The subtext, of course, is there. The planes aren’t being fixed in South Carolina, apparently that would be impossible. They’re flown all the way to Everett to be fixed.

So the cheap low regulation production from South Carolina has failed, unmotivated poor black workers and crappy fatmerican managers (Who probably have Israeli flag bumper stickers) who don’t care about the product either. That’s the real story.

Meanwhile, in fairly demographically stable (Why does Seattle and Washington seem like Canada? Because similar to how Canada didn’t have much of a Great Wave save some Italians and Ukrainians, the Pacific North West didn’t either. Seattle is what America would look like if the Great Wave and subsequent immigration never happened. Not that it’s safe, it’s taking a beating from Asian migration now.) place full of old stock WASPs, Germans and Irish, a sea of blue eyes undisturbed by significant immigration even during the Great Wave, creating high social trust and commitment makes planes people actually want to buy and now also has to fix the borked ones from South Carolina.

The solution is obvious, bite the bullet, give up on South Carolina, you can’t fixed what’s wrong and expand operations in Washington, paying good fair wages to good old stock workers. I don’t know how much cheaper the workers are in South Carolina but even the most greedy and short-term thinking chump in a suit can see they actually cost more in the end.

But that will take so long to do that Boeing will either accept losing massive market share to Airbus and Chinese manufacturers or desperately try to “Everettise” the planes from South Carolina. They have chosen the latter. But it’s doubtful they have the ability to do this properly and so the taint will now seep into the product from Everett too now.

Boeing had a nice setup, a nice big market too expensive for others to enter into in any serious numbers. Their biggest competitor had just lost their big generational bet on the A380 and then we had the Max crisis emerge and on and on it’s been. The people working in Everett took pride in their work but in the post 80s neoliberal age, this was seen as a reputation to mortgage and exploit to pass off crappy product. The people who made that decision were all long gone before it blew up. It’s a critical incitement of shareholder capitalism. It’s not the 18th or 17th century anymore. Companies don’t actually raise any usable capital through shares it’s actually a kind of rentier parasitism that ruins companies over and over.

The purpose of the company goes from doing what they’re doing to paying out to the parasites with shares who claim they built the company when most share offers are made after companies have reached their prime maturity because that’s when you can charge the most. It’s all backwards and giveaway to capital. It’s just a way to configure the economy so these people can buy and steal assets and then run them into the ground.

I think the success of the neocons since 9/11 and their coup and their cousins in the media in forestalling any discussion of Israel has created the false consciousness that Americans are pro-Israel. They really aren’t, they haven’t been since the 80s and the invasion of Lebanon. It seems the success of the novel and film “Exodus” had a kind of “Roots” or “Holocaust” impacts earlier in the 60s but for Israel. It’s interesting that outside trashy Cannon films by those Israeli guys you don’t even see Israel depicted very much at all in Hollywood movies.

Israel thrives through not being noticed by not forcing people to defend it because it’s impossible to do so. It thrives through suppressing anyone talking about Palestinians even when Israel is mentioned. They succeeded very well for over 20 years but October 7th has led to many things but one thing it did do is put the word “Palestinian” and images of them in front of people when they’d been made invisible being quietly ethnically cleansed in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Outside Jews and some crazy Christian Zionists there really isn’t anyone who looks at the situation and takes Israel’s side. And what is currently going on is so much worse than anything they’ve ever done to the Palestinians since 1948.

It’s just that people are successfully suppressed from speaking their mind. But social media allows them to do so now and what’s going on is so insane that people have no choice.

Netayahu et al are really taking their control of the US for granted, they’re making everything too obvious too impossible to ignore and the general public simply doesn’t support any of this madness.

In Mannheim, Germany, a German nationalist group was peacefully protesting when they were attacked by an apparent Islamist terrorist with a knife. Two of the Germans wrestled the attacker to the ground and had him subdued until the police ran up and liberated the Good Guy (the pro-Muslim attacker) from the Bad Guys (the pro-German victims).

Given the context isn’t he less “pro-Muslim” than pro-immigration and thus implicitly anti-German? (Unless the marchers were also being good kosher nationalists and had Israeli flags even though in reality they have more in common with the indigenous Palestinian nationalists than the Israeli immigrant cum settler colonialist nationalists and that’s why he attacked them.)

When national patriotism is less unifying than provoking historically it’s been because your borders are wrong, it’s been a signal of imperialism. Today it’s more likely due to the natives being seen as imperialists in their own country for resisting displacement and invasion by foreigners. Immigration produces the same effective population structure and sociology as centuries of clannish endogamy or an unwieldy empire.

Afterall, where in the world is one more likely to be insulted, attacked and even killed for simply being an ethnic German? In 2024 it’s not France or Russia, it’s Germany. It’s Berlin, what is supposed to be the capital, heart and true expression of the German nation and state. The same can be said for any other European ethnicity thanks to mass migration. The expression of national identity is now offensive rather than unifying.

All of it comes down to the prevailing Weltanschauung.

Whites (Or in the event of significant white immigration, native whites) have no legitimate collective interests or pride only collective shame/guilt and responsibility.

Non-whites (Or additionally in the event of significant white immigration white immigrants) only have legitimate collective interests and pride and no collective shame/guilt or responsibility.

Any shift from this no matter how slight is taken as proof that the advocate is simply purely evil.

An outgrowth of this is that immigrants and those with immigrant-identities even after many generations of ancestry in a place, are permitted and expected to take immigration policy personally. The natives by the same token are absolutely not allowed to take immigration policy personally at all.

An excellent illustration of this is in Canada, the country which has internalised this idea more than any other. It’s taken as obvious that the minister for immigration should themselves be not just of recent immigrant ancestry but of “visible minority” status and should be biased towards less restriction on immigration particularly towards their ethnic kin. Why deliberately appoint them otherwise it’s simply implied they have a special interest through their identity and a certain agenda too that is contrary to somebody with old stock Anglo-Scot or Quebecois ancestry. By doing this, of course, you make it impossible not to acknowledge that there is an inherent conflict of interest between those with immigrant identities and those without.

Canada has even set quite high essentially arbitrary targets for immigration and even set up a plan to “catch up” on immigration lost due to Covid!

I’d like to see somebody bring it up in debates or otherwise. Why shouldn’t the natives take immigration policy personally?

The Onion headline writes itself.

“Trump declared guilty… of something we don’t know what it is either.”

In fact it’s amazing that CNN has been breathless for weeks reporting on something neither they nor their viewers ever understood.

Video Link

This reminds me of the stalking and other actions by the crazy ex-State Department guy and Obama national security adviser Stuart Seldowitz. He went viral for obsessively arguing with an Egyptian food stand vendor in NYC getting caught on film saying that the Israelis hadn’t killed enough children.

“If we killed 4,000 Palestinian kids, it wasn’t enough.”

Seldowitz was deputy director/senior political officer in the U.S. State Department’s Office of Israel and Palestinian Affairs from 1999 to 2003.

Turns out he also stalked Russian embassy and UN diplomats.

https://twitter.com/TheGrayzoneNews/status/1727475678122009064

https://thegrayzone.com/2023/11/22/islamophobic-obama-official-harassed-russian-diplomats

But Seldowitz’s outburst was not an isolated incident. In fact, he’s a personification of the marriage between rank bigotry and the axiomatic extremism of cross factional US foreign policy consensus. Before his rise to internet stardom, Seldowitz spent at least a year maliciously harassing female Russian diplomats and even attempted to menace the dog of Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations, Dmitry Polyanskiy.

The ambassador told The Grayzone that seeing the footage of Seldowitz was a “revelation” for him because he and his team were “harassed by him for more than a year and we couldn’t identify him.”

According to Polyanskiy, Seldowitz even tried to “harass” his dog while on a walk. “Which is too much for me,” the ambassador added.

…

“He was persistent and he was personal. That’s the problem,” Polyanskiy insisted. “We don’t have problems with someone expressing concerns or disagreements with our policies, but when it becomes personal and a person really harasses and stalks women, insulting them, telling them they are ‘whores’ and all these things, this is something that we couldn’t put up with,” he told The Grayzone.

In one video obtained by The Grayzone, Seldowitz can be seen verbally assaulting a person taking a cigarette break outside the Russian mission to the United Nations. Seldowitz refers to the person’s female colleague as “whorish,” then approaches her and asks, “are you one of Putin’s prostitutes?”

These people aren’t just academics who found their way into these roles, they see themselves on a mission.

Here is he with his former boss Albright at the UN. His comment about how the 4000 dead Palestinian children wasn’t enough reminds of Albright’s infamous revelation of just how psychopathic she was.

It’s almost like the war in Ukraine and the slaughter in Gaza/attempted regional war are connected or something…

The contrast between the hyper-ethnocentric Israeli media described by Mercer and the anti-White, utopian, multicultural media in the West, much of it owned and staffed by Jews, couldn’t be greater. Whereas the Israeli media reflect the ethnocentrism of the Israeli public, the media in the West do their best to shape public attitudes, including constant and ever-increasing anti-White messaging

Anthony Blinken who seems to have largely taken control of the White House in the early period of the this madness is the perfect manifestation of this duality. To paraphrase Steve Sailer’s “invade the world, invite the world” mantra. (In reality, invade the world, invite the world… to Europe. Whatever happens expect a suspiciously low amount of Palestinians to be allowed emigrate to the USA.)

Here is Blinken showing he is truly the man of the times. As I and others have observed, Blinken is an anti-diplomat, he doesn’t have the belligerent facade of other top neocons. He looks goofy and affable and seems to model his personal style on Jerry Seinfeld. (Yet we’ve seen what Jerry has had to say lately.) He is largely successful at playing a pretend diplomat somehow always failing to bring things to a negotiated settlement allowing the Biden admin to stave off a lot of pressure by making it seem like they are trying to end the war when war has always been Plan A.

It is his entire professional purpose to sabotage political negotiations to open the door for wars that are “good for the Jews”.

Invade the world. (On behalf of Israel)
https://twitter.com/WalkerBragman/status/1331159077397929985

Invite the world… to Europe. (On behalf of the diaspora)

Video Link

It’s actually amazing how much the Strauss-Howe theory predicts these things.

Trump has always been yuge on rhetorically supporting Israel. But crucially he had little real interest in fighting wars for it. It was his stance on Syria and Iraq that got the neocons to flip out (In addition to his anti-immigration stance) but this is forgotten.

But let him deport them. More deportations is always good and more martyrs to cause resistance to the Israel lobby. The idea that deporting the foreign students involved would do anything to either stop the protests or not intensify them is pure Stupid Party thinking.

The idiot normie cons going Antifa Deranged Syndrome about the anti-genocide protests is insane. Even Joe Rogan has this dumb take! The right has always had a problem with being more attractive to sociopaths and here we see it. Instead of seeing themselves in the Palestinians they see themselves in the Israelis. And they will take the “alt-right” down to hell with Israel. Why ever position yourself to defend the indefensible (Outside proclaiming Jews as the master race) is beyond me. But in a way it represents the collapse of “wokeness” and success of the counter forces. They are now so mainstream straight up idiots hold these views without understanding them. And their lack of understanding inevitably leads to cul-de-sacs like this.

The only person ironically talking about thinking about what you want and to reject political tribalism and aesthetics is Bill Maher calling on liberals to support Jewish tribalism while reject political tribalism. I swear after age 50 every Jewish man becomes like this. It’s all cosmopolitanism and Shiksas while they’re young but afterwards the gentile world has nothing to offer them anymore.

Video Link
If not just the compromised Republican congress and senators go this way but bulk of their voters. Then, well, they’ll be trying to explain and apologise for it for the rest of their lives. Total political implosion for everything associated with them. Bad news for whites. This is shaping up to the be the decisive point in world history for the next hundred years, the total collapse of America as a global hegemon it is losing on all fronts and it’s support of Israel is how it got there and why it’s rapidly losing it all.

The real question is, with Trump likely to win in November will he give them their war if it’s not already ongoing? Or will they fear Trump might just do another Syria. In that case do they kick things off before the election to make sure Trump will finish the war. (He will.) Either way Israel can’t keep this up forever, they don’t have infinite money or military supplies at the rate they’re burning through them, they need Iran v USA or even Syria v USA ASAP. But dumb MAGA hat dudes pushing Trump to support the Jews to “own the libs” doesn’t help either way.

Given how much money Ivanka probably has access to it’s just sad she stays with Kushner. Imagine an alternative reality where Trump’s son in law was Tom Brady. Murdoch’s trophy wife Wendy Deng actually introduced Ivanka and Kushner.

The other thing about the Chinese is that they like the Jews today and various other times the Germans and British have a superiority complex and even thought themselves the core of the world with the outside being full of “barbarians”.

So far we have never seen a country which is so large by population (Only superseded by fractious India), has a massive ethnic diaspora all over the world and which has deep in it’s psyche an idea of being the supreme master race also being the most powerful country in the world.

Right now in 2024 the Chinese are slowly banning education in non-Mandarin languages, particularly Tibetan in an effort to extinguish them.

Libertarians like to think envy of the poor and weak is what makes the world go round but in truth it’s the contempt of the rich and powerful.

What happens when China finally gets over it’s complex about it’s idea of being the supreme people, burned down with the Summer Palace and finds itself the richest and most powerful country in the world with massive ethnic diasporas across the world? Current Chinese leaders, humbled by memories of a very different recent past of China may say and even believe one thing. But what happens when the children who have known nothing but Chinese greatest come to power?

Will we all become Tibetans too?

I’m reminded of the hilariously-titled paper from the Pentagon.

THE STRATEGIC CONSEQUENCES OF CHINESE RACISM: A Strategic Asymmetry for the United States

Is it because of the Jews?

Everything since the Maidan coup has really been about Syria. The neocons lost their minds when the Russians entered the fray and messed up their plans in Syria.

It’s all the same war. On Palestine, on Russia, on us.

On Palestine they drop bombs directly.

On Russia they drop bombs by proxy.

On the West they have to engage in a concealed proxy war through immigration.

I’m waiting to see the hysteric septum-pierced girls on social media who are the power users who control what trend with BPD realise this as events in Gaza demand an explanation and there is only one staring back like a giant monolith. What happens, like with the viral video one of them posted about Bin Laden’s complaints, when they realise what every gentile intellectual of any stature has written on the subject comes to light?

Maybe the Chinese will get it and replace “Dogs of the US Empire” with something a bit more accurate…

Israel faces no such pressures. As the occupying power and Washington’s favourite client state, it can inflict any punishment it chooses on Palestinians with little repercussion.

As all of this demonstrates (As if it needed demonstrating, the last 25 years should have sufficed) it isn’t Israel that’s a client state of the US, the US is a client state of Israel.

Video Link

Video Link

And on Bernie being disappointed with how things have turned out. What did he expect? His job should have been to point out the Israel lobby and throw grenades at the establishment. Why did he so meekly step aside? Is he so old he doesn’t realise he can just record speeches at home and post them on the internet? The hell is he doing on CNN? Why is he pretending CNN has nothing to do with this?

He let his campaign get imploded by young women with septum piercings, he has to have learned something from that?

Once they made Blinken secretary of state their intentions were clear, wars for Israel on the Ukrainian steppe and the Levant.

It’ll be a fascinating demonstration of if the Israel lobby has reached too far in terms of comparing it to last time.

Constant standing ovations (With congressmen clearly not wanting to but seeing how many other were standing and feeling pressured) during the speech and then a long several minute one at the end. It’s surreal how anyone could not see how the old works after this footage. This should have been the critical noticing moment.

Video Link

Long standing ovation at the end.

Video Link

Exactly. For peace Israel must be defeated. Whether this is by peaceful (International boycott and political isolation ala South Africa) or military means doesn’t matter. Change from inside Israel or the Jewish diaspora is not possible. The Israel stockpiles of WMD are truly scary in this respect.

They won’t give up on taking the West Bank (They may forget about Gaza if they can push it back into being incorporated into Egypt) they simply won’t.

A One State Solution is best, over time the Palestinians will reclaim the country both through demography and from Jews leaving. Of course that means the West having to put up with this new large pool of Jews now even including ones from the Middle East who are even more hostile but better that than leave them with their own state to hold the whole world hostage. With any luck they’ll settle into big cities and slowly die out through outmarriage and in-migration from the hinterlands of the cities anyway. It also removes Israel as a willing incubating host for the Haredi who breed like rabbits. (NYC has a serious looming showdown coming over those people constantly claiming whole apartment buildings and growing constantly in number)

Plus what country was ever likely to use a ethnobomb virus to kill all other outgroups but Israel?

Why is so much of Canada’s immigrant population from India might be a better question. 41% of them being Indian might not be too far off from being almost proportional to the total male immigrant population.

Canada has become the promised land ever since the Sikhs being a highly clannish group even by Indian standards began to make a beachhead there in the early 20th century. Their clannishness meant the link to the old country was never really broken with constant immigration and arranged marriages and formed a furrow in time for other non-Sikh Indians to follow.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komagata_Maru_incident

Given the volume the proportion of immigrants with weak legal means to stay in the country but who might be inclined to stay through familiarity or family ties is likely far higher. Given the large Sikh population and the idea of trying to join the army to get legal residence being a “trope” among Indians isn’t surprising. As Steve highlighted recently, they seem particularly aggressive at seeking any way in like the U Visa scandal.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2023/03/06/indian-immigration-to-canada-has-tripled-since-2013

https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/why-indias-population-boom-could-be-major-boon-canada

Emigrating to Canada has become a normal life script for large numbers of youth from India. As I keep explaining, immigration doesn’t just happen at any volume, it begets itself and follows tradition and diasporas. There are likely massive opportunities that “pioneering” immigrants walk past because they don’t want to be valiant pioneers exploring new cultures and economic opportunities, they want to follow others’ examples and hook into family or ethnic networking. Hence the Indian gas station or Sikh truck driver in Canada.

Stop any amount of immigration and you begin to have a process in reverse where it compounds in less and less immigration.

As one guy once joked, Canada used to be full of tall beautiful women, now Toronto is full of short not so pretty Indian and Chinese women.

An ironic aspect of this is that medical schools create artificial scarcity of graduates to keep doctor wages high. If you look at the cutoff points, you could increase the number of graduates significantly before you notice a dip in scores.

Slack from this has been shifted onto importing doctors from abroad to fill the lower ranks. The upshot of this being that places with even more dire need for doctors have them poached to the West. (Infamously there was a period where there were more Somali doctors in Chicago than Somalia) Even worse unlike the US those foreign doctors are almost all educated in public institutions funded with public money. I always thought it showed his own snobbish upper class background well when former Irish PM Leo Varadkar would act like his Indian doctor father abandoning a country that needed him much more and which funded his education for Ireland was somehow noble because all immigration is somehow noble in current year. As always the modern definitions of privilege seem suspiciously designed to omit actual privilege and wealth…

Boldly going halfway around the world to get more money for less work probably does seem noble to somebody from his background. His Irish mother was also a doctor and he went to a very posh private school. He came from the richest background of any leader in the history of the Irish state.

It’s not just those who would have gotten in who aren’t getting their MD cert it’s a vast reserve army of potential medics.

The lack of medical professionals in the West is a man-made problem. In lower-tier elements like lower skilled nurses and nursing home staff the terraforming of the professions by immigrants has made them artificially unattractive to natives in a way that would be ended if immigrants were phased out.

Yes, the white British soldiers belong in Ukraine, the Ukrainians belong in Britain seems to be gist here.

But heartily it seems they are having very real recruitment problems for all branches in recent years. And that is in the current “peacetime” post cold war military. Sans conscription they won’t be able to get their giant new cold war forces filled it seems. Though it remains in doubt if they could ever have paid for it anyway.

Another way to look at it is, if white collective interests were so simultaneously self-evidently non-existent (Non-white ethnicities don’t actually exist! White people don’t even really exist!) and it being such social and economic suicide to assert them. Then why is it so impossible to suffocate the idea? Why does it keep coming up all over the West in response to immigration? Why does the ethnocentrism and sense of being under threat increase with immigration and the decline of their demographics?

Surely it should, like we were told, be the reverse. Why do people keep letting themselves be unpersoned if there was nothing to it?

The normie right in the US and UK tend to think they have more in common with the Israelis when in reality they have more in common with the Palestinians. The Jews who became the Israelis were immigrants who sought to subvert and displace the Palestinians legally socially and demographically. They also don’t get that the Jews in the West look at them not unlike how the Israelis look at the Palestinians too.

The unspoken self-destruction of whole nations and states is that when immigrants and their descendants either through thought-out malice or just dim chips on their shoulders prevent immigration restriction of those of non-native backgrounds on principal what you’ve done is say the country belongs to nobody.

That this will create neoliberal neofeudal mires of misery and empower the wealthy is something Friedman understood but the left is now unable to understand.

Another interesting conflict is currently happening in New Caledonia. After riots and protests in the 80s and 90s the French government made an agreement in 1998 to stop new voters being added to the local rolls whose ancestors weren’t living there prior to 1998 and who have been living there at least 10 years. In practice due to continued immigration of ethnic French and other Pacific Islanders this had the effect of freezing the political displacement of the native Kanaks since the numbers of new immigrants and those descended only from them were continuously increasing.

Macron is dead set on helping ethnic Franks achieve more dominance over natives in foreign lands. In France, not so much. Of course it’s not just ethnic French but also the immigrants from everywhere who stifle Kanak self-determination. Though they come from independent countries the other PIs don’t support independence for New Caledonia.

Macron has now deployed thousands of soldiers and paramilitary police to try to exert control and mitigate embarrassing images during the Paris Olympics.

In general immigrants in nations under foreign control always stifle independence of their new hosts. The same could be said for immigrants in countries that didn’t used to be independent. They would have voted against, refused to fight for or even conspired to stop their independence.

In both the Quebec and Scottish independence votes the central governments sought to fast track citizenship for immigrants on exactly this premise. In both cases due to the tight figures, those immigrants might have been critical in stopping them particularly in Quebec where the numbers were huge who they fast tracked through.

The neocons don’t know how to do peace. Peace isn’t impossible when you have limits to your demands. But they demand total control and dominion of the planet as well as the right to annihilate whole peoples merely for potentially being a threat to their aims of Jewish supremacy. They just keep pushing and pushing. Until Ukraine that worked out well for them. But now they’re playing chicken with nukes and there is no answer to that. (At least not now) But the scorpion can’t change it’s nature.

I think they value having Russia tied down at least so they can go full tilt in the Middle East. You can push to have the war go on for as long as possible. Right now the worst that can happen from the war continuing in a controlled proxy fashion where neither NATO or Russia is inclined to use nukes is that Ukraine gets even more fucked. This isn’t really a cost to them. Hell, an even more fucked up Ukraine even more dependent on the West and with even greater irredentist claims on Russia is more pliable and controllable and a reliable anti-Russia proxy.

In the meantime they can also try to come up with some plan to get out of this hole even if there is no possible rational way to do so.

Of course they also fear what happens when the Russians finally win and how much of the Weltanschauung they use to rule comes down with the Ukrainian army. The great mass of people might have to wake up. And people tend to not be very intellectual politically. They go with the “Strong Horse” ideas. That’s what they truly fear, not the Russians rolling into Paris, Berlin or even Tallinn. They fear the collapse of the Cathedral of Lies.

Soon the spell will be broken.

To paraphrase The Second Coming.

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;

…

And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

Is that beast the fall of the current political cancer and order in the West or is it like Yeats intended, a major world war? These people are crazy, don’t accept losing and see a one state solution, the unavoidable end other than the genocide of the Palestinians, as the end of the world already. Why not risk nuclear war to avert it?

As for normie con Britons and the upper classes of Britain being so hardcore for the war in Ukraine. Nothing can rationally explain it. It’s just another expression of the deep-seated need dominate and destroy some target of social inferiority inherent to the British upper classes. They have a collective sociopathic personality, like Israel. Right now that target is the Russians, with them living off the residual cold war hatred born from a deep hatred of the very idea that a state would even rhetorically criticise the glory of predatory capitalism. It’s also just a sociopathic desire to see a war, kind of like a blood sport to them. Perhaps as in the US, it’s a funneling of patriotic energy into the one acceptable form, waging wars in the name of Israel.

The new recruitment ads for the British army are clearly depicting British soldiers fighting in Ukraine. Though solely evacuating civilians. I suppose showing them fighting the Russians would either be too diplomatically dangerous or bad for recruitment. But ironically it actually just looks like the British army is in a panic running from the Russians.

I notice they’re all dot Indians. In Canada they’ve got the phone scam market covered: it’s always an Indian accent.

As I keep trying to say, a really easy way to clamp down on clannish subcons is to tax the living daylights out of Western Union money transfers and any other company whose logo you see on the windows of Indian-owned stores and clamp down on “English schools”, there are more than enough English speakers in the world, no need to have these suspicious schools that really seem to be fronts for clannish immigration fraud.

Better yet just stop giving student and other visas for the elites and more influential people in countries until they take back their own people and make deportation easy.

A more intellectual systematic approach to dismantling the immigrant infrastructure is needed. The same way immigrants read over every line in the law to come up with these things.

With the imminent European elections there has been a barrage of scandal stories in the media thrown at anyone in the AfD they can find.

The AfD, like all protest parties do very well in European elections and they are expected to come second this year in Germany. This is causing a campaign very similar to the one against the Sweden Democrats in the runup to the Swedish general election in 2014 where after the SD did so well, all the opposition parties were formed into one giant coalition against the SD! (It was a bold strategy Cotton, it did not pay off for anyone, leaving the SD as the only opposition part of any size.) Remember this famous cartoon in a Swedish newspaper owned by a certain family… (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonnier_family) Needless to say it’s also a newspaper for a region with little to no immigration far in the Northern interior of Sweden. Needless to say, it caused quite a stir in Sweden with the image not fit for being published by any of the bigger media but reprinted as “news” since it became a controversy.

Interestingly 5 years later…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2018/04/11/how-trump-is-reacting-to-the-fbi-raid-and-mueller-as-skewered-in-cartoons

The AfD have been growing very quickly in the last 3 years (Disaffection with Ukraine being a prominent reason) as the German establishment has been losing any ground to stand on from both and left and right things have become more urgent and basically all prominent AfD are spied on and attempts to make any scandal stick are constant.

I’ll excerpt from the Politico article. The AfD do very well in local and European elections as befits a protest populist party. And so the efforts by the German establishment (Including the intelligence services who admit to spying on them) to find scandals to hit them with are intensifying. The first step is getting their feet in local and European elections, then the pattern is always greater public acceptance to vote for them in the general elections.

It gives an idea of typical Russiagate hysteria which worked so well against Trump. Just why are all these scandals appearing just before the elections? Also lots of calls to outright ban the party from hysterical people.

https://www.politico.eu/article/far-right-german-mep-maximilian-krah-china-spy-scandal-eu-election

Krah, from the Alternative for Germany party (AfD), announced in Berlin that he would fire the assistant accused of espionage, but that he would not step down as the party’s lead candidate for the European election, just six weeks away.

“If you think this is the end of my candidacy, then I have to disappoint you,” said Krah on Wednesday. “I am and will remain the lead candidate.”

The AfD is currently polling in second place in Germany, but has been beset by a series of scandals in recent months, culminating in the arrest Tuesday of Krah’s aide Jian G., who authorities said was an “employee of a Chinese secret service.”

Krah, now viewed as a liability by many members of his own party, appears set to take a lower profile in the election campaign.

“In order not to damage the election campaign or the reputation of the party, he decided not to take part in the forthcoming election campaign kick-off” in the state of Baden-Württemberg, party leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla announced in a statement Wednesday. “Any influence exerted by foreign states through espionage, as well as any attempt to buy opinions and positions, must be investigated and stopped with the utmost severity.”

Krah is not the only AfD politician to come under scrutiny in connection with investigations into foreign interference.

Petr Bystron, second on the AfD’s list for the EU election, is facing allegations, reported on extensively by the German media outlet Der Spiegel, that he received €20,000 from people with links to Russian President Vladimir Putin in order to spread Kremlin propaganda. Bystron has denied the accusations.

The repeated scandals appear to have damaged the AfD, which has seen its support drop in polls in recent months. The slide began in January in the wake of an investigative report that revealed members of the party were present at a meeting of right-wing extremists in which a “master plan” to deport migrants and “unassimilated citizens” was discussed.

The bombshell arrest of Krah’s assistant has sparked calls from one top European lawmaker — Terry Reintke, lead candidate for the European Greens — for a tougher crackdown on Chinese and Russian infiltrators attempting to influence EU democracy.

Katarina Barley, the Social Democrat’s lead candidate for the EU election, said that she sees the AfD as a security risk. The party being exposed “as an instrument for autocratic powers,” she told the German newspaper Rheinische Post.

What’s funny is that the worst most egregious hate crime in many many decades in the US happened a few months ago. It involved a white American gentile (Presumably, he had a Polish last name, maybe an outside chance he was Jewish) and the media covered it for a day before ignoring it. There was to be no 15 minutes of hate on this particular situation despite it being real, horrific and obviously motivated by ethnicity. It surely ranks as about the worst crime committed by an American white against a non-white from ethnic motivation in what? 50? 70? 80 years?

A 6 year old Palestinian boy was stabbed 26 times to death by his landlord in metro Chicago. His mother was also stabbed a dozen times trying to protect him.

The man was inspired to stab him to death by the coverage of the war in Gaza he was fed by the US MSM.

Interestingly the MSM tried their best to use “Muslim” to describe the child rather than “Palestinian” despite it being obvious he was killed for being Palestinian not merely Muslim. Gotta make lemonade from lemons and push that narrative.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/16/us/chicago-muslim-boy-stabbing-investigation/index.html

Since I’m a white American racist, though, I saw both boxers as white. But I’ve also wondered how and why American boxers lost their dominance. Although black American boxers won five gold medals at the 1952 Olympics, the last black American to snag Olympic gold was Andre Ward in 2004. And scanning Wikipedia’s list of current boxing world champions, I couldn’t find a single white American on the list no matter the weight class. So did Americans get weaker, or did Europeans get t0ugher? And regardless of the answer, why did that happen?

They got better things to do than get their head punched in with very little hope of it leading to the bigtime results that make it worth it.

What happened to all the Jewish American athletes and gangsters? They stopped being born into poor families who supplied the ranks of those professions. (In terms of the gangsters they maybe didn’t really disappear at all, Drexel was basically just Jewish gangsters and generally business nepotism and fraud seem much more common among Jews even from respectable backgrounds. Look at Sam Bankman-Fried and his parents)

Fury comes from a Traveller family and so innately comes from a world of marginalisaiton and poverty and where honour and violence are often celebrated. Travellers are not good at upward mobility.

Similarly Usyk comes from Ukraine, a country where never had the vast pools of poverty and gold chain tracksuit men drained through any economic recovery after 1991. Quite the opposite, Ukraine is the only one of the former Warsaw pact countries which is poorer now than in 1991. It never recovered because it’s corrupt oligarchs were never brought under some kind of control. They just continued to rape the economy and society almost unimpeded.

What happened to white American boxers? Poor white immigration stopped happening en masse for quite a few generations now. With an average athletic edge and a massive edge in terms of communities filled with men who had little chance of earning status through economic means blacks came to dominate the higher tiers of boxing. It’s interesting that we see few Mexican-American boxers at that level. But it seems like they come to prominence in UFC now. Boxing has declined in the US generally much more than elsewhere but it has declined everywhere. There is no Irish-born boxing star. (At least not a man, Katie Taylor was kind of the exhaust fumes of Ireland’s boxing legacy.) But there is Conor McGregor in UFC. (He did try originally to be a boxer though.)

White people in America had better things to do than boxing. The idea that the two biggest heavyweight white stars in 2024 would be from a Traveller family (Boxing has declined massively but still has a big legacy and history in Irish imagination) and Ukraine seems about right.

In the US the kinds of white poverty that exist aren’t the right kinds to produce boxers anymore.

One funny thing about the two is that while they do very different in terms of their mannerisms, height, hair etc. When you look just at their faces and have them wear hats to hide the difference in hair. They look almost the same. It’s a phenotype.

As I’ve pointed out before, the Israelification of the US since 9/11 and the neocon coup have become more and more apparent. The most serious element being that the US can’t be negotiated with anymore, like Israel. The idea of the “mad dog” mentality is now taken as normal. But what happens when the mad dog runs into a madder, more desperate and most crucially, stronger dog?

Since that time the police in the US have been trained in Israel in “counter-terrorism” often with federal funds and sometimes by private money from Jewish oligarchs. But in practice the Israeli police don’t really do 24 style CTU stuff, they just generally act as occupying forces.

Now that we have large protests against Israel they are suddenly acting a lot like Israeli police in addition to just looking like them.

It’s apparent in Europe too. Police used to dress like police and now they’re dressing more and more like jackbooted Israeli “police”.

We’ve seen it in things like using drones to assassinate leaders of groups nonchalantly. Trump even casually killed a high-ranking part of the Iranian military who was also a hugely popular political figure among the general public in Iran, Soleimani. Killing the leadership of your enemy has since ancient times be regarded as foolish at best but savage at worst, a perfect action to perpetuate conflict and make negotiations impossible. Even worse when for the US there is no reason for Iran to be an enemy. The policy used with Iran has worked out so well with the now nuclear armed North Korea.

Prior to the neocon coup the US knew this too. To do it inside another country was even crazier. The Israelis even went further and commissioned a double-tap bombing at a memorial for him. One bomb went off in a crowd and then another went off after people came in the help the wounded from the first blast. The purpose of this, of course, was to provoke the Iranians into a war so the US would fight it for them.

But we see a similar standing by by police in Israel and West Bank while the crazies (Among whom is Sarah Silverman’s sister) are allowed to do what the state can’t quite get away with.

A couple of days ago they were blocking the road to prevent trucks getting in.

Now they’re emboldened by lack of any police action to just loot and destroy the aid itself.

You can really feel the lack of any concern in Sullivan’s voice and face as he attempts to simulate being outraged. But he doesn’t say who he is outraged at. No doubt they’ll “sanction” some settlers or make the Israelis arrest a few after the fact but it’s clear the Israeli police let these things happen. This is government policy to let this happen. Just like it’s government policy in LA to let the Israeli immigrants attack American students at UCLA.

They’ve also been trying to get the UNWRA HQ in East Jerusalem shut down, it seems they’ve succeeded. They slowly escalating from protesting outside the gate to setting fires. Again seemingly without fear of anyone trying to stop them.

One of the core values of Not-The-President Biden’s regime is antisemitism. His team is helping Hamas: (1)

Biden’s Betrayal of Israel Is Worse Than We Thought

President Biden and his senior aides have been making such offers over the last several weeks in hopes they will persuade Israel to conduct a more limited and targeted operation in the southern Gaza city, where some 1.3 million Palestinians are sheltering after fleeing there from other parts of Gaza under Israeli orders. Israel has vowed to go into Rafah with “extreme force,” and this week Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took a number of steps that raised fears at the White House that the long-promised invasion could be materializing.

When you read between the lines, it’s quite clear that the Biden administration is protecting Hamas, is actively withholding information that could bring this war to an end, and is now using vital intelligence as leverage to prevent Israel from conducting an operation Biden doesn’t want them to conduct.

Any intelligence that can help pinpoint the location of Hamas leaders or uncover their terror tunnels should have been promptly shared with Israel. Holding back such critical information is unacceptable, puts Israeli lives at risk, and prolongs the war. Why wasn’t this information immediately shared with Israel when it was first uncovered? Why would Joe Biden protect Hamas terrorists at the expense of our ally, Israel?

PLO Joe is doing this to court Michigan. It is not working. Major polls show Trump is ahead in the Great Lakes State.

It is an impressive lose–lose from the White House occupant. The Veggie-In-Chief’s efforts to undercut Netanyahu, are:

• Not enough to consolidate the pro-genocide Hamas wing of the DNC.
• Pushing American Jewish voters to MAGA in record numbers.

PEACE 😇
__________

(1) https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/05/12/joe-biden-is-protecting-hamas-leaders-n4928978

  
Image from — https://www.zerohedge.com/political/absolute-disaster-media-freaks-trump-dominates-battleground-states

It’s been remarkable how total the circling of the wagons has been. Some of the ones doing it have even surprised me.

They must know how bad the levels of noticing will be. There will just be no way to roll it back or “put it in context”. For the longest time Jews have benefited enormously by obscuring their intense tribalism, identity and influence. How do you call what’s happening a “canard”? People can see even the ones who don’t want to. It’s almost being done to the levels of a scientific experiment.

I’d often wondered just what the line is for Israel. At what point would the power of the Israel lobby be unable to reign control of American politicians and media. At what point would the American politicians decide they have more to lose than gain by standing by “the lobby”. At what point could they no longer get away with it.

It was often assumed, not least of all by the Israelis themselves, at a second Nakba. They could get away with anything up to that. (Hence the settler “facts on the ground” strategy in the West Bank and fraud about a 2 state solution and “peace process”, all designed to just let the Israelis quietly ethnically cleanse the West Bank) In their twisted logic I do really believe the Israelis think the IDF is the “most moral army in the world” or that they have to “fight with one arm tied behind their back”. Because what they want to do is a second Nakba. But they didn’t. Not after the success of the neocons in the 60s and 70s in infiltrating the US state department and deposing the “Arabists”. Not after Israel got nukes. Not after they got Regan to give them 3 billion a year.

Not after the fall of the Soviet Union and Gulf War devastated the Iraq military. Not even after the total neocon coup after 9/11 and after the second Iraq war.

But now we see. There never was a line at all. The power of the Jewish/Israeli lobby is absolute. The proxy war the US is fighting with Russia is ultimately due to that lobby.

But now we see too that the absolute power of that lobby means the US has lost it’s hegemony on the Ukrainian steppe. But it also means nobody is pulling Israel back from the abyss. The dead of Gaza will not have died in vain. For we’re seeing the self-destruction of Israel and Zionism. It cannot survive this and it’s control and influence can’t survive being exposed so totally.

This came in with social media which created a virtual form of young women’s most desired activity. Smartphones made it possible for them to engage in it 24/7. It is essentially the female version of online multiplayer shooters and video games more broadly for boys. (The most successful high profile video game with women is still The Sims series) Remember when the joke was “There are no girls on the internet” and Ron Paul was “The Internet’s Candidate”.

The evolution of social media from it’s initial very siloed form with lots of walls and barriers (Early sites had people wanting to replicate their real world social worlds online. People were concerned with privacy, used pseudonyms etc.) then Facebook came along and suddenly everyone used their real names and were easy to search for and began using it to communicate with and post for larger audiences, even people who lived all over the world. Finally the emergence of things like Twitter, Reddit, Youtube, Instagram and TikTok, centralised platforms that destroyed most older website discussion gone were forums and subforums and independent sites, replaced with a constantly churning bulliten board where an algorithm decided what you saw and clicked on next. The emergence of “scrolling” creates a constant socialisation system unmoored from a girl’s real peers or community (Mass media before could be said to be doing the same thing but to a much less impactful degree) and who is driving this? Not the gen pop. The powerusers of social media are women with cluster B personality disorders.

Prior to social media they were confined to the isolated world of Tumblr but once central social media platforms took off the Tumblr stuff infected there too. Through the same means, a core of dedicated powerusers would make things trend and spread everywhere. Would make buzzwords and memes spread. Would begin to influence how everyone even wrote on platforms.

That is what created this insane 24/7 Salem Witch Trial that has been ongoing since 2014. (The first big election year in the US where Twitter was a big presence)

This insane consuming monoculture then comes to destroy all in it’s path with it’s indoctrinated hipsters and insane fangirls influencing how media and hobbies look and work through this centralised system. It’s what companies and communities look to and then try to cater to. Insecure older marketing ladies now don’t have to fade out as they cease being “with it”, they can watch “it” in real time (They think) on social media and assume this is a good approximation of their general audience. Well, even Ted Lasso was destroyed by doing that.

Hence the emergence of the buzzword “gatekeeping” when people notice and complain about this. It’s similar to the use of “antisemitism” in stifling criticism to people trying to defend themselves and their communities from change or destruction. We see in 2024 an interesting situation where those two forces so in-sync about everything else are now in conflict over Gaza. Which shouldn’t be a surprise but somehow has taken most Western Zionist Jews by surprise. I guess they thought the logic of “For thee and not for me” to make as much self-evident sense to gentiles as it seems to them.

I often also wonder if the likes of Stallman aren’t so much smarter but so much more able to focus on their intellectual pursuits because of their social isolation and alienation. Friends and lovers take up so much time that can be left to reading more and doing more in their field of excellence. Of course, that only applies if other people aren’t so necessary for what they’re doing like mathematics or comp sci.

Much is said of the aphorism “Behind every great man is a woman” but I wonder if that isn’t a cope a kind of inverse of “It is better to have loved and lost” used when people are utterly devastated and used by guys who like their lover and want to think she generally enhances rather than retards his efforts. Of course, a primary motive for any man to achieve anything is in the pursuit of better social status and mating opportunities in the first place as well as keeping them. And depression and isolation don’t tend to improve human motivation or focus much either. But there are people who don’t actually seem to have as much of a desire for human contact either.

Under the current language of psychology these people are termed Schizoid and are well-known for their eccentricity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizoid_personality_disorder
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/schizoid-personality-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20354414

But all that extra time they have not lost to friends and lovers along with less depression from this social isolation might allow them to really achieve and perhaps as importantly, be alone with their own thoughts.

How much does Western civilisation owe to the concept of celibate monks?

The thing here is: these campus protests are a big deal. Along with being important in their own right, they are a big sign of shifting US opinion.

…

There must be some kind of plan here.

I would say they are a sign of shifted US opinion, what the Israelis are doing doesn’t allow for fence sitting, people have their opinion. People born after 1970 outside those indoctrinated by insane Christian Zionism and Jews themselves aren’t pro-Israeli certainly not in terms of what is going on now. What’s different this time is simply the astounding scale of Israeli war crimes and that social media allows for organisation and discourse outside the control of the MSM about said war crimes.

I’ve been saying since the star that Blinken is a fake diplomat. A new kind of neocon who doesn’t present as a hostile psychopath like Rumsfeld, Nuland or the others. He kinds of looks reasonable, even affable, you expect him to have “complicated” opinions on Israel but not support just destroying the whole Gaza strip. But when you dig even a little, it turns out he is a turbo Zionist hyper ethnocentric Jew. In that way he is like Jerry Seinfeld, he doesn’t look like a guy who’d be pro child murder but it turns out when it’s done by an F-16 with a star of David on the tail, suddenly he is. (I recently saw a YouTube video of things he can’t live without, he waited until the very end to bring out his star of David necklace. Suckers, they got the majority of the YouTube money before he announced he is pro genocide!)

Blinken’s job is to pretend to be negotiating or looking for peaceful resolutions but actually his job is to present unreasonable demands, sabotage the negotiations and rely on lazy media consumers and producers to never explain that part. His job is to make it seem like the war isn’t Plan A when it’s the desired outcome. That’s why he publicly said all that about it being a generous deal and Hamas being in the way, that’s not what you say when you negotiate that kind of deal, you don’t insult and undermine the counterparty. You might expect that from the Israelis but not the mediator. You do that when you intend for it to fail to pave the way for war.

Can you name one diplomatic success he has had? Me neither. It’s not possible to negotiate with the US since the neocon coup after 9/11. Because they’re not seeking anything from a perspective of US interests or needs, there is nothing you can give them outside complete submission to Israel. Russia stopped the regime operation in Syria and for that they plunged the West into a massive dangerous proxy war with them. There are no limits. Blinken visits places like Cairo and Amman because it makes it look like those governments under pressure for their appeasement of Israel have forced the mighty Secretary of State to come there and explain himself but that’s all it is, good cop, bad cop theatre.

It’s all like De Gaulle’s famous speech “I understood you!”. It’s easy to mollify people when you pretend to care by listening to them.

I think the plan is what liberal Zionists kind of announced early on. I remember one Labor MK say essentially “Netanyahu needs to flatten Gaza and then resign!”. The plan is for them to go through with it and then make Netanyahu the scapegoat. Ignore the bulk of the population of Israel supporting it. Ignore all the major institutions and politicians left and right supporting it. Ignore the major Jews in the West supporting it. Ignore all the major politicians of the US, UK, France and Germany supporting it. It was actually all just Netanyahu.

That’s the plan on how to rehabilitate Zionism and Israel.

For Netanyahu to avoid such a fate he needs to get the war between the US and Iran. So far Iran isn’t playing ball but can they really stand by and ignore the ethnic cleansing of all of Gaza? Two birds, one stone, get rid of the Gazans and kick off a war with Iran. Given the inability of the US media and establishment to process Israel having any responsibility for it’s actions they will give Netanyahu his war.

Meanwhile in more destruction of the law in the name of Israel’s right to kill as many children as it wants.

Germany has banned Yanis Varoufakis from Germany (A big legal decision given he is an EU citizen entering Germany from inside the Schengen Area) as a security threat! Why? He was to speak at a conference set up by a Jews for peace group in Germany. The German state immediately put a stop to this dangerous event!

This apparently happened 3 weeks ago but now he is suing the German government.

Varoufakis is generally a fake radical who is also generally a massive political failure. But that also means he is “safe” for the MSM to quote and talk to. And he loves himself and loves talking so banning him was a big mistake but also revealing of just how much we’re reaching levels of ShutItDownism that are completely irrational and ultimately helping end the farce of Zionism.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-speech-that-got-me-banned-from-germany/ar-BB1lzlzC

Shill for the Jews.

This should be the perfect example of perspective for the dipshits on the right who think supporting these protests will yield something positive for us.

Another example. $15k reward by NYC mayor and NYPD police chief for anyone who narcs on the dumb teenagers who spray-painted one “Gaza” on a WW1 memorial and those who briefly had Palestinian flags on it. I don’t recall anyone doing the same, particularly in NYC when Floydists sprayed massive amounts of all kinds of stuff on literally every monument they could find across the whole country.

I seem to recall they took down every single statue they demanded.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_monuments_and_memorials_removed_during_the_George_Floyd_protests

https://www.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/364-24/transcript-mayor-adams-up-15-000-reward-information-leading-arrest-and

Fox News’ coverage already led to one the worst hate crimes in US history, the stabbing to death 26 times of a young Palestinian child in Chicago by his landlord. Didn’t hear about it? Funny.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/16/us/chicago-muslim-boy-stabbing-investigation/index.html

Also funny to see the hyperlink. The child was killed specifically for being Palestinian, not merely being Muslim but CNN has it’s narrative.

It’s worth noting that Biden gave his speech, the bill was put forward and the Israelis began attacking Raffah on May 6th, which in 2024 was Yom HaShoah, the secular “high holy day” of Israel to remember the holocaust. What better way than in engaging in ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians from what’s left of their land?

https://www.timeanddate.com/holidays/israel/yom-hashoah

For those wondering, there are two other secular “high holy days” associcted with it coming up.

Yom HaZikaron, the Israeli memorial day for the dead of the IDF. Coming May 13th.
https://www.timeanddate.com/holidays/israel/yom-hazikaron

And then Tom HaAtzmaut, the celebration of the founding of the state on May 14th.

https://www.timeanddate.com/holidays/israel/yom-haatzmaut

Am I the only one wondering if Netanyahu is planning on things happening or ending on these dates?

I also forgot to add this silent immigrant veto is the same dynamic as the idea of merging criticism of Israel or Zionism with antisemitism legally. The same logic holds. Criticism of immigration is criticism of immigrants which is illegitimate since the collective ethnic interests of immigrants is sacrosanct.

We could also see this is the case Steve highlighted about the AfD MP in Germany getting legally in trouble for posting statistics that nobody disputes since the purpose of posting them was ultimately to argue against immigration.

In both cases it means even when the group does something wrong, so long as it’s in a conflict with certain groups or the criticism of it comes from certain groups, they can’t be criticised!

In Israel the reverse holds.

Jews only have legitimate collective interests and pride not collective responsibility or shame/guilt.

Palestinians have no legitimate collective interests and therefore no legitimate pride and only collective responsibility and guilt/shame.

This is obviously being taken to it’s logical end by the destruction of all of Gaza (And aim at ethnically cleansing the population there) and the general gleeful collective punishments the Israel state and army engage in while expecting to be treated like any other country. I’m reminded of Alan Dershowitz calling a proposal by a prominent American Chadad to kill the families of suicide bombers “legitimate” even if he just preferred flattening their village (Probably not because he disagreed but feared the PR) but letting the people leave first. We got a compromise, the destruction of their family members homes. Now the policy has been extended to anyone who is a serious resistor to occupation. But Dersh’s idea has been implemented to an extreme degree in Gaza.

In the US and other Western countries this is obviously very destabilising since it means an effective ethnic conflict and war is being constructed but the most numerous group is denied the right to fight causing the state to essentially betray their interests as a moral imperative day after day, year after year.

In other multiethnic states outside the West the dominant group is never treated like this. See this example I’ve cited before from Singapore where some Indians thought they could treat Singapore like their cousins treat the West and insult the dominant in number (And thus to them overbearing) ethnic Chinese without consequence. This is because those countries try to engage in ethnic power-sharing (Or are in the midst of overt ethnic conflict).

The US I would argue was engaged in defacto ethnic power sharing after the end of the great wave with the supreme court set asides for Catholics and Jews (Of course the very same idea that the collective interests of some groups are to encouraged and some not has led to the Supreme Court now being entirely Catholic and Jewish) and then after the civil rights movement. Blacks were to be granted more presence in decision-making positions to better match their number through affirmative action. But subsequent waves of immigration disrupted this arrangement by making American ethnic politics too complicated and ever changing.

Singapore’s government has accused two YouTubers of making a “blatantly racist rap video” in an ongoing row over an ad which the rappers describe as racist.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49205225

The essential highest moral logic of the US since around 1968 and increasingly across the greater Western world is simple.

Whites (Or if in Europe the indigenous non-immgrant whites, a form of non-white privilege is granted to all immigrants including white ones.) do not have legitimate collective interests or therefore pride, only collective responsibilities and shame/guilt.

Non-whites (Or if in Europe, immigrant whites, particularly those from the East. The same Polish ethnocentrism that is so ugly in Poland becomes a virtue in London) only have legitimate collective interests and pride and no collective responsibilities or shame/guilt.

This is not perfect and there are times the moral logic has to contort itself when non-whites get into conflict (Often by simply ignoring it) but this is essentially the highest moral paradigm of this new religion. It even has saints like Nelson Mandela. (Anytime a celebrity has the question posed “Who was the most exciting person you ever met” it is always Mandela) And devils like Trump.

The reason this has been so successful is not merely it being trumpeted by the most influential elements of the media, principally Jewish ones but also because the consequences of it lag significantly. People who don’t have young children don’t notice the demographic transition in the native born population. People who don’t live in certain areas ditto.

But also the lag itself causes this. Essentially people sign up to it initially because they are demographically secure. It never enters into their minds that non-white immigration will just keep going until it’s stopped, their country becomes undesirable for immigrants or if not stopped their group gets totally ethnically cleansed. So in a sense their ethnic group and it’s collective rights are seen as secure even overbearing and safe to relax. The outside groups and their expressions which implicitly nullify the right of ownership of the original group to the country are seen as safe to entertain. The immigrants are seen like kid brothers, not as a threat of ethnic displacement be it socially, politically or even spatially.

So defenses which shouldn’t be brought down are not brought down because the ultimately consequences don’t cause deep atavistic anxiety in the public but because they don’t think they’ll ever be made to pay the price once they make expressions of their ethnic interests illegitimate. Remember things like this were historically tied to wars and invasions where the legitimacy of resistance is seen as absolute. As Jean Raspail pondered, what happens when they come and ask the questions we’ve been told there is only one moral answer to? Of course even Raspail had them using violence eventually, even he couldn’t imagine they could just walk in like they did in 2015. Nobody ever thinks the questions of the ultimate logic will be asked, that the ownership of the country by or even the legitimacy to resist ethnic displacement by the natives will ever be tested.

The problem is, once immigration has gone so far to really notice the immigrants and more importantly their descendants become influential enough to make it hard to introduce restrictions. So you go from a situation where you don’t introduce restrictions because (So far) the immigrants are too few to one where you can’t because they are too many.

And the key problem is what I call the silent immigrant veto. When immigrants and (More importantly) their descendants are too dense on the group the natives clam up about their opinions, they don’t feel free to talk about it amongst each other. This also extends to the media. So what goes unsaid goes undebated. What goes undebated goes unlegislated.

It’s so funny how the Western countries that are acting like this, the US, France, the UK, Netherlands and Germany are all places with big and influential Jewish populations (Or in Germany’s case, the guilt trip from their long shadow) but when we look at other European countries without any significant Jewish population nobody seems to think police action is warranted for a bunch of 20 year olds quietly sitting in grass protesting genocide.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/5/8/support-from-lecturers-and-no-arrests-as-spanish-students-rally-for-gaza

I don’t know why I’m posting these pictures from Antwerp in 2015 after the big terror attacks in Brussels by people the Jews were initially enthusiastic about importing who were mad about crimes ultimately committed in the names of the same Jews. Or how the little boy is likely taught those soldiers are his inferiors whose role is to serve him.

I also don’t know why I’m posting this picture of a cuckoo in a warbler nest.

What’s interesting to note is that it’s similar to what’s happening in Israel and even East Jerusalem. An Israeli MK actually called for violence against the UNRWA HQ in East Jerusalem and it happened.

https://twitter.com/UNLazzarini/status/1787924400785834336

Why are the LAPD and NYPD so ineffective at stopping attacks on the protestors (A mass attack by non-students on students on UCLA property? Seems like a serious public order incident.) but so effective at rounding them up?

Just in. A relative of Meir Kahane just ran down one of the anti-genocide protestors putting them in the hospital. Kahane of course founded the Kach party, which was a single issue party. That issue was genocide the Palestinians. He is also famous for serious acts of attempted serious terrorism (Including a few in New York where he attempted several attacks on Soviet diplomatic targets) and planned massacres of Palestinians. He is also famous for being shot to death in NYC.

https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBDS/status/1787917915527778406

Once again, New York City is not safe to protest genocide in if the genociders are Jews.

It’s worth noting that Columbia put in place a demand in their document they wanted for amnesty to protestors that they weren’t allowed to protest until summer of 2025.

Now maybe they were just trying to cover themselves. But do they (Or rather their donors) know something about how likely this is to turn into the regional war the Israelis want?

Johnathan Cook has suggested the Israelis will open passages for women and children and the remaining “military-aged men” will all be seen as legitimate targets in order to make sure they “wipe out Hamas”. Seems like it’s something Hezbollah, Syria and Iran can’t ignore. They have to go to war. The US won’t stop the Israelis.

Also just in time for the Eurovision Song Contest. The contest is being held in Malmo too. I suspect that maybe, just maybe, the crowd might openly express it’s distaste with Israel. Live on TV with hundreds of millions in Europe watching.

I haven’t been to Europe in a long time. Has an inveterate noticer of crime statistics, how much at risk am I of getting arrested for posting graphs of CDC homicide death data on Twitter? Are some European countries less risky than others?

When it comes to matters like this Germany is obviously, in it’s own universe. I can see their logic in that, it doesn’t matter that he was citing undisputed statistics, it was his intention by citing them to suggest immigration restriction. It’s of a piece with the general idea of getting criticism of Israel made a hate crime. Anything said that is critical of immigrants or immigration is also a hate crime, including citing statistics that support your argument. It’s the weltanschauung of the times. And, if we’re being serious, it’s been that way for de facto nearly 2 generations. It’s just being de jure enshrined now.

But it’s also crucial to note the ongoing desperate attempts to destroy and undermine the AfD. The hysteria and plain ignoring of all law and procedure to take them down is reminiscent to what was done to Le Pen senior or more recently the media campaign against the Sweden Democrats in the early to mid 2010s when they beginning to make crucial headway.

The AfD have been growing very quickly in the last 3 years (Disaffection with Ukraine being a prominent reason) as the German establishment has been losing any ground to stand on from both and left and right things have become more urgent and basically all prominent AfD are spied on and attempts to make any scandal stick are constant.

A good example is the recent scandal over an aide in the European parliament turning out to be a spy for China. The aide was employed by the head AfD MEP.

The name of the AfD MEP and that they were an AfD member was prominent in all media coverage of this. The implication intended was that this guy was some horrible AfDer who like all the populists was cosy with authoritarian states and was a fake nationalist who sold secrets to China. His name was not Hans Schimdt, it was, buried deep in all the pieces, Jian G.

So while the scandal tarred the AfD MEP it highlighted that the AfD should just hire ethnic Germans and even Chinese who work for the AfD and have acquired German citizenship are still more loyal to China. It is a good argument against immigration.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/23/afd-politician-employee-arrested-germany-on-suspicion-of-spying-for-china

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/23/china-slams-germanys-arrest-of-far-right-afd-staffer-on-espionage-charges

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/report-staffer-germanys-afd-arrested-over-china-espionage-suspicions-2024-04-23

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/23/europe/germany-china-spying-arrest-eu-parliament-intl/index.html

https://www.politico.eu/article/far-right-german-mep-maximilian-krah-china-spy-scandal-eu-election

I’ll excerpt from the Politico article. The AfD do very well in local and European elections as befits a protest populist party. And so the efforts by the German establishment (Including the intelligence services who admit to spying on them) to find scandals to hit them with are intensifying.

It gives an idea of typical Russiagate hysteria which worked so well against Trump. Just why are all these scandals appearing just before the elections?

Krah, from the Alternative for Germany party (AfD), announced in Berlin that he would fire the assistant accused of espionage, but that he would not step down as the party’s lead candidate for the European election, just six weeks away.

“If you think this is the end of my candidacy, then I have to disappoint you,” said Krah on Wednesday. “I am and will remain the lead candidate.”

The AfD is currently polling in second place in Germany, but has been beset by a series of scandals in recent months, culminating in the arrest Tuesday of Krah’s aide Jian G., who authorities said was an “employee of a Chinese secret service.”

Krah, now viewed as a liability by many members of his own party, appears set to take a lower profile in the election campaign.

“In order not to damage the election campaign or the reputation of the party, he decided not to take part in the forthcoming election campaign kick-off” in the state of Baden-Württemberg, party leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla announced in a statement Wednesday. “Any influence exerted by foreign states through espionage, as well as any attempt to buy opinions and positions, must be investigated and stopped with the utmost severity.”

Krah is not the only AfD politician to come under scrutiny in connection with investigations into foreign interference.

Petr Bystron, second on the AfD’s list for the EU election, is facing allegations, reported on extensively by the German media outlet Der Spiegel, that he received €20,000 from people with links to Russian President Vladimir Putin in order to spread Kremlin propaganda. Bystron has denied the accusations.

The repeated scandals appear to have damaged the AfD, which has seen its support drop in polls in recent months. The slide began in January in the wake of an investigative report that revealed members of the party were present at a meeting of right-wing extremists in which a “master plan” to deport migrants and “unassimilated citizens” was discussed.

The bombshell arrest of Krah’s assistant has sparked calls from one top European lawmaker — Terry Reintke, lead candidate for the European Greens — for a tougher crackdown on Chinese and Russian infiltrators attempting to influence EU democracy.

Katarina Barley, the Social Democrat’s lead candidate for the EU election, said that she sees the AfD as a security risk. The party being exposed “as an instrument for autocratic powers,” she told the German newspaper Rheinische Post.

So bare all this in mind in terms of the timing and desperation.

I was going through the now only wayback machine website “Jewish Tribal Review” and was pretty shocked at some of the stuff there. It was the original site that made me see that Israeli attitudes were not merely the product of it being a settler colonial state.

I was lucky, I was able to see as a mid adolescent the truth. I can’t imagine the amount of confusion and moral tension that must have befallen others over the last 8 years.

Anyway, prior to the Israelis having adopted the policy of bulldozing the homes of suicide bombers (A policy now extended to seemingly anyone who resists them) there was a debate that maybe the families themselves should be murdered! And it was proposed by an (((American))) who was apparently on track to a federal judgeship. (He didn’t get it after this, but this was 2002.) But he did enjoy the privilege of going before the Supreme Court many times more.

https://web.archive.org/web/20080129151824/http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/ethno.htm

“A prominent Washington attorney and Jewish communal leader is calling for the execution of family members of suicide bombers. Nathan Lewin, an oft-mentioned candidate for a federal judgeship and legal advisor to several Orthodox organizations, told the Forward that such a policy would provide a much-needed deterrent against suicide attacks. Under the proposal, which Lewin unveiled in the current issue of the opinion journal Sh’ma, family members would be spared if they immediately condemned the bombing and refused financial compensation for the loss of their relative. (Lewin’s article appears on the web at http://www.shma.com/may02/nathan.htm.) While a 20-month spate of suicide bombings has been met in the Jewish community with calls for increasingly Draconian preventive measures, Lewin appears to be the first Jewish communal leader to approve publicly of the concept of executing innocent civilians in the hopes of curbing terrorism … Lewin argued that the biblical injunction to destroy the ancient tribe of Amalek serves as a precedent in Judaism for taking measures that are ‘ordinarily unacceptable’ in the face of a mortal threat … Several leading Jewish figures, including Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz, argued that the plan represented a legitimate if flawed attempt to strike a balance between preventing terrorism and preserving democratic norms. But the proposal was strongly condemned by the head of the Reform movement, Rabbi Eric Yoffie, and the executive vice chairwoman of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Hannah Rosenthal … In an article that appeared in the Sh’ma journal alongside Lewin’s essay, Brandeis University Jewish studies professor Arthur Green wrote, ‘I only wonder how long it will take [Lewin], by the force of this proof-text, to go all the way and suggest that the Palestinian nation as a whole has earned the fate of Amalek [genocide]’ … Dershowitz and Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, rejected the notion that Lewin should be elbowed out of communal life. They argued that his proposal represented a legitimate attempt to forge a policy for stopping terrorism. Foxman declined to take a stand on the actual proposal, citing his policy of deferring to Jerusalem on Israeli security issues. Though they declined to endorse the controversial proposal, top officials at the O.U. and Agudath Israel of America, for whom Lewin has done legal work, expressed sympathy for Lewin’s efforts to curb what they described as an unprecedented wave of suicide attacks in Israel. ‘[Lewin] is not a Kahanist; he is not a nut,’ said Richard Stone, chair of the O.U.’s Institute of Public Affairs … Rabbi William Altshul, headmaster of the Melvin J. Berman Hebrew Academy, a Modern Orthodox Jewish day school in Washington, D.C., told the Forward that he did not regret the decision to honor Lewin this week at the school’s annual dinner … Even as several observers rejected the notion of blackballing Lewin, they offered substantive critiques of his argument. Dershowitz, author of ‘Why Terrorism Works’ (Yale University Press, 2002), and terrorism researcher Steven Emerson, who both favor the limited use of torture to extract information about an impending terrorist attack, said that they balked at the execution of innocent civilians … Dershowitz argued that the same level of deterrence could be achieved by leveling the villages of suicide bombers after the residents had been given a chance to evacuate (an idea Lewin disparagingly likened to “using aspirin to treat brain cancer”). Rabbi Steven Pruzansky of Orthodox Congregation Bnai Yeshurun in Teaneck, N.J., a trained lawyer known for hawkish views on Israeli security issues, argued that a policy of mass deportations, rather than executions, could serve as an effective, but less deadly, deterrent against future attacks. Several observers defended Lewin by noting that the United States killed tens of thousands of civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.”

Well, of course, Dersh’s plan was not implemented and only the homes of the parents and relatives of the bombers and later, any effective resistors were destroyed by the occupying power. Now we see that Israel is implementing Dersh’s plan on an epic scale, they’ve destroyed all of Gaza.

I also imagine that the nuke drops would be seen rather differently if done after say the US had defeated and subdued the Japanese and begun to oppress and ethnically cleanse them. And during this military occupation decided to destroy Hiroshima in punishment to Japanese resistance fighters. Not to say they’ve exactly been free form criticism, nor any of the allied bombing of civilian cities. Even in the angry period of just after the war people could see the evil of the bombing of Dresden.

It is, of course, over for Israel, we’re just debating how many they take them with Zionism. And it’s been over since at least 67′ and the beginning of the occupations.

In general the second intifada seemed to make the Israelis go crazy. The sense that it would bring them their defeat was acute enough for the famous Martin van Creveld to say this infamous quote:

We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: ‘Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.’ I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.

Another good one from JTR. He almost got the date right, 2028 might turn out to be right.

According to local journalists, the violent mob had been organized and paid by pro-Israel billionaire Bill Ackman.

Per his wikipedia page.

In 1988, he received a Bachelor of Arts degree magna cum laude in social studies from Harvard College. His thesis was titled Scaling the Ivy Wall: The Jewish and Asian American Experience in Harvard Admissions.

It reminds me of the joke from the 60s or 50s about 3 small boys asked to write a report on Giraffes. Little Billy Smith writes about the giraffes long legs. Little Billy Sullivan writes about their long necks. Little Billy Cohen writes “The Giraffes and the Jews: 6,000 years of persecution”.

Not alone the dead of Gaza or the beat student protestors should be held as the keys to this new enlightenment but the “early life history” and “personal life” sections of wiki biographies.

My own eyes were opened by the old website “Jewish Tribal Review” in the mid to late 2000s. One day after seeing the Israeli army spokesman one too many times being a psycho while being interviewed by a journalist about the latest warcrimes I just typed “Israeli psychology” to try and understand why they were so energetically evil and pushy.

I had learned early in all this that Cindy McCain was head of the WFP and just assumed she was there to enable the famine. Maybe she was but either way it’s telling she is saying this now.

But keep in mind, it’s still not bad for the agenda. The agenda isn’t to push the word and idea of Israel starving these people but merely to import the word and idea of “famine” as if it was a natural disaster to put pressure to let the Gazans into Egypt. (And from there the West.)

France is like 30% Arab.

Somehow, they are just as extreme as the United States when it comes to banning people from complaining about Jews slaughtering tens of thousands of children.

It’s almost like Jews control the entire Western world.

The only statistic that matters is the percentage of Jews and their total number and wealth. On that count France is only second to the USA (Henri Levy Strauss is still treated as a serious public intellectual no matter how old he is and still wearing an open shirt) in the Western world. Next would be the UK. Despite Germany no longer having much of a Jewish population the guilt trip from why is if anything more powerful than a large influential Jewish population.

Besides, 10 Jews with net worth over 70m is worth millions and millions of poor influential Arabs. They only gain influence when they riot. And so far they haven’t.

See Spain for a larger European country without many Jews, it’s actions on all this have been very different despite the importance of keeping the likes of them onside.

I’m sure it has nothing to do with the current nature of the student protest at all. As Steve has spent a long time making the point, wokeness is good for the diaspora Jews for Israel it was always a matter of time since it was 2014 (When social media began to become dominated by teenage girls and “wokeness” began to emerge from it’s dark corner on Tumblr) that last saw Israel engaging in big overt bombings and war crimes (As opposed to their more covert actions of slowly strangling and ethnically cleansing the West Bank.) before the greater freedom of social media and this machine of woke activism would become it’s greatest threat. Afterall, all the false critiques they make about Western countries are not only true of Israel but cartoonishly and innately true of Israel.

Bari Weiss tried to warn them but all too late. #DefundTheIDF only has to trend once. So now we’re at the “shut it down” stage where we have to pivot around the real problem being that these people think the genocide of the Gazans is wrong. When wokeness became anti-genocide that’s where it wrong!

Shapiro et al have kind of succeeded, the likes of Joe Rogan feels like he has to criticise the student protests as “woke” and “stupid” because he simply sees them as BLM circa 2020. People are foolish and see things superficially. People are stupid, they pick political teams rather than political objectives and ends. We see this is in the perfect mirror images of global warming denial and people who deny immigration is actually bad for the economy and the pre-existing population. Both of them know they won’t win an argument of “I don’t care about the negative collective consequences” so instead they argue “Actually that isn’t real/happening” because the solutions would involve public policy they are ideologically against.

Who says it could only be Boeing? They make more than civilian aircraft. The company’s well-being is important to a lot of actors.

No mention how essentially corrupt and wrong the very idea (How can you have a chummy luvie party every year with the people you’re supposed to hold to account?) of a White House Correspondents Dinner is can go without this clip of Bush II joking and the audience laughing about his (And their) lies about WMD.

We need to end military assistance to other countries because it brings little benefit to us. In the case of Muslims, our foreign meddling already led to blowback on 9/11.

Unless you explain who it does bring benefit to there is no chance of having it stop.

The US funds the Egyptian military because it wants a powerful military built on a patronage network they control to stop democracy and thus a regime that won’t stand up to Israel.

The US funds Ukraine because it never wants the war with Russia to end (The idea anyone in DC cares about Ukraine is insane) so Russia can’t intervene in the Middle East to counterbalance the US like it did with Syria which caused the neocons to use their fucking minds and run headlong into what looks like a decisive defeat for American hegemony. All they can do is just prolong the war to tie the Russians down. Like I’ve said before, 10 dead Ukrainians to produce 1 dead Russian is 1 dead Russian for free for them. The US isn’t even getting the refugees, Western Europe gets all of those.

The US funds Israel for obvious reasons.

But if you don’t mention it’s all for Israel and who the neocons are, sociopathic (Is there any one of the Strussians or Struass himself who had a trace of human empathy and who didn’t seem to be a sadist?) Jewish zionists who have set out to and succeeded in taking key control of US foreign policy in service to their sense of Israel being able to achieve it’s dreams of Greater Israel and generally attack and degrade the enemies Israel makes on the way. Then they will just get away with it.

The normie cons will tire of funding the Ukrainian “losers” but they’ll quickly fall for the next money pit as they get off on using US or proxy forces to kill people they’re told are acceptable targets.

You need to point out the true promoters of this or else they get away with it, no pressure is brought on them, nobody forces them to defend or explain themselves or their actions. That’s what ends things like this. And most crucially, that these people also love open borders to ethnically cleanse a country they have no chance of demographically dominating goes unnoticed. It’s all the same war on Palestine, on Russia and on the West. It’s just the means are different.

David Pugliese (right), a military reporter in Ottawa for the Ottawa Citizen and National Post syndicate, has been reporting on the sex scandals and abuse of women which have forced the retirements of several Canadian military commanders, and a cancelled rape prosecution for Lieutenant General Trevor Cadieu, an advisor on tank and artillery operations in the Ukraine.

It’s worth noting that Cadieu almost got made head of the Canadian army. The rape allegations from a then fellow cadet were triggered by her learning about this. Weirdly despite the credible allegations and being a prominent public figure Cadieu was able to slip away and board a transatlantic flight! And he then resurfaced in Ukraine. It’s actually crazy that a man who was about to be appointed the head of the Canadian army was a few weeks later in Ukraine.

I don’t know there has been any update from him since July 2022. It’s not at all certain he is still alive or not captured. (A juicy prize for the Russians indeed taking a NATO officer so senior)

“Kearney was one of the few military officers taking issue with the speech. He wrote on Facebook that the Vimy Gala ‘was sullied with arrogance, entitlement, and not in keeping with the humility & spirit of the event. more senior folks, (retired & serving), will speak out in the future. Canada deserves better.’ ”

It’s held near armistice day every year and, of course, named for the Vimy ridge the site of the eponymous battle that was such a famous Canadian victory in WW1. (A feel-good story of militarism rather than the more typical tale of massive casualties) The transformation of Remembrance and Armistice day ceremonies from anti-war to pro-war has been staggering. They hold at during those days but not during the actual anniversary period of the battle in April. The red poppy is today a symbol of support for ongoing neocon wars and militarism in general in total violation of it’s original meaning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_poppy#Controversy_and_protest

Bari Weiss’ resignation, supposedly to oppose “wokeness” in general was clearly a kite for zionists to warn them about this. “What will we do when the eye of wokeness turns on Israel? How do we stop #DefundTheIDF from trending? We have to shut it down!” Interestingly none of the MSM dared to mention this obviously important context. Steve once collected the best examples of the Jewish Gen X lesbian formerly married to Kate McKinnon Amalek-posting revealing her actual problem with wokeness.

https://www.unz.com/isteve/my-favorite-bari-weiss-tweet

There are three things which make this novel.

1. The scale and length of Israeli atrocities and the scale of US involvement, either by the heavily Jewish and neocon Biden admin (A kind of counter-revolutionary movement against the extremely rhetorically Zionist but anti-neocon war in Syria and war on Russian Trump admin.) experienced the same crazed hysteria other Jews did (All of Biden’s daughter and son in laws are/were Jewish.) and just sent over 2 carriers and endless weapons and rhetoric support as if the Hamas attack in any sane world represented a greater military threat to Israel. (Outside one motivated by an insane response by Israel) Alternatively the neocon side of things saw the opening was there for the regional war and one last hurrah against Syria and Iran. Outright committing a second Nakba has always been the supposed red line that Israel couldn’t get away with but now they’re at it and the US is helping them any way it can.

2. The last time it was really big warcrimes o’clock for Israel was in 2014. During the 6-7 week Gaza “War” where *checks notes* 67 IDF soldiers and 5 Israeli civilians (And 1 Thai migrant worker) died and over 2100 Gazans, mostly civilians, died. This was just before the real emergence of the “Great Awokening”, the continuing casual polticisation of social media in the US with the mid-term elections of 2014. So we haven’t had Israel bombing stuff at this scale during that age of wokeness until now.

3. The intensity of the police response (To say nothing of where the new tone of anti-protest policing came from with the training being given by Israeli police and IDF over the last 20 years) and general expressions of the Israel and Jewish lobbies has been naked in the extreme. Particularly since it’s very easy to make comparisons to how the Floydists were treated in 2020. The power of these power structures is in their being hidden, nobody will ever say anything about Blinken’s ethnicity in terms of how it impacts his work even when he goes to Israel and says he comes there “As a Jew”. The key thing to understand is most normies don’t actually know the full extent of the support for Israel uber alles among Jews in the West. (Contra the paranoid or disingenuous Zionists who want to further the idea that criticism of Israel is hate speech. People really do make a distinction. But they’ll make less and less of a distinction as this goes on as they notice.) Many of them don’t know about the neocon conspiracy. It’s just a sea of things to notice now, it’s all out in the open and in your face.

Take this farce that took place in the British parliament. The current Labour leader who was installed after a Zionist coup replaced Corbyn after years of them insanely claiming he was antisemitic and enabling it and is a paid up tool of the lobby goes to the supposedly impartial speaker and gets him (Also a tool of the lobby, the son of the founder of the Labour Friends of Israel group) to throw out all procedure and impartiality to ensure no vote on a real ceasefire demand is put before the Labour party since it would exposed the rift between the bulk of the MPs and members and the senior leadership. It caused a massive freakout in parliament and the speaker went to hide and there was even talk of cutting the TV feed.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-parliament-descends-into-chaos-over-gaza-ceasefire-vote-2024-02-21

It’s all out in the open. I remember when CNN and Wolf Blitzer breathlessly told us about the first scandal of the Trump admin, taking place before he was even inaugurated. Kushner had had meetings with the Russian ambassador to the UN! What was never said was why. He had meetings with all the ambassadors for all the members of the security council and Israel. He did it on behalf of the Israelis. (Possibly to test the waters or talk about the US recognising Jerusalem as the capital of Israel) So what was actually a scandal of Israeli interference and influence became one of supposed Russian interference and influence. But you can’t get away with that now, people are watching. And more importantly, they are trying to make sense of something that doesn’t make sense outside of the Israel lobby and the success of the Israel lobby can’t be understood without understanding diaspora Jewish power and the existence of the neocon conspiracy to fill the apparatus of US foreign policy with Zionist Jews.

They don’t control social media (At least not enough) and are thus unable to defend this morally on there (Except by trying to convince everyone it’s okay because Jews are superior to everyone else) and it can be used to incite protests. This is going to be a long summer.

What happens when they start to understand the Ukraine war and immigration?

It’s all Bari Weiss’ nightmare.

The Israelification of American police has definitely been a thing since the late 90s and particularly since 9/11 with so many going there to learn. Learn what? Who ever said Israel has the best police? Oh, right, they learn how to be paramilitary thugs.

Even the equipment the NYPD had was insane to me.

Similarly in Europe police have changed in their look over the last 30 years. Gone are the days they wore a shirt and hard-soled black shoes all the time. Now they go around looking like paramilitaries and wear military pants and boots even when they do wear a shirt. This seemed to be more apparent in continental Europe but lately it looks like Britain and Ireland are starting to imitate it.

The most interesting sight was after the attacks in Belgium where patrols of soldiers and police (Since soldiers can’t arrest people) were undertaken. Their gear for both was essentially identical just the police stuff was in blue. Granted these were police in full tactical gear. But the point remains that police are increasingly patrolling the streets wearing literal jack boots. They look like there are there to engage in violence.

None of this would be needed if either or both an end to Western support for Israels wars and ethnic cleansing or support for Jewish diaspora demands for the end of any ownership of Western countries by their people and thus inability to end or reverse immigration of ethnic aliens. If the West didn’t support these wars or import Arabs there wouldn’t be a problem. Even better, do both.

However the sheer political force (Which Bari Weiss tried to warn Zionists the Jews had lost control over) of BLM wokeness means people are asking questions about this now and this trend is ending but many of the mentalities seem to remain.

Even more insane the training isn’t just with Israel police, it’s with the IDF itself.

That four-eyed cocksucker Mike Johnson refused to explain whether or not there is any form of protest against Israel that is not “antisemitism.” He wouldn’t say with a straight face, in his interview with Erin Burnett, that it’s his belief that all opposition to Israeli policy is “antisemitism.”

And still wearing that psycho disingenuous flag pin only 23 and a half years after 9/11.

At this stage he is the perfect representative of the Republican party. Flag pins, giveaways to capital and wars for Israel. He wears an American flag pin because it’s all he can do to pretend not to be doing all he can to destroy it. The purpose of that pin was to wrap the flag and supposed American national interest around a not just Zionist but extreme Likud pill.

What every single one of these people needs to be hammered with every time they walk outside is “Do you support the US fighting a war with Iran, that Israel will start, on Israel’s behalf?”

That’s the only question now. Because there is no reason a sane person can look at the situation and conclude things are going any other way.

After witnessing the events in Gaza, why would you not think the Jews would try to hurt you?

How does that even make sense?

This is what Jews do: they hurt people. That’s the only thing they do.

I grew up with the typical multicultural education and so I just made a distinction between Jews elsewhere and Israelis, one day in the early to mid 2000s after another round of insane war crimes by the Israelis I started typing “Israeli psychology” and eventually found the site “Jewish Tribal Review”, though at first I only read the articles on Israel I saw the other articles with just endless examples of a type of Jewish ethnocentric psychology. I never liked shock-jocks or got the appeal of Howard Stern but reading comments from him about stealing fruit from a gentile as a child and not thinking anything of it were eye-opening. These mentalities were not an aberration brought on in Israel through being a settler colonial state, they were there in the diaspora already. But, of course, there were more examples from endless Jewish celebrities and others. Then you get to parts dealing with Jewish organisations. The site wasn’t inflammatory or hate-filled. It just had a very sober endless list of examples. Then you get into the “early life history” noticing in the present. (Will wikipedia turn out to be the worst thing to ever happen to the Jews?)

Nothing that happened in reality ever seemed to contradict the premise of that site and by taking it in I was able to predict the future. (The only true test of any world-view is how well it predicts the future because that is the test of how well it understands the present and the world) It was through this that I was also able to see the truth on immigration (It’s scale and how it will impact societies and nations that suffer it) and why Jews were always the biggest supporters of it.

Crucially it also made the US wars in the Middle East and the so-called neocons finally make sense for surely there is absolutely no way to make sense of them without use of the words “Israel” or “Jew”. You’d be surprised how many people don’t know about the neocons, particularly after the high of knowledge and discussion of them during the Bush admin. To understand that thread unravels the whole tapestry by itself. Which is why Adam Curtis’ documentary “The Power of Nightmares” (Which concludes that the Straussian neocons began to believe their own propaganda and sought to make Iraq a democratic paradise to explain why the Iraq war happened! He interviews several of them and goes back to Strauss, he wasn’t doing no leg work.) and Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 9/11” (Which seeks only to implicate Bush in a 9/11 scandal through his ties to the Saudis, no mention of Israel or Jews in that movie either. Iraq was all about oil and getting fat contracts for Halliburton it concludes.) were not just failures but detrimental to understanding all this.

What were they?

Was it the Jewish version of “From the River to the Sea”?

When a bunch of Israelis (Aged 15 to 22) were acquitted after a strange signed confession was presented (Which the woman said she didn’t sign willingly and says she renounces) of gang rape of an 18 year old English girl in Cyprus (They admit they all ran a train on her, including the 15 year old, which seems against the law but whatever and filming it before throwing her out of the room and laughing at her.) their friends and family greeted them at the airport by certain chants, maybe one of those.

https://web.archive.org/web/20191103210921/https://www.timesofisrael.com/some-in-israel-uneasy-with-heroes-welcome-for-teens-cleared-of-gang-rape

In the arrivals hall, the teens, all wearing white yarmulkes, loudly celebrated their release by opening champagne bottles, chanting “Am Yisrael Chai” (the people of Israel lives) along with “the Brit is a whore.”

Aaaaaand it happened again. Different English girl dragged from pool in same resort by another group of Israelis who gang raped her, currently they haven’t figured out how to get them off but apparently the DNA evidence has been thrown out on a technicality.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/dna-evidence-in-cyprus-gang-rape-trial-said-thrown-out-over-police-procedures

I queried Google about how many Israelis there were in LA (Seems like there are a lot) and it shot up 250,000 which, wow. But then I see the number comes not from official LA, Californian and US government sources but the Israeli-American Council so who knows. The wikipedia page for the same organisation says there are 125,000 Israeli-Americans which includes both naturalised Israelis and those of Israeli immigrant descent. Anyway, more than enough to get some young male IDF vets to beat up some Americans. This doesn’t even touch how many American Jews without any Israeli ties there are in LA. Young rich males are quite likely to feel entitled to hit people they regard as their social inferiors double for Jews. No doubt Ben Shapiro is all rich young American Jews use as a source of news.

But the guys in the footage don’t seem to be Shapiro’d Zoomer Jews. They seem to be Israeli immigrants to me.

It blew me away when searching for the original incident to see all the top results for a new one that is exactly the same from September 2023.

It’s pretty simple.

Israel has enormous power and the ability to smash Gaza at all times. So why is there a conflict with Hamas?

Because Israel refuses to end the military occupation and isolation of Gaza.

Why? Because Israel is holding on to the possibility of stealing Gaza too and not only that, they don’t have a desire to add the people living there to their state.

This is obvious to the students, this is obvious to any observer and it’s been obvious for decades, for generations.

Israel pretends that this is all really because it’s impossible, somehow to make an agreement with Hamas because they’re “terrorists” or something. (To paraphrase de Gaulle, the graveyards of the world are filled with heads of state who started out as freedom fighters and terrorists. Israel being the most prominent.) This is obviously false as Israel funded and enabled Hamas to displace the local PLO government in Gaza in the first place.

Meanwhile in the West Bank the PLO which started out as a terrorist organisaiton runs the West Bank with the full diplomatic cooperation of Israel as a kind of Vichy force. Meanwhile the same Israeli government just goes on planting more insane settlers and setting up buffer zones to “protect” them from the Palestinian natives. As an aside anti-white comedienne Sarah Silverman’s sister is one of them. Slowly and slowly the noose is tied around these now isolated communities, like a broken ecology of a forest being felled.

Granted these details aren’t necessarily known by people but they understand perfectly well that the Israelis control the situation and are insane. Apparently not even Obama knew about this or so he said. I actually wouldn’t be surprised. It’s been so long that there must actually be people who believe the “two state solution” and “peace process” are things Israel has any desire to engage in. But the continuing lie that there is some “process” just gives Israel cover and time to make it’s “facts on the ground”.

https://mondoweiss.net/2018/07/improbable-settlements-supposedly

There is no peace because Israel doesn’t want peace. Israel wants war because war allows them to continue to steal land and ethnically cleanse people. That has been the game since 1948. And not just the formal borders of Palestine as set by the British but they also covet large parts of Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. And now probably Egypt due to the brief period where Israel occupied the Sinai.

For the same reason Israel wants war because it allows them the chance to induce a conflict with Lebanon to occupy the South with Syria and Iran so the US will fight and shatter them for it.

Perchance some Jew commits a great evil and goes to jail, he gets special treatment and is likely to be pardoned sooner than later because powerful Jews look out for one another as fellow tribesmen. Jews believe that even a bad Jew’s liberty is more precious than the lives of countless goyim.

A few years ago an English girl accused an Israeli of luring her to his room (Most North West European countries have a disgust for Israelis but she was English so off to Tinder gang rape she went) while both were vacationing in Cyprus and then his friends jumped out to gang rape her. I don’t understand gang rape, it certainly doesn’t sound like a lot of fun to have sex with the same girl with my friends let alone raping her. It seems to be a very uncommon thing among North West Europeans. It seems an act of pure sadism and very primitive tribal clannishness. Like something chimpanzees would do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Cyprus_rape_allegation_case

Eventually after a very strange trial and very strange behavior by the Cypriot authorities (So strange that the subsequent conviction of the girl for a false rape claim was overturned by the Cypriot Supreme Court 3 years later when it was safe to do so and the rape was old news with the media having trumpeted the supposed innocence of the men.) the men were declared innocent and the girl charged with making a false rape allegation.

The evidence was so damning given the many injuries on the girl, the unusual number of used condoms and condom wrappers littering the room and the fact that they even admitted to having group sex with her in the room (They had taken video with their phones) just they said it was consensual. So consensual she immediately went out and in a distressed state accused them of gang rape. There is also a suggestion that her signed confession doesn’t seem to have been written by a native English speaker.

This was the scene at Tel Aviv airport when they arrived with the charges dropped. Even the Israeli media were uncomfortable with the scene which lived up to many ugly Jewish and particularly ugly Israel stereotypes. They were all wearing bright white kippas. Many of them were apparently chanting “The Brit is a whore!” in Hebrew and English. Imagine having a public celebration completely with champagne that your boys were cleared of gang rape at an airport. They only, according to the Cypriot police, ran a train on a girl and filmed it before kicking her out of the room and laughing at her. What parent doesn’t share a glass of bubbly with their son in public after that? Either way it gives a deep sense of Jewishness being like a gang, innocence or guilt don’t matter when it involves an outgroup.

https://web.archive.org/web/20191103210921/https://www.timesofisrael.com/some-in-israel-uneasy-with-heroes-welcome-for-teens-cleared-of-gang-rape

Incredibly while looking up the video and news report of this incident, there has been recently another in late September of 2023 in the same resort town of Ayia Napa in Cyprus. This time it was even more brazen with one Israeli guy simply dragging another English girl to his room (He didn’t even lure her this time, straight rape from the beginning) before his friends ambushed her. The Jews are amazing. In their twisted minds were they engaged in “revenge” for the acquitted (But almost certainly guilty) Israelis from last time? Or did their insane acquittal embolden them? Either way it looks like the authorities are forced to deal with this seriously this time. Though recently the DNA evidence was thrown out for a technicality.

Look at this report from the Times of Israel, even they are having to admit to this being very cut and dry. But the throwing out of the DNA evidence augers for another case of “Israeli justice”.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240322001527/https://www.timesofisrael.com/dna-evidence-in-cyprus-gang-rape-trial-said-thrown-out-over-police-procedures

The woman told police that on September 3, she struck up a conversation with one of the suspects by the pool at the Federania Gardens hotel in Ayia Napa. The man then pulled her by the arm to the room, and when inside, tried to remove her swimsuit, she claimed.

According to Walla, the woman said she resisted, but two more men appeared and the three suspects then raped her. The woman said she heard other people entering and leaving the room during the alleged assault, but was not sure how many there were in total.

The woman said she eventually managed to escape to the room’s bathroom, where she locked the door, got dressed and began screaming for help. The suspects told her to keep quiet but she emerged from the bathroom and fled the room, found her friends and told them what happened. They then called the police.

Officers who were called to the scene found the woman in a “distressed state,” but she was still able to direct them to the room in the hotel, the report said.

Investigators removed evidence from the room, including sheets, and examined both the woman and the suspects. DNA samples were also taken from both the woman and her alleged assailants. Leaked reports of the investigation said blood was found in the room and the woman had bruises and abrasions on her arms.

In a similar case in 2019, which made international headlines, a woman alleged that she was raped by up to 12 Israeli tourists, aged 15 to 22, in a hotel room in the seaside holiday resort of Ayia Napa. She was 18 at the time.

The Israeli teenagers and young men denied any wrongdoing and were eventually released from custody and allowed to return home. More recently, calls have grown for that case to be reopened.

More links on the most recent case.

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20230904-five-israelis-held-in-cyprus-over-alleged-gang-rape

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/04/men-detained-cyprus-accusation-gang-rape-british-woman-holiday

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/09/04/british-tourist-gang-raped-israelis-ayia-napa-cyprus/

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/23800970/horror-moment-brit-dragged-ayia-napa-hotel-raped/

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-09-04/ty-article/.premium/six-israelis-arrested-in-cyprus-on-suspicion-of-raping-u-k-tourist/0000018a-5f98-daa9-a78f-ffbffe0f0000

https://www.timesofisrael.com/dna-evidence-in-cyprus-gang-rape-trial-said-thrown-out-over-police-procedures

Jews, who once used to take pride as champions of civil liberties, now use media monopoly, platform monopoly, financial service monopoly, and all kinds of lawyer tricks to shut down speech and discussion that goes against Jewish power and its favored Narratives. At this point, the ACLU might as well be a wing of AIPAC.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/the-disintegration-of-the-aclu-james-kirchick

Tablet, the Jewish periodical had the former ACLU head, Ira Glasser there to ponder why the ACLU had gone from being pro-free speech in the abstract to becoming a blatantly partisan gatekeeper and sometimes promoter of censorship. Neither dare say it, perhaps neither really were able to accept it. But veteran noticers might have worked it out.

Glasser and his friends rarely encountered anybody who wasn’t Jewish, much less Black, within the 12-block neighborhood of East Flatbush that comprised the world of their childhood (New York City, he says in the film, was less the fabled “melting pot” of popular American sentiment than “a collection of insular segregated tribes”).

…

No American minority had reaped more from its faith in the country’s professed commitment to pluralism and tolerance than the Jews, a gift they repaid many times over by supporting the institutions—the universities, the Democratic Party, the ACLU—which upheld them. In the same way Lenny Bruce classified Ray Charles and fruit salad as Jewish (while claiming that “Evaporated milk is goyish even if the Jews invented it”), so the ACLU was seen as scrappy, authentic, and emblematic of an underdog quality. As Bruce might have put it: the ACLU, Jewish; the McCarthyite American Jewish League Against Communism, goyish.

…

In 2018, the ACLU spent over$1 million on advertisements likening Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh to Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein, essentially accusing him of crimes for which he was never tried or convicted. More egregious than their brazen political partisanship was the way in which the ads traduced the presumption of innocence, a bedrock of American jurisprudence and a principle the ACLU was founded to uphold. Asked why his organization was willing to further violate its tradition of political neutrality, Faiz Shakir, a Democratic Party operative then serving as the ACLU’s national political director, was brutally honest. “People have funded us and I think they expect a return,” he said. Glasser also points to the group’s decision to run a television advertisement supporting then-Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams as a telling sign of its transformation. “I mean, I love Stacey Abrams,” Glasser told me. “She has become my favorite political character in the country. But the ACLU has always stayed away from that. Nobody attacked Richard Nixon or Ronald Reagan on their civil liberties violations more vigorously and strenuously than I did. But we always stayed away from political partisanship, and it was critical for the ACLU, virtually for all its history, to have standards that were as applicable to those most of us politically supported as to those who most of us politically opposed.”

But it is the group’s attitude toward the First Amendment, the ACLU’s bread and butter, that has been most concerning. In 2004, The New York Times revealed that Romero had consented to sign a grant agreement from his former employers at the Ford Foundation, included at the behest of pro-Israel activists, stipulating that any recipient of the foundation’s largesse “agree that your organization will not promote or engage in violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state,” a vaguely worded contravention of free speech principles. Not only did Romero initially refrain from informing the board about the controversial agreement, but he also neglected to mention that he had helped draft it, allegedly recommending the Patriot Act as a model. That same year, the national ACLU was silent about a case involving a San Diego high school student punished for wearing a T-shirt condemning homosexuality, in contrast to the many students it had defended who donned clothing emblazoned with pro-gay messages (or in the case of one Alaska stoner it proudly represented, the message “Bong Hits 4 Jesus”).

…

Not that they ever pulled punches. Debating the constitutionality of flag burning on Firing Line, Buckley told Glasser something to the effect that the “average American” has a visceral reaction to the desecration of the Stars and Stripes

…

Were the ACLU today confronted with a lawsuit similar to National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie, Glasser doubts the group would take it. (Tellingly, in an essay collection celebrating its most important cases published on the occasion of the group’s 100th anniversary last year, the ACLU neglected to include that seminal litigation).

If one wants to be really cynical neither of these two Jewish men is engaged in self-deception, they’re scared that the ideals and the largely non-Jewish activist network led by people like them might turn out to be bad for the Jews in the end afterall. It was all fun and games while they could control the MSM media and stop these standards and morals from applying to Israel but the politicisation of social media since 2014 (Also the last time it was warcimes o’clock for Israel) has created an environment Israel can’t survive.

The power users of the internet (This shift has happened so fast and so seamlessly with the advent of smart phones that we forget the old memes of “There are no girls on the internet”, well now it’s mostly young women who are addicted to it, social media is to young women what online multiplayer video games are to young men. We could even say the whole “GamerGate” thing was a conflict between the old powerusers, young men with high functioning autism and young women with BPD, natural enemies.), the core around which “current thing” organises are young women, particularly young women with BPD and associated cluster B traits.

Once they go nuclear on something it trends and we are all forced to deal with it. We’re already seeing this whole situation cause many of them, particularly on places like TikTok question things. Once they get behind something it becomes impossible to ignore. And more importantly they become deranged unthinking extremists about it! Bari Weiss resigned from the NYT (A very nice cusy job but dolts have come to her rescue paying her money for a subscription to her irrelevant thoughts) to warn against this. The last major Israeli warcrime fest was in 2014 just as the “Great Awokening” and the politicisation of American social media was beginning. She feared what would happen with social media in a post-Floyd era. How would they defend Israel on uncontrolled social media? What would they do when #DefundTheIDF trended?

Well, we’re there now and it’s Bari Weiss’ nightmare, no matter how much kowtowing Elon does to Israel. A giant global conversation that is radicalising young women (Previously the most apolitical group in society) into a fit of virtue-signalling and protesting.

https://ifunny.co/video/the-global-noticing-intensifies-meanwhile-at-adl-headquarters-lwlOSYEOB?s=cl

Matt Lee, the very able diplomatic correspondent at The Associated Press, got it righter than anyone in his April 22 report: The point of Blinken’s three days of talks with top Chinese officials

It goes beyond that, the point was to have them and then to fail. In fact this has been Blinken’s whole diplomatic career. His job as the reasonable looking neocon (He doesn’t look like a bloodthirsty psycho like Rumsfeld, Nuland or Kagan, so much so he doesn’t really look or register as a fierce neocon at all) is to pretend to attempt a diplomatic approach but then deliberately fail to reach an agreement, paving the way for economic and real warfare.

Long before the current Israeli war I read but can’t find the article where somebody called Blinken a “fake diplomat” for this reason. His job is to make the diplomacy fail to open the door to war and economic sanctions so that war doesn’t look like Plan A.

Similarly Blinken just keeps failing to stop Israel but the image of him being “deebly goncerned” and going to Jordan and Egypt in addition to Israel helps dissipate pressure on the US, Egypt and Jordanian governments to act.

His job then is to make it look like the US is engaged in diplomacy and can be negotiated with but just present unacceptable necon terms with the hope that diplomacy fails.

At heart Blinken is a hardcore Zionist. Here he is while Obama’s ambassador to the UN pledging to stand with Israel even if they are alone in the world in doing so.

https://twitter.com/WalkerBragman/status/1331159077397929985

At around the same time he also appeared with Grover to teach children why it was imperative that Europe let in all the refugees from the Middle East the US created (Including many who weren’t from the Middle East or refugees at all) that it is all too tempting to see as another neocon act of aggression against their enemies in the West, the peoples of Europe. No word on Palestinian refugees or their right of return though. Why is Tony Blinken able to swan around in Israel but not those displaced from there?

Grover knew not to bring up the longest lasting UN refugee camps and populations in history, he didn’t want to be blacklisted in Hollywood.

And the US needs to dominate both Russia and China in order to continue to be able to do that. Of course, they might not need to fight both Russia and China if they had made peace with Russia and got them to help counterbalance China but once you start things with Russia in 2022 that also means you are fighting a Sino-Russian alliance, that is unavoidable. The reason they started things with Russia was because of the Russian counter-intervention that stopped Syria turning into another Iraq with a coalition invasion and occupation.

How to square that circle, that starting a war with Russia would mean you enter a cold war with a Sino-Russian alliance you can’t ever hope to prevail over, I don’t know. In my view the history of Zionism is a history of whack-a-mole creating new enemies to fight the old enemies. Hamas is a great example having been formed to fight the PLO. Though Hamas has proven more capable of an opposition than the PLO given their religious fanaticism they are also a great foil to use in terms of pretending why you can’t engage in peace negotiations. You can’t, you just keep acting with unlimited aggression until you hit the wall of reality. Though it seems like they won’t accept it.

This mentality was summed up by Jeffrey Goldberg when as editor of the Atlantic (A position he held for no other reason it seems than because he left his native Brooklyn to join the IDF and spent many years as a prison guard for detained Palestinians) when he demanded Obama come forth and explain why he wasn’t going all the way in Ukraine.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525

Obama’s theory here is simple: Ukraine is a core Russian interest but not an American one, so Russia will always be able to maintain escalatory dominance there.

“The fact is that Ukraine, which is a non-nato country, is going to be vulnerable to military domination by Russia no matter what we do,” he said.

I asked Obama whether his position on Ukraine was realistic or fatalistic.

“It’s realistic,” he said. “But this is an example of where we have to be very clear about what our core interests are and what we are willing to go to war for. And at the end of the day, there’s always going to be some ambiguity.” He then offered up a critique he had heard directed against him, in order to knock it down. “I think that the best argument you can make on the side of those who are critics of my foreign policy is that the president doesn’t exploit ambiguity enough. He doesn’t maybe react in ways that might cause people to think, Wow, this guy might be a little crazy.”

“The ‘crazy Nixon’ approach,” I said: Confuse and frighten your enemies by making them think you’re capable of committing irrational acts.

“But let’s examine the Nixon theory,” he said. “So we dropped more ordnance on Cambodia and Laos than on Europe in World War II, and yet, ultimately, Nixon withdrew, Kissinger went to Paris, and all we left behind was chaos, slaughter, and authoritarian governments that finally, over time, have emerged from that hell. When I go to visit those countries, I’m going to be trying to figure out how we can, today, help them remove bombs that are still blowing off the legs of little kids. In what way did that strategy promote our interests?”

Here Goldberg expresses the accepted neocon cant, first expressed perhaps by Moshe Dayan a philosophy of unending deranged aggression designed to make your opponent give up before he should by giving a false impression of what you’d be willing to fight over up to and including things that are irrational and not in your interests. The trouble with this idea is that it assumes nobody ever calls your bluff or if, that they can do much to you.

It reminds me of a quote form the Godfather novel that didn’t make it to the movie.

“There are men in this world,” he said, “who go about demanding to be killed. You must have noticed them. They quarrel in gambling games, they jump out of their automobiles in a rage if someone so much as scratches their fender, they humiliate and bully people whose capabilities they do not know. I have seen a man, a fool, deliberately infuriate a group of dangerous men, and he himself without any resources. These are people who wander through the world shouting, ‘Kill me. Kill me.’ And there is always somebody ready to oblige them.”

Well the Russians called their bluff in Ukraine and have no just won the war on the ground but economically and diplomatically too. Starting the war on Ukraine was like Pearl Harbor, the Japanese failed to hit the carriers but carried out a startling act of aggression that woke up the American industrial machine. Similarly any plan to quickly knock out the Russians or isolate them from their allies has instead failed and rather woken up the Chinese giant to how far the US will go.

Now the US finds itself in a situation where they in the early stages of setting up a new cold war against a Sino-Russian alliance it can’t hope to ever overcome.

What’s chilling is that to the neocons they are faced with their golem fading from power. Now these people don’t accept defeat. So the question is, will they be tempted to start a war now when the disposition of forces is most advantageous to the US (Similar to how the Germans in 1913 hoped to find a causus belli against Russia sooner rather than later given that the Russians were beginning to industrialize and every day the relative strength of Russia to Germany would grow) in a now or never play to reset the global order back again to US ascendancy?

We’ve had the current British Minister of Defense talk about how we’re in a 1937 world already…

I remember watching taskmaster when he was on it and him relating in a way that was clearly not meant to be a joke but serious about how as a child he used to hide scared of Hitler. (Baddiel was of course born after WW2) And I tend to believe him.

How much does an unexamined delusion paranoia feed into all this.

I was also struck how Baddiel, years after ceasing to be a celebrity in Britain got a coveted spot on the Late Show with Seth Meyers to promote his book “Jews Don’t Count” (About how, in his deranged opinion, antisemitism isn’t treated as a form of racism. To the degree that this is even true it’s because it’s been staked out as being a special kind of ethnic hatred that is seen as the most evil and higher than mere racism) despite not ever being famous in the US. Which means his insane book was the draw for him to be on the show and that either Meyers or his producers agree with the premise of the book. It’s a fairly insane premise that Jews in the West don’t have their ethnic complaints taken seriously despite it being the opposite.

In general the book tries to get what he wants, Jews returned to primacy of ethnic politics in moral terms in the Anglopshere by lying about it. Bari Weiss’ resignation from the NYT is also clearly a reflection on this. She was treated with kid gloves by the liberal media and not opposed at all as she gave her little soapbox speech about “wokeness” despite being a Gen X lesbian once married to Kate McKinnon. Of course the only political opinion she ever held dear was Zionism. She was obviously warning Zionists that the forces they unleashed and help to create to undermine the ethnic majorities of Western countries had inadvertently given too much moral superiority to non-whites and that social media was beyond control unlike traditional media. What would they do if #DefundTheIDF trended? How would they defend Israel the next time?

Well the next time is here and we’re seeing social media enable massive political reactions and protests. Bari Weiss’ nightmare.

It hasn’t quite become a kind of histrionic meltdown because the MSM hasn’t done it’s part to amplify and reflect in a kind of runaway oscillation like before though. (Like the whole derangement about Russia which saw millions of 15 year old girls become neocons on Russia and think the US state department was going to help Ukraine. The end result has been even more catastrophic for Ukraine than even I would have thought merely through dragging it out for so long. And even worse, what will Western “reconstruction” look like?) But once it bleeds into the real world the media have to cover it. You have to cover universities shutting down classes, banning graduation speeches etc. And while I think everyone here has a healthy disgust with mainstream journos, they aren’t so much evil on Israel as cowards and you can’t keep them down all the time, there will be times dissent bleeds through on MSM.

They’ve done a stellar job keeping NBA players quiet though. Though who knows how long that lid can be kept shut before awkward questions about the ethnic composition of owners and players comes to a head again.

Galloway looks exactly like a guy I used to work with. Galloway is probably tall, domineering and generally good at bullying people and has had professional success this way. When he says “incel” what he really means is “this person is my social inferior and therefore their opinions when they conflict with mine should be taken as inferior also”. A lot of the world can be better understood when you realise just how many people think like this.

Neither he nor the guy I worked with were able to really engage with anything complex (He had Putin Derangement Syndrome and I couldn’t understand in 2019 what exactly made him hate Putin other than the media told him to. Like the others they assumed Western dissidents liked Putin because he was some kind of proto-Fascist rather than the only counter force stopping more insane wars for Israel.) politically since they broke the world down into sides and good and bad. Of course my former coworker wasn’t Jewish so he didn’t have to deal with trying to defend his team when it came to them announcing that they had the right to ethnically cleanse and destroy other peoples and they had the right to do it no matter the cost to the whole world.

In a perfect illustration of the David Baddiel attitudes of Falter, he was actually elected “Anti-Racism Officer” whilst an undergrad at Warwick university in the early 2000s. He was also on the Race and Religion Incident Review Panel of Warwickshire Police and West Midlands Police’s Key Individuals Network.

During his post-grad he made news when he accused Rowan Laxton of saying “F*ing Israelis! F*ing Jews!” (Laxton says he only said the first part not he second) in 2009 when both were in the London Business School gym. Falter then called police and alledgedly only decided to file a report after he learned Laxton was a senior diplomat, then head of the South Asian desk at the foreign office.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/sep/24/senior-diplomat-racial-harassment-case

In a Mavi Marmara like move, he also added ridiculous statements he alleged Laxton said (Presumably after he learned he was a diplomat given the use of the term “international community”) that sound more like what a psychopathic Hasbara agent with limited human empathy would imagine would sound like a convincing statement from somebody.

“If I had my way, the fucking international community should be sent in, and if the Israelis got in the way, they’d be blown off the fucking earth.”

Remarkably Laxton sought an appeal of the charges and got the charges he said the latter, unconvincing statement and also got the charge of him saying “F*ing Jews!” thrown out too.

The whole ordeal cost Laxton his marriage and probably got him heavily demoted within the Foreign Office. So basically this guy previously engaged in false statements to the police and perjury against a senior Foreign Office employee for saying “F*ing Israelis!” to himself when he thought nobody else could hear in response to a news report about a poor old farmer being killed on his farm by the Israeli military in Gaza.

Sadly but not shockingly the only news reports I could find on his successful appeal (As opposed to his ridiculous show trial) on the internet is one report in the Jewish Chronicle and one not even article but brief mention in the Spectator where they mention the slander (And even go further calling it “ranting about Israelis” rather than a single under-the-breath comment) and his not being fired from the Foreign Office and in parenthesis his acquittal on appeal as if he had just badgered the courts and got off on a technicality.

The appeal was important because Falter got Laxton charged on the very serious crime of racial hate speech due to the idea that he has in essence knowingly said all the things (Including the clearly false ones) with the intention of insulting Jewish people. The appeals court rationally found that the statements attributed to Laxton other than “F*ing Israelis” were almost certainly made up and that it was idiotic for somebody to claim being racial abused by somebody saying something in what was essentially a private space and empty room with Falter being on the floor below.

https://www.thejc.com/news/foreign-office-man-wins-appeal-against-race-abuse-claim-gyp2ql35

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-spectator-s-notes-1-may-2010

I’m still waiting for the other shoe to drop and these people to realise the war in Ukraine was provoked by the US state department (Read: Department of Zionism) in order to occupy the Russians to kick things off in the Middle East and in a deranged rage to seek “revenge” on Russia for thwarting the planned war in Syria.

The reason they won’t tolerate a functioning Russia is the threat it poses to US hyperpower status and with it the ability of the US to start wars of aggression for Israel.

As I’ve often said, what goes unsaid tends to become inconceivable

Nah, they just put ladies on the bench. Choosing social conventions/coercion over objective reality causes zero cognitive dissonance for women. They’re very useful to powerful men in that way.

It is the year 2371 and the last WASP continues the vile thoughts of his kind.

Irish Travellers, Swedish Travellers and Scottish Travellers “Showmen”, often held the erroneous belief that they were somehow descended from Gypsies (The romanticism of them in the 19th century from a lack of actual contact made making such an associating potentially status-increasing, remember Heathcliff from Wuthering Heights was a romantic exotic Gypsy) who were also assumed to be from the seemingly more reasonable Egyptian extraction (Hence “Gypsy” and yet more status-increasing in the heady early days of Egyptology) rather than the more incredible Indian ancestry. (Though not necessary more incredible if you had the occasion as so very very few did to have actually met and seen an Arab, an Indian and a Gypsy from the Balkans/Hungary.)

In reality it was more a kind of convergent evolution. It seems likely that over time this has occurred many times. A whole community of people are, for one reason or another, inclined to leave a particular area and move to another. Often this movement is not very far and the group is small or of little visual ethnic different to those they settle around. But if they aren’t or if they keep up their itinerant ways it’s more conspicuous. It also has significant implications. As high degrees of clannishness, cousin-marriage and a kind of attitude of them and us towards the whole world and
“settled” people evolved in each. With an attitude that it’s their right to cheat and steal from the guileless less cohesive “settled” people.

The Gypsies even came up with theological arguments after they became Christians, telling the story that the man who made the nails for Christ’s crucifixion was a Gypsy (Easier to believe when there was a widespread misunderstanding that they came from Egypt) only handed over 3 instead of 4, with the 4th intended to be used to pierce Jesus’ heart. In return for this, God supposedly gave the Gypsies the devine right to steal from non-Gypsies! If all this particularly with the current events in the world makes you think about another itinerant clannish group who engaged in much consanguinity, I don’t know whom you may be referring to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_crucifixion_legend

I suspect the particular kind of caravan mode of living is induced by people fleeing the apparatus of state itself, like taxation or conscription. In Bangladesh there are a tribal people who are ethnic Burman, they live up in the hills and when British anthropologists first found them they assumed their stories of only being in the hills a few hundred years, that they once lived in a valley and had writing but fled to escape a cruel ruler who sought to impress their sons into a war was pure nonsense. Nobody would willingly give up civilisation, therefore they must be a relict population of the original hunter-gatherers who inhabited the whole area. Well modern genetics now tells us this is false, that the Dravidians were there first and the people we know as “East Asians” evolved later. Their language is a Burman one and their story was true. In essence they were Gypsies/Travellers who settled, only being conspicuous by their racial difference to the people around them and their lifestyle living in comparatively primitive existence. I wonder if this often happened but just wasn’t recorded much.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribal_people_in_Chittagong_Hill_Tracts

But Steve is right, these populations systematically essentially stopped having interaction with the source one even though they continued to live amongst it becoming a separate ethnicity. Both they and the original population saw each other as different groups. I don’t know if it’s true but I think the Swedish and Norwegian Travellers claim descent from Scottish Travellers.

As a matter of fact, the whole British government is in the Jewish pocket.

Not just the Tories. And it seems to actually more severe with the current leader of the Labour party being selected, after the insane media/political coup against Corbyn (Which shared a lot of similarities with the media/political coup against Trump) purely on the basis of his support for Israel and affiliated neocon positions. Per Wikipedia.

He also criticised the Stop the War Coalition in an opinion piece for The Guardian arguing that they were “not benign voices for peace” but rather “[a]t best they are naive, at worst they actively give succour to authoritarian leaders” such as Vladimir Putin “who directly threaten democracies.”

In any case eventually after almost 6 months of Israel destruction and slaughter eventually a vote was held in the UK parliament on the house’s position on a ceasefire. This was forced by the Scottish National Party who put forth the most clear-cut proposal. Both Labour and the Tories also tabled their own versions, both near identical and both deliberately worded as to be meaningless and not true demands for a ceasefire at all.

Because it was one of the rare days where the SNP were treated as the official opposition party (The UK system is designed to assume a duopoly with much smaller other parties than the SNP) they chose this day since it meant their proposal would be granted the right to be voted on along with a government motion.

This would have been very uncomfortable for the Labour party since a significant number of their MPs would vote for the SNP motion (And if they didn’t, they would have to vote for the Tory one) and put Starmer in a bad place having to defend his position.

So Starmer paid a strange private visit to the Speaker of the House (A former Labour MP named Lindsay Hoyle) and when it came time for a vote the Speaker strangely treated the Labour proposal with higher priority than the SNP one and essentially left members with only the near identical fake ceasefire proposals from Labour and the Tories to vote on. This caused a huge furor for all kinds of reasons with the Speaker essentially throwing out established procedure for the obvious reason of aiding his former party and showing bias to it. I can’t overstate how serious this incident was and how angry the MPs were. The Speaker ran and hid in his office and had a junior person do his job for him. There was even talk of cutting the feed when he did reappear to answer for himself in parliament.

If you’re wondering, here is Lindsay Hoyle (White hair, second from the right) in Israel being shown around by Israeli government minders around the settlements that saw most of the action on October 7th. (Being mostly lit up by the IDF we now know) That’s normal right? Totally normal for the Speaker of the House of Commons to fly off to Israel have a North Korean style chaperoned trip around it to show solidarity with it’s insane campaign of bombing civilians in one of the most tightly populated regions on Earth and make a video that is published by the official press and PR office of the Israeli government about how “you can still smell the death here”. The previous Speaker, John Bercow (Berkowitz) was a particularly odious Jew who was apparently despised by everyone and who would cry “antisemitism” at any criticism. He reigned for a good 10 years, the longest term in 50 years and generally one of the longest in the modern era. Bercow is famous for defecting to Labour after Brexit despite having some of the most right-wing economic views in parliament. A move that obviously only a Jew concerned by immigration would do. Though Hoyle has a somewhat Jewish-looking face there is no evidence he is even partly Jewish.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-parliament-descends-into-chaos-over-gaza-ceasefire-vote-2024-02-21

Despite lots of talk of his position being untenable and him looking visible scared and shaken by the fact that he had crossed an unacceptable line two months on he is still there.

What’s astounding is that even with the huge controversy and shouting in parliament this obvious and naked demonstration of Jewish power and the Zionist lobby was just ignored. It was chalked up to “playing politics”.

I wonder if the professional class white women who read the NYT were as interested in geopolitics as Beyonce’s hair we’d be in such a shitshow right now?

Better, I wonder if the opinions of said people were able to be expressed through social media we would have to care either way.

Bari Weiss resigning was a kite to warn other Zionists about this. Weirdly even Steve Sailer didn’t pick up on the fact that the only political opinion Weiss seems to hold dear is her rabid Zionism. The MSM strangely politely gave her a platform and refrained from any salvos of opinions against her in a 15 minutes of hate they’d give against any other prominent “liberal” who rashly resigned to protest “wokeness” in the abstract. It was all very strange unless you understood the context. “Fellow Jews, how are we going to wrap up wokeness before it comes for Israel? We need to do something!”

The goys were supposed to infer she was a typical Gen X lesbian annoyed with Gen Y/Z straight women who didn’t hate trans “women” for being men. (“Centrists”, read: Ethnocentric Jews, are there any “radical centrists” who aren’t Zionists? Seem to push “freedom of speech” issues as being about transgenderism and push the debate into that cul-de-sac. J.K. Rowling is a good example, I can’t find any Jewishness in her but she is very pro-Israel.) But actually it was about the “unsolicited opinions about Israel” she inferred from the incoming younger staff. She felt it, she saw the inflection point coming and the loss of ability to control it. How do you defend Israel on social media? How do you take the moral high ground in current year? How can they stop the beast they created?

Afterall, all the isms and evil that the rabid hardcore of powerusers on social media were wrongly taught to believe about North West Euro societies are not just true of Israel, they’re true in an almost cartoonish way. Cherry on top the silencing of any dissent on the issue builds anger and activism and most importantly, lots and lots of discussion online like magma building under the surface. Not only is Israel the greatest evil in the world right now, you’ve created a single social and political conversation that has no choice but to see it that way.

So far it hasn’t led to a true political response (Easy to do in two party system America) because the media in the Anglosphere hasn’t been game to help it along. One of the things that seemed to cause the insane hysteria around Putin and the Ukraine war was the traditional media/social media feedback loop. We saw it too in May 2020 through to November with George Floyd. Social media goes intense, traditional media covers it and validates it, this in turn causes social media to feel like it has social permission to go even more extreme which the media picks up on and on and on we go. This creates an irresistible force in the political sphere.

But without one or the other it doesn’t work. If the media doesn’t have social media support then it’s empty propaganda. (Imagine if 15 year old girls with septum piercings hadn’t been primed with TDS and believed “Russiagate” bullshit. Would the path to war in Ukraine have been so greased?) If social media doesn’t have MSM media support then it’s just people on the internet impotently “howling across the universe”. There were lots of marches for Palestine during the Portland antifa occupation. Did you see any on TV? Me neither. But when they are in sync they create a hysterical runaway virtual harmonic vortex. Each pushing the other to become more extreme in a cycle.

Celebrities too haven’t begun to mass break ranks yet. Imagine if NBA players start to express how they feel? Right now lone guys will be hammered down but what if LeBron speaks up? And what if he gets all the other guys to come with him? Saw a YouTube ad for unicef with Ben Stiller at the height of the Israel mass murder and thought, oh wow, looks like the Irish half of him is coming through… it was for Ukraine. Of course there is a need for unicef in Ukraine too but only because Jews like Stiller won’t allow peace and so gleefully howled for war. Would it have killed him to make a video for Gaza too?

Some other cities like Memphis would be officially declining in population except that state laws in the South often allow inner cities to imperialize their suburbs and involuntarily annex them.

This also brings up the reverse, cities that are described as having depopulated to a much greater extent than they truly have because people moved out to suburbs that are spuriously incorporated as separate cities.

It would be actually interesting to look up the true fates of these towns and cities, some really have just lost the whole population to other places, others it’s a mixture, in some cases it’s just the historic core has become a black ghetto with the whites mostly really staying but filling out suburbs built to accommodate them but which in truth are part of the same city just legally not counted in the stats due to being de jure a different city even though de facto it’s the same urban area.

And to quote the theme of the Economist, this is a truly uniquely American phenomena. (At least in scale, the City of London, which is in the core but legally apart from what we actually call London has been legally distinct for hundreds of years) But as Steve has often noted, there is only so much room for white flight really, eventually it becomes unaffordable for a critical mass of whites and the suburban sprawl itself gets ridiculous, imposing itself all kinds of costs, both social and economic.

How does this fit into the plan?

Gotta escalate somewhere. But ultimately this is their last chance to ethnically cleanse both Gaza and the West Bank. Neither Iran nor Syria nor Hezbollah can tolerate certain atrocities against the Palestinians, eventually the Israelis will be able to provoke them through that to get their war between Syria Iran and the US and if not, well, it turns out they can allowed to ethnically cleanse those places for free. This war is a great cover for settlement expansion. In truth this war/massacre has revealed that there never was any serious American intent or will to stop settlement expansion.

They need constant war and hatred to forestall any negotiations for peace, that is an appalling vista to them. Remember, while most of “Israel” has little connection to any historic “Judean” kingdom, the West Bank actually was where one of these was and thus ironically the last place the Palestinians held on to was the place the crazies and religious nuts actually covet as much as Jerusalem. That the highly European admixed ashkenazi crazies whose ancestors left the Levant hundreds of years ago are less descended from those Levantine people than the Palestinians who are likely their descendants who never left and converted to Christianity and then to Islam is something they’d never appreciate. It also ignores that Jews were never the only people living in the Levant. (And by their own history came there from elsewhere and genocided a whole bunch of people)

Peace can only mean the removal of all or the bulk of the crazy settlers (Incidentally highly anti-gentile celebrity Jew Sarah Silverman’s sister is one of the crazy settlers.) and the ceding of the West Bank to any Palestinian state or, as is becoming more likely given the efforts to make “facts on the ground” hard for a two state solution, peace can only come from a one state solution which I feel most of the people running Israel would rather die than see. This is why it’s always been so dangerous, peace is literally the end of the world as far as these people are concerned. What will they risk to avoid it occurring? Let alone what will they risk on others behalf?

There is only one way this ends, in Israel being defeated. South Africa had nukes too but eventually the sanctions and political pariah status took it down. But it took decades and a demographic situation that is very unlike that of Israel and there was no global Afrikaner diaspora with huge influence in the media and politics in the most powerful Western countries.

Until a prime British TV show produces “I’ve never met a nice Israeli” I don’t know we’re at the point of their defeat coming without a war.

But why is this so? What is this demonic force that drives some human animals to oppress others?

There is a constant drum-beat in the arts that this is all just “human nature”. But in truth some peoples, like some individuals think they are superior to others and like to hurt outgroups for it’s own sake. In essence the collective personality of certain nations and peoples is simply psychopathic.

Both the English in the 18th and 19th century and the Jews have as you alluded, a concept of themselves as special chosen people from others they can take as they wish.

This is generally an unusual thing. Off the top of my head, only the Germans, Japanese and Chinese have really ingrained ideas of their people being special and superior to others in a deep innate way. And the Germans have spent decades now going the other direction, sometimes in extreme ways so cross them off the list. Though both Turkey and Azerbaijan have a similar mentality to Israel in that both see the land occupied by their historic victims of ethnic cleansing as theirs and their national destiny being to “finish the job” with respect to Greeks and Armenians respectively.

These peoples naturally produce right wing nationalism that is supremacist, it is borne out of deep emotions of contempt and needs to find it’s satisfaction in abusing outgroups. In most left wing nationalism it is based on deep affection for ones group and is inward-looking and pro-social. Right wing nationalism is often an echo of the same contempt for social inferiors and love of inequality when no outgroup is around. It can only be pro-social when addressing invasive ingroups, it becomes hostile once there is none around.

TL;DR

Some people have sociopathic collective psychologies and personalities. This is linked to cluster B personality disorders which are deeply heritable and based strongly on an instinct of contempt for social inferiors and others in general.

Though it is politically incorrect to address it, Jews have endured as alien minorities by being highly ethnocentric and have displaced staggering ethnocentricity and contempt for outgroups. Israel as a settler-colonialist state made by Jews is doubly evil and given the total lack of consequences for it’s treatment of the Palestinians (Due to the strong ethnocentrism of their diaspora in places like the US, UK and France) this is where it is. When Netanyahu is inevitably made the scape-goat for all this, everyone will pretend he was some idiosyncratic aberration who led the country astray instead of a man who embodied it (Though not as perfectly as Sharon who was even more savage and evil) and, indeed, even his staunch opponents both politicians and ordinary citizens have cheer his attempts at ethnic cleansing of Gaza and provoking a regional war that the US will fight for them.

There is something very wrong with Judaism both secular and religious.