RSSBy following an anti-white reverse racism policy as part of a general divide and conquer strategy, the borg, regime, or whatever you want to call it, has lost the last vestiges of legitimacy. It then becomes more difficult for it to achieve obedience, and corruption also redoubles, since following rules against one’s interest beomes obviously stupid. Meanwhile, the token types and quislings running things will also be less competent, so this will also contribute to and bolster a vicious cycle circling the drain.
While I agree with Hopkins that a cult-like sort of medico-fascism has taken over the Anglosphere based on propaganda and total control of the narrative, it is interesting that ARD, which is equivalent to BBC or CBC, is starting to go off the reservation. If the continental countries along with Russia, etc. jump ship, it will be harder to maintain the sort of “invasion of the bodysnatchers” mentality they are attempting to put in place.
When you try to argue, you have already lost.
Also, the cult leader’s nonsensical gibberish is not as nonsensical as it may seem at first. Most of us, upon encountering such gibberish, assume that the cult leader is trying to communicate, and that something is very wrong with his brain. The cult leader isn’t trying to communicate. He is trying to disorient and control the listener’s mind.
“Antifa” are nothing more than controlled fascists espousing identity politics which is the 21st century iteration of fascism, “fascism with good manners” after George Carlin, who are masquerading as resisting fascism. Black lives matter are reverse racists in the tradition of the classic Orwell satire “Animal Farm”. Some pigs (or lives) are more equal than others. They are a multi-racial group of thugs including a large measure of self-hating whites.
Though Buchanan has had a great career as a sceptic of yankee imperialism, some times his views are infected by the remnants of a belief in it he has been unable to fully shake.
It is a paean to theft and corruption by a professional pervert.
This wraps it up entirely, and I say that as a former lifelong democrat, though what turned me against them first was the Libya war crimes and the obvious use of el qaeda type barbarians to overthrow the Syrian government. As the article indicates, power for its own sake is the goal, and decency and morality have gone by the boards. The serial crimes of the power structure making up the power structure’s pattern of sedition, the tactics they have used for years to overthrow any regime or government inconvenient to them, are revealed by this article, which won’t appear in the legacy press because they are almost all complicit in the effort. So many red lines, or using the older metaphor “rubicons” have been crossed, from falsely accusing a nuclear power to causing hundreds of billions or even trillions in economic damage by the reaction to a medium serious illness to the way they allowed “protesters” to run riot over many of the nations cities. This is all unprecedented in the US.
The article touches accurately on the real dangers of color revolution which seem to be arising from the Black Lives Matter initiative. It is not traditional Marxism but a politically correct bastardized racial knock-off used for divide et impera (divide and rule) by the power structure. The article and most of the comments it inspired have been useful. Unfortunately, I suspect that the results, though destructive, may be beyond the control of those instigating this stuff.
This seems like a good explanation of what is happening. I wonder whether too many people will fall for the propaganda, though. It is the classic effort to get the turkeys to support thanksgiving.
If they can take our culture from us they render us nobodies. That is why we have to resist.
This article seems to be the last word on the subject. It reveals that the color revolution modus operandi is now being employed within the US itself. As one can tell from the funding, these are paid thugs and faux revolutionaries engaged in sedition, and even if they make true critiques, the massive funding reveals them as frauds.
If the identity of the assassin is known, and the legal system, under the same control as the failing city government, makes no moves against him, then another “rubicon” has been crossed, and the legitimacy of the entire edifice is at risk. The implications are discussed above in Achmed E. Neuman’s comment.
I find the article a credible and convincing explanation of what has gone on and the reasons for it. The fact that the power structure is going after arguably a victim as a result of the action reveals how far gone the system is.
The article has it right. We can see the triumph of globocapitalist politically correct uniparty fascism should Biden triumph. Trump, though sceptical of elements of the ruling ideology, buys in to too much of it and also lacks the ability and competency to resist the power structure successfully.
That's very funny. Don't you read the papers. Who other than Trump could have survived, at least so far, what's been and continues to be thrown at him?
Trump . . . . lacks the ability and competency to resist the power structure successfully.
While Biden once may have been a bit more intelligent than the harpy, he is now approaching the non compos mentis stage. It will be difficult to “mask” this fact even in the year of the mask.
This is a classic case of projection, accusing the other side of what you are engaged in, fomenting race riots in a chaos creation and divide and conquer strategy. By doing this the democrats crossed the rubicon and threatened the very legitimacy of the yankee regime and poisoned the chalice if they manage to win on this basis, since the normal majority will see the regime as totally illegitimate and not worthy of obedience.
This convinces me as an explanation of the whole crisis.
This is a great article which points the finger directly at the major problem.
The article says it all about what is going on. As an aside the mask thing is part of the charade. It is amazing to examine the way the media structure is all in on supporting this color revolution model in this instance. The campaign is reckless because it seems to me this whole campaign has released a gini which can’t be easily put back in the bottle and likely will set a template for civil war, particularly if it triumphs in November.
This is profoundly depressing but the facts seem to support this version of reality.
This is a belief that has been successfully seeded in the public mind by our omnipotent brainwashing machinery. We may have had a durable and stable system of control. But democracy? I don't think so. Real representative democracy has yet to show its face in our body politic. Those in control would regard it as subversive to our oligarchy and will not allow real democracy to flourish.
Most people regard the US as a fairly stable democracy and yet...
Under the new dispensation normal is the definition of second class status.
I have a lot of respect for the Saker’s commentaries in general and concur with his view of this situation. It is almost treason for authorities to look the other way while thugs actually are given de facto control of a territory within a major city. While the yankee cops have literally been getting away with murder for a long time, the protests are obviously being manipulated, and stability is under threat. If the official authority allows this to take place, it is understandable that vigilante types will step in. I notice that the vigilante in New Mexico had a Spanish name and that, therefore, he is himself a member of a minority. These are troubled times and instability and major unrest will be the likely results.
This is symptomatic of something more ominous. What we're really witnessing is nothing less than
It is almost treason for authorities to look the other way while thugs actually are given de facto control of a territory within a major city.
There's a lot of providential thinking making the rounds online. That this is all a part of a plan.Planning is one thing. Divine Providence is another.And what's happening now has nothing to do with Divine Providence.Sure, there's some planning involved. But it's no more absolute than its results are guaranteed. If the hostile elite have proven one thing in the last 100+ years it's that, though they might be very good at infiltration, subversion, betrayal, destruction and death, they're no damn good at social-management. I'm afraid the elite have gotten themselves in for a bit more than they can manage."The readiness is all."Replies: @ThreeCranes
The Pyrrhic Victory Of The Hostile Elite
This is an excellent article. Political correctness is inimical to free speech and the rule of law. Things have degenerated to a disgraceful level. I happened to see the presstitute media’s handling of the retired naval officer while I was in a medical waiting room on Monday. It reveals that the Scarlet Letter is still alive, and that things have degenerated disgracefully as Dr. Roberts has shown repeatedly over the last 10 years or so. I fully concur with his viewpoint and remind readers that George Carlin defined political correctness as fascism with good manners.
Resentment of the lockdown rules and resentment of the economic costs which will become even more apparent as time goes on most certainly bolstered the riot activity and provided it with a racial diversity it otherwise may not have achieved. As is noted, the fact most rioters skated will quickly bury the social distancing, since it is mere theatre, especially outside, and since business cannot be viably operated under these absurd guidelines anyway. People won’t admit that they are tired of Soviet style waiting in long lines, but have often been afraid to admit such facts since it is considered politically incorrect to do so. As George Carlin once said, and I paraphrase, political correctness is merely fascism with good manners.
I concur with Mr. Whitney on the lockdown. As he notes, the Norwegian premier has apologised, and, unnoted by him, the Danish government, which went against the advice of their health experts and imposed a greater measure of lockdown, has admitted it to be a mistake. Sweden, as noted, did mishandle the old folks homes and allowed it to spread there.
I think that the national wave of looting and riotous anarchy in the wake of the police murder in Minneapolis carried out by all races has been redoubled by the loss of legitimacy of the regime as a result of the economic failure being engendered by the overreaction to the virus. It may well only be a foretaste of a chronic situation as time goes on.
I also concur with Kratoklastes, and think pictures of all of the prison thugs working the case, and the fascist judge should be published widely.
The US government is acting like the mob taking over a business and busting it up.
There was no proof of Soleimani’s direct involvement in the attack on the embassy, which was a blowback reaction from the yankee killing of dozens of Iraqis in bases fighting ISIS thugs (whom convincing evidence indicates have had covert support from the US or US related sources. In fact, a day or two before the yankee hit on Soleimani, Soleimani had probably been involved in cooling the tensions and withdrawing from the embassy occupation.
The embassy itself is not an ordinary embassy but a fortress which stands as an element of reduced continuing occupation which resulted from the war on Iraq, which itself was an “aggressive war”, defined as a war crime by US prosecutor Robert Jackson at the Nuremberg trial.
Finally, I oppose the “resistance to Trump” based on the official democratic party, which lost its legitimacy propagating the phony Russia scare, and the fake impeachment based on demanding the truth about Biden’s corruption and democrat critiques on Trump for being not warlike enough based on phony stories about Russian collusion or attempting to pressure the Ukrainian regime which itself was a puppet regime installed by the deep state under Obama. I would obviously favour impeachment of Trump based on ordering an assassination of an important figure in a government contrary to international law and existing US laws.
Well, the POTUS wasn't looking to try him in an American court. apparently.
There was no proof of Soleimani’s direct involvement in the attack on the embassy . . .
Pompeo’s speech, as, in effect, a confession as to his motives for the assassination, is also, in effect, a confession he committed a war crime. Should the yankee imperium loses relative power in the future and thus loses its exemption from war crimes consideration, Pompeo, if he travels abroad, may at some future point, face consequences.
I agree with the tenor of this article. By ordering the Soleimani liquidation, Trump has marked himself off as a major war criminal, which follows the pattern set by recent presidents, Bush, by conducting aggressive war against Iraq and Obama by doing the same against Khaddafi. Convincing evidence indicates that Clinton may of set this pattern by his efforts against Yugoslavia, which followed the pattern instituted by Bush Pere in his illegal war to overthrow Panama and questionable actions in Iraq.
As for the present situation, this is, indeed, the real impeachable offense. The absurd charges preferred earlier by Pelosi’s House faction do not stand up to serious examination. How could “attempting to influence the Ukraine” to pursue realistic, largely proven corruption charges against Biden and son be considered “abuse of power” when the Obama regime earlier indulged in the overthrow of the Ukrainian government and the creation of the puppet regime Trump was dealing with?
War crimes are the ultimate abuse of power. It is interesting to note how brazen things have become. When in 1960 the US imperium liquidated Patrice Lumumba, the Congolese head of state they tried to keep it quiet. Now it is open and notorious. Not even Stalin or Hitler assassinated key political figures of states they officially had declared war against. Soleimani, in effect, was the leading general and acted as a sort of war minister for the Iranian government. His liquidation, as indicated by the article, is a serious, perhaps unprecedented breach of international law and its perpetrators can therefore be described as acting beyond any concept of legality with all that entails.
I agree with the first commenter to a large extent, but disagree that Labour is an instrument of Israel to the same extent as the Tories. This is the explanation of the entire controversy. It seems to me that the professional Jews, by revealing themselves as part of this establishment, are setting all Jews up for a backlash if the tories win and living standards drastically implode, for example because of the loss of the NHS. This, it seems to me, is helping to resurrect old stereotypes buried by the rise and fall of the Nazi regime in Germany.
The events in Bolivia lead me to suspect that the so-called protesters are being paid by yankee spymasters and thus are paid by foreign elements with all that implies; it also implies that they deserve what they get.
An easier solution which does less damage to the rule of law is obviously not to let them in in the first place.
Bringing in the people from the area destabilized by US “regime change activities” will only destabilize the areas they are settled in. Survival in a failed state atmosphere such as one the US imperium has created in Somalia creates tough people schooled in the art of survival ready to engage in what they see as necessary to survive. We have seen what happens when ghettos develop made up of those who have had to develop thuggish behavior in order to survive in their destabilized country end up in western countries. The authorities allowing this to happen are betraying the people already in the places they are allowing to be settled by this element which has been made dangerous by what they have had to endure as a result of western imperialist activities over the last 30 years or so.
That's called blowback or, for the Biblically inclined Zionist ruling elite: "They that sow the wind, shall reap the whirlwind" .
The authorities allowing this to happen are betraying the people already in the places they are allowing to be settled by this element which has been made dangerous by what they have had to endure as a result of western imperialist activities over the last 30 years or so.
I always refer to 11 September as National Reichstag Fire Day. However it happened it was certainly used opportunistically by the yankee regime (and the zionists) to bolster the dictatorial and authoritarian elements of the regime. I am certain that the Israelis, at the least, were aware of the conspiracy as it occurred.
and:
When considering the facts, it seems incredible that the myth of Nazi responsibility for firing the Reichstag could ever have been accepted at all. Yet it was, and by reputable historians such as Alan Bullock, author of Hitler: A Study in Tyranny, and Anthony Sutton, author of Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler. One wonders what other mythical versions of historical incidents have been accepted by historians and others "without looking at the evidence."
Replies: @Curmudgeon
"After the fire in the Reichstag on February 27 1933 forces hostile to the national socialist party claimed that it was they themselves who started the fire to set up their communist opposition. But several sources including British historian A J P Taylor and Fritz Tobias who wrote the book The Reichstag Fire - Legend and Reality have come to the conclusion that they did not. But to people who pay no notice to historical research and prefer propaganda the Reichstag fire is right up there with Gleiwitz."
From my Ph. D. research and seeing survivors with tattoos I am convinced that the Nazi regime did engage in exterminations, but I know that Jewish people were not the only targets. The actual number exterminated is open to interpretation, but a great many were obviously exterminated. Proof that something happened can be seen in comparisons of the ethnic makeup of territories before and after Nazi occupation. Over 3 Million Soviet POW’s were also liquidated in Nazi camps and hundreds of thousands of other non-Jewish people were also liquidated.
I agree with Dr. Giraldi that these historical incidents, factual or exaggerated, have been exploited to create “get out of jail free cards” for Israeli actions that too closely resemble proven Nazi crimes. Gaza is a sort of ghetto-concentration camp reminiscent of documented Nazi crimes in Poland and elsewhere. Whatever the extent the facts fully support the received view, I agree with the implication that feelings of guilt for Nazi excesses were central to the creation of Israel and think that the Finkelstein book mentioned is a valuable corrective.
I also find it outrageous that any sort of questioning or revisionism is considered taboo despite the traditional existence of constitutional guarantees of free speech, which have been seriously curtailed in recent years. I also deplore identity politics and forced political correctness, recalling George Carlin’s view that political correctness was nothing more than polite fascism As for Dr. Latson, he obviously made a serious mistake in the present environment and in the context of events at his school, and I am sure he will be sacked. If traditional rule of law still obtained he would probably be able to continue on as a teacher, but, recalling my studies of the rise of fascism, a new version of it appears to have gradually developed in the “west” during the last 30 years or so.
So encountering an old woman with a number tattoo proves Nazis exterminated Jews? Not that there were prisoners of war, but that Jews were systematically slaughtered?Wow, there's a logical leap of faith ...As far as Ph.D. research, I'm not sure it has the cachet you think it does.Replies: @turtle, @Beefcake the Mighty
From my Ph. D. research and seeing survivors with tattoos I am convinced that the Nazi regime did engage in exterminations
Only if by "liquidated" you mean died of starvation and disease because food and medical care were inadequate. German logistics in the winter of 1941 were famously a nightmare: if the Wehrmacht couldn't even supply their own troops with adequate winter gear, it's no surprise EPWs fared worse. Though the number of victims you cite is too high. It comes ultimately from the book Keine Kameraden by one Christian Streit, who is often quoted uncritically by mainstream historians who won't (or can't, if they don't read German) check how he actually derived his figures. In fact, he inflates them quite a bit.Even so, many hundreds of thousands did die. And this, of course, is still a real tragedy. But it was not an intentional genocide, any more than the starvation of even more millions of Germans and Japanese by the Allies after the war. And the Allies didn't have the excuse that they were fighting history's biggest land war while their victims starved in peacetime. See the convincing studies by Alfred De Zayas, most of which have been translated to English, and Stalin's War of Annihilation by Joachim Hoffmann, which our host Ron Unz mentions in his American Pravda series.Replies: @Jacques Sheete, @Hippopotamusdrome
Over 3 Million Soviet POW’s were also liquidated in Nazi camps and hundreds of thousands of other non-Jewish people were also liquidated.
Seeing survivors is evidence of extermination. Maybe we have different definitions of the words "survive" and "exterminate".
From my Ph. D. research and seeing survivors with tattoos I am convinced that the Nazi regime did engage in exterminations
Somehow the standards of evidence become lower in the minds of holocaust cultists, by dint of the scale. You'd think it would be the other way around; that proving 1k people were killed would require 1k times as much evidence as proving 1 person was killed, so to speak, but it doesn't.E.g., in court you can't use the fact that someone has gone missing as "proof" they've been murdered. Generally speaking, if you can't prove a person is dead, you can't try someone for his murder, at least, not in an American court. You need enough of a body (a torso without a head; a head without a torso; a heart; etc) to prove death, or enough remains of one to prove death, or video recording of his death, etc.This is, at least in part, precisely to prevent some (((asshole))) from faking his own death and benefiting from the deed, from punishing someone for a capital crime that hasn't even been proven to have occurred, and to prevent people from being punished for "murdering" people who have simply left in secret (moving in the dark of night is certainly something Jews are no stranger to, historically speaking).But for the holocaust myth, the situation is reversed; since you're "proving" millions died, you don't need any evidence that anyone died at all.
From my Ph. D. research and seeing survivors with tattoos I am convinced that the Nazi regime did engage in exterminations, but I know that Jewish people were not the only targets. The actual number exterminated is open to interpretation, but a great many were obviously exterminated. Proof that something happened can be seen in comparisons of the ethnic makeup of territories before and after Nazi occupation. Over 3 Million Soviet POW’s were also liquidated in Nazi camps and hundreds of thousands of other non-Jewish people were also liquidated.
I love the "fascism" thing because as soon as you use that word, you've conceded that you are fighting a losing, rear-guard action. To choose "fascism" as epithet when "communism" is appropriate is to admit that you are in fact living under a communist or communist-adjacent regime, and have to use communist lingo and epithets to get through to the sheep.
recalling George Carlin’s view that political correctness was nothing more than polite fascism
Is the existence of people with tattoos not evidence AGAINST the extermination story? I am not referring only to the fact of people "surviving" rather than being exterminated, but to the tattoos themselves. Why would the Germans tattoo people who were on their way to gas chambers?
and seeing survivors with tattoos I am convinced that the Nazi regime did engage in exterminations
While I think Brabantian (No. 15) has a real grasp on the deal which resulted in Mueller not mounting his expected attack on Trump, I think Whitney is also right that Trump agreed to let the neocons run his foreign policy so the deep state would drop its coup attempt. The question is will Trump let his original “dangerous” common sense take control or is he too much a part of the Zionist power structure on, for instance, Iran and Syria.
I agree with animalogic’s take and find political correctness, cultural marxism, or whatever you call it a stalking horse for Orwellian thought control. The tern political correctness, I believe, was associated with the Stalinist era, thus perhaps the basis of and link to the term “cultural marxism”. I encountered the term “politisch Korrekt” extensively when I combed through 1950s and 1960s East German propaganda archives in doing a doctoral dissertation in the early ’90s. That helped educate me to the odious influence of political correctness, and I’ve always detested those trying to limit the scope of free speech. As the lead article indicates, it only partially works anyway. Thus, a spazz becomes a scopey.
I appreciate this reminder about the Iraq war, which, because its instigators were never held accountable, has led to the dire situation we are in now. Paraphrasing Talleyrand, I believe, it was not only criminal but stupid.
So does the perpetrator go to women’s prison or men’s prison?
This is a great article which effectively exposes Sanders as being fatally compromised by his role as Clinton lackey after the evidence emerged that the party engaged in fraud securing the predicted result. I also fully endorse Hooch’s response to the commentary. Great job on both counts.
Sanders in later years has become more willing to give up principle to be considered acceptable. His acceptance of most of the imperialist viewpoint and the relative cowardice revealed by his eagerness not only to campaign, but to campaign strongly for the establishment candidate in 2016 whose apparatus had defrauded him of the nomination in 2016 reveals his limitations as just one more member of the corrupt power structure which is a blight on the US and, through it, the world.
In light of the various crimes and ethnic cleansing engaged in by the Israeli regime, if they succeed in defining anti-zionism as “anti-semitism” according to the traditional meaning of anti Jewish prejudice, then there is the major risk of blowback to the Jewish population, since it carries the risk of all Jews being tarred with the crimes of the Israeli regime. If one uses the phrase “anti-semitism” with a non-traditional but perhaps more accurate definition to mean actions taken against any and all semitic groups rather than the traditional application of the term exclusively to those of the Jewish faith, bearing in mind that those speaking Arabic or Aramaic also can be considered “semitic” then the Israeli state can be described as the world’s leading purveyor of anti-semitism.
The implications of this are enormous. This is the first time I’ve seen it wrapped up in a single article.
I share Mr. Giraldi’s lack of faith in the legal system, which has already entered the post rule of law era. I also agree that treason and corruption have removed the last vestiges of legitimacy from the yankee imperium, which is the dog being wagged by the corrupt, fascist Israeli tail.
As is noted in the article, it is easier to lopakokov than to addadictomy. It’s all a load of absurd odious bollocks, including those removed in the process. It is all part of the accelerating debasement of western culture.
The reason there are real casualties in France is that there is a real resistance, not a soi-disant anti-fascist fascist resistance.
I am impressed with how this writer has gradually emerged as a significant effective commentator based on his experience and his intelligent way of evaluating the real as opposed to propaganda facts. Early on, he still accepted some elements of the official narrative that he was not directly confronting, but he has quickly outgrown this weakness as he effectively rebuts more and more of the official ‘facts’ in exposes such as this one.
The review is excellent. Tucker Carlson is the best person now on mainstream TV news broadcasting.
While we're setting low bars, may I also observe that he'd quickly rise above the common run of politician on the national stage, should he desire to make his way there. And as an aside, imagine for a moment the cataclysm which would await anyone who laid siege to the residence of Ta-Nehisi, or Rachel Maddow, or Peter Beinhart, or Jonathan Chait, or well, you get the idea. Unimaginable that it would even happen, much less go completely unpunished.Replies: @Tiny Duck, @Tiny Duck, @IHTG
Tucker Carlson is the best person now on mainstream TV news broadcasting.
I agree with the conclusion implied by the article: Trump has become part of the same structure he opposed in the campaign, and this is a serious mistake.
If this becomes widely known it will fuel antisemitism.
It seems like these facts are likely to increase anti-semitism even against those who don’t deserve to be subjects of prejudice, since this reveals the colonial nature of the Anglosphere.
As an exponent of the real left, not the make-believe yankee democrat version, I would say it looks like some sort of staged bullshit.
I can fully concur with the view of this situation as stated in the article. It reveals the total corruption of all elements of the yankee imperium, those around the deep state and those around Trump.
This article is extremely well done, and is very effective and highly convincing.
While I am sure that the historical evidence really supports the allegations about the organised Nazi murder of Jews, I also know that the number of others murdered by the Nazi regime equalled or exceeded those who happened to be Jewish. Otherwise, I fully agree with the Saker’s statement and feel that the whole antisemitism accusation thing will soon lead to a major backlash which will in fact be anti-semitic, particularly against “professional” pro-Israeli elements. The fact that this is itself being propagated in part to defend pro-war demands and even war crimes will intensify this wave, as well as the fact that, as indicated, the entire effort is being mounted against those who recognize reality and the dangerous implications of what is being propagated and the almost unlimited power of those doing the propagation.
Please share with us the sources, context and nature of the "historical evidence" that is the foundation for your certainty.Is it a vague belief derived from the zeitgeist; a body of knowledge acquired via mass media/TV/movies, or the result of study in primary and secondary documents and histories?
While I am sure that the historical evidence really supports the allegations about the organised Nazi murder of Jews,
Disregarding Jew-owned, Jew-monitored, Jew-edited Wikipedia, please provide historical evidence supporting organized Nazis murder of Jews. Take all the time you need.Replies: @APilgrim
the historical evidence really supports the allegations about the organised Nazi murder of Jews,
While I certainly agree with Johnny Rottenborough that Israel is more damaging and dangerous, one cannot gainsay the odium of the Saudi regime and, in my view, lobbyists operating for them like Lampkin mentioned in the article are acting for war criminals and may themselves be liable. You also can’t fully separate Israel and the Saudis, since they seem to have taken them on as a destabilising factor to enable the Israelis to remain unchallenged in the Middle East.
Phil (#11) has it right. Trump has largely sold out to the neocon deep state element and is largely following their policies, perhaps because as an amateur he was easily convinced by the fact all of the so-called grownups seemed to favour the hardline imperial policy, or perhaps because he vainly hopes that by following the neocon policies it will make them ease up on him. It won’t because by caving in he only reveals his weakness. His early failure was in allowing himself to be pressured to get rid of General Flynn, known for his opposition to arming the jihadi element in Syria and elsewhere, though he had Trump’s blindspot on Iran. Workingclass (#7) also has it right: the Russia-Chinese alliance was already in place in 2016 as a result of the yankees throwing their weight around in the Ukraine and on absurd sanctions.
In a way, Trump’s lack of diplomatic finesse, by strengthening the Chinese-Russian alliance and making it more likely that satellites may desert the Nato “Atlantacist” fold, by weakening yankee dominance is probably a good thing for everywhere else. Though things can’t get much worse, I think this would have occurred sooner had the harpy won, and the weakening of the US position due to diplomatic incompetency may make things not quite as bad for the rest of the world.
A website needs to list all of the books banned by amazon and provide a means for their dissemination. Much like the Catholic Church’s banned index, it should become a badge of honour to be banned by this organization. Such private arbiters have become much too powerful in this technological age, and,in the end, the technology may end up being a net negative. Memory holes seem to be the order of the day.
Woodward has been an establishment shill toeing the official line for decades.
While I am convinced that the Nazis did single out the Jews for extermination based on evidence I discovered in my career as a historian, I accept that as a parallel effort the Nazis cooperated with zionist founders of Israel and that a number of the survivors of the Nazi extermination effort were as a result of purchase. This was notable in Hungary. I also find convincing that the Israeli Mossad was the prime mover in the 9/11 affair, though more parts of the official story may be true than the truthers would have us believe, i.e, the Israelis likely used Arabs they had coopted as the plane highjackers. The actual details are less important than the essential truth that the Mossad likely steered the effort and we are still living with the neocon takeover which to this day is threatening our future existence, so this article is essentially correct even if we can’t fully reconstruct factual details. I also concur with Mr. Unz that a government conspiracy to create the false flag, as has been alleged by many, is unbelievable while some form of controlled Mossad operation is the most likely explanation. If the belief in this becomes widespread, then this becomes extremely dangerous for the establishment and its Israeli minders because the implications of this are beyond any series of events which has ever occurred.
It’s Orwell on steroids. On the 17th anniversary of permanent warfare against jihadi elements, the new plan is to start a war, potentially nuclear, on behalf of jihadi elements. Russia and Syria should respond by cooling off on the attack on Idlib for the moment, but the asymmetrical response by Russia should be to cut off air routes to the yankee garrison in Afghanistan. A defeat of the yankee war machine there should preoccupy them for long enough for the Syria thing to be cleared up. If the US makes an attack on Syrian, Iranian or Russian forces based on this proven false flag, then, Hezbollah should respond by lobbing a few missiles at the Dimona plant. This creates a fukushima-like situation, and will cost a lot of money to resolve. Asymmetrical responses are what is necessary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrHoMSRZOS4
As the Unabomber Ted Kazinsky might say, technology affects everything and society gets further and further away from the natural order. Only an industrial society would postpone marriage and family formation long past a biologically appropriate age in order to spend the youth’s most productive years learning to run the machines and push the paperwork. Feeding the machine becomes more important that reproducing the race; the machines become more important than the biology. So society will go back and forth between repression and degeneracy as long as it suppresses biology. -Hipster Racist
By the way, I think that Russia should act against the threats against the moves to liquidate the Idlib barbarians by cutting off all air resupply to the yankee garrison in Afghanistan. An embarrassing defeat there would make it more difficult for the yankees to maintain their siege on behalf of the jihadi elements in Syria. This would be a classic asymetrical response, and would be one that averts nuclear war. If the yankees mount any kind of an attack on Syria, then Hamas ought to send missiles to blow up the Dimona nuclear installation in Israel. This would create Fukushima-like conditions there and perhaps neutralize to some extent the core of the neocon initiative.
Orwell’s 1984 featured perpetual wars and changes of fronts aided by memory holes. While Stalinism, itself went by the boards, as Orwell sort of predicted, the same tactics became characteristic of Oceania, his name for the anglophone world in the novel. Now we have a threatened possible nuclear war to defend the same raghead elements credited with the 9/11 attacks. In seventeen years we have gone from perpetual war against the raghead element to perpetual war, up to and including extinction, to be engaged in on behalf of the same barbarous elements. If we survive this, historians, or at least those independent of the international “Oceania” deep state structure, will marvel that we came so close to extinction by fighting for the same barbarians which were the rationale of starting perpetual war in the first place.
With Iraq’s infrastructure and stability destroyed by years of yankee intervention, perhaps Basra should join neighbouring Khuzistan (which also speaks Arabic but is predominantly Shia) by demanding to join Iran.
Ronnie, London Bob, and John Helmer are more trustworthy than those attempting to put it on Russia. Why did it take six months for this information to leak out unless it is a planned leak to revive a failing narrative? If the stuff is so dangerous, why didn’t anybody else among the guests and employees of the purported hotel suffer any ill effects? Meanwhile, the first photos with what certainly looks like exactly the same corridor and stamped at exactly the same time showing the supposed suspects exposed the fraudulency of the story already. (the claim that there could be two corridors exactly the same in all details was developed as an excuse to buttress a narrative exposed by the date-time stamp being exactly the same to the second on the two photographs.)
Analysis of thousands of hours of CCTV. Discovering the details of the suspects' route and the identities they used for travel. Conducting an investigation, rather than jumping to conclusions.
Why did it take six months for this information to leak out unless it is a planned leak to revive a failing narrative?
The concentration found in the hotel was extremely low.
If the stuff is so dangerous, why didn’t anybody else among the guests and employees of the purported hotel suffer any ill effects?
There is a lengthy discussion in the comments on Craig Murray's post The Impossible Photo. One commenter provides this URL from Google Streetview showing gates at Gatwick airport:https://www.google.com/maps/@51.1570389,-0.1626798,2a,75y,190.43h,71.01t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbDP9F6o9-mzp9-7ExjG-Lg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656Craig Murray himself acknowledges that his post "The Impossible Photo" was a mistake. He has added there:
the claim that there could be two corridors exactly the same in all details was developed as an excuse to buttress a narrative exposed by the date-time stamp being exactly the same to the second on the two photographs.
I am prepared to acknowledge that, given the gate design, they could have passed through different gates in exact synchronicity and this may be a red herring. I am leaving this post up here as it is good to acknowledge mistakes.
I can see a backlash developing from these phony accusations of anti-semitism, particularly since the pro-Israeli types are also pro-war. They become scapegoats if the war they desire occurs and causes serious damage, a major likelihood in the nuclear age.
We have to look at things in their present perspective. Mr. Keverich’s view is more accurate based on where we are and who is backing calls for intervention. It is all more backing of the jihadi element to contain China, and supporting outside intervention will lead to another failed state. The yankee imperium is the greatest enemy of stability and civilization now going and they always support the most backward or corrupt elements.
Corbyn has to resist the temptation to give way to them. He is right on the Palestinian issue, and, since the Palestinians are 100 % semites (though “anti-semitism” has been appropriated to mean anti-Jewish most Jewish emigrants from Europe have considerable non-semitic blood mixed in) the real anti-semites here appear to be the Israeli element bent on eliminating the Palestinians. The Gaza strip is a ghetto operated in a similar manner to how the Nazis operated the ghettoes in occupied Poland (though without the Auschwitz end game up to now). The thing is, if Corbyn stands up to this, in my view, his supporters will fully back him up. In my view, the Israelis are risking real anti-Israeli blowback which could resurrect evils buried with the collapse of the Nazi regime. Indeed, the way they are acting on this and other related issues, threatening those who criticise them in any fashion seems to be providing ex post facto justifications of the most absurd propaganda the Nazis put forward during that era.
I’ve highly respected Ms. Johnstone since I read her book on the corruption represented by the Clintons. What is really at stake here is whether or not corruption, represented by the meddling yankee imperium and oligarchs like Khodorovsky, Browder, and those operating in yankeeland like Bezos, Soros and those Winer represents, shall triumph. Unfortunately the bad guys are running the show everywhere the yankee imperium dominates. These are more dangerous times than the past, when, for example, the Nazi regime and Stalinism held sway over broad areas. Technology has become more dangerous and extinction-threatening. The claim of world domination remains the link between those systems and the odious globalist imperium of the present day.
The oldest references I’ve seen to the term “politically correct” was when I was researching my dissertation on East German propaganda, largely true, concerning Nazi holdovers emerging in the postwar West German state. East German archives of the ’50s and ’60s often referred to “politisch korrekt” viewpoints. I’ve since heard that the term originated in Stalinist discourse prior to WWII.
What it and identity politics now is is a sort of officially sanctioned proscription of free speech by the power structure which thereby reveals its essentially dictatorial nature. I think Tommy Robinson and his associates are exercising restraint on this issue. I think that mob vigilante violence is justified against these “groomers” and, though I know it would be illegal and a slippery slope since mistakes are likely to be made, I think this would be understandable and may be an end result if the politically correct fascist element continues to have its way in Britain and elsewhere. I think a line should be drawn against this alien barbarism.
This post brings up a number of issues:
First, Freeland is the External Affairs Minister in all likelihood because Trudeau in January 2017 bowed to the Anglo-American spy imperium by replacing Stephane Dion, former Liberal Party leader and an effective diplomat and serious person, with Freeland, whose claim to fame was that she was a professional Ukrainian who not only does not disavow her Ukrainian Nazi collaborator grandfather, Mihailo Chomiak, but who mirrors his anti-Russian viewpoint. Chomiak was the editor of the major Nazi Ukrainian propaganda newspaper during the Third Reich.
Second, only recently Trudeau, Freeland and the Canadian government agreed to resettle a large number of “White Helmets” to Canada. Bear in mind that these have been the propaganda speerhead of the jihadi mercenaries working for the yankee imperium to destabilize the Syrian government and replace it with a barbaric Islamic regime.
Third, for whatever reason, perhaps because Trump, rather than being helpful to a Canadian regime which has acted as a client state has started trade wars, Trudeau and Freeland have decided to draw the line on support for Saudi barbarism. Perhaps they should also rescind their offer to settle the quisling Syrian jihadi element in Canada. After all, similar settlements of raghead mercenaries, this time by Britain in Manchester, led to terrorist acts. After all, Canada had its own recent terrorist incident in the Danforth road district of Toronto recently. As for the Saudis withdrawing 15,000 students from Canadian universities, I respond with the old adage “good riddance to bad rubbish.”
I make this comment in general support of Mr. Buchanan’s viewpoint.
All of this seems profoundly depressing, but it appears to be how things are. I was disappointed by Trump’s efforts to cave into the deep state on his statements. The fact he can’t even control his justice ministry reveals his weakness. I’m of the view history shows that once spy agencies reach a critical mass in power they become the absolute rulers of a structure and the rule of law becomes a facade, then is sidelined completely.
I forgot to include this in my response, but Publius Tacitus on Sic Semper Tyrannis (turcopolier.typepad.com: Col Lang’s website, exposes the absurdity and odium of the Steele dossier point by point and reveals it for what it was: an attempted spook led deep state coup to ensure Trump was sidelined. The ongoing effort has been a direct outgrowth of this, and, whatever one thinks of Trump, the success of such an extra-legal effort would spell the irrevocable end of representative law based government in the US state. In my view, Trump’s efforts to defend himself has resulted in many of the rumours of war and much of the anti-Russian stuff including pro el qaeda stuff in Syria. Trump’s regime has also had to rely much more than it would have on Israeli backing to somewhat neutralize the neocons. This has its own doleful results, including the absurd anti-Iranian campaign.
It seems to me that the house filing of the impeachment resolutions along with this gives Trump the needed cover to withstand the media firestorm which will, of course, occur if and when he decides to pull the trigger on getting rid of his disloyal assistant attorney general and ending the Mueller witchhunt farce. He also should get rid of Sessions, who failed to stand up for the administration because the secret facts showing the farcical nature of what they were going on were there and should have been known to the leadership of the department. If Trump can’t get a replacement confirmed, he should go with a caretaker from the lower levels until he can. This information also gives him the cover to pardon everybody persecuted by the Mueller witchhunt. The sooner he acts the better. While Trump is no hero, those attacking him are a fascist neocon cabal.
Mueller is guilty of sedition, which I’m not sure is a crime according to actual contemporary law, in that he sought through this fraudulent indictment, to prevent Trump coming to any understanding with Russia. He is also guilty of treason to civilization, and our continued existence, since war would be a likely outcome of his intent. In any event, he is totally disloyal to the government theoretically employing him and should be immediately dismissed along with the people responsible for his appointment. The corrupt propaganda press can’t call him anything they are not already calling him. He should take action now, and Mueller and Rosenstein should be investigated for crimes they have committed.
This is a frightening, accurate commentary on what we face as a result of an unaccountable power structure resorting to any and all means to retain power which, if this structure continues to exercise it, will lead to our extinction.
While Trump now seems to be standing his ground, he followed bad advice in making any effort to backtrack against the fascist lamestream media. He is up against a threatening regime and has act accordingly. He should also simply terminate the Mueller extra-legal witchhunt and sack the disloyal leadership of his justice department.
It is certainly thought provoking. The developments over the last fifty years or so lend credence to these speculations.
The book is something everybody should see and evaluate. I suspect that it is largely true, and I appreciate Mr. Unz for providing easy access to it. I hope this posting remains easily accessible for a long time, since there is a lot there to digest in the book and, as an old man, I’m not used to accessing booklength stuff in this sort of format.
All of this seems pretty interesting and completes my suppositions as to what happened to JFK and RFK and who was responsible and, perhaps even more importantly, who benefited “cui bono” a usual criterion in determined who instigated a murder.
I also have noticed Napoletano’s cleaving to the establishment line lately. The real question is, if you have a sort of gestapo (the term is a German abbreviation which simply means secret state police: geheime Staatspolizei), can the government be independent of such an institution. It seems to me that the real questions are, can we be independent of a gestapo organization, and can the rule of law co-exist with a secret police agency. These have been the big issues presented by the FBI since the J. Edgar Hoover era, which began about 99 years ago when he was a bigwig in the “Bureau of Investigation” during the post-Great War red scare of 1918-20. He developed the FBI along those lines in the 1920s and after and it has been undermining the rule of law since that time, to the extent now that the rule of law no longer really obtains in the yankee imperium.
The Red Tory thing is interesting. I can see what “anon” (comment No. 5) is driving at, though the use of the word fascism is freighted with the eventual barbaric outcome of the Nazi project, as well as the outgrowths of western guilt for allowing it to proceed which in many instances such as political correctness and toleration of Nazi-like tactics by descendents of Nazi victims, have resulted in a new version of fascism.
It is interesting to note that the anti-system parties of Europe, such as those in control in Hungary and Austria, seem to take more leftwing positions on issues other than immigration than sell-out former Socialist parties which have degenerated into the politically correct portion of the anti-russian neo-liberal centre. Even the term “anti-system” is associated with the Nazi movement during Weimar but fits with the situation in the western world today. Thus, Le Pen, Orban and the Austrian government are more reliable at protecting workers’ rights than the sell-out centre, and the cinque stelle (I hope I’m not that far off in spelling) can coalesce with the Lega, which also takes positions to the left of the corrupt centre in areas other than immigration. On immigration itself, here in Canada or in the US where everybody is eventually an immigrant other than the first nation remnant, it is hard to be totally anti-immigrant, but it is understandable in Europe where historic ethnicities are in some danger and where the results of the destabilisation of Africa and the Middle East by the yankee imperium and the Israelis is the root cause of the immigration problem.
As a final statement, I agree with the writer and say mea culpa mea maxima culpa as far as his anti or really pro- Putin-Nazi viewpoint is expressed.
If Trump’s actions lead to the breakup of the yankee imperial system, it is all to the good. I’m not sure autarchy could work because the last 50 years of globalism have hollowed out the US industrial structure and the system has grown even more corrupt locally as it has globalized. I think Trump’s motives are actually good, though he doesn’t really have a workable program to restore the US to pre-imperial success. The system he is destabilizing is far more odious than the author, whom I have agreed with in other instances, lets on.
Villaragosa revealed himself to be a typical neoliberal sellout as mayor of LA over 10 years ago. Although I’ve been out of California 10 years and haven’t followed things there very closely, it is no surprise to me that his campaign tanked, especially since Newsom, according to what little I knew from my perch in Canada, was apparently the anointed candidate of the party structure.
If this is true, and unfortunately it appears to be, the US is aiding and abetting what is probably the most significant war crime of the 21st century. The official opposition, meanwhile, is, if anything, even more keen on this. It is the final failure of “responsibility to protect” type interventions, the proof of which is the fact this is a bipartisan policy which was started under Obama. The long term result of the Nazi regime, creation of Israel as a result in large part of western guilt for Nazi crimes, meanwhile is indirectly fueling this, since Israel has an unofficial alliance with the Saudi barbarians and their emirate allies. The fact is, the Russians are supporting the civilised element in the middle east while the yankees, their satellites, and their controlling influence, are backing the wahabi barbarians.
This writer, a retired military officer whose son died in service to the yankee imperium seems to have as good a grasp as any if not a better grasp than any about the nature of the yankee system of permanent war.
The two party “uniparty” is alive and well. In fact, while the party’s supporters still may include self- described “leftists” the party itself has gone further right than the traditionally rightwing GOP. The dual party structure relies on the “Democrats” to gut “entitlements”, that is Social Security or Medicare. It was the “Democrats” who put in Obamacare, which mandated people to spend an arm and a leg on crappy medical insurance the cost of which was massively inflated which they could only use when they had spent way more than average on medical bills. Meanwhile it was the democrats’ harpy candidate who proposed a no-fly zone in Syria on behalf of raghead mercenaries hired by the yankee imperium. While Trump has largely caved in to the deep state, in part perhaps because of the pressure applied by the phony deep state witch hunt taking over the “justice” department of the yankee regime, we know what the democrats, exponents of the fraudulent “Russia-gate” stories, now espouse: a new cold war far more dangerous than the old one. Meanwhile, the commercial media in the US and satellite countries, has degenerated into a Goebbels-like propaganda apparat. Trump’s clumsiness actually may have the accidental salutary effect of enabling the satellite countries to slip the yankee leash, at least to some extent. The situation brought about by this unprecedented two faction version of fascism is profoundly depressing, in addition to being seriously dangerous.
Perhaps an unintended consequence of this attempted shakedown of Poland supported apparently by the AIPAC controlled yankee power structure will be for Poland to take a more realistic view of which is the greater threat, Russia or the yankee imperium. Poland going along with Hungary and the Czech and Slovak republics, plus Austria would create a significant barrier to the EU acting as a Warsaw Pact on steroids for the yankee imperium. Since Poland has a boundary with Belorussia, allied with Russia proper, this could create a potentially serious leak in the European vassal status. Hopefully this new effort will open the eyes of the Polish government, but their record up to now has been to act as one of the most subservient to yankee power of the European states.
This would be a very good outcome not just for Poland, but for the EU in general. Brussels might also get the message that the public in Western EU are thinking along the same lines.Replies: @Momus
Perhaps an unintended consequence of this attempted shakedown of Poland supported apparently by the AIPAC controlled yankee power structure will be for Poland to take a more realistic view of which is the greater threat, Russia or the yankee imperium. Poland going along with Hungary and the Czech and Slovak republics, plus Austria would create a significant barrier to the EU acting as a Warsaw Pact on steroids for the yankee imperium.
I agree. I can see this as a scenario, and Mr. Whitney also is, unfortunately, accurate about both Obamas.
Mr. Hopkins’ article is an effective, accurate description of why and how things have declined into a sort of soft fascism during the last 40 years or so in particular.
It would be extremely politically correct and would be excoriated, of course, but this creates an opening for a presidential campaign based on the slogan “no more Jewish wars.” All it takes is somebody with the courage to go all out against neoliberalism and political correctness. Unfortunately, the history of the Nazi regime is still enabling the Israelis to wag the yankee dog and, while aping Nazi barbarism, still get a free pass for their own war crimes while inciting the yankee regime to be a world-wide dangerous bully, the volume of whose crimes (consider Yemen where a massive famine killing millions is likely) is approaching the benchmark set by the Nazi regime.
As indicated by the facts of the article, the payoff of Israeli Trump supporters was a major rationale for his Iran policy change. Unfortunately, it is the same imperialist crap. I think the Chinese ought to provide the Iranians with nuclear weapons to checkmate the zionist crowd. A missile hitting an Israeli nuclear reactor is another threat. If the sanctions, as is likely, lead to blowback damaging the yankee economy, I think the scapegoats will be obvious, as they will be if a war breaks out and serious consequences occur, provided they are not serious enough to eliminate our survival.
Since so many proponents of permanent warfare, including challenging nuclear powers such as Russia, seem to be more wedded to the Israeli position than representing the US interest, and so many of these proponents are Jews, this is creating a backlash leading to anti-semitic pronouncements.
Trump needs to shut it down. I fully concur with this view. Let the fight come out in the open, and let the structure be attacked directly. If this succeeds, the fascist oligarchy will take complete control, that is, if it hasn’t already.
Perhaps the judge in the Manafort case making the demand that the regime disclose Rosenstein’s memo giving Mueller his charter for the fishing expedition is a jumping off point to grow some cojones and simply terminate this whole farce. Mueller should himself be facing jail rather than attempting to put people in it.
I agree fully and think that Trump should go further and announce that Sessions, Rosenstein, and the entire Mueller crew are simply “fired.” He should also join Manafort’s suit questioning the legality of the whole operation. Naturally the media, the deep state’s propaganda ministry, will create a firestorm, but they should then be called out for sedition and let the chips fall where they may.
How is that different than now?
Naturally the media, the deep state’s propaganda ministry, will create a firestorm,...
Bad advice.No the point is that Mueller has come up empty. The closest thing to "collusion" with some "foreign power"--outside of all the typical Israel bowing and scraping--was the Hillary campaign contracting with the ex-MI6 operative Christopher Steele to get the Russian dirt on Trump and Steele contacting Russian spies for that dirt.Trump should just make a speech to the nation.
I agree fully and think that Trump should go further and announce that Sessions, Rosenstein, and the entire Mueller crew are simply “fired.”
This is an excellent article accurately stating the fact situation. It is particularly dangerous because the anti-Russian spin of the witchhunt could lead to armageddon and makes it extremely difficult or impossible for Trump to follow the foreign policy he said he would in the campaign. By eliminating Flynn, Trump’s national security adviser who made enemies of the deep state by indicating it was dangerous to aid the raghead element in Syria militarily, the witchhunt paved the way eventually for Trump to accept the Bolton appointment, though admittedly that appointment shows that Trump must not be sure enough himself of what he should do.
Trump needs to take action and shut it down himself. He needs to sack Sessions and Rosenstein and terminate Mueller. The next person in line at the yankee justice ministry then needs to go after Comey, the Clintons, Rosenstein, and the deep state actors. Naturally there will be a media firestorm since it acts as the propaganda ministry of the deep state. Trump needs to boldly indicate that what is involved is sedition and stick to the message. People think this would lead to impeachment, but I suspect that Trump would gain public backing by boldly fighting them other than merely through internet tweets. If he doesn’t take the initiative, he’ll be dragged down by the extra-legal system masquerading in the US as the legal system.
This baldly states fundamental truths which have to be stated, but which you won’t see in the commercial media, which is part of the military fascist state which has gradually developed over time as is hinted at in this article.
The hostile takeover of the democratic party is complete. They are not only traitors to their erstwhile supporters, their history of backing war on behalf of the jihadi raghead element makes them traitors to civilization itself. Their threats to Russia as implied by literature such as “Russian Roulette” by journalists associated with the corrupt modern policy indicates treason to survival itself. All that are left is a historically regressive dangerous party and one that, post hostile takeover, has been emblematic of the most dangerous form of fascism in history, since the logical endpoint of their claim on absolute control and hatred of any country resisting this claim, including one with a full panoply of nuclear weapons and the ability to use them is indeed the end of everything.
It means a lot less, but they have totally sold out on the former elements of party doctrine which favoured the working class and more general populace. Obamacare rather than socialized medicine reveals the extent of this sellout. They have indeed become more dangerous than the republicans, which still have an anti-war wing. This entire political, media, and spy system is a threat to our continued existence.