Eternal Slave wrote:

Czechoslovakia is not an artificial, but an organic state that united Czechs and Slovaks (on the same principle Yugoslavia united most of the South Slavic nations).

Yeah right.
We all saw how ‘united’ the Serbs and Croats were during WWII, as they committed one atrocity after another on each other.
Similarly, there is nothing ‘organic’ about the Czechs and Slovaks being thrust together.

Mr Slave, you are undoubtedly one of the premier KNN’s (Know-Nothing-Nitwits) I have ever encountered.

You write: “The creation of Czechoslovakia also meant the liberation of the Czech land after 300 years of the Habsburg yoke and German oppression. Within Czechoslovakia, the revival of the free Czech land and the historical thousand-year-old Czech statehood took place.”

My response: Czech citizens were hardly happy in their “free Czech land” in the late 1930s.

Czech leaders realized that the excitement among the Sudeten Germans after Germany’s Anschluss with Austria would soon force the resolution of their Sudeten question. The Czech cabinet and military leaders decided on May 20, 1938, to order a partial mobilization of the Czech armed forces. This partial mobilization was based on the false accusation that German troops were concentrating on the Czech frontiers. Czech leaders hoped that the resulting confusion would commit the British and French to the Czech position before a policy favoring concessions to the Sudeten Germans could be implemented. Although the plot failed, Czech leaders granted interviews in which they claimed that Czechoslovakia had scored a great victory over Germany. An international press campaign representing that Czechoslovakia had forced Hitler to back down from his planned aggression reverberated around the world. (Source: Hoggan, David L., The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed, Costa Mesa, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1989, pp. 106-107).

British Ambassador to Germany Nevile Henderson believed that the Czech mobilization of its army, and the ridicule heaped upon Hitler by the world press, led directly to the Munich Agreement. (Source: Henderson, Sir Nevile, Failure of a Mission, New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1940, pp. 142-143).

British Foreign Minister Halifax informed French leaders on July 20, 1938, that a special fact-finding mission under Lord Runciman would be sent to Czechoslovakia. President Beneš of Czechoslovakia was disturbed by this news. It was a definite indication that the British might adopt a compromising policy toward Germany in the crisis. The British mission completed its study in September 1938, and it reported that the main difficulty in the Sudeten area had been the disinclination of the Czechs to grant reforms. This British report was accompanied by the final rupture of negotiations between the Sudeten Germans and the Czech leaders. The Czech crisis was coming to a climax. (Source: Hoggan, David L., The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed, Costa Mesa, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1989, p. 108).

The Munich Agreement was signed in the early hours of September 30, 1938. The Sudeten Germans had become a part of Germany. Chamberlain and Hitler signed a joint declaration that the Munich Agreement and the Anglo-German naval accord symbolized “the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with each other again.” Chamberlain told the cheering crowd in London that welcomed him home, “I believe it is peace in our time.” (Source: Chamberlain, William Henry, America’s Second Crusade, Chicago: Regnery, 1950, p. 55).

A crisis developed in Czechoslovakia after the Munich Agreement. The German, Polish, and Hungarian minorities had been successfully separated from Czech rule. However, the Slovaks and Ruthenians were also eager to escape from Czech rule, and they received encouragement from Poland and Hungary. (Source: Hoggan, David L., The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed, Costa Mesa, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1989, p. 227).

Increasingly serious internal difficulties faced the Czech state, and in early 1939 the Czech problem with Slovakia deteriorated rapidly. The climax of the Slovak crisis occurred on March 9, 1939, when the Czech government dismissed the four principal Slovak ministers from the local government at Bratislava.

Josef Tiso, the Slovakian leader, arrived in Berlin on March 13, 1939, and met with Hitler in a hurried conference. Hitler admitted to Tiso that until recently he had been unaware of the strength of the independence movement in Slovakia. Hitler promised Tiso that he would support Slovakia if she continued to demonstrate her will to independence. The Slovakian government proceeded to vote a declaration of independence from Czechoslovakia on March 14, 1939. (Source: Ibid., pp. 245-247).

Ruthenia also quickly declared independence and became part of Hungary, dissolving what was left of the Czech state. (Source: Buchanan, Patrick J., Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War, New York: Crown Publishers, 2008, p. 246).

Based on Nevile Henderson’s recommendation, Czech President Emil Hácha asked to see Hitler in the hope of finding a solution for a hopeless crisis. President Hácha was correctly received at Berlin with the full military honors due a visiting chief of state. Hácha signed an agreement with the Germans to have Germany form a Protectorate over the remaining Czech state. The period of direct German military rule lasted less than two months. The new regime formed by the Protectorate of Bohemia-Moravia on March 16, 1939, enjoyed considerable popularity among the Czechs. On July 31, 1939, Hitler agreed to permit the Czech government to have a military force of 7,000 soldiers, which included 280 officers. (Source: Hoggan, David L., The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed, Costa Mesa, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1989, pp. 250-251).

So, I do not think that Hitler or Germany caused the dissolution of the Czech state. Czechoslovakia would have been dissolved without any involvement or encouragement from Germany. In my opinion, it probably would have been better for Germany to stay completely out of the Czech crisis. This would have prevented the British warmongers from claiming that Hitler had violated the Munich Agreement and violated the Czechs’ right to self-determination.

You are correct, my apologies.

You have CONFIRMED the essence of my original posting above.

Seems to me that you have confirmed the essence of my post regarding this issue. Thanks.

Notes:

The Milner Group, less susceptible to public opinion, did not want the guarantee to Poland at all.

As a result, the guarantee was worded to cover Polish “independence” and not her “territorial integrity.”

British skullduggery at its fines. Cover yourself with weasel words by whi9ch you make promises you can keep or break at all as it suits you all the while making it seem you are living up to your words.

The Germans were too honest to see through the lies, deceit and bullshit to be able to respomnd appropriately and expose the British lies, frauds and deceits.

The Brits are still at it to this veery day in how they are trying to manipulate the EU into fighting the Russians in Ukraine.

More lies from the neo Nazi Frenchman. Ruzzia was forced into war? NONSENSE Putin has been unfairly Demonized? IDIOTIC. Hitler wanted more White kids? ONLY GERMAN ARYAN ones. He didn’t care about any other type of Whites, which is why the Germans killed thousands of them.

the greatest warmonger was Churchill, a “drunken bum” as Roosevelt routinely called him, who was literally bought and owned by Jewish interests.

Bush Sr., Bush Jr., Obama, Trump, Clinton, Biden, along with their subordinates – Powell, Hillary, Condi Rice, Blinken, Harris and lesser Jews like Yellen, fit this list perfectly, minus the alcohol. Importantly, the list has been growing exponentially. There’s no slowing it down, much less stop it. The sale of America by, to and for the Jews is now sealed.

So, Churchill was the self-appointed guardian of “The British Breed”?
During his second term as Prime Minister from 1951-’55, the UK’s annual intake of Afro-Caribbean immigrants increased from 3,000, to 10,000. The foundation was laid for the demographic suicide of Britain, which is well advanced today. By the 2060’s, it is projected that White Britons will become a minority in their own country.
It was said that WC professed dismay by the mid-1950’s about Non-White immigration. However, as in 1939, he acted in the interests of the same aliens who advanced his career since he had been rescued financially by “The Focus” in the mid-1930’s.
WC was a besotted, oppurtunistic individual who repeatedly betrayed his country, and his people.

Do you have any proof for your points 1) And 2) above? Or at least some believable literature? Because the way I recall reading is that Jews from Poland, but working & living in Germany, would be prohibited from returning to Poland unless they returned by a certain date. This was a law that was passed by Poland.

Since the Germans did not wish to get stuck with these people, German authorities moved these Polish nationals back to Poland before the critical date in the Polish law.

It is this latter action that apparently compelled the Jewish assassin in Paris to murder the German ambassador there, whereas his true disagreement was with the Polish government which gave cause to the movement of its nationals back to Poland.

It is my observation that many Jews change their names to whatever suits their purpose. Why would Gruenspan write his name as as Grynszpans if he was German and had lived in Germany? I doubt that any German authority would register a German’s name spelled Grynszpans.

Germany was invited into Czechia by its president Emil Hache, to protect it against Soviet incursions.

Czechoslovakia was an artificial construct after WWI,throwing together groups of people who did not like each other and did not want to be ruled by strange people.

You write: “The war did not really result in the total destruction of the German nation.”

My response: The war replaced the National Socialist regime with a Jewish-controlled Allied regime.

The Allies retained control of the German government. Few Americans are aware that no peace treaty concluding World War II was ever signed between Germany and the Allies. The German government from the end of World War II until today has always been a vassal government of the United States. Germany to this day has also always been militarily occupied by the United States. Tens of thousands of American soldiers are stationed in Germany not so much because of the strategic necessities of NATO, but because powerful interests want to make certain that Germany does not “go it alone.” American troops will stay in Germany for as long they are needed to maintain control of Germany. (Source: Schmidt, Hans, Hitler Boys in America: Re-Education Exposed, Pensacola, FL: Hans Schmidt Publications, 2003, pp. 6, 237).

Although Germany claims to be a democracy in which the will of the people counts, there is no realistic chance that a truly independent party could take power through the election process in Germany. The present German constitution imposed on Germany in 1949 by the victorious Allies ensures that a genuinely patriotic party having the true interests of the German people at heart will never come to power. Treaties later imposed upon Germany by the Allies also require that Germany accept even the most egregious occupation laws as still binding. The German government could not expel the American troops even if it wanted to. (Source: Ibid., pp. 6-7).

The brainwashing and reeducation of the Germans will probably not cease until the last U.S. soldier and CIA agent leave German soil. They are not stationed in Germany to safeguard the interests of the people of the United States or of Germany. Instead, they are there to suppress freedom of expression regarding important topics in Germany. The goal has been to destroy the great cultural nation of Germany through the falsification of history and the deliberate estrangement of German values in a controlled pseudo-democratic system. (Source: Ibid., pp. 277, 310).

The word “genocide” has been used repeatedly in the media and history books to describe the treatment of Jews by National Socialist Germany during World War II. However, as defined by Raphael Lemkin, Germany did not have a policy of genocide against the Jews. The Allies in Germany and many other countries now prosecute and imprison anyone who publicly states this fact. Gerard Menuhin writes that, between 1994 and 2004, there were 117,344 criminal proceedings for such thoughtcrime in Germany. (Source: Menuhin, Gerard, Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil, Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2015, p. 27).

You write: “No, it does not meet the definition of genocide. Merely killing civilians and cruel war policies are not genocide.”

My response: The word “genocide” was first used in 1944 by the Polish Jew Raphael Lemkin in his book Axis Rule in Occupied Europe.

Lemkin wrote regarding his invented word “genocide”:

“By ‘genocide’ we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group. This new word, coined by the author to denote an old practice in its modern development, is made from the ancient Greek word genos (race, tribe) and the Latin cide (killing), thus corresponding in its formation to such words as tyrannicide, homocide [sic], infanticide, etc.” (Source: Lemkin, Raphael, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation, Analysis of Government, Proposals for Redress, Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1944, p. 79).

Most people today use this narrow definition and define the word “genocide” as the deliberate destruction of a national, racial, religious, or ethnic group. However, Lemkin intended the word “genocide” to have a much broader meaning. Lemkin stated: “Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor.” (Source: Ibid.).

Raphael Lemkin’s invented word “genocide” appropriately applies to the Allied treatment of Germans. The Allies conspired to instigate a war that resulted in the complete destruction of the German nation. The Allies then murdered an estimated total of over 9 million Germans after the war while also destroying German culture. The Jewish-controlled Allied nations then forcibly replaced the German government and culture with their own government, culture, and version of historical events.

Upon Germany’s unconditional surrender in May 1945, the Allies initiated a highly successful campaign to brainwash Germans and to make them feel guilty about their actions during the war. The Allied perpetual campaign of negative publicity has prevented an objective analysis of Germany’s involvement in the war. The fact that the Allies forced Germany into World War II has been almost totally removed from public discussion.

Friedrich Grimm, a renowned German authority on international law, was shown samples of new leaflets printed soon after the war in German to be distributed by the Allies throughout Germany. Describing German war crimes, the leaflets were the first step in the reeducation program designed for Germany. Grimm suggested to an Allied officer that since the war was over, it was time to stop the libel. The Allied officer replied: “Why no, we’re just getting started. We’ll continue this atrocity campaign, we’ll increase it till no one will want to hear a good word about the Germans anymore, till whatever sympathy there is for you in other countries is completely destroyed, and until the Germans themselves become so mixed up they won’t know what they’re doing!” (Source: Tedor, Richard, Hitler’s Revolution, Chicago: 2013, p. 263).

Guilt pervades Germany as a result of this Allied propaganda campaign. German guilt is so powerful that it has caused the German government to make enormous reparations and offer humble apologies to the Allies, while ignoring the atrocities committed by the Allies against Germans after the war. Millions of German expellees have paid reparations to survivors of the German concentration camps even though these German expellees had their land and personal possessions stolen from them. German schoolchildren are repeatedly taught about crimes committed by National Socialist Germany, with little or nothing ever taught about their ancestors’ tragic sufferings after the war. (Source: Bacque, James, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, 2nd edition, Vancouver, British Columbia: Talonbooks, 2007, pp. 175-177).

It is against the law in present-day Germany to praise the Third Reich in any form or manner. The showing of a swastika is a criminal offense in Germany. German National Socialists who acted admirably during World War II cannot be praised, and many honorable Germans have had their graves desecrated. (Source: Schmidt, Hans, Hitler Boys in America: Re-Education Exposed, Pensacola, FL: Hans Schmidt Publications, 2003, p. 261).

Germar Rudolf, who spent 44 months in jail in Germany for publicly disputing the official Holocaust narrative, writes:

“Branded with a perpetual guilt complex, the once-proud German nation has turned into a featureless mass of pathetic, self-flagellating individuals. They accept that all which was done to them during and after the war—carpet bombing, mass murder of ‘disarmed enemy forces,’ mass deportations to Siberia, ethnic cleansing, starvation policies, dismantling of Germany’s industrial equipment, robbery of its patents—was a just punishment for all the crimes allegedly committed during the war, in particular during the so-called Holocaust.” (Source: Rudolf, Germar, Nazi Gas Chambers: The Roots of the Story, London: Academic Research Media Review Education Group LTD, 2025, p. 113).

You ask: “And next, why do you keep avoiding the question of the Armenian Holocaust? Do you also deny the Armenian Holocaust?”

My response: I have not studied this subject in detail, so I will not comment on it.

So the murder of tens of thousands of German expatriates in Poland was OK with you? Good to know.

FYI the German government appealed to Britain to help in stopping this massacre; Germany appealed to Britain for help because of the ludicrous guarantee Britain had extended to Poland, and Germany did not want to give Britain any excuse for starting hostilities.

But Britain was so intent of war with Germany (at the behest of the USA Roosevelt) that it declined to assist Germany in stopping this massacre.

Britain and USA wanted war with Germany at any cost, primarily due to Jewish banking interests in London and Wall Street. Britain had the additional hope of stopping German export goods from eating Britain’s lunch.

Poor baby! No one likes you, so sad.

You throw around the word ‘moral’ and ‘morality’ with abandon. In an earlier post above I asked you politely to define your meaning of those words.

Methinks that your definition and the dictionary’s definition thereof do not coincide. Why do I think so? Because any twit who writes that the USSR is/was more moral than any other country of your choice, has very serious mental problems.

Do you ever read and try to understand your scribbles you publish here? Or are you just another would-be copy and paste artist?

Note to Iran: the Israel attack wouldn’t have happened if you had the nukes.

Iran needs to develop a nuke if it wants to survive. Look at North Korea, no one dares attack it anymore. Sure there will be international outrage but tough, you gave us no choice Iran can say

You write: “The above is not about an extermination policy with the aim of exterminating an entire nation.”

My response: The Allies mass murdered approximately 9 million Germans after World War II. As defined by Polish Jew Raphael Lemkin, who invented the word “genocide,” the Allies conducted a program of genocide against the German people.

You write: “You simply cannot understand this. The Jewish Holocaust is a clearly proven fact (confessions of the Nazis themselves before, during and after the war, thousands of eyewitnesses, documents, etc.).”

My response: The official Jewish Holocaust narrative is a fraud. You can read Chapter Eight of my book Germany’s War on this website for more detailed information.

You write: “I’m still waiting for those quotes from Roosevelt and Churchill where they call for the extermination of Germans. So far, the only real calls for the extermination of other nations have come from Germans.”

My response: My comment #632 on this discussion thread documents that the official Holocaust narrative is fictional. The Germans did not have a mass extermination program of the Jews during World War II.

My comments #632, 641, and 660 on this discussion thread document that the quotes you cite do not prove a German policy of mass extermination of the Jews.

As briefly discussed in comment #643 on this discussion thread, it was the Allies who had a policy of mass murdering Germans during and after World War II. The following are some Allied policies that resulted in the mass murder of Germans:

1) A peaceful settlement of the war was impossible after the announcement of the Allied policy of unconditional surrender at a press conference in Casablanca on January 24, 1943. The Allied policy of unconditional surrender ensured that the war would be fought to its bitter end. Maurice Hankey, an experienced British statesman, summed up the effect of the unconditional surrender policy as follows:

“It embittered the war, rendered inevitable a fight to the finish, banged the door to the possibility of either side offering terms or opening up negotiations, gave the Germans and the Japanese the courage of despair, strengthened Hitler’s position as Germany’s ‘only hope,’ aided Goebbels’s propaganda, and made inevitable the Normandy landing and the subsequent terribly exhausting and destructive advance through North France, Belgium, Luxemburg, Holland and Germany. The lengthening of the war enabled Stalin to occupy the whole of Eastern Europe, to ring down the iron curtain and so to realize at one swoop a large installment of his avowed aims against so-called capitalism, in which he includes social democracy…Not only the enemy countries, but nearly all countries were bled white by this policy, which has left us all, except the United States of America, impoverished and in dire straits. Unfortunately, also, these policies, so contrary to the spirit of the Sermon on the Mount, did nothing to strengthen the moral position of the Allies.” (Source: Hankey, Maurice Pascal Alers, Politics, Trials and Errors, Chicago: Regnery, 1950, pp. 125-126).

Numerous other historians and political leaders have stated that Great Britain and the United States made it impossible for Germany to reach a peaceful resolution to the war. It is widely acknowledged that Hitler did not want a war with either Great Britain or the United States. Instead, Great Britain and the United States wanted war with Germany. In this regard, Rep. Hamilton Fish stated:

“If Roosevelt and Churchill had really wished to deliver the world from the menace of totalitarianism, they had their God-given opportunity on June 22, 1941. England could have withdrawn from the war and made peace with Hitler on the most favorable terms. Hitler had no designs whatever on the United States, so we would not have been endangered by this turn of events. Then Hitler and Stalin would have fought each other into exhaustion. This is exactly what the Baldwin-Chamberlain foreign policy had originally envisaged. Mr. Truman, then a senator, strongly supported this policy, as did Senator Vandenberg and many others. It would have left the United States and England dominant powers in the world, and they might have kept it a predominately free world.” (Source: Fish, Hamilton, FDR The Other Side of the Coin: How We Were Tricked into World War II, New York: Vantage Press, 1976, p. 115).

2) Churchill never once attempted to make peace with Germany. In a January 1, 1944, letter to Stalin, Churchill said: “We never thought of peace, not even in that year when we were completely isolated and could have made peace without serious detriment to the British Empire, and extensively at your cost. Why should we think of it now, when victory approaches for the three of us?” (Source: Walendy, Udo, The Methods of Reeducation, Vlotho/Weser, Germany: Verlag für Volkstum und Zeitgeschichtsforschung, 1979, p. 3).

3) Even leaders of the German resistance movement discovered that the Allied policy of unconditional surrender would not change with Hitler dead. On July 18, 1944, Otto John returned from fruitless negotiations with Allied representatives in Madrid and informed his fellow plotters that unconditional surrender would be in place even if they succeeded in killing Hitler.

Dr. Eugen Gerstenmaier, a former conspirator and president of the West German Parliament after the war, stated in a 1975 interview: “What we in the German resistance during the war did not want to see, we learned in full measure afterward; that this war was ultimately not waged against Hitler, but against Germany.” (Source: Tedor, Richard, Hitler’s Revolution, Chicago: 2013, p. 257).

4) Great Britain began to violate the essential rule of civilized warfare that hostilities must be limited to the combatant forces. On May 11, 1940, British bombers began to attack the industrial areas of Germany. The British government adopted a new definition of military objectives so that this term included any building which in any way contributed, directly or indirectly, to the war effort of the enemy. On December 16, 1940, a moonlight raid by 134 British planes took place on Mannheim designed “to concentrate the maximum amount of damage in the center of the town.” Great Britain abandoned all pretense of attacking military, industrial, or any other particular target with this raid. (Source: Veale, Frederick J. P., Advance to Barbarism, Newport Beach, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1993, pp. 182-183).

On March 28, 1942, the British air offensive against Germany initiated Jewish physicist Frederick Lindemann’s bombing plan. (Source: https://www.oxfordchabad.org/templates/articlecco_cdo/aid/457389/jewish/Oxford-Jewish-Personalities.htm).

The Lindemann Plan, which continued with undiminished ferocity until the end of the war, concentrated on bombing German working-class houses. The British bombing during this period was simple terror bombing designed to shatter the morale of the German civilian population and thereby generate an inclination to surrender. The bombing focused on working-class houses built close together because Professor Lindemann maintained that a higher percentage of bloodshed per ton of explosives dropped could be expected as opposed to bombing higher class houses surrounded by large yards and gardens. (Source: Veale, Frederick J. P., Advance to Barbarism, Newport Beach, CA: Institute for Historical Review, pp. 184-185).

The climax of the British bombing offensive under the Lindemann Plan was reached on the night of February 13, 1945, when a massive bombing raid was directed against Dresden. The population of Dresden was swollen by a horde of terrified German women and children running from the advancing Soviet army. No one will ever know exactly how many people died in the bombing of Dresden but estimates of 250,000 civilian deaths appear to be reasonable. The bombing of Dresden served little military purpose; it was designed primarily to terrify the German civilian population and break their will to continue the war. (Source: Ibid., pp. 185-186, 192-193).

A horrifying aspect of the Dresden terror bombings occurred during the daylight hours of Feb. 14, 1945. On this day low-flying American fighters machine-gunned helpless Germans as they rushed toward the Elbe River in a desperate attempt to escape the inferno. Since Dresden had no air defense, the German civilians were easy targets. (Source: Bird, Vivian, “An Examination of British War Crimes During World War II,” The Barnes Review, Vol. VI, No. 6, Nov. /Dec. 2000, p. 59. See also McKee, Alexander, Dresden 1945: The Devil’s Tinderbox, New York: E.P. Dutton, Inc., 1984, pp. 219-224).

5) The Western Allies deliberately murdered approximately 1 million disarmed German POWs by means of starvation, exposure, and illness. This Allied atrocity was first publicly exposed in 1989 in the book Other Losses by James Bacque.

6) One of the great tragedies of the 20th century was the forced expulsion of ethnic Germans from their homes after the end of World War II. The Allies carried out the largest forced population transfer—and perhaps the greatest single movement of people—in human history. A minimum of 12 million and possibly as many as 18.1 million Germans were driven from their homes because of their ethnic background. Probably 2.1 million or more of these German expellees, mostly women and children, died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” expulsion. (Source: Dietrich, John, The Morgenthau Plan: Soviet Influence on American Postwar Policy, New York: Algora Publishing, 2002, p. 137).

The fate of the German expellees has been ignored in most universities and high schools. The extreme hardships and suffering the expellees experienced have been pushed aside, if not totally forgotten. People have thus been deprived of an important history lesson: mass expulsions are almost invariably unjust and inhumane. American historian R. M. Douglas writes:

“The most important lesson of the expulsion of the Germans, then, is that if these operations cannot be carried out under circumstances in which brutality, injustice, and needless suffering are inevitable, they cannot be carried out at all. A firm appreciation of this truth, and a determination to be guided by it at all times and in every situation, however enticing the alternative may momentarily seem, is the most appropriate memorial that can be erected to this tragic, unnecessary, and, we must resolve, never to be repeated episode in Europe’s and the world’s recent history.” (Source: Douglas, R. M., Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans after the Second World War, New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2012, p. 374).

7) National Socialist propaganda had repeatedly warned of the dire consequences of unconditional surrender to the Allies. In Germany as a whole it is estimated that approximately 2 million German women were raped in the aftermath of the Second World War. This represents more rapes against a defeated enemy than any other war in history. (Source: Lowe, Keith, Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2012, pp. 51, 55).

8) Capt. Albert R. Behnke, a U.S. Navy medical doctor, stated in regard to Germany: “From 1945 to the middle of 1948 one saw the probable collapse, disintegration and destruction of a whole nation…Germany was subject to physical and psychic trauma unparalleled in history.” Behnke concluded that the Germans under the Allies had fared much worse than the Dutch under the Germans, and for far longer. (Source: Behnke, Capt. Albert R., USN, MC, “Physiological and Psychological Factors in Individual and Group Survival,” June 1958 (Behnke Papers, Box 1, HIA). Quoted in Bacque, James, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, 2nd edition, Vancouver, British Columbia: Talonbooks, 2007, p. 89).

Even world-famous German opponents of Hitler such as Martin Niemöller and his family suffered extreme hardships after the war. Niemöller told his friend Pastor Ewart Turner that if things didn’t improve, “I should prefer to be back in my cell number 31 at Dachau.” Niemöller blamed “the followers of the Morgenthau Plan” who had moved their “headquarters from Washington to the American zone.” (Source: Hockenos, Matthew D., Then They Came for Me: Martin Niemöller, the Pastor Who Defied the Nazis, New York: Basic Books, pp. 204, 212).

9) An estimated 5.7 million Germans already residing in Germany died from the starvation policies implemented by the Allies. James Bacque detailed how this 5.7 million death total is calculated:

“The population of all occupied Germany in October 1946 was 65,000,000, according to the census prepared under the ACC. The returning prisoners who were added to the population in the period October 1946-September 1950 numbered 2,600,000 (rounded), according to records in the archives of the four principal Allies. Births according to the official German statistical agency, Statistisches Bundesamt, added another 4,176,430 newcomers to Germany. The expellees arriving totaled 6,000,000. Thus, the total population in 1950 before losses would have been 77,776,430, according to the Allies themselves. Deaths officially recorded in the period 1946-50 were 3,235,539, according to the UN Yearbook and the German government. Emigration was about 600,000, according to the German government. Thus, the population found should have been 73,940,891. But the census of 1950 done by the German government under Allied supervision found only 68,230,796. There was a shortage of 5,710,095 people, according to the official Allied figures (rounded to 5,700,000).” (Source: Bacque, James, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, 2nd edition, Vancouver, British Columbia: Talonbooks, 2007, pp. 115-116).

Bacque’s calculations have been confirmed by Dr. Anthony B. Miller, who is a world-famous epidemiologist and head of the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics at the University of Toronto. Miller read the whole work, including the documents, and checked the statistics, which he says “confirm the validity of [Bacque’s] calculations.” Miller states: “These deaths appear to have resulted, directly or indirectly, from the semi-starvation food rations that were all that were available to the majority of the German population during this time period.” (Source: Ibid., pp. xvii-xviii).

There is more that I could write on this subject. This is enough for now.

Here are some reminders:
End of 1938: The polish passport crisis, which lead to the Murder of a german Diplomat in Paris which in turn supposedly turned to the “Reichskristallnacht”.
There was supposedly artillery fire from poland into the german city Beuthen. It was shown together with the burrial of a murdered man in Danzig in the “Deutsche Wochenschau”.

Come back when your IQ grows above 80. We Poles as a rule are honorable people and we don’t torture “microcephals” with information that they cannot comprehend. Man, I’m worried this is already too much for you.

“Germany was not primarily responsible for starting World War II”

What utter nonsense. I have to say that one can rarely read something so silly and disconnected from reality.

Of course Germany is primarily responsible for starting WW2 – they tried and tried and tried until they succeeded.

Were they the only force responsible? Certainly no.

Were there forces on the Allied side that were pushing for another war? Absolutely yes.

Were Germans responsible for starting WW2? Hell yes.

It’s that simple and that complicated at the same time.

You have heard of the expression: “Actions speak louder than words?”

Britain and USA are the greatest war mongers of modern times and did their damnedest to destroy Germany. Now they are egging on Israel to destroy Iran.

Furthermore, C & R had their spokespeople, you have heard of “Germany Must Perish” and other genocidal pearls of wisdom such as “There are 20 million too many Germans!”

Your bosom pal Stalin was as thick as thieves with these creeps, after all he started the genocidal action by murdering 20 or 30 million of his own nationals.

Old German proverb: “Jeder kehre vor seiner Tuer”. Ie clean up your act before you accuse others.

Poles are the receiver of stolen goods, ie. the German territories. Such people never return stolen goods voluntarily, say on moral grounds.

Should the European Union disintegrate, and there are many Europeans that hope for this, we will see how well Poland survives without the billions of EU subsidies supplied mostly by Germany.

I just read on DRUDGE that Israel bombed Tehran in Iran. The lunatics are truly running the asylum.

And that’s why Germany committed the genocide of the Slavs?!

So “evil” England is to blame for everything?! 😀

Well, if not Russia, then England.

By the way, all options were not exhausted. Germany did not want peace at all. On the contrary, peace was fully supported by Russia, France, England and Serbia. None of them wanted a world war. Only Germany wanted one. And it did. The claim about a “preventive attack” is a classic lie and a cover for an aggressor who deliberately prepared aggression against others.

Nice how you defend the genocide of Serbs and Slavs and war crimes against the French, Belgians, Italians and other German war crimes (i.e. crimes of Germany and its allies).

Your defense of the rape of Belgian, French, Italian and Serbian women, together with the defense of the terrible genocidal massacres of the Serbian population and the massacres of the Belgian population and the French population (not to mention other war crimes), is particularly disgusting. Not to mention the criminal collaboration with Turkey and the German participation in the Armenian Holocaust.

Among other things, you are committing a crime here. And that is the denial of genocide. If it is a crime to deny the Armenian Holocaust and German responsibility for WW2, it is equally criminal to deny the German genocide of Slavs (Serbs, Ruthenians, etc.) during WW1 and the main German responsibility for WW1 (i.e. the main responsibility of the Central Powers).
German crimes, including crimes against peace, have been clearly proven. Denial of German war crimes of genocide and primary responsibility for the war is as credible as denial of the Armenian Holocaust and Germany’s responsibility for WW2. That is, on the level of the flat Earth claim.

There wasn’t any Germans in Europe. The Romans used word Germans meaning friends. There was Lechia a confederation of Slavic tribes stretching from the Rhine River till the Ural Mountains. Germany is the lunatic creation of City of London to kick it East to kill and rob Slavs. There was a little tribe called Alemani that’s all. Lechia-Lehistan in Iranian Sanskrit means country of kings lords wisemen was a ancient Poland. Gdañsk Mr. Unz has been the first capitol of Lechia called Kodan established by the second king of Lechia named Kodan (1770B.C.). The history has been rigged by the satanic City of London and the satanic Vatican.

FYI those camps were WORK camps.
The terrible conditions therein were due to the British and USA endless bombings that destroyed the supply lines and factories for food and medical supplies.

Then how come there is no verifiable forensic evidence to support all those allegations of holocostianity?

6 million bodies would leave between 100 million and 200 million teeth, the shell of which are not destroyed by cremation.

The claims of open air cremation would leave even more physical evidence. Shooting by the Einsatzgruppen would leave at least 1 bullet for each body.

All this has been debated ad infinitum in other threads of this forum; please avail yourself of these.

As to translations of the German texts of various speeches, you communist lovers always put your spin on these to suit your purposes, and is therefor worthless.

#595 HdC

“We get it already: Germany baaad, communists goood. LOL”

No, no, no. Don’t you remember?

Communists bad, Germans worse.

Communist’s regimes in Central, Eastern, Souther Europe after war
weren’t so devastating for Slavs as was German occupation during WWII.
Germans have long term policy extermination of Slavs.

Do you think, that after defeating Stalin,
Hitler would have withdrawn from Russia, Poland and Czechoslovakia?

No way!

Hitler’s aim was to destroy Slavs and make Lebensraum for allegedly superior German race.

He partially made his plans real.
That’s why Germany today owes Poland over 1,5 billion (1,500 miliards) US dollars of war reparations.

See:
“The report on the losses sustained by Poland as a result of
German aggression and occupaiton during the Second World War, 1939-45”

https://instytutstratwojennych.pl/strona/245-volume-1 ; page 18.

You write: “You are writing false information again. Freedom of speech does not mean saying everything you like.”

My response: Actually, freedom of speech does mean saying anything you like.

Despite the extensive attention given to the event, revisionist historians have called into question many aspects of the Holocaust story. In particular, it has been shown that: 1) there were no homicidal gas chambers in any of the German concentration camps; 2) Germany did not have a program of mass murder against the Jews; and 3) the standard estimate of 6 million Jews who died during World War II is a ridiculous exaggeration.

A very weak and superficial defense. Totally ahistorical, simplistic, and the nadir of blinkered vignettes. Try harder next time, unless you get overheated and bust a gasket.

Your statements are not even generalisms, but captain or majorisms.

At the very least check your ramblings for logic and consistency.

To wit: “…shot all the men and sent all the women to extermination camps…” Why bother with the latter? Did the executioners run out of bullets.

So now the German humanitarian efforts to save and protect children is now labelled as “racist”. For you it would have been preferable to leave said children to the ravages of war and communism.

Stalin was intent on bringing the joys of communism to the entire world.
His speeches showed his intents.

Rubbish!

For WWI & II Russia and the USSR were a member of the group of the instigators.

Leading up to WWI Russia mobilized its military at the behest of France before Germany made any such motion. Mobilization at that time was akin to a declaration of war. The German Kaiser prevailed upon his cousin the Russian Tsar to stop and reverse this mobilization (declaration of war) but to no avail.
France also mobilized before Germany did.

Regarding WWII, there is sufficient evidence to show that the USSR was about to invade Germany and western Europe. Germany struck preemptively to stop this. I’ve read Suvorov and opposing opinions none of which could furnish proof for their opinions.

Please define “moral superiority”. I’ve read several definitions thereof but none of them seem to catch the idea you are trying to convey with your statement “…German’s, if anything, are the distinct moral inferiors of Russians…”

Regarding the USA/Mexican wall financing. It is very easy to get Mexico to pay for that wall.

Simply instigate a 10% withholding tax on any US cash funds transferred to Mexico. Presto, sufficient cash to pay for that wall in a coup;e of years.

Zyklon B was used to kill lice, not humans.

This is too easy, psychopath:

CROATIA: MYTH AND REALITY
C. Michael McAdams
MYTH: “THE BASKET OF HUMAN EYEBALLS”

Myth: The Croatian wartime Chief-of-State Ante Pavelic routinely maintained a basket containing twenty kilos of human eyeballs at his desk side.

Reality: This statement is literally a work of fiction taken from the novel Kaputt by Curzio Malaparte (Kurt Suckert, also known as Gianni Strozzi). The book was written as fiction, sold as fiction, and is cataloged in every library in the world as fiction. To cite Kaputt as a source about World War II is analogous to citing Gone With the Wind as an authoritative history of the American Civil War.

That this tired tale is still being retold is the second most amazing part of this myth. More amazing is that anybody, no matter how blinding their hatred of Croatians, could believe it. And yet this myth was quoted as fact as recently as 1995 in official publications printed in Belgrade by the Ministry of Information of the Republic of Serbia and repeated by naive journalists around the world. The myth survived and was given renewed life by the Serbian government, journalists and politicians because it came with quotation marks. The legend had a footnote, a citation, an author and all the trappings of fact. The author was often cited as “the most famous Italian writer,” “the Italian journalist” and even the “famed Italian historian”, Curzio Malaparte. His famous quote from the 1946 English translation of the novel Kaputt reads:

While he spoke, I gazed at a wicker basket on the Poglavnik’s desk. The lid was raised and the basket seemed to be filled with mussels, or shelled oysters –as they are occasionally displayed in the windows ”of Fortnum and Mason in Piccadilly in London.

Castertano looked at me and winked, “Would you like a nice oyster stew?”

“Are they Dalmatian oysters?” I asked the Poglavnik.

Ante Pavelic removed the lid from the basket and revealed the mussels, that slimy and jelly-like mass, and he said smiling, with that tired good-natured smile of his, “It is a present from my loyal usatshis. Forty pounds of human eyes.”

Kaputt and its author both had fascinating stories to tell. In the original press release for the book, Malaparte ed that the manuscript was started in the Ukraine in 1941 and smuggled throughout Europe in coat linings and in the soles of his shoes. Finally, the manuscript was divided into three parts and given to three diplomats, to be reunited in 1943 on Capri where it was finished. The book chronicled Malaparte’s movements around Europe in 1941 and 1942, when he claimed to have visited every front and knew every head of state, usually on a; first name basis. Malaparte apparently spoke every language and shared the charms of every beautiful princess.

According to his own preface to Kaputt, his personal friendships with Mussolini, Hitler and others did not save him from being thrown into jail in July 1943 as antiGerman. Miraculously, he was soon freed and was working for the Allies by September of that year. It was while working as a propagandist for the Allies that Malaparte conipleted Kaputt, which he described as “…horribly gay and gruesome.”

The critics agreed. Malaparte’s two major books, Kaputt and Skin were 5 labeled “Best selling Nausea” by Time magazine. His writings contained pages of sordid tales about the evil world of Fascist Europe. Malaparte’s basket of human eyeballs must be taken in context, as Time magazine wrote in 1952:

“He shows mothers who sell their children into prostitution; but then, says Malaparte with a smirk, there are also the children who would gladly sell their mothers. He dwells for part of a chapter on a street peopled with twisted female dwarfs, who fed, he asserts gleefully, on the unnatural lust in the American ranks. Another chapter is concerned with a visit to a shop that sells blonde pubic wigs. U.S. soldiers, Malaparte explains, like blondes.”

These offensive themes only scratch the surface of Malaparte’s sick writings. That the Allies won the War through the devices of a “homosexual maquis”, flags of human skin, and an Allied general who served his guests a boiled child are all included in Malaparte’s fare.

I see WHY the National Socialist had WORK CAMPS. You had Jews robbing Germans while Germans were wearing rags, lucky to have enough to eat, and the Jew was doing what he continues to do in America, produce nothing but fill his pockets from ill gotten gains. I do believe that some individuals did actually hate Jews so much that they took liberties with the POW, but tell me that didn’t happen to the millions of German women raped by “the good guys” or German POW in Eisenhower’s Death Camps. It is amazing that tens of millions of Whites died slaughtering each other for a people that despise them. Dumbass Whites mourn the LIE about 6 million but could care less about tens of millions of Whites dying. Pathetic.

We get it already: Germany baaad, communists goood. LOL

You write: “What? You mean doubt that Irving demanded that the book be withdrawn? That is how the whole case started.”

My response: David Irving filed his law suit in an attempt to end the organized campaign by international Jewry to censor his work. Irving stated in the opening address at his trial:

“I have since 1996 seen one fearful publisher after another falling away from me, declining to reprint my works, refusing to accept new commissions and turning their back on me when I approach.” Irving claimed this had been done as “part of an organized international endeavor.” (Source: Lipstadt, Deborah E., History on Trial: My Day in Court with David Irving, New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc., 2005, p. 80).

The harassment and censorship campaign against David Irving by international Jewry also included numerous arrests in various countries. These arrests do not seem to bother British historian Sir Richard J. Evans. Evans writes: “One would not have expected a reputable historian to have run into such trouble, and indeed it was impossible to think of any historian of any standing at all who had been subjected to so many adverse legal judgments…” (Source: Evans, Richard J., Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial, New York: Basic Books, 2001, p. 14).

Richard Evans does not seem to be concerned that David Irving’s arrests were attributable to the fact that numerous countries make it a felony to dispute the so-called Holocaust. This reflects poorly on the countries Irving was arrested in rather than on Irving’s abilities as a historian. The question is: “What kind of historical truth needs criminal sanctions to protect it?” The Holocaust story would not need criminal sanctions to protect it if it was solidly based on historiographic evidence.

Richard Evans also attempts to minimize the financial backing Lipstadt received from mostly wealthy Jewish donors when he wrote his book Lying About Hitler. Evans writes:

“Throughout the trial and long afterwards, Irving continually claimed on his website that the defense was being bankrolled by Jews, both wealthy individuals and organized groups, across the world. In fact, of course, there was no secret about the fact that the bulk of the funds came from Penguin Books Ltd., and Penguin’s insurers. ‘Despite Irving’s assertion to the contrary,’ noted Mark Bateman, Penguin’s solicitor, ‘it was Penguin that paid the fees of the experts, leading counsel, junior counsel and my firm.’ They had also paid the fees of all the researchers. Mishcon de Reya, Anthony Julius’s firm of solicitors, had indeed worked for the first two years of the case, in 1996 and 1997, pro bono, for no fee at all. They had only started to charge fees when the final preparations for and conduct of the case began to consume major resources within the firm (at one time, nearly 40 people were working on the case, many of them full-time). It was solely for these costs that Deborah Lipstadt was obliged to pay, and for which she received financial backing from supporters such as Steven Spielberg, amounting in total to no more than a fraction of the overall costs.” (Source: Evans, Richard J., Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial, New York: Basic Books, 2001, p. 230).

Neither Deborah Lipstadt nor Richard Evans details the total costs incurred to defend her against David Irving’s libel suit. Lipstadt writes that a large envelope presented to her from Anthony Julius before the trial showed a bill of $1.6 million payable to Anthony Julius’s law firm. (Source: Lipstadt, Deborah E., History on Trial: My Day in Court with David Irving, New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc., 2005, p. 37). This amount is “more than a fraction of the overall costs” of her trial as represented by Richard Evans. David Irving is clearly correct that a substantial portion of Lipstadt’s defense was bankrolled by wealthy Jews across the world.

David Irving’s biggest mistake in his case was choosing to be his own lawyer. Germar Rudolf writes: “Those who choose to be their own lawyer choose a fool.” (Source: Van Pelt, Robert Jan, The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2002, p. 496).

Irving was at a major disadvantage in his case because he was up against a huge and experienced legal team with only himself as his attorney. Even though Irving testified that he was not an Holocaust historian, much of the testimony in his trial involved the Holocaust story. (Source: Ibid., p. 137).

Bullshit.
Britain had planned on a war with Germany before 1900 already because of international trading losses by Britain. These losses became larger and larger up to the beginning of WWI.

France wanted revenge on Germany for losing the Franco-Prussian war; never mind that previously France had invaded German territory 40 times over a period of 400 years with attendant murder, mayhem, and pillage.

Fact remains that Britain, followed by France, were and remain Europe’s greatest war mongers.

A peaceful settlement between Iran and the West will not come through negotiations. For that to happen, Iran must accept Western hegemony and, above all, recognize Israel.

This is NOT true. This is a propaganda spread by the Iran’s fifth column, ‘the reformists’ like Sari algham, a zionist servant, close to traitor Rouhani, to mislead the public.
Qaddafi was disarmed and gave BRIBE to US and Britain including that genocidal Tony Blair Billions of dollars had NO problem to recognize Israel, like other traitor Arab head of states, but Libya was attacked by US and NATO after Libya was DISARMED, killing Qaddafi, and partitioning the country like Syria and Iraq. These criminals and genocidal British and Americans along with their MAD DOG Israel have the same plan for Iran using pretext ‘nuclear weapon’. This plan has been designed in the late 19th century in Britain with cooperation of the United States, where still is in progress, using their foothold in the occupied Palestine’, Israel, to erect ‘greater Israel’ to dominate the region for the INTEREST of the criminal West. But, Iran knows the plan and has prepared herself for a long time.

The problem is not Iran, it is Russia and China who still are using Iran as a chip to obtain concessions from the West. I know we cannot trust Russia, but I didn’t know China could be the same since I heard the story of china from Profeor Akbar Salehi, former head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, where China stabbed Iran in the back for $60 Million dollars concessions she received from the US. Shame on China.
Iran must do whatever she can to push these genocidal criminals back. If they dared to attack, Iran MUST strike back to KILL in large numbers. Iran must kill the aggressors, American, British and their dogs, the Israelis, to send a strong message that
IRAN HAS A RIGHT TO DEFEND HERSELF. Iran has the means and must do it. Don’t be gentle.

I do think that the Deep States of both UK and USA are led by people ready to risk ‘tactical nuclear’ exchange. Most of them hold that view because they think they can limit it to either Russia or China as target without the other getting involved. So the fifth among Anglo-Zionist Deep Staters is which country to target.

WASP empire is and always has been insatiable, and it also is the most self-righteous in history. That means it long ago fell into the mind trap of seeing even its most brutal actions as Justice, as Righteousness, as Charity for the Globe, etc. It is WASP Tikkun Olam: WASP imperialism repairs the world.

And as WASP culture is born of Judaizing heresy, none of that should be any surprise.

Indeed, the world must act always aware that those who carol WASP empire from behind Deep State curtains would be happy to see a couple billion dead people who refused to bow to Anglo-Zionism.

Hmmm, I seem to recall that the German tribes took on the Roman empire and defeated the Roman armed forces. ‘Twas 6 or 9 AD or so.

While Germany did have some pirates it was definitely not a piratical country.

Iran it is also a huge country with 80 million+ population. Whereas Israel is a flyspec by comparison.

Recall WWII and the time and effort it took to defeat Germany.

People who advocate nuclear war are seriously mentally impaired and should not be in or advise governments.

Most of the world would trust Iran with nukes over the Terrorist Theocracy of Israel with the nukes it stole from the US.

Talmudian war criminals are our only true enemy.

I meant to post this here.

The following points refute key elements of the holocaust with logic and science. Truth can’t be refuted.

There has been no objective forensic analysis at any supposed site. There is no physical evidence. Any activity that demonstrates and shares evidence to refute the holocaust is a crime in every nation where it allegedly occurred.

The fact that all evidence that refutes the holocaust is criminal in every nation where it allegedly occurred is especially relevant if you are accepting any evidence at all from those nations.

Refusing to consider evidence is the definition of bias, bigotry and a disregard for justice.

Without objective forensic evidence all we have is a story made up of piecemeal recollections of events from paid and coerced fuckwitnesses.

I refute those stories with correctly applied logic and science.

From engineering, logistical, scientific and physical principles, the claims made by holocaust™ promoters can be easily debunked. A lot more people than just jews perished during WW2. It seems that according to holocaust™ promoters, jewish deaths are the only ones that count.
From the International Committee of the Red Cross records released from the archives at Bad Arelson, the total number of deaths in the labor camps was approximately 271,000, NOT 6,000,000. Add to that, more Roman Catholics than jews perished in the camps. Germans were meticulous record-keepers and documented all deaths in precision detail.
Most people are unaware (due to jewish propaganda) that many jews lived unremarkable lives in Germany and the occupied countries throughout the entirety of the war, yet all claim to be holocaust™ survivors. Many children were born in the camps, were well taken care of and lived on after the war.
According to jewish logic, any jew who lived during WW2 is considered to be a holocaust™ survivor, even those who lived in the USA outside the European war zone. To add insult to injury, jewish psychologists have declared that holocaust™ transference syndrome is real and infects the children and grandchildren of holocaust™ survivors, making them eligible for holocaust reparations. Using this logic, the holocaust™ grift will never end.
Let’s look at Anne Frank, the jewish holocaust™ “poster child” for German atrocities. The Frank family and their associates were not innocent jews but ran a smuggling, black market, document forgery operation when they went into hiding when they were picked up for their criminal activities.
Typhus was rampant in the camps due to Allied bombings of the infrastructure and rail lines adjacent to the camps. Yes, unfortunately Anne Frank perished from typhus while her father was treated in a camp hospital, survived the war and edited Anne Frank’s “diary”, spicing it up with sexual innuendos and other fabrications, assigned rights to a publisher who he screwed out of shekels. As to Otto Frank surviving typhus and being treated, what is a hospital doing in a purported “death camp”? Not only is the Anne Frank story full of holes, there are many other fabrications that have been used to lend credence to the ”poor jews” who died in the holocaust™.
Holocaust™ historian Elie Wiesel claims to have been in many camps, yet no proof is offered. Wiesel claims that “some things are true that never happened”. What kind of statement of truth is that?
Let’s look at “gas chambers”…the buildings that are claimed to have been used as “gas chambers” have doors that swing the wrong way, no means for inserting and removing the “gas”, and using a “insecticide” as a toxic gas are impossible on their faces. Zyklon B was used for delousing clothing and other items (not humans), requires a temperature of 150 degrees to be effective and could not have been used as an execution agent.
Not only that, holocaust™ promoters claim that bodies were retrieved from the “death chambers” immediately after “gassing” without decontamination procedures being carried out. Attempts to retrieve bodies as such without decontamination (which takes hours) would have killed the “gas chamber” operators.
Logistics is another “nail in the coffin” of the so-called holocaust™ fable. Germany was an energy-poor country that could not afford to use its limited energy to transport jews (and others) to camps just to kill them. Germany did not have the means to do so.
Ground penetrating radar has been used to pinpoint supposed burial sites (none which have been found. Supposedly, there is a jewish proscription against disturbing burial grounds. This is used to hide the fact that they do not exist.
The holocaust™ is indeed the “grift of the twentieth century” a massive Hollywood-style production that is finally losing its luster. Why do you think countries pass laws which outlaw any deviation from the “official” holocaust™ story?
In many countries, the so-called holocaust™ has been turned into a “religion” from which deviation from the “official” holocaust™ story is punishable by fines and incarceration.
In Germany and elsewhere, 90-plus year-old grandmothers and others have been incarcerated in maximum security prisons for merely questioning “that which may not be questioned”, the so-called jewish holocaust™. Look up Monika Schaefer, Ernst Zundel, Ursula Haverbeck, all three elderly who have been imprisoned for merely questioning the so-called holocaust™. The new “state religion” in many countries who have criminalized honest investigation is holocaustianity™.
Holocaust™ museums (actually jewish Hollywood-style productions, freak shows) have no place in the western world in their present form as they amplify lies, fabrications, and have imposed a Stockholm Syndrome on Germany and the rest of the world which persists to this very day.
It is long overdue for the holocaust™ fable to be thoroughly and dispassionately investigated, letting the chips fall where they may. Anything less promotes this massive fraud, truly the “hoax of the twentieth century”.
More to come.

A ray of hope.

No; I always thought he was a saint based on his achievements in Germany.

I was born after the war and got my information from my parents and numerous relatives.

Math is racist and probably antisemitic too.

Thank you, Kevin, for another very insightful and entertaining article. (And yes, it does appear likely that the WWII gas chamber allegations are entirely concocted, just like claims of lamps shades made of Jewish skin.) These propagandistic assertions are absurd and unsubstantiated. This is why ‘questioning the Holocaust’ is forbidden. Holocaust myths do not survive close scrutiny.

More Chris hedges nonsense. The German people were not idiots deluded by a demagogue, they were abused people who chose the only leader willing to speak out about that abuse and its direct sources.
But, anyone willing to quote and take seriously the Communist filth Hannah Arendt waggling her forked tongue at people she utterly despised and consider it “truth” really should just be ignored anyway.

Was the Soviet plan to invade Germany and western Europe also an Anglo-American Plot? If so could you cite some supporting evidence? Thanks.

Without the foregoing your premise that “Hitler took the bait” is downright ridiculous.

Aside: Did Hitler take any bait when he declared war on the USA, a declaration that followed many months of US war like actions against Germany and its navy???

I submit that Hitler & Germany acted in response to real enemy action and not some “bait” as you propound above,

I have no idea where you get your numbers from …
Let´s ignore for the moment the Jewish Almanac´s claim there were more
Jews after WWII than before (and before that, remarkably stable at ~15M).
– The Great One never conquered “Eurasia”; in the to-become German sphere,
there were between 2.5 and 3.5M Jews, of whom 1.5M made it (to the West);
of the rest, 6M were gassed, and to the 18M survivors we are still paying pensions
(the slight inaccuracies are caused by the fact that someone spending the entire
war in London writing anti-German hate screeds is legally a Lolocaust survivor).
– Gen. Ramcke notes the Polish demarcation line was clogged for days with treks
of Jews to the East and Germans to the West; much the same went on farther East
(Lemberg was taken a bit too fast because the Battaillon Nachtigall got wind
the (((NKVD))) were conducting emergency executions of their friends).
– Then there were the two field marshals, fifteen generals, at least 23 bearers of the
oak leaves and 75,000 men who served in the Wehrmacht.

– Josef Mengele was a brilliant pediatrician whose other unforgivable sin was looking
sharp in a SS uniform; only a Stalag porn-addled Itzig would read the casual mention
of triage as “proof” the unfit were murdered, and then GASSED!!! 😫😫😫

IF I am not mistaken, didn’t Hitler offer the Poles a free trade zone in Danzig once it became German again? I also read Pilsudski was agreeable to that, then weeks later he lost his presidency. Sounds like a hidden hand wanted their war, much like today’s Ukraine disaster.

“Hitler stated once again that Danzig was not his ultimate objective…”

Since Danzig had once been the city with the largest German-speaking population more than two centuries earlier – and also the most important port city along the Baltic Sea – there can be no dispute that getting back Danzig was a legitimate objective. Of the three major Polish cities located in the Vistula River drainage basin (the heart of Poland) that I have personally visited, namely Cracow, Warsaw, and Danzig, the latter appeared to me to be the most interesting and aesthetically pleasing, with its Dutch architecture and canals. It should be noted that the main Polish port city of Gdynia, farther north, would have allowed Poland to continue its commerce in the 1930s, so that full German control of Danzig would not have been an impediment. The Polish leadership was being intransigent by refusing the wishes of Danzig’s population to be part of Germany.

Mev, it’s a shame that you weren’t following all of the Holohoax threads in UR in recent years.
There is sooooo much stuff there, each of which eviscerates the official ZOG conjured narrative.
In fact, I’ll make it easy for you. Click on the link below. You need only read the comments from the likes of John Wear, Tippy Toe Lady, HdC, Old Philosopher and yours truly:
https://www.unz.com/article/auschwitz-six-facts-and-seven-questions/?showcomments#comments

Meanwhile, I’ll just focus on one tidbit that single handedly destroys the myth.
Click on the following link titled ‘245,000 Holocaust survivors are still alive in 2024’:
https://voz.us/en/society/240123/10978/245000-holocaust-survivors-are-still-alive-in-2024-16-of-them-are-in-the-united-states.html

Do you understand the implication of that?
So picture this, if someone was a 1 year old baby in 1945 when they were liberated from one of those alleged German extermination centres, by 2024 (79 years later), they were 80 years old.
If someone was 11 years old in 1945, in 2024 they were 90 years old
If someone was 16 years old in 1945, by 2024 they were 95 years old.

So, I think it’s safe to say that the vast majority of the 245,000 Holohoax survivors still alive in 2024 WERE CHILDREN in 1945.
How can that be Mev?
You (and Fran Taubman) promised me that useless eaters were immediately gassed upon arrival.

At the same time, I’m not implying that there were only 245,000 children survivors of the work camps in 1945.
Bear in mind that in many western countries the average age of death for men is about 77, and around 80 for women (give or take).
In other words, in any given western nation, around HALF WILL HAVE ALREADY DIED BEFORE THEIR 80th YEAR.

For certain there were Jewish children that were alive in 1945, but who died BEFORE 2024.
Some lived to 77 years of age, for example.
Some were heavy smokers and died of lung cancer in their 50’s and 60’s.
Some died from misadventure (drowned/car accidents/suicide etc) in their teens/20’s, 30’s etc.

My contention is that THERE WERE AT LEAST ANOTHER QUARTER OF A MILLION Jewish children that were alive and well at war’s end in 1945, that died prior to 2024.
HOW THE EFF IS THIS POSSIBLE MEV?
It is clear that THE GERMANS DID NOT KILL CHILDREN IN THESE CAMPS.

Picture this scenario as well:
An extended family of six (6) Jews arrived in Auschwitz in 1942 (ie: Mother, Father, their two young kids and two grandparents of the children).
Now, Mr Mengele is waiting for them and says to the fit-for-work mother and father, you go in that line over there, you will be assigned to work in the armaments factory.
The elderly parents clutching the small children are told to join another line.

The mother and father inquire about the fate of their kids and parents/in-laws, and are assured that they’ll be looked after.
A week goes by, a month and ….. no word comes of where their progeny/parents are or if they’re even alive.
Mev, are you THAT EFF’N STUPID to believe that any individual would go on working in an environment where they knew their precious children may have been murdered?

CLEARLY, to obtain maximum productivity from a particular worker, the Germans would GUARANTEE that everyone in their immediate family was cared for.
In fact, after working in the armaments factory or wherever during the day, they would more than likely come home in the evening to a barracks where all family members were present and accounted for.
WE KNOW that Auschwitz and the other camps had (for the use of the inmates – not for their guards):

1) A swimming pool
2) An orchestra
3) Regular theatre productions and plays for the entertainment of the inmates
4) A hospital etc.

That is not my opinion. I saw the Shoah videos and this is what these Holohoax survivors ACTUALLY EFF’N SAID.
Look it up Mev if you think I’m making it up.

And it makes sense that the Germans would allow these activities to take place.
Because by doing so they would OBTAIN MAXIMUM PRODUCTIVITY from the inmates.
Mev, you really haven’t put a lot of thought into it, have you?
Once again a reminder of a video I’ve shown you before.
Pay careful attention to what it was really like in these work camps (start at the 3 min mark):

Video Link

In 1933 already, “Judea Declares War on Germany”.

Based on that fact Germany had the right to incarcerate every Jew it could lay its hands on.

That it did not shows the German’s humanity.

Where do I begin Mev?
There are so many falsehoods that have been drummed into your head since birth, and you start with these false premises and proceed from there in your comment.
I suggest you take heed of the following maxim:

‘The search for truth begins with the doubt of all truths in which one has previously believed’.
…… Nietzsche.

Well then, let’s start with this comment of yours:

According to most accounts 2/3 of the arrivals [of Jews arriving at the work camps] were immediately executed. Why would you doubt this?

The question that needs to be asked instead is: WHY WOULD ANYONE BELIEVE THIS?

So let me begin with this analogy:
I approach you and tell you that three legged, four eyed green men live on Mars.
And then I say to you: ‘Prove that I’m wrong’.
‘Oh, you can’t? Then I must be right’.

Let’s understand this: The onus is on the one making the allegation to furnish the evidence to substantiate that assertion.
It is YOU Mev who (like Fran Taubman), asserts that two-thirds of Jewish arrivals (those deemed too young/too old/too incapacitated to work) were immediately gassed.
The fact remains that THERE IS NO FORENSIC EVIDENCE THAT DEMONSTRATES A SINGLE GAS CHAMBER FOR KILLING HUMANS existed at any of the work camps (that were falsely labelled as extermination camps).

There are NO BLUEPRINTS from any German corporation for the construction of these alleged gas chambers – absolutely nothing.
Secondly (and this has been written about numerous times in the various Holohoax threads in UR – some of which I recall you were participating in), we have had comments written by various people (myself included – with links to articles and videos of the modern cremation process), that demonstrated that it took an hour to cremate a typical adult in a MODERN STATE OF THE ART cremation oven which was considerably more efficient than the technology available 80 years ago.

Moreover, if you doubled the number of bodies in a particular muffle in a cremation oven (as some mendacious Jews have suggested), this will double the length of time to complete the cremation.
Simply put, even if we allowed for the fact that those bodies that were cremated were emaciated and below average weight, and even if we miraculously believed that two bodies could be cremated in the time it normally took to cremate a single body, THE NUMBERS DON’T ADD UP.

There cremation ovens would’ve needed to run 24 hours a day (without interruption*) starting in 1941 and ending in 1946 0r 1947 to have cremated the number of Jews that were alleged.
(*Cremation cannot run non stop for days on end. Every so often, perhaps even daily, the process has to be stopped for a few hours, and accumulated gunk needs to be scraped off and muffles need to be cleaned).

Irving’s folly may be understood by considering that he had made his eminent reputation by diligently documenting unpalatable truths. His naivete was in assuming that the truth was sufficient shield against the organized hostility of a Jew-run legal system.

I agree with your suggestion as to learning a trade! We have more than enough pencil-necked paper pushers.

A suggestion here would be in the HVAC field; installing and servicing heating and air conditioning equipment. Complete the training with gas and electric endorsement. These technicians are always in demand, certainly if your house is freezing or boiling inside.

I’m long time retired now but would probably go this route because it is a straight forward path of getting your own business eventually.

Eisenhower didn’t mention anything near the Holocaust is his major War memoir. That doesn’t mean he wasn’t confronted to its importance and magnitude. A whole book was published (collectively) about his first-hand experience as a first-hand witness of the extermination process that was still going on during his sudden irruptions in many of the camps. Eisenhower simply did not deal with the Nazi regime per se when discussing the strictly military operations on the ground. Eisenhower didn’t mention the gulags when dealing with the Soviet’s conduct of the war : he concentrated on the battles. The same remark applies to Churchill who oftentimes mentioned the Jewish holocaust going on during the war as well as the Soviet holocaust he never stopped mentioning. But when it came to write a military history of WWII that was out of subject. The same thing applied to de Gaulle who spoke on the air during his stay in London of the millions of Frenchmen and Jews suffering and starving in German camps. You may on the other hand contend that de Gaulle and Churchill counted on too many Jewish media sources and intelligence to your taste. As for Eisenhower he was of clear Jewish origin and sympathies though not of religion. But please don’t use these authors as a clue that the Holocaust legend was not yet contrived. The only thing that changed is the narrative : before 1978 the Holocaust was described as the mere inauguration phase of a far more global extermination programme leading to the conquest of the German Lebensraum, that was to start with the Jews and also with other religious and cultural elites (many Polish) so as decapitate starting with the best brains the enemy masses to exterminate by hundred of millions so as to let alive on the planet only a SS-like elite and their perfect slaves. After 1978 it was described as something aiming nearly only at Jews and of which only the Jews had been murdered in total innocence as supernatural beings while the extermination of other categories such as gypsies or Catholic elites was normal as per the laws of war between humans.

He did nothing wrong.

Great article to share with Americans brainwashed by Jews. I must add that the 2013 book “How the Jews Defeated Hitler” by Jewish author Benjamin Ginsberg (pen name) details and even brags about everything that Lindbergh and others had stated Jews were doing. I am not sure how this escaped Ron’s radar as I have posted it here many times: https://www.amazon.com/How-Jews-Defeated-Hitler-Exploding/dp/1442222387

Yes, Mel Gibson was right! The Jews have been behind all of these major wars. Jewish communism won WW2 and has completely infected the West and most of the world just as the Jews stated they planned to take over the world with communism.

In short: It was the Jews who owned* Britain who provoked it.

* and still own, like they do almost all Western nations

Quote from Ron:

Stalin, however, was under no such political constraints, and from the moment he had signed his long-term peace agreement with Hitler in 1939 and divided Poland, he ramped up his total-war economy to an even higher notch.

Poland had deformed character, somebody like Churchill, possibly even worse. Smigly:

https://realnewsandhistory.com/smigly/

Marshal Pilsudski would go on to become Poland’s head of State until his death in 1935. It is important to note that Hitler and Pilsudski were on good terms. Pilsudski had actually congratulated Hitler on winning the 1933 elections, and the German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact was signed just 10 months after Hitler came to power. According to the Pact, both countries pledged to resolve their problems through bilateral negotiations and to forgo armed conflict.

Underestimating Germany’s resolve, overestimating Poland’s power, and foolishly trusting in the western intriguers who were manipulating his bloated imperialistic ego, Smigly ignored Hitler’s offers and ratcheted up the abuse of Germans trapped in western Prussia and Danzig. The suffering of the Prussian Germans is not “Nazi propaganda.” It is historical fact which the West’s “court historians” have purposely edited out of their “Orwellianized” history books.

Pilsudski was a rational human, Smigly was a popin-jay, which is obvious by his costumes. Modern humans need to eject this “reformation” idea that all people are equal. They are not. Some people should never be near the levers of power.

Just before his death, Pilsudski re-emphasized that Poland should maintain neutral relations with Germany. The death of Pilsudki proved to be a great loss for Germany – a fact which Hitler himself expressed during the closing days of World War II.

Allowing a sociopath, or hubristic types access to the levers of power is always bad, yet we in the west have a continuous stream of bad leaders. This is because “our leaders” are only puppets, being manipulated by international finance capital. Finance capital wants war, and wants to put the world into debts. Debt servitude is their mode of control.

Hoaxing populations via an owned press is easy.