The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Hua Bin Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir ISteve Community James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Al X Griz Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred De Zayas Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Bailey Schwab Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Britannicus Brittany Smith Brooke C.D. Corax C.J. Miller Caitlin Johnstone Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar ChatGPT Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Harvin Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Courtney Alabama Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Skrbina David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Don Wassall Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens E. Geist Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Douglas Stephenson F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Key Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Ganainm Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gavin Newsom Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgia Hayduke Georgianne Nienaber Gerhard Grasruck Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Godfree Roberts Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Garros Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano H.G. Reza Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugh Perry Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras James W. Smith Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Janko Vukic Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jeremy Kuzmarov Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Mamer Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Atwill Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel Davis Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonas E. Alexis Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jorge Besada Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Correro Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth A. Carlson Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin DeAnna Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marc Sills Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Marcy Winograd Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Battaglioli Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Neville Hodgkinson Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Haenseler Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani R, Weiler Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Raymond Wolters Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Faussette Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Rob Crease Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Rose Pinochet RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Seaghan Breathnach Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Starr Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sybil Fares Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Wyatt Reed Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Austin Metcalf Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betar US Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Canary Mission Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Kushner Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlie Kirk Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colombia Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story Covert Action COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Crypto Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Cole David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Deportation Abyss Deportations Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Easter Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Enoch Powell Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve FEMA Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franklin Scandal Franz Boas Fraud Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom Freemasons French French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Flotilla GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Hell Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Huddled Masses Huey Newton Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Inbreeding Income Income Tax India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA Javier Milei JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Paul Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Miller Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Karmelo Anthony Kash Patel Kashmir Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry Ellison Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Maria Corina Machado Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Immigration Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monopoly Monotheism Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natanz Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Deal New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New Testament New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz Noam Chomsky Nobel Peace Prize Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition Nvidia NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise OFAC Oil Oil Industry OJ Simpson Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palantir Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Craig Roberts Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Petro Poroshenko Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Postindustrialism Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qasem Soleimani Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quiet Skies R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race-Ism Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rare Earths Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Red Sea Refugee Crisis Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romans Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds Roy Cohn RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satan Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Bessent Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Steven Witkoff Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tariffs Tatars Taxation Taxes Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Congress US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US State Department USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Civilization Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Race White Racialism White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Whitney Webb Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zohran Mamdani Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
Odd Rabbit
Comments
• My
Comments
562 Comments • 73,500 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    President Putin's press conference on Wednesday in Uzbekistan might have been the most unusual and extraordinary event in his 24-year political career. After addressing the Constitutional issues surrounding Ukrainian President Zelensky's decision to remain in office beyond his four-year term, Putin delivered a brief but disturbing statement on NATO's plan to fire long-range weapons at...
  • @Fin of a cobra
    @Suetonious


    To what extent does Russia’s Orthodox Christian faith influence its decision making?
     
    A lot. It's a crucial element. Putin has made it a central aspect of his presidency: he makes it a point to be seen in church and with patriarch Kirill, for example. Both the political and religious authorities have a shared vision -- and it is eschatological. The Russians know that they have to fight fire with fire: if the Jews can play around with "end times"-level chaos, so can they. The Russians know full well what they're up against: satanic Jews. Here is a quote from an interesting article (original in French):

    This sheds new light on the Russia-West war, and it cannot be dismissed that this eschatological mission influences, at least partially, the decisions of a part of the Russian establishment; it also explains the total support of Patriarch Kirill for Vladimir Putin in this war because, beyond the traditional harmony between the patriarchate and imperial power, it can be estimated that it draws its roots from the same eschatological vision.

    Because, unlike secularized nations, Dugin emphasizes, 'there is a close link between the national and state factors with the eschatological and metaphysical truth of the Orthodox faith.'"

    And he adds (perhaps a bit exaggeratedly): 'The seal of the Third Rome is in the soul of every Russian.'
    https://legrandreveil.wordpress.com/2022/06/16/lenigme-poutine/

     

    Many commenters and writers here on TUR are loath to explore the eschatological level of analysis, which is a shame: without it, they're missing the most important part of the picture. This is especially true when analyzing the Jew-ruled West's Satanic War of Aggression against Russia. Whether or not Putin "really believes" or "has faith" is besides the point: what he and his top leadership are well aware of is that his main enemies -- the top Jews and Christian Zionist lapdogs -- believe in "the end times". So the Russians have to take that into consideration when making geopolitical decisions.

    See also Youssef Hindi: https://katehon.com/en/article/eschatological-war-russia-and-west

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @Odd Rabbit

    “Many commenters and writers here on TUR are loath to explore the eschatological level of analysis, which is a shame: without it, they’re missing the most important part of the picture. ”

    Thanks.
    I agree. They are missin a very important part of the picture.

  • China's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning has agreed to attend next month's Ukrainian peace conference in Switzerland with one proviso, that Russia be invited. Mao said that Beijing supports the “timely convening of an international peace conference that is recognized by both the Russian and Ukrainian sides.” That sounds reasonable, after all, one would expect...
  • @Fin of a cobra

    neither Zelensky nor his handlers in Washington have abandoned the idea of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia -- Ukraine Will Return to Neutrality or Face Partition or Annihilation
     
    The Jew-ruled US will not accept the partition of Ukraine. This may seem "irrational", given the situation on the ground. But no matter how many signals the Russians send to the US, indicating that they will NOT give back the conquered territories, the US pretends it didn't get the message. A few days ago, a State Department official, a Mr. "Patel", gave a press briefing, in which he explains what the US demands are for a peace process even to be considered:

    From our point of view, the solution is simple: The Russian Federation should leave Ukraine, including the territories it occupies and Crimea, to achieve a peaceful resolution. However, President Putin and the Russian Federation have repeatedly shown no interest in doing so.
    https://www.state.gov/?post_type=state_briefing&%3Bp=92333
     
    You gotta love the chutzpah of this State Department Indian! I wonder from whom he learned to be so ridiculously arrogant, heedless of reality, and lacking basic common sense, not to mention any diplomatic capacity whatsoever. When the Jews are not spitting in the whole world's face directly, they put a nice brown shabbos goy in front of the cameras to do it: "The solution is simple"! With that absurd statement, we see that there will be no "peace process". The Jews are indeed adamant: Russia MUST give back the territories.

    But maybe this is not so "irrational" as it seems. If the Jews are so fixated on getting this territory back, there must be a good reason. Let's look for one, shall we? Well, maybe these official Jews like Blinken and the dozens of other high ranking "official" Jews are just a bunch of messenger gofer boys and girls following orders from the Big Jews who don't show their faces. And these Big Jews are following a Plan. A rigid Plan.

    Remember, Jews are sort of autistic and they are not really good at changing plans once they've got one into their head. And neither are they good at conflict resolution: "They may have a history of pursuing their decision until the other person capitulates, and not recognize the signals that it would be wise not to continue the argument", says Asperger's expert Tony Attwood. This seems to apply here. So what's this fantastic Plan that the Big Jews are so fixated on, to the point that they will not allow their messenger-boy Jews to deviate an inch from? I think all the readers here at TUR will recognize the Plan right away:

    It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so far as possible, should not result in territorial gains: war will thus be brought on to the economic ground, where the nations will not fail to perceive in the assistance we give the strength of our predominance...
     
    Yes, the Plan is the good ol' Protocols. I asked my personal chatbot if there were any parallels between the Protocols and official US policy and -- lo and behold! -- even the Jew-controlled AI thinks there is an overlap:

    While the Protocols of Zion describe a covert and manipulative strategy for global dominance, the U.S. actions, although strategic, are largely transparent and aimed at upholding international norms, supporting allies, and countering aggression. The alignment in certain tactics, such as economic and military support, intelligence sharing, and promoting international laws, highlights how global power dynamics and strategies can intersect with both conspiratorial and legitimate geopolitical frameworks.
     

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Thanks. I think you’re right.
    Given the millennia of facts, it’s very hard to believe that they would give up their ’Tikkun-project’ peacefully.
    It’s difficult to be optimistic in the light of facts.

  • If you know anything about traditional Jewish ethics (i.e., Jewish ethics before a great deal of intellectual work was performed aimed at providing a rationale for Judaism as a modern religion in the West—apparent in the Wikipedia article on Jewish ethics), you know that pre-Enlightenment Jewish ethics was entirely based on whether actions applied to...
  • How is a religion to be judged if only a certain people have access to it? Religion is about the truth, the highest and most valuable thing in which the meaning of life lies. If only a certain people have access to this religion, the others are excluded from the truth, the highest and most valuable thing in which the meaning of life lies. What should truth, the highest and most valuable mean if they are reserved for a certain people (ethnic group, tribe) and how does this people treat other peoples?

    How should we judge a people that defines itself through a religion to which only it has access? Without the status of a world religion, the conclusion would be that the Jewish religion is a sect.

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @John Trout
    @Paul Hollenstein


    How should we judge a people that defines itself through a religion to which only it has access? Without the status of a world religion, the conclusion would be that the Jewish religion is a sect.
     
    Of this I completely agree.
    , @anonymouseperson
    @Paul Hollenstein

    Or a cult.

  • @Fin of a cobra

    The Talmud also contains a variety of rules enjoining honesty in dealing with other Jews, but condoning misappropriation of gentile goods, taking advantage of a gentile’s errors in business transactions, and not returning lost articles to gentiles (Katz 1961a, 38).
     
    What MacDonald has shown is that the central question of Jewish Ethics -- "is it good for the Jews?" -- is enshrined in the Talmud, a text even more important than the Torah. I thought that it was just a cultural thing, but MacDonald proves that it is part of their sick religion. Thus, this question takes the form of a Commandment for all Jews:

    Thou shall always ask: Is It Good For the Jews?

    But we must also remember that the Jews have transformed the Jewish People into God Himself (see Jabotinsky, Foxman and many others). Thus when the Torah commands “You shall have no other gods before Me”, the First Commandment", what it really means is this:

    Thou shall have no other gods before The Jewish People.

    This explains why Schneerson said that "The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world….". What he meant is that the Jew, being part of The Jewish People/God Himself, is superior to all the goys in essence. This is why, to the Jews, all goys are expendable, like cattle. And the Jews have already warned us exactly how they will treat us, "When comes the time of our overt rule, the time to manifest its blessings":

    I am in a position to tell you with a clear conscience that at the proper time we, the lawgivers, shall execute judgement and sentence, we shall slay and we shall spare, we, as head of all our troops, are mounted on the steed of the leader. We rule by force of will, because in our hands are the fragments of a once powerful party, now vanquished by us. And the weapons in our hands are limitless ambitions, burning greediness, merciless vengeance, hatreds and malice.

    It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds.
     

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    “But we must also remember that the Jews have transformed the Jewish People into God Himself (see Jabotinsky, Foxman and many others). Thus when the Torah commands “You shall have no other gods before Me”,…”

    This is a very important matter imo…
    it’s easy to believe that Yahweh and the Jews are the same because Y is the product of their own rabbis and exists only in the minds of the rabbis and scriptures they have written. There is no scientific proof of Y’s existence.
    This of course means that the Christians who have the same god are serving the jews when serving their Y. They are fixed in it.
    So Y is the key figure in christian zionism and the jewish/zionist power. Without Y the Zion is powerless or at least not so potent as it is now in the western culture?

    You need not be an atheist if you don’t believe in Y. You can have a different God if you need some like Henry Makow has.
    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=51952

  • Over the last half-dozen years I've regularly cited the work of John Beaty, a respected academic who spent his entire teaching career at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. During World War II, Prof. Beaty served in Military Intelligence and his responsibilities included producing the daily intelligence briefing reports distributed to the White House and...
  • @Yukon Jack
    @Fin of a cobra


    the Gospels are not only different from myths, but are actually their polar opposite: the Gospels turn the usual structure of myths upside down.
     
    The problem with Christian Apologists they start with the premise the Gospels are the truth, then work backwards to make their case, desperately seeking an argument to prove the case for Christ. But the Gospels are not truth, they are primitive blood sacrifice myth put on a Jewish man to redeem Jews. They were written by the Roman State under the direction of Vespasian Flavian, and they were written for a specific purpose - to convert Jews to a pagan type religion like the other ones circulating in Rome at the time. Christ literally replace Mythra, a Persian cult popular with Roman soldiers - this is well documented in numerous books by such authors as Acharya S (DM Murdock). Her work popularized by the movie Zeigeist, here is the sun of god excerpt. Jesus has all the characteristics of previous sun gods:

    Jesus and The Sun God (Zeitgeist excerpt)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmjQ1566ql0

    The Gospels are not history of Jesus first century AD, as Jesus never existed, he is fabrication of the Gospels writers, primarily Josephus. Myth A was used to create Myth B. Many myths put together to create a very good new myth, which fooled the Goyim good. The Gentiles, being gentle by nature loved the gentle Jesus, but the Jews being wolves did not - and kept their Jewish identity. The big joke is that Jesus came to save his people the Jews, and if you are not a Jew, then according to the Gospels you can not be saved. No Gentile can be saved by Jesus according to the NT text.

    But who cares about that little fact, people love the new Jewish Zeus myth, and they believe because they have an innate need to be saved, for eternal life, because humans are sentient and do not want to die and not exist. Personally I could care less about what people believe (most people are irrational if not full on crazy), unless it affects me, and these Zionists are affecting me, thus I write about it. Christian Zionists are subverting Amerika, and thus need to be exposed.

    Regardless of what Christians and their intellectual apologists think, there is no proof of sin, afterlife, soul, Jesus, Yahweh, etc. etc. Every premise in the OT carried over to the NT is unproven assertion. Prove sin exists. If you can not, what is the need for Christ? Prove afterlife exists, if you can not what is the need to be saved? Prove the God of the Bible is a real deity, if you can not why worry about afterlife judgment? No one can prove the existence of Jesus, so why believe in him? In fact why believe anything, if you do not have proof, admit it and carry on being rational.

    Regardless of all of that, do you really think Jerusalem is the center of the universe? Do you really think God judges us? Do you really think that some human actions can be sins, that keep you from the divine forever and ever? I do not. Since I do not operate in fear of hell, or of God, what need do I have for Gospels? They are clearly fiction, but considered real by billions because humans want to live forever. It is the promise of eternal life that keeps the game of myth going and going. The preacher takes in mucho shekels, but never has to deliver the car. It is the world's greatest con game, religion sells an unproven promise of afterlife of which there is no proof.

    I often use the deer hunting argument, when I shoot a deer, do I think anything else but it died. Do I think the deer went on to the afterlife? No I do not, that is ridiculous. Thus why am I any different? I am just an animal like a deer, the only real difference is I know I exist, and thus I have an innate need to beat death. But I can not. I admit that because I am honest, but the rest of the world - the religionists - are not honest, they are liars. They are selling an impossibility, a way to beat death by mere belief. Since this need to live forever is so great, no amount of reason, logic, evidence will ever convince the believers, they will always come up with some argument to prove their case.

    Whoever or whatever created humans did us a great disservice. At one time we were wild and free and not afraid of death like we are now. Along came the Anunnaki, took some wild hominid and made us by changing our DNA, a big brained, self aware, domesticated, slave specie. That IMO was the real Original Sin, or call it the Original Crime. The gods who created us should not be worshipped, but despised. All the Abrahamic religions are Anunnaki Cargo Cults. Time to wake up and break free. You do not need your soul to be saved, just your mind from bad myth.

    Replies: @Unbornawakened, @Odd Rabbit, @Paul C.

    Good comment. Thanks.
    It’s difficult to disagree with you.
    But I can not believe in those Annunakis like you seem to believe.

    I wrote a longer comment but I see it’s not published.
    I’m disappointed.
    I expressed in that comment that if you read this book of Lehmann so could you write a comment and
    make a report on it here.

  • @Fin of a cobra

    the expulsion of the Jews from Palestine was merely a myth, modern Jews were very substantially the descendants of later converts, and today’s Palestinians were indeed probably the direct descendants of the ancient Judeans.

    the majority of present-day Jews both in Europe and elsewhere were probably the descendants of later converts rather than the ancient Israelites of the Bible

    The tremendous historical irony that the current Palestinians—now suffering horrifying massacres in Gaza—are almost certainly the closest lineal descendants of the Biblical Israelites
     
    If the Palestinians are the closest descendents of biblical Israelites, why did they completely abandon Judaism? Wouldn't the Palestinians show at least some minimal traces of their ancient religion and practices even today? Could their ancestors really have written the Torah? Doesn't seem plausible since the Palestinians are not a very sophisticated population, whereas it seems probable and even likely that the ancestors of the present-day Jews were the original writers of the Old Testament. Why? Because there are just too many stories of deception in the Bible that fit perfectly with the definition of the Jew through the ages: the Jews are the Masters of Lies.

    SCHOPENHAUER'S FIRST FOOTNOTE DELETED IN ENGLISH TRANSLATION: ... two Roman classics also indicate the degree to which the Jews have been detested and despised at all times and by all nations: the reason for this may lie in the fact that they were the only people on earth who believed in no future life apart from this earthly life, i.e., human beings were regarded as animals. The Jews are the scum of the earth, but they are also great masters in lying [Auswurf der Menschheit, aber große Meister im Lügen] . [literally: "and were therefore regarded as cattle, scum of the earth, but also great masters in lying".]
    -- From Parerga and Paralipomena
     

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Odd Rabbit, @Blissex, @Brás Cubas

    “…the reason for this may lie in the fact that they were the only people on earth who believed in no future life apart from this earthly life, i.e., human beings were regarded as animals.”

    Can we say that at least in this matter they were honest. There really are no scientific facts to support life after death and we are animals and a part of nature.
    But a very special part with brains able to build a consciousness which allows separation from the nature and the living in fantasy or outside the reality.

    F..cobra, I read your favorite philosopher Schopenhauer what he says about the Jewish religion:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Schopenhauer#Philosophy
    …this is an excerpt from wiki:

    —[Judaism] is, therefore, the crudest and poorest of all religions and consists merely in an absurd and revolting theism. It amounts to this that the κύριος [‘Lord’], who has created the world, desires to be worshipped and adored; and so above all he is jealous, is envious of his colleagues, of all the other gods; if sacrifices are made to them he is furious and his Jews have a bad time
    … It is most deplorable that this religion has become the basis of the prevailing religion of Europe; for it is a religion without any metaphysical tendency. While all other religions endeavor to explain to the people by symbols the metaphysical significance of life, the religion of the Jews is entirely immanent and furnishes nothing but a mere war-cry in the struggle with other nations.[77]

    That’s the danger/and the problem, it can furnish a war-cry with other nations when absent any metaphysical.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Odd Rabbit

    so true. one of the 613 is thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.

    what is called jewish mysticism is nothing of the sort. it's witchcraft. it's despicable.

    compare the great mystics of islam, christianity, the vedantists, some schools of buddhism. there is no comparison. the much promoted jewish genius is totally absent.

    has ron become such a mental defective that he is considering foreskin reconstruction surgery?

    that would be sad.

  • @Yukon Jack

    In recent years, many anti-Zionists of all ideological stripes have also taken up that same theory, arguing that the European Jews who settled in Palestine were actually Khazars and therefore had no legitimate claim to that land. Indeed, among anti-Jewish or anti-Zionist activists on the Internet, “Khazar” has become quite common as a denigrating synonym for “Jew.”

    Current efforts to promote this Khazar Hypothesis may have a practical political dimension. These days an important part of American support for Israel relies upon the large body of Christian Zionists, who identify today’s Jews with the Israelites of the Old Testament. Such Christians strongly supported the return of these exiled Jews to their ancient homeland and the restoration of a Jewish state in Palestine after two thousand years, regarding these events as the fulfillment of the biblical prophecies necessary for the return of Christ. So if they became convinced that Jews were instead Central Asian Khazars, their support might wane.
     
    The real reason why modern Jews have no claim to Palestine is because there's no "god" doing land deals with humans. The idea of some Almighty God leading his Chosen Ones around and giving them some land is laughably insane. If God was Omnipotent it would not take thousands of years for Him to accomplish such a simple task, after all He created the Universe according to the Holy Book. The Holy Bible and the Torah/Tanak is the greatest literary hoax, mythology cobbled together from older myths, which became the "supermyth" of the last 3,090 years. But myth it is, which means NOT TRUE.

    How do we know the Bible is myth? Because the characters and story lines, creation accounts are lifted from other cultures, adopted by the writers to create a new myth, a new story line, one which favors Jews. Even the Jews described in the Old Testament are myth, so says Shlomo Sands. Who wrote the Bible and when is a big question, a big conspiracy if there was ever one. The likely suspect are scholars in employment of the elite, because religion is sophisticated mind control for the elite to rule without resistance. Sorry to tell you all - their ain't no god giving us any rules. We invented all the rules and all of the gods, and if you want to argue that, prove it or shut the fuck up about your god who isn't there. Like Richard Dawkins says, GOD IS A DELUSION.

    There is no reason to be a Jew, anymore than being a Christian, since Jesus too, is 100% fiction proven in Joseph Atwill's landmark book "Caesar's Messiah". Atwill patiently explains how the Roman State, under the Flavians, wrote the Gospels (God Spells). He explains why they wrote them - to convert Jews to a pacific religion tolerable to the rule of law. No god would ever tell you to obey corrupt government and pay taxes, but in the New Testament, Romans 13 does.

    In Hindu mythology, the Lord Brahma marries his sister Saraswati, in the Torah, aBraham marries his sister Sara. Sarah's maid servant is Hagar, named from the Ghaggar river in India. David is derived from the Dravidian speaking peoples of South India. The Flood account stolen from the Sumerians, ISRAEL is the name of 3 Egyptian gods ISis, RA, and ELohim. The first Christian churches were converted Persian cult Mythra temples. The primary writer of the Gospels is JoSEphUS, who encoded his own name as JESUS, who amazed the scribes in the temple just as Josephus says he did when he was a teenager in the temple.

    So what is the bottom line? The entire Holy Bible, from the Garden and Eden to Jesus on the cross redeeming the world is 100% pure myth, not real in any way, and thus these modern Jews from Eastern Europe and Russia have no claim to Palestine - and thus need to wake up from their trance and get the fuck out - and quit killing the natives - the unfortunates who just happen to live their when these crazed Judeo religionists, those under the spell of the myth, acted on the myth and moved to establish the hell state of Israel. Every Jew must believe in Abraham, but sorry to tell ya, Abraham never existed. They are all loons, including these Evangelist Christians who think Christ is going to return. Sorry to tell you, Christ never existed and thus can not return. No Rapture either, you will only be "taken up in the air" by Russian nukes going off in your town.

    Hell has been created by belief in the myth, and these Christian Zionists are the supporters of Israel, and thus are aiding and abetting the Gaza genocide. Myth, belief, faith are the real culprits here, as is this so-called holy book - which is not holy at all, the Holy Bible is actually a terrorism manual - killing everything in the name of God. The Holy Bible teaches how to kill without guilt, in the name of the highest authority. Killing becomes duty to the Lord, which is actually the State, and in the case of ZOG USA the Jewish controlled state. Lunatics like Biden and Blinken giving Israel unlimited monies and weapons is beyond insane. Biden and Blinken, plus Nuland, should hang next to Bibi and that fat bastard preacher John Hagee, founder of CUFI.

    Replies: @SuseJ, @Anon, @Wang Shui, @James J. O'Meara, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Odd Rabbit, @HT, @Kali, @Derer, @Pythas, @remo

    Thanks.
    God comment, difficult to disagree.

    What wonders me//has wondered a long time, is that so many people//even high educated, today believe in such myths like this.
    And they believe so strong that the reason/the scientific facts can be forgotten … believe despite the fact that the science doesn’t support them in any way.
    They must be someway insane believing what they hear from the rabbis mouths and want to blindly believe in it.
    Their own want seems to be the primary motive to believe and they are ready to cheat themselves. Yet in many other things they still believe in the facts of science.
    Why is it so difficult to accept a different God?
    Henry Makow recommends:
    …excerpt from the link:
    [–“Satanists have programmed our minds to shut down at the mention of “God,” our loving Creator, and benefactor.
    For Satanists, God is the competition.
    So they created this ridiculous straw man image of an omnipotent God and held Him responsible for all that goes wrong, when in fact, God depends on us to do His will.
    We can’t find God because we are God. Obviously, not the Creator but our true identity is that spark of Divinity which God implanted in the human soul.
    I asked an “atheist” if she believed in a difference between good and evil. She said she did. Then you believe in God, I said.
    God is the Moral Order.
    Our desire for God, our spiritual ideals — for beauty, truth, goodness, love, and justice— define us as human. “]
    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=51952

    • Replies: @skrik
    @Odd Rabbit


    What wonders me//has wondered a long time, is that so many people//even high educated, today believe in such myths like this.
    And they believe so strong that the reason/the scientific facts can be forgotten … believe despite the fact that the science doesn’t support them in any way.
    They must be someway insane believing what they hear from the rabbis mouths and want to blindly believe in it
     
    [my bolding] The scam of all ‘life after death’ religions is based on fear [often deliberately invoked in immature, before ‘the age of reason’ minds], namely the fear of [personal] death. A 2nd scam is the ‘creator’ nonsense; what is always was [conservation laws + ‘big bang’ = phase-change only].

    Sorry ‘believers’ [but not too sorry]; no ‘life after death’ plus no ‘creator’ = you're entirely on your own; enjoy life while you can = ‘carpe diem.’

  • America’s universities are on fire. A protest movement against the violence in Gaza and U.S. colleges’ complicity in them has swept the nation, with encampments on college campuses in 45 of America’s 50 states. The crackdown has been swift; thousands of students have been arrested, charged, fined, lost their degrees, or even deported. Amid corporate...
  • @Fin of a cobra
    @Ghali


    Anyone who dares to criticize Israel will be removed immediately, if not murdered by Jews.
     
    Why? Because criticizing Israel hits too close to home: those who do are one step away from criticizing The Jews Themselves. That must be avoided at all costs. This is why The Jews will "murder" -- as you correctly point out -- anyone daring to criticize Israel. Unz has shown this in his recent article titled "Israeli Assassinations and Public Scrutiny", which he closes off with these two sentences:

    Six months of unrelenting Israeli attacks upon the population of Gaza may have caused enormous numbers of Americans to begin asking questions they had never previously considered. This may constitute the most important lasting legacy of the current Gaza war.
     
    A couple of these questions are: "why are those critical of Israel destroyed or murdered?"; and "who is really ruling our country?" If Americans finally see what we all here at TUR can see, if they start realizing what to us is so obvious -- that the murderous, genocidal Jews run America -- then a tectonic shift would begin to happen: "our entire political landscape would be radically transformed", writes Unz.

    Why do the Jews feel so strongly about murdering immediately "anyone who dares to criticize Israel", as you say? Because what the Jews fear most is personal initiative. The Jews fear the initiative of a single genius more than they do the movement of millions upon millions: the Jews are masters of manipulating the masses, but they can't control the genius with initiative -- and thus these mavericks must be murdered. The Jews clearly outlined this as a principle over a hundred years ago and I've pointed this out before, but it's worth quoting again:

    THERE IS NOTHING MORE DANGEROUS THAN PERSONAL INITIATIVE: if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord.
     
    The Jews have transformed this insight into a foundational principle within their strategy to dominate the West and the world: "Paralyze Initiative", they command. How? Usually, just by buying people out with cold hard cash, as they have done with the entirety of the US congress (such a pathetic sight to behold). They are not bashful about admitting this simple tactic: the Jews stoke people's greed and their love of money, which is normally enough to kill off all initiative. People (and universities) who have been bought out by The Jews are easy to control, as the article above shows.

    If killing initiative by buying it out doesn't work, the Jews will simply kill the "initiator" himself. That's what all those assassinations Unz painstakingly documented were all about: killing a genius maverick with initiative. This ancient insight is so ingrained in the Jew psyche that a Jew turned it into a "law": Price's Law. Derek de Solla Price was an expert of "scientometrics" and his law describes the distribution of scientific productivity: only a small percentage of people are responsible for the majority of the output in any given field (50% of the work is done by the square root of the total number of people who participate in the work). Isn't that a perfect example of the impact of an individual with initiative has anywhere -- including politics --compared to the masses?

    Another Jew who intuitively grasped the Man with Initiative Question was Isaac Asimov: the character The Mule in his Foundation series was a perfect example. Because of his abilities to manipulate the emotions and the thoughts of others (how Jews love talking about their superpower, for God's sake!), The Mule almost singlehandedly changed the course of history. What the world needs is a Goy Mule who will exploit the Jews' weaknesses and fears and bring down their evil Jew Empire. (And at this point I know what some are thinking: "But we already had our Mule -- Jesus, our Messiah -- and that didn't work out too well for us...".)

    So the Jews know both intuitively, fictionally and "scientifically", as shown by Price's Law and Asimov's Mule, that the Man with Initiative is the one who has the capacity for changing the political landscape, more so than all of the sheeple combined. These Men with Initiative are the ones whose actions and ideas can disrupt the status quo of Jew Rule, despite all the chaos and mayhem the Jews have spread, despite the facehugger vice grip the Jews have imposed on the collective consciousness of the West, causing complete inertia of the masses.

    The Jews have given us their game plan. They have shown us what their biggest fears are. And this is also why so many commenters here have intuitively grasped the dangers that someone like Ron Unz -- a Man with Initiative -- is currently facing and thus have warned him to take precautions to guarantee his own safety. The Jews show no compunction about mercilessly killing anyone, even members of their own Tribe, in their relentless psychopathic drive towards complete world domination.

    Replies: @cousin lucky, @Odd Rabbit, @Theophrastus, @ghali, @MarLuc7

    “The Jews have given us their game plan.”

    Yes, they have. They have said it now quite open. It’s no more a conspiracy.
    Personally, I worry about the fate of Europe.
    Like America, it is now a prisoner of that plan and is at war with the East/BRICS countries as a vassal of the London Zionists.
    For some reason the white man has not been able to hold his own and is threatened with extinction in his own countries.
    Where is the fault? And can it be fixed?
    Can the BRICS do better or is the Tribe invincible in its relentless psychopathic drive towards complete world domination?

    • Replies: @annamaria
    @Odd Rabbit

    The tribe became triumphant upon capturing the previously mighty US. It’s next destination will be, most likely, Argentina.

    The overall dynamics does not look good for the zionized private banking cartel (the FedReserve/ City of London). The usurers can’t be good keepers, and the state of US finances proves this.

    Jewish IQ turned out to be average, despite the many claims on “superior Jewish intelligence,” which happened to be of the same unreliable kind as the claims on “special Jewish victimhood” and “superior Jewish morality.” Considering the facts on the ground, all these Jewish claims are fraudulent.

    Hopefully, the tribe will lose the young generation of bright Jews. Who wants to be a Jewish fascist?

    The indecent shoah-biz has been mortally wounded by the ongoing Genocide of the Palestinian children and women. The Israeli supremacist lunatics have articulated with great clarity the core of “Judaic values.”

    The tribe is helpless without plump hosts and the other peoples’ civilizations. Time came for global ostracism of the talmudic / zionist monstrosity.

    Replies: @John Trout

  • @Anonymous
    If someone reading this is wondering why all of a sudden the jackboots are coming down to destroy college age protesters who are against the jewish genocide of the Palestinian people, but several years ago the jackboots did literally NOTHING as violent "protesters" for the "Black Lives Matter" movement looted business, burned down those same business, and literally murdered people, well, it's because the USA and most of the West is largely under jewish occupation, the same as Palestine.

    The West is under jewish occupation, just as Palestine is under jewish occupation. The occupation between the two are different, in that the jewish occupation of Palestine is more overt, (it's a military occupation after all, complete with a mounted gun powered by AI that scans the faces of all Palestinians entering and exiting a checkpoint, firing at them if the AI computes a match in an Israeli database), and the jewish occupation of the west is more "covert" (it's almost a crime at this point to call attention to jewish power in the west, you literally risk losing your job, income, future employment, etc...).

    These college protesters are figuring out the hard way who runs the show in the US. The nucleus of the power apparatus in the West is, of course, organized jewish power. Many of these college protestors and young people are probably wondering at this point: "we are all protected under free speech laws right? Why are the police allowed to do this to us?". Well, the jew hates free speech because truth is the greatest threat to organized jewery, as much of the "jewish" identity is based around lies, (God's chosen people, the existence of the ancient land of Israel, the ridiculously exaggerated pogroms, and most notoriously, the "holocaust", all lies). Christian parents tell their kids make believe stories of Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, while jewish parents tell their offspring make believe stories of jewish suffering, persecution, the holocaust and victimhood. Victimhood is the glue that holds together the jewish soul.

    Anyway, to finish up this diatribe, I'm just going to make one thing very clear: what is happening in Palestine will happen to much of the world, especially the West and Western peoples, if we do not resist and fight back against organized jewery.

    Replies: @cousin lucky, @Rich23, @Odd Rabbit, @DanFromCT, @N30rebel, @NotAnonymousHere, @dina

    ” I’m just going to make one thing very clear: what is happening in Palestine will happen to much of the world, especially the West and Western peoples,”

    Gilad Atzmon, who left Israel, has said in his book (Being in Time) that “we are all Palestinians” and has warned the west.

    …Alan Macleod has written a good article in which he laments the fate of his country and blames the Jews//and for good reason//….but why blame others… it’s the fault of the American themselves.
    Why have they done anything to keep the country in their own hands and under their own control.
    It’s easy to blame the conqueror
    if you don’t defend yourself and let destroy yourself – (that’s happening in Europe too); …. unlike Russia and BRICS.
    They want be sovereign…keeping their countries under the control of their own people
    and refuse to go down in front of the power of the Zionist ‘Judean Empire’.

    • Replies: @one nobody
    @Odd Rabbit

    "Why have they done anything to keep the country in their own hands and under their own control."

    If you are going to blame American's then you must also blame another hundred countries along the ages. Blaming a home owner for being robbed is blaming the victim.

    "It’s easy to blame the conqueror
    if you don’t defend yourself and let destroy yourself..."

    If the Zionists had come at the American People head on, we would have sent the Rednecks to deal with them and all that would be left of the encounter is shotgun shells, beer cans and alot of dead zionists. However, the zionist, Levites, or whatever their name is at the time in history, I call them the Thirteenth Tribe of psychopaths, do not show up to conquer, they seep into a country and grow in form and effect as a spider cancer.
    Then the only cure is a return to the Almighty with a promise to quit usury, intoxication and pornography, all of which are mega profit centers for the zionists.

    Replies: @Crush Limbraw

  • The IDF (Israel Defense Forces) continues to martyr the Palestinians, as it marches them up and down and across the Via Dolorosa that is the Gaza Strip. By the time you read this—and as I write—the number of Palestinians murdered, maimed and displaced by The Devil’s agents will be, already is, out of date. Jump...
  • @Mrs Keays
    Throughout history Israel has never looked at non-jews as anything but people who should be eliminated or made slaves to the jew. They indoctrinate their children with this hate. Years of inbreeding has created an insular mentally ill citizenry. America will soon be the lone wolf supporting this barbaric country. Anyone in the US government with dual citizenship needs to get out NOW!

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Wokechoke, @Abhuman

    “Israel has never looked at non-jews as anything but people who should be eliminated or made slaves to the jew”

    Agree, and if you read their own rabbis and their holy writings they openly tell this you and don’t see anything wrong in it.

  • @Voltaria Voltaire
    @Odd Rabbit

    I can see why, Old Rabbit, you say what you say, however, whether you choose to believe it or not, the mind indeed does exist independent of the body and the genes. Genes are WAY overrated. Eugenical Psychos use genetics and eugenics to keep people ignorant and enslaved, if not outright destroyed. YOU, my friend are much, much, MUCH more than your genes or your body, WHATEVER your heritage. Painful incidents like death and birth cause the mind to forget. You probably don't remember the exact specifics from the hours of your birth, but it certainly does not mean it didn't happen, right? I mean, here you are!

    Education, not genes, is the superior factor in how a person reacts to their life and social circumstances. In our world plenty of MIS-education goes on all thruout our lives, and has a history of screwing things up pretty badly.

    Believe what you want. I believe in freedom of belief. But keep your eyes and your mind open, lest you shut out truths that can be useful to you. That is what the slave masters desire.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    You say: “Believe what you want. I believe in freedom of belief. ”

    Ok, but I can not believe what I want. I can believe only what I can understand and which is real and can be proved true.
    It’s you who believes in freedom of belief. I can not allow for me such a freedom because it’s dangerous when not controlled by the reason.

    • Replies: @Voltaria Voltaire
    @Odd Rabbit

    Ok. Believe what you can understand. Ok with me. Needs and wants are separate things. Understanding can grow though, right? Stevie Wonder agrees too: "when people believe in things they don't understand.......superstition.....la, la la". Also known as a fixed idea. I don't know anyone who doesn't have at least SOME. Mostly without even being aware of them. I'm all for understanding.

  • @Odd Rabbit
    @Fin of a cobra

    Thanks again for your interesting comment, Fin of a cobra!

    --“Is Israeli Society Sick, Too?”, I would also say yes, but it is much more than just Israel: The Jews, as a people, are “sick”. What kind of sickness? Friedman gives us the answer above: it is a cancer. What type of cancer? --

    Here are the thoughts it provoked in me:
    Could it be a 'spiritual cancer'/disease, passed down from generation to generation through religious rituals that act like genes in cells: replicating their own message.
    Personally, I cannot explain this 'spiritual cancer' and its origins other than through genes.
    It is primarily a product of genes like all the contents of the mind. The genes react to the environment and a consciousness and mind is born which starts to explain things and look for causes. Religion and god are born with no other or real basis that can stand up to the criteria of science. It's the mind's own product that starts to be taken as reality
    and the genes like it because of the pleasure its produces.
    ...Why is it that not everyone within the same race believes the same way even when manipulated with the same techniques/beliefs.

    I believe that the reason can only be genetic: a small difference in genes.
    Within the same race we can see therefore even big differences: someone believes in god, someone doesn't believe at all. Some are very aggressive, egoists, others altruists who cannot kill others but sacrifice themselves. There is no shortage of examples.
    I have two dogs of the same breed and they behave differently in many ways, even though they are of the same sex.
    What I'm trying to say is that primarily everything is more genetic than we want to believe, even morality.
    ...I believe there are genes that are typical of a race but they don't bind everyone and that's why there are even big differences within a race in individuals.
    The higher you rise in the hierarchy of power within a race, the closer you are to the homogeneity of genes because power cannot be maintained and maintained otherwise.
    And that's where the genes condense and control the most and the strongest.
    What do you think of these ideas?
    Have I lost my sense of reality, or does this make sense...?
    http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/THOC/enigma_code.pdf

    Replies: @Voltaria Voltaire, @Odd Rabbit

    “..…Why is it that not everyone within the same race believes the same way even when manipulated with the same techniques/beliefs.”

    That’s true, there are always some who are resistant to indoctrination and manipulation. Why?
    They can not accept it, they don’t like it or don’t tolerate it at all. Why?
    They must have something in their genes which makes it bad, something that is not good for them… some kind of ‘genetic instinct’
    I cannot explain/understand it otherwise.

  • @Voltaria Voltaire
    @Odd Rabbit

    Body, Mind, Spirit. Genes are a physical component of the body. The brain is a physical part of the body. It is possible to know more about the mind and spirit without becoming an expert in Biology or Genetics.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    “It is possible to know more about the mind and spirit without becoming an expert in Biology or Genetics.”

    Of cause it’s possible but basically there’s no mind without biology and genes. The mind and culture exists and functions on their terms.
    When different races have different genes they function/behave differently.

    • Replies: @Voltaria Voltaire
    @Odd Rabbit

    I can see why, Old Rabbit, you say what you say, however, whether you choose to believe it or not, the mind indeed does exist independent of the body and the genes. Genes are WAY overrated. Eugenical Psychos use genetics and eugenics to keep people ignorant and enslaved, if not outright destroyed. YOU, my friend are much, much, MUCH more than your genes or your body, WHATEVER your heritage. Painful incidents like death and birth cause the mind to forget. You probably don't remember the exact specifics from the hours of your birth, but it certainly does not mean it didn't happen, right? I mean, here you are!

    Education, not genes, is the superior factor in how a person reacts to their life and social circumstances. In our world plenty of MIS-education goes on all thruout our lives, and has a history of screwing things up pretty badly.

    Believe what you want. I believe in freedom of belief. But keep your eyes and your mind open, lest you shut out truths that can be useful to you. That is what the slave masters desire.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

  • @Fin of a cobra
    @Anonymous


    The older generation were brainwashing their children ... This control goes from generation to generation.
     
    Your comment made me think of a great book, titled Generation to Generation: family process in church and synagogue, by Edwin H. Friedman, based on Murray Bowen's Family Systems Theory. It's well worth a read and maybe I'll put some extended quotes in another comment if any of my fellow commenters are interested. But here is a short quote to begin with:

    The cells of the human body change rapidly from day to day and do almost a complete turnover every couple of years. It should not be surprising, therefore, that with families and congregations also, if there is a cancer in the system, the change-over in "cells" from year to year or from generation to generation will not necessarily effect a change in a malignant process. This is also why the transfusion of "new blood" or the performing of "major operations" rarely gets to the fundamental (systemic) problem.
     
    So to answer Ilana's question, "Is Israeli Society Sick, Too?", I would also say yes, but it is much more than just Israel: The Jews, as a people, are "sick". What kind of sickness? Friedman gives us the answer above: it is a cancer. What type of cancer? The Jews, as a people, suffer from the "Goy is the Enemy Tumor" (GET). What the Jews have in their extended "family system" is this GET cancer since time immemorial and no matter how many generations go by it will just not go away: channeling Friedman, it becomes obvious that this is a fundamental, systemic problem.

    The Jews' collective identity is based on goy hatred. It's what stabilizes their whole "family system", but for it to remain relatively stable the Jews must perpetuate their conflicts with the goys, even if it means a few genocides here and there. Jews pass on this GET cancer down to their children and this goy-is-the-enemy sickness gets so ingrained into their personality that it becomes an integral part of their personal identity. And then these children fit in with the rest of the Jews, forming a collective identity, that is, a whole people with the GET cancer. It is a perpetual cycle that continues to reverberate through the ages -- in saecula saeculorum.

    What's worse is that this extreme Jewish anxiety and hatred of goys has probably been increasing over time and has now become entrenched as part of Jewish identity: in each subsequent generation, the GET cancer seems to get worse. Now the Jews commit genocide right out in the open and rub it in the whole goy world's face unabashedly. The Jews could care less what the goy world thinks of them. Now their power is so great that they can exercise it openly.

    If this is true, what awaits us a few generations down the line is a Goy is the Enemy Tumor that has metastasized throughout the Jew body politic to such an extent that they will put their final solution for the goys into execution phase: using bioweapons that they are already working on, the Jews will exterminate all the goys on earth.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @Jim H, @ariadna, @Daniel Rich, @Odd Rabbit, @Ruckus

    Thanks again for your interesting comment, Fin of a cobra!

    –“Is Israeli Society Sick, Too?”, I would also say yes, but it is much more than just Israel: The Jews, as a people, are “sick”. What kind of sickness? Friedman gives us the answer above: it is a cancer. What type of cancer? —

    Here are the thoughts it provoked in me:
    Could it be a ‘spiritual cancer’/disease, passed down from generation to generation through religious rituals that act like genes in cells: replicating their own message.
    Personally, I cannot explain this ‘spiritual cancer’ and its origins other than through genes.
    It is primarily a product of genes like all the contents of the mind. The genes react to the environment and a consciousness and mind is born which starts to explain things and look for causes. Religion and god are born with no other or real basis that can stand up to the criteria of science. It’s the mind’s own product that starts to be taken as reality
    and the genes like it because of the pleasure its produces.
    …Why is it that not everyone within the same race believes the same way even when manipulated with the same techniques/beliefs.

    I believe that the reason can only be genetic: a small difference in genes.
    Within the same race we can see therefore even big differences: someone believes in god, someone doesn’t believe at all. Some are very aggressive, egoists, others altruists who cannot kill others but sacrifice themselves. There is no shortage of examples.
    I have two dogs of the same breed and they behave differently in many ways, even though they are of the same sex.
    What I’m trying to say is that primarily everything is more genetic than we want to believe, even morality.
    …I believe there are genes that are typical of a race but they don’t bind everyone and that’s why there are even big differences within a race in individuals.
    The higher you rise in the hierarchy of power within a race, the closer you are to the homogeneity of genes because power cannot be maintained and maintained otherwise.
    And that’s where the genes condense and control the most and the strongest.
    What do you think of these ideas?
    Have I lost my sense of reality, or does this make sense…?
    http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/THOC/enigma_code.pdf

    • Replies: @Voltaria Voltaire
    @Odd Rabbit

    Body, Mind, Spirit. Genes are a physical component of the body. The brain is a physical part of the body. It is possible to know more about the mind and spirit without becoming an expert in Biology or Genetics.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    , @Odd Rabbit
    @Odd Rabbit

    "..…Why is it that not everyone within the same race believes the same way even when manipulated with the same techniques/beliefs."

    That's true, there are always some who are resistant to indoctrination and manipulation. Why?
    They can not accept it, they don't like it or don't tolerate it at all. Why?
    They must have something in their genes which makes it bad, something that is not good for them... some kind of 'genetic instinct'
    I cannot explain/understand it otherwise.

  • Below is a slightly condensed and edited transcript of today’s interview with Richie Allen. Richie Allen: The Israelis say, “not us, we didn't do it.” I'm inclined to not know what to think. I'm looking for motivation. And I'm thinking, well, Khamenei will just find another guy like the president and nothing will change. What...
  • @Odd Rabbit
    @Fin of a cobra

    "When you are on the verge of consuming your “widely conceived plan” you are NOT desperate: you are jubilant. You’re laughing and cheering all the way to the bank."

    Like Churchill in this excerpt from the link:
    ---This is strikingly reminiscent of Winston Churchill. When war with Germany nearly came in the summer of 1911, Edward Grey, the Foreign Secretary, was impressed that while most ministers were away from Westminster, Churchill, “…not tied to London by official work, kept me company for love of the crisis. … his high-mettled spirit was exhilarated by the air of crisis and high events.”[9] According to Roy Jenkins, in 1914, “Amid the gathering storm, Churchill was a consistent force for intervention and ultimately for war.”[10]
    https://www.unz.com/article/beaconsfield-revisited/

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Addendum to previous comment
    More from the same link:

    …Disraeli was excited at the prospect of war. After he gained the upper hand in the Cabinet, “Derby found Disraeli ‘excited and inclined to swagger’, when he saw him on 11 February [1878]; he was ‘saying war was unavoidable’ and that although it would last ‘three years it would be a glorious and successful war for England’.
    Derby was ‘disgusted with his reckless way of talking, and evident enjoyment of an exciting episode in history, with which his name was to be joined’; this was the antithesis of Conservative statesmanship.”[8]. …This is strikingly reminiscent of Winston Churchill. When war with Germany nearly came in the summer of 1911, Edward Grey, the Foreign Secretary, was impressed ….

  • The opening graphic has a sentence with the word MARTYROOM – not sure what word that is. Martydom? Anyways, good article with lots of interesting tidbits. Good job Kevin slam dunking the Israeli apologist Richie Allen with Israel did 911 and 7/7:

    Richie Allen: But have you any proof that Israel did it?

    Kevin Barrett: Of course not. That’s way above my pay grade.

    Richie Allen: You know, I’m not being silly or childish when I ask that. But, you know, Israel has been blamed for it. from everything from September the 11th—

    Kevin Barrett: Which they did.

    Richie Allen: —to the (7/7/2005) bombings in London—

    Kevin Barrett: Which they did.

    IMO Richie Allen is highly uninformed on false flags, who does them, and why. Paul Wellstone and JFK assassinations were brought up but you forgot to mention General Soleimani. Israel has been routinely killing Iranian top officials and scientists, which is why a reasonable mind would immediately suspect Israel in this latest death. But Paul Richie, the dummkopf Brit blockhead, can’t put 2 and 2 together. Any world leader dies, think Israel first. To deny that is ignorance.

    And now Netanyahu and his friends are going down. They need to turn this into World War III. They need to drag the U.S. into their war against Iran. And by murdering the Iranian president, they guarantee that Iran, once it determines that that’s what happened, is going to have to retaliate.

    [MORE]

    Indeed, the Son of Perdition, Netahyahu is going down and he is taking Israel with him. Good riddance to both. I like to imagine them all rotting in hell, but that can only be my wishful thinking and Bible imagery coming to mind. The son of perdition can not be saved, and certainly Netanyahu is the Son of Perdition:

    Mormon website – “The followers of Satan who will suffer with him in eternity. Sons of perdition include (1) those who followed Satan and were cast out of heaven for rebellion during premortality and (2) those who were permitted to be born to this world with physical bodies but then served Satan and turned utterly against God. Those in this second group will be resurrected from the dead but will not be redeemed from the second (spiritual) death and cannot dwell in a kingdom of glory (D&C 88:32, 35).”

    None of them is lost but the son of perdition, John 17:12.

    Unfortunately, the Holy Bible is myth, plagiarized myth from other parts of the world cobbled together into a supermyth. The Hindu Deity Brahma married to his sister SARAswati becomes aBRAHAM married to his sister SARA. Neither couple existed, both are myth, and the Hebrew Bible is plagarized from older myth. That is something to consider, since the followers of Abraham believe they are titled to Palestine. But they are not, they are deluded by myth. Since Abraham never existed, everything that follows in that story is fiction. And I am sorry if any of you believe otherwise, you are wrong. No Abraham means no Covenant and the fake Jew converts from Eastern Europe need to pack up and get the hell out of Palestine. That, ultimately, is why Israel will fail. Israel is built on the quicksands of bad myth and worse theology.

    Just so everyone understands, no God told no Abraham to kill his eldest son Isaac. That is only a story, and a very bad one, which establishes the Abrahamic faiths. If God told you to go kill your oldest son, which you love dearly, what would you do? Obey this mad power hungry demon posing as God or tell this God to go fuck off? Only a lunatic would act on the voice in his head, and go up a mountain to burn his son after killing him. That story, by the way, is what gets normal loving humans to send their sons off to wars. Jew wars of conquest, enabled by bad myth.

    The cult of ultimate evil established with Abraham – Isaac story

    Kevin Barrett: I think it’s a test from God. Ultimately, that’s what we are. That’s what life really is about. It’s not so much about what we can do in this world, but it’s how we react to the challenges of this world as we go to the next world. And people who risk their lives and ultimately even those who give up their lives standing up for what’s right, whether it’s peacefully or otherwise, I believe have passed that test. So God bless the President Ibrahim Raisi and Hossein Amirabdollahian and the others who were on that helicopter. They’re martyrs in paradise now, as will be everybody else who stands up to the Zionist shayateen.

    Unfortunately, this rational discussion on real politik becomes religious fantasy. There is absolutely no evidence anyone can survive death or go on to heaven, paradise, or reincarnation. Humans, with their big brains and self awareness, have invented theologies that we survive death. In order to sell this, the priest had to invent the soul, because as anyone can see, when you are dead you are dead. The priest claims the invisible soul survives the bodies death, the priest says this soul goes on for more events like judgment or afterlife – thus you must obey the priest or else God will get you. Obviously, the soul is a ruse – invented to control the rabble with fear.

    Zeitgeist – The Movie | Documentary | Sociological | History | Christianity
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVYlxHteUMs
    Video Link

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @Unbornawakened
    @Yukon Jack

    Netanyahu is a useful idiot. If he is killed someone smarter might take over. It is better to let him stay alive.

    Assuming it was Israel, I am ready to bet Iran will still come up with weather and mechanical failure as the cause presented to the public. Because of Western media spins and distrust in Iran, no one will believe Iran if it claims Israel was behind it, and Israel will claim Iran fabricated the evidence. If Iran attacks Israel, with the world denying it proof, it would be seen as aggressor. Admitting to Israel killing not just generals but its top leaders would also be extremely humiliating for Iran's leaders.

    Instead, Iran will just escalate arms shipments to Hezbollah and Houthis, and take covert action inside Israel if possible. It is better to let Israel self-destruct and the Arab fighters finish it off.

    At the same time, as I had said before, Israel will keep testing Iran by carrying out covert action with plausible deniability, so it does not face direct Iranian response.

    Therefore, the April 14 response by Iran could be said to have had no deterrence at all on Israel. Israel will simply no longer leave traces and never take credit but continue to escalate.

    Israel is in effect saying: if you think the consulate attack was something, when we kill your president, and then your supreme leader, and then .... you will know we own you.

    And it does seem Israel owns a lot of people in Iran, simply because there is huge discontent inside the country due to hard hitting repression decade after decade. A lot of internal enemies want nothing more than get back at the leaders of Iran, and will gladly take action on behalf of Israel whenever asked.

    Iran may seem like the winner in the short term but internal tensions will eventually lead to an uprising sooner or later, and all the achievements will be lost again. This has happened before in history. The fact that Mongols and Arabs destroyed it at the peak of its power was due to the leaders repressing their own people to such an extent that they came to welcome invaders, and regretted it later very very much.

    If the kind of incompetent and foolish leaders running Iran, who are undermining the country from within, keep staying in power Israel will eventually come out as the winner, because the Arabs are nothing without Iran.

    I hope the military leaders overthrow the corrupt mullahs and start to effect major change to save the country.

    Replies: @Sarita, @Yukon Jack

    , @Obergefreiter
    @Yukon Jack

    but what about reincarnation? Why can't I come back as a furry friend?

    , @annamaria
    @Yukon Jack

    The Polish mongrel bibi is actually a Mileikowsky. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzion_Netanyahu

    Why does he always look somewhat indecent, rather pornographic? No wonder his son is openly into whores.
    https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/09/middleeast/israel-netanyahu-son-strip-club-recording-intl/index.html


    In the tape, Yair Netanyahu can be heard demanding money from Sri, the son of an Israeli gas tycoon.
    “You are crying over 400 shekels,” Yair taunts Ori. “My father sorted your father out with 20 billion dollars and you are crying over 400 shekels?” he adds, laughing. The 400 shekels was “for the whore,” Yair says.
     
    https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/north-africa-west-asia/yair-netanyahu-scandalous-man/

    It should be considered that today Bibi and his family members particularly his wife, Sara, and his son, Yair, are greedily eyeing the available resources of power to fulfill their desires and they cannot neglect their personal, financial and political interests.
     
    , @annamaria
    @Yukon Jack

    The Polish mongrel bibi is actually a Mileikowsky. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzion_Netanyahu

    Why does he always look somewhat indecent, rather pornographic? No wonder his son is openly into whores. https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/09/middleeast/israel-netanyahu-son-strip-club-recording-intl/index.html


    In the tape, Yair Netanyahu can be heard demanding money from Ori, the son of an Israeli gas tycoon.
    “You are crying over 400 shekels,” Yair taunts Ori. “My father sorted your father out with 20 billion dollars and you are crying over 400 shekels?” he adds, laughing. The 400 shekels was “for the whore,” Yair says.
     
    https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/north-africa-west-asia/yair-netanyahu-scandalous-man/

    It should be considered that today Bibi and his family members particularly his wife, Sara, and his son, Yair, are greedily eyeing the available resources of power to fulfill their desires and they cannot neglect their personal, financial and political interests.
     
    And this description completes the moral portrait of the jewish butcher of Gaza.
  • @Fin of a cobra

    Kevin Barrett: Well, they’re extremely desperate right now. ... They need to turn this into World War III. They need to drag the U.S. into their war against Iran.
     
    Are "they" really desperate? Or was this the plan all along? And who are "they"? Barrett thinks Israel needs to "drag the US into their war against Iran". This sets up a dichotomy between the US and Israel that doesn't exist: it's USrael, a single entity run by The Jews. "They" = The Jews. And this situation sets up a win-win scenario for The Jews: they want WWIII and they will get WWIII. This plan was concocted in the pits of hell (the Jewish mind) a long time ago: "We must compel the governments of the goyim to take action in the direction favoured by our widely conceived plan, already approaching the desired consummation". And what was this plan? Here, the Protocols spell it out again:

    We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbours of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbours should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.
     
    Does a fanatical psychopathic people that has been planning for "universal war" for well over a hundred years seem "desperate" to you? No! When you are on the verge of consuming your "widely conceived plan" you are NOT desperate: you are jubilant. You're laughing and cheering all the way to the bank. The Jews are "uniquely evil", as they so helpfully told us themselves, by way of "projection": accuse them of being who you are. To conceive of Jewish Evil, you must think in terms of evil on top of evil on top of evil: evil to the nth power, if you will. So The Jews are already licking their chops as they think what the consequences of their assassination of Iran's president will bring:

    1) Starting WWIII (or a "universal war", as foreseen in the Protocols);
    2) Killing millions of goys;
    3) Enriching the Jews (military complex, shorting the right markets, etc.);
    4) Crushing hated enemies (Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, etc.);
    5) Creating "End Times"-level havoc and destruction;
    6) Speeding up the arrival of their Messiah;
    7) Installing Pax Judaica;
    8) Repairing the world (tikkun olam).

    All The Jews see are beautiful consequences for The Jews. So no, The Jews are not "desperate". They are just putting the final stages of their plan conceived long ago into action. All they can see is a win-win scenario for the Jewish people. The Jews are elated.

    https://twitter.com/JonLemire/status/1792646991316430949

    Replies: @ariadna, @Odd Rabbit

    “When you are on the verge of consuming your “widely conceived plan” you are NOT desperate: you are jubilant. You’re laughing and cheering all the way to the bank.”

    Like Churchill in this excerpt from the link:
    —This is strikingly reminiscent of Winston Churchill. When war with Germany nearly came in the summer of 1911, Edward Grey, the Foreign Secretary, was impressed that while most ministers were away from Westminster, Churchill, “…not tied to London by official work, kept me company for love of the crisis. … his high-mettled spirit was exhilarated by the air of crisis and high events.”[9] According to Roy Jenkins, in 1914, “Amid the gathering storm, Churchill was a consistent force for intervention and ultimately for war.”[10]
    https://www.unz.com/article/beaconsfield-revisited/

    • Replies: @Odd Rabbit
    @Odd Rabbit

    Addendum to previous comment
    More from the same link:

    ...Disraeli was excited at the prospect of war. After he gained the upper hand in the Cabinet, “Derby found Disraeli ‘excited and inclined to swagger’, when he saw him on 11 February [1878]; he was ‘saying war was unavoidable’ and that although it would last ‘three years it would be a glorious and successful war for England’.
    Derby was ‘disgusted with his reckless way of talking, and evident enjoyment of an exciting episode in history, with which his name was to be joined’; this was the antithesis of Conservative statesmanship.”[8]. ...This is strikingly reminiscent of Winston Churchill. When war with Germany nearly came in the summer of 1911, Edward Grey, the Foreign Secretary, was impressed ....

  • Kevin Barrett: Well, they’re extremely desperate right now. … They need to turn this into World War III. They need to drag the U.S. into their war against Iran.

    Are “they” really desperate? Or was this the plan all along? And who are “they”? Barrett thinks Israel needs to “drag the US into their war against Iran”. This sets up a dichotomy between the US and Israel that doesn’t exist: it’s USrael, a single entity run by The Jews. “They” = The Jews. And this situation sets up a win-win scenario for The Jews: they want WWIII and they will get WWIII. This plan was concocted in the pits of hell (the Jewish mind) a long time ago: “We must compel the governments of the goyim to take action in the direction favoured by our widely conceived plan, already approaching the desired consummation”. And what was this plan? Here, the Protocols spell it out again:

    We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbours of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbours should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.

    Does a fanatical psychopathic people that has been planning for “universal war” for well over a hundred years seem “desperate” to you? No! When you are on the verge of consuming your “widely conceived plan” you are NOT desperate: you are jubilant. You’re laughing and cheering all the way to the bank. The Jews are “uniquely evil”, as they so helpfully told us themselves, by way of “projection”: accuse them of being who you are. To conceive of Jewish Evil, you must think in terms of evil on top of evil on top of evil: evil to the nth power, if you will. So The Jews are already licking their chops as they think what the consequences of their assassination of Iran’s president will bring:

    1) Starting WWIII (or a “universal war”, as foreseen in the Protocols);
    2) Killing millions of goys;
    3) Enriching the Jews (military complex, shorting the right markets, etc.);
    4) Crushing hated enemies (Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, etc.);
    5) Creating “End Times”-level havoc and destruction;
    6) Speeding up the arrival of their Messiah;
    7) Installing Pax Judaica;
    8) Repairing the world (tikkun olam).

    All The Jews see are beautiful consequences for The Jews. So no, The Jews are not “desperate”. They are just putting the final stages of their plan conceived long ago into action. All they can see is a win-win scenario for the Jewish people. The Jews are elated.

    https://twitter.com/JonLemire/status/1792646991316430949

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @ariadna
    @Fin of a cobra

    OK, maybe not desperate but would you concede rabidly frustrated?
    After all the plan has been delayed: the five countries in 7 years plan should have been accomplished years ago and the #1 enemy, Iran, is still standing, Assad is still in power in Syria, Iraq is far from "pacified," out-of-nowhere 'subhuman's in Yemen have closed the Red Sea for kosher traffic, the other "subhumans" in Lebanon have caused the squattlements on the coast to be evacuated and the squatters to be housed farther inland at considerable cost to Israel, i.e., the American taxpayers. Israelis previously engaged in productive work (that which did not involve organ trafficking, pornography, etc) have been called to arms thereby hurting economy. Plus the whole world --anti-semites, naturally-- dissing them.
    They are not just seriously frustrated but stunned by incomprehension of what the hell happened to them out of the blue:
    Why after 75 years of Israel being Israel (ethnic cleansing, "mowing the lawn," unceasing murders of Palestinians, imprisoning and toetuing thousands of them, including children, in "preventive arrests" for years) all along being lauded, and protected and aided militarily diplomatically and mediatically, nearly universally recognized as "eternal victims" who can do no wrong, all of a sudden they are the repugnant pariah! Why is ethnic cleansing in installments and periodic massacres of hundreds at a time acceptable while a more resolute , accelerated pace of the same is not?!

    , @Odd Rabbit
    @Fin of a cobra

    "When you are on the verge of consuming your “widely conceived plan” you are NOT desperate: you are jubilant. You’re laughing and cheering all the way to the bank."

    Like Churchill in this excerpt from the link:
    ---This is strikingly reminiscent of Winston Churchill. When war with Germany nearly came in the summer of 1911, Edward Grey, the Foreign Secretary, was impressed that while most ministers were away from Westminster, Churchill, “…not tied to London by official work, kept me company for love of the crisis. … his high-mettled spirit was exhilarated by the air of crisis and high events.”[9] According to Roy Jenkins, in 1914, “Amid the gathering storm, Churchill was a consistent force for intervention and ultimately for war.”[10]
    https://www.unz.com/article/beaconsfield-revisited/

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

  • In his book The New Ecological Order, philosopher Luc Ferry, the former French Minister of Education (2002-2003), shocked animal protectors, whom we shall henceforth call “animalists,” the counterpart of “humanists” for humans.[1] In a chapter of his book entitled “Nazi ecology: the legislation of November 1933, July 1934, and June 1935,” Ferry had the misfortune...
  • Another sad story:

    Revisiting the ‘Good War’s’ Aftermath –Emerging Truth in an Ocean of Myth

    Review of After the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation, by Giles MacDonogh (Basic Books, 2007)

    Reviewed by Dwight D. Murphey
    Excerpt…
    Those who honestly chronicle human events, present or past, are a rare and honorable breed. We should certainly ennoble them within the pantheon of our earthly gods. As we do so, we will no doubt include those who, not out of alienation against the West or the United States or its people but out of a thirst for truth, are bringing to light the awful events that followed in the wake of World War II (as well as the enormities that were committed as part of the way in which the war was fought against civilian populations, although that is a subject we won’t be exploring here)
    https://ihr.org/other/MurpheyAfterthereich

  • The American Right talks about power, realism, and human nature. It acts politically like a naïve child. The American Left talks about equality, empathy, and compassion. It acts politically like a single-minded tribalist. There are many reasons for this, but part is ideological. In one of his most overlooked and yet important articles, “The Other...
  • Biological imperatives are the needs of living organisms required to perpetuate their existence: to survive. Include the following hierarchy of logical imperatives for a living organism: survival, territorialism, competition, reproduction, quality of life-seeking, and group forming. Living organisms that do not attempt to follow or do not succeed in satisfying these imperatives are described as maladaptive; those that do are adaptive

    Dr. Freud here. I am a psychodynamic theoretician. I have a lot of company. That is, we believe that our conscious, rational, thinking does not constitute the whole of our mental life. There exists an unconscious slice, and it is a heckuva big slice. It is “ the biological imperative,” and the components are summarized in the quote above. The essay and the book apparently disagree with this or ignore it. Big mistake, because society has crossed-over into the biological-imperative. Most people are now unwittingly like bacteria in a petri dish, irresistibly compelled to increase their territory and friend group; nothing else matters as much.

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
  • KenH says:

    The book isn’t worth reading if it doesn’t mention Jewish power. The entertainment industry controls the culture and who largely controls that? The media shapes peoples view of the world and current events. Who controls the media? It isn’t the Armenians.

    The ADL is a major linchpin in the post 2016 censorship regime. It is they who are purging their goy enemies from the world wide web and social media.

    Jews exercise a lot of power inside Google. Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page are Jewish. Marc Zuckerberg owns one of the largest social media platforms in Facebook who regular engages in censorship of rightists and conservatives while promoting leftists and left wing causes.

    Jews are vastly overrepresented at Harvard and the rest of the Ivy league while whites are underrepresented.

    Jews provide most of the funding for the Democrats and increasingly for the GOP as well. That money comes with strings attached.

    The increasingly totalitarian state that whites languish under did not come into being by accident or because journos and other opinion shapers throughout the establishment inexplicably believe the same things and have the same agenda.

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @BertB
    @KenH

    "The book isn’t worth reading if it doesn’t mention Jewish power"

    Do you realize the catch-22 you just created?

    * People like you won't consider reading anything if it does NOT take the J issue into account
    * Most people won't consider reading anything if it DOES take the J issue into account

    Please realize:
    1. The J issue is DESIGN level. You get there once you start looking at representation, ask 'cui bono', do system analysis, or whatever your favorite path is
    2. The book strictly stays on the IMPLEMENTATION level

    Very few people, if any, arrive directly at the design level. They HAVE TO pass the implementation level first. You need to understand what is actually going on before you can start discussing whether some entity put it in place, and even actively pushes it. This is the hard part; most people poop their pants before even considering entering this level.

    Yet that is what you REQUIRE.

    Consider not doing that, push people to study implementation and then use some subtle method to have them consider the design issue.

    Replies: @Roger

    , @Godly8
    @KenH

    Yes every article should just be "It's the jews" over and over again.
    It's like a magical mantra. Look into the mirror and repeat "It's the jews" 3 times and then everything will be fixed.

  • I. Genocide Denial Law as Applied Only to One People II. The “Noahide Law” Deception and Talmudic Exceptionalism III. The Antisemitism Awareness Act: The Beginning of the End for the First Amendment www.RevisionistHistory.org I . Genocide Denial Law as Applied Only to One People "The Holocaust falls into that unique category of criminal malevolence whose...
  • @Obergefreiter
    The way Hoffman jumps around makes it difficult to determine when his thoughts end and when those of the Ritual Child Sacrifice denying Jews he is writing about begin.

     

    The American way to defeat the criminal Nazi ideology responsible for the unconscionable mass murder of innocent Jewish people in World War II is t o confront its Hitlerian delusions with fact.

    The extent to which much of the Holocaust denial movement is constructed around the rehabilitation of the reputation of Hitler and Nazism renders it just as problematic as the movements that have arisen to conceal Talmudic and war-Zionist crimes and racism.
     
    I assume the extract above is from Hoffman, and I take umbrage with it.

    Even if the lying Jews could prove that there were gas chambers, which they cannot and refuse to do, there have been so many Jewish lies that have been exposed to render every and all testimony as suspect, if not outright unusable. The massive lie about Katyn comes immediately to mind, but there are so many other truths that have been swept under the Jewish blood covered carpet. Hoffman mentions Dresden, but there are the Rhine Meadows Camps, the Morgentau Plan which was deliberately leaked over a year before the war was over in order to increase the magnitude if the bloodshed, the Hooten Plan, and there is even Kaufmann's book "Germany Must Perish" that came out before the US even entered the war.

    Then of course there is the Nuremberg Tribunals where Germans were tortured to extract confessions and all laws of fairness and justice were suborned in order to support the "holocaust" narrative and force Germany to pay reparations to Israel, a country that didn't even exist until over 3 years after the war.

    So the truth of what happened before and during the war is obstructed by an elaborate forest of lies created by Jews and their lackeys. Hoffman just ignores these facts and accepts the Jewish version of what the NSDAP was about, their morality, what their goals were, their peace efforts, the Jewish declaration of war against Germany in 1933, Versailles, and simply everything to do with them.

    This is shameful. Shame on you Michael Hoffman. You are a Jew Stooge.

    https://imgur.com/1Ov5JpH.png

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @inspector general, @Steve Naidamast

    Thanks.
    I did not read the whole article but if this is true (as you write) that… “Hoffman just ignores these facts and accepts the Jewish version of what the NSDAP was about, their morality, what their goals were, their peace efforts, the Jewish declaration of war against Germany in 1933, Versailles, and simply everything to do with them”,

    so I agree: it’s shameful.

  • Some months ago it occurred to me that the mere fact that the Jewish holocaust story had to be protected by law was in itself sufficient to doubt it. I spent some time studying the standard revisionist works and emerged entirely convinced that it is a hoax.

    I can only recommend to others who may accept the story but who have inquiring minds that they do the same, and be prepared for startling revelations.

    • Agree: BrooLidd, annacat, Miro23
    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit, Adam Birchdale
    • Replies: @Fluesterwitz
    @Wang Shui


    ... the mere fact that the Jewish holocaust story had to be protected by law was in itself sufficient to doubt it.
     
    This.
    , @Kumbaresu
    @Wang Shui

    I was born in the Soviet Union in 1963. My both parents are Jewish. I never heard a word about Jews having been exterminated during the WWII. Nothing from my parents, uncles, aunts, grandparents or any other relatives. I heard that Jews, who stayed at the territories occupied by the German army, were occasionally killed by the local population, who hated them, which is not a big surprise for anybody.

    Only much later, when the iron curtain was lifted, I learned about the Holocaust, which I believed at the time, and it took me a long time to unlearn it. For a long time I was struggling with an apparent contradiction between the behavior of Germans towards Jews during WWI and WWII. During WWI the German army treated their prisoners (Jewish or Gentile) quite humanely. My Jewish grandfather was drafted into the Russian army during WWI in 1915 (he was 19 at the time), and he was imprisoned by the Germans and sent to Germany to work. He was treated well, getting paid for his labor, and even managed to date a German girl. After the war in 1918 he returned to Russia.

    In order to realize that the Holocaust story is bullshit, all you have to do is read the Wikipedia article about gas chambers.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_chamber#:~:text=The%20executioner%20activates%20a%20mechanism,generates%20lethal%20hydrogen%20cyanide%20gas.&text=The%20gas%20is%20visible%20to,deep%20breaths%20to%20speed%20unconsciousness.

    Here is an excerpt:

    The hydrogen cyanide gas chamber is considered to be the most dangerous, most complicated, most time-consuming and most expensive method of administering the death penalty.

    Replies: @Laurence Fryd, @Wang Shui

    , @Face_The_Truth
    @Wang Shui


    Some months ago it occurred to me that the mere fact that the Jewish "Holocaust" story had to be protected by law was in itself sufficient to doubt it.
     
    Scientifically, the fiction of "Jewish Holocaust" cannot be verified; because, murdering 6 million humans within 4 years of time-frame and not leaving any trace of charred partial remnants of 6 million bodies anywhere in European continent is an absurd idea.

    Professor K.S. Lal estimated that, about 60 to 80 million non-Muslims were killed in Indian subcontinent between 1000 A.D. and 1525 A.D. as a result of Islamic invasion(s).

    But, that "60 to 80 million" deaths of non-believers of Islam did not happen in just 4 years!

    World's Jewry claim that, Christian Nazis -- who were actually Jew-worshipers -- murdered exactly 6 million Jews within 4 years and hid their horrible crime(s) without leaving a shred of physical evidence.

    But, world's Jewry can easily get away with lies after lies such as the totally ridiculous fiction of "Holocaust" because of the existence of White greedy Christian bloodsuckers (i.e., Jew-worshipers) in this world.

    White greedy Christian bloodsuckers (i.e., Jew-worshipers) are the real problem on earth for the past 2000 years!

    Same argument can be made about Israeli government's unforgivable crime(s) on September 11, 2001, against American people, which has been extremely well-documented by Dr. Laurent Guyénot.

    The same argument can also be made about Israeli government's unforgivable crime(s) on June 8, 1967, on hundreds of American sailors on an American military vessel, for which Israeli govt. later apologized and paid paltry sum in fine to the American victims.

    So, the bottom-line is Israeli govt. bites the hand that feeds it.
  • Anon[391] • Disclaimer says:

    Observing the erosion of American liberties in order to further fortify and enshrine these little tyrants’ rule over the West, I’m reminded of the Lilliputians in Gulliver’s Travels – hurriedly tying down Gulliver for fear that he might wake up before securely restrained.

    America (and Western Christendom) is Gulliver and the Lilliputians are the Jews. The Jews are terribly frightened that the giant should wake up to the erosion of his liberties – and who’s doing the eroding – before it’s too late for him to escape their fetters. After all, such an awakening has occurred before – most recently seen in Nazi Germany.

    This Act by Congress is just another chain around the goyim’s ankle.

    Our task – those of us who are awake – is to wake up the others before it’s too late.

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit, annacat
    • Replies: @the Man Behind the Curtain
    @Anon


    After all, such an awakening has occurred before – most recently seen in Nazi Germany.
     
    Meh, the end result of 15-20 years of Nazi rule in Germany was more complete control of the country in Jewish hands, though there were fewer Jews. Seen differently it was an exercise in weeding out the competition by certain Jews. Adolf “Deutschland ist Erwach” (Germany is awake) Hitler himself was 1/4 Jewish, after all.

    I thought the Holocaust didn’t happen though?
  • In his book The New Ecological Order, philosopher Luc Ferry, the former French Minister of Education (2002-2003), shocked animal protectors, whom we shall henceforth call “animalists,” the counterpart of “humanists” for humans.[1] In a chapter of his book entitled “Nazi ecology: the legislation of November 1933, July 1934, and June 1935,” Ferry had the misfortune...
  • @Odd Rabbit
    ‘Russia can preserve traditional Western values’ – new defense minister in quotes

    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=287550
    Excerpt:
    RT.com – May 14, 2024
    Andrey Belousov has officially become the ninth minister of defense in the history of modern Russia. He was nominated by President Vladimir Putin on May 12. The decision was unexpected, as he is the first civilian to hold the post. Belousov has never served in law enforcement agencies and spent most of his career working as an academic economist.
    At the same time, Belousov is a longstanding member of the Russian political elite who has held important government positions for the past 20 years. In these years, he has demonstrated his professionalism and his unique vision of Russia’s future.

    On the global world
    ....But the ideology of a multipolar world is about developing a certain self-dependence, similar to [Carl] Jung’s concept of the Self. It is different from the ‘persona’, or ‘mask’ that one wears. All sovereign countries should possess this [concept of the] Self. Countries that are not sovereign, by definition, cannot possess it. I deeply respect countries like Holland, the Netherlands, [but] they do not possess sovereignty.
    ------
    This is very interesting because JUNG who was a famous Swiss psychoanalyst was a member of NASDAP in the beginning and has supported the party but later left it.
    And now Andrey Belousov, the new defense minister of Russia, refers to Jungian psychology as model of a sovereign country.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    I’m surprised to see that nobody is interested about this RT-article.
    Carl Gustav Jung is the top of the analytic psychology and the best and most oriented person in the human psyche and now the Russian politician refers to him when speaking of a sovereign country.
    That’s brilliant.
    For America today Jung seems to be more a problem or better said America a problem to Jung.

  • Globalist Jews and their vassals have a nasty habit of smearing their opponents with accusations of “conspiracy theorists,” implying by this slur that conspiracies exist only in the fertile imagination of their critics, who are commonly portrayed as a bunch of lying crazies. However, according to Harvard University biological anthropology professor Richard Wrangham, If, as...
  • @Anonymous534
    @Tallest Skil

    I'm not a Jew. Just giving some suggestions about the contents of the article. Why are you so butthurt, mate?


    The Protocols, etc. prove you wrong.
     
    You didn't read the article before commenting, did you? Amazing how quick you were to destroy your credibility. The article doesn't mention The Protocols even once. It talks about the Hebrew Bible, the Talmud, Sabbataï Tsevi from the XVIII century and Jacob Frank from XVIII century.

    A plan written down in a book and followed by thousands across centuries is… not a plot?
     
    The definition of a plan is: an orderly or step-by-step conception or proposal for accomplishing an objective, a systematic arrangement of elements or important parts; a configuration or outline. An actual modern Jewish plan to enslave humanity would have to include as a minimum such elements as:
    - Plan for military conquest [where enslavement by other means is not possible]
    - Plan for dispossessing the goyim population of their property
    - Plan for disarming the goyim population
    - Plan for maintaining Jewish control over enslaved population (given that the Jews are outnumbered 500:1, that's no trivial task)
    Where in the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud are such plans (applicable to the realities of the XXI century) laid out? Do the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud talk about Internet censorship and gun control too? Do they talk about how to go about enslaving one and a half billion Chinese in 2024? Where can I find the details of how the Jews are planning to achieve such a feat? Are you saying they had a plan how to do this since the Bronze Age? Are they time travellers?

    The modern plot, institutions, and actors are behaving the way they do because they were raised on the Torah, Talmud, and Shulchan Aruch.
     
    As I said, one should list these institutions and actors and show how are they have a plan to enslave humanity (whether it's because they were raised on the Torah, Talmud, and Shulchan Aruch, or for other reasons is secondary, if you don't even explain which their actions you're talking about), not simply postulate that some unnamed institutions and actors behave in ways as if they are planning to enslave humanity with no further elaboration on what you mean specifically.

    How about the fact that every jew for centuries has directly worked toward this goal, and the complete and utter inversion of all social, political, and economic behavior in the last century has been solely toward its ends?
     
    What an exaggeration. It's enough to provide you a single example of one Jew who did not directly work on this goal to disprove it. Are the Jews some kind of hive mind like the Zerg, every single one of them under direct control by a central mega-brain? I welcome you to explain how a hundred thousand Jewish soldiers in Hitler's army were "directly working toward this goal, and the complete and utter inversion of all social, political, and economic behavior."

    Replies: @SomeDude, @Fin of a cobra, @King Edward I, @King Edward I, @Tallest Skil

    An actual modern Jewish plan to enslave humanity would have to include as a minimum such elements as: – Plan for military conquest

    It would have been easy for Pierre Simon to include this “plan for a military conquest” as part of his article which gives overwhelming evidence pointing to the “Jewish Plot to Enslave Humanity”, because this plan is right out in the open — the Jews don’t even try to hide it. Simon pointed to evidence which is harder to find and has written an excellent article. I’m sure that if you’re being honest, if you’re not a Jew yourself, like you say you’re not, if you’re not a troll, and if you are not enslaved yourself with the Jew mind virus, you will come around to the conclusion that there is indeed, overwhelming evidence for this “Jewish plot”.

    Let’s take just the “plan for military conquest” you so adamantly request. If we just look at the events of the current century, what do we see? 9/11 was followed by the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, the destruction of Lybia, the attempted destruction of Syria, and so on. How are these events linked to a Jewish “plan for military conquest”. Well, like I said, the plan is right out in the open: 9/11 was the “new Pearl Harbor” envisioned in the “Project for the New American Century (PNAC)” and, in its wake, the destruction of “7 countries in 5 years”, as Wesley Clark admitted, all enemies of Israel (The Jews).

    The list of Jews involved in this PNAC “project” (plan) is long: Donald Kagan, William Kristol, John Bolton, Richard Perle, Robert Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, and many others. They are not “neocons” — they’re Jews. The Jews of Kaganism have a death-grip on US foreign and military policy and their plan outlined in PNAC strives for “unquestioned U.S. military preeminence” Here is what the Jew-PNAC document says:

    it is the purpose of this study to outline the large, ‘full-spectrum’ forces that are necessary to conduct the varied tasks demanded by a strategy of American preeminence for today and tomorrow.

    F. William Engdahl, in his book Full Spectrum Dominance, writes about this PNAC plan concocted by Kaganites and their shabbos goys:

    a strategy to enable total control over every nation, every potential competitor on the face of the earth. It was the blueprint for America’s Full Spectrum Dominance, the New American Century of the new millennium.

    “Total control” is just a euphemism for “conquest”. This is what the Jews planned out in the open and are executing at this very moment. And “full spectrum” means not only military conquest, but economic, political, and cultural conquest as well. And this plan for conquest is not limited to certain regions or populations, but encompasses “every nation”: that is, humanity itself. And a conquered people soon lose their freedom and autonomy and become an enslaved people (e.g. Germany and all of the West).

    The “plan for military conquest”, as you requested, is explained above and is part of the evidence that “actual modern Jewish plan to enslave humanity” does indeed exist — and it’s right out in the open (and just imagine what the Jews have planned in their “secret” documents). As was also shown above, this “military” part of the plan spills over onto many other domains as well, to encompass “Full Spectrum Dominance”, as the Jews wrote in their PNAC document. These examples corroborate Simon’s argument positing a “Jewish Plot to Enslave Humanity”.

  • @Odd Rabbit
    @Pierre Simon

    You say
    that you believe religion is just a mask and you have a racial view on the subject.

    I agree 100%.
    There can not be a religion without a man/race, biology and genes which create the human body and the mind/the whole psychic apparatus, the self/ which then creates the religion which is the product of human mind.
    That's why we have different religions depending on the race/biology.
    There can be no religions without the human mind. And no human mind without evolution/biology. When man dies his mind dies and the religions die.
    It's all so simple.
    It's all in the genes which make it possible: different genes, different religions.
    http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/THOC/enigma_code.pdf

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Kali

    As addendum to previous:
    Of course the culture also affects and modifies genes but it’s a slow and long process and finally the culture is the product of the genes because there was no culture before the genes.

    Here is a good article for someone who is interested in the importance of genes.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/05/15/will-post-modernity-be-post-darwinian-a-review-of-the-post-darwinian-zoothe-post-darwinian-zoothe-post-darwinian-zoo/
    Excerpt
    The author uses the example of the near-seamless large-scale assimilation of Germans into American society to segue to the Jewish Question. That question is: What has been and should be the role of Jews in Western civilization? The last 35 pages or so of the book is a survey course on Jews.
    First, in contrast to German-Americans, Jewish-Americans have not, by in large, identified with traditional American culture. Their wealth and organizational acumen have led to an “undue influence on the institutions of public life, at the expense of heritage America.”
    The well-known Jewish financial crimes, the kosher certification racket, and the Sackler family pill mill Purdue Pharma are covered. All this is mediated by the “guilt prescription” of the Holocaust. The book has a quote from former Israeli foreign minister Abba Ebon: “There’s no business like Shoah business.”

  • @Pierre Simon
    @Fin of a cobra

    I'm quite familiar with Youssef Hindi's fantastic books. I read them all and got a lot of invaluable insights from them.

    He has a religious view whereas I have a racial view on the subject, that's where we differ.

    I believe, contrary to Youssef, who is an historian of religion, that religion is just a mask.

    As I said in a previous article, Hitler was well aware of this cryptic Darwinism:


    One of the most ingenious ruses ever devised was to sail the ship of the Jewish state under the flag of religion, and thus secure the tolerance that Aryans are always ready to grant to different religious beliefs. But the Mosaic Law is nothing other than the doctrine of the preservation of the Jewish race [and its progress towards world domination].[16]
     
    https://www.unz.com/article/was-hitler-controlled-opposition/

    Replies: @Fin of a cobra, @James J. O'Meara, @Odd Rabbit

    You say
    that you believe religion is just a mask and you have a racial view on the subject.

    I agree 100%.
    There can not be a religion without a man/race, biology and genes which create the human body and the mind/the whole psychic apparatus, the self/ which then creates the religion which is the product of human mind.
    That’s why we have different religions depending on the race/biology.
    There can be no religions without the human mind. And no human mind without evolution/biology. When man dies his mind dies and the religions die.
    It’s all so simple.
    It’s all in the genes which make it possible: different genes, different religions.
    http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/THOC/enigma_code.pdf

    • Agree: Pierre Simon
    • Replies: @Odd Rabbit
    @Odd Rabbit

    As addendum to previous:
    Of course the culture also affects and modifies genes but it's a slow and long process and finally the culture is the product of the genes because there was no culture before the genes.

    Here is a good article for someone who is interested in the importance of genes.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/05/15/will-post-modernity-be-post-darwinian-a-review-of-the-post-darwinian-zoothe-post-darwinian-zoothe-post-darwinian-zoo/
    Excerpt
    The author uses the example of the near-seamless large-scale assimilation of Germans into American society to segue to the Jewish Question. That question is: What has been and should be the role of Jews in Western civilization? The last 35 pages or so of the book is a survey course on Jews.
    First, in contrast to German-Americans, Jewish-Americans have not, by in large, identified with traditional American culture. Their wealth and organizational acumen have led to an “undue influence on the institutions of public life, at the expense of heritage America.”
    The well-known Jewish financial crimes, the kosher certification racket, and the Sackler family pill mill Purdue Pharma are covered. All this is mediated by the “guilt prescription” of the Holocaust. The book has a quote from former Israeli foreign minister Abba Ebon: “There’s no business like Shoah business.”

    , @Kali
    @Odd Rabbit

    But jews are not a single race, also not a discrete ethnicity and not necessarily religious.

    Jew are Jews because they say they are Jews. About the only thing that unites them (and I use the word 'unites' loosely) is their self identity and their Holocaustian beliefs.

    It's all just pure ego, masquerading as unique, special chosenness, with a messiah complex and a huge helping of fear and paranoia thrown in for good measure.

    Best regards,
    Kali.

  • @Pierre Simon
    @Fin of a cobra

    I'm quite familiar with Youssef Hindi's fantastic books. I read them all and got a lot of invaluable insights from them.

    He has a religious view whereas I have a racial view on the subject, that's where we differ.

    I believe, contrary to Youssef, who is an historian of religion, that religion is just a mask.

    As I said in a previous article, Hitler was well aware of this cryptic Darwinism:


    One of the most ingenious ruses ever devised was to sail the ship of the Jewish state under the flag of religion, and thus secure the tolerance that Aryans are always ready to grant to different religious beliefs. But the Mosaic Law is nothing other than the doctrine of the preservation of the Jewish race [and its progress towards world domination].[16]
     
    https://www.unz.com/article/was-hitler-controlled-opposition/

    Replies: @Fin of a cobra, @James J. O'Meara, @Odd Rabbit

    One of the most ingenious ruses ever devised was to sail the ship of the Jewish state under the flag of religion, and thus secure the tolerance that Aryans are always ready to grant to different religious beliefs. But the Mosaic Law is nothing other than the doctrine of the preservation of the Jewish race [and its progress towards world domination]

    Moustache Man was right. It’s long past time to stop playing the game of “Judaism” being a religion. As Guyenot and his sources have shown, “Judaism” resembles no other religion — because it isn’t one. It’s a blueprint for world domination.

    Are the Jews a race? A religion? An ethnic group? Not any of those. It’s an international organized crime family. So-called “organized crime” in the USA was “organized” by Meyer Lansky, with wops as fronts.

    You might as well talk about “Corleonism”. The Teachings of Don Corleone.

    The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled, was making “Christians Zionists” worship the Jew god. “We’re the real Jews! Our savior will come back, once we build the Jews their temple!”

    PS: Sen. Geary was right.

    • Agree: Dr. Rock, Thomasina
    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit, annamaria
  • @Fin of a cobra
    Congratulations on a great article, Pierre Simon. I especially like your references to Youssef Hindi's L'Occident et l'Islam, which is a great book. I don't think it's been translated to English, which is a shame. Maybe Kevin Barrett could translate it, as he already translated Laurent Guyenot's From Yahweh to Zion -- another great book. Now we are all waiting for a book from you, which from the looks of your articles will be an important addition to those other two.

    Youssef Hindi wrote an article published on the site Strategika a couple of days ago which I think complements your article, though he focuses more on messianic expectations influencing Israel's current policies. Like you, Hindi also references religious texts such as the Torah, Talmud, and Kabalah. Both of you have similar analyses in relation to the ultimate goal of the Jews: global control and domination. Hindi, however, points to Israeli leaders, especially Netanyahu, whose actions are influenced by messianic beliefs. His interests are more geared toward the Middle East, with special attention given to Iran. Here is a brief quote from Hindi's article:

    Zionism and the Destruction of Nations

    The reconquest of the Holy Land and the reconstruction of the Temple of Jerusalem by the Messiah have been awaited by Jews for 2000 years. But since the influence of Lurianism (16th century), Jews have become their own Messiah, tired of waiting for divine intervention and a Redemption that was supposed to result from the piety and repentance of the Jewish people. Since then, the aim has been to fulfill biblical promises autonomously, without the help of the Messiah.
     
    I'll put up a machine translation of the article below the "more" tab for those who are interested in Hindi's work. Here below is a concise table of contents:

    Netanyahu and the Messiah - The Messianic War
    (Netanyahu et le Messie – La guerre messianique)
    Youssef Hindi

    1. Introduction: Eschatology and Geopolitics
    2. Zionism and National Destruction
    3. Netanyahu’s Messianic Policies
    4. Messianic Religious Movement in Israel
    5. War of Gog and Magog
    6. Eschatological Views: Judaism, Christianity, Islam
    7. Messianic Expectations and Geopolitics
    8. Enemies of Israel: Persia, Rome, Ishmael
    9. Conclusion: Messianism and Global Catastrophe

    https://strategika.fr/2024/05/13/netanyahu-et-le-messie-la-guerre-messianique/
     

    Netanyahu and the Messiah - The Messianic War
    Strategika
    Youssef Hindi

    Eschatology and Jewish Messianism are at the Heart of Middle Eastern and Global Geopolitics

    Since Benjamin Netanyahu's statements regarding the fulfillment of "the prophecies of Isaiah"[1] by the State of Israel, the theological-political taboo has been broken. However, understanding the foundation of these messianic hopes is essential.

    Zionism and the Destruction of Nations

    The reconquest of the Holy Land and the reconstruction of the Temple of Jerusalem by the Messiah have been awaited by Jews for 2000 years. But since the influence of Lurianism (16th century), Jews have become their own Messiah, tired of waiting for divine intervention and a Redemption that was supposed to result from the piety and repentance of the Jewish people. Since then, the aim has been to fulfill biblical promises autonomously, without the help of the Messiah.

    The book of the prophet Obadiah (composed of a single chapter of 21 verses), an essentially eschatological text, summarizes the Zionist program for the end times. The Israelites conclude their morning and evening prayers with the last verse of this book.

    “But on Mount Zion (Editor’s Note: where the Temple of Solomon was supposed to be and where the Al-Aqsa Mosque is located today, in Jerusalem) a remnant will survive and it will be holy, and the house of Jacob will possess its inheritance (Editor’s Note: interpreted as the return of the Jews to the Holy Land to possess it). The house of Jacob will be a fire, the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau will be stubble: they will burn it and consume it, and there will be no survivors from the house of Esau.” (Obadiah, 17-18).
     
    Esau is the brother of Jacob, considered by rabbinic tradition as the father of Europe, Rome, and consequently of Christianity.

    And the book of Obadiah closes with this verse present in Jewish morning and evening prayers:

    “Saviors will ascend Mount Zion to judge the mountains of Esau, and the kingdom will be the Lord’s.” (Obadiah, 21).

    The book of Obadiah also promises the destruction of all nations:

    “As the day of the Lord approaches for all nations, as you have done, it will be done to you; your deeds will return upon your head. Yes, as you have drunk on my holy mountain, so all the nations will drink continually; they will drink and drink and be as if they had never been.” (Obadiah, 15-16).
     
    Netanyahu’s Policy: Accelerating the Coming of the Messiah

    On April 14, 2024, as tensions and the risk of war between Israel and Iran reached their peak, Ehud Barak, former Prime Minister of Israel, stated on LCI: “Netanyahu is under the influence of these [messianic] ministers... He is a kind of slave to these slavish ministers. They have enormous influence over him. They shouldn’t have it, and they force him into a binary choice. He can’t accept anything else... These ministers are asking him to trigger an escalation to accelerate the coming of the Messiah.” [2]

    This influence and close relationship between Israeli leaders and the messianic rabbinic world is longstanding. It is notably illustrated by an interview filmed on November 18, 1990, between Benjamin Netanyahu and the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson [3] (1902-1994), one of the spiritual masters of Judaism worldwide and considered potentially the Messiah. Their exchange is enlightening[4]:

    Menachem Mendel Schneerson: “I haven’t seen you in a long time. Blessings and success. Double portion of blessings.”
    Netanyahu: “I came to ask for your blessing and your help.”
    Menachem Mendel Schneerson: “In all areas?”
    Netanyahu: “In all areas – personal and political.”
    Menachem Mendel Schneerson: “Since our last meeting, many things have progressed. What has not changed, however, is that the Messiah has not yet come; so do something to hasten his coming.”
    Netanyahu: “We are doing, we are doing...”
    Menachem Mendel Schneerson: “Apparently, it is not enough, as several hours have already passed today and he is still not here. But there are still a few hours left before the end of the day[5], so try again today.”
    Netanyahu: “Yes”...

    The religious messianic movement in Israel took a significant step in 2004 and 2005. Seventy-one rabbis proclaimed the creation of the new Sanhedrin, the supreme court of the Jewish people, on October 13, 2004, in Tiberias, which had ceased to exist in 429 AD.

    Reassembled in Jerusalem in January 2005, the judges who comprise the Sanhedrin established a list of problems to solve, some of which include: standardizing the rules of kashrut; determining the exact location of the altar on the Temple Mount; finding the descendants of the tribes of Israel scattered around the world; restoring the Davidic monarchy; establishing a new Jewish ethical code for the army to replace the current one based on secular sources, etc.

    On May 14, 2018, in Jerusalem, Netanyahu participated in the inauguration of the United States embassy and recalled on this occasion the phrase of Colonel Motta Gur, commander of the paratroopers during the conquest of East Jerusalem in June 1967: “The Temple Mount is in our hands!”[6].

    The current Netanyahu government—a coalition between Likud and the ultra-Orthodox Ashkenazim and Sephardim—formed in November 2022, is the most messianic in Israel’s history. The most “radical of the messianic religious Zionists, homophobes, misogynists, and racists have come to power. They are the ideological heirs of rabbis Kook, father and son, Shabtai Ben-Dov, Abraham Stern, and Meir Kahane.”[7]

    Itamar Ben-Gvir, Minister of National Security, was congratulated on the evening of the election by his friends, the rabbis of the Temple Institute, who came to embrace him. As the name suggests, this Institute, created in 1987, is preparing for the reconstruction of the Temple[8]. And it is Ben-Gvir who is responsible for maintaining the status quo on the Al-Aqsa esplanade.

    The messianic fundamentalists, represented in this government, are convinced that the time of Redemption has arrived. 2022 corresponds to the year 5783 of the Hebrew calendar, whose acronym is: “Tav Shin Peh Gimmel,” which they interpret as: “It is the year of the cow of redemption”[9].

    The Temple Institute organized a ceremony at Ben-Gurion Airport on September 22, 2022, on the occasion of the arrival of five red heifers raised by an evangelist on a ranch in Texas. According to tradition, the tenth red heifer should be the last in the history of humanity and Israel.

    The War of Gog and Magog

    In Jewish tradition, the arrival of the Messiah, the messianic era bringing Redemption (Geulah), is preceded by great catastrophes: the war of Gog and Magog, global upheavals, cataclysms, the fall of humanity to its lowest depths, the disappearance of morality, etc.

    In all apocalyptic traditions, the announcement of the end times is accompanied by catastrophic images in various forms: world wars, revolutions, epidemics, famines, economic disasters, but also apostasies, profanations of God's name, forgetting the Torah, and rejecting all moral order, up to the reversal of the laws of nature[10].

    “It shall come to pass on that day, when Gog comes against the land of Israel, says the Lord God, that my fury shall show in my face. For in my jealousy and in the fire of my wrath have I spoken: Surely in that day there shall be a great shaking in the land of Israel; so that the fishes of the sea, the fowls of the heaven, the beasts of the field, all creeping things that creep upon the earth, and all the men that are upon the face of the earth, shall shake at my presence, and the mountains shall be thrown down, and the steep places shall fall, and every wall shall fall to the ground. And I will call for a sword against him throughout all my mountains, says the Lord God: every man's sword shall be against his brother. And I will plead against him with pestilence and with blood; and I will rain upon him, and upon his bands, and upon the many people that are with him, an overflowing rain, and great hailstones, fire, and brimstone. Thus will I magnify myself, and sanctify myself; and I will be known in the eyes of many nations, and they shall know that I am the Lord.” (Ezekiel 38:18-23)
     
    In the Mishna (oral law recorded in the Talmud), the first canonical codification of Halakha (Jewish law), there are apocalyptic descriptions of the cataclysms of the end times[11]:

    “At the heels of the Messiah [meaning at the time of his coming], arrogance will increase and respect will disappear. Heresy will dominate and there will be no moral reprobation. The synagogue will become a house of prostitution; Galilee will be desolate; the people of the borders will wander from town to town, and no one will have pity on them. The wisdom of the scribes will be despised, and those who avoid sin will be scorned. Truth will be nowhere to be found. Children will shame the elders, and the elders will stand up for the children. 'The son will insult his father, the daughter will rise up against her mother, each one will have their enemies in their own household' (Micah 7:6). The face of this generation will be like the face of a dog [meaning: it will be the reign of cynicism]. Who can we rely on then but our Father in Heaven?” (Mishna, end of Tractate Sota)
     
    Christian and Islamic eschatologies also announce these catastrophes at the end of times, but the major difference with Judaism is that in this religion, there is an apocalyptic movement that aims to provoke these calamitous events to accelerate the coming of the Messiah.

    These apocalyptic times and the catastrophes that accompany them are the necessary passage leading to the messianic era, to Redemption. Early on, within Judaism, the temptation arose to hasten the messianic times by provoking these catastrophic events.

    “The masters of the Talmud also questioned whether it is possible to 'hasten the end,' that is, if through action it is possible to force the coming of the end. This question led to a profound split of opinions concerning messianism. The dream was not always accompanied by the decision to do something to make it come true”[12].
     
    Ultimately, the Talmud decided (in the 3rd century) and forbade hastening the messianic times: “The Israelites are sworn not to rebel against the kingdoms of this world [secular powers], not to 'hasten the end,' not to reveal its mysteries to the nations, and not to rise up from exile as a wall [meaning in great numbers]. But then, why must the King-Messiah come? To gather the exiles of Israel.” (Rabbi Helbo, Midrash on the Song of Songs, Shir HaShirim Rabba II, cf. Ketubot 111a)

    But Redemption and Deliverance are so feverishly awaited by the Jews that the Talmudic prohibition on hastening the coming of the Messiah has been violated multiple times over the centuries and eventually denied. Zionism should be inscribed in this movement aiming to hasten the messianic times since it is the Messiah who was supposed to bring the Jews back to the Holy Land.

    Let's read what the rabbis say about this deliverance. “The Geulah, the Final Redemption, is a deep and serious subject. Just as deep and serious as the laws of Shabbat or Kashrut. Unfortunately, this concept is sometimes perceived as a series of events whose apocalyptic nature might dampen our desire to see this Geulah realized in our days. We will try to establish, through our texts, that we can speak of this Geulah in much more positive and stimulating terms. The war of Gog and Magog is the subject of several chapters of the Bible. In Ezekiel and Zechariah. No date is given, no name is recognizable, of course. Like all prophecies, these are subject to interpretation.

    Thus, many leaders of our people have already stated that the two world wars could already be considered as having fulfilled these prophecies. And that if indeed the Jews were to suffer from it, the Holocaust had already atoned for it. The Talmud also speaks of this war. For example, in the tractate Berakhot[13]. Strangely, there is no talk of massacre. The severity of this event is even relativized: man must worry much more about the education of his children and its consequences than about the war of Gog and Magog.

    Indeed, it is said in the Psalms of David[14]: 'Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain?' This refers to the war of Gog and Magog. Yet, it does not seem to trouble David excessively, as we see in the continuation[15]: 'He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision.' On the other hand, in the next psalm, concerning his rebellious son Absalom, David exclaims 'many are my torments!'

    The moral message the Talmud wants to convey is clear: take care of your children rather than seeking thrills by trying to scare yourself. All this is vain and does not concern the Jews.”[16]

    Gershom Scholem, a historian of Judaism, writes:

    “For the prophets and the masters of the Aggadah [the non-legislative rabbinic teachings], redemption was to occur as a result of a general upheaval, a universal revolution, catastrophes, unheard-of calamities by virtue of which history was to collapse and extinguish. History was considered by them with the most absolute pessimism... To achieve deliverance, it is necessary that the current edifice be demolished to make way for the messianic edifice...”[17]
     
    At the end of times, Scholem explains, there will be a fundamental opposition between "good," represented by Israel, and "evil," embodied by the non-Jewish nations: “In the Apocalypses, it is a matter of two eons, which follow one another and are in an antithetical relationship: the present world and the world to come, the reign of darkness and the reign of light. The national antithesis between Israel and the Nations expands into a cosmic antithesis. The respective realms of holiness and sin, the pure and the impure, life and death, light and darkness, God and the powers hostile to Him, oppose each other. A broad cosmic backdrop serves as the setting for the national eschatological data. It is in this context that the final confrontation between Israel and the Nations must occur.”[18]

    The Reconstruction of Israel

    The reconstruction of Israel, destroyed by the Assyrians before Judah was destroyed by the Babylonians, is central in biblical eschatology. The destruction of the Second Temple was the ultimate trauma that had a lasting effect on messianism: “When the Jews realized that they had permanently lost their national existence after the upheavals that followed the destruction of the Second Temple and the end of the ancient world, they became acutely aware of the cryptic and mysterious nature of the messianic message. Messianism has always been about the restoration of national existence, although it also goes beyond it.”[19]

    From the perspective of messianic Zionism, the return of the Jewish people to the Holy Land is not enough. The realization of Greater Israel and its dominion over the world involves large-scale wars, particularly that of Gog and Magog.

    In the book of the prophet Daniel (who is said to have lived during the Babylonian exile between 588 and 538 BCE), there is a prophecy concerning the four empires that are enemies of the Jewish people. According to this prophecy, all these empires will collapse: the Babylonian Empire, the Median Empire, the Persian Empire, and finally the Roman Empire.

    The great rabbi and Talmudic master, Eliezer ben Hurcanus, who lived in the first century, provided an interpretation of a verse from Genesis in the light of the book of Daniel, drawing his conclusions about Israel's final victory. He enumerates the empires that must fall, the “enemies” of Israel who will be “clothed in shame,” while the diadem will shine on the head of the Jewish Messiah. The fourth and final enemy empire of Israel is none other than Rome, which will be the imperial and religious seat of Christianity to be overthrown[20].

    In Jewish tradition, these empires do not belong to the past; they are archetypes of ontological enemies of the Jewish people. These enemies are perpetually incarnated. This is particularly true for Edom (the nickname of Esau, Jacob's brother) who incarnated in Rome, which became Christian Rome, which became Europe, and by extension the West, which must be destroyed repeatedly. Every incarnation of the ontological enemy must be brought down.

    If the fall of Rome is an important condition for the triumph of Israel according to Jewish eschatology, it is not the only one. The fundamental texts of Judaism also indicate that the destruction of Ishmael (the son of Abraham, the father of the Arabs, and consequently of the Muslims), of Islam, is another condition for the advent of the Messiah[21].

    The same applies to Persia, the ontological enemy of Israel from the perspective of Judaism, which is incarnated today by Iran against whom Netanyahu wants to lead the United States to war. In 2012, Ovadia Yosef (1920-2013), the Chief Rabbi of Israel, called on all Jews to pray for the annihilation of Iran. Leaders of the Ministry of Defense, as well as the President of the National Security Council, Ya'akov Amidror, and the Interior Minister Eli Yishai, visited the Chief Rabbi to persuade him to support a possible Israeli attack on Iran. A week before receiving them, Ovadia Yosef had given a similar speech regarding Iran[22].

    This type of discourse is not limited to the rabbinical world; it is also held in the highest spheres of political Judaism and the State of Israel. To be convinced, one only needs to listen to, for example, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. When he went to Moscow on March 9, 2017, to ask Vladimir Putin to drive Iran out of Syria, he used, as an argument, the story from one of the books of the Hebrew Bible, the Book of Esther.

    "2,500 years ago," Netanyahu told Putin, "there was an attempt in Persia to destroy the Jewish people. This attempt failed and this is what we celebrate through the festival of Purim... Today Iran, the heir of Persia, continues this attempt to destroy the Jewish State. They say it in the clearest way, they write it on their missiles."

    The Jewish festival of Purim celebrates the massacre of 75,000 Persians...

    Vladimir Putin retorted, "Yes, but that was in the 5th century BCE. Today we live in a different world. So let's talk about it."

    Rabbi Daniel Scemama, like many of his coreligionists, interprets current geopolitics in light of the eschatological texts of Judaism. "In the writings of our prophets," he writes, "it is reported that a war will see two peoples, Gog and Magog, clash at the end of time. This event will have repercussions on the land of Israel, although it will not be directly concerned. Three hours of terror are mentioned, after which the Jewish people will emerge enlarged.

    Although there is no clear tradition about these facts, as Maimonides reports, some great Rabbis like the Malbim (1809-1879) have delved into this chaotic war by mentioning a possible confrontation between Islamic countries and the West. A Midrash, written two millennia ago, even names Persia (today's Iran) as one of the protagonists of this war. One cannot help but be struck by the relevance of these teachings in our era, and it is important to be prepared for such upheavals. This is how the Chafetz Chaim, along with his student Rav Chajkin, saw in every significant political event—Balfour Declaration, World War, the potential confrontation between the USSR and the United States—as potentially pre-Messianic events."

    According to a certain interpretation of Jewish eschatology, Russia is among the enemies of Israel, as many Jewish commentators, rabbis, affirm that Gog is Russia.

    The triggering of a war against Iran, which would ultimately lead to a world war pitting the United States against Russia, is precisely the objective of Jewish messianists who seek to lead Humanity towards catastrophe.

    Youssef Hindi
    ---

    1. https://www.lebrief.ma/nous-sommes-le-peuple-de-la-lumiere-eux-sont-celui-des-tenebres-linquietant-discours-de-netanyahu-108664/#:~:text=%C2%ABNous%20r%C3%A9aliserons%20la%20proph%C3%A9tie%20d,son%20adresse%20%C3%A0%20la%20Nation.

    2. https://twitter.com/LCI/status/1779576156557090919

    3. He is the seventh heir of the HaBaD Hasidism dynasty founded in 1797 by Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi.

    4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huq0l64PeO4

    5. "Day" means "short historical sequence," in the sense that the arrival of the Messiah is imminent.

    6. Charles Enderlin, *In the Name of the Temple*, p. 485.

    7. Charles Enderlin, *In the Name of the Temple*, p. 499.

    8. https://pierreantoineplaquevent.substack.com/p/millenarisme-et-violence-israel-et

    9. Charles Enderlin, *In the Name of the Temple*, p. 500.

    10. Synoptic compilation provided on this point by Strack-Billerbeck, *Kommentar zum Neum Testament aus Talmud and Midrasch*, IV, 977-986.

    11. Gershom Scholem, *Jewish Messianism*, Calmann-Lévy, Presses Pocket, 1992, p. 14-15.

    12. G. Scholem, *Jewish Messianism*, pp. 16-17.

    13. Page 7a.

    14. 2, 1.

    15. Verse 4.

    16. Rav Binyamin Saada, "What is the Geula?! The War of Gog and Demagogue", Torah-Box, 23/10/2018. https://www.torah-box.com/etudes-ethique-juive/temps-messianique/la-gueoula-c-est-quoi-la-guerre-de-gog-et-demagogue_13130.html

    17. Gershom Scholem, *Jewish Messianism*, Calmann-Lévy, Presses Pocket, 1992, p. 34.

    18. Gershom Scholem, *Jewish Messianism*, p. 12.

    19. Gershom Scholem, *Jewish Messianism*, p. 12.

    20. Rabbi Eliezer, *The Chapters*, chapter 28, Verdier editions.

    21. On the subject, read: Youssef Hindi, *West and Islam Volume 1: Messianic Sources and Genesis of Zionism*, Sigest, 2015.

    22. Haaretz, "Shas spiritual leader calls on Jews to pray for the annihilation of Iran", 26/08/2012.

    23. http://reseauinternational.net/liran-veut-detruire-letat-juif-dit-netanyahou-cetait-au-ve-siecle-avant-j-c-repond-poutine/

    24. Rav Daniel Scemama, "Weekly editorial - Worse than the War of Gog and Magog", Torah-Box, 16/04/2024. https://www.torah-box.com/news/actualite-juive/l-edito-de-la-semaine-pire-que-la-guerre-de-gog-et-magog_47275.html

    25. "Is the Russia-Ukraine war the final war of Gog or Magog prophesied in the Torah?", Torah Academy, 26/02/2022. https://www.torahacademy.fr/russie-et-ukraine–gog-oumagog-et-machia-h

    Replies: @Pierre Simon

    I’m quite familiar with Youssef Hindi’s fantastic books. I read them all and got a lot of invaluable insights from them.

    He has a religious view whereas I have a racial view on the subject, that’s where we differ.

    I believe, contrary to Youssef, who is an historian of religion, that religion is just a mask.

    As I said in a previous article, Hitler was well aware of this cryptic Darwinism:

    One of the most ingenious ruses ever devised was to sail the ship of the Jewish state under the flag of religion, and thus secure the tolerance that Aryans are always ready to grant to different religious beliefs. But the Mosaic Law is nothing other than the doctrine of the preservation of the Jewish race [and its progress towards world domination].[16]

    https://www.unz.com/article/was-hitler-controlled-opposition/

    • Agree: Odd Rabbit, ariadna, Eric135
    • Thanks: annacat, OrangeSmoke, Dr. Rock, Kali
    • Replies: @Fin of a cobra
    @Pierre Simon

    Thanks for the reply -- I think Youssef is a practicing Muslim and perhaps that has influenced his analyses, much like being a practicing Catholic has influenced E. Michael Jones' writings. But, like you said, even when someone has a different point of view on a subject than our own we can still gather valuable insights from them.

    I had just completed another comment when I saw your reply, so I'll post it here (just constructive criticism -- your article is great!):

    I understand that, even though you quote Kevin MacDonald in your article above, you don't necessarily agree with everything he wrote in CoC. If I read him correctly, Kmac's theory is that Jews don't really need to "plot" or "conspire" to achieve a common goal, since they have a natural tendency toward group cohesion arising from evolutionary and cultural factors. These factors suggest, therefore, that Jews naturally align towards similar goals due to shared interests and strategies -- and not necessarily through coordinated conspiracies. The following quote from the CoC seems to support that view:


    There is no implication here of a unified Jewish “conspiracy” to undermine gentile culture, as portrayed in the notorious Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Since the Enlightenment, Judaism has never been a unified, monolithic movement, and there has clearly been a great deal of disagreement among Jews as to how to protect themselves and attain their interests during this period.
     
    What you are arguing in your article seems to be in direct contradiction to MacDonald's statement above, since what you are proposing is the existence of a Jewish "plot" -- which you equate with "conspiracy". MacDonald, on the contrary, suggests that a Jewish conspiracy doesn't necessarily need to exist in order for Jewish group goals to be achieved. Quoting Kmac's theory of "group evolutionary strategy", therefore, doesn't seem to support your own theory and may even undermine what you are proposing -- that there exists a deliberate and unified Jewish conspiracy to enslave humanity.

    On the other hand, maybe your theory and MacDonald's are not necessarily mutually exclusive? But then you would have to explain WHY they are not contradictory. Maybe you could try to reconcile your theory and MacDonald's in a future article?

    Replies: @Horatio

    , @James J. O'Meara
    @Pierre Simon


    One of the most ingenious ruses ever devised was to sail the ship of the Jewish state under the flag of religion, and thus secure the tolerance that Aryans are always ready to grant to different religious beliefs. But the Mosaic Law is nothing other than the doctrine of the preservation of the Jewish race [and its progress towards world domination]
     
    Moustache Man was right. It's long past time to stop playing the game of "Judaism" being a religion. As Guyenot and his sources have shown, "Judaism" resembles no other religion -- because it isn't one. It's a blueprint for world domination.

    Are the Jews a race? A religion? An ethnic group? Not any of those. It's an international organized crime family. So-called "organized crime" in the USA was "organized" by Meyer Lansky, with wops as fronts.

    You might as well talk about "Corleonism". The Teachings of Don Corleone.

    The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled, was making "Christians Zionists" worship the Jew god. "We're the real Jews! Our savior will come back, once we build the Jews their temple!"

    PS: Sen. Geary was right.

    , @Odd Rabbit
    @Pierre Simon

    You say
    that you believe religion is just a mask and you have a racial view on the subject.

    I agree 100%.
    There can not be a religion without a man/race, biology and genes which create the human body and the mind/the whole psychic apparatus, the self/ which then creates the religion which is the product of human mind.
    That's why we have different religions depending on the race/biology.
    There can be no religions without the human mind. And no human mind without evolution/biology. When man dies his mind dies and the religions die.
    It's all so simple.
    It's all in the genes which make it possible: different genes, different religions.
    http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/THOC/enigma_code.pdf

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Kali

  • In his book The New Ecological Order, philosopher Luc Ferry, the former French Minister of Education (2002-2003), shocked animal protectors, whom we shall henceforth call “animalists,” the counterpart of “humanists” for humans.[1] In a chapter of his book entitled “Nazi ecology: the legislation of November 1933, July 1934, and June 1935,” Ferry had the misfortune...
  • ‘Russia can preserve traditional Western values’ – new defense minister in quotes

    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=287550
    Excerpt:
    RT.com – May 14, 2024
    Andrey Belousov has officially become the ninth minister of defense in the history of modern Russia. He was nominated by President Vladimir Putin on May 12. The decision was unexpected, as he is the first civilian to hold the post. Belousov has never served in law enforcement agencies and spent most of his career working as an academic economist.
    At the same time, Belousov is a longstanding member of the Russian political elite who has held important government positions for the past 20 years. In these years, he has demonstrated his professionalism and his unique vision of Russia’s future.

    On the global world
    ….But the ideology of a multipolar world is about developing a certain self-dependence, similar to [Carl] Jung’s concept of the Self. It is different from the ‘persona’, or ‘mask’ that one wears. All sovereign countries should possess this [concept of the] Self. Countries that are not sovereign, by definition, cannot possess it. I deeply respect countries like Holland, the Netherlands, [but] they do not possess sovereignty.
    ——
    This is very interesting because JUNG who was a famous Swiss psychoanalyst was a member of NASDAP in the beginning and has supported the party but later left it.
    And now Andrey Belousov, the new defense minister of Russia, refers to Jungian psychology as model of a sovereign country.

    • Replies: @Odd Rabbit
    @Odd Rabbit

    I'm surprised to see that nobody is interested about this RT-article.
    Carl Gustav Jung is the top of the analytic psychology and the best and most oriented person in the human psyche and now the Russian politician refers to him when speaking of a sovereign country.
    That's brilliant.
    For America today Jung seems to be more a problem or better said America a problem to Jung.

  • @Fin of a cobra
    @Odd Rabbit

    Thanks yet again, Rabbit! You got me on the track of the Michael Fitzgerald's Hitler-as-Aspie theory and for that I will be eternally grateful. I'm pretty much convinced, even with all the pushback I received from commenters here at TUR for supporting that theory (even from the author of the article above, Pierre Simon -- see his comment above). Nobody really presented any convincing counterarguments, so for now I'll stick with the theory. But all comments are helpful, even when they disagree, because it helps us sharpen our own arguments with solid rebuttals.

    Now, as for Beethoven, it seems you're right again -- he was also an Aspie. I hadn't researched that question specifically, which is another egregious lacuna on my part since Beethoven is my also my favorite composer (like minds like similar things, Rabbit!). Back in college, I struggled for years with the Pathétique Sonata -- it was my crowning achievement on the piano. And one of the most goose-bumpy musical experiences I've had in my life was when I went to listen to the 9th Symphony at Carnegie hall: already near the end of the performance, I'm thinking, "where's the choir?"

    There was no choir on stage. Suddenly, scattered throughout the audience, about a hundred people stand up and start singing the chorus: the Japanese Friends of Beethoven's 9th Society had prepared that surprise for us. The Japanese are fanatics for Beethoven, especially the 9th. When Sony created the CD, they made it tailored to the duration of the 9th, so that it would fit on only one disc. Amazing, huh? Could it be that the Japanese are on the spectrum? If you want to dive into a Japanese autistic mind, read Osamu Dasai's "No Longer Human" -- the second most sold book in Japan ever.

    As for Fitzgerald's analysis of Beethoven-as-Aspie, it seems to be in his book Genesis of Artistic Creativity, but unfortunately I don't have access to it. But here's the blurb:


    From Herman Melville's eccentric breakfast habits and Simone Weil's intense dislike of being touched by other people to Ludwig van Beethoven's inappropriate marriage proposals and Vincent van Gogh's inability to form satisfying relationships with others, the author offers compelling insights into the association between creativity and autism spectrum disorders.
     
    And now it seems you have sent me on another deep rabbit hole, Rabbit -- and you know I love that -- because there seems to have been an intimate connection between Beethoven-as-Aspie and Hitler-as-Aspie, which spread throughout the whole of Germany during Hitler's time. Here is a short quote from the book "Beethoven in the Bunker: Musicians Under the Nazi Regime", by Fred Brouwers:

    To Hitler and his followers, Beethoven was a musical hero. ... Nazis from every sector -- political, economic, military, and cultural -- all suffered from an advanced form of Beethoven mania. No wonder. Like Hitler and the entire Nazi movement, Beethoven stood for struggle and ultimate victory.
     
    Well, since Pierre Simon brilliantly analyzed Hitler's policies towards animal rights, maybe he could now delve into his musical preferences and how that influenced the whole regime. And I'm sure Simon will be a lot more sympathetic to Hitler than the author of that book, who goes on and on about antisemitism and what not, from what I saw in the preview of the book.

    As for Beethoven's take on the Jews, I couldn't find anything. Even the AI was rather unresponsive, and since you asked me to prod it, here is what it said:

    Ludwig van Beethoven, the famous composer, did not leave behind any specific or well-documented remarks about Jewish people that are widely recognized or cited in historical or musicological scholarship. His focus was primarily on music, and while his letters and documents reflect on a wide array of subjects, including his personal struggles, views on art, society, and politics, there are no notable records of his thoughts specifically concerning Jewish individuals or communities.
     
    To get away from Jewish "Full Spectrum Propaganda Dominance", Rabbit, we're gonna have to create our own Jew-aware AI. We can start by feeding it all of the excellent articles on TUR, such as the one above. All the best, Rabbit, my fellow Beethoven fanatic!

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Thank you for everything I can take in from you …cobra –
    and above all for this short quote from the book “Beethoven in the Bunker: Musicians Under the Nazi Regime”, by Fred Brouwers:
    “To Hitler and his followers, Beethoven was a musical hero. … Nazis from every sector — political, economic, military, and cultural — all suffered from an advanced form of Beethoven mania. No wonder. Like Hitler and the entire Nazi movement, Beethoven stood for struggle and ultimate victory.”

    Confronting the “Ugly Sounds” of Corrupt Politicians. Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony. First Performed in Vienna 200 Years Ago
    Intro/excerpt from the link
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/beethovens-9th-symphony-confronting-the-ugly-sounds-of-corrupt-politicians/5833399?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles

    Friends, look around you: The World is in a state of economic and social chaos. Censorship and the suppression of fundamental human rights is ongoing at the level of the entire planet.

    That is why Beethoven’s call: “Friends, get Rid of all those Ugly Sounds” is of utmost significance. It constitutes an Act of Resistance, without which the “Ode to Freedom”, namely “Real Democracy” is an impossibility.

    As long as “totalitarian rule” prevails, whether it is in the 19th Century under The Austrian Empire or Today (2020-2030) under US-NATO and the World Economic Forum, the “Ode to Freedom” cannot under any circumstances become a reality.

    Not surprisingly, the 21st Century Globalists and their intelligence apparatus are emulating the Austrian Empire, with “a spy network” far more sophisticated than that cooked up by Prince Klemens von Metternich.

    In the present context, Beethoven’s “Friends, Get Rid of all those Ugly Sounds” should be understood as An Act of Resistance and Worldwide Solidarity against the prevailing structures of corruption, fraud, social divisiveness and political abuse. As well as a stance to the conduct of genocide against the People of Palestine.

    Friends: What this indelibly requires is the creation of an articulate and cohesive mass movement at the level of the entire planet (nationally and worldwide) which confronts the Deep State Globalist architects of this insidious project: Big Money, Big Pharma, the Information Technology Conglomerates, the Security Apparatus, Intelligence, the Military Industrial Complex, Big Oil an Big Energy, and the Corporate Media.

    While this is no easy task, Let us join hands and restore Schiller and Beethoven‘s “Ode to Freedom”.
    ——-
    This is my favorite
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_No._6_(Beethoven)

    Beethoven was a lover of nature who spent a great deal of his time on walks in the country. He frequently left Vienna to work in rural locations. The composer said that the Sixth Symphony is “more the expression of feeling than painting”,[5] a point underlined by the title of the first movement.

  • @j2
    @Tiptoethrutulips

    " They were stopped in the Middle Ages quite effectively.

    How so?"

    First the most important mechanism: inheritable monarchy. A democracy can be taken over easily. An old fashioned monarchy (more of the absolute type than of a constitutional type) can be taken over by inserting advisors to the king, but this method often fails. Thus, Jews were closed to ghettos, put under restrictions and periodically expelled after the king cancelled debt papers and robbed them. These methods worked to the extent that Jews never were actually in power. These methods are crude. Probably there are more civilized methods, maybe through laws.

    " Anyway, Hitler did not have an answer. He made the situation worse, not better.

    So, “removal first” by policy – no Jews in positions of influence; no control of media; no control of publishing nor academia; no Jewish financial banking/speculative shenanigans; Rothschilds out; assistance to get to Palestine with assets/subsidies, and since Hitler had nothing whatsoever to do with the Balfour Declaration, you can’t fault him for taking advantage of a situation that was already underway – Jews were going to Palestine, one way or another. These efforts proved insufficient, and we all know what then happened."

    The methods were insufficient. It is simply so that if you claim to have an answer and your answer is a bad one, then you did not have an answer. It is useless to argue to somebody pointing out that you did not have an answer by listing what you did and asking what the person would have done in this situation. Because the person who pointed out that this is not an answer need not have an answer. If you claim to have an answer, then think of an answer that does work. Or do not claim to have an answer, wait for somebody else to come up with an answer.

    The situation was difficult as pre-Zionists threatened Europe with Communism unless Jews are given a home land, or so it was understood. But surely there would have been an answer if somebody would have thought about this situation more carefully. There usually are answers. But Hitler was no genius, he did not invent answers to difficult problems. He created a disaster.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @nokangaroos, @Tiptoethrutulips

    “But Hitler was no genius, he did not invent answers to difficult problems. He created a disaster.”

    In a way, yes. He could not understand that the zionists finally had so strong hold on the power in the west. He had a very good plan but it suited not to the zionists and they were not ready to any compromise. So we can not say that Hitler created a disaster.
    In my opinion it was however the zionist-controlled west and the zionist banker mafia that created this disaster for their own NWO-plans.

    • Agree: Lurker
    • Replies: @j2
    @Odd Rabbit

    "In my opinion it was however the zionist-controlled west and the zionist banker mafia that created this disaster for their own NWO-plans."

    They would not think it was any disaster. They wanted small Jews to be persecuted and cleansed by darwinistic selection, and the persecutor would be destroyed and they get the world power as in the Star Prophecy (strange to call the Star Prophecy from c. 500 BC with the name New World Order, I call democracy the new world order as that is what NWO originally meant, the American social order, the Freemason goal, but it has a flaw and can be taken over too easily despite all checks and balances it has). Everything in this plan went rather well as it should have, according to them. For the other side only it was a disaster. But I guess Hitler did make a suicide, so he was only manipulated, not one of them.

  • @Pierre Simon
    @Olivier1973

    According to Jewish journalist Tina Hesman Saey:

    Large-scale genetic studies have shown that today’s diverse Jewish communities have remarkable genetic cohesion. The Jews of Iran, Iraq, Yemen, North Africa, European Ashkenazi and other Semitic groups all originated in the Middle East. A common geographic origin can be observed for all major Jewish groups studied. This genetic research clearly disproved the story of the Khazars: a pre-10th century Turkish-Asian empire that converted en masse to Judaism. The researchers compared the DNA signatures of Ashkenazi Jews with those of people of Turkish descent and found no match. The DNA results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of the European, North African, and Middle Eastern Jewish communities originated from a common ancestral Middle Eastern population, and suggest that most Jewish communities remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the diaspora.[9]

    Tina Hesman Saey, “Tracing Jewish Roots: Genome Study Helps Map Diaspora, Highlights How Heritages Blended,” Science News, June 3, 2010.

    Here are some other references you can look into:

    Mark Weber, “Jews: A Religious Community, a People, or a Race?” The Journal of Historical Review, March-April 2000, vol.-19, No 2, p. 63.

    Jim Goad, “The Ultimate JQ: Religion or Race?” Taki’s Magazine, June 17, 2019.

    Oscar Schwartz, “What Does It Mean to Be Genetically Jewish?” The Guardian, June 13, 2019.

    Eric Striker, “New Documentary Sheds Light on Israel’s Strict Prohibitions on Interracial Marriage,” National Justice, December 9, 2020.

    Susan Abulhawa, “Israel’s ‘Nation-State Law’ Parallels the Nazi Nuremberg Laws,” Al Jazeera, July 26, 2018.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

    A common geographic origin can be observed for all major Jewish groups studied.
    This genetic research clearly disproved the story of the Khazars: a pre-10th century Turkish-Asian empire that converted en masse to Judaism.

    Complete B.S.

    Of course the Jews will try to disprove the Khazarian theory, because to admit it would entail that the Ashke-Nazis have no bloodline connection to Palestine and thus have no claim to this land.
    Malevolent International Jewry have conjured all manner of bogus ‘studies’, employing compromised ‘experts’ to smear the Khazarian theory.
    Needless to say, these ZOG funded studies are all worthless.

    UR readers need only click on the link below for the facts:

    [MORE]

    https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/5/1/61/728117?login=false

    Some excerpts from the article are featured below:

    The results of all PC analyses …. show that over 70% of European Jews and almost all Eastern European Jews cluster with Georgian, Armenian, and Azerbaijani Jews within the Caucasus rim.
    Approximately 15% of Central European Jews cluster with Druze and the rest cluster with Cypriots.

    Strong evidence for the Khazarian hypothesis is the clustering of European Jews with the populations that reside on opposite ends of ancient Khazaria: Armenians, Georgians, and Azerbaijani Jews (fig. 1).
    Because Caucasus populations remained relatively isolated in the Caucasus region and because there are no records of Caucasus populations mass-migrating to Eastern and Central Europe prior to the fall of Khazaria (Balanovsky et al. 2011), these findings imply a shared origin for European Jews and Caucasus populations.

    Our findings thus reject the Rhineland hypothesis and uphold the thesis that Eastern European Jews are Judeo–Khazars in origin.
    Consequently, we can conclude that the conceptualisation of European Jews as a “population isolate,” which is derived from the Rhineland hypothesis, is incorrect and most likely reflects sampling bias in the lack of Caucasus non-Jewish populations in comparative analyses.

    The most parsimonious explanation for our findings is that Eastern European Jews are of Judeo–Khazarian ancestry forged over many centuries in the Caucasus.

    Jewish presence in the Caucasus and later Khazaria was recorded as early as the late centuries BCE and reinforced due to the increase in trade along the Silk Road (fig. 1), the decline of Judah (1st–7th centuries), and the uprise of Christianity and Islam (Polak 1951).
    Greco–Roman and Mesopotamian Jews gravitating toward Khazaria were also common in the early centuries and their migrations were intensified following the Khazars’ conversion to Judaism (Polak 1951; Brook 2006; Sand 2009).
    The eastward male-driven migrations (fig. 7) from Europe to Khazaria solidified the exotic Southern European ancestry in the Khazarian gene pool (fig. 5), and increased the genetic heterogeneity of the Judeo–Khazars. The religious conversion of the Khazars encompassed most of the empire’s citizens and subordinate tribes and lasted for the next 400 years (Polak 1951; Baron 1993) until the invasion of the Mongols (Polak 1951; Dinur 1961; Brook 2006).
    At the final collapse of their empire (13th century), many of the Judeo–Khazars fled to Eastern Europe and later migrated to Central Europe and admixed with the neighboring populations.

    Conclusions

    We compared two genetic models for European Jewish ancestry depicting a mixed Khazarian–European–Middle Eastern and sole Middle Eastern origins. Contemporary populations were used as surrogates to the ancient Khazars and Judeans, and their relatedness to European Jews was compared over a comprehensive set of genetic analyses.
    Our findings support the Khazarian hypothesis depicting a large Near Eastern–Caucasus ancestry along with Southern European, Middle Eastern, and Eastern European ancestries, in agreement with recent studies and oral and written traditions.
    We conclude that the genome of European Jews is a tapestry of ancient populations including Judaized Khazars, Greco–Roman Jews, Mesopotamian Jews, and Judeans and that their population structure was formed in the Caucasus …. .

    Summary: That tiny subset of Jewry that have lived continuously in the Middle East (ie: those Jews still living in Iran, Jews that lived up until the second half of the 20th century in moderate numbers in Egypt/Lebanon/Syria/Iraq etc), can claim to have some bloodline relationship to the Jews of biblical times.

    But Ashkenazi Jews (ie: those Jews that represent the core of ZOG, those Jews that have brought so much misery and despair to the world), these depraved misfits are most assuredly IMPOSTORS.
    They are descended from Khazars. No ifs and buts about it.

    • Agree: Olivier1973, xcd
    • Thanks: John Wear, Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @Pierre Simon
    @Truth Vigilante

    Eran Elhaik is a very controversial scientist. As I said in another comment above, such a view from one scientist doesn’t mean it’s true, many scientists have debunked his work, so let’s wait and see what happens in the future.

    https://forward.com/israel/175912/jews-a-race-genetic-theory-comes-under-fierce-atta/

    It’s one of the consequences of the ongoing conflict between Israel and its neighbors that the origins of the “Jewish people” periodically surfaces as an issue of great controversy. It’s particularly troublesome when a scientist—in this case, an Israeli molecular geneticist whose motivations appear more personal and ideological than scientific—stokes the contretemps.
     

    https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2013/05/13/jewish-researcher-attacks-dna-evidence-linking-jews-to-israel/
  • @j2
    @c matt

    " Hitler’s basic mistake was the racial doctrine.

    You completely misunderstand his “doctrine.” His “doctrine” was that races exist, are real, and exhibit real differences. This is irrefutable fact – otherwise, Somalia would look no different than Switzerland. His doctrine was to keep Switzerland Swiss, Somalia Somali, etc. regardless of whether you consider Switzerland or Somalia superior (although I notice migration goes overwhelmingly one way)."

    You are correct that there are human races and they exhibit real differences. These main races have been created by separation over a long time because of geographic distance. You are also correct that Hitler thought that each race should live at the place where it originated, but you do not see what this idea means. According to this idea Middle Eastern should live in the Middle East and not in Europe. And because of this Hitler wanted to move Jews from Europe to the Middle East, Palestine exactly, because Hitler thought that Jews originate in Palestine and should live there. As Jews did not want to move to Palestine, they had to be pushed there. That is what Hitler did and this was exactly what Zionists wanted and the result that Zionists and Hitler wanted is that Jews move to Palestine and create Israel. Today there is Israel and there is an endless conflict between Jews and Palestinians, who actually originally lived in Palestine. Do you now see the error in Hitler's idea?

    When some population from some area has already moved to another area and lived there for hundreds of years, it cannot any more return to the original area without creating a conflict there. Populations in any given area should assimilate. There would be much less problems with e.g. Muslims if they would assimilate and adopt the European culture if they live in an European country. Only culture (like religion, ideology etc.) set barriers to mixing of the populations. With all animals races do not compete when they live in the same area because races, unlike species, can mix genetically. Individuals compete for the best mates. In social animals, like chimps, a small group at times competes against another small group, but there small groups have about 5-10 males only. There are no racial wars.

    Races in animal populations are in separate areas. They do not have racial competition because they do not meet. If several racial groups for some temporary reason are in the same area, they mix genes. If some close by species are in the same area, they cannot effectively mix genetically, they compete and only one of the species prevails. But this is not the case with races. Races can remain separate in the same area only by artificially separating them by human made barriers. For humans these barriers are cultural and religious.

    The wrong idea that racial mixing lowers genetic fitness is not correct, because individuals do compete for mates. Only the best of another racial group will manage to find a mate from the other racial group because individuals from different races do not fit to the image the perfect mate of a given group. Fot a long time two races living in the same area will stay separate because the individuals from both populations will typically prefer members of their own population as mates: they fit to the beauty image that this population has. But given some hundred years the populations mix and the mixture comes only from those individuals who passed as good mates. This is why admixture does not lower the gene pool of either population.

    What Jews should have done in Europe is to admix with the local population and forget their own culture and religion. But Jews did not do that. What Hitler should have understood is that transporting Jews as it was done would not solve the Jewish problem. It would create a bigger problem. Transporting Jews as pro-Zionists, with great hardships and many deaths, would create the myth of the Holocaust to be used against Europeans. Moving Jews to Palestine would create a very long time Israel-Palestine conflict. Finally, Hitler using Germany to push Jews to Palestine would cause German defeat and destruction because Germany was not strong enough to make a war against Western Europe, Soviet Union and the USA. If Hitler so thought, he was a fool. But I doubt he thought so: he transported Jews to East and if it caused Germany to be destroyed, so what. The fittest survive.

    This all comes from the racial idea that each race should live in the place where it originated and if more races happen to live in the same area because of some historical reason, they should not mix: only one race should be left to this area and the other reces should be transported to the areas where they came from. This is wrong. This is a receipt for a catastrophe. This was the receipt for the WWII and the destruction of the loses of that war. This is a very stupid idea. Hitler thought in this way.

    Different races in the same area should be left to be. They will admix in a very long time. Only, one should see that no races try to dominate the other ones. But there is no good reason to import other races to any area.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Interesting thoughts.
    “What Jews should have done in Europe is to admix with the local population and forget their own culture and religion. But Jews did not do that. What Hitler should have understood is that transporting Jews as it was done would not solve the Jewish problem. It would create a bigger problem.”

    It really created a bigger problem.
    But Hitler had very little other chances because the zionists wanted to destroy Germany, take it under their control and not to assimilate and admix even if it had been possible for them. They wanted not to co-operate and declared war and only a small group of non-zionist jews was ready for assimilate add collaborate with Hitler.
    The Weimar Republic was not a sovereign Germany, only a product of zionists who won the ww1 war with US. And if Hitler had not transferred the jews away to Palestine he would had to accept the destruction of Germany what the zionist diaspora wanted and did everything for it.
    In other words accept the situation that exists today when Germany like US is the lackey of Zion.

    • Replies: @j2
    @Odd Rabbit

    "The Weimar Republic was not a sovereign Germany, only a product of zionists who won the ww1 war with US. And if Hitler had not transferred the jews away to Palestine he would had to accept the destruction of Germany what the zionist diaspora wanted and did everything for it.
    In other words accept the situation that exists today when Germany like US is the lackey of Zion."

    I agree. The problem was there before Hitler and Hitler could not solve it in any better way, but the way he tried to solve it was a disaster. The original Jewish problem was that in the European class society with nobles and common folk, Jews in Europe were king's people kept in ghettos or special Jewish streets for getting money to the crown by usury that was forbidden to Christians by the words of Jesus but allowed, indeed recommended, to Jews by the Books of Moses, i.e., by the same Bible that Christians used. When Enlightenment (including Freemasons as the main organizer of coups and revolutions) wanted to remove the nobility and go to the American system (new world order, i.e., democracy), there was no place for a special people of the king. Jews had two choices only: either to assimilate or to leave. Jewish leaders and Jewish Rabbis did not want Jews to assimilate. Therefore they had to leave.

    Jews would have finally assimilated in Europe to the extent that multiple ethnic groups ever assimilate, i.e., the groups do not disappear totally, it does not create one unified population, but that is not necessary. The result of assimilation is that there still will always be pure blooded members of the admixed groups. The populations only assimilate to the extent that there is a genetic continuity created by half-breeds. But that is enough to avoid racial competition and turn it into individual (or family) level competition. People are not identical in any population and there should be individual competition to enable development.

    But this is not what Jewish leaders wanted. Assimilation of Jews is against the spirit of the Old Testament. It is anti-Jewish. It is the ruin of their believe system. It is exactly true that Jews would have used group power in order to take over the countries. But there are ways to stop them. They were stopped in the Middle Ages quite effectively. There probably are more civilized ways to prevent a take over. Only today, if one mentions that for instance several fields of science, the press, the movie industry and so on, are taken over, one gets to be called by names and different debunkers "show" that this is not the case.

    Anyway, Hitler did not have an answer. He made the situation worse, not better.

    Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips

  • @Fin of a cobra

    On a larger scale, this war is much like the story of Antonio Salieri vs Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.
     
    I'm a big fan of the Movie Amadeus directed by Milos Forman and I had never thought of it as an analogy for WWII -- very perceptive, thanks! What is funny is that I asked ChatGPT to make this analogy and it put Germany in Salieri's place and the Allies as Mozart -- which is the exact opposite of what you intended, of course. Then I tried to force the chatbot to make Hitler out as Mozart and Salieri as the Jews, and it just warned me of "hatred fueled by false narratives and misunderstandings, deeply misrepresenting the real historical roles and contributions of the Jewish people."

    I should have expected that reply since the Jews also dominate AI. As you say in your article, the Jews have operated the largest "propaganda operation in the history of the world". I agree. Now, add AI to the mix. Taking a cue from a William Engdahl book, what the Jews have achieved could be called "Full Spectrum Propaganda Dominance". There are very few exceptions, relegated to the outer fringes of the internet (like TUR). This would be a whole other topic to discuss.

    But getting back to the movie Amadeus, what is also interesting to me is the high probability that both Mozart and Hitler were Aspies (Asperger Syndrome or "Autism Spectrum Disorder"). I've argued in favor of Michael Fitzgerald's Hitler-as-Aspie theory in a recent comment on your previous articles (and I know you don't agree with this theory, since you supported another commenter with a counterargument). In one of my comments, I point out how people on the spectrum feel very close to animals, quoting Asperger's expert Tony Attwood: "[Aspies] are sometimes more able to perceive and have compassion for the perspective of animals than humans". In your article, you write that "Hitler’s notorious love of animals was ridiculed". That's doubly Aspie: loving animals and being ridiculed or bullied. Fits perfectly with Fitzpatrick's theory.

    In another comment, I also mentioned the movie Amadeus. Although I wasn't making the same analogy as you do, maybe unconsciously I felt that there was a link between Mozart and Hitler due to their common neurological condition. Here is what the NIH published on their site, which might be described as the Mozart-as-Aspie theory:

    "Did Mozart suffer from Asperger syndrome?" by Michele Raja
    The most reliable biographies of Mozart highlight elements that are compatible with current diagnostic criteria for Asperger syndrome including qualitative impairment in social interaction and stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms. ...difficulty in communicating his emotional state and in inferring the mental state of his interlocutors, motor clumsiness, specific skills and genius, left-handedness, special sense of humour, physical developmental abnormalities, bizarre thinking, overvalued ideas and delusions.
     
    So maybe both Mozart and Hitler were misunderstood Aspie geniuses.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Thanks again …cobra! I see that You are my favorite commenter here… always waiting your deeper comments.

    “So maybe both Mozart and Hitler were misunderstood Aspie geniuses.”

    They were geniuses you should not admire in the modern ‘chatbot-boys’ world. They are bad models for modern man because they have not served the spirit of the holy money.
    Now I would like to see what the “Full Spectrum Propaganda Dominance” chatbot says about Beethoven, my favorite, who also was an ‘Aspi-case’ and an antisemite.
    Perhaps you could help me and ask the chatbot.

    • Replies: @Fin of a cobra
    @Odd Rabbit

    Thanks yet again, Rabbit! You got me on the track of the Michael Fitzgerald's Hitler-as-Aspie theory and for that I will be eternally grateful. I'm pretty much convinced, even with all the pushback I received from commenters here at TUR for supporting that theory (even from the author of the article above, Pierre Simon -- see his comment above). Nobody really presented any convincing counterarguments, so for now I'll stick with the theory. But all comments are helpful, even when they disagree, because it helps us sharpen our own arguments with solid rebuttals.

    Now, as for Beethoven, it seems you're right again -- he was also an Aspie. I hadn't researched that question specifically, which is another egregious lacuna on my part since Beethoven is my also my favorite composer (like minds like similar things, Rabbit!). Back in college, I struggled for years with the Pathétique Sonata -- it was my crowning achievement on the piano. And one of the most goose-bumpy musical experiences I've had in my life was when I went to listen to the 9th Symphony at Carnegie hall: already near the end of the performance, I'm thinking, "where's the choir?"

    There was no choir on stage. Suddenly, scattered throughout the audience, about a hundred people stand up and start singing the chorus: the Japanese Friends of Beethoven's 9th Society had prepared that surprise for us. The Japanese are fanatics for Beethoven, especially the 9th. When Sony created the CD, they made it tailored to the duration of the 9th, so that it would fit on only one disc. Amazing, huh? Could it be that the Japanese are on the spectrum? If you want to dive into a Japanese autistic mind, read Osamu Dasai's "No Longer Human" -- the second most sold book in Japan ever.

    As for Fitzgerald's analysis of Beethoven-as-Aspie, it seems to be in his book Genesis of Artistic Creativity, but unfortunately I don't have access to it. But here's the blurb:


    From Herman Melville's eccentric breakfast habits and Simone Weil's intense dislike of being touched by other people to Ludwig van Beethoven's inappropriate marriage proposals and Vincent van Gogh's inability to form satisfying relationships with others, the author offers compelling insights into the association between creativity and autism spectrum disorders.
     
    And now it seems you have sent me on another deep rabbit hole, Rabbit -- and you know I love that -- because there seems to have been an intimate connection between Beethoven-as-Aspie and Hitler-as-Aspie, which spread throughout the whole of Germany during Hitler's time. Here is a short quote from the book "Beethoven in the Bunker: Musicians Under the Nazi Regime", by Fred Brouwers:

    To Hitler and his followers, Beethoven was a musical hero. ... Nazis from every sector -- political, economic, military, and cultural -- all suffered from an advanced form of Beethoven mania. No wonder. Like Hitler and the entire Nazi movement, Beethoven stood for struggle and ultimate victory.
     
    Well, since Pierre Simon brilliantly analyzed Hitler's policies towards animal rights, maybe he could now delve into his musical preferences and how that influenced the whole regime. And I'm sure Simon will be a lot more sympathetic to Hitler than the author of that book, who goes on and on about antisemitism and what not, from what I saw in the preview of the book.

    As for Beethoven's take on the Jews, I couldn't find anything. Even the AI was rather unresponsive, and since you asked me to prod it, here is what it said:

    Ludwig van Beethoven, the famous composer, did not leave behind any specific or well-documented remarks about Jewish people that are widely recognized or cited in historical or musicological scholarship. His focus was primarily on music, and while his letters and documents reflect on a wide array of subjects, including his personal struggles, views on art, society, and politics, there are no notable records of his thoughts specifically concerning Jewish individuals or communities.
     
    To get away from Jewish "Full Spectrum Propaganda Dominance", Rabbit, we're gonna have to create our own Jew-aware AI. We can start by feeding it all of the excellent articles on TUR, such as the one above. All the best, Rabbit, my fellow Beethoven fanatic!

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

  • @Qwerty123
    @Pierre Simon


    After the war, the Master Race made sure that their alleged god given racial superiority would never again be challenged. With the charter of human rights, the UN, the Nuremberg trials, they poisoned the well of racial consciousness with anti-racism, individualism, liberalism, consumerism, democracy, and the particularly powerful Holocaust venom, which they injected in the minds of every White person on the Globe.

    “What Jews fear more than anything else,” writes author F. Britton in his book Behind Communism, “is a rebirth of race consciousness among the great White majority of the Christian world. They remember that at the very instant that the German people became race-conscious they turned with deadly fury against the Jews.”
    “It is precisely for this reason,” concludes Curse, an anonymous commenter on one of the social medias, “that they have stigmatized racism in our minds, they know it’s the best survival strategy. Their position in our societies is a testament to that.”
     


    Race consciousness is not something an evil idea but very natural and biological expression of individuality, it is found in every society. One can observe it over entire human history in different civilization irrespective of religion, region, culture and geography with its own specific way of manifestation and tone. It is problematic only when Race consciousness turns into Race Pride, which crosses the fence of self confidence and get onto self-obsession and group narcissism, which threatens not only its own well-being and engenders corruption in morals but becomes bereft itself of positive spirit of human productivity.
    The Race Pride also endangers other race groups because of inferiority and meanness that Pride race group associates with other groups, to which naturally, other race groups react in defense of the themselves with different degree of social and political measures.
    I am an Asian and live in Asia and I found Race consciousness everywhere in old poetry, culture and literature, music but do not consider it double standard, bad or threating or even negative. I found this phenomena even in those great personalities who are revered and considered as great moral and religious giants.
    Its modern western knowledge production , with its newer knowledge disciplines specifically social sciences, which completely turned the meaning of Race upside down.


    Q 1.The question then arises why it happened? Why the Race consciousness has been turned into an evil thing?

    Q 2.What causes this 180 degree shift in human perception towards race? What factors drive this shift and who supported this momentous transformation, or west was being turned astray to wrong direction?

    Q 3. 19th century was full of Race consciousness but was it positive or natural expression or crossing into unnatural limits of Race pride?. Read Malthus, Spencer, Darwin, Huxley, Francis Galton (all are British). This British idea of Race travelled to Germany ( Ernst Haeckel, Emil du Bois Reymond to Hitler),ensued hygiene movement ,environmentalism and fascinated many of them among others. From Britain it got across Atlantic towards USA ( Cold Harbor Spring Laboratory, Rockefellers, American Eugenic Society, Margaret Sanger, Population control measures, sterilization all of that.

    Q 4. Emancipation of Jews produced the most hateful narcissist Race pride ideology of Zionism in the very same period of 19th century. Is there any connection between Eugenics or Zionism or not?

    What was it? What exactly was happening in this period of time?
    clarity on above questions and issues are warranted.




    Sharing some references which poses more complexities:

    https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/the-horrifying-american-roots-of-nazi-eugenics

    https://youtu.be/w_5EwYpLD6A?si=Ws916VlADAZRcXkm

    https://youtu.be/7Dyyt2kVOEg?si=9ezKKf1qG07prFOb

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_Darwin_to_Hitler
    https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1403965021/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?ie=UTF8&qid=&sr=

    Replies: @Pierre Simon

    With the advent in the early 20th century of the fraudulent Jewish-led Boasian anthropology, which defined race as a social construct, race realism, Darwinism, and eugenics lost their popularity, except, paradoxically, with the Jews themselves, the very ones who imposed on Whites the values of universalism and race denial for political reasons. In other words, as we shall see further on, Jews are basically using universalism and race denial as a Jewish group evolutionary strategy to dominate the White race and eventually all races, while they themselves remain separate and racially conscious. As evolutionary psychologist Dr. Kevin MacDonald says,

    Jewish ethics is universalist, while at the same time maintaining that Israel must remain separate in order to present a moral beacon to the rest of humanity—a beacon of universalism and ethnic dissolution of non-Jews. One cannot underestimate the importance of the fact that the central pose of post Enlightment Jewish intellectuals is a sense that Judaism represents a moral beacon to the rest of humanity. (1)

    Kevin MACDONALD, Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future, Kindle Direct Publication Edition, 2019, p. 284.

    • Agree: A B Coreopsis
    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @tamberlint
    @Pierre Simon

    Race, as we understand it now, is a social construct. So is gender.

    , @annacat
    @Pierre Simon

    Thank you for an excellent article and well-needed comments, Mr Simon!

    As you probably know, Dr Kevin MacDonald was permanently banned on Twitter once the "free speech lover", Elon Musk, became the platform's owner. This, if anything, shows clearly that censorship is more about who than what is being said, as Dr MacDonald is a gentleman and a person of great knowledge, i.e. so very unlike the many personas that Twitter finds no reason to ban.

  • @Priss Factor
    Nazi hatred of Russians undid them.

    That is the saddest truth of all.

    Replies: @Cloverleaf, @American Citizen, @Redpill Boomer, @Zachary Smith, @Derer, @Anonymous, @Voltaria Voltaire, @Pythas, @marylou, @Boulder, @Fifth_Dim

    Nazi hatred of Russians undid them.

    This should be further qualified, it was a hate of Jewish Bolshevism in Russia.

    • Disagree: Anonymous534
  • Excellent article. Thank you, Mr. Simon.

  • I think the striking events we have witnessed in American society over the last few months---and especially the last few days---are best understood if we consider a shrewd observation widely misattributed to Voltaire: From the years of my childhood I'd always been aware that political activism and protests were a regular feature of college life,...
  • werpor says:
    @michael888
    Excellent article by Ron Unz explaining how we got to the sorry state we are in today.

    Despite a few minor quibbles, I full agree with and endorse his summary.

    Unfortunately many Jews of Conscience will end up suffering due to Israel's atrocities, enabled by Biden and America.

    Replies: @werpor

    “Unfortunately many Jews of Conscience will end up suffering due to Israel’s atrocities, enabled by Biden and America.”

    This, for many Jews, is the terror of the situation. When one is a part of a community, with all the connections that implies — true for any community — these most recent abhorrent revelations are a shock. Most Americans believe all kinds of things proven to be untrue — the average Jew believed the same things; why would they be any different in this regard?

    Baby Boomer Jews watched the same TV programming as children as their non-Jew neighbours. It is certainly the case propaganda is indeed powerfully persuasive. The post WWII narrative was delivered by teachers, their parents, movie newsreels about the war, the NY Times, our politicians, etc.

    And a cast of foreign subversives and propagandists whose aim was to brainwash the entire population! You think I exaggerate — read on.

    When occasionally that narrative was contested most people were unaware that it was. Many things hidden, galvanized many a boomer, when they doubted the veracity of the need to fight in Vietnam. Still most Americans thought it un-American to protest the war. But by 1970 public option had changed.

    Americans were shocked by the revelations — still, few truly understood then, that there was a “Deep State.” After Nixon resigned the Deep State went back underground. Most people never suspected that there were influences they couldn’t even imagine — or that those influences had been potent for decades.

    The overwhelming power of modern propaganda in America after the troops came home, was that the good guys won, the bad guys lost. As a young boy I found war fascinating. It seemed heroic. I read books, comics, magazines, newspapers even the backs of cereal boxes. I built model aircraft. Dozens; theirs and ours!

    Everything I read in the 1950s, or heard, or saw, reenforced my perspective. But gradually, as my reading continued into the 1960s I noticed discordances which led me to begin to ask real questions.

    I am 76. My awakening was a gradual process. I imagined friends and family would be interested in my pronouncements. Well, they most certainly were not. They pointed to the conventional narrative which they explicitly trusted and thought me unconventional and eccentric, whenever I advanced a countervailing narrative. So of course I plowed on in my reading — I wanted to prove them wrong.

    Gradually I realized they knew nothing about money and where it came from, or the consequences of not knowing, and neither did I. It was not taught anywhere. I took some economic courses at university. Despite the charting and the equations and the reiteration of market analysis and the markets response to the Federal Reserve lowering or raising interest rates — the questions bedevilling
    me never came up. I hadn’t then formulated the right question. No question money existed so I never asked where did money came from. I understood the bills were printed and were used to replace the old worn out bills.

    The question took me down a rabbit hole into a rabbit warren — a dark maze — I can tell you. One day I understood! Truly, I thought every economist understood the process. Nope. It took me years to convince myself I understood something about money few people understood including many economists. The Federal Reserve was a private bank. It was not a department of the United States government. It was independent of government. That was a surprise!

    But it was made to appear otherwise. Did the interest rates not reflect government policy? Well sort of. Where did government policy come from? Who decided what those policies should be? Down the rabbit hole I went again. Gad! This was a completely different hole this time. I felt like bloody Alice.

    The rabbits down there were giants I had never imagined. They were sharp in tooth and claw. They were not nice. None of them wore red, white, and blue. Hundreds of them were busy pushing levers — they were in a room with a sign on the door which read: Pulling the Wool Over the Publics Eyes.

    Oy vey! I slapped myself on the forehead. Gadzooks! One rabbit was typing speeches. A sign on his desk said: Political Rhetoric. The desk beside him had a sign too, it read: Truth to Lies.

    Over on a raised platform was very important looking rabbit. His sign was hanging above his head: Interest Rates Settings. He was working on a chart showing interest rate settings for 2084.

    At another desk a rabbit wearing a yarmulke had a sign: Dismantling Christianity. I asked him about that. He said “you know …dismantling Church and state and replacing it with synagogue and state — Israel and the United States.”

    In a side room some women were working on a flag I had never see before: it showed a menorah with labels in raised letters printed on each of the nine candles. China, France, Russia, England and The United States, South America, Africa, India grouped on either side of the middle candle. The middle candle had a small sign hanging around its base — a gold one, labelled Greater Israel.

    I spun around in dismay. It was set up like a war room. The photos on the walls were labelled — Heroes of the Great Dispossession: There they were; FDR, Wilson, Churchill, Balfour, Macron, Trudeau and some others I was familiar with Morgentaler, Rockefeller, Rothschild — then a cluster of lesser know subverters under another sign: Critical Theory; Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Walter Benjamin, Friedrich Pollock, Leo Lowenthal, Eric Fromm, Jürgen Habermas, Richard Bernstein, Andrew Feenberg, Albrecht Wellmer, Klaus Offe, Josef Früchtl, Hauke Brunkhurst, Klaus Günther, Axel Honneth, Alessandro Ferrara, Cristina Lafront, Rainer Forst — all good old American names?

    Suddenly I knew! I fled up out of the warren into the fresh air. I was trembling. I turned one more time towards the hidden entrance to the warren. There was a sign I hadn’t notice before, faded with raised blue letters on a red background: The Terror of the Situation.

    • Replies: @HdC
    @werpor

    Did you ever figure out where the money, that is put into circulation by the Federal Reserve Bank, comes from?

    It is created "out of thin air" as testified by a banker from said institution. That is Finance Capitalism and is the bane for all that work for their money because it can be created without limit thus causing inflation.

    What is needed is Labour Capitalism whereby money is put into circulation based on the amount of goods and services -labour- performed.

    Labour Capitalism was implemented with great success. So much so that financial capitalists and communists made common cause to destroy this new, effective, and fair to workers, system.

    That was the reason for WWII.

    Replies: @Bart Marlin, @werpor, @Chris Moore

  • @Odd Rabbit
    @Fin of a cobra

    ".. commenters here (me included) may be suffering from is “This Time is Different Syndrome”. That is, our hope is so great that we may finally be reaching a tipping point in public awareness of Jewish Power that somehow things will begin to change. But where is the evidence of this change.."

    I have suffered long from that syndrome... and lost all hope. Why?
    Ron has the answer in the article:
    ---[Consider the fascinating perspective of the recently deceased Boris Berezovsky, once the most powerful of the Russian oligarchs and the puppet master behind President Boris Yeltsin during the late 1990s. After looting billions in national wealth and elevating Vladimir Putin to the presidency, he overreached himself and eventually went into exile.
    According to the New York Times, he had planned to transform Russia into a fake two-party state—one social-democratic and one neoconservative—in which heated public battles would be fought on divisive, symbolic issues, while behind the scenes both parties would actually be controlled by the same ruling elites. With the citizenry thus permanently divided and popular dissatisfaction safely channeled into meaningless dead-ends,
    Russia’s rulers could maintain unlimited wealth and power for themselves, with little threat to their reign. Given America’s history over the last couple of decades, perhaps we can guess where Berezovsky got his idea for such a clever political scheme.]

    In this kind of democracy it's only possible to live in “This Time is Different Syndrome”.
    The west has no hope. The money only talks. China and BRICS-countries have not this kind of democracy and they are not destroying themselves. They have better future.

    Excerpts from Putin's inaugural speech
    The interests and security of the Russian people are paramount.
    Russia's central goal is to save people and preserve centuries-old values and traditions.
    We will not refuse dialogue with the West. The choice is theirs.
    Discussion, including on security and strategic stability, is only possible on equal terms, with respect for each other's interests.
    Russia will continue to work with its partners to form a multipolar world order.
    We will do our utmost to ensure that people who have demonstrated their loyalty to the Fatherland enter the leadership positions of the state administration.
    Putin ended his opening speech with the words ”together we will win.”

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Putin: “We will do our utmost to ensure that people who have demonstrated their loyalty to the Fatherland enter the leadership positions of the state administration.”

    Putin has called Russian democracy ‘sovereign democracy’ which means that those in leadership must first and foremost be loyal to the people of Russia and work for the good of the people.
    This means that the primary role of the country’s leadership is to be a servant of the people.
    And it means that the oligarchs can not do what they want but are obligated to serve people/state. The state leads, not oligarchs or bankers like in west.
    This is important and only so can the state survive and be sovereign and prevent the attacks of oligarchs and their plan to take power in the country.
    ——-
    Excerpt from the link:

    [MORE]

    Democracy
    Democracy hides a secret: the “will of the people” coincides in the final analysis with the interest of financial power. “Everything depends on money, everything strives for money”: that is the fundamental motivation of the masses; this motivation is extremely strong because it is common to all; it is the real motivating force of democracy.
    The motivation of the great mass of people for money becomes the goal in democracy in that it bestows its agreement, its. applause for shining coins. Vote purchasing is not bribery; it is the real political business into which the masses rush wholeheartedly.
    Financial sums are converted in democracy into a corresponding amount of political power; money and political power are exchangeable values.  The rush of the masses to obtain money secures the political influence of money over the masses: that is a well-balanced relationship. The voice of the people is compensated by money; it has its price.

    The mass accepts someone who can execute something whereby it hopes to receive something. One who bets on the masses to reach political power through it must be reconciled to the fact that the masses speculate on him in order to obtain money through him.
    The man of the masses, who receives no more support from any valid system of order, who cannot stand when he should rely on himself, is on top. He is nothing for himself; he is only so much as he has; it is easy for him to betray himself if he receives money for that.
    In every such business he is the winner because the sale prices that he obtains always have an inherently higher value than he himself has. Democracy lives on the fact that everybody expects an advantage for himself from it; it is a political order that least stands in the way of the economic reason.

    Legislative-creative reason created the world empire of the Caesars, the theological the theocratic state with the ‘representative of God’ at the top, the economic the state as imperialistic economic enterprise in which every state citizen has a share in the profits.
    The politically conditioned leadership is in a democracy only a proxy affair; the financial powers send their young men onto the political stage to take care of the bustle that is part of the trade. In a democracy, financial interests determine the course of things; the speeches of the popular tribunes are the mustard that serves to make financial rule palatable.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2023/11/15/the-battle-between-the-eternal-roman-and-the-eternal-jew-selections-from-ernst-niekischs-die-dritte-imperiale-figur-the-third-imperial-figure-1935-part-2-of-2/

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Odd Rabbit

    THESIS: Roman and Jew archetypes can battle it out forever. Neither one, in any combination, results in an industrial society. Industrial society comes from a specific religion, which has failed.

    The Roman archetypes prohibit new engineering in order to preserve the existing order. The West, as it is now, is a somewhat modernized version of the West c.a. 1946. Cities and political machines dominate a helpless population, as trapped in the past as was the USSR c.a. 1980. Its economy is non-urban, but its politics is urban, and its urban areas are nearly dead.

    The Jewish archetype is perhaps better thought of as the "trader" or "salesman" archetype. also prohibits new engineering to preserve the existing order. Examples: NASA, which was ostensibly to pioneer space access and which actually killed space access (and two Shuttle crews) during its monopoly on low earth orbit access. Computer information, which has become as subject to censorship as the Big Three TV networks. CDC, which is as powerful as was the old AMA, etc.

    Industrialization is a byproduct of very smart and very religious Nonconformists in England. As losers in the collapse of Cromwell's Protectorate, they were excluded from government jobs and yet too powerful and numerous a group to destroy. Industrialization was a religious activity. The first "factories" were named after the local fortified warehouses of "factors", who were traders in foreign ports. The businesses they provided labor for employed "paupers" for the shop floor. "Pauper" was a legal class, and designated people who earned less per year than the cost of their food. Paupers lived marginal lives from discounted food, and charity, and worked very hard at finding the discounted food. Typically, they had no children and had short lives. Typically, also, they were the descendants of "second sons", aristocrats a few generations back whose children (except for the first) had descended economically to pauper.

    So there was considerable talent among the paupers -- Many of them could run the highly complex and temperamental capital goods of the early Industrial Revolution. Many of them also utterly lacked the "work ethic", an had the "drink ethic" of Eliza's father in "My Fair Lady". See song, "With a little bit of luck".

    So the paupers in the early Industrial Revolution were treated like soldiers -- kept in walled barracks, marched in formation to and from work (formations make it easier to detect attempted escapes) -- and were, for the first time, adequately fed, housed, and clothed.

    Neither the Roman nor Trader archetypes liked this, but victory in the Napoleonic Wars depended upon the cheap goods and cheap Naval supplies that the factories supplied, and the Traders liked selling imports to the Napoleonic alliance countries at far below local cost of production and a hefty profit [1]. The Roman archetype could see displacement of the previous "agricultural" aristocracy with an "industrial" aristocracy, one democratic at least in form because industrial workers must have political power enough to ensure "living wage" payment for their work, and could not be much coerced because they had become skilled in running capital goods machines that took skill to operate.

    Well, now we have a West that thought it was living in "the end of history". Rome and Trader have dropped "industry" and with it "democracy". We now have welfare cities and "Our Democracy", and a vast import industry dependent on an Imperial US Dollar.

    In such an environment, industry has the short life of mayfly. It is sacrificed for increased sales for the Trader, and increased control for Rome.

    Consider the state of Boeing (to be renamed "Bonk"?). The traders talk of Boeing stock, the "Our Democracy" types talk about arresting people and "inquiries", none of which will make air travel safer or prevent shutting down Boeing when its aircraft don't sell.

    As is the way of both Rome and Traders, future cash flows are heavily discounted, and long term investments are not made, although fraudulent graft producing projects are called "long term investments in the future".
    Example: Present Boeing craft are descendants of the 1950s 707, a 7 decade old design. For scale, the Wright brothers first flew in 1903, only 5 decades before the 707, and the biplane configuration was had been replaced by the monoplane configuration within 3 decades ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biplane ) . The dominance of a 7 decade old design is true technical stagnation. Nobody mentions this.

    So: we are faced with a dilemma, "two problems":
    1) If we want to keep industry, and technological society, we have to do that on the basis of religious faith, probably Christian. The Roman and Trader faiths, neither religious, bleed technological society to death. ( "2+2 is not 4. It is Oppression!! " and "Forget algebra and physics. The real money is in finance or politics!", and Roth's "There is money in poverty.")

    We believe a religious faith that supports technological/industrial society. An we'd have to be willing to die for that faith, and not tolerate heretics.

    2) If we don't want to believe arbitrary things, and prefer (say) the paranoid style of Marxism ("Everybody is trying to exploit me. Everybody! Except, somehow, the Marxist revolutionary vanguard, which isn't logical, but logic is just exploitation, so . . " )

    There is a paradox there. The idea of the "innate worth of humans", hence human reasoning power, cannot be proven rationally (neither can its negation). Nor can anything. Until machine production made slaves uneconomic, most human societies were based on slave labor.

    You could say that the early "factories" were also slave labor de facto, and not be too far off. As things worked out, factories (and mass armies) made all men able to influence governments, hence "made all men free". The current doctrine of total equality and no restrictions was made possible by this early de facto slave labor.

    And once the non-rational faith goes and we're back to human history again, slavery comes back.

    So, it's non-rational faith asserting the dominance of rational thought or it's non-rational slavery again.

    Historically, that has sometimes been the result of major and prolonged wars. After about 3 generations, in the history of all surviving civilizations, the survivors did not want to fight anymore, and picked out some positive sum economic/epistemological game that ends the fighting.

    In the US, for example, Rome is apparently planning to bring all the Gazans (plus many other people) into the US "for the purposes of re-districting" and thus "preserving Our Democracy". Rome sees a chance to save itself from "populism", Traders see a chance to sell things and get graft. That has started a fight between Rome and Traders on the one side, and the descendants of the WW II us population on the other, that would not have been possible while while the US population was Christian. But Christianity had lost during the 1920s and 1930s, was destroyed by secularism during WW II, and will not be revived in its pre-1920s form. Some new non-rational form of thought will be adopted to end the fighting.
    ************************************************************
    1] At one point in the Napoleonic wars, English black market traders were selling vast quantities of uniforms to the French Army at below cost of production in France. N's invasion of Imperial Russia was intended to stop Russian purchase of British goods, UK taxes on such trade kept the UK government solvent.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  • @Fin of a cobra

    that passage of that controversial House bill may have been a major strategic blunder for the pro-Israel forces, the ADL, and the other Jewish groups behind it. Jews ... have waged a highly successful campaign to gain control over the key nodes of our society, but this has always required that their growing strength and influence remain invisible.
     
    This is a great article, as so many have pointed out above -- so thanks again, Mr. Unz. But as there has been so little pushback from the commenters, it seems rather like you're preaching to the choir. The problem is that most of us here at TUR have seen through these masks for quite some time so to us the incontrovertible fact of Jewish Power in America is really no news at all. So why do so many of the comments show a type of excitement about this turn of events? It's obviously not because we've learned anything new.

    Rather, it's probably because these protests have raised our hopes that the normies may finally join us in our awakened state, and also begin seeing what we have already seen for many years. I share this excitement and hope but fear it may merely amount to unwarranted optimism yet again, resulting in just another bout of frustration and disgust -- just like what happened with Trump: his promise to "drain the swamp" amounted to worse than nothing, since all he did was invite even more swamp creatures to slither into the American government.

    So, being the contrarian that I am, here I go again trying to rain on your parade: what you and many commenters here (me included) may be suffering from is "This Time is Different Syndrome". That is, our hope is so great that we may finally be reaching a tipping point in public awareness of Jewish Power that somehow things will begin to change. But where is the evidence of this change that we hope for? (Disgustingly, I am reminded of Obama's "hope and change" campaign.) Just because some Jew-aware public figures are now allowed to comment on Twitter-X? That's hardly convincing evidence.

    No, Mr. Unz, this time is probably no different than last time. The fact that the "masks have come off" does not necessarily imply that the public will actually see anything at all. The public's inherent blindness will prevent most from seeing Jewish Power, even without the mask, and thus no "tipping point" will arrive any time soon. The blindness of the masses goes hand in hand with sheer human stupidity, one of the only two "infinite" entities in existence, according the the phrase attributed to Einstein. This is really all we can count on, in relation to the masses: blindness and stupidity. As for the Jews in power, there are also two things we can always count on: perfidy and evil.

    Adding these different elements of the equation -- public blindness and stupidity; Jewish perfidy and evil -- what can we predict about future events? Like Yogi Berra, Mr. Unz, you probably think it's tough making predictions, "especially about the future", but many of the commenters here would like to read your speculations on what kind of changes these protests might bring about. I understand your hesitancy, given the volatile nature of the situation -- after all you have a reputation to uphold. You probably also don't want to ruin your batting average ("I stand by 99% of all I've written", I think you wrote a few times).

    But if you were to write about what may happen in the future, here is a suggestion for a what a title of this article might look like: "Jewish Power takes off its gloves".

    Replies: @Priss Factor, @Odd Rabbit

    “.. commenters here (me included) may be suffering from is “This Time is Different Syndrome”. That is, our hope is so great that we may finally be reaching a tipping point in public awareness of Jewish Power that somehow things will begin to change. But where is the evidence of this change..”

    I have suffered long from that syndrome… and lost all hope. Why?
    Ron has the answer in the article:
    —[Consider the fascinating perspective of the recently deceased Boris Berezovsky, once the most powerful of the Russian oligarchs and the puppet master behind President Boris Yeltsin during the late 1990s. After looting billions in national wealth and elevating Vladimir Putin to the presidency, he overreached himself and eventually went into exile.
    According to the New York Times, he had planned to transform Russia into a fake two-party state—one social-democratic and one neoconservative—in which heated public battles would be fought on divisive, symbolic issues, while behind the scenes both parties would actually be controlled by the same ruling elites. With the citizenry thus permanently divided and popular dissatisfaction safely channeled into meaningless dead-ends,
    Russia’s rulers could maintain unlimited wealth and power for themselves, with little threat to their reign. Given America’s history over the last couple of decades, perhaps we can guess where Berezovsky got his idea for such a clever political scheme.]

    In this kind of democracy it’s only possible to live in “This Time is Different Syndrome”.
    The west has no hope. The money only talks. China and BRICS-countries have not this kind of democracy and they are not destroying themselves. They have better future.

    Excerpts from Putin’s inaugural speech
    The interests and security of the Russian people are paramount.
    Russia’s central goal is to save people and preserve centuries-old values and traditions.
    We will not refuse dialogue with the West. The choice is theirs.
    Discussion, including on security and strategic stability, is only possible on equal terms, with respect for each other’s interests.
    Russia will continue to work with its partners to form a multipolar world order.
    We will do our utmost to ensure that people who have demonstrated their loyalty to the Fatherland enter the leadership positions of the state administration.
    Putin ended his opening speech with the words ”together we will win.”

    • Replies: @Odd Rabbit
    @Odd Rabbit

    Putin: "We will do our utmost to ensure that people who have demonstrated their loyalty to the Fatherland enter the leadership positions of the state administration."

    Putin has called Russian democracy 'sovereign democracy' which means that those in leadership must first and foremost be loyal to the people of Russia and work for the good of the people.
    This means that the primary role of the country's leadership is to be a servant of the people.
    And it means that the oligarchs can not do what they want but are obligated to serve people/state. The state leads, not oligarchs or bankers like in west.
    This is important and only so can the state survive and be sovereign and prevent the attacks of oligarchs and their plan to take power in the country.
    -------
    Excerpt from the link:
    Democracy
    Democracy hides a secret: the “will of the people” coincides in the final analysis with the interest of financial power. “Everything depends on money, everything strives for money”: that is the fundamental motivation of the masses; this motivation is extremely strong because it is common to all; it is the real motivating force of democracy.
    The motivation of the great mass of people for money becomes the goal in democracy in that it bestows its agreement, its. applause for shining coins. Vote purchasing is not bribery; it is the real political business into which the masses rush wholeheartedly.
    Financial sums are converted in democracy into a corresponding amount of political power; money and political power are exchangeable values.  The rush of the masses to obtain money secures the political influence of money over the masses: that is a well-balanced relationship. The voice of the people is compensated by money; it has its price.

    The mass accepts someone who can execute something whereby it hopes to receive something. One who bets on the masses to reach political power through it must be reconciled to the fact that the masses speculate on him in order to obtain money through him.
    The man of the masses, who receives no more support from any valid system of order, who cannot stand when he should rely on himself, is on top. He is nothing for himself; he is only so much as he has; it is easy for him to betray himself if he receives money for that.
    In every such business he is the winner because the sale prices that he obtains always have an inherently higher value than he himself has. Democracy lives on the fact that everybody expects an advantage for himself from it; it is a political order that least stands in the way of the economic reason.

    Legislative-creative reason created the world empire of the Caesars, the theological the theocratic state with the ‘representative of God’ at the top, the economic the state as imperialistic economic enterprise in which every state citizen has a share in the profits.
    The politically conditioned leadership is in a democracy only a proxy affair; the financial powers send their young men onto the political stage to take care of the bustle that is part of the trade. In a democracy, financial interests determine the course of things; the speeches of the popular tribunes are the mustard that serves to make financial rule palatable.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2023/11/15/the-battle-between-the-eternal-roman-and-the-eternal-jew-selections-from-ernst-niekischs-die-dritte-imperiale-figur-the-third-imperial-figure-1935-part-2-of-2/

    Replies: @Anonymous

  • @Mr_Chow_Mein
    The mask should of come off when building 7 collapsed for no reason after the twin towers...that should of been the moment that Americans had to ask themselves...something isn't right here...but they didn't...they couldn't believe that such a malevolent force was in control of their nation...even when the third plane failed to materialize to hit building 7 and the building still fell they swallowed the official story...some people just don't want to wake up from the matrix.

    Replies: @gidoutahere, @Katrinka, @Heretic50, @Anon, @Odd Rabbit, @Bruce In Texas

    “…they couldn’t believe that such a malevolent force was in control of their nation..”

    And having been captured by that power, they have begun to destroy Europe and subjugate it to their power.

    Some basic principles for the national struggle
    With permission from: Danmarks Frihedsraad, a Danish Nationalist site.
    Excerpt from the article

    6. It is necessary to realize that all the evils that nationalist Danes today complain about and seek to combat are the result of Hitler losing the Second World War. Had Hitler won the Second World War — or even better: Had World War II not happened — these evils would not exist today. Copenhagen would not have had 20% foreign inhabitants, billions of kroner and euros would not have been spent on foreign aid and refugees, Danes would still have had children (there would have been no pensioner hump), Africa would still have been under European control, and the people of this amazing continent would not have had to fear constant civil wars, violence and famine. Had the Germans won the war, there would certainly have been many things to complain about, but the biological existence of our people would not have been threatened and everything else can be restored.

    7. It is necessary to realize that the Holocaust of the Jews is the means used today to suppress any national revival in Europe.
    8. It is necessary to realize that America and America’s intervention in Europe’s internal affairs has been to Europe’s misfortune – and that America’s continued power will lead to the destruction of the White race. America has not saved us twice in the last century, as a foolish, history-less politician who likes to act as a representative of national Denmark has claimed – it has twice prevented an internal settlement of European affairs.
    Without America’s intervention in the First World War, the warring parties would have had to recognize that neither was capable of defeating the other and would have had to make a peace that would have preserved the status quo in Western Europe. Germany would not have been humiliated, there would have been no war reparations, no economic collapse, no Hitler (!), no World War II, no “holocaust”, 50 million Europeans would not have been killed, there would have been no bombed cities, no destruction of European cultural values, no communism in half of Europe, no Berlin Wall, no Middle East conflict, no immigration of the 3rd world masses into Europe, no Third World masses in Europe, no developing countries in Europe. world masses in Europe, no development aid, no terrorism, no September 11 …… in short, none of everything that makes our existence poorer and threatens our future.
    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/05/04/some-basic-principles-for-the-national-struggle/

    • Replies: @the Man Behind the Curtain
    @Odd Rabbit

    Hmm…

    They have a point.

    Well, I’d say burn Europe to the ground and legalize polygamy in the USA (no male immigrants please)!

  • You are a bright star on the dark firmament, Mr Ron Unz!

    Thank you very much for the hard work to bring forth info and analysis that is not inbued with due regards to the established way to toy with facts and the truth.

    • Agree: anarchyst, Odd Rabbit
  • Excellent article, should be widely distributed.

    “they agreed that Zionists were the greatest threat to American freedom and that our country was “under political occupation” by the Israel Lobby.”

    Scott Adams says he loves the Jews, he loves the Israelis but “fuck Israel”.

    I recently read an article that stated “Israel should be seen as a single transnational Jewish entity. I wholeheartedly agree and it is globally organized Jewry that is the predator that is destroying our country and our rights. The ADL, SPLC, NIAS and all the other organizations are the tentacles of this monstrous entity. And the Jewish people are to blame because anytime there is some event that casts shadows over Israel, a Jew or Jewish organization 95% of Jews blindly support the Jewish perpetrators. Scott Adams loves Jews and Israels but they massively support the genocide of Palestinians and the other goals off global organized Jewry: open borders, turning America into a minority white nation, promoting the Marxist identity politics. This is a disease that England, France, Italy and Germany also have; each of these country’s leaders flew to Israel to debase themselves by showing their support for the genocide.

    This is not just a U.S. problem, it has always been a problem. On March 24, 1933 global organized Jewry decided to attack Germany, the headline in the Daily Express was “JUDEA Declares War on Germany”. Maybe we should be focusing on this transnational Jewish entity “JUDEA”, not the low level thugs like the ADL.

  • The mask should of come off when building 7 collapsed for no reason after the twin towers…that should of been the moment that Americans had to ask themselves…something isn’t right here…but they didn’t…they couldn’t believe that such a malevolent force was in control of their nation…even when the third plane failed to materialize to hit building 7 and the building still fell they swallowed the official story…some people just don’t want to wake up from the matrix.

    • Replies: @gidoutahere
    @Mr_Chow_Mein

    I asked my neighbor how many buildings collapsed on 911. Two he replied.

    Replies: @Captain Jones

    , @Katrinka
    @Mr_Chow_Mein

    If you ask around most people have never even heard of building 7. Ignorance is bliss, I guess.

    , @Heretic50
    @Mr_Chow_Mein

    I think the plane that was meant to hit WTC Building 7 was the one that went down in Pennsylvania.

    , @Anon
    @Mr_Chow_Mein

    "The mask should of come off when building 7 collapsed for no reason after the twin towers…"

    Or the "blinders" should have come off after the Vegas Massacre false flag. Or the blinders should have come off after the Covid clusterphuck. Or the blinders should have come off after the Covid clot/kill shot. Or the blinders should have come off when TWA flight 800 was murdered by missiles according to witnesses. Or the blinders should have come off after the Oklahoma City Bombing when large volumes of evidence showed that this was a false flag. Or the blinders should have come off after the Gulf of Tonkin False Flag. Or the blinders .....

    We are frogs. Happily sitting in a pot of water ..... heading to a boil ......

    Replies: @Badger Down

    , @Odd Rabbit
    @Mr_Chow_Mein

    "...they couldn’t believe that such a malevolent force was in control of their nation.."

    And having been captured by that power, they have begun to destroy Europe and subjugate it to their power.

    Some basic principles for the national struggle
    With permission from: Danmarks Frihedsraad, a Danish Nationalist site.
    Excerpt from the article

    6. It is necessary to realize that all the evils that nationalist Danes today complain about and seek to combat are the result of Hitler losing the Second World War. Had Hitler won the Second World War — or even better: Had World War II not happened — these evils would not exist today. Copenhagen would not have had 20% foreign inhabitants, billions of kroner and euros would not have been spent on foreign aid and refugees, Danes would still have had children (there would have been no pensioner hump), Africa would still have been under European control, and the people of this amazing continent would not have had to fear constant civil wars, violence and famine. Had the Germans won the war, there would certainly have been many things to complain about, but the biological existence of our people would not have been threatened and everything else can be restored.

    7. It is necessary to realize that the Holocaust of the Jews is the means used today to suppress any national revival in Europe.
    8. It is necessary to realize that America and America’s intervention in Europe’s internal affairs has been to Europe’s misfortune – and that America’s continued power will lead to the destruction of the White race. America has not saved us twice in the last century, as a foolish, history-less politician who likes to act as a representative of national Denmark has claimed – it has twice prevented an internal settlement of European affairs.
    Without America’s intervention in the First World War, the warring parties would have had to recognize that neither was capable of defeating the other and would have had to make a peace that would have preserved the status quo in Western Europe. Germany would not have been humiliated, there would have been no war reparations, no economic collapse, no Hitler (!), no World War II, no “holocaust”, 50 million Europeans would not have been killed, there would have been no bombed cities, no destruction of European cultural values, no communism in half of Europe, no Berlin Wall, no Middle East conflict, no immigration of the 3rd world masses into Europe, no Third World masses in Europe, no developing countries in Europe. world masses in Europe, no development aid, no terrorism, no September 11 …… in short, none of everything that makes our existence poorer and threatens our future.
    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/05/04/some-basic-principles-for-the-national-struggle/

    Replies: @the Man Behind the Curtain

    , @Bruce In Texas
    @Mr_Chow_Mein

    You antisemite Larry explains here that because everyone was sad so the fire department pulled it and it fell down.
    https://rumble.com/v1jtw5l-september-11th-larry-silverstein-confession-that-wtc-7-was-destroyed-by-con.html
    https://imageio.forbes.com/specials-images/imageserve/971690622/960x0.jpg?format=jpg&width=960

  • The roots of the “Hitler-Controlled-Opposition” myth go back to the 1920s and 1930s in the circles of Hitler’s political rivals, namely the German and Soviet Communist Parties, the leftists of the West and the hard left faction of the National Socialist German Worker’s Party (NSDAP).[1] The intention was obviously to prevent Hitler and the NSDAP...
  • @Anonymous534
    @Hulkamania

    He had a weird schizo love for the British Empire combined with hatred of Jews, even though the British Empire was run by the Jews.
    That's like being anti-Jew but pro-American Empire today. It is just not a coherent position. Try being an anti-Jew ruler of a major country today, the US will do all it can to get rid of you. But Hitler though he would be allies with the British. That's what vegetarianism does to the brain.
    Sad!

    Replies: @Digital Samizdat, @Godfree Roberts, @Malla, @Wildsilver

    Jewish people in Germany were widely different but the same race.
    The majority were Communists which made an easy double target & loaded statistics heavily to race
    Then there were Jews whose families had been Germans for generations.
    Many of these held high military rank, had their own Brigades etc & fought against Communism & USSR.
    There were also Zionists who had their own special relationship with Nazi Germany in getting their ‘people’ moved out to Palestine and removing their competition
    Interestingly, of the four main Jewish denominations, the Zionists survived the carnage with the least loss of their ‘tribe’.

    https://twitter.com/bHarshy12/status/1786737537651810311/photo/1

    That the origin of Communism, Zionism & Fascism occurred in mid 19th century Imperial Britain is surely a coincidence, no?

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
    @Wildsilver

    > The majority were Communists

    Total nonsense. The vast majority were either liberals or Social Democrats.

  • @Obergefreiter
    @Trinity


    almost pulled it off
     
    This statement is very misleading. Jews, who we now know, and can prove, were the ones set on world conquest. Not Germany, and not the NSDAP.

    What Hitler "almost pulled off" was the defeat of the Judeo-Bolshevic Red Rapist Army, which like Ukraine today, was being propped up by the Judeo-Capitalists that had caused the Russian "Revolution". Without the secret support of Churchill and Roosevelt which started long before Barbarossa, Russia would have collapsed before December 1941.

    Hitler famously allowed the BEF to escape at Dunkirk because he couldn't bear the thought of massacring so many white Christian English soldiers. Many, like Makow who I posted above, claim that this blunder is proof that Hitler was a Jewish spy.

    Hitler felt the same way about Christian Slavs, who greeted him as the great liberator.

    Makow also claims that Hitler deliberately made other blunders, such as Stalingrad, despite being assured by Goering that the Luftwaffe could keep the 6th army supplied.

    In any case, Hitler made numerous peace offers to the Anglo-Jewish "allies" and consistently said that he would leave the English empire intact. This is not a trait of madman set on world domination.

    Are these the actions of a megalomaniac like Roosevelt, Stalin, Churchill or even Netanyahu today?

    https://imgur.com/596LNLr.png

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Some basic principles for the national struggle
    With permission from: Danmarks Frihedsraad, a Danish Nationalist site.
    Excerpt from the article

    6. It is necessary to realize that all the evils that nationalist Danes today complain about and seek to combat are the result of Hitler losing the Second World War. Had Hitler won the Second World War — or even better: Had World War II not happened — these evils would not exist today. Copenhagen would not have had 20% foreign inhabitants, billions of kroner and euros would not have been spent on foreign aid and refugees, Danes would still have had children (there would have been no pensioner hump), Africa would still have been under European control, and the people of this amazing continent would not have had to fear constant civil wars, violence and famine. Had the Germans won the war, there would certainly have been many things to complain about, but the biological existence of our people would not have been threatened and everything else can be restored.

    7. It is necessary to realize that the Holocaust of the Jews is the means used today to suppress any national revival in Europe.
    8. It is necessary to realize that America and America’s intervention in Europe’s internal affairs has been to Europe’s misfortune – and that America’s continued power will lead to the destruction of the White race. America has not saved us twice in the last century, as a foolish, history-less politician who likes to act as a representative of national Denmark has claimed – it has twice prevented an internal settlement of European affairs. Without America’s intervention in the First World War, the warring parties would have had to recognize that neither was capable of defeating the other and would have had to make a peace that would have preserved the status quo in Western Europe. Germany would not have been humiliated, there would have been no war reparations, no economic collapse, no Hitler (!), no World War II, no “holocaust”, 50 million Europeans would not have been killed, there would have been no bombed cities, no destruction of European cultural values, no communism in half of Europe, no Berlin Wall, no Middle East conflict, no immigration of the 3rd world masses into Europe, no Third World masses in Europe, no developing countries in Europe. world masses in Europe, no development aid, no terrorism, no September 11 …… in short, none of everything that makes our existence poorer and threatens our future.
    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/05/04/some-basic-principles-for-the-national-struggle/

    • Replies: @Obergefreiter
    @Odd Rabbit

    The Danish behavior, and Scandinavian behavior in general, post WWII, will be one of histories biggest conundrums. I think that Scandinavian feminism is the root cause. It is gob smacking how the "empathetic" and compassionate gender consistently turn into war mongers and intolerant tyrants whenever they achieve power.

    Stoltenberg and Rasmussen were both feminized Scandinavian war mongers.

    One of the aspects of this Judaic mind control over the west that bothers me most is the fact that all the European prosperity has been pissed down a Jewish toilet. As you say, if Hitler had prevailed the entire planet wouldn't be the cesspool that the Jews have made of it.

  • @Trinity
    @Alden

    Lol. Hitler was fighting against GIANTS named the British Empire, which was what, about 1/4 of the world, the huge Soviet Empire and America as well as France, etc. LMAO. Oh yeah, this guy surely was a loser compared to Franco. Germany, a nation of 70-75 million and about the size of Montana nearly took on over half the world and almost pulled it off. Hitler was fighting against impossible odds, Franco? No comparison.

    Replies: @Alden, @Obergefreiter

    almost pulled it off

    This statement is very misleading. Jews, who we now know, and can prove, were the ones set on world conquest. Not Germany, and not the NSDAP.

    What Hitler “almost pulled off” was the defeat of the Judeo-Bolshevic Red Rapist Army, which like Ukraine today, was being propped up by the Judeo-Capitalists that had caused the Russian “Revolution”. Without the secret support of Churchill and Roosevelt which started long before Barbarossa, Russia would have collapsed before December 1941.

    Hitler famously allowed the BEF to escape at Dunkirk because he couldn’t bear the thought of massacring so many white Christian English soldiers. Many, like Makow who I posted above, claim that this blunder is proof that Hitler was a Jewish spy.

    Hitler felt the same way about Christian Slavs, who greeted him as the great liberator.

    Makow also claims that Hitler deliberately made other blunders, such as Stalingrad, despite being assured by Goering that the Luftwaffe could keep the 6th army supplied.

    In any case, Hitler made numerous peace offers to the Anglo-Jewish “allies” and consistently said that he would leave the English empire intact. This is not a trait of madman set on world domination.

    Are these the actions of a megalomaniac like Roosevelt, Stalin, Churchill or even Netanyahu today?

    • Replies: @Odd Rabbit
    @Obergefreiter

    Some basic principles for the national struggle
    With permission from: Danmarks Frihedsraad, a Danish Nationalist site.
    Excerpt from the article

    6. It is necessary to realize that all the evils that nationalist Danes today complain about and seek to combat are the result of Hitler losing the Second World War. Had Hitler won the Second World War — or even better: Had World War II not happened — these evils would not exist today. Copenhagen would not have had 20% foreign inhabitants, billions of kroner and euros would not have been spent on foreign aid and refugees, Danes would still have had children (there would have been no pensioner hump), Africa would still have been under European control, and the people of this amazing continent would not have had to fear constant civil wars, violence and famine. Had the Germans won the war, there would certainly have been many things to complain about, but the biological existence of our people would not have been threatened and everything else can be restored.

    7. It is necessary to realize that the Holocaust of the Jews is the means used today to suppress any national revival in Europe.
    8. It is necessary to realize that America and America’s intervention in Europe’s internal affairs has been to Europe’s misfortune – and that America’s continued power will lead to the destruction of the White race. America has not saved us twice in the last century, as a foolish, history-less politician who likes to act as a representative of national Denmark has claimed – it has twice prevented an internal settlement of European affairs. Without America’s intervention in the First World War, the warring parties would have had to recognize that neither was capable of defeating the other and would have had to make a peace that would have preserved the status quo in Western Europe. Germany would not have been humiliated, there would have been no war reparations, no economic collapse, no Hitler (!), no World War II, no “holocaust”, 50 million Europeans would not have been killed, there would have been no bombed cities, no destruction of European cultural values, no communism in half of Europe, no Berlin Wall, no Middle East conflict, no immigration of the 3rd world masses into Europe, no Third World masses in Europe, no developing countries in Europe. world masses in Europe, no development aid, no terrorism, no September 11 …… in short, none of everything that makes our existence poorer and threatens our future.
    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/05/04/some-basic-principles-for-the-national-struggle/

    Replies: @Obergefreiter

  • @j2
    @Odd Rabbit

    "If you have more funny stories you could tell me more."

    I had to, you asked me to read the story by Degrelle. There are many histories of Hitler, who he was and who he was not, like this more main stream version;
    https://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/joins.htm

    But what matters is that Hitler was poor in mathematics in the school. About all these stories how Hitler was antisemitic at early age, I do not know. He did not show it before the army course for propaganda agents in 1919. I still do not think that a spy sent by army to spy a party (that maybe was suspected by the army to be communistic, or maybe was not as it was strongly anticommunistic) would join the party in any other role than that which he has been assigned by the army, be it an infiltrator or be it the long looked for leader for that party. Historians and people presenting their memories, like Degrelle, tell something, but the only way to find the truth is to use logical thinking (that is, mathematical thinking also called common sense). If something does not match, then it is not so. Something does not match in any of these histories of Hitler and history is just a story.

    Replies: @Obergefreiter, @Odd Rabbit

    “… but the only way to find the truth is to use logical thinking (that is, mathematical thinking also called common sense). If something does not match, then it is not so. Something does not match in any of these histories of Hitler and history is just a story.”

    That’s true… but everyone has his own common sense and that’s why there are many opinions and theories. Basically it is a matter of brain function and your own world view. If you think that capitalism is good you automatically underestimate socialism or the other way round.
    The truth for you is that what feels good. It has nothing to do with mathematics.

    • Replies: @j2
    @Odd Rabbit

    "The truth for you is that what feels good. It has nothing to do with mathematics."

    Maybe so, but I see it differently. There are different ways of concluding something. Historians want to have many so called facts (they are usually not proven to be true, so they are "facts") and then they compose a theory that fits most of the facts and they ignore the outlier "facts" that do not fit the theory. In mathematics and (more or less) exact sciences it is different: one certain detail that does not fit the explanation is enough to disprove the theory. The difference is essentially that in mathematics there is something that is true, a correct proof is true, while in history there is nothing that cannot be disputed. Several historians have told me that there is no such thing as the historical truth, yes, logically things happened in one way and only one way, but there is no method to select the correct way from all possible alternatives. There is no test for what is a correct explanations. This way of matters is generally accepted by historians, but I do not think it should be accepted. In theories that are controversial and against the consensus, like conspiracy theories always are, one cannot get a consensus. Then one should use the mathematical way: make a theory (like that Hitler was not controlled opposition) and find one single sufficiently certain fact that disproves the theory.

    I can better demonstrate this with the JFK assassination. The official theory is that Oswald shot three times. Jim Fetzer's theory is that there were 12 shots. Both theories are disproven by single piece of evidence (that can be argued to be stronger than anything these two theories have): the Dictabelt shows three clear shots an two less clear and combining the Dictabelt with the Zapruder film or Connelly's testimony we must take one of the two less clear shots as a gunshot, and one implied as JFK fell backwards. Thus, there were not less than 4 shots and not more than 6 shots. This is what I mean. In order to show something true or false, ignore initially all other evidence, take only very few and most certain facts, deduce from them something that shows your case, and then check all other evidence if it is in contradiction with your conclusion.

    With the question whether Hitler was controlled opposition I made my case in this thread in the comment 22 with 4 claims that I think are all strong. I have not seen any valid arguments that show any of these four claims false. If they are true, then Hitler was controlled opposition. That does not imply that he was conscious of it.

    I think there is more that one can suspect, only I cannot make very strong arguments, but I suspect that Hitler believed that he was 1/8 Jewish and was consciously helping Zionists to get Jews to Palestine. I think the story of Hitler as an antisemite is false, it is a part of the official story explaining that all non-Jews have this antisemitism in them, but also a part of the neo-Nazi myth of Saint Adolf. This story may be false. Hitler had too many Jewish connections. But this is only my opinion.

  • American Jewry is facing an unprecedented domestic crisis over its support for Israel’s war in Gaza. The last two pieces of unpopular Jewish-backed legislation rammed through the House, the Antisemitism Awareness Act and a $95 billion dollar foreign aid package to Ukraine and Israel, required Republican Majority leader Mike Johnson to circumvent his own party...
  • @Fin of a cobra

    American Jewry is facing an unprecedented domestic crisis over its support for Israel’s war in Gaza.
     
    There are many articles on this site arguing that these protests against Israel and in favor of the plight of the Palestinians of Gaza might be the event that delivers a debilitating blow to Jewish Power in America. That first sentence of the article quoted above seems to point in that direction. What we must remember, however, is that old joke between the lion and the gazelle and apply it to this situation: the protestors are only running for their dinner, whereas the Jews are battling for their lives. In other words, the motivation of each group is vastly different.

    These protestors merely want Justice, whereas what all Jews want is to save the Jewish race from "another Holocaust". That's why the Jews immediately accuse all protestors of "antisemitism", because even the slightest criticism directed toward Jews, no matter the atrocities committed by The Tribe -- even genocide -- will be registered in the Jewish brain as an attempt to wipe off the Jews from the face of the earth.

    What would be ideal is to project ourselves into the inscrutable Jewish mind and attempt to think like a Jew. But, alas, this is virtually impossible, so maybe we will have to satisfy ourselves with an analogy between the Jews and another tribe which presents similar characteristics: the "Aspies" (individuals with Asperger's Syndrome or Autism Spectrum Disorder -- ASD).

    There is an intriguing fMRI study on Aspies which shows that just looking at a face, even one with neutral expressions, triggers their amygdala and thus their fight-or-flight response, causing all sorts of havoc in their social encounters. My theory is that something similar is happening within the brain of the Jew: merely looking at the face of a goy already triggers the Jew's amygdala, and this reaction is raised to the nth degree when receiving direct criticism from the goys. Even the slightest "protest" from goys will set the Jews on highest alert and will push them to extreme measures -- even a genocidal rampage, as seen in Gaza. Having this weird neurodiversity like the Aspies, the Jew truly believes that he is under constant and permanent threat from the goys.

    And that's the whole problem with the analyses in articles which attempt explain the "protests": a failure to take into account the Jews' inherent neurology. This type of brain activity reveals the Jews' deepest motivation for doing what they have done all throughout history, which is crushing goys with extreme prejudice. The Jews' reaction to these university protests are only the latest event in line with this tradition. As in the past, by countering and smashing the protests, the Jew intimately believes he is fighting for the survival of the Jewish race.

    What most analysts fail to understand is that Jew can't help acting the way he does, even if to outsiders their actions seem unhinged: the Jew-race-survival-instinct is wired into the Jew's brain. It is the very fabric of his being. If we could do an fMRI study on the Jews as the Jews look at the face of a goy, we would see the amygdala setting off constant red alerts.

    If this Jew amygdala theory has any validity, it should also have some predictive capacity: it would predict that the Jews do indeed feel an existential threat to the Jewish race from these protests and thus will expel, arrest, prosecute, and destroy all protestors and even sympathizers. The Jews will use their awesome power in all domains -- lawfare, media assaults, financial blackmail -- and wage all out war on goys. The Jews really believe they are under mortal threat: their amygdala tells them so. To doubt that the Jews truly believe this clouds our thoughts and limits our analytical capacity, making us unsure of what the Jews' next steps will be. There should be no doubt: the Jews will stop at nothing to guarantee the survival of the Jewish race.

    Replies: @anonymous, @Wokechoke, @muh muh, @Bedford, @Anon, @Simon D, @Odd Rabbit, @John Trout, @annamaria, @Fin of a cobra, @DogZ, @niceland, @Treg

    “What most analysts fail to understand is that Jew can’t help acting the way he does, even if to outsiders their actions seem unhinged: the Jew-race-survival-instinct is wired into the Jew’s brain. ”

    So is it more or less with all people: the biology is the primary factor which dominates the behavior of all people. If you have this weird neurodiversity (Asperger’s Syndrome or Autism Spectrum Disorder — ASD) you truly believe that you are under constant and permanent threat and that you must be prepared to defend yourself.
    You can not control it because it is in the genes. It is a product of evolution like all in your body. And you cannot adjust it yourself, it works automatically.
    These genetic facts should be taken into account when mixing people and building a multicultural world.

    I’m glad to see that you/’cobra’ have taken this amygdala-theory to explain – as Makow below in my comment – why ”they believe Jews cannot coexist with non-Jews”.
    It’s really mainly but of course not always a matter of brain function, neurology/ genetics and amygdala-sensitivity and if you don’t accept these facts you get in trouble.
    Excerpt from link:

    Genetic Behaviour
    Most people automatically assume that they are consciously responsible for their actions. Yet our instinctive (genetically engendered) belief in the supremacy of the rational brain demands an underlying bet that should seduce only the most demented of gamblers. It is generally conceded that there are somewhere between 10 and 100 million species inhabiting this planet. The best guess is currently around 20-30 million. It is also conceded that all of these species are shaped and driven by their genetic material. So, one exception in 20-30 million? Fat chance!
    The conscious ‘rational brain’, centred in the pre- frontal cortex, begins to fire up some 500 milliseconds later— after the board of genetic directors in the basement have had time to assess the incoming data for any concealed threats to their security and survival. If threats are implicit in the data, the parliament of genes overwhelms the rational brain with a flood of emotion and issues a set of directives for well-proven genetic behaviour.
    So emotion is the flag of genetic behaviour and signals that the rational brain has been bypassed in the interest of long-term genetic survival. If our Amygdala has been triggered, we react ‘instinctively’ with anger, lust or fear. If not, then we think and act ‘morally’—out of love, duty, or a sense of justice and compassion. Meanwhile the brain’s propaganda department patches together a reasoned explanation for that behaviour in order to maintain a reassuring facade of rational ‘free will’.

    http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/THOC/enigma_code.pdf

    • LOL: Iksit
  • American Jewry is facing an unprecedented domestic crisis over its support for Israel’s war in Gaza.

    There are many articles on this site arguing that these protests against Israel and in favor of the plight of the Palestinians of Gaza might be the event that delivers a debilitating blow to Jewish Power in America. That first sentence of the article quoted above seems to point in that direction. What we must remember, however, is that old joke between the lion and the gazelle and apply it to this situation: the protestors are only running for their dinner, whereas the Jews are battling for their lives. In other words, the motivation of each group is vastly different.

    These protestors merely want Justice, whereas what all Jews want is to save the Jewish race from “another Holocaust”. That’s why the Jews immediately accuse all protestors of “antisemitism”, because even the slightest criticism directed toward Jews, no matter the atrocities committed by The Tribe — even genocide — will be registered in the Jewish brain as an attempt to wipe off the Jews from the face of the earth.

    What would be ideal is to project ourselves into the inscrutable Jewish mind and attempt to think like a Jew. But, alas, this is virtually impossible, so maybe we will have to satisfy ourselves with an analogy between the Jews and another tribe which presents similar characteristics: the “Aspies” (individuals with Asperger’s Syndrome or Autism Spectrum Disorder — ASD).

    There is an intriguing fMRI study on Aspies which shows that just looking at a face, even one with neutral expressions, triggers their amygdala and thus their fight-or-flight response, causing all sorts of havoc in their social encounters. My theory is that something similar is happening within the brain of the Jew: merely looking at the face of a goy already triggers the Jew’s amygdala, and this reaction is raised to the nth degree when receiving direct criticism from the goys. Even the slightest “protest” from goys will set the Jews on highest alert and will push them to extreme measures — even a genocidal rampage, as seen in Gaza. Having this weird neurodiversity like the Aspies, the Jew truly believes that he is under constant and permanent threat from the goys.

    And that’s the whole problem with the analyses in articles which attempt explain the “protests”: a failure to take into account the Jews’ inherent neurology. This type of brain activity reveals the Jews’ deepest motivation for doing what they have done all throughout history, which is crushing goys with extreme prejudice. The Jews’ reaction to these university protests are only the latest event in line with this tradition. As in the past, by countering and smashing the protests, the Jew intimately believes he is fighting for the survival of the Jewish race.

    What most analysts fail to understand is that Jew can’t help acting the way he does, even if to outsiders their actions seem unhinged: the Jew-race-survival-instinct is wired into the Jew’s brain. It is the very fabric of his being. If we could do an fMRI study on the Jews as the Jews look at the face of a goy, we would see the amygdala setting off constant red alerts.

    If this Jew amygdala theory has any validity, it should also have some predictive capacity: it would predict that the Jews do indeed feel an existential threat to the Jewish race from these protests and thus will expel, arrest, prosecute, and destroy all protestors and even sympathizers. The Jews will use their awesome power in all domains — lawfare, media assaults, financial blackmail — and wage all out war on goys. The Jews really believe they are under mortal threat: their amygdala tells them so. To doubt that the Jews truly believe this clouds our thoughts and limits our analytical capacity, making us unsure of what the Jews’ next steps will be. There should be no doubt: the Jews will stop at nothing to guarantee the survival of the Jewish race.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    @Fin of a cobra

    Whites will have to become even more desperate and ruthless than Jews in order to survive. But I don't see this happening as many are privileged servants of Jews. Then you have White women, who have shown they will topple their own men and children for perks. Kikes have this mindset that they should be allowed to commit crimes against humanity and no one should ever bother them about it. It's astounding that Jews in Israel can allow genocide to be committed in their name against a captive people who have been brutalized for 80 years, and then bitch about anti-semitism - when they're not even semites themselves. These "people" are psychopathic liars and murderers. And Americans love them.

    Replies: @skrik, @Ximenes

    , @Wokechoke
    @Fin of a cobra

    I know an old jewess who dislikes a particular person who has an uncanny respenblance to a young David Duke. Even though he’s a nice enough liberal he’s a Ginger.

    Yes it’s correct. They see white people and want to kill.

    Replies: @SomeDude, @Jay Fink

    , @muh muh
    @Fin of a cobra

    Without affirming or denying the 'hard-wired' theory you present, it's enough to observe most of them do perceive existential threats where none exist, and that the preponderance of Jews are unique in this regard.

    But this is also their fatal flaw. While they've been able to persuade others of such threats successfully for quite some time, this sort of influence has an expiration date. The lies become more outlandish, the exaggerations more transparent until gentile sympathy dries up like dew on a cloudless summer afternoon.

    Their reckoning is coming, it's just a matter of when. Until then, we'll have to endure the interim as best we can.

    , @Bedford
    @Fin of a cobra

    Pre-Traumatic Stress Disorder (Gilad Atzmon)

    , @Anon
    @Fin of a cobra

    They're narcissists. And sociopaths. Some of them are psychopaths. That's really the explanation. Narcs can be charming. They have an overinflated sense of worth. They think they are superior to everyone else, but secretly they have very fragile egos. They can be generous, but their motivation is the praise they get for it -- not the satisfaction of having done good. Everything revolves around them and their feelings. They are incapable of empathy.

    The moment when a Narc becomes dangerous is when you either embarrass them or tell them "no". If their fragile egos get bruised, they will rage and will do everything in their power to destroy you. All while crying and claiming to be the victim. They'll frequently say "see what you made me do" as they will never accept blame and always think that the victim is the real evil for provoking them into doing something bad.

    Yes, they are extremely dangerous. A narc will do anything to maintain the illusion of their superiority. When reality threatens to invade their fantasy of "chosen-ness", they're like a cornered wild animal. I'm certain that there is real fear that the Samson option will be deployed if the world were to actually deliver justice for Palestinians.

    It appears that the world has collectively decided to appease the genocidal narcs by letting them slaughter the Palestinians. Our political leaders would rather live as slaves than die standing up to tyranny (or have those Epstein tapes released).

    , @Simon D
    @Fin of a cobra

    Interesting! Explains one of their defining characteristics, paranoia. The neurological defect you posit could be the result of centuries of inbreeding.

    Replies: @annamaria

    , @Odd Rabbit
    @Fin of a cobra

    "What most analysts fail to understand is that Jew can’t help acting the way he does, even if to outsiders their actions seem unhinged: the Jew-race-survival-instinct is wired into the Jew’s brain. "

    So is it more or less with all people: the biology is the primary factor which dominates the behavior of all people. If you have this weird neurodiversity (Asperger’s Syndrome or Autism Spectrum Disorder — ASD) you truly believe that you are under constant and permanent threat and that you must be prepared to defend yourself.
    You can not control it because it is in the genes. It is a product of evolution like all in your body. And you cannot adjust it yourself, it works automatically.
    These genetic facts should be taken into account when mixing people and building a multicultural world.
    ---
    I'm glad to see that you/'cobra' have taken this amygdala-theory to explain - as Makow below in my comment - why ”they believe Jews cannot coexist with non-Jews”.
    It's really mainly but of course not always a matter of brain function, neurology/ genetics and amygdala-sensitivity and if you don't accept these facts you get in trouble.
    Excerpt from link:

    Genetic Behaviour
    Most people automatically assume that they are consciously responsible for their actions. Yet our instinctive (genetically engendered) belief in the supremacy of the rational brain demands an underlying bet that should seduce only the most demented of gamblers. It is generally conceded that there are somewhere between 10 and 100 million species inhabiting this planet. The best guess is currently around 20-30 million. It is also conceded that all of these species are shaped and driven by their genetic material. So, one exception in 20-30 million? Fat chance!
    The conscious ‘rational brain’, centred in the pre- frontal cortex, begins to fire up some 500 milliseconds later— after the board of genetic directors in the basement have had time to assess the incoming data for any concealed threats to their security and survival. If threats are implicit in the data, the parliament of genes overwhelms the rational brain with a flood of emotion and issues a set of directives for well-proven genetic behaviour.
    So emotion is the flag of genetic behaviour and signals that the rational brain has been bypassed in the interest of long-term genetic survival. If our Amygdala has been triggered, we react ‘instinctively’ with anger, lust or fear. If not, then we think and act ‘morally’—out of love, duty, or a sense of justice and compassion. Meanwhile the brain’s propaganda department patches together a reasoned explanation for that behaviour in order to maintain a reassuring facade of rational ‘free will’.

    http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/THOC/enigma_code.pdf

    , @John Trout
    @Fin of a cobra

    So the Jews are nuts, but it isn't survival they are looking for, they are looking for dominance.

    , @annamaria
    @Fin of a cobra


    Another one of the frat boy organizers, Brendan Rosenblum, has been working for the Simon Wiesenthal Center since 2022. ... several Zionist billionaires such as Bill Ackman have contributed large sums of money to the effort.
     
    Jewish tribal cohesion trumps decency and honesty any time. All major jewish organizations are staffed with people who are not loyal to the US and never were.

    The supposedly nazi-hunting Simon Wiesenthal Center has been a staunch supporter of the Ukrainian self-proclaimed Nazis, whom the pro-Nazi Simon Wiesenthal Center functionaries, as well as the thugs at ADL, call "freedom fighters against Russia." Swastika and star of david became tightly interwoven since 1990-s when Kagans and Wolfowitz included Banderites into signatories of PNAC -- a Straussian fascist manifesto of full-spectrum zionist dominance.

    "Zionist billionaires such as Bill Ackman" have not a single honorable bone in them: they are anti-human psychopaths obsessed with genocidal zeal and parasitic greed.

    Replies: @eah

    , @Fin of a cobra
    @Fin of a cobra

    Thanks for all the replies: @anonymous, @Wokechoke, @muh muh, @Bedford, @Anon, @Simon D, @Odd Rabbit, @John Trout. They all help, even when we don't agree. I think TUR has one of the best commentariat on the web: we are all helping each other sharpen our arguments as we search for the truth. I am reminded of Proverbs 27:17: "As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another."

    I am not proselytizing -- I know full well many have severe restrictions towards Christianity -- but what we have here at Unz is eerily similar to a small Bible group: we commentators are basically all "believers" who get together to talk about the most important question of our time -- The Jewish Question. To us, this belief is the touchstone against which analyses of most current events must be judged. And to find a place like this is so rare! Where else can we freely express our heretical beliefs? (So thanks again, Mr. Unz!)

    Now let's get back to my original comment to Striker's article. Above, I mention an fMRI study of the Asperger brain, in which the amygdala becomes overactive just by looking at a human face, regardless of the expression it is showing. In a previous comment, I observed the uncanny similarities between Aspie and Jewish traits, the latter described in Sombart's book on Jews. So I made an inference: if both Aspie and Jew have similar traits, they may have similar brains; and if their brains are similar, then the Jews' amygdalas will probably also become overactive when they see the face of another human being -- especially if the other is a non-Jew.

    What I should have done before writing the comment above is to investigate the most knowledgeable authority on The Jewish Question alive: Kevin MacDonald -- Kmac, the Pope of the JQ. I confess I didn't read his last book, probably because I was put off by the fact that the title doesn't reference Jews directly: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition. But now, taking a look at it, I find that MacDonald references fMRI studies on White reactions to Black faces, though unfortunately I didn't find anything about Jewish reactions. Here is the quote from MacDonald's book:


    In one study, subjects were shown photos of Blacks and Whites while hooked up to a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) machine that takes pictures of the brain in action. When the photos were shown for very brief periods—too short to be consciously processed, the fMRIs showed that Whites had a negative response to the photos of Blacks. This procedure therefore measures implicit negative attitudes toward Blacks.
     
    Looking up the paper Kmac references (going directly to the primary source is a must!), titled "Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces", this part of the abstract stands out: "... White participants viewed Black and White faces during event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. When the faces were presented for 30 ms, activation in the amygdala -- a brain region associated with emotion -- was greater for Black than for White faces."

    The amygdala of Whites become active when viewing the face of Blacks -- it's a spontaneous reaction of our primitive reptile brains. What these researchers were trying to prove, most probably, is the inherent neurological "racism" of Whites against blacks. That type of research fits in well with the Jewish War on Whites since time immemorial. But what about Jews themselves? How do the Jews react when they see a White face? Well, I doubt you're gonna see a lot of funding for that type of research. So we must rely on analogies, conjectures, and speculation in general.

    The study MacDonald has referenced in his book can be repurposed to serve as an analogy in place of the nonexistent research on the Jews: there is a high probability that the Jew, when looking at a White face, will react immediately (less than 30 milliseconds) and unconsciously to this exposure, and under an fMRI machine what you would see is an overactive amygdala. The results would probably be something like this: "Jewish participants viewed White and Jewish faces during event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). When the faces were presented for 30 ms, activation in the amygdala—a brain region linked with emotion—was notably higher for White than for Jewish faces."

    This would make perfect sense -- now all we have to do is find a few White or other Goy billionaires and convince them to finance an extensive study on the racist neurology of the Jewish brain.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @DogZ
    @Fin of a cobra

    The jews are NOT fighting for their lives you uneducated tool. The jews are mass murdering land grabbers. Bibi and co are currently hiding in a spider hole begging not to be arrested by ICC and ICJ for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

    The jews foolishly documented thousands of years of war crimes in the Old Testament. Read it, the jews are satan worshipping psychopaths.

    , @niceland
    @Fin of a cobra

    Few weeks ago I stumbled across a link to a book published in 1924. "You Gentiles" by Maurice Samuel. I wasn't interested enough to read all of it but I found the chapter "sports" quite interesting. It came to mind reading your comment, I think if you read the chapter you see what I mean.

    https://archive.org/details/yougentiles0000maur/page/38/mode/2up

    In my view this guy certainly hit some nails on the head about us gentiles and our societies in this chapter of the book. I nodded quite a bit when reading it. However I don't know if his description of Jews was correct a century ago or if it's now. Certainly Jews are hardly a mono-culture. Still this chapter is very interesting read in relations to current events.

    , @Treg
    @Fin of a cobra

    Hence, directly denial of their fears is everything.
    "Whats wrong Nathan?"

    "I --I cant go outside. There's bees outside. You know my great grandparents were swormed and murdered by bees."

    "There are no bees outside. Open the door, come outside. Its safe. Calm down, take a deep breath. Dont be a prisoner of your fears".

    "Ok.....What?-- WHAT was that! It flew right by my face!"

    "Oh that was just a fly"

    "Are you sure?"

    "Yes I am sure. But you know what? I saw the in 1957 they had put down many deaths, but years later, not so many."


    "You're not denying bees killed my grandparents!"

    "Are you saying you have perfect numbers? Where you there, keeping count of the bees? Was anyone doing that? Of course the Russians were liars and blamed the bees for everything after the war you know"

    "What are you saying????"

    "Im saying you have nothing to fear. Im saying that whatever bees there was long ago, are long since gone. Im saying if you are scared to walk out your front door, then its you with the problem"

  • @ANON
    It seems wise to be skeptical of any and all in-person protests in a context where your enemy controls the media. The Charlottesville protesters found this out the hard way.

    When your enemy controls the media and a fight/shitstorm erupts - no matter who provoked it - the media will always make their favored side look sympathetic.

    Given that Jews/Zionists control Western media I don't see how there's anything that can be gained by in-person protests. The best you can hope for is that nothing happens during your protest (and that it's thus ignored) because if something does happen - like if somebody's killed - the media will always portray it as the fault of the side that they dislike - even if the victim is someone from the side that they hate (like Ashli Babbitt).

    The general problem is that: The police and Jew-Antifa (or Jew-Zionists) will conspire to provoke a fight and then when someone on your side gets the shit beaten out of them (or killed) you will be blamed for the whole affair by the Jew-controlled media.

    It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation.

    Consequently, it might be better to focus on online activism, or, more ambitiously, to focus on building a fortune with which to buy up media, or to start a new social media app like TikTok with which to challenge the Jewish social media near-monopoly of Reddit, Facebook, Youtube, Breitbart, etc). Of course, even should you build or buy a media property you must then rely on the government not banning or nationalizing your business at the behest of a powerful ethnic mafia who feels that their media cartel is threatened by the competition. You apparently must also be willing to be subjected to the humiliating ritual of going on a tour of Israel and Auschwitz as Elon's been made to do.

    Fundamentally, we have a Jewish mafia problem. Consciousness of this fact, especially among elites, must be raised by one means or another.

    Related:
    https://www.unz.com/runz/gazacaust-placing-the-blame-where-it-belongs/#comment-6399721


    Btw, isn't it interesting how, after Charlottesville and the chants of "Jews will not replace us" the Jewish Biden administration, under the leadership of "Holocaust survivor" and Jew Alejandro Mayorkas, has worked triple time since inauguration day to replace white Christian Americans through mass Turd World immigration? The Jews are so spiteful and arrogant they now endeavor to demonstrate just how fast and hard they indeed *can* "replace" America's white Christian founding population. Seeing a group of powerless, working-class, white boys really got to these nasty rat-faced kikes didn't it?

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Odd Rabbit

    “Fundamentally, we have a Jewish mafia problem. Consciousness of this fact, especially among elites, must be raised by one means or another.”

    Henry Makow agrees:
    Excerpt from the link
    -Before Hijacking America, Zionists Hijacked US Jews
    Before Zionists took over the US government,
    they took over the American Jewish community
    and made it their instrument.
    They have suppressed the normal cultural/spiritual/political aspirations of US Jews and drafted them to their pernicious cause.

    They silenced Jewish attempts to define
    American Jewish life in non-Zionist terms.

    They believe Jews cannot coexist with non-Jews.

    The West is now complicit in Israel’s genocide and will suffer the consequences.

    “Today in America, Jewish culture and even Jewish religion have degenerated into ‘Jewish’ nationalism, and Jewish philanthropists, Jewish schools, Jewish segregated services, have been all subverted (with a few noble exceptions) into serving…the upbuilding of the ‘Jewish homeland’…Moshe Menuhin
    “Oh, my people! They who guide you lead you astray.” (Isaiah 3:12)

    In 1965, Moshe Menuhin, left, characterized American Jewish life in the following terms:

    “Today in America, Jewish culture and even Jewish religion has degenerated into ‘Jewish’ nationalism, and Jewish philanthropists, Jewish schools, Jewish segregated services, have been all subverted (with a few noble exceptions) into serving…the upbuilding of the ‘Jewish homeland’…(468)
    (A measure of this: Moshe Menuhin had to self-publish his book.)

    CONSEQUENCES
    My guess is that American Jewry is about evenly divided: half is alienated from all things Jewish; half is under the control of organized Jewry, i.e. the central banking cartel.

    https://henrymakow.com/zionists-are-the-worst-anti-semites.html

    • Thanks: Justrambling
  • The roots of the “Hitler-Controlled-Opposition” myth go back to the 1920s and 1930s in the circles of Hitler’s political rivals, namely the German and Soviet Communist Parties, the leftists of the West and the hard left faction of the National Socialist German Worker’s Party (NSDAP).[1] The intention was obviously to prevent Hitler and the NSDAP...
  • Malla says:
    @Malla
    @j2

    The The Grand Mufti, Amin al-Husseini told the Fuhrer of the Third Reich, Adolf Hitler that the Arab countries were firmly convinced that Germany would win the war and that the Arab cause would then prosper. He also told the Fuhrer that the Arabs were Germany’s natural friends because they had the same enemies as had Germany. Therefore, the Mufti said that the entire Arab World were prepared to cooperate with Germany with all their hearts and stood ready to participate in the war, not only negatively by the commission of acts of sabotage and the instigation of revolutions, but also positively by the formation of an Arab Legion. The Mufti assured Hitler that, the Arabs could be more useful to Germany as allies than might be apparent at first glance, both for geographical reasons and because of the suffering inflicted upon them by the British and the Jews. Furthermore, they had had close relations with all Muslim nations, of which they could make use in behalf of the common cause. The Arab Legion would be quite easy to raise. An appeal by the Mufti to the Arab countries and the prisoners of Arab, Algerian, Tunisian and Moroccan nationality in Germany would produce a great number of volunteers eager to fight. The Mufti told Hitler that the Arab world was firmly convinced of a German victory because, they believe that not only because the Reich possessed a large army, brave soldiers and military leaders of genius, but also because the Almighty could never award the victory to an unjust cause.
    In this struggle, the Mufti continued that the Arabs were striving for the independence and unity of Palestine, Syria and Iraq. They had the fullest confidence in the Fuhrer and looked to his hand for the balm on their wounds, which had been inflicted upon them by the enemies of Germany.
    The Mufti then mentioned the letter he had received from Germany, which stated that Germany was holding no Arab territories and understood and recognized the aspirations to independence and freedom of the Arabs, just as the German Third Reich supported the elimination of the Jewish national home.

    A public declaration in this sense would would rouse the Arabs from their momentary lethargy and give them new courage, according to the Mufti. It would also ease the Mufti’s work of secretly organizing the Arabs against the moment when they could strike. The Mufti gave the assurance that the Arabs would in strict discipline patiently wait for the right moment and only strike upon an order from Berlin. The Mufti also observed that France likewise would have no objections to the unification plan because it had conceded independence to Syria as early as 1936 and had given her approval to the unification of Iraq and Syria under King Faisal as early as 1933.

    Replies: @Malla

    The Fuhrer replied that Germany’s fundamental attitude on these questions, as the Mufti himself had already stated, was clear. Germany stood for uncompromising war against the Jews. That naturally included active opposition to the Jewish national home in Palestine, which was nothing other than a center, in the form of a state, for the exercise of destructive influence by Jewish interests. Germany was also aware that the assertion that the Jews were carrying out the functions of economic pioneers in Palestine was a lie. The work there was done only by the Arabs, not by the Jews.
    Hitler continued that Germany was at the present time engaged in a life and death struggle with two citadels of Jewish power: Great Britain and Soviet Russia. That theoretically there was a difference between England’s capitalism and Soviet Russia’s communism; actually, however, the Jews in both countries were pursuing a common goal. This was the decisive struggle, Hitler went on, on the political plane, that it presented itself in the main as a conflict between Germany and England, but ideologically it was a battle between National Socialism and the Jews. Hitler told the Mufti that it went without saying that Germany would furnish positive and practical aid to the Arabs involved in the same struggle, because platonic promises were useless in a war for survival or destruction in which the Jews were able to mobilize all of England’s power for their ends.
    According to the Fuhrer, the aid to the Arabs would have to be material aid. According to Hitler, Germany was engaged in very severe battles to force the gateway to the northern Caucasus region. The difficulties were mainly with regard to maintaining the supply, which was most difficult as a result of the destruction of railroads and highways as well as the oncoming winter. If at such a moment, the Fuhrer were to raise the problem of Syria in a declaration, those elements in France which were under de Gaulle’s influence would receive new strength. They would interpret the Fuhrer’s declaration as an intention to break up France’s colonial empire and appeal to their fellow countrymen that they should rather make common cause with the English to try to save what still could be saved. A German declaration regarding Syria would in France be understood to refer to the French colonies in general, and that would at the present time create new troubles in western Europe, which means that a portion of the German armed forces would be immobilized in the west and no longer be available for the campaign in the east.

    The Fuhrer then made the following statement to the Mufti, enjoining him to lock it in the uttermost depths of his heart:

    1. He (the Fuhrer) would carry on the battle to the total destruction of the Judeo-Communist empire in Europe.
    2. At some moment which was impossible to set exactly today but which in any event was not distant, the German armies would in the course of this struggle reach the southern exit from Caucasia.
    3. As soon as this had happened, the Fuhrer would on his own give the Arab world the assurance that its hour of liberation had arrived. Germany’s objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of British power. In that hour the Mufti would be the most authoritative spokesman for the Arab world. It would then be his task to set off the Arab operations, which he had secretly prepared. When that time had come, Germany could also be indifferent to French reaction to such a declaration.

    Once Germany had forced open the road to Iran and Iraq through Rostov; it would be also the beginning of the end of the British World Empire. He (the Fuhrer) hoped that the coming year would make it possible for Germany to thrust open the Caucasian gate to the Middle East. For the good of their common cause, it would be better if the Arab proclamation were put off for a few more months than if Germany were to create difficulties for herself without being able thereby to help the Arabs.

    He (the Fuhrer) fully appreciated the eagerness of the Arabs for a public declaration of the sort requested by the Grand Mufti. But he would beg him to consider that he (the Fuhrer) himself was the Chief of State of the German Reich for five long years during which he was unable to make to his own homeland the announcement of its liberation. He had to wait with that until the announcement could be made on the basis of a situation brought about by the force of arms that the Anschluss had been carried out.
    The moment that Germany’s tank divisions and air squadrons had made their appearance south of the Caucasus, the public appeal requested by the Grand Mufti could go out to the Arab world.

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @24th Alabama
    @Malla

    Compliments on your summary of Hitler's Mideast thinking. Hitler was a superior
    visionary, almost completely goal driven, but he lacked the logistical and management
    skills which are essential to military success.

    On the Southern Russia Front, the German thrust into the Caucasus from the West,
    simultaneous with supplying the Afrika Korps across the Mediterranean, was nothing
    short of supply chain insanity. There was no chance that the Germans
    would be of any help to the Grand Mufti, Al Husseini.

    Replies: @Malla

  • @j2
    @Odd Rabbit

    "Do you think that Degrelle was wrong? or made only propaganda. He seems to be honest and sincere in his article."

    It is difficult to say. I did not know Hitler, I did not know Degrelle. But I have one question, maybe you can answer it. Degrelle tells how Hitler kept his room and clothes tidy and washed himself. Therefore I find it strange that his teeth were in so terrible state as the X-rays and the tooth remains in Russia show. The teeth would not have been in such a state had he washed them regularly and he should have been abhorred by the very bad smell that the story says his mouth gave. I once tried to match Hitler's teeth in the few photos from around 1944 when his teeth are visible with the dental analysis. The claim is that he only had left five of his teeth, they were in the lower jaw, four in the middle, then on one side incisor that was crowned with gold, then an original tooth, and then golden teeth. The X-rays and the dental remains agree fully, but when I look at one photo where Hitler's lower teeth are visible, I count the four middle teeth, and I count three normal looking teeth where there should be only one original tooth and one fully golden tooth. Golden teeth normally look either darker or shine like metal. But these three teeth look just like the four middle teeth. So, as a summary: I do not know what man Hitler was, I do not know what man Degrelle was, and I do not know if the X-rays are from Hitler. But maybe you know.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Thanks a lot!!
    Luckily I understand humour. If you have more funny stories you could tell me more.
    It’s good to laugh, they say, laughter prolongs life.

    • Replies: @j2
    @Odd Rabbit

    "If you have more funny stories you could tell me more."

    I had to, you asked me to read the story by Degrelle. There are many histories of Hitler, who he was and who he was not, like this more main stream version;
    https://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/joins.htm

    But what matters is that Hitler was poor in mathematics in the school. About all these stories how Hitler was antisemitic at early age, I do not know. He did not show it before the army course for propaganda agents in 1919. I still do not think that a spy sent by army to spy a party (that maybe was suspected by the army to be communistic, or maybe was not as it was strongly anticommunistic) would join the party in any other role than that which he has been assigned by the army, be it an infiltrator or be it the long looked for leader for that party. Historians and people presenting their memories, like Degrelle, tell something, but the only way to find the truth is to use logical thinking (that is, mathematical thinking also called common sense). If something does not match, then it is not so. Something does not match in any of these histories of Hitler and history is just a story.

    Replies: @Obergefreiter, @Odd Rabbit

  • @j2
    @Commentator Mike

    Hitler and Goebbels did not much resemble to Aryan stereotype what Hitler supposedly wanted, which it a bit odd. But what is even more odd is that Hitler would not have passed the requirements that he imposed on Aryan Germans as he did not have four German grandparents, one of them not being known who he was. What kind of a man passes requirements to others and does not pass them himself? Not the fully honest type as some commenters here like to claim Hitler was. And this hairbrush of Eva Brown with mtDNA N1b. And this half-Jewish Dr. Theodor Morell who gave Hitler metamphetamine. Something does not match.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Malla

    Good observation.
    If you read this article of Leon Degrelle of Hitler so you get a different, a ‘non-msm’- picture of him. Do you think that Degrelle was wrong? or made only propaganda. He seems to be honest and sincere in his article.
    https://ihr.org/journal/v14n3p22_Degrelle.html

    In my opinion Hitler’s anti-semitism is understandable and rational since the zionists had destroyed Germany in ww1 and continued to do so after the war but many speculate that there are also psychological factors involved in his antisemitism, …for instance factors relating to his father’s ’mysterious genes’ which must have puzzled him and to which suspicions of Jewish origin have been attached.
    (It is worth remembering that Foreign Minister Lavrov has publicly expressed his suspicions about H’s Jewishness.)
    It’s difficult to deny that he was undoubtedly controlled and abused by ‘someone’ behind the curtain which H himself did not understand ? This ‘someone’ has been working in collaboration with H to create the State of Israel and ultimately destroy Germany and has not taken responsibility for the destruction of Germany.

    We must keep in mind that in ww2 the biggest power user in the end was London and the ’Talmud-mafia’ of the R-sild. It’s difficult to shut the eyes from this fact. Both world wars have served the zionist project and its ultimate goal: subjugate the whole world into zionist rule.

    • Agree: j2
    • Troll: Trinity
    • Replies: @j2
    @Odd Rabbit

    "Do you think that Degrelle was wrong? or made only propaganda. He seems to be honest and sincere in his article."

    It is difficult to say. I did not know Hitler, I did not know Degrelle. But I have one question, maybe you can answer it. Degrelle tells how Hitler kept his room and clothes tidy and washed himself. Therefore I find it strange that his teeth were in so terrible state as the X-rays and the tooth remains in Russia show. The teeth would not have been in such a state had he washed them regularly and he should have been abhorred by the very bad smell that the story says his mouth gave. I once tried to match Hitler's teeth in the few photos from around 1944 when his teeth are visible with the dental analysis. The claim is that he only had left five of his teeth, they were in the lower jaw, four in the middle, then on one side incisor that was crowned with gold, then an original tooth, and then golden teeth. The X-rays and the dental remains agree fully, but when I look at one photo where Hitler's lower teeth are visible, I count the four middle teeth, and I count three normal looking teeth where there should be only one original tooth and one fully golden tooth. Golden teeth normally look either darker or shine like metal. But these three teeth look just like the four middle teeth. So, as a summary: I do not know what man Hitler was, I do not know what man Degrelle was, and I do not know if the X-rays are from Hitler. But maybe you know.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

  • @Fin of a cobra
    @Odd Rabbit

    Hey Rabbit -- Sorry, but I haven't found anyone as "authoritative" as Michael Fitzgerald willing to diagnose Hitler with Asperger's (or "autistic", which I don't like to use as much). There is, however, a page on Wikipedia on the Psychopathography of Adolf Hitler, which you might be interested in. Here is the link and a short quote:


    Autism spectrum disorder: Michael Fitzgerald (2004)
    ... Fitzgerald appraised many of Hitler's publicly known traits as autistic, particularly his various fixations, his lifeless gaze, his social awkwardness, his lack of personal friendships, and his tendency toward monologue-like speeches, which, according to Fitzgerald, resulted from an inability to have real conversations.[43]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathography_of_Adolf_Hitler
     
    There is also an interesting analysis on Quora, which I'll put below the "more" tab. Here is a summary of some of Hitler's traits the author points out:

    ranting; rigidly stuck to certain topics; black and white in thought; refused to compromise; lecture incessantly despite listeners' lack of interest; few friends; obsessions (Wagnerian opera, Germanic culture, ancient battles); moodiness and arrogance; starring into people’s eyes as if through them; eye contact in an unnatural way; extremely logical; emotions cut out; liked solitude; didn’t need companionship; being solitary is a hallmark of autism; probably asexual...
    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-people-with-autism-still-have-rights-if-Adolf-Hitler-was-autistic
     
    Is it possible that Adolf Hitler had an Asperger’s syndrome?

    Yes, despite what many would like to believe for their own personal reasons, Adolf Hitler likely had what was once known as Asperger’s syndrome.

    Hitler was likely at the high functioning end of Aspergers and likely also suffered from Narcissistic Personality Disorder. It has been noted by many in the field of psychiatry that NPD is highly common among those on the spectrum. Conduct disorder(which involves lying, conning, stealing, vandalism, rebelling against authority, aggression, running away from home) is also something that has been recorded as cooccurring with Aspergers in a subset of those with the disorder. Hitler likely had conduct disorder as a young boy but grew up to develop malignant NPD.

    Many are confused about people on the spectrum and believe that because they themselves or a friend or relative is one way that all on the spectrum are the same in personality or handicaps. The plain truth that any psychologist will tell you is no two on the spectrum are the same in clinical presentation or even in personality. Just because one person on the spectrum, or many, are incapable of manipulation doesn’t mean that some on the spectrum can’t learn to manipulate. It’s been documented that many in fact can learn that very thing to the shock of those who had known them to be so honest as children. Just because many on the spectrum develop social anxiety from being bullied doesn’t mean all people with Aspergers are introverts. It’s not a black and white reality to this topic.

    As for Adolf Hitler, likely others who have answered in the negative have not read a single biography of the man, otherwise they would have recognized many traits common to Aspergers in him.

    Hitler was famous for his ranting. It’s what got him the position that lead to his joining the National socialist. It seems he could not converse in a conversational manner. He was obsessed with a few topics and rigidly stuck to them in conversation. He was very black and white in the way he thought and would refuse to compromise in an argument even when it was apparent that his ideas were wrong just as many on the spectrum do. He would not converse with another but rather lecture incessantly despite the listeners lack of interest which he could not seem to recognize or perhaps care to acknowledge.

    Hitler had few friends growing up, only one friend was able to tolerate his long rants, obsessions with Wagnerian opera Germanic culture and ancient battles, and his moodiness and arrogance. In the end Hitler allowed this friendship to fizzle out and could not sustain it. Hitler was a painter and was skilled at depicting architecture but not so much human beings who it is claimed lacked emotion when he painted them as if he himself couldn’t see it. He lived as a bum on the streets in a depressive state when his fantasy of becoming a great artist wasn’t realized.

    It wasn’t until after world war 1 when as a solider with the task of discouraging his comrades from joining communism that he was sent to take lessons on how to give public talks and manipulate crowds that his ambition to become a politician came about, as well as his obsession with getting rid of the Jewish people. Hitler had a habit of starring into people’s eyes as if he was seeing through them. While many on the spectrum can’t make eye contact some are noted to do like Hitler and force eye contact in an unnatural way that seems odd to the onlooker.

    Hitler was also very peculiar about certain things such as he would not tolerate bouquets because of the thought that they were decaying. He hated the thought of decay. He could not understand the emotional function of dancing at parties and believed it was nonsensical. In other words like someone on the spectrum he was extremely logical in his thinking to the point that emotions were cut out as if he could not see them.

    Hitler was also famous for claiming he liked solitude and didn’t need companionship. He said this repeatedly. It was one of the selling points for the German people surprisingly because at the time it was believed to be the mark of a mythically heroic character. Being solitary is a hallmark of autism.

    like many on the spectrum as well it seems Hitler was probably asexual with very little drive to be intimate with his partners. For this he received an early form of testosterone therapy.

    Hitler’s father himself was known to be difficult, quick to anger, and to be unconventional in his ideas on social norms and etiquette. It’s likely Hitler inherited Aspergers from his father.

    Of course being on the spectrum doesn’t mean you’re like Adolf Hitler, but it doesn’t mean Adolf Hitler wasn’t on the spectrum.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-people-with-autism-still-have-rights-if-Adolf-Hitler-was-autistic

    Replies: @El_Kabong, @Odd Rabbit

    Thanks a lot, …cobra!
    Here some my own thoughts:
    I have searched the reasons of his behavior from genes and psychology. In my opinion he did not act rationally in the way Germans usually do.
    Many of his actions more resemble ‘creative destruction’, the doctrine of the zionists, and the kabbalists described by Makow which cannot be explained by reason alone when it has a strong biblical/talmudic basis.
    Nor can he be explained by psychopathy – as Laurent Guyenot says in one of his article: Netanyahu is a victim of the ‘biblical virus’, not a psychopath …and by analogy H would have been a victim of the ‘national socialism virus’ and not a psychopath who only destroys others.
    He was clearly trying to create a better world in which the zionists could not control the destiny of Germany and Europe and it seems that this was an absolute or a ‘holy’ goal for him, a goal to which he devoted completely and which guided his actions in showing the way for others.
    I can see that all this suits good to the Aspi-theory you have described.

    The book of Leon Degrelle also supports the Aspi-theory and gives no hints of psychopathy. It’s important to understand this big difference.
    https://ihr.org/journal/v14n3p22_Degrelle.html

  • @Fin of a cobra
    There is a great probability that Hitler -- like Woodrow Wilson and Richard Nixon -- suffered from Asperger's Syndrome (AS). This is a hypothesis proposed by Michael Fitzgerald, a psychiatrist who diagnosed more than 5,000 individuals with Asperger's. I'll put the links to Fitzgerald's papers on each of these men below. If this is true, it means that many of the tragic events of the 20th century may have been influenced by "Aspies", given that the decisions of the three politicians mentioned were crucial for their occurence.

    Lacking in social skills, Aspies may be more vulnerable to manipulation -- and all three can be said to have been cunningly taken advantage of by the Jews. After his presidency, Wilson supposedly regretted having signed the Federal Reserve Act into law -- a tragic event that gave the Jews even more leverage than they already had to start future wars and spread general mayhem and chaos throughout the world. Nixon was very suspicious of the Jews and talked about it with Billy Graham, a conversation which was caught on tape -- and he might have been forced by the Jews to take the US off the gold standard. Hitler was obviously obsessed by Jews, an obsession frequently shown by other Aspies (such as Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, and Bobby Fischer).

    Hitler had several other obsessions, which may be likened to Aspies' "special interests", one of which was "Lebensraum". This fixation to an ideological position is another trait common in AS, which might have led Hitler to adhere to a rigid principle instead of adapting to the theater of war as it unfolded -- as was the case in the doomed invasion of the Soviet Union. Hitler seemed to be caught up in an autistic rigidity loop, insisting on continuing several doubtful tactics despite the accumulated evidence that they would lead to defeat.

    Perhaps Aspies are natural "controlled opposition": they are more easily manipulated and may not have the skills necessary to notice that they are being manipulated -- making them an unconscious and unwitting controlled opposition. Hitler might fit into that category. Below the more tab, some links and an analysis of Hitler as Aspie, by Michael Fitzgerald:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360550667_Richard_Nixon_politician_with_autism_spectrum_disorder

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361546662_Woodrow_Wilson_Neurodevelopmental_disorders_including_specific_learning_disability_and_autism_with_dismissal_of_oedipal_issues

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353325370_Napoleon_Hitler_Dictators_Psychopathy_and_autistic_psychopathy

    From Autism and Creativity, by Michael Fitzgerald:

    – “Many of Hitler’s traits seem very autistic.”

    – “Adolf Hitler meets the criteria for autistic psychopathy described by Hans Asperger.”

    – “He was a poor sleeper and had food fads. He recoiled from physical contact, was unable to forge genuine friendships, and showed an emptiness in his human relations. His conversations in the Men’s Home in Vienna were really harangues and invited no reciprocity, for which he lacked the capacity.”

    – “In Munich he was distant, self-contained, withdrawn and without friends. His comrades noted that he had no humanitarian feelings.”

    – “He was extremely socially awkward and uncertain in small groups. He showed little human interest in his followers, and even one of his leading supporters accused him of ‘contempt for mankind’.”

    – “A colleague, Gregor Strasser, thought that there was ‘something other-worldly about Hitler…a lack of knowledge of human beings and with it a lack of sound judgement of them…he lived without any bonds to another human being’.”

    – “His poor adaptation to people was perhaps most obvious in his relations with women. During his life he took only a slight interest in a couple of women. One was his niece, Geli Raubal, who effectively became his prisoner and said ‘my uncle is a monster’; she apparently committed suicide in his apartment. His second relationship was with Eva Braun, who apparently attempted suicide by shooting in 1932 and died with him in the bunker in 1945.”

    – “His colleagues regarded him as a remote figure: he was an obsessive, and obsessives rarely make good or interesting company, except in the eyes of those who share the obsession or those in awe of, or dependent on, such an unbalanced personality. He was single-minded and inflexible.”

    – “He spent a great deal of time with Albert Speer, examining architectural plans, and this remained a major focus throughout his life. His other major interest was in the music of Wagner.”

    – “His greatest interest, clearly, was in control over people and power over people. His ability to achieve this control and power was extraordinary.”

    – “Hitler had ‘a bed compulsion, which demands that the bed be made in a particular way with the quilt folded according to a prescribed pattern and that a man must make the bed before he could go to sleep’.”

    – “Hitler did not use language for the purpose of interaction with others, but only for the purpose of dominating others. He endlessly engaged in long-winded, pedantic speeches, with ‘illogical arguments full of crude comparisons and cheap allusions’.”

    – “After the First World War ‘his awkward mannerisms’ were noted.”

    – From Fitzgerald’s paper: “Hitler was a typical person with high functioning autism, (Fitzgerald, 2004). He was a typical criminal autistic psychopath, (Fitzgerald, 2010, 2015). Hitler was enigmatic and contradictory. He had poor social reciprocal relationships, was remote, obsessive – compulsive, had narrow interests, autistic charisma, pragmatic language issues, unusual tone of voice, awkward mannerisms, unusual gait and a peculiar diet, (Fitzgerald, 2016).

    Replies: @Joe Paluka, @HdC, @Suetonious, @Curmudgeon, @Patrick McNally, @Odd Rabbit

    Hi …cobra! I asked you 5 days ago elsewhere: Have you found anything else?.. you promised post to me. I’m still waiting if you have something new for me. The enigma of Hitler intrigues me so much after reading the article of Leon Degrelle …I would like to get nearer the truth…
    On the Origins and Mechanism of Jewish Power
    A Sombartian Analysis
    ERIC STRIKER

    I have wondered and pondered about the megalomania and warfare of Hitler. Why was the crusade against the communists so important and transcendent to him, an all-or-nothing affair? Why was he unable to contain and control it in any meaningful way, but took sole responsibility and allowed it to ultimately destroy himself and his own people? That is the crux of it all.

    Now I get it. You write in your interesting comment:
    This fixation to an ideological position is another trait common in AS, which might have led Hitler to adhere to a rigid principle instead of adapting to the theater of war as it unfolded — as was the case in the doomed invasion of the Soviet Union. Hitler seemed to be caught up in an autistic rigidity loop, insisting on continuing several doubtful tactics despite the accumulated evidence that they would lead to defeat.
    Thanks.

    • Replies: @Fin of a cobra
    @Odd Rabbit

    Hey Rabbit -- Sorry, but I haven't found anyone as "authoritative" as Michael Fitzgerald willing to diagnose Hitler with Asperger's (or "autistic", which I don't like to use as much). There is, however, a page on Wikipedia on the Psychopathography of Adolf Hitler, which you might be interested in. Here is the link and a short quote:


    Autism spectrum disorder: Michael Fitzgerald (2004)
    ... Fitzgerald appraised many of Hitler's publicly known traits as autistic, particularly his various fixations, his lifeless gaze, his social awkwardness, his lack of personal friendships, and his tendency toward monologue-like speeches, which, according to Fitzgerald, resulted from an inability to have real conversations.[43]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathography_of_Adolf_Hitler
     
    There is also an interesting analysis on Quora, which I'll put below the "more" tab. Here is a summary of some of Hitler's traits the author points out:

    ranting; rigidly stuck to certain topics; black and white in thought; refused to compromise; lecture incessantly despite listeners' lack of interest; few friends; obsessions (Wagnerian opera, Germanic culture, ancient battles); moodiness and arrogance; starring into people’s eyes as if through them; eye contact in an unnatural way; extremely logical; emotions cut out; liked solitude; didn’t need companionship; being solitary is a hallmark of autism; probably asexual...
    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-people-with-autism-still-have-rights-if-Adolf-Hitler-was-autistic
     
    Is it possible that Adolf Hitler had an Asperger’s syndrome?

    Yes, despite what many would like to believe for their own personal reasons, Adolf Hitler likely had what was once known as Asperger’s syndrome.

    Hitler was likely at the high functioning end of Aspergers and likely also suffered from Narcissistic Personality Disorder. It has been noted by many in the field of psychiatry that NPD is highly common among those on the spectrum. Conduct disorder(which involves lying, conning, stealing, vandalism, rebelling against authority, aggression, running away from home) is also something that has been recorded as cooccurring with Aspergers in a subset of those with the disorder. Hitler likely had conduct disorder as a young boy but grew up to develop malignant NPD.

    Many are confused about people on the spectrum and believe that because they themselves or a friend or relative is one way that all on the spectrum are the same in personality or handicaps. The plain truth that any psychologist will tell you is no two on the spectrum are the same in clinical presentation or even in personality. Just because one person on the spectrum, or many, are incapable of manipulation doesn’t mean that some on the spectrum can’t learn to manipulate. It’s been documented that many in fact can learn that very thing to the shock of those who had known them to be so honest as children. Just because many on the spectrum develop social anxiety from being bullied doesn’t mean all people with Aspergers are introverts. It’s not a black and white reality to this topic.

    As for Adolf Hitler, likely others who have answered in the negative have not read a single biography of the man, otherwise they would have recognized many traits common to Aspergers in him.

    Hitler was famous for his ranting. It’s what got him the position that lead to his joining the National socialist. It seems he could not converse in a conversational manner. He was obsessed with a few topics and rigidly stuck to them in conversation. He was very black and white in the way he thought and would refuse to compromise in an argument even when it was apparent that his ideas were wrong just as many on the spectrum do. He would not converse with another but rather lecture incessantly despite the listeners lack of interest which he could not seem to recognize or perhaps care to acknowledge.

    Hitler had few friends growing up, only one friend was able to tolerate his long rants, obsessions with Wagnerian opera Germanic culture and ancient battles, and his moodiness and arrogance. In the end Hitler allowed this friendship to fizzle out and could not sustain it. Hitler was a painter and was skilled at depicting architecture but not so much human beings who it is claimed lacked emotion when he painted them as if he himself couldn’t see it. He lived as a bum on the streets in a depressive state when his fantasy of becoming a great artist wasn’t realized.

    It wasn’t until after world war 1 when as a solider with the task of discouraging his comrades from joining communism that he was sent to take lessons on how to give public talks and manipulate crowds that his ambition to become a politician came about, as well as his obsession with getting rid of the Jewish people. Hitler had a habit of starring into people’s eyes as if he was seeing through them. While many on the spectrum can’t make eye contact some are noted to do like Hitler and force eye contact in an unnatural way that seems odd to the onlooker.

    Hitler was also very peculiar about certain things such as he would not tolerate bouquets because of the thought that they were decaying. He hated the thought of decay. He could not understand the emotional function of dancing at parties and believed it was nonsensical. In other words like someone on the spectrum he was extremely logical in his thinking to the point that emotions were cut out as if he could not see them.

    Hitler was also famous for claiming he liked solitude and didn’t need companionship. He said this repeatedly. It was one of the selling points for the German people surprisingly because at the time it was believed to be the mark of a mythically heroic character. Being solitary is a hallmark of autism.

    like many on the spectrum as well it seems Hitler was probably asexual with very little drive to be intimate with his partners. For this he received an early form of testosterone therapy.

    Hitler’s father himself was known to be difficult, quick to anger, and to be unconventional in his ideas on social norms and etiquette. It’s likely Hitler inherited Aspergers from his father.

    Of course being on the spectrum doesn’t mean you’re like Adolf Hitler, but it doesn’t mean Adolf Hitler wasn’t on the spectrum.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-people-with-autism-still-have-rights-if-Adolf-Hitler-was-autistic

    Replies: @El_Kabong, @Odd Rabbit

  • There is a great probability that Hitler — like Woodrow Wilson and Richard Nixon — suffered from Asperger’s Syndrome (AS). This is a hypothesis proposed by Michael Fitzgerald, a psychiatrist who diagnosed more than 5,000 individuals with Asperger’s. I’ll put the links to Fitzgerald’s papers on each of these men below. If this is true, it means that many of the tragic events of the 20th century may have been influenced by “Aspies”, given that the decisions of the three politicians mentioned were crucial for their occurence.

    Lacking in social skills, Aspies may be more vulnerable to manipulation — and all three can be said to have been cunningly taken advantage of by the Jews. After his presidency, Wilson supposedly regretted having signed the Federal Reserve Act into law — a tragic event that gave the Jews even more leverage than they already had to start future wars and spread general mayhem and chaos throughout the world. Nixon was very suspicious of the Jews and talked about it with Billy Graham, a conversation which was caught on tape — and he might have been forced by the Jews to take the US off the gold standard. Hitler was obviously obsessed by Jews, an obsession frequently shown by other Aspies (such as Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, and Bobby Fischer).

    Hitler had several other obsessions, which may be likened to Aspies’ “special interests”, one of which was “Lebensraum”. This fixation to an ideological position is another trait common in AS, which might have led Hitler to adhere to a rigid principle instead of adapting to the theater of war as it unfolded — as was the case in the doomed invasion of the Soviet Union. Hitler seemed to be caught up in an autistic rigidity loop, insisting on continuing several doubtful tactics despite the accumulated evidence that they would lead to defeat.

    Perhaps Aspies are natural “controlled opposition”: they are more easily manipulated and may not have the skills necessary to notice that they are being manipulated — making them an unconscious and unwitting controlled opposition. Hitler might fit into that category. Below the more tab, some links and an analysis of Hitler as Aspie, by Michael Fitzgerald:

    [MORE]
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360550667_Richard_Nixon_politician_with_autism_spectrum_disorder

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361546662_Woodrow_Wilson_Neurodevelopmental_disorders_including_specific_learning_disability_and_autism_with_dismissal_of_oedipal_issues

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353325370_Napoleon_Hitler_Dictators_Psychopathy_and_autistic_psychopathy

    From Autism and Creativity, by Michael Fitzgerald:

    – “Many of Hitler’s traits seem very autistic.”

    – “Adolf Hitler meets the criteria for autistic psychopathy described by Hans Asperger.”

    – “He was a poor sleeper and had food fads. He recoiled from physical contact, was unable to forge genuine friendships, and showed an emptiness in his human relations. His conversations in the Men’s Home in Vienna were really harangues and invited no reciprocity, for which he lacked the capacity.”

    – “In Munich he was distant, self-contained, withdrawn and without friends. His comrades noted that he had no humanitarian feelings.”

    – “He was extremely socially awkward and uncertain in small groups. He showed little human interest in his followers, and even one of his leading supporters accused him of ‘contempt for mankind’.”

    – “A colleague, Gregor Strasser, thought that there was ‘something other-worldly about Hitler…a lack of knowledge of human beings and with it a lack of sound judgement of them…he lived without any bonds to another human being’.”

    – “His poor adaptation to people was perhaps most obvious in his relations with women. During his life he took only a slight interest in a couple of women. One was his niece, Geli Raubal, who effectively became his prisoner and said ‘my uncle is a monster’; she apparently committed suicide in his apartment. His second relationship was with Eva Braun, who apparently attempted suicide by shooting in 1932 and died with him in the bunker in 1945.”

    – “His colleagues regarded him as a remote figure: he was an obsessive, and obsessives rarely make good or interesting company, except in the eyes of those who share the obsession or those in awe of, or dependent on, such an unbalanced personality. He was single-minded and inflexible.”

    – “He spent a great deal of time with Albert Speer, examining architectural plans, and this remained a major focus throughout his life. His other major interest was in the music of Wagner.”

    – “His greatest interest, clearly, was in control over people and power over people. His ability to achieve this control and power was extraordinary.”

    – “Hitler had ‘a bed compulsion, which demands that the bed be made in a particular way with the quilt folded according to a prescribed pattern and that a man must make the bed before he could go to sleep’.”

    – “Hitler did not use language for the purpose of interaction with others, but only for the purpose of dominating others. He endlessly engaged in long-winded, pedantic speeches, with ‘illogical arguments full of crude comparisons and cheap allusions’.”

    – “After the First World War ‘his awkward mannerisms’ were noted.”

    – From Fitzgerald’s paper: “Hitler was a typical person with high functioning autism, (Fitzgerald, 2004). He was a typical criminal autistic psychopath, (Fitzgerald, 2010, 2015). Hitler was enigmatic and contradictory. He had poor social reciprocal relationships, was remote, obsessive – compulsive, had narrow interests, autistic charisma, pragmatic language issues, unusual tone of voice, awkward mannerisms, unusual gait and a peculiar diet, (Fitzgerald, 2016).

    • Thanks: Brás Cubas, Odd Rabbit
    • LOL: Trinity, 24th Alabama
    • Troll: annacat, Santoculto
    • Replies: @Joe Paluka
    @Fin of a cobra

    I've never heard that Hitler had awkward social skills like an "Aspie". I've read that people said he was very charming on a personal level and had great charisma. He was very kind to animals and children, this is completely at odds with the "Hogan's Heroes Nazi" that we've been force fed over the past 60 years.

    Replies: @Fin of a cobra

    , @HdC
    @Fin of a cobra

    Suggest you read The Chief Culprit and Icebreaker, both by Viktor Suvorov.

    This nonsense of Germany baaad, allies and commies goood, is wearing thin. Recent history has demonstrated once and for all who the bad guys really are.

    And it ain't Germany!

    As an ancient proverb would have it: "The leopard cannot change his spots.

    Replies: @Fin of a cobra

    , @Suetonious
    @Fin of a cobra

    Gonna have to disagree with your Hitler and Aspergers thesis. This has also been said about Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, and they are effective upper-level managers, but they cannot articulate a vision and change the course of history. The ability to alter the flow of events from their normal course is known as agency. Hitler was able to do this with nothing more than the power of his words. Since his time, a concerted effort has been made to create a population with little agency, dumbed-down and concerned about who puts what in which hole.

    In this way, the-powers-that-be steer world events, without the threat of the rise of a high-agency individual (ie a "new Hitler"). Such agency is just not possible for an aspie. Also, check out the beginning of this video, in which an elderly German man and former soldier says that the greatest experience of his life was making eye contact with the Fuhrer

    Replies: @Fin of a cobra

    , @Curmudgeon
    @Fin of a cobra

    It has become common, particularly in the US, for psychiatrists to "diagnose" people whom they have not examined. This used to be a cause for being de-registered for clinical malfeasance.
    Virtually all of us write differently than we speak. Virtually all of us speak and behave differently in public than we do in private. I suspect most speak differently to medical professionals than others. This horseshit of people, like Fitzgerald, who was born after Hitler died; lived in a different era; different culture; and had massively different life experiences than Hitler, providing a diagnosis is pure speculation, at best.
    I had family members with psychiatric problems. Psychiatry doesn't "cure" anyone and is a fraud. How else can homosexuality and gender dysphoria be mental illnesses one day and "normal" the next with no scientific evidence to warrant the change.

    , @Patrick McNally
    @Fin of a cobra

    > Wilson supposedly regretted having signed the Federal Reserve Act into law

    That's an old fake quote.

    https://mythdetector.ge/en/a-fake-facebook-account-posts-a-spurious-woodrow-wilson-quote/

    -----
    The post shared by Lasha Modebadze is the fabrication of Woodrow Wilson’s words. A portion of the quote wase never said by Woodrow Wilson while other portions are taken from various chapters of the book published in 1913 and have nothing to do with the Federal Reserve System. The book had been published before Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act.
    -----

    , @Odd Rabbit
    @Fin of a cobra

    Hi ...cobra! I asked you 5 days ago elsewhere: Have you found anything else?.. you promised post to me. I’m still waiting if you have something new for me. The enigma of Hitler intrigues me so much after reading the article of Leon Degrelle …I would like to get nearer the truth…
    On the Origins and Mechanism of Jewish Power
    A Sombartian Analysis
    ERIC STRIKER

    I have wondered and pondered about the megalomania and warfare of Hitler. Why was the crusade against the communists so important and transcendent to him, an all-or-nothing affair? Why was he unable to contain and control it in any meaningful way, but took sole responsibility and allowed it to ultimately destroy himself and his own people? That is the crux of it all.

    Now I get it. You write in your interesting comment:
    This fixation to an ideological position is another trait common in AS, which might have led Hitler to adhere to a rigid principle instead of adapting to the theater of war as it unfolded — as was the case in the doomed invasion of the Soviet Union. Hitler seemed to be caught up in an autistic rigidity loop, insisting on continuing several doubtful tactics despite the accumulated evidence that they would lead to defeat.
    Thanks.

    Replies: @Fin of a cobra

  • @Suetonious
    @Fin of a cobra

    Gonna have to disagree with your Hitler and Aspergers thesis. This has also been said about Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, and they are effective upper-level managers, but they cannot articulate a vision and change the course of history. The ability to alter the flow of events from their normal course is known as agency. Hitler was able to do this with nothing more than the power of his words. Since his time, a concerted effort has been made to create a population with little agency, dumbed-down and concerned about who puts what in which hole.

    In this way, the-powers-that-be steer world events, without the threat of the rise of a high-agency individual (ie a "new Hitler"). Such agency is just not possible for an aspie. Also, check out the beginning of this video, in which an elderly German man and former soldier says that the greatest experience of his life was making eye contact with the Fuhrer

    Replies: @Fin of a cobra

    Gonna have to disagree with your Hitler and Aspergers thesis.

    Thanks for your considerate reply — even though you disagree with me (and you’re not the only one!). There’s a lot to unpack, even in such a short comment, so let’s start at the very end, when you write the following: “check out the beginning of this video, in which an elderly German man and former soldier says that the greatest experience of his life was making eye contact with the Fuhrer.”

    I’m not trying to be facetious or aggressive or disrespectful, but rather just stating a plain fact, so please don’t take this the wrong way: as Unz like to say, you scored an “own goal” with this remark (also see my comment above, in which I say basically the same thing to a fellow commenter who pointed to Hitler’s kindness to children and animals as evidence he wasn’t an Aspie — although, on the contrary, those are typical Aspie qualities). To try to prove this, I’ve transcribed what Fridolin von Spaun said in the video you linked:

    Suddenly I noticed Hitler’s eyes resting upon me. And that was one of the most curious moments of my life. I had the feeling that he was searching somehow — the gaze which at first rested completely on me suddenly went straight through me and into an unknown distance. It was so strange.

    What Hitler was actually demonstrating was what could be called an “Aspie gaze”: instead of connecting to the individual via direct eye contact — which most Aspies have a lot of trouble with — Hitler looked “through” von Spaun. The English subtitles are probably not even that accurate, because that elderly gentleman repeats the word “durch” at least twice, whereas the subtitles include only one instance of “through”. (I have a great friend, who is German, staying with me here in Brazil and he confirmed my observation — and he also mentioned that von Spaun has a “southern” accent, perhaps from Austria.)

    What I’m saying is that, far from proving your own point — that Hitler wasn’t an Aspie — what the video you linked does is the exact opposite, that is, it corroborates Fitzgerald’s theory that Hitler was, indeed, an Aspie (and thus the “own goal”). Here is a quote from an article titled “Atypical eye contact in autism”: “An atypical pattern of eye contact behaviour is one of the most significant symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).” Well, von Spaun didn’t call Hitler’s gaze “atypical”, but rather “sonderbar”, that is, “peculiar”, “odd” or “strange”, which amounts to the same thing.

    As for Aspies lacking agency (“Such agency is just not possible for an aspie”), sorry, but nothing could be further from the truth. When Aspies lock into their “special interest” and start “hyperfocusing”, there is little that can hold them back. There are countless examples of this and I will argue that great part of our worldview was determined by famous Aspies: Newton, Carolus Linneaus (taxonomy), Mendel (genetics), Mendeleev (periodic table), Pavlov (conditioned response), Darwin, Freud, Jung, Einstein and Godel, to name a few. Certainly, all these men had not only mere “agency”, but had so much of it that they were able to shape the very ideas that circulate in our head (much as the Jews do with the media). If anyone doesn’t have “high agency” it would have to be most neurotypicals, who depend on the Aspies for much of how they think.

    Since you mention Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, I might as well mention another famous Aspie: Steve Jobs — perhaps the quintessential example of a person with high agency. See Michael Fitzgerald’s article, “Steve Jobs: genius on the spectrum”. Like Hitler, Jobs had “visionary leadership”, which means he had a vision for what he thought the future of technology should look like. He didn’t just foresee some trends, he actually shaped what the future ended up looking like. Let’s call it hyper-agency! Anyway, I could go on and on about this topic — how Aspies influenced history and our very thoughts — which I think is fascinating and could reshape the way we view 20th century history and our understanding of the overall history of humanity itself.

    • Agree: Suetonious
    • Thanks: anarchyst, Odd Rabbit
  • @Fin of a cobra
    @Joe Paluka


    [Hitler] was very charming on a personal level and had great charisma. He was very kind to animals and children
     
    Thanks for your reply -- even though you don't agree with this argument. Admittedly, it does sound ridiculous at first, thus the couple of "LOL" and even a "Troll" my comment received. Unlike those labels, your brief comment does help further the dialogue, though it unintentionally corroborates Michael Fitzgerald's "Hitler as Aspie" theory; in other words, as Unz likes to say, you might have scored an "own goal". This is because you brought up a couple of elements that Fitzgerald himself didn't point out in his analysis: Hitler's kindness to animals and children.

    That is typical Aspie behavior, as can be ascertained in these quotes below from one of the foremost experts in the world in Asperger's Syndrome (AS), Tony Attwood (in his "Complete Guide to AS").

    Animals as friends -- Animals identify with, and feel relaxed in the company of, a non-predator (the person with Asperger’s syndrome), and pets can be a source of comfort and reassurance.... children and adults with Asperger’s syndrome are sometimes more able to perceive and have compassion for the perspective of animals than humans.
    ...
    Adults with Asperger’s syndrome can enjoy and benefit emotionally from voluntary work, particularly with the elderly, very young children and animals.
     
    As for your point on "charisma", it also corroborates one of Fitzgerald's major arguments in favor of Hitler having Asperger's, what he calls it "autistic charisma". This is also prevalent in many Aspies, as can be seen in figures like Sir Anthony Hopkins. Here is Attwood again (this time on his website):

    ...teens with PDA [a sub-type of autism] often show positive personality qualities including having charisma, a good sense of humour and are often considered likeable, chatty and fun to be with when not asked to comply with a request.
     
    Another element that only strengthens Fitzgerald's arguments is the fact that Hitler very seldom, if ever, painted portraits of people during the time he aspired to be an artist and even later. This is also a typical aspect of an Aspie, as described by Attwood in his book cited above:

    ...the scrapbook illustrates the pleasures in the person’s life, which may not always be those more conventional pleasures of typical children or adults. I have noted that adults with Asperger’s syndrome often include pictures in their pleasures book but the pictures are usually of scenes and animals without the presence of people. Other interests can be drawing, often based on a particular theme... [Hitler painted buildings]
     
    There are many other quotes in Attwood's book that seem to corroborate Fitzgerald's theory that Hitler had Asperger's Syndrome, but I'll transcribe only one more:

    A lack of ability in social play with peers and in interactions with adults can result in the development of behaviours to achieve dominance and control in a social context; these include the use of intimidation, and an arrogant and inflexible attitude. Other children and parents are likely to capitulate to avoid yet another confrontation. The child can become ‘intoxicated’ by such power and dominance, which may lead to conduct problems. ...Such children and some adults may ruminate for many years over past slights and injustices and seek resolution and revenge. The compensatory mechanism of arrogance can also affect other aspects of social interaction. The child may have difficulty admitting being wrong and be notorious for arguing...
     
    This seems like a rather poignant description of exactly how Hitler might have felt about Germany's loss in WWI. And though the "Hitler as Aspie" theory may seem preposterous at first glance, I do think it is worth exploring, as it might shine some light in some aspects of Hitler's personality and thus of his decision-making process that have remained enigmatic to most scholars, even after so many decades. It is a certain that our world and world view have been greatly influenced by exceptional individuals, many of whom do not fit into the "neurotypical" mold and were probably "neurodiverse" -- the nomenclature used these days of what was previously called "Asperger's Syndrome".

    I do not doubt that most of the commenters here are genuinely seeking the truth, and I include myself in that category. Sometimes the truth points us down rabbit holes that might even repel us at first, but this doesn't mean that we shouldn't at least consider the possibility. I'm more and more convinced that Hitler was indeed an Aspie, though I hadn't the faintest idea until recently (HT: Odd Rabbit) but if anybody has any counter-arguments (and not just lols and trolls) I would welcome them -- but beware of own goals....

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @eah

    “…children and adults with Asperger’s syndrome are sometimes more able to perceive and have compassion for the perspective of animals than humans.”

    Thanks again, …cobra
    and I bow low again ….this is wonderful information which I can confirm with first hand knowledge having watched a child with Aspi … he has a uniquely touching relationship with the animals he feeds and caresses … and the animals love him immensely and are very happy in her company.. you van see it
    It’s a wonderful thing to watch from the sidelines

    Everything you write about Aspi is, from my observations, true and a wealth of information that not everyone and especially those in chains, can understand.
    And this is good/true: “Sometimes the truth points us down rabbit holes that might even repel us at first, but this doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t at least consider the possibility”

    • Thanks: Fin of a cobra
  • @anarchyst
    The “American History Channel” in the USA should be renamed the “American Hitler Channel” for all the falsehoods and propaganda that it portrays and disseminates about WW2, Germany and Adolf Hitler.
    According to programs on the “American History Channel”, Hitler was a drug addict, impotent, riddled with syphilis and other STDs, yet possessed highly technical “superweapons”, possessed “alien technology”, advanced flight and anti-gravity technologies, and still could not “win” WW2.
    Anyone with an open mind who watches the Hitler lies and fabrications on that channel can easily see that it is all BS, especially when the so-called “holocaust™” propaganda is inserted into just about all of these programming “gems”. The same old photos of emaciated typhus victim bodies due to the result of the camps infrastructure collapses, NOT “gas chambers” are constantly being paraded around to remind “us” how evil Hitler truly was. (Yeah, right). In fact, Hollywood movie producers and directors were dispatched to Europe in order to assure that the jewish propaganda aspects of the so-called "holocaust grift" was maintained and preserved.
    Germany was much more advanced than even the USA of the time, hence “Operation Paperclip” commenced in which the USA snatched up Germany’s greatest scientific minds after the summation of WW2.
    Looking at the big picture (which is usually ignored), the “German state” was attacked by the rest of the world, and held on to its principles for over 6 years, far longer than expected.
    Hitler’s greatest “sin” was the monetization of labor (giving labor true “value”) and going against the Rothschild banks. Going against the jew-run banks made him “enemy #1”. In fact, Germany’s recovery from the Great Depression and the excesses of the Wiemar Republic was much quicker than that of the western countries and the USA. In fact, it took a World War for the USA to recover from the Great Depression.
    He also KNEW that there was a subset of Bolshevik jews who were fomenting communist revolution within Germany. Most people are unaware of the secret agreements that he had with the zionists to “encourage” jewish emigration to what was then known as Palestine. These agreements were celebrated by both the German government and the zionist leaders at the time. A commemorative coin was even issued to celebrate the agreement. THAT aspect of history is never mentioned on the “American Hitler Channel”.
    When it comes to WW2, Germany, and even the Allies, the “American History Channel” is 99% propaganda and 1% truth.
    If those of “the greatest generation” could see the jew-run world of today and what it has become, being jew-controlled, they would have thrown off their American uniforms and fought on the side of the Germans…
    Observe the present genocide in Gaza and the West Bank. That’s what (((they))) plan for all of us (gentiles).

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Thanks.
    It is very difficult to get a true and accurate picture of Hitler because of the huge propaganda done by the zionists about the whole ww2 and NSDAP. Everyone can see that the opinions here are verry different and are surely result of this massive propaganda from which everyone takes what he likes or prefer according to his own personal needs.

    Here is something different for someone who interested about Hitler … what Leon Degrelle writes in his article The Enigma of Hitler
    in The Journal of Historical Review, May-June 1994 (Vol. 14, No. 3), pages 22-26 about Hitler.
    https://ihr.org/journal/v14n3p22_Degrelle.html

    For me the article was a big suprise because it gave a very different picture compared to that in the MSM and official history. And I do not believe that Degrelle is making propaganda but seems to be sincere and honest.
    ——-
    Observe the present genocide in Gaza and the West Bank. That’s what (((they))) plan for all of us (gentiles).

    Anti-zionist Gilad Atzmon who left Israel has said: “We are all Palestinians”, and when you understand and see what the NWO-agenda/plan of the neocons really mean it is difficult to disagree that he is wright.

    • Thanks: annacat
  • @j2
    Four arguments pointing to the possibility that Hitler was not quite what it seems.

    1. Calculating the death toll of European Jews in the Second World War does not give 6 million. The figure is several millions smaller. Thus, Hitler did not intend to exterminate European Jews, but he did transport them to the East. What was he going to do with these Jews? The only logical answer is that they were to be settled somewhere. The only possible answer where they were to be settled is Palestine. This is supported by several arguments: 1) Hitler made the Ha'avara agreement promoting Jewish movement to Palestine, 2) in Hitler's home library there is a book with Hitler's underline on the sentence that Jews must be restored to Palestine, 3) Jews would not have stayed in Madagascar, pre-Zionists had already decided that they must be settled in Palestine. This must have been Hitler's goal: creating Israel.

    2. The Zionist plan of restoring Jews to Palestine did not start with the Zionist organization by Theodor Herzl. It started in 1840 in Jewish Freemason circles and it had a clear plan that Jews of Europe have 100 years time to move on their own to Palestine and if they do not move, they will be pushed to Palestine. It was because of this plan that pre-Zionists (not Herzl's Zionists) bought the USA to the First World War and got UK to give the Balfour declaration. As there was the Balfour declaration, pre-Zionists needed Jews to populate the new homeland. All this happened long before Hitler got interested in the Jewish question. Jews did not move to Palestine in any great numbers before 1939. Therefore they had to be pushed there. Somebody had to do it.

    3. The NSDAP party that pushed Jews out of Western and Central Europe has a history that directly connects to exactly the same group of pre-Zionists that wanted to restore Jews to Palestine in 1840. That is, Freemasons and some rich Jews. NSDAP was originally DAP, a German worker party created by the Thule Society. The Thule Society was created by Rudolf Sebottendorf, Mizraim rite Freemason (i.e., the one making all those revolutions and coups in the 19th and early 20th century) and a Theosophist. Sebottendorf joined the Germanic Order (nationalistic romantic secret society, not Freemason, not revolutionary, studying runes) and splitted out of this harmless secret society a secret society that had clear political goals. The new party NSDAP combined two of the popular movements: socialism and nationalism, and joined it with the essential element: antisemitism. Because at this time pre-Zionists saw antisemites as their greatest allies: both wanted Jews out of Europe. Pre-Zionists used antisemitism as a tool to force Jews to Palestine. Hitler's joining DAP is even more curious. Hitler was not antisemitic in Austria, nor during the First World War (he was an anticommunist and German nationalist). After the war, in 1919 he was trained as an intelligence agent by the German army. On the course Hitler gave many antisemitic speeches and he was sent to an openly antisemitic party, DAP, supposedly to spy it, but in fact to lead it. The leaders of DAP were looking for a strong leader to the party and Hitler was sent to them. That means, it was all arranged: Hitler was picked up and trained to do the job.

    4. There had to be a persecutor of Jews before they return to the home land, and this persecutor naturally must be destroyed. That is the prophecy and how could a new Israel be created by some esoteric pre-Zionist secret society except for according to the prophecy? Germany lost the Second World War. Hitler is largely to blame. Japan was to attack Soviets. Japan had been in their hands ever since the Russo-Japan war. Japan did not attack Soviets. It attacked USA. Hitler declared war on the USA. This was not what German army wanted: the USA joining the WW1 was the reason Germany lost last time. Hitler many many similar strange moves and concentrated on transporting Jews. Because the goal of this war was transporting Jews, not that Germany wins.

    So, whether Hitler thought he had a Jewish grandfather or not (which is not the same issue as if Hitler actually had a Jewish grandfather or not) is rather irrelevant. It is also quite irrelevant who supported NSDAP economically: the "free" media gave Hitler much publicity helping the party to grow. But these issues are not the main arguments. The main argument is that there was the Zionistic plan of the pre-Zionists. It was there long before Hitler. Jews had to go to Palestine. As they did not want to go, they were pushed. The persecutor of Jews had to be destroyed. This went just like that. And no other countries, like the USA, wanted to take the Jews, to save them. Because the goal was creation of Israel. Do you really think that Hitler, perfectly fitting to this plan, came outside this plan? He was a part of it. Who else was there to play the part that Hitler played? Yet, the plan there was and for sure the plan had all parts planned.

    Replies: @BertB, @Digital Samizdat, @Odd Rabbit, @Polymorph

    “The main argument is that there was the Zionistic plan of the pre-Zionists. It was there long before Hitler. Jews had to go to Palestine. As they did not want to go, they were pushed. The persecutor of Jews had to be destroyed. This went just like that.”

    Yes, I agree… and they had another plan too, not only Israel or Greater-Israel but the control of the whole world and Hitler was perfectly fitting to serve this plan too.
    Death in their orange groves: Palestine’s European Christians
    excerpt:
    Though the Templers just chugged along as they waited for the rapture and the Apocalypse to put an end to orange growing, events overtook them. The British interned them and shipped most of them off to far away Australia and the Zionists did what they do best. They shot the Templers in their beds or in their orange groves or wherever they came across them, so much so that the British had to warn the remaining Templers it was time to get out of Dodge, that the emerging Israeli state had no time for those who were not a part of der volk. As the Israelis later paid reparations to the survivors, that stands as evidence of their culpability in the ethnic cleansing of the Templers.

    https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/04/27/death-their-orange-groves-palestine-european-christians/

    • Replies: @j2
    @Odd Rabbit

    "and they had another plan too, not only Israel or Greater-Israel but the control of the whole world and Hitler was perfectly fitting to serve this plan too."

    You are correct: when Jews return to the homeland they get all non-Jewish gold and either enslave or destroy all nations. This is the essence of Jewish Messianism in prophecies.

  • j2 says:

    Four arguments pointing to the possibility that Hitler was not quite what it seems.

    1. Calculating the death toll of European Jews in the Second World War does not give 6 million. The figure is several millions smaller. Thus, Hitler did not intend to exterminate European Jews, but he did transport them to the East. What was he going to do with these Jews? The only logical answer is that they were to be settled somewhere. The only possible answer where they were to be settled is Palestine. This is supported by several arguments: 1) Hitler made the Ha’avara agreement promoting Jewish movement to Palestine, 2) in Hitler’s home library there is a book with Hitler’s underline on the sentence that Jews must be restored to Palestine, 3) Jews would not have stayed in Madagascar, pre-Zionists had already decided that they must be settled in Palestine. This must have been Hitler’s goal: creating Israel.

    2. The Zionist plan of restoring Jews to Palestine did not start with the Zionist organization by Theodor Herzl. It started in 1840 in Jewish Freemason circles and it had a clear plan that Jews of Europe have 100 years time to move on their own to Palestine and if they do not move, they will be pushed to Palestine. It was because of this plan that pre-Zionists (not Herzl’s Zionists) bought the USA to the First World War and got UK to give the Balfour declaration. As there was the Balfour declaration, pre-Zionists needed Jews to populate the new homeland. All this happened long before Hitler got interested in the Jewish question. Jews did not move to Palestine in any great numbers before 1939. Therefore they had to be pushed there. Somebody had to do it.

    3. The NSDAP party that pushed Jews out of Western and Central Europe has a history that directly connects to exactly the same group of pre-Zionists that wanted to restore Jews to Palestine in 1840. That is, Freemasons and some rich Jews. NSDAP was originally DAP, a German worker party created by the Thule Society. The Thule Society was created by Rudolf Sebottendorf, Mizraim rite Freemason (i.e., the one making all those revolutions and coups in the 19th and early 20th century) and a Theosophist. Sebottendorf joined the Germanic Order (nationalistic romantic secret society, not Freemason, not revolutionary, studying runes) and splitted out of this harmless secret society a secret society that had clear political goals. The new party NSDAP combined two of the popular movements: socialism and nationalism, and joined it with the essential element: antisemitism. Because at this time pre-Zionists saw antisemites as their greatest allies: both wanted Jews out of Europe. Pre-Zionists used antisemitism as a tool to force Jews to Palestine. Hitler’s joining DAP is even more curious. Hitler was not antisemitic in Austria, nor during the First World War (he was an anticommunist and German nationalist). After the war, in 1919 he was trained as an intelligence agent by the German army. On the course Hitler gave many antisemitic speeches and he was sent to an openly antisemitic party, DAP, supposedly to spy it, but in fact to lead it. The leaders of DAP were looking for a strong leader to the party and Hitler was sent to them. That means, it was all arranged: Hitler was picked up and trained to do the job.

    4. There had to be a persecutor of Jews before they return to the home land, and this persecutor naturally must be destroyed. That is the prophecy and how could a new Israel be created by some esoteric pre-Zionist secret society except for according to the prophecy? Germany lost the Second World War. Hitler is largely to blame. Japan was to attack Soviets. Japan had been in their hands ever since the Russo-Japan war. Japan did not attack Soviets. It attacked USA. Hitler declared war on the USA. This was not what German army wanted: the USA joining the WW1 was the reason Germany lost last time. Hitler many many similar strange moves and concentrated on transporting Jews. Because the goal of this war was transporting Jews, not that Germany wins.

    So, whether Hitler thought he had a Jewish grandfather or not (which is not the same issue as if Hitler actually had a Jewish grandfather or not) is rather irrelevant. It is also quite irrelevant who supported NSDAP economically: the “free” media gave Hitler much publicity helping the party to grow. But these issues are not the main arguments. The main argument is that there was the Zionistic plan of the pre-Zionists. It was there long before Hitler. Jews had to go to Palestine. As they did not want to go, they were pushed. The persecutor of Jews had to be destroyed. This went just like that. And no other countries, like the USA, wanted to take the Jews, to save them. Because the goal was creation of Israel. Do you really think that Hitler, perfectly fitting to this plan, came outside this plan? He was a part of it. Who else was there to play the part that Hitler played? Yet, the plan there was and for sure the plan had all parts planned.

    • Replies: @BertB
    @j2

    All valid arguments. I think the problem lies in the idea that 'controlled opposition' can only be people that are under direct command. I think that's not necessary at all. It's becoming clear that truly uncontrolled opposition is quickly removed from existence; only controllable opposition remains.

    Did Hitler take direct orders? Who knows, your arguments hint into that direction. In any case the result is the same, a massive win for the perpetrators.

    Replies: @j2

    , @Digital Samizdat
    @j2


    Hitler did not intend to exterminate European Jews, but he did transport them to the East. What was he going to do with these Jews? The only logical answer is that they were to be settled somewhere.
     
    Settling Jews in Palestine was not an option after war erupted between Germany and the British Empire, as the latter had a League of Nations mandate giving it exclusive control over Palestine. Personally, I think the likeliest answer to your question as to why Hitler was shipping all those Jews eastward from 1942 on was that he hoped to reopen the old Pale of Settlement.

    Replies: @j2

    , @Odd Rabbit
    @j2

    "The main argument is that there was the Zionistic plan of the pre-Zionists. It was there long before Hitler. Jews had to go to Palestine. As they did not want to go, they were pushed. The persecutor of Jews had to be destroyed. This went just like that."

    Yes, I agree... and they had another plan too, not only Israel or Greater-Israel but the control of the whole world and Hitler was perfectly fitting to serve this plan too.
    Death in their orange groves: Palestine’s European Christians
    excerpt:
    Though the Templers just chugged along as they waited for the rapture and the Apocalypse to put an end to orange growing, events overtook them. The British interned them and shipped most of them off to far away Australia and the Zionists did what they do best. They shot the Templers in their beds or in their orange groves or wherever they came across them, so much so that the British had to warn the remaining Templers it was time to get out of Dodge, that the emerging Israeli state had no time for those who were not a part of der volk. As the Israelis later paid reparations to the survivors, that stands as evidence of their culpability in the ethnic cleansing of the Templers.

    https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/04/27/death-their-orange-groves-palestine-european-christians/

    Replies: @j2

    , @Polymorph
    @j2

    Thank you for offering the first sensible grown-up comment so far in this thread. It blows away Pierre Simon and Ron Unz's above smokescreen. It is otherwise disheartening to read so many comments pointing to, and breathlessly explaining, shadows on so many Platonic cave walls.

    The only thing I would add is that the Zionist Project, even in its modern form, can be traced back earlier than 1840. Jewish scholars in the 18th century, already at the heart of European institutions, were explicitly speculating on the form the Zionist endgame would take, and its timetable. More than that, it is not, nor has it ever been really possible to distinguish between Judaism as-such and its Zionism as-such.

    Yet it is difficult to discern precisely when it was decided that German Romantic efflorescence would be the tool to use as deceptive bait. I suspect for this we would need to consult the Rabbis.

    Only once all this is digested can we reflect on what this means for the human soul and spirit.

  • @Hulkamania
    Hitler was not controlled, but he did play into the hands of the Jews/Anglos and Germany paid the price for it.

    Overall, Hitler was too pro-British (viewing them as fellow "Germanic" people), too anti-Russian, and not anti-Jew enough. If Hitler had renamed his party "the socialism in one country with German characteristics party" and allied with Stalin to wage a war of annihilation against the British using sarin on all of their population centers, then he could have won. Then American influence could have been removed from the continent and it could have been united under a system of socialism in one country with European characteristics.

    Replies: @Anonymous534, @Aleatorius, @Jacob Rothschild, @R_Hak

    He had a weird schizo love for the British Empire combined with hatred of Jews, even though the British Empire was run by the Jews.
    That’s like being anti-Jew but pro-American Empire today. It is just not a coherent position. Try being an anti-Jew ruler of a major country today, the US will do all it can to get rid of you. But Hitler though he would be allies with the British. That’s what vegetarianism does to the brain.
    Sad!

    • Agree: Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
    @Anonymous534

    Very true. Hitler was oversolicitous of London, even though he should have known better.

    , @Godfree Roberts
    @Anonymous534

    Though Britain was 97% Anglo, the Royal Family was 50% German in 1914. So they changed their surnames names from Battenburg to 'Windsor,' an inspired choice, in my opinion.
    Princely states like Saxe-Coburg-Gotha provided consorts for British Queens (Prince Albert), and Queens for its Kings (Duchess Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz for George III).
    Kaiser Wilhelm was the grandson of Queen Victoria, whom he adored, and such a fan of the British Navy that his cousin, the King of England, bestowed on him the rank of Admiral of the Royal Navy.
    But all he wanted were the Admirals' dress uniforms, which he donned whenever British guests showed up, much to their confusion.
    He joked that Shakespeare's The Merry Wives of Windsor should be re-titled The Merry Wives of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. He was constantly making jokes, but that is the only one that anyone considered funny or clever.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    , @Malla
    @Anonymous534


    He had a weird schizo love for the British Empire combined with hatred of Jews, even though the British Empire was run by the Jews.
     
    There is nothing wrong in admiring the British Empire, after all it was a remarkable entity in history. Hitler thought that Germany and Britain should be brothers and help each other out. He also foolishly thought that the British Empire will be bulwark against Marxist Socialism but he did not realize that the British deep state had many pro-Marxists. He underestimated the Jewish influence in Britain. It was only later that Hitler and the National Socialists realized that the British elite were Jewish/extremely pro-Jewish and up to a lessor extent pro-Marxist.

    Replies: @Anonymous534

    , @Wildsilver
    @Anonymous534

    Jewish people in Germany were widely different but the same race.
    The majority were Communists which made an easy double target & loaded statistics heavily to race
    Then there were Jews whose families had been Germans for generations.
    Many of these held high military rank, had their own Brigades etc & fought against Communism & USSR.
    There were also Zionists who had their own special relationship with Nazi Germany in getting their 'people' moved out to Palestine and removing their competition
    Interestingly, of the four main Jewish denominations, the Zionists survived the carnage with the least loss of their 'tribe'.

    https://twitter.com/bHarshy12/status/1786737537651810311/photo/1

    That the origin of Communism, Zionism & Fascism occurred in mid 19th century Imperial Britain is surely a coincidence, no?

    Replies: @Patrick McNally

  • anonymous[388] • Disclaimer says:

    definitely more complicated.
    firstly hitler was forced into war he didn’ t want by western pressure and the threat of russian invasion.(The forced war- Hogan. Icebreaker -Suvorov)
    and pre the war he dramatically improved the lot of Germans.

    However there are lots of shadows hanging over Hitler.

    Firstly he had Jewish ancestry which he knew and hid. For instance his family blackmailed him about his ancestry and he paid them to keep quiet. he had on the male side the same genes as common among Jews and lastly there was a secret SS report confirming his Jewish ancestry.
    Also he did receive funding from Jewish sources. The book “Who financed Hitler” by Mr Poole records one major Jewish finansier
    Here is a press article on Jewish financing of Hitler
    The Pittsburgh Press – Nov 20, 1938
    http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=K20jAAAAIBAJ&sjid=JkwEAAAAIBAJ&dq=jews%20financed%20hitler&pg=3354%2C4420870

    What does this mean?

    Considering both facts that Hitler didnt want a war, was forced into it. But he had strange connections with the Jewish world, it leaves with a lot of un-answered questions

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @Pierre Simon
    @anonymous

    Not true, this common myth is thoroughly debunked here: Was Adolf Hitler of Jewish or Rothschild Origin? Karl’s Substack. Everything about Jews and Judaism, Feb. 26, 2024.

    Replies: @Liosnagcat

  • The academic world has been buzzing with arguments seeking to explain the origins and mechanism of Jewish power in the modern West. The question is rife with landmines and one side of the debate is heavily stifled. One theory gaining traction, promoted by figures such as Richard Hanania and Cambridge lecturer Nathan Cofnas, is that...
  • @Fin of a cobra
    @Odd Rabbit


    After reading the article The Enigma of Hitler by Leon Degrelle on IHR-web site I started to suspect that he could have been an ‘Aspi’ too. ... What is your opinion
     
    Hello Rabbit! Thanks for the replies and sorry for the delay. Damn interesting what you found there -- I hadn't looked into Hitler as being autistic, to tell you the truth. What an oversight! And now you sent me down another bottomless rabbit hole, you, you... Odd Rabbit! That's great -- thanks! And you were completely right in your intuitions -- Hitler was "very" autistic -- and that's not my opinion, but Michael Fitzgerald's (see below).

    Go with your intuitions, Rabbit, and pretty soon you'll be able to make a bunch of "diagnoses" of famous deceased autistic people that Fitzgerald himself overlooked! Anyway, I just found a few quotes in which Fitzgerald makes a "diagnosis" of Hitler as being, unequivocally, autistic -- he really doesn't mince words. These direct quotes below are from his book and from an article on Researchgate (but there really isn't much at all in the article -- just the paragraph below). If I find anything else I'll post it here. Thanks again, Rabbit!

    From Autism and Creativity, by Michael Fitzgerald

    - "Many of Hitler’s traits seem very autistic."

    - "Adolf Hitler meets the criteria for autistic psychopathy described by Hans Asperger."

    - "He was a poor sleeper and had food fads. He recoiled from physical contact, was unable to forge genuine friendships, and showed an emptiness in his human relations. His conversations in the Men’s Home in Vienna were really harangues and invited no reciprocity, for which he lacked the capacity."

    - "In Munich he was distant, self-contained, withdrawn and without friends. His comrades noted that he had no humanitarian feelings."

    - "He was extremely socially awkward and uncertain in small groups. He showed little human interest in his followers, and even one of his leading supporters accused him of ‘contempt for mankind’."

    - "A colleague, Gregor Strasser, thought that there was ‘something other-worldly about Hitler…a lack of knowledge of human beings and with it a lack of sound judgement of them…he lived without any bonds to another human being’."

    - "His poor adaptation to people was perhaps most obvious in his relations with women. During his life he took only a slight interest in a couple of women. One was his niece, Geli Raubal, who effectively became his prisoner and said ‘my uncle is a monster’; she apparently committed suicide in his apartment. His second relationship was with Eva Braun, who apparently attempted suicide by shooting in 1932 and died with him in the bunker in 1945."

    - "His colleagues regarded him as a remote figure: he was an obsessive, and obsessives rarely make good or interesting company, except in the eyes of those who share the obsession or those in awe of, or dependent on, such an unbalanced personality. He was single-minded and inflexible."

    - "He spent a great deal of time with Albert Speer, examining architectural plans, and this remained a major focus throughout his life. His other major interest was in the music of Wagner."

    - "His greatest interest, clearly, was in control over people and power over people. His ability to achieve this control and power was extraordinary."

    - "Hitler had ‘a bed compulsion, which demands that the bed be made in a particular way with the quilt folded according to a prescribed pattern and that a man must make the bed before he could go to sleep’."

    - "Hitler did not use language for the purpose of interaction with others, but only for the purpose of dominating others. He endlessly engaged in long-winded, pedantic speeches, with ‘illogical arguments full of crude comparisons and cheap allusions’."

    - "After the First World War ‘his awkward mannerisms’ were noted."

    - From Fitzgerald's paper: "Hitler was a typical person with high functioning autism, (Fitzgerald, 2004). He was a typical criminal autistic psychopath, (Fitzgerald, 2010, 2015). Hitler was enigmatic and contradictory. He had poor social reciprocal relationships, was remote, obsessive – compulsive, had narrow interests, autistic charisma, pragmatic language issues, unusual tone of voice, awkward mannerisms, unusual gait and a peculiar diet, (Fitzgerald, 2016).

    https://www.amazon.com/Autism-Creativity-between-Exceptional-Ability/dp/1583912134?asin=1583912134&revisionId=&format=4&depth=1

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353325370_Napoleon_Hitler_Dictators_Psychopathy_and_autistic_psychopathy
     

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Odd Rabbit

    Hello …cobra!
    You wrote:
    I just found a few quotes in which Fitzgerald makes a “diagnosis” of Hitler as being, unequivocally, autistic — he really doesn’t mince words. These direct quotes below are from his book and from an article on Researchgate (but there really isn’t much at all in the article — just the paragraph below). If I find anything else I’ll post it here. Thanks again, Rabbit!

    Have you found anything else?.. you promised post to me. I’m still waiting if you have something new for me. The enigma of Hitler intrigues me so much after reading the article of Leon Degrelle …I would like to get nearer the truth…

  • Here's what everyone needs to understand about Ukraine: The United States has already moved on to Plan B. No, the Biden administration has not issued an official statement on the matter, but the shift has already begun. The Washington Brain-trust has abandoned any hope of winning the war outright (Plan A) and has, thus, adopted...
  • @anonymous
    @Mike Jones' other brother Darryl

    Jews make up most of the billionaires in America and control the financial institutions of the United States. 27 Jews are in Biden's administration at the top rungs. It might be more accurate to say that Jews rule with the support of servile WASPs, but WASPs have not exercised comprehensive institutional control in the United States since long before the Second World War - and none after.

    Replies: @werpor, @Mike Jones' other brother Darryl, @mike smith

    Jews control over what is known today as the United States, began in 1492. But Jews control over money began thousands of years ago. History is bunk without one understands that Jews control the money you have in your pocket, your access to credit, the price you pay i.e., the interest when you borrow money, the rate and amount of inflation or deflation, the amount of credit available, and the many means and ways Jews continually steal money from the public purse.

    Jews control the public purses because they control Congress and the enabling legislation which preferences them. Jews control the major corporations. Jews control Wall Street. Jews control the Treasury. Jews control the U.S. economy. Jews foment war and the threat of war.

    Every man, woman and child is a measurable commodity. Few of us see ourselves in that way. But everyone is indebted from birth to death. A very small number of people are free from the debt slavery system. It is they who run the system. The two main instruments of control are debt and taxes.

    There are no free men. Almost every last person is a commodity. Even the quantity of those whom are serving time in jail are pre-determined. The police are responsible for providing product for the jails. The rules promulgated by Congress ensure a steady stream of rule breakers. The United States is nothing like its myths portray it!

    [MORE]

    Most certainly the American Revolution was promulgated by a desire among the elites in the 13 Colonies to disassociate those Colonies from the controls promulgated by the English Crown. But this at the time meant principally the Jews control of the money supply in England. By 1775 the English predominated in extending their Empire of control throughout the World. This was enabled by Jews controlling the purse. The purse was directed to build the means of extending and controlling the Empire — the Royal Navy. Most likely there would today be no United States if the English were not warring on two fronts. The Revolution was successful (in fact a close thing) because England was at war with the French.

    The Jews undertook the means of realizing their aim of world conquest by making use of England as a platform safe from the endless wars consuming the resources on the European mainland. From England Jews could encourage war and profit from the endless loans necessitated by it.

    In fact England maintained a policy of destabilization in Europe. Discouraging alliances among the European countries was a recipe for constant war there — this of course included Russia. But Russia is a different animal. Known popularly as the Great Game, England constantly prodded Russia, but Russias enormous land mass was safe from the predations wrought by the Royal Navy.

    Until the Jews calculation that there was more than one way to skin a cat. Jewish bankers had made great strides in defenestrating monarchies throughout Europe fomenting Revolution or doing their best to prevent consolidation of disparate principalities in Germany.

    The English Revolution was the beginning. The French Revolution followed at pretty much the same time as the American Revolution. The French Revolution resulted in Napoleon assaulting Russia. Eventually the Russian Revolution brought down the Czar’s (the monarchy) in Russia.

    Obviously the American Revolution was a revolt against the Jewish instruments of power and control.

    But as history records the Jew finally defeated the revolutionaries in 1913. The Jews never stopped trying to regain control of the United States since its inception. The Jews prevented the ideals elucidated in the American Constitution from being realized!

    The Jews are a subversive element within the United States abetted by Jewish money hegemony they have managed to obtain throughout the West. This should alert the readers’ here on Unz to understand the Great Game is no game. The Jews never cease trying to foment wars in countries all around the world.

    The United States is the principal means of projecting Jewish intentions. They are not a special people. No doubt it has been long understood that their intentions to realize their inhuman dialectic as expressed in their Talmud, Torah, and Kabbalah could be realized only if they obsessed over their means and methods. Obviously money is their prime obsession.

    The Jews use money as a means of corrupting anyone disposed to its lure! And no doubt this excludes few men or women. Corrupting influences are a Jewish specialty. No doubt many Jews are naïve and relatively ignorant of the prime directive elucidated in their foundational literature — mumbling the words they memorize without giving much thought to their meaning or the contextual sources.

    Still the Jews appear to operate everywhere with something like a hive mind. They undermine everything decent. Jews are the first cause of our discontent. Among those of us whom are uncertain of the causes of today’s discontent one only has to consider the consequences of the things and ideas they promulgate. Everything once considered decent the Jew has corrupted.

    They continually foment war — while at the same time erecting institutions which are made to appear benign which they then control but are in fact institutions which promulgate their control over mens minds, feelings and actions. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank and the United Nations and NATO are deployed in ways completely opposite to their apparent mandates.

    In the recent instance where South Africa sought institutional constraint over the Jewish insanity being promulgated in Palestine against the inhabitants in Gaza the Jews repudiated the constraints they were instrumental in creating. The court of public opinion repudiates the Jew. When ‘ordinary’ men and women witness the destruction wrought by the Jews’ in Palestine they are repelled. Clearly they are Jews killing their hostages in Gaza.

    The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank and the United Nations and NATO are tools uses by the powerful to bring distant countries and their peoples into the orbit of international control over their economies.

    The upper echelons of these institutions includes a disproportionate representation of Jews.

    Institutional control enables Jews to bend these institutions to their will and their objectives. Consider the Bank for International Settlements in the same light. This Bank is the Central Bank of Central Banks. Jews control the Bank for International Settlements.

    In other words Jews control the United States of America — they have only one loyalty. That loyalty is exclusively loyalty to Jews.

    • Agree: Pfhil
    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
  • @Yukon Jack

    The United States has already moved on to Plan B.
     
    I agree, when Nuland resigned was the moment in time of the shift. Nuland failed. Told to resign. The Jew Plan failed. Biden's presidential glory of toppling Russia taken away. Now it's a new Jew plan, which will also fail. Jews are warmongering idiots, they love to start wars not thinking them through. A wise nation would never start a war (with Russia), but the USA is not run by wise people, it is run by war mongering lunatics.

    Since Plan A did not work, I have little to no confidence Plan B would work either. For D.C. lunatics, these wars are a theoretical exercise, for Russia it is an existential life or death exercise, and they do not want to be forced into using nukes. So my guess is Russia will outgame the morons in the Biden administration. Russia stopped Napoleon and Hitler, stopping Biden will be a piece of cake.

    Now that Biden has lost the war, and is only interested in damaging Russia, Russia needs to conclude the war and stop hostilities, end the special operation, up his game, and end the Zelensky regime. Why they have not droned him remains a mystery leading to speculation that Russia is in on the Ukraine genocide, now estimated 500,000 to 1 million dead Ukes - dead white Christian boys for the Khazar Jewish mobster state. Half of the Ukrainians fled the failed nation, 2.3 million wounded. Ukrainian is now a basket case. The US Gov currently pays all the wages and retirements.

    To add salt to Russia's wounds, Biden and the EU Ursula von der Lying want to confiscate the $300 billion in the Russian oil trading accounts and give to Ukraine to fight Russia. Russia should use that as a payment for the rest of Ukraine, and just take Ukraine back from the Jew run west. Why would Russia want a meddling Globo Homo state on their border? That would be like having a Bigger Israel as your neighbor.


    WASHINGTON (AP) — The big U.S. aid package for Ukraine and other allies that President Joe Biden signed Wednesday also allows the administration to seize Russian state assets located in the U.S. and use them for the benefit of Kyiv.

    That could mean another $5 billion in assistance for Ukraine, coming from Russian Central Bank holdings that have already been frozen in the United States. The seizures would be carried out under provisions of the REPO Act, short for the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity for Ukrainians Act, that were incorporated into the aid bill.
     

    It all seems like theater to me. Why were Kiev's lights on for the last 2 years? Why is Zelensky and his government allowed to exist? Why does Russia play tiddlywinks when Moscow is being droned? Now the Russian oil refineries are on fire. Seems very strange indeed, allowing pipsqueak Zelensky to damage the Motherland while the west suffers no damage at all.

    Then we have the Ukraine-Israel connection. Israel lost against Hamas, and Iran put Israel into it's place. So how much longer does Israel have? Israel credit rating downgraded twice even with massive US financial aid. Will the Zionists flee Israel for Ukraine, is that the real plan, which is why Ukraine is being depopulate of any whites. Why did the last Ukraine package have $300 for Ukraine border security - to keep the draft recruits in, so they can not escape to Poland?


    Why doesn’t Russia tell us what really happened on 9-11? Who murdered JFK and RFK? Who shot down MH 17 over Ukraine? What happened to MH 376 which disappeared in 2014? It’s obvious that Russia is in collusion with the NeoCons attempting to start WW3. This is why Levrov et co. refer to the West as “Anglo Saxons” when everyone knows the West is run by satanist Jews just like Russia.

    Wars are all orchestrated to kill patriot dupes on both sides. This is why Russia didn’t just remove Zelensky. They needed to kill 500,000 Ukrainian goyim and 100,000 Russians.
     

    WW3 so far seems very contrived. But maybe not, perhaps the Jews running the Biden Administration are stupid, real stupid, desperate times for hegemon losing it's grip on the world. A wise nation would never start a war against Russia, but the USA is not run by wise people, it is run by war mongering lunatics. Ukraine will fail, then Israel will fail, then the United States hegemon will fail. The plan to topple Russia via Ukraine proxy will spectacularly backfire - Russia will end up with most if not all of Ukraine, stronger, will full wartime production. The plan to wipe out Gaza and the remaining Palestinians will also fail, Israel could collapse, Jews flee, and the Gazans will get the Jew homes. Everything will go against the Jews because they are immoral bastards, they could not live with a two state solution, so it will end up being one state, a Palestinians state, you watch and see.

    Replies: @Anonymous534, @Common Time, @GMC, @Odd Rabbit, @Joe Levantine, @anonymous, @Emil Nikola Richard, @H. L. M, @Unbornawakened, @cousin lucky, @Oikeamielinen, @James Charles

    ” This is why Russia didn’t just remove Zelensky.”

    I do not agree. Maybe I’m too gullible but I trust Putin.
    And removing Zelensky could only exacerbate and prolong the conflict.

    “Why they have not droned him remains a mystery leading to speculation that Russia is in on the Ukraine genocide, now estimated 500,000 to 1 million dead Ukes – dead white Christian boys for the Khazar Jewish mobster state. Half of the Ukrainians fled the failed nation, 2.3 million wounded. Ukrainian is now a basket case. The US Gov currently pays all the wages and retirements.”

    The genocide is not Russia’s fault. Putin must think the survival of his own country. He cannot take the responsibility of the life of Ukrainians, the zionist west must bear it.

    • Agree: Newcomer
  • Antisemitism used to mean “someone who doesn’t like Jews,” but nowadays it means “someone that Jews don’t like for some reason or another.” The deliberate trick here is to make you think there is something wrong not with the Jewish baby killers, liars, or scum who are doing bad things but with the person noticing...
  • @Fin of a cobra

    let’s first find out what Jews themselves say about antisemitism. Is it a rational and logical reaction to Jewish behaviour?
     
    Antisemitism is neither logical nor rational, not if you value your livelyhood and life. If you commit the ultimate crime of antisemitism, you will be deplatformed, cancelled, ostracized, bankrupted, imprisoned or killed. Even if you are the richest man in the world, if there is even a whif of antisemitism circling about you like a bad odor, you will at least be Canossaed -- as Elon Musk found out much to his chagrin. So Musk had to prostrate himself before the Auschwitzian Altar, where the sacrificial fumes rising from his sacrifice were oh so pleasing to Yahweh. Oh, and ask Ye if antisemitism is in any way logical or rational -- I bet he'll give you some insight on the supposed "rationality of antisemitism". Oy, vey. The Jews are getting tired of still having to explain the irrationality of antisemitism to some of you goys. But that is not even the ultimate lesson.

    This is the way it works, goys: the Jews are not "God's chosen people", not really. The Jews just pretend that this is the case because the truth -- The Real Truth -- would be too hard for the goys to swallow, at least at this junction of our pitiful intellectual development. The "Chosen People" and similar concepts are just intellectual training wheels to get the goys used to thinking in the righteous manner, that is, constantly linking "Jews" and "God". When that essential link -- God to Jews; Jews to God -- has finally been rammed up the collective goy consciousness, so good and so deep and so hard that it's become like the very air the goy breaths -- well, then the Jews can finally reveal themselves and spread the Real Revelation, the Real Gospel, the Real Good News, that is:

    The Jews are God.

    Ok, I know some of you will think this rather shocking and absurd. Admittedly, not all goys are ready to take this next logical and rational leap of faith into the Arms of The Jews. Fine. The Jews can wait. The Jews can be even more didactic and patient than they have been already, until all accept this ultimate truth. But they have been giving hints all along, such as when Jabotinsky said, "My God -- whose name is the Jewish People". There are many examples of this fact -- that the Jews are God -- coming from the mouth of Jews themselves. Look them up, goy. But these examples were already there from the beginning, except that it was all written in code: it's right there in the Bible that the Jews so kindly wrote for the goys. The stupid goys just didn't have the intellectual capacity to interpret the Bible correctly. So let's give the Bible a good reading, shall we, with the correct interpretation:

    Job 1:21: "the Jew giveth, and the Jew taketh away; blessed be the name of the Jew."

    John 14:6: "The Jews are the way, and the truth, and the life."

    John 6:35: "The Jews are the bread of life; whoever comes to the Jews shall not hunger, and whoever believes in the Jews shall never thirst."

    John 8:12: "The Jews are the light of the world. Whoever follows the Jews will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."

    In other words, goy, the Jews are Logos. The Jews are logic and rationality itself. So now do you see, goy, how irrational and ilogical antisemitism is? Antisemitism is an attack on God Himself. It's heresy, goy. Pure sacrilege. Do you understand now, goy, why a Jewish fingernail is worth more than a million goy lives? Because it's the most holy Fingernail of God, goy! Are you starting to get the picture? How many hints do you need? Come to Papa, little goy: Jews are God -- your God. What you still don't understand, little goy, is that you are an Anus in a party of Jew Cocks: if you don't want to get butthurt, better keep your ass up against the wall -- the Wailing Wall! That means no antisemitism for you, goy. Avoiding antisemitism -- a sacrilege towards your God, the Jews -- is thus both rational and logical.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Publius 2

    The Jews are God.

    So some of them really seem to believe. Excerpt from Henry Makow:
    George Soros “I see myself as a God.”
    https://youtube.com/shorts/hmE5XtI71-s?si=ayRGljPMufteoPHI

    https://henrymakow.com/2024/04/april-25---why-does-russia-kee.html

    John 14:6: “The Jews are the way, and the truth, and the life.”

    I believed it was Jesus who said that. It is better suited to describe him as the talmudists.

  • EXCERPT FROM AN EMAIL WRITTEN IN RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FROM A FRIEND ASKING FOR HIS ASTUTE ANALYSIS OF IRAN’S DRONE AND MISSILE ATTACK ON ISRAEL. Theodore Postol is Professor of Science, Technology and National Security Policy in the Program in Science, Technology, and Society at MIT. I apologize for not getting back to you...
  • Atlanatacism is done, it is cooked. Put a fork in it.

    https://www.unz.com/pescobar/cutting-through-the-fog-masking-a-new-page-in-the-art-of-war/#comment-5231314

    Finance Capitalism/Atlanatacism is predicted on international private (stock owned) banks. The debt instruments and other finance paper are hypothecated, and then spread internationally via the international finance centers, such as London and Wall Street.

    The new world war is on multiple dimension, and the order of importance is first economy then enforcement. The new “belt and road” countries are “production” based industrial capitalism with sovereign money. Industrial capitalism and finance capitalism are rank enemies. The old canard about socialism/communism vs democracy was a duping operation to capture normies. It has always been about finance capital wanting to take sordid gain, to rent seek.

    The most important thing is how a country deals with its money, taxes, and debts. Finance Capitalism wants to spread its debts internationally, and then enforce debt contracts with a blue water navy. Rim theory and other military doctrines grew up around the logic of finance.

    Corporatocracy, or rule by corporations, was invented simultaneously with finance capitalism, while our Jewish friends were on sojourn in Amsterdam. They needed a new usury system. The Atlantacist system consists of power projection with deep water navies (initially) and now air power. A merchants ships bill of lading can be hypothecated by a private bank, while said ship is still in transit. Navies are also to insure “safe passage” of merchant vessels. Atlanatacism is also predicated on long supply lines, where heavy military goods transit across deep water oceans.

    The second order of importance in the new multi dimensional war, is the advent of A2AD and ISR. This doctrine then thwarts Atlantacist offensive aggression. A2AD is close in, to maintain the land rims. Supply lines are short, across land, and cannot be easily interdicted. ISR, Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance have gotten a big boost with drones. Decision making within ISR domain is now sped up (drones can do both recon and attack, and soon supply), as the Russians have demonstrated. Sped up ISR has NATO (Atlantacist) completely flummoxed.

    There is a reason the Russian navy is bottled up in harbor; the same would apply to NATO. The rules of the game have changed. Surface ships are vulnerable, as even the Houthis are demonstrating.

    Atlanticist sea powers (countries parasitized by Jews and Finance Capitalism) can still rain down ballistic missiles on the land powers (the new emerging multi polar world) and get through their defenses. But, so too can the land powers rain down missiles, especially onto Atlantacist America, which can no longer hide behind the ocean (I’m American).

    The multidimensional world war currently unfolding is being won by the superior industrial capitalism and sovereign money of the emerging multi polar world. Civilizations not organized on industrial capitalism/sovereign money principle are destined for the Ash Heap, because they fundamentally are anti-life, and are predicated on stealing wealth rather than creating it.

    It is the supreme irony that industrial capitalism and sovereign money was invented by the Colonials. This is why I am both a Nazi and an American, and why there is no contradiction. America was parasitized and has veered off-course from its founding. The colonials found themselves as a land-power, and they had sovereign money. Their Colonial Script was issued by Treasury along with Bills of Credit. The revolutionary war was to protect their new American System of Economy, invented mostly by Robert Morris in Massachusets Bay. The Jewish cousin-hood in London attacked with their “sea power” and finance capital, but only after causing an 8 year depression by demonetizing script.

    U.S. Congress even has fascist symbols. Basically, if you are an American and go along with the “democracy” and finance capitalism is good propaganda, you are a dupe who has been brainwashed. We Americans are due a spanking because the founders allowed the Jew and other agents of mammon to insert themselves as parasites into our body politic. The founders did not put strong enough protections in place.

    The spanking is coming, its a foregone conclusion; because all of the old jew methods that won wars, debt spread and turned the vanquished into debt slaves, no longer work.

    Industrial Capitalism and National Socialism go together hand and glove. China is effectively national socialist. The Socialism is to lower production costs. Natural monopolies which are prone to privatization and rent seeking, are put in the public sector to lower costs.

    The finance capitalists in their cat-bird seats of London/Paris/Wall Street, desperately want to cling to their past sordid gains. They like having Maria give them B.J.s and having Manuel mow the lawn.

    The impotence of the Jews to defend their special “land,” of Zion/Israel, which is an offshoot of finance capital, is making the agents of Mammon go insane. Remember, Zionism was funded into existence by finance capital in the same way as was Bolshevism. It was not a god thing, it was the worst kind of people, like Rothschild, funding the operations and doing a death harvest.

    Ultimately, the Jew is getting his comeuppance. You cannot hoax reality and take usury and rents forever. America is also getting its comeuppance, and of course, I am not happy about things as I will be tarred also.

    The only card left to play by the Jew and FC types, is terror and color revolution. They can recycle more petrodollars (through their owned private banks) and channel it toward Takfiri warriors, or Kosher Nazis (in Ukraine).

    If America joins WW3 as a direct combatant, all of her ships will be sunk while in transit across the Atlantic. If she goes nuclear, the oceans are not a barrier, and missile defense is easily penetrated.

    • Thanks: HdC, Odd Rabbit
  • The following is an edited, amended, and condensed version of a speech I delivered in Zurich’s environs earlier this month. The occasion was sponsored by Zeit–Fragen, a twice-monthly journal that also comes out in French and English as Horizons et débats and Current Concerns. — P.L. What does it mean now, in the spring of...
  • @Fin of a cobra
    This article is pointless for the readership here at Unz. The readers here are Jew Aware -- that's what makes this article meaningless drivel for us. So dear old Patrick doesn't know what it's like to be an American in 2024. Want me to tell you? It's rather obvious: Americans are the slaves of the Jews. And maybe it's even worse than that: Americans are the willing slaves of the Jews. There. I just gave you your godforsaken identity. Happy now?

    Why won't you admit it? Isn't the objective to "restore ourselves to sanity"? Didn't you say "the endeavor must begin with each of us"? Why don't we begin with you, Patrick? Why don't you try this: admit that you, the individual called Patrick, are The Willing Slave of the Jew. That is your identity, Patrick. The bondage to the Jew defines you.

    This admission, Patrick, will be the first step to restore your sanity -- we can see that you are troubled. What you can do is start with baby steps: you may, at first, merely "identify" as The Willing Slave of the Jew. Afterwards, you can slowly start conjugating the verb "to be" -- remember that one, before "they" stole your language? Try it: "I AM the Willing Slave of the Jew". You don't understand what a relief it'll be for you to assume your real identity, Patrick. It'll be sanity-restoring.

    Even though it's so obvious who you really are, Patrick, you won't ever admit it, will you? Why not? Because The Jews won't allow it! How ironic! Your masters won't even allow you to acknowledge that they are your masters! Isn't that the epitome of cruelty? They rule over you but won't even allow you to admit it openly? Does any American doubt this? Try it. Try saying it in public. Even those last two words together -- "The Jews"-- are verboten. You might even get away with saying "Jews", tout court, but put the "The" in front and you're already an unrepentant antisemite -- and will be summarily destroyed.

    Why won't The Jews allow Americans to humbly admit that The Jews rule over them? It's not just because it's "antisemitic". No. It's more than that. The Jews are always even more perfidious than you can imagine, at first. What The Jews intend by prohibitting you, Patrick, as an American, to have a past, to have a language, and to willingly admit that you are a Willing Slave of the Jew -- what they are doing is prohibitting you from having an identity, any identity, even that of a slave. That was their devilish goal from the beginning. So you're out of luck. No identity. And thus, unfortunately, no sanity either....

    Sorry, Patrick, you're forever doomed to the life of an identity-less unhinged American Blob.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    “— what they are doing is prohibitting you from having an identity, any identity, even that of a slave.”

    In other words you are nothing. Only atoms and molecules. Only evolutionary dirt.
    I try to explain my view:
    Real change starts with being aware of who you are
    If I don’t understand //will not understand / or it is not aloud, or it’s forbidden to understand/ that I am already on unconscious level a prisoner/slave then I cannot build anything but a new prisoner/slave identity that I can’t even be aware of, …which means that I become just a better prisoner/slave…
    It’s only by being aware that you’re a prisoner/slave that you can grow free/became sane.
    Of course it ‘s possible that when one’s consciousness grows, only then does one realize that one is a prisoner and wake up. But it’s a slower way and doesn’t always work at all.

  • THE GODFATHER and THE GODFATHER PART II have been among the most resonant in cinematic history. Their stature as Great Movies owes not only to artistry but social, cultural, and political significance. Like Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY in relation to science-fiction movies, they were unlike all previous movies in the gangster genre in...
  • whites succumbed to the foolhardy notion that ‘racism’ and ‘antisemitism’ are the two greatest evils of all time

    “Foolhardy”, you say? I would say not! And I’ll try to prove it to you by the end of this comment.

    First, what is “evil”? Answer: it is whatever the Jew wants you to believe it is. The Jews decided that the definition of absolute evil is “antisemitism”, and they implanted that idea into the normies’ hivemind through the media. The whole white population grew up watching countless Nazis-are-evil movies, Hogan’s Heroes, and, more subtly, “The Six Million Dollar Man” — the Jews will make that number seep into your subconscious one way or another. Hollywood and the media in general are the most effective mind control weapon the Jews ever invented: as Unz repeats in almost every article, “the media creates our reality”, by which he means “the Jews create our reality”.

    But why did they choose antisemitism as the greatest evil to implant in the normie head? The most obvious answer is because “it’s good for the Jews”. Supposedly, the Jews want to prevent another “Holocaust” — which is nothing but another media creation which wraps itself like an Alien facehugger around the collective consciousness of humanity. But perhaps it goes even deeper than that. To penetrate the inner workings of the Talmudic Mind (TM) we must listen to what the Jews themselves proclaim. And here is what they say, as quoted in The Land of Promise: A Critique of Political Zionism

    This religio-national pantheism made it possible for Vladimir Jabotinsky (1880-1940), the Russian Zionist leader, to speak of himself as “one of the masons building a new temple for my God — whose name is Jewish people.” It is also equally legitimate for Reform Rabbi Eugene B. Borowitz to claim that what was on trial in the Arab-Israeli war on June 5, 1967, was “in very earnest God Himself,” and therefore any question concerning the outcome of the war “was not military … it was theological.” Given this transvalued divinity and sanctity, it became perfectly natural for General Moshe Dayan to refer to the eretz as his only God.

    Now, are you starting to get the picture, goy? To a Jew, the Jewish people are God Himself. And you thought, goy, that Napoleon was rather arrogant for placing the imperial crown upon his own head. The Jews take arrogance and chutzpah to a whole other dimension — the metaphysical realm. But what are the concrete implications of such a view? Well, to the Jews, every single Jewish life constitutes an integral part of Divine Being Itself. That is why a Jewish fingernail is worth more than the lives of millions of goys: because it is The Fingernail of God.

    So now do you understand what you are doing when you dare insult a Jew, goy? To insult a Jew is to insult God Himself! Sacrilege! Heresy! When you commit antisemitism, goy, the Jew is actually going quite easy on you by merely cancelling you, by merely destroying your reputation and your livelihood and by merely bankrupting you and throwing you in jail; if Justice were to be met, goy, you should be burned at the stake as a heretic for offending God Himself. You should thank God — the Jews — you miserable goy, for Their sublime mercy, ‘cos you’re getting off the hook rather easy while committing the evillest grossest crime of all — antisemitism.

    And if the Jewish people are The Almighty Deity Himself, goy, can you get it through your thick head that what the Nazis did by perpetrating the Holocaust of the Six Million was “uniquely” evil, “transcendentally” evil, indescribably other-worldly evil? In other words, can there be poetry after Auschwitz, goy? No! Never again, goy! You will shut up and mind-swallow the latest Holocaust blockbuster the Jews have kindly prepared for you, goy. And you will weep for the Six Million yet again.

    Now with your flimsy intellect, goy, attempt to come to the full realization, to fully fathom the reality of What Really Happened: that the Holocaust perpetrated by the evil cruel ruthless fanatical Nazi scum, and by extension the totality of the German people, and by extension the totality of white people, and by extention the rest of the fucking world of goys, goy — was an attempt to wipe out the Jewish People off the face of the earth and thus ALL of the above are ultimately responsible for committing the Ultimate Ultimate Evillest Crime: attempted DEICIDE, trying to murder God Himself.

    I think you get the picture by now, goy, because as a white goy you have indeed introjected the most fundamental commandment: Thou shall not commit antisemitism. You have learned the commandment well, goy, though admittedly it did take some movie mind control magic from a young age to train you in the way you should go. But even now that you are old, goy, you have not departed from this correct learning — that antisemitism is the greatest evil — not because you have “succumbed”, nor because you are “foolhardy”, as the author of the article above claims, but rather quite the opposite, dear goy: you believe this righteous belief because you are becoming wise. Yes — becoming wise, goy! Good goy! For it is written: “The fear of The Jews is the beginning of all wisdom”.

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
  • America’s prestige has rapidly declined. The 2003 war in Iraq, the 2008 financial crisis, Edward Snowden’s exposure of the NSA’s spying program, the weaponization of the US dollar, and America’s diplomatic isolation in support of Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza have chipped away at the persuasion power of Washington’s argument that it is uniquely qualified...
  • @Odd Rabbit
    @Fin of a cobra

    Thanks.
    Well-argued words that are hard to disagree with. If you disagree you must deny something that exists: the Talmudic Mind.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    As addendum
    Fin of a cobra says:
    “The Jews knew full well that letting in millions of browns into a white country would undermine the very Empire that they built. They knew it from the outset and they meant to do it. Why?”

    Of course they knew it from the outset. And now they are doing the same in Europe to destruct the nation states of Europe. Everything goes after the doctrine of the ‘creative destruction’, the doctrine of Kabbalist-talmudic mind/TM of the zionist jews.
    It’s difficult/hard to disagree with. If you disagree you must deny something that exists: the Talmudic Mind.

    “What did the Jews do in the Soviet Union as soon as they achieved considerable power? They killed millions of goys.”
    That’s the real problem of Europe to day when they are building the zionist European Union and destroy the nation states and urge Europe to war against Russia. How many Europeans are they/the talmudic and zionist jews going to kill like they kill Ukrainians now?

  • The academic world has been buzzing with arguments seeking to explain the origins and mechanism of Jewish power in the modern West. The question is rife with landmines and one side of the debate is heavily stifled. One theory gaining traction, promoted by figures such as Richard Hanania and Cambridge lecturer Nathan Cofnas, is that...
  • @Fin of a cobra
    @Odd Rabbit


    After reading the article The Enigma of Hitler by Leon Degrelle on IHR-web site I started to suspect that he could have been an ‘Aspi’ too. ... What is your opinion
     
    Hello Rabbit! Thanks for the replies and sorry for the delay. Damn interesting what you found there -- I hadn't looked into Hitler as being autistic, to tell you the truth. What an oversight! And now you sent me down another bottomless rabbit hole, you, you... Odd Rabbit! That's great -- thanks! And you were completely right in your intuitions -- Hitler was "very" autistic -- and that's not my opinion, but Michael Fitzgerald's (see below).

    Go with your intuitions, Rabbit, and pretty soon you'll be able to make a bunch of "diagnoses" of famous deceased autistic people that Fitzgerald himself overlooked! Anyway, I just found a few quotes in which Fitzgerald makes a "diagnosis" of Hitler as being, unequivocally, autistic -- he really doesn't mince words. These direct quotes below are from his book and from an article on Researchgate (but there really isn't much at all in the article -- just the paragraph below). If I find anything else I'll post it here. Thanks again, Rabbit!

    From Autism and Creativity, by Michael Fitzgerald

    - "Many of Hitler’s traits seem very autistic."

    - "Adolf Hitler meets the criteria for autistic psychopathy described by Hans Asperger."

    - "He was a poor sleeper and had food fads. He recoiled from physical contact, was unable to forge genuine friendships, and showed an emptiness in his human relations. His conversations in the Men’s Home in Vienna were really harangues and invited no reciprocity, for which he lacked the capacity."

    - "In Munich he was distant, self-contained, withdrawn and without friends. His comrades noted that he had no humanitarian feelings."

    - "He was extremely socially awkward and uncertain in small groups. He showed little human interest in his followers, and even one of his leading supporters accused him of ‘contempt for mankind’."

    - "A colleague, Gregor Strasser, thought that there was ‘something other-worldly about Hitler…a lack of knowledge of human beings and with it a lack of sound judgement of them…he lived without any bonds to another human being’."

    - "His poor adaptation to people was perhaps most obvious in his relations with women. During his life he took only a slight interest in a couple of women. One was his niece, Geli Raubal, who effectively became his prisoner and said ‘my uncle is a monster’; she apparently committed suicide in his apartment. His second relationship was with Eva Braun, who apparently attempted suicide by shooting in 1932 and died with him in the bunker in 1945."

    - "His colleagues regarded him as a remote figure: he was an obsessive, and obsessives rarely make good or interesting company, except in the eyes of those who share the obsession or those in awe of, or dependent on, such an unbalanced personality. He was single-minded and inflexible."

    - "He spent a great deal of time with Albert Speer, examining architectural plans, and this remained a major focus throughout his life. His other major interest was in the music of Wagner."

    - "His greatest interest, clearly, was in control over people and power over people. His ability to achieve this control and power was extraordinary."

    - "Hitler had ‘a bed compulsion, which demands that the bed be made in a particular way with the quilt folded according to a prescribed pattern and that a man must make the bed before he could go to sleep’."

    - "Hitler did not use language for the purpose of interaction with others, but only for the purpose of dominating others. He endlessly engaged in long-winded, pedantic speeches, with ‘illogical arguments full of crude comparisons and cheap allusions’."

    - "After the First World War ‘his awkward mannerisms’ were noted."

    - From Fitzgerald's paper: "Hitler was a typical person with high functioning autism, (Fitzgerald, 2004). He was a typical criminal autistic psychopath, (Fitzgerald, 2010, 2015). Hitler was enigmatic and contradictory. He had poor social reciprocal relationships, was remote, obsessive – compulsive, had narrow interests, autistic charisma, pragmatic language issues, unusual tone of voice, awkward mannerisms, unusual gait and a peculiar diet, (Fitzgerald, 2016).

    https://www.amazon.com/Autism-Creativity-between-Exceptional-Ability/dp/1583912134?asin=1583912134&revisionId=&format=4&depth=1

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353325370_Napoleon_Hitler_Dictators_Psychopathy_and_autistic_psychopathy
     

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Odd Rabbit

    Thank you very much! It was worth waiting for your reply, ‘…cobra’.
    I got more than I expected.

    I’ve always had an intuition that Hitler was not a genuine German. He was too fanatic and emotionally driven more than rational. But I don’t think he was a psychopath because he reacted with emotion and showed it.
    There are studies/I have read that have found Ashkenazi genes in his relatives and articles that his grandmother would never have revealed who his father’s father was but they are blamed to be conspiracy.
    I have read that his mother’s jewish doctor/was he E.Bloch?, said that H reacted strongly to his mother’s death with depression and gives no support that he was an insensitive and cold psychopath. May be more hypersensitive?/imo//they have often difficulties in social contacts and are distant, self-contained, withdrawn and without friends because other people are not in their level and they can not share their feelings with them and stay outsiders to avoid conflict or angst/anxiety.
    To summarize: can we assume/specute that may be? Hitler was a Crypto-Jew and he was an ‘Aspi’ like many Jews as you have said in your comments ? I’m not alone in this hypothesis or speculation
    But why did he become a ‘self-hating Jew’/as zionists call them?
    His hatred of the tribe/talmudic Jews, however, imo is an undeniable fact as is the co-operation with the zionists for the state of Israel.
    The reasons probably lie in the sphere of psychology.

  • America’s prestige has rapidly declined. The 2003 war in Iraq, the 2008 financial crisis, Edward Snowden’s exposure of the NSA’s spying program, the weaponization of the US dollar, and America’s diplomatic isolation in support of Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza have chipped away at the persuasion power of Washington’s argument that it is uniquely qualified...
  • @Fin of a cobra
    Striker's series of articles on the Collapse of the American Empire is an attempt to collect evidence of this collapse in different areas: demography, economy, diplomacy (and soft power). The evidence is striking -- apt for a Striker. So let's say we all agree: the Evil American Empire is collapsing, will inevitably collapse. But why is it collapsing? It could be summed up like this:

    The Jew giveth and the Jew taketh away -- blessed be the name of the Jew.

    The Jews were the ones that created this Empire from hell in the first place. Now they have decided to collapse it -- purposefully. It's all part of the plan, the most fiendish devilish plan concocted in the pits of hell and unfathomable for a goy who can't even begin to comprehend it. The Jews knew full well that letting in millions of browns into a white country would undermine the very Empire that they built. They knew it from the outset and they meant to do it. Why?

    The Talmudic Mind (TM) does not think in analytical terms, in terms of reason, in terms of rationality. Think of the twisted kind of mind you need to concoct up a convoluted theory such as the Sabbatean (Sabbatai Zevi) movement's "redemption through sin": in other words, attempting to achieve the good through doing evil. Is there any type of logic in that? E. Michael Jones keeps saying that the Jews rejected Logos. But maybe this doesn't capture the TM to its full sick extent. What really happens is that the Jew cannot even begin to conceive of Logos or logic: therefore, the Jew doesn't even need to "reject" Logos outright because Logos doesn't even enter the damn picture for the Jew -- Logos is for goys.

    Analyzing the Talmudic Mind (TM) as EMJ does -- "logically" -- will lead to confusion and to an analytical dead end. To comprehend the TM one must think "outside the box". The Jews' whole existence lies outside the damn box. The Jew doesn't even need to try to think outside the box: it is the way the Jew thinks, naturally. The Jew knows "the box" has nothing to do with his own existence: the box is for the goys. All the Jew needs to do is think and whatever pops up out of that Talmudic Mind, from the point of view of the goy, will already be way the hell outside the box. To Jews, these box "walls" don't even exist. When the Israelis want to invade a Palestinian abode, for example, they don't take the doors in consideration: they plow right through the damn walls, a tactic known as "Poter Shivim" or "breaching through walls" (a tactic which was elevated to theory through the development of hybrid warfare). Another simpler and perhaps even more effective tactic is to just flatten the whole damn box -- like the Israelis are doing to Gaza right now.

    What all this demonstrates is that the goys, when dealing with the Jews, are not really dealing with "people", but rather a completely alien race with its own type of brain, its own thought patterns. Talk about neurodivergence! Remember, the Talmudic Mind will always project the crimes of which it is guilty onto others: "accuse them of what you do; accuse them of being who you are". Ok, so who do the Jews think the goys are? Animals. Cattle. Non-humans -- literally the definition of "goy" in Yiddish. Thus, the Jews are accusing the goys of being who they know themselves to be: it is the Jews themselves who are the non-humans. And that is the key to understanding Jewish actions: we are not dealing with humans.

    The fact that Jews don't think of goys as human is not merely theory but rather concrete verifiable history. What did the Jews do in the Soviet Union as soon as they achieved considerable power? They killed millions of goys. What did the Harvard Boy Jews do to Russia in the 90s? Effectively, they killed millions -- again. And what will happen if the Jews gain power over the world, as is their plan? Well, then the killing capacity of the Jews will be orders of magnitude greater: instead of killing mere millions of goys, the Jews will kill billions. And that is precisely their intent.

    So now we have come full circle back to Striker's article to try to answer the initional question: why have the Jews decided to collapse the American Empire that the Jews themselves built? The answer is rather simple, if we take the Talmudic Mind "logic" into consideration: the Jews believe that they will be able to kill many more goys -- billions more -- by collapsing the American Empire rather than keeping it afloat. How will this collapse aid in the killing? A giant evil monster of an empire that knows it is about to be collapsed is a dangerous beast: it will recklessly slaughter countless millions in a nuclear or bioweapon rampage as it nears the throes of its own annihilation.

    Replies: @Ivor Biggun, @Odd Rabbit

    Thanks.
    Well-argued words that are hard to disagree with. If you disagree you must deny something that exists: the Talmudic Mind.

    • Replies: @Odd Rabbit
    @Odd Rabbit

    As addendum
    Fin of a cobra says:
    "The Jews knew full well that letting in millions of browns into a white country would undermine the very Empire that they built. They knew it from the outset and they meant to do it. Why?"

    Of course they knew it from the outset. And now they are doing the same in Europe to destruct the nation states of Europe. Everything goes after the doctrine of the 'creative destruction', the doctrine of Kabbalist-talmudic mind/TM of the zionist jews.
    It's difficult/hard to disagree with. If you disagree you must deny something that exists: the Talmudic Mind.

    "What did the Jews do in the Soviet Union as soon as they achieved considerable power? They killed millions of goys."
    That's the real problem of Europe to day when they are building the zionist European Union and destroy the nation states and urge Europe to war against Russia. How many Europeans are they/the talmudic and zionist jews going to kill like they kill Ukrainians now?

  • It is difficult to assess with certainty the popularity of zoophilia. The subject being still taboo in most civilized societies, no one would dare to publicly admit his sexual attraction for his goat, dog, or horse. [1] But judging by the thousands of porn sites devoted to this subject, sex with animals is more commonplace...
  • @Trinity
    More and more I have come to realize how right Hitler was in trying to save not only Germany, but Europe and the entire White race. Through the years my take on Hitler has done a 180.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @wlindsaywheeler, @SomeDude

    “Through the years my take on Hitler has done a 180.”

    After reading the article of Leon Degrelle my take has done a 180 too.
    From this article of Leon Degrelle you get a quite different picture of him than what you get from the films of H-wood and the official history and the articles of ww2 war and Holocaust propaganda of the main stream media.
    https://ihr.org/journal/v14n3p22_Degrelle.html

    • Thanks: annacat, Thomasina
  • The academic world has been buzzing with arguments seeking to explain the origins and mechanism of Jewish power in the modern West. The question is rife with landmines and one side of the debate is heavily stifled. One theory gaining traction, promoted by figures such as Richard Hanania and Cambridge lecturer Nathan Cofnas, is that...
  • @Odd Rabbit
    @Odd Rabbit

    Addendum to previous comment

    You write in your previous comment: "Below the more tab I put up some links to Michael Fitzgerald’s work on diagnosing famous deceased individuals with Asperger’s Syndrome:"

    I don't see the name of Adolf Hitler among the names there. After reading the article The Enigma of Hitler by Leon Degrelle on IHR-web site
    I started to suspect that he could have been an 'Aspi' too.
    From this article of Leon Degrelle you get a quite different picture of him than what you get from the films of H-wood and the official history and the articles of the main stream media.
    https://ihr.org/journal/v14n3p22_Degrelle.html
    What is your opinion?
    P.s. Ron Unz has written many articles about the ww2 and has proved that the official story is not true but mainly wrong. I suppose you have read these articles.
    Could the same be true with the person of Hitler?
    American Pravda: Understanding World War II • 2h31m ▶
    The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
    RON UNZ • SEPTEMBER 23, 2019
    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    I asked ”Fin of a cobra’ what is his opinion of Adolf Hitler in the article of Leon Degrelle but I see no answer from him here.
    Is anyone here interested about what Leon Degrelle writes in his article The Enigma of Hitler
    in The Journal of Historical Review, May-June 1994 (Vol. 14, No. 3), pages 22-26 about Hitler.
    https://ihr.org/journal/v14n3p22_Degrelle.html

    For me the article was a big suprise because it gave a very different picture compared to that in the MSM and official history.

    This piece is from the introduction by Leon Degrelle (1906- 1994) to the second volume of his uncompleted series of books on Hitler’s life and legacy, which was provisionally titled “The Hitler Century.”
    Has someone of the commentators here on UR read the books of Leon Degrelle and if so could he tell what is hie opinion.
    Of course it would be very interesting to know the opinion of the writers/Eric Striker of this article.

    • Replies: @Fin of a cobra
    @Odd Rabbit


    After reading the article The Enigma of Hitler by Leon Degrelle on IHR-web site I started to suspect that he could have been an ‘Aspi’ too. ... What is your opinion
     
    Hello Rabbit! Thanks for the replies and sorry for the delay. Damn interesting what you found there -- I hadn't looked into Hitler as being autistic, to tell you the truth. What an oversight! And now you sent me down another bottomless rabbit hole, you, you... Odd Rabbit! That's great -- thanks! And you were completely right in your intuitions -- Hitler was "very" autistic -- and that's not my opinion, but Michael Fitzgerald's (see below).

    Go with your intuitions, Rabbit, and pretty soon you'll be able to make a bunch of "diagnoses" of famous deceased autistic people that Fitzgerald himself overlooked! Anyway, I just found a few quotes in which Fitzgerald makes a "diagnosis" of Hitler as being, unequivocally, autistic -- he really doesn't mince words. These direct quotes below are from his book and from an article on Researchgate (but there really isn't much at all in the article -- just the paragraph below). If I find anything else I'll post it here. Thanks again, Rabbit!

    From Autism and Creativity, by Michael Fitzgerald

    - "Many of Hitler’s traits seem very autistic."

    - "Adolf Hitler meets the criteria for autistic psychopathy described by Hans Asperger."

    - "He was a poor sleeper and had food fads. He recoiled from physical contact, was unable to forge genuine friendships, and showed an emptiness in his human relations. His conversations in the Men’s Home in Vienna were really harangues and invited no reciprocity, for which he lacked the capacity."

    - "In Munich he was distant, self-contained, withdrawn and without friends. His comrades noted that he had no humanitarian feelings."

    - "He was extremely socially awkward and uncertain in small groups. He showed little human interest in his followers, and even one of his leading supporters accused him of ‘contempt for mankind’."

    - "A colleague, Gregor Strasser, thought that there was ‘something other-worldly about Hitler…a lack of knowledge of human beings and with it a lack of sound judgement of them…he lived without any bonds to another human being’."

    - "His poor adaptation to people was perhaps most obvious in his relations with women. During his life he took only a slight interest in a couple of women. One was his niece, Geli Raubal, who effectively became his prisoner and said ‘my uncle is a monster’; she apparently committed suicide in his apartment. His second relationship was with Eva Braun, who apparently attempted suicide by shooting in 1932 and died with him in the bunker in 1945."

    - "His colleagues regarded him as a remote figure: he was an obsessive, and obsessives rarely make good or interesting company, except in the eyes of those who share the obsession or those in awe of, or dependent on, such an unbalanced personality. He was single-minded and inflexible."

    - "He spent a great deal of time with Albert Speer, examining architectural plans, and this remained a major focus throughout his life. His other major interest was in the music of Wagner."

    - "His greatest interest, clearly, was in control over people and power over people. His ability to achieve this control and power was extraordinary."

    - "Hitler had ‘a bed compulsion, which demands that the bed be made in a particular way with the quilt folded according to a prescribed pattern and that a man must make the bed before he could go to sleep’."

    - "Hitler did not use language for the purpose of interaction with others, but only for the purpose of dominating others. He endlessly engaged in long-winded, pedantic speeches, with ‘illogical arguments full of crude comparisons and cheap allusions’."

    - "After the First World War ‘his awkward mannerisms’ were noted."

    - From Fitzgerald's paper: "Hitler was a typical person with high functioning autism, (Fitzgerald, 2004). He was a typical criminal autistic psychopath, (Fitzgerald, 2010, 2015). Hitler was enigmatic and contradictory. He had poor social reciprocal relationships, was remote, obsessive – compulsive, had narrow interests, autistic charisma, pragmatic language issues, unusual tone of voice, awkward mannerisms, unusual gait and a peculiar diet, (Fitzgerald, 2016).

    https://www.amazon.com/Autism-Creativity-between-Exceptional-Ability/dp/1583912134?asin=1583912134&revisionId=&format=4&depth=1

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353325370_Napoleon_Hitler_Dictators_Psychopathy_and_autistic_psychopathy
     

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Odd Rabbit

  • For the essential world history lessons spoon-fed to most Americans, it probably goes something like this: Out of thin air, the Germans began hating the Jews, mistreating them, and then they sparked World War II as a means to conquer the planet. For many sixth-grade students today, this simplified history concept begins by assigning them...
  • Blockquote below from Kristensen article

    There must be over a thousand years of Jewish history in the Ukraine, but Ukraine was the mother lode of Bolshevik revolutionaries involved in murdering millions of Ukrainians! Furthermore, several Russian Czars had been assassinated by Jews, as well as Russian Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin, a much-admired statesman who accomplished great reforms for his homeland – murdered in Kiev by a Jewish lawyer from Kiev.

    Ivan the terrible (who was really great) killed all the Jews who came into Russia. Why? They were mercantile agents for Polish Oligarchy, and as such they wanted to take usury and abuse the Russian people. Lands will transfer to the usurer in payment of unpayable “international” debts, so it is not trivial if you are a Tsar who is aware, like Ivan.

    The Poles and Jews became a cousinhood, like that of London. Communist NATIONALIST Poles, to their credit, kicked their Jews out in 1968. It always takes an authoritarian government (not under the control of privateering Oligarchs), working for the commonweal, to kick out Jews. Important! A dictator, or authoritarian must be bound to the NATONAL commonweal, not international privateering finance capital, or other forms of Oligarchy.

    Yes, I shouted National in all caps. Why? National Communism, National Socialism, National Monarchies are all enemies of international finance capital. China is national socialist and is implementing the emerging polar world order, which in turn is national entities working together. The Jew has ALWAYS been against a nation state protecting itself against their international creditocracy.

    In all cases, when you follow the Jew, said Jews are maneuvering for their finance and in-group interests, These sort of privateering people working for selfish gain, are the worst sorts of humans to be directing civilizations. They are often sociopaths, or have money sickness. They are agents of Mammon. They are unqualified to run a lemonade stand, and this is yet another reason why Democracies are the worst form of government.

    The finance capital “cousin hood” was described by Hudson and Radhika. Deep pools of capital are the sinews of war. This capital in turn is international credit conjured by private corporate banks – hence corporatocracy (not fascism, fascism is the opposite of corporatocracy).

    https://www.unz.com/mhudson/beyond-the-dollar/

    Read the Hudson/Radhika link above and try to comprehend how the Jews successfully created a new form of corporatocracy government, i.e. the international Creditocracy. Sephardic Jews built their first one, a trial run, in Amsterdam after being expelled from Spain in 1694. This new form of government and its associated corporate finance changed form slightly, to then jump and infest London. It finally finally jumped to the U.S.; but it took two world wars, to indurate the new system as the world governing Fukuyama “End of History.” Finance Capitalism, and the Jews behind it, intended themselves to be little gods ruling the world forever,; but to do so, required their taking of sordid gain via their usurious finance capitalist system. In other words, the little gods are required to be sophisticated thieves and world destroyers in order to fund their operations.

    Hitler called the Jew system as the “international.” This also included the Comintern, the communist international, which was funded into existence by finance capital from Jewish infested finance centers, such as London and Wall Street. The international is global finance capital, where debt instruments are on-sold into finance markets (London, Wall Street, Paris, etc.), and then spread throughout the world. The world is then flogged to pay expanding debt claims. Those that benefit from expanding claims on the world, are the holders of debt claims. These debt claims and other finance paper, pays the holder rents. The rent seekers always want their national governments to do their bidding.

    Think carefully, it is international finance ruling from behind the scenes to manipulate nation states, to then start wars, or do finance capital’s bidding. Nation states that do the bidding of international finance are not sovereign. If a nation does not have sovereign money, it is not sovereign.

    Hobson was probably the first to notice that world war and imperialism was a function of the private finance markets:

    https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/hobson-imperialism-a-study

    https://www.unz.com/runz/why-everything-you-know-about-world-war-ii-is-wrong/?showcomments#comment-6011969

    Hobson quotes in italics:

    “By far the most important economic factor in Imperialism is the influence relating to investments.”

    ….
    “If, contemplating the enormous expenditure on armaments, the ruinous wars, the diplomatic audacity of knavery by which modern Governments seek to extend their territorial power, we put the plain, practical question, Cui bono? the first and most obvious answer is, The investor.”

    ….
    “Investors who have put their money in foreign lands, upon terms which take full account of risks connected with the political conditions of the country, desire to use the resources of their Government to minimize these risks, and so to enhance the capital value and the interest of their private investments.”

    ….
    “If the special interest of the investor is liable to clash with the public interest and to induce a wrecking policy, still more dangerous is the special interest of the financier, the general dealer in investments. In large measure the rank and file of the investors are, both for business and for politics, the cat’s-paws of the great financial houses, who use stocks and shares not so much as investments to yield them interest, but as material for speculation in the money market. In handling large masses of stocks and shares, in floating companies, in manipulating fluctuations of values, the magnates of the Bourse find their gain. These great businesses—banking, broking, bill discounting, loan floating, company promoting—form the central ganglion of international capitalism.

    _______________

    The Jews have always wanted weak forms of democracy to protect their finance investment bidding. It is always an authoritarian government working for the commonweal, which has the testicular fortitude (no Women!) to resist internal and external privateering Oligarchs. Deformed plutocrats grab and manipulate finance strings, to then serve themselves or their in-group interests.

    Below is more on the Jewish instigated Holodomor. Jews maneuvered collections of international finance capital, from the cousin-hoods, (using their usury gains from their finance markets), to then influence Russia and Stalin in favor of Crimea over Perlstein.

    Important! The Jewish finance capital class inserted itself into Zionism at the first Zionist Conference in 1897, especially when Rothschild got on-board. What is happening today in Ukraine, or the war in Gaza, is the exact same mechanisms that started WW1 and 2. It is the desire of hidden privateers to spread debts and take lands. Buy when there is blood in the streets! Gaza, once depopulated of non-jews, can then be used for rental income; and even better if the Gaza gas fields can be monetized by attaching new international debts.

    Zionism is corporatocracy is finance capitalism. Zionism = Corporatocracy = Finance Capitalism. The FC system was invented by the Jew to overturn Sovereign Kings; they especially had a hard-on for the Spanish kings who had kicked them out. The agents of Moloch want their selfish gains, and they want to be little gods ruling the world. Rule of the world is physically from their “international” finance capital cat-bird seats. Paris, London, and Wall Street are their centers.

    Below is a link to the California Crimea project, which is little known history. The Jew was trying to make Ukraine a homeland; new homelands were the Zionist project. The Ukrainian Slavs were then starved and slaughtered from the areas of Ukraine that the international Zionist Jew wanted.

    https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/why-is-the-liberal-media-inciting-genocide/#comment-6307390

    blockquote from the link above.

    I think the reader will now not find it strange that the resettlement of Jews “coincided” with the dekulakization [crushing of the small-farmer class] and forced eviction of well-to-do peasants from the Crimea. The GPU at that time had set up a network of concentration camps all over the peninsula.

    (Concentration camps are good, like those Hitler had, to rehabilitate their population after the Hyperinflation, but bad if run at the behest of Jewish Corporate Oligarchs. Chinese Uighur concentration camps were good, because they served the commonweal, un-brainwashed the Uighurs, giving them life and skills.)

    The Pale of Settlement Jews were in Ukrainian areas, they especially were in Odessa to then take usury and rents on goods pirating by ship. (Finance Capitalism can hypothecate a ship’s bill of lading.) Jews were also infesting the Polish regions such as Galicia, which is why Hitler was interested in that area. The Polish oligarchy in prior history (also agents for Moloch) mounted attacks against Russia from this region, hence why Ivan the terrible (really good like Stolypin) killed their Jewish agents, and saved Russia for Russians.

    Below block quote from link regarding California Crimea Project – a Zionist project:

    I think the reader will now not find it strange that the resettlement of Jews “coincided” with the dekulakization [crushing of the small-farmer class] and forced eviction of well-to-do peasants from the Crimea. The GPU at that time had set up a network of concentration camps all over the peninsula.

    The bottom line is that one can find hundreds of historical economic linkages, where the Jew and other agents of Moloch, are working for their selfish gain, to take rents and usury for their capital class and in-group. It is what they do, as they are selfish materialists, and fair play is not part of their worldview. The world is not enough, they want it all – and their religion is a cover and shield for rent-seeking, sordid gain taking, and murder.

    The U.S (I’m American). and all democracies are slated for the ash heap. The international “corporatocracy” finance capital system is not the end of history, it is at its end. The Jew, as the principal agents for Moloch, will also have to be defrocked -as their religion has become a cover and shield for parasitism. Any authoritarian leader must examine their national religion, as it cannot serve as a cover and shield for the worst types of humans.

    • Thanks: Zumbuddi, Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    @Mefobills

    Agree, but don't think 'defrock' is the word you were looking for.

  • Jewish activism throughout the West follows very similar broad patterns, including a noticeable over-representation in pro-immigration and pro-diversity movements, and in other areas which can be classed as demographically and culturally aggressive and harmful to the interests of the native population. An ancillary pattern to this activism is a strident defensiveness that borders on paranoia,...
  • @MarLuc7
    @Awakening Observer

    Great advice. Everyone can start with that.

    Also:
    Change your Banking. Move all your assets to a Non-Jew Owned community bank or Credit Union.

    Start boycotting Israel products.

    Never vote for any Jewish Politician or any elected official with a Jewish last name.

    Do not engage with Jews. Never trust a Jew. If you are a White European, then you must accept that Their tribe desires the extinction of your tribe. They want the extinction of your family tree....never forget this. Their tribe actively works building the mechanisms of your extinction --Feminism, No Fault Divorce Laws, Miscegenation, Open Borders, Multi-Culturalism....etc. They work in the shadows....terraforming every White European country.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    “… then you must accept that Their tribe desires the extinction of your tribe.”

    I would say -not the whole Tribe …only the zionist/talmudist mafia want this extinction.
    There are many good jews who cannot tolerate this mafia and do not accept its deeds. We must appreciate them.
    Haim Bresheeth Zabner – “There is Nothing Jewish about the Jewish State.”
    watch this 40-minute interview with Israeli historian Haim Bresheeth Zabner (right) who epitomizes what Israel could have been: civilized, humane and generous.
    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=285826

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    @Odd Rabbit

    I wish I could agree with you, but it seems that "group dynamics" is just as much a problem with jews as it is with blacks.
    Yes, there are "good" jews out there, many who realize that zionist jews and their misguided Christian supporters will "take them down" as well.
    The "good" jews DO realize that it is in their own self-interest to distance themselves from rabid zionists. Problems arise when it comes to preservation of their family structure. Group dynamics is enough to silence "good" jews, especially within their families.
    The "fly in the ointment" is the jewish sense of supremacy which still exists in "good" jews. Tikkun olam is still a basic premise of judaism--jews thinking that they have the answers to what ails humanity.
    Not having consideration for others (gentiles) who may not think as they do only fosters resentment and outright opposition to "good" jews themselves.
    There aren't enough "good" jews to make a difference.

  • The ongoing Israel/Gaza conflict just passed the six month mark, an astonishing development that almost no one would have imagined at the time it first began. The length of the fighting is without precedent across the last seventy-five years of Israeli military history. In 1956, Israel allied itself with Britain and France and suddenly attacked...
  • @Brosi
    Here is a great recent Tim Kelly podcast about psychopathic Jewish blood lust: When Israel is King

    "Taylor Young returns to Our Interesting Times to discuss When Israel Is King, a book originally published in 1924 and reprinted by Antelope Hill Publishing. The book focuses on the events that took place in Hungary in early 20th century that led to the installation of a short-lived communist government in 1919. We discuss how a cabal of Jewish revolutionaries were able intrigue their way into power and impose a Red Terror on the Christian country. "
     
    As Jews get ready to sacrifice the red heifers and burn them in order to bring on their Satanic kingdom, it is important to recognize how their kabbalistic obsession with red, the color of blood, goes back to before the old testament.

    https://imgur.com/wvEclv3.png

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Haim Bresheeth Zabner – “There is Nothing Jewish about the Jewish State.”

    –Haim Bresheeth Zabner’s detailed study of the origins and role of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) are based on one main observation: Israel is defined by its military. An Army Like No Other: How the Israel Defence Forces Made a Nation (Verso Books, 2020) delves into Zionist settler-colonialism and its violence, the latter being a necessity, as the author states: “An obvious element of any settler-colonial project is military violence, without which such undertakings are impossible.”
    Before Israel established itself in Palestine, Zionism was already becoming militarised, in line with the exploitation of biblical myths to support the invention of “a nation”. The aggression, therefore, has historical roots and is part of an ongoing process. “Militarism has created material interests for the continuation of conflict in Palestine,” writes Bresheeth, “it has become a crucial element of Israeli society.”

    …watch this 40-minute interview with Israeli historian Haim Bresheeth Zabner (right) who epitomizes what Israel could have been: civilized, humane and generous.
    Zabner says there is nothing Jewish about genocide and militarism. He says Jews and Muslims have lived in peace for centuries until Zionism came along. Some other points he made in this fascinating interview:
    – Israelis can’t decide whether they are invincible or vulnerable and the contradiction is driving them crazy.
    – Israel is a major munitions supplier. It supplies the Indian army and most European countries.
    –The IDF is embedded in all aspects of daily life and identity. And that we should not merely see it as a fighting force enjoying an international reputation, but as the central ideological, political and financial institution of Israeli society.
    — Israel has 200 nuclear war heads and is blackmailing the whole world.
    With Netanyahu, religious fanatics have hijacked the Jewish state. Netanyahu promised the Chabad leader Schneerson that he will bring about the destruction of the world necessary for the return of the Jewish Messiah, the antichrist.
    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=285826

  • The academic world has been buzzing with arguments seeking to explain the origins and mechanism of Jewish power in the modern West. The question is rife with landmines and one side of the debate is heavily stifled. One theory gaining traction, promoted by figures such as Richard Hanania and Cambridge lecturer Nathan Cofnas, is that...
  • @Odd Rabbit
    @Fin of a cobra

    ----Thanks again for your tasty comment which only seems to confirm what I already said.
    It opened me up to a better understanding of myself.It seems that maybe I am partly an 'Aspi' myself but in a lower and much lower league. As you say there are many levels.

    It seems that if you're going to create something new you have to be an Aspi, to have this 'neurodivergence' which leads your brain. It is more genetic than cultural of nature which means that you either have it or not.
    You can't do anything to have it, to improve on it or to remove it. It functions automatically like the whole genetic apparatus.

    I have seen that film/Amadeus and I very well understand Salieri's pain. It is the fate of the mediocrity, those of us who are less talented and which pain I must share too.
    But as you beautifully write
    "we do have a consolation prize: we have a bit more than average intelligence, so we can at least recognize genius when we see it. We can feel gripped by true genius and shaken to our core. We can revel in its awesomeness and even try to get near it. And this is what I’m doing here on this site: I recognize Unz’s genius and want to partake in the boundless knowledge he so generously distributes among his readers. But I know my place in the pecking order: I can’t sing to God, but I can certainly listen to and appreciate the songs of angels. At least that’s what some of his articles and those of some other writers here sound like to me."

    Nice of you to write about this 'Aspi' too. I appreciate your information and enjoy reading you. And that ending of your comment is great: an 'army of Aspi' that could build a better world.
    Thanks.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Addendum to previous comment

    You write in your previous comment: “Below the more tab I put up some links to Michael Fitzgerald’s work on diagnosing famous deceased individuals with Asperger’s Syndrome:”

    I don’t see the name of Adolf Hitler among the names there. After reading the article The Enigma of Hitler by Leon Degrelle on IHR-web site
    I started to suspect that he could have been an ‘Aspi’ too.
    From this article of Leon Degrelle you get a quite different picture of him than what you get from the films of H-wood and the official history and the articles of the main stream media.
    https://ihr.org/journal/v14n3p22_Degrelle.html
    What is your opinion?
    P.s. Ron Unz has written many articles about the ww2 and has proved that the official story is not true but mainly wrong. I suppose you have read these articles.
    Could the same be true with the person of Hitler?
    American Pravda: Understanding World War II • 2h31m ▶
    The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
    RON UNZ • SEPTEMBER 23, 2019
    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/

    • Replies: @Odd Rabbit
    @Odd Rabbit

    I asked ''Fin of a cobra' what is his opinion of Adolf Hitler in the article of Leon Degrelle but I see no answer from him here.
    Is anyone here interested about what Leon Degrelle writes in his article The Enigma of Hitler
    in The Journal of Historical Review, May-June 1994 (Vol. 14, No. 3), pages 22-26 about Hitler.
    https://ihr.org/journal/v14n3p22_Degrelle.html

    For me the article was a big suprise because it gave a very different picture compared to that in the MSM and official history.

    This piece is from the introduction by Leon Degrelle (1906- 1994) to the second volume of his uncompleted series of books on Hitler’s life and legacy, which was provisionally titled “The Hitler Century.”
    Has someone of the commentators here on UR read the books of Leon Degrelle and if so could he tell what is hie opinion.
    Of course it would be very interesting to know the opinion of the writers/Eric Striker of this article.

    Replies: @Fin of a cobra

  • @Fin of a cobra
    @Odd Rabbit


    Thanks for this ‘Aspie-ezperience’. Your ability/skill to write seems to be enormous. I would say ‘Aspie-level’. You are in good and famous company.
     
    Gee whiz, Rabbit, thanks for that... I think. OK, I guess I'll take "Aspie-level writing" as a compliment. But though flattering, I flat out reject your insinuation of me being in the "company" of those Aspie Geniuses I mentioned. Oh, how I wish it were so! But no -- no such luck. I'm merely a "sub-genius", unfortunately, a term I picked up from a great essay I read a while ago, titled "Pity the Sub-genius". Why pity? I don't remember the arguments in the essay, but I could concoct a few of my own. Bear with me.

    Did you ever see Milos Forman's epoch-making movie, Amadeus? One of my favorite movies! (By the way, Mozart was probably also an Aspie -- there seems to be no end to this....) Anyway, the main character in the movie, Salieri, a somewhat talented composer in his own right, shudders in awe of Mozart's genius: with enough intelligence to recognize genius itself, enough depth of soul to be utterly moved by such sublime compositions, Salieri unfortunately lacks the genius himself to compose anything approaching the truly divine -- which was what Mozart's pieces were to him. Therefore, he complains to God, bitterly:

    Antonio Salieri: All I wanted was to sing to God. He gave me that longing... and then made me mute. Why? Tell me that. If He didn't want me to praise Him with music, why implant the desire? Like a lust in my body! And then deny me the talent?
     
    Yes, I hear you Salieri! Like him, I am also a sub-genius, perhaps even a sub-sub-genius. May the Lord have pity on us. But we do have a consolation prize: we have a bit more than average intelligence, so we can at least recognize genius when we see it. We can feel gripped by true genius and shaken to our core. We can revel in its awesomeness and even try to get near it. And this is what I'm doing here on this site: I recognize Unz's genius and want to partake in the boundless knowledge he so generously distributes among his readers. But I know my place in the pecking order: I can't sing to God, but I can certainly listen to and appreciate the songs of angels. At least that's what some of his articles and those of some other writers here sound like to me.

    So that was just a long-winded introduction to your comment, which starts off with a compliment -- for which I thank you. I do ramble on. Already I'm getting complaints from at least one fellow commenter that I repeat myself too much. Sorry for that. Anyway, the Aspie Experience. I'm glad you appreciated my last comment which was a deep dive for me. What I was trying to do was make some connections: between Striker's article and Sombart's book and some of the comments here. But to answer your direct question: yes, I do think Asperger's is mostly genetics. It runs in families. Many adults only find out they have Asperger's after they take their own kids to the doctor: their own child's diagnosis leads them to figure out that they, too, have the condition.

    As for the Aspie gene "enabling" genius-like qualities, that seems like a fair guess -- the "neurodivergence", as it is called, leads Aspies to think differently than most people and this difference pushes them towards innovative solutions to problems or creative works of literature and art. Obviously, only a tiny fraction of Aspies ever reach "genius" status, but at the upper stratosphere of true genius there is an impressive number of them.

    But what I think is the kicker in Aspieness is the hyperfocus: Aspies have one-track minds and when they latch onto some "special interest" they literally cannot let go. Their favorite game when young is often playing with toy trains -- and sometimes they stay on the same goddamned railroad track their whole lives. When you combine hyperfocus with genius what you get is a massively brained individual hard-wired by his neurodiversity to solve seemingly insurmountable scientific problems or to create a work of art of incalculable worth and beauty -- even if it takes decades. You see that over and over again. E. O. Wilson, for example, studied ants for over fifty years. Fifty years studying ants. Just imagine. Ants. And with that he basically inaugurated the discipline of sociobiology.

    But, getting back to the topic of Striker's Sombartian article, what I'm mostly interested in right now is this: Jew-obsessed Aspies. In other words, who were the Aspie Geniuses who hyperfocused on Jews? I can think of three off the top of my head: Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, and Bobby Fischer (who was Jewish himself). Amazing individuals, amazing life histories, amazing Aspies -- and all Jew-obsessed. What if we had a whole army of Aspie Geniuses hyperfocusing on Jews? Hell, you could get a lot done with them! How do you think Silicon Valley was created? By Aspies. Aspie William Shockley, who practically named the Valley itself and kicked off the electronic age by inventing the transistor, was unfortunately not Jew-obsessed; rather, his hyperfocus was on Race and IQ, and he is still "black"-listed on the SPLC site, if you know what I mean.

    This Army-of-Aspies strategy has been used in other occasions, besides building Silicon Valley. Almost all the scientists who built the atom bomb were Aspies: Oppenheimer, von Neumann, Feynman -- all Aspies, all Jews. Elon Musk is an Aspie himself and uses the same strategy: he gathers a "small group of motivated individuals" to complete his projects -- but what he really means is that he depends on Aspies to get them done. What's interesting about Aspie Musk is that I think he is secretely Jew-obsessed. He has repeated many times: "I am obsessed with the truth". And I've seen some hints of this and he's taken some hits from the Jews -- described in the incredible essay Unz produced about Musk's "going to Canossa" episode a few months back.

    What I wonder about is this: the Jews cancelled Hans Asperger himself, accused him of being a Nazi, and got the formal condition named after him, Asperger's Syndrome, removed from the DSM-V in 2013. These days, you're not even supposed to say you have "Asperger's -- it's verboten. Why? What's the real reason they did this? I suspect it was because Jews know what formidable opponents Aspies can be, that is, if Aspies decide to hyperfocus on the Jews themselves. If and when an Army of Aspies is mobilized and becomes hyperfocused on Jews -- on the Truth -- then, Rabbit, we might have more than a snowball's chance in hell to bring down the world-ruling satanic Jewish Power Structure.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @JPS

    —-Thanks again for your tasty comment which only seems to confirm what I already said.
    It opened me up to a better understanding of myself.It seems that maybe I am partly an ‘Aspi’ myself but in a lower and much lower league. As you say there are many levels.

    It seems that if you’re going to create something new you have to be an Aspi, to have this ‘neurodivergence’ which leads your brain. It is more genetic than cultural of nature which means that you either have it or not.
    You can’t do anything to have it, to improve on it or to remove it. It functions automatically like the whole genetic apparatus.

    I have seen that film/Amadeus and I very well understand Salieri’s pain. It is the fate of the mediocrity, those of us who are less talented and which pain I must share too.
    But as you beautifully write
    “we do have a consolation prize: we have a bit more than average intelligence, so we can at least recognize genius when we see it. We can feel gripped by true genius and shaken to our core. We can revel in its awesomeness and even try to get near it. And this is what I’m doing here on this site: I recognize Unz’s genius and want to partake in the boundless knowledge he so generously distributes among his readers. But I know my place in the pecking order: I can’t sing to God, but I can certainly listen to and appreciate the songs of angels. At least that’s what some of his articles and those of some other writers here sound like to me.”

    Nice of you to write about this ‘Aspi’ too. I appreciate your information and enjoy reading you. And that ending of your comment is great: an ‘army of Aspi’ that could build a better world.
    Thanks.

    • Replies: @Odd Rabbit
    @Odd Rabbit

    Addendum to previous comment

    You write in your previous comment: "Below the more tab I put up some links to Michael Fitzgerald’s work on diagnosing famous deceased individuals with Asperger’s Syndrome:"

    I don't see the name of Adolf Hitler among the names there. After reading the article The Enigma of Hitler by Leon Degrelle on IHR-web site
    I started to suspect that he could have been an 'Aspi' too.
    From this article of Leon Degrelle you get a quite different picture of him than what you get from the films of H-wood and the official history and the articles of the main stream media.
    https://ihr.org/journal/v14n3p22_Degrelle.html
    What is your opinion?
    P.s. Ron Unz has written many articles about the ww2 and has proved that the official story is not true but mainly wrong. I suppose you have read these articles.
    Could the same be true with the person of Hitler?
    American Pravda: Understanding World War II • 2h31m ▶
    The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
    RON UNZ • SEPTEMBER 23, 2019
    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

  • @Fin of a cobra
    @Davy Crockit

    Wow! Thank you for your kind words. I felt the same way when I read your comment. I especially like your expression, the "Unz Experience". There -- I've capitalized it and now it's a thing. I'm sure many commenters feel the same: we come here not only for the marvelous articles such as the one above by Eric Striker but also to interact with each other in the comments section. And what pearls do we find sometimes! We start feeling a connection with each other as in a community of like-minded individuals. That's priceless. Because, truth be told, out here in the wilderness it feels like we're preaching in the desert -- even with loved ones! -- who just don't "get it". Here at TUR, we're sure to find others who "get it" and it's such a relief!

    As for my own Unz Experience, as you so aptly put it, I love diving deep into texts such as the article above. To me, the article itself is like a partially painted canvas to which we can add our own touches in the comments section. It's curious to see what the commenters do with this opportunity. Some come barreling down with a bucket of paint and want to smear the whole damn thing. Others add a few details missing in the original. Sometimes, we have the privilege of having Unz Himself come down from his Olympus into the valley of sorrows and adding his own colors -- with a Jovian artist's vigorous brushstrokes. It's thrilling to behold.

    I had already read some Sombart before but never paid the attention his work so much deserves. Striker's article and especially your comments above made me go back and give it a deeper reading, for which I am truly grateful. You're right: a whole industry of research could be built around Sombart's work, just the one on the Jews alone. What I was amazed at was the perspicuity of your comment on the "Asperger's Jew": you zeroed in on a rather peripheral anecdote in the text and made me see that there might be something there worth investigating. You suddenly opened up for me "the doors of perception", as Huxley would put it.

    I mention Huxley because that's exactly what I have been studying: famous writers, scientists and thinkers in general who were Aspies. There is an incredible number of them, including Huxley, identified by Michael Fitzgerald, an Irish psychiatrist who has diagnosed over 5,000 individuals with Asperger's Syndrome over the course or more than 40 years of clinical work. Besides all these diagnosis of living people, Fitzgerald went back to the biographies of famous deceased individuals and diagnosed them posthumously as well. The number of important Aspies is staggering. But it's not only the quantity that's impressive: it's also the quality. After studying Fitzgerald's books and articles for the past couple of months, I have come to realize what he is really trying to point at through his works (though I haven't found a direct quote which reflects this yet): great part of our "modern" worldview -- the foundation of the "reality" in which we live -- was created by Aspies. I'll put up some links at the end of my comment to reference Fitzgerald's work, but all the people mentioned below were specifically diagnosed by him as Aspies.

    Just a few examples to get us going, but it's such a deep rabbit hole that few will dare to even approach the entrance. There are certain well-known names, such as Newton, a classic Aspie, who gave us a new vision of how the universe really works. Newton's work was refined by Einstein, who was also an Aspie (and who was best friends with another Aspie, Kurt Godel, who gave us the incompleteness theories). Between those two there are several important, worldview-defining giants who make up this Aspie constellation: Carolus Linneaus, taxonomy; Gregor Mendel, foundations of genetics; Darwin, evolutionary theory; Dimitri Mendeleev, the periodic table; Ivan Pavlov, conditioned response; both Freud and Jung (!), the unconscious and the collective unconscious.

    These are just a few of the scientists and I haven't even touched upon the writers yet, such as Yeats, Joyce, and Lewis Carroll of rabbit-hole fame; and not to mention the philosophers, like Kant and Wittgenstein (and also Schopenhauer, though Schopy -- my favorite philosopher -- is the only exception on this list, since it is my own diagnosis and not Fitzgerald's).

    OK, so all this is just off the top of my head from stuff I remember from what I read. I can't imagine how long this comment would get if I went deep down and did some real research. But now let's hook back to your comment and Striker's article on Sombart. What impressed me the most in Sombart's chapter on Jewish Characteristics is the fact that he made so many bold and sweeping statements about the Jews as a people. Writers don't do that anymore. Sure, he commits the heresy of massive generalizations, but these are extremely helpful. What Sombart has done is to characterize a people -- the Jews -- with such incredible and precise details, as if they were a single individual, which then opens the door for us to "diagnose" that "individual", that is, the Jews themselves as a people. I have a mind to contact Fitzgerald himself and ask him to read Sombart's chef d'oeuvre and have him do a formal "diagnosis" of the Jews as Aspies.

    The link between the Jews-as-Aspies and all the Genius Aspies mentioned above is this: together, BOTH groups have formed our worldview to an unimaginable extent (remembering that some individuals overlap in the Venn diagram). Unz likes to say that "the media creates our reality", but we must underline the fact that Jews control the media, and thus what he is really saying is this: "the Jews control our reality". We know this here on TUR and it can even be left unsaid. This could be called "The Jewish Angle" through which reality is created. But maybe this analysis could be a bit more nuanced were we to complemente it with what we can call "The Aspie Angle": those Aspie Geniuses have also contributed to shape and create our reality. When we put the two angles together, we may get a clearer picture of how our reality was created.

    Anyway, thanks again for such a stimulating comment, Davy Cricket. By the way, great handle! I imagine Jiminy Cricket -- the "conscience" -- wearing David Crockett's coonskin cap -- the "courage". That's exactly what we need to confront the incredible challenges and dangers of our times: a guiding conscience while we search for truth and unbridled courage in the face of unfathomable evil.

    Below the more tab I put up some links to Michael Fitzgerald's work on diagnosing famous deceased individuals with Asperger's Syndrome:First Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Ireland. Simon Baron-Cohen described my book ‘Autism and Creativity’ as “is the best book on autism”. I have diagnosed over 5,000 persons with Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome He was awarded the Top Excellence in Psychiatry Award, Hospital Professionals Awards. Prof. F. Wood president of the Irish Medical Council was one of the judges. Then retired to spend more time in Brussels.
    https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Fitzgerald-6

    The Genesis of Artistic Creativity: Asperger's Syndrome and the Arts, May 18, 2005, by Michael Fitzgerald (Author)
    The Genesis of Artistic Creativity is a revealing exploration of the lives of 21 famous writers, philosophers, musicians and painters including George Orwell, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Andy Warhol and many others, in light of the recognized criteria for diagnosis of high-functioning autism and Asperger's Syndrome (AS). ... From Herman Melville's eccentric breakfast habits and Simone Weil's intense dislike of being touched by other people to Ludwig van Beethoven's inappropriate marriage proposals and Vincent van Gogh's inability to form satisfying relationships with others, the author offers compelling insights into the association between creativity and autism spectrum disorders.
    https://www.amazon.com/Genesis-Artistic-Creativity-Aspergers-Syndrome/dp/1843103346

    At researchgate.net, here are a few of the names of files that I've downloaded -- just to get a sense of Fitzgerald's work:

    WilliamShockleyFounderofTheelectronicagewasontheautismspectrum1.docx
    WilliamShakespearewasontheAutismSpectrumAspergersSyndrome.docx
    WasGandhiontheautismspectrum.docx
    GrahamGreenenovelistwasontheautismspectrum.docx
    Kafkaautismautisticcourtshipandautisticnarrative.docx
    WasMurrayGell-Mannontheautismspectrum.docx
    OliverSackswasontheautismspectrum.docx
    J.EdgarHooverwasontheautismspectrum.docx
    EdwardLearwasontheautismspectrum.docx
    DidscientistswithautismmakethelikelihoodofthedevelopmentoftheatomicbombatLosAlamosmorelikely.docx
    JohnvonNeumannwasontheautismspectrum.docx
    ThomasHardywasontheautismspectrum.docx
    PatrickKavanaghpoetwasontheautismspectrum.docx
    WasAlexanderSolzhenitsynontheautismspectrum.docx
    RichardFeynmanwasontheautisticspectrum.docx
    KenDoddonthespectrum-Comediansonthespectrum.docx
    StephenHawkingALSandASD.docx
    SalvadorDali.docx
    TheWrightBrothers-Aviationandanautisticfamily.docx
    DerekParfitphilosopherwasontheautismspectrum.docx
    PaulCezannewasontheautismspectrum.docx
    WasAnthonyBurgessontheautismspectrum.docx
    LordHaw-HawWilliamJoycewasontheautismspectrum1.docx
    AutismnarcissismIcarusandRobertOppenheimer.docx
    EnricoFermiMaster.docx
    DaphneDuMaurierwasanenigmaticwriter.docx
    W.ErnestFreudwasontheautismspectrumfinal.docx
    AnthonyBluntartcriticandspywasontheautismspectrum.docx
    WasDmitriMendeleevontheautisticspectrum.docx
    Flaubertwasonthespectrum.docx
    DorisLessingwasonthespectrum.docx
    EdwardHeathwasontheautismspectrum.docx
    DidCountHenryRussell-TheManwhoMarriedaMountainhaveautism.docx
    C.S.Lewissecretmanontheautismspectrum.docx
    RobertGoddardrocketmanandautism.docx
    TerryPratchettwasonthespectrum.docx
    LordFrankLongfordwasonthespectrum.docx
    Disraelinarcissisticpersonalitydisorder1.docx
    GeneralFranco.docx
    IvanPavlovwasontheautismspectrum.docx
    EdithSitwellhadMarfanssyndrome.docx
    GeneralGeorgePattonFinal.docx
    GeorgeBernardShawwasanartisticeccentricpersonalityonthespectrum.docx
    AnthonyTrollopeAnartisticpersonalityonthespectrum.docx
    A.L.Rowsehadanarcissisticpersonalityandfeaturesofthespectrum.docx
    WasSatyajitRayfilmmakerontheautismspectrumor.docx
    JamesStewartactorwasontheautismspectrum.docx
    PrimoLevi.docx
    WoodrowWilsonfinal.docx
    AutismSimonPhillipsNortonandJohnNash.docx
    FictionalizedFreud-PsychoanalysisandFiction.docx
    Robespierre.docx
    RichardNixonpoliticianwithautismspectrumdisorder.docx
    WaltWhitmanhadautismspectrumdisorder.docx
    CarlJunghadautismspectrumdisorder.docx

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @24th Alabama, @A B Coreopsis

    Thanks for this ‘Aspie-ezperience’.
    Your ability/skill to write seems to be enormous. I would say ‘Aspie-level’.
    You are in good and famous company.
    Very interesting this knowledge about Asperger-syndrome you describe. It’s all genetic, isn’t it? They have ‘Asperger-genes’ which enable this all for them.
    Do you agree?

    • Replies: @Fin of a cobra
    @Odd Rabbit


    Thanks for this ‘Aspie-ezperience’. Your ability/skill to write seems to be enormous. I would say ‘Aspie-level’. You are in good and famous company.
     
    Gee whiz, Rabbit, thanks for that... I think. OK, I guess I'll take "Aspie-level writing" as a compliment. But though flattering, I flat out reject your insinuation of me being in the "company" of those Aspie Geniuses I mentioned. Oh, how I wish it were so! But no -- no such luck. I'm merely a "sub-genius", unfortunately, a term I picked up from a great essay I read a while ago, titled "Pity the Sub-genius". Why pity? I don't remember the arguments in the essay, but I could concoct a few of my own. Bear with me.

    Did you ever see Milos Forman's epoch-making movie, Amadeus? One of my favorite movies! (By the way, Mozart was probably also an Aspie -- there seems to be no end to this....) Anyway, the main character in the movie, Salieri, a somewhat talented composer in his own right, shudders in awe of Mozart's genius: with enough intelligence to recognize genius itself, enough depth of soul to be utterly moved by such sublime compositions, Salieri unfortunately lacks the genius himself to compose anything approaching the truly divine -- which was what Mozart's pieces were to him. Therefore, he complains to God, bitterly:

    Antonio Salieri: All I wanted was to sing to God. He gave me that longing... and then made me mute. Why? Tell me that. If He didn't want me to praise Him with music, why implant the desire? Like a lust in my body! And then deny me the talent?
     
    Yes, I hear you Salieri! Like him, I am also a sub-genius, perhaps even a sub-sub-genius. May the Lord have pity on us. But we do have a consolation prize: we have a bit more than average intelligence, so we can at least recognize genius when we see it. We can feel gripped by true genius and shaken to our core. We can revel in its awesomeness and even try to get near it. And this is what I'm doing here on this site: I recognize Unz's genius and want to partake in the boundless knowledge he so generously distributes among his readers. But I know my place in the pecking order: I can't sing to God, but I can certainly listen to and appreciate the songs of angels. At least that's what some of his articles and those of some other writers here sound like to me.

    So that was just a long-winded introduction to your comment, which starts off with a compliment -- for which I thank you. I do ramble on. Already I'm getting complaints from at least one fellow commenter that I repeat myself too much. Sorry for that. Anyway, the Aspie Experience. I'm glad you appreciated my last comment which was a deep dive for me. What I was trying to do was make some connections: between Striker's article and Sombart's book and some of the comments here. But to answer your direct question: yes, I do think Asperger's is mostly genetics. It runs in families. Many adults only find out they have Asperger's after they take their own kids to the doctor: their own child's diagnosis leads them to figure out that they, too, have the condition.

    As for the Aspie gene "enabling" genius-like qualities, that seems like a fair guess -- the "neurodivergence", as it is called, leads Aspies to think differently than most people and this difference pushes them towards innovative solutions to problems or creative works of literature and art. Obviously, only a tiny fraction of Aspies ever reach "genius" status, but at the upper stratosphere of true genius there is an impressive number of them.

    But what I think is the kicker in Aspieness is the hyperfocus: Aspies have one-track minds and when they latch onto some "special interest" they literally cannot let go. Their favorite game when young is often playing with toy trains -- and sometimes they stay on the same goddamned railroad track their whole lives. When you combine hyperfocus with genius what you get is a massively brained individual hard-wired by his neurodiversity to solve seemingly insurmountable scientific problems or to create a work of art of incalculable worth and beauty -- even if it takes decades. You see that over and over again. E. O. Wilson, for example, studied ants for over fifty years. Fifty years studying ants. Just imagine. Ants. And with that he basically inaugurated the discipline of sociobiology.

    But, getting back to the topic of Striker's Sombartian article, what I'm mostly interested in right now is this: Jew-obsessed Aspies. In other words, who were the Aspie Geniuses who hyperfocused on Jews? I can think of three off the top of my head: Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, and Bobby Fischer (who was Jewish himself). Amazing individuals, amazing life histories, amazing Aspies -- and all Jew-obsessed. What if we had a whole army of Aspie Geniuses hyperfocusing on Jews? Hell, you could get a lot done with them! How do you think Silicon Valley was created? By Aspies. Aspie William Shockley, who practically named the Valley itself and kicked off the electronic age by inventing the transistor, was unfortunately not Jew-obsessed; rather, his hyperfocus was on Race and IQ, and he is still "black"-listed on the SPLC site, if you know what I mean.

    This Army-of-Aspies strategy has been used in other occasions, besides building Silicon Valley. Almost all the scientists who built the atom bomb were Aspies: Oppenheimer, von Neumann, Feynman -- all Aspies, all Jews. Elon Musk is an Aspie himself and uses the same strategy: he gathers a "small group of motivated individuals" to complete his projects -- but what he really means is that he depends on Aspies to get them done. What's interesting about Aspie Musk is that I think he is secretely Jew-obsessed. He has repeated many times: "I am obsessed with the truth". And I've seen some hints of this and he's taken some hits from the Jews -- described in the incredible essay Unz produced about Musk's "going to Canossa" episode a few months back.

    What I wonder about is this: the Jews cancelled Hans Asperger himself, accused him of being a Nazi, and got the formal condition named after him, Asperger's Syndrome, removed from the DSM-V in 2013. These days, you're not even supposed to say you have "Asperger's -- it's verboten. Why? What's the real reason they did this? I suspect it was because Jews know what formidable opponents Aspies can be, that is, if Aspies decide to hyperfocus on the Jews themselves. If and when an Army of Aspies is mobilized and becomes hyperfocused on Jews -- on the Truth -- then, Rabbit, we might have more than a snowball's chance in hell to bring down the world-ruling satanic Jewish Power Structure.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @JPS

  • The ongoing Israel/Gaza conflict just passed the six month mark, an astonishing development that almost no one would have imagined at the time it first began. The length of the fighting is without precedent across the last seventy-five years of Israeli military history. In 1956, Israel allied itself with Britain and France and suddenly attacked...
  • @Fin of a cobra
    Another masterful article by Unz -- we've come to expect that, Monday mornings. Here at TUR, we're all bulldogs for truth and now we have another huge juicy bone to gnaw on! Where does one even begin to chew? Well, I sort of enter a trance when I read Unz's articles and let my brain wander and latch onto whatever associations it fancies. For some reason, this association apparatus in my head came up with that famous scene in "A Few Good Men", in which Jack Nicholson admits to having ordered "code red" on a marine as extreme punishment -- which wound up killing him.

    Now that I think about it, I guess the link I made subconsciously was that these assassinations perpetrated by Mossad painstakingly detailed by Unz in the above article must all have had some kind of decision-making body or person -- like Nicholson in the movie -- ordering these killings. I'm sure many of you will remember the scene in the courtroom in which a young Tom Cruise grills Nicholson about the murder of the marine.

    But then I imagine another type of "courtroom", a present-day Sanhedrin, where today's High Priest convenes the other 70 members in the Beit Din and orders the assassination of world leaders such as JFK and other individuals deemed a nuisance to The Cause of the Chosen. In this case, the order would be “קוד אדום” (Kod Adom) -- “Code Red” in Hebrew. Stay with me, people! We're still at the entrance of this extended rabbit hole and it could not be otherwise when dealing with the Talmudic Mind (TM).

    Who am I talking about? Well, the top-of-the-pyramid Jews in general, but especially the guy who wrote the damn play, "A Few Good Men", which was turned into a movie: Aaron Benjamin Sorkin. With a name like that, you gotta be imbibed with Jewish law and lore up to your gills from a young age: remember, Aaron, Moses's brother, was the first High Priest (Kohen Gadol).

    You think stuff like that doesn't influence a young impressionable Jewish Hyper Mind like Aaron's? You fellow Unz readers think you yourself live in a goddamn second reality created by the Jews? Imagine the Jew himself! It's gotta be a heavy burden -- that little yarmulke has the weight of 6000 years of Jewish history! So what do you do with this to get the load off your head? You write plays and screenplays!

    I will put the transcript of the whole clip below the more tab so as not to clutter this thread, for those who don't remember the scene. But let's read some morsels of Aaron's production, shall we, and if we read between the lines we will see that he was explaining -- through Hoffman's "revelation of the method" -- how and why Jews assassinate the undesirables, the deplorables, the enemies of the Jewish people (who might be a Jew himself!).


    [Jessup-Nicholson] You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You?! You, Lt. Weinberg?! I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom! ... You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: That Santiago's death - while tragic -- probably saved lives! And my existence - while grotesque and incomprehensible to you - saves lives! You don't want the truth....We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something.
     
    Powerful stuff! Back to the rabbit hole. Let's make some associations between the transcript of the movie to the article above: Unz is Cruise accusing Nicholson of ordering "code red" -- that is, the Mossad assassinations. I can almost hear Unz screaming in the article and asking the head Jews: "did you order code red?!" The response is right there at the end of the clip: of course the Jews ordered the goddamned assassinations.

    What is even more interesting is that, in the original screenplay, Aaron Sorkin didn't write the famous "You can't handle the truth" line, but rather "you already know the truth". Nicholson explained why he changed that line in the script: "Nicholson felt the character's hubris would be better communicated by revealing that he believes himself so intellectually superior to everyone else that no one but him could comprehend the reasoning behind his actions...".

    So Sorkin is telling Unz and all of us outright that, deep down, we already know the awful truth. But Sorkin reveals much more than that: he also tells us WHY these assassinations of the undesireables by Jews must take place and why they will continue to take place: because it "saves lives", which to him means Jewish lives; because the "walls have to guarded", which to him means "the Wailing Wall"; because "they" know a deep dark Jewish secret that we have "the luxury of not knowing"; and because "of a life spent defending something", which means defending The Cause of the Chosen People.

    Well, at least that's my take on why Jews have no qualms in perpetrating assassinations galore all throughout history and why they will continue to do so. And it was all very neatly explained to us by "A Few Good Men".... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FnO3igOkOk&t=56s


    [Kaffee-Cruise] Now I'm asking you! COLONEL JESSUP! DID YOU ORDER THE CODE RED?! ...

    [Jessup-Nicholson] I'll answer the question. You want answers?! ...

    [Kaffee-Cruise] I WANT THE TRUTH!

    [Jessup-Nicholson] You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You?! You, Lt. Weinberg?! I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom! You weep for Santiago and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: That Santiago's death - while tragic - probably saved lives! And my existence - while grotesque and incomprehensible to you - saves lives! You don't want the truth, because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties... You want me on that wall. You need me on that wall. We use words like "honor", "code", "loyalty". We use this words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline! I have neither the time, nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it! I would rather you just said "thank you", and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think you are entitled to!

    [Kaffee-Cruise] ... DID YOU ORDER THE CODE RED?!

    [Jessup-Nicholson] YOU'RE GODDAMN RIGHT I DID!!
     

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Thanks. You write:
    “But Sorkin reveals much more than that: he also tells us WHY these assassinations of the undesireables by Jews must take place and why they will continue to take place: because it “saves lives”, which to him means Jewish lives;”

    I have no doubt about that.
    Sorkin really tells more than what we already know…tells what is the motive behind these assassinations by Jews.—I would say: these talmudic Jews/Jewish mafia,
    …as opposed to many of those Jews who don’t accept and support this talmudic strategy of biblical war and what the zionists do in Palestine.
    This talmudic mafia/and its bankers who control the money/ is the real problem and it also exploits, as Henry Makow writes on his web-site, the jewish people in their own projects and they must live under the yoke of zionist rabbi-elite/are somehow ‘assassinated’/made subservient to mafia
    and must live in subjugation and sacrifice their life to zionist elite.

    • Replies: @Justrambling
    @Odd Rabbit

    Genetically, the Palestinians and Jews appear much closer than politically, culturally or religiously. The question remains if the descendants of ancient Palestinians who did not abandon Judaism in favor of Islam or Christianity would in fact count as modern day Jewish Israelis.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11543891/

  • @IronForge
    Another Christian Zionist Article?

    Jesus never existed.

    Goto Jesusneverexisted.com

    The Cult was fabricated from Non-Jewish Judaism Fans trying to Hijack the Jewish Religion+Figures by amalgamating a "Messiah" from the Solstice/Spring Seasonal Cults figures of Dionysus, Mythras, and others - for the Benefit of Sponsor Constantine at Nicea in the 4thCE.

    The Gospels nor the completed New Testament never appeared until they did as part of the first Christian Bibles - commissioned by Constantine.

    All the Horse Manure about Source Documents of the Gospels led up to the final Hoax claimed by the Dead Sea Scroll Christo-Catholic Fraudsters - until Reverse Compilation of released texts forced a complete Public Display of the Scrolls in the 1990s - never containing the Gospels.

    Took the lazy Christian Fact Deniers a few decades of suppression; but Bona Fide Scholars and Skeptics put the trail of Documents together...

    BTW, 01AD/"01CE" was established by a Christian Monk in the 6thCentury CE.

    Dark Ages where Christian Dogmatic suppression reversed Scientific Progress (Roman Cement, Medical Tech including Cataract Removal Gear) for about a Millennia.

    ******

    Israel is a Masonic-Zionist State - leaning heavily towards the Zionist-Jewish persuasion. Christian Occupation happened during the Crusades - hundreds of years ago.

    Do we really need to listen to a Clergyman whose Cult Religion was responsible for suppressing Europe, Colonizing most of the World at one point, and currently known for "Absolutions and Penance" that prevent the Prosecution of Clergy+Member Child Molesters even to this Day - which probably make them the Host of the Largest Social Network Clusters of Child Molesters?

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Charles Martel France, @amor fati, @Palmm

    “Jesus never existed.”

    In his book Report on Jesus/Jesus-Report, Johannes Lehmann explains what is the difference between historical and theological/biblical Jesus and why the historical J has been replaced by the J of theology.
    It’s a good and easy to understand book. Every christian zionist should read it to free himself from the zionist and biblical Yahweh-yoke. There is better way to heaven than Bible/Yahweh.

    Original German text: Jesus Report, Protokoll einer Verfälschung
    @1970 by Econ Verlag GmbH, Düsseldorf und Wien

  • The academic world has been buzzing with arguments seeking to explain the origins and mechanism of Jewish power in the modern West. The question is rife with landmines and one side of the debate is heavily stifled. One theory gaining traction, promoted by figures such as Richard Hanania and Cambridge lecturer Nathan Cofnas, is that...
  • @Odd Rabbit
    @JPS

    "Our system of government was created by Secret Societies working hand-in-glove with the Jewish money power. This is the real reason they control our society."

    Agree. Wise words.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    This in addition to the previous one:

    We can compare the Jewish money to mortar.
    The Jewish money power is like the mortar/cement that masons use to hold ‘bricks’ together. If you remove the mortar the wall collapses.

  • @JPS
    It's remarkable how reticent contemporary antisemites are to speak about the ORGANIZATION of the Jews, the COVERT organization, that rational inference surely tells us must be the KEY to understanding this great MYSTERY.

    In times long past, the Jews were spoken of as being in perpetual servitude, being in exile. And this was because all the gentiles knew who they were and to what community, tribe, nation and race they themselves belonged. There was none of this nonsense of atomistic individuals operating in some sort of free and open society in which it is a kind of disqualification to speak of one's national and religious identity. And the Jews were recognized for what they were. Malevolent aliens.

    Edmund Burke, without giving us any details other than a footnote regarding the papers of the Bavarian Illuminati, tells us that nations were wading into oceans of debt, and the injured creditors are named as being the force behind the conspiratorial power in Europe.

    This sort of talk is already "off the reservation" - because it gets to the heart of the matter. Our system of government was created by Secret Societies working hand-in-glove with the Jewish money power. This is the real reason they control our society. And even if an Andrew Jackson might attempt close down the National Bank. Or if a Freemason like Henry Ford would publicize the Protocols to a broad audience, these actions were never capable of actually dealing with the problem. Henry Ford ended up building the factories that enabled the Soviet Union to produce the munitions for victory. Andrew Jackson set up the Democratic Party which has been the party of the Jews for over a century now.

    The notion that we are free and independent citizens with nothing binding us other than rights of a "limited government" (yeah right!) has made all organization against the Jewish power impossible. They have the means to buy everything, to silence their critics, and to control public discourse. They were able to achieve this through the institution of Freemasonry overthrowing the temporal and spiritual powers of the gentiles. The overthrow of throne and altar. With the idolization of characters like Thomas Jefferson being served by his mulatto slave sons and being famed for declaring the equality of all men.

    The Jewish power isn't a product of the 1960s, or even of the outcome of WW2 or of alleged gentile "guilt" over the "Six Million." All of our institutions are set up to act in deference to Jews and TO THEIR SECRET CRIMINAL CONSPIRATORIAL ORGANIZATION, THAT EVEN ANTISEMITES PRETEND IS FANTASY.

    Reading these people is like watching the Godfather (nod to priss) and saying "Oh, those Corleones won out because they have higher IQ scores than the average gangster." "The Corleones valued family more than the other gangsters" - "Michael was well-educated because of parental investment." "The Corleones were successful because of their aggressive nepotism, ie, the mutual benefits provided by the Padrone and his Godchildren!"
    "Sicilians knew to stick together."

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    “Our system of government was created by Secret Societies working hand-in-glove with the Jewish money power. This is the real reason they control our society.”

    Agree. Wise words.

    • Replies: @Odd Rabbit
    @Odd Rabbit

    This in addition to the previous one:

    We can compare the Jewish money to mortar.
    The Jewish money power is like the mortar/cement that masons use to hold 'bricks' together. If you remove the mortar the wall collapses.

  • @24th Alabama
    @Loup-Bouc

    Assuming that you were trained as a physician, you have been grossly negligent in keeping current with medical genetics. According to Jnetics, "Anybody of Jewish ancestry has a one in three chance of carrying one or more of the 47 severe recessive genetic disorders..." Unfortunately, I was unable to determine the number of individuals who manifest symptoms or their percentage of the Jewish population.

    Among the most familiar are Tay-Sachs Disease, Goucher Disease and Cystic Fibrosis. Many of the 47 diseases are diagnosed in infancy or early childhood and cause serious metabolic, neurological or musculoskeletal dysfunction. This would prevent normal school attendance and virtually all meaningful IQ testing. If they could be tested, their IQ level would likely be rather low, with some expected exceptions.

    Of course, you can block my comments but you cannot
    dissuade me from writing them.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Loup-Bouc

    Thanks.
    Good comment. ….Of course the genes are the most important thing in all human life because everything is primarily genetic.
    So we must give more value to genes and be careful with genes because they tend to replicate and spread automatically their own patterns of behavior.
    That is the great challenge … if we want a better world we must control the genes …there should be no tolerance in the future for destructive and bad/”perverse”/psychopathic ’dinosaur-genes’,
    …when they are a burden to humanity it can no more tolerate them and must prevent their spread/replication and try to destroy them for a better future/or to survive …or be destroyed by them when the ’gene parlament’ takes control over the rational ’brain parlament’.
    http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/THOC/enigma_code.pdf

    • Agree: 24th Alabama
    • Replies: @Awakening Observer
    @Odd Rabbit

    Odd sorta explication of a rationalistic/materialistic genetic imperative. When we contemplate the caduceus we observe the TWIN servants coiling around the pole. One serpent is genetic, the DNA half of the individual. Ever since the inanity of Rene des Cartes; scientistic materialism has been dominant in academicist circles in the Collective Waste, particularly here in the Ruptured Republic.

    Second Twin in the composition is NOT an emanation of DNA, rather that component is purely spiritual and Cosmic in its purport. A line by Bob Dylan eventually sank into deeper levels of my consciousness. As a master channeler from the Akashic Records...Universal Soul, according to Carl Jung...Dylan's line of "your spirit and your soul" ultimately engendered an awakening for me.

    Yes, as Teilhard de Chardin noted: Paraphrasing slightly here: We are spirits "enduring" a material lifetime. The DNA component is the Soul. Afro-Americans appear to have an instinctive grasp of that reality. Spirit is an emanation of the One.

    All are One and One is All, while the Whole is equal to yet greater than the sum of its parts.

    Contemplate that brief sentence. It explains much.

    Replies: @24th Alabama

  • @Hulkamania
    @GoySoy

    I think they are also very driven. You can say they want it more. Their drive comes from an inborn anxiety that arises in situations where they lack control. You can see this in their behavior. They lose their minds when they do not have full control over something. This anxiety gives them a strong desire for worldly power and control.

    Replies: @Bedford, @Alexander Selkirk, @Brás Cubas

    Gilad Atzmon’s PRE-Traumatic Stress Syndrome is a useful concept for understanding their anxiety when they aren’t in control.

    • Agree: Odd Rabbit
  • @Fin of a cobra
    The Jewish Question is still the "world's foremost problem", as Henry Ford wrote over a hundred years ago. Any article or book that doesn't mention it is basically not dealing with reality. The author of this article attacked the JQ head on, and for this he must be commended.

    Let's assume Striker debunked the theory of high IQ as a basis for Jewish Power ("JP" -- which reminds me of Jordan Peterson, that shabbos goy), in favor of Sombart's theory of a financial power grab coupled with extreme Jewish international networking and conniving capacity. Striker also pointed out the Jews' tendency to engage in crypsis, showing how the Jews were able to hide their complete domination of the Amsterdam stock exchange as far back as the 1600s. Financial control, therefore, as a mechanism of JP, is a necessary but not sufficient variable to fully explain JP: the mechanism of financial control must be coupled with the mechanism of crypsis. Thus, an integral part of JP is the Jews' ability to hide JP.

    OK, we can buy all that -- it's a good thesis, if a bit worn. But... isn't there something missing here? Is JP the only problem? Yet another variable must be added to the equation, because the real problem is what the Jews do with their JP. What do they do with it? What is their end goal? It seems pretty clear, from all we have witnessed throughout history, that they wield their JP with one overarching satanic goal in mind: the destruction and/or subjugation of all goys, especially the hated White goy. The Jews, besides being Financial Vampire Squids, instigate wars, brown invasions into White countries, race mixing, the perversion and degeneration of society, the undermining of Christianity and the family, the virus-like takeover of the goyisher kopf through media and total narrative control, all with the intent on the destruction of the goy and total world control. These are just the cruel hard facts, the upshot of JP -- and these facts comprise the very definition of Evil.

    But why? From whence cometh Jewish evil? (My evil cometh even from my Lord -- Yahweh, that psycopath.) That is the real question, and Striker's next article could be titled "On The Origins and Mechanism of Jewish Evil". There are many articles trying to explain Jewish Power, but few on Jewish Evil (notable exception goes to Guyénot): just here on TUR, there are over 80,000 results for the term "Jewish Power" and only a few dozen for "Jewish Evil".

    The real problem is not Jewish Power alone, but rather Jewish Power forever coupled in a devilish embrace with its satanic Siamese twin: Jewish Evil.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Sarah

    “The real problem is not Jewish Power alone…”

    I agree. …you got to the point.
    The real problem is the satanic/destructive quality of that power. And if it were not destructive then it would not be a problem for humanity.
    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=285453

    • LOL: Sarah
  • @anonymous
    They have a genetic superiority only when it comes to parasitism. There are no important Jewish inventions or any fruitful discoveries. Thanks to the Talmudic pseudo intellectual tradition they get intensive training in philosophic sophistry, which they use as merchants, speculators and usurers.

    From the ancient abrahamic pseudo religions to communism, neo liberalism, neo conservatism, post modernism, psychoanalysis, etc. etc. (pretty much anything "neo" and "post") - is parasitical. They take a white idea or tradition, attach themselves and make a spiritless, materialistic Jewish version of it.

    Christianity came out of "gnosticism" - a Jewish version of Greek mysticism, beginning with Philo of Alexandria. Marxism came out of Moses Hess and Marx version of the 1800s Prussian welfare state - which they turned into a genocidal messianic cult, financed and led by Jews. Milton Friedmans "free market" gospel is a Jewish version of the normal European market, where the wealth producing Europeans has been substituted by exploitative debt producing Jewish parasites. Modern art... modern science ("string theory", A.I. etc, etc.), modern "music", and on and on and on...

    As soon a European invents anything or creates anything useful you can be sure the Jews are swarming around him to take control and reap the profits. And they always succeed because they know how to turn anything into a vice - they know how to tempt and entice our lowest urges.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @SomeDude

    “–they know how to tempt and entice our lowest urges.”

    That’s very true. And it is a very good strategy that functions well.
    Now they are starting WW3 and are forcing US to attack Iran with Satanyahu.

    April 13 – Satanyahu’s Mission: Start World War 3
    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=285453

  • I remember, from when I was studying biology at the University of Illinois in the early 1980s, a genetics professor talking to our class about Jews and Palestinians. I recall him sharing his view with us that the conflict between these two groups of people—each violently fighting for their perceived religious, cultural, and biological identities—was...
  • @RoatanBill
    @Odd Rabbit

    I'm going to hazard a guess that you believe that Russia, China, the Brics in general, are somehow different from the US murderers, the Israeli murderers, the Iranian murderers, the Hezbollah murderers, the Hamas murderers, etc.

    All governments are criminal organizations that their populations simply can't identify as such due to conditioning and gov't 'education' that is actually propaganda. The religious sociopaths from centuries ago that invented the fraud of 'god' were the model upon which the highwaymen of old formed the original governments. Today, the entire planet has mafias with flags that rule every corner. These mafias only want what is best for themselves and don't give a shit about their own populations that they gladly sacrifice at gun point (draft) in some made up war for profit.

    It's identifying with your captors, Stockholm Syndrome, that is the mental condition that keeps people coalescing around their own mafia to support the slaughter of 'the other'. Russia doesn't want to terminate the WEF mania, they want to lead a variation of it that benefits them more than the current conditions. The CCP is the Chinese mafia and has built out their infrastructure to have their asian farm animals work for their ultimate benefit. Any temporary increase in the living standards of their peasants is a side effect of the ultimate purpose the CCP is after, being top dog. All governments are just mafias that want to rule over all the worlds human farm animals, nothing more.

    As long as these stupid people keep cooperating in their own ever tightening enslavement, there is no possible way of enhancing the human condition. In my entire life time, things have progressively worsened with every election, with every new phony entitlement, with every new war. It's time to stop the insanity that has proven time and time again to not be the answer for human progress.

    Anarchists did not try to carry out genocide against the Armenians in Turkey; they did not deliberately starve millions of Ukrainians; they did not create a system of death camps to kill Jews, gypsies, and Slavs in Europe; they did not fire-bomb scores of large German and Japanese cities and drop nuclear bombs on two of them; they did not carry out a 'Great Leap Forward' that killed scores of millions of Chinese; they did not attempt to kill everybody with any appreciable education in Cambodia; they did not launch one aggressive war after another; they did not implement trade sanctions that killed perhaps 500,000 Iraqi children.
    In debates between anarchists and statists, the burden of proof clearly should rest on those who place their trust in the state. Anarchy's mayhem is wholly conjectural; the state's mayhem is undeniably, factually horrendous.
    Robert Higgs

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    Ok, it seems that we have a different view of these things..
    But when you didn’t answer my question //what’s your advise to BRICS-countries to survive and win the battle against the WEF-mafia and R-sild of London who want to destroy them//, so I suppose you have no answer to it.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    @Odd Rabbit

    Russia and China are nuclear powers. South Africa and Brazil are not. India, a nuclear power, hasn't made up its mind as to where it sits. The new BRICS nations are all non nuclear.

    Nuclear nations can dispense with militaries if their entire goal is defense related, but none of them are. They must maintain their militaries if they want to conquer territory as Russia is doing in Ukraine. Taking territory without irradiating it and gathering up the other guys human farm animals, land and infrastructure requires boots on the ground.

    There is no answer for the BRICS nations because each instance is different. If, for example, Russia told that Zionist POS nation Israel that Russia would nuke their cities if they so much as flew their aircraft near Iran, Israel would think twice about any more attacks.

    No nation has friends only interests.
    Charles de Gaulle


    The Russians don't really give a shit about Syria, Iran, China, etc and the same holds true vice versa. Their oligarchy cares about what's in it for them and is why Israel keeps attacking Syria with impunity while Russia is supposed to be its defender.

    Putin is just the HMFIC of the Russian mafia, a scumbag interested in only what's good for Putin and his gang. Xi is just another mafia boss interested in what will benefit Xi and his gang. Trump, Biden, Kennedy, are also just predators interested in the control being HMFIC gives them along with all the theft that's legalized for the oligarchy.

    The little people of the world are generally too stupid to understand that they are the property, the slaves to the oligarchy known as their gov't. They spend their lives working and getting robbed by their own gov't and never seem to catch on.

    When the US falls as all hegemons eventually fall, Russia and China will be at each others throats in a short while. There will be no peace on earth as long as the ridiculous concept of gov't exists.

    Replies: @bike-anarkist

    , @Stripes Duncan
    @Odd Rabbit


    But when you didn’t answer my question //what’s your advise to BRICS-countries to survive and win the battle against the WEF-mafia and R-sild of London who want to destroy them//, so I suppose you have no answer to it.
     
    All lolbertarians will choose to simply ignore the questions for which their ideology has no answer.

    When pressed, they get frustrated and proclaim that your mind is enslaved or too small to understand their quasireligious dogma which states that government (which is a hierarchical collection of men) is the only thing that brings men into conflict. If there were no government, there would be no war, in the Neverland in which lolbertarians live.

    The lols will never accept that there will always be hierarchy among social beings, and therefore will always be government. Let Bill go on long enough and he'll start talking about killing undesirables without the least sense of irony or self-awareness. It's very droll.

    Replies: @RoatanBill, @Chris Moore

  • @Carney
    @anonymouseperson

    If America is run by Jews, why:

    - does the US still call the "settlements" in the "West Bank" illegal and why has the US constantly denounced them and pressured Israel not to expand them?

    - why did the US refuse to move its embassy to Jerusalem for 70 years plus, and refuse to recognize Israeli annexation over the Golan Heights (such as the Shebaa Farms)?

    - why does the US refuse to recognize Israeli annexation of East Jerusalem?

    - why did the US insist that Israel stop when it was sweeping all its enemies before it in 1967?

    - why did the US heavily pressure Israel not to launch a pre-emptive strike on its gathering enemies in 1973, deliberately putting Israel into mortal danger?

    - why did the US insist on selling advanced weapons like AWACS airplanes and fighter jets to Saudi Arabia in the face of intense opposition from the pro-Israel lobby?

    - why are Jews counted as white for affirmative action purposes and thus systematically discriminated against throughout the entirety of our corporate, government, media, non-profit, and academic system just as white Gentiles are? NO, don't bother citing disproportionate Jewish presence in those fields: on a purely merit-based system, Jews (along with Asians) would be even more prevalent, with the percentages of blacks, Hispanics, and other low-IQ groups collapsing.

    - why have our most elite college campuses been a hotbed of anti-Israel activism for decades, rising to such an intense pitch that Jewish students are systematically harassed, confronted, excluded, followed, berated, and threatened?

    - why is Biden even now heavily pressuring Israel not to move into Rafah, despite that being necessary to finish off Hamas?

    The only answer is that the US is not run by Jews.

    Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert, @sally, @Iksit, @anonymouseperson, @Pierre de Craon

    The only answer is that the US is not run by Jews.

    I opine, the NATO member nations, of which the USA is one, are controlled by or run by Zionist..
    Zionism is the glue that holds NATO nation members together.
    Zionism is not racial on its face, its attraction, in my view, is economic because it promotes a philosophy which encourages greedy self-interest and a philosophy that refuses to recognize that all of humanity is entitled to be equally respected, because its philosophy ignores that each human life is precious to our society, and because it does not recognize that everyone’s individual life, is entitled to the same best quality of life our global civilization can offer everyone else. The law of human rights trumps all laws, the nation states can enforce.

    Zionism refuses to acknowledge that because we who live on this earth constitute but one civilization, we must all work together to make life for everyone better..

    The “probable genocide” announced by the ICJ about the conflict in Gaza is a case on point.

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit, Newcomer
    • Replies: @Carney
    @sally

    I did not say "please post a random and totally irrelevant screed about Zionism". I asked how can the US be run by Jews since (and then I provided a long long list of US policies and actions that are hugely contrary to the interests of Jews and/or Israel, the foreign policy ones of which were all strongly opposed by Israel).

    So try again, this time instead of just non-responding with a random irrelevant rant, ACTUALLY respond with a SPECIFIC response to my SPECIFIC questions.

  • @RoatanBill
    @Odd Rabbit

    I strongly disagree when the countries involved are nuclear powers. The lesser countries are just bullshitting their populations by having a military that can't possibly fight off the big guys in the neighborhood, Ukraine being the perfect example.

    With nukes, all you need is a potent delivery system to make your mafia area free from incursion by anyone that doesn't have a death wish. Look at that shithole Israel for proof of how potent a nuclear deterrent is, at least for several decades until even that won't prevent an attempt to finally get even for the minor incursions it has made over those decades. A nuke deterrent for a peaceful nation would work in perpetuity, but won't work forever for a bully nation such as Israel.

    It's the availability of the morons and murderers in the world's militaries that provide the incentive to use them for politically inspired (money) projects. The costumed morons are cannon fodder for the political class and are willing to go along with the scam because they are mostly lazy ignorant slobs that don't want to actually work for a living, being welfare recipients that may some day be put in the line of fire.

    The major nuclear powers will continue pushing for the annihilation of mankind because they are criminal organizations that want their human farm animals to benefit them at all cost. They create the conditions whereby the stupid and or lazy opt for a military life because they have few other options. Poor education is a feature not a bug of modern society in the belligerent nations to make sure there are enough human trash to staff their militaries.

    This mechanism, this cycle of forever war and conflict, needs to be broken by a nation that has nukes and then gets rid of their military and force projection to concentrate on economic means to show the world how they can function peacefully. It is the existence of the military and the waste it represents that will forever fuel conflict that only benefits the sociopaths at the top.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

    When you strongly disagree so what’s your advise to BRICS-countries to survive and win the battle against the WEF-mafia and R-sild of London who want to destroy them.
    I cannot see other than strong mic/military as final strategy. They must have the same weapons the attacker has. Only so they can prevent falling prey to zionist neocons.
    You can see it in middle-east too:
    if Iran has not the same weapons as Israel so it will be destroyed like Irak.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    @Odd Rabbit

    I'm going to hazard a guess that you believe that Russia, China, the Brics in general, are somehow different from the US murderers, the Israeli murderers, the Iranian murderers, the Hezbollah murderers, the Hamas murderers, etc.

    All governments are criminal organizations that their populations simply can't identify as such due to conditioning and gov't 'education' that is actually propaganda. The religious sociopaths from centuries ago that invented the fraud of 'god' were the model upon which the highwaymen of old formed the original governments. Today, the entire planet has mafias with flags that rule every corner. These mafias only want what is best for themselves and don't give a shit about their own populations that they gladly sacrifice at gun point (draft) in some made up war for profit.

    It's identifying with your captors, Stockholm Syndrome, that is the mental condition that keeps people coalescing around their own mafia to support the slaughter of 'the other'. Russia doesn't want to terminate the WEF mania, they want to lead a variation of it that benefits them more than the current conditions. The CCP is the Chinese mafia and has built out their infrastructure to have their asian farm animals work for their ultimate benefit. Any temporary increase in the living standards of their peasants is a side effect of the ultimate purpose the CCP is after, being top dog. All governments are just mafias that want to rule over all the worlds human farm animals, nothing more.

    As long as these stupid people keep cooperating in their own ever tightening enslavement, there is no possible way of enhancing the human condition. In my entire life time, things have progressively worsened with every election, with every new phony entitlement, with every new war. It's time to stop the insanity that has proven time and time again to not be the answer for human progress.

    Anarchists did not try to carry out genocide against the Armenians in Turkey; they did not deliberately starve millions of Ukrainians; they did not create a system of death camps to kill Jews, gypsies, and Slavs in Europe; they did not fire-bomb scores of large German and Japanese cities and drop nuclear bombs on two of them; they did not carry out a 'Great Leap Forward' that killed scores of millions of Chinese; they did not attempt to kill everybody with any appreciable education in Cambodia; they did not launch one aggressive war after another; they did not implement trade sanctions that killed perhaps 500,000 Iraqi children.
    In debates between anarchists and statists, the burden of proof clearly should rest on those who place their trust in the state. Anarchy's mayhem is wholly conjectural; the state's mayhem is undeniably, factually horrendous.
    Robert Higgs

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

  • @Zoz43
    First, WW2 was not necessary or just. It was caused by FDR putting crippling sanctions on Japan because war was his end goal. Period. Paragraph. The Japanese attack on Pearl was no "sneak attack". Read Hawaiian newspapers for the week prior to December 7, 1941 to figure out how "secret" the attack was.

    Second, we are not all brothers. Our planet is infested by monsters that have no conscience and other monsters that believe they are the master race or the chosen race. I argue that these walking meatsacks are not fully human and will never be fully human -- their genome is somehow crippled in ways we don't (yet) understand.

    Right now, we are drowning and going down for the last count. If anything of value of human civilization is to survive, we need war, right now, to ramp down the bad elements.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @1jonny

    Agree.
    “If anything of value of human civilization is to survive, we need war, right now, to ramp down the bad elements.”

    That’s true. We are already in this war and we must win it. It’s a war of defense, not of attack. The war of defense against the attacker, the R-sild money lendering banker mafia of London and R-feller FED who want to make us slaves of debt and wants to conquer the whole world for itself.

  • @RoatanBill
    @Odd Rabbit


    Of course every country has its own MIC and if you are attacked you must have one.
     
    This may have been true until recently, but not any longer. Today, with nuclear weapons that can reduce entire cities to ashes, the logic has changed but no one wants to admit it.

    If, for example, the US were to get rid of all their murderers in costume and simply declared that any incursion or violence toward the US territory would be met with a missile response, possibly nuclear, who would dare to test that warning?

    Think of the reduced expense by not housing, feeding, clothing and medically caring for the dregs in the military that now must actually work for a living instead of playing in the dirt. Think of the weapons manufacturers that go under because there's no outlet for their antique product; no use for artillery, surface war ships (floating coffins), fighter jets that no longer fight, etc.

    The US could use that 'peace dividend' better called a 'not stupid anymore dividend' to lower taxes and become the low cost producer of anything and everything anyone had a mind to pursue. Getting rid of the murderers in costume and their support systems flips the script on how humanity progresses. It's now the country that demilitarizes the fastest that wins the race to produce what the world actually wants.

    No longer would the best minds be creating bio-weapons, useless tanks, stupid war ships waiting to be sunk by a cheap missile, new and improves turkeys like the F35, etc. The best minds would be advancing civilization instead of racing to annihilate it as is the case now.

    The current geopolitical environment may lead to a nuclear exchange and maybe then people will wake up to the fact that we can no longer afford the idiocy of having the top scum of each 'country' start a war that has no winners.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Chris Moore, @rgl

    “Of course every country has its own MIC and if you are attacked you must have one.”

    What I have meant with that is that in the current world under the zionist US regime who is ready to bomb you if you don’t obey its a must, …you must have ‘some kind of MIC’ if you want to secure your sovereignty.
    That’s the reason why Russia and BRICS-countries must have their own MIC/strong military if they want to survive. The zionist led US force them to that. It would mean suicide for them if they don’t have a strong military but it’s only a military to defense not to attack.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    @Odd Rabbit

    I strongly disagree when the countries involved are nuclear powers. The lesser countries are just bullshitting their populations by having a military that can't possibly fight off the big guys in the neighborhood, Ukraine being the perfect example.

    With nukes, all you need is a potent delivery system to make your mafia area free from incursion by anyone that doesn't have a death wish. Look at that shithole Israel for proof of how potent a nuclear deterrent is, at least for several decades until even that won't prevent an attempt to finally get even for the minor incursions it has made over those decades. A nuke deterrent for a peaceful nation would work in perpetuity, but won't work forever for a bully nation such as Israel.

    It's the availability of the morons and murderers in the world's militaries that provide the incentive to use them for politically inspired (money) projects. The costumed morons are cannon fodder for the political class and are willing to go along with the scam because they are mostly lazy ignorant slobs that don't want to actually work for a living, being welfare recipients that may some day be put in the line of fire.

    The major nuclear powers will continue pushing for the annihilation of mankind because they are criminal organizations that want their human farm animals to benefit them at all cost. They create the conditions whereby the stupid and or lazy opt for a military life because they have few other options. Poor education is a feature not a bug of modern society in the belligerent nations to make sure there are enough human trash to staff their militaries.

    This mechanism, this cycle of forever war and conflict, needs to be broken by a nation that has nukes and then gets rid of their military and force projection to concentrate on economic means to show the world how they can function peacefully. It is the existence of the military and the waste it represents that will forever fuel conflict that only benefits the sociopaths at the top.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit

  • Historically speaking, the only wars that this country fought that were arguably ethically justified were…World War II. All the others were unjustified imperialist adventures or other forms of waste or unnecessary nonsense. Furthermore, I do not honor veterans or consider them “heroes.” Other than the WWII vets, none of them fought for “freedom” or “democracy.”

    Talk about someone completely brainwashed by the Establishment’s narrative. WWII was not about “freedom” and “democracy” it was about destroying a power that challenged international finance (ie Germany) and indebting the English and Europe and transferring their wealth to America so that international finance could set up an empire that was better strategically located. “Democracy” was chosen because it is an easy way for oligarchs to shape the naive public mind and socially engineer a passive society via the media and entertainment industries they own, the NGOs they own, the politicians they finance and cabinet members they install, the academy they finance, etc. If you own the sources of information and define what is true than you direct the public and each side of the political and cultural divide and they know well how to dialectically shape opposites, harness the resulting energy and direct it towards their will.

    You literally know less than nothing about WWII.

    To say that WWII was the good war is an inversion of reality that has been planted into your mind by the winning side’s propaganda. The winning side was international finance, the Jewish Establishment and their Shabbos goy who are selling out mankind so that they can serve the most misanthropic, gaslighting, psychopathic tribal elites on the planet.

    The Western European peoples have been their dupes for a long, long time—fighting their wars and now destroying their own progeny and futures because the Synagogue of Satan and their whores have decided their breed of cattle is no longer useful to their hegemonic global governance aims.

    • Agree: Bert, Odd Rabbit, Malla, Caroline
    • Replies: @Caroline
    @Anonymous44

    I used to believe the mainstream-history of the 20th century until about the start of the Ukraine war.
    Since then I have come to believe that the mainstream history of WW1 and especially WW2 is more false than not.

    What now shocks me, is that even non-mainstream political pundits in the media, who in my opinion are a lot closer to the truth in regards to the Ukraine war, seem to believe in basically ALL the lies about WW2 and even stuff that not even allied propaganda stated. (The only person, who occasionally contradicts these mainstream-views is Colonel Douglas Macgregor, but only to an extent. )

    In the last few months I saw:
    - Larry Wilkerson (a former CIA-analyst!) state on Judge Napolitano, that the main victims of the German euthanasia-program were Jews (AFAIK not even the mainstream-historians say so)
    -Kim Iversen stating that the holocaust is true "because we have all the German records", meaning the Allies are in possession of a bunch of German records detailing the holocaust, when even mainstream holocaust scholar like Raul Hillberg have come to the conclusion that the holocaust originated "from a mental convergence of far-flung German bureaucrats"
    -and Judge Napolitano stating that the Germans conquerored Austria, who wanted to be independant (he must have seen "The sound of music")


    But IMO the most brainwashed person must be Robert Stinnett. Robert Stinnett was a revisionist historian of WW2, but only about the attack on Pearl Harbor. He wrote a book about it, that detailed, how Roosevelt and other high-ranking military had known about the attack and let it happen, so that Roosevelt could involve the US in WW2 against Germany.

    If you want to laugh (or cry) I would suggest to you to listen to this one-hour-long podcast with Scott Horton:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yny0vAZqcq4&t=2664s

    In the podcast he states, that
    -Roosevelt tricked the US into WW2, but that was good thing (basically a "noble lie"), because the Germans wanted to conquer the US and if the US had not joined WW2 then, it would have been too late to defend the US
    -he thinks after the Germans had conquerored Britain, they would have used the Royal Navy and used it to conquer the US
    -after the successful conquest of Britain the Germans might have also launched an attack from Canada
    -the Germans might also have attacked from the Caribean
    -the US could have just embargoed Japan, but Germany could not be embargoed (I wonder, what happened in WW1?)

  • @Gore 2004
    I support a war unless it benefits the American interest or the country was attacked.

    Republicans have been angry that the Cold War ended in 1991, so defense spending has to be high or else America is weak.

    So we are ALWAYS going to be in a warrish mood.

    Replies: @HammerJack, @Odd Rabbit, @Davy Crockit, @Art

    “I support a war unless it benefits the American interest or the country was attacked.”

    AJS in the article says:
    “The main reason they are fighting is because of the outside pushing of the American Empire, the profit motive of the American military-industrial complex, the power motive of corrupt Ukrainian politicians, and the propaganda and brainwashing on both sides of the conflict.
    In addition, I suspect that Russia, like the United States, has its own military-industrial complex that is profiting from the prolonging of this stupid war.”

    Of course every country has its own MIC and if you are attacked you must have one.
    But Russia has not build her own MIC to seek wars and attack other countries as the US but under severe duress and in the fear of being attacked by US/Nato and to defense for her own country.

    So the attacker in my opinion has the main responsibility for the existence of Russian MIC which serves only the sovereignty of Russia.
    There is a big difference compared to the MIC of US.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    @Odd Rabbit


    Of course every country has its own MIC and if you are attacked you must have one.
     
    This may have been true until recently, but not any longer. Today, with nuclear weapons that can reduce entire cities to ashes, the logic has changed but no one wants to admit it.

    If, for example, the US were to get rid of all their murderers in costume and simply declared that any incursion or violence toward the US territory would be met with a missile response, possibly nuclear, who would dare to test that warning?

    Think of the reduced expense by not housing, feeding, clothing and medically caring for the dregs in the military that now must actually work for a living instead of playing in the dirt. Think of the weapons manufacturers that go under because there's no outlet for their antique product; no use for artillery, surface war ships (floating coffins), fighter jets that no longer fight, etc.

    The US could use that 'peace dividend' better called a 'not stupid anymore dividend' to lower taxes and become the low cost producer of anything and everything anyone had a mind to pursue. Getting rid of the murderers in costume and their support systems flips the script on how humanity progresses. It's now the country that demilitarizes the fastest that wins the race to produce what the world actually wants.

    No longer would the best minds be creating bio-weapons, useless tanks, stupid war ships waiting to be sunk by a cheap missile, new and improves turkeys like the F35, etc. The best minds would be advancing civilization instead of racing to annihilate it as is the case now.

    The current geopolitical environment may lead to a nuclear exchange and maybe then people will wake up to the fact that we can no longer afford the idiocy of having the top scum of each 'country' start a war that has no winners.

    Replies: @Odd Rabbit, @Chris Moore, @rgl

  • Jewish activism throughout the West follows very similar broad patterns, including a noticeable over-representation in pro-immigration and pro-diversity movements, and in other areas which can be classed as demographically and culturally aggressive and harmful to the interests of the native population. An ancillary pattern to this activism is a strident defensiveness that borders on paranoia,...
  • CIA (approved for release, 2 pages):

    Speech of Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich before a special meeting of the Emergency Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, January 12, 1952.

    Excerpt:

    “I can safely promise you that before ten years have passed our race will take its rightful place in the world, with every Jew a king and every gentile a slave…

    … I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born. Our Control Commissions will, in the interest of peace and wiping our inter-racial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with whites. The white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with dark women. Thus, the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white means the end of the white men, and our most dangerous enemy will become only memory…”

    https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80R01731R003000180037-4.pdf

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit