Very sophisticated trolling, “Aaron.” I’m honestly mildly impressed.

…and of course your victims should accept being untermenschen in their own land — that is, if they’re loyal.

Sounds like what’s in store for Southerners and other “legacy Americans.” Not sure why the Khazars hate us, but by God they do.

Wally is saying things that need to be said and I for one deeply appreciate his posts and links. You, anonymous, are either a Republican or a hasbarist but I repeat myself. Who don’t you piss off back to Breitbart.

And what’s even more disgusting is that there are no shortage of GOP cuckservatives (eg, the clowns at Instapundit or Power Line) who would cheer this evil shit on if not proudly wear the sniper T. Their worship of Israel is nothing short of treason. Of course, they also worship the butcher Lincoln and his rabble of drunks and war criminals who laid waste to the South.

Mrs Yeager, are you suggesting that only ethnic Germans are permitted to engage in criticism of Hitler? Does this mean that you, as an ethnic German, will no longer share with us your thoughts on (eg) Churchill or Roosevelt or WC Handy?

I took for the purpose of a philosophy major. ot that I was ever able to read Hegel or Kant in the original, or had any interest for that matter. It was fun wrestling with Nietzsche tho, not that I ever cared for him as a “thinker.”

All that said, just for the hell of it I looked at a couple of the high schools in the largish Southern city where I live. Three of four offered German. there’s also a German/English dual language school and no shortage of adult education programs in German language, culture etc. And come to think of it, there’s a well-known German restaurant with a polka band every Wednesday and Thursday. So if there is some sort of conspiracy against the teaching of German language or culture, it’s not here.

When and where is this? There was a German department in the small private college in the South I attended in the 80s. I took three semesters of German. Requirement for my major. Many such cases.

Paul Fussell (wounded in action in Europe) provided an interesting perspective on attitudes among the troops in his book “Wartime.” Fussell contends that most troops regarded the whole affair with a great deal of cynicism — at the very least, none of the “save the world” b.s. that Tom Brokaw, et al later foisted on them. As a teenager I undertook an oral history project of my part of the Deep South. To my great surprise, the WW2 veterans — and these were guys who had been in the combat units, which is where Southerners tend to end up — had nothing good to say about the whole experience. One guy, who’d landed in Normandy with the glider infantry, said, “I didn’t know where the hell I was, and I sure as hell didn’t know why.” Roosevelt was not very popular, either.

Just to save you time, my Orthodox brother (Russian Orthodox here) – this anon is indeed a troll, probably (as you’ve divined) hasbarist, who comes here to earn his shekels per response, or whatever. Really not worth your time.

Sir: had only your wise counsel been available to my impoverished Southern brethren before they descended into the long nightmare tunnel of oxy–>black tar–>fentanyl–>death, I’m sure they would have avoided in completely. Nevertheless, I’ll make, on their behalf, observation of the following forces which were somewhat beyond their control:

1. The collapse of the manufacturing economy thanks to “free trade.”
2. A transition to a service economy from a “dirty work” economy.
3. Depression in wages from unrestricted immigration, which resulted in both parents working, children raised by strangers.
4. The general decadence pushed since the 1960s.
5. The Zionization of traditional evangelical churches (which began in earned in the late sixties).
6. And the fact that since 1865, the South has been a captured people, with genocide waged against its traditions and memories. We have been “un-personed” by the Empire. Well, f*ck them too,

And so on. there’s quite a lot to it, more than I can dash off while stuck in another of these damned traffic jams near my city in Louisiana. However, you sound oddly like Kevin “let em starve” Williamson with his well-known dismissal of the white working class.

I haven’t seen you on Unz, btw, so welcome. I sincerely mean that. Best discussions on the Inter webs.

Dweezil, there’s a decent-sized growing body of young men and even some women who see through all of the Empire’s lies, from Lincoln’s war of conquest against the South to its current status as globohomo security guard for Our Greatest Ally. Don’t write off the younger folks yet. And while I’m here, let me also thank Mr Unz for the brilliant American Pravda series, and also to frequent commentators like Wally, Chuck Orloski, Desert Fox and so many others for the thoughts, links, insights and observations.

Truth will triumph eventually, gentlemen. As General Robert E Lee wrote near the end of his life, “It is history that teaches us to hope.” God bless you all,

Yes. Jake is referring to Col Benavides of Texas (among other Tejanos who fought for the CSA) and the Cherokee, commanded by Stand Waite.

Brother Jake, leaving aside the fact that your knowledge of Puritanism and Protestantism is pretty negligible, and likely derived from E Michael Jones, how do you propose to deal with this WASP problem?

Protestantism has gone badly wrong in the last 175 years or so thanks largely to Yankee Unitarians and the Social Gospel and so on. But in the 16th Century there was no shortage of good reasons — probably just as many as today if not more so — to spurn and reject Popery and all its works. You and E Michael Jones seem to believe that Holy Mommy Church is never wrong.

Well, guess what. You and E Michael are delusional. Popery is as corrupt and stupid, albeit in a different way, as Protestantism. The only church that can realistically claim to have preserved Tradition is the Orthodox, particularly the Russian Orthodox Church. It sure as hell ain’t you and your lot.

And just to preempt your next volley: Cromwell did not “allow the Jews” back into England. That was Charles II. There was no shortage of Puritan objections to the readmission. William Prynne, for example. I

You might want to check your data on “rape.” Good place to start would be “Time on the Cross” by Fogelman, which has lots of interesting and poorly-known facts on the subject of “slave rape” by Massa along with a lot of other very thought-provoking factoids. As a teaser, I’ll just say the data is inconsistent with the Current Year Narrative, as represented by (eg) “Django Unchained.”

I used to work with Ms Goldberg at a (((large U.S. media organization))). She pranced around in a high-end wardrobe (Hermes scarves and so on) and was aiming to replace (((the editor in chief.))) When she didn’t get the gig — it went to an Englishman who regularly attends Bilderburg — she quit in a snit and went to National Geo; suffice it to say her editorial vision, such as it is, is not what one would call a shocker to anyone who had the dubious pleasure of working alongside her. Mts Goldberg, and that (((media organization))) is why I tend to get my “news” from Unz, 4chan and ZeroHedge.

Didn’t the IDF get roundly smacked by Hezbollah in Lebanon? And then there are the IDF diaper memes. They just aren’t that tough. Right?

I think you are forgetting a few important things about the South, starting with the oil and gas and chemicals industries along the Gulf Coast. Far as your point about crime: true about diversified urban areas, not the rural bits. Also, we grow more that soybeans and corn for ethanol down here.

But I get a sense that the Tribe may be going over the top. They appear to be desperate to ram this Holocaust narrative down our collective throats.

I believe you’re on to something here. there is a Holocaust museum in a large Southern city near me. Recently there’s been a blitz, so to speak, of billboards and teevee ads encouraging all and sundry to attend to learn about the baleful consequences of ‘hate.”

Why now? Because their POC pets are turning on (((them)))? because they have internal polling showing people are noticing epstein/weinstein/et cetera? resistance to the Iran war noises? It’s all very odd.

I’ve greatly enjoyed and learned from your comments here.

I wasn’t aware Zionist operatives were around in 30 AD. Can you provide a source for this?

Yeah, well, ya know… that’s just Mencken’s opinion, man.

I’m always amused when “brights” like you (to use Dan Dennett’s ridiculous word) lob dear old HL (or George Carlin, the HL for lazy boomers) at believers. It’s about as intellectually compelling as farting in an elevator.

(((Sagan)))

Sorry, couldn’t resist.

They’re already trying to ‘Ron Paul’ her, which means we should support her, CFR, and Zionist associations notwithstanding.

She’s the only one saying ‘Enough!’ to the insanity of Eternal War, as America’s infrastructure crumbles, and our progeny are enslaved to trillions of un-payable debt.

Perhaps there’s no way we can dislodge the Zionist fiend slurping from America’s jugular, but at least we can use our voice to say ‘no’ to it. And support the only person who’s willing to strike at the root, the Eternal Wars for Israel.

Suppose Jews actually should receive attention at a whole order of magnitude higher than they do; that would be 2%. They get a lot more than 2% of our attention, too.

I still say that the Jewish establishment is in large part a distraction. They haven’t the manpower to run the US any more than they had the manpower to run the old USSR.
Try talking to a member of the New England intelligentsia and you’ll find a mindset remarkably similar to that of the old time Abolitionists. “A am a Master of this College. What I don’t know isn’t Knowledge!” is the general approach, and the ideology is remarkably similar to that of the Abolitionists: “This group has been treated badly, by you, you miserable wretch, and I’m going to protect that group even if it means beating you half to death” (or siccing a Twitter mob, these days).

I’ve worked at quite a few colleges, and that was the predominant threat at each and every one of them, even the predominantly Jewish colleges (although they had other hazards). Same with corporations — New Englanders in management were deadly, the sort of rock ribbed and skulled people who gave the windows / mouse system to Apple.

Two of the American Nations (Yankeedom and New Amsterdam, or New England and New York City) have allied to impose the current system upon the rest of the US. While Mexican influence, and that of thee Left Coast (LA to Seattle along a coastal strip) can’t be entirely left out, they’re junior partners. Don’t get distracted by the big noise and obvious foreigners, look at the large and inconspicuous bulk of the largest resistance.

We need a better sense of reality, not the old “Punch and Judy” “bad jews/you’re a racist” business one so often sees.

Counterinsurgency

Agree with this assessment. You know who else benefits from higher crude? Shale producers in Texas. Tension short of war is good for both Iran and Texas.

TUCKER CARLSON IS A HERO

Tucker: US came within minutes of war with Iran

Video Link

You and I are in 100% agreement on this, sir.

I agree it looks dark, but I’m not hopeless. Yet.

Hi Jake. I don’t think you recall, but I’ve been through this with you countless times before. I take it you’re informed by E. Michael Jones? I’m sure he a a fine Catholic, but as a historian of 16th-17th century England he leaves much to be desired, as do you, I’m afraid, as a historian of Protestant doctrine. Both of you sling the “judaizing” label about without any sense of what it means, other than “something not approved by the Pope of Rome/Magisterium.”

As far as my being “way off” on the economic opinions of rural Southerners, is your source again Dr E. Michael Jones? Or your own experience? If it’s the latter, then I reckon you and I are talking to different Southerners. To be honest, I always assumed you were a Catholic somewhere up in the North. My deepest apologies if this is the case.

I’m not sure there’s such a thing as a “Christian Zionist” church. It’s a movement with a big presence among evangelical churches. You can also find, I think, an increasing number of examples of evangelicals who have begin to connect the dots in a proper manner. I don’t think the ideology has much hold on people below a certain age cohort. The nation – including those bits that tend to do the fighting, like rural white Southern boys — have had enough. I think. Not sure this is realized.

As for the Ron Paul connection, there has always been an overlap. I think this is related to the fact that in the South there tends to be an inherent suspicion of Wall St and the sort of financing that’s done there. There’s not a “Ron Paul Coalition of Evangelicals,” but I think in rural Texas, Louisiana and Kentucky (at least) it’s sort of assumed. I think this would be outside the major urban areas though.

Southerner in the putative “heart” of evangelical country here. Somewhat anecdotal, but I’m not sure that the Christian Zionist heresy has the sway among younger folks (say, 45 or less) that it does among older boomer/muh Reagan revolution types. Yes, I’m aware of Hagee and Pence and the rest of the traitorous scum in DC, but they are more oriented toward their (((paymasters))) than, say, the guy that works at the refinery in Baytown or drives a truck out in the Permian.

What doesn’t seem to be widely known (unless you’re down here) is that a lot of the more white/rural churches in the South get their economics via Ron Paul and his school… which means that they’re also exposed to Paul’s thinking on foreign policy. Talk to guys one on one at the brisket joints and elsewhere, and there’s much more suspicion of the “zionist project.” Not in the least because a lot of these lads spent time in the ME/Afghan hellholes, and have had their “patriotic” illusions forcibly removed.

Linh, enormous fan and admirer here. I’ve read all your books/poetry (at least ones I can obtain). LMK if you’re ever in Texas or Louisiana again… I’ll buy you all the bbq and gumbo you can eat.

Anyway, came across this today. It doesn’t address at all the presence of the Chosen in the ranks of the Bolshevik killing cadres. But it’s … something? Or not.

https://mosaicmagazine.com/response/history-ideas/2019/06/why-its-necessary-to-bring-jewish-communism-into-full-view/

You poor thing. Bless your heart.

Can you at least read Nietzsche or Voltaire, to maybe buttress your (((weak))) textual analysis with something that maybe resembles “thinking” above the reptilian level? Maybe even “The Grand Inquisitor” section of Dostoevsky’s Brothers Karamazov, although I fear that may beyond your intellectual capacity, such as it is. There are plenty of solid arguments against Christianity; you do yourself and your (((cause))) a disservice by not deploying any of them.

PS, you’re not white.

In the meantime, you might look over what I’ve written and glean some hints on how to improve your arguments.

I believe Orwell said in the 1940s that “pacifism is de facto support of fascism.” Whether that’s a good or bad thing is beyond me, but I am confident that attacks on Christianity represent a de facto alliance with (((them))).

I’m afraid TelAviv222 isn’t a very good troll, for the following reasons:

1. His “interpretation” of scripture, such as it is, is unique to him alone. I’m familiar with the broad trends of Protestant theology from Calvin through Barth, and knowledgeable in the Russian Orthodox tradition and its patristic sources. Absolutely no one has ever read the texts in his manner, not even the most far-out of the Christian Zionists. His exegetical method, as I’ve said before, smacks of the quibbling sort of word splitting that clogs the (((courts))) and likely originates in the sort of kabbalist nonsense through which people once tried to trick God.

2. Christianity’s contribution to the current plight of civilization over the last 150 or so years cannot be denied. I cannot speak to Catholicism, but mainstream Protestantism, without any sort of adherence to a tradition, fell first to sway of (((modernity))) and now is a feminized gaggle of cucks who applaud there own demise. (Interestingly, the one Protestant tradition that did respect tradition and took an early stand against modernity were the Southerners such as Dabney and Thornhill… memory of whom is being obliterated by the (((narrative of U.S. exceptionalism))).

2a. An exception to the above is the Orthodox Church, in particular the Russian Orthodox Church which from 1917 on underwent the most brutal persecution the faith has ever experienced at the hand of (((modernity))) (which, interestingly enough, chose to crush Russia after first smiting the South.) At any rate, the Russian Church stood firm and as arch-traditionalists, will remain so.

3. While (((mainstream Protestantism))) has abandoned the white working class, and the leadership of the Southern Baptists is increasingly SJW-ized, conservative rural churches remain bastions of strength and community. Indeed, some of these — eg, the Old Regular Baptists of eastern Kentucky — have been the one force able to save people from the scourge of Mr Sackler’s Oxycontin.

4. Nevertheless, the failure of (((institutional Christianity))) over the last 150 years does not negate: Dostoevsky, Wells Cathedral, a spirit of individualism, a sense of beauty. Christian beliefs informed some of our greatest warriors: Cromwell, Robert E Lee, Stonewall Jackson. Nathan B Forrest was a convert in late life. I’ll take that testimony over that of a nasty little troll like TelAviv222.

jacques, with all due respect, since I tend to read your posts, I’m a little surprised you’d endorse anything this wretch would say with a Like.

Hi Rabbi. Great to see you at Schlomy’s bris last night.

I’d invite you to look at the teaching of the Orthodox Church on the issue. It’s very illuminating, especially to see how far the Catholics and Protestants have fallen from the traditional teaching on the matter.

My main argument is that Protestantism itself does not plead any special allegiance to Judaism or Jews in particular. It’s only the evangelicals who interpret the NT that way

I think this is absolutely correct. The Christian Zionist heresy did not gain its force and strength until after WW2 (although Scofield “created” it, more or less, in the late 19th century), and of course has become received evangelical doctrine in the last thirty or so years, related as it is to dispensationalism and other strange Protestant foolishness.

I’d recommend Robert Dabney – the Presbyterian divine who served as Stonewall Jackson’s chief of staff — for a better portrayal of “historical” Protestant theology. (And Dabney was pretty “based”, as 4channers would say, on most subjects.) Of course, no one really knows much about Dabney these days, which would help explain why Protestantism is such a bizarre embarrassment, trapped between Zionists on the one hand and feminized SJWs on the other.

Sir – indeed, it’s simplistic because capturing the various nuances would require more time and space available to me here. However, I stand by my broad brush strokes. And would add that the depiction of Cromwell and the English Puritans as some sort of “judaizing gnostics” that one finds in, for example, E. Michael Jones, reflects Catholic propaganda more so than sober historical research. Jones and others of his school seem inclined to overlook the many good reasons Englishmen (and others) of the 16th and 17th Centuries had to object to the theology and the structure (Magisterium?) of the Catholic Church.

Hi Alden. Cromwell allowing the Jews back in is one of those lies that’s repeated (by historians including (((Simon Schama))) ) but the documentary evidence doesn’t support it.

The causes of the English Civil War are, in my reading, are more of a country vs Court battle that’s not dissimilar to the rural/urban divide of our own day. Cromwell belonged to what might be described as the “gentry Puritan” party (led by the likes of Lord Say, Lord Brooke, Pym and Hampden) that objected to the increasing centralization of national administration by Charles I (which included the “ship money” tax that you reference) and the increasing ritualization of Church of England worship under Archbishop Laud. Laud, with the King’s first minister Strafford, were undertaking a policy known as “thorough” which sought to make the administration of England more like that of France or Spain, which the Puritans quite rightly saw as a move toward absolutist government.

Far as Cromwell in Ireland goes, it’s worth bearing in mind that his campaign (1649) was meant first and foremost meant to put an end to a brutal and bloody Irish civil war that had commenced in 1641 (and which began with a mass butchering of the Protestant population). I believe many of the deaths assigned to Cromwell and the New Model actually occurred during the Civil War period. While his campaign was brutal in the way that 17th century war usually was, it fell short of the sort of rapine and horror one saw in Germany in the 30 Years War under Wallenstein (or in the War of Northern Aggression under criminal scum like Sherman and Sheridan). That’s not to give Cromwell a pass on Ireland, but it’s another example of history being written by the winners.

It’s a complicated subject and period.

Best regards,

and not allowed back in till 1630s by Cromwell?

In the 1630s, Oliver Cromwell was a hypochondriac and downwardly mobile farmer who had lost a position of mild prominence in the backwater town of Huntingdon, and moved his family to a small freehold in the town of St Ives. While his fortunes improved later in the 1630s, he did not gain prominence until 1644, after the battle of Marston Moor: the defeat of the King in the north that was largely the result of the energy of Cromwell and his troops.

Furthermore, the proposition that Cromwell “let the jews back in” simply isn’t true., A letter from Manasseh Ben Israel was delivered to the Lord Protector in 1658 or so and it was promptly sent to a committee, where it died. The allowing back in was done by Charles II.

I don’t disagree with your overall point; I merely think the blame assigned to Cromwell and the English Puritans, for that matter, is overstated. I think he’s best understood as an English nationalist who disliked the foreign influence represented by Popery (Spain and Rome) and Scotland (the Stuarts) in equal measure. The descendants of the American Puritans are another story.

Best regards.

Well, it can be done. Through Orthodoxy, which retains the older and wiser tradition. But it has to be done in a certain manner.

Well said, sir.

And thank you, Dr Giraldi.

I do maintain some hope. Lots of the younger kids don’t buy into the holocaust guilt thing. And a lot are able to see through the Empire’s lies, like the Russians were in the last days of the Soviet empire.

The parasites have drained the nation dry. when I think of the rural Southern boys who fought and died or were mained in those wars — and then to return to struggling communities laid waste by the Sacklers’ oxycontin I could weep. But I think that more are wakening. I hope, at any rate.

Ms Leung doesn’t like being ‘lumped in’ with whites?

I’d like to assure Ms Leung that it’s certainly not whites doing the lumping.

anon339 is a particularly nasty hasbarist whose every attempt at discourse reads of a pilpuling bankruptcy lawyer and talmudist hand-jobbery. Best to ignore; there’s better people here to debate.

Growing up in a small Southern town, the local hung a sign stating they were closed to honor Robert E Lee. Continued doing so for some years. This is a place where a good percentage of country folk have Confederate flag license plates. And guess what? We all get along just fine.

That’s right. Because after all MLK was a True Conservative. Like Harriet Tubman and probably Nat Turner soon enough. David French will explain and instapundit will link.

Quite right, Jake. Mel Bradford and Gene Genovese were on to them before anyone else. I think McPherson’s Battle Cry of Freedom, which institutionalized the imperial myth, marked a real turning point in how the war could be discussed.

Whites have only two modes or choices with Blacks. Servile groveling or the Klan. That’s it. Wish it were different but it is not.

“Slavery was America’s original sin”

And not the shoahing of the native Americans?

And what the hell does that even mean, anyway?

MLK – now there was a KANGZ.

Well I agree but the problem is when push comes to shove most little Jews will follow and cling to the tribe….not many of them can over come the tribal brain washing that tells them they cant trust non Jews to be fair or not hostile to them
That basically rules out any starting point….with any but the most independent thinkers among them.

Imperial Russia had the highest incidence of political terrorism of any country in the world from the 1880s onward, it was only a matter of time that the whole system collapsed.

And you in your naivety believe it was grass root entirely spontaneous and the only reason for it was because Imperial Russia was bad, very baad. This people were sponsored and paid revolutionaries, anarchists and terrorists just like ISIS was set up to destabilize and destroy Syria by outside powers. Russia was targeted for destruction for years and lots of money was being pumped into it and the sponsors were many. Some of them had contradictory motives and did not like each other but they were willing to join forces because the destruction of Imperial Russia was what they wanted. The question is why?

You watched too many Soviet films in your youth. Do you realize that many of the so called documentary films were reenactments? When workers went on strike somebody had to pay them wages so they could support families. Printing press was expensive. Getting weapons was very expensive. Do you think that money came from robbing banks by Koba?

Yep. I doubt Foote would be (((permitted))) today. The Smithsonian has already said (((we))) need a new Burns type documentary to strip out Foote’s perspective, that is to show that Southerners were as bad as Hitler.

The same can be said regarding historiography of the War of Northern Aggression. McPherson’s “Battle Cry of Freedom” is the official imperial narrative, along with Eric Foner on reconstruction. Or idiots like Prager and d’Souza with the “Confederates are just like the democrats” absurdity.

A lot of that production is fake, meant to prop up a mind boggling array of zombie companies. Look up “ghost cities.”

IP: pro-tip here. Anon is a particularly aggressive hasbarist dissension agent. His exegetical style, such as it is, reeks of the Talmud and a third-rate divorce attorney. He’s probably getting paid by the response, so I’d ignore.

“Dumb Goyim” were culled before WWII. In the Jewish Led Soviet Union, commissars slaughtered millions of Christians, while orchestrating mass starvation. WWI was not exactly a garden party. In our current era, abortions are the silent pogrom, and foreign conflicts are now routine, being justified as outgrowths of an endless “War on Terror”. Agenda 21, if you believe the more alarmist assessments of that scheme, features a depopulation campaign to cull BILLIONS of humans under the aegis of “Sustainability”. Apparently, misanthropy is now in vogue, and woe betide those who are in the cross hairs of these Neo-Fascists.

If I can insert a comment, having just read the book. It’s most excellent but in my opinion (bit of an expert on 17thC England) he overstates the Jewish influence on the Puritans. I assume that may be a bit of his Catholicism speaking. At any rate. Great book. Also recommend Reed’s Controversy of Zion.

Anon, I’m not a leftist — not a Republican either, or a “conservative” by the contemporary definition -/ but I agree with about everything you wrote here.

Have you read Lasch’s The True and Only Heaven or any of Eugene Genovese or Mel Bradford’s books on Southern conservatism? Similarly against the financialization of everything. You might like them.

Thanks for the thoughtful post.

To correct you: “Jews (not People) hate the truth about Real History”.

However something that most of the People ignore.
World War II was NOT won by the allies and lost by Hitler.

Jews won World War II and Humanity Lost.

Ver. 22.—Ye worship what (Arabic, whom) ye know not, &c. Here Christ gives a direct answer to the woman, and decides the Jews to be in the right in the controversy concerning the worship of God, condemning the Samaritans as schismatics. He says, You, 0 ye Samaritans, worship ye know not what, because ye worship God together with your Assyrian idols; and associating God as it were with idols, ye worship a false or fictitious God. Again the Samaritans had their own heresies and errors, which S. Epiphanius recapitulates. In the same manner the Turks and Jews worship a God whom they know not, because they deny Him to be in a Trinity of Persons. So also Calvin with his followers, in denying the omnipotence of God, and making Him cruel in condemning some men to hell without any demerit on their part, worship not a true, but a false God. For the true God is Almighty, and most kind.

2. and better. Ye worship, i.e. ye have a method of worship and sacrifice which ye do not know to have proceeded from God. For ye have framed it out of your own imagination, contrary to the will and law of God. But we Jews know what we worship, because we follow the way of worshipping God which was prescribed by Moses.

For salvation, &c. Both because I, Christ, who am the Author of salvation, am not born of the Samaritans, but of the Jews, as well as because the true knowledge and worship of God, which leads men to salvation, formerly emanated from the Jews to the Gentiles, and now in the New Law will emanate from Me, a Jew, to all nations.

The New Testament is a collection of letters written by Catholics to other Catholics in an already existing Catholic Church (The Catholic Church preceded the N.T. ) and it is The Catholic Church
that decided which letters/books would be included in the NT with one of the major criteria for inclusion in the NT was whether of not that letter/book had been read at Mass.

You make it quite clear you imagine yourself an expert in these matters but all you are really doing is bragging in your ignorance. You really have no idea what you are talking about

Yes please, Dr Giraldi!

Yes, I feel foolishly deceived by Trumpism, especially as someone who began almost two decades ago to use the phrase ‘unless an organization is specifically constituted as anti-Semitic, it will be taken over by Jews’. And I don’t for a moment think Hillary would’ve been worse: it’s obvious that the Soros crowd, including the ruling Jews of Honduras, are shit-testing Trump on a massive scale in a way that would never have happened under Hillary. And Trump is failing every test. The only good thing to be said about Trumpism is that it brought the European Nationalist and White Nationalist movements solidly into global awareness, and gave a few million Gen X and Y youth a sense of identity and purpose. I doubt that giant can be put back to sleep, which is a great thing even if, as I see that megahistorical trend now, it was inevitable.

MiiJ:

You are correct. I read somewhere that the Koran also wants unbelievers dead! Therefore, religious books are in a way ordering its followers to be killers.

The Exception is the N.T.

The old testament you are correct. Thus in Hebrews 8:13, the following is stated:

By speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.

So, devout “Christians” who ‘read’ their bibles, i.e. NT, should know better. Sadly, those ‘devout christians’ only pay attention to their ‘pastors’ instead of reading the NT, and informing themselves about the fact the the old testament should be removed and the NT placed as the reading requirement to have christians knowledgeable and to stop learning the hate that talmudists have due to their compliance with their OT. If Christians apply these passages to their brain washed mind, it could free them from their fanatic hatred to what the fake media brain washed them.

Jesus speaking to the ‘jews”

44You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out his desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, refusing to uphold the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, because he is a liar and the father of lies.

Jesus speaking of the ‘jews”

I know your affliction and your poverty—though you are rich! And I am aware of the slander of those who falsely claim to be Jews, but are in fact a synagogue of Satan.

Look at those who belong to the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews but are liars instead. I will make them come and bow down at your feet, and they will know that I love you.

{revelation 2-9 and 3-9}

Christians, LEAVE CHURCHIANITY WHILE YOU CAN!

I believe it’s roughly equivalent to the LGBTQ+communities. Anything short of celebrating gay culture as the highest attainment of western civilization is HATE and BIGOTRY. Similarly, anything short of praising Israel as “the only middle eastern democracy” and so on is the first step to Kristallnacht.

It’s all very tiresome.

Grace, I always enjoy your posts. This one was incredible. Thank you. I’ve always thought about Hitler’s “motivation” in terms of the slaughter of the Linz Regiment at First Ypres in 1914, and wanting to avenge his fallen comrades. But the blockade and the starvation of the children must have been as important as not more. All the best.

The absolute state of what passes for education and “thinking” in the USA. Or Tel Aviv.

Great post. Can I trouble you to elaborate on your idea that the Orthodox think like Berdyaev without necessarily having read Berdyaev?

I am Russian Orthodox (long story – my grandma, from the very minor nobility, escaped the Bolsheviks with Wrangel and ended up in the Deep South, where she met my grandad, a civil engineer of old Anglo-Celtic stock) and now more than ever before I appreciate the clear-headedness of the Orthodox with respect to the JQ.

Well said. I’ve heard for I don’t know how long that plucky little Israel is surrounded by wicked enemies that only want to shoah the chosen. Yet it’s the Semitic peoples of the region – rather than the Khazars – who are on the business end of Uncle Schmuel’s bombs and missiles. And, let’s note, a not inconsiderable number of the aforesaid Semites are Catholic or Orthodox Christians.

You never here Hagee or these rest of those heretics speak to that.

Hi there. I appreciate your response, but this strikes me as a bit strange:

[Israel] know they need to rebuild their reputation with the American people.

We’ve had, just this year, some rabbis in Europe demanding that the New Testament carry warnings of “anti-semitism” (which in the current year seems to mean even the mildest criticism of the Jewish state); professors at Texas A&M (Texas A&M of all places) kvetch that Christianity is “responsible” for anti-semitism, and increasingly strident SJW Jews (Rabbi Darya Ruttenberg, for example) ramping up their attacks on any vestige of “whiteness,” which includes Christianity.

If this is how Jews are going about this reputational rebuilding, then I can’t say I’m looking forward to what’s next. Maybe the evangelicals will completely support a Jewish “edit” of the New Testament. I’m sure a heretical toad like Hagee would.

Far as Obama goes, I believe the historical record will show that their votes went to him more or less four or five to one, so it’s hard for me to feel much sympathy for the Israelis in that context. Yeah, I know, you still get useless boomers like Glenn Reynolds and the clowns that post on Instapundit predicting that this, by God, is the year that Jews see that it’s the GOP that really loves ’em and they’ll all pull the Republican level come 2020 because Democrats are the real anti semites, or whatever. That this is the year that the Jews will realize that the poor, deluded Evangelicals are their best buddies. I’ve heard some version of that for… what, 25 years now? Safe to say, I think, that it isn’t gonna happen.

And as far as Israel itself goes: so Netanyahu’s “payback” is nudging Trump to attack Iran? That is, send more Southern farm boys to die for greater Israel?

The only “existential risk” I see is to what’s left of this shitty nation (the USA). Far as the Israelis go, I’m sorry they settled in such a shit neighborhood (maybe they should stayed in Khazaria) but I’ve yet to hear one single reason why the USA should fight their battles.

Hey there. I’m having trouble reconciling the two ideas in your last graph:

The very idea that POTUS Trump is being led around by the nose by Netanyahu is so absurd it would be embarrassing coming from a middle schooler in social studies class.

and

{Netanyahu] won this time because Israelis weren’t going to throw away his relationship with Trump.

Now why would the good citizens of Our Best Ally not want to “throw away” Bibi’s relationships with Trump? Would it have something to do with the fact that Trump has given Bibi basically everything he’s demanded (and more)? Most importantly, air cover (literally and metaphorically) for whatever they’re doing to the Palestinians?

Thanks in advance for your help.

One that I might recommend is Esau’s Tears by Albert Lindeman. Blood Passover (can’t recall the author) is another.

Probably a conservative Protestant, meaning he worships Israel rather than than Holy Trinity dude. Lot of them are absolutely bloodthirsty in their devotion to Our Best Ally.

Holy crap. The population of Israel relocating to the US? Now that would be a fucking Shoah.

But yeah, if I had to pick any one group of middle easterners to be allies with or even sit down for beer and barbecue, would definitely be the Iranians.

PS, Christian Zionism is a contradiction in terms. It’s nothing more than one of more successful Protestant heresies. Between the SJWs and the Zionists, Protestantism is deader than Elvis. Thank God Orthodoxy (particularly the Russians) have the theological traditions and historical memory to guard against that shit.

I’m Russian Orthodox and the Muslims bother me far, far less — by several orders of magnitude — than the never-ending blood and shit we’re swimming through on behalf of the Jewish state.

Muslims aren’t taking a vanguard role in the destruction and removal of Confederate monuments. Jews are. So fuck them.

If you want to die for MIGA, have at it. Just don’t insult me by telling me it’s my Christian duty to die for those criminals. Lost two close relatives in Iraq, which Netanyahu claimed would come up in roses after the US invasion.

Fuck Bibi and his gangster state. Ditto Trump and all the good little goys in DC.

Go to Breitbart, Instapundit or any of the “conservative” sites and read the comments. While it’s encouraging to see more people waking to the JQ, the bloodthirstiness of the hate against Muslims and Palestinians is absolutely vile. And you can’t but conclude that a lot of those poor deluded bastards are more loyal to the gangster state than the sad rag bag that is the USA.

It’s beyond disgusting and I can only conclude that most GOP voters are choosing delusion. I do think though that younger people are looking at Our Beat Friend and Ally with a more cynical point of view.

Oh yeah and… thank you, Phil Giraldi. One of the few honest men standing.

And fuck Israel and ZOGington.

Shouldn’t it be “whipping’”? I know in the South it’s pronounced “whooping’”.

In my home state of Texas there are holocaust museums in Dallas, San Antonio, El Paso and Houston.

Confederate memorials have been removed from San Antonio (Mayor Ron (((Nirenberg))) ) and Dallas.

Really gets the old noggin joggin’.

But is that due more to the dumbing/numbing down of the American citizenry by the (((media and government schools))) into a bovine kind of catatonic amoral zombie- unable to even consciously comprehend the moral gravity of mass-murder, torture and nation-destroying?

GooD bit of this I’m afraid. Look at the glee with which the institutional Right (eg, Instapundit) cheers on IDF snipers and bemoans “anti Semitism” (which holds the meaning Joe Sobran gave it). And blasts democratic pushing of the collusion narrative while simultaneously banging the neo con war drums against Russia.

That said: it’s my sense that there is a growing weariness with war, the PC cult, LGBT fanaticism and suspicion of the Zionist/Israel thing. Hagee and that crowd don’t have the hold they once did. That’s not to say it doesn’t exist but I tend to think it reflects the professional pastorate more so than congregants.

If the Rothschilds brought america.into the war, why didn’t the german Rothschilds use their influence to keep america out ?!?

Because the Rothschild’s are Jewish supremacists , (Duh) before they’re anyting else.

Being a ‘German’, to a Jewish supremacist is as meaningful as being French or Argentinian. Their putative ‘nationality’ means less than nothing. They may have been born in Germany and live there with a German passport and make nice with their neighbors, but their fealty to anything German, is as deep and abiding as Chuck Schumer’s fealty to America.

If it meant bolstering Israel, Chucky would toss the American people under the bus quicker than building seven could plop into its basement. That took almost seven seconds, whereas Chuck would betray every single American in a New York nanosecond, it he considered it ‘good for the Jews’, to do so. Exactly like a so-called ‘German’ Rothschild.

There were a lot of honorable Jews who fought on the side of Nazi Germany to protect Germany and the German (and honorable Jewish) people from the Zio-Fiend- that had consumed Russia and had its drooling sights set on Europe. But they were not Jewish supremacists, like Rothschild, or Schumer or any so-called “American” Jew, also in possession of an Israeli passport.

(I came late to this party, but this is an excellent and insightful article)

I think the move to call everything about this guy a conspiracy says a lot about those on the right and those who populate sites like 4chan.

These people are so cynical and nihilistic, they can be easily turned against anyone just by pretending to shill for them.

I could make a secret group and plant orders to shill for Tulsi Gabbard and expose myself on purpose just to sink her campaign.

This is a big reason why the alt right and white people in general won’t go anywhere. To get people motivated to do anything, you need optimism and hope.

If we look at all the wars for Israel in the last decades, who has been Israel’s biggest bitch?

it’s like this..

all our lives we’ve been systematically lied to, and told of how virtuous and victimized the Jews always are. And how nefarious their tormentors are, blah, blah, blah..

But how many of the survivors of the USS Liberty feel that way?

Or how many of the First Responders, dying of some horrific malady from breathing all of Larry Silverstein’s asbestos laden thermite dust? Once they come to understand exactly who is was that poisoned them. And why.

From polls, most Americans today don’t believe the official version of 9/11. They know we’re being lied to. Fredo Reed can dissemble and shill all he wants to, but the truth is ebbing out.

And that’s the thing. Fredo no doubt counts his thirty shekels for shilling his rancid lies, but the American people only get tax bills for the seven trillion dollars they’ve spent on the Eternal Wars for Israel. When they’re not burying their loved ones who died or have committed suicide, unable to live with what our government has forced them to do – (murder innocents on behalf of a fiend).

Are the American people dumbed down and clueless? Yes. Are they craven murderers? No, and those suicide numbers are partly proof of their decency.

I knew a guy who served over there, and he told me he shot a boy, (fog of war kind of thing) and that he is going to hell for it.

It’s a very tragic story, and sad too, because the man has since died, and his family has fallen on hardship. Yes, he was duped into fighting on the side of evil, but in the end, his innate decency prevailed and he grieved for that child every day. I’m sure of it. He was wracked by it all.

Anyways, I haven’t utterly given up on the American people. Not yet.

The politicians (sans the Somali woman), are scum, to be sure. But not so the average Joe on the street. IMHO