Gotta keep the shekels rollin’ in, eh, champ?

I noticed the same sentence that you did, with its big giveaway clause:

… current claims of an anti-white genocide in South Africa are obviously exaggerated.

The Afrikaners being Christians, not sellouts to Islam, has rendered them immune to any sympathy from Barrett.

Andrew, your writing has been more reflective recently and that’s all to the good. Earlier, even when I disagreed with what you said (or, more often, with how you said it) I found your work interesting. If you keep the quirky style and dial down the shock treatment you will be seriously influential.

A talented writer is unlikely to abandon the calling because of a self-critical mood. Don’t burn your bridges.

Even the American Revolutionary War was launched under a false flag. Boston Tea Partiers disguised themselves as Indians.

Indeed.

I’ve long found Stan Freberg’s “explanation” of the event very appealing. Perhaps you will, too.

Maybe worth mentioning that Fraser had a Jewish grandfather and appointed a Jew (Zelman Cowen) as Govenor General.
Maybe I should also add that Fraser was also responsible for allowing large scale Muslim immigration into Australia (It started with Muslim Lebanese. Christian Lebanese and Middle East Christians generally had been allowed in, but Muslim immigration was severely limited until Fraser who took that the view that if Christians from a country were acceptable immigrants, then so were non-Christians from that country)
He was a piece of shit.

We get it: you’ve read Dostoevsky. You’re not the only one who has, however.

It’s a pity you haven’t learned what the great man really was trying to teach: how to think and write like something other than a hysterical queen.

… reminds me of kindergarten …

Did he graduate, I wonder?

… a completely unrelated remark about the surf in Eilat, in which “he” expressed “his” fantasy that I was a surfer …

The fool’s self-importance is so impenetrable that he can’t even see when he and it are being mocked.

In sum, being accused by this fraud of an attempt at diversion is nothing to be ashamed of. Diverting readers’ attention from his transparent lies and self-important posturing is an inherently virtuous act.

Proof, please – or have all your viciously slanted Qs consigned to the rubbish-bin.

Indeed. As a writer and thinker, Slavskiy is all bluster and bravado, and his columns draw out similar defects in those who find his pose appealing.

Before accusing Putin of malice, incompetence, treason or whatever, the four basic questions to ask are 1) how much room for manoeuvre does Putin have, I mean in reality, 2) do the actions that he undertakes help him maintain his room of manoeuvre or do they erode it, 3) are the actions that he is accused of not undertaking within or outside his room of manoeuvre, and 4) what effect would such actions have on his room of manoeuvre if he undertook them? The answer to all four, as far as all outsiders are concerned, which means all of you who spill your bile against Putin here, is the same: you don’t know. Afaic, I laud Putin for having chosen a methodical approach that doesn’t turn Ukraine into Gaza. Not every peace is preferrable to war but the end doesn’t justify the means. If you think that it does, you are siding with the devil.

… the degraded level of discourse on this topic at this site.

Look who’s talking!

When the surf isn’t up in Eilat, this hasbara peddler puts his board aside and picks up his laptop. I wonder whether he is as clumsy a surfer as he is a propagandist.

You have picked a very poor example to support your thesis. However cagey Peterson’s replies may be, they prompt the young man addressing him to collapse into a series of ever more preposterous what-ifs as he ineffectually tries to get Peterson to become intellectually and morally incoherent.

Contrary to your contention, Peterson is by no means a clown. An apter metaphor is that he is a very talented used car salesman. The vehicles he offers don’t break down on the road until a week or so after their ninety-day warranty expires.

I know one for sure that has been stopped and the commie Jew mayor of that city is quite angry about it because he wants the police department neutered so blacks can do whatever they want. The consent decree gave him cover so he could avoid personal responsibility.

Some of these [consent decrees] that have not taken effect yet are being eliminated by Trump’s DOJ fortunately.

Yes, that’s what I heard Harmeet Dhillon tell Tucker Carlson. I just hope that she and Trump are as good as their word.

The 2019 Israeli security consultants were running simulations of these sorts of emergencies in hundreds of US police departments. Only the Hebrews didn’t tell the nice white folks in the Police departments that their Yiddish brethren were stoking up black riots too.

The entire country went insane over a negro felon drug addict. Combine that with the entire COVID insanity. Absolutely astonishing.

As the brilliant investment strategist Catherine Austin Fitts said, the black riots and the COVID lockdowns and restrictions together constituted a coordinated FED/Deep State action plan, the object being massive real-estate acquisition at the expense of the middle class—i.e., whites. Unsurprisingly, the (((Deep State))) got what it wanted.

See the first of two interviews with her at the Planet Lockdown site.

The holiday, which was established in 1868, is intended … to pay tribute to fallen loggers.

Yes, it was the day on which widows and mothers of fallen Confederate loggers paid graveside tribute to husbands and sons who died defending their trees and logging rights from what they saw as Yankee exploitation. Fortunately for Americans’ psychic health, our present-day (((chief logrollers))) have almost completely expunged any lingering sense that the rebel loggers might just have had right on their side.

Your comment did please Half Norwegian whom I venture to guess the other half is Jewish.

Whether Russian churches are brimming with worshippers or half empty is irrelevant; Russia has made a comeback from rigid atheism under communism to a Christian revival. And that is much more than any Western country can claim for her spiritual credit.

Most of these chumps are so young they don’t even remember when everybody blamed everything on the Greatest Generation (which this author gets the dates wrong for).

The author does not grasp that age cohorts do not run countries. A tiny minority of elites does that for us. And to us.

The central vexation of this era is this: Finding the USA mentally unprotected, the newly-arrived Ashkenazi Jews infiltrated American universities and pop culture. This was mostly accomplished during the 1930s (hence the moniker Red Thirties) and got us into war by 1941.

Afterward, as Ayn Rand indelicately put it, the culture was cooked. Once the movies, television, and colleges were in alien hands just like the money supply before it, they no longer had to care who made the laws.

As the author proves, minds don’t run anything. Power does. And power proceeds from wealth. Since the wealth-draining era of the US started with the oil shocks of the 1970s, power has trickled up from the people to the Plutocrats.

This is all simple stuff. During the Reagan/Thatcher years it was even admitted openly. Republican democracy was no longer a thing. Money took their place.

Stop reading pop astrology and get into Sam Francis, Kevin Phillips, and other writers of that era who knew what they were talking about.

I first read it here almost three years ago. She’s never denied it. Besides, once it’s been pointed out, it’s pretty easy to see that their interests and writing style are the same.

Wow is this stupid. He doesn’t get the generation years right. He doesn’t know how to use quotation marks. He mixes things together that don’t get mixed. It makes one dizzy, it’s so stupid..

Oh, please! It isn’t easy to keep one’s patience on its leash when an author refers fourteen times in the space of a few paragraphs to “boomers” and stridently insists on the overwhelming harm they have, as an age cohort, collectively done to the larger society. The absurdity of the notion ought to be self-evident.

Indeed, if ever there were a segment of mankind that might with justice be called the Pretentious Intellectual’s Scapegoat of Choice, it’s the set of white Gentiles born between 1946 and 1964.

Moreover, the modus scribendi of Dr. Wolheze leaves one with the creepy feeling that he and Priss Factor/Jung-Freud are siblings under the skin. The two of them incline to the same overwrought pattern of exposition. That is to say, they orient their interminable but unoriginal interpretations of both localized events and tectonic shifts in societal structures around [gulp] movies. It is hard to imagine an approach to a topic, any topic, that is more likely to eventuate in a shallow result.

… a troll, not an honest but misinformed commenter …

Sure.

I’ve been called worse, most often by your fellow supporters of jihad upon the remnants of the Christian West. As I recently wrote elsewhere, “No one in the pro-White camp should ever consent to use ‘racism’ or related words without their accompanying sneer quotes. The insult ‘racist!’ needs neither an answer nor an apology. It is a charge to be regarded with contempt.”

[When] Paul Craig Roberts … started gaslighting [Kevin Barrett] on the European foreigner crime topic – “you’re emotionally involved”, “you’re obviously very sensitive about the Muslims” – Paul lost the argument at that point.

Who precisely is doing the gaslighting now? Surely, in light of KB’s refusal to acknowledge the truth, Dr. Roberts’s quoted remarks are hardly unjustifiable. Indeed, what else could he say, given his evident and laudable desire to maintain decorum?

I’m not a fan of Sailer, as I make very clear in earlier comments elsewhere, e.g. in this thread starting here.

Thank you for your reply. It has confirmed for me that the profound dishonesty, the contempt for truth, and the utter irrationality and fanaticism at the heart of your diabolical “religion” are as active in contemporary Islam as they were in Mohammed’s time and in the following disastrous centuries for Christian Europe.

The god of Islam is no more the True God than the mirror-image god whom Jews say they worship. I shan’t kid myself again that things might have changed for the better. No one should.

On the contrary, I see no necessary correlation between (1) thoughtfulness and (2) openness to commenting. Indeed, since more than 90 percent of comments contribute nothing of value to an article, especially to a good one, absence of permission for them seems to me a matter of no concern.

My opinion might have been influenced by the fact that the man I consider the best political and social essayist of my lifetime, Joseph Sobran, was seldom published in online periodicals where commenting was present. In the vast majority of cases, the only sensible “comment” on a Sobran article was applause.

A truly eloquent comment! Sincere thanks.
__________

P.S. I am (or seem to be) largely recovered from my recent extended flirtation with temporal oblivion. (I am, alas, still old, however.) Thank you again for your generous solicitude.

Thank you for the link to the interview with Sabrosky. Many relevant things in defense of Sabrosky’s departure in disgust might be adduced, but one example will suffice. What is fundamentally mistaken in Kevin Barrett’s analysis is that he relies on government arrest statistics as a basis for his soi-disant debunkings. Figuratively speaking, one has to be in the Muslim prayer position—head on the mat, butt in the air—to miss the fact that, throughout Europe, Oceania, and the USA, law-enforcement agencies are in the hands of Jews and their goyishe agents, who simply do not arrest members of designated victim groups for crimes that would bring the full force of the police state down upon whites—and does indeed actively do so.

Steve Sailer, Curated Noticer Supreme and self-anointed debunker-in-chief of conventional wisdom, also expects readers to accept the veracity of similar rubbishy statistics. For example, he has written often of the major decline of criminality in New York City since the nineties. He does this despite the fact that, at least since the start of the Bloomberg administration, official sources frequently stated for the public record that Hispanics and especially blacks would be charged and prosecuted on a far more lenient basis for criminal activity with an eye to addressing “historic inequities” in enforcement. In practice, for blacks, this has worked out to murder being downsized to involuntary manslaughter and aggravated assault being dismissed in toto or reduced to a release with a warning to behave better in future.

Had Sailer taken the trouble to ask any long-time New Yorker—me or any of my neighbors, to offer a homely example—whether he felt safer in his home or in public than he did in the nineties, he would have gotten no support for his absurd claims. With even stronger applicability, the same might be said, mutatis mutandis, for Kevin Barrett.

Ordinary, sensible white people used to say, “Figures don’t lie, but liars will figure.” Alas, anyone nowadays who is found guilty of exercising good sense, especially anent such topics as blacks, illegal aliens, immigration, and crime, is liable to be branded a racist or, if he’s lucky, simply a dupe or a fool. Which of these rubrics does Kevin Barrett apply to Dr. Roberts and Dr. Sabrosky?

…am I expected to believe that the reported atrocities in Rotherham, wider knowledge of which was suppressed for several years, are also nothing more than the product of anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant propaganda?

I followed the Rotherham story as closely as an outsider could, and I agree with the overall sentiment here.

Even in American cities, men from these countries are pests. What I hear might be anecdotal but it is broad and cumulative. Women are asked for “kisses”, hectored about going on a “date” — and I speak of adult women here.

Whether in the UK, the States, or anywhere else, we do not need these people. Invest in training our own young workers, invest in better technology, and in the name of all the gods ramp up an employment system for our own people so the industrial boomers can retire.

This issue is meant to wind us up over who gets into an already dysfunctional economy. Let’s take care of our own. We have enough divisiveness among ourselves. Muslims need to be pointed to Muslim countries where they will be happy to live. And we’ll be happy without them.

Your Judaic compulsion to write the same bullshit twice tells me all I need to know about you.

Apropos safety in France, I am a Traditionalist Roman Catholic, and I know a great many people who make regular pilgrimages to the Marian shrines in Lourdes and and several other locales. They all speak to me of the overwhelming increase in vicious assaults, all of them perpetrated by young Muslim men. The pilgrim groups have had to develop elaborate safety protocols to protect themselves from these violent criminals, whose hatred of Catholics and Catholicism is plainly an aggravating factor.

Let me shift the focus for a moment to Britain. With respect, Mr. Barrett, am I expected to believe that the reported atrocities in Rotherham, wider knowledge of which was suppressed for several years, are also nothing more than the product of anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant propaganda? Was the cover-up of these crimes nothing more than an elaborate Jewish ruse—that is, merely a make-believe suppression—to persuade me and others whom you seem to regard as little more than mindless immigrant haters to view Britain’s Muslim enrichment as something else entirely: a hostile invasion facilitated by those who serve our Jewish masters?

If you are anti-semite, you are against the Palestinian.

As a trial lawyer might say, you assume facts not in evidence. The plain fact that is in evidence is that the Jews’ endless cries of distress over claimed anti-Semitism are invariably self-oriented. They never encompass reference to the suffering, real or imagined, of any other Semites.

Not an instructive piece.

Your description could aptly be applied to everything that has ever appeared here under Smuskiewicz’s byline. What can have possessed Ron Unz to publish this cliché-addicted mediocrity?

[The author’s] naïveté is noted and explains some of his stuff here.

With respect, I think that “naïveté” is an overly charitable assessment, Joe. AJS writes in the same pseudo-psychoanalytic mode one regularly encounters among the most drivelly pretentious of TUR authors and commenters—Jung-Freud being a prominent example. Like them, he is never content simply to point out the activities or perspectives he finds counterproductive, perilous, or simply useless and then offer a rational explanation for why he considers them such. Rather, he invariably resorts to “medicalized” substitutes for genuinely informative explanations.

As an exercise in turnabout, if I were to borrow Smuskiewicz’s modus scribendi in characterizing Trump’s work and apply it to AJS, I should simply say that he plainly writes as he does because he is a typically muttonheaded Slav. How’s that for an insight-rich takeaway!

You don’t have to go with Jesus, but you do have to go through the Son to get to the Father IMO. IF you believe in Jesus then you know He came to fight AGAINST Jewish racism/supremacism. The average Jew doesn’t read the New Testament, in fact some hardcore zealots in muh Israel burn the NT. The Jew has infiltrated the Christian churches. This is where the worship the Jew, don’t pay attention to his hatred of Jesus and Christianity, just keep being peaceful as lambs led to slaughter comes from brought to you by the J People. The Izzies and the Joos are no friends of Christianity and fact is Christianity is the polar opposite of Judaism. IF our leaders and churches were really Christians then #110 would have happened decades ago. I don’t believe in forcing my beliefs on anyone, however, so whatever you want to believe in is fine with me as long as you respect my right to believe as I choose. Live and let live is what I say, up to a point of course. Blacks, Jews, and others have exploited the goodwill and naïveté of Whites for far too long. One thing that is a FACT and not an opinion is that America was FAR better off when it was 85% White and probably 75% Christian at the time.

Bon soir e tu, mon copain.

Pretty close. What you’re looking for is “Bonsoir à toi, mon copain.”

Dors bien, mon ami.

At least since the 1960s the world has been fed, nonstop, the “narrative” of the Holocaust in movies, books and other media. We’ve been told and shown and told again that H.caust was the greatest calamity ever — no, the only calamity that matters in human history.

Israel and its Neanderthal prime minister Netanyahu are ready for a challenge. Anything the swastika-wearing influencers could do, Israelis can do better. Our greatest, best, only friend in the Middle East has raised the curtain on Holocaust 2: The Sequel with No Equal. Here comes another narrative with a new victim class and a new oppressor. Something about a shoe on the other foot comes to mind.

… a television drama, title something like Holocaust, a soap-opera-like miniseries.a television drama, title something like Holocaust, a soap-opera-like miniseries.

Yup, that’s it. Alas, unlike you, I am old enough to remember it, although I certainly didn’t watch even a minute of it.

Here’s a link to IMDB. More’s the pity, it was a lace-curtain job all the way down the line, with A-list actors in major roles.

… these remigration fellows all appear to be on the preppy rich kid side.

Well spotted! They do indeed.

Who could trust or admire a bunch of guys who are so in thrall to le dernier cri that they all wear trousers that are as tight as jockey shorts? What are they trying to prove—or reveal? Three cheers for trousers that you can don with your shoes on!

[wink]

Jews will abuse it just like they abuse everything, but that’s not an excuse to act like the technology itself is evil.

I did not write that AI technology was evil. Indeed, I am pretty sure that no one has, not least because such a charge would be contextually irrelevant. Contextually speaking, it surely ought to suffice that AI systems are unreliable, in that they are programmed to mislead.

AI will come back and bite people in the ass.

You have really nailed it this time, my friend. Even if there were an AI device that hadn’t been programmed and corrupted from the get-go by Jews—i.e., I find it hard to believe that there is a genuinely “honest” one—what can it tell a man with more than half a brain who is willing to slog through and weigh evidence and draw his own conclusions?

To take an utterly homely example, many an Amazon review section is now preceded by an AI’s summation of the reviewers’ opinions. Yet even with so simple a task set before it, all the AI seems able to deliver is an unnuanced statement of the entire range of pluses and minuses mentioned in the reviews. That is to say, for example, the unsupported opinions of three semiliterate individuals about the effectiveness of, say, a bread-bag clip won’t get weighed and placed in proper proportion by the AI with the contrary opinions of perhaps a hundred rather more articulate individuals whose reviews say precisely the opposite.

As you hint, such “counsel” or “guidance” is hardly likely to benefit one’s portfolio, much less save one’s soul.

Another figure like Father Coughlin, though much more erudite than Coughlin, was Jesuit priest Fr. Leonard Feeney, S.J. (1897-1978). Wikipedia says Feeney “was described as Boston’s homegrown version of Father Charles Coughlin for his antisemitism.” Feeney did his graduate study at Oxford and was a professor at Boston College. Feeney was the only guest host that Fulton Sheen allowed to fill in for him on Sheen’s national popular radio program. Feeney ran St. Benedict’s center which was off of Harvard Square and which proselytized a lot of Harvard and Radcliffe students into becoming Catholic. One Harvard student who converted to Catholicism, and later became a theologian and cardinal in the Catholic Church, was the late Avery Cardinal Dulles, the son John Foster Dulles and nephew of Allen Dulles.

Cardinal Dulles defended Fr. Feeney until his dying days. https://www.americamagazine.org/sites/default/files/attachments/Feeney.pdf

Father Feeney and his followers in Boston produced literature and gave talks critical of Jews. Almost all of the information and intelligence was provided to the Boston FBI by the ADL and other entities such as the Jewish organizations called “Military Intelligence Association of New England” and “National Counter Intelligence Corps Association.” Coincidentally, all of these groups were located at the very same address as the ADL at 72 Franklin Street, Suite 504, Boston, Massachusetts.

You can see this correspondence (from FOIA) at the link below. It’s from the 1950’s.

https://archive.org/details/LeonardFeeney

Race? You didn’t even qualify for a starting position.

You say Christianity has destroyed white civilization multiple times, yet were it not for the Medieval Scholastics, there would be neither the conceptual tools nor vocabulary that made science possible. Science was stillborn in every ancient civilization and non-Christian Medieval land, and it was solely the joining of reason and faith within the Christian understanding of reality in which science could arise.

The great strides in civilization were made among the white races mainly because they were Christian, not in spite of it. Your condescension implies you’ve studied Christian art, architecture, music, science, theology, ethics, morals, and the resultant ordering of society and found it all wanting in light of . . . what exactly? What exactly is that view from nowhere of yours about things that never existed?

First step is to stop cringing when one is labelled a racist. There is much to be racist about.

Absolutely! Moreover, the very concept of “racism,” which the (((Establishment))) expects all to regard as a grievous offense against moral thought and praxis, is merely a rhetorical construct designed to bully and intimidate. (I know that the foregoing will come as news to few, if any, who frequent this site.)

No one in the pro-White camp should ever consent to use “racism” or related words without their accompanying sneer quotes. The insult “racist!” needs neither an answer nor an apology. It is a charge to be regarded with contempt.

Thanks, Pierre, always truthful and to the point.

The funny thing is that even in Marx, the most determined leftist globalist subversive is unable to find authority for anything like Open Borders and certainly not for the subversion of nations.

Had Christianity viewed things otherwise, nations would have disintegrated long ago.

Had Communism proposed otherwise, they’d have been without followers.

You can bring Christianity to the world without bringing the world into White nations.

This is indeed the bottom line, in that it accords precisely with what is called the Great Commission. Per Mt 28:19–20, the relevant words of Christ to the Apostles are “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. …” In short, bring the Gospel to the world, not the other way around.

Passive voice does not always equal to competent thinking or better writing. … Bin’s version is to compare and DGAF’s version is to assert.

I suggest that the comparison/assertion distinction is an overstatement. Whatever one thinks of DGAF’s manners—granted, they are pretty deplorable—the plain fact is that neither he nor Hua Bin used the passive. Both sentences are active-voice constructions.

DGAF’s replacement sentence does indeed clarify Hua Bin’s point, but I doubt whether readers who speak and read English fluently needed further clarification.

Left-wing people are higher in Neuroticism than people that are right-wing. … Powell is less able to control her emotions because being high in Neuroticism makes you emotionally unstable, but it also means you feel very strongly things like resentment, anger and even cognitive dissonance. … [She] is likely to simply be low in empathy. There are a number of studies on how left-wing people are lower in generalized empathy than right-wing people. They are lower in Agreeableness. They are unkind, they are Machiavellian, as noted earlier, and they are perfectly happy to see people as a means to an end.

Although I am very largely in agreement with the quoted remarks, it strikes me that almost everything that Dutton has written for TOO, TUR, and other non-academic White-interest online publications during the past year or two reads like the material above. That is to say, the pejorative characterizations roll far too glibly off his keyboard for this reader’s comfort. It is psychoanalysis-while-u-wait.

My point is that this is a public forum, one with a certain level of dignity and intellectual respectability. It is not a local pub or a private chat room, where the sorts of capsule diagnoses that might pass muster among likeminded friends and comrades who have thrashed out the topic thoroughly among themselves over the course of months or years might be regarded as appropriate. If the object is to win other White people over to our perspective—and surely that is important to all of us—Dutton at least ought to offer a few links to studies or discussions that contain data or evidence that, as he avers, support his generalizations. As his remarks now stand, someone new to this site might readily be forgiven for considering them little more than a collection of upmarket insults.

If, as he would have us believe, Dutton is fully committed to the cause of exposing and reversing the (((alien))) takeover of the West, he ought to stop writing like a participant in a comment thread and return to writing like a serious essayist.

In the case of the UK, it wasn’t “these leftist fuckers” alone. Enoch Powell was tossed from the Conservative Party for complaining about the number of “asiatic sand-nigger paki scum” (along with Indians and West Indians) being allowed in. They’ve all been in on it, because the merchant class knew it was good for them.

Indeed. Priss Factor/Jung-Freud does here what she does everywhere else: pursue a crypto-Jew agenda of subversion and misdirection. Fortunately, she is as predictable and shallow as the Hollywood movies she adores and thus does minimal damage. Moreover, her likeminded fans do us the favor of revealing themselves with their applause for her.

You can always be relied upon to write something even stupider and shallower than this site’s already depressing norm.

The first thing I’d do is discredit the PCR as the fraud it is.

Would you also want to discredit the Pythagorean theorem for determining a right triangle’s hypotenuse if some government astronomy czar decreed that it was henceforth the surest way to determine the right ascension of a point on the celestial equator? What you should understand is that Fauci’s ukase anent the PCR process—note that it isn’t a test!—did something quite as absurd and false in the scientific and medical domains as the absurd example offered in my previous sentence.

Nobel laureate Kary Mullis, the inventor of the process, said innumerable times that the PCR process was useless for determining the presence or absence of any disease in the human body. Indeed, Mullis could hardly have been clearer. Note, too, that Mullis despised Fauci and had been denouncing him in interviews and journal articles since the days Fauci dominated the headlines as the “hero” of the AIDS crisis, despite the fact that Fauci was a mass murderer whose weapon of choice was AZT, a 100 percent effective DNA chain terminator.

Fauci in his turn hated Kary Mullis and Peter Duesberg, two authentic heroes of science. Had Mullis not died prematurely a few months prior to the start of the COVID hullabaloo, he would have been the acknowledged and ferociously condemned leader of the resistance movement to both the COVID hoax and Fauci the criminal megalomaniac.

You are making the ‘consensus’ error. Scientific truth is not established by consensus, but by evidence and testing. Medicine is so corrupt at present (how can it be otherwise when you are talking about trillion dollar tidal waves of money), that ‘consensus’ will always be had around conclusions that lead to more money/power. (Aside: by the way ‘Climate Science’ suffers from the same corruption).

I am a Scientist, and worked in Medicine the last 15 years or so, of my career. I am old enough to remember the AIDS nightmare well. When I first saw Fauci in 2020, I had two thoughts, 1) my God, is this guy still alive? and 2) we are doomed.

I know this article is primarily about AIDS, however, I was more trusting with the AIDS lies, but with Covid, I smelled a rat instantly. In April 2020, I told my son it was a construct, which got out due to a lack of containment at WVI. I had read this paper, which was essentially a blueprint for how the virus was created.

A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

Vineet D Menachery1, Boyd L Yount Jr1, Kari Debbink1,2, Sudhakar Agnihothram3, Lisa E Gralinski1, Jessica A Plante1, Rachel L Graham1, Trevor Scobey1, Xing-Yi Ge4, Eric F Donaldson1, Scott H Randell5,6, Antonio Lanzavecchia7, Wayne A Marasco8,9, Zhengli-Li Shi4 & Ralph S Baric1,2

VOLUME 21 | NUMBER 12 | DECEMBER 2015 nature medicine

Didier Raoult (France) is one of the most famous infectious disease experts in the World and when his initial work with HCQ was suppressed, I knew the fix was in, along with the lightening like ‘approval’ of the vaccine (I had written hundreds of pages of documentation for regulatory submissions). That along with the fact that all the people dying in Italy at the start of the pandemic, were the same age as people dying in Italy the year before, told me there was nothing to fear. I am over 70, probably had covid 3 times (first was before anyone knew much. Treated with ivermectin and vitamins. No mask (my degree is in Chemical Physics), no ‘6-feet’, no Covid test ever, and sure as hell, no ‘vaccine’.

More details are still coming out. I assumed Ralph Baric had designed the virus, and Zhengli-Li Shi was in charge of the failed containment. Now it appears that a Dr. Vincent Munster was the source, by modifying Baric’s design to make the virus transmissible, and Dr. Danielle Anderson was in charge of the lab at WVI where the virus ‘escaped’. So 100% American ‘product’.

https://dailysceptic.org/2024/01/30/is-this-the-man-who-created-covid-19-in-faucis-u-s-lab/

Like all those tale tales of racist interactions, that literally never happened.

A breathless world eagerly awaits your follow-up comment, doubtless with full YouTube documentation and testimony. Have a better day.

Precisely! Please count me on board with both of you.

To amplify a bit, three of the four men who have been US president in this century have been witless and avaricious. Morever, rather than being simply venal, they have actually courted venality.

Trump is far from witless, but his first term exhibited the marks of his besetting vice: the deadly sin of Sloth. I truly hope that his current term will, at its end in January 2029, be seen to be much better, but in truth I sustain nothing more substantial than that hope.

Steinbrenner must have been blackmailing the Royals.
Trump does seem to have deteriorated mentally, if that
were possible, compared to his first term. Still, it’s
unlikely that he’s crazy enough to annex Taiwan.

My wife deserves all the credit for keeping me humble.
Melania Trump is not doing her job, but she did
pick one crazy critter to tame.

You replied thus to PM’s comment about [ahem] genius Kanye as a presidential candidate:

Given what we got, would anyone notice?

Precisely! Please count me on board with both of you.

Virtually everything on the domestic front coming from the Democrats, mainstream and social media, public broadcasting, and the universities is about preventing the races from finding some common ground resulting in a well-ordered society grounded in Christian ethics. PBS, from what I can see, is going all out to pander to black grievances, and that’s when, like CNN and MSNBC, they’re not opening old wounds and cynically throwing salt on them to incite black-on-white violence and resentment.

These American- and Christian-hating elites, whose vanguard is nearly always Jewish, are the very same people responsible for herding blacks into inhuman projects devoid of a trace of human scale where, by design, nothing but resentment, crime, and hopelessness grows in the dank shadows cast by these nightmarish buildings that were built to create and control Democrat voting blocs in the inner cities of America.

Unfortunately, blacks have bought into the premise of all liberal do-good programs for blacks, which is that the “schvartzes” are incapable of telling right from wrong or behaving as adults, with adult black women twerking on top of cop cars in front of their children serving as strong evidence this TV brainwashing works.

The bulk of them [i.e., scoffers, slanderers, and others with what seems a disordered, deranged hatred of Christianity] are bitter, lonely, childless, and eternally angry old men.

On the contrary, at this site and many others, a majority of them are clearly men under fifty, perhaps even forty. Some of them are pretty obvious Jewish plants—i.e., agents of infiltration and disruption. (Newbie commenter “same old same old” looks like one such, and he isn’t the only one on this thread.) Others, many of whom mean well, have been misled by factors that no amount of off-the-cuff “analysis” will ever adequately explain. My point is that few of us have a talent for mind-reading. I certainly don’t.

From time to time, virtually everyone succumbs to the temptation to dismiss other people with casual generalizations or to respond to them with sharp-tongued rebukes—I’ve been as guilty of this as many others—but the ensuing satisfactions are shallow and short-lived. Moreover, they gain nothing.

Since the time of the Twelve, missionaries have won converts by means of good example and patient exposition, both coupled with the sort of deep faith that can light up a room. Above all else, they have prayed. We who are Christians should do likewise.

I’m not aware of a single individual who thinks the “culture war” is important who doesn’t also support Israel and claim Chinese people are communists who want to take away our gay rights and women’s liberation.

Kevin MacDonald thinks culture is very important, but he also scorns Israel and never engages in reflexive China bashing. The foregoing is also true of most of his site’s past and present contributors—notably Andrew Joyce, Brenton Sanderson, Tobias Langdon, and Ed Connelly—and habitués.

Of course, this is not news to AA. My point is that the quoted sentence is one of many instances of deliberate hyperbole in Anglin’s largely excellent essay. Here, as elsewhere, recognizing the characteristics of his style is essential to proper understanding.

Is this written by a woman?

As my father would say “you can’t tell the difference between a horse and a jackass in a dark barn until he opens his mouth.”

Those of us who don’t own a barn have been excluded by this oppressive society from a vast range of metaphoric observation. Your reminder of my deprivation has hurt my feelings. I think that my hurt feelings entitle me to reparations—in cash, not in farm buildings. Moreover, someone out there surely needs to be doxxed!*
___________
*WHIMSICALITY ALERT!

I’d never heard of Mo Khan before today. While I certainly wish no one harm at the hands of a Jew, I find Khan’s statement, in which he moves to snatch the Victim Tag from Portnoy and apply it to himself, to be offputting in the extreme.

My energy and emotional resources are limited, and I shall not expend them in aiding a virulent Muslim enemy of the historical USA and the traditional West in his quarrel with a virulent Jewish enemy. In short, Jews and Muslims are both my foes. I shall not wittingly bolster the position of either.

I think his crass language is more of a valve. Kind of a screw everything including your mom attitude.

Although I don’t share your conclusion, I’d be foolish to deny that there is, shall we say, a great deal of data to support it.

It can get a little complicated from the geopolitical perspective.

Your comment did a fine job of pointing out most of the biggest complications. H/t.

Surely the lesson that Americans and other Westerners should draw from the endless conflicts of these almost numberless people is that allowing—indeed, welcoming—more of them into our countries is daylight madness.

Indeed it is. A man who plainly can’t say “Good morning” without ornamenting the greeting with three or four snarling uses of the f-word has no right to toleration, let alone deference.

I don’t agree. I think that Anglin has always been a serious writer. The over-the-top stuff, especially the sometimes shockingly vulgar language, has as a rule been little more than window dressing calculated to attract readers for whom uncamouflaged seriousness is offputting. At some point in his life, however, virtually every serious writer grows too weary of the camouflage to persist with it. Anglin seems to have got to that point.

Tom Wolfe also fit the profile above. When I bought and read the just-published Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby in 1966, it was the unprecedented brilliance of his verbal imagery that knocked me for a loop. It took me about ten years to see past the flash and realize that he was no mere entertainer but rather a profound thinker.

Ron has paid Jung-Freud to take over the Anglin franchise.

Thank heaven that this comment is a gag.

The shoddiness and shallowness of that woman’s* thought, expression, and analysis are as ubiquitous as they are dispiriting to encounter. A further aggravating characteristic is her relentless, indeed reflexive, substitution of a mode of apprehension derived from (((Hollywood films))) for the traditional Western mode premised on self-knowledge. I am aware of nothing she has ever written that suggests that she has even a passing acquaintance with introspection.

Commenter Rebel Roy, in comment no. 10 on J-F’s overwritten featured article from last week—as ever, the article coarsely slanders white men and white women with equal vigor and malice—wrote, “You come off as a hasbara Jew.” I wish that others would see what he saw.
_________________
*Jung-Freud = Priss Factor = Andrea Ostrov Letania

Being bereft of brains and looks, I defy your negative correlation.

Yours is both the smartest and the most morally appealing comment in this entire thread. H/t!

Moreover, I think that you needn’t have backed away quite so much from your earlier characterization of Taiwan as being an object of US annexation. Just as colonialism was largely superseded by the far more effectively exploitative practice of neocolonialism—i.e., running the show from the wings rather than from a hogged center stage—so too might discreet de facto annexation, masquerading as near-total commercial cooperation, be more all-encompassing and harder to combat than de jure annexation. I think that that is precisely the intention of (((our masters))).

Another analogy, if I may. Back in the sixties and early seventies, the New York Yankees made so many sweetheart trades and deals with the Kansas City Athletics that sportswriters and fans, both pro- and anti-Yankee, often referred to KC as the Yankees’ big-league farm team. It turned out, as many know, that the jokes and gripes were true. Alas, the US Deep State will be rather harder to corral than George Steinbrenner.

Its nice to have you writing again.

The Roosevelt Administration was rightly focused on maintaining the wartime alliance with the Soviet Union.

I do not mean to be snarky in saying that I find it impossible either to agree or disagree with the quoted sentence. I say this because I see in it so many inherently unfounded presumptions and begged questions that several paragraphs would be needed simply to list them all.

Sincere thanks to you for adding a link to one of Kevin McDonald’s most trenchant articles. (Considering the superlative quality of all of KM’s work, that’s saying a lot.) I was delighted to read it in 2018 because I just missed its initial appearance nine years earlier.

For me, in some ways the most important thing about KM’s article is that it will indicate to a close and careful reader the difference between what I consider the new distortions, so to speak, inherent in Ron Unz’s perspective* on the present question and a genuinely hard-as-nails, tabula rasa approach to the history and the facts.
___________
*That is to say, I respectfully consider the readiness to read Mr. Unz uncritically—a readiness evinced by the initial commenter in this thread and by many, many others—to be a grave error of judgment.

Thank you for asking, my friend. The answer to your question is still no, I’m afraid, but on the occasions when I feel up to it, I drift over here to try to regain a sense of what’s happening in the larger world outside, if only from the sidelines. Frankly, in so doing, I sometimes feel analogous to a guy suffering from lung cancer who has a pack of Camels taped to the bottom of his oxygen tank.

Stay well yourself, and keep fighting for the side of the angels!

After enduring the present recording, I have decided that listening to Gregory Hood prattle on endlessly is a penance I shall permanently forgo in favor of one with fewer pains and frustrations—one such as wearing a hair shirt for ten hours a day. I just hope I don’t thereby miss out on too many of Carlton Meyer’s great videos.

The present discussion—an exercise in self-indulgence—got off entirely on the wrong foot with one of the shallowest, most poorly informed descriptions of the 1990s USA I have ever had the misfortune to hear. Hood really shouldn’t be allowed to speak in public without Daddy present. Jared Taylor, lock up the computer when you leave the house!

… by the time of the Vietnam War, the presence of angry blacks in a unit’s ranks became that unit’s worst liability in combat …

What you write was certainly true when I was in Vietnam (’67–’68). For four months I worked with a LRP unit, an all-volunteer force all but one of whose members were white. Several of them told me flat out that the primary reason they applied to be LRPs was that their experience in regular infantry units led them to the conviction that black soldiers’ lack of discipline overall and, above all, lack of reliability in a firefight would get them killed.

A fine and highly informative comment. Thank you.

As the writer of comment 158 indicated, the incident you relate is indeed remarkable, not least for its brazenness. Nowhere in the West would anyone but a Jew be permitted to respond so illegally and venomously to the mere expression in a public forum of an informed opinion about the remote past.

You don’t let the wolf in to teach their evil. Evil has to be interdicted–and for the Jews—Christians and Europeans are Amalek–Nazis. … America is a Jewish theocracy; Democracy is THAT Theocracy and anti-racism is the Moral Code of the American College system. America is a Jewish state–and it brooks NO dissent!

Indeed, as your reminiscence indicates, there are no lengths to which the Jewish state recognizes no rational or moral limitations on its power to define and suppress crimethink. With the florid window treatments stripped away, such is revealed to be the satanic nature of what the Jews term democracy.

I wish I could recall who it was who characterized democracy as the system of governance wherein two wolves and a sheep get to vote on what’s for lunch. Worse still, of course, in our Judaized democracy, were the sheep-to-wolf ratio even 100 to 1, the wolf’s one vote would end up being the only vote that was allowed to count.

He was a flawed man on the side of the angels.

Succinct, apt, and true. Who could ask for more?

H/t.

Ron Unz reads numerous sources and weaves them artfully, but no one can read them all.

Thus suggesting that Henry Morgenthau, Jr. is just a “gentleman farmer” is inaccurate.

Closer to accurate is to call him FDR’s handler.

According to Morgenthau biographer Peter Moreira’s The Jew Who Defeated Hitler, based on Morgenthau’s extensive diaries and research at Hyde Park, the Treasury Secretary conversed with FDR on an almost daily basis.

True enough that Harry Dexter White was said to be “Morgenthau’s brain,” but Henry transmitted the signals to the president. Morgenthau was also a conduit to FDR for the indefatigable Rabbi Stephen Wise, who was, himself, at the nexus of the jewish zionist activists most responsible for promoting/provoking the world wars in Europe and USA involvement in them, a network that included Louis D. Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter (who had back-channel direct communication with Churchill), Louis Untermyer, Chaim Weizmann, etc., and the organizations they created.

Morgenthau was responsible for the payroll-deduction system of worker’s income taxation and for bond schemes, both to finance the war; for early development of manufacture of aircraft to fight a war in which USA was not yet involved; for creation of war refugee board that benefited primarily Jewish migrants to USA, among others.

Citizen Cohn is quite good, also has some details on his corrupt parents (father a crooked judge, mother hiding the proceeds of father’s crime then pretending to be broke to avoid asset seizures).

It is too affectionate in treating its subject and his parents, but to a clear-thinking reader, it is very damning.

Rather than “reinvented,” I’d lean toward “relabeled.” The word chosen, however, makes little or no real difference in context. In toto, I quite agree with your comment. Thanks for offering it.

… Communism has been relegated to merely an unpleasant chapter in the history books …

Has it? Or has it rather become embedded as the keystone and the guiding light of American governance?

My conclusion was that the Evans book was merely a whitewash and McCarthy and McCarthyism was actually very much like the MSM had always portrayed them.

“Whitewash” is, I think, simply unjust. Indeed, my own reading inclines me much more favorably to Evans and rather less so to Herman than yours has done.

Nonetheless, the truth or otherwise of the McCarthyism tag, is, I fear, destined to be a vexed question for some time to come. Extended debate, especially of the acrimonious sort, might quickly become a distraction from Trump-related and other matters of more immediate and very critical concern.

Overall, however, this is surely, along with your Shakespeare authorship piece, one of your finest, most closely argued essays of the past two years. Thank you.

… many Irish Roman Catholics are indeed anti-semitic …

Would that this were true! [wink]

In fact, far, far too few are alert to organized Jewish malefaction—a rather more accurate term than the empty smear “anti-Semitism.”