RSSComplete bullshit.Keating's "banana republic" comment was just one of the over the top expressions he was inclined towards. (The "recession we had to have" was another one, and which mightily upset other members of the Labor caucus). The basic point of it was simply a warning against a too heavy reliance on resources exports; he certainly didn't claim Australia was a banana republic, much less a "basket case" (a term which dates back to WWI, and referred to a soldier who'd had his limbs blown away and had to be carried in a basket).Replies: @Blinky Bill, @Blinky Bill
Australia was a Banana Republic aka economic basket case prior to that.
On a Interesting side note Banana’s are one of the few Australian agricultural commodities that are unlikely to find a market in Asia due to Australia’s high labour costs. So in that sense Australia will never become a true Banana Republic. P.S you have to understand the context in which such conversation start. 🍌🍌🍌
The driving force behind Australia's economic success was and is its own Look East economic policy instituted by Prime Minister Paul Keating in the late 80s and early 90s. Australia was a Banana Republic aka economic basket case prior to that. She then turned her back on Britain and Europe in an economic sense, or was it the other way around. I see no reason why Russia can't do the same. Concerning natural resources Russia is like Australia only more so and her substantially larger population, far from being a liability provides her with greater human capital.Replies: @silviosilver
I don’t buy the ‘resource curse’ argument. Canada and Australia are both full of commodoties and natural resources. That has not prevented either of them from getting rich, despite being hugely reliant on them in their export shares (especially Australia, where commodoties form over 80% of their exports).
Australia was a Banana Republic aka economic basket case prior to that.
Complete bullshit.
Keating’s “banana republic” comment was just one of the over the top expressions he was inclined towards. (The “recession we had to have” was another one, and which mightily upset other members of the Labor caucus). The basic point of it was simply a warning against a too heavy reliance on resources exports; he certainly didn’t claim Australia was a banana republic, much less a “basket case” (a term which dates back to WWI, and referred to a soldier who’d had his limbs blown away and had to be carried in a basket).
Which is ironic considering that is the very thing that has driven Australia's economic prosperity over the last 30 years along with agriculture, tourism, education and property, Australia's own Look East economic program. One very insightful exercise is to compare Sweden and Canada to Australia over the last 30 to 40 years and their relative economic and living standards.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @silviosilver
The basic point of it was simply a warning against a too heavy reliance on resources exports.
Firstly, Australia's economic performance and political stability in those two decades were in no way wholly reliant on the prices of its mineral exports -- in contradistinction to what occurs in actual banana republics.
I see no reason why a Western country such as Australia’s economic performance in the 1970s and 1980s can’t be described as Banana Republic like.
Ah, I see. So Australia is nothing like Honduras or Guatemala, now or then. Much in the same way that Russia is nothing like Gabon or Thailand now or then. Well except in a very narrow economic sense lacking in any nuance, framed in such way as to make a particular point. E.g. Paul Keating, Blinky Bill, Lee Kuan Yew and Thulean Friend.
With all due respect, both those statements are absurd. The 'Gabon with snow' comments were typically made in the late 90s/early 2000s when the dominant picture of Russia was one of utter decay. That was not representative of Russia, just as parity with the rich world clearly isn't, given that Russia seems perpetually unable to catch up. Stagnation is more in line with their historical experience and we see that today, too. Hence my comparison with 'fancy Asians vs jungle Asians' in a European context. Nobody would claim Thailand is on par with Nigeria, just as they would balk at any serious comparison with Japan or South Korea. There's a middle-layer here that middling countries like Russia or Thailand occupy. Still decent countries by any stretch. Just incapable of becoming economically elite/exceptional. Australia in the 1970s and 80s was a rich country already and Keating's comments were obviously intended as inflammatory on purpose in order to remind people that prosperity is not guaranteed, even if it had already been de facto obtained. I'm reminded of Lew Kuan Yew's comments about Australia risking to be the 'white trash of Asia' as comments made in similar veins. Don't take prosperity for granted. Difference is that Australia not only achieved it back then, but has kept at it. Russia has never tasted it once.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @John Arthur, @Dmitry, @AP, @Blinky Bill, @Anatoly Karlin
If modern day Russia and it’s economic performance can be described as Gabon with snow or a petrol station masquerading as country. I see no reason why a Western country such as Australia’s economic performance in the 1970s and 1980s can’t be described as Banana Republic like.
With all due respect, both those statements are absurd.
But yet you go onto argue……
middling countries like Russia or Thailand
Russia has never tasted it once.
Your views on Russia and Eastern Europe remind me a great deal of the animation I linked early to. Hyper realistic in one sense wholly untruthful in another.
Interesting discussion of the future of US role in the world post-Cold-War. From 1990. Watching this, we realize how so much went wrong.
Also, McLaughlin speaks of TWIN GEEKS at 11:10.
With all due respect, both those statements are absurd. The 'Gabon with snow' comments were typically made in the late 90s/early 2000s when the dominant picture of Russia was one of utter decay. That was not representative of Russia, just as parity with the rich world clearly isn't, given that Russia seems perpetually unable to catch up. Stagnation is more in line with their historical experience and we see that today, too. Hence my comparison with 'fancy Asians vs jungle Asians' in a European context. Nobody would claim Thailand is on par with Nigeria, just as they would balk at any serious comparison with Japan or South Korea. There's a middle-layer here that middling countries like Russia or Thailand occupy. Still decent countries by any stretch. Just incapable of becoming economically elite/exceptional. Australia in the 1970s and 80s was a rich country already and Keating's comments were obviously intended as inflammatory on purpose in order to remind people that prosperity is not guaranteed, even if it had already been de facto obtained. I'm reminded of Lew Kuan Yew's comments about Australia risking to be the 'white trash of Asia' as comments made in similar veins. Don't take prosperity for granted. Difference is that Australia not only achieved it back then, but has kept at it. Russia has never tasted it once.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @John Arthur, @Dmitry, @AP, @Blinky Bill, @Anatoly Karlin
If modern day Russia and it’s economic performance can be described as Gabon with snow or a petrol station masquerading as country. I see no reason why a Western country such as Australia’s economic performance in the 1970s and 1980s can’t be described as Banana Republic like.
Stagnation is more in
Nations and civilizations rise and fall, and is something dynamic. So it does not make sense just to choose the current time point, as you might perhaps be comparing one nation’s peak with another nation’s bottom. What time point will you select for a fair comparison? You need to compare high points with high points, and low points with low points.
In the situation of the Russian world?
If we look at e.g. 1960-1970. In those years, the Russian world was dominating very many areas of human achievement, and even the internal situation had a strongly upward trajectory. That’s besides, controlling by far the largest land in the world (with Southern borders on Iran, Afghanistan, Turkey, and Eastern borders to Poland and Romania), also controlling indirectly partially many foreign countries all the way to Berlin – developing the world’s 2nd or 1st military power, and even quite an amount of soft power to influence parts of countries which were outside indirect control (for example, even countries like France and Italy).
In that time point, the appearance was of overachieving people. On the other hand, if you look at the current time point, then the impression is of stagnation and underachieving people (really it is after several decades of decline in relative power).
–
Similarly, if we choose Sweden in 1850, then everyone will be talking about stagnation, poverty and underachievement. On the other hand, Sweden 1960 – the discussion was concluding the opposite. It was considered utopia by international observers.
To go a little offtopic, there is an interesting video report I found of BBC about Sweden in 1963. It's considered utopia, without irony in this naive journalist's discussion. https://www.facebook.com/BBCArchive/videos/572279669961124/Replies: @Thulean Friend
Sweden 1960 – the discussion was concluding the opposite. It was considered utopia
With all due respect, both those statements are absurd. The 'Gabon with snow' comments were typically made in the late 90s/early 2000s when the dominant picture of Russia was one of utter decay. That was not representative of Russia, just as parity with the rich world clearly isn't, given that Russia seems perpetually unable to catch up. Stagnation is more in line with their historical experience and we see that today, too. Hence my comparison with 'fancy Asians vs jungle Asians' in a European context. Nobody would claim Thailand is on par with Nigeria, just as they would balk at any serious comparison with Japan or South Korea. There's a middle-layer here that middling countries like Russia or Thailand occupy. Still decent countries by any stretch. Just incapable of becoming economically elite/exceptional. Australia in the 1970s and 80s was a rich country already and Keating's comments were obviously intended as inflammatory on purpose in order to remind people that prosperity is not guaranteed, even if it had already been de facto obtained. I'm reminded of Lew Kuan Yew's comments about Australia risking to be the 'white trash of Asia' as comments made in similar veins. Don't take prosperity for granted. Difference is that Australia not only achieved it back then, but has kept at it. Russia has never tasted it once.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @John Arthur, @Dmitry, @AP, @Blinky Bill, @Anatoly Karlin
If modern day Russia and it’s economic performance can be described as Gabon with snow or a petrol station masquerading as country. I see no reason why a Western country such as Australia’s economic performance in the 1970s and 1980s can’t be described as Banana Republic like.
Hence my comparison with ‘fancy Asians vs jungle Asians’ in a European context. Nobody would claim Thailand is on par with Nigeria, just as they would balk at any serious comparison with Japan or South Korea. There’s a middle-layer here that middling countries like Russia or Thailand occupy. Still decent countries by any stretch. Just incapable of becoming economically elite/exceptional.
An interesting comparison. However Eastern Europe has not yet fully recovered from Communism so the current situation vis a vis the rest of Europe does not necessarily represent something natural and permanent. Before Communism, Hungary and the Czechs were certainly within Western European norms. Even Ukrainian Galicia, tied with Croatia as poorest part of Austria, was richer than Portugal.
This legacy is seen even today.https://i.imgur.com/eqhCazw.pngAnd most of these countries have seen massive emigration over the last 15 years! Czechia and Slovenia seem to be the only ones with a half-competent housing policy. Still, considering that the housing was often of sub-par quality (2/3rd of Czechs didn't even have indoor plumbing in the new housing built from 1950-75), and it really beggars belief how these self-described 'socialist' countries' elites could even live with themselves.Sweden's numbers are much worse than they should be. We had a massive building programme in Sweden called Miljonprogrammet. It built one million dwellings over the course of 1965-1975. It largely solved the problem when it was done. The important part here is to correctly define the problem, because it has been endlessly scapegoated, demonised and blamed for virtually all social ills in Sweden. Buildings are easy to blame because they can't argue back.It got this bad reputation for political reasons. The tail end of the programme was also the same year that our constitution was changed to facilitate mass immigration. The newcomers all congregated in these areas, which had two effects: A) it made them more dysfunctional, but instead of blaming the people, Swedish authorities preferred to blame housing policy out of cowardice and B) it gradually made the the housing situation in Sweden less affordable over the decades as rapid population growth was unrelenting and rising. Miljonprogrammet was not designed for such an outcome.The programme, when judged on its initial parameters (it assumed a gently rising population of native Swedes), would have been a big success in solving an acute crisis. It never got that chance as events superceded it.They don't even look so bad:https://i.imgur.com/6LL2BDZ.jpgThis picture was taken quite a long time ago now. There's been a massive investment drive over the last decade to upgrade already decent neighbourhoods to getting even better in infrastructure, housing stock quality, communication improvements etc.Husby and Tensta are some of the more notorious so-called "no-go zones" in Stockholm. I've been to both of them multiple times, passing through. Believe me, they are leafy and pleasant. Most of the pictures you see on the internet are taken during the winter, and often in narrow side-alleys to make it look much more grim than they are, to undergird the narrative of "oppressed/betrayed migrants". I was in Prague a few years ago, and took a few days to visit the commieblock outskirts where the actual people live. What would be a lower middle-class neighbourhood in Prague would be significantly worse than what you get in a place like Husby in terms of upkeep, infrastructure etc. It makes me angry that perfectly decent neighbourhoods are spoiled on ungrateful and useless people when they should be used by poorer swedes or newly moved-in students/youngsters, the two most logical groups that should inhabitate these areas. Instead a lot of the people I know have to skip apartments every 3-6 months, living like gypsies, moving in as live-in residents. I'm foruntate enough to have stable dwelling in a good neighbourhood, but this shouldn't be a luxury, even though it increasingly seems so. 30-40 years ago, you could move to almost any place in Stockholm and find cheap, affordable housing with minimal waiting times, and with very few social problems around you.Replies: @utu, @Blinky Bill
Although the housing situation had markedly improved compared to prewar levels, construction could not keep up with the more rapidly rising demand, especially given the radical change in familly patterns. Prewar large families comprising three generations were split into smaller family groups, and the increased number of divorces resulted in fragmented families.The moderate increase in housing could not cover needs, and thus shortages in housing, one of the most burning social problems, were prevalent throughout the entire postwar period. New couples, in several cases, shared small one-bedroom apartments with their parents, and divorced coupled had to continue living together sometimes for years. Apartments were often shared by two, and in some cases, even more families in the fifties and early sixties. Though it became less common in the later period, the sharing of apartments never entirely disappeared. It was quite often the case that young couples with one or two children could not get an apartment for eight to ten years. City council were permanently inundated with applicants who were put on endless waiting lists.
Husby and Tensta are some of the more notorious so-called “no-go zones” in Stockholm. I’ve been to both of them multiple times, passing through. Believe me, they are leafy and pleasant. Most of the pictures you see on the internet are taken during the winter, and often in narrow side-alleys to make it look much more grim than they are, to undergird the narrative of “oppressed/betrayed migrants”.
The Australian Swedish connection.
1 in 5 Chinese American girls is a foreign born adoptee
What a blatant lie!
What a blatant lie! Replies: @Blinky Bill
1 in 5 Chinese American girls is a foreign born adoptee
There are 5 million Chinese Americans and 80 thousand adoptions in total from China in the last 20 years. 1500 adoptions from China in 2018. How can you possibly make the math work ? Make America Think Harder !
http://www.aafederation.org/doc/AAF_StateofAsianAmericanChildren.pdfReplies: @Blinky Bill
Asian children are becoming more multiethnic and
multiracial.
• Asian children were more likely to be female than children
in the general population.
• Asian children were less likely to be foreign-born than
Asian adults. About 7 percent of Asian children under the
age of 5 were foreign born.
• Over 1 in 5 Chinese American girls were adoptees, while
only 1 in 40 Chinese American boys were adopted.
http://www.aafederation.org/doc/AAF_StateofAsianAmericanChildren.pdfReplies: @Blinky Bill
Asian children are becoming more multiethnic and
multiracial.
• Asian children were more likely to be female than children
in the general population.
• Asian children were less likely to be foreign-born than
Asian adults. About 7 percent of Asian children under the
age of 5 were foreign born.
• Over 1 in 5 Chinese American girls were adoptees, while
only 1 in 40 Chinese American boys were adopted.
Do you know why they don’t show their math, because they haven’t done any !
^ Do you think you can do math better than these organizations?Replies: @Blinky Bill, @Hhhd
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2008-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS)
Replies: @Audacious Epigone
1 in 5 Chinese American girls is a foreign born adoptee
Does anyone else believe this statement ? Twinkie, Thulean Friend, Audacious Epigone. I shall defer to those who know more about the United States than I. It just seems outlandish to me.
1 in 5 Chinese American girls is a foreign born adoptee
^ Do you think you can do math better than these organizations?Replies: @Blinky Bill, @Hhhd
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2008-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS)
That’s a remarkable statistic more than 20% of all the Chinese girls in America are adopted from overseas. Out of a population of 5 million Chinese Americans. I just don’t know what to say.
I have just done the math myself and come to the conclusion it is 1
in 10 or about 10%. I won’t quibble the difference, so I concede the point and apologize. I still find this number shocking. If prior to my research I had to guess I would have said it was in the vicinity of 1-2%.
They had different budgets. I'm not sure if space actually showed up in the budgets of countries outside the USSR to a substantial degree - although Canada, a vassal of the US, seems to have been contributory to the US program. See for instance, the "Canada arm", a technology first developed for the shuttle.
The space programme had a direct bearing on FSU, not on all of the broader Warsaw Pact countries. Second, many Warsaw Pact countries had in fact quite liberal cultural policies
I believe that one country’s nationalism helps build and maintain that of its neighbors, just as one country’s poz helps poz its neighbors.
To the extent that your neighbour’s nationalism is aimed at you, sure, it certainly helps building the case for domestic nationalists as it gives them a strong and credible threat immediately placed on the country’s borders.
Were non-FSU countries in the Warsaw Pact threatened that they’d be taken over by the Soviets in any serious sense? I don’t know enough about these countries to give an intelligent answer.
What about “positive” nationalism of the kind you mentioned, i.e. pride of accomplishment?
In Sweden, Sputnik is portrayed as a Russian achievement, by which I mean Russian speakers of East Slavic origin. Maybe it was propagandised differently behind the Iron Curtain, but that is how it was and still is perceived here.
It could be that one of the main attack vectors of poz was English language acquisition, and being required to learn Russian put a damper on this.
Language is central to influence. Which is why Indian English-speaking elites are far more westernised than Chinese elites.
Does anyone know what accounts for Russia’s relatively poor economic performance?
Pizza followed by Vodka !
Thank god for Vladimir Putin !!!
We are certainly in full agreement here, which is why Russophobia in Western Europe is probably a disguised benefit for Russia in this sense without many of them even being aware of it.
If western Europe had opened its borders to Russia, the country would probably never have developed a sustainable economic model that provides for its citizens, and emigration would have become a self-reinforcing problem, as it has become in the rest of Eastern Europe.
Russia's economic performance has been pathetic compared to its impressive human capital. That is an inescapable conclusion. I don't buy the excuses being offered (resource curse, legacy of communism). Deng had a far crazier system to contend with than any of the Russian "reformers" yet he did a fantastic job whereas Russians largely destroyed their own society.One could argue that the West certainly cheered on this process - and I wouldn't dispute that it was occuring in quite a few capitals - but I am skeptical that Russia would have acted differently if the roles were reversed. If Russia could have achieved primacy by gutting a main geopolitical rival, it would have done so. Yet it got gutted itself because it was the weaker one and remains so. Such is life. The more interesting question is why is this persistent weakness never going away? Why is Russia incapable of ever rising to the same level as the West?I'm warming to the idea of the O-ring theory. Small differences throughout a long chain make a very large cumulative impact in the end. There may not need be major differences in human capital for there to be major consequences. Russia also had a fairly well-educated workforce in Soviet times compared to some other EE countries (as can be seen in PIAAC 2013 for the over-55 age group) so they had a fairly high base once the wall fell. That makes the failure of Russian policymakers even more bizarre and puzzling.Replies: @iffen, @216, @Tom67, @Denis
Russia is a growing country, and it takes a long period of consistent economic development to equal first world countries in all metrics recorded by international agencies, with very few countries successfully doing so.
Hi Thulean friend
Thanks a lot for the informed commentry. Really I despair when I have to read Karpins nonsense time and again on Unz. All these faux and ultimately meaningless statistics which he carefully selects and then selectively reads to make preconceived points. I believe readers of Unz are anyhow already way beyond believing the anti Russian drivel that the mass media shower us with. No need to paint Russia and her situation in better colours than she deserves. Fact of the matter is that Putin did indeed do a lot of good and things are incomparably better than in the Nineties. But now the regime has ossified and there is a lot of bad things going on. Especially if you are young and ambitious and not of either a good family or with Western contacts (like Karlin) things are getting worse.
I had a long and frank talk with a lawyer in St.Petersburg. He is a Russian patriot (maybe he shouldn´t tell these things to a foreigner he said to me) and from a “good” that is KGB family. His father served with Putin in East Germany so there is nothing to fear for him personally. He told me that the criminal police and the tax authorities are running absolutely wild. He says it is like a new 37. Surely some hyperbole but what is happening is that small entrepeneurs (of course not Oligarchs with Kremlin connections) are accused of some arbitrary criminal offense and then shaken down. It is a mass phenomenen and in court his clients always win in the end. But things rarely get to court.Most people fold before they get their day in court and simply pay. The reason being that they are put in pre trial detention where conditions are so bad (food, sanitary conditions and medical care) that they rather give up than come back with damaged health.There is no torture but what the authorities do as well is put the most obstinate in a cell with hardened criminals and then promise these criminals a partial pardon if the accused confess to whatever they were accused of.
I don´t know nor think that these things originate with the Kremlin. They are more the result of a certain hyper capitalism that is understood as making money by any means possible.
If you further consider the abysmal pay in Universities (no tenure on top) and the fact that these small companies that are being if not destroyed than severely hampered were an important outlet for young gifted Russians you understand why lot´s of young Russian would immediately leave when given the chance. The good thing for Russia though is that there are not given the chance. It is anything but easy to gain a foothold in the West. Crazy but true it is easier to claim asylum in Europe for any iliterate Arab than it is to gain a work visa for a highly qualified Russian.
SO THANKS AGAIN THULEAN FRIEND.
In Orwell "1984", statements of this kind are called duckspeaks.
I had a long and frank talk with a lawyer in St.Petersburg. He is a Russian patriot (maybe he shouldn´t tell these things to a foreigner he said to me) and from a “good” that is KGB family. His father served with Putin in East Germany so there is nothing to fear for him personally. He told me that the criminal police and the tax authorities are running absolutely wild. He says it is like a new 37..
This concerns HIV/drug/murder rates, not the demographics of non-European minorities with the possible exceptions of Copenhagen and some Northern European cities like Edinburgh or Helsinki.Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
These metrics look better in Moscow but still worse than they do in Berlin, Munich, Vienna, Stockholm, Copenhagen etc.
Russia’s still relatively high (but rapidly falling) murder rates are the result of people knifing each other to death in zapois, not street banditry.
Those sorts of degenerates are, unfortunately, the least likely to emigrate. But happily they are not much of a public menace these days.
Keeping away from those degenerates, and functionally, Moscow is probably safer than most major West European cities.
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/moscow-worlds-safest-megacity-for-women/
https://twitter.com/akarlin88/status/1171877275844960261
While there are still many areas in which it would make sense for young professionals to move from Russia or even Moscow to certain Western technopolises, things like crime or AIDS certainly aren’t one of them.
Moscow is as safe as European cities were before Europe committed suicide by letting in “refugees” from real shitholes. But even now many European cities are safer than most American cities. Heck, Mexico city, Buenos Aires, and Lima (at least the downtown, don’t know about barrios/favelas) are safer than most US cities.
Moscow is probably safer than most major West European cities
Emigration rates in V4 countries have declined quite a bit compared to 5-7 years ago, in no small part because rising convergence. Though I am skeptical to how much that convergence can continue (as I've outlined in other posts and won't repeat here). So it is not the case that this is a universal truth even for EE countries. Sweden's net emigration rate is very low for native Swedes. And even there, many are 2nd gen immigrants going to the "home country" for their retirement but with a Swedish pension. Or Swedish pensioners going to Portugal etc.
Modern young people are simply more inclined to explore than any other generation.
There are still multiple pain points for Russians wishing to emigrate. If a number of big Western countries made unilateral visa liberalisation moves towards Russians, it would massively lower the barriers of exit, both in terms of leaving but perhaps even more crucially in terms of staying unless one finds a job right away.
Often when they say they want to leave, it means they want to study or work abroad for a year or two and then return. Alternatively, some will leave with the intention of it being permanent and find the West not to meet their expectations, and then return.
Western stagnation is a fair point, but stagnating at a level where the average nominal wage is ~5X higher (corrected for working hours). This is the central, uncomfortable fact. And I don't see Russia closing that gap any time soon. In fact, ever. So if that gap stays fairly constant, possibly closing to 4X at best, then the incentive will be there. People overestimate national concerns and underestimate economic ones. The big barriers to large-scale Russian emigration is not national pride but bureaucratic hurdles still in place. If these get lifted, emigration will accelerate substantially.
Also your assertion that Russian stagnation will make emigration more enticing is suspect, as the vast majority of the Western world is economically stagnating.
Russia's growth has seen recent revisions which are not uncontroversial. The household income has seen declines for five years straight. https://i.imgur.com/ww7z3XG.jpg
Russia has higher economic growth than France, Germany, and Italy. Life in the West is becoming increasingly hard to navigate for anyone other than skilled professionals, and even for them conditions are declining.
I certainly think that SPB and Moscow will draw in a significant fraction of the Russian elite, but many of would-be emigrants are from lower strata of society, hence my previous comment about AK's socio-economic profile blinding him. If you're a bottom-40% income earner, you pay through your nose in rent in Moscow but you don't earn that well. You are sharing housing estates with lots of central asian moslems, and let's not forget that HIV/drug issues are still much bigger problems in Russia. Homicide rate is still substantially higher. These metrics look better in Moscow but still worse than they do in Berlin, Munich, Vienna, Stockholm, Copenhagen etc.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @Anatoly Karlin, @AP
I suspect the contrary will happen, and as the 2020s role on, Russians will be ever less interested in leaving as Russian cities improve, quality of life continues to rise, and swpl culture takes root outside of Moscow and St.P - all while the West becomes increasingly unstable and unattractive.
Russia relative to Europe now is probably much like Hungary was relative to Europe on the eve of EU accession – 4x wage differential, low foreign language proficiency, not much of a diaspora community (unlike, say, the Poles). So I expect its emigration profile would likewise approximate Hungary’s, as opposed to either Poland’s then, or the Ukraine’s today… in the magical scenario that the EU institutes open borders and free labor markets with Russia right this instance.
Russia in the past 5 years has undergone a period of fiscal and monetary tightening, i.e. exchanging the political capital from Crimea to build up immunity to sanctions. So economic performance over the past 5 years, during which is has indeed underperformed the V4, is not indicative of future prospects.
Using China’s economic growth as a stick to beat Russia with is really quite distasteful. The expression used by Xi and other Chinese officials is to describe the relationship as a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between Russia and China. What is good for one is good for the other, especially in an economic sense. China can truly be a driver for Russian economic growth and vice versa. There is immense good will towards Russia from all strata of Chinese society from the Standing Committee to the common man. They understand that they both face common obstacles and challenges.
Using Russia’s economic growth as a stick to beat China with is really quite distasteful. The expression used by Putin and other Russian officials is to describe the relationship as a союзник between Russia and China. What is good for one is good for the other, especially in an economic sense. Russia can truly be a driver for Chinese economic growth and vice versa. There is immense good will towards China from all strata of Russian society from the Duma to the common man. They understand that they both face common obstacles and challenges.
Stabbings are an everyday occurrence in London these days, depressing.
Your average Chinaman is far less likely to get stabbed by a vibrant that they haven’t collected from all over the Third World. So at least they have that going for them.
Wogs start at Calais. 😉
Why are you people seemingly intent on Russia becoming a mining colony/natural resource appendage and tourist trap for the West.
It’s called doing business. Australia a Western Country has done very well at it and is never described as such !
Well ... hardly ever.
It’s called doing business. Australia a Western Country has done very well at it and is never described as such !
Scratch a Slav, find a Mongol 👱=👲 LOL
Expect the eradication of all of the it’s remaining population control policies within a year. But will it make any difference ? Will the Chinese respond more positively to incentives than Westerners have ? What about coercion ? Next population census in 2020 will be pivotal for future population policy in PRC. Hard decision will need to be made soon !!
Harbin is also very nice during this time of the year, but I must admit nowhere near as picturesque as St. Petersburg or Stockholm.
I don’t want to dox myself. But I will answer with a name Yul Brynner. I hope you understand. A man of your intellect should easily be able to decipher that.
I hope you know that geographically Siberia and the Far East aren´t equivalent. You are citing almost exclusively subejcts of the federation that aren´t Siberian. YOu are comparing apples with pairs.
As to “equivalent” regions: Saskatshewan, Manitoba and Alberta would be equivalent to Siberia in terms of climate, land use and ressource extraction.
Well according to Wikipedia the three provinces together had about 7 million inhabitants. Siberia without the Far east is about 24 Million but much, much bigger. Even if you include the Far East you get no more than 30 Million. I am amazed how little you know your own country. But then you are a Muscovite and like Thulefriend very truly said: Moscow is another planet. I just wish you wouldn´t just make up things as you go along.
Most of my nationalist friends/acquaintances are right-wing intellectuals or effete homosexual types, not the brutal skinhead types.
I think they have mostly been killed off by alcohol and krokodil by now.
How come no results for Vietnam? They did quite well in 2015 and they participated for 2018 as well. As for Mainland China part of the reason for their surge is the replacement of mediocre Guangdong with top educational province Zhejiang
this ‘asians yellow’ graph thing is starting to be wrong – about half of them are indians, who are brown.
Partly correct. Indian immigrants in the U.S. are highly selected – 70+% with tertiary education, 40% with graduate degrees (from a country where about 15% of the population has college degrees). And they have grown explosively in the last couple of decades in number in the West. However, half is overblown. They are about 20% of the Asian population in the U.S.
the main driver of this phenomenon is the upper class people in China and India using the west as an escape valve. that’s mainly what’s going on.
the smart ones are exiting in greater numbers. they aren’t getting any smarter. just concentrating in the west.
Indians, yes. Chinese, no longer true. More than 90 percent of Chinese students in the U.S. return to China. And as Chinese “tier-one” cities become first world area (in some ways world class), Chinese cognitive elites are increasingly concentrating in such cities, not in the West (though Chinese financial elites often invest in the West and perhaps even obtain permanent residency in the latter as a hedge against instability/political changes back home).
We’ve already seen this with Japanese and Korean immigrants. The former are miniscule in number and the latter are drying up (forget the fall in the rate of increase – between the last two Censuses, the absolute number of people identifying as Korean in the U.S. fell). This is likely to happen with Chinese immigrants, barring any sudden change in China.
Finno-Ugrics are Asians.
Oh, really? In Russia every year there is a competition "miss student of Finno-Ugria" among the girls of Finno-Ugric ethnic groups., where compete in knowledge of native language, ability to sing native songs, the ability to write poems in their native language etc. This is not a competition for big tits and long legs, but a competition for knowledge of native culture. Here are the contestants
Finno-Ugrics are Asians.
China Swede was a derogatory term used for Finnish immigrants in the United States during the early 1900s, particularly in Minnesota and Michigan.
👱 = 👲
Olli (Olof) Kiukkonen Kinkkonen (June 10, 1880 – September 18, 1918) was a Finnish-American dockworker and logger. He was lynched in Duluth, Minnesota on September 18, 1918.
Yeah, but he was lynched not because he was a Finn, but because he refused to fight in World War 1.
Which is actually one of the dumbest possible reasons to lynch someone.
Imagine being so gay that you support Woodrow Wilson’s war effort. The people who did it must have been proto-boomers.
It’s called doing business. Australia a Western Country has done very well at it and is never described as such !
Well … hardly ever.
820 pound wild hog killed in Alabama:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/nation-world/ct-wild-hog-alabama-20170720-story.html
I’ve seen much bigger hogs in Minnesota. Wolves get eaten by them.
And who the hell is immigrating to Saudi Arabia?
Either highly skilled professionals, mostly from the West, or largely South Asian labourers. However, there has been a growing share of South Asian professionals in the gulf countries, too.
If you look at Mauritius (50% Indian population, and not drawn from their high-caste elite), their top 5% performs around the same as the OECD in TIMSS. In Singapore, Indians are mostly drawn from the descendants indentured labour class, at least up to 1990, yet were earning almost 90% of what Chinese did in 1990 and now outearn them.
India and South Asia in general are really bad at educating their youth at home, but they tend to do okay abroad.
A bit of context for those who are not familiar with China and its population distribution: Shanghai (25 million), Beijing (21 million), Zhejiang Province (56 million) and Jiangsu Province (80 million). For these four municipal cities and provinces alone, we are talking about a population size of 185 million people in total, roughly 60% of all U.S. population.
My thinking about the skinsuit game was way too simplistic.
As I once said Audie-San, your potential is impressive.
Blacks obviously didn’t vote for Ben Carson, and they’re not going to vote for a silver-spooned wannabe quadroon just because she expects them to.
Maybe if Biden wasn’t in the race, she’d have been the black candidate.
No Sir, Kamala, is, was and always will be a white woman’s candidate.And Corey Booker is a White man’s. If Gropy-Joe were not in the race it would be Bernie Sanders. E.W. has not an ounce of charisma or likeability and is not EASILY tieable to anything. Black people like totems with charisma; Bill Clinton was the “loveable country redneck”, Barry was the “Black dude who not going to make an ass of himself like my family.” Gropy Joe is “the dumb, old white guy I work with on the dock who is funny, and eats BBQwith us once in a while”, and Bernie is “That crazy old white liberal who ain’t gon’ do shit, but it sounds good.”
What’s Kamala’s totem? shit if I can tell. Probably, “onea them uptown mulatto heffers who thinks she’s better than us..”
Even Lizzie is “That nice ol’ white lady who approved my benefits.” What’s
The fatal flaw in heralding Harris was not realizing this. It’s also the fatal flaw in the steady stream of predictions that have been made over the last several months about Biden’s impending collapse. It’s not just that blacks don’t care about his dottering gaffes or alleged political missteps in the past–it’s that they view the reactions to these things that are unfavorable to Biden as attacks on their guy and thus on themselves. Harris learned that the hard way.
President Obama’s Kenyan/Kansan heritage makes him about as authentically African American as one can be but, in some camps, his “racial bona fides” — son of an African immigrant, and a white mother who raised him in Asia and then sent him to grow up with his white grandparents in Hawaii — suggest he is not culturally “black enough.”
Now, it turns out that Barack Obama is apparently descended from a slave – on his mother’s side.
The genealogy Web site Ancestry.com has done research that they say confirms that Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother, is descended from a historically significant Virginia slave named John Punch. The Web site’s archival and DNA research supports the theory that descendants of Punch, one of very few Africans in early Colonial Virginia, were white landowners in Virginia and ancestors of Kansas-born Dunham — who would be a great-great-great-great–great-great-great-great-great-great grandchild of the unlucky Punch.
One more reason to love Barry Dunham. 50.00000000001%
As I once said Audie-San, your potential is impressive.
My thinking about the skinsuit game was way too simplistic.
Blacks obviously didn’t vote for Ben Carson, and they’re not going to vote for a silver-spooned wannabe quadroon just because she expects them to.
No Sir, Kamala, is, was and always will be a white woman's candidate.And Corey Booker is a White man's. If Gropy-Joe were not in the race it would be Bernie Sanders. E.W. has not an ounce of charisma or likeability and is not EASILY tieable to anything. Black people like totems with charisma; Bill Clinton was the "loveable country redneck", Barry was the "Black dude who not going to make an ass of himself like my family." Gropy Joe is "the dumb, old white guy I work with on the dock who is funny, and eats BBQwith us once in a while", and Bernie is "That crazy old white liberal who ain't gon' do shit, but it sounds good."
Maybe if Biden wasn’t in the race, she’d have been the black candidate.
Don’t you think Yang could have a shtick?
“The Asian guy who owns the dollar mart who likes to be very helpful by walking behind me down every aisle.”
No?
Peace.
More like "The Asian guy who owns the liquor store and won't give me a discount an shot my cousin Lamarr b/c he fuckin' rayciss."
Don’t you think Yang could have a shtick?
“The Asian guy who owns the dollar mart who likes to be very helpful by walking behind me down every aisle.”
China is the future and it is very bleak, one of raceless, borderless globalism and a technological dystopia.
What’s happening to the Uyghurs at the moment is being reported because it is intended as a warning to anyone else who thinks they can resist the coming global society. The UN visited some of the concentration camps that Uyghurs are being held in and gave their approval, which tells you all you need to know. This is sanctioned by the globalists/global elite and is the future of the world as a whole.
Maybe that the US is full of shit and all the anger about what's going in a foreign steppe is 100% astroturfed?
which tells you all you need to know
Some of you are reading too much into this test. Reality check:1. PISA clearly doesn't measure school standards only (as your NY Times reader would argue), but it just as clearly doesn't measure intelligence only (as many in this thread seem to argue). Does anyone truly believe that ethnic Swedes are genetically worse at math than ethnic Germans and Dutchmen? A simpler answer is that we do worse than them because our school system teaches math worse than theirs (this I can well believe).2. It's a test based on samples, so to compare very near results as if they were cut in stone is silly. PISA will have done its utmost, of course, to get representative samples. But samples they are, which means that they come with error margins.3. Beyond this, we also have an unknown cultural variable than will cloud the results. Even basic things like translations will always distort the original text in more or less subtle ways, and as Mr. Scientism tweeted the other day, actual cultural differences go far deeper than this:
Natives-only scores. Western Europeans perform better than White Americans on the most g-loaded test, math: ...
4. Motivation also factors in: the gap between a weak performing group and a strong will in part come down to effort. This is also true within countries. My hunch -- or vain hope -- is that immigrants do worse than natives partly from lack of effort (the virgin helicopter parent versus the chad patriarch).Replies: @songbird, @AaronB, @Thulean Friend, @reiner Tor
We talk about culture like it's just literature, dress, cuisine, etc, but it includes categorization and predication, presuppositions, paradigms, frames, metaphors, idioms, etc. A particular culture thinks in a particular way. It will make some inferences more easily than others.
My hunch — or vain hope — is that immigrants do worse than natives partly from lack of effort
Am I reading Unz or the usual leftist blank slate talking points I am accustomed to getting in the mainstream press? You have an impressionable mind.
Even basic things like translations will always distort the original text in more or less subtle ways
East Asians have consistently been at the very top in reading scores in PISA in all years. Not as well as in math but still at the world class level. Furthermore, why would 2nd gen migrants who are fluent in the native language do worse because of some diffuse “cultural factors” in a non-English speaking country? That’s nonsense on stilts.
Does anyone truly believe that ethnic Swedes are genetically worse at math than ethnic Germans and Dutchmen? A simpler answer is that we do worse than them because our school system teaches math worse than theirs
You’re comparing a set of people who are extremely similar genetically, so yes I do tend to agree with you here. But PISA for the most part does not test groups who are extremely similar genetically. You’re taking an edge case in trying to explain the general pattern. Never a good idea.
Nobody here, as far as I am aware, argues for a 100% hereditian framework. But PISA is very g-loaded, as Rindermann has showed many years back (close to 0.80 or more IIRC), so while there is room for culture among very similar populations (like Northern Germanic nationalities), to argue that culture would be on equal standing with more harder constraints for the overall population would obviously be silly. Though, in fairness, you have not made that argument (yet).
That is indeed unlikely, and also not my view. My point about cultural differences -- which by the way go well beyond language -- mainly relates to differences between countries.
East Asians have consistently been at the very top in reading scores in PISA in all years. Not as well as in math but still at the world class level. Furthermore, why would 2nd gen migrants who are fluent in the native language do worse because of some diffuse “cultural factors” in a non-English speaking country? That’s nonsense on stilts.
I haven't, you're right -- and I won't. My main point is that these should be seen as very crude figures. Africa is clearly well behind south-east Asia, with Europe somewhere in between. But variations within these regions might simply be noise.
You’re comparing a set of people who are extremely similar genetically, so yes I do tend to agree with you here. But PISA for the most part does not test groups who are extremely similar genetically. You’re taking an edge case in trying to explain the general pattern. Never a good idea.
Nobody here, as far as I am aware, argues for a 100% hereditian framework. But PISA is very g-loaded, as Rindermann has showed many years back (close to 0.80 or more IIRC), so while there is room for culture among very similar populations (like Northern Germanic nationalities), to argue that culture would be on equal standing with more harder constraints for the overall population would obviously be silly. Though, in fairness, you have not made that argument (yet).
Bezos was born Jeffrey Preston Jorgensen on January 12, 1964, in Albuquerque, the son of Jacklyn Gise Jorgensen and Ted Jorgensen. At the time of his birth, his mother was a 17-year-old high school student, and his father was a bike shop owner. After Jacklyn divorced Ted, she married Cuban immigrant Miguel “Mike” Bezos in April 1968. Shortly after the wedding, Mike adopted four-year-old Jorgensen, whose surname was then changed to Bezos.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/did-jeff-bezos-ever-list-himself-as-hispanic/
It would be a perfect opportunity to grab ethnically Russian regions.
Felix Keverich
Maybe that the US is full of shit and all the anger about what's going in a foreign steppe is 100% astroturfed?
which tells you all you need to know
What are the surprises? I can only think of a few. Igbos of Nigeria and Kikuyus of Kenya have higher IQs than the African average.Replies: @Korenchkin, @Blinky Bill
One of the nice things about HBD is that there are few surprises that go against intuition
Persians surprising to some and Tamil Brahmins perhaps another ?
Well sorry, the last century was nothing but propaganda telling me Slovenians and Croats are my South Slavic "brothers", but now they seem to not be since they don't fit your claim
Only if you include Slovenia and Croatia, who seem to be outliers in the Balkan region
Like Svevlad said in the previous thread, our bell curve is probably inverse at this point due to an incredibly dysgenic 20th Century
IQ data that “proves” non-whites are unintelligent but get very defensive and even angry when someone points out data that “proves” that same thing about certain white groups
I don’t recall any Kyrgyz Pupin, Tesla or Milankovic
One of Anatoly Karlins favourites 😅 is the best the Kazakhs could produce.
Colonel Kanatzhan “Kanat” Alibekov (Kazakh: Қанатжан Әлібеков, Qanatzhan Älibekov; Russian: Канатжан Алибеков, Kanatzhan Alibekov; born 1950) – known as Kenneth “Ken” Alibek since 1992 – is a former Soviet physician, microbiologist, and biological warfare (BW) expert. He rose rapidly in the ranks of the Soviet Army to become the First Deputy Director of Biopreparat, where he oversaw a vast program of BW facilities. Also a turncoat.
No doubt many commenters will criticize this article as another “chi-com” propaganda and Chinese shills, but invariably, the critiques will fail to appreciate the deep and profound importance Chinese place on education for thousands of years. In addition to the civil exam (keju) that the author mentions, consider a few of the following historical factoids:
1. Confucius was the first in the world to found a private school over 2000 years ago, without the support of any government fund. Further, he proposed the idea (有教无类) that all people, regardless of status, class or background (even for slave), should be allowed to receive education. It was an idea that was so well ahead of time. In addition, he did not require any students to pay any tuition – everyone could pay according to what they could afford: a piece of silver, a sack of rice, some chores or nothing at all.
2. Mencius, another great philosopher in the Warring State, set another example of the role of education. His mother had to move their place of residence three times because the neighborhood was not conducive to learning. One time, the young Mencius skipped class from school. The mom took out a scissor and cut a piece of painstakingly weaved fabric (their main income) into pieces. It taught the young Mencius that skipping classes was like cutting fabric: they disrupted all previous efforts. This happened in an era when basic necessity of life was still scarce for almost everyone.
3. In Han dynasty, a poor young man loved to read very much. Since he had to work in the field during day time, the only time he could study was at night. But he could not afford the price of lamp oil, so whenever it got dark, it created a problem. Desperately, he found a method by drilling a hole in the wall so that he could read next to the hole under the light from the neighbor.
4. YueFei, the most renounced general from the Song dynasty (or the whole Chinese history) was also known to be studious since young. Unable to afford the writing material, he improvised by using tree branch to practice writing on sand spread out on the floor.
All these stories are still being taught to young students in Chinese schools today. To truly appreciate Chinese culture, people need to understand the centrality of education and the sacrifices they are willing to undertake. It is good that Internet has lowered the cost of learning tremendously, but even a few decades ago, I personally knew of a poor Chinese couple who were willing to spending their life-saving so that their son could receive a good education.
This is nothing to do with communism or PRC brainwashing.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/how-cossacks-culturally-appropriated-kazakhs/
You’re welcome 😉.
One of my favourite Russian songs performed by Kazakh smart fraction member Dimash. They sure wouldn’t invite Ken Alibek to the Kremlin.
Swedish Family & Thulean Friend,
Why are Swedes the Europeans with the most negative view of China? Pew – International Views of China
The most negative in the world, next to Japan.
I remember Frédéric Cho — Sweden’s best-known China expert — saying, a year or two ago, that much of China’s bad press in Sweden is an American import. When Washington views China favorably, so does Stockholm; when Washington ramps up the rhetoric, Stockholm — and Sweden’s public opinion — follows suit.
There is a lot of truth to this, and the same argument broadly holds for Russia. Another factor is what I call Sweden’s overidentification with social liberalism and the postwar world order, which, simply put, means that Swedes are scared to death of anything that smells of authoritarianism (as defined by liberal standards).
It simply may not had needed it. Buddhism came before Islam and before Buddhism there was no major religious rival. Of course, most Hindus did not think of themselves as Hindus simple on account of not needing it. Only when a rival religion arises, does your own distinctions become sharper.
Are we to believe that Hinduism had no dietary exclusions even though it had a rigid and ancient caste system?
Great question to which I have no answer. Perhaps the geographic isolation of Sri Lanka gave an upstart an edge, given that it was harder for an incumbent to call in help from the outside than it was for someone on a large connected landmass. Just a guess, though.
And then, if diet allowed them to beat the Buddhists, how come it didn’t work in Sri Lanka?
Given how rapidly the indian population expanded and how fertile the Northern Ganges plain is, I am not sure if scarcity was their primary problem (parasitic load and diseases is more likely). Social exclusion, in Dr. Ambedkar's view, was the guiding light of the Brahmin class and when their social rule came under sustained attack, their conversion to vegetarianism became a useful social tool. If you think about it, many religions use food as a tool for social control. Certainly Islam and Judaism do. It becomes a way to mark out those on the outside. Moral justification is always given, but Ambedkar's theory is of course far less charitable, but nevertheless fascinating.Replies: @Thulean Friend, @songbird
Scarcity and social exclusion seem like the most convincing explanations.
These may all be academic and historical debates, but this caste system has very real repercussions even up to our time. These past few weeks, there have been a wave of rapes in the news in India. Two stand out. One in Hyderabad, another in Unnao.
In Hyderabad, four underclass rapists went after a veterinarian Hindu woman. Some of the rapists were moslem. The Indian police summarily executed them to great public cheering after an intense period of ourage in the media.
Another case happened in Unnao, Uttar Pradesh. There, the rapists were five high-caste men(four Trivedi and one Bajpai) who raped a victim of lower social standing. When she bravely decided to book them for their crimes, and went on her own to the courtroom for the trial, they intercepted her and burned her alive. She managed to run 1 km(!) before she collapsed. The doctors tried to save her life but she died a few days ago.
Nothing has yet happened to them and the media is far more circumspect. There is some discussion in the media but far from the intensive outrage. While the caste system is not as blatant for the most part in India in the manner it was during Dr. Ambedkar’s life, it is very much present in the social fabric and it rears its ugly head from time to time.
A lot of that expansion had to do with New World crops - potatoes and peanuts. The amount of calories and protein available increased significantly. Then, on top of that, one must also add new varieties of old crops bred by Europeans to have much higher yields, and new agricultural techniques, like artificial nitrogen fixation. Despite all that, India received food aid for a long time.
Given how rapidly the indian population expanded and how fertile the Northern Ganges plain is, I am not sure if scarcity was their primary problem
A lot of that expansion had to do with New World crops - potatoes and peanuts. The amount of calories and protein available increased significantly. Then, on top of that, one must also add new varieties of old crops bred by Europeans to have much higher yields, and new agricultural techniques, like artificial nitrogen fixation. Despite all that, India received food aid for a long time.
Given how rapidly the indian population expanded and how fertile the Northern Ganges plain is, I am not sure if scarcity was their primary problem
The thing that I find fascinating about caste in India is how it seems to transcend religion. Christianity, Islam, and Sikhism all seem structurally more egalitarian, but each seems to perpetuate some idea of caste.
This is an excellent point. I have always found the distinction between the Ashraf, Ajlaf and Arzal in Subcontinental Islam both perplexing and fascinating. As you most definitely already know Razib Khan has written extensively about this and the Caste structures present in Sikhism and South Asian Christianity.
As someone who lives for more than one decade in China and works in education, your ideas about Chinese students and the education system here are hilarious, much as your other fiction about China. With your idea about the 三字经 and the role it would play in education I actually made my students laugh. Thanks for that.
Who knew Chingchong was a comedian?"That's gold, Jerry! GOLD!"Replies: @Blinky Bill
Men at their birth are naturally good.

We all know the effect that the emigration of Russians, German, and Koreans back to their respective homelands had on the Kazakhstani Smart fraction. But what about the immigration of the Kazakh Оралман (Returnees) from Russia, China, Mongolia and the other Stans back to Kazakhstan. What kind of cognitive profile do they possess ? We know that ethnic Russians in Kazakhstan possess a higher average IQ than those in Russia 103 Vs 100. What about ethnic Kazakhs in Russia and China, do they possess higher average IQs than their co ethnics at home ?
An additional question, is there a North-South cline for ethnic Kazakh IQ in Kazakhstan as we know exists for ethnic Russians in Russia or perhaps an East-West one? Can this be ascertained from present data by ignoring co-variables ? Anatoly/ Russosphere experts any Idea ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ili_Kazakh_Autonomous_Prefecture
https://openpsych.net/forum/attachment.php?aid=616
Differences in intelligence between ethnic minorities and Han in China. Richard Lynn, Helen Cheng.
The low Kyrgyz IQ of 85.7 is consistent with the IQ of 74.4 for Kyrgyzstan derived from 2009 PISA scores given by Lynn and Vanhanen (2012) and approximately the same as the IQ of 84.7 for Kazakhstan derived from 2009 PISA scores given byLynn and Vanhanen(2012) and closely similar to the IQ of 82.2 of Kazakhs in Kazakhstan obtained by Grigoriev and Lynn (2014).The low IQ of these peoples of central Asia confirms the work of Luria(1979) carried out in the early 1930s in which he concluded that their IQs are lower than those of European Russians.
Table 2
Ethnic | Loc | Pop | IQ | Ref
Hasake | Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and the Aksai Kazakh Autonomous County in Gansu Province | 1420458 | 99.4 | Hashan et al. (2003)
Hasake | . | . | 91.4 | Zhao et al. (1989)
Hasake | . | . | 95.4 | .
Kyrgyz | Kizilsu in Kirghiz Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region | 160823 | 85.6 | Ji et al. (1995)
Replies: @dux.ie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Ling
As a young and high-profile defector, the Chanyu held generous regard of Li Ling, giving Li his daughter's hand in marriage[3][4][5][6][7] and making Li Lord Youxiao (右校王), which was at the same level as Chanyu's chief adviser (and a notorious Han traitor), Wei Lü (衛律).
The Yenisei Kirghiz Khagans claimed Li Ling as their ancestor.[8][9][7]
Some archaeologists have tentatively identified a unique Han-Dynasty architecture palace discovered in Russia's Khakassia (southern Siberia) as the residence of Li Ling in the land of the Xiongnu.[7][10][11][12]
One example of the elite Human Capital that the Russians/Koreans have gifted Kazakhstan.

Gennadiy Golovkin was born on 8 April 1982, in the city of Karaganda in the Kazakh SSR, Soviet Union (present-day Kazakhstan) to a Russian coal miner father and Korean mother, who worked in a chemical laboratory.
I couldn’t even watch the video…
And this behavior from a civilization thousands of years older than ours in the west…
The west was actually the youngest of all the great civilizations as we started farming later than all of the others. We were a race of herders…Someone once said that is why we still have such a strong attachment to dogs and horses.
It’s a puzzlement.
Not to mention the forced organ donations from living people…
I don’t care what anyone says about the Chinese, there is definitely some critical element missing here, like empathy or something…
Deus vult!
Tu quoque!


Tu quoque!https://youtu.be/GSLBdThRsOkhttps://youtu.be/q9lPyT0HUIEReplies: @d dan, @Franklin Ryckaert
Deus vult!
It is amazing that a troll like @nymom could hijack a comment thread of article on education into slaughtering of animals.
I am sometime quite amazed by the shameless-ness of these anti-China trolls.
Dog eating has a long history of consumption in Asia including China and Korea as peasant food. However, the spread of religion such as Buddhism and Islam which prohibits the consumption of certain meats as well as the dawn of the Industrial Revolution saw an almost complete wipeout of the practice with isolated places in China in North Korea the only remaining places that have niche markets for it. The practice didn’t become mainstream knowledge until 2009 when the prefecture of Yulin, Guangxi Province in China started the 10 days long “Lychee and Dog Meat Festival” where festival-goers eat lychee fruit and dog meat. The festival was originally authorized by local officials as an attempt to draw in more tourists and businesses to the city. The city government has since distanced itself from the festival due to popular backlash over it. As well, there have been other dog meat festivals such as the Jinhua Hutou dog meat festival in East China’s Zhejiang province. But the Yulin festival has been the poster child due to its media coverage.
Facts:
The consumption of dog meat is limited to Yulin after the Jinhua Festival was banned in 2011.
The supply of dogs killed for the festival was <1000 in 2015
Survey results of Chinese living in Yulin about Dog eating:
72% have never eaten dog meat or rarely eat it.
28% eat it on a regular basis
12% percent eating it weekly
Chinese celebrities such as Chen Kun, Yang Mi, and Fan Bingbing have spoken out against it.
Peter Li, China policy specialist for HSI, said: “Despite the effort by dog traders to heavily promote the eating of dog for the last seven years, it’s clear that the majority of Yulin residents still don’t eat it on anything like a regular basis. The truth is that eating dog and cat is not part of China’s mainstream culinary practice even in Yulin, the home of the dog meat festival. We’ve already seen the Yulin authorities take steps to curb the sale of dog meat, so we hope that these survey results will encourage them to go even further. Far from being vital to the Yulin economy or way of life, the dog meat festival is a national disgrace that tarnishes the name of the city around the world. Now is the time to end it.”
Qin Xiaona, director of CAWA, said: “The survey results are encouraging. The survey tells the world that Yulin’s food culture is not defined by the local dog meat traders. Their cultural claim is not supported by the survey. Those of us who lived in Guangxi in the past know that dog meat consumption was a distasteful habit. You just did not cook dog meat in your own kitchen. The survey results should encourage the Yulin authorities to correct the misperception perpetrated by the dog meat industry by fostering a new and healthy food culture in line with the rapid progress in the rest of the country.”
Besides dogs, Chinese also eat : birds nests, shark fins, snakes, cats and monkeys.
Besides dogs, Europeans also eat : nerves, ears, frogs, cats and horses.

Human embryos are eaten “for health”.
Europeans eat people “for fun”.

Tu quoque!
This Japanese professor said that the Japanese were good copiers (like the Chinese), but were not good innovators, and he lamented the fact that, for all the studying, very few Nobel prize winners ever came out of Japan.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/japanese-win-another-nobel-prize-again/
Slaughtering people for organ theft is an official government industry.
Sorry, you are confusing China with “democratic” Kosovo. That’s what the US and its vassals created.
> is there a North-South cline for ethnic Kazakh IQ
Visually, yes. Using lots of assumptions, quantitatively also yes.
Using just simple regional data, region GPS from wiki, regression of IQ vs Latitude statistically significant,
IQkz = +59.45 +0.53*Lat; #n=14; Rsq=0.3986; p=0.01545 * (Sig)
The simple average of %Kaz+%Rus is 89.1%, with about 10.9% error margin iqnoring the contribution of the rest of the ethnics, the IQ contribution of Kaz and Rus,
IQkz = +86.11 -0.053*PctKaz +0.11*PctRus; #n=14; Rsq=0.7352; p=0.0006701 *** (VVSig)
Thus roughly, with margin of error of 10.9%, the average IQs of Native Kaz 80.8, Rus 97.1
With that rough estimate of native Kaz IQ, there are no N/S or E/W IQ clines. However for the Rus, there is strong N/S cline,
IQrus = +46.59 +0.72*Lat; #n=14; Rsq=0.4529; p=0.008351 ** (VSig)
and borderline E/W cline,
IQrus = +67.0 +0.22*Lon; #n=14; Rsq=0.2752; p=0.05411 . (Borderline)
Is it strange how high chinks are but now utterly medium russians are?
I cast doubt into this report.
Education means nothing without results anyway, and I don’t see much innovation or improvement coming from chinese technology.
The gaokao stats can be used to extrapolate from B-S-J-Z to other provinces. Places such as Guizhou , Qinghai, Guangxi, and even Guangdong (all places with genetics measurably different from BSJZ) do score much lower, but places such as Hunan Hubei & Hebei score better. Only that the gaokao is taken at age 18, and therefore automatically excludes the bottom few percent of the population who have already dropped out at that point.
Thank you for such a prompt and detailed response dux.ie. It is much appreciated !!
Plausible Scenarios Where Dems Clean House
Biden-Yang
Yielding to Yang 😂
Beautiful wreaths shown on the very last photo.
Quite symbolic, too. Russian tricolors and imperial coat of arms gently hugging a fallen Red Army solders monument dedicated to eleven army sappers, if I am not mistaken.
Time to heal wounds.
> What about ethnic Kazakhs in Russia and China, do they possess higher average IQs than their co ethnics at home ?
https://openpsych.net/forum/attachment.php?aid=616
Differences in intelligence between ethnic minorities and Han in China. Richard Lynn, Helen Cheng.
The low Kyrgyz IQ of 85.7 is consistent with the IQ of 74.4 for Kyrgyzstan derived from 2009 PISA scores given by Lynn and Vanhanen (2012) and approximately the same as the IQ of 84.7 for Kazakhstan derived from 2009 PISA scores given byLynn and Vanhanen(2012) and closely similar to the IQ of 82.2 of Kazakhs in Kazakhstan obtained by Grigoriev and Lynn (2014).The low IQ of these peoples of central Asia confirms the work of Luria(1979) carried out in the early 1930s in which he concluded that their IQs are lower than those of European Russians.
Table 2
Ethnic | Loc | Pop | IQ | Ref
Hasake | Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and the Aksai Kazakh Autonomous County in Gansu Province | 1420458 | 99.4 | Hashan et al. (2003)
Hasake | . | . | 91.4 | Zhao et al. (1989)
Hasake | . | . | 95.4 | .
Kyrgyz | Kizilsu in Kirghiz Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region | 160823 | 85.6 | Ji et al. (1995)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ili_Kazakh_Autonomous_Prefecture
“Ili (also as Yili; Chinese: 伊犁哈萨克自治州; pinyin: Yīlí Hǎsàkè Zìzhìzhōu) is an autonomous prefecture for Kazak people (in China)”
3 samples Avg Kazak Chinese IQ 95.4, max sample IQ 99.4 🙂
This is the region where the Han Dynasty Chinese general Li Ling and his army due to Han imperial court intriques and betrayals, defected to the Xiongnu and he was award as the second in command “Left Wing King” in that region,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Ling
As a young and high-profile defector, the Chanyu held generous regard of Li Ling, giving Li his daughter’s hand in marriage[3][4][5][6][7] and making Li Lord Youxiao (右校王), which was at the same level as Chanyu’s chief adviser (and a notorious Han traitor), Wei Lü (衛律).
The Yenisei Kirghiz Khagans claimed Li Ling as their ancestor.[8][9][7]
Some archaeologists have tentatively identified a unique Han-Dynasty architecture palace discovered in Russia’s Khakassia (southern Siberia) as the residence of Li Ling in the land of the Xiongnu.[7][10][11][12]
From what I've read, Northern Europeans are more adapted to alcohol, which make East Asians engaging binge-drinking "business culture" even more self-destructive. Though it is important to point out this "culture" was much more prevalent in specifically South Korea during the 60s-90s than it was in Japan or Taiwan at any time.I'm too lazy to dig up the relevant quotes on google books now, but I read an interesting book on Korea some years ago where the author goes into this quite a bit. Basically, if you were an ambitious 120+ IQ Korean male with some ambition during their boom years, your liver was simply going to take a huge blow by the time you were 40. There was no avoiding it unless you avoided career advancement.Then again, given Unz’s theories on East Asian IQ and how it seems impervious to nutritional effects, maybe we can chalk it up to the same pattern if it didn’t stop their ascent? It’s an fascinating HBD question.
One seems to hear a lot about business-related drinking in Japan, China, and Korea, but aren’t each of those populations better adapted to alcohol consumption than Northern Euros?
That's interesting. There's quite a bit of research on the negative effects of loneliness. Marriage is a big reason why some people live longer. Maybe there are unmeasured happiness gains here regarding sociability. East Asians strike me as fairly isolationist people in general, so it is fascinating how their drinking culture tends to be a lot more communitarian, karaoke as you mention being the perfect example. In Sweden, the stereotype was always that you either drink in huge quantities over the weekend (typically in bars with your friends) or you drink alone in some cottage in the forest. Only in recent years have we tried to import a 'continental' habit of drinking moderately over dinner with friends (we now consume more wine than beer, which is a historical oddity).Derbyshire mentioned in his China diaries that he was positively impressed by the activities that the elder Chinese were engaged with together as a group and seemed to have less of isolation problems we often have in the West. You read a lot about lonely elderly people in Japan, but I wonder if it is really that much worse than what we have. The single most shameful thing I am disgusted by with my culture is our tendency to abandon our elders and put them in elder homes and then largely forget about them.Replies: @songbird, @Brexit Brexit
Maybe, these one night karaoke benders just aren’t the same thing, as drinking vodka alone, on a Tuesday night.
The way I think it works is East Asians are better adapted to the presence of alcohol, meaning somewhat counter-intuitively that they have a worse reaction to drinking. It is this worse reaction, perhaps best typified by alcohol flush, which makes them less likely to be alcoholics. But the whole idea is that it was a trait which was selected due to a longer exposure to alcohol than Northern Europeans. So, it is not worse in the same way as how Amerinds might react to alcohol.
From wiki:
Approximately 30 to 50% of East Asians (Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans) show characteristic physiological responses to drinking alcohol that includes facial flushing, nausea, headaches and a fast heart rate
I could see why Southern China would be different than Europe, but in a way it seems strange that Japan and Korea are different. I wonder what explains it. These gradients of alcohol tolerance are really fascinating. I think I recall hearing that there is some gene that has a West to East gradient within Europe, but it was behind a paywall, so I never read the paper.
I agree, the stereotypical Asian respect for elders is something that they do right. Another thing, IMO, is the intact marriages.
Urban Chinese are really fascinating. It seems so bizarre that they can fall asleep in a noisy crowd. It is almost like they are better adapted for urban living, but, in that context, it is hard to explain their low TFR.
East Asians are on the far-end on the r-K scale among humans. Which is funny, given China's huge contemporary population. Though that is more due to very fertile soil in core historic Chinese population centers, which combined with Chinese contentiousness allowed for a higher social organisation (and thus, more easily supporting a larger population base given these conditions). We may recall that much of the Middle East bloomed once upon a time but much of this was destroyed due to human mismanagement. One particular pathology among many East Asian countries are their obscene property prices. True, the West's contemporary property prices are hardly rational either but we have high immigration to blame. Before that really started to kick in, housing was generally fairly affordable across the West whereas in East Asia you have either no or at best quite paltry immigration yet their housing prices are bonkers. IIRC, in China, a significant share of the local municipalities revenues come from land value transactions, which incentivices very high housing costs so that these municipalities can keep increasing their revenue. A sick and self-defeating system. Going to your point about fertility, aside from the r-K issue, very high housing costs delays family formation as their dating culture is very pragmatic/materialistic. A man must provide for his wife is still very much the norm. When housing is crazy that naturally puts a break on everything from the age of the first child to how many children to support. The Chinese state is also far less generous than the Swedish state is. Chinese women are pretty upfront with what they want and demand. Here in Sweden, our social norms are much more relaxed. I know plenty of men who either earn the same or less than their girlfriends and they still split the bill all the time. It's seen as a non-issue. That makes the economics of a relationship work easier given that most men in either society are not high-earners by mathematical inevitability of the bell curve. There's simply less stigma/prestige here and relationships don't revolve around money in the same way. It's similar in other Nordic countries. It'd be an interesting research topic if it has any relation to the Nordic countries' fairly eugenic fertility patterns.Replies: @Daniel Chieh
Urban Chinese are really fascinating. It seems so bizarre that they can fall asleep in a noisy crowd. It is almost like they are better adapted for urban living, but, in that context, it is hard to explain their low TFR.
It's because Chinese are mainly a third world people (and have ascended to industrialized proletariat only recently). They can still do some natural things like sleeping without laboratory conditions - e.g. Chinese workers can probably sleep on factory floor without a mattress. Similarly, many American pioneers in the 19th century, could pull wagons across the landscapes, fight with Indians, not eat food for days, and probably could still sleep easily outside with a rock as their pillow. Whereas nowadays, Americans - after a century of embourgeoisement - can unlikely sleep without air conditioning, and luxury Egyptian cotton sheets; and as in the Hans Christian Andersen, might detect a pea under a dozen mattresses. In Russia, there are a lot of memes (about 99% true) about tough peasant old grandmothers, who perhaps traverse frozen rivers each morning at age 85. But this is becoming a generational artifact even in such villages- their children might already be weak souls, who panic if their shoes become wet. When men's conditions improve, so does their sensitivity - in the end, the population of wealthy countries, might not sleep better, but simply become like princesses, puzzled that people could sleep with a pea in their bed.Replies: @songbird
Urban Chinese are really fascinating. It seems so bizarre that they can fall asleep in a noisy... better adapted
The miscegenation effect in the end overrides all Flynn effects.
Sometimes it goes down sometimes it goes up. Overall the assimilation of the various minority people’s has been a plus for the Russian Race and Nation. Example being Wildberries (Russian: ООО «Вайлдберриз») is the largest Russian online retailer. The company was founded in 2004 by Tatyana and Vladislav Bakalchuk. Mrs. Bakalchuk started the business in 2004 at age 28 in her Moscow apartment while on maternity leave from teaching. She realized how difficult it was for her and other young mothers to shop for clothes for themselves with a newborn at home. Her husband, Vladislav, an IT technician, soon joined her to help grow the business. In 2017 Wildberries had revenues for $1 billion,. In 2018 Wildberries works in 5 countries: Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia, with more than 20 000 employees.

Tatyana Vladimirovna Bakalchuk (Russian: Татьяна Владимировна Бакальчук; born on 16 October 1975) is a Russian entrepreneur of Korean ethnicity. Children 4.
Husband Vladislav Bakalchuk.
business-magazine.ba/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Tatjana_Bakalčuk_2.jpg
Ryan Giggs was born at St David’s Hospital in Canton, Cardiff, to Danny Wilson, a rugby union player for Cardiff RFC, and Lynne Giggs (now Lynne Johnson). Giggs is mixed race – his paternal grandfather is from Sierra Leone and has spoken of the racism he faced as a child. 😉
Frankly speaking, based on current trends, Europeans and Americans will become Eurasians much earlier. Here is the crowd in Vladivostok
Maybe Russians will eventually merge racially and maybe even politically with the East Asians and become literally Eurasians?
I doubt very much that this concept is popular in Russia.Replies: @Blinky Bill
Maybe that is why the concept of Eurasia is so popular in Russia?
Yielding to Yang 😂Replies: @Audacious Epigone
Plausible Scenarios Where Dems Clean House
Biden-Yang
That seems plausible to me. Yang’s support doesn’t overlap much with the rest of the Democrat field so he could legitimately pull some moderates to vote Democrat. He brings a lot of energy, he’s likable, youngish, and wrt diversity he’s only an Asian male, but a pair still beats high card and the other three guys in P/VP contention are old white men. Additionally, the prospect of a Yang president probably doesn’t scare anyone (Silicon Valley possibly excepted) much.
Looks electable to me.
Yang Gang 2020 !!!
This next debate will be pivotal to his campaign. Make or break, he needs to push for more speaking time regardless of how the moderators behave towards him.
No, Sever is correct, Moscow region and Moscow city are separate things, unless they changed the methodology specifically this year.
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/russia-pisa-results-2015/
Moscow (City) being just marginally above the Russian average would contradict results from PISA 2015 (fifth/~50 regions), PISA 2009 (substantially ahead of ~50 regions), and results from a massive Internet test (close third after SPB and Yaroslavl oblast out of all regions). It is highly unlikely.
PS. Even the guy you linked to earlier has the average Math performance of Russian >1M cities at 515, averaged over PISA 2009-18. Again, how is it plausible that Moscow – which has Russia’s highest percentage of people with tertiary education – would be below that?
https://twitter.com/JakubowskiEvid/status/1201980658832302093/
I assume this is because the cities of Saint Petersburg, Moscow and Sevastopol are their own federal subjects. But why are they subjects of their own to begin with? St. Pete and Moscow I can understand from their sheer size, but Sevastopol of some 450,000 people?Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
No, Sever is correct, Moscow region and Moscow city are separate things, unless they changed the methodology specifically this year.
Portugal imported African slaves that then mixed
Some Iberian’s have an Ethnic look to them that’s hard to place. For example this Spanish potato farmer.
The fact of the matter is Xinjiang is not Chinese land, it is Uyghur land and is part of Central Asia. Uyghurs are closely related people to Uzbeks and Kazakhs, etc.
The irony is Communists like the author of this article are normally extremely against imperialism of the sort that China is engaged in in the Uyghurs’ homeland, yet seem to make an exception for the Chinese and presumably other non-whites. Only “white man” bad in their view.
Sorry, you don't decide. Further, you don't seem to know that Han Chinese has been ruling Xinjiang much longer than Uighur has been there.
"The fact of the matter is Xinjiang is not Chinese land, it is Uyghur land and is part of Central Asia."
Yes, the "sort" of things that try to detoxify multiple CIA infiltration and disinformation, de-radicalize terrorism, stabilize the region and promoting trade, economic development and cultural exchange. These, of course, are Chinese sort of "imperialism", as "bad" as US and European countries bombing in Middle East and elsewhere, according to your view.
"... imperialism of the sort that China is engaged in in the Uyghurs’ homeland..."
Very unsurprising results for Spain and nothing much to comment on, especially the pervasive North-South (de)cline.
The lead of Navarre over the Basque Country is also an expected outcome, since the native population of both areas are very closely related but the Basque Country has a larger percentage of non-native inhabitants (~60% vs ~40% in Navarre, more or less).
Most of this non-native population descends from other regions of Spain and the rest are Latin Americans, Muslims, Romanians and others, probably in that order. So, in fact, both regions should do better without this immigrant component but this effect would be difficult to detect in an ordinary PISA breakdown of natives/immigrants, as an Andalusian would be a “native” in the Basque Country/Navarre.
The poor results in Catalonia are also probably explained by their high share of immigrants, perhaps even higher than the Basque Country with a larger component of non-Europeans, but PISA results are also heavily dependent on the quality of the education system and this is highly decentralized in Spain. Maybe the Catalan language zealotry they have adopted there is not helping them academically.
I’m not very sure about Portugal’s lag. But Spain would probably look much more like Portugal if it hadn’t had the Catalan and Basque industrial centers since the 19th century.
Appositely, we Calvinists dined at a Persian restaurant last night. The food was excellent, and the proprietor could not have been nicer, except for one moment. I asked if the traditional Persian yogurt-based drink called doogh was similar to an Indian lassi. I received an aggrieved look and a firm correction. (Actually, though, the doogh did taste like a salty lassi with some mint.)
Rest in peace and Thank you.
what you need are superchats, like they exist on Youtube.
Let people give you money, and in return, read out their chat message in front of an audience.
Just like youtubers do/did.
Excellent idea!!!
But since this is a text-oriented website, the “superchat messages” should probably be in written form. However, I’ll price them all very reasonably, say $1 each.
Let’s call them “comments”…
You can change it. Mr Unz upgraded the system.
These 10 countries top the ranks in chemistry research 2019
https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/these-ten-countries-top-the-ranks-in-chemistry-research
While the eight other nations in the top 10 have maintained their places since 2017, all except Spain have seen declines in their chemistry output.
In the Medieval case, it would be cheaper to buy fresh meat than to dump spices on it.
That’s actually a good point.
Between North and South Europe, there is of course very significant average physical appearance differences. But between Northern European races, there is not much physical difference - just different distributions or mixes of types. In different nationalities of North Europe, you visually notice much more nationality from body language, than physical appearance. For example, I work in a country in North West Europe. This summer I was walking in a noisy, crowded street in a crowded city, and saw a group of people about 50 metres further, and my unconscious said "oh Russian there". And then when they are much closer, they are of course speaking Russian. Your unconscious perceives nationality by bodylanguage even from a long distance, but you can't explain consciously what it is that is different.Replies: @Colin Wright, @Mikel, @Swedish Family
Europeans have a very keen eye for subtle regional differences in appearance.
people in Cantabria and La Rioja look like the same mix of types as Pais Vasco people
Well, as Swedish Family says, we Europeans are capable of easily identifying our neighbors (apparently East Asians can also distinguish themselves from each other while they all look similar to me, it must be a global phenomenon) but of course this ability is lost as we travel away from our part of the continent.
If I went to Saint Petersburg I guess I would be unable to say who is a native Ingrian/Karelian and who descends from other parts of Russia but I’m pretty sure locals can detect that difference and if I spent some time in the region I could probably acquire that ability too.
You are trying to do the same exercise here and jumping to hasty conclusions from a couple of visits.
Apparently, in the times when the Basque Country had not been flooded by immigrants from other Spanish regions foreigners were also able to see a difference in physical traits. Both John Adams, the second president of the US, and French writer Victor Hugo visited the Basque Country in the early 19th century and took it for granted that, unlike our neighbors, we were Celts.
https://www.constitution.org/jadams/ja1_04.htm
As it happens, both were wrong. We are not Celts and the main relationship we have with them (or with the current inhabitants of Celtic speaking areas, to be more precise) is that we are largely unadmixed descendants from the peoples who lived in the westernmost part of Europe during the early Iron Age. But still, I can say who is Basque and who is Spanish and be right ~90% of the time. Some Spaniards, especially in the North, also have little post-Iron Age admixture so those are the ones that are difficult to distinguish from us.
But the clue must be a cultural one? Because people in this area of Spain do not look similar between each other (some are dark, some are blonde - but there is the mix all around the area). What is the difference when you cross the border from Miranda de Ebro to Vitoria? We travelled on this train all the way up, and got off in both cities. And even the urban design is not different. (Miranda is less beautiful, and it doesn't have signs written in euskera - but you really think the people look different than a few kilometres on the same train?)Replies: @Mikel
But still, I can say who is Basque and who is Spanish and be right ~90% of the time.
It is certain that the locals will not be able to determine such differences. Recognition of nationality (for "racially" close nationalities) is mostly done by facial expressions/gestures/clothes/hair.... It's just impossible to tell by the face who it is: Russian or German or Swede or Finn. When I offer to determine the nationality by the photo the result is close to random (despite the fact that the definition is carried out by the very people who claimed that 100% determine the nationality of the form of the human physiognomy)Replies: @AP
If I went to Saint Petersburg I guess I would be unable to say who is a native Ingrian/Karelian and who descends from other parts of Russia but I’m pretty sure locals can detect that difference
It is typical in Russia, and I believe it is typical throughout the ex-Soviet bloc and in China as well.
Can confirm, have one in my yard
it is typical throughout the ex-Soviet bloc