After having been fired a number of times “it isn’t working out”, “we have no work for you” etc. etc. I decided that I didn’t want to be Joe employee for my last working years until retirement.

I had often been complimented on my work, “doing for a dollar what anyone else can do for ten”, and “elegant solutions”…

I got the appropriate license and E&O insurance, and hung out my shingle. And never looked back!

The tax breaks for a sole proprietorship working from a private residence can be quite worthwhile.

Best of all, every client was happy to see me and paid my bill without question. (Except my very first client who tried to stiff me. Small claims court was my friend.)

It takes discipline and good budgeting skills to pull this off but I really enjoyed this part of my career until I retired at the age of 70. HdC

Just to clarify your assertion: It was Britain and France that declared war on Germany…

Better yet, go to the CODOH website; much more civilized and no ad hominem attacks. HdC

Personally I cannot take anyone seriously who advocates, as does Hilberg, that the holocaust was organized without supporting documentation by means of a “German Mind Meld”, ie. a meeting of the minds.

Anyone with serious project management experience will appreciate the idiocy of such an assertion. HdC

“…Rather than quoting Hilberg directly — “meeting of the minds”…”

Methinks this quote succinctly sums up the issue of the Holocaust claims. Via transference I would say, since there are no forensic nor scientific facts to substantiate any such assertions of Holocaustiany.

Here is another gem, straight from the Canadian High Priest of Holocaustianity: “For 99% of what we know of the Holocaust, no proof exists.” Straight from the Toronto Globe and Mail I believe.

I wrote in the commentary section at that time that I would like to see the evidence for the remaining 1% but, as is usual in this type of debate, nothing was offered in response.

Correct me if I am wrong but, is not the central thesis of Hilberg’s tome exactly what its title proclaims?
Unless of course the book was meant as a work of fiction, in which case any title that captures the potential customer’s eye and interest would suffice.

All I’m querying is the allegation of the German “meeting of the minds”, which is used to “explain” the absence of documentary evidence to support the holocaustian’s assertions.

And where one may find neutral court-proven forensic or other scientific evidence to support same claims.

Seems easy to me, and all I get is verbosity ad infinitum yet nary a direct answer. Not really surprising considering that the Canadian high priest of holocaustianity, van Pelt, is quoted in one Toronto newspaper that “for 99% of what we know of the Holocaust no evidence exists”.

Try that argument in a non-partial court.

http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/article/742965--a-case-for-letting-nature-take-back-auschwitz

The forgoing URL worked a few years ago, but no longer. I even checked on the Toronto Star newspaper archive web site for the quotation but, alas, it was not forthcoming. Not surprising, really.

Van Pelt misspoke??? He is the Canadian high priest after all, and he wouldn’t even furnish the evidence for 1% of the “knowledge”.

As for the rest of the stuff, you would need to read the transcripts of the Zuendel trials in Toronto, and the subsequent changes that were made in later editions of Destruction of European Jews. The “meeting of the minds” is from that later edition.

This is the last of my comments on this topic unless someone can point me towards verified forensic or other scientific evidence. HdC

You’re running true to form… Several times now I have asked for verified forensic and other scientific evidence to support your assertions.

Since you are unable to do so you are forced to fall back onto the old stand-by so favoured by the holocaustians: Ad hominem attacks.

It would be so easy for you and your co-claimants to simply furnish the physical evidence to substantite your assertions.

But then, even your high priest of holocaustianity cannot supply such evidence in his tome of what? About 1700 pages of jumbled verbiosity with not a single, solitary, physical, verified fact in that mountain of wasted ink and paper.

“Ninety-nine per cent of what we know we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove . . . it has become part of our inherited knowledge.”

Try and take that into an impartial court as evidence of, say, a murder.

If you have a lawyer friend run this by him and see what he says.

reiner Tor, my apologies but my post #118 was meant for Andrew and his post #117.

What am I waiting for???

Simply the FREAKING forensic or other scientific evidence that backs up the claims of holocaustians, that’s what.

And since this is not forthcoming, I believe I’ve won that round.

Next question: 6 million bodies would form a row 100Km long when stacked 10 bodies wide and 10 bodies high and aligned end to end.

Please provide the evidence, acceptable to an impartial USA criminal court, of the supply of coal, coke, wood, or other energy source, to fully cremate 6 million human bodies.

There is so much wrong with your narrative that I am not going to bother, but will stick to the salient point here.

“…Not all were cremated and not all were disposed of in the same way…”

Fair enough. Would you care to estimate the percentage that was cremated, and the percentage that was not?

That last percentage, of course, raises the question as to what happened to all those corpses. Were they buried??? If so, were? Forensic evidence?

As to my qualifications, I’m a Professional Engineer, mechanical discipline, have earned my livelihood using numbers for over 40 years now. And no one ever came to grief or was sued because of my work.

Since you are wrong on all the specifics pertaining to the issue at hand, I am pleased to confirm that you are also wrong on my personal background as I have posted here.

Google and the internet must be used cautiouslyand intelligently, and many individuals fail in this regard.:-)).

hdc or haadeecee is my nom de guerre for non-PC discussions such as we have here, since in Canada it could get me into trouble, and in Germany a prison sentence. I may be simple in my thoughts but no one that knows me calls me stupid.

Sorry to disappoint you but I have no instagram account nor have I ever posted any photos using hdc or similar.

On the issue at hand, what kind of brain would think of shipping corpses from Auschwitz or similar, to the Ukraine??? Especially when the Germans were in retreat from there? Your assertions are getting a little bizarre, don’t you think?

You are right for once; I want to see forensic and/or other scientific evidence to substantiate the assertions you and other holocaustians are making practically every day. And I have absolutely no interest in debating this because either the evidence is there or it isn’t.

Based on your responses I conclude that there is no such evidence and ergo, no holocaust ie. no gassing and burning of the hallowed 6 million. Or is it 11 million? Its hard to keep track.

Can you do no better than proffing personal attacks? Admit it, you lost the debate, all your obfuscation notwithstanding.

If you have difficulties with definitions, wiki is your friend. To the best of my knowledge only expert testimony is considered a part of forensic evidence; consequently eye witness testimony is usually excluded. Especially if the witness is likely to benefit from his testimony. Sound familiar???

As a minimal standard of evidence one might consider that what was obtained / recorded during the Katyn Forest mass grave excavations, including all the witnesses present. The Serniki digs do not even meet that minimal standard. And today we can do much better.

All the questions I asked about Auschwitz as to proof and evidence, certainly applies to the digs at Serniki.

“…Thus, the standards of evidence are different…”

The STANDARDS are different??? Where do you get that hare-brained idea? Forensic evidence is forensic evidence!

Here are some specific questions regarding Serniki:

Who did the killing?
Who was killed?
Why were they killed?
Who gave the actual order for the killing?
From where did these orders originate in the NSDAP hierarchy?

That’ll do for a start.

Remember, verified forensic or other scientific evidence.

OK, you’ve written your opinion piece.

Where is the independently verified forensic and / or other scientific evidence? Notice that the latter is a continuous, but unfulfilled, request in many of my posts.

Well, I’ve bee wracking my brains to discover the relevancy of this mass grave with holocaustianity which is my primary interest of those times.

Granted that there were reprisal executions on all sides…

I’ve read the transcript of one of the Zuendel trials which occurred in the 1980’s in Toronto; my son brought it home from his school library. I was absolutely appalled at what passed for evidence on the part of the prosecutor, yet the jury still found Zuendel guilty. And there is no evidence that this has changed in any western country.

What I would like to see is the original forensic report issued by a certified pathologist. I’m afraid that an archeologist, no matter how many of his peers man the hallelujah chorus, does not qualify.

Apart from that I’ve been busy planning our late winter holiday “down south”, and I’ve begun a new project in my work shop.

As one sage would have it: “Extraordinary allegations require extraordinary proof.”

As stated earlier, my interest lies with holocaustianity, that is why I chimed in earlier in this thread.

It is you that tried to muddy the waters of discussion by introducing some “mass grave” in Ukraine. Agreed that 500 + bodies constitutes a mass grave but not in the context of holocaustianity. My reply would then be “OK, you found 500+ bodies, where are the remaining alleged 10,000,500 bodies or their remains? (6 mil. Jews plus 5 mil. Gentiles as alleged).

Back to our original contention: Where is the forensic evidence to support your allegations of 11 million gassed and cremated???????? hdc

As far as I know Germany has never declared war on Britain; Britain however declared war on Germany twice in the last century for economic and political reasons.

So who tried to destroy whom? And with what result? Hdc

Jilles:

A couple of points:

The yellow star with Jude imprinted was requested by Jewish Council in Germany, I believe.

After WWII the Danes allowed approx. 10,000 German children to starve to death. There is a newspaper story about this somewhere. HdC

If you cannot take the heat get out of the kitchen!
Ie. don’t declare war on Germany, bomb its citizens, and then whine and moan that those nasty Germans retaliated.
Mind you, typical British nonsense.

You might wish to read a book entitled Icebreaker written by a Soviet colonel whose name just escapes me.

Russian and German historians are in general agreement with the premise of this book that the Soviet Union had planned to invade Germany, and overrun all of Europe, beginning almost precisely one month after the Germans beat them to the punch.

Other books also deal with this issue.

As stated above, quit whining and moaning.

Have to disagree with you on this point, Jilles.
The Polish government was complicit in the murder of tens of thousands of German expatriates that lived in those areas that were “given” to Poland pursuant to the Diktat of Versailles.

It was these murders, and the incessant German/Polish border excursions that led Hitler to order the invasion of Poland. Hitler even appealed to the British and the French to prevail upon the the Poles to cease and desist in their actions but to no avail as these worthies actually wanted war.

The forgoing is well described in the diplomatic dispatches as listed in Witness to History.

No, I certainly do not think they were faked, because there were enough bodies and skeletons of German civilians at hand. Consider:

The incessant firebombing of German cities, practically all cities with populations of 50,000 or more, were destroyed. (from discussions with Bomber Harris and his minions)

Further, everything that moved on road or rails was bombed or machine gunned. (bragging by British and American bomber crews)

Thus there was an ample supply of German corpses to fill that bill.

But here is the REALLY beautiful part: An American pathologist examined over a thousand corpses and ruled that they practically all died of disease and/or malnutrition.

He did not find one corpse that had died of gassing, be it carbon monoxide or Zyklon B.

The corpses of those individuals poisoned by Zyklon B also exhibit a pinkish to reddish hue. This can be verified by perusing the appropriate textbook on pathology.

And your observation that “None of the witnesses report this” applies here, too. As a matter of fact, when describing the appearance of supposedly gassed individuals the witnesses invariably stated the colours to be bluish-green-grey, or some variant thereof. Go figure.

“Eyewitness testimony is worthless without supporting physical evidence.”

Please read my post #1832 again.

I believe I distinctly wrote: “…of SUPPOSEDLY gassed individuals…” (emphasis here only) in the second paragraph.

In the first paragraph I simply stated that individuals poisoned with Zyklon B would have a reddish hue as can be verified by perusing appropriate books on pathology. Nowhere did I state in this paragraph anything about German labour camps.

Very well and succinctly put. HdC

I disagree.

Scientific Truth is what can be reproduced by independent researchers.

For a long time I have lamented how a country with a such a system of PERCEIVED excellent schools -the Ivy League- has become such a political and judicial rat hole.

Thanks to the author for answering that question for me.

The next answer required is: What can be done about it? HdC

…”Alan Turing, the inventor of the programmable computer, “…

I don’t think so, neither does wiki.

Jilles, please search for Conrad Zuse and Z1 computer, the first programmable computer built in 1935 -1936. HdC

Do you conclude that, perhaps, your grandfathers, and the US as a whole, “gored the wrong pig ie. fought on the wrong side of WWI and WWII???

Methinks that if sufficient people are able to answer a resounding YES to the foregoing query, it would go a long way in their understanding of what is happening now politically: Bigger and bigger lies required to cover up the lies of yesterday, yesteryear, yesterdecade… HdC

Robert van Pelt is the Canadian High Priest of Holocaustianity and is on record having stated that for 99% of what we know of the Holocaust, no evidence exists. (Quoted from memory)

The forgoing statement appeared in the Toronto Daily Star some years ago. When I wrote a comment to the above requesting forensic or other scientific evidence for the remaining 1%, nary a peep from that worthy.

Rather than rely on the opinion on one obviously slanted in a certain direction, I would recommend that those interested read the transcripts of the Zuendel trials that were held in Toronto during the 1980’s. Zuendel was found guilty by a jury of his “peers” for publishing false news regarding the H, but both rulings were overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada at that time.

RvP is still busy propagating his “mistaken beliefs” with exhibits at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto.

Regret to have to admit that he is on the faculty of Architecture at my Alma Mater. HdC

“5. Nonsense. Interrogation techniques used by the US and its allies do not use torture.”

You are seriously mistaken to make a statement like that. HdC

Check wiki for the name Konrad Zuse to see who built the first programmable computer. He probably gave ol’ blue the start in computers after the war.

“… it is almost impossible for news consumers to discern the truth about the situation in Israel and Palestine. ..”

Well, one can simply conclude that the OPPOSITE of that what is proffed in the stories pertaining to the foregoing is much closer to the truth.

Doing this with every controversial news story would provide a much truer picture of things. HdC

Read your post down to: “… One of the first things he did after gaining power was confiscate all private firearms, …” and stopped, as this is a blatant falsehood as a modicum of Google research would disclose.

Falsehood in one, falsehood in all, is a very good and useful dictum to follow on the internet. HdC

Offhand I can think of three very good reasons:

1) To introduce new and non-diseased genes into their polluted gene pool.
2) To hide in plain sight. To this end rich American Jews would marry their daughters to British nobility.
3) To gain respectability with a new surname and title.

Good enough for you? HdC

Well, running it into the ground, anyways.
A modicum of observation would disclose that everything zionists touch in public life turns to shit.

Agree with your position.

My investment advisors (Two different investment houses) and I agreed on our investment MO which has withstood the test of time since the 1999/2000 panic. 2007/8 was pretty bad but I resisted the panic. Did well then too. Basically we buy stocks in businesses that have an impeccable record of paying dividends for more that 5 years.

Interestingly the annual returns from both advisors is quite similar each year.

Ask yourself: “Why would I invest in a business? To make money, of course!” Hence the emphasis on the dividend payout record.

Of course I understand that one can make a “killing” by speculating in “high flyers” but, the ones that make out like bandits are the ones with REAL and LEGAL insider information such as Wall Street bankers and members of parliament, congress, and senate. The average joe investor like myself may as well depend on lottery tickets for income than invest in one of the “flyers”.

I’ll let y’all know how this panic turns out for me on this forum. HdC

Read up in books written by whom??? The same interests that have inundated us with holocaust Greuelpropaganda ad infinitum? HdC

“Judea declares war on Germany” screamed international headlines in 1933. France and Britain, plus various hangers-on, declared war on Germany in 1939. German expatriates, caused by the Diktat of Versailles were murdered by the tens of thousands in Poland, with that governments permission.
And Germany is, and remains, the Bad Guy??? HdC

Please provide PHYSICAL evidence for your assertion of “sent to the ovens”, by which you probably mean homicidal gas chambers. FYI every city in the western world has these “ovens” aka crematoria.

35,000 or so murdered German expatriates (thanks to the diktat of Versailles) would disagree with you.
Fact is, Germany, previously the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nations, is / was the most peaceful country in Europe.
If you want to talk about warmongering, Britain takes the first prize in Europe. An essay on this was published some years ago in Chronicles, a Magazine of American Culture. The essay cited 2 American and 2 British studies to support this assertion.
Certainly between WW1 and WW2 Poland was a most bellicose country. Just read Polish newspapers of that period.

Socialism, specifically Nationalist Socialism as espoused by the NSDAP in Germany, worked very well indeed. Would it have been a long-term answer to today’s difficulty? No one knows for sure; however, both the capitalists and the communists thought that the ideas espoused, and successfully implemented in Germany, were a threat of sufficient magnitude to their own world view such that a major war was thought worthwhile: The German government of the day did improve the life of the working people significantly such the the communist and capitalist world view was made redundant.
Today we still have the Volkswagen and the Autobahn to remind us of the successes of that regime.
Couldn’t have that, could we? The idea of a better life for the working man just had to be destroyed.
Just look at the effort it took for 5 years to defeat that idea in a small European country with very few natural resources of its own. What a country! What a People! HdC

Thank you, sir, for your essay on banking in Canada. As a Canadian I am most interested in this information. Could you, perhaps, recommend a text or two, at university level, that digs into this at length? Thank you. HdC

Kopernikus was GERMAN as a modicum of research would disclose. He didn’t even speak Polish. But, because Poland has had so few scientists of any renown, they had to appropriate some.

The Chinese invented many things but treated them as curiosities and did not use/develop them for the benefit of its people. Whereas once Europeans reinvented an idea, that idea was developed for the benefit of all. That individual that makes his ideas available for broad public usage gets the credit.

Think of Edison and his lightbulb and Bell and his telephone. Neither invented their respective devices but are given the credit because they made it available for public use and enjoyment. HdC

To get the ball rolling, so to speak, I recommend a book entitled “The Pity of War” by Niall Ferguson. He was a student at Oxbridge when he wrote this tome. Ferguson is now a professor at Harvard, I think. Certainly at one of the (poisonous) Ivy League schools.

This book deals with the lead-up to WWI and the British involvement thereto. A great read. HdC

You are referring to mass production assembly plants such as those used for cars and consumer appliances.

Try heavy engineering and manufacturing, where every employee’s contribution or lack thereof directly affects the bottom line. Here reliability, ability, character, stickwithitness, etc. etc. definitely rise to the fore. Even the attitude brought to the job affects the quality work. HdC

“Judea Declares War on Germany” screamed international newspaper headlines in 1933.
Turn-around is a bitch; too bad so sad HdC

Glad you agree that Germany was perfectly within its rights to limit Jewish influences, influences that were highly detrimental to Germany’s well-being.
I must wonder where you get your information regarding German politics during the National Socialist regime? Because that regime had worked out a scheme whereby all Jews emigrating to what was then Palestine would be trained in agricultural arts and other skills needed to build a new society.
Jewish owned money could not be removed from Germany but, those funds were used to purchase agricultural requirements and other equipment needed for a new society.
Read about the Transfer Agreement before spouting off about things you learned from comic books, Hollywood, or court historians. HdC

Provide some REAL evidence, forensic, or authenticated documentary information, that would substantiate the assertion that the USA waged war correctly against the Axis powers.
The old saw that Germany declared war first on the USA is legally correct however, the USA, while officially neutral, waged war on German shipping long before the declaration of war. Germany finally declared war so that it could legally fight back.

A modicum of research would enlighten you with the fact that thanks to the German army and the SS, Europe is still comprised of western nations with a modicum of freedoms now under severe attack.

Without operation Barbarossa we’d all be speaking Russian and living in Communist heaven.

If you prefer this you can always move to North Korea or Cuba.

Excellent summary on money and its creation. To reiterate: A sovereign government can create money out of thin air!

However, as we used to say to each other in another life and place: There is no such thing as a free lunch. If the creation of money, out of thin air, gets out of hand, ie. the dollars put in circulation outweigh the amount of value/wealth created in that country’s economy, the result will be inflation. Inflation reduces the value of the money used in everyday transactions.

By borrowing money the government increases its options on how to deal with the current deficits: It can increase taxes to repay the loans necessitated by the overspending. Combined with some inflation the loans are then repaid with less valuable, ie. cheaper money.

The end result will be one of three scenarios: Higher inflation (the money in circulation buys less than before), higher taxes (so that the government can repay the earlier loans), or both higher taxes and higher inflation.

Having observed various governments in action over a long time, I can see higher taxes and higher inflation in the future.

Excellent summary of the situation in Germany in the 1930’s. Thank you.

On this blog go to American Pravda and read “Denying the Holocaust”. Over 2 thousand comments with the recurring refrain of “where is the evidence?”, and not ONE of the replies could point to any forensic or other scientific evidence to support any assertions regarding the claim of 6 million gassed Jews.
If you were to peruse the thousands of books, and hundreds of movies made about the “holy six million” there is not a single, solitary shred of evidence that would stand up in an impartial court of law.
I suggest you read the transcripts of the Ernst Zundel trials conducted in Toronto during the 1980’s where he was tried and convicted of offending Toronto Jews. The Supreme Court of Canada overturned both convictions of “spreading false news” ie questioning the veracity of the claims of “6 million”.
You should know that this pissing and moaning about the “poor 6 million Jews” has been going on at least since the mid 1800’s. You can check this yourself by perusing the online archives of the New York Times newspaper.
You do know that in the USA the are more museums about the Holocaust than there are about the civil war? Go figure.

Germany was NEVER a military danger to anybody during peace times, unless, of course, war was declared or Germany was invaded. The French invaded Germany 3 times between WWI and WWII. The real danger to Europe and the rest of the world was Soviet Communism expansionism.

What evidence can you supply that proves the claims of the Holocaust? Bear in mind that so-called eye witness testimony is the least reliable of evidence and practically useless unless supported by forensic or other scientific evidence.
You should know that in over 2000 responses in the thread on this blog discussing this very issue a recurring refrain is “where is the indisputable evidence”? Not a single reply among the thousands could furnish that!
Perhaps it is time to seriously review your belief in the great H?

Why am I not surprised by your reply? Just more arm waving but no hard evidence.
I especially enjoyed your referral to “rational people” and “confession in Hitler’s last words”…
Because exactly the opposite is the case.

Agree with your conclusion, but your fear of possible German militarization as a threat is groundless. There is not one single instance that Germany has declared war or invaded another country unless that country declared war on Germany (eg. Britain, France, Canada, etc.), aided and abetted enemies of Germany (Belgium, Holland, USA), or was a threat to Germany because of pending invasion by Britain (Norway, Denmark). The Soviet Union was poised to invade Germany and all of Europe which Germany fought so courageously to curtail.
Perhaps what we are experiencing now is karma/payback for the swinish allies for opposing Germany’s quest. 1945 payback.

Why do you miss the point I was making? Germany was NEVER a threat to nations at peace! Declare war on Germany then don’t go around pissing and moaning how militaristic and warlike the Germans were/are.

Just wait until these AA brainiacs are in charge of designing bridges, airplanes, buildings, elevators, etc. Should be fun.

And how many of those “20 million” (I thought I’d read 27 million somewhere?) were murdered by your communist police battalions that killed anyone who made a move to retreat or surrender?
The Soviets were their own worst enemies.

So the Germans should have invited the Soviet Communists to invade Germany and Europe? There s something wrong with your logic methinks.

Anyone with a functioning synapse can easily determine the tribe that was responsible for most, if not all, of the grief in post czarist Russia.
Would I write or say so without a pseudonym? No. You may call me a coward if you like, I just don’t care.
Unfortunately in today’s western world “the tribe” will make your life absolute hell, and I was not cut out to be a martyr.
As an example for my above assertion I simply use the name of Ernst Zuendel and his trials in Toronto.
Recall that the Canadian “Human Rights” Tribunal has ruled that “The truth is no defence”.

Your mind reading abilities must be failing because no one that knows me has ever called me stupid or bastard.
Only out-argued scoundrels need to resort to ad hominym attacks.
Your thought process is interesting though: You accuse your enemies of the crimes you are guilty of.

Read ICEBREAKER by Suvorov (sp?)

“…debunked by real historians like David Glantz…” If that is the best you can do, I rest my case.

As I said: “Exactly the opposite is true.”

I did not offer it as proof of anything. I merely pointed out a point of view that has been debated and well accepted by numerous historians in both Germany and Russia.
When someone comes along and throws out Glanz to counteract my point of view, I know I am truly conversing with mental midgets.

“A crucial underlying cause of the First World War was Britain’s belief that only a preventative war could forestall a rising Germany, but I suspect that an important secondary cause was the parallel German notion that similar measures were necessary against a rising Russia.”

Some of this confirmed in Docherty and Macgregor, Hidden History, but some, not. Russian was not “rising” in the sense that Germany had already risen. Russia was politically, economically, socially a backward country, an enormous backward country, that needed a lot of help and foreign investment and know-how to modernize. Germany already was the most modernized country on the continent, largely due to her advanced educational system, relatively advance political system, and *relative* lack of the ancient rigid class system that handicapped Britain. From this p.o.v. the rapid rise of Jews into leading positions in German banking, education, science, communications, the arts, and industry (despite very real obstacles and very real anti-semitism) can be compared positively to Britain’s relative lack of social mobility and consequent failure to use all of the country’s potential human resources.

According to HH, “underlying cause” is way too anodyne: a group that Docherty and Macgregor label the Secret Elite, originally instigated by Cecil Rhodes and a few others, inlcluidng Natty Rothschild (who financed Rhodes’s diamond mines and other activities in Africa), actively connived to drive Britain toward war with Germany starting in about 1890. Germany, once unified, was cranking on all pistons economically, socially, intellectually, scientifically, and was on track to overcome Britain in all of these metrics. Sound familiar? So, war was the only way to get rid of the new competitor.

Per Docherty and Macgregor, and amply documented by them where documents have not been destroyed, King Edward VII was part of this conspiracy, which successfully undermined cabinets and “official” government policies by placing conspirators in crucial posts and and making secret treaties—first with japan, then with France, then with Russia. Britain prepared Japan as a proxy by supplying it, over a period of 10 years, with a first-class navy, with which it tanked the Russian navy.

As for Germany seeing a dangerous rival in Russia, so far in my reading of the book (I am ca. 1/4 of way through) this is not the case. Wilhelm seems to have had far more “cousinly” feelings toward his cousin Nicholas, whereas Edward hated his cousin Wilhelm and started a charm offensive to move Nicholas and Russia into the British camp for the upcoming planned war, despite the hatred of the British public for Russia and its backward autocratic regime. The Russian state was easily manipulated because it had huge debts to the English Rothschilds, for construction of its rail lines and other industrial development. But Germany as the leaders in engineering, chemistry, etc. were natural allies of a developing country.

Furthermore, Britain and Russia were traditional enemies and competitors in Asia (the Great Game). Of course the whole pre-WW1 picture is vastly complicated by the makeup of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, with significant German and Slav (and Magyar) regions and loyalties.

Back to Britain and “underlying cause” getting a war started with Germany in order to bring Germany down and destroy a rival was a long-standing British project that was pursued proactively. British imperialists were not dumb. The Secret Elite had to wait for the death of Victoria and the accession of Edward to the throne to really get the ball rolling, but they had been working on this for at least a decade already, mainly infiltrating their men into both parties, the government and its ministries, cranking up the war machine (retooling the army and the navy), creating secret deals with France and Belgium, and “turning” the British public—manufacturing consent via an ongoing vicious negative PR campaign directed against Germany, Germans, and Wilhelm personally.

It’s funny, isn’t it? China never done nothing to Germany. While the US delivered hate, bombing, torture, intolerable cruelty, and insults.

You clarify some historic facts that I am not aware of. Nonetheless, the French intentions towards Russia were completely utilitarian and devoid of any ideological pursuits. France that had occupied Russia under Napoleon was beaten fairly and squarely by Prussia in 1870 when Napoleon III declared war and ended up losing Alsace Lorraine. Here an important footnote is seldom put under the light and that is Bismarck never wanted any territorial concessions from the French but knew that he will not be able to complete German unity without squashing any resistance from France. Unfortunately for France and Germany, the German generals twisted Bismarck’s hand into claiming Alsace Lorraine on military strategic grounds. Bismarck sought to encourage France to expand colonially into Africa hoping that the French will forget about Alsace Lorraine but the strategy failed. As Machiavelli states in the Prince “ it is easier for someone to forget who killed his father than who stole his land”.

It does not matter under which Tsars’ reign the Franco Russian entente started. Nicholas II was a mediocre political strategist who blundered the first time in his war with Japan who was financed by Jewish Zionist New York bankers under the leadership of Jacob Schiff, and almost lost his crown in 1905, and blundered again in 1914 when the assassinated Stolypin’s reforms of the agrarian land redistribution started to bear fruits by enriching a new class of farmers and catapulting Russia into the greatest grain producer by 1911. Nicholas II stampeded into WWI when he could have stayed neutral, and by his unwise decision to declare war on Germany confident about victory by forcing her to fight on two fronts, brought the end of the Romanov dynasty and the rise of communism.

“Only when Europeans throw these worthless actors …”

— Not possible. Any honest national leader will be suicided at once by security forces. In the EU, the intelligence community does not serve national interests anymore but has been converted into a tool for banksters and mega war-profiteers.

Exhibit One is the ongoing Assange saga when the corrupt courts and corrupt US/UK governments have broken all international rules and all rules of decency: https://consortiumnews.com/2021/02/19/letter-from-london-the-matter-of-assanges-lawyers-considering-a-cross-appeal/
They corrupt courts and governments protect the scum like Saville, Clinton, Cheney, and Blair but destroy good, decent people. They squeal about “human rights” and “western values”‘ while ruining western civilization.

Stella Moris:

Although Julian won at the Magistrates’ Court, the magistrate did not side with him on the wider public interest arguments. We wanted a U.K. court to properly quash the extradition… We wanted a finding that the extradition is an attempt to criminalise journalism, not just in the U.S. but in the U.K. and the rest of the world as well; and that the decision to indict Julian was a political act, a violation of the treaty, a violation of his human rights and an abuse of process. Julian’s extradition team is considering all these issues, and whether they can be cross-appealed.”

Note that the trashy PussyRiot and other “fighters for democracy” like MSM, Guaido, Zelensky, and the Friends of Israel in the UK are dead-silent about the violation of all and any rules in the Assange case.
Assange is a political prisoner.

“ At the same time presenting Germany in glowing terms and whitewashing her for the responsibility of starting two world wars: ”

Yet during WWI Germany was the last country to mobilise.
As for WWII, only a superficial historian would approach the subject of responsibility for the war without putting the ignoble Treaty of Versailles under full scrutiny.

History and historians will always be at odds through different theories. David Irving who was vilified like no other for challenging the victor’s narrative, was the most fact based historian who built his side of the story on genuine research and wrote many books about the subject of WWII with “Hitler’s War” being a landmark book that exposes the blatant lies of the victors.

Notwithstanding the history debate, I hope you agree that closing the rift between the Teutons and the Slavs is one of the most prominent hopes to create a new status quo that would check the highly disruptive policies of the Anglo Zionist Empire. It is time for Germany and Russia to turn the page and engage in full cooperation in league with China for a more balanced world.

Just a point re the Enigma machine. This enciphering device was never fully cracked. Parts were cracked — often as a result of user inertia (senders & receivers would often use the same phrases etc to check in/out per procedure). And of course, the Allies threw the kitchen sink at the enigma problem.

Our society celebrates weaklings, frauds, and complainers. MLK Jr, Anne Frank, Muh Slavery… these are the “American” events. Nevermind the White geniuses who created the modern world that everyone demands and takes for granted.

I am tired of this Nazi-like propaganda: there is only one way, “All is One” in the service of Russia/Germany.

What I said was exactly opposite. The knowledge that geography cannot be changed should give in-between countries like Poland the wisdom not to annoy either big neighbor. The only way a country like Poland, Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, and others in the same position can have independence is to keep good relations with both big powers without allying with either. Polish elites repeatedly failed in this for centuries, and keep pursuing the same suicidal course that led Poland to grief many times over.

The action that will do the most to stop “that shitty little country” is to join the ever growing voices that speak up about the fraudulent “holocaust”.

That impossible propaganda narrative is what truly prevents criticism of Jew supremacists.

See the “holocaust” scam debunked here: http://codoh.com

No name calling, no dodging debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

Truth is hate to those who hate the truth.

classic video:
Robert Faurisson “The Holocaust” as Religion: https://codoh.com/library/document/robert-faurisson-holocaust-religion-1992/en/