RSSWhat kind of establishment hack would write this gibberish in light of this election being obviously fraudulent..
Sometimes the simplest explanation is the best.
In Minnesota, even before the plandemic changes, voter fraud was much easier to commit than in Wisconsin. Ballot harvesting has, for decades, been all but legal in Minnesota.
That, plus the plandemic changes, made it easy for Biden to increase his vote margins over Hillary.
Norwegians in Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin all swung hard to Trump.
Some of you guys really need to pay attention to the Texas suit, and to what Robert Barnes says.
I haven’t been on Unz in a while, by the way. Are you guys still pretending that Biden actually won in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, and Georgia? That’s so cute.
If you want to fix things, then start by not blaspheming, you fink.
Thanks as usual, Fox, and please see:https://carolynyeager.net/frau-haverbeck-berlin-court-%E2%80%9Ci-consider-procedure-highly-questionable%E2%80%9Dhttps://carolynyeager.net/ursula-haverbeck-sentenced-another-year-prison-video-played-youtubeplus another one on the way. I consider Eric Striker's article only a beginning.Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
Ursula Haverbeck is a human being of outstanding moral fibre, inner strength and daring
I consider Eric Striker’s article only a beginning.
Thanks, Carolyn.
Carolyn’s coverage of this is more thorough, and has been consistent. Plus, unlike Striker, Carolyn isn’t a never-Trump wignat lockdown lover like the rest of the TRS crew in general.
Hat Tips –> Anon[314], Jack D., Ali Choudhury
(There own words and ideas, which are relevant here and make critical points)
The huge numbers of absentee votes have thrown conservatives for a loop, because they’ve made the vote counting process much less intuitive than it was in previous elections. The procedures for counting the absentee votes vary substantially between states, between counties in the same state, and even between municipalities in the same county. So the timing and granularity of vote count reports was different from one place to the next, generating suspicion and confusion.
The confusion was exacerbated because it just took way longer to count the vastly larger numbers of these ballots. Laws that absentee ballots could not be counted before election day suddenly were much more relevant and resulted in delayed reporting. Some of these “late night vote dumps” were in fact reports of votes counted by large numbers of people working continuously from the moment they were legally allowed to start counting. It just took them a long time to finish.
The real story may turn out to be that mass absentee balloting is just inherently better for the Democrats. It will be hard to put that genie back into the bottle. [And] Trump knew that the mail in votes favored Democrats so even before the election he started sowing [doubt] about them, knowing that in the swing states he would “win” on election night and then lose later on once the absentee ballots were counted.
The problem with this is that, despite all the hand waving, no one has any substantial proof that this actually happened on a large scale. If there was some kind of vast conspiracy, someone would have talked by now. All the “evidence” offered by Trump and by conspiracy theorists here and elsewhere has not really panned out or was just blowing smoke to begin with. It is desirable to yell the election was stolen since it keeps the angry base more inclined to give donations.
That is my impression, too.
If there was some kind of vast conspiracy, someone would have talked by now. All the “evidence” offered by Trump and by conspiracy theorists here and elsewhere has not really panned out or was just blowing smoke to begin with.
After a Democrat has purposely arranged matters to make it impractical or impossible to detect whether he cheats, one may reasonably assume that he cheats.Would one agree to play tennis with these Democrats? No? Why not?Because they hit the ball out while insisting that it was in and then, when you object, start cutting holes in the net.I did not even especially want Donald Trump to win reëlection (though I did vote for him), but this election has been unfair on multiple levels. The whole four years of resistance against Trump has been unfair—not just to him but to the millions of us that felt in 2016 that we had no one else to whom to turn. Trump is vulgar, undisciplined, incontinent and fat; but the Russia hoax, the Ukraine impeachment and the COVID election swindle have all been undeserved.It's not right. Why should I be happy about it? Democracy requires opponents that are moderately sportsmanlike and are willing to play by the rules.Replies: @Corvinus
The problem with this is that, despite all the hand waving, no one has any substantial proof that this actually happened on a large scale.
Let me ask you: if there is no problem with signature matching, then why have county and state officials in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Nevada refused to let signatures be matched?And why, exactly, was it necessary for the Pennsylvania Secretary of State - in defiance of PA state law - to order counties to cure ballots, accept late ballots, accept unverified ballots, and commit various other infractions of that state's laws? Why did Democrats in Wayne County feel obliged to threaten officials who demanded an audit?
The huge numbers of absentee votes have thrown conservatives for a loop, because they’ve made the vote counting process much less intuitive than it was in previous elections.
This is a thoroughly faggoty claim. https://hereistheevidence.com/
The problem with this is that, despite all the hand waving, no one has any substantial proof that this actually happened on a large scale.
My gosh, this is asinine. They did not work continuously. They stopped the count, for hours at a time, or days in the case of Nevada.
It just took them a long time to finish.
Do you know how a criminal conspiracy works?Moreover, it doesn't take a "vast conspiracy" to harvest or fraudulently submit enough ballots to make a dent in a race. It takes what happened in, say, Pennsylvania: state officials tacitly legalizing ballots that are IMPOSSIBLE TO VERIFY. That allows for very local people in Democrat counties to submit fraudulent ballots without having to talk to anyone else.It's been three weeks. How long did it take us to find out what happened with 9/11, or with the Kennedy assassination? A lot longer than three weeks. Gee, I wonder if that's why courts and Biden are trying to run out the clock?You also have no ability to answer the statistical impossibilities.Replies: @Corvinus, @A123, @iffen
If there was some kind of vast conspiracy, someone would have talked by now.
Those people you cite are wrong, if these are actually their ideas.
The huge numbers of absentee votes have thrown conservatives for a loop, because they’ve made the vote counting process much less intuitive than it was in previous elections.
Let me ask you: if there is no problem with signature matching, then why have county and state officials in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Nevada refused to let signatures be matched?
And why, exactly, was it necessary for the Pennsylvania Secretary of State – in defiance of PA state law – to order counties to cure ballots, accept late ballots, accept unverified ballots, and commit various other infractions of that state’s laws? Why did Democrats in Wayne County feel obliged to threaten officials who demanded an audit?
The problem with this is that, despite all the hand waving, no one has any substantial proof that this actually happened on a large scale.
This is a thoroughly faggoty claim. https://hereistheevidence.com/
It just took them a long time to finish.
My gosh, this is asinine. They did not work continuously. They stopped the count, for hours at a time, or days in the case of Nevada.
If there was some kind of vast conspiracy, someone would have talked by now.
Do you know how a criminal conspiracy works?
Moreover, it doesn’t take a “vast conspiracy” to harvest or fraudulently submit enough ballots to make a dent in a race. It takes what happened in, say, Pennsylvania: state officials tacitly legalizing ballots that are IMPOSSIBLE TO VERIFY. That allows for very local people in Democrat counties to submit fraudulent ballots without having to talk to anyone else.
It’s been three weeks. How long did it take us to find out what happened with 9/11, or with the Kennedy assassination? A lot longer than three weeks. Gee, I wonder if that’s why courts and Biden are trying to run out the clock?
You also have no ability to answer the statistical impossibilities.
Why did I illustrate North Carolina? Well, in Pennsylvania, the State Supreme Court concluded that there was no clause in the state’s election code that allowed ballots to be rejected based on signature comparisons, and if the state’s lawmakers wanted one, they would have included it. “It is not our role under our tripartite system of governance to engage in judicial legislation and to rewrite a statute in order to supply terms which are not present therein, and we will not do so in this instance,” the court wrote.What about Georgia? Well, under state law, the identification or signature of voters is checked twice during the absentee voting process, and an accepted ballot can’t be traced back to a signed envelope once the two are separated. The process protects ballot secrecy.
In Wisconsin, "You don’t need to worry about if your signature is going to match and making your signature perfect," Magney explained. "That’s not what we do in Wisconsin, when you request an absentee ballot, you provide a copy of your photo ID and that’s our security involved in it."In North Carolina, the executive director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, wrote in a memo to all local county boards that a voter's signature "shall not be compared with the voter's signature on file because this is not required by North Carolina law. County boards shall accept the voter's signature on the container-return envelope if it appears to be made by the voter, meaning the signature on the envelope appears to be the name of the voter and not some other person. Absent clear evidence to the contrary, the county board shall presume that the voter's signature is that of the voter, even if the signature is illegible."
This rumor referenced a claim that computer servers belonging to the Dominion Voting Systems and/or Scytl Secure Electronic Voting companies had supposedly been seized by the U.S. Army in Frankfurt, Germany, and the served data showed that Trump had actually won a landslide victory in the Nov. 3 election. The rumor was one no reliable news outlet gave any credence to, but nonetheless, the far-right, pro-Donald Trump OANN cable channel devoted some airtime to it, as narrated by U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas…Indeed, the claim echoed by Gohmert was a completely fabricated one. In response to that rumor, Scytl noted that they had no servers or offices in Frankfurt, nor had anything of theirs been seized from them by the U.S. military.
By the way, the Wall Street Journal claimed that bellwether accuracy inexplicably fell apart this year because of “polarization.”
This is one of the worst and most amateurish explanations, perhaps in all of human history.
1) Why were bellwethers of sterling accuracy in 2016? You mean to say that 2016 wasn’t equally, or nearly as, polarized as 2020? Absurd.
2) Why were bellwethers accurate in 1860? 1860 was so polarized (far more than 2020, no matter what anyone says) that Lincoln wasn’t even on the ballot in more than a fourth of the US!!
No, the only two times bellwether states or counties have been thrown off have been 1960 and 2020. In 1960 (the last time Florida and Ohio were both “wrong”), you had two mobbed up candidates, and bellwethers reflected that by falling to around 50% accurate. In 2020, you had a candidate (Trump) who was pretty strong despite being fairly inept and a candidate (Biden) who was just straight up cheating like Hell. And that’s why bellwether accuracy was implausibly bad for the first time ever.
You’d have to be a nut to deny the fraud.
I’ll wait till Richard Baris weighs in, but I have a dang hard time believing that independents broke hard for Trump in Florida, Iowa, and Ohio but not Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. It makes zero sense; it’s never happened before either. Independents in Florida, a state mixed between Southerners and cultural Easterners, are representative of independents in Georgia as well as PA an the Midwest. Independents in Iowa are representative of Wisconsin, and the rest of the Midwest. Independents in Ohio are representative of PA. The very idea that Iowa and Ohio could break hard one way, cutting totally against WI, MI, and PA is completely unprecedented and statistically hokum.
These states always go close together. Now, Ohio’s tendencies are a bit goofy, but they’re at least clear: when it goes Republican, it usually goes by several points. When it goes Democrat, it usually goes by a very close margin. But, either way, the rest of the Big Ten country follows it closely. When Ohio is a big Republican blowout, PA is a close Republican win. This year makes zero sense, and I find it basically impossible that Mahoning County and Lorain County would flip red while Trump (supposedly) lost some ground in parts of rural western PA while also losing Erie. These voters represent each other! But the reason is obvious: Ohio has cleaned up its voting act in Cleveland, etc, while the PA State Supreme Court and Secretary of State basically legalized mail-in fraud.
On that note, just yesterday the PA State Supreme Court ruled that it’s okay for ballots to be illegal as long as they’re illegal in a “technical” sense. https://triblive.com/local/pa-supreme-court-says-undated-mail-in-ballots-in-ziccarelli-case-can-be-counted/
And that’s before I get to a whole host of other statistical impossibilities that happened in 2020, and 2020 alone. My personal favorite being the fact that black turnout was meh pretty much everywhere except for, you know, the most important cities in GA, PA, WI, and MI. There it was higher than it was for Obama. This from a demographic that is HIGHLY representative of itself nationwide, and which has NEVER acted that way before.
Tell you something else: right now I’m working on figuring out bellwether county accuracy in the 1960 election. I think it’s gonna be around 5o to 60%. That’s really bad; the 150 or so best bellwether counties usually average around 85%, and the best average over 98%. But it would make sense for them to go to about 50% in 1960, because JFK and Nixon were both mobbed up an both were stealing votes; JFK stole Texas and Chicago, and Nixon was very good friends with Santo Trafficante in Florida and Mickey Cohen in LA.
This year we had the 19 most accurate counties (since 1980) go 1/18, with the 1 being a Washington state county that probably had an influx of wealthy liberals escaping the chaos of Seattle. And the 174 most accurate counties since 1976 dropped from an average of 85% to 16%. Simply amazing that anyone could believe this crap.
In reality, in a fair election, Trump probably loses NH and MN, but he wins NV (even with the fraud, NV voted well to the right of the national average), MI (by a close margin), WI, and PA – the latter by at least 100,000 votes. AZ, I think, would have been close since voter registration trends within the 2016-20 cycle favored Dems there. Also, the AZ Democrats brilliantly put weed on the ballot.
Speaking of voter registration trends, those are highly predictive and have pretty much never have been wrong – you know, except for this year, in like 4 states. Ridiculous – how could anyone believe this nonsense?
Sorry for the length, sorta, but it was worth it.
I don’t believe this article, partly because it ignores the voter fraud, partly because it totally ignores the statistical impossibility of various aspects of this election (Trump dominated Florida and Ohio and won 18 of the 19 most accurate bellwether counties (1980) and yet somehow “lost” overall – this is a statistical fluke beyond all reason), and partly because I personally know no fewer than 10 working class white people who did not vote for Trump in 2016 but did this year. I even know 3 white libertarians who voted for him.
While I agree that this article largely stinks, Trump did do some good things along the lines of the Sailer Strategy. Notably, the administration cut immigration in half.
Since 1980, out of the thousands of counties in the US, 19 counties have gotten the Electoral College right in every election.
The other real question is, why do Biden’s results only or primarily violate it in the controversial swing states, plus Chicago (which has a certain tradition of voter fraud)?
As for PA, you can’t just look at Philly, by the way. This was a statewide scam here.
Since 1980, out of the thousands of counties in the US, 19 counties have gotten the Electoral College right.
This year, we’re expected to believe only 1 was right.
We’re also expected to believe that the average accuracy of the most 174 accurate bellwether counties (since 1976) could also plummet from 85% accurate to 16% accurate.
The main stream (Wall Street Journal) explanation for this is that the country has become too polarized for these bellwether counties to matter much. That, of course, is a total crock – why they were all right in 2016, when the country was hardly less polarized?
That, plus the fact that the last time an election featured one candidate losing despite winning both Ohio and Florida was 1960, which was our most recent aggressively stolen election.
But Sam Giancana had a funny way of helping out in karma’s reward for JFK.
There was no moment. Christian leadership failed this country.
The Romans knew better.
You’re an idiot. Even a cursory glance at American history can disprove you. WE HAVEN’T HAD CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP.
That is, even if one assumes that Christian leadership would fail, you’re still an idiot, because America simply hasn’t had such leadership around to fail or succeed.
An instructive 2016 article from the BBC about fraudulent elections in Gabon.
Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190
But don’t worry, Anatoly, none of these signs were present in America …. oh wait, actually, ALL of them were present.
This article just restates establishment propaganda and warps it in snark. A waste of time.
If the graphs are real, they show pretty typical sampling randomness at the N-values they sampled at. Again, I'm eyeballing it here, but I have been the statistician looking for anomalies in the data. Google my name: I do shit like this for a living.
"If the graphs are real they show clear anomolies of the type that forensic accountants would consider signs of fraud."
I really don’t care who you are, Expert Scott. All anyone needs to know about this election is that we’re supposed to believe Biden did great in 4 urban areas while doing not so great in every other one. It’s absurd beyond belief.
Karlin, you are completely full of crap.
Biden severely under-performed Clinton’s results in every major urban area except Milwaukee, Detroit, Philly, and Atlanta. In those 4 areas he over-performed Clinton and Obama.
This is demographically improbable: all four areas are heavily black. Why did black voters elsewhere fail to respond like we’re supposed to believe they did in those 4? In reality, black voters are always representative of each other – and in the rest of the country, Trump increased his black male voter share to 18% and black turnout did not exceed the past.
This is statistically implausible, to put it mildly. Cleveland, which is basically the same city as Milwaukee but in a state run by a competent Secretary of State (Ohio’s Frank LaRose), saw a flat turnout.
As for Pennsylvania, if nothing sordid was happening, then the state’s Democrats would not have fought like Hell to prevent the Trump campaign from observing the vote count. Nor would the Democrat-run state courts have come with the absurd rulings allowing ballots to be counted days after election day, without any proof of authenticity!
You are the cope artist. You may be right about the difficulty of proving it in court, but this election is a clear fraud.
%vote for Trump:
Biden severely under-performed Clinton’s results in every major urban area except Milwaukee, Detroit, Philly, and Atlanta.
Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major urban area except Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Detroit.
NOTHING TO SEE HERE, FOLKS.
The part about Rove’s chicanery in Florida may be true, but the media also deliberately suppressed Republican votes in the Florida Panhandle.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/polls-are-closed-they-lied/
Ultimately, I’d say these things offset.
Don’t you have observers from both parties in each precinct controlling the vote counting?
Not necessarily. In Michigan, Gretchen Whitmer forcibly removed GOP observers from offices in Detrot, citing COVID concerns. Meanwhile, the Democrat-controlled and immensely corrupt PA State Supreme Court ruled that the Trump campaign has no inherent right to observe counts in Philadelphia.
The bigger problem is that our media is completely controlled by the enemies of the American people.
Exactly.
The bigger problem is that our media is completely controlled by the enemies of the American people.
Steve,
https://twitter.com/GregAbbott_TX/status/1324578495591337984
Moreover, we could ask, why in the world did Cleveland not take forever to report? Could it be that Frank LaRose is a better Secretary of State than the SPLC woman running Michigan’s vote? What about big cities in New York, or even Chicago this year – it’s almost as if it happened only in big cities in competitive states.
P.S. I’m proud of you for questioning the narrative.
It’s incredible how many people on Unz are burying their heads in the sand.
Screw you, Striker.
The massive fraud going on proves that there is something good in Donald Trump, otherwise the Democrats would not be trying so desperately to cheat.
You’ve criticized the mainstream Republican Party – mostly for good reason – yet you’ll doubtless take nothing away from the fact that Mitch McConell is standing by silently as an election is stolen by the Jews.
Kevin MacDonald’s post a few weeks ago about the importance of a Trump win was ignored by you goofs at TRS. Maybe you should stop hanging out with federal informants like Cantwell.
This is a great article by Dr. MacDonald.
The comments are pathetic. Pathetic! Do you really think a Trump victory is irrelevant? If it was irrelevant, then the elites would not be pulling out all the stops to try and stop him!
You sadsacks! He may be a goof, but he’s cut immigration in half! No one else has done that. And that’s just the starting point.
Get out and vote for the President!
Talk is cheap; nobody's actually trying to stop him. The impeachment proceedings were pure political theater and there was never any meaningful political opposition to any of his more controversial acts, e.g. trade war, exiting the JCPOA agreement, INF treaty, etc.
The comments are pathetic. Pathetic! Do you really think a Trump victory is irrelevant? If it was irrelevant, then the elites would not be pulling out all the stops to try and stop him!
The problem with Audacious Epigone’s original post is the crap about how Trump hasn’t done anything for us.
Forget the wall, people! Are you boomers so blind that you think a wall is more important than what Trump has actually done, namely cutting immigration in half in 4 years???!
Pennsylvania is still in the bottom half of states in per capita immigration. Of large states, only Ohio is lower and Michigan tied. Penna. is half as foreign-born as the US as a whole. So if it's bad there, imagine everywhere else.
You have no idea what you’re talking about.
I live in southeastern PA. Have for almost my whole life.
That's what the kid from Portland told me 30 years ago when I dismissed the crime problems in his hometown. Compared to what, though? He expected me to believe that it was Washington-on-the-Willamette.Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
You have no idea what you’re talking about.
I’m a native Pennsylvanian.
President Trump’s doing fine here among his base and enthusiasm is decently high among cucky Republicans.
Biden is definitely popular in places like Luzerne County. His whole bullshit act of pretending to be a Pennsylvanian is popular with some old people.
I think the southeast and northeast will turn out better for Biden than it did for Clinton, while the west and center will go strongly for Trump. Trump is just now starting to campaign hard here.
Those guys are all jagoffs.
I answer Woody Hayes.
Woody was a strong proponent of the counter-revolution and a good man.
(I am not an Ohio State fan – in fact I refer to them as Wexner State – but I am a Woody Hayes fan)
Here he calls out the liberals and teaches the importance of team effort.
Yes, lots of bands dressed like fags in the '80s, ostensibly to get chicks.
TL:DR;
Pantera mostly seemed obsessed with weed and drinking themselves to death. They made the most impressive turn around from their hair metal days.
Mrs. Abe was hotter than any chick who ever so much as touched the weenie of a member of Pantera.
Yes, lots of bands dressed like fags in the ’80s, ostensibly to get chicks.
Proof that doing anything to get a woman is not worth it.
You are correct. Van Halen, and all that other crap, is nothing but a bunch of demonic cacophony.
To paraphrase Howlin’ Wolf, the makers thereof should take their wah wah pedals, and their Jewish attitude toward masculinity, and throw it all in the lake – on their way to the barber shop.
Griffin supported the lockdowns. Anglin did not. For this reason alone, those who say Griffin is smarter are totally wrong.
Carlton’s a great blogger, and his Tales of The American Empire series on YouTube is outstanding, but this post here is hokum.
Thanks!
Monika Schaefer…
Ursula Haverbeck…
Sylvia Stolz…
Ernst Zundel…
…and many others who DARE to question that “holiest of holy” jewish hoaxes–the jewish “holocaust”…all have been imprisoned for their thoughts.
A “war of words” can work. It is long overdue to “take the narrative” away from those who would harm us and have Israel’s interests take precedence over what is good for the United States.
Whenever I write about the “jewish question” and jewish influence in the United States, I always use the term: “loyalty oath to a foreign country” to explain the collusion with jews and Israel by our traitorous politicians. The message is one that is valid and is getting across.
A suggestion:
Make leaflets with pictures of Monika Schaefer, Ursula Haverbeck, Sylvia Stolz, with the question: “Q: Why were these grandmothers imprisoned? A: for questioning certain aspects of the “holocaust”, and then hand them to visitors to the various “holocaust museums” around the country.
You can bet that the local media will soon get involved, especially if the curators of these taxpayer-supported “freak shows” involve the authorities to “find out who is disseminating this hateful material”.
It is time to take the fight to our oppressors…
Or better yet, take up the challenge Handsome Truth and the GDL have just issued to all goys in America. On October 2, they are calling for a nation-wide banner drop with the words “Why Are Jews Banning Free Speech?”
A suggestion:
Make leaflets with pictures...
“The Holocaust is nothing more than anti-German hate propaganda masquerading as history.” – Ernst Zuendel
This is so pathetically boring. Big yawn. Business must be really really slow in the UK to write this article. Falls under the category of who cares. Furthermore no one really knows what anyone thinks in the US, never mind a millennial. The entire US is very fluid right now. Polling changes daily.
But lets look a moment Gilad at the outpouring of grief nationally for Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Not a wimmper of Jew hatred from the right or left. Ginsberg was a giant of a human being and Jurist. Every bit the Jew. You got a poll for that?
You strongly underestimate the importance of incumbent advantage in American presidential elections. The line about Biden not being Hillary is also a farcical exaggeration of Biden’s strength vis-a-vis the witch.
Since 1912, only 5 incumbents have sought reelection and not gotten it:
Taft lost in 1912 because Roosevelt ran a third party campaign.
Hoover lost in 1932 due to a Depression that was more easily blamed on him than Corona is on Trump, and secondly, due to a serious primary challenge from Calvin Coolidge.
Ford lost in 1976. He was never elected to start with, plus Watergate left a gigantic stink on the GOP, and he had a massive challenge from Reagan in the primary. Ford nearly won anyhow.
Carter in 1980 had about a million things wrong: The economy was trashy, the American problem in Iran was a disaster, and Ted Kennedy seriously challenged him in the primary.
Bush lost in 1992 after taking on a big challenge from Pat Buchanan. Bush had also stabbed his base in the back far worse than anything Trump’s done. And he still would have won massively if not for Ross Perot (for example, if you do the math, Bush very probably would have won such states as Oregon and Maine if not for Perot)
Anyhow, the three most consistent and strongest predictors of such things are the betting markets, the state of Ohio, and the stock market.
1) The betting markets are about even, but the majority of bets and individual bettors are going for Trump.
2) Ohio, the most accurate bellwether possibly in all of world democracy, leans towards Trump pretty solidly.
3) The stock market is currently up, and, anyway, Trump can’t be easily blamed for the economic disaster since it was Democrats (and foolish bloggers cough cough) who endorsed the insane and totally unprecedented idea that it’s okay to arbitrarily close small businesses while allowing massive Globoschomo corporations to have their way.
Then again, we live in a mentally ill* Jewish-dominated country where the election is decided by the dumbest 15ish% of people in a couple of states – people who will have trouble making up their minds until the week before the election. So anything can happen. But I’ll be praying that those dumb people make the right decision and, frankly, I suspect they will. As much as I personally am cynical about Trump, it’s so extremely obvious that the globalist scum, who love infanticide, want him out of office – if for no other reason than that he’s done a pretty good job, better than most, in reducing infanticide. Also, he’s cut legal immigration in half (sadly, his campaign is too stupid to tell this to the American people, because many of them would be excited if he emphasized it).
*1 in 5 Americans are mentally ill
I suspect that the DNC has been tampering to create "push markets", similar to "push polls". Especially in the less liquid, individual state results.
The betting markets are about even, but the majority of bets and individual bettors are going for Trump.
Herr Dinh,
Pardon my ignorance; having only begun reading your work over the last year or two, I am curious if you ever wrote anything about the American war with Vietnam. If so, where might I find it?
(I am very much of the opinion that the American war against Vietnam was one of the crudest and most absurdly dumb imperialist aggressions in the history of our corrupt pest elite, but I’ve yet to see what a Viet has to say about it all)
Thanks.
Also, apparently the shots often focus on the girls as they are ‘dancing’ in a way which meets the legal definition of child pornography and would not even have been permitted on an imageboard like 8chan. But I guess if its presented as just another insipid art film, then you can get some contrarians to shrug at it.
The producer was an Israeli.Every attempt to push what it is acceptable to depict is framed in the same way, as not endorsing but just investigating an important social question, because gullible people (like film critics and obviously AK) will fall for it.Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan, @Dreadilk
On that note, it is important to note that the director was not some Hollywood Weinstein, but a French-Senegalese woman called Maïmouna Doucouré
This post by Karlin is immensely gullible and cringe.
All right wingers who support abortion (and the lockdowns) are immensely short-sighted morons. Taking away the ability of dumb females and unscrupulous males to avoid the consequences of whoring will do drastically more to benefit society than a marginal fall in the number of blacks.
Barrett would be a nightmare.
The anti-abortion lunatics are all negroid lovers. Have you ever seen their signs whining about how many negroes are aborted?
You could be wrong, but it looks like no one here thinks so.Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
She sounds like a mushy-minded bleating heart type for whom “conservatism” is all about abortion, abortion, abortion (she’s a practicing Catholic). When it comes to heritage Americans and upholding their interests, I’m very suspicious about her bona fides (although I could be wrong).
I think he’s wrong. I also think he’s an idiot.
Away with thou, Satan!
I am a Roman Catholic. I also have two large problems with your post.
Well, it’s three, of course, not two, but we can agree to ignore my laughable typo if you stop saying “Shitler” like a kid.
I am a Roman Catholic. I also have two large problems with your post.
The first is your use of “Shitler” – what, are you 10 years old?
The second is your apparent ignorance of the fact that Hitler’s economic turnaround was actually far more successful than FDR’s.
And the third is your ignorance of how FDR won in 1940; he won in 1940 because Wendell Wilkie, the greatest stalking horse in history, stole the Republican nomination. It had been expected that one of several anti-interventionist candidates – Dewey, Taft, or Vandenburg – would win the nomination and give the American people a real choice between war and peace. Instead, Wilkie won it, under fairly mysterious circumstances. Afterwards, he all but openly ran a campaign of deliberate incompetence so that FDR would win. He then openly shared in a rather nauseating friendship with Roosevelt; the two shared complete agreement on the necessity of imperializing America, so, why not be buddies?
As for Hitler, I’ve always thought it was completely stupid for the NS administration to do things like banning crucifixes in Catholic schools, but I consider that more a remnant of Bismarck’s misguided* Kultur Kampf than something uniquely evil about Hitler. And, of course, Hitler later revoked that crucifix order! I also agree with those who say that Germany broke the Concordat before the Vatican did. With regard to eugenics, I would, as a dutiful Catholic, side with the bishops who publicly opposed certain aspects of the NS government’s program – but, again, Hitler revoked them! And finally, no one has yet to explain to my satisfaction why Bishop von Galen, who opposed Hitler in the area of euthanasia, nonetheless gave Operation Barbarossa his hearty apostolic blessing. Apparently Bishop von Galen understood the concept of prudence.
Compare Hitler, who largely revoked his state’s euthanasia plan at the protest of the Church, to America, which has aborted far more babies than the supposed 6 million victims of the so-called Holocaust! America’s “unspeakable crime” (to quote the Catholic catechism) of mass abortion dwarfs even the fake “crimes” of Nazi Germany, let alone any real ones!
The reality is that Nazi Germany absolutely met the criteria of what the Catholic Church would call a “duly constituted government” – meaning a German Catholic owed the state his loyalty, and most German Catholics gave their loyalty to it (excepting drunk skunks like Stauffenberg). And, despite its many flaws in the area of relations to the Church, it was neither the most ideologically reprehensible state in the war (that would be the USSR) nor was it the most perfidious (that would be England) or the biggest war criminal (that would be America). It was, in fact, on the correct side of the war, to the best of my judgment.
*Like many Protestant liberals, Bismarck misinterpreted Vatican 1. Prussia did eventually settle with the Church but the old northern German liberal attitudes resurfaced to some degree in a few influential members of the National Socialist movement.
Well, it's three, of course, not two, but we can agree to ignore my laughable typo if you stop saying "Shitler" like a kid.Replies: @ivan
I am a Roman Catholic. I also have two large problems with your post.
Despite my current illness (seasonal sinus headaches – it really sucks), I wanted to mention two factors as to why I believe there was a historical Jesus.
First, Tacitus’s Annals mention a Christus, who was executed by Pilate during the reign of Tiberius, and who gave his name to the Christians.
Tacitus openly despised Christianity and thus had no reason to defend the existence of the historical Jesus.
Tacitus had been Proconsul of Asia, where he surely would have encountered – and judged – many Christians and would have seen evidence about the historicity of Jesus.
Moreover, Tacitus is often regarded as the most accurate of Roman historians.
Second, as for Josephus, he mentions Jesus twice, once in incidental reference to James, the “brother” (more likely a cousin or half-brother) of Jesus. The way in which Josephus refers to this Jesus makes it clear that he has no doubts about the existence of Jesus. He is effectively making a reference to the then-universal knowledge of this man’s existence.
I should also add that the vast majority of non-Christian scholars – including atheists – agree that there was a real life Jesus.
For my money, John P. Meier’s A Marginal Jew series puts to bed any claims that there was no historical Jesus, in the sense that Father Meier does an excellent job of reviewing all the materials.
Keep in mind, however, that it’s been years since I’ve read it and I have a running headache so I’m not in the mood for long writing.
Never got into the whole rolling around with other sweaty dudes thing.
That’s a good cope to make you feel better about your inability or unwillingness to participate in the great but incredibly difficult sport of kings, wrestling.
This is very simple: either you admit that America has a very large share of people who live as parasites, in the literal and objective meaning of that word, or you are an idiot.
The third way, of course, is to be a sophist, which is what you’ve attempted so far.
(Let me remind you, since you’re apparently an arrogant person, that my country’s movie-making class has even lionized one group of parasites – the gangsters – with a veritable host of popular movies, from Goodfellas to the Godfather, with a few homages even to Old West parasites like Butch and Sundance.)
I don’t want to hear any of your insufferable crap about tone. Either you admit reality or you’re an idiot. To dissemble on the question, and give a bunch of empty-headed nonsense about tone, is the mark of a sophist.
He is not a sophist (at least not a very good one). He just loses all sense where my comments are concerned ever since he went deranged on me a while back and exposed himself as a crude, intemperate person. So he never passes up an opportunity to needle me whenever he thinks he has an opportunity to portray me as less than moral.
To dissemble on the question, and give a bunch of empty-headed nonsense about tone, is the mark of a sophist.
Well, that’s all fine and good, but is that what today’s youth are into? Do a little research like Carlton and get back to us?Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
It’s simply about being in the fresh air and sunshine with peers and activating vital hormones through shared practice and improved athleticism- running, jumping; also burning off other noisome hormones!
Well, that’s all fine and good, but is that what today’s youth are into?
I’m a youth. I’m into hunting and fishing. I love hiking above all. What about you?
The only reason many of them don’t do anything outdoors is because old fools like you don’t encourage them to do so!
I’m a young person, by the way.
Perhaps, but there are worse things than being an idiot.
As a frame of mind or political viewpoint, thinking of many of your fellow citizens as parasites is corrosive. It is not a way forward, except into a dark alley that has a dead end.
I think it’s more corrosive to be completely unable to deal with objective facts.
So, yes, you are worse than an idiot. Much worse, actually.
If we actually recognized that some people live as parasites, we’d be more able to help them mend their ways and become better people.
Jesus Christ tells his followers to be as wise as serpents and as harmless as doves; they are to love the sinner by correcting him and working to destroy sin. You, however, are far less wise than a jackass, let alone a serpent. One of the reasons Christ’s followers often fail to be wise is because people like you want society to delude itself and pretend that there are no bad people to be corrected.
Folkstyle, however, is a better sport than free or Greco.
You’re a jackass.
The libertarian whining was inevitable in this particular comm box.
If you think America doesn’t have disproportionately large numbers of parasites, then you’re an idiot.
What does South Korea's health care system quality have anything to do with North Korea's weird dynastic socialism?
Despite all the propaganda about the horrors of socialism in North Korea, for example, South Korea offers its citizens universal health care, and it seems to deliver the care competently.
While I agree that our healthcare system needs to improve in many ways (though the main problem isn't so much healthcare as the health insurance system), you should note a couple things on this subject. Let's start with the obvious:
We really should stop gloating about America’s superior competency and try to learn from other nations
Thanks.
This is a jagoff comment.
You are correct; Forney’s “main point” was not well-considered.
Young Belarusians (and Ukrainians, and Eastern Europeans in general) favor the West over Russia because the West is cool and Russia is not cool. The West is the land of “freedom” as young people define it: partying, drugs, sex.
I had a Ukrainian describe Euromaidan to me in this fashion (paraphrasing): “the West was offering nightclubs and dancing. Russia offered supply lines and trucks.” No young person ever got hot and bothered over supply lines.
It’s a classic imperial maneuver: the side that offers people the chance to engage in hedonism always wins. The British used opium, the U.S. uses gay sex. Nobody in history has managed to figure out a way to counter this. Russia and China can resist within their own borders but they can’t export their models to other countries; I suppose China could try by assisting other countries in setting up social credit systems, but social credit is so innately tied to the Chinese mentality that its usefulness in other cultures is limited (have fun implementing social credit in Latin America, a region known for being ungovernable).
lol, sure, because most heterosexual men dream of being anally penetrated by other men, really powerful argument for Western superiority.Replies: @Tor597
The British used opium, the U.S. uses gay sex.
In Russia, and I assume Belarus - there is at least as much freedom of youth, drugs (except cannabis), social life and sex, as in Western Europe. Also nobody looks at Western Europe for more sex or girlfriends (and in terms of drugs, it is just cannabis which you would idealize from some Western countries), but for a lower political corruption, better job opportunities, higher salaries, and better urban planning, infrastructure and health services. Surrounded by students in Western Europe, my culture shock has been that they seem surprisingly quiet and boring for people of this age. Students seem like they are mostly studying in the evenings, and even in warm weather streets can be very quiet already at 9-10pm. Women of that age also dress less sexually. Western youth are mostly "pacified" and not very wild - the only noisy protests are related to climate change. One of the problems with the current youth generation in West (and quite soon in Russia), is that they are more insulated from real life than any people in world history, so that they now need "safe spaces" even at the elite university, so no-one offends. Youth in the West live in hyper-luxury conditions by international standards; and what is quite unique in history, that they can dress in pink and rainbows, argue about being misgendered, and no-one beats them up.
land of “freedom” as young people define it: partying, drugs, sex.
the side that offers people the chance to engage in hedonism always wins. The British used opium, the U.S. uses gay sex.Not more than 1-2% of the population are interested in gay sex, and people perceive Western Europe as a place of tolerance and liberalism (and gay religion) - but America is not perceived this way. The perception of America and Western Europe is quite different. -The problem for youth with Russia (Belarus/Ukraine, etc) compared to the West (North West Europe) is what happens after university. Until the end of university, it's not much worse at all to live in Russia (Belarus/Ukraine) aside from some potential conscription issues - especially for Ukrainians -, and better in some ways.
Right, pal, that's why the US military and CIA have had to be deployed in seemingly limitless countries to destroy budding nationalist/trad movements for decades now.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPKsDE4FfTg
Nobody in history has managed to figure out a way to counter this.
Are there not clubs and dancing as good as or better in Moscow-SPB?Replies: @Philip Owen
I had a Ukrainian describe Euromaidan to me in this fashion (paraphrasing): “the West was offering nightclubs and dancing. Russia offered supply lines and trucks.” No young person ever got hot and bothered over supply lines.
I hope you tell those East Europeans that this is not true - and you know it. There's far more of that in poorer countries than in the West. Anyway, if people want sex and parties there's nothing stopping them but themselves - and it could even improve their TFR. What they have in the West is simply WORK, or they used to have it, but that's getting harder to find too, so some just settle for the social security benefits.
The West is the land of “freedom” as young people define it: partying, drugs, sex.
Nobody in history has managed to figure out a way to counter this.
Right, pal, that’s why the US military and CIA have had to be deployed in seemingly limitless countries to destroy budding nationalist/trad movements for decades now.
It will be impossible for this to top the movie, since the movie had LEVON HELM, but it looks promising.
Remember, Joe, who was born in 1942, is not a Baby Boomer.
Not a Catholic either.
Sleeping up the ladder is bad, so vote instead for … Donald Trump.
Yeah, pretty sure no one will care.
It’s pretty much her election to lose, and she can still lose it if she embraces crazy woke stuff. But being a former prosecutor, with a lot of non-Black blood, and married to a Jewish man, she has the opportunity to convince suburban women she won’t be pursuing the agenda to put black interests first.
I wonder if Steve will poast a lot about it. Everyone’s schoolmarm told them that if they don’t have anything nice to say, they shouldn’t say anything at all, and Steve’s really taken that to heart with regards to POTUS. But if he talks incessantly about one ticket, people might start to ask his opinion about the other one.
My impression here on this webzine, regarding both Steve and Ron, is that they position themselves (and probably internalize it) as smart guys who know Donald Trump is a big, orange joke of a man.They have never given him any explicit support, as far as I can tell, whereas a joker like me has gone as far as to copy and paste Trump's campaign website with my handle as if it were my own site and I had something to do with it. (I did that for a while here in 2016, while the "smart guys" pooh-pooh-ed Trump. I was willing to look stupid, whereas they were not.Look, I know, and any semi-conscious being knows, that The Donald is a joke, but he is OUR JOKE. You know the line: "They're bastards, but they're OUR bastards." What other choice do we have at this point?Regarding this being "her election to lose," as you say, I'm not so sure. My wife keeps telling me Trump will win and the polls and news are all deceptive or stupid or inaccurate for any number of reasons, and she is very smart and sensible, and she called the last one in which Trump won and the polls showed him behind. Most normal people don't even answer polls. Marketing surveys these days (sorry Steve) are the domain of the lumpenproletariat, and few others participate in them. We don't answer the phone, and we don't need or care whatever you are offering in exchange for our participation.So, "at the end of the day" [yuck] "bottom line" [yuck] we will see what happens...Replies: @Alexander Turok
Everyone’s schoolmarm told them that if they don’t have anything nice to say, they shouldn’t say anything at all, and Steve’s really taken that to heart with regards to POTUS.
Thanks for your opinion, worst commenter on Unz.com.
Bastrakov announces his opening while not wearing a mask; he would be destroyed by the conformity police here in pozzed America.
Don’t know the Russian etymology of Bastrakov, but it’s a strong-sounding name.
Agree.
Trump’s first moment of greatness was attacking W. Nobody should forget that even in 2015, that was extremely taboo in the GOP establishment.
I don’t think anyone else but Trump could have won the general in 2016, because the rest had voluntarily smeared themselves in W’s putridness.
Jeb raised and banked $110 million a year before the primary started, and was carefully following W’s 2000 primary playbook. It could have worked.
Trump literally saved America from the complete disaster of Hillary narrowly beating Jeb in 2016, one in which Scalia is replaced by a 5th leftist vote and 11 million illegals get an amnesty, the vote, and a wave of chain migration that puts 1986 to shame.
I'm not having this, on a couple of levels. I'm sure POTUS Hillary could have replaced Justice Scalia, but I very much doubt if she could have gotten amnesty, and in fact she might not have tried that hard for it.
Trump literally saved America from the complete disaster of Hillary narrowly beating Jeb in 2016, one in which Scalia is replaced by a 5th leftist vote and 11 million illegals get an amnesty, the vote, and a wave of chain migration that puts 1986 to shame.
Then he went and hired Mattis, Abrams, Bolton, Pompeo, and any number of other people who either served in the Bush II administration or would have been right at home there.Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
Trump’s first moment of greatness was attacking W. Nobody should forget that even in 2015, that was extremely taboo in the GOP establishment.
“George W. Bush Still Working on His Grand Strategy of Invade the World / Invite the World”
Yet another false premise, Mr. Sailer. Meanwhile, other, more important news is conveniently escaping your alleged pattern recognition capabilities.
From someone you know…Motor Sich’s technology is *specifically* technology the U.S. government says it doesn’t want Russia or China to have. But Prince’s Chinese-backed company was fine, to Trump. Now he says he’s blocking TikTok to protect U.S. national security from China. No—it doesn’t add up.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/security-contractor-erik-prince-is-in-talks-to-acquire-ukraines-motor-sich-11572949809
Oh, good, you’re here.
Perhaps more importantly, we must ask, when will he urge his social friends to release Geronimo’s skull to the Apache?
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29265600/ns/us_news-life/t/geronimos-kin-sue-skull-bones
Since a vaccine is largely illusory, the only real exit strategy is herd immunity (or the fact the all epidemics just peter out eventually even if no one is really knows why). Therefore, ideally we want high case rates but with low death rates: most everyone gets infected, recovers, is inoculated and we move on. Astonishingly, in spite of the incompetence and rancor at every level, this seems to be more or less happening. We now have a lot of cases, but relatively few deaths. Of course, the case counts are extremely artifacted by various testing regimes, so the case numbers are absurdly unreliable. But still, at a minimum we can say that there does seem to be more of it around than before.
And also of course, we probably could have gotten about the same result without multi-trillion dollar, riot-spawning, famine–inducing, nation-shaking lockdowns. As even the pro-authoritarian NYT‘s figures show, all of the mainstream first-world northern hemisphere countries had approximately the same experience, irrespective of lockdown policy: excess deaths peaked by April, emergency over by June. What are any of them still doing in lockdown? Good question. Apparently their authorities just like it that way. If the authorities were actually using science rather than politics to decide policy, they would not be locking down during warmer months, and probably not be locking down at all. Social distance, masks, whatever: sure. Mass house arrest: insanity … or malign conspiracy.
"If the authorities were actually using science rather than politics to decide policy..."
County and state leaders are beginning to crack down on gatherings at restaurants, as officials express frustration that many young people aren’t complying with social distancing recommendations and mask requirements — especially when alcohol is involved.
I'm just like an NBA star. Sometimes I throw the ball through the hoop, sometimes I miss.Replies: @gabriel alberton
all of the mainstream first-world northern hemisphere countries had approximately the same experience, irrespective of lockdown policy: excess deaths peaked by April, emergency over by June
"If the authorities were actually using science rather than politics to decide policy..."
County and state leaders are beginning to crack down on gatherings at restaurants, as officials express frustration that many young people aren’t complying with social distancing recommendations and mask requirements — especially when alcohol is involved.
Learn how to use the comment form here properly!
It isn’t hard.
Steve, our host, is a boomer and even he knows how to use blockquotes! (just kidding, love you, Steve)
It is becoming increasingly obvious that if one has to choose between Globohomo in the West and the Kakistocracy ruling Russia for the benefit of organized crime and Chechens, the only logical choice is to choose neither and instead work to reform the Rzeczpospolita under Polish leadership. Putting Poland, Belarus, Ukraine and Lithuania back together would create a white Christian nation with a population of over 90 million, larger than Germany, and probably more white Europeans than live in the Russian Federation. It would instantly be a powerful force in the world for Christian European values in a way that no Western country is willing to be and Russian never can be.
The obvious hitch in the plan is that Poles don’t seem very interested, but if PiS really wants a future for an independent Poland, they need to start thinking big.
LOL.
I disagree about Slavs not being susceptible to propaganda. ALL people are susceptible to propaganda.
Truly.
A week or two of living under an average American Democrat governor/tyrant would hopefully be all Karlin needs to purify his mind of the absurd claim that there is not a mass psychosis surrounding the corona virus. Either that or he would double down in the hysterical beliefs of the hypocrites who claim to be protectors of human life while they abort millions and permit support Marxist revolutionary terrorist marches that spread the virus more thoroughly than the churches or barber shops they lock down.
Lukashenko, clearly not a genius, reminds me of the enlightened mind memes, where often the brainless peon has the smartest take.
Folks/Steve
I have an acquaintance who makes several claims
1) Blacks were ruined by Democrat welfare schemes. Before that, in the late 1800s for example, they were “no worse” than southern Italians and Scandinavians, and “better” than the Irish. They were “improving.”
2) The Irish have added no more to white civilization than the blacks.
In effect, he minimizes black problems while making the Irish into “the real blacks.” I find this utterly ridiculous, for the simple reason that the Irish long ago assimilated into the norms of the older American majority, whereas blacks do not appear to be capable of such assimilation if for no other reason than the massive and obvious racial differences.
However, anyone know where to find statistical data to disprove this (on the surface) obvious nonsense with powerful authority? I’m especially interested in finding honest analyses of black crime over the centuries, before the government started specifically collecting and categorizing it (roughly the late 1950s).
Science does not matter. If science mattered, then that idiot Fauci wouldn’t have been telling us to not wear masks in spring. No, the whole mask mandate is just so goodwhites (and boomers) can take mask selfies, which are the most virgin, low-energy meme possible and thus perfect for goodwhite (and boomer) psychology.
Also, I guess this will be memory-holed:
After joining EU there was a lot of volatility for a few years, many Africans ended up in Prague almost accidentally. Then they had to deal with the local bureaucracy, language and residence policies, and most left or were forced to leave.But in the long run the big cities in Eastern Europe are at a high risk of being swamped by Third World migrants. The population in the capitols tends to be mindlessly liberal, and the re-migration of Africans and others from Western Europe is hard to control. The real issue are the African French or Pakistani Brits who think that now they are 'French' or 'British', but nobody in Eastern Europe sees them that way. It will get ugly.Replies: @Thulean Friend
...in Czechia there are noticeably fewer Africans today in Prague than there were in 2010.
Why would an African French person want to live in a poor shithole like Slovakia? The domestic full spectrum benefits available is on par, if not higher, than your average wage. Plus France has better food, better weather and there is a large diaspora support network.
You’re overselling your attraction. Maybe from FOB types it would be different, as they compare their native countries to a poor also-ran like yours, but not for the diaspora already living in wealthy countries. And no, GDPpc in PPP for Bratislava doesn’t tell you anything. Nominal wages do.
That’s my guess as well.
As an aside, notice how singularly unhelpful Wikipedia can be. I looked up one of the departments with a higher fertility rate, Haute-Saône, and found that Wikipedia gives absolutely no racial or ethnic info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haute-Sa%C3%B4ne#Demographics
Not that it would take much effort to find French government data elsewhere, of course.
Oh?
Not that it would take much effort to find French government data elsewhere, of course.
OT, but….
Anyone know where to find American crime rates, by race, from before the 1960s?
Someone is claiming that the Irish were “objectively worse” than the blacks before, he says, the black got “ruined” by the welfare state. He also claims that they were “no worse” than immigrants from southern Italy (Well, the Black Hand extortion rackets did get pretty bad) and Scandinavia (!). This is a thoroughly gay claim on the face of it, but I need stats.
(I reckon it would be statistically hard to separate the Irish, Italians, and Scandinavians from each other.)
A Pacific Northwest Bigfoot would eat an awful lot of venison, salmon, and wild fruit.
Venison - apes/hominoids lack any kind of claws or flesh tearing incisors, and is obviously why most apes around the world are mostly vegetarians.
A Pacific Northwest Bigfoot would eat an awful lot of venison, salmon, and wild fruit.
That's a serious error bar and definitely not a genocide, but surely "ultrakill". Also based on British Imperial sources post-WWI who knows what really happened.Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
Between 24,000 and 100,000 Hereros, 10,000 Nama and an unknown number of San died in the genocide.
LOL. All British Imperial atrocity claims during and after WW1 are complete lies.
This is all Covid-19 fault. Covid-19 was the straw that broke the camel’s back. The denial that the alt-right was chiefly composed of idiots and morons was no longer sustainable. Ron Unz had to face reality at last that with that low quality human materiel one cannot go to wars or revolutions.
Come. As far as I know, you think me neither an idiot nor a moron. Even if you do, there is no commenter at The Unz Review of whom I have a higher opinion than of you.Yet I am Alt-Right.I do not wear the Alt-Right armband on my sleeve, as it were, during daily life, but if asked, Alt-Right I am.My fellow Alt-Rightists are often young (and I do not think that many of them are in this thread) but, in my experience, are the very opposite of idiots and morons. Rightly or wrongly, they feel that they have been cheated of the national inheritance their grandparents received; and they feel that they have been systematically lied to about this. Therefore, they try to draw some conclusions and they probe to discover at which points they can push back.Even if you disapproved of me, you might cut the Alt-Right some slack. The young men of the Alt-Right would benefit from the sound insight of a wise man like you but will they listen after you have dismissed them as idiots and morons?I do not think that you should.Replies: @Parsnipitous
... the alt-right was chiefly composed of idiots and morons ...
I don’t feel any mutual national identity with the loud thoughtless whites of a southern european background.
Don’t knock it until you give it a fair trial, Bro.
Huh? Do you mean over a decade ago when he expressed the same views?? 🤔
Well it took some time but Unz has shown his true face
Like the other white enemies he is sensing the weakness and thinks it is the time
to stick the dagger in the back of whitey
E. Michael Jones is not at all anti-nationalist, per se. I actually don’t agree with his total rejection of “white nationalism,” but he is right that a secular white nationalism is doomed to fail. Also, he would be unlikely agree with Ron Unz’s claims here. (They have also held very different opinions about the corona virus lockdowns … in fact, Jones is on the totally opposite side of that one)
Are you named for the general or the thoroughly underrated country singer?

It will be necessary to assess this at the end of the year, but so far the available statistics make us doubt the" naturalness " of these deaths
Furthermore, given how many of the dead in Sweden are people in terminal care homes where admitted people have one month of expected life left, these are essentially natural deaths.
As far as I know in Finland and Norway, the death rate remained within the normal range, but in Sweden it almost doubled.Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
Also the number of deaths comparison will have to include people who died due to the lockdowns to be at all fair. For example, in Finland ...
As far as I know in Finland and Norway, the death rate remained within the normal range, but in Sweden it almost doubled.
This is all you need to know.
Officially, Sweden lost 0.0513% its population to corona virus. Officially, Great Britain lost 0.0688% of its population to corona virus.
So, let’s review: the country that immolated its future to stop the corona virus lost more people than the country that did not do a gay and idiotic “lockdown.”
And countries where people conscientiously wore masks and centralized quarantine carried on with no excess deaths or significant long-term restrictions on life whatsoever.
So, let’s review: the country that immolated its future to stop the corona virus lost more people than the country that did not do a gay and idiotic “lockdown.”
I was Lol at the sarcasm, but actually now I think you’re serious?Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
. I genuinely want you to bring us Bigfoot content.
Yes, I am serious.


When he has finished laughing, can you ask him to provide some rational refutation, or at least try. My main purpose here is debate. I'm not addressing primary school children who report to their master, but educated adults who are open to intellectual challenge and can engage in constructive debate. I'm willing to be convinced I'm wrong. So where am I wrong?Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
I’ve sent this guy’s articles to a Latin scholar, and he laughed out loud at the volume of his errors.
In a nutshell: Your understanding of Latin is subpar and it’s as if you’ve never heard of Mommsen.
The author has given a plethora of specifics. Have you given any?It seems to me that your nutshell is empty.
In a nutshell: Your understanding of Latin is subpar and it’s as if you’ve never heard of Mommsen.
What day was that? No sarcasm .. I genuinely don’t know what you mean.
It’s John Lewis, not John Louis, in the title. Probably a honest goof by your editor. Or something.
“And here is the only photo of John Lewis you should use:”
That’s Joe Louis. Again, another simple mistake. I get it, good help is hard to find in your neck of the woods. But the reality is that there are many photos we should use to celebrate Lewis’ noteworthy accomplishments.
https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2020/02/21/john-lewis-birthday-congressman-nashville-civil-rights-leader-turns-80/4834146002/
“And even for you, Sailer, this is weak.”
Of course it is. It’s Sunday night, John Lewis died a couple of days ago, and he now gets around to (dis)honoring a man who did far more for humanity than our intrepid host could (I Have A) Dream about.
The thing is this feud and the viciousness it still raises were news to me. So far I’ve only ever seen the Orthodox side apologists, but I expect the other side to be no less vicious.
No, we’re mostly just baffled by the appalling quality of his work.
I’ve sent this guy’s articles to a Latin scholar, and he laughed out loud at the volume of his errors.
When he has finished laughing, can you ask him to provide some rational refutation, or at least try. My main purpose here is debate. I'm not addressing primary school children who report to their master, but educated adults who are open to intellectual challenge and can engage in constructive debate. I'm willing to be convinced I'm wrong. So where am I wrong?Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
I’ve sent this guy’s articles to a Latin scholar, and he laughed out loud at the volume of his errors.
Well, in all fairness, the author does seem to have read and referenced quite a lot of lengthy books to support his lunatic hypothesis.
In all seriousness, if you’re going to publish people like this...
How do you define “Flu Hoaxery”?
I don’t read columnists who argue that the whole thing is a hoax. There is a difference between that, and criticizing the response.
In any case, that’s a deflection …. I genuinely want you to bring us Bigfoot content. That’s the real point.
I was Lol at the sarcasm, but actually now I think you’re serious?Replies: @John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan
. I genuinely want you to bring us Bigfoot content.
It is. All of Sweden's neighbors have imitated it. Norwegian leaders have apologized for overreacting in panic, ours have to be silent because they're about to hand over billions in corona bailouts to southern EU states but we're still imitating Sweden.
Based on Mike Whitney, shouldn’t Sweden be the coronavirus soft power superpower right now?
What???
Or the US? Since it also seemed to have followed Sweden’s strategy,
US: the media and Democrat state politicians are STILL pushing hysteria over this meme flu, schools will remain closed in many states, the leftist half of the country is still defending absurd lockdown policies, there are still mandatory mask policies and other hysterical overreactions all over the country
overreactions???