RSSA lot of gays in Europe are beginning to realize that mass Muslim immigration is going to mean that they will get it in the neck sooner or later.
No Muslims are buying into the coalition of the oppressed – for e.g:
Their leaders see the benefit of an alliance with the Gayz.
Alongside this, apparently a feature of many Muslims’ experience at Hajj is going to McDonalds in Mecca, where the queues are enormous. So they’re being spiritually conquered by the lowest American garbage materialism, well at least some of them.
Very frequently, when an assertion begins with "Of course," one can expect that the assertion is dross, at best. Just so your above quoted assertion. Rather than clutter this thread with stuff I showed elsewhere in Unz Review, I shall cite some of my relevant comments posted under other Unz Review articles.
Of course, blacks kill far more whites than whites kill blacks, whether cops or anyone else. but this doesn’t fit the desired narrative.
AND
But the pillagers are overwhelmingly black. Expecting them to behave as if civilized would be racist, and intolerant, and cultural imperialism, and discrimination, and just like Hitler. So they hunt and gather at will, shrieking in ebonics and streaming from stores with bags of booty. It is the same in every riot. No, most blacks are not looters. Yes, many are horrified by it. Yes, blacks are human beings and have feelings like everybody else, etc. It remains that looting and burning are a black game.
The FACT is that, this time (the George Floyd murder protest time), most rioters have been White or of another non-Black ethnicity. And, quite as the political right has insisted, many have been Antifa or idiotic, sociopath or border-sociopath individuals of groups incited by Antifa.
Why always blacks? Depressingly, the most parsimonious explanation, consistent with all of the facts, is that blacks cannot function well in a modern society. They never have, anywhere, do not, and seem unlikely to. The underlying cause appears to be low average intelligence and, perhaps, poor impulse control. They interpret apparently inevitable failure as systemic racism. The very real fact of past mistreatment changes nothing. This will not improve because it cannot.
And my above-cited comments prove that either (a) Blacks are not genetically predisposed to commit violent crimes or property-thefts or (b) no one has been able to show, validly, reliably, that Blacks are so predisposed…
Your comments do not prove anything you pompous clown. They consist of you highlighting/speculating as to problems with statistics (stats being attempts to assert truths via empiricism). So your posts are attempts at disproving others’ assertions of fact, and in-depth versions of the “lies, damn lies and statistics”
The FACT is that, this time (the George Floyd murder protest time), most rioters have been White or of another non-Black ethnicity.
You spend your whole time trying to dismantle statistics that don’t fit your view, but then start asserting things as “FACT” without reference to any kind of proof. Absurd hypocrisy, I think a mark of deranged pomposity/narcissism.
I have viewed many photos and videos of scenes of the George Floyd protests and riots. The sources were of the left, middle, and right — American MSM (CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NY Times, Washington Post......), Fox News, right-wing rags (e.g., Washington Times), RT, Breitbart, Sputnick, AlJezeera, World Socialist Website......). Some photos or videos showed Blacks more than others. But a notable majority showed non-Blacks more than Blacks.But available reliable information is relatively spare (compared with, say, 1960s and early 1970s newsreels of scenes of the Vietnam war and of Vietnam war protests occurring in the U.S.). The available George Floyd protest information does not form a valid premise of determining quite accurately the frequency-distribution of Black rioters or “liberal” or “progressive” White rioters or Alt right rioters......Trump & other politicians insist Antifa thugs have incited & committed many of the riots’ crimes. “Liberal” politicians & “liberal” media have asserted that the criminal rioters & their instigators are Alt Right or neo-Nazi.I KNOW only this: Like the rest of Oregon, Portland Oregon & my Portland-suburb city, Beaverton Oregon, have markedly few Blacks. The demographics are similar in Idaho and Utah and many cities of the Great Plains states and in much of the Southwest.In Portland, George Floyd riots occurred daily for more than a week. I & others here SEE that the rioters are overwhelmingly White — and of great number. Portland & all Western Oregon is predominately “liberal” or “progressive.” In Oregon, Antifa has fomented & participated in riots of the rather recent past. The visual evidence is beyond compelling. One can SEE apparent Antifa (wearing typical Antifa garb) participating in the current (George Floyd) Portland riot. One can see rather few Blacks.
The FACT is that, this time (the George Floyd murder protest time), most rioters have been White or of another non-Black ethnicity.
No. Your bigot's or ne-Nazi mind needs to believe, irrespective of truth, that I pick statistics that fit my view. ZERO legitimate statistics or data support your bigot-mind's racist beliefs. [See below.]I do NOT pick statistics because they "fit [my] view." I present statistics that led me to my determination ["my view"].For the assertion that Blacks commit violent crimes more than non-Blacks do, Unz Review authors have relied upon sources like Homicide Trends in the United States, 1980-2008, and Annual Rates for 2009 and 2010, in Patterns & Trends, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics [hereinafter “DOJ Homicide Stats”], https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf
You spend your whole time trying to dismantle statistics that don’t fit your view, but then start asserting things as “FACT” without reference to any kind of proof.
That paragraph begins my above-referenced comment’s pertinent to the flaws of DOJ Homicide Stats (supra).
IMPORTANT NOTE: BELOW THIS COMMENT WILL REFERENCE CERTAIN OTHERS OF MY COMMENTS. THIS COMMENT WILL CITE THOSE OTHER COMMENTS BY DATE, TIME, AND COMMENT NUMBER. ALL THOSE OTHER COMMENTS APPEAR UNDER RON UNZ’S ARTICLE “RACE AND CRIME IN AMERICA,” UNZ REVIEW (20 July 2013), https://www.unz.com/runz/race-and-crime-in-america/
PLEASE SEE https://www.unz.com/runz/race-and-crime-in-america/ TO READ THOSE OTHERS OF MY COMMENTS.
It’s clear that it doesn’t matter whether the crisis is real or not, what matters is an ethnic group’s creation of a ontological framework which facilitates its position as the enforcer of moral rules, and then its ability to accuse other groups of moral failings with respect to these moral rules, and to apply psychological pressure via its constant accusations through the media it owns (i.e. the Jew media). This is white people’s position as pathetic subjects and devotees of the Holocaustianity religion.
ut it’s not the police who need reform. It’s the media.
Totally correct. If we manage to create a society in the future, there must be a strict quota of 0% for Jews in the media.
The Saker is at his worst when Amerisplaining domestic American politics. I’m rooting for the Empire to get wrecked by all of this along with him but there are a dozen better sources for American political analysis here.
If I ever need post-racial Duginist Ortho-Islamic-identitarian analysis on America for some reason, I’ll check back in.
These riots ares about Jews slowly losing control of their racial Janissaries.
Racial separation is the only long-term answer for civilization & Whites. Jews’ long-term answer is going to be cancelling Blacks in favor of Browns & keeping the focus on h8ing Whitey. Those are the battle-lines.
Apartheid > Togethercide, and neither YHWH or Allah can change that.
Classic.
post-racial Duginist Ortho-Islamic-identitarian analysis on America
Fresh.
Apartheid > Togethercide, and neither YHWH or Allah can change that.
That's pretty good.
Apartheid > Togethercide, and neither YHWH or Allah can change that.
Given that whitevil is by far the most, "mirror, mirror, who is the evilest of them all!," the darkest role-model for other race despots to ape, I would say the order of precedence should be;WhiteySelfGenocide > Apartheid > TogethercideMind you, as a lover of innocents, I prefer population thinning the natural way... something along these lines;https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/10/sperm-counts-continue-to-fall/572794/I also think this peaceful thinning of the herd will help those unborn, non-existent souls, who will anyway be headed for Hell, if they are born in the pagan-godless west.
Apartheid > Togethercide
I disagree, the powerful elements in the system of US society are not collapsing, they are consolidating their grip using racial grievances to totally demoralize the white citizenry, and fake story-telling about viruses to further their control of societal wealth and to increase their own confidence.
So the European morons rose up in solidarity with their oppressed brothers in the US. No wonder the western civilization is on the verge of collapse. It’s full of morons. Totally clueless and the only remaining instinct that they have (unfortunately it’s not a survival instinct) is to follow the US in everything that they do. Because if it’s done in the US – it must be the right thing to do. How were they able to produce more than 2k worth of civilization based on imbecility like that is beyond me. By all means, keep following the US – look how well it’s working for them, how can you go wrong following such a lead?
These were protests in European capital cities by blind adherents and loyalists of the US Empire and its religion, as well as by blacks. Most normal white British and Europeans do not support these stupid protests, I think that’s very clear,
Great post. I’d add some points to yours if I may.
– People need effective organisations which represent their particular class interests so that they can assert themselves. It is not effective to riot as a disorganised mob with no weapons.
– The globalist Jewish media focus on supposed Karen-related racial injustices within a society, because this furthers globalists’ and corporations’ objective of delegitimising the State. It is impossible to reconcile different races of people’s interests.
– The question is, which types of organisations do Cook and other mad leftist idiots think can replace the State as organisations through which peoples (e.g. ethnic groupings or class groupings) can organise and assert their collective interests against globalist corporations?
– There seems to be a completely naive romanticism in the power of the angry mob which flows through this article, and a demented belief that the globalist establishment actually opposes some low IQ disparate, disorganised black rioters and their cause, and is afraid of them. Which is clearly TOTALLY false.
BLM and antifa are Jewish-funded organizations whose narrative is driven 24/7 by Jewish-controlled media.
Ultimately, the anti-Christ will be defeated.
But in the meantime it’s going to be a wild ride.
Strap in, kids.
The Jews need their Anglo Puritan allies/servants. The Puritans were a jew-worship cult, and they were middle-class urban types who used pretence to higher morality to promote and entrench their class interests. These white protesters and idiots are the same class of people, using the same strategy just using the Holocaustianity ideological framework rather than the Puritanical Christian framework. These Anglo neo-Puritans need to be attacked also.
On the bright side, the protests in Europe seem even more manufactured/artificial than in the US and they have been almost wholly peaceful, it seems. Not many blacks to be seen, and I guess Muslims don’t care about blacks either.
No in the UK gangs of blacks attacked journalists. Two different Australian reporters were attacked live on air, and a third reporter was hospitalised. They also physically attacked police. What’s so worrying is that there is no mainstream media that puts normal people’s point-of-view on these stupid black riots, the Daily Mail has been close to sympathetic, and the Daily Telegraph had a piece saying that John Boyega (who joined the London protest) was “brave” for doing so. It’s so depressing and disgusting.
When will the evil American Empire crash. Empires often drag on for centuries.
This one has been draging on for many decades...but probably not much longer.
When will the evil American Empire crash. Empires often drag on for centuries.
By the standards of empires the US version, though appropriately ruthless and evil, has been brief and it now seems to be crashing out at high speed. Clearly Trump has helped this process along, but whether he is aware of the useful role he has played, is another matter.
Empires often drag on for centuries.
Is there any actual evidence that “far-right” people or “white supremacists” are involved in these riots? Newly appointed Senate Intel Chairman Marco Rubio says, “Terror groups on BOTH far left and right are instigating, committing acts of violence and looting.”
.
Of course not, this is a blatant American Bolshevik State narrative/reflex. The State religion is that Whites are the source of all problems, and this is the filter through which all phenomena are rationalised.
“America is a racist country”
Compared to where? Brazil? Rwanda? Bhutan? This kind of insane, brain-dead rhetoric should be banned. Actually any kind of language which is constructed around the idea that society can progress to a future in which there is no “racism” must be banned completely.
Lions” and “house cats” are different species – i.e. they cannot interbreed.
Nah, these are just social constructions, man.
There is a very clear-cut empirical definition of what it means to be a species for higher-order mammals. Black people belong to the same species as white people, even using your empirical scientific approach to categorizing people. The unspoken insinuation of your post, however, is that “blacks” are somehow not of the same species as “whites,” which is pretty despicable if you ask me. If you wanna get more autistic, the species concept breaks down and becomes less clear-cut for lower-order organisms (prokaryotes or even single-celled eukaryotes). So even in the realm of biology, which presumably for you represents some kind of domain of empirical knowledge where categories are clear-cut, is subject to some degree of arbitrary philosophical constructionism.
Down with your empiricism, we’re all like sociologically constructed and stuff. Where a shark preys on a human it’s just because the shark isn’t being inclusive enough yeah? to go by your categorisation scheme, where a pride of lions doesn’t share its catch with neighboring leopards, it’s just because they don’t recognize diversity and stuff, because they can interbreed with leopards. That’s just stupid! They’re just being racist because the leopards would share with them, why don’t they realize that? We need to break down these categories in lions’ and leopards’ minds man. Same with blacks, they have to realise they aren’t black and every other human just sees them as like a Chinese person or a Chilean European! Blacks’ idea that Chinese people see them as different when they go to China, it’s just socially constructed, yeah. So if 5 million Chinese people suddenly moved to Benin, any potentially-supplantable black Beninese tribe shouldn’t worry about that at all because the new “yellow” people would never act in concert to favor themselves at the expense of whichever black tribe, the two races wouldn’t notice any difference in each other man.
The first group to abolish its borders under any globalist open borders scheme is at such a huge advantage because you newcomers are just bound to come in and won’t take their territory and resources at all. Crapitalism can provide for us for eternity and we can all exist as disparate individuals Comrade Kapital!
The proof that you are of the same species as other races is that someday your grand-children are going to be black or brown. Better get used to it.
Ah the agenda. Of course. Sadly for you, you hateful, genocidal freak – we white European people have been on earth for thousands of years, and we have brought untold progress for humanity, about 1000 times that of dimwit blacks. And we will continue and there’s nothing you can do about it. Sorry about that, you genocidal Hater and black Supremacist freak.
Prof. Eidelberg believes that all nations and ethnic groups are "invented" and are the creations of the fallible will of men, except the "Chosen People". Eidelberg's logic is that Judaism is the only religion which was founded as both a faith and a nation (Israel); it is because of this supposedly superior brainchilld that the non-Jews of the earth "hate the Jewish people".
Rubin Rubin Rubin
You will say, my view is determined by the fact, that I am a revengeful German, but I don’t think this is the case, since I have some problems with my nation as well.
What problems?
I also reject the notion that they have “their own nations.” There is no “nation” – the so-called “nation,” much like the so-called “race,” is just a construct. Ergo, there are only people, no “immigrants.” If bringing in more “immigrants” ultimately helps to deconstruct the mythical idea of the “nation” with its “borders,” then yes, we need to bring in as many as possible.
How does it feel to get owned?
There is no such thing as a lion, as to differentiate it from a house cat. There are just “felines” – and actually even the idea of “feline” is a construction within the category “mammal”, and then that is even a construction within the category “animal”, and even that is a construction within the category “being”, and even that is a construct within the category “thing”, and even that is a construct within the “matter”, and so on. It’s just like language and stuff.
Please do remember this if you ever encounter a lion or a serpent within a wild setting, because the idea that a lion, a hungry and desperate bear, or serpent might automatically conceive of you as being something foreign to it, and potentially something that it can prey upon or that it might be in competition with, or that might harm it, is actually just you giving into your fear, man. We’re all like social constructions and stuff, there is no such thing as a serpent or a lion or a bear. Yeah?
You are literally delusional. I am a white male and no black man has ever challenged me for anything, many black men have worked for me. If black men are taking your jobs or women it is because you are a loser. Face it, blacks enjoy no real status at all. They are entertainers and minstrels. As a group they have almost no capital, they have very little political power, and every black woman is painfully aware that almost all of us, white, black, Asian, or indigenous, find most black women pretty unattractive.
Yes, we throw blacks some perks to try to keep them quiet. But fact is we started wide scale immigration at the same time the Civil Rights movement started. The goal of immigration was to dilute black political power and provide business owners with trainable obedient employees. To that extent immigration has worked like a charm. Problem is it has left us with a large underclass of uneducated angry men and women who are smart enough to realize they have no real role to play in our society, but aren’t smart enough to design an alternative. This problem is going to get worse as offshoring and automation sends more and more white people to join them, and soon they will be battling for scraps.
As a race in our understanding of race in our society (‘black’, ‘white’, ‘Asian’, etc), the black race *obviously* enjoys higher status than the white gentile race. In terms of any single black individual’s ability to advocate for his/her race, any single black obviously enjoy far greater ability to do that any single white gentile has.
In terms of individual success, there are clearly many black individuals who enjoy far greater status as compared to whites.
In terms of the society being structured so that it reflects the natural strengths/proclivities of the black race, it is debatable the extent to which this occurs, clearly there are openings for them in entertainment/music/sports. However it is an injustice that the cultures of white countries should be structured to the needs of blacks, completely injust. In the same way as it would be unjust and perverse to Igbo people if Igbo culture was structured to favor a white minority that lived in their territory.
The issue is what new events are being selected to be highlighted by who (e.g. the MSM particularly selecting events which depict black people’s victimisation by whites, given that there are many events which are examples of the reverse that they COULD select) – and then, given that these editors’ are making deliberate choices, what is their purpose in continually choosing to highlight blacks’ victimisation by whites (given that there are many many incidents which are occurring at any moment in time in which blacks are/have recently victimised whites).
The MSM isn’t motivated by a desire to critique the way in enforcement of the law (inevitably) involves expression of racial bias, as they also highlight nonsense incidents involving “Karens”.
Blacks are dying on the streets left and right, and the Trump administration, riddled with White supremacists and Nazis, just lets it happen and still engages in hate-mongering anti-immigrant rhetoric to distract people from the domestic oppression of blacks. What has this country come to?
Give this man a medal for the most baby-boomer/CNN-style take in history. So tedious and stupid.
So yes, how dare US blacks behave so badly. Why can’t they behave as well as the beaten-down underclass in the rest of the world when they have no jobs and no hope?
The idea that blacks are a beaten-down underclass is just so ridiculous, these people have high caste status – much higher than whites – and this has been the case for the last 60 years. They are officially discriminated for over whites in all areas of life by the US establishment, in terms of race. You are just talking absolute garbage.
This idea was conceived by Dominic Raab who’s Foreign Secretary. Guess which ethnic group he belongs to, yawn same every time.
Its just an open question if White men are going to be made serfs. We may not even get that.
There’s such a genocidey vibe in the American MSM at the moment, Jew Hate is in the air.
The media in the UK are disliked and distrusted as much as they are in the US.
I read both. I don’t mean this as an insult just an observation – the US MSM is a lot more obnoxious and disgusting than the British MSM. The US’s divide-and-rule, anti-White agenda is just deranged, whereas the British media’s Jew agenda is a little less in-your-face.
When things are looking really desperate, Americans always blame “the limeys” for their problems as a last ditch attempt to direct the blame away from their own country for the huge racial problems there.
Absolute nonsense
Seems like the MSM/tribe have taken energy from the ‘lockdown’, the assault on American Whites has been particularly concerted during the last few weeks. Like a final push. The normie American whites just don’t seem to realise that they’re being attacked, very Dodo-like.
There seem to be large number of white protesters there. I don’t understand how any White American can be subjected to the American MSM and fail to recognise extremely strong ethnic animus towards their (our) ethnic group.
I’m sure that there are a larger proportion of white Americans who are members of the Political Correctness suicide cult as compared to white Europeans.
Your loss. This article contains profound insights and offers serious humans illumination for the way forward.
I have a case in federal district court against the premiere “hate fighters” in the United States, the Southern Poverty Law Center. In the documents I have filed, I make a variation of one of the author’s arguments above, that hate, being an emotion, is neither good nor evil. It simply is. The only thing we can ask of an emotion is whether it is rational or irrational. When hate is rational, it provides the necessary emotive force for taking action.
Thank you for referencing William Strunk’s concise and pithy, ‘Elements of Style’. It was required reading when I attended journalism school some decades ago.
The author of this interesting but pretentiously-written essay would do well to read this enduring instruction manual on how to write clearly and communicate effectively. The prose above (by Intelligent Dasein) is so dense and overblown that I’ve given up reading it (at least for now).
Very true
When John Mann fell out with Jewish MP Denis MacShane (real name Matyjaszek)
That’s Denis MacShane who said that Nu Labour’s greatest achievement was taking Britain and turning it into a multi-racial country within 13 years. I don’t have the exact quote to hand, but it was basically that. I didn’t realise he was Jewish. He’s particularly obnoxious, hypocritical, anti-British and a proven cheat and fraud, so it makes sense now.
Those who have deep faith in the Germanic version of genetic determinism have great trouble fathoming that people do change in actions and attitudes when they change cultures. The Germanic genetic determinism that operates, and has since at least the late 18th century, sees Germanic traits as something pure, like a virgin northern forest. So when those people see a guy spouting clearly pro-Semitic nonsense, they assume he must be a Jew.
Would you be able to say the basis for the highlighted? Only ask, as I’d had a vague understanding that genetic determinist ideas where encouraged/incited by Darwin’s work, so would be later than what you say.
Broadly agree with the rest of your post although I don’t see Catholicism as the answer and I wouldn’t cast all Protestant denominations as being as useless as Puritans/Evangelicals. Also, regards your theory, Anglicanism is often described as a sort of compromise between Catholicism and Protestantism, designed to appease both sides. Puritans were often marginalised and moved out to New England.
Obviously the British Anglo Elite were extremely philo-Semitic from the late 1600s onwards, despite being Anglican (rather than Puritan) for most of that period. But – my understanding is that the English elite always had a strong sense that Jews were “other”. They didn’t form or promote ideologies which cast Jews as the highest in the hierarchy, like American WASPs do with their Christian Zionism and Political Correctness drivel.
Trying to say that it’s arguable that the English/British elite kept the Jew more at an arm’s length and didn’t place them on such a high pedestal a the American Anglo elite has done since the 1950s (when the Americans basically took over the Empire).
Sections 3,1,b,ii, and 3,2,b,ii, and 5,1,b,iii state “it is likely that, as a result of these actions/publications, hate will be stirred up against the group”.. It’s subtle, and not yet ‘if that group feels that you hate them, you commit a crime’, but it seems very close to giving the power to decide if hatred was stirred up, to the minds of the offended party.
To the point that the possession of literature (bookmarked Unz articles?!), that could incite hatred in others, is enough for conviction.
If the defendant pleads that they weren’t stirring up hatred, but the complainant claims they felt hated, who is going to be believed these days?
Seems the law is being stood upside down on its head.
I don’t think the issue is that these laws prosecute according to certain groups of people’s subjective senses of victimhood. Rather they basically outlaw any criticism of the sacred minority groups.
Clearly, if one criticises a group of people’s behaviour, people who listen to that criticism are likely to feel hatred towards the group whose behaviour has been cast as anti-social or immoral.
Therefore, under these laws, it is illegal to criticise the sacred groups – even if that criticism is accurate, and even where the group in question is developing cultural practices which are anti-social etc.
I mean to say – it isn’t the case that material that discusses sacred groups will be held to be illegal where a sacred minority feels that that material was motivated by animus. Rather, it will be illegal where the court ascertains that it was in any way critical of a sacred minority group, and as such is likely to invoke the emotion of ‘hatred’ or animus towards the group-under-discussion in the mind of the Gentile White reader.
Whether the criticism is reasonable or justifiable doesn’t come into it.
The adviser, Lord Mann, who like Carr is of course Jewish, has now insisted to Starmer that the use of words like ‘’Zionist’’ or ‘’Zionism’’ in a critical context must be regarded as anti-Semitism if Starmer wants to establish what he refers to as “comprehensive anti-racism” within the Labour Party.
He isn’t Jewish apparently – https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2018/02/antisemitic-abuse-labour-jewish-social-media. He certainly doesn’t come across like a Jew, more like a typical working-class northerner.
He seems quite low-IQ, so I’d assumed that he’d gravitated to the “anti-Semitism” issue as a means of displaying his loyalty to those above him in the hierarchy. Completely disloyal to his people, and totally out for himself.
Governments should be thinking about how they can assert the interests of their electorates, so that they can force these companies to show information in a way which is consistent with discovery of the truth, free of the corruption of e.g. Google’s commercial and corporate self-interest.
But instead they are basically inventing legal frameworks through which they can sort-of collude with Jewgul and Jewbook to build the Empire and keep the White Proletariat Deplorable Scum in line. That’s what the UK government legislation on this subject will facilitate.
I recently watched an interview with the coach of the Fijian Rugby 7s. Fiji are the best at rugby 7s in the world, I think they’d be the same racial/ethnic type as Samoans basically, but perhaps bigger? Anyway apparently when Fijian rugby players are operated on, surgeons say their tendons and ligaments are much thicker than whites and also blacks. Also, most Fijians eat a huge amount of sugar, and are addicted to it – but perhaps the same isn’t true for Samoa.
Not bigger -- faster.
Fiji are the best at rugby 7s in the world, I think they’d be the same racial/ethnic type as Samoans basically, but perhaps bigger?
Australia’s low mortality rate would seem to undermine the theory that quiet talkers (like Austrians, Finns, Japanese, etc.) are less likely to spread the virus than excitable loud talkers (Italians, French, African-Americans, etc.) Few peoples on the planet are louder than Australians.
I am not sure to which "Protestant Christian theology" you refer. Puritans believed that all humans were inherently bad, while Quakers believed all humans were inherently good. The Lutheran catechism that I learned before the great split about 60 years ago certainly didn't assume self interest was corruption, which is what you seem to suggest. There is such a thing as human frailty, whether physical or spiritual. I can't speak for all Protestant denominations, but my understanding was that the spiritual frailty was yielding to the temptation of a sinful act. Anything beyond that is Jimmy Carter`s `lust in my heart`. Certainly nothing to be proud of, but not a sin, and not corruption by self interest.Replies: @fatmanscoop
Such accusations seem alien to the Protestant Christian theology, which assumes that every single human is corrupted by self-interest,...
The Lutheran catechism that I learned before the great split about 60 years ago certainly didn’t assume self interest was corruption, which is what you seem to suggest. There is such a thing as human frailty, whether physical or spiritual. I can’t speak for all Protestant denominations, but my understanding was that the spiritual frailty was yielding to the temptation of a sinful act. Anything beyond that is Jimmy Carter`s `lust in my heart`. Certainly nothing to be proud of, but not a sin, and not corruption by self interest.
Maybe I spoke too soon. I’m only familiar with the Anglican(Episcopalian) interpretation. I know some argue that Anglicanism isn’t really Protestantism. My understanding was that Original Sin can be conceived of as man’s selfish self-interest – as opposed to moral law which might require abnegation of selfish impulse for the betterment of the whole (what is Holy).
My understanding is that Lutherans have the same basic conception – that “every human thought and deed is infected with sin and sinful motives” (i.e. that humans are totally corrupted by self-interest and sinful selfish desires), and that this is something we’re all born into and saddled with, save for the Grace of God. I believe that Calvinists preach the same ideological structure regards Original Sin also. I think it’s a very good moral system.
Reading this article – more evil taunting and humiliation propaganda from a Tribe member. It’s so disgusting, the American MSM is strongly geared towards humiliating whites.
Do you read scientific articles? I know you are not a medical doctor or a scientist so no point asking about your actual experience in dealing with the virus, but you can read. Many informed and intelligent people have formed their opinion of this epidemics by reading the reported scientific evidence, experiments, epidemiological modelling, not the media. I have posted several articles published in top-ranking journals demonstrating the effectiveness of containment in China (recently a new work has been published with an analysis of the dynamics in Germany). These articles also offer the data and computer code freely to reproduce the results or adapt them to other situations.I don't know where you live and I am sorry that you are experiencing the fascist apocalypse (obwandiyag, above) while sitting at your desk typing out your pieces. Where I live in Europe there was a serious epidemics that is now getting under control thanks to the strategy of containment. There has been no fascist uprising and there have been no politicians suddenly sig-heiling people into the totalitarian nightmare that you describe. We are all tired of this shit but as I can see around me nearly all agree that the infections have to be contained and that the effort to achieve containment has been worth the pain. I guess to stop pathogens that kill or cause great suffering to people from spreading further is a humanitarian demand, regardless of the age or health of the victims.Also, contrary to the nightmarish situation you describe in your country, here politicians seem to be too eager to come back to their normal routine. They are not looking to perpetuate a state of emergency, quite on the contrary, scientific committes are advising them to carry on a bit further (with many postdocs doing to modelling in the background) and de-escalate in a gradual manner.But what you describe is truly nightmarish. I see you quote a lot of twitter posts and other media to susbtantiate your fears. So either you go out and fight the fascists hordes sig-hailing you into totalitarianism from twitter, or instead you read scientific papers and calm down.Replies: @Tsar Nicholas, @The Kremlin Stooge, @Marshall Lentini, @obwandiyag, @JSlade, @Parfois1, @Yusef, @Hail
My intent is not merely to mock these people (i.e., these “radical,” “anti-establishment” types who fell into formation and started goose-stepping because the media told them we were all going to die), but also to use them as a clear example of how official narratives are born and take hold.
I live in Europe there was a serious epidemics that is now getting under control thanks to the strategy of containment. There has been no fascist uprising and there have been no politicians suddenly sig-heiling people into the totalitarian nightmare that you describe.
Well, in Britain (which is still part of Europe geographically) all protests, demonstrations and the like have been banned. Local elections have been delayed by one year.
The virus has been circulating since November and the excess mortality rate over and above the background rate did not start until after the lockdown commended in March. Part of this is due to the cancellation of elective surgery for at least three months – no transplants, much reduced diagnoses of new cancer cases, people with heart attacks and stroke staying away from hospitals and so on.
There has been a veritable holocaust in care homes – caused by lack of visits from GPs and a lack of availability of hospital care, and the rush to empty hospitals of older people back to care homes regardless of whether or not they had the infection. Care homes were by (emergency) law not permitted to refuse entry.
Every Thursday we are encouraged to spend several minutes of our house arrest going outdoors and clapping for the National Health Service. It’s a bit like a love version of the Two Minutes of Hate in Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Well done on getting your articles published. That boast does little for the reputation of these “top ranking publications.”
Remember our boys bravely fighting on the Malabar Front!
Every Thursday we are encouraged to spend several minutes of our house arrest going outdoors and clapping for the National Health Service. It’s a bit like a love version of the Two Minutes of Hate in Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Thank you for another wonderful article Mr. Hopkins.
You are a voice of reason in a world gone mad.
Asshole douchbag. I wonder who pays him to write this phony-baloney lying old-switcheroo shit.
And get this. He used to mock people who thought the fascist apocalypse is coming.
Now he thinks the fascist apocalypse is coming.
This is a very common psychological problem. It’s like when a woman says she’s never ever going to, uh, kiss someone and then kisses them. Very similar. The object stays the same but the subject reverses.
I’ll tell you what. “Opening up” is when we go back to real fascism.
with the result that their women have them pussy-whipped and under the thumb.
Apparently Swedish women have had a comparatively elevated position in Swedish society/culture (as compared to gender relations in other countries) for a long time.
Good post, but Varadkar seems a treasonous Zionist pawn also
Well…just stepping back and taking a big picture view of this whole brouhaha surrounding that UNSC vote criticizing the ILLEGAL Israeli settlements in occupied territory…
What is remarkable is just how timidly even Obama handled this incredibly mild rebuke…
He waited until his time in the Ovaltine Office was nearly done to even approve of this milquetoast diplomatic slap on the wrist of Israel’s criminal occupation conduct…[absolutely criminal by every international law on the books…]
With just days to go before heading off to pasture, Obama finally screwed together the gonads to actually ABSTAIN from a UN vote against Israel…
This is just abject fear of some massive bogeyman that apparently everyone in Washington is frightened to death of…
This episode really tells quite a story…it is really a snapshot of the entire problem of Jewish control of American policy…it really has become unbelievable…
What’s very astonishing is that in the USA anti-white nationalism is mainstream : the idea that public policies have as a result – or as a goal – hurting – or even killing – non whites and that those policies emanate from whites.
It’s the underlying assumption in every legit place : NYT, WaPo, The Atlantic, NewYorker and Universities. On MSNBC Joy Reid, with WaPo Dionne, present one of the most radical form of non-white nationalism, with loads of conspiracies.
On the opposite side, white nationalism wich is exactly the same only reverting white and non-white predicates, is considered hate crime, and even almost terrorism.
White nationalism should be able to ask for equality and compare its argument to mainstream non-white nationalism by reviewing their respective arguments .
I don’t think the Political Correctness cultists would cede to that argument, somehow.
The lockdown was inevitable. There are scientific reasons for that and historical practices which confirm it.
The lockdown was necessary because we needed time to get material to protect against the virus like masks. We had to prepare supermarkets and shops to minimize contact between people. We had to learn how to treat sick people in hospitals and to prepare hospitals logistically to deal with those cases. We had to establish practices of social distancing and to find solutions to cases where this isn’t possible or desirable. We had to reduce the spread of the virus and diminish the number of infections in order that the situation doesn’t get completely out of control.
Lockdown wasn’t invented by Fauci or by Gates. I think that Europe begun earlier with such measures and didn’t need any advice from them. There are thousends of such experts in Europe and generally they support a lockdown. Some countries where this was apparently well done like Portugal have few deaths. New Zealand seems to have almost eliminated the disease.
Of course, nobody denies that life has been disrupted, that there are serious economic difficulties and that we don’t know if we will suceed. But I don’t think that this could have been avoided if we had had no lockdown.
You just said that the we couldn't have avoided economic difficulties brought on by lockdowns if there had been no lockdowns.
But I don’t think that this could have been avoided if we had had no lockdown.
And you think viruses wait for humans to get their shit together before spreading, right? Seriously - has anyone addressed this inconsistency in pro-lockdown dogma, that everyone seems to believe that measures taken weeks or even months after initial outbreak can stop "the spread"? Imagine the difficulty encountered by the men who pioneered microbiology and the germ theory of disease. It's amazing that back then, the weight of human stupidity would have been against invisible creatures that cause illness; now the weight is on the other side, totally overestimating just one of an existing class of virus - and yet fundamentally misunderstanding how viral transmission works, of course. Magical thinking can attach itself to any concept, even a "scientific" one. Well, this has all taught me, or rather reinforced in the most annoying way possible, a couple valuable lessons:1- One can always count on a majority of the populace to side with their oppressors
The lockdown was necessary because we needed time to get material to protect against the virus like masks.
Donald Trump calls the media “the enemy of the people”, but it’s much worse than that. The media is a national security threat. Just look at the way they’ve handled the coronavirus.
This is an understatement – and the MSM should take a good proportion of the blame since the pressure for ‘lockdown’ etc comes from them. The American MSM is just totally disgusting and must be reformed. I don’t live in the USA, I don’t understand how white Americans can tolerate their MSM. Constant racial/ethnic aggression, constant attempts to humiliate the white ethnicity – really just intense hostility packaged in an extremely low IQ kind of way. Even from afar, it’s unbearable. It’s like the BBC but on steroids.
We will get separate but unequal soon. Just with Whites as the subservient and limited rights people. To be White today will be being Black in Alabama in 1920.
Almost right, Whisk’. It’ll actually be more like LAST KING OF SCOTLAND . Whites will be the managerial experts whose advise will be cast off with insult, probably with such schoolyard -level invention as dog barks to drown out all that fact and logic (cf. BLACK PANTHER), and then when reality hits the conversation will go something like this:“Why didn’t you tell me to social distance and wash my hands and not make rap videos with 100 twerking hoochie-mamas packed into a single hot tub?”“But I did tell you!”“Ah, but you did not persuade me, Whitey McWhitePractitioner, you did not persuade me.”
We will get separate but unequal soon. Just with Whites as the subservient and limited rights people. To be White today will be being Black in Alabama in 1920.
Give her a break guys, she has a long history of being tired.
https://www.heyalma.com/as-a-black-jew-the-ilhan-omar-controversy-is-incredibly-exhausting/
I remember reading about David Horowitz, who is a leftist Marxist who became a NeoCon Zionist (“right-winger”). I guess that is quite a standard path. Anyway, his right-wing commentariat peers complained about him because he apparently “uses the debating tactics of the New Left” – i.e. constant accusations of impure motivation on the part of his interlocutor (e.g. “anti-Semite”, “racist”, “misogynist”), rather than actually attempting to get to the heart of the matter in question. Is that a characteristic of Talmudic pilpul argument? Such accusations seem alien to the Protestant Christian theology, which assumes that every single human is corrupted by self-interest, as a basis (meaning that it is less easy for any single person to accuse another of impurity in terms of undue selfishness/motivation).
I am not sure to which "Protestant Christian theology" you refer. Puritans believed that all humans were inherently bad, while Quakers believed all humans were inherently good. The Lutheran catechism that I learned before the great split about 60 years ago certainly didn't assume self interest was corruption, which is what you seem to suggest. There is such a thing as human frailty, whether physical or spiritual. I can't speak for all Protestant denominations, but my understanding was that the spiritual frailty was yielding to the temptation of a sinful act. Anything beyond that is Jimmy Carter`s `lust in my heart`. Certainly nothing to be proud of, but not a sin, and not corruption by self interest.Replies: @fatmanscoop
Such accusations seem alien to the Protestant Christian theology, which assumes that every single human is corrupted by self-interest,...
I wonder how much longer they’re going to be able to blame climate change on white supremacy–how much global pollution is produced by the Chinese at this point?
Industrial production and the internal combustion engine are inventions of the White Male Oppressor. These would not be in existence were it not for us, and so would not cause such harm to the Noble People of Color, – and to the natural world with which they live in such Beautiful Harmony – were it not for our putrid influence. The source of this evil is White Geneology I am afraid – as per all sin. The Evil White Male must acknowledge his Original Sin.
May Political Correctness Be Upon You, friend.
Blessed be the Noble People of Color. Indeed, they shall inherit the Earth, and they will jog in peace – free from molestation by Evil White Devils, with out Racism, our Hate and Our Vile Climate Assaults.
People of Color: marginalized,forgotten,passed over,ignored, left behind,their pleas unheard,shouted down,rejected abandoned, turned away,feared, loathed, used,abused ,discounted, locked out,hunted down,robbed,cheated, laughed at,mocked,exhausted…
They carry the pain of being…People of Color. Its a heavy burden,indeed.
Nova Scotia in particular got a substantial number of escaped slaves. Halifax long had the largest black population of any city in Canada, though Toronto and Montreal have far surpassed it.
Also many ‘Black Loyalists’ were transferred here – with many of these subsequently going on to found Sierra Leone (I read recently),
Thirty-five women scientists breathe a sigh of relief after hitting upon a woke excuse for throwing in the towel.
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier did exactly this in a move with dreamlike precision last week in his pubic speech in Berlin to remember the last day of WW II - he said, explicitly, that with regard to the German history (= Hitler), forgiveness can no longer exist. - Then as I said already, in a move of dreamlike precision, he goes on, that the rabbinical metaphor of the broken-heart will have to take the place of forgiveness, for all Germans - forever.
They have presented Judaism as morally superior to European civilization and European civilization as morally bankrupt and the proper target of altruistic punishment.
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier did exactly this in a move with dreamlike precision last week in his pubic speech in Berlin to remember the last day of WW II – he said, explicitly, that with regard to the German history (= Hitler), forgiveness can no longer exist. – Then as I said already, in a move of dreamlike precision, he goes on, that the rabbinical metaphor of the broken-heart will have to take the place of forgiveness, for all Germans – forever.
This is the liberal ‘Judeo-Christian’ religion – whites (or more specifically Germanic males) must exist in a permanent state of ethnic penance, to pay for their original sin.
“Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.”
Displays of power is all they are. To add the quote from Dalrymple:
“Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed.”
The longer I live, the more I think a hot war is inevitable. The values of coastal liberals are so different from those in the interior of this country that we can no longer be reconciled. We’re two different countries with a shared economy, and that’s all.
Given the Appalachians in the east, and the Rockies in the west, perhaps the continental territory might most naturally divide into a west-of-the-Rockies section, an east-of-the-Appalachians section, and then the middle bit in between (the Red States). The middle part would be a bit like the Louisiana Purchase section basically.
Who engages in white flight and gentrification?
It’s bad when white people leave the neighborhood and it’s bad when they come back again. White people are just bad, period.
https://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/right.gif
White people are just bad, period.
Frankly I’m starting to think that BadWhites might as well give up, adopt Swedish views of what is a proper society and accept the Supremacy of the liberal Managerial State because only after Liberals achieved total victory will they be willing to consider that there could be something wrong with their policies.
Their worldview is that white genes are the source of original sin. Where the liberal state’s policies fail to achieve utopia, they will perceive that whites genes are the problem factor. So your solution is just a route to genocide of some kind.
Agree with you Twinkie as a general point. Indians are at the bottom of the Asian pile in terms of out-marriage.
Seems a very different experience compared to Britain. Anecdotally, Indian Hindus seem quite likely to marry out, comparatively quick to assimilate (and have caucasian-type features so that this can happen quite easily). Indian Hindus here are often anti- further immigration I think. Compare this to Pakistani/Bangladeshi Muslims, where assimilation is much less possible and inter-marriage is very rare, and who milk the “anti-racism” religion for invasion purposes.
Alternatively it could be that Hindus just go under the radar here, as right-wingers are much more likely to focus on Muslims, blacks and Jews.
Indians in the UK tend to be from high castes, especially those who came after getting chucked out of Uganda.
Indian Hindus here are often anti- further immigration I think. Compare this to Pakistani/Bangladeshi Muslims, where assimilation is much less possible and inter-marriage is very rare, and who milk the “anti-racism” religion for invasion purposes.
Every time you think the press has finally hit bottom and cannot sink any lower, they prove you wrong.
She married at 49 and has no children. A talent for building abiding fruitful relationships with men is something she’s never had.
You have some good points, Mr. Bonomo, but the clock vs. orange contrast just got you off to a bad start. There’s no way to come back from that start – really, clocks and oranges? An apples to oranges comparison is bad enough. I understand you got this from a book, but there is even less chance of my reading said book now, compared to 10 minutes back, and I’m glad I got that movie from the library, for free, as it sucked.
That said, I also think that your lumping or labelling the Pro-Panic side as the intellectuals and/or scientists and the anti-Panic side as naturalists is not very accurate either. What I’ve found is that, due to computer power having increased to the point that memory and calculation time is almost a non-issue, otherwise intelligent science/math types think that the right equations crunched hard enough will give them good answers.
Without having attempted to model real things in the real world, as engineers to, they don’t understand that all the input data (initial conditions, boundary conditions, etc.) must be known very accurately, and EVERY SINGLE PHYSICAL PROCESS involved must be included, to have even a chance of getting good numbers out. This is where the Global Climate Disruption(TM) modelers go wrong, BTW.
Science has been applied by those on both sides of this issue, just as politics has been used by both sides. I lean heavily toward the side that says this is not the Black Plague, and therefore not nearly enough an emergency to allow Governors to have the powers they have exercised. I have been civilly disobedient on this, and it FEELS GOOD, MAN!
Denmark has 5 million people and is able to free ride on the rest of the EU and the US. Without the other major EU countries and the US, it would be German or Soviet colony.
It would be better to be a Soviet or German colony than what the US Empire recommends for European country, which is to become an Afghan/Congolese mix colony.
Denmark has a long history as an independent (as-its-possible-to-be) country and a great geographical location, so your comment is not right.
The journalist/academic class are always prattling on about the sacredness of “Democracy.”
But when you just barely scratch the surface, it turns out that, to them, “Democracy” is just their shorthand for a bundle of Soros-style global elite policies like open borders, wealth redistribution, “diversity” preferences for the usual groups, etc.
Their term is “liberal democracy”. In their view, the ‘liberal’ ideology is the guarantor of the truest democracy – therefore the people’s vote is only democratic in nature when it legitimises the ‘liberal’ ideology.
Whites are being defeated by their own cowardice this time, not overwhelming man- and fire-power. It’s a cowardice about being called names, which is pretty shameful.
The stories that white Americans are told about themselves and constantly repeat are significant surely. White Americans used to believe in ‘manifest destiny’, but now communally believe that their presence on the North American continent is totally illegitimate. I don’t see how any group can compete when they continually tell themselves they don’t deserve to even be in the competition.
Roth gives the impression that anyone who linked Jews and Communism was a raving Nazi anti-Semite,
I never get the impression from reading to Hitler’s writings and listening to his speeches that the Nazis were “raving” anti-Semites. Rather, they were just normal anti-Semites, quite level-headed. Mein Kampf is fairly tepid on Jewry and it reads as though Hitler has got bigger fish to fry and other preoccupations.
Mein Kampf is fairly tepid on Jewry
Very tepid after all, all statesmen talk like this.
Was there any excrement, any shamelessness in any form, above all in cultural life, in which at least one Jew would not have been involved? As soon as one even carefully cut into such an abscess, one found, like maggots in a decaying body, often blinded by the sudden light, a kike
Great article and much needed common sense. He’s the great philosopher of our time, that Mr. Anglin.
Great reply Andrew, but I’m not sure his piece was worth that much effort.
Even the shitty Bolshevik WHO agrees with you that Sweden did the right thing.
You got it right, along with Ramz, Ron Paul, Red Ice, and a host of legitimate scientists.
What exactly do you think they did?
Even the shitty Bolshevik WHO agrees with you that Sweden did the right thing.
The reality is that you'll get what you want. Because you guys lied about this and advocated doing nothing until it was too late, it can no longer be contained in this country. But don't pretend it isn't happening. Don't say "it's just the flu, bro" ... because it'll be the worst flu we've seen during our lifetimes. Obviously, hundreds of thousands will die now ... and all because you wanted to go out and play. Other countries disagreed and not so many will die:
All is Not What it Seems in Sweden
Contrary to impressions created in American media, the country's approach to the pandemic has not been so 'relaxed.'
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/all-is-not-what-it-seems-in-sweden/
Replies: @Robert Dolan, @ploni almoni, @DICARLO, @ld, @WJ, @Oldtradesman, @Wally, @Wally, @freedom-cat, @Epaminondas, @TRM
COVID-19 Projections Using Machine Learning
https://covid19-projections.com/
I think there had been a miscommunication. I am saying the americas will remain multiracial. And the only blood and soil ties that will form will be mutli-ethnic, multiracial. no one race in the Americas have an exclusive blood and soil claim.I have not said Japanese claims to territory are legitimate or illegitimate. You are putting up strawmen, you have not even specified the territory you talk of.my original post was to point out the ridiculousness of those who wish to claim only Euro Americans have exclusive claim to blood and soil tiesReplies: @Sunshine
I don’t see why brown people can’t be assimilated and the blakz live as a minority.
There would be no “America” for the third world parasites to leech off of, if white Europeans hadn’t settled it. The entire continent, essentially. Why on earth should we, the descendants of those settlers, be expected to meekly become “multiracial”? Is there a place in Europe for those of us who aren’t really “Amerimutts”? Some of us are still wholly Anglo, with zero non white admixture. Are we consigned to the diversity stew? I really don’t get this at all.
His biography.
Labour sent out ‘search parties’ for immigrants to get them to come to the UK, Lord Mandelson has admitted.
In a stunning confirmation that the Blair and Brown governments deliberately engineered mass immigration, the former Cabinet Minister and spin doctor said New Labour sought out foreign workers.
He also conceded that the influx of arrivals meant the party’s traditional supporters are now unable to find work.
From 1985 to 1991, Mandelson served as Labour's Director of Communications. He was one of the first to whom the term 'spin doctor' was applied and gained the nickname 'the Prince of Darkness' because of his 'ruthlessness' and 'media savvy'.[3] He served as Member of Parliament (MP) for Hartlepool from 1992 to 2004 and held a number of Cabinet positions under Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.[4
Mandelson was Labour's election campaign director for the 1997 general election, which Labour won decisively.
His family.
He was appointed as a Minister without Portfolio in the Cabinet Office, where his job was to co-ordinate within government. A few months later, he also acquired responsibility for the Millennium Dome
Replies: @fatmanscoop
His father's family were Jewish; his grandfather had founded the Harrow United Synagogue. His father (known as Tony) was the advertising manager of The Jewish Chronicle[
Don’t forget Jonathan Portes – the Nu Labour Jewish economist who miraculously managed to calculate that all inward migration and settlement results in amazing communal benefit, all of the time. Absolute Jew con-artist and very influential during Nu Labour years. Still gets quoted.
His ethnic background might surprise you.
Perec "Peter" Rachman (16 August 1919 – 29 November 1962) was a Polish-born landlord who operated in Notting Hill, London, England in the 1950s and early 1960s. He became notorious for his exploitation of his tenants, with the word "Rachmanism" entering the Oxford English Dictionary as a synonym for the exploitation and intimidation of tenants.
https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2019/12/23/the-real-meaning-of-rachmanism/
Rachman was born in Lwów, Poland, in 1919, the son of a Jewish dentist.[2
The BBC reported that in order to extract maximum profit from his houses, Rachman would not hesitate to “Put in the schwartzers”—as those in the real estate world commonly termed the practice of letting their properties to black people, so that rent-controlled white tenants would feel they had little choice but to leave, enabling the landlords to let out their flats at a higher rate. Panorama reported that, if this didn’t work, Rachman would pay Caribbean immigrant tenants to play deafening music at all times of the day and night. The BBC also reported claims that Rachman hired black hoodlums to intimidate white tenants, or, conversely, white hoodlums to harass black tenants; and if these tactics failed, Rachman would employ thugs with Alsatian dogs to wrench doors off their hinges, remove roof tiles, and rip up floor boards in order to terrify those he wished to evict.
A "saviour."
The newspaper accounts made it clear that Rachman not only rented to prostitutes, but also welcomed “coloured” tenants, thereby ruining neighborhoods. Between 1948 and 1962, some 250,000 West Indians arrived in Britain from the Caribbean, and the most pressing problem facing them was housing. The Trinidadian writer, Samuel Selvon, who settled in London in 1950, constructed an entire novel, The Housing Lark (1965), around this vexing issue. Until the Race Relations Act of 1965, it was perfectly legal for landlords to stipulate, both in person and in written advertisements, that “No Coloureds” were permitted as tenants. And even if these prospective tenants were willing and able to pay ludicrously high rents, many landlords still preferred not to rent to black people. Rachman, however, saw no reason to discriminate against the newcomers. In the late nineteen-fifties, shortly before the Empire News merged with its more popular Sunday competitor, the News of the World, Rachman gave an interview to the soon-to-be defunct newspaper.
“The government does nothing to house these West Indians when they come over here. Somebody must,” he said. “That’s why they come to me. I find coloured people good tenants… I take people as they come. Mind you, some white people do object to the coloured people when they move in. They don’t always like the way they play jazz records up to 1:00 AM and always loudly.”
“To the West Indian he was a saviour and people still have a lot of respect for him.”
Nursing care was virtually non-existent. The Doctor’s conclusion was that he had a bad reaction to his breakfast on the morning he first showed symptoms. They sent him home with a pat on the back.
Breakfast? Bacon, egg, and bagel sandwich. What he ate just about every morning he worked.
The culprit according to the Muslim Doctor who oversaw his care? Bacon.
He had a bad reaction to….bacon.
But at least the care was free.
Over here the signs say “Save The NHS” first and foremost. Save the NHS. These british weirdos are sick in the head when it comes to their “NHS”.
Can’t wait to leave.
Can’t wait to come home and spend over $575 on my organizations health-plan per month for quality healthcare in a clean and well sanitized space. Where, for at least the next couple of years, you can kind of sort of count on the Doctor being competent…
It’s always “our NHS”. There is a minority population of about 10% socialist fundamentalists, who will go berserk if the NHS is changed in any way, meaning we cannot follow superior models such as Germany has.
The NHS is a healthcare system where the incentive is to get rid of as many potential patients as possible at the pre-care/scanning stage. If you’re middle-class, white, young and polite, they will definitely try to cast you off as early as possible. So you have to be very persistent and understand that everyone in the outer rings of the system is trying to dismiss your complaint (irrespective of the severity of your symptoms). Sometimes then you can work your way into the inner-rings of the service, and get excellent healthcare and good doctors after about usually a year or 10 months of Soviet-style queuing, bureaucracy etc.
The British state Political Correctness caste system decrees that “BAME” people’s sensitivities (mental and physical) are more important than whites’ and must be pioritised over whites’. Number one rule, instructs all policy (quite literally, Ministers have to complete an “equality impact” statement certifying that they have taken into consideration and obeyed the tenets of this racial caste system).
It only strengthens Israel’s position in the public mind…as people naturally reject such ugliness and feel even more sympathetic to Israel…
Do you think someone who is secretly supporting the Israeli agenda would not figure that there is no chance whatsoever of their noises ever having any impact…?
The holocaust narrative is not going to be taken down, or even dented…that’s like shooting an air gun at an aircraft carrier…no damage can possibly be done…
The clever warrior wants you to attack his STRENGTH not his weakness…think about that…
Totally disagree with this. The Internet means that the Holy Story of the Holocaust has been very significantly undermined, so has the Political Correctness system of taboo. Jews know this, you can see from the likes of Baron Cohen’s speech at the ADL recently. There are now European countries and large political movements in every western nation which reject the Political Correctness cultural/ideological system. Anyone drawn to such movements will likely be emotionally open to rejecting the Spiritual Primacy of the Holy holocaust story. In fact you can see a real progression in people’s unadultered (ungoverned by social taboo) comments on the Holocaust on many mainstream sites such as Yahoo, etc.
The Internet is not easy to regulate or control.
Anyway, admitting defeat on the Holocaust Story is just tantamount to completely giving up, as the telos that flows from of that story is that the demonic Germanic white male should be cast out (genocided), and so believers operate towards that objective.
What I meant is that the USA is hardly even White culturally. Canada is still a White nation, both racially and culturally, as is Argentina, both of which maintain their cultural links to Europe. Canada has the British Monarch as its Head of State while Argentina produced the first Latino Pope in Roman Catholic history. Quebec City and Buenos Aires are two of the oldest European cities in the Americas. And they're very French and Spanish, respectively, thus making them very European and 100% White.
They say America is about 63% White in 2020, but have you seen what passes for White in the census reports or better yet go and look at some mugshots of mestizo perpetrators listed as “white.” I remember going through some mugshots of “rasslers” and the late Eddie Guerrero, a Hispanic/Mexican had his race listed as “white” on his mugshot. I saw some light skinned muds listed as “white” as well. I would bet the number of non Jew, non Arab, non East Indian, etc. TRUE EUROPEAN WHITES in America are probably hovering more at 53% than 63%.
That's what I find strange about the Anglo-Americans who are the founding people of the USA. They're anti-British and anti-Catholic even though both the British Monarchy and Roman Catholicism are White Western European Institutions which form a major part of Western Civilization. Instead, the USA have turned into the United States of ZionistNegroLGBTQ$PLC, a veritable cesspool of every Globo-Homo vice known to man.Replies: @Aedib, @Trinity, @fatmanscoop
As far as the RIDICULOUS “AngloZionist” angle, I stated earlier that this is as ridiculous as the title Judeo Christian label or Judeo Christian values bullshit. Any self respecting Anglo Saxon or other White person of European ancestry who has an ounce of integrity or self respect would not identify as a Zionist or align themselves with Zionist Jews. “Our” leaders don’t represent the TRADITIONAL AMERICAN, which is the Anglo Saxon at all, they don’t even represent the Native Americans for that matter, they represent Jewish Supremacists and cater to everyone under the Sun but Anglo Saxons and other REAL WHITES. ZionistNegroLGBTQ$PLC would be more of an accurate term on runs America in 2020.
That’s what I find strange about the Anglo-Americans who are the founding people of the USA. They’re anti-British and anti-Catholic even though both the British Monarchy and Roman Catholicism are White Western European Institutions which form a major part of Western Civilization.
Isn’t this quite intuitive? I guess the American people grew out of the English Puritan emigres. They were persecuted dissidents in England who were subjugated by the English royalists, and of course had a hatred for the Catholic Church (believing it to be corrupt beyond redemption). S0 naturally they didn’t like the British monarchy or the Catholic Church. I suppose that the state of being a cast-out dissident may make you more prone to value virtues such as tolerance, ‘diversity’, coalitions of the oppressed and free speech.
Simultaneously, Puritans were inculcated with the belief that the resurrection of a Jewish Israel would lead to rapture. This was because Cromwell wanted to allow Jews to reenter England, so he could commandeer their financial scamming skills. Accordingly, he had his Puritan religious leaders come up with religious rationalisation as to why Jews should be allowed to reenter and why they should be tolerated and why their cause should be supported. These bizarre, contrary-to-the-Bible, beliefs still abound in Evangelicalism.
Maybe these ideologies and impulses continue to resonate in the American collective mind. The latter (“tolerance” of Jewry and the virtue of “tolerance” more widely) has certainly been seized upon and sustained for parasitic purposes.
Yes...The actions of Amsterdam's Jews in the lead up to BOE formation in 1694, is crucial to understand. Funding new Bibles into existence and at great expense, which cast the Jew as the "special people" of the book was part of the con. Why would Jews spend enormous funds on printing Bibles to then be passed out to English speakers?Also, funding old testament Christianity e.g. Cromwell, was part of the same Jew con. The money came from usury collected from scamming Dutch people.Judaizer Christianity has long been part of Mammon's efforts to subvert Christian injunctions against usury. It's wonderful to get rich, no matter how you do it. Materialism is glorious, etc.
This was because Cromwell wanted to allow Jews to reenter England, so he could commandeer their financial scamming skills
Isn’t this quite intuitive? I guess the American people grew out of the English Puritan emigres. They were persecuted dissidents in England who were subjugated by the English royalists, and of course had a hatred for the Catholic Church (believing it to be corrupt beyond redemption). S0 naturally they didn’t like the British monarchy or the Catholic Church. I suppose that the state of being a cast-out dissident may make you more prone to value virtues such as tolerance, ‘diversity’, coalitions of the oppressed and free speech.From my knowledge of US history, the English Puritans fled religious persecution in England to settle in America where they formed the newfound English colonies in New England. After a century or so of English colonization, the Anglo-American descendants of those English colonists rebelled against the British Monarchy. That could explain why the Yanks are so hostile to the British Monarchy even though the UK has already evolved to become a Constitutional Monarchy with a Parliamentary Democracy. As for Roman Catholicism, their anti-Catholic hostility is baffling given that the Yanks never were subject to the religious authority of the Roman Pope unlike, say, the Germans who were persecuted by Catholic Powers during the Counter-Reformation. In contrast, British Canadians don't have any problems with the British Monarchy nor do the French-Canadians have any problems with Roman Catholicism.
Simultaneously, Puritans were inculcated with the belief that the resurrection of a Jewish Israel would lead to rapture. This was because Cromwell wanted to allow Jews to reenter England, so he could commandeer their financial scamming skills. Accordingly, he had his Puritan religious leaders come up with religious rationalisation as to why Jews should be allowed to reenter and why they should be tolerated and why their cause should be supported. These bizarre, contrary-to-the-Bible, beliefs still abound in Evangelicalism.Yes, this phenomenon called "Christian Zionism" is quite bizarre which hardly exists in Europe and Latin America. For a Roman Catholic to be a "Christian Zionist" is equivalent to a Muslim Arab becoming a Roman Catholic.
Maybe these ideologies and impulses continue to resonate in the American collective mind. The latter (“tolerance” of Jewry and the virtue of “tolerance” more widely) has certainly been seized upon and sustained for parasitic purposes.Why did they allow all those crazy politically-correct stuff to run wild in the USA? And how come they didn't do anything to protect the white descendants of European immigrants who arrived a century earlier? My view: they could be suffering from White guilt but also possess an anti-European subconscious which would explain why they've allowed tens of millions of Asian immigrants, Latino illegals, Muslim refugees, African migrants, etc. into the USA.Replies: @NoCriticHere, @Alden, @Alden
Nonsense. It is not a matter of sources, but interpretation. You seem to think everything Hitler did was ipso facto blameless .... even though the results were catastrophic. That is some sort of religion ... not rational thinking.The Night of Long Knives was not a crime? It was not directed by Hitler?
but that can certainly be refuted on several grounds
Saggy,
Hitler’s miscalculations are having serious repercussions to the white race, no doubt.
That then brings up questions about NSDAP organizing hierarchy. (There is always hierarchy, despite Jewish nonsense liberal concepts such as free trade and free markets.)
Here is the policy:
Under National Socialism, the head of state wielded supreme power. This was with the understanding that there would be no favoritism directing public affairs, and that “along with the loftiest unlimited authority, the leader bears the final, heaviest responsibility,” as stated in NS Briefe.33 Rehm offered this explanation in Die SA: “This system differs from dictatorship in that the appointed leader accepts responsibility before the people and is sustained by the confidence of the nation. . . . His actions insure that the leadership of the state is in harmony with the overall interests of the nation and its views. The essence of this system is overcoming party differences, formation of a genuine national community, and the unsurpassed greatness of the leadership as prerequisites. The leader of the authoritarian state personifies the principle of Friedrich the Great: I am the first servant of the state.”
There has to be some sort of check on power, or power sharing. That is the failure of NSDAP hierarchy. One man at the top of they pyramid, held too much power. All humans make mistakes, and their mistakes can redound catastrophically.
In Hungarian Constitutional Kingdom, if the King got too far out of alignment with his mandate, then there would be a recall election. Like NSDAP they also didn’t have parties, but instead representatives of sectors of the economy. Hungarian system was similar to national socialism, but the Kings over 1000 year period tended to make pretty good decisions…. nothing as catastrophic as Hitler’s mistakes. Kings that got froggy and too far out of alignment, were ejected from power.
This may explain what led a British ‘scientist’ to reach a ludicrous and farfetched estimate that Britain could be heading towards an astronomic death figure of 510.000. Following the same flawed algorithm, Anthony Fauci advised the American president that America could see two million dead. Both scientists were wrong by a factor of 25-40 times.
Both of those things are self-explanatory: both Ferguson and Fauci have a history of over-hyping a pathogen in order to advance their careers.
Fauci’s first career-augmenting hysterical hobby-horse was hetero-AIDS. His nonsense was part of the general cesspit of nonsense that encouraged Oprah to declare in 1987, that by 1990 20% of heterosexual Americans would die from AIDS.
Ferguson is a serial offender.
2001 – he claimed that 130,000 people would develop variant Kreutzfeld-Yakob disease (vCJD). Since that time, there have been a total of 128 deaths globally.
2005 – he claimed that H5N1 (avian flu) was going to rival the 1918 flu (in fairness, he wasn’t – and isn’t – alone):
“Around 40 million people died in 1918 Spanish flu outbreak,” said Prof Ferguson. “There are six times more people on the planet now so you could scale it up to around 200 million people probably.” Actual toll – globally – in the following 15 years: 455.
2009 – he claimed that H1N1 (‘swine flu’) could infect a third of the world’s population; that it had an IFR of 0.4-1.4%; that it would be in line with the 1957 pandemic that killed about 3.5 million people (he caveated that immediately, by claiming that health care was better now). Actual toll: 18,036
These people catastrophise for a living. It’s immensely profitable for them, personally and professionally.
There is no market for not crying “Wolf!” every autumn: there is a lucrative market for telling doomsday stories that encourage everyone to get vaccinated.
by your strawman logic. nowhere have i said empty land can't be settled and turned into a homeland. with my fictional viking example I even justify recognizing conquered land as a homeland and being able to spring blood and soil ties. My point is that you can't do that with a land where natives exist and were interbred with the settlers and importing kidnapped negroes and settled by waves of different ethnicities. If that is the case the negroes, natives and all ethnicities that were permitted into the country have just as a legitimate claim to blood and soil.
The ‘Native American’ ethnic groups had Asian ancestry, I believe. Therefore, according to your logic, they had no right to be in ‘the Americas’.
by your strawman logic. nowhere have i said empty land can’t be settled and turned into a homeland. with my fictional viking example I even justify recognizing conquered land as a homeland and being able to spring blood and soil ties. My point is that you can’t do that with a land where natives exist and were interbred with the settlers and importing kidnapped negroes and settled by waves of different ethnicities. If that is the case the negroes, natives and all ethnicities that were permitted into the country have just as a legitimate claim to blood and soil.
I don’t agree with that. Surely the logic is that ‘white people’ (American-created ethnic group) were the ethnic group that formed the American nation. Others were present during its formation, as minority groups (i.e. living under the rule of the dominant ethnic group). These original minority groups can continue to live as minorities (i.e. denoting a different assignation of rights) or alternatively assimilate into the majority group. A bit like how the Japanese ethnic groups exists as a clear entity with territorial claim, despite their being more original ‘native’ groups to the Japanese islands that live among them.
fyi I think the boer claim to the cape area is legitimate because it was empty.
I don’t think that really matters – I mean, I don’t see why this emptiness legitimises Boers’ claims to the Cape area (from which they’ve been displaced by British settlers BTW), but would then delegitimise Japanese claims, presumably. Territorial squabbles are impossible to resolve as the (tribal) humans can endlessly create justification for why their in-group deserves an area of land (under whichever rationale, whether that be historical ownership or due to it being ‘the will of God’, etc). In reality, ownership goes to whoever controls the territory. Self-confident groups will assert claims, bullied and demoralized groups will relinquish.
I speak of the americas and not solely the U.S because all the americas share this history, or interbreeding and multiethnic settling and slavery.
All nations are sort of multi-ethnic or can be conceived of like that. I could divide my native Scotland into Germanic/Anglo/Nordic types (more east coast), and then Irish Celts (west coast), What’s relevant is the conception of ethnicity, then hierarchy of ethnicities – ideally reflected in numerical dominance – and then the system through which minority groups can co-exist under the dominant group’s protection (where they wish to define themselves differently and not assimilate). Including some differentiation of rights, probably/perhaps. The term ‘ethnicity’ can enjoy different degrees of definition. You could try to say that everyone is of the same ethnicity where they submit to the same broad ideology/guiding worldview (e.g. Jesus Christ is our saviour, the pillars of Islam, ‘diversity is our greatest strength’) – irrespective of their genealogy – or more tightly in terms of their ethnic genealogy (e.g. Aryan blood).
Europe cans close its borders and end the welfare state and it goes back to being monoethnic states(like former ussr states are.) If the U.S does the same the brown and black people will still be there, plus all the european ethnicities that immigrated.
I don’t see why brown people can’t be assimilated and the blakz live as a minority.
Just think about how many U.S states have non european names? One state is called New Mexico for christ’s sakes.
I don’t see why everything needs to relate to Europe necessarily. Some Indians think of themselves as caucasian people – I’ve heard them call themselves the “original caucasians” – and they sometimes seem to assert a racial tie to white British people through this. Which is intuitive often given their looks (basically the same but with a tan).
I think there had been a miscommunication. I am saying the americas will remain multiracial. And the only blood and soil ties that will form will be mutli-ethnic, multiracial. no one race in the Americas have an exclusive blood and soil claim.I have not said Japanese claims to territory are legitimate or illegitimate. You are putting up strawmen, you have not even specified the territory you talk of.my original post was to point out the ridiculousness of those who wish to claim only Euro Americans have exclusive claim to blood and soil tiesReplies: @Sunshine
I don’t see why brown people can’t be assimilated and the blakz live as a minority.
Only when Whites, who are nationalists, choose to identify as White Nationalists does the left go completely and pathologically crazy and start spewing radioactive levels of hate and venom and trying to destroy the lives and careers of these racially healthy White men or women.
These leftists are mortal enemies of White Americans. They hate the White race and make no apologies for their obsession to genocide the White race into extinction.
The effectiveness of the holocaust industry on display.
Jews, the eternal victim is now nailed to the Cross instead of Christ. The Jew, nailed to the cross, is being tormented by a German.
Holocaustianity is now any white man as proxy German, torturing the Jew.
The left are pathologically crazy, because of inverted reality where new religion of holocaustianity teaches that whites cannot be redeemed. Weak minded whites (the left) identify with their tormentors and simultaneously virtue signal so they will not be attacked for having bad-think.
The effectiveness of the holocaust industry on display.
Jews, the eternal victim is now nailed to the Cross instead of Christ. The Jew, nailed to the cross, is being tormented by a German.
Holocaustianity is now any white man as proxy German, torturing the Jew.
An interesting discovery for me was the channel of Horus. An anonymous British man who has done extensive reading and then documentation around WW 2 and Jewish power. His research consisted of several books available on this site and I think he was inspired by your own articles. One of his videos included the situation of Churchill the Jews
Video Link
What I found interesting was that Churchill did not have to be bankrupt to then be bought by the Focus group or money from the Czech lobby. He and his father Randolph Churchill were live long acquaintances of the Rothschilds and other extremely wealthy and powerful Jewish families who groomed Churchill from his childhood on. Which contributed to his Zionism and “semitophilia”, a worship of Jews so very similar to America’s current gentile elites.
I would also add that the Rothschilds were bankers of Prussia and Friedrich der Große initially; it had been the plan of this enlightened monarch to make the emancipated Rothschild family loyal to the crown and use their abilities according to his own enlightenment ideals. Ultimately this “liberal civic nationalist approach” ended with the Rothschilds funding the French Revolution, abandoning Germany, then the Balfour Declaration and Two World Wars. – According to the Americans over at The Right Stuff Alexander Hamilton also had the rather peculiar idea to bring the younger brother of Friedrich der Große to the USA and crown him king.
Jewish-German relations are the history of the world and everything else is but a footnote.
You have failed to mention that this story would have to justify that only euro-Americans would have exclusive claims to the Americas.
Which can’t be done because if the story is based on might is right and conquest than the story doesn’t matter, Xi Jinping can claim the Americas as long as he mighty enough to take it.
Yes I know. This is how territory works. A group of people control it and then create histories – stories – which justify their ownership of that territory. Or in the case of the USA, they create histories which state that the controlling ethnic group does not deserve to own the territory.
A story based in history and reality and any morality, could not justify exclusive euro-American claim to the americas.
It’s not the entire Americas, it’s to the US territory.
Euro-Americans just have to realize their ancestors left their homeland, and make the best of it. Sorry but you don’t pick your ancestors or their actions. History may be changed or forgiven, but thousands of years of non-european presence and millions of non European people in the americas can’t be eliminated. and if you propose to do so. than might is right and no homeland should be respected.
The ‘Native American’ ethnic groups had Asian ancestry, I believe. Therefore, according to your logic, they had no right to be in ‘the Americas’.
Basically no-one has the right to form a nation in ‘the Americas’, according to you. In fact the only human nation can be formed in the Rift Valley.
by your strawman logic. nowhere have i said empty land can't be settled and turned into a homeland. with my fictional viking example I even justify recognizing conquered land as a homeland and being able to spring blood and soil ties. My point is that you can't do that with a land where natives exist and were interbred with the settlers and importing kidnapped negroes and settled by waves of different ethnicities. If that is the case the negroes, natives and all ethnicities that were permitted into the country have just as a legitimate claim to blood and soil.
The ‘Native American’ ethnic groups had Asian ancestry, I believe. Therefore, according to your logic, they had no right to be in ‘the Americas’.
The americas could only have been a blood and soil nation only if it had never been colonized. but it was and it can’t be undone.
Why on earth would colonization preclude a sense of ethnic territorial possession? Every agriculturally-productive centimetre of land on this earth has been colonized and then reconquered, with the original tribe then removed or absorbed into the conquerors, or their joining a wider religious group or something. The logic of your post precludes all ethnic groups from a sense of territory.
White Americans need to create a story which states why they deserve their territory, and how it belongs to them. If they don’t – and actually publicly broadcast to all-comers and the entire world that their possession of the American territory is unjustified as they do currently – other people will come along and take it from them, very simple. North America is prime real-estate, there are plenty of suitors.
it wouldn't. importing and breeding negroes for slave labor and importing a multitude of ethnicities to a colonized land while enslaving the natives while breeding with them, on the other hand would prevent blood and soil ties to a land openly stolen and then populated by multiple ethnicities, some forcibly such as slaves, for the purposes of economic exploitation instead of creation of an ethnic homeland.If the vikings had conquered greenland and canada, let's say all the americas. then they could form blood and soil ties.but if the vikings started importing non vikings and even negroes, then the result would be a cosmopolitan country founded for the purposes of money instead of an ethnic homeland.
Why on earth would colonization preclude a sense of ethnic territorial possession
White Americans need to create a story which states why they deserve their territory, and how it belongs to themYou have failed to mention that this story would have to justify that only euro-Americans would have exclusive claims to the Americas.Which can't be done because if the story is based on might is right and conquest than the story doesn't matter, Xi Jinping can claim the Americas as long as he mighty enough to take it.A story based in history and reality and any morality, could not justify exclusive euro-American claim to the americas.Euro-Americans just have to realize their ancestors left their homeland, and make the best of it. Sorry but you don't pick your ancestors or their actions. History may be changed or forgiven, but thousands of years of non-european presence and millions of non European people in the americas can't be eliminated. and if you propose to do so. than might is right and no homeland should be respected.Replies: @Anonymous
Present day Germany is occupied territory.
Trump has had two open coup attempts in three years, and a constant barrage of leaks etc. His purges are clearly at least three years too late.
Also, to an outsider, it’s strange how some right-wing American journalists write in a way which indicates that they have faith in the due process, checks-and-balances etc afforded by the American system. I don’t understand how any American right-winger could maintain their faith in the U.S. political system, it seems corrupt approaching the point that it is beyond-repair.
‘officials in the know worried that the British Air Force, especially “Butcher” Harris, would face war crimes trials when the war was over.’
When I was at Sandhurst in 1977-78, we cadets had the rare ‘privilege’ of attending a lecture by Sir Arhur Harris, appropriately enough at the Churchill Hall (the main lecture theatre at the Royal Military Academy). The then eighty-five year old Harris had been wheeled out to give his talk, which came as a surprise not only to us cadets but also to the War Studies staff at the academy. I well recall him boasting that his campaign of terror bombing had been “not only the greatest air victory of the war, but also the greatest victory of all our forces both on land and sea.” He attempted to back up this extraordinary claim by arguing that the bombing campaign had assisted the naval and land efforts by sapping Germany’s morale and by drawing in vital components of their military. He concluded by – so it seemed to us – bragging that “had the war gone the other way, I have no doubt at all that I would have found myself in court arraigned on war-crime charges.”
After his lecture (which the whole Academy attended, not just us senior cadets at Old College), we made our way back to the War Studies Department, to discuss what we had heard with our War Studies tutor, Dr John Pimlott. He asked us what we thought of what we had just heard. Most of us had formed an adverse opinion, and regarded what he’d said as bluster and indeed as glorying his own bloody and criminal career. Dr Pimlott agreed, and indeed went further.
In retrospect, I can identify this event as sowing in my mind the first seed of doubt regarding the ‘official’ history of WWII. One that lay dormant for many years, but one that has now grown into a firm and healthy tree of obloquy towards ‘the Allies’ and the despicable and unnecessary war that they were determined to prosecute.
Brilliant, Craig, thanks! And disgusting. Makes us disgusted with us. And you don’t even mention FDR’s trick of engineering the Pearl Harbor attack, sacrificing US sailors etc. Of course they are disposable, hence USS Liberty only 22 years after the war.
You also wrote in the article under discussion, https://www.unz.com/proberts/churchills-war-the-real-history-of-world-war-ii/ :
"What was the Holocaust? According to zionists, the Holocaust was National Socialist Germany’s elimination of 6 million Jews by first gassing them and then cremating the bodies. It is unclear how Germany managed this feat when all of its limited and dwindling resources were employed, unsuccessfully as it turns out, on the Russian front.Photos demonstrating the Holocaust include dead skeletal-like bodies. But these are not people gased and cremated. These are deaths from typhus and starvation. The disintegrating German state had no food or medicines for Germans and often not for its own soldiers. Concentration camp inmates were on the bottom of the totem pole.
Let’s see, I report what scientists, architects, and engineers conclude about 3 WTC buildings, and that makes me a “conspiracy theorist.” I report what people who have studied the holocaust say, and that makes me a “holocaust denier.” I also report what the zionist say. Does that make me a holocaust believer? If I report that mathematics concludes that 2 + 2 = 4, does that make me a mathematician?
It seems that people have lost the ability to understand what they read.
I remember being confused and shocked as a child when my grandfather – a v. high-ranking British officer during WWII and an extremely interesting/intelligent person – said that Jewry were the clear victors of the conflict, and that Hitler was “a truly great man”.
It’s sickening to gain this clearer understanding of WWII as a Brit, imagine what it must be like for Germans. I hope they wake up.
This is a valuable lesson for those of us, myself included, who had been convinced in recent years that any kind of serious crisis would prove to be a tipping point in Western consciousness about multiculturalism
The populace’s consciousnesses have already arrived at this tipping point, and that was clearly signalled by the Trump and Brexit votes. The State/establishment is aware of this, but there is ZERO chance it will alter is multi-kulti ideology in response to any social event, any large-scale disaster, any showing of popular will or any other similar form of external pressure exerted on the ideology. ZERO. It is a cult with its own telos, has to be removed by revolution or purges, etc.
“Progressivism” is just another name for Cultural Marxism/Bolshevism, and it totally misdirects white people who have a leftist predisposition in terms of the personality traits. In general, Christianity is far superior for such people – by miles.
Virtually every country that resisted lock downs ultimately gave in when their health care service got overwhelmed. Today I notice their new cases are up by 10%.
I can only talk about the UK, but our government actually caved in at the first hint of public pressure – i.e. when they came to understand that the ‘herd immunity’ strategy would leave them vulnerable to campaigns of hysteria, promoted by socialist neurotics etc. Family members work as doctors, and they say that the hospitals they work in never got overwhelmed, and are currently much quieter than usual.
If USA had implemented a full quarantine since March. This virus would already be over.
Yes, and if we put everyone in straight jackets, there would be no deaths by suicide either. The question is not whether quarantines work. The question is whether Covid-19 warrants such a severe curtailment of civil liberties. Covid-19 deaths are less than the flu and much less than diseases like Tuberculosis which kill over 1.5 million a year so the answer is no – Quarantines are not warranted.
This bullshit is why I support anti-stupidity totalitarianism.
The Offended, which would include everyone who cries about such things (the sponsors, all the tech giants, journalists etc) as well as every single supporter (which probably means a good 150 million people in America alone) instantly gets the Desensitization camp. There they’re showered with slurs and “offensive” stuff until they are husks.
I see no other solution to this outrage fetish. And that’s only if this isn’t decided by blood, that they are genetically predisposed to be braindead idiots who masturbate to finding thoughtcrime. Then the waste of manpower might be severe…
For the most part they are not playing along because of some supposed principle: they play along because gullible fuckwits who can't think good (H/T Zoolander) are easily their most profitable customer segment. They spend money working out who those people are (all they really need to do identify people who buy Apple products within 8 months of the product's release date).
the sponsors, all the tech giants
From an American perspective the Muslim-British Labor vote puts Jews at some disadvantage. They are not always liked by US blacks or Hispanics, but can agree with them politically.
But UK is different. Labor is code for Muslim.
I don’t think Jews are that anti-Muslim. They seem to dislike whites more than Muslims. Jews are more interested in dominating the top of the hierarchy and dismantling all opposition there, Muslims are lower order – their culture doesn’t value intellect particularly highly, it doesn’t seem.
Jews’ problem with Corbyn and Sanders is to do with their deviance from “international capitalist” economic orthodoxy, I would say.
Jews dominated the Labour Party during the Tony Blair years and afterwards (when Jew Ed Milliband was in charge). During that time, Jews actually advocated for millions of Pakistani Muslims to move to the UK (Peter Mandelson, shadowy Jew advisor, said the Labour govt “sent out search parties” for them). The Labour Party also become officially supportive of bankster capitalism. Ordinary Labour members voting in Corbyn represented a turn away from ‘international finance’ and a loss of control for Jewry. The ridiculous “anti-Semitism” accusations where more to do with that, as opposed to any concomitant increase in Islamic influence, I’d say.
Yes, the British scrub any story that takes place in their country that has to do with their Africans and/or Muslims behaving badly, but they do seem to take some adverse pleasure in reporting on ours, as if to prove to their own people that ours are somehow worse than theirs.
For a long time – since we lost the Empire and the USA surpassed us in the order, as cemented during the Suez Crisis – the totally idiot British political class has tried to reconstruct its sense of self-esteem through demonstration that Britain is “less racist”than the USA. The Muslim grooming gangs affair guaranteed that vanity project’s complete and utter failure (HA HA), and the political class has suffered existential crisis ever since.
There seem to be a higher proportion of white Americans who are brainwashed members of the Political Correctness cult, as compared to whites in other countries (e.g. UK). Many white Americans seem to believe as a matter of religious conviction that chattel slavery was invented by Brits and white American settlers in the 17th Century (never took place anywhere ever before), and was only ever historically practised by white Anglo people upon ‘da BlLaKz’. They cannot be shifted from this conviction, despite it being so ridiculous.
Matthew McConaughey is so smug, disingenuous and annoying in this film, he ruins it.