RSSOn the article, the Nomi Prins article in parallel. Since they come close both to the old school boxing “duck and bob” of Cassius, alas Mohammad Ali-Clay
Starting from the premise: before deciding on principle and what to govern for, to show justice and muster achievement… get in charge.
It has shown to be hard to live in a residence where one does not have access to the light switch. The European descend people of the US, are no longer in charge, have not been in charge for a long period of time. To be optimistic, in mind and spirit, at the least the start of the twentieth century shows fully their decay. In their own “homelands” Continental Europe and the Northern Americas they became the under-class and powerless middle class of society. They have only themselves to blame. By complacency they created their parasite elites, the corrupt, rotten core of their own demise.
Jews have been laboring, and continue to do so, to take control, and were successful, they control the money supply, pull the puppets of governance, and play at their whim the credulous and dumbed down “American”, and average French-German-Dutch Westerner (as probably most commoners and middle class scramblers see themselves as Americans). The Russians escaped largely since the cluster around Putin seems capable of bargaining on scale, indeed they have as few grown more expensive, a tighter group to dominate and ridicule. The Chinese are exempt for now, by scaffolding US economics they learned their lesson and made a full U-turn.
The Jewish all-in effort took and takes hard work, and they should be given credit for it. As whatever the situation prescribes ethnic or religious Jews should be grateful to their elites.
However, it is pretty sad, that it takes a Muslim in the US, the alleged land of the free and home of the brave, to just speak out the blatantly obvious facts.
Its a bit like the emperor’s new clothes, where Omar plays the child who says, that the emperor is naked.
All in the public eye is scripted, layers and layers of drab, real power is stealth. Imagine, if one has real ambitions, beyond personal rags to riches, why hunker in Congress? Puppets are on strings, pretty, petty and not.
Again, thanks for peeling the layers of the onion.
Thanks for peeling the onion.
The infinite financial reserves that can be created with a few keystrokes
…then peddled as debt to jacques sheete’s “empty skulls” of the commoner and the thoroughly stumped middle class, completely and persistently incapable to grasp that money and economics is a religion (not that they should be). Once one stops to believe in it, the lure is gone.
When will this end? We see the bubble of shifting theoretical “value” to fewer profiteers as getting more theoretical then real. Pollution, toxicity, ghetto living, a hyper complications rife global systemic will get rid of our elites in their present form. But first the masses, the easy one to accomplish.
Psychology as in refined manipulation, the “hypnosis” of the article, not logic, rational thinking, using variables and parameters that behold their meaning from one scheme to another. Not goal oriented, conceptual thinking beyond immediate interests. That was more of a Socrates.
The Jewish mindset is about ankle biting and when possible swallowing the cow. The humbleness in the process is mind boggling.
Socrates was probably not Jewish, although if you let them… Then he never is published on unz.com, a reference.
In conclusion, I offer an obligatory disclaimer that should go without saying: Obviously Jewish elites are not the only people in the mass hypnosis business. All governments and corporations hypnotize their subjects and personnel into loyal obedience. All religion involves a degree of mass hypnosis; and mysticism, the heart of religion, involves a degree of self-hypnosis. And even parents routinely hypnotize their children to sleep with repetitious storytelling. Some of this, perhaps much of this, is normal and healthy. My point is that Jewish elites have been unusually successful in employing hypnotic mass manipulation for self-aggrandizing purposes, and that today’s Zionist elites are doing so in strikingly immoral and destructive ways.
Best article over the last two years, scope matters, detailed enough, and inducing all of the essential variables needed for understanding the Jewish mindset in all of it’s “biodiversity” . And told so flat footedly, linear a draw, as that of a steam-engine, (intentional beyond doubt), so the ninety nine percent of the unz.com niche public can understand.
Now before we subscribe us to your own “hypnosis”, let’s write our own disclaimer. All of the facets mentioned figure loosely in the eight thousand words of our comments over the last year.
Ilhan Omar, an ambitious wretch, if not, let her come forward on her own terms, and devoid of her elite cognitive manipulators and financing, is an omnipresent example of Jewish manipulation as a method. The “Jewish” approach is applied generously to her, and in parallel, in case of divine provision pointing to some other opportunistic brat, she is the perfect choice of a graphical and sonical to the “pleasure” center of mass commodity Americans.
Another loose thought, hard to grasp apparently here on unz.com, the intro Jewish relationships between the commodity Jew and their proper elites, was well pointed at in the article.
As for WASP elites allowing the rallying (started before the Civil War America) and then take over, “coup d’etat” unbridled, of Jewish elites in academics, politics, Deep State, we give it a ninety to ten bargain quota proportionality. The ninety percent reckons out in ignominious ignorance, profound intellectual numbness, cowardice, drugged on to the “magic” part. Mind, the despise for their own (White commoners) by the “Clintonian” elites, should be seen as a neutral factor, Jewish elites are much harsher in that aspect to their own deplorables. If not for welfare “poor” ethnical Euro-descend Jewish breeders in a city as New-York, would not cluster inside, but spill around the city trash cans.
The “Jewish” exclusive cluster around Ron Unz, his inner circle, then profetizing to the White middle classes is no coincidence of method and tactics.
What is the breaking point of the “Thousand Year Rule”? Probably because of the rational systemic weaknesses in long term thinking, engineering of intelligent progress, measured in enduring solutions that balance to real progress is profoundly unfocused in the Jew mindset. It is all about direct, immediate manipulation, not long term results.
To the “White Elites”, your article is not straight forward, it seems they cannot unlink any longer, the grasp is tight. They must be sensitive to a certain extend that they are profoundly despised in their current ways and shapes, take a Tony Blair as one of the outstanding examples, not only by their own, which was never much an issue for elites anywhere, when contention is still well in place, but by their own masters, the Jewish mind and ethnic-religious omnipresent Jewish elites. That intellectually they compromised their own nature, their genetic and cultural heritage, their ID proper, a history distinct from the historical traject of the Jew is shameful (also shameless). All “handles” are compromised, the Vatican, local governments, the Global Government, the Corporate precursors, a peddler middle class in justice, science, police forces, the military.
The above notes were done in a short burst, so their will be some spell and grammatical errors, we care, but timeliness is a factor. We expect to be shoved to the end of the queue as often the case.
The interests of the de facto elites are distinct from those of the global masses. “Settings” as this weeks Gaza bombings, the New Zealand incident, Jemen bombing of civilians are laboratory experiments of what is possible. Migrations, teasing immigration, while raping and reaping the Third World, Africa in substance, regardless of Chinese, France, the US, but always the global corporate profiteers, are workable tactics, it seems to go un-noticed to the crowds. A game of Real Madrid soccer team attracts more viewers. Any “intellectual” who cannot see through this, is middle class with egotistic interests, scrambling for the crumbs and part of the problem. A traitor.
The emotional discharges as most above, are not very helpful to take on analysis of the essentials, what counts, what is survival in the long term. In case of global elites defunct of any morals, alternative leadership, alternative philosophy, systemic change must be built independently. We should not accent the blame on individuals trying to alter the paradigm. Whether ISIS or now a single White male, they are irrelevant as to the outcome, they count in pointing to what hurts: lack of alternative leadership, sain sustainable global systemics, a need.
fails to achieve: coherent thought and communication.
Our explanation of what IA can and more importantly cannot do, i-s meant to be coherent. If jokingly you pose as not to have noticed, has nothing to debase it.
Repeating algorithms and conditionals, pumping in more variables then a human can glut, are used in anything from biology of genetics, to admittedly, and nefariously the summit of hype, stock exchanges and the US Central Bank.
That's pretty much exactly what this is. It's slightly more sophisticated than shuffling a deck of index cards with Homeric phrases on them.
Now let’s say this is simple, (AI) a library of words, a small language with conditionals as to what can appear where, conditionals of what constitutes the ID of every word
And how would it know which output was correct and what wasn't (ie according to human sensibilities)? It doesn't. The AI has no idea what it's doing.
AI would mean correcting the output, rewrite the library, retry and test the outcome.
And how would it know which output was correct and what wasn’t (ie according to human sensibilities)?
The correct outcome is according to the weight of the words, which acts and accounts for on the basis of the rest of the library. More or less as humans do, in Church what sounds right, is not related to what goes in Congress.
You seem to be missing the important element, what simplifies and predicts better then what human garble ever did – does. When “AI” builds an outcome, it is reproducible, if not there must be a bug.
In the human world the bug is the politician and the weight of the outcome, is attached to the Central Bank, who are the “primitive” of the library used by AI. The difference here is symptomic, the Central Bank algorithm is far more advanced, it changes value pairs according to the weather. Global Warming at work.
That's giving them the benefit of the doubt: It could really be that they are Criminal Elite weaponising migrant invaders to reduce their native populations to poverty and insecurity to strip them of any remaining assets and liberties they had gained since the end of Feudalism.Replies: @Guillaume Durocher, @m___
"The over-educated media-political elites really are weirdos in this respect, completely out of touch with regular people."
That’s giving them the benefit of the doubt: It could really be that they are Criminal Elite weaponising migrant invaders to reduce their native populations to poverty and insecurity to strip them of any remaining assets and liberties they had gained since the end of Feudalism.
Indeed and many other tactics, short term patches for mending will follow. Now understand us right, power politics, the art of the possible to advance elite interests, has not thought this “problem” through.
What is the problem: financial capitalism needs a growing global population ultimately. Well it does not, and the elites do not seem to grasp this. The systemics should change, that would de-stress global populations, rewire them, and ultimately reduce numbers. …To the point where global population numbers are assets again, as hard-wired into the human psychology, and not the liabilities they, the global masses, represent today. Commoners do not instinctively understand this, offer (growing world populations) ultimately diminishes value …to the point of even a twenty seven year old middle class youngster, university educated, becomes a liability. Rewiring the masses is risible. Rewiring the elites, is the only option.
Not climate change (a partial off-shoot) but global human numbers, proportionality and toxicity (derivatives of “heated” financial transactions) will be solved only by paying attention to above. Will this be the twist, and better still, will the U-turn be timely? Well, the hope in the short term of understanding human genetics and it’s biology, and what can be called the precursor of AI, (big data analysis) are about our only hopes.
To be discouraged, the short term patch of Universal Income, to us, for reasons of not coping with the decrease of human creativity per capita. To be discouraged, war, since it has a disproportional impact of derivatives versus outcome, to the point past being obsolete.
This is a comment, a mere hint into possible venueways.
If (AI) can produce this outcome once, it should be repeatable. Now let’s say this is simple, (AI) a library of words, a small language with conditionals as to what can appear where, conditionals of what constitutes the ID of every word, could be more then one(?), …then this is not what should be understood as AI. AI would mean correcting the output, rewrite the library, retry and test the outcome. That would be when done, even a single cycle, and fed the same input primitive worthy of AI denomination. Not done, not yet.
The good thing, when data are fed to a machine, and the blobs can be huge compared to the possible amount “digestible” to a human mind, and the algorithms and libraries ( instructions a a ream, sort of a sophisticated dictionary), the outcome should be identical. If not that would be called a “bug”. And to be ment. In the case of AI by the machine, in the case of above text by human interference.
Where as a human processor, would come up with different outcomes unpredictably, a design feature, applauded in politicians and actors (same breed, though actors tend to be better looking), a machine would be persistent in making the “mistake” consequently. So yes, data research is meaningful. And AI is nonexistent by above definition as of yet. Reservations made, who knows some obscure Count processed Dracula, time is a factor.
That's pretty much exactly what this is. It's slightly more sophisticated than shuffling a deck of index cards with Homeric phrases on them.
Now let’s say this is simple, (AI) a library of words, a small language with conditionals as to what can appear where, conditionals of what constitutes the ID of every word
And how would it know which output was correct and what wasn't (ie according to human sensibilities)? It doesn't. The AI has no idea what it's doing.
AI would mean correcting the output, rewrite the library, retry and test the outcome.
On Italy, Salvini,
Not the complete package, nor can “Italy” as a territory be elevated to international action. But seen the total context. Salvini, the better bet for now.
The real problem of migration ( as some eloquent commenter mentions the in AND the out), is global populations, proportionality of global populations, both inferred from the global financial system ultimately. If the subject stays taboo, there is no generational solution in view.
Africa, is the hunting grounds, many things are consequences, and have their causes in European and Russian, US and Chinese interferences. That is not to say that there should be none, but the globalism in reflected reality is far different from a sane, long term planetary overview, goals, ideas and concepts of value.
Still globalism of sorts must be. Air and water, toxic waste makes territory as a concept of local risible. Automation and other factors make for human masses that are, on an individual basis, regardless of groupings, liabilities not assets. The worse can be seen, for one, in continent Africa the backyard of Europe well merited.
Not sure if the Zealand event is the bigger slaughter of the day. Israel has been bombing Gaza. It seems the death toll will be dwarfed by conventional players over the week.
What could be a side note, as to the efficiency to comparable miscarriages all over the globe, the single, European descend assailant, unfortunately got the better scores on record.
Playing into the fears of the general populations, this occurrence can be easily abused. This is the invitation to political stances stretch awaited for.
Just some more loose thoughts on the matter, as Muslims go, such a banditry would be mostly ignored. As proven to date.
To end, on an even note, approval or disgust is not intended to be addressed here, there will be enough of that all over. It seems that tensions between subgroups at the bottom of society are escalating. That in itself has to do with elite misconduct, and distrust for the latter. The patching must be done at the high end of global society. An illusion of well-being, a feel of identity must be left alone. And as for the West, it seems that gender and social status seem to become inadequate tags to identity.
Assange’s biggest crime is that he has exposed the inner workings of the Deep State and how there are no governments just the Corporate Fascist Military-Industrial-Intelligence Police State. He showed how they are interrelated world wide and that it’s global conspiracy against the citizens of each country or state. They want him dead.
Assange impersonates a first. A venue-way of allowing discontented and mindful individuals to efficiently, and repeatedly expose systemic functional and dysfunctional attitudes and methods of global elites, their infighting and agreement on method.
By allowing “perpetrators” to stay anonymous, embedded in the tissue of the systemics, even preserve a personal life away from being “martyrs”, to strike another time is the original promise of the internet. Reducing most possibilities for damage control by the authorities. Doxing the culprits in parallel.
Even graphically, and tastefully, thus breaching the hard-nutted general public, the infamous clipping of some cluster of incapacitated humans over Bagdad was real, as only now porn and Hollywood is allowed on the web.
Then Assange as an individual, the prestance, presence of the icon, the personality and brains to extrovert the moral stances. Finally his ultimately courageous stance out of the embassy, while the pressure of the whole of world elites weighted on him. This will go into history as unique. Wikileaks alone exploited the full capacity of the internet. The rest is quacking with limited scope.
Brains and balls, an individual stance, a principled stance, a mind cold enough to entwine technical prowess and content, ethnical Europeans wrote history as to his genes, and that was a long time due. A man of substance, not a billy-o-naire, not a product of financial capitalism, how can it be?
Now to kill him staight-forwardly and burning him in the “pizza” oven as the Saoudis did, seems unacceptable to the crowds. To silence him what a nose-thumb to the elites, the nag persists, perdures.
Snowden has given in, and is forgiven, he cannot make a stance since physical insulation is no option to him. In genetics parlay, Assange, what a deadly mutation, coincidence and driven turned into providence, a rare thing in human history.
Content of value to inexperienced travelers of continents. Condensed to a tool-kit. The twist of staging an interview is fun, and granted.
So true, the zest for adventure and detachment is bred out of the Western European genome.
Lowering standards on unz.com.
About the Author: Brett Redmayne-Titley has published over 170 in-depth articles over the past eight years for news agencies worldwide. Many have been translated. On-scene reporting from important current events has been an emphasis that has led to his many multi-part exposes on such topics as the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations, NATO summit, Keystone XL Pipeline, Porter Ranch Methane blow-out, Hizbullah in Lebanon, Erdogan’s Turkey and many more. He can be reached at: live-on-scene ((at)) gmx.com. Prior articles can be viewed at his archive: http://www.watchingromeburn.uk
Alas, stand in for clutter, nothing-ness of content, and caduque writing. The author must be well meaning but should look elsewhere to peddle his wares.
This piece is a confusing thread in the intellectual echo chamber of the author. Better clear your thinking Sir, —and we are afraid that is not possible to the degree necessary, before trying to make a point to the outside. A case of below grade journalism-fiction-blogging. Nothing this year and last comes close to the lack of quality in thinking and expression here on unz.com. The longest and most laborious mind-fart by anybody writing on this blog. All authors have stood to higher standards.
On top, you seem such a well intentioned person, is that how you got the slot?
Nice take, you fully marked the frame.
Escalation is called for. The enemy decided on the tools and the methods. Covert, is obligatory. Meek is cowardice. Never respect someone who did not return your honoring in the first place. As an individual, a family, whether as a group.
White elites have sold out, it is either being plastered to the bottom or bite and claw. White middle classes have sold out, …time to retract still further into oblivion?
Whites have been bred for submission, as the supreme quality. Christianity has a hand in this. The times require different tricks out of the bag, they are in there. The Three Musketeers, the Malinois dog, Godefroy de Bouillon, the Jester of Richard the Third.
Not the Muslim, the Negro, the Latino is the meaningful enemy, it is the own bosom. The cancer within. Jewish mindsets are to learn from, not to whine about. Loyalty to the inside, anything goes to the outside. Principle, loyalty, psychological smarts, rational long term behavior must be grasped in a single sentence. In group prevalence, the healthy zest for adventure.
Ask yourself, “are the stakes my little misery cocoon, or passing genes into the pool, and thus the future to vouch for”. Of course a White Russian is closer to the hart, then Metropolis Jewish, a Turk that is not one’s personal acquaintance or Muslims anonymous.
Again you Whites no longer have the power to decide on the rules, rules of Enlightenment and individual rights are burned to the ground, you White Proles and Middle class hangers on, are on the defensive. Action, not whining is being called for. Then show some leniency, when the margin allows, as an expression of art and culture, merit, and principle. Practice different rules with your own, and extrovert into conqueror mode to the outside.
We do not want to sound like Jordan Peterson, peddling self-help for the masses, but others are hard at work against your interests, and taking you by the nose, around any bend without you realizing. Tricking you into irrelevant crags and pockets, side-stepping, overloads of junk “intelectualism” and “science” is part of it.
EMJ’s 1200-page TJRS can be found in pdf and djvu formats on Library Genesis and other places on the internet. I ordered his Barren Metal and Slaughter of Our Cities through Amazon. These are relatively mild compared to his other books. If I wanted a book but it was really controversial like the book Ron Unz refers to…
That is the right mindset, the ones who should and can act must stay out of the eye. Now authors not making ends meet, is and can be addressed in other ways, and should as a priority. We wish Ron zero revenue out of Patreon in the same spirit of things.
Physical resistance to the NWO is, I think, most unlikely, not because of overwhelming Jewish power, but because of the treason of non-Jews, the people with power who have been bought and paid for by the Money Power, Jewish, Gentile, Hindu and Muslim.
Good proof of concept. Hindu and Muslim will stay “local”, and “flat” fielders. But as understood, the rule of the land by crude escalation of tools, especially and first financial capitalism and the underbelly, sorrowy consumerism has created the conditioning. Lame, no balls all guts underclasses, and shortsighted elites grown out of it. If the morsel is Amazon, that is a crump. The ultimate cocoon is the US, can anyone conceive a world beyond it, here on unz by Unz?
There is a lot to admire in the Jewish mindset to divert and divest and grope at such a mess. Adapting the tactics of the enemy helps.
It would be great for aphorisms. I was going to say that GK Chesterton would have fit perfectly, but someone probably has a Chesterton tweet stream going right now.
...the strict limits of a few dozen words surely leave render it much more appropriate for slogans or insults than anything more thoughtful or substantive.
It's old news that the early National Socialists were friendly with German Zionists, as they shared the goal of resettling the country's Jews. But it is surprising that this didn't come to a halt once they turned the party over to the psychotic faggot with the mustache. Was it done behind his back?Replies: @jacques sheete, @m___, @Wally
...the extensive Nazi-Zionist economic partnership of the 1930s, which laid the basis for the creation of the State of Israel.
As a rule Jew mongering is on all sides, always, everywhere. One can alter this paradigm in different ways.
Jew = Jewish thirst for power = moneyed elites thirst for power = innate to power
Jew = money && political elites = power elites = corrupted, core rotten WASP elites
Everywhere = global = China = Russia = US = etc.
There is a hundred more variants to the above ones. We need a clear concise vocabulary to get somewhere. After all the variants as to the variables might be many, but human concepts are rather binary and consist of few variables. Too few often to make sense, but that is because the limits of our “deux chevaux” processor and the echo box of our short term memory.
Yes, as always bets were placed on the Nazis by all parties, as always is the case, as today in our cherished US, to which we think to be a considered party.
Is there a juridical answer to the problem of Amazon censorship?
Not a juridical one, that would be like carrying water to the sea. But yes a systemic one: end basing excellency and admiration into monetizing. Economic theoretics that include Nature and it’s resources, the long term, appreciating progress as to derivatives. Nothing less, or not too much can be done practically.
We will all wind up vegans, since grass can be pushed to our controlling budgets as expensive as meat. To say, ‘it’ is everywhere, the system is overheating. Our poor elites, have nowhere to go but imagine, plunk their gains in furthering the thickness of the castle walls.
We evolved into our current form via the brutalities of survival versus a Nature intent on our failure. How ironic that our own sentimentalities will undo eons of selective culling and ensure our extinction.
Not “entitled” but yes, agree.
One single layer, let alone a second, one must be an over achieving Ashkenazim to see.
…and offering to sell PDFs of their works through this website? Maybe a teaser, then $1 per download or something like that? Or maybe even they could make their works public domain and you could offer them electronically…
Halt right there, turning a honey trap into real subversion, you Sir interfere with the experiment! Do not confuse having a stake, ambitioning a stake, and plain revolt. It is a delicate mind to muster and fade the limits. If the control knob is left unattended, the “free speech game” gets out of control.
An also very informative byte, your Andy Warhol adds to the historical perspective.
…give them competition somehow and pull an Andy Warhol on them and go around them. If someone doesn’t then it’s over because they are never going to stop!
And no-one to blame for it, but ourselves. It is plain common sense that creating middle-men, out of intellectual sloppiness, tolerating bottlenecks, not knowing or harnessing knowledgeable and loyal technicians, consumer behavior, not imposing favoritism based on ethics on hardware and software (Free Software Foundation, Stallman, a long time litterate advocate, comes to mind, a Julian Assange), one ends up sitting duck.
The Jewish led assaults on cornering markets, is not outer worldly. A few simple techniques, mind patterns, secondary loyalties can make one his own proper Jew. Indeed it is a matter of not so much intelligence, but simple consequent behavior as to what the hunting grounds consist of. Out of the cocoon, gather context.
The subterranean element, the tripled layers of navigation, the bet all sides of the International Jew, is not beyond Goyim comprehension. Enact on it, will take some balls, so drop that “camino de la mas minima resistencia” approach of a common consumer.
Ron Unz, takes part, the betting all sides is on, the Patreon, the Google analytics, the Word-press, the Cloudflare are by design, not coincidence, nor ignorance. The whining has an explicit goal, dropping of steam in a sterilized manner. The valve of the pressure cooker. That is not how wars are won.
There are times when you capitalize, these are times for Goyim to invest, rally, rethink loyalties, revision methods, get rid of their, to the core, putrid elites. Excellence by wealth is no excellence at all. Above all combine the public whining with some serious covert action. Measure up to the enemy.
The Malinois approach.
Case made, and well.
There is something innate as to printed books, threading, inter-related research depend on openly available sources, the cluster as a whole. Effectively killing an argument by pulling a source as now done by Amazon is mortal to the whole of the cluster and cluster of authors.
Now as for Ron, and pointing so outspokenly and knowledgeably to the phenomenon of long term generational effect, how come the lack of discussion on alternative venueways, the adherance and dependency on a Google analytics, Patreon, Cloudflare, WordPress to name a few. Hard to understand but as by design. Louis Farhakan does better.
It is not that it has not been tried? Do you not agree, you do not have do, now do you.
Indeed. Giving importance to religion is an intellectual trap institutionalized. It only serves psychological sedition, and deters from rational overview. Ideally to serve it’s purpose as a glue, religion can retain the ritualistic, the musical and tonal binds, the magnanimous Cathedrals and Latin as an antidote to porn and soccer in the Euro minds of us deplorables.
Elites should steer away from leaning on the above before anything else. Real progress is top inspired and is agnostic to consumerism (the First religion of the day), and the minor other four or five.
Macron Calls for “European Renaissance” in Controversial Alt-Right Pivot
Guillaume Durocher • March 9, 2019 • 2,800 Words
Great article, infusion of key ideas for a future world. The detour over Macron is granted. Suggested alternative title:
Inspired thinking of Guillaume Durocher on what a future EU[1] scenario can be.
[1] Integration into a planetary concept of rule must be worked out urgently, especially seen the time-frame constraints on toxicity, global growing populations, migrations. And on the positive side, AI (big data and the possibilities of curing then sorting, only then dumping on the public policy). the inspiring work on poly-genic reading (a big data challenge for the larger part), and cross-fingers, gene editing, or at least exponential generational jumps in human nature by selective embryo matching. Thus allowing for time travel, and build acceleration into the Universe.[2]
[2] Guillaume[3] is late on this, and the world of thought of the public ill adapted to the niche public of unz.com. This is an article that will catch lower commenting and reading. It should be archived as a snippet anchored to it’s time of propagation because of it’s core meaningfulness, not word count or comment count.
[3] Exotic sourcing of Guillaume The Rock is a great mental stimulus for Anglo Americans to realize that Europe can do it’s own thinking.
Israel,
Serves the purpose, a most intense, contained, urban-warfare, masses-control experiment and the political beyond. France’s attitudes toward the Yellow Vests are inspired by it. Should be allowed for that alone. The Zionist Jews for once serve a purpose beyond their own group interests. From France, over China to Russia, we learn from the US haggling and hick-ups globally and the Israeli stretching the boundaries of decency.
Baruch Espinoza, marrying science and religion, a lame Pierre Theilhard de Chardin. A glass lense without focus.
Mayo-mo-nides?, Socra-tes? never heard of him.
…an event that occurred in Jerusalem in April 1976, when the South African Prime Minister John Vorster was invited…
These bits help, you are illustrating and sketching what is power at works, and what progress in the long term is not allowed to do.
In global society in this early twenty-first century, there is little room for progress that does not collide with power interests.
Hence planetary rule, to give some lee-way to the elites to experiment and un-cramp their uptight attitudes. Crude prozac of sorts. Creativity needs leisure, play, descaling and multiplying the experiments in social, economical and learning attitudes, the context-ing outside of historical models, re-envisioning established attitudes. Experiments toward quality including global population interference, would then be possible, the newer concepts of non-intrusive biological interactivity with human nature, using big data blobs for meaningful output, curating stale ideas. Turn away from the masses, they seem not to be the most urgent matter. The local in power and the quest for it, is dead anyhow. Theoretical stances, small contained experiments, have real science enact on real life, local experiments to decide global attitudes.
So yes, not power, but progress, and multiplying new mistakes, so much easier contained as our times allow, augmented speed and accuracy of decision without the derivatives of repeated and up-scaled same mistakes would be it.
One single suggestion comes to mind, let in and allow outliers into the educational process, into the machinations of billy-o-nairing, and into establishment, into the world of ideas. Not so much a free flow of capital, but a pulling in of wasted cognitive talent, unconventional thinking, and allow it to build momentum is suppressed. Not crowd control, not educating the masses, but the quest for understanding and progress would give humanity a new outlook and “many new mistakes”, “experimental” progress.
The basing into personal wealth beyond a certain point, and the few brain-dead venue-ways to acquire and cement personal wealth paralyses human society. There is only a few venue-ways to acquire ego and monetized success that is to capitalize on nature, on the growing global sludge classes of disoriented humans, and that corrupted as an important factor what our elites look and feel like. We can say they are repeating the same mistakes, in a spin of repeated fear-induced, cramped ruling. The death of creativity, an epoch of Jewish mindsets for short-term power.
I wouldn't have used "pretty face," but the comment is accurate. I'd have said something like "well-spoken, nonthreatening, movie-president-seeming, quasi-exotic Black man." The first Affirmative Action President. Of course, the same is true of Ilhan Omar herself. A rather dull and shrill White version of this person would be in some Twitter echochamber-ghetto for eternity. Ilhan Omar was promoted to U.S. Congressperson solely because of her race and not her ideas, accomplishments, or talents.Replies: @m___
Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar ripped former President Barack Obama in an interview published Friday, belittling his “pretty face” and saying his agenda of hope and change was an illusion.
Indeed, society goes in layers, she is a consumer product. She is level Starbucks.
I'm getting the idea that you ought to read more and write less.Replies: @m___
The top of our system, the systemics, hopelessly exempt of rational, the under-layers of global society, the population base hopelessly incapacitated for the outliers there is but one thing to do. [sic - WTF?!]
…The top of our system, the systemics, hopelessly exempt of rational, the under-layers of global society, the population base hopelessly incapacitated, for the outliers, there is but one thing to do.
[sic – WTF?!]
You made us see the light, please annul my brokerage.
On the article, the suppression of free speech, and the force feeding of trash information,
On Stan d Mute’s comment to the article
For any who haven’t seen this, we were warned.
Stan, indeed the short mind-burst meant for broad consumption says it all.
Time having done it’s thing, the Sovjet Block, must be replaced with the single global enemy. “The system”, regardless, Chinese, US, EU, Russia, there is nothing new there or here. The obvious is being ignored. There is no sustainability in the global system left. It’s shelf life has expired. There is also no longer a local on the ruling level anywhere on the Planet.
Time having played it’s usual tricks, social media and all, the variable of what was accounted for in the short clip’s covert suggestion, the ignorance of “Americans” included the masses and middle classes, and of course not one but multi generational elites by now, bred for lying about, not balls and brains.
The Malinois dog breed does give us a better example of what that can mean. So taking in the time factor extend “American” to Global Society and we are updating the thorough hindsight of the individual on the clip.
On top, it is underwritten by the interviewer in a timeless fashion: “So what must we do?”
As if the explanation is not self-evident. Well it is not.
And now we get back to our cherished columns, pieces, and other knitting here on unz.com. No the message of the clip is not understood. And worse if it would be understood, and stand up to time, it is such a psychological draw that most of our doggies do not have the stamina regardless of the mind-power to stand up to it.
An example, associative thinking, holding bits of information, catalogue them, and building new associations on top as things come (“news”, novel articles, streaming in), discarding bends and flaws is above the fray here.
It is never that here on Unz readers “jump” the comment column of an explicit article and bring it in obvious correlation with another. What Shamir says, then Karlin, then Sailer, a Paul Craig Roberts is contained within the mind – moment of the comments. So no base knowledge is built, anything goes. That underwrites the essential point: there is but contempt for you reader, and you deserve it. What’s more, most of the content producers, are as far from an essential grasp of things as their readers. Their thing is “writing”, recycling words and go on at infinity. The artesan at work.
Ron Unz, a level up knows this, so indeed the matching controversial viewpoints within the same pages, no necessity in recalling unproven viewpoints, bends into every corner, verbose hooks into everything, linear dissertations into nowhere is a “smart” juggling, psychological truth.
Ron lives for page-views, reader base. And it works sublimely, …as long as the reader base, be it a niche is below a certain level of comprehension. The strategy can be easily extended into the political arena, business, technology incorporated. And for that they should, there is no gratitude in “educating” the masses, the processing power is simply not there. One cannot put a key into a door that has no matching keyhole. Sex is based on the same principle.
The top of our system, the systemics, hopelessly exempt of rational, the under-layers of global society, the population base hopelessly incapacitated, for the outliers, there is but one thing to do.
Lay back in comfort or burden, relax, and if possible enjoy. All layers of society of planet Earth are affected, and that makes for civilizational severe mutilation, systemic change. Coming and coming soon.
Why Do Some People Keep Repeating the Same Mistakes?
Gilad Atzmon • March 7, 2019 • 1,900 Words • 25 Comments •
An antidote to below article of yesterday. And as the quantity and quality of the comments will probably prove, as Ron Unz likes betting numbers rather then quality and lesser popularity, the contradiction will spell the essentials of unz.com. Controversy sells. And in the case of Shamir (yesterday), it does not have to go very deep.
Where Is That Vaunted White IQ?
Israel Shamir • March 7, 2019 • 1,800 Words • 216 Comments •
Crowd control, a Jewish culinary specialty, who can blame them, as long as the bigger group, ruled on elite principles, exclusivity, chosen-ness by means of financial rape, has sold out to a far more consequent ideology and Jewish technical mastery honed historically. The homogeneity of White is not. The White elites despise their own, and financial capitalism allows for it in an exponential way over the timeline of recent human history. Submissiveness that is what Whites are bred for, unlike the Jewish middle class with regards as to the outside of their group.
If the Jewish mindset would focus on hard work as in producing and sustaining a life in the Hertzl spirits, they would go the way of the Muslims, the White proles, African and Latino descend “minorities”.
This last suggestion is not a matter of preference but survival for the Jewish middle class. Israel today is rather in a dangerous position, from lure to bait in a whiff is always present. The Jews will have to keep scrambling, the White elites can no longer turn their backs to them, from what it seems. Globally there has been created an enormous distance between the crowds, the most, and the mastery of control of the few.
The battle of real minds will do.
Betting all and every side, is Shamir as well as media-middle-class Jewish. The methods of bread writing are applied as ever. Some do it with less sophistication as Saker, then some manage to extrapolate the close personal responsibility as Karlin, putting the blame in the graphs.
Keeping the entropy going, is what counts, so one can surf another “issue” in the morrow. These methods of proceeding are well known, …and do work, not so much to blame as to the smartness of the authors, it is fairly easy to appropriate the concept, Ron Unz does it in an exponential way, but because of the sheer dumbness of the crows, the niche groups of the cloud included.
It is also well known that society progresses in a hick-up way, small considerable changes unexpectedly consequence of very few individuals and concentration of energy (work).
But power is the rule of short term smartness, the whole of the elites and all of the energy of the middle classes is directed towards that goal. Nothing else matters but to crow on a pile of dung regardless.
Whites have a stellar IQ compared to Blacks; this is an idea one often encounters in the writing of my esteemed colleagues on Unz.com. But when the country, the USA, was in dire need, the only person who dared to step forward into the line of fire was not a smart white guy, but a brave black woman, Ilhan Omar.
>> Quatsch << at work. Individuals in the public domain are exploited from behind the scene. They can bask in the sunlight, to be discarded as any consumer object duly should. Behind the scenes one bets all sides, it is clear that the substantiated sum of peoples is a liability to the elites, and to be imploded onto itself.
How to read the rest of the binary? Well Malinois dogs could be an inspiration to the Western descend Europeans with ambitions other then the next corner in the road. Seventy percent breeding, and sorting of what is left to one in ten is a good start. Brains and balls and both essential, show pretty examples over history. Non intrusive sorting of embryos, further and better genetical analysis and later editing. "artificial intelligence", for now sorting out of data that matter, will denounce and the Jew mindset, and the primitive breeding for quantity, but not the viewpoints that we recognize as Enlightenment, courage, longer term ambitions and goals, inclusiveness on the lowest level, the individual. Some of them Whites and Jews of the better ones of that nature.
Above ream of values was betrayed by White elites, and forgivably never understood by the ninety nine percent, including such ponies as Shamir and Ilhan Omar, all that is political posing, and mind-shaping of the short term variety. Quality wise comparable to soft-porn.
Israel took to the bone, but Shamir, running circles is not the goal. Our society is in need for reshaping or disruption and cramping. Is that one too far for you? Is it not that late in life, it should matter less, how your personal ambitions compare to general well-being of the planet. Your testament will it be a base message as the above?
Best explanation, to the point. These elements must play for and against Islam. The context playing an important role.
What about the Balkan, part of it, why is Turkish Islam pushed aside by generational Muslims, the younger generations, for a cruder, better sponsored Saudi Arabia one. How come they do not adapt the more then one woman part. Is fashion at play, the consumer environment, and it the more important part of today’s religious attractions mostly identity politics. Belonging.
…the next question is: who does this century belong to? The struggle for that title will doom us all. Those powers seeking to gain should not gloat. The world is already in a state of entropy
Who will crow on a pile of dung. If solutions are meant, a planetary at the least, goal should be set by coordinated world governance, not based on the principles of what we understand by globalism at hoc, today.
That is about as possible as setting a precise time-line for soft boiled eggs at breakfast. The time it is a quarrel, the mind it is a mush. And that’s on a Sunday morning.
Orwellian
At unz.com we like Orwellian, that is why we “do” Patreon. And CloudFlare, and outsourced statistics analysis.
Saker up front, and Shamir in a wheelchair to the left.
I’m amazed you’re allowed to run a campaign on Patreon. How’d that happen?
That’s to be reverse engineered by schmoozing only.
Another one? Karlin is posted as the successor in waiting of Ron. Hold on to your wits!
It’s a pity, Ron, that your present article describes your site as “a publication providing a convenient home to both the Alt-Left and the Alt-Right, joint access to ideological extremists, conspiracy theorists, racialists, historical revisionists, and other miscellaneous malcontents” instead of as having higher quality-standards than those less-successful sites do, but that’s sadly an accurate description of your site. At least you were honest there.
Indeed, the tining and texture, the content management, the php coding for style, meritorious.
The functionality of the comments and the possibilities for the backend to mine data notorious.
Nothing original but well done, and shoestring Ron only knows how much man-hours of tweaks that takes.
StackExchange, Github, Fecesbook, Twitter, Google all know that part of the game well.
The applicancy of method and understanding of data mining is meant to be a compliment for a “one-man” operation.
Strategically analysing what associative methods are possible makes Ron a mind to recon with.
Sadly the Jew mindset kicks in, put smart analytics into dumb systemics …and wake up in the middle of New York or Brussels.
Politicians, lobby-ists, bread-writers, media queens of a single night, dark suit mafia types.
Ex nihilo, historical models are dead by altering contexts.
The most meaningful utterance in a “decade” on unz.com. More of this, there must be a public for in depth and well defined vocabularies. A book’s worth.
On Engelhardt, his “dispatches”.
…Are a verbal IQ test. Needed is a 100 points, nausea kicks in at a 107, that’s the market’s low end at unz.com when defined vertically, at least the part Unz cares about. Engelhardt must be brick headed to dram on into eternity. Nomi, why not try childrens’ novels?
Our question and answer, “Why is what is who pays for it?”. Ask Greenwalt Glenn about coziness.
To give a flat binary some texture. What about throwing Bernie, Warren, Trump, Davos, socialism, into a single dumbster, and you our blossomy Nomi, sitting on top, to keep them from breathing.
A picturesque world you are painting Mevrouw, wonder who pays you for such shortsightedness. Your views are what main street is paved of. Bowing to a crowd of ignorants must make you the smarter one. Your silence on banking matters is well appreciated.
Indeed, in the view of general human nature, the cesspool of current society, Gould was a winner.
One single book and consolidating the derivative of personal wealth and ego. Could as well have written the Koran, single-handedly, and glorified Muslim civilization, or Harry Potter.
A winner is someone with disregard for the longer term, the extended context, the lack of ethics, in our current social system. Some-one who rules on crap, not unlike our current billionaire class. He wins. The up-vote done by democratic dumb-sters, the next time, my time, middle class crows.
Very well exposed. To put it along other lines: White values: conceptual-ism, the individual. Resulting in progress minus derivatives. The one step ahead in the long term.
The two steps backwards. Ethnic centricities and their culprits, most other ethnic groups at large, collectivism based on relative arguments (who rules (on a pile of shit or a civil marvel being no issue), practicality, the short term.
The biggest excesses of White civilization: elitism inside the larger collective, turning into elites of own stock selling out. The lack of individual exceptionals, their strength, as compared to the collective stress of other groups. Quality versus numbers.
To carry this one step ahead, for what it may be worth, turning breeding into a White man’s tool, religion solutioning what rational thinking cannot solve, a dead end. Nature is on the White rational individual’s side.
From the hip, late as always.
The Empire: Now or Never
??? Rodeo drive. —America is on the defensive, it sheds assets, the dollar, less volume in transactions, less possibilities to cook the books. It’s population’s interests, thus it’s territory. The phalanx of Praetorians is a mercenary fraction.
Reed, Fred we presume, should set his arguments straight. Are population, consumption, growth economics, military capitalism imposed by not being able to control the accounting of the global commercial fluxes assets or liabilities. One or the other, or both at the same time, according to the context of the rant? Then with some variables well defined, maybe speculate on any outcome.
This theological piece was only bested by M. T. Klare’s, an Engelhardt copy paste on military tectonics this same week in our beloved colums catering to the most of the many. Glut sells.
orry about fixing the bullshit you have at home dip-shit! I guess being the world’s top producer o porn, consumer of drugs and largest prisoners incarcerated makes you the example of a successful democratic society. The US has more Socialists programs in place than most Socialists Countries. And your government wipes the Zionist milk off their face with your constitution Trumpster! If socialism is as bad as Trump says, why does he not just them crumble under the weight of
Clear angle, and it shows, your viewpoint is exquisite. The US, instead of giving up on it’s territory? (immigration and all), say, has given up on ninety nine percent of it’s population. The Central Bank, doing a “refresh” every single month, between “re-installs” takes care of that. Washington must run a Windows XXX system.
It is indeed amazing, that the sensitivity of the population is so dulled that even the best of outliers has given up on them.
"Henceforth", "supremacist-racist-xenophobic and war-mongering government", and the best, "above-described context".........."Above", in face to face conversation? Oh man. Feels as Saker's inside joke.Replies: @bluedog, @Tusk, @Rabbitnexus, @Miggle, @ploni almoni, @jacques sheete, @padre, @m___
Henceforth, the continuous coup d’état promoted by the supremacist-racist-xenophobic and war-mongering government of Donald Trump that aims to impose a governing puppet and the threats of a military invasion in our homeland, which are part of the above-described context.
“Henceforth”, “supremacist-racist-xenophobic and war-mongering government”, and the best, “above-described context”……….”Above”, in face to face conversation? Oh man.
Some Latino-Spanish indeed. Not your average doodle.
…itcoin is probably an NSA creation with no anonymity and subject to manipulation. So that is not a safe solution, though a highly publicised recent trade worth USD7000 between Arg…
Weak notion.
I wonder what is keeping China from taking the lead with an alternative to dollar based trade when China’s strategic partners Iran and Venezuela are struggling with sanctions.
The outright better point to make.
Soft answer: insecure China, they reluct from taking the lead, knowing they are not offering any new take on capitalism. It is all about the long term for China, the last man alive, after the last man standing is done. The ignorance of the Empire, is compensated by the lack of physical courage, justified that, by intellectual assurance that harder and faster is closer to the abyss. Creepy Chinese, headstrong morons on the US side.
As to the article, format and content meet. The interviewee seen his position cannot offer a glimpse of the innards, wonder he has any himself. The solicitor, has only words to wield. It is indeed a parody of analysis, a jest on journalism.
Replies: @m___, @Endgame Napoleon, @Aft
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffreydorfman/2017/08/13/the-biggest-and-best-tax-break-of-all-time/#c8044f2b23fb
Most of his wealth came not from his salary, but from the Microsoft stock that he owns, equal to about 10% of the company’s outstanding shares. Wealth gained from stock price appreciation is not taxable until you sell the shares. By holding most of his shares since the company’s founding, Mr. Gates delayed paying tax on those capital gains. By donating the shares to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, that wealth will never be taxed.
Thus, the fact that capital gains are not taxed as long as the asset is held (and, in real estate, not even when sold if the proceeds are reinvested in a “like” asset) and the existence of the charitable donation tax deduction have provided Bill Gates with what might be called the biggest tax break in history. The federal government likely lost out on $15-20 billion. Even for the federal government that is real money, enough to, for example, run the State Department for about a year.
The matter of a corrupt system, is the matter. It is not even a Gates thing, it is also a Clinton thing, an everybody but Trump thing (too archaic an oligarch?, or did we miss something). It is not even the matter of applying means to real issues. Whether State Department, or NASA, or EU, UN, The Arab Emirates, Israel, anything thrives on the shale gas principle. Most of the world population is versed into the relative riches of some despicable “elites”.
History has a history of above, today, never more then ever. A laugh, both sides of the coin are flat. Our precious crowds do not grasp their redundancy, the middle class, free range coop chickens of a global farm, …could it be that our elites are drowning?
Not because of spoils, but derivatives of the dregs for spoils. It looks like they are pushing against barriers as population, migration, toxicity, obsoleteness of war, financial capitalism having to turn into medieval military drumming.
Gates is a softy, the Clintons, another Billy, and his type (nothing personal) are the more dangerous mercenaries.
…when it comes to helping the Third World, he has a blind spot.
We deplorables might have.
What are Foundations for? Consolidating private fortunes? What stands the Middle East and Africa for? No accountability? Legitimate system, “legitimate” scopes, different rules for the corny elites of a corrupt system, allowing for corrupted spoils. Oiliocracy, farmacology, oligarchy, idiocracy is given birth here, times and again. The phenomenon sustains a middle class of consultants, politicians, encrusted molusks of the societal tissue, and that is why they keep numb. Of course half a cent on the dollar might touch the dusty soil of the outer space continent of Africa.
As most of us, Bill has base close to home concerns, the rest is sub-contracted. Nothing fancy. No principle involved. Distinction comes by fractions of a billion.
A personal experience that supports your thesis ...
Selecting your students has more impact than selecting your teachers.
Amazing how talent is spotted in sports, early on, in music, in dance yet, picking outliers of one in five thousand on cognitive capabilities is not tempting. Wasted outliers.
In what average IQ has meaning mostly is that the middle the curve provides the run-off. After that it is all up to the outliers, to be bored and suppressed in the dumb systemics of our society.
The likes of Gates and Davos. Throw enough money at a problem and it serves a gateway to the next pothole. There is always the servile middle class to cater to the billy-o-naires.
The constricted blur of reality, of our compliments, goes to relative riches, very poor indeed as compared to incremental advances, a net result after derivatives.
chess strategy
“Any AI smart enough to pass a Turing test is smart enough to know to fail it.”
― Ian McDonald, River of Gods
Noting that both John von Neumann and Bertrand Russell advocated a nuclear strike, or the threat of one, to prevent the Soviets acquiring the atomic bomb, Nick Bostrom says the relatively unlimited means of superintelligence might make for its analysis moving along different lines to the evolved "diminishing returns" assessments that in humans confer a basic aversion to risk
Garry Kasparov, who gave his own perspective on it, noting:
(...) I admit that I was pleased to see that AlphaZero had a dynamic, open style like my own. The conventional wisdom was that machines would approach perfection with endless dry maneuvering, usually leading to drawn games. But in my observation, AlphaZero prioritizes piece activity over material, preferring positions that to my eye looked risky and aggressive.
Replies: @m___
There is what I call a “good-story bias” that limits what kind of scenarios can be explored in novels and movies: only ones that are entertaining. This set may not overlap much with the group of scenarios that are probableFor example, in a story, there usually have to be humanlike protagonists, a few of which play a pivotal role, facing a series of increasingly difficult challenges, and the whole thing has to take enough time to allow interesting plot complications to unfold. Maybe there is a small team of humans, each with different skills, which has to overcome some interpersonal difficulties in order to collaborate to defeat an apparently invincible machine which nevertheless turns out to have one fatal flaw (probably related to some sort of emotional hang-up).
One kind of scenario that one would not see on the big screen is one in which nothing unusual happens until all of a sudden we are all dead and then the Earth is turned into a big computer that performs some esoteric computation for the next billion years. https://blog.oup.com/2014/09/interview-nick-bostrom-superintelligence/
Your point is taken. We probably will not see the coming. That is none of us, no cluster, will scale to the difference of speed assessing more variables, thus better decisions. As is, as an example, the humanoid is bluffing and playing stone age war games, while mostly un-aware, that these obsolete maneuvers only concern positioning in a systemically dumb concept of our restricted reality, where we happen to make out, where things are made up, where reality fits not. Even our concepts of being obsolete, becoming irrelevant, becoming extinct are grounded in pre modern human psychological concepts. Thinking rationally has been a deadly mutation.
Clusters of humans, indeed scale badly, no cabling yet, to take advantage of assimilating more variables to better draft scenarios. Big data, a necessary pillar of better analysis is such a delusion, not because intrinsic value not being up to the promise, but caduque algorithmic searches and pre-poned questions, as to what to look for by human operators.
The certainty that the humanoid needs refactoring or bust, beats the anguish about AI ever materializing learning capacity. There is another “promising” factor at play, it is computerized analysis, processing power, and only that, what can give us a workable understanding of ourselves. DNA and the universe around it, and if that leads to manipulation of our nature, could be a path out.
No matter what takes the laurels, no drastic change beyond our comprehension stands for “drowning” in a matter of generations. Our tools, though brainless, have already mastered us. Imagine, imagine, we cannot.
Thanks for your interchange.
Our human “emotional” preference: genetic manipulation, and live to fight another round.
On Haiti et al.
Haiti can stay what it is, a social, milito-politico experiment, the smallest lab globally. Less significant then Gaza, and for that matter Israel. They are the close up experiments to follow.
Nothing concerning Haiti matters in the real world. The Clintons netted a half a hundred million out of it, no sweat, really, a one man pay. No game for deep state, the bounty is not worth the ammunition.
No stealth, no power. No global reach no reach at all. No centralized execution, no strategic survival. No disparate physical presence, no quality of life.
The ‘groups’ mentioned were first in building a working model of an imposing concept that tends to prefer conceptual thinking above “markets”. They own the merit.
Where it fails is in the goals and “desires” of what is to be the long term future of our planet, and what the extroversion of the human presence, the individual quality of life should be. The tools are shaped, and can be molded, what fails is the concepts, that can be sustained over generations with maximal stability.
A single notion, to see every individual as human, equal, and having rights, will have to fade.
Associative thinking and searching will unearth the obvious, so obvious, it leads to frustration…
The trap of the outlier. You, Hopkins, strayed of, the message is not ready to be absorbed, it is not digestive. Not appetizing, it goes against our nature of “commoner” Americans.
You are too far out in the wing, …or not far enough, the draft is getting at you.
Unfortunately, there is no America. There is nothing to make great again. “America” is a fiction, a fantasy, a nostalgia that hucksters like Donald Trump (and other, marginally less buffoonish hucksters) use to sell whatever they are selling … themselves, wars, cars, whatever. What there is, in reality, instead of America, is a supranational global capitalist empire, a decentralized, interdependent network of global corporations, financial institutions, national governments, intelligence agencies, supranational governmental entities, military forces, media, and so on. If that sounds far-fetched or conspiratorial, look at what is going on in Venezuela.
On Juan Guaido (alas gaio, young rooster, as his predecessors in the family tried to botch his peasant modes). No testing for education, IQ, achievement, as all politicians out of the blue. Could have been a horse, “but it is our horse”. By the way we got our own “Ron Gaio”, next president, shimmering to be useful somewhere in the future.
The entire global capitalist empire is working in concert to force the elected president of the country out of office. The US, the UK, Canada, France, Germany, Spain, Austria, Denmark, Poland, the Netherlands, Israel, Brazil, Peru, Chile, and Argentina have officially recognized Juan Guaido as the legitimate president of Venezuela…}
Could it be said that the “elites” are global, “Americans” are stuck locally.
What what about those American oil corporations? They want that Venezuelan oil, don’t they? Well, sure they do, but here’s the thing … there are no “American” oil corporations. Corporations, especially multi-billion dollar transnational corporations (e.g., Chevron, ExxonMobil, et al.) have no nationalities…
Global capitalism has done away with them. Which is why we are experiencing a “neo-nationalist” backlash. Trump, Brexit, the so-called “new populism” … these are the death throes of national sovereignty…
Yes, evidently and manifestly, there is some global rule tentatives, since over thirty years, (allowing time to dawn into the minds of the money elites’ skulls).
What is the hardest parts of this? For the locals, most certainly, giving up the idea that as a group they are defined as Americans, have a stake in the global riches or as it goes decadence. That they will get lucky on an individual basis.
Unlikely, in the conventional sense. Might be very similar to stat polygenic scores. Will be impossible to interprete outcomes.
Our guess, most individuals will become irrelevant in the larger sense. The fishing systematically for outliers, and it’s neglect, makes for the human hardwired failure.
chess strategy
“Any AI smart enough to pass a Turing test is smart enough to know to fail it.”
― Ian McDonald, River of Gods
Noting that both John von Neumann and Bertrand Russell advocated a nuclear strike, or the threat of one, to prevent the Soviets acquiring the atomic bomb, Nick Bostrom says the relatively unlimited means of superintelligence might make for its analysis moving along different lines to the evolved "diminishing returns" assessments that in humans confer a basic aversion to risk
Garry Kasparov, who gave his own perspective on it, noting:
(...) I admit that I was pleased to see that AlphaZero had a dynamic, open style like my own. The conventional wisdom was that machines would approach perfection with endless dry maneuvering, usually leading to drawn games. But in my observation, AlphaZero prioritizes piece activity over material, preferring positions that to my eye looked risky and aggressive.
Replies: @m___
There is what I call a “good-story bias” that limits what kind of scenarios can be explored in novels and movies: only ones that are entertaining. This set may not overlap much with the group of scenarios that are probableFor example, in a story, there usually have to be humanlike protagonists, a few of which play a pivotal role, facing a series of increasingly difficult challenges, and the whole thing has to take enough time to allow interesting plot complications to unfold. Maybe there is a small team of humans, each with different skills, which has to overcome some interpersonal difficulties in order to collaborate to defeat an apparently invincible machine which nevertheless turns out to have one fatal flaw (probably related to some sort of emotional hang-up).
One kind of scenario that one would not see on the big screen is one in which nothing unusual happens until all of a sudden we are all dead and then the Earth is turned into a big computer that performs some esoteric computation for the next billion years. https://blog.oup.com/2014/09/interview-nick-bostrom-superintelligence/
Interesting analysis. But your conclusion only matters if Group A has competition in its territory. If Group A is safely alone in its territory it will face a population decrease, but that might not be a bad thing. This is why the USA and the European world are staring at the abyss, while Japan and South Korea are not. Our birth rates would not necessarily be a problem in and of themselves. They are a problem because our leaders have opened our borders to all comers.Replies: @Tyrion 2, @m___, @Tyrion 2, @Almost Missouri
No. Group A is diminishing 10% per generation while Group B is growing 15% per generation. The difference isn’t “half a child” or even 25 percentage points. The difference is the future or lack of it. The difference is literally infinite.
This is why the USA and the European world are staring at the abyss, while Japan and South Korea are not. Our birth rates would not necessarily be a problem in and of themselves. They are a problem because our leaders have opened our borders to all comers.
Regardless of the math problem being pasted over. There is a clear point to be made by you.
People and their policies come and go. It is mostly one step forward, two steps backwards. Whether Europe will make a U-turn, we cannot anticipate. But interestingly, rarely mentioned in these fora, the concept of first deciding what the future should be built on, then vie for it, rather then lapping up problems defecating problems, all in one day, is received loud and clear.
Then yes, reduced populations per territory, should not be considered at all, a liability. Secondly the proportionality globally of population groups, and their distribution over livable landmasses, and later hopefully extra-Terra colonies should be considered, tweaked and tuned. Through migration policies, mentality changes, higher quality population genetics tuning, precise and vast data applications. It cannot be that an argument for higher birthrates for Whites is based on counter-arresting the push of “other” populations.
To get back to Israel as of today, it is the single most pertinent sociological, political, ethnical, military confined as can be, lab study of our days. To go narrow, address one’s own plate of mush, in some cases, in this case, is not the way a global comprehension of what the world should be, should grow. In matters of migrations and populations, the US is not the mathematical zero.
Populations, their collective behaviour, their planetary spread, are the single most important factor as to solving the long term future. Long being plus ten generations, should be within the reach of the one percent of individuals with means and some kind of passable intellect. Trying anything else but what failed, the times are ripe for “conceptual”, ex-nihilo, Darwinesque approaches.
Leaving aside all the estimates and assumptions that are built into TFRs and leaving aside the fact that TFR totally ignores the effect of faster or slower generations, people, even intelligent people, commonly misunderstand the arithmetic of TFR.
[From] 7.5 [to] 6.7 [=] a drop of 10 percent.
[From] 4.0 [to] 4.2 [=] a rise of perhaps 5 percent.
from about 2.6 ... to 3.0 [=] an increase of about 15 percent.
from about 2.1 ... to about 2.6 [=] almost 20 percent
from about 1.8... to about 2.1 [=] rose by almost 15 percent
A beauty of meaningful reasoning, but lost to our crowd. This is by design.
The unz.com site seeks to weight opinion by the standard tools. Somewhere to be of use, somehow, to be sold as statistical data to poll and politics designers, a platform to lift some hapstancer to fame for a day. Short attention spans, repeated errors, circular reasoning, pliers statistics (Karlin is the champ), it is ever present and meant to be. Not Hollywood, not RT, certainly not Russia Insider, or Amy Goodman, but as close as the niche allows.
You better hush off to some deeper cave, because here you are in the middle of a circus, a turning “caroussel”, and it is designed to be just that.
A regular commenter, Peter Auss, points to the situation as a bar, a pub, and that is close. A stylish Wien-isch coffeehouse, with succulent pastries, discreet music, not Starbucks, but still, parvenu. We are what we are, and that is still a fraction above anything else called “The American People”.
Appreciating the humor, BMI of the actors, and the elegance of the choir.
Generally speaking, you’d think that whoever is on the top perch wouldn’t try to upset the existing order. But that’s if those on the top perch have any brains. The US is consistently undermining itself and every aspect of its dominance for the last ~20 years, which shows that American elites degenerated to the point of being medically certifiable.
The commoners, always a substance of meat merry on, but some opportunistic insiders and even some outliers can see it. Loyalty within the elites is breaking down, meaning the few real counselors and allowed strategists are sided. No Brzezinski no Kissinger, individuals regardless of their ideas, but having some consequence and substance, with the intellectual stamina to drive the herd of dykes that are visible on the media scene, they cannot streamline the plot. The other so called “experts” are just confused and opportunistic. The theater and it’s actors doubt their picks, cannot judge, even the quality of their “souffleurs”. That is why the scenario changes constantly. There is no sustainable scenario left.
Notice, there is more coherence, stability, synchronous, and lasting “palabrar” in Russia and China. That is how biodiversity creeps in. The elites should mentalize their backbone, they are going to need it. The war is not on the crowds, that one is long won. It is in the chambers of the palace. By level of importance, the potty boy, the courtisan, the officer of the guard, they are preying. The middle class, the submissive class, the confidentes of the parlours of power play the day to day.
Sit back and enjoy, why should life be petty and pretty when it can be brutal and short-lived. Stumps and screeches from the top, call it tweets. As the tools define the message. The sitcom is becoming less and lees boring.
Does a database, and a service of encrypted mail messages have a home? The home is where the server is. Since the server is replicated onto other hardware machines, since there is to be controlled routing involved, ...since the sloppiness of comprehension for most is limited to the "software" protocols who run up and down the beacons of routers... since accounting principles are as flawed from one side of the globe to the other, Belgium has no meaning in the script.
On SWIFT, "created, centered, stationed" in Belgium
By the way, our sincere compliments to magnanimous Ron for his impeccable formatting in the narrow sense. The blue-es, the black-es, the grey-es, there is a beauty and sophistication in the html and css as posted here, the correlated functionality.
See, to draw it once more into the open, less can be better. A world by design, rather then an accumulation of debris. Now let’s match the content to our beautiful environment as interacted upon by the poly-genic Ron.
Left, how to plug into the misery text boxes, an external editor of choice. Or is that a browser issue?
My guess is SWIFT was created/centered in Belgium just to give it an aire of international credibility, but it seems to be just a subsidiary of Wall Street since all the transactions are run through Wall Street offices.
But now, cyber warfare has become a way of pulling out the connections of any economy. And the major cyber connections are financial money-transfer ones, headed by SWIFT, the acronym for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, which is centered in Belgium.
On SWIFT, “created, centered, stationed” in Belgium
Does a database, and a service of encrypted mail messages have a home? The home is where the server is. Since the server is replicated onto other hardware machines, since there is to be controlled routing involved, …since the sloppiness of comprehension for most is limited to the “software” protocols who run up and down the beacons of routers… since accounting principles are as flawed from one side of the globe to the other, Belgium has no meaning in the script.
Belgium …is where some high paid salaried SWIFT jobbers are plugged into the financial lifeline, for tax reasons and public deceit. SWIFT is no different from Western Union at scale, Fecesbook, or Google, serfs of the powers that be, playing out their minimal comprehension of things digital, admittedly so far ahead of our politicians that they can monetize on ignorance in the short term.
Now since the US dollar becomes a “local” affair. Russia and China, and the ones that see an alternative there, being it a polar world again, do provide a plug into their hard and soft and accounting alternative. Thus SWIFT might return to “small business” status (less transaction volume meaning less need for tools to assist perverting reality. For what it is worth, a happy affair, submissiveness to the mafia overlords will pay less. Not that Russia, or China, will do a better job of fair accounting, but it cannot get worse, and it has lasted in public terms “a very long time”.
Any warrior, that seeks to unplug can play pirate and Ruble or Renminbi, or anything exotic called “financial tools”. And they should, and some will, we’d be amazed that speculating the short term does not include Russia or China, or Bitcoin, or Switzerland. Impossible to ignore for any bankster institution, meat of politician, or greedy business man.
Where Hudson is not helpful is in going that next step. Before …and afer Trump, see the nihilistic misery spec. of the “while” in between the two, the accounting of assets and liabilities, at the very base and core of human interaction was always flawed. It had a good reason, the ledger was unable to grasp the magnitude of what represents the planet, the dynamics, the volume, any angle one prefers to give to it. Theoretical economics is alchemy, not physics, nor engineering.
The problem today in making better assessments is smaller, assets and liabilities do not have to be condensed in primitive tokens as Dollar, or Gold or Bitcoin for the matter. AI, to be understood as operating on massive data sets, can give an idea, better then any Stock Exchange, real-time to “all” (as in all that have an interest and the minimal comprehension) what the state of the world is to be. The stock exchanges, came to similar conclusions, of course to convert and divert to the riches of a few. The idea is not new, the goal to which it applies can be baked into another definition of ethical “liberalism”.
That kind of liberalism, concern and solubility on a planetary scale and the long term, of course, is wasted on human nature, Hudson included. Seems Hudson likes as change of skeleton to hang his coat on, and have the mary-go-round revolve for another spin. The good guys and the bad ones. As for poor Trump, in the ledger of the planet, the longer run, his bucket has no meaning.
I am not aware of any Artificial Intelligence that can totally replicate human nature.
AI, to be understood as operating on massive data sets, can give an idea, better then any
Indeed, quality of desire. Is there any conceptual advantage in bigger populations at all. That is even putting aside proportionality.
The concept of growth, in the future will serve no one, not the ones that matter equally. Mind games, as this piece cannot compensate for mindgames as how to build and sustain quality populations that correspond to abundance of resources and reserves where they constitute a vault for high mind experiments that transgress base principles of producing derivatives and waste.
Come China, come USA, whatever else, the ugly duck quacks the same.
Throw the brightest minds onto dumb systemics and you get Karlin on G5. Is there a loop on this site that feeds into itself?
Admittedly, the confusion of language can be unending. But the post if rightfully understood: “authoritarianism” instead of hidden authoritarianism in “democracy”as in the West now-a-days, has but the who exercises it, as a difference.
Replies: @Che Guava, @m___, @CanSpeccy
The movement must be populist that folds the left and right together against the cosmopolitan middle that consists of the economic neoliberal right and the cultural left. The nationalism must be its glue and the enemy (there always must be an enemy) the financial international elite. Anyway you cut it it will be some sort of fascism.
On Facism…
Fascism is not a bad thing. Mussolini got it almost right. Few weeks ago I wrote a comment that a populist movement that can bring the left and the right together is the only solution.
The movement must be populist that folds the left and right together against the cosmopolitan…
…quite to the point.
A good example of how understanding social and political reality has many a layer. Again, to the core, and after peeling and poking, the above commentary makes sense.
The big wrong conceptually of Facism as a political theory, is probably the in-tenability of a social system that elaborate and costly. More so today, since the populations versus physical resources is out of proportion. The added value of a population has become a liability. This in less then half a century, two generations. War being obsolete, the strive for wealth rather immensely complex comparably, since bit by bit the exhaustion of physical resources must be in-calculated into a finite world.
Just as a remark, a dictator, often associated with de facto Facist regimes, can as well be a group. Say “deep state” in the US today, say Bolshevics of the early hour. For one, “media” alas “propaganda” haven’t stopped either.
That brings us to mention, that Fascism can be a theory of global dominion. Secondly, all and every political theory is outdated, simply because the environment has changed, anywhere locally, on the face of the globe. There are no historical models that correspond to today’s organic reality.
Finally that makes rummaging as here, quite possible but inutil. Some variables present today, were not, at least that apparent and visible then. Exit old school Fascism, as much as anything else pre financial capitalism, as viable.
“To stay on the funny side of all of it”
Encryption and anonymity, on the other side of the problem, transparency and communality. Either end anihilates the other. To use encryption both ends must have a grasp of it, to be anonymous, the ego must be so, to broadcast, the message must be “cheap”, community is built on greed.
The value of the tool, be it, to be versed into dumb systemics. If less then one percent of the population rules the other end, based on ideas and tools that are a pity, how much peering needs to be done?
AI, alias “artificial intelligence”. The disappearence of the middle class is mostly a good thing. It is glue that holds the elites in place. They impede any change. Inertia incorporated.
Diaspora
Now what business model might that be?!
Main question, who finances a bleeder? and on and on… No technicalities apparent, same with a twist? In earlier times, there were fables and “sprookjes” for infants, there was robust semi-lies for the adults. Seems fables graduated, most similar to dumbing down universities to narratives. MacDo for the masses.
Key point is, action, rather than bemoaning the current sad state of affairs, is needed. I wonder how many moaners are ready to act. Any volunteers (knowing full well that Big Brother is watching you)?
Nil, none, zil as to volunteers. Whining is an excuse for the passive subversive, the no-balls, low-drive, slow-life, pseudo intellectual. The only graft is getting by on producing nihilistic, irrelevant, incomplete, short-term sputters, almost all utter without even comprehending the toolkit they use. There are other jobbers and intermediates for that.
No goals, no change, no cause, no plans. “Communication” for the heck of it. To refer back to our earlier comment, it is not the message, it is the automation. Crowd control is done, the joyous part is that the middle-class glory-days as mercenaries to assist the herding, are close to over. They are set up to be swiped into the sludge they tended to cater to. The Ukrainians?, what about AI? AI writes, and getting better at it.
Three licks from us.
“Darn, this hillside is cold!”
The wining of Shamir (again), the proposed solutions way crappy, the surroundings forgotten (randomly, Cloudflare, Patreon, Twitter, Google, Windows, whatever else (including unz.com), the hardware control (chips on chips, additional chips accessed over proprietary protocols, routers), Social media as such, Any human middle man, the hardware producer.
When man wants to press a button, pass a message, is it important to be heard harnessing the most? Or is the idea to leave an original message, over time, wasted on immediate interests?
As Dykstra said above, the truth is dangerous, may we add, networks are built one person at a time, not on shared gloating, but on sweat. His example stands, Spinoza, not to be wasted on history, marrying God and science was not the brightest of ideas admittedly.
Wayward, backwards, technology, as a pen, a printed page, is to be understood as neutral to innocence, ignorance, and then knowledge. In a next step the crowds are going to disappear even to themselves in blandness, the real consequence being the middle-class becoming insignificant, since crowd control is automation, not what is said. There might be correlation and causation depending on the way one ventures into it. Does Shamir realize that twenty years from now that a similar persona will be worth the rags on his back?
Crowdfunding?, a laugh, collecting a fraction of the trickle down of job serfs, what we need is Clowns. Assange, the block chain, printed books, not scribes and whiners who do not (Shamir), or do well understand media tools (Unz Ron?) and set up for abuse, are compromised to the neck. Which of both is worse.
Reply to commenter Counterinsurgency
As all great thoughts, shaped by words, the toolbox is partly your own customization, a skeleton to grasp and capture the essential. Another tool is “jumps”, you made a few lock-steps ones. Associative thinking at it’s best!
Our tangent, reading is faster then writing, listening is slower then reading, then again speaking beats writing.
From these a lot can be explored as to the who-is of the listener and the writer or speaker alike, it explains away part of human behaviour. It might even refer to why the Bible, and the Koran do not have a single clown?
Back to your logic of things.
Dreams and clowns.
Literature, fiction, and actors away from the power “salons”. …To grasp the “dream of the real”, the many, only slight variants, we fellow humans are entwined into. Your tools to explain away the tarball of reality is refreshing. The example to put it to the test, WWII, appropriate, since the scenario runs for over a century.
Better then fiction.
Always anew amazing how to get to explore the periphery of the dreams of convention, the comforts of ordinary. These asynchronous, and locationally different live paths, seem to lead a few individuals to the core understandings that are relevant, timely, and …un communicable. Your pathway seems out of the ordinary.
Again on a tangent, to associate capable individuals, a “potential” elite, to build an in group that matters, could be the core of innovation, the thing AI (a force multiplier of dream inducing), genetics of biology (a possible make-over of the human hardware, not sure if this comes to realize and how, the knowledge part does not match the low side of teaching about it) to throw the dream against…
Always within your terminology …could produce “the next dream” (as compared to Washington speak of “the next big thing”), standing a chance to make reality better then it’s sublimation. The reverse is tested and true, a reality that needs sublimation to make it comestible, there is no lack of it.
Ultimately a reduction of the world population, social engineering, at best, if not plain brute, as to individual engineering, is nothing else then another case of dream thinking, regardless of acceptable tools to make the case in practical terms.
Darwin is probably the most mainstream example of thinking out of the blue, the dream, and being pulled into science. There should indeed be some out of the blue, “ex-nihilo”, conceptualizing, and it needs majoring comprehension, a rewiring of “elite” and “public” alike. You made a best case for dreaming.
As for us, having tasted a glimpse of your express venue ways, they stand!
“Damn, but this hillside is cold!”
Thanks, Peter.
The above is not a bad analysis, and applies to the failure of the Soviet Union. It is expressed in fairly complex English syntax, and much of it is allusion.
It does not entirely describe the present situation, however.
Till there, we concur, and thanks for pasting some coherence back onto the initial comment. Again, to “understand” an argument, the explaining, and the capacity to absorb of the audience is almost a half – half equation. The general strategy used by public writing is to bow to the latter, thus taking out all added value and bow to convention “with a twist”. If one prefers, public writing is about page-views, Patreon, selling out at the right moment and time to some opportunistic worldview. Not envisioning anything in a “new” way, adding some insight out of the conventional, elaborate status-quo.
As to the second part of your comment, below “present situation”, we cannot stat, this needs more discussion, and background. “Are you capable to put some coherence of your own?”. Glad to have your quality comment attached to ours.
The above is not a bad analysis, and applies to the failure of the Soviet Union. It is expressed in fairly complex English syntax, and much of it is allusion.
It does not entirely describe the present situation, however.
Till there, we concur, and thanks for pasting some coherence back onto the initial comment. Again, to “understand” an argument, the explaining, and the capacity to absorb of the audience is almost a half – half equation. The general strategy used by public writing is to bow to the latter, thus taking out all added value and bow to convention “with a twist”. If one prefers, public writing is about page-views, Patreon, selling out at the right moment and time to some opportunistic worldview. Not envisioning anything in a “new” way, adding some insight out of the conventional, elaborate status-quo.
As to the second part of your comment, below “present situation”, we cannot stat, this needs more discussion, and background. “Are you capable to put some coherence of your own?”. Glad to have your quality comment attached to ours.
None of this should be a surprise. The sad truth: the central political question in all Western societies is—how far will the masses be able to control the naturally-abusive tendencies of the elite?
Best conclusion possible, a needed conclusion to make sense of all and anything. Logical consequence, real journalism, media is meant to reverse engineer the layers of deceit imposed by any local power elites where-ever on the globe. That means independent financing, independent organizing, having more analytical and synthetical ability then the power elites, and steering the output over covert channels where the analysis can be put into action. Real guerilla war tactics.
Consequently again, real decisions will be global, regardless, whether the concerned decision makers are the commoner or the elites. Such a shame that the French intent on speaking truth to power is not seen in this light by the global masses. Should we say, “the deplorable thinks “local”, the elites think “global”.
Another consequence is the answer as to the potential of the local elites all over the globe, to quality steering. Not much, not well coordinated, big derivatives, restricted variables control. Seems the only thing the elites of power are capable of is beating the slur of the deplorables. “Man beats man, but cannot thump it’s nose as to the wider environment.” No value in historical models any longer, call them folklore. Post-history has arrived indeed,
And, especially, my bold:
Logical consequence, real journalism, media is meant to reverse engineer the layers of deceit imposed by any local power elites where-ever on the globe. That means independent financing, independent organizing, having more analytical and synthetical ability then the power elites, and steering the output over covert channels where the analysis can be put into action. Real guerilla war tactics.
Consequently again, real decisions will be global, regardless, whether the concerned decision makers are the commoner or the elites.
The crux of the matter.
...such a shame that the French intent on speaking truth to power is not seen in this light by the global masses. Should we say, “the deplorable thinks “local”, the elites think “global”.
I never believed that. The quality of a political regime matters (otherwise the GDR would have been as prosperous as the FRG, and North Korea would be as good as South Korea). A skilled person should have the right to take his business elsewhere.
The big problem with bringing in only skilled immigrants with no cap is that it causes a brain drain on those countries losing their smartest citizens – the ones who could most help them if they stayed at home.
Remember that another country will still take them (Canada, Australia, etc.), so they will still leave their original country.
Global problems are hard to solve by thinking US. The main flaw of the article.
This article misses important dimensions of the immigration issue:
Indeed. Some more arguments, to consider, to be influencing any immigration strategy. The long term, of course, the planetary situation, a global population beyond allowable limits, a need for industrial work-forces shrinking below a fraction of work forces offered. Global financialization. The disregard of “bright” individuals for systemic and conceptual, goal seeking strategies, aloft from historical models and out of “ex nihilo”. As sophisticated as the article might be, by omission, rather binary.
In the first place, can the US territory at all be considered as a viable political entity, since the variables that constitute it’s composure are to be found outside of it’s borders, outside of it’s influence. Immigration might be best tweaked by solving and tweaking global variables. Immigration to the US, is a minor issue. Causation from an untenable, quality wise, and growing out of proportions, global population is one of the majoring issues.
The graph.
Globbing Whites, and globbing Jews along age, without consideration for class and gender pulled in the picture, means little.
The Jew stances change, has started by WASP-elites, selling out to Jew money power. A Jew being a Jew, he will see opportunity into the “other” side. Of course that effect propagating into the younger generations first. It is a matter of base short-term opportunities, to bet both sides in politics. How will the Jew troll along his long-term instincts of in-group behavior? Probably by marrying into and mixing with the conservative side on the basis of Jew male and Gentile bride for the elites, and the middle class Jew soliciting that newer power group for opportunity.
Changes are taking place, not to be interpreted in the suggested way.
In our opinion, denouncing does not cut it. In a practical sense, since the playing field is trip-wired, the Jew does not play along by the rules (nor does any other group, most have in-group attitudes, including the “old-boys” networks), the suggestion should be that Whites who matter should adhere to some Jew method and sense, and shelve the guilt, strive for equality, the ideas in short of Christianity and Enlightenment (theoretically superior most probably), until they get back to dominance.
An yet, here we are, “subscriptions” to a Jew cluster to express findings that contradict the very basis of reasonable opposition. All reproaches made to the Jew, the international Jew, stealth with regard to his individual identity, his outcry as a collective, on command, and proven age-old tactics, his in-group handling of internal problems, should be rather adopted.
The secondary problems, White trash, a middle class, whoring as never, as long as White elites can come to some coherent strategy, the latter problems will not surpass the givens and strive within the Jewish group.
In all, your emotional disdain, your disdain of emotion in producing knowledge. As across the body of your comments.
You are on to something, many times over, the world needs more of your mindset. When success is a numbers game, what matters is lonely. You must be ignored, hated at the best, and that does not matter.
Are you able to write coherently, or are you just lazy?
Since some frameworks are bigger then others, coherence is a relative thing. If you prefer, it is often not the argument, but the audience that matters or in most cases, not at all. Or, to put it differently, when a reader turns “fish-eye”, is it the writer at stake?
We suggest to glance at or scan partly, our commenting body, the bits of text it relates to (often not very coherent, pertinent, complete or relevant in the first place), and start talking coherence from there.
As always, our compliments, it is a daring thing to be outspoken, but one cannot well judge the man by the single comment. As some-one else posted these same days, “You are so startlingly moronic”. That to us suggesting a homogeneous state of mind, be it inclined to the downside.
To a certain extend, there will be distinctions between Whites, of course, what deems as being impossible is to provide within the existing methodologies and historical models for an eight billion plus global population. There will not be ongoing development, but convergence to the bottom as can be seen. The choice is going to be qualitative, what will prevail, as a solid, durable base to build upon. Nations, religion, class, or race. The elites of today bet on class, a global ruling class and consequently a global ghetto for the deplorable, the all-color proletarians, the whatever religeous zealots, the consumer zumby (a living dead consumer). They succeeded pretty well.
The alternative to a ghetto existence, within the confines of pollution, toxicity, veganism and crappy housing for the commoner might be to bet on race, call the elites out on loyalty to their own on the basis of race. Very Jewish, and illustrative to the negative as done by Blacks.
The commoner cannot tolerate his own elites selling out, and this without regard for nation borders. That is what the Whites of the middle class and the straight thinking outliers at the bottom are up against.
The underlying yardstick, being GDP, what a joke? The author’s mind of measure, that is where all should start. It seems to us that the author’s champions are pulling the periphery into further decay.
His measures of success seem to be contradicted by the moment in history. Linearity has stopped, Fukushima of Harvard funded, was right minus “linear”. The end of linear history has happened indeed, hence the conventional measuring stick, and the tricking of the statistics, even at their own defined values by ditto champions, can be thrown out. To pick a single bone… by their own rules and intentions, the EU playing fair?
We are sorry to see so many intellectuals into this kind of groove thinking, trying to capitalize on the lie they absorbed with zest over their carreer, and now see no alternative but to persist out of opportunism. Some data present must raise the question of foul play, do they not? …so many conventional dogmas must raise a doubt in the most average of minds or not?
To make a case against such nonsense means getting blue in the face.
Quite sorry but the mud remains…
Glanced over your comment body, some very interesting hind-sights on historical sources.
Mostly agree. See our ditto sequel comment on attitudes to be adopted openly, covertly and significantly.
Clear as mud, but I always admire people who know the intentions of other people.Replies: @m___
our first impression, basically a majority Jew cluster, regardless of the stances promoted. Secondly unz.com being intent on masking this phenomenon to the outsider, while promoting it to the insider
Clear as mud,
To scrape away some of the mud, it seems to us that the “problem” should be a simple con-stat.
Either Whites agree on denouncing the other (Jew, Muslim, Black, Hispanic, Chinese…) his in-group attitudes, which did not, does not work, (it is not hard to agree upon)
…or Whites step away from ignoring that all other groups do have in-group attitudes, prevailing over family, tribe, class, territory, and religion. These and other factors (age, gender, on a per individual basis) cause endless possibilities of break lines according to any situation, any moment in time. The duck and weave of boxing. Confusing most men-brains into pulp. Including the corrupting of White individuals as straw men drivingJewish in-group interests, away from their prime group interests, since these academics and power players, cannot understand that they thus undermine their long-time credibility and power base (hence Trump-y phenomenons occurring, as certain as climate change). It simply is the Christian roots for one, the Enlightenment another, that equality is a bright light. And it could be, only such a strategy does not work when all other players, play foul.
Agreeing on deciding that all of the above factors are subject to there own Whiteness as a group foremost (not territory, not class, not religion, not age, not gender) should be a start. Thus leveling the playing field should be the strategy and goal of our Whites that can and would dominantly matter, not denouncing the foul play, but changing the rules. As greed is good in capitalism, one cannot fight in-group attitudes but with equal arms. As to Blacks, Muslims, their in-group attitudes reflect the more primitive extroverts of crime, and breeding wars, less dangerous then the Jewish sophistication of operating media, finance and any key fields that reshuffle society, the social texture and structure of it, in the West. The last strategy as an over-layer, co-opting the more primitive group cohesions of Blacks and name it, is deadly.
The interesting sub-note, is that Jews between each other submit to any individual abuse as such as secondary to being and belonging as a Jew. The equivalent would be the White Anglo Saxon elites of the US not selling out to the Jewish money power as individuals, regardless of their disdain for the white trash, the deplorable, class phenomena. A touch of Jew is what fails the White middle classes and elites dearly.
Did we forget to mention the Chinese?
To get back to the article. The bottom line indeed is talent, White talent. If not present then let’s shop elsewhere. A very Jewish attitude to be adopted by Whites if they want to return to significance.
If the article is about statistical truth
…then the article has it right.
That has consequences, they should be accepted, on the basis of meritocracy and the common good. It would have been a good thing that academic achievement would cross the lines of group segregation, and cluster around achievement for the exceptions on merit, not emotion, and political shaping. That would mean the occasional Black fully integrated into the majority group of whatever racial group prevails. This sadly is not going to happen outside the working environment, since many other factors define group segregation outside of IQ and academic prowess. As a matter of fact, IQ, academic prowess, is pulled into group environments by the group majority mostly, seldom at the choice of the individual, and it is the group that sets the general score of factoring. IQ does not scale well, academic achievement is a lonely task.
It seems that also with regard to Jew and White the same phenomenon of in-group first, plays out. Take our cherished unz.com environment, to our first impression, basically a majority Jew cluster, regardless of the stances promoted. Secondly unz.com being intent on masking this phenomenon to the outsider, while promoting it to the insider. We would like to see the “graph” of the larger collaborators and subcontracted services individuals, people involved in it’s financing, with the mention of who is Jewish and who is not. As to the commenters and readers, the peanut gallery, they seem to be dominantly White, above thirty years of age, and just gut feeling, above fifty years of age. Again that makes for in-group attitudes, being different. Christianity could explain that mindset probably.
Of course that leaves “Jewish” to be defined. Not an easy thing since it seems harder to measure then IQ since there is no definition of “Jew” outside of a pertinent as convenient context, which gives us, admittedly trouble to make any statement. The not clearly defining Jew, being a design feature, not a bug, and not on our side.
To get back to the piece and it’s author, Robert Weissberg, segregation, a natural defensive mechanism, should be lived with, since it is the broader human nature, and is manifest in all, Black, White, and Jew. The last group in the article conveniently left out.
Working environments though, as academia, power-circles in general, opinion-makers, should be willing to accept the occasional Black, Jew, or Whitey in the whatever majority defined group supposedly, to collaborate on the basis of higher level opportunism, rationality, best advanced on the basis of merit. unz.com seems to allow for such. On the downside, for every Jewish contributor on unz.com there should not necessarily be a better writer, alas researcher, outside of the group. Making who does the writing, trivial to interchanges. On the upside, even if there were distinct outsiders to the dominating in-group, the kind of writing would make it trivial. Since success is measured in page-views, as such, fringe ideas and detail would hardly correspond to a first necessity.
Clear as mud, but I always admire people who know the intentions of other people.Replies: @m___
our first impression, basically a majority Jew cluster, regardless of the stances promoted. Secondly unz.com being intent on masking this phenomenon to the outsider, while promoting it to the insider
“working”
By giving importance to your job, you must be realizing that almost all of your energy and time is channeled into the system, the elites, whatever their values. And you Sir, are left with your sorry bones in case the systemics are tricked against you. Better decide early on. A part time dissident, often heard of, call it templative minded. Sounds like working for Monsanto, and shopping for biological food to power your exertions.
You could be onto something here.
As it is, any catastrophe is a step toward a possible space to breath.
Thanks for one more fun scenario.
Where China goes wrong, is wrong enough as to pull the rest of the globe into the loosers they are, twice over. Environmental dis-concern, growth economics, financialization, are the better tools too wreak havoc. Now it being the Chinese to lead the US, China and Russia doing the dancing, that should represent no matter of substance. Emotion aside, their logic is not new.
IQ is abhorred, worldwide, when on the right side of the tale (and tail), and out of any local context. Elites as we know, and admire, and on the other side, fringe IQ, do not match smart enough and power of emotion (even politicians have better looks then the aces of math). Using these high IQ critters, as the US does, to build tools to star in dumb systemic scenarios, is what China seems to do better these days. As even Russia does better these days. Again, no matter of substance. A non-situation.
The sarcasm is off, “the alcoholic does not care, whether it is Whiskey or Whine that kills the liver and spine”. Seriously limited sarcasm, since there is only one side to the whole of the equation: not smart enough.