If they wanted the North American culture to remain mono,

They shouldn’t have brought the African anti-enthusiasts to work pro-bono,

To this day, that foolish undertaking remains the biggest no-no,

And how the hell are they gonna fix that, I really donno.

Let me try to explain why the Jews seem to be pro-immigration, pro-multiculturalism and pro-destruction of the west. It’s all based on history, really.

In the past, the Jews were the favorite undesirables in the west, subject to pogromization, discrimination and holocaustization. Now the Jews think, that by encouraging the west to import individuals across the ethnic spectrum, who are more undesirable than them – the Jews, they will be safe.

It’s kind of logical and foolish at the same time. True, some of the new immigrants are way more undesirable then the Jews, but the Jews will always hold a special place in the hearts of the true bigots, because of historical nostalgia.

Even if the west starts to import aliens (actually if this happens, the aliens will probably impose themselves without even asking the west for permission to land), anyway, even if the aliens from outer space start settling in the west – the Jews will still be the original and favorite undesirables.

The Jewish support for non-white immigration is contra-intuitive, because the newcomers will not side with them to form some sort of oppressed brotherhood, Jews will be viewed as one of the fools who allowed non-white immigration and who should be replaced together with the other white fools who let them in.

One of the main reasons the so called “communism” – socialism really – collapsed, is because they got everything wrong. They were talking some nonsense about class struggle between the rich people and the poor. They even called the rich people “oppressors”.

Now, why would the rich people be oppressors? They are nice folks, they give employment to some questionable characters who might otherwise be homeless and destitute if it wasn’t for the kindness of the rich people.

As a matter of fact, in order to teach them a lesson about who is really oppressor and intolerant, the rich elites of the time brought in from Africa some black interns – who were unpaid at first, just so the real oppressors -the deplorables wouldn’t feel their existence being threatened by some unfair paid competition from Africa.

You see, the intent was always to create a multiracial and multicultural paradise, but the rich elites wanted to do it gradually, in order to integrate the African interns seamlessly into the futuristic society where everybody will be equal.

The real oppressors in capitalism – otherwise known by its fancy name “democracy” were never the rich people, but the intolerant rednecks, so in order to teach them a lesson, the clever rich folks brought in some blacknecks, to show who is really intolerant and oppressive.

This clever scheme continues to this day, by bringing from the 3rrd world. more and more diverse color of necks, the rich elites want to take the pressure off of themselves as being “oppressors” and point the finger at those who really need to learn a thing or two about tolerance, liberalism and progressiveness.

Kudos to the elites, I think they got this whole thing right, and if the deplorables keep resisting, one day they will be completely replaced by the equalizers from the third world, with the degenerate elites being replaced themselves only a short time after, by their former thirdworld charges.

I think John Lennon summed it up the best: “Middle east, crazy beast, rock ‘n rollers sing for peace”. Nothing good ever comes from the Middle East. The 3 religions that sprung from that cursed place should be called the 3 terrors – as opposed to the 3 tenors who at least had some pleasant effects on the ear, rather than each of the 3 terrors whose main preoccupation is delivering messages of hate for the other 2 less talented religions.

I see a CIA hand in this one. They must have encouraged that nutcase Erdogan to help his Islamic brothers. For what purpose?

Turkey has been drifting away from NATO lately, with purchase of Russian weapons – thus threatening the sole purpose of NATO existence.

Remember, NATO is not a military alliance anymore. It’s a protection racket for the US. How many members has NATO already – 98? If you demand that each one of them spend 2% of their GDP on mostly crappy US weapons, you can ensure that the US economy is chugging away solely on arms sales, even if the rest of the economy is in the doldrums.

US today is somewhat similar to USSR – in the pre-collapse days – the only branch of the economy that’s performing well is the arms manufacturing – which they are not allowed to outsource to China for strategic reasons.

Turkey buying Russian weapons threatens the core purpose of NATO existence – making money for US. Throwing a wrench into Russia-Turkey rapprochement brings Turkey back into the line-up of NATO goods consumers and ensures continuity of the protection racket indefinitely.

Croats were the earliest champions for Yugoslavia. Knowing that they’ll need the military muscle of the Serbs to free them from Austro-Hungary, and not wanting to be ruled by the Serbs directly, the concocted the idea of Yugoslavia.

In their imaginarium, even though Yugoslavia was supposed to be created by the Serbs – militarily, they – the Croats were supposed to play the most prominent role in governing that country based on the “fact” that they possessed “superior” culture to the Serbs thanks to the lucky coincidence that the Croats were enslaved by Austro-Hungary, as opposed to the Serbs who were enslaved by the inferior Ottoman Turks – but who (the Serbs) nevertheless managed to free themselves from the Ottoman Turks without any help from the Croats.

Bottom line, Croats needed Yugoslavia, Serbs didn’t – in order to realize their dream (or nightmare for some) of nationhood.

Going back a generation, the Croats were far more bloodthirsty than the Serbs you describe. Under the fascist regime of Ante Pavelic, the Croats happily massacred entire villages of Serbs and also like their Nazi buddies, killed off every Gypsy, gay and Jew they could lay their hands on. During the recent troubles attendant upon the breakup of the Yugoslav state, the then leader of the Croats, FranjoTudjman, was in bed with the Vatican and with his Ustasha fascists.
Oddly, during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Serbs and Croats got along quite well. Both peoples speak Serbo-Croatian, but the Croats are Romanists, while the Serbs are of the Orthodox persuasion. Something happened between WWI and the dirty Thirties to create the enmity which continues to this day. Perhaps one of the many erudite posters here can fill us in.

There is no similarity between Bulgarian and Makedonian, they are identical, the same language.

I know. If the Serbs and the Macedonians are brothers – which they are, the Macedonians and Bulgarians are identical twins. As for the Serbian brothers – even siblings can do stupid things, like the Serbs did in the 2nd Balkan war. Totally unforgivable, and for that they deserve the title of honorary Ukrainians.

I am with Stalin on this one, actually. Stalin thought that Macedonia should be part of Bulgaria, based on linguistic and racial similarities.

Macedonia has a lot (everything) in common with Bulgaria, almost nothing in common with Serbia and totally nothing with Greece.

If Greek culture was so dominant and overwhelming to the senses, why it didn’t impose itself on the Slavic newcomers when they settled in present day Macedonia, but it was the other way around – everybody spoke Slavic Macedonian language in ALL of Macedonia until the Balkan wars when the Serbs gifted Macedonia to the Greeks.

I wonder how did that “friendship” came about. Did the Greeks and the Serbs went Greek on each other or what? I mean such love is hard to explain otherwise except the Serbs falling for the Greeks charm.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=go%20greek

Correct, the ethnic Greeks left in Greece are mostly from the Islands or refugees from Turkey, who settled in Greece 100 years ago. People on the mainland are mostly of Slavic descent, especially in the north of Greece

Don’t get me started on this one. Greece claims that’s 98% Greek – practically no minorities. When in reality, probably just barely over half of the population is Greek.

And the stupid Europe allows them to get away with this. I guess as long as you are “democracy” you can get away with murder.

Still, the biggest blame lies with the Serbs – who out of the generosity of their hearts gifted Macedonia to the Greeks, who based on the effort that they put in the Balkan wars shouldn’t have gotten almost anything, let alone 60% of Macedonia.

I believe that the curse of the 2nd Balkan war is haunting the Serbs to this day. Ever since that colossal betrayal of their Slavic brothers – Bulgarians and Macedonians, they had nothing but bad luck, and for what?

What did they got out of their “friendship” with the Greeks? Rent free stay on Corfu during the WW1 – when thousands of them died because their great friends the Greeks, couldn’t, or wouldn’t feed them.

That BS about democracy is all a joke. Europe allows the Greeks to deny the Macedonians the right to speak their language, what the hell, they deny them the right to give their kids Macedonian names. Some democracy is flourishing in Greece and in Europe. It’s all just a pile of BS.

https://www.refworld.org/docid/49749d1841.html

This just to show you what a con job capitalism really is: Apparently there are no genetic differences between races – we are all equal. How humane and generous of them, bestowing us with a judgement of equality from their position of superiority.

But there are genetic differences between rich and poor. Obviously, rich people are genetically superior to the poor, which allows them to justifiably become rich.

When it comes to races (especially the poor underclasses of every race), according to the capitalist elites – they are all blessed with the same genes which allow them to be equally poor.

Capitalism – successfully conning people for over 300 years. One day they’re going to con themselves out of existence.

Here is my theory about races and evolution. According to some anthropologists we all sprung from Africa – some 1 million years ago. That would make the Africans the oldest race.

Based on that logic, they should be the most advanced – they had the most time to develop. Asiatic race is second oldest, and the white Europeans are the new kids on the block – they have been around probably barely 50 000 years – if that. So they should be the least advanced because they had the shortest time to develop – only 50 thousand years.

It seems that there is contradiction there. But there isn’t. Because races evolve one into another, and the oldest one is the one that is going nowhere, because something more advanced already developed out of them.

Take the example of the crocodiles – they are modern day dinosaurs, they’ve been playing the evolution game for millions of years. According to some logic they should be the most advanced creatures on earth, because they had millions of years to develop.

That’s not how it works. I am sure that more advanced species came out of the crocodiles, but they themselves are pretty much the same like they used to be 100 million years ago. Same thing about human evolution, the newer the race is, the more advanced it is.

This new “discovery” that we are all “equal” has nothing to do with science or evolution or whatever. It’s all political. It’s considered a progressive and liberal idea – the part where we are all “equal”.

It’s just an effort by the good old capitalism to prove that by producing such a “progressive” and “liberal” ideas – which represent an evolution of thought – it doesn’t need to evolve itself. It’s a pretty good con.

As long as it produces such an enlightened “ideas”, the good old capitalism can stay as backward as it was on the day it was created.

Unfortunately, in order for something to qualify as an evolution – it has to produce something newer and better. Evolution into degeneracy doesn’t count. It’s not even an evolution, it’s just designed to deflect the attention from the fact that the system is not evolving, it’s stagnating, and in order to prove otherwise, launches degenerate ideas that will try to portray it as “progressive” and “liberal”.

No, it’s the result of the major backstabbing by the Serbs – of the Bulgarians, to make benefit the glorious nation of Greece. Much of the fighting in the 1st Balkan war was done by the Bulgarians and the Serbs, with cameo appearance from the Greeks. The Serbs betrayed everything that a true Slav should stand for – for what? For some Greeks who had some questionable faggoty civilization some 2-3 thousand years ago, and have been freeloading ever since. Go freeload of the Brits, they seem to like you, leave the Slavs alone – but without them you would still be under the Turks – literally, not that you would have mind it – mind you, being Greek and all that.

The left wing – right wing classification never had much substance in US politics. Both parties are deep state parties – primarily concerned with the interests of those with deep pockets. But as it is at the moment – Trump is little bit less deep state than Biden. Why? Because he doesn’t need to be paid by the deep state in order to do their bidding. Biden is a total household servant – the main point of his existence is to serve the interests of the deep state, not of the wider population – especially not the interests of the so called deplorables. This election is not about left wing, right wing. It’s about race. Either the survival instinct is going to kick in, or there is none left and as a result there won’t be any survival, at least not for those of European origin. So your voting for the democrats is voting for the deep state, which means that you are in the shallow end of the pool, – but you’ll still manage to drown, unless you come to your senses and start making some rapid kicking motions, or just simply standing up.

The Austrian degenerate was actually a great protector of capitalism. He went so far as to call himself “socialist” – to fool his adversaries. Then when his project failed, he passed the baton for protectors of capitalism to his Anglo-Saxofon cousins overseas.

Their project looks like it’s going to end in a similar fate as the project of Adi (that’s my affectionate name for Hitler). You see the problem with the capitalism “protectors” is that when they put their favorite stinking baby – capitalism in a protective mode – you can’t tell if it’s a protective mode or self-destructive.

I guess it doesn’t matter – as long as they believe that they are protecting the capitalism. I’ll give some credit to Adi – because he was smarter than the present day protectors – he only used the word “socialism” in order to fake progress. The deep thinkers from the deep state who put the west in deep s*it, went way, way further, they use immigration in order to fake progress. And what a progress it has been, the people of European heritage are teetering on the edge of the abyss, all in the effort to protect that most precious of western possessions – capitalism. Because nothing else matters.

Right, Marxism is destructive and capitalism is constructive. Go check the European countries that were ruled by “Marxism” since WW2 and then compare them to the western European degeneracies.

Which ones preserved their national identities better? Which countries (still) resist the degenerate ideas from the west that the only way you can be “liberal” is to open the floodgates to hell – I mean to immigration. Go take a nap, this conversation is not only too taxing on your brain, but too ubering also.

If US was an MMA ring, which match would the elites rather see: Deplorables vs. Deplorables or Deplorables vs. Adorables? Quite a humanists they are.

If races didn’t exist, they would have to be invented in the US, because race comes very handy for diverting attention from the elites who decided to socially distance themselves from both kinds of deplorables – white and non-white.

The racism issue that they are pushing as a number one agenda is a class struggle within the same class, the resolution of this “injustice” is supposed to come at the expense of the white deplorables.

The white adorables are untouchable, they are the ones driving the social justice crusade because it’s not supposed to come at their expense. It makes sense, because as we know from history, the ancestors of the white deplorables are the ones who started the racial struggle, they are the ones that brought the African hardworking volunteers to America, the elites present and past had nothing to do with it ever. They were preaching racial equality from day one. For them white deplorables are equal to the colored deplorables, and they themselves are exceptional. How much more socialist than that can you get?

I think that Michael Moore is behind all this Covid – 19 disaster. Remember how few years ago he made a movie about the inferiority of the US health care system compared to the one in Cuba? I see a similar modus operandi here. I think that Michael Moore got a wind of the situation where the US government developed a new virus to combat world overpopulation – based on Bill Gates ideas. So Michael Moore decided to take advantage of the situation and outsourced the virus to China – knowing that their health care system is better than that of the US. The idea was to expose the failure of the US health care system – which now competes with India and Brazil for numero uno for worst response to the Covid -19 pandemic.

That’s absolutely right. If you slap your own wife – that’s wrong, but it’s a domestic dispute. If a stranger comes into you home and slaps your wife – that’s million times more wrong. You have the right to pull a gun and shoot the b**tard.

Once upon a time, a polish degenerate went to Pakistan to give the taliban an “inspirational” speech. It involved mentioning “God”. If he was still alive today, I wonder whether he would claim that “God is still on their side” – this time while they are having some philosophical disagreements with the americans.

Video Link

You want me to describe the relationship between your elites and the majority of the Americans?

It’s like this. US elites are like an old geezer who has a young mistress – the Americans – who is not very bright, as a matter of fact she is a bimbo.

For her birthday, her rich old boyfriend decides to buy her a special present. It’s an expensive gold watch called “socialism”, but then he has second thoughts, knowing that he is dealing with a bimbo, so he buys her a cheap imitation called “multiculturalism”, and the stupid bimbo can’t tell the difference and thinks that she has been treated well. Quite a present it is. Enjoy it.

Ata boy, pat yourself on the back. Your country is so advanced that if the life didn’t already existed, you would have probably invented life too – that’s how advanced you are.

But don’t despair, when all is said and done, your country will go down in history as a destroyer of the western civilization – via your brilliant scheme called multiculturalism – with which you poisoned the western world – all in an effort to preserve your beloved capitalism.

And in the end, even capitalism won’t survive. It won’t survive because of your refusal to let it improve in a meaningful way, instead using immigration in order to fake progress. And what a progress it has been, people of European descent are becoming minorities in their own countries, thanks to your brilliant “leadership”.

Your country sabotaged Bernie Sanders election twice out of fear that it might bring “socialism”. Yeah, by all means, keep capitalism as conservative as possible, for as long as possible -that’s the key for success.

From my blog:

Nov 16, 2018 – Patton Was a Psychopath

Most people are shocked when I refer to some American Generals as psychopaths. Here is a good article about documented psychopath General George S. Patton, who wrote a poem about the horrors of peace after World War I.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/11/11/legendary-general-patton-hated-peace-so-much-he-wrote-poem-about-it.html

His anti-social views never impeded his US Army career, and was made a hero despite his mental illness. Historians agree that his success was due to excellent staff officers, while Patton roamed the frontlines enjoying the destruction and seeking fame. Nearly all the offensive success of his units was against demoralized and fleeing German forces.

Are These Antifa/BLM Riots A Jewish Coup?

No, I would say it’s a deep state diversionary op. You see, in this year of turmoil, when millions of people lost their jobs and there is a lot of suffering as a result of the pandemic, the clever elites decided to steer the discontent towards some more manageable territory.

In their (degenerate) minds, race conflict is preferable to class conflict. In a race conflict, the noble elites can play referees in a struggle between white deplorables and non-white deplorables. They can rise above the ugliness of racism because of their moral superiority over any types of deplorables.

In a class conflict, the elites won’t be allowed to play holier than thou, they would have to be active participants in such conflict where their moral superiority might not be enough for them to rise above the challenge by the deplorables. What the degenerates seem to dismiss is the distinct possibility that they might end up with both types of conflict – class and racial conflict at the same time, where they might not be on the receiving end at the beginning, but they might end up seeing some action after the race conflict runs its course.

Yeah, US is your typical communist trapped in a capitalist body, just screaming for help.

Just to show you how communist they are – in the middle east, between Islam and socialism – they choose Islam. Typical left wing reaction. You can’t get more right wing than Islam.

Now to be fair, it’s not only Islam, any country where any religion plays a prominent role, is by definition right wing. Since religion – contrary to popular belief – is not really a tolerant institution, especially towards those that are of different religion.

Whether you like it or not, Christianity is a right wing ideology too. Nothing good comes from the Middle East. All 3 religion that spawned from there are bastions of intolerance and they have a long history to prove it.

Going back to US and their fake “communism” – it is so easy to debunk, is not even funny. For all their much vaunted “progressiveness” and “liberalism”, except the insane immigration policy, they have nothing else to show for.

Yet they believe that they are fooling the world and that by pretending that they are “left wing” they will extend the life of their beloved capitalism. I think that the only ones that they are fooling is themselves, maybe capitalism is not going to be the first to go, but by destroying everything else, eventually capitalism will be done too.

How communist is US? Well, let’s see.

I believe that the last right wing country that they US went to war against was – Nazi Germany – don’t let the good looks fool you, they called themselves “Socialist” but they were so far right on the Richter scale that you could actually feel earthquakes when they marched right.

So the US is “communist” but their favorite targets are left wing governments (or as they like to call them regimes). Makes a lot of sense to me. Same thing with Nazi Germany, they were Socialist, yet their favorite target were other socialist countries (USSR) – who were called communist because it sounds more sinister – in order to scare the dummies in the west.

Forget about communism, US is so far from it, it’s not even funny, they are using immigration to falsify their image as “progressive” and “liberal”. Again, pretending that they are left wing. Why would allegedly left wing country start war after war against “fellow left wing countries”?

Because the left wingedness of the US is phony. There is no substance there. They know that left wing means progress, so that’s what they are trying to fake. And yet, they are hammering the propaganda about communism being bad. If it’s bad why are you trying to fake it?

Why don’t you try to fake a right wing dictatorship or something – since left wing is bad, right wing must be good. And for US it will be far easier to “fake” right wing than being “progressive” and “liberal”. Make up your mind, you can’t have it both ways, either left wing is good – then leave left wing countries alone, or declare yourself what you really are – and then it will all start to make sense why such animosity towards REAL left wing countries.

Hitler’s racism was directed towards Jews and Slavs, the favorite untermensch of the day (for the Nazis).

Today’s racism is directed towards the deplorables – I guess they are the favorite untermensch of present times. Today’s racism is much more advanced – because it’s not based on race, or even on nationality (it’s within the same race, and within same nations so it’s OK), so it actually doesn’t count as racism, but it’s the highest form of humanism there is.

Both of these 2 types of racism – the Nazi era, and today’s are designed by the same type of degenerates – western elites, whose primary objective is to save that darling of human achievement – capitalism.

It turns out Nazism wasn’t needed as a savior of capitalism, that beast is resilient. Today western degeneracies racism towards their own people is probably over the top effort too, the monster will survive again (capitalism), but it will wreck countries, nations and maybe even the western civilization.

It doesn’t matter, as long as the technique used for saving the beast is regarded as the highest form of humanism. Deplorables of the world unite! (in the west).

You don’t understand. US open, line officials are trained to stand like bastions of democracy. They are not allowed to move, especially for some Serb who has come to their land to play dictatorial type tennis. That line woman looked brain dead, any normal person could have stepped away and avoided the ball. I guess they are too exceptional to act like a normal human beings.

One very famous Serbian politician was named Dimitrije Cincar Markovic. I have no idea why I remember that and how he got his name, because according to this article – he wasn’t a Cincar, he was a pure-bred Serb, maybe it was considered a compliment in those days to be called Ciincar – I don’t know.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimitrije_Cincar-Markovi%C4%87

Milo Dzukanovic is the same height as Vucic. They are both 198 cm. Once I watched a documentary where they said that if Montenegro was to be considered a separate nation (which they’re not, they are part of the Serbian nation), but if they were to be considered a separate nation, they would be the tallest nation on earth.

That’s why sometimes I get in trouble. Because of similarities between Slavic languages, sometimes I assume that I know the meaning of some word in Russian for example, but I don’t.

I’ll give you an example – in my language Pravda means justice, in Russian it means truth, close enough, but no cigar.

By the way, Pravda is also justice in Serbian, and that land has seen a lot of injustice or nepravda in the last quarter of century. Serbs are patient people, eventually things will work out in their favor, I am pretty sure of that.

I think Vucic should be renamed Jagnjic. Those who speak Serbian will know what I’m talking about.

Vučić is fine, this agreement was likely the tit for tat for Montenegro like Karlin described
Serbia is an occupied and defeated nation, the only thing we can hope for is to kick the can down the road and wait for China and Russia to push the Great Satan back

After WW2 Europe collectively transferred their national interests portfolio to US, believing that as long as the Europeans serve US national interests – this will have trickle down effect on the European vassals – thus serving their national interests as well.

This was also supposed to prevent another European war, since in the past, whenever Europeans confronted each other protecting their individual national interests – it usually resulted in a war.

Based on the current situation, does it look like US can handle their own national interests, let alone someone else’s?

Propaganda can cover many shortcomings and deficiencies of any policy, but it’s not a long term solution. One day you’ll have to make a stand and defend the values that are worth defending and expose the emptiness of the propaganda cover-up. Propaganda can be used to beautify the ugly appearance of the truth, but eventually you have to deal with the real thing.

You are right. Navalny is the new Malala Yousuf. Trying to free his country from the shackles of medival tyranny. Definitely a Nobel Prize material.

The “poisoning” of Navalny is such a tragedy. With his removal from the political scene, it’s almost a certainty that the dream is dead.

Navalny was such a visionary, he knew that the only goal worth pursuing for Russia is to make the Americans like them. Without Navalny, there is no one left to pick up that most noble of causes, which every country on this planet should strive for, but particularly Russia.

Without such a clear vision, I think it’s safe to declare that the Russian foreign policy is in shambles. If they give up on Navalny’s vision, what other goals are left worth pursuing? Not many, I can tell you that.

Navalny was the last in line which started with Gorbachev, continued with Yeltsin, and was so rudely disrupted by Putin, who destroyed the dream. Now the only thing left for Russia is to wander aimlessly on the international stage, guessing if there ever is going to be another opportunity to make themselves likable by the Americans.

That’s what they have been missing throughout their whole history – to find someone to like them. Sure, there are plenty of countries that like Russia, but they are small fish, compared with the big prize. There is only one country whose admiration is worth pursuing. Everything else pales in comparison. If one lowly Poland can achieve such a lofty accomplishment, why can’t Russia? I don’t understand.

I think that Navalny is such an a**hole that I feel more sorry for the poison than for him. I bet that he made the poison sick when it was given to him, that’s what a rotten human being he is.

Maybe it’s time to rename the Novichok into a Starichok – based on the fact that it has been around in the western propaganda for a few years. The “news” that it’s generating are getting pretty old too.

Next time the west “reports” that some “key Russian dissident” has been “poisoned” – maybe they should use the name Postmodernchock – it might add credibility to their story.

I think they made a spelling mistake on his birth certificate. It should say Nahalny instead of Navalny. I can’t believe that intelligent nation like Russia can produce such a moron.

He believes that the main objective of Russia should be to make the Americans like them. I think it’s exactly the opposite. The litmus test for correctness of any Russian action should be: If the Americans disapprove of it – you are on a right track, If a Russian action meets approval from the Americans – you are doing something wrong and you need to completely reverse what you’re doing.

Leave the approval by the Americans as a raison d’entrée (as a matter of fact also as a raison d’main meal) for the lesser Slavs like Polish and Ukrainians and what have you. Russia doesn’t need “approval” from the ones whose historical and civilizational accomplishments they eclipse by a wide margin.

I wish I could share your enthusiasm for capitalism, but I can’t. In fact I think that the “west’s” obsession with saving capitalism is what is going to do you in.

The things have gone so far that in US, patriotism that should be directed towards the country and the nation is actually directed towards capitalism. Most can’t even tell the difference between the country and the system. They think it’s one and the same.

The importance of the country supersedes the importance of the system. You’ll figure it out when it’s all over – that you need your country more than you need that rotten system. I am not saying that it should be discarded overnight, but meaningful improvements can be made, not phony ones, like multiculturalism.

I don’t agree with your idea that everything after hunter-gatherer society was capitalism. Up until capitalism just owning a land was a ticket to riches. Owing a lot of land even today can make you rich, but there are now alternatives.

Owning a land doesn’t require particular entrepreneurial skills, for running a successful capitalist business – you do need some skills. Despite those skills, it shouldn’t be left to the tender mercies of the capitalist head honcho to decide who gets how much of the pie. The labor force is just as important contributor to the creation of wealth as is the capitalist with his skills, so their needs should be taken into account when distributing the results of the capitalist endeavor.

I believe that Standard Oil at the peak of their wealth owned somewhere around 10% of US. Yet they didn’t necessarily break any rules of competition on their way to accumulating such wealth. The antitrust laws came into effect, because there was a good chance that Standard Oil could have ended up being the owner of the US – forget about president and democracy and the rest of that phoniness.

Not that today is any different. Instead of one owner, US have several hundred big owners who hire the presidents to do the democracy for them. For entertainment purposes, the great unwashed “elects” them, but they do get their instructions about how to run the country from their owners – the ones who also own US.

People may think that capitalists are stupid because despite all the “evidence” of the failure of “communism”, they are still trying to incorporate various “socialist” elements in their otherwise vibrant and lively capitalist societies.

So what’s really going on here? Well, there is some bad news. Think about it this way, if capitalism wants to progress – which is not really showing any signs of – but if it really one day develops the desire to progress – it can progress in only one direction – towards socialism (I won’t use communism because it’s a really scary word with very negative connotations).

If capitalism ever develops the desire to progress – it can only progress towards socialism, the only other option is to “progress” towards feudalism. Those are the only 2 directions. Basically progress throughout human history only comes when you turn left. Nobody has ever made any progress by turning right. Whether you like this assessment or not this – take your argument with history.

The “clever” capitalists know this. They also hate any form of socialism from the bottom of their hearts. So what’s the solution? Well the solution is, if you want to keep capitalism conservative for as long as you can, you introduce some fake socialist elements in the society – such as insane levels of 3rd world immigration – and you label that as “progress”, or liberalism or left wing ideology, but it’s all basically c**p designed to keep capitalism conservative while pretending that the good ole capitalism is “evolving” and showing signs of “progress”.

The moral of the story is if you resist genuine socialism tooth and nails – you’ll get a fake one, which I am not sure it’s an improvement on the original one. Then there is another school of “thought” – that says that capitalism is the end of times perfection and nothing comes after that, thus no effort is necessary towards making any kind of progress. Basically, you can’t improve on perfection. Good luck with that belief too. Everything else is subject to improvements, only capitalism is perfection.

It’s not only about military power, Wlodzimierz, it’s about the overall impact on civilization – cultural, scientific and historical impact.

Poland has never been in the same league with Russia. Let me explain the difference in attitude between these 2 countries.

Poland has always aspired to be part of something great – part of Western civilization, Catholic Church, now NATO, and EU.

Russia doesn’t have to aspire to be part of something great – Russia IS something great. Too bad that Poland doesn’t aspire to be part of that greatness, to which you have close genetic ties– instead of the alien and hostile to the Slavs greatness that you constantly seek to allay yourselves with. Doesn’t say much for you as people, particularly as Slavs.

Poland, as well as Russia, is part of the great game between China and the US.

Russia doesn’t play second fiddle to anyone. That’s Poland’s role throughout history. ‘Smatter of fact you don’t have talent to play even second fiddle. You’re probably good enough to play maybe sixth or seventh fiddle at best.

This is like that cliché about workaholic bringing his job home. When your job is to spread evil around the world – eventually you’ll bring it home.

I think that Europe’s goose was cooked when they transferred their sovereignty to their former colonies in North America. There is a common fallacy among ordinary people, who tend to think that rich people know better. Thus if US is doing something – it must be the right thing to do. The US ushered multiculturalism with the immigration act of 1965 and the stupid Europeans felt compelled to follow this example because it was done by their “leader”- the US.

Going back to that nonsense that if the rich people are doing something – it must be the right thing to do – by following this “logic” it would mean that the US would have had the best response to Covid -19 – because they are the richest country in the world, and thus they must be the smartest. Clearly that wasn’t the case, their response to the Covid -19 was the worst. And I think the same applies to their “idea” about multiculturalism. Just because they invented it – it doesn’t mean that it’s the best idea ever. Actually is probably the worst.

But then again, the only reason why they invented multiculturalism and the insane immigration policies is not because they are “socialist”, but because they hate socialism from the bottom of their capitalist hearts. The fake socialism, which is what multiculturalism represents, was invented for one purpose only – to save capitalism.

Even if in the process of saving capitalism, multiculturalism destroys nations, states and ultimately the western civilization. In the mind of the deranged capitalist affictionados, capitalism in importance supersedes the importance of the state, nation and civilization.

In other words, if you save capitalism – you’ll automatically save the state, the nation and the civilization. That’s clearly not the case. But the stupid Europeans should know better than their former colonists in North America. For Europe, capitalism is the 3rd socio-political and economic system that they have gone through in their history.

North America, pretty much has seen only capitalism in their history, with a minor nostalgic throw-back to some idyllic past of forced voluntarism which did wonders for their history and whose effect is felt to this day.

European civilization should be able to survive capitalism, not allow it to be a final chapter in their civilizational odyssey. If someone else is so in love with capitalism, let their ship go down carrying the precious cargo of capitalism.

Saving capitalism will not automatically save the institutions of “lesser” importance such as states, nations and civilization. It’s the other way around; insisting on preserving capitalism will destroy those more important institutions. I think that the Anglos have a genetic disorder which makes them cling to systems whose time has past. Look at the British; they are still clinging to feudalism via their cherished institutions of monarchy and fairy tales of royalty and blue bloods and all that nonsense. You have to know when it’s time to let go of things that belong to the past.

Multiculturalism is not based on any real values, it was created purely for propaganda purposes and it has no practical benefits. The idea that you can keep socialism at bay, by pretending that’s already here is a joke, and the joke is on those who think that they fooled the world with their “cleverness” of inventing fake socialism.

Multiculturalism would have been a clever idea if it did less damage than the real socialism. But that’s not the case – it is more harmful than the real socialism. The only reason why “western” elites stick with this idea is because it portrays them as the good guys.

In the old “communist” mythology, the rich elites were the bad guys, and the working class were the good guys, fighting for more economic equality. With multiculturalism, the rich elites turned the tables on the working class. Now the rich elites are the good guys – fighting for equality and inclusiveness and all that phony BS, while the working class are the bad guys – the bigots, racists and generally intolerant people.

Let me tell you something, when you are rich It’s easy to pretend that you are anything, you have the propaganda machine on your side spewing nonsense incessantly, and even though nothing of what you pretend to be is true, nobody has the money and the resources to fight this propaganda garbage. I mean, come on, in which fantasy world are the working class the bad guys and the rich elites the good guys? How stupid do you have to be to buy that nonsense? I don’t care if they manage to bring the whole 3rd world to the west – that will still not make them either socialists or “good guys”. It’s all phony.

That’s sounds like a plausible explanation too. I remember your article about it from last year, and I think I wrote a comment on it too. I still think that the Polish are blowing the whole thing out of proportion. They benefited from the Soviet largesse more than they suffered from some ill will, even if the Soviet benevolence toward Poland was unintentional.

Let me venture a guess why the Katyn massacre happened. Soviet authorities simply didn’t know what to do whit the captured Polish officers. If they tried to use them as part of the Soviet army, the Polish might have claimed later that they made significant contribution to their liberation – to the point of actually liberating Poland on their own – which would have been complete nonsense of course.

Although, it’s very doubtful whether the captured Polish military personnel would have agreed to fight for the Soviets. So there were not too many options left for the Soviet authorities, except maybe to gulagize the Polish captives.

The whole situation is absurd. Polish volunteers fought for the British army, hoping that their contribution, once the war is over, will be considered as a proof that Poland was part of the winning alliance and thus deserves independence.

No love lost between Poland and USSR. Poland fought for the British, ended up being liberated by USSR, didn’t feel any gratitude towards the Russians, because they felt that their liberation was collateral accomplishment. Which is true, Poland was only collateral beneficiary of the war between the Nazis and USSR, but still the Russians deserve more credit, than GB – for whom Polish volunteers fought.

If it was up to GB to liberate Poland, they’ll still be under German occupation. Basically, the Katyin forest happened because USSR was rightly concerned that if those Polish officers were left alive they would have claimed disproportionate credit for liberating Poland, to the point of demanding independence, which is something that they wouldn’t have deserved based on their contribution in the fight against the Nazis. .

The left wing, right wing divide in US never had too much substance. They are both deep-state parties whose primary objective is to keep the rich happy and to keep capitalism chugging along.

The good cop, bad cop routine – where the Republicans played the bad cop – whose main concern was helping big business, while the liberals were supposed to be concerned with the plight of the working man (sob) is totally meaningless.

In fact, at the present moment it can be argued that those 2 sides have now flipped. Trump is more of a liberal than the democrats are. How so? There are even talks of Trump bringing UBI which is as socialist as you can get- basically left wing policy.

Trump is also a patriot, he is concerned about the domestic deplorables, not the foreign ones for which US has no obligations (yet). Democrats are the real phonies, totally in the pockets of the deep state, while pretending that they care about the common man.

When the communist manifesto declared “Workers of the world unite”, they didn’t mean unite by coming in one place – the west, or particularly US.

Workers of the world should unite, but stay where they are, and let their home countries solve their problems with a help from the country who has their well-being so much at heart (yeah right).

The reason why they hate Trump so much is because he is a genuine deep-state member, part of the rich elites and is not as easy to boss around like the usual domestic servants which the political elites in the US are. That’s why the deep state hates him so much, he is not their household help.

I’ve heard that Trump is donating his presidential salary, which for him is probably just pocket change – just to show the deep state that he is not on their payroll, he is doing his job out of love for his country.

Trump is their only hope, he might not be the smartest, but his heart is in the right place, he wants to do what’s right for the American people instead of those other deep-state phonies, whose main invention was to use catastrophic levels of immigration as a proof that they are “liberal” eliminating the need to do something for the domestic working class.

Go do some voting, stupid. Democracy depends on you.

My apologies, it looks like I screwed up this one. It’s just that Bezmenov and Bezimenov are awfully close, so I thought that they changed the spelling to make their last name appear more agreeable.

You can tell that this guy was a phony by his name – which correctly spelled should be Bezimenov – which of course means “Without a name”.

Based on what he stood for, it seems right that he didn’t deserve to have a name.

Maybe his trip to India has been inspired by the infatuation with India by The Beatles, and even they realized what a phonies the Indians and their “spirituality” can really be.

They even wrote a song about it: “Sexy Sadie” in which they unmasked the phony guru Yogi, who wanted to transcendent Mia Farrow in the sack.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_Sadie

What makes US truly exceptional are its elites. Obviously this exceptionalism doesn’t extend all the way down to more than half of the population – the so called deplorables – who are thankfully replaceable, which is currently under way – just to show them who are really the exceptional ones.

Luckily, no one is even planning to do any replacement of the exceptionals – which would be treason of course, and probably dealt with accordingly, but not to worry, once the 3rd world deplorables fully replace the domestic deplorables, the replacement of the exceptionals WILL occur, despite the beliefs of the degenerates that they possess some unique qualities that are universally admired – especially by their 3rd world protégés.

You see, the 3rd world deplorables tend to be emotional that way, they don’t care about the “unique” qualities of the exceptionals and eventually will come to see the different hue of the skin of the exceptionals, exceptionally offensive to their sensibilities and will do away with the degenerates who see themselves as untouchables – but that’s probably few decades down the road and the degenerates definitely don’t possess such fair-sightedness to see what’s coming to them.

I can almost see a thought forming in that degenerate’s mind where he believed that the only reason the inferior Slavs existed (in a cushy manner on some vast stretches of land) was because of the German kindness.

Thanks to the German kindness who didn’t invade those lands inhabited by people who were inferior to the Germans for centuries – the Slavs existed on lands that they didn’t deserve – based on their inferiority.

Luckily, history produced Hitler to remedy this grave injustice to the German people. The problem with this formula is that the lands that the Slavs occupied were not inhabited by inferior people when those lands were settled – otherwise the Germans would have out-competed them for those lands way back then, they were not inhabited by inferior people during thousands of years of history, and they were definitely not inhabited by inferior people when degenerates come to check on the native populations suitability to inhabit those lands based on their genetic qualities.

By the fight that they put on, the Slavs (those who count for something) proved that they always deserved that land, definitely more than the ones who thought otherwise.

This is my 3rd and final installment in the series: “How did Belarus got its name”. Based on some thorough research, I came to the conclusion that the Belorussians didn’t give that name to themselves. It was given to them by the Russians based on the tendency of the Belorussians to scare easily.

Like the song from Procol Harum – Whiter Shade of Pale – that’s how the Belorussians turn when somebody spooks them. This is how devious the Russians really are, they knew of this quality of the Belorussians to scare easily, so that’s why they moved them close to the western borders of Russia.

When some unwanted invaders from the west come (as they frequently do), they see the Belorussians turn whither shade of pale, and they think that Russia would be a cakewalk. As they advance deeper into Russia, they usually get ass-whooping that they’ll remember for centuries.

I am just kidding, Belorussians are great people.

“You said there is no reason, and the truth is plain to see”.

There could be a reason for optimism in all this China-mongering (from a Russian perspective). In the last couple of hundred years, a final test of “greatness” for a leading western power was to attack Russia. Maybe this time, the leading western power will choose China to put them out of their misery, instead of Russia.

Great Britain is trying that as we speak (write, correspond, whatever) The are trying to rebuild the old British Empire – albeit on a much smaller scale – by bringing all the former colonized people into GB.

I think your formula is better, why colonize other people’s countries, when you can colonize yourself (we are talking about a real colonoscopy here) with the former subjects. Good luck to you, and keep hating the Slavs.

“ The main preoccupation of the west is to preserve capitalism in the most possible conservative form. That’s why they are going out of their way to make the society appear liberal, while keeping capitalism conservative.”

Very true and it sums up the tragedy of the West. While unrestrained immigration would decimate the bargaining power of the deplorable, the privatisation of profits and the socialising of losses keeps the capitalist’s wealth intact no matter the consequences of bad business decisions the business elites in general or the banking elites in particular incur.

I don’t see Romanians assimilating any Slavs. The only ones that Romania ever succeeded assimilating in their “culture” were the Gypsies. It’s no coincidence that the Gypsies are called Roma – sharing the name with their assimilators with whom they are basically the same, you stupid monkey.

Just about everything about the west today is phony. The so called struggle for equality is the pinnacle of phoniness. In socialism, there was only one inequality that was worth addressing.

I guess you can call the communists unimaginative. Because look what’s happening in the west today: They are attacking any possible inequality that they can find: racial, ethnic, religious, sexist – anything possible, and using this as an excuse of being too busy to tackle the big one – the only one that really matters.

You see, capitalist scientists discovered that every prole is born with a socialist gene. There are only two ways you go about addressing this genetic anomaly. You can try to satisfy the needs of this genetic crave for socialism by appeasing parts of it, or you can try to trick it.

The west chose the second option. They decided to fool the socialist gene by introducing fake socialism. And why not? Look how well that concept worked for Nazi Germany. Just call yourself “Socialist” and you can rest assured that you fooled the “socialist” gene in the proles.

First of all, proles in the west are too stupid to be even aware that they have that gene, but just in case, fooling it won’t do any harm, in case it starts to develop.

The problem with the west is not that is too liberal, but that is trying too hard to pretend that it is. The main concern of the western “democracies” are not the rights of men, or equality or any of that highflying BS.

The main preoccupation of the west is to preserve capitalism in the most possible conservative form. That’s why they are going out of their way to make the society appear liberal, while keeping capitalism conservative.

Good luck with that formula. Because it is succeeding in keeping the operating system -capitalism conservative, but all other software applications are incompatible with this outdated operating system and are not working properly.

Capitalism needs to be liberalized, not society. The phony search of equality in the west was “accomplished” by making the 3rd world deplorables equal with the domestic deplorables. How has that benefited the domestic deplorables? How has that benefited the society? The only beneficiary was the capitalism. By importing masses from the 3rd world, they succeeded in keeping capitalism conservative, while pretending that the society as a whole has become “liberal”.

The goal was never to achieve any kind of meaningful “equality”. The goal was to fool the world that the western elites are working on achieving equality, while at the same time trying to preserve their inequality with everybody else.

Just because the magic formula is working, it doesn’t mean that it’s not close to catastrophic failure. This obsession with preserving capitalism in as much pristine form as possible, while everything else is falling apart is what’s going to destroy the west in the end.

Actually I think that even the whole country of Romania came pretty close to being assimilated into the Slavic world.

It’s perhaps a little known fact that Romania is the only non-Slavic country to ever use the Cyrillic alphabet – for a few hundred years – before they become uppity and switched to Latin.

Romanians are known to seamlessly commingle with the Slavs. There is a huge Romanian diaspora in the Balkans – called Vlachs – who live in many Slavic countries and are usually well respected and not discriminated against in those countries.

I guess you can say that the Vlachs contribute to the multicultural milieu of the Balkans. Actually, not only to the multicultural milieu, but also to the multicultural kilometreau of the Balkans (just trying to be funny).

After the collapse of the USSR, the citizens of Belarus got so depressed that they named their country after the Frankenstein actor – Bela Lugosi. The hope was that their country too, can undergo a miracle transformation and become undead – same as Frankenstein.

This is when I started to laugh. Cyrano, this is one of your best in a long while. Despite minor mis-identification of Lugosi. Pleasure, man. ;))) Undead is a good term to use.

Sorry, I totally messed that one up. You are absolutely right.

I am deeply hurt because my theory of how Belarus got their name – Bella – pretty – Pretty Russians – got such a cold reception.

I have no choice but to float another theory. It’s my sincere belief that Belarus got their name after the actor Bela Lugosi. What was so appealing about this actor? Well, he was famous for playing Frankenstein, so here is my theory:

After the collapse of the USSR, the citizens of Belarus got so depressed that they named their country after the Frankenstein actor – Bela Lugosi. The hope was that their country too, can undergo a miracle transformation and become undead – same as Frankenstein.

I believe that the citizens of Belarus were nostalgic about their communist past and wanted that part to become undead – to live forever. That’s why they have hard time parting with Lukashenko, he is basically Bela Lugosi reincarnated – he never goes away in his capacity as Frankenstein (I’m just kidding, I actually like Lukashenko).

If only the voters in the last elections in Belarus had the presence of mind to wear necklaces made of garlic at the ballot boxes – what can I tell you – the course of history could have been changed.

Let me take a stab at that one. The reason why the Russian nationalists might be leaning towards US in the China/US dispute is because maybe they mistrust China.

Eduard Shevardnadze – who was the last foreign minister of the USSR – apparently warned the Russians before he passed away: “Keep an eye on China, they want Siberia”.

For all their faults, the Americans don’t have any designs on Russian territory, I guess they are content with Alaska. The Chinese apparently – according to Shevardnadze – do, and the Russians should be wary of them.

I trust Shevardnadze’s assessment, and I think Putin also agrees with it too. Just a few years ago, Putin signed a border agreement with China – I think it was about some ridiculous dispute over useless island in the Amur river – over which China and USSR went to war in the 1960’s.

It was interesting the speech that Putin made during this occasion. He said something like: “Historically our country (compared to China) has been the stronger one, but that’s no longer the case. So I think it’s in our best interest to sign an agreement in order to prevent any future possible border disputes with China”. Something along those lines.

I think that the partnership between Russia and China is out of necessity, it’s not in Russia’s long term interest to be stuck as China’s ally. It’s US who is pushing them into this marriage of (in)convenience.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-russia-border/china-signs-border-demarcation-pact-with-russia-idUKPEK29238620080721

To me it’s obvious that big part of the problem with the Belarusians is their attitude. These people are full of themselves. What irritates me the most, is them having the guts to call themselves Belarusians (for those of you unfamiliar with the issue – the name Belarusian comes from the 2 words: Bella – which is Italian for pretty or beautiful and Russian). What are they trying to imply, that they are the Pretty Russians, as opposed to the rest of the Russians who are not? The nerve of these people.

Lemme explain why “democracy” is totally phony BS whose only purpose is to create an illusion of fairness. Winston Churchill once used a verbal diarrhea to describe democracy as: “worst form of government, except for all the others”. He was right only about the first part, since it only begins to explain the phonines of “democracy”.

Prior to capitalism, going back through almost 10 000 years of written history, the thing that all rulers in every country of the world had in common was that were always the richest persons in the land. Whether they were called kings, emperors, or any other type of hegemons, usually the ruler of the land was the richest.

With the arrival of capitalism, they wanted to create the illusion of fairness where governing the land is not to be in the hands of the wealthiest person, but instead it’s going to be handled by professional politicians, “democratically” elected by the clueless masses.

The difference is superficial, the richest people in the country are no longer the rulers, they just hire politicians to do the “ruling” for them, and the way those politicians are selected are though reality shows called elections which are meaningless, because the politicians still get the marching orders from the rich, and not from the great unwashed who “elected” them. Totally meaningless exercise in futility.

There has been a lot of talk in recent years about the “deep state”. People are mystified about this “deep state” and its members. Who are they, and how does one become a member? Well, the deep state should be called the deep pockets state. That will pretty much explain everything. It will explain that the richest elites are still the ones in charge, but instead of doing the ruling themselves – which might leave an impression of unfairness – they actually pay somebody to rule in their name.

The professional politicians receive their orders from the deep pockets state, not from the clueless masses who are asked every 4-5 years to nod one way or another and who – beside that meaningless nod in one of several (or only 2) possible directions – don’t have any other say in how their countries are governed whatsoever.

Yeah, sure, the great unwashed are really asked for an input and are listened to by the rich elites, they are in on the decision making process. I actually think that the Chinese model is superior to the American one, because of one big difference. The political elites in China don’t get the marching orders from the rich elites. The political elites are the ones who are actually in power, instead of what’s the case in the phony western democracies.

Therefore, the Chinese model is more fair to the masses, even though they don’t participate in any phony elections, because the Chines politicians are able to make decision beneficial to the majority of the population, without being in the pockets of the deep pockets state.

That independence of the political elites from the influence of the rich elites is what counts, not some phony elections. To be fair, probably a member of the rich elites in China still has more say and can exact a greater influence on the politicians then an average citizen can, but the politicians still don’t receive direct orders from the rich, like they do in the western “democracies”.

The flow of power in the west looks like this: Rich – Politicians – Great unwashed. In China is more like: Politicians – Rich – Great unwashed. No voting needed whatsoever. To be fair, in a system like the Chinese, the concerns of the people are not more listened to than in the west, but at least in the Chinese system, the politicians are allowed to use their imagination and via their psychic abilities to try to at least guess what the needs of the people are.

Western politicians don’t even want to tap into their psychic powers in order to guess what the needs of the people might be. Their main goal is to respond to the wishes and the desires of their masters – the rich elites, not to the plight of the masses.

Maybe one of these days someone will understand that it doesn’t matter what you call yourself, it maters what you do. That you can call yourself “socialist” and still be a far right fascist, or similarly you can call yourself “liberal” and still be pretty much on the right in the political spectrum.

There was nothing revolutionary or socialist in the Hitler’s ideas. His idea of “socialism” was to help the rich by kick-starting the armament industry – which will in turn help the poor. What a novel idea. Pretty much a classic capitalist formula for success.

Rich never help the poor in any shape, way or form. It’s always the other way around – the poor usually help the rich to get rich. Now that’s a socialist idea. Other socialist idea would be to redistribute that upward flow of wealth, exactly how much should the poor help the rich get rich and how much (hopefully more) they should keep for themselves.

Hitler was just a little bit shy about admitting what he really was – a far right fascist nut who had nothing in common with socialism. But the west is full of dummies, they take people at their word, call yourself a “liberal” and people believe you that you are. You can call yourself anything you want, it will not make you what you claim to be. It’s an old cliché, but actions speak louder than words.

From my perspective, at least in this case my sympathies are on the US side. To me it’s obvious that the US was so traumatized by their war against the national “Socialist” Germany, that after WW2 they felt compelled to go to war against all bunch of other socialist countries, like:

North Korea, Cuba (almost), Vietnam, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan (because of their legacy of being socialist once, I suppose), Iraq again, Syria, Libya, Venezuela (almost, but it’s never too late).

I think the Germans were successful tricking US into believing that Germany was “socialist” and this started the whole unfortunate chain of events, were the US believed that all the other socialist countries that they went to war against, after WW2, were like Germany.

Although the US should have known better, because they also consider themselves being “liberal” and “progressive”, although the only thing that they have to show for their “liberalism” and “progressiveness” is multiculturalism and pretty much nothing else, but maybe that’s the whole purpose of that charade.

While on the other hand Germany had absolutely nothing to show for their “socialism”, so I don’t know how they managed to fool them into believing that they are socialist, or at the bare minimum left wing. I don’t know, man, everything is just so confusing.

According to you, the Croats got a fairer deal under the Habsburgs than they did both under Yugoslavia and maybe even under their own rule. If that is so, why was there such a desire by the Croats in the late 19 century to create a union of the Southern Slavs? The main difference between the Croats and the Serbs historically, has been the ability of the Serbs to win their independence from the Turks on their own. Croats were not capable of winning their independence on their own, they needed the Serbs, which they masked with a desire to form a union of Southern Slavs state, for which the Serbs had no use at all – because they already had their independence – no Yugoslavia was needed to free them.

Croats are stupid cattle. In fact if you look in the dictionary under cattle – you’ll see picture of Croats. It basically comes down to this:

The reason why the Croats feel that they are better than the Serbs is because they were under Austro-Hungary occupation, while the Serbs were under Turkish occupation.

It’s a real source of pride, I’ll tell you. That’s like being molested as a kid and being proud of your molester because he was wealthy and educated, while looking down on your neighbour, because in his childhood he was molested by a bum.

The Croats are constantly looking for someone to Epsteinize them and take them for a ride on the Lolita express, because mentally they’ll forever stay underage and underdeveloped.

The Yugoslavs were no match for the diabolical scheme (scam actually) called “democracy”. When Yugoslavia collapsed, I believe it was in debt to the rune of some 20 bln dollars to the “west”.

Paltry by today standards, by Yugoslavian standards of those days, an almost insurmountable amount, which they couldn’t repay in a timely fashion. The worst part was that thanks to that debt they were left exposed to blackmail from the “west”.

That blackmail came in the form that the “west” insisted on elections in Yugoslavia on the level of the republics, not on a federal level. Someone was aware that federal elections won’t be able to brake-up Yugoslavia, even though technically federal elections would have been more “democratic” then elections in each of the republics – if achieving “democracy” was really the objective.

Democracy is the phoniest concepts ever invented, when skillfully used is just a tool for destroying countries. China is aware of this. So far they are doing great job resisting calls for more “democracy”.

Interestingly enough, another bright character who saw that indebtedness to the west leaves the door open to blackmail – was Nicolae Ceausescu. So he made an effort to repay the Romania’s debt to the west, prior to the collapse of socialism there. The cost that the Romanian society had to pay was terrible, the living standards plummeted and there was enormous suffering for the population.

I think Romania managed to repay the debt and Ceausescu was rewarded for his efforts by being executed. The moral of the story is you don’t borrow money from someone who can creatively construct new ways for repaying that debt – by demanding “democratic” reforms.

You borrow money and you end up owing them “reforms”.

I think that the Serbs and the Croats shouldn’t necessarily feel bad about being manipulated into mutual assured destruction. They were just not up to the task. I mean look at China and Hong Kong – they are basically the same people – not like the Serbs and the Croats where there are some differences (religion).

The Chinese and the Hong Kongers (I am inventing a new nationality here) are the same people and yet somebody is trying to pit them against each other – telling one side that they are better than the other. Same thing like between the Serbs and the Croats and like the Ukrainians and the Russians. It’s a very easy trick to pull off. Just tell one side that the other side are holding them back, sit back and enjoy the “democracy” show.

You know what thought gives me immense pleasure, about you – Croats? That you are always, always, on the wrong side of history. Whichever side you are on – eventually ends up losing. First, the Austro-Hungarian empire, then Nazi Germany, and now this one – 3rd time lucky? I don’t think so. And it’s not you that chooses the wrong side, since you are never in position to chose anything, rather you usually end up being chosen by the wrong side, usually under a dim light in a back alley which makes even the ugliest street whore (which you definitely are) appear pretty. You are a real prize, a catch that any dying empire loves to have in their final collection.

The reason why the Serbs were so demonized in the 90’s is simple – their undying love for the Russians. To my knowledge Serbia is the only Slavic country that has never gone to war against Russia – and most likely they never will.

This kind of devotion definitely deserves punishment. Serbia played very important role in the 90’s for Russia. Their treatment by the west – you know who I mean – was a wake up call for Russia that allowed them to open their eyes and see who they are dealing with.

It’s not only Yevgeny Primakov’s plane that made a U turn over the Atlantic, it’s the entire Russian foreign policy. Thanks to Serbia, Russia avoided possible few more years of Yeltsin’s rule – which might have been enough to finish them off for good.

Serbia was a small pawn in a much bigger game. Serbia was just an early warning signal and they did a great job. There is only one Slavic country that ever amounted and ever will amount to anything – hint – it’s not Poland. Serbs incurred the wrath of the new millennium lasting empire wannabes by being such devoted friends and brothers to that Slavic country (I’ll repeat the hint – it’s not Poland).

What led to this current division in America is the wrong choice which the electorate made in the last election.

Obviously they elected the wrong candidate (opposite to the wishes of the deep state) – and caused them tremendous pain and suffering,

There is a simple way to fix the US electoral system. Let’s face it, the Americans have been spoiled for far too long with multitude of choices (2, sometimes 3). It’s easy to see how someone can get confused with such a myriad of choices.

Why not simplify the process? In the next election field only 1 candidate – a real deep state darling, and let see if the Americans can manage to elect a wrong candidate out of a choice of 1. Stop giving them so many options.

There are lot of similarities between Nazi Germany and US today. The main glaring one is the belief which was widespread in both countries that they are “special”. Germans called themselves “ubermensch” and the US are of course “exceptional”.

Let’s examine this a little bit further. When Hitler called the Germans “ubermensch” he bestowed this epithet on ALL Germans. Hitler would have never dreamed to call half of the Germans “deplorables”, like the lovely US elites do. Why is that? Well for one thing, Germany was a historical nation with genetic bond uniting them all.

The American elites figured out that US doesn’t have that genetic bond to unite them all, so the only ones worth calling “exceptional” are its elites. They are the ones that make US special and they are the only ones worth protecting. Marvelous, marvelous idea.

You dismiss the deplorables – basically you exclude them from the nation, and you’ll have nobody left to fight for that nation and for the rich degenerates who think that they are the only ones that make US exceptional – but who by themselves can’t do anything to save the nation – without the help from the “deplorables”.

Somebody needs to do some major rethinking about who really deserves the epithet of “deplorables” and who should really be called “adorables”. Maybe all they need to do is cross-redistribute those compliments.

Fairly recently I read on the internet a comment from someone that said:

Everything that’s good in a human being dies around the age of 11.

It blew my mind. Humans are the most vicious animals that mother nature ever invented. Well, at least at some point most of us used to be good. Then the innocence died, and we revealed our true faces. I think that’s the reason humans like pets, because animals never lose their innocence, they remain goofy and lovable throughout their lives.

In philosophy you have a holly triad for solving problems: thesis, antithesis and synthesis. In this case looking down on other races is the thesis – that makes you a racist, looking down on your own race is the antithesis – that makes you a great humanist – if you are white (also very stupid, but that’s beside the point). Unfortunately, there is no synthesis here – that one will have to be supplemented with prosthesis: Inviting other races to look down on your own race, which supposedly makes nobody racist – especially if the invitee is white. That’s the prosthesis which will allow the white race to limp into the future for some time until complete moronization takes over and eliminates them – thus preventing them from participating in any kind of racism – either as racism emitters or racism receivers. You f**ken morons, what the f*ck is wrong with you?

What’s this obsession with the Jews, man? Forget about the Jews, they are not the real problem. The real problem are the WASP elites. Those are the real psychopaths who are bringing down the whole western civilization.

That concept of “multiculturalism” that they came up with is pure evil. You see, they might look stupid, but even they sometimes manage to come up with a real diabolical ideas. They know that humanity always, marches to the left. That has been the case for the past 10 000 years.

Progress only comes when you turn left, nothing good ever comes from right wing policies. So what did the bright minds decided to do? They invent right wing “liberalism”. Copied the idea from the good old Adolf – who was a leader of right wing “socialist” party, and the WASP elites came up with the right wing liberalism idea.

Because if you remove the immigration, or multiculturalism or whatever you want to call that insanity, the US has nothing left to show for their much flaunted “liberalism”. It’s essentially a reactionary right wing country in every aspect of their policies – except immigration – which they use as a camouflage for their true identity.

Europe had real liberalism, before they got really stupid and decided that you are not a real liberal unless you follow the US example and use immigration as a proof that you are liberal.

And why did they came up with the concept of multiculturalism to begin with? Because they believed that multiculturalism will save capitalism by faking progress.

Let me tell you something, if what it takes to save capitalism is introducing multiculturalism – then capitalism is not worth saving. The price to pay is just too high. Capitalism can be reformed and progress can be made, but they don’t want to do that. The idea of multiculturalism is used in order to stagnate the development of capitalism, not to improve it. Instead of improving it, they decided to deceive everybody with the idea that multiculturalism represents progress and improvement of capitalism.

You can tell real progress because everybody benefits from it – from the insane immigration benefit only the elites because it allows them to stagnate capitalism and to keep everybody confused. Right wing “liberalism” is what’s going to bring down the western civilization.

If you are a real liberal you don’t need an immigration to prove it. The situation in the US is so messed up, that probably they’ll need to take a real right turn, for a brief period of time in order to correct the deceptive “liberal” policies, and then proceed with real left wing reforms that will benefit the majority of the population, not just the rich crooks.

Why (Oh, why) do the empires – or at least very successful countries collapse? The answer is actually very simple. Because the elites of such successful entities lose touch with reality.

The elites in every country, even the worst s**tholes on the planet earth are always going to be OK, better than the ordinary citizens – that’s the whole point of being an elite – to avoid the suffering of the common people.

And because there is no mechanism to increase the suffering of the elites in tandem with the suffering of the ordinary population – when the times are tough – the elites fail to respond to the difficulties that ordinary citizens face.

The elites start living in a fantasy world where they believe that as long as they are OK, the country is OK. But the elites are going to be OK right up to the moment the country collapses, so that’s not an accurate measure of how the country is doing. The country can be in the doldrums and the elites will still be OK.

That disconnect from reality is what prevents them to undertake measures that will alleviate the plight of the majority of the population.

To make the things even worse, the elites of the enlightened west (that’s how you call countries that are struck by lightning) seems to have found a way to progressively increase the benefits for themselves proportionately to the decrease of good fortunes coming the way of the common citizens, thus further removing any incentive to act on behalf of the majority of the population and further increasing the chasm that separates the haves from the have nots.

The white race needs to exercise their demons (not exorcise, but exercise – in order for them to stay fit). For that purpose, in an attempt to right the wrongs of colonization, the bright minds of the west decided to self-colonize themselves with enthusiasts from the 3rd world.

Fortunately, the smart elites directed this colonization towards the deplorables – who are the main beneficiaries of getting it up their a**es – in other words – being colon-ized by the 3rd world hordes.

Don’t call me Nostradamus yet, but it’s not going to end well for the western civilization. That famous mantra about all of us being equal – was ripped off right out of the communist ideology.

The communists were unimaginative people. What good can come out of closing the gap between the elites and the deplorables? The real beaut is to convince the domestically raised deplorables to accept the 3rd world deplorables as their equals, not to live in some fantasy world where the deplorables can dream of being equal with the adorables – in other words, the elites.

So the European morons rose up in solidarity with their oppressed brothers in the US. No wonder the western civilization is on the verge of collapse. It’s full of morons. Totally clueless and the only remaining instinct that they have (unfortunately it’s not a survival instinct) is to follow the US in everything that they do. Because if it’s done in the US – it must be the right thing to do. How were they able to produce more than 2k worth of civilization based on imbecility like that is beyond me. By all means, keep following the US – look how well it’s working for them, how can you go wrong following such a lead?

I don’t know why everybody is freaking out over the tense multicultural situation in the US. The solution is quite simple: Throw the deplorables under the multicultural bus, so the exceptionals can continue basking in the multicultural love that they so painstakingly created.