The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Hua Bin Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir ISteve Community James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Al X Griz Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred De Zayas Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Bailey Schwab Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Britannicus Brittany Smith Brooke C.D. Corax C.J. Miller Caitlin Johnstone Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar ChatGPT Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Harvin Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Courtney Alabama Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David M. Zsutty David Martin David North David Skrbina David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Don Wassall Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens E. Geist Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Douglas Stephenson F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Key Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Ganainm Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gavin Newsom Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgia Hayduke Georgianne Nienaber Gerhard Grasruck Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Godfree Roberts Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Garros Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano H.G. Reza Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugh Perry Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras James W. Smith Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Janko Vukic Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jeremy Kuzmarov Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Mamer Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Atwill Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel Davis Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonas E. Alexis Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jorge Besada Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Correro Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth A. Carlson Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin DeAnna Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marc Sills Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Marcy Winograd Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Battaglioli Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Neville Hodgkinson Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Haenseler Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani R, Weiler Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Raymond Wolters Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Faussette Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Rob Crease Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Rose Pinochet RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Seaghan Breathnach Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Starr Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sybil Fares Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Wyatt Reed Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Austin Metcalf Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betar US Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Canary Mission Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Kushner Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlie Kirk Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colombia Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story Covert Action COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Crypto Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Cole David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Deportation Abyss Deportations Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Easter Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Enoch Powell Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve FEMA Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franklin Scandal Franz Boas Fraud Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom Freemasons French French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Flotilla GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Hell Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Huddled Masses Huey Newton Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Inbreeding Income Income Tax India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA Javier Milei JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Paul Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Miller Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Karmelo Anthony Kash Patel Kashmir Katy Perry Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry Ellison Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Maria Corina Machado Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Immigration Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monopoly Monotheism Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natanz Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Deal New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New Testament New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz Noam Chomsky Nobel Peace Prize Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition Nvidia NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise OFAC Oil Oil Industry OJ Simpson Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palantir Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Craig Roberts Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Petro Poroshenko Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Postindustrialism Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qasem Soleimani Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quiet Skies R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race-Ism Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rare Earths Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Red Sea Refugee Crisis Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romans Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds Roy Cohn RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satan Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Bessent Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Steven Witkoff Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tariffs Tatars Taxation Taxes Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Congress US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US State Department USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Civilization Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Race White Racialism White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Whitney Webb Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zohran Mamdani Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
Mikael_
Comments
• My
Comments
194 Comments • 18,100 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    This is the third book by Andrei Martyanov that I am reviewing, the first one was “Book Review - Losing Military Supremacy: the Myopia of American Strategic Planning by Andrei Martyanov”, while the second one was “Book Review: Andrei Martyanov's The (Real) Revolution in Military Affairs”. I also interviewed Andrei about this second volume here....
  • @Nick Kollerstrom
    The great hope of the Rest of the world is that the US will finally become poor enough that it stops bombing other countries.

    Replies: @Rich, @Old and Grumpy

    You do understand that once the US stops bombing, many others will jump in to fill the gap, right? If the US hadn’t stood up to the invading communists in Korea and Vietnam, how much more blood would have been shed.? Iraq v Kuwait would have just been the beginning of Saddam’s invasions. Israel would be in a constant state of war, maybe even unleashing its nukes. The US is still the toughest guy on the block, and although it has at times been rough, it is still the most benevolent superpower in human history. The ground wasn’t salted in Germany after WW2, the Japs weren’t forced to speak English and change their religion. You guys will miss the US when its gone.

    • Disagree: HdC
    • Troll: mikael_
    • Replies: @jsinton
    @Rich


    If the US hadn’t stood up to the invading communists in Korea and Vietnam, how much more blood would have been shed.?
     
    Rivers of blood would have been saved.

    The US is still the toughest guy on the block, and although it has at times been rough, it is still the most benevolent superpower in human history.
     
    Only a neocon would say such a thing.

    You guys will miss the US when its gone.
     
    They count the days until that happens.
    , @Herald
    @Rich

    Irony used properly can be very effective. Well done.

  • @Peter Akuleyev
    Living in Europe, the comparison of 2020s USA to the USSR of the 1980s looks ridiculous. In the 1980s the USSR was a spent force, Soviet Communism held little attraction even for Marxists, its inability to produce quality consumer goods was an international joke and the obvious inability of the Soviets to keep pace with computer technology was one reason Soviet elites lost faith in their own country. The USA, for all its faults, still strides the world like a colossus. There are plenty of reasons to detest Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Uber, Tesla, Netflix, Starbucks, Microsoft, Nike, etc. but all those brands spread US soft power in a way that the USSR could not (and Russia still cannot). 5 Guys can open a hamburger store in Vienna and get a line around the block. The Soviet Union could send the Bolshoi Ballet on tour. Russia can barely even do that (because in the West the number of people who appreciate quality ballet, or fine arts of any kind, has probably dropped by 75% since the 1980s). The US is still a leader in innovation - where was the Soviet equivalent of Moderna? Boston Robotics? Twilio? Here in the 2020s Russian elites are still desperate to send their kids to American universities. I don't remember many Americans tutoring their kids in Russian in the 1980s so that they could get into MGU. America has plenty of problems, but maybe a little perspective and sense of proportion is needed here.

    Replies: @mikael_

    You are one of those people who really needs to read Martyanov’s new book, it seems.

    I left the US recently, as the societal collapse has become visible (to the astute observer) at least since mid-2017. ‘Spent force’ describes the USA well.
    And Europe won’t fare much better, as they are effectively just a (bunch of) US vassal states, just as all “Western” countries.

  • @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    @Priss Factor

    Russia is on the same path as the rest of the West, the so-called "Soviet Freezer" effect merely delayed their "progress" by a decade or two.

    Replies: @mikael_

    That is a bit of a logical shortcut by you.

    What did bring the downfall of US society:
    The US youth listening to Rock’n’Roll in the 60’s, or the Marxist ‘march through the institutions’?

    • Replies: @Irish Savant
    @mikael_

    The former was a direct product of the latter.

    , @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    @mikael_


    What did bring the downfall of US society:
    The US youth listening to Rock’n’Roll in the 60’s, or the Marxist ‘march through the institutions’?
     
    The people were too doped out/indulged in their orgy of hedonism to notice what was going on around them and so the anti-West ideologues didn't face too much resistance and the resistance that they did face was mostly from the Traditionalists, whom the majority despised as traditional values didn't go well with the spirit of '69.
  • The aftermath of the Soviet collapse in the 1990s is instructive. 80% of Americans believe the U.S. is on the wrong path. But, it’s just a feeling they intuit. They don’t rationally understand the problem, because only 15% of American adults can form a high-level inference from texts. Only about 3% can function at a very high level. Even if a few key decision makers in America comprehended the relevance of previous collapses to our present situation, they could not overcome the political barriers to change course. Both the Congressional Budget Office and the FED have repeatedly warned the Federal Government that we are on an unsustainable economic path, but they get ignored by Congress and the Executive Branch. Both of these organizations have said the political barriers to changing course are unlikely to be overcome. Like the Titanic, there is not much we can do, except hope we can make it to shore or desperately swim for a lifeboat.

    • Thanks: Majority of One
    • Replies: @Jake
    @ruralguy

    Your words need to be framed.

    A society/empire fairly deep onto an implosion/suicide course has about as much chance of stopping the process, and then reversing it, as a boulder rolling down a mountain side has of stopping before its crash. Even if a collection of large trees and rocks can slow and then slightly redirect and slow down that boulder before it reaches bottom, huge damage will be done.

    The coming crash is not just of the USA. The coming crash is not just of Globo-Capitalist-Neo-Liberalism, as meant by a CJ Hopkins. The coming crash is of Modernist Western Liberal secular society.

    That society, which has its birth with the Reformation and indeed is inherent in the Reformation, is primarily about the re-paganization of Germanic peoples and the 'reformed' Protestantized modern Germanic nations (England/UK, Netherlands, Prussia, Germany, etc.) destroying as much of what is left of Christendom as possible.

    It is a replay of pagan (and Arian heretic) Germanic peoples destroying not merely the governmental structure of the Western Roman Empire but also destroying civilization itself, thereby creating the Dark Ages, which were overcome only as Germanic peoples were Latin Christianized.

    That last part is the hardest for The Saker to grasp, much less accept. It means that Eastern Orthodoxy among Germans w0uld have led directly to the same basic problem as has Protestantism (Lutheranism, Anglicanism, Zwinglianism, Puritanism, etc.). If their Christian faith and practice do not actively make Germanic peoples significantly Latinized in terms of theology, philosophy, and high culture, they will remain at heart destroyers of civilization. They will remain Saxons destroying Camelot, Saxons warring against Charlemagne: they will remain Vandals.

    The coming collapse is inevitable, but we cannot know when. It could be simply a larger version of what happened to the USSR. Or it could be as total as what happened to the Western Roman Empire.

    Here is what is certain: WASP culture is the specific Germanic culture most responsible of the perversions of the Modern West and the coming collapse. That is due to the fact that WASP culture was born of Anglo-Saxon Puritanism, which was a specific and vicious Judaizing heresy.

    The British Empire back to at least Oliver Cromwell has been the Anglo-Zionist Empire. The USA is merely the Anglo-Zionist Empire Part 2, or the western ruled Anglo-Zionist Empire, the capital moved from London to DC/NYC/Hollywood.

    Replies: @Majority of One

    , @ben sampson
    @ruralguy

    I do not agree that the political barriers are insurmountable. what it would take is a simple revolutionary action by the people. go into the streets of Washington by the hundreds of thousands, even millions and take down the government if necessary and themselves carry out the necessary changes and reforms

    there are enough precedent for such action in human history and it is urgently needed in the US as we speak. it is the job of, the responsibility in fact, ordinary Americans to take their reality forward by taking over and doing the job directly

    the real law, the basic, undeniable and unchangeable law of any and all nations, is the people in collective action in their society, about their society, making the changes they want in collective action. they make the changes, make it stand and it is the law.

    do Americans know that? they ought to! they ought to know and go out and do the job of rinsing Washington out, changing and saving their country by changing the way it is run into a democracy that looks after them, after the USA and to kick all who have made it otherwise and their supporters out...not forgetting to arrest a bunch of them, the criminal ones and try them on the spot. and if found guilty to execute them right away

    no nonsense about insurmountable political barriers to successfully changing a desperate situation in which all American lives are threatened. there are no such barriers in the face of the collective people's power, which is far far greater than any other social power.

    , @Anonymous
    @ruralguy

    Martyanov missed IT big time..the core issue is IMMIGRATION and its corollary NATION(al) COHESION. Unlike Russia, China and even Israel...USA is NOT a racially, social, cultural HOMOGENOUS NATION..The new Biden regime will approve a massive largest historical AMNESTY for close to 30millions illegal Mexicans..most of them (90%) residing in the border states with Mexico (wtf). This amnesty and its official OPEN BORDER policy with Mexico will be the DEATH NAIL in the traditional AMERICANA, this will legalize 30million people that openly profess allegiance to the Mexican govt, !!! many of them supported BLMANTIFA the burning of the USA Flag and other US govt facilities during the summer of rage (2020). This will give Mexicans and its govt huge leverage over USA internal politics (seccession?), and will remake the american cultural landscape deeply pro mexico and antianglo. Blacks left Africa a long time ago, and there is NO Africa bordering the USA, other non anglo/white minorities had assimilated without bilingual education, dual citizenship and pledging allegiance to a foreign nation (mexico). Will the southern border states RESIST this massive onslaught ..how? will they be overwhelmed into a deep blue dem wave on antiwhite/anglo/antiblack/asian wave.? Will the USA break into regions;..Southwest MEXICAN, deep Mississippi black South, Midwest deplorables, and urban "whitewash" cyber millenians??? can it remain ONE?...IT is more than clear that BLACKS will be the biggest losers politically marginalized, with declining birthrates/high abortion rates, lower labor participations that demands spanish speaking skills... There is already a trend to "mexicanized" blacks..listen clearfully Mexicans in the USA are NOT demanding WORK/Family visas , they are demainding EXPRESS QUICK CITIZENSHIP...

    , @Dayglowd
    @ruralguy

    All empires lash out at perceived, rather than real, enemies, to try to justify their pointless self-adulating existence as they collapse in to irrelevance.

    All empires deceive themselves about their relevance and importance because, quite simply, the original builders of the empire moved to the colonies to secure their existence.

    Those that inherit their ancestor’s success are not alpha or beta people, but the runts and parasitic classes that result from the advantages and success of the founders.

    And it is right that this is how it is. The proles have lived an unjustifiable high life at the expense of those their ancestors conquered and exploited, for too many generations.

    Not only the inept inheritors that comprise the political classes, but the limpid lazy mentally retarded common folk need to be trimmed down too.

    The US is over extended in the WWIII it started against Russia in 2016, and the US rulers exaggerate their effeminate military’s capabilities in just the same way they exaggerate their empire’s relevance by declaring their ‘indispensable’ nature.

    WWIII started five years ago and the US is losing badly without it even developing in to a full blown shooting match. The world awaits its ultimate demise. And with its collapse everyone hopes the UK, Israel and Saudi Arabia will follow it in to the same grave.

    So bring it on! Let the idiots have full rein in DC. Let the US people deceive themselves even more. Let the ridiculous liars like Mike Pompous et al, have their own way. The world awaits their defeat at their own hands with joyous expectation.

    Replies: @Trinity, @Majority of One, @gT

    , @Squarebeard
    @ruralguy


    They don’t rationally understand the problem, because only 15% of American adults can form a high-level inference from texts. Only about 3% can function at a very high level.
     
    Ah, maybe that’s why so many Unz regulars believe all kinds of fantastical nonsense that is completely removed from reality.

    Replies: @Seraphim

  • @ValMonde
    @Mis(ter)Anthrope

    Solzhenitsyn converted into a Russian patriot only late in life. During his American exile, he became the main source of the anti-Soviet propaganda that swept through the West in the 70's and the 80s. He also called for nuking the USSR (Russia). No less!
    There is no bigger liar than the indignant man, wrote Nietzsche.
    A visceral anti-communist, Solzhenitsyn ended up a vulgar liar, spreading exaggerations and falsehoods regarding his gulag experience and the so called years of Stalinist terror. He's the one who came up with the original "50 million victims of soviet communism" hoax. Despite the complete lack of historical evidence to support such number, the "50 million" myth is still in circulation today. It's gleefully thrown around by pretty much everyone. From your garden variety neocon blaming Russia for this and that, to faux-dissidents such as Jordan Peterson and Eric Metaxas, warning us about the evils of totalitarianism.
    In the 90s, Solzhenitsyn had enough of western fagotry and decadence. He returned home, repented and asked for forgiveness. He also wrote his opus magnus "200 years together". Not holding a grudge, mother Russia took back her prodigal son. Putin met him twice and forgave on behalf of Russian people. The damage Solzhenitsyn caused though is still alive and well in the West. And carefully kept so, one may add.

    Replies: @mikael_, @obwandiyag, @kemerd

    Look, the indignant poster, demanding perfectism from everyone, and from Solzhenitsyn in particular!

    So give us your evidence, that
    a) the gulags weren’t so bad
    b) not 50 million (but only 20-30 million?) died victims of Soviet communism
    c) Solzhenitsyn wanted the USSR nuked.

    Also, tell us what about the ‘warnings about the evils of totalitarianism’ is distasteful to you: the warnings are faux, or it’s not really totalitarianism, or totalitarianism also has some overlooked good sides?

    If I may make a guess, towards both you and Martyanov:
    You’re both probably just blind religion-haters, that’s where your dislike of Solzhenitsyn originates from.

    • Agree: Alfred, Seraphim
    • Replies: @TheIdiot
    @mikael_

    Your problem is that you have likely read "Gulag Archipelago" (an episode in history) but not even heard of one and only important Solzhenitsyn's opus magnum: "200 hundred years together."

    "200 hundred years together." is the full story
    "Gulag Archipelago" - is an episode taken completely out of context

    Solzhenitsyn's CRIME is that he gave sold off his country through "Gulag Archipelago",
    but published the true story of "200 hundred years together." after his Vaterland was destroyed.

    as to your a) b) and c) etc. do your research

    a) Gulag was instrumental in building industrial power base of the USSR and defeat of Germany
    b) " The term "repression" can be interpreted in different ways. I limit myself to "political repression", that is, those citizens who were charged with Article 58 of the Criminal Code (counter-revolutionary activities and other grave crimes against the state) and who were sentenced to death or other punishment.

    From 1921 to 1953 there were about 4 million such people. Of these, about 800 thousand were sentenced to death. In addition, we estimate that about 600,000 died in prison, bringing the total number of victims to 1.4 million.

    Do compare this number against millions innocent people who lost their lifes in your endless wars in the middle east or against the total current US prisons population which at any SINGLE given point in time is greater than Stalin's TOTAL number of "repressed"

    c) Communism never existed on the face of the planet Earth. Not in the USSR, not in Eastern Europe or Cuba. No country has ever claimed to have build Communism. Your complete ignorance of the subject of Political Economy reveals you as a fully dully brainwashed average american.
    In order to avoid any future embarrassment, I would suggest you take the word "Communism" out of your dictionary or educate yourself a bit. An easy to start place are Lenin's works on marxists.org.

    Replies: @mikael_, @mwee

    , @ValMonde
    @mikael_

    Wrong guess. Also an unintelligent one. I'm an observant Christian Orthodox.

    Regarding your request for evidence:

    a) is a strawman assertion, so it warrants no response.

    b) I would refer you to the works of Viktor Zemskov, a Russian historian who spent 50 years of his life in various penitentiary, NKVD and ministry of interior's archives, in an attempt to evaluate the extent and put a number on Stalin's political repressions. According to the sourced, verified and credible figures I've seen, as of January 1st, 1950, the Soviet penitentiary system counted some 2,760,095 prisoners ("К вопросу о масштабах репрессий в СССР", В. Н. Земсков in Социологические исследования. 1995. № 9. С. 118-127). Compare this with the 2.3 million US penitentiary population today. Without going into details, according to Zemskov, in total and for the entire duration of the Stalin's reign ( i.e. ~ 30 years), there were ~600,000 political prisoners and ~ 78,000 summary political executions. Sinister as those numbers might be, they don't even start to measure to Solzhenitsyn's astronomical numbers. For a comparison, that's approximately the number of overdose deaths in the US for 2019 (Source: CDC WONDER).

    c) Solzhenitsyn expressed publicly the wish that the US nuke the USSR in a 1975 fiery speech he gave to New York Union workers (if I'm not mistaken). The topic has been discussed on Unz before. Solzhenitsyn idolaters and denialists typically claim that since it was not an open exhortation, he should be given the benefit of the doubt. In fact, he used a more efficient device: a rhetorical question. In substance, to illicit action he asked are you going to wait until the Soviets bomb you or are you going to bomb them first?
    Everyone present at that speech understood immediately what he was talking about. The press reported it the next day. He realized he had gone too far, so he quickly backpedaled:
    “My God, I was not calling for war, the US press distorted it..."(The New World, 1999, N 2, p. 83).

    Replies: @mikael_

    , @Zarathustra
    @mikael_

    Gulags Gulags Gulags!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Oh my God!
    What were those terrifying Gulags?

    Gulags were actually lumberjack camps.
    What they were people doing in Gulags?
    They were cutting down trees, in Siberia and transporting them to Moskva.
    Why?
    Because Russians needed firewood to fire-up their Samovars.
    So people there did have good nourishment (they needed their strength)
    They did work all day, and in the evening they were watching television.

    Replies: @Zarathustra, @Seraphim

    , @ValMonde
    @mikael_

    By the way, what's


    perfectism?
     
    Wasn't aware I was demanding that.
  • It is given to few countries to face a future without any bright sides. Those that have done so in the past, have usually confronted overwhelming external challenges, perhaps compounded by internal difficulties. In the case of the United States today, that is not the case. To be sure, there are external challenges with both...
  • @Kratoklastes
    @Mikael_

    So let's get this straight: you believe that there is no alternative to State structures for dispute resolution, community defence, and the like?

    There's 150 years of scholarship that disagrees with you. Competitive provision of security, dispute resolution and the like is a solved problem.

    In fact the entire Law Merchant worked for several centuries, despite having no enforcement power (especially across jurisdictions). People abided by the directions of this entirely-private dispute resolution mechanism, because if they failed to do so they would suffer reputational harm that would prevent them from doing business.

    That's the key: a variant of the totalitarian 'social credit score', but maintained by multiple competing firms and funded entirely by subscription. It imposes some small obligations for people to do due diligence before signing up - but so does any subscription.

    The entire State institutional edifice relies - quite critically - on fuckwits with a primary-school understanding of the way the world works. That is to say, people who lack the cognitive machinery to imagine that - for example - in the absence of a State monopoly for community defence, entrepreneurs will establish firms that furnish security.

    Those firms will compete: since competition through providing a good value proposition is far less costly than competition through violence, firms will not 'go to war' with each other. (Hint: without a mandatory tax base or zero-premium access to debt markets, the 'most warlike' security firm will be driven to bankruptcy within a few iterations).

    The current market for private security is massive - that should be a hint that the State is failing to furnish security. 'Failing' is actually the wrong term here: it implies they're making an unsuccessful attempt, but they're not.

    If you had anything worth protecting, you would be a fucking moron if you relied on State police forces to protect it. These days if you don't have cameras and an alarm system that links to a private-sector security firm that does have a duty of care, you pretty much don't have anything worth stealing.

    State police forces are specifically indemnified from any duty of care towards We The Livestock: the case law on that goes all the way back to South v Maryland 59 U.S. 396 (1855), so you've had 150 years to become aware of it.

    Some case studies: you can be in the basement on the phone to the police as home intruders are upstairs raping your room-mate, and if the police fail to respond that's not a violation of any professional obligation. (That's the facts-situation in Warren v. District of Columbia 444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981)

    Or you can have a restraining order against an ex-partner, and State police can ignore repeated calls after he kidnaps the kids - and later the ex-partner is killed in a shootout with police and the corpses of your 3 kids are found in his car. (That's the facts situation behind Castle Rock v. Gonzales 545 U.S. 748 (2005))

    Or you can telephone the police about your weird neighbour, and ask that he be investigated because you think there's a very good chance that he's a notorious serial killer. When he kills you two weeks later, the courts later find that the police can't be expected to follow up on your call. (That's the facts situation behind Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1987] UKHL 12, [1989] AC 53)

    So tell me how a competitive market for security provision would result in worse outcomes - bear in mind that these cases set the bar for all subsequent events of a similar nature.

    In particular, tell me what mechanisms private security providers would use to get out of compensation claims if they failed to fulfil their contractual obligations. (Ch 11? Sorry... that's a State doctrine). Imagine the reputational damage that would happen if a private firm breached its contract in a similar way and then failed to abide by a DRO direction to compensate.

    *

    It is a mark of utter ignorance to quote Hobbes; it assumes that man is not inherently a social animal. If Hobbes' thesis was remotely correct and man is vile... why the fuck would anybody expect the people running the government to be of a superior moral type?

    Hobbes was a fucking retard. Leviathan is a piss-poor apologia for the claimed obligation for people to funnel value upwards to the human vermin who seek to rule; the fact that its value qua apologia is why it receives a strong imprimatur from the powerful is lost on people who lack the appropriate wetware.

    Nobody is saying that dimbulbs like you can't continue to give 50% of your output to a group of grasping, conniving cunts who have no obligation to fulfil their side of the contract. Knock yourself out - just don't expect anyone with half a brain to subscribe to the same bullshit.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    In fact the entire Law Merchant worked for several centuries, despite having no enforcement power (especially across jurisdictions). People abided by the directions of this entirely-private dispute resolution mechanism, because if they failed to do so they would suffer reputational harm that would prevent them from doing business.

    So in your whole essay the above quote is the only thing that attempts to handle my central question to you “how do you live in a society without a, just a little bit centralized, system of Rule of Law?”
    And it’s a utopian pipedream, as usual with the know-it-all types.

    To your credit [sic], you even somewhat address the fact that to “suffer reputational harm” is a method that doesn’t scale well, i.e. won’t work in multi-million headcount societies. But your shooting-from-the-hip attempt to solve that with

    a variant of the totalitarian ‘social credit score’, but maintained by multiple competing firms and funded entirely by subscription

    is outright hilarious, as the multiple competing [credit score] firms worked so well in the example of Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch, right??

    So you failed to address ‘who controls the controllers.’
    In real life, your competing [social credit score] firms would be completely corrupted within a decade, and to “fix” that you’d end up either resorting to anarchy, or with a centralized system. Again.

  • Last week we traced the necessary historical and geopolitical steps to understand Why Russia is driving the West crazy. And then, last Friday, right before the start of the Year of the Metal Ox, came the bombshell, delivered with customary aplomb by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. In an interview with popular talk show host...
  • @Anonymous
    @Mikael_

    Interesting take on that. So no Nord steam will mean either higher natural gas prices for Germany and so a uncompetitive economy as power is a critical part of a economy and a lock-on for coal power production. ( Since they decided no nuclear) What i hear you say? Germany will go to zero carbon by 2050 but their is no engineering possible to achieved this. More and more wind power I hear you say.
    A very good website
    https://notrickszone.com/
    Wind power is VERY unpopular and it almost recently crashed the German grid aka Texas.

    https://notrickszone.com/2021/02/06/major-winter-storm-threatens-germanys-power-freezing-hell-threatens-if-already-rickety-grid-collapses/

    So cancel Nord stream and Germany becomes un competitive ( They already have the highest tariffs rates in Europe) and somewhere along the line then watch while thousands perish when 'the grid' breaks down due to unreliable green power. I must say it might take something like this to finally show how weak the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming theory/premise is.
    Example, now is the polar vortex (scam)
    https://notrickszone.com/2021/02/09/journal-nature-refutes-piks-fantasy-rich-science-that-a-warmer-arctic-causes-extreme-cold-snaps/

    The final one is that we should not worry about higher temps when plenty of scientific ( peered reviewed) papers tell us NOT TO.

    https://notrickszone.com/2021/01/14/what-global-warming-148-new-2020-scientific-papers-affirm-recent-non-warming-a-degrees-warmer-past/

    Replies: @Mikael_

    Interesting “interpretation” of what I didn’t write.

    Yes, Germany will shut down their last 6 nuclear power plants this and next year.
    Yes, on 2/11/2021 at 10:00 the German grid almost needed rolling blackouts, only by 5 GW import of electricity could that barely be avoided. In this almost real-time chart https://energy-charts.info/charts/power/chart.htm?l=en&c=DE change to week 6, then note the load curve (black line) and then activate “Import Balance” by clicking on it under the diagram.

    No, Germany will not become pure green a.k.a zero carbon, not now and not by 2050.
    The obvious ‘solution’ will be retained or even expanded coal, plus LPG instead of Russian gas.

    Why do you ignore the inherent contradiction in your own statements:
    If Germany already has the highest tariffs, why are they still competitive now, but a further increase would make them completely uncompetitive?

  • With regard to misconceptions of Russian/German history in America, here are a few relevant paragraphs from a 2018 article of mine:

    In my unjustified arrogance, I also sometimes relished a sense of seeing obvious things that magazine or newspaper journalists got so completely wrong, mistakes which often slipped into historical narratives as well. For example, discussions of the titanic 20th century military struggles between Germany and Russia quite often made casual references to the traditional hostility between those two great peoples, who for centuries had stood as bitter rivals, representing the eternal struggle of Slav against Teuton for dominion over Eastern Europe.

    Although the bloodstained history of the two world wars made that notion seem obvious, it was factually mistaken. Prior to 1914, those two great peoples had not fought against each other for the previous 150 years, and even the Seven Years’ War of the mid-18th century had involved a Russian alliance with Germanic Austria against Germanic Prussia, hardly amounting to a conflict along civilizational lines. Russians and Germans had been staunch allies during the endless Napoleonic wars and closely cooperated during the Metterich and Bismarck eras that followed, while even as late as 1904, Germany had supported Russia in its unsuccessful war against Japan. During the 1920s, Weimar Germany and Soviet Russia had a period of close military cooperation, the Hitler-Stalin Pact of 1939 marked the beginning of the Second World War, and throughout the long Cold War, the USSR had no more loyal a satellite than East Germany. Perhaps two dozen years of hostility over the last three centuries, with good relations or even outright alliance during most of the remainder, hardly suggested that Russians and Germans were hereditary enemies.

    Moreover, during much of that period, Russia’s ruling elite had had a considerable Germanic tinge. Russia’s legendary Catherine the Great had been a German princess by birth, and over the centuries so many Russian rulers had taken German wives that the later Czars of the Romanov dynasty were usually more German than Russian. Russia itself had a substantial but heavily assimilated German population, which was very well represented in elite political circles, with German names being quite common among government ministers and sometimes found among important military commanders. Even a top leader of the Decembrist revolt of the early 19th century had had German ancestry but was a zealous Russian-nationalist in his ideology.

    Under the governance of this mixed Russian and German ruling class, the Russian Empire had steadily risen to become one of the world’s foremost powers. Indeed, given its vast size, manpower, and resources, combined with one of the fastest economic growth rates and a natural increase in total population that was not far behind, a 1914 observer might have easily pegged it to soon dominate the European continent and perhaps even much of the world, just as Tocqueville had famously prophesized in the early decades of the 19th century. A crucial underlying cause of the First World War was Britain’s belief that only a preventative war could forestall a rising Germany, but I suspect that an important secondary cause was the parallel German notion that similar measures were necessary against a rising Russia.

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-bolshevik-revolution-and-its-aftermath/

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
    @Ron Unz

    Good Point! the conflict between Germany and Russia was largely engineered by banksters

    , @Zarathustra
    @Ron Unz

    Metterich No
    Metternich Yes
    He was Slavic descend (Czech) Nepomuk roots

    , @Jim Christian
    @Ron Unz


    Indeed, given its vast size, manpower, and resources, combined with one of the fastest economic growth rates and a natural increase in total population that was not far behind, a 1914 observer might have easily pegged it to soon dominate the European continent and perhaps even much of the world
     
    Well, we whittled them down to size, did we not, Ron? Can't remember the numbers for the two World Wars, plus the miseries afterward through the nineties and 2000s, but isn't Russia down to around 150-200 million population, and in decline at that? Tragic, staggeringly. And not necessary, except for the profit of war industries. Smedley Butler, boy did he have them pegged. He called all of it.

    Replies: @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    , @Skeptikal
    @Ron Unz

    "A crucial underlying cause of the First World War was Britain’s belief that only a preventative war could forestall a rising Germany, but I suspect that an important secondary cause was the parallel German notion that similar measures were necessary against a rising Russia."

    Some of this confirmed in Docherty and Macgregor, Hidden History, but some, not. Russian was not "rising" in the sense that Germany had already risen. Russia was politically, economically, socially a backward country, an enormous backward country, that needed a lot of help and foreign investment and know-how to modernize. Germany already was the most modernized country on the continent, largely due to her advanced educational system, relatively advance political system, and *relative* lack of the ancient rigid class system that handicapped Britain. From this p.o.v. the rapid rise of Jews into leading positions in German banking, education, science, communications, the arts, and industry (despite very real obstacles and very real anti-semitism) can be compared positively to Britain's relative lack of social mobility and consequent failure to use all of the country's potential human resources.

    According to HH, "underlying cause" is way too anodyne: a group that Docherty and Macgregor label the Secret Elite, originally instigated by Cecil Rhodes and a few others, inlcluidng Natty Rothschild (who financed Rhodes's diamond mines and other activities in Africa), actively connived to drive Britain toward war with Germany starting in about 1890. Germany, once unified, was cranking on all pistons economically, socially, intellectually, scientifically, and was on track to overcome Britain in all of these metrics. Sound familiar? So, war was the only way to get rid of the new competitor.

    Per Docherty and Macgregor, and amply documented by them where documents have not been destroyed, King Edward VII was part of this conspiracy, which successfully undermined cabinets and "official" government policies by placing conspirators in crucial posts and and making secret treaties---first with japan, then with France, then with Russia. Britain prepared Japan as a proxy by supplying it, over a period of 10 years, with a first-class navy, with which it tanked the Russian navy.

    As for Germany seeing a dangerous rival in Russia, so far in my reading of the book (I am ca. 1/4 of way through) this is not the case. Wilhelm seems to have had far more "cousinly" feelings toward his cousin Nicholas, whereas Edward hated his cousin Wilhelm and started a charm offensive to move Nicholas and Russia into the British camp for the upcoming planned war, despite the hatred of the British public for Russia and its backward autocratic regime. The Russian state was easily manipulated because it had huge debts to the English Rothschilds, for construction of its rail lines and other industrial development. But Germany as the leaders in engineering, chemistry, etc. were natural allies of a developing country.

    Furthermore, Britain and Russia were traditional enemies and competitors in Asia (the Great Game). Of course the whole pre-WW1 picture is vastly complicated by the makeup of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, with significant German and Slav (and Magyar) regions and loyalties.

    Back to Britain and "underlying cause" getting a war started with Germany in order to bring Germany down and destroy a rival was a long-standing British project that was pursued proactively. British imperialists were not dumb. The Secret Elite had to wait for the death of Victoria and the accession of Edward to the throne to really get the ball rolling, but they had been working on this for at least a decade already, mainly infiltrating their men into both parties, the government and its ministries, cranking up the war machine (retooling the army and the navy), creating secret deals with France and Belgium, and "turning" the British public---manufacturing consent via an ongoing vicious negative PR campaign directed against Germany, Germans, and Wilhelm personally.

    Replies: @Seraphim, @Ron Unz

  • @Notsofast
    the germans have too much invested in nord stream 2 (95% complete) to walk away now. once they see they can get away with ingoring the petulant foot stamping of the reigning hegemon they will be emboldened to reach out to both russia and china.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @nokangaroos, @The Alarmist, @Alfred, @Skeptikal

    You are misreading the situation.
    Public support for Nordstream 2 has been steadily eroding in Germeny, a result of the constant propaganda barrage (Navalny?)

    Only because Merkel sees it as a “yuge” political defeat if NS2 would be stopped during her chancellorship, is it still being built.
    After Oktober 2021, her likely successor Laschet will be a much weaker pillar, so a shutdown of the (completed) NS2 is not out of the range of possibility. And don’t bring up the financial issue, in this age of ‘funny money’ no politician would be stopped because of financial reasons anymore.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Mikael_

    Interesting take on that. So no Nord steam will mean either higher natural gas prices for Germany and so a uncompetitive economy as power is a critical part of a economy and a lock-on for coal power production. ( Since they decided no nuclear) What i hear you say? Germany will go to zero carbon by 2050 but their is no engineering possible to achieved this. More and more wind power I hear you say.
    A very good website
    https://notrickszone.com/
    Wind power is VERY unpopular and it almost recently crashed the German grid aka Texas.

    https://notrickszone.com/2021/02/06/major-winter-storm-threatens-germanys-power-freezing-hell-threatens-if-already-rickety-grid-collapses/

    So cancel Nord stream and Germany becomes un competitive ( They already have the highest tariffs rates in Europe) and somewhere along the line then watch while thousands perish when 'the grid' breaks down due to unreliable green power. I must say it might take something like this to finally show how weak the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming theory/premise is.
    Example, now is the polar vortex (scam)
    https://notrickszone.com/2021/02/09/journal-nature-refutes-piks-fantasy-rich-science-that-a-warmer-arctic-causes-extreme-cold-snaps/

    The final one is that we should not worry about higher temps when plenty of scientific ( peered reviewed) papers tell us NOT TO.

    https://notrickszone.com/2021/01/14/what-global-warming-148-new-2020-scientific-papers-affirm-recent-non-warming-a-degrees-warmer-past/

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • Good article,
    but I doubt that Angela Merkel -while not a Russiaphobic- has such long-term targets.
    And her successor Laschet, to which she likely pulled the strings in the background to get him crowned in their CDU party, is just as EU-centric as Merkel.

    • Replies: @Showmethereal
    @Mikael_

    In my estimation Merkel was trying to steer the EU away from being just "atlanticists". It would seem the Obama admin had that feeling too - which is why they were listening in on her calls.

  • From the New York Times: Postcard From Peru: Why the Morality Plays Inside The Times Won’t Stop By Ben Smith, Feb. 14, 2021 In 2012, when The New York Times was panicked about its financial future, this newspaper went into the travel business. It began selling “Times Journeys,” on which an expert beat reporter would...
  • @Corvinus
    @kpkinsunnyphiladelphia

    "Yep, excuse making for the fact that Western Civilization was built on the higher IQ Yamnaya/Conan the Barbarians who, of course, had flocks of docile animal protein along with horses and carts, and the ruthlessness to supplant all the indigenous hunter gatherer and farmer populations in the Euopean continent, dispensing with the males, and taking all the women."

    Not excuse making, but a cogent argument that even Mr. Sailer had difficulty trying hard not to NOTICE.

    "But yeah, Africans could never tame the Zebra, so they didn’t get around to doing geometry, composing epic poetry, and laying the foundations of rationalist philosophy as the source of Western superiority."

    Zebras are not domesticable animals.

    https://thomsonsafaris.com/blog/taming-zebras-domestication-attempts/

    "Ancient Africans" did epic poetry.

    https://africanpoems.net/epic/introduction-to-epics

    "Ancient Africans" did geometry.

    https://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/geometry-from-africa-mathematical-and-educational-explorations

    Pages 352-358...

    https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/272588/1-s2.0-S0315086000X00298/1-s2.0-S0315086084710299/main.pdf?X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEEcaCXVzLWVhc3QtMSJGMEQCIA%2BkLws87RGanqQLCFzv25F%2B%2B%2F3BwedxB4N0Wwe8mRIbAiBpXWCZPQmspK0v2u4b48Jw63QK0rGMgUYLS4SexhnTcyq0AwhQEAMaDDA1OTAwMzU0Njg2NSIM2RiTXUAPCG0Wb%2BjyKpEDQbNviAok7pGGwXE3vs0ikKXcIw6X%2FiVwFY2lm7Yej4cMqMVfgbAZbDzpk%2F177udmZrlyHze2V3853VEv5kkE3EkZrj1ru6LJgqIlRBvGl72fHQ5Id1JSoHkdDpH4uk3Kkc3icDoUqyeT%2FTzF4Meux8%2BQ6Dw0s%2B6FboLEow%2BwV12coNVstOR7iUBnuKgRymHOk8lHaH%2Btot8mWGK%2FKjbN5WB%2Btw4xdYsdzmpt0JoVJltCStxkRcHrz3ecipLV4Z2h%2B3xo%2FSHLpFxu0GTEmh70Lw%2BYdMaKU0xhl09BZ3%2Fpp4o7xQIvfVwaQ6V9UldgrW1WMFeILhHu%2FSuiyzptAYtzh6xSc2cg4njn0ml9j8AG%2B3MI1zfLot7fZnUTh%2B13GsJAxV3UVUB1SsDxli75cs%2FouMTbF3%2F0lGBftP%2FWYXV3unaQhS%2F6LJ7J9R7rZvbRbDF3RC9iFa0H9TIlnN2k%2BONASjeRXPf81OfTICSBXdyQbkCaXJ5dpDHA1McSYbD97bDa9Vk8O48tzZxpncQJYgqjCU8wtJmxgQY67AGaEXJxhJsb2Vfk9RwDU84LXqvepaLfOZOPkAwL05s43qW0263xzYFeoHeeqzSJDRUa4T2bqk5mrSNjbiGKiCUs6%2FnLosu%2BhlLfiOS3n%2B9P27B4q3GfrL6zLW1xgmT1nseAd9EBF8MfhmrIPxmRQudEsW5nge93FoIWA8nl6BLaUG3TpIn3CzhjN6uf0jpzc1TKZ1YPeEEeKIQ7gQfMP541BcSLNiI9fnV6SFfLLU7TZ5sSBuyO0EyjNMDlMWqymd1wc0bPox7MoNl85%2BIPYI4Tc36mZtcWU4LoHLjf60LIQQ99IACsvGo6GpRYzQ%3D%3D&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20210217T001104Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAQ3PHCVTY33S4NGG7%2F20210217%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=850fc3e1398bf889ca638dbb5ececab32229feeceb73c69bb417eb52aae2a1c1&hash=7b709d63d9983244f2b1bc4dc20d03b4abeb547ae69d37ceb2d2ea28a261caaf&host=68042c943591013ac2b2430a89b270f6af2c76d8dfd086a07176afe7c76c2c61&pii=S0315086084710299&tid=spdf-0eab6bb1-ede4-4f52-b051-33243aef9cad&sid=603b89276798b148286a94c531c01c3f16e2gxrqa&type=client

    Do you enjoy being historically inept?

    Replies: @Lockean Proviso, @Mikael_

    Zebras are not domesticable animals.

    Unfortunately your provided link for that topic completely dances around the pink elephant in the room.

    Fact: “You can’t catch a Zebra with a lasso.”

    Some websites try to explain that away as a “reflex”. Wut? The Africans were hunting Zebras for so many millennia with lassos, so they developed a built-in reflex against that??
    Bullschiff.

    Zebras are so intelligent that they understand what the flying lasso loop might mean, and avoid it by ducking. (Now compare to horses.)
    Might their non-domesticability also have something to do with that?

  • @kpkinsunnyphiladelphia
    @Morton's toes

    Yep, excuse making for the fact that Western Civilization was built on the higher IQ Yamnaya/Conan the Barbarians who, of course, had flocks of docile animal protein along with horses and carts, and the ruthlessness to supplant all the indigenous hunter gatherer and farmer populations in the Euopean continent, dispensing with the males, and taking all the women.

    But yeah, Africans could never tame the Zebra, so they didn't get around to doing geometry, composing epic poetry, and laying the foundations of rationalist philosophy as the source of Western superiority.

    Jared IS a joke.

    Replies: @Expletive Deleted, @Corvinus, @Dr. Dre, @Mikael_

    Africans could never tame the Zebra

    Thanks for mentioning that one, KPK.

    It was one of those things, where Jared becomes so clear about things that only complete morons (such as yourself) would miss the utmost importance of IQ – however he wasn’t talking about the Africans, in that specific example.

    • Disagree: Corvinus
  • So the Davos Agenda has come and gone. That was the virtual Great Reset preview, hosted by Kissinger acolyte cum World Economic Forum (WEF) oracle Herr Klaus Schwab. Still, corporate/political so-called “leaders” will continue to wax lyrical about the Fourth Industrial Revolution – or its mild spin-offs such as Build Back Better, the favorite slogan...
  • Ishchenko stresses how, “in terms of scale and impact on historical processes, this is steeper than the Battles of Stalingrad and Kursk combined.”

    As Bock wrote in his diary: “I do not want to ‘capture Moscow’; I want to destroy the enemy’s army and the bulk of that army is right in front of me”. One thing is certain, had Bock’s planned attack of August 17 on Moscow gone ahead, the Soviet army would have been defending the capital with the eroded forces available at that time and place, rather than what was there 76 days later when Bock’s attack actually started–five days before the muddy season bogged it down. All this was in 1941, well before Stalingrad and Kursk.
    Anyway Russia (currently fighting 300 miles from Moscow) is largely important to China as an object lesson in how to not try and take on the West.

    Video Link

    his drive should be based on two pillars: sovereignty – that is, the good old Westphalian model

    The Treaty of Westphalia happened because the Thirty Years war had ended in stalemated exhaustion with no prospect of gains for anyone by continuing or restarting the conflict; both sides agreed to limitation on the sovereignty of their proxy principalities. China is buying up ports, building nuclear power stations, and trying to get their 5G accepted in the West, which is consequently to a nontrivial extent giving up its freedom of action.

    • Troll: Mikael_, Petermx
  • @frontier
    @Mikael_


    Pepe:
    (Putin's speech) is steeper than the Battles of Stalingrad and Kursk combined... (some nobody) exhaustively smashed Eurocentrism... Amidst a tsunami of platitudes...
     
    A tsunami indeed, not only of platitudes but also of meaningless hyperboles. A lot of what Putin does is indeed good and necessary... but not nearly enough. His actions are pretty much forced but they do not reduce the long-term risks for Russia which are quite serious and not so remote. Unfortunately, there's no indication that Putin is aware of it, or if he is, he hasn't found a winning strategy yet, thus the "steeper" speeches entertainment.

    As far as Eurocentrism goes, it was smashed not by the words of nobodies but by the sloppy trade and financial policies of the dysfunctional Western governments. Not coincidentally, those same policies built China, even Trump took part in it despite noises to the contrary. I'm waiting for a sane politician in the larger European sphere to wake up and smell the covfefe and stop pushing further into the swamp they entered some 30 years ago. Although he still comes up short, Putin is the best candidate by far, his Western counterparts are fast asleep with no signs of awakening.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    I was also at first wondering after reading the whole speech –
    but then one has to remember the place where he (virtually) gave it, and that was the most diplomatic in-your-face you can imagine.

    What Pepe reads out of it I can mostly confirm; only very few times he goes one or two steps beyond what was directly stated/implied by Putin, and even then I find Pepe’s conclusions reasonable.

  • Just one and a half years ago, I was heralding the end of the blogosphere and its replacement by the vlogosphere. But last year, along came Substack - a modest newsletter service that doubles as a blogging platform with inbuilt RSS, analytics, and monetization infrastructure. Seemingly exploding out of the blue, before long a rafter...
  • Hadn’t heard of “Bypass Paywalls” add-on, there is also a Firefox version that works for me.

    TYVM!

  • So the Davos Agenda has come and gone. That was the virtual Great Reset preview, hosted by Kissinger acolyte cum World Economic Forum (WEF) oracle Herr Klaus Schwab. Still, corporate/political so-called “leaders” will continue to wax lyrical about the Fourth Industrial Revolution – or its mild spin-offs such as Build Back Better, the favorite slogan...
  • Thanks, Pepe.
    Need to read Putin’s whole speech now!

    • Replies: @frontier
    @Mikael_


    Pepe:
    (Putin's speech) is steeper than the Battles of Stalingrad and Kursk combined... (some nobody) exhaustively smashed Eurocentrism... Amidst a tsunami of platitudes...
     
    A tsunami indeed, not only of platitudes but also of meaningless hyperboles. A lot of what Putin does is indeed good and necessary... but not nearly enough. His actions are pretty much forced but they do not reduce the long-term risks for Russia which are quite serious and not so remote. Unfortunately, there's no indication that Putin is aware of it, or if he is, he hasn't found a winning strategy yet, thus the "steeper" speeches entertainment.

    As far as Eurocentrism goes, it was smashed not by the words of nobodies but by the sloppy trade and financial policies of the dysfunctional Western governments. Not coincidentally, those same policies built China, even Trump took part in it despite noises to the contrary. I'm waiting for a sane politician in the larger European sphere to wake up and smell the covfefe and stop pushing further into the swamp they entered some 30 years ago. Although he still comes up short, Putin is the best candidate by far, his Western counterparts are fast asleep with no signs of awakening.

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • Summary[1a] Marx and many of his less radical contemporary reformers saw the historical role of industrial capitalism as being to clear away the legacy of feudalism – the landlords, bankers and monopolists extracting economic rent without producing real value. But that reform movement failed. Today, the Finance, Insurance and Real Estate (FIRE) sector has regained...
  • @Curmudgeon
    @Mikael_

    Hudson, like most Americans, conflates socialism with communism. Most of Marx's "observations" on capitalism, were "borrowed" from whom Hudson refers to as Marx's "less radical contemporary reformers". Marx's solutions were the problem, not the already well established "observations". Under Marx, the international movement purged the real socialists who saw Marx's solutions as authoritarian. Proudhon, whom Hudson mentions, is known as the father of anarchy, and called Marx "the tapeworm in socialism". It was Proudhon's 1840 book What Is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government that began the concept of "property is theft". Bakunin was less charitable https://libcom.org/library/bakunin-marx-rothschild
    In short, the extreme socialism is an anarchy, believing co-op like structures trading freely with other like structures, were the future inheritors of capitalism. Marxism is an all powerful state. They are polar opposites.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @TheIdiot, @troof

    If I try to parse what you wrote, I can only come up with:
    – extreme socialism is [close to] anarchy
    – but even in [close to] anarchy circumstances, co-op like structures form
    – but then somehow those co-op like structures are not all powerful mini-states.

    The self-contradiction is exactly in the ‘property’: someone owns it – if not individuals, then the co-op which becomes [locally] all powerful, just by that.
    (I.e. you cannot “define away” the concept of property.)

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    @Mikael_

    Your clothes are "property". Land is "real property". Not so long ago, people understood the difference. The original socialists saw the profit of something produced by labour, but owned by capital, as "theft of property". I am a member of a co-op. I own what I own, the co-op doesn't.

  • 2020 saw 14% more deaths than average, last year in England & Wales and that amounted to seventy-five thousand extra deaths. We here use the Office of National statistics figures, as it gives total weekly deaths, plus also for comparison an average value of corresponding weekly deaths over the previous five years.[1] That compares with...
  • @SS-The Independent
    @Magic Dirt

    OK, man/woman...WHAT"S ' speculative ' about ? Name it, please ( or STFU ) ! Regarding your ' advice '..." better to think about how to live now that the world has changed than to speculate...", are you working for " Ministry Of Truth ', or just retarded/mentally impaired ?! How can any NORMAL human being think/express himself like that ?! What Kafka, Huxley, Orwell and that guy who wrote ' Fahrenheit 451 ' wrote/said, is kind of ' sane ', compared to what Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab & Co. of psychopaths are thinking/saying ! BTW, for specimens like you and clones of you, I have a questions: Bill Gates is a college drop-out, born in the ' right family ' ( banksters/eugenicists ), software ' genius/guru'...with NO MEDICAL TRAINING ! WHY me and other people should listen to what this authoritarian sociopath/psychopath and for God sake, WHY the politicians ( ' our representatives ', what a joke ) are listening what he is saying ?! For the other readers: I was born in sixties in Eastern-Europe, under a totalitarian regime and I KNOW what's happening now and were we are going to ! It's a combination of Communism and Fascism ( without eliminating the usury/parasitism, like NAZI did )...a ' perfect NEO-FEUDAL plantation ' at the planetary scale ! IF the sheeple don't wake up fast, and/or listen to trolls like the above ' dirt ', we will live Dante's Inferno and we will envy the dead !

    Replies: @Magic Dirt, @tomo

    Unhinged rant man. Wow. Take a break from the keyboard because this whole “internet” thing seems to really have you spun up.

    No, I don’t think some blogger on the internet posting thoughts about a few charts really proves anything anymore. You can make charts about anything. There is no real statistical analysis in his argument and no indication that he got his information anywhere other than from other blogs… and aside from now banal observations, he just says “the same number of people died now as before”. OK, but I have no way of really knowing one way or the other if that is true. It’s like sitting in a bar and listening to a drunk tell you a Ferrari will go 187 miles per hour. It can be a fun conversation but it’s really meaningless in the grand scheme of things.

    • Agree: Bert, Wizard of Oz
    • Disagree: Ukraine Tiger, Georgia
    • Troll: Mikael_
    • Replies: @SS-The Independent
    @Magic Dirt

    Canta la alta masa ( ori plimba ursul ), cum spune romanul ;-) You either a low IQ ( Forrest Gump's clone ), or a paid troll/shill ( without the ' proper training ' ). Again, please come with facts/arguments, or GFY ! There are many charts, interviews, documentaries, etc., from respected doctors ( Andrew Kaufman, Prof. Dolores Cahill, Mercola, Dan Erickson, etc. ) which proves without doubts that it's a SCAMdemic, or PLANdemic. " 32 Doctors from 11 Countries Warn Against Taking the COVID-19 Vaccine "...just google it ! Pathetic creature...PS: I have a 5 years degree related to biology/chemistry at one of the Universities in one of the Eastern-European Capitals...You know what I am saying ? That I am more trained/ qualified to say something about diseases/vaccines, than Bill Gates...who promotes/sponsor them and make billions on them, while murdering the people around the World...sorry...' reducing the population '...to cite the sociopath/psychopath...And much more than his henchman at WHO...the fake Doctor, war criminal ( in his Country - Ethiopia ), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. ' WHO Chief Tedros Adhanom Accused of Genocide ' - Newsmax.com

    Replies: @Magic Dirt, @Johnny Rico, @tomo

    , @freedom-cat
    @Magic Dirt

    There are many doctors and scientists around the world who's statements on covid19 back up most of what the author in this article is saying.

    former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon: just one of thousands censored by BigTech Billionaires:

    https://thewashingtonstandard.com/former-pfizer-executive-refutes-fauci-lying-media-on-covid-propaganda-its-over-curve-flattened-months-ago-no-second-wave/

    You can hear his interviews on Bitchute, Brighteon, or Brandnewtube:
    https://brandnewtube.com/watch/mike-yeadon_hpEymb59dx13Sda.html

    https://d.tube/#!/v/breesmedia20/QmaDcuzWCbrLJGqMApM5UbXCYfDEmCyJf2c18yVh9P3yND

    https://lockdownsceptics.org/lies-damned-lies-and-health-statistics-the-deadly-danger-of-false-positives/

    Replies: @Alfred

    , @sally
    @Magic Dirt

    You naysayers are just the sorts that believed the world was square, so you did not join the voyage to journey around the world and as a result not only did you not get your lollipop but the global warming reduced the place you were living to 10 feet beneath the surface of the ocean.

    Data is data, and all data is part of the whole picture..

    I think the data even before this Majic Dirt analsysis suggest not only is the impact of the Corona 19 virus nothing more than "state promoted terror propaganda" but the RNA suggested to be a vaccination, is nothing more than a genetic scrip very likely designed to redirect own bodies basic metabolism. After all RNA is used to genetically engineer all biological species, include virus sick mankind.

    The question unansered by anyone, including showman Fauci: "which is more dangerous the RNA vaccination or the virus.."

    I say prove the RNA is not a million times more likely to kill you than the virus. No data has been presented to show me what the RNA script (the so called vaccination) does to you in the long run? Maybe it even makes you controllable by 5g?

    Than you Majic Dirt for the analysis. all these persons who don't won't to listen to you, have not presented one piece of accountable data to disprove or to impringe on your analysis.. Its the best so far.

    It will take more than a presidential order or an act of congress to get me interested in transfecting my body with RNA scripts

    , @Rufus Clyde
    @Magic Dirt

    I agree with you about Kollerstrom's logical fallacy. However, where I live there is more than adequate data to demonstrate that the lockdowns have likely caused significant increased mortality, and course of disease caused by the virus has not.
    Statistics on weekly mortality from Stats Canada shows that in Alberta there has been a steady rise in weekly mortality year-on-year from 2019 rates beginning in March, when the restrictions were announced, in the population that is under age 45, among whom there has been less than a "Covid death" per week. The total, as of the end of October, entailed hundreds of excess deaths in this age group against 26 Covid "deaths".
    The increase in weekly mortality, year-on-year for people in the age cohorts above sixty-five, among whom over 90% of Covid deaths occurred is between 3 and 12% each month since the restrictions were launched. The U-45 death increase rose steadily from about 3% to 65% in October.
    https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310076801
    SARS CoV-2 may very well exist, but there is little evidence that it is producing a categorically higher level of mortality than previous seasonal infectious respiratory diseases, and there is significant evidence that the prophylactic socio-economic restrictions are killing people.

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz

    , @ballbag
    @Magic Dirt

    he states the graph comes from data of the office of national statistics, either learn to read or go back to sleep

  • Summary[1a] Marx and many of his less radical contemporary reformers saw the historical role of industrial capitalism as being to clear away the legacy of feudalism – the landlords, bankers and monopolists extracting economic rent without producing real value. But that reform movement failed. Today, the Finance, Insurance and Real Estate (FIRE) sector has regained...
  • Michael Hudson makes a lot of good observations,
    but then strews in some absolute bullschiff statements such as

    socialism [is] the natural evolution of industrial capitalism

    I really don’t know what to make of the author – is he trying to put a nice wrapper around things he believes we should target to make them more appealing to average readers, just like Marx’s messianic ‘classless society’ supposed goal?

    Why can’t we have some real, honest debate about things without Orwellian redefinitions of terms, such as ‘socialism’?

    • Agree: ruralguy
    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    @Mikael_


    Why can’t we have some real, honest debate about things without Orwellian redefinitions of terms, such as ‘socialism’?
     
    To understand the psychology of a brainwashed Jew -- from Marxist to Capitalist to Zionist -- you need to understand the psychology of the Moneychanger Hebrew.

    The Moneychanger Hebrews (the Jewish establishment) had long betrayed the nationalist Prophets, who manifested in Moses. In fact, they had betrayed them for so long that they changed the nature of the Jewry from a nationalist entity to a grifter nation.

    This grifter nation is still with us today, and with its acolytes, now bigger than ever. And they putrefy everything the touch because their character is putrid. The entire psychology of Jewry today is "Defend the Grift at any cost!"

    What is the Grift? World fiat currency, and total control of it. And only when Zionists have totalitarian control will the world be delivered into Paradise, heaven and earth united.

    Of course, it's all a big lie -- the Biggest Lie -- because it's a concoction of Moneychanger liars who have piled lie upon lie for centuries, so much so that their very essence has become the Big Lie.

    "You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

    Christian nonsense? Or a statement of truth from a Jew about putrefied character of the "Jewish" establishment?
    , @Curmudgeon
    @Mikael_

    Hudson, like most Americans, conflates socialism with communism. Most of Marx's "observations" on capitalism, were "borrowed" from whom Hudson refers to as Marx's "less radical contemporary reformers". Marx's solutions were the problem, not the already well established "observations". Under Marx, the international movement purged the real socialists who saw Marx's solutions as authoritarian. Proudhon, whom Hudson mentions, is known as the father of anarchy, and called Marx "the tapeworm in socialism". It was Proudhon's 1840 book What Is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government that began the concept of "property is theft". Bakunin was less charitable https://libcom.org/library/bakunin-marx-rothschild
    In short, the extreme socialism is an anarchy, believing co-op like structures trading freely with other like structures, were the future inheritors of capitalism. Marxism is an all powerful state. They are polar opposites.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @TheIdiot, @troof

  • If you’re new to high finance, then the concept of “shorting” is bizarre and convoluted. People actually make money from stocks falling? How is this possible? Why is it legal? Does this contribute anything to society? Am I missing out? Here’s how shorting works. Let’s say you have a neighbor who is a cat lady...
  • @Mefobills
    @Schuetze

    Tesla is a fraud, but a fraud with a Fed put.
    __________________

    There is also a China put, and a California put, etc. There is a cross-over where batteries get cheap enough, and then ICE cars are road-kill.

    I guess BEV economics don't work out, which is why GM, Volkswagen and others are comitting to electric? The "put" is only one factor in an mult-variable economic equation.

    https://www.gm.com/electric-vehicles.html

    GM is on its way to an all-electric future, with a commitment to 30 new global electric vehicles by 2025


    In Tesla's case, they are not hypothecating cars, they are actually making them and building real physical infrastructure. The shorts were the market betting against Tesla's strategy. The assumption is that Tesla profit taking was contingent on a government "put," but that ignores the Battery cross-over point, where ICE cars are roadkill.

    In other words, an entire industry is being disrupted, so the profits will come later. This sort of shorting against Tesla is not naked shorting, but a simple gamble against a strategy.

    Replies: @Schuetze, @The Alarmist, @Twodees Partain, @Corrupt

    “I guess BEV economics don’t work out, which is why GM, Volkswagen and others are comitting to electric? The “put” is only one factor in an mult-variable economic equation.”

    Of all UR commenters, I would have expected you, Mefobills, to understand that this entire BEV bubble is due to central banks. Largarde has already made fixing global warming part of the ECB mandate. Mark Carney is out shilling for it like a cheap whore. I believe Powell has also been blathering on about it. Meanwhile Musk commutes all over the planet in his gulfstream, daily.

    Musk’s “earnings” were not GAP, but the result of all kinds of dishonest and illegal balance sheet and income statement manipulation. Without all the massive subsidies Tesla never would have gotten started, it if had, it never would have been able to open a plant. He has waged a ruthless and what should have been illegal war against his critics on twitter, and even went so far as calling the Australian diver who rescued the Thai spelunkers “pedo guy”. I believe this is the only time Musk has lost a case in court, which is more evidence that the Kazarian tribe of usurers has his back.

    As far as GM, VW or anybody else being forced into the BEV market being evidence that this is the “future”, time will tell. I believe this is just another facet of the deliberate Cloward and Piven strategy to destroy European civilization.

    As a final note, Bill “save the planet from carbon” Gates has been in a bidding war for a giant jet leasing company. All these pedo-crypto jews have yaughts and private jets and multiple houses across the planet. They clearly aren’t worried about carbon pollution. Barry Sotero has seaside houses in Martha’s Vinyard and on Oahu. If you cannot figure out that they don’t believe in global warming from all their hypocrisy, then you really deserve to have Elon Musk as your idol.

    • Thanks: Twodees Partain
    • Replies: @Mefobills
    @Schuetze

    I thought about it and you have a good point. I stand corrected.

    , @Larchmonter420
    @Schuetze


    As far as GM, VW or anybody else being forced into the BEV market being evidence that this is the “future”, time will tell. I believe this is just another facet of the deliberate Cloward and Piven strategy to destroy European civilization.
     
    Salam brother,

    Not to destroy European (Christians) civilization and Muslim civilization but to preserve them from parasites. But first, lately CEO of Toyota made a statement that they the Toyota don't see much future in electric vehicles and he listed several reasons for it. He also mentioned that Toyota has dabbed in it to keep their loyal customers satisfied.

    1. No benefit to environment as the batteries are charged by fossil fuels.
    2. The cost of batteries is very high which hoovers around $20,000 per vehicle, making the vehicles very expansive for mass market.
    3. Battery have shelf lives, and have to be replaced every so often.
    4. Long downtime when during charging the batteries. It is not Gas'n'Go.

    Last years Elon Musk has sold slightly less than half a millions vehicles, in comparison to 82.5 million total vehicles sold. A drop in a bucket.

    Very early the parasites figured out creating mammon from thin air. Prince of Peace Jesus (as) warmed us about it. Every time, the mankind destroy parasite locally, but left the enriched mammon environment untouched in other places. So, the parasites moved to a new environment, the new host being full of mammon. The problem was shipped to next door. To really destroy the parasites the wealth of the world has to be destroyed and nothing less.

    Already Federal Reserve has become defunct and M1 has been destroyed with debit/credit and no money actually changing hands. Debit/credit; debit/credit; debit/credit. Covid-19 and Covid-21 is destroying all kind of investments. The only investment left is for investment sake in Stock, which also include crypto currencies, such as Bitcoin where no one has seen them or understand them now hoovering around $35,000 a coin.

    Covid-19 has taught us that we don't need much possession to survive and our daily needs are minutes. The rest is the greed for accumulation of mammon and the power which comes with mammon. The whole world is in cahoots to destroy this mammon, thus destroying the environment in which the parasites thrives. This is the only way to get rid of the parasites for a long, long time.

    A short clip is making rounds in the Middle East where two dogs (USA and Iran) are separated with metal guard. When the door is fully closed both the dogs are barking and trying to tear each other out through the guard. The door is then partially opened, and the dogs become calm and stay on their own side. The door is closed again, the barking and trying to tear each other out starts again. The door is partially opened again, and the calmness prevails. I believe you catch my drift.

    Very early the Bush Jr. removed Iran's two enemies from power, Saddam and Taliban. And, Iran is in Syria now.

    Best regards,

    Mohamed
    , @acementhead
    @Schuetze


    "Without all the massive subsidies Tesla never would have gotten started, it if had, it never would have been able to open a plant."
     
    Absolutely correct. Tesla owes its existence solely to moronic, lunatic-leftist politicians. Oh and also dullard 'scientists' such as Tim Flannery pushing the "climate emergency" fraud. Flannery is so stupid that he couldn't get in to a science degree course so did a degree in English Lit.

    Replies: @Bert

  • “Tesla became one of the most shorted stocks of all time, forcing the price lower and causing Elon major headaches on top of his struggles with Twitter and the SEC. But the Tesla diehards believed in the company and trusted that demand for the vehicles would materialize eventually. When Tesla unexpectedly posted a quarterly profit, everything changed. The stock rocketed higher.”

    Tesla is a fraud, but a fraud with a Fed put. As if wompy wheels, self-igniting batteries, suicidal FSD and the never ending drama of quality control deficiencies weren’t enough, it is Musk’s hucksterism, thuggery and blackmail of its employees that really tells the whole story. Musk should have been put in jail by the SEC years ago.

    About the only admirable thing Musk has done in his entire life is shaft California and move to Texas.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    @Schuetze

    Tesla is a fraud, but a fraud with a Fed put.
    __________________

    There is also a China put, and a California put, etc. There is a cross-over where batteries get cheap enough, and then ICE cars are road-kill.

    I guess BEV economics don't work out, which is why GM, Volkswagen and others are comitting to electric? The "put" is only one factor in an mult-variable economic equation.

    https://www.gm.com/electric-vehicles.html

    GM is on its way to an all-electric future, with a commitment to 30 new global electric vehicles by 2025


    In Tesla's case, they are not hypothecating cars, they are actually making them and building real physical infrastructure. The shorts were the market betting against Tesla's strategy. The assumption is that Tesla profit taking was contingent on a government "put," but that ignores the Battery cross-over point, where ICE cars are roadkill.

    In other words, an entire industry is being disrupted, so the profits will come later. This sort of shorting against Tesla is not naked shorting, but a simple gamble against a strategy.

    Replies: @Schuetze, @The Alarmist, @Twodees Partain, @Corrupt

    , @Johnny Walker Read
    @Schuetze

    It's only gonna get worse my friend. The electric car scam to soon be forced down all our throats.

    Accelerated Obsolescence
    https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2021/01/29/accelerated-obsolescence/

    Replies: @Schuetze

    , @Mustapha Mond
    @Schuetze

    Agree completely.

    Add to that the utter narcissistic psychopathy evidenced by Muskrat towards the destruction of democracy in Bolivia when in 2019 Evo Morales was ousted in a US/OAS backed coup in Bolivia when Morales won in the first round of voting. Many people died in Bolivia protesting the open and obvious coup, and all Elongated Muskrat had to smugly declare was: "We will coup whoever we want. Deal with it", thereby possibly confirming the rumors about it being US backed and in no small part to obtain the mining rights for lithium that Tesla and others were hoping to enjoy at sweetheart pricing: https://www.indepthnews.net/index.php/opinion/3735-we-will-coup-whoever-we-want-elon-musk-and-the-overthrow-of-democracy-in-bolivia

    I'm sure his satellite program "Starlink" will be completely benign and only there to simply bring oodles of peace and information freedom and rainbows to a world shortly to be saturated with 5G radiation........ https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/20/fcc-approves-spacex-to-deploy-1-million-antennas-for-starlink-internet.html

    Replies: @Schuetze

    , @Onan the Barbarian
    @Schuetze

    "@elonmusk is the greatest entrepreneur of our generation. He’s trying to save Planet Earth with sustainable energy..."

    Muskrat hasn't said a single word about where the electricity for his bumper cars is supposed to come from, nor how it is to be transported (we would require at least 10× the current capacity in terms of both generation and transmission), nor how the rare earths in the batteries are sourced, nor how they can eventually be recycled (battery composition is kept secret); and at closer scrutiny, his "business" is mostly selling CO2 certificates to people who are actually producing cars and are now being screwed over by Greta Tunastink and her ilk.

    It would be fairer to say he is the greatest charlatan of a very lost generation, trying to save his obviously damaged self-esteem with very unsustainable scamming, adored by people whose knowledge of science and technology does not cover the difference between radio waves and radioactivity, and whose knowledge of economics focuses on Scrooge McDuck.

  • A good and at times hilarious article,
    but marred by the presentation of Elon Musk as “a good guy.”

  • Many Americans woke up this week to the crystal-clear realization that we have entered a fifth generation (5G) civil war for control of this county – a culture war, yes, but much more than that. In this short essay, I draw from history to briefly reflect on what this means to me as a more...
  • @geokat62
    @Mikael_


    But the central question you need to work on is: What are you [peacefully] fighting for?
     
    Our children’s, grandchildren’s, and great grandchildren’s futures.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    Gee thanks, now everyone can pick whatever they want. I mean what is there even to discuss here.

  • @Schuetze
    @Mikael_

    You asked me:


    "I’d like to hear from you [just as I asked from the article writer], what are your ultimate positive goals, i.e. highest values?

    It is extremely difficult in this vast tangle of malice, to find a positive way out. Did you find one?"
     
    Apparently, your solution, your way out, is through religion. I won't try to debate which religion or where and how that religion will be the positive way out. Judea has genocided untold millions of Chrisitians far more devout than you, and far more devout than I could ever be. I am sorry, but I do not see a way out of this for me or my entire blood line through any religion. If the lord helps he who helps himself, then I will help the lord by helping my kin.

    "Any attempts to inoculate them against certain ways of thinking without using painfully detailed reasoning, will likely backfire in a big way during their lives."
     
    Judging by Americas newest Gen-Y and the Millenials, a thorough "woke" brainwashing requires absolutely zero detailed reasoning. Using my best logic, all my influence and their respect, I believe that I can accomplish the anti-cultural marxist indoctrination inoculation of my grandchildren without much effort. Time will tell.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @Ugetit

    Apparently, your solution, your way out, is through religion.

    I wouldn’t say that exactly.
    I’d say my way out is ‘life is not about to be proven right, but to make the world a little bit a better place every day’, which turns out requires the abolition of perfectism belief and the acceptance of a highest value higher than oneself.
    I feel I have ended up in the same place as Christianity, but I didn’t get there through religion (although that’s certainly also possible.)

    And I obviously described the positive way out in one’s mindset.
    What you conclude from that in practical life is an entirely different discussion – I for example, after for years considering my other options, moved out of the US last year.

  • @Schuetze
    @Mikael_


    “how do you give/show your grand children a positive way out.”
     
    Clearly, if there is a second holodomor there will be little I can accomplish to save my grand children, or children for that matter.

    As for my grand children my current approach is to "innoculate" them from cultural marxism to any degree that I can. I am well aware that this eventually is likely to bring them, me, or their parents problems. Here is what I am talking about:

    With the boys I talk about guns. I have BB and Airguns, and we have modified Nerfs. We target shoot. Their mother hates this but tolerates it. I recently watched a WWII war movie with them (instead of some drivel like Star Wars) and talked about all kinds of things in the movie with them. I explained to them that it was England that started WWI and WWII and that the bombers were murdering Germans and the pilots were in actuality war criminals.

    With the girls I try to keep them doing feminine things. Playing with babies, baths, kitchens, doctors, animals, etc. I also try to be more masculine and to play the alpha male around their grandmother.


    I personally have found an answer, for me.
     
    Please tell me, I am very interested.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    I believe it is best to let one’s kids make their own choices. Any attempts to innoculate them against certain ways of thinking without using painfully detailed reasoning, will likely backfire in a big way during their lives.

    My answer:
    The Existentialists got it right: “Life is suffering.” (1)
    And everybody needs to transcend his/her suffering, to have the best chance for a meaningful and fulfilled life.

    I’ll try to put it in a progression.
    Note: this is an entirely rationalist-first approach. If you absolutely want to, you can easily map it onto religion early on, but try to hold your horses for a moment.

    1.) Build your value hierarchy:
    – When you choose between two choices, you make a (personal) statement about what you value higher than other things.
    – Do this often enough using the truest truth you can conceive of and you end up with your own, more or less complete, sustainable & stable personal value hierarchy.
    – For all matters and purposes, that value hierarchy is your religion.
    And your highest value is your god.
    If you’ve thought long and deep enough, you’ll come to very similar conclusions as other people, about those two concepts.

    [MORE]

    2.) Decide if your highest value is higher than yourself:
    Is your highest value so extremely important to you, that you put it higher than your own wants, always?
    If No, you’re an Individualist, the standard nowadays. You will never be able to sustainably work towards a goal requiring a large number of people striving together towards it, because you have no commonly agreed-upon highest value with them. You may achieve local space content of mind, but if fate ever knocks you flat, you will be lost as you have no higher value to look up to while you’re in the gutter.
    If Yes, great. Try to formulate a meta-physics (more below) if you want to sharpen your highest values. Look for other people who share your value hierarchy – while difficult these days in the US due to low number of such deep non-individualist thinkers, the surprising thing will be that everyone you find who thought as deep will have come to very similar conclusions as you.

    3. ) Consider a meta-physics:
    Note: meta-physics are the rules that make the world work, which goes way beyond physical things.
    To me, transcendence always goes along with suffering [your mortality, limits, faults, mistakes], as I haven’t heard anybody ever “transcending their happiness”, so it’s situation-dependent.
    Meta-physics on the other hand always applies, and is the attempt to identify an as-singular[=unified]-and-simple-as-possible foundation of the ultimate reasons for one’s actions.

    I listened to Jordan B. Peterson saying “if you create order out of chaos using truthful speech, then the resulting order is good.” A mind-boggling idea. Unprovable scientifically; but for all I know it seems to be entirely correct. (That’s actually the “Logos.”)

    Or more generally speaking:
    First you expand your thinking to the extremes. Then you end up with [Jungian] archetypes. An archetype is something you cannot make bigger/stronger/more extreme by exaggeration anymore. Hell is an archetype. As is heaven, or a dragon.
    Peterson again: “Jesus is the archetype of the individual: the worst possible thing happens to the man acting in the best possible way.” Wow. I find that irrefutable. Now think long and hard what God is an archetype of, for you. (I haven’t seen any pre-canned answers to that, including from Peterson. It took me 2 months to come up with a good answer, which I still find valid as of today.)
    Now you have covered everything including to the most extremes in your expanse of thought, and it’s time to go the other direction: simplify and unify the underlying rules/”laws” that explain how all works, up to the archetypes. The result is metaphysics.

    “Every human has a spark of divinity in him.” (Peterson again, but that feels now a bit of a cop-out to me, more below.) That’s potential he’s referring to, especially younger ones like children.
    “Every human is Divine, meaning he cannot be used.” (Not Peterson anymore, so far I haven’t heard him get that deep.) What the writer was trying to convey is ‘a [self-conscious] human cannot be used as a means to an end’, for example by other humans [and with good outcomes.]
    That is super meta.

    I once watched an Orthodox Christian Archpriest state “…to accept the idea that God can be anything but power. Christianity presents a paradoxical view of God as weakness. God is frailty.”
    An absolutely mind-blowing viewpoint to me, at the time. Compare to other religions.
    That is crazy meta.

    4.) Afterthoughts:
    You will up very close to Christianity. As you can likely see, I transformed from life-long atheist to Christian over the last 2 years, confirming Dostoevsky “who regarded atheism pushed to the highest degree as the condition for the discovery of God.” (Please always remember to not conflate Christianity [the ideas] with institutionalized Christianity [churches.])
    If you so desire, you can use the whole set of ideas without ever using the words God or religion – it’s still true.
    For me, Augusto Del Noce then closed the circle, by stating “[Existentialism is] at best (think of Kierkegaard) an expression of the agony of Christianity”, in his book “The Crisis of Modernity.”

    5.) Just when you thought you’re done:
    But there is one step beyond describing/defining God that is unique in Christianity (to the best of my understanding), and that’s the duality/split of the earthly and the heavenly/divine and how that is exactly understood. As I see it, the Original Sin is a strong abstraction of that split, it’s origin/cause, and it’s consequences.
    Think long and hard about perfectism.
    ‘Perfectism’ is Augusto Del Noce’s term (English translated from original Italian) for “a belief that large-scale perfection is attainable [on earth], or the attempt to implement such” – which he declares automatically leads to totalitarianism. (He uses the new word to distinguish it from perfectionism which describes the same for small-scale entities, such as a very small group of people or a single individual, where such might still be achievable.)
    I can’t be more explicit here, you need to get it yourself.

    (1) Jordan B. Peterson demonstrates in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_7hCPYgXEk
    Video Link
    that the Existentialists didn’t ask ‘why are people afraid of death’ but went beyond, turned the question on its head and asked ‘how come there are some people that aren’t? [afraid of death]
    18:10 “The Existentialists continuously claim -unlike the psychoanalysts- that people are psycho-pathological […] because the conditions of existence are so tragic that it’s inevitable that people become psycho-pathological. OK, so what’s the argument. Well, people are self-conscious, well that’s a big problem, we know we are going to die, we are aware of our temporal limitations, so that’s a real catastrophe […], and everyone knows they’re prone to illness of all sorts, and ageing, and so is everyone else they know […] and you fall short along pretty much any axis of comparison you wish to generate. So the Existential point of view on that is, that all of that’s enough to make the default condition of human beings psycho-pathological.” […]
    “Maybe if you stop bullying yourself, the tragic conditions of existence would become bearable, because you would be strong enough to tolerate them” […] “that [Jung’s idea of progression towards the self] is the only optimistic hypothesis I’ve ever seen in psychology.”

    • Replies: @Schuetze
    @Mikael_

    You asked me:


    "I’d like to hear from you [just as I asked from the article writer], what are your ultimate positive goals, i.e. highest values?

    It is extremely difficult in this vast tangle of malice, to find a positive way out. Did you find one?"
     
    Apparently, your solution, your way out, is through religion. I won't try to debate which religion or where and how that religion will be the positive way out. Judea has genocided untold millions of Chrisitians far more devout than you, and far more devout than I could ever be. I am sorry, but I do not see a way out of this for me or my entire blood line through any religion. If the lord helps he who helps himself, then I will help the lord by helping my kin.

    "Any attempts to inoculate them against certain ways of thinking without using painfully detailed reasoning, will likely backfire in a big way during their lives."
     
    Judging by Americas newest Gen-Y and the Millenials, a thorough "woke" brainwashing requires absolutely zero detailed reasoning. Using my best logic, all my influence and their respect, I believe that I can accomplish the anti-cultural marxist indoctrination inoculation of my grandchildren without much effort. Time will tell.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @Ugetit

  • @Schuetze
    @Mikael_


    "to find a positive way out. Did you find one?"
     
    I don't have a "way out", but I do have a positive purpose. They are called grand children, born and yet to be born. I cannot imagine leading a rudderless life with out their future being my guiding star. One of my worries is when push comes to shove, how much will I be personally willing to sacrifice for their well being. Poverty? Pain? Starvation?

    I slapped that list together as I was finishing my coffee and getting ready to go, some of them were certainly not entirely on target.

    I find that you added Skripal & Navalny to be interesting. I have followed the story and there is litle doubt in my mind that they were psyops aimed mostly at Russia, almost certainly from MI5 or 6 and originating from Portendown. In what way would you say that this relates to southern males though?

    Replies: @Mikael_, @Peripatetic Itch

    Well that only extends the question to “how do you give/show your grand children a positive way out.”

    I’m not trying to rub salt in a wound, just want you to focus on the key question.
    (I personally have found an answer, for me.)

    You wrote as introduction to your list

    I will present off of the top of my head a few important milestones along my path [to reality and truth]

    To me, my added examples relate to the
    more and more in-your-face distribution of ever more outrageous (and transparent!) lies.

    • Replies: @Schuetze
    @Mikael_


    “how do you give/show your grand children a positive way out.”
     
    Clearly, if there is a second holodomor there will be little I can accomplish to save my grand children, or children for that matter.

    As for my grand children my current approach is to "innoculate" them from cultural marxism to any degree that I can. I am well aware that this eventually is likely to bring them, me, or their parents problems. Here is what I am talking about:

    With the boys I talk about guns. I have BB and Airguns, and we have modified Nerfs. We target shoot. Their mother hates this but tolerates it. I recently watched a WWII war movie with them (instead of some drivel like Star Wars) and talked about all kinds of things in the movie with them. I explained to them that it was England that started WWI and WWII and that the bombers were murdering Germans and the pilots were in actuality war criminals.

    With the girls I try to keep them doing feminine things. Playing with babies, baths, kitchens, doctors, animals, etc. I also try to be more masculine and to play the alpha male around their grandmother.


    I personally have found an answer, for me.
     
    Please tell me, I am very interested.

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • @Schuetze
    My expedition down the rabbit hole started about 2005 when I realized that 9/11 was an inside job and that 2 jets could not have blown 3 sky scrapers apart. When Barry "chooms" Sotero and his tranny "wife" got elected in 2008, my wife and I recognized that the Kazar-communist take over was complete and started implementing our plan, which centered around "prepping".

    Since that time, I have managed to alienate the vast majority of my extended family and friends trying to wake them up. My success rate at getting people to open their eyes probably approaches that of the "covid 19" death rate. It goes without saying that all these contacts that I have lost are mask loving idiots.

    As the years have passed and as my wife and I, and to a large degree our children, have progressed down the "conspiracy theory" rabbit hole, one thing that I have noticed reading Unz and other similar blogs, is how often people who wake up suddenly believe that they have achieved understanding, while at the same time frowning upon people further down the rabbit hole as "conspiracy theorists". Ron Unz is actually a very good example of this, he call people who discuss things like faked moon landings or MKUltra "nutters".

    Over the years I have burrowed ever deeper down the rabbit hole and I have been forced to completely change my entire world view as new "facts" were discovered. In order to illustrate my interpretation of this rabbit hole to reality and truth, I will present off of the top of my head a few important milestones along my path, listed in order of depth down the hole. You could also consider this to be metaphorically peeling the layers of the onion.

    - There was no WMD in Iraq and they all knew it
    - The Kennedy assassination was an inside job
    - The Kazarians tried to sink the Liberty
    - 9/11 was an inside job
    - Global Warming is a scam
    - Balfour
    - Schiff and the Kazarian Banker Cabal finance and caused the Russian Revolution
    - WWII was a continuation of WWI
    - Kazarian Bankers started both wars
    - Eisenhower had Patton assassinated
    - Lusitania was loaded with explosive and England lied
    - Wilson dragged the US into the war on the behalf of his Kazarian owners
    - Operation Gladio and the terrorist acts in Europe after WWII
    - Bela Kuhn and the November revolution
    - Jews owned and ran the slave trade in the US
    - The "Civil War" as an act of genocide
    - The holohoax
    - The "founding fathers" were all freemasons
    - The Macy conferences and MKUltra
    - The Grateful Dead, Doors and Airplane were CIA fronts for passing out LSD
    - Transhumanism
    - The interesection of 5G/nano-particle vaccinations/Covid 19

    I think that is enough to get the idea across. The real point here is that we are far beyond the point of getting people to open their eyes, they never will until they actually experience physical pain. It is just as Uri Besmenov told us in the '80's, the US and the planets white people have become demoralized. So now this demoralized world population has to face a massive conspiracy centered around "ze great reset" that has been orchestrated and computer gamed for decades. The plan is clearly a form of neo-feudalism centered around transhumanism and massive population reduction. Google Catherine Austin Fitts.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @St-Germain, @flashlight joe, @Irish Savant, @the Dude's brother, @Luus Kanin, @Joe O

    While I disagree with a few points on your list (and not because I’m less deep down the rabbit hole, but because I have looked very deep into them and concluded there are variants that require much less conspiracy to get to the same outcome), and would add
    – MH-17
    – the Cypriot “banking crisis”
    – the “surprise” attack on Pearl Harbor
    – Skripal & Navalny

    I’d like to hear from you [just as I asked from the article writer], what are your ultimate positive goals, i.e. highest values?

    It is extremely difficult in this vast tangle of malice, to find a positive way out. Did you find one?

    • Replies: @Schuetze
    @Mikael_


    "to find a positive way out. Did you find one?"
     
    I don't have a "way out", but I do have a positive purpose. They are called grand children, born and yet to be born. I cannot imagine leading a rudderless life with out their future being my guiding star. One of my worries is when push comes to shove, how much will I be personally willing to sacrifice for their well being. Poverty? Pain? Starvation?

    I slapped that list together as I was finishing my coffee and getting ready to go, some of them were certainly not entirely on target.

    I find that you added Skripal & Navalny to be interesting. I have followed the story and there is litle doubt in my mind that they were psyops aimed mostly at Russia, almost certainly from MI5 or 6 and originating from Portendown. In what way would you say that this relates to southern males though?

    Replies: @Mikael_, @Peripatetic Itch

  • Your waking-up and now clear-sightedness on the propaganda front is to be commended.

    But the central question you need to work on is: What are you [peacefully] fighting for?
    And the answer to that should be quite specific and detailed, not discretionary for the sake of maximum inclusivity.

    After you found your answer comes the most difficult part, you need to find like-minded people. Or educate people about your answer, in an open-ended way, and how you got there.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    @Mikael_


    But the central question you need to work on is: What are you [peacefully] fighting for?
     
    Our children’s, grandchildren’s, and great grandchildren’s futures.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    , @Ugetit
    @Mikael_


    But the central question you need to work on is: What are you [peacefully] fighting for?
     
    Not to be too pedantic, but fighting, peaceful or not, appears to be only one phase in the eternal struggle, so a better question may be "what are you struggling for?" Or is it the right time in the struggle to fight?

    It appears to me that the struggle also involves this approach too, as you seem to suggest,


    Allah’s Messenger said, “There will be afflictions during which a sitting person will be better than a standing one, and the standing one will be better than a walking one, and the walking one will be better than a running one, and whoever will expose himself to these afflictions, they will destroy him. So whoever can find a place of protection or refuge from them, should take shelter in it.”

    -Sahih al-Bukhari 7082, Vol. 9, Book 88, Hadith 203
    https://sunnah.com/bukhari/92/33#!


    23 A patient person puts up with things until the right time comes: but his joy will break out in the end.
    24 Till the time comes he keeps his thoughts to himself…

    -Sirach, Ecclesiasticus, 1:23-24.

    https://www.catholic.org/bible/book.php?id=28&bible_chapter=1
     

    H/t to "Huda," UNZ commentator for the first quote and I hope I'm using his/her gift in the spirit intended.
  • The night of the January 6 invasion of the Capitol building, I immediately thought of the 1933 Reichstag Fire, when Nazi Brownshirts helped a foolish Communist set fire to the German parliament house and used that as an excuse to arrest the leaders of the German Communist Party and pass an act giving Chancellor Hitler...
  • Sorry, but to write a whole article about associations with the Reichstag Fire
    but never mentioning 9/11 in that context, displays a special kind of delusion (or one-sidedness) by the author.

    • Replies: @Miro23
    @Mikael_


    Sorry, but to write a whole article about associations with the Reichstag Fire but never mentioning 9/11 in that context, displays a special kind of delusion (or one-sidedness) by the author.
     
    I was thinking the same thing. If Rasmusen is going to quote Hitler's Reichstag Fire Decree:

    It is therefore permissible to restrict the rights of personal freedom, freedom of expression, including the freedom of the press, the freedom to organize and assemble, the privacy of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications. Warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.
     
    - Then the obvious parallel is 9/11 with the ushering in of the Patriot Act + mass NSA spying and Homeland Security. And then there's the fact that the Reichstag and 9/11 both involved fires - although accepted that the Reichstag didn't collapse. Maybe the Bolsheviks or Brownshirts or whoever forgot to bring the explosives.
  • Science and politics make awkward bedfellows. Science is more concerned with the truth, or ought to be; politics more concerned with expediency, survival and the avoidance of blame. For that reason, politics is closer to human nature. It is natural to simply hope for the best, to take precautions a little too late, and relax...
  • “They screwed up by not stopping Wuhan flights immediately”. And Italian flights. And they should have stopped Britons returning from continental ski resorts, and, and, and.

    You must have a higher opinion of politicians and civil servants than I do if you think they were likely to get such things right. Still, let’s have a law that all skiing hols must go here:
    https://www.visitscotland.com/see-do/active/skiing-snowsports/centres-resorts/

    Old Trumpy got Wuhan flights right and was bombarded with accusations of being xenophobic, racist, Nazi.

    Our civil servants proved their incompetence by appointing the astrologer from Imperial College to the key advisory committee – the members seem to have become more a Committee of Public Safety than mere advisors.

    By the way, I think the quarterly figures plotted in figure 5 here give a revealing history of our death rates which, it turns out, are equal to those of year 2000.
    https://dr-no.co.uk/2021/01/14/through-a-glass-lightly/#comments

    • Thanks: Mikael_
  • @Ron Unz

    Has too much fuss been made of Covid-19? Many skeptics felt it was just a bad case of the flu, plus general hysteria. Of course, asking whether a seasonal epidemic is bad invites the reply: “Compared to what?”.
     
    There was a good article in this morning's WSJ showing the total "excess deaths" during the epidemic across most of the countries in the world that have reliable statistics:

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-covid-19-death-toll-is-even-worse-than-it-looks-11610636840

    On average, these "excess deaths" have been running about 40% higher than the reported number of Covid-19 fatalities, suggesting that the true impact of the epidemic has been greatly under-stated.

    The numbers are even worse in the US. For example:

    In the U.S. alone, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data show more than 475,000 excess deaths through early December, a time frame that also included about 281,000 deaths linked to Covid-19, according to Johns Hopkins University.
     
    This indicates that American Covid-19 deaths may have been 70%(!) greater than the widely-reported totals. Since deaths have greatly accelerated since early December and our vaccination efforts have not gone well, we might even get close to a total body-count of a million before the epidemic abates.

    But as I keep on emphasizing, it's entirely a matter of personal opinion whether a million American deaths is a big number or a small number...

    Replies: @gay troll, @Ultrafart the Brave, @Andrei, @Mikael_

    This indicates that American Covid-19 deaths may have been 70%(!) greater than the widely-reported totals.

    Shouldn’t we be more precise,
    and clearly state those excess deaths are “deaths somehow related to Covid-19″ (i.e. also including deaths from lockdown-despair, reduced access to regular healthcare, etc.),
    as opposed to
    the [implicit] assumption those are all “deaths directly caused by Covid-19″?

  • AS A COINAGE GOES, DEEP TECH is superior to the Big-Tech term. It better captures the deforming power and tentacular reach into state and civil society of the high-tech monopolists. That reach notwithstanding, many libertarian-minded and “small-government conservatives” (a contradiction in terms, considering the national debt is $28 trillion) have been stalwart defenders of the...
  • So Ilana,
    when will you close your twitter account, etc.?

    Full disclosure:
    I never had a twitter account, closed my fb 2 years ago, never used a large company as email provider, will close my (rarely ever used) goolag account the next days, and am considering switching from my iPhone back to my previously used Blackberry Z10 (kept exactly for such a scenario.)

  • @Howardofski
    @Realist

    Eliminating the Deep State would also be playing Whac-A-Mole. What is not seen is the Deep Problem.

    The Deep Problem is that nearly all humans think that government is a good idea being done poorly, when it is actually an evil idea being done thoroughly. Monopoly is ALWAYS the work of government, never the free market, yet most humans believe just the opposite, that government is required to curb monopoly in free markets.

    IP law, a metaphorically-based irrationality to justify monopoly, is at the root of much of the power of Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, etc. IP law is a nearly religious icon for Conservatives, Libertarians, even Ayn Rand's Objectivists, yet it is the main tool of growth for these monstrous tyrannical corporations.

    We are a long way from solving our problems because we are a long way from even seeing our problems. They are hard to see because they really are Deep Problems touching the roots of morality and logic. They will not be solved by those unwilling to question the very existence of government. How to govern others is not the question. Whether to govern others is the question and the answer is no.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    You’re moving in a good direction with your thoughts.

    A few things I disagree with:
    – IP is not necessarily bad in itself, but it needs to be time-limited, staggered based on ‘innovation height’, but even for the top works no longer than 20 or maybe 30 years.
    – You are actually talking about systems. The ultimate question on systems however is always: “What do we do about the [monopoly] system of The Rule of Law?” Which can only work if there is enforcement [at least of sentences/punishments], by some kind of… well actually government.

    they really are Deep Problems touching the roots of morality and logic.

    Yes!!!

    They will not be solved by those unwilling to question the very existence of government.

    Why not get more to the point, and state:
    They will not be solved by those unwilling to question their own morality.

  • @animalogic
    Great article, Ilana.
    "Dissident Americans take comfort in the fact that our lepper-like ouster—de-platforming, financial and other—is executed by private companies. Discrimination, aver the libertarian-minded among us, is the prerogative of private property. Or, so we console ourselves. We’re safe, for aggression for the sake of aggression, as we libertarians have long maintained, is the modus operandi of the state, not of free enterprise."
    I hope this suggests you have awoken from any libertarian delusions you retained?
    Oh, & it's not just a "bug" re "big tech" or whatever they're called. It's a feature of ALL capitalism. Strive always for functional or de facto monopoly, & blend private power with State power, so it's hard to distinguish one from the other (in practice they are virtually indistinguishable -- the "revolving door" is just one feature) .... & you have the
    21st C !!
    Hooray.....

    Replies: @Mikael_, @Silverstein

    It’s a feature of ALL capitalism. Strive always for functional or de facto monopoly

    So what’s your conclusion?
    That we should eliminate capitalism altogether??

  • The mob did not win! This is how the supposedly conservative FoxNews celebrated the supposed defeat of a supposed mob. See for yourself: FoxNews finally showed its true face during the election steal when it declared that Trump had lost the election long before any evidence in support of this thesis materialized. It is now...
  • @obwandiyag
    Read this again, boneheads:

    "Americans have been brainwashed into calling things they don’t like, or don’t understand, as “Socialist” or even “Marxist”. The sad reality is that most Americans sincerely believe that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Bernie Sanders are “socialists”, and when they see modern movies ridiculously filled with “minorities” and gender fluid freaks – this is a case of “cultural Marxism” (a totally meaningless term, by the way!). This is all utter nonsense, neither Marxism nor Socialism have anything to do with BLM, Antifa, Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer (in fact, Marxism places a premium on real law and order!)."

    Replies: @gay troll, @Mikael_, @anonymous, @John Regan, @Stocky Anglo

    Well just because someone declares something doesn’t let it become true.
    And no matter how often I read it [the quote], it doesn’t make any sense!

    Thanks for not cutting out early on the quote:

    Marxism places a premium on real law and order

    I mean that’s just in-your-face wrong. One could maybe argue such for Communism/Leninism as the practical attempt to implement Marxism, but that the theory of Marxism has that somehow built in to it is just indefensible Orwellian prose.

    I can’t take the time and space here to discuss Marxism

    is then just the ultimate cop-out.

    • Replies: @JM
    @Mikael_

    Yes, on this he is badly informed, or worse. Law and Order was only valued - and bent in the extreme - when they had State Power. Before then it was anything goes.

    Next he'll say they made a fetish of telling the truth, when - with the Bolsheviks - extreme exaggeration was serially resorted to.

    But he's right about the subversives - nor say mild reforms - not being Marxist.

  • There was a fascinating online panel discussion on Wednesday night on the Julian Assange case that I recommend everyone watch. The video is at the bottom of the page. But from all the outstanding contributions, I want to highlight a very important point made by Yanis Varoufakis that has significance for understanding current events well...
  • The left, given its principles, rarely resorts to this kind of deceit.

    Yeah, right. Rarely.

    And if someone from the left uses this kind of deceit, they are usually right-wingers wearing a leftist sheepskin. Because we all know the right lies all the time, and would honestly never state what they want!

    All this proves once again that there is nobody more deluded than a true leftist.

    • Agree: Wyatt, KenR
  • It is given to few countries to face a future without any bright sides. Those that have done so in the past, have usually confronted overwhelming external challenges, perhaps compounded by internal difficulties. In the case of the United States today, that is not the case. To be sure, there are external challenges with both...
  • @Curmudgeon
    @Mikael_

    The bankers are the globalists. I didn't say I liked anarchy I only pointed out that the socialism = communism mantra is bullshit. They are opposites. Socialists wanted to remove bankers from the equation and have real free trade - actual producers dealing directly with others - no middlemen. Finance capitalism is communism, just not the commune you think communism is.

    Replies: @Skeptikal, @Mikael_

    Well you cannot just make up your own definitions of socialism and communism, and then without even stating them present derived conclusions from it.

    “Well it seems to me the best philosophy that women have come up with so far is ‘Everybody gets the same.’ Which is the correct approach inside a family. But for societies it fails to account for differential productivity.”

    I’d say that describes nicely the foundation of socialism (even though that was not the intent of the speaker.)
    And communism/leninism is just a “solution” how to force that [socialism] on people.

    Finance “capitalism” only works [for a while] with fiat currencies, where the number of unfulfillable promises is unlimited – at least up to the point when people start to not care about such ‘promises’ anymore. But that means the “money” quickly becomes more and more fake, and in that way the ‘capital’ in capitalism also dissolves, so it’s not capitalism anymore.
    So I see the use of such a term ‘finance capitalism’ more as an attempt to muddy the waters even more, than to clearly define the issue.

    If you disagree with anything, please provide your concise definitions!

  • @Katrinka
    @Mikael_

    I'm looking at Panama.

    https://panamarelocationtours.com/living-in-panama#tab-con-5

    Panama is rated #1.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    I actually know a couple that lives in Panama, halfway up a high mountain so to get a more moderate climate.

    Nice place for [early] retirees. But the country is 100% US-controlled. Security by obscurity only works up to a point.
    Also not sure that is a country I would want to raise children in.

    • Replies: @TheTrumanShow
    @Mikael_


    "Also not sure that is a country I would want to raise children in."
     
    That is THE question. One can hide out just about anywhere, even under a log. But those with children will need to ask themselves if is that where and how they want to rear their children.
  • @Felix Krull
    @anyone with a brain

    Honest intelligent people will emigrate

    Where to? I take it you don't mean Mexico or Ghana?

    I'm always amazed at the entitlement with which Americans speak of emigrating, as if every white country in the world would be thrilled to have a large influx of Americans who fled their own (rather magnificent!) country rather than stand and fight. The globalists are not going to stop when they have destroyed America, America is just ahead of the curve. So why should we believe that you'd defend your new homeland if you don't even defend your native land?

    Europe is pretty fed up with mass migration, and it's not just about skin color, it's about foreign cultures establishing parallel societies on our soil. Better get your visa application in fast, before the walls go up.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    >Where to?
    It’s a rather easy progression of thoughts to figure that out.
    – as you want to escape US’ negative influence, the Five Eyes are ruled out immediately.
    – beyond that, all the US allies (which are actually vassals) drop off the list as well.
    – every country claiming to be neutral, but without the military might to defend themselves against US military adventurism, can be scratched too.
    – that leaves Russia or China (or countries either of those two have clearly stated to help defend by all means.. maybe Belarus makes the cut here.)

    Now to the second point, nobody would be thrilled to have a large influx of Americans, yes.
    But if [as an American] you’ve come to realize your patriotism is not to a country but to commonly agreed upon highest values, and you therefore consider yourself not an American but a Christian, you might be more welcomed in some places.

    (But are you implying Americans would establish parallel societies in Europe? Absolute hilarious!)

    • Replies: @Katrinka
    @Mikael_

    I'm looking at Panama.

    https://panamarelocationtours.com/living-in-panama#tab-con-5

    Panama is rated #1.

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • @Curmudgeon
    @Kratoklastes

    Thanks. I almost laughed when I read his "both of which seem to abound in the modern Democrat party" comment. Unfortunately, like most Americans, Mr. Sabrosky buys into the phony Marx narrative and the false left-right paradigm.
    The current Democrat party is statist, there is no question, just as Marx was a statist. However, Marxist centralization was compared to a Rothschild bank, by his socialist critics, who were anarchists, not statists, and did not consider Marx to be a socialist. Turns out Marx was a Rothschild 3rd cousin.
    Even if we accept the notion that the Democrat Party was "left" and full of communists, how do they compare to other communist regimes? Did the Soviet Bloc have open borders? Do China and North Korea have open borders?
    If the overwhelming majority of Americans cannot process that the only commune the Democrat Party is part of is the commune of international bankers, financial institutions, and globalist corporations, don`t expect them to understand anarchy.

    Replies: @Justvisiting, @Mikael_, @obwandiyag, @The Soft Parade

    That’s quite a word salad.
    Except that you dislike bankers and globalists and seem to like anarchy, I cannot take any straight thought out from it.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    @Mikael_

    The bankers are the globalists. I didn't say I liked anarchy I only pointed out that the socialism = communism mantra is bullshit. They are opposites. Socialists wanted to remove bankers from the equation and have real free trade - actual producers dealing directly with others - no middlemen. Finance capitalism is communism, just not the commune you think communism is.

    Replies: @Skeptikal, @Mikael_

  • The unexpected decision by Judge Vanessa Baraitser to deny a US demand to extradite Julian Assange, foiling efforts to send him to a US super-max jail for the rest of his life, is a welcome legal victory, but one swamped by larger lessons that should disturb us deeply. Those who campaigned so vigorously to keep...
  • While it’s a good step in itself, I cannot consider it a victory.

    To me it looks Baraitser has chosen the back-door exit, to cover her ass. And if you believe she did this on her own, without a nod from the US, I have a bridge I can sell to you.
    Now we’ll get the appeal, in truly Kafkaesque fashion “because we can.”

  • It is given to few countries to face a future without any bright sides. Those that have done so in the past, have usually confronted overwhelming external challenges, perhaps compounded by internal difficulties. In the case of the United States today, that is not the case. To be sure, there are external challenges with both...
  • anon[106] • Disclaimer says:

    “[Alan Ned Sabrosky] extends his heartfelt appreciation to Helen Buyinski of RT for her encouragement, advice and helpful suggestions.”

    Meet “Helen of Troy”, Agent of c.h.a.o.s., An (((Irish))) lass, working for (((Russia))) today, beeting drums of “Let’s see you Americans burn your own country down!”

    Learn to recognize Agitprop. Don’t waste your time on words of your enemies. This is called sound advice.

    (i had to look up alan – he actually looks like a useful idiot.)

    • Troll: Mikael_
    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
    @anon

    Yeah the author really leaves out the (((globalist))) angle. I do think that a civil war is possible, but it will likely be an engineered one, not an organic one.

    Replies: @Johnny Rico, @Neoconned

  • @Digital Samizdat
    @Yellowface Anon

    Right diagnosis, wrong cure. Once you realize that the real plan of the Davos oligarchy is to replace the US with the UN, then you'll see that breaking the country up into 50 smaller (and weaker) ones is exactly what they want. It would be better for us to seize power of the US govt., perhaps letting NY and CA go if they want, so that we could continue to have a Security Council veto at the UN, a seat at the IMF, etc., all of which we could use to destabilize and neutralize the NWO from within.

    But just turning America into Bosnia-Herzigovina would do nothing to stop the globalist scum, who would simply use their control of the rest of the world to destabilize, subvert and embargo us.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @Albion Moonlite, @TheJamesRocket

    While I agree with a lot you say,
    one thing self-contradicts a bit I think: What military power would that UN have, with the US military split up and/or disbanded, after a breakup of the states?

  • There are elements not included in this analysis. The Great Reset plans being most obvious.
    The systems that people rely upon for survival are under attack – cyber attack threatening power supplies, a huge food crisis is developing. The world moves towards a dystopia described in the fourth vision in the article, but not as some outcome of civil war, instead through a steady siege war already being conducted by social planners and elites upon a docile and brainwashed public.
    As I look around me, depressingly, I see people who are mostly incapable of any genuine critical thinking, they are so disconnected from physical realities that they have no experience of providing basic needs for themselves or of defending their own resources.
    Unless things take an almost unimaginable turn in direction, I think that people will for the most part stay at home as they are told, watching Netflix and playing Xbox, whilst the food queues grow and the vaccinations, digital money and surveillance become mandatory requirements for getting supplies.
    Drip, drip. It works.

    • Agree: Mikael_
    • Replies: @Hillaire
    @cranc

    Indeed, a sage post ,this article just describes the theatre and mind fuckery at play, you are describing the stark reality..

    As always the biggest problem is the people themselves and the delusion they actually have any agency or input.

    Trump will polish his sheriffs badge and waltz off into the distance, pelosi will reign in the 'squad', and the davos crowd will have you all in hutches eating soy gruel and beetleburger.

    anti-panties and aimless blacks are the least of your worries.

    Replies: @cranc

  • @Brian USA
    From Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies at the United States Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute, from an article:

    I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period.

    Brian USA: The Mossad is an Israel intelligence agency.

    Brian USA: The best way to remove the power of elite Jewish extremists, who control most of the media, the White House and Congress, is let Americans know Israel did the evil 911 event and the immoral, elite Jewish extremists who control the media and our politicians covered it up.

    Elite Jewish extremists who control the media, demonize White people with the absurd, phony, accusation of systemic racism, to further marginalize White people and destroy their power in the country White people built.

    Jewish extremists have controlled the United States for decades; they don’t want the White European Americans to revolt and kick them out of power so they're flooding the country (via the Jewish controlled media and politicians and the very deceptive Hart-Celler Jewish promoted immigration act from the 1960's) with people of color to lower the percentage of White people and the power of White people.

    It makes it easier to hide the power of elite Jews in the United States because with a large number of minority groups in the United States, when people think of minorities they don’t think of Jews. It’s a variation of divide and conquer, it’s divide and increase the power.

    Replies: @ANONymous, @Charles Carroll, @Mikael_, @thotmonger, @Anon

    That’s all very interesting,
    but as long as you painstakingly avoid to use the word Christianity, you’ve already lost the battle you are describing.

  • @Kratoklastes
    It's quite entertaining to see someone dismiss anarchism as anticipating a 'utopia', to then daub the walls with shit that has a one-line lietmotif:

    the US system of representative government has failed
     
    Anarchists don't expect a utopia to arise when the system fails, and anybody who claims otherwise is doing so in bad faith and marks themselves as ignorant or a shill (or both, but not neither).

    Anarchists expect a system where economic outcomes are generated by voluntary transactions.

    It's not expected that nobody ever again makes a mistake - just that losses that arise from such mistakes will not be able to be passed on to the polity while indemnifying the people making the mistake.

    It's not expected that nobody ever commits a crime: just that there is less likelihood that the system will have differential results for people depending on their proximity to political power.

    In other words, networks of private institutions that compete for business (security, dispute resolution etc) will generate superior outcomes to the existing (captured) government monopolies.

    Anyone who claims to genuinely believe that "monopoly leads to expensive, lower-quality products" is a contentious statement when it applies to government, believes in magical bureaucrats who, given possession of a monopoly, do not abuse it.

    That's an utterly utopian (and naïve, and stupid) view.

    There is absolutely no expectation of 'utopia' under anarchist principles: what is expected is a system that has a greater chance of being 'fair', than the system you just spent 1800 of your 1900 words whining about like a spoilt little bitch.

    Replies: @RoatanBill, @Brás Cubas, @Mikael_, @Curmudgeon, @BADmejr, @foolisholdman, @John Hagan, @ns supporter

    Hilarious.
    What you’re actually saying -but forget to mention-
    is your anarchic system will be entirely voluntary, which also means everyone reserves the right to reject any, just a little bit centralized, system of Rule of Law.
    Which leads to everybody has to for himself find out who he/she can trust or not. And dish out punishment for extreme misdeeds themselves, if deemed necessary.
    Which is actually very close to the ‘Rule of the Jungle’, or in more sophisticated terms ‘Bellum omnium contra omnes.’

    (If you see a variant how your anarchist system would still have a Rule of Law while not becoming a governed society, feel free to lay it out here.)

    Otherwise: Talk about naïve, and stupid.

    • Disagree: Bro43rd
    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
    @Mikael_

    Well said. The problem with so called anarchy is that nature abhors a vacuum. In this case a power vacuum; which WILL be filled by someone, if none is established.

    , @Kratoklastes
    @Mikael_

    So let's get this straight: you believe that there is no alternative to State structures for dispute resolution, community defence, and the like?

    There's 150 years of scholarship that disagrees with you. Competitive provision of security, dispute resolution and the like is a solved problem.

    In fact the entire Law Merchant worked for several centuries, despite having no enforcement power (especially across jurisdictions). People abided by the directions of this entirely-private dispute resolution mechanism, because if they failed to do so they would suffer reputational harm that would prevent them from doing business.

    That's the key: a variant of the totalitarian 'social credit score', but maintained by multiple competing firms and funded entirely by subscription. It imposes some small obligations for people to do due diligence before signing up - but so does any subscription.

    The entire State institutional edifice relies - quite critically - on fuckwits with a primary-school understanding of the way the world works. That is to say, people who lack the cognitive machinery to imagine that - for example - in the absence of a State monopoly for community defence, entrepreneurs will establish firms that furnish security.

    Those firms will compete: since competition through providing a good value proposition is far less costly than competition through violence, firms will not 'go to war' with each other. (Hint: without a mandatory tax base or zero-premium access to debt markets, the 'most warlike' security firm will be driven to bankruptcy within a few iterations).

    The current market for private security is massive - that should be a hint that the State is failing to furnish security. 'Failing' is actually the wrong term here: it implies they're making an unsuccessful attempt, but they're not.

    If you had anything worth protecting, you would be a fucking moron if you relied on State police forces to protect it. These days if you don't have cameras and an alarm system that links to a private-sector security firm that does have a duty of care, you pretty much don't have anything worth stealing.

    State police forces are specifically indemnified from any duty of care towards We The Livestock: the case law on that goes all the way back to South v Maryland 59 U.S. 396 (1855), so you've had 150 years to become aware of it.

    Some case studies: you can be in the basement on the phone to the police as home intruders are upstairs raping your room-mate, and if the police fail to respond that's not a violation of any professional obligation. (That's the facts-situation in Warren v. District of Columbia 444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981)

    Or you can have a restraining order against an ex-partner, and State police can ignore repeated calls after he kidnaps the kids - and later the ex-partner is killed in a shootout with police and the corpses of your 3 kids are found in his car. (That's the facts situation behind Castle Rock v. Gonzales 545 U.S. 748 (2005))

    Or you can telephone the police about your weird neighbour, and ask that he be investigated because you think there's a very good chance that he's a notorious serial killer. When he kills you two weeks later, the courts later find that the police can't be expected to follow up on your call. (That's the facts situation behind Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1987] UKHL 12, [1989] AC 53)

    So tell me how a competitive market for security provision would result in worse outcomes - bear in mind that these cases set the bar for all subsequent events of a similar nature.

    In particular, tell me what mechanisms private security providers would use to get out of compensation claims if they failed to fulfil their contractual obligations. (Ch 11? Sorry... that's a State doctrine). Imagine the reputational damage that would happen if a private firm breached its contract in a similar way and then failed to abide by a DRO direction to compensate.

    *

    It is a mark of utter ignorance to quote Hobbes; it assumes that man is not inherently a social animal. If Hobbes' thesis was remotely correct and man is vile... why the fuck would anybody expect the people running the government to be of a superior moral type?

    Hobbes was a fucking retard. Leviathan is a piss-poor apologia for the claimed obligation for people to funnel value upwards to the human vermin who seek to rule; the fact that its value qua apologia is why it receives a strong imprimatur from the powerful is lost on people who lack the appropriate wetware.

    Nobody is saying that dimbulbs like you can't continue to give 50% of your output to a group of grasping, conniving cunts who have no obligation to fulfil their side of the contract. Knock yourself out - just don't expect anyone with half a brain to subscribe to the same bullshit.

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • As part of wokedom’s fantasy-ridden fascination with indigenes, sports teams, such as the Redskins and Braves, race to change names. (For Washington’s team, the Federal Folders has been suggested.) Outraged conservatives see the changes as nauseating prissiness by historically illiterate ninnies. It is every bit of this. Still, the teams should be renamed. What civilized...
  • Nice revisionist history.

    Note I’m not saying anything in those books is false, just that the complete black-or-white categorization and lack of any ambiguity (at least according to Fred’s description)
    makes it just another “history is a series of lies agreed upon” variant.

  • In this "summary" post on Corona 2020, I will cover some of the following. Recap what we know about Corona, what we have learned in the past year, and what policies should have been undertaken; The big picture of global excess mortality that is emerging for 2020; Discuss the vaccines, "vaccine geopolitics", and Corona's impact...
  • To be straight about this, you make a lot of good points.

    But I have to put in a list the things you state without any evidence:
    – “10 megadeaths” (on current trajectory, including vaccinations. Even Burn-Murdoch can give no support to such a claim; see also 4th point below. Also you are ignoring the “low-hanging fruit” view – how many of the persons most susceptible to bad outcomes have already been hit? A first vs. second wave severity comparison seems to give credence to that view. Also what about the possibility of near future sub-par death numbers, and their effect on life expectancy?)
    – “no pre-existing herd immunity” (Are you trying to imply there was also zero pre-existing immunity? Impossible to prove or disprove without highly unethical experiments, but critical thinking should strongly doubt that number is zero or even close to zero)
    – “mass variolation” (I had also for three weeks liked that idea, until I realized we have no idea about the long-term aftereffects of Corona on surviving patients!)
    – “third-world undercounting” (of deaths!? Those require zero sophisticated technology to count and report.)

    You completely ignore:
    – critical thinking on mRNA

    I also see a lot of trolling in your article. Although you give lip service to criticizing leftoids, it is clear you believe you can virtue signal your better understanding (and higher IQ) by cheap-shots on clueless folks who at least tried to think for themselves (you get my stab at leftoid NPCs here?)

    Overall more a letdown than a epiphany of an article.

    • Replies: @Donald A Thomson
    @Mikael_

    “mass variolation” (I had also for three weeks liked that idea, until I realized we have no idea about the long-term aftereffects of Corona on surviving patients!)

    At last, one of the few who seems to have noticed this. It looked ok at the start and, despite some unsettling indications, it may still turn out to be ok but what a hell of a gamble on the long term effects of a new disease. [email protected]

  • 2021, the centennial of Mao’s founding of the Communist Party, was long planned to be a breakout year. When the Party took power in 1949, China was the poorest country on earth, which makes these achievements the more remarkable: GDP will expand by 10%. Western experts predict 8% and, since their predictions are always low,...
  • China: Ten Predictions for 2021, AKA

    Video Link
    They won’t do it of course, and so politically and economically, China is the big winner from a world wide catastrophe created by China. That is really going to make them careful with Artificial General Intelligence. I suppose we now know how the world is going to end.

    • Troll: Mikael_
  • This is one of the better articles on China I’ve read in awhile.

    https://adamtooze.substack.com/p/chartbook-newsletter-9

    It covers the increased role of State Owned Enterprises in the Chinese economy with alternate views on if this is a good thing or a bad thing.

    – One would assume that SOE would decrease as China modernized since SOE’s have a bad reputation for productivity.

    – Instead China is increasing its use of SOE’s with the stated goals of derisking the financial system, curbing the oligarchs, trying to extract more value with public/private partnerships, and relying on the rule of law to govern what is an increasingly complex economy.

    Relying on the rule of law is the most interesting part here. It shows that China is not really governed by ideology, but more so by practicality.

    If you think about it, China is facing the same kind of problems the American economy is facing. Chinas solution which focuses on the rule of law, curbing elites, and derisking financial markets sound exactly like what America should do.

    The way China is mixing the state and private sector is also interesting. Instead of allowing Pharma to buy Washington, the US could instead rely on private/public partnerships in sectors where the private market extracs too much wealth from the country such as our Pharma companies.

    America is gearing up to fight a China that is no longer communist and increasingly does capitalism better than America.

    • Replies: @Marshal Marlow
    @Tor597

    Having seen the inexplicably enormous prices charged by western companies when tendering for major infrastructure construction, I can't help but wonder whether there's a good argument for states to maintain an in-house capability to undertake major construction. Same for procuring military equipment.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga

    , @showmethereal
    @Tor597

    SOE's are in certain sectors - especially dealing with energy and transport and such. But private businesses provide the bulk of economic growth and employment in China. That threshold was crossed 20 years ago. But yes it is interesting how SOE's have stayed relevant. For instance - there is no way China could have built such a large HSR network if SOE's didn't run it. Same with subways. Xian is on it's way to having almost as many subway mileage by 2025 than NYC. That's something that couldn't have been done either if it weren't for SOE's that standardized construction and equipment - which speeds things up and lowers costs.. Just like HSR - China now has more subways than the whole world.
    So SOE's help build up the country - but the private firms add the dynamism.

  • It sure looks like Biden will take over the White House one way or another, and while Trump and his supporters might still try a few things, the political correlation of forces inside the US ruling classes is clearly against Trump. As for the “deplorables” - they have been neutralized by stealing the election. Which...
  • @Felix Keverich
    Russia remains vulnerable to Western efforts at political subversion. And Democrats excel at this. Remember, it was during the presidency of Barack Obama when Putin faced toughest challenge to his rule. I'm talking, of course, about Bolotnaya protests.

    These days millions of Russian kids watch political videos, promoted by Youtube, where they are being taught, that their country sucks and there is no hope for their lives whatsoever unless they overthrow Putin. Russian politicians do not use the internet and appear completely oblivious to this danger. They're a bit like Saker to be honest: obsessed with their tank divisions and rockets, dinosaurs preparing for yesterday's war. They risk finding themselves in Lukashenka's position.

    Replies: @Seraphim, @goldgettin, @Carlos22, @Mikael_, @Let it be..., @Tsigantes, @Trickster, @Так и есть, @Johnny Smoggins, @Derer

    Nice display of your brainwashedness, from western propaganda.
    You didn’t follow Saker’s link to the machine translated example, did you?

    One would need a bit more than broad, completely unsubstantiated claims by you that Russian kids in large numbers actually believe those YT lies and similar.
    And Lukashenko isn’t doing so bad, currently.

  • Let’s hit the road in the search for the real Jesus. Galilee, Year 27: baptized by an itinerant preacher, John the Baptist. That’s when the story really begins. We know virtually nothing of his life till then. Galilee is ruled by shabby client kings of the Roman empire – first Herod, then his son Herod...
  • @Kratoklastes
    @Dr. Robert Morgan


    There is a Darwinism not just of biological organisms, but of ideas too. Christianity had superior “reproductive fitness” and so took over the West, while Stoicism and Cynicism became extinct.
     
    The idea of applying the theory of natural selection to ideas was one of Richard Dawkins' insights. Apart from being a prominent atheist, Dawkins is also the person who invented the concept of the meme as a thing that attempts to propagate itself among minds, the same way that genes attempt to propagate themselves among meatbags.

    We have been encouraged to misunderstand Darwin, and to infer that adaptation to a given environment as evidenced by reproductive success ('fitness') is the same as 'qualitative superiority'.

    In the same way, we have misunderstood Dawkins and conflated memetic reproductive success with truth.

    It is only recently - with mind-invasions by objectively stupid ideas being observable in real time[1] - that is has become plain that the truth is at a distinct disadvantage in memetic natural selection.

    Bad ideas that hit the right rhetorical note are to memes, what subsidised reproduction of the bottom quintile is to genes.

    If the two things happen in tandem, you're on the road back to the Dark Ages - unless we get really lucky and a genuine global pandemic conducts a eugenic cull of the West's gigantic herds of obese tattooed ignorant fucktards.


    [1] Think of the type of anti-scientific drivel that has 'gone viral': climate cultism; trans-cultism and such like. We can watch bad ideas infect 90IQ minds by counting retweets.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    Always so funny, when someone like you at first lists many clear-sighted observations,
    but at the end takes him-/herself completely out of the discussion by undershooting even the 90IQ minds with drivel such as “eugenic cull.”

  • Pepe is projecting his marxist worldview onto the phenomenon of the spiritual Jesus. There is more to the world than meets your eye Pepe:

    Jesus focused on the imminence of God’s kingdom.

    Wrong! Jesus taught the ‘immanence’ of God’s Kingdom:

    When He was asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, He answered them, “The kingdom of God does not come with observation. Nor will they say, ‘Here it is!’ or ‘There it is!’ For remember, the kingdom of God is within you.”

    Luke 17:20-21

    The good news Jesus preached for 3 years was this: “God is within us all, seek and you shall find.

    • Disagree: Mikael_
  • @Observator
    In the earliest Gospels, the synoptics, Jesus is depicted as an exorcist faith healer. His carefully managed “miracles” attracted a following among the unsophisticated rustics of rural Galilee. For his part, Jesus asserted (no fewer than ninety-three times in the four Gospels) that he was the enigmatic “Son of Man” of ancient legend. This mythic figure from the book of Daniel was not divine, but an intermediary between god and man. Jesus stated unequivocally that he had come “not to replace the Law and the Prophets, but to fulfill them” (Matthew 5:17). Jesus held that his mission was to purify and prepare only his fellow Jews for what he believed was the imminent return of Yahweh (Matthew 24 and 25, Mark 13, Luke 21), who would again smite Israel’s enemies as he did in the old sagas to establish his kingdom on earth.

    We know today that Jesus’ allegedly novel moral principles were not original with him, but were adaptations or paraphrases of contemporary Jewish thought hastily cobbled together for the end times emergency. His unrealistic exhortations to “turn the other cheek”, to love one's enemies, to give away all one’s possessions and so on, clearly show his perspective that this world was about to pass away - during the lifetimes of his audience, he stated - so that practical strategies for daily living were no longer important.

    This longed-for “kingdom of god” would not consist simply of Jews happily freed from foreign oppression, but would see them at last installed in their rightful place “to rule the nations with a rod of iron” as the chosen people of a jealous god who claimed do-minion over all humanity. This is the core expectation of the Messiah myth of what Christianity calls the Old Testament. Jesus saw it as his mission to bring about perfect obedience to the law (Matthew 5:48) among “only the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 15:24). The Gospel account of Jesus' initial refusal to heal the child of a Palestinian woman (Matthew 15:21), because he did not waste his magic on "dogs", shows Jesus' acceptance of the intolerant ethnocentrism of Judaism.

    Some scholars today maintain that Jesus’ words and deeds demonstrate his strikingly unique cult-belief about himself, that he was the incarnation of the mythic perfect Paschal lamb. Animated by this idea, Jesus contrived to violate a Roman law which carried the death penalty so he could offer his own body as blood sacrifice, not on a Jewish altar as in days of old, but on a Roman cross. A folk-memory of this transgression likely survives in the garbled narrative of Jesus' symbolic attack on the money changers at the Temple, which was a heavily guarded facility that doubled as the national treasury, the very heart of state power. Jesus imagined this gesture would be so pleasing to Yahweh that it would move the deity to return in power at the very hour of his execution, just as he intervened at the last moment to stay the hand of Abraham when about to sacrifice his son Isaac. But Yahweh failed to take notice and Jesus perished in ignominy. Jesus’ agonized final words, “father, why have you abandoned me?” are as moving a testament as you will find anywhere in literature to the tragic consequences of religious fanaticism.

    Replies: @gay troll, @Mikael_

    Astute demonstration that you are unable to see the forest for the trees, even though you point out so many nicely observed details.

    Hint: reflect on the tragic consequences of perfectism.

  • Mr. Escobar’s take here is almost as depressing as the comments here. The fact is, Jesus did not come to bring a political message, he deliberately eschews such statements. He tells the Jews to pay taxes, but he then uses this as a metaphor for how they are to serve God.

    As for what the “Kingdom of Heaven/God” that Jesus is constantly talking about is the one that all the Jews had been waiting for. They had been waiting for the Son of David, the Messiah. This man would come and save them. What exactly this salvation looked like was not clear, but the Jews were convinced it would be a full restoration of the Davidic kingdom. They would be restored to self-rule and they would dominate the gentiles in their kingdom and beyond.

    However, Jesus brought them a spiritual and ecclesiastical kingdom, not a political and military one. He was not the man they wanted. Escobar is right when he says that Jesus antagonized and threatened the power of the corrupt Jewish elites, the Sanhedrin, by challenging their legitimacy. He told people that they were hypocrites and evil, and he was totally right. Since they couldn’t refute him, they killed him.

    And for those of you who refuse to believe that Christ was a miracle worker or possessed supernatural powers, note that He not only predicts His own death at the hands of the Jews, but the destruction of the Temple (Matthew 24:1-25:46). And since we know the Gospels were written before Roman Jewish war and the Temple’s destruction, along with the sack of Jersualem, we know this is an authentic prophecy. Plus, in his trial, Jesus says that He will come in judgement to destroy the Sanhedrin, comparing himself to the Son of Man (who is identified with God) mentioned in the book of Daniel. This is the blasphemy for which he is charged, though the trial was illegal. And Christ is correct, and in 70 AD, the Jews are judged and their leadership is ground beneath the heel of Rome.

    • Agree: Mikael_
    • Replies: @Chilqiyyah
    @Prince Leo

    Blessed art Thou Prince Leo.

    Blessed is the Christ dwelling in you, the Hope of Glory Colossians 1:26-27

    Speak Christ
    Christ is Truth
    Christ is a Man
    Christ is God in Man.

    Replies: @Olwein Ollie

    , @Metachronic
    @Prince Leo

    Leo wins the POV of the Christmas Rashomon, for me. The effect Jesus / Yeshua had on the cruel lawmakers of the Jewish society of the millennium was unprecedented. I will make my bottom line up front - its Christmas an I won't spend much time on this - but Jesus' political mission was obvious. To upset the order of profit making from the pretense of holiness, yes - but hs message to the Pharisees and the observant Jews was always consistent. There is one law now - the law of love for each other under God - and if that is followed, you - and all humanity - no longer need be enslaved by the laws of the Pharisees or of Rome. The lawyers lose, forever. One simple trick. One law to obviate the thousands pf laws the Talmudists have made, and still produce in our courts and legislatures. The law of simple faith in love, and living one's life with integrity from this law (as if it were the only law) leads to a life unworried by the snares and avarice of law binding. (How many times did Jesus say "woe to you scribes and Pharisees?")

    To those that believe the works are fiction, they are trusting that only manuscripts explain the rise of the world's most expansive religious belief system, that led Rome and Byzantium, cathedrals and universities, Western civilization and inspired the human spiritual genius of Bach, Shakespeare, Michelangelo, Kennedy.

    To explain away the source of direct inspiration as cognitive dissonance gravely mistakes the meaning making of humanity. We didn't come here to lament late-civilization's dearth of spiritual enchantment. I still have and teach mine, and feel sorry for the materialists here. To me that's the lie of the Jewish faith - which is primarily a set of rules with enforced prayer. Has there been a true Jewish mystic since Christ?

    A faith that exists just to follow the law is not a spiritual faith at all, but based on the idea that God spoke once and the reception of the Word was perfect. A living faith or religion is a mystery and requires the follower to follow the unknown, not the known, not faith by "citing sources." One can, and many still do, spend a lifetime studying original and ancient works and words directly. The canonical Gospels are an exoteric body of word, they have been translated over 2000 years, they are not the primary texts.

    I still accept Pascal's wager. Peace -

    , @Kratoklastes
    @Prince Leo


    And since we know the Gospels were written before Roman Jewish war and the Temple’s destruction, along with the sack of Jersualem, we know this is an authentic prophecy.
     
    We know no such thing.

    In fact we know the exact opposite: the earliest extant fragments - FRAGMENTS - of the 'Gospels' are from the early to mid 2nd century.

    P52 is the fragment I have in mind, and it's a fragment of the weird-ass "I wrote it when I was tripping balls" gospel of JOHN, which is basically Jeebus-free (except if by 'Jeebus' we mean the mythical figure who rides dragons and shoots fire from his tongue which is also a sword).

    Bullshitters always bet on the audience not calling them out. I'm calling you out, bullshitter.


    It's not hard to make a prophecy after the event: I prophesy that the S&P500 will hit a low of 666 in March 2009 (let's assume I wrote that in April 2004).

    Replies: @JasonT

    , @Seraphim
    @Prince Leo

    ''My Kingdom is not of this world''.

    "Then those men, when they had seen the miracle that Jesus did [the multiplication of the five loaves and two fishes], said, This is of a truth that prophet that should come into the world. 15 When Jesus therefore perceived that they would come and take him by force, to MAKE HIM A KING, he departed again into a mountain himself alone... They said therefore unto him, What sign shewest thou then, that we may see, and believe thee? what dost thou work? 31 Our fathers did eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world. 34 Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread. 35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst. 36 But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not. 37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out. 38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. 39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day. 40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day. 41 The Jews then murmured at him, because he said, I am the bread which came down from heaven. 42 And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven? 43 Jesus therefore answered and said unto them, Murmur not among yourselves. 44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day... I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world. 52 The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat? 53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. 54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. 55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. 56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. 57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me. 58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever'' (John 6).

  • @Ann Nonny Mouse
    @Mikael_

    Mikael, on my reading the answer to that is pretty clear, per Acts. Paul goes to many synagogues in Anatolia, Macedonia and Greece and always addresses, explicitly, two groups of people. The first, probably one in ten, the Jews: the others, nine in every ten in the synagogue, the Believers, i.e. Gentiles who were enthusiastic about Judaism, were rushing to the synagogues in large numbers, but were deterred, perhaps by Judaism's close legalistic controls, circumcision etc. and then they found Paul had a very impressive, convincing, and nice, not nasty, monotheism, and went for it.

    Replies: @follyofwar, @Mikael_

    Ann,
    both you and follyofwar replying to you talk about very specific practical details.

    I’m concerned about the (unwritten) rules behind all things, the meta-physics, which underlie all [sustainable] developments.
    As I see it, Christianity put an extra twist in its meta-interpretation -which can at first glance be seen as a weakness-, with which it surpassed Judaism.

  • OK Pepe –
    now in a follow-up piece (maybe for next Christmas?) tell us
    how Christianity surpassed Judaism!

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
    @Mikael_

    Mikael, on my reading the answer to that is pretty clear, per Acts. Paul goes to many synagogues in Anatolia, Macedonia and Greece and always addresses, explicitly, two groups of people. The first, probably one in ten, the Jews: the others, nine in every ten in the synagogue, the Believers, i.e. Gentiles who were enthusiastic about Judaism, were rushing to the synagogues in large numbers, but were deterred, perhaps by Judaism's close legalistic controls, circumcision etc. and then they found Paul had a very impressive, convincing, and nice, not nasty, monotheism, and went for it.

    Replies: @follyofwar, @Mikael_

  • In March, I wrote about what I think should be done. My ideas included building power locally, moving to the country, and promoting secession within states. Some of these things are happening. There are movements to build a “greater Idaho,” to expel Chicago from Illinois, and to have parts of Virginia join West Virginia. However,...
  • @Justvisiting
    @Mikael_


    I’m not convinced that copying our enemies by going full Alinskiyite is a long-term winning strategy.
     
    Alinsky tactics were not designed to be a long-term strategy.

    They are short-term tactics to destabilize the enemy.

    Once the enemy is destabilized, then you can force them to give you some autonomy as discussed in the original article.

    Otherwise, they will just ignore you and put the boot in your face.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    Aren’t you just dancing around an elephant?

    The glaring contradiction is that using a short-term tactic without announcing it as such, will hamper you massively when trying to sell your long-term strategy as a viable moral foundation later.

    It’s the usual ‘fighting for peace’ or ‘f**king for virginity’ fallacy.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    @Mikael_


    The glaring contradiction is that using a short-term tactic without announcing it as such,
     
    Agreed--we should be "announcing it as such".

    We are going to frack up the enemy at times and places and techniques of our choosing--the rules are there are no rules....this is a temporary tactic to get them to the negotiating table....there, I "announced" it.

    Replies: @Justvisiting

  • @John Pepple
    Tactically, it’s a mistake to focus on whites. You immediately get called a Nazi and so you find yourself on the defensive. But if you focus on poor whites, you can put the elites on the defensive. “I’m for poor whites and against you loathsome Marie Antoinettes.” Say that and their first reaction will be defensive. “What do you mean when you say that we are Marie Antoinettes?” And then you explain that they refuse to acknowledge the lack of wealth privilege of poor whites, just like Marie Antoinette, and instead want to talk only about their racial privilege. They will then have to justify their position, and some will, after thinking about it, even side with us, to an extent. They will say, “I guess we have gone too far in wanting poor whites to check their white privilege instead of talking about their lack of wealth privilege.”

    Moreover, rich whites who support the Democrats are hopeless. They have nothing to lose by supporting the Dems, but a lot to lose if they support someone like Trump. So, forget about them and concentrate on poor whites.

    Poor whites are mostly already against what is happening in the country politically. They prefer Trump to most Dems. Just keep on emphasizing how awful the Marie Antoinettes are and how they hate poor whites.

    Replies: @TheTrumanShow, @Mikael_, @Twodees Partain, @Sin City Milla

    While on the surface your argument is sound,
    I’m not convinced that copying our enemies by going full Alinskiyite is a long-term winning strategy.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    @Mikael_


    I’m not convinced that copying our enemies by going full Alinskiyite is a long-term winning strategy.
     
    Alinsky tactics were not designed to be a long-term strategy.

    They are short-term tactics to destabilize the enemy.

    Once the enemy is destabilized, then you can force them to give you some autonomy as discussed in the original article.

    Otherwise, they will just ignore you and put the boot in your face.

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • @GeeBee
    @onebornfree

    You're an anarchist without a plan. I would not choose to live in any society with you anywhere near the controls - if that's not actually a contradiction in terms...

    Replies: @Grand Inquisitor, @Mikael_

    Yawn, another one of those bullshiffers who accuse others of proposing anarchy, along the line:
    “Without a [benevolent] government leading the sheeple, there would be total chaos everywhere!”

    Can’t you come up with any less straw-manning argument?

  • Sidney Powell is emerging as a pivotal figure among those sounding the alarm that the United States is forfeiting its claim to be anything like a democratic country subject to the rule of law. Like Rudolf Giuliani, Powell has been a federal prosecutor. Unlike Giuliani, Powell has made one thing abundantly clear. She will not...
  • Conspiracy theorists tend to think of themselves as smart, better informed people than most people, them being one step ahead from the rest of us. But from what I have seen recently, they are the dumbest, most gullible people on earth.

    North Carolina was the last swing state that was called. Surprisingly, there were no reports of fraud, no dead people voting, no missing ballots boxes, no “dumps”, no protests, no hearings. The voting machines apparently worked just fine.

    Only a dumb gullible person would believe that the fact that North Carolina was called for Trump has nothing to do with it and that Trump’s strategy, which he declared in advance and which is often employed by sulking toddlers and sore losers, was to call fraud on every swing state he lost.

    Only the dumbest most gullible person would believe that a president with an approval ratings of 42%, that all polls had indicated was about to lose (including Fox News poll), was actually about to win all swing states, and win the elections in a landslide, and therefore the elections were stolen from him.

    Only the dumbest most gullible person would send his money to the Trump Defense Fund, which can be used for anything the grifter in chief pleases, and only part of it was used to fund frivolous meritless lawsuits without a scintilla of evidence by the nincompoop Giuliani and his clown show for $20k/day.

    Only the dumbest most gullible person believes that if someone says “I saw something”, that is a smoking gun and proof of fraud, and there’s no need for courts, cross examination or an opportunity for the defense to demonstrate that what that person saw (and assuming he is not lying) is a lot more mundane than the grand conspiracy he imagined.

    I could go on and on but I’ll leave it at that. Anybody who falls for Trump’s grift is the dumbest most gullible person, not the sophisticated, informed person that he thinks himself to be.

    • Replies: @Majority of One
    @Conspiracy Buster

    Only the dumbest and most gullible persons would cite opinion polls as having any possible degree of validity. It wouldn't surprise me if you have several letters assembled as a tail swinging behind your surname.

    , @Just another serf
    @Conspiracy Buster

    You will soon become acquainted with the rigger Ruby Freeman and her lovely daughter. The very tip of this election fraud iceberg.

    https://youtu.be/Zx1TBzLqmf4

    , @Emslander
    @Conspiracy Buster

    Those are certainly the alternative arguments. I'll only answer one, which is the idea that a president with a 42 percent approval rating can't win.

    1. He can win if he faces an opponent whose reputation and "approval" rating is literally in the basement. People always vote for a person for president, not an idea.

    2. The approval rating is always interpreted as being a reflection of progressive accomplishments, not conservative approval. People who want authoritative leaders would have lots of problems with Trump, but would vote for him in view of the alternative.

    Replies: @Skeptikal

  • @Majority of One
    @Mikael_

    So apparently we have arrived at an "agree to disagree" positioning as per spirituality vs religion. My perspective, as you appear to have recognized, is universalistic rather than particular. True,spiritual centered perspectives are more fluid--that's an agreed upon given.

    I would heartily disagree that these broad-scaled, even cosmic articulations are a "grab-bag of thoughts". For that we must deviate from the Newtonian, Cartesian, Marxist imposition which permeates official academic intellectualism and access a zone which those types abhor, a nexus where intuition, faith in this being a perhaps holographic projection of Creator, ever expansive and eternally questing and creating.

    The core human project as I perceive it is to become co-creators as individualized extensions of the ONE whom the Lakota people dare only to describe as "Wakan Tanka", the Great Mystery. I groove with that. To me, manmade religious formulations are ultimately hubristic and evermore tend towards control of the individual by a priestcraftly elite. That elitism also extends to the atheists and the irreligious, who have dominated Western thought since the "Enlightenment".

    One of my most profoundly postulated disagreements with BOTH religionists and rationalistic materialists centers my faith in our being individualized extensions of Creator's own being. As Jesus pointed out, we must look WITHIN to connect with "the Father"---an essence he never appears to conflate with the hateful, bloodthirsty Hebrew tribal WarGod "YHWH" or Yahweh. This understanding is critical to understanding of the difference between those Jesusites who endeavored to follow what the Lakota called "The Red Road" or better understood to us as the spirit path, with those who are Trinitarian Christian believers.

    We are spirits, living a three-dimensional material lifetime. As extensions of Creator, we too are of eternal spirit.

    My biggest beef with the totally impositional Roman Christianity is the fact that Eusebius and the gang were evidently ordered by Constantine to remove all references to reincarnation from the "Holy Book" they edited, redacted, extrapolated and interpolated. This removal of an essential element of the spirit path was deemed essential to imposition of the mythos of Jesus dying on the cross to "save us from our sins" and that failure to BELIEVE this particular trope would land us in eternal Hellfire and Damnation. To that line I will ever say "BullShit". It's all about control over the people by that priestcraftly elite on behalf of the imperial agenda.

    According to ancient traditions to be found within the phantasmagoria of Hinduism, we currently reside in Kali Yuga, the Iron Age---an era in which the scum, rather than the cream of humanity rises to the top. I do believe, Mikael, that we can concur that this is not an inapt description of our current cultural condition.

    Materialistic rationalists have denounced Astrology as being "unscientific" or even anti-science. Yet, the 26,000 year cycle of the Precession of the Equinoxes tells me that the figure of Jesus (sign of the fish embraced by the original Jesusites) was the archetype for the Age of Pisces.


    It remains not inconceivable that we happen to be in the final stages of the Kali Yuga and may, should the Awakening continue to prosper, transition into a whole nother dimensional reality, a renaissance of the general human spirit where Real-I-Zations will actualize those brief multidimensional excursions some of us have taken through the use of entheogens.

    Nuclear Metaphysics: One is All and All is One. The Whole is equal to AND greater than the sum of its parts.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @Emslander

    To set the record correct

    [Mikael_ wrote:]
    spirituality […] can become a grab bag of thoughts

    And you didn’t touch at all on my Christian key point ‘[Large-scale] Perfection is not possible in this [earthly] world’,
    but at the same time happily posit

    manmade religious formulations are ultimately hubristic
    […] elitism

    without addressing the contradiction [to that key point.]
    (BTW Do you actually agree with me that all religious formulations are manmade?)

    I assume I am more on the extreme end of that thought spectrum, but I have come to find not just Humanism (or whatever you want to call ‘human rights’ and ‘scientism’ of today’s technocratic society), but also underlying Enlightenment to be aberrations of truthful philosophy/theology. But that’s a topic for an entirely separate thread.

    I once watched an Orthodox Christian Archpriest state “…to accept the idea that God can be anything but power. Christianity presents a paradoxical view of God as weakness. God is frailty.”
    An absolutely mind-blowing viewpoint to me, at the time. Compare to other religions.

    Jesus didn’t save us from our sins. He only stated categorically that there is a way out from our sins (and those of our forefathers), by that if we truly work for our betterment our old sins will be forgiven. Meaning there is reason for hope, as we are not stuck in the dead end of Gnostic thought, among other things.

    Flogging the dead horse Eusebius (or any other ‘showcase villain’) doesn’t change the fact that the ‘ossified’ Bible would never have been perfect, no matter what.

    You wrote in the beginning “My perspective […] is universalistic”;
    I had stated “spirituality puts less emphasis on having an as-singular-and-simple-as-possible foundation [than religion]” and I have now highlighted in bold the distinguisher, for me.
    I have so far not identified any major flaws in the foundational ideas of Christianity, as applied to this earthly world.
    Haggling over our understanding of the afterworld, where large-scale perfection is possible again (and spirits can live eternally), is a relatively pointless exercise to me – as it has no influence on my thought process on how to act in the earthly world.

  • The political economy of the Digital Age remains virtually terra incognita. In Techno-Feudalism, published three months ago in France (no English translation yet), Cedric Durand, an economist at the Sorbonne, provides a crucial, global public service as he sifts through the new Matrix that controls all our lives. Durand places the Digital Age in the...
  • @follyofwar
    As a teenager in the late 60's I read Ayn Rand's "The Fountainhead," and, for a few years, became a devotee, until reality hit me in the face. Rand worshiped manly-men who would never bow down to authority, as exemplified by her architect protagonist Howard Roark. Rand came from an earlier era, when capitalists used to make things. She abhorred crony capitalism, which our once free market system has devolved into. Far from being "the intellectual guru of the new frontier" (as Pepe describes her), I think she would have looked at the victory of finance capitalism with disgust.

    Rand's heroes Roark and John Galt ("Atlas Shrugged") were strong fearless men of great accomplishment, who would never have comprised their principles for money. Soy boys Zuckerberg and Dorsey never built anything, never got their hands dirty, and are dependent upon crony capitalism and government protection (via Section 230 of the Communications Act) of their unearned multi-billion dollar empires. I'd submit that the working class heroes Rand envisioned and today's financial billionaires are complete opposites.

    And I don't get Escobar's propping up lifetime heroin addict and pervert William Burroughs as some kind of visionary thinker. I tried to read "Naked Lunch" and found it undigestible drivel. No matter, Pepe, in spite of this negative review, I still love your writing!

    Replies: @Justvisiting, @Mikael_

    I read something very different out of “Atlas Shrugged.”
    Most of it -not all- has passed the test of time.

    Good:
    Hank Rearden is the archetypal man striving for the appreciation of his mother (even by his choice of wife), but never getting it. He is able to (somewhat) break out of her spell over the course of the book.
    Ayn describes so clear-sightedly the typical self-destruction of: true socialism (“tragedy of the commons”), and authority structures when deceit and irresponsibility [stay quiet when you should speak up] take over, especially top-down (give the order to drive the steam locomotive into the long uphill tunnel to one person after another, until you find someone dumb enough to do it while all others who know better stay quiet.) Only years later I found indications she just varied stories of real events (often in the US!) from a few years before. But still true.
    John Galt is the cold-hard truth teller. To correct the ridiculous straw-manning by Pepe above (“altruism is evil”), Ayn Rand through John Galt correctly points out that unlimited altruism without reciprocity is self-defeating. With that -formerly common sense- she hit bulls-eye, also compare to ‘white guilt’ nowadays.

    Strong Caveats:
    Ayn Rand’s “solutions” are hocus-pocus. (Took me 10 years to realize that.)
    Galt’s Gulch is the aggrandized teenager dream of building a treehouse and retreating into it. That doesn’t work because in reality the mob will come after you, as you cannot effectively hide forever. And if you plan to first build undefeatable hiding/cloaking devices or something like that, you just went from bad to worse by replacing permanent self-isolation with god-like fantasies. But problems of a certain size require you to [try to] work together with a large group of people.
    Second, as a man I now can state that perfectism oozes out of Dagny’s pores. Such a woman doesn’t, and never did, exist. You’ll have to accept you own and everyone else’s imperfections [but not capitulation/defeatism], to ever have a chance to achieve long-term content of mind.

  • Sidney Powell is emerging as a pivotal figure among those sounding the alarm that the United States is forfeiting its claim to be anything like a democratic country subject to the rule of law. Like Rudolf Giuliani, Powell has been a federal prosecutor. Unlike Giuliani, Powell has made one thing abundantly clear. She will not...
  • @GeeBee
    @Tony Hall


    we need to make some space available to consider what communism is, where it came from, and how it has been applied, exploited and fought up to the present
     
    This is a key point. Hatred of communism stems from our roots in the soi-disant 'free world', where we have been repeatedly - and largely correctly - told that communism runs counter to our most cherished beliefs, as the inheritors of the great social, political and not least economic movements that began with 'The Enlightenment', and which came to fruition in a new world, formed by several cataclysmic 'revolutions'. These began in England in the mid-seventeenth century, and proceeded through 1789 in France and thence to the great 'year of revolutions' of 1848 throughout much of Europe. The events of 1917 in Russia, however, are normally thought of as being somehow distinct from these earlier movements, when in fact they are of a piece with them, but displaying a different character.

    By this, I mean that although all of these revolutions have undoubtedly shaped the modern world, and although they were ostensibly in the name of “the people,” they can be discerned as attempts to empower the merchant on the ruins of throne and altar. As Oswald Spengler noted:

    The economic tendency became uppermost in the stealthy form of revolution typical of the century, which is called democracy and demonstrates itself periodically, in revolts by ballot or barricaded on the part of the masses. In England, the Free Trade doctrine of the Manchester School was applied by the trades unions to the form of goods called ‘labour,’ and eventually received theoretical formulation in the Communist Manifesto of Marx and Engels. And so was completed the dethronement of politics by economics, of the State by the counting-house.

    These events form part of the ‘historical dialectic’ that Marx saw as steps in the march towards international communism. Marx’s philosophy, in effect, sought to hijack these unstoppable forces that were replacing the traditional world with Modernism. The process of ‘proletarianising’ much of society was already far advanced once Marx settled down to write Das Kapital in the mid-nineteenth-century. The same socio-political phenomenon that had contributed to the English Civil War would become more pronounced from the late 18th-century, in the wake of the Industrial Revolution.

    The rump of the traditional ruling class and the increasingly urbanised peasants and artisans sought, through politics, a kind of practical solidarity with one another, united as they were in their hatred of capitalism and ‘bourgeois revolution’ (much to Marx’s outrage). In England, from the late 1830s, the movement known as Chartism argued for the vote to be extended to all men over the age of twenty-one. One of its empirically odd developments was that an alliance formed between the landed aristocracy and the working class against the increasing power of the merchants and new industrialists in the middle class - a cohort that threatened both of the social classes that underpinned the tragically moribund world of Traditionalism, which is to say the agricultural workers and the landed aristocracy. The latter's 'privilege' meant that they were bound by noblesse oblige - the prevailing, paternalistic code of duty and honour - to feed and protect their workers. Benjamin Disraeli eloquently summed up this aristocratic paternalism in a speech in the House of Commons in 1842:

    When [in 1066] the Conqueror carved out parts of the land, and introduced the feudal system, he said to the recipient, “You shall have that estate, but you shall do something for it: you shall feed the poor; you shall endow the Church; you shall defend the land in case of war; and you shall execute justice and maintain truth to the poor for nothing.”
    “It is all very well to talk of the barbarities of the feudal system, and to tell us that in those days when it flourished a great variety of gross and grotesque circumstances and great miseries occurred but these were not the result of the feudal system; they were the result of the barbarism of the age. They existed not from the feudal system, but in spite of the feudal system. The principle of the feudal system, the principle which was practically operated upon, was the noblest principle, the grandest, the most magnificent and benevolent that was ever conceived by sage, or ever practised by patriot
    .”

    To Marx, these ‘reactionary’ developments interfered with the dialectical historical process, or the “wheel of history” as he saw it. He made no secret of the fact that his political philosophy actually required capitalism, as a necessary precursor to revolution. Its promotion of a homogenised mass culture and of open border internationalism, together with its insidious erosion of hitherto entrenched societal norms, would sweep away Traditionalism, which Marx correctly saw as a barrier to communist hegemony. Only untrammelled capitalism could prepare the ground for internationalist communism, which would be the ineluctable result of the ‘class struggle’, which in turn would lead to ‘the permanent revolution’, which would itself usher in the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’.

    Or would it? How very convenient all these ideas of Marx are, when re-examined from a dawning understanding that he served (and might well have been the handsomely paid servant of) the Globalists. Was it not, after all, meant to be the other way around? Which is to say the way it is today. It certainly appears the more likely case, in light of ‘events’, but in fact, such a question is now rendered otiose, and is merely akin to asking which side of the Modernist coin is currently uppermost. And does it actually matter, after all? Globalist or Marxist; Conservative or Labour; Republican or Democrat: in the end, under Modernism, it’s always the same people waxing fatter and fatter, and a one-way ratchet winding up the shackles placed on freedom of speech, thought, expression and action.

    In this regard it is essential to understand something that is so simple that it is almost always overlooked. In ancient societies, and until these latter-day revolutions that have shaped our world, ultimate power resided in ‘the palace’. It was thus a very dangerous development if a new mercantile class emerged, with more financial resources available to it than those available to the king. When this occurred, three things happened. First, the possessors of this superior wealth no longer respected the king’s word. They had, in stark terms, more money, and therefore more power, than he. Second, this allowed them to dictate policy to the palace. The king was no longer in any position to stand in the way of the merchants or their demands. And third, this meant that the entire raison d’etre of the old harmony of good governance, whereby the palace’s first duty was the wellbeing and protection of its subjects, collapsed, and the inevitable corollary of this was that traditional governance flew out of the window, and the king’s subjects found themselves at the mercy of a ruthless and venal cohort which had no investment in the welfare of the people, and therefore could, and did, act in ways that were designed solely to enrich themselves, usually at the expense of ordinary folk. It would be idle to point out that today, the full and bitter fruits of this social and economic calamity are all around us.

    It follows that Marx was not seeking to destroy capitalism, but rather to encourage the ‘proletariat’ to help themselves to its riches, by stealing it from the ‘bourgeoisie’. The new Marxist world would still be part of the great advance of Modernism: it embraced materialism and the primacy of money, and, in fact, ‘consumerism’. The American ‘Spenglerian’ Francis Parker Yockey (1917-1960) described this very succinctly:

    The ethical and social foundations of Marxism are capitalistic. It is the old Malthusian “struggle” again. Whereas to Hegel, the State was an Idea, an organism with harmony in its parts, to Malthus and Marx there was no State, but only a mass of self-interested individuals, groups, and classes. Capitalistically, all is economics. Self-interest means economics. Marx differed on this plane in no way from the non-class war theoreticians of capitalism – Mill, Ricardo, Paley, Spencer, Smith. To them all, Life was economies, not Culture… All believe in Free Trade and want no “State interference” in economic matters. None of them regard society or State as an organism. Capitalistic thinkers found no ethical fault with destruction of groups and individuals by other groups and individuals, so long as the criminal law was not infringed. This was looked upon as, in a higher way, serving the good of all. Marxism is also capitalistic in this.

    The notion of the State as ‘an organism with harmony in its parts’ was actually Spengler’s, but it was really a re-statement, after almost 300 years, of the core idea of Hobbes’ Leviathan of 1651, which postulated that the ideal society was just such a one previously described as embodying Traditionalism. Contemporary “conservatives” are no more in tune with this idea than are Marxists, for whom it is of course anathema: there can be no ‘class struggle’ or ‘permanent revolution’, much less a ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ where harmony prevails. As Yockey observed, "Socialism can be sniffed in the air prior to any and all ‘struggles’ between the component parts of this Spenglerian harmony within the organism of the State." In this way, the “class struggle” is revealed as a metaphorical cancer, whereby the cells of the organism fight among themselves until it dies.

    The 'communism' that we are taught to despise is thus little other than the obverse of the same coin whose 'capitalism' we are instructed to cherish. The good news is that there is a 'third way'. The bad news is that it is no longer allowed even to be mentioned, ever since it was brutally done away with in 1945, and buried beneath a moraine of propaganda, under which it will continue to lie until - as Rosencrantz remarked to Hamlet - 'the world's grown honest' (to which remark Hamlet's immediate riposte was, of course: 'Then is doomsday near').

    This 'third way' espoused Industrial Capitalism rather than the hegemonic 'Finance Capitalism' of today's West, the system that is underpinned by the equally hegemonic political system of Neo-Liberalism'. Wherever Industrial Capitalism has sought to prevail, it has been ruthlessly extirpated by the beneficiaries of Finance Capitalism (which is to say, by the international race and their hangers-on), posing as it does an existential threat to the Globalist scam.

    I wish you well in your attempt to change the world, and I hope that my little monograph might be of some help. (Note: I copied and pasted about half of this comment from one of my own works, published online more than two years ago, on a site since 'de-platformed' by the usual suspects).

    Replies: @Majority of One, @John Fisher, @obwandiyag

    My god, what a pile of horse manure.

    Class war is good. You, on the other hand, are sophomoric. The epitome of the truism, “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.”

    • Troll: GeneralRipper, Mikael_
    • Replies: @GeeBee
    @obwandiyag

    Pope's aphorism was actually 'a little learning is a dangerous thing' (from his Essay on Criticism. I like to get these things right...

    Replies: @obwandiyag

    , @Skeptikal
    @obwandiyag

    A little knowledge is a lot better than no knowledge . . .

  • @Majority of One
    @Mikael_

    Deliberately or otherwise, you are conflating my conceptualization of meta-politics. "...to win by any means necessary" is totally alien to this gradually developing political perspective. It is, rather, a dimensional approach, divorced from the Roman imperialist concept of Anno Domini---utterly a mechanism of not only physical control, but also of mind-control.

    The pattern was developed by the Emperor Constantine and his stooges, headed by Eusebius. Their aim was to establish a new foundation for the Empire, in fact a "grundlage" based on their utter perversion of the various Christianities which had been gradually developing over a time-frame of more than 200 years. The scheme was centered on co-option and amalgamation via an imperially inspired "Word of God", a Bible which was heavily interpolated and ruthlessly calculated to become the mythical foundation for a reconstructed imperium.

    My conceptualization of meta-politics commences with a Real-I-Zation of how mythologies underly all forms of mass political and economic cultural expressions. With his 'Communist Manifesto', Karl Marx attempted in his particular meta-political fashion, to formulate a new foundation, a new mythology based on a materialistic and atheistic rejection of traditionalism, which itself had been coopted from indigenous European spiritual understandings, by an alleged catholicism of Roman Imperialism.

    Imposed religions are nothing more than a bended and warped imposition upon the spiritual awakening vis a vis Talmudic Judaism by the figure we know as Jesus. His was, much in the Essene and Gnostic traditions, a profoundly spiritual rejection of the corruptive religion of Talmudism, which was rooted in the Babylonian captivity and owed as much to Babylonian concepts as to the more exclusivist promulgations of the ancient Hebrews. Religion, whether Roman-"Christian" or Talmudic Judaism,is nothing more than ossified and even petrified spirituality.

    Henry David Thoreau pointed out that there is no sense in hacking away at the branches of a problem. One must rather grub out the roots of that problem. Employing meta-political approaches, one always seeks out and deals with the roots. In the case of what THEY call "Judeo-Christian Civilization" (my term is the Judie-Christy Magick Mindfuck), the roots are embedded in Imperial Rome and its penultimate Imperial "decider" via his mythological slogan: "In hoc signe vincis"... In This Sign, Conquer...that sign being the Cross. Contrarily the original Jesusites employed the FISH as their signatory implement. Astrologically, the fish is the sign of Pisces. Jesus was the archetypal manifestation of the commencement of the Age of Pisces.

    Christianity was coopted by Constantine. The Emperor struck back and incorporated the reformulated "faith" as the foundational bulwark of the empire. It has lasted to this day and remains headquartered in Rome...now under the direct dominion of the Jesuits, with their crypto-Talmudist origins.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    First of all, I still haven’t seen you explain how you define “politics”, based on which previous’ thinkers thoughts, and more important how that is in line with today’s wide understanding of “politics”, or at the very least why the common understanding is wrong including your concise argumentation. (Not Alice in Wonderland style ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’)

    Beyond that, you make some good points in

    Imposed religions are nothing more than a bended and warped imposition upon the spiritual awakening vis a vis Talmudic Judaism by the figure we know as Jesus. His was, much in the Essene and Gnostic traditions, a profoundly spiritual rejection of the corruptive religion of Talmudism, which was rooted in the Babylonian captivity and owed as much to Babylonian concepts as to the more exclusivist promulgations of the ancient Hebrews. Religion, whether Roman-“Christian” or Talmudic Judaism,is nothing more than ossified and even petrified spirituality.

    but I feel you are also missing out on / misunderstanding a lot.

    As I see it, Jesus and the thinkers behind the New Testament (forget about the writers for a moment, even if they were one and the same) defined an improved “hierarchy of highest values” as a set of meta-rules, or actually meta-physics, commonly called a religion (1). They built on Talmudism, but surpassed it (actually sublated it), especially in one key idea:
    ‘[Large-scale] Perfection is not possible in this [earthly] world’,
    which includes
    – Striving for perfection in groups or systems will always lead to bad outcomes (nowadays one would state it as “Perfection as a policy goal always leads to totalitarianism.”)
    – When accepting that proposition, there is no need to declare all attempts to work towards the good to be futile (i.e. become Gnostic)
    – Because even though we cannot reach perfection ever, we can still always improve things/systems a little bit, all the time, even -or especially- after inevitable setbacks.

    Now every church, and to a lesser degree even the Bible, are “institutionalized” versions of the underlying religion, and are as you called them ‘ossified.’
    However you fell for a call to perfectism if you now want to dispense with them entirely, as
    a) the knowledge/wisdom has to be passed on, and not every person has the time (or ability) to go through decades of careful thought to come to the same conclusions on their own, and
    b) nothing hinders the true deep thinker to -truthfully and consistently- “go meta” beyond church and Bible.

    BTW I like to call it the ‘Greco-Judeo-Christian’ civilization with a smirk in my eyes.
    As a sign of both humility and humor.

    Note 1:
    We may have different definitions, but I see ‘spirituality’ as different from my above definition of religion in that spirituality is more fluid, meaning it can become a grab bag of thoughts (“I like this from Buddism, that from Taoism, and that from Christianity.”) That doesn’t necessarily imply that any chosen spirituality is in itself clearly self-contradictory, but at least that spirituality puts less emphasis on having an as-singular-and-simple-as-possible foundation. I prefer religion over spirituality.

    • Replies: @Majority of One
    @Mikael_

    So apparently we have arrived at an "agree to disagree" positioning as per spirituality vs religion. My perspective, as you appear to have recognized, is universalistic rather than particular. True,spiritual centered perspectives are more fluid--that's an agreed upon given.

    I would heartily disagree that these broad-scaled, even cosmic articulations are a "grab-bag of thoughts". For that we must deviate from the Newtonian, Cartesian, Marxist imposition which permeates official academic intellectualism and access a zone which those types abhor, a nexus where intuition, faith in this being a perhaps holographic projection of Creator, ever expansive and eternally questing and creating.

    The core human project as I perceive it is to become co-creators as individualized extensions of the ONE whom the Lakota people dare only to describe as "Wakan Tanka", the Great Mystery. I groove with that. To me, manmade religious formulations are ultimately hubristic and evermore tend towards control of the individual by a priestcraftly elite. That elitism also extends to the atheists and the irreligious, who have dominated Western thought since the "Enlightenment".

    One of my most profoundly postulated disagreements with BOTH religionists and rationalistic materialists centers my faith in our being individualized extensions of Creator's own being. As Jesus pointed out, we must look WITHIN to connect with "the Father"---an essence he never appears to conflate with the hateful, bloodthirsty Hebrew tribal WarGod "YHWH" or Yahweh. This understanding is critical to understanding of the difference between those Jesusites who endeavored to follow what the Lakota called "The Red Road" or better understood to us as the spirit path, with those who are Trinitarian Christian believers.

    We are spirits, living a three-dimensional material lifetime. As extensions of Creator, we too are of eternal spirit.

    My biggest beef with the totally impositional Roman Christianity is the fact that Eusebius and the gang were evidently ordered by Constantine to remove all references to reincarnation from the "Holy Book" they edited, redacted, extrapolated and interpolated. This removal of an essential element of the spirit path was deemed essential to imposition of the mythos of Jesus dying on the cross to "save us from our sins" and that failure to BELIEVE this particular trope would land us in eternal Hellfire and Damnation. To that line I will ever say "BullShit". It's all about control over the people by that priestcraftly elite on behalf of the imperial agenda.

    According to ancient traditions to be found within the phantasmagoria of Hinduism, we currently reside in Kali Yuga, the Iron Age---an era in which the scum, rather than the cream of humanity rises to the top. I do believe, Mikael, that we can concur that this is not an inapt description of our current cultural condition.

    Materialistic rationalists have denounced Astrology as being "unscientific" or even anti-science. Yet, the 26,000 year cycle of the Precession of the Equinoxes tells me that the figure of Jesus (sign of the fish embraced by the original Jesusites) was the archetype for the Age of Pisces.


    It remains not inconceivable that we happen to be in the final stages of the Kali Yuga and may, should the Awakening continue to prosper, transition into a whole nother dimensional reality, a renaissance of the general human spirit where Real-I-Zations will actualize those brief multidimensional excursions some of us have taken through the use of entheogens.

    Nuclear Metaphysics: One is All and All is One. The Whole is equal to AND greater than the sum of its parts.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @Emslander

  • @obvious
    @Mikael_

    It does require a backbone though, and common sense... which you people lack spectacularly.

    Trumptardism is inherently immoral, and a deliberate waste of your energy.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    “He refuted my previous post in a way I cannot counter!

    Quick, move the goalposts!!”

  • Never heard of an Alpha course. (Just researched it a little.)

    Well you did accept without question the false dichotomy

    “Either acceptance of the risen Christ as your sole route to salvation is the most important thing in your life, or we (the course instructors) are a bunch of fools”

    I wouldn’t.

    Secondly, you need to check your premises about

    No amount of ‘striving’ will unseat the ruling oligarchy and their loyal cohorts. This is their final triumph and our enduring tragedy

    regarding today, before 1945, and many other times in last few centuries.
    The wrong underlying assumption is
         ‘[large-scale] perfection is possible in this [earthly] world’,
    therefore it is a valid goal and reasonable target.
    It’s not. It’s actually the central reason for most enormous man-made disasters, especially in the 20th century. But it takes a lot of humility to realize and then accept it.

  • @redmudhooch
    Mmmmmmm...Yummmmm. Gimme sum. Thats what I call a conspiracy theory. Ima have to change my britches after this one.

    One of Chavez’s mentors was Fidel Castro. While the Cuban Revolution was founded in guerrilla warfare and a military takeover of power, the governments of Chavez and then of Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela have depended, and continue to depend, on the outcomes of elections. Were these elections done honestly or were the Venezuelan elections as corrupt and dishonest as the current US election?

    Sidney Powell tends to equate her antagonism with Venezuela’s communist system with her antagonism towards the Dominion and Smartmatic vote rigging systems. Both companies retain ties with their Venezuelan founders and both companies, in the view of Sidney Powell at least, are tainted by their origins in a socialist system of governance.

    Powell presents a case that the US election of 2020 included purposeful interventions from communist regimes also in Cuba, and China. Powell’s undeveloped argument about the alleged interference in the US election of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is especially fraught given a core element of Trump’s political platform. One of Trump’s main political goals has been to restore US manufacturing capacity, a capacity that was largely exported to China along with millions of decent jobs.
     
    I'm framing this and hanging it next to my pictures of Jesus, Hugo Chavez, Ahmadinejad, Lacey Chabert, 2Pac and Josef Stalin.

    Stop smokin' da kracken crackaz. Goodnight, Thanks Unz

    Replies: @Brás Cubas

    I really fail to see any implausibility here. Based on the supply-and-demand principle, the questions one has to ask are: Is there a demand for riggable voting machines in shitty countries? Will they sell it to other countries which happen to have a demand for similar reasons?

    Does ideology play a part here? Well, on the buyer’s side, perhaps, but who cares?. On the seller’s side, the only ideology one has to assume is profit.

    • Agree: Mikael_
  • @GeeBee
    @Majority of One

    Many thanks for your glowing encomium kind sir! Despite the odd - and inevitable - dissenting opinion, I am very gratified to find that I might have shone some light onto a very murky path. One such opinion berates me for having left out religion! I rather thought that I had written quite enough, without embarking on an excursus into that particular minefield. Suffice it to say that of course, Traditionalism is predicated upon the spiritual dimensions of human existence. whereas Modernism is exclusively, at its core, concerned with shallow materialism, both of which points you accurately stated in your reply.

    Furthermore, it is useful to note that Marx’s belief that Communism is the “end of history” is shared by capitalism. The Traditionalist, however, views history not as a straight line from “primitive to modern,” but as one of continual ebb and flow, or as a wheel turning on a stable axis. Marx’s “wheel of history”, in marked contradistinction, rumbles inexorably on, crushing all tradition, heritage and national culture before it, until it finally comes to rest forever at an immovable concrete wall.

    As Anthony Ludovici pointed out, in England at least, and therefore as a wider heritage of the English-speaking nations, the growing political division between the old order and Modernism, between Traditionalism and mercantilism, was as much as anything predicated on conflict of interest between the old rural world and the ever-puissant urban. With Modernism’s seemingly final victory, Right and Left, Free Trade and Protectionism, capitalism and communism, have become no more than different manifestations of the money-power and therefore of materialism.

    As for the USA's dismal record in promoting our current dystopian world (not least by 'ganging up' on any manifestation of the 'Third Way' that has emerged) I would point out that today, with China espousing something very close to the Financial International's worst nightmare - which is to say the excellent and equitable alternative system of Industrial Capitalism, and with it a jettisoning of the hegemonic petro-dollar - the moribund Anglo-Zionist Empire reminds one of Lady Macbeth's analogy: "Letting 'I dare not' wait upon 'I would', like the poor cat i' the adage". America would dearly love to extirpate this intolerable nuisance of yet another burgeoning example of its nemesis, but at heart it knows that this time, it would be taking on someone at least its own size - something that, as we all know, any bully is careful to avoid.

    Once again, many thanks for your kind words.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    I was the guy who “berated you for having left out religion.”

    So sorry, I still cannot make head or tails overall out of your laid-out thoughts.
    Care to expand on?

    While you are pretty clear about what one should run away from (communism, straight-line history interpretations including ‘the end of history’ delusions, shallow materialism)
    you are rather nebulous about what to strive towards.
    Traditionalism and spiritual dimensions of human existence are too ambiguous terms to me, because the goal of a stable society is to find ‘commonly agreed-upon ultimate [exact] values’ and to successfully hand them down to future generations.

    And what exactly about religion is a minefield you dare not touch? [And seemingly by implication, needn’t touch?]

    • Replies: @GeeBee
    @Mikael_


    So sorry, I still cannot make head or tails overall out of your laid-out thoughts.
    Care to expand on?
     
    I think that I have done quite enough expanding, and if you cannot make sense of what I have written, that is your loss not mine.

    you are pretty clear about what one should run away from
     
    I don't believe I mentioned 'running away' from anything. I was attempting to describe the circumstances in which we find ourselves.

    you are rather nebulous about what to strive towards.
     
    No amount of 'striving' will unseat the ruling oligarchy and their loyal cohorts. This is their final triumph and our enduring tragedy. We dwell in what I regard as a sort of 'Twilight of the Gods', Götterdämmerung having occurred on 8th May 1945. There is no discernable way back. Wotan certainly never expected to be given a second chance and for us to do so is the most naïve of conceits.

    And what exactly about religion is a minefield you dare not touch?
     
    I know more about the subject of religion than the vast majority of people, having 'survived' the notorious 'Alpha course' back in the late 1980s. Having completed the course, I immediately understood that in order to surmount the central challenge of that course I must be certain of my ground. That challenge was stated at the course thus: "Either acceptance of the risen Christ as your sole route to salvation is the most important thing in your life or we (the course instructors) are a bunch of fools".

    I am totally comfortable in my belief that they are, in fact, a group of, not fools perhaps, but genuinely misguided dupes. I came to this conclusion by means of an arduous journey of intense religious study, regarding which I could a tale unfold whose lightest word would harrow up thy soul, freeze thy young blood, make thy knotted and combin'ed locks to part and each particular hair to stand on end like quills upon the fretful porpentine.

    It's by no means the case that I 'dare not touch' this subject, but rather that it is completely unnecessary so to do. Like Dan Dennett, I am content to 'believe in belief'. Societies need religion. Christianity is perhaps an unfortunate choice for European-derived societies to have made, but at this stage it will have to serve office accordingly.

    I thank you for your interest in my comments.

  • @niceland
    Is Sidney Powell non-partisan?

    Quote from the article:

    “My intent,” Powell assets, “has always been to expose all the fraud I could find and let the chips fall where they may—whether it be upon Republicans or Democrats.”

     

    Really?
    Read the opening paragraph of this article.

    I want the American public to know right now, we will not be intimidated. American patriots are fed up with the corruption from the local level to the highest level of our government. We are going to take this country back. We will not be intimidated. We are going to clean this mess up right now. President Trump won by a landslide. We are going to prove it. And we are going to reclaim the United States of America for the people who voted for freedom. — Sidney Powell, Washington D.C., 19 November, 2020
     
    Yeah, Tump won, and voting for him equals voting for freedom. These inconsistencies do not instill credibility. Neither does her overblown confidence before she has accomplished anything. Release the Kraken!? We are in the comic books now?

    It gets worse with accusations of foreign influence from... Venezuela of all places. With the communists pulling the strings for Biden!?

    Are we supposed to take this seriously? Like the Russian influence of the last election perhaps?

    If this was my Lawyer I would consider my self in deep trouble. What happened to: speak softly and carry a big stick? Sorry in my books there is something off with this lady.

    I can't comment on election fraud. But keep in mind incompetence is given in the process and can perhaps explain some of the anomalies. Or: "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity".

    Replies: @bjondo, @Tony Hall, @obvious

    Who is that coming from such a gentle, temperate and nice land? This all sounds quite like a critique I heard recently from someone very close to Unz Review. Its fair comment that there is some contradiction between claiming a willingness to go after Democrats or Republicans and wanting to prove that Trump that won. But humans tend to be like that. We aren’t always totally consistent. Some of us make allowances for that. Go figure.

    This is not just your usual election fraud and the Biden crew in all their diversity of constituencies and incarnations are not like any other aspirants to the power of the White House that I’ve ever seen.

    Sidney Powell isn’t by any means perfect but under the circumstances she has taken this fiasco all on with gusto and measure of intelligence with a pretty compelling stage presence. She has popped up as a significant player on the grand stage of Americana and much of what she is standing for and embodying is deserving of notice and analysis. To me she seems to have what it takes to get beyond some of the constraints limiting what Giuliani can achieve.

    Your final paragraph is just so familiar as it goes over some of the same ground that my Unz Review friend and I traversed not that long ago. Whither the deplorables, the Dems and the Chinese Communist Party? Wither the workers of the world? When it comes to what I know of this election fraud from a few days of hard digging, it seems to me to display malice albeit with a good deal of stupidity as well.

    • Agree: Emslander, Mikael_
  • @GeneralRipper
    @Corvinus

    Death to your kind.

    Death to the Left and their children.

    Replies: @gay troll

    Lol and you call yourself a Christian. Lucifer wants me to remind you that Jesus said to never resist your enemies, but to love your enemies, in fact to love everyone on Earth as if they were your neighbor. If you want to kill your enemies and their children then you can just follow the Old Testament instead of pretending to care about the New. Maybe you’ll even get your new temple some day. Shalom.

    • Troll: Mikael_
    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
    @gay troll

    Christian men and some women are the greatest warriors the world has ever known, faggot.


    "Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.

     

    You are a sick filthy pervert. Deserving of slow painful death.

    Replies: @gay troll

    , @Miville
    @gay troll

    Only personal private enemies within the confines of the nation or of the faith. Jesus never put into question the necessity to fight the enemies of Israel, the public enemies, and even to warn against any humanistic impulse to treat them as equal, which injunction was to pass from the nation of Israel to the church of Rome as soon as the schism between Judaism and Christianity was consummated. Early Christianity started right away with a permanent call to persecute Jews and heretics and to use the Roman state's secular arm even when they were themselves persecuted.

  • @obvious
    @Robert Snefjella

    It is ironic that a billionaire heir stealing the presidency should be perceived by such a large assemblage of lower average morons as the existential manifestation of their fantasy world. For the first time in American history, a nation of 70 year old magatard children thought they had "won" a board game in their mind.

    FTFY

    Replies: @Majority of One, @Mikael_

    I always laugh out over clowns like you,
    to whom the lessons from Forest Gump went straight over their heads:

    “It doesn’t require high IQ to identify immoral actions.”

    • Replies: @obvious
    @Mikael_

    It does require a backbone though, and common sense... which you people lack spectacularly.

    Trumptardism is inherently immoral, and a deliberate waste of your energy.

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • @Tony Hall
    @Robert Snefjella

    Thanks Robert Snefjella. As I worked on the essay in recent days I felt one of the most significant and underreported topics in what I discovered was how the COVID-19 media-induced hysteria has been so essential in setting up the United States for wholesale rigging of this presidential election. The same media screaming the loudest about supposed "spikes" in "cases" (based on a PCR testing procedure that is totally ineffective) are the same venues saying, don't you dare look into the claims of the crazy people who are claiming election fraud has taken place on a massive scale.

    I find important the line of analysis being pursued by Phill Kline who calls attention to the fact that Zuckerberg forked over $400,000,000 million to enforce and exploit all the COVID relaxations and eliminations of old rules designed by wise people to protect election integrity. Who is Zuckerberg really and who does he work for? Who actually created Facebook and for what ends? Who and what does Facebook serve now? Why are Facebook and Google not subject to anti-trust interventions in order to restore the principle that the Internet is a public resource not subject to private ownership and control.

    Anyway, the nefarious way the COVID-19 con is being worked by the usual suspects who control the "news" should be subject to major skepticism and scrutiny right now.. Like so many other areas of this massive scandal, the political applications of the COVID scam to election rigging should already be subject to investigation by the "criminal justice system." I appreciate seeing the attention you have brought to this subject with your comment Robert Snefjella.

    In my view, all news reporters using the hackneyed, non-sensical "conspiracy theory" meme as a short form command that one should not pay attention-- that one should look the other way-- call attention to the possibility that journalists in question are possibly knowing participants or inadvertent dupes in genuine conspiracies.

    Replies: @Rurik, @Robert Snefjella

    Thanks Tony, and I agree with your remarks and here are a few of my own inspired by this question of yours:

    Why are Facebook and Google not subject to anti-trust interventions in order to restore the principle that the Internet is a public resource not subject to private ownership and control.

    When I was young, words such as ‘the common good’,’ the public interest’, ‘public servants’, public utilities’, ‘the country’s armed forces’, public lands, and so on were much used and broadly understood, and perhaps unwisely were assumed as permanent sensible aspects of a democratic polity.

    The word ‘monopoly’ was best represented by a board game of that name, but much of the public had somehow learned the lesson that a monopoly whatever else it was – was in part always a danger.
    The words monopoly and totalitarian are kindred. In the same vein, conglomerations of corporations under unified ownership were understood as not in the best long run interests of the broad public or of the country.

    The idea of ‘privatizing’ public utilities was pretty well absent from political discourse.

    But how things changed. I won’t go through a long list, except to note that it is my understanding that some of the American generals far afield have in recent years employed private guards, and while I’m not sure of this as fact, I have read that Trump has employed some of his own private security alongside the Secret Service, with the latter’s reputation especially stained by participation in JFK’s public execution.

    So the intrusion of Zuckerberg’s vast private fortune into the quintessential public ritual, the election process and count for public office, can be seen as yet another part in a vast increase in recent decades of the intrusion of private elite money, private elite influence , private elite power, private elite censorship, private elite dishonesty, private elite advantage, private elite profit, into the commons, the public realm. And at great cost to the public interest, and even, at the moment it seems to me, at our great peril.

    It is ironic that a billionaire business man winning the presidency should be perceived by such a large assemblage of ‘top dogs’ as an existential threat to their ‘monopoly’.

    The ‘meaning’ of Trump – and here I am not pretending to know his actual personal motives or intentions – is that he has thrown a dizzying array of proverbial ‘monkey wrenches’ into the System of Power that he was inserted into. While telling many lies, exaggerating much, and probably misunderstanding much, he has also been the greatest truth telling political leader of our time. He has thrown the bs prescribed international political narrative into a tizzy.

    His main contribution to truth and the possibility of societal reconstruction has been his continual honest and derisive depiction of mass media – liars and fake news. But there have been so many other verbal volleys wreaking havoc on polite scripted sensibilities.

    So, for example, he nailed Canada’s Prime Minister Trudeau with the apt description “very dishonest and weak”. Unheard of diplomatic behaviour, but oh so true. Trump aptly termed the annual war games off North Korea “provocative’, to howls of outrage. He refused to go along with the climate change psyop, to howls of outrage. He said mean things about European countries re NATO. He described US wars abroad, wars he very well knows are for Israel and profit and Empire, as – ill considered – harmful, wasteful, destructive, foolish, to howls of outrage.

    Trump mused quite correctly that hydroxychloroquine could be very helpful re the new bio-weapon, and drew howls of outrage. Adam Shiff, prolific political purveyor of the disingenuous, becomes “Shifty Schiff.” And so on.

    A few years ago I wrote a piece ‘JFK and Solzhenitsyn’. In it I noted that the Soviet Politburo was faced with a greatly discomfiting dilemma over whether to allow the publication of “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich”, the S’ novella about one person’s day/life in the gulag. The problem was that carefully maintained USSR false ‘narratives’ were inconsistent with the Denisovich tale. If a novella can make tyrants quake, how solid is the ground they have built their house on?

    Trump has til recently been hated so much by the powerful because he doesn’t play by the elite prescribed bs narratives. And for all his faults, in part because he alone was willing to blurt out unscripted truths, and unscripted tweets, the public by the tens of millions warmed to him. So as with Denisovich, if one Trump can make the powerful, the billionaires, so uncomfortable, how solid is the ground they are standing on?

    • Thanks: Majority of One
    • Replies: @Tony Hall
    @Robert Snefjella

    Thanks Robert. That's thoughtful commentary on the creep of private monopolies over almost every element of our society, including, we can now clearly see, even the process of voting.

    Imagine the power of Bill Gates with his hundreds of billions derived initially from his lawyers' efforts to exploit IBM's need not to extend its highlighted monopoly into home computers. With his purchase of the likes of Neil Ferguson and Imperial College and hundreds of other scam artists playing the role of "scientists," Gates and company was able to make his vaccine promotions through COVID scare-mongering the monopoly narrative of media companies and the governments that media companies can easily make or break. The monopoly of Gates and co. was made to extend even to his more or less purchasing the World Health Organization. Its chilling to contemplate the purchase of a major component of the United Nations to promote a business scheme of the world's main promoter of mandatory cradle to grave vaccines, depopulation, and AI to advance the integration of humans into the robotization of nearly everything. That's a big part, I believe, of how the media was made to become the purveyors of the COVID con that continues day to day to provide the pretext for deterioration of the human condition. This handing over of the ship of state to multibillionaires like Soros or Zuckerberg or, or, or has to stop.

    The first priority has to be to seize back the instruments of communication from the monopolists busily engaged in taking control of the Internet.

    Replies: @Biff, @Robert Snefjella, @anarchyst

    , @obvious
    @Robert Snefjella

    It is ironic that a billionaire heir stealing the presidency should be perceived by such a large assemblage of lower average morons as the existential manifestation of their fantasy world. For the first time in American history, a nation of 70 year old magatard children thought they had "won" a board game in their mind.

    FTFY

    Replies: @Majority of One, @Mikael_

  • @Tony Hall
    Thanks Notsofast.

    Powell's obsession with what she sees as the Venezuelan commie roots of the election fraud I agree is somewhat over the top. I understand her preoccupation with communism as pretty typical of many of us who grew up in the Cold War, but especially of those who see themselves as Christian conservatives. I tried to touch on these matter in the final section. Two decades after the end of the Cold War with the demise of the Soviet Union, deeply felt anti-communism is once again becoming a powerful theme of political discourse as some of the polemics in all this election controversy attests. How are we to view the Chinese Communist Party now and in the future? Clearly the Trumpists and Dems start from very different places in how to think about and address this matter. Given this disagreement we need to make some space available to consider what communism is, where it came from, and how it has been applied, exploited and fought up to the present. Some of that discussion necessarily requires some consideration to the relationship of Jewish and Israeli history to communist history, a theme I intend to take on in the future

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @GeeBee, @MLK, @R2b, @R2b, @R.C., @R2b

    we need to make some space available to consider what communism is, where it came from, and how it has been applied, exploited and fought up to the present

    This is a key point. Hatred of communism stems from our roots in the soi-disant ‘free world’, where we have been repeatedly – and largely correctly – told that communism runs counter to our most cherished beliefs, as the inheritors of the great social, political and not least economic movements that began with ‘The Enlightenment’, and which came to fruition in a new world, formed by several cataclysmic ‘revolutions’. These began in England in the mid-seventeenth century, and proceeded through 1789 in France and thence to the great ‘year of revolutions’ of 1848 throughout much of Europe. The events of 1917 in Russia, however, are normally thought of as being somehow distinct from these earlier movements, when in fact they are of a piece with them, but displaying a different character.

    [MORE]

    By this, I mean that although all of these revolutions have undoubtedly shaped the modern world, and although they were ostensibly in the name of “the people,” they can be discerned as attempts to empower the merchant on the ruins of throne and altar. As Oswald Spengler noted:

    The economic tendency became uppermost in the stealthy form of revolution typical of the century, which is called democracy and demonstrates itself periodically, in revolts by ballot or barricaded on the part of the masses. In England, the Free Trade doctrine of the Manchester School was applied by the trades unions to the form of goods called ‘labour,’ and eventually received theoretical formulation in the Communist Manifesto of Marx and Engels. And so was completed the dethronement of politics by economics, of the State by the counting-house.

    These events form part of the ‘historical dialectic’ that Marx saw as steps in the march towards international communism. Marx’s philosophy, in effect, sought to hijack these unstoppable forces that were replacing the traditional world with Modernism. The process of ‘proletarianising’ much of society was already far advanced once Marx settled down to write Das Kapital in the mid-nineteenth-century. The same socio-political phenomenon that had contributed to the English Civil War would become more pronounced from the late 18th-century, in the wake of the Industrial Revolution.

    The rump of the traditional ruling class and the increasingly urbanised peasants and artisans sought, through politics, a kind of practical solidarity with one another, united as they were in their hatred of capitalism and ‘bourgeois revolution’ (much to Marx’s outrage). In England, from the late 1830s, the movement known as Chartism argued for the vote to be extended to all men over the age of twenty-one. One of its empirically odd developments was that an alliance formed between the landed aristocracy and the working class against the increasing power of the merchants and new industrialists in the middle class – a cohort that threatened both of the social classes that underpinned the tragically moribund world of Traditionalism, which is to say the agricultural workers and the landed aristocracy. The latter’s ‘privilege’ meant that they were bound by noblesse oblige – the prevailing, paternalistic code of duty and honour – to feed and protect their workers. Benjamin Disraeli eloquently summed up this aristocratic paternalism in a speech in the House of Commons in 1842:

    When [in 1066] the Conqueror carved out parts of the land, and introduced the feudal system, he said to the recipient, “You shall have that estate, but you shall do something for it: you shall feed the poor; you shall endow the Church; you shall defend the land in case of war; and you shall execute justice and maintain truth to the poor for nothing.”
    “It is all very well to talk of the barbarities of the feudal system, and to tell us that in those days when it flourished a great variety of gross and grotesque circumstances and great miseries occurred but these were not the result of the feudal system; they were the result of the barbarism of the age. They existed not from the feudal system, but in spite of the feudal system. The principle of the feudal system, the principle which was practically operated upon, was the noblest principle, the grandest, the most magnificent and benevolent that was ever conceived by sage, or ever practised by patriot
    .”

    To Marx, these ‘reactionary’ developments interfered with the dialectical historical process, or the “wheel of history” as he saw it. He made no secret of the fact that his political philosophy actually required capitalism, as a necessary precursor to revolution. Its promotion of a homogenised mass culture and of open border internationalism, together with its insidious erosion of hitherto entrenched societal norms, would sweep away Traditionalism, which Marx correctly saw as a barrier to communist hegemony. Only untrammelled capitalism could prepare the ground for internationalist communism, which would be the ineluctable result of the ‘class struggle’, which in turn would lead to ‘the permanent revolution’, which would itself usher in the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’.

    Or would it? How very convenient all these ideas of Marx are, when re-examined from a dawning understanding that he served (and might well have been the handsomely paid servant of) the Globalists. Was it not, after all, meant to be the other way around? Which is to say the way it is today. It certainly appears the more likely case, in light of ‘events’, but in fact, such a question is now rendered otiose, and is merely akin to asking which side of the Modernist coin is currently uppermost. And does it actually matter, after all? Globalist or Marxist; Conservative or Labour; Republican or Democrat: in the end, under Modernism, it’s always the same people waxing fatter and fatter, and a one-way ratchet winding up the shackles placed on freedom of speech, thought, expression and action.

    In this regard it is essential to understand something that is so simple that it is almost always overlooked. In ancient societies, and until these latter-day revolutions that have shaped our world, ultimate power resided in ‘the palace’. It was thus a very dangerous development if a new mercantile class emerged, with more financial resources available to it than those available to the king. When this occurred, three things happened. First, the possessors of this superior wealth no longer respected the king’s word. They had, in stark terms, more money, and therefore more power, than he. Second, this allowed them to dictate policy to the palace. The king was no longer in any position to stand in the way of the merchants or their demands. And third, this meant that the entire raison d’etre of the old harmony of good governance, whereby the palace’s first duty was the wellbeing and protection of its subjects, collapsed, and the inevitable corollary of this was that traditional governance flew out of the window, and the king’s subjects found themselves at the mercy of a ruthless and venal cohort which had no investment in the welfare of the people, and therefore could, and did, act in ways that were designed solely to enrich themselves, usually at the expense of ordinary folk. It would be idle to point out that today, the full and bitter fruits of this social and economic calamity are all around us.

    It follows that Marx was not seeking to destroy capitalism, but rather to encourage the ‘proletariat’ to help themselves to its riches, by stealing it from the ‘bourgeoisie’. The new Marxist world would still be part of the great advance of Modernism: it embraced materialism and the primacy of money, and, in fact, ‘consumerism’. The American ‘Spenglerian’ Francis Parker Yockey (1917-1960) described this very succinctly:

    The ethical and social foundations of Marxism are capitalistic. It is the old Malthusian “struggle” again. Whereas to Hegel, the State was an Idea, an organism with harmony in its parts, to Malthus and Marx there was no State, but only a mass of self-interested individuals, groups, and classes. Capitalistically, all is economics. Self-interest means economics. Marx differed on this plane in no way from the non-class war theoreticians of capitalism – Mill, Ricardo, Paley, Spencer, Smith. To them all, Life was economies, not Culture… All believe in Free Trade and want no “State interference” in economic matters. None of them regard society or State as an organism. Capitalistic thinkers found no ethical fault with destruction of groups and individuals by other groups and individuals, so long as the criminal law was not infringed. This was looked upon as, in a higher way, serving the good of all. Marxism is also capitalistic in this.

    The notion of the State as ‘an organism with harmony in its parts’ was actually Spengler’s, but it was really a re-statement, after almost 300 years, of the core idea of Hobbes’ Leviathan of 1651, which postulated that the ideal society was just such a one previously described as embodying Traditionalism. Contemporary “conservatives” are no more in tune with this idea than are Marxists, for whom it is of course anathema: there can be no ‘class struggle’ or ‘permanent revolution’, much less a ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ where harmony prevails. As Yockey observed, “Socialism can be sniffed in the air prior to any and all ‘struggles’ between the component parts of this Spenglerian harmony within the organism of the State.” In this way, the “class struggle” is revealed as a metaphorical cancer, whereby the cells of the organism fight among themselves until it dies.

    The ‘communism’ that we are taught to despise is thus little other than the obverse of the same coin whose ‘capitalism’ we are instructed to cherish. The good news is that there is a ‘third way’. The bad news is that it is no longer allowed even to be mentioned, ever since it was brutally done away with in 1945, and buried beneath a moraine of propaganda, under which it will continue to lie until – as Rosencrantz remarked to Hamlet – ‘the world’s grown honest’ (to which remark Hamlet’s immediate riposte was, of course: ‘Then is doomsday near’).

    This ‘third way’ espoused Industrial Capitalism rather than the hegemonic ‘Finance Capitalism’ of today’s West, the system that is underpinned by the equally hegemonic political system of Neo-Liberalism’. Wherever Industrial Capitalism has sought to prevail, it has been ruthlessly extirpated by the beneficiaries of Finance Capitalism (which is to say, by the international race and their hangers-on), posing as it does an existential threat to the Globalist scam.

    I wish you well in your attempt to change the world, and I hope that my little monograph might be of some help. (Note: I copied and pasted about half of this comment from one of my own works, published online more than two years ago, on a site since ‘de-platformed’ by the usual suspects).

    • Disagree: Mikael_
    • Replies: @Majority of One
    @GeeBee

    Of all the postings on Unz Review I have read over the years, this monograph by Gee Bee stands out in both quality of exposition and readable clarity. My thanks and kudos to this erudite individual who has distilled the qualities of the primary struggle of this age of dissolution and despair.

    He rightly points the finger at the underlying agency for cultural devolution---rationalistic materialism and all its works and all its ways--a total denial of the spiritual (not necessarily religious, per se) basis for an organic, holistic and harmonic society which axiomatically would feature a form of hierarchy based on a combination of merit and virtue as against greed and self-interest.

    Gee Bee correctly points that communism and capitalism are anything but polar opposites, rather a pair of peas in the same corruptive pod. Writ simply, this battle is the ancient one between the aggrandizing evil of the Archons of destruction versus the qualities of honesty, truth, honor, beauty and love which represent the Tao of traditional East Asian culture and the Red Road spirt-path of Native Americans and all traditionalistic cultures.

    As a theoretical conceptualizer of meta-political awareness, my first Gold Star for long-developed realization of the causes and effects of this war for the minds and hearts of humankind, goes to GeeBee for his contribution to our understanding of the "grundlage" or foundation of this deliberately occulted and occluded battle.

    MOST HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: A must-read and read again. Absorb GeeBee's words and thoughts. My thanks for rarely heard words of understanding and wisdom.

    -Majority of One

    Replies: @Wally, @Mikael_, @GeeBee

    , @John Fisher
    @GeeBee

    Excellent...thank you! I'm sure I would have appreciated your de-platformed site

    Only one quibble:


    These began in England in the mid-seventeenth century
     
    I would say the revolution began in England more than a century earlier. As EMJ likes to say, the Reformation in England was simply a massive looting operation.
    , @obwandiyag
    @GeeBee

    My god, what a pile of horse manure.

    Class war is good. You, on the other hand, are sophomoric. The epitome of the truism, "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing."

    Replies: @GeeBee, @Skeptikal

  • @Majority of One
    @Wally

    Wally. Please make your own arguments. Links are okay by me if they actually do more than buttress a shallow-perspective argument. You need to hit the books, man. Your perceptions apparently have yet to catch up to your heart, which does appear to be in the right place. From ages of 17-22 I was a gong-ho Goldwater conservative and favored the U$ military and sicced them on those nasty commie rats. At 76, now, I've had a chance to round the block a few times. Thus, my political perceptivity has emerged from stage two (macro-politics) through mega-politics (third stage) and now have developed a meta-political point of view.

    My take on GeeBee is that he is in an elevated level of meta-political understanding, with a sound and thoroughly researched schooling for his foundation. Both communism and capitalism spring from a spiritually void dimension of rationalistic materialism. Come to understand those principles and your level of conceptualizing something of what Bismarck called "Realpolitik" will slide effortlessly into place. But first, you need to hit those books. Re-read GeeBee and search through his references. They make a great launching pad for depth of political perspective.

    Replies: @GeneralRipper, @Mikael_, @Wally

    now have developed a meta-political point of view

    Well that’s telling, even more than ignoring my comment #133.
    Not philosophical or meta-physical, but meta-political.
    Politics, where there are no ultimate values, only to win by by any means necessary.

    Enjoy your self-made hell
    .
    (Which is what I believe was also trying to convey.)

    • Replies: @Majority of One
    @Mikael_

    Deliberately or otherwise, you are conflating my conceptualization of meta-politics. "...to win by any means necessary" is totally alien to this gradually developing political perspective. It is, rather, a dimensional approach, divorced from the Roman imperialist concept of Anno Domini---utterly a mechanism of not only physical control, but also of mind-control.

    The pattern was developed by the Emperor Constantine and his stooges, headed by Eusebius. Their aim was to establish a new foundation for the Empire, in fact a "grundlage" based on their utter perversion of the various Christianities which had been gradually developing over a time-frame of more than 200 years. The scheme was centered on co-option and amalgamation via an imperially inspired "Word of God", a Bible which was heavily interpolated and ruthlessly calculated to become the mythical foundation for a reconstructed imperium.

    My conceptualization of meta-politics commences with a Real-I-Zation of how mythologies underly all forms of mass political and economic cultural expressions. With his 'Communist Manifesto', Karl Marx attempted in his particular meta-political fashion, to formulate a new foundation, a new mythology based on a materialistic and atheistic rejection of traditionalism, which itself had been coopted from indigenous European spiritual understandings, by an alleged catholicism of Roman Imperialism.

    Imposed religions are nothing more than a bended and warped imposition upon the spiritual awakening vis a vis Talmudic Judaism by the figure we know as Jesus. His was, much in the Essene and Gnostic traditions, a profoundly spiritual rejection of the corruptive religion of Talmudism, which was rooted in the Babylonian captivity and owed as much to Babylonian concepts as to the more exclusivist promulgations of the ancient Hebrews. Religion, whether Roman-"Christian" or Talmudic Judaism,is nothing more than ossified and even petrified spirituality.

    Henry David Thoreau pointed out that there is no sense in hacking away at the branches of a problem. One must rather grub out the roots of that problem. Employing meta-political approaches, one always seeks out and deals with the roots. In the case of what THEY call "Judeo-Christian Civilization" (my term is the Judie-Christy Magick Mindfuck), the roots are embedded in Imperial Rome and its penultimate Imperial "decider" via his mythological slogan: "In hoc signe vincis"... In This Sign, Conquer...that sign being the Cross. Contrarily the original Jesusites employed the FISH as their signatory implement. Astrologically, the fish is the sign of Pisces. Jesus was the archetypal manifestation of the commencement of the Age of Pisces.

    Christianity was coopted by Constantine. The Emperor struck back and incorporated the reformulated "faith" as the foundational bulwark of the empire. It has lasted to this day and remains headquartered in Rome...now under the direct dominion of the Jesuits, with their crypto-Talmudist origins.

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • @TKK
    @Mikael_

    If you are looking for salvation and hope from the American legal system- I feel for you, Brother.

    To be sure- I am just being intellectually honest.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    Hmm, the smell of overly righteous attitude in the evening… even wrapped in “intellectual honesty.”

  • @Majority of One
    @GeeBee

    Of all the postings on Unz Review I have read over the years, this monograph by Gee Bee stands out in both quality of exposition and readable clarity. My thanks and kudos to this erudite individual who has distilled the qualities of the primary struggle of this age of dissolution and despair.

    He rightly points the finger at the underlying agency for cultural devolution---rationalistic materialism and all its works and all its ways--a total denial of the spiritual (not necessarily religious, per se) basis for an organic, holistic and harmonic society which axiomatically would feature a form of hierarchy based on a combination of merit and virtue as against greed and self-interest.

    Gee Bee correctly points that communism and capitalism are anything but polar opposites, rather a pair of peas in the same corruptive pod. Writ simply, this battle is the ancient one between the aggrandizing evil of the Archons of destruction versus the qualities of honesty, truth, honor, beauty and love which represent the Tao of traditional East Asian culture and the Red Road spirt-path of Native Americans and all traditionalistic cultures.

    As a theoretical conceptualizer of meta-political awareness, my first Gold Star for long-developed realization of the causes and effects of this war for the minds and hearts of humankind, goes to GeeBee for his contribution to our understanding of the "grundlage" or foundation of this deliberately occulted and occluded battle.

    MOST HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: A must-read and read again. Absorb GeeBee's words and thoughts. My thanks for rarely heard words of understanding and wisdom.

    -Majority of One

    Replies: @Wally, @Mikael_, @GeeBee

    Actually I strongly disagree with GeeBee.
    It is difficult to make a concise counter argument to the flood of information bits he wrote.

    As I understand it, Marx took Feuerbach and added some messianic part towards a “classless society” to it. While Marx was likely driven somewhat by envy, I believe his main goal was to undermine and destroy [Christian] religion.
    Which brings me to the most obvious deficit in GeeBee’s comment: the absence of religion, or for atheistic-inclined people “commonly agreed-upon highest values” in his analysis, and even more important how those values get handed down to the next generation. That last point also being the worst overlooked aspect by Kant.

    All that and much much more can be found in “The Crisis of Modernity” by Augusto Del Noce.

  • @Robert Snefjella
    First, thanks to Tony Hall for this article, which touches on important aspects of the underlying reasons for the election situation - and the state of the United States.

    The brazen and obviously highly planned and coordinated attempt to steal this election has engaged, and focused the attention of, and spurred outrage and concern among, tens of millions of Americans.

    The 'election hearings' in various States that I've managed to look in on have featured poignant election fraud exposés, with many concerned citizens with backbone presenting many devastating revelations.

    Here once again much mass media is complicit in either not giving fair and adequate coverage, or in ignoring, censoring or purveying disinformation about the proceedings. This too is being noticed by millions.

    But a widespread public 'awakening' is a necessary prelude, within a milieu in which political corruption and dysfunction have gained the upper hand, to the renovations necessary to achieving a preponderance of political - in the broadest sense of that term - virtue.

    So the brazen nature of the attempted usurpation of political power through fraud, crime, pernicious manipulation, and lies, among other evils, can be seen as a great gift to the 'salt of earth' public by corrupt power .

    Had the attempted steal been more subtle, more nuanced, its chances of smoother success would have increased.

    Another aspect of the current situation is the degree to which good people in positions of authority have joined with the 'deplorables' in being shaken and woken up. The "swamp" - aka the cesspool - has had a sufficient spotlight shone upon it to reveal it as wider, and deeper, and more heavily populated, and more foul, than many, including good people in official positions, had previously appreciated.


    From the article:

    They ["most news agencies"] assume that they can help along an historic instance of election tampering without being held legally accountable for the crimes in which they are deeply complicit.
     
    Things are getting really interesting as awareness grows that this was not just yet another instance of typical marginal and inevitable election shenanigans, but a well organized, deeply planned, and widely supported, attempted coup. And the attempted coup is attempting to place into the Presidency an irredeemably corrupt and demented man. And furthermore, that President Trump in actuality had received an unprecedented outpouring of citizen support in the form of legitimate votes across the United States.

    The active or passive support for the attempted coup by the CIA, the FBI, the DOJ and large swathes of the federal and state political elite in the United States is now starkly revealed.

    The question of military loyalty, and the loyalty of police forces and national guards, becomes a critical question.

    As Tony Hall has also pointed out, the situation in the United States takes place within the context of a global - in effect - coup d'etat attempt, whereby a non-existent or marginal pandemic is declared a terribly dangerous all enveloping pandemic, and normal human and civil rights in many countries are suspended.

    It is illustrative of the wide reach of the planning for the 'great reset' - whatever madness and banality and horror are the eventual components - that here in a small community in rural Canada the iron curtain of propaganda in support of the scamdemic and against Trump, and the curtailment of counter-information, has been obvious.

    Replies: @Tony Hall

    Thanks Robert Snefjella. As I worked on the essay in recent days I felt one of the most significant and underreported topics in what I discovered was how the COVID-19 media-induced hysteria has been so essential in setting up the United States for wholesale rigging of this presidential election. The same media screaming the loudest about supposed “spikes” in “cases” (based on a PCR testing procedure that is totally ineffective) are the same venues saying, don’t you dare look into the claims of the crazy people who are claiming election fraud has taken place on a massive scale.

    I find important the line of analysis being pursued by Phill Kline who calls attention to the fact that Zuckerberg forked over $400,000,000 million to enforce and exploit all the COVID relaxations and eliminations of old rules designed by wise people to protect election integrity. Who is Zuckerberg really and who does he work for? Who actually created Facebook and for what ends? Who and what does Facebook serve now? Why are Facebook and Google not subject to anti-trust interventions in order to restore the principle that the Internet is a public resource not subject to private ownership and control.

    Anyway, the nefarious way the COVID-19 con is being worked by the usual suspects who control the “news” should be subject to major skepticism and scrutiny right now.. Like so many other areas of this massive scandal, the political applications of the COVID scam to election rigging should already be subject to investigation by the “criminal justice system.” I appreciate seeing the attention you have brought to this subject with your comment Robert Snefjella.

    In my view, all news reporters using the hackneyed, non-sensical “conspiracy theory” meme as a short form command that one should not pay attention– that one should look the other way– call attention to the possibility that journalists in question are possibly knowing participants or inadvertent dupes in genuine conspiracies.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    @Tony Hall


    Why are Facebook and Google not subject to anti-trust interventions in order to restore the principle that the Internet is a public resource not subject to private ownership and control.
     
    https://www.rt.com/usa/508402-trump-veto-ndaa-section-230/
    , @Robert Snefjella
    @Tony Hall

    Thanks Tony, and I agree with your remarks and here are a few of my own inspired by this question of yours:


    Why are Facebook and Google not subject to anti-trust interventions in order to restore the principle that the Internet is a public resource not subject to private ownership and control.
     
    When I was young, words such as 'the common good',' the public interest', 'public servants', public utilities', 'the country's armed forces', public lands, and so on were much used and broadly understood, and perhaps unwisely were assumed as permanent sensible aspects of a democratic polity.

    The word 'monopoly' was best represented by a board game of that name, but much of the public had somehow learned the lesson that a monopoly whatever else it was - was in part always a danger.
    The words monopoly and totalitarian are kindred. In the same vein, conglomerations of corporations under unified ownership were understood as not in the best long run interests of the broad public or of the country.

    The idea of 'privatizing' public utilities was pretty well absent from political discourse.

    But how things changed. I won't go through a long list, except to note that it is my understanding that some of the American generals far afield have in recent years employed private guards, and while I'm not sure of this as fact, I have read that Trump has employed some of his own private security alongside the Secret Service, with the latter's reputation especially stained by participation in JFK's public execution.

    So the intrusion of Zuckerberg's vast private fortune into the quintessential public ritual, the election process and count for public office, can be seen as yet another part in a vast increase in recent decades of the intrusion of private elite money, private elite influence , private elite power, private elite censorship, private elite dishonesty, private elite advantage, private elite profit, into the commons, the public realm. And at great cost to the public interest, and even, at the moment it seems to me, at our great peril.

    It is ironic that a billionaire business man winning the presidency should be perceived by such a large assemblage of 'top dogs' as an existential threat to their 'monopoly'.

    The 'meaning' of Trump - and here I am not pretending to know his actual personal motives or intentions - is that he has thrown a dizzying array of proverbial 'monkey wrenches' into the System of Power that he was inserted into. While telling many lies, exaggerating much, and probably misunderstanding much, he has also been the greatest truth telling political leader of our time. He has thrown the bs prescribed international political narrative into a tizzy.

    His main contribution to truth and the possibility of societal reconstruction has been his continual honest and derisive depiction of mass media - liars and fake news. But there have been so many other verbal volleys wreaking havoc on polite scripted sensibilities.

    So, for example, he nailed Canada's Prime Minister Trudeau with the apt description "very dishonest and weak". Unheard of diplomatic behaviour, but oh so true. Trump aptly termed the annual war games off North Korea "provocative', to howls of outrage. He refused to go along with the climate change psyop, to howls of outrage. He said mean things about European countries re NATO. He described US wars abroad, wars he very well knows are for Israel and profit and Empire, as - ill considered - harmful, wasteful, destructive, foolish, to howls of outrage.

    Trump mused quite correctly that hydroxychloroquine could be very helpful re the new bio-weapon, and drew howls of outrage. Adam Shiff, prolific political purveyor of the disingenuous, becomes "Shifty Schiff." And so on.

    A few years ago I wrote a piece 'JFK and Solzhenitsyn'. In it I noted that the Soviet Politburo was faced with a greatly discomfiting dilemma over whether to allow the publication of "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich", the S' novella about one person's day/life in the gulag. The problem was that carefully maintained USSR false 'narratives' were inconsistent with the Denisovich tale. If a novella can make tyrants quake, how solid is the ground they have built their house on?

    Trump has til recently been hated so much by the powerful because he doesn't play by the elite prescribed bs narratives. And for all his faults, in part because he alone was willing to blurt out unscripted truths, and unscripted tweets, the public by the tens of millions warmed to him. So as with Denisovich, if one Trump can make the powerful, the billionaires, so uncomfortable, how solid is the ground they are standing on?

    Replies: @Tony Hall, @obvious

  • The political economy of the Digital Age remains virtually terra incognita. In Techno-Feudalism, published three months ago in France (no English translation yet), Cedric Durand, an economist at the Sorbonne, provides a crucial, global public service as he sifts through the new Matrix that controls all our lives. Durand places the Digital Age in the...
  • Likely the most confused article I have ever read from Pepe Escobar.

    Chinese shehui xinyong (and by extension Mao) good, Silicon Valley digital fiefdoms bad.
    That’s your deep-level analysis?

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
    @Mikael_

    I see what you're saying about this article but it has to be admitted that Pepe including the Silicon Valley technocrats as being a large part of the deep state, is self evident. They are literally the catalyst that speeds up the deep states power, in my opinion.

    , @showmethereal
    @Mikael_

    Translation - the tech world would like to make everyone slaves -while complaining about others.

    , @Mary Marianne
    @Mikael_

    The difference is that, in China, Beijing controls their equivalent of Silicon Valley (i.e. Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance, etc.). In the USA, however, Silicon Valley controls Washington.

  • Sidney Powell is emerging as a pivotal figure among those sounding the alarm that the United States is forfeiting its claim to be anything like a democratic country subject to the rule of law. Like Rudolf Giuliani, Powell has been a federal prosecutor. Unlike Giuliani, Powell has made one thing abundantly clear. She will not...
  • Unz puts all of the corruption of the current US ruling class in one long compilation, so that he won’t have to risk angering his pals at Facebook beyond today. It’s the classic corporate strategy of piling all the bad news that they can find from years forward and years backward into a quarterly earnings report. It’s standard accounting practice that Unz knows very well as a tool of Wall Street.

    Now you anti-Semites can begin your mindless attribution of all the corruption to Israel or Zionists or Barbara Streisand, guilty of some things, no doubt, but there’s plenty to go around. A true accounting would certainly include my girl-men fellow Catholics, the corrupt Protestant World and lots of atheists. Probably not many Muslims, however.

    • Troll: Mikael_
    • Replies: @annamaria
    @Emslander

    Your supremacist hatred makes your slander unconvincing: Facebook bans The Unz Review https://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/05/facebook-bans-unz-review.html

    We also got your idea that any reporting must be 'measured,' that is, filled with the proper dosage of 'good' news and 'bad' news. Are your Jewish parents from the former USSR?

    "mindless attribution of all the corruption to Israel" -- And what exactly are the virtues of this thieving and sadistic entity proud of being founded by the self-proclaimed terrorists? What has been preventing the rabid zionists in the US/EU/UK from a joyous relocation to the promised land of the state of Israel? I guess, the Jewish State suffers some deep ethical and cultural problems that make the State undesirable for those who want to enjoy the fruit of western civilization.

    It is the stunning stupidity of the Jewish Community at large, which alone can explain the continuous Jewish support for the Wars for Eretz Israel, including the attacks on the freedom of information and freedom of speech in the western world. Add to that the insane demands for unrestricted emigration -- to the western world only; to preserve the questionable 'purity of Jewish blood,' the racist state of Israel deports brown and black people at once.

    The supremacist Jewish lunatics need to make a choice about which country to give their loyalty to. If the choice is Israel, the zionists should better relocate to the Jewish State and start implementing their revolutionary ideas there, for their own Jewish expense and away from western civilization.

    Replies: @Emslander

  • @Afterthought
    Echoes of late republican Rome.

    America is dead While it helps us that Trump fights, and would be even more helpful if he wins, that is only the beginning.

    We cannot live with these people any longer.

    The split in the GOP over this fight foreshadows the split over whether we move towards a declaration of a new sovereign homeland, or continue the slide towards Marxist hell under the guise of false "centrism".

    In the end there will be a split as one side embodies the eternal principles of cosmic Law and Order (logos and arta), while the Enemy incarnates the antithetical forces of Chaos and Falsehood (druj).

    Replies: @The Alarmist, @mutantbeast, @Sin City Milla

    I think Sidney Powell should have a statue on Mt Rushmore if she pulls this off. RINOS are equally as bad as the commie paert, formerly known as the Democrats. JFK and Truman would be disgusted by todays D party. Hubert Humphrey would be disgusted by them.

    • Agree: Mikael_
  • First, thanks to Tony Hall for this article, which touches on important aspects of the underlying reasons for the election situation – and the state of the United States.

    The brazen and obviously highly planned and coordinated attempt to steal this election has engaged, and focused the attention of, and spurred outrage and concern among, tens of millions of Americans.

    The ‘election hearings’ in various States that I’ve managed to look in on have featured poignant election fraud exposés, with many concerned citizens with backbone presenting many devastating revelations.

    Here once again much mass media is complicit in either not giving fair and adequate coverage, or in ignoring, censoring or purveying disinformation about the proceedings. This too is being noticed by millions.

    But a widespread public ‘awakening’ is a necessary prelude, within a milieu in which political corruption and dysfunction have gained the upper hand, to the renovations necessary to achieving a preponderance of political – in the broadest sense of that term – virtue.

    So the brazen nature of the attempted usurpation of political power through fraud, crime, pernicious manipulation, and lies, among other evils, can be seen as a great gift to the ‘salt of earth’ public by corrupt power .

    Had the attempted steal been more subtle, more nuanced, its chances of smoother success would have increased.

    Another aspect of the current situation is the degree to which good people in positions of authority have joined with the ‘deplorables’ in being shaken and woken up. The “swamp” – aka the cesspool – has had a sufficient spotlight shone upon it to reveal it as wider, and deeper, and more heavily populated, and more foul, than many, including good people in official positions, had previously appreciated.

    From the article:

    They [“most news agencies”] assume that they can help along an historic instance of election tampering without being held legally accountable for the crimes in which they are deeply complicit.

    Things are getting really interesting as awareness grows that this was not just yet another instance of typical marginal and inevitable election shenanigans, but a well organized, deeply planned, and widely supported, attempted coup. And the attempted coup is attempting to place into the Presidency an irredeemably corrupt and demented man. And furthermore, that President Trump in actuality had received an unprecedented outpouring of citizen support in the form of legitimate votes across the United States.

    The active or passive support for the attempted coup by the CIA, the FBI, the DOJ and large swathes of the federal and state political elite in the United States is now starkly revealed.

    The question of military loyalty, and the loyalty of police forces and national guards, becomes a critical question.

    As Tony Hall has also pointed out, the situation in the United States takes place within the context of a global – in effect – coup d’etat attempt, whereby a non-existent or marginal pandemic is declared a terribly dangerous all enveloping pandemic, and normal human and civil rights in many countries are suspended.

    It is illustrative of the wide reach of the planning for the ‘great reset’ – whatever madness and banality and horror are the eventual components – that here in a small community in rural Canada the iron curtain of propaganda in support of the scamdemic and against Trump, and the curtailment of counter-information, has been obvious.

    • Agree: Mikael_, Alfred
    • Thanks: Majority of One
    • Replies: @Tony Hall
    @Robert Snefjella

    Thanks Robert Snefjella. As I worked on the essay in recent days I felt one of the most significant and underreported topics in what I discovered was how the COVID-19 media-induced hysteria has been so essential in setting up the United States for wholesale rigging of this presidential election. The same media screaming the loudest about supposed "spikes" in "cases" (based on a PCR testing procedure that is totally ineffective) are the same venues saying, don't you dare look into the claims of the crazy people who are claiming election fraud has taken place on a massive scale.

    I find important the line of analysis being pursued by Phill Kline who calls attention to the fact that Zuckerberg forked over $400,000,000 million to enforce and exploit all the COVID relaxations and eliminations of old rules designed by wise people to protect election integrity. Who is Zuckerberg really and who does he work for? Who actually created Facebook and for what ends? Who and what does Facebook serve now? Why are Facebook and Google not subject to anti-trust interventions in order to restore the principle that the Internet is a public resource not subject to private ownership and control.

    Anyway, the nefarious way the COVID-19 con is being worked by the usual suspects who control the "news" should be subject to major skepticism and scrutiny right now.. Like so many other areas of this massive scandal, the political applications of the COVID scam to election rigging should already be subject to investigation by the "criminal justice system." I appreciate seeing the attention you have brought to this subject with your comment Robert Snefjella.

    In my view, all news reporters using the hackneyed, non-sensical "conspiracy theory" meme as a short form command that one should not pay attention-- that one should look the other way-- call attention to the possibility that journalists in question are possibly knowing participants or inadvertent dupes in genuine conspiracies.

    Replies: @Rurik, @Robert Snefjella

  • @TKK
    @Mikael_

    That's exactly what I am saying.

    I am a small fish in a big pond lawyer, but I deal with Judges most days of my life.

    Save one who is now dead, I have never seen a judge who is not a self serving, cunning, two faced political critter.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    Okayyy.
    Extrapolation sans limite.
    And you come to UNZ to read doom porn and share your nihilism / spread the misery around
    …or why exactly?

    • Replies: @TKK
    @Mikael_

    If you are looking for salvation and hope from the American legal system- I feel for you, Brother.

    To be sure- I am just being intellectually honest.

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • @TKK
    Nothing will come from Powell's lawsuits.

    Do not fall for this false hope.

    Harris/Biden will be President. There is no Judge or State Legislature who will go against the entire Establishment/Big Tech/Wall Street.

    Obama blessed over $2 TRILLION dollars of our money bailing out Wall Street without one indictment. Think about that.

    How is that relevant? Obama is all over the media lately, and it's not just to hawk his narcissistic, rambling 2nd autobiography.

    Obama is back on the scene to make sure Trump is steam rolled and Wall Street is pleased. When Obama talks, the media drops to their knees. ((They)) pulled out the biggest gun they have to insure the Election Result sticks.

    Look at Biden's cabinet picks. All Deep State/Swamp things: John Kerry? Yellin?

    These articles about the election fraud (which happened more likely than not) are just theoretical exercises. Band aids for a gut wound with a machete. No deus ex machina is coming to save the day.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @Johnny Smoggins, @Sick of Orcs, @Anonymous, @gay troll

    What you’re actually trying to say is “There will be not a single principled judge who will follow his conscience.
    Hilarious!

    (If there will be enough principled judges is not clear. It’s clearly an uphill battle for Trump and supporting lawyers. Which however is no reason at all to concede the fight.)

    • Replies: @TKK
    @Mikael_

    That's exactly what I am saying.

    I am a small fish in a big pond lawyer, but I deal with Judges most days of my life.

    Save one who is now dead, I have never seen a judge who is not a self serving, cunning, two faced political critter.

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • Nothing will come from Powell’s lawsuits.

    Do not fall for this false hope.

    Harris/Biden will be President. There is no Judge or State Legislature who will go against the entire Establishment/Big Tech/Wall Street.

    Obama blessed over $2 TRILLION dollars of our money bailing out Wall Street without one indictment. Think about that.

    How is that relevant? Obama is all over the media lately, and it’s not just to hawk his narcissistic, rambling 2nd autobiography.

    Obama is back on the scene to make sure Trump is steam rolled and Wall Street is pleased. When Obama talks, the media drops to their knees. ((They)) pulled out the biggest gun they have to insure the Election Result sticks.

    Look at Biden’s cabinet picks. All Deep State/Swamp things: John Kerry? Yellin?

    These articles about the election fraud (which happened more likely than not) are just theoretical exercises. Band aids for a gut wound with a machete. No deus ex machina is coming to save the day.

    • Agree: Niebelheim, Fred777
    • Replies: @Mikael_
    @TKK

    What you're actually trying to say is "There will be not a single principled judge who will follow his conscience."
    Hilarious!

    (If there will be enough principled judges is not clear. It's clearly an uphill battle for Trump and supporting lawyers. Which however is no reason at all to concede the fight.)

    Replies: @TKK

    , @Johnny Smoggins
    @TKK


    No deus ex machina is coming to save the day.
     
    The deus ex machina that could save the day is Russian or Chinese missiles.

    Replies: @TKK

    , @Sick of Orcs
    @TKK


    Do not fall for this false hope.
     
    According to one poll something like 30% of Democraps believe the election was rigged. If there are any Donks left with half a functional brain, they already know they're dead in the water with #beijingbiden and #fakenggaharris.

    Trump-hatred is the only thing keeping the illusion of shitlib unity afloat, if they sacrifice that for a losing candidate backed by an even bigger loser they're done for.

    The Democrap/Deep Shit's lust for power is astonishing even to those of us who know better. A clear Trump victory now only means/meant, at best, 4 more years to prepare for war. Retardicucks are finished as of 2024 since Orange-Tweety Ego-Golfer-Kushner-Dupe did zip to stop the ongoing demographic terrorism.

    Had fkface biden won Florida I'd be more inclined to believe it was an honest win. The lack of Donks doing all they can to prove there was no fraud is proof enough they're full of shit. War it is.

    Replies: @obvious

    , @Anonymous
    @TKK

    reply to: https://www.unz.com/article/trumps-landslide-meets-the-politics-of-electoral-fraud-in-america/#comment-4320408

    A Biden Administration. "They said 'Cheer up', things could be worse.' So I cheered up, and things got worse: the Biden Administration.

    Look at the situation on the ground, the problem is more than deep "unfairnes" and the re-introduction of privilege (lit is privi-> private, lege->law) for the nobles, "Quod licet jovi, non licet bovi".

    The US civil and export sectors are grossly under-capitalized, the US labor force is de-skilled, the new immigrants are (mostly) low IQ, the armed forces urgently need recapitalization and re-skilling, the US deployment of forces is actually harmful to the US interest, China is a fierce competitor, the Europeans are worthless allies (in that their function is defending the Fulda Gap https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulda_Gap through which Russian armies are not going to come), the entire West and its allies (even Japan) has become noncompetitive as compared to China and even India, we have incipient inter-ethnic armed clashes if welfare is reduced, and it finally appears that the US Dollar might lose its international reserve currency status thanks to modern monetary theory (MMT).

    Moreover, the cities are in the early stages of open revolt, everybody and every company with mobile assets and/or employment or even with the ability to hitchhike is deserting the cities. Those without mobility are being taxed out of existence or simply shut down until they go bankrupt. The urban areas are shutting down mass transit, which is as necessary for their workforce food, because it gets the money to buy the food. Electricity supply is becoming erratic, and the money to make it reliable is not politically available. The countryside is being flooded with urban refugees, many penniless, many young, who have little options beyond soldier or brigand.

    It's almost a parody:

    The mighty tusks that fought in brawls
    of Mastodons - are billiard balls.
    The Sword of Charlemagne the Just
    is ferric oxide - known as rust.
    Great Caesar's bust is on the shelf,
    and I don't feel so well myself.

    And then, on top of that, last artistic touch, the outrageous and forthright theft of the 2020 Federal election delegitimizes Federal and some State governments in favor of an utter incompetent, a heavy-handed ideologue who believes in government by force to support cities, and a purblind and intensely stupid "Deep State" that believes only in itself. Trump might have pulled off an FDR and at least provided leadership that would have softened the transition, and still might if he manages to win, but I'm assuming a Biden Administration for this posted comment.

    A Biden Administration would have no choice but to strip remaining assets from the US hinterlands (Trump's America) by force to provide urban areas (Biden's base) with inadequate funds. After the first six months, the asset will be gone, the rest of the world will be busy fighting regional wars, and international trade will have declined sharply (as tourism already has). Intense poverty, US & worldwide, a Federal government that strips assets from its hinterlands until the cost of asset stripping exceeds the asset taken and it can't pay the asset stripping forces, the hinterland electrical grids become less reliable than California's are now. This would be followed by cutting the hinterland loose and an actual revolt of the cities as food gets shot and the local infrastructure fails. That's a possible outcome now, if Biden wins.

    Implications: After WW II Western Civilization built a world that assumed the entire world would become industrialized, and that industry was so productive and well understood that it could be subjected to political control, that "we can do anything we can think of, so deciding what to do is more important than anything else". Both assumptions failed, for Marxists and for all other forms of State control. Western governments, Western countries, and Western populations have been badly hurt in consequence, but still believe that political control might succeed. It cannot. Faith in political control as primary is a basic failure in Western Civilization, and will require decades (or maybe more) to correct. Biden's victory, if he has one, would mean a decisive failure in political control as primary. A history survey a Century from now might read: "The USSR and the US, two examples of absolute political control after WW I, failed within 40 years of each other, each having lasted about 7 decades after adopting absolute political control of its civil economy (USSR: 1919, US: 1945)." I would add: In both cases, after 7 decades neither had enough of a civil economy left to support the national population. Nothing left to steal.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @gay troll
    @TKK

    The only thing Trump did was triple down on Obama’s economic policies. The DJIA nearly doubled from November 2016 to November 2020. Wall Street was all over his administration. You think they’re displeased with him?

  • Sidney Powell makes me think of Orly Taitz. I wonder if the same outfit in Mossad is responsible for digging her up as a double edge sword whose ultimate objective is to compromise everybody who associates with her.

    • Troll: TheTrumanShow, Mikael_
    • Replies: @Alden
    @utu

    That’s a very good point. I always look at who’s really behind something even before I look for who benefits.

  • @Hartmut Pilch
    The inability to take principled positions against egalitarian (e.g. antiracist, feminist) bigotry has led a lot of cuckservatives to ascribe the culture changes that they dislike to a communist movement and to use the bad reputation of CCP, Castro, Chavez etc as a way of demonizing the enemy and therebey evading an honest debate. This kind of "anti-communism" on which Sidney Powell is riding is a cuckservative bad habid and it backfires. But it doesn't change the validity of Powell's cause.

    Replies: @Mikael_, @Wazup

    Your otherwise good argument suffers a little from your own inability to clearly explain what communism is, in your understanding, and why today’s CCP is still factually communist.

  • In one ruling, a bombshell. Issued in the late evening this past Friday by Pennsylvania Commonwealth judge, Patricia McCollough, her bold- and absolutely correct- ruling is about to make Nov 27, 2020 the day that the highly questionable 2020 election blew to pieces. To make matters worse for the Dems, the same day, just down...
  • • Thanks: Mikael_
    • Replies: @profnasty
    @Priss Factor

    That's not a word.

  • Sat night, PA Supreme Court over-ruled Judge McCullough’s decision. PA election certification may proceed. I’ll bet the PA GOP state legislators are peeved.

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/527838-pennsylvania-supreme-court-strikes-down-gop-bid-to-stop-election

    • LOL: Mikael_
    • Replies: @Anon7
    @The Real World

    Don't forget, in 2000, the Gore team WON all of their legal battles in state supreme courts as well as low-level federal courts. Bush only won ONE - but it was the one that counted, the only one that counted, before the Supreme Court.

    Replies: @Abbybwood

    , @George F. Held
    @The Real World

    YIKES! The system does not work. War is coming. . .

    , @Erebus
    @The Real World

    From The Hill...


    "Upon consideration of the parties’ filings in Commonwealth Court, we hereby dismiss the petition for review with prejudice based upon Petitioners’ failure to file their facial constitutional challenge in a timely manner," the order read.
     
    In other words, they didn't rule on the substantive issues but on a technicality.

    I realize that the relevant rules/laws were created or changed some time prior to the election, but are there statutes of limitations pertaining to unconstitutionally created laws? Surely they're not somehow elevated beyond constitutional reach once they've been there for a while.

    Seems like a highly political decision to me.

    At any rate, it's the state legislatures that have the final word and if Trump's supporters want their legislatures to respect the will of the people, they're gonna have to overcome the typical legislature's penchant for ignoring it. After they overcome their own lack of interest in their local legislatures themselves, of course.

    The perpetrators of this fraud were counting on at least one of those holding.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    , @A123
    @The Real World


    PA Supreme Court over-ruled Judge McCullough’s decision. PA election certification may proceed.
     
    The PA Supreme Court is well known for its bias against The Rule of Law. Their attempt to embrace fraud-by-mail was highly predictable.

    The next step is asking for a SCOTUS injunction. Justice Alito covers the region. He is also highly predictable. Given Alito's case history, he is near certain to suspend the PA Supreme Court's incorrect ruling.
    ____

    This is not the only path to fix the problem in PA. In yet another blow to Blue Coup: (1)

    “The Pennsylvania House of Representatives has the duty to ensure that no citizen of this Commonwealth is disenfranchised, to insist that all elections are conducted according to the law, and to satisfy the general public that every legal vote is counted accurately.”

    Pennsylvania State Sen. Doug Mastriano, a Republican, said Friday that the GOP-controlled state legislature will make a bid to reclaim its power to appoint the state’s electors to the Electoral College, saying they could start the process on Nov. 30.

    “So, we’re gonna do a resolution between the House and Senate, hopefully today,” he told Steve Bannon’s War Room on Friday. “I’ve spent two hours online trying to coordinate this with my colleagues. And there’s a lot of good people working this here. Saying, that the resolution saying we’re going to take our power back. We’re gonna seat the electors.
     
    The key swing states impacted by ballot fraud have Republican Legislatures. You can see the alignment for every state here (2).

    And, the U.S. Constitution gives those Legislatures exclusive authority for the selection of Presidential Electors. (3)

    Clause 2. Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress; but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office
     
    As this power is directly enumerated by The U.S. Constitution, there is no way for state executive or state judicial bodies to intervene.

    The SJW Globalist DNC's Blue Coup is headed to defeat.

    PEACE 😇
    _______

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/political/pennsylvania-republicans-introduce-resolution-disputing-election-results

    (2) https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2020:_State_legislative_chambers_that_changed_party_control

    (3) https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-2/03-electoral-college.html

    Replies: @The Shadow

  • Ever since the suspicious switch in the swing states from heavy Trump majorities to a media-declared Biden win; I have been following the flow of events very closely. Before adding my take on the article and its powerful purport, I must give kudos to Mr Redmayne-Titley and also my thanks for an amazing piece de resistance of legal research and reportorial acumen.

    Key to the essayist’s analysis is this sentence: “IT DOES SEEM EVIDENT, INDEED, THAT THIS WAS ALL BY DESIGN”. The plandemic was the foundation for fraud by mostly Democrat prostiticians, aided and abetted by the mass media, social media and secretive dirty-work by the Deep $tate departments, bureaus and agencies, most particularly the central control mechanism on behalf of the bankster agenda, the CIA.

    Riots all over Western Europe against the lockdowns, demonstrations by pissed-off Trump supporters and plain ordinary American citizens against an evidentially stolen election constituting a so-far mostly peaceful uprising; are signals by those who have caught on to the falsity of the Covid crisis. Though millions of the media-mesmerized masses, probably some 60 million of them, hypnotized and befuddled by control over the message by the plotters and schemers, did vote for the Harris-Biden ticket. At the same time well over 70 million voters cast their ballots for the sitting president.

    Without doubt, this situation as so well delineated by the essayist is the most profound Constitutional crisis since at least the era of America’s Civil War. Faked (s)elections are a tool of the elite against the public. Lincoln’s timeless description of republican governance during his Gettysburg Address was dutifully addressed by the Pennsylvania Republican Senate majority by holding their hearing at the scene of that hallowed ground: “…that government of the people, by the people and for the people should not perish from this earth”. Or to quote the great spokesman for the original American Revolution which ultimately created this republic, Thomas Paine: “…these are the times that try men’s souls”.

    Redmayne-Titley correctly pointed out that ultimately this matter will come before the Supreme Court of the United States. There will be fallout. The US District Court Judge from Georgia,.Obaminable’s appointee Eleanor Ross got her tits caught in a wringer by “overlooking” Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution. Perhaps the jurist should be sentenced to a Constitutional law remediation course by the greatest living constitutional scholar, Dr. John Whitehead. She may face more rigorous treatment, though, by being disbarred.

    Another candidate for tits in a wringer, as cited by the essayist, is Michigan’s secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, who, ex-cathedra, voided Michigan’s legal requirement for a voter’s signature to cast a mail-in ballot. Redmayne-Titley notes that by doing so, Benson effectually created a new law, a power only granted to the legislature of that state. We are getting quite warm now in proving out that her action, like that of the District judge in Georgia and the authors and primary supporters of Pennsylvania’s new enabling act for mail-in ballots, which in itself violated that state’s standing laws ,points clearly towards a massive designed conspiracy, hinging on the planned plandemic crisis.

    Testimonies by witnesses to Wisconsin’s Electoral Commission instructing election workers to add missing addresses to mail-in votes will also likely appear before courts of law…with the entire nation closely following the results. It does seem to be quite clear that in so doing, the commissioners violated Wisconsin Statute 6.86.

    Though the essayist cited it quite briefly, the whole matter of the number of states using the Dominion voting machine system, falls to the ultimate Trump-card. Dominion is run out of Spedina Street in Toronto, Ontario, CANADA. Systems for these machines were tabulating in centers located in Spain and in Frankfurt, Germany. In the latter site, the CIA itself appears to be complicit.

    Oh yes, that TRUMP-CARD: Back in 2018 the president issued an executive order regarding foreign interference in American elections. There are some teeth in that EO. Dominion, curiously, leads us back to where the bankster cabal is headquartered, City of London. The Dominion of Canada as well as those of Australia and New Zealand all are ruled ultimately by their Governors General, who is appointed by and answers to the Quean herself. Dominion, domain, domination, dome-in-nation, damnation. They all seem to chime together, do they not?

    President Trump also covered his flanks against the WarDefense industry top generals and admirals in the Pentagram by naming a new Secretary of Defense and his primary Deputy. He also directed that all US special forces units are directly under their command rather than to the chains of command by the brassnosed honchos in Arlington.

    We do live in interesting times. As Stickman pointed out some years back, “when machine count the votes, voters’ votes don’t count”. Those who have been closely following the election afterbirth are not likely to count out Donald J. Trump.

    • Replies: @Peripatetic Itch
    @Majority of One


    Dominion is run out of Spedina Street in Toronto, Ontario, CANADA.

     

    Spedina should be Spadina. Street should be Avenue, according to Canada's National Post. (there being a Spadina Road as well.)

    Sorry to harp on such picky details but it's significant enough to come up again. Otherwise great comment.

    Replies: @Majority of One

    , @pecosbill
    @Majority of One


    Lincoln’s timeless description of republican governance during his Gettysburg Address was dutifully addressed by the Pennsylvania Republican Senate majority by holding their hearing at the scene of that hallowed ground: “…that government of the people, by the people and for the people should not perish from this earth”.
     
    It was the South that voted to remove themselves from the union in accordance with the understanding of state sovereignty at the time. Lincoln acted contrary to the sappy words he uttered at Gettysburg in his illegal war to suppress the desires of the voters in the south by using armed force, (to save crony capitalism). Movies are rather crappy history, but this scene is close to capturing the issue of secession and showing Lincoln for what he was, a tyrant who likely stole the 1864 election.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnNWtDRrHrQ&ab_channel=COMBATSTUDY

    Replies: @Bert, @Emslander

    , @Brett Redmayne-Titley
    @Majority of One

    Thank you for your comment and further input to the article. FYI: As to the Dominion voting machines, I authored, and Ron Unz published a detailed look at these machines. There is a link embedded in this article or it can be found in my UR archive. Thanks

    , @Emslander
    @Majority of One

    If the dates of the Pennsylvania enactment of Law 77 as mentioned in the article are correct, the planned-demic and the election theft were contemplated as far back as the summer of 2019.

    Replies: @Curmudgeon

    , @Wizard of Oz
    @Majority of One

    I think it was you that provided me with a good link to a paper on mathematical proof of election fraud ...... and now you spoil it all with this which is totally barmy, and wrong as to just about all alleged facts :


    Dominion, curiously, leads us back to where the bankster cabal is headquartered, City of London. The Dominion of Canada as well as those of Australia and New Zealand all are ruled ultimately by their Governors General, who is appointed by and answers to the Quean herself. Dominion, domain, domination, dome-in-nation, damnation. They all seem to chime together, do they not?
     
  • Thank you Brett. Not just for the excellent summary of ongoing challenges, but even more for being the sole author on UNZ holding up the flag of constitutionality on this issue!!

    What I now wonder is: beyond tossing out the whole result per state (meaning no candidate gets that state’s electoral votes), do there exist also options for the Supreme Court to invalidate all mail-in ballots instead (because of the unconstitutional mail-in ballot legislation, plus there is no possibility to discern which mail-in ballots did comply with original valid legislation), and count the remainder of in-person votes as the result, potentially flipping the result?
    By gut feeling I wouldn’t expect so, but legal analysis would be appreciated!

    Addendum:
    according to a quick internet search, Wisconsin has to certify its election result on Tuesday, 12/1.

    • Replies: @Brett Redmayne-Titley
    @Mikael_

    What makes this ongoing series of the 2020 election so interesting is that it is substantially on uncharted ground that is being discovered by necessity. Case in point, the Electoral College wich, before the election, no one was paying attention to as regards its post-election importance. I wrote a detailed piece on this and now the EC is part of most major national analysis.

    As to your question on SCOTUS...the outcome is difficult to predict except that SCOTUS should use its powers to defend the republic constitutionally. This is why I have been scathing in my commentary about the use of the many salacious allegations only by Giuliani, Powell and other. SCOTUS and all appellate courts only care about constitutional challenges. Yes, allegations may bolster a case before SCOTUS but these must follow a constitutional foundational argument. This is what makes McCullough's ruling the most important one to date.

    I wish I could provide a definitive answer, but I very much doubt that SCOTUS can afford to do nothing and Alito already seems pissed. I view SCOTUS ordering new elections as a long shot, but what middle ground could be decided... that is THE question. Likely, the tea leaves will begin to settle in the coming days. B.R-T.

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Etruscan Film Star, @davidgmillsatty

  • It has been more than three weeks since election day and the incumbent U.S. president still has yet to concede defeat. Despite the media’s distraction over the perspiration of his personal attorney during a bizarre press conference, the legal team led by former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani has actually done a decent job...
  • @Peripatetic Itch
    @Mikael_


    What would be enough to change the outcome of an election in the US
     
    Giuliani has exposed the steal in one way, showing that 700,000 more mail-in ballots were counted in Pennsylvania than were mailed out.

    A forensic analysis of those heavily pro-Biden vote dumps, in Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan, also shows them to be statistically bizarre in several dimensions, with a probability of being legitimate at less than 0.01. The authors convincingly demonstrate the likelihood of election fraud:

    This is to say, the believability of these updates relies on the premise that the one or two most Biden-favoring parts of the state [Michigan] (perhaps by ballot type) were counted entirely in these two batches…. it is extremely surprising that we do not see smaller vote updates with mail-in votes which favor Biden more heavily
     
    Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020
    https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020

    They further demonstrated that the shift encompassed by these dumps was enough to throw the election in all three states.

    Here is just one of the several killer graphs of the analysis:
    https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fcda12b03-8dc6-4509-99ec-8ea432cabcdb_1062x713.png

    As we can see, all four of the vote updates in question (the two red points, the green points well above this line, and the farther-up yellow point), are well above even this line. Indeed, the least extreme of these points, represented by the lower red dot which is above the 99.5th percentile curve, is the 7th most co-extreme point out of all 8,954 vote updates, and represents the 99.92nd percentile.

     

    Replies: @Mikael_

    It was a rhetoric question towards Max [Parry.]

  • the 2020 election is not a sporting event or academic paper, therefore evidence that instances of fraud occurred will likely not be enough for the litigation to change the outcome

    Interesting statement.
    Max: What would be enough to change the outcome of an election in the US, in your opinion?
    Would the word “widespread” (looked at per State) make a difference?

    • Replies: @Peripatetic Itch
    @Mikael_


    What would be enough to change the outcome of an election in the US
     
    Giuliani has exposed the steal in one way, showing that 700,000 more mail-in ballots were counted in Pennsylvania than were mailed out.

    A forensic analysis of those heavily pro-Biden vote dumps, in Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan, also shows them to be statistically bizarre in several dimensions, with a probability of being legitimate at less than 0.01. The authors convincingly demonstrate the likelihood of election fraud:

    This is to say, the believability of these updates relies on the premise that the one or two most Biden-favoring parts of the state [Michigan] (perhaps by ballot type) were counted entirely in these two batches…. it is extremely surprising that we do not see smaller vote updates with mail-in votes which favor Biden more heavily
     
    Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020
    https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020

    They further demonstrated that the shift encompassed by these dumps was enough to throw the election in all three states.

    Here is just one of the several killer graphs of the analysis:
    https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fcda12b03-8dc6-4509-99ec-8ea432cabcdb_1062x713.png

    As we can see, all four of the vote updates in question (the two red points, the green points well above this line, and the farther-up yellow point), are well above even this line. Indeed, the least extreme of these points, represented by the lower red dot which is above the 99.5th percentile curve, is the 7th most co-extreme point out of all 8,954 vote updates, and represents the 99.92nd percentile.

     

    Replies: @Mikael_

  • An upcoming book from Antelope Hill provides meticulously sourced insight into the corrupt institutions and wealthy financiers that have created and imposed the inorganic transgender movement on the West and beyond. In The Transgender Industrial-Complex, a copy of which was provided to National Justice for review, author Scott Howard provides over 400 pages of mostly...
  • @RoatanBill
    @Anonymous

    You cowardly anonymous non boomers think gov't is supposed to provide you with whatever it is you want.

    If you're struggling, you shouldn't be contemplating creating an additional economic burden by having children.

    Cultural heritage sites are largely state worship sites featuring dead presidents and the military murders long dead. If Mount Rushmore disappeared, I certainly wouldn't miss it, for example.

    Gov't loan guarantees drove up higher education costs. If there were no loans available, the universities would have to charge what people can afford. It is the direct interference in that market that drove up the cost for today's non boomers. Gov't interference is always and everywhere the problem and never the solution.

    You non boomers have been thoroughly propagandized and indoctrinated to believe that gov't is required for all activity. Here's a flash for you - you're wrong and if you had an ounce of common sense you'd realize that.

    Replies: @Happy Tapir, @Anonymous, @obwandiyag

    You idiot. You seem to think nothing in the world exists except for the USA.

    European countries, certain Indian states, Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, etc., function just fine employing socialism to better people’s lives. The people who live in these places like this. They don’t want it to stop. They want more of it.

    That government-bashing is simple-minded 80s boilerplate. It don’t wash no more. I figure, if you drag out those hoary decrepit old chestnuts without a smidgeon of originality, and dare to present them as if they are real actual thoughts that an intelligent person might think, you are just a troll.

  • There seems to be a quasi consensus that Trump will not prevail and that Biden and Harris will get into the White House no matter what. To my surprise, even the Russian media seems to be considering that the Trump presidency is over. Yet, I am not so sure at all. Why? Because at this...
  • Trump’s demeanor during these crucial days

    It always amazes me how someone so detail-interested can let his preconceptions get the better of him, on a small detail.

    Obviously Trump is doing it exactly right here, to not let anybody seriously accuse him of unduly influencing judges etc., after he wins the legal battle.

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
  • Erich Fromm, the renowned German-Jewish social psychologist who was forced to flee his homeland in the early 1930s as the Nazis came to power, offered a disturbing insight later in life on the relationship between society and the individual. In the mid-1950s, his book The Sane Society suggested that insanity referred not simply to the...
  • @Insouciant
    @Mikael_

    The farther I got from the college bubble the less impressive did Fromm become.

    Besides, the author -- and Fromm-- view the post-war years through sentimental eyes: the most defining feature of the 'victors' was their viciousness: if insanity was to be found anywhere it was in the Allies who destroyed vast swathes of history and civilization and called it Liberation.

    Replies: @Mikael_

    Sorry if it sounded so, but I wasn’t indicating that every single word Fromm wrote was true. I came across Fromm from another author’s mention.

    Augusto Del Noce wrote:

    According to Fromm, in the second half of our [20th] century the authoritarian-obsessive- hoarding character, which appeared for the first time in the sixteenth century, was replaced by what he calls marketing character. Thereby, a true revolution took place but within the bourgeoisie (it was a transposition of the revolution into the bourgeoisie, so to speak. We can say, in words he does not use, that this transposition defines what today is called “radical society”). By “marketing character” he intends to indicate a phenomenon based on the experience of oneself as a commodity, and of one’s value not as “value of use” but as “value of exchange.” A living being becomes a commodity on display in the “personality market.” Value is established in the same way in the personality market and in the commodity market. What is on sale in the first market are personalities, in the second commodities. Thus, we reach the highest degree of reification; the reduction of people to objects becomes universal. Indeed, if the concerns of an individual center on being as desirable as possible, he will give up his I. In fact, we cannot even speak of the I as an unchangeable reality, because it must be constantly changed according to the principle of desirability. Making reification universal is clearly the same as denying ethics altogether and elevating the economic dimension to an absolute. From this perspective, efficiency becomes the only value. But this is not enough: total reification due to the marketing character coincides with the most extreme greed for things (and for other people reduced to things). Therefore, violence is absolutely dominant.

    (Bold and italic mine.)

  • President Trump gave to Israel all she could wish for; he hoped that in return, the Jews would give him America to rule another term. A simple give-and-take, but it didn’t work out as intended. If he were to run for the presidency of Israel, he would have it. If Brooklyn were to decide who’d...
  • At first I found the article detailed and interesting, that Israel seems to have the same societal implosion problems as the US – I wasn’t aware.
    But then coming across

    In the US […] stop bothering with the Jews and Israel; they have nuisance value, but nothing more.

    my B.S. meter red-lined.
    And now I’m not sure anything Shamir wrote here has unbiased, honest truth in it.

  • Erich Fromm, the renowned German-Jewish social psychologist who was forced to flee his homeland in the early 1930s as the Nazis came to power, offered a disturbing insight later in life on the relationship between society and the individual. In the mid-1950s, his book The Sane Society suggested that insanity referred not simply to the...
  • @obwandiyag
    @Mikael_

    Liar or idiot. I think idiot.

    Millions of cancer deaths prevented from banning DDT.

    Replies: @Jmaie, @Mikael_

    Liar or retard. I think both.

    Millions of Malaria deaths -mostly children- definitely occur every year (and relatively quick),
    while millions of potential cancer deaths were presumably prevented – according to which scientific source(s) exactly?

    Plus the world has tried to come up with any as good approach to reducing/eradicating Malaria for the last 50 years, and has gotten nowhere.
    And by the way, are you aware that there was Malaria in Southern US states, and it was eradicated by using DDT in the early 60’s?

    And you, as most other retards, are trying to turn the argument into a black-or-white question: “no DDT or soak everything in it”
    where the correct question would be “how much can we reduce use of DDT, while still having the immensely positve Malaria suppression effect?”