RSS“Appeasement” can only be viewed as a “massive screw-up” if one views its opposite — the British aggression which began WW2 and resulted, after much slaughter and carnage and cultural destruction, in the collapse of the British Empire and the present control of Britain by a hostile elite steadily extirpating the traditional inhabitants of Britain — as a massive success. We are instructed to so view the situation by today’s Establishment, but it is odd to find that position declared incontrovertible in this forum.
It would be preferable for Barack Obama to transgaymarry Jenner and forge an unstoppable transraciogendral politico/”reality” dynasty. The possibilities are endless. In one episode, for instance, Michelle could have gender-reassignment surgery to become a woman, then ciscopulate with Kanye, who could record a song about it, etc. Your plan involving O.J. Simpson has a compelling narrative logic to it, but mine will provide leaders for our nation for the foreseeable future.
Since the death of Robert Giroux, the only straight white male left in publishing is Haven Monahan.
A few questions:
Is the incoherence of the comment by ABN an instance of “wrecking”? It seems so.
Could the push/pull courtship of the Jews adduced by this and recent previous essays by you, Steve Sailer (not to be confounded with you, Andrew Marvell), possibly have any positive outcome?
It’s hard to know what that would look like. Jews realizing they’d been wrong all along? recognizing that their ethno-tribal instincts that had seemed so successfully self-preservatory for so long were in fact terribly destructive of the one nation in human history which had (inanely) welcomed and accepted them? perhaps moving beyond a general apology for the societal-fabric-rending nature of their recent decades-worth of group endeavor to a more specific apology for their insistence on specific falsifications of their and our history, faux memorials to which are under continuous construction?
That all seems unlikely.
Might it not be more realistic to consider whether the debacle is not in fact what is intended? The dissatisfaction, real or fabricated, of a few can have no arguable standing, one would think, beside the genuine satisfaction that the chosen must have at seeing a hated culture, ours, in irreparable ruin. As a great man once said, “As a lone ant, from a broken anthill, from the wreckage of Europe: ego scriptor…”
Jonathan Chait is not a white male. He is a Jew. His friend Hanna Rosin is not white. She is a Jew. Each of them knows this to be the case. It’s essential that readers struggling to come to an understanding of the contemporary world separate from the Narrative also come to understand this fact of identity as always central to the issue at hand, whatever it might be.
I tend to think that they both feel very White indeed while driving through a Black neighborhood.....
Jonathan Chait is not a white male. He is a Jew. His friend Hanna Rosin is not white. She is a Jew. Each of them knows this to be the case. It’s essential that readers struggling to come to an understanding of the contemporary world separate from the Narrative also come to understand this fact of identity as always central to the issue at hand, whatever it might be.