RSSI left the “who was Shakespeare” conspiracy theory out of this article because I was already going out on enough limbs, and also because I don’t have anything to add to Ron Unz’s essay.
I don’t think the “suspect” is an actor, but he could have been manipulated. I would class this as a suspicious event based on the convenient “Holocaust survivor” just happening to be there, the “burning Jews” motif, the fact that the targets were just garden-variety demonstrators (not war criminals/Israeli government people/high-level Zionists) and that most of their injuries were extremely minor. It has the earmarks of a PR stunt, but who knows.
You may not have noticed that your “snappy comeback” not only implicitly accepts my claims about Jewish tribal psychopathy, mendaciousness, and usury-based currency control, but also my prediction that the goyim will wake up and end it. Your “devastating” reply is that (yes it will happen but) not in my lifetime. Maybe not—I’m 66—but your acknowledgment that the awakening is coming cheers me to the depths of my “antisemitic” soul ; – )
I've been working him over these last few days, showing him things like this:
You may not have noticed that your “snappy comeback” not only implicitly accepts my claims about Jewish tribal psychopathy, mendaciousness, and usury-based currency control, but also my prediction that the goyim will wake up and end it. Your “devastating” reply is that (yes it will happen but) not in my lifetime. Maybe not—I’m 66—but your acknowledgment that the awakening is coming cheers me to the depths of my “antisemitic” soul ; – )
I wonder how much time passed between the posting of this article and Jonathan Greenblatt getting on the phone with Sam Altman ordering him to “fix” the “bug” in his software.
Replies: @muh muh, @mulga mumblebrain, @Kevin Barrett, @Anonymous45
Washington sanctions ICC judges over Gaza genocide probe
Four judges were targeted for authorizing investigations into US and Israeli war crimes, as Washington escalates its campaign to cripple the court
JUN 6, 2025
On 5 June, the US government imposed sanctions on four International Criminal Court (ICC) judges over their role in investigations into war crimes by US and Israeli forces.
The US State Department said the sanctions freeze any assets the judges hold in the country and ban them from any transactions involving US citizens or institutions, cutting them off from the US financial and legal system. This includes a ban on US banks, companies, or individuals from sending money, offering services, or cooperating with the judges through international bodies.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions in a written statement, accusing the ICC of overstepping its authority and threatening the sovereignty of the US and Israel.
...
https://thecradle.co/articles/washington-sanctions-icc-judges-over-gaza-genocide-probe
When the 99.8% of humans who are non-Jewish have fully awakened to the psychopathic lies of the .2% (less than that, actually, since many Jews are non-tribal) and the .2% sanction the 99.8% for antisemitism, then the 99.8% will no longer be allowed to use Jew money. Boo-hoo! I can’t imagine how the goyim will survive without usurious fiat funny-money.
Holy fuck, the irony. Here's what you said at the end of your little screed:
When the 99.8% of humans who are non-Jewish have fully awakened to the psychopathic lies
You assholes always want it both ways. Psychopathic lies? The entire foundational underpinning of monotheism is a 'psychopathic lie'.
based on self-evidently ludicrous claims that their genocidal bronze-age deity gave it to them three thousand years ago.
She can find it in Kevin's mind.Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Pythas, @ariadna, @ghali, @Buck Ransom
Though a “Holocaust survivor” entitled to endless reparations from the goyim, she had never seen the inside of a concentration camp, much less a “gas chamber.”
The alleged mass execution gas chambers of WWII do seem to exist in many people’s minds. But mine, not so much. I’m not denying them, just saying based on what I’ve read the revisionists have better arguments and evidence.
The guy who used to work for Portnoy should watch this Monty Python clip, it will cheer him up: https://youtu.be/CJgumT70FSY?si=-2wuwJX_xjmpslzh
Video Link
And it gets worse: “Mossad Dresses Up as Muslims, Throws Glenn Greenwald Off Roof” https://truthjihad.com/2025/05/31/mossad-dresses-up-as-muslims-throws-glenn-greenwald-off-roof/
LOL
"The operation opened with Unit 8200 posting “Glen Greenwald is gay” on the internet, while real world operatives scribbled the same formula, along with variations such as “for a good time call Glenn Greenwald,” on bathroom walls.
Having destroyed the target’s reputation, a crack black ops team was dispatched to Brazil. Israeli special forces donned stereotypical Muslim apparel, including keffiyehs, djellabas, abayas, throbes, baju melayus, shemaghs, kufis, taqiyahs, topis, songkoks, and even a couple of Sikh turbans to really rile up the islamophobes. They then grabbed Greenwald, hustled him up to the roof, and threw him off, screaming “Allahu akbar” with a Hebrew accent at the top of their lungs."
The Boulder molotov cocktail attack re-incinerated a genocide-supporting Holocaust survivor. You can’t make this stuff up:
https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/genocide-supporting-holocaust-survivor
I can't subscribe to that. On issues like Trannys or DEI, Trump may differ from the mainstream, if only from the Democrats, but anything that involves the empire, he is only marginally different than Joe Biden. FISA 702, Middle East (e.g. Syria), China (export restrictions, Taiwan), bioweapons, arms sales, sanctions... Where exactly is the difference to Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton? There is none.
These people, who represent about half the population and a strong majority of its elite, are unhappy about Trump Regime 2.0 for a long list of reasons, chief among them being Trump’s chaotic, half-deliberate half-accidental dismembering of the American Empire.
Exactly the same here. The neocons are constantly spreading propaganda that Russia is on the verge of collapse and that Putin has cancer, but the nonsense spread by many opponents of the proxy war is not much better. If other currencies are so much better and exclusion from the USD system is not a bad thing because you can simply trade with the oh-so-great BRICS currencies, why are Iran or Russia even negotiating with the US? Why do the rouble and Iran's currency react to sanctions news and not the USD? Why was Trump able to drive the Chinese company ZTE to ruin within a day in 2018 via an EO, which Xi was able to avert with a phone call, while the Chinese can't do the same with Lockheed or Raytheon even though their arms sales to Taiwan obviously make them furious?
Just like US sanctions policies, which by over-sanctioning the world have encouraged other nations to start exiting the US-controlled dollar sphere, Trump’s erratic tariffs have forced Chinese ships with goods intended for Americans to deliver those goods elsewhere—and accept in return currencies more viable, at least in the long term, than Uncle Scam’s toilet paper dollar.
Well, I think most of the liberal Establishment sincerely believes that Trump 2.0’s evisceration of US soft power is a disaster for the Empire. They are probably right, though the consequences won’t be fatal right away.
As for the toilet paper dollar, you’re wrong about the US share of global payments, which was around 45% a decade ago and has fallen to almost 40%—a modest decline (so far) that has only mildly eroded the basis of the world’s biggest-ever scam. But it’s clear where things are headed. The only question is how fast.
You need to brush up on your dialogism. Any reasonably careful reader can figure out that this article is by a Muslim, published in an Islamic magazine, represents a Muslim’s take on the topic, and ends with a call for Muslims to help solve the problem of rule by the vicious rather than the virtuous by drawing on their own tradition. (That doesn’t exclude other approaches/solutions from other faiths and worldviews.)
If you’re interested in a fair-minded non-Muslim’s take on Muslim efforts to create Godly societies over 1400 years of history, check out Marshall Hodgson’s magisterial trilogy The Venture of Islam.
Are you saying that all Islamic worldviews must be banned from the Unz Review? Why? Unz features traditional and not-so-traditional Catholics, Orthodox, leftists, rightists, centrists, racists, America-lovers, America-haters, Putin-lovers, Putin-haters, revisionists of this or that stripe…so why is Islam off-limits? Are you afraid to hear what a Muslim thinks?
Because you are garbage people with a garbage "religion".
Are you saying that all Islamic worldviews must be banned from the Unz Review? Why?
Because you are garbage people with a garbage "religion".
Unz features traditional and not-so-traditional Catholics, Orthodox, leftists, rightists, centrists, racists, America-lovers, America-haters, Putin-lovers, Putin-haters, revisionists of this or that stripe…so why is Islam off-limits?
A Muslim thinks?! That's pretty funny. Muslims are the bastard off-shoots of the Hebrew "religion" None of you POS sand-dwellers "thinks" to the extent that real humans give a shit.You really blew it when you abandoned your western roots to dwell among the people of the sand, Kevin. I pity you.You should have stuck with your Germanic roots.
Are you afraid to hear what a Muslim thinks?
Right, but scattered among the weak/bogus ones, I surmise, are some with massively damaging material, quite possibly including the Katie Johnson case. I assume the Kosher Nostra has been whispering “don’t worry, Mr. Trump, as long as you serve us we will protect you.”
The Firesign Theater tag-line “Everything You Know Is Wrong” may have been mistaken with respect to the claim that “dogs flew spaceships,” but it aptly describes World War II.
Leo Strauss would deplore Unz’s truth-telling about the war not only because the truth should never be spoken, only obliquely hinted at, but also because it doesn’t lend itself to white hats vs. black hats treatment, since the major belligerents were all black hats. I suppose a case could be made that Hitler was the least-worst of a bad lot, and the Jews the worst-worst, but we all know the fact that such a case can easily be made is one reason why nobody is allowed to say anything negative about Jews, notice their immense power, or critique their received Hollywood version of the war (much less stop their genocide of Palestine.)
While this article was commissioned by Crescent International, the leading independent Muslim voice on public affairs, I hoped it would have crossover appeal. I imagined a non-Muslim reader agreeing with most of it until the end, reacting as you did, and then letting the worldview-jolt enable some “thinking outside the box.” Bottom line: Muslims and non-Muslims, religious people and secular people, should be able to agree that making virtue a prerequisite for leadership is both extremely difficult, and desperately needed, especially in today’s world, where leadership is growing ever-more psychopathic.
Regarding Trump’s alleged rapes of Katie Johnson:
“There were real threats that forced (Katie Johnson) to drop the lawsuit…On the day Johnson was supposed to participate in a press conference arranged by attorney Lisa Bloom, whom the attorneys hired to conduct their media outreach, Johnson’s car and cellphone were stolen, Goldman said. ‘This freaked her out and that is when she decided not to go through with it.’”
https://sacramento.newsreview.com/2019/10/21/wait-katie-johnson-actually-exists/
Nice satire here:
“We’re saying nice things about the Liverpool driver now that he is white British
Did you know he has a lovely family?”In the immediate aftermath of the horrific incident in Liverpool which left 79 people injured, the finest patriots were sure the driver was a foreign Muslim immigrant who doesn’t share our values. Naturally, we were overcome with hatred, not just for the driver but for all foreigners, Muslims and immigrants. What else would you expect us to do?
Instead of taking a moment to reflect on the horror, we jumped online to demand mass deportations, only for police to spoil our hate-fest within an hour by announcing the suspect is white British.
White. Fucking. British.
Bollocks…
https://www.normalisland.co.uk/p/were-saying-nice-things-about-the
Forced migration covers quite a number of possibilities, hardly limited to genocide. Present actions and proposals consist of deporting illegal migrants back to where they came from (or paying them to leave). That may involve some degree of force, but so do acts that are widely accepted, from towing away cars parked in a no-parking zone to subduing criminals.If you haven't been back to the US recently, especially outside Washington, DC, New York, or the world of think tanks, you may not realize how much the immigration invasion has already enforeignated the country. I can step outside in my middle-class-neighborhood apartment complex and hear people talking in Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, and unidentifiable tongues ... English rarely enough that it's always noteworthy.Can you blame people for feeling strongly about having their own nationality and culture removed from them without their consent? Yet by world standards our besieged natives are remarkably tolerant of the immigrants themselves; their anger is directed at the politicians and oligarchy behind the Great Replacement. I don't hear of or read about any "racist hysteria." The slippery slope seems as slippery as glue.Replies: @Kevin Barrett
“Forced remigration” a.k.a. ethnic cleansing a.k.a. genocide is being hyped by the Zionist billionaires, and foisted on gullible white dupes ...
“Can you blame people for feeling strongly about having their own nationality and culture removed from them without their consent?” Not at all. A non-hysterical truth-based anti-immigration movement would be great. I like Unz’s plan (as I recall) to impose harsh penalties, i.e. substantial prison sentences, on anyone who employs illegals; substantially raise the minimum wage and impose similarly harsh penalties on employers who cheat; and crack down on dicey employment visas. Net result: vastly less immigration. No ethnic cleansing necessary.
I’m definitely anti-human AND 100% anti-Hamas also..
Let me take a few wild guesses to clear things up for you. You say:
I find it difficult to understand why nuclear weapons are forbidden [Haram]…
Because their explosions are so large they inevitably and massively harm civilians and civilian infrastructure?
when a city underground in Iran full of the most advanced ballistic missiles can kill thousands of civilians if directed against for instance Tel Aviv, and for some reason is legitimate.
Because those missiles are intended to be used against military targets, not civilians?
Another anomaly is how can a Muslim nation like Yemen attack various Israeli ports including Ben Gurion airport and Haifa from 2000 kilometers away, and the well equipped Hezbollah refuse to attack Haifa port a mere 30 miles away or Ben Gurion airport, an attack on both could cause the Israeli economy to disintegrate?
Because the damage to civilians from the Yemeni strikes is relatively minor and mostly symbolic/economic, whereas if Hezbollah got into a tit-for-tat game of targeting civilians then huge numbers of civilians on both sides would be killed?
Many Muslims take seriously their religion’s teachings on the ethics of warfare, which is why al-Qaeda’s claim that “the West has killed millions of our civilians, so we have the right to kill thousands of theirs” never got much traction (maximum 20% approval) while ISIS’s headchopping got almost none at all.
At least loggers have the guts to go head-to-head with the trees. Cowardly mercenary slaves “fighting” for their bankster owners drop bombs on wedding parties from safe altitudes, or murder women and kids with drones using video game interfaces.
Good point. Bring on “time machine terrorism!”
G0od point that “were his actions morally justified or not? Philosophy students will be studying this very difficult question 100 years from now.” This case is a kind of Rorschach test because it’s in the “sweet spot” between an obviously morally justified action, like killing one or more bona fide obviously-guilty genocidal Zionist war criminals and explaining it in a perfect manifesto, and a morally unjustified action, like shooting a bunch of random people outside a pro-Zionist synagogue and leaving a stupid/crazy manifesto.
An uncharacteristically excellent comment from Dullahtard Dimples, whose hope for a “New Muslim Dark Ages” (i.e. an Islam-based civilizational upswing that would be the “Dark Ages” for those left out of it, like the original Islamic Golden Age) I share.
Replies: @muh muh
"This is what the LORD says: Administer justice and righteousness. Rescue the victim of robbery from the hand of his oppressor. Do no wrong or violence to the foreigner, the fatherless, or the widow. Do not shed innocent blood in this place".Jer. 22:8 - Berean Standard Bible
I apologizer for the oversight. Didn’t mean to leave Canada out of ClownWorld.
Check out my debate with Jasun Horsley about whether Kubrick was a whistleblower, and whether Eyes Wide Shut is as bad/pointless as he thinks. https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_stanley-kubrick-whistleblowing-satirist-or-ai-transhumanist/
Kevin, I’d like to draw your attention elsewhere. To the CNN statement of Jonathan Epstein. The tone of voice, its waver, and the construction of his words put me in mind of the guy who on live TV described the downing of the first tower on 9/11. And his reference to the eyes of pro-Palestine protestors at Columbia when he was a student is an outright lie. You must have access to those voice stress analyzers. See what the verdict is.
https://twitter.com/Lek_leahchoc/status/1925623507037081842
If this clearly points to false flag, what is one to make of the manifesto?
You probably follow media discussion about immigration more thoroughly than I do so maybe I'm missing the toxic rhetoric you say you find. But with occasional exceptions, it seems to me the overwhelming percentage of "lies, crass emotional manipulations," etc. emerge from open borders advocates. They charge us with racism (that verbal poison dart), "hate," xenophobia, and similar.But for discussion let's say you are on the mark about immigration restrictionists' language and choler. Does intemperate speech invalidate a principle? Sometimes what is said is more important than who says it, or how.Let me offer an analogy. Here on the Unz Review I often find distasteful comments from readers who, in the abstract, I could agree with. But their writing is laced with vulgarity, misspellings, bad grammar, exaggeration, and illogic. I'm embarrassed to be allied with them. Does that make me want to be a turncoat? No.You are an educated man who writes clearly. Probably you are uncomfortable with comments on your posts that are subliterate, ill-tempered, and ignorant. Still, you and they are on common ground when they're critical of Israel and Jews. Do you back off because some of your supporters are ungracious? You shouldn't, and you don't.Replies: @Pierre de Craon, @Kevin Barrett
My sympathy for anti-immigration folks diminishes every time I come across one of these lies, crass emotional manipulations, hysterical exaggerations, or deceptive distortions—which is to say, about every 30 seconds.
“Does intemperate speech invalidate a principle? Sometimes what is said is more important than who says it, or how.” That’s a good point. It’s why I support restricting immigration despite the hysterical lies of so many anti-immigrant types.
But the problem goes deeper than just bad arguments. Racist hysteria based on lies isn’t just “bad arguments,” it’s a “madness of crowds” phenomenon that could lead to disaster and widespread avoidable suffering.
“Forced remigration” a.k.a. ethnic cleansing a.k.a. genocide is being hyped by the Zionist billionaires, and foisted on gullible white dupes, to whitewash the genocide of Palestine and later the rest of Greater Antichrist Israel. If enough Europeans and Americans can be brainwashed into thinking ethnic cleansing is OK, the genocidal Zionist freaks will have a much easier time doing it.
And though it’s highly unlikely that Greater Europe will ever mass-expel citizens and legal residents based on their supposed ethnicity, hysterical movements terrorized by lies about crime that push for ethnic cleansing might well create a lot of pointless violence and suffering.
Forced migration covers quite a number of possibilities, hardly limited to genocide. Present actions and proposals consist of deporting illegal migrants back to where they came from (or paying them to leave). That may involve some degree of force, but so do acts that are widely accepted, from towing away cars parked in a no-parking zone to subduing criminals.If you haven't been back to the US recently, especially outside Washington, DC, New York, or the world of think tanks, you may not realize how much the immigration invasion has already enforeignated the country. I can step outside in my middle-class-neighborhood apartment complex and hear people talking in Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, and unidentifiable tongues ... English rarely enough that it's always noteworthy.Can you blame people for feeling strongly about having their own nationality and culture removed from them without their consent? Yet by world standards our besieged natives are remarkably tolerant of the immigrants themselves; their anger is directed at the politicians and oligarchy behind the Great Replacement. I don't hear of or read about any "racist hysteria." The slippery slope seems as slippery as glue.Replies: @Kevin Barrett
“Forced remigration” a.k.a. ethnic cleansing a.k.a. genocide is being hyped by the Zionist billionaires, and foisted on gullible white dupes ...
Ticks which false flag boxes? Here are mine:
1) Perpetrator unsympathetic and will be almost universally reviled. (No tick. Elias is a hero to billions, with a brilliant and inspiring manifesto that has effectively been immortalized.)
2) Perpetrator(s) dead; often killed when they should have been arrested and interrogated. (No tick.)
3) Timed to grease the skids for war or otherwise-hard-to-get policy objectives .(Not much of a tick…hard to see how this will trigger war on Iran or lead to more of a crackdown on pro-Palestine speech than there already is…more likely the contrary, as the PTB see that if pro-Palestine young people are silenced they will turn to this kind of direct action.)
4) Most importantly, gaping holes in the official story of how it went down. (No tick, at least so far.)
Agree with the exception of this. Why would it disturb the powers that be if young people 'turn to this kind of direct action'?
…more likely the contrary, as the PTB see that if pro-Palestine young people are silenced they will turn to this kind of direct action.)
Thank you for your reply. Your vapid hyper-general bloviations, and complete avoidance of empirical reality, confirm that you a troll, not an honest but misinformed commenter. Any non-troll would have at least attempted to find some empirical, statistical evidence concerning the relationship between Islamic religiosity and criminality or lack of it, such as Javid Jamil’s sweeping overview: https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2013/08/16/jamil-2/
Sure.I've been called worse, most often by your fellow supporters of jihad upon the remnants of the Christian West. As I recently wrote elsewhere, "No one in the pro-White camp should ever consent to use 'racism' or related words without their accompanying sneer quotes. The insult 'racist!' needs neither an answer nor an apology. It is a charge to be regarded with contempt."
… a troll, not an honest but misinformed commenter …
Your claim that “young Muslim men” assault pilgrims to Lourdes because they “hate Catholics” is bizarre. Every time I investigate some bizarre claim like this it turns out to be false or grossly exaggerated, meaning I once again wasted my time, so I’m inclined to take a pass on this one. On the off chance that there is some kernel of truth beneath the exaggeration here, I am 100% certain that it would not involve MUSLIM men. In other words, if immigrants commit more assaults in the vicinity of Lourdes than non-immigrants, I can guarantee you that the miscreants, a vanishingly small fraction of the overall immigrant population, are on average much less religious than the non-criminal vast majority, and that those who are genuinely practicing Muslims (praying 5 times, waking up for fajr, never missing a Friday at the mosque, etc.) never assault anyone, least of all Catholics, for whom they feel sympathy and respect, and whose religion they are charged to protect: https://covenantsoftheprophet.org
As for the notion that immigrants are supposedly overrepresented in sexual assaults in France, they will have to work pretty hard to catch up with the thousands or tens of thousands of rapes committed by these random French white guys: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/03/21/gisele-pelicot-will-release-her-memoir-a-hymn-to-life-in-2026-i-now-want-to-tell-my-story-in-my-own-words_6739380_4.html
I wouldn’t worry about him – JohnnyLeFellowBlanc looks like a Jew pretending to be a racist White to achieve tribal strategies. I’ve seen this strategy a lot on 4chan and Twitter since October, of Jews pretending to be racist Whites to try to get the White man not to care about Israel’s genocide (by appealing to any innate White-racist sentiment). Now I wasn’t sure he was Jewish based on that alone, but the “performative” talking point seals it for me – this was used a lot by Jews shortly after October 7 on social media as a way of delegitimising the peaceful protests in Western cities (cf. David Baddiel’s Twitter feed) – it was clear that this was a transnational agreed talking point. Plus he has the Jewish arrogance to proclaim how other people feel about things. That there is the general histrionic tone of his posts while demonstrating psychopathic indifference to others.
Jews also commonly tell white people what to do. It’s innate in them. From “Johnny”:
When I say we should wipe our hands of all this, I mean we should stop supporting either side.
At least MemeJoJo is openly a disgusting Jew, to remind the world why they are so hated by everyone throughout all of recorded history (MemeJoJo right now getting a victimhood boner reading this). Either that, or MemeJoJo is an anti-Semite playing 3D chess, and posing as a Jew to stoke up levels of anti-Semitism. Either hypothesis has legs, because his commentary is such a hateful caricature, it’s like a seeing a A. Wyatt Mann cartoon in textual form.
I’m assuming that Rodriquez was making a political statement, not a petty personal one. And he targeted members of government, not passing civilians.
I can’t tell you when, but at some point, it becomes fair game. There are limits to everything. After nearly 2 years and protestors silenced, deported or locked up, free speech pulverized, and Israel having its way in every way imaginable, isn’t it about time?
If not for this (genocide in Gaza), then for what? Just when is it justified that human beings are so appalled that they resort to violence in collective punishment against all members of the regime and not just its military wing?
Sure, I’d prefer he went after high level officials, like a Ben Gvir, not a couple of cogs doing hasbara at the embassy, but I won’t condemn him.
A few months ago it became obvious that “no Jew, anywhere, will be safe,” and I posted that. Killing is always wrong, except in immediate self-defense, and some Quakers might argue,”not even then.” But, the Gaza Genocide has incited a moral outrage that has exploded as a reaction to the paralysis of the international community.
Killing two people whose involvement was peripheral may not stop the Genocide, but it does tell us that a growing number of people have reached the breaking point.
Rodriquez is a hero. He sacrificed his own life to deliver a necessary message. It’s almost no different from the self immolation of Aaron Bushnell.
Is it okay to kill? I don’t know, but there are limits to everything. Genocide cannot go on forever and good people do nothing. Little babies, 2 and 3, and children 7 and 9, can’t keep losing limb and life.
When Israel gets away with everything and protestors are allowed to say nothing, free speech is ground to dust, and S. Africa is scolded at the White House for dragging Israel to the ICJ, what is not permissible in the world of lies and ashes?
Since assassination has long been the official policy of the Israeli Government, every person who decides to work for that Government should realize that they may be a target for revenge because they are morally complicit in that policy.
By virtue their employment when their Government was actively engaged in a genocide of civilians, they forfeited their lives and any claim of innocence. The U.S. Government had a legal obligation to protect them because of diplomatic immunity, but Elias Rodriguez was driven by moral outrage to avenge the Palestinians. He considered them to be servants of a murderous regime, and they were.
He will be charged with of murder and will be convicted unless he gets a sympathetic juror, but in his mind he considers himself to be an avenger and combatant. This is a case in which moral law and statutory law may be conflicted.
Absolutely! Those are good anti-immigration arguments, and I agree with them, along with others (protecting the environment, etc.) which is why I favor restricting immigration. But all the lies and exaggerations about immigrants and crime, not to mention the made-in-Israel tidal wave of anti-Islam BS, alienate me from a movement I would otherwise support.
"Protecting the environment"??
Those are good anti-immigration arguments, and I agree with them, along with others (protecting the environment, etc.)
After the interview I followed his sources for “80% of French Women Want the Army Deployed In French Cities to Protect Them Against Immigrant-Invader.” But the actual poll, conducted by an extremely dubious outfit whose funding depends on whipping up hysteria, turned out to have nothing whatsoever to do with rape. (Because there is no “immigrant rape crisis” in France, and nobody, not even hysterical feminists who think you raped them if you looked at them sideways, thinks there is.) The problem the poll respondents supposedly want the military to solve is drug gang violence which disproportionately targets gang-member men, not women.
So Roberts’ headline is basically a lie.
My sympathy for anti-immigration folks diminishes every time I come across one of these lies, crass emotional manipulations, hysterical exaggerations, or deceptive distortions—which is to say, about every 30 seconds.
@Kevin can you please include some links to some of these "debunkings" and statistics?Replies: @Franz, @eah
Did you know that Pakistanis are actually less prevalent among sex criminals in the UK than white British people are? That's according to the official British statistics. Did you know that?
And the debunkings of this anti-immigrant rape army bullshit are vastly more convincing and better sourced and better documented than the claims that you're parroting here.
I can look up statistics pretty well. I'm pretty good at that. and i've been doing it and i said i i will be happy to send you some statistical sources to look at and then you can based on official crime statistics from these various countries and what you'll discover is that the the relationship between
But if you actually look at statistics and carefully compare things and stuff, what you'll find is this whole discourse of the alien invading rapists and stuff is just utter and complete bullshit.
You probably follow media discussion about immigration more thoroughly than I do so maybe I'm missing the toxic rhetoric you say you find. But with occasional exceptions, it seems to me the overwhelming percentage of "lies, crass emotional manipulations," etc. emerge from open borders advocates. They charge us with racism (that verbal poison dart), "hate," xenophobia, and similar.But for discussion let's say you are on the mark about immigration restrictionists' language and choler. Does intemperate speech invalidate a principle? Sometimes what is said is more important than who says it, or how.Let me offer an analogy. Here on the Unz Review I often find distasteful comments from readers who, in the abstract, I could agree with. But their writing is laced with vulgarity, misspellings, bad grammar, exaggeration, and illogic. I'm embarrassed to be allied with them. Does that make me want to be a turncoat? No.You are an educated man who writes clearly. Probably you are uncomfortable with comments on your posts that are subliterate, ill-tempered, and ignorant. Still, you and they are on common ground when they're critical of Israel and Jews. Do you back off because some of your supporters are ungracious? You shouldn't, and you don't.Replies: @Pierre de Craon, @Kevin Barrett
My sympathy for anti-immigration folks diminishes every time I come across one of these lies, crass emotional manipulations, hysterical exaggerations, or deceptive distortions—which is to say, about every 30 seconds.
I used to agree with PCR 95%, now it’s only around 80-85%, so we’re all in the same ball park.
Did we meet when I was an invited speaker at the Left Forum https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/why-chomsky-is-wrong-about-911 or the following year when I was banned but crashed the party?
For many years after I got involved in 9/11 activism and scholarship, I was plagued by a troll who would follow me around to my speaking events, picket them dressed up as V for Vendetta, and sometimes pretend to whip out a knife and throw it at me. The same individual would obsessively research every project I was involved in and write long emails to everyone else involved in those projects attacking me as a dangerous antisemite, and making a long list of false allegations, forcing them to waste time researching and debunking them.
That guy has apparently retired, presumably to a beachside villa in Haifa. My only regular troll now is this “Meamjojo” character whose beeper goes off every time I post at Unz, and whose comments seem designed to perfectly illustrate my thesis that Zionists are repulsive genocidal scumbags.
Maybe he/she/it is a paid troll, but if so, I’m the one who really should be paying.
“In 1939, heavy lobbying persuaded the National Association of Broadcasters to adopt a new rule tightly restricting the sale of radio time to ‘spokesmen of controversial public issues’… the FBI, the ADL, and his many other opponents made great efforts to find evidence that he was secretly receiving German funding…”
Fast forward to the 2010s. The same kind of “lobbyists” convinced internet oligarchs to cancel or shadowban “spokesmen of controversial public issues,” and “made great efforts to find evidence” that dissidents were secretly receiving Russian funding.
Same playbook…except the second time around they spiced it up with “beneficial cognitive diversity” like flat Earth and other tropes designed to make dissidents look crazy.
I would say Israel is cultural insanity by believing a fictional holy book then acting out the verse. Faith in the Holy Bible is what drives the modern insanity called Israel, and what is really interesting, the fables in the Old Testament (aka Torah) are proven fakes.
Israel is really a verb. To Israel someone means to barge into their home, murder some of the people living there (starting with the women and children), dance gleefully waving a blue-and-white flag while the survivors flee, and then insist the home is really yours, not theirs. If anyone asks why, tell them your Bronze Age tribal deity gave it to your ancestors thousands of years ago.
But that is not all. Not only are the stories of Abraham, Covenant, Moses, Israelites, Exodus, Solomon, Saul, and King David all fake, so are the so-called descendants of Ancient Israel. The Diaspora is also a myth proven by a top Israeli scholar Shlomo Sands.
Leading archaeologist says Old Testament stories are fiction
“Professor Thompson – from Marquette University in Milwaukee – says that there is a complete absence of archaeological and historical evidence for many events portrayed in the Bible. The inevitable conclusion, he argues, is that the Israelite exile in Egypt, the Exodus and the Israelite conquest of the Promised Land never took place.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/leading-archaeologist-says-old-testament-stories-are-fiction-1500431.html
We live in a very sick world in which fake Jews of Eastern Europe believe they are descendents of the Ancient Israelites - so they left their homelands of Eastern Europe and invaded Palestine to reclaim land that was never theirs, have no blood ancestry, based on words in proven fictional holy books - and to add to that madness are Zionist Evangelical loons, who also believe the holy book literal, are cheering them on, while they commit massive war crimes, bloodshed, terror, and genocide. What is really going on is batshit insanity caused by belief. The godly Christians of Amerika are also terrorists and the cheerleaders for Israeli terrorism. You can not make this stuff up, the church people are the most evil, god's chosen ones are monsters.
Ashkenazi Jews were Khazars who converted to Judaism in the 8th century AD in the Caucasus region. He asserted that Ashkenazi Jews had no historical connection to the Jews of biblical tradition ... The Khazars, originally from the Caucasus, later migrated westward, settling in present-day Hungary, Ukraine, Poland, Belarus, Lithuania, and Germany. The Jews of Poland, Lithuania, and Romania, who speak Yiddish, are all of Khazar origin.
https://countercurrents.org/2025/03/an-attempt-at-debunking-a-key-zionist-myth-by-an-israeli-academic/
Think about how damning this information is, the entire Holy Bible is fiction, the Jews are a fictional people, and they are invading Palestine because they believe the Bible fables to be literal, history. That would be like the followers of Harry Potter (who have compiled those 7 books into one holy bibliotheca) invading England in 2,000 years from now to reclaim their heritage and land because they believe the tales of Harry Potter to be divine revelation and stories of their ancestors.
“Countering official Zionist historiography, Sand questions whether the Jewish People ever existed as a national group with a common origin in the Land of Israel/Palestine. He concludes that the Jews should be seen as a religious community comprising a mishmash of individuals and groups that had converted to the ancient monotheistic religion but do not have any historical right to establish an independent Jewish state in the Holy Land. In short, the Jewish People, according to Sand, are not really a “people” in the sense of having a common ethnic origin and national heritage. They certainly do not have a political claim over the territory that today constitutes Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, including Jerusalem.”
https://www.cato.org/commentary/book-review-invention-jewish-people#
Think about how damning this information is, the entire Holy Bible is fiction, the Jews are a fictional people, and they are invading Palestine because they believe the Bible fables to be literal, history.
Neither the New Testament nor the Old Testament is history in the generally accepted meaning of the term. That is, nothing in the Bible can be verified by evidence contemporary with the events it relates.
The Old Testament is a group of stories, some of which have a common thread, whose origin is so obscure we have no rational way to penetrate the fog common to many proto-historical accounts. If the Jews of ancient times had their version of Herodotus, his works have been lost without a trace.
As for the New Testament, upon which the various Christian denominations base their theology, beginning in the 19th century scholars (plus in recent years popular writers) have tried to uncover the “real” Jesus story. All of them known to me have come up short, however clever their arguments.
This factual void does not disprove anything in the Jewish or Christian narrative. It simply means we are ignorant. To whatever extent we buy into the various narratives, we are acting on faith. Whether there is value in faith is a complex subject I won’t go into here, but it doesn’t justify crusades, European wars of religion, or … genocide in Gaza.
Do you have faith in the jew-constructed, golden calf fiat Federal Reserve/International bankster Ponzi? I bet you do. I bet you've got money on it, even though it's a total fiction that these ZOG debts can ever be paid.
To whatever extent we buy into the various narratives, we are acting on faith. Whether there is value in faith is a complex subject I won’t go into here, but it doesn’t justify crusades, European wars of religion, or … genocide in Gaza.
“As the Gaza genocide proceeds, you could write a long essay about the ethics of attacking an Israeli embassy (and Israel has not shown restraint in attacking other nations’ diplomatic premises…)”
Yes, you could, but I will write a short one instead. Here it is: “It would be ethical to attack an Israeli embassy.”
I have noticed that Dr. Polya has more respect for the mainstream “expert consensus” on this and other issues than my audience does. Theoretically, that should make him more mainstream-credible. Yet for some reason MSM resolutely ignores his work on Zio-US massacres of West Asians.
“Race and racialized thinking is inherently Jewish.” Beneath that overgeneralization is a grain of truth. Jews are the most significant highly-endogamous tribe in human history. They are highly-endogamous because their tribal leaders have been brainwashing them for millennia to believe that non-Jews are nasty, disgusting, less than fully human, unclean, inherently inferior creatures who are always trying to kill us (but we killed them first, so let’s eat!)
Jewish racists have profited mightily by trumpeting exaggerated claims of victimhood. They have taught others to try to do the same. American blacks, who have more plausible claims to victimhood than Jews do, have tried to follow the same path, with mixed results.
Now white nationalists are imitating Jews (and in their wake blacks, hispanics, gays, trannies, etc.) in posing as victims for fun and profit. Like Jews, whites are supposed to say: “We are a superior race! We should never mix with the inferior goyim/gentiles/mudpeople! And we are eternal victims! Look how badly we’re being victimized! The world owes us money! And power! And deference! Let’s build an ethnostate and kill/expel the lesser races!”
Zionism was a tragedy. Its white equivalent is a farce.
You’re intentionally misrepresenting White Nationalists (WN). WN are not interested in playing the victim card in an effort to win a gold medal in the oppression olympics. We merely explain to our people how a hostile elite has managed to dispossess us. Ever since WW2 our people have been subjected to a non-stop program of deracination. Coupled with the opening of the floodgates to the third world (post 1965 Hart-Celler), the last few decades have been an unmitigated disaster.
Now white nationalists are imitating Jews (and in their wake blacks, hispanics, gays, trannies, etc.) in posing as victims for fun and profit. Like Jews, whites are supposed to say: “We are a superior race! We should never mix with the inferior goyim/gentiles/mudpeople! And we are eternal victims! Look how badly we’re being victimized! The world owes us money! And power! And deference! Let’s build an ethnostate and kill/expel the lesser races!”
Zionism was a tragedy. Its white equivalent is a farce
Please tell me how this isn't just another an attack on that poor white girl and her baby for their complexion.
white nationalists
You say “The UK created the nation called Israel.” It would be more accurate to say “Israel created the nation called the UK,” which has been run by Jewish bankers for three centuries. The plan for Jews to rule the world from Jerusalem has been a constant for more than two millennia, and specific Zionist schemes for making it happen have been percolating at the upper levels of the Jewish community for more than 500 years, with the takeover of what would become the UK in 1655 being a step in that direction.
Israel created by and for WASPs?! Come on! Israel has been the name of the Jewish Nation for millennia. It’s short for Bani Israel, the sons of Israel (Jacob), and it names a tribe (a political entity based on supposed blood ties).
The Zionist state of Israel, which proclaims itself the state of all Jews everywhere, is the product of Jewish messianic millenarianism. Its real founders are people like Maimonides, David Reuveni and Solomon Molcho, Abarbanel, Isaac Louria and his followers, and of course the satanists and founders of the “Rothschild Religion” Shabtai Zvi and Jacob Frank.
Many Jews, like Menasseh Ben Israël, foisted their Jewish messianic millenarianism on Protestants, some of whom became the useful idiots of Project Antichrist and its architects, the leaders of (Bani) Israel.
Almost immediately following the creation of the Antichrist State of Israel in 1948, WASPs lost their position as the USA’s dominant ethnic group as the Jews took over. That fact alone torpedoes your thesis that Israel is a tool of WASP power.
Feb. 10, 1972. Billy Graham: “This stranglehold (of Jews over the media) has got to be broken or the country’s going down the drain.” Nixon: “You believe that?” Graham: “Yes, sir.” Nixon: “Oh, boy. So do I. I can’t ever say that but I believe it.” Graham: “If you get elected a second time, then we might be able to do something.”
He got elected a second time, but the strangleholders strangled him before he could “do something.”
And indeed the country has gone down the drain.
Well Butt Goy Graham certainly never did anything about it and even accepted an Israeli private jet for his personal transportation. Christ Cucks are a waste of energy.Replies: @Priss Factor
Feb. 10, 1972. Billy Graham: “This stranglehold (of Jews over the media) has got to be broken or the country’s going down the drain.” Nixon: “You believe that?” Graham: “Yes, sir.” Nixon: “Oh, boy. So do I. I can’t ever say that but I believe it.” Graham: “If you get elected a second time, then we might be able to do something.”
I was asked: “Shouldn’t the US be included since they’re funding this horrorshow?” I answered: “Absolutely. Though I would argue that ‘Israel’ is JUST a terrorist entity, or is at least primarily that, while the US is a bigger and more complicated case.”
The United States is the "Great Satan" while Israel is the "Little Satan" according to the Persian resistance to Rothschild Money Empire which wants all the oil in the Persian Gulf. The United States is the military enforcement arm of the Rothschild Central Banking empire, and via the Balfour Declaration the Jewish Rothschilds installed the fake state of Israel right in the middle of Arab central. Because the United States bankrolls the terrorist state of Israhell, it is equally complicit in genocide. Aiding and abetting a crime is equal to committing the crime. If the The International Court of Justice were to try and hang Bibi Netanyahu, they ought to hang Trump and all the other presidents also who helped Israel, not to mention the bankers in the City of London.Little shit Israel, armed to the teeth, populated by Jewish supremacists, is the knife in the middle of the back of Arab nations:
I was asked: “Shouldn’t the US be included since they’re funding this horrorshow?” I answered: “Absolutely. Though I would argue that ‘Israel’ is JUST a terrorist entity, or is at least primarily that, while the US is a bigger and more complicated case.”
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/st-5ofw0KAsSo the engine of this sick modern world of fractional reserve banking is fueled by war and the constant conflicts that “me only” racist people who can not live in peace with anyone else, are put in the middle of the Arab nations. I am told Jews are smart people, I would challenge that notion, if you believe in the Torah you are a dupe, if you move to Israel because you believe in your Jewish heritage you a banker pawn. The money men are using Zionism, Israel, and Amerika to make money and they do not care how many Jews and Goyim get killed in the process. So if you think about it, debt based money system is a scam fueled by endless war. How much debt has the USA accumulated since Israel did 911? How many jets and missiles were sold to Israel and other Arab states like Saudi Arabia? The Gulf Wars cost 6-8 trillion. Tiny little Israel, the size of New Jersey, has a huge airforce:https://www.globalmilitary.net/air_forces/isr/I highly recommend watching the post apocalypse movie "The Book of Eli" as a means of understanding how the ruling class views the Holy Bible - as a way to rule and organize a people under one banner. Gary Oldman does a star performance as a ruthless warlord who wants the last remaining Bible, which Denzel Washington (Eli) has in his possession. That movie spells it out exactly how the ruling class uses religion to inspire and control the rabble.It is no coincidence that the empire has fleets of fighter jets in Israel contesting Arab states for oil:
The Birth of the Scofield Bible
In the early 20th century, at the same time that monumental financial and political shifts were occurring - such as the founding of the Federal Reserve (1913) and the Balfour Declaration (1917) - a new version of the Bible was introduced.
It’s an IQ/courage test for the right: Are you smart enough to figure out that the same Zionist Jews who are destroying your country are the ones brainwashing you to hate Islam and Muslims? And are you courageous enough to say so?
You see less of her precisely because she went against Israel.
Sounds totally fake. Do you have a url?
Almost three weeks ago I wrote in American Free Press: “To accomplish this (Mideast peace and a new JCPOA) Trump will have to somehow neutralize Netanyahu and the Israeli hardliners. The best way to do that would be to bring down Netanyahu’s government. That could be accomplished by working in collaboration with Bibi’s political enemies, who are legion both in Israel and throughout the Jewish-oligarch-occupied West. (Not all Jewish oligarchs are Bibi fans.) Trump could help engineer regime change in Israel, timed to coincide with an agreement ending the genocide of Gaza and freeing all remaining prisoners. And if Bibi doesn’t like it? Terminate Bibi’s command…with extreme prejudice if necessary.” https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/trump-vs-iran-nuclear-deal-ii-or
Most readers thought that was unlikely. But it’s what political logic under the current balance of forces dictates.
It's possible that when Trump talked about hitting the Houthis with everything we had, and admiring their toughness for the fact that they were still standing, he was actually talking about the Palestinians bacause a) we didn't hit the Houthis with everything we had, and b) it was the Palestimians who have been hit with everything the Judeofascists have (except nukes) since 10/7*, and who are still standing.
“To accomplish this (Mideast peace and a new JCPOA) Trump will have to somehow neutralize Netanyahu and the Israeli hardliners. The best way to do that would be to bring down Netanyahu’s government.
Trump could neutralize the threat from Bibi by tweeting that those people who were dancing and celebrating 9/11 were actually dancing Israelis, and that he, Trump, supports Sen. Ron Johnson’s efforts to investigate the demolition of World Trade Center 7 by Larry “Pull It” Silverstein and a certain “Fire Department Commander” in Tel Aviv that Lucky Larry phones up every weekend.
https://www(dot)reddit(dot)com/r/conspiracy/comments/36vezj/haaretz_reported_shortly_after_911_that_netanyahu/
Both liberals and conservatives are often prisoners of their ideologies, unable to think an original thought, and eager to ban anything that challenges their beliefs. My high school librarian, Charlotte Smith, was the one breath of fresh air in a school full of boring teachers, because she was genuinely intellectually curious, with literary interests like Kurt Vonnegut and Herman Hesse, and nonfiction interests including Velikovsky, Von Daniken, Charles Fort, and other heretics. A lot of my high school education consisted of skipping classes and hanging out in the library.
Surely there are sentiments here with which we can concur, though you and I with our goyische reserve doubtless would have employed fewer exclamation points.Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Wokechoke, @Etruscan Film Star
"Mr. Portnoy," she said, raising her knapsack from the floor, "you are nothing but a self-hating Jew.""Ah, but Naomi, maybe that's the best kind.""Coward.""Tomboy." "Shlemiel!"And made for the door. Only I leaped from behind, and with a flying tackle brought this big red-headed didactic dish down with me onto the floor. I'll show her who's a shlemiel! And baby! And if have VD? Fine! Terrific! All the better! Let her carry it secretly back in her bloodstream to the mountains! Let it spread forth from her unto all those brave and virtuous Jewish boys and girls! A dose of clap will do them all good!This is what's it's like in the Diaspora, you saintly kiddies, this is what it's like in the exile! Temptation and disgrace! Corruption and self-mockery! Self-deprecation -- and self-defecation too! Whining, hysteria, compromise, confusion, disease! Yes, Naomi, I am soiled, oh, I am impure -- and also pretty fucking tired, my dear, of never being quite good enough for The Chosen People!
Good point. Roth’s novel, as I recall, has flashes of satirical brilliance. It could win an obscenity case with a “redeeming social value” defense. So comparing Dave to Alexander Portnoy is unfair to Alexander, who unlike Dave is not an entirely worthless wanker.
I had a wonderful high school librarian who had a shelf full of “banned books” in her office that she would lend to students deemed sufficiently mature to handle them. I managed to wheedle my way into being the first student allowed to borrow Portnoy’s Complaint. I demonstrated my maturity by reading the grossest parts aloud to my lunch room table mates.
This “Portnoy’s complaint” video is even more disgusting than the novel.
Surely there are sentiments here with which we can concur, though you and I with our goyische reserve doubtless would have employed fewer exclamation points.Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Wokechoke, @Etruscan Film Star
"Mr. Portnoy," she said, raising her knapsack from the floor, "you are nothing but a self-hating Jew.""Ah, but Naomi, maybe that's the best kind.""Coward.""Tomboy." "Shlemiel!"And made for the door. Only I leaped from behind, and with a flying tackle brought this big red-headed didactic dish down with me onto the floor. I'll show her who's a shlemiel! And baby! And if have VD? Fine! Terrific! All the better! Let her carry it secretly back in her bloodstream to the mountains! Let it spread forth from her unto all those brave and virtuous Jewish boys and girls! A dose of clap will do them all good!This is what's it's like in the Diaspora, you saintly kiddies, this is what it's like in the exile! Temptation and disgrace! Corruption and self-mockery! Self-deprecation -- and self-defecation too! Whining, hysteria, compromise, confusion, disease! Yes, Naomi, I am soiled, oh, I am impure -- and also pretty fucking tired, my dear, of never being quite good enough for The Chosen People!
https://twitter.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/1920322039056838970
"I just got a copy of Ye’s new song Heil Hitler
What are your thoughts?"
In the 1980s I did my MA thesis on Philip K. Dick, whose life was transformed by a flash of pink light from VALIS (Vast Active Living Intelligence System). So Jack Sarfatti’s unique blend of speculative physics and weird phone calls from UFOs doesn’t faze me. If I couldn’t handle offbeat people, I wouldn’t hang around websites like this ; – )
because nukes! don’t exist
IMO “nukes don’t exist” is exactly the same kind of denial propaganda as Flat Earth used to discredit fake moon landings.
If a conspiracy researcher asserts “we didn’t land on the moon”, that Apollo was faked, then the Cass Sunstein disinfo specialist attaches “flat earth” conspiracy to the “fake moon landing” conspiracy – in a vain attempt to discredit the fake moon landing theory.
That’s One Small Step For Man, One Giant Leap For….
https://odysee.com/@ARGONAUT:d/VID_20230104_080105_931:f
Likewise, since I am asserting that Israel has a HUGE nuclear arsenal and is using these nukes on a regular basis, the Israeli Unit 8200 disinformation trolls must try to discredit my assertion any way they can. So, the first and most obvious way to discredit what I am saying is to attack my thesis with “nukes don’t exist” agitprop.
Cass Sunstein – The Fascist Information Czar Behind Current U.S. Mass Propaganda and Censorship
In recent years it has be come quite obvious that the US government and Deep State, in collaboration with mainstream media outlets and a number of corporate/Internet entities, are now blanketing the American people with blatantly deceptive propaganda and a vastly coordinated online censorship and information control agenda.
How do we know the earth is not flat or that nukes do exist? Easy. There are hundreds of scientific methods and logic proofs to know that earth is a sphere. For one thing, air and naval navigation over the ocean requires using spherical coordinates, every single day the USNavy and USAF use navigation math based on earth is a sphere.
https://www.flightpaths.com/why-are-flight-paths-curved
What about nukes? Real or not? Well, first of all nuclear power is used for making electricity. Huge nuclear power plants supply megawatts of power. So nuclear fission must be real. Nuclear power plants are designed to keep the fissionable material from running away, using control rods – thus it is easy to understand that a bomb could be built. Then we have the post WW2 nuclear bomb tests before digital film. How could they have faked that footage? Impossible.
https://www.youtube.com/@Atomic_Tests_Channel
Why is Israel’s nuclear bomb program being kept secret? Because the United States has signed the NNPT, and if admitted, it would be illegal to give Israel any money. Since Israel uses nukes all the time, to blow up targets in Syria, Beirut, etc., they would like to maintain plausible deniability. Plus we have photo evidence that Israel possesses USA made W-54 warheads, another huge crime.
Gee, I wondered where Israel got these nuclear cores!

The reason Israel doesn’t nuke Gaza is because the Israelis intend on possessing the land and they don’t want it full of radiation, plus the fact since Gaza is inside of Israel, they would be nuking themselves – the precious chosen ones would be sucking down radioactive dust.
Anyways, Israel’s nuclear bomb program exposure is a Pandora’s Box that criminal politicians do not want opened. Thus “no nukes” is nothing more than disinfo trolling, nukes do exist.
You don’t like Greta’s plan to permanently sequester Zionist carbon underground?!
Marx’s line about history repeating tragedy as farce seems apropos here. The purge of anti-WW2 leaders was a national tragedy that is still playing out amidst the ongoing Zionist controlled demolition of America; whereas McCarthy’s drunken attempt at payback became a national joke, and came too late to repair the damage—like Trump’s current attempt to restore the US manufacturing sector that was offshored in the 1990s. Both McCarthy’s and Trump’s movements amount to hopeless, farcical, too-little-too-late payback attempts led by total buffoons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=we
In Orthodox Christianity, suffering is viewed not as a negative experience to be avoided, but as a potential path toward spiritual growth and union with God. Saints, while experiencing the same human suffering as others, often endured great trials and tribulations, often associated with their faith. This suffering, when endured with faith and love, is seen as a means of purification and a way to more closely emulate the suffering of Christ.
Here's a more detailed look at the role of suffering in the lives of Orthodox saints:
1. Suffering as a Path to Spiritual Growth:
Purification:
Orthodox theology suggests that suffering can help purify the soul and remove the negative effects of sin, allowing individuals to become more receptive to God's grace.
Closer to Christ:
By identifying with Christ's suffering, individuals can deepen their understanding of His love and sacrifice, leading to greater union with Him.
Love and Compassion:
Suffering can cultivate compassion for others, especially those who are also suffering, and strengthen one's love for God.
2. Types of Suffering Endured by Saints:
Persecution:
Many Orthodox saints were persecuted for their faith, facing imprisonment, torture, and even death.
Physical Illness:
Some saints, like Elder Porphyrios, endured severe physical illnesses and even prayed to have cancer to join others in their suffering.
Spiritual Struggles:
Saints also experienced internal struggles with doubt, temptation, and the effects of sin.
Disappointment and Rejection:
Like all humans, saints also experienced personal disappointments, rejection, and criticism from others.
3. Examples of Saints and Their Suffering:
St. Peter:
The Apostle Peter endured suffering and persecution, including imprisonment and execution, for his faith in Christ.
St. Isaac of Syria:
Known for his deep love and compassion for all people, even those who were sinners, St. Isaac experienced great sorrow for the suffering of others.
Saint Basil of Ostrog:
His suffering from disease and confinement, endured with great patience and joy, is celebrated as an example of how to endure suffering for the sake of Christ.
4. Orthodox View on Suffering:
Not Punishment:
Orthodox theology does not see suffering as a punishment from God, but as a potential tool for spiritual growth and a way to participate in Christ's redemptive work.
Joy in Suffering:
While suffering can be painful, Orthodox believers are encouraged to find joy in it, knowing that it can lead to greater union with God and the saints.
Redemptive Suffering:
The concept of redemptive suffering is central to Orthodox theology, as it emphasizes the idea that suffering can be used to atone for sins and contribute to the salvation of others.
In conclusion, the suffering of Orthodox saints is not seen as a weakness or a reason for despair, but as a powerful force for spiritual growth and a means of uniting oneself more closely with God and His suffering Son, Jesus Christ.
Israel is the jewel wasp. America is the hijacked cockroach.Replies: @Kevin Barrett
Fundamentally, Western imperialism serves to create outposts of the Zionist regime in the region.
I largely agree, but chose not to pick a fight with an otherwise excellent co-commentator.
Kissinger the “Jewish peacemaker,” LOL.
Once could cite Christian peacemakers from Jesus to Tolstoy to Dr. King, Indian peacemakers like Gandhi, Muslim peacemakers like Bacha Khan…and the Jewish example is…KISSINGER!
The antisemites rest their case.
I admire Tony Hall’s courage. He doesn’t back down, calls it the way he sees it, and was subjected to one of the craziest academic lynchings in history for having those qualities, proving once again that “no good deed goes unpunished.”
But I am disappointed by his drift away from his earlier brand of Canadian patriotism. Throughout most of Tony’s career he labored to contribute to a national narrative that emphasized Canada’s differences from the US, holding that Canada was less genocidal in its treatment of natives due to its incorporation into a multicultural empire (as opposed to the US Americans who broke away to form a genocidally racist republic). Agree or disagree – and it isn’t my narrative anyway – that was an interesting project.
Alberta separatism driven by big oil and gas interests pushing the most absurdly and transparently fallacious non-arguments-just-soundbites against climate change is a lot less interesting. (I don’t claim to know the truth about the scientific debate, but I know idiotic non-arguments-just-soundbites when I hear them.)
Johnson is Chair of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations tasked with “investigating all aspects of crime and lawlessness within the United States which have an impact upon or affect the national health, welfare and safety.” He doesn’t need Thune’s permission to investigate WTC-7 and the 9/11 demolitions.
Political liberalism holds freedom as its highest value and its only transcendent value. All other goods must be subordinate to it. That’s untenable and paradoxically leads to tyranny, as Peter Simpson shows in his book Political Illiberalism. Liberalism’s inherent shortcomings make it weaponizable, as for example when USAID targets nations for LGBTQ indoctrination.
Jews—tribalists whose authoritarian elite disguises itself as the abusive patriarch “Yahweh”—are the least liberal people on Earth. But they inflict a perverted brand of liberalism on competing tribes in order to destroy their traditions and especially their family structures.
The reason you learned about Holocaust skepticism from your Muslim students is that Jews haven’t succeeded in destroying Muslim traditions and family structures, and generally enslaving Muslim minds, to the extent they have succeeded in their war on the Christian West.
Koran is fully kiked – Islam is another Yidd sword...; pluralism + liberalism = Kike's rule.
... inflict a perverted brand of liberalism on competing tribes in order to destroy their traditions and especially their family structures.
...
...haven’t succeeded in destroying Muslim traditions and family structures, and generally enslaving Muslim minds,...
I agree, but am not sure that Liberalism as a political philosophy can really hold anything as a 'transcendent value'. Subscribing to the line that politics is downstream of culture, I would assert that Liberalism followed the path of the dominant cultural philosophy which abandoned any recognition of transcendence, instead viewing the world in strictly material terms.
Political liberalism holds freedom as its highest value
Trump is totally transactional and narcissistic. He doesn’t care about Israel or anything else except himself. He just plays the game, and the people with wealth and power dictate which strategies are potentially winning ones. In this case, replacing Netanyahu with “an even more fanatical Zionist” (i.e. Smotrich or Ben-Gvir) would be a losing strategy for Israel, so most of the Jewish oligarchs who rule the West wouldn’t support it. They would rather replace Bibi with a more rational Zionist who could cut the losses inflicted by Bibi and the extremists and attempt to restore Zionism’s long-term viability.
It's true that Trump is a narcissist, but saying that he is "transactional" is a misreading of Trump. I would say that being merely "transactional" is almost impossible for a narcissist because their self-image takes precedence over anything else. A real "transactional" person is just your standard Republican politician, more like Lindsey Graham. This type of person is almost the opposite of a narcissist. They have very little ego, and self-image is not a motivating factor for them in anything they do. They are more like empty vessels that special interests pour their desires into. It's Trump's narcissism that precludes him from being this type of person. He has his own ideas of how things should be and these are tied into his self-image as a genius and the "chosen one" (his own words), and there is no transaction that can break him from these ideas.
Trump is totally transactional and narcissistic. He doesn’t care about Israel or anything else except himself.
As I mentioned in the article, Netanyahu has a lot of enemies in Israel, including the majority of Israeli intel and the newly-fired Shit Bet chief Ronan Bar, and among Jewish oligarchs in the West. They all think he’s very bad for Israel and the Jews. And of course all non-Zionists everywhere despise him. “Terminating Bibi’s command” is not a pipe dream, it’s a real possibility. Trump wouldn’t be the only decider, but he could play a role.
I agree, and since Bibi is a constant pain in the ass, the empire could at any time, use it's muscle to remove the problem. Especially since Khazar thug Nutjobyahu has threatened Trump with assassination - little covered story that showed up on message boards was this story:
“Terminating Bibi’s command” is not a pipe dream, it’s a real possibility.
When Israel assassinated JFK, Amerika did nothing.
https://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-News/Atlanta-paper-owner-quits-over-Obama-hit-article
Atlanta paper owner quits over Obama hit article
Andrew Adler, publisher of 'Atlanta Jewish Times' had suggested Netanyahu deploy Mossad agents to assassinate US president.
JANUARY 23, 2012 21:42
The owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times has resigned and is seeking a buyer in the wake of a column he wrote speculating that Israel would consider assassinating US President Barack Obama.
After his first meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996, Bill Clinton vented his fury before his staff about his visitor’s apparent presumptions about the balance of power in the bilateral relationship. “Who the f**k does he think he is?,” Clinton reportedly bellowed. “Who’s the f**king superpower here?” Twenty-seven years later, another American president should be asking himself the same question about the very same Bibi Netanyahu and the country he leads.
Biden is president of the United States, still the most powerful country in the world by almost every measure and a country without whose support Israel has no future. A firm public demand to cease and desist immediately would have enormous domestic political repercussions in Israel — far less in the United States. Biden would not have to publicly threaten to cut off weapons deliveries; a few words delivered in private to Netanyahu and a few members of his war cabinet would probably suffice.
Most of Netanyahu's government would desert him. Even the most hawkish of the Israel Defense Forces’ leadership would not want to test an American president’s resolve.
Zionist Speculation and propaganda. Any intelligent person with an average IQ would be very surprised if Iran has one location to store solid fuel for its ballistic missiles in Bandar Abbas. The Port is no way near any Iranian missiles location that remain highly secret.
I am hoping and praying for Algeria to drop the Sahara thing, make up with Morocco, open the borders (which will be a huge economic plus here in Eastern Morocco) and take part of the credit when Morocco reverses course on Israhell. All that is definitely coming – there is no way the two governments can keep defying logic and popular sentiment forever – but who knows how long it will take.
Hey USS Truman, don’t let the door to the Red Sea hit you on the way out.
Houthis rule! They are the only government on Earth abiding by R2P and international law. I have always been skeptical about world government, but would support one if the Houthis were in charge. They have shown a willingness to do what’s right, not just what’s in their own selfish interests, which means they, unlike the competition, are fit to justly administer the world. Abdul-Malik al-Houthi for World President!
US aircraft carrier to leave after intense Yemeni strikes: Report
The [Yemeni Ministry of Defense] source stated, "We do not rule out that the Truman was directly hit in our recent operations, and we expect it to depart the theater of operations at any moment."
Thanks for the correction. I read a bunch of NYT articles on Francis’s death and funeral, including the main obit discussed in my article, and found no reference to Gaza. Apparently they quarantined the topic into this stand-alone article, which naturally doesn’t mention his call for a genocide investigation.
McCarthy attacked a lot of Jews. For example, he publicly accused Albert Einstein of "abusing his citizenship" with his political activism.
...but settled for McCarthy 1950 to go full anti communist by attacking only gentile WASP commies and drawing attention away from jewish communists that hitherto had all the attention from the feds and media. It succeeded, but McCarthy was stupid for having Roy Cohn...
Citizen Cohn is quite good, also has some details on his corrupt parents (father a crooked judge, mother hiding the proceeds of father’s crime then pretending to be broke to avoid asset seizures).
It is too affectionate in treating its subject and his parents, but to a clear-thinking reader, it is very damning.
Roy Cohn, who poured gasoline on the fire of McCarthy’s recklessness, was also Donald Trump’s mentor, teaching his protégé chutzpah and reckless disregard for truth. If some day Trump crashes and burns and becomes for today’s America First movement what McCarthy was for anticommunism, Cohn will deserve some of the credit for that, too.
“Several Presidents have said Jews run the government.” https://twitter.com/davincentjames/status/1916530408570696150 Last quote, from Nixon tapes: “Their parents are gold traders from Eastern Europe. They come here to Jew York City and they buy things. And one of the things they buy is the New York Times.”
Already in 1908, just a generation after the surge of immigration from Eastern Europe into the US began, the Russian Jew Zangwill -- of British nationality, and an associate of Theodor Herzl -- was propagandizing Americans about a cultural 'melting pot' which proved to be accurate for every ethnicity except, of course, his own. Jews don't assimilate.
The exact term "melting pot" came into general usage in the United States after it was used as a metaphor describing a fusion or mixture of nationalities, cultures and ethnicities in Israel Zangwill's 1908 play of the same name. -- Wikipedia
No divisions, but his words had enough weight that the Times and the rest of the MSM felt it necessary to censor them.
Because the Jews have always sold the peasants booze to dumb them down and distract them while their pockets are being picked?
If the Muslims manage to dry you out maybe you’ll sober up and do a reverse Cromwell ; – )
Thank you, I hadn’t realized that Oliver earned his Ph.D. in critical media studies around the same time that I was an undergraduate in the journalism program at UW-Madison studying similar things with John McNelly and Wilmot Ragsdale. The world needs more critical media studies! Warning: Studying such things can alienate people from the dominant discourse and produce damnable heretics like Oliver and me.
Thank you for this trenchant and convincing critique of the downsides of Christianity, Laurent. To be fair, I think we should admit that there are positive sides as well. I agree with E. Michael Jones that Christianity with its doctrines of love and sublimation has contributed to civilizing people and producing great works of art, music, and mysticism. Also, I grew up in a white post-Protestant Midwestern American culture whose ethics in general, and work ethic in particular, derived from Christianity and were actually pretty impressive. You might say “well, all of this would be even better if Europeans had been pagan philosophers” but I disagree. Philosophy is an elitist pursuit, and non-philosophical popular paganism devolves into base worldliness and human sacrifice.
By the way, Islam corrects the Yahwist defects of its predecessors by viewing God as fully universal (non-tribal) and non-anthropomorphic. It strikes perfect balances between reason-revelation and immanence-transcendence, and eschews mystifications like the Trinity and the bureaucratic priesthoods that maintain them. In short, Monotheism 1.3 is the version most compatible with the views of philosophers and mystics from all traditions.
Sterling Harwood might consider adding TWA 800 to the list…But various anomalies following the aircraft’s destruction, as well as behavior of certain investigators, suggest something was covered up.
Actually, you might want to take a look at my article from almost a decade ago. I think it’s pretty clear what actually happened:
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-destruction-of-twa-flight-800/
Apparently Sen. Johnson saw Weldon’s interview with Tucker Carlson, and has been in touch with Weldon and is supporting his efforts to get an investigation of the Able Danger program (protecting the “hijacker” patsies) and the demolitions, starting with WTC-7.
That makes sense. Been following your work Mr. Barrett for 20 years or so. Thank you for everything you’ve done and continue to do!
Summarizing: due to a personal scheduling issue ('conflicting plans') that had nothing to do with the opposition to your fall 2006 teaching contract, you were not available to teach in the spring of 2007 -- the chancellor of the university said he was 'comfortable' with you continuing to teach there -- you expressed interest in returning to teach in the fall of 2007.So how were you 'witch-hunted out of the University of Wisconsin-Madison'? -- did you apply to teach in the fall of 2007? -- if so, what happened?Replies: @Kevin Barrett
With the end of the semester approaching, University of Wisconsin lecturer Kevin Barrett said he has opted not to apply to teach at UW next semester.Barrett said his decision has nothing do with the adversity that has recently surrounded his UW teaching career. Barrett's publicized views that the U.S. government orchestrated the events of Sept. 11, 2001, have caused statewide controversy about the lecturer and his methods since this summer.
That report is inaccurate. I actually did apply for the same position teaching Intro to Islam, and other positions, and was turned down. (I don’t recall for sure whether the next class was offered that spring, that summer, or the next fall.) Muhammad Umar Memon, a member of the hiring committee, said the committee was told in no uncertain terms that I must not be hired, even though I was the most qualified candidate based on experience and ratings from peers and students.
During subsequent years I also applied for many other positions at the University similar to the ones I had been applying for and almost always getting since 1995. My success rate getting those jobs dropped from 80%+ to zero.
I also applied for dozens of positions at other US universities, including an Islam-Humanities job at the University of Illinois funded by the same federal grant that funded the one for which I was blacklisted, according to Dean Howard Ross, at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. Despite being one of the most qualified people in the world for those two jobs (having taught Humanities, Islam, and Arabic at three universities) in both cases, the universities closed the positions and returned the money to the feds claiming they couldn’t find a suitable candidate!
Informally and off the record, everyone in academia I’ve discussed the situation with has always said “well, duh, of course you’re blacklisted! I mean, come on, Google yourself!”
Look, the fake ear wound, plus Trump being allowed to quickly expose himself to more potential bullets to get the signature photo, seals the deal: It was a PR stunt, not an actual assassination attempt. But it’s always possible that the PR stunt was piggybacked on a real plot that had been intercepted. If elements of the Deep State were plotting to kill Trump, what better way to ward them off than for pro-Trump Deep Staters to turn that plot into a PR triumph that riled up Trump’s base and made future attempts unadvisable? (And, incidentally, boosted Trump’s election chances.)
This scenario would also explain Trump’s willingness to participate in the deception.
I agree that Johnson doesn’t necessarily want to go after the dancing Israelis. He’s basically a good-natured conservative Midwestern businessman who’s emotionally wired to support his tribe (the American one) and not rock the boat.
But as America’s top academic Bin Laden expert, Bruce Lawrence, told me on the radio, the obstacle preventing Establishment people from “going there” is simple: If Bin Laden didn’t do 9/11, then who did? If Johnson’s investigation exposes the demolitions, everyone will know that someone with extraordinary access to both the WTC and advanced demolition technology did it. Now who could that be? And who would have a motive to send the American military after Israel’s enemies, and to inundate the US and the world with pro-Israel anti-Islam propaganda? Gee, I wonder. https://bollyn.com/public/Solving_9-11_-_The_Deception_That_Changed_The_World.pdf
Liberalism begins by trying to protect everyone’s freedom to pursue their many different visions of the good. The problem is that to various extents, many people’s vision of the good involves dominating and exploiting others, and a few ruthless, cunning, and/or sadistic people are extremely proficient in pursuing that “good.” Before long the main “freedom” that liberalism protects is the freedom of small minority of rich and powerful people to dominate, exploit, and torment others…that is, freedom as viewed by the Marquis de Sade or the Citizens United ruling. That’s pretty much where we are now.
‘In 2019, (the Pope) declared that the “diversity of religions” was “willed by God,” a statement that jarred traditionalists who view Christianity as Europe’s bulwark against Islam.’
You, and/or the traditionalists, are getting this completely backwards. The single biggest reason for Christianity’s decline, even more important than the incoherence of its trinitarian doctrine and lapses into imagining an anthropomorophic deity, is its traditional rejection of the plain and obvious reality that the diversity of religions obviously IS willed by God. Communications technology has made it impossible to ignore the fact that whatever tribal religion we were born into is just one among many, quite a few of which are as plausible and appealing, at least in some respects, as our own. Only boneheaded prejudice—ultimately a rejection of the Gods’-eye view and a lapse into small-minded narcissistic/satanic egotism, not to mention obscurantism—can lead people to deny the obvious and cling desperately to a “my way or the highway” approach to religion.
Islam, with its long-standing doctrine of religious pluralism (thousands of prophets have come to thousands of peoples, and diversity is a blessing from God) persists with unmatched intensity in today’s world in part because that doctrine of pluralism is compatible with an age blessed by extensive travel and highly-developed communications technology.
Francis’s 2019 declaration represents an attempt to save Christianity from a boneheaded narcissistic obscurantism that worked fine back when nobody really knew their neighbors.
-brutal war against undefended populations, rape, pillaging, blasphemy, genocide, perversity, child-marriage, theft, corruption and exploitation of working Christian peoples by excessive taxation is the Barrett answer to his moral ignorance.
Islam, with its long-standing doctrine of
Like in 99% Islamic Morocco? Where it is illegal for Muslims to convert to Christianity. Where Arabic bibles are confiscated. Where 1/2 million Christian’s fled to avoid forced conversion/persecution. Where the few remaining Christians are treated as second class citizens. Where the state religion is Islam. Where only one Islamic denomination is acceptable (too bad for the Shias).
Islam, with its long-standing doctrine of religious pluralism.
Islam, the one that beheads you for being an apostate? Or is there some other kind of which I am unaware?Replies: @anonymous
Islam, with its long-standing doctrine of religious pluralism
wow, 'diversity' isn't just the fount of our strength, but a 'blessing from God' !How to explain that to the people of Gaza, that what's happening to them is a 'blessing from God'.Or Syria today, where Christians and Muslims are holding hands with Jews in Israel, in a kumbaya celebration of diversity and multiculturalism.In fact, as you well know Kevin, the Middle East has historically been a region of great harmony, going back centuries, with the three Abrahamic religions and the diverse ethnicities always uplifting each other with mutual love and respect and limitless tolerance. Just like today in Gaza, or very recently in Iraq and Libya and Lebanon and elsewhere, where we can all appreciate the great blessings and bountiful gifts of diversity!When Hutu tribes, hack the limbs off of Tutsi children, it is God's way of showing them His blessings of diversity, huh Kevin. If they were all Hutus, or all Tutsis', they'd have no reason or rationale for hacking the rival tribe to death, just like the love and respect for each other that the American 'Indians' were known for. A paradise of diversity, when Mexicans and Apaches and Comanches were all engaged in the kind of diversity party that now Gaza and Syria and Ukraine, are all enjoying! Praise god for his eternal "blessings"and as for the pedophile pope, Rot in Hell.The Catholics are a good people, some of the best. But the Vatican is a den of pedophile snakes, and like all the legacy institutions and churches of the dying West, they've been (((corrupted))) into ZOG's army of rats. The first thing I'd change, is to allow priests to have wives. When the only people who can become priests, are the men who've sworn off women, (which will obviously include more than its share of homos), then you've tainted the supply of good men, down to a tiny minority. When the best of the Catholic Bishops, Richard Williamson, [RIP] was excommunicated for telling the truth, it showed just how rotten and corrupt and sinister the Vatican actually was/is.To save the Church, I think they have to burn down the Vatican, (figuratively, of course), and rout out the pedophiles and Zionist, wall-licking whores.But that ain't going to happen, so I would just walk away from that 'church', and keep your relationship with God a personal one, or a local church, far removed from the pedophile, zio-scum in the Vatican.
diversity is a blessing from God
The neocons may be right that liberalism is a stage set and the real action transpires behind the scenes. Now, as Frank Zappa predicted, they’re tearing down the stage set: “The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it’s profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.”
Ron Unz has already opined on the Butler spectacle. As I recall, he found it suspicious, weighed the two most obvious conspiracy scenarios (an organized professional assassination attempt that failed vs. a pro-Trump PR spectacle) and argued that there wasn’t enough evidence to support either conspiracy theory. Needless to say, I think he got this one wrong.
It looks to me like Trump has already discovered who was behind the two assassination attempts we know about and that's why he's being especially obstreperous with China on trade. I see now he's said that he wants to deal only with Xi when the negotiations get started.
Needless to say, I think he got this one wrong.
If RFK is playing 4D chess, he has nerves of steel—and a very strong stomach, since he hangs around with Shmuley without vomiting.
More likely he’s suffering from PTSD-enhanced Stockholm syndrome.
The mindless emotional reaction “Trump wouldn’t go along with a murder,” which prevents most Americans from seeing the plain obvious reality in front of their eyes, answers the question of why such a plot would include at least one scripted death.
Illegal/immoral covert operations are always run on a need-to-know basis. Trump didn’t need to know in advance that someone would die, therefore he didn’t know. Once it’s a done deal, a narcissistic borderline-sociopath like Trump obviously won’t object too strongly and thereby endanger himself and his family. (And don’t forget that the organizers have video of Trump rehearsing.)
Of course it’s always possible that “nobody died” as the Jim Fetzer school of thought loves to claim regarding Sandy Hook, Boston, Manchester, etc. I disagree with Fetzer and consider such claims unproven. I haven’t seen any evidence that “nobody died in Butler,” but if your Trump-worship requires you to believe something like that, you’d be better off with that somewhat dubious belief than with the obviously false belief that Trump was shot in the ear.
The pro wrestling metaphor is apt, Ron. But it’s also applicable to the obviously fake “Trump shooting” in Butler on July 13, during which Trump popped a WWF-style blood capsule and smeared fake blood across his face like war paint as he shook his fist for the scripted photo op in front of the flag. Multiple lines of evidence prove this, including:
*The Secret Service let Trump jump up and shake his fist for the photo op, which no minimum wage bodyguard, much less the SS, would ever do, given that Trump would have been exposing himself to more bullets.
*There is no convincing evidence that Trump’s ear was struck by a high-velocity bullet, or even wounded in any way, and abundant evidence that it was not (namely the photos taken two weeks later when he took off the bandage).
*The “miracle” photograph of the bullet zipping past Trump is highly improbable, to way the least. What is highly probable is that in a stunt like this “proof” would be manufactured that a bullet whizzed somewhere near Trump, to refute those of us who have noticed that no bullets came anywhere near Trump.
*Abundant evidence shows that Crooks, far from being a lucky loner, was obviously a patsy. The bullets that killed Corey Comperatore and wounded David Dutch came from the building behind Crooks, and from that vantage point no bullets could have endangered Trump. See: https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_john-hankey-discusses-his-new-film-on-fake-trump-shooting-in-butler/
Two days after the fake shooting, the headline speaker at the Republican convention in Milwaukee, Hulk Hogan, went way over the top covertly congratulating Trump on his performance in Butler. That “revelation of the method” broke the chutzpah meter. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbzNiwRz4gU
Those of us who understood Butler knew, by mid-July 2024, that Trump would be inserted in the White House to be “Bibi’s butler.” We knew Trump was a fool run by the Jewish-Zionist oligarchs and their crime syndicate.
How did you miss all this? Maybe you should have watched more pro wrestling when you were a kid ; – )
Kucinich’s statement “Israel does not have a stronger supporter than Robert F. Kennedy Jr.” is a classic example of politician-speak. Successful politicians have to gain agreement, or at least avoid serious disagreement, from an extremely diverse constituency. So they say things that can be interpreted one way by partisans of X, and another way by anti-Xers.
In this case, Kucinich doesn’t want to seriously offend his friend RFK Jr., with whom he strongly disagrees about Palestine. So he strings together words that won’t offend his friend. But what they actually mean is “genocide doesn’t have a stronger supporter than RFK Jr.”
Only truth jihadis like me say such things. Politicians like Kucinich find euphemisms.
Because it really would be. Just as supporting the liberation of Constantinople would, quite fairly, be seen as anti-Turkish. Nutty "free Palestine" types, who supposedly care deeply about Palestinian welfare, only hurt their own cause with this maximalist stance. It is hardly a wonder why Jews are so wary of the Palestinian "peace" movement which, if it had its way, would only replace one set of oppressors with another.Replies: @Jim H, @Kevin Barrett, @muh muh, @Colin Wright
NEVER support the full liberation of Palestine (that would be antisemitic)
Today’s emerging multipolar world obviously isn’t going to try to right wrongs from 500 years ago, but it will deliver the coup de grace to 20th-century Western settler colonialism and its most hideous manifestation, the Yahwist genocide of the Holy Land.
At least you admit it was a wrong. Not sure how your brothers in faith will feel about that.
Today’s emerging multipolar world obviously isn’t going to try to right wrongs from 500 years ago
Lol, okay. I'll believe that when I see your emerging multipolar army storming the battlements.
but it will deliver the coup de grace to 20th-century Western settler colonialism and its most hideous manifestation, the Yahwist genocide of the Holy Land.
All these bitter complaints by many commenters against various views of Jeffrey Sachs seem rather ridiculous to me.
Yes, as much as I like Sachs’s stances on Russia-Ukraine, China, and the genocide in Palestine and his persona, he’s still got that particular slant.
You’re right, Ron, that some of these anti-Sachs comments are silly. I’m not exactly shocked that he worries about global warming or seeks enhanced global cooperation through the UN, much less that he’s from a Jewish background.
But I am shocked that Sach’s prescription for reforming the UN is to promote genocidal Hindufascist India to the Security Council. The BJP’s goal, since its founding, has been to murder/expel all non-Hindus from the Indian subcontinent. That would be the biggest genocide in history by many orders of magnitude. And it’s already underway: India’s genocidal occupation of Kashmir rivals the Zionist occupation of Palestine in brutality and flagrant violation of international law. Lauding such a grossly criminal government for its supposed diplomatic triumphs is beyond insane. And yes, China (and the rest of the world) would have to be crazy to let them anywhere near the Security Council.
So as much as I admire Sachs’ recent turn towards truth, I have to wonder what he was smoking when he wrote this one.
.
But I am shocked that Sach’s prescription for reforming the UN is to promote genocidal Hindufascist India to the Security Council. The BJP’s goal, since its founding, has been to murder/expel all non-Hindus from the Indian subcontinent....So as much as I admire Sachs’ recent turn towards truth, I have to wonder what he was smoking when he wrote this one
I largely agree with your critique of Protestantism, though I find liberal Protestantism more intellectually advanced than most varieties of Catholicism due to the larger scope for intellectual freedom (John Cobb and David Ray Griffin being light-years ahead of most Catholics imho).
I do appreciate Catholic and Orthodox mysticism and engagement of the heart. We need more people like Thomas Merton and Tikhon Shevkunov.
This excellent article brought back memories of the pro-Palestine movement at the University of Wisconsin-Madison circa 1995-2004, when I was teaching and finishing my Arabic Ph.D.
My first impression was “isn’t it great how many left-wing Jews are involved in this.” But the more I learned, the more obvious it became that while there were a few honest, open-minded, universalist pro-Palestine Jews, most Jewish involvement aimed at tribally dominating and “containing” the movement, and policing the Arab and Muslim students.
The Jewish leftists “supporting Palestine” imposed their Overton Window with strict rules: NEVER talk about Jewish power or even the Lobby. ALWAYS insist that the American imperialist dog wags the Jewish-Zionist tail, à la Chomsky. NEVER support the full liberation of Palestine (that would be antisemitic), instead support Labor Zionism. NEVER entertain “conspiracy theories” because they are all antisemitic. And above all, never, EVER appeal to American conservatives and normies—always be as weirdly extreme-left as possible, so as to alienate rather than attract normal American goys.
When I singlehandedly launched the 9/11 truth movement at UW-Madison in 2004, and attracted closet support from the management of The Capital Times newspaper and later WISC-TV (the most influential local station), the “left-wing pro-Palestine Jews” were horrified. Allen Ruff, then manager of the left-wing Rainbow Bookstore, at first refused to stock David Ray Griffin’s The New Pearl Harbor, and later, when it became a bestseller and couldn’t be ignored, would always try to argue customers out of buying it. When I introduced Griffin at his breakthrough C-Span talk at the University in April 2005, Ruff stalked angrily to the podium just before I introduced Griffin and snarled “We’re keeping a file on you!” Too bad that didn’t make the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLEuYAVKNrk
Video Link
Because it really would be. Just as supporting the liberation of Constantinople would, quite fairly, be seen as anti-Turkish. Nutty "free Palestine" types, who supposedly care deeply about Palestinian welfare, only hurt their own cause with this maximalist stance. It is hardly a wonder why Jews are so wary of the Palestinian "peace" movement which, if it had its way, would only replace one set of oppressors with another.Replies: @Jim H, @Kevin Barrett, @muh muh, @Colin Wright
NEVER support the full liberation of Palestine (that would be antisemitic)
While I don't attribute the same degree of conscious intent to it that you imply, the 'gatekeeper syndrome' is real.I used to post at Mondoweiss -- which is critical of Israel but an overwhelmingly Jewish crowd. Gentiles permitted -- if they are meek and regularly refer to the spiritual richness of Judaism, etc.So my honeymoon there came to an end when Greta Berlin was being unpersoned. I started insisting that what she had said wasn't strictly speaking 'antisemitic' but anti-Zionist -- which, of course, was the case. It was to do with applauding some claim about the Haavara Agreement or something -- doesn't matter.I was summarily banned -- and shortly afterwards I got an anonymous e-mail taunting me. 'Got you' -- or words to that effect. Everything to do with Israel is the sole property of Jews, in the end. They will decide what can and cannot be said.Thinking about it, it's interesting. I could post there -- for a while -- back then. That would have been back around 2012. Now? No way. I no longer reflexively see anti-semitism as a bad thing. If I did show up, my life expectancy would be about six posts, not six months.Replies: @ariadna
'...The Jewish leftists “supporting Palestine” imposed their Overton Window with strict rules: NEVER talk about Jewish power or even the Lobby...'
Huh? Why is that so strange? Its basic marketing, you adjust your sales pitch to the audience. There are no conservatives in the american university system. I'll give you that there may be people who think of themselves as conservatives, but they are not.
And above all, never, EVER appeal to American conservatives and normies—always be as weirdly extreme-left as possible, so as to alienate rather than attract normal American goys.