The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Hua Bin Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir ISteve Community James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Al X Griz Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred De Zayas Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Bailey Schwab Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Britannicus Brittany Smith Brooke C.D. Corax C.J. Miller Caitlin Johnstone Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar ChatGPT Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Harvin Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Courtney Alabama Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Skrbina David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Don Wassall Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens E. Geist Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Douglas Stephenson F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Key Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Ganainm Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gavin Newsom Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgia Hayduke Georgianne Nienaber Gerhard Grasruck Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Godfree Roberts Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Garros Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano H.G. Reza Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugh Perry Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras James W. Smith Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Janko Vukic Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jeremy Kuzmarov Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Mamer Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Atwill Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel Davis Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonas E. Alexis Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jorge Besada Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Correro Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth A. Carlson Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin DeAnna Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marc Sills Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Marcy Winograd Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Battaglioli Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Neville Hodgkinson Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Haenseler Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani R, Weiler Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Raymond Wolters Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Faussette Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Rob Crease Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Rose Pinochet RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Seaghan Breathnach Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Starr Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sybil Fares Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Wyatt Reed Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Austin Metcalf Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betar US Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Canary Mission Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Kushner Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlie Kirk Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colombia Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story Covert Action COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Crypto Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Cole David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Deportation Abyss Deportations Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Easter Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Enoch Powell Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve FEMA Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franklin Scandal Franz Boas Fraud Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom Freemasons French French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Flotilla GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Hell Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Huddled Masses Huey Newton Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Inbreeding Income Income Tax India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA Javier Milei JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Paul Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Miller Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Karmelo Anthony Kash Patel Kashmir Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry Ellison Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Maria Corina Machado Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Immigration Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monopoly Monotheism Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natanz Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Deal New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New Testament New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz Noam Chomsky Nobel Peace Prize Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition Nvidia NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise OFAC Oil Oil Industry OJ Simpson Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palantir Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Craig Roberts Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Petro Poroshenko Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Postindustrialism Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qasem Soleimani Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quiet Skies R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race-Ism Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rare Earths Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Red Sea Refugee Crisis Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romans Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds Roy Cohn RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satan Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Bessent Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Steven Witkoff Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tariffs Tatars Taxation Taxes Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Congress US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US State Department USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Civilization Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Race White Racialism White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Whitney Webb Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zohran Mamdani Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
Kevin Barrett
Comments
• My
Comments
1,944 Comments • 167,700 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    I moved out of Southern California in the summer of 1969. I was ten years old, and my parents were fleeing decadence and depravity in favor of the more wholesome Midwest. Before our move, a story had circulated about some local (Newport Beach) high schoolers who had “gone on an LSD trip” and gotten caught...
  • @Wally
    @Kevin Barrett

    You wrote:

    "Anyone who has studied the alternative literature on such events as Pearl Harbor, the Kennedy assassinations, and 9/11 knows that any overwhelmingly powerful mythic event that changes public perceptions and, in so doing, changes history, ought to be greeted with profound suspicion and subjected to the most painstaking scrutiny."

    Yet curiously you left out the most "powerful mythic event" of all time, the fake "holocaust".

    Why?

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Henry_Bowman U.C.

    I plead guilty. I am a Holocaust Overlooker.

    • Replies: @Wally
    @Kevin Barrett

    Do you believe in the "holocaust" narrative?

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Johnny Walker Read

  • @Wally
    @Kevin Barrett

    Do you believe in the "holocaust" narrative?

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Johnny Walker Read

    Let’s just say I am somewhere between Lipstadt and Unz on this question…closer to Unz, actually, but don’t tell the ADL ; – ) “Ron Unz on “Holocaust Denial”_ on Kevin Barrett’s Truth Jihad Radio” https://noliesradio.org/archives/152978

    • Replies: @Wally
    @Kevin Barrett

    So how many Jews do you think were supposedly "murdered"? How? Where?

    In the cited interview with Ron Unz you say nothing about that.

    Thanks for your time.

    www.codoh.com

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

  • @Dr. Robert Morgan
    Kevin Barrett: "CIA mind control maniac Louis Jolyon “Jolly” West and/or his acolytes brainwashed a psychopathic prisoner named Charles Manson, gave him a CIA get-out-of-jail-free card, ..."

    Maybe his get-out-of-jail-free card was expired or something. By the time the family was forming up, he had spent more than half his life in jails and other institutions. Then after brief two years on the outs, it was back in for life.

    Kevin Barrett: " ... set him up next door to Jolly’s safe house in the Haight-Ashbury hippie district of San Francisco, and taught him how to control human minds using drugs and hypnosis. "

    Some people are naturals, and Manson was one of them. Who taught Hitler? David Koresh? Jim Jones? Joseph Smith? Either you've got it or you don't. If the CIA really could make cult leaders at will, I have to think there'd be more of them. The fact that such people are rare is pretty good evidence they can't.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Good point. We may surmise that Jolly’s mind-control experiments in prisons (and in Haight-Ashbury and other field study settings) included an element of talent spotting.

  • @Wally
    @Kevin Barrett

    So how many Jews do you think were supposedly "murdered"? How? Where?

    In the cited interview with Ron Unz you say nothing about that.

    Thanks for your time.

    www.codoh.com

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    I don’t know. Several years ago I read a couple of books on the topic and hosted a debate between Thomas Dalton, author of Debating the Holocaust, and two supporters of the standard narrative, Roberto Muehlenkamp and Andrew Mathis. After comparing Dalton’s revisionist consensus for a Jewish death total of around 500,000 (from starvation, disease, exposure, some executions in the camps, mass shootings on the Eastern front, but no gas chambers) versus the standard narrative of six million total including millions killed in gas chambers, my impression is that the revisionists have a stronger case.

  • Is the mainstream mind-control machine starting to worry about Marianne Williamson? Boston Globe: “It’s a very good bet Williamson won’t win the nomination. But her growing prominence in the Democratic field gives her the biggest platform she’s ever had. And as we now know all too well, an entertaining fringe candidate can sometimes catch on.”...
  • @EliteCommInc.
    Uhhhhh . . .

    I will consider a liberal spiritual awakening when they cease support for murdering children in the womb. until then not on a bet.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @anon

    Point taken. “Liberal spiritual awakening” might be a three-word oxymoron.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    @Kevin Barrett

    Unfortunately for me,


    I am not a very complex thinker.


    Laugh.


    Appreciate you considering my position as extreme as it may be.

  • @Harris
    Re: A Course in Miracles, is actually a pretty decent restatement of what some Traditionalists call the Perennial Philosophy.

    Cerainly not, if by traditionalists you mean Guenon, Schuon, Burckhardt, Lings. For one, there is the necessity of an authentic revelation, hence orthodoxy.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Pretzel Yardstick, @anon

    It’s true that traditionalists wouldn’t make A Course in Miracles their bible, but would instead embrace orthodoxy based on authentic revelation. But generally traditionalists do believe there is a perennial philosophy that is expressed in different ways by different traditions, and they would probably agree that the gist of A Course in Miracles is somewhere in that ballpark.

    • Replies: @PPB
    @Kevin Barrett

    I'll admit that I've never read the Course in Miracles, so I'm not really qualified to comment directly. However, as much as I respect and admire the shared essence of the genuine religions (not talking about Scientology and the like here), I see their power and effectiveness as stemming primarily from the archetypes which each of them embodies and expresses uniquely. To the extent that a more heterodox or syncretic movement like a Course in Miracles is able to harness and transmit the power of those archetypes, the more effective it will be as a catalyzing spiritual force. It might even motivate some of its followers to imbibe a purer distillate, should they discover it and be so inclined. But maybe there's also a place in the drinking world for a good beer, to exploit a commonly-used Sufi metaphor.

    , @anon
    @Kevin Barrett

    > authentic revelation

    There is nothing more effective at creating atheists than claims of divine revelation.


    "Indeed I think that every Christian sect gives a great handle to Atheism by their general dogma that, without a revelation, there would not be sufficient proof of the being of a god."

    -Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, from Monticello, April 11, 1823
    Source: National Archives
     
    Revelation is a Hebrew confidence-man's game, and is not necessary to establish sufficient proof of the being of a god.
    , @Moi
    @Kevin Barrett

    Bro, I don't like the word "orthodox," at least when applied to Islam. I think the great and, God bless, still living scholar Dr. S.H. Nasr has a better word when he calls it traditional Islam.

    Replies: @Talha

    , @the grand wazoo
    @Kevin Barrett

    Kevin, I follow you at VT, and every Friday at FFWN (though the broadcasts seem externally tampered with I suffer through it). I think you danced around the core problem by not mentioning the relevant tenets from the Talmud that seem to correlate directly with the moral decay we are witnessing. I'm a Christian, my daughter married a Muslim, and the 3 of us live together comfortably. He tries to indoctrinate me and if allowed will talk for hours.
    It's my understanding that Jews believe in a different god, one that is both good and evil.
    They despise Christians and the Christian- Zionists they call useful idiots. Michael Hoffman in his book "Judaism Discovered" tells the hatred by Jews of Christians is so intense that they are taught to curse when passing a Christian church; "calling on their god (Hashem) to '"destroy this house of the proud". Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser in his book Judaism and the Christian Predicament wrote; "Judaism Is Not The Religion Of The Bible." pp59 and 159
    Knowledge of certain tractates of the Talmud, Kabbalah, and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion should be made public and easily available. One must know thy enemy. It really is time to declare openly who the real enemy is, and as crazy as it sounds we are fighting against men who for hundreds of generations have warred against God, and man. I think you know what is "the evil that infests us".

  • “Read Guy Debord if you want it explained to you why you are either a knave or a dupe if you continue to participate in ‘free and fair elections.’ Read this book if you want it explained to you why you are either a knave or a dupe if you tolerate any form of Islamophobia...
  • @Marcus
    How is it "the French 9/11" and not Bataclan and other deadlier incidents? I have no real sympathy for the Heebdos, they ridiculed Christianity on the regular and no one had the balls to do anything. Mohammedans may be dumbasses, but at least they don't buy the free speech BS.

    Replies: @anonymous, @anon, @Kevin Barrett, @DinoN

    We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo was published in March 2015, less than three months after the event, eight months before the 11/13/15 follow-up spectacle that included the Bataclan shooting. At the time the Charlie Hebdo event was called “the French 9/11” and it did have a comparable impact.

    My book on 11/13/15 (Bataclan, etc.) was also published less than three months after that event and is available on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0996143017

    The “instant book” strategy has two big advantages: It prevents fresh information from being “memory holed,” and it maximizes impact by addressing the subject while it’s still fresh.

    • Replies: @Marcus
    @Kevin Barrett

    Understandable, thanks

  • Is the mainstream mind-control machine starting to worry about Marianne Williamson? Boston Globe: “It’s a very good bet Williamson won’t win the nomination. But her growing prominence in the Democratic field gives her the biggest platform she’s ever had. And as we now know all too well, an entertaining fringe candidate can sometimes catch on.”...
  • @animalogic
    I agree with much of this article, however it becomes a little disoriented as it traverses territory which has been well walked for 1000's of years.
    I refer to the author's view that
    "if we embrace a secular materialist worldview" there's ultimately no reason to act morally -- indeed the author asserts, immorality will be the better, more likely decision. "Spiritually" is the only "sure" source for morality.
    This questionable. I'm willing to concede that materialism may tend to encourage immorality "more or less". But I will not countenance the view that immorality is a necessary or inevitable outcome of materialism.
    To name but two materialist worldviews & practices that are counter-evidence, there is Stoicism & Existentialism.
    The "Meditations" of Marcus Aurelius, a Stoic, is an intensely spiritual work.
    Existentialism, deals with human "being" & becoming. To exist is to embrace the choices inherent in human becoming. Those choices are inherently moral because they must be "true" (as best one can strive for their truth). There can be no rejection of objectivity, on the basis of some desire. Objective truth is merely contingent (ie science should never cease -- the creation - destruction of the "real").
    Interestingly, the author says the world absolutely needs a spiritual reawakening. I wouldn't disagree with that.
    However, I would be interested in the historical record here. How many spiritual awakenings have there been, & of what quality (ie to what degree did secular concerns motivate?) & quantity have they been. Most importantly how much time did these awakenings take?
    The "time" question is important, because that's one thing we really are running out of.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    I agree that immorality is not a universal and necessary outcome of materialism, at least not in individual cases. But in the aggregate? Ibn Khaldun (following the Qur’an) and Spengler view of the rise and fall of civilizations as the product of moral behavior driven by something spiritual, a kind of Platonic ideal that infuses the rising civilization, giving its members something to live and sacrifice for beyond their own immediate material interests. As that spiritual energy dissipates over the generations, materialism reasserts itself, morality declines, and civilization decays.

    As for existentialism: Speaking as a former existentialist, I lost faith in existentialist nihilism when I realized Sartre was right when he admitted that his absolutely free choice to speak and act “morally” (which entailed leftist politics) was arbitrary and capricious. An existentialist may arbitrarily choose to strive for the good of others, but may just as well strive for evil. Nothing in existentialism dictates that one choice is preferable to the other.

    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
    @Kevin Barrett

    With respect to existentialism and nihilism, you may find this interesting!

    http://www.koan.mu/gplus/bFxkK9a1rMp

    , @Iris
    @Kevin Barrett


    an ideal that infuses the rising civilization, giving its members something to live and sacrifice for beyond their own immediate material interests.
     
    Outstanding French philosopher Roger Garaudy called it "Transcendence".

    http://rogergaraudy.blogspot.com/2017/12/le-principe-de-transcendance-roger.html

    He was so exceptional that he used to regularly defeat Jean-Paul Sartre during public debates.

    https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-XN1gkdTMEz4/UNinv26xRLI/AAAAAAAAEZo/PiK1pbekHOM/s400/51055376_p.jpg

    Garaudy was ostracized and persecuted for being a Palestine supporter and a "revisionist".
    He is the greatest French philosopher of the 20th century; his writings on faith, religions and the meaning of life are unparalleled.

    Replies: @Bill Jones

  • First hour: J. Michael Springmann is an attorney and former State Department official whose bizarre experiences at his post in Saudi Arabia are recounted in Visas for al-Qaeda: CIA Handouts that Rocked the World. Along with former CIA officer Philip Giraldi, ex-Defense Department advisor Michael Maloof, and US Army anti-terror official Scott Bennett, Mike Springmann...
  • @Blue Corgi
    Where or when does one see the second hour (part of the headline here for the first hour)?

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Sorry about the confusion. I recently began posting each hour of Friday’s show separately at my Patreon page. Here is the second hour: https://www.patreon.com/posts/28940637

    For future reference, if you can’t find the second hour of Friday’s show here, please visit https://www.patreon.com/DrKevinBarrett .

    Note that all of my Patreon posts are open to non-subscribers 72 hours or less after posting.

  • University of Lethbridge Professor Emeritus Anthony Hall retired in October 2018 “because the university environment became too toxic for him to work in as a result of his having been falsely accused of antisemitism.” In this interview he reflects on the rise and fall of internet freedom of expression; the role of the Israeli lobby...
  • @Sean

    Very interesting! I hadn’t seen this. Presumably the people in charge of the current surveillance state agree that the more surveillance, the better. The real reason of course is that it increases their power. But they can claim “we need to do this to save humanity” to justify their power grab.

  • “Read Guy Debord if you want it explained to you why you are either a knave or a dupe if you continue to participate in ‘free and fair elections.’ Read this book if you want it explained to you why you are either a knave or a dupe if you tolerate any form of Islamophobia...
  • @dimples
    Kevin Barrett claim to be a controversial satirist is correct. Any body who becomes a Muslim voluntarily satirises himself.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Any body who claim to write English like this satirizes himself. (Please do your beloved white race a favor and remove yourself from the gene pool.)

  • I moved out of Southern California in the summer of 1969. I was ten years old, and my parents were fleeing decadence and depravity in favor of the more wholesome Midwest. Before our move, a story had circulated about some local (Newport Beach) high schoolers who had “gone on an LSD trip” and gotten caught...
  • @Beefcake the Mighty
    @Commentator Mike

    Well, the mentally retarded usually have a host of other problems that make life very difficult beyond lack of raw IQ or cognitive abilities. Sub-Saharan Africans or Nepalese aren’t retards, obviously, they’re capable of normal, functioning lives, but there’s not much reason to think (institutions aside) that they’re going to form modern, technologically advanced societies anytime soon, either.

    Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    Sub-Saharan Africans or Nepalese aren’t retards, obviously,

    Well, we agree on this. Frankly, it strikes me as absurd to say that half or more of the population of an entire country is mentally retarded.

    But the problem is that something has to give here. If you just google a string like “mental retardation iq definition” you quickly come up with a host of links that say mention a working definition of mental retardation being at a cutoff of 70 IQ typically.

    So, if you take what the IQ-ists are saying at face value, they are claiming that about 50% of the population of Black Africa suffers at least mild mental retardation! And, I mean, by their working definition of mental retardation! And the claim of Nepal at an average IQ of 60 is that the majority of the population is mentally retarded! Like, over 60% or something like that!

    Well, I can’t recall ever knowing anybody from Nepal, but early last year, I took a trip to a few sub-saharan African countries for the first time. I was in Senegal, Gambia, and Guinea-Bissau. Obviously, I didn’t go around administering IQ tests to anybody, but I had some interaction with various people, like conversations with taxi drivers and waiters and the rest of it, people whom one would not expect to be of exceptional intelligence in their country. Based on that experience, and whatever experiences I had with people from Africa before that trip, I simply cannot take seriously the idea that there is a cognitive gap between Europeans and Africans anywhere near as large as what these IQ-ist types are claiming.

    So, again, we’re not talking about whether the various human populations are all equal in all respects. There have been enough generations of separate evolution in different environments that there surely are differences. And that does include cognitive differences. I’m not claiming otherwise.

    The question is whether the true differences are anywhere near the magnitude they are claiming.

    So, you have a situation where people are making claims that, via casual observation, just seem absurd, that the average intelligence of Black Africans is so low that half of them qualify definitionally (and again, it’s just using these people’s definition!) as mentally retarded.

    As far as I can see, the reason that people (on this site and others) get so committed to this stuff is that they very much want to believe it. And that’s really the crux of it. This is the most basic trap to fall into, to say things because they cause you emotional satisfaction, rather than because you really believe them to be true!

    But, again, this problem that the writers I refer to as the “IQ-ists” are the most reliably unaware on any deep politics “red pill” issue. All these false flags and hoaxes that they run to propagandize the population, these people reliably fall for all of them. So what is one to conclude from this?

    • Agree: Kevin Barrett
  • Vladislav Krasnov writes: “Dear Kevin, “This is to invite you and your readers/listeners to a debate on Jewish-Gentile relations that my article ‘Ron Unz’s Strategy for the Alt-Media to Defeat the Mainstream Media Is Brilliant’ generated on the pages of Russia-Insider. “So far there are over 150 comments, and it is good as far as...
  • @Justvisiting
    How do we re-capture freedom of speech in this age of big tech censorship?

    The first amendment addresses government control of speech and not private actor censorship.

    The conservative/libertarian types don't want regulation of these high tech companies and claim it will hinder growth of new technology.

    There is a simple policy solution that could address the problem--ban any government contracts/grants/loans to companies that restrict speech on their platforms. That would include any media companies that did not allow open comments on their websites on all of their reporting. (The lawyers would have to include language to cover any affiliates and other companies owned by major stockholders.)

    In this age of big government and huge government contracts this would be a de facto extension of the first amendment to large private actors.

    (I am too cynical to take any policy prescriptions seriously--so it is out of courtesy to our host that I offer this one. :-) )

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Jayne Says

    “The first amendment addresses government control of speech and not private actor censorship.” Right. But monopolies are not legitimate private actors. The premise of antitrust law is that all monopolies must either be broken up or (if they are natural monopolies) seized and run as public utilities. Since social media fora are natural monopolies, they are de facto public utilities. Those running them as (bogus) private corporations are criminals, since they are violating antitrust law. And the Justice Department, which refuses to break them up or seize them, is also criminal. Given all of this, the criminal monopolists should be prosecuted for, among other things, violating the First Amendment, since the outfits they are running must be run as public utilities in conformity with the Constitution, the supreme law of the land.

    There is also a libertarian argument that all limited liability corporations are in fact public utilities: https://www.patreon.com/posts/sean-gabb-on-and-20767603

    • Agree: Tusk
    • Replies: @Fuerchtegott
    @Kevin Barrett

    This question is a bit unrelated, I'm rn listening to you and doctor Jones.
    Are you a ginger?

    , @Talha
    @Kevin Barrett

    Wow - excellent points!

    Peace.

    , @Rurik
    @Kevin Barrett


    The premise of antitrust law is that all monopolies must either be broken up or (if they are natural monopolies) seized and run as public utilities. Since social media fora are natural monopolies, they are de facto public utilities.
     
    imagine if Ma Bell used their monopoly to decide who they allowed to use their phone lines depending on if that person or group's politics coincided with the owners of Bell Telephone.

    'Sorry, your phone service has been cut off because we've been listening to your conversations, and we don't approve of your views.'

    And all the government regulators went along with it.

    That is effectively where we're at today.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  • First half hour: The viral article The Moon Landings: A Giant Hoax for Mankind? elicited more than 1,500 comments on Unz.com last April. The new updated version on Veterans Today is even better. It may be the best short introduction to the question of why so many people doubt that Americans really walked on the...
  • @Michael Korn
    @Michael Korn

    Another thing to consider from your perspective as a Muslim convert: going to the moon represents a conquest of the Divine Feminine (represented by the moon and manifested most clearly in Judaism and Islam) and an arrogant assertion of the primacy of the Masculine (represented by the Sun and manifested in Christianity).

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Can you recommend any sources on the Divine Feminine in Judaism?

    I agree that one of the distortions (tahrif) in Christianity is its repression of the Divine Feminine. The Trinity “father-son-spirit” is an all-male reproductive fantasy. The repressed element is obviously the mother. The return of the repressed takes the form of mariolotry.

    But doesn’t the Torah often portray Yawheh as an all-too-human, all-too-male patriarch (and a bit of a psychopath)?

    The Qur’an’s first two tangible descriptions of God (ar-rahman ar-rahim) roughly translate as “the All-Merciful, All-Compassionate” and derive from the root meaning “womb” yielding the connotation that God’s loving mercy towards creation is like a mother’s love for her children. Other “most beautiful names of God” highlight qualities associated with masculinity including glory, strength, etc.

    But Islam is very clear about God being neither male nor female. The Qur’an purifies discourse on God to remove the anthropomorphism that has crept into distorted versions of earlier scriptures. Worshipping an anthropomorphic god is just cosmic narcissism.

    • Replies: @Michael Korn
    @Kevin Barrett

    Hi Kevin. Good to hear from you. I replied directly to your email address. I am no longer participating in UNZ threads. I was run off of a different thread by some hyper capitalist Kch brother trolls.

    Even RU makes me suspicious. He is a Harvard graduate Tech Millionaire and certainly no friend of compassionate capitalism or socialism. Let's see if he would ever let you write an article about usury!

    If you feel the comments I emailed to you are useful you may repost them in this comment thread but I will not do it myself.

    Shalom Salaam

    , @Anon
    @Kevin Barrett

    Okay, but that doesn't sound like the Divine Feminine so much as the Divine Androgyne.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

  • Vladislav Krasnov writes: “Dear Kevin, “This is to invite you and your readers/listeners to a debate on Jewish-Gentile relations that my article ‘Ron Unz’s Strategy for the Alt-Media to Defeat the Mainstream Media Is Brilliant’ generated on the pages of Russia-Insider. “So far there are over 150 comments, and it is good as far as...
  • @Oscar Peterson
    Poor Krasnov.

    He wrote a short article at Russian Insider proposing an alliance of non-Jews and "good" Jews which was savaged by the commenters.

    Then he dropped a note here lamenting that the response at Russia Insider was almost uniformly anti-Jewish. And what response does he get here? Almost exactly the same as he got at RI.

    No doubt readers of both Russia Insider and Unz Review feel gratitude to Ron Unz for the truth-platform he has provided. But I think very few believe that there are enough Ron Unz's within American Jewry to constitute anything like a critical mass worth allying with. Unz is a renegade Jew and does not represent much of anything beyond himself. Phil Weiss at Mondoweiss is similar. One can respect the few instances of renegade Jews who are willing to forsake the Jewish power networks, but a few renegades do not create the critical mass of Jews willing to diverge from the Judeo-supremacist ethos that Krasnov is fantasizing about.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @bjondo, @Alden

    Actually Jews are overrepresented among renegade free thinkers, just as they are in so many other fields.

    The problem is the power of organized tribal Jewry, representing a tiny fraction of the Jewish population, not Jewish individuals. The vast majority of individual Jews are just ordinary folks, who could and should wake up, in ever greater numbers, to the necessity of putting the criminal overlords out of business.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Kevin Barrett

    You're hopelessly naive. I've lost count of the Jewish organisations whose job mostly consists of gagging, deceiving, corrupting, enslaving, bombing, infiltrating or genociding virtually every goyim subgroup you could imagine. Jewish organisations on the other side of that field are nonexistent or barely symbolic.

    Also, the vast majority of individual Jews are more than happy to continue parasitically gorging themselves on their hosts through hyper-nepotism and corruption. They might not be personally plotting the goyim demise in smoke-filled rooms but they do know which side their bread is buttered on.

    , @Oscar Peterson
    @Kevin Barrett


    "The problem is the power of organized tribal Jewry, representing a tiny fraction of the Jewish population, not Jewish individuals."
     
    Polls show over 3/4 of Jews identify with the Judeo-supremacist state of Israel. Orthodox Jews flow out of NYC and conspire to take control of up-state NY towns for their own colonies. Jews make up 1.5% of the US population and are clustered around NYC and a few other cities on the coasts, and you are saying that an imagined silent majority of this minority are just good folks who want to sit under their olive trees?

    Jewish collective action has historically been central to their group functioning and identity--fund raising for Israel, support for other populations of transnational Jews in other countries and for in-group organizations. There is an infinity of Jewish-identity sites on the web. So a tiny minority of a tiny minority has somehow managed to enslave the US to Israeli goals and banish Christianity from the public sphere?

    Jews were resented by the Greeks in the Hellenistic world 2000 years ago, because the Romans allowed them to pay their allotted taxes to support the Temple in Jerusalem instead of the Greek cities in which they mostly lived. The entire Jewish population of the Pale was dedicated to living off the immiserated goy peasantry in collusion with the ravenous Polish aristocracy. But somewhere along the way, all this changed and now they're just good folks?

    What evidence has convinced you of this?
  • @Republic
    KEVIN BARRETT:

    This is slightly off topic, but could you tell me why the complete you tube channel of Dr E Michael Jones has been purged suddenly?

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    I would guess the ADL was responsible. They are in total panic mode, going all out to destroy the free internet before it destroys their crime network.

    • Agree: Republic
  • @Kevin Barrett
    @Justvisiting

    "The first amendment addresses government control of speech and not private actor censorship." Right. But monopolies are not legitimate private actors. The premise of antitrust law is that all monopolies must either be broken up or (if they are natural monopolies) seized and run as public utilities. Since social media fora are natural monopolies, they are de facto public utilities. Those running them as (bogus) private corporations are criminals, since they are violating antitrust law. And the Justice Department, which refuses to break them up or seize them, is also criminal. Given all of this, the criminal monopolists should be prosecuted for, among other things, violating the First Amendment, since the outfits they are running must be run as public utilities in conformity with the Constitution, the supreme law of the land.

    There is also a libertarian argument that all limited liability corporations are in fact public utilities: https://www.patreon.com/posts/sean-gabb-on-and-20767603

    Replies: @Fuerchtegott, @Talha, @Rurik

    The premise of antitrust law is that all monopolies must either be broken up or (if they are natural monopolies) seized and run as public utilities. Since social media fora are natural monopolies, they are de facto public utilities.

    imagine if Ma Bell used their monopoly to decide who they allowed to use their phone lines depending on if that person or group’s politics coincided with the owners of Bell Telephone.

    ‘Sorry, your phone service has been cut off because we’ve been listening to your conversations, and we don’t approve of your views.’

    And all the government regulators went along with it.

    That is effectively where we’re at today.

    • Agree: Ron Unz, Talha, Kevin Barrett
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Rurik

    Perfect analogy. The biggest difference is that it would have caused a revolution in those times.

    It's amazing how docile we've become. We're living in a clown world where obvious corruption, naked criminality and open treason are seemingly invisible and out of reach of "our" governments and too few people are ready to act.

    I blame it on xenoestrogens and the accompanying 50% testosterone loss for Western men in the past 50 years.

    Replies: @Rurik

  • With its eschatological Bible, the West is constantly haunted by its death and hypothetical rebirth. Its apocalyptic imagination is unmatched. Christianity promises a frightful ending, as in, “Then the angel took the censer, filled it with fire from the altar, and hurled it on the earth; and there came peals of thunder, rumblings, flashes of...
  • @anon
    @Dumbo

    Look at the statistics. Europe (EU27) is only 7% atheist. Not even double digit, much less half like you're trying to exaggerate.

    https://i.imgur.com/JQmfh4q.jpg

    And the country with the highest rate of atheism, the Czech Republic, led by a probable atheist, says this:


    Migrants to Europe 'need to go home', says Czech prime minister
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/25/europe-migrants-need-to-go-home-says-czech-prime-minister
     
    Your hypothesis that Christianity is necessary to repel immigration has been weighed in the balance and found wanting. Fact is, Christianity invites immigration, because White Christians consider Black Christians their "brother," but do not consider White non-believers as their brother.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Kevin Barrett, @Dumbo

    The cited statistics are misleading. The real religion of European and American elites, and the official religion of the dominant institutions of the West, is secular humanist progressivist materialism. For a critique, see: https://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/12/28/arrf/

    Blaming Christianity for Europe’s problems is absurd. Virtually nobody in Europe goes to church, thinks about God, follows religious precepts, or is the slightest bit traditionally religious. On the contrary, the most basic problem (demographic collapse) stems from the collapse of religion. Pat Buchanan in The Death of the West correctly observes that the decline of traditional religion tracks very closely with declining birth rates. Why? Because having children is an act of faith. It requires sacrificing one’s ego in service to the Other. That is what real, traditional, spiritual religion teaches. (God is the ultimate Other.) Creating a stable, reasonably happy family capable of raising children who themselves will want to do the same thing requires a massive sacrifice of one’s own opportunities for pleasure and freedom. Sensible materialist atheists have no good reason to make such sacrifices.

    “Spiritualized altruism” fostered by religion is what holds complex societies together. The West is dying precisely because it abandoned traditional religion. Go back and read your Buchanan.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Kevin Barrett

    The West's secular humanism is the retention Christian Creationism values minus the more embarrassing of the magical miracles. I've already provided in comment #228 several references of recognized scholars who acknowledge such; my favorite being John Gray, who states that liberal humanist values are merely a “hollowed-out version of a theistic myth.”

    Don't feel too bad if John Gray's statement troubles you, it makes the secular humanists and atheists go crazy too. The West's believers and non-believers are much more alike that what they'll admit; both remain philosophically creationist instead of accepting the harsh facts of evolutionary science.

    Replies: @Talha

    , @anon
    @Kevin Barrett

    > (demographic collapse) stems from the collapse of religion

    Let's put your opinion next to some facts: China is officially atheist, half the population convinced atheists, and has a population growth of 0.6%. In contrast, Russia is half Christian, and has a population growth of 0.1%, which is a fraction of the population growth under the atheistic Soviet government. Using your simplistic line of reasoning, one may conclude that in Russia, demographic collapse stems from the collapse of Soviet atheism.

    Also, South Korea's declining birth rate is accompanied by a huge increase in Christianity.

    1960 2% Christian, Birth Rate 6.10/woman
    2016 30% Christian, Birth Rate 1.17/woman

    Demographic collapse is more complex and includes more factors than you're admitting.

    Replies: @Johnny K. Arate

    , @anon
    @Kevin Barrett

    > Creating a stable, reasonably happy family...

    ...is exactly what Rabbi Jewsus and the Jew Paul taught against. A sampling of what they taught. Go read your Bible.


    • “Woe unto them that are with child.” (Matthew 24:19, Mark 13:17, Luke 21:23)
    • “Blessed are the childless women.” (Luke 23:29)
    • "It is better not to marry!" (Matthew 19:10)
    • "Choose to live like eunuchs." (Matthew 19:12)
    • "Hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters." (Luke 14:26)
    • "Forsake houses...wife, children." (Matthew 19:29)
    • "Neither marry nor be given in marriage." (Matthew 22:30)
    • “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” (1 Corinthians 7:1)
    • "Stay unmarried." (1 Corinthians 7:8)
     
    Europe adapted this blatantly anti-family apocalyptic religion most successfully during an era when it was a capital crime to print, own, or even read a Jewish-authored Bible. Once it got printed, everybody start believing what was inside the Bible, instead of following the European traditions that strictly limited the malevolent influence of the Jewish-authored Bible.

    Europe is now more like Jesus (and Paul) than in was in any other time in history, and may well commit a "self-righteous suicide," just like Jesus did. Christian to Death, indeed!

    Replies: @Nalca

    , @SeekerofthePresence
    @Kevin Barrett

    Brilliant and accurate statement.

    Arnold Toynbee supports the contention that '“Spiritualized altruism” fostered by religion' is the glue that binds together successful civilizations. This is the powerful life force that enables them to overcome shocks to their society and their adversaries. Russia is now reviving because they have reclaimed God and are returning to Church. Recent Pentagon reports reflect fear that Russia has resurrected both the will and the means to defend her motherland and her Church.

    Civilizations that fail have turned their backs on God. They have lost their "mojo." Hence the present decay in 'Murka and Europe. They are like "the rich in his humiliation, because as a flower of the field he will pass away." James 1:10 NKJV

    Replies: @anon, @anon, @Bliss

  • Omar Ramahi, a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Waterloo, is the author of Muslims’ Greatest Challenge: Choosing Between Tradition and Islam. The book “challenges the use of Hadith as a source of legislation by presenting arguments directly from the Mushaf (the Qur’an). It takes an unconventional approach toward the Mushaf...
  • @polistra
    In the middle of this podcast (which is highly informative and interesting!) you mention the "first hour" was an interview with poet Charles Upton. Sounds like it would be equally interesting, but it's not showing up or not uploaded.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    The Upton interview is posted at https://www.patreon.com/posts/29392718 and should soon be here at Unz.com as well.

  • A few days ago Vanity Fair, the same outlet that once attempted to block the exposé of monster pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, published an article by Venessa Grigoriadis that provides some details of Epstein’s friend and alleged ‘co-conspirator’ Ghislaine Maxwell. Multiple victims claim that Maxwell often brought girls to Epstein and that she was an active...
  • @Jake
    @Gilad Atzmon

    Israel Shamir's assessment seems to be that those negative issues that define Jewish culture can 'be fixed' only by Jews sincerely, genuinely, converting to historic Christianity and embracing whatever local national/ethnic cultures they choose to live in.

    Replies: @Skeptikal, @Gilad Atzmon, @Kevin Barrett

    Conversion to Islam, the ultimate universal monotheism, also fixes these issues. Muhammad Asad, né Leopold Weiss, became a great ethical universalist.

    • Replies: @Fuerchtegott
    @Kevin Barrett

    Are you by any chance a ginger?

  • Christopher Fulton‘s The Inheritance: Poisoned Fruit of JFK’s Assassination recounts how, after the death of JFK’s personal secretary Evelyn Lincoln in 1995, JFK assassination evidence collected by Robert Kennedy and passed to Evelyn Lincoln for safekeeping fell into his hands…upending his understanding of history, and his life. Did Fulton serve eight years in federal prison...
  • @restless94110

    Listen to Christopher Fulton and find out.
     
    Listen where? Listen how?

    What am I missing here? There's no link to anything, but a book on Amazon and an old article on Unz.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    You’re missing the audio player under the headline.

    • Replies: @restless94110
    @Kevin Barrett

    For some unknown reason I see it now. Thanks

  • @give me a break
    JFK Jr an "all but annointed future president."


    What an exaggeration.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    More like an understatement.

    • Agree: Iris
  • First half hour: The viral article The Moon Landings: A Giant Hoax for Mankind? elicited more than 1,500 comments on Unz.com last April. The new updated version on Veterans Today is even better. It may be the best short introduction to the question of why so many people doubt that Americans really walked on the...
  • @Anon
    @Kevin Barrett

    Okay, but that doesn't sound like the Divine Feminine so much as the Divine Androgyne.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Islam, like Christian apophatic theology, holds that God is ineffable. So when we try to wrap our minds and hearts around what the Creator and Sustainer of all existence could possibly be, the most obvious approach is to say what God is not. When we try to conceive of God by using concepts that could also be applied to humans, such as majesty, glory, mercy, compassion, and so on, we do so with the proviso that God is not really “like” a human being (or anything else in creation).

    Islam holds fairly rigorously to this approach. It rejects anthropomorphic ideas of God, including any notion that God could really be “like” man or woman. Whereas Christianity, despite the best efforts of some of its mystics and apophatic theologians, often slips into imagining God as an old man with a beard…or (among people reacting against this imbalance) as the Virgin Mary.

    That said, it is interesting that the first and most oft-remarked tangible characteristics of God in Islam, mercy and compassion, derive from the word for “womb” and connote a mother’s love for her children.

  • US Army Major General Dana Pittard and US Air Force Master Sergeant Wes Bryant are co-authors of the brand-new military memoir Hunting the Caliphate: America’s War on ISIS and the Dawn of the Strike Cell. The Pentagon and CIA spent 15 months screening the book, so unsurprisingly it generally follows official narratives. But it does...
  • @EliteCommInc.
    Note:

    My comments are those of someone who opposed both the invasion of Iraq, and Afghanistan (we could have effectively dealt with those accused of 9/11 with strategies less than a costly and unwise invasion),


    That was my position in 2001, 2002, 2003 and today.

    Buy if we were going to invade, we should done so with enough force to control the country. That was my position in 2001, 2002, 2003 and today.

    And contrary to the comments of Fox News, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, CBN, PBS, CNBC and host of supposed experts military and government representatives, and even more of the enlightened:
    liberal and conservative advocates, christians, nonchristians, blacks, browns, whites, yellows,legal and (illegal immigrant) flag waving theives of US treasure, male and female and most of the public at large who's bizarre justifications, policy prescriptions and name calling advocates for invasions,

    I am not unpatriotic, a "practioner of same sex behavior", a coward, nor much of any of the names used in reference to my me and those like me who opposed the matter outright -- without the name calling and other tactics and lies used to destroy so many careers and lives, where I was then is exactly where I am today.

    And even it meant being being assaulted and lied about all over again --- my position would be the same. And what's more,

    the aftermath of those invasions have exonerated my opposition based on the events.

    And the same cadre' expects me to bow down in himage to them because they still have a platform from which to speak -----


    uhhhhhhm not on a bet. It was unethical and strategically unwise then it remains so to this day.


    I hate the destitution ---- but even in the shame of my poverty --- my position remains the same and I am delighted to know despite all the filth visited on my life and that of others our integrity was not for sale that day.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Counterinsurgency

    The problem wasn’t the tactics (invade Iraq with x or xx number of troops) but the strategy dictating any such invasion in the first place. The US should be allied with the whole Muslim East against the real long term strategic threats to US interests: China, Russia, and eventually India.

    The Muslim East is weak, and weakness invites aggression and theft of resources. That’s why the Zionists can steal Palestine, Russia can steal Islamic Central Asia, India can steal Kashmir, China can steal East Turkestan, Buddhist fanatics can commit genocide in Myanmar, Serbs in Bosnia, etc. As Huntington said, Islam has bloody borders. That’s because Islam is weak, and outsiders are attacking and invading Islamic lands to loot their resources.

    The US, which is trying to dominate or at least police the world from North America, must follow the grand strategy of balancing competing powers in Eurasia. That means helping the weaker powers (in this case Islamic countries) against stronger powers.

    Instead, the Zionists have tricked us into fighting their wars against their neighbors and wasting trillions of dollars to try to weaken and destroy of the Islamic world—when our own interests dictate that we should be strengthening and defending it in order to balance the other great powers and promote peace and stability.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    @Kevin Barrett

    To your first point, I think we agree. The invasion(s) were wholly a mistake.

    However, I think we disagree on the strategic issues:

    if the choice was to invade then we needed a full war posture and prosecution to destroy and then control the country entirely according to our will and our demands, Shia, Sunni, Catholic, Jew, Atheist - - it's our way or the highways - period.

    Further,

    If I understand you correctly, in your view, we need a grand middle east alliance to deal with the rising threats from India, China and Russia. That's a tall order given the dynamics in the region made worse by our current military choices.


    Before considering the long term grand strategies, which for the moment are impossible to configure, we will have to wade through this mess we have made and begin a campaign of convincing Israel, Iran, Syria, Iraq, Saudia Arabia, Yemen, Jordan, Qatar, Egypt, Dubai, etc. that they should let bygones be bygones and join forces with the NATO and the US in the struggle for civilization survival -----

    Now in one sense that is an intriguing idea, save this, its loaded with interventionists pitfalls and nightmares that would further drain the US to the benefit of the opponents you want to challenge. While keeping that in mind, and I am not opposed to empire on its face,

    I would like to take one step at a time and clean up the current mess of a policy first.

    Replies: @romar, @RadicalCenter

    , @RadicalCenter
    @Kevin Barrett

    You’re right about the need to get together to deter, counterbalance, and compete effectively with China, and about the potential threat posed by India.

    The USA should be partnering with Russia to do so.

  • As the 18th anniversary of 9/11 approached, the arrest and alleged suicide of Jeffrey Epstein made headlines—and raised questions about the credibility of official narratives. As Eric Rasmusen writes: “Everybody, it seems, in New York society knew by 2000 that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were corrupting teenage girls, but the press wouldn’t cover it.”...
  • @NoseytheDuke
    Correct me if I am wrong but I thought Lucky Larry only leased the WTC buildings rather than actually purchased them. I think I have read that his investment was in the region of 150 mill for which he has recouped a whopping 4 bill.

    Replies: @Macon Richardson, @Kevin Barrett, @Paw

    It was a 100 year lease, which is better described by the word purchase.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Kevin Barrett

    Be kind. Facts can upset him. He's relied on his alcohol damaged memory and its let him down again.

    Replies: @NoseytheDuke

    , @NoseytheDuke
    @Kevin Barrett

    Wrong. While a lease of 100 years is admittedly very long it is a common period with real estate property and certainly is still very much a lease. A purchase would likely involve a much larger down-payment as anyone who has ever leased a building or even a motor vehicle can attest.

    A larger down payment on the WTC buildings in the case of a purchase would have resulted in the scam generating far less profit for Lucky Larry and obviously wasn't seen as necessary, and there may have been greater legal obligations as an owner rather than simply as a lease holder.

    Why not just use the accurate word instead an inaccurate word shrouded by, " better described by"?

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

  • @Fozzy Bear
    “Trump had been credibly accused in a lawsuit of joining Epstein in the brutal rape of a 13-year-old, to whom Trump then allegedly issued death threats.)”
    The “Katie Johnson” case collapsed in 2016 when it was revealed that “she” was in fact a middle-aged man, a stringer for the Jerry Springer show. Just another Gloria Allred fraud.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Not true. A respectable civil rights attorney, Lisa Bloom, handled Katie Johnson’s case. Shortly before the scheduled press conference at which Johnson was to appear publicly, she received multiple death threats: “Bloom said that her firm’s website was hacked, that Anonymous had claimed responsibility, and that death threats and a bomb threat came in afterwards.” https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation Johnson folded because she was terrified (and perhaps paid off).

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Kevin Barrett

    You wouldn't like to be thought naive would you? Suppose that plaintiff Johnson was a real actually existing person of the female persuasion and supposing that, between her and her second string celebrity counsel, they concluded they weren't even going to get hush money out of Trump but, because he could be or was already elected to be President, they could be in danger from the FBI and Justice Department what would their crisis manager/PR flack advise. Death threats! Yep, that should be enough.

    , @Junior
    @Kevin Barrett


    A respectable civil rights attorney, Lisa Bloom, handled Katie Johnson’s case.
     
    “Respectable”?
    BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
    You do realize that Lisa Bloom is the daughter of Glora Allred and defender of Harvey Weinstein do you not?

    You people are so desperate to try to link Trump to Epstein it’s pathetic.

    I suggest you go back to your gatekeeping nonsense of trying to discredit the 9/11 Truth Movement by spreading misinformation about nukes in the towers.

    Replies: @Patrikios Stetsonis

    , @follyofwar
    @Kevin Barrett

    Adding to Junior's comment, I quit reading after you wrote of "credible accusations" of Mr. Trump being involved "in the brutal rape of a 13 year old." And feminist shakedown artist Lisa Bloom, daughter of the even more infamous feminist shakedown artist G. Allred, is your "credible source?" Bloom has about as much credibility as the sicko democrat women who tried to derail Judge Kavanaugh.

    Regardless of how much one might hate Trump (and I'm no Trump supporter) levelling such unfounded accusations is journalistic malfeasance. Did we elect the Devil Incarnate? Mr. Barrett, I'm done reading you.

    , @Mark Hunter
    @Kevin Barrett

    The Vox article Barrett references does not support his claim. In fact it gives reasons to think that Katie Johnson is a fraud.

    Like the proverb “Caesar’s wife should avoid even the appearance of impropriety,” people who investigate 9-11 etc. should make a special effort to get their facts right. They should take care not to exaggerate, the truth is bad enough.

  • Being a feminist or Democrat (or nonfeminist or Republican) is irrelevant to a person’s credibility. It’s possible that Lisa Bloom was part of a conspiracy to invent a fictitious Katy Johnson story, in which case Bloom is guilty of criminal fraud as well as civil libel. That would be quite a risk for her to take, to say the least. It’s also possible that she was somehow duped by others, in which case they would be running the civil and criminal liabilities, while she would just get disbarred for negligence.

    The same is true of Johnson’s attorney Thomas Meagher.

    It is also possible that Johnson’s story is at least roughly accurate. There is supporting testimony from another Epstein victim.

    If you set aside your prejudices about Democrats-Republicans, feminists-antifeminists, Trump-Hillary, etc., and just look at what’s been reported, you’ll agree with me that the allegations are credible (but of course unproven). If you suffer emotional blocks against thinking such things about a President, as so many did when similar things were reported about Bill Clinton, I sympathize…but also urge you to get psychiatric treatment so you can learn to face unpleasant facts and then get to work cleaning up this country.

    https://www.scribd.com/doc/310836504/Katie-Johnson-Trump-Lawsuit

    • Replies: @Rurik
    @Kevin Barrett


    If you set aside your prejudices about Democrats-Republicans, feminists-antifeminists, Trump-Hillary, etc., and just look at what’s been reported, you’ll agree with me that the allegations are credible (but of course unproven). If you suffer emotional blocks against thinking such things about a President, as so many did when similar things were reported about Bill Clinton, I sympathize…but also urge you to get psychiatric treatment
     
    it isn't about our prejudices, but ((theirs)) (the ((media)), iow)

    If you're a feminist telling lies about Justice Kavanagh, (as someone mentioned) then they'll gush over your heroism.

    If you're a non-feminist living on a mountain in Ruby Ridge, Idaho, then a federal government assassin can put a sniper's bullet though your head, and all is good.

    So you see it all depends on how they perceive you.

    With Trump, their derangement is legendary. Their hatred is unhinged, and drives them literally to fits. If he says the two sides fighting in Charlottesville, both had bad elements, they'll turn themselves inside out with apoplectic convulsions.

    Whereas with Hillary, she can cackle over an assassinated head of state, murdered in a criminal putsch against a nation's sovereign government, and they'll all giggle along with her.

    So you see the one-sided double standard could not be more stark.

    Lying feminists and war criminals with the blood of thousands of innocents on their hands, is all good.

    But an honest non-feminist who doesn't love ZOG, can be executed with nary a peep.

    And for this reason, if they had something on Hillary, it'd be preposterous to expect them to pursue it. Duh.

    But if they had something on Trump, OMG brace yourselves for a screeching hysteria the likes of which will make the Russian hacking of our democracy seem like a nothing burger.

  • @TKK

    A society that no longer believes in God no longer believes in truth, since God is al-haqq, THE truth, without Whom the whole notion of truth has no metaphysical basis.
     
    Using Islamic terms when speaking about Truth?

    That's cute. No agenda here- just a truth teller seeking to help Christians have peace and freedom, huh?

    Cue the jazz hands and bowler hat. This author is that shady- naked propaganda. He, and Unz, insult our intelligence.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    I assume Christians agree with the Qur’an that “God is Truth.” Some (formerly Islamophobic) Christians who have studied the texts in the original languages say the Qur’an probably represents Jesus’s words and concepts at least as accurately as the Gospels do: http://bridgestocommonground.org/a-deadly-misunderstanding/

    • Replies: @jack daniels
    @Kevin Barrett

    I don't understand what is meant by 'God is truth' nor do I see why morality would be impossible in a godless world. "God is truth" sounds like pantheism, only taken up to the level of thoughts rather than things. Godly people and atheists tend to agree on what is right or wrong e.g. both oppose murder, rape, theft, cruelty, slander, and so on. It's true that without God there would be no guarantee that good will triumph and wickedness succumb, but goodness would still be goodness etc. I respect Islam and religion generally, but I have never seen the appeal of those two claims.

    Replies: @Jon Baptist, @Kevin Barrett

  • @Barry Gordon
    @Whitewolf

    He claimed that "pulling it" meant pulling the firemens' efforts to save the building. True? Maybe, maybe not.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Alden, @Whitewolf

    Definitely not. Larry said (quoting from memory): “I was talking with the, er…fire department commander, and we were saying, you know, there has been such terrible loss of life, maybe the best thing to do…is pull it. So we made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”

    There were no firefighters in WTC-7. (If there had been, he wouldn’t say “it,” he would say “them.” But there weren’t any, so the grammatical point is irrelevant.)

    The “decision to pull” – “watched it collapse” statement, as all native English speakers know, carries a close causal and chronological link. Making the decision to pull caused the collapse, and the collapse happened shortly after the decision was made.

    If there had been firefighters in the building at 11 a.m. rescuing Barry Jennings and Michael Hess (the only reports of firefighters ever entering WTC-7) and if Larry and his friend posing as a “er…fire department commander” had “pulled” them out then, and watched the building collapse at 5:20, six hours later, OBVIOUSLY Larry wouldn’t have said it the way he said it. He would have said “we pulled the firefighters out of the building in the morning. Later that evening, when it collapsed, we were glad we had” or something to that effect.

    Those of us researching 9/11 in 2004 made a huge stink about Larry’s confession, which was well known by then. It was only many years later when Larry finally put out his silly alibi about “pulling firefighters.”

    Only a fool or someone ignorant of colloquial English could think Larry was talking about pulling out firefighters. These people must really think we’re stupid.

    • Agree: Rurik
    • Replies: @Sean
    @Kevin Barrett

    Kevin Barrett says this man is telling the truth.


    https://youtu.be/8aNS3aC9EXQ?t=16


    Obvious lie, the Fire Chief is not going to ask the building owner for permission to pull his men out.


    Never mind what he meant by what he says he said. I say Silverstein was and is lying about the whole thing, because he never said it. Only later in order to make it look like he was more interested in the lives of firefighters than his properties did he pretend there was any such decision on his part. So it was a attempt to burnish his reputation as a humanitarian for who lives are more important than a healthy balance sheet.

    But Barrett thinks Silverstein was virtually admitting that he murdered thousands of people. This would be an act of self immolation if he did it and them stayed in the country; does Barrett not understand that Silverstein would be virtually committing suicide? A queue of self appointed judge jury and executioners would form to kill him. In no time at all there would be the begining of attempts on his life, and finally one would work no matter what the security. How can anyone believe the Truthers believe what they is true, if they are not even willing to do what the Pizzagate nut did, let alone punish a mass murderer. This article of Barrett stinks of a total lack of seriousness.

    Replies: @AnonStarter, @Wizard of Oz

    , @Curmudgeon
    @Kevin Barrett

    Unfortunately, all I see in your essay is a whole lot of allegations, and virtually no evidence.
    "Everyone in New York knew" means commonly accepted as true, which means it can be given judicial notice, just like the 6 ka-gillion narrative.
    What is "reported" to have been found in Epstein's residences, is not evidence. A disc with people's names on it "having sex" is not evidence that the disc contains that.
    As much as I detest Dersho-shitz and disagree that sealed documents of a settlement in a civil suit should be opened for public scrutiny, Dersho-shitz claims his lawyers have uncovered emails, that Roberts/Giuffre tried to block, where Roberts/Giuffre states to her lawyers that she doesn't know who Dersho-shitz is. It was her lawyers putting her up to it. What else have they put her up to?
    Roberts/Giuffre's statement about Andrew, "He knows what he did" is like the question "when did you stop beating your wife?" There is a presumption of something proven. My guess is that the Royal Family's security detail knows when Andrew takes a dump, and how much toilet paper he used to wipe. So, the choice is, they are in on it, or it's bullshit.
    One of Kate Middleton's school mates claims she was done by Epstein. I'm supposed to beleive that a whiny teen, whose parents are paying $50k a year to send her to a toney private school, didn't have any money so she jerked Epstein off for a couple of hundred bucks?

    I have little doubt that wherever endeavor a member of the Zionist club undertakes, sleaze of some sort will be present. Just what Epstein was up to is yet to be proven.

    As for the "me too" swarm around Epstein, it's different than the one around surrounding Harvey Weinstein. Those women knew going in to Hollywood what was needed to make them successful. The "casting couch" story has been around since the 1930s, and Marilyn Monroe, after marrying Joe DiMaggio, said she'd never have to suck another Jewish c@ck. While Epstein's accusers may not have known going in, don't try to tell me they didn't understand what prostitution was.

    , @PabloPickAsso
    @Kevin Barrett

    Not so fast.

    Those sceptical of the “pull=demolish” idea suggest that “pull it” could mean “pull a firefighting operation”, instead. And even sites collecting examples to show that it is a demolition term (see http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/wtc7/pullit.html, for instance), offer some support for this idea....

    And we have other issues with the “demolition” interpretation of Silverstein’s remarks:

    Problem #1, Larry Silverstein is not a demolition contractor, neither was the fire department chief, so why should we assume they’d be using slang demolition terms?

    Problem #2, Silverstein says "they made that decision to pull", for instance -- the Fire Department. If "pull" means "demolish", then he's saying the Fire Department may not have decided to bring the building down if they couldn't contain the fire, but because it was beyond them, they decided to blow it up. Does this make sense? Not in the slightest.

    Problem #3, Silverstein is suggesting that the decision to demolish the building was optional. It might not have happened. Does this fit with the idea of a convenient insurance scam? No, not at all.

    Problem #4, why would the Fire Department willingly agree to engage in a multi-million dollar insurance fraud?

    Problem #5, and since when do Fire Departments blow up buildings anyway?

    Problem #6, and if it's so obvious that WTC7 was demolished, then why are the insurance companies not suing Silverstein for fraud?

    Problem #7, and why would Silverstein admit this on television?

    http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_pulled.html

    Replies: @Iris, @Tony Ryals, @AnonStarter

  • @Sean
    Israel faked 9/11 to get Iraq invaded but the real responsibility for 9/11 was pinned on the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. Iraq was invaded as a result of 9/11 though.

    If Israel could fake 9/11 why on Earth would they not pin it on Iran instead of Afghanistan, and invade Iraq in the same way.

    If Israel had faked 9/11 they would have arraged to fram Iran and got Iraq invaded as well, thereby killing two birds with one stone. Israel had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. Not a thing.

    Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert, @Anon

    9/11 was faked not to frame any specific country but the Muslim world in general, hence the “Global War on Terror”. Any specific country could then be targetted as part of that. Here is former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak explaining it to the BBC on the day of 9/11 :

    Video Link

    9/11 was an Israeli plot through and through. Israel itself was created by terrorists and it has engaged in terrorism ever since.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    There must be many in the US who have an AR 15 and a truck, so why is Silverstein not being shot at?

    The reason is incredibly obvious: this 9/11 conspiracy talk and accusation of living identified individuals as being mass murderers is your way to while away the hours. Trutherism is just a game to play. You do not believe a word of it. Not a one of you has ever acted accordance with this endlessly vement accusation of Silverstein.

    Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert

  • @NoseytheDuke
    @Kevin Barrett

    Wrong. While a lease of 100 years is admittedly very long it is a common period with real estate property and certainly is still very much a lease. A purchase would likely involve a much larger down-payment as anyone who has ever leased a building or even a motor vehicle can attest.

    A larger down payment on the WTC buildings in the case of a purchase would have resulted in the scam generating far less profit for Lucky Larry and obviously wasn't seen as necessary, and there may have been greater legal obligations as an owner rather than simply as a lease holder.

    Why not just use the accurate word instead an inaccurate word shrouded by, " better described by"?

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    If you say “Larry leased the buildings,” your listeners assume he would only control them for a short period, and certainly wouldn’t have the power to choose to tear them down and rebuild whatever he wanted. (Just as when you and I lease an apartment.) But Larry had and still has total power over the property, just as in “ownership.” So essentially it IS ownership.

    “Purchased them on a 100 year lease” is the complete and accurate expression. But even that understates his ownership, because he demanded “right to rebuild” etc. etc. in the contract, giving him the same kind of total control over the property that “owners” have.

    If I take out a 100 year lease on something, with the right to tear it down or alter it in any way I choose, obviously I “own” it. I am not just “leasing” it!

    • Agree: ChuckOrloski
    • Replies: @Assad al-islam
    @Kevin Barrett


    “Purchased them on a 100 year lease” is the complete and accurate expression. But even that understates his ownership, because he demanded “right to rebuild” etc. etc. in the contract, giving him the same kind of total control over the property that “owners” have.
     
    Very true! Goes back to the days of Thomas Robert Malthus. Finally, to some extent Thacher was able to abolish somewhat the concept of, “Purchased on a 100 year lease”

    The Land belonged to Monarch and no one had a right to the title of land!
    , @NoseytheDuke
    @Kevin Barrett

    Okay then a lease with conditions attached, but still a lease. A purchaser would assume the legal burden of such things as asbestos and other issues so I think it's safe to assume that Lucky Larry knows the difference between a lease and a purchase even if you are a little murky on the matter.

    When discussing 9/11 inaccuracies are not helpful and can actually be quite harmful.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wizard of Oz

  • @Twodees Partain
    @Iris

    "The hypothesis that the CIA wanted to only scare and influence JFK with a faked assassination attempt, but was forcibly overtaken by a foreign secret service who carried out the real assassination makes a lot of sense."

    Not to me. It's one of the sillier things that Laurent Guyénot has blurted out. At the time of the assassination, the CIA was much larger and better funded than Mossad. The idea of Mossad forcibly taking over a CIA mission at that time is laughable.

    What makes sense to me is a scenario in which Dulles loyalists in the CIA launched an assassination mission at the behest of Israel and used Mossad assets and personnel to help carry it out.

    Unless you think that in the early 1960s Mossad was already the world's most powerful intelligence organization and was able to overpower the CIA, FBI and NSA on their own turf and assassinate an American president on their own, then force the entire US federal law enforcement apparatus as well as the military to cover it up, then Laurent is howling at nothing.

    Replies: @Robjil, @Kevin Barrett

    There was presumably a convergence of interests between Israelis horrified by JFK’s commitment to stopping their nuclear program and Americans who wanted a coup for other reasons. But don’t underestimate Israel’s talent for manipulating Western intelligence services. For an fiction-based-on-fact insider’s perspective, read John Le Carre’s The Little Drummer Girl.

    • Agree: ChuckOrloski
    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    @Kevin Barrett

    I don't doubt that there was manipulation, especially given JFK's intention of stopping Israel's nuclear weapon development. My point is that the assassination was likely a CIA mission done at the behest of Israel. That's what I wrote. JFK had also announced his intention to break up the CIA and had fired Allen Dulles.

    The hypothesis that the CIA was intending to set up a close call that would scare JFK into letting Israel have its way and that the Mossad turned it into an actual assassination is ludicrous. Laurent Guyénot thought that up. I don't see how otherwise intelligent people would actually buy into it.

    Maybe reading novels leads to that kind of thinking.

    Replies: @Sean, @Iris

  • During this run-up to the sacred anniversary of the neocon-orchestrated human sacrifice event, let’s talk about what 9/11 did to freedom—academic and otherwise—with science professor William Willers…then (in the second hour of this live show recorded August 30) discuss the 9/11 wars with two guys tasked to fight them: Gen. Dana Pittard and Sgt. Wes...
  • @Harold Smith
    Dr. J. leroy Hulsey et al. have just released a draft of their study on the "collapse" of WTC7.

    https://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Will any qualified people will step forward to defend NIST’s WTC-7 report in a debate with Hulsey and his supporters? I very much doubt it. I couldn’t pay anybody from my own University to defend the official version of 9/11! http://debate911.blogspot.com

  • As the 18th anniversary of 9/11 approached, the arrest and alleged suicide of Jeffrey Epstein made headlines—and raised questions about the credibility of official narratives. As Eric Rasmusen writes: “Everybody, it seems, in New York society knew by 2000 that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were corrupting teenage girls, but the press wouldn’t cover it.”...
  • @The Dark Night
    @DaveE

    You consider that Jesus was a Messiah, believe that he was sacrificed as a scapegoat, call him Chist, accept the idea of him being a redeemer, who carried the sins of men, and at the same time reckon, that the OT is a pack of garbage that needs to be thrown into fire.

    But without the OT all the aforementioned ideas and believes wouldn't exist. The teaching of the NT makes no sense, except if it's connected to the OT premises.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @lysias

    Both the NT and Qur’an radically revise the tribal, materialist, amoral/unethical OT to make it universal, spiritual, and moral/ethical.

    Guyénot’s From Yahweh to Zion critiques the unrevised “Jewish” reading of the OT: https://www.amazon.com/Yahweh-Zion-Jealous-Promised-Civilizations/dp/0996143041/ref=sr_1_1

    • Replies: @Rurik
    @Kevin Barrett


    radically revise the tribal, materialist, amoral/unethical OT
     
    Did you get permission from the adherents of the Torah?

    Isn't that the tragic rift in Islam, that some of its adherents revised some things, and didn't get permission from the other adherents?

    I admit to being unlettered in the minutia of theology, but I do wonder if Jews are on board with your Muslim and Christian authority to revise the Tanach, Talmud, Midrash and Pentateuch, without their express permission.
    , @The Dark Night
    @Kevin Barrett

    Nope.

    Though it was not the point, but I can comment on this as well: “But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.” — Matthew 15:26

  • @jack daniels
    @Kevin Barrett

    I don't understand what is meant by 'God is truth' nor do I see why morality would be impossible in a godless world. "God is truth" sounds like pantheism, only taken up to the level of thoughts rather than things. Godly people and atheists tend to agree on what is right or wrong e.g. both oppose murder, rape, theft, cruelty, slander, and so on. It's true that without God there would be no guarantee that good will triumph and wickedness succumb, but goodness would still be goodness etc. I respect Islam and religion generally, but I have never seen the appeal of those two claims.

    Replies: @Jon Baptist, @Kevin Barrett

    One way to explain what is meant by “God is Truth” is by way of the classic metaphysical arguments. Neoplatonism, Ibn al-Arabi, etc. are the obvious references.

    Another is to agree with the postmodern philosophers that in a Godless world there is no truth, just power.

    You say: “It’s true that without God there would be no guarantee that good will triumph and wickedness succumb…” It’s worse than that. Without God or some equivalent, those who question what people “tend to agree on” will realize that “opposing murder, rape, theft, etc.” is an arbitrary rather than a necessary choice. Some of these questioners/skeptics/philosophers will end up agreeing with and joining forces with the psychopaths, the 2% who have no inborn aversion to murder, rape, theft, etc.

    Additionally, without God or some equivalent metaphysical basis for morality, there is no good reason to rigorously adhere to truth.

    Today’s post-religious ruling elite is a cesspool of psychopathic liars and criminals, and many of them are not born psychopaths, but were taught to be sociopathic by atheist philosophers like the self-professed “teacher of evil” Leo Strauss.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    @Kevin Barrett

    "without God or some equivalent metaphysical basis for morality, there is no good reason to rigorously adhere to truth"

    Well you would have fitted in well with the cruel and rigid Sir/Saint Thomas More's clique as he prescribed in Utopia the death sentence for those who denied the existence of God or the afterlife. The afterlife was meant to froghten the powerful who would otherwise be nastier thsn they were.

    But what I quote above is surely made nonsensical by the overwhelming evidence that God, as omnipotent creator, doesn't carw a damn for us or about what we do. The only hypothesis that makes sense is one that "made in His image" gives a clue to. He/She/It, if there is one such eternal being, must be lonely and bored so set off the Big Bang and, by happy chance, subsequent evolution of life, for the stimulating diversion and entertainment value. If he had actually cared about the curious, often violent, behaviour He observed he wouldn't have left us so uncertain about his instructions and product description. Jews left venerating Moses, the genocidal psychopath; Christians all over the place from Early Fathers to criminal Popes, splittist Greeks, Hussites, Albigensians, Cathars, Lutherans, Calvinists and on and on without even mentioning Muslim sects anf the Prophets ravings. And why would he neglect to tell bollions of Hindus and Buddhists the good news and how to behave with pork and Sabbaths?

    Of course once one picks up the clue that he's made in our image you know that he wouldn't have stopped at one Big Bang and one universe: there must be trillions of them, indeed an infonitw number.

    Replies: @AnonStarter

  • Ronald Bleier has just published a collection of 9/11-related essays entitled No Plane Crashes on 9/11: Exposing the Illusion. I think it makes a good case against the claim that hijacked-by-humans planes caused the carnage on 9/11. As for whether big planes crashed where we’re told they did, and if so which big planes, I...
  • @dimples
    From Chapter 9 of this crap book in which almost everything is wrong:

    "Concluding observations about the Somerset County crash site
    The alleged crash site in Somerset County and the events that occurred there on the morning of 9/11 remain a mystery that the U.S. authorities clearly do not wish to reveal. .....Were body parts actually found, and how were they identified? "

    For pictures of plane debris:
    google "Images of Crash Site and Investigation - Flight 93 National Park Service"

    It was reported that about 600lbs of body parts were recovered.
    The DNA used to identify the bodies was processed by the military.

    A summary of the forensic treatment is covered in
    'Hard Evidence: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology' by
    Dawnie Wolfe Steadman p289 etc

    So yes a plane did crash and bodies were recovered as you would expect. The only real question is which plane and whose bodies? Why would the plotters not use anything but a plane for the crash, unless they want to make it even more difficult for themselves than it was already?

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Twodees Partain

    The ten pictures at https://www.nps.gov/media/photo/gallery-item.htm?pg=3941191&id=C7A5CE33-155D-451F-670470E00A6C301D&gid=C7A45234-155D-451F-67A019C294E6A905 provide underwhelming evidence that 200,000 pounds of airliner and contents were excavated from the earth beneath the virtually empty 15 foot diameter hole in the ground where USG says the plane “disappeared into the soft earth.”

    The NTSB, which always “reconstructs” every destroyed plane piece by piece after every crash, showed up to do its job at Shanksville but was sent home by the FBI.

    If anyone can find a full record of video and photo evidence documenting the supposed excavation of the 200,000 pounds of wreckage of Flight 93, and chain-of-possession evidence about where it went after alleged excavation and where it is now, please let me know!

    • Replies: @BlackDragon
    @Kevin Barrett

    Remember that Boeing MAX that hit the deck at estimated 500 mph in Africa earlier this year (I forgot the month) It lefts a 30ft crater in the ground and the debris was scattered for hundreds of feet around the site engines and all. Very easy to see the wreckage. So that alone exposes Shankesville as a fake crash site. It is IMPOSSIBLE not to have debris on the ground or clear it up before the NTSB got there.
    This also applies to MH370, impossible for NO debris in the WHOLE ocean after an airliner crashed into it from 10km up!! Again look at the debris documented from MH17! (Shot down by the Ukrainian Airforce MIG29!!!)

    , @dimples
    @Kevin Barrett

    From Wikipedia “United Airlines Flight 93”

    "All human remains were found within a 70-acre (28 ha) area surrounding the impact point.[105] Somerset County Coroner Wally Miller was involved in the investigation and identification of the remains. In examining the wreckage, the only human body part he could see was part of a backbone.[106] Miller later found and identified 1,500 pieces of human remains totaling about 600 pounds (272 kg), or eight percent of the total.[107] The rest of the remains were consumed by the impact.[108]"

    From 'Hard Evidence: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology' Chapter 23


    "As in all disasters, the responsibility for victim identification resided with the local medicolegal authority—in this case the Somerset County coroner. With the scene under law enforcement control, the coroner needed to locate and outfit a temporary morgue. A National Guard Armory building (a repair shop for military tanks) a few miles from the crash site was chosen, and the coroner and FBI requested federal assistance for the victim identification process through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Disaster Mortuary Operational Response Team (DMORT) Region III team. The fifty-member DMORT team was activated on September 13. In addition to other forensic and mortuary specialists, the team also included eight anthropologists, including the team commander and two anthropologists from the Mercyhurst team. With previous experience in mass disaster victim identification, several of the DMORT anthropologists took on responsibilities for the Flight 93 response that included team management, protocol development, database management, and data verification. “

    I’ve definitely read an article which stated that Bush took away responsibility for the DNA examination from the local Somerset County Medical Examiner and placed it in the hands of the military, however the above segment states otherwise.

    For persons wanting more pics of the plane debris, feel free to FOI the FBI! I'm sure you and a million others want the chain of custody etc etc, but sadly cannot have. By various legal sleights of hand debris from all the planes cannot be examined. At least that was the situation 10 years ago. The NTSB was sent away by the FBI because I assume they did not want the plane to be identified. The crash site being soft dirt overburden was I expect chosen so that the plane would be substantially buried on impact. No parts would be spread about available to be photographed or pinched by the public. All 911 crash sites have this characteristic, apart from a few parts including engine of Flight 175.

    In my opinion the original plane carrying the original passengers did not crash at the site. However it’s clear a plane did crash. How the DNA swap was managed is a curly one. Flight 93 was also a mail plane and mail (if you are going to plant it) must be fresh. I assume therefore the plotters pinched a few mail bags from the original Flight 93 before it took off in case they were needed for a drone plane crash.

    Replies: @dimples, @paranoid goy

  • @dimples
    @dimples

    An alternate theory, which has just occurred to me, is that the swarthy Arabic-speaking Israeli special forces team that did the hijack just bailed out of the original plane. The Cockpit Voice Recorder features a loud wind noise that sounds like a door is open.

    This would have the obvious advantage that all the evidence at the crash site would be kosher.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Hippopotamusdrome

    This theory has occurred to others. It explains Daniel Lewin…though why he was using his own name is a mystery.

    • Replies: @dimples
    @Kevin Barrett

    I've always assumed that the death of Daniel Lewin was another proof that the hijackers were not the canonical Arab hijackers. He had been placed in the seat directly in front of one of the hijackers according to the seating arrangements released by the FBI. This suggests foreknowledge on the part of the plotters, who took steps to neutralize him by cutting his throat before he could make a move.

    However why he would have changed his name, or why this shows that the real hijackers bailed out, you've got me there.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

  • @dimples
    @Kevin Barrett

    I've always assumed that the death of Daniel Lewin was another proof that the hijackers were not the canonical Arab hijackers. He had been placed in the seat directly in front of one of the hijackers according to the seating arrangements released by the FBI. This suggests foreknowledge on the part of the plotters, who took steps to neutralize him by cutting his throat before he could make a move.

    However why he would have changed his name, or why this shows that the real hijackers bailed out, you've got me there.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Some speculate that Daniel Lewin and other Israeli commandos hijacked the plane, set the controls for the WTC, and bailed out. If so, Lewin should have used an assumed name.

  • First hour: Richard Gage, AIA is a 30-year San Francisco Bay Area architect and member of the American Institute of Architects. He is the founding member of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. As the 18th anniversary of 9/11 approaches, Dr. Leroy Hulsey of the University of Alaska has spearheaded a new study showing in...
  • Here’s an interesting presentation by physicist Heinz Pommer including an unusual explanation of why conventional explosives might have been used in a nuclear demolition: https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/09/01/breathtaking-solving-nuclear-9-11-the-pommer-report/

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
    @Kevin Barrett


    an unusual explanation of why conventional explosives might have been used in a nuclear demolition
     
    All talk of nuclear detonations is an easily falsifiable hypothesis that anyone can test by wandering around ground zero with a Geiger counter. They're available on Amazon. What say you give it a try, Kevin?
    , @Veritas X-
    @Kevin Barrett

    Thanks for the link to Heinz Pommer's presentations.
    I normally listen a minimum of 2X before ever posting a comment concerning 'scientific investigation'.
    But, I'll make an exception for expediency's sake.

    So.
    From what I've heard from Arto Lauri in Finland, there were *mini nuclear reactors* placed in the basement of WTC 1 & 2.
    They were Swedish ASEA reactors.
    Of course this is always denied. Why? The simple fact is a nuclear-power plant is impossible to have in Manhattan because of 'zoning laws', etc.
    Oh. I'm crazy?

    Well, ASEA(Sweden) merged with Brown Boveri(Switzerland) and became ABB.
    2 'neutral' countries/non-aligned (cough-cough) , with no atom bombs but 1st class nuclear tech.
    You did known Donald Rumsfeld was....
    "US defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, was a member of the ABB board from 1990 to 2001. In January 2000, ABB signed a $200 million deal for two nuclear power stations in North Korea."?

    May I suggest You take contact with Arto Lauri.
    The discussion was in Finnish with rudimentary subtitles in English, so only an astute person with knowledge of Scandinavian history & languages I would think would catch-it.
    It would be missed by almost everyone.
    I'm an old N.J.-guy, living in Scandinavia for many many decades.
    I've lived in Finland during the 1980's and am pretty good at understanding/speaking Finnish.

    I've also actually, have been 'inside' Sweden's 1st experimental atomic reactor.
    It's not at Studsvik which is the normal answer.
    It was in the bedrock under a building at KTH-Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan(Royal Institute of Technology) in Stockholm.
    Probably built during the 1950's.
    Where?
    HERE: https://www.hitta.se/kartan!~59.34940,18.06940,16.779644352357224z/tr!i=ircRqx3e/tileLayer!l=3?usergeo=1
    Between the Cafeteria/ Q-Huset and the Swedish Military College/Försvarshögkolan ... Drottning Kristinas Väg 49.
    Considering when it was built and its diminutive size, I'd say a mini-atomic reactor from the 1970/1980's could be pretty damn small.

    Anyway, try doing that Kevin.
    Cheers X- in Sweden

    Replies: @Iris

  • Rabbi Daniel Lehmann, with a history of advocating for Israel despite its many human rights abuses, is about to be inaugurated president of the ‘most comprehensive center for the graduate study of religion in North America’ – a ‘mostly-Christian’ center with a focus on peace and justice. Lehmann has already opposed a prominent Muslim professor...
  • This appointment illustrates how Zionist Sabbatean Frankist Satanists have taken over what used to be Western Christianity. Tzvi, the founder of Sabbatean Frankist Satanism, taught his followers to systematically violate the Ten Commandments: “Though shalt kill, thou shalt commit adultery,” etc. Sabbateans believe that by committing abominations they can force God to bring on the Messiah, a Jewish military conqueror who will rule the world from a blood sacrifice temple built on the site of today’s al-Aqsa mosque. Their biggest abomination of all is the genocide of the Holy Land.

    Today’s Catholic Church is a cesspool of Sabbatean Frankist Satanism, featuring systematic child abuse, money laundering, and other criminal activities, and the Protestants aren’t far behind. The GTU is now officially a branch of the Church of Satan.

    • Replies: @anon
    @Kevin Barrett

    > Satanists have taken over what used to be Western Christianity.

    Or rather, the Jewish-authored Holy Hook has taken over what used to be Western Christianity, since its first mass printing in 1455. Europe adapted Jewish-inspired Christianity to its culture best when European "Sacred Tradition" was elevated over the degenerate teachings inside the Jewish-authored Bible, and when reading, owning, or distributing that Jew-inspired book was as brutally banned as in any Communist regime. Bible-monger William Tyndale was burned at the stake, and Christendom will return to its Medieval glory when the Sola-Juda, Bible-thumping Bitter-Clingers are cleansed from the land with fire. Deus Vult!

    https://i.imgur.com/1SmLym6.jpg

  • Two years ago, I asked, “Will Russia Leave the West?” The world’s largest territorial country—sprawling from its major European city St. Petersburg to its vast Far Eastern territories and long border with China—Russia cannot, of course, depart the West geographically. But it can do so politically, economically, and strategically. Indeed, where Russia belongs, where it...
  • Russia is a Christian republic.

    Vladimir Putin is a Christian republican.

    The underpinnings of ‘western-civilization’ have been discarded in Western Europe.

    • Replies: @Quartermaster
    @APilgrim

    Putin has been shown to be an inveterate liar. Christians are not liars. Therefore, Putin cannot be a Christian.

    Replies: @Anon, @APilgrim

  • Russia has not yet entirely sold its soul to the moneychangers and the apostles of progress. It still has saints and sinners. (Its biggest sinners are gangsters who may actually run the world, as much as anyone does: https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/09/02/evidence-why-is-putin-kissing-israels-ass-what-do-they-have-on-him/ .)

    Literature still mattered even in the hellhole that was Soviet Russia because Russians still understood, consciously or not, that the choices the human soul makes in its earthly journey have monumental consequences. Dostoevsky expressed this better than anyone ever has.

    Today Russia is rediscovering its Christian identity, which terrifies the Sabbatean-Frankist secular-progressivist-materialist post-Christian West. The Grand Inquisitors in NY, DC, the City of London, and Tel Aviv are delivering an increasingly panicked monologue.

    Shaykh Imran Hosein’s thesis—that the End Times will witness a war between the forces of Christ (Eastern Christianity allied with real Islam) and those of Antichrist (the Zionist West)—seems increasingly plausible.

    • LOL: FB
    • Replies: @Steve in Greensboro
    @Kevin Barrett

    "Eastern Christianity allied with real Islam"?

    The Muslims in Middle East have engaged in genocide against Christians in the original cradles of Christianity. With allies like Muslims, Christians don't need enemies.

    , @anonymous
    @Kevin Barrett

    I don't understand why people do not recognize that Putin, like Trump, is a Jewish mafia member and 100% supports the zionist entity and its criminal acts, otherwise the apartheid state would have not been able to exist. One of the reason behind existence of Israel is RUSSIAN support and Putin cooperation with the criminal tribe and Netanyahu.

    How many times Putin, the Zionist stooge, should say I value the relations with apartheid entity and he has done EVERYTHING to protect the Zionist criminal acts in Syria. Russia is one of the countries where played important role, like Britain, France and US, to erect the criminal entity, where you call it israel. Russia is as GUILTY as the other criminal western states.

    How many times Russia and Putin betrayed Muslims and aligned with the west to protect the shitty entity and to protect the Western interest? How many times Russia and Putin voted for ILLEGAL
    Sanctions against Iran to please the criminals like himself and to protect the interest of the Zionists?

    How many times Russia and Putin listened to Israel and the criminal west to go against Iran, Palestine, and the Arab world?

    Who allowed Libya to be destroyed?

    Replies: @Priss Factor

    , @Assad al-islam
    @Kevin Barrett


    Shaykh Imran Hosein’s thesis—that the End Times will witness a war between the forces of Christ (Eastern Christianity allied with real Islam) and those of Antichrist (the Zionist West)—seems increasingly plausible.
     
    Shaikh Imran Hosein is a bosom buddy of John Hagee. Both have prophesied the End Times many a time, but always missed the mark. And, people still buy their crap. I believe that you are a Muslim, whose belief should be that "Only God Has Hidden Knowledge". O' yes, the end of world is always been around the corner. LOL!

    It makes people dizzy with glee predicting the End Times!

    Shaikh Imran Hosein speakth with a fork tongue!
    , @A123
    @Kevin Barrett


    Today Russia is rediscovering its Christian identity, which terrifies the Sabbatean-Frankist secular-progressivist-materialist post-Christian West. The Grand Inquisitors in NY, DC, the City of London, and Tel Aviv are delivering an increasingly panicked monologue.
     
    It would be better to say that:

    Today Russia is rediscovering its Christian identity, which terrifies the Islamofascist, Globalist elites. The Grand Inquisitors in Tehran, Brussels, and Frankfurt are becoming hysterical as their anti-democratic, anti-Christian rent extraction schemes are threatened by the unification of Orthodox and Protestant Christianity.

    Shaykh Imran Hosein’s thesis—that the End Times will witness a war between the forces of Christ (Eastern Christianity allied with real Islam) and those of Antichrist (the Zionist West)—seems increasingly plausible.
     
    This seems wholly implausible:

    -- Ayatollah Khameni seems bent on starting a Shia-Sunni war that will be an extermination level event for the Shia and remind the Sunnis why Roman history gives us the term "Pyrrhic Victory". I keep hoping that the Iranian people will remove Khameni rather then commit mass suicide as a people, but ultimately it is their choice.

    -- The Real Forces of Christ include western Protestants and eastern Orthodox. Again, trying to use an artificially placed East-West 'line' in the post-USSR world does not work particularly well.

    PEACE

    Replies: @Alf Tupper, @Alfred

  • It didn’t take long for the American Administration to crudely interfere with an open society’s most sacred ethos, that of academic freedom. We learned this weekend that the US Department of Education has ordered Duke University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to remake their joint Middle East studies program after concluding...
  • Prior to 9/11 the consensus of experts on the Middle East, Islam, Comparative Religion, etc. was that MI6 Zionist Bernard Lewis was an ignorant, extremist lunatic. When Lewis feuded with Edward Said, the whole academy sided with Said, who was elected president of MLA in a landslide.

    The 9/11 neocon-Zionist coup terrorized the academy and made Lewis a mainstream guru, advisor to Bush Jr. and bestselling author. Since then the insane Zionist party line, which has always dominated in both liberal and conservative media as well as politics, has been forced on the academy, whose experts are smart enough and knowledgable enough to know how insane it is…but what can they do?

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
    @Kevin Barrett

    Yeah well Edward Said was a fake, claimed to be from Palestine but was later found out to be born in Egypt.
    Usually a fib like that will get you fired in Academia but he weathered the storm because of his victim status. Good for him, his book on Orientalism was outstanding.
    Your comments about Lewis are laughable, people say the same shit about Said.
    One mans ceiling is another mans floor.
    Your 9/11 BS is a syndrome a sickness. You are neither rational or sane.
    What academy?

    Replies: @Wally, @bjondo

  • Omar Ramahi, a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Waterloo, is the author of Muslims’ Greatest Challenge: Choosing Between Tradition and Islam. In this interview Dr. Ramahi builds on our earlier conversation. He argues that many Muslims have mistaken their cultural traditions for Islam, creating friction between people of various Islamic...
  • @geoffrey of martigny
    muslims are fixated on dinar and dirham being the only allowable coinage.but i respect their being the only people still rejecting usury.but if i lend someone gold i might want more gold back.money created as credit could be interest free

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    That is an excellent point, and a good illustration of what Dr. Ramahi is saying.

    The Qur’an bans usury but does not mandate dinar and dirham. The insistence on dinar and dirham is based on non-Qur’anic Islamic tradition, which Dr. Ramahi says ought to be re-thought in light of the Qur’an’s insistence on critical thinking.

  • In late 2006 I was approached by Scott McConnell, editor of The American Conservative (TAC), who told me that his small magazine was on the verge of closing without a large financial infusion. I'd been on friendly terms with McConnell since around 1999, and greatly appreciated that he and his TAC co-founders had been providing...
  • This article is a one-stop WWII Revisionism course. Could political changes some day make it possible to teach such a course at an actual American university?

    • Replies: @Tusk
    @Kevin Barrett

    One can dream...

    , @Germanicus
    @Kevin Barrett

    Considering the UN demand the Palestinians to add "holocaust" to their curriculum, which the refuse naturally, chances are slim, given the state of mind of the US population.
    The UN circumvent it and brainwash Palestinian children in UN schools they established. The generous UN offer is "help in exchange for holocaust indoctrination"

    Besides the Jews, US, UK and Russia are the main enforcers of "holocaust" indoctrination, and the criminal entity EU.

  • As writer or thinker, Jack London can’t touch George Orwell, but he’s nearly the Brit’s equal when it comes to describing society’s bottom. To both, being a writer is as much a physical as an intellectual endeavor. Wading into everything, they braved all discomforts and dangers. This attitude has become very rare, and not just...
  • @gruff
    A great piece by London is "The Unparallelled Invasion", in which he sketches out a solution to the Chinese Question.

    http://london.sonoma.edu/Writings/StrengthStrong/invasion.html

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    • Replies: @eah
    @Kevin Barrett

    I've heard of/but know nothing about the details of alleged US use of biological weapons during the Korean War -- your linked article begins:


    There is no historical controversy as contentious or long-lasting as the North Korean and Chinese charges of U.S. use of biological weapons during the Korean War. For those who believe the charges to be false — and that includes much of American academia, but not all — they must assume the burden of explaining why the North Koreans or Chinese made up any bogus claims to attack the credibility of U.S. forces. Because they had no reason to do that.

    It is a historical fact that the United States carpet-bombed and napalmed North Korea, killing nearly 3 million civilians thereby.

    In other words, massive war crimes are already self-evident, ...
     

    I highlight the part I find particularly absurd.

    Also, re the "massive war crimes", I am perhaps less willing to impose standards used in the modern age of "precision weapons" to describe past warfighting as "war crimes" -- it made me recall this essay:

    Sabine Barnhart -- Würzburg in Flames — 1945 -- 'When collateral damage was the point'

    If able, the Chinese and North Koreans surely would have done the same to American cities -- if I was a soldier, caught up in such a war, I just might want my side to do everything it could, in terms of acceptable warfighting of the day, to end the war and keep me from dying in it.

    , @gruff
    @Kevin Barrett

    If it didn't work, then obviously we weren't really trying.

    , @Anonymous
    @Kevin Barrett

    Yes, we did perpetrate the heinous war crime of germ warfare against North Korea.

    I did research as an undergraduate for a microbiology professor at a major state university back in the 1960's, during the height of the Vietnam war. He had a bound copy of the UN investigation of this matter on a bookshelf in his office to which I had free access. It happened. It was described in detail. I was appalled that this "holier than thou" country would do such a thing to fellow human beings. They deviated from the Third Reich only in the specifics. Then the world started to learn about Agent Orange, Yellow Rain, My-Lai, search and destroy, carpet bombing and napalming civilians and all the rest. Imagine the most vile crime against humanity your mind is capable of contriving and the American government is not only capable of carrying it out, it has probably already done so.

    Replies: @Johnny Walker Read, @JackOH, @eah

  • Structural engineer Dr. Ibrahim Soudy says the new University of Alaska study of the 9/11 “collapse” of WTC-7 proves beyond any doubt that the official story is a pack of lies, and that Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition. (Americans who watch WTC-7’s “collapse” agree.) During this interview Dr. Soudy announces a $10,000 reward...
  • @silviosilver
    Okay cool. This is the sort of 9/11-ism I can wholeheartedly support. I hope the offer is legitimate and I look forward to seeing what happens.

    (The more typical 9/11-ist approach of deranged spamming on the other hand... argh....)

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    The offer is legitimate. Dr. Soudy just emailed me to clarify that his $10k debate offer is open to any US-licensed-and-practicing structural engineer or physical sciences engineer. Once prospective takers have stepped forward, and the most qualified one selected, Dr. Soudy and the challenger will work out the debate format and expert panel selection.

    Regarding the $25,000 offer, Dr. Soudy adds that it too is open to any US-licensed-and-practicing structural engineer or physical sciences engineer. To claim the reward, the engineer will need to write a technical paper refuting the U of Alaska WTC 7 Study AND get it published in one of the top-level American Engineering Journals.

    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    @Kevin Barrett

    And of course Dr Soudy And Dr. Hulsey have evidence that building 7 went down due to a controlled demolition....

    Replies: @Iris, @War for Blair Mountain

    , @dimples
    @Kevin Barrett

    The $25,000 offer sounds a bit naive and asking for trouble. It does not allow for the possibility of a corrupt engineering journal publishing a demonstrably junk peer reviewed paper to get in bigly with the MIC, MSM etc. The MSM will then give it massive publicity, shriek 'Game Over for 911 Truthers' blah blah etc etc. You know the sort of thing.

    Replies: @War for Blair Mountain, @Kevin Barrett

  • The French civic-nationalist and anti-Zionist intellectual Alain Soral was sentenced to two years prison last week for sharing a rap video entitled “Gilets-Jaunes.” The music clip (watch it while you still can) is typical of the Yellow Vests in denouncing French media, political, and financial elites, and making a plea for direct democracy, notably the...
  • @Anonymous
    @Dieter Kief

    Rap has only become mainstream pop music because whites have allowed themselves to become Negrified, nationalists should be resisting that not perpetuating it.

    If a white enjoys black music and black culture then they're no better than an overt open borders liberal in my opinion as the normalisation and acceptance of such "culture" amounts to the same thing in the end, that's why the elites promote it. The problem is if society elevates blacks to the status of "cultural elites", then it makes it very difficult to justify keeping them out of the country.

    Replies: @Polemos, @Kevin Barrett, @Iris

    People aren’t supposed to enjoy cultural production from any place more than five miles from home, especially if the producer has a different skin tone?! JEEZ. No wonder cosmopolitan elites think white nationalists are uncouth morons.

    Good luck trying to convince the French to stop enjoying and appropriating other people’s music, film, literature, cuisine, etc.

    • LOL: Rabbitnexus
    • Replies: @Lot
    @Kevin Barrett

    It isn’t about skin color. Diana Ross is fine and was popular all over Europe. Tina Turner was too and moved to France.

    Angry screaming with a jungle beat and rhyme (“rap”) is a degradation that Dork Right Jihadis-Islamifiers like Sorel promote.

    Again, just what you’d expect from Sorel, a trashy former member of the Communist Party. Always on the side of France’s enemies.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @ATBOTL, @voicum, @Pegasus

    , @Cat Hierophant
    @Kevin Barrett


    People aren’t supposed to enjoy cultural production from any place more than five miles from home, especially if the producer has a different skin tone?!
     
    Who said anything about distance, or skin color? The point is that rap music is barbaric, and the form almost by itself defeats any other message its lyrics (if you can call them that) might theoretically proclaim.

    Replies: @ChuckOrloski, @Marty

    , @Anonymous
    @Kevin Barrett

    Don't let the Kike Lot troll you from the main issue, which isn't music genres. Soral likely chose to post a link to a rap-crap video because he thought African music was more PC—and in spite of his kowtowing to PC standards for music still got arbitrarily punished by the Nose.

  • Structural engineer Dr. Ibrahim Soudy says the new University of Alaska study of the 9/11 “collapse” of WTC-7 proves beyond any doubt that the official story is a pack of lies, and that Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition. (Americans who watch WTC-7’s “collapse” agree.) During this interview Dr. Soudy announces a $10,000 reward...
  • @dimples
    @Kevin Barrett

    The $25,000 offer sounds a bit naive and asking for trouble. It does not allow for the possibility of a corrupt engineering journal publishing a demonstrably junk peer reviewed paper to get in bigly with the MIC, MSM etc. The MSM will then give it massive publicity, shriek 'Game Over for 911 Truthers' blah blah etc etc. You know the sort of thing.

    Replies: @War for Blair Mountain, @Kevin Barrett

    If a corrupt engineering journal publishes a junk paper “refuting” the U. of Alaska study, the stark contrast between the original study and the junk “refutation” will be apparent to all intelligent people, especially science and engineering professionals. “All publicity is good publicity” when the facts are as obvious as they are in the case of WTC-7.

  • David Icke’s new book The Trigger really triggers some people…like The Washington Post‘s passive-aggressive book reviewer Ron Charles, who brags, shedding crocodile tears all the while: “I banned a book. Or at least I helped get it banned, which makes Banned Books Week a little awkward for me this year.” When Charles saw that Barnes...
  • @dimples
    "6. The fact that, according to this second version, the order to scramble jet fighters to protect Washington went to Langley Air Force base instead of the nearer base, Andrews."

    From what I have read fighters at Andrews Air Force Base were not armed up with the necessary guns and missiles. There were actually very few fighters on the eastern seaboard at that time actually armed up and ready to go, so probably the same logic applies to No. 5.


    "11. The fact that the South Tower fell first even though, according to the hypothesis that the buildings collapsed because of fire, this tower, having been hit second and having the smaller fire, should not have collapsed first."

    Surely (assuming a natural collapse for the sake of argument) which building collapsed first would also depend on the type of damage received, where damage occurred etc.


    "13. Larry Silverstein’s statement that he and the fire department decided to “pull” WTC-7…"

    Its clear that Silverstein was talking about pulling the fire fighting operation, otherwise you have to believe that the Fire Department, who had just lost numerous employees in the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2, then began to wire up WTC7 for a perfect controlled demolition while everybody was watching, then proceeded to 'pull' it. Or the Fire Department was in on the plot, a claim which I am sure they would vehemently disagree.

    This is why I would never buy an attempt at a scientific work by a theologian. David Ray Griffin, although his heart is in the right place, is an idiot and a poor scholar.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Phil the Fluter, @Shagbargh Hickory

    The full story of “where were the fighter jets” is actually even more incriminating now than it appeared when The New Pearl Harbor came out in 2004.

    Likewise with the WTC demolitions. Today, virtually every independent scientist or engineer who carefully studies the issue sides with AE911Truth. The most prominent independent scientist who spent years trying to support the official myth of fire-induced collapses, Frank Greening, changed his mind. https://noliesradio.org/archives/73967

    • Agree: Twodees Partain
    • Replies: @Alfred
    @Kevin Barrett

    The most prominent independent scientist who spent years trying to support the official myth of fire-induced collapses, Frank Greening, changed his mind.

    There must have been a reason why he supported it for so long.

    Blackmail? Threats against family?

    Stuff - not even small stuff - does not fly at high speed upwards or sidewards without a countervailing force which could only be explosives in this case.

    When we studied structural engineering, our professor told us that when the tiniest fly lands on even the biggest girder, the girder must yield an infinitesimally small distance to counteract the weight of the insect with an equal and opposite force. Otherwise, the insect would fall through the girder.

    All of this is blatantly obvious to any trained engineer.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    , @dimples
    @Kevin Barrett

    "The full story of “where were the fighter jets” is actually even more incriminating now than it appeared when The New Pearl Harbor came out in 2004."

    You have a wonderful forum here to explain the details of the fighter jet story here on Unz. Please enlighten us in one of your talks, or at least provide a reference.

    I was not aware that Frank Greening had changed his mind on the collapse of WTC7. So this is good news to hear. I am afraid I have not looked at all this 911 stuff for many years and due to computer and house moves it is difficult to lay my hands on my disorganised files.

    I will try to look up references to the fighter jets to either confirm or deny my comment.

    Replies: @dimples

  • In 2018, the publication of Albert Einstein’s travel diaries was greeted by newspaper headlines lamenting his politically incorrect views of Asians, particularly the Chinese. Most egregious was Einstein’s verdict on Chinese women, “I noticed how little difference there is between men and women; I don’t understand what kind of fatal attraction Chinese women possess that...
  • @Linh Dinh
    @Wizard of Oz

    Irgun operations in 1937-38:

    1937, March-- 2 Arabs killed on Bat Yam beach.
    1937, November 14-- 10 Arabs killed by Irgun units launching attacks around Jerusalem, ("Black Sunday")
    1938, April 12-- 2 Arabs and 2 British policemen were killed by a bomb in a train in Haifa.
    1938, April 17-- 1 Arab was killed by a bomb detonated in a cafe in Haifa
    1938, May 17-- 1 Arab policeman was killed in an attack on a bus in the Jerusalem-Hebron road.
    1938, May 24-- 3 Arabs were shot and killed in Haifa.
    1938, June 19-- 18 Arabs killed (9 men, 6 women and 3 children), 24 injured by a bomb that was thrown into a crowded Arab market place in Haifa.
    1938, June 23-- 2 Arabs were killed near Tel Aviv.
    1938, June 26-- 7 Arabs were killed by a bomb in Jaffa.
    1938, June 27-- 1 Arab was killed in the yard of a hospital in Haifa.
    1938, July 5-- 7 Arabs were killed in several shooting attacks in Tel Aviv.
    1938, July 5-- 3 Arabs were killed by a bomb detonated in a bus in Jerusalem.
    1938, July 5-- 1 Arab was killed in another attack in Jerusalem.
    1938, July 6-- 18 Arabs and 5 Jews were killed by two simultaneous bombs in the Arab melon market in Haifa. More than 60 people were wounded. The toll over two days of riots and reprisals was 33 dead, 111 wounded.
    1938, July 8-- 4 Arabs were killed by a bomb in Jerusalem.
    1938, July 16-- 10 Arabs were killed by a bomb at a marketplace in Jerusalem.
    1938, July 25-- 43 Arabs were killed by a bomb at a marketplace in Haifa.
    1938, August 26-- 24 Arabs were killed by a bomb at a marketplace in Jaffa.

    Replies: @Wally, @barr, @Wizard of Oz, @Colin Wright, @Kevin Barrett, @AnonStarter

    The full story (most of it anyway) is told in State of Terror: How Terrorism Created Modern Israel by Thomas Suarez. From my review:

    “Suarez’s meticulously researched volume shows that almost from the moment Zionists set foot in Palestine they began wantonly murdering and maiming people in service to their plan to empty the land of its inhabitants. Though the great majority of their victims have been Palestinians, the Zionists also slaughtered Europeans, Americans, non-Palestinian Arabs, and even their fellow Jews.”

    https://crescent.icit-digital.org/articles/book-exposes-history-of-zionist-terrorism

    • Replies: @AnonStarter
    @Kevin Barrett

    Kevin,

    On Amazon, the Kindle edition is unavailable for purchase. Do you know why this is?

  • David Icke’s new book The Trigger really triggers some people…like The Washington Post‘s passive-aggressive book reviewer Ron Charles, who brags, shedding crocodile tears all the while: “I banned a book. Or at least I helped get it banned, which makes Banned Books Week a little awkward for me this year.” When Charles saw that Barnes...
  • @Alfred
    @Kevin Barrett

    The most prominent independent scientist who spent years trying to support the official myth of fire-induced collapses, Frank Greening, changed his mind.

    There must have been a reason why he supported it for so long.

    Blackmail? Threats against family?

    Stuff - not even small stuff - does not fly at high speed upwards or sidewards without a countervailing force which could only be explosives in this case.

    When we studied structural engineering, our professor told us that when the tiniest fly lands on even the biggest girder, the girder must yield an infinitesimally small distance to counteract the weight of the insect with an equal and opposite force. Otherwise, the insect would fall through the girder.

    All of this is blatantly obvious to any trained engineer.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Frank Greening was probably too busy looking at the trees with a microscope to notice the forest. And he was playing devil’s advocate, taking his best shot at shooting down the controlled demolition hypothesis. That’s my best guess at how he was able to spend several years avoiding the obvious truth. Likewise, people in denial sometimes experience cognitive dissonance regarding a family member who is a sexual predator or serial killer; it can take years to face up to reality.

  • Steve Penfield is the author of Student Debt Cancellation: A Good Idea and a Political Hoax. In it he argues against standard left vs. right, Democrat vs. Republican arguments—and offers this key insight: “An inescapable consequence to any responsible Debt Forgiveness plan is that someone will have to pay. As Michael Hudson says: ‘You can’t...
  • @Mark Raven
    Again, this ever-present notion that when banks are penalized, bankers reach into their own pockets to pay the fines. Sorry about that little fantasy. It's our pockets they reach into. Stakeholders, depositors, borrowers, just about everyone pays. Sort of like taxes under another name.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Fractional reserve lending is fraud. The obvious solution is to prosecute the bankers, seize their ill-gotten assets, and reconstitute the currency system to ensure that only the Treasury Department is authorized to create money, as ordained by the Constitution. Private individuals and banks may lend, but they cannot be allowed to commit fraud by lending more than they possess.

    • Agree: Enemy of Earth, Tusk
  • @Steve Penfield
    Kevin is right: Fractional reserve lending is fraud. Any politician talking about "Debt Forgiveness" but failing to address the toxic "fracking" of the glorified coin-clippers is just blowing smoke.

    Regarding comment #5, the only "scapegoating" I see is assigning 100% of the blame to students. Let's not forget that it was ADULTS (bankers, colleges, State Boards of Ed., corporate HR staff) that made college mandatory over the last few decades. If kids wanted a professional job, they were FORCED to get an overpriced college degree. That's not a free choice. That's not a valid contract.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    I’m glad we all agree fractional reserve lending is fraud. Here’s a more controversial claim: Usury is also fraud. Ezra Pound and the prophets (not necessarily in that order) were right. Money is by definition a medium of exchange, not a commodity. Renting it out as a commodity is a kind of fraud.

    Financial crimes such as fraud and theft involve an attempt to get something for nothing in a way that disadvantages the other party to the transaction. Using money to make more money without doing productive work is likewise parasitism and theft.

    • Replies: @Steve Penfield
    @Kevin Barrett

    Good points. I agree, coin-clippers produce nothing. Ditto for all money lenders. Nullifying that overgrown racket with an occasional Debt Cancellation seems reasonable to me.

  • Mr. Rho of Revolution.Radio, joins us to talk about Nitehawk, the founder of our network, who passed away Wednesday September 25. Then activist/filmmaker Ken Jenkins comes on to discuss logical fallacies that creep into discussions of 9/11 including: The ad-hominem fallacy, including blaming/demonizing/scapegoating; anchoring; confirmation bias; and more. (For a broader discussion of psychological issues...
  • @jack daniels
    I don't think it's helpful to talk about why people are unreceptive when lots of people are clearly receptive. Put your energy into making your case airtight. The motives of people who oppose you is a boring subject.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    This interview doesn’t focus on why people aren’t receptive to 9/11 truth, but on impediments to clear and accurate thinking that affect everyone—including 9/11 truth supporters—on all kinds of issues.

  • First hour: Charles Upton, renowned Beat poet turned Sufi Muslim interfaith activist, writes in his new essay “Rebuilding Muhammad’s Interfaith Alliance Against the Global Attack on Religion“: “We are all aware of the growing number of attacks on churches, mosques and synagogues around the world, including North America. Whatever attacks are not carried out by...
  • @G. Poulin
    What do you suppose the chances are that many Muslims will pay the slightest attention to these two white guys?

    Replies: @godfree, @Kevin Barrett

    Muslims are widely and fairly equally distributed among most of the biggest ethnic groups on earth, including Malaysians/Indonesians, South Asians, East Asians, Central Asians and Turkic peoples, Indian Subcontinent peoples, Persians, Russians, Eastern Europeans, North Africans, East Africans, West Africans, and increasingly people of northwestern European descent like Charles and me. “White guys” (including white people from native white Muslim backgrounds like Eddie Redzovic of The Deen Show https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/09/10/when-will-muslims-demand-9-11-truth/ ) far from being ignored by other Muslims get an unusually warm welcome wherever we go. Convert to Islam and see for yourself!

    • Replies: @Talha
    @Kevin Barrett


    far from being ignored by other Muslims get an unusually warm welcome wherever we go.
     
    I agree here. I don't know if you've had a chance to hear about this new project by Br. Peter Sanders who was allowed to photograph people in the Muslim world that usuallly avoid photographs:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jr8NLb4JGF4

    I am avidly awaiting his compendium of photographs once it comes out. I believe the work will be a bit on the expensive side, but well worth it. One place you can pre-order is here:
    https://www.meccabooks.com/1678-meetings-with-mountains-9780955710612.html

    Wa salaam.
  • In 2003 I published a book charting America’s decline in thirty-six social and economic indicators. I mailed copies to the Administration, Congress and department heads and received one reply, from the Director General of the Central Intelligence Agency, saying that the Agency had been providing almost identical information to the government for decades. Since then...
  • What should we do then?

    “We” (US) should drop the Global Domination Project and instead promote multipolar balance in Eurasia. China will inevitably become the strongest pole. The key US imperative will be to limit China’s dominance of Eurasia (and by extension the world). How? By helping strengthen non-Chinese entities.

    Where to start? Strengthen the weakest entity, Dar al-Islam. Expose the 9/11 false flag that launched a phony counterproductive war on Islam for Israel. Use sympathy for the 27 million Muslims killed in the $7 trillion 9/11 wars to turn public opinion 180 degrees. Get out of the way and let the Muslim-majority lands unify into one or more Muslim superstates, as a strong majority of the population in those lands desires. Then support the new Muslim superstate(s) as a strategic counterweight to China (and Russia, Europe, and India).

    China’s persecution of Muslims could help open the door to a US-Islamic alliance promoting a peaceful, balanced multipolar world.

    • Replies: @Godfree Roberts
    @Kevin Barrett

    The only people who accuse China of persecuting Muslims and the people who are currently bombing Muslims: NATO.

    Actual Muslims–dozens of whom have inspected Xinjiang and the facilities in question, praise them.

    That is why you hear zero criticism of China's Xinjiang policies from actual Muslims.

    Gökhan Karakaş, a reporter for Turkish daily Milliyet who visited Xinjiang in person last July, “Walking in the streets in Xinjiang, we can feel local residents live a stable and happy life. What impressed me most is that many Uighur dance in the streets at night and they were happy as they like.”

    "The vocational education and training centers in Xinjiang are not 'concentration camps' as described by some Western media, but schools to help those influenced by extreme thoughts to eliminate the harmful thoughts and learn vocational skills," said Leela Mani Paudyal, the Nepalese ambassador to China, during the visit.

    "Every student I saw here is happy. They learn not only laws and regulations, Standard Chinese, but also professional skills, which I believe will give them an edge to adapt to the society after graduation and become a strong competitor in the job market," said the ambassador.

    Karunasena Kodituwakku, Sri Lanka's ambassador to China, said the education and training centers provide a "platform to eradicate extremism," which is beneficial to the trainees and the stability and development of the society as a whole. "This anti-terrorism example is worthy of learning by many countries," he said.

    Here's a full report from one of the most prominent Muslim women in the world: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/pakistan/no-cultural-religious-repression-of-uighur-muslims-in-xinjiang-pakistan-diplomat/articleshow/67675590.cms

    Replies: @John Arthur, @Biff, @Iris

    , @denk
    @Kevin Barrett


    *The key US imperative will be to limit China’s dominance of Eurasia (and by extension the world). How? By helping strengthen non-Chinese entities.

    Where to start? Strengthen the weakest entity, Dar al-Islam.*
     
    Been there, done that.
    What do you think BUsh, Clintons, obama, Trump have been doing all these years ?

    If you cant beat them, send in the jackals...

    Exhibit 6
    Terror in Afpak...

    *An anti-American Islamic fanatic is arrested in Afghanistan, flown to Guantanamo Bay and then released back to Afghan authorities. He’s supposedly seething with anti-Americanism. But after crossing the border and returning to Pakistan, his first mission is to kidnap and kill a Chinese engineer.In doing so, Abdullah Mehsud also becomes the first Pakistani to kill a Chinese citizen on Pakistani soil in a high profile case, creating an unfortunate precedent in the sixty-year long history of close Sino-Pak ties.Mehsud was anti-American. Or was he? We haven’t seen him target any high or low profile American assets since the famous 2004 kidnappings*
     
    http://advocateyousuf.blogspot.com/2007/07/sino-american-turf-battle-in-pakistan.html
  • Ron Rattner of SillySutras.com writes: “Though I began this lifetime only praying rarely in organized religious programs, after years of evolutionary process I now instinctively pray constantly and spontaneously, with an unprecedented and all encompassing concept of ‘prayer’.” Ron Rattner was brought up as a secular Jew, and became a mystic after a midlife crisis...
  • @Kratoklastes
    Prayer - in the normal usage of the word - is just a manifestation of a psychological need for there to be some external force that will intercede to alter the pray-er's timeline.

    To the extent that it furnishes a psychological placebo ('comfort'[1]), it is still a 2-edged sword; it could placebo the individual into changing things themselves, or it could placebo them into thinking that their favourite superhero will save the day so they needn't do anything.

    Mantras are OK: my favourite mantra when things aren't working as expected is "Oh, for fuck's sake". But I have no expectation that a sky wizard will intercede to make MATLAB's table functionality less retarded, or stop me from forgetting to put a fucking line terminator at the end of every line. (as always, the solution to both of those problems is Python: sometimes that's not an option for legacy considerations).


    [1] Why would prayer furnish 'comfort'? Anyone who carefully tabulated the results would notice immediately that the outcome of prayer is exactly in line with the probability distribution of the thing being prayed for. Pray for the will to behave yourself (until the next prayer for the same thing) - sure.

    Pray for little Billy's amputated leg to grow back, or granny's Alxheimers to abate, or someone's pancreatic cancer to fuck off? Sorry, sport: your imaginary friend can't help.

    Replies: @getaclue, @Kevin Barrett

    There is actually a fairly extensive literature of controlled experimentation by non-religious-believers showing that prayer works. In some of these experiments, the people being prayed for didn’t know they were being prayed for, yet their outcomes were better than those who for whom no prayers were offered.

    I learned about this literature from my atheist/agnostic M.D.-Ph.D. brother who makes a living getting grants for double blind medical experiments on such issues as does echinacea help the common cold, etc. He is highly skeptical of all such claims. (He ran a big experiment that found no evidence that echinacea helps colds.) He was impressed by the scientific literature on the efficacy of prayer. His position was that according to the science, prayer does seem to work, but we don’t know how or why.

  • Why would Amazon ban a book called Who Did 9/11? Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, a history of science Ph.D. with a specialty in chemistry, is the author of many books, including: *The best book on the 7/7 London bombings, Terror on the Tube. (Watch the 7/7 video Kollerstrom and Farrell Are Dead.) *Breaking the Spell, which...
  • @Anon

    Anti-universal-monotheism ideologies, which might be termed the ideologies of Antichrist, include atheism, Satanism, humanism, materialism, and at least some varieties of Judaism. Extremist believers in these ideologies have long colluded to wage covert war against Christianity and Islam under the banner of freemasonry.
     
    Any of us, based on their knowledge and experience of humankind, can imagine what, and how, someone who can wrote the above would ban, and, contingently, decide how much weight to give to same someone's complaints about book-banning (certainly not as extensive as the book-banning they would do if they had the chance).

    Same as to the legal lynching of "truth seekers" (seeking in the way they like the truths they like, arguably. They'd legally classify the truth seekings not to their tastes as Antichristisms, and outlaw all of them if they had the chance; or not?).

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Wrong. Prophetic truth, the message of universal monotheism, is generally upheld by persecuted minorities, sometimes minorities of one, who neither wish nor have the power to ban anything. It is the Grand Inquisitors (whatever their nominal ideology) not the Christ who ban books.

  • Part 1: Tuesday at the Trial: Just the Facts Lenny Pozner’s defamation suit against Jim Fetzer concluded Tuesday, October 15, day two of the penalty phase of the trial. (Disclaimer: I have been friends with Jim since 2006, and though I don’t always agree with him, I respect his courage and sincerity. It was an...
  • @Jett Rucker

    I think we should be very careful about asserting or insinuating
     
    Otherwise stated: We should censor ourselves.

    Tell us why, Kevin. Because we might be sued, and lose?

    Please do tell us why, even if you've already told us, tell us again. Specifically.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    It isn’t just the possibility of getting sued that should make us cautious about “nobody died” assertions. It’s the PR nightmare. The “nobody died” approach has handed the MSM the ultimate weapon in its anti-conspiracy-theory campaign: Depict all “conspiracy theorists” as insensitive louts who enjoy torturing poor grieving parents.

    My colleagues in the Veterans Today editorial department think the bad guys dangled fabricated “nobody died” clues to lure people like Jim Fetzer down the wrong rabbit hole in order to discredit and take down all “conspiracy theorists.” Now THAT’S a conspiracy theory! And it might well be true.

    • Replies: @utu
    @Kevin Barrett

    "...to lure people like Jim Fetzer..." - What if he was not lured? What if Fetzer is a part of the conspiracy who does luring others?

    Replies: @onebornfree, @Iris, @bjondo, @Kevin Barrett

    , @Hippopotamusdrome
    @Kevin Barrett

    But, like, what if nobody actually died?

    , @eah
    @Kevin Barrett

    Depict all “conspiracy theorists” as insensitive louts who enjoy torturing poor grieving parents.

    Except the claim that saying "no one died" is "torturing poor grieving parents" should be dismissed by people who really do believe in the First Amendment -- it is absurd to suggest that what can and cannot be said should be controlled by how someone might react to it emotionally.

    fabricated “nobody died” clues

    What are those exactly? -- these "fabricated 'nobody died' clues"? -- in the estimation of many, Robbie Parker, speaking on CNN little more than a day after his daughter was (allegedly) shot to death, did not really look like a 'grieving parent' -- was that one of the "fabricated 'nobody died' clues"?

    , @Jonathan Revusky
    @Kevin Barrett


    The “nobody died” approach has handed the MSM the ultimate weapon in its anti-conspiracy-theory campaign: Depict all “conspiracy theorists” as insensitive louts who enjoy torturing poor grieving parents.

     

    Hmm. It's interesting how you (though it's not only you) miss the key point here. And that is this:

    The Sandy Hook hoax is a case with a certain special characteristic. Most of the (alleged) victims were little children, six or seven years old. The basic problem there is with phony victims in these hoaxes is that you have people with zero life history, except... it is perfectly normal that a six-year-old has about zero life history!

    In some recent private correspondence, somebody asked me whether I was worried that, based on my Betty Ong work, or the more recent article I wrote about a couple of Japanese phony victims something like what happened to Fetzer could be done to me. I answered that I was really quite confident that this would not happen. Why? Because the phony victims I'm writing about are people in their 30's and 40's and it's just too obvious on any close inspection that these are phonies!

    However, again, when the purported victim is a six-year-old child, the same things that are so glaring in the case of (fake) adult victims, are not really suspicious. (Like, of course a six-year-old has no employment history! Of course a six-year-old has no footprint on social media! Etc. etc.)

    It is my considered view that this sort of (alleged) victim, little children, as we have here in the Sandy Hook case is about the only scenario where they could pull this off -- I mean, what they did to Fetzer.

    In retrospect, making a big deal out of Sandy Hook, as opposed to the other cases in which the victims are all adults, would seem to be a pretty major blunder. But, well, okay, we're all human and we all make mistakes. IMHO, the real moral of the story is that truth oriented people have to really stop being such egotistical one-man shows and put our heads together and think things through. One could still fall into traps but the likelihood would be quite a bit lower, I think.

    But, as for this Sandy Hook/Fetzer situation, there is a problem now of drawing the wrong conclusions from this. The problem is not so much pointing out that fake victims are fake (which, IMO, is absolutely necessary!) but rather, choosing your spots carefully, and not choosing a case where the fake victim is a six-year-old child!

    When the fake victim is a 45-year-old, like Betty Ong, then you can be in a much stronger position, like: "Bring it on." (to quote George W. Bush)

    Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome, @Hippopotamusdrome

    , @Anon
    @Kevin Barrett

    What were the clues that might have been dangled to catch out the simpletons like Fetzer? By whom and in what media do you suggest?

  • @animalogic
    I've never really been comfortable with "truth" as an absolute defence in libel claims. The finding of truth should be a defence conditioned upon the intent of the expression of that truth. If the clear intent of such an expression was to damage a person's reputation or to cause pain, financial lose etc, these findings should have some bearing on a "truth" defence.

    Replies: @Lol, @Kevin Barrett, @John Howard

    Re: “If the clear intent of such an expression (of something truthful) was to damage a person’s reputation or to cause pain, financial lose etc, these findings should have some bearing on a ‘truth’ defence.”

    Let’s apply that approach to Pozner vs. Fetzer. Fetzer believes he is telling the truth about Sandy Hook. He sincerely views himself as a disinterested truth-seeker. He has absolutely no intent to cause any kind of pain or financial loss to Pozner. Whereas Pozner, it could be easily argued, is so angry (perhaps understandably) that he is very much out to cause pain and financial loss to Fetzer.

    So under your standard, even if Pozner is telling the truth (he lost his son, Sandy Hook happened more or less as advertised) he’s potentially guilty of a tort simply for seeking to punish Fetzer for spreading false and defamatory information. Even if Pozner were right in saying “Fetzer, you’re a total asshole for publishing these lies about me, I want to humiliate you and take your money” he would be guilty of a tort, simply for wanting to damage Fetzer, if we set aside the issue of truth.

    Obviously truth is, and must be, an absolute defense against libel. Libel victims must show that the libel they suffered not only was false, but that the perpetrator knew or should have known it was false. My objection to the Pozner-vs.-Fetzer trial was that Fetzer was not given a reasonable opportunity to present his reasons for believing that his allegedly libelous statements were in fact truthful.

    As for those who use truthful information against others in unacceptable ways, that would be harassment, not libel.

    • Replies: @animalogic
    @Kevin Barrett

    My comment was not in reference to the case under consideration.
    Your views are an accurate reflection of the Law as it stands. I simply have some doubts as to "truth" being a complete defence. The "truth",when it deals with the written word is very slippery. And, yes, so is "intent" slippery. It's only an opinion, one which you & many others no doubt, disagree with.

    , @James Forrrestal
    @Kevin Barrett

    He appears to be referring to a concept known as "lashon hara", which is entirely foreign to the Anglo-American tradition.

    See also "mesirah."

  • Why would Amazon ban a book called Who Did 9/11? Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, a history of science Ph.D. with a specialty in chemistry, is the author of many books, including: *The best book on the 7/7 London bombings, Terror on the Tube. (Watch the 7/7 video Kollerstrom and Farrell Are Dead.) *Breaking the Spell, which...
  • @BlackDragon
    Kevin, Have a 911 truth conference instead of BRICS, with the SCO countries. Have it in Shanghai!!! See what they could do about that.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    That’s a great idea. Do you know any Chinese truther billionaires who could sponsor a 9/11 conference there?

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    @Kevin Barrett

    Oh, yeah. There must be dozens of Chinese truther billionaires milling around. ;-)

  • @Anon
    [Ifollow-up to comment #12]

    You owe me no answer, Barrett. Ask yourself, if you want, whether someone who sees everyone with a worldview different from his own as "pro-evil", if he had the chance, would ban less or more cultural content than is being banned in these years by our rulers.
    I think, more. In fact, where monotheistic religions folks have the power to do it, don't they ban much more?

    You may examine the issue, and come to your own conclusions about it.

    I am posting this, mainly, to apologize for the confrontational tone of my previous comment. I don't believe in confrontation.
    Just it is a bit dizzying to be an average moral person with an interest in understanding reality (it could be a humanist, an atheist, and so on) and being accused that way. I can easily imagine that, for many who do not believe in the divine origin and mission of Christ, he was still a heroic, or at least very likeable, person; I know plenty of atheists or materialists who admire Christ while believing he was not more than a human.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    When I listed the constellation of related ideologies that I consider mistaken, singling out extremist believers in those ideologies, I certainly wasn’t suggesting that any such believers, moderate or extremist, should be censored.

    Whereas there seems to be widespread agreement among much of the atheist-humanist managerial class in the West, and perhaps in Russia, India, and China as well, that “radical Muslims” and other “religious extremists” do need to be censored, and their views suppressed.

    Many of my best friends, not to mention family members, are humanists, atheists, agnostics, etc. Like everyone else they are struggling with various good and evil impulses. There is a connection between a person’s worldview and the state of their soul, but it isn’t straightforward and simple. The best depiction of that connection is in Dostoevsky’s later novels.

  • Part 1: Tuesday at the Trial: Just the Facts Lenny Pozner’s defamation suit against Jim Fetzer concluded Tuesday, October 15, day two of the penalty phase of the trial. (Disclaimer: I have been friends with Jim since 2006, and though I don’t always agree with him, I respect his courage and sincerity. It was an...
  • @utu
    @Kevin Barrett

    "...to lure people like Jim Fetzer..." - What if he was not lured? What if Fetzer is a part of the conspiracy who does luring others?

    Replies: @onebornfree, @Iris, @bjondo, @Kevin Barrett

    God knows Jim Fetzer has his faults, but lack of sincerity is not one of them. I am pretty sure that nobody who actually knows him doubts his good faith.

  • There was what might be described as an extraordinary amount of nonsense being promoted by last week’s media. Unfortunately, some of it was quite dangerous. Admiral William McRaven, who commanded the Navy Seals when Osama bin Laden was captured and killed and who has been riding that horse ever since, announced that if Donald Trump...
  • “…killing possibly as many as 4 million mostly Muslims.”

    Change that to 27 million.

    https://www.patreon.com/posts/gideon-polya-on-14190770

    • Troll: Mike Tre
  • First hour: Radio host, journalist and publisher Dave Gahary was featured today in a CBS News Good Morning report on the Wisconsin court decision ordering Jim Fetzer to pay Lenny Pozner $450,000 in libel damages. (I was in the courtroom Tuesday and published this report.) Dave, the publisher of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, decided...
  • @onebornfree
    Dave Gahary says:"..the judge ruled for Pozner, that he was defamed by the book claiming the death certificate was a fraud, and that Noah Pozner did not die, and that Lenny Pozner does not exist."

    So Fetzer does not first have a [state] constitutional right to make these claims, and others, in good faith, in a book ? Is that what you are saying?

    Regards, onebornfree

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Obviously Jim Fetzer did make his seemingly outrageous claims in good faith. But although truth is an absolute defense against libel, simply believing that you are telling the truth (good faith) is not.

    That is why the court needed to determine, rather than just assume, what the truth actually is. To do that would require a robust adversarial process in which both sides have plenty of scope to argue their case. Unfortunately Jim wasn’t given a chance to argue that his claims are true, so the result, however “correct” it may be, is unsatisfying.

    Lenny Pozner should be the most dissatisfied party of all. He says his motive, indeed his whole mission in life, is to put the conspiracy theories to rest. So he should have insisted that Fetzer have plenty of opportunity to make his case using deposition and discovery, expert testimony, and so on. In other words, give him enough rope to hang himself! Had that happened, it’s likely that Fetzer himself, faced with overwhelming evidence that he is wrong, would have recanted; and it’s even more likely that the Sandy Hook conspiracy movement would have been largely eliminated. Instead, the lack of balance in the courtroom left the empirical questions unresolved, and made Jim look like a martyr (at least to those predisposed to favor free speech and/or Sandy Hook conspiracy theories).

  • I recently emailed Dane Wiggington of Geoengineering Watch to ask his take on weird weather patterns etc. Dane wrote back: “Hello, Kevin, hope you are well in spite of it all. Biosphere collapse continues to unfold and accelerate, the climate engineering assault is further fueling the process (and contaminating every breath we take).” Dane claims...
  • @anon
    Chemtrail cranks are highly amusing to every pilot who calculates a Weight & Balance, because he knows exactly how much mass of whatever chemtrail chemical is on his aircraft at Take Off Weight: zero.

    https://i.imgur.com/BL8u7lD.png

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    In 2006 I spoke extensively and in person with a mainstream journalist who rejected all “conspiracy theories” except one: chemtrails. He had investigated them for an Indiana MSM outfit. He said he spoke to military pilots and others involved in two separate programs: One is an experimental program exploring the possibility of spraying “sunscreen” to slow global warming; the other involves spraying nano size metallic particles for use in a military imaging system.

    I don’t know whether he was telling the truth, but he sure sounded credible. If he was right, the military pilots spraying such stuff obviously know what they’re taking off with.

    • Replies: @🙈RetroTrump2009
    @Kevin Barrett

    Yes, there are a few experiments done as you mention, and cloud seeding for rain-making has been done for decades, but the materials in those experiments do not necessarily cause contrails. 100% of the contrails you see are condensation trails, the same observed since WWII. If the aircraft is spraying some experimental chemical or material, you wouldn't know it.

    The whole "chemtrail" thing is 100% pure malarkey, and your last sentence lights the path about how you too can learn that to your own satisfaction. "The military pilots spraying such stuff obviously know what they’re taking off with." Exactly! Such experimental material will be listed on a Weight & Balance calculation. The aircraft will be fitted inside with whatever containers are necessary to perform the experiments. It'll be really heavy, and doesn't fit magically in a normal jetliner.

    So keeping your last sentence in mind, go make friends with your friendly (or sometimes arrogant) neighborhood airline pilot, and ask him how many pounds (or kilos) of chemtrail chemical they're loading onto his aircraft. He's going to say "zero." Then he's going to laugh, because the airlines are getting so stingy on weight that they don't even want him carrying extra fuel for emergencies than that legally required. The seats are getting thinner to save weight. They're printing in flight magazines with thinner paper stock to save just one ounce of weight. Really! Airliners don't have room for a single ounce of Trail Chem.

    Global warming is a result of our own CO2 emissions. The science is two centuries old and very simple to understand. It can be demonstrated on your kitchen table with junk you already have, a couple 2L soda bottles and thermometers, a heat lamp, and a few Alka Seltzer.

    🙈RetroTrump2009
    https://tinyurl.com/AlarmistTrump

    Replies: @Greg Bacon

    , @🙉RetroTrump2009
    @Kevin Barrett

    The movie you recommended, Chasing Ice, is excellent. It was quite the feet to get that film! It's a wonder he's alive.

    And it's available to watch for free on youtube:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsEcP2qz5iA

    Again, thank you; I greatly enjoyed it. -🙉RetroTrump2009

    , @IT'S ME
    @Kevin Barrett

    FOR KEVIN and anybody else who is interested - Take your time and read carefully ! http://www.journaljgeesi.com/index.php/JGEESI/article/view/30157/56595

  • I have been mulling over the ideas in this article since early 2016, when they crystallized in more or less their current form. I am not quite sure whether these ideas are rather important, or the ravings of a lunatic. But I am certainly glad to be able to finally unload them from the confines...
  • @Si1ver1ock
    I'm going with the Bob Lazar story. It seems like credible, direct first hand eye-witness testimony.



    There are aliens, several different species. They probably communicate by quantum entanglement, which is why we don't get radio signals.

    Humanity is probably a genetically created servant race, which left on its own, has gone to seed.

    There is probably some kind of exo-politics going on in which the Earth is a piece of someone else's empire and gets traded around and maybe fought over.

    The Earth is an island oasis in a sea of space. Some aliens stop by Earth the way ancient mariners used to stopped by islands, to restock on food and water, walk around breathe some fresh air.

    The U.S. military has what Bob Lazar called the Government Bible. This gives it a knowledge base not available tot he general public. You can find it at approx: 31:30 in the following video.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALeJk2_NNLI

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    This topic is plagued by so many Rumsfeldian “unknown unknowns” that any given interpretation has only a small probability of being remotely correct. That said, the most plausible interpretation of the material covered in Richard Dolan’s UFOs and the National Security State is that Earth is visited and surveilled by ET and/or extradimensional entities, and that this fact has been intentionally obscured by one or more disinformation programs.

    Presumably the visitors are no more interested in communicating with radio waves, or traveling by rocket, than New Yorkers are interested in communicating with New Jersey using smoke signals or visiting Tokyo in dugout canoes. So much for the Fermi Paradox.

    A few years ago I interviewed former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer, who claims that Earth is a busy crossroads for a wide variety of advanced intelligent life forms. If we overthrow the predatory bankster cabal, he says, the dominant (and relatively benign) Cosmic Federation will rescind their quarantine.

    https://noliesradio.org/archives/93985

    • LOL: iffen
    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    @Kevin Barrett

    Laugh . . .


    Though in defense of Sec Rumsfeld . . . on this subject he is probably more accurate in his assessments because in the case of invasions, there was a lot we knew and could confidently assess.

    As for government conspiracies --- i am unconvinced that they are capable of keeping something this broad and weildly a secret.

    ---------------------------------

    "“If aliens were able to visit Earth, that would mean they would have technological capabilities sophisticated enough not to need slaves, food or other planets,” she added."

    In response to the above and the views of Dr. Stephen Hawking, we simply don't know.

    Replies: @Justvisiting

  • First half hour: Donald Trump says the purpose of the US military is to defend our borders—not police the world. If he really believes that, he should slash military spending at least 50%! Guest Dave Lindorff writes in his new article “Military Spending’s Out of Control While Slashing It Could Easily Fund Medicare for All”:...
  • @Henry Sulla
    If you make the mission of the military to defend America only, of course you can rationally cut the military budget by 50% and still outspend any rival. However, as Smedley Butler accurately said, "War is a Racket" and we would have to find a way to overcome the racketeers who control everything.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Too bad we don’t have a modern-day Smedley who could declare war on the racketeers. Why waste time on phony “terrorists” when you could send the same special forces teams to rendition the Rothschilds.

  • Former Libertarian Party VP Candidate and mayor of Bellflower, California Art Olivier discusses apocalyptic expectations and predictions. When will the world end, and how? Tune in and find out. Spoiler: Art espouses a version of the Niburu/Planet X theory, according to which an eccentric planet or black hole weighing in at about 10 times the...
  • I’m left wondering when anyone has ever predicted the future with a convincing degree of accuracy, without relying on an acrane symbology devoid of concrete specifics and thereby open to any number of rationalized, ex post facto reconciliations with interim events. The more any such prediction relies on a linear projection from empirical data, the more it diverges in principle from the non-linear reality that we call life. On the other hand, a straight line can also end up intersecting a squiggly, indeterminate curve here and there. And when it does, we’ll know, though most likely not before then.

    Which brings us to models based on probability. But while the concept of “probability” may be useful in helping us navigate what we imagine might be the future, it nevertheless remains a human concept, without any counterpart in the world of objective reality. In that latter world, something either happens or it doesn’t, and there’s no cigar left for “probably” to get a consolation prize.

    Then again, engaging in predictions can be as entertaining a pastime as many others, so why not let loose a flurry of them and see which one hits the jackpot, while knowing full well that the odds are on the house.

    • Agree: Kevin Barrett
  • Dr. Cynthia McKinney got elected to Congress six times—and soon found herself under attack by the Israel lobby when she refused to sign the “pledge of allegiance to Israel” demanded of all representatives! The Lobby was able to eject Rep. McKinney from Congress twice, once in 2002 and again in 2006, by fabricating a primary...
  • @SolontoCroesus
    How sad and foolish to hear Dr. McKinney buy into the white privilege narrative.

    Does she think that all those Irishmen and Germans who got sucked into- and killed in Jewish wars for the unique benefit of Jews are beneficiaries of White Privilege?

    USA whites are British, German, Irish, Italian, Slavic & other.
    How many of these migrated to US well after 1862?
    How many of these were slave owners?
    HOW MANY JEWS WERE SLAVE OWNERS!!

    Stupid strategy, Cynthia.
    Unless, of course, you think the Blacks-as-victims movement is
    a. a grass roots movement and not manipulated by -- wait for it -- Jews;
    and
    b. capable of reforming American society in the Constitutional principles you so vigorously endorse, by dividing whites off from Blacks.

    Replies: @Reality Cheque, @ltravail

    I understand your consternation upon interpreting some of the comments Ms. McKinney makes in this interview with regard to historical relations between white and black Americans as playing the “race-card/white-privilege” thing. I would be highly disappointed in her, too, if I thought that was her main premise. But your blowing her perfunctory comments on historical race relations way out of proportion with respect to the rest (and main parts) of her political commentary. This may be, perhaps, because you’re not very familiar with her political career and experiences. No black politician or celebrity of any note would have dared openly defy Israel and its hasbara ilk in the US by taking part in a flotilla sailing to the middle east to break the illegal Israeli blockade of Gaza (for which, of course, she was captured and held by the Israelis). Those type of black folk exclusively stay in their “race” lane and are unabashedly beholden to Jewish power for whatever prestige and wealth they imagine they possess.

    I’ve always regarded Cynthia McKinney as one of the great political activists of contemporary times. If you know anything of her political career and stances, you will realize that her primary guiding principle has been making material the grand ideals of the US constitution for all Americans (as she asserted in this interview). You will also note that her political career was destroyed for refusing to pledge allegiance to Israel and Jewish zionism – unlike virtually the entirety of her congressional colleagues…black, white, or other. She has militated against the stranglehold that Zionist Jews have on all of our social institutions and the detrimental impact of this power on America and all its peoples. Unlike, say, virtually all members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), “race” politics was never at the core of her political concerns. Her political principles were, and still are, nationalistic and all-inclusive. Her political career went up in flames for standing up to “power” on behalf of the American people (not just blacks). In fact, it was often insinuated that she, as a black politician and woman, to boot, was over-stepping her “bounds” by not simply sticking to “race” matters, as virtually all other black politicians (particularly of the democrat persuasion) do.

    If you listen closely to the discussion, she makes clear that there is nothing more she’d like to see than black and white (and other) Americans coalescing to fight against the Jewish zionists (and their goyim puppets) who have eaten away at the core values of the US constitution and American society from within. But she asks, as she says her black friends remind her, why should blacks throw their lot in with whites that they cannot trust to uphold the principles of mutual respect and dignity between the races in the process of turning back this threat to all Americans who believe in and wish to re-root our society in the ideals of the constitution?

    The question is not without validity. Of course, white immigrants of the 19th and early 20th centuries, by and large, had nothing to do with black slavery. But they did ignite the anti-black Draft Riots of the civil war era. They did indeed vigorously condone and participate in Jim Crow-ism throughout most of the 20th century. And indeed, the Unz review is chock-full of fairly influential writers(at least among a cadre of disaffected whites) that would love nothing more than to see Jim Crow re-instituted in the US! These writers (excepting one or two) will go far out of their way to avoid pointing any fingers at the Jewish zionist element really at the root of the problems they rail against – putting the blame for everything they see wrong entirely on blacks, migrants, queers, etc., instead of on the not-so-hidden puppet masters behind these tectonic disturbances in contemporary America. How cowardly! While Cynthia McKinney has the balls and humanity to point the finger at the real culprits, these cowards wouldn’t dare lift a finger, much less point it in the direction it should be aimed.

    So given all this, why wouldn’t the question of “trust” be a legitimate one? But again, if you heard her out, she asks for and seeks solutions to these historical “trust” issues in order to unite American society and its peoples to fight the cancer devouring the body-politic from the inside out. There is no chance of abating the deterioration without that kind of common understanding as a unifying catalyst. The historical narrative to which Ms. McKinney briefly refers, and which Americans (both black and white) seem so reluctant to distance themselves from, certainly exacerbates the problem. In fact, observing much of the product of the media complex (entertainment and news), and education system, one might even assert that making contemporary that which belongs to a distant place and time is a deliberate vector in the “divide and conquer” strategy we see in effect today. And right now, there is little evidence that Americans are willing and able to overcome themselves to save themselves in that regard.

    Very few are as “woke” as they may think themselves to be. If people were, there might be common understanding of the real threats to our society, and reasonable proposals for dealing with these threats. Any ideas? Cynthia McKinney is searching high and low for answers. So am I.

    • Agree: Kevin Barrett, Durruti
    • Replies: @bjondo
    @ltravail

    The parts I had time to read make sense.
    CM is a brave and honorable person.

    Replies: @Richard B

  • During World War I, seven of the medical schools attached to the University of London decided to start admitting female students, as did Oxford and Edinburgh University. But by 1928, five of these London colleges had decided to stop admitting women, with the other two heavily restricting female numbers. Oxford voted for a ratio of...
  • @RoatanBill
    Since the Humanities and Social Sciences are complete and utter bullshit, they should be eliminated wholesale. That would get rid of the magnet drawing women into the university system as that's largely what they are interested in.

    No one should be able to get a degree in a field that can't prove what it claims. A PhD in something that has no basis in fact is just a doctorate of bullshit.

    Replies: @Realist, @Kevin Barrett

    Not true. Positivism is a symptom of the West’s intellectual decline.

    Yes, there are more mediocrities in the humanities than in the hard sciences, but that’s only because we choose to tolerate them. (And, increasingly, encourage them.) If universities tolerated bad mathematical thinkers the way they tolerate and encourage bad humanities thinkers, we’d have mathematics departments dominated by people who say it’s sexist, racist, and transphobic to deny that two plus two make three.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    @Kevin Barrett

    Not true ? What's not true? Clear intelligible sentences are appreciated.

    Positivism?? I have no idea what that entails. I'm an engineer - EE / CS. Throughout my educational training and my life experience I have no idea what bullshit positivism represents, nor do I care.

    This is more made up nonsense by the fraudulent soft science / humanities / social science / basket weaving crowd. Those folks make up stuff as important as belly button lint and then claim some genius insight that the rest of us that actually produce the real world can't comprehend.

    I read your post several times and have no idea what your point is. I don't speak esoteric gibberish. I always thought Professor Irwin Corey was funny, but you folks take his act to a whole new level.

    Replies: @Intelligent Dasein, @Kevin Barrett

    , @Skeptikal
    @Kevin Barrett

    There is a great deal to be said for this.
    It would be interesting have some statistics on the intellectual output and contributions 0f women graduating from co-educational institutions compared to those from women's-only institutions. Only the best, of course, such as Wellesley, Smith, Mt. Holyoke, Bryn Mawr, etc.

    , @Eurocan
    @Kevin Barrett

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/10/math-racist-university-illinois-professor/

  • @Kevin Barrett
    @RoatanBill

    Not true. Positivism is a symptom of the West's intellectual decline.

    Yes, there are more mediocrities in the humanities than in the hard sciences, but that's only because we choose to tolerate them. (And, increasingly, encourage them.) If universities tolerated bad mathematical thinkers the way they tolerate and encourage bad humanities thinkers, we'd have mathematics departments dominated by people who say it's sexist, racist, and transphobic to deny that two plus two make three.

    Replies: @RoatanBill, @Skeptikal, @Eurocan

    Not true ? What’s not true? Clear intelligible sentences are appreciated.

    Positivism?? I have no idea what that entails. I’m an engineer – EE / CS. Throughout my educational training and my life experience I have no idea what bullshit positivism represents, nor do I care.

    This is more made up nonsense by the fraudulent soft science / humanities / social science / basket weaving crowd. Those folks make up stuff as important as belly button lint and then claim some genius insight that the rest of us that actually produce the real world can’t comprehend.

    I read your post several times and have no idea what your point is. I don’t speak esoteric gibberish. I always thought Professor Irwin Corey was funny, but you folks take his act to a whole new level.

    • Agree: Kevin Barrett
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
    @RoatanBill

    Humanities comprises, among other things, the study of philosophy, fine arts, history, literature, religion, even the higher craft-arts such as architecture and gastronomy. Because its scope is no narrower than the field of all human accomplishment, it takes even mathematics and physics into its orbit and it knows how to honor them appropriately.

    I started out in engineering school myself. The most brilliant professor at my notable college was the man who taught the required freshman humanities course. He knew as much about engineering as any of the engineering profs, but he knew other things besides and could place everything within a higher perspective. His example was instrumental in persuading me to eventually make the shift from engineering to philosophy.

    The cure for bad humanities is good humanities, not no humanities.

    Replies: @RoatanBill, @Counterinsurgency

    , @Kevin Barrett
    @RoatanBill

    You're taking positivism (look it up) to an absurd extreme.

    The Unz Review is obviously a humanities journal. We discuss things like history, philosophy, political science, etc. That's what you're doing right now...not very well, but at least you're trying.

    Replies: @RoatanBill

  • @Intelligent Dasein
    @RoatanBill

    Humanities comprises, among other things, the study of philosophy, fine arts, history, literature, religion, even the higher craft-arts such as architecture and gastronomy. Because its scope is no narrower than the field of all human accomplishment, it takes even mathematics and physics into its orbit and it knows how to honor them appropriately.

    I started out in engineering school myself. The most brilliant professor at my notable college was the man who taught the required freshman humanities course. He knew as much about engineering as any of the engineering profs, but he knew other things besides and could place everything within a higher perspective. His example was instrumental in persuading me to eventually make the shift from engineering to philosophy.

    The cure for bad humanities is good humanities, not no humanities.

    Replies: @RoatanBill, @Counterinsurgency

    My school also had some basket weaving courses like History, Economics, etc. That’s where all the folks that washed out of the engineering curriculum migrated towards.

    I remember taking a forced Economics course and the professor was telling the class that the Vietnam war was good for the economy. I got up called him a horses ass and he threw me out of his class. Good thing was that the dean knew he was a horses ass and allowed me to take an additional math class instead.

    Can you tell me what a philosophy major is good for? If the world had no philosophers, what would happen? I know what would happen if all the engineers disappeared, but I can’t think of a single thing that the world would miss if philosophers vanished except a lot of hot air.

    The Humanities and Social Sciences are fraudulent areas of study as they don’t produce anything that can be empirically tested. It’s a lot of hand waving and trying to get to some consensus among the various story tellers to agree on a line of BS. Just look at Climate Science or Economics to realize that on net these are detrimental to the society because they claim expertise that’s just not there.

    • Agree: Kevin Barrett, HEREDOT
    • Replies: @Flint Clint
    @RoatanBill

    It's funny you say that.

    Humanities and the Liberal Arts used to be without question the elite courses, taken by the highest IQ individuals.

    Engineering was for mongs in the technical facilities who couldn't learn Greek and Latin, and who were unable to read fast enough with sufficient comprehension to get through all of Aristotle, Plato and their successors.

    That was when Universities were inhabited by a geuine intellectual elite. Before they were Judaized.

    Engineering is a subordinate field to Liberal Arts, if each is in it's ideal state.

    As Orwell observed, Engineering can't survive bad philosophy - as we are in the midst of seeing today. The philosophy of equalitarianism leads to bridges that fall down.

    It also can't survive bad history. Remember, a country that had sarin and nerve gas used Zkylon B distributers with doors that opened inwards instead of outwards.

    It also can't survive bad economics - what use is an abundance of engineers if none can get work due to free-market economics with the corrolary of free movement of labour?

    Don't get me wrong - engineering today is vastly superior to the Liberal Arts as you say. It's just sad to see the fall of Western pedagogy. The Liberal Arts were the source of the bases of engineering and the true field of universe building, not just material building.

    It's sad to see.

    Replies: @RoatanBill

  • @RoatanBill
    @Kevin Barrett

    Not true ? What's not true? Clear intelligible sentences are appreciated.

    Positivism?? I have no idea what that entails. I'm an engineer - EE / CS. Throughout my educational training and my life experience I have no idea what bullshit positivism represents, nor do I care.

    This is more made up nonsense by the fraudulent soft science / humanities / social science / basket weaving crowd. Those folks make up stuff as important as belly button lint and then claim some genius insight that the rest of us that actually produce the real world can't comprehend.

    I read your post several times and have no idea what your point is. I don't speak esoteric gibberish. I always thought Professor Irwin Corey was funny, but you folks take his act to a whole new level.

    Replies: @Intelligent Dasein, @Kevin Barrett

    You’re taking positivism (look it up) to an absurd extreme.

    The Unz Review is obviously a humanities journal. We discuss things like history, philosophy, political science, etc. That’s what you’re doing right now…not very well, but at least you’re trying.

    • LOL: Mike P
    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    @Kevin Barrett

    I would be more specific and call the UNZ site a political site. The broader humanities label would be misleading in my OPINION. Anything discussed has a political implication so I see politics as its primary focus.

    Actually, I think I'm doing rather well, as I've managed to get under your skin by stating the unvarnished truth with complete disregard for any hurt feelings the fragile liberal arts folks are noted for.

    If I've improperly characterized or in any way stated a falsehood, please correct me. I've thought about this topic for a very long time as I see it as the chief source of our current and worsening situation. There are too many people with bogus degrees spouting nonsense as though it were fact when all it is is their OPINION.

    It's the imprimatur of the university degree that gives bogus opinions gravitas and I want that to stop. Economics provides the aura of legitimacy to the outright fraud that is Fractional Reserve Banking. Economics is bullshit. The outright fraud of Psychiatry allows Big Pharma to sell potions that destroy peoples minds and leads to the bulk of the mass murders. Billions are spent chasing the phantoms of dark energy, dark matter and other mathematical constructs that have no empirical evidence to back them up all the while a branch of Plasma Physics can explain the phenomena the Cosmologists can't. The list of idiotic adventures is near endless and it's all due to the ability of the university system to produce supposed experts in areas where there are none.

    Handing out bogus degrees in fields that require no empirical evidence is simply wrong.

  • Introduction: a short survey of the cuckoo's nest My initial idea was to begin with a definition of "Islamophobia" but after looking around for various definitions, I decided to use my own, very primitive definition. I will define Islamophobia as the belief that Islam (the religion) and/or Muslims (the adherents to this religion) represent some...
  • “Note that “Allah” is not a name, it is the word “God” and “rasul” can be translated as “prophet”.”

    The word Allah is a name; it is in fact the Supreme Name (Ism Azam). A name is a word after all.

    As for the word ‘rasul’ its meaning is Messenger; the word for Prophet is ‘naby. A Rasul is the vehicle of a Divine Revelation, whereas a Prophet is rather an eminent continuator of the Revelation. The Rasul is the higher rank; there have been relatively few of them in comparison to the multitude of prophets.
    ———————————
    “Was Islam really spread by the sword? Maybe. But anybody making that claim better make darn sure that his/her religion, country or ideology has a much better record. If not, then this is pure hypocrisy!”

    But the statement in question is not merely a subjectivism. It is either a historical truth or not. The “record” of the faith of a person who is of a different faith is irrelevant. A pertinent issue would be to what extent was the faith spread by the sword. This doubtless varied according to place and time. Hypocrisy might come in if there is an element of untruth in a person’s affirmations and opinions, or an element of bad faith or of impassioned bias or prejudice.
    ———————————-
    Comparing Christianity and Islam is a task beyond the Saker in my view. He is doubtless well-intentioned, but essentially he is way over his head, a dilettante.
    ———————————-
    “The Vision of Islam” by Sachiko Murata and Wm. Chittick, is a good intro. to Islam. But the very best and most profound treatment by far is Frithjof Schuon’s “Understanding Islam.” It is a demanding book, to be sure. Martin Lings’ book “Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources”is best biography of Muhammad. There is a wonderful video of Lings’ Pilgrimage to Mecca in 1941:
    Circling the House of God: Martin Lings Narrates His Hajj Journey (The Faith)

    Video Link

    • Agree: Kevin Barrett
    • Replies: @Seraphim
    @Eliseo

    But "audiatur et altera pars".
    I would recommend "Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West", by Raymond Ibrahim, "The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran", by Robert Spencer, and the classic "Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World", by Patricia Crone&Michael Cook. Also, "La Croix et le Croissant. Le christianisme face à l’islam", by Antoine Moussali.

    , @Carroll Price
    @Eliseo

    Islam may or may not have been spread by the sword, while minus the sword, there's no reason to believe Catholicism would have ever spread beyond Italy, France, Spain, and Portugal.

    Replies: @steinbergfeldwitzcohen, @RadicalCenter

    , @Assad al-islam
    @Eliseo


    “Note that “Allah” is not a name, it is the word “God” and “rasul” can be translated as “prophet”.”

    The word Allah is a name; it is in fact the Supreme Name (Ism Azam). A name is a word after all.
     

    Saker is correct that word Allah it is NOT a name. Allah consists of two words, "al" and "ilah" which means, "The God".

    Jews and Christians use the same word, but write it differently in English because of vowels differences in Arabic and English, such as many versions of the name Mohammad in English. Quran and Muslim use ilah in English for God and Jews/Christians use eloh for God in English. Both ilah and eloh are same word, and both can become dual and plural, such as elohim which is a plural of eloh (meaning three or more gods).

    The Jews also use the plural form of elohim for God due to the respect for the Supreme Being. Also, Jews use elohim for gods, but in the first case elohim is used with a singular verb and in the later case elohim is used with plural verb. Such as elohim (God) is walking and elohim (gods) are walking.

    However, the beauty of allah is which is two words, cannot be made plural.

    BTW, both ilah and eloh are feminine nouns. Do you think that God has a gender? And, his gender is feminine?

    Replies: @peterAUS

  • US Americans were ignorant about Islam before the 9/11 false flag. Since 2001 they have been mentally and emotionally crippled by Zionist-inflicted PTSD. This article might help a few recover from their illness. The rest can keep vomiting bloody bile into the comments section.

    The Saker suggests that the main (only?) public-policy-relevant difference between Islam and Christianity is that Islam supports the death penalty while Christianity opposes it. That may be vaguely true at a hyper-general level. But historically speaking I doubt there has been less capital punishment in Christiandom than Islamdom. And the since the Qur’an makes it clear that God’s mercy ultimately prevails over His wrath, and since its prescriptions for harsh justice are tempered by injunctions that mercy is better, virtually all Islamic scholars agree that it is always better for, say, the families of murder victims to forgive, rather than execute, the murderer of their loved ones. Even the Taliban, when its judges preside over murder trials, make every effort to convince victims’ family members to forgive and let the killer go free (typically after paying a fine). So Islam has its own way of being anti-capital-punishment.

    • Troll: Mike Tre
    • Replies: @steinbergfeldwitzcohen
    @Kevin Barrett

    I'm guessing from your name you are a Diaspora European in North America or a European in Europe.
    My ancestors migrated to Quebec over 300 years ago. I don't want any Cultural Enrichment. I want my own culture, language(s) and religion.. No Islam. No Talmudic Judaism. Zero immigration. Expulsion of any immigrants currently here. Without a referendum their presence here is invalid and they must leave.
    I have a right to the fruits of my labor and my ancestors labor. We built it. It is ours. We came her over 300 years ago and carved it out of the wilderness. There was no intent to give anyone here, the Aboriginals, infectious diseases. We didn't genocide anyone.

    Again. I don't want Islam. It is a foreign religion. Barbaric. Not one word about loving your neighbour have I ever heard from any Muslim.
    Whose side are you on Mr. GoodWhite? Do I and my people have any rights anymore? Or are the Rights of Man now for EVERYONE but Europeans?

    Replies: @bikeanarkist

  • First hour: Australian New World Order researcher Peter Myers has just published “Pope Francis blesses Pachamama – a slide into paganism?” The article is reprinted below. Second hour: Rolf Lindgren, a former Libertarian activist, managed the 2008 Barrett for Congress campaign. Now he is a Trump-lovin’ Republican. Get ready for the latest on the “NWO...
  • @Dumbo
    @anonymous

    Actually, Islam makes less sense by your own logic, since a lot of things in Islam are just because "a guy named Mohammed said so". And we have only the testimony of Mohammed, while Jesus has the testimony of several other people.

    And why would Islam make more sense than, say, Judaism, or any other monotheistic faith?

    Honestly I don't understand westerners like Kevin Barrett who convert to Islam. To me they are rejecting their own history and as such they are barely better than the progressive suicide cultists. They are helping to destroy Europe.

    Replies: @Justvisiting, @Kevin Barrett

    Those who exclude Islam from “the West” are the ones rejecting their own history.

    European culture is a mix of Middle Eastern monotheism and classical Greco-Roman culture. The correct version of Middle Eastern monotheism, and corrected version of Christianity, is Islam; and it was through Islamicate civilization that the barbarians on the northwestern fringes of Eurasia rediscovered classical culture.

    The Enlightenment, the source of modern Western culture, was heavily influenced by Islam. The real American religion is Emerson and Thoreau’s Unitarianism, which is in essence de-ritualized Islam. https://crescent.icit-digital.org/articles/enlightenment-unitarianism

    • Replies: @Jake
    @Kevin Barrett

    Some reply you have here.

    " it was through Islamicate civilization that the barbarians on the northwestern fringes of Eurasia rediscovered classical culture." - a load of bunk, which thanks to the gross ignorance of today likely makes sense to many people.

    "The Enlightenment, the source of modern Western culture, was heavily influenced by Islam. The real American religion is Emerson and Thoreau’s Unitarianism, which is in essence de-ritualized Islam." - that is all basically true, but it does not mean what you think it means. The Enlightenment may be seen as the Reformation on steroids, in that it also was an agent to murder Christendom, which made it an ally of both Mohammedanism and Rabbinic Judaism. Unitarianism is a philosophy that fits very nicely, at times perfectly, with both Mohammedanism and Rabbinic Judaism, and it was/is the philosophy of more Yank WASPs than Emerson.

    Yes, America, like the WASP UK, is anti-Christendom and therefore pro-Semitic, particularly pro-Jewish (Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy) but also increasingly pro-Sunni Arabic, most particularly pro-Saudi. And we are seeing the Hellish end results of that heresy playing out.

    Islam in origin is a largely Gnostic Christian heresy, mixed with largely Gnostic Jewish ideas, and formatted to be acceptable to Arabs. Like a shark, Islam either moves and kills and eats perpetually or dies. It is as much quintessential Semitism as is Pharisaic Judaism.

    , @Dumbo
    @Kevin Barrett


    and it was through Islamicate civilization that the barbarians on the northwestern fringes of Eurasia rediscovered classical culture.
     
    This is, I believe, largely a myth. While some Arab translators deserve respect for having translated Aristotle etc and so help to repopularize them, the Byzantine empire kept intact a lot of materials from classical antiquity, and they came mostly from there to the West, but even in Medieval Western Europe several texts from classical antiquity were kept as well. In fact, many of the "lost" works were not really "lost", just untranslated or not easily available to most people. Of course a lot was lost too, but that was in a way unavoidable.

    As for American Unitarianism, I don't know enough about it to reply, but I'm not a fan of Unitarianism or of the American Revolutionaries Masonic ideals.

    I guess each one is free to understand things as they want (didn't René Guenon also convert to Islam? I never understood that, but I'm not a follower of his esoterism either); to me Islam is an alien religion and I wish there weren't so many Muslims in Europe already. Muslim lands are very large, too large I'd say.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    , @sarz
    @Kevin Barrett

    Hi Kevin

    "De-ritualized Islam" — I wonder what rituals you have in mind.

    Good to see Emerson's name. Yours is the only mention I have seen in years. And yet at last mid-century he was thought of by cultivated Americans as marking the high point of American civilization. That was, BJTO, before the judaic takeover.

    Emerson himself used Hinduism to talk of the basics. The Oversoul.

    Hinduism is but a memory in the land of its birth, replaced by the satanic primitive religion of Hindutvuism. Traditional Hinduism was so broad in bridging different religions that Mircea Eliade took Hinduism as comparative religion itself. Alas, its downfall was due to the absence of the concept of shirk (the Islamic term).

    Shirk is the concept you and Peter Myers need, to discuss where the pope might be headed.

    The concept of paganism is too vague to carry you very far.

    And you both need to explore the metaphysics of sacrifice. Start with meditation on the figure of Chinnamasta. That is a diagram of reality you need to figure out. Google Chinnamasta/images.

  • @Gandydancer
    The description refers to two hours of program, but the audio is only one. I thought maybe the second would play automatically if you played the end of the first, but that is not the case. So, perhaps you need two audio strips?

    Also the link to "Truth Jihad" in the "Republished from..." line go to "page could not be found". The content at the alternative https://kevinbarrett.heresycentral.is/category/radio/ seems to be paywalled.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    I always post a description of the live two-hour show at https://kevinbarrett.heresycentral.is/category/radio/ first. Then when I archive the show I divide it into two separate hours. In this case I didn’t get the description fixed in time. Sorry! In any case, all shows become available here at Unz, and also at https://www.patreon.com/DrKevinBarrett where the paywall comes down 72 hours after the show is posted.

  • @Dumbo
    @Kevin Barrett


    and it was through Islamicate civilization that the barbarians on the northwestern fringes of Eurasia rediscovered classical culture.
     
    This is, I believe, largely a myth. While some Arab translators deserve respect for having translated Aristotle etc and so help to repopularize them, the Byzantine empire kept intact a lot of materials from classical antiquity, and they came mostly from there to the West, but even in Medieval Western Europe several texts from classical antiquity were kept as well. In fact, many of the "lost" works were not really "lost", just untranslated or not easily available to most people. Of course a lot was lost too, but that was in a way unavoidable.

    As for American Unitarianism, I don't know enough about it to reply, but I'm not a fan of Unitarianism or of the American Revolutionaries Masonic ideals.

    I guess each one is free to understand things as they want (didn't René Guenon also convert to Islam? I never understood that, but I'm not a follower of his esoterism either); to me Islam is an alien religion and I wish there weren't so many Muslims in Europe already. Muslim lands are very large, too large I'd say.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    It’s true that Byzantium, like al-Andalus and other centers of Islamicate civilization, was a source of the classical texts that sparked the European Renaissance. But Islamicate civilization, stretching from Iberia to China and dominating the “world system” of economic and intellectual exchange, was vastly larger and to some extent encompassed and included Byzantium as one of its minor component parts.

    Additionally, Eastern Christianity always coexisted with Islam, with vibrant Christian communities existing throughout much of the Islamic heartland under Muslim protection. Christian scholars engaged in constant cultural exchange with their Muslim counterparts. So Byzantium was a small outpost of the larger Islamicate world system in which classical civilization continued and developed, while Western Europe collapsed into barbarism.

    For the big picture on Islamicate civilization, read Marshall Hodgson, the best Western writer on the topic.

    • Replies: @SeekerofthePresence
    @Kevin Barrett

    It seems the collapse into barbarism resumes in both Europe and America. As Yeats says, the center cannot hold. Many have lost their religious faith. Material existence is the only existence. God is a prosperity butler. The highest good is conceived as a beer and hot dog at the football game. Literature has become like the barking of a chihuahua. The courts and government are politicized and weaponized. Diplomacy is construed as war. Truculence is the order of the day. Leprosy is potentially coming to major cities like Los Angeles. A fitting denouement, since the face of the West is now that of Dorian Gray.

  • Temple University professor Joan Mellen has published twenty-four books; her overriding theme is “the history of the Central Intelligence Agency and its role in the planning and cover-up of the Kennedy assassination.” In this interview we discuss the JFK assassination, the anniversary of which is one week from tonight, with reference to Joan Mellen’s books:...
  • @Totally Pseudonymic Handle
    I can read a transcript much faster than I can listen to a podcast. There is software that will produce transcripts. Please!!!

    Replies: @Twodees Partain, @Kevin Barrett

    Please recommend specific transcription software!

  • @Skeptikal
    @Iris

    Excellent explanation!
    I think this is one of the clearest explanations I have heard of the events in Dallas.
    I have read a couple of books on the assassination, namely, JFK and the Unspeakable, and Piper's book (too bad the latter wasn't better written).

    What can I read that elaborates on the basic scenario described here?

    Replies: @Genrick Yagoda, @Kevin Barrett

    Laurent Guyénot’s From Yahweh to Zion takes up where Piper left off, and it is much better written (and very well translated ; – ) https://www.amazon.com/Yahweh-Zion-Jealous-Promised-Civilizations/dp/0996143041/ref=sr_1_1

  • We explored the political options and global consequences of the current Israeli crisis… https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/11/24/612052/Israeli-PM-in-Trouble
  • @eah
    FYI (you probably already know)

    The ADL is targeting both of you -- see here

    Gilad Atzmon

    @giladatzmon

    Gilad Atzmon is an anti-Semitic author and musician who describes himself as an “ex-Israeli” and an “ex-Jew.” He is an outspoken promoter of classic anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and a fierce critic of Jewish identity.

    Kevin Barrett

    https://www.facebook.com/kevinj.barrett.12

    A 9/11 truther and anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist who hosts a wide array of anti-Semites and Holocaust deniers on his internet radio show and writes for the Unz Review.
     

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Check out my response to the ADL at https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/11/25/adl-shortlist/

    • Replies: @Jon Baptist
    @Kevin Barrett

    When I think of Gordon Duff and "Veterans Today" two names come to mind: Judas and Cass R. Sunstein.

    Remembering Maidhc Ó Cathail By Alison Weir - https://israelpalestinenews.org/remembering-maidhc-o-cathail/
    https://vocaroo.com/i/s1oXQM13nrHa

  • “All over the world people are rising up!” That’s the superficial view of protesting crowds in the streets in Hong Kong, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Bolivia, Spain, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela, Ecuador, France, and elsewhere. But are all these situations identical? Is it always the same story: People angered by economic issues, protesting against governmental corruption?...
  • @anaccount
    Bolivia is now run by a female lawyer and it just re-established relations with Israel.

    That should tell you something.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

  • Novelist Walt Gragg just published The Chosen One, a new apocalyptic Mideast war novel. It envisions a US war against a self-styled Mahdi’s military attempt to unite the Arab world under an Islamic theocracy. Gragg’s take on Islamic eschatology is, to say the least, problematic: “For fourteen hundred years the prophecy had remained unfulfilled. Islam...
  • One of the incongruous elements of Gragg’s novel is that the forces of his self-styled Mahdi act like Wahhabi-takfiris but have their main base in the Shia majority countries Iraq and Iran.

    I think he basically took the British accounts of the 19th century Sudanese Mahdi uprising and stamped that template on today’s Middle East, where it doesn’t fit. Those British accounts were, of course, extremely self serving, as victors’ history always is, demonizing and dehumanizing the heroes who fought against a massively superior force that was invading and looting their country.

    • Replies: @Crazy Horse
    @Kevin Barrett

    "One of the incongruous elements of Gragg’s novel is that the forces of his self-styled Mahdi act like Wahhabi-takfiris but have their main base in the Shia majority countries Iraq and Iran."

    Well it's much like many of these second cold war "thrillers" (agitprop) comparing Putin to Stalin. A ridiculously absurd or absurdly ridiculous comparison. I look at them as more potboilers for the masses and the basis for another Ziowood movie.

    Personally I thought the following quote was pretty funny:

    “Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great”—which as Graeme MacQueen writes “is as if someone had tried to frame Native Americans for the crime by inserting a note in the letters, ‘White man in heap big trouble.’“

    Another factor is the fact that only six percent of terrorism in America is perpetrated by Islamic Fundamentalists while seven percent is assigned to Jewish Terrorists like for example the J "D" L while most of it is carried out by various political factions on both the left and right of the political spectrum.

    Yet because of the USG's Israelicentric policies they want the public to falsely believe that "Islamic Terrorism" is the problem. Actually if one looks at the definition of Terrorism as defined in the Oxford American as "the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims" then it turns out that the US and their little buddy Israel are the biggest purveyors of Terrorism.

  • Introduction It has been roughly one human lifetime since the United States of America underwent a cataclysmic transformation. December 7, 2019 marks the 78th anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor—the event that turned the United States from a constitutional republic into a globe-straddling empire, which today deploys more than 900 military bases in...
  • @Anon222
    The Pentagon is in Arlington County, not Fairfax County. Getting the little details right is important if you want someone to accept the larger theory.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    These are spontaneous audio interviews. Nobody was speaking from notes or saw my questions beforehand. Both Kimmel and Tarpley got enough details right to demonstrate their mastery of the material, despite this and a few other “oral typos.”

    Whether one agrees with all their perspectives and conclusions is another matter.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    @Kevin Barrett

    Great interviews, Kevin--lots of interesting perspectives.

    I always enjoy Tarpley even when I (one of those nasty "libertarian" types) disagree with him.

    His comments on Churchill wanting to maximize American losses was very interesting.

    I remain unconvinced that World War II was in America's national interest.

    The problem is that the Deep State has cried "Wolf" so many times (often with its own false flags) that it is impossible to tell when the "Wolf" is real.

    I certainly would not want to risk my life or the life of family members based on their propaganda claims.

    , @Cking
    @Kevin Barrett

    There are many layers as to the righteous causes, motivations and final operations for war, but the most strategic is International Finance' imperative for gain and profit through providing industrial capital, manufactures, war materiel, and financing war, cannot be ignored. Professor Tarpley gives us details, good facts, and reasoning justifying what would become 'The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine' yet there are a few suspicious items and issues not covered. Who benefited? In both Wars, the United States benefited. First off, the Federal Reserve Bank made both WWI and WWII possible. In Europe, How could 1939 Poland not see the Red Army massing on its' border? And all the West's 'do-gooder' nations only saw the German menace? And that the Communist nations of Russia and China, secretly collaborating with Supremos of the City of London and Wall St., as investment/profit centers, were allowed to prevail creating the Cold War. China paid off her war debt through the Opium Trade, a distinctly Sino-British firm, that eventually took in the Americans. The Communist Russian and Chinese government policies for murdering their own in war and 'peace time' are not mentioned here. So who and what did we protect? Again, the Fed's organization of America's economy, wealth, money, and credit to wage war is in oblivion in all this discussion.

  • @Kevin Barrett
    @Anon222

    These are spontaneous audio interviews. Nobody was speaking from notes or saw my questions beforehand. Both Kimmel and Tarpley got enough details right to demonstrate their mastery of the material, despite this and a few other "oral typos."

    Whether one agrees with all their perspectives and conclusions is another matter.

    Replies: @Justvisiting, @Cking

    Great interviews, Kevin–lots of interesting perspectives.

    I always enjoy Tarpley even when I (one of those nasty “libertarian” types) disagree with him.

    His comments on Churchill wanting to maximize American losses was very interesting.

    I remain unconvinced that World War II was in America’s national interest.

    The problem is that the Deep State has cried “Wolf” so many times (often with its own false flags) that it is impossible to tell when the “Wolf” is real.

    I certainly would not want to risk my life or the life of family members based on their propaganda claims.

    • Agree: Kevin Barrett
  • @IvyMike
    There isn't much doubt that FDR knew the sanctions against the Japanese economy would force them to respond the only way left to them, by attacking Western interests. The big mistake America made was our certainty that the Japanese military was a joke and couldn't hurt us, the idiocy of thinking they were little subhuman people who couldn't see well enough to shoot straight and that their naval aviation was not up to the task of attacking a modern Western power like ourselves. As W liked to say, "Oops."

    Replies: @Justvisiting, @Twodees Partain

    The Tarpley discussion made it clear there was no “American” position on much of anything–there were factions with different views jockeying for position.

    The map is not the territory.

    • Agree: Kevin Barrett
  • @Pheasant
    The second person interviewd is a Jew doing the usual pilpul but the first guest was amazing.

    Also SLA Marshall was a Jewish liar using pseudoscience to undermine morale in the armed forces. His work has been proven to be bunk.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    My main source on SLA Marshall is Col. Dave Grossman’s remarkable On Killing. What are your sources impugning Marshall?

    • Replies: @Pheasant
    @Kevin Barrett

    It was a long time ago but basically his main work where where he states that out of an infantry platoon only two soldiers fired thier weapons because they were the psychopaths has been refuted. Most soldiers fired and those that did not were busy reloading weapons, fetching ammunition, dressing wounds e.t.c.

    Look it up it is well documented. His ideas lasted for a long time because he tied them to B.f Skinner's work (make training more like rewarding incentives when firing weapons- behaviouralism) but like almost all Jewish pseudoscience it was based on faulty data. Marshall used to claim that he interviewed troops at the front line but actually did not etc.

    The U.S army experienced a decrease in the quality of the infantry in the five years between world war two and the Korean war as well as a crisis of discipline/leadership and S.L.A Marshall's demotivational propaganda (our army despite just having won a war is fundamentally flawed etc) was a part cause of this in addition to the U.S dumping almost all of its war materials left over from the pacific theatre into the sea off Japan (look it up).

    Replies: @Anonymous

  • @Wizard of Oz
    Just en passant..."the negligible military threat posed by the Soviet Union to the United States was wildly exaggerated" is tendentious rubbish. With rapid demobilisation of US forces and the Soviet Union blockading Berlin and taking over the governments in Eastern Europe which should have included non communists the danger to the US was that the Soviet forces could sweep through to the Atlantic coast and consolidate their hold on the whole of Eastern Europe. Who should have taken the risk that they wouldn't try?

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    The Soviet conventional threat was real. But Soviet nuclear capabilities were wildly exaggerated. Throughout the 1950s into the early 1960s Russia had few nuclear-capable missiles, and lots of empty silos. The US figured that out with certainty in 1961. That’s why on July 20, 1961 the Joint Chiefs presented to JFK the Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP) for a “Pearl Harbor” type sneak attack on Russia using 3,000 nuclear weapons. The 1961 SIOP was designed to annihilate the Soviet Union before it reached nuclear parity with the U.S. In a scene right out of Dr. Strangelove, JFK angrily dismissed the Joint Chiefs who had basically told him “just do it, Mr. President! You’ll only lose 20 million Americans, tops!”

    Even after the Soviets caught up and established nuclear parity by the 1970s the US nuclear deterrent was such that the USSR would never have dreamed of invading Western Europe.

    Throughout the Cold War period the US was the aggressor and the Russians were playing defense. Plus ça change…

    • Agree: Desert Fox
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    @Kevin Barrett

    We seem to be referring to slightly different periods. The Military Industrial Complex may have been recognised as a greedy lobby by the late 50s but the combination of China and the USSR in Korea was reason enough to argue that the US was living in a dangerous world.

    , @Wizard of Oz
    @Kevin Barrett

    I would also wish to query your idea that the US before Pearl Harbor could properly be describedvad a peace loving nation. That hardly fits the record from the 18th century onward.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

  • @Wizard of Oz
    @Kevin Barrett

    I would also wish to query your idea that the US before Pearl Harbor could properly be describedvad a peace loving nation. That hardly fits the record from the 18th century onward.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    It may not have been peace loving. Ask the Indians, Mexicans, and Filipinos about that. But it had lower military budgets, not much in the way of a standing army, a strong current of anti-imperialist ideology, few military bases outside its borders, and a consensus supporting George Washington’s warning to stay out of European and foreign quarrels. The massively-funded (Rothschild-driven) propaganda effort that dragged Americans into WWI couldn’t overcome this basic predisposition in the American people and a substantial segment of the elites—witness the 88% “isolationist” sentiment on December 6th, 1941. What finally overcame it was Pearl Harbor.

    Any real (antiwar) Republican could have destroyed Roosevelt in a landslide in the 1940 election, so strong was the American people’s antiwar sentiment. So the House of Morgan, the US agent of the Rothschilds, foisted a nobody, the deceptively pro-war Republican Wilkie (a stealth FDR ally) on the Republicans through massive bribery, slick PR, and murder. This mind-boggling coup d’etat is memorably described in Gore Vidal’s historical novel The Golden Age.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    @Kevin Barrett

    There must be masses of documentation on the Rothschild and other Jewish (or just banker and industrialist) funded "propaganda effort" to get America into WW1. Can you tell me wherr to find it in a reasonably convenient and totally reliable form? I am always a bit suspicious of the use of "Rothshild" symbolically. No doubt that some Rothschild(s) were Zionists when it was still possible for that to be innocently highminded (or maybe not by 1916) and that seems clearly connected to getting America into the war (although the Balfour Declaration was months later - why I wonder). Given the fact that there were still German and Austrian Rothschild businesses why, if you re right, were the English (and French I suppose) Rothschilds so keen to get America into the war?

    , @Wizard of Oz
    @Kevin Barrett

    I was intrigued by the alleged Albert Speer dictum repeated by Wolfawitz. What could he have meant by Germany having a Pearl Harbor with favourable results? Can it mean anything but that a real attack by Poland on Germany would have avoided war against the UK and France so the Nazis coyld have concentrated all their forces against the USSR? If so, it is an unimportant flight of fancy by Speer (whatever Wollfawitz chose to make of it). Can it have any other meaning?

    , @J. Alfred Powell
    @Kevin Barrett

    Thank you, Kevin Barrett, for this valuable essay. I need to take issue with -- or ask for evidence and argument supporting -- the idea that JP Morgan & Co.'s well-evidenced and well-known driving of America into the First World War was "Rothschild-driven." It appears to me that it participated in, and forwarded into an international phase, the consolidation, centralization, and oligarchic-domination of the American economy by the corporate-finance system at whose pinnacle JP Morgan & Co. ruled, a process commenced around 1890. JP Morgan and associated American financial interests made billions off selling munitions to Europe -- and prolonged the war by 18 months and several million deaths (according to historian Harry Elmer Barnes). By the end of the war, as the result of these operations, the center of world finance began its shift to Wall Street, completed during the Second World War, and America (Wall Street) began the process of supplanting Great Britain as the dominant world power, ruler of the seas and captain of world empire, also completed then. So I don't see how this particularly benefited the Rothschilds, except tangentially, or what their motive would have been. There is no doubt that JP Morgan and Rothschild interests worked together to their mutual profit -- notably in the engineered "gold crisis around 1893, but it's my impression the Rothschilds were associates, not bosses.

    Replies: @Johnny Walker Read, @S

    , @J. Alfred Powell
    @Kevin Barrett

    Both 1940 national presidential conventions were extremely fishy. British Intelligence collaborated with American operatives in arranging the Republican nomination of Wall Street insider Wilkie, registered a "Democrat" until a year earlier and a committed interventionist. The first source to look at on this is H. Montgomery Hyde, The Quiet Canadian: The Secret Service Story of Sir William Stephenson (London, Hamilton, 1962) -- avoid the American edition of this book, titled "Room 3603," which is expurgated. The second is Thomas E. Mahl, Desperate Deception: British covert operations in the United States 1939-1944 (Washington, D.C., Brassey, 1998)

    The Democratic Convention in Chicago was disgracefully steamrollered to nominate FDR for a third term. This is attested in many eyewitness accounts, written by observers from all parts of the political spectrum. The place to start is John Flynn's Roosevelt Myth (New York, Devin-Adair, 1948) p. 208-222. Two more are Burton K. Wheeler, in As We Saw The Thirties, ed. R.J. Simon (Urbana, 1967) p. 190-215 esp. 213, and James A. Farley, Jim Farley's Story (New York, 1948) 259-288 esp. 280-282; Farley was FDR's Postmaster General and a major power in the Democratic Party organization. Bernard F. Donahoe, Private Plans and Public Dangers (Notre Dame, 1965) details how starting in 1937 Roosevelt "insiders" began maneuvering to stage a "draft" by acclamation demanding a third term at the 1940 convention. British Intelligence also had a hand in this convention, as Mahl notes.

  • Craig Nelson is suing the Southern Poverty Law Center for defamation. As he wrote in his interview with Linh Dinh: “…while white males are only 30 percent of the US population, we are, according to the Centers for Disease Control, a mind-blowing 70 percent of the nation’s suicides. “It became obvious to me the country...
  • I am not particularly fond of the alt-right, especially its racialist elements: https://crescent.icit-digital.org/articles/rights-and-wrongs-of-the-alt-right

    But even I can see that Craig Nelsen’s lawsuit against the SPLC, and his larger project, is obviously worthy of support.

    Pro-white folks ought to put their energy and money into supporting people like Craig who are doing something positive for the most disadvantaged whites, while maintaining respectful relations with non-whites. Craig and Sherman together can win the hearts of the jury, and of the wider public that hears about the case. The MSM will be fighting an uphill battle if it tries to demonize them.

    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
    @Kevin Barrett

    Thank you, Kevin.

    You know, some time after I posted the fundraising appeal above I got around to listening to the interview. At the beginning of the program, before the interview begins, you make your own appeal. So, when I listened to it, I thought to myself that I should have really cleared it with you first--that I had really just come in and stomped all over your bailiwick. But, instead of being offended, you post a message asking for support for our effort.

    I have a story about "big-souledness". For a time I lived across the street from a 7-11 in Washington, DC. On the second floor, upstairs from the 7-11, there was some kind of mosque. One afternoon, I was crossing the street toward the 7-11 and, ahead of me, also crossing the street, was a guy wearing a long white robe heading to the mosque. While he walked, he ripped open an envelope, removed the letter inside, tossed the envelope on the ground, and continued walking while he read the letter.

    Now, sitting right in front of the door to the mosque, was a big dumpster. So, as I passed the envelope on the ground, I bent down and picked it up and said to him, as I tossed the envelope in the dumpster, "Here, this is how we do this."

    The guy stopped and looked at me and do you know what he said? "Thank you, brother. You have taught me something today."

    Totally taken aback, I mumbled no problem or something like that and kept walking. But I thought to myself wow, that was big-souled. We've all been chastised in public by strangers and I think we would all have to agree that it would be really hard to respond as he did.

    A lawyer friend of mine who is Jewish scolded me for appearing on your show because you were accused by a Jewish newspaper in Canada of being a Holocaust denier. I will never find a lawyer to represent me, she told me, because they all run from that accusation. That led to a long debate in which I maintained there is no such thing as an evil opinion--only rational or irrational ones. And that's good, because we can attack irrational opinions through argument and debate. To eradicate evil opinion ultimately requires the eradication of the humans who hold them.

    Opinions are a kind of thought, and thoughts are only quasi-real. To demonstrate this, just try to think of a thought. Thoughts only become actual when they are actualized in the real world through willed action. Thus, real evil can only be an action.

    At first, my lawyer friend said my position was insane, but, in the end, I think she was convinced. She said that my love of argument was an example of my Jewishness and she wouldn't have said that if she thought I lost the debate.

    If it were my opinion that all Muslims are "mud people", the big-souled action of that littering Muslim in front of the 7-11 that day in DC would have demonstrated to me that my opinion was irrational. I can then adjust my opinion to make it more rational, i.e., conform to reality. However, if opinions are divided between good and evil, I don't have that flexibility. This inflexibility allows for irrationality to proliferate.

    And this is why that really matters. In our society today, it is the nearly universal belief that "racism" is an evil opinion. And those few who don't believe that still fall into the same trap because they simply define racism as "not evil", or good opinion. The resulting chaos and irrationality we see all around us today when it comes to race is apparent to everyone--and it won't end well. Imagine how much more sane society would be, and how much brighter the future, if racist beliefs were neither evil nor good. For one thing, the catastrophic 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act would have never happened.

    So, Kevin, looking forward to another appearance on your program, if you'll invite me. And if some lawyer somewhere won't take my case because of it, fuck 'em. They're the irrational ones.

  • Ron Unz, publisher of the Unz Review and author of the critically important American Pravda series of articles, has argued that the truth movement ought to recognize that its primary enemy is the mainstream media—and strategically work to discredit it by “swarming” its weakest links with alternative perspectives. Rather than limiting themselves to one or...
  • Ron Unz has argued that the truth movement ought to recognize that its primary enemy is the mainstream media—and strategically work to discredit it by “swarming” its weakest links with alternative perspectives.

    Follow the vets on this one.

    Recently some of the young, just-returning-from-Afganistan soldiers, and our other wars also, are forming the equivalent of the old Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

    The new movement should be getting more attention soon. It’s still fairly new and very under-reported, but the are getting around to talking with the older vets and civilians and gaining some traction.

    What was heartening about the old VVAW was that they made great strides in shaking Nixon’s “silent majority” horse apples by simply talking to their fathers, uncles, veterans of Korea or WWII and telling them it’s really wasn’t about the long-haired draft dodgers vs Patriotism. A year after Nixon’s 1972 landslide lots of the older vets wouldn’t admit to voting for Dick, which was a joy to behold.

    Face it, the media and government have made a cult of the Thank a Vet and all that. Some of us actual vets smell a rat. The UK has created the same sort of cult, which is just as suspicious as ours.

    Not professors or specialist academics. Just the young people who saw what they saw and can spread the news to the rest of the country. It worked a bit back then, might work now.

    Anyone here who’s recently back or has some useful things to say about the start of the current wars might want to have a thread dedicated to that?

    • Agree: Kevin Barrett
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    @Franz

    You are onto something extremely important, Franz: ability to shape events rests in those with "the monopoly on violence."

    Ron Unz operates in the world of communications, and it's clear that communications -- whether writers like Tom Paine, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Mearsheimer & Walt, or Henry Luce, New York Times and National Review, or Hollywood and cable and network televised & internet media -- point the direction someone wants a mob (crowd) to turn.

    But Ron describes a chicken-and-egg problem: The Luce - NYTimes - Hollywood etc. faction holds financial and other forms of enforcement power over the opposition: the notable writers that Unz regards highly (and features on his phenomenal archive) were neutered, rendered impotent by the ability of those who were able to punish them (or those who would publish and sell them) financially, socially, even physically. Up-and-coming, or would-be truth-telling notable writers are even more vulnerable to that ability to punish.

    So it's not the thinkers and writers that are lacking.

    It is that enforcement power, "the monopoly on violence," as Cora Sol Goldstein terms it in Capturing the German Eye, a recounting of the psychological warfare carried out upon Germans in the aftermath of WWII, that "crushes" the resistance and elevates usurpers.

    In Germany, that power was held by US military forces -- soldiers, just like the ones Franz describes. Goldstein also observed that military leaders as well as congress persons were often and vocally opposed to the violent means and psychological warfare being carried out against the German people [see Bendersky], but that civilians on the ground usurped authority and raised private funds to devise schemes of their own to continue psychological warfare.

    In other words, soldiers ended up pointing their weapons in directions not fully sanctioned by those who held legitimate authority.

    Therefore, I believe that in furtherance of Ron Unz's hopes expressed in conversation w/ Kevin Barrett, it is extremely important to get those who actually wield the instruments of violence to re-direct those instruments toward defense of the American people, not the usurpers.

    Franz's words are very important and deserve broader hearing and support:


    Face it, the media and government have made a cult of the Thank a Vet and all that. Some of us actual vets smell a rat. The UK has created the same sort of cult, which is just as suspicious as ours.

    Not professors or specialist academics. Just the young people who saw what they saw and can spread the news to the rest of the country. It worked a bit back then, might work now.

    Anyone here who’s recently back or has some useful things to say about the start of the current wars might want to have a thread dedicated to that?
     

    , @anon
    @Franz


    Recently some of the young, just-returning-from-Afganistan soldiers, and our other wars also, are forming the equivalent of the old Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

    The new movement should be getting more attention soon.
     
    It will be quickly taken over by Trotskyites, the split when select Infantry are charged with murders on the Afghanistan battlefield.
  • Philosophy and humanities teacher Thaddeus Kozinski discusses his new book Modernity as Apocalypse: Sacred Nihilism and the Counterfeits of Logos. “With a questioning spirit not unlike that of Socrates, the ‘gadfly’ of Athens, Thaddeus Kozinski here examines modernity through a variety of lenses—historical, cultural, philosophical, theological, anthropological, psychological, political, pedagogical—casting light on the Logos that...
  • @Dumbo

    Thaddeus Kozinski

     

    Whew. For a moment there I thought the interview was with the Unabomber, but that's Ted Kaczynski. But actually an interview with the Unabomber might be interesting; his manifesto was.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Both Thaddeus and Ted are astute critics of modernity.

    The secular liberalism that Thaddeus criticizes leads straight to the technological nightmare that Ted wants to blow up.

  • Ron Unz, publisher of the Unz Review and author of the critically important American Pravda series of articles, has argued that the truth movement ought to recognize that its primary enemy is the mainstream media—and strategically work to discredit it by “swarming” its weakest links with alternative perspectives. Rather than limiting themselves to one or...
  • @Chris in Cackalacky
    As I listened to this podcast, my attention wandered off momentarily. When my focus came back, I thought I was listening to the movie 'Dinner With Andre'.' Since Ron Unz did not mention the fly in the cup of coffee left out overnight, I quickly regained my bearing.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    If anyone in Hollywood wants to buy the rights to this interview, I’m sure it would make a gripping thriller of a conversation movie.

  • CUNY philosophy professor Peter Simpson returns to follow up on his November 29th interview “Why Theocracy Is Better than Secular Liberalism.” Tonight we continue that conversation, and compare Christian and Islamic approaches to theocracy. Contrary to popular stereotypes, theocracy is not religious tyranny. Instead, it is a system in which a spiritual authority exists alongside...
  • @Talha

    a spiritual authority that has some real say and control over what goes on in society
     
    Love this.

    just as imams would depose sultans
     
    When did this happen? One example would be nice, three would be quite instructive.

    Peace.

    Replies: @AnonStarter, @Kevin Barrett

    The most obvious example is when Imam Khomeini deposed the Sultan (Shah) in 1979.

    Sultans have struggled against the religious scholars and saints for legitimacy throughout the past 1300 years of Moroccan history. Rulers have routinely lost some or all of their authority due to religious edicts/uprisings of various kinds. https://www.amazon.com/Realm-Saint-Authority-Moroccan-Sufism/dp/0292712103

    Plenty of other examples are out there for other Muslim-majority lands. A good place to start to get a sense of the big picture is Marshall Hodgson’s three-volume masterpiece The Venture of Islam.

  • Presbyterian minister John Shuck is leaving his KBOO-Portland radio show “Beloved Community” and his church position. Apparently neither the radio station nor the church can handle the truth about 9/11 and related topics. John recently wrote me: Dear Dr. Barrett, A number of changes have happened to me. I am no longer pastor at my...
  • @Mike_from_SGV
    I used to read John Shuck's blog when he had lots of focus on the bible and scholarship. I guess his focus became too political even for a Presbyterian church, whose main focus is culture and politics.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    The problem wasn’t being too political. It was the content of his politics, starting with 9/11 truth.

    • Replies: @anaccount
    @Kevin Barrett

    I'm sure that didn't help but based on antifa's threat letter it was your (sensible and openminded) articles on the 'holocaust' that really set things in motion. That is how it appears to me but if you insist it was primarily Shuck's 9/11 skepticism I will take your word for it.

  • In this, the second part of a special two-part interview with Globalization Studies Professor Anthony Hall, we focus on what may be the biggest topic of the 2020s: *The decline of US empire and emergence of a multipolar world; *specifically, the rise of Russia and China; *and the ongoing triumph of the Axis of Resistance...
  • @Priss Factor
    Decline of US empire? No, US is still the sole superpower. More importantly, the real power isn't 'American' but Jewish Supremacist. US is the main aircraft carrier and bank of the Empire of Judea, but the tentacles of EOJ is across many nations in North America, Europe, South America, Middle East, and Africa, esp South Africa.

    If anything, the 'Americanization' of the world -- which means falling under control of Jewish influence -- is still the main phenom around the world.

    Even when nations supposedly oppose globalism, all they do is invite more Diversity and suck up to Jews. Look at Brexit. Leaving EU has led the UK to take in more darkies and suck up to Jews even more under Boris the Spider Johnson.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Iris

    The US can no longer get what it wants. It has wanted to take back Venezuela for two decades and can’t do it. It wanted the Taliban defeated and eliminated by 2002. It wanted a stable pro-Israel pro-US Iraq by 2004 at the latest. It wanted Iran, the “7th country in 5 years” destroyed (or “regime changed”) by 2006. It wanted Assad out. It wanted North Korea to give up its nukes. It wanted Turkey to stop working with Russia and give up the S-400. It wanted Pakistan to stop tilting toward China. It wanted the Ukronazis to win. It wanted Russia to cave. It wanted to stop Russia from being Europe’s biggest energy supplier. It wanted Chinese economic growth, and the technological and military power it buys, to flatline. And so on.

    Meanwhile the other poles of the multipolar world led by Russia, China, and Iran have let the US spend itself into a corner. The dollar is hollowed out and will collapse whenever the other poles want it to. And the big expensive military that killed the dollar can’t even beat backwards tribesmen in places like Yemen and Afghanistan. So the 2020s will undoubtedly witness the US getting less and less of what it wants. The US ability to dictate terms to the world is over.

    As for the Zionists, they are just a parasite that sucks whatever blood is available. America’s blood is almost gone. So they will diversify their bloodsucking, and are in fact already doing so.

    • Agree: follyofwar, Crazy Horse
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    @Kevin Barrett


    The US can no longer get what it wants.
     
    But the US never got everything it wanted. During the Cold War, it lost Cuba. And even its successes in Latin America smeared US reputation as it had to support right-wing death squads. US pulled out of Vietnam. US power was at its zenith with the fall of Soviet Empire, but by the end of the 20th century, Putin and nationalists were regaining power in Russia. And the Middle East was mostly intact except for Iraq that had been crushed in the Gulf War. (Still, Hussein was in power until 2003.) So, it's wrong to say the world order went from US getting everything to US not getting everything. US never got everything.

    It has wanted to take back Venezuela for two decades and can’t do it
     
    .

    But Venezuela is on shaky legs and is far weaker than in the Bush II years when Chavez was snubbing its nose. Chavez deserves praise as nationalist, but his version of socialism was deeply flawed as it depended on high oil prices and patronage machines. Once oil prices plummeted, so did the economy. The regime in power is weaker than ever and just holding on. Also, US mostly pushed back against the Latin National Left. Ecuador is now in hands of US stooges. Brazil is ruled by pro-Zionist Bolsanaro. Bolivia is now ruled by pro-US junta-backed 'democracy'. Cuba, though independent, signed onto globo-homo nonsense.

    It wanted the Taliban defeated and eliminated by 2002. It wanted a stable pro-Israel pro-US Iraq by 2004 at the latest.
     
    Maybe, maybe not. In a way, the Taliban resistance is useful excuse for the US to keep occupying the nation. If the Taliban had really been eradicated, US would no longer have any reason to stay. US wants to occupy Afghanistan, not let it go. So, as long as the US has the 'Taliban' excuse, it stays and gets what it wants, thus encircling both Russia and Iran.

    As for Iraq, it was a disaster, but that was good for the Empire of Judea(that rules the US) in a way. After all, a stable democracy in Iraq might still be nationalist and still pro-Arabist. It's possible that once the Jewish-run US realized that the Shia-led regime in Iraq would lean toward Iran, it secretly armed and aided Sunni insurgents to attack and subvert the government. Make Arabs fight Arabs. Play both sides. To the extent that new Iraq had been a never-ending story of Arabs killing Arabs, the Empire of Judea loves it. After all, it created the exact same conditions in Libya and Syria. So, in that sense, the 'disaster' of Iraq turned out to be a handy template in dealing with other Arab nations. Don't invade and turn them into democracies. Just arm and fund certain 'moderate rebel' factions and set them loose to turn the Middle East upside down. While Israel is peaceful and prosperous, look at the horrible status of Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Total hell on earth. It looks like 'failure' but is actually success. And Jewish-run US pulled it off with help from treacherous Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

    As for Iran, it is reeling more than ever from economic sanctions. Given that Iran is a huge nation, it's likely that US doesn't want full-blown war with it. Rather, it uses financial terrorism and other means to undermine Iran, and it's been very successful. US didn't get Assad out but got the next best thing. An utterly ruined Syria where US continues to occupy and steal oil. As for Pakistan leaning closer to China, that is the consequence of US growing closer to India, the much bigger prize. Though India is too big for the US to push around, it's been working with US as bulwark against China-Pakistan. To be sure, the Hindus are clever and play both sides.

    It wanted the Ukronazis to win. It wanted Russia to cave. It wanted to stop Russia from being Europe’s biggest energy supplier.
     
    The Ukronazis did win. They are still in power in alliance with Judeo-Nazis. Also, the energy war is just starting. With the shale revolution, the US aims to export tons of liquid gas to the EU.
    As for China, who knows what will happen. It's debt is 3x its GDP.

    The dollar is hollowed out and will collapse whenever the other poles want it to. And the big expensive military that killed the dollar can’t even beat backwards tribesmen in places like Yemen and Afghanistan.
     
    But even now, nothing comes close to the power of the dollar. And Chinese economy depends so much on export to the US. In that sense, US has China by the balls. China relies far more on US market than other way around. Also, US military didn't engage in Yemen. In Afghanistan, it is there to occupy and continues to do so.

    So the 2020s will undoubtedly witness the US getting less and less of what it wants.
     
    But the US is still the #1 destination for smart people around the world. They will coming to NY, LA, and San Fran to serve the US in its high-tech domination. Immigration is mass treason. Hindus, Muslims, Chinese, Russians, and etc come to the US to make money and to serve the Empire of Judea, often against their own kind. Palestinians in the US pay taxes that go to support Israel's oppression of Palestinians.

    As for the Zionists, they are just a parasite that sucks whatever blood is available.
     
    The problem is they are para-hosts. Yes, Jewish power is parasitic and sucks blood, as in the 2008 bank bailouts. But Jewish genius does create lots of new enterprise and money, and goyim(esp politicians) suck on Jewish money and have grown dependent on it. Jews are not like the Sicilian-Americans in GOODFELLAS who are purely parasitic or like Gypsies who only steal. Jews do a lot of bad shit but they are also at the frontline of the creating the new world of technology and markets. Thus, too many goyim have grown dependent on Jewish money-making. They suck blood of Jews who suck on blood of goyim.

    Replies: @anonymous

  • @Priss Factor
    Decline of US empire? No, US is still the sole superpower. More importantly, the real power isn't 'American' but Jewish Supremacist. US is the main aircraft carrier and bank of the Empire of Judea, but the tentacles of EOJ is across many nations in North America, Europe, South America, Middle East, and Africa, esp South Africa.

    If anything, the 'Americanization' of the world -- which means falling under control of Jewish influence -- is still the main phenom around the world.

    Even when nations supposedly oppose globalism, all they do is invite more Diversity and suck up to Jews. Look at Brexit. Leaving EU has led the UK to take in more darkies and suck up to Jews even more under Boris the Spider Johnson.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett, @Iris

    Decline of US empire? No, US is still the sole superpower.

    Economics says otherwise.

    Peak economic power for the Western world, of which the US still is the undisputed leader, was reached in the 1950’s, with this block producing over 65% of the world’s GDP.

    By 2015, the West’s share had shrunk to below 45%, and the trend is accelerating.

    Short of the occurrence of WW3 and the incertitude it would bring, there is no way the US Deep State and its all-controlling Zionist parasite can continue “leading” the world.

    • Agree: Kevin Barrett
  • First 25 minutes: Jason Unruhe of Maoist Rebel News and yours truly join Iranian broadcaster Press TV to discuss the rebellion in Baghdad’s Green Zone, where protestors angered by the US killing more than 30 members of Iraq’s armed forces are threatening to break into the American Embassy. Don’t miss the passionate 9/11 truth rant...
  • @Anonymous
    I am skeptical of all of this China Uiger hysteria.

    If you want to make China look bad, there are lots of things you can go to. But this Uigher hysteria just looks trumped up and fake.

    You can easily find links to Iraqi soldiers murdering Kuwaiti children in hospitals. It looks like the West just wants a pretext to hurt China on and more importantly get Muslims to hate China since the West does not like to get their own hands dirty.

    Replies: @Kevin Barrett

    Based on facts on the ground, it seem China is using the standard counterinsurgency strategy of going after the whole population that shares some of the ideas (or even religion) of the handful of active insurgents. That’s a very bad strategy, strategically as well as morally. The only way for China to “win” would be to complete another genocide, like their 19th century Zunghar Holocaust, which the world’s nearly 2 billion Muslims have not forgotten and will never forgive. The destruction of the Uyghurs would set the stage for the destruction of the New Silk Road and a 1000 year Muslim war on China.

    • Replies: @d dan
    @Kevin Barrett


    "Based on facts on the ground..."
     
    LOL. CIA disinformation and media echo chamber are not "facts" on the ground.

    "China.... going after the whole population that shares some of the ideas (or even religion) of the handful of active insurgents."
     
    Think before you write, Mr Barrett. Do you think China is so stupid? What is China's incentive for going after the WHOLE population? Don't they understand all the bad and extremely obvious consequences that you superficially anticipate here?
    , @Anon
    @Kevin Barrett


    The only way for China to “win” would be to complete another genocide, like their 19th century Zunghar Holocaust, which the world’s nearly 2 billion Muslims have not forgotten and will never forgive
     
    I assume you meant Dungan, not Zunghar. There was Dzungar which was different from Dungan.

    If you are being honest you should have told the whole story, so the whole world can learn from this tragedy. Instead, you are cherry-picking history to promote your agenda.

    For these who aren't familiar with the so-called "Zungar Holocaus", here is a little more info.

    After the Taiping Rebellion (Chinese against Manchu's rule - 1850 to 1864), the Manchu Qing dynasty was severely weakened and started gradually losing control of some parts of China. There were a lot of social unrest during and after the Taiping Rebellion. The social unrest in ShannXi province became skirmish between Hui and Han Chinese, and skirmishes turned into a full-blown Hui rebellion. The rebellion started in 1862 and was put down by the Qing government army in 1873.

    In ShannXi and Gansu province alone, 20 million people died, and most of them were Han Chinese. In terms of percentage, Hui and Han Chinese suffered equally - about 74.5%.

    What Kevin failed to mention was the massacres of the Han Chinese perpetrated by the Muslim army. A case in point, in Jan 1863 (Chinese Lunar Calendar) when Hui army took the city "Gu Yuan", they killed over 200,000 civilians. In Aug 1863, they killed double of that number of civilians in the city "Ping Liang Fu". In Oct 1863, they massacred about 150,000 civilian in the city of "Ning Xia Fu".

    There were a lot killings on both sides; there were a lot of victims and sufferings. I guess in your book Chinese victims don't count much even though more Chinese civilians died in the rebellion.

    , @Anonymous
    @Kevin Barrett

    You answered the main reason that Uighers are becoming a thing in the West.

    The West seeks to take up the Uigher cause to stop China's silk road expansion. The West wants to use Muslims as a proxy army against China because they want to avoid using their own soldiers.

    This is classic Anglo/Jewish divide and conquer.

    You didn't provide proof that Uighers are actually being harmed though. Meanwhile we have ample proof that the West makes up hysterics when they want to target a country just like the West did against Iraq and their soldiers killing babies.

    Replies: @Anon