RSS“Which explains why other ethnic demographics are hardly ever given any meaningful attention by the two-party, two-race establishment.”
What fucking planet are you on? During debates, Democrats were competing as to who could out-Spanish each other. They all raised their hands for giving illegal immigrants health care. Democrats are a monolithic block in not enforcing the border, going so far as to thwart any attempts at enforcement. Oh, so you aren’t mentioned in reparations? Boo hoo. Enjoy your welfare, free school, and clogging of our emergency rooms to get basic healthcare.
So can we get a clearcut answer or not: Does China have a million Uyghurs in “re-education” camps?
So you’re going to completely ignore all the economic development that started with China’s “special economic zones”? Planned economies suck. It was proved over and over again in Marxist country after Marxist country in the twentieth century. Your blinders on this issue is embarrassing.
As for the poverty stats, YOU MISSED MY MAIN POINT. It wasn’t to dispute the poverty rate of children in Hong Kong. It was to find a comparable stat for China, instead of your unsourced “1%”. The only stat I could find regarding China poverty that comes close to 1% is a different measure of poverty, as I explained in my comment.
You really are a hack.
Yep, I saw this as a young adult and didn’t even remember there was a Jewish element to this movie. I remember admiring the protagonist seeking to uncover the scheme (though wondering what authority he actually had investigating this — was it even a crime?), disliking the rich Van Doren, and sympathizing with Stempel. The only Jews I really despised were the show runners, and I didn’t even remember them as Jewish thinking back on this movie. I really liked the movie, though, at the time.
Black Pilled has some good videos going over (((Hollywood))) propaganda in films. Seeing old movies with new eyes.
Yes, very true
Black Pilled has some good videos going over (((Hollywood))) propaganda in films. Seeing old movies with new eyes.
So you’re fighting propaganda with propaganda? Let’s take your stats of China poverty stats at 1% versus 23% for Hong Kong. You don’t list any sources. Searching on my own, I could find a World Bank poverty line of 0.7% for China — at less than $1.90 a day. There’s no comparable stat listed for Hong Kong. The number at less than $5.50 a day for China was 27%. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_percentage_of_population_living_in_poverty
But countries also set their own national poverty lines. This is relative wealth, and a completely different measure from World Bank dollars. Here I can find something more along the line of 20%. Source: https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/so461.jsp
Also, you make the claim that Hong Kong’s wealth had nothing to do with capitalism, but merely as being a gatekeeper into the Chinese market. But you completely ignore that China’s own economic developed soared when they opened up investments and followed a free market capitalist approach. That’s not to say China doesn’t run their own brand of capitalism, but it’s a far cry and opposite approach to their attempts at communism.
Was Farrakhan paying by the word for this gushing puff piece?