RSS1. I am neither American nor Romanian. I read Chechar, but I don’t comment there. And I agree with you that his obsession with “Hellstorm” and Solzhenitsyn is unhealthy. In the big picture, human suffering is irrelevant so I am anti-humanist. My favorite philosophy is daoism.
2. The war was exterminationist, every German should have killed his wife and his children after April 1945. And this is correct if you look at the Germans of today. Would have been far more honorable than this disguting slavery. But the masses are masses and maybe only 50 years of National Socialism would have changed that. All real fighters that Europe still had, died in 1945. I really wish “they” killed all Germans in 1945, their racial soul was already finished for good.
3. I don’t care about Russian lives, they have fallen prey to Jewry; the Germans could have exterminated them to the last man for all I care.
4. Whatever nonsense you want to believe, in 1941 Hitler was left with only one option: invade the Soviet Union immediately, or face annihilation. Please read Paul Carell’s “Hitler’s War on Russia” ( Hitler Moves East 1941–1943 & Scorched Earth: The Russian-German War, 1943-1944) and the sources below.
5. I am no Christian, but you seem a quasi Jew lover. “Bolschevismus was a force of order” lmao gtfoh Dumb ugly enslaved goyim masses dying for the Jew = Order, I got it.
6. I would never go to war with you.
Sources:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_F%C3%BChrer_to_the_German_People:_22_June_1941
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler_Explains_His_Reasons_for_Invading_the_Soviet_Union
https://archive.org/details/TheFuehrersProclamationToTheGermanPeopleAndTheNoteOfTheGerman
Thanks for the honesty. Still, people such as Rudel or Savitri Devi chose to live, for better or for worse. Expecting the end of the cycle. Hoping that that had not been the last battle. I wonder what their spirits would have said now.
“3. I don’t care about Russian lives, they have fallen prey to Jewry; the Germans could have exterminated them to the last man for all I care.”
I didn’t mean it like that. I actually agree with you here – even more, Russia (and Poland, Ukraine, etc.) is now a corpse after having won the war. What I meant is that Nazis consider the Eastern Front some sort of an ideological war between the Aryan and the Jew, but IMO, it was much less – merely a Russo-German war, a conflict between two deeply flawed European nations. It only became mildly anti-bourgeoisie towards the end.
“5. I am no Christian, but you seem a quasi Jew lover. “Bolschevismus was a force of order” lmao gtfoh Dumb ugly enslaved goyim masses dying for the Jew = Order, I got it.”
Bolschevismus sent a man into space and disallowed its citizens to wear jeans. The USSR had far less migration than in modern times, and the White birthrate was falling a bit slower.
Jews were barely tolerated under the Soviet. The GDR helped Arab shitskins against Israel. The USSR was actively converting Christian churches into museums of natural sciences. It was the war that led to the reintroduction of religion, even the toleration of the dreadful Greek Catholic church in Western Ukraine (to me, anything less than hanging is toleration).
By the way, isn’t it sad that Germans supported the moderate Christian wing of Ukrainian nationalists (the OUN-M) instead of the more radical anti-Christian OUN-B? How can this be defended? I see it all as an opportunity squandered in the optimism, nationalism and close-mindedness of the NSDAP. Because Europeans cannot think religiously anymore?.. The Iranians don’t find it cringe to make a fundamentalist revolution. And in the DPRK, they venerate their Eternal Presidents. Whereas Germans only wished for a third Reich, bigger and better, and with a higher standard of fat living – not for some cosmic last stand against Christianity.
.
The West allowed and nurtured Komeini as the leader of the revolution,
“When Russia was under boot of Zion, they mass-murdered millions of Russians and others – during their commie-reign, and then handed over the wealth of Russia to a handful of Rothschild’s “Russian” oligarchs, when they decided to go Western-style – ((crony “capitalism”)).”
Oh no. In what way was the USSR, a socialist state, under the thumb of capitalist conspirators?
“And that’s why Putin = Hitler, in the West today, because he thwarted the zio-plans for Russia to be looted and its people crushed.”
Yes, Putin is such a Hitler that the Russian nation is rotting from within, losing millions to emigration and drug abuse, and gaining millions of integrated Uzbek and Azeri migrants. Stop it, mate. Putin is Zion. Stalin was a bit like Orbán – limited mind, but stable course.
“Often they are described as geniuses, or madmen. On the other hand, they can be members of groups, but if they are, they will try to reshape the group into conformity with their own thinking rather than conforming to its standards.”
What’s about Alexandra Kollontai, Ayn Rand or Savitri Devi? Weren’t they opposed to their professed creeds enough? The USSR was not totally feminist, the conservative capitalists are not libertarian, and Hitlerians did not fully commit into allying with the swarthy men. In your mind, are they conformist to… what?
P.S. On an unrelated note, the latter two were born and died in the same years. Unfortunately, Savitri has so incredibly fewer conformist to her ideas men…
“It has been conclusively demonstrated that whenever women take over “leadership” positions in churches, those churches will soon be accepting of things like homosexuality and will stop speaking out against abortion.”
A friendly reminder that women never take over, they are given such power. And the said churches never objected to miscegenation for one.
P.S. My response to you from yesterday has been censored, I believe, it is visible on my profile page.
Between fiscal year 1964 and FY 1978, Iran's gross national product grew at an annual rate of 13.2 percent at constant prices. The oil, gas, and construction industries expanded by almost 500 percent during this period, while the share of value-added manufacturing increased by 4 percent. Women's participation in the labor force in urban areas increased. Large numbers of urban Iranian women, from varying social strata, joined the semiskilled and skilled labor forces. In addition, the number of women enrolling in higher education increased from 5,000 in FY 1967 to more than 74,000 in FY 1978. - Wiki
Replies: @Adûnâi
In the early 1970s the Iranian economy saw record years of growth thanks to booming oil prices. By 1976, the Iranian GDP was the largest in the Greater Middle East. The Shah (king) of Iran set about modernising the Iranian military, intent on purchasing billions of dollars worth of the most sophisticated and advanced equipment and weaponry through countries like the United States and the United Kingdom.[29]
Iran's purchases from the United States prior to the Iranian Revolution in 1979 included: 79 F-14 Tomcats, 400 M60 Patton tanks, 225 McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II fighter planes, including 16 RF-4E reconnaissance variants; 166 Northrop F-5 Tiger II fighters and 15 Northrop RF-5A reconnaissance planes; 12 Lockheed P-3 Orion maritime patrol aircraft and two decommissioned and modernised American destroyers, (USS Zellars and USS Stormes). As of 1976 Iran had acquired 500 M109 howitzers from the United States, 52 MIM-23 Hawk anti aircraft batteries with over 2000 missiles, over 2500 AGM-65 Maverick air to ground missiles and over 10,000 BGM-71 TOW missiles. Furthermore, Iran ordered hundreds of helicopters from the United States, notably 202 Bell AH-1J Sea Cobras, 100 Boeing CH-47C Chinooks and 287 Bell 214 helicopters.[30]
Iran's purchases from the United Kingdom prior to the 1979 revolution included 1 decommissioned and modernized British destroyer (HMS Sluys), 4 British-built frigates (Alvand-class frigate) and a vast array of missiles such as the Rapier and Seacat missile systems. Additionally Iran purchased several dozen hovercraft in the SR.N6 variety, 250 FV101 Scorpion light tanks and 790 Chieftain tanks.[31][32]
Iran also notably received much of their ground armored equipment from the Soviet Union. These deals were usually bartered using cheap oil and natural gas from the Iranian side in exchange for Russian expertise, training and equipment. In regards to military equipment Iran ordered ZSU-23-4 artillery vehicles, BTR 300 BTR-60's along with 270 BTR-50s and 300 BM-21 Grad multiple rocket launchers. - Wiki
“If indeed, as I hypothesize, that Iran was brought down purposefully by the deep state of Mossad/CIA operation the only reason for it was because Iran was too good to be true. That Iran was too stronger and that Iran was going to be stronger”
Stronger as in having its women turned into sluts? How could Iran ever have been a threat if it had retained the same degenerate culture as the US?
The DPRK is a threat – because it has a will towards its future, pride in its history and the zeal to die for its ideals.
The USSR is no threat – their men have sold their vast country for a can of Pepsi-Cola, American rock anti-music and stupid American films.
It amazes me how people always ignore the willful castration of the USSR and still think the GDP is a meaningful number.
“While non-European immigration concerns only a minority of the population in Switzerland, several warning signs are showing that integration is proving difficult”
Do you racists still cling to this outrageous word in 2020? Impossible. Do you not understand that integration means race mixing? Miscegenation? The ultimate fulfillment of Jesus’ Commandment of out-group Love?
Switzerland is a rotting corpse as all other previously Aryan nations are, from New Zealand to Belarus. The fact this Alpine country (now mixed with Portuguese Negroes) gave its women the right to vote in an open referendum speaks volumes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women’s_suffrage_in_Switzerland
WW2? Germany? Muh’ evil Judaeo-Bolsheviks? The Holocaust? Germany’s failure? All pales in comparison to the death wish of Judaeo-Christians. The Soviet Union died like a gnat, the US is full of black transvestites… Switzerland is all the same.
“DPRK is a ‘Hermit Kingdom’ looking at its own navel. It is not animated by any ‘eschatology’ and revolutionary fervor to bring the end of times by the ‘Islamic revolution’, as the Mullahs of the ‘Shia arc of resistance’ are not shy to clamor to all and sundry”
Do facts corroborate this statement? Which country is more of a “hermit”?
Iran: Iraq, Syria, Yemen (and support for groups in Bahrain, Qatar, Lebanon, I might add).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Iran
The DPRK: Korea, Congo, Thailand, Vietnam, Israel, Ethiopia, Angola, Somalia, Grenada, Sri Lanka, Panama, Yemen (and links to Myanmar, Western Sahara and Burkina-Faso, I might add).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_North_Korea#North_Korea:_1948–present
Iran seems far more constrained.
“He is at the center of the disturbance, not a mere participant in a disturbance caused by someone else. Their society’s violent reaction against those men is a useful indicator of the extent of their non-conformity.”
Savitri Devi was imprisoned and almost hanged, whereas Nietzsche was never explicitly punished by men.
Do you consider such heroic and immense persons as Himmler or Heydrich merely hypostases of Hitler? And can Hitler be considered a non-conformist if he was immensely successful and venerated in life? Is a true non-conformist always famous, at least, after death? Are the bombers of 9/11 too ordinary, insignificant men for you to consider them equals of Socrates?
I guess, I disagree about the inherent value in non-conformity. To me, there is one objectively correct ideology, and whoever professed it in history no matter the circumstances is to be admired. Sade does not become less degenerate due to his force of will and honesty, just like the soldier who shot the last Jew in Vinnitsa is no less of a giant due to his anonymity.
OT but these Polish Bolshevik Jews also ended up in the Gulags along with every other type of political activist. However, luckily for them, Stalin had second thoughts and fished them out to form the core of his puppet Lublin occupation government. As the newly appointed US Ambassador to Poland, Arthur Bliss Lane, said about them:Well…some people residing in Poland certainly did…
@Alfred
Today’s Poles deny that the Poles welcomed the SOVIET soldiers.
Post WW2 Poland was run by a group of Polish Jewish Bolshevik traitors (eventually removed by ethnic Poles).Replies: @Adûnâi, @Anon
“Unlike some obvious Communists, his appearance (Jakób Berman – Undersecretary of State to the Council of Ministers) gave no indication of brutality or coarseness. I was to learn that he was one of the Kremlin’s principal agents in Poland – one of the men who directed the puppets…. On many occasions, when I could not secure action from other government officials, I went straight to Berman.”“The real directing force within the Army came from General Spychalski, a lithe, quiet-spoken, non-military looking officer whose training had been in Russia. Semitic in origin, he did not have the physical appearance of the average Polish officer. At political meetings of the armed forces it was he and not Zymierski who made the important address.”“Of all the cabinet ministers on whom I was to call, I had been most anxious to meet Mr Stanislaw Radkiewicz, minister of Public Security…. If his customary technique, as we had heard, was to instill terror into the hearts of his callers, to us he showed great cordiality and urbanity. He was a good looking man, apparently of Russian Semitic origin, with carefully combed oily black hair, a keen, mobile, aesthetic face…. The Minister said that at the moment no Americans were under arrest in Poland, and he could assure me that in the event any Americans were arrested, he would see to it that the Embassy would be advised at once. The promise was never carried out….. This was the first and last time that I was able to see Mr Radkiewicz… “
“Post WW2 Poland was run by a group of Polish Jewish Bolshevik traitors (eventually removed by ethnic Poles).”
It is surreal to read such gibberish under this very article… Is Switzerland run by Bolshevik Jews, too? Is the Maori-run New Zealand? Were it the Jews who instigated the Founding Fathers of the US to call all men equal in 1787? Or were it the Jews who made Whites kill each other in Anglo-America in the 1860s to give the Negro the vote?
Were it the Jews who made Negroes citizens of France in 1848?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Communes
Those few Africans from the four communes who were able to pursue higher education and were willing to renounce their legal protections could ‘rise’ to be termed Évolués (‘Evolved’) and were nominally granted full French citizenship. Despite this legal framework, Évolués still faced substantial discrimination in Africa and the Metropole alike.
Jews again? They were only starting to get equal rights around Europe themselves, but were already manipulating poor innocent Whites into caring about the Negro? Seems more like a natural evolution of the Christian death wish.
Napoleon emancipated the Jews, giving them the same rights as non-Jewish citizens. However, to conclude from that fact that Jews had been oppressed by non-Jews in Europe is only possible if one is ignorant of history.
Jews again? They were only starting to get equal rights in Europe themselves, but were already manipulating poor innocent Whites into caring about the Negro?
and accused the West and everybody and his uncle for dealings with Hitler, which is what you little sovok are doing here. You getting your talking points straight form your hero Stalin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiers_of_History
Falsifiers pointedly ignored Soviet relations with Germany, making no attempt to directly counter or deal with the documents published in Nazi–Soviet Relations.[14] Rather, the main theme of the booklet is Western culpability for the outbreak of war in 1939.[3] It argues that "Western powers" aided Nazi rearmament and aggression, including that American bankers and industrialists provided capital for the growth of German war industries, while deliberately encouraging Hitler to expand eastward.[1][3] It depicted the Soviet Union as striving to negotiate a collective security against Hitler, while being thwarted by double-dealing Anglo–French appeasers who, despite appearances, had no intention of a Soviet alliance and were secretly negotiating with Berlin
Your sovok MO when further denials can't be sustained is to explain that the Pact was a necessity, pragmatism and blah blah blah and besides everybody else was having the fling with the dashing Adolf Hitler so why not Stalin. They look so well together:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact
For decades, it was the official policy of the Soviet Union to deny the existence of the secret protocol to the Soviet–German Pact. At the behest of Mikhail Gorbachev, Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev headed a commission investigating the existence of such a protocol. In December 1989, the commission concluded that the protocol had existed and revealed its findings to the Congress of People's Deputies of the Soviet Union.[241] As a result, the Congress passed the declaration confirming the existence of the secret protocols, condemning and denouncing them.[253][254] Both successor-states of the pact parties have declared the secret protocols to be invalid from the moment they were signed. The Federal Republic of Germany declared this on 1 September 1989, and the Soviet Union did the same on 24 December 1989,[255] following an examination of the microfilmed copy of the German originals.[256]
The Soviet copy of the original document was declassified in 1992 and published in a scientific journal in early 1993.
Bravo, no more Katyn denials.
“Joseph Stalin was right to order the murder in Katyn" - January 20, 2020, Yevgeny Satanovsky
“Joseph Stalin was right to order the murder in Katyn” – January 20, 2020, Yevgeny Satanovsky”
Satanovsky is a Jew. He has no right to talk for the USSR or Russia.
By the way, do you have an explanation for how the Katyn massacre was made using German ammunition? It’s not even addressed on the Wikipedia article. Because defending the USSR is physically impossible for a non-Russian. A mental barrier greater than that against Hitler.
Many in the west thought the German demands on Poland were justified, the return of Danzig and a referendum or whatever in the corridor, mainly to restore to Germany what had been lost at Versailles.y
. The decision to go to war was made after Hitler realized that Poland won’t be the 2nd Czechoslovakia because of British guarantees.
The mystery is not why the Nazis attacked Poland, but why Chamberlain made the guarantee .. for insight read Wynham Lewis's 'Left Wings Over Europe, or How to Make a War About Nothing', written in 1936Replies: @Adûnâi
"Englishmen who possessed strategic vision were, with few exceptions, appalled", writes William Manchester.
"This is the maddest single action this country has ever taken" M.P. Robert Boothsby told Churchill.
"We are taking a frightful gamble" said Lloyd George. Told by Chamberlain that the pact with Poland will deter Hitler. the prime minister "burst out laughing". If the British army general staff approved this, said Lloyd George, they "ought to be confined to a lunatic asylum".
“The mystery is not why the Nazis attacked Poland, but why Chamberlain made the guarantee”
Why? Because Hitler was not a conscious actor, but an idiot led by vengeance instead? Describes the situation perfectly!
It was Germany that started the war. And Germany that could have kept peace. What mental gymnastics must one employ to deny it…
“Stalin was given the plans by the germans no less who found out a plan by the british and french to attack the USSR and if Germany had not attacked then the UK/French would have.”
Source on this? And how is it relevant? If true, it makes Hitler a confirmed idiot – why give the English Jews a pretext for war, when they could have united to attack Russia instead?
“Far fetched?? Like how the US was going to use over 250 nukes and destroy over 60 major cities in the USSR?”
Oh no, this sounds so retarded… Don’t you tell me Russians did not have similar plans. Because everybody did. That’s what nukes are for – to explode over the assets of your enemy! Of course, cities would have been bombed.
“the Jews have momentarily blinded the world to the five-thousand year historic reality of unrelenting Jewish predation of non-Jews”
Why are you spewing such factually incorrect nonsense? Are you trying to mar anti-semitism with your lunacies? Check out Wikipedia – the Jewish people are not older than 3000 years. Not your “5 millennia”.
And the second point – what is this “predation” supposed to mean? Are you so ignorant of history that in your mind, only Jews preyed upon foreigners? Do a reality check! Anglo-Saxons raped Brits, Danes then raped the Anglos, Normans invaded France, then England, then France again… The history is full of hatred, and that’s OK.
“Oh the poor long-suffering Jews, boo hoo.”
And this… this is pure Christian axiology. The weak are good! Strength is evil!
A general difference between ancient Greco-Roman virtue and modern virtue can be glimpsed through the ancient sculpture, the Dying Gaul. The sculpture portrays a wounded “barbarian”. Whereas moderns would tend to imitate Christ in feeling compassion for the defeated man, its original pagan cultural context suggests a different interpretation: the cruel defeat and conquest of the barbarian as the true, the good, and the beautiful.
https://chechar.wordpress.com/2018/06/13/heismans-suicide-note-3/
Ukraine today is under absolute Jewish supremacist domination.
Katyn. ... an exemplar of the Jewish Bolshevik revolutionary methodology of exterminating as much of the ruling/aristocratic class as possible as the means to establishing full control.
“if J-supremacist Bolsheviks had not starved to death untold millions of the hardiest, most resilient, intelligent and independent of Ukraine’s people, as soon as these fiends had Ukraine by the throat”
A friendly reminder to any ignoramuses that the population of the Ukraine reached its absolute peak of 53 mil. people under the Soviet power (in 1993). Whereas under capitalism, it has faced more death and general decline than in the famines and WW2.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Ukraine
Ukraine has been losing 200k-400k people a year for the past two decades. That is a White genocide far worse than muh’ Judaeo-Bolsheviks.
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/ukraine-population/
“Dresden was full to the brim with Eastern European women and children fleeing for their lives from the genocidal Bolshevik fiend, who was unleashing its Red Army rapist orcs on Eastern Europe and Germany, now that the men were all slaughtered or dying a slow death in their gulags”
How can you say that with a straight face? Last time I checked, Germans were living in the German Democratic Republic just fine. They were not genocided. Unlike Belarus which lost 10% of its population in WW2.
The population of Belarus suffered a dramatic decline during World War II, dropping from more than 9 million in 1940 to 7.7 million in 1951.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Belarus
Whereas the sodomite capitalism of the West brought nothing but ruin and misery after the Easterners had sold out their Socialist countries for a can of Pepsi-Cola.
About 1.7 million people have left the new federal states (the East) since the fall of the Berlin Wall, or 12% of the population;[26] a disproportionately high number of them were women under 35.[27]
After 1990, the total fertility rate (TFR) in the East dropped to 0.772 in 1994. This has been attributed to a “demographic shock”: people not only had fewer children, they were also less likely to marry or divorce after the end of the GDR; the biographic options of the citizens of the former GDR had increased. Young motherhood seemed to be less attractive and the age of the first birth rose sharply.[24]
“I recognize from your “Adûnâi”, that you are a Jew.”
FFS, can you stop misreading my nickname? It’s U, not O, in the middle. From Tolkien’s legendarium. An allusion to Mitteleuropa, or between America and Russia.
http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Adûnaic
“Anti-Semitism and anti-Nazism are essentially the same, opposition to the criminality of exceptionalist cults.”
So, are you the same as the quacks on aryanism.net? Are you hating Jews because they want to kill all non-Jews? Are you the same as Christians who want to impose their rot on everybody, so that we all become equal in death?
This Amalek type of warfare has been practiced on a large scale since Jewish Advisors took over the west and the east with communism since 12.23. 1913. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/9/196/htm
And Joshua overwhelmed the people of Amalek with the sword.וַיֹּ֨אמֶר יְהוָ֜ה אֶל־מֹשֶׁ֗ה כְּתֹ֨ב זֹ֤את זִכָּרוֹן֙ בַּסֵּ֔פֶר וְשִׂ֖ים בְּאָזְנֵ֣י יְהוֹשֻׁ֑עַ כִּֽי־מָחֹ֤ה אֶמְחֶה֙ אֶת־זֵ֣כֶר עֲמָלֵ֔ק מִתַּ֖חַת הַשָּׁמָֽיִם׃Then the LORD said to Moses, “Inscribe this in a document as a reminder, and read it aloud to Joshua: I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven!”וַיִּ֥בֶן מֹשֶׁ֖ה מִזְבֵּ֑חַ וַיִּקְרָ֥א שְׁמ֖וֹ יְהוָ֥ה ׀ נִסִּֽי׃And Moses built an altar and named it Adonai-nissi.וַיֹּ֗אמֶר כִּֽי־יָד֙ עַל־כֵּ֣ס יָ֔הּ מִלְחָמָ֥ה לַיהוָ֖ה בַּֽעֲמָלֵ֑ק מִדֹּ֖ר דֹּֽר׃ (פ)He said, “It means, ‘Hand upon the throne of the LORD!’ The LORD will be at war with Amalek throughout the ages.”
Twice in the Hebrew Bible—Exodus 17:14–16 and Deuteronomy 25: 17–19—the ancient Israelites were commanded to “blot out” the memory of Amalek, their enemy for all time (as God intended to do as well). Yet, because these texts are a part of Jewish (and Christian) religious traditions, annually these passages are read in the synagogue on the appropriate Sabbath occasions in the annual reading cycle, and linked to the Festival of Purim that is based on the Book of Esther. Over the course of Jewish history, Amalek has served as the symbolic enemy of the Jewish people (e.g., Armenians, Nazis, Palestinians); indeed, all of the enemies of the Jews were and are understood to be descendants of the original Amalekites, and thus worthy not only of enmity but of destruction as well (e.g., Haman, Antiochus, Titus, Hadrian, Torquemada, Khmelnitsky, Hitler).
“No country in Europe is as prone to self-destruction as the Poles. Their hatred of all things Russian has condemned them”
Russia is a melting pot of Tartars and Caucasian Negroes. Russia is murdering the Russian people first and foremost. Hating Russia is a decent idea.
…too bad when Slavs hate Russia, it’s all for the wrong reasons. I can’t speak for the Poles’ rationales, but Ukrainians despise everything good in Russia such as the remains of their racist thinking.
Still, even the vestiges of Russian self-consciousness look more like Black Israelism or Christian Identity. On YouTube, those anti-semitic and anti-capitalist videos get hundreds of thousands of views that also parrot inane nonsense about “Great Tartary” founded by Aryan extraterrestrials.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ovm0-Ta5NIo
Probably the same as the Polish denial of the fact that their lands had been inhabited by Burgundians and Vandals before the Slavs came. Or the Belarussian claim that they were dominant in the GD of Lithuania.
What even is worse – this “pro-White” insanity or the clear honest death wish among Western liberals?
Bullshit! Read the relevant article of the Soviet Criminal Code, nowhere is antisemitism or Jewish ever mentioned.
... to the point of imposing the death penalty upon “antisemitism” as a counter-revolutionary act in the USSR...
True. I expected to provide the destruction of the USSR via subversive “pro-freedom” activities as an example of Jews’ ruining an anti-Jewish country by making it more “free”… But of course not.
The USSR will forever be remembered (if not ignored) by Neo-Nazis as a bastion of evil “Judaeo-Bolsheviks”, facts be damned. There is a limited amount of points one can assign to breaking psychic taboos – enough to start loving Hitler (even in places where one shouldn’t), not enough to start respecting Stalin.
Keep in mind this was written well before the great purge, and Stalin's concept of "socialism in one state" had not yet been ensconced as official Soviet policy.
Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.
…the people composing the brain trusts and money-power leading the war on our civil liberties is the same as the one which oppressed people in the Soviet Union and oppresses Palestinians today.
This never ends… What has the Soviet Union got to do with your free speech? Why do you need Pavlovian-dog-like to insert a slanderous cliche unrelated to the subject matter by implying/stating that a tiny minority of Jews oppressed the Soviet people?
You might say that about the US now (after all they rule almost everything that matters) but not the USSR, not even in the early stages of Bolshevik rule when many Jews flocked to the anti-Tsar parties. The most vicious of the anti-Bolshevik groups were the Right Socialist Revolutionaries run by Jews. The Bolsheviks were the leading force of the Revolution and the victors of the civil war and foreign invasions (UK, France, Japan, US, Poland, Finland and others, plus 50,000 Chech troops stranded in Russia at the end of WWI) because the people were on their side. You cannot win a civil war without people’s support; after all, a civil war is a people’s war.
The slander is even more grotesque when recent history revealed that the “oppressed” people of the Soviet Union actually voted to be oppressed !!! (and for the uninitiated here, they even recently voted Stalin the 3rd most celebrated Russian of all time, ahead of all the Great Tsars and Tsarina). At the 1991 referendum for the preservation of the Soviet Union, 80% of the voters voted my a majority of over 76% in favour.
When writing banalities as this any serious reader dismisses what you say as baseless gibberish. What’s the point?
What's the point? Jews are monolithic evil, across centuries, across continents.
What’s the point?
The Bolsheviks won to two major factors: they used the red terror and systematic indoctrination, like Mao, to greater effect, the white army came way too late to the game. And as after WW 1 the motivation on the Russian side to fight for the old, defeated regime was low. Also: the October Revolution and the wars in Russia were hardly a pure civil war, but much like the 30 years war a combination of invasion, social revolution, unrest and clandestine revenge. This is pretty much mainstream history even.
You cannot win a civil war without people’s support; after all, a civil war is a people’s war.
“Also Hitler never went whole hog. Women were only very partially mobilized and much cultural and social activity continued in the Reich all through the war(read Goebbels diaries).”
True. Adolf Hitler was a ridiculous coward. Never burned a single church in Germany. All you need to know.
“If Mussolini hadn’t invaded Greece and had to be bailed out by Hitler, Hitler would have invaded Russian on May 15th. It is quite possible the Wehrmacht might have gotten behind the Urals before winter and captured the Soviet arms factories.”
No, that is incorrect. And what’s up with the winter talk? Germans were stopped by the Russian Army and by the sheer distance from their bases in Poland, not by muh’ cold weather. And the Barbarossa had failed by September.
“He should have taken Vichy which would have forced Franco to allow the Germans to pass through and take Gibraltar.”
Vichy was an independent country that also had power over all of France’s colonies except for Cameroon and later Gabon. Germany could not have supplied a force in Africa larger than in history. Turkey could not have attacked the USSR through the Caucasus.
“Also under such conditions, the lend-lease arrangements would be likely to be more generous.
Hitlers military power had been built up by the Us/Uk and it was their proxyweapon and not an outcome from any german economic miracle like the naive are raving about.”
I don’t know if you are still active, but could you please present to me your explanation as to why the Anglos were supporting the USSR after 1941 and fighting Germany? To me, it seems obvious that the outcome of WW2 with the total Soviet victory in Eurasia was the worst case scenario to the geopolitical interests of the USA.
I greatly respect Stalinists such as yourself, but I believe this to be your blind spot. A Eurasia united under Moscow was a greater menace to the West than a Eurasia torn among Berlin, Rome, Tokyo, and even possibly London and Novosibirsk.
The only rationale for the Anglos to have fought Germany could be their hatred of the Aryan race’s rise in Middle Europe. And if their propaganda machine is as strong as many believe… why not at least switch lend-lease to Germany in 1944? And start bombing Russia?
Of course, you might say that the West easily defeated the victorious USSR after 38 short years (after Stalin’s death). To that I will say – we are all infected with the plague of Christian axiology, and the USA is already in its death throes. Geopolitics ultimately mean very little if every country is killing itself (except for Hitler’s Germany and the DPRK). That is what Stalin was too limited to see.
“The Us/Uk who bragg about having fought Hitler have had no qualms about supporting nazis in Ukraine.”
Last time I checked, there was no power in Ukraine that tried to ban women from universities and put Jews into gas chambers. Unfortunately.
I gave you a Troll not for your first sentence but for your second one. Do you really believe thousands of wholly innocent Wuhanese who potentially might be infected and die, deserve their fate due to some Cosmic collective punishment ?Replies: @Blinky Bill, @Adûnâi
Perhaps Wuhan deserves its plague but civilized peoples do not.
Quite anecdotal, but I watched a few funny animal compilations on YouTube a week ago, and a lot of pets were from China. Is it correct to say the Chinese are more cruel than Westerners? Maybe it’s only the older generation? After all, I also saw a lesbian having an AMA on Reddit, she lived in inner China.
If anyone deserves extermination, it’s Taiwan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Asia
https://kotaku.com/cosplaying-politician-elected-in-taiwan-1840984735/
(On the one hand, César Tort hates animal killers. But on the other, I hate sodomites. The world is so complicated…)
“At that time, around a third of the world population became infected at some point. That means about 2 billion people today, which can translate into as many as 60 million deaths”
I hate such useless estimates. Because they include the populations of Africa, India and Latin America – regions which humans have not colonized yet anyway.
A deleted comment in that Reddit thread provided an insight into the mind of the Chinese and Westerners.
There’s none of this politically correct crap in china. They will put an ad in the paper requesting hot girls to apply for stewardess positions and the entire train is serviced by smoking hot girls. It’s wonderful. If they get ugly or fat they get fired.
Again, pure capitalism and Christianity. The Chinese see no problem with whoredom, and neither do Western libertarians. May Coronachan come and take away the sodomites.
I am not Jewish. I am a Russian/Ruthenian.
“Are you defending their criminal history out of tribal loyalty or just sheer stupidity?”
If anyone has a criminal history, that’s the White race. By praying to the foreign god of the Jews, by giving women the rights to owning property and by spreading sodomite degeneracy around the world. By wanting to die. That is a thing viler than burning children alive.
Jews are a fine nation, no better and no worse than any other. Especially now that they have their separate country in their ancestral lands. But you consider any display of strength as evil. You are infected. And many Jews are, too. There are sodomite parades in Jerusalem. It is the Whites who abuse those poor Jews, not the other way round.
“And in pursuit of it, the Poles immediately invaded Ukraine, going all the way to Kiev, to compel membership in this “alliance.” This little-known Polish-Ukrainian War starting in 1919 led to the much better known Russo-Polish War of 1920”
How can you be so horribly wrong? The Poles were allied with the Ukrainians when their joint attack recaptured Kiev from the Soviets! The war between them had already finished, and it had been waged for Lviv and Galicia! This attack in Ukraine was the result of their peace negotiations, where Petliura had betrayed the Galicians and given them to the Poles.
You're exactly the kind of chump they love, too. If I could beam my thoughts into the minds of all disaffected white western men, I would say just one thing: Come to Russia if you want a wife.Western women are for the most part a lost cause. Not all bad, but definitely not wife material. And they created inceldom, you know.Replies: @Adûnâi
Men in our spaces HAVE to get women on our side, for survival. We need to reproduce, and you ain’t gonna do it without getting some women who think like us. Trust me. Do you really want to be an incel?
“If I could beam my thoughts into the minds of all disaffected white western men, I would say just one thing: Come to Russia if you want a wife.”
1. Russian legislation is the same as in America. The same divorce-rapes, the same property rights.
2. Russian women all go to the university.
3. Russian society is as focused on whoring and cock-carousel-hopping.
4. Considering American women a lost cause is defeatist. When the USD crashes and law breaks down, they can be captured and turned good.
Yea good luck with that. No one ever came to grief white knighting for American women!
Considering American women a lost cause is defeatist. When the USD crashes and law breaks down, they can be captured and turned good.
“I am currently in east Europe. The place is full of lovely intelligent white ladies who seem keen to partner with a man almost old enough to be their grandfather.”
I don’t understand why the existence of expensive whores makes you optimistic. And I don’t get what in the feminist legislation of every Slavic country gives you hope. Russian women are every bit as slutty – they attain education, they work, they own property – and they divorce en masse.
I guess this deranged lunatic must be another one of those Unz misogynists totally not threatening to take women's rights away.
And I don’t get what in the feminist legislation of every Slavic country gives you hope. Russian women are every bit as slutty – they attain education, they work, they own property – and they divorce en masse.
“Americans are schooled almost exclusively in “Western” culture: geography, philosophy, history — poorly schooled, to be sure.”
What Americans utterly fail to grasp is the notion of a country. To them, America is not one, but a world unto itself instead. Borders are a poorly understood gimmick. And the idea of international wars? That makes no sense to them. From their sheltered position inbetween the oceans, the only matters close to their heart are “muh’ evil government” and “muh’ civil liberties”. That’s why even the brightest Americans badmouth Stalin – in their mind, international wars do not exist. Germany? Armies? Russia? It’s Hitler good or Hitler bad, not complex geopolitics and fight for survival.
“Your English is flawless. So are you a native and resident Ruthenian, in which case your command of English is truly impressive”
I took English classes from a race-mixing (with a Mongolian) post-Soviet Jew starting at 12. And curiously, I was never entangled in the Russian Internet.
“Strength in defense is honorable and noble. Strength employed in pursuit of adventurous aggression/conquest is evil.”
Evil is failure. It is a misconception, however, that a Darwinian naturalist perspective means an immediate war of all against all – it looks more like game theory. That’s why such sensible half-Christian ideas as that of a just war made some sense. But make no mistake – those who do not expand when they can take a risk and will be punished.
I consider modern West to be fully Christian – any expansion, any aggression is inherently evil in their eyes. This is why I am not blinded by their seeming splendour and might – their foundations are rotten, and their fate will be sealed in time.
“militarism-for-profit, death-merchants”
See, profit (and matter!) comes in different kinds. To an objective reality, true good is the furtherance of the interests of a race. The strengthening of an economic clique is not that. Economic profits will be for naught if they are not based on physical genocide. Take Rome – it grew steadily when it was colonizing Italy, but with the advent of the Marian reforms which turned a soldier from a peasant into a mercenary, the polity became rootless, superficial, idealist and thus doomed.
In short – America itself was half-decent when they were genociding the Amerindians, but when they turned to money-hoarding and market-exporting (replaced an ethnic empire with an economic one), then their descendants were robbed of the future.
“Essentially it is a statement originating from the primal pre-civilized element in all of us, by those still comfortable with the concept of rape and pillage — as long as it is them doing the raping and pillaging”
their*
Rome was founded on the Rape of Sabine Women. Ancient Germanics were constantly raiding the Empire for spoils – and payed the price when their calculation proved wrong. But not raiding comes at an opportunity cost.
https://chechar.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/lycanthropy/
But to you Christians, reality matters little. What is the difference between this concept of good for its own sake and plain suicide? Disregarding reality is easy when it is your supernatural JEW who created it and your supernatural JEW who will destroy it at the end times.
Rome was founded on sacrifice – for one’s tribe. As Mitchell Heisman put it, Christianity took sacrifice ad absurdum and posited it as an absolute virtue. Now pain itself is good and commendable, not what one is suffering for. Idealism and the hatred of Matter!
“Meanwhile 50% of agricultural land in Russia is being destroyed by permafrost melt.”
Isn’t it the opposite? Doesn’t permafrost’s melting bring Russia more usable land for the future? And isn’t global warming a net positive for Russia anyway?
“Moscow itself has seen no winter this year.”
Isn’t this to be celebrated? Warmer climate is better.
This and the previous article by the Russian Christian Orthodox Jew writing under the nickname Israel Shamir is another example that Jews may disagree and fight for different and even apparently opposite political causes, but when it comes to the global politics of extorting money from the whole nations, they cooperate brilliantly. The two articles by Israel Shamir are the example of the incredible huzpah in changing and manipulating the facts of the history of the II World War and of the history of the extermination of the European Jewry by the Nazi Germany.
The Roman Law valid in all the Western world’s law systems says that the citizen’s property left after his death without heirs passes to the state. Polish Jews who died exterminated by Nazi Germans were Polish citizens and so their property, sometimes preserved, but often partially or wholly destroyed, passed to the Polish state if there were no inheritors left demanding their right to the property. The same that would be the case in the U.S.A, Canada, Britain, France or Holland.
Now, the international Jewry needs always more money to impose its power on nations, so from the original shameless demand of $60 bln to be payed by Poland it passed to the $300 bln.
Now consider 3 basic facts:
“But the officers either genuinely knew nothing about the crimes of 1919-21 or stuck together, bringing down the collective punishment of the Katyn executions. It was not just, but it followed a certain logic of relations between the Polish and Soviet governments.”
Huh? What’s about the fact that the Poles were shot dead with German munitions? Why is everybody overlooking this gigantic fact? You Westerners are living in an alternate reality where sodomite sex is legal and where Katyn was perpetrated by the Soviets, and not the SS! So shameless. So surreal. It’s like they are ignoring straight facts staring in their faces. The same way as Wikipedia is talking about the non-existence of human races or the existence of so-called “genders”.
This world is insane. Only the DPRK remains.
“Yes, no court will participate in significantly damaging the conventional ‘Holocaust’ narrative — Irving v Lipstadt is another example.”
Wasn’t Irving utterly destroyed in that court case? Wasn’t he so destroyed, no racist should ever mention that happening as it is too humiliating, and their lies are all too visible?
Oh wait, we are dealing with delusional pseudohistory here where nobody reads the other side (such as Lying About Hitler by Richard J. Evans).
Denying the Holocaust is rejecting the Academia. Disregarding the Academia is the same as talking about extraterrestrial Hyperborean ancestors of modern Aryans – quackery.
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!”
– Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Program
Could you explain why you consider this scary? Would you rather folks get more than they need, and less than they deserve?
Like human equality, it’s just another lie you tell yourselves to hold society together.
Do you consider society purely a machine disconnected from biology? That’s a myopic view. Sure, you are surrounded by such constructs now, but that has not been the sole case throughout history, and even in the current world is not absolute.
Think about it – nothing outside America exists to you, nothing outside modernity! Romans that burned Carthage and crucified their enemies; Germans who fought the said Romans and then the French; Nazis who gassed the Jews and burned their bodies – that matters naught to you! Because all you can see is the triumph of the technological civilization now, and therefore everything contrary to that is a fluke in your mind!
Possessed by Unabomberism, you are no different from a normie to whom anything else than the current is inconceivable. No different from a Boasian/feminist who sees social constructs everywhere and wants to break [free from] them. Is a gun that kills people with a press of a button so bad that you would rather die than try it out? Ought the violins be banned for only the vocal cords must be given a permit to vibrate? Is a socialist collective that bad if it is united in its hatred to Jewish individualism?
“142,000 Americans died due to pharmaceutical drug use in 2016, but that’s not news, either
But 100 Chinese–mostly born during WWII, malnourished and carrying a heavy disease burden–have died from a novel virus and that’s an epidemic?”
Two simple words (that nobody has uttered yet): herd immunity.
What a joke of an article. Do you believe China would have gone into a full panic mode without sufficient reasons? This article is almost as bad as outright lies (ignoring reality is quite similar to lying) – yesterday I saw a Russian conspiracy video by Vavilov on DenTV claiming the Chinese officials to have quarantined Wuhan on January 6th without an order from the CCP… Yeah, pure lies, 400k views. But this is just as bad.
“The remainder of your remarks I appreciate. However, when confronted with information like the following below, “I’m different” is completely insufficient to describe my response and, I hope, any civilized person’s response. People who do that (openly, I must point out; it looks like a street scene) are obviously humans, but what kind of humans? What kind of culture condones that?”
Do you consider Romans less cultured than modern sodomists? FLY, Romans used to crucify folks along the roads, and their roads were decently long.
What’s wrong with burning dogs alive anyway? They bark in a funny way when boiled, LoL.
I am no Christian, but I subscribe to the humane (from HOMINES:SAPIENTES, not modern faggoty “humanism”) supremacist view that Man is the master of the Earth (although Nature is ultimately higher, and Man is subservient to her, Nature is not animals – that is the crucial mistake NS made).
“In fact, the idea that man and his societies stand apart from nature is what I’m arguing against; and we should note that in the West, imagining there’s such a sharp division is a residue of Christian thinking.”
There is a division, and it is made mainly by Christianity, but also by individualist greed and lust. You seem to misunderstand me – what I am saying is that modern civilization is not an organic machine, and such inorganic monstrosities are not the only path forward. Republican Rome existed and triumphed over Carthage – that it was corrupted by wealth had not been predestined. Nazi Germany rose in the last century – how is that explained with your quasi-Marxist technological reductionist theory? There clearly are two forces fighting – if you can only see technology now, it does not bar Thor from rising again tomorrow and crushing the cathedrals.
“each species, each race, and each individual can be understood as a set of techniques encoded in DNA, so in this way all living things can be considered as a type of technological system”
When men make another system (such as throwing rocks at skulls, or printing money), and that system malfunctions consuming them, they might try and set it straight. History shows it can be done. Memes can be made subservient to genes.
“Can you be conscious without a brain? I don’t think so. The delusion that human beings aren’t really their bodies, but instead are “souls” distinct from their bodies, is another delusion encouraged (though, to be fair, not invented) by Christianity.”
Are you now a biological reductionist, too? There is no software without the hardware, yet are those tautological? Is a parliament a building with chairs and people, or is it a concept dealing with other similar concepts on a different level of reality? Taking psychotropic drugs may lobotomize you the same way as scratching an optical disk damages it – but in what way does that treat the psychical disorder or an incorrectly-written program?
Also, equating psyche to immortal souls is disingenuous.
“Hitler – betrayed by his fellow Germans, n.b. including “treue” Heinrich.”
This is a weird case because the entire idea of fighting till the end is controversial. Hitler did not have a monopoly on National Socialism or the fate of Europe. Everybody is welcome to try their own way.
“Manson – betrayed by “family” member Linda Kasabian.”
Hitler was not betrayed by women, at least. Could you explain your adoration for Manson for the sake of our mutual friend Chechar? Because to me, Manson is like Billie Eilish – a random American pop icon, quite a far cry from any collectivist terrorists the likes of Osama bin Laden or Kim Jong Il whom I consider true overmen.
Ankara is in effect annexing those areas pending an appeal to international tribunals, which can take many years to resolve.
Wow. The Turks really have their work cut out for them here. Do they at least have Qatar on their side? And what about Russia? I heard a rumor that Moscow was also highly displeased with Erdogan's new power-grab in Mediterranean. If so, Turkey's f*cked.
On the one side is the Turkey-Libya Axis, while on the other is Greece, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Israel, France, Germany, UK and probably the United States ...
I heard a funny story that the CIA made Haftar change his name, because it was originally Hifter. Bad branding, ya know! But I can almost believe it. After all, they made the Svoboda Party of Ukraine change their name from--get this!--the Social-Nationalist Party ... too Nazi.Replies: @Patriot Crack, @Adûnâi
Turkey’s ambitious gambit makes it more likely that its rivals will increase their support for the Libyan warlord, Haftar, who is, by-most-accounts, a CIA asset that was sent to Libya in 2014 to topple the government in Tripoli and unify the country under a US puppet.
“I heard a funny story that the CIA made Haftar change his name”
This article literally claims that Haftar is supported by the CIA, the RF and the UAE.
“After all, they made the Svoboda Party of Ukraine change their name from–get this!–the Social-Nationalist Party … too Nazi.”
Svoboda was so Nazi, it never wanted to exterminate the Jews, oligarchs or put women back into the kitchen. Stop with this nonsense that there are Neo-Nazis in Ukraine. Kim Jong Il knows, I would join them. Alas, there are none.
But it is true that Ukraine is a funny place. Social Nationalists, you say? Here male students can talk about “Cultural Marxism” in a public speech, and nobody (bar me) bats an eye! A physics teacher believes in magic and dowsing. The world outside the DPR of Korea is a mad place.
@Mike Whitney “Cubic feet”? Foot fetishism is out of bounds.
Neither did the "real" Nazis. The closest they came to putting women back in the kitchen was paying them for procreating.
it never wanted to exterminate the Jews, oligarchs or put women back into the kitchen.
“The last time Turkey was involved in Libya, it was a happy and prosperous country, not a slave market.”
That “last time” was when Kadafi was alive, before Erdogan’s sadistic Misrata gangs tortured him to death. https://www.voltairenet.org/article171731.html
See also: “… in 2011 Turkey placed at NATO’s disposal [for training and arming] the militia from Misrata, a city dominated by the families of former Ottoman soldiers, often Circassians or Jews converted to Islam, who settled in Libya in the 19th century.” https://www.voltairenet.org/article208652.html
Turkey has been on board for destroying Libya from the outset. And now, Erdogan plans to take matters into his sole hands..
“You either conquer or get conquered; exploit or be exploited. In this regard, human societies are not much different than ants or bees.”
No, if this were natural, Americans would not take pride in a country that abolishes their rights of ownership over their own women, a civilization that serves the interests of Jesus and other non-Whites.
If you want a parallel with the natural world, it is closer to an ant colony whose queen has been killed and the power over which has been usurped by a spider. Then yes, patriotism is a natural signal, yet directed to the “anti-natural” (anti-host) ends.
The blind spot of my analogy is that Jesus never existed, unlike spiders, and that ants do not value personal comfort or the pursuit of happiness. (Nazi nonocausalists will say the spider is the Jew, but last time I checked, Israel had no future.) What remains is a psychic scourge of a suicidal civilizational meme.
Agree that this “Lance Welton” fellow is an execrable worm. Always was and always will.
Articles like this one are nothing but a high pitch of irresponsible nonsense, and this “Lance Welton” fellow is an execrable worm. Surfing the wave of panic propagating from the corona virus—which is a serious matter, but is also 95% hype and not particularly dangerous—and using it as a cudgel wherewith to flog a dubious race-realist hobbyhorse, is both preposterous and disgusting.
“that may bring China down. They need our sympathy and compassion. Unfortunately too many deplorables here all they can express is an ugly Schadenfreude. Very sad. Disgusting.”
Why would non-Chinese be sad if China is destroyed? Do you understand the concept of separate identities? Or are you on drugs mumbling about how “we are one with the world”?
“Is it not now reasonable to suppose that this virus was deliberately made to harm Chinese people?”
This is a fascinating idea. Because if the CIA have indeed been behind this, they must understand that bringing China down will also mean the collapse of the capitalists system worldwide! And that means that César Tort is wrong – the Federal Reserve Jews are not as stupid, just the opposite – there is a mysterious elite hiding in the shadows and pulling the strings in the background according to some conspired plan.
Of course, this does not make the message on the Georgia Guidestones real – if they want to cull the population, why vaccinate all the Negroes? Why exterminate smallpox and poliomyelitis?
“Why do you bother writing such obvious lies about Ukraine being a normal country?”
To me, all countries that are not at war with America are “normal”. All ideologies aside from NatSoc, Juche or fundamentalist Islam (Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Iran’s Shia Republic) are profane. Capitalists, Marxists, Christians, lukewarm Muslims – all are the same degenerate LGBT supporters.
I do not care about freedom, but the biological survival of my people. All want to die aside from the likes of the DPR of Korea.
“But not a single bookshop stocks any books by Marx or any Communist literature. I guess that is called “freedom”.”
Why buy physical books if you can steal/pirate them online?
“In the same way, white Americans are sacrificing their personal interests, and their specific racial interests, in favor of the interests of their greater unity as a nation.”
No, the [civilized humanistic] nation is the very anti-thesis of an ant colony. That nation is an inorganic memetic machine. Throughout history, even under traditional Christianity more or less, it was used as a tool of the genes. Now, it is against race and biology.
Your analogy would have been closer to the truth if you had seen civilization as a unity of “humankind” (because it is at least vaguely rooted in reality), but “mankind’ is too a memetic concept, and selling your daughters to Negroes is only comprehensible through the prism of Jesus-worship.
The DPRK is a superorganism because it unites 25 mil. closely related people, where a mere tribe united 150. This is progress. Not a crazed sick race welded together with the rubbish through the power of love – such a civilization is destined to lose its technology to begin with, and thus degrade into primordial inorganic chaos.
“What this comes down to is that you are still, under certain circumstances, willing to place humans outside of nature.”
By definition, there are three groups: 1) non-human animals; 2) hominins; 3) hominins of my race. The non-humans I shall preserve for future generations, my comrades should expect my support, and the foreigners that also compete with my race for resources should await my hate.
Yes, I put my race over the rest of animals. No, not over Nature overall. No, it does not make me an anti-racist.
“Thus, you have no problem with characterizing North Koreans as a superorganism, but because in your opinion the people are not closely related enough, refuse to do so in the case of the USA.”
This is literal anti-racism.
“Further, regarding memes and “memetic concepts”, don’t Koreans use them? And if they do use them, then why isn’t their nation “an inorganic memetic machine” too?”
Oh, they do. And it is a machine. I would not call fire organic, or its use not artificial. But in their case, they are driving such a machine, not are slaves to it.
“What’s “traditional” Christianity? And when exactly does some human behavior start or stop being natural?”
Back when women were barred from inheriting property. Or when the church was a wealthy hierarchical structure that controlled politics and created art. Objectively speaking, the Middle Ages were relatively decent – especially considering what came after Borgia, from Protestantism to industrialization.
If the English scientific revolution had happened 500 years later, but with the English fundamentalist Christianity’s not having materialized, I would take it.
Do you recall how the USSR was damaged morally after Chernobyl? This might be it, too. If the Chinese people destroy the Communist Party, it will be the end of the Chinese race as it was over for the Russians and Small Russians in the 1990s.
This coronavirus outbreak is nothing compared to the danger of capitalist anarchy that murdered and displaced tens of millions of Russians and Small Russians in the 1990s, 2000s and 2010s, and could as well turn the Chinese into LGBT faggots of the USA.
Only if you find Western media credible–about anything (as 6% of Americans do) and believe their nonsense about China. Here’s the scoop:
“Li Wenliang, a low-level physician at a hospital in Wuhan, learned at the end of that initial two weeks that some patients had been hospitalised with a coronavirus infection, impetuously presumed that virus to be SARS, then posted announcements on Chinese social media that SARS had returned to China with people in Wuhan already hospitalised.
“No one in China has forgotten SARS, these messages sparking alarm and panic, especially since they were forwarded in volume to many other recipients. Li was picked up and questioned by the police, reprimanded, and released after an hour. This was when the Western media began their circus.
“First, it is a crime in China to fabricate and spread rumors that disrupt the social order, a portion of Chinese culture that Westerners either cannot understand or refuse to accept. Li stated “I only wanted to remind my university classmates to be careful”, but when his startling messages went viral, he then admitted, “When I saw them circulating online, I realised that it was out of my control and I would probably be punished.” Hardly a surprise.
If Li’s concern were for a few friends he would have called them or sent private messages. Li is not a child, and he was fully aware of the virality of online posts as well as the protocols for dealing with potential epidemics. To have posted his claims openly on social media could obtain only one possible result – in fact the result it did obtain, which was to alarm and panic countless thousands of citizens.
Li was not reprimanded for “telling the truth” or for being a “whistleblower”, as CNN, CBS and the BBC tell us.
“Rather, he was reprimanded for reckless public behavior and for presuming authority he did not possess. No one appointed him the spokesman for either the national health authorities or the hospital. Li had no authority to make such premature public announcements, and he would know very well the result of a WeChat post with such content. From the same CNN article, Li wrote, “I was wondering why (the government’s) official notices were still saying there was no human-to-human transmission, and there were no healthcare workers infected.”
The medical authorities released that information as soon as it was verified and public notification became necessary, but Li appears determined to denigrate them with backhanded insinuations of lying to the public.” –From Larry Romanoff’s, ‘China’s Coronavirus – How the Western Media Spin the News’
https://www.globalresearch.ca/china-coronavirus-how-western-media-spin-news/5702888
“So, racial diversity is another thing that both superorganisms and human beings have in common.”
The difference with the bees is that technological civilization cannot be upheld by the Brown races. The moments hominins miscegenate, their memetic cultures degenerate, their machines rust. A miscegenated “superorganism” effectively does not exist – it dies a few centuries after being ushered into existence. (Hellenic kingdoms, Rome, America.)
“There you go with the free will stuff again.”
Do I? Are all psychic processes manifestations of free will? Do you deny the independent of biology existence of psyche?
It is not free will but the dialectics of psychohistory. The processes are not arbitrary, but are the resolution of the inherent contradictions of culture. Yes, they are based on the genes, but those are not exhaustive. From Montaigne to Marx, racial Jews have been caught up in the European memetic space, and thus have produced something conceivable to the rabbi’s flesh-eating culture.
“Women could own property in the Roman Empire, both before and after the Christian takeover, and in Sparta.”
In Rome, when it degenerated into an anti-racist economic empire. In Sparta, because their men were at war, and their women were forced to dominate their slaves.
“As far as I know, it’s not typical of Christianity, and I see no reason why you’d make that your criterion of what’s traditional or not. Just the fact that you personally approve of it is a pretty flimsy reason.”
Galatians 3:28. The Quran at least has numerous passages limiting women’s rights. Alawites can afford rejecting the existence of female souls outright. Whereas Christianity was cucked in antiquity (female deacons), and is now again.
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/women-worth-less.aspx
Objective reality approves of stripping women of their rights, as a society which does not, vanishes from existence. Traditional here = a higher degree of pagan, Aryan, healthy.
A great article! I wonder why the Western media are still trying to paint China black – isn’t every single American fuming at his mouth at the mere sight of any totalitarian socialist regime? Every single YouTuber is doing their work for them. Maybe just fodder for Wikipedia…
If this virus had only killed old people, this would have been a gift straight from the gods to China.
Still, why had the Party not banned the consumption of wild meats by 2020?
First, of course, they had to put those people into poverty. I mean, before they could "lift them out". And to a large extent "lifting them out" simply meant stopping doing most of the things that they had pledged that they would do when they came to power back in 1949 - and that they then spent the next roughly 40 years doing at the cost of millions of deaths, misery and destroyed lives.So "lifting China out of poverty" essentially meant stopping hitting themselves on the head with a hammer and then claiming to have found the cure for headaches.Very impressive, that Chinese government.Replies: @d dan, @last straw, @Adûnâi, @Glaivester
Secondly, have it even come to you that Chinese government is doing very well compare with every government in the history of mankind, like lifting 1 billion people out of poverty?
First, of course, they had to put those people into poverty. I mean, before they could “lift them out”.
Do you even history? Before 1949, China was in the Middle Ages. No technology, no roads, no cities, no medicine. Only bands of warlords killing one another, and the Japanese.
Poverty was the state of all hominins from 4k BCE to 1.9k CE.
The only argument here can be made that any government could have done the same, not just a socialist one. But that is debatable.
“There is a simple way of deciding which government is most likely to have designed, created and unleashed a bioweapon.”
Can you explain why Americans would ever decide to use a bioweapon “against China” if such an action would destroy the capitalist system around the world and cause a civil war in the U.S.? Are they suicidal to kill China? Or is this the best-case scenario for them? Or do they actively seek to crash the capitalist system?
Proof this is a bioweapon? I was laughing that this author implies Westerners are crackpots because they think China unleashed a bioweapon on its own people, whereas pro-China shills are out here saying it's a US bioweapon. Pot, kettle, and all the rest.
Right, you don’t care about whether one nuclear superpower attacks another or not
And you are here with your usual pro-China creeds. Same old same old.
your usual anti-China creeds
It is funny, because while people say China is handling this fine, it isn't a big deal, don't worry about it, China is the best, etc etc, they're welding people into their homes and violently restraining people for them to be carried away. It's ironic, therefore funny.
Only a depraved person will call this “funny”
I have no stake in China. It can go up or down and it has a marginal effect on me. What I do have is an aversion to China shilling. Unlike most articles on this website which are critical of systems, peoples, and states that have negative influences, every China article is just "China GOOD!" and people crying that everyone is too mean to Chinese people. As dearieme says at #6 China should stop pretending it's unfairly treated by the Western Press when nearly everyone is treated badly by their deceptive practices. You're not being singled out, that's their standard operating procedure.Would be great to see some Chinese people on here criticising their Government the same way Americans do, but that might land them in jail over there so the relentless shilling must continue.Replies: @Biff, @Alfred, @d dan, @Tom Welsh, @Aidan Q, @Astuteobservor II
would like to hide your anti-China feeling...To project image of neutrality?
China really should copy and translate stuff like this comment for the Chinese public.
So the Chinese public would understand how much hatred there is for them out in the world. Simply for them being Chinese.
Then they should prepared for war and to kill them all when shit hits the fan.
Why let toxic fuckers like this live if they want to kill you for no other reason then you are Chinese?
I really feel sorry for the Chinese.
Remember, fight back, and having the ability to end them in a single fight will save the rest from these toxic as fuck lunatics.
Very true. Sad and very telling. One can detect a lot of Schadenfreunde and not only among the deplorables of Unz Review. However, China is not forthcoming and not showing the full scope of what is happening. It is typical for any authoritarian system that perceives openness as weakness. If China wants to change the tone of the narrative it must shows its weakness and vulnerability and start asking for help.Replies: @Anonymous, @joe2.5, @d dan, @Pat Kittle, @Moi, @voicum, @Astuteobservor II, @Adûnâi
Instead of voicing support or encouraging solidarity–“We are Wuhan”—western corporate media have chosen to go all out to criticize and demonize China, sparing no effort to recycle and rekindle ugly, racist, orientalist, and dehumanizing trope s, using any perceived misstep, pretext, and shortcoming to tar China and the Chinese.
“It is typical for any authoritarian system that perceives openness as weakness. If China wants to change the tone of the narrative it must shows its weakness and vulnerability and start asking for help.”
Openness is a trademark of gays.
Never say sorry to Americans! The same as with SJWs – every American is an SJW effectively, they will never tire barking at you, the only way is to ignore them until they die from AIDS and shut up forever.
“Don’t you find it strange that China is blamed among the conspiracy theorists? That China is trying to self-harm itself?”
That’s not weird at all. That was the standard response of Ukrainians to the Donbass – “they are bombing their own houses”. Literally. And of course, nobody cares that it was Ukraine that attacked the Donbass, they did not consider their side the aggressor.
China will self-harm because they are EVIL.
“So the Chinese public would understand how much hatred there is for them out in the world. Simply for them being Chinese.”
Exactly. I supported China against Hong Kong. I supported Blizzard’s decision to punish the RoC propagandist in October. I am incredibly alone. The masses of the West are in a frenzied hysteria against anything Nazi, Soviet, Chinese or Juche. No arguments work. You cannot even conceive that Katyn was perpetrated by the Nazis. Or that Stalin was anything but a “mASs mUrDERer”.
It is like a social media outrage over Warcraft III: Reforged, but on an even larger scale, with even more lies and stupidity, and kept alive for decades. HBO’s Chernobyl full of lies? They gobble it up. Another southern Korean lie about allegedly “dead” North Koreans that routinely return back to life? The NPCs want more lies from the “defectors”!
“Imagine if it goes to India, Africa and other developing countries, how many millions will be infected?”
Why would that be a cause for grief? The fewer subhumans, the better. Personally, I am delighted that the DPRK’s quarantine seems to be working.
There is no humanity, there is nation. And nation is more than a sum of individuals.
“The immense venom with which some news media and online sources have attacked Chinese of duplicity and laziness dont surprise me”
But how does that reconcile with the rampant pro-Chinese propaganda in Western media regarding domestic anti-Chinese sentiment? As folks say, “Let the chink cough on you to proof you are not racist”. Or do you mean the anti-Party rhetoric? Because Westerners physically cannot utter a positive thing about any socialist party in history, this is nothing out of the ordinary.
“Are you referring to the extent of the anti Chinese(leadership) sentiment of the mainland Chinese highlighted and exaggerated by the western media ?”
No, I mean the general anti-racist rhetoric of the Western media. My question is this. How can you say the Western media are anti-Chinese if they will never condone building Auschwitz?
Or this. How are the Western media anti-Chinese if they tell Westerners to let chinks cough in their white faces to prove said Westerners not to be “racist” against said chinks?
But you are most likely a myopic anti-White “socialist” – a generic Christian who thinks America wants to kill all non-Whites (I wish).
“This isn’t over. Zionist elements in U.S. government have decided that to maintain dominance it is simple to assassinate (Soleimani) and use bio-warfare (Wuhan). Neither of these types of actions are the work of rational adults in an open room. They are the actions of ruthless psychopaths who have infiltrated the corridors of power throughout our world.”
If Americans had wanted to control the world, they would have conquered and exterminated Mexico by the 1890s. They would have conquered and exterminated the Philippines. They would have conquered and exterminated Japan in the 1920s.
They would have dropped nuclear bombs on Rio de Janeiro, Cairo, Delhi and Singapore in the 1940s.
Instead, Americans have cured the diseases of non-Whites, gifted non-Whites their own weapons and their own technology.
And yet still the Negroes are screaming about how barbarous White man is! Truly, to shut that whining voice, either the Negro or the European shall perish.
P.S. Why does your comment have a golden border?
1. Small countries that did not implement communism. None of the three, in particular Japan or Taiwan, is resource-rich in comparison with China, which has a large population but also a large land mass. 2. China cut itself off from the world. It was intentionally attempting autarchy. And now that it has not cut itself off, it can be more prosperous. But the underlying point is, I suppose, that China's rise depended on the evil West and could not have been achieved without the evil West. 3. What wars did China fight to defend its borders post 1949? Ther was alittle tussle with Vietnam. A spat with the Soviet Union. An aggrandisement in Tibet. Hardly big enough to hold China back. Or do you mean the constant threats against Taiwan's borders?4. China's technological progress strangely always lags that of the West. Funny that. Couldn't be because it always relies on technogical transfers of some kind (forced transfers, theft, spying, etc)? The point remains...the tyrranical and totalitarian system that dominates China is not responsible in a positive way for its current degree of economic prosperity. That is a result of Western forms of science and social organization. The Chinese aspects of Chinese government are in fact what hold it back.You may thank the West and express your heartfelt gratitude whenever you are ready. I wouldn't want you to lose any face.Replies: @d dan, @Biff, @last straw
As for the comparison with Japan, Taiwan, Korea, etc, ha, ha, another dumb point. Firstly, these are small countries. Secondly, they have firm supports of US – economically, financially, militarily, etc. Thirdly, unlike PRC, they (except Korea) don’t have to fight various wars to defend their border. And finally, even under the sanctions of both superpowers, China developed its own nuclear weapon, nuclear submarine, satellite, etc, a burden that none of these countries need to bear.
You are unaware that there was widespread cannibalism in some provinces during The Great Leap Forward? A little reading might be in order for you.
65 million dead from famine in that little policy failure. These were deaths that resulted from an intentional policy. Note that there was at no time any famine in Taiwan. Because they did not intentionally attempt to implement communism.
Capitalists are as likely implementing disastrous polices as communists. While the famine during GLF caused 16.5 million-30 million (2.5%-4.5% of the population) excess deaths in China, WW1 killed 20 million, or more than 4%, of the European population. WW2 was even worse: it killed more than 80 million worldwide, and maybe 40 million in Europe, more than 7% of its population. While the famine during GLF did have some natural causes (China did experience drought and flooding), both World Wars were purely man-made disasters.
1. Small countries that did not implement communism. None of the three, in particular Japan or Taiwan, is resource-rich in comparison with China, which has a large population but also a large land mass.
No, Japan is not communist, and it has an 80-year head-start over China since Meiji Restoration in 1868. However, that did not prevent it from making extremely bad decisions and bringing utter devastation to itself. By invading China and SE Asia, and initiating the Pacific War, Japan lost at least 3.1 million, or more than 4%, of its population. In addition, anywhere between 3 million to 14 million in Asia were killed by Japanese atrocities, depending on who you ask.
2. China cut itself off from the world. It was intentionally attempting autarchy. And now that it has not cut itself off, it can be more prosperous. But the underlying point is, I suppose, that China’s rise depended on the evil West and could not have been achieved without the evil West.
Nothing could be farther from the truth. China tried to establish good relations with those 3rd world countries that were not under the yoke of the West. They sent medical and construction teams to Africa. They played a rather active role in the early days of the Non-Aligned Movement. The west corporate elites had little intention to help China. What they liked was China’s cheap labor and potential market. I think they underestimated China.
3. What wars did China fight to defend its borders post 1949? Ther was alittle tussle with Vietnam. A spat with the Soviet Union. An aggrandisement in Tibet. Hardly big enough to hold China back. Or do you mean the constant threats against Taiwan’s borders?
The Korea War pretty much established China’s status in the international arena. China’s later development of nuclear weapons renders further actions unnecessary.
4. China’s technological progress strangely always lags that of the West. Funny that. Couldn’t be because it always relies on technogical transfers of some kind (forced transfers, theft, spying, etc)?
China has catched up or is already a leader in many fields: 5G, quantum communications, AI, supercomputers, satellite navigational systems etc etc. Not only that, China now has the world’s best academic institutions. It’s just a matter of time that China will pull farther ahead in many areas:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01920-1
It’s too late to accuse China this or that. The matter of fact is that industrial espionage is universal. Every developed countries developed by stealing other’s secrets. Only a fool will not do it. Only a hypocrite will criticize it. And only a looser will complain about it.
The point remains…the tyrranical and totalitarian system that dominates China is not responsible in a positive way for its current degree of economic prosperity. That is a result of Western forms of science and social organization. The Chinese aspects of Chinese government are in fact what hold it back.
China’s current government is a far-cry from the days of GLF and Culture Revolution. It will keep reforming, evolving, and improving. Time shall tell which form of government will be best for China in the future.
Many in the know, believe America has two options
As strange was it seems
The first occurrences in December appeared.
suddenly began telling it’s soldiers
CNY 2020 devistation!
Not fewer than five mistakes in one article! Do you even proofread?
At the beginning of February, Syrian daily newspaper Al-Thawra also claimed the coronavirus and other outbreaks were part of a US-China war.
“From Ebola, Zika, SARS, avian flu and swine flu, through anthrax and mad cow disease to the corona[virus] – [all these] deadly viruses were manufactured by the US and threaten to annihilate the peoples of the world,” the report alleged.
Typical magical thinking spewed by the low-IQ shitskin races of the world. Do not get me wrong, I understand this sentiment – yet it is merely an expression of their genetic hatred towards Aryans and Jews. There is no point using one’s brain to understand their thoughts logically.
If they used their brains, they would see a simple pattern – everywhere an American has gone, peace and prosperity have followed through. Everywhere where Americanism reigns, the Aryan dies, and the shitskin subhuman triumphs.* So what is to be afraid of for non-Aryans? Nothing. Their hatred is irrational as a matter of logical discourse – yet it is indeed meta-rational if one sees it as a tool of their rational racist hatred.
*Americans could have easily exterminated Mexico, the Philippines and Japan by 1945, but instead they implemented birth control in their own whorish lands, and vaccinated the Brown children. If you fail to see this biggest of jokes, you are blinded by the Red Giant of Christian liberal humanism.
I do not even have to read the entire article to say it is somewhere between Dog Barf and Bull Shit.
Just horseshit strung together to make people who do not know anything about Virology or Immunology or Biology or Medicine shiver in their boots.
I believe the authors are CIA folks trying to act like Bio-warfare is something real today.
It is not.
Also, lets look at reality for a second even if the US of morons, who can’t find their assholes with a mirror, could actually make such an amazing weapon.
1. No matter what anyone says you cannot control such a weapon. It will come back at you and kill you too. It is a biological entity and you have no control once it is released into the environment.
2. Look at the economic collapse that may be coming soon because of the slowdown in China’s Manufacturing of everything the world uses and needs especially the US of morons.
3. Nothing that has happened yet with the Corona Virus is unusual except to some $hit eating moron who wrote this pile of garbage.
Ron Unz has made a disgrace of himself by putting this crap on his website. I do have great respect for the site overall, but now none for the Editor.
A great research by a superbly courageous woman, Dilyana Gaytandzhieva: "The Pentagon Bio-weapon:" http://armswatch.com/the-pentagon-bio-weapons/
the US Air Force has issued calls for ethnic Russians to provide DNA samples for a mysterious “research” program. US Air Force Captain Beau Downey claimed that the samples were required for “locomotor studies to identify various biomarkers associated with trauma.”
Replies: @denk, @denk, @2stateshmustate
Pentagon contractors produce bio agents under diplomatic coverThe Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) has outsourced much of the work under the military program to private companies, which are not held accountable to Congress, and which can operate more freely and move around the rule of law. US civilian personnel performing work at The Lugar Center have also been given diplomatic immunity, although they are not diplomats. Hence, private companies can perform work, under diplomatic cover, for the US government without being under the direct control of the host state – in this case the Republic of Georgia. This practice is often used by the CIA to provide cover for its agents. Three private American companies work at the US bio-laboratory in Tbilisi – CH2M Hill, Battelle and Metabiota. In addition to the Pentagon, these private contractors perform research for the CIA and various other government agencies.
CH2M Hill has been awarded $341.5 million DTRA contracts under the Pentagon’s program for bio-laboratories in Georgia, Uganda, Tanzania, Iraq, Afghanistan, South East Asia. Half of this sum ($161.1 million), being allocated to The Lugar Center, under the Georgian contract. According to CH2M Hill, the US Company has secured biological agents and employed former bio warfare scientists at The Lugar Center. These are scientists who are working for another American company involved in the military program in Georgia – Battelle Memorial Institute. ...Amongst the secret experiments, performed by Battelle at NBACC, are: Assessment of powder dissemination technology ; Assessment of hazard posed by aerosolized toxins and Assessment of virulence of B. Pseudomallei (Meliodosis) as a function of aerosol particle in non-human primates. Melioidosis has the potential to be developed as a biological weapon, hence, it is classed as a category B. Bioterrorism Agent. B. Pseudomallei was studied by the US as a potential bioweapon in the past. ...The Pentagon: How to kill 625,000 people for just $0.29 cost per death.
Yesterday, I checked top 9 political parties of the Republic of Ireland on the matter of LGBT acceptance. Only one was against sodomy, one (Aontú)! And who is its leader? Peadar Tóibín (Peadar sounds suspiciously close to Russian pidor – paederast). LoL. And it got 41k votes! 1.9%!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Irish_general_election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aontú
Even this fat ugly woman “politician” has left the faggot circus and joined it. Where are the men? Where are the patres familias?
Why aren’t the DUP campaigning in the Republic of Ireland? Are there so few homopbobes among the Catholic worshippers of Jew Jesus?
“Have you seen someone who have been foot bind-ed?”
Was foot binding not a far better practice than modern incessant whoredom? Would you rather not take it over the new individualist rot of the Chinese society?
“Your professed indifference to slavery is exactly why it happened. People like you condone it and let it happened. It is exactly of people like you that it lasted a century before it was abolished.”
I for one oppose the enslavement of foreign races out of my fear of miscegenation. Not out of my disgust for slavery per se. Deal?
“Our leaders in business and government have brought us to a point at which a plague in China will destroy our livlihood in America — even if Americans don’t get sick. If the coronavirus, or some other illness in the future, becomes serious, the globalist system of which we are a part will suffer.”
This has been the case at least twice throughout history – in the Bronze Age collapse of the 12th ct. BCE, and during the fall of the degenerated and Christianized Roman Empire in the 3d-5th ct. CE. Our turn seems to be up, especially considering the failure of Hitlerism.
Sadly, it's by design.
This really is a question – empathy with the natural world seems to be very rare.
The depths of our souls, are like the depth of the oceans, full of wonder and possibilities and infinite mysteries. When children are exposed to nature, you're so right, it changes them. And not just children, but adults too.
The regular “consumer” turns into something else when he/she spends time with, and develops a feeling for plants and animals.
Doesn't it sort of ripe your heart out, that this critical issue has been coopted by the scumfucks of the world, as an excuse for them to have unlimited power to tax every breath, while encouraging billions more people (to tax), as the "solution" to it all?
This is a review that I wrote in 2016:
“Firstly, Chris Maser has written a very valuable book about the natural world and its problems which are worse now (2016) than when the book was published in 1992.
“That’s the whole motivation for the Yellow Vests in France. They were told they had to pay massively higher taxes, to save the planet, as France became flooded with super-prolific people from the Third World. (Oh, and they had to pay taxes to pay for that, as well). It’s a wonder they didn’t bring back the guillotine for Macron. (who deserves it, if anyone ever did ; ).”
Then why are they not murdering the immigrant Negroes? Why are they letting the swarthy-skinned inhabit their sacred temples? I believe you to be sorely mistaken. No Aryan in his right mind wants to exterminate the Neanderthals of this world, or to preserve Nature. All he wants is lower taxes, higher pay, and peaceful death when his daughters mingle with foreigners.
There are a couple of fresh scientific papers out that examine the nucleotide sequence of the virus. One whose full text is openly accessible is here
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22221751.2020.1719902
For the most part, the virus genome fairly closely resembles a known virus stain from bats, but the surface proteins – the ones which are most important in determining host cell type and host species – show striking variations from any known corona virus; in particular, there is one short protein sequence that shows extensive mutations and deletions (gaps) when aligned to proteins from other corona virus strains.
For your convenience, here is the protein sequence in question (as one-letter code)
MAYCWRCTSCCFSERFQNHNPQKEMATSTLQGCSLCLQLAVVVCNSLLTPFARCCWP
You can search for it here
https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastp&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&LINK_LOC=blasthome
It will tell you “No significant similarity found.”
This means that this protein sequence, or indeed anything recognisably similar to it, has not so far been observed in the wild, or otherwise been obtained and published in the open literature. It thus is unlikely to have been acquired by the novel strain simply through the exchange of gene fragments with another virus strain. This indeed suggests that the new virus may have been engineered in a laboratory.
I can understand how you could interpret it that way, but I don't agree.
This is but a projection of your imagination, and God tells us that He is to us as we regard Him, so that is what God is to you: someone for whom the antics of human beings must seem painfully mundane.
But there's a potential logical fallacy there. Since I consider what's 'knowable', as far more elusive than what' 'imaginable'. I appreciate your eloquence, but would simply prefer to consider God as far more 'imaginable', than 'knowable'. The latter being as aspiration, whereas the former is perhaps mortally achieved.
But this is not what God is. Nor is God what I think of Him, He transcends my imagination. Yet He is knowable, the Necessarily Existent One. This is an apparent conundrum, but only if we suppose that imagination and knowledge are one and the same.
They are not.
Exactly!
Why stop at one millennium? What act of significance has any human ever accomplished?
Oh, but I disagree. It's because we're not expected to rise to the expectations of a God, that our antics are all the more magnificent. We don't have to impress God, with our humble efforts, we only have to impress ourselves, and hopefully our loved ones, to feel perfect happiness and fulfillment. Richard Branson may have always wanted to go to space as a little boy. And now that he's on the cusp of his dreams, it isn't because he'll impress God, by doing so, but just that he'll impress himself.
Without acting to prove otherwise, the ultimate destination of such query is despair — not an ingredient conducive to acts of significance.
Right back at you, Sir!I’ve found mine. I’m not exactly sure what you’re looking for, but if you’re doing your best to refrain from war and hate, I’d say that’s a good start
Where are our great spiritual epiphanies, that uplift mankind from the primitive sludge, of war and hate?
I'm not talking about the vast majority, I'm talking about those who're so obsessed with their narrow agendas, that even as they know, that Brazil's rainforests (for instance) will not survive the unsustainable growth of human numbers in Brazil, that they DON"T CARE.You’re being a bit presumptuous, expecting documentary proof or evidence in hyperlinks and sound bites while the vast majority of the world doesn’t even have a web connection.
Why is it, almost none of the world’s religious or spiritual leaders seem to have any concern for the world’s oceans or myriad species, on the verge of extinction, for all time.
If humanity could learn what you've learned, then perhaps I'd wonder if there's isn't a God out there somewhere. Failing that, all I see is a baboon-like ape, consumed with an insane greed for more and more and more power, (over other humans). And I can't bring myself to imagine that a God would create such a species. (not on purpose, at least ; ).
despoiling the environment at the cost of my humanity is simply not an option.
It's not the vast majority that are the problem. It's the demonic elites, that are the problem. The ones who simply WILL NOT mention over-population, because from the Catholic Church, to Third World governments, to greedy cocksuckers like the Koch brothers, [one down...], our elites LOVE masses and masses of poor people to exploit, for their own nefarious agendas.
If we can afford organics and avoid plastic waste and reliance upon toxic chemicals, that’s great. Unfortunately, the vast majority of humankind cannot.
I've lived on less. I've lived on the streets dude, and out of my car, and come up from the bottom of society, so I know what it's like. I know what it's like to arrive at the day labor spot, and you arrive at 5:00 am, and then at about 6:00 am, maybe some guy arrives and says he needs three or five guys, and you work all day at some menial task, and you're given (back then) $20.00 for your trouble.
The average world salary is ~ $42/day. Sure, you can stretch it out longer in many parts of the world, but try it on for size and see how it fits with a wife and children to boot.
I can. All day long. Because for one, spiritual leaders are supposed to be better than the rest. But more to the point, my problem with 'spiritual leaders', is that it seems to me, that their all-consuming obsession, is always, always, ALWAYS to want and demand a bigger flock.
I can’t blame religious leaders for these problems because most of them would, at the very least, be no worse than others,
.. in the realm of man.Even if you perceive it as such, it does nothing to diminish the scope of its influence.
nothing more than the written word of men, trying their best to interpret a God.
Well, I have to acknowledge the truth of what you're saying.
That record made one of the most significant impacts on human history — and particularly that of western civilization — than any other. This fact is undeniable and until it is acknowledged and understood for what it’s worth, not a single individual delving into the “Jewish Question” will ever be able to answer it satisfactorily.
I don’t engage in the vanity that I have the power to upset or surprise God. He (It, Whatever) knows all. And as profound and intriguing as some human’s lives no doubt are (to other humans), I still imagine that everything going on in the vast universe, is rather more wonderous and encompassing (taken on the whole) than the (occasionally enigmatic) antics of humans, on planet Earth.
Is this logical, however? How do you infer that big JEW cares little for every human life from the dogma that he knows everything? In our society, there are people that devote their lives to ants (and those are even less relevant to us than microbes). I would posit the opposite – if big JEW outside & above Nature exists, he would care for every little life even more than the living themselves.
I’m not always sure there’s a God, but I am sure there’s a devil. And he resides in that damnable, intractable, human imperative for domination of his fellow humans. Power. At all costs.
If Aryans of America had been greedy for power enough, they would have long since nuked the Third World, and thus there would have been no overpopulation. But of course, that’s a blind spot of yours. Meanwhile, Zuckerberg has mixed his precious Jewish blood with a Chinese… They are destroying themselves just like the USSR right in front of our eyes, and you are still afraid of White man’s [suicidally ever weaker] desire for power!
P.S. “The important thing for them, is to exploit the rainforests” – Could you stop putting commas between the subject and the predicate?
“Why has Sweden let in so many Arabs? Are you going to blame that on the Jews? Which ones exactly? What about Greece? How did socialists ever gain a majority in Greece when Hitler killed off their tiny Jewish population?”
You are on the right track from the myopic monocausalism. But why are you blaming “leftism”? Do you not see that it is the Christian axiology that has equated the worth of all hominin life, European and non-European alike? It was the Catholic church that posited the existence of human rights for Amerindians in 1537.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublimis_Deus
https://chechar.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/red-giant/
Of course he signed it. LBJ was a tool of International Jewish supremacism. Duh.Speaking of LBJ, do you know what happened during the cowardly attack on the USS Liberty, John Johnson?When Israel was trying to sink our ship, with all hands, by napalming the deck (burning alive our sailors), and machine gunning the lifeboats in the water (a war crime). Do you know what the president of the United States, and Commander in Chief of the U.S. Military did?Eh?Why don't I tell you then..Because what that treasonous POS did, when our sailors were under cowardly attack, and somehow managed to get a distress call out to the Sixth Fleet, president Johnson ordered the jets (that had been scrambled to assist the Liberty) to be recalled, because he'd rather have seen our service men slaughtered to a man, rather than embarrass our bestest little buddy ever. Check it out for yourself.As far as France and Sweden are concerned, just check out this map. this tells you all the nations that are subservient to the shitty little state, created out of mass-murder and terrorism, and continues with that MO even today.https://i.pinimg.com/originals/44/63/39/446339d8f65922bdcd59b181d5ee93ff.pngSweden and France, (all their hysterical lies about human rights to the contrary), pledges fealty to a murderous, terrorist, racial supremacist Nazi-type rogue nation, or else. Tells you all you need to know about their "sovereignty" or ((who)) controls the puppet strings.Replies: @Adûnâi, @John Johnson
So LBJ isn’t responsible for signing it?
That map is outdated. Sweden now fully recognizes both Israel and Palestine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_the_State_of_Palestine
I’m astonished at the normally astute Patrick Cockburn’s elementary misreading of Sinn Fein. That party has long since ceased to be traditionally nationalist, especially in the Republic. In fact they’re the poster children for globohomo, at the forefront of gay rights, same-sex ‘marriage’ and possibly the most ‘progressive’ when it comes to divorce and abortion.
Their most damning betrayal of Ireland lies however in their policies on open borders which will exacerbate the ongoing ethnic dilution of the native population here. Their bloviating about the cost of accommodation and the difficulty in gaining access to schools and healthcare makes their position all the more hypocritical and renders the party’s name (Sinn Fein means ‘Ourselves Alone’) an inversion of reality.
Does Patrick not see the double-standard he's erecting here? Does he not understand that poor, unemployed workers in Co. Cork are reacting to their conditions no differently than the poor, unemployed workers in northern England? Does he not see that both are simply prioritizing their own immediate situations over the distant troubles of N. Ireland? And isn't such a response perfectly natural? Yet he persists in labeling the poor, unemployed workers in Leeds as 'arrogant', while showing empathy for the ones in Youghal. Curious ...
The motives of the Irish voters may have been social and economic, but the fact that a quarter of them plumped for Sinn Fein will have a profound influence on Northern Ireland and Ireland’s relations with Britain ...The arrogance and ignorance of Brexiteers when it comes to Ireland has infuriated Irish opinion over the last few years with the Home Secretary Priti Patel famously suggesting that the Irish, who have vivid memories of the Great Famine, could be starved into making concessions.
I think it is perfectly disgusting and shameless that the EU is using something as unfortunate (not to mention dangerous) as N. Ireland's troubles as a sleazy 'wedge issue' against the Brexiteers. I hope that more Irish wake up and start to see what a truly ugly and cynical organization the EU is. It is completely unworthy of the fine peoples of Europe. I believe in what Charles DeGalle said, that they should have a Europe of nations, rather than a nation of Europe.
Voters say that Brexit was not a significant influence on the way they cast their vote in the election, probably because they wrongly supposed that the problem was solved. But Ireland remains the EU’s front line state, which gives it influence in Brussels but ensures constant friction with the UK.
Oh? And where did Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil come from? Why, the latter was formed out of the pro-treaty faction of the IRA back in the twenties, while the former began as blue-shirt militant group in imitation of the Spanish Phalangists. (Some of them even went to Spain in the 30s to fight for Franco.) It turns out that more than one political party in Irish history began with the bullet and only later moved on to the ballot. But this sort of hypocrisy is precisely why ever larger numbers of Irish are becoming disgusted with the mainstream parties--which is what FG and FF are. Too bad they can't find a better protest party than SF.Replies: @Adûnâi
“Will anyone here object if, with a ballot box in this hand and an Armalite in this hand, we take power in Ireland?” These are not words that Sinn Fein’s many enemies are likely to allow it to forget, but during the election campaign just finished, Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil claims that the shadow of the gunman still tainted Sinn Fein were mostly ignored.
“I believe in what Charles DeGalle said, that they should have a Europe of nations, rather than a nation of Europe.”
Is that feasible, however? How can you wage wars of extermination against Turkey, Algeria and Egypt with a disunited Europe of varied cultures? Or do you think the fate of the continent to be an eventual bourgeois slumber?
Just as no one had ever been a Nazi in postwar Germany, no one in HK in 2030 will ever admit to having been yellow.
Why would you ever take the ravaged and castrated post-1945 Germany as an example of anything good? If anything, modern China = Nazi because they are proud of their country, have a strong Party and a willful Leader, and oppose America.
or more likely, a white parasite gweilo…because no one who have actually done a honest day of work in their life will say that LESS tourists is better ANY PLACE IN THE WORLD.
Interesting. Aren’t tourists effectively parasites? Aren’t tourists an eye sore? Aren’t tourists a threat to morals?
Dirty tourists spread disease. Degenerate tourists fuck your women. Lazy tourists turn your men into servers.
Waging wars of extermination in the ME? What are you talking about? Are you some kind of sick neocon or something?
Last time I checked, the wars the neocons have waged were not the wars of extermination, but purely profit-oriented. What any sensible person would propose would be such ventures that would aim at benefiting the people of Europa.
For example, conquering the Nile Valley and mass-genociding the native Egyptian population to light up a new star of the European constellation. Instead, our forefathers chose to build railroads and hospitals for the foreigners, and murder the bloom of Europa’s youth in the fields of Flanders.
Carolyn Yeager is Germanic and believes in chemtrails. Slavs, however, believe that Codex Argenteus was written in Cyrillic! Insanity knows no borders.
https://old.reddit.com/r/ukraine/comments/f65rwb/why_do_so_many_educated_ukrainians_believe_in/
And we all subscribe to the suicidal Christian idealist notions of the equality of man that have led us to giving women the right to owning property.
LOL. #203. Do I see that correctly? Adunai is agreeing with himself. Well, obviously he would. And he mentions … oh, never mind.
Sometimes, my comments take a few hours to appear. Although Unz Review seems to be light on censorship and conducive to good discussion (unlike the algorithm of YouTube that automatically removes comments, or the hivemind of Reddit that downvotes people into oblivion and soft-locks them with a 10-minute-long time limit), there are times when my comments do not go through at all, forever remaining visible to me only.
In those cases, I mark them with “Agree” – this way they appear on my profile, at least. And as I always archive everything I touch to the Waynack Machine & archive.li, they will never be lost.
Don’t let the anti-Turkish and anti-Islamic new right with their Zionist money read that!
Why can’t we hate all non-Whites? Turks, Syrians, Israeli Jews? Why is it that you have to love at least one nation of subhumans? If you love Jews for praising the woman who put a nail into the forehead of their enemy when he asked her for shelter in the desert, you are a Jewish shill. If you love Shia Islam for stoning whorish women to death, you’re a barbarian. If you are a simple White exterminationist racist, you can’t win.
Egypt should have been genocided and settled with Europeans by 1900. A new star of Europa could have been born, strengthening the ties between Germania and France. Instead, the sister Empires of Europa chose to spill their blood in the fields of Flanders, and then the vicious Frenchmen sent Negroes to rape German women…
On the contrary: Russians are describes in great details as suffering victims of Jewish lead Bolshevism.
And how did Russians suffer under Bolshevism? Stalin was given a country with a hoe, and left it with the atomic bomb.
The capitalist regime since 1991 has murdered or expelled tens of millions of Great and Little Russians. But you have nothing else to say except for muh’ Holodomor. Even though Little Russia reached its peak population in 1993 at 54 mil., under Bolschevismus, and now it’s at 37 mil., under capitalism. What a joke.
I would have supported Hitler, but this was a bad war between brotherly ideologies and sister nations.
The only parts of the USSR you could critique would be its female rights – although they are the reason Russians won the war (NS instead opted for immigration, ironically enough) – and the degeneration of the Communist Party after 1953. You should critique the Party for raising a generation that sold their country with not a single gunshot in 1991.
Presumably you are one of those cranks who thinks Solzhenitsyn was nothing other than an exaggerated liar.I am, however, amused by your apparent slavish belief that advances in technology are the surest signs of comprehensive human advancement.But even by that standard, you still will look foolish. Anyway, ever heard of Sikorsky? Or half a thousand other ethnic Russians who had to flee the Soviet Union, taking with them the brain power that would have made Russia a far stronger and smarter country had the Tsars never been destroyed by the Bolsheviks. Bolshevism was a monumental demographic disaster for the русский народ. If you are prepared to argue otherwise, then you are prepared to be an idiot.
And how did Russians suffer under Bolshevism? Stalin was given a country with a hoe, and left it with the atomic bomb.
The ambition of Hitler was not to only take back what had been by robbed from Germany by the treaty of Versailles. It was to found a GREATER GERMANIC REICH*), stretching from the Atlantic to the Urals. So that was far worse than the “Pan-Slavists” ever dreamed for themselves.
And yes, with regard to WW2 I am a “fence-sitter”, since I consider none of the parties in that conflict as “innocent”.
___________
*) See: Wikipedia, Greater Germanic Reich.
This is your citation?
*) See: Wikipedia, Greater Germanic Reich.
National Socialism didn’t make idiotic demands such as the Poles for “ancient Polish land”
It did. NS Germany started a war with the Western Powers over one pathetic city of Danzig and the suffering of a million Germans in Rzeczpospolita. Hitler should have damned them all to hell had he been a wise ruler. Instead, he opted for a stupid Hail Mary attempt to defeat both Poland and France. He won for a time in 1940 because the French gambled by moving their forces into Belgium – the only way they could have lost.
But of course, you will now cue up your revisionist moaning about how Germany did not start a war and how bad Rzeczpospolita was. What a joke.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
There was plenty of land if Africa to colonize, in Turkey, in Egypt, why fight Slavs?
there are still people who proudly think of the victory over the only European country that ever represented European independence and a feeling of European solidarity
European solidarity was represented quite well by the Warsaw Pact. No homosexuals, no Jews, no whores, strong men building factories and hospitals. All ruined because Russians rejected Stalin, and the Party degenerated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_Pact
Even Savitri Devi decried it in And Time Rolls On (pp. 158-159)!
There’s a former SS French correspondent of mine who wrote to me not long ago saying the Russians should’ve packed off Marx and kept Stalin. Instead of that, they put Stalin into the dustbin and kept Marx. […] The Russians are conquered. Communism is Jewish.
1. Re: Sinophobia – how can you explain then the media campaign to make Westerners lick doorknobs to prove they are not racist? Because it is such a myopic case – you either shout about Sinophilia or Sinophobia, never accounting for both.
Still, I agree overall, Sinophobia does prevail and is sanctioned. Last time I checked, both Styx and MisterMetokur can freely joke about “Winnie the Pooh”, but have you ever heard a Westerner’s talking about how dirty Negroes are? Negrophobia remains unthinkable, Sinophobia is cultivated.
2. Can you explain how the CIA could be behind the coronavirus? I agree that it is the most plausible explanation if the pandemic is artificial, but what is about the fact it will crash the entire capitalist system worldwide? Do you subscribe to Fursov’s conspiratorial idea that the “elites” want to usher in a new Dark Age? (Because then, count me in.)
Chinese culture values social responsibility higher than individual rights.
Then how can you explain this social experiment which shows that the Chinese people never help their racial kinsmen in need? There are children and girls abducted right in public spaces, and nobody bats an eye!
(Yes, it was conducted by the Formosans, and shared by an Eternal Anglo traitor from the Cape Colony.)
> “It is my opinion that over its history the Soviet regime changed rather often and rather dramatically.”
This recap of historical periods is something people generally do not do. They think in black-and-white terms (not races). It reminds me of how gamers rave about the Activision-Blizzard merger in 2008, but the history of Blizzard in fact has encompassed quite a few epochs in 1991-2020.
> “Does anybody even remember Chernenko?”
My mom does, she says her step-dad called him “Chernushkin”.
> “which goes something like this: “Russians have never known freedom and they don’t care about it. Russians have a slave mentality and all they want is some kind of dictator (Czar or Commissar – makes no difference to them) to rule over them with an iron fist“”
Does it not require a strong will to oppose liberalism that promises freedom and with it – moral decay and mortal decadence? Do you not need freedom to obey?
> “We all know about 9/11, but that is hardly a unique example.”
Please, don’t tell me that you believe in conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11.
> “And then, there are the much more serious cases, including the historical truth about the so-called “Holocaust”. Or, who carries the responsibility for starting WWII?”
Germany started it by foolishly attacking Poland.
> “cost us 66.7 million people”
Why did Solzhenitsyn say nothing of the evils of the modern genocidal Russian Judaeo-Christian regime under Yeltsin and Putin?
> “Sergei Lukianenko”
My favourite modern Russian writer is Viktor Pelevin. Especially his later works (not the earliest!).
> “During the Soviet period the Solzhenitsyn haters liked to refer to him as “Solzhenitser” (hinting that he might be a Jew). Nowadays, Solzhenitsyn haters in Russia refer to him as SoLZHEnitsyn (the letters “lzhe” means “lie” in Russian, suggesting that he is a liar). That tells you all you need to know about the degree of sophistication these folks are capable of…”
Russians are notorious for being the Niggers of the White race and unable to conduct a rational discussion. Check out this childish Little Russian video by Toronto TV aimed against one YouTuber supersharij – it is full of “funny” in-group jokes and nothing else! Nothing else!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-__D9Biw7cs
> “famous book, “Icebreaker” (“Ледокол”) in which Rezun, writing as “Viktor Suvorov” claimed”
You missed two commas here.
> “Depends whom you ask; due the hatred”
Prepositions on and to, respectively, are missing.
> “Khrushchev was the worst, most immoral, incompetent, hypocritical, inept and otherwise despicable Soviet leader ever”
Whom did Khrushchev betray? Was it not Stalin? Did he not betray Stalin just like the Russian people would later go on to betray their own Soviet Union, just as America betrayed its mother Germania, just as Clovis betrayed his Germanic gods?
> “Jeffrey’s formula is just another recycling of the myth that the Syrian opposition consisted of good folks who wanted to establish democracy in the country. In reality, it incorporated terrorist elements right from the beginning and groups like ISIS and the al-Qaeda affiliates rapidly assumed control of the violence.”
I am not sure why conscious and conscientious Westerners would rather support a Judaeo-Russian capitalist puppet Assad than the based al-Quaeda/ISIS warriors of Islam who behead people and stone whores.
Some groups in Russia are outright “mental”. The worst in the lot are the rabid Russian nationalists who think of themselves as Orthodox Christians and who actually believe that Stalin was, I kid you not, a Christian saint!!! I will spare you the full fairy tale these folks have come up with, but their bottom line is that at one point in Stalin’s life he remembered his early early education as a student in an Orthodox seminary and that he began to “resurrect Russia” at which point, you guessed it, “the Jews” killed him. They refer to him as “святой мученик Иосиф жидами убиенный” or “holy martyr Joseph killed by the Jews”.
What is wrong with such a reading? Traditional Christianity is not far from Stalinism, at least, in their actions. A strong state, a manly hierarchical order, a sacred doctrine, hatred towards foreigners and other LGBT elements…
such as the Munich Betrayal of 1938 with France and Great Britain to which the Soviets were uninvited while Austria and Czechoslovakia were gifted to Hitler for the courtesy of attacking Moscow
Again this silly point is being parroted by a myopic USSR-lover. Can you tell me, if that is correct, why then England and America supported Russia from 1941 onwards? One would think that at least in 1944, they should have definitely switched their Lend-Lease program to Germany. But no! They utterly annihilated Germany and gave half of Eurasia to the Soviet Union!
You cannot explain that. Unless you recognize the truth of the official story – the Westerners hated NatSoc more than Russia & Marxism together. They hated Hitlerianism so much, they sacrificed their own economic and geopolitical interests by giving Eurasia to Communists instead of letting it be divided among Germany, Italy & Japan.
USA has not existed since 12.23.1913.
What a moronic statement. So you have no problem with the America that gave its Negroes the rights equal to those of the Whites? Only when a big scary bank took power, only then America suddenly became bad?
And four years later, they entered the war against Germany! Four years! What a great case of swift corruption of an honest innocent nation by a big scary elite!
And you, of course, take no issue with the fact that American Aryans prayed and still pray to a dead Jewish angel Jesus.
That's it. Few want to see it.
In 1913 the zionist banking kabal took over the creation of the US currency...
The zionists have ruled America ever since.
Who has the power of the purse decides everything. It decides the wars, the graft, the fate of the founding race, the fate of relations between women and men, all of it.
Gold did not save Jews from Auschwitz. Political will trumps economics.
Otherwise, you are speaking like a Marxist.
Absolutely! Groucho is my muse and guiding star.
Otherwise, you are speaking like a Marxist.
This is the stumbling block of the modern mind. Politics IS economics. Politics IS religion. We have created boxes around aspects of the same bundle.
Political will trumps economics.
The German High Command had incredible balls. They attacked the Soviets, knowing full well they were at a 5:1 disadvantage in numbers and equipment.
An absolute and shameless lie. The German and allied forces had a advantage of 1.3:1 in June 1941. And by the population total, Germany and her allies did not lag that far behind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barbarossa

Money being issued by a private central bank taking a cut versus a national bank legislated by the Congress are two very distinct things. Anyone who fails to understand this fails to understand the History of the 20th century.
Can you not think for yourself? All you are saying is regurgitated garbage spewed as if by a robot.
The Congress was and is full of Jesus-worshippers who sold their race in 1861, in 1941 and in 1964. Why should I care whether their herd of animals issues their cursed Jewmerican paper, or a bunch of Jews from the Federal Reserve does? It’s all the same.
The Germans did not have any numerical superiority in June 1941 and it didn't take that long for them to find themselves in numerical inferiority, despite the gigantic losses they inflicted on the Soviet forces, which is telling about who really was preparing for total war and which side had a larger population base, even more so since Germany was not facing only the Soviets.
The German and allied forces had a advantage of 1.3:1 in June 1941. And by the population total, Germany and her allies did not lag that far behind
Replies: @Epigon
How important were these economic factors in deciding who won the war, and who lost? In answering this question it has always made sense to distinguish two periods of the conflict.
In the first period, economic considerations were less important than purely military factors. This was the phase of greatest success for the powers of the Axis, and it lasted roughly until the end of 1941 or into 1942 (the exact turning point differed by a few months among the different regional theatres). In this first period, the advantages of strategy and fighting power enabled Germany and Japan to inflict overwhelming defeats upon an economically superior combination of powers. The factors of strategic deception and surprise, speed of movement, skill in the concentration of forces and selection of objectives, martial tradition, and esprit de corps were all on their side.
...
In the second period of the war, which began in 1942, economic fundamentals reasserted themselves. The early advantages of the Axis were dissipated in a transition period of stalemate. A war of attrition developed in which the opposing forces ground each other down, with rising force levels and rising losses. Superior military qualities came to count for less than superior GDP and population numbers. The greater Allied capacity for taking risks, absorbing the cost of mistakes, replacing losses, and accumulating overwhelming quantitative superiority now turned the balance against the Axis. Ultimately, economics determined the outcome.3
Both Capitalism, with it’s artificial hyper-individualism, and, a closely paralleling Communism, with it’s artificial hyper-collectivism, are bad, spiritually lifeless, and anti-human systems of thought, as is their convergance and synthesis in global Multi-culturalism.
Are you not suffering from a case of Eurocentrism? Last time I checked, multiculturalism was only spreading in the West. Turkey, Iran, India, China – all of them are quite entrenched in their own values are are having none of the Western rot.
Humanity has been being played since 1776 and 1789 by the City of London.
Let me guess… The City of London inherited its money from Venice?
Either way, it’s all childish. The real world is not about money. The real picture is being painted with ideas – namely, the Christian axiology of the love towards the poor and the retarded. No wealth in the world will make a White man vote to give Negroes rights, and yet here we are.
Moreover, the power of the West and of multiculturalism is waning already – the Aryan stock is being depleted and drained, and the other three regions of the world have increasingly been turning towards radicalism – Turkey and Iran to its empires, India to radical Hinduism, China to its historical trade routs. Those “nefarious London elites” must be pretty suicidal in political matters, and pretty subservient to the dead Jew on the cross in questions spiritual.
If those elites had existed, they would have murdered all non-Whites by 1930 to begin with…
According to the lowest source I could find.
On the one hand, the Red Army was huge - having added four million men to its ranks in the previous three years and with a tank park of 23,106 vehicles in June of 1941.
I was in the Soviet Union for years, were you?
I studied the GPW my entire life, did you?
I read thousands of pages of Red Army documents after they were declassified, did you?
All that time and effort, and apparently you were unable to find:
– the number of tanks/AFVs in the Western Military districts which were the only ones engaged by Axis in Barbarossa.
– the breakdown of said inventory by type, age
– the breakdown of that inventory by fighting condition
Apparently, the expert you failed to read Shein’s book on this particular subject
Here is a nice guideline for tards like you – June 1941 saw 25392 tanks in Soviet inventory.
13981 were in western districts
12223 regular tanks (discounting chemical, engineer, special purpose)
Of these, only 337 KV-1, 132 KV-2, 635 T-34 without radio and 197 with radio.
275 KV-1 ready for action, 124 KV-2 ready for action, 599 T-34 ready for action and 195 radio-equipped ones ready for action.
Those are modern, 1940 and later designs. The rest are tankettes, light tanks, cavalry tanks, amphibious and scout tanks.
What this doesn’t include is the lack of trained crews fit to operate the modern tanks – these were in short supply as well.
Overall, the on-paper strength quickly drops down when a deep dive is performed into individual models – T-26, BT-7 – so the overall combat-ready AFV strength of Soviets facing the Axis was around 7000. They were opposed by a concentrated, well supplied and led force of 3658 tanks and 377 SPGs.
The main reason of Soviet actual strength being lower is both wear and tear (T-26 were old) and lack of spares, fuel due to chronic shortage of tractors, tracks and oil tanker trucks.
There were 3 T-26 in need of light repairs and maintenance for each T-26 ready for action ( 696 vs 2391) and just 6 of BT-7 were combat ready while 1020 BT-7 needed maintenance and repairs.
The beauty of archive records and statistics. So next time you want to start claiming you’re an expert and have read documents, do yourself a favour and keep your mouth shut.
So... you now confirm the 25k Tanks in the Red Army inventory... as if it was your fact.Sophist prick.Apology accepted asshole.
Here is a nice guideline for tards like you – June 1941 saw 25392 tanks in Soviet inventory.
Your own words asshole.
You’re an imbecile lecturing me to not be stupid, while unironically claming that Soviets fielded 25 000 tanks on June 22nd, 1941.
Your own words asshole.
You’re an imbecile lecturing me to not be stupid, while unironically claming that Soviets fielded 25 000 tanks on June 22nd, 1941.
In the context of Barbarossa, RKKA having 10 000 tanks in Caucasus, Siberia and Far East is irrelevant and you deliberately tried obfuscating the fact.
Furthermore, out of 13 000 tanks positioned to contest the Axis, almost half were not combat-ready and not deployed to combat. Let me guess – you think Soviets sent all those 1920s and 1930s dinosaurs into combat at some point?
Pilling on top of it, you now present 3000, when in reality there were 4000 Axis AFVs which were concentrated, prepared and ready to descend upon dispersed Soviet AFVs arranged in peacetime echelons behind the border.
Voila – your initial claim of 25 000 Soviet tanks facing 3000 German is gone – it was a case of 4000 German tanks deployed in focused spearheads surprising 7000 (1000 modern) Soviet tanks.
Symptomatic of Western mongoloids, you readily bundle scout and amphibious tanks, tankettes and 1930s Vickers 6-ton derivates (T-26) in order to make your case stronger.
Since German armoured halftracks and armoured cars perform much of the same duties as Soviet scout and amphibious light tanks – why not add them to German armour strength? That’s right – because your narrative breaks down.
The same is true if prime mover, heavy tractor and light vehicle comparison is made between Wehrmacht and RKKA.
In reality, most of Soviet AFV losses were due to abandonment, destruction by own crew, capture coming from lack of fuel and ammunition and strategic encirclement, not due to destruction in combat. Especially in case of (the only) modern Soviet designs at the time – KV and T-34
You think you’re the first fanboi trying to parrot the nonsensical account of 20 000 destroyed Soviet tanks in 1941? Since you have been found out and called out, you will now assume a smug stance and insist on semantics and sophistry.
I really like the “I sat in BT-5 therefore I am an expert and not a mong caught pushing a false narrative”
Germans had local and absolute army numerical superiority in Barbarossa. Fact.
“Germans lost 400 tanks” This statement immediately caught my eye – no doubt expert Zaloga must have serious sources backing this claim,
right?
As it turns out – no, he doesn’t.
Army Group Centre alone had 641 Total Write Offs until September – that is – the only loss category Germans counted.
Adding 131 and 174 losses by North and South Panzergruppen – well, what do you know? Expert Zaloga is dead wrong.
Those are burned up, ammoracked, disintegrated (find pictures of Pz III or Pz IV hit by 122 mm and 152 mm HE shells) tanks that no amount of depot and factory repair work could make combat ready.
Germans being on the strategic offensive could claim the battlefield afterward – so every Soviet tank was a total loss, while only total write offs were German losses.
Guess how this went once Soviets were on the offensive and German Big Cats were all but unsalvageable due to a combination of weight, lack of recovery vehicles, hostile skies and rapid pace of Soviet advances. Combined together, all these facts contributed to the fact that German K:D tank ratio dropped once Big Cats were introduced.
Correlation, but not causality.
And here we have our expert Zaloga claiming that all 4 German Panzergruppen had 400 losses between them.
Soviet tank losses for the full year of 1941 were higher than 20.000.
The critical difference between the German and Soviet experience was that after the border battles, the Wehrmacht controlled the battlefield, so PzKpfw 38(t) tanks that broke down remained in German hands and could be recovered and serviced. Soviet BT-7 tanks that broke down or ran out of fuel remained behind enemy lines and so were total losses.
The Soviets improved slowly but never really caught up, and this is why even late in the war, the Red Army would still suffer painful tactical defeats.
doesn’t reflect such critical qualitative characteristics as staffing levels, the level of combat training, the qualifications of the command staff, combat experience, and so on; in these criteria, the Red Army at the beginning of the war was noticeably inferior to the Wehrmacht.
Kavalerchik then comments
The inadequacies of the use of Soviet tanks, which are criticized in the aforementioned NKO Order No. 325 from 16 October 1942, ‘On the combat use of tank and mechanized units and formations’, look particularly sad against this backdrop: ( a very long list of these problems is given )
In fact, as I said, the problems were never entirely solved.
It is even more frustrating that such mistakes continued to occur even after the accumulation of a year’s experience of intensive combat operations, acquired at the cost of the heaviest losses. After all, many of these failings had been mentioned as early as 21 August 1941 in his order to the troops of the Reserve Front No. 005 ‘On the shortcomings of using tanks and measures to eliminate them’ from its commander, General of the Army G.K. Zhukov
Replies: @Korenchkin, @Korenchkin, @Epigon
..At the end of September, the Soviet defenders did not suffer from numerical inferiority, but there were other weaknesses to consider, the most fundamental of which was the lower combat power of the Soviet units, which resulted from inferior tactics, training and junior leadership.13( This difference would persist until the end of the war. We have discussed it previously, for example in N. Zetterling and A. Frankson, Kursk 1943—A Statisical Analysis (London: Frank Cass, 2000). ...
statement.. it's untrue:
closed again by the Russian government
> “The video you referenced is not Russian, but Ukrainian. They speak Ukrainian there, and it is written in Ukrainian. But I guess, you not being able to speak Russian, don’t know the difference huh.”
Little Russian is a dialect of Russian. You should have known that. Unless we are being here politically correct to my irrelevant pygmy nation of pseudohistorians and witches.
https://old.reddit.com/r/ukraine/comments/f65rwb/why_do_so_many_educated_ukrainians_believe_in/
> “didn’t commit any crimes in eastern Europe”
Do you consider gassing Jews a crime?
> “Hollywood was portraying the war not positive to the Germans.. why would they?”
Because Germans and Americans are of the same racial stock and have no grudges against each other?
> “But they have, and still are portraying the war from an AMERICAN/WESTERN point of view! They are under the impression that WW2 was this one big anti-Semitic operation, stopped only by the Americans and the Brits.. which is absurd.”
True, Americans view wars not as international fights, but as some weird anarchist struggle for absolute good. Americans have no notion of being a country (as they live on an island). Their propaganda never concerns itself with states, only individuals. Compare Batman to the DPRK propaganda. Batman is one superhuman policeman fighting robbers in a big city, whereas Koreans are a collective of factory workers, farmers, intelligentsia and soldiers battling foreign invaders shoulder to shoulder.
https://www.koreareaders.com/2020/01/dprk-posters-headon-breakthrough.html
> “They hardly ever mention the role USSR played, which had the biggest role in stopping the Nazis, or what was happening in eastern Europe, Lebensraum, attempted eradication and enslavement of the Slavic peoples, etc.”
What’s so bad about civilizing Slavdom? Wouldn’t you take it as a price for exterminating Jewry, Christianity, and saving the Nordic race?
Although I will be the first to admit the German foolishness for not preparing for total war before February 1943, for not recognizing the Ukraine in Lemberg and Kiev, and for preferring Christtard Melnykians to Banderians.
> “Russia is returning to Christianity and Putin is a Christian and Russia is the only nation standing in the way of the zionist greater Israel agenda and the NWO and this was predicted by Edgar Cayce decades ago,”
How can you pray to the god of the Jews and oppose Israel?
> “If not for Russia , Syria would have been lost”
And?.. Why would any White man care about some shithole MENA country?
North Koreans care – because they have a clear agenda of hurting the US geopolitical interests for the sake of their own proud nation. But you? You don’t hate America. You have nothing against the American people. You don’t even hate the Jews. You merely oppose the state of Israel because of the brown Palestinian children (who the cucked Israelis don’t actually dare to exterminate like the vermin they are).
Christian anti-semitism strikingly resembles the anti-White whining of the Negroes. Neither Christians nor Negroes have built a country of their own. Both Christians and Negroes will only stop their incessant scowling when they return to the inanimate matter from which they came.
Genesis of Slavic Eastern European countries is thoroughly Christian, right down to the alphabet which was created to convert them to Christianity
Neither Christians nor Negroes have built a country of their own
Bolshevik awfulness is testimony to the Germans failure to get more anti-Bolshevik fighters on their side
800 000 vs 12 million+
There is no proof that Stalin and his cohorts weren't true believers, even in private they still talked about the proleteriat, world communism and other nonsense
Trotsky, amongst likely others, who believed too strongly and fought too hard
> “Gorbachev was the first General Secretary who had never lived in a capitalist system, total indoctrination from birth failed to produce the Soviet man they had desired and so it all fell apart”
Well, that’s because Communism was built by the White man – everything built by White men turns to dust. Is the Capitalist West faring any better? At the precipice of oblivion currently.
Why has the DPR of Korea then succeeded in producing a man faithful to his country? Why is Kim Jong Un upholding Juche? Because traitors are rarer in the Korean race, yet the fidelious are uncommon among the Aryans.
So funny to see you discuss the matters of ideologies when all you have seen is European cucks. When you have shit fundamentals, no wonder everything turns to shit. It is deeply ingrained in the European psyche to pray to foreign gods and to despise our own blood.