Did someone photoshop Macron out of that first photo?

I’ve been reading about the Northwest being touted as a potential ethnostate but how far Northwest?

Certainly not Washington or Oregon as they are some of the most leftie, cucked and pozzed states in the US. I get the feeling that if white nationalists tried to establish anything there they’d have a local civil war on their hands, and one they’d outright lose. Just look how antifa control the streets of Portland with self-imposed roadbloacks and total disregard for the law. And Seattle I suppose doesn’t even need such controls as I guess they’re just all antifa there, even the guys in suits. You wouldn’t want to be caught as an alt-righter on their streets.

As I wrote I’m not American but from what I read and from what I know from residents of those two Northwestern states I’d say no way.

Lyndon LaRouche died just recently. Can’t we get a write up on him? Much more interesting than this fellow I’d never heard of and got no interest in.

Those two NW states are actually fairly white and in that sense only they are ideal for white ethno states, which in view of their ethnic makeup they almost are. But ideologically they are not suitable. It’s a fact that those who live far from coloureds are generally the most anti racist, antifascist, liberal and leftie as they don’t have the negative experiences. As long as they don’t import large numbers of immigrants (but Bill Gates is importing Indians to Seattle) they are suitable destinations for white flight, but then you’d have to put up with other aspects of globohomo degeneracy in those communities.

If you read my comments carefully you will see that I was NOT proposing the NW as a viable option for an ethnostate but in fact critiquing this idea which is popular in some extremist circles, and that is why peterAUS had issues with my view, on this issue at least.

This anti-Bolshevism was the propaganda excuse given for the war against Soviet Russia. While National Socialism and Communism could not coexist long term and would have come to blows eventually despite any alliances, this was not the main aim of Germany’s wars in Eastern Europe and Russia. Neither were any petty skirmishes over some radio station on the border of Poland, whoever may have been responsible, the true reason for starting a world war, nor even protecting any German minorities repressed by the Poles. Not even correcting any injustices of the Versailles treaty, however unjust they may have been, was responsible for WW II, but the war was a continuation of earlier German policies from even before Russia turned Bolshevik and when the emperors of both Russia and Germany were cousins, as during WWI.

Those who keep insisting solely on Nazi anti-Bolshevism as the cause of German belligerence towards the USSR should reread “Chapter XIV: Eastern Orientation or Eastern Policy” of “Mein Kampf” by Adolf Hitler. It is clearly stated that Germany required soil for its growing population, “an adequately large space on this earth”, “The National Socialist movement must strive to eliminate the disproportion between our population and our area”, etc., i.e. ” living space”. Nazi territorial expansionist policies are further reiterated several times in numerous statements such as “the German nation can defend its future only as a world power”. Basically Hitler was just expressing the common-held view by many Germans that they are somehow better than others and deserve more than God portioned out to them on this Earth. Today Germans and others in the West are facing the same threat from overpopulation and the booming population in the Third World but this time the hordes are going north and west in search of their own living space.

And with conquest of new territory would have come not just more soil to resettle and feed the growing German population but also the resources to drive Germany’s military and other industries. So Nazi policy, as propagated even before they took power, would have brought them sooner or later into conflict with the British, French, and Russian/Soviet empires, and their foes understood this most clearly, and that is why Hitler’s diplomatic manoeuvres and his weighing of alliances with either the Brits (failed loony peace mission of Rudolf Hess’s flight to Scotland), the Ribbentrop- Molotov pact, came to nought. So of course, Churchill was advocating war on Germany long before he became PM and Stalin was preparing for war too, as Hitler had made his intentions clear.

It is my opinion that Germany would have lost the war even if it had occupied all of Europe as far as the Urals and invaded England, as the Brits and Soviets would have regrouped in their resource rich colonies and Siberia. If Franco, who even after Hitler and Mussolini helped him win the civil war, hadn’t stabbed them in the back by staying neutral, and had justly repaid them by joining the Axis and putting his own Spanish colonies and resources at their disposal, then maybe it would have been a more equal fight, but still with US joining the frey it is doubtful the Axis would have won.

Wars require and eat up resources in huge quantities and rapidly, both human and otherwise. It is basically an accountant’s game, and any bravery, and other martial qualities, are secondary. Hitler was aware of that and that is one of his main aims was to secure first the oil fields of Ploeshti in Romania, then onwards to the Soviet ones at Baku and further towards Iraq, Iran, Syria, those in British and French hands. Failing to achieve the aim of securing the most vital fuel resources to drive his war machinery, and once the Soviets regained the Romanian fields, all was lost as his tanks ground to a halt and further resistance was futile. Germans had even invented synthfuels to turn coal into petrol but that technology couldn’t quite meet the demands of industry and war.

So all these fanatical Nazi and commie fan boys that are to this day vehemently arguing and refighting old wars should ease off a little and keep cool heads as the future beckons. History has a lot to teach but repeating past mistakes just leads nowhere.

Hitler explicitly outlined his plans in his book (but is it really his own original work or was it written by a team to create the myth of this rags to power genius who rose to absolute heights from the dosshouses and streets of Vienna, I sometimes wonder?) and once he took power all hell was sure to break loose.

But if you really think that world Jewry planned the utter destruction of Germany long before the outbreak of the war, and if Germans were truly with their backs to the wall with no way out, then I suppose making a fight of it to the bitter end and the scorched earth was the only option. Funnily enough Israel in now in a similar position with a growing Zionist population in its piddly desert country surrounded by hostiles on all sides except for the sea on one, in constant war with its neighbours. Let’s see how it ends for them eventually.

“A certain amount of brutality” was the complete wiping out of 20,000 Russian villages by the Nazis. So what right have you got to complain about however the Red Army treated Germans on the rebound? Terrible as it may have been, Germans fared quite well in the end compared to if the Russians had wanted to pay them back in kind,

You write that US fought “half-heartedly” in Vietnam. If they went for a war of total annihilation millions of PRC Red Army soldiers would have poured over the border to drive them out. And if need be Russian pilots would have been flying those MIGs, and supplying the Viets with even more devastating weapons in abundance.

If it was the Georgia Guidestones it’d be understandable but I don’t think they were built yet. Still the symbolism is obvious – concrete as opposed to nature – and they’re showing you what they think.

A Russian order issued in the German language, yeah, and I’m the one who is silly.

I’m not denying that there wasn’t brutality, misinformation, disinformation, camouflage, false flags, propaganda lies, mistakes, miscalculations, cruelty, atrocities, etc. on all sides in that war but blaming Russians, Allies, communists for all German crimes is ridiculous.

I’ve indeed known personally some old people in Eastern Europe who lived through German occupation and Russian liberation who commented on the disciple and correct behaviour of the Germans as compared to the Russians but it really depends what specific experiences such went through. I have also met some old people who had personally witnessed crimes against civilians committed by the SS. In my earliest youth I’ve known people on all sides of that war and have heard various personal anecdotes from them while they were still alive, although I wasn’t particularly interested at that stage of my life, and many would rather forget their war experiences. I’ve even known a proud SS officer whose home was like a shrine to the Third Reich who was an exile in a non-European country sympathetic to Nazi refugees at the time, whom I couldn’t have imagined of committing atrocities but I never asked. Anyway war has a way of getting many to do the worst imaginable things, orders or no orders. And on the other hand many orders deemed too cruel, unjust or stupid were also ignored, others not and depends by whom and under what circumstances.

So Stalin and Hitler were both cruel .and brutal in their conduct of the war. Hitler ordered his soldiers at Stalingrad not to surrender and to keep the last bullet for themselves but of course they disobeyed. And when he no longer had any soldiers left he was mobilising 16 year old boys and 60 year old men in Berlin and giving them same orders, and ordering a scorched earth policy too when all was already lost. It’s surprising there was any male population remaining in Germany after the war.

You seem to be one of those who see it all black and white, and blame it all on one side, just like the other side does in reverse.

The left/right concept is no longer valid

Yes I sort of agree, and that was the point of my original comment.

Still I do find it strange when the alternative right, new right, affirmative right, neo-Nazis, call them whatever you will, accuse the current western governments and establishment of being “left wing”, “socialist”, “communist”. But how in the hell do they differ from the old “right wing” governments? They’re still pursuing the same old policies: wars for oil, neo-colonialism, regime change, interference in foreign nations. They’re still obsessing on maximising their profits more than ever, by getting fewer workers to do more work under worse conditions, by outsourcing to other countries with lower overheads, cheaper labour, worse labour and environmental laws, bringing in immigrant labour prepared to work under worse conditions for lower wages, etc. In fact these immigrants are just a new type of scabs or strikebreakers that instead of being bussed from neighbouring towns and counties are now flown in from other countries and continents to drive local workers out of jobs and into the dole queues. And these self-styled lefties and antifa are welcoming them and promoting them instead of confronting the scabs with baseball bats as one would expect since they are coming to threaten the livelihood and lives of the local workers, their women and their children. The ruling classes and governments have set back the achievements of the labouring masses that were won over a century of bitter class war and we’re now supposed to see them as some kind of lefties, commies, socialists. It doesn’t quite make sense.

So what if they’re now promoting some stupid gender/homo/bi/trans ideologies and pushing sexual deviancy, perversion and degeneracy into the societal mainstream? That doesn’t make them left-wing either. Those bloody ruling class bastards always had their homos and perverts in the past, so now they’ve come out of the closet into the open. Big deal! I don’t buy that this is some major fundamental paradigm shift in societal ideology that requires redefining the ruling filth and their system in these terms. And I’ve read all about this cultural Marxist bullshit, the original texts and the current interpretations from both the left and right perspectives.

I’ve come across some novel ideas trying to bridge the gap between the progressive/revolutionary right and left, such as the third position, Nazbol, Fourth Political Theory, but I find them all unsatisfactory in providing an adequate explanation of the current situation or a blueprint M.O. for getting us out of this worsening mess.

If the antifa and the self-styled neoNazis or alt-righters want to fight it out in the streets they’re welcome to it, but I don’t think anything useful will come out of that, and it is probably what the PTB want anyway and even promote through infiltrators and agents provocateurs.

I certainly haven’t come across any consistent and reasonably rational new ideology that I would follow as an activist or even a fellow traveller, let alone be an useful idiot for. Until something more adequate comes along my advice would be to become active in the struggle on an issue by issue basis and avoid divisive ideological disputes while on the front lines as this serves the rulers.

Germany owes 5,398,267,000,000 USD; Greece owes 483,369,000,000 USD

Why don’t you go tell those Germans to go pay their far bigger debts than picking on the Greeks?

The Molotov Ribbentrop pact actually did lead to a lot of industrial and military cooperation between Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia but it didn’t last long, and I made comments regarding this elsewhere and other readers contributed their views too.

Siberia’s mineral wealth is enormous and has long been the envy of many and the cause of past wars. Clearly, western corporations would like to get their hands on it and there are continuing attempts to destabilise and pressurise Russia as everyone is aware. Any attempts to go to war against Russia could well activate MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) so I think this is highly unlikely, unless some really mentally deranged fanatics gain power in the west.

But whether all the parties could come to an arrangement to fight a conventional war without launching nuclear missiles for whatever other purposes they may want to fight such a war I really don’t know. Why I mention this possibility is the fact that poison gas was not used on battlefields during WWII although it was widespread during WWI, and even that supposedly dastardly Hitler refrained from using it (except apparently for mass exterminations in the concentration camps but this is disputed by many readers of this site).

But even evaluating a conventional war, although Russia’s population has decreased significantly since the breakup of the USSR, they do have advanced conventional military technologies and sufficient numbers of well trained troops with a good morale and superior fighting spirit, and limitless fuel and other mineral resources for their military industries. And in any future war, China could play the role that the US played with regard to Russia during WWII (“land-lease”), i.e. China could supply vehicles required for moving the Russian weapons systems and other necessary products. My impression is that Russia has a different weapons development and production philosophy to the US. While the US produces weapons in huge quantities at great expense, Russia concentrates on developing and testing ever more advanced weaponry knowing that if required it can produce them in large numbers, much as it did during WWII after having lost enormous quantities of firepower and manpower in the initial German push during Operation Barbarossa. If you look at those Russian losses they were indeed phenomenal, yet Russia quickly recovered putting back on the battlefield more advanced weapons in massive quantities. And of course if China were to join Russia as an ally, with its massive manpower and its own military technologies, then there would be less doubt in the outcome of such a war.

Obviously it would be tragic for the white race should they fight another major war considering their demographic decline, and it is sad to see what is happening in Ukraine, but then who caused that trouble that led to that conflict?

N.B.!!!
But anyway, remember those words of Hitler I quoted earlier: “The National Socialist movement must strive to eliminate the disproportion between our population and our area” obviously by invading “living space” in other countries. Well, that is nowadays the United Nations population policy. In its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in SDG target 10.7., United Nations (UN) Member States commit to facilitate by 2030 the “orderly, safe, and responsible migration and mobility of people, including through implementation of planned and well-managed migration policies” (UN, 2015). And you all know which people they are moving and in what direction. They are certainly not planning to resettle Europeans in Africa, Asia, and Latin and South America. The only difference is that they do not state that this movement would be by force of war but through the cooperation of UN member governments and their leaders such as Merkel, Macron, etc.

Hi Robin,

I looked briefly at Andrew Lang’s video and he seems very capable and speaks sense, but it’s aimed more at the US political and electoral scene that I am not so familiar with.

Yes indeed, automation, together with immigration, will kill off the working class completely, or whatever is left of it. Perhaps the outsourcing of major industries to China and elsewhere wasn’t just for more profits but also to destroy the working class so the bosses could feel more secure in their power, or perhaps it was just an added bonus they didn’t really plan for. The changing social class structure was something that bothered me and that is one reason I think we need a new ideology to correspond to this new situation rather than the old concepts. But it would require a genius of the type that comes once in a generation to think one up.

The basic income has also been proposed in various European countries, but in a way people being on welfare because of unempolyment and underemployment amounts to pretty much the same thing. I find it problematic that a huge section of the population will be completely cut off from the production process and with no societal worth or value. This will have some major psychological effects on people. I suppose it kind of sounds ideal that people will receive an income without working and be able to devote themselves to arts, crafts, sports, recreation, religion and spirituality, or doing just nothing except playing video games or staring at their mobile phone screens posting and watching selfies. But I find such an existence somewhat lacking in meaning and pointless, but I may be wrong – it may in fact be the opposite as why bother slaving away for a living when you could do something you prefer and more useful and meaningful to yourself personally? At the same time they’ll be watched over and controlled in an increasingly all-encompassing police state that will seek to control every, even the minutest aspect, of life, people’s opinions and thoughts. So something like a communist utopia (or dystopia rather) without much freedom, or a Brave New World combined with 1984.

Definitely the post-industrial automated society will require less workers and hence a lower population, and although cutting down the population to an extent could be desirable, it is also quite scary if those in power desire to push it to the extreme. At present it is only the white race that is in demographic decline, all the others are growing in numbers. Some claim that this is the plan because other races will be easier to control but I am not sure about that. Experience shows that other races are far more volatile and aggressive, and more difficult to control, but they lack organisational ability, and their any rebellions tend to be spontaneous, disorganised, aimless and without clear purpose – sort of just the venting off of steam and pent up anger and frustration.

Maybe coming generations just won’t really care that they don’t have any control over society or their own lives. Perhaps there will be a major drop in the level of consciousness and awareness as people’s concentration and attention spans decrease and they’re turned into zombies and mental robots. On the other hand, as industry automates and people have a lot more free time on their hands, many may choose to join the struggle and protest. I really can’t say.

I seem to have more questions than answers really.

For now the yellow vest movement in France seems promising and we’ve certainly read about it on this site. From most of the images we see it does seem to have a rather large number of older boomer generation types involved, for whatever reason. Others have commented that there is an absence of young people and students but they have had their own protests simultaneously and we have seen some strong images of the police lining kids up against the wall on their knees, students attacking schools, etc. You can definitely say that there’s something in the air, and popular anti-government protests are arising everywhere across Europe stimulated by what people have seen on French streets, but whether they’ll lead to any meaningful change or be exploited by political party hacks remains to be seen.

There’s something to be said for seeing the current struggle as one of nationalism against globalism, or better still of populism against globalism, but this does have a class component too.

The struggle continues, as they say, but it’s changing shape and form, and it’s moving into uncharted waters, for better or for worse.

Again I’m not saying much, as someone wrote critically of my first comment in this thread, but I can’t really do any better. There are certainly others who are far more opinionated, and probably better informed, than I am on these matters, on both the so-called left and right, and I’m taking their arguments into consideration, but I’m just not sure how correct they are.

These days I spend most time in Europe but I haven’t been to France for ages. I have actually stopped following the media except for a few websites. I tend to stay away from where the action is as I tend to avoid cities and large urban conurbations. I’m just reduced to commenting and let others deal with the trouble out there. I’ve done more than my share when I was younger but it doesn’t seem to have done much good. Things change, but stay the same, or “same same but different” as the Thais put it.

I’m not familiar with Vanessa Beeley but I have read some writings by a very interesting French author living in Damascus, Syria – Thierry Meyssan. He definitely goes where the action is, and he was an eyewitness to NATO’s war in Libya and to the events in Syria. He’s one of the earliest members of the 911 Truth Movement having published “The Big Lie” in 2002. He is a freedom of speech activist, supported Libya’s Gaddafi and now Syria’s Assad in their war against the globalists, supported Trump’s original platform, and is pro- Putin. He’s apparently left-wing and has been involved in anti- NF militia and anti – extreme right wing activities, even participating in surveillance activities aimed at French right wing groups, something that I wouldn’t have been aware of just from reading his writings and interviews. I guess it takes all sorts, and Tommy Robinson in the UK, another free speech activist, is a Zionist, and opposed only to Muslim immigration but not immigration in general.

Guillaume Durocher did report a couple of times recently on the Yellow Vests here at UR. I found it quite interesting when that Alain Finkielkraut tried to join the protests and was driven away by anti-Zionists.

I agree most people think they’re better than others, and that can be a problem when trying to deal with them in a an objective way.

“Ozymandias” – brilliant poem by Shelley, thanks for the reminder of Kipling too.

I’m through re-fighting old battles, and the white man ain’t fighting any new ones even on his own soil. This will be the fastest and most complete victory of Islam in Europe. Last time it took them centuries and they never got past Vienna. They’re taking over the major cities already, and I can’t say “slowly and surely” as it’s faster than anyone could have thought.

So what’s it gonna be? Roll up the prayer mat, pick up your Koran, and off to the mosque to kneel down and bang your head on the floor. And that mosque is probably some converted church which Christians stopped attending some years ago. Eh? What would those knights of old who gathered at the churches for mass before heading on the Crusades have to say? Shame, shame, what a bloody race. No wonder the muslims have no respect.

A Jewish writer long ago said, that the most enduring and deepest cause of ‘anti-semitism’ amongst Europeans, is that Europeans deep down know, that their own ancient traditions and beliefs and culture, were largely wiped out and destroyed by the predatory, judaising Abrahamic religions from the mid-East deserts

Must we have a Jew opine on everything and bring up the anti-semitic canard when discussing anything? I’m not implying you Brabantian, but this Jewish author whoever he may be.

If Jesus and the early Christians were Jews then why should Europeans who accepted Christianity become anti-Semites? If any Europeans are anti-semites it is because of their experience with Jews in Europe and has nothing to do with what race Jesus or the early Christians may have been. And why are Jews an issue at all in Europe, haven’t they got their own country to go somewhere in this world instead of complaining about their hosts wherever they go?

And even if Jesus was black, does it mean we now have to accept blacks settling in white countries even if we may worship a black man as a son of God? Should the Chinese and North Koreans accept to be flooded by Jews and Germans just because they worship Marx and Engels, a Jew and a German as false twin Gods, or invaded by white Russians, because Lenin is their version of the “son of God” and Stalin “the grandson of God”? Get real people.

Linh,

I wonder if those Vietnamese shamans give out winning lottery numbers. Some Thai Buddhist Abbots and monks do sell lottery numbers they claim will win. I once knew a Chinese guy who even braved an emergency in southern Thailand to go visit the monastery to pick up his number. He swore by a certain Abbot or monk there that he was for real and that he often won at the 4 digit lottery with numbers he bought from him. I never asked if this giving out of lucky numbers involved any ceremony and whether one could submit one’s own numbers to turn them lucky, or whether you just took what the monk gave you. This particular guy used to fly in from overseas so I don’t know if you can order the numbers from the monastery by phone call and a wire transfer, or if this Chinaman just liked to visit the monastery. I’m just asking out of interest as with my luck I doubt even if I paid a monk for a number that it would come up a winner.

No comments from you about the two monkeys up in Hanoi. It was all about the meeting of the two nuke rocket men, but did Trump and his team hold any talks with the Vietnamese party honchos about their future relations and plans, especially considering Chinese military activity in the Spratly islands which displeases both USA and Vietnam, or has Vietnam changed its policy regarding Chinese military buildup there like the Philippines has under Duerte?

Hi Linh,

I like those instructions to the Viet kids. Of course the question is always how well are they followed, or will be when the kids grow up. Still my best wishes to them.

I won’t bother commenting on what they teach kids in the west, or the values the teachers impart to their charges, lest I ruin the message in your comment with negativity. Better to end on a positive note.

Cheers!

While of course international law must be promoted, as it supposedly is by everyone, even by the US whenever it suits its purpose, nobody really gives a rat’s ass about it, as it is hardly ever upheld if it stands in the way of the powerful and mighty.

I think what has really deterred the US military intervention so far has not been mentioned, but the planners in the State Department, CIA, Pentagon, and wherever else they make such decisions, have surely considered it, are the masses of freedom loving and anti-imperialist, and mostly left wing, people of South and Latin America, in spite whatever the political coloration of their present governments and regardless of what their MSM spew out as being public opinion.

An invasion of Venezuela by the US military, even with any Colombian and Brazilian assistance, has the potential to ignite the entire region and seriously threaten US long-term interests and the newly elected right wing governments, and surely this is the last thing they would all want. I think the protests and public unrest US military intervention would unleash would be something unseen of in this world previously, and would make the Yellow Vests protests look like a weekend picnic. Not to mention the potential for revitalising guerilla wars and terrorist activity in an area rich with “gringo” targets. I don’t think the US, or the current leaders of Brazil, Colombia, etc. would want the region to plunge into chaos. The US got away with it with Grenada and Panama, but taking on a country such as Venezuela would send a much stronger message to the people elsewhere. Especially if the Venezuelans can offer a stiff resistance and not cave in quickly, or mount a viable insurgency against any US occupation quisling government.

Maybe this Maduro regime is useless and doesn’t deserve to survive, and doesn’t merit popular support inside and outside of the country, but US imperialist machinations and interests throughout the region surely deserve a severe drubbing, and more than just a bloody nose, considering the bloody history of US interference, and I think the Latinos are capable of it.

in order to survive

Newsflash: America was essentially a “white ethnostate” for its entire existence, up until the fateful passage of Hart-Celler in 1965

I hadn’t realised that blacks didn’t arrive in the U.S. until 1965.

In any case you’ve missed the point in spectacular fashion. The whites of 2019 are not the whites of 1965. The whites of 1965 did not consider countries that were more or less white ethnostates to be morally any different from countries that were multi-racial, multi-cultural or multi-ethnic.

An enormous proportion of the whites of 2019 consider a white ethnostate to be inherently an evil nazi racist concept. And they believe that the United States has not only a God-given right but a duty to destroy any such nation. They believe that bombing and invading such an an evil nazi racist state would be a moral crusade even more sacred than the moral crusade against Hitler. That would certainly include a white ethnostate that tried to break away from the US. – in fact that would be a particularly holy moral crusade.

You’re talking about the white Americans of today, who think it’s worth risking the nuclear annihilation of the whole planet in order to punish Vladimir Putin for not being sufficiently pro-homosexual.

How many whites buy into this antiracist Social Justice agenda? It’s hard to say. Probably at least 40% are true believers. Most of the remainder will go along with whatever gets them more Likes on Facebook. Whether the true believers are 30%, 40% or 50% doesn’t matter. The point is that those whites would be a mortal threat to the existence of a white ethnostate. They would have to be expelled.

The most dangerous enemies white people face are white liberals.

Some people are blind and deaf, or just fools who repeat ad nauseam Einstein’s definition of an idiot, or just shameless idiots (as in that saying “fool me once …), or just plain bastards propagating the eternal lie, or bots (but do they really need to pay people to post comments on websites with so many idiots anyway taken in by their MSM lies?). It’s a shame seeing people propagating viewpoints of the wealthy and powerful, especially when they won’t benefit in any way when their evil plans come to fruition. What benefits did ordinary westerners get from supporting wars in the Middle East? Getting blown up by terrorists and raped by invading refugees in their own countries maybe.

Thanks for the links and videos but I for one can’t be bothered looking at the details, finer points, and all the wealth of evidence that proves a point – by now I know the general outline of things, it’s always the same old, same old, just applied to a new country. Anyway good work on collating all this and hopefully it benefits someone not yet convinced.

I personally don’t seek any benefits from these military adventures, and would have been happy if Saddam and Gaddafi had kept on running their countries however they wished.

Neither do I dispute that those who rule the west are the bigger terrorists, and not just because they murder civilians in their overseas wars but by encouraging, in various ways, terrorism against their own citizens.

But if you think that Islamist terrorists killing people on the streets of Europe and US is somehow “the oppressed fighting back”, you are wrong. There is ample evidence that they are the creation of the very same western intelligence agencies and a false opposition. And even the very fact that they manage to mount their actions in an almost total police and surveillance state should indicate that someone in authority is turning a blind eye if not actually collaborating with them. And by welcoming them as refugees and allowing invasive and hostile muslim communities, from which they spring up to exist in the west, the governments have really shown whose side they on, and it is not on the side of their own citizens.

Whites tend to build their own houses and not ask someone else to do it for them.

Where do you get that idea? The Jew builds your house by selling it at a much higher price as a mortgage. Then before it becomes yours he sacks you from your job, closes down his factory, moves it to China, Mexico or wherever, and then his bank repossesses it and you “stupid white man” paid the Jew for nothing.

My favorite line when Hugo took over a dozen or so years ago was uttered by an Indian lady…”Hugo is going to build me a house.”

Maybe this Hugo is just more generous than your Jew.

If you’re a white man you’re a disgrace to the race, or a Jew who thinks he’s white. If you’re one of the few whites who didn’t ask the Jew banker to build your house then my sincere apologies.

Those browns and blacks seem to be marching fairly well, only not to go home but to invade other people’s living space, of course organised by Soros, UNHC, or whoever else is funding and planning their migrations.

It’s all very well wishing and hoping but fighting back is all that matters and nobody in western Europe and North America is doing it. A few individual exceptions don’t count for anything as that person just gets taken out; e.g. some American Polish guy, Tom Kawczynski, who used to be a town manager was fired from his job and vilified for trying to make a little Maine community of less than 1,000 inhabitants white separatist. Whites are not showing much of their renowned organisational ability in resisting the invasion of their territories and if anything are organising to assist their enemies. If whites want to be left on their own it looks to me they will have to lose significant chunks of their territory, and they’ll have to fight even to achieve that, but they’re not doing even that. As if this is allowed to go on they could well be facing a South African scenario at some date in the future. I’m no longer socially well connected and have opted to have as little as possible to do with the system, but reading what those who are better informed write, it seems worse that I could imagine. I would tend to believe that to every action there is a reaction, and that the pendulum should swing the other way sometime, but will it? Civilisations can also sink into oblivion never to return, and many whites have been brainwashed to believe this is how it should go with theirs, if they think at all about such matters.

I think white Americans should worry more about their own future as a nation and a race than interfering in any way in other countries, Venezuela or wherever. So some wish to express solidarity for those there suffering under Maduro’s incompetent socialism, if that is what it really is. Why? Who is expressing solidarity with white Americans who will soon become a racial minority in their own country? Most of the world would just love to see them suffer not only defeats in their foreign military misadventures (and I do too), but also humiliated in their own country by the soon to be coloured majority (not my sentiments in this regard).

This still doesn’t explain why Jews were so successful in mobilising the masses in various nations to their socialist, communist, Menshevik, Bolshevik causes. Obviously the masses accepted that these Jews, by becoming communists, had become atheists and internationalists and hence no longer Jews.

Also this association between Jews and communism, although it is true that most of the communist leaders were Jews in Russia and Eastern Europe, discredits the ideas of socialism and communism, which have been popular in many other countries throughout the world with little or no Jewish presence or leadership.

And now that the socialist and communist ideas have been replaced by the worst kind of neo-liberal capitalism in Russia and Eastern Europe, again under the overwhelming influence of Jewish oligarchs and their western Jewish financiers and collaborators, very few people there are blaming the evils of their communist past on the Jews but instead on the ideas of socialism and communism. So you can inveigh against the communists but if you condemn the Jews for it you’ll be accused of anti-semitism. And those same communist Jews have now privatised most of the industries into their own hands and have declared themselves capitalists.

And it’s all well and fine saying that communism and capitalism are two sides of the same coin, and so are Nazism and Zionism, and there was indeed a coin minted in pre-WWII Hitler’s National Socialist Germany to prove this:

https://i1.wp.com/hollowhoax.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/mogv-part-12-2278-coin-minted-to-honor-the-joint-nazi-zionist-effort.jpg?resize=500%2C280&ssl=1

but it just reinforces the idea of these all-powerful Jews who control everything, and it could well be a good description of the state of the world, but you find a way out of it and tell me.

I for one wouldn’t want to live in Venezuela because it has one of the highest crime and murder rates in the world, and I don’t think that would change much whatever regime is in power. In fact that Maduro can’t be a very good communist as they tend to go heavy on the criminals. Cuba’s murder rate is slightly less than that of the US, and Venezuela’s is more than 10 times greater. But I’m not saying that someone like Fidel being in charge in Caracas would be able to bring that down to a reasonable rate.

Still I would defend him against any US invasion or interference. But what does”defend” mean in this context? It’s not that any of us would actually go and fight for him.

I’m not in favour of associating Judaism with Christianity and describing the modern western world thus.

Judeo-Masonic is a far better descriptor of the west as there’s very little that’s Christian about it.

Yes, I agree there are far more Jews around than we suspect. My favourite Jewish name is of one Wilhelm Reich, no less, the first name of a German emperor and the surname the German word for empire. Figure that.

Those same ones then claim that Jews somehow infiltrated and corrupted capitalism and that they could run capitalism better without the Jews, without being honest and telling it like it is – that Capitalism is Judaims/Talmudism, and it would still be JudeoCapitalism even without the Jews. And I suppose they think they can have democracy without the Jews when Ezra Pound defined it simply as a “country run by Jews”.

OK, this interview is a bit dated and not the best of quality but Tommy explains why he is a Zionist:

Video Link

I don’t know what point you’re trying to make. US presidents are far greater criminals than Castro or Maduro anyway.

And I said I would support the Cuban and Venezuelan people in any struggle against US intervention. And what has that got to do with wanting to move there to live? It’s like saying all those in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and wherever else who like USA, and supported US in their wars should move to the US. Oh, yes, and many indeed are.

1. Capitalism sounds utopian to me. Good in theory bad in practice, just like they say about communism.

2. I think I didn’t misread Pound.He did say: “Democracy is now defined in Europe as a ‘country run by Jews’”. So “defined by whom”? Certainly not by any of the proponents of European democracy.

Here’s that Roosh V character gloating recently how “white people have become too weak”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOY9yWMuhzw

Video Link

He does make some interesting points though.

Yes I prefer how Nick Griffin’s views have evolved. I think Tommy thinks much the same as he did then. Two years ago he went to Israel and rode atop an IDF tank in the Golan Heights.

I don’t know if you’re interested in this issue of returning Jihadis that is quite topical at the moment, but Thierry Meyssan has an interesting take on it:

https://www.voltairenet.org/article205314.html

Interesting comparison between Tommy and Thierry is that they are both free speech activists, anti-fascists and anti-racists, yet Tommy is a pro-Zionist anti-Islamist while Thierry is a pro-Palestinian anti-Zionist. I guess it becomes difficult to share a platform in a common struggle even when people agree on many themes.

911 is more than history, it’s still current and topical. Because, if you remember, after the event President Bush declared the War on Terror promising that it would last for the next 15 years and launched the invasion of Afghanistan. Well the 15 years are over and the US is still in Afghanistan. So no 911, no war on terror, no invasions and bombings here and there. I’d say 911 is most relevant until some other US president declares that the war on terror is finally over. Then we can relegate 911 to history, same like Pearl Harbor became history after World War II was over.

1. In a thread on 29th January (Venezuela, the Deep State, and Subversion of the Trump Presidency) I wrote :

Modern capitalism is simply legalised loan sharking and debt slavery. There are no free markets, fair competition, or whatever else are the principles of this utopian capitalist system you all believe in. It’s all about getting everyone hooked on debt to service interest on their loans and controlling markets, controlling just about everything. And it’s not as if the money they lend you, paper or electronic, is real in terms of any value. I don’t know what those smart economists are all about.

And you can easily check how much in debt everyone is starting with US.

2. Again you define democracy as an ideal, Pound as reality.

Isn’t that the same how people complain about communism, that it looks good on paper but doesn’t work well in reality?

Yes, my own words, in that other thread I mentioned.

The official story of Pearl Harbor is not truthful in that the US had warnings from several sources that it was going to happen. Now what were they supposed to do? Send their ships and air force out to meet the Japanese navy and fight it out at sea? It would have still started the war but perhaps it would not be as clear who actually started it. Unless you think it was a genuine false flag perpetrated by the US military itself with planes painted with Japanese insignia.

Oh cry me a river for the German victims of Nazism. I wonder if you show as much sympathy for those Germans today who are being raped, murdered, and brutalised by muslim criminal pedophiles you welcomed into your country, or as much hatred for the Islamist perpetrators as you express for Hitler and the Nazis. And if I were Russian this time round I don’t think I’d want to come and save you from the Islamo-fascists once they take over your country. And I’d watch out that in any teaching exchanges you are not promoting the “dirt” that you teach your kids in sex education, gender studies, women studies, or whatever other nonsense you have introduced into your schools. And I certainly hope Russians have stopped you Germans adopting any Russian children to put them through your education system and expose them to dangers from Islamist fanatics and maniacs while walking your streets, not even one more child.

But sure teach whatever you want in your history classes, even that the Weimar Republic was the height of western civilisation because Jewish pimps were selling German children to pedophile tourists outside hotels for a pittance.

And what would your answer be? Oh they are not all like that, all those muslims and Jews, or they’re misunderstood. But all Nazis are that bad and are not misunderstood? And one could post as many links to show you precisely what those muslims and Jews are like, what their faith teaches them and instructs them to do to you, and details all their plans that they have with regard to you, but of what use would it be?

Perhaps it was the tone of my wording that makes you think I was disagreeing with you or trying to pick an argument. I was just adding some more detail and perhaps giving a slightly different perspective, but of course I agree with you fully that the criminals should be exposed, tried, and sentenced.

I have never been a Nazi sympathiser, nor a communist apologist (although I could sound as either if any of my statements are taken out of context or misunderstood), but I’m just trying to have a more balanced discourse rather than see everything as black and white, like you do, and I try not to see the current situation in terms of outdated ideological and philosophical standpoints, if at all possible. As far as Hitler goes, I can appreciate much of what he did in Germany in terms of policy, and I think he was popular amongst other European nations too at the time because of his internal policies that others would have liked to emulate, but of course once his army crossed the borders I would have seen him as an aggressor and an enemy.

I’m actually quite happy that you are so optimistic and have come here to inject a bit of that positivity, but you started off dismissing us all as “dirt” regardless of our varying individual viewpoints, and expect us to be polite to you, and I think we have. You would be surprised that many would agree with much of what you wrote in your last comment even though they may not share your ideology. Most of the readers of this site are familiar with the information you gave on US interventionism, and very few here support US imperialism, even those you would label as neo-Nazis, fascists, or alt-righters, or should I say especially they don’t support US foreign policy. But there are disagreements about appropriate labels to attach to different political currents influential in current society and the proper characterisation of developments since WWII and since the fall of the Berlin wall, sort of fine tuning of our world views.

No muslims have remotely dones anything comparable to us.

They’re just coming to finish off what’s left of you. I suppose Hitler had his share of the blame for the misfortune that befell the German people during the war and those losses in lives, but others may have a different opinion, and I can’t see what is the harm in trying to get to the bottom of things in a civilised discourse instead of spouting out simplistic hackneyed phrases and slogans: Nazi – bad, commie – good, Jew – ?

In any country there are people claiming to be Napoleons, Julius Caesars, etc. Should anyone except psychiatrists pay attention?

Nice one, that made me laugh.

About Ukraine, maybe it was decided somewhere higher up, and even higher up than Nuland or whoever on the ground, that things should go the way they went and that eventually Ukraine should be broken up. The way things stand now it’s unlikely it will survive as a unified country. I’m not sure if Yanukovich should be blamed for giving up and doing a runner, maybe he was instructed to so proceed, and the decision could have been out of his hands. We’ll have to wait and see what happens there. Hopefully some resolution can come quickly so the war can come to an end and people can go back and start rebuilding their lives.

Oh yes, I would have preferred using “commenter Mike” but when I tried posting my first comment I got the response that it was taken, so I next chose “commentator Mike” and as it was accepted I ran with it. I forgot to try the American spelling with the “o”. But you are quite right about the difference in meaning. I didn’t quite think it mattered in this context as it’s just a pseudonym that I can easily remember.

According to Collins dictionary, “commentator” also stands for:

2. a person who writes notes on a text, event, etc

So maybe the difference is subtle. Often we’re not directly commenting on the text of the author but on other comments, or occasionally bringing up other matters not related to the text, and often the threads drift away from the topic. I try to keep my comments short, but some do write texts to rival the original that the authors put up.

It’d be like me asking you shouldn’t it be “Che Guevara” instead of “Che Guava”.

Yes, I agree. I just don’t know whether the planners in Washington thought Russia would not react at all. Or perhaps they expected, or even wanted, Russia to act even more forcefully than just annexing Crimea and supporting the uprising in Lugansk and Donetsk, for whatever reasons known to themselves.

My, my, we are sensitive!

I couldn’t care less whether you chose your name as a spoof on Guevara or because you like guava, pink or green. Don’t you have somewhere better to go to hurl insults and fire your ad hominem attacks?

Any excuse to derail a thread, eh?

Talha,

In those countries you mentioned, Islam was imparted by a few Arab traders who ventured there and did not settle in great numbers or replace the local population.

What is happening in western Europe is that large numbers of muslims are actually settling down, and just the difference in fertility rates between the immigrants and the locals suggests that a replacement of populations is inevitable. It is a simple mathematical calculation to predict future demography given current trends. Of course some whites will remain, but if things continue in this direction then they will become a minority in their own lands sooner or later. Also, how many of them will convert to Islam or will be in any position of influence when they become a minority is questionable.

You are misrepresenting here the allies during WWII. You are actually trying to claim that the Russians were more humane to you Germans than were the Americans. Similarly, there are many Germans who claim otherwise, and apparently many German soldiers, civilians, and even Jews released from the concentration camps were scrambling towards the wests at the end of the war as they preferred to surrender to the US, Brits, or French rather than to the Russians.

In fact they were all just allies with a common objective to defeat Germany. If you think that Stalin and the Russians decried the bombings of Dresden and other German cities by their western partners, or felt any sympathy for the victims, you are wrong. In fact Stalin had long been urging the western allies to step up their campaign and ease off the pressure on the Red Army and he also wanted to minimise casualties of the Red Army on the march to Berlin.

Here you are denying “Teutonic” genes and then exhibiting stereotypical Germanic character traits, screaming blue murder at anybody who disagrees with you, threatening to kill and imprison those who don’t share your views, endlessly ranting on about the victimhood of your nation, exhibiting extreme verbal aggression, all reminiscent of one German Fuhrer, and even telling me in a previous comment “Germans are known for calling a spade a spade and rubbish rubbish”, so acknowledging that even your bluntness makes you different from those who possess different genes to your Germanic ones, and yet you want to engage in matters that require diplomacy, such as negotiating the removal of US troops from your territory, debate serious geopolitical issues, etc. OK, I know you’re not a diplomat but a schoolteacher, but if your nation’s politicians and diplomats, even the non-Nazi ones, exhibit such traits I don’t think you’ll get very far. And I must say I pity your students if that is how you teach. You are not a teacher but an indoctrinator and a bully.

And again in your comment you only mention how US corporations supported Hitler yet you don’t mention that imports from the USSR accounted for between 50 and 85% of all overseas imports into Germany between February 1940 and June 1941.

You are extremely biased, represent only one side of the story, and are incapable of seeing things objectively.

He, who pays the musicians, calls the tune. As a glaring example, I can mention “free” MSM in the US.

OAS is another clear example of this age-old wisdom. Disregarding all legality, it recognized that Guano person as “president”. Mind you, Mexico, Bolivia, and Nicaragua did not. Brazilian military explicitly stated that they are not prepared to invade Venezuela, despite hot air from current Brazilian president. In addition to the usual suspects (Russia, China, etc.) many countries recognize Maduro as the only legitimate president. These include even Indonesia and NATO member Turkey (where Empire-organized coup failed not so long ago). Looks like Guano is supported by the same “the whole world” with about one billion residents that supports current regime in Ukraine and Syrian jihadists, but not the countries inhabited by the remaining six plus billion people. I don’t know about you, but as far as I am concerned, this tells all I need to know.

BTW, according to polling, approval of many US presidents was pretty low many times (say, Trump’s low was 35% in December 2017, and this is not the record low). Macron’s approval was 24% in 2018. May’s approval is now at 30%, with 51% disapproving. How come neither we nor France or UK ever have a new election when leader’s approval gets low? If we call our, British, or French system democratic despite that, what’s undemocratic about Maduro?

Neither the word “kill” nor the word “imprison” occurs in the article to which you immediately responded.

I’m not bothering to read her ramblings carefully, and apparently neither are you, but she does indeed mention it quite a few times in her various comments, as #563 noticed, and a good job she’s only a teacher and not a judge as she’d be dishing out life sentences for next to nothing, and most of us here would be locked up with the keys thrown away. It makes you wonder why she’s always emphasising her “courage” in not going incognito in forums such as this – obviously she can string her words together thoughtlessly without having to worry if she may not write something, even accidentally, that contravenes whatever sensitive PC laws are currently, or will be in the future, in force in her country.

when a Hitler comparison is made …. whoever made the comparison loses whatever debate

You think she’s worth seriously debating. So I could have compared her to a left-wing commie kapo in a concentration camp charged with brutalising other inmates, and some have blamed them, and not the SS, for the excesses of the camps in comments on this site.

And by the way, many of those “stereotypical” German character traits I mention are not exclusive to Germans, and anyway I do find them alluring in some Germans who know how to carry them well. And hey, I don’t particularly dislike Germans, and I don’t want to see them either under American or muslim rule, but neither do I want to see them ruling others or have to put up being hectored by them as by this Anja.

You are right, and you don’t have to care. Put politicians who do have a way of solving this. Most in charge are engineering society in such a way so that their own white people do not reproduce at replacement rates. Hitler had a solution to this, as do Orban and Putin. And please let’s not have outrage that I am now calling Putin and Orban as some new Hitlers. Hold your horses, as they say – many in these comments are so trigger happy.

Maybe she’s one of those that’s OK if you don’t talk politics with her. And to think she was raised in a democratic society. I was going to add a “free speech” society but it seems that’s no longer a component of democracy.

Others are fine to talk politics with but not religion.

And some you have to be careful with even if you discuss football or other sports.

In some pubs you’re better off just zipping up and sticking to enjoying your beer.

I hope they’re not sending undercover PC enforces and thought policemen into real pubs these days, or you’ll just have to drink at home while watching crap on TV. Imagine telling you wife “Hey luv, I’m off to the pub for a few, be back by midnight”, and then as the alcohol loosens your tongue … next thing you know you’re doing hard time with a bunch of muslim rapists and terrorists because of a vicious and nasty Anja type lurking about with her mobile phone switched on “record”.

Yes indeed, Marx was no philosemite. On the other hand, if you read Nietzsche carefully on the Jewish question, you will see that he wasn’t an anti-semite. It was so long ago that I read him but I remember getting the distinct impression that Nietzsche actually admired the Jews.

Excellent article but

on some matters there’s an overwhelming consensus among Jews and it’s decisive in shaping important policies.

All of the financial, political, and media power of the Jewish community is pushing in one direction only: the replacement of Western populations. Millions of Jews and, in effect, one opinion.

Is this a misrepresentation, and is it necessary to put it so emphatically?

What about anti- Islamic and anti – immigrant Jews such as Pam Geller, Robert Spencer, Milo, Rebel Media, Breitbart, the counter-Jihad movement, and the many Zionist supporters of Tommy Robinson?

I myself am anti-Zionist and anti-globalist, so in a somewhat confusing position since I can see muslims as allies on many issues, even someone as unsavoury as Roosh V, but wouldn’t it be fair to give some credit to those Jews and Zionists who are vocal and active in their anti-immigration and anti-Islamism, especially since being a supposedly oppressed minority they attract less censure and condemnation from the authorities and the main stream media than white activists, at least in an article dealing with Jews, Islam and immigration?

I get the impression that there are far more muslims in the UK, France, Belgium, Netherlands, and other European countries than those figues you quote would indicate. I would think most people live in cities in urban societies, and we’re being told how in many towns and cities muslims (and/or immigrants) are becoming a majority, or at least approaching half the population, and when we see so many schools where whites are a small minority, when we’re told statistics about newborn babies, and the fact that there are many undocumented illegals, temporary residents awaiting permanent status, UNHCR refugees, then those official percentages quoted on a nationwide basis seem gross underestimates.

I have been mistaken for such in the past. No I never lived in South Africa but I get my information from websites and that documentary “Farmlands”.

Thanks for the history lesson, I see you have your own slant on things. I’m tired of debating the same issues again and again, and having to repeat my own views, so I’ll let someone else respond to your interpretations, if anyone else can be bothered. I can’t say I disagree with everything you say, and as long as you keep your national pride within bounds all power to you in recovering your country.

Actually I’m not American but I get the drift, you like to make all debate personal so you can fling your ad hominem attacks. Anyway I’m glad that Germany lost the war so I don’t have to learn German.

Are you trying to show us how brainwashed they all are?

And how in debt they all are taking out loans to pay for those college degrees? Hope they find jobs to pay off those loans they got suckered in to take out.

Still, I’ve got nothing against education in principle – hope they learn something true and useful.

Sites like this would not exist if people could speak their mind and sites like this do exist so people don’t go crazy from cognitive dissidence.

And of course nobody would want to be identified under the real name.

If Hitler had lived before the Koran was written, I’m sure he would have been the next most significant name after Mohammed in the Muslim pantheon of prophets, perhaps even bigger than Jesus. But as Mohammed was the last prophet, Muslims can now admire Hitler only as a secular leader of their liking.

Don’t these Jews who promote the Muslim invasion know that most Muslims adore and love Adolf Hitler? After all their reasoning is that if Hitler had done his job properly they, and Palestine, would not be having all these problems with Jews (what I mean is that most muslims believe that Hitler’s plan was to annihilate the Jews and not to resettle them in Palestine).

” Then get your fat bottoms to the only territory you have a right to be”

In Germany right this day you can go to any public area and view endless amounts of “Fat bottoms” , endless numbers of obese Germans strutting their fat-asses around such as in any typical American shopping mall.

Secondly : You are a vile crazy cretin.

AJM

In fact, if you come to know that someone sins in private, you are supposed to cover their faults and not divulge their secret unless they publicly do such acts.

I’m not sure about this. That’s the whole point of the religious police and in Muslim countries people do indeed inform on their neighbours, and out of spite, jealousy, or just to make trouble, and even on complete innocents, and it is for the religious police then to investigate or dismiss the allegations. I know they need four witnesses so it’s easier to convict if the transgression was done in public, but I’m not sure how this is applied in different countries, and if for example recordings in video and audio formats are considered as valid as the eyes and ears of witnesses, etc. And anyway you’d be surprised how much corruption there is among the religious police and some of them tend to be most immoral and sinful, and of course the rich and powerful can get away with a lot that ordinary common muslims cannot, because of bribery or just their connections to those in control of the power structures, not to mention those who are the ruling elite who are beyond all laws, religious or secular. And rumour, hearsay, and gossip are widespread in muslim societies and are often investigated by said religious police, not making it a very healthy society, in terms of mental health.

OK, maybe it wasn’t just traders that spread Islam to those countries you mention but neither did the Arabs replace the local people. Senagal people are definitely still black African, while the CIS peoples are mostly Asian, and if anything more mixed with Russian Slavs than with Arabs.

I reiterate that I prefer to see people maintain their own cultures. If I go to a muslim country I expect it to be muslim, and even though I may not like much of islam, I wouldn’t want them to abandon their religion and culture for something else, and I never agreed with Christian missionaries past or present, especially when they used violence during the colonial phase to convert people. But I definitely don’t appreciate muslims now becoming new missionaries and spreading their religion and culture to other nations with their immigrant invasion, and would therefore probably be considered an islamophobe by the liberal mainstream, or at least make a common stand with islamophobes whether I like them personally or not, or agree with many of their other political views. I could accept Islam in a few isolated pockets among the dominant majority culture but not the way it’s going on, growing and growing with no or little fightback. And in some respects I do wish modern day Europeans were more like muslims but not by converting to it or accepting it as a major factor on their own turf.

You seem to think that now Germany wants to stop this and start deportations, but I don’t know if you can take politicians for their word. Merkel herself said some time ago that multiculturalism isn’t working but soon after she started importing the refugees. Blair, Sarkozy, Berlusconi and Obama seemed to make peace with Gaddafi and accept him into their club of world leaders, and then suddenly turned on him to open the immigrant flood gates he was guarding. Assad wants the refugees back but will the western leaders comply and send them back, by force if necessary? So trust politicians at your own peril.

Yes, we have to wait and see how this plays out. And don’t forget the strong influence of Jews on how this will play out.

Peter,

I haven’t lived in the UK for almost 30 years and I only occasionally visit, or other western countries, and every time I go I am more shocked by how it looks. Sometimes, when I read what is going on there, I just can’t believe it, I just can’t believe to what extent free speech and free expression have been suppressed for the majority (except of course for the gays, muslims, Jews, degenerates, and perverts whose freedom of expression has gone through the roof), or the extent of the growing decadence, perversion, and degeneracy, the propaganda lies, the social decay, etc. I really don’t know how it’s at all possible, and have to pinch myself to make sure I’m not in some nightmare dream-world. Of course, as I don’t live there, I read about it all on websites, or watch on videos dissenters put out, and I sometimes wonder if it’s all really real and happening or is it not just some fiction made up by imaginative bloggers and vloggers spawned by the Internet. Maybe I’m just getting old and remember a somewhat different world.

I don’t use social media such as Facebook (CIA spy invention and not of some Jew kid that fronts it for them), Twitter, or whatever else, but I’m not that naive not to notice that people have been doxed, persecuted, even prosecuted for what they post there.

I know you can’t really truly hide from those who want to find you in this modern technological age no matter what precautions you take, and I don’t think I’m any big factor to threaten those in power regardless of what my views may be, but I can’t be bothered having hundreds of accounts and trying to remember all the usernames and passwords I may use. I did sign up to that dissenter.com so let’s see if that grows as a genuine free speech platform.

Personally I don’t mind debating with people who don’t share my views, and I think it’s useful to debate with anybody, and it would be a boring, and probably a bad world, if everybody thought the way I do, and anyway I have changed my viewpoints over the years. But yes with some people it’s pointless, like those who do it only so that they have a reason to inform on you to higher authority or set you up to be strangled by somebody else while they assist (haha – funny that one!). And over what – because you don’t share their viewpoint over some footnotes of history or some historical personages?

Seraphim,

It was long ago I read his works, but from what I can remember he was also very critical of Germans, the Germanic mentality, character, temperament, etc. Strange that he should have become a prominent influence on the Nazis. But of course Nietzsche and nihilism are also very popular in left wing and anarchist circles.

Not Richard Spencer of the alt-right who is a goy, I was referring to Robert Spencer of counter-Jihad, a different bloke and he is a Jew.

I prefer thinking about possible solutions.

You’re absolutely right there. But for solutions of any kind there needs to be a large number of people wanting to effect that change. At present, it seems most are more interested in taking it further down the so-called “slippery slope” instead of the other way. They say “be the change you want to see” but it’s more like “be the change you’re told to be”. Any action at present would be suicidal.

In the meantime – “female friends” – good for you if you’re younger, not so attractive in my age bracket.

“Guns” – great where you’re allowed to own them, “self defence” – always good, “information security” – for IT experts.

To end on a positive note. Maybe we shouldn’t feel so despondent about how things are developing with all this liberalism, and if it didn’t exist maybe it should be promoted, so we know exactly who is who. It’s great in a way, they’ve actually done half the job all by themselves already: the migrants have congregated in their ghettos, the refugees are in their asylum centres, the perverts and degenerates are showing themselves for exactly who they are and where they can be found in their clubs, the gays have come out of the closet and hit the streets, lists have been compiled of the millionaires, billionaires, bankers, media moguls and their celebrity playthings, where they all live, work and play – it’s all good, more than good. All that is needed is for some men in uniforms to turn up with dogs and weapons and starts laying the barbed wire around their ghettos and asylum centres, turn up at their pride parades and start marching the participants and their adoring fans off to the reeducation camps, turn up at the addresses of the high and mighty and start decorating lamp-posts with them. So just let that invisible army that will do the job needed to effect that change and rid society of this “spiritual pollution” in a great purification grow patiently and silently, observing, watching, and preparing.

This one isn’t interested in any public protest – she’s an agent of the establishment, clear as daylight, an infiltrator in any public protest sent to derail it, even a peace protest, by locating any potential “right wingers” and so divide while others, her masters, rule. I suppose she’d be doing the same in any BDS activities and pro-Palestinian marches, as to her anti-smites are worse than Zionists. She’d be more interested in suppressing your religious right to wear in public your holy symbol, the swastika, if you happen to be a practicing Hindu or Buddhist, than to mount a protest against her German industry and government supplying submarines to Israel to load with their nuclear missiles for the “Samson option” aimed at her own country.