The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Hua Bin Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir ISteve Community James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Al X Griz Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred De Zayas Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Bailey Schwab Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Britannicus Brittany Smith Brooke C.D. Corax C.J. Miller Caitlin Johnstone Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar ChatGPT Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Harvin Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Courtney Alabama Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Skrbina David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Don Wassall Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens E. Geist Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Douglas Stephenson F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Key Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Ganainm Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gavin Newsom Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgia Hayduke Georgianne Nienaber Gerhard Grasruck Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Godfree Roberts Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Garros Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano H.G. Reza Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugh Perry Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras James W. Smith Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Janko Vukic Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jeremy Kuzmarov Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Mamer Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Atwill Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel Davis Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonas E. Alexis Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jorge Besada Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Correro Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth A. Carlson Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin DeAnna Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marc Sills Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Marcy Winograd Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Battaglioli Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Neville Hodgkinson Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Haenseler Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani R, Weiler Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Raymond Wolters Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Faussette Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Rob Crease Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Rose Pinochet RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Seaghan Breathnach Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Starr Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sybil Fares Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Wyatt Reed Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Austin Metcalf Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betar US Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Canary Mission Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Kushner Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlie Kirk Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colombia Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story Covert Action COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Crypto Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Cole David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Deportation Abyss Deportations Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Easter Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Enoch Powell Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve FEMA Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franklin Scandal Franz Boas Fraud Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom Freemasons French French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Flotilla GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Hell Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Huddled Masses Huey Newton Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Inbreeding Income Income Tax India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA Javier Milei JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Paul Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Miller Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Karmelo Anthony Kash Patel Kashmir Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry Ellison Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Maria Corina Machado Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Immigration Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monopoly Monotheism Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natanz Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Deal New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New Testament New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz Noam Chomsky Nobel Peace Prize Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition Nvidia NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise OFAC Oil Oil Industry OJ Simpson Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palantir Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Craig Roberts Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Petro Poroshenko Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Postindustrialism Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qasem Soleimani Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quiet Skies R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race-Ism Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rare Earths Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Red Sea Refugee Crisis Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romans Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds Roy Cohn RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satan Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Bessent Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Steven Witkoff Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tariffs Tatars Taxation Taxes Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Congress US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US State Department USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Civilization Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Race White Racialism White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Whitney Webb Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zohran Mamdani Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
jb
Comments
• My
Comments
1,414 Comments • 142,500 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    From iSteve commenter jb: ... how I think liberal affirmative action supporters actually justify AA in their own heads (as opposed to the lazy “it must be because they hate white people” thinking I see so often in forums like this): ... 1. We know that blacks are intrinsically just as smart as other races....
  • jb says:
    @Brutusale
    @jb

    I said nothing about your content and everything about your delivery. You sound just like some of the graying Ponytailiban that live near me.

    It's all about one thing for college-passed-through liberals (I refuse to use "educated"): getting enough foreigners over the border in time for the 2030 Census.

    Don't pretend to lecture me about what liberals think, Sparky. I live in Boston.

    I'll just ask one question: is affirmative action good for white people?

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @jb

    Ah, I see. You were complaining that in the course of trying to describe how liberals think I used the sort of language liberals might use. OK, sure, guilty as charged I guess.

    I’ll just ask one question: is affirmative action good for white people?

    Huh? Of course not! I don’t understand why you are even asking that.

    (Also, I am pretty sure there are at least a few people who live in Boston but nevertheless do not understand how liberals think).

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @jb

    So far, you're the only one here showing no understanding of how liberals think.

    Replies: @jb

  • From the New York Times news section: My impression is that the term "racial reckoning" has largely been dropped from hard news sections of newspapers (e.g., political news) after the Biden Administration figured out sometime in mid-2022 that the George Floyd craze was a vote loser and put out the word to the MSM to...
  • jb says:
    @IHTG

    “Oppenheimer” still easily met the diversity requirements for Best Picture.
     
    How? You ought to have quoted that part.

    Replies: @40 Lashes Less One, @Currahee, @Anon, @jb

    “Oppenheimer” still easily met the diversity requirements for Best Picture.

    It cleared one standard for offscreen hiring because nearly a dozen women held senior positions on the crew, including costume designer, set designer, editor and head hairstylist. At least one senior role was filled by someone from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group: the head of makeup, Luisa Abel, who is Hispanic.

    Even without those hiring decisions, “Oppenheimer” would have qualified. That is because its studio, Universal, has created in-house programs, in-career training and audience development that help satisfy the rules for almost every picture it makes.

    Since 2021, Universal has operated an extensive crew training program for underrepresented individuals. The majority of Universal movies participate, and “Oppenheimer” was no exception.

    Universal, more so than some other studios, also has a diverse marketing and distribution team, including Dwight Caines, the studio’s president of domestic marketing, who is Black. (All of his counterparts at other major studios are white.)

  • From iSteve commenter jb: ... how I think liberal affirmative action supporters actually justify AA in their own heads (as opposed to the lazy “it must be because they hate white people” thinking I see so often in forums like this): ... 1. We know that blacks are intrinsically just as smart as other races....
  • jb says:
    @Frau Katze
    @Shale boi

    I’ll add one more thing about Ross Douthat.

    After deciding to move to rural New England, he caught Lyme Diease (carried by ticks that are very common there). In most people, Lyme is readily cleared up with antibiotics but did not work for him.

    It took years to find a treatment that helped. The family decided to abandon their rural retreat (at considerable loss) and move back to town.

    He wrote a book about it, “The Deep Places.”

    Replies: @Poirot, @jb

    And one more thing. Ross often ends his his weekly subscriber-only (i.e., online only) newsletter with links to content considerably more based than anything he writes himself. For example, at the end of a meditation on Dune and decadence, he links to:

    Wokeness is actually two things

    Put simply, the people who are into woke ideas about gender and race are not the same as the people who are into woke ideas just about race, even if their political aims sometimes overlap. And these two groups have wildly different migration and fertility patterns. Gender wokeness is on the way out because the people who are attracted to gender wokeness are on the way out, given that their birth rates are so far below replacement. Meanwhile, race wokeness (of a kind) is on the rise because of the large and rapid demographic changes currently taking place in the West.

    Ross is the only writer I’m aware of at a major American newpaper who has a real interest in demographics and insightful things to say about it.

  • jb says:
    @Brutusale
    @jb

    Man, that is the perfect exposition of the mealy-mouthed jargon of the feminized left. You sound like a preschool teacher speaking to a recalcitrant 5-year-old!

    Replies: @jb

    What part of what I said do you think is incorrect? Do you really believe that huge numbers of ordinary run-of-the-mill white liberals, in their own heads, are thinking “My goal is to marginalize whites in their own countries”? Really? Just saying that out loud should be enough to convince you that the idea is nonsense. As I said, the policies liberals support may have the consequence of marginalizing whites in their own countries, but that’s an unintended consequence, it isn’t something liberals themselves ever think about or care about. They just want to feel like they’re being good people. (As does everyone here I would hope, however illiberal your politics might be).

    • Replies: @Dry, Watching Paint
    @jb

    Run-of-the-mill White liberals are usually college grads. They are not stupid. They know the consequences of affirmative action, and they don't mind. They convince themselves that they are good people by believing that working class Whites are evil and deserve to be crushed. They think they are heroes, fighting Nazis.

    -Discard

    , @Brutusale
    @jb

    I said nothing about your content and everything about your delivery. You sound just like some of the graying Ponytailiban that live near me.

    It's all about one thing for college-passed-through liberals (I refuse to use "educated"): getting enough foreigners over the border in time for the 2030 Census.

    Don't pretend to lecture me about what liberals think, Sparky. I live in Boston.

    I'll just ask one question: is affirmative action good for white people?

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @jb

  • jb says:
    @res
    @jb


    Almost everybody argues in good faith.
     
    I would say "believes they argue in good faith" is more accurate.

    Some definitions of "good faith" to consider whether or not "almost everybody" achieves this. Also "bad faith" since this is not a strict dichotomy. There are levels.

    https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2020-07/Good_Faith-vs-Bad_Faith-Arguments_or_Discussions.pdf


    GOOD FAITH: A “Good Faith” argument or discussion is one in which both parties agree on the terms on which they engage, are honest and respectful of the other person's dignity, follow generally-accepted norms of social interaction, and genuinely want to hear what the other person thinks and has to say.
    ...
    BAD FAITH: A “Bad Faith” discussion is one in which one or both of the parties has a hidden, unrevealed agenda—often to dominate or coerce the other individual into compliance or acquiescence of some sort—or lacks basic respect for the rights, dignity, or autonomy of the other party. Disrespect for the other party may include dishonesty. A person engaged in bad faith does not accept the other person as s/he is, but demands that s/he change in order to satisfy his/her requirements or to accept his/her will.

     

    My experience arguing with liberals is "good faith" does not at all hold by that standard. And "bad faith" all too often does. An important aspect of this is whether an argument is originated by the liberal or is responsive to an opposed argument. Most people behave worse in the latter case. And a fatal flaw of liberals these days is most live in a bubble and are not used to being challenged on their views.

    Another version.
    https://www.grammarly.com/blog/bad-faith-good-faith/


    A bad faith argument boils down to whether the arguer genuinely believes the claim they’re making.
    ...
    A bad faith argument is a position that can be factually disproved, yet its proponent continues to adhere to it. If the individual knows they are being dishonest or unfair with their position, it’s a bad faith argument.
    ...
    A good faith argument is an argument that’s honest, fair, and genuinely considers the opponent’s perspective. An argument doesn’t have to be factual or even logical to be made in good faith—the arguer’s intent is what makes a good faith argument.
    ...
    A good faith argument is an honest position. When an individual is open to discussing their position and adapting it when presented with facts that disprove their original claim, the position is a good faith argument.
     
    Those definitions are less clear cut. I tend to believe the "believes it" aspect holds (which I think is most of your point). While the aspect relating to "factual" and willingness to prove/disprove does not.

    What do you think?

    Replies: @jb, @Harry Baldwin

    I was thinking more of the second definition: genuinely believing that the claim you are making is true. I should qualify this though, as people who have something to gain by lying often lie. E.g., the politician who makes promises he has no intention of fulfilling, or the corporate drone keeping his head down and unenthusiastically mouthing the proper words. But when people enthusiastically endorse ideas even when they don’t have to, I think they generally mean it. That doesn’t mean they actually understand their own thinking or that of their opponents, or that their arguments make sense, or that they know anything about bubbles or motivated reasoning, or that they are civil and “respectful of the other person’s dignity”, or any of that. It just means that in their own minds they believe that they are being honest, that the words that are coming out of their mouths are true. In this sense I think that most of the Woke argue in good faith. (Although now that I think about it, the percentage of insincerely woke status seekers in academia may not be trivial. Hard to know).

    • Replies: @res
    @jb

    Thanks for elaborating. In addition to what you describe I think there is a significant component of "holding two opposing thoughts in their head at the same time" (e.g. blacks commit the same amount of crime as whites, yet they observe black neighborhoods being hellholes and choose not to live there) and failing to resolve that cognitive dissonance except by getting mad at anyone who points it out. I would call that lying to oneself. And have trouble calling any of that "arguing in good faith."

    I think my “believes they argue in good faith” characterization is a good one. And helps contribute to why conversations with people like that go bad so quickly. When someone is convinced they are the "good guy" it is a serious assault to their self concept to point out maybe they are not.

  • jb says:
    @Travis
    My parents were liberals and they knew Blacks were less intelligent than Whites. They supported affirmative action for Blacks because they felt Blacks deserved some help because they had been mistreated for so long. They saw affirmative action as a form of reparations. Some liberals I knew felt affirmative action and welfare would help reduce the risks of more rioting and generally help the Blacks economically to reduce racial strife. My parents had a total of 8 siblings and were all born between 1940 - 1950, and they were all liberals, except one of my uncles. all my liberal family members believed Blacks were less intelligent than whites, but only one of them thought this was due to racism and slavery. The others accepted that Blacks were just not as smart as whites and would never catch up to whites, but they felt affirmative action was a good idea to help Blacks because without affirmative action it would be almost impossible for many to go to college or get a civil service job or become a police officer etc…

    My mother taught high school in Philadelphia during the 1979s and was well aware of the limitations of Blacks. Yet she still supports affirmative action for blacks because she feels sorry for blacks and thinks it helps some of them to escape the ghetto and live a middle class life.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @jb

    You know, now that I think about it, I do know someone like that. A Jewish friend I’ve know since grad school, who is kind of unusual for a liberal in that he is willing to talk about anything. He doesn’t come right out and say he thinks negros aren’t smart (and yes, he uses that word), but he knows I think that, and he has an almost prurient interest in black crime. He says he supports affirmative action because negros are such sad people (again, his words!), and he doesn’t see any threat to people like him. He has a very odd personality though, and I’ve always assumed he was anomalous, but maybe not!

  • jb says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    From iSteve commenter jb:
     
    No offense to jb, but this has always been the argument for Affirmative Action. If this needs explication, it makes me wonder what everyone else here thought they were arguing with. Singling this out for special attention in 2024 is lightyears behind the curve.

    Replies: @jb

    You are absolutely right of course, but as the comments here (and in many other forums) make clear, there are a lot of people on the “Dissident Right” who make unbelievably obtuse and counterproductive arguments like “liberals support affirmative action because they hate white people and want to see them genocided”. Those are the people I am arguing with. They are a boat anchor for the entire movement (such as it is).

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
    @jb

    Thanks. I appreciate your reply, and I agree with you about the movement.

  • @meh

    … how I think liberal affirmative action supporters actually justify AA in their own heads (as opposed to the lazy “it must be because they hate white people” thinking I see so often in forums like this): …
     
    It's not lazy to think that they hate White people if they are constantly telling you that they hate White people (or if they are White, that they hate "the wrong kind of White people"). Unless of course "lazy" is just some kind of weird euphemism for Ockham's Razor.

    They are encouraged to openly hate White people by the mass media and academia; the complicated circular reasoning used to justify Affirmative Action isn't the real reason for the policy, it is just the cope that people use to justify it, when pressed. But, increasingly open anti-White attitudes means that they often don't feel like they actually have to justify it that way anymore. "It's bad for Whites and that's good because Whites are bad" is increasingly the justification.

    Reasons 1-5 were the playbook back when the system was much less openly anti-White and needed liberal-sounding justifications to keep the Good Whites on team Liberal. But it was never the real reason for AA.

    The real reason for Affirmative Action was never to help Blacks. It was to reduce the number of Whites (more particularly, White males) in elite institutions so that they would not be able to compete with Jews. And it worked. Of course this makes the USA increasingly dysfunctional but that's a side effect that TPTB are willing to live with.

    Some people really, really, really want to pretend that liberals/leftists/progressives - whatever you want to call them - are just suffering from some kind of religious mania or ideological madness due to bad information or sloppy thinking, which a little bit of education and logic can correct, when in fact they are just saying and thinking whatever TPTB want them to say and think.

    They don't actually care if what they are saying and thinking is true or logical. Most people are motivated to believe what the powerful/influential believe and convince themselves that it makes sense somehow due to ideas and narratives that they copy from mass media and academia while pretending to be critical independent thinkers. They get physically uncomfortable at the mere thought of being out of step with the narratives that TPTB promote. This is true for conservatives as well, because conservatives are just liberals with a 10-20 year delay.

    It really is much simpler than you guys are making it out to be. No one is arguing in good faith. People say the Emperor is clothed because the Emperor and all the powerful people around him say so; and because there are actual costs for saying that the Emperor has no clothes. In the story the ruse collapses when a little boy tells the truth; but that is just a story. In reality the little boy would have been drugged with Ritalin, denied access to higher education, denied access to high status employment, and if necessary jailed for hate crimes.

    Replies: @jb

    The idea that your enemies don’t believe what they say they believe is crippling. Almost everybody argues in good faith.

    • Replies: @res
    @jb


    Almost everybody argues in good faith.
     
    I would say "believes they argue in good faith" is more accurate.

    Some definitions of "good faith" to consider whether or not "almost everybody" achieves this. Also "bad faith" since this is not a strict dichotomy. There are levels.

    https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2020-07/Good_Faith-vs-Bad_Faith-Arguments_or_Discussions.pdf


    GOOD FAITH: A “Good Faith” argument or discussion is one in which both parties agree on the terms on which they engage, are honest and respectful of the other person's dignity, follow generally-accepted norms of social interaction, and genuinely want to hear what the other person thinks and has to say.
    ...
    BAD FAITH: A “Bad Faith” discussion is one in which one or both of the parties has a hidden, unrevealed agenda—often to dominate or coerce the other individual into compliance or acquiescence of some sort—or lacks basic respect for the rights, dignity, or autonomy of the other party. Disrespect for the other party may include dishonesty. A person engaged in bad faith does not accept the other person as s/he is, but demands that s/he change in order to satisfy his/her requirements or to accept his/her will.

     

    My experience arguing with liberals is "good faith" does not at all hold by that standard. And "bad faith" all too often does. An important aspect of this is whether an argument is originated by the liberal or is responsive to an opposed argument. Most people behave worse in the latter case. And a fatal flaw of liberals these days is most live in a bubble and are not used to being challenged on their views.

    Another version.
    https://www.grammarly.com/blog/bad-faith-good-faith/


    A bad faith argument boils down to whether the arguer genuinely believes the claim they’re making.
    ...
    A bad faith argument is a position that can be factually disproved, yet its proponent continues to adhere to it. If the individual knows they are being dishonest or unfair with their position, it’s a bad faith argument.
    ...
    A good faith argument is an argument that’s honest, fair, and genuinely considers the opponent’s perspective. An argument doesn’t have to be factual or even logical to be made in good faith—the arguer’s intent is what makes a good faith argument.
    ...
    A good faith argument is an honest position. When an individual is open to discussing their position and adapting it when presented with facts that disprove their original claim, the position is a good faith argument.
     
    Those definitions are less clear cut. I tend to believe the "believes it" aspect holds (which I think is most of your point). While the aspect relating to "factual" and willingness to prove/disprove does not.

    What do you think?

    Replies: @jb, @Harry Baldwin

    , @Dry, Watching Paint
    @jb

    Believing liars is crippling. Recognizing lies is liberating. Can you really believe that all the economists and sociologists and all the other academics in the social sciences are unaware of their own dishonesty? If so, why would they silence dissenting views rather than suppress them?

    -Discard

    Replies: @Dry, Watching Paint, @res

  • jb says:
    @AnonDead
    The left views affirmative action as a type of reparations - I think it's that simple.

    Replies: @jb

    It isn’t that simple, but yes, it’s that too, and that probably should be on the list. If I’d know Steve was going to promote my comment to a blog post I’d have thought about it more carefully, and there would have been something about the liberal sense of inherited guilt, the sense that white people, collectively, have an obligation to make amends to black people, collectively, for sins that other white people committed against other black people in the past. This is why it can feel right to take money and opportunities from the white child of an impoverished single white immigrant mother, whose people never had anything to do with American slavery, and give them to the black child of a wealthy black immigrant doctor, whose people never suffered from American slavery. It’s because until the world is made right, all white people owe all black people. It’s all emotion though — I don’t think many liberals would own up to believing in collective inherited guilt.

  • jb says:
    @Mike Tre
    "… how I think liberal affirmative action supporters actually justify AA in their own heads (as opposed to the lazy “it must be because they hate white people” thinking I see so often in forums like this): …"

    You're right jb (and Sailer), there's no effort to marginalize whites in their own countries. I have seeeeeeeeen the light!

    Or maybe it's just lazy to assume that liberals are really just victims of their own pathological altruism they way so many people like you are on these forums.

    Replies: @jb

    Do you actually know any liberals Mike? (I’m talking about ordinary garden variety liberals here, as opposed to the hard core Woke). They do not hate white people, and they do not want to marginalize whites in their own countries. What they want show compassion and decency and humanity towards all who need it. This may have the effect of marginalizing whites in their own countries, but that isn’t something they think about or care about. It certainly isn’t something they see, in their own heads, as a goal. Just because something matters to you it doesn’t mean it matters to everyone; if you don’t understand that you have no hope of reaching those who are not already on your side. (If that’s something you care about, which, depressingly, I’m pretty sure you don’t).

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @jb

    LOL do you jb? what you just typed is how liberals like to see themselves, not how they are. I'm from Chicago Irish Catholic stock, the old man is the oldest of 12th, and including all 36 of my first cousins on that side I might be the one and only non liberal, at least in the sense you're referring to.

    The rest of your post is just altruistic, virtue signaling nonsense. Normal liberals love the idea of white men being replaced in all institutions. they see that as justice.

    "What they want show compassion and decency and humanity towards all who need it."

    This might be the biggest load of crap I've ever read here. All they want to do, is virtue signal on facebook, so they can compete with all of their other liberal friends to see who can make the biggest ass of themselves with their phony compassion. The extent of your compassion is how much you can talk about it. You nor any of your liberal friends would ever take any real action, like take a needy family into your home? Rich liberal white neighborhoods in Chicago are the most well policed in the city because all those compassionate and decent liberals want absolutely nothing to do with blacks or any other icky brown people. Not that I blame them. Why do you think Chicago has been displacing negroes from the liberal city to the more conservative suburbs for the last 35 years in Chicago? Hint: it isn't compassion and decency. Get real buddy.

    , @res
    @jb

    That reads as accurate to me. But some facets make things worse than I think you are indicating.

    1. Cradle to grave propaganda means they (usually) are convinced of their correctness and won't even listen to counterarguments.

    2. Evaluating issues like this on an emotional rather than rational basis causes them to be easily led by people who DO want to marginalize whites.

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    , @Brutusale
    @jb

    Man, that is the perfect exposition of the mealy-mouthed jargon of the feminized left. You sound like a preschool teacher speaking to a recalcitrant 5-year-old!

    Replies: @jb

  • jb says:
    @Shale boi
    Off topic, but (prodded by recent post) are we supposed to know who Ross Douthat is? Somehow I missed him, that he was a thing or what he was about. Still don't really understand...the Wiki article did not convey how the Sailerariat thinks of him.

    It's sort of like...I just saw the word "girlboss". Which I guess has been a thing for 10 years now. I was able to figure out what that sort of was.

    Just strange that I'm so tuned out of pop culture. Is that a feature? Does Steve enjoy following pop culture or is it like sort of he has to do it as his "job"?

    Replies: @ScarletNumber, @jb, @Almost Missouri, @Frau Katze

    The main thing about Ross Douthat is that he is one of the small number of nominally “conservative” opinion writers that the New York Times — the most influential newspaper among American elites — has historically employed in the name of “balance”. (To be fair, I don’t think the desire for ideological balance has been entirely insincere, although I don’t know how long we will continue to see it. The old timers at the Times seem to be somewhat flummoxed and intimidated by the hard core leftism of their woke junior staffers, who do not want balance). Beyond that Douthat is a believing conservative Catholic, and regularly writes on social issues from that point of view (although he spends far too much time focusing on the internal politics of the Catholic Church), which makes him an odd duck indeed. Beyond even that though, more than anyone else at the Times he sometimes edges towards forbidden territory. It’s suspected that he is an iSteve reader, although he certainly would never directly reference Steve, and that he knows more than he lets on. He’s very careful though, and appears to want very much to keep his high profile position at the Times, rather than going the way of Bari Weiss or James Bennet. It will be interesting to see if he can.

    • Replies: @Shale boi
    @jb

    Thanks, 'nominally “conservative” opinion writers' kind of explains him, I guess.

    I remember (but don't remember the names) the WaPo doing that a couple decades ago. They tended to be pretty milquetoast conservatives. And to either not last, or be liberals in wolves' clothing.

    , @SFG
    @jb

    David Brooks actually mentioned Steve by name, and his buddies went after him for it. So Douthat's a lot more circumspect. But I have noticed stuff discussed by Steve winds up in the MSM a few weeks later quite often.

  • From my new column in Taki's Magazine: Read the whole thing there.
  • jb says:
    @Tiny Duck
    white men are the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action this country has ever seen. That’s not rhetoric or metaphor. It's only truth. If affirmative action is defined as giving someone an extra boost based on race, it’s hard to see how anyone can argue the point. Slots for academic admission, for employment and promotion, for bank loans and for public office have routinely been set aside for white men. This has always been the nation’s custom. Until the 1960s, it was also the nation’s law.

    So if we want to talk about achievements being tainted by racial preference, it seems only logical to start there. After all, every worthwhile thing African Americans achieved prior to the mid-‘60s was done, not just without racial preference, but against a backdrop of open racial hostility.

    By contrast, nothing white men have ever achieved in this country was done without racial and gender preferences. Affirmative action.

    I know that will be hard for some folks to hear. I know it will leave some white brothers indignant. And I expect many recitations of “up by my bootstraps” and “know what it’s like to be poor.” We all want to feel that we made it on our own merits, and it’s not my intention to diminish the combination of pluck, luck, hard work and ability that typically distinguishes success, whether white, black or magenta.

    There’s a word for those who believe race is not a significant factor in white success: delusional.

    It is not coincidence, happenstance or evidence of their intellectual, physical or moral superiority that white guys dominate virtually every field of endeavor worth dominating. It is, rather, a sign that the proverbial playing field is not level and never has been.

    My correspondents feel they should not be asked to respect the skill or abilities of a black professional who may or may not have benefited from affirmative action. They think such a person should expect to be looked down upon. But black people have spent generations watching white men who were no more talented, and many times downright incompetent, vault to the head of the line based on racial preference.

    So, here's my question:

    Would African Americans be justified in looking down on white professionals? In wondering whether they are really smart enough to do the job? In questioning their competence before they had done a thing?

    Replies: @jb, @TWS, @TWS, @Patrick in SC

    Hard to hear because it’s not true. If slavery had never been established in America, if no African had ever set foot on its shores, America would still have ended up as a prosperous industrialized nation. If you don’t believe this, look at Canada, which until recently had few blacks. Or Australia, which had a whites-only policy, and which never got much work out of its native aborigines. White people have indeed oppressed blacks in the past, which is unfortunate, but white people have never needed black people around in order to be successful.

    Black people, OTOH, always sink to the bottom of the barrel, no matter where they are, inside of Africa or outside. They lose out to Europeans. They lose out to Arabs. They lose out to Asians. There is no country on Earth where blacks successfully compete against non-blacks without some form of affirmative action. Now that’s something that will be hard for some folks to hear!

  • jb says:

    I previously described how I think liberal affirmative action supporters actually justify AA in their own heads (as opposed to the lazy “it must be because they hate white people” thinking I see so often in forums like this). I’m going to repeat my comment here, with an additional point, 4a to clarify something I wasn’t clear on before:

    1. We know that blacks are intrinsically just as smart as other races. (This is revealed truth. It must be so. It would be just awful if it weren’t!).

    2. And yet blacks do poorly on all measures of cognitive ability. (The “achievement gap”).

    3. Therefore something must be holding them down. (The legacy of racism. Stereotype threat. Socioeconomic status. Lack of self esteem. Something!).

    4. The solution is affirmative action. If we can artificially place enough blacks in high positions that they do not appear qualified for but deep down really are (see point 1) then eventually they will reach a critical mass that allows them to overcome whatever is holding them down.

    4a. There is no downside to affirmative action! Because we know that blacks are just as smart as whites, it follows that whatever their test scores might seem to indicate, the highest scoring blacks are intrinsically just as capable as the highest scoring whites, and are therefore guaranteed to be every bit as competent when handed positions as doctors, lawyers, professors, scientists, air traffic controllers, etc. Any evidence that suggests otherwise (including the evidence of your own lying eyes) has to be wrong somehow.

    5. If it hasn’t worked yet that just means we haven’t been affirming hard enough. (We need to go back up the mountain again — this time Jesus will come for sure).

    • Replies: @Dry, Watching Paint
    @jb

    So how do liberal affirmative action supporters justify buying houses in expensive White neighborhoods instead of less expensive diverse neighborhoods? How do they justify sending their kids to private schools? They don't. They know that Blacks aren't very smart, are much more violent, and tend to destroy everything they touch, and they respond accordingly. "Revealed preference" is the name for it.

    Affirmative action is best explained by malice towards the White working class.

    -Discard

    Replies: @OilcanFloyd

    , @James N. Kennett
    @jb


    I previously described how I think liberal affirmative action supporters actually justify AA in their own heads
     
    I wonder what those liberal AA supporters think when they are on the operating table and discover that their surgeon is a diversity hire.
  • From the Daily Mail: Almost certainly, that's what most presidents of Harvard believed, at least back when they hired smart ones: getting rid of affirmative action/quotas/DEI would cut the black share of tenured Harvard professors by 80% or more. So that's why they don't do it. I like to joke that just as in the...
  • jb says:

    I’ve seen plenty of warnings in the media that the elimination of affirmative action would result in a sharp decrease in the percentage of blacks at elite universities, and this seems pretty close to an explicit acknowledgement that right now blacks don’t have what it takes to compete on even terms. It’s that “right now” that’s the key though. It’s important to try to understand what your opponents are actually thinking, rather than giving in to the temptation to put unflattering strawman arguments into their heads, so here’s what I think liberals are actually thinking on affirmative action:

    1. We know that blacks are intrinsically just as smart as other races. (This is revealed truth. It must be so. It would be just awful if it weren’t!).

    2. And yet blacks do poorly on all measures of cognitive ability. (The “achievement gap”).

    3. Therefore something must be holding them down. (The legacy of racism. Stereotype threat. Socioeconomic status. Lack of self esteem. Something!).

    4. The solution is affirmative action. If we can artificially place enough blacks in high positions that they do not appear qualified for but deep down really are (see point 1) then eventually they will reach a critical mass that allows them to overcome whatever is holding them down.

    5. If it hasn’t worked yet that just means we haven’t been affirming hard enough. (We need to go back up the mountain again — this time Jesus will come for sure).

  • jb says:

    OT, but I noticed that Ross Douthat’s most recent op-ed uses the term “anti-whiteness”, and I suddenly wondered how often that term had appeared in the New York Times. It turned out to be four times, all within the past seven years: three by Ross, who uses the term about the same way we would use it here, and once, dismissively, by Brent Staples, in a piece where he addresses the critically pressing issue of the treatment of blacks in pre-Civil Rights newspapers.

    Of course I had to Google “anti-blackness” next, but Google has stopped making it easy to count articles, and I’m not even going to try. But good for Ross: whatever else you might think of him, he is, however tentatively, going there.

    • Replies: @Stan Adams
    @jb

    I did a ProQuest search through the archives of the print edition (going back to 1980) and came up with 76 results.

    The first usage was in 1985; the second in 1990; and then the third, fourth, and fifth in 2015, during what Steve would call the Late Obama Age Collapse.

    Usage of the term exploded in June 2020, in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd.

    Here's the list:



    1
    JACKSON STRESSES BLACK-JEWISH TIES
    Gross, Jane.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 19 May 1985: A.15.
    ...anti-blackness,'' Mr. Jackson said, reviewing his trip in an interview here...

    2
    THE NEW TRIBALISM; Who'll Take The High Ground?: [Letter]
    New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 23 Sep 1990: A.4.
    ...anti-blackness, homophobia. We are lying to ourselves, and such lies fester -...

    3
    Clinton and Black Activist, Raw and Unscripted: [National Desk]
    Haberman, Maggie.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 20 Aug 2015: A.1.
    ...and minds" to address what he calls a virulent strain of "anti-blackness" that...

    4
    Hillary Clinton's Response to a Black Activist: [Letter]
    New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 26 Aug 2015: A.18.
    ...change 'hearts and minds' to address what he calls a virulent strain of 'anti...
    ...-blackness' " in this country. In general, she said, "I don't believe you change...

    5
    A Trailer, and a Fight, Over Stonewall: [Arts and Leisure Desk]
    Schou, Solvej.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 20 Sep 2015: AR.14.
    ...anti-blackness, Hollywood trans-face casting, misgendering, identity...

    6
    Girls Go Missing, and Washington's Racial Divide Grows Wider: [National Desk]
    Sheryl Gay Stolberg.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 02 Apr 2017: A.14.
    ...black and Latina girls. "The bottom line is there is an anti-blackness, an...

    7
    Where 'Everything Is Under Attack': [Education Life Supplement]
    Pappano, Laura.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 06 Aug 2017: ED.18.
    ...Independent "for its continual perpetuation of hate speech, anti-Blackness, and...

    8
    When a Racial Slur Feels Irrelevant: [Op-Ed]
    Thrasher, Steven W.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 19 Aug 2018: SR.11.
    ...his anti-blackness. Calling majority-black nations "shithole countries."...

    9
    It's On Men to End Sexism in the Black Church: [Op-Ed]
    Ware, Lawrence.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 02 Dec 2018: SR.5.
    ...white people that if they fail to speak up when confronted with anti-blackness,...

    10
    Novel Is Pulled After Readers Charge Racism: [Business/Financial Desk]
    Alter, Alexandra.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 01 Feb 2019: B.7.
    ...device. "How is nobody mentioning the anti-blackness and blatant bigotry in...

    11
    Donald Trump, Raging Racist: [Op-Ed]
    Blow, Charles M.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 15 July 2019: A.21.
    ...country, some degree of anti-blackness has existed. Now, there is an...

    12
    White Friends, Fight Anti-Blackness: [Op-Ed]
    Sanders, Chad.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 06 June 2020: A.21.
    ...need them to fight anti-blackness. My book is coming out...

    13
    'Pandemic Within a Pandemic' Fuels Unrest: [Correction]
    Sheryl Gay Stolberg.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 08 June 2020: A.20.
    ...and anti-blackness," citing the coronavirus and the recent killings of three...

    14
    Sarah Bellamy: [Arts and Leisure Desk]
    New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 14 June 2020: AR.4.
    ...equity, to fight white supremacy and anti-blackness." That would be tremendously...

    15
    I'm a Black American Refugee: [Op-Ed]
    Drayton, Tiffanie.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 14 June 2020: SR.4.
    ...in my childhood mind was ruined by anti-blackness as I grew older. The quest for...

    16
    Judges Grapple With Racial Injustice: [Op-Ed]
    Wegman, Jesse.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 18 June 2020: A.22.
    ...the heart of so much of the legal system's failure of justice. "Racism and anti...
    ...-blackness have always operated and continue to operate under color of law," L....

    17
    Note to Dancers: ‘Drop Your Self-Consciousness’ and Get Into It [With graphic(s)]
    Kourlas, Gia.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 19 June 2020.
    ...to anti-blackness in all of its forms, you say, wow. Again . But this time...

    18
    Sanders Wanted a Revolution. But Does This One Want Him?: [National Desk]
    Ember, Sydney.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 19 June 2020: A.14.
    ...and anti-blackness, and that stuff is even outdistancing what candidates in the...

    19
    Calling All Instruments of Change: [Arts and Leisure Desk]
    Kourlas, Gia.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 21 June 2020: AR.5.
    ...to murder, when you're accustomed to anti-blackness in all of its forms, you...

    20
    Trying to Be 'One of The Good Ones': [Op-Ed]
    Higgins, Maeve.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 21 June 2020: SR.2.
    ...white, understanding racism and anti-blackness is not a root canal, it's not...

    21
    The Second Defeat of Bernie Sanders: [Op-Ed]
    Douthat, Ross.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 25 June 2020: A.24.
    ...corporation worth its salt is saying something about structural racism and anti...
    ...-blackness, and that stuff is even outdistancing what candidates in the...

    22
    Johnson & Johnson And Unilever Retreat On Selling Lighter Skin: [Business/Financial Desk]
    Arora, Priya; Maheshwari, Sapna.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 26 June 2020: B.5.
    ...a grinning black woman, was based on a racial stereotype. In South Asia, anti...
    ...-blackness and colorism have origins that predate colonialism and systemically...

    23
    As U.S. Confronts Anti-Black Racism, Latinos Wonder Where They Fit In [With graphic(s)]
    Medina, Jennifer.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 03 July 2020.
    ...their platforms to dismantle racism, colorism and anti-blackness in our own...
    ...Mijente circulated a similar petition. Anti-Blackness has deep and complicated...
    ...in fights against anti-Blackness.” Many liberal Latino activists have been...



    24
    Latinos Seek Voice in Black-and-White Dialogue: [National Desk]
    Medina, Jennifer.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 04 July 2020: A.1.
    ...anti-blackness in our own Latino community." Mijente circulated a similar...
    ...and that we can be active conspirators in fights against anti-Blackness." ...
    ...-Blackness has deep and complicated roots throughout Latin America, where...

    25
    Do Progressives Have a Free Speech Problem?: [Op-Ed]
    Goldberg, Michelle.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 19 July 2020: SR.3.
    ...the 1960s and Richard Nixon's vote share. Shor was accused of "anti-Blackness"...

    26
    The Trouble With 'Anti-Racist' Movie Lists: [Op-Ed]
    Gates, Racquel.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 19 July 2020: SR.3.

    ...this long overdue rush to acknowledge America's deeply entrenched anti-blackness...

    27
    Let's Talk About 'Indian Matchmaking': [Op-Ed]
    Sathian, Sanjena.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 09 Aug 2020: SR.7.
    ...women dating outside the race. ("Masala" deserves praise for tackling anti...
    ...-Blackness among South Asians.) On "Master of None" and "The Mindy Project," the...

    28
    A Seasoned View on Today's Protests: [The Arts/Cultural Desk]
    Harper, Sydney.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 11 Aug 2020: A.2.
    ...very first time. These protests against anti-Blackness and police brutality,...

    29
    Every Choice for Parents Contains Potential Risks Or Unfair Advantages: [Foreign Desk]
    Claire Cain Miller.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 14 Aug 2020: A.7.
    ...about it all the time, in this moment of heightened awareness of racism and anti...
    ...-Blackness and Covid racial disparities," said Professor Carter, who studies...

    30
    Yale Students Denounce Discrimination Accusations: [National Desk]
    Anemona Hartocollis; Giulia Mcdonnell Nieto Del Rio.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 15 Aug 2020: A.17.
    ...anti-Black racism in America. "Anti-Blackness and systematic racism and...

    31
    Sometimes, a Song Sparks a Revolution: [Arts and Leisure Desk]
    Brooks, Daphne A.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 16 Aug 2020: AR.10.
    ...anti-Blackness of America's nascent record business in the early 20th century. ...

    32
    Guggenheim Approves Diversity Plan After Staff Complaints of Racism
    Small, Zachary.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 17 Aug 2020.
    ... “That means acknowledging the museum’s anti-Blackness and holding leadership...

    33
    Guggenheim Aims to Focus on Diversity: [The Arts/Cultural Desk]
    Small, Zachary.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 18 Aug 2020: C.3.
    ...from its foundation. That means acknowledging the museum's anti-Blackness and...

    34
    This Time, Happily-Ever-After Isn't Assured: [Movies, Performing Arts/Weekend Desk]
    De León, Concepción.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 04 Sep 2020: C.11.
    ...always anti-Blackness. There's always these kind of incredibly, so cruel that...

    35
    A Black Fan Group Speaks, and the N.H.L. Listens: [Sports Desk]
    Santaniello, Gary.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 18 Sep 2020: B.10.
    ...impacted personally by anti-Blackness or oppression won't change, because why...

    36
    Photoville, With a Wider Lens: [The Arts/Cultural Desk]
    Mitter, Siddhartha.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 22 Sep 2020: C.1.
    ...anti-Blackness as hostile terrain; to Black creation under extreme conditions;...

    37
    WeChat, Wild Rumors and All, Offers Chinese Immigrants a Lifeline: [National Desk]
    Hong, Nicole.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 05 Oct 2020: A.16.
    ...who said the Chinese community suffered from "rampant anti-Blackness" and urged...

    38
    Education Without Anxiety About Racism: [Op-Ed]
    Anderson, Melinda D.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 29 Oct 2020: A.29.
    ...schools as "sites for anti-Blackness." "I'm able to witness what school has...

    39
    Can Clubhouse Move Fast Without Breaking Things?: [Business/Financial Desk]
    Roose, Kevin.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 26 Feb 2021: B.1.
    ...tour. ("We unequivocally condemn Anti-Blackness, Anti-Semitism, and all other...

    40
    Move to Retire Dr. Seuss Books Stirs a Backlash: [National Desk]
    Alter, Alexandra; Harris, Elizabeth A.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 05 Mar 2021: A.1.
    ...in children's literature published "The Cat Is Out of the Bag: Orientalism, Anti...
    ...-Blackness, and White Supremacy in Dr. Seuss's Children's Books," a paper...

    41
    Black and Wary, I Got Vaccinated Anyway: [Op-Ed]
    Young, Damon.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 11 Apr 2021: SR.3.
    ...This mistrust comes from an awareness of the ubiquity of American anti-Blackness...
    ...the anti-Blackness embedded in society, participation is still necessary to...



    42
    ‘We Have No Right to Destroy Them’
    Williams, Andrea.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 14 Apr 2021.
    ...justification for his own anti-Blackness. Later, during a time of hope and...

    43
    The Fleecing of the Negro Leagues: [Sports Desk]
    Williams, Andrea.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 15 Apr 2021: B.7.
    ...own anti-Blackness. Later, during a time of hope and actual headway, his words...

    44
    A Monument of Past and Present: [The Arts/Cultural Desk]
    Cotter, Holland.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 05 June 2021: C.1.
    ..."How do we dismantle systems of anti-Blackness? How can we come together...
    ...final wall in the gallery called "Systems of Anti-Blackness in America" at...

    45
    Protest Moments They Will Never Forget: [National Desk]
    Shimabukuro, Mark.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 08 June 2021: A.17.
    ...movement as we grappled with anti-Blackness and racism in a way I had never seen...

    46
    Omar Comments Spur Democratic Infighting On Human Atrocities: [National Desk]
    Weisman, Jonathan.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 11 June 2021: A.14.
    ...detractors of Islamophobia and "anti-Blackness." The day's back-and-forth ended...
    ...anti-Blackness and Islamophobia." Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington,...

    47
    The Pain of Being Erased: [The Arts/Cultural Desk]
    Garcia, Maira; Garcia, Sandra E; Herrera, Isabelia; De León, Concepción; Phillips, Maya; et al.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 23 June 2021: C.1.
    ...(mostly) fair-skinned. It's a reflection of a global culture of anti-Blackness...
    ...history of anti-Blackness, which has permitted white and lighter-skinned Latinos...

    48
    In Brooklyn, New Statue of Floyd Is Defaced With Symbol of a White Supremacist Group: [National Desk]
    Watkins, Ali.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 26 June 2021: A.16.
    ...anti-Blackness and racism, but it is also about the lack of even basic human...

    49
    Christians Must Fight Systemic Racism: [Op-Ed]
    Esau Mccaulley.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 19 July 2021: A.18.
    ...weapon against anti-blackness and despair. Others have trod different paths. ...

    50
    The Spectacle of Latinx Colorism: [Op-Ed]
    Karla Cornejo Villavicencio.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 01 Aug 2021: SR.4.
    ...of anti-Blackness in our community. When interviewers have asked me what...
    ...not the first time they have brought many of us to tears. Anti-Blackness...

    51
    Traversing Inextricably Linked Worlds: [Review]
    D'Souza, Aruna.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 20 Aug 2021: C.1.
    ...to highlight the anti-Blackness embedded in our most revered art historical...

    52
    MacArthur Foundation Announces 2021 ‘Genius’ Grant Winners
    Stevens, Matt; Schuessler, Jennifer.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 28 Sep 2021.
    ...recovery from the pandemic and combat anti-Blackness, uplift Indigenous...

    53
    25 Are Named MacArthur Fellows: [The Arts/Cultural Desk]
    Stevens, Matt; Schuessler, Jennifer.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 29 Sep 2021: C.3.
    ...recovery from the pandemic and combat anti-Blackness, uplift Indigenous Peoples...

    54
    The Impact of the Browning of America on Anti-Blackness: [Op-Ed]
    Blow, Charles M.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 15 Nov 2021: A.16.
    ...-blackness. You have to fight both. The sad reality is, however, that...
    ...underscoring that you don't have to be white to contribute to anti-blackness. A...
    ...how anti-blackness, or anti-darkness, is no respecter of race or ethnicity. It...

    55
    Dominique Morisseau Pulls Play From L.A. Theater, Citing ‘Harm’
    Stevens, Matt.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 27 Nov 2021.
    ...industry to “look inward and acknowledge a pervasive culture of anti-blackness...

    56
    Carrie Mae Weems Sets the Stage and Urges Action
    Aruna D’Souza.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 06 Dec 2021.
    ...anti-Blackness and eroding democracy foremost among many woes, while reminding...

    57
    Images That Shout: Take Action: [Review]
    D'Souza, Aruna.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 07 Dec 2021: C.1.
    ...with ever-present anti-Blackness and eroding democracy foremost among many...

    58
    Shakespeare Stories 'Satisfy His Soul': [Arts and Leisure Desk]
    Collins-Hughes, Laura.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 06 Feb 2022: AR.8.
    ...centuries has often been portrayed in ugly caricature; and the anti-Blackness...
    ...and anti-Blackness. He speaks, too, about the buildup of daily indignities and...

    59
    An Expert Practitioner Administers the Pain: [Review]
    Soloski, Alexis.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 16 Feb 2022: C.6.
    ...who would deny Thompson any role he wanted?) But anti-Blackness and antisemitism...

    60
    U.S. Grants Temporary Protected Status to Some Ukrainians
    Sullivan, Eileen.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 03 Mar 2022.
    ...is evidence of anti-Blackness and discrimination toward Black immigrants,” Tse...

    61
    Biden Administration Gives Temporary Protected Status to Some Ukrainians in U.S.: [Foreign Desk]
    Sullivan, Eileen.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 04 Mar 2022: A.8.
    ...decisions. "It is evidence of anti-blackness and discrimination toward Black...

    62
    Demanding That Ketanji Brown Jackson 'Show Her Papers': [Op-Ed]
    Blow, Charles M.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 07 Mar 2022: A.16.
    ...isolated incident. People the world over carry so much anti-Blackness that Black...

    63
    After a Campus Uproar, Princeton Seeks to Fire A Tenured Professor: [National Desk]
    Anemona Hartocollis.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 21 May 2022: A.21.
    ..."Anti-Blackness is foundational to America." The letter called on the...

    64
    Deliverance Draped in Loss: [Arts and Leisure Desk]
    Phillips, Maya.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 26 June 2022: AR.6.
    ...Should we be praising Erika for her anti-Blackness, her privilege, her Uncle...

    65
    Solveig Gold Is Proud to Be the Wife of a ‘Canceled’ Princeton Professor
    Anemona Hartocollis.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 01 July 2022.
    ...that the university combat institutional racism. “Anti-Blackness is...

    66
    The Aspirations of Solveig Gold: [Style Desk]
    Anemona Hartocollis.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 03 July 2022: ST.6.
    ...demanding that the university combat institutional racism. "Anti-Blackness...

    67
    The Exploitative Anti-Blackness Of Kanye West: [Op-Ed]
    Blow, Charles M.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 10 Oct 2022: A.21.

    68
    Los Angeles City Council President Resigns in Light of Racist Comments: [Correction]
    Cowan, Jill; Hubler, Shawn.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 11 Oct 2022: A.15.
    ...exemplifies anti-Blackness," she said. "How is it we have these people in...

    69
    The Self-Destruction of Ye: [Op-Ed]
    Blow, Charles M.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 31 Oct 2022: A.19.
    ...should have existed for his anti-Blackness. This is not about mental illness....

    70
    'A Moment in History I'm Going to Remember Forever': Irving Is Reinstated: [Sports Desk]
    Sopan Deb.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 21 Nov 2022: D.7.
    ...legitimately to learn about what anti-Blackness was," Irving added. "And it led...

    71
    Blacks and Jews, Again: [Op-Ed]
    Dyson, Michael Eric.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 27 Nov 2022: SR.4.
    ...in on Ye's noxious anti-Blackness may have been discouraged from doing so...
    ...mother or brother, but you had better not. By that standard, Ye's anti-Blackness...

    72
    As Historians Gather, No Truce in the History Wars
    Schuessler, Jennifer.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 08 Jan 2023.
    ...stories, that aren’t rooted in histories of anti-Blackness,” she said,...

    73
    Grappling With Past, Present and Future: [The Arts/Cultural Desk]
    Schuessler, Jennifer.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 09 Jan 2023: C.1.
    ...anti-Blackness," she said, historians of Black people "have had to by default...

    74
    Judge America by the Number of Small Coffins It Tolerates: [Op-Ed]
    Esau Mccaulley.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 31 Mar 2023: A.20.
    ...politician." The deaths of the children spoke to the state of anti-Blackness...

    75
    A Show Confronts Evil, Yet the Friction Lingers: [The Arts/Cultural Desk]
    D'Souza, Aruna.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 20 July 2023: C.1.
    ...courageous way to take on the pernicious anti-Blackness he saw around him....

    76
    Old New York's Most Powerful Black Woman: [Op-Ed]
    Staples, Brent.  New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.. 18 Feb 2024: SR.6.
    ...to know Elizabeth would have warned her of how easily the city's anti-Blackness...

    , @Colin Wright
    @jb


    ...Of course I had to Google “anti-blackness” next, but Google has stopped making it easy to count articles, and I’m not even going to try. But good for Ross: whatever else you might think of him, he is, however tentatively, going there.
     
    But he doesn't go too far.

    That way, it's titillating rather than obscene.
  • In my current Taki's Magazine column on why "polyamory" appears to be emerging as the New Current Thing, I snarked: From Time magazine in 2023: The Surprising Political Evolution of American Polyamory BY CHRISTOPHER M. GLEASON / MADE BY HISTORY NOVEMBER 13, 2023 10:00 AM EST Polyamory seems to have burst upon the American mainstream...
  • Heinlein smuggles into Moon a lot of propaganda for polyamory via his narrator…

    I read a lot of science fiction when I was young, and as a typical straight teenage boy I found quite a lot to titillate me. (I very distinctly remember reading The Puppet Masters and getting a kick out of all the nakedness). At the time I assumed that the authors were simply exploring alternative sexual possibilities the same way they explored alternative technologies or alternative social structures or alternative histories and so on. That seemed to me the whole point of science fiction: exploring all the possible ways that things could be different. I gradually noticed though cases where authors would repeat the same distinctively odd scenarios in different stories, and I eventually came to realize that in many (most?) cases the authors were simply using the narrative freedom of science fiction to safely smuggle their own personal sexual fetishes into their their work.

    Also: Naked? With Strangers? In Europe, It’s How You Relax at the Spa.

  • Data scientist David Rozado presents his complete collection of Google Gemini 17th Century physicists. He thinks the one in the lower right corner might be reminiscent of a European physicist like Galileo, who looked like this. But the other 48 definitely do not. Rozado writes:
  • Steve, when you quote other people’s work you should really remember to add a link. Do you want to end up like Claudine Gay?

  • Yale became the second Ivy League college, after Dartmouth, after four years of test-optional admissions during the covid/George Floyd eras, to go back to making it mandatory for applicants to submit test scores. Why? Because the anti-test conventional wisdom is stupid. From Raj Chetty's shop, Opportunity Insights, a study of 12,000+ students at 12 elite...
  • Wait, students with a perfect 1600 on the SAT only average 0.43 better GPA than those with a mediocre 1200? That says a lot about college grade inflation!

    • Replies: @res
    @jb


    Wait, students with a perfect 1600 on the SAT only average 0.43 better GPA than those with a mediocre 1200? That says a lot about college grade inflation!
     
    Agreed. Another factor is choice of major. Though using first year GPA helps decrease that effect.

    The thing to really watch for with studies like that are whether they look within or between colleges and how variable those colleges are for difficulty and grading.
    , @Anonymous
    @jb

    That, and even very smart kids often don't like to do their homework.

  • From a Google executive responding to all the hilariously woke images created by Google's Gemini (formerly Bard) AI system, such as an American Indian lady 17th Century physicist: "images of a person walking a dog are universal!" Really? Many devout Muslims would disagree. From a Google
  • Google says they are going to fix the problem, but what that almost certainly means is that they are going to try to tune their AIs to stop producing woke output when the output is embarrassingly bad, but continue producing woke output when the badness is less obvious.

    Also, just for reference, the New York Post reports on this here and here.

  • From the New York Times news section: Sailer's Law of Mass Shootings is:
  • @Altai4
    One of the more remarkable things is how little terrorism the support from the US, UK and Germany for Israel's madness in Gaza has produced. On the contrary 6 year old Palestinian boy was stabbed to death and his mother injured outside Detroit by a white (Gentile? Polish name, possible it's either, particularly since he was a landlord.) American who'd been watching Fox News and CNN's coverage of events.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/16/us/chicago-muslim-boy-stabbing-investigation/index.html

    Ordinarily that sort of thing might dominate the news in the US and be a lesson in how evil American whites are but this time it got coverage but I'd bet money most of the commentators here had never heard of the story.

    Has any kind of interpersonal white on non-white violence come close to this incident in the last 20 years?

    Replies: @Old Prude, @Peter Akuleyev, @Almost Missouri, @jb, @ydydy

    Eh, the victims weren’t black so it wasn’t that important.

    What puzzles me is a story from a couple years back where a self-declared white supremacist traveled to New York City for the express purpose of killing black people and actually killed a random black man on the street. I was expecting it to be huge, but the story never went anywhere and I don’t know why. Maybe because even for the woke it’s hard to take seriously anyone who tries to start a race war with a sword?

  • Not having owned a dog from 1977-2022, I don't know much about dogs. But one thing I noticed at the dog park is that dog owners these days are extremely sensitive about getting your dog's pronouns right. They are always apologizing for calling your dog by the wrong pronouns. Yet, I've never met any dog...
  • I don’t think this is a recent thing. The sex of dogs isn’t always immediately obvious, and it seems to me that it’s always been the case that if I called a female dog “he” the owner would inform me (in a friendly way) that the dog was in fact a “she”. I don’t think this has anything to do with political correctness, just wanting to get the facts straight.

    And it makes perfect sense. If the dog is part of the family, and the owner sees the dog as a “she”, then naturally it’s going to bother him if you use the wrong pronoun. It would also bother him — although probably a lot more! — if you referred to his tomboyish daughter as “he”.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @jb

    The other reason it's good to know is that if "she" is on heat, and your male dog is intact, then there's always the possibility of impromptu mating, not good if "she" is a little dog and "he" is a big dog.

    , @Aphatgurl
    @jb

    I guess mentioning it was a eunuch might fit

    How’s “it” doing?

  • I can recall that in my first few days at Rice U. in 1976 explaining to all the non-Californians that while California is still relatively underpopulated, it's natural trajectory is to fill up with newcomers until it's as bad as anywhere else. Same, of course, for the United States. This is alway struck me as...
  • Hey, Canada may not be better than Punjab anymore, but it’s still better than Niger!

  • Republicans have been (very) slowly catching on that Democrats benefit in the long run electorally from mass immigration. In turn, Democrats are shocked, shocked to be hit with the infinitely racist accusation that they have self-interested reasons for backing immigration. Who ever heard of such a thing? From Aaron Sorkin's The West Wing in the...
  • @J.Ross
    @jb

    They filter nutrients out of the sand and exhale the atmosphere. The joke is that they're actually plants.

    Replies: @jb

    Okay. I suppose that’s no worse than the Star Wars space slugs I just looked up.

  • @New Dealer
    @MEH 0910

    Cool, I liked part 1 and will see part 2 when it is free.

    Reservations. Having had high school biology I agonizingly search for explanations of why the Fremen are mostly kind of middle eastern but 13% black and zero % NE Asian, etc.

    Also, Paul looks and acts like a kid on a middle school basketball team. Void of the charisma required for plot trajectory.

    Replies: @Intelligent Dasein, @jb, @Inquiring Mind

    What I want to know is what the sand worms are eating when they aren’t eating insufficiently arhythmic Freman. (It’s probably in the books somewhere, but I only managed to get through the first, and that was many years ago).

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @jb

    They filter nutrients out of the sand and exhale the atmosphere. The joke is that they're actually plants.

    Replies: @jb

  • @Anonymous
    Oh yes, the blind men and the Jewish elephant on the question of the "Great Replacement."

    Blind man 1: It's the Illuminati!
    Blind man 2: It's the Freemasons!
    Blind man 3: It's the Democrats!
    Blind man 4: It's the chamber of commerce!
    Blind man 5: It's Biden!
    Blind man 6: It's Communists!

    There's a good meme/graphic of "The blind men and the Jewish elephant" somewhere (which I can't find). "It's the elites!", "It's the Vatican!", "It's crab people!', "It's the Chicoms!"

    Unfortunately, we have Sailer saying "It's the Democrats!" He's very blind about things when he wants to be - when it serves his ethnic interests, that is.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @ginger bread man, @Anon, @jb, @AnotherDad, @Ron Mexico, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @NotAnonymousHere

    Just curious: are you claiming that there is an organized cabal of Jews somewhere making decisions and controlling things for the benefit of the Jews? That’s batshit crazy — there are much simpler and more plausible explanations that don’t involve the Elders of Zion — but I want to know if that’s what you are actually thinking.

  • Many long-time iSteve themes converged at last night's Grammy Awards ceremony: People who think Beyonce should win all the Grammys instead of just more than anybody else ever has, Tom Wolfe's discovery of modern America's obsession with Plaques for Blacks, black husbands gallantly making fools of themselves for their wives at awards shows, and how...
  • @Richard B
    @jb


    It’s sort of the Woke version of “the Jews control everything”.
     
    What don't they control?

    They control all finance and information. Check!
    Both of which serve as the foundation for all social institutions. Check!

    So, again, what don't they control?

    They might not control everyone's mind. But if someone speaks their mind in a way they don't approve of they censor them, while at the same time presenting their negative opinion of any individual or group they don't like as "the truth" in their attempt to destroy that individual or group's life (they call that chutzpah).

    So, again, what don't they control?

    Replies: @jb

    I was wondering if anybody was going to bite! 🙂

    There is a huge difference between “disproportionately influential” (which Jews clearly are) and “controls everything” (which implies some sort of cabal of Jews making decisions and giving orders as Jews). The former is true and unsurprising, given high Jewish IQs. The latter is idiotic. (David Cole has your number Richard). Jewish Leftists and non-Jewish Leftists are interchangeable. They belong to the same organizations; they think and act in lockstep; they even marry each other (e.g., A. G. Sulzberger: 1/4 Jewish, 3/4 liberal Protestant). There is no real distinction between them. Modern woke Leftism has it’s roots more in liberal Protestantism than in Judaism. Any problem you have with Jewish Leftists you also have with non-Jewish Leftists, which means it isn’t the Jews that are the problem, it’s the Left. (And that’s leaving aside all the Jews who aren’t Leftists, but who still get tagged and alienated when you say the problem is “the Jews” rather than “the Left”. God, the whole Jew thing is just so damn stupid…).

  • @Tiny Duck
    @Matthew Kelly

    You cared enough to respond

    The music industry was built on exclusion. Once exclusion was no longer an option, the inclusion of Black music has been curated, at least historically, very carefully, to absorb that music while minimizing black people.

    Calling the Grammys out for a pattern or a repeated practice of underplaying what Black artists have done in the same way that rarely is advocating for any one person about solely them and getting them what they should have.

    Beatles aren't Black; Elvis wasn't Black; Bob Dylan wasn't Black. But the influence of Black people allowed for the incorporation of Black musical style without Black people.

    So when the system was set up to center whiteness, that's just natural because that's what the recording industry was set up to do. It couldn't stay that way because regardless of what structures do, people are going to do something else. So in the '70s, you see the increasing popularity of Black music worldwide

    Replies: @tyrone, @jb, @Anon

    I can’t believe there are people out there who are dumb enough to believe that there are other people out there who are in charge of excluding blacks and “centering whiteness”. It’s sort of the Woke version of “the Jews control everything”.

    • Replies: @Richard B
    @jb


    It’s sort of the Woke version of “the Jews control everything”.
     
    What don't they control?

    They control all finance and information. Check!
    Both of which serve as the foundation for all social institutions. Check!

    So, again, what don't they control?

    They might not control everyone's mind. But if someone speaks their mind in a way they don't approve of they censor them, while at the same time presenting their negative opinion of any individual or group they don't like as "the truth" in their attempt to destroy that individual or group's life (they call that chutzpah).

    So, again, what don't they control?

    Replies: @jb

  • America has a stupid Presidential candidate selection system. We saw that in 2008 when 71 year old John McCain wrapped up the GOP nomination in early February, and then didn't get any younger by November. A few steps were then taken to make the process less dysfunctional. I believe Governor Schwarzenegger had the California primary,...
  • @AnotherDad
    @jb


    Until a little while ago I was rooting for the Fat One, but now that DeSantis is out of the race and the choice is Trump or Haley I no longer really care. (Trump and Haley are both bad, although in entirely different ways. With DeSantis there was at least possibility).
     
    If you think it's a coin toss between Haley and Trump there's something wrong with you.

    I would much rather that Trump had announced he was out as long as the Republicans had solid nationalist (MAGA) candidates he would campaign for them--but otherwise consider a third party. I.e. turn American nationalism over to the next generation. (DeSantis or someone else--if Trump was out there would have been others.)

    But a vote for Trump is a vote
    -- for American nationalism
    -- to keep/push on the transition of the Republican party into a party that represents the interests of Americans
    -- a big FU to our establishment of slimy parasites now wrecking the nation
    -- a vote to save our nation

    A vote for Halley is a vote
    -- to return the Republican party to the useless Bushie, corporativist, cucky, minoritarian light (3 decades behind) beltway parasitism that sells out its voters
    -- a vote to write off America and consign America to slumping toward Brazil ... or worse

    Replies: @Twinkie, @jb

    Trump is an incompetent narcissistic lying psychopath who is incapable of delivering on his promises (and would be even if he could avoid being hogtied by legal problems), whose abhorrent personality has alienated millions of potentially reachable voters and pushed them into the arms of the enemy, and who I simply do not trust not to do something really terrible if some crisis pushes his buttons right. That’s bad.

    You are right that Haley is an old school militaristic corporativist Conservatism Inc. Republican, and that’s bad too. But it’s possible the party is already too far gone towards nationalism for her to pull it back, and maybe she might recognize this and decide to ride the new wave. Maybe. But at least she is a normal person (at least a normal for a politician). I can’t emphasize enough how big a problem I think Trump’s crazy has been for our side! Yes, he kicked the door open, but after that I’m not sure he hasn’t done more harm than good.

    • Replies: @Twinkie
    @jb


    Trump is
     
    Someone who delivered the Supreme Court to the right for the first time in decades. That's more than all other Republicans.

    Replies: @HA

    , @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    @jb

    Trump didn't do half what his voters had hoped for but he was much better than Hillary would have been. And much better than Biden.

    Biden stood in front of a blood red flag, flanked by military men, and declared millions of Americans enemies of the state. The Usual Suspects try to memory-hole this.

    Nikki Haley is an anti-White affirmative action pick who would govern just like Biden. But she's already out of the picture.

    The main benefit of Trump is the thing you allude to: he "alienates", that is exposes and infuriates, tens of millions of Fake Americans. He makes them expose their hatred of real Americans and of White people in general. The hatred of Trump caused institutions like the FBI, the media, the Pentagon and CIA to drop the mask and show the actual American people what monsters they are.

    And that's a good thing. Let's hope for more!

    , @The Anti-Gnostic
    @jb

    There is nothing wrong with nationalism. Nationality is anti-fragile. The State can do a lot of things but it can't change who your ancestors were.

    Proposition nationhood is fragile. The proposition inevitably changes or gets hijacked. And when there's no more consensus on the proposition there's no more nationhood. Politics shift from What-How to Who-Whom.

    This is the fate of all multi-national empires. The US, Britain and most of the EU no longer even defend their own borders. There's no country without borders just like there's no property without metes and bounds.

    This is Humanity 101, and the ideological conservatives are flunking it.

  • Until a little while ago I was rooting for the Fat One, but now that DeSantis is out of the race and the choice is Trump or Haley I no longer really care. (Trump and Haley are both bad, although in entirely different ways. With DeSantis there was at least possibility).

    • Agree: Robertson
    • Replies: @HammerJack
    @jb

    You Republicans never cease to mystify me.

    , @AnotherDad
    @jb


    Until a little while ago I was rooting for the Fat One, but now that DeSantis is out of the race and the choice is Trump or Haley I no longer really care. (Trump and Haley are both bad, although in entirely different ways. With DeSantis there was at least possibility).
     
    If you think it's a coin toss between Haley and Trump there's something wrong with you.

    I would much rather that Trump had announced he was out as long as the Republicans had solid nationalist (MAGA) candidates he would campaign for them--but otherwise consider a third party. I.e. turn American nationalism over to the next generation. (DeSantis or someone else--if Trump was out there would have been others.)

    But a vote for Trump is a vote
    -- for American nationalism
    -- to keep/push on the transition of the Republican party into a party that represents the interests of Americans
    -- a big FU to our establishment of slimy parasites now wrecking the nation
    -- a vote to save our nation

    A vote for Halley is a vote
    -- to return the Republican party to the useless Bushie, corporativist, cucky, minoritarian light (3 decades behind) beltway parasitism that sells out its voters
    -- a vote to write off America and consign America to slumping toward Brazil ... or worse

    Replies: @Twinkie, @jb

  • James Hankins has been teaching history at Harvard since 1985. He's an expert on Renaissance political thought. Three of his many books have specialized on the Tuscan historian and statesman Leonardo Bruni (1370-1444). He's sort of a real life Ignatius J. Reilly from A Confederacy of Dunces. Hankins is not at all pleased by his...
  • I don’t see a link to the article, so here it is.

  • Genetic engineering, in its many varieties, is slowly becoming feasible. For example, last month the FDA approved two gene therapies for treating already-born people with sickle cell disease. Medical progress in recent decades has been slower than in the heroic 1850-1950 age, but it's likely to continue grinding forward. But what will people choose to...
  • @Right_On
    @Anon

    "How does the female peacock come to think that the male with the biggest tail is the hottest?"

    Mary Midgley suggested that the only credible explanation is that the peahen [sic] is responding to the beauty of the peacock's display. In other words, sexual selection could include aesthetic appreciation at a more primitive level of consciousness than scientific reductionism allows.

    Replies: @jb

    Ornithologist Richard Prum argues exactly that in his book The Evolution of Beauty, which makes the case that sexual selection is independent of — and often acts counter to — natural selection (i.e., selection for advantageous traits), and is in fact driven by the aesthetic sensibilities of animals. I find his argument quite persuasive, and I recommend the book.

  • Hitler was an unmitigated disaster on all fronts, but much of the harm he did has faded as the victims have passed on, while the harm he did in helping to “discredit” eugenics persists unabated.

    There were other factors of course. If you are opposed to involuntary sterilization of stupid people, OK, fine, let’s not do that. But without Hitler, I can imagine an alternative timeline where eugenic thinking is just part of the accepted conventional wisdom. Where smart, successful people face friendly social pressure to have big families. Where it’s just common sense that people who can’t afford to have children should be discouraged from having them. Where the media seeks out and celebrates brilliant children of brilliant parents, and says “See!” We were actually headed that way at the beginning of the 20th century, when eugenics was quite popular among thinking people. Instead, the society we live in makes it difficult for successful people to support children, celebrates those who don’t have any for “saving the planet”, while subsiding reproduction in the bottom tier because Social Justice. Thanks Adolf!

    • Thanks: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @jb

    Don't worry, the Chinese (who suffer no such shibboleths) will do it.

  • Razib Khan noticed that Google's Bard AI chatbot refuses to write an essay in the style of Razib Khan. So I tried it too: Me: Write an essay as Steve Sailer would write about why traffic deaths and homicides soared in 2020. Google Bard: I'm unable to fulfill your request to write an essay as...
  • Out of curiosity, what happens if you try Charles Murray? I’m wondering where the cutoff is.

    • Agree: Philip Neal
  • My anthology Noticing is now available in paperback for pre-order for $29.95. Publication date is late March 2024. I said the soft cover price would be "not unreasonable."
  • Out of curiosity, is this going to be available on Amazon? You don’t seem to be banned, plus the dropdown suggests that people are looking for Noticing there.

    • Replies: @Gordo
    @jb

    It would be nice as on Amazon delivery to UK would only be about $15.

  • From the New York Times opinion section: Hans Kundnani is half-Indian so, presumably, like so many other Indian intellectuals in the West, he has lots of relatives still stuck in India. Marina Wheeler explains in the New Statesman why Kundnani is mad that the European Union is supposed to benefit Europeans: It's almost as if...
  • Speaking of whiteness, from Focus Features, coming this March:

    The American Society of Magical Negroes.

    From the trailer it looks to be every bit as awful as you would think, in exactly the way you would think. But maybe, just maybe, it can be a step towards the much needed rehabilitation of the word “negro”. Much needed because in the coming decades we are going to really need a word that unambiguously says “sub-Saharan”.

  • From an interview of Penn law professor Amy Wax by Richard Hanania: Penn's law school ranks in the middle of the Top 14 law schools that provide most of the new lawyers who start working for Big Law firms at $175,000 or whatever. Professor Wax teaches a year long class on Conservative Thought at Penn....
  • If someone asks me to define Woke (some people seem to consider this a “gotcha” question) I have an easy enough answer: the belief that all of the world’s problems are due to oppression and nothing else. And as long as we are keeping things abstract I can elaborate with talk of Cultural Marxism and so on. But if asked for specific examples of wrongheaded Woke ideas, pretty much everything I can think of has to do with race or gender, and I worry that this makes me look kind of narrow, like I’m the one who is obsessed race and gender. I.e., like a stereotypical old fashioned bigot, albeit a bit more educated.

    So is that really it? Can everything consequential that Woke ideology has to say about the world be binned into race and gender? I guess there are other concerns, e.g., “ableism”, but the main focus there seems to be extending the list of oppressions to the greatest degree possible, just to emphasize the pervasiveness of Oppression. Nobody actually seems all that fired up by such isms, and nothing that is being proposed to remedy them is of any great consequence. They’re sideshows, while race and gender fully occupy center stage. (I can remember someone once referencing his “tall privilege” in a conversation, but it seemed pro forma, since it came up while he was looking for ways to explain white privilege to me. I doubt he saw it as an injustice that cried out to the heavens for redress). So am I missing something, or are race and gender really the whole show?

    • Replies: @Poirot
    @jb

    https://www.takimag.com/article/short-shaming/


    Short-Shaming

    Why is discrimination against the short considered not only tolerable, but also amusing? In an era constantly on the lookout for prejudices to denounce, this obvious one gets a pass.

    The main reason our culture doesn’t denounce short-shaming is highly revealing about the essential nature of wokeness.

    (…)

    It’s striking that height prejudice isn’t demonized today, even though it has disparate impact on immigrant ethnicities. (…) So height discrimination benefits whites.

    However, most concerns in the U.S. about racial inequality focus upon blacks versus whites, and black men, at a little over 5’9″, are almost as tall as white men.

    (…)

    An awareness of heightism first emerged in the early 1970s. The word “sexism” first appeared in print in 1968, and “heightism” naturally followed in 1971.

    On the other hand, enthusiasm for deploring heightism has largely faded.

    Why is heightism barely a term in 2019? Because it is more often women discriminating against men over height than men discriminating against women.

    (…)

    Criticizing women’s heightism seems like sexism.

    Our culture has increasingly lost interest in general principles and instead thinks, like Stalin, in terms of “Who? Whom?” Punching down at short men is fine these days because they are men, and thus are assumed to deserve to be whomed.
     
  • From my new column in Taki's Magazine: Read the whole thing
  • I’m short, and I never even made an effort at basketball, my sport was gymnastics. Muggsy Bogues would have been an astonishing gymnast!

  • A great historic challenge for the American republic was reconciliation between the North and South following the Civil War. The country remained deeply divided in the late 19th Century. For example, baseball had become the "national pastime" in the North during the Civil War as soldiers killed time playing baseball in Union army camps. Up...
  • @ScarletNumber
    @jb

    It's the button that says Insert MORE Tag to the upper-right of the comment box

    Replies: @jb

    Haha. I always enter tags by hand, including the blockquote tag, so I always ignored those buttons, and I never even noticed what the fourth one does.

  • @res

    Thanks for the link! However it looks like WordPress allows you to customize MORE blocks, which I couldn’t get to work on Unz, so it’s not quite the same.

  • @ScarletNumber
    @jb

    Yes, I posted that under the fold 🙂

    Replies: @jb

    Ah, I missed that. What’s the markup for the fold anyway? Is it specific to unz.com, or is it standard HTML that can be used elsewhere?

    • Replies: @ScarletNumber
    @jb

    It's the button that says Insert MORE Tag to the upper-right of the comment box

    Replies: @jb

    , @res
  • @ScarletNumber
    Sorry for the off-topic post but for those who normally don't watch Saturday Night Live, Weekend Update is now anchored by a white guy and a black guy. On occasion, they do a joke swap where one will write jokes for the other to read without having seen them first. It is a funny premise because they will veer into racism and stereotypes.

    So last night the black guy wrote some racist jokes for the white guy to say, but beforehand he brought out Dr. Hattie Davis, renowned civil rights leader, to sit next to the white guy while he told his racist jokes.

    https://twitter.com/nbcsnl/status/1736262866313822282

    The ultimate punchline:Dr. Hattie Davis isn't an actual person, they just hired an old black lady to sit next to the white guy to make him uncomfortable.

    Replies: @Curle, @Colin Wright, @Mike Tre, @ydydy, @R.G. Camara, @The Anti-Gnostic, @Rick P, @jb

    I have to say that bit was funnier than 99.9% of SNL. (Take that however you like). Part of the joke was that “Dr. Hattie Davis” is not a real person, just a character Michael Che invented to prank Colin Jost and make him even more uncomfortable telling Che’s racist jokes. (“The woman marched with King!”).

    • Replies: @ScarletNumber
    @jb

    Yes, I posted that under the fold 🙂

    Replies: @jb

  • Back when the George Floyd Racial Reckoning frenzy was at its peak of insanity in early June 2020, with the Mostly Peaceful Protests emptying the sneaker shops of America and burning down big city shopping streets, the New York Times op-ed page published an opinion piece by Republican Senator Tom Cotton calling for the military...
  • I thought everything in The Economist was behind a paywall, but this article doesn’t seem to be, and I don’t see any notes saying “You have X free articles left”. Does The Economist routinely make some articles open access?

  • The Law of Intersectionality proves that black women, because they are women and they are black, will have the most interesting ideas. Who can even dream of all the fascinating new intellectual innovations they have in store for us? Hence, in the Washington Post opinion section, an opinion editor tells us about such novel topics...
  • I’m biracial but was raised primarily by my mom, who is White and, honestly, not a reliable ally. …

    My mom is genuinely so out of touch that during one visit to the National Museum of African American History and Culture, she stopped random Black people to apologize … for … slavery? Oppression? Her outfit? I’m still not sure. (But I am certain that the memory remains just as excruciating for me.)

    Just imagine the organic White joy this piece must have given her mother!

    • Replies: @Harry Baldwin
    @jb

    “How sharper than a serpent’s tooth it is to have a thankless child.”

    --King Lear.

  • Political historian Rick Perlstein tweeted: I respond: Rick Perlstein responded: I answered: Perlstein answered: I said in response:
  • @Mr. Anon
    @AndrewR

    It doesn't matter. Unless you are a member of "X" (formerly Twitter) you can no longer view the threads, only the initial post. In some ways, Elon Musk has made twitter less of a public forum.

    Replies: @Wilkey, @jb

    I know, it’s as annoying as hell innit? I ended up joining through my Google account just so I could view the threads, but no way I’m posting anything. Musk, I have to say, is an awesomely brilliant bonehead!

  • @AndrewR
    Post the link, boomer

    Senior moment or early onset Alzheimer's?

    Replies: @tyrone, @Santoculto, @Dennis Dale, @Mr. Anon, @jb, @obwandiyag, @Frau Katze, @anon, @36 ulster

    Easy enough to Google it, but yeah, post the link.

  • From my new Taki's Magazine column: Read the whole thing there.
  • The logic of Woke censorship is very similar to the logic of historical censorship by the Catholic Church (e.g., the Index of Forbidden Books), and it actually makes a fair amount of sense. It goes like this: The truth of our doctrines is obvious and undeniable, in the same way that it is obvious and undeniable that 1+1=2. Only the foolish could be pursuaded otherwise! If a writer or a social movement were successful in pursuading the foolish that 1+1 did not equal 2 it would lead the foolish to do things that would cause great harm to the foolish themselves and to society as a whole; therefore suppressing such writers or social movements is always justified, as their words can only lead to harm, never to good.

    Sounds reasonable, doesn’t it? It’s hard for me to think of realistic examples of ideas so dangerous that I personally would want to suppress them (denying that 1+1=2 doesn’t really cut it for me), but if you are convinced that wrong thinking can send people to Hell, or turn them into a Nazi zombies, suppression really does seem warranted. (I am reminded of a capsule description I saw somewhere of Herbert Marcuse’s Repressive Tolerance, which essentially went “A world in which the Holocaust is possible is a world in which it is too dangerous to allow conservatives to have freedom of speech”).

    • Agree: Erik L
    • Replies: @MNL
    @jb

    I agree. But even more important than "doing harm to one's self and others," the Catholic church centuries earlier (and today's woke equivalents) didn't (and don't) want to relenquish power and authority.

    , @The Spiritual Works of Mercy
    @jb


    The logic of Woke censorship is very similar to the logic of historical censorship by the Catholic Church (e.g., the Index of Forbidden Books), and it actually makes a fair amount of sense.
     
    No, it's not. The logic of the (old) Holy Office was that error has no rights. The logic of Woke censorship is more like, those we hate don't have rights. There is no doctrine or intellectual foundation the woke are at pains to defend. Their censorship is ad hoc and their instrument is blunt, shouting speakers down from the podium by protest, and such.

    Anyways, the best case for censorship was the story of St Ignatius's conversion. He wanted to read some tawdry romance novels but the only books they had were The Life of Christ and Flowers of the Saints. The rest is history.
  • The now popular notion that "race does not exist" or that "race is a social construct" have grown greatly in use in books in recent decades, according to Google's Ngram of American books published in English from 1800 to 2019. (I don't know what context "race does not exist" was used in the 1840s to...
  • @ic1000
    @ic1000

    Ugh. It looks like one has to know which "Show replies" buttons to press, to read this discussion. Below the fold is the (a?) transcript.

    @Steve_Sailer (12:45 PM Nov 15, 2023) -- Here are links to the underlying academic paper announcing the new raceless algorithm. Strikingly, it doesn't include a comparison of its accuracy vs. the old 2013 algorithm:
    [res' comment #59 at iSteve post]

    .
    @StoneBiology -- you're reading the wrong paper they do a direct comparison (it outperforms the old equation)

    https://ahajournals.org/doi/epdf/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067626

    .
    @Steve_Sailer -- The AHA improved its algorithm from 2013 to 2023 in a number of noncontroversial scientific ways, but that hardly proves it didn't hurt its algorithm, ceteris paribus, by dropping race as a factor.

    .
    @SashaGusevPosts -- This is a very weasely way of acknowledging that the new algorithm that drops race is more accurate

    .
    @Steve_Sailer -- Are you familiar with the concept of ceteris paribus?

    .
    @SashaGusevPosts -- It's not possible to hold all conditions equal, this isn't a breeding program. But is there a reason you lied about the study right from the start?

    .
    @Steve_Sailer -- In updating a risk model like the American Heart Association's, it's very much possible to hold all else equal while assessing each proposed change. The AHA has the data on what the accuracy would be with and without race as a factor, but they decided not to publish it.

    .
    @SashaGusevPosts -- This is incorrect. Adding a race interaction substantially changes the model structure and also limits your training data to studies that have harmonized race. Now can you explain why you lied about the study?

    .
    @SouthernWintrs [Will I Am - e/acc - 1:47 AM · Nov 17, 2023] -- Ablation studies are a very common technique when studying algorithm design.

    You can train the same model with any factor and one without the same factor and compare accuracies.

    This is a very standard study design if one wants to be honest about changes to an algorithm.

    ·
    @SashaGusevPosts -- Steve's not asking for an ablation study, he wants a new model that uses race, which will change the model structure and the training set (to studies that have harmonized race). This after the old model using race was shown to be inferior.

    .
    @SouthernWintrs -- If you take an honest and good faith reading at what he is saying, he wants the new model to be tested with race being included and excluded as a factor, aka a standard ablation study.

    .
    @SashaGusevPosts -- It's not an ablation study if you didn't use the feature in building the model! This is basic stuff.

    .
    @SouthernWintrs -- You can add and remove features in a statistical model pretty easily! Ablation models are even used to add and remove architectural features of a model to test if they have an effect.

    .
    @SashaGusevPosts -- Adding features is not ablation. And you can't add features that weren't collected in your training data.

    .
    @SouthernWintrs -- [posts image of text with emphasis added]
    "In Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Machine Learning (ML), ablation is the removal of a component of an AI system. An ablation study investigates the performance of an AI system by removing certain components to understand the contribution of the component to the overall system."

    .
    @SashaGusevPosts -- Your quote confirms my point

    .
    @SouthernWintrs -- It absolutely does not. A study comparing the model with and without race as a feature would be an ablation study. And given the use of race in previous models, ceteris paribus, you'd need an ablation study to show whether it makes a model better or worse.

    .
    @SashaGusevPosts -- I can't believe your still having this conversation not knowing the difference between taking an existing feature out of the model (ablation) and adding a new feature (a new model). Sailer really does a number on the brain.

    .
    @SouthernWintrs -- The original model had race. The new model does not have race. Other things were presumably changed about the model. To make a valid comparison between models to see if race was a factor, you would add race to the new model and compare the new model with and without race as a factor. That is where your ablation study comes in.

    A priori making the decision to not include race when it was included in the previous model and was a significant factor without such a comparison is pretty much scientific malpractice. The only way someone can justify it is on ideological grounds. We know two [sic] things:

    1. Previous model used race
    2. Race was a significant factor in the previous model.
    3. New model doesn't use race.

    Saying that the new model should be tested using race, isn't some crazy out of the world demand. It should be the default position given what we know previously. Without that ablation study, you can't claim that race isn't a significant factor here. You just have no proof for that. Sailer has better proof because the previous model used race and it was a significant factor.

    Replies: @Intelligent Dasein, @candid_observer, @res, @jb, @res

    Ugh. It looks like one has to know which “Show replies” buttons to press, to read this discussion.

    The Twitter user interface is pretty useless. Way back in the 90s I was active on Usenet, which served a function similar to that of Twitter (i.e., basically a giant universal chat room), and I have to say Usenet was superior to Twitter in a number of important ways. For example, rather than being a single space, Usenet actually consisted of a large number of separate chat rooms (newsgroups), so you could focus a discussion on a particular subject; however if appropriate it was also possible to spread a single discussion across multiple newsgroups via crossposting.

    The newsreader I used was trn, which was in some ways very primitive, having a text-based rather than graphical user interface. Yet despite this limitation trn, because it was a threaded news client, was able to effectively display large portions of the discussion tree, so you could see at a glance which posts had the most replies, and how deep the discussion went. I really haven’t seen anything that sophisticated since. Of course you had to learn a large number of keystroke commands to use trn effectively, and given how much the Internet has dumbed down since the early days I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised that nobody has tried to match its functionality.

    (BTW, although most of the discussion that took place on Usenet has moved to various web forums, including Twitter, Usenet is still active. It can be accessed through Google Groups, but it is not a a service provided by Google, and in fact it predates the World Wide Web itself. If you have a Unix shell account somewhere you can still access it via clients like trn).

    • Thanks: ic1000
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @jb

    Of course Usenet was better. sci*, alt.*, soc.*.... Those were the days. These were almost academic discussions.

  • The single most hated idea in modern society is the idea that black people might not be as smart as white people. I believe the popularity of the “race does not exist” meme is almost entirely due to the belief that it rules out this dreaded possibility a priori.

    Of course it doesn’t, any more than it rules out the possibility that black people might have darker skin than white people, or curlier hair. Whatever language you want to use to describe it, it is undeniable that people from different parts of the world differ in many physical traits, and there is no reason that intelligence couldn’t be one of those traits. If people could be made to understand this I think most would lose interest in denying the existence of race; the problem is that understanding this argument takes just enough effort that if someone doesn’t want to go there you can’t make them go there. And the people pushing the meme really, really do not want to go there!

    • Agree: Mark G., bomag
    • Replies: @Sleep
    @jb

    I remember hearing "there's no race!" from the same student in high school who at another time also stated, as if it were plain to all, that Asians are smarter than whites. I don't think an adult would let that slip out ... acknowledging one racial IQ gap suggests it's overwhelmingly likely that others exist, and we have a lot more evidence for the black-white gap than for the white-Asian gap. Fortunately my high school wasn't a place where students went on trial for things they said. I suppose I could add she wasn't Asian and I don't think there were any Asians in the class.

    I suspect even some people who tell us race does not exist might also believe things that flatly contradict it, and be afraid to say so out loud. It could even be a coping mechanism ... the ones who tell us the most loudly that there is no such thing as race are the ones who desperately wish it were true because all the evidence they see points to the opposite, less pleasing, conclusion. But I can't read minds.

    And yes. I suspect the "race does not exist" slogan has a much stronger effect on children than on adults. The impression I get is that whats being pumped into kids' minds in schools these days is so far removed from reality that the thought of racial intelligence differences won't even occur to them. Yet, the Left is at cross purposes with itself, because if there are no races, how do they blame white people for all of the world's problems? I saw a children's book a few days ago containing the sentence "White people made up an idea called race".

    I've a hunch they're getting ready to rule by brute force instead of relying on the increasingly tenuous arguments. "Okay, race does exist! You figured it out! And your race is at the bottom because you're the weakest and softest. Too bad!" That's if the "everyone against white people" coalition can hold .... it probably won't work everywhere, but we see places like Portland OR doing it already which proves they can push white people around even while whites are still a majority.

    As an aside, can we all agree that the world would be a better place if the black race really was just as smart as whites? I've run into a few leftists who seem to believe that the whole race/IQ debate is about whites trying to prove that blacks are less intelligent to make ourselves feel better. This seems like a ridiculously easy argument to counter, but the few times it's come up in a debate I'm in I've been awash in other things, and I don't really focus on race/IQ anymore.

  • There's an interesting debate at Marginal Revolution over the patterns of extinction of big game around the world as humans show up over the last 100,000 years. Here's my super-stylized (i.e., not terribly well-informed) model: - Africa was at one extreme. Humans largely evolved there, so megafauna co-evolved alongside us to not trust humans and...
  • That’s my best guess.

    I think that has to be pretty much everybody’s first guess. But there seems to be more and more evidence that humans showed up in the New World 22,000 years ago, rather that 15,000. So why didn’t all the big animals go extinct then? Maybe those first humans had forgotten how to hunt for some reason? Or were never very good at it? It just seems odd.

  • From my new column in Taki's Magazine: Read the whole thing there.
  • [I posted this almost 7 hours ago but it seems to have been swallowed by the comment system, so I’m trying again.]

    “Diversity” has always been a code word for affirmative action. Its purpose has always been to benefit the Oppressed at the expense of the Oppressor. The reason the word has been so wildly popular on the left is that it allows you to obscure the fact that you are taking away from one group and giving to another — something the losers might feel they had a right to object to — and frame it instead as everyone winning.

    In principle there might be situations where diversity might mean whites benefiting at the expense of blacks, or men benefiting at the expense of women, but in practice this never happens. Indeed, if a situation like this ever did arise it would just feel wrong to diversity supporters, and you just know they would find some way to argue that this wasn’t a case of true diversity.

  • @jb
    "Diversity" has always been a code word for affirmative action. Its purpose has always been to benefit the Oppressed at the expense of the Oppressor. The reason the word has been so wildly popular on the left is that it allows you to obscure the fact that you are taking away from one group and giving to another -- something the losers might feel they had a right to object to -- and frame it instead as everyone winning.

    In principle there might be situations where diversity might mean whites benefiting at the expense of blacks, or men benefiting at the expense of women, but in practice this never happens. Indeed, if a situation like this ever did arise it would just feel wrong to diversity supporters, and you just know they would find some way to argue that this wasn't a case of true diversity.

    Replies: @jb, @ScarletNumber, @Director95, @Moses, @Anon

    Just wondering why this comment (the comment I’m responding to) has been languishing for over two hours while 12 comments that were posted later have been approved. I did notice that when I posted, instead of appearing with a “Your comment is awaiting moderation” notice, the comment simply disappeared (something I’ve seen before), and it didn’t show up as awaiting moderation until I refreshed about an hour later, so maybe there’s some quirk in the comment system and the comment got lost.

  • “Diversity” has always been a code word for affirmative action. Its purpose has always been to benefit the Oppressed at the expense of the Oppressor. The reason the word has been so wildly popular on the left is that it allows you to obscure the fact that you are taking away from one group and giving to another — something the losers might feel they had a right to object to — and frame it instead as everyone winning.

    In principle there might be situations where diversity might mean whites benefiting at the expense of blacks, or men benefiting at the expense of women, but in practice this never happens. Indeed, if a situation like this ever did arise it would just feel wrong to diversity supporters, and you just know they would find some way to argue that this wasn’t a case of true diversity.

    • Replies: @jb
    @jb

    Just wondering why this comment (the comment I'm responding to) has been languishing for over two hours while 12 comments that were posted later have been approved. I did notice that when I posted, instead of appearing with a "Your comment is awaiting moderation" notice, the comment simply disappeared (something I've seen before), and it didn't show up as awaiting moderation until I refreshed about an hour later, so maybe there's some quirk in the comment system and the comment got lost.

    , @ScarletNumber
    @jb


    “Diversity” has always been a code word for affirmative action.
     
    Consider two schools.
    School A is 95% black, 4% Hispanic, 1% white.
    School B is 43% Hispanic, 35% white, 11% black, 11% Asian

    A liberal would say that School A is more diverse, while someone being intellectually honest would say that School B is more diverse.

    The reason the word has been so wildly popular on the left is that it allows you to obscure the fact that you are taking away from one group and giving to another — something the losers might feel they had a right to object to — and frame it instead as everyone winning
     
    This is an example of the motte-and-bailey fallacy.

    In principle there might be situations where diversity might mean whites benefiting at the expense of blacks, or men benefiting at the expense of women, but in practice this never happens.
     
    Sometimes in education (especially in elementary education or special education) a school may hire a man over a more-qualified woman just so the school (or department) isn't completely overrun by women. I would imagine this happens in nursing as well, but in both cases the fields are not prestigious and are derided as "woman's work".
    , @Director95
    @jb

    I agree with your conclusions.
    I would only add that, in American practice: Diversity = anti-white.

    I have been saying for years that we need more diversity in the NBA. Asians are sorely under-represented.

    , @Moses
    @jb

    Huh. In my experience "Diversity" means "Fewer Whites, preferably none."

    , @Anon
    @jb

    Your entire comment is patently false.

    Diversity literally means that the set contains lots of different kinds of things. In society, it literally means having a less homogeneous population. In the US, that would mean, more Hispanic, more Asian, more black people.

    As for taking from "winners" and giving to "losers," why do you hate this so much? Our society is ridiculously unequal. Do office workers really provide 4x as much value as laborers? Of course not.

    In addition, social capital and the environment you grew up in plays a major role in your earnings later in life.

    The winners and losers are not even *fair* "winners" and "losers," and they are not rewarded fairly. So even if you loooooovvvvvvveeeee watching people "win" and "lose", why would you like the current game of life that we are playing, in which the team with fewer goals might win?

  • From the opinion page of the Utah Deseret News: Perspective: The excesses of equity politics in higher ed Utah State University needed an insect ecologist. Applicants had to show a track record supportive of DEI By John D. Sailer Nov 2, 2023, 8:00pm PDT Last year, Utah State University sought a professor in solid earth...
  • By John D. Sailer
    Nov 2, 2023, 8:00pm PDT

    OK, gotta ask. Any relation?

  • From the Washington Post news section: And then all those cool black people will get into bird-watching! Sometime next year, the society is expected to appoint a committee to explore up to 80 new names. The move, at an organization known for its reluctance to rename birds, was su
  • “There is power in a name…”

    Well there is definitely power in being able to force the people you hate to rename things that have had established names for hundreds of years. That’s what this is all about! It’s an exercise of power! Nobody is actually being hurt by those names. Very few are even aware of their origin. But it is the prerogative of power to say “you shall have nothing that is offensive to me”, and that’s what the black activists and their white allies are asserting. That’s why they are so diligent in seeking out any name or artifact, however obscure, that they can cast as being in some way tainted. Every time they can force a change they are both reaffirming their own power and further entrenching the source of that power: the idea that, because of their history, what black people want is more important than what anyone else wants.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman, Hail
    • Thanks: Liza
  • From the Guardian: He was a Numidian Berber from Cirta (now Constantine) in modern Algeria, just inland from the Mediterranean. the formerly enslaved Olaudah Equiano, who became an abolitionist and writer; Mary Seacole, who provided sustenance and care for British soldiers during the Crimean war, and the composer Samuel Coleridge-Ta
  • I wonder if the people who are saying this sort of thing truly believe that blacks have “been there all along”, or if they see it as a “noble lie” that is required for social harmony. Or is it somehow both at the same time? It’s hard to believe that anyone could be so ignorant as to believe that Cheddar Man had anything to do with sub-Saharan Africans, or so lax that they can’t be bothered to look up Quintus Lollius Urbicus on Wikipedia. (It’s such a pity that the Guardian does not have comments).

    • Agree: Pastit
  • Somebody worked fanatically hard at concocting the coloring of this world map of the mythical Female Hotness Index: I haven't traveled that much, but my impression in 1980 from 6 weeks in Western Europe (never getting to Iberia or Scandinavia) was that Milan was clearly #1. Indeed, this map suggests a north to south decline...
  • @Peter Akuleyev
    @Hapalong Cassidy

    When I was growing up in the 1980s, the South was certainly where the hottest women were, with Texas number one. But that was because Southern women were more feminine and tried harder, not genetics. Women in the Northeast tended to be kind of dumpy and wore horrible 80s fashion. My sense is that is no longer the case. College educated young women in cities in the Northeast are now far hotter than they were four decades ago because they are all in shape and want to look good on social media. Meanwhile there is a lot more obesity in the South and too many tattoos. Plus the demographic mix has changed a lot - more unattractive overweight hispanics in the South, a lot more pretty Asian girls in the Northeast. Still a lot of pretty girls in Texas but far less of a difference than two generations ago.

    Replies: @jb

    Most European and Asian women (I’d use the word “Eurasian”, but in this context that seems to mean something more specific) would be at least a 7 if they kept themselves fit and slim and didn’t ruin it with tats and piercings.

  • A tweet thread from economic historian Joachim Voth (@joachim_voth): Oct 20 Why? What did the Nazis do to get so much support in areas where Christian religiosity had largely died? T
  • The woke — along with many conventional liberals — see Hitler as a sort of Dark God who is forever threatening to burst out of the grave. I once ran that analogy past a Jewish friend of mine who is quite liberal but by no means woke, and he nodded and said “yep, that’s pretty much how I feel.”

    • Agree: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    @jb


    [...] see Hitler as a sort of Dark God who is forever threatening to burst out of the grave.
     
    Most White Gentiles seem to agree with that. They think that after what Hitler did, we simply can't be trusted with anything but post-political governance. It's pathetic but that seems to be where most of our people still are.
    , @Gc
    @jb

    Well, you can't even name a boy Adolf, which was a very common name in Europe. You can't even wear old bourgouse style mustachs. I say there is a lot of going here psycholocigally, not for just jews. Anyway, it's ironic that after messing with christianity you get nazism with almost somekind of marxian necessity.

  • As a man, I've probably been mansplained to more than 98% of women have, precisely because men sense that I may very well be interested in their extremely detailed explanations of things of zero concern to me personally. Which I often am. Perhaps mansplaining is the fault of guys like me because we tend to...
  • @Anonymous
    @jb


    Beyond that, I have no sympathy for a cop who continues kneeling on a handcuffed suspect’s neck (or back, or whatever you nitpickers) for three minutes after his partner says he can’t find a pulse.
     
    So you are saying that Chauvin was trying to kill Floyd?

    Replies: @jb

    I think it’s clear that Chauvin was not trying to kill Floyd. But under Minnesota law the intent to kill is not required for a murder conviction. I don’t like this myself. My intuitive understanding of “murder” does require an intent to kill. But that’s not the law in most states. (And I stand by my characterization of Chauvin as an asshole cop. I would have preferred a verdict of manslaughter myself, but I can’t bring myself to feel much sympathy for him, and I certainly don’t see him as any sort of martyr).

    • Replies: @JimDandy
    @jb

    But he didn't kill the man. Or cause his death. Or contribute to his death. You want him convicted of manslaughter for being "an asshole" (translation: a cop who did his job).

  • @Bill Jones
    Here's some man explaining something.

    "The Whole George Floyd Story Was A Lie": Tucker Carlson

     

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/whole-george-floyd-story-was-lie-tucker-carlson

    Replies: @Erik L, @jb

    I agree that the George Floyd incident has been grossly misrepresented, but it has nothing to do with fentanyl. This is yet another example of rightists screwing themselves by gloming on to “hoax” narratives while missing the true point. I watched the trial carefully, and came to the reluctant conclusion that under Minnesota law the guilty verdict was indeed reasonable. Addicts can survive much higher concentrations of drugs in their blood than non-addicts, so there is no guarantee that the fentanyl by itself would have killed Floyd. And the law was quite clear that Chauvin could still be found guilty of murder even if fentanyl also contributed to Floyd’s death. Beyond that, I have no sympathy for a cop who continues kneeling on a handcuffed suspect’s neck (or back, or whatever you nitpickers) for three minutes after his partner says he can’t find a pulse. Chauvin was being an asshole cop, someone died, and he paid the price. Please don’t try to make him a glorious martyr for the cause.

    The true counter-narrative should focus on two simple and indisputable points:

    1) There is absolutely no evidence that George Floyd’s death had anything to do with race or racism. It was never even alleged that Chauvin or any of the other officers said or did anything that would imply any sort of racial bias against Floyd. The “fact” that it was a “racist killing” is based entirely on the fact that “everyone knows” that’s what it was.

    2) The same sort of thing happens to white people too (e.g., Tony Timpa and Danial Shaver). Such incidents don’t feed into the moral panic over racism, so the mainstream media finds them uninteresting and doesn’t report them, leading people to think that only blacks die this way, so what else could it be but racism? The possibility that the police are not racist, that they are simply fallible humans who screw up sometimes, never enters the discussion.

    All of the social changes stemming from the Floyd hysteria have been powered by the sense that Floyd’s death proved once and for all that the anti-racists were totally right about America, that almost 60 years after the Civil Rights Act it remains a deeply and intransigently racist society, and so extreme measures are justified. This is the false perception that must be fought. Quibbling over highly arguable issues like whether George Floyd had enough fentanyl in his blood to kill him doesn’t help.

    • Troll: JimDandy
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
    @jb

    I 100% agree and thank you. I was writing similar comments when the trial was going on (to what response you can well imagine).

    My brief with the Right's response to this whole unfortunate situation was that it doesn't ultimately matter what killed George Floyd. Even if I'm dying of an overdose, that doesn't give a police officer the right to pin me to the ground until I'm good and dead. Derek Chauvin, as a police officer, would have been trained in first aid and would have had a first aid kit in his car with naloxone in it. He could have attempted to render some type of aid. The way he handled the situation was inexcusable.

    I also don't want to hear about what a horrible human being George Floyd was, which I don't dispute. Police officers have to be held to a higher standard. You know when you take that job that you will be dealing with a lot of human filth, and that resuscitating an overdosing junkie in your custody is one of the unsavory but necessary duties of a peace officer in a civilized society. The police are not remitted to perform public euthanasia, even if society would be better off without someone like Floyd.

    What Derek Chauvin did was a crime. Even if it was a bit of a stretch for the murder statute, the optics were bad enough that a conviction was probably inevitable. It's very unfortunate that this "played into the racial panic," as you put it. In the interests of justice, it should be explained again and again that this was not a racially motivated murder. You are correct about that as well.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    , @Anonymous
    @jb


    Beyond that, I have no sympathy for a cop who continues kneeling on a handcuffed suspect’s neck (or back, or whatever you nitpickers) for three minutes after his partner says he can’t find a pulse.
     
    So you are saying that Chauvin was trying to kill Floyd?

    Replies: @jb

    , @Nicholas Stix
    @jb

    Officer Derek Chauvin followed his training to the letter. There were no grounds for his indictment, much less his conviction. You can’t be indicted and convicted for following your training. You’ve reversed the burden of proof.

    Floyd hadn’t just ingested enough fentanyl to kill him him three times over, but also meth, thc, and he had just had covid.

    The Floyd hysteria was based on lies on top of lies on top of lies, going back generations. Genocidal, anti-White racists do nothing but lie about Whites 24/7. They have given us hoax after hoax after hoax. The problem has always been that people who know better are too cowardly to point that out. There are terms for such people, e.g., “republicans,” “conservatives,” “traitors,” etc. They cost us our country.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    , @Hypnotoad666
    @jb

    Whatever. We've got a new national understanding to keep people like you from worrying yourselves about racism. Cops will just stay away and let blacks die of their own actions in the streets. It's Steve's favorite issue. What are we up to? 26K extra dead blacks? Check in with Steve, he's keeping count.

    Everybody understands now the best strategy with blacks is just "keep away."

    Replies: @Alice in Wonderland

  • @Henry's Cat
    Do you deny that you give preferential moderation treatment to panhandling contributors?

    Replies: @SFG, @jb, @Erik L, @Kylie, @Corvinus, @Hibernian

    Given that we are all using fake names and emails, how exactly is Steve going to know who chipped in?

    • Agree: mc23
  • @Achmed E. Newman

    That said, please don’t expect me to read every bit of your mansplanation of the mechanics of the phenomenon known as mansplaining. I’ll probably just scan it for bad words and then hit “Approve” a frustrating 17 hours after you posted it ...
     
    Isn't that the same deal for comments about anything? I figured it's about your sleep hours.

    You never explained why you moderate comments to begin with, as opposed to the way some of the columnists/bloggers/writers do it. Doing it, though, has got to be a lot of work, unless you just skim for certain words or phrases. (Then again, a piece of software can be used to do that.)

    Replies: @jb

    It’s possible to write a comment that is extremely objectionable without using any bad words (especially given the, um, delicacy of many of the topics discussed here). I’ve noticed that the overall level of discourse here never dips below a certain level, as it often does in the comment sections of certain other blogs, and I assume this is due to moderation. In addition, a moderation delay can be good in and of itself, as it discourages tit-for-tat comment wars. So I hit “Approve” on Steve’s “at whim” moderation policy and appreciate whatever time and effort goes into it.

  • I've been noting for several years the unintentionally hilarious rise of the Black Rest movement. For example, from the new issue of The New Yorker:
  • @Kylie
    Does this mean it's okay to call blacks "nappy"?

    Replies: @jb

    Oh nuts, I was hoping nobody else had made that joke but I guess it was too obvious.

    • Replies: @Kylie
    @jb

    "Oh nuts, I was hoping nobody else had made that joke but I guess it was too obvious."

    Lol! Couldn't resist, it has such fond associations for me. "Nappy" reminds me of Steve's use of "stabby", which just tickles me no end.

    And of my old friend's favorite insult, "snaggle-toothed, nappy-headed black mother******". Say it out loud. It has real ring to it.

  • We just recently passed the 22nd anniversary of the 9/11 Attacks, the greatest terrorist strike in human history and an event whose political reverberations dominated world politics for most of the two decades that followed. Our Iraq War was soon triggered as a consequence, a disastrous decision that dramatically transformed the political map of the...
  • I haven’t forgotten about the anthrax attacks, and they continue to make me nervous. I don’t care much about who was responsible for the last one; what bothers me is the fact that such a thing is even possible. And it’s only going to get easier as our knowledge advances! My fear is that the world will end in neither fire nor ice, it will be a depressed biotech grad student using a DIY gene splicing kit he ordered on Amazon.

  • I read a diet book by the Three's Company actress in the 1990s, and her scientific theory seemed to work better for me than the standard nutritional advice of the time to eat less fat and more carbohydrates. Nah, Suzanne Somers said, you want to eat more protein and fat (and complex carbs like vegetables)...
  • @Twinkie
    OT: this is right up your alley, Mr. Sailer: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/10/16/marines-black-fighter-pilots/

    Zach Mullins was used to walking into rooms filled with White faces. But he was taken aback when, at an air show last year in San Diego, a man approached to ask: “Did you know that you’re the only Black fighter pilot in the Marine Corps?”

    Mullins, who flies F/A-18 Hornets, is one of five, in fact. But in recalling the exchange, he said that, “I never really thought about the numbers just because it was the job that I wanted to do” — though it was “a little staggering,” the Marine captain conceded, to learn the number of African Americans in elite jobs like his was so small.
     


    There are 60 Black fighter pilots in the Air Force, or 2 percent of the community. Navy data show 15 Black pilots out of 1,124, about 1.3 percent.
     
    Only five black Marine fighter pilots? Well, of course, this lack of diversity is totally unacceptable!

    Statistics provided by the Marine Corps show that, in the past two years, about 35 percent of newly commissioned lieutenants came from what the service calls diverse backgrounds, defined as anyone other than a White male. The data show, too, that last year nearly 45 percent of those enrolled in enlisted-to-officer programs were categorized as diverse.
     
    Ooops, still too many pale males, I guess. By all means, let's entrust a machine that weighs 37,000 lbs, can fly in excess of 1,000 mph, and is loaded to the gills with stuff that go boom to people who can't hack it.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @Old Prude, @Old Prude, @AceDeuce, @Cool Shoes, @jb, @tyrone, @Anon, @Adolf Smith, @Seneca44, @Corn, @anonymous

    …about 35 percent of newly commissioned lieutenants came from what the service calls diverse backgrounds, defined as anyone other than a White male.

    I’ve actually seen the term “diverse individual” used to refer to people who had the property of not being a straight white male. I’ve seen it more than once, in official corporate contexts. This seems like a contradiction in terms — how can an “individual” be “diverse”? — but nobody bats an eye.

  • Here's some good news. There's been a million dollar contest going on to figure out how to use high tech to read a Herculaneum library of extremely fragile scrolls that were damaged by the 79 AD Mt. Vesuvius eruption. They can't be unrolled without crumbling into dust. But now we have particle accelerators. The extremely...
  • I read an article about this project a while back, and whoever wrote it had some reason to think that the owner of the scrolls had a special interest some minor writer or cult or something, and that there was a good chance that if do manage to image the text we won’t find anything particularly interesting, no lost plays or histories or philosophy from anyone important. I’m not sure how anyone could know this today, but that’s what I remember reading.

  • Here's me on the Charlie Kirk Show this morning:  
  • Wait, Steve SailYer?

    • Replies: @Anonymous, @Hail
    @jb

    Charlie Kirk said "Sailyer" or "Sail-ee-yer" at least twice.

    See my comments above on Kirk reading a script in his introduction to Sailer.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @J.Ross

    , @J1234
    @jb


    Wait, Steve SailYer?
     
    I think of him as Steve Salient. Good interview, Steve.
  • From my new column in Taki's Magazine: Mute Inglorious Shakespeares Steve Sailer October 11, 2023 In Michael Lewis’ new biography of Sam Bankman-Fried, Going Infinite, Lewis quotes the accused cryptocurrency embezzler’s rationalist case against Shakespeare: I could go on and on about the failings of Shakespeare…but really I shouldn’t need to: the Bayesian priors are...
  • Weirdly, horse racing, a sport with vast sums spent on eugenic breeding, isn’t getting all that much faster.

    There are two way to eugenically improve a population: The quick way is to increase the frequency of favorable genes and decrease the frequency of unfavorable genes through selective breeding. The slow way is to wait for new favorable mutations to arise by chance. The quick way can transform a small founding population of mostly Arabian horses into a larger and moderately faster population of thoroughbreds. The slow way can transform Eohippus into Equus. So the explanation for why horses aren’t getting any faster is that we’ve already optimized them all we can — there aren’t any further gains to be wrung out of existing genetic variation, and new genes aren’t coming coming fast enough to make a difference on the time scale we’re interested in. The implications for eugenics on humans are fairly obvious: we might be able to create a population of Shakespeares and Einsteins, but not science fiction god-men with IQs of 1000. (Shakespeares and Einsteins would be pretty good though).

    (I assume it would be possible in principle to speed things up by genetically engineering faster horses and smarter people using something like CRISPR, but people would scream, and at least for now we don’t understand the genetic architecture of horses or humans well enough to make it work. I should ask ChatGPT about this…).

    Also, Pierre Menard is one of my favorite JLB stories, and not something I was expecting to pop up in this context!

    • Replies: @Dmon
    @jb


    (I assume it would be possible in principle to speed things up by genetically engineering faster horses and smarter people using something like CRISPR, but people would scream, and at least for now we don’t understand the genetic architecture of horses or humans well enough to make it work. I should ask ChatGPT about this…).
     
    Simple - just splice some octopus DNA into a horse. 8 legs, should go twice as fast. Pfizer's probably already got something - just waiting for the liability waiver.
  • Andrew Gelman, the professor of statistics at Columbia whose skeptical blog has done a lot over the years to better standards of statistical analysis, blogs: Two celebrity Harvard experts on dishonesty, Dan Ariely and Francesca Gino, have been accused of dishonesty. Ariely is a professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke with
  • @Bill Jones

    Phase 1: Collect underpants

    Phase 2: Then a miracle occurs…

    Phase 3: Profit

    (Seriously, this is one of the all time great science cartoons. And fairly true to life! I can remember my physics professors waving their hands and using the word “miracle” on more than one occasion).

  • @New Dealer
    @jb

    1. Connectionism in psychology

    2. Neural networks, machine learning, artificial intelligence

    There's a lot of malarkey and fluff in all the sciences, not just social science. But 5 to 10% of output is worth keeping. I could easily cite another dozen examples in social science.

    Replies: @jb

    Nope, computer science, not social science. Nothing to do with human behavior. If you have other examples I’d like to see them, but remember I’m looking for examples of surprising findings about human behavior that have been put to practical use. For example “priming” and “nudging” could in principle be put to practical use, but they haven’t held up well. And while the heritability of personality traits is well established, it is neither surprising nor, as far as I know, ever been used in any practical way.

    • Replies: @New Dealer
    @jb

    That's like saying, Math, not engineering! or Math, not physics!

    Game theory originated with von Neumann, modeling a two-person zero-sum game. Strategic interaction of two persons = social science. Nobel-winning economist Thomas Schelling (a professor of foreign policy, national security, nuclear strategy, and arms control) imaginatively showed how to apply noncooperative game theory to many kinds of human interactions, yielding great insights.

    Many social scientists use various forms of mathematics. One of 10,000 examples: James Coleman's Foundations of Social Theory. Probability, statistics, and research design are routine. Game theory, social-network analysis, calculus (economics) and more.

    Connectionism was pioneered by psychologists in the 1950s and much furthered by psychologists Rumelhart and McClelland then at UC San Diego. Without their work, no neural nets, no machine learning, no AI. Maybe you think history is bunk as well.

    The debates about how best to model human mental processes involved even -- gasp -- philosophers.

    An outstanding example is Berkeley Heidegerrian philosopher Dreyfus. He famously showed how the preceding computational model of mental processes was mistaken and correctly predicted the failure of that giant research program.

    "I know nothing about X, hence X is worthless" is not a valid inference.

    Replies: @res, @Hypnotoad666

  • @New Dealer
    @jb

    Let's start with

    1. Game theory &

    2. Game theory

    Replies: @jb

    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @jb

    "Game theory is math, not social science."


    Game theory at bottom is economics, which is a combination of math and social science, and maybe magical thinking also.

    I used to date a leading proponent of game theory, and let me tell you, she had an early life that was so complicated and banged-up, it was a game theory all on its own.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJSQxbedplM&list=RDMM&index=27

    Replies: @obwandiyag

  • There may be an easy answer to this that I am missing, but can anyone name any finding in the social sciences in the last 50 years (or ever really) that: 1) was unexpected or counterintuitive; and 2) was put into routine productive use in any way?

    • Replies: @New Dealer
    @jb

    Let's start with

    1. Game theory &

    2. Game theory

    Replies: @jb

    , @New Dealer
    @jb

    1. Connectionism in psychology

    2. Neural networks, machine learning, artificial intelligence

    There's a lot of malarkey and fluff in all the sciences, not just social science. But 5 to 10% of output is worth keeping. I could easily cite another dozen examples in social science.

    Replies: @jb

    , @SafeNow
    @jb

    Sure. Placebos can work even when the subject is told by the doctor, this is a placebo. Pretty counter-intuitive, I would say.
    https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/placebo-can-work-even-know-placebo-201607079926

    There are many of these but I think my favorite is this: There exists a methodology whereby two strangers who have never spoken to each other and do not share a preexisting “key” of any kind can have a conversation, and establish a secret from an interloper who hears every word of their conversation. In an article I read about this, the author called it one of the most counterintuitive findings in the history of science.

    Replies: @James J. O'Meara, @Anonymous, @dearieme, @dearieme, @simp

    , @Erik L
    @jb

    I think the trick here might be "unexpected" or "counterintuitive". Behavioral Economics has some examples but you could argue that the findings were only unexpected to economists

    Replies: @Known Fact

    , @HA
    @jb

    "There may be an easy answer to this that I am missing, but can anyone name any finding in the social sciences in the last 50 years (or ever really) that: 1) was unexpected or counterintuitive; and 2) was put into routine productive use in any way?"

    The six-degrees-of-separation study is been complemented with network theory to help deal with terrorist networks. I'm not saying that anything touted as an advance won't itself be called into question at some point (as with criminal profiling), but that's another matter.

    The understanding that pedophilia (and any number of other paraphilias/addictions/compulsions) cannot be undone with any present therapy, but at best can be managed somewhat (e.g. chemical castration in the case of pedophiles). It wasn't just crazy fundamentalists who thought that gays and drunks and meth-heads could be cured with a visit to a camp or rehab center or tent-show ministry -- psychologists were once convinced they too could turn all that around, for the right fee. Rehab is definitely still a thing, but no one who studies the statistics is all that hopeful about how well it works.

    I suspect the way we go about screening out pedophiles from jobs where they might gain access to victims has also undergone a radical shift, partly due to the understanding that pedophilia is an actual identifiable disorder. Time will tell as to how productive that has been.

    Replies: @MM, @PeterIke, @Art Deco

    , @Prester John
    @jb

    When did the so-called "social sciences" become elevated to the level of physics, chemistry, biology etc?

    , @Anonymous Jew
    @jb

    How about social science research that is common sense but completely ignored? Such as Putnam’s research showing the negative effects of diversity (and also DiversityTM).

    A lot of Haidt’s findings are slightly counterintuitive - or at least not obvious. Not sure if there’s economic utility there.

    , @Je Suis Omar Mateen
    @jb

    Neurolinguistic programming, NLP?

    Maybe it's intuitive and obvious, I dunno.... But it is real and it is used a lot.

    , @smetana
    @jb

    Index investing theory is over 50 years old by now.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Fama

  • From The Atlantic: The Horror Stories of Black Hair The Hulu series The Other Black Girl dramatizes the pains of managing Afro-textured hair—and other people’s perceptions of it. By Hannah Giorgis SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 In the 1989 surrealist satire Chameleon Street, two Black men bicker after one says that he prefers women with light skin...
  • A thought: Sub-Saharan Africans seem to be looked down on worldwide, and I find myself wondering how much of that is due to their unattractive features: the weird hair in particular, but also the nose, lips, and jutting jaws, all of which distance them visually from the rest of humanity. If sub-Saharans all had straight hair like the Indians they get their weaves from, and the sort of noble features you sometimes see on Ethiopians, but were in all other ways as problematic as they are now, would they still be as disliked?

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @jb

    Seriously?

    People have been tolerant as all hell with these people. The problem they've got is that people keep judging them by the contents of their characters. Sorry, MiLKy, we gave it a shot.

    , @Kylie
    @jb

    "If sub-Saharans all had straight hair like the Indians they get their weaves from, and the sort of noble features you sometimes see on Ethiopians, but were in all other ways as problematic as they are now, would they still be as disliked?"

    Yes.

    I'm guessing you haven't spent much time in close quarters with them. Just a guess.

  • @ic1000
    Predating internet times, there used to be an influental magazine called "The Atlantic;" I subscribed for many years! Its editors commissioned thoughtful pieces about culture, science, foreign policy, economics, media affairs, and the like. Kind of like a printed iSteve, albeit one with a fairly narrow Center-Left Overton Window.

    It seems possible that the owners of this money-losing woke clickbait venture are aware of the pedigree of the website name that they've registered -- maybe "Decline and Decay" is their core concept. Or it could be a coincidence, nothing more.

    Replies: @Prester John, @Anonymous, @Known Fact, @Renard, @res, @AndrewR, @Hypnotoad666, @jb, @J.Ross, @Jim Don Bob

    I’ve had a subscription to The Atlantic since the 70s, and as magazines go it’s still pretty good (and still somewhat influential I believe). And it sometimes even publishes articles that might be considered anti-woke (or at least woke-dubious). It also publishes a lot of articles on its web site, like this one, that don’t appear in the print magazine, and are more random in quality.

  • Back around April 1, 2022, after 10.5 years on Twitter, I was up to 40k Twitter followers. Then Elon Musk bid for Twitter (or X or whatever it's lamely called now). Now I've reached 100k Twitter followers, which suggests the Old Twitter was treating me the way Stalin treated Bulgakov, author of The Master and...
  • Totally, totally, totally OT, but I can’t resist:

    Rich White Beast: A BWWM Romance

    🙂

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    @jb

    Seems to be part of a whole genre romance of novels (a.k.a. pornography for women) all on the BW-WM theme.

    Since the market for these books is ~100% female, and one suspects the market for this particular genre is about ~100% blackish, ...

    Well, draw your own conclusions.

  • It was nice to find several checks in my PO Box today in the wake of the August fundraising drive. The reader who sent an extremely generous one requested more podcast and video interviews, so here's a new podcast interview I did:
  • @HallParvey
    @jb


    You may be against all racist hate (as any reasonable person should be)
     
    What kind of hate is acceptable?

    Replies: @jb

    What kind of hate is acceptable?

    There are those saintly individuals who preach that all hatred is misguided, but for myself I would say hatred for those who do harm, either to yourself or others. You know: “I hate you because you slaughtered my family, burned my village, and pillaged my sheep!”

    Of course it’s true that the meaning hate is often stretched beyond reasonable bounds. And there is also the problem that I may see you as doing harm while you see what you are doing as good. Fortunately there are gradations of hatred, from mild annoyance to “You slaughtered…”, and it’s usually possible to pick something appropriate.

  • @Mike Tre
    @jb

    "You may be against all racist hate (as any reasonable person should be),"

    False premise. Racial preferences (what the fake word racism partially defines in its ever expanding umbrella) have nothing to do with hate. Preferring to live and work and do business with one's own kind isn't hate. In fact it's a fundamental component of basic survival.

    Reasonable people should observe and understand the differences between different races, and be free to act accordingly. That is common sense, not hate.

    Replies: @jb

    There is in fact a such thing as “racist hate” (which can be directed at whites, blacks, or others), and it is not the same as “racial preference”. The former is bad, the latter is neutral.

  • @Adolf Smith
    @jb

    I did an Agree on ya,but I can't help but think your comment is an example of the consevative credo that victory can only be attained by never,ever,ever fighting back.
    The time will come, someday,to speak out,but not now.
    Race,sex,the Jews,the wars,immigration,all that stuff might upset the precious white suburban woman,so keep it on the DL.
    Trumps a jerk,who screwed things up,but at least the SOB bloodied the other guys nose.
    He brought these issues out.

    Replies: @jb

    I strongly believe in fighting back, but we are not fighting from a position of strength, and we desperately need to avoid friendly fire. Trump did bring these issues out (not the Jews though — he doesn’t seem to have the Jew Thing, for which I am extremely grateful, because I think that one is a huge loser), and if he had played his cards right and been more careful with his words he could have had even the suburban women nodding along, but instead I am afraid that in the end he has made the situation worse, that all in all he has made our enemies stronger. I don’t want four more years of Biden, but Trump is so profoundly erratic and irresponsible that leaving aside all political and ideological considerations the thought of him in the White House for another four years scares me just as much. And I don’t see any white knights on the horizon. DeSantis seems to have the most potential, so he would be my pick — once in power he might (or might not) turn into a “smart Trump.” But he seems to be nowhere near overtaking Trump in the polls.

    Frankly, at this point I am rooting for a health crisis.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @jb


    if he had played his cards right and been more careful with his words he could have had even the suburban women nodding along,
     
    Are these the same suburban women who hated Romney for being a vicious dog-abuser? Maybe you should consider who puts these ideas in the heads of silly females?
  • @Citizen of a Silly Country
    @Steve Sailer

    Yes, but what are you for? Citizenism?

    If so, you should explain why you hold out hope for a strategy that has achieved none of its goals for more than 50 years.

    Indeed, it's biggest and most successful proponent was attacked by the entire system, thwarted while on office and now faces trumped up (no pun intended) criminal charges.

    (You also might explain why you so dislike the most popular proponent of Citizenism.)

    Replies: @jb, @Corvinus

    Trump wasn’t attacked because he was a citizenist. He was attacked because he was a flaming jackass who handed his head to his enemies on a silver platter so many times that it is impossible to keep count. He is by far the most incompetent politician I’ve ever seen in my life — which is deeply tragic, because he has a great platform (that’s what got him elected, not his winning personality), and if he had had the skills to follow through he could have engineered a realignment in American (and perhaps Western?) politics. He held all the strongest cards — Jobs! Immigration! Foreign Wars! — and he pissed all over those cards and made it so much harder for anyone else to use them. He is precisely the disaster I was afraid he might be back in 2016.

    • Replies: @Adolf Smith
    @jb

    I did an Agree on ya,but I can't help but think your comment is an example of the consevative credo that victory can only be attained by never,ever,ever fighting back.
    The time will come, someday,to speak out,but not now.
    Race,sex,the Jews,the wars,immigration,all that stuff might upset the precious white suburban woman,so keep it on the DL.
    Trumps a jerk,who screwed things up,but at least the SOB bloodied the other guys nose.
    He brought these issues out.

    Replies: @jb

    , @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    @jb

    Trump still thinks he's living in Nixon's America. He's trying to appeal to that type of Normie worldview which is dying off. But Trump's style shook USA dullards to their cores. The Stuff White People Like crowd, in between helping their daughter get mutilated by psycho doctors, were just outraged!

    Sadly, Trump hired the kind of moderate Establishment clowns that got us in this mess.
    However, Trump was still way better than any alternative. And hd has changed our culture whether he wanted to or not.

    Replies: @HallParvey

  • @Steve Sailer
    @jb

    I'm against racist hate.

    Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country, @jb, @Corvinus

    You may be against all racist hate (as any reasonable person should be), but since the only racist hate in America that is not already being vociferously condemned is that which is directed at whites, by highlighting it and calling it out you have effectively made yourself a pro-white advocate, however racially neutral your own political ideals may be.

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @jb

    "You may be against all racist hate (as any reasonable person should be),"

    False premise. Racial preferences (what the fake word racism partially defines in its ever expanding umbrella) have nothing to do with hate. Preferring to live and work and do business with one's own kind isn't hate. In fact it's a fundamental component of basic survival.

    Reasonable people should observe and understand the differences between different races, and be free to act accordingly. That is common sense, not hate.

    Replies: @jb

    , @HallParvey
    @jb


    You may be against all racist hate (as any reasonable person should be)
     
    What kind of hate is acceptable?

    Replies: @jb

  • @Anonymous
    @jb

    White nationalism isn’t the issue. That’s an ideology from yesteryear. I agree that a pro-white doesn’t need to be a WN. But you’re projecting things on Steve that he himself denies.

    Look at the debate between Jared Taylor and Steve Sailer and see for yourself. As Jared Taylor noted, Sailer’s vision of citizenism is eerily similar to the basic approach of Marxism. That is, extinguish natural instincts and go for some artificial construct. Sailer rejects racial consciousness for whites. That ain’t being pro-white.

    Replies: @jb

    You’re just unhappy because Steve isn’t using his platform to say the things you would say if people were listening to you. But nobody is listening to you, while quite a few people are listening to Steve, and many of the things he has to say — naming and calling out anti-white hatred being merely one example — are extremely important and do in fact advance the interests of white people, without being tied to any specific racial ideology.

    If what you are after is racial solidarity based on “natural instincts” (a concept I am a rather dubious about), then making white people understand that they are targets of hatred will help advance your cause. But even if all you want to do is end “reverse racism”, well, making white people understand that they are targets of hatred is still going to help your cause. Helping white people understand the forces arrayed against them is good for whites no matter what your specific political goals are. So I stand by what I said: Steve is one of the most effective and influential pro-white voices in America.

    • Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @jb

    I'm against racist hate.

    Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country, @jb, @Corvinus

  • @Anonymous
    @jb

    Steve Sailer isn’t pro-white. He has argued against such a position. He had a debate with Jared Taylor about it.

    Replies: @jb

    Steve is not a white nationalist, but you don’t have to be a white nationalist to be pro-white. Steve has written extensively about the barely concealed anti-white hatred at the core of progressive social ideology — explicitly naming it as anti-white hatred, which is a big deal — and he has reached a significant audience, an audience that includes influential people. By any reasonable measure that counts as effective pro-white advocacy. The fact that he is not a white nationalist makes him more effective, not less.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @jb

    White nationalism isn’t the issue. That’s an ideology from yesteryear. I agree that a pro-white doesn’t need to be a WN. But you’re projecting things on Steve that he himself denies.

    Look at the debate between Jared Taylor and Steve Sailer and see for yourself. As Jared Taylor noted, Sailer’s vision of citizenism is eerily similar to the basic approach of Marxism. That is, extinguish natural instincts and go for some artificial construct. Sailer rejects racial consciousness for whites. That ain’t being pro-white.

    Replies: @jb

  • From my new column in Taki's Magazine: America’s Untouchables Steve Sailer September 06, 2023 In this decade, America’s most effective conservative activist has likely been Chris Rufo, who in 2020 came up with a winning euphemism for all the racist antiwhite hate suffusing our schools, streets, and screens during the racial reckoning: “Critical Race Theory,”...
  • Possibly of interest to Steve: The Plight of the N.F.L. Running Back

    N.F.L. running backs, once the face of many teams, have fallen so far in relative value over the last few decades that it has amounted to a public demotion.

    They have seen their contributions derided by data analysts, and their pay slip in relation even to unglamorous offensive linemen. This past off-season, some staged holdouts and others organized a Zoom call to try to fight against their predicament. But the evolution of the game toward passing — and a salary structure that doesn’t reward their brief prime years — may mean that running backs never recover the market power they once had.

  • It was nice to find several checks in my PO Box today in the wake of the August fundraising drive. The reader who sent an extremely generous one requested more podcast and video interviews, so here's a new podcast interview I did:
  • Just FYI, I don’t like podcasts and rarely listen to them. There are only so many hours in a day! (If there’s a transcript though I might read it). (And I do understand that sitting down and being interviewed is a lot less time consuming than writing your own stuff, so I can’t really begrudge you that).

  • @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    Thank God all those checks are coming in to keep White people on the CivCuck project.

    We wouldn't want White people to be on their own side. Steve Sailer has warned us we'd be like Al Sharpton if we do that! I love how that image is waved like a scarecrow in the face of concerned Whites to scare them away from collective consciousness.

    It's doubly funny because Whites have had a long history of being on their own side in the past. Obviously, the whole HBD thing has played out as a (deliberate?) time waster.

    Steve plays the "really nice guy" schtick, but somehow I don't think good people try to thwart the necessary defense of their own people.

    Replies: @jb, @Reg Cæsar, @Hypnotoad666, @AnotherDad

    What are you talking about? Steve is one of the most influential pro-white voices in America! You upset because he isn’t calling for repatriation or the return of slavery or something?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @jb

    Steve Sailer isn’t pro-white. He has argued against such a position. He had a debate with Jared Taylor about it.

    Replies: @jb

  • An interesting question is why such a disproportionate fraction of affirmative action cheaters in this century have been women. Let's focus on whites who claim American Indian status: Pretendians. Was the gender gap always like this? I don't think so. American Indian culture tended to be extremely masculine. So in the past it appealed more...
  • I had a male IT coworker late 80s/early 90s who was something of a wanabe Indian. He would spend his vacations hanging out with Indian tribes somewhere taking part in their rituals or something (it was never clear and I didn’t press). It wasn’t something he talked about much though, and he never claimed to be Indian. He was also gay, which may have had something to do with it. (For all the talk of how badly alphabet people were oppressed back then, the way I remember it nobody at work cared).

  • An interesting historical question is when did the culture change from baseball sluggers modestly running toward first base upon crushed contact as if their homers might not clear the fence to standing at the plate to admire their mighty blasts? Ballplayers can tell with a high degree of accuracy when they've ripped a home run,...
  • Totally off topic for this article but totally on topic for Steve, from Foreign Policy magazine: Demography Is Destiny in Africa.

    Not as much to see though as one might wish. There is a nice version of Steve’s “Most Important Chart” that includes Asia. A projection that sub-Saharan Africa will account for (only) a third of the world’s population by 2100, which is somewhat undercut by a projection of a sharp decline in African fertility, which will supposedly drop to replacement level by the end of the century. (Demographers have never been right about this before, so I guess they are due). And of course no discussion of emigration.

  • It looks to me like Ohtani posed (or at least paused) after his double. Did he think it was gone?

  • An anonymous iSteve commenter suggests that "access" is the coming euphemism: To paraphrase John Maynard Keynes, the Woke can change euphemisms longer than you can remain awake. When will it be time for "empowerment" to come back?
  • @rebel yell
    @jb

    “The white race is the cancer on history.” - Susan Sontag
    This is a succinct statement that most liberals and everyone on the far left would agree with. By white race she means Goyim.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @jb

    The precise language matters. It’s true that many liberals and leftists have a gut feeling that there is something intrinsically bad about white people and “whiteness”, but only the most extreme will agree, even in the privacy of their own minds, to a phrase like “the cancer of human history”. The great majority of liberals and leftists see themselves as fair minded people who are opposed to injustice — which, somehow, always seems to be inflicted by white people. But they aren’t bigots! They aren’t anti-white! That isn’t even a thing!!! The goal is to find language that will get past their defenses and make them understand that it is a thing, that the rhetoric they have been nodding their heads to is in fact anti-white, that it targets an entire race of people because of the color of their skin and who their ancestors were. Finding the language to force this realization could potentially change a lot of minds.

    Separately, I am dismayed at the level of Jew hate on Unz. Do you really believe that the Elders of Zion regularly gather in secret conclaves to discuss the next steps in their nefarious plans? If not, then how does their Jewishness matter? Personally I see absolutely no daylight between liberal Jews and liberal Goys. They think the same thoughts, move in the same circles, and intermarry heavily. (A. G. Sulzberger, publisher of the supposedly Jewish New York Times, is in fact only one quarter Jewish). Jews have perfectly understandable historical reasons for leaning left, and they excel in politics and academia for the same reason they excel in science and business: they have high IQs. But I see zero evidence that there are any Jews at all who act collectively as Jews against non-Jews. I see only liberals who happen to be Jewish, and who are otherwise indistinguishable from liberals who aren’t Jews.

    • Replies: @Nicholas Stix
    @jb


    “The precise language matters.”
     
    You’re wasting your time. These people are immune to facts, logic, and principles.

    “Separately, I am dismayed at the level of Jew hate on Unz.”
     
    The same criticism is equally true of the Unz neo-Nazis.

    Steve attracts a great many brilliant, courageous minds. However, since his primary site is here, he also attracts Unzlers.

    However, I must make a caveat. Many of my most supportive readers over the past 23 years (online) have been neo-Nazis! (Even Alex Linder grew fond of me, once we went through the formality of threatening to kill each other. However, he then felt the need to be extra insulting, in speaking of me to his followers ["Jew Stix"], in order to placate them, and ease their suspicions.) Only my neo-Nazis are not your typical Unzler neo-Nazis. All neo-Nazis are not created equal.

    https://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2007/10/white-supremacist-jew-and-knoxville.html

    Replies: @SFG

    , @AnotherDad
    @jb


    Separately, I am dismayed at the level of Jew hate on Unz. Do you really believe that the Elders of Zion regularly gather in secret conclaves to discuss the next steps in their nefarious plans?
     
    Well there is the "Biden" Administration.
    , @rebel yell
    @jb

    You miss my point. Liberals don't have Jews in mind when they complain about white supremacy and white privilege - they aren't saying "Jews are the cancer on history." They aren't thinking of whites in general - they are thinking of white gentiles. Susan Sontag certainly did not include Jews in her definition of cancerous whites. She isn't really thinking of whites at all, as that would include Jews. She could as well said "White Christians are the cancer on history," or simply "Christians are the cancer on history," and it would have covered exactly the same people she had in mind when she said white.
    Who says I hate Jews? What does dislike for hatred targeted at gentiles have to do with hating Jews? I suppose the new definition of Antisemite is calling out bigotry toward gentiles. Does it make you uncomfortable to be reminded that Jews have a bigoted slur for gentiles, Goyim?

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    , @Bill Jones
  • @AnotherDad
    @Achmed E. Newman


    People keep skipping one, “Afro-American”, in that sequence. It should be “Negro, Colored, Afro-American, Black, and then African-America. I could go back a little further though …
     
    I'd say, the "officially approved" sequence was:

    Negro, Colored, Negro, Black, (Afro-American never reaching either popular majority or official status), African-American, and now Black again.

    The single positive from BLM is that it basically nuked the tedious, make-'em-jump-through-hoops, "African-American". And "black" is the reasonable name. There was no need to use a Spanish word.

    Replies: @jb, @Prester John, @prosa123

    The Spanish word is really the best though, because it is the only one that unambiguously says “sub-Saharan.” I would like to see it come back.

  • @Achmed E. Newman
    @jb

    Sure, "We're Communists". That's what you said, but this is shorter.

    Replies: @jb

    No, that is exactly the kind of language I am trying to avoid!

    To begin with, for most people “Communist” means Comintern style Marxism-Leninism, which was not anti-white, so using the word just confuses the issue. There is an analogy of course — traditional Marxism identified the Bourgeoisie as the oppressor that had illegitimately stolen its wealth from the Proletariat — but it isn’t the same, and talking like it is is counterproductive. (I do think “Cultural Marxism” can be a useful term, but you have to define it carefully and make clear the distinctions between it and traditional Marxism).

    Beyond that, you missed my point. I’m looking for language that the Leftists themselves would identify with. That’s a lot harder than just calling them names! The point of the exercise is that there are a lot of borderline “Cultural Leftists” who have just blindly absorbed the language and thinking of the Left because it sounded nice and was the thing to do, without really understanding what was implied. I want to make those people say to themselves “Wait, is that what I actually believe?” “Is that what I want to believe?” You can’t do this by accusing them of something that they see as wildly wrong (like being a Communist); you have to accuse them of something that seems kinda right, but is also, once you actually think about it, kinda distasteful.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @jb


    To begin with, for most people “Communist” means Comintern style Marxism-Leninism, which was not anti-white, so using the word just confuses the issue.
     
    "Racial Collectivist" might be more accurate. There is a collectivism based on class and a collectivism based on race. The collectivism based on class, Marxism, was largely discredited with its failure in the Soviet Union and China and they then moved away from it. Putin and Xi are more semi-authoritarian types and not hardline Marxists.

    The left had to look for a replacement after the failure of Marxism and they came up with a collectivism based on race starting in the nineties. Back then I saw it called multiculturalism and its enforcement arm was called political correctness. Multiculturalism was basically an antiwhite ideology. Now it is often called "wokeism". The woke left is made up of nonwhites and corrupt and parasitical white elites who collaborate with them.

    Whites, particularly Anglo whites, have historically been the most individualist and least collectivist race. It was whites who adopted the belief that individuals have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. This is an alien ideology to most nonwhites. For this reason, it is important to make sure whites remain a majority in currently white countries that have universal voting.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @jb


    Beyond that, you missed my point. I’m looking for language that the Leftists themselves would identify with. That’s a lot harder than just calling them names!
     
    See, this is your problem, JB. You seem to care what the ctrl-left wants, but you don't actually know what they want. I do.

    The ctrl-left Communists want to destroy traditional society. That's why I use that term, as the Communists throughout history had the same goal. They were "Los Resentidos" ("The Resentful Ones) - plenty of people get bad breaks in life, but these useful idiots get convinced by people less stupid and more evil that destroying society is the answer to their problems.

    Your effort to convince them of what they ought to call themselves is a wasted effort. They'd rather NOT have your logic and truth.

    Therefore, I purposely call them Communists, because a) It's the best term I've got and b) It still holds sway with people and pisses off those whom I call this name. That's what I want.

    You all need to quit playing whiffle ball with people that play hardball. You're getting nowhere!
  • I think it’s useful to try to boil down to the simplest possible core what it is that the Left is really saying with all this diversity talk, using language that the Leftists themselves would agree with (at least privately). My current best effort: “White people have too much, it was acquired illegitimately, and it needs to be taken from them”. Can anyone best this?

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @jb

    Sure, "We're Communists". That's what you said, but this is shorter.

    Replies: @jb

    , @Frau Katze
    @jb


    My current best effort: “White people have too much, it was acquired illegitimately, and it needs to be taken from them”. Can anyone best this?
     
    “White men” might be more accurate.
    , @rebel yell
    @jb

    “The white race is the cancer on history.” - Susan Sontag
    This is a succinct statement that most liberals and everyone on the far left would agree with. By white race she means Goyim.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @jb

  • From the New York Times news section:
  • Because of the amount of time that had passed, I had come to assume that Putin had some sort of 4-D chess rational for allowing Prigozhin to live. But no, he’s a judo guy after all.

    (Alternative hypothesis: Prigozhin is alive, in a dungeon somewhere, wishing he had been on that plane).

  • The U.S. fertility rate peaked around 2006 during the Housing Bubble and collapsed around 2008. So American colleges have long been leerily worried about the years around the years 2025-2027, when they expect applicants to drop sharply. West Virginia is a poor state with the lowest NAEP school test scores among whites, which have been...
  • Gordon Gee and Roy Beck: separated at birth?

  • Similarly, I'd always been puzzled by how Charles Schulz's Snoopy didn't seem to look much like beagles I'd seen. By the way, when I was a kid a relative always gave me for Christmas the latest annual Peanuts anthology. Around 1971 or 1972 when my critical instincts were blossoming, I went back through the last...
  • @theMann
    Sam Hurt's "Eyebeam" was better than any of them.
    Darby Conley's "Get Fuzzy" also deserves consideration, although he is less into the occasional philosophical rumination and just sticks to funny.


    Personally, I think Peanuts peaked around 1960 or so, but it kept churning along for four more decades of declining mediocrity. Watterson had sense enough to end things when he ran out of ideas, as a consequence, Calvin and Hobbes remains brilliant from beginning to end - the norm is to keep taking the money while the quality decines.

    If you are wondering why Eyebeam was the GOAT, you have to look at the actual panels as drawn. Hurt always kept in mind that he was drawing a comic strip, and the flights of artistic whimsy slipped into the panels were always something to look for.

    "I'm getting sick of cow chow
    I'm growing bored with sex
    I'm indisposed to plow now
    Tyrannnosaurus Rex"

    Replies: @jb, @Prester John, @anonymous, @obwandiyag

    If you like Eyebeam you might appreciate Odd Bodkins. Very weird, and very 60s.

  • @Jim Don Bob
    I read an interview with Bill Watterson recently (can't find it now) where he admits the his perfectionism with the strip dominated his life so he finally quit. He also said his syndicate was after him for years to merchandise his characters, which he resisted.

    Or maybe he and Gary Larson realized they had nothing left to say and quit before the quality went to hell, e.g., Doonesbury.

    Replies: @jb, @Art Deco, @Old Prude

    I’m a big fan of Pearls Before Swine. It seems that Bill Watterson is as well, because he briefly came out of retirement to collaborate with Stephan Pastis on a week’s worth of strips (sequence starts here). I haven’t heard of him doing that with anyone else.

  • It seems that Christopher Caldwell also thought that Snoopy was the problem, although for different reasons than you. (That article originally appeared in New York Press, but unfortunately the original link is dead).

  • I started getting the impression that Peanuts was going downhill in the early 70s. There was one comic in particular, this one, that struck me even at the time as an inflection point. We didn’t have the expression “jumping the shark” back then, but it seems appropriate. From then on the comic just seemed to lose focus. For example Schulz introduced Snoopy’s brother Spike in 1975, and seemed very taken with the character, but the strips involving Spike all just seemed kind of lame to me. I like comics, so I kept reading, but I never felt it recovered to the level of the 60s.

    • Agree: Old Prude
  • From the New York Times, an excerpt from a new non-fiction book about a vast brouhaha at an upscale Bay Area high school involving mentally unhealthy liberal teenage girls, hair-touching, and nooses: From Albany HS's website: The
  • I was just reading this article in the Times and thinking “oh man, this is right up Steve’s alley, I should post a comment”, and then I come here and…

  • From the New York Times news section: Bradley Cooper is Irish and Italian. Lots of Italians play Jews and lots of Jews play Italians, such as James Caan as Sonny Corleone. Irish playing Jews and vice-versa are rarer, but hardly unknown, such as Cillian Murphy in Oppenheimer. Mrs. Bernstein was born in Costa Rica to...
  • @Jack D
    @Altai3


    The classic paradigm of Ashkenazi genetics is Sephardic Jewish/Italian crossed with Slavs.
     
    That's not correct. 1st of all, Sephardic means "Spanish". Most Ashkenazi Jews are not descended from Spanish Jews. Nor is there much Slavic admixture either. Italian is correct. Basically speaking, Ashkenazi Jews are Middle Eastern on the paternal line and Italian on the maternal. The best guess is that they are descended from a small group of single male Jews who ended up in Rome and married local women.

    However, the ancestry of Jews is not so different than that of other Europeans that it is impossible for a Jew to play a non-Jew or vice versa. For Bradley Cooper to play Bernstein or for James Caan to play Sonny Corleone is not like them trying to play Nelson Mandela or casting Jackie Chan as Moshe Dayan. As much as it may pain some people here, Jews are basically European white people with a different religion. (The people of the Levant are also basically Mediterranean European white people - would this family attract attention on the streets of Naples?)

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1f/Al_Assad_family.jpg

    So much pain has been caused by the failure to accept this basic fact.

    Yes, there are stereotypical looking Jews who could not play Leif Ericson but neither could most Italians. On the other hand, there are some Jews with blond hair and blue eyes such as Bar Refaeli (BTW one time girlfriend of DiCaprio) who could have been cast as Barbie and who probably have some Slavic ancestry but not many.

    Replies: @BB753, @Bardon Kaldian, @AnotherDad, @Reg Cæsar, @Anonymous, @Hibernian

    …would this family attract attention on the streets of Naples?

    Yes. “Signore Cleese, may I have your autograph?”

    • LOL: jb
  • @SFG
    @Steve Sailer

    Perhaps when the other person is young the beauty module of our brains overrides the ethnic recognition module, particularly if they are of the opposite sex?

    Pretty sound evolutionary reasons for this…

    Replies: @jb, @anon

    I honestly can’t think of any good reason for our brains to have an ethnic recognition module. For most of human history people never ran into anyone who was all that different ethnically from themselves, and when they did it was not necessarily to their advantage to avoid mixing, so how would such a thing evolve? I’ve run into a lot of ideas like this — in particular from writers like Lance Welton and Edward Dutton on VDARE — that strike me as what you might call HBD Overreach. Not everything is about race and ethnicity.