PCR,

For challenging someone like Ron who has done his homework, I recommend that you write “I don’t know that I don’t know” 1000 times or until it sinks in.

Unlike Ron, you have ignored the key to understanding the Jewish problem which is the Talmud. Ron wrote an article about the Talmud which surely factors into his understanding of the education problem.

I don’t think you have ever written about the Talmud. You have constructed your argument like an engineer trying to build a car without wheels. You have entered the domain of a subject that you know nothing about and have greatly weakened you credibility.

Without some understanding of the ripple effect of the Talmud on the Jewish mindset, your shallow and totally out of context discussion of morality is nothing more than philosophical cotton candy.

Ron sees the problem.

“A religion based upon the principle of “Love Thy Neighbor” may or may not be workable in practice, but a religion based upon “Hate Thy Neighbor” might have long-term cultural ripple effects that extend far beyond the direct community of the deeply pious. If nearly all Jews for a thousand or two thousand years were taught to feel a seething hatred toward all non-Jews and also developed an enormous infrastructure of cultural dishonesty to mask that attitude, it is difficult to believe that such an unfortunate history has had absolutely no consequences for our present-day world, or that of the relatively recent past.”

Kevin,

Thanks for your reply concerning the Arab Mind by Raphael Patai.

When I woke up over a decade ago I was spending many days at a very good used bookstore (owned by a Jew) looking at every book on history and politics, about 300 books. From this effort I had a very good idea of what had been circulating and concluded that almost all the books on the shelf were connected to a sophisticated propaganda industry tied to academics, think tanks and special interest institutions. The Arab Mind was no exception.

I also bought the Arab Mind out of curiosity and did not automatically dismiss everything in the book because of my conclusion. From my point of view, the human race is mentally dysfunctional and irrational, and that includes the Arabs. I am more concerned about evolutionary psychology rather than picking sides based on prejudices.

Patai also wrote a book called the Jewish Mind which I have not read. I am very curious as to how he treats the so called Jews. My days of spending my time doing investigation is mostly over, but if you read that book out of curiosity let me know what you think. Maybe Ron has looked at it.

I did ask the owner if he had a copy of the Talmud, and he did but he wouldn’t sell it to me. I wonder why?

By the way, anyone who gets fired at a university for 9/11 comments is ok by me.

AHH

I had come across a number of books that referenced “Jewish interest” but I knew nothing of Judaism until I came across a book titled:

The Talmud Unmasked – The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians by I.B. Pranaitis (1892)

Pranaitis was a Roman Catholic Priest, a master of theology and a professor of the Hebrew language at the Imperial Ecclesiastical Academy of the Roman Catholic Church in Old St. Petersburg Russia.

Judaism for centuries has been the elephant in the room and for good reason. Unlike Christianity, Judaism was a mystery and non Jews were not allowed to pry into their sacred books. This was particularly true of the Jewish Talmud “the teachings”. It was fairly easy to keep it a mystery because very few Christians actually spoke and read Hebrew. Those non Jews who could read Hebrew and dared to translate the Talmud were killed.

From his book:

“The Talmud gets its name from the word Lamud – taught, and means The Teaching. By metonymy it is taken to mean the book which contains the Teaching, which is called Talmud, that is, the doctrinal book which alone fully expounds and explains all the knowledge and teaching of the Jewish people.”

“This being so, I have undertaken to show what the Talmud really teaches about Christians, and thus satisfy the wishes of those who desire to find out about this doctrine from genuine original sources.
To this end I have translated the best known Talmudic books which refer to the Christians, and have arranged these sources in such order as to bring out clearly the picture of a Christian as represented to the Jews by the Talmud.”

“These texts, however, which I have quoted should be sufficient to demonstrate how false are the statements of the Jews when they claim that there is nothing in the Talmud which teaches hatred and enmity for Christians.”

“I realize, however, that, since the truth does not please everyone, there are many who will become my enemies for thus having borne witness to the truth. And I have been reminded of this, both by the laws of the Talmud itself which threatens death to “traitors,” and more so, by the warnings of those who have had experience of the actions which Jews take against those who make known things which are not favorable to them. They all foretold that I would perish at the hands of the Jews.”

“In trying to prevent me from going ahead with my work, some begged me to remember the fate of Professor Charini, who was suddenly killed after he had undertaken to translate the Talmud into the vernacular. Others reminded me of the fate of the monk Didacus of Vilna, a convert from Judaism, who was cruelly murdered; others of those who had been persecuted for having revealed secrets of the Jewish religion. Still others warned me of the danger to those dear to me. “Wszak ciebie zydzi zabija” (but the Jews will kill you), was repeated to me hundreds of times.”

Despite the potential dangers from exposing the Talmud, Pranaitis publishes his book and was later killed as per the 1939 edition by Sanctuary Publishing.

Ariadna

Wishful thinking is often stronger than reason and, unlike brain-washing from outside, by being internally produced, is not perceived as a deception.

Great insight!

Looking into my crystal ball I see a 2500 year old Cult agenda that has defied all common sense about how a small group of people, even with a disconnect in genetic heritage, can jump the genetic train track without loosing their momentum. I cannot grasp, that after all this time and effort, someone like Putin will save the day, unless a “day” is a temporary lull in this agenda.

I do not see a good outcome. It is risky business when too much hope is put on one man. For all that Hitler tried to do for his people, when he died, his movement died. Strong leaders come and go but the Cult keeps on trucking. But I would like to see Notsofast have the last laugh.

Ron,

I don’t disagree that the International Jews behind the Allies saw Stalin’s nationalistic communism as a threat. I suspect that the Internationalist may have been concerned as far back as 1924 and it is reasonable to suspect that many alternatives to counter Stalin were being considered, not just a bombing plan.

But I see other evidence that needs to be factored into the equation.

Consider the book:

FROM MAJOR JORDAN’S DIARIES by George Racey Jordan 1952

How do you factor this book into the equation?

Anyone?

Ron,

Thanks for the reply. I’ll add a little to what you said.

With regards to the title of the article, The Lesser of Two Evils, Quinn would have had a good article had he written it from the perspective of the International Jews.

Consider the dynamics of the looming war that is being pushed by the International Jews, those who are in control of the State Department and Roosevelt.

Forget the individual countries and focus on the real players.

Number 1. The International Jews and their war agenda

Number 2. Stalin and his brand of National Communism

Number 3. Hitler who sees the Internationalist and Stalin’s Communism as an existential threat to the German nation.

From a war game of chess perspective, we have the following situations:

Number 1 views both 2 and 3 as obstacles to their Talmudic one world takeover.

Number 2 views both 1 and 3 as obstacles to his conquest of Europe

Number 3 views Communism as his greatest threat

However, it is Number 1 who has the winning chess move by their control of the State Department and Roosevelt.

After 1921, Stalin was an undesirable in the eyes of Number 1, and he needed to be removed. Stalin became aware of this and proceeded to remove the Internationalist from power within his personalized brand of communism.

Early on, Number 1 funds Hitler’s movement knowing that Hitler has the motive and willpower to fight Stalin. Number 1’s first option is to let Hitler and Stalin slug it out and then Number 1 wins the war through their controlled Allies.

Here is the key to understanding Number 1’s brilliant chess move.

Like everyone else, Number 1 is stunned at Hitler’s economic miracle in only 5 years and a decision is made before 1939 that Hitler must be defeated at all cost, and so Number 1 stops the support of Hitler and throws all of its material and financial support to Stalin, the Lesser of Two Evils. With Hitler removed, Stalin would be taken out at another time and the Communist regime would be back under the control of the Internationalist. The gamble pays off but the Cold War starts.

From all the evidence that I have reviewed, this is how the pieces of the puzzle fit and it explains the extraordinary cooperation between the Internationalist and Stalin in overcoming an existential threat with one of the most extraordinary men of history, you know who!!!

So the question today, without the benefit of hindsight, is…… Who’s on 1st ?

Ron,

I think there’s zero evidence that any substantial portion of Hitler’s funding came from Jews, international or otherwise.

I agree that he probably had a healthy nationalist funding base as his movement progressed and built up membership. If the Internationalist did contribute to Hitler’s movement it wouldn’t be advertised but disguised as to be pointing away from them. So of course you and others will not find evidence that is suitable to you.

We can guide our reasons on lack of evidence that is difficult to find or we can guide our understandings on characteristic evidence of operation and behavior. The International agenda is beating the odds because they seem to always outplay conventional wisdom.

However, they have left us a wide and long trail as to how they operate. Their style is to fund a situation so that adversaries slug it out and that fits the scenario of Stalin coming into power in 1924 and Hitler’s early rise to power.

Why would the International Jews take a chance that their rising catalytic star for a new war would not succeed? Their power comes from their money and they would not let it sit in the bank if they could put it to work.

The Internationalists had just defeated Tzarist Russia by funding Japan in a war to weaken Russia. Why would they not continue with this winning strategy?

I submit a supposed confession of Rakosvsky, who was later put to death by Stalin as an Internationalist enemy.

In the context of a wide scope of evidence, the confession makes sense.
Further, Rakosvsky’s complete 6 hour confession is brilliant. He refers to the top decision making Internationlist as “They”. From his confession:

In 1929, when the National-Socialist Party began to experience a crisis of growth and it had insufficient financial resources, “They” sent their ambassador there. I even know his name: it was one of the Warburgs. In direct negotiations with Hitler they agreed as to the financing of the National-Socialist Party, and the latter received in a couple of years millions of Dollars, sent to it from Wall Street, and millions of Marks from German financiers through Schacht; the upkeep of the S.A. and S.S. and also the financing of the elections which took place, which gave Hitler power, are done on the Dollars and Marks sent by “Them. If it is true that “They” financed Hitler, then that does not mean that they disclosed to him their existence and their aims. The ambassador Warburg presented himself under a false name and Hitler did not even guess his race, he also lied regarding whose representative he was. He told him that he had been sent by the financial circles of Wall Street who were interested in financing the National-Socialist movement with the aim of creating a threat to France, whose governments pursue a financial policy which provokes a crisis in the USA.”

Simply put, our differences in understanding are because of our different ways in which we view events. Your emphasis is on evidence or lack of evidence. In many cases credible evidence is difficult to find or can’t be found. I therefore choose to look at repeating strategies that work. Every crook has a finger print or style of his criminality. The same is true of the Internationalist.

So do we go with evidence that we haven’t found or do we go with a pattern of behavior that produces desired results?

Concerning Jacques Ellul, is his statement below still relevant?

One of my favorite quotes about the opinionated majority is from the book, Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes by Jacques Ellul (1965). Take into consideration that this was written in 1965 when uncontrolled information was not easily accessible. In 1965 he stated the following: 


“The masses are faced with choices and decisions which demand maturity, knowledge, and a range of information which they do not and cannot have. Elections are limited to the selection of individuals, which reduces the problem of participation to its simplest form.

But the individual wishes to participate in other ways than just elections. He wants to be conversant with economic questions. In fact, his government asks him to be. He wants to form an opinion on foreign policy. But in reality he can’t. He is caught between his desire and his inability, which he refuses to accept. For no citizen will believe that he is unable to have opinions.

Public opinion surveys always reveal that people have opinions even on the most complicated questions, except for a small minority (usually the most informed and those who have reflected most). The majority prefers expressing stupidities to not expressing any opinion: this gives them the feeling of participation.

For this they need simple thoughts, elementary explanations, a “key” that will permit them to take a position, and even ready-made opinions. As most people have the desire and at the same time the incapacity to participate, they are ready to accept a propaganda that will permit them to participate, and which hides their incapacity beneath explanations, judgments, and news, enabling them to satisfy their desire without eliminating their incompetence.

If we look at the average man, and not at those few intellectuals whose special business it is to be informed, what do we actually mean when we say this man is informed? It means that, aside from spending eight hours at work and two more commuting, this man reads a newspaper or, more precisely, looks at the headlines and glances at a few stories. He may also listen to news broadcasts, or watch it on TV; and once a week he will look at the photos in a picture magazine. This is the case of the reasonably well informed man, that is, of 98 percent of all people.”

Korn,

I recommend that you check your sources to find out if they are “in the system”.
Took me two minutes to find the following info on Winston Groom:

As well as being a talented novelist, Groom is also a serious student of history. One of his books, the prize-winning Shrouds of Glory, published by Grove Atlantic, is a meticulous, atmospheric history of the little known, but very dramatic, Western Campaign of the Civil War, inspired by tales of his great-grandfather who fought for the Confederate Army.

Groom also wrote for numerous magazines, including Vanity Fair, Southern Living, Condé Nast Traveler, Newsweek, Esquire, and the New York Times Magazine, and contributed editorial articles to the New York Times and the Washington Post.

He became a frequent lecturer — both as the author of Forest Gump and as a respected student of history, and familiar face on television, appearing regularly on network morning talk shows, as well as PBS’s Frontline and CBS’s Sunday Morning.

Groom is “in the system’s” gravy train. Don’t expect him to write something that will cause his train to derail.

Ron,

Your efforts to reexamine historical topics that appear to be chiseled in stone are most appreciated by your readership. I am in basic agreement with your assessment and would like to add just a few thoughts.

The 1953 Reece Committee investigation was also digging up the Communist infiltration into this country. Unlike McCarthy’s highly publicized circus, the Reece Committee investigation was quietly shut down and their very incriminating evidence that was recorded on dictaphone tapes went missing as revealed by Norman Dodd, their lead investigator. The reason for this I believe was due to the character and personality differences between Dodd and McCarthy. The Judaic Cult is very adept at exploiting personality weakness and I suspect they understood McCarthy’s vulnerabilities and they gave him enough rope to hang himself with ample media coverage.

Roy Cohn was on the board of the American League Against Communism which was I suspect was only a facade to promote infiltration. by the Judaic Cult. It worked and McCarthy took the hook, line and sinker. Roy, as McCarthy’s attorney, was able to steer McCarthy’s well intentioned efforts into circus territory which was exploited by the press.

Norman Dodd was no fool and his 1953 investigation was totally shut down with very little publicity by the Republican National Committee which was also controlled by the Judaic Cult.

I have read that McCarthy went for a check up in a hospital and didn’t come out alive. Relatives wanted an autopsy, but that never happened. Maybe you or your readers may have more info concerning the autopsy request and if there is any truth in this claim.

Hua Bin,

Much of the Judaic experience appears to be outside the probability envelope of human traits and potentials. This elephant in the room is a big stretch for most on this site, including our host.

Could you chart out the Judaic experience with respect to probability in a future article? I suspect you could come to some reasonable conclusions based on probability questions that would not be much different from those few who are bold enough to venture into reasonable speculation on this topic.

I recommend the book titled The Trail of the Serpent 1936 as a starter for this topic.

Good question Mike

A good investigator will know how to use probability analysis.

Concerning the moon landing claim, there are a few very basic non scientific questions that can cast serious doubt on the official narrative. Asking the right questions become a challenge for those who are concerned about their “respectability”.

Alanchik,

Your contemplations are several levels above the TUR average. Such thoughts are representative of out of the box thinking, a genetic predisposition personality type.

A very small percentage of truth seekers have an awareness that something is not right with the worldly view of historic events and therefore they dig deeper for clues.

As an example, I had read the Ra Material 30 years ago and then reread it again a few years ago. The material is “far out” and difficult to digest, however page 159 caught my attention. On January 31, 1981 the following message was delivered by Ra:

Questioner: Can you tell me the origin of the Ten Commandments?

Ra: I am Ra. The origin of these commandments follows the law of negative entities impressing information upon positively oriented mind/ body/spirit complexes. The information attempted to copy positivity while retaining negative characteristics.

Questioner: Was this done by the Orion group?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Questioner: What was their purpose in doing this?

Ra: I am Ra. The purpose of the Orion group, as mentioned before, is conquest and enslavement. This is done by finding and establishing an elite and causing others to serve the elite through various devices such as the laws you mentioned and others given by this entity.

Is the Orion Group the unknown and alien Ruler who is behind the many mystery cults and pseudo religions?

As Disraeli said in 1841, “these hidden forces defy research”.

Whatever the truth may be, the mystery is probably beyond our understanding at this level, but it is good to see commenters like yourself who are bringing these ideas to the surface.

ariadna,

The American government’s takeover, and indeed the takeover of its financial system, government at all levels and all its institutions, the media, education and entertainment was being undertaken long before Israel even existed. It is not Israel. It is global Jewish power.

Good call. Surely Guyenot would understand that Israeli power is born out of Judaic power. Should we give him the benefit of the doubt that he was standing too close to the picture to give a wide perspective? Or should we be disappointed that that Guyenot is writing his articles too quickly?

I see an uncomfortable number of willing experts, like Larry Johnson on Judging Freedom who keep making “woke up yesterday” comments that parrot Hollywood movies that unfortunately cut their credibility to the bone. It is possible that such comments are necessary for staying in the expert witness box.

The benefit of the doubt would conclude that Guyenot thought he hit a home run when in fact it was only a foul ball. Good call.

J2

If you are going to box with the Truth, at least try to be interesting. Reading your comments is like waiting for a shadow boxer to deliver a knock out punch.

Anon001

It is said that if you want to understand a person, then go check out his library,

Annacath has you pegged for a Troll. Can’t say that I blame him after looking up the authors of the books you posted.

Is your post a good example of Chutzpah or are you sincerely trying to wake up an ignorant TUR readership?

Avro Manhattan (jewish) operated a radio station called Radio Freedom for the Allies during WWII.

Gideon Greif Is an Israeli historian specializing in the Holocaust

“John Cornwell is in the department of history and philosophy of science at Cambridge University. He is a regular feature writer at the Sunday Times (London) and the author and editor of four books on science, including Power to Harm, on the Louisville Prozac trial, as well as Hitler’s Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII and Breaking Faith: Can the Catholic Church Save Itself? Cornwell shows how John Paul’s increasing sense of providential rightness profoundly influenced his reactions to turbulence in the secular world and within the Church, including the 9/11 attacks, the pedophilia scandals in the United States, the clash between Islam and Christianity.” Blame it on the Church!!!

Diana,

Just wanted to say thank you for writing the article Thank You, Ed Herman back in 2017 and giving Ed Herman the credit due for the book Manufacture of Consent. Although this book is too limited in its perspective with regards to its revisions, it is an important book that is relative today. Reading that book and other related books on the deception industry is highly recommended, especially concerning the infiltration and control of history and political science at the universities.

Bardon Kaldian

I thank you for your info, you appear to be quite knowledgeable on the Serb/Croatia relationship. I, on the other hand, know or understand nothing of this topic.

However, as I read your writings on this subject, I must take into account a statement that you had made elsewhere:

As a member of one nation, in this case Croatian- I am who I am. This is not something one can choose (those who think otherwise actually don’t belong anywhere- as Seneca said: “Who is everywhere, he is nowhere” ). There are aspects I like & there are the ones I dislike. But, if trying to be realistic, I would say: I am glad (not “proud”- I find this adjective silly) I belong to the nation that has survived for centuries in almost impossible circumstances & has achieved modern full statehood, something which historically more important & culturally more significant peoples like Catalonians or Scots, didn’t.

Your Croatian “gladness” is typical of tribal identity and at a fundamental level we are in disagreement just as I am in disagreement with Seneca’s quote. When you are thinking like something you are really not thinking. You may be 100% correct on this issue but can you blame an ignoramus for pointing this out.

You further state elsewhere that the Serbs:

they’re doomed to irrationality & cognitive dissonance with the modern, rational world.

A “rational world” is another fundamental disagreement.
Despite what I perceive as very strong nationalism that defines the rational and irrational, I find some of your other comments (from other writings) interesting and worthy of exploration. I will give them a looking over and maybe we can find some common ground. You appear to be a very interesting person.

Bardon,

You are describing the egocentric state of mind which is normal. But the egocentric state of mind is fundamentally irrational which is also normal. Do you really want to be trapped in the normal?

The collective identity is the consequence a survival program to persevere, protect and function within an authoritative social system.

What I am proposing to you is a transition from the programed mind into a state of awareness. In this state of mind you will loose your metal prison of collective identity and cultivate an awareness of Self. Many call it the autonomous Self.

I highly suggest that you explore this further. All the books and learning cannot help you cultivate an awareness of Self. It is not easy but necessary if you want to advance as a human being. If you think of yourself as a Croatian then you will be stuck in an egocentric state of mind. I am not discussing geopolitics, but fundamentals of advancing to a higher state of mind.

Tereza,

Good job on the work that you are doing.

For your WWII project I recommend a book that I am currently reading.

Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny by R H S Stolfi 2011

If you have problems finding a pdf let me know. Archive.org should have a free pdf.

This book has the details that are omitted in the official narratives concerning Hitler’s personality.

This is a must read for your project.

Keep up the excellent work.

Tereza,

Before addressing your question I would like to pay my respects to James Smith for bringing up the very important topic of identity with respect to the concerns of the TUR readership. I refer you to my May 30, 2025 comment concerning Bardon Kaldian’s focus on identity.

As a student in the Course In Miracles you can appreciate my position that reinforcing identity is not the way to go to liberate oneself from the Cult’s masterful manipulation of identity consciousness. To the point, we need to liberate ourselves from the identity program and expand our state of awareness. Short of a miracle, the human species is moving too slow in that direction and we are dependent upon enlightened leaders to disengage from the Cult’s web.

Concerning your reply: My acknowledgement of your good work was about your video on your WWII project and had nothing to do with the specifics of your reply. However, your position on Hitler and the Nazi party could benefit from reading Stolfi’s book which is a combination of history and psychoanalysis which fills in gaps and rectifies the distortions of the vilifying conventional wisdom.

Concerning the bigger picture: I recommend the the book, The Trail Of The Serpent 1936 which can be found on archive.org.

As you have discovered, the Judaic agenda is only the most recent attempt for perverting and controlling human consciousness. I recommend that you review the video of professor David Jacobs which I posted March 14, 2025.

Also of interest is an exchange dated January 31, 1981 from the Ra Material. I mention this in my May 28, 2025 comment.

Considering the wide and deep perspective of information available on this very troubling topic, any efforts short of a transformation of human consciousness will fail to liberate the human race from this threatening “foreign” agenda.

Concerning further contact and exchange of information: If I subscribe to your site, will I be able to send you pdf documents? Would this be the best way to follow up with sharing information?

Kevin,

Your articles are generally informative and interesting. Your argument for free expression on TUR would be valid if the potential readership were less emotional. Coming across as a beacon of light for Muslim thought on TUR is not pragmatic.

Consider the Fatigues: Christian Fatigue, Judaic Fatigue, Liberal Fatigue, Religious Fatigue, Muslim Fatigue, Black Fatigue and more.

TUR has transitioned from Liberal Fatigue articles to mostly Judaic Fatigue articles. What I am hearing from the replies is Muslim Fatigue.

Ariadna is not trusting of your religion. I am not trusting of any religion.

I believe the winner of the arguments put forth is Armageddon. His comment is pragmatic and most appropriate for the intent of TUR.

You have a following at TUR who are forgiving and flexible. But Armageddon makes a good point that new readership may have too many hangups that still need to be processed.

Thank you Philip Giraldi,

Many claim to be patriotic, but on close examination their patriotism falls short, cut off by self centered concerns of appearance, kind of like the icing on the cake but without the cake.

If we were to categorize the degrees of patriotism, what would we use as a standard?

I suspect that the USS Liberty and the 9/11 attack would be high on the list, if not on the top as a standard for judging patriotism. Using this as a litmus test for true patriotism we could judge the patriotism of the popular “patriotic commentators”.

I heard Judge Napolitano acknowledge the USS Liberty a few days ago. Good for the Judge. Larry Johnson has a child’s view of 9/11 and Douglas Macgregor has stated that Israel is our friend!

It would be good to have some feed back from the TUR readership as to who is stepping up to the plate on these two events and who is pussy footing around these events.

Many of the leading commentators on youtube videos such as Judging Freedom, The Duran, and many others are like broken records concerning the “bad Nazi” Hollywood theme. They rarely attempt to distinguish between the Judaic take over of the old Russia and the New Russia fighting the Judaic control of NATO. They cannot or will not present the historical evidence that Hitler’s Germany and Putin’s Russia historically have much in common with a Judaic agenda.

What I find curiously disturbing is that Putin and Lavrov play the same game which leads me to speculation.

I have heard highly respected commentators such as John Mearsheimer and Jeffery Sachs also repeat the ”bad Nazi” Hollywood narrative without proper intellectual support. This applies to the Holocaust topic as well.

Their inconsistent intellectual presentations are prime targets for those who a paying attention.
Considering the gravity of the crimes against humanity, let’s not forget the 30M+ Christian victims of the old Judaic Russia, these commentators’ obvious shortcoming in historical intellectual honesty is all the more magnified. Either properly debate the subject or don’t bring the subject up.

Let’s give credit deserved. Ron Unz has shown strong intellectual honesty in his efforts to properly debate these subjects which I suspect the Judge has probably absorbed.

Thanks for bringing this issue up. I suspect that many on TUR share your disappointment.

Mocissepvis, good call.

I believe you spotted a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Curious I found good confirmation that Jorge Besada is a clever wolf on TUR.

From another article that he wrote, I have extracted some quotes on a subject that I am well versed in. In this article he takes off some of his sheep’s clothing so that the viewer can see the characteristics of the wolf that he is.

The Economic Fallacies Underpinning Hitler’s Disastrous Views 4/25/25 by Jorge Besada

“Regardless of all the suffering men like Hitler caused”

“Hitler was one of those “misguided ideologues” who did not understand the vital role freedom and emerging private sector businesses and their competition played”

“Hitler, being a man of his time—like other major racists like Churchill and Roosevelt—also fooled himself into believing that race or tiny biological differences within humans were a vital factor for socioeconomic prosperity”

“Hitler’s anti-Jewish fallacies significantly grew from misinterpreting inadvertent Jewish overrepresentation in the horrific Bolshevik revolution and resulting Soviet Communist calamity, with some deliberate malicious plot masterminded by Jews and/or tied to their “race.”

Besada doesn’t even try to hide his pro Jewish sentiments. He quotes from the book THE JEWISH CENTURY by the Jewish author, Yuri Slezkine, and comes to the conclusion that:

“In just 13 years—from 1927-1940—the Soviet secret police destroyed 29,084 Christian Orthodox Churches, leaving less than 500, while killing an estimated 80,000-100,000 priests. This erroneously made it seem to naïve thinkers like Hitler—and sadly many to this day—that “the Jews” were purposely annihilating Christianity due to sheer malice instead of just being over-represented in a disastrous ideology.”

There are many on TUR that can see that Besada’s ideas on Hitler, economics, and evolutionary biology are unsupported opinions that carry no weight. But of course a wolf would know this.
I suggest that Besada go read the Talmud and take a good hard look in the mirror.

Israel Shamir,

I have looked at some of your early articles on TUR and found your September 20, 2001 article interesting, titled A Yiddishe Medina. I recommend your article as it is appropriate reading for this debate. From your article:

We, children of emancipated Jewish parents, are as surprised as anybody. Nothing prepared us for the miraculous recovery of Jewry. Just recently it was on its way out, indeed, proclaimed dead; and we had come to consider ourselves free men. Within our lifetime, things have changed drastically, and now we are being called upon to declare allegiance to this body, or suffer ostracism and humiliation, probably loss of livelihood, or worse. Jewry (please do not confuse this term with the millions of descendents of medieval Jews) has regained its place in world politics, and taken over the mind of the only superpower, the US.
Isaac Deutscher, a Jewish Marxist and a biographer of Trotsky, was among the first Jews to notice this phenomenon. He proposed in his essay Who is a Jew (published in the Jewish Quarterly, London 1966) to distinguish between ‘Jews’ and ‘Jewry’. While Jews are individuals of various opinions and ways of life, Jewry is a quasi-national body with its own leadership and agenda. In his opinion, Jewry was on its way to disappearance, but from the ashes of the World War Two ‘the phoenix of Jewry has risen’. ‘I would have preferred Jews to survive and Jewry to perish’, he wrote, but “the extermination of Jews gave a new lease of life to Jewry”.

Walt King

In my many years of investigating, the adage that “you can’t see the forest because of the trees” carries much weight. Other than the creation of a homeland, the Talmudic Jews had a substantial reason for getting the United States into WWI.

The Jewish Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913 which became the most important pivot point in US history. So the big picture question is this:

Why wouldn’t the Jews who now have control of the money supply not want an extended war for the benefit of the financial gains from the extended cost of the war??

Let’s not forget the telegram found in the Carnegie Foundation’s minutes of the meeting which advised Wilson not to end the war too soon!

Whatever other reasons surfaced, this one was better left unsaid.

My focus here is on the credibility of viewing evidence or the lack of evidence outside the lens of a bigger picture that carries much weight.

Very good article.

Ron Unz

Concerning the telegram found in the minutes of the meeting of the Carnegie Foundation that advised Pres. Wilson not to end the war too soon:

In 1953 Norman Dodd was appointed lead investigator into the un-American activities of the great Foundations for the Reese Congressional Special Committee. The Committee’s investigation was getting too close to understanding the forces who were deliberately steering the country in the wrong direction. Unfortunately the Committee’s efforts were sabotaged.

However Norman Dodd gave an interview in 1982 of the incredible evidence that was found and later disappeared. His interview is an easy find.

There is a transcript and a video. Watch the video. Note the extraordinary composure and clarity of Norman Dodd who was 83 at the time of the interview with the historian G Edward Griffin. He is highly credible. Both can be found on archive.org.

There is much information revealed that brings into focus the bigger picture of why war and “perpetual war for perpetual peace” is so important for the Judaic agenda. Your efforts to thoroughly investigate Dodd’s findings will be very worthwhile. The essence of this thread of information is woven throughout the tapestry of Judaic influenced history.

From the transcript of Norman Dodd’s interview:

We are now at the year nineteen hundred and eight, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. And, in that year, the trustees meeting, for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year, in a very learned fashion. And the question is this: Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people? And they conclude that, no more effective means to that end is known to humanity, than war. So then, in 1909, they raise the second question, and discuss it, namely, how do we involve the United States in a war?
Well, I doubt, at that time, if there was any subject more removed from the thinking of most of the People of this country, than its involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt very much if many people even knew where the Balkans were. And finally, they answer that question as follows: we must control the State Department.
And then, that very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? They answer it by saying, we must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country and, finally, they resolve to aim at that as an objective. Then, time passes, and we are eventually in a war, which would be World War I. At that time, they record on their minutes a shocking report in which they dispatch to President Wilson a telegram cautioning him to see that the war does not end too quickly.

Thanks for your inquiry.

BTDT and Ron Unz

I had found the same info last night, and more, in just a quick search. Good catch and thanks for sharing.

The point to be made is that there are a lot of “details” to support or not to support a position depending on ones worldview in which the common denominator of those with a worldview is a sense of satisfaction that they are mostly correct in their interpretation of the limited information that they have.

Without an understanding of a bigger picture of the underlying current of events, these details support random events that may or may not have significant meaning. You may have many Santa Clause moments, but if you can’t fit the pieces together to bring into clear focus a clear theme, then you just as well be looking at some modern art where your imagination becomes the reality.

Ron, you have shared many Santa Clause moments with us, but what is your assessment of the bigger picture?

BTDT AND HOBNOB

I would hope that Ron would acknowledge your efforts. Your info and conclusions fit in with the bigger picture that comes into focus from other paths of inquiry.

My very first two comments at TUR several years back were about methodology of inquiry and analysis and was directed at Ron, who I have much respect for but differ on method of inquiry. In a nut shell, differences of method of inquiry can have a genetic predisposition and those who are at the opposing ends of this potential will many times clash in their views.

You may find my two comments helpful in understanding this apparent issue that has raised its head a number of times on TUR.

Kingsmeg

Concerning THE psychopathic liars:

It takes two to tango. The vast majority that I know have been and still are “psychopathic” listeners and readers.

And yes, if it weren’t for Notsofast this site would bring tears to my eyes.

Ron

Good thing I didn’t hold my breath waiting for this article, but good job. In my very first comment in 2022 I recommended John DeCamp’s book to you as a must read.

I would like to emphasize and add the following:

The Nebraska State Senate and its investigating committee were totally unprepared for the resulting consequences of their “simple” investigation. Their efforts resulted in the deaths of FIFTEEN people linked to the Franklin case, including several children, the lead state investigator and his son and the former CIA Director, William Colby. The damage control tactics to contain this investigation caught the committee totally off guard and as a result their efforts lost traction. Severe Cognitive Dissonance afflicted all involved.

After one of the witnesses was ritually killed, the psychiatrist Dr Densen-Gerber addressed the investigation committee on the stress they were under.

“I want to say one thing. I would not want the committee to disband. I think: that that is not in the best interest of the average Nebraska citizen for the reasons that I have said. I would also not want the material to be turned over to any other committee. Because it takes two to three years for the average person to get through the automatic denial that goes along with this kind of material. The first human defense mechanism against untenable horrific facts is to say that they don’t exist.”

How deep is the rabbit hole? I not holding my breath for you to find out, but given enough time I think you will eventually find out, but I will be long dead:)

Alanchik,

You are too far down the rabbit hole for most at the TUR. Much of what you are saying is slowly coming out but the transition from “business as usual” to “a Helen Keller Moment” has a genetic potential that has much resistance for such a deviation.

Much of what is taking place is beyond the business as usual playing field where business as usual reasoning doesn’t work. I would suggest a stepping stone in that direction.

The book, The Trail of the Serpent 1939 is a good starter for expanding one’s reach into the rabbit hole. Should be able to find it on archive.org.

Ron is off to a good start. There is much more evidence to ponder which I will present if the appropriate opening presents itself.

Thanks for your contributions.

Ron,

Finding William Colby floating in a river near his camp days before his testimony at a congressional hearing is suspicious.

Back in the 70’s I interviewed for a job at what I thought was a summer camp for boys and girls. Although young and naive I sensed that something was not right with the children and the manager and wisely did not pursue the job. Two weeks later the camp made the papers as owned by a pedophile ring.

In the late 60’s I personally met Clay Shaw and listened to him briefly discuss his trial. I was just a late teenager and didn’t know much about the Kennedy assassination so I didn’t have any questions for him. Garrison had evidence that he was seen with Lee Harvey Oswald. In support of Garrison’s evidence I can say that no person stuck in my mind like Clay Shaw, an unforgettable face chiseled in stone, not a face to forget.

This brings me to Ed Haslam’s book Dr. Mary’s Monkey. Highly recommend that you read.
I met Ed Haslam at a book signing and asked him if he was worried about being killed. His reply: They can kill me anytime so I just don’t worry about it. At this time I had a good understanding of the bigger picture and noticed that an uninvited photographer had entered the room and started taking pictures from different angles. I suspected he was getting photos of everyone at the signing. I left before he got my picture.

Since Ed’s book is about incredible evidence at Tulane University concerning Clay Shaw, Lee Harvey Oswald and their buddies and an unsuspecting Dr. Mary Sherman who paid the ultimate price for being at the wrong place at the wrong time, I point out the testimony of Valerie Wolf also concerning the abuse of children at Tulane University, New Orleans.

This evidence and much more is beyond the limits business as usual.
I hope this additional info is interesting and maybe helpful. Keep up the good work.

Anon 377 and Kevin Barrett

On what evidence do you base your opinion that William Colby was killed over his connection to the Franklin case? What connection do you believe William Colby had to the Franklin case?

Good question and a reasonable answer would be that since the Wikipedia states “Coby’s death triggered conspiracy theories that his death had been caused by foul play”, then anything stated by the Wikipedia as a conspiracy theory is probably true! 🙂

Colby, an experienced outdoorsman with experience in canoeing is found floating near his canoe near his camp on April 27, 1996.

Did Colby know too much? Was he a threat to the establishment?

Colby was CIA Director from September 1973 to January 1976. From the Wikipedia:

At the time of the Senate hearings to confirm his appointment, Colby was relentlessly grilled about The Family Jewels, a secret 693-page report ordered by Schlesinger, directed by Colby, and compiled by CIA’s own Inspector General’s Office. It dealt with what Colby calls “some mistakes,” specifically CIA abuses ranging from assassination plans to dosing people with mind-control drugs to domestic spying. The Family Jewels are a set of reports detailing illegal, inappropriate and otherwise sensitive activities conducted by the Central Intelligence Agency from 1959 to 1973.[1] William Colby, the CIA director who received the reports, dubbed them the “skeletons in the CIA’s closet”.[1]

My impression of Colby was that he truly believed that he was serving the best interest of the Country and he knew too much and became a threat to the Cult.

The Franklin Cover Up may have been the event that the Cult had to suppress at all cost.
Colby was personal friends with John DeCamp. The children’s testimony implicated the White House. One of the boys had a photographic memory and on the witness stand he detailed the rooms and furnishings of the White House to confirm that he had been molested at the White House. The evidence he had given was confirmed.

John DeCamp would best be the judge if Colby was killed by the Cult because he had detailed conversations with Colby about his investigations. Colby was a serious risk for future investigations. Colby did not fit in with the Cult’s program and there were probably other reasons for him to also be silenced.

Let’s ask Kevin Barrett for his opinion on this issue since Kevin actually interviewed John DeCamp.

Kevin,

I have a sympathetic respect for your truth seeking efforts and especially for your desire to spread the word despite the risk to you.

Although my efforts were not at your level, in 2007 I woke up and started giving lectures at fire stations, to engineers and architects and at my work.

In the process I lost many friends and relatives and I began to see the state of mind of the vast majority. It was a very depressing time.

In addition, just before I woke up I was being recruited by some zionist, for some unknown activity, but that relationship terminated when I woke up. I exited on good terms with a friendly warning.

Within one year I had changed so much I was no longer the same person. It has been a life changing experience, an awakening to a higher level.

I would love to meet you at the pub and share some tales, but I suspect you don’t drink!

Ariadna

Concerning the compromised Dennis Hastert:

Sibel Edmonds’ testimony implicates Israel and the American-Turkish Council with extreme crimes against the United States. From wiretaps that were never released:

Edmonds also hears discussions about the laundering of drug smuggling profits, the selling of classified military technologies, and a scheme to secretly give Republican Congressman Dennis Hastert tens of thousands of dollars in exchange for political favors and information. She becomes convinced that the American-Turkish Council (ATC) is being used as a front for criminal activity. [ANTI-WAR (.COM), 7/1/2004; ANTI-WAR (.COM), 8/15/2005; VANITY FAIR, 9/2005]

Truth,

Concerning the OK bombing, John DeCamp has a chapter in The Franklin Cover-up on his involvement as an attorney in an OK bombing trial. He reveals the destruction of evidence and a cover-up. A must read on the OK bombing debate.

Keep up the good work!

Notsofast

Synagogue of Satan assets are jumping on the band wagon of anti Israel emotions to make themselves look good. Jeffrey Sachs is one of these assets.

Today on Judge Napolitano’s Judging Freedom, Jeffery Sachs shocked me with a blatant misleading statement that the genocide in Gaza has nothing to do with “Jewish values” but only with the Israeli government. Such statements have no historical back up.

Has Sachs not read the Old Testament or explored the Talmud?

Sachs and other self serving opportunist do not deserve the compartmentalized respect that so many give them when their very narrow viewpoint is so tarnished by the exclusion and distortion of the bigger picture.

Good to see you calling out these self serving assets of the Synagogue of Satan. Let’s not forget that Ron has given us a good platform to call it as we see it.

Jeffrey

The Synagogue of Satan’s Zionist enthusiasm has backfired, exposing the evils that have always lurked behind the curtain of camouflage and deception. Now that Judaic egocentric stupidity has exposed the Serpent within Judaism to the mass public, the better face of Judaism steps forward to try and patch up the Judaic image. Nice try Jeffrey, but Judaism is a cult that is playing humanity, including those with a Judaic state of mind, for a fool. Those who are aware of the Judaic deception will be asking whether you are a fool or a well paid deceiver.

Felpudinho

I have far more respect for a man who stays true to his tribe….. Sachs hasn’t sold out his people, which is a lot more than I can say for most US politicians.

Applying your knuckle dragging definition of respect to the one and only Ron Unz?

Drum roll………………………………………….

Jeffrey,

I would really like to believe that your statements were in good faith but……………….. your statements don’t ring true and give the impression of a game and true tribal allegiance.
For those who understand the game, you statements have the same effect as putting a band aid on cancer.

As an example, Roy Cohn also played the good cop to infiltrate and take advantage of McCarty’s well intentioned but naive and foolish efforts. Roy disguised himself as an anti communist.
This is typical Judaic good cop, bad cop strategy.

Are you taking advantage of the obvious to sell the same old hat Jewish victim mentality? Everything will be ok if we go back to pre Nuttyyahoo times?

“inquiring minds will ask how the descendants and co‑religionists of the Jews murdered by Hitler’s genocidal regime came to become genocidaires.”

Why do you not debate this Holocaust issue on the Unz Review? Inquiring minds will find out that the official Holocaust story doesn’t have lags to stand on. You can’t be that naive and gullible!

“Nazi Holocaust lent credence among Jews to the Zionist”

And you Jeffrey are part of the problem because you keep this unsupported narrative afloat.

“Israel’s survival among nations is at risk today as it has become a pariah state”

Is this what your game is all about? As a human being, are your torn between the reality of Judaism and saving your tribal identity?

“The majority of the American people, are rightly revulsed by Israel’s brutality and are also turning their support massively to the Palestinian cause.”

When the majority of people wake up it is time to go to the next level of deception which is to save Israel and the Jewish image. Persuade us that this is not so!

“Only the Trump administration can end the genocide.. Trump must force Israel to see reality”

Great statement for the naive and gullible. You know that only the Jews have the power to change the zionist direction.

“salvage Israel’s standing in the world”

Is this the game that is being played, save Israel and patch up the Jewish image so that the Judaic human enslavement agenda can go on?

To put your statements in perspective consider the following:

The Jewish high Mason, Cremieux, founder and president of Alliance-Israelite-Universelle, said in his manifesto, i860: “ The net which Israel now casts over the terrestrial globe enlarges and extends. . . . Our power is immense; learn to turn that power to our cause. The day is not far distant when all the riches, all the treasures of the earth, will become the property of the children of Israel.”

“The Talmud is not a divine gift given to people. The Jewish people created it. But on the other hand, it created the Jewish people. In so many ways, we’re Talmudic Jews, whether we believe in it or not. It’s a central pillar for understanding anything about Judaism, more than the Bible.” Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz Talmud scholar

“All previous attempts of assimilation were based on the wrong assumption that the Jews could be adequate sons of the host nation, while at the same time preserving their religion and remaining ‘the Chosen people.’” But “ethnic assimilation is impossible if Judaism is preserved; and conversely Judaism collapses in case of ethnic assimilation. Jewish religion perpetuates the national isolation — there is nothing you can do about this fact.” Arthur Koestler

“Let us state at the outset that, in using the term “Zionism”, we are referring not merely to the political tendency which officially took at the end of the 19th century, but also to the ideology upon which that tendency is based and which existed long before the founders of modern Zionism (Hess in 1862, Pinsker in 1882, Herzl in 1896, Ahad Ha-‘Am in 1902, Jabotinsky in 1906) published their views in the press. This ideology has led to Zionism being practiced through the centuries and is still menacingly active today. Today there is no end to this activity in sight.” Vladimir Stepin, The Nature of Zionism.

There are hundreds, if not thousands, of such quotes. How do you explain the quotes with your rationale?

And check out this web site. Over 2000 American entertainment Jews support Israel! Can you change their mind?: How about you go after the Jewish community!!!!!!!

https://www.creativecommunityforpeace.com/blog/2023/10/12/israel-under-attack-open-letter/

“All previous attempts of assimilation were based on the wrong assumption that the Jews could be adequate sons of the host nation, while at the same time preserving their religion and remaining ‘the Chosen people.’” But “ethnic assimilation is impossible if Judaism is preserved; and conversely Judaism collapses in case of ethnic assimilation. Jewish religion perpetuates the national isolation—there is nothing you can do about this fact.”
Arthur Koestler

Horace Kallen
Louis Brandeis
Rabbi Stephen S Wise

and fellow Parushim

should become names as well-known to TUR as are Netanyahu, AIPAC, ADL, and the like.

Like the squirrel who could not retain the glorious nut of choseness without unclenching his paw and become an “adequate son of the host nation,” Horace Kallen created the notion of “cultural pluralism” and taught it to Louis Brandeis, leader of world-wide zionism in its early days and run-up to world wars.

It is to that giant of extended investigative journalism, Alison Weir, that I owe my introduction to the Parushim. In her book, Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of how the U.S. was used to create Israel, (accessible online: https://archive.org/details/alisonweiragainstourbetterjudgment-Alison-Weir ) (which every TUR advocate FOR Israel and FOR an AIPAC-FREE America should read carefully), Weir discusses the Parushim and links the source for that information:

The Parushim
Even more surprising to this author – and even less well-known both to the public and to
academics – is Brandeis’s membership in a secret society that covertly pushed Zionism both in the
U.S. and internationally.

Israeli professor Dr. Sarah Schmidt first reported this information in an article about the society
published in 1978 in the American Jewish Historical Quarterly She also devoted a chapter to the
society in a 1995 book. Author and former New York Times editor Peter Grose, sympathetic to
Zionism also reported on it in both a book and several subsequent articles.

According to Grose, a highly regarded author, Brandeis was a leader of “an elitist secret society
called the Parushim, the Hebrew word for ‘Pharisees’ and ‘separate,’ which grew out of Harvard’s
Menorah Society. ”
_____
Sarah Schmidt, “The Parushim: A Secret Episode in American Zionist History,” American
Jewish Historical Quarterly 65, Dec (1975): 121-39. Online at
https://ifamericansknew.org/history/parushim.html
or
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880453?read-now=1&seq=5#page_scan_tab_contents

The outsized role of the above-mentioned men and the secret society they formed in bringing about the zionist colonization of Palestine; in maneuvering American and British officials to that end; of propagandizing the vilification of Germany and Hitler; and in fomenting the wars in Europe cannot be overstated.

We MUST turn this ship around and head it in the direction Kallen, Brandeis, Wise, etc. charted for it; namely, the wars in Europe, especially the second war against Germany, was brought about in order to facilitate the Jewish colonization of Palestine, and, as seems to be a pattern in Jewry, to destroy the nations that had earlier given Jews refuge, security and prosperity.

Of all people Jeffrey Sachs must know this and should be ashamed of himself to be so brazen as to perpetuate the false narrative of a “Nazi” genocide of Jews.

Zumbuddi

You point out the importance of secret societies. Many important people had first hand knowledge of these secret societies and dropped hints about their existence. For example:

“These secret societies, formed when needed, are detached into groups distinct and apparently opposed, professing respectively and in turn the most contrary opinions of the day, so as to direct, apart and with confidence, all parties, political, religious, economic, and literary. They, in order to receive common direction, are again united to an unknown centre, where this powerful source is hidden which seeks thus invisibly to control all earthly sceptres. . . and without doubt all these secret societies are themselves, through the skill of certain of their chiefs, controlled and directed according to the ideas and orders of an Unknown Supreme Committee who governs the world.” Hoene Wronski

Jewish secret societies are discussed in two books:

Light-bearers of Darkness by Inquire Within (Boswell Publishing Co. London 1931)

Trail of The Serpent by Inquire Within (Boswell Publishing Co. London 1936)

“These revolutionary mysteries first appear as pseudo-religions, until by means of some kind of seemingly religious uplift the necessary link with the master-mind is formed. Then it becomes openly political and revolutionary, subverting all aspects of the nation’s life, seeking by internationalism and universalism to unify all peoples, socially, economically, politically, in arts and religion, preparing for some New Era, some New Heaven and New Earth.”

Judaism is a cult hiding behind a pseudo religion. Being “Jewish” is a state of mind that is controlled and manipulated.

“In conclusion, these, then, are the results of our further investigations into the many secret and occult societies both of yesterday and to-day, as published in the Patriot from 1930 to 1935. Everything seems to point to the cabalistic and revolutionary Jew as the Master-mind working behind them, using them as pawns in his great gamble and world-wide conspiracy, which would disintegrate and destroy, not only the Christian Faith, but the entire traditions of Western civilisation. His weapon of control and attack being the Triangle of Fire, these magnetic-forces of Life which can both slay and make alive, and by which he professes to free and enlighten the peoples, only the more surely to bind, unify, and enslave them under some unknown and alien Ruler.”

Jeffrey Sachs is probably representative of many Jews who are caught in a perpetual identity crises that is being promoted by this Judaic Cult that probably has it origin with a non human entity. This cult social engineering is a form of psychological entrapment.

Sachs, basically a good person, has one foot caught in this entrapment, thus he rationalizes his identity crisis. Freud spoke of his own Jewish identity crisis.

Ron Unz is a special breed having a genetic predisposition that makes him somewhat immune from having a Jewish identity crisis. This is his strongest asset, not his IQ or his method of inquiry.

The consequences of a perpetual identity crisis keeps the individual in a football mental state of mind that over reacts to cult agenda cheerleading. The football mental state of mind restricts personal spiritual development. This restriction is part of the agenda!

Ron,

The quality of comments from a well intentioned audience would fit the typical bell curve. However your readership is stacked with ill intentioned distractors that have distorted the typical bell shaped curve.

The problem as stated by Mathew Maavak:
“Trolls come in many breeds: the insecure, the self-validating, the ideologue, and the hired gun. The latter are simply paid to sink the conversation — to smear the source, derail the thread, and leave nothing but wreckage in the comments box. Overall, they are akin to relentless parasites seeking one host after another. That is the troll MO: drive out the thoughtful, drain the oxygen and dumb down the public square. They don’t just kill conversations, they shrink attention spans and fertilize the soil for fake news to grow faster and fouler. “

You have stated your concern for this activity. Is there a compromise solution?

How about a trial run for one of your articles. Keep the comments dedicated to the article by requiring a block quote from the article and a response to that block quote. Replies to other commentators would not be allowed, however they can use the same block quote and provide their own reply. This should restrict much of the unnecessary chatter comments and personal insults. With a trial run you could analyze the quality of comments and decide if you want to implement such a format for all articles.

I, like almost everyone else, am guilty of straying from the article and would not mind a more restrictive format to improve the quality bell curve of comments.

Kevin

Do you think any of Judge Napolitano’s special guest will contribute to some 9/11 truth or will most if not all roll over their intellect and play possum? They can’t be that naive, can they? Are LJ, JS , and DM as good at playing intellectual possum as Noam Chomsky?

Is the Judge going to ignore the opportunity to speak out or will he also play possum?

Kevin, I don’t think you know how to play possum. How can they do that with a straight face?

JunkyardDog

I can see that you are not all bark and no bite! We are in agreement.

In 1993 there was good evidence that an FBI cell, under the management of Mossad, bombed the WTC, but that evidence was dismissed during the trial. The 9/11 event didn’t have a trial, but the 9/11 Commission blocked credible evidence that would have implicated Israel.

It is not a case of not enough credible evidence, but a case of organized crime in the criminal justice system. This should be the focus of Judge Napolitano’s questions to his special friends on his show, but that would put them in a very difficult and embarrassing position and they would then stop coming on his show.

Keep you eyes open for a lengthy post by me coming soon on one of the 9/11 articles.

Your good intentions are shared by many, but:

The problem as stated by Mathew Maavak:

“Trolls come in many breeds: the insecure, the self-validating, the ideologue, and the hired gun. The latter are simply paid to sink the conversation — to smear the source, derail the thread, and leave nothing but wreckage in the comments box. Overall, they are akin to relentless parasites seeking one host after another. That is the troll MO: drive out the thoughtful, drain the oxygen and dumb down the public square. They don’t just kill conversations, they shrink attention spans and fertilize the soil for fake news to grow faster and fouler. “

Insults to these people are like sugar to ants. It only encourages more to follow. No response is the best response if you suspect their intentions are not sincere.

Kevin, you passed the litmus test.

The litmus test for true patriotism, not just for America but for humanity, is the inquiry into the 9/11 event, the awakening and accepting the responsibility of educating others. For more than 18 years I have judged friend and foe on their willingness to objectively evaluate this subject.

As I view the Judge Napolitano site today, I see nothing scheduled to discuss 9/11. Sorry Judge, but you and your special friends are a big disappointment. If the Judge were a doctor and he misdiagnosed melanoma as a simple rash, would the Judge be a credible doctor. Then I ask, how can the Judge be a true patriot? What about his distinguished Professors, the Colonels, the X CIA boys?

The Judging Freedom gang of experts come across as gatekeepers. I don’t see debates on the Holocaust or the deep history of the Judaic agenda. Their strategy is comparable to the musket firing line. Form a defensive line, fire and then fall back and form another line of resistance.

From a gatekeeper’s point of view, their current position is a reasonable position to defend and make themselves look good. Sure it is a trade off but like Sachs says, we must try to save Israel, keep the Holocaust narrative alive and avoid the 9/11 reality, and that we really care about truth and justice!!!

Will the Judge join the human race or continue with a strategy that is becoming more obvious as each day goes by? I will reconsider if the Judge invites you or Ron or both to his show and ask the big questions that don’t get addressed by the others. Would you accept?

I might even give the Judge a hefty donation if I see you or Ron on his show!

From the Jewish Telegraph 2007

“Rudy Giuliani is emerging … as the clear favorite of the party’s top Jewish activists. The former New York City mayor significantly outpaced fellow GOP hopefuls John McCain and Mitt Romney in raising money from the 60 board members of the Republican Jewish Coalition… Giuliani also received the most applause last week at the RJC’s candidates forum. … Some GOP activists say Giuliani’s credentials as a two-time mayor of New York and staunch defender of Israel makes him an ideal choice … “I think a lot of New Yorkers like his tough stand on terrorism and his tough stance with regard to Iran getting nukes,” said Morrie Amitay, a former executive director of AIPAC and now a vice president at the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs.”

As I suspected, Tucker is a gatekeeper. He fails the litmus test.

“Israeli intelligence knew beforehand of the 9/11, American journalist Tucker Carlson has claimed. The topic, as well as other long-buried facts, will be explored in his upcoming documentary series on the attacks.

Carlson made the remarks on Tuesday when he appeared on Piers Morgan’s Uncensored News. The journalist pointed out the Israeli leadership never actually hid its attitude to the attack and believed they had a positive impact on the US-Israel ties.

“Of course I didn’t allege that the Jews did it. I don’t even know what that means. I think, in fact, saying things like that is a way to discredit real questions,” Carlson said.”

Since when did Tucker ask a real question?

The musket line has fallen back to another defensive position as the enemy, the fooled masses, progressively moves forward. Don’t fire till you see the white of their eyes and then fall back and reload are the orders from the command. How many are going to fall to the aim of sharp shooter Tucker?

FYI, most of my relatives and others I stay in touch with still don’t get it. When life was a “business as usual” worldview I had no idea that the people I knew were that stupid (not using one’s intelligence to get out of harm’s way). They all think they are patriots!!!!!

Giraldi,

Of the Judging Freedom gang of gatekeepers, you are my favorite. I like your truth telling efforts. You usually go further than the others, but………

Are you afraid to peal back the onion skin? Are you embarrassed that you may cry if you peal back the onion skin? The truth does hurt enough to make real men cry!

The first biggest American mistake was giving the money supply to the Judaic Cult. The second biggest mistake was the creation of the Judaic Cult’s own state. So do you naively believe that if Israel disappears then all of our problems are solved?

What about the misery and suffering, the deaths and wars before the creation of Israel where the evidence clearly points to the Judaic Cult. Let’s even go back to the hijacking of the Bible with the Old Testament. Surely if Israel disappears, only the timing of humanity’s enslavement has changed. The end result is the same.

Go ahead and peal back the onion and take a good cry. You will be a better man for it.

Alancik

I am considering a retirement from TUR. Just to let you know that your comments are appreciated and may be some of the most thought provoking words to ponder on the Unz Review.

I appreciate your delivery of three dimensional thinking and will come back to this tomorrow. Time for some rest. As Mark Twain said: History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.

Peel.

Kevin

You have a wide perspective, much wider than most commentators. One of the most bold but obscure Judaic Cult killings was the death of Congressman Larry McDonald.

Understanding the highly probable implications of this killing leads one to an understanding of the so called cold war. Do you know about this one? No cheating!!

Kevin

Concerning the assassination of Larry McDonald:

“I vaguely remember the 1983 “Russians shoot down Korean airliner” incident and the conspiracy theories swirling around it. What’s the best source? Maybe Ron should do an American Pravda piece on it?”

Without going into the strengths and weaknesses of personality profiles, this subject, like some other subjects that have been debated, falls outside of Ron’s exceptional strengths. A wide perspective needs to transcend one’s definition of “credible sources”.

Just as you have quickly evaluated a false narrative of the Kirk assassination based on a wide perspective of pattern analysis, I have also determined that the official narrative of the downing of Flight 007 is also false.

For starters, watch the video of Larry McDonald’s debate with Tom Braden on the show CROSSFIRE in 1983.

LARRY MCDONALD INTERVIEW ON CROSSFIRE SHORTLY BEFORE MYSTERIOUS DEATH IN PLANE CRASH

Video Link

Also consider his book TROTSKYISM AND TERROR by Larry P McDonald

As a Congressman he was too vocal and threatening to the Judaic Cult.

Look for clues about Tom Braden: Worked for the OSS and CIA, personal assistant to Allen Dulles, friend of Nelson Rockefeller, in partnership with Frank Mankiewicz (RFK press secretary at time of RFK assassination). These are excellent Cult credentials.

Larry McDonald’s excellent debate was an embarrassment to Tom Braden on public TV.

McDonald’s wife had enough common sense to question the official narrative:
“It makes you really wonder,” she says, “because as far as the Soviet Union was concerned, Larry was the loudest advocate against communism in Congress at the time. So how amazing, and hard to believe, that the No. 1 anticommunist in the United States was in the plane that was shot down. It’s a little hard to swallow that that was an accident.”

In the interview McDonald brings up the book that the Cult tried to silence, HOPE AND TRAGEDY by Carroll Quigley, which had over 70 pages of confidential information on the Cult’s plans to establish a One World Government.

Without going into detail, my investigations support a bigger picture, that after Stalin’s death, the Cult regained their control of the USSR, replacing national communism with international (Judaic Cult) communism. However, the communist threat was maintained as a strategic asset. See the following books:

MANUFACTURING CONSENT by Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky 1988

THE CULTURE OF TERRORISM by Noam Chomsky 1988

THE TERRORISM INDUSTRY: THE EXPERTS AND INSTITUTIONS THAT SHAPE OUR VIEW OF TERROR by Edward Herman and Gerry O’Sullivan 1989

THE UNIVERSITIES AND THE RULING CLASS: HOW WEALTH PUTS KNOWLEDGE IN ITS POCKET by David Horowitz 1969

I fully understand the limits of Chomsky’s credibility, but, minus the Jewish equation, he is on target.

From my own investigations, above the government level and in the shadows, Wall Street and Moscow were on the same page. All it took was a phone call from Tom Braden to his Moscow counterparts to shoot the plane down and then have the Cult’s information assets go into damage control and let the story quickly die out like a shooting star.

There is more evidence coming from a wide perspective of pattern analysis that supports this analysis. With a few common sense questions it can be suspected that the space race was a fabricated strategic asset and that the moon landings never happened (also backed up by a few common sense questions). But that’s another debate that is compartmentalized, a limitation of research handcuffed by “credible sources”.

I have great respect for you and Ron, but this is your type of story for investigation!

Alanchik,

Kirk had a personality profile. The better we understand that profile the better we understand his actions.

Before graduating from high school I had an aversion to reading. No books not even comic books. Upon graduation I had a very strong affinity for autobiographies and biographies of famous and important people. Were they different when they were young?

I seek to understand those who stand out, like Ron Unz. Why is he different? He is an
interesting character.

I am not famous but I did stand out, probably the only one who graduated from high school without reading a book. I didn’t do homework, only schoolwork. If I didn’t get it at school, too bad.

My circumstances after graduation were anything but normal. Nothing alarming, but I seemed to be on some kind of a journey.

I can relate to many of your statements. Even before reading all of David Icke’s books, my ideas, even at a young age were escaping the gravity of conventional wisdom.

This brings me to your personality type. Is there anything you noticed at a young age that made you feel different from those around you?

Very interesting Alanchik,

Yes. From a very young age I felt a kind of dissonance with what others accepted as “normal.”

I was born into a Catholic family, and at the age of about 5 years old, I rejected the superficial concepts that were preached to me. The concept of a Chosen People and the Jesus sacrifice made no sense. My parents enrolled me in a Christian high school, but it only took two years for them to tell my parents they did not want me back. I had a strong personality profile that challenged authority.

The very first books that I read after high school were autobiographies and biographies. What does that mean?

Personality traits have always been a curiosity for me. I had heard that Erroll Garner is a self taught jazz pianist who jumped on a piano at the age of 3 and never looked backed. Curious, I bought and listened to his Concert By The Sea and was stunned. What kind of personality traits can produce this?

The Cult understands how to use personality traits and has set up a large network to recruit potential candidates for their agenda. Was Kirk recruited because he had certain strong personality assets and what kind of personality traits are they looking for? Surely personality traits come in all flavours, some good and some evil.

KEVIN,

“But when that threatened to produce a mass awakening to the realities of who really killed the Kennedys, who really did 9/11, and who really rules the Western world, among other hot-button topics, our rulers decided to crack down.”

I found an interesting paper on ResearchGate dated August 2024 by Dr. Piers Robinson. The information presented is not current nor exciting for hardened information warriors like yourself.
The article is more like a weather vane, showing which way the wind is blowing.

He is aware of a much bigger problem and is encouraging the academics to get off of their ass and pay attention to world events with an open mind.

When a paper cites Kevin Barrett, it is worth the read!

Maybe a good idea to give this paper some exposure on the TUR.
You may be familiar with this paper which can be found on ResearchGate.

RESEARCHING 9/11 AND BEYOND: CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS BY DR. PIERS ROBINSON

This paper is not cutting edge revelations but rather a necessary stepping stone for those who are reluctant to jump in feet first.

In my 18+ years of becoming aware of the Judaic problem, the awakening stirred by Netanyahu is close to miraculous. Dr. Robinson’s weather vane paper is commendable and should be promoted.

Caitlin,

Good post. I am curious about the seriousness of your article which I find refreshingly provocative.
Have you escaped the gravity of traditional conspiratorial wisdom?

If you have, good for you because traditional conspiratorial wisdom is where the latest defensive lines are being set up.

You bring up a very astute point, that the cult reality is just too much for the majority to wrap their emotional minds around.

But I ask you, why leave out the most important ingredient that would make your article more reasonable and even more dramatic? Let’s add that the culprit behind the curtain is a non human entity, either bio, AI or a combination. This is where the yellow brick road takes you because the reality we have been taught is false.

Thanks Kevin for the reference to your podcasts with Piers Robinson.

I was impressed with his August 2024 paper because he is attempting to synthesize pieces of the puzzle into a unified agenda.

In December 2023 Piers seems to be open minded about the covert agenda of the Covid Pandemic. Although his paper is mostly about the 9/11 agenda, he brings in other events as part of the same main agenda. He is cautiously breaking down the compartmentalized boundaries that have been erected for damage control. As you know, the compartmentalizing of government agencies and within the agencies was a major strategy for damage control pre 9/11.

Concerning Covid, Piers sees the manufactured Covid Pandemic as part of a bigger agenda. As with any bigger picture agenda, there are opportunities for sub-agendas, but these sub-agendas prove useful in taking the bigger picture out of focus.

Piers’ take on Covid as of August 2024:

“For example, and as noted in the introduction, the partially on-going COVID-19 􏰕pandemic􏰖 has􏰏 all the hallmarks of being a structural deep event (forthcoming Robinson and Ryan, 2024). The initial declaration of a global public health emergency in the form of a pandemic was based upon a deceptive claim that a completely new and unusually dangerous pathogen existed. In reality, the misuse of a PCR test to identify individuals supposedly infected with the pathogen led to a hugely exaggerated count (Ryan, 2020), whilst rules for recording COVID-19 deaths led to huge overcounting. The official position now of PANDA, a group of statisticians and experts studying the COVID-19 event since 2020, is that there is no evidence of a novel and dangerous virus emerging in late 2019/early 2020. Instead, fraudulent testing protocols and misattribution of iatrogenic harms to COVID-19 created a false impression of a dangerous pandemic (PANDA, 2024).”

If Piers is correct, then the danger of the agenda is coming directly to us.

Could it be that the blatant Israeli atrocities are not by a rogue Israeli government but by a planned distraction for the implementation of a bigger agenda? Is Piers coming to the conclusion that putting attention on sub agenda’s has always worked and the masses are repeatedly fooled?

Can you get him on your show again for an update? Keep in mind that what he says is probably toned down from what he thinks. You are a skillful debater and may be able to pry loose some of his more concrete thoughts.

Ron,

But if these were the only photos available and they showed him without any weapon, why was the FBI so convinced that he was the killer?

Good question. For those who still believe that the FBI is a credible agency, I provide the following:

In the decade leading up to the 9/11 event, the filling of organizational choke points with Judaic Cult operatives was essential for damage control and containment of information for their strategy of false flag terrorism within the United States. This was especially true for the FBI.

In 1993, Neil Herman in the FBI is suspected of managing a covert FBI unit to bomb the WTC. The FBI’s participation in the bombing was revealed by a tape recording of conversations between the FBI and a suspected Mossad Egyptian agent who decided to protect himself in the ensuing trial.
Sometime after the bombing, Neil Herman left the FBI to go work for the ADL.

All

The timing of statements and the shooting are relevant to the Replies to Fin of a cobra’s astute observation.

Tucker made comments on Tuesday the 9th which I called out as gatekeeper talk on the 11th. Kirk was shot on the 10th. Tucker was already backpedaling before the shooting.

Here is part of my post on the 11th:

As I suspected, Tucker is a gatekeeper. He fails the litmus test.

“Israeli intelligence knew beforehand of the 9/11, American journalist Tucker Carlson has claimed. The topic, as well as other long-buried facts, will be explored in his upcoming documentary series on the attacks.
Carlson made the remarks on Tuesday when he appeared on Piers Morgan’s Uncensored News. The journalist pointed out the Israeli leadership never actually hid its attitude to the attack and believed they had a positive impact on the US-Israel ties.
“Of course I didn’t allege that the Jews did it. I don’t even know what that means. I think, in fact, saying things like that is a way to discredit real questions,” Carlson said.”

Saggy

“I am saying the NIST report is correct.”

Your statement indicates to me that, in your mind, you are an expert in all of the very complex equations and the validity of the numerous inputs and outputs of those equations. I know structural engineers who have studied this report and can’t make the same claim.

For the less technically skilled, there are many non technical reasons for not trusting the NIST. I have learned from investigating other agencies that the way to control an agency’s investigation is by contracting out important parts of the investigation to selected private companies to skew the conclusion in a desired direction. This is also a very effective way to compartmentalize information for damage control. Compartmentalization of the numerous agencies, both between and within, was the main damage control strategy used before and after the 9/11 event. See my Sibel Edmonds post # 66

The NIST investigation was heavily compartmentalized into private contractors, so your statement about trusting NIST is inaccurate. I recommend that you investigate the private firms that had a contract with NIST and give TUR a full report.

From the NIST site:

“External Experts and Contractors that Supported the WTC Investigation.
NIST augmented its in-house technical staff with experts from outside NIST who could contribute significantly to the goals and objectives of the WTC investigation. In most cases, this was accomplished through contracts that included specific deliverables required for successful completion of the investigation. Awarding contracts on technical tasks allowed NIST access to capabilities and expertise available in the private sector and allowed efficient use of in-house staff resources on the WTC investigation. In addition, an administrative services contract was awarded to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) in August 2002 to support the two-year investigation.”

As an example, another agency using the same strategy of out sourcing to private contractors:

The UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTIST (5,500 EPA scientist) did an in house investigation of the problems they were having with outside interference and the EPA’s contracting out studies was high on their list. See their report INTERFERENCE AT THE EPA.

About six months ago Larry Johnson claimed that the 9/11 tragedy was the result of business as usual incompetence of the agencies that were supposed to protect the US from terrorism. This is inconsistent with his most recent JFK revelation.

Colonel Douglas MacGregor said within the last six months that Israel is our friend and then later says they control this country. Another inconsistency.

I understand their difficulty, their disgust and their frustrations. It is a minefield out there and they don’t know which foot to put forward.

I had a discussion with Ed Haslam about his book. He was very aware that he could be killed for writing his book. John DeCamp was also aware of the death threat. I. B Pranatis was warned that he would be killed if he wrote his book, and he did write it and was killed during the Bolshevik Revolution.

Nothing new, but the real tragedy has been the stupidity of the people. The big question: Are enough people waking up to make a difference?

ENR

“The people are not stupid. They are traumatized.”

Your statement is worth the time to analyze.

If a young child burns himself while playing with matches, is he considered STUPID?

If the parents gave the child matches to play with, would that be considered STUPID?

If Ron Unz burned his house down while playing with matches, would that be considered STUPID?

Do these questions represent a common usage of the word STUPID?

Note that the more intelligent a person is, the more applicable is the word STUPID.

Do highly intelligent people say and do stupid things? Some of the most STUPID things are said by PhDs. Saggy is a good example.

Ron and others are sharing thoughts on some of the Judging Freedom Gang.
Statements made by the Gang members can be categorized by the following:

A truly STUPID statement
A statement of self interest, as for protection.
A sincere statement for the enlightenment of others
A Gatekeeper’s statement

It is reasonable to suspect that the Gang members are making a mixture of these statements, especially when statements are inconsistent or contradictory. The same could be said for the TUR community.

With all of these statements being made, the most elusive are the STUPIDITY statements because Stupidity can’t see itself, and that applies to everyone. That is the danger of Stupidity!

Ron

It would be helpful to understand the 9/11 event within an historical overview of the evolution of the Judaic Cult’s agenda. ( I use the term Judaic Cult because most “Jews” don’t have a clue since they are being manipulated like non Jews.) The 9/11 attack, as a dramatic false flag event for public viewing, surely would have depth of historical continuity for such a monumental bold plan! It is reasonable to suspect that Israel is just an instrument of a more powerful and hidden agenda.

Think of the complexity of such an event, so much more complex than the killing of JFK. Think of the social infrastructure that had to be in place for the Cult to feel comfortable that they could get away with such a bold plan? This doesn’t happen overnight, not in a week and not even in a decade. The Cult’s infrastructure for a 9/11 false flag, controlling the flow of money, ideas and information, is so massive that most people do not have the will or the emotional fortitude to wrap their minds around this event.

The point I am making is that only the very few who understood the hidden history of the big picture would be able to predict such a false flag event, but for the masses who naively bought into the official history which does not explain the motivations and cohesiveness of a monolithic agenda, such an event would be beyond their imagination.

As I watched the first WTC tower turn to dust in real time on that tragic day, I was the only one at work who understood that the collapse was controlled demolition. Even structural engineers could not see what they were trained to understand. The emotions can be blinding. However, I was confused because I had no understanding of real history.

How far back in history can we follow a path of the Cult laying down the necessary social infrastructure? For brevity, I provide a brief perspective from my pre 9/11 investigation of this historical path starting around 1908.

Phase I ( pre WWI ) : The Cult’s big question – What is the most effective way to socially engineer a people into enslavement? Large scale war is determined to be the most effective catalyst to induce social change. Their mission is to keep creating large scale wars until they have achieved the desired control of the people. In Phase I their desire to start a large scale war necessitates taking control of the US money supply and the State Department.

While everyone is watching the fireworks in the Mid East, the US will pull a fast one in Venezuela.

Any bets on the price of gold, silver and oil?

Rurik

Your comment is a good overview of the importance of understanding 9/11. Combine your comment with my comment #75, and the 9/11 event has its place in the bigger picture. The Gatekeepers will try to contain 9/11 as a separate incident. Is this what Tucker is doing?

Odd Rabbit

I am betting that you are a natural for going deep into the rabbit hole.

I looked at some of your previous comments and saw that you are following Alanchik. Alanchik goes deep and has a keen awareness.

The next step after understanding the level of my comment #75 is the path that Alanchik is on. I do not debate the details with Alanchik because he is into an area of reasonable speculation.

From my point of view, the programing was done to humanity in general. Nothing really special about those who are raised with a Jewish identity. A non human entity will use whatever group it can to manipulate humanity to enslave itself. There seems to be good historical evidence for this.

Evolution vs metaphysics is a good debate, but:

Think of this analogy: evolution is to creation as classical physics is to quantum physics. One doesn’t exclude the other, but are just expressions of different levels.

I consider evolution as an expression of the higher level of metaphysical creation. The problem for most is getting levels confused.

You may have an interest in my evolution comment dated
March 17, 2023 at 2:29 pm GMT • 2.6 years ago • 700 Words 

I would hope that more commenters tune in to Alanchik’s comments.

Ron

As I’ve repeatedly said, something like 90-95% of all the “conspiracy theories” that I’ve come across seem to be incorrect or at least unsubstantiated, and the Moon Landing Hoax almost certainly falls into that category, tending to attract people of strong imaginations and weak minds.

You have also stated that you are 99% correct on the topics you discuss. Considering the wide variety of controversial subjects that you have discussed, and considering the potential for error of the human emotional brain, common sense suggest that your 99% estimate is emotionally based.

Is it possible that with a 99% confidence in yourself, you cannot see that some of your claims “seem to be incorrect or at least unsubstantiated”?

Ron,
Despite potential blind spots, you do exceptional work . However, you try to cover too much territory and there are subjects that you should not comment on. Your overconfidence gets you in trouble but you can’t see it.

A few comments back I presented my take on the word STUPIDITY. The big problem for all of us is that Stupidity can’t see itself. Overconfidence is the gateway for stupidity.

We are highly emotional beings. I agree with Edward Bernays that humans are fundamentally irrational. Doesn’t make any difference how high your IQ is or how many PhDs you have.

I have looked at many of your early articles and I see a reasonably well organized mind. But reasonably well organized minds are rarely consistent across the board of emotional topics. The topics you discuss are not exempt from emotional bias and I don’t think you are able to be consistent across the board of these topics. I don’t know anyone who is consistent.

Our genetics allows for a wide variety of genetic predispositions. I have seen too many times how someone is very rational in one topic and so irrational in another topic.

When you state that the other side of the debate has a weak mind, that tells me that you are close to being absolutely correct. Such statements are more than just standing by your assumptions and evidence.

Overall I have high respect for your work, but a little tweaking on picking your battles should be considered.