The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Hua Bin Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir ISteve Community James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Al X Griz Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred De Zayas Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Bailey Schwab Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Britannicus Brittany Smith Brooke C.D. Corax C.J. Miller Caitlin Johnstone Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar ChatGPT Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Harvin Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Courtney Alabama Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Skrbina David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Don Wassall Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens E. Geist Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Douglas Stephenson F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Key Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Ganainm Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gavin Newsom Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgia Hayduke Georgianne Nienaber Gerhard Grasruck Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Godfree Roberts Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Garros Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano H.G. Reza Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugh Perry Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras James W. Smith Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Janko Vukic Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jeremy Kuzmarov Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Mamer Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Atwill Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel Davis Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonas E. Alexis Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jorge Besada Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Correro Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth A. Carlson Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin DeAnna Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marc Sills Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Marcy Winograd Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Battaglioli Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Neville Hodgkinson Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Haenseler Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani R, Weiler Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Raymond Wolters Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Faussette Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Rob Crease Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Rose Pinochet RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Seaghan Breathnach Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Starr Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sybil Fares Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Wyatt Reed Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Austin Metcalf Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betar US Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Canary Mission Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Kushner Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlie Kirk Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colombia Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story Covert Action COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Crypto Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Cole David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Deportation Abyss Deportations Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Easter Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Enoch Powell Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve FEMA Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franklin Scandal Franz Boas Fraud Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom Freemasons French French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Flotilla GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Hell Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Huddled Masses Huey Newton Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Inbreeding Income Income Tax India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA Javier Milei JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Paul Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Miller Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Karmelo Anthony Kash Patel Kashmir Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry Ellison Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Maria Corina Machado Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Immigration Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monopoly Monotheism Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natanz Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Deal New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New Testament New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz Noam Chomsky Nobel Peace Prize Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition Nvidia NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise OFAC Oil Oil Industry OJ Simpson Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palantir Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Craig Roberts Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Petro Poroshenko Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Postindustrialism Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qasem Soleimani Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quiet Skies R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race-Ism Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rare Earths Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Red Sea Refugee Crisis Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romans Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds Roy Cohn RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satan Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Bessent Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Steven Witkoff Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tariffs Tatars Taxation Taxes Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Congress US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US State Department USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Civilization Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Race White Racialism White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Whitney Webb Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zohran Mamdani Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
m___
Comments
• My
Comments
588 Comments • 103,700 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    The banning of four Nation of Islam Black history books by Amazon, the largest bookseller in the world, provides a perfect opportunity to examine the wickedly racist ways Jewish power is wielded in America. Amazon provided no warning, no reason, no hearing, and no opportunity to respond—it was a blatant mockery of Amazon founder Jeffrey...
  • m___ says:

    On the article, the Nomi Prins article in parallel. Since they come close both to the old school boxing “duck and bob” of Cassius, alas Mohammad Ali-Clay

    Starting from the premise: before deciding on principle and what to govern for, to show justice and muster achievement… get in charge.

    It has shown to be hard to live in a residence where one does not have access to the light switch. The European descend people of the US, are no longer in charge, have not been in charge for a long period of time. To be optimistic, in mind and spirit, at the least the start of the twentieth century shows fully their decay. In their own “homelands” Continental Europe and the Northern Americas they became the under-class and powerless middle class of society. They have only themselves to blame. By complacency they created their parasite elites, the corrupt, rotten core of their own demise.

    Jews have been laboring, and continue to do so, to take control, and were successful, they control the money supply, pull the puppets of governance, and play at their whim the credulous and dumbed down “American”, and average French-German-Dutch Westerner (as probably most commoners and middle class scramblers see themselves as Americans). The Russians escaped largely since the cluster around Putin seems capable of bargaining on scale, indeed they have as few grown more expensive, a tighter group to dominate and ridicule. The Chinese are exempt for now, by scaffolding US economics they learned their lesson and made a full U-turn.

    The Jewish all-in effort took and takes hard work, and they should be given credit for it. As whatever the situation prescribes ethnic or religious Jews should be grateful to their elites.

    [MORE]

    The deceit and complications to achieve deceit are growing, so a full-time machinery of operatives for scraps as here on unz.com, make a living and shove their ambitions a day ahead. A Nomi Prins at the low end, a Shamir, a Karlin, a Sailer, would not exist if their would be no agenda. That is the crucial thing, agenda. The agenda being the interests of the global elites, in majority Jewish, the Jewish middle class roped by the crumbs. The elites themselves largely bonded and controlled by the Jewish time honed mindset of control and having the stamina and will power to attend control. The European descend puppets in supposedly positions of control, the Presidency, the Congress, International trade, mining, media, in no particular order but first and foremost the Financial Machinery of deceit, are wallowing and content with the scraps. Doormats, and it will not help them, whatever denomination of identity that can be peddled is waiting at the front door. Immigration means exponential political control.

    As for the US, in a system that uses “money”, the dollar denomination, as a compensatory tool of measure for real riches, the opaque powers first, then physical riches over timelines, sources of control as oil, maritime assent, military hardware, control over the global masses, real estate, save-havens to dwell for the rich, in short a life for the few …there is no other generating tool as the money supply control.

    The Federal Reserve, the Wholesale of Money, is the barter and trade, nothing special, could have been rags or salt, and anything from there, and internationally, provides the generator for power. That is where Jewish control of financial capitalism starts and end, that is where the whole of the machinery can be reduced to shambles, and a minuscule minority of Jews will be seen peddling socks and zircon diamonds to the middle class, seducing Hollywood midgets, uptight dames in the streets of New York for a pelt of fur.

    Now to cut short, does the American Commoner understand first, then have the balls to act upon above in all and every aspect. We think not. This is pardoned, the processing power is not there, and the sugar slump and consumerism has rendered the most into obese slobs. Outliers are clipped by their own. A game of soccer will generate more pulses in the skull of most then anything beyond their cocoon of corn syrup and palm oil.

    The hopes is the middle classes, they must have felt the pressure over the last thirty years, our theory, since bred for submission, as slaves and rightfully so over five thousand years and more, homogeneity as a desirable result, it leaves an imprint on most to follow and obey their rulers (a Jewish upper class, individualism requires them to see any authority the facto as not strained by in-group motivations), and instead of intrusive operating on the systemics they desist. Myopy, and again, the downside of individualism (heavily exploited by the Jew power machine), obliging, egotistic behavior. No adventure, no force, no hardship, slaving in relative comfort. No identity, please provide us one. That goes up to the top.

    To get back to the merry go round, Nomi Prins does not mention the Federal Reserve for it’s role, is not explicit on Jewish role playing. As for NOI, they must have brokered a deal or about to, with Jewish interests to the advantage of both their elites. Sincerely do individuals, in a continuous desfile, as Ilhan Omar and the five hundred or so others that flash in shorter and shorter bursts, over a single day, on media and public outlets, have the assent to decide even on the color of their underwear. They tend to get prettier though, that in graphical display, would be a feat of cliometrics.

    It is hard to reverse engineer the little kiddies games of power of our infantile elites, and that is a happy feature. It indicates fully that our elites are feeling the pressure, they, and in America and Europe first, seem to be incapable of coherent action beyond a few moves, beyond the short term. That leaves the issues that face the world unattended. These sadly do not have to do with power games within the confinements of the human skull.

    Do European descend peoples, with a mindset of Enlightenment, Individualism, Equality and Respect, the tolerance (and only that) of Christianism, the rituals created over centuries, stand a chance to retake control of the power knobs? Plunk into the global basket the genetics of their best of kin? The above understanding could help the howto.

  • Rep. Ilhan Omar equivocally-unequivocally apologized for tweeting that Zionist power was “all about the Benjamins.” A few weeks later, she didn’t apologize at all for suggesting that American congressional representatives shouldn’t have to swear loyalty oaths to Israel. But Rep. Omar did in fact issue one genuinely unequivocal apology. It involved this 2012 tweet: “It’s...
  • @Germanicus
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Yes, and the noticeable leftist undertone in his radio shows makes it so suspicious, he sounds sometimes like Cem Özdemir, the green marxist.
    We got tons of these leftist Muslims in Germany, quite a lot of them in reality Dönmeh or Iranian Jews, and many muslim brothers with ties to FRG regime and turkish intel.
    My prediction is, Omar will achieve professional and protected victim status for Muslims too, they operate similar to the jewish lobby.
    Muslim lobby orgs in Europe are usually financed by jewish and saudi or turkish money. They read from the same script, "hate speech" and all this kind of nonsense, or, my view is, the jews offer the muslims Europe in exchange for Greater Israel.
    If it wasn't for Israel, Jews and Muslims have historically always worked together against Christian Europe.
    Presstv has the same nonsensical marxist sorrosian undertone since Rouhani took over.
    Just look at their guests, Becker, Soros funded etc ...

    Due to 'war on terror' and demonization of Muslims in US by the media, its quite clever by the leftist jews to use a Muslim as a puppet, but it is not something new.
    Cui bono?
    However, it is pretty sad, that it takes a Muslim in the US, the alleged land of the free and home of the brave, to just speak out the blatantly obvious facts.
    Its a bit like the emperor's new clothes, where Omar plays the child who says, that the emperor is naked.

    Replies: @jacques sheete, @m___

    However, it is pretty sad, that it takes a Muslim in the US, the alleged land of the free and home of the brave, to just speak out the blatantly obvious facts.
    Its a bit like the emperor’s new clothes, where Omar plays the child who says, that the emperor is naked.

    All in the public eye is scripted, layers and layers of drab, real power is stealth. Imagine, if one has real ambitions, beyond personal rags to riches, why hunker in Congress? Puppets are on strings, pretty, petty and not.

  • @AaronB
    @geokat62

    The immune system is what fights off disease. If your immune system is too weak, no medicine will help. Its why HIV patients die of simple infections despite the existence of antibiotics.

    You have an infection now. You should focus on strengthening your immune system.

    Now, articles like this weaken the immune system. They make your enemy seem really strong and you really weak. This is the exact opposite of the kind of propaganda you should be producing.

    All healthy people glorify themselves and minimize the enemy. Jews typically minimize the achievement of whites and glorify and extol the achievements of Jews. You would never catch Jews producing articles like this where whites are seen as superhumanly powerful and as having been on top since time immemorial. Its unthinkable.

    No healthy people with a will to power do that.

    Look at the Chinese. Many of them are coming out with this narrative that Western dominance was an accidental recent affair, and the world is returning to its natural state of Chinese dominance. This is obviously historically untrue, but its the kind of bullshit propaganda that a healthy people with a will to power will naturally produce.

    If whites had any will to power, they would naturally be producing propaganda narratives that extol themselves and minimize Jews.

    Its permissible to cast yourselves as victims as the Jews and Asians do but the narrative has to be a backhanded compliment as it is with them. It must be that whites temporarily stumbled and were taken advantage of.

    It absolutely cannot be that white culture was completely healthy but Jews were so powerful with such mysterious powers that they were able to single handedly bring it down. This is ruinous for white self confidence.

    The Chinese say they were temporarily in a bad place and decadent and whites were able to take advantage of them, but through their own efforts they are now returning to their natural state. They wouldn't dream of saying whites were so powerful as to be able to destroy a perfectly healthy Chinese culture.

    You also absolutely cannot pretend that Jews were always on top, casting them as a natural upper class throughout historical times. Jewish success has to be seen as temporary and recent, as no different than other groups who were briefly on top - definitely, definitely not as some permanent thing.

    Listen my friend - the intellect is the servant of the will. It is not neutral. It cannot look at things with perfect objectivity.

    The narratives being posted on Unz about the Jewish white relationship are not neutral and objective - they are motivated narratives, but betray a clear desire for whites to be inferior, and not accidental victims, but permanent interiors.

    This is why I say you are being scammed here. There is more than enough historical material to develop a propaganda narrative that glorifies whites, as Jews and Asians do about themselves. But under the guise of objectivity you are being presented with motivated narratives that subtly undermine white self confidence using short term emotional bait. The entire white commentariat at Anatoly Karlins blog is complicit in this, as well as Sailer, etc.

    Wake up. Your starting point should be will to power. You then retrofit your narrative to that while sticking to reality and truth as much as possible. Any historical fact can be seen from multiple perspectives. You choose the one that builds up your immune system and makes you healthy.

    And don't be fooled by "objectivity" - it does not exist. It cannot exist. As human beings, we are "interested" parties. You'd have to stand outside the universe to be objective. And you couldn't have any biological drives or be concerned with survival.

    Objectivity is the favourite guise of people who have lost their will to power and are motivated to produce narratives that self-undermine and are anything but objective.

    They rely on the belief that no one wishes to undermine themselves so anyone who has conqueres his natural desire to think well of himself and undermines himself must be objective.

    But its not true. People who have lost their will to power are interested in undermining themselves, not out of objectivity, but for the same emotion reasons everyone comes up with any narrative.

    Replies: @m___, @geokat62, @Incitatus, @Talha

    Again, thanks for peeling the layers of the onion.

  • @AaronB
    These articles which describe Jews as superhumanly powerful since time immemorial only serve Jewish interests, in the guise of opposing them.

    You are being scammed. Your emotions are being manipulated. You're told its not your fault, it's the Jews fault, which feels good in the short term. That's the bait.

    But the long term effect is insidious. You are being conditioned to see Jews as irresistibly powerful. To see their current dominance not as a temporary blip that follows the same rules as every other nation that has been temporarily on top, but as something eternal.

    The subtle message is that Jews are too strong for you to fight, have mysterious powers you can't even understand, and have always been on top. But don't feel bad - you have no agency, so its not your fault.

    It's a double whammy of undermining your belief in your own agency while simultaneously establishing Jewish credentials as the natural dominant class that has always been on top.

    All with the bait of short term emotional feel-good.

    I have shown articles like this to nationalistic orthodox Jewish friends, and they are not at all dismayed.

    It's very similar to the IQ boondoggle - which also offers short term emotional bait at the coat of implanting long term submission to elites, using bullshit pseudo-science.

    1) White culture undermined itself. Only then did Jews seize power.

    2) Jews have no effect on fundamentally healthy cultures. They have zero special powers.

    3) Jews have no special powers. They are like every other group that reached the top for a while, like the British or the Romans, who all got to the top by being more stubborn and motivated relative to their competitors, who often were in their decadent phase, like the Greeks.

    4) Jewish tactics are a mixture of propaganda and bullying and no different than any used by a dominant group, adjusted to circumstances. The rules for wielding power are universal. It may look like alchemy to the powerless, but it follows simple rules, and are always the same.

    5) The group with more motivation wins, even of its much smaller. Intellect and talent always serve power, never the other way around. The ruling class is never the most intelligent, whatever myths it tells itself. The ruling class is always the most motivated and stubborn. The Roman relationship to the much cleverer and more sophisticated Greeks is the template for this. Or the stolid beef-eating Briton to the lax colonial peoples.

    6) Jews produce far fewer intelligent people than whites. They are dominant because of stubbornness, while whites have specifically specialized in creating a culture of mild reasonablenes, tolerance, etc.

    7) Modern European culture has specialized in intellect, and neglected character. It will naturally be vulnerable to cultures that focus on character. Intellect always served character. This is true even in the individual. The intellect provides no goals. It carries out the goals of the emotions.

    8) Like every other people that has been on top for a while, Jewish power is temporary. It relies on no mysterious superhuman powers. In fact its rather stupid, like all power. Its like a sledge hammer.

    9) The focus should be on making white culture healthy again. The Jewish problem will then solve itself. It is only an issue in unhealthy cultures.

    Replies: @m___, @anarchyst, @jbwilson24, @wayfarer, @atlantis_dweller, @Art

    Thanks for peeling the onion.

  • @Hamlet's Ghost
    @Haxo Angmark

    The infinite financial reserves that can be created with a few keystrokes are the reactor of the globalist death star. With these infinite reserves they can buy ANYTHING. Corporations, governments, academia, media, anything at all.

    It'a hard to fight an enemy who has the keys to your ammo box.

    Replies: @jacques sheete, @m___

    The infinite financial reserves that can be created with a few keystrokes

    …then peddled as debt to jacques sheete’s “empty skulls” of the commoner and the thoroughly stumped middle class, completely and persistently incapable to grasp that money and economics is a religion (not that they should be). Once one stops to believe in it, the lure is gone.

    When will this end? We see the bubble of shifting theoretical “value” to fewer profiteers as getting more theoretical then real. Pollution, toxicity, ghetto living, a hyper complications rife global systemic will get rid of our elites in their present form. But first the masses, the easy one to accomplish.

  • @dube
    @Reisen

    "...logic was invented by the Jews."

    How does Aristotle fit into this history?

    Replies: @m___

    Psychology as in refined manipulation, the “hypnosis” of the article, not logic, rational thinking, using variables and parameters that behold their meaning from one scheme to another. Not goal oriented, conceptual thinking beyond immediate interests. That was more of a Socrates.

    The Jewish mindset is about ankle biting and when possible swallowing the cow. The humbleness in the process is mind boggling.

    Socrates was probably not Jewish, although if you let them… Then he never is published on unz.com, a reference.

  • In conclusion, I offer an obligatory disclaimer that should go without saying: Obviously Jewish elites are not the only people in the mass hypnosis business. All governments and corporations hypnotize their subjects and personnel into loyal obedience. All religion involves a degree of mass hypnosis; and mysticism, the heart of religion, involves a degree of self-hypnosis. And even parents routinely hypnotize their children to sleep with repetitious storytelling. Some of this, perhaps much of this, is normal and healthy. My point is that Jewish elites have been unusually successful in employing hypnotic mass manipulation for self-aggrandizing purposes, and that today’s Zionist elites are doing so in strikingly immoral and destructive ways.

    Best article over the last two years, scope matters, detailed enough, and inducing all of the essential variables needed for understanding the Jewish mindset in all of it’s “biodiversity” . And told so flat footedly, linear a draw, as that of a steam-engine, (intentional beyond doubt), so the ninety nine percent of the unz.com niche public can understand.

    Now before we subscribe us to your own “hypnosis”, let’s write our own disclaimer. All of the facets mentioned figure loosely in the eight thousand words of our comments over the last year.

    Ilhan Omar, an ambitious wretch, if not, let her come forward on her own terms, and devoid of her elite cognitive manipulators and financing, is an omnipresent example of Jewish manipulation as a method. The “Jewish” approach is applied generously to her, and in parallel, in case of divine provision pointing to some other opportunistic brat, she is the perfect choice of a graphical and sonical to the “pleasure” center of mass commodity Americans.

    Another loose thought, hard to grasp apparently here on unz.com, the intro Jewish relationships between the commodity Jew and their proper elites, was well pointed at in the article.

    As for WASP elites allowing the rallying (started before the Civil War America) and then take over, “coup d’etat” unbridled, of Jewish elites in academics, politics, Deep State, we give it a ninety to ten bargain quota proportionality. The ninety percent reckons out in ignominious ignorance, profound intellectual numbness, cowardice, drugged on to the “magic” part. Mind, the despise for their own (White commoners) by the “Clintonian” elites, should be seen as a neutral factor, Jewish elites are much harsher in that aspect to their own deplorables. If not for welfare “poor” ethnical Euro-descend Jewish breeders in a city as New-York, would not cluster inside, but spill around the city trash cans.

    The “Jewish” exclusive cluster around Ron Unz, his inner circle, then profetizing to the White middle classes is no coincidence of method and tactics.

    What is the breaking point of the “Thousand Year Rule”? Probably because of the rational systemic weaknesses in long term thinking, engineering of intelligent progress, measured in enduring solutions that balance to real progress is profoundly unfocused in the Jew mindset. It is all about direct, immediate manipulation, not long term results.

    To the “White Elites”, your article is not straight forward, it seems they cannot unlink any longer, the grasp is tight. They must be sensitive to a certain extend that they are profoundly despised in their current ways and shapes, take a Tony Blair as one of the outstanding examples, not only by their own, which was never much an issue for elites anywhere, when contention is still well in place, but by their own masters, the Jewish mind and ethnic-religious omnipresent Jewish elites. That intellectually they compromised their own nature, their genetic and cultural heritage, their ID proper, a history distinct from the historical traject of the Jew is shameful (also shameless). All “handles” are compromised, the Vatican, local governments, the Global Government, the Corporate precursors, a peddler middle class in justice, science, police forces, the military.

    The above notes were done in a short burst, so their will be some spell and grammatical errors, we care, but timeliness is a factor. We expect to be shoved to the end of the queue as often the case.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    @m___

    "Ilhan Omar, an ambitious wretch..."

    -- And what is your opinion of yourself?

    This woman has shown a strength of character. Is this ability intolerable for you?

    Enjoy: https://ifamericaknew.org/TheLobby/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=c9da6fa6-ce81-4102-a54b-2216a90ba156&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=c9da6fa6-ce81-4102-a54b-2216a90ba156

    Replies: @jacques sheete

    , @Wally
    @m___

    Put down the pills, dude.

  • Forty-nine people were killed in shootings at two mosques in central Christchurch, New Zealand, on Friday, in a terrorist attack that Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern described as “an extraordinary and unprecedented act of violence.” • Officials said that one man in his late 20s had been charged with murder, and that two explosive devices were...
  • @A123
    All sides have been spun up to be permanently hostile to each other. Who started what first is no longer relevant. At this point the only practical option is to separate the sides.

    If there are no Christians in Muslim nations, Christians cannot attack Muslim homes or mosques. If there are no Muslims in Christian countries, Muslims cannot attack churches or concert halls.

    The pagan Globalist Elites encouraged mass migration and "tolerance". This is now a proven failure. The countries that accepted the most migrants have the most violence. Notably -- Sweden, France, and Germany.

    The biggest problem now is, how to achieve disengagement. There are large numbers of people who need to return home before peace can be achieved, and at this point neither Merkel nor Macron has the will.

    Unfortunately, the violence and counter-violence and counter-counter-violence will continue to escalate until the Globalist Elites are removed from power and their undermining of democratic values can be reversed.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @m___

    The interests of the de facto elites are distinct from those of the global masses. “Settings” as this weeks Gaza bombings, the New Zealand incident, Jemen bombing of civilians are laboratory experiments of what is possible. Migrations, teasing immigration, while raping and reaping the Third World, Africa in substance, regardless of Chinese, France, the US, but always the global corporate profiteers, are workable tactics, it seems to go un-noticed to the crowds. A game of Real Madrid soccer team attracts more viewers. Any “intellectual” who cannot see through this, is middle class with egotistic interests, scrambling for the crumbs and part of the problem. A traitor.

    The emotional discharges as most above, are not very helpful to take on analysis of the essentials, what counts, what is survival in the long term. In case of global elites defunct of any morals, alternative leadership, alternative philosophy, systemic change must be built independently. We should not accent the blame on individuals trying to alter the paradigm. Whether ISIS or now a single White male, they are irrelevant as to the outcome, they count in pointing to what hurts: lack of alternative leadership, sain sustainable global systemics, a need.

  • Over at SlateStarCodex.com, Scott Alexander reviews poetry. For example: Okay, that's not Homer at his best -- it doesn't actually make sense. But it is not bad considering that it was made up by an artificial intelligence program, GPT-2, trained on the Gutenberg Poetry Corpus of pre-copyright poems by gwern (I'm a little vague on...
  • @Autochthon
    @m___

    That's great; very clever: You wrote a a string of disjointed sentence-fragments in the style of so-called artificial intelligence to get in on the fun Mr. Sailer is having while criticising the technology's shortcomings and inability to do what your own writing here also fails to achieve: coherent thought and communication.

    Very postmodern and ironic of you. Bravo zulu!

    Replies: @m___

    fails to achieve: coherent thought and communication.

    Our explanation of what IA can and more importantly cannot do, i-s meant to be coherent. If jokingly you pose as not to have noticed, has nothing to debase it.

    Repeating algorithms and conditionals, pumping in more variables then a human can glut, are used in anything from biology of genetics, to admittedly, and nefariously the summit of hype, stock exchanges and the US Central Bank.

  • @Anon
    @m___


    Now let’s say this is simple, (AI) a library of words, a small language with conditionals as to what can appear where, conditionals of what constitutes the ID of every word
     
    That's pretty much exactly what this is. It's slightly more sophisticated than shuffling a deck of index cards with Homeric phrases on them.

    AI would mean correcting the output, rewrite the library, retry and test the outcome.
     
    And how would it know which output was correct and what wasn't (ie according to human sensibilities)? It doesn't. The AI has no idea what it's doing.

    I find this AI Christmas carol extremely creepy. They're trying to learn our traditions! It won't be long now...

    http://digg.com/video/ai-christmas-carol

    "The best Christmas present in the world is a blessing..." Hmm maybe AI knows something we don't after all...

    Replies: @m___

    And how would it know which output was correct and what wasn’t (ie according to human sensibilities)?

    The correct outcome is according to the weight of the words, which acts and accounts for on the basis of the rest of the library. More or less as humans do, in Church what sounds right, is not related to what goes in Congress.

    You seem to be missing the important element, what simplifies and predicts better then what human garble ever did – does. When “AI” builds an outcome, it is reproducible, if not there must be a bug.

    In the human world the bug is the politician and the weight of the outcome, is attached to the Central Bank, who are the “primitive” of the library used by AI. The difference here is symptomic, the Central Bank algorithm is far more advanced, it changes value pairs according to the weather. Global Warming at work.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @m___

    Do you dream?

  • Really and truly, I did not expect the most promising developments in West-European politics to come from Italy. Who could predict that the strange government appointed in June 2018 – an uneasy alliance of nationalists under Matteo Salvini’s Lega and the populist-but-vague Five-Star Movement – would last as long or achieve as much as it...
  • @The Alarmist

    "The over-educated media-political elites really are weirdos in this respect, completely out of touch with regular people."
     
    That's giving them the benefit of the doubt: It could really be that they are Criminal Elite weaponising migrant invaders to reduce their native populations to poverty and insecurity to strip them of any remaining assets and liberties they had gained since the end of Feudalism.

    Replies: @Guillaume Durocher, @m___

    That’s giving them the benefit of the doubt: It could really be that they are Criminal Elite weaponising migrant invaders to reduce their native populations to poverty and insecurity to strip them of any remaining assets and liberties they had gained since the end of Feudalism.

    Indeed and many other tactics, short term patches for mending will follow. Now understand us right, power politics, the art of the possible to advance elite interests, has not thought this “problem” through.

    What is the problem: financial capitalism needs a growing global population ultimately. Well it does not, and the elites do not seem to grasp this. The systemics should change, that would de-stress global populations, rewire them, and ultimately reduce numbers. …To the point where global population numbers are assets again, as hard-wired into the human psychology, and not the liabilities they, the global masses, represent today. Commoners do not instinctively understand this, offer (growing world populations) ultimately diminishes value …to the point of even a twenty seven year old middle class youngster, university educated, becomes a liability. Rewiring the masses is risible. Rewiring the elites, is the only option.

    Not climate change (a partial off-shoot) but global human numbers, proportionality and toxicity (derivatives of “heated” financial transactions) will be solved only by paying attention to above. Will this be the twist, and better still, will the U-turn be timely? Well, the hope in the short term of understanding human genetics and it’s biology, and what can be called the precursor of AI, (big data analysis) are about our only hopes.

    To be discouraged, the short term patch of Universal Income, to us, for reasons of not coping with the decrease of human creativity per capita. To be discouraged, war, since it has a disproportional impact of derivatives versus outcome, to the point past being obsolete.

    This is a comment, a mere hint into possible venueways.

  • Over at SlateStarCodex.com, Scott Alexander reviews poetry. For example: Okay, that's not Homer at his best -- it doesn't actually make sense. But it is not bad considering that it was made up by an artificial intelligence program, GPT-2, trained on the Gutenberg Poetry Corpus of pre-copyright poems by gwern (I'm a little vague on...
  • If (AI) can produce this outcome once, it should be repeatable. Now let’s say this is simple, (AI) a library of words, a small language with conditionals as to what can appear where, conditionals of what constitutes the ID of every word, could be more then one(?), …then this is not what should be understood as AI. AI would mean correcting the output, rewrite the library, retry and test the outcome. That would be when done, even a single cycle, and fed the same input primitive worthy of AI denomination. Not done, not yet.

    The good thing, when data are fed to a machine, and the blobs can be huge compared to the possible amount “digestible” to a human mind, and the algorithms and libraries ( instructions a a ream, sort of a sophisticated dictionary), the outcome should be identical. If not that would be called a “bug”. And to be ment. In the case of AI by the machine, in the case of above text by human interference.

    Where as a human processor, would come up with different outcomes unpredictably, a design feature, applauded in politicians and actors (same breed, though actors tend to be better looking), a machine would be persistent in making the “mistake” consequently. So yes, data research is meaningful. And AI is nonexistent by above definition as of yet. Reservations made, who knows some obscure Count processed Dracula, time is a factor.

    • Replies: @Autochthon
    @m___

    That's great; very clever: You wrote a a string of disjointed sentence-fragments in the style of so-called artificial intelligence to get in on the fun Mr. Sailer is having while criticising the technology's shortcomings and inability to do what your own writing here also fails to achieve: coherent thought and communication.

    Very postmodern and ironic of you. Bravo zulu!

    Replies: @m___

    , @Anon
    @m___


    Now let’s say this is simple, (AI) a library of words, a small language with conditionals as to what can appear where, conditionals of what constitutes the ID of every word
     
    That's pretty much exactly what this is. It's slightly more sophisticated than shuffling a deck of index cards with Homeric phrases on them.

    AI would mean correcting the output, rewrite the library, retry and test the outcome.
     
    And how would it know which output was correct and what wasn't (ie according to human sensibilities)? It doesn't. The AI has no idea what it's doing.

    I find this AI Christmas carol extremely creepy. They're trying to learn our traditions! It won't be long now...

    http://digg.com/video/ai-christmas-carol

    "The best Christmas present in the world is a blessing..." Hmm maybe AI knows something we don't after all...

    Replies: @m___

  • Really and truly, I did not expect the most promising developments in West-European politics to come from Italy. Who could predict that the strange government appointed in June 2018 – an uneasy alliance of nationalists under Matteo Salvini’s Lega and the populist-but-vague Five-Star Movement – would last as long or achieve as much as it...
  • On Italy, Salvini,

    Not the complete package, nor can “Italy” as a territory be elevated to international action. But seen the total context. Salvini, the better bet for now.

    The real problem of migration ( as some eloquent commenter mentions the in AND the out), is global populations, proportionality of global populations, both inferred from the global financial system ultimately. If the subject stays taboo, there is no generational solution in view.

    Africa, is the hunting grounds, many things are consequences, and have their causes in European and Russian, US and Chinese interferences. That is not to say that there should be none, but the globalism in reflected reality is far different from a sane, long term planetary overview, goals, ideas and concepts of value.

    Still globalism of sorts must be. Air and water, toxic waste makes territory as a concept of local risible. Automation and other factors make for human masses that are, on an individual basis, regardless of groupings, liabilities not assets. The worse can be seen, for one, in continent Africa the backyard of Europe well merited.

    • LOL: apollonian
  • Here is Brenton Tarrant's manifesto. He comes off as a living repository of /pol/ memes. Personally, I think we need to punish the enablers of Far Right terrorism. Well past time the hateful anti-Semite PewDiePie was kicked off YouTube and Putler got more sanctions. EDIT 2019.03.18: Seems there is a concerned campaign to get the...
  • Not sure if the Zealand event is the bigger slaughter of the day. Israel has been bombing Gaza. It seems the death toll will be dwarfed by conventional players over the week.

    What could be a side note, as to the efficiency to comparable miscarriages all over the globe, the single, European descend assailant, unfortunately got the better scores on record.

    Playing into the fears of the general populations, this occurrence can be easily abused. This is the invitation to political stances stretch awaited for.

    Just some more loose thoughts on the matter, as Muslims go, such a banditry would be mostly ignored. As proven to date.

    To end, on an even note, approval or disgust is not intended to be addressed here, there will be enough of that all over. It seems that tensions between subgroups at the bottom of society are escalating. That in itself has to do with elite misconduct, and distrust for the latter. The patching must be done at the high end of global society. An illusion of well-being, a feel of identity must be left alone. And as for the West, it seems that gender and social status seem to become inadequate tags to identity.

  • 5:05 AM. February 4, 2012. It’s almost pitch dark. No one has slept this night. The only morning illumination comes from scores of dimly glowing dots of blues, greens, yellows, reds or orange inside a patchwork of hundreds of still standing tents. Most sit empty for the first time in months; a lamp left on...
  • @niteranger
    This essay is nothing more than a rambling article of naivete with the exception of the part on Assange. Mandel was a communist and a fraud --don't quote him. Obama infiltrated the Occupy movement and destroyed it. How fucking dumb can you be? You can attack middle class white people but you'll never attack Wall Street. Why do you think the rich Jews of Wall Street pay Obama so much for his speeches? Did you ever hear them? He's a complete clown however, they know how he protected them including his destruction of Occupy which is never talked about by the so called Progressives. They were too busy blowing him metaphorically speaking to see what he was doing during his eight years.

    Colbert and the Magic Jew Stewart are part of the Wall Street Corporate System. They are there for one reason to lead everyone astray. Attack the whites while Jews of Wall Street raped the country. All these movements are nothing more the mental masturbation by people who have a child like understand in thinking they will overthrow the system. The Deep State is part of Wall Street. They work for each other. They will allow the blacks and other minorities to destroy the whites of Western Civilization because they are afraid of the intelligence of the whites. They know the minorities can be controlled by giving them free stuff--whether it's fake degrees or money.

    Assange's biggest crime is that he has exposed the inner workings of the Deep State and how there are no governments just the Corporate Fascist Military-Industrial-Intelligence Police State. He showed how they are interrelated world wide and that it's global conspiracy against the citizens of each country or state. They want him dead.

    You will never change the system until you control the monetary-social pathways and the Jews say just try it and we will send the Deep State Thugs to get you--because we own them all and now we own the right to think and to speak.

    Replies: @m___

    Assange’s biggest crime is that he has exposed the inner workings of the Deep State and how there are no governments just the Corporate Fascist Military-Industrial-Intelligence Police State. He showed how they are interrelated world wide and that it’s global conspiracy against the citizens of each country or state. They want him dead.

    Assange impersonates a first. A venue-way of allowing discontented and mindful individuals to efficiently, and repeatedly expose systemic functional and dysfunctional attitudes and methods of global elites, their infighting and agreement on method.

    By allowing “perpetrators” to stay anonymous, embedded in the tissue of the systemics, even preserve a personal life away from being “martyrs”, to strike another time is the original promise of the internet. Reducing most possibilities for damage control by the authorities. Doxing the culprits in parallel.

    Even graphically, and tastefully, thus breaching the hard-nutted general public, the infamous clipping of some cluster of incapacitated humans over Bagdad was real, as only now porn and Hollywood is allowed on the web.

    Then Assange as an individual, the prestance, presence of the icon, the personality and brains to extrovert the moral stances. Finally his ultimately courageous stance out of the embassy, while the pressure of the whole of world elites weighted on him. This will go into history as unique. Wikileaks alone exploited the full capacity of the internet. The rest is quacking with limited scope.

    Brains and balls, an individual stance, a principled stance, a mind cold enough to entwine technical prowess and content, ethnical Europeans wrote history as to his genes, and that was a long time due. A man of substance, not a billy-o-naire, not a product of financial capitalism, how can it be?

    Now to kill him staight-forwardly and burning him in the “pizza” oven as the Saoudis did, seems unacceptable to the crowds. To silence him what a nose-thumb to the elites, the nag persists, perdures.

    Snowden has given in, and is forgiven, he cannot make a stance since physical insulation is no option to him. In genetics parlay, Assange, what a deadly mutation, coincidence and driven turned into providence, a rare thing in human history.

    • LOL: apollonian
  • In the latest entry of my Escape from America series, I interview an American who’s living in Russia, a country that’s been relentlessly demonized by the Western media. To a minority of Americans, however, Russia is a nationalist beacon, or even a possible refuge, as it already is to many Afrikaners. How long have you...
  • Content of value to inexperienced travelers of continents. Condensed to a tool-kit. The twist of staging an interview is fun, and granted.

    So true, the zest for adventure and detachment is bred out of the Western European genome.

  • 5:05 AM. February 4, 2012. It’s almost pitch dark. No one has slept this night. The only morning illumination comes from scores of dimly glowing dots of blues, greens, yellows, reds or orange inside a patchwork of hundreds of still standing tents. Most sit empty for the first time in months; a lamp left on...
  • @WorkingClass
    I'm sure there must be a pony in there somewhere. But this is just more creative writing than I can stand. Is it just me? Occupy Wall Street had my sympathy. But I could have told them that an unarmed occupation is like a fart in the wind.

    Replies: @m___, @Wizard of Oz

    Lowering standards on unz.com.

    About the Author: Brett Redmayne-Titley has published over 170 in-depth articles over the past eight years for news agencies worldwide. Many have been translated. On-scene reporting from important current events has been an emphasis that has led to his many multi-part exposes on such topics as the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations, NATO summit, Keystone XL Pipeline, Porter Ranch Methane blow-out, Hizbullah in Lebanon, Erdogan’s Turkey and many more. He can be reached at: live-on-scene ((at)) gmx.com. Prior articles can be viewed at his archive: http://www.watchingromeburn.uk

    Alas, stand in for clutter, nothing-ness of content, and caduque writing. The author must be well meaning but should look elsewhere to peddle his wares.

    This piece is a confusing thread in the intellectual echo chamber of the author. Better clear your thinking Sir, —and we are afraid that is not possible to the degree necessary, before trying to make a point to the outside. A case of below grade journalism-fiction-blogging. Nothing this year and last comes close to the lack of quality in thinking and expression here on unz.com. The longest and most laborious mind-fart by anybody writing on this blog. All authors have stood to higher standards.

    On top, you seem such a well intentioned person, is that how you got the slot?

  • A teenage girl who did not play soccer magically became a star soccer recruit at Yale. Cost to her parents: $1.2 million. A high school boy eager to enroll at the University of Southern California was falsely deemed to have a learning disability so he could take his standardized test with a complicit proctor who...
  • @Alden
    When The Sopranos was still on I thought of a great subplot to run through 5 or 6 episodes. the son AJ was dumb as a stone manic depressive and useless.

    AJ GOES TO HARVARD

    Carmela decides to use one of those college admission counselors. Its an agressive woman who runs the business. She counsels Carmela that the only chance is for AJ to check the black box. OKAY
    Some one, probably a poverty stricken genius Asian kid is hired to take AJ's SAT's using a forged ID
    The counselor writes a splendid "poor, poor' pitiful me" essay about the trials and travails of growing up a rich black kid in private school in one of the wealthiest towns on the east coast. " I was discriminated against, beaten abused blah blah blah. My grandma was active in the Scotttsboro case. MyDad was an original black panther who robbed the and killed the police officer. I march to free mumbai mumbo jumbo. His transcript is of course tampered with, maybe they hire a hacker who helps the husband with his nefarious rackets disguised as legitimate business.

    The best will be AJ's Harvard interview. They go to New York and hire a black man teen actor, well young man, not very well known. The actor takes AJ's place at the Harvard interview. The admissions interview committee consists of hideously ugly Jews with obvious Jewish names. there is an Alan Dershowitz, a Woody Alan some truly hideous lesbians a Fran Liebowitz look alike.

    The actor has memorized all his statements about "Why I want to go to Harvard and how I plan to change the world when I graduate." The admit committee encourages all this and are overwhelmed with this articulate young black firebrand who promises to be the next Al Sharpton but with an education.

    AJ gets early admission complete with full scholarship, dorm fees book store voucher and speding money.

    THE END

    And no, AJ doesn't flunk out. He will get gentleman's A-s because he's black.

    One would think, having faced affirmative action since the oldest were 22 and the youngest 8, thebaby boomers would recognize reality. But no, they're still stuck in some 1870 bourgeois fantasy that intelligence, hard work, merit and honesty will prevail.

    Replies: @m___

    Nice take, you fully marked the frame.

  • @Alden
    I don't see a thing wrong with White parents lying cheating and bribing to over come the vicious ferociously monitored discrimination against White college applicants.

    Of course given the vicious discrimination against Whites, especially men, Whites would be far better off using that 150,000K + tuition and 80,000 K dorm fees to buy an apartment house in a neighborhood full of immigrants desperate for housing.

    Honestly, honor, morality fair play the law holding to all those goody goody western civilization things has made Whites, rich and poor, intelligent and dumb; helpless in the face of marxist criminality for the lat 60 years.

    Replies: @EliteCommInc., @m___, @Wally

    Escalation is called for. The enemy decided on the tools and the methods. Covert, is obligatory. Meek is cowardice. Never respect someone who did not return your honoring in the first place. As an individual, a family, whether as a group.

    White elites have sold out, it is either being plastered to the bottom or bite and claw. White middle classes have sold out, …time to retract still further into oblivion?

    Whites have been bred for submission, as the supreme quality. Christianity has a hand in this. The times require different tricks out of the bag, they are in there. The Three Musketeers, the Malinois dog, Godefroy de Bouillon, the Jester of Richard the Third.

    Not the Muslim, the Negro, the Latino is the meaningful enemy, it is the own bosom. The cancer within. Jewish mindsets are to learn from, not to whine about. Loyalty to the inside, anything goes to the outside. Principle, loyalty, psychological smarts, rational long term behavior must be grasped in a single sentence. In group prevalence, the healthy zest for adventure.

    Ask yourself, “are the stakes my little misery cocoon, or passing genes into the pool, and thus the future to vouch for”. Of course a White Russian is closer to the hart, then Metropolis Jewish, a Turk that is not one’s personal acquaintance or Muslims anonymous.

    Again you Whites no longer have the power to decide on the rules, rules of Enlightenment and individual rights are burned to the ground, you White Proles and Middle class hangers on, are on the defensive. Action, not whining is being called for. Then show some leniency, when the margin allows, as an expression of art and culture, merit, and principle. Practice different rules with your own, and extrovert into conqueror mode to the outside.

    We do not want to sound like Jordan Peterson, peddling self-help for the masses, but others are hard at work against your interests, and taking you by the nose, around any bend without you realizing. Tricking you into irrelevant crags and pockets, side-stepping, overloads of junk “intelectualism” and “science” is part of it.

  • As most are surely aware, the last year or two has seen a growing crackdown on free speech and free thought across the Internet, with our constitutionally-protected First Amendment rights being circumvented through the agency of monopolistic private sector corporations such as Facebook, Twitter, and Google. Although as yet our government has not gained the...
  • @Budd Dwyer
    @David Martin

    EMJ’s 1200-page TJRS can be found in pdf and djvu formats on Library Genesis and other places on the internet. I ordered his Barren Metal and Slaughter of Our Cities through Amazon. These are relatively mild compared to his other books. If I wanted a book but it was really controversial like the book Ron Unz refers to, I would do everything within my power not to order it or have record of purchasing it. And I’m a nobody without a reputation and high position to worry about.

    Replies: @m___

    EMJ’s 1200-page TJRS can be found in pdf and djvu formats on Library Genesis and other places on the internet. I ordered his Barren Metal and Slaughter of Our Cities through Amazon. These are relatively mild compared to his other books. If I wanted a book but it was really controversial like the book Ron Unz refers to…

    That is the right mindset, the ones who should and can act must stay out of the eye. Now authors not making ends meet, is and can be addressed in other ways, and should as a priority. We wish Ron zero revenue out of Patreon in the same spirit of things.

  • @CanSpeccy
    For the immediate future, the big question is which way will the battle for control of information go?

    Will Google/Facebook/NSA/the Teachers' Federation/the Communists in academic administration/the corporate media and entertainments industry united in support of the Fascist New World Ordure, and yes, the ADL, achieve full-spectrum dominance of information and propaganda, or will the free-speakers keep plugging the memory hole, blowing up Potemkin Villages and spreading forbidden knowledge?

    In America, the right of free speech still theoretically exists. For now, therefore, the battle will continue to be waged by technological means, and during this phase of the struggle there will surely be multiple, even profitable, ways found for the propagation of "banned" information.

    The game seems most likely, however, to end with Chinese-style information tyranny backed by laws, such as the emerging laws against anti-Semitism, anti-racism, "hate speech," Canada's idiotic law to compel the use of PC pronouns, etc., etc., (laws, that is, against anything that impedes the emergence of the Fascist New World Order).

    At that point, the question will be whether Americans and others in the West submit or embark on a civil war.

    Physical resistance to the NWO is, I think, most unlikely, not because of overwhelming Jewish power, but because of the treason of non-Jews, the people with power who have been bought and paid for by the Money Power, Jewish, Gentile, Hindu and Muslim.

    Why are the Western nations so corrupt? Because they have trashed Christianity and now believe in nothing much beyond money, sex and power, which means getting along by going along with whatever the Money Power demands, even if that means genocide of your own people and trashing your own nation.

    Replies: @m___

    Physical resistance to the NWO is, I think, most unlikely, not because of overwhelming Jewish power, but because of the treason of non-Jews, the people with power who have been bought and paid for by the Money Power, Jewish, Gentile, Hindu and Muslim.

    Good proof of concept. Hindu and Muslim will stay “local”, and “flat” fielders. But as understood, the rule of the land by crude escalation of tools, especially and first financial capitalism and the underbelly, sorrowy consumerism has created the conditioning. Lame, no balls all guts underclasses, and shortsighted elites grown out of it. If the morsel is Amazon, that is a crump. The ultimate cocoon is the US, can anyone conceive a world beyond it, here on unz by Unz?

    There is a lot to admire in the Jewish mindset to divert and divest and grope at such a mess. Adapting the tactics of the enemy helps.

  • @Reg Cæsar

    ...the strict limits of a few dozen words surely leave render it much more appropriate for slogans or insults than anything more thoughtful or substantive.
     
    It would be great for aphorisms. I was going to say that GK Chesterton would have fit perfectly, but someone probably has a Chesterton tweet stream going right now.

    And yep, here it is:

    https://twitter.com/GKCdaily

    ...the extensive Nazi-Zionist economic partnership of the 1930s, which laid the basis for the creation of the State of Israel.
     
    It's old news that the early National Socialists were friendly with German Zionists, as they shared the goal of resettling the country's Jews. But it is surprising that this didn't come to a halt once they turned the party over to the psychotic faggot with the mustache. Was it done behind his back?

    Replies: @jacques sheete, @m___, @Wally

    As a rule Jew mongering is on all sides, always, everywhere. One can alter this paradigm in different ways.

    Jew = Jewish thirst for power = moneyed elites thirst for power = innate to power

    Jew = money && political elites = power elites = corrupted, core rotten WASP elites

    Everywhere = global = China = Russia = US = etc.

    There is a hundred more variants to the above ones. We need a clear concise vocabulary to get somewhere. After all the variants as to the variables might be many, but human concepts are rather binary and consist of few variables. Too few often to make sense, but that is because the limits of our “deux chevaux” processor and the echo box of our short term memory.

    Yes, as always bets were placed on the Nazis by all parties, as always is the case, as today in our cherished US, to which we think to be a considered party.

  • @Dieter kief
    Amazon has become much too influential. That needn't be that bothersome, at least as long as free speech reigns. If not, there is a problem. - All ya experts out there: Is there a juridical answer to the problem of Amazon censorship?

    Replies: @m___, @Wizard of Oz

    Is there a juridical answer to the problem of Amazon censorship?

    Not a juridical one, that would be like carrying water to the sea. But yes a systemic one: end basing excellency and admiration into monetizing. Economic theoretics that include Nature and it’s resources, the long term, appreciating progress as to derivatives. Nothing less, or not too much can be done practically.

    We will all wind up vegans, since grass can be pushed to our controlling budgets as expensive as meat. To say, ‘it’ is everywhere, the system is overheating. Our poor elites, have nowhere to go but imagine, plunk their gains in furthering the thickness of the castle walls.

  • @Stan d Mute
    Another masterful entry in Ron Unz’ catalog of public service.

    It’s a pity that the overwhelming majority of sheeple are simply too stupid and/or prosperous/complacent to read and comprehend that everything they have been told is utter bullshit. It’s a terrifyingly minute percentage of our population capable of independent thought and analysis and among them an even smaller number willing to critically analyze cherished beliefs such as religious fairy tales handed down by their parents.

    I become ever more convinced that the only possible way out of this is an existential catastrophe fatal to all who refuse to see what is rather than that they wish to be. And even then, who among us is constitutionally able to admit let alone act accordingly in recognition that his own mother or child or wife is too enfeebled and contemptible to rationally warrant continued support and sustenance? We evolved into our current form via the brutalities of survival versus a Nature intent on our failure. How ironic that our own sentimentalities will undo eons of selective culling and ensure our extinction.

    The meek shall be interred in the earth.

    Replies: @m___, @Ralph B. Seymour, @Beefcake the Mighty

    We evolved into our current form via the brutalities of survival versus a Nature intent on our failure. How ironic that our own sentimentalities will undo eons of selective culling and ensure our extinction.

    Not “entitled” but yes, agree.

    One single layer, let alone a second, one must be an over achieving Ashkenazim to see.

  • @Anon
    This is scary stuff - using Black History month and "white nationalism" as pretexts for banning books critical of the secret police, the ADL. Sneaky, sneaky. Have you perhaps considered contacting the copyright holders of these works and offering to sell PDFs of their works through this website? Maybe a teaser, then $1 per download or something like that? Or maybe even they could make their works public domain and you could offer them electronically.

    Replies: @m___

    …and offering to sell PDFs of their works through this website? Maybe a teaser, then $1 per download or something like that? Or maybe even they could make their works public domain and you could offer them electronically…

    Halt right there, turning a honey trap into real subversion, you Sir interfere with the experiment! Do not confuse having a stake, ambitioning a stake, and plain revolt. It is a delicate mind to muster and fade the limits. If the control knob is left unattended, the “free speech game” gets out of control.

  • @niteranger
    Ron:

    What is happening in publishing with Amazon is the result of the bigger problem: The Jews Control just about everything in America and most of the world. Look what they have done in Britain, France and the rest of Europe. I've said it before and I'll say it again they control the social-economic-politcal pathways or the world. It is almost impossible to do anything in just about any business in publishing, media (including all visual arts), and of course the internet.

    But this isn't new and you should realize it. They owned almost all the book publishers, art labels, and music industry. Most people don't realize that the Godfather Trilogy (as far as I know) was the first mob movie directed by someone other than a Jew! It took that long for them to allow Coppola (and Puzo who wrote the book and the screen play any creative control). They controlled all the print media to the point that even if other writers wrote pieces in magazines and newspapers they almost never got credit. Instead they would put their Jewish friends byline on it. This went on for years and years. They did the same thing in art and photo industry often pumping up their friends and down grading other artists and photographers. The one artist who beat their asses however, was the Pop Icon and creative genius, Andy Warhol. Warhol went around the regular industry pathways and became one of the most famous artist of all time. They couldn't control him. Today I doubt if Warhol could do what he did back then because they have tightened their grip because almost everything goes through the internet.

    The original men's magazine Esquire was almost not named Esquire because one of the founders Arnold Gingrich thought the name sounded too Jewish and they wouldn't be able to attract good writers because of the way the Jews ran the industry of ripping everyone off. The Internet is now controlled by them because they mastered the art networking and if you disagree with them you are out of business whether you are a Congressman, writer or publisher. They control the monetary pathways allowing you to access your money through banks and Paypal, Patreon and so forth. Their final death note to all of us is shown in Amazon which controls most of the publishing and digital distribution. That's right distribution. This is the final nail in our coffin is that they will limit your ability to distribute your book and collect any money. Of course, you can self-publish and print it including digital but you'll lack the infrastructure of Amazon to distribute your book widely and make a lot of money. Google also owned by Jews and of course, Facebook will bury you so no one will find it.

    They will condemn everything as hate speech, antisemitic, and anything else they can call it and all the media will fall in line. You have only one thing left give them competition somehow and pull an Andy Warhol on them and go around them. If someone doesn't then it's over because they are never going to stop!

    Replies: @m___, @Buck Ransom

    An also very informative byte, your Andy Warhol adds to the historical perspective.

    …give them competition somehow and pull an Andy Warhol on them and go around them. If someone doesn’t then it’s over because they are never going to stop!

    And no-one to blame for it, but ourselves. It is plain common sense that creating middle-men, out of intellectual sloppiness, tolerating bottlenecks, not knowing or harnessing knowledgeable and loyal technicians, consumer behavior, not imposing favoritism based on ethics on hardware and software (Free Software Foundation, Stallman, a long time litterate advocate, comes to mind, a Julian Assange), one ends up sitting duck.

    The Jewish led assaults on cornering markets, is not outer worldly. A few simple techniques, mind patterns, secondary loyalties can make one his own proper Jew. Indeed it is a matter of not so much intelligence, but simple consequent behavior as to what the hunting grounds consist of. Out of the cocoon, gather context.

    The subterranean element, the tripled layers of navigation, the bet all sides of the International Jew, is not beyond Goyim comprehension. Enact on it, will take some balls, so drop that “camino de la mas minima resistencia” approach of a common consumer.

    Ron Unz, takes part, the betting all sides is on, the Patreon, the Google analytics, the Word-press, the Cloudflare are by design, not coincidence, nor ignorance. The whining has an explicit goal, dropping of steam in a sterilized manner. The valve of the pressure cooker. That is not how wars are won.

    There are times when you capitalize, these are times for Goyim to invest, rally, rethink loyalties, revision methods, get rid of their, to the core, putrid elites. Excellence by wealth is no excellence at all. Above all combine the public whining with some serious covert action. Measure up to the enemy.

    The Malinois approach.

  • Correction: make that (Louis Farrakhan).

  • Case made, and well.

    There is something innate as to printed books, threading, inter-related research depend on openly available sources, the cluster as a whole. Effectively killing an argument by pulling a source as now done by Amazon is mortal to the whole of the cluster and cluster of authors.

    Now as for Ron, and pointing so outspokenly and knowledgeably to the phenomenon of long term generational effect, how come the lack of discussion on alternative venueways, the adherance and dependency on a Google analytics, Patreon, Cloudflare, WordPress to name a few. Hard to understand but as by design. Louis Farhakan does better.

  • If there is one thing I like about French President Emmanuel Macron, it is his voluntarism. While his presidency necessarily embodies the incoherence and indecision of both the French people and oligarchy – hence the current suboptimal political equilibrium, recognized by all to be highly unsatisfying – Macron as a young globalist evidently has a...
  • @Sollipsist
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Not sure about this. Progress = education = prosperity = decreased fertility. There are no exceptions in history.

    You can certainly question the motives (and I'm sure many will question the potential effectiveness in that region, given previous attempts and various other indicators), but there's really nothing but potential benefits to the entire world from a more educated and consequently less fecund African population.

    Replies: @m___

    It is not that it has not been tried? Do you not agree, you do not have do, now do you.

  • @SunBakedSuburb
    @anonymous

    True monotheism is the recognition of a singular, impersonal universal consciousness to which we all belong. Islam, Christianity, and Judaism all suffer the fatal flaw of creation by man. And with human design comes bias. And with bias comes the ridiculous notion that an energy that can create the universe and complex life forms like human beings is listening to your prayers and choosing your belief system over others. The three religions mentioned above have positive qualities, but they mostly serve as intellectual and spiritual cages.

    Replies: @m___

    Indeed. Giving importance to religion is an intellectual trap institutionalized. It only serves psychological sedition, and deters from rational overview. Ideally to serve it’s purpose as a glue, religion can retain the ritualistic, the musical and tonal binds, the magnanimous Cathedrals and Latin as an antidote to porn and soccer in the Euro minds of us deplorables.

    Elites should steer away from leaning on the above before anything else. Real progress is top inspired and is agnostic to consumerism (the First religion of the day), and the minor other four or five.

  • Macron Calls for “European Renaissance” in Controversial Alt-Right Pivot
    Guillaume Durocher • March 9, 2019 • 2,800 Words

    Great article, infusion of key ideas for a future world. The detour over Macron is granted. Suggested alternative title:

    Inspired thinking of Guillaume Durocher on what a future EU[1] scenario can be.

    [1] Integration into a planetary concept of rule must be worked out urgently, especially seen the time-frame constraints on toxicity, global growing populations, migrations. And on the positive side, AI (big data and the possibilities of curing then sorting, only then dumping on the public policy). the inspiring work on poly-genic reading (a big data challenge for the larger part), and cross-fingers, gene editing, or at least exponential generational jumps in human nature by selective embryo matching. Thus allowing for time travel, and build acceleration into the Universe.[2]

    [2] Guillaume[3] is late on this, and the world of thought of the public ill adapted to the niche public of unz.com. This is an article that will catch lower commenting and reading. It should be archived as a snippet anchored to it’s time of propagation because of it’s core meaningfulness, not word count or comment count.

    [3] Exotic sourcing of Guillaume The Rock is a great mental stimulus for Anglo Americans to realize that Europe can do it’s own thinking.

  • It is pretty much established that although most people have internalised the lessons of the holocaust, Jewish institutions have somehow failed to do so. They have continued to repeat the same mistakes that brought disasters on the Jews and others throughout their history. The universal lessons learned from the Holocaust are based on common sense...
  • @Gilad Atzmon
    @Fran Taubman

    @Fran

    pretty intense duplicitous nonsense on your part... Maimonides was many things but historian wasn't one of them. Guide to the Perplexed isn't an historical text,, it is a rabbinical lame attempt at Aristotelian thinking. (by the way you should give a try to my Guide to the Perplexed, way more juicy and revealing https://www.amazon.com/Guide-Perplexed-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1852428260) ...

    Then you send us to Spinoza. First it is nice that you made Spinoza a Jew cos his contemporary rabbis excommunicated the great man . Yet again Spinoza was many things but historian he wasn't.

    War crimes: I do not argue that Israel invented war crimes or should claim royalties for every genocide in human history (I don't want to give them ideas) . But the crime that is committed in Palestine by Israel is unique on too many levels. It has been more than 7 decades since the Nakba. Israel is a 'democracy' yet Israelis vote time after time to sustain that oppression. There is not one Jewish party in the Knesset that supports Palestinian right of return... on a weekly Israel deploys snipers to kill Palestinian protesters. And those amongst us who bring these facts to light are subject to punishments .... yes this is pretty unusual ...

    If you read the paper once again while concentrating you may find out that it wasn't Heidegger who argued that it is Jews who bring disasters on themselves. It was the early Zionists from Borochov, to Gordon, to Nordau and Herzl...

    Replies: @German_reader, @Fran Taubman, @m___, @alexander

    Israel,

    Serves the purpose, a most intense, contained, urban-warfare, masses-control experiment and the political beyond. France’s attitudes toward the Yellow Vests are inspired by it. Should be allowed for that alone. The Zionist Jews for once serve a purpose beyond their own group interests. From France, over China to Russia, we learn from the US haggling and hick-ups globally and the Israeli stretching the boundaries of decency.

    Baruch Espinoza, marrying science and religion, a lame Pierre Theilhard de Chardin. A glass lense without focus.

    Mayo-mo-nides?, Socra-tes? never heard of him.

  • @Orest Slepokura
    Gilad Atzmon, as usual, offers us intellectual red meat for thought. Regarding the Zionist/Jewish attitude to the Holocaust, I would flag an event that occurred in Jerusalem in April 1976, when the South African Prime Minister John Vorster was invited to Yad Vashem while on an official visit to Israel, where he paid homage to the victims of the Nazi Holocaust. Vorster himself had been interned during WWII as a Nazi sympathizer; a non-issue for his Jewish hosts, including the late Yitzhak Rabin, apparently. That Vorster oversaw an apartheid regime that was officially racist, indeed white supremacist, was also a non-issue. Two months later, after black schoolchildren were slaughtered by South African security forces during a protest in the Soweto Township against the paucity of resources being devoted to their education, inter alia, it did not inhibit the Jewish state from establishing closer economic and military ties with Pretoria. It certainly was not something that spurred the Israeli leadership and their opinion-maker flunkeys to invoke the Nazi Holocaust.

    Replies: @m___, @joeshittheragman

    …an event that occurred in Jerusalem in April 1976, when the South African Prime Minister John Vorster was invited…

    These bits help, you are illustrating and sketching what is power at works, and what progress in the long term is not allowed to do.

    In global society in this early twenty-first century, there is little room for progress that does not collide with power interests.

    Hence planetary rule, to give some lee-way to the elites to experiment and un-cramp their uptight attitudes. Crude prozac of sorts. Creativity needs leisure, play, descaling and multiplying the experiments in social, economical and learning attitudes, the context-ing outside of historical models, re-envisioning established attitudes. Experiments toward quality including global population interference, would then be possible, the newer concepts of non-intrusive biological interactivity with human nature, using big data blobs for meaningful output, curating stale ideas. Turn away from the masses, they seem not to be the most urgent matter. The local in power and the quest for it, is dead anyhow. Theoretical stances, small contained experiments, have real science enact on real life, local experiments to decide global attitudes.

    So yes, not power, but progress, and multiplying new mistakes, so much easier contained as our times allow, augmented speed and accuracy of decision without the derivatives of repeated and up-scaled same mistakes would be it.

    One single suggestion comes to mind, let in and allow outliers into the educational process, into the machinations of billy-o-nairing, and into establishment, into the world of ideas. Not so much a free flow of capital, but a pulling in of wasted cognitive talent, unconventional thinking, and allow it to build momentum is suppressed. Not crowd control, not educating the masses, but the quest for understanding and progress would give humanity a new outlook and “many new mistakes”, “experimental” progress.

    The basing into personal wealth beyond a certain point, and the few brain-dead venue-ways to acquire and cement personal wealth paralyses human society. There is only a few venue-ways to acquire ego and monetized success that is to capitalize on nature, on the growing global sludge classes of disoriented humans, and that corrupted as an important factor what our elites look and feel like. We can say they are repeating the same mistakes, in a spin of repeated fear-induced, cramped ruling. The death of creativity, an epoch of Jewish mindsets for short-term power.

  • Adapted from the latest Radio Derb, availableexclusively on VDARE.com Adding to the stock of public merriment this week was Ilhan Omar, the dimwitted Democrat Representative from Minnesota's 5th District. Ms. Omar has been rather free with remarks about how Jews are too fond of money, use their money for disproportionate influence in our politics, have...
  • @Hail
    @Charles_Martel


    Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar ripped former President Barack Obama in an interview published Friday, belittling his “pretty face” and saying his agenda of hope and change was an illusion.
     
    I wouldn't have used "pretty face," but the comment is accurate.

    I'd have said something like "well-spoken, nonthreatening, movie-president-seeming, quasi-exotic Black man." The first Affirmative Action President.

    Of course, the same is true of Ilhan Omar herself. A rather dull and shrill White version of this person would be in some Twitter echochamber-ghetto for eternity. Ilhan Omar was promoted to U.S. Congressperson solely because of her race and not her ideas, accomplishments, or talents.

    Replies: @m___

    Indeed, society goes in layers, she is a consumer product. She is level Starbucks.

  • From Trends, search volume in the US for "hate speech" as a percentage of search volume for "free speech" by year: Extrapolating from 2014 through to the present, a fourth slogan will roll out around 2030: Free speech is hate speech. Dragonfly isn't dead, it has just been hidden underground. Intellectual totalitarianism is scaling and...
  • @Achmed E. Newman
    What makes you so sure of what writers the readers on unz read, and what the overlap is, M? From this bit of nonsense:

    The top of our system, the systemics, hopelessly exempt of rational, the under-layers of global society, the population base hopelessly incapacitated for the outliers there is but one thing to do. [sic - WTF?!]
     
    I'm getting the idea that you ought to read more and write less.

    Replies: @m___

    …The top of our system, the systemics, hopelessly exempt of rational, the under-layers of global society, the population base hopelessly incapacitated, for the outliers, there is but one thing to do.

    [sic – WTF?!]

    You made us see the light, please annul my brokerage.

  • On the article, the suppression of free speech, and the force feeding of trash information,

    On Stan d Mute’s comment to the article

    For any who haven’t seen this, we were warned.

    Stan, indeed the short mind-burst meant for broad consumption says it all.

    Time having done it’s thing, the Sovjet Block, must be replaced with the single global enemy. “The system”, regardless, Chinese, US, EU, Russia, there is nothing new there or here. The obvious is being ignored. There is no sustainability in the global system left. It’s shelf life has expired. There is also no longer a local on the ruling level anywhere on the Planet.

    Time having played it’s usual tricks, social media and all, the variable of what was accounted for in the short clip’s covert suggestion, the ignorance of “Americans” included the masses and middle classes, and of course not one but multi generational elites by now, bred for lying about, not balls and brains.

    The Malinois dog breed does give us a better example of what that can mean. So taking in the time factor extend “American” to Global Society and we are updating the thorough hindsight of the individual on the clip.
    On top, it is underwritten by the interviewer in a timeless fashion: “So what must we do?”

    As if the explanation is not self-evident. Well it is not.

    And now we get back to our cherished columns, pieces, and other knitting here on unz.com. No the message of the clip is not understood. And worse if it would be understood, and stand up to time, it is such a psychological draw that most of our doggies do not have the stamina regardless of the mind-power to stand up to it.

    An example, associative thinking, holding bits of information, catalogue them, and building new associations on top as things come (“news”, novel articles, streaming in), discarding bends and flaws is above the fray here.

    It is never that here on Unz readers “jump” the comment column of an explicit article and bring it in obvious correlation with another. What Shamir says, then Karlin, then Sailer, a Paul Craig Roberts is contained within the mind – moment of the comments. So no base knowledge is built, anything goes. That underwrites the essential point: there is but contempt for you reader, and you deserve it. What’s more, most of the content producers, are as far from an essential grasp of things as their readers. Their thing is “writing”, recycling words and go on at infinity. The artesan at work.

    Ron Unz, a level up knows this, so indeed the matching controversial viewpoints within the same pages, no necessity in recalling unproven viewpoints, bends into every corner, verbose hooks into everything, linear dissertations into nowhere is a “smart” juggling, psychological truth.

    Ron lives for page-views, reader base. And it works sublimely, …as long as the reader base, be it a niche is below a certain level of comprehension. The strategy can be easily extended into the political arena, business, technology incorporated. And for that they should, there is no gratitude in “educating” the masses, the processing power is simply not there. One cannot put a key into a door that has no matching keyhole. Sex is based on the same principle.

    The top of our system, the systemics, hopelessly exempt of rational, the under-layers of global society, the population base hopelessly incapacitated, for the outliers, there is but one thing to do.

    Lay back in comfort or burden, relax, and if possible enjoy. All layers of society of planet Earth are affected, and that makes for civilizational severe mutilation, systemic change. Coming and coming soon.

  • It is pretty much established that although most people have internalised the lessons of the holocaust, Jewish institutions have somehow failed to do so. They have continued to repeat the same mistakes that brought disasters on the Jews and others throughout their history. The universal lessons learned from the Holocaust are based on common sense...
  • Why Do Some People Keep Repeating the Same Mistakes?
    Gilad Atzmon • March 7, 2019 • 1,900 Words • 25 Comments •

    An antidote to below article of yesterday. And as the quantity and quality of the comments will probably prove, as Ron Unz likes betting numbers rather then quality and lesser popularity, the contradiction will spell the essentials of unz.com. Controversy sells. And in the case of Shamir (yesterday), it does not have to go very deep.

    Where Is That Vaunted White IQ?
    Israel Shamir • March 7, 2019 • 1,800 Words • 216 Comments •

    Crowd control, a Jewish culinary specialty, who can blame them, as long as the bigger group, ruled on elite principles, exclusivity, chosen-ness by means of financial rape, has sold out to a far more consequent ideology and Jewish technical mastery honed historically. The homogeneity of White is not. The White elites despise their own, and financial capitalism allows for it in an exponential way over the timeline of recent human history. Submissiveness that is what Whites are bred for, unlike the Jewish middle class with regards as to the outside of their group.

    If the Jewish mindset would focus on hard work as in producing and sustaining a life in the Hertzl spirits, they would go the way of the Muslims, the White proles, African and Latino descend “minorities”.

    This last suggestion is not a matter of preference but survival for the Jewish middle class. Israel today is rather in a dangerous position, from lure to bait in a whiff is always present. The Jews will have to keep scrambling, the White elites can no longer turn their backs to them, from what it seems. Globally there has been created an enormous distance between the crowds, the most, and the mastery of control of the few.

    The battle of real minds will do.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    @m___

    "Controversy sells."

    -- For the authors and commenters on Unz Review, an insult from likes of "m___ " is a badge of honor.

    And who are your favorite real minds to do the battle? The "thinkers" at the ADL? The "minds" at Atlantic Council (affiliated with Integrity initiative)? The Kagans clan of overweight war mongers and other moral midgets of Krystol and Pletka kind? -- Thanks but no thanks.
    https://steigan.no/2019/01/how-integrity-initiative-and-atlantic-council-is-exposed-in-norway/

    btw, how is the Kagans' neo-Nazi project doing in Ukraine?

  • Whites have a stellar IQ compared to Blacks; this is an idea one often encounters in the writing of my esteemed colleagues on Unz.com. But when the country, the USA, was in dire need, the only person who dared to step forward into the line of fire was not a smart white guy, but a...
  • @Franklin Ryckaert
    Where is that vaunted IQ of Israel Shamir for not understanding that intelligence and courage are two different things ?

    And where is that vaunted IQ of Israel Shamir for not understanding that the existence of "Judeo-Capitalism" does not negate the history of Judeo-Communism for which there is abundant proof?

    And where is Israel Shamir's integrity for denying the Jewish role in the crimes of Communism and the Jewish role in 9/11 and most (if not all) false flags since then ?

    Replies: @m___

    Betting all and every side, is Shamir as well as media-middle-class Jewish. The methods of bread writing are applied as ever. Some do it with less sophistication as Saker, then some manage to extrapolate the close personal responsibility as Karlin, putting the blame in the graphs.

    Keeping the entropy going, is what counts, so one can surf another “issue” in the morrow. These methods of proceeding are well known, …and do work, not so much to blame as to the smartness of the authors, it is fairly easy to appropriate the concept, Ron Unz does it in an exponential way, but because of the sheer dumbness of the crows, the niche groups of the cloud included.

    It is also well known that society progresses in a hick-up way, small considerable changes unexpectedly consequence of very few individuals and concentration of energy (work).

    But power is the rule of short term smartness, the whole of the elites and all of the energy of the middle classes is directed towards that goal. Nothing else matters but to crow on a pile of dung regardless.

  • Whites have a stellar IQ compared to Blacks; this is an idea one often encounters in the writing of my esteemed colleagues on Unz.com. But when the country, the USA, was in dire need, the only person who dared to step forward into the line of fire was not a smart white guy, but a brave black woman, Ilhan Omar.

    >> Quatsch << at work. Individuals in the public domain are exploited from behind the scene. They can bask in the sunlight, to be discarded as any consumer object duly should. Behind the scenes one bets all sides, it is clear that the substantiated sum of peoples is a liability to the elites, and to be imploded onto itself.

    How to read the rest of the binary? Well Malinois dogs could be an inspiration to the Western descend Europeans with ambitions other then the next corner in the road. Seventy percent breeding, and sorting of what is left to one in ten is a good start. Brains and balls and both essential, show pretty examples over history. Non intrusive sorting of embryos, further and better genetical analysis and later editing. "artificial intelligence", for now sorting out of data that matter, will denounce and the Jew mindset, and the primitive breeding for quantity, but not the viewpoints that we recognize as Enlightenment, courage, longer term ambitions and goals, inclusiveness on the lowest level, the individual. Some of them Whites and Jews of the better ones of that nature.

    Above ream of values was betrayed by White elites, and forgivably never understood by the ninety nine percent, including such ponies as Shamir and Ilhan Omar, all that is political posing, and mind-shaping of the short term variety. Quality wise comparable to soft-porn.

    Israel took to the bone, but Shamir, running circles is not the goal. Our society is in need for reshaping or disruption and cramping. Is that one too far for you? Is it not that late in life, it should matter less, how your personal ambitions compare to general well-being of the planet. Your testament will it be a base message as the above?

  • In 2008, from the War Nerd: Naturally Somalis go for that Islamic noise, because compared to the basic Somali ideology, which is “Every man for himself and eat the losers” Islamic law is bleeding-heart liberalism. It’s kind of funny, imagining Somalis begging the mullahs, “Please institute Sharia law! We’re ready for that soft, easygoing hippie...
  • @Almost Missouri
    This is something I've tried explaining to moderns: in its original spreading, Islam was usually the more civilized alternative. As the WN says, making robbery punishable by amputation, limiting war booty to four brides*, treating all Muslims—not just clan members—as brothers, etc., these were mercies compared to what went before.

    Coincidentally, Islam spread rapidly from its cradle in the nomad-heavy Arabian Peninsula until it ran up against other civilizations that already had functioning laws/customs for the above things. And even then, if those other civilizations had become decadent/dysfunctional, Islam quickly scarfed up the place: e.g., Egypt, North Africa, fratricidal Visigothic Iberia. A society need not have been advanced to resist the Islamic Borg assimilation, just modestly functional. Even the primitive Merovingians were able to break the Islamic wave at Tours. Strangely, the Merovingians' descendants, the modern European Union seems not able to duplicate this elementary feat...

    *I note that in anthropological studies of all-out warfare, e.g., rainforest cannibals or the Eastern Front in WWII, they typically find that 30%-40% or so of the men are killed and a like portion permanently maimed/incapacitated, so the four-women-per-(surviving)-man rule is not arbitrary. It reduces concubinage in violent societies through partial enfranchisement. Also in US ghettos. There are reasons that Louis Farrakhan and Nation of Islam have done well here.

    Replies: @m___, @Jimi, @Colin Wright, @Counterinsurgency, @Spangel, @Alden

    Best explanation, to the point. These elements must play for and against Islam. The context playing an important role.

    What about the Balkan, part of it, why is Turkish Islam pushed aside by generational Muslims, the younger generations, for a cruder, better sponsored Saudi Arabia one. How come they do not adapt the more then one woman part. Is fashion at play, the consumer environment, and it the more important part of today’s religious attractions mostly identity politics. Belonging.

  • "Politics stops at the water's edge" was a tradition that, not so long ago, was observed by both parties, particularly when a president was abroad, speaking for the nation. The tradition was enunciated by Sen. Arthur Vandenberg of Michigan in 1947, as many of the Republicans in the 80th Congress moved to back Truman's leadership...
  • @peter mcloughlin
    A great nation has three phases: it rises and gains power; then it has to retain that power; when power is on the wane it tries to regain it. That seems to be the pattern of history. https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/
    It is hard to see what stage a nation is in at any given point because fortunes oscillate. Only with the long-range view of history can we be certain. But if a great nation is divided among itself that division spreads beyond its own borders. If, as Pat Buchanan asks, the American Century is over, the next question is: who does this century belong to? The struggle for that title will doom us all. Those powers seeking to gain should not gloat. The world is already in a state of entropy, never a good sign for the hopes of world peace.

    Replies: @m___

    …the next question is: who does this century belong to? The struggle for that title will doom us all. Those powers seeking to gain should not gloat. The world is already in a state of entropy

    Who will crow on a pile of dung. If solutions are meant, a planetary at the least, goal should be set by coordinated world governance, not based on the principles of what we understand by globalism at hoc, today.

    That is about as possible as setting a precise time-line for soft boiled eggs at breakfast. The time it is a quarrel, the mind it is a mush. And that’s on a Sunday morning.

  • At the end of November, I noted the remarkable increase in the readership of our webzine over the last couple of years, especially when compared with that of its competitors, both in the alternative and the more establishment opinion media. Three months later, I'm now pleased to say that these trends seem to have continued...
  • @Michael Hoffman
    On Feb. 17 at the United Center in Chicago, before a cheering crowd of black Muslims numbered in the thousands — and who knows how many viewing around the world via webcast — this writer lauded the Nation of Islam’s three volume "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews" as “magisterial revisionist history.”

    Nine days later, on February 26, after having been offered for sale on Amazon for several years, these three books were suddenly banned for "violating content guidelines,” an apparent euphemism for offending the Holy People. Coincidence?

    Until such time as alternatives to Amazon (and independent libertarian platforms for podcasting) are created, the Tech Tyranny, as Mr. Unz indicates, will march on amid the stark media silence on censorship of history books which Zionists and Talmudists detest. This is indeed a sinister Orwellian state of affairs. Public exposure of the book-banning and the hypocrisy that informs it, is essential.

    Jeff Bezos, who founded and owns a controlling stake in Amazon, also owns the Washington Post whose motto, flaunted in a virtue-signaling 2019 Superbowl commercial, is “Democracy Dies in Darkness” — the same darkness in which the Nation of Islam's history of Judaic control of the black slave trade in the western hemisphere, has been consigned.

    Replies: @Henry's Cat, @m___

    Orwellian

    At unz.com we like Orwellian, that is why we “do” Patreon. And CloudFlare, and outsourced statistics analysis.

  • @John Achterhof
    This remarkable divergence in trend is a credit to the quality of work put in here day in and day out. Sailer, Karlin, Reed, Giraldi, Durocher, Mercer, Buchanan, Derbyshire, Dinh.....in my judgement Unz has assembled here the most formidable, awe-inspiring lineup that the world has seen since the 1927 Yankees. Truly an embarrassment of riches, and all the more remarkable in that Ron has done it on a shoestring budget.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5RWv0ghDXE&t=9s

    Replies: @gsjackson, @m___

    Saker up front, and Shamir in a wheelchair to the left.

  • @Len
    I'm amazed you're allowed to run a campaign on Patreon. How'd that happen?

    Replies: @m___

    I’m amazed you’re allowed to run a campaign on Patreon. How’d that happen?

    That’s to be reverse engineered by schmoozing only.

    Another one? Karlin is posted as the successor in waiting of Ron. Hold on to your wits!

  • @Eric Zuesse
    It's a pity, Ron, that your present article describes your site as "a publication providing a convenient home to both the Alt-Left and the Alt-Right, joint access to ideological extremists, conspiracy theorists, racialists, historical revisionists, and other miscellaneous malcontents" instead of as having higher quality-standards than those less-successful sites do, but that's sadly an accurate description of your site. At least you were honest there. And you also are honest about the description you provided here of your writers -- not as higher quality or as more truthful and having at each contentious allegation a link to top quality documentation, but instead as "the angry flapping of our contributing writers."

    I think that your success is actually mainly the result of your software (which I've not seen used anywhere else) for reader-comments. It is simply the best anywhere; and, if you created it, then that's a strong credit to you as a programmer. It is too bad that you as an editorial gateway -- as a submissions-editor -- are not good, and thus now totally ban me as a writer, simply because I am disgusted at your site's orientation favoring various bigotries (which constitute a large portion of "the angry flapping of our contributing writers") and your site's indiscriminateness as regards the quality of what you publish (some of which is good but much of which is bad or even very poor).

    I would regularly read your site if it didn't include so much trash -- and by that I refer not to things that I disagree with but things that simply aren't true, and a great deal that's poorly reasoned and that includes lots of unexamined assumptions. Your site isn't written for open-minded intelligent people but instead for people who simply are attracted to "the angry flapping of our contributing writers."

    Replies: @David, @Anonymous, @SND, @atlantis_dweller, @jacques sheete, @Anatoly Karlin, @ThreeCranes, @Erebus, @Wally, @Antiwar7, @m___

    It’s a pity, Ron, that your present article describes your site as “a publication providing a convenient home to both the Alt-Left and the Alt-Right, joint access to ideological extremists, conspiracy theorists, racialists, historical revisionists, and other miscellaneous malcontents” instead of as having higher quality-standards than those less-successful sites do, but that’s sadly an accurate description of your site. At least you were honest there.

    Indeed, the tining and texture, the content management, the php coding for style, meritorious.
    The functionality of the comments and the possibilities for the backend to mine data notorious.
    Nothing original but well done, and shoestring Ron only knows how much man-hours of tweaks that takes.
    StackExchange, Github, Fecesbook, Twitter, Google all know that part of the game well.
    The applicancy of method and understanding of data mining is meant to be a compliment for a “one-man” operation.
    Strategically analysing what associative methods are possible makes Ron a mind to recon with.
    Sadly the Jew mindset kicks in, put smart analytics into dumb systemics …and wake up in the middle of New York or Brussels.
    Politicians, lobby-ists, bread-writers, media queens of a single night, dark suit mafia types.

    [MORE]

    Content, goal defining, philosophical and scientific appliance, clear vocabulary, not for a dime. Our question repeated, first time posited a year ago. What is the idea and goal behind unz.com? Who finances, why do content loaded writers, not occasionally appear. The answer insofar is audience rallying, call it anything else if you please. This single of all scenarios of course makes for “only numbers” count.

    It amounts to ruling on top of a pile of dung, rather then to coax original elaboration, much contrary to the numbers game. If the content carries a load, the writers are supposed to be thinkers and operatives first, writing, the expression and sharing of ideas. A Wikileaks conceptual of allowing anonymous(real anonymous) sources in, cannot be missing then. A horizon that Ron sadly featured out. Encryption, proxy manipulation, hard-ware requirements, no sub-contracting, hashes, block-chain?, electronic alternative value transfers, a subterranean organization, and a shouting match if you please layered on top come to mind. That is where talent should be vested.

    The case is not to be made for above, no publication that collars itself to regular and audience pleasing publishing is most probably feasible. Stucture is the sociological expression of the restricted human mind.
    No bread-writers would mean drooling numbers of readers and commenters. A Jewish con job, a rag, the old-time movie “The Sting” with Robby Redford come to mind. We are one step away from the Sopranos and their mind-farts. Under the hood, the whole of the systemics look boringly conventional, a ream of Jews tuning into the crowds.

    Your site isn’t written for open-minded intelligent people but instead for people who simply are attracted to “the angry flapping of our contributing writers.”

    Might we add, and an audience, choking on the even worse dredge of mass media, being given a sense of belonging and participating (“commenting”, karaoke) in the linear threads to nowhere.

    It is a sign of human social traits that such a trivet can flourish, as it did in other forms in other periods.
    Will it last a while, we do think so, will it break down, obligatorily, it will not survive a generational change in readership as an example.

    Congrats to Ron, such a mind, and at the service of such a miserable cause.

  • In the good old days when the terms Left and Right meant something the distinction between the two was clear. The Left believed that the resources and wealth of the state ought to be shared equitably. The Right’s position was that since only a few people in society are capable of handling capital properly, transforming...
  • Ex nihilo, historical models are dead by altering contexts.

    The most meaningful utterance in a “decade” on unz.com. More of this, there must be a public for in depth and well defined vocabularies. A book’s worth.

  • Honestly, the inequality gap in America should stagger the imagination or, on second thought, maybe it shouldn’t, not with the first billionaire in the White House and at least two more threatening to join him in a run for the presidency in 2020. After all, we now live on the planet of the billionaires. In...
  • On Engelhardt, his “dispatches”.

    …Are a verbal IQ test. Needed is a 100 points, nausea kicks in at a 107, that’s the market’s low end at unz.com when defined vertically, at least the part Unz cares about. Engelhardt must be brick headed to dram on into eternity. Nomi, why not try childrens’ novels?

    Our question and answer, “Why is what is who pays for it?”. Ask Greenwalt Glenn about coziness.

  • To give a flat binary some texture. What about throwing Bernie, Warren, Trump, Davos, socialism, into a single dumbster, and you our blossomy Nomi, sitting on top, to keep them from breathing.

    A picturesque world you are painting Mevrouw, wonder who pays you for such shortsightedness. Your views are what main street is paved of. Bowing to a crowd of ignorants must make you the smarter one. Your silence on banking matters is well appreciated.

  • It is very unlikely that even if I continue my blog for decades, it will ever have the impact of Stephen Jay Gould’s (1981) “The mis-measure of Man”. It was a best seller, cited in the academic literature over 10,000 times, and even 445 times in 2017 alone. It continues to meet an audience need....
  • @prime noticer
    of course he got it wrong. deliberately, on purpose. it was never a good faith argument to begin with.

    (gould). always check. never don't check.

    Replies: @Pat Boyle, @m___

    Indeed, in the view of general human nature, the cesspool of current society, Gould was a winner.

    One single book and consolidating the derivative of personal wealth and ego. Could as well have written the Koran, single-handedly, and glorified Muslim civilization, or Harry Potter.

    A winner is someone with disregard for the longer term, the extended context, the lack of ethics, in our current social system. Some-one who rules on crap, not unlike our current billionaire class. He wins. The up-vote done by democratic dumb-sters, the next time, my time, middle class crows.

  • Last year’s summary: Russian Demographics in 2018 [2016; 2014]. Preliminary data for 2018 is in. Births, deaths, and natural increase in Russia, 1946-2018. There were about 1,599,316 (10.9/1,000) births in 2018, a decline of 5.4% relative to the 1,689,884 (11.5/1,000) births in 2017. There were about 1,817,710 (12.4/1,000) deaths in 2018, a decline of 0.4%...
  • @AaronB
    @Beckow

    I mostly agree with your comment, except that I think there really is an enormous motivation differential between Jews and whites.

    I don't believe you can pick ethnic nepotism as a tactic. That kind of thing goes very deep into ones world view. And it goes along with a whole value sysrem. If you practice ethnic nepotism, you will get a bunch of other things with it. Or at least, you can't get it alone.

    There are "value bundles" that go together - high motivation, ethnic nepotism, and optimism are a bundle. Notice they are all emotion based. They are part of what the Greeks called the thymotic part of man. Not the intellect. Notice all the highly motivated groups like Asians and Jews are also ethnically cohesive.

    The Western value bundle would be - individualism, rationalism, low motivation, disconnected from emotion, fatalism.

    Individualism, for instance, cannot be separated from rationalism. It only makes sense rationally but is emotionally against human nature. Individualism is a triumph of reason.

    Notice the main difference is that healthy groups have not adopted rationality as their only standard. They remain motivated by entirely irrational factors. And they use reason as a tool.

    As for Jews being a contributing factor, I agree with that. But the main factors are the changes in European culture that created modernity.

    It doesn't make sense to focus on a contributing factor but leave the main factor unaddressed. Moreover, under the regime of Enlightenment rationalism you will never convince people to blame the Jews. The first thing the Enlightenment did almost was emancipate the Jews. According to the Enlightenment, people are abstract entities that are interchangeable and operate rationally.

    Replies: @Beckow, @m___

    Very well exposed. To put it along other lines: White values: conceptual-ism, the individual. Resulting in progress minus derivatives. The one step ahead in the long term.

    The two steps backwards. Ethnic centricities and their culprits, most other ethnic groups at large, collectivism based on relative arguments (who rules (on a pile of shit or a civil marvel being no issue), practicality, the short term.

    The biggest excesses of White civilization: elitism inside the larger collective, turning into elites of own stock selling out. The lack of individual exceptionals, their strength, as compared to the collective stress of other groups. Quality versus numbers.

    To carry this one step ahead, for what it may be worth, turning breeding into a White man’s tool, religion solutioning what rational thinking cannot solve, a dead end. Nature is on the White rational individual’s side.

    From the hip, late as always.

  • Many people I talk to seem to think American foreign policy has something to do with democracy, human rights, national security, or maybe terrorism or freedom, or niceness, or something. It is a curious belief, Washington being interested in all of them. Other people are simply puzzled, seeing no pattern in America’s international behavior. Really,...
  • The Empire: Now or Never

    ??? Rodeo drive. —America is on the defensive, it sheds assets, the dollar, less volume in transactions, less possibilities to cook the books. It’s population’s interests, thus it’s territory. The phalanx of Praetorians is a mercenary fraction.

    Reed, Fred we presume, should set his arguments straight. Are population, consumption, growth economics, military capitalism imposed by not being able to control the accounting of the global commercial fluxes assets or liabilities. One or the other, or both at the same time, according to the context of the rant? Then with some variables well defined, maybe speculate on any outcome.

    This theological piece was only bested by M. T. Klare’s, an Engelhardt copy paste on military tectonics this same week in our beloved colums catering to the most of the many. Glut sells.

  • My first question is about you personally. There is a Wikipedia entry under your name ( ) but since Wikipedia is, at best, a hit-and-miss kind of source, what could you tell our readers about yourself which they ought to know before we turn to the issue of the current situation in Venezuela? I was...
  • @J. Gutierrez
    @joe webb

    Why don't you worry about fixing the bullshit you have at home dip-shit! I guess being the world's top producer o porn, consumer of drugs and largest prisoners incarcerated makes you the example of a successful democratic society. The US has more Socialists programs in place than most Socialists Countries. And your government wipes the Zionist milk off their face with your constitution Trumpster! If socialism is as bad as Trump says, why does he not just them crumble under the weight of the system? Why are Sanctions and Embargos needed? The US wouldn't last one week before collapsing if targeted with the same type of economic warfare. 21 trillion dollars in debt and you think that your system is better? And that's without sanctions dummy!

    Replies: @m___, @Wally

    orry about fixing the bullshit you have at home dip-shit! I guess being the world’s top producer o porn, consumer of drugs and largest prisoners incarcerated makes you the example of a successful democratic society. The US has more Socialists programs in place than most Socialists Countries. And your government wipes the Zionist milk off their face with your constitution Trumpster! If socialism is as bad as Trump says, why does he not just them crumble under the weight of

    Clear angle, and it shows, your viewpoint is exquisite. The US, instead of giving up on it’s territory? (immigration and all), say, has given up on ninety nine percent of it’s population. The Central Bank, doing a “refresh” every single month, between “re-installs” takes care of that. Washington must run a Windows XXX system.

    It is indeed amazing, that the sensitivity of the population is so dulled that even the best of outliers has given up on them.

  • @peterAUS
    I am sure that minority here, old enough to remember good old days of Cold War and Communist regimes in power , will, with ease, recognize the style and lingo of this piece of prop...I mean, information.
    It's crude, and heavy editing is simply grating.
    As:

    Henceforth, the continuous coup d’état promoted by the supremacist-racist-xenophobic and war-mongering government of Donald Trump that aims to impose a governing puppet and the threats of a military invasion in our homeland, which are part of the above-described context.
     
    "Henceforth", "supremacist-racist-xenophobic and war-mongering government", and the best, "above-described context".........."Above", in face to face conversation? Oh man.

    Feels as Saker's inside joke.

    Replies: @bluedog, @Tusk, @Rabbitnexus, @Miggle, @ploni almoni, @jacques sheete, @padre, @m___

    “Henceforth”, “supremacist-racist-xenophobic and war-mongering government”, and the best, “above-described context”……….”Above”, in face to face conversation? Oh man.

    Some Latino-Spanish indeed. Not your average doodle.

  • @sarz
    The gold backed crypto currencies of Iran and Venezuela seem to be non-starters. One would expect that any agency that allowed free trade in these cryptocurrencies would be sanctioned. So how would, say, people in Europe go about buying or selling these cryptocurrencies?

    Bitcoin is probably an NSA creation with no anonymity and subject to manipulation. So that is not a safe solution, though a highly publicised recent trade worth USD7000 between Argentina and Uruguay was designed to encourage Bitcoin settlement.

    I wonder why Russia and China are not using some of their large gold reserves to promote gold trade notes as an alternative to dollar settlement. Only the People's Bank of China has the heft to resist US sanctions. A blockchain based tradeable receipt to a numbered standard piece of gold in a set of depositories in major cities of the world would provide the basis for a much more efficient trade settlement system than the dollar based one, and free of sanctions. The depositories could be run by the Shanghai gold exchange, with substantial deposits of part of their gold reserves by China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, India and other participating countries.

    Countries such as India would be well advised to take back their gold reserves parked with the Bank of England for ease of settlement. The Bank of England is already defaulting on deposited gold, notably with Venezuela.

    I wonder what is keeping China from taking the lead with an alternative to dollar based trade when China's strategic partners Iran and Venezuela are struggling with sanctions.

    Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert, @m___

    …itcoin is probably an NSA creation with no anonymity and subject to manipulation. So that is not a safe solution, though a highly publicised recent trade worth USD7000 between Arg…

    Weak notion.

    I wonder what is keeping China from taking the lead with an alternative to dollar based trade when China’s strategic partners Iran and Venezuela are struggling with sanctions.

    The outright better point to make.

    Soft answer: insecure China, they reluct from taking the lead, knowing they are not offering any new take on capitalism. It is all about the long term for China, the last man alive, after the last man standing is done. The ignorance of the Empire, is compensated by the lack of physical courage, justified that, by intellectual assurance that harder and faster is closer to the abyss. Creepy Chinese, headstrong morons on the US side.

    As to the article, format and content meet. The interviewee seen his position cannot offer a glimpse of the innards, wonder he has any himself. The solicitor, has only words to wield. It is indeed a parody of analysis, a jest on journalism.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
    @m___

    Pretty much.

  • Philanthropy is a fine thing. A good sum of money put in the right place can benefit many people. Commerce is also a fine thing. A small sum of money put in the right place can create goods and services which people want, which can lead to profit which leads to more money being available...
  • @Sean

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffreydorfman/2017/08/13/the-biggest-and-best-tax-break-of-all-time/#c8044f2b23fb

    Most of his wealth came not from his salary, but from the Microsoft stock that he owns, equal to about 10% of the company’s outstanding shares. Wealth gained from stock price appreciation is not taxable until you sell the shares. By holding most of his shares since the company’s founding, Mr. Gates delayed paying tax on those capital gains. By donating the shares to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, that wealth will never be taxed.

    Thus, the fact that capital gains are not taxed as long as the asset is held (and, in real estate, not even when sold if the proceeds are reinvested in a “like” asset) and the existence of the charitable donation tax deduction have provided Bill Gates with what might be called the biggest tax break in history. The federal government likely lost out on $15-20 billion. Even for the federal government that is real money, enough to, for example, run the State Department for about a year.
     

    Replies: @m___, @Endgame Napoleon, @Aft

    The matter of a corrupt system, is the matter. It is not even a Gates thing, it is also a Clinton thing, an everybody but Trump thing (too archaic an oligarch?, or did we miss something). It is not even the matter of applying means to real issues. Whether State Department, or NASA, or EU, UN, The Arab Emirates, Israel, anything thrives on the shale gas principle. Most of the world population is versed into the relative riches of some despicable “elites”.

    History has a history of above, today, never more then ever. A laugh, both sides of the coin are flat. Our precious crowds do not grasp their redundancy, the middle class, free range coop chickens of a global farm, …could it be that our elites are drowning?

    Not because of spoils, but derivatives of the dregs for spoils. It looks like they are pushing against barriers as population, migration, toxicity, obsoleteness of war, financial capitalism having to turn into medieval military drumming.

    Gates is a softy, the Clintons, another Billy, and his type (nothing personal) are the more dangerous mercenaries.

  • @SafeNow
    “Bill Gates is a practical man.”

    Not in all respects. Consider the Gates $1,000 toilet for the rural third world, which even the NY Times considered impractical and indeed preposterous. Bill Gates knows not to set up a job fair across the street from DMV, but when it comes to helping the Third World, he has a blind spot.

    Replies: @Dieter Kief, @m___, @Reuben Kaspate

    …when it comes to helping the Third World, he has a blind spot.

    We deplorables might have.

    What are Foundations for? Consolidating private fortunes? What stands the Middle East and Africa for? No accountability? Legitimate system, “legitimate” scopes, different rules for the corny elites of a corrupt system, allowing for corrupted spoils. Oiliocracy, farmacology, oligarchy, idiocracy is given birth here, times and again. The phenomenon sustains a middle class of consultants, politicians, encrusted molusks of the societal tissue, and that is why they keep numb. Of course half a cent on the dollar might touch the dusty soil of the outer space continent of Africa.

    As most of us, Bill has base close to home concerns, the rest is sub-contracted. Nothing fancy. No principle involved. Distinction comes by fractions of a billion.

  • @TheJester

    Selecting your students has more impact than selecting your teachers.
     
    A personal experience that supports your thesis ...

    I once chaperoned an outing for a class from a Gifted Children's Program in a public school system. It was 5th Grade as I recall. The opportunity arose because our eldest son was selected for the program. He was not "gifted"; rather, he was chosen because the program wanted the "gifted" children to rub elbows with high-achieving students who did not have their intelligence but also would not hold them back.

    The demeanor, intelligence, and intellectual curiosity of the "gifted" students shocked me! It was clear that I was in the presence of a group of children who had exceptionally high IQs. I have also taught at three major universities. What a pleasure it would have been to have taught a class of intellectually "gifted" students. It would have completely changed the atmosphere and dynamics in the classroom.

    This, unfortunately, was a one-off experience. I never repeated the experience of seeing the special dynamic of a group of exceptionally high IQ people in one place at one time in spite of decades dealing at the higher reaches of government, the military, and defense-related high-tech industries.

    Replies: @m___

    Amazing how talent is spotted in sports, early on, in music, in dance yet, picking outliers of one in five thousand on cognitive capabilities is not tempting. Wasted outliers.

    In what average IQ has meaning mostly is that the middle the curve provides the run-off. After that it is all up to the outliers, to be bored and suppressed in the dumb systemics of our society.

    The likes of Gates and Davos. Throw enough money at a problem and it serves a gateway to the next pothole. There is always the servile middle class to cater to the billy-o-naires.

    The constricted blur of reality, of our compliments, goes to relative riches, very poor indeed as compared to incremental advances, a net result after derivatives.

  • At Our Wit’s End: Why We’re Becoming Less Intelligent and What It Means for Our Future Edward Dutton and Michael A. Woodley of Menie Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, 2018 We in the West have long become accustomed to the idea that scientific and technological progress is the normal state of things, although decline—technological deterioration and...
  • @Sean
    @m___


    “Any AI smart enough to pass a Turing test is smart enough to know to fail it.”
    ― Ian McDonald, River of Gods
     
    chess strategy

    Garry Kasparov, who gave his own perspective on it, noting:

    (...) I admit that I was pleased to see that AlphaZero had a dynamic, open style like my own. The conventional wisdom was that machines would approach perfection with endless dry maneuvering, usually leading to drawn games. But in my observation, AlphaZero prioritizes piece activity over material, preferring positions that to my eye looked risky and aggressive.
     
    Noting that both John von Neumann and Bertrand Russell advocated a nuclear strike, or the threat of one, to prevent the Soviets acquiring the atomic bomb, Nick Bostrom says the relatively unlimited means of superintelligence might make for its analysis moving along different lines to the evolved "diminishing returns" assessments that in humans confer a basic aversion to risk

    There is what I call a “good-story bias” that limits what kind of scenarios can be explored in novels and movies: only ones that are entertaining. This set may not overlap much with the group of scenarios that are probableFor example, in a story, there usually have to be humanlike protagonists, a few of which play a pivotal role, facing a series of increasingly difficult challenges, and the whole thing has to take enough time to allow interesting plot complications to unfold. Maybe there is a small team of humans, each with different skills, which has to overcome some interpersonal difficulties in order to collaborate to defeat an apparently invincible machine which nevertheless turns out to have one fatal flaw (probably related to some sort of emotional hang-up).

    One kind of scenario that one would not see on the big screen is one in which nothing unusual happens until all of a sudden we are all dead and then the Earth is turned into a big computer that performs some esoteric computation for the next billion years. https://blog.oup.com/2014/09/interview-nick-bostrom-superintelligence/
     

    Replies: @m___

    Your point is taken. We probably will not see the coming. That is none of us, no cluster, will scale to the difference of speed assessing more variables, thus better decisions. As is, as an example, the humanoid is bluffing and playing stone age war games, while mostly un-aware, that these obsolete maneuvers only concern positioning in a systemically dumb concept of our restricted reality, where we happen to make out, where things are made up, where reality fits not. Even our concepts of being obsolete, becoming irrelevant, becoming extinct are grounded in pre modern human psychological concepts. Thinking rationally has been a deadly mutation.

    Clusters of humans, indeed scale badly, no cabling yet, to take advantage of assimilating more variables to better draft scenarios. Big data, a necessary pillar of better analysis is such a delusion, not because intrinsic value not being up to the promise, but caduque algorithmic searches and pre-poned questions, as to what to look for by human operators.

    The certainty that the humanoid needs refactoring or bust, beats the anguish about AI ever materializing learning capacity. There is another “promising” factor at play, it is computerized analysis, processing power, and only that, what can give us a workable understanding of ourselves. DNA and the universe around it, and if that leads to manipulation of our nature, could be a path out.

    No matter what takes the laurels, no drastic change beyond our comprehension stands for “drowning” in a matter of generations. Our tools, though brainless, have already mastered us. Imagine, imagine, we cannot.

    Thanks for your interchange.

    Our human “emotional” preference: genetic manipulation, and live to fight another round.

  • Maybe Donald Trump isn’t as stupid as I thought. I’d hate to have to admit that publicly, but it does kind of seem like he has put one over on the liberal corporate media this time. Scanning the recent Trump-related news, I couldn’t help but notice a significant decline in the number of references to...
  • @Ilyana_Rozumova
    @m___

    How right you are!!!! Hyenas fighting for the mouthful.
    Lets see now Haiti If there will be an interest to remove their president.

    Replies: @m___

    On Haiti et al.

    Haiti can stay what it is, a social, milito-politico experiment, the smallest lab globally. Less significant then Gaza, and for that matter Israel. They are the close up experiments to follow.

    Nothing concerning Haiti matters in the real world. The Clintons netted a half a hundred million out of it, no sweat, really, a one man pay. No game for deep state, the bounty is not worth the ammunition.

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    @m___

    That's what I thought so. But somebody (relevant) may notice the hypocrisy.

  • @JohnSmith
    "...a supranational global capitalist empire, a decentralized, interdependent network of global corporations, financial institutions, national governments, intelligence agencies, supranational governmental entities, military forces, media, and so on..."

    Mussolini called the system "corporatism", Orwell called it "oligarchical collectivism". The network is complex but it is certainly not "decentralized".

    The Rockefeller CFR and its interlocking affiliates (Brookings, Aspen, Davos, Bilderberg, CSIS, CNAS, Atlantic Council, etc) have dominated US policy since WW2. Most of the Fed chairmen and the secretaries of State, Treasury, Defense and CIA have been members of the CFR network. Many of the major post-war institutions (United Nations, World Bank, IMF, NATO, etc) were founded by CFR members.

    Exxon, Chevron, BP, BlackRock, Deutsche Bank and Pfizer are corporate sponsors of the Rockefeller CFR along with Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Lockheed, Boeing, Northrop, Raytheon, Time-Warner, Reuters, Google and Facebook. Several of their directors and execs are also CFR members. See lists in the CFR annual report.

    Replies: @jacques sheete, @m___

    No stealth, no power. No global reach no reach at all. No centralized execution, no strategic survival. No disparate physical presence, no quality of life.

    The ‘groups’ mentioned were first in building a working model of an imposing concept that tends to prefer conceptual thinking above “markets”. They own the merit.

    Where it fails is in the goals and “desires” of what is to be the long term future of our planet, and what the extroversion of the human presence, the individual quality of life should be. The tools are shaped, and can be molded, what fails is the concepts, that can be sustained over generations with maximal stability.

    A single notion, to see every individual as human, equal, and having rights, will have to fade.

  • @anonymous
    Very well said.

    And the propaganda is not always easy to spot. Just this morning, I questioned a needless sentence conveying the Establishment line on Venezuela in the featured article here at Unz about South Africa. It might be revealing to search for “Venezuala” in other, seemingly unrelated articles.

    Replies: @llloyd, @m___

    Associative thinking and searching will unearth the obvious, so obvious, it leads to frustration…

  • The trap of the outlier. You, Hopkins, strayed of, the message is not ready to be absorbed, it is not digestive. Not appetizing, it goes against our nature of “commoner” Americans.
    You are too far out in the wing, …or not far enough, the draft is getting at you.

    Unfortunately, there is no America. There is nothing to make great again. “America” is a fiction, a fantasy, a nostalgia that hucksters like Donald Trump (and other, marginally less buffoonish hucksters) use to sell whatever they are selling … themselves, wars, cars, whatever. What there is, in reality, instead of America, is a supranational global capitalist empire, a decentralized, interdependent network of global corporations, financial institutions, national governments, intelligence agencies, supranational governmental entities, military forces, media, and so on. If that sounds far-fetched or conspiratorial, look at what is going on in Venezuela.

    On Juan Guaido (alas gaio, young rooster, as his predecessors in the family tried to botch his peasant modes). No testing for education, IQ, achievement, as all politicians out of the blue. Could have been a horse, “but it is our horse”. By the way we got our own “Ron Gaio”, next president, shimmering to be useful somewhere in the future.

    The entire global capitalist empire is working in concert to force the elected president of the country out of office. The US, the UK, Canada, France, Germany, Spain, Austria, Denmark, Poland, the Netherlands, Israel, Brazil, Peru, Chile, and Argentina have officially recognized Juan Guaido as the legitimate president of Venezuela…}

    Could it be said that the “elites” are global, “Americans” are stuck locally.

    What what about those American oil corporations? They want that Venezuelan oil, don’t they? Well, sure they do, but here’s the thing … there are no “American” oil corporations. Corporations, especially multi-billion dollar transnational corporations (e.g., Chevron, ExxonMobil, et al.) have no nationalities…

    Global capitalism has done away with them. Which is why we are experiencing a “neo-nationalist” backlash. Trump, Brexit, the so-called “new populism” … these are the death throes of national sovereignty…

    Yes, evidently and manifestly, there is some global rule tentatives, since over thirty years, (allowing time to dawn into the minds of the money elites’ skulls).
    What is the hardest parts of this? For the locals, most certainly, giving up the idea that as a group they are defined as Americans, have a stake in the global riches or as it goes decadence. That they will get lucky on an individual basis.

    [MORE]

    Just with a slight advantage as to efficiency, not big enough to analyse the long term future, but at least in suppressing the global tarball masses, the elites, once in a while making coherent decisions, mostly infighting which of course furthers the cause as much as non in a timely manner.

    Globalism must be, at least the planet and it’s near surroundings cannot be grasped in a systemic way by considering problems on a local scale. Bolshevism was global, Fascism had a global aspect, Christianity had global ambitions, and all showed some phenotype of it. They were mal digested, as compared to Capitalism propping the cocoon dream of individual comforts and no responsibility. The religion of consumerism at the low end of financial capitalism is the grandstand of history in crowd control.

    So thus the “American” elites, and Trump, the moron baby of a misfiring and only concerns them so much as to their ego, the crowds are not their foremost problem.

    Crowd control is not the biggest issue, but how to sustain capitalism is. Since to some insiders the limited shelve live left of current method and means butting the environment, toxicity, secondary derivatives, of anything conceptually doctored are showing. The uncontrolled growing global populations, the migratory effects beyond their grasp mostly, but as phenomena to be addressed are ostensibly visible even to them.

    Globalism must be, the question is how to build it on to long term goals. The, in the public domain politicians, who better understand this, and can level with the global corporations, seem to be the clusters around Putin and the Chinese elites. Their public appearance is more homogeneous by far, American politics looks and feels cheap, an old flip-flop.

    “American” corporations, have not gotten rid of the believe in theoretical economics of “growth”.
    Mind most of their own brethrens believe in it (a Jared, a Trump are genuinely erratic), the concept of what real power means has not yet dawned. As it goes, they are squandering their own off-spring’s chances, and their interests of privilege over the long term (ten generations should not be thinking too far ahead).

    Crowd control, (Macron), growth economics, copy catted from base American method and history, (Russia and China alike, nothing much new), national economies (Victor Orban, Trump), politics as a whole are nothing but obsolete.
    Their are no historical models that are applicable to reality as is.
    Ex nihilo, “nobody knows” should rule. Outliers not unlike Assange should be the norm.

    In fact, tacking as goes, since the complexity of the overview requires extensive analysis, but here what concerns: the “American locals” do not want so much as to assume failure of systemics, systemics is an abstract, that is not what a human brain is built for.

    Excesses of their own elites, are pertinent, acute, the matter to them. The “American dream” is kept alive by inertia of these same crowds (immigrants as what they stand for in the bigger part, are the champions).

    Now for the real issue, the middle class bread-scribes, the caterers to public opinion, might be obsolete in less then a generation. Hopkins prepare for your insignificance. Or has it been felt yet? The future of yours is racks with rags, since crowd control can be done much more efficiently without recourse to a “media” middle class, as is conceived today.

    There is no predictive power in our comment, nor is their in your article, we are way late , way out, (for one George Carlin, and in lay terms, to a chock-full auditorium, throwing base humor to meaningful content) was better at it.

    As a whole this above average public forum, cannot, does not grasp the meaning of relevancy, overview, based on rational, as compared to “smart” psychological shoveling, and astute advantage taking of old tactics of numbers before all.
    Ron is our hero, he herds, and if herding means not grazing the flats, then so be it.
    For you Hopkins, if told so, the sheep of our flock, indeed, do not like the flats.

    AI, better expressed as “taking decisions based on massive and intelligibly sorted out data, throwing algorithms at data till a scenario can be squeezed out that cannot be contradicted by it’s own data, seeing history as another local pathway, or America now as an historical perspective inside other localities, going from a two dimensional world in politics to at least three”, will replace the grandest idiocies, but at once do away with linear journalism. Every war has it’s victims, as it goes, looks like the middle class is up next. Human processors scale badly, put two smart individuals together, and you get not necessarily a benefit, put two morons together and most certainly one gets multiplied randomness.

    Or, who knows, Americans (and other Western consumers) might take a page from those Yellow Vests, set aside their political differences (or at least ignore their hatred of each other long enough to actually try to achieve something), and focus their anger at the politicians and corporations that actually run the empire, as opposed to, you know, illegal immigrants and imaginary legions of Nazis and Russians. In the immortal words of General Buck Turgidson, “I’m not saying we wouldn’t get our hair mussed,” but, heck, it might be worth a try, especially since, the way things are going, we are probably going end up out there anyway.

    That our dear friend Hopkins, is praying, not what priests do.
    Get organized, have a stealthy approach in parallel, gather the courage left in your old bones, not wack off on the wall.
    Top down will stay as a feature, global will stay as a feature, the “numbers games” of theoretical economics (college Hudson, staying always one step short of systemic abuse), of indirectly growing global populations, proportionately shrinking populations, migrations, need to be addressed as such.

    Nature points the way, we can readily observe what happens to bees …and big mamals when “disgenic” concepts settle in. Toxicity learns us precious lessons.

    We appreciate your efforts C.J. but they are sterile and humorless under the cover of seriousness. Do not forget, the reason, we readers (and commenters), linger here and not in front of different screen fill, is because of our limited progressive cognizance, not our superior intellects. We are not ready for your message, our nature, emotions, are tuned to looking for the bad guy and pointing fingers to what was, what be, (Saker), what is close to our consumer cocoon, is what matters to us.

    We need structure, you offer none, we need solutions in the short term, we have partisan interests, and we need repetition-ing of easy conceptuals, preferably spiced up with graphics (A. Karlin?).

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    @m___

    How right you are!!!! Hyenas fighting for the mouthful.
    Lets see now Haiti If there will be an interest to remove their president.

    Replies: @m___

  • At Our Wit’s End: Why We’re Becoming Less Intelligent and What It Means for Our Future Edward Dutton and Michael A. Woodley of Menie Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, 2018 We in the West have long become accustomed to the idea that scientific and technological progress is the normal state of things, although decline—technological deterioration and...
  • @Sean
    But will the next wave of rising general intelligence be human?

    Replies: @m___, @ChuckOrloski

    Unlikely, in the conventional sense. Might be very similar to stat polygenic scores. Will be impossible to interprete outcomes.

    Our guess, most individuals will become irrelevant in the larger sense. The fishing systematically for outliers, and it’s neglect, makes for the human hardwired failure.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @m___


    “Any AI smart enough to pass a Turing test is smart enough to know to fail it.”
    ― Ian McDonald, River of Gods
     
    chess strategy

    Garry Kasparov, who gave his own perspective on it, noting:

    (...) I admit that I was pleased to see that AlphaZero had a dynamic, open style like my own. The conventional wisdom was that machines would approach perfection with endless dry maneuvering, usually leading to drawn games. But in my observation, AlphaZero prioritizes piece activity over material, preferring positions that to my eye looked risky and aggressive.
     
    Noting that both John von Neumann and Bertrand Russell advocated a nuclear strike, or the threat of one, to prevent the Soviets acquiring the atomic bomb, Nick Bostrom says the relatively unlimited means of superintelligence might make for its analysis moving along different lines to the evolved "diminishing returns" assessments that in humans confer a basic aversion to risk

    There is what I call a “good-story bias” that limits what kind of scenarios can be explored in novels and movies: only ones that are entertaining. This set may not overlap much with the group of scenarios that are probableFor example, in a story, there usually have to be humanlike protagonists, a few of which play a pivotal role, facing a series of increasingly difficult challenges, and the whole thing has to take enough time to allow interesting plot complications to unfold. Maybe there is a small team of humans, each with different skills, which has to overcome some interpersonal difficulties in order to collaborate to defeat an apparently invincible machine which nevertheless turns out to have one fatal flaw (probably related to some sort of emotional hang-up).

    One kind of scenario that one would not see on the big screen is one in which nothing unusual happens until all of a sudden we are all dead and then the Earth is turned into a big computer that performs some esoteric computation for the next billion years. https://blog.oup.com/2014/09/interview-nick-bostrom-superintelligence/
     

    Replies: @m___

  • Unlike Finland, Israel has limited land and very little water. Yet, from Mosaic: Israel's Demographic Miracle OFIR HAIVRY, MAY 7 2018 Birthrates are falling across the world, especially in developed nations—except in one. How did mainstream, middle-class Israelis start having children again, and what does it mean? ... In 2015, Israel’s general fertility rate was...
  • @istevefan
    @Almost Missouri


    No. Group A is diminishing 10% per generation while Group B is growing 15% per generation. The difference isn’t “half a child” or even 25 percentage points. The difference is the future or lack of it. The difference is literally infinite.
     
    Interesting analysis. But your conclusion only matters if Group A has competition in its territory. If Group A is safely alone in its territory it will face a population decrease, but that might not be a bad thing. This is why the USA and the European world are staring at the abyss, while Japan and South Korea are not. Our birth rates would not necessarily be a problem in and of themselves. They are a problem because our leaders have opened our borders to all comers.

    Replies: @Tyrion 2, @m___, @Tyrion 2, @Almost Missouri

    This is why the USA and the European world are staring at the abyss, while Japan and South Korea are not. Our birth rates would not necessarily be a problem in and of themselves. They are a problem because our leaders have opened our borders to all comers.

    Regardless of the math problem being pasted over. There is a clear point to be made by you.

    People and their policies come and go. It is mostly one step forward, two steps backwards. Whether Europe will make a U-turn, we cannot anticipate. But interestingly, rarely mentioned in these fora, the concept of first deciding what the future should be built on, then vie for it, rather then lapping up problems defecating problems, all in one day, is received loud and clear.

    Then yes, reduced populations per territory, should not be considered at all, a liability. Secondly the proportionality globally of population groups, and their distribution over livable landmasses, and later hopefully extra-Terra colonies should be considered, tweaked and tuned. Through migration policies, mentality changes, higher quality population genetics tuning, precise and vast data applications. It cannot be that an argument for higher birthrates for Whites is based on counter-arresting the push of “other” populations.

    To get back to Israel as of today, it is the single most pertinent sociological, political, ethnical, military confined as can be, lab study of our days. To go narrow, address one’s own plate of mush, in some cases, in this case, is not the way a global comprehension of what the world should be, should grow. In matters of migrations and populations, the US is not the mathematical zero.

    Populations, their collective behaviour, their planetary spread, are the single most important factor as to solving the long term future. Long being plus ten generations, should be within the reach of the one percent of individuals with means and some kind of passable intellect. Trying anything else but what failed, the times are ripe for “conceptual”, ex-nihilo, Darwinesque approaches.

  • @Almost Missouri
    This comment is about the misunderstood arithmetic of Total Fertility Rates.

    From the text:

    [From] 7.5 [to] 6.7 [=] a drop of 10 percent.

    [From] 4.0 [to] 4.2 [=] a rise of perhaps 5 percent.

    from about 2.6 ... to 3.0 [=] an increase of about 15 percent.

    from about 2.1 ... to about 2.6 [=] almost 20 percent

    from about 1.8... to about 2.1 [=] rose by almost 15 percent
     
    Leaving aside all the estimates and assumptions that are built into TFRs and leaving aside the fact that TFR totally ignores the effect of faster or slower generations, people, even intelligent people, commonly misunderstand the arithmetic of TFR.

    The above-quoted percent changes appear mathematically correct, indeed they are mathematically correct ... in a reality that revolves around zero as the fulcrum point. But in TFR reality, zero is not the fulcrum point, two is (or about 2.1, depending on certain details.) To use zero-fulcrum arithmetic in a two-fulcrum world is to be misled.

    A normal, zero-fulcrum reader of this text will think, "Ah, the first population's growth rate will slow by 10%, the second's rate will increase by 5%, the third by 15%, etc."

    No. Wrong wrong wrong.

    As the fulcrum point in TFR is two-ish, the first population's growth rate has dropped not by 10%, but by (from 5.5 to 4.7 additional people per procreating pair) about 14%.

    The second population's growth rate has increased not by 5% but by (from 2.0 to 2.2 additional people per procreating pair) about 10%, about double the change the misled reader thinks they're getting.

    Note that these errors become more dramatic the closer you get to the fulcrum point (two). The last quoted example (from 1.8 to 2.1) is not a 15% change in reality. Since the 0.3 TFR difference straddles the fulcrum, the real world change is infinity(!) percent, which sounds absurd, but when you consider that at 1.8 the population was headed for extinction, while at 2.1 they are headed for rebirth, suddenly that ∞% change appears as a ratification of the reality on the ground rather than as a muddling of it as happens when bored journalists abstractly run habitual math on bloodless bits.

    Note further that this is even more relevant for discussions of European and American TFR where subgroups with apparently only slightly different TFR near the fulcrum point are competing for the same land.

    Native Group A has TFR 1.8 while immigrant Group B has TFR 2.3?

    The conventional reader sees this and subconsciously thinks, well it's only "half a child" difference so it doesn't matter too much.

    No. Group A is diminishing 10% per generation while Group B is growing 15% per generation. The difference isn't "half a child" or even 25 percentage points. The difference is the future or lack of it. The difference is literally infinite.

    Ever heard of compound interest? This is the same thing, but with life. Also, chances are that Group A has long (30+ year) generations, while Group B has short (20-ish year) generations, so this is really compound interest on steroids around a baseline of two rather than zero.

    Replies: @m___, @istevefan

    A beauty of meaningful reasoning, but lost to our crowd. This is by design.

    The unz.com site seeks to weight opinion by the standard tools. Somewhere to be of use, somehow, to be sold as statistical data to poll and politics designers, a platform to lift some hapstancer to fame for a day. Short attention spans, repeated errors, circular reasoning, pliers statistics (Karlin is the champ), it is ever present and meant to be. Not Hollywood, not RT, certainly not Russia Insider, or Amy Goodman, but as close as the niche allows.

    You better hush off to some deeper cave, because here you are in the middle of a circus, a turning “caroussel”, and it is designed to be just that.

    A regular commenter, Peter Auss, points to the situation as a bar, a pub, and that is close. A stylish Wien-isch coffeehouse, with succulent pastries, discreet music, not Starbucks, but still, parvenu. We are what we are, and that is still a fraction above anything else called “The American People”.

  • The Saker: Could you summarize the state of Venezuela’s economy when Chavez came to power? Michael Hudson: Venezuela was an oil monoculture. Its export revenue was spent largely on importing food and other necessities that it could have produced at home. Its trade was largely with the United States. So despite its oil wealth, it...
  • @Cyrano
    You’d think that US and Venezuela have lot in common and that they should build their relationship based on some similar bad experiences that they have suffered in the last few years.

    After all, both countries had their presidents installed by an unfriendly foreign power – in the case of US – that was Russia and in the case of Venezuela – that’s US that did them the favor of choosing the proper president for them.

    It’s common knowledge now that without the Russian interference in the US electoral system – which as we all know works like a clockwork (orange), Trump would have never been elected as president of US – because that’s not who they are.

    And now the US - embittered by that experience -has decided to do the same thing to Venezuela. I see bad Russian influence everywhere. I think that indirectly – Russia is responsible for the crisis in Venezuela. If they hadn’t elected Trump for president in US, it would have never occurred to the Americans that it could be done. That’s not how democracies work.

    Replies: @m___

    Appreciating the humor, BMI of the actors, and the elegance of the choir.

  • The end of America’s unchallenged global economic dominance has arrived sooner than expected, thanks to the very same Neocons who gave the world the Iraq, Syria and the dirty wars in Latin America. Just as the Vietnam War drove the United States off gold by 1971, its sponsorship and funding of violent regime change wars...
  • @AnonFromTN
    Generally speaking, you’d think that whoever is on the top perch wouldn’t try to upset the existing order. But that’s if those on the top perch have any brains. The US is consistently undermining itself and every aspect of its dominance for the last ~20 years, which shows that American elites degenerated to the point of being medically certifiable.

    Somewhere on this site I saw a great pic: “FBI uncovered new Al Qaida plot: sit back and watch America destroy itself”.

    Replies: @m___, @Harold Smith

    Generally speaking, you’d think that whoever is on the top perch wouldn’t try to upset the existing order. But that’s if those on the top perch have any brains. The US is consistently undermining itself and every aspect of its dominance for the last ~20 years, which shows that American elites degenerated to the point of being medically certifiable.

    The commoners, always a substance of meat merry on, but some opportunistic insiders and even some outliers can see it. Loyalty within the elites is breaking down, meaning the few real counselors and allowed strategists are sided. No Brzezinski no Kissinger, individuals regardless of their ideas, but having some consequence and substance, with the intellectual stamina to drive the herd of dykes that are visible on the media scene, they cannot streamline the plot. The other so called “experts” are just confused and opportunistic. The theater and it’s actors doubt their picks, cannot judge, even the quality of their “souffleurs”. That is why the scenario changes constantly. There is no sustainable scenario left.

    Notice, there is more coherence, stability, synchronous, and lasting “palabrar” in Russia and China. That is how biodiversity creeps in. The elites should mentalize their backbone, they are going to need it. The war is not on the crowds, that one is long won. It is in the chambers of the palace. By level of importance, the potty boy, the courtisan, the officer of the guard, they are preying. The middle class, the submissive class, the confidentes of the parlours of power play the day to day.

    Sit back and enjoy, why should life be petty and pretty when it can be brutal and short-lived. Stumps and screeches from the top, call it tweets. As the tools define the message. The sitcom is becoming less and lees boring.

  • @m___
    @Biff


    On SWIFT, "created, centered, stationed" in Belgium
     
    Does a database, and a service of encrypted mail messages have a home? The home is where the server is. Since the server is replicated onto other hardware machines, since there is to be controlled routing involved, ...since the sloppiness of comprehension for most is limited to the "software" protocols who run up and down the beacons of routers... since accounting principles are as flawed from one side of the globe to the other, Belgium has no meaning in the script.

    Belgium ...is where some high paid salaried SWIFT jobbers are plugged into the financial lifeline, for tax reasons and public deceit. SWIFT is no different from Western Union at scale, Fecesbook, or Google, serfs of the powers that be, playing out their minimal comprehension of things digital, admittedly so far ahead of our politicians that they can monetize on ignorance in the short term.

    Now since the US dollar becomes a "local" affair. Russia and China, and the ones that see an alternative there, being it a polar world again, do provide a plug into their hard and soft and accounting alternative. Thus SWIFT might return to "small business" status (less transaction volume meaning less need for tools to assist perverting reality. For what it is worth, a happy affair, submissiveness to the mafia overlords will pay less. Not that Russia, or China, will do a better job of fair accounting, but it cannot get worse, and it has lasted in public terms "a very long time".

    Any warrior, that seeks to unplug can play pirate and Ruble or Renminbi, or anything exotic called "financial tools". And they should, and some will, we'd be amazed that speculating the short term does not include Russia or China, or Bitcoin, or Switzerland. Impossible to ignore for any bankster institution, meat of politician, or greedy business man.

    Where Hudson is not helpful is in going that next step. Before ...and afer Trump, see the nihilistic misery spec. of the "while" in between the two, the accounting of assets and liabilities, at the very base and core of human interaction was always flawed. It had a good reason, the ledger was unable to grasp the magnitude of what represents the planet, the dynamics, the volume, any angle one prefers to give to it. Theoretical economics is alchemy, not physics, nor engineering.

    The problem today in making better assessments is smaller, assets and liabilities do not have to be condensed in primitive tokens as Dollar, or Gold or Bitcoin for the matter. AI, to be understood as operating on massive data sets, can give an idea, better then any Stock Exchange, real-time to "all" (as in all that have an interest and the minimal comprehension) what the state of the world is to be. The stock exchanges, came to similar conclusions, of course to convert and divert to the riches of a few. The idea is not new, the goal to which it applies can be baked into another definition of ethical "liberalism".

    That kind of liberalism, concern and solubility on a planetary scale and the long term, of course, is wasted on human nature, Hudson included. Seems Hudson likes as change of skeleton to hang his coat on, and have the mary-go-round revolve for another spin. The good guys and the bad ones. As for poor Trump, in the ledger of the planet, the longer run, his bucket has no meaning.

    Replies: @m___, @renfro

    By the way, our sincere compliments to magnanimous Ron for his impeccable formatting in the narrow sense. The blue-es, the black-es, the grey-es, there is a beauty and sophistication in the html and css as posted here, the correlated functionality.

    See, to draw it once more into the open, less can be better. A world by design, rather then an accumulation of debris. Now let’s match the content to our beautiful environment as interacted upon by the poly-genic Ron.

    Left, how to plug into the misery text boxes, an external editor of choice. Or is that a browser issue?

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
    @m___

    OK. I'll try to be polite.
    The US can't sustain its support for the global order. That is why Trump is taking it down. The Neocons are "so smart and so stupid". That is part of why Trump is using them as tools, the other part being that he's fully committed to the border affair, and can't win anything else for the time being.
    Trump's strength is that he understands the big things, and competently acts on the understanding. In real estate, that's why his bets paid off. On the border affair, Trump will use executive rule to seal the border, but only if no other alternative can be found. Trump, at least, realizes that when he uses executive rule, he won't be able to stop. That will be the end of US Federal legitimacy for a very large chunk of the US resident population. And end to Federal legitimacy is a bad thing, but not as bad as continued immigration. Continued immigration would do the same thing plus start an ethnic civil war among the various immigrant groups. You can see starting now with the Democratic Presidential contenders -- not a one of which commands support outside she/he/it's (sheheit's, for short) ethnic/sexual/religions groups.
    So: if you want the US to tear itself apart any further by playing (albeit ineffectively) nanny to the world, I politely suggest that you want something else (as your wants are a waste of your time), and that you prepare, for once in your life, to be on your own rather than ragging your parents.

    Counterinsurgency

    Replies: @Counterinsurgency, @Counterinsurgency

  • @Biff

    But now, cyber warfare has become a way of pulling out the connections of any economy. And the major cyber connections are financial money-transfer ones, headed by SWIFT, the acronym for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, which is centered in Belgium.
     
    My guess is SWIFT was created/centered in Belgium just to give it an aire of international credibility, but it seems to be just a subsidiary of Wall Street since all the transactions are run through Wall Street offices.
    Consider how French, and German banks are often sanctioned and fined by Wall Street. Who’s really in control?

    Replies: @atlantis_dweller, @Anonymous, @m___

    On SWIFT, “created, centered, stationed” in Belgium

    Does a database, and a service of encrypted mail messages have a home? The home is where the server is. Since the server is replicated onto other hardware machines, since there is to be controlled routing involved, …since the sloppiness of comprehension for most is limited to the “software” protocols who run up and down the beacons of routers… since accounting principles are as flawed from one side of the globe to the other, Belgium has no meaning in the script.

    Belgium …is where some high paid salaried SWIFT jobbers are plugged into the financial lifeline, for tax reasons and public deceit. SWIFT is no different from Western Union at scale, Fecesbook, or Google, serfs of the powers that be, playing out their minimal comprehension of things digital, admittedly so far ahead of our politicians that they can monetize on ignorance in the short term.

    Now since the US dollar becomes a “local” affair. Russia and China, and the ones that see an alternative there, being it a polar world again, do provide a plug into their hard and soft and accounting alternative. Thus SWIFT might return to “small business” status (less transaction volume meaning less need for tools to assist perverting reality. For what it is worth, a happy affair, submissiveness to the mafia overlords will pay less. Not that Russia, or China, will do a better job of fair accounting, but it cannot get worse, and it has lasted in public terms “a very long time”.

    Any warrior, that seeks to unplug can play pirate and Ruble or Renminbi, or anything exotic called “financial tools”. And they should, and some will, we’d be amazed that speculating the short term does not include Russia or China, or Bitcoin, or Switzerland. Impossible to ignore for any bankster institution, meat of politician, or greedy business man.

    Where Hudson is not helpful is in going that next step. Before …and afer Trump, see the nihilistic misery spec. of the “while” in between the two, the accounting of assets and liabilities, at the very base and core of human interaction was always flawed. It had a good reason, the ledger was unable to grasp the magnitude of what represents the planet, the dynamics, the volume, any angle one prefers to give to it. Theoretical economics is alchemy, not physics, nor engineering.

    The problem today in making better assessments is smaller, assets and liabilities do not have to be condensed in primitive tokens as Dollar, or Gold or Bitcoin for the matter. AI, to be understood as operating on massive data sets, can give an idea, better then any Stock Exchange, real-time to “all” (as in all that have an interest and the minimal comprehension) what the state of the world is to be. The stock exchanges, came to similar conclusions, of course to convert and divert to the riches of a few. The idea is not new, the goal to which it applies can be baked into another definition of ethical “liberalism”.

    That kind of liberalism, concern and solubility on a planetary scale and the long term, of course, is wasted on human nature, Hudson included. Seems Hudson likes as change of skeleton to hang his coat on, and have the mary-go-round revolve for another spin. The good guys and the bad ones. As for poor Trump, in the ledger of the planet, the longer run, his bucket has no meaning.

    • Replies: @m___
    @m___

    By the way, our sincere compliments to magnanimous Ron for his impeccable formatting in the narrow sense. The blue-es, the black-es, the grey-es, there is a beauty and sophistication in the html and css as posted here, the correlated functionality.

    See, to draw it once more into the open, less can be better. A world by design, rather then an accumulation of debris. Now let's match the content to our beautiful environment as interacted upon by the poly-genic Ron.

    Left, how to plug into the misery text boxes, an external editor of choice. Or is that a browser issue?

    Replies: @Counterinsurgency

    , @renfro
    @m___


    AI, to be understood as operating on massive data sets, can give an idea, better then any
     
    I am not aware of any Artificial Intelligence that can totally replicate human nature.
    Therefore its predictive abilities will not always be accurate.

    Replies: @Macon messages and cons, @Donald A Thomson

  • This is the fourth in a series of posts about the demographics of the coming Age of Malthusian Industrialism. In the decades and centuries to come, technological progress will slow to a crawl, as dysgenic reproduction patterns deplete the world's remaining smart fractions (assuming that there are no abrupt discontinuities in humanity's capacity for collective...
  • @TG
    Interesting post, but at bottom it is very simple.

    The issue is not the carrying capacity. Neither Malthus, nor Mills nor Keynes nor Ma Yinchu etc. ever set a limit to global population. It's the rate of increase. The absolute population is only really relevant in that, at a certain level, the capital investments needed to accommodate each new individual reach diminishing returns, and a rate of increase that could be handled at a lower population density suddenly becomes untenable.

    Remember that Malthus was not a prophet, he was an observer. He accurately pointed out that, for societies without an open frontier, exponential growth is so powerful that if a nation tries to double its population every 20 years or so, it will soon fail, and of necessity the average person will be crushed into subsistence level poverty. This was not a prediction. This is how it has worked, how it works today.

    The issue of how many people the earth can support is, to a great extent, meaningless. If we allow the rich to push for ever more population growth, sooner or later we will hit an effective limit. At that point people will be crushed into miserable poverty. That will happen. Whether it happens at 10 billion or 100 billion or a trillion, will be of little interest to the average person then living.

    And it's mostly the rich that are doing this. Whether by encouraging high rates of fertility, or allowing the surplus population of the third-world to cancel out low fertility rates elsewhere (and no this doesn't just move people around: every person allowed to escape from places like Haiti or Bangladesh just makes room for an extra person to back home), and perhaps most powerfully, by censoring any mention of how people having more children than they can reasonably support is the single biggest source of poverty. Because talking about how the rich are encouraging population growth might reduce the ability of the rich to take advantage of all that lovely cheap labor... and because it lets the rich off the hook for what they have worked so hard to achieve.

    Replies: @m___, @animalogic

    Indeed, quality of desire. Is there any conceptual advantage in bigger populations at all. That is even putting aside proportionality.

    The concept of growth, in the future will serve no one, not the ones that matter equally. Mind games, as this piece cannot compensate for mindgames as how to build and sustain quality populations that correspond to abundance of resources and reserves where they constitute a vault for high mind experiments that transgress base principles of producing derivatives and waste.

    Come China, come USA, whatever else, the ugly duck quacks the same.

  • 5G is a national productivity tool whose benefits, like those we derive from our railways, are less noticeable to end users yet critical to industry and commerce. 5G is 20 times faster than 4G, serves as the fast backbone of the “Internet of Things”(IoT), handles a million connected devices/km2 simultaneously with millisecond latency and uses...
  • Throw the brightest minds onto dumb systemics and you get Karlin on G5. Is there a loop on this site that feeds into itself?

  • Fascism in its inception was a distinctly localised phenomenon, growing out of the specific concerns and obsessions of Italians in the immediate post-WWI period. For example, one of the main drivers in the formation of the movement that is little commented on today was the Dalmatian question. During WWI, Italy had been promised Dalmatia --...
  • @Z-man
    @Anon

    Ridiculous post.

    Replies: @m___

    Admittedly, the confusion of language can be unending. But the post if rightfully understood: “authoritarianism” instead of hidden authoritarianism in “democracy”as in the West now-a-days, has but the who exercises it, as a difference.

  • @utu
    Fascism is not a bad thing. Mussolini got it almost right. Few weeks ago I wrote a comment that a populist movement that can bring the left and the right together is the only solution.

    The movement must be populist that folds the left and right together against the cosmopolitan middle that consists of the economic neoliberal right and the cultural left. The nationalism must be its glue and the enemy (there always must be an enemy) the financial international elite. Anyway you cut it it will be some sort of fascism.
     

    Replies: @Che Guava, @m___, @CanSpeccy

    On Facism…

    Fascism is not a bad thing. Mussolini got it almost right. Few weeks ago I wrote a comment that a populist movement that can bring the left and the right together is the only solution.

    The movement must be populist that folds the left and right together against the cosmopolitan…

    …quite to the point.

    A good example of how understanding social and political reality has many a layer. Again, to the core, and after peeling and poking, the above commentary makes sense.

    The big wrong conceptually of Facism as a political theory, is probably the in-tenability of a social system that elaborate and costly. More so today, since the populations versus physical resources is out of proportion. The added value of a population has become a liability. This in less then half a century, two generations. War being obsolete, the strive for wealth rather immensely complex comparably, since bit by bit the exhaustion of physical resources must be in-calculated into a finite world.

    Just as a remark, a dictator, often associated with de facto Facist regimes, can as well be a group. Say “deep state” in the US today, say Bolshevics of the early hour. For one, “media” alas “propaganda” haven’t stopped either.

    That brings us to mention, that Fascism can be a theory of global dominion. Secondly, all and every political theory is outdated, simply because the environment has changed, anywhere locally, on the face of the globe. There are no historical models that correspond to today’s organic reality.

    Finally that makes rummaging as here, quite possible but inutil. Some variables present today, were not, at least that apparent and visible then. Exit old school Fascism, as much as anything else pre financial capitalism, as viable.

  • Harvard scientists insisted last year we had been visited by guests from a galaxy far, far away. Well, almost. The suspected spacecraft Oumuamua first drew close to the earth, but then it accelerated, sped by our planet and disappeared somewhere into Deep Space. What went wrong? Why did the little green men of Vega, the...
  • @niteranger
    @Kratoklastes

    Yes I am familiar with what you are talking about. I've written a lot stuff in a variety languages. The P2P DNS was The Pirate Bay's baby but they abandoned it. Your answer:

    "Their existence, and its absolute antipathy to human progress, requires that I advocate their genocide. It has got past the point where they are simply ‘sand in the gears’ – they are now in the process of eating our seed corn."

    I don't think this will occur till it's too late. Just look at Europe. America is no different. There are number of ways to slowly take them down. But if you want to win you must get a hold on the financial pathways. There are couple of ways this can be done but I won't talk about them here.

    There is also numerous ways of attacking them using a variety of one time only attacks where the actor goes dark and disappears. The reasons the intelligence agencies are able to track these people is because they don't disappear and or brag about their exploits. I know military hackers who play games all night testing each others government installations. What they fear most is the one time attack and the guy immediately goes dark and never shows that again. They are almost never able to get them.

    There are ways around some of these problems you have mentioned including many people are already talking about. Whether they will work out only time will tell. But it's not SJW's you need to worry about. It's the actual institutions that they will be running because they will be put in charge due to their minority or magic status.

    Replies: @m___

    “To stay on the funny side of all of it”

    Encryption and anonymity, on the other side of the problem, transparency and communality. Either end anihilates the other. To use encryption both ends must have a grasp of it, to be anonymous, the ego must be so, to broadcast, the message must be “cheap”, community is built on greed.

    The value of the tool, be it, to be versed into dumb systemics. If less then one percent of the population rules the other end, based on ideas and tools that are a pity, how much peering needs to be done?

  • @AnonFromTN
    @m___

    Pretty pessimistic. Who’s AI, BTW?

    Replies: @m___

    AI, alias “artificial intelligence”. The disappearence of the middle class is mostly a good thing. It is glue that holds the elites in place. They impede any change. Inertia incorporated.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    @m___

    Oh, that AI. It’s artificial all right, but hardly intelligence, except in a very narrow sense, like chess playing. Just shows that chess playing skill is not really intelligence (like we didn’t know it already).

    The middle class was a stabilizing factor for capitalist society created exclusively out of fear of communism. The fear is gone, so middle class will have to go, as it’s too expensive for the mega-thieves (elites, as you call them). Its disappearance destabilizes society, but the elites are extremely shortsighted, blinded by greed. They won’t come to their senses even when they are hung on lampposts. Which they will. Good riddance, too. But the turmoil that will culminate in that won’t be pretty.

  • @DD
    Why the monopoly? There is no monopoly. In fact there are no barriers to entry. MySpace collapsed when it began censoring Iraq war news from the troops (Myspace was the enlisted soldier's network, Facebook was for more-thoroughly indoctrinated officers.) Now that Facebook is treating you like an ant colony, as they planned all along, you'd have to be crazy to be on it. Help Facebook collapse. Here are some of the obvious alternatives:

    https://diasporafoundation.org/
    https://joinmastodon.org/
    https://www.naturalnews.com/046504_Diaspora_Unseenis_uncensored_information.html
    http://leapchat.org/

    You can compete with Facebook yourself - roll your own Diaspora instance. There is no reason in the world why you have to submit to corporate control. Just get the fuck off facebook, twitter all of them.

    You could see at the outset what commercial social networks were designed to do. This commenter does not exist on social networks. Has never existed on social networks.

    Replies: @m___

    Diaspora

    Now what business model might that be?!

    Main question, who finances a bleeder? and on and on… No technicalities apparent, same with a twist? In earlier times, there were fables and “sprookjes” for infants, there was robust semi-lies for the adults. Seems fables graduated, most similar to dumbing down universities to narratives. MacDo for the masses.

  • @AnonFromTN
    @gmachine1729

    Yes, as a stopgap measure one can boycott FB, Twitter, Google, and other services that practice disgusting PC. I don’t use FB or Twitter, use Google only occasionally. Need to stop using it altogether and switch to Yandex and/or Baidu.

    However, in the long run what needs to be built is a PC-free Internet. This would require huge investment that only governments of serious countries (like China or Russia) that are not subservient to the Empire can afford. These governments do have their own axes to grind, but at the moment they are not as disgusting as the Empire and its vassals, or Israel, for that matter.

    Russian and Chinese citizens should try to convince their governments to create this alternative Internet, best in cooperation. Honest sites like this one should migrate to the domains not owned by the Empire and hasbara. But first these domains must be created and equipped. I would gladly pay for service based in non-PC domains.

    I must say that current uniformity of opinions in lugenpresse and the rest of Empire/Israel-controlled media, including electronic one, can only compare to the worst days of Hitler and Stalin. That alone clearly shows that the narrative pushed down our throats is a set of blatant lies: censorship is only needed to fight the truth, as you cannot argue against it.

    Key point is, action, rather than bemoaning the current sad state of affairs, is needed. I wonder how many moaners are ready to act. Any volunteers (knowing full well that Big Brother is watching you)?

    Replies: @AnonFromTN, @m___

    Key point is, action, rather than bemoaning the current sad state of affairs, is needed. I wonder how many moaners are ready to act. Any volunteers (knowing full well that Big Brother is watching you)?

    Nil, none, zil as to volunteers. Whining is an excuse for the passive subversive, the no-balls, low-drive, slow-life, pseudo intellectual. The only graft is getting by on producing nihilistic, irrelevant, incomplete, short-term sputters, almost all utter without even comprehending the toolkit they use. There are other jobbers and intermediates for that.

    No goals, no change, no cause, no plans. “Communication” for the heck of it. To refer back to our earlier comment, it is not the message, it is the automation. Crowd control is done, the joyous part is that the middle-class glory-days as mercenaries to assist the herding, are close to over. They are set up to be swiped into the sludge they tended to cater to. The Ukrainians?, what about AI? AI writes, and getting better at it.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    @m___

    Pretty pessimistic. Who’s AI, BTW?

    Replies: @m___

  • @Steve Naidamast
    Railing against Facebook and other social media outlets is a waste of time since what Israel Shamir is describing is not a problem with such outlets but a problem with Humanity itself.

    Unfortunately, for the species, a large majority of its members are bone-head stupid and this allows for the rise of psychopaths and sociopaths just like Zuckerberg and his acolytes in Silicon Valley along with all the horrific political and business leaders that span the globe.

    There is no way to fight this. Believe me I spent a career trying only to consistently get the same results. True, I got rid of quite a few bad people or at the very least seriously harmed their career growth but there was always some new cockroach to step in.

    What intelligent people on Planet Earth need to do is either build a star-ship and leave this wretched corner of the galaxy or send out SOS messages to request help from a more advanced civilization where many of us would probably feel much more at home...

    Replies: @m___, @jacques sheete

    Three licks from us.

    “Darn, this hillside is cold!”

  • The wining of Shamir (again), the proposed solutions way crappy, the surroundings forgotten (randomly, Cloudflare, Patreon, Twitter, Google, Windows, whatever else (including unz.com), the hardware control (chips on chips, additional chips accessed over proprietary protocols, routers), Social media as such, Any human middle man, the hardware producer.

    When man wants to press a button, pass a message, is it important to be heard harnessing the most? Or is the idea to leave an original message, over time, wasted on immediate interests?

    As Dykstra said above, the truth is dangerous, may we add, networks are built one person at a time, not on shared gloating, but on sweat. His example stands, Spinoza, not to be wasted on history, marrying God and science was not the brightest of ideas admittedly.

    Wayward, backwards, technology, as a pen, a printed page, is to be understood as neutral to innocence, ignorance, and then knowledge. In a next step the crowds are going to disappear even to themselves in blandness, the real consequence being the middle-class becoming insignificant, since crowd control is automation, not what is said. There might be correlation and causation depending on the way one ventures into it. Does Shamir realize that twenty years from now that a similar persona will be worth the rags on his back?

    Crowdfunding?, a laugh, collecting a fraction of the trickle down of job serfs, what we need is Clowns. Assange, the block chain, printed books, not scribes and whiners who do not (Shamir), or do well understand media tools (Unz Ron?) and set up for abuse, are compromised to the neck. Which of both is worse.

  • I am among the few to have had the good fortune of growing up in France. I did know that most of the world was poorer than my country and that some people in far away and not-so-far away lands were still dying in wars. But talk of “globalization” was already all the rage and...
  • @Counterinsurgency
    @m___

    Writing is hard!!! I don't do it all that well, either.

    I sometimes think that all public writing is a form of fantasy. That's one reason I look to science fiction -- it's obviously not about any observable reality. Same with anime -- clearly not about humans as they can be seen in daily life. Reduces the chance that I'll get entrained by the fiction and confuse it with reality. Of course, it also means I'm caught up in the archetypes that both fictional forms use and re-use.

    Public writing is yet another form of fantasy, even when it is seriously meant to be about reality. You mention the audience as a serious part of public writing, and I'm in full agreement. The public writer writes about precisely those things that are _not_ part of the public's daily experiences. The public is thus unable to judge the veracity of the public writer's works. (Example -- the public's assumption that "everybody is all right, really" and that "They're all crooked", which combine to assume that those in the public eye commit only venal sins). This can coax the public writer to describe a reality in which only venal sins are being committed, although the real sins are monstrous (e.g. committing war crimes on a large scale).

    Taking that as a starting point, let's try for more discussion and background, as you suggest. Here's more of something that might be discussion and background:

    I've looked behind the curtain a few times, not many, but enough to see a pattern. Universities (high and low end, research and teaching), NASA, news media, DOD, software, the Moral Majority, etc. In each case the formal and public goals, the exoteric goals, of the organization were not the esoteric goals of the organization. The esoteric goals were always the same: survival.
    A paraphrase from one of Laumer's Retief stories captured it nicely:
    Anonymous Embassy staff member: "Well, if we're not on the alien's side, and we're not on our public's side, whose side are we on?"
    Ambassador Oldtrick: "Our own, of course."

    The US after WW II fits the "lucky fool" [1] or the "holy fool" [2] depending on how you want to look at it. It appears, as Ron Unz has pointed out, that WW II was the result of a grand strategic plan initiated by Lenin and brought to fruition by Stalin. The basic plan was to have the West re-fight WW I, completely ruin itself, and be reorganized by the Red Army. Under this plan, Hitler was a catspaw, who was handed Germany by a deliberate Communist defeat, and who was set up by the Soviet offer of Polish partition. Hitler was, of course, his own grand strategist, and a fairly good one. Good enough, in fact, to spoil Stalin's plan by striking about two weeks before Stalin would have [3]. Hitler attacks about a year too late to win, but just in time to kill enough Soviet troops that Stalin only conquers half of Europe, and Russia is bled so dry that it accomplishes nothing more than gradual decay after Hitler's, emerging only in the early 2000s still not completely recovered from WW II.

    In the meantime, over the Atlantic, FDR was also playing Grand Strategist. He started re-arming during the early New Deal. Without that preparation, which put in place the capital goods and shipyards needed for rapid expansion, the US Navy could not have prevailed in both Atlantic and Pacific during WW II. FDR took quite a few other steps to prepare. So did the War Department, which moved fighting officers into command slots before the US entered WW II. Other than a program of "preparedness", support for the UK, and opposition to Japan, FDR seems to have had no plan other than to engage and defeat the enemy. He couldn't even do that quickly or easily -- and Imperial Japan not bombed Pearl Harbor, and if Hitler hadn't declared war on the US, the us might just have stayed out of WW II.

    So: Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, all played Grand Strategist. All lost heavily, usully through idiotic oversights: Lenin -- expanding the Bolsheviki with Russian natives, who took over. Stalin: making an army that was all offense and no defense, then ignoring Wehrmacht preparations to attack. Hitler: establishing a welfare state that depended on robbing one group to enrich another, but not building the military force to rob on the scale needed, but instead relying on bluff. Mussolini: believing that the Italian Army was a first class fighting force. The only winner was FDR, who won by a timing that was the result of US reluctance to go to war, and of course on building capital goods first, then weapons. Stalin had also emphasized capital goods first, then war, but it hadn't saved him.

    In short, FDR was a middling Grand Strategist, but he was also lucky.

    But try to tell the US public that, and try telling the US leadership that. Hubris reigned back then, and it still does.

    It's like the US emerged from WW II in a dream (look at Disney's work back then), one that needn't be backed up by reality because reality was the Cold War, a USSR with nuclear weapons and (although we didn't know it) a keen sense of the bluff. Better to stay in the dream and pretend (hope) that the system established during WW II would again save us. I've heard Edwardian England (right before WW I) compared to a dream, and I'm comparing the US to a dream in the same way.

    Many in the US are still in the same dream, supporting the establishment. However, most organizations are not in the dream. They are instead exploiting it. Part of the dream was that the US could defeat Communism by converting everybody to the free market, or something similar. To dream that, one had to believe that everybody was potentially a Westerner, with the Western set of abilities and interests. It seemed, back then, as if the alternatives were (a) Dreaming a belief in identical capabilities or (b) waging thermonuclear central war. The US picked dreaming, and many are still picking dreaming, even if the dream is getting a nightmare tinge.

    There were groups that did not pick the dream. These groups instead exploited it. The New Left essentially threatened to destroy the post-WW II dream if they were not put in power, and to continue the dream if they were put in power. A good part of the Postmodernist power today is that anti-realism and anti-individualism implies that one can live in a dream (there is no reality, so everything is a bit like a dream) without being responsible for the choice (because groups make choices, and the nonexistent individual doesn't and can't) or risking the end of the dream (no reality). All that is required is to be nice (favor an egalitarian society) and quiet (check your privilege).

    And that's pretty much what I've seen. Quite a few of these group managers think of themselves as suborned dreamers (as "being realistic") rather than postmodernist crunchies or agents. Also, they all cooperate to keep competent Enlightenment people out of their organizations. Competent Enlightenment people "rock the boat" to use a 1950's phrase.

    This is why the establishment, including establishment leadership that doesn't believe the dream, can't get rid of Trump. Even the Establishment skeptical leadership that does not believe in the dream still lives off of it. Trump is not in the dream, the Establishment cannot leave the dream. Trump is a creature of reality (like another divine or lucky fool: the protagonist in _Idiocracy_) . The dreamers can't do more than dream, Trump is metaphorically the cold hillside upon which the dreamers fear to wake. Eventually, either the hillside wins and the dreamers wake, or else the dreamers die in their sleep, possibly with a bit of help.

    So here we sit, surrounded by dreamers, maybe we dream a bit ourselves. Many of the dreamers murmur insults as they sleep. Some of them sleepwalk and have a nasty tendency to mob, and so have to be avoided; perhaps they are the archetypes of zombies. Others just sort of lie there and smile. And there are others who don't dream, Morlocks to the Eloi. And Damn, but this hillside is cold!

    Counterinsurgency


    1] Joe Bunting.
    "The Most Important Character Archetype"
    https://thewritepractice.com/the-fool-2/

    2] Danna Heller.
    "Holy Fools, Secular Saints, and illiterate Saviors in American Literature and Popular Culture".
    Purdue University, 2003.
    ISSN 1481-4374.

    3] Viktor Suvarov et. al.
    _Icebreaker_
    1988.
    Suvarov makes a very good case. See his presentation at the US Naval Academy on Youtube.com.
    https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1193&context=clcweb

    Replies: @m___

    Reply to commenter Counterinsurgency

    As all great thoughts, shaped by words, the toolbox is partly your own customization, a skeleton to grasp and capture the essential. Another tool is “jumps”, you made a few lock-steps ones. Associative thinking at it’s best!

    Our tangent, reading is faster then writing, listening is slower then reading, then again speaking beats writing.
    From these a lot can be explored as to the who-is of the listener and the writer or speaker alike, it explains away part of human behaviour. It might even refer to why the Bible, and the Koran do not have a single clown?

    Back to your logic of things.

    Dreams and clowns.

    Literature, fiction, and actors away from the power “salons”. …To grasp the “dream of the real”, the many, only slight variants, we fellow humans are entwined into. Your tools to explain away the tarball of reality is refreshing. The example to put it to the test, WWII, appropriate, since the scenario runs for over a century.
    Better then fiction.

    Always anew amazing how to get to explore the periphery of the dreams of convention, the comforts of ordinary. These asynchronous, and locationally different live paths, seem to lead a few individuals to the core understandings that are relevant, timely, and …un communicable. Your pathway seems out of the ordinary.

    Again on a tangent, to associate capable individuals, a “potential” elite, to build an in group that matters, could be the core of innovation, the thing AI (a force multiplier of dream inducing), genetics of biology (a possible make-over of the human hardware, not sure if this comes to realize and how, the knowledge part does not match the low side of teaching about it) to throw the dream against…

    Always within your terminology …could produce “the next dream” (as compared to Washington speak of “the next big thing”), standing a chance to make reality better then it’s sublimation. The reverse is tested and true, a reality that needs sublimation to make it comestible, there is no lack of it.

    Ultimately a reduction of the world population, social engineering, at best, if not plain brute, as to individual engineering, is nothing else then another case of dream thinking, regardless of acceptable tools to make the case in practical terms.

    Darwin is probably the most mainstream example of thinking out of the blue, the dream, and being pulled into science. There should indeed be some out of the blue, “ex-nihilo”, conceptualizing, and it needs majoring comprehension, a rewiring of “elite” and “public” alike. You made a best case for dreaming.

    As for us, having tasted a glimpse of your express venue ways, they stand!

    “Damn, but this hillside is cold!”

  • @peterAUS
    Probably O.T. but, here it goes:
    I see people here commenting on "m___" posts, or better, lack of clarity there.

    Be that as it may, I've, personally, found quite interesting insights and ideas there.

    I don't mind his posts. Definitely prefer them to, say......70 % of comments/commentators around.
    All you, who don't like his posts, need to do is just put him on ignore list. Or, if feeling charitable, skim through his writings. I do it for those 70 % all the time.

    Hehe..free speech goes well with free ignoring.
    Beats censorship, all the time.

    Replies: @m___, @m___

    Thanks, Peter.

  • @peterAUS
    Probably O.T. but, here it goes:
    I see people here commenting on "m___" posts, or better, lack of clarity there.

    Be that as it may, I've, personally, found quite interesting insights and ideas there.

    I don't mind his posts. Definitely prefer them to, say......70 % of comments/commentators around.
    All you, who don't like his posts, need to do is just put him on ignore list. Or, if feeling charitable, skim through his writings. I do it for those 70 % all the time.

    Hehe..free speech goes well with free ignoring.
    Beats censorship, all the time.

    Replies: @m___, @m___

    The above is not a bad analysis, and applies to the failure of the Soviet Union. It is expressed in fairly complex English syntax, and much of it is allusion.

    It does not entirely describe the present situation, however.

    Till there, we concur, and thanks for pasting some coherence back onto the initial comment. Again, to “understand” an argument, the explaining, and the capacity to absorb of the audience is almost a half – half equation. The general strategy used by public writing is to bow to the latter, thus taking out all added value and bow to convention “with a twist”. If one prefers, public writing is about page-views, Patreon, selling out at the right moment and time to some opportunistic worldview. Not envisioning anything in a “new” way, adding some insight out of the conventional, elaborate status-quo.

    As to the second part of your comment, below “present situation”, we cannot stat, this needs more discussion, and background. “Are you capable to put some coherence of your own?”. Glad to have your quality comment attached to ours.

  • @Counterinsurgency
    @m___

    I believe that a summary would be as follows:
    a) Existing theories of government (and society, for that matter) does not fit existing fact of government.
    b) Measurements that existing theory of government says should be crucial(GDP) are no longer crucial (e.g. GDP does not measure displacement of base population).
    c) Governments realize this, and falsify the formerly crucial (but now almost useless) statistics to achieve secondary goals (e.g.: influence elections, enhance international prestige).
    d) Falsification is widely recognized, but many people make a living from their knowledge of existing theory and of the underlying real system (economists, judges, social commentators, some politicians, recipients of tax funds etc.). These people are unlikely to change their minds, and talking to them is a waste of time.
    e) However, many people are hurt by the absence of a predictive social theory (or, "a social theory that fits the actual society"). These people do not support the existing theory.
    f) Many people who make a living from their knowledge of the system and of system theory support the system weakly, and would abandon it if funding were lost.
    g) If the specialists in (f) abandon the existing theory, it will have no supporters left.

    The above is not a bad analysis, and applies to the failure of the Soviet Union. It is expressed in fairly complex English syntax, and much of it is allusion.

    It does not entirely describe the present situation, however.
    1) A large group, the Postmodernists, have adopted a coherent set of beliefs (those of the Counter-Enlightenment) and are using these arguments to defeat organized resistance to Marxism. (see: Hicks, _Explaining postmodernism_. This group is somewhat like the Bolsheviks, but is an establishment rather than a revolutionary party, is familiar to the public, seems to be losing internal structure, and has been rejected by much of the US base population.
    2) The Postmodernist/Marxists have imported or created (that's what "neighborhood organizers" do) quite a allied groups that oppose the Enlightenment. Pretty much all of these groups also oppose Marxism and the Counter-Enlightenment as well as the Enlightenment. They are also opposed to the Postmodernists (Christians or post-Christians and Jews) on ethnic grounds. Each allied group apparently intends to displace the other allied groups after, or perhaps a bit before, their coalition gains office.

    This complicates the situation. The Marxists see parallels with the USSR's October Revolution, but do not see that that they are far worse organized than the Bolsheviks, and that their allies are far better organized than the Russian base population of AD 1917. Each of their allies also sees a parallel from its history and overlooks its weaknesses.

    Should the Postmodernists / Marxist led coalition actually gain control of the Federal Government, contention between allies will cause serious problems. It is said in defense of Anarchy that "Anarchy isn't very good, but it's better than no government at all.", which is a way of saying that anything is better than anarchy. Some form of government has, thus far, always emerged after anarchy.

    Globally, disorganization in the US would cause serious problems. The most serious would be severe reduction in trade as the US ceases to police the world's ocean trade routes and ceases to provide a global currency.

    Counterinsurgency

    Replies: @peterAUS, @m___

    The above is not a bad analysis, and applies to the failure of the Soviet Union. It is expressed in fairly complex English syntax, and much of it is allusion.

    It does not entirely describe the present situation, however.

    Till there, we concur, and thanks for pasting some coherence back onto the initial comment. Again, to “understand” an argument, the explaining, and the capacity to absorb of the audience is almost a half – half equation. The general strategy used by public writing is to bow to the latter, thus taking out all added value and bow to convention “with a twist”. If one prefers, public writing is about page-views, Patreon, selling out at the right moment and time to some opportunistic worldview. Not envisioning anything in a “new” way, adding some insight out of the conventional, elaborate status-quo.

    As to the second part of your comment, below “present situation”, we cannot stat, this needs more discussion, and background. “Are you capable to put some coherence of your own?”. Glad to have your quality comment attached to ours.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
    @m___

    Writing is hard!!! I don't do it all that well, either.

    I sometimes think that all public writing is a form of fantasy. That's one reason I look to science fiction -- it's obviously not about any observable reality. Same with anime -- clearly not about humans as they can be seen in daily life. Reduces the chance that I'll get entrained by the fiction and confuse it with reality. Of course, it also means I'm caught up in the archetypes that both fictional forms use and re-use.

    Public writing is yet another form of fantasy, even when it is seriously meant to be about reality. You mention the audience as a serious part of public writing, and I'm in full agreement. The public writer writes about precisely those things that are _not_ part of the public's daily experiences. The public is thus unable to judge the veracity of the public writer's works. (Example -- the public's assumption that "everybody is all right, really" and that "They're all crooked", which combine to assume that those in the public eye commit only venal sins). This can coax the public writer to describe a reality in which only venal sins are being committed, although the real sins are monstrous (e.g. committing war crimes on a large scale).

    Taking that as a starting point, let's try for more discussion and background, as you suggest. Here's more of something that might be discussion and background:

    I've looked behind the curtain a few times, not many, but enough to see a pattern. Universities (high and low end, research and teaching), NASA, news media, DOD, software, the Moral Majority, etc. In each case the formal and public goals, the exoteric goals, of the organization were not the esoteric goals of the organization. The esoteric goals were always the same: survival.
    A paraphrase from one of Laumer's Retief stories captured it nicely:
    Anonymous Embassy staff member: "Well, if we're not on the alien's side, and we're not on our public's side, whose side are we on?"
    Ambassador Oldtrick: "Our own, of course."

    The US after WW II fits the "lucky fool" [1] or the "holy fool" [2] depending on how you want to look at it. It appears, as Ron Unz has pointed out, that WW II was the result of a grand strategic plan initiated by Lenin and brought to fruition by Stalin. The basic plan was to have the West re-fight WW I, completely ruin itself, and be reorganized by the Red Army. Under this plan, Hitler was a catspaw, who was handed Germany by a deliberate Communist defeat, and who was set up by the Soviet offer of Polish partition. Hitler was, of course, his own grand strategist, and a fairly good one. Good enough, in fact, to spoil Stalin's plan by striking about two weeks before Stalin would have [3]. Hitler attacks about a year too late to win, but just in time to kill enough Soviet troops that Stalin only conquers half of Europe, and Russia is bled so dry that it accomplishes nothing more than gradual decay after Hitler's, emerging only in the early 2000s still not completely recovered from WW II.

    In the meantime, over the Atlantic, FDR was also playing Grand Strategist. He started re-arming during the early New Deal. Without that preparation, which put in place the capital goods and shipyards needed for rapid expansion, the US Navy could not have prevailed in both Atlantic and Pacific during WW II. FDR took quite a few other steps to prepare. So did the War Department, which moved fighting officers into command slots before the US entered WW II. Other than a program of "preparedness", support for the UK, and opposition to Japan, FDR seems to have had no plan other than to engage and defeat the enemy. He couldn't even do that quickly or easily -- and Imperial Japan not bombed Pearl Harbor, and if Hitler hadn't declared war on the US, the us might just have stayed out of WW II.

    So: Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, all played Grand Strategist. All lost heavily, usully through idiotic oversights: Lenin -- expanding the Bolsheviki with Russian natives, who took over. Stalin: making an army that was all offense and no defense, then ignoring Wehrmacht preparations to attack. Hitler: establishing a welfare state that depended on robbing one group to enrich another, but not building the military force to rob on the scale needed, but instead relying on bluff. Mussolini: believing that the Italian Army was a first class fighting force. The only winner was FDR, who won by a timing that was the result of US reluctance to go to war, and of course on building capital goods first, then weapons. Stalin had also emphasized capital goods first, then war, but it hadn't saved him.

    In short, FDR was a middling Grand Strategist, but he was also lucky.

    But try to tell the US public that, and try telling the US leadership that. Hubris reigned back then, and it still does.

    It's like the US emerged from WW II in a dream (look at Disney's work back then), one that needn't be backed up by reality because reality was the Cold War, a USSR with nuclear weapons and (although we didn't know it) a keen sense of the bluff. Better to stay in the dream and pretend (hope) that the system established during WW II would again save us. I've heard Edwardian England (right before WW I) compared to a dream, and I'm comparing the US to a dream in the same way.

    Many in the US are still in the same dream, supporting the establishment. However, most organizations are not in the dream. They are instead exploiting it. Part of the dream was that the US could defeat Communism by converting everybody to the free market, or something similar. To dream that, one had to believe that everybody was potentially a Westerner, with the Western set of abilities and interests. It seemed, back then, as if the alternatives were (a) Dreaming a belief in identical capabilities or (b) waging thermonuclear central war. The US picked dreaming, and many are still picking dreaming, even if the dream is getting a nightmare tinge.

    There were groups that did not pick the dream. These groups instead exploited it. The New Left essentially threatened to destroy the post-WW II dream if they were not put in power, and to continue the dream if they were put in power. A good part of the Postmodernist power today is that anti-realism and anti-individualism implies that one can live in a dream (there is no reality, so everything is a bit like a dream) without being responsible for the choice (because groups make choices, and the nonexistent individual doesn't and can't) or risking the end of the dream (no reality). All that is required is to be nice (favor an egalitarian society) and quiet (check your privilege).

    And that's pretty much what I've seen. Quite a few of these group managers think of themselves as suborned dreamers (as "being realistic") rather than postmodernist crunchies or agents. Also, they all cooperate to keep competent Enlightenment people out of their organizations. Competent Enlightenment people "rock the boat" to use a 1950's phrase.

    This is why the establishment, including establishment leadership that doesn't believe the dream, can't get rid of Trump. Even the Establishment skeptical leadership that does not believe in the dream still lives off of it. Trump is not in the dream, the Establishment cannot leave the dream. Trump is a creature of reality (like another divine or lucky fool: the protagonist in _Idiocracy_) . The dreamers can't do more than dream, Trump is metaphorically the cold hillside upon which the dreamers fear to wake. Eventually, either the hillside wins and the dreamers wake, or else the dreamers die in their sleep, possibly with a bit of help.

    So here we sit, surrounded by dreamers, maybe we dream a bit ourselves. Many of the dreamers murmur insults as they sleep. Some of them sleepwalk and have a nasty tendency to mob, and so have to be avoided; perhaps they are the archetypes of zombies. Others just sort of lie there and smile. And there are others who don't dream, Morlocks to the Eloi. And Damn, but this hillside is cold!

    Counterinsurgency


    1] Joe Bunting.
    "The Most Important Character Archetype"
    https://thewritepractice.com/the-fool-2/

    2] Danna Heller.
    "Holy Fools, Secular Saints, and illiterate Saviors in American Literature and Popular Culture".
    Purdue University, 2003.
    ISSN 1481-4374.

    3] Viktor Suvarov et. al.
    _Icebreaker_
    1988.
    Suvarov makes a very good case. See his presentation at the US Naval Academy on Youtube.com.
    https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1193&context=clcweb

    Replies: @m___

  • The parallels between British and American politics are simply eerie. In 2016, after British voters unexpectedly rebelled against their political class and chose to leave the European Union, Donald J. Trump took to calling himself Mr. Brexit—and guess what? Since then, of course, the political classes in both countries have been conspiring to reverse the...
  • None of this should be a surprise. The sad truth: the central political question in all Western societies is—how far will the masses be able to control the naturally-abusive tendencies of the elite?

    Best conclusion possible, a needed conclusion to make sense of all and anything. Logical consequence, real journalism, media is meant to reverse engineer the layers of deceit imposed by any local power elites where-ever on the globe. That means independent financing, independent organizing, having more analytical and synthetical ability then the power elites, and steering the output over covert channels where the analysis can be put into action. Real guerilla war tactics.

    Consequently again, real decisions will be global, regardless, whether the concerned decision makers are the commoner or the elites. Such a shame that the French intent on speaking truth to power is not seen in this light by the global masses. Should we say, “the deplorable thinks “local”, the elites think “global”.

    Another consequence is the answer as to the potential of the local elites all over the globe, to quality steering. Not much, not well coordinated, big derivatives, restricted variables control. Seems the only thing the elites of power are capable of is beating the slur of the deplorables. “Man beats man, but cannot thump it’s nose as to the wider environment.” No value in historical models any longer, call them folklore. Post-history has arrived indeed,

    • Replies: @peterAUS
    @m___

    Pretty much.

    Especially:


    Logical consequence, real journalism, media is meant to reverse engineer the layers of deceit imposed by any local power elites where-ever on the globe. That means independent financing, independent organizing, having more analytical and synthetical ability then the power elites, and steering the output over covert channels where the analysis can be put into action. Real guerilla war tactics.
    Consequently again, real decisions will be global, regardless, whether the concerned decision makers are the commoner or the elites.
     
    And, especially, my bold:

    ...such a shame that the French intent on speaking truth to power is not seen in this light by the global masses. Should we say, “the deplorable thinks “local”, the elites think “global”.
     
    The crux of the matter.
    Well, there have been some (weak) initiatives. Bannon recently in Europe, for example. But, true, too little.

    You know, that idea of yours you've mentioned here several times so far (hehe...and which most here simply didn't register...) IS good.
    You'd expect that to already work in fact. Today's technology can do it in a couple of months.
    And, that is interesting. I am sure that local elites are aware of that and know it. And, yet, they, obviously, haven't done anything about it. Makes you think, a?

    My theory: uncomfortable, for the lower strata (around 60 % of society). Elites always stick to each other more than to their local masses. Class thing I am afraid. A fellow named Marx mentioned that a while ago.
    Actually............was happening before too (before capitalism, that is).
    Joan of Arc, William Wallace etc.

    Too much of power of the masses, well, could very well erode, even take away the power of local elites.

    Bottom line, your idea is a very good tool.
    But, we still lack a good vision.

    Hehe...hope I made some sense.
  • Back in November I published a long column discussing the results of the 2018 midterm elections and then a couple of weeks ago I also released a private letter I'd distributed to prominent figures in the Alt-Right movement back in 2017, suggesting some of the ways that their public positions had severely damaged their credibility...
  • @Thomm
    @follyofwar


    The big problem with bringing in only skilled immigrants with no cap is that it causes a brain drain on those countries losing their smartest citizens – the ones who could most help them if they stayed at home.
     
    I never believed that. The quality of a political regime matters (otherwise the GDR would have been as prosperous as the FRG, and North Korea would be as good as South Korea). A skilled person should have the right to take his business elsewhere.

    Plus, we care about our country first and foremost. Why not take the best (I wish we could dump the worst, but we can't).

    Remember that another country will still take them (Canada, Australia, etc.), so they will still leave their original country.

    Replies: @m___

    Remember that another country will still take them (Canada, Australia, etc.), so they will still leave their original country.

    Global problems are hard to solve by thinking US. The main flaw of the article.

  • @Tulip
    This article misses important dimensions of the immigration issue:

    1.) The Wall is symbolic, akin to making MLK Jr. a national holiday, for the Anti-Immigration crowd. Political groups will expend enormous political capital to win symbolic victories. The belief is probably that the symbol will result in better treatment and attention to their issues and constituents.

    2.) Because the Wall is symbolic and ultimately related to the Civil Religion, it is being advocated for on religious/theological grounds relating to social purity. For the Anti-Immigration crowd, America's purity is being sullied by the demonic powers of darkness secretly invading through our porous borders. For the Immigration crowd, America's purity is being sullied by the demonic powers of darkness festering in rural non-coastal areas in places of ignorance and blight. Both groups seek ritual exorcism, and exorcism from outsiders, but define outsiders differently. If you don't understand the dispute as essentially religious, you might take the theological pronouncements to be bad public policy arguments. [If we removed Emma Lazarus's poem from the Statute of Liberty, it would do nothing about immigration levels either, but you would see an even more intense theological argument.]

    3.) The real immigration issue is that if you import low-skill workers with no sense of connection to the ethnic majority and its heritage and traditions, they will be dependent on government benefits and won't be pulled into the politics of racial/ethnic resentment on sale on the Right.

    4.) Accordingly, they will overwhelmingly vote Democratic and if enough of them come, they will inevitably shift the politics to the extreme left. Of course, what that means exactly in the long-term is unclear, but the kind of Ronald Reagan 1980's conservative-style is dead due to demographics.

    5.) Resistance to immigration on the part of Right-wingers is the tactical response to this threat. Of course, the business lobby is more than happy to import cheap labor, so the Right is not being effectual, but it is short-term thinkers with big checks looking three years out on their business plan versus long-term thinkers considering generational effects.

    Replies: @m___

    This article misses important dimensions of the immigration issue:

    Indeed. Some more arguments, to consider, to be influencing any immigration strategy. The long term, of course, the planetary situation, a global population beyond allowable limits, a need for industrial work-forces shrinking below a fraction of work forces offered. Global financialization. The disregard of “bright” individuals for systemic and conceptual, goal seeking strategies, aloft from historical models and out of “ex nihilo”. As sophisticated as the article might be, by omission, rather binary.

    In the first place, can the US territory at all be considered as a viable political entity, since the variables that constitute it’s composure are to be found outside of it’s borders, outside of it’s influence. Immigration might be best tweaked by solving and tweaking global variables. Immigration to the US, is a minor issue. Causation from an untenable, quality wise, and growing out of proportions, global population is one of the majoring issues.

  • A recurring theme here is that Jews in America are either going to have throw in with the Heritage American whites they've long despised--if Heritage America will have them--or face the brown invasion in isolation. Despite Jews' best efforts, the POC ascendancy increasingly not only denies them claim to victim status, it views them as...
  • The graph.

    Globbing Whites, and globbing Jews along age, without consideration for class and gender pulled in the picture, means little.

    The Jew stances change, has started by WASP-elites, selling out to Jew money power. A Jew being a Jew, he will see opportunity into the “other” side. Of course that effect propagating into the younger generations first. It is a matter of base short-term opportunities, to bet both sides in politics. How will the Jew troll along his long-term instincts of in-group behavior? Probably by marrying into and mixing with the conservative side on the basis of Jew male and Gentile bride for the elites, and the middle class Jew soliciting that newer power group for opportunity.

    Changes are taking place, not to be interpreted in the suggested way.

  • Today’s world of higher education is not especially notable for miracles. But I am happy to report of one such miracle—the transformation of diversity from an academic liability to an asset of near incalculable benefit. That this transformation occurred in the space of a few decades and cost only a few million, makes it especially...
  • @anarchyst
    @m___

    It’s not “smarts” or “IQ” that gives jews an advantage over gentile whites, but is their rabid insistence on cultural and social cohesiveness, insularity and nepotism (but only for themselves) that gives them an “advantage”. This same cultural and social cohesiveness that is prized so highly by jewish interests is denied to gentile whites. Jews, to a man will fight to deny this same cultural and social cohesiveness to gentile whites that they themselves enjoy as it is a major part of the jewish purpose–the destruction of gentile white culture, which IS superior to any jewish cultural or social society. If jews did not possess this power, they would most likely be rag merchants, liquor merchants, or furniture merchants–nothing more. As I have previously stated, jewish success is based on cultural and social cohesiveness and insularity–NOT “smarts” or “IQ”. Once enough jews get into a position of power in the work world or education systems, they will hire and promote their own, bypassing more qualified gentile white candidates.
    Jews have latched on to cultural cohesiveness and nepotism, as it serves their purpose exceedingly well.
    At the same time, jews pushed the concept of racial “equality”, (but only for gentile whites), backing it up with “civil-rights” and “equal accommodation” laws which are enforced by governments—in the United States, at the point of bayonets–but only against whites. These “civil-rights” laws are used as a “battering ram” against gentile whites to diffuse and fragment any semblance of gentile white solidarity and cohesiveness that may arise.
    A great reckoning dealing with the jews is coming. As gentile whites become more marginalized, the accusation of being tagged as “racist” or a “holocaust denier” is rapidly losing its “sting”.
    Increasingly, jews are more wary of being “called out” and recognized as “jews”. One can call a jew a shyster, shylock, bankster, criminal or ne-er-do-well, and it will roll off his back like water off a duck, BUT call a jew a “jew” and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”.

    Replies: @jilles dykstra, @m___, @atlantis_dweller, @m___, @Moses

    In our opinion, denouncing does not cut it. In a practical sense, since the playing field is trip-wired, the Jew does not play along by the rules (nor does any other group, most have in-group attitudes, including the “old-boys” networks), the suggestion should be that Whites who matter should adhere to some Jew method and sense, and shelve the guilt, strive for equality, the ideas in short of Christianity and Enlightenment (theoretically superior most probably), until they get back to dominance.

    An yet, here we are, “subscriptions” to a Jew cluster to express findings that contradict the very basis of reasonable opposition. All reproaches made to the Jew, the international Jew, stealth with regard to his individual identity, his outcry as a collective, on command, and proven age-old tactics, his in-group handling of internal problems, should be rather adopted.

    The secondary problems, White trash, a middle class, whoring as never, as long as White elites can come to some coherent strategy, the latter problems will not surpass the givens and strive within the Jewish group.

  • I think there is a rule in the application of science in medical settings: the first big step is taken by the person least suitable to take it. Consider, for example, the first heart transplant. It was carried out by a showman surgeon who jumped the gun and did the operation before the problem of...
  • @Santoculto
    The SIGNIFICANT lack of reasonable levels of RATIONALITY among GREAT MAJORITY of people/humans, at least 70% of people, is basically ignored... and it's, like it or not, fundamental.

    thanks again ''higher iq'' people, and its masters, capitalism or any other ideology which nurture your fundamental alienation: ''knowledge by knowledge''.

    Replies: @m___

    In all, your emotional disdain, your disdain of emotion in producing knowledge. As across the body of your comments.

    You are on to something, many times over, the world needs more of your mindset. When success is a numbers game, what matters is lonely. You must be ignored, hated at the best, and that does not matter.

  • I am among the few to have had the good fortune of growing up in France. I did know that most of the world was poorer than my country and that some people in far away and not-so-far away lands were still dying in wars. But talk of “globalization” was already all the rage and...
  • @phil
    @m___

    Are you able to write coherently, or are you just lazy?

    Replies: @m___

    Are you able to write coherently, or are you just lazy?

    Since some frameworks are bigger then others, coherence is a relative thing. If you prefer, it is often not the argument, but the audience that matters or in most cases, not at all. Or, to put it differently, when a reader turns “fish-eye”, is it the writer at stake?

    We suggest to glance at or scan partly, our commenting body, the bits of text it relates to (often not very coherent, pertinent, complete or relevant in the first place), and start talking coherence from there.

    As always, our compliments, it is a daring thing to be outspoken, but one cannot well judge the man by the single comment. As some-one else posted these same days, “You are so startlingly moronic”. That to us suggesting a homogeneous state of mind, be it inclined to the downside.

    • Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
    @m___

    I hate to pile on but I'm honestly not sure whether you are a schizophrenic or a pathetic recent product of our dysfunctional educational system. What you write makes little sense to me and, I suspect, to almost anyone who tries to parse it. I'm not attacking your ideas but only the inchoate incoherence of your posts I can't attack your ideas because quite frankly, after reading what you've posted here, I have no idea what those ideas might be.

    Replies: @Alfa158, @Rogue, @Anonymous

    , @RudyM
    @m___

    So that would be a "no," then, to the question of whether or not you are able to write coherently.

    , @jbwilson24
    @m___

    I wager that this execrable prose is the product of Google translate or some other form of machine learning based translation system. Something about it strikes me as decidedly mechanical.

    , @Stephen Paul Foster
    @m___

    m, perhaps, is attempting a parody of Judith Butler or Jacques Derrida.

    , @cassandra
    @m___

    Agree with jbwilson24: probably a bot.

  • Today’s world of higher education is not especially notable for miracles. But I am happy to report of one such miracle—the transformation of diversity from an academic liability to an asset of near incalculable benefit. That this transformation occurred in the space of a few decades and cost only a few million, makes it especially...
  • @Whitewolf
    @m___

    Whites selling out their own people are traitors. Having disdain for lower class Whites is acceptable. Selling them out is not.

    Replies: @m___

    To a certain extend, there will be distinctions between Whites, of course, what deems as being impossible is to provide within the existing methodologies and historical models for an eight billion plus global population. There will not be ongoing development, but convergence to the bottom as can be seen. The choice is going to be qualitative, what will prevail, as a solid, durable base to build upon. Nations, religion, class, or race. The elites of today bet on class, a global ruling class and consequently a global ghetto for the deplorable, the all-color proletarians, the whatever religeous zealots, the consumer zumby (a living dead consumer). They succeeded pretty well.

    The alternative to a ghetto existence, within the confines of pollution, toxicity, veganism and crappy housing for the commoner might be to bet on race, call the elites out on loyalty to their own on the basis of race. Very Jewish, and illustrative to the negative as done by Blacks.

    The commoner cannot tolerate his own elites selling out, and this without regard for nation borders. That is what the Whites of the middle class and the straight thinking outliers at the bottom are up against.

  • I am among the few to have had the good fortune of growing up in France. I did know that most of the world was poorer than my country and that some people in far away and not-so-far away lands were still dying in wars. But talk of “globalization” was already all the rage and...
  • The underlying yardstick, being GDP, what a joke? The author’s mind of measure, that is where all should start. It seems to us that the author’s champions are pulling the periphery into further decay.

    His measures of success seem to be contradicted by the moment in history. Linearity has stopped, Fukushima of Harvard funded, was right minus “linear”. The end of linear history has happened indeed, hence the conventional measuring stick, and the tricking of the statistics, even at their own defined values by ditto champions, can be thrown out. To pick a single bone… by their own rules and intentions, the EU playing fair?

    We are sorry to see so many intellectuals into this kind of groove thinking, trying to capitalize on the lie they absorbed with zest over their carreer, and now see no alternative but to persist out of opportunism. Some data present must raise the question of foul play, do they not? …so many conventional dogmas must raise a doubt in the most average of minds or not?

    To make a case against such nonsense means getting blue in the face.

    • Replies: @phil
    @m___

    Are you able to write coherently, or are you just lazy?

    Replies: @m___

    , @jamie b.
    @m___

    Was that even English?

    Replies: @apollonian

    , @Counterinsurgency
    @m___

    I believe that a summary would be as follows:
    a) Existing theories of government (and society, for that matter) does not fit existing fact of government.
    b) Measurements that existing theory of government says should be crucial(GDP) are no longer crucial (e.g. GDP does not measure displacement of base population).
    c) Governments realize this, and falsify the formerly crucial (but now almost useless) statistics to achieve secondary goals (e.g.: influence elections, enhance international prestige).
    d) Falsification is widely recognized, but many people make a living from their knowledge of existing theory and of the underlying real system (economists, judges, social commentators, some politicians, recipients of tax funds etc.). These people are unlikely to change their minds, and talking to them is a waste of time.
    e) However, many people are hurt by the absence of a predictive social theory (or, "a social theory that fits the actual society"). These people do not support the existing theory.
    f) Many people who make a living from their knowledge of the system and of system theory support the system weakly, and would abandon it if funding were lost.
    g) If the specialists in (f) abandon the existing theory, it will have no supporters left.

    The above is not a bad analysis, and applies to the failure of the Soviet Union. It is expressed in fairly complex English syntax, and much of it is allusion.

    It does not entirely describe the present situation, however.
    1) A large group, the Postmodernists, have adopted a coherent set of beliefs (those of the Counter-Enlightenment) and are using these arguments to defeat organized resistance to Marxism. (see: Hicks, _Explaining postmodernism_. This group is somewhat like the Bolsheviks, but is an establishment rather than a revolutionary party, is familiar to the public, seems to be losing internal structure, and has been rejected by much of the US base population.
    2) The Postmodernist/Marxists have imported or created (that's what "neighborhood organizers" do) quite a allied groups that oppose the Enlightenment. Pretty much all of these groups also oppose Marxism and the Counter-Enlightenment as well as the Enlightenment. They are also opposed to the Postmodernists (Christians or post-Christians and Jews) on ethnic grounds. Each allied group apparently intends to displace the other allied groups after, or perhaps a bit before, their coalition gains office.

    This complicates the situation. The Marxists see parallels with the USSR's October Revolution, but do not see that that they are far worse organized than the Bolsheviks, and that their allies are far better organized than the Russian base population of AD 1917. Each of their allies also sees a parallel from its history and overlooks its weaknesses.

    Should the Postmodernists / Marxist led coalition actually gain control of the Federal Government, contention between allies will cause serious problems. It is said in defense of Anarchy that "Anarchy isn't very good, but it's better than no government at all.", which is a way of saying that anything is better than anarchy. Some form of government has, thus far, always emerged after anarchy.

    Globally, disorganization in the US would cause serious problems. The most serious would be severe reduction in trade as the US ceases to police the world's ocean trade routes and ceases to provide a global currency.

    Counterinsurgency

    Replies: @peterAUS, @m___

  • Today’s world of higher education is not especially notable for miracles. But I am happy to report of one such miracle—the transformation of diversity from an academic liability to an asset of near incalculable benefit. That this transformation occurred in the space of a few decades and cost only a few million, makes it especially...
  • @jilles dykstra
    @m___

    Quite sorry, read it twice, but the mud remains.
    Possibly just white inferiority.

    Replies: @m___

    Quite sorry but the mud remains…

    Glanced over your comment body, some very interesting hind-sights on historical sources.

  • @anarchyst
    @m___

    It’s not “smarts” or “IQ” that gives jews an advantage over gentile whites, but is their rabid insistence on cultural and social cohesiveness, insularity and nepotism (but only for themselves) that gives them an “advantage”. This same cultural and social cohesiveness that is prized so highly by jewish interests is denied to gentile whites. Jews, to a man will fight to deny this same cultural and social cohesiveness to gentile whites that they themselves enjoy as it is a major part of the jewish purpose–the destruction of gentile white culture, which IS superior to any jewish cultural or social society. If jews did not possess this power, they would most likely be rag merchants, liquor merchants, or furniture merchants–nothing more. As I have previously stated, jewish success is based on cultural and social cohesiveness and insularity–NOT “smarts” or “IQ”. Once enough jews get into a position of power in the work world or education systems, they will hire and promote their own, bypassing more qualified gentile white candidates.
    Jews have latched on to cultural cohesiveness and nepotism, as it serves their purpose exceedingly well.
    At the same time, jews pushed the concept of racial “equality”, (but only for gentile whites), backing it up with “civil-rights” and “equal accommodation” laws which are enforced by governments—in the United States, at the point of bayonets–but only against whites. These “civil-rights” laws are used as a “battering ram” against gentile whites to diffuse and fragment any semblance of gentile white solidarity and cohesiveness that may arise.
    A great reckoning dealing with the jews is coming. As gentile whites become more marginalized, the accusation of being tagged as “racist” or a “holocaust denier” is rapidly losing its “sting”.
    Increasingly, jews are more wary of being “called out” and recognized as “jews”. One can call a jew a shyster, shylock, bankster, criminal or ne-er-do-well, and it will roll off his back like water off a duck, BUT call a jew a “jew” and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”.

    Replies: @jilles dykstra, @m___, @atlantis_dweller, @m___, @Moses

    Mostly agree. See our ditto sequel comment on attitudes to be adopted openly, covertly and significantly.

  • @jilles dykstra
    @m___


    our first impression, basically a majority Jew cluster, regardless of the stances promoted. Secondly unz.com being intent on masking this phenomenon to the outsider, while promoting it to the insider
     
    Clear as mud, but I always admire people who know the intentions of other people.

    Replies: @m___

    Clear as mud,

    To scrape away some of the mud, it seems to us that the “problem” should be a simple con-stat.

    Either Whites agree on denouncing the other (Jew, Muslim, Black, Hispanic, Chinese…) his in-group attitudes, which did not, does not work, (it is not hard to agree upon)

    …or Whites step away from ignoring that all other groups do have in-group attitudes, prevailing over family, tribe, class, territory, and religion. These and other factors (age, gender, on a per individual basis) cause endless possibilities of break lines according to any situation, any moment in time. The duck and weave of boxing. Confusing most men-brains into pulp. Including the corrupting of White individuals as straw men drivingJewish in-group interests, away from their prime group interests, since these academics and power players, cannot understand that they thus undermine their long-time credibility and power base (hence Trump-y phenomenons occurring, as certain as climate change). It simply is the Christian roots for one, the Enlightenment another, that equality is a bright light. And it could be, only such a strategy does not work when all other players, play foul.

    Agreeing on deciding that all of the above factors are subject to there own Whiteness as a group foremost (not territory, not class, not religion, not age, not gender) should be a start. Thus leveling the playing field should be the strategy and goal of our Whites that can and would dominantly matter, not denouncing the foul play, but changing the rules. As greed is good in capitalism, one cannot fight in-group attitudes but with equal arms. As to Blacks, Muslims, their in-group attitudes reflect the more primitive extroverts of crime, and breeding wars, less dangerous then the Jewish sophistication of operating media, finance and any key fields that reshuffle society, the social texture and structure of it, in the West. The last strategy as an over-layer, co-opting the more primitive group cohesions of Blacks and name it, is deadly.

    The interesting sub-note, is that Jews between each other submit to any individual abuse as such as secondary to being and belonging as a Jew. The equivalent would be the White Anglo Saxon elites of the US not selling out to the Jewish money power as individuals, regardless of their disdain for the white trash, the deplorable, class phenomena. A touch of Jew is what fails the White middle classes and elites dearly.

    Did we forget to mention the Chinese?

    To get back to the article. The bottom line indeed is talent, White talent. If not present then let’s shop elsewhere. A very Jewish attitude to be adopted by Whites if they want to return to significance.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    @m___

    Quite sorry, read it twice, but the mud remains.
    Possibly just white inferiority.

    Replies: @m___

    , @Whitewolf
    @m___

    Whites selling out their own people are traitors. Having disdain for lower class Whites is acceptable. Selling them out is not.

    Replies: @m___

  • @obwandiyag
    Sorry. Apparently you don't live in the real world. Some black students, in my experience, are smarter and better behaved than many white students. Notice--I said some. All in all, most students white and black, are stupid and badly-behaved.

    Also, I know several black professors who are certainly no dumber than the white professors. Again, not all of them.

    But the real problem is stupidity everywhere. If this chump thinks whites are smart and blacks dumb, he is either lying or dumb himself.

    Replies: @bj, @Tyrion 2, @m___, @swami_cuckenstein, @Anon, @Anon, @Per/Norway, @KWSterling, @TheSadThingIs

    If the article is about statistical truth

    …then the article has it right.

    That has consequences, they should be accepted, on the basis of meritocracy and the common good. It would have been a good thing that academic achievement would cross the lines of group segregation, and cluster around achievement for the exceptions on merit, not emotion, and political shaping. That would mean the occasional Black fully integrated into the majority group of whatever racial group prevails. This sadly is not going to happen outside the working environment, since many other factors define group segregation outside of IQ and academic prowess. As a matter of fact, IQ, academic prowess, is pulled into group environments by the group majority mostly, seldom at the choice of the individual, and it is the group that sets the general score of factoring. IQ does not scale well, academic achievement is a lonely task.

    It seems that also with regard to Jew and White the same phenomenon of in-group first, plays out. Take our cherished unz.com environment, to our first impression, basically a majority Jew cluster, regardless of the stances promoted. Secondly unz.com being intent on masking this phenomenon to the outsider, while promoting it to the insider. We would like to see the “graph” of the larger collaborators and subcontracted services individuals, people involved in it’s financing, with the mention of who is Jewish and who is not. As to the commenters and readers, the peanut gallery, they seem to be dominantly White, above thirty years of age, and just gut feeling, above fifty years of age. Again that makes for in-group attitudes, being different. Christianity could explain that mindset probably.

    Of course that leaves “Jewish” to be defined. Not an easy thing since it seems harder to measure then IQ since there is no definition of “Jew” outside of a pertinent as convenient context, which gives us, admittedly trouble to make any statement. The not clearly defining Jew, being a design feature, not a bug, and not on our side.

    To get back to the piece and it’s author, Robert Weissberg, segregation, a natural defensive mechanism, should be lived with, since it is the broader human nature, and is manifest in all, Black, White, and Jew. The last group in the article conveniently left out.

    Working environments though, as academia, power-circles in general, opinion-makers, should be willing to accept the occasional Black, Jew, or Whitey in the whatever majority defined group supposedly, to collaborate on the basis of higher level opportunism, rationality, best advanced on the basis of merit. unz.com seems to allow for such. On the downside, for every Jewish contributor on unz.com there should not necessarily be a better writer, alas researcher, outside of the group. Making who does the writing, trivial to interchanges. On the upside, even if there were distinct outsiders to the dominating in-group, the kind of writing would make it trivial. Since success is measured in page-views, as such, fringe ideas and detail would hardly correspond to a first necessity.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    @m___


    our first impression, basically a majority Jew cluster, regardless of the stances promoted. Secondly unz.com being intent on masking this phenomenon to the outsider, while promoting it to the insider
     
    Clear as mud, but I always admire people who know the intentions of other people.

    Replies: @m___

    , @anarchyst
    @m___

    It’s not “smarts” or “IQ” that gives jews an advantage over gentile whites, but is their rabid insistence on cultural and social cohesiveness, insularity and nepotism (but only for themselves) that gives them an “advantage”. This same cultural and social cohesiveness that is prized so highly by jewish interests is denied to gentile whites. Jews, to a man will fight to deny this same cultural and social cohesiveness to gentile whites that they themselves enjoy as it is a major part of the jewish purpose–the destruction of gentile white culture, which IS superior to any jewish cultural or social society. If jews did not possess this power, they would most likely be rag merchants, liquor merchants, or furniture merchants–nothing more. As I have previously stated, jewish success is based on cultural and social cohesiveness and insularity–NOT “smarts” or “IQ”. Once enough jews get into a position of power in the work world or education systems, they will hire and promote their own, bypassing more qualified gentile white candidates.
    Jews have latched on to cultural cohesiveness and nepotism, as it serves their purpose exceedingly well.
    At the same time, jews pushed the concept of racial “equality”, (but only for gentile whites), backing it up with “civil-rights” and “equal accommodation” laws which are enforced by governments—in the United States, at the point of bayonets–but only against whites. These “civil-rights” laws are used as a “battering ram” against gentile whites to diffuse and fragment any semblance of gentile white solidarity and cohesiveness that may arise.
    A great reckoning dealing with the jews is coming. As gentile whites become more marginalized, the accusation of being tagged as “racist” or a “holocaust denier” is rapidly losing its “sting”.
    Increasingly, jews are more wary of being “called out” and recognized as “jews”. One can call a jew a shyster, shylock, bankster, criminal or ne-er-do-well, and it will roll off his back like water off a duck, BUT call a jew a “jew” and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”.

    Replies: @jilles dykstra, @m___, @atlantis_dweller, @m___, @Moses

  • The year 2018 will go down in history as a turning point in the evolution of the geostrategic environment of our planet. There are many reasons for that and I won't list them all, but here are some of the ones which I personally consider the most important ones: The Empire blinked. Several times This...
  • @m___
    @peterAUS

    Thanks for one more fun scenario.

    Replies: @peterAUS, @m___

    Agree.

  • As most readers know, I'm not a casual political blogger and I prefer producing lengthy research articles rather than chasing the headlines of current events. But there are exceptions to every rule, and the looming danger of a direct worldwide clash with China is one of them. Consider the arrest last week of Meng Wanzhou,...
  • @gmachine1729
    @AnonFromTN

    I am thinking, would some people here like to form a WeChat group where we can discuss such matters. I am quite busy and I only read and comment on here when on break from work. And it's not all that fun or easy to read many long comments. Like, over the past week, I've been getting long emails from this (white) physicist and I only give him very short replies to a small subset of all he's said. It'd be much easier to do instant messaging, where we can all respond a little at a time.

    If interested, email me at gmachine1729 at foxmail.com.

    Replies: @m___

    “working”

    By giving importance to your job, you must be realizing that almost all of your energy and time is channeled into the system, the elites, whatever their values. And you Sir, are left with your sorry bones in case the systemics are tricked against you. Better decide early on. A part time dissident, often heard of, call it templative minded. Sounds like working for Monsanto, and shopping for biological food to power your exertions.

  • The year 2018 will go down in history as a turning point in the evolution of the geostrategic environment of our planet. There are many reasons for that and I won't list them all, but here are some of the ones which I personally consider the most important ones: The Empire blinked. Several times This...
  • @peterAUS
    @m___


    As it is, any catastrophe is a step toward a possible space to breath.
     
    You could be onto something here.

    The best scenario would be getting just on the brink of the very first nuke deployed, but not further. That "brink" brings the opportunity for real change.

    The next best is just one little tactical nuke on, preferably, command center of sort. That creates the opportunity.

    And, well, the next, not so best, is the first big one obliterating some (minor) city.

    If not stopped there, well, I believe it will go all the way up (or down if you will). Finish with a version "On the Beach".
    End. No breath anymore. For humans, anyway.

    Replies: @m___

    Thanks for one more fun scenario.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
    @m___

    Well, it's really simple, really.

    Is the current situation good for a common person? No.
    Will the common person do something about it? Yes, but of no real importance. These outbursts (Brexit, Trump, "yellow west") don't work, won't work. Or, the proles/serfs aren't happy but the lords don't give a shit. They don't solve the problems; they manage the proles/serfs.
    That's not even important. What is important is that serfs/proles aren't capable of producing a coherent vision, let alone a plan of action for meaningful change for better.
    Even, perhaps, more important, the current system tends to bring on the top, say, peculiar type of people. Not high quality.

    People who are capable of producing a vision/plan still don't care enough. They are good with the system. Will they start caring or will it be to late, hard to say. It's all about "skin in the game".

    And, the system is confrontational. THAT is important.

    The confrontation with those not so quality people on the top, sooner or later, will produce a serious crisis. That "skin in the game".

    What happens after that, nobody knows.

    What a smart person could base his prediction on, is: post-modern man with nuclear weapons isn't a good combination.

    Deep in their hearts Americans (because they are important here) believe in their exceptionalism and if, or when, any crisis happens they'll handle it not only well but to their own benefit. They are so good. No problem there. All of them.

    So, here we are.

    , @m___
    @m___

    Agree.

  • One often sees the silly assertion by right-wing extremists that feminists, social justice warriors, and other “cranks” are enstupidating American education. The purpose, according to these fascists, who are just like Hitler, is “to make historically incompetent groups look competent.” The racism in these absurd claims is obvious. In particular such Neo-Nazis say that mathematical...
  • @anon
    China will completely dominate and destroy the West. All the emerging evidence proves this. Chinese are smart, ethnocentric, nationalist, unified, not cursed with diversity (and not inclined to curse themselves with it), strategically located (despite the common misconception of the USA being strategically located - these oceans will soon become bars on a prison cell), free of white extremist idiocy (SJWs), free of dogmatic economic tribalism (libertarianism and other kooky ideologies), free of most religious self-hating extremists who import immigrants (Catholics, Jews, and Southern Baptists), politically freer than people think, free from the kinds of callout mobs that characterize Twitter, and they have a government that puts the interests of the nation state ahead of the economic elite.

    China has a border and she protects it. China has a culture she doesn't piss away on globalism. China invests in scientific accomplishment and just landed on the dark side of the moon. The USA can't even build a replacement for the shuttle. And what science does now occur in the West is best done in Europe (see the LHC). The US could have had an even larger and more powerful particle accelerator back in the 90s but some idiot congressman turned it down. Pathetic lack of vision.

    An important question at this point is how could people not see this occurrence decades ago? I did. Even here on this site guys would often repeat BS stereotypes about Asians and creativity, free trade, and perpetuated the myth that Japan's failure to "rise" proved that China would meet the same fate (missed observation: "gee, do you think that having nearly 10x the population might lead to a different outcome this time?"), etc. Any day now they said China was going to collapse and 'Murica would rule the world forever; who needs things like industry when we've got tax cuts for the rich? Please. There's even a popular YouTuber who predicted that Japan, not China, would rule Asia - hilariously wrong considering population size differences. The rise of China and my correct predictions of this event as far back as the early and mid 90s should prove beyond doubt that democracy does not work and only a few are truly capable of running society. Pat Buchanan called this, too. He wrote books about this back in the 90s. How in the hell can stupid people not ever see the writing on the wall before it's too late and why are they allowed to vote? Clearly, this is not a problem for some of us...and some nations.

    The USA is an embarrassingly fake nation with a corrupt, inept ruling class and a lazy, uneducated population easily deceived into supporting stupid causes that only end up harming themselves and others. Take the government shutdown for instance. What are republicans doing right now? They are busy making themselves look like complete fools by attacking food stamp recipients, many of whom are white republicans. Way to lose an election next cycle morons. The amount of money wasted on that program pales in comparison to the money spent elsewhere, and many of those on food stamps wouldn't be on them if the government had focused on wage growth instead of exporting our industries and mass importing low wage labor competition!!!!

    Replies: @Simply Simon, @Digital Samizdat, @JLK, @Realist, @Daniel H, @Seraphim, @Anonymous, @gmachine1729, @m___, @Gene Su, @Frankie P, @Anonymous

    Where China goes wrong, is wrong enough as to pull the rest of the globe into the loosers they are, twice over. Environmental dis-concern, growth economics, financialization, are the better tools too wreak havoc. Now it being the Chinese to lead the US, China and Russia doing the dancing, that should represent no matter of substance. Emotion aside, their logic is not new.

    IQ is abhorred, worldwide, when on the right side of the tale (and tail), and out of any local context. Elites as we know, and admire, and on the other side, fringe IQ, do not match smart enough and power of emotion (even politicians have better looks then the aces of math). Using these high IQ critters, as the US does, to build tools to star in dumb systemic scenarios, is what China seems to do better these days. As even Russia does better these days. Again, no matter of substance. A non-situation.

    The sarcasm is off, “the alcoholic does not care, whether it is Whiskey or Whine that kills the liver and spine”. Seriously limited sarcasm, since there is only one side to the whole of the equation: not smart enough.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    @m___

    You are startlingly moronic.