ban but that is not so since in Ancient Egypt, millennia before the era of the Jews, the practice of it was placed on the same level as adultery and it definitely had a bearing on what happened when the person left this life.

    A person can sublimate spiritual forces and pass the test of free will or become addicted to rainbow displays (a satanic inversion of the biblical symbolism) we have today.

  65. Rich says:
    @C.T.

    I’m not as familiar with ancient Greek law as I am with Roman Law, but homosexuality didn’t become tolerated in Rome until the decline. I would guess it was the same in Greece. One author I read commented on how pederasty and homosexuality in the ancient world was said to be common only by pedophile and homosexual British professors during Great Britain’s decline, when those acts were becoming more common and more tolerated.

    • Replies: @Sue Dunham
  66. @Bill

    Whether or not homosexuality is “genetic” does not settle the nature/nurture debate. Even if it is purely genetic, your argument doesn’t hold water. Haven’t you heard of recessive genes? Haven’t you heard of gay fathers? There is also a theory that the more attractive a woman is, the more likely she will have a gay child. In this case homosexuality would actually be conserved by natural selection among straight people.

    But development also plays a crucial role. The first round of sexual differentiation due to hormones occurs in the womb. It has been observed that the more children a woman has, the more likely her younger/youngest son will be gay. It is hypothesized that the mother’s body actually develops an immune response to male hormone signaling after carrying male babies. In this case homosexuality is not genetic but nevertheless determined before birth.

    Homosexuality is as old as the hills and as contemporary as anything else. The only way to prevent homosexuality is to kill homosexuals. This tells me that homosexuality is natural and given by God. It is only Earthly law that has sometimes sought to do that which God refuses: rid humanity of homosexuals.

  67. @Rich

    If you read the actual wording, and not the Wiki “explanation” you’ll find what you’re looking for

    Why can’t you cite the actual wording [of the Lex Scantinia]? It sounds like all you have is a fuzzy memory of something you read a long time ago.

    • Troll: Rich
  68. @Rich

    homosexuality didn’t become tolerated in Rome until the decline.

    The decline of Rome is synonymous with the rise of Christianity. And here I agree: Christianity makes everything gayer.

    • Disagree: Rich
    • Replies: @Poco
    , @Poco
  69. With amsucker punch to the back of the head, the US State Dept. recaptured it’s lead in the race to be the number one state actor in the world for promoting the Gay Disco.

    And hat tip to the ADL for reminding us all of the inalienable right to “feel represented” that the founders talked about.

  70. Nezahualcoyotl, a 15th-century Acolhuan ruler of Texcoco, a member of the Aztec Triple Alliance (now Mexico), promulgated a law code that was partially preserved. Those who had engaged in the passive role of homosexual anal intercourse had their intestines pulled out, then their bodies were filled with ash, and finally, were burnt. The active or penetrating partner was simply suffocated in a heap of ash.[12]

    This is the natural man’s reaction to male-on-male sodomy, the act being so outlandish and the participants being assumed to be so depraved and beyond redemption for even considering doing such a thing, that the destruction of their person seems to be the only fitting reaction on behalf of society.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disembowelment#Texcoco

    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @gay troll
  71. Exile says:
    @Priss Factor

    Judging a group by its tendencies is not “guilt by association,” it’s pattern-recognition – again, similar to Jews, in which context we call it “noticing.”

    Look at the quickly-memory-holed confessions on social media a few years ago regarding the age at which gays lost their virginity. This was silenced and denied because mainstream America is being force-fed the idea that gays are “just like us” and sex with 10 and 12 year olds doesn’t fit the narrative.

    Molesting children is not like cigarettes or sugary soda, FFS.

    I lived in California for years. Every woman in California comes with gay friends – I’ve been around these guys for years, I’m in their conversations, I know what they are like and what they admit they get up to.

    Anyone who pretends that pederasty and criminal, anti-social behavior in general are not endemic among gays is either grossly naive or dishonest.

    Now do the usual cope and blame that on stigma. I’ve had these conversations before.

    “Homosexuality has contributed to the arts” ????

    Artists who are homosexual may have contributed but their homosexuality is a dubious component of whatever talent or achievement they have. Nepotistic capture of cultural bottlenecks and institutions by homosexuals (ala Jews) has a lot more to do with why gays are well-known in the arts than any innate talent they have, much less with their sexual orientation itself.

    • Replies: @InnerCynic
  72. C.T. says:
    @Father Coughlin

    That’s true, but the Aztecs also sacrificed children ritually to Tlaloc in this season of the year.

    • Replies: @Peter D. Bredon
  73. @C.T.

    What kind of White Nationalist thinks “The Aztecs had some good ideas?”

    Conservatives don’t like the word “homophobe,” and will good reason, but it does seem like the only way to describe someone who thinks handing over Oscar Wilde, a married White man with four children, to the Aztecs for ritual sacrifice, would be good for the White race.

    Sort of like EMJ thinks a Congo Catholic is superior to a White agnostic. Not a good plan for preserving the race.

  74. Tom Verso says:

    Your debate with Greg Johnson is behind his Counter-Currents paywall.

    Why don’t you post it on you site?

    • Replies: @Father Coughlin
  75. @C.T.

    … it looks like Kevin MacDonald deleted the article [i.e., on homosexuality] (by Andrew Joyce?) I alluded to above …

    I too either recall or imagine I recall a relatively recent article on homosexuality by Andrew Joyce, an article in which he was explicit in his moral and intellectual antagonism toward homosexuals, especially as regards their presence in the pro-white movement. If indeed there once was such an article published at the Occidental Observer, it has sunk without trace.

    Further rummaging through memory, however, suggests that Doctor Joyce might instead have written the article for Talmud and Taboo, his seemingly now defunct BitChute site. If that is so, it is very unlikely that the article’s disappearance could be traced to pressure from Greg Johnson.

    To return to KM’s site, while it is undeniable that TOO has, of late, become immensely more welcoming to rabid Christophobes—most of whom hate Christianity and its once universally accepted moral orientation (including frank condemnation of all degenerate sexual expression) even more than they hate all things Jewish—it remains the case that a search of the site’s archives turns up roughly half a dozen articles that are unapologetic in their hostility to homosexuality and especially to the manner in which Jews have used it as a wedge issue in their transformation of Western society into a Jew-run sewer.

    Following are links to what seem to me the two best of those articles. I give pride of place to a two-parter by Brenton Sanderson, whom I consider by far the most cultivated man and the deepest thinker in the academic sector of white advocacy.

    (1) https://tinyurl.com/5ypy28yy
    (2) https://tinyurl.com/ya7js67x

    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Exile
    , @Commentator Mike
  76. C.T. says:
    @Peter D. Bredon

    Greg Johnson’s apologist who has posted on this thread has a point: homos are neither angels nor criminals.

    On the other hand, it is unfortunate that KMD deleted from The Occidental Observer an old article in which Andrew Joyce criticised Johnson’s apologetic of homosexuality. Yesterday I was looking for it frantically and couldn’t find it! (I should have copied and pasted it on my computer but never imagined that Kevin would cuck before Johnson’s complains).

    It would be interesting to ask MacDonald what happened to that article: a veritable demolition of Johnson’s defence of a lifestyle that drastically shortens the lifespan of those who practice it.

    This morning I asked this in the last article as an off-topic question, but whoever monitors the comments didn’t let mine pass.

    Anyone who has the confidence to ask KMD directly by email what happened to Joyce’s criticism of Johnson would do us a great favor. (Someone could have archived the entire article in his PC!)

  77. C.T. says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    You know that I am a critic of Christianity, but I wanted to talk about something else.

    I just mentioned to another commenter the missing TOO article. I remember with extraordinary clarity that Joyce responded to a Johnson piece that the latter had published in Counter-Currents defending homosexuality as a legitimate way of life (there are many articles on my site criticising Johnson for precisely that sort of homo apologetics).

    One of the things Joyce said in the lost article is that he found it very easy to deconstruct Johnson’s rhetoric; that it was full of fallacies. I remember that Joyce pointed out the venereal disease rates of homos, and that it was a kind of long-term suicide due to their tremendous promiscuity. Joyce cited world health organisations to support his claims, etc.

    If you have the confidence to email Kevin MacDonald, tell him to send you Joyce’s email. I would gladly republish that lost article on my blog…!

    • Thanks: RVBlake
  78. bert33 says:

    M. Minerals. Military. Money. M. The rest is a hyped-up sideshow and the blood may as well be ketchup.

  79. Truth says:
    @follyofwar

    To me that sounds wonderful, making any ground war against Russia a hopeless cause.

    Well, if a dirt-poor nation the size of Texas can fight them to a standstill…

    • Replies: @SS-The Independent
  80. @BarrenMetal1456

    Transcript of leaked Nuland-Pyatt call

    I had linked to this transcript weeks ago already so that people could verify that any interpretation of her plotting a coup was unjustified.

    • Replies: @BarrenMetal1456
  81. @Peter D. Bredon

    You’re arguing like a Jew, sir. I said nothing of the kind.

  82. Exile says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    Joyce’s piece “Against Mishima” (cross-published here) is also a good indicator of his bona fides on the degeneracy of homosexuality.

    • Agree: Pierre de Craon
  83. dimples says:
    @Wokechoke

    I would disagree. Zelensky is clearly a puppet of the Ukrainian nazi mafia. Without the element of the Ukrainian nazi mafia this dispute between the two Slavic nations would have been negotiated to satisfactory conclusions.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  84. Anon[173] • Disclaimer says:

    The gay movement began in the West as a movement of white males. The only sympathy they received was from the Left (which included numerous secular Jews). So, the white gay male agenda — which was about the freedom to go to their bars and then go home with their sex partners and not be arrested by the police — morphed into a leftist movement that supported the whole leftist agenda– feminism, abortion, communism, etc.

    At this point, there was a disconnect between what EMJ calls the “gay disco” and the “official” gay movement, which was no longer a movement of gay white males.

    Then, another disconnect occurred. In line with what the Marxist philosopher Herbert Marcuse said about “repressive desublimation”, the Left was co-opted by corporate America, which learned how to market and exploit dissent for its own purposes.

    So the question of “globo-homo” isn’t about what gay white men want, and it isn’t about what the Left wants, it’s about what large corporations want.

    They want slaves.

    But not too many, because robots will be doing a lot of the work. So, in addition to slaves, they want population reduction. This means the complete elimination of the heterosexual model that was the basis for society for thousands of years. Destroy the family. Reduce fertility. Encourage social isolation. Eliminate gender roles. Eliminate Christianity.

    Up until about 10 years ago, the oligarchs who actually control the West didn’t have the means to accomplish this. It could only be done through total control and surveillance. But now they can – with 5G, Big Data, nanotechnology, the Internet of Things (IoT), etc. All they need in addition to those technological tools are fake narratives like Covid, Climate Change, CRT, etc. — psy-ops that scare people into obedience and foster mutual hatred and division. That’s where we are today.

    E. Michael Jones understands the complexity of this situation and the forces that are behind it.

    And what is the response? Most of the commentators here miss the point by ranting about homosexuality which, by itself, has nothing to do with what is going on.

    This inability to see the forest for the trees is also common among the people Jones debates like Greg Johnson.

    What we might generally call the “white right” in the U.S. is mostly people with little, irrelevant agendas. If you even mildly criticize those agendas, you are canceled or they just won’t address the issue.

    Ukraine being (supposedly) gay-friendly is enough for Johnson to support it. Never mind that what Ukraine has been led to do by the oligarchs is resulting in a lot of white deaths. The whites don’t matter to Johnson — the great supporter of whites — if he can find support for his gay agenda.

    So, what does this all mean?

    It means that whites (so far) cannot unite. They will divide themselves over any number of issues like Christianity or homosexuality or libertarianism or whatever.

    I happen to believe that Christianity is something that can unite us. But there are two problems with that: 1) large numbers of whites falsely associate Christianity with Jews; 2) others reject it because it is not racist.

    Both problems are solvable: There is nothing in Christian doctrine that requires different races to live together. And a reading of the New Testament (in an older Bible, not the corrupted newer versions) will quickly disabuse anyone of the notion that Christianity is Jewish.

    But I don’t think people on our side want solutions. They just want to whine and complain.

    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Wokechoke
  85. Many anti-Christians tend to presuppose the truth of their own arguments. It is most irritating. They also suppose that the Roman Catholic Church is actually a Christian institution.

  86. C.T. says: • Website
    @Anon

    You’re wrong. The woke ideology, liberalism and all leftist or progressive ideologies are the final and ultimate fruits of the invasive weed called Christianity. Our Führer was 100 per cent right when he called Christianity the very first bolshevism.

    See my blog to understand it, or if you want a single article, this one:

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2019/03/07/on-empowering-birds-feeding-on-corpses/

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @Anon
  87. gay troll says:
    @Father Coughlin

    Weren’t the Aztecs also fond of goring virgins? And anyone else they could get their hands on? They built a fucking skull tower. Is this your example of a moral civilization? The lost glory of the “natural man”? If so then it is a shame, Father, that the Americas were converted to Christianity.

  88. Dumbo says:
    @Sue Dunham

    You seem like a complete idiot. Are you related to Obama’s mom by any chance?

  89. @Dumbo

    You’re the one who calls himself Dumbo. Two points for transparency.

  90. @gay troll

    They also grew beautiful maize. Your point? You’re perfectly free to deny that there is a natural revulsion to homosexuality and keep pushing the LGBTQ agenda farther and farther until it’s ‘dildos everywhere’, and hope that natural revulsion never comes back to assert itself.

  91. Wokechoke says:
    @dimples

    They still call Trotsky a Russian revolutionary in the history books and articles. We can easily look back and find he was born in Ukraine and was Jewish. Yet academics and press don’t mention it. Probably a close family relative of Zelenskyy if you dig around the records a bit. He was born in a town near to where Zelenskyy was born. The two can’t be that far apart, their ideology not that different after all.

    Anyway, these are the misrepresentation on a categorical level that you have to work with before you even begin to deal with current events and foreign policy.

  92. Wokechoke says:
    @Anon

    Excellent point.

    Globohomo is a subset of Glibertarianism. Corporations get to do whatever the fuck they like with you. If you look closely at box hardware stores there’s always a retired pensioned cop managing the place behind the scenes, like a prison…and he’s used to terrify the old geezers and young whippersnappers. He’s always a part share owner. The surveillance the degradation and exploitation are soul crushing in such places, the HR guy is alway a queer.

    • Thanks: Father Coughlin
  93. Rich says:
    @C.T.

    When Christianity ruled Europe, homosexual sex was a crime. When Christianity was subverted, homosexuality became mainstream.

    • Agree: Jack McArthur
    • Replies: @C.T.
  94. C.T. says: • Website
    @Rich

    It never became mainstream in pre-Xian Europe. The ancient Germans killed them according to Tacitus. And according to the recent scholarly book by Thomas Hubbard (who likes male adolescents), Homosexuality in Greece and Rome, pederasty was controversial in the Greco-Roman world; not fully accepted or “mainstream”.

    • Replies: @Rich
  95. “some rise by sin, and some by virtue fall” (Measure for Measure, Shakespeare.)

    “To keep me from becoming conceited because of these surpassingly great revelations, there was given me a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan, to torment me. Three times I pleaded with the Lord to take it away from me. But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ’s power may rest on me. That is why, for Christ’s sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships, in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong” (2 Cor 12)

    “God is ever in his perfection, man is ever in his failure…There is no perfection before the god”” (Instruction of Amenemope, New Kingdom)

    The big biblical sin is pride, the sin of satan, which is kind of ironic in view of all the celebratory marches which now take place under that banner. Texts from Ancient Egypt also associate pride with divine displeasure. In a way the Christian teaching regarding the fall of man turns the effects of original sin, human weakness, into a positive for not only does it oppose pride in a spiritually sane person it also inculcates the quality of mercy which opposes self righteousness.

    “Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged and the measure you give will be the measure you get” (Matthew 7.1 and 7.2)

    and that loops back to the first quote from Shakespeare.

    At judgement an Ancient Egyptian had to be able to say, even if only through prior absolution, that “I have not committed adultery, I have not lain with men”.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maat#42_Negative_Confessions_(Papyrus_of_Ani)

    • Thanks: Towey
  96. Rich says:
    @C.T.

    Homosexuality is a modern disease, brought on because of prosperity and atheism. It is a post-Christian disorder. The lifestyle is strictly prohibited in the New Testament. It is impossible for a person to be a Christian and a homosexual. Atheists and nihilists on the other hand often take pleasure in depravity.

    You are correct that homosexuality was never accepted in the strong, masculine pre-Christian cultures. Only after becoming overly prosperous, and more effeminate, did these people become degenerate.

    I’m curious as to why you write “Xian” when referring to Christian. Is it a Jewish thing? It comes off as a little effeminate, like writing BCE instead of BC. The kind of thing a limp wristed, angry homosexual would do. You might not be aware of that which is why I’m pointing it out. You can oppose Christianity all you want. Side with the Jews and the Islamists and the degenerate homosexuals and libertines all you want, but at least try to be an adult about it.

    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Sue Dunham
  97. C.T. says: • Website
    @Rich

    This article mentions Greg Johnson, right? Among the Jew-wise racialists, I have been one of his main critics because of his stance on homosexuality.

    But we do not need “Xtianity” to see homo behaviour as deviant. Whatever you want to call it, thinking you can aid in saving the white race while, at the same time, bending the knee to Jewish deities (Yahweh and Yeshua) is some kind of combination of insane, dishonest, cowardly, naive, or very stupid. To bottom line it, it won’t and can’t work.

    • Replies: @Rich
  98. Rich says:
    @C.T.

    I still don’t get why you’re afraid to write “Christianity”. What is that about?

    If you believe that Christianity is about “bending the knee to Jewish deities” you have been very poorly educated and have no understanding of history, or Christianity. There are a tiny number of pro-Zionist Christian sects that get a lot of media attention, for obvious reasons. They are all part of the post-Christian world that has brought about the decline of Western civilization. The Christian Churches kept Jews segregated in their own communities, it was the atheistic revolutionaries like the French who emancipated them and gave them full citizenship rights. It was atheists in the judiciary who gave homosexuals and other degenerates the right to practice their filth without risk of arrest. As faithful Christians Europeans conquered the world and put a man on the moon. It’s as secularists that the culture has been destroyed and the people have become effeminate. I can’t understand how people can’t see something so obvious.

    • Agree: Towey
    • Replies: @C.T.
  99. C.T. says: • Website
    @Rich

    First of all, I don’t see secular humanism or common atheism as a repudiation of Christianity. I see it as the culmination of Christianity from an axiological point of view. Way above I left a link to a short article explaining how some medieval monks held a militant ideology that now looks very much like the Woke movement. But if you want to understand why we see runaway liberalism as the axiological culmination of Christianity, you would have to read a bit of what we have published.

    A dozen years ago this seminal text by a Swede caused me to abandon the conservative position I had on Christianity (actually, in this text the Swede refutes my 2009 conservative stance, which is quoted):

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/red-giant/

  100. nickels says:

    Just listened to the Greg Johnson interview.

    Johnson is either:
    1) an inbecile.
    2) a tool

    His takes on the american empire and the ukraine situation is the standard CNN narrative.

    No intelligent person can hold so a view.

    Hence either ^^1 or 2, exclusively.

    Greg Johnson is a jewish misinformation plant, just like Jared Taylor.

    White nationalism is a completely Jewish run operation.

    • Agree: Ghan-buri-Ghan
    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Exile
    , @Towey
  101. C.T. says: • Website
    @nickels

    I would say that white nationalists have a very good grasp of the JQ. However, WNsts like Greg subscribe to Xtian ethics, and that’s the problem (remember that even in 2010 Johnson delivered pious homilies in his church in San Francisco).

  102. Anon[386] • Disclaimer says:
    @C.T.

    The kind of decadence you associate solely with Christianity was found in pre-Christian pagan cultures.

    As for “your Fuehrer”, let’s have a direct quote.

    And not from “Table Talk” which was published under the supervision of Jews.

    • Replies: @C.T.
  103. C.T. says: • Website
    @Anon

    There are two German editions that are reliable transcriptions of Hitler’s after-dinner conversations. The English translation is based on unreliable manuscripts. This video featuring David Irving and Richard Weikart explains it all in a few minutes:



    Video Link

    Weikart in particular wrote a book about Hitler’s anti-Christianity, based also on sources outside his table talks.

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @Anon
  104. Rich says:
    @C.T.

    Yes, Hitler was anti-Christian, he is also the biggest loser in German history. His ineptness led to the loss of enormous amount of territory, the deaths millions of soldiers and civilians, the rape of almost every woman from 8 to 80 by Soviet troops and the crushing of the German spirit. Hitler is not a leader to be lionized. If you favor Fascism, look toward Franco who won a vicious civil war and kept his country safe and secure for 40 years. Hitler opposed the Christian Church and died from suicide after his nation had been destroyed, Franco supported the Church and died peacefully in his sleep. Which was the better man?

    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Wokechoke
    , @Alden
  105. C.T. says: • Website
    @Rich

    You are reversing the blame. In committing the matricide of Europe (murdering Nazi Germany, see link below) Anglo-Americans heaped up their own funeral pyre.

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2011/12/10/hellstorm-book-review/

    • Agree: Liosnagcat
  106. Anon[167] • Disclaimer says:
    @C.T.

    Where you go wrong (and so does David Irving) is that nothing about Hitler, the Holohoax, or the war could be published in Germany after the war that wasn’t approved by Jews. Jews mostly from Britain and the U.S.

    The only reliable sources we have on Hitler’s thought come from materials already published before the end of the war: his recorded speeches and “Mein Kampf”.

    If you can give me some anti-Christian quotes from those, then I will concede your point.

    • Replies: @C.T.
  107. Ranchpig says:

    I loved the debate.
    1. EMJ has a confidence that almost comes off as arrogant, but the more I listen he’s just bare bones and unafraid. It’s an oddly uncomfortable pleasure since we american males are programed to be more feminine in our ways. I can see how he puts people off and infuriates others.
    2. He doesn’t suffer fools lightly. See point 1.
    3. His mind is so tenacious to holding onto his main points.
    4. I had never heard of GJ and he sounded effeminate. He hardly ever answered the points EMJ made. Just kept saying, lets go to the next question or I’m speechless. How he said “my conscious is clear” to the point EMJ said he was contributing to the slaughter was baffling. How a man can endorse losing a war with other people’s lives is telling.

    The more I listen to Jones the more I feel a hope that Logos really might rise again.

    • Replies: @C.T.
  108. C.T. says:
    @Ranchpig

    Could you provide a link to the debate?

  109. C.T. says:
    @Anon

    Mein Kampf is a PR text, so most of Hitler’s anti-Christian statements are rather subtle. But there are exceptions, such as what can be read just above the words marked in purple:

  110. Anon[167] • Disclaimer says:

    I don’t see anything anti-Christian there.

    • Replies: @C.T.
  111. C.T. says: • Website
    @Anon

    By the “destruction of the heathen altars”, that Hitler considers “fanatic intolerance” he was referring to the destruction of the Greco-Roman world by Xtians from the 4th to the 6th centuries:

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2017/10/25/criminal-christianity/

    And in the next paragraph Hitler adds, as you can read in the above pic: “With the appearance of Christianity the first spiritual terror entered into the far freer Ancient World…”

  112. Anon[167] • Disclaimer says:

    Hitler does not connect that “fanatical intolerance” to Christianity.

    He connects it to Jewish influence.

    Your point would be valid if Christianity in its authentic and original form accepted Judaism, but it rejects Judaism (which is why the Jews hate it and called for the persecution of Christians during the first three hundred years of the Church).

    You’re going to have to come up with more statements from Hitler in order to justify the “Jew on a stick” anti-Christian rhetoric I see here from Hitler admirers.

    If you read “Mein Kampf”, you will see that Hitler was initially appalled by the hatred of the Jews that he encountered in Vienna.

    It was only later, when he realized that Jews were hostile to Christianity and Western Civilization, that he altered his views.

    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Peter D. Bredon
  113. @Winifred Wagner

    Having a liaison with Adolf Hitler may not have been morally wrong ( He was single, she in a loveless marriage to an old sodomite ). It was stupid. Which is worse.

    • LOL: 36 ulster
    • Replies: @Liosnagcat
  114. Wokechoke says:
    @Rich

    While this argument has a point, I’ve certainly agreed with it in my youth, I think it’s wrong. The trouble with Hitler is that he did identify the problem the Jewish rule over Europe. He appears to have followed through to remove that total power and brought down a ton of bricks on his own head and Europe.

    Did he take his own concept too seriously and engage his rulers too destroy him and his folk? Yes it appears so. The shear size of Barbarossa indicates that Hitler had broad support in continental Europe. So he was just expressing what was on the mind of tens of millions of people.

    • Replies: @Rich
  115. @Rich

    You’re a tool, God help me for replying to you. But let’s focus on this gem:

    It is a post-Christian disorder. The lifestyle is strictly prohibited in the New Testament.

    So you claim that homosexuality didn’t exist until it was prohibited by Christianity? Why don’t you try running that logic through your neurons one more time?

    Besides your statement being logically implausible, we can refute it specifically as well. Homosexuality was accepted in pre Christian Greece and other pre Christian cultures. Even where it was not accepted it certainly existed. Including, later, inside monasteries and churches.

    The lifestyle is strictly prohibited in the New Testament.

    LOL, is that why Jesus Christ, the childless thirty year old bachelor, travels the countryside with a bunch of other dudes preaching liberalism and love? Is that why Jesus looks so pretty as he dies on the cross, all toned and long haired, as he tells his mother to now look on his beloved John as her son? Is that why while revising Jewish law about marriage, Jesus asks the Jews to understand eunuchs, including those who are “born eunuch”? Is that why Jesus calls himself the Morning Star which is the planet Venus and the goddess of love? Is that why Jesus is said to embody the Hagia Sophia or divine feminine wisdom? Do you understand Jesus Christ, at all?

    • Agree: RJ Macready
    • Troll: Rich, Father Coughlin
  116. Rich says:
    @Wokechoke

    He did identify a problem, but his solution led to the destruction of Germany. It’s great to identify a problem, but when your solution leads to a complete and total defeat, when you lose historical German lands like Prussia, when millions are killed, when your women are raped and degraded, when you die in a bunker in a destroyed city, you are not a success. You aren’t someone who should be followed or idolized. His mistakes were so egregious that the goals he set out to accomplish were turned upside down and his enemies were completely triumphant. He could be the worst leader in the history of the Caucasian race in that his stubbornness, his ineptness, led directly to the inundation of non-White people into the West. Had Mr Hitler been able to negotiate better or even been a better military leader, or at least listened to the right advisors, European people would have been much better off. He did give a great speech, though, I’ll give him that.

  117. KenH says:

    In 1925 Stalin dispatched Lazar Kaganovich to Ukraine to stamp out nationalism and promote industrialization, including the industrialization of farming. The result was the Holodomor of 1932-3 during which 4 million Ukrainians starved to death.

    Lazar Kaganovitch was Jewish. He was one of many murderous Jewish communists and the main reason why Ukrainians supported German troops and the SS which was their way to exact revenge against communist Jews. E. Michael Jones should have mentioned this fact.

    Greggy Johnson seems to oppose Russia because Putin persecutes white nationalists and Ukraine does not. Equally important to him is that the Putin government is anti-homosexual while the Zelensky government is globohomo.

    But what Johnson doesn’t seem to understand is that the Jewish occupation government in Ukraine needs the “Nazis” only for the time being but will persecute them as bad or worse than Putin is when they are no longer needed and/or when the Jews of America give them the signal.

  118. @Rich

    It’s interesting. Through the League of Nations, the neocon principle of “what happens within your own country, even if democratically elected, is not OK” was already afoot by 1920. Query whether the world would have left the Third Reich alone within German borders vastly reduced in size. Eventually there would have been a pretext to go in and do regime change.

  119. C.T. says:
    @Anon

    He connects it to Jewish influence.

    Yes, as I do. This is the masthead of our site and was published also in print form in the collection of essays The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour:

    https://hojaseliminadas.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/rome-judea.pdf

  120. Exile says:
    @nickels

    White Nationalism is something well above and beyond either Taylor or Johnson

    Taylor’s refusal to address problems that aren’t solely Black-White (e.g. Jews, homosexuality, etc…) has led him to triangulate and compromise with kosher nationalists, Brown-White-Asian vs. Black alliance shills, etc…

    He’s basically a civic nationalist – except re: Blacks. Not a White Nationalist, just a “get rid of Blacks” nationalist.

    As for the homosexual Johnson, “White Nationalist” is just a shorter way to say “Straight White Nationalist.” The gay “wing” of White Nationalism is Greg. Jack Donovan has never worn the label.

    I won’t call either of them “Jewish run,” but their own issues have made them strange bedfellows with Jews on problems too important to compromise on.

    • Thanks: 3g4me
    • Replies: @C.T.
  121. Wokechoke says:
    @Father Coughlin

    I agree. It’s troublesome.

    It’s possible to see ww1 ww2 Cold War and this Russo-Ukraine war as a sort of Anglo 100 years war into the continent. First Germany tamed then Russia broken. At various times it’s tempting to think it’s directed by Jews. Which can be demonstrated by the various viziers the British and Americans have used or been used by to do the task. Morganthau, Rab, Amery, Spiers, Kissinger, Zelenskyy, Lindemann, Cohen, Albright, Nuland, Blinken. Add Wolfowitz, Summers, Appelbaum and the Kagans to that list. Even Disraeli was part n parcel of this attack on the Czar in his day.

    Putin sensibly realizes these strange people are a world power and tries not to antagonise them as Jews. Will it do him any good though? Who knows.

  122. Rich says:
    @Father Coughlin

    You aren’t wrong, the English were determined to keep Germany down and were working tirelessly to foment anti-German animus. If Hitler had listened to those advisors who wanted a couple more years of preparation, if he’d been able to foresee American entry into the war and the depth of the Soviet military, he might have been more successful. I know, hindsight is 20-20, but with the benefit of hindsight I think we can all see ways the Germans could have tamed the Western Front and defeated the communists in the East. Inviting America to openly join the fight, getting tied down and ultimately destroyed in Stalingrad, failing to secure the resources necessary to prosecute the war and not being more trusting of the German missile program are all obvious blunders. When I see the photos of murdered civilians, raped women, bombed out cathedrals, I have to lay a lot of the blame on Der Fuhrer.

  123. anarchyst says:
    @Rich

    Hitler was pushed into war. It is remarkable that the Third Reich was able to last as long as it did, despite Germany being a resource-poor country. Advanced Third Reich technology is still being studied today, stolen by the “victors”.
    It was Germany against the rest of the (jew-influenced) world.
    If anything, we should have assisted Germany in rolling eastward in its effort to destroy jewish communist bolshevism. The world would be a better place today…
    It is interesting to note that the demonization of Germany exists to this day, led by jewish interests who still promote their phony self-serving, money-making “holocaust™” which has been proven to be a fraud on many different levels.
    An American cable channel, the “American History Channel” should be renamed the “American Hitler Channel” for the amount of anti-German jewish propaganda programs that it broadcasts. If one watches the anti-German propaganda that this channel espouses, one would have to wonder how Germany could have lost WW2. One must give credit to Germany for attempting to fight off the rest of the world’s jewish bolshevism.
    On this channel, Hitler is portrayed as leading research into German technology from atomic power and synthetic fuels to jet powered aircraft and other high technologies (anti-gravity technology) while at the same time, falsely promoting the impossibilities of exterminating “six-million jews”, using “bug spray” as an execution agent (ha ha) in “gas chambers” with no ventilation systems or gas-tight doors, and other “holocaust™” absurdities.
    Of course, the photos of typhus victims’ bodies stacked up claiming that they were “gas chamber” victims is a perpetual jewish propaganda trick that is still somewhat effective to this day.
    This channel also portrays Hitler as a syphilitic drug-user, and a mentally unstable individual with many faults. Hitler is never seen speaking softly, only his bombastic, high energy speeches at his rallies are ever shown.
    I would hope that more and more people would see through the BS that has been foisted upon the world for the last 75 years.
    The jews and the rest of the world should be apologizing and forced to pay reparations for the unjusitfied demonization of Germany.
    It is interesting to note that Asian countries do not have the same biased attitudes towards Germany and Hitler as does the western world today.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  124. C.T. says:
    @Exile

    I am afraid that I must agree, and I’ve written something about the Jones-Johnson debate here:

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2022/04/03/clueless-ukrainians/

  125. @anarchyst

    This channel also portrays Hitler as a syphilitic drug-user, and a mentally unstable individual with many faults. Hitler is never seen speaking softly, only his bombastic, high energy speeches at his rallies are ever shown.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but the History Channel never places subtitles underneath Hitler’s speeches, lest anyone be tempted to say. “what’s wrong with that?”.

    The jews and the rest of the world should be apologizing and forced to pay reparations for the unjusitfied demonization of Germany.

    This, btw, is a rule that conservatives should memorize. The way to get out from under a yoke, is not to politely ask that the yoke be removed, but agree with your enemy on the principle of the yoke, but assert that he is the one that should rightly bear it. If you’re lucky, you might get to “no yoke to be borne by either side”.

  126. @Anon

    “Christianity in its authentic and original form…” was a Jewish apocalyptic cult, essentially no different than the Essenes( of the Dead Sea Scrolls) which some go so far as to say are themselves actually “Christianity in its authentic and original form.” So, Jews.

    Jews are quite capable of “hat[ing] and call[ing] for the persecution of ” other Jews. “Two Jews, three opinions.” Also the recent case of the last two Jews in Afghanistan, who fought each other tooth and nail until the Taliban threw them both out. Or, the People Front of Judean vs. the Judean People’s Front, etc. It was well known in AD 1 that only the Romans could keep peace among the turbulent Jews.

    • Replies: @Anon
  127. @Sue Dunham

    As an apocalyptic cult, it was quite sensible for Christ and his followers to eschew marriage and family, even as Jews. You can see in the Epistles, arranged chronologically, how the failure of the Second Coming led to the faith being “adjusted” until celibacy was restricted to monks, and all the rules for family life were instituted so that it could continue as an ongoing — and profitable — scheme. Thus were born “family values” which Jesus & Friends had no interest in.

    Better points would be:

    1. If homosexuality is the greatest of all sins (as the obsession with it seems to indicate, shown here and everywhere on the Right), then why does Jesus never mention it? It’s not like he has no time or interest for such things; he says some pretty wild things about marriage and divorce.

    2. Jesus does mention Sodom: villages that reject the apostles will be punished “worse than Sodom and Gomorrah,” which suggests he agrees with Ezekiel, that the “sin of Sodom” was inhospitality to strangers, a big deal in the ancient world.

  128. @Father Coughlin

    Somewhere Revilo Oliver says something like “If a nation decides to exterminate its vermin, what business is that of any other nation?”

  129. Wokechoke says:
    @Peter D. Bredon

    The Millstone around the neck for diddling kids is widely understood to be a condemnation of homosexuality. But to be fair, it’s like saying he didn’t condemn murder. It’s a given. He just didn’t want adulterers to be murdered.

    • Replies: @Father Coughlin
  130. gay troll says:
    @Peter D. Bredon

    If homosexuality is the greatest of all sins (as the obsession with it seems to indicate, shown here and everywhere on the Right), then why does Jesus never mention it? It’s not like he has no time or interest for such things; he says some pretty wild things about marriage and divorce.

    Literally right after Jesus talks about marriage and divorce in Matthew, he talks about why some people may not get married. He calls such people eunuchs and he distinguishes three different types of eunuch: those who are made eunuch by others (ie, castrated), those who are born eunuch, and those who make themselves into eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of Heaven.

    I hope I don’t need to tell you that eunuchs were often sex objects in the ancient world, in the passive homosexual role. This is the kind of sex that Rich would surely approve of: good old master on slave domination. Jesus says some people are born eunuch; but obviously, no one is born castrated. So what is he talking about in this case? The only conclusion is sexual orientation. Jesus is saying that some men are born in such a way that they will never have sex with a woman. He says that the Jews should understand this and not punish it. Now remind us, did Jesus ever have sex with a woman? Is there anything in the scriptures that supports the idea that Jesus was heterosexually oriented?

    • Replies: @fray juan crespi
  131. Some comments on the above posts:

    If indeed it is argued people are born without sexual attraction to the opposite sex why should it follow they are born with an attraction to the same sex?

    Becoming a eunuch for the Kingdom of Heaven:

    “I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs—how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife— 34 and his interests are divided” (1 Cor 7:32-34)”

    THE PRACTICE AND PROHIBITION OF
    SELF-CASTRATION IN EARLY CHRISTIANITY

    The big sin in Christianity is not homosexuality albeit it can be a bad fruit of what is the big sin to many Christians.

    Sin Of Pride – The Sin of Sins
    https://www.allaboutgod.com/sin-of-pride.htm

    Pride is the deadliest of all sins because it leads to all other sins. Pride is delusional, spiteful, and bitter. At its root, it declares, “I don’t want God to be God. I want to be God!”
    https://www.christianity.com/wiki/sin/what-makes-pride-a-sin.html

    Christians have long counted pride as a
    sin—indeed, the “original sin” that generates every other and is the
    vital principle in each. C.S. Lewis speaks for many Christian moral-
    ists when he calls pride “the essential vice, the utmost evil.” He asserts
    that pride “is the complete anti-God state of mind” (Lewis, 1980, pp.
    121-22).
    https://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php/117031.pdf

    Jesus on marriage (between man and woman!)

    “Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’ 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” 7 They said to him, “Why then did Moses command us to give a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her?” 8 He said to them, “It was because you were so hard-hearted that Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. 9 And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another commits adultery.” (Matt 19:5~)

    The Church is the Bride of Christ – the god-man.
    https://www.christianity.com/wiki/church/the-church-is-the-bride-of-christ.html

    How to turn things to the good through sublimation?

    People are born with all sorts of impediments, people are born into all sorts of impediments and the there can be all sorts of mitigation but what has convinced me that satan is the principle driving force is the obsessive pressuring in the media, government and fallen religions to shove their sins onto others and their children.

    • Replies: @Black Maggot
  132. Anon[231] • Disclaimer says:
    @Peter D. Bredon

    You have no basis for calling Christianity in its authentic and original form anything other than what is written in the New Testament (for reliable English translations based on the textus receptus, I recommend the King James and Douay Rheims bibles) and what was decided by the early Church councils.

    I’ve heard all these theories about how it’s “really” something else.

    Those theories are bunk promoted by Jews and atheists.

    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @C.T.
  133. Cowboy says:

    I remember when Americans didn’t bugger into their neighbors business.

    Now, left, right, or center, people in America have all become karens.

    A country of busybody jew wannabes.

    • Replies: @Exile
  134. @Been_there_done_that

    I had linked to this transcript weeks ago already…

    This post is less than a week old, and we aren’t all keenly reading your past comments on other posts, or wherever you posted a link to that BBC transcript, but never mind (except to note the world doesn’t revolve around you).

    The issue may be that you think a coup requires assassination. It does not. Here’s the grand-daddy prototype, confected by Kermit Roosevelt (who seems to have regretted it) for the CIA in 1953:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d’%C3%A9tat

    You can read all about different interpretations of the US’s role, but it’s clear from the primary sources that, as in Ukraine in 2014, the US (and Great Britain) plotted a coup against Mossadegh in Iran in 1953.

    Connecting A to Z is never easy; they make it hard on purpose. Other actors played parts, chaos never admits precise plotting, but without the US (and Great Britain in 1953 in Iran; with all of NATO, which is a US puppet in the last few decades in Ukraine), the Shah was not likely to have been put in power.

    Same goes for Yatsenyuk, whom Nuland nicely endorsed in the tapped call with Pyatt: “Nuland: [Breaks in] I think Yats is the guy who’s got the economic experience, the governing experience.”

  135. C.T. says:
    @Anon

    But you forgot to add that the New Testament message is Jewish poison for whites:

    • Replies: @Anon
  136. Exile says:
    @Cowboy

    Is this your way of saying “homosexuality is a private matter?”

    If so, homosexuals appear to strongly disagree. They’re weaponizing the law to make sure their degenerate behavior is legally privileged and promoted.

    “Live and let live” libertarianism is all about sweeping the social costs of allegedly “private” behavior like drug addiction and sexual abuse under the rug.

    Again, look at what gays themselves admit (in their unguarded moments) re: being groomed into their lifestyle.

    When adult men are targeting 10-12 year old boys (who later brag about it on social media) and Lena Dunham is bragging in her autobiography about bribing her seven year old sister with candy to feel her up (and worse), this is a community issue, not a private one.

    Grooming kids into a lifestyle of anti-social behavior, drug abuse, suicide and disease is a very public concern.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Cowboy
  137. Tom Huxley sounds bit like E. Michael Jones.

    Sexuality is a mess in the NWO.

    https://thomashuxley.substack.com/p/sexual-problems-in-the-new-world?s=w

    And it’s ALL going to be linked to your bank account.

    https://thomashuxley.substack.com/p/your-bank-account-and-the-satanic?s=w

  138. @Wokechoke

    Although they could have easily gassed 6 gorillion Jews in 15 minutes or so, I think even the Nazis would have preferred peacetime emigration.

  139. Anon[231] • Disclaimer says:
    @C.T.

    “…the New Testament message is Jewish poison for whites.”

    No, those who say that it is are Jews or Jewish agents (witting or unwitting) who are trying to poison whites.

    All we need to do in order to show that is so is look at history and look at Jewish schemes as promoted in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

    If you read that text, one of the very first things that will strike you is that the Jews saw Christianity and monarchy as the two things they needed to discredit in order to accomplish their goal of world supremacy. They’ve done rather a good job of it, getting their agents like you to do their dirty work for them.

    As for history, Christian Europe (500 A.D. to 1800 A.D.) not only created most of civilization and its greatest accomplishments, but it incorporated into that civilization such non-Christian thinkers as Plato and Aristotle, the accomplishments of Rome, etc.

    Christians successfully fought off 1,000 years of Muslim attempts to conquer Europe. They explored and conquered most of the known world. They gave us the advanced math and science that have given us the technology that we have today.

    But then, around 1800, the so-called Enlightenment (the anti-Christian part) superseded Christianity and the Jews were given a free hand (some believe they had operated in secret through Masonic lodges before) once they were emancipated by Napoleon.

    The French Revolution destroyed Church and monarchy as they had existed up until that point. The scraps that remained in Europe were finished off through assassinations that culminated in the murder of Czar Nicholas II.

    Through their money power (which was already considerable as far back is 1650), the Jews were able to gain full control of both capitalism in the west and communism in the east.

    In the west today, Christianity is either false and Judaized, weakened, or moribund. In the east, it has had something of a revival in Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union. That’s the main reason why the Jews are hellbent on taking out Vladimir Putin. They consistently hate Christianity and do what they can to undermine the morals and traditions associated with Christianity. If Christianity were so Jewish, as you claim, they certainly wouldn’t do that.

    Yes, you can come up with quotes emphasizing that God wants us to live in peace and love our neighbors — even when they do us wrong. But somehow, following those prescriptions and being Christian did not weaken Europe. When Europe was strongly Christian, Muslims were kept at bay. Now that Christianity is all but dead, Muslims don’t even have to invade — they ‘re invited in and are able to rape European women to their heart’s content.

    The U.S., when it was strongly Christian, was not the depraved mess that it is today. There was no desire for multiculturalism, etc. There was no open border and no threat of a Great Replacement.

    • Agree: Towey
  140. C.T. says:
    @Anon

    So you are a Xtian who doesn’t believe that the NT was authored by Semites? Are you also a white nationalist? As Dr Robert Morgan commented in another thread, ‘White nationalists have failed because trying to stir up anti-semitism in a culture shaped by almost two thousand years of Christian delusion and a white race imbued with the conviction that a Jew is God is a fool’s errand’.

  141. Anon[231] • Disclaimer says:

    Why do you attach the letter “X” to “tian instead of “Chris”? What are you trying to convey by doing that?

    I would not assume that the New Testament was written by “Semites”, who today can be Muslim, Jewish or Christian. Jesus’ disciples mostly came from Galilee, which was heavily populated by Greeks and looked down upon by the Temple authorities in Jerusalem.

    Judea as a whole was also populated by Romans and Egyptians. Romans and Greeks appear to have been idealized versions (judging from their sculptures) of the Nordic Aryans so admired today by White Nationalists.

    It is even questionable whether Israelites, Jews and Egyptians in general at that time were racially “semitic”. A lot of the “non-white” racial admixture in the Middle East and North Africa may have come from the Muslim and Arab invasions and the subsequent importation of black slaves that took place 600 years later. The Ashkenazi Jews of today are a light-skinned Turkic-Mongol mix. At any rate, there was no racial census and people did not think in racial terms at that time.

    No Christian who reads Gal. 3:16 and Gal. 3:29 and other passages, including statements by Jesus, believes that God is a Jew. God –as father, son and holy ghost — existed before time and before there were any Jews.

    “God is a Jew” and “Jesus is a Jew” are almost certainly subversive Jewish inventions that — I admit — are believed in by many so-called Christians. But that’s all they are: so-called Christians.

    Dr. Morgan, while wrong about Christianity, is right about one thing: Anti-Christian white nationalists will get nowhere in the U.S. for the obvious reason that most American whites consider themselves at least nominally Christian.

    These anti-Christian white nationalists do more than just silo themselves off in an echo chamber. They positively beg to be disliked with their insulting language about “a kike on a stick”, “that sky fairy you believe in”, “Christcuck”, etc. It’s hard to imagine a group more committed to self-sabotage.

    You’d think they would know better. Their ideological forebears — David Duke, George Lincoln Rockwell, Tom Metzger and Harold A. Covington — did not make this mistake. They had enough education in history — which is the chief missing ingredient in white nationalism today — to know 1) that Christianity was more friend than foe, and 2) that attacking it would get them nowhere.

    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Kurt Knispel
  142. anarchyst says:
    @Exile

    Agree 100%…
    In the push for “rights”, we were told that all homosexuals wanted was “to be tolerated” and shown “respect”.
    However, that attitude has turned out to have negative ramifications and that nothing could be further from the truth…
    Sad to say, “tolerance” has morphed into demands for not only “acceptance”, but deference, to the whims of homosexuals, without regards for the rights of heterosexuals with differing beliefs.
    When homosexuals purposely target a Christian-run bakery or other business, making demands for not only “acceptance”, but using the “civil-rights” laws, forcing the owner to go against his principles, THAT, my friends is tyranny, under guise of “civil-rights”.
    Using the “civil-rights” laws to force business owners into actions that go against their basic beliefs is tyranny of the highest order, and has no place in American society. It is interesting to note that, in these cases where homosexuals wanted to “prove a point”, they bypassed many bakeries who would accede to their wishes and give them what they desire. As an aside, muslim bakers who refused to bake homosexual-themed cakes were NOT targeted for “civil-rights” violations—double standard, indeed.
    This kind of behavior garners no favors with decent people and furthers resolve against militant homosexuals who want not only toleration, but total “in your face” acceptance of their “lifestyle”–something that some people find that does not “square” with their beliefs.
    It appears that the success of “equal rights” for homosexuals has renewed a push to “normalize” other behaviors, such as “transsexuality”, “cross-dressing”, and other “gender fluidity” behaviors. There is even a push by pedophiles and their advocates to redefine (decriminalize and normalize) their behavior, renaming it “minor-attracted adults” rather than the perversion that it is presently defined as. The “slippery slope” started with the normalization of homosexuality, and has degenerated into the demands for acceptance of every form of human dysfunction.
    “Live and let live” used to be a staple of American society, but was eviscerated with every “protected group” using the so-called “civil-rights” laws to force others to not only tolerate them, but demand acceptance. Not good…

  143. Cowboy says:
    @Exile

    What I am saying is that you can find very few Americans only collectivists of one sort or another.

    You are exactly correct that Law is used as a cudgel and the public has been taught to fight over who holds the cudgel.

    Neutrality and fairness no longer hold sway with the people who occupy North America, only retribution.

    Of course if you have enough money you can usually purchase your way out of a coercive situation.

    At this point the bill of rights may as well be discarded for it is only mob rule.

    It is not easy being the Last American.

  144. Exile says:

    Neutrality and fairness are very White things. When this country was more racially coherent and power was de facto rooted in race and culture, we had more objective fair laws and governance.

    The Bill of Rights only worked within the context of a greater White national identity, shared history and values.

    What we’re seeing today is the inevitable result of a mongrelized society full of people superficially committed to a set of black-letter civic-nationalist principles in name only, or intellectually/aspirationally at best. They don’t feel it and they don’t live it – because humans are tribal. Being an atomized individual is a crisis state for humans – instinctively you know you need a group to really function.

    Being reflexively “anti-collectivist” renders you politically irrelevant. Politics is about collective action for collective goals. You can balance that with a reasonable degree of individual and group autonomy within bounds. If you take individualism to a libertarian extent, you’ve effectively opted out of power. No society based on libertarianism has lasted, even at the smallest scale.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  145. @Anon

    Christianity has largely erased history with respect to the tribe and the wisdom it contained. There seems be two main themes in the hostility to Christianity on UR?

    The first accuses Christianity of being virtually pacifistic by taking isolated passages which encourages peace but in doing so the excoriating rebukes Jesus gives in the gospels, also the use of force when he kicks overs the tables of the grasping money-changers and uses a whip to drive them away, have to be ignored (there are other passages).

    The second theme is virtually the opposite of the first i.e. that throughout history Christianity has been the cause of violence, wars and intolerance. Here is an example given by Roman Catholic priest and scholar concerning somebody who seems to be quite popular on UR:

    Receiving the representative of the German Bishops’ Conference, Bishop Wilhelm Berning of Osnabrück, in audience on April 26, Hitler declared: “I have been attacked because of my handling of the Jewish question. The Catholic Church considered the Jews pestilent for fifteen hundred years, put them in ghettos, etc., because it recognized the Jews for what they were. In the epoch of liberalism the danger was no longer recognized. I am moving back toward the time in which a fifteen-hundred-year-long tradition was implemented. I do not set race over religion, but I recognize the representatives of this race as pestilent for the state and for the Church, and perhaps I am thereby doing Christianity a great service by pushing them out of schools and public functions.” The transcript that records these remarks contains no response by Bishop Berning. This is hardly surprising: for a Catholic Bishop in 1933 there was really nothing terribly objectionable in this historically correct reminder.

    There is some truth in both forms of criticism but what is missing in both is balance. The Church was never absolutely pacifist but neither was Christianity the absolute war mongering ogre of intolerance and it relationship to the tribe was based on history and not the purely “Christ killers” theology that is falsely claimed today.

    For me what seem to be conflicting passages are more like buffers that limit the human tendency to go too far in one direction

    • Replies: @Anon
  146. Cowboy says:

    – Apparently deconstruction and CRT are White things as well which make your argument null. The same race/culture produced the ideas for its own destruction which are themselves based on race and culture.

    -The Bill of Rights was a bad compromise. As is always the case, the quest to centralize power always comes at the expense of civil liberties. The 13 colonies may have been the zenith of what man can achieve in terms of individuals ability to act with the least constraints from the Leviathan.

    – In a zero sum game of political power the Collectivists on the losing side may find irrelevancy better than other possible negative outcomes.

    • Replies: @Exile
  147. Anon[199] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack McArthur

    Could you elaborate on “Christianity has largely erased history with respect to the tribe and the wisdom contained”?

    I agree that critics of Christianity contradict themselves (or each other) when they call it too pacifistic on the one hand and too violent on the other. It can’t be both at the same time.

    Where I think Hitler is mistaken is in saying that the Church forced Jews into ghettos. No, it was the Jews themselves who chose to live apart from what they considered to be the unclean goyim.

    The Jews offended their Christian neighbors in two ways — by treating them with contempt and by serving unscrupulous rulers as tax farmers. They were allowed by the rulers to do what Christians would not willingly do to their Christian brothers: squeeze as much money as they could out of them for the ruler and then keep a percentage for themselves.

    Eventually, the ruler would hear that his Christian subjects were ready to revolt. He would then solve that problem by expelling the Jews, who were given all the blame. Then, when things calmed down, he would let them back in and repeat the whole process.

    As for what Christianity really is, that’s a large question. I think it is safe to say that no western Christian denomination is truly Christian. But I think it is also safe to say that the early church WAS Christian. There were numerous heresies that were dealt with successfully. Where the church initially went wrong was with Tertulian, Augustine and Jerome.

    If you want to know what Christianity stands for, you have to read an interlineal bible that accurately translates the New Testament from Greek into English. The same goes for the Old Testament being accurately translated from Hebrew into English. Then add a concordance that elaborates on how the same term is used throughout the Bible.

    If all of that is too much, then one should at least confine oneself to older bibles (King James, Douay Rheims) based on the textus receptus and then read the commentaries by Charles Spurgeon, John Gill, Matthew Henry, etc. Commentaries written before 1850.

    Then you will find out that – for example – the current claim by evangelicals that Russia represents Gog and Magog is an absurd and unbiblical claim. The Gog and Magog prophecy was fulfilled by Antiochus IV Epiphanes about 135 years before Christ.

    Further research into the early church will reveal that “eternal hellfire” as punishment for wickedness was mostly invented by Augustine. When fire is referred to in the Bible it means spiritual purification. To claim that God will visit eternal punishment on unrepentant sinners is to say that Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross meant nothing.

    I recommend, for those interested in exploring further, listening to the sermons of pastor Chuck Baldwin (Liberty Fellowship, Montana) and Dr. Raymond Burkhardt (New Zion Assembly, Trunews dot com). Dr. Lorrane Day has written some interesting books worth reading. A good history of the early church was written by Eusebius.

    I do not agree with Christian identity (God does not and never did have an unequivocally chosen people other than those who believe in Jesus), but Bertrand Comparet is well versed in ancient history and worth listening to. I don’t think any of these people would agree with me on every point, nor I with them. But I think a subject as big as Christianity can allow for some disagreement.

  148. I had cause to several years ago to research what if any were the Christian influences in what is today called the holocaust and did so by using the works of modern scholars much of which was published in the wake of a popular book with a controversial title called “Hitlers’ Pope” c. 1999. Because that book dealt principally with the role of the Church, naturally I read books by Catholic scholars (Phayer, Zuccotti..) as well as Jewish (Freidlander, Lewy…). I have no memory of any of them explaining the reason for the relationship between Jews and the Church other than in the context of “Christ Killers” and the seeming irrationality of any antipathy.

    It was only later I found out that was not the whole story . The main driver for that was finding out the malign influence of the MSM in modern culture was predominately under the direction of the tribe and that this phenomena was nothing new and indeed it was for similar corrupting influences that Christianity had traditionally sought to avert in its treatment of Jews in their countries i.e. it was not just based on theology. From pre-holocaust Catholic Encyclopedia:

    There remains only to add a few remarks which will explain the apparent severity of certain measures enacted by either popes or councils concerning the Jews..It was for the laudable reason of protecting social morality …. To some extent, likewise, these were the reasons for the institution of the Ghetto or confinement of the Jews to a special quarter….With regard to the special legislation against printing, circulating, etc., the Talmud, there was the particular grievance that the Talmud contained at the time scurrilous attacks upon Jesus and the Christians…. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08399a#Judaism_and_Church_legislation.htm

    Compare this with the Jewish Encyclopedia which might leave the reader bemused at the irrationality of the antipathy towards these innocent people. After reading what the Talmud says about Jesus and His Mother and their belief that non Jews are merely beasts to be used I am astonished that any Christian or Muslim land allowed them to settle in their country.

    The other thing I discovered through my links to Ancient Egypt was that Christians had only very belatedly found out what the ancient world already knew about them (e.g. “Haters of Mankind”) so the common view of Christ Killers being the sole source of the antipathy was clearly untrue.

    What we have today in the West is the fulfillment of what traditional Christianity warned about and sought to avert by limiting the harm these tribal people will visit on a host culture in conformance with what their demonic Talmud teaches. For as the Jewish writer Maurice Samuel boasted in the same year Adolf Hitler was in prison:

    “We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands.”

    The problem is that only a tiny insignificant number of Christians know what the Talmud teaches, know the curses issued against them, and in their innocence end up being used and abused by a tribe that sees them only as animals worthy of exploitation.

  149. Wielgus says:


    From 2008 but good…

  150. Exile says:
    @Cowboy

    Jews aren’t White. Deconstruction and CRT (a form of deconstruction) are Jewish.

    If you want maximum freedom, you need a country of White people to even have a shot.

    Libertarianism and Blacks don’t mix – unless you’re a Jew who wants a fractured polity to dominate and exploit.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  151. Cowboy says:
    @Exile

    If white people follow the Jews to hell then white people only have themselves to blame.

    The problem is that most people have a slave mentality and that slave attitude is easier for them because they don’t need to reason or deliberate on choices, the government and their employer make those choices for them saving them from hard decisions.

    As long as the government and employers provide people with just enough bread and circus most will slough through life. Take those away and most people will beg for their old chains. At this point it is probably too late to teach self-reliance. It will probably take a severe social breakdown to force people to learn the virtue of self reliance.

  152. @Cowboy

    Most people are sheep without shepherds these days. Nothing wrong with being a sheep. Nothing wrong in total self giving to the creator whom you love – spiritual slavery.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  153. Cowboy says:
    @Jack McArthur

    Jack, I have no problem giving deference to the Infinite but you and I will no doubt disagree on obligations to the Finite.

  154. Honestly, I think Chuck Johnson is a smart and sensible guy, and the reason that he wants to be inclusive of LGBT people is because he believes that it should be a single issue movement. I think he also believes that white people are magic: just be returning to white majoritarian rule in which our will is exerted and we are prioritized above all other groups, the whole of society will begin to heal. With the excesses of cultural Marxism beaten back, people will normalize again, perhaps.

    At least, that is interpreting it charitably.

    The religionlessness of the white identitarian movement is really its downfall because it becomes incoherent when it tries to examine significantly complex topics like the Ukraine. By being so obsessed with a single dimension of the conflict, and believing that they have to interpret the conflict through that lens, mistakes will invariably be made.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
    , @Exile
  155. @Priss Factor

    ” Following WWII, there were many studies of the white conservative ‘authoritarian’ mind and the paranoid pathologies of ‘antisemitism’. Right, white people can be irrational, and anti-Jewish feelings can be extreme. It can lead to something like Nazi horrors.”

    Adorno and Horkheimer were totally full of shit and their “scientific findings” were nonsense. They pulled theories out of their asses, made guesses….and settled on the idea that the best way to protect jews is to destroy the white family, pathologize ingroup preference for whites, and label white people “anti-semites.”

    It’s absurd to pretend, even momentarily, that white identity leads to any kind of “horrors.”

    However, at this point I could write a treatise regarding the fact that jewish hyper-ethnocentrism has done irreparable damage to humanity and may wind up being the cause of the destruction of all mankind.

    • Agree: Towey
  156. C.T. says: • Website
    @Anon

    I might reply on my blogsite. It’s useless to do it here.

  157. @Anon

    “If you read that text, one of the very first things that will strike you is that the Jews saw Christianity and monarchy as the two things they needed to discredit in order to accomplish their goal of world supremacy. They’ve done rather a good job of it, getting their agents like you to do their dirty work for them.”

    You nailed it.

    If Christianity is “good for the jews” then why have they done everything in their power to subvert it?

    Christianity was our ONLY cohesive group strategy (quoting KMAC)

  158. IronForge says:

    I only read down to Biden’s Whine-Tweet.

    Zelenskyy+Bidens+AzovNazi are all owned by Jewish-UKRanian Kolomoisky.

    The Alleged Bank Fraud Oligarch Kolomoisky.

    Zelenskyy via Kolomoisky’s TV Station;
    Bidens via Kolomoisky’s Burisma;
    AzovNazi as hired Muscle.

    Somebody remind Biden that he’s been owned by Kolomoisky now for several years.

    His SecState is a Jewish-Tribal, his Anti-RUS Scheming Murder-Witch is an Ukrainian-Jewish-Murican.

    Biden/Soros-Schwartz/Blinken/Nudelman-Khagan/Kolomoisky/Zelenskyy/AzovNazi…all are getting their Schemes Hammered into Smoking Heaps+Craters by Russian/DNR/LNR Forces.

    Biden won’t be around for a Second Term, neither will Blinken nor Nudelman-Khagan.

    Murica’s POTUS Hopes Lie in People like USA Senator Rand Paul and Congressman Tulsi Gabbard.

  159. @BarrenMetal1456

    Same goes for Yatsenyuk, whom Nuland nicely endorsed…

    You have made a huge leap from a coup in 1953 to an imaginary coup eight years ago. It was not difficult – certainly not conspiratorial – for Nuland to have recognized Yatsenyuk, based on his academic credentials, prior experience, and the fact that he had been proposed as a prime minister replacement in an earlier compromise proposal, which he had rejected because he did not want to be associated with a government under the leadership of the criminal thug president Yanukovych.

    Regarding the massacre of demonstrators, purportedly also including snipers, I have addressed this a few times already, including in the following comment a few weeks ago:

    March 14, 2022 at 8:04 am GMT
    https://www.unz.com/runz/ukraine-and-biowarfare-conspiracy-theories/#comment-5230719

    Yanukovych had already been responsible for deaths and torture of demonstrators in prior instances, and he also ordered the suppression of demonstrators on February 20, 2014, many of whom eventually got shot. It is interesting that so many comments at this web site bewail the fact that a mass murderer was formally removed from power by the Ukrainian parliament after having fled the country to avoid facing justice for his criminal actions. There must be some kind of perverse nostalgic aspect to attract the zealous embrace of Russian violence and totalitarianism.

    • Replies: @BarrenMetal1456
  160. Tucker says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    ” globohomo has everything to do with race, because it’s leading edge promotors are the Jews”

    Excellent point. And, the reason why jews push globohomo, tranny freak crap, and every other conceivable form of abnormal and degenerate behaviors – and why they target historic White European nations with these destructive aberations – is because they are working to reduce the number of White children who are born. Same principle drives their obsession to promote abortion, feminism, no fault divorce, homo marriage, and I also believe they are behind this MGTOW movement that is designed to influence men to shun relationships with women.

    Every one of these agendas. in one way or another, seeks to reduce or prevent the birth of White children.

  161. “But what Johnson doesn’t seem to understand is that the Jewish occupation government in Ukraine needs the “Nazis” only for the time being but will persecute them as bad or worse than Putin is when they are no longer needed and/or when the Jews of America give them the signal.”

    This.

    They are cannon fodder.

    I hate to see Nazis go to waste like that.

    And I take no pleasure in Greg’s crappy takes on both Covid and the Ukraine.

    Greg is a big brain and he should know better.

  162. @Anon

    “… that Christianity was more friend than foe…”

    If you leave the ianity off the Christ you might get there.

    Besides, the “New Testament” is changed all the time.
    Ianities biggest trap is the chore of the NT. The chore is the sermon on the mount.
    The sotm is confusing people about “they neighbour” and love in general.
    Am I your neighbour? I say NO. I am not your neighbour.
    Love me? NO! Do not love me! How would you love me?
    Projectional love is mental. Inherent love does need neither neighbour nor ianities nor any object for that (non) matter.
    It just is (within the lucky subject) and resonates within itself.

    The Moses religions are the curse of mankind. Christianity is the biggest trap for white man, because the Christ is real. The inability to differentiate between religiousness and religion is the enslavement. Religion has turned into the enemy of religiousness.
    No need to tear down the beautiful churches. But every need to sow up the mouth of the priest (& politician) and not to throw him out of the temple (re. the Christ with the whip) but to make him kneel and scrub the floor and clean the dungeons (and pray for himself) Ora et labora.
    And now I go and work.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  163. raga10 says:

    In the same Ukrainian election that put Zelenskiy in power, the far-right bloc got grand total of 2.3% of the vote. So yes – there are nazis in Ukraine. There are nazis in many countries, including Russia; any Russians concerned about “de-nazifying” their neighbourhood should probably start much closer to home than Ukraine.

    Also, while I would not be prepared to die for them, I have to say that gay discos were fun back in the day.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  164. Yet another brother war instigated by the nose.

    Will the goyim ever learn?

  165. @Karl Franz

    Fighting yourself is your most sensible idea yet. Beat yourself up.

  166. @Løvstuhagen

    Your comment is striking in its insight but even more striking in its charity, the virtue we can least afford to lose sight of. Thank you.

    Perhaps the greatest danger that the Satanic Jew represents to any and all who strive to dethrone him and destroy his influence is that, in so doing, they—we—will be tempted to become him.

    • Thanks: Løvstuhagen
  167. @Rich

    Are you implying that homosexuality is not biological? How does that explain gay behavior in some animals. What I feel is what prissfactor states above is true….they can be tolerated if they stay in their sphere, and keep their activities to themselves. And indeed, they can be an ally. I remember that shootout in Miami when Trump was president and how so many gays supported trump and became conservative. Then they become even more stauncher conservatves than right wingers. They know that their behavior will not be tolerated in a society brimming with blacks or Islam. White nations are heaven for them.

    I have no problem with them wanting to get married but at the same time I don’t want them to have their gay prides on my tax money just because they’re proud of being homo. Want gay marriage? Sure. On the condition that all gay pride marches be stopped in immediate effect.

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @3g4me
  168. This is ultimately a war between good and evil. The Russians may not be that good but the Western ZioGloboHomoNazi side is definitely the evil one. Unfortunately I don’t think the Russians will take it all the way, or do they even have the capacity, to completely defeat this Western evil side and may not even clean out the whole of the Ukraine but just settle to liberating the Russian ethnic parts of the country in the Southeast. The rest in the West will have to continue living under the evil which will keep on growing. Sure I’d like to se the Russians bite off more but not more than they can chew.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  169. @Rich

    That old French policy of castrating homosexuals, brutal though it may have been, is interesting. It’s basically disarming Satan and protecting the asses, and hence the souls, of the innocent. Of course many priests would have had to go through this procedure to protect the choir boys.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  170. @Haxo Angmark

    Your “first of all part” kind of goes without saying; it was the rest that constituted an observation I was going to post. It’s a good thing that Mr. Jones saved his only arguably significant untruth until the end
    (“Ultimately, this discussion isn’t about race.”) as I would not have finished reading the article otherwise.

  171. @Cowboy

    Theoretically, people who can’t or won’t learn the virtue of self reliance will simply find themselves in that proverbial “world of shit” and will die, leaving behind a majority who can and will or already have.

  172. Fascinating article and debate. Of course there are Ukrainian Nationalists (keeping their heads down), who will have nothing to do with the Jewish funded Azov and want nothing to do with Eastern Ukraine (dominated as it is by ethnic Russians and the Russian Orthodox Church) and instead want an ethnically pure Ukrainian state comprising West Ukraine with its capital as Lviv and the Ukrainian Uniate (Byzantium Rite Catholic Church) as its religion. This makes sense and would have been achieved amicably with ethnic Russian Nationalists creating their own state in the east, if it had not been for Jewish led globalists preventing it. As it is, it will probably be achieved anyway, after much bloodshed, in the same way that the Bosnian and Cypriot conflicts eventually were – separate ethnic group, separate state.

  173. @Priss Factor

    Italy, the seat of the Catholic church, was one of the first countries to legalise homosexuality as long ago as 1890.

    You’re making too big a dal out of science. It should do what it is supposed to do in the realm of the natural world but what has it got to do with the spiritual realm?

    About the witches I don’t know. If they were really trying to call up Satan and spread evil then maybe they deserved what they got, although I suppose some innocents were also killed based on rumours or spiteful neighbours. Don’t forget that those witches didn’t just cast spells but also used poisoned potions to accomplish their evil deeds. Some were probably serial killers and mass murderers. There are still witch hunts to this day, like in Indonesia. Then some medical doctors are like modern day witches, I suppose, and if fact some are also serial and mass killers using modern versions of the witch’s brew.

  174. @Priss Factor

    That’s where you’re wrong. You let the Devil put the foot in the door and now you’re fucked. No sooner had you legalised homosexuality, based on society accepting arguments you present, then they started legalising homosexual marriage and adopting children so they can groom then at home from an early age and further spread their evil. They keep shifting and spreading the goal posts and now you’re faced with fighting a losing battle, backpedalling fast, never being able to recover lost ground as they attack on all fronts, now with trannies too, and with ever-growing support among the general population that they recruit at an ever younger age even in kindergarten with preschool story reading hour, comics and cartoons spreading their propaganda, etc. You cannot compromise with unnatural evil, you can’t say a little bit of evil is OK and we’ll contain its further spread. Don’t get me wrong, I compromise with evil, like almost everybody, as I live in society, and kind of understand your arguments, but truth is truth and facts on the ground demonstrate what I say. And why should I give a toss about Roman gladiators and medieval witch-hunts when I have Abu Ghraib, Azov Nazis murdering and torturing, German bestiality brothels, and uncountable horrors and evils of the modern world?

    • Thanks: Etruscan Film Star
  175. gotmituns says:
    @Dan-0-lee

    “rules”
    —————————————————————
    Sir, you’re mistaken. There are no “rules of civilized protest”. There is only might makes right and survival of the fittest.

  176. Fred777 says:
    @Karl Franz

    “I’m a young white man, and if I had military skills, I would be going to fight myself.“

    Military skills are overrated. Keep your head down, don’t do anything stupid, point and fire your rifle in the direction of the enemy. Let us know how your tour in Ukraine goes.

  177. @Pierre de Craon

    Search engines are useless and the Internet is dead. There used to be so many articles and info that I used to easily get to on google with a couple of words but they no longer appear and I’m now being offered the exact opposite of what I’m trying to find. The internet has now totally become what it was meant to be: a tool for brainwashing and propaganda, disinformation, and like in 1984 a means of rewriting historical events.

  178. You just need to read the Jerusalem Post to know what most Israelis or supporters of Israel think of Ukraine and why Israel did not impose sanctions and remains on friendly terms with Russia.

  179. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:

    It is, of course, a Jewish war against Russia. But this time Russia will win. I believe that not for political or military but solely for spiritual reasons. Stay tuned.

  180. JM says:
    @Exile

    The only good thing said by EMJ was that he was on Russia’s side. His rationale was of that of his usual twisted self.

    • Troll: A. Nonymous
  181. Weave says:
    @Dumbo

    I have been a fan of Johnson’s Counter-Currents since Goad went there, but have been perplexed at Johnson’s personal opinions. He loves the vaxx and will ban anyone who even mildly criticizes the site. These are not traits of the love of freedom.

    The two-faced thing is going to sting. The truth always does.

  182. @Dumbo

    Not a big fan of Johnson either. I always felt that he comes across in a smarmy manner. As for him being a homosexual, -well he never asked me to go to bed with him, but why defend the gay disco to such a degree unless you’re heavily invested in it? You can’t discuss Ukraine without discussing Jews. I have read/heard talk that the Zionists have their eyes on Ukraine in case Israel collapses. I wish I had articles/videos to back this up. As Israel created and supported ISIS, it is supporting the Banderists in Ukraine as cannon fodder to fight their main enemy, Russia. The Zionists will vomit out these hard lined Ukrainian nationalists as soon as they become useless. Hopefully as debacle in Ukraine continues, a light bulb will go off in more Ukrainian minds as to how they are being played by globalist Jews.

  183. Towey says:
    @nickels

    As WASPS are responsible for the genocide of more white European peoples, on behalf of their Jewish masters, than any other group I go with the second alternative. One has only to read Hellstorm or Germany’s War to abhor the horror unleashed on white Germans by the allies, not only firebombing but starvation too.

  184. @Priss Factor

    Religious people (who believe in non-existent god) just obeyed sacred texts. Using that logic, it was also right to burn ‘witches’ and go after heretics like Galileo.

    Perhaps if you didn’t regularly comment in units of ten thousand words, you might long since have found the time to read a book or two about the content of religious belief generally and Christianity—even in its nuttier departures from orthodoxy—particularly.

    Although “respectable” reference books, including Britannica, try to make out that witch-burning was a horrendous problem for five or six centuries, in fact most of Europe’s witch-burning was done in and around Calvin’s Geneva during a twenty-year period or so. Moreover, the number of Christians, whether genuine or soi-disant, who either applauded or defended the practice isn’t remotely comparable to the number that deplored and fought it. As for the Western Hemisphere, once you’ve said “Salem” and “1692” two or three times, you have pretty much exhausted the topic. Even when witch-burning was at its worst, it caused perhaps 0.001 percent per annum of the deaths attributable to upper-respiratory infections.

    Still less is there any excuse for an even moderately educated adult of today to beat his breast over what befell Galileo when the facts are, figuratively speaking, lying at your feet. Are you, for instance, aware (1) that Galileo was neither convicted of nor even formally charged with heresy—he lived (as he himself declared) a “true Catholic,” died after receiving Extreme Unction and the Viaticum, and is buried in a church—or (2) that Alfred North Whitehead famously wrote that Galileo’s accusers had much the stronger case on their side at his trial? Of the half-dozen or so really fine treatments of the matter, you could do far worse than read The Crime of Galileo, by Giorgio de Santillana. It might help you, as Johnson told Boswell, clear your mind of cant.

    Then there’s this:

    … white people can be irrational, and anti-Jewish feelings can be extreme. It can lead to something like Nazi horrors.

    Robert Dolan has already given the paragraph from which these sentences are excerpted several well-deserved swift kicks, but surely there’s room for more!

    If the last forty or fifty years’ worth of heterodox, anti-Narrative examination of World War II has demonstrated anything, it surely is that roughly 70 percent of the “Nazi horrors” are slanderous fictions and virtually all of the remainder have been exaggerated to a ludicrous extent, especially when they are considered in relation to what the “good guys” did. Has anyone outside of Hollywood offered credible testimony that Hitler aimed at world conquest? Did evil Nazis ever commit war crimes comparable to the fire bombings of Tokyo and Dresden, not to mention the twin unpleasantnesses of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? And if the subject is death camps, shouldn’t we be talking about Eisenhower’s postwar pleasure resorts on the Rhine, where between 750,000 and 1.5 million German soldiers and civilians were starved to death or died of exposure solely for the crime of being German? James Bacque’s study Other Losses provides genuinely shocking documentation for this actual human holocaust. It makes a striking contrast with the mammoth holohoax with a capital H that has nothing going for it except lying eyewitnesses and the mystical sense, possessed by 99.9 percent of the world’s Jews, that they are victims of injustice and hate.

    To speak somewhat bluntly, from the quoted sentences straight through to the end of your comment, your argumentation consists largely of truisms, glib oversimplifications, or—as with the “Nazi horrors”—the more-than-occasional tacit agreement to treat Jewish slander as fact. Although there is nothing meritorious in attempting to paper over mistakes, abuses, and crimes of the past, it is just as bad, if not worse, to give credence, even implicitly, to falsehoods and slanders, no matter how durable or popular they might be.

    Ultimately, I guess, I fail to see what is to be gained by treating factuality and hard evidence with such distressing casualness—as if they were incidental or disposable objects, even obstacles—as you build ever grander rhetorical constructions in what seems no more than an apologia for the homosexual inclination and an all-too-graphic celebration of homosexual acts.

    • Replies: @Towey
  185. Psychopathic turnbuckler ZionLendSki fucking around in the Ukraina:

    Is that what Ukrainians are fighting for?

  186. @Sue Dunham

    Ver. 12. There are eunuchs, &c. Who when they might be husbands, become eunuchs for Christ’s sake, says S. Jerome. Christ here speaks of three sorts of eunuchs. 1. Those who are such by nature. 2. Those who have been made eunuchs artificially, that they may guard queens and noble matrons. 3. Those who have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of Heaven’s sake. Christ here alludes to Isaiah lvi. 3, 4, 5, where the prophet foretells that there should be such eunuchs in Christ’s church, and promises them a name better than of sons and daughters, yea an everlasting name.

    Made themselves eunuchs: This expression has two meanings. 1. That it is in our power with God’s grace to make ourselves eunuchs, i.e., chaste and celibate, and to keep so by a perpetual vow. This is the force of the verb, have made themselves, signifying a moral inability to beget children. If it were not so, He would have said, There are who make themselves eunuchs, or who endeavour to do so. But he says, have made themselves, i.e., have taken from themselves the power of generating, that is to say by a vow of continence. So S. Epiphan. (Hæres. 53), S. Fulgentius (lib. de fide ad Pet.).

    Origen took these words literally. He mutilated himself out of his love of chastity. But he was wrong in doing so, both because such self-mutilation is unlawful, as well as because lust is not thereby quenched but inflamed. Hear S. Chrysostom: “When He says, Have made themselves eunuchs, He does not speak of the cutting off of members, but of the suppression of evil thoughts. For he who mutilates himself renders himself liable to a curse. Neither is concupiscence thereby assuaged, but is made more troublesome.” For eunuchs sin in thought, through the desire of lust, grieving that they cannot fulfil it. See what I have said on Eccles. xx. 2, and xxxix. 21.

    For the kingdom of Heaven’s sake, that by continence they may merit it. So Origen, Hilary, Chrysostom, Euthymius, and S. Augustine (de Virgin. cap. 23). Falsely, therefore, do the heretics expound for the kingdom of Heaven’s sake to mean for the sake of preaching. As though it meant, There are some who abstain from marriage that they may be more free to preach the Gospel, or that they may be free from the anxieties which matrimony brings with it. For continence is not only to be praised and desired for such reasons as those, but for its own sake; because it is a great virtue, and because the victory over himself, by which a man overcomes lust, raises his mind to meditate upon and follow after heavenly things. Wherefore chastity makes men angels.

    He that is able, &c. Arabic, He that is able to carry it, let him carry it. Note here the evangelical counsel of celibacy, proposed, yea counselled, by Christ to all men, though not commanded. For these words, he that is able, &c., are those of one exhorting and animating to celibacy, say SS. Jerome and Chrysostom. Moreover, it is signified that as Christ gives this counsel, it is in our power to fulfil it, if we will invoke the grace of God, and co-operate with grace. Nor does the expression he that is able do away with the force of this; for all that this means is, that continence is a difficult thing. And he who is willing to put constraint upon himself, generously to withstand lust, to mount up to the lofty pinnacle of continence; let such an one embrace the same, let him receive it. All the faithful, then, have the power of continence, not proximate, but remote. So the Fathers already cited on verse 11. Hear S. Chrysostom, speaking in the name of all: “All, therefore, cannot receive it, because all do not wish. The palm is set before them: he who desires glory does not think of the labour. No one would conquer if all were afraid of danger.” Hear, too, S. Jerome (lib. 1, cont. Jovinian). “The master of the games proposes the reward. He invites to the course. He holds in His hand the prize of virginity. He points to the most pure fountain, and chants, Whoso thirsteth, let him come unto Me and drink. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.” From these things it appears how foolish and carnal is Calvin’s exposition, which is as follows: “You, 0 ye Apostles, think that it is a good thing to live without a wife; but I forbid any one to attempt so to do unless he is certain that he can live without a wife.” For Christ does not forbid celibacy, but exhorts to it. Neither can any one be certain that he has the gift, except either he have a revelation from God—which is given to very few—or else by experience has had proof of his own continence. And how can a man be certain about his continence before he has made the trial? Still worse is what Luther taught—that it is as impossible for a man to be without a wife as to be without food or drink. No doubt it is impossible for the heretics, but not for the orthodox, who are strengthened by faith and the grace of Christ.

    • Thanks: Towey
    • LOL: RoatanBill
    • Replies: @Badger Down
  187. @Commentator Mike

    Google is indeed used by its Jewish owners to (mis)direct your searches into a certain direction. Test case: try to find “david duke”. You will not find anywhere his own website, but only info against him, such as by the SPLC or the ADL.

    A good alternative is the Russian search engine yandex. Try there to find “david duke”, his own website appears as first. I have no complaints about yandex.

  188. @Karl Franz

    Michael remembers the Karl of 1918 and sends a little help for you:

  189. @Rich

    In very ancient Rome, homosexuality was just despised or mocked without being persecuted as such. From the time of Cicero to that of Marcus Aurelius, homosexuality was honoured as a more noble form of friendship, on the pretext it was above the utilitarianism of mere biological reproduction. Both among the Greek-speaking elite and also among the legionaries. Curiously enough, it is when the Roman empire started to go really decadent that homosexuality came to be condemned as immoral with more and more severe punishments with the generations passing, not necessarily under the influence of Christianity but rather of emperors and military commanders recruited more and more in the outskirts of the empire.

    In the French empire, well, no : homosexuality was de rigueur among nobles as a kind of sexual activity that set them above the commoners, condemned to utilitarian trades and sexuality. Homosexuality among commoners was rather condemned as an infringement upon a sexual lifestyle reserved to nobles. But real condemnations for mere buggery were exceedingly rare. It was nearly always condemned together with belonging to sects or heresies that advocated homosexuality as a form of initiation into their circle. Later on in the evolution of the French Empire homosexuality was judged as vicious but less dangerous than heterosexuality outside marriage as the former did not endanger the family structure as long as it was practiced in separate spaces. In the British Empire, homosexuality was considered as the most normal bodily amusement among gentlemen, condemnation of people for buggery was very ancient history.

    • Disagree: Rich
  190. @Exile

    The Bill of Rights only worked within the context of a greater White national identity, shared history and values.

    Did the Bill of Rights mention the Red Man?
    If “All men are created equal”, was the Red Man even considered a man?

    Please explain the wisdom of your Founding Fathers, so that we, in the rest of the world, may be inspired by their genius.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  191. Anonymous[168] • Disclaimer says:
    @Brooklyn Dave

    Not a big fan of Johnson either. I always felt that he comes across in a smarmy manner. As for him being a homosexual, -well he never asked me to go to bed with him, but why defend the gay disco to such a degree unless you’re heavily invested in it? You can’t discuss Ukraine without discussing Jews

    Listening to Johnson I now believe that the WN movement is as much proxy warrior for (((them))) as LGBT and BLM.


    Richard Spencer with Julia Ioffe

    • Agree: Ghan-buri-Ghan
  192. Anonymous[186] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dumbo

    Look, the problem is that you can’t completely trust homos, even if they are on the “right”.

    They define who they are, not by race, nationality, etc., but by their sexual perversions, beginning with the sleight of hand that there’s anything remotely gay or rainbow-like about coprophiliacs whose sexuality revolves around an obsession with male defecation so great that health experts among them working to prevent disease admit most are ingesting feces by the time they’re in their early twenties. Some gay lifestyle that must be, right?

    Some years ago an acquaintance who’d just retired as a career official at the UN said that, had he not been eligible for retirement, he’d have quit anyway since the administration of the important departments was in the hands of radical homosexuals whose chief objective was using the UN to proselytize sodomy and the rest of that agenda. He said the homosexual cabal was so ruthless it’d destroy anyone who even hinted at opposing it, much like the Democratic Party and increasingly the Republican. If I remember correctly, Michael Jones points this out in his book Barren Metal, going back to Medieval Florence when it fell for a time under the sway of a cabal of vindictive homosexuals.

    I wouldn’t single out Greg Johnson, however, since the Republican Party is undermining opposition to proselytizing what amounts to coprophagia and fellatio to young boys a thousandfold compared to Johnson’s following. And, how about Sean Hannity getting all kissy-kissy on the air with fellow narcissist Bruce Jenner, or who can forget Fox’ former newsreader “Shep” Smith who announced he wasn’t ashamed to go home “to the man I love,” which translated means engaging in coprophagia and fellatio and yet having the nerve to call it gay and compare such unspeakable filth with the rainbow?

  193. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Thanks, I’ll use yandex from now on. I’d also like to get onto telegram but they want your phone number so I won’t bother.

    Darkmoon.me doesn’t seem to exist any more? Any news about Lasha?

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  194. @Commentator Mike

    Russians will take it all the way, or do they even have the capacity, to completely defeat this Western evil side

    The Russians may not even need to. They have set into motion events by exposing:
    1. The USA is not intervening in Ukraine because they can’t. i.e. They are not as strong as they pretend to be.
    2. The alternatives to the Petrodollar system. The flood gates are now swung wide open. The US cannot do to Russia what they did to Gaddafi and Saddam when then dared to sell their oil outside the Petrodollar system. Hell, they can’t even stop India from buying.

    These two are like the two base cards at the bottom of the house of cards. They prop each other up, and they form the basis of everything else. The Petrodollar funds the US war machine, and the war machine enforces the Petrodollar aka Tax on the World. The collapse will come sooner than we expect. And it wont be a slow burn, it will be a sudden implosion.

    In a few years time, when we look back at Ukraine and the subsequent collapse of the USA, we will compare it with how the fall of the Berlin Wall signaled the start of the collapse of the USSR. Such sweet irony.

    After the USSR collapsed, they lost up to 5% of their population. When the USA collapses, there will be much more carnage. Americans are angry, looking for somebody else to blame, and armed to the teeth. It will be a Mad Max scenario.

    Mexico will then hurriedly complete the wall that Trump started.

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
  195. @Commentator Mike

    That old French policy of castrating homosexuals

    I read somewhere that the gay gene is passed via the mother. That is one smart, sneaky gene.

  196. The zionists hate the white Christians so it does not matter as long as the war kills Ukraine Christians and Russia Christians, it is a win win for the zionists, and the longer this war goes on the better the zionists like it.

    Zionists are destroyers of nations and humanity , it is what they do, it is in their DNA.

    • Agree: Towey
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  197. Towey says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    Thank you very much for your intelligent and erudite reply

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon
  198. Truthor says:

    If one has been to Russia one knows that homosexuality is alive and well in Putin’s Russia. It is just not allowed to be publicly celebrated, and rightly so. But Russia is not the saintly nation, heck, there it is almost all non-Christian. Abortion remains the go to means of birth control, Alcoholism is rampant, with the male life span around 55 years, and drug use out of control.

    Russia remains a materialist, secular state. Golitsyn warned us years ago of the make over of the USSR. It remains basically the same as one can see in the actions of Putin’s troops in Ukraine. Jones needs to stop drinking the Russian kool-aid.

    Is Ukraine worthy of defending against Russian aggression. Only if you don’t want to see it here and elsewhere.

    • Disagree: Badger Down
  199. Poco says:
    @Karl Franz

    Nice way to let yourself off the hook.

  200. The “gay disco” tagline is cute and everything, but the sincerity with which the the predominantly white, hetero US war machine believes in gay rights is identical to the sincerity they hold for the principles of human rights, democracy and national or bodily sovereignty.

    It’s all a smokescreen. It’s all propaganda. Designed primarily to get all the low information jock assholes on the side of beating up a bunch of faggots as things fall apart, as opposed to doing something useful.

  201. Rich says:
    @RJ Macready

    Homosexuality is not “biological”. Unless you consider mental disorders “biological”. But whether or not you go down the “born that way” path, the acts of male homosexuality spread disease, humiliation and the breakdown of society. Studies have shown the average male homosexual has hundreds of sex partners and engage in dangerous liaisons.

    Funny that you would refer to the rare homosexual actions in the animal kingdom. Male animals will mount an opponent to show itself to be the alpha and to humiliate the other. Hardly an endorsement of homosexuality.

    I doubt that many homosexuals are voting for conservative candidates. There may be a couple of them that even with their mental disorder are able to see that free markets, lower taxes and regulation as well as individual responsibility are the better way to run a government, but they are rare. If you look at cities with extremely high homosexual activity, say NYC and Frisco, homosexuals vote dem as often as the average black voter.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  202. Rich says:
    @Peter D. Bredon

    Several of the apostles were married, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, explained the role of marriage in the Faithful and St Paul spends a lot of time writing about the benefits of marriage and the proper roles of the spouses. You obviously know nothing about Christianity. Why don’t you write about the best public rest rooms to meet men? That’s a subject I’m sure you’re very familiar with.

  203. anarchyst says:
    @Desert Fox

    Add to that, the zionists’ favorite battle hymn is “Onward Christian Soldiers”.
    Not a joke…

  204. “One of those Ukrainians was Stefan Bandera”

    Wrong. Bandera was a Polish Ukrainian who only became a Soviet citizen in 1939 with the incorporation of Lvov and environs in the USSR. He must certainly did not suffer anything under the so called holodomor.

  205. Poco says:
    @Sue Dunham

    Historically illiterate.
    Corruption, invasion, infighting, exhaustion, and the Empire becoming too large to defend caused it’s decline.

    It consolidated in Constantinople under Christianity and became the Byzantine Empire which continued for another thousand years bearing the brunt of muslim invasion until it too succumbed. No Empire is forever.

    How’s about the rise of Christian Empires like Charlemagne, Russia, etc. and the recent resurgence of Christianity and Russia against globohomo kakistocracy.
    Just read all the “scientific” justifications for tolerating gayness in this thread alone.

  206. Thim says:

    I doubt the value of debating fags.

  207. armdkny says:

    Exactly, this war is the Russian’ first salvo against the global liberal order which has taken over Europe and North America.

    This is Russia basically saying the Order stops here, don’t even think about moving east.

  208. @Rich

    Homosexuality is not “biological”. Unless you consider mental disorders “biological”. But whether or not you go down the “born that way” path,

    The best way to find out is to have a gay son or grandson. Then one is really invested to find out the truth to its final satisfaction. One then cannot rely on trite arguments or cultural bias.

    It is like the question whether the afterlife really exists. It is for most people, only when they face their own mortality, do they really investigate the matter earnestly.

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @Exile
  209. Poco says:
    @Sue Dunham

    When the Western half of the Empire fell all of those vying for title of Emperor were non-christian (except Constantine) and in fact often persecuted Christians. You know little of the time period.

    Also, the Judeo part of the misnomer “judeochristian” is a little thing the friendly (((elven))) “intellectuals” slipped into the narrative in the mid 20th century. Congratulations on being one of their tools.

    • Replies: @gay troll
  210. 3g4me says:
    @Cowboy

    @158 Cowboy: You are being deliberately myopic. In a civilized society, children are presumed to not possess the maturity (social, physical, and intellectual) to ‘consent’ to many sins and illegalities. Adults, even those with below average intelligence – i.e. about half of even White adults – are considered to have agency. But both legal agency and Christian free will neither fully blame the sinner nor, more importantly, excuse the tempter – whether Satan or one of his fallen human minions.

    Yes, many Whites are ‘guilty’ of being swayed by Jewish lies and promoting anti-Christian and anti-White policies. This renders both parties guilty; it in no way excuses the originators of such doctrines.
    Self reliance and independence of thought is important, but even the most intelligent and energetic individual will fail without the support and assistance of other individuals, or the social conventions and institutions founded by a coalition of like-minded individuals. To term this ‘collectivism’ is simplistic and dishonest.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  211. 3g4me says:
    @RJ Macready

    @176 RJ Macready: Totally false dichotomy. Both the faux ‘marriage’ and the parades share the same degenerate wellspring.

  212. @Priss Factor

    I find it really amusing that all these White talk uses the term, ‘Aryan’, to denote White people; it is a Sanskrit term that comes from those “Aryans” who are racially the most mixed – some Indians.

  213. @Eyegore

    American gay disco 2022: Jews, faggots and niggas!

  214. I am not at all puzzled by any of this. When I do “A” it is right, but when you do “A” you are wrong. This hypocrisy exists even at a personal level so why the consternation that it exists in an international level.

    Fools rush in where Angels fear to tread
    Jews rush in were Satan fears to tread

    .and with the same consequences.

    Where Jews go confusion, chaos and bloodshed follows. We never learn because we keep these people around. They never learn because all too often they are the ones who bear the brunt of retaliation when people have had enough.

    If a Jew sees a septic tank and a piece of wood nearby, the poor fellow cannot help himself. He feels a strong desire, a compunction to stir the shit. That’s just the way it is and the way they are.

    The consequence though, and they being so smart they never seem to see this, is that he who stirs the honey pot gets some on himself. No amount of reason or logic is going to convince any of them to correct their ways. Leaders in the past have recognised this and realised the solution is to get rid of them, one way or the other.

    Sooner or later current leaders will be forced to come to the same conclusion.

  215. @Hibernian

    The Ukrainian women in Chinese universities (there are several partnerships dating back to the Soviet era that have continued along) are more aggressive standard bearers for globohomo than white American expats tend to be.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  216. I dedicate this quote by Dietrich Bonhoeffer to E. Michael Jones:

    Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice. One may protest against evil; it can be exposed and, if need be, prevented by use of force. Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion in that it leaves behind in human beings at least a sense of unease. Against stupidity we are defenseless. Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here; reasons fall on deaf ears; facts that contradict one’s prejudgment simply need not be believed – in such moments the stupid person even becomes critical – and when facts are irrefutable they are just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. In all this the stupid person, in contrast to the malicious one, is utterly self satisfied and, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack. For that reason, greater caution is called for when dealing with a stupid person than with a malicious one. Never again will we try to persuade the stupid person with reasons, for it is senseless and dangerous.

    This article is garbage, and a good example of why you guys (Jones, Anglin, etc.) will never win and do everyone, especially yourselves, a favor, by giving up and shutting up.

    No one is fighting for gay discos.

    People are fighting against fascist Russian pricks (not all Russians, just fascist Russian pricks and their enablers) who think they can tell their neighbors what and who they are and reorganize the world order at the point of a gun.

    Maybe American foreign policy has a say in it. They’re allowed to have a say.
    Maybe some Jewish people, on account of some long and legitimate Jewish history in the Ukraine, have a say in it. They’re allowed to have a say.

    Day end: Ukrainians decide. If a gay disco is a weather vane to tell us who the prick is, as if invading a neighboring country, expending 1000 cruise missiles and tens of thousands of artillery shells were not clear enough a statement , then fine, let gay discos be the weather vane, if, in fact, you are that obtuse.

    And yes, in the spirit of the insight of Bonhoeffer, E. Michael Jones is just that obtuse.

    • LOL: 3g4me
    • Troll: follyofwar
    • Replies: @GenFranco
  217. Dear Micheal Jones, I do like you and support you but please be more concise and more brief. Like a boxer, land a one x two on the noggin. When you think you have landed a couple of good ones on the ziocns , write and let us know.
    Your blog will have more punch.

  218. @Priss Factor

    “ I would agree with this as long as homosexuals keep their stuff to their own sphere.”

    They don’t call it “GlobalHomo” because they keep their stuff to their sphere. The problem with 2SLGBTQQIAPWXYZ is, they stick their stuff up anything that has an anal cavity. Catholic Priests we’re not born that way, they created a pedophile protected network cloaked under the shield of the Catholic Church to rape, sodomize and moleste kids with the blessings of the church.

    Drag Queen Story Time trannys we’re also not born that way, they created a network of protected pedophile trannys to moleste children under cloak and banner of a rainbow flag and LGBTIQPWXYZ GlobalHomo power of the media industrial complex where (((Hollywood))) reigns.

    You need to watch a few gay pride parades to see what really is taking place. It’s not just about homosexuals anymore, it’s about 2SLGBTQQIAPWXYZ.

    CQ describes The World Power main oligarchic groups as GlobalHomoZioBIGsRxMIC3BLM/R

    GlobalHomo = 2SLGBTQQIAPWXYZ+ – Two Spirit, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Beastiality, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, Intersex, Asexual people, and Pedophiles. + added to cover the overlooked.

    Zio = Banking financial, usury, Academia, Media monopoly.


    BIGs = Big Box, Big Tech, Corporate monopolies, everything Big.


    Rx = Big Pharma, Both legal and illegal drug cartels
.

    MIC3 aka 3m = (1) Military Industrial Complex, (2) Media Industrial Complex, (3) Medical Industrial Complex
.

    BLM/R = Burn Loot Murder and Rape of white Christian culture by lawless blacks and their kosher Antifa armies of anarchists, supported and funded by Big Bagel Nose.

  219. @Commentator Mike

    Her website has suddenly disappeared without any explanation. In one of her last posts she seemed very depressive. I fear the worst.

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  220. gay troll says:
    @Poco

    Shut up, isn’t Christ a translation of Messiah which means “King of the Jews”? The Jewish Bible is the indispensable preface to Christianity. “Jesus” is one of the most famous characters in the Old Testament (Jesus is the Greek translation of Joshua). “Jesus Christ” literally means “King Josh” and he identifies himself with the Jews, over and over again, in the Gospels. They are his people and he is their prophesied king. If you worship Jesus Christ then you worship the king of the Jews. You await the celestial Zion. But you want to disclaim the Judeo rootstock of Christianity? It’s not possible. You will forever be a hypocrite if you insist on this nonsense.

    Christianity was invented by a Jew named Paul. Paul says he learned about Jesus Christ by reading the Jewish Bible. Paul says he is the architect of the new religion; he says he is in the pain of labor as he gives birth to it. The gospels were written a generation later. Jesus Christ is a purely literary figure.

    • Disagree: Emslander
    • Replies: @Poco
    , @Poco
    , @Emslander
  221. Cowboy says:
    @3g4me

    I don’t believe it’s fair to say my use of collectivism is dishonest. In fact, I would say the gist of your comment was collectivist over individual.
    Sure we live in a society with some organic social conventions but the organic is dying and being replaced with group think. Wars are being fought over the monopolization of the dollar. We now have American political prisoners being held without cause and in violation of their constitution rights to a speedy trial. We just went through a massive attempt to put all health decisions in the hands of technocratic elites beholden to giant pharmaceutical companies.
    Perhaps those are simple facts but there seems to be a thread…

  222. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    The Epitaph on the Tombstone for Mankind…

    * MANKIND *

    Died 2022

    Cause?

    Could not be allowed to tell the Truth about The Jews

  223. anon[188] • Disclaimer says:

    “In making these claims, Weigel must surely know that President Zelensky has called for volunteers to take up their AK-47s and … ”
    Not exactly, Zelensky introduced conscription for every Ukrainian male between the ages of 18 and 60 to fight for his cause and to save his own ass from the vengeance of millions of Ukranians.

  224. Rich says:
    @littlereddot

    Whether or not one has a son, grandson or great grandson who becomes a homosexual, the rectum is not a sex organ. That alone proves male homosexuality is unnatural. It’s possible to have sympathy with someone afflicted with this mental disorder, but that doesn’t make the disorder normal or acceptable.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  225. Richard B says:
    @Dan-0-lee

    Unite the Right did nothing wrong at Charlottesville; it was the other side who broke the rules of civilised protest.

    Yet another person who grasps the situation while totally missing the point. And the point is, the other side is at war with civilization itself. Of course they’re going to break the rules of civilized protest!

    It’s hard to feel sorry for people so pathologically naive and incurably gullible. Then again, UTR always smelled kosher. And even if it wasn’t it might as well have been.

    Concerning the article, it’s about a White Nationalist who supports The Gay Disco and is written by a man who claims that, racially speaking, White is an empty category. Talk about graspng the situation while totally missing the point.

    The point in this case is that Jewish Supremacy Inc. most definitely sees Whites as a valid category with both range and attributes. In short, they know exactly who they are targeting for destruction.

    And that obvious and easily verifiable fact is all that should matter to Whites! A category, moreover, that includes both Greg Johnson and E. Michael Jones.

  226. American Bryan Rigg has documented the Jewish ancestry of more than 1,200 of Hitler’s soldiers, including two field marshals and 10 generals, “men commanding up to 100,000 troops.” In about 20 cases, soldiers of Jewish heritage were awarded the Knight’s Cross, Germany’s highest military honor, he said. There are different people in every nation.

  227. Amon says:

    In my case the answer is no

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  228. @Father Coughlin

    I don’t like Jones’ metaphor of the gay disco. He shows his age.

    gay disco…faggot bazaar…secular sauna….i happen to be younger, and love the metaphor. it sums it up perfectly. a bunch of old zog men who grew up in the disco era, sending a bunch of young zog mumble rap boys (too yung and stoopid to know how gay disco really is) to go die in the gay disco. those old guys gotta keep that party ball spinnin somehow!

  229. Poco says:
    @gay troll

    Shut up. Sue Dungheap was talking about the fall of Rome. Everything I said about it and the judeo part of it is true.

    In Europe, once Christianity was established the major differential was, are you christian or are you a jew. They did not hail each other as fellow judeochristians. Back to taking the dong up the rectum gay troll and keep quiet.

    There was no conflating of jews and Christians by jews either. So sorry.

  230. Exile says:
    @Løvstuhagen

    Homosexuality isn’t a primarily religious issue – it’s a social and criminal problem.

    The only reason Greg Johnson advocates for tolerance of homosexuals in White Nationalism is because he’s a homosexual who wants to be tolerated.

    He pretzels his politics to ensure that homosexuality is somehow not only a tolerable thing but a net plus – because he wants more gay guys to be gay with.

    Simple as.

    Religion can be a contentious issue in White identity politics, but not because it makes us intolerant toward gays.

    Straight Christians, pagans and fedoras agree that homosexuals are not welcome, for whatever reason you care to cite.

    If anything, being anti-homo promotes unity.

  231. Poco says:
    @gay troll

    Yeah I’ve met a lot of jews who said, “if those Christians would just worship Jesus as the king of jews harder they could be more like us.” The rootstock is a rejection of jewishness. Clown.

  232. Exile says:
    @littlereddot

    The best way to find out is to have a gay son or grandson. Then one is really invested to find out the truth to its final satisfaction. One then cannot rely on trite arguments or cultural bias.

    Or one is invested in finding copes that relieve others of any responsibility for grooming their children or letting it happen.

    Truth and satisfaction aren’t necessarily the same thing and there are tons of people deeply invested in selling you what you want to hear on this issue.

    There is an overwhelming likelihood that your “gay son or grandson” is either the victim of grooming/molestation or has been gaslit by society to believe that homosexuality is an empowering status upgrade rather than an express hellride to suicide, drug addiction and self-abuse.

    The older, pre-Woke-era science on this was pretty clear about deviant fantasy and deviant behavior. Then the agendas muscled in.

    • Agree: Rich
  233. @gay troll

    lol i knew you were gay. not a troll.

    homosex good; Jesus bad. got it…

  234. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Thanks. I thought it was a problem with the website but there have been no new posts from her on other websites she used to contribute to like thetruthseeker.co.uk.

  235. @Commentator Mike

    Search engines are useless and the Internet is dead. There used to be so many articles and info that I used to easily get to on google with a couple of words but they no longer appear and I’m now being offered the exact opposite of what I’m trying to find.

    Six months ago I would still have replied that pessimism had got the best of you, that you simply had to persevere through three or four pages of garbage results to get to some useful data or other information.

    Several recent searches using the term “covid hoax” and employing four different search engines, however, produced so little in the way of unfiltered results—not even a single reference, ten pages in, to articles by Paul Craig Roberts or Andrew Anglin!—have persuaded me that you are right and I was wrong. Pessimism has become simply another name for realism.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  236. @Peter D. Bredon

    homosexuality….then why does Jesus never mention it?

    because nobody.cares.about.fags.then.like.nobody.cares.about.fags.now…
    besides wasn’t he hanging out with hot hookers n shiet?

    fags are the people the put their own assholes above everyone else, promote assholes above all else, and make issues descend into arguments about gay sex.

    homosexuality is counter-civilization. it doesn’t matter how many or how few gay amazing artists there are. homosexuality is counter-civilization. needs to be said.

  237. Emslander says:
    @gay troll

    Jesus is a Jew as is his mother, Mary. He’s the incarnation of the Son of God, second person of the Trinitarian godhead.

    Jesus, or Joshua, is translated as Savior. Christ means the anointed one. Chrism is holy oil.

    If you’re going to hate something, at least know what it is you’re hating.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
    , @gay troll
  238. GeneralRipper [AKA "GKWillie"] says:
    @Rich

    Whether or not one has a son, grandson or great grandson who becomes a homosexual, the rectum is not a sex organ. That alone proves male homosexuality is unnatural. It’s possible to have sympathy with someone afflicted with this mental disorder, but that doesn’t make the disorder normal or acceptable.

    Exactly.

    IIRC, the American Psychiatric Association still classified homosexuality as a mental illness up until 1975.

    • Agree: Rich
  239. geokat62 says:

    Are the White Boys Willing to Die in Defense of the Gay Disco?

    More appropriate title…

    “Are the White Goys Willing to Die in Defense of the Gay Disco?”

  240. @gay troll

    “WhY DInD’t JEsuS TAlK AbOUt BanGinG HolES!”

    hey gay troll, who touched you? who groomed you?

    (it wasn’t Jesus, so don’t blame him, you fag)

    you protestants try and read the bible literally, but you literally have giant gaping holes you tore out of your bible a long time ago. that’s why it’s so hard for you.

    (you can’t read)

  241. @Kurt Knispel

    chore = scrub the floor; dance
    core = kern, kernel, apple core

    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  242. Anonymous[168] • Disclaimer says:

    Homosexuality isn’t the same thing as anal sex. According to surveys, a large minority (around a quarter to a third) of gay men don’t even like it.

    Also, anyone who seriously thinks any modern wars are really about “gay rights” is an absolute moron whose opinion on everything else should be discounted. It’s the same as thinking that the Iraq War was a good-hearted blunder that was literally about “freedom and democracy.” Its simply a PR scam to portray our allies as on the side of “progress” and “human rights.”

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  243. Corvinus says:

    “One of the most puzzling features of the current war in the Ukraine is the alliance between Jews and Nasis”

    False narrative. I thought men of the cloth are not supposed to purposely engage in deceit.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  244. @Emslander

    Emslander,

    Just for the record the Father is the Holy Spirit and on the mothers side Mary was conceived without sin (Jesus gives his mother the name Eve had before the first sin from the cross) so there is no sinful Jewish or human DNA (if you wish to frame it in genetics). Please do not class Jesus and his Mother amongst the people who disgrace the divine today.

    • Replies: @Emslander
    , @gay troll
  245. @Mick Jagger Gathers No Mosque

    The ancients were smart, but they surely were whacky!

  246. Appreciate the historical background on Ukraine the author provides. Understanding the war in Ukraine means grasping the role played by Jewish cultism, which has plagued all of Europe.

    • Agree: 3g4me
  247. GeneralRipper [AKA "GKWillie"] says:
    @Karl Franz

    Bowing to tyrants lets the worst examples of humanity rule the world.

    The worst, tyrannical examples of humanity already are ruling the world. As a young white man, it’s certainly admirable that you have the will to fight for something. You just need to get your head out of your ass and figure out which side is just.

    Good luck.

  248. anon[107] • Disclaimer says:

    It’s amazing how so many people get so much anger out of a book and a man I’m told repeatedly is about LOVE. So a religion for the masses, for the gentiles to worship a Jewish man but who looks incredibly white when tortured and nailed to a cross. Beaten and hated at every step. Drag him through the mud, make any and all accusations. Rape him his wife and force him to drag his children through the mud. Beat him, all of them, his family when he refuses when his words never change generation after generation he never bows to them and his words just keep ringing through-out their ears no matter what they do.
    I can see how Jesus and his disciples were modeled after Jacob’s family, but Jesus a Jew? Can’t see it.

  249. @Anonymous

    Well……there are solid reasons why we call the NWO “Globohomo.”

    While you’re right that conflicts are generally about other things as well, it’s uncanny how often the two sides can be distinguished by their stand on anal sex……and I’m guessing that it has something to do with the tendency toward small hat perversity.

  250. Emslander says:
    @Jack McArthur

    Please do not class Jesus and his Mother amongst the people who disgrace the divine today.

    The Holy Trinity, the human and divine nature of Jesus and the role of Mary as Mother of God are deep mysteries that certainly aren’t open to full human understanding.

    Having said that, I believe, as a Roman Catholic, that the humanity of Christ is every bit as real as is His Divinity. This matter has been the subject of divisions within Christianity since the first century AD, but, if Christ is fully human and His mother is fully human, though conceived without sin, then the fact that they practiced Judaism while on earth makes them both Jews. Christ presided at the Seder supper the night before He died.

    I also don’t see how you can say that the Father is the Holy Spirit. My understanding of the Trinity is that the Father and the Holy Spirit are two separate Persons.

    You say that you don’t believe that Jesus and Mary ought to be corrupted by being considered Jews, but it might just as easily be said that He ought not be corrupted by the DNA of any human being, since we’re all sinners. Nevertheless, that’s what His Father asked Him to do, become human.

    I hope that none of this is taken as being hostile toward you or your comment. These are profound mysteries, but I think that the formula as I’ve stated is the correct way to put them into language.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
    , @Sue Dunham
  251. If everybody in Ukraine from so-called nazis to Jews to gays to democrats don’t want the Russian Army there, that should be a good hint for Putin and E.M. Jones. Good Catholic that he is, EMJ should know something about “just war doctrine”. To launch a war there must be a just cause. Ukraine is NO threat to Putin and his 6,000 nukes. In fact, in all the history of war – with the exception of some of the GAE’s wars – no country has been LESS of a threat to another than Ukraine is to Russia. Even possessing the ultimate weapon (that his opponent doesn’t have), Putin launched his slaughter and has convinced some pious Catholics that he is the good guy. Btw, in Putin’s sh*thole state media, there are apparently no shortage of gay entertainers.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Anon
  252. gay troll says:
    @Jack McArthur

    Lol, don’t you people get it? If Jesus is not the son of Joseph, if Jesus is not a Jew, then he is NOT ELIGIBLE to be the Messiah of prophecy. If Jesus’s dad was a holy wind, then he CANNOT be “Christ”. Christ is not a name! It is a title reserved for YHWH’s chosen king.

    Yet in the Gospels, Jesus rejects the covenant between Yahweh and the Jews. He calls the Jews of his generation evil and says their father is the devil. He says he has only come to preach to the wicked; that the righteous have no need for his teachings. Isaiah said the son of a virgin would enable the Jews to establish Zion and rule the nations. But Jesus Christ only prepares the Jews for defeat at the hands of Rome. The book of Matthew is a blackly humorous satire! Jesus does the opposite of what the Mashiach would be expected to do.

    Why? Matthew is based on Mark, which although not blackly humorous, is nevertheless a highly contrived parable. Mark was written after Titus destroyed the Temple in Jerusalem; this is how Jesus can “predict” the end of days in such detail. Jesus promised that the Son of Man would descend within a generation of his crucifiction. Titus marked 40 years on the dot. Titus left not one stone of the Temple set upon another. Mark is a pro Roman adaptation of the Pauline epistles.

    As for Paul, he spells everything out. He tells you exactly what Christianity was in the beginning. He says he laid the foundation of Christianity. He says that Christianity is a way to exchange the spiritual blessings of the Jews for the material blessings of the Gentiles. He boasts of saying anything to anyone to get what he wants: usually a hot meal and a donation for the Temple in Jerusalem. Paul claims of learning from the Jewish Bible (which was originally published in Greek), that the Messiah came down from Heaven and not from Earth, and that Zion only exists in heaven, where all the Jewish prophecies have been fulfilled. Paul says Christianity offers the invisible and nonsensical. He wasn’t kidding.

    As a Jew it is no surprise that Paul is also a raving homophone and misogynist. The fact that Jesus Christ becomes a “celibate” feminist in Matthew (was he born eunuch or did he make himself that way? Rabbis were allowed to get married) only goes to show once again that the Gospels contradict many of the basic beliefs and values of Paul. They are in fact designed to supersede Paul. But as Paul sagely warned, anyone who built on his foundation would have their work tested by fire.

    Homophobia is consecrated by the Jewish Bible. Paul embodies it. Yet according to Matthew, the Jews of Jesus’ day were evil, and their laws needed to be radically amended by the son of Zeus. The conclusion here is that “evil Jew” and “Christian” are actually synonymous. All those of you Christians who cherish your homophobia, just keep following the teachings of Jesus Christ, you’ll be trodden underfoot and dispatched to Heaven before you know it.

    And for those of you Christians who have genuinely pure hearts, and genuinely believe in the golden rule, you should all become yogis, or Buddhas, or white magicians, and start approaching every single part of the Bible as politically motivated fiction.

    Hairy Kristna!
    Hail Lucifer (the Morning Star)
    Praise Enki
    and Namaste.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
    , @HeebHunter
  253. @Pierre de Craon

    As a case in point try entering the site I just mentioned thetruthseeker.co.uk into google and see what you get. Then do as Franklin recommended and enter same into the yandex search box (it will appear when you go to the yandex site and don’t need to download it). Impossible to get to it through google, first on the list in yandex.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  254. @Corvinus

    Oh I love it when people say it can’t be the Nazis because Zelensky is a Jew. Yeah well they’re all just screaming out loud, all the Western msm from CNN to whoever “It’s the Jews!”. Smart that Putin, he doesn’t need to say it himself, his enemies are all doing it for him. Tons of laughs.

  255. @Frank Walus

    You don’t have any idea what you are talking about.

  256. Miro23 says:
    @Priss Factor

    The problem is the celebration of homosexuality, especially for straight people. Accepting the fact that some people are born homo and tolerating their behavior as long as they keep it in their sphere is not the problem. The problem is mandating globo-homo as a kinda neo-religion for everyone. That is sicko idolatry.

    Same with BLM. Blacks can be useful members of society – but not when they’re forced into education and employment they can’t handle to advance a national White Guilt race war narrative.

    These issues are selected and inflamed (among many others) specifically for their usefulness in attacking /breaking down Anglo US culture. Any activity or opinion that will upset an Anglo US traditionalist is on the Jewish race war agenda for priority activism.

    So , it’s not that Jews love homosexuals, Blacks, transvestite children’s hour or wall to wall porn. It’s just that they hate Europeans as people (but still emulate and marry them – which raises some other issues) and want to ruin and destroy them in the US by any means available.

    Jews have had habit of doing this to every host social structure they encounter – not just European.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  257. Anon[303] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    “tolerating their behavior as long as they keep it in their sphere”

    Define their sphere.

    They consider literally everywhere as their sphere, including pre-school.

    Priss, you are a superannuated 1990s-style paleoconservative. The kind who is fond of declaring, for liberal brownie points, that anal “marriage” is part of “the blessings of liberty” because “it doesn’t affect anyone else.” The problem is that reality has overtaken you.

    Or perhaps you yourself are a closeted homosexual? In the interest of full disclosure, will you say if you have a dog in this fight?

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Mike Tre
  258. gay troll says:
    @Emslander

    Christ means the anointed one.

    In Greek, sure, but “Christ” was used in translation for the Hebrew word Messiah or Mashiach. What does Messiah mean? Not simply anointed. A Messiah is YHWH’s chosen King on Earth. David was a Messiah, and so was Cyrus. This is why “King of the Jews” is hung above Jesus’ head. It’s the punchline of the joke.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper


  259. Video Link

    Vince breaks it down for you.

  260. Anon[303] • Disclaimer says:
    @Frank Walus

    Not everyone in the Ukraine wants the Russians out. The truth is that the NATO-supporting regime is ruling against the will of the majority of the population, and even shelling civilians in the eastern part of the country, and it has been doing so for eight bloody years, killing 15,000 ethnic Russians, the equivalent of about five 9-11s. If the Russian Federation’s special military operation doesn’t comport with just war theory, then nothing does.

    • Thanks: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Frank Walus
  261. @Priss Factor

    “Because it was misunderstood. Religious people(who believe in non-existent god) just obeyed sacred texts. Using that logic, it was also right to burn ‘witches’ and go after heretics like Galileo.”

    No,that’s your modern interpretation of what they did. There’s a reason why those “sacred texts” existed. When you hear that a man is gay,why is the first instinct of most healthy people “Oh,this dude is going to molest my children”? Is it because it’s written down in some “sacred text” that people naively and blindly adhere to? No. As far as I know,that notion doesn’t appear in ANY religious text. It’s based on OBSERVED BEHAVIOR. That’s the same thing the religious texts based the notion that gays were metaphysically evil on-their observed behavior of directly and aggressively transgressing against the natural morality of all of mankind. And not just in their unnatural and unclean butthole sex,either.

    “Among the scientific community, there was an idea that homosexuality was something acquired through childhood trauma. So, it’s an acute pathology that can be treated via medicine or psychotherapy. It was flawed science.”

    Oh,it’s flawed science,is it? Well,I’ve got an interesting scientific extrapolation for you. And this is something that is based entirely in math. You can’t insert a value judgement here,it’s pure numbers. Look up a random cross-section of serial killers who were involved in necrophilia and/or bestiality and/or incest and/or cannibalism and cross-reference it with history of homosexual behavior,compare the representation of homosexuals vs heterosexuals you find there. Then let’s talk about “flawed science”. This is science that is so well-known that it forms the bedrock of criminal psychological profiling and is used by just about every professional in that endeavor that you can name.

    “Modern world cannot rely on religious texts. It is based on reason and science. And proper understanding of reason and science should convince honest people that some people are BORN homo, therefore it shouldn’t be criminal to be one.”

    No one is born homo. In fact,I daresay that when you are born,you don’t have a sexual orientation towards anything. Your brain has to grow and develop a bit before you acquire any type of sexuality. Everyone I went to kindergarten with thought that girls were lame and stupid. The girls seemed to think that boys were annoying and violent. None of them turned out homo,either. It’s because no one was sexually attracted to anything at 5 or 6 years old. You can be born neurologically and psychologically,maybe even physiologically damaged in such a way that you are inclined to develop a homosexual paraphilia later on,along with perhaps an interest in necrophilia,bestiality, cannibalism or pedophilia as these things tend to go, but nobody is born with their penis rammed up another boy’s anus.

    The act of homosexual intercourse should be a death penalty offense based on the prudent criminal wisdom that harshly punishing a criminal who commits a burglary will prevent a murder later on down the road when he finds the occupants of a home he is robbing unwilling to part with their goods. Homosexuals should be identified early on by the hormonal imbalances and psychological issues they typically exhibit as children or during puberty and every effort should be made to rehabilitate them and prevent them from engaging in any of the aberrant behaviors associated with homosexuality but if they go on to commit crimes against nature,proving that they are not capable of psychologically controlling their proclivities for pedophilia and other more serious crimes,they should be legally tried and executed to prevent more heinous crimes later on.

    And I don’t follow a religion.

    “Are the White Boys Willing to Die in Defense of the Gay Disco?”

    Spoiler Alert:No. Let the Negroes and Jews have the glory of dying in this pointless war.

  262. @raga10

    Drinking, dancing, and finding someone to put his penis into your feces. Yes that sounds like fun. You’re not mentally ill at all.

    Or were you allegedly a non-sodomite for some reason hanging out in those bars?

    As for neo-Nazis, they are not an official recognized, taxpayer-funded and -trained and -armed part of Russian government and military. They ARE such a part of the ukrainian military, and apparently not a negligible one. But you already knew that and were just spouting some what-about-ism that doesn’t even apply.

    • Replies: @raga10
  263. @Amon

    Smart man. The answer is also HELL NO for our sons.

  264. @Anon

    For starters, the 15,000 dead in shelling by Ukraine is a number provided by Putin. Evidence of its voracity is hard to come by. The number is quoted by Russia fans, but the number killed by shelling in the other direction is apparently of no consequence. Also, the gov’t of Ukraine – and most of the world – considers the breakaway provinces to be part of UKRAINE. How many gov’ts in the world would allow rebels to take territory without trying to win it back? And why can’t they take it back? Because Russia poured a bunch of weapons in there.

    Russia has more nuclear warheads than any other country. How is Ukraine – with NO nukes – going to threaten Russian sovereignty? Even if Ukraine built 100,000 tanks and lined them up at the border, Russia could turn them into molten lava in no time. Ukraine is a signatory to the NPT.

    Putin has the ultimate weapon – one that his adversary does not have. Putin has a weapon against his adversary that few armies in recorded history could ever boast, a weapon that keeps his nation from ever being invaded (until they find an antidote for nukes). Yet he sends his army crashing into Ukraine, killing and destroying – not a just war.

    • Replies: @Anon
  265. @Anon

    I think Priss might actually be a female…..

    https://dailyandreaostrov.blogspot.com/

    In any case, to a certain extent, I agree that if gays leave me alone, then I have no problem with them, and this has been my lifelong attitude. Live and let live.

    However….we have reached peak homo/tranny thanks to organized jewry, and now we are supposed to not only celebrate anal sex, but encourage our children to take part in it…..and maybe even chop off some body parts just for the hell of it.

    The tranny shit is demonic.

    All of it is designed to erode the white birth rate, wreck the nuclear family, and create misery.

  266. Mike Tre says:
    @Anon

    I don’t agree. Priss Factor is a closet negro worshiping, white hating, homosexual affirming windbag. Not exactly Pat Buchanan.

  267. @Truth

    Do you really believe what you wrote ?!…Russia want to eliminate as much possibly, the civilian casualty…because what President Putin said it’s true: they are ‘ brothers ‘…about one thousand years of common history, with what’s coming along…good and bad…If you believe what you say, go and ‘ walk the walk ‘…Zelensky & Co. are asking for ‘ volunteers ‘…At my age, I strongly believe in the power of example…here is the rifle, man/women 🙂

  268. TheMoon says:

    It’s increasingly harder to feel any unity with my fellow whites when they let themselves be hypnotized for decades by Jewish media, and wallow in their existential fear of being called racist to the point of dooming their grandchildren to being a persecuted minority in their own homelands.

    And then everyone calls them racist anyway. And they wonder why everyone 30 and under (and not indoctrinated by the shit school system the retards sat back and watched get subverted) spits venom at them at every opportunity.

  269. GeneralRipper [AKA "GKWillie"] says:
    @gay troll

    Christianity flourished, and in turn Christian Civilization became the greatest in recorded history precisely because it is an innately sane way to live. Fierce pagan nations ultimately recognized the Divine truth inherent in it.

    Christianity not only makes sense of suffering, it ennobles and transforms it.

    Suffering is the human condition. The ultra wealthy, the dirt poor and everyone in between suffers in this vale of tears.

    No creature gets off this rock without suffering.

    Homosexuals are essentially little boys who can’t stop playing with themselves and take on the responsibility of manhood.

    The whole of man’s history has been the story of dour combat with the powers of evil, stretching, so our Lord tells us, from the very dawn of history until the last day. Finding himself in the midst of the battlefield, man has to struggle to do what is right, and it is at great cost to himself, and aided by God’s grace, that he succeeds in achieving his own inner integrity

    http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p1s2c1p7.htm

    • Thanks: Towey, Poco
    • Replies: @Exile
  270. @Emslander

    Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit according to the bible. He was untainted by any stain of sin so he could not inherit sinful flesh from his mother either – “the rebellion of the “flesh” against the “spirit””. He came in the likeness of flesh, i.e. he was human, but not in sinful flesh or as I put it “so there is no sinful Jewish or human DNA”. Jesus transformed Jewish ritual and was rejected by Jews then and now for doing so. Jews who did accept Jesus then and now became Christians not the judeo-christians of today.

  271. @gay troll

    There is so much ill will in your post that it reads like a person at war with himself.

    • Replies: @Sue Dunham
  272. @Emslander

    I also don’t see how you can say that the Father is the Holy Spirit. My understanding of the Trinity is that the Father and the Holy Spirit are two separate Persons.

    LOL, have you gotten past page one of the NT or do you just believe whatever your bishops tell you?

    “His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit.”

    -Matthew 1:18

    • Replies: @Emslander
    , @Hibernian
  273. Are White 18 year old Russians willing to fight for a loser dictator with Napolean syndrome?

    Looks like they don’t much of a choice.

    Nothing says honorable fight like lying to 18 year old conscripts and sending them into a war in 1970s equipment.

    Not really sure how you are sticking it to gays and Jews by sending in straight non-Jewish 18 year olds to the front. Nothing scares the Jews like killing thousands of non-Jews. Some real brain trust strategists here at Unz.

    This war won’t do anything to change the global status quo. If anything NATO spending will increase and Putin will look like a moron as will anyone that defends him.

    Napolean could at least inspire confidence in his men. These Russian soldiers are completely demoralized. Kind of the risk of lying to your own troops.

    Israel will have record growth after this war is over since Putin will be selling them cheap oil and diamonds. I will be right and maybe the Jew haters here will re-think the inane position that war between White countries somehow punishes the Jews. What a joke.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Exile
  274. @Jack McArthur

    It’s not my ill will. It is Jesus himself who says his teachings are only for evil Jews. I am just telling you people what the New Testament actually says…

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
    , @Poco
  275. Richard B says:
    @Miro23

    Jews have had habit of doing this to every host social structure they encounter – not just European.

    Absolutely!

    That would explain the quote from You Gentiles by Maurice Samuel that I first came across while reading Douglas Reed’s The Controversy of Zion (available at TUR).

    “We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build. . . . The wretched fate which scattered us through your midst has thrust this unwelcome role upon us.”

    A better example of The Dark Triad (lust for power, narcissism, and psychopathology) would be hard to imagine.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_Gentiles
    https://www.unz.com/book/douglas_reed__the-controversy-of-zion/

    • Replies: @Richard B
  276. @Verymuchalive

    Adolf Hitler was the greatest statesman of the 20th century, among the finest leaders in human history, and the last hero of Western Civilization.

    You should show some respect.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  277. Richard B says:
    @Richard B

    Notice, by the way, that in the Maurice Samuel quote he blames fate, while Jewish Supremacy Inc. blames whites. Obviously the explanation for the insanity is properly located in the culture. Their culture.

    Hence their addiction to scapegoating and projection. After all, and speaking of culture, they invented the scapegoat, literally.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  278. @John Johnson

    WTF are you going on about dipshit?

    Show me where any of us has said that a war between white countries punishes the jews.

    None of us wanted another brother war engineered by conniving jews.

    Clearly, NATO and the dirty jew leading Ukraine are willing to fight Russia down to the last Ukrainian.

    Obviously , the entire crew here at UNZ understands exactly what is going on…..you are interjecting whacko bullshit.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  279. @Robert Dolan

    I think Priss might actually be a female…..

    https://dailyandreaostrov.blogspot.com/

    Yes, almost certainly. Well spotted.

    Andrea Ostrov Letania, using this name and at least one other, has been posting extremely long comments at TOO since at least 2014, perhaps longer.* The style of those comments is identical to what can be seen here: repetitious, padded with overfamiliar generalities and references to crummy movies, and exhibiting a taste for off-the-wall hypothesizing in preference to connecting the dots between (1) what is known to have been Jewish activity at a given time or place in the past and (2) what certainly seems like Jewish activity in the here and now.

    To my taste (others will disagree), the most irritating aspect of Letania’s style is, not her penchant for excessive length, but her addiction to filling her comments and articles with freshly coined memes and initialisms that serve no useful purpose. Here’s an example: “People have to learn that the problem is JEASWID: Jews Everywhere Are Stealing White Infants’ Diapers! Until we stop JEASWID, our newborns will never be safe.”

    OK, I admit that she hasn’t actually written those sentences yet, but don’t say you weren’t warned. [wink]

    Where do she and other million-word-a-day writers/commenters find the time to grind out this stuff, given that none of it pays the mortgage or feeds the family? It has already taken me twenty minutes to think through, type out, and edit this comment alone—and I’m not finished yet!—and my long comment higher up the thread (no. 193) ate up three hours yesterday before I felt it was fit to face the world. I suppose it helps to be unaware that the wheel has already been invented.
    ____________
    *Perhaps a quarter of her comments there fail to get published. I know that to be so because Dr. McDonald’s moderator will sometimes say flat out that a comment isn’t being published because of its irrelevance or excessive length.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @James Forrestal
  280. @Robert Dolan

    Show me where any of us has said that a war between white countries punishes the jews.

    None of us wanted another brother war engineered by conniving jews.

    This isn’t a war engineered by Jews.

    This is a war engineered by Putin and Jones is a defender of his BS.

    Let’s take this tidbit:

    The country we call Ukraine is a land of constantly shifting borders which only became an independent country in 1991.

    False. An independent Ukraine was declared before the Bolsheviks took them over.

    Also not mentioned is the 1994 Budapest convention where Russia agreed to recognize the borders of Ukraine and that included Crimea:
    https://policymemos.hks.harvard.edu/links/ukraine-budapest-memorandum-1994

    Of course no journalist in Russia would dare ask Putin about the Budapest convention. Putin is a total loser that can’t handle an open press or internet.

    Putin is the cause of this war and can end this war at any moment. It was not caused by Jews.

    Putin in fact likes the Jews as seen by the fact that he is happy to sell them oil and diamonds.

    Clearly, NATO and the dirty jew leading Ukraine are willing to fight Russia down to the last Ukrainian.

    A basic refresher for you:
    Ukraine is not in NATO.
    Ukraine does not qualify for NATO.
    Ukraine has not applied for NATO.
    NATO has stated that they are not interested in Ukraine.
    Putin did not make any demands related to NATO before invading.

    Now do tell how NATO is to blame and how the best move to undermine NATO was to invade a non-NATO country and assure nearby countries like Poland that they did the right thing by joining.

    This war is stupid and even Putin doesn’t have a consistent explanation. No one can ask him less they risk 15 years in prison.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  281. @Richard B

    It is the nature of the Talmudic “God” they believe in who is not the same as the Christian “God”.

    You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies (John 8:44)

    If you quote that passage it is maybe well to attach the above passage even if you don’t believe it to avoid misleading innocents or fueling the ire of axe grinders who hate Christ and Christians.

    Atonement through sacrifice has ancient precursors. A heart full of love can be the driving spirit when a person lays down their life for another.

  282. Exile says:
    @John Johnson

    Doing armchair psychoanalysis of Vladimir Putin or Russian soldiers based on what you’ve read in media, GAYTO or Russian-based, is deeply Jewish.

    “Authoritarian Personality” tier.

  283. Exile says:
    @GeneralRipper

    It’s more accurate to say that fierce pagans were battered and bribed into Christianity by centuries of warfare and the Faustian temptations of “Christian civilization.”

    But you’re still right about gays.

  284. @Jack McArthur

    Yes, this is my Psue Donym. The “great commission” is pretty threadbare. It is literally a post script to Mark, an afterthought at best, and possibly an interpolation. Jesus says here that those who believe in him will be able to drink deadly poison and not be harmed. How strong is your faith? Would you care to demonstrate?

    Furthermore, the great commission is a necessary bridge from the Gospels to Paul, since Paul preaches to the goyim. But Paul was written first. The idea that the letters of Paul were written after the events described in the Gospels is a pure fantasy. Here is one of the keys to understanding the NT as multiple layers of literatures that have been arranged anachronistically.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  285. @Sue Dunham

    You appear to have a tendency to make a strong claim then when somebody refutes it you either ignore it or dismiss with it with sleight of hand and then raise several other points which has the effect, if not the intent, of masking the original error you made.

    I do not detect a spirit of truth at work in you but somebody who is trying to convince themself over a problem conscience and needs other people to affirm it and doing so in an aggressive manner.

    To any sincere person reading this who seeks an answer to the question “did Jesus preach only for the benefit of Jews”, in addition the answer already given in the previous post, then this article should help:
    https://www.ncregister.com/blog/did-jesus-heal-and-preach-to-only-jews-no

  286. @Jack McArthur

    Well…I’ll weigh in, though I am not a Bible scholar, my take is that Christ was rejected by his own, so at that point God opened salvation to the gentiles….all of mankind.

    Yes, His original intent was to minister to the jews specifically, but obviously that didn’t pan out, and from the looks of it, it’s going to take The Lake of Fire to motivate the very stubborn small hats.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  287. Sendejo says:
    @Been_there_done_that

    coup d’etat : a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics
    especially : the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group

    Just because you are unaware of the definition of coup d’etat doesn’t mean there was no coup d’etat.

    There was a general uprising across Ukraine, but particularly in the West, that forced Ukraine President Yanukovych to flee.

    Nuland wasn’t at the Munich Security Conference in early 2014 because she was busy inciting a violent coup in Kiev; just as she aided Strobe Talbot in dismembering Yugoslavia.

    If you followed events at the time, as you say, why don’t you know better what transpired? Are you propagating misinformation? Or, are you really that dumb?

    Get a clue!

    • Replies: @Been_there_done_that
  288. Sarah says:
    @Priss Factor

    Or take pre-marital sex. Stats suggest its effect is mostly bad,

    Do you have any studies on this subject ?

    but should it be made illegal?
    The real problems is it’s been normalized, even promoted, to the point where those who insist on sex after marriage are mocked and ridiculed.

    The problem is about power than freedom. Homosexuality is legal in Russia, but the Power there will not allow its promotion as the New Normal. But the Power in the West is Jewish, and it promotes that stuff to subvert the goy world

    Judaism forbids it. It is expressly stated in the Torah.

    Or take tattoos. I hate it but don’t think it should be illegal. But the Power in the West decided to promote it, and so many young ones got ugly tattoos, something only few people used to do. And the Power perverted laws so that companies cannot fire people with gross tattoos and green hair.

    Judaism forbids tattoes, and more generally this kind of irreversible and harmful modification to the body. It is expressly stated in the Torah.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Poco
  289. @Jack McArthur

    No, I am writing in good faith, and you are in denial.

    Jesus says “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 15:24). Matthew writes he “will save his people from their sins” (1:21) and Jesus says “I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance” (9:13). Jesus explicitly tells his apostles not to preach to the Gentiles (Matthew 10:5). When asked by a Greek woman to heal her daughter, Jesus says only his children (Jews) may eat from the table, while dogs (non Jews) may pick up crumbs off the floor (Mark 7:27). He says “I ever taught in the synagogue and the temple” (John 17:20). He repeats variations of the phrase “no prophet is accepted in his own country” (Luke 4:24). John says “he came unto his own, and his own received him not” (1:11). Jesus is called the King of Israel (John 1:49). Pontius Pilate tells Jesus “thine own nation and chief priests have delivered you” (John 17:35). When a woman of Samaria point out that Jesus is a Jew, he responds “Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship, for salvation is of the Jews” (John 4:22).

    • Thanks: RVBlake
  290. @Jack McArthur

    >Trying to reason with a Christ-hating self admitted literal faggot

    Sigh. Just remind it all societies, Christian and pagan alike, absolutely hated faggets. They deserve only the fire pit and the bog.

    • Replies: @Sue Dunham
  291. @gay troll

    Reminder that faggotism is sterile and death itself. All societies will exterminate you given no amerimutt golem army around to blackmail them with nuclear annihilation.

    • Replies: @Sue Dunham
  292. @Badger Down

    Thanks. (Have no agree butt; sorry, button to agree).

    (I am sloppy with the gangster lingo; should probably end my contempt for anything Jewanglo-Jewmerican incl. the language, since English people (Anglo-Americans) are nice as long as they do not hold an opinion I disapprove of).

  293. @HeebHunter

    Lol, you don’t even try to reason with anybody, all you do is spit your venom.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  294. @HeebHunter

    Keep exterminating us and we’ll keep being born. Nail us to a cross why don’t you? That couldn’t possibly backfire.

  295. geokat62 says:
    @John Johnson

    This isn’t a war engineered by Jews.

    Who is pulling the strings of Zelensky? Who funded his 2019 Presidential campaign? Who is Ihor Kolomoisky?

    Putin is a total loser that can’t handle an open press or internet.

    Excerpt from Vladimir Putin’s February 21, 2022 Speech:

    We responded accordingly, stressing that we are ready to go down the road of negotiations, but on condition that all issues are considered as a package, as a whole, without separating them from the basic Russian proposals. And these contain three important points. The first is the prevention of further NATO enlargement. The second is the refusal to allow the alliance to deploy offensive weapons systems on Russia’s borders. And finally, the return of the bloc’s military capabilities and infrastructure in Europe to where they were in 1997, when the NATO-Russia Founding Act was signed.

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2022/02/22/vladimir-putin-full-text-of-february-21-2022-speech/

    Excerpt Vladimir Putin’s February 24, 2022 Televised Address on Ukraine:

    I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the eastward expansion of NATO, which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-24/full-transcript-vladimir-putin-s-televised-address-to-russia-on-ukraine-feb-24

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  296. The “Daily Stormer” is already off the net again (at least
    in Jewrope). Has Anglin now had his lights switched off?

    Some (very disturbing) “Nazi” news:

    https://www.foxnews.com/world/russia-fines-equating-ussr-nazi

    https://www.newsweek.com/russia-ukraine-mariupol-azov-nazi-1695125

    https://www.politico.com/news/2022/04/06/senate-unanimously-approves-lend-lease-00023668

    https://euromaidanpress.com/2022/04/06/i-am-an-untermensch-ukrainian-writer-responds-to-russias-nazi-manifesto/

    Why do Ukrainian “Nazis” hide their weapons in a synagogue? https://tass.com/defense/1429519

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/06/german-police-raid-neo-nazi-cells-across-country

    P.S. Is it “antisemitic” again to ask why so called “Holocaust survivors” usually become “older than dirt” (even though the catastrophic conditions in the so called “death camps” should have had massive life-shortening after-effects on their health)? https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/holocaust-survivor-inge-deutschkron-dies-99-berlin-83340416

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  297. Why does the Russian army choose as its distinguishing mark
    the Z, of all things, which suggests an association with Zion?

    • Replies: @InnerCynic
  298. Emslander says:
    @Sue Dunham

    LOL, have you gotten past page one of the NT or do you just believe whatever your bishops tell you?

    I do, indeed, believe whatever the Roman Catholic Bishops tell me in matters of Faith or morals.

    The bishops had worked out most of these trinitarian heterodoxies by the end of the fourth century in a series of councils. The Athanasian Creed lays out in detail what the Christian world (Roman Catholic Church) understands of the Trinity.

    I see the reason for your errors in your sneering reference to the New Testament passage cited. The error is easily refuted in elementary discussions of the theology of Christ’s conception.

    Satan never tires of her childish losing battles.

    • Thanks: Towey, Pierre de Craon
    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  299. @Robert Dolan

    Robert, your point seems reasonable to me and can be supported by passages from the bible – especially Paul.

    That being said Jesus declared his divinity with “before Abraham was, I Am” and therefore the rejection of the Jews was not something unexpected, with the offer to the gentiles a improvised response, but was known even before creation began.

    I have my own personal belief based on non Jewish texts millennia before Jesus was born that he was sent as a great mercy to a people who had wandered greatly into legalism and restored what had been lost in spirit.

    Texts from Ancient Egypt to me indicate that when he told the Jews (who claimed Abraham was their Father) “before Abraham was I Am” he was telling the truth.

    My viewpoint is from somewhere on the Nile but with goodwill to all people of goodwill including those who have no belief.

  300. @Sue Dunham

    A decade of trying to reason with kikes, fags, and other hoaxers hardened my heart, praise be the LORD!

    It will be amusing to see how faggot’s get handled in a Mad Max implosion scenario.

  301. @ Sue aka gay troll

    Did you even read the article I linked to?

    What kind of spirit is working in you that instead of radiating the goodness you have found you obsess about attacking Christianity and trying to undermine the faith of other people?

    You are not a good example for anyone but rather an advertisement for another kind of spirit.

    You openly proclaim your are a “troll” and are not acting in good faith. If you had been then maybe you would have gotten pointers that would have given you the peace you so clearly need.

    • Replies: @Sue Dunham
  302. @Peter D. Bredon

    Homophobe? I’d say that lately there’s been an epidemic of “heterophobic” behavior seeing as simply standing up for natural heterosexual marriage and culture are attacked time and time again.

  303. @Foot Soldier

    Maybe its simply easy to see? Or would a bullseye be more appropriate?

  304. @Foot Soldier

    So are Germans rounding up Nazis to send them to the Ukraine as press ganged “volunteers” for the Azov battalion? It’s also quite possible that Western countries are secretly letting out some of the Nazi, terrorist and soldier criminals from prisons to go and fight in the Ukraine. Mercenary recruiters could well be allowed into prisons to recruit.

  305. @Exile

    Maybe that’s why I gave up on American Wymyn. Their bitching and whining were too much. And insulating themselves with effeminate men is pathetic.

  306. anarchyst says:
    @Sarah

    Let’s see…judaism forbids tattoos but has no problem with mutilating the genitals of 8 day old jewish male infants? Male genital mutilation along with the dirty “mohel” introducing his STDs by fellating the infant is OK?
    What’s wrong with this picture?

    • Agree: geokat62
  307. GenFranco says:
    @SimplePseudonymicHandle

    “Maybe American foreign policy has a say in it. They’re allowed to have a say.
    Maybe some Jewish people, on account of some long and legitimate Jewish history in the Ukraine, have a say in it. ”

    This made me chuckle.

  308. Sue Dunham says: • Website
    @Jack McArthur

    Oh please. I am analyzing a book. A work of literature. There is no ill will about it. I am pursuing HISTORICAL TRUTH. You seem to think that the historical truth is that a virgin gave birth to a sorcerer who fulfilled the law and the prophets by warning the Jews that their kingdom would soon be crushed and taken over by Rome? By telling the Jews to dissolve their Earthly bonds and set all their hopes on the afterlife? By rising from the grave and showing off his immortality?

    You believe all this literally happened, not just the political drama, but the miracles? Here’s the thing about “faith” (as you airily describe your attitude): faith does not require a history book to know what is real. Propaganda, on the other hand, does. I am not here attacking your faith, I am attacking A FAKE HISTORY BOOK. If you truly had faith then you would have no need for the Bible. You would have no need to defend it as fact.

    I did read your link and I thought it was rather weak. I have been arguing that the teachings of Jesus Christ in the Gospels are only addressed to Jews. The sermon on the Mount, for example. This is a sermon in which Jesus overturns all Mosaic values. His instructions here, if followed, can lead only to dissolution and death.

    Remember that the evolution of Christianity goes from Isaiah through Paul to the Gospels. Isaiah foresaw that the Jewish messiah would conquer the goyim. Paul wants this prophecy fulfilled, and so he markets Jesus Christ to goyim. But history tells us how Jewish prophecies actually worked out: Titus destroyed Jerusalem in 70 CE. The last remnant of Jewish resistance fell at Masada in 130. The gospels were written in order to sanctify the Roman victory over Judea. Mark was written first, and it obviously contextualizes itself as parable. Furthermore, it is not corroborated by the letters of Paul. Where does Paul describe a wise man or a healer? A virgin mother? Pontius Pilate? Nowhere. Mark is the entire basis for the “life” of Christ.

    And yet neither Paul nor Mark is the beginning of the New Testament! It begins with Matthew. As such, Matthew is the foundation of Christian diegesis. You still have not reckoned with what Jesus says in Matthew, that he has been sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and not to righteous people. Tell me, do you live by the philosophy of the sermon on the mount Are you a sinner in need of salvation?

    Jesus gives his strongest advice to the Jews in his “sermon on the mount”. He says they will be blessed if they are poor in spirit, mourning, or merely meek. He tells them to always agree with their enemy. He tells them not to make promises. He tells them “resist not evil and turn the other cheek” (Matthew 5:39) which is a strange way to redeem a wicked people. He tells them to love their enemies, and so be made perfect. He tells them to gives alms in secret, to pray in a closet, forgive trespassers, and lay up no treasures upon the Earth. He tells them to abandon foresight and trust in providence. He tells them to take no thought for tomorrow (Matthew 6:34). He reminds them that they are evil. He says they must lose their life in order to gain it (Matthew 16:25). He later tells the Jews not to fear killers of the body (Luke 12:4).

    In a sense the Catholics like Emslander actually get it right: the contradictions of scripture should be ignored, and Christians should act like Moses’ chosen people despite everything Jesus says. It helps to use a Bible that none of your parishioners can read, lest they find out what the Bible actually says. Then you get Protestants running around flagellating themselves.

    I am angry at the Bible, it’s true. I am angry precisely because it claims to be the only truth when there are infinite ways to approach the spirit. Belief in the Bible is not freedom; it is bondage. If you are without sin then go be free.

    More in depth analysis at the website linked. “Troll” has more than one meaning you know.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
    , @anarchyst
  309. Poco says:
    @Sue Dunham

    What a scumbag gay sue dungheap troll you are.

  310. Poco says:
    @Sarah

    They forbid a lot of things amongst themselves while profiting from and encouraging those things amongst Gentiles.

  311. Are the Ukrainian Boys Willing to Die for the Jews?

  312. Anon[341] • Disclaimer says:
    @Frank Walus

    The “government” of the Ukraine is a puppet government, installed by the West. You moved the goalposts from the majority’s wanting the Russians out to this puppet government’s (and other governments’) wanting them out.

    The purpose of installing the puppet government is to convert the Ukraine into a launching pad for a NATO invasion of Russia. You have twice mentioned nuclear weapons. NATO’s age-old modus operandi with regard to its vassal states, such as Germany, is to load them with U.S. nuclear weaponry. There is no reason to expect that nuclear weaponry would not also be installed on a new NATO member’s soil; and every intention of bringing the Ukraine into NATO has been roundly declared by the U.S. government for years and up to the present day. In a public statement, U.S. Vice-President Kamala Harris even treated the Ukraine’s joining of NATO as a fait accompli (somewhat prematurely).

    NATO is the aggressor. And recognized worldwide is the fact that the U.S. has broken every agreement it ever made with any nation that made the mistake of trusting it. That mistake will not be made again.

  313. @Sendejo

    …the definition of coup d’etat …

    What happened between November 2013 and February 2014 in Kiev does not meet the definitions of coup d’etat that you cited.

    Months of mass demonstrations are not sudden. The parliamentary vote with an overwhelming majority was not violent, nor was it instituted by a small group.

    You pretended to be lecturing me but of course you necessarily failed to back up your imaginary claims (“Nuland…was busy inciting a violent coup in Kiev“) with proven information because the facts contradict your assertions.

    If you are actually interested in learning more about the circumstances at the time you can check out my comment archives.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  314. Are the White Boys Willing to Die in Defense of the Gay Disco?

    I say:

    The “Gay Disco” stuff is just distractionary crud put out by the JEW/WASP Ruling Class’s corporate propaganda apparatus to irritate and annoy people. When the ruling class and its mass corporate media is politically decapitated, that globohomo stuff will be defenestrated. Six percent federal funds rate will get the ball rolling on ruling class removal.

    White Men and White Women must politically decapitate the evil and treasonous scum in the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire.

    White Core America must politically decapitate the evil anti-White scum that are pushing WHITE GENOCIDE by means of mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION and REFUGEE OVERLOAD.

    E Michael Jones is somewhat pleasant when he is not making nasty and impolite cracks about the departed Sam Francis, but any attacks on Sam Francis are a deal breaker for White Core America and its leadership.

    General George Washington and Andrew Jackson were not Catholics, thank God, and they are our spiritual guides on matters of a political nature. Washington was Anglo-Norman and Jackson was Scotch-Irish and they weren’t some damn ethnic Catholic sonofabitches thinking they have re-invented the wheel like some of the TRAD CATHOLIC FRAUDS who presume to speak for the historic American nation.

    Brawls there will be and brawls there must be, to determine who is going to crush the evil and immoral JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire and until such time as I see Mel Gibson type Catholics sending Pope Tango straight to Hell then I ain’t listening to them no how!

    I thought a “Both Sides The Tweed” truce could prevail between the historic American nation old stockers and the Johnny-Come-Lately ethnic Catholic bastards, but these arrogant E Michael Jones types want all the glory for themselves. Bull-sheetrock! The winner of the blood brawl between the ethnic Catholic overeducated boob types such as E Michael Jones and the Anglo-Celts and Anglo-Normans and Anglo-Saxons will not be the Catholics!

    The victor of that brawl must begin mass expulsions of all members of the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire and the immediate dislodgement of the current owners of all aspects of the mass electronic media and all other media. Jews must not be allowed to own or control any media in any European Christian nation, and the WASPs who own the rest must be financially liquidated and removed from the USA as a lesson to the others.

    The European Christian people of the Historic American Nation who got to this land by wooden ships under sail power and formed the nation must not lose to these Catholic ethnic types who got to a nation already formed. Who the Hell does this ranting baby boomer dope E Michael Jones think he is? I have never seen such Catholic haughty arrogance so brashly displayed as it is done by this damn Jones fellow!

    I like E Michael Jones a lot better when he is attacking the evil and immoral scum in JOG — JEWS ORGANIZED GLOBALLY — rather than making nasty cracks about the great Sam Francis!

    Give ‘Em Hell, E Michael Jones, Just Let Sam Francis Alone!

  315. Anon[341] • Disclaimer says:
    @Robert Dolan

    You wrote:

    “I have no problem with them, and this has been my lifelong attitude. Live and let live.

    “However….we have reached peak homo/tranny thanks to organized jewry, and now we are supposed to not only celebrate anal sex, but encourage our children to take part in it.”

    Perhaps one of these things helps to lead to the other one? That is to say, “live and let live,” when applied to degeneracy, is a warm environment in which demonic nasties can grow.

    I firmly believe that to compartmentalize morality is to undermine it. The bulwark against demonry isn’t neutrality but an active and committed Christian populace.

  316. @Sue Dunham

    To me you are just an agent for evil and the putrid, smelly and unholy spirit that tried to attack in your wake this afternoon did not work satan. Your are evidence supporting what people say these times represent.

  317. Alfred says:

    Everything about Zelensky is fake. Here is a video they recently released. His (American?) bodyguard has the flag of Ukraine stitched into his uniform the wrong way up. Go to 1:13.

    Zelensky left Kiev ages ago. He is probably based in Poland. The videos showing him in Kiev streets were done with a green screen. He is an actor above all. 🤣

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  318. @Alfred

    If you do not believe in things spiritual then that is ok with me – for whatever reason the source of all goodness will have it so. But in the immediate aftermath of demonic attack this afternoon a kind of curtain was lifted and the name Zelinsky was there in an Ancient Egyptian hymn (in the form of “Green”).

    In this hymn it is used when the Creator unleashes Sekhmet to destroy a disobedient mankind. I believe the earliest substantial version appears on the shrine of King Tutankhamen as does the words “I am who I am”, i.e. a common translation for Yahweh (there is also coincidentally a pun on Ron Unz’s name in hieroglyphs which links him to a common meaning of that name via an Egyptian King).

    Coincidentally I posted in the past couple of days a link to a Bob Dylan song but now but I notice the unusual color cast on the video link – listen to the lyrics in which he (unwittingly) references an epithet of another form of an Egyptian god

    • Thanks: Alfred
  319. “In this hymn it is used when the Creator unleashes Sekhmet to destroy a disobedient mankind.”

    That is not what I wrote. Sekhmet is indeed the destructive force unleashed to destroy mankind but the hymn in question only identifies her with the “the Green One” and has nothing to do with destruction. I guess the demons are making hay whilst they can.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  320. @Jack McArthur

    Furthermore I learned something new after writing the above:

    A statue of Sekhmet was dressed in red facing west, while Bast was dressed in green and faced east. Bast was sometimes considered to be Sekhmet’s counterpart (or twin depending on the legend), and in the festival of Hathor they embodied the duality central to Egyptian mythology. Sekhmet represented Upper Egypt while Bast represented Lower Egypt.
    https://ancientegyptonline.co.uk/sekhmet/

    Sekhmet appears as the force of the Creator who has had enough with disobedient mankind. Bastet is commonly described as in time becoming the benign aspect of Sekhmet. Note which way they are pointing in the above passage and the meaning of Zelinksy’s name. Note also that in Egyptian mythology , and I think Hebrew?, that a person can be used and be in the hand of god without it meaning that they are of god but rather an instrument.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/21/style/volodymyr-zelensky-t-shirt.html

  321. anarchyst says:
    @Sue Dunham

    The Bible has gone through many translations, each translator injecting his own biases into the translation.
    This is where the “rights of kings and nobles” supremacy over peasants was codified in the King James Version.
    Let’s not forget Schofield, although not a translator, codified the supremacy of jews over gentiles–something which (until the Vatican II Ecumenical Council) was never accepted by Catholics. Old-line Catholics still do not subscribe to jewish supremacy.
    Protestants believe in “sola scriptura”, the Bible being the “unerring word of God” despite being written and translated by MEN. This is but another doctrinal error that Protestants subscribe to.

    • Thanks: Towey
  322. @anarchyst

    @ Sue Gay troll

    If you are given the grace I would grab onto this guys kindness with both hands because, in the words of the Catholic priest-scholar “even the devil can be Catholic”
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/abs/review-essay-speak-of-the-devil-hubert-wolf-on-pope-pius-xi-and-the-vatican-archives/4A948E7B4F43EB69829DD91164F07AD0

    because as sure as morning follows night somebody today is going to suffer for it.

  323. Alden says:
    @Rich

    Thank you so much for writing about the greatest hero of the 20th century; General Franco. Even Mussolini did better than Hitler. He was in power for 20 years instead of Hitler’s 12. And Italy didn’t lose any territory when the war ended. Hitler lost about half of Germany.

    It’s possible to construct a viable conspiracy theory that WW2 in Europe was a long term plot by Hitler and Stalin to give the Soviets half of Germany and 11 nations of Central Europe. That was the result of WW2 in Europe.

  324. Alden says:
    @Sue Dunham

    There’s only a couple of sentences in the entire Bible about homosexuality. And those sentences are in the Jewish part of the Bible. In the list of absolutely forbidden things. Like eating certain food or certain combinations of acceptable food. Or weaving or wearing linseywoolsey. A fabric worn world wide by every culture and civilization that had access to both sheep and linen or cotton.

    “ It is forbidden and a great sin if a man lies with a man as a man lies with a woman “. The penalty for that grievous sin is immediate execution “

    The Christian part of the Bible says absolutely nothing about homo or hetero sex; nothing. The forgiveness of the woman taken in adultery does not approve or disapprove of adultery. The point is forgiveness of sins.

    It’s reasonable to infer from the Bible that Jesus was a homing lifelong bachelor; very attached to his mother. It’s also reasonable to take the stories of Mary Magdalene and Mary and Martha and claim Jesus was married to one of them.

    The anti homo law was in the Jewish part of the Bible. Leviticus along with nonsense like you can’t marry a widowed sister in law. But if she and your brother haven’t had a child yet, you get to have sex with her till she has a child. Not gets pregnant. But has the baby. And neither your wife if you have one; nor the sister in law has nothing to say about it.,

    Jesus was homo. His lover was the long haired beardless guy pictured in the famous Last Supper mural. Jesus was hetero. He and Mary Magdalene had several kids.

    What a load.

    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @Hibernian
  325. Easyway says:

    Everyone stares spellbound at this flat screen standing in the middle of the room. It means promise, but also condemnation. We have to realize that it is a predator. It is there to look “into the world”, but to neglect our own roots. Every second we spend with it, we are its mental slaves. Our children get big eyes, want more of it. Who can all this serve?

  326. Alden says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    I’ve always assumed Priss Factor is a woman. I can’t say why, I just do.

    I haven’t looked at TOO for years. I’m very Jew aware. So the articles are nothing new to me. The comments are mostly anti catholic rants by uneducated rural southern American fundamentalist Protestants still fighting the reformation.

    Or were when I stopped looking at TOO

    • Agree: Pierre de Craon
  327. @Brooklyn Dave

    I have read/heard talk that the Zionists have their eyes on Ukraine in case Israel collapses. I wish I had articles/videos to back this up.

    While perhaps not dispositive, this is piece is certainly suggestive with respect to the plans of the Kolomoisky/ Zelensky regime and their fellow tribesmen:

    https://www.jta.org/2022/04/06/global/zelensky-ukraine-will-look-more-like-big-israel-than-europe-in-the-wake-of-russias-war

    Zelensky: Ukraine will look more like ‘big Israel’ than Europe in the wake of Russia’s war

    “We will become a ‘big Israel’ with its own face,” Zelensky said Tuesday at a briefing for Ukrainian media, Haaretz reported. “We will not be surprised if we have representatives of the armed forces or the national guard in cinemas, supermarkets, and people with weapons. I am confident that the question of security will be issue number one for the next ten years. I am sure of it.”

    So if Ukraine becomes “Big Israel”… who’s gonna be the Palestinians?

    You might also want to look up history of the [eventually cancelled] plans for settling American jews in the Crimea/ Southern Ukraine. The Tribe feels like they’ve got some sort of historical claim to the region [see also Galicia, Pale of Settlement, and Khazaria]. This is a good review from a semitic supremacist perspective – Crimea as a Potential Jewish Homeland [part of a longer review of jewish history in the region]. Even mentions that:

    …from 1924 until 1938, the Joint Distribution Committee – through the American Jewish Joint Agricultural Corporation and its American Jewish financiers – supported Jewish agricultural settlements in Soviet Crimea.

    and

    He [Stalin] secretly tried fifteen other Jewish people for allegedly conspiring with the U.S. to establish a Jewish republic in Crimea. After the War, in 1952, thirteen of the defendants, including Fefer and other Yiddish thinkers, writers and actors were executed in Moscow… In 1954, the Kremlin transferred the Crimea to the Ukranian Soviet Socialist Republic, officially extinguishing the flicker of its hope as a Jewish homeland.

    Stalin was just paranoid, of course. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=purim+1953&ia=web

  328. Alden says:
    @Sue Dunham

    Not exactly.

    For most of human history it was assumed that all zygotes started out as girls. And that beginning in the 7 th to the 12th week about half the embryos turned into boys and all the embryos grew into fetuses.

    These conclusions were made by the mothers midwives looking at the miscarried fetuses.

    Then it was discovered that during that 7-12 week period the mothers excreted more than usual testosterone for about half the babies . Reasonable conclusion is that it was the mothers testosterone that did it.

    Not true. The fertility clinics sponsored vast amounts of research about sex differentiation. Turns out that sex is determined when the sperm penetrates the egg.

    About half the sperm are XX and half are XY. And about half the eggs are penetrated by XX sperm and the other half by XY. So sex differentiation happens at conception.

    Given the expense and trouble of having a baby via fertility clinics. The customers were anxious to be able to order a boy or girl. So the fertility researchers did what their customers asked . And are now able to test a few days old blastocyst in a petri dish and determine if it’s XX or XY The test is supposed to be 100 percent accurate if done correctly. Standard procedure is to have not one but two embryologists preform and interpret the test. That’s fine in other medical procedures too. For instance blood transfusions. 2 RNs not nurse aides have to check and sign off the right type of blood is given to the patient.

    And now we know what makes boys and girls.

    • Replies: @gay troll
  329. @anarchyst

    Old-line Catholics still do not subscribe to Jewish supremacy.

    Absolutely correct.

    Among themselves, Traditionalist Catholics differ in certain priorities, but they have the following in common:

    — they hold a strong conviction that the Second Vatican Council and the changes it produced are somewhere between, at best, foolish and ill advised and, at worst, conceived from the get-go as a Judeo-Satanic revolutionary event to destroy the Church and the content of the Faith that was given to the Apostles by Christ Himself and intended by Him to be handed down unchanged till the end of time
    — they totally dismiss the idea that Vatican II has any doctrinal significance or merit
    — they are devoted to the Traditional Latin Mass, which has been unchanged in all essentials from circa 100 AD down to the present day
    — they scorn the New Mass produced in the wake and as a consequence of Vatican II

    Furthermore, almost all Traditional Catholics still adhere to the Church’s long-held and long-preached belief that the Jewish people are, as a community, to be regarded as what they proclaimed themselves to be when Christ walked the earth: namely, His enemies and the enemies of all who follow Him and His Cross.

    Even from the Cross, Christ told His followers to pray for the Jews’ repentance and their conversion to the Faith to which they have been called, along with the rest of mankind. Yet He specifically warned against confusing hope with reality: “I am sending you out like sheep among wolves; so be as cunning as serpents and yet as harmless as doves. Beware of men: they will hand you over to sanhedrins and scourge you in their synagogues” (Matt. 10:16–17).

    Because the sheep have ignored the call to develop the necessary cunning to cope with their enemies, the USA and much of the rest of the world are being devoured by the (((wolves))).

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Thanks: anarchyst, Towey
    • Replies: @Weave
  330. @Commentator Mike

    Thanks to both you and Franklin for this help. I’d never heard of yandex before reading your conversation with him.

  331. @Emslander

    Man made the religions (not God). Religions are manmad(e). Man made them more, the more he distanced himself from godhood, the hood of nature, from divinity, the real wine; that is why man started to wine and many priests actually like to take a full cup of red wine (our blood, je suis) during their childish sermons.
    The Christ never wanted priests! God wants you to be your priest, your one and only talking only to you and only when he is not talking.
    The holy scriptures are unholy, not whole, incomplete, half truth, outright falseness etc.
    Half true, half untrue is overall a lie.
    The Bible changes all the time, just like the past changes all the time (by man playing God).
    No priest (or politician for that matter) can represent or “teach” the Christ(-consciousness) in me.
    The Christ can never want religions, only religiousness in me and hence the body’s actions.
    The earned and given body is my (state of) temple as part of my nature, my natural God given surrounds. That is holy site.
    That whole nature temple contains and gives the Natural Law (Germanic Law).
    The right law has been ignored. Walls have been built into the sky to keep the right law out and the Roman Law prisonlike churched up with dumbfounded prisoners inside.
    The Roman Catholic Church is evil. Their Roman Law is evil.
    The moment I have to believe something a lesser tells me (lesser because he is less me and phantasie, e.g. the hungry child in Africa), I am lost and dependent on separation.
    I am never lost and and fairly rapidly know the moment I remember soul.
    Soul is the eternal lifepulse. When this temporary body (temple) dies “my lifepuls” still is, very still, but no longer “imprisoned” in a rotting body. My soul is hence unburdened.
    God – soul – is actually pretty simple.
    Soul is deeply disturbed by “…bishops had worked out most of these trinitarian heterodoxies by the end of the fourth century in a series of councils. The Athanasian Creed lays out in detail what the Christian world (Roman Catholic Church) understands of the Trinity…”
    It is disgusting. Have you ever met one priest (bi-shop, the split, the separation is already in the name of these wisps) who could hand you the essence? Did you receive the firmation in your confirmation? Did the priest confirm it for you in you? Did the holy spirit enter you? No, it did not, because from that moment on you would be the (loving) enemy of your bi-shopper (pretending to be able to saturate you with the divine illumination – the divine, energetic light). And so on and so forth….
    On earth, where everything is death, only you can reflect the Christ.
    The more church the less of you as a soul realization. It is like taxation. It is a tribute to the negative force.
    The Moses religions are part of the negative force, they are the negative force. And now I stop giving the devil more attention.
    I will not judge a greater soul like Bishop Williamson, because of his greatness in sacrifice, not because of his biblical maze, which is part of a Moses religion and that is the devil himself. So, I am sorry to read, that you are believing in the devilish manifestations of cat holy exorcisms aka CC or Rome. Without Rome, without your bishops, no wars. Every war and especially the Ukrainian war is only possible with the support of the catholic bishops (excluding the odd ones out like Williamson). Maybe that is their unconscious way of bringing people closer to divinity.
    Why does Russia have a stronger religiousness? Thanks to the Bolshois keeping the priests down and the live and death tolls up?

    • Replies: @Emslander
  332. Emslander says:
    @Kurt Knispel

    Good luck with all that gobbledygook when you talk to St. Peter, first Pope.

  333. @Sue Dunham

    Here a two concepts which might assist you with your incoherent, flailing attempts at “reasoning”:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-so_story
    https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=%5Bcitation%20needed%5D

    You’re welcome

  334. @Pierre de Craon

    Andrea Ostrov Letania, using this name and at least one other, has been posting extremely long comments at TOO since at least 2014, perhaps longer.*

    To my taste (others will disagree), the most irritating aspect of Letania’s style is, not her penchant for excessive length, but her addiction to filling her comments and articles with freshly coined memes and initialisms that serve no useful purpose. Here’s an example: “People have to learn that the problem is JEASWID: Jews Everywhere Are Stealing White Infants’ Diapers! Until we stop JEASWID, our newborns will never be safe.”

    I certainly won’t disagree. “Irritating” and “serve no useful purpose” — i.e. completely rhetorically ineffective and even counterproductive — sums it up pretty accurately. Here’s a typical example from the “Andrea Ostrov Letania” [AOL] substack account: The Need for Verita-Semitism, as well as Verita-Blackism and Homo-Veritism
    Wut?
    The AOL wordpress blog is chock-full of similarly annoying and (deliberately?) meaningless neologisms: Nativism is the Flip-side of Invavisism and …why homosexuals should be called ‘inversexuals. Note also that there are several different “AOL” blogspot accounts, VK, Gab, Parler, etc… The Blaze even has an “AOL” tag. A shallow internet footprint — but much wider than it might at first appear.

    AOL also has a suspiciously Jeff Stryker-esque tendency to spew paeans to the glories of muh “Black masculinity” that are semi-disguised as complaints.

    And — perhaps most interestingly — there’s also an “Andrea Ostrov Letania” account on Youtube. This is one of the playlists from that account:

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjJkWFcnnmqco201qNMiE1XijrfRyYNMF

    An older one:

    Huh.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  335. Weave says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    I am so grateful to you for this post. I wrote to a preacher asking what is the point of being a Christian if the Jews are so very “chosen” as to be held above Christian. He literally refused to answer me.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  336. @Emslander

    There is no such thing as luck.

  337. Exile says:

    Ron, can we get a permanent open thread where all discussion about “Jesus was really X” can be hashed out endlessly?

    Having every thread descend into a debate over Christianity casts a false light on the better level of discussion that really takes place here amidst the noise.

    Reducing everything to “stuff I like = Jesus, stuff I hate = Satan” or queeny psychoanalysis of Jesus as a homo or commie seems to be the natural destination for many threads and it’s disappointing.

    • Replies: @Towey
    , @Kapyong
  338. @Bill

    It’s well understood that homosexuality isn’t genetic. Twins studies demonstrate that it isn’t significantly heritable. Furthermore, if it were to be genetic, it would have been selected out long ago.

    Absolutely correct — but it’s important to understand some background here. The long-discredited “Born This Way” canard is an entirely bad faith argument. Its “advocates” don’t believe in it themselves. It’s a typical example of a semitic supremacist/ anti-White rhetorical technique called “strategic essentialism.” What’s that?

    Short answer: it’s when Ta-Nehisi Coates deliberately juxtaposes “Black bodies” [essentialist/ biological determinist] and “people who believe themselves to be White” [social constructionist]. Obvious low-IQ bad faith is obvious.

    Longer answer: “essentialism” [in the ontological sense, not the educational theory that goes by the same name]” is the view that objects have a set of attributes that are necessary to their identity” [their “essence”] — which is typically held to be WRONG and VERY BAD by “progressives.” Essentialism is “essentially” the opposite of social constructionism — the view that ontological categories, and even what we perceive to be reality, are entirely “socially constructed*,” which progs/ anti-Whites typically see as very GOOD. In the context of sexual preference, the essentialist view overlaps considerably with biological determinism [which, per progs, is even more WRONG and MORE BAD — in any other context than the propensity to engage in man-on-man anal sex]. See so-called “racial essentialism”, which even the “conservatives” at NRO agree is always evil (the authors’ names might perhaps be relevant here). “Gender” [sex] essentialism is also seen as serious wrongthink.

    So “strategic essentialism” means employing a concept that they don’t believe in themselves in an entirely bad faith manner… whenever it’s perceived to be useful for attacking the White goyim. Per the Oxford Reference, it’s:

    A political tactic employed by a minority group acting on the basis of a shared identity in the public arena in the interests of unity during a “struggle for equal rights.” The term was coined by Spivak and has been influential in feminism, queer theory, and postcolonial theory. Compare essentialism

    A lot of definitions of strategic essentialism will try to pretty it up by blabbering about muh “co-opting stereotypes” etc. This is mere pilpul/ obfuscation — aka bullshit. The point of “debates” about the etiology and pathogenesis of the propensity to engage in man-on-man anal sex is merely to reify that propensity as a “valid” identity/ ontological category.

    Anti-Whites, leftists, and semitic supremacists believe in power, not truth.

    Given the topic of the OP, I probably should mention that Greg Johnson is a big fan of the “Born this Way” canard — though he tends to cite the “sodomite uncle” just-so story as “proof” for his claims.

    *See also: “Social constructionism is a theory… which proposes that there are certain kinds of facts which, rather than depending on reality itself, instead depend on the shared ways of thinking about and representing the world that groups of people develop collaboratively.”

    • Agree: Bill
    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  339. @Dumbo

    “Sue Dunham”/ “gay troll” is probably not quite as stupid as “xe” might at first appear. Note the structure of “xir”arguments”:

    1. Focuses on sodomy as a [falsely-reified] “identity” rather than a behavior*

    2. Promotes the long-discredited “Born this Way” canard by spouting a veritable blizzard of random just-so stories, hoping something sticks.

    3. Claims that anyone who fails to celebrate/ sacralize sodomy to a degree that conforms to “xir” standards simply must want to kill all practitioners of man-on-man anal sex.

    Very reminiscent of the heavily-promoted “Westboro Baptist Church” media campaign, though less false-flaggy.

    *Compare and contrast with “Hate the sin, love the sinner”

    • Replies: @gay troll
  340. gay troll says:
    @Alden

    So sex differentiation happens at conception.

    You’re embarrassing yourself. No physiological differentiation occurs without hormonal mediation. This is why XY males with androgen insensitivity develop bodies that appear female. The first round of sexual differentiation occurs in the womb. The second round occurs at puberty. The genes govern the hormones, and the hormones govern the differentiation process. This means that other factors influencing hormones can also influence differentiation. Hence the proposed explanation for why a mother’s youngest son is more likely to be gay.

    Hormones are also influenced by diet and environmental exposure. Many plastics may have estrogenic effects. If it is true that homosexuality has become more prevalent in the last fifty years, environmental influences must be considered. BPA may be making more boys eunuch. Like Alex Jones and his gay frogs.

    Scientists don’t know if gay people are “born that way” or not. What they do know is that sexual orientation is not a choice. People like James Forrestal can blather on all they want. They can make the most elaborate theories to shine a light on their ignorance. What can I do except laugh at their witlessness? I would never have chosen to be gay. Same sex attraction took me by surprise at the age of 11 and I patiently waited for the phase to pass. I had to struggle to accept my nature precisely because I was raised in a culture that falsely regarded homosexuality as unnatural. Choice was the farthest thing from it.

  341. gay troll says:
    @James Forrestal

    Are you an idiot? Do you think that if I never practiced anal sex or “sodomy”, I would not be a homosexual? You are relying on baseless logic. Yes, of course the sexual act can be a choice. But what about the sexual desire? If I only desire to give sexual pleasure to men, but I choose to ignore this desire, does that mean I am not a homosexual? Or do you think sexual orientation is a myth? What if I only do hand stuff and no sodomy? I mean really, if I have no attraction to women, and I love cock, but all I do with the same sex is make out and rub genitals, I take it that is choosing not to be gay in your world?

    You claimed I “focused on sodomy”. When did I mention sodomy at all? Aren’t you the one focused on sodomy?

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  342. @geokat62

    Who is pulling the strings of Zelensky? Who funded his 2019 Presidential campaign? Who is Ihor Kolomoisky?

    Surely that’s just some sort of “anti-semiticist trope?” A “canard,” even? Let’s ask a prominent member of the rootless cosmopolitan community to refute it — a philosopher of enormous intellectual stature named Bernard-Henri Levy, who proclaims in Tablet:

    Ukraine’s Hero President Z.

    Ukrainian TV channel 1+1, which belongs to the Israeli-Ukrainian Igor Kolomoyskyi, Zelensky’s sponsor

    Huh. How about Levy’s crony, fellow fanatical Israel Firster and Atlantic Council shill Vladislav Davidzon? What does he have to say about the Ukraine situation?

    Jewish Ukraine Fights Nazi Russia
    Ukraine… is led in battle by a president, a minister of defense, chief of administration, and a mayor of Kyiv who all have Jewish blood and roots.

    Jews control Ukraine? Oy vey — yet another canard. Must be one of those “self-hating” jews.

    And he ends with: Glory to Ukraine! And glory to Zelensky, the bravest Jew on earth!

    Literally “Slava Zelensky!

    What do Max Boot, Bill Kristol, Eliot Cohen, Jennifer Rubin, Antony Blinken, and David “Axis of Evil” Frum have to say about the perceived “need” for America to go to war in Ukraine?

    Sure seems like there’s an element of… tribalism at work here. Systemic tribalism, even.

  343. @Priss Factor

    I look at homosexuality and transgenderism the same way I look at religion. Do what you want just dont force it upon others. Homos arent a monolith anymore than straight people. Like you said, some are patriots and artists and leaders., Others think themselves superior and demand not just acceptance or tolorance but adulation and worship. An attitude which is wholly manufactured by the anti white ptb. They break us down using crt and offer the chance to become accepted and admired by becoming homos and trannies while simultaneaously celebrating black masculinity, interracial coupling and demonizing white masculinity as toxic. The homo crusade is entirely designed to destroy the white race.

  344. Towey says:
    @Exile

    How stupid can you be? The whole source of disputes for the past 2,000 years is whether Christ is who he claims to be. That is the crunch of the matter

  345. Kapyong says:
    @Exile

    “Having every thread descend into a debate over Christianity casts a false light on the better level of discussion that really takes place here amidst the noise.”

    Yes.

    Jesus is utterly irrelevant to nearly all threads here, this is not a Christian debate site.

    • Replies: @Towey
    , @Emslander
    , @Emslander
  346. geokat62 says:
    @James Forrestal

    … a philosopher of enormous intellectual stature named Bernard-Henri Levy

    … right up there with Socrates/Plato, Aristotle, and Thales.

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  347. Towey says:
    @Kapyong

    Western civilization is based on Christianity whether you like it or not. The legalization of usury, the privatisation of the emission of the currency and the imposition of the central bank system were all the result of the revolt against the Catholic bann on usury by the Protestant sects Read Barren Metal by E M Jones or watch the Money Masters on YouTube.

    • Replies: @Exile
    , @Kapyong
  348. @James Forrestal

    Thank you for your evidence and analysis. Both should prove most helpful to the many readers who are not yet wise to what AOL is really trying to do.

    AOL’s blog and her comments at various sites throughout the white-consciousness segment of the Internet—along with what I take for its spillover here at Unz Review, the Jung-Freud articles—truly represent a cesspit, in that she would have us accept vile Jewish propaganda and “culture” as fundamentally worthwhile and valid even as she pretends to oppose and decrypt them via picking at the odd nit here and there. In a word, she spits out the small fib while swallowing the big lie—and does it with a species of rhetorical grandiosity that, for some incomprehensible reason, appears to attract almost as many people as it repels.

    As you know, the expression “It’s a dirty job, but someone had to do it” is used nowadays almost invariably with facetious (and frequently self-congratulatory) intent. With respect to the AOL cesspit, I may have lifted its lid a bit, but you have tossed the lid aside and drawn out a large helping of especially rank samples for analysis. So for a dirty job well done, I tip my hat to you with no facetiousness but instead with genuine respect. Now please consider treating yourself to a long psychic shower!

  349. @Weave

    Thanks very, very much.

    I wish that I could say that your comment about the preacher comes as a surprise. Unfortunately, Christian clerical formation now tends to produce clergy who are as reluctant to be forthright about their commitment to Eternal Truth as most laymen are.

  350. Hibernian says:
    @Sue Dunham

    Anti-Catholicism can be fun… …for some people. Please explain how the fact that Jesus was conceived, in Mary’s womb, by the Holy Spirit, refutes the fact that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are three persons in one God.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  351. Hibernian says:
    @Alden

    If there were descendants of Jesus I think we would have heard from them. Or maybe they are just living quietly.

  352. @James Forrestal

    So the Jew is telling it straight like it is that Jews run the Ukraine. The Nazis then run off to kill the Russians for the Jews. Simple and straightforward. No one can quite deny it now and the Western pubic agrees with this and supports it.

  353. anarchyst says:
    @Freedomstillisntfree

    The problem is twofold.
    Homosexuals are promiscuous to a fault. There may be one or two outliers that profess their “fidelity” to only one partner, but such liaisons are rare.
    Homosexuals have to “recruit” underage boys as they have an insatiable desire to introduce susceptible young boys to the “lifestyle”. As boys sexual mores are not yet fully developed, recruiting and buggering underage boys is easy to accomplish and ruins them for life.
    A California homosexual “choir group” actually bragged about recruiting and getting young boys “into the fold”.
    When it comes to “adoptions” by homosexuals, children in such households know that something is missing–a parent of the opposite sex.
    I don’t care what adults do privately, but it rarely stays private.
    Observe the “slippery slope”. Pedophilia is abut to be redefined as “minor-attracted adults”…not good.
    Add to that, “gender fluidity”, being promoted as “just another lifestyle” which is out and out mental illness–nothing more.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  354. @anarchyst

    It’s like Satan sent down a horde of demons on the West. Definitely not good.

  355. Alrenous says: • Website
    @littlereddot

    The Founding Mothers obviously didn’t care about the Red Man, and you don’t either. Not caring about strangers is kind of a thing.

  356. anon[274] • Disclaimer says:
    @Freedomstillisntfree

    Do what you want just dont force it upon others.

    Seems majority of people are unable to do this because they require recognition of other people opinions to justify whatever it is they believe in or do. Only an anti-social mind-set is capable of disregarding opinions of other people. The anti-social has the benefit of not basing their thinking through others frame of reference. But as it is people today are hyper-socialized. Almost everything they do is based on ‘what will so and so think’. It is a pathetic way of being. There needs to be an influx of extreme anti-social personalities to reverse this problem or better still an extreme reduction in human population density.

    I see this as a ruralite versus urbanite divide in mind-set and the urbanite has been winning for centuries. Racial differences are primary. Some races are innately hyper-socialized and require constant interaction of other people in order to be satisfied(Med/Levantine and Blacks). Other kinds are innately anti-social preferring only to encounter other people outside their direct kin when required or for rare special occasions to celebrate seasons and harvests(Northern/Germanic). This is why the idea of freedom only resonates with the northern kind. The more south and east you go the less this counts until you have a Jew asking ‘freedom to do what?’ (Marcus Eli Ravage or Maurice Samuel – I get them confused). They simply do not understand it.

    As far as I’m concerned only northern Europeans have the capability of free-will.

    • Replies: @Freedomstillisntfree
  357. anon[274] • Disclaimer says:

    To the moderator.. my posts have been historically labeled as anon[390]. Not sure why it changed this time. Used the same email address.

  358. N of 1 says:

    I’m glad to see Jared Taylor has persuaded you that whites are people too Michael.

  359. Wokechoke says:
    @Been_there_done_that

    The removal of Imran Khan and earlier Neville Chamberlain were coup detat.

  360. It would be an improvement if, instead of grooming elementary school children to become queers and trannies, the same teachers were to honestly inform the child students about the Jewish Problem.

  361. Exile says:
    @Towey

    Usury has been condemned by civilizations worldwide since the very beginning.

    https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1600&context=student_scholarship

    I try to remain sympathetic to Catholics but their claims to have invented morality, civilization, science etc… really wear on my sympathies at times.

  362. Kapyong says:
    @Towey

    Western civilization is based on Christianity whether you like it or not. The legalization of usury, the privatisation of the emission of the currency and the imposition of the central bank system were all the result of the revolt against the Catholic bann on usury by the Protestant sects Read Barren Metal by E M Jones or watch the Money Masters on YouTube.

    Indeed.
    Barren Metal was fascinating, learned a lot about the Reformation and more. Now on The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit.

    Sometimes a reference to Christianity and/or Jesus is relevant, but posts arguing for the “Real Jesus” amount to little more than preaching, because the evidence is so poor and debatable. Peter Kirby lists nine different historical Jesus theories :
    http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/theories.html

    Real Jesus arguments don’t belong here.

    Readers who do want to discuss this might like the BC&H forums :
    https://earlywritings.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=3

    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  363. @Been_there_done_that

    Who are you kidding? Obama himself copped to the US having “brokered a deal”, i.e., confected a coup d’etat. https://twitter.com/jhas5/status/1513351231691014149. As for snipers, if as reported the shots came from Maidan or Right Sektor controlled buildings, that perfectly fits the always-useful _cui bono_ analysis. Peddle your Nuland defense elsewhere, it is not passing the laugh test here.

  364. @Emslander

    Emslander, should I be afraid of a supposed saint you call Peter, a traitor (acc. to the bible) and first poop of evil Rome (acc. to forever changing “history”; his stories)?
    From your above onliner or pointe, a verbal lollipop without impact effect for knowing, but for the uninitiated bypasser, a small nasty misguide, ought to be clarified nevertheless (not for believers, but for souls who want to know, because of a need to know, what is really below or above).
    Besides “God” there are gods (demigods), angels, fairies and saints; they do not belong to God. They are apart, they are partly separated, just like earthians.
    “Who is like you, Lord, among the gods?
    Who is like you, glorious in holiness, awesome in praise, doing wonders?”
    (Note: Bible quotes here are only crutches for thick and/or fearful skulls like Emslander’s. The Bible is despicable because it hides a big lie under 10 truths. The Bible is an evil construct of devious men. Religions are made by humans to control religiosity. “Control freaks!”

    [MORE]

    The Bible is a construct of the Jews to confuse and enslave people. Bible knowledge is only helpful if you have compassion for a suffering person and wish them to face wholesome divinity by removing the fog of the wicked priests and the writings of the politicians and the evil spirits of the Bible. The Bible is evil like every founding scripture of the 6 Moses religions. However, there are secondary records (prayers; pray = beg) made in good faith that are noteworthy. If you pick them up and walk with them, you can get caught as a god, angel, fairy or saint. “Caught” because to become holy is not to be at home, being special instead of united, unseparated, completely one in God. You are the son of God! You are the daughter of God! Demigods, angels, fairies and saints are still separated from God and actually envy humans (earth dwellers) because they still have the chance to truly dissolve into God, which demigods, angels, fairies and saints (with all their great deeds) have not succeeded in doing. Their harvest is very special. They were very special on earth and hence attained a special status beyond the earthy realms.
    Don’t take my word for it. Explore and examine yourself. If you come to a point where you can only believe, investigate and examine further when you have time and strength again. Never give up. God is with you.
    “Lord, you said that once I decided to follow you,
    you’d walk with me all the way. But I have noticed that during
    the most troublesome times in my life,
    there is only one set of footprints. I don’t understand why,
    when I needed you most, you would leave me.”
    The Lord replied,
    “My precious child, I love you and I would never leave you.
    During your times of trial and suffering,
    when you see only one set of footprints,
    it was then that I carried you.”
    There is nothing between you and God. No gods, no angels, no masses, let alone often silly saints, which is not to mock them, except for some of these “saints” consecrated by priests and politicians of the Vatican and other countries. Especially the Church in Rome holds up “saints” who are really inmates of hell.
    Real saints can only be loved, but often have to shake their heads and wonder why this holy man didn’t take care of his real neighbor, his wife, and help her attain happy motherhood; instead went off and did…whatever special thing).
    Gods, angels, fairies and saints are still separated from God because of deeds that go beyond the ordinary and mundane, because of great deeds, heroic, glorious, compassionate whatever deeds. For something far beyond that, they have become very special and have risen above ordinary souls. Gods, angels, fairies and saints are extraordinary souls, so special that “they” (their soul parts) no longer have to suffer on earth, the valley of death, where everything dies and rots, where everything dies and is recycled into whatever, from single-celled organisms to human beings (in whatever small or large form, e.g., without a voice and, at the other extreme, with a voice that delights everyone, even “God” – like e.g. “Oh, he has a divine voice.”)
    “You shall have no other gods before me.”
    Emslander. Do you know your quoted and threatened Saint Peter? Shall I be afraid of your saint Peter. Why would you want me to be afraid. Why would you want a saint Peter between me and God? Have you met a saint named Peter? Can you call a Saint Peter? Does he answer and how does he answer when you call a Saint Peter? If so…, you may have another problem…. If he is genuine, he might reject you and tell you to stay in truth and hence true love in God instead of holiness (not to mention “holy scriptures”). What do you do when that paper is burned or taken away from you? What do you do when the church is burned down and your priest has fled?
    As I said, this gibberish is for the interested passerby who may or may not be able to comprehend.
    Thank you, Emslander.
    Have you ever had the opportunity to visit Emsland? Emsland is a part of the true holy land where milk and honey flow. It is a part of the true North, which the Jew is trying to annex with his boundless greed and ego. Berlin – Babelsberg is his Babylon. Israel is not the holy land. It is a phony and the stepping stone for the Jew to annex the holy land, the True North.
    (I lost “faith” when a good man was poisoned and a very evil Poolish Jew, named Aaron Woityla, dared to make up a pope of Rome. His secretary Ratzinger, a very poor soul, which I also came to know personally, made his former Jewish chief in crime a Saint of the Catholic Church.)

  365. @Kapyong

    Who are you?
    What is a “real Jesus argument”?
    It should not be here, because you do not like it?!
    Go and fuck yourself, you fucking censor bastard!

    • Replies: @anon
  366. Emslander says:
    @Kapyong

    Please read the essay that is at the top of this commentary. I think you’ll find that the topic of how we approach the religious war in Ukraine is at its heart.

    Besides, it’s not Jesus that infects every commentary section, but Jews. Find one area of dispute on Unz that doesn’t quickly go right to the main point: “It’s all the fault of the Jews.”

    • Replies: @Exile
    , @Anon
  367. Emslander says:
    @Kapyong

    Jesus is utterly irrelevant to nearly all threads here, this is not a Christian debate site.

    I always follow the rule of not throwing pearls before swine until the swine want to make a point of it.

  368. Exile says:
    @Emslander

    Jews are discussed where they are relevant.

    They are certainly relevant to NATO policy in light of Jewish dual-citizen policy-makers in the US g- many Vindmans with ethnic axes to grind over Ukraine – as well as their massive over-representation and control over the jingoistic US media and in American finance which seeks to “open markets” in Russia’s sphere of influence and re-exploit Russia like the 1990’s.

    On the other hand, both Russia and Ukraine are Christian nations. Religion is not relevant to the discussion.

    Greg’s homosexuality is a social and political problem that colors his politics. It is no more religious than Greg is.

    EMJ’s own agenda is to argue that since everything is relevant to Catholicism (as he frames it), we must therefore “admit” that religion is the central pillar of society.

    • Replies: @Emslander
    , @Emslander
  369. Emslander says:
    @Exile

    Like I said, find me a single thread of commentary here that doesn’t contain the opinion that “it’s the Jews”. I once decided to figure out the average number of comments that pass from the beginning of any comment section until some variation of “it’s the Jews” shows up. Useless endeavor. It’s either the first or the second in the vast majority of articles.

    • Replies: @Exile
    , @Kurt Knispel
  370. Emslander says:
    @Exile

    In this article it took three relevant comments before “it’s the Jew” showed up.

    I think Unz ought to just place that comment at #1 as a featured shortcut below every new article.

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  371. @gay troll

    Do you think that if I never practiced.. “sodomy”, I would not be a homosexual?

    Do you think that if you never stole anything, you would be a thief?

    If you “felt an urge” to be a doctor, but never went to medical school… would you be a physician?

    “Sodomite troll” seems to be… very triggered by my simple, straightforward observations with respect to the obvious incoherence of xer patently bad faith “arguments.”

    Since xe seems wholly incapable of expressing the “logic” behind xer fanatical, confused attempts to promote the “Born This Way™” trope, let’s see if we can clarify xer “thinking” with some simple Socratic stimuli: Does xe promote similarly ludicrous claims with respect to the etiology and pathogenesis of bronyism, furryism, foot fetishism, etc.? Is there a “brony gene?” A “furry hormone?” If not — why not? Why is this hard biological determinist approach only applied to a single category of aberrant sexual behavior? Does xir enthusiasm for the long-discredited “sodomite uncle” canard extent to the less-known — but equally valid — “brony uncle” hypothesis?

    At any rate, xir enraged, histrionic response makes it quite clear that xe is very sensitive to any discussion of the origins of man-on-man sexual behavior on its own terms, and insists that it simply must be falsely reified into some sort of “identity” because, uh, reasons. See “strategic essentialism” above.

    The long-discredited “Born This Way™” canard was very popular in hegemonic media/ academia narratives in the 1990s-early 2000s, so it was commonly parroted by NPCs/ status strivers/ other propaganda victims during that period. But it has long since been displaced by a much more abstract, queer theory-based campaign promoting transsexualism.

    In the current year, desperate, flailing, failed attempts to promote the no-longer-fashionable “Born This Way™” trope are far more likely to originate from the sodomite community than from NPCs — as we see in this thread. Men who have sex with men seem desperate to suppress one alternative hypothesis in particular — that grooming/ molestation in childhood might play a role in determining the propensity to engage in man-on-man sexual behavior in adulthood — for some reason.

    Personally, I’m not emotionally committed to a specific hypothesis in the way that “sodomite troll”/ “Sue Dunham” so clearly is. Since — unlike xem — I’m both tolerant and logical, I’m certainly willing to consider likely alternative etiologies of aberrant sexual behavior — such the possibility of an infectious cause.

    Note also that “sodomite troll”/ “Sue Dunham” remains wholly incapable of addressing the other issue I mentioned — xir over-the-top, WBC*-style “dem ebil Christyuns, dey fixin’ ta keel me!” victimhood-mongering.

    *For those who still don’t get it, the so-called “Westboro Baptist Church” was a propaganda campaign intended to create the illusion of “Christian poisecution” of men who have sex with men. It used the same basic template as the Skokie “not-sees” back in the 1970s, who were led by Frank “Collin” Cohen, backed by the ACLU — and were also heavily promoted by the so-called “news” media. “Sodomite troll”/ “Sue Dunham” is doing the same routine, just from the other side.

    • Replies: @gay troll
  372. @Emslander

    Probably should let those dastardly “anti-semitic conspiracy theorists” at… Tablet know while you’re at it. They’re not helping at all:

    https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/ukraines-western-face

    As Pro-European Protests Seize Ukraine, Jewish Oligarch Victor Pinchuk Is a Bridge to the West

    As a prominent member of the rootless cosmopolitan community — and a philosopher of enormous intellectual stature named Bernard-Henri Levy once proclaimed [also in Tablet]:

    Ukraine’s Hero President Z.

    Ukrainian TV channel 1+1, which belongs to the Israeli-Ukrainian Igor Kolomoyskyi, Zelensky’s sponsor

    How about Levy’s crony, fellow fanatical Israel Firster and Atlantic Council shill Vladislav Davidzon? What does he have to say [in Tablet] about the Ukraine situation?

    Jewish Ukraine Fights Nazi Russia
    Ukraine… is led in battle by a president, a minister of defense, chief of administration, and a mayor of Kyiv who all have Jewish blood and roots.

    Jews control Ukraine? Oy vey — yet another canard. Must be one of those “self-hating” jews.

    And he ends with: Glory to Ukraine! And glory to Zelensky, the bravest Jew on earth!

    You probably shouldn’t look into the positions that Max Boot, Bill Kristol, Eliot Cohen, Jennifer Rubin, Antony Blinken, and David “Axis of Evil” Frum have taken with respect to the perceived “need” for the American goyim to go to war in Ukraine, either.

    On the “sodomite disco” aspect, you’d better get after that well-known ebil not-see, Joe Biden, as well. Clearly, the only reason that all of his children married into the Tribe was because it was all part of a secret plot to subvert the semitic community:

    https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4382986,00.html

    Biden: Jewish leaders drove gay “marriage” changes
    Biden said, “Think – behind of all that, I bet you 85% of those changes… are a consequence of Jewish leaders”

    Yes, it’s clearly just a big conspiracy by a cabal of very sneaky German ethnonationalists and Danzig irredentists who are just trying to make the Tribe look bad. Oy vey!

    • Replies: @Emslander
  373. @geokat62

    … right up there with Socrates/Plato, Aristotle, and Thales.

    Hey, anyone who consistently refers to themselves in the third person is clearly a deep thinker. It’s like, a rule or something.

    Though some argue that this behavior might say more about his own perception of his intellectual stature…

  374. raga10 says:
    @RadicalCenter

    Or were you allegedly a non-sodomite for some reason hanging out in those bars?

    Well, that’s completely off-topic, but since you asked… yes, I’m a non-sodomite who nevertheless enjoyed gay bars, discos and Mardi Gras parades because they were just safe places where anyone was happily accepted as long as you didn’t act like a dick to them. And you’d be surprised how many straight women there were in such places – for that same reason.

  375. Emslander says:
    @James Forrestal

    Yes, it’s clearly just a big conspiracy by a cabal of very sneaky German ethnonationalists and Danzig irredentists who are just trying to make the Tribe look bad. Oy vey!

    \
    It appears that after going through that unnecessarily detailed analysis of sexual perversions, you simply lost your mind and started throwing Jew mentions in a comment addressed to yours truly.

    I have no idea what triggered you.

  376. @Wokechoke

    Hitler went over the edge in the first 5 years though.

    That’s assuming that Barbarossa was not a pre-emptive strike intended to head off an imminent Soviet invasion.

  377. geokat62 says:
    @James Forrestal

    Though some argue that this behavior might say more about his own perception of his intellectual stature…

    Intellectual stature? Judging by that pic, it looks as though BHL has significant issues with his physical posture. Rather than positioning his feet in a “V” formation like all the other men in the pic, BHL positions his feet in an inverted “V,” or Λ, which has certain anatomical implications.

  378. @Been_there_done_that

    Since I followed events at the time, I think it is quite amazing how such a patently ridiculous propaganda narrative was successfully shaped, years later, and is now duly repeated without thought at this web site.

    Victoria Nuland was known to the readers of this site as the architect of the Ukraine regime change at the time it happened. In 2014, there were 18 articles about Victoria Nuland’s treasonous activities in Ukraine by ERIC MARGOLIS, ISRAEL SHAMIR, MIKE WHITNEY , PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS (3), PETER LEE (6), PHILIP GIRALDI , STEPHEN J. SNIEGOSKI, STEVE SAILER (3), and TODD E. PIERCE plus she came up twice in Steve Sailer’s comment section.

  379. Exile says:
    @Emslander

    Galloping with the goalposts, he’s off to the races.

    Now instead of addressing why Christianity isn’t relevant to the topic of Russia vs. Ukraine, we get to count posts about Jews?

    I replied with perfectly obvious arguments why Jews are relevant to this situation and Christianity is not, but you apparently don’t really want to talk about that.

    • LOL: Emslander
  380. @James Forrestal

    I would like to help Levy relax his toes: put a robe around his neck and pull him higher.
    That would make him literally a highlight for once.

  381. gay troll says:
    @James Forrestal

    You’re the one who’s triggered, James. Putting Ebonics in my mouth? Addressing me with woke/trans pronouns? Calling me a “sodomite”? You are obviously attracted to straw men. I am neither black, nor trans, nor sexually active.

    xir over-the-top, WBC*-style “dem ebil Christyuns, dey fixin’ ta keel me!” victimhood-mongering.

    Where did I say Christians are fixing to kill me? Where? Actually I have been pointing out that according to the Bible, executing homosexuals is a Jewish pastime.

    At any rate, xir enraged, histrionic response makes it quite clear that xe is very sensitive to any discussion of the origins of man-on-man sexual behavior on its own terms, and insists that it simply must be falsely reified into some sort of “identity” because, uh, reasons.

    I told you the reason homosexuality is part of my identity, because I became aware of it during puberty and it was not a choice I made. You can argue against it all you want. You will never convince me that my experience was fake or that I’m lying to myself. I’ve seen a lot of other gay people too, we are certainly not all the same, but it’s obvious that most of us share the same sexual orientation.

    You say a thief is only a thief if he steals. I know Jesus would disagree with you; he says a sinful thought is just as dangerous as a sinful action. Consider those seven years of my life when I knew I was only attracted to males, but before I had sex. I spent those seven years accepting the reality of my sexual orientation. Why would I spend seven years choosing something that I never wanted? And why didn’t you simply answer my question? If I never engage in “sodomy”, and never have sexual relations with women, but jerk other men off constantly, am I still a homosexual? Am I a sinner?

    Personally, I’m not emotionally committed to a specific hypothesis in the way that “sodomite troll”/ “Sue Dunham” so clearly is. Since — unlike xem — I’m both tolerant and logical, I’m certainly willing to consider likely alternative etiologies of aberrant sexual behavior — such the possibility of an infectious cause.

    Actually it’s obvious that you are committed to avoiding a specific hypothesis: that sexual orientation can be determined before birth. You harp on the idea that sexuality can only be a conscious choice. But then you go an invoke the possibility of an infectious cause. Why? Do you really want to undermine your own argument? You are now casting about for ways that sexuality might be biologically determined? Next you are going to tell me that I was molested by my uncle as a child and he transmitted his mental illness? That’s not a choice either. Why don’t you get your story straight before you post another wall of text? It’s obvious that you are emotionally unhinged and not thinking clearly or fairly. You are neither tolerant nor logical; you’re a troll.

    You are the one dwelling on Jewish scripture. Christian, your attitude is not. Take that word out of your mouth, “Sodomy”. It is a term of Jewish malevolence.

    • Thanks: Emslander
  382. @anon

    You make very good points with one exception. I would posit that there are some asian groups who appreciate freedom and individuality as much as we do and tend to still be weary of outsiders. Japanese being a good example. Theyre intelligent, humble and stick to their own.

  383. Anonymous[228] • Disclaimer says:

    Given the obnoxiousness of the most militant LGBTQ+ activism, I can understand the reflexive disdain many conservative nationalist types have for homosexuality. Though, I sometimes find the sheer intolerance that many non-Christian nationalists seemingly have for all gays and LBTs, as individuals, to be more baffling.

    I’m not sure how representative this is, but as this Eurocanadian essay suggests, it’s not inconceivable for gays to be sympathetic to white nationalism rather than fashionable anti-white leftism:

    https://www.eurocanadians.ca/2022/04/nationalism-needs-to-expand-beyond-conservatives-a-gay-persons-perspective.html

    • Replies: @Exile
  384. Exile says:
    @Anonymous

    “It’s not inconceivable” but it is vanishingly rare – and incoherent with nationalism in general, White or otherwise.

    Homosexuality is fundamentally anti-social. The handful of conflicted individuals who manage to somehow awkwardly compartmentalize their transgressive sexual behavior from some degree of respect for non-sexual norms don’t justify including gays in any nationalist movement.

  385. …despicable cowards who want the goyim to die for their agenda…

    The first crack in this dam occurred when Facebook changed its hate speech policy.

    So just to contextualize this, the Canadian truckers who were protesting COVID restrictions are Nazis because “Honk Honk equals Heil Hitler,” as one Jewish member of Parliament said, but the people who openly identify with Nazism and its goals are not because they are working with Jews, who have Jewish privilege, which allows them to make truth the opinion of those who control the media through organizations like the ADL.

    Because Frodi Mitjord, Scandza’s founder, was having trouble narrowing the topic, I proposed my own: “White Nationalists should come to the aid of the Jews and Nazis who are using the Ukrainian people to advance NATO’s agenda against Russia.”

    Why this reticence to talk about whiteness on of all places the Scandza Forum, the ultimate white guy operation?

    …Johnson’s attempt to make homosexuality an acceptable part of the white nationalist movement.

    The infallible sign that you’re dealing with a commissar arrives when the representative of the movement—be it conservatism or white nationalism—announces that it’s time to broaden the movement to include homosexuals.

    …denouncing everything I mentioned as Russian propaganda, including commonplaces like Victoria Nuland’s role in the 2014 coup d’etat which overthrew Ukraine’s democratically elected government.

    …the Great Satan who presides over the gay disco.

    There are obvious connections between Johnson’s debating style and the sterility of homosexual intercourse…

    EMJ mistake defining Jews by professed religion when they are an ethnicity, a race:

    By the end of the 15th century, western Europe was effectively Judenrein because the Jews living there had either converted to Christianity or, more importantly for our purposes, moved to Poland, whose boundaries at that point included what is now the Ukraine.

    Nothing’s changed to today with OxyCotin and covid vaccines:

    The Jews reciprocated by abusing their privileges and enslaving the peasant population through the monopolies they enjoyed in usury and the production of alcohol.

    Of course the term “white” was first used to describe humans because of the contrast in their first interfaces with black Africans, EMJ citing Virginia tobacco plantations and colonial North America, but despite whether he wants to use the term “race” or “ethnic” Jews see themselves as separate from Euros genetically. Jew hate for whitey is thus based although their hatred for said descendants of Europe is due to Europe having been Christendom, Jews seeing Jesus for His position as He originally announced at Luke 4:16-30 as lethal to (((their))) tool for ethnic supremacy / parasitism, usury.

    Certainly EMJ must mean “there” among the Jews because we as Americans know of the radical nature of Jew immigrants arriving in NYC during that time because it was (((their))) behavior which caused the American reaction which was the 1924 federal immigration act limiting prospectively to Western Europeans:

    …all of the radical ideologies which were circulating there during the 19th century.

    Solzhenitsyn, however, tells a different story in Two Hundred Years Together. The Jews refused to engage in physical labor. When the Czarist government gave them horses and plows, they immediately sold them and lived of the money they earned from the sale in addition to usury and the sale of alcohol, which were their normal sources of income.

    Sounds like what NYC students did at the midwestern state universities during the 1960s:

    The universities which the Czar founded in 19th century Russia became hotbeds of revolutionary subversion from the moment they began accepting Jews as students.

    Immediately following this accurate statement

    Jewish terrorism led to pogroms, which led to mass migration to the United States, where the Jews nursed their ancestral animus against Russia and longed for revenge.

    EMJ describes the Holodomor neglecting to mention Kaganovich’s ethnicity and the even more prominent role of his fellow Jew Gendrich Yedota, the point being this Soviet atrocity which in actuality exceeds the claims of the Holocaust industry was inflicted upon Ukrainians by Jews, not Russians, and any present day Banderites acting under Axov Brigade or other name are either frauds or totally misled in directing their Holodomor driven angst against Russians instead of Jews like Nuland and Zelenski.

    Concise TRUTH:

    The new era of Ukrainian history began when Ukraine emerged as a nation from the wreckage of the Soviet Union in 1991. The same Jewish neoconservatives who promised Mikhail Gorbachev that they would not extend NATO one inch to the east overthrew the legitimately elected government of the Ukraine in 2014 and installed a Jewish puppet as its new president. That Jewish puppet has been replaced by the current Jewish puppet, who plays the piano with his penis and is now holding the Ukrainian people hostage.

    Then this very next sentence is flawed to the point of misleading

    As the history I have recounted shows, the current conflict in Ukraine has nothing to do with race…

    because it ignores the reality that Talmudic Judaism is merely a written expression of Jewish instinct for ethno-supremacy and exploitation/enslavement of the outgroup via behavior in instinctive concert and the very usury Jesus attempted to end in His first recorded public statement detailed by Luke. So yes, Jews driven by their ethnicity hate Christians for being Christ’s flock, but the hate is fueled by the haters’ ethnicity.

    The remainder of that paragraph is prescous truth:

    but it has a lot to do with the Jewish history of the Ukraine, and the Jews’ desire to use the Ukrainian people once again as human shields to advance their agenda. This is literally the case in Mariopol, where the Jews’ Nazi proxy warriors are refusing to let the Russian civilian population leave the city. All of these claims can be substantiated by videos on the internet, and all of them were disputed by “der Geist der stets verneint” during our debate.

    EMJ is BRILLAINT and obviously courageous to speak truth to #Jew\$Power and, indeed, he shows both by referencing Charlottesville, the seminal public occurrence in the USA since the republic was established, but the white guys legally exercising their rights there did not

    …pick up spears and charge…

    but acted lawfully only defending themselves and attempting to escape when violently attacked.

    Yes, Christian Russia was forced by Jews in control of US to act in self defense, so it truly

    …it’s about Russia’s religious opposition to the gay disco.

    But the perps are Jews motivated by their ethnic supremacy self worship who hate whitey in Russia for being Christian and worldwide for being the descendants of Christendom because Jesus at Luke 4 came out of the gate voiding the fuel empowering Jew ethno-supremacism POWER, JEW USURY.

  386. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    …despicable cowards who want the goyim to die for their agenda…

    Actually their primary agenda in this age A.D. has been genocide of the white goyim for being the descendants of Christendom due to Luke 4:16-30.

    #EndJewU\$ury

  387. @Hibernian

    I’m an American who made my home in Odessa, UA several years ago. You are completely FULL OF SHIT! Please tell me with specificity, EXACTLY what the insanely criminal UA government allows that Russia doesn’t, excepting LGBTQ and other sick, aberrant behaviors!

  388. Wielgus says:
    @James Forrestal

    Clearly not a man with his feet firmly planted on the ground…

  389. Bill says:
    @Sue Dunham

    Even if it is purely genetic, your argument doesn’t hold water. Haven’t you heard of recessive genes?

    Go away and learn something about genetics. Once you can explain why what you have written here is not merely wrong, not merely stupid, but proof positive that the author has no idea what she is talking about, try again.

  390. @Emslander

    Matthaeus 12:34
    O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.
    Matthaeus 13:15
    For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
    Johannes 8:43-44
    Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

    [MORE]

    Some of the countless insults of Jesus Christ by the Jews:
    Yeshua is the correct Hebrew name, meaning “Savior and Beatificator.” However, in Jewish writings he is given the following names:
    Yeshu, because he could not free himself from the hands and violence of his enemies.
    Jíshu, which are the first three letters of the three words jímmach schemó vesichronó, that is: “His name and memory be destroyed”.
    Elohé haarélim, that is: “the uncircumcised God”.
    Elohé Edom, that is: “the God of Edom” or the “Edomite God”. Through Edom, Christianity is understood.
    Elohé néchar, that is: “a foreign god”.
    Taüth, that is: “an idol”. This word comes from taáh, which in the Hebrew language means “to err” and besides that in the Chaldean language means “to commit fornication” and “to forget”.
    Jiráh, which word actually means a fear, but inauthentically means an idol.
    Avodá sará, which actually means a foreign service, so that a false god is served, and inauthentically also an idol.
    Mólech, which was the name of the Ammonite idol.
    Báal, Bel and Báal Peor, which are idolatrous names.
    Héfel varík, that is: “a vanity and nothingness”, and happens twice a day in their synagogues in a prayer that begins Alénu leschabbéach.
    Talúi and hattalúi, that is: “the hanged man”, because he was nailed to the cross and hanged on it.
    Hammekúllal, that is: “the accursed one”.
    Schóth or náfal, that is: “a fool”.
    Min veepicúrus, that is: a heretic and epicurer.
    Jeschu haraschá, that is: “the godless Jesus”.
    Adám beliáal and haísch habbeliáal, that is: “a worthless and dissolute person” or “villain”.
    Esav, which is “Esau.”
    Mámser, which is: “whore child,” or Mámser ben hannidda, which is: “a whore child, and son of an unclean woman, who was conceived by his mother in the time of her female uncleanness.”
    Ben Stada or Ben Pandira, which is: “the son of Stada” or “the son of Pandira.”
    Ul hassímma, which is: “a child of vice” or “of shame” who has been conceived through a vice committed, namely adultery.
    Nézer Náafuf, that is: “a branch of adultery” or “adulterous branch”.
    Nézer Nitaf, that is: “an abominable” or “detestable branch”.
    Tíuf shíkkuz jelúd hassimma, that is: “an abominable and detestable son of vice”.
    Elóhe toëfóth, that is: “a god of abominations” or “an abominable and detestable god”.
    Ben Chárja, that is: “a son of excrement”.
    Chélah, that is: “a foam” or “uncleanness”.
    Tamé uméth, that is: “an unclean and dead”.
    Hakkélef hamméth, that is: “the dead dog”.
    Othó haïsch or Haïsch hahú or Hahó gáfra, that is: “the same” or “that man” or also Plóni, which means with the Hebrews as much as N.N., and happens this, if they do not announce its name, and want to write something concealed from the same, so that the Christians should not know, whom they mean thereby.
    German Döllinger was the first to succeed in proving that Jesus was not a Jew, but an Aryan, that Christianity comes from an Aryan-Germanic source, that the pre-Jewish and alleged Jewish culture of Palestine was a Germanic one, and therefore the idea instilled in us Germans for 2000 years of the chosen holy people of the Jews, of its world mission and its high cultural value, proves to be a gross falsification and an evil, calculated deception.
    “Nazi” was (and is) the Jews’ spiteful pejorative for Aryan people from the “island” Nazareth.
    “Slav(e)” is an invention of the Jew, just like their “Khazar” blender.

    Matthaeus 3:7
    But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

  391. @Sue Dunham

    “Is that why Jesus calls himself the Morning Star which is the planet Venus and the goddess of love?”

    Do YOU understand Jesus Christ at all?!

  392. 36 ulster says:
    @Winifred Wagner

    I appreciate the Talleyrandian reference. Yes, it was a mistake, worse than a crime.

  393. anon[111] • Disclaimer says:

    this guy writes like a teenage woman

  394. @James Forrestal

    One might commend you and your comment for connecting the dots, but it would be more to the point to commend you instead for noticing, in the face of the distractions society now overwhelms us with, that connectable dots are present. Either way, very well done.

    Between the start of this century and roughly four years ago (since which time age and failing health have conspired to cut me off from most aspects of terrestrial life), I noticed a trend in academic publishing that struck me as odd: an ever-increasing interest in finding insight, wisdom, and (oddest of all) utility in the thought of David Hume.

    As the bulk of what I read amounted to heavily annotated hot air,* I wrote the trend off as little more than a marginal aspect of the nihilistic refashioning of past and present by (((society’s masters))). Your comments here and elsewhere, however, are of a piece with other things that have opened my eyes to the genuine utility that a radical Humean denial of the truth content in the evidence of one’s senses can have for people who wish to reshape human nature in such a way that the very concept of sexual depravity will become an inconceivability.

    Were I even a few years younger and healthier, I know I would be scared out of my wits. Why, I wonder, don’t more of those who are more or less young and healthy react similarly?
    _____________
    *I suppose that might pass muster as a workaday definition of pilpul.

  395. Eschew the word gay. That’s their word. Use your own words.

    Call it the cocksucker’s disco if you want.

  396. Anon[354] • Disclaimer says:
    @Emslander

    I got news for you, buddy.

    Those commenters are right.

  397. Hallelue says:

    Ukraine is only 1% jewish.
    In 2018 and 2019, both the President and Prime Minister of Ukraine were both jewish. The statistical chances of this happening BY CHANCE is only 1 out of 10,000.
    I would say Zelensky was installed fraudulently.
    I feel sorry for the Ukraine people, who have trapped themselves into a corrupt government.

  398. @Emslander

    Someone who “believes in” all of “the” bible as the inerrant word of God criticizing gobblydegook? That’s a real lack of self-awareness.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  399. @Hibernian

    Please explain why any of that is a “fact.”

  400. Emslander says:
    @RadicalCenter

    And good luck to you, too, Kemosabe.

  401. @Priss Factor

    You’re probably Greg Johnson himself always with the same lies to protect homosexuality

    “homophobia is jewish”, “people are homophobic because religious books say so” “white homosexuals built the west” etc. “i was born ready to suck dick” etc etc

    This is why homosexuality is the most dysgenic thing there is. Homosexuals have the exact same behavior and morals dogs have, the only difference is dogs don’t know how to lie.

  402. @Freedomstillisntfree

    WAIT WHAT?

    So if whites stop the homo crusade and embrace homosexuality, in your sick gay mind, whites will thrive?

    are you kidding me?

  403. Pierrelly says:
    @Wokechoke

    From David Irving’s Hitler’s War. Krystalnacht, night of the broken glass, Hitler did not order it, was furious on hearing about it ‘set us back two years’ he said.. and what a difference that would have made.
    pedantic point: EMJ uses insure when I think he meant ensure, I looked it up and learned something new today, something that always happens when tuning in to him.

  404. Finding it hard to believe Nazism is rampant throughout a predominately Jewish controlled government should be seen in the light of how many Jewish operatives in position of power there were in the Nazi regime of Germany. Most were very careful to hide their Jewish heritage. It’s hard to put down a people who work EVERY situation to their personal gain. It’s a talent indeed. One might be led to think that such a talent would be alienating and a threat to others, fostering a prejudice on themselves around the globe–oh, wait…

  405. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Thanks. Helpful information. Try plugging in Ernst Zundel in to Google, it’s even more hateful than that for David Duke.
    But when I searched for Zundel on Yandex sites came up like codoh that tell the true story of Mr Zundel.
    I’ll keep that in mind.

  406. Anon[342] • Disclaimer says:

    Another pathetic attempt by a pro putin fascist to imply that patriotic and freedom loving Ukrainians are puppets of cunning Jews and bloodthirsty neo Nazis!!!!

  407. anon[209] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kurt Knispel

    What is a “real Jesus argument”?

    According to the self-described non-denominational Pentecostals (actually Branhamites) I grew up hearing from .. a “real Jesus argument” goes something like this:

    First of all: The Bible is a history book.

    Now… God walked with Adam but Adam was lonely and so God created woman from the rib of Adam and God allowed them both to wander around the garden having access to all that God made.. except for one thing.. the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge (of Good and Evil!) .. to this God commanded specifically not to eat. … And now here is where what I’m about to say will sound crazy unless you know how to read your bible.

    Tell me [insert name] what tempted Eve in the garden? [A snake!]
    If it was already a snake then why was the curse to crawl on it’s belly? [Oh!?]
    The bible says Eve was beguiled by the serpent. What does beguiled mean? [Don’t know!]
    It means seduced into fornication! Eve was seduced into sexual intercourse by the serpent! Intercourse was the first sin! [Oh no!]
    Eve was impregnated by both Adam and the serpent and the results were Able from the seed of God and Cain from the seed of the serpent! [Wow!]
    Now.. what were all those other people already walking the planet if they were neither of the seed of God or of the seed of the serpent?
    They were the missing link! Troglodytes.. part man, part beast. [dumbfounded]

    Women possess a curse of blood. All women are carriers of the serpent seed. Everyone born is predestined to be either of the seed of God or the seed of the serpent. If they are of God’s seed they will eventually, one way or the other, come to “God” and if they are of the serpent seed, no matter how hard they try they will never be acceptable to God because they carry a curse of blood. [1.]

    The Trinity: “I’m a son, a father and a husband – but I’m only one person

    God is dead. If either the son, the father or the husband (which is all ONE PERSON) dies ‘on their way home from work tomorrow’ then no one is walking back through that door – since they (son, father, husband) will be DEAD. God died because all modes of God died.

    [1.] If you mention this would negate free-will they will get angry. If you play along and mention that this could have been but doesn’t Jesus’ blood wash any and all who come to him ..Was not this the entire point? They glitch.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All E. Michael Jones Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2