RSSYeah, VDare stayed away from the JQ. Derb never brought it up. Coulter never did. Steve Sailer is an ass-kisser of the Jews and fully supported Jewkraine and condemned Russia. Charles Murray in tweets gushed over Jonah Goldberg’s work.
Good riddance VDare.
You’ve got to love it when an anonymous commenter tries to shame troll a married couple with children who used their real names and did real work for 25 years in spite of the obvious risks involved. In short, GFY troll.
Shitposters who shame troll for not Naming The Jew work for The $PLC/ADL/FBI (but I repeat myself). And if not, they might as well be. And even if they’re sincere they still miss the point. And the point is that VDARE did far more than some anonymous commenter to direct attention to the many problems surrounding race and immigration.
They also linked to other websites that did discuss Jewish power and influence, such as Kevin MacDonald’s TOO. And as the article mentioned KM was a contributor to VDARE. In fact, it was through VDARE that many readers discovered his and other websites.
Goetz did not kill anyone, all the four robbers he shot survived but one of them was permanently paralyzed.
My comment #13 was meant to be an answer to you.
Assad was probably the lesser evil but still a dictator for sure, I don’t think these countries can be held together at all without a dictator at the helm.
Maybe he was not really qualified to be an efficient dictator? Not cynical and ruthless enough, etc?
As an opthalmologist who just need a bit of updating after 24 years as a dictator he could soon be an eye doctor with his own clinic in Moscow or St.Petersburg.
How much he skimmed off and got away with is anyones guess but I suppose he can buy a house and hire his own security.
He likes skiing so the wheather will not be a problem, he should learn russian though.
Anyone know the size of his retinue? How many people escaped with him?
Replies: @raga10
Ousted Syrian dictator Assad smuggled $135 billion to Russia — report
11 December, 01:46 AM
Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad transferred $135 billion to Russia, former intelligence officer of Assad’s toppled regime Khalid Beyye told Turkish newspaper Turkiye Gazetesi on Dec. 10.
Beyye stated that the funds were “smuggled out” of Syria; however, he did not provide details on the mechanisms used to transfer such a substantial amount.
...
https://english.nv.ua/amp/ousted-syrian-dictator-assad-smuggled-135-billion-to-russia-report-50473270.html
Yes, plus all the sub-continental Pajeets who came in via legal H1-B visas to take high tech jobs; Haitian pet gourmets granted refugee status; legal asylum award claimants; diversity lottery winners; border jumpers who are legal until their hearings in a year or two if they remember to show up; etc.
Trump says Dreamers can stay …
Sailer believes that Oswald killed Kennedy and even that Oswald acted alone, that is what he says anyway.
I have no time for such people.
Sailer the 'noticer' has never bothered to notice Building 7
I have no time for such people.
If normies really are as stupid as you say («retards») then smart propaganda will have a good chance of influencing them and be effective, especially when considering that this particular propaganda has so much truth in it that lies are hardly necessary.
This film is just preaching to the choir while scaring all the others away so in my view it has a net negative value.
This article started in a really good way but then quickly detoriated so I stopped reading and just glanced over the rest.
«The human race» is a meaningless term, we are «the human species».
The author wants to reduce humanity by almost 80% and genetically engineer new forms of plants to swallow up CO2, plants that would cover our freshwater lakes.
Why would a population of just 2 billion world wide need new nuclear power stations?
Considering that the normal condition of the world for many million years have been ice ages with a +100 000 years duration with some 30 000 years of thawing in between…what are the possibility of a new ice age if the emissions are reduced as much the author wants?
We -the human species- are in a lot of trouble and to just keep on playing God will not help us.
I see that my comment got an «agree» from meamjojo and I wonder if the motive for this agreement is to embarrass me?
After all: he would not want Peters to remove the man with the swastika necklace in order to keep some hope of «reaching and waking up normal people» as I wrote would he?
Very recently I tried giving some friendly advice to ghali on how to not alienate Europeans from his cause but he just called me «a fucking idiot» and «a savage and unconscionable Jew».
That response was not unexpected from an Arab but Jews are supposed to be so smart are they not?
From 5 minutes and 38 seconds we are meant to listen to a man wearing a swastika necklace, if the producer had any intention at all of reaching and waking up normal people the possibility of doing so evaporated right there.
So Palestine is all that matters?
You would welcome a nuclear attack on Britain with millions of people dying even as Israel has an even bigger supplier of arms just across the ocean?
My advice is to keep this evil and counterproductive ethnocentrism hidden, it reminds me of a Talmudic Jew who only considers his own people to be real human beings.
Better still: throw that mentality on the scrapheap and open your eyes.
RFK's confirmation hearing could be earth-shaking. I hope so. You know, beyond the 200 pages on AIDS and AZT, there are hundreds more pages in Kennedy's book about COVID and mandatory lethal injections, crimes of the exact same modus operandi as AIDS, and I wonder: will anyone in those confirmation hearings bring up the topic of COVID on national television? Will any senator dare invite Kennedy to speak uninterrupted about the criminality of the COVID hoax, the lethality of the Pfizer injections? Will there be discussion of blood clots, strokes and "sudden adult death syndrome" on national television? Which senator will dare breach the criminal enterprise of COVID?After so many thousands of competent physicians and thousands of superbly credentialed scientists have been censored and even destroyed professionally, will the senators dare let the ugly truth be broadcast worldwide on everyone's favorite source of misinformation?> No, I expect that the hearings will focus mostly on Kennedy's marijuana arrest fifty years ago.Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @Norwegian Troll
Is anybody going to bring up the topic of HIV/AIDS at the confirmation with the tv cameras and the audio recorders?
Marijuana?
He was arrested for possession of heroin in 1983.
I still hope he gets the chance to rock the boat…
I’m worried Mr. Unz will lose credibility by endorsing this topic. AIDS therapy has grown into a cornerstone of medical science.
Look, you—along with probably 95% of mainstream people—would automatically regard anyone questioning the official HIV/AIDS theory as an obvious lunatic. But since the NYT+WSJ was making such a huge effort to portray RFK Jr. as a health-lunatic, isn’t it extremely suspicious that they would avoid mentioning the 200 pages he’d written promoting exactly that theory?
“The Dog That Didn’t Bark.”
This is a shrewd observation.Why don't they? I think it's because for them, Covid is the big one that has to be defended and they don't want to have sections of the public seeing the striking parallels between the Covid hoax and the, for now, more widely believed hoax and extortion associated with HIV.BTW, for me, this and the associated book, is pretty definitive:https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/interviews/pcr-pandemic-interview-with-dr-claus-kohnlein/
But since the NYT+WSJ was making such a huge effort to portray RFK Jr. as a health-lunatic, isn’t it extremely suspicious that they would avoid mentioning the 200 pages he’d written promoting exactly that theory?“The Dog That Didn’t Bark.”
That LBJ sacked RFK as AG after the murder of JFK is not true, RFK resigned on 2 September 1964.
This article states that Johnson «removed him after the assasination» but gives no date, truth is he remained on the job for more than 9 months and left the position to run for US Senate.
This is copied from somewhere else, but it can't be right.
The victim, Mary Pinchot Meyer, was the secret lover of JFK. And she was much more than that. I want to emphasize to your viewers that this was much more than a sex thing. They were very, very close as friends and confidants. And they actually knew each other since they were teenagers. They met at a dance when they were just teenagers and had intermittent contact throughout their adult lives.
Mary Pinchot Meyer: born 14 October 1920, so she was 15 when JFK turned 19 on the 29th of May 1936.
15 years, 7 months and 15 days to be precise.
I read that book, the author Peter Janney grew up to suspect his own father -who was also CIA- of involvment in the murder of his late best friend’s mother.
Angleton was the godfather of all her 3 children.
Yeah, missile expert and MIT professor Ted Postol (BS, physics, MIT; Ph.D., engineering, MIT), who was former scientific adviser to the Pentagon and scientific adviser to the Chief of Naval Operations on missile systems & technology, disagrees with your take.
Video Link
According to Prof. Postol, the Russkies’ advanced military and missile technology is fuh real. 👊🏻
They can be momentarily sated, but cannot be "happy". A pride of lions reclines in the shade after devouring a kill. Are they "happy". No. They swap stories of their part in the chase and kill, of how tasty a portion of the body they gnawed and gulped down. They regard a Ukrainian much as a lion does a gazelle.Replies: @Norwegian Troll
"I hope Sullivan, Blinken, Nuland, as well as John Johnson, Carney and other similar paid trolls are happy with all the death and mayhem they have promoted, with the thousands of young men dead, and with the complete and total destruction of a country."
You are right but I would never compare them to a pride of lions, a pack of hyenas would be more fitting.
Political will has nothing to do with people. Politicians can and will do whatever they want, public opinion makes no difference.
Further, I think that even if Trump actually tried to do this, America does not have the political will. If people see one video of some woman crying while she’s ripped from her kids and thrown in the back of a black van by soldiers, that will be the end of it.
Irrespective of whether soldiers actually rip a mother from her kids etc., Hollywood will fulfill its duty by providing footage of such and the MSM will present those images to the viewing public. In today’s terrifying world, the simulacrum is all that matters. It doesn’t even matter whether things work correctly. Just try to rectify a problem over the phone. Computerized customer service is truly a Kafkaesque nightmare world.
We live in a hall of distorting mirrors. Everyone is borderline insane; not by nature, but by design. A powerful Force makes men (and women) malign, or mal-alligned. Good people try to keep relations cordial. Bad people connive to exploit this willingness. Something is terribly wrong. I can sense it but cannot articulate it but can point to TV and the hand-held phone/computer as the ultimate source.
The pocket computer/phone has been the greatest destructive force that the world has ever seen. The people who evolve in conjunction with this device are aliens. They represent the “fruiting body” of an alien invasion. They are the unwitting hosts for alien thought patterns. They are the vectors for the propagation of a crippling parasite, one that devours its host’s brain from the inside out.
Bill Gates et al. are not human beings. They prey on human thought. Confused thoughts are food to/for them. Clear thinking is indigestible for them. Clear thinking is transcendental. It is not confined to the material world and is therefore not substantial enough to eat. Confused thinking dwells in muck. It is constrained. It is substance. Bound. It is the fruiting body of a mold, one that springs out of rotting culture and personal corruption.
A clear thinker knows his past and is connected to it. He is a tree, rooted in the soil of his past, muscular in the body that projects his mind, the crown, towards light and heavenly clarity. Striving for the Light, his mind embraces Logic and numerical reasoning. Plato knew this. As did Pythagoras, Parmenides, Newton and countless modern scientists.
It was not the first Trump administration that «goaded the Saudis to intervene in Yemen» but the second Obama ditto.
From March 2015 this intervention was massive and in the open, almost 2 years before Trump took office.
And I’m not sure how much goading they really needed, if any.
Why not use one of the many real photos from the time?
That picture is AI and it’s easy to spot, just look at the hand touching the mattress at the front, 6 fingers and no thumb…
Your argument about «who cares about 1500 years ago» is not valid as Sharia is basic law in many Muslim nations to this day, so the horrible practice continues.
IMPORTANT: Talmud is even worse, not 9 years but «3 years and 1 day» and unlike the Sharia the Talmud was originally supposed to be secret and hidden from the world.
«The first homosexual Secretary of State»
Marco Rubio is a married man with 4 children.
Anglin should show some restraint, a lot of people might take his edgy humour as facts and then get annoyed when realizing it was just a joke.
For a while I believed all the stuff he wrote about Lindsey Graham…
REICHSPOGROMNACHT was the official name for it in Germany at the time.
LOL!
The faggot Israeli soccer fans got cocky and forgot that they were surrounded by able-bodied men rather than women and children. They must have panicked when they realized that calling in airstrikes wasn’t an option to get them out of trouble.
The attacker in Rotterdam is clearly an African but how do you know he is a Muslim?
As far as I know that scumbag has not been identified and is still on the run so his possible religion is anybodys guess.
Are you guessing?
If you had to bet your life on it, who do you think this murderous African negro is: a Christian or a Muslim? "Oh, but they ALL aren't bad!" Yes, I know, but this one is. Dollars to doughnuts, the scumbag is Muslim just like nearly all the other violent immigrants now living in Europe are Muslim. Only a bleeding-heart fool would think otherwise. It's long past time to stop playing games.
As far as I know that scumbag has not been identified and is still on the run so his possible religion is anybodys guess.
Thanks for that story about your prime minister — I really like her use of ‘nazi’ as meaning very strict, or not soft. That was the aim of the National Socialists within the party. Here’s a story for you: According to architect Hermann Giesler in his memoir, when touring Paris with Hitler in 1940, the Fuehrer said of the famous Opera House facade: “Certainly it is very decorative, partly too rich, but naturally corresponding to the style taste of that epoch. Planning our architecture, we will aim at a classicism of stricter, sharper forms, according to our character.” Yes, the German character flourishes under strict conditions. Your prime minister could as well have said “We are rather German on this matter” but that wouldn’t have been nearly as much fun as what she did say.
I’m glad you’re here, Norwegian Troll. Your comments have been refreshingly original so far.
Heysel and citizenship: 32 Italians, 4 Belgians, 2 French and 1 British from Northern Ireland but all of them were Juventus fans and afterwards some damn T-shirts appeared stating «Liverpool-Juventus 39-0».
Fighting over football is something of the most stupid I can think of but this here thing in Amsterdam was way beyond hooliganism as such, it was international politics in a big way.
I believe it was more or less planned as it obviously plays into the hands of the «counterjihad» part of the right wing, I have been part of that scene myself but in later years tried to take a step back and see the larger picture.
It really helps.
Christ, what a moron.
I can’t believe Unz platforms this retard.
Not true, as proven by the great popularity of the "Zio-Nazi" label, directed at Israelis and their allies. In fact, any group that is seen as lording over a weaker group, no matter the color, is subject to having their name hyphenated with '-nazi.'
Nazi and racist are merely euphemisms for “white.”
Clearly false for the same reason as above -- there are 'nazis' all over the world now, of every creed and color, but all supposedly patterned on the original German "Nazis."
As for the the term Nazi, the only people referred to as such in the present day are whites, regardless of their ancestry (English, Irish, French, Italian, Polish, etc)
In early October 2020 there was a debate in the norwegian parliament about differences between how much executives earn in the private vs public sectors.
Our Prime Minister at the time -Erna Solberg- stated that it’s only natural that public leaders make less and that her government would not allow big increases in the pay of her top underlings, then she actually said from the main lectern of the Storting: «We are rather nazi on this matter».
A lot of reactions followed and she quickly apologized, explaining her use of the word as a slip of the tongue as in everyday norwegian it can be a synonym for hard and merciless.
This is true, like some youngsters describing a teacher or parent as a nazi will (mostly) just mean very demanding and strict.
«My gym teacher is such a nazi» etc.
Hmm. She forgot the "we have three beautiful children" part of the tradwife thing.Replies: @Hulkamania, @theRealHun
"I met my husband when I was 25. I dropped out of university, got involved with drugs and drinking too much, and my self-esteem was at rock bottom.
One night I ended up at a party with people I didn’t know and someone slipped something in my drink and I lost all memory until the next morning when I woke up on the sofa in a strange man’s apartment. He had rescued me and taken me to his place. I didn’t leave his flat for three months, except to be taken out to dinner and sent off to a gym to get back in shape.
We got married a few months later and are still very happily married 15 years later. In terms of looks, he is a 10. In terms of intelligence, a 10, in terms of being a nice guy, an 11.
He has a job that pays well and we have a really nice lifestyle. I haven’t worked since I met him and I like that. He cooks, cleans and books our holidays. He even sends me off somewhere warm in January because I get depressed in the winter.
I get teased constantly by my friends for being a totally kept woman."
One night I ended up at a party with people I didn’t know and someone slipped something in my drink and I lost all memory until the next morning when I woke up on the sofa in a strange man’s apartment. He had rescued me and taken me to his place. I didn’t leave his flat for three months, except to be taken out to dinner and sent off to a gym to get back in shape.
The plot twist should be that it was this guy who drugged her.
The slur «nazi» was originally used in the 1920s by followers of Marxism to obscure the fact that here was a Nationalist party also claiming to embrace Socialism in various ways.
That Goebbels tried to take ownership of this particular «N-word» makes no difference.
Actually, in history it’s been pretty common for what were originally slurs to eventually become the accepted term for a group or movement.
For example, “Quaker” was originally an insulting term used for the Society of Friends, but eventually everyone used the term “Quaker” for that religious group, and almost no one uses the formal name.
Similarly, about a century ago, “black” was the insulting term directed against the American racial group that called itself “Negroes.” But eventually, “black” became the neutral term everyone used for many decades.
So while I don’t doubt that “Nazi” may have originated as a slur for the NSDAP members, it’s pretty clear that not long after they had come to power, it had just become a fairly neutral term, that they themselves sometimes used. My guess is that it was a sort of edgy slang term, something like “Yank” that they obviously didn’t use in official documents.
Another possible analogy might be the term “gringo,” originally used as an insulting Hispanic term directed against whites. But lots and lots of whites, including committed White racialists, often use that term to describe themselves in an edgy, somewhat ironic or humorous fashion.
A similar example - the Greeks. The term is widely used since the time of the Roman conquests (2nd c.BC), it did not exist before Aristotle and Alexander (or at the time of the Trojan battle), it is also used in oxymorons (e.g. Minoan Greece). It is now the official name, but the Greeks do not like it and often avoid using it. Another example - the Germans. They don't even know the meaning of the term that others use for them, and neither of them know who gave them those names.
Actually, in history it’s been pretty common for what were originally slurs to eventually become the accepted term for a group or movement.
Actually, the claims you make about the term "Nazi" are factually incorrect, and anyone can easily verify that fact.
Neither the term nor any of its derivatives were used within Germany. Anyone doing so might face serious consequences.
The slur «nazi» was originally used in the 1920s by followers of Marxism to obscure the fact that here was a Nationalist party also claiming to embrace Socialism in various ways.
That Goebbels tried to take ownership of this particular «N-word» makes no difference.
If traditional lefties ask «Are you a nazi?» the response: «I am not a National Socialist because I am not a Socialist at all» will provoke them in a most fundamental way and I advice anyone thinking of using this response to be prepared for physical violence.
Carolyn Yeager -elderly or not- appears to be a real person advocating her NS ideology under her own real name and I consider this to be very brave even as I mostly disagrees with her from behind my nick.
The genuine Socialist part of it died in 1934 with the fall of the Strasserite faction and any attempts to resurrect Hitlerism today will just be a dangerous burden for any kind of White Advocacy.
I consider your website much like an oasis in the desert and I check at least the headlines almost every day.
What do you think would happen if you just answer - yes.? In America, the question is usually, are you a racist? Again, answer - yes.
If traditional lefties ask «Are you a nazi?» the response: «I am not a National Socialist because I am not a Socialist at all» will provoke them in a most fundamental way
Indeed. And, she should prioritize her method of using her intuitive insights to coax people along. I personally feel that her strength lies in that area, as well as in her immense factual knowledge. I certainly admire her pluck and forthrightness.
Carolyn Yeager -elderly or not- appears to be a real person advocating her NS ideology under her own real name and I consider this to be very brave
Well, the (western) world is a much different place today than it was in 1933. How can we unburden White Advocacy today? Where do you find significant White Advocacy outside the internet?Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
any attempts to resurrect Hitlerism today will just be a dangerous burden for any kind of White Advocacy.
If by genuine socialism you mean communism, then this is true. But of course the NSDAP was never meant to be communist.
The genuine Socialist part of it died in 1934 with the fall of the Strasserite faction and any attempts to resurrect Hitlerism today will just be a dangerous burden for any kind of White Advocacy.
Actually, in history it's been pretty common for what were originally slurs to eventually become the accepted term for a group or movement.
The slur «nazi» was originally used in the 1920s by followers of Marxism to obscure the fact that here was a Nationalist party also claiming to embrace Socialism in various ways.
That Goebbels tried to take ownership of this particular «N-word» makes no difference.
«In 2020, Trump should have ordered the military to implement martial law and audit the votes.»
Anyone here believe the military would have obeyed such orders?
Precisely. Which is why there was no "insurrection" on Jan 6th.Anyone who has lived in a State which has recently gone through a coup knows that it takes powerful military backing to pull one off. All the nodes of power must be seized in a co-ordinated program: TV stations, critical railroad stations, major airports, power stations, key bridges, Parliament buildings and the public square surrounding them, the major Courthouses, important crossroads, border crossings etc. You'll know it's real when on every major intersection in the nation's capitol city stands a soldier, in uniform, armed with a machine gun. You can distinguish them from the old order by the new shoulder patch they wear and an insignia on their cap.And Dems have convinced half of America's population that the marcher's through the capitol building, armed with American flags, were doing just that.I'm surrounded by idiots.Replies: @Emslander
"Anyone here believe the military would have obeyed such orders?"
Based on the words and actions of Miley and Vindman, it is likely the US military establishment would not have obeyed President Trump's orders. Trump knew this, that's why he didn't act.
Anyone here believe the military would have obeyed such orders?
When living in decent, successful White societies, both jews and blacks do their damnedest to tear down these societies.
Muslims, overall, are not any better than blacks and, with them seeped in their infidel-hating “religion,” are often times worse. Look at how much damage Muslim immigrates, and their violent, raping, pimping, drug-dealing, thieving, ISIS-loving offspring have done to England, France, Germany, Belgium, Sweden, Nederland, and elsewhere.
The prime example of the disaster of Muslim immigration are the Pakistani rape gangs who were given carte blanche, for decades, to rape and pimp thousands of English school girls up and down the English Midlands. The cops turned a blind eye on all this because, unbelievably, they were afraid of being branded as racist Islamophobes if they did their job and stopped it. Their rationalization went: “These girls are low-class Paki-shagging sluts so who cares.”

https://www.sanskritimagazine.com/uks-worst-ever-child-grooming-scandal-exposed-upto-1000-young-girls-raped-by-pakistani-grooming-gangs/
I am eternally grateful that my parents “mutilated” me. Women vaaastly prefer mutilated men, for very good reason. The preference ratio is 99 to 1.
When you live in a society where the overwhelming majority of men are lacking a foreskin, then, yes, most women will think that a man with a normal (complete) sex organ is weird or even “dirty” when they encounter one, because the cut version is all they have ever seen or heard about and so they are biased right from the get go.
I recall reading the opinion of a female Dr. in Egypt who said that un-cut females are dirty and disease-prone. “Normal men” – and they all circumcised over there – don’t want them.
Food for thought, maybe.
Oh, also, FGM(to which I'm unutterably opposed) bears no relationship to male circumcision.
Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the cause of almost all cervical cancers. Women with circumcised partners were protected against any HPV...
“fabricated lies”
no, I think Odyssey has got this one right.
Croats and Serbs really, really detest each other.
and with good reason.
Serbs in particular – a vicious tribe of Mountain Bandits posing as a nation – are the scum of the earth.
Replies: @Dumbo, @ThreeCranes, @Wokechoke, @Commentator Mike, @anonymous, @Norwegian Troll
At the height of the Roman Empire, about 10% of the empire’s population was Jewish, although the bulk of them were converts. Some Khazars were also incorporated during this period. It also explains another of the team’s findings ” that the population most closely related genetically to European Jews are Italians. ruthfullyyours.com/2010/06/05/on-genes-and-jews/“Of the three Ashkenazi founders, K1a1b1a and K1a9 were most likely assimilated in west (perhaps Mediterranean) Europe Overall, we estimate that most (>80%) Ashkenazi mtDNAs were assimilated within Europe. Few derive from a Near Eastern source, and despite the recent revival of the ‘Khazar hypothesis’, virtually none are likely to have ancestry in the North Caucasus. Thus at least two-thirds and most likely more than four-fifths of Ashkenazi maternal lineages have a European ancestry. Despite widely differing interpretations of autosomal data, these results in fact fit well with genome-wide studies, which imply a significant European component, with particularly close relationships to Italians. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806353/
“Richards and his team claim that maternal lineages did not originate in the Near or Middle East or the Khazarian Caucasus but rather, for the most part, within Mediterranean Europe. Another twist in the findings: Jewish women may have been assimilated in Europe as far back as 2,000 years ago—earlier than most other studies have projected. The researchers believe the DNA could trace back to the early Roman Empire, when as much as 10 percent of the population practiced Judaism, many of them converts. Overall, they claim, at least 80 percent of Ashkenazi maternal ancestry comes from women indigenous to Europe while 8 percent originated in the Near East, with the rest uncertain. geneticliteracyproject.org/2013/10/08/ashkenazi-jewish-women-descended-mostly-from-italian-converts-new-study-asserts/“Loco-LD confirms and sharpens the lack of evidence for the Khazar hypothesis observed in PCA, placing the Ashkenazi Jewish sample in close proximity to Italian Jews, North African Jews, Sephardi Jews, and Mediterranean non-Jewish populations such as Cypriots and Italians. In brief, judging from the similarity of the membership proportion distributions (Figure 4), Admixture demonstrates the connection of Ashkenazi, North African, and Sephardi Jews, with the most similar non-Jewish populations to Ashkenazi Jews being Mediterranean Europeans from Italy (Sicily, Abruzzo, Tuscany), Greece, and Cyprus. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25079123/“During Greco-Roman times, recorded mass conversions led to 6 million people practicing Judaism in Roman times or up to 10% of the population of the Roman Empire. Thus, the genetic proximity of these European/Syrian Jewish populations, including Ashkenazi Jews, to each other and to French, Northern Italian, and Sardinian populations favors the idea of non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestry in the formation of the European/Syrian Jewish groups and is incompatible with theories that Ashkenazi Jews are for the most part the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs. The genetic proximity of Ashkenazi Jews to southern European populations has been observed in several other recent studies. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3032072/
So Koestler put the number of Jews in the Roman Empire at 6 000 000?
I think that is really interesting.
So because I don’t support the National Socialist ideology you call me a ZOG apologist?
Whether or not you support NS ideology or not makes no difference.
It is evident from that mountain of misinformation that you’ve posted in the past that you’re a ZOG apologist.
I suspect that you’re one of these dumb Norwegians that has been brain-washed with pro-NATO claptrap*, which has prevented you from learning TRUE history.
(*I’m pretty sure you’re siding with that poisonous dwarf Zelensky and his Judeo-Ukrainian regime in their proxy war with Mother Russia – a war which ZOG orchestrated and which Putin did everything in his power to resolve peacefully).
And, on the matter of true history, you won’t do better than to read John Wear’s book ‘Germany’s War’, which is available to read for free here in the UR:
https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/
Get back to me once you’ve educated yourself – because it is clear that your mind is filled with the indoctrination from your faulty Norwegian school system.
BTW, what’s with the ’14 must get rid of 88′ B.S?
What is the significance of thee numbers?
So because I don’t support the National Socialist ideology you call me a ZOG apologist?
This makes me even more certain that 14 must get rid of 88, not just because you are evil but also because you are so incredibly and monumentally stupid.
Whether or not you support NS ideology or not makes no difference.
So because I don’t support the National Socialist ideology you call me a ZOG apologist?
No, I just meant to point out that the modern state of Israel has the same kind of laws.
I used to worry a lot about Islam and their Sharia but in later years I became aware of what the Talmud actually teaches…and that unlike the Sharia the Talmud was supposed to be secret, after this I find it much easier to be polite and even friendly towards Muslims and most other minorities.
Like: «Hey, it’s not really your own fault that you are colonizing my country, I will treat you as an individual if at all possible»….(this is not even a joke).
I don’t really blame Jews either btw, I blame my own people even as I love them.
It’s getting late here so I won’t respond to anything for many hours.
When king Haakon VII was awakened by his adjutant that very early morning on April 9th 1940 and told that Norway was being invaded his first response was asking «By whom?»
The answer came, «The Germans your majesty», upon which the king replied «That makes everything so much easier»
I was not alive at the time but please consider this:
Germany makes a deal with the Soviet Union to divide Poland between them, then Germany invades Poland and Britain and France declares war on Germany within a couple of days.
A fortnight later the Soviets seize «their» part of Poland but now no war is declared by Britain and France even if the reason for their war on Germany ostensibly is to protect Polands independence.
Does this seem like a trap or not?
Then at Barbarossa the trap falls, Germany is now in a two front war and have already spread her forces from the Arctic to Crete and Roosevelt have just been re-elected on a program to make the US the «arsenal of democracy».
NS Germany was 6 years old when this war started and 12 when it was lost, literally like a child compared to powers with centuries and even milennia of experience in…whatever it should be called.
Manipulation and Dark Arts comes to mind.
As far as I know Israeli Jews are forbidden to marry Gentiles, so I think Israel has learned a lot from Germany in the 1930s.
Banning an ethnic group from breeding with the others and limiting their rights to work in certain professions are persecution for sure although nothing like extermination.
My point was that the left and the rulers (not the same in my opinion) tries to link any expression of White identity with NS ideology, the purpose is that it shall not be possible to claim 14 without 88 following and I would want people to agree that 88 in practical terms can easily get in the way of 14.
Die-hard 88ers often have the same interest in making these causes inseparable but I wish they would hold back, just consider how common White racial consciousness was not that long ago and if this should come back it’ll better be widespread among most people even if we might disagree on other issues…like the economy, views on history and so forth.
The average man from «The Greatest Generation» had views on race and nation that would make them classify as more or less «pure nazi» today but still they risked their lives to destroy the enemy they were pitted against.
I have little interest in quarreling about these matters btw.
This is akin to complaints about 'zionazis'. It only serves jewish interests.
so I think Israel has learned a lot from Germany in the 1930s.
If you deny NS persecution of Jews as such you deny the existence of the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, if so you are the first one I have ever encountered.
That’s like saying the US persecutes illegal mexicans. Do you think we should have open borders?
As far as I can see, all ideologies are cruel and heartless. That’s because their essence is to put abstract principles ahead of all human considerations. Hence the sour old joke that “Everything that is not compulsory is fobidden”.
“Unless a man has talents to make something of himself, freedom is an irksome burden. Of what avail is freedom to choose if the self be ineffectual? We join a mass movement to escape individual responsibility, or, in the words of the ardent young Nazi, “to be free from freedom.” It was not sheer hypocrisy when the rank-and-file Nazis declared themselves not guilty of all the enormities they had committed. They considered themselves cheated and maligned when made to shoulder responsibility for obeying orders. Had they not joined the Nazi movement in order to be free from responsibility?”
– Eric Hoffer
One of the main rules of any ideology is that it must not be questioned, challenged, or given up. The Koran, for example, lays down that any adult Muslim who abandons the faith MUST be killed – that becomes the solemn duty of every adult male Muslim. I suppose it is not always done – especially in non-Muslim countries – but any mercy is shown by people. The ideology is uncompromisingly harsh.
What is the purpose of an ideology? To give people fixed, unchanging rules for living. Sane, healthy people do not benefit from such rules.
By the way, if anyone thinks that we are free from ideologies in “the West”, they have not thought it through.
Have you ever researched for yourself the nature and actual evidence of "NS persecution of Jews"?
I have never met or even read about anyone denying the NS persecution of Jews in itself.
Can you elaborate on the first point, that "National Socialism was a cruel and heartless ideology"?
I don’t have to know the fate of Jews and Gypsies and so on to call National Socialism a cruel and heartless ideology even as it had some good parts in it, I can elaborate on that last point if asked to.
If you deny NS persecution of Jews as such you deny the existence of the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, if so you are the first one I have ever encountered.
NS cruelty and lack of heart (as already stated): Aktion T4, killing the unfortunates of their own people like that requires total monsters at all levels…from the leader at the helm to the doctors and nurses doing the actual killing.
One palm leaf: If taking for granted that (minus the bears and eagles etc) all of the official history is simply true, with the industrial scale killing of women and children, then the one important question to ask is simply WHY? Why did the Germans freak out like that?
Some years ago the then president of the Philippines Duterte said on TV that: «The Germans killed 3 million Jews, right? The Philippines have 3 million drug addicts and I would like to kill them.», this was presented as a clear sign of madness in the norwegian MSM but they conveniently avoided the simple question of numbers, that 3 millions are not 6 millions.
One can argue that presidents of nation-states might know things the general public don’t, but I have little further to add in defence of my own view on NS Germany, after all it invaded Norway and that is unforgivable.
That's like saying the US persecutes illegal mexicans. Do you think we should have open borders?
If you deny NS persecution of Jews as such you deny the existence of the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, if so you are the first one I have ever encountered.
Most «normies» in the West will still take any kind of Holocaust revisionism as an attempt to exonerate or at least minimize the evil nature of National Socialism.
I am now thinking (apart from the fact that my homeland was invaded and occupied even as she tried to remain neutral) of the way Germany at the time time treated the very weakest of her own people, patients of psychiatric institutions and others killed under the T4 euthanasia program which to my knowledge is never disputed by anyone.
Few revisionists take the trouble to deny the mass shootings in the early stages of the German attack on the Soviet Union, Babij Jar and so on, and I have never met or even read about anyone denying the NS persecution of Jews in itself.
So revisionism is something of a trap, that the number 6 000 000 has become a kind of theology to separate the believers from the heretics is obvious to me but I don’t have to know the fate of Jews and Gypsies and so on to call National Socialism a cruel and heartless ideology even as it had some good parts in it, I can elaborate on that last point if asked to.
After the debacle with the «40 beheaded babies» last year more and more people might suspect that the official number of Jewish civilian victims during WW2 has been grotesquely overstated, but how to argue for this without seemingly advocating for the resurrection of «Nazism»?
For White advocates Holocaust revisionism is a minefield if not simply a giant trap, on the other hand it can probably be a key to important future developments…please just understand that many people will take an argument like «it was 1 million, not 6» (even if they believe in it) NOT as the disclosure of a gigantic swindle but as minimizing the sufferings of that 1 million.
I am open to many opinions and arguments on different issues but the NS ideology should be seen as a ship that left the harbour in 1945 and then sank at sea, how to keep this ideology apart from exposing the various lies of the victors is a big problem imo.
Have you ever researched for yourself the nature and actual evidence of "NS persecution of Jews"?
I have never met or even read about anyone denying the NS persecution of Jews in itself.
Can you elaborate on the first point, that "National Socialism was a cruel and heartless ideology"?
I don’t have to know the fate of Jews and Gypsies and so on to call National Socialism a cruel and heartless ideology even as it had some good parts in it, I can elaborate on that last point if asked to.
Wrong! The ideology is still alive and kicking, assuming the Nazi ideology consists of 2 pillars: ethnic/racial superiority over inferior "subhumans", be they ethnically, mentally, politically inferior and who ttherefore need to be killed.
the NS ideology should be seen as a ship that left the harbour in 1945 and then sank at sea
“if you dehumanize them as insects or animals, if you speak of squashing them or cleansing them as if they were pests or bacteria, then you can much more easily arrest them, deprive them of rights, exclude them, or even kill them. If they are parasites, they aren’t human. If they are vermin, they don’t get to enjoy freedom of speech, or freedoms of any kind. And if you squash them, you won’t be held accountable”
I’ve read at least 100 comments that describe Palestinians in that fashion.
And most everyone seems on be on board with it.
Mia Khalifa is Arab like practically all people from Lebanon and the only official language there is Arabic.
Sowell sees everything through an African American prism. How does he explain the fact that low IQ Sub-Saharan Africans are importing violence and criminality across Western Europe despite there obviously being no link between them and white American southerners?
The official number of jewish citizens of Lebanon is 29 and they would probably not hide in banks associated with Hezbollah.
Correct me if I’m wrong:
Debt-free boomers would not be financially liquidated by a sudden rise in the federal funds rate to 20% or even more, their properties would be safe.
Of course such an increase would make many companies go bankrupt and their stock value fall to zero but as long as there is no dept involved on the stockholders side it would be a clean loss and not necessarily mean their own ruin.
Their houses would be safe.
Also shocking to see how many so called educated people are claiming to not know who Leon Degrelle is. The West is in a pitiful fucking state.
Zgharta is a stronghold of the Marada Party.
Marada is a Christian party which is strongly opposed to Israel’s defacto allies, ISIS and Al-Qaeda terrorists.
Accordingly, Marada has a political alliance with Hezbollah, because Hezbollah is an enemy of ISIS and Al-Qaeda terrorists.
Marada leader Suleiman Frangieh is Hezbollah’s preferred candidate for president of Lebanon.
I think this is the reason why the Jewish state is meting collective punishment on the people of Zgharta.
If you had asked me a week ago, “Which Christian region of Lebanon will Israel target first?”, I would have correctly guessed Zgharta.
By striking the Marada stronghold of Zgharta, Israel is helping ISIS and Al-Qaeda.
Leftist morons tried to obfuscate this simple fact, claiming it is … a Christian triumphalist war …
In defense of the Leftist morons, there are plenty of evangelical zionists around to support this thesis. Although not “triumphalist” in a normal sense, but to somehow force the Second Coming (which is even crazier – as if you could somehow “force” God’s hand).
UNIFIL have been «interim» since March 1978.
More than 22000 countrymen of mine served in UNIFIL before Norway pulled out in the late 90s.
I have heard many stories from and about soldiers who went to Lebanon with a basic pro Israel view and came back disillusioned or with the exact opposite view.
21 norwegians did not come back home alive.
Send them off to Donbas, Jewkraine for a year and they’ll come back with the same mega-crush affair on Putin that Anglin has.
I have heard many stories from and about soldiers who went to Lebanon with a basic pro Israel view and came back disillusioned or with the exact opposite view.
Four score and ten?
Then QUIT SMOKING Mr Anglin, you are two score now and even gaining a lot of weight would be better than keeping up such a deadly and filthy habit.
Otherwise the statistics will be strongly against you.
This article is good but Mitterand was president 1981-1995, not 1985-1995.
The first sentence of the article: «Pierre-Alain Cottineau: Your standard homosexual.»
Then it goes on to tell the story of this «standard homosexual» adopting a handicapped little girl and filming himself molesting and raping her.
Why do you consider this to be an attack on male homosexuals as such UNLESS you agree that those hideous crimes represents a standard trait of typical «gays» whether they live it out or not?
I agree that Anglin is somewhat hysterical on this issue but what is the issue?… adults having sex with each other or the rape of children?
You state that homophobes really are closeted homosexuals and that might be so but here is a suggestion from me: So called «bottoms» (submissive homosexuals and also most bisexual men) would have grown up to be heterosexuals UNLESS molested in childhood.
I am very interested in what you think of my theory.
OK, but you wrote that the chinese authorities will never legalize buggery between men and that this is because the chinese are not christians.
My comment was just to make the point that it was legalized in 1997.
It was removed from the list of psychiatric disorders in 2001.
Incorrect sentence.Homosexuality was the hidden corner-stone of so-called "Holy" Roman Catholic Church that was founded 2000 years ago.White-majority Christian countries now openly allow Homosexualism and Homosexual-Marriage-System.The majority people of the People's Republic of China are not Christians and, therefore, we do not see the Chinese govt. legalizing Homosexualism and Homosexual-Marriage-System.Similarly, we do not see Indian judges legalizing Homosexualism and Homosexual-Marriage-System in Indian territories since India has never been a Christian-majority country.America govt. says that, America was founded on Judeo-Christian ideal(s), where White Christian Americans worship a dead-Jew as their "Savior" who -- White Christian Americans fervently believe -- would redeem all sins of White Christian Americans for bombing millions of non-Christians in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Cambodia, Afghanistan, et cetera.So, as long as Christianity (i.e., Jew-worship) prevails on earth, Homosexualism and Homosexual-Marriage-System will not be hindered in Christian-majority countries of Western Europe and North America.White Christian judges of Western Europe and North America allow Homosexualism and Homosexual-Marriage-System.That is the fact as well as sad reality."Homosexual-Marriage-System" in America is due to the United States Supreme Court’s Christian justices such as Anthony McLeod Kennedy (i.e., a White Christian Irishman) and un-restricted abortion (i.e., willful murder) of unborn defenseless humans in America is due to Sandra Day O’Connor (i.e., a White Christian Irish last-name again!).Governments of the People’s Republic of China or India as well as any Muslim country on earth do not officially or legally promote Homosexualism like America and many other Christian-majority countries do.When Christianity (i.e., Jew-worship) was formed in the European continent, homosexuals found their refuse in Catholicism as late Professor Morton Smith of my Alma Mater expounded on this subject in his famous book “Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark” (1973) where Christian idol Jesus the Nazarene allegedly engaged in homosexual activities with a young and tender Jewish boy named Lazarus!LINKhttp://www.dawnhorsepress.com/images/products/sample/SecretGospelAppendix.pdfIn the State of Californication, the majority of voters rejected “Homo-Sexual Marriage System of America”; but, Christian judges in the State of Californication forced “Homo-Sexual Marriage System” on all residents of that State.Marriage (i.e., matrimony) is a social construct that is as old as human civilization where only a biological male and a biological female unite with their body, mind and soul -- until natural death does them apart -- for the propagation of human civilization with pleasure and procreation as well as conjugal family-life.But, in Christian-majority countries the opinions from majority of judges overrule all historical, social and biological traditions while in Muslim-majority countries -- where world’s 2 billion Muslims follow and revere a notorious Arabian pedophile as their prophet -- Islamic jurisprudence allows polygamy, child-marriage (i.e., pedophilia) and sex-slavery as “Divine sanction” from fictitious Islamic Allah!Replies: @Face_The_Truth, @Norwegian Troll, @anarchyst, @Pierre de Craon
Andrew Barrett Anglin writes:Aside from a few outliers in the Middle East, every government that is aligned with the U.S. has socially normalized homosexuality. Meanwhile, no country aligned with China has done so.
Homosexual conduct was decriminalized in China in 1997.
Please keep us Neanderthals out of it.
The warrant issued is a yellow one, not red.
So Rinson Jose is not wanted for arrest because he is not charged with any crime.
He is a missing person last seen entering the US at Boston Logan International Airport.
Why quotation marks around the word rape?
Don’t the New York Post recognize rape as an actual thing?
That Taiwanese firm -Gold Apollo- claims that those pagers were produced under license by another firm …in Hungary.
Daily Stormer have updated the article to mention this claim.
I have mentioned this before but please allow me: She looks so much better lately that I refuse to believe she is a vegan anymore.
What do you think?
The claim that the victims in Christchurch were «all adult men» is yet another example of the sloppy way Anglin often deals with simple facts, it’s a shame he is so inaccurate because he is really good with words as such.
The youngest victim in Christchurch was 3 years old.
She looks much more healthy than before, rounder cheeks and bosom, not a vegan anymore?
This article is about the possibility that Candace Owens is allowed to remain on YouTube in order to discredit herself and by extension dissenters in general.
That would be Enoch the Peadophile?
When Enoch Powell
Those allegations are new to me and this is kind of strange, why have they not been spread far and wide to smear his name? When that is said: your links seems interesting and I will look into them.
Was he right about immigration or not?
Ireland didn’t exploit the “others” and were never a colonial power so why on earth are they being flooded with unwanted aliens? Answers on a postcard please…
Time and again polls show that the vast majority of people in the UK think immigration (legal as well as illegal) has reached insane levels and needs to stop and this was also true more than 50 years ago when it was just a trickle compared to the present flood.
When Enoch Powell made his so called «Rivers of Blood» speech in 1968 he clearly had the majority on his side but was removed from the shadow cabinet by party leader Heath the very next day.
The simple fact that government policy do not reflect the general opinions of the masses is a clear indication of «democracy» mostly being a swindle, in a real democracy Powell would have been PM from the year 1970 and probably well into the 80s.
Calling «islamophobia» racist tells me that this author either has no understanding of what the term «race» means or that he denies the existence of races within the human species.
The latter implies that «racism» simply means hate by one group for another, this is one of the most stupid definitions I can think of but in Norway it is more or less the official one.
Few people know that Virgil, just like the Aeneid, was an Etruscan. This statement is an anticipation of the upcoming genocide that the Latins committed against the Etruscans and destroyed almost all cultural assets and replaced their (Serbo-Trojan) language with Latin. The Etruscans are considered the creators of Western civilization, and it would be interesting to hear if anyone knows if the Etruscan script has been decoded?
As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see 'the River Tiber foaming with much blood'.
https://youtu.be/y2uKkle8CYo
At the crack of the dawn thunder and lightning crossed the way
The shadow of knight waited to see the bright light of the day
Nobody saw his bitter tears through the dark veil of rain
The river of blood under his feet run wild again and again.
That would be Enoch the Peadophile?
When Enoch Powell
Excellent observation. Let's go back to the original meaning of the word ‘rasa’ (race). Just like the words ‘vampire’ and ‘vandal’ in comment #41, RASA is a primordial Serbian expression for single-tribeness, single-bloodness and single-kinness. This primordial word is preserved later in the English language in the expression RACE, meaning absolutely the same.
Calling «islamophobia» racist tells me that this author either has no understanding of what the term «race» means or that he denies the existence of races within the human species.
The latter implies that «racism» simply means hate by one group for another, this is one of the most stupid definitions I can think of but in Norway it is more or less the official one.
«He was at the very first event, immediately after the stabbings…»
No he was not, Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon/Tommy Robinson held a very big meeting in central London on Saturday 27 July…then he was arrested, released and went to Cyprus.
The stabbings was on Monday 29 July, the first rioting took place the day after and at that time Robinson was already enjoying his holiday in the sun, tweeting…
I disagree as I really like The Smiths.
Still: The perfect soundtrack would be «Warhead» by U.K. Subs.
“I’d like to condemn these mindless thugs, attacking innocent men who are asylum seekers. They have been there for months and we have not had any issues or problems. They have been in a place of safety….It’s sickening to think they are being targeted because of their race or their religion, and I hope this isn’t tied with the disgraceful scenes in Southport where a mosque was attacked last night.”
Stopped reading right there.
Mr. Goad and cuckolds like him are the cause of western countries’ ongoing and accelerating collapse. He his fellow Beta male simps aid and abet the replacement of whites in their native lands with their willful betrayal of their own people.
I can’t put in print what should be done to Mr. Goad and traitors once the current paradigm collapses, but they will have to be addressed, afterward.
The latest news says it was a bomb hidden in the apartment he used and not an airstrike.
Looks like Anglin reads the comments here on Unz and in this case wrote a whole new article to clarify his view, I like that.
The simplification of complicated issues that I mentioned is actually the great strenght of the Daily Stormer’s way of presenting said issues imo, and the other thing: I think it was Stalin who said «quantity is a quality on its own»…he was probably right, just think of a pack of hyenas killing a lion.
The notion that smoking is not dangerous is just too much though.
«The last time China was involved in a war was in 1979 when they sent troops to Cambodia to protect the Cambodians from a Vietnamese invation.»
Not to my knowledge, no.
When Vietnam sucessfully invaded Cambodia to dispose of the Khmer Rouge China attacked Vietnam from the north and was soundly beaten, I don’t think there was a single chinese soldier in what was then called Kampuchea except the guards and consuls attached to their diplomatic mission.
After the vietnamese victory and occupation the western powers allowed Pol Pot to wage a guerilla war from inside Thailand and also to retain Cambodia’s seat in the UN for more than a decade, this was because the Soviet Union supported Vietnam and was considered the main adversery in the cold war.
So whenever someone uses Pol Pot/Khmer Rouge as a the ultimate example of communist mass murdering maniacs they are of course right, and maybe they need to hear that they STILL had the support of not only China but also the US well into the 90s…it is called realpolitik and realpolitik mostly means murder.
I digress.
Anglin often over-simplifies complicated issues and mostly this works well, my advice to him is that «quality over quantity» would be a smart rule for his publishing from this point forward.
The important words in his comment are «slightly» and «chance» and a man is not a liar if he actually believes in his own words…he can be wrong without being a liar.
No need to be rude and people should vote if they think it will make a difference.
If Trump had been killed last saturday and various groups had celebrated in the streets some enraged MAGA people shooting at those crowds could certainly have set off a lot of further violence that would spread far and wide.
Still I think you are right, not because of age and obesity but because the great majority of Trump supporters are law-abiding and live in suburban and rural areas, I can easily see them taking defensive action at some point like blocking off their own areas but not «burn the country down», not without a lot of escalation over time.
That bystanders saw the gunman several minutes before he started shooting and that they alerted security personell who then did nothing should by now be considered far more than claims.
Some of the statements from authorities after the event sounds insane to me, like the one about police having to wait for clearance or for the suspect to open fire before responding to the clear and present danger from that subject…and that there were no Secret Service on that particular roof «because it was too steep»…COME ON MAN.
It’s 2024 and we’re reading an article complaining that voters are irrational in how they choose who to vote for.
I think this fact has been know for at least a few hundred years to everyone.
Why support a candidate just because his wife was run over by a bus or because his baby died of cancer? That’s sad, but it doesn’t change the man’s politics.
I dunno, man. You have one candidate, Biden, who is a brain-dead walking corpse who might be the worst President in many decades. And you have another candidate, Trump, who survived an assassination attempt despite either a colossal failure or complicity of Secret Service on Biden’s watch. Now, why the fuck would people prefer to vote Trump over Biden in this situation? Truly, it is so puzzling. It’s a mystery that might never be solved. I don’t even know where to begin trying to guess why that is.
Not between 200 and 300 yards but somewhat less than 150 yards, some 400 feet according to CBS…around 130 meters.
Hitting a standing target with a head shot from a lying position at that distance is not very difficult in itself but this was not the calm safety of a shooting range and we don’t know how used he was to the gun and what substances might have been in his blood etc.
To repeat myself: Seems to me he was allowed to have a try and then immediately killed upon failure.
The witness interviewed by BBC told us the most interesting story so far imo.
Looks like TPTB let the shooter have his chance and then immedeately killed him upon failure, whoever he was…
By now it should be obvious to everyone that 7 October was an Israeli False Flag. There was no attack by Gazan Arabs. The Israelis attacked themselves because Netanyahu would have been finished.
«Sure, by totally ignoring the Mossad and LBJ angles, Stone’s film was lacking.»
I repeat:
I remember from the movie Garrison shouting in court «a coup d’etat, with Lyndon B Johnson waiting in the wings» while the judge bangs his club on his table, so this aspect was not covered up as such neither in reality nor in the movie.
I’ll admit I’ve only watched the Stone film twice, the last time several years ago, but I don’t remember the statement in that particular scene and even if you’re correct, I don’t think it impacts my analysis. For example, lots of liberals believed that right-wing Texas oil millionaires were behind the assassination and since they were all friendly with LBJ, they obviously would have preferred him in the White House. But that doesn’t mean that they believed he was involved.
Everyone in the JFK conspiracy movement regarded the assassination as a “coup d’etat” and since LBJ was VP, he was obviously “waiting in the wings” so that hardly suggests that LBJ been one of the conspirators.
And you seem to have totally ignored the remainder of the paragraph in which I’d made that claim:
Johnson never received even a hint of suspicion in Oliver Stone’s Oscar-winning 1991 film and a closely-related book endorsed by that famed director took a similar position. Col. L. Fletcher Prouty had been an important Pentagon official during the early 1960s, serving as liaison officer to the CIA, and he became intensely suspicious of the circumstances of his President’s death. Prouty’s theories inspired Stone’s film for which he served as a technical advisor, while his real-life role in that drama was played by Donald Sutherland. In 1992 Prouty published JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, with Stone providing a lengthy, glowing introduction, hailing the author as a historic figure. I recently read that book, noting that the author similarly blamed the killing upon elements of our national security “Deep State” while devoting relatively little attention to Johnson, who was portrayed as a completely innocent bystander.
Stone glowingly endorsed Prouty’s 1992 book, which was the basis for his film. And Prouty explicitly portrayed LBJ as a completely innocent bystander in the assassination.
This is exactly why I prefer to focus on books rather than videos. The amount of their content is usually 100x greater and its much easier to locate statements and references rather than debating the meaning of an ambiguous phrase made somewhere in a three hour movie.
As I understand it he is escorted by Australia’s UK ambassador who will follow him all the way home to the land of Oz.
Sure, by totally ignoring the Mossad and LBJ angles, Stone's film was lacking. But it was obviously vastly superior to all the others.
The Parallax View, never seen it. As for Executive Action, what do you think the Texas oilmen part was supposed to imply?...
I disparaged it in comparison with Stone’s JFK, so to repeat that back to me is a cheap mode of rhetoric.
However, those who have a fanatical interest in the assassination also find the Stone film to be severely lacking.
«Sure, by totally ignoring the Mossad and LBJ angles, Stone’s film was lacking.»
I repeat:
I remember from the movie Garrison shouting in court «a coup d’etat, with Lyndon B Johnson waiting in the wings» while the judge bangs his club on his table, so this aspect was not covered up as such neither in reality nor in the movie.
And:
Considering Mossad as the one and only cloak and dagger instrument of a totally monolithic Israel is a position I would advice against, strongly.
See my comment #134.
I'll admit I've only watched the Stone film twice, the last time several years ago, but I don't remember the statement in that particular scene and even if you're correct, I don't think it impacts my analysis. For example, lots of liberals believed that right-wing Texas oil millionaires were behind the assassination and since they were all friendly with LBJ, they obviously would have preferred him in the White House. But that doesn't mean that they believed he was involved.
«Sure, by totally ignoring the Mossad and LBJ angles, Stone’s film was lacking.»
I repeat:
I remember from the movie Garrison shouting in court «a coup d’etat, with Lyndon B Johnson waiting in the wings» while the judge bangs his club on his table, so this aspect was not covered up as such neither in reality nor in the movie.
Stone glowingly endorsed Prouty's 1992 book, which was the basis for his film. And Prouty explicitly portrayed LBJ as a completely innocent bystander in the assassination.
Johnson never received even a hint of suspicion in Oliver Stone’s Oscar-winning 1991 film and a closely-related book endorsed by that famed director took a similar position. Col. L. Fletcher Prouty had been an important Pentagon official during the early 1960s, serving as liaison officer to the CIA, and he became intensely suspicious of the circumstances of his President’s death. Prouty’s theories inspired Stone’s film for which he served as a technical advisor, while his real-life role in that drama was played by Donald Sutherland. In 1992 Prouty published JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, with Stone providing a lengthy, glowing introduction, hailing the author as a historic figure. I recently read that book, noting that the author similarly blamed the killing upon elements of our national security “Deep State” while devoting relatively little attention to Johnson, who was portrayed as a completely innocent bystander.
Unit 8200 is usually consideret part of Aman, or at least subordinate.
You confirm my point: Putting any organ of israeli state power in the same bucket and calling it Mossad will not be accurate and in the 60s there might have been groups formed and disbanded that very few today are aware of ever existed.
At the time humint was still more important than sigint, at least considering operations like killing heads of state and blaming it on a lone nut acting on his own volition.
Just after 41 minutes the editor says that LBJ was spared the slightest suspicion in Stones film «JFK» but I clearly remember Garrison shouting «…with Lyndon B. Johnson waiting in the wings…» at the (movie) trial, with the judge frantically clubbing his desk in the backgound.
I took it for granted at the time that this was a word for word reference to the real trial.
Also: To always refer to israeli intelligence and security organs as «Mossad» is an over-simplification that may be counter-productive, Israel has a military intelligence service called «Aman» that by far surpasses the Mossad when it comes to personell and resources in general.
Aman is integrated in the military and answers to the Minister of Defence while the head of Mossad answers directly to the Prime Minister.
Israel is clearly riddled by factions and deep divisions and I think the editor is wrong when he seem (in earlier podcasts) to take for granted that Netanyahu by necessity would be «in» on the IDF (maybe) letting october 7 happen to get a proper casus belli.
The true nature of the deep state concept is not that the Prime Minister is fully or even partially oriented about big events and black swans coming…decisions might be taken in some office few have heard about and the (figure-)heads of state might be presented with a fait accompli and instructions about what to say and do.
The one thing Stone certainly never touched was the israeli dimension, with Dimona in the background.
William Engdahl is cited as writing: «When Carter took office in January 1976…»
Carter obviously took office in january 1977, american presidential elections are always in november of leap years, then the winner or «winner» takes the seat the following january.
This is a small mistake in itself but I wonder if it was made by Engdahl in his book or if it’s a typo by the author of this article?
We are all getting older…
Putin took over from Yeltsin in 1999, not «after 2005».
This is clearly a person with no concept of «the enemy’s enemy…» and so on, I don’t finish the sentence since it can be done in several ways.
It is good to see the youth, the far left and a good part of the mainstream left crash head to head with the true rulers of the west, rulers who will be on their side on many issues but simply cannot afford to back down on this one.
I hate that expression about «getting the popcorn», I understand the sentiment but what is presently happening is far too serious…
This isn't even remotely happening, though.
It is good to see the youth, the far left and a good part of the mainstream left crash head to head with the true rulers of the west
Nothing is happening. The popcorn narrative is typical boomer Qult bullshit. "Just watch as we conquer the world without you lifting a finger, goyim!" Don't fall for it.
what is presently happening is far too serious…
Hezbollah and Israel have both prepared and planned for this since late 2006, almost 18 years now.
In that war the israelis eventually chose to de-escalate after attacking the whole nation-state of Lebanon rather than the Hezbollah militia, this lasted some 5 or 6 weeks.
Much easier to terrorize urbanites in Beirut from the sky than defeating an enemy willing to use themselves as detonators from those mountains in the south.
I think mass immigration is inherently disruptive and inimical to indigenous society. It doesn’t matter how nice the people are. Except for extraordinary circumstances, it should be avoided. And even under extraordinary circumstances, the migrants should be identified and eventually returned to their countries of origin.
Immigration should be viewed with the next 100 years in mind. Short term economic gains are not sufficient.
I would like to see enough Europeans convert to Islam for converts to outnumber immigrants. The 25%+ Muslim minority (led by indigenous European Muslims) could revitalize European manners and morals and thereby fix the demographic problem, making it economically feasible to curtail immigration.
Mysticism spilling over from European Islam (European converts are typically interested in mysticism) could spark a revival of Christianity. At the end of the day, religion grows out of mysticism, meaning direct religious experience, and won’t make a major comeback until more people start having those experiences.
At +39 minutes Barrett brings up the point of immigration to Europe in relation to non-muslim sub-saharans and non-observant north africans being more of a problem than religious muslims.
Well, that really depends on what I am worrying about.
If I worry about street crime and various forms of obnoxious behaviour Barrett is obviously right.
On the other hand: If I worry (and I do…a lot) about groups eventually taking over my homeland and replacing norwegians then it is logical to see muslim immigration as particularly dangerous.
Islam is a strong religious and cultural force, muslims tend to stick together against outside pressure and open apostasy is rare, therefore I fear that the multi-cultural Norway of today will be replaced by (more or less) monocultural Islam in the future.
Barrett would obviously welcome Europe «accepting» and «embracing» Islam and consider it a great leap in humanity’s progress but I disagree, I fear it…whether by immigration or conversion.
Describing Israel as a colony of Europe is wrong on so many levels, even more so when this article also says that «Western Europe, long dominated by America, now dominated by Israel,…»
So which is it? Is Israel a moored aircraft carrier for western imperialism or is Israel an important base of a partially hidden network dominating the western countries?
I have a lot of sympathy for the underdog in Gaza and nothing annoys me more than statements about Israel being a spearhead of the west and founded on white supremacy.
They seem to control us (the west) and not the other way round.
Historically, that line of argument has always been most aggressively pushed by (((Trotskyite))) socialists and various other Jewish lefties, such a Gnome Chomsky. Needless to say, they are merely covering for their Zionist cousins while shifting the blame onto Scofield-bible Christians, who have been duped into--proudly!--taking all the blame.
... nothing annoys me more than statements about Israel being a spearhead of the west and founded on white supremacy.
Sabbataï Tsevi eventually converted to islam and died as a muslim.
This thread has so many half-truth nonsense statements and plain nonsense statements. Yours just one of many.Sabbataï Tsevi had to convert or die after his attempt to be a Jewish messiah in the style of bar-Kochba fell apart. His conversion to Islam was much like the fake Christian conversions of marranos and many or most conversos in Iberia. Pure crypsis. Some claim that his relatives and followers had a large effect on later events. That may be true.
Sabbataï Tsevi eventually converted to islam and died as a muslim.
Comment number 135 in this thread, by Dumbo, give us some indication on that matter with a link from friday or saturday…
Barbara Spector?
You probably mean Barbara Lerner Spectre, a friend of the king of Sweden who is now in her 80s and kind of famous for her statements in a certain video from around a decade ago.
It was a good thing that she said what she said, better have it at least partly out in the open.
The article above is useful and interesting to a non-irish, written by one of those brave people who -unlike the two of us- show their face openly and therefore might make a difference.