You’re far too optimistic. The entire Christian west would be mobilized instantly, and nuclear strikes would be used if necessary. Israel must be protected at all costs. In addition to bribes, this is likely why Muslim countries have thus far tolerated Israel’s intolerable existence.
It sounds hypocritical to point out, but the Jews have been historically linked to the invention of paedophilia, including the rape of children and babies, sexual abuse of girls, and the production of pornography. In reality, Jews can be credited with various forms of human decadence. The Nazis have been accused of allegedly committing atrocious crimes by the Jews and their Russian, American, and European allies. However, it is important to acknowledge that no one has accused the Nazis of the crimes committed by the Jews against the Palestinians. Unlike the Jews, the Nazis were seen as morally responsible and cultured individuals. Comparing Jews to Nazis is an insult to humanity. Jews are viewed as dirty, monstrous animals, rather than humans.
You seem to be sure of a lot of things that are not true. How do you know that all we have done is looked in Wikipedia. I've been looking at "Truther" stuff for 20 years - reading THEIR stuff on THEIR websites, and none of it persuaded me.
This lame government propaganda illustrates another problem — Google is rigged to feed people propaganda. I’m sure you Googled something about “WTC collapse” or “NIST” and Google fed you this crap, plus a cite to Wokepedia.
And are you willing to acknowledge the contingent reality of the collapse of the 20 story Plasco building in Tehran in 2017, due to fire? Or the collapse of a 25 story building in Sao Paulo in 2018, again due to fire?
But if you or anyone else is interested in understanding and evaluating the actual case for the controlled demolition hypothesis in good faith, you can start by reading this report: “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses:’
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf
Truth-Deniers. Yes, we deny truth. Only people like you defend truth. You are the elect.
If the Truth-Deniers on this thread (like Mr. Anon, Intelligent Daesan, Kagonovich, Mark G, etc.) can first understand the case, but still decide that “it’s all Lies! I trust the Government!” Then so be it. At least their conclusion would then be semi-informed instead of emotional and faith-based.
I think that so-called Truthers have so poisoned the well of public opinion that they have rendered it virtually impossible, certainly very difficult, for there ever to be a real, substantive, and independent investigation about what really happened on 9/11.
Mission Accomplished!
Talk about turning the tables! Hypnotoad is Mossad! Well done.
idiot so do the musloids and they also sexually mutilate the females. this is also common in certain african tribes where it is clear almost everyone is insane
Did they notice you putting the liver back in the fridge,
or did they taste all about it?
Uhhh Italian and English
Curious same teaching and same academy, if so that would be interesting, other than that. You answer your own dilemma — attitudinal disposition. Different families, coaches, cities, countries, even different diets, training environmentsetc.
Now I have no idea of your description of the players in the video is accurate. But what you claim it shws is certainly now what is shown. In fact, the ;ast part of th video highlights a player who in my view appears black. This is a tournament from a variety of youth teams from a avriety of different places.
Your own description of the British team admits the players are not even on the same team — just because they may know each other — hardly classifies a group homogenized enough to draw the conclusions you suggest. In ga=fact noting yiu have said or what is displayed in the video names the case.
Not a single kike on Earth can be considered human. This satanic insect species must be wiped out of existence.
If Trump is owned by gangsters…if they own the mortgages on Trump’s facade of wealth then since Trump’s a “business man”… a “deal maker” then make a deal with Iran, Venezuela.
“Bail me out with the gangsters,” Trump should say to Venezuela and Iran and “I’ll leave you alone.”
If Trump does that then he has a free hand against the gangsters then.
These vicious criminals are the type of people who give Jews a bad name.
Mr Walters, great respect for your superior insights in these comment sections – they’re always a joy and an education to behold.
Just one push back with this comment. Jews have always had a bad name, given to them by God himself: meshubah, meaning apostate, or turned away.
Judaism is a perversion of the Old Testament, a clear departure from the ways of Moses. Judaism did not arise as a clean break from the Old Testament, as if you could go back and pin down a specific time and place when the Israelis got lost. Rather, it is the net result of trends that have always been a part of who they were, and their tendency to wander from God’s Word.
Judaism is the net result of Israel’s fleshly nature, their peculiar moral flaws as a nation, perverting divine revelation. Throughout the history of Israel, we can see how the best and most faithful kept trying to pull them back on track, but the truth is that they were never really there. The bulk of the nation was never faithful without a very active sword keeping them in line. Their foul nature was never far from the surface.
Those vicious criminals you perfectly describe are in fact true to their Jewish nature.
“Seizing the means of habitation”!
I like it. The new People’s Republic of New York City is going to give us lots of examples of means-seizing.
Public supermarkets: Seizing the means of victualization.
Revocation of public decency laws: Seizing the means of defecation.
Public day-care: ????????????
On the principle of "the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world" let's just call it 'Seizing power'.
Public day-care: ????????????
Many Jews boast with ‘pride’ that Israel is the ‘gayest country in the world’.
They’re right.
The whole Jewish Power trip has turned into taking pride in f***ing the World in the arse.
Yes he was flat-out lying, or you're misrepresenting what he said, I don't care. There should be throngs of people who paid $500 for a non-collectible book ready to sing your praises and back up your ridiculous claim. Language, melonfarmer. You picked a really weird hill to die on: the price on a book purchase that never happened. I'm not your Mistress Heather, I'm not your dom. Seek that elsewhere. Simply pointing out nonsense with very nice language, now don't y0u look pretty?Replies: @Ron Unz
So unless he was flat-out lying, copies of Icebreaker were indeed being bought and sold on the Internet for “upward of $500.”
Yes he was flat-out lying, or you’re misrepresenting what he said, I don’t care. There should be throngs of people who paid $500 for a non-collectible book ready to sing your praises and back up your ridiculous claim. Language, melonfarmer.
You’re a totally ranting lunatic. I’m explicitly quoting what he wrote in his 2010 article that I’d linked in my own 2018 article, which you’ve obviously still never bothered reading. Here’s the PDF:
https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Chronicles-2010apr-Navrozov.pdf
Unless I’m mistaken, you’d never heard of Icebreaker, its unusual publication history, nor the momentous historical events it presents.
Yet you are absolutely, positively certain that the reviewer for The Times of London is flat-out lying when he claimed that copies of that extremely rare book were sometimes bought for more than $500 during the 17 years after its publication.
Our website attracts all sorts of eccentric or deranged individuals, including those whose ignorance is only matched by their arrogance.
I assume you’ll now respond with a further wave of crude insults and invective to mask your embarrassing humiliation.
I’m really not at all sure that this website is suitable for someone like you.
I've had countless exchanges with Rurik over the years and read many hundreds (perhaps a thousands or more?) of his comments.
The funniest line from Rurik’s comment to you was when he fluffed himself by claiming to be The Unz Review’s self-appointed gatekeeper of truth and justice
If it's someone of Rurik's calibre - an exceedingly knowledgeable and unscrupulously honest individual - then it's a no brainer. We should be all for it.
In other words, there is no single individual that is the 'gatekeeper' - and Rurik would be the first to acknowledge that.
There are many hundreds (and more likely thousands) of such individuals participating in UR that challenge and regularly eviscerate the liars, the sayanim, the members of the (((tribe))) that come to this webzine to muddy the waters and defect attention from Jewish orchestration of these most egregious of crimes/hoaxes.
(eg: 9/11 False Flag, murder of JFK/RFK/JFK Jr, orchestration of WWI & II, the Covid Psyop and the Mass Cull of Humanity from the toxic clot shots, the Ukraine proxy war, the truth about ZOG orchestration of Charlie Kirk's murder, and much more).
“I’ve had countless exchanges with Rurik over the years and read many hundreds (perhaps a thousands or more?) of his comments.
And if Ron Unz ever appointed someone to be the gatekeeper of truth and justice, I can think of few (if any), that would be more suitable.”
You got rocks in your head.
Rurik has demonstrated on countless occasions that he’s a true American patriot, someone who invests his valuable time sharing his wisdom…
Contrast that to someone like you Felpo-dindo, seeing as you’ve been observed on numerous occasions acting in the capacity of apologist for Malignant International Jewry.
Then reality came knocking.
Remember: Just because you think something is true doesn’t mean that it is.
Rurik’s big whine with me is that I consider the “Palestinians” (in their own violent, deadbeat, welfare-for-life Muslim way) to be just as shitty as the Jews, while he sees them as little innocent angels on earth. I want neither of them getting my tax dollars nor living in the US of A.
Why did the Americans drop the bomb on Nagasaki so soon? Why not wait a bit?
It was because THEY WERE AFRAID THE JAPANESE WOULD SURRENDER BEFORE THEY COULD USE THE SECOND ONE.
We’re supposed to believe they were trying to intimidate the Soviets, when the cabinet meetings were full of advocates for sharing nuclear technology with the Soviets. The same way the United States government later consented to the Israeli Jews stealing enriched Uranium and other bomb components.
The atom was dropped because they wanted to kill all those people. That was the primary motivation. Never forget it.
This is both original and tenable/debatable as is this immediately below.
Ritual murder? You think there’s a better explanation?
But this is nonsense…
A better explanation for 9/11?
because its aim was to create the modern era of destroying American sovereignty as part of setting the groundwork for other Zionist geopolitical aims. Your theory replaces real world politics with religious speculation, obliterating the former.
No. the daylight surface of the Moon is not very bright at all, but in fact is rather dark. The average albedo of the surface of the Moon is about 0.12, meaning it reflects only about 12% of the sunlight hitting it, about the same as dark asphalt.Replies: @Mr. Anon, @xcd
Starlight is very faint and the daylight surface of the moon very bright.
No. the daylight surface of the Moon is not very bright at all, but in fact is rather dark. The average albedo of the surface of the Moon is about 0.12, meaning it reflects only about 12% of the sunlight hitting it, about the same as dark asphalt.
That’s true. The lunar surface is not highly reflective. But it is reflective enough, and the Sun so bright, that any camera adjusted to produce a clear non-washed-out image of Lunar features isn’t going to register any stars.
And the Sun is pretty bright. The Moon at night looks “bright” – bright white – because sunlight is quite intense by our standards of nighttime illumination. When you look at the Moon with the naked eye, you don’t see any stars around it, but obviously they are there.
I can’t believe people are still making – and falling for – this argument (I’m not saying that you did).
My ‘fear’ is due to reality.
No, your fear is irrational, and your response, comprised of manically discursive and occasionally vague references to cherry-picked events, leapfrogging centuries over the timeline and continents over the map, underscores the weakness of your position.
If Muslims were an existential threat to Christians, they would have wiped them out entirely, along with every trace of their religion, beginning in the 7th century CE when they had both the means and opportunity to do so.
You clearly haven’t traveled to the Muslim world to see how many ancient churches predating Islam are still in use by Christians. This fact alone completely demolishes your assertion.
The Bamiyan statue demolition wasn’t undertaken because Muslims ‘couldn’t handle another religion’. If the reason concerned Islam’s prohibition on statuary art, they would have destroyed those statues when the opportunity to do so arose three years prior. As Mullah Omar explained:
I did not want to destroy the Bamiyan Buddha. In fact, some foreigners came to me and said they would like to conduct the repair work of the Bamiyan Buddha that had been slightly damaged due to rains. This shocked me. I thought, these callous people have no regard for thousands of living human beings—the Afghans who are dying of hunger, but they are so concerned about non-living objects like the Buddha. This was extremely deplorable. That is why I ordered its destruction. Had they come for humanitarian work, I would have never ordered the Buddha’s destruction.
Also, the vast majority of Kurds are Muslim and they’re hardly ‘exterminated’. lol
It’s amusing that you have go as far back as the Barbary Wars to make your case. FWIW, Christian pirates and privateers were also very active in the Mediterranean at that time, so the capture of American vessels by Muslim corsairs was fairly customary for the time and place where it occurred. Of course, when you have a cartoonish view of history where you whitewash the reality of Christian participation in similar conduct, it’s hardly surprising that you arrive at the delusions you entertain.
This statement, for example, takes the proverbial cake:
It is true that when christians dominated the area, there were more peaceful relations.
Seems you know next to nothing about the spread of Christianity and how it compelled subject populations to submit or perish at the edge of the sword. Do some homework on the Theodosian Code for starters and get back to us with what you’ve learned.
Contrarily, Muslim conquerors never demanded conversion to Islam from their subject populations. You can also do some homework on that topic and get back to us. Seems like a pretty important difference, don’t you think?
Mamdani is a dyed-in-the-wool leftist, not a Muslim radical. Every time I see people like you freak out about him, I have to laugh. You think he wants shari’ah in NYC? lol Lord, you guys are credulous.
And history didn’t start in the 1600s.
No kidding?
Why are you so ignorant of it, then?
Americans still pretend to not know that the USA dropped its nukes in Japan to :
-test which is more efficient in killing civilians : the uranium-235 bomb dropped on Hiroshima or the plutonium-239 bomb dropped on Nagasaki ?
The uranium was more lethal and the US decided to go with uranium.
-the obtain some leverage against USSR ( that did not have nukes then ) because USSR had won WW II and the USA wanted an advantageous peace deal. This is how the USA was able to claim victory in WW II.
Never forget that the war was won by USSR, the Red Army defeated 80 % of elite Wehrmacht and the Americans entered the war late, when it was almost over, June 6 1944, after waiting almost 5 years to see which country is destroyed, Germany or USSR.
The Red Army was about to start the war against Japan and the Americans did not to see Japan defeated and occupied by USSR, so they dropped the bombs a few days earlier.
Americans pretend even now that there was no other option and they would do it again today, if needed.
This is a weasel-worded NIST propaganda press release that means nothing. Of course fire is generally a bad thing and should be avoided. The press release claims NIST had some general anti-fire recommendations and asserts that maybe someone was influenced by those recommendations. So what? Even if true (and no specific citation or evidence is given to believe it, anyway), that has nothing to do with any supposed acceptance of the premise that burning papers, drapes and carpets can implode a steel-framed skyscraper.This lame government propaganda illustrates another problem -- Google is rigged to feed people propaganda. I'm sure you Googled something about "WTC collapse" or "NIST" and Google fed you this crap, plus a cite to Wokepedia.But if you or anyone else is interested in understanding and evaluating the actual case for the controlled demolition hypothesis in good faith, you can start by reading this report: "15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses:'
NIST’s recommendations have had a significant impact on design and construction practices for high-rise buildings worldwide, including the new buildings at the rebuilt World Trade Center site.”
* * *
The case of WTC 7
The total collapse of WTC 7 at 5: 20 PM on 9/1 1 , shown in Fig. 2, is remarkable because it exemplified all the sig-nature features of an implosion: The building dropped in absolute free fall for the first 2. 25 seconds of its descent over a distance of 32 meters or eight stories [ 3] . Its transition from stasis to free fall was sudden, occurring in approximately one- half second. It fell symmetrically straight down. Its steel frame was almost entirely dismembered and deposited mostly inside the building's footprint, while most of its concrete was pulverized into tiny particles. Finally, the collapse was rapid, occurring in less than seven seconds.Given the nature of the collapse, any investigation adhering to the scientific method should have seriously considered the controlled demolition hypothesis, if not started with it. Instead, NIST ( as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency ( FEMA) , which conducted a preliminary study prior to the NIST investigation) began with the predetermined conclusion that the collapse was caused by fires.Trying to prove this predetermined conclusion was apparently difficult. FEMA's nine- month study concluded by saying, " The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence." NIST, meanwhile, had to postpone the release of its WTC 7 report from mid- 2005 to November 2008. As late as March 2006, NIST's lead investigator, Dr. Shyam Sunder, was quoted as saying, " Truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7."All the while, NIST was steadfast in ignoring evidence that conflicted with its predetermined conclusion.WTC 7 underwent free fall. When pressed about that matter during a technical briefing, Dr. Sunder dismissed it by saying, "[ A] free- fall time would be an object that has no structural components below it." But in the case of WTC 7, he claimed, "there was structural resistance that was provided." Only after being challenged by high school physics teacher David Chandler and by physics professor Steven Jones ( one of the authors of this article) , who had measured the fall on video, did NIST acknowledge a 2. 25- second period of free fall in its final report. Yet NIST's computer model shows no such period of free fall, nor did NIST attempt to explain how WTC 7 could have had "no structural components below it" for eight stories. Instead, NIST's final report provides an elaborate scenario involving an unprecedented failure mechanism: the thermal expansion of floor beams pushing an adjoin- ing girder off its seat. The alleged walk- off of this girder then supposedly caused an eight- floor cascade of floor failures, which, combined with the failure of two other girder connections-also due to thermal expansion-left a key column unsupported over nine stories, causing it to buckle. This single column failure allegedly precipitated the collapse of the entire interior structure, leaving the exterior unsupported as a hollow shell. The exterior columns then allegedly buckled over a two- second period and the entire exterior fell simultaneously as a unit [ 3] . NIST was able to arrive at this scenario only by omit- ting or misrepresenting critical structural features in its computer modelling. [ 4] Correcting just one of these errors renders NIST's collapse initiation indisputably impossible. Yet even with errors that were favorable to its predetermined conclusion, NIST's computer model ( see Fig. 3) fails to replicate the observed collapse, instead showing large deformations to the exterior that are not observed in the videos and showing no period of free fall. Also, the model terminates, without explanation, less than two seconds into the seven- second collapse. Unfortunately, NIST's computer modelling cannot be independently verified because NIST has refused to re- lease a large portion of its modelling data on the basis
that doing so "might jeopardize public safety."
Replies: @Corvinus, @Mr. Anon
Other Evidence Unexplained
Collapse mechanics discussed above are only a fraction of the available evidence indicating that the airplane impacts and ensuing fires did not cause the collapse of the Twin Towers. Videos show that the upper section of each tower disintegrated within the first four seconds of collapse. After that point, not a single video shows the up- per sections that purportedly descended all the way to the ground before being crushed. Videos and photographs also show numerous high-velocity bursts of debris being ejected from point- like sources ( see Fig. 5) . NIST refers to these as "puffs of smoke" but fails to properly analyze them [6] . NIST also provides no explanation for the midair pulverization of most of the towers' concrete, the near-total dismemberment of their steel frames, or the ejection of those materials up to 150 meters in all directions.NIST sidesteps the well- documented presence of molten metal throughout the debris field and asserts that the orange molten metal seen pouring out of WTC 2 for the seven minutes before its collapse was aluminum from the aircraft combined with organic materials ( see Fig. 6) D 6] . Yet experiments have shown that molten aluminum, even when mixed with organic materials, has a silvery appearance-thus suggesting that the orange molten metal was instead emanating from a thermite reaction being used to weaken the structure D 1 2] . Meanwhile, unreacted nano- thermitic material has since been discovered in multiple independent WTC dust samples [13].As for eye witness accounts some 56 witnesses including 35 first responders have been documented as saying that they saw, heard and/or felt explosions prior to and/or during the collapses [4] . That the Twin Towers were brought down with explosives appears to have been the initial prevailing view among most first responders . "I thought it was exploding, actually," said John Coyle, a fire marshals "Everyone I think at that point still thought these things were blown up." [15]
This lame government propaganda illustrates another problem — Google is rigged to feed people propaganda. I’m sure you Googled something about “WTC collapse” or “NIST” and Google fed you this crap, plus a cite to Wokepedia.
You seem to be sure of a lot of things that are not true. How do you know that all we have done is looked in Wikipedia. I’ve been looking at “Truther” stuff for 20 years – reading THEIR stuff on THEIR websites, and none of it persuaded me.
But if you or anyone else is interested in understanding and evaluating the actual case for the controlled demolition hypothesis in good faith, you can start by reading this report: “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses:’
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf
And are you willing to acknowledge the contingent reality of the collapse of the 20 story Plasco building in Tehran in 2017, due to fire? Or the collapse of a 25 story building in Sao Paulo in 2018, again due to fire?
And the claim that what happened in WTC1 and 2 were “office fires” is disingenuous twaddle. Those fires weren’t caused by popcorn left in a microwave. They were caused by a huge swath of the building being instantly ignited with the aid of an accelerant (jet fuel – lots of it). The fires may have been made still worse by burning aluminum (from the shredded airframe of the planes). And these firest raged unsupressed, as the sprinkler system didn’t work. The fires in WTC 7 could hardly be characterized as just “office fires” either as they raged unbattled all day.
Moreover, at least for WTC 1 and 2, it wasn’t just a fire; Both WTC1 and 2 sustained massive structural damage from the impacts, with large numbers of structural members on one side being severed.
Another thing you guys who think that fires can’t bring down steel buildings never answer: If fires can’t bring down a building, then why did they coat the steel structural members with fire protection? Isn’t that just an extravagant expense – to coat all the steel beams in the WTC with spray-on asbestos fire retardant – if it is so obviously unnecessary? Why did they do it?
If the Truth-Deniers on this thread (like Mr. Anon, Intelligent Daesan, Kagonovich, Mark G, etc.) can first understand the case, but still decide that “it’s all Lies! I trust the Government!” Then so be it. At least their conclusion would then be semi-informed instead of emotional and faith-based.
Truth-Deniers. Yes, we deny truth. Only people like you defend truth. You are the elect.
For a defender of The Truth, you sure lie a lot. Where have I said that I trust the Government? Where have I said that I don’t believe that the Government (some Government) had nothing to do with the attacks on 9/11?
Trutherism, as it hs developed, seems to have become a mental strait-jacket for most of its adherents. And it has proven to be a collossal failure. You don’t even hear about in public fora anymore (you used to, ca. 2004 or so). I think that so-called Truthers have so poisoned the well of public opinion that they have rendered it virtually impossible, certainly very difficult, for there ever to be a real, substantive, and independent investigation about what really happened on 9/11.
Mission Accomplished!
Talk about turning the tables! Hypnotoad is Mossad! Well done.
I think that so-called Truthers have so poisoned the well of public opinion that they have rendered it virtually impossible, certainly very difficult, for there ever to be a real, substantive, and independent investigation about what really happened on 9/11.
Mission Accomplished!
I was replying to another poster about a different document he pulled off the internet. This has nothing to do with whatever you have done, or not done.
How do you know that all we have done is looked in Wikipedia
Fine. I don't give a shit. I posted about three particular points with citations. I don't need to know your opinion about whatever other things you've read on the Internet over the last 20 years. Maybe you visited sites that were full of crap. Don't know and don't care.
I’ve been looking at “Truther” stuff for 20 years – reading THEIR stuff on THEIR websites, and none of it persuaded me.
I don't know about those. I think I once saw some very bad footage of the Tehran building fire. As I recall there was smoke everywhere and the building was creaking and groaning and coming apart in pieces. It didn't seem to resemble a free fall collapse at all. But my memory is hazy. You didn't give any link but I'll look up these incidents. To the extent the circumstances were actually similar to the WTC 7 collapse, that would tend to show that a collapse from an office fire is theoretically possible. So you could theoretically have made a point if that ends up being true.
And are you willing to acknowledge the contingent reality of the collapse of the 20 story Plasco building in Tehran in 2017, due to fire? Or the collapse of a 25 story building in Sao Paulo in 2018, again due to fire?
You said about a million times that "Truthers" and "Trutherism" are false. It's your term which you don't define. But it is normally referring to the people and the movement that claims that the government version of 9-11 is not the truth. If you are against "Trutherism" then you must be saying that the government is telling the truth -- i.e., you trust that it was 19 jihadists acting on their own with no involvement by the CIA, Mossad, etc.
For a defender of The Truth, you sure lie a lot. Where have I said that I trust the Government? Where have I said that I don’t believe that the Government (some Government) had nothing to do with the attacks on 9/11?
What have they done to "poison the well?" I have no idea what you are talking about. All I see are engineers and architects making solid scientific points. You call these people "nitwits" but you either can't or won't articulate a single specific thing that any of them is objectively wrong about.
so-called Truthers have so poisoned the well of public opinion that they have rendered it virtually impossible, certainly very difficult, for there ever to be a real, substantive, and independent investigation about what really happened on 9/11.
There were 125 people killed in the Pentagon because Dick Cheney himself refused to order (…). Yet Cheney was rewarded with at least a decade of extra life with an organ transplant?
Those 2 things might not be unrelated.
“Move To Israel” – The Daily Wire’s Former It Girl Brett Cooper Unloads
This is factually false. Hitler had indeed figured out that the Soviets were preparing to attack soon, and this was the result of many things, Soviet military operations in the German rear, worsening of the relationship, detection of a very possible new Soviet-Anglo-American encirclement, and also, fundamentally, the FACT that German intel began identifying over the months, increasingly massive disguised deployments of Red Army troops towards the Soviet western frontiers, construction of many military airfields and war material/munition depots in general, all very close to the borders and poised to support a large offensive operation. This is known from German documents captured in large numbers at the end of the war and most such intel documentation has been available for decades to interested historians. Needless to say most historians are NOT interested. What the German political and military leadership did not know was exactly when the Soviets would strike, that's true, but that is irrelevant to a preemptive war anyways, which is actually the only type of offensive warfare still admitted under current International Law, as preventive war is banned. Not that anybody cares, as one can see from the events of the last 25 years alone.
Irving and others have demonstrated that there’s no evidence that Hitler discovered that the Soviets were about to attack and quickly launched Barbarossa to forestall that.
Here is a taste from anti-Germany German Court historians and others in Europe;
“established historiography is now trying to save its positions [in order to keep Germany as an unprovoked aggressor] with the absurd thesis” [the Wehrmacht attack of June 22, 1941 [could] not have been a preemptive strike, because the German side [did] not detect any [military]threat[from the Soviets].” ... 'The current threat from the East is supposed to have been fabricated. What a mistake! Let's simply examine the veracity of these claims and what the documents from the Wehrmacht's intelligence services and their actions in the lead-up to the German-Soviet War reveal.
Since the Soviet Union, despite its various aggressions, including against Poland, was not at war, while Germany, after slammed with a war declaration by the Western Powers, had been unable to bring the British Empire to negotiate a peace even after their defeat in 1940 and knew that the US administration was behind it all, just waiting for a chance to directly join the war. This cannot be emphasized enough; the US entry into WWI on the side of the Entente provoked the disastrous defeat for Germany with the subsequent crushingly punishing treaties that provoked all that followed.Replies: @Ron Unz
(rough translation)
"In summary, the Reich government therefore declares that the Soviet government, contrary to the obligations it has undertaken, has:
1. not only continued but intensified its attempts to undermine Germany and Europe;
2. increasingly adopted a hostile foreign policy towards Germany;
3. deployed its entire military force, ready to spring into action, on the German border. With this, the Soviet government has broken its treaties with Germany and is about to stab Germany in the back during its struggle for survival."
Hitler had indeed figured out that the Soviets were preparing to attack soon…This is known from German documents captured in large numbers at the end of the war and most such intel documentation has been available for decades to interested historians. Needless to say most historians are NOT interested.
Well, that’s certainly possible. But if so, why didn’t Irving’s very detailed Hitler book provide any indication of that based upon the documentary records he used? I read the Hitler book a couple of years after writing my Suvorov article and was struck by seeing absolutely no indication that Hitler had discovered the Soviets were about to attack at the time he struck.
It’s certainly true that by the end of 1940, Hitler had become convinced that Stalin would attack at some point in the future and therefore began his own war preparations accordingly. But whether the Soviets might attack in 1941 or 1942 or even later wasn’t clear.
Since the Schwipper book is in German, I can’t read it, and anyway its 1,100 pages of text and documents sounds far too specialized for me to evaluate.
As for the official German statement at the time of the attack, I’d say it was mostly correct, but I’m not at all convinced the Germans had hard evidence to support it at the time they issued it.
Anyone who ignores facts because he believes "9/11 Trutherism" is automatically 'horseshit" is making exactly that claim. Maybe you didn't see their replies to me up the thread but Mr. Anon and Intelligent (sic) Daesin are making exactly such Grade-A level retard assertions.
I haven’t seen anyone claim “Israel and the Deep State therefore dindu nuthin’.”
Anyone who ignores facts because he believes “9/11 Trutherism” is automatically ‘horseshit” is making exactly that claim.
Your ardent ‘cause’ may be better served if you separate the physical destruction theories from the whodunnit / cui bono theories. You often conflate the two categories, which looks like your stated suspicions of ‘whodunnit’ necessarily rely on a theory that a “controlled demolition” happened, causing you to engage in confirmation bias to shore up your ‘whodunnit’ assertions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
Here’s how you can convince the skeptics in two main steps, in a necessary sequence (i.e., step two will be moot if you can’t convince skeptics of the first part):
First, concentrate solely on the covert physical destruction (i.e., disguised-method demolition) theory, citing evidence (using quotes) from non-crank sources. Once you’ve turned the ‘demolition’ skeptics to your side, then:
Second, having convinced your skeptics that a covert demolition action occurred, concentrate solely on the whodunnit theory: Provide citations from non-crank sources that whoever covertly demolished the Twin Towers and/or WTC 7 had the operational ability to do so, and indeed had personnel in place at some point to plan, prep, and execute the sleight-of-hand operation. This would require providing names and ranks/titles of the actual operators who prepped the building(s), and were in the chain of command leading up to and on the day of the attack.
If you’re not able to do any of the above, you’re gonna stay mad. 🙁
Yeah, I'll get you the names and numbers of each Mossad agent straightaway. What a stupid comment. Will no one rid me of these meddlesome Sealions?
This would require providing names and ranks/titles of the actual operators who prepped the building(s), and were in the chain of command leading up to and on the day of the attack.
I can take or leave most of Jimmy Buffet’s songs, but he definitely had the best song titles : “Weather’s Here, Wish You Were Beautiful”, “If The Phone Doesn’t Ring It’s Me”. And of course,
Video Link
Replies: @epebble
Analyst: Beyond Meat faces Chapter 11 bankruptcy as cash dwindles
Mother Gaia continues to show her favor to The Human Beings by punishing those who would steal the bounty from her people
Beyond Meat was over $200 in 2019. Now it is less than $2. TESLA Shareholders, take note.
“But there’s a middle ground that acknowledges that Jews should be judged as individuals, but that it also makes sense to talk about Jewish power as the consequence of the activism of particular Jews acting in particular influential groups. ”
Does individual Jew engage into activism for Israel without referring to other American or British or German Jews? Did campus protester target American Jews? Why did American Jews come into rescue for Israeli Jews ?Why did the start talking of shared pain and threats from protesters’s angst on Israel? Israel teaches a contradictiry and internally opposite theme . Itdoesnt want Jews to be ” collectivized” but it makes sure thst Jews act collectively.
McKay utterly bypasses the one interesting mystery still surrounding Dick Cheney’s career: What happened in the 1990s following Cheney’s impressive performance as George H.W. Bush’s Secretary of Defense that then led to his disastrous years as George W. Bush’s veep? Why did the man who prudently sided with GHWB to not go to Baghdad in 1991 fanatically encourage GWB to go to Baghdad in 2003?McKay never even raises this question.
Yes, Classic Sailer commentary. If you delve back into the archives in the 2000s, the commentary is quite steadily like this.Replies: @Hail, @Mr. Anon, @Hypnotoad666
And, as far as I can recall, McKay doesn’t even mention the word “neoconservative” in his movie, even though both Mr. and Mrs. Cheney were affiliated with the neocon American Enterprise Institute from 1993.AEI had long been a worthy but dull advocate of Chamber of Commerce conservatism, delivering many a comprehensive study of worker’s-comp reform. But it discovered that there was more donor money in agitating for war with Israel’s enemies. Over the course of the 1990s, neocons at AEI and elsewhere became obsessed with taking out Saddam.On Twitter on Sunday, McKay defended his plot, saying he’d substituted big oil for the neocons:But, in reality, the oil companies weren’t terribly enthusiastic for the Iraq War before it happened and didn’t profit much from it later. Instead of No War for Oil, we got War for No Oil.But for the preservation of one’s Hollywood career, it’s better to blame the energy industry. This might explain an otherwise puzzling speech in Vice in which McKay implies that Israel, like France and Germany, was against the war.
Fully aware of The Project for New American Century. And the letter they wrote to Clinton calling for overthrow of Saddam. We chose to acknowledge the pre-meditated nature of the invasion of Iraq through the energy commission and the maps of Iraqi oil fields…
But for the preservation of one’s Hollywood career, it’s better to blame the energy industry. This might explain an otherwise puzzling speech in Vice in which McKay implies that Israel, like France and Germany, was against the war.
Whoa! Why is Respectable 2025 Steve “platforming” this Groyper 2019 Steve? This seems highly Anti-Semitic. I expect The Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism will now require Steve to denounce and deplatform himself.
They’d probably cut him some slack if they knew he was Jewish. But if 2025 Steve does need to self-denounce, he can use the same template used by the Heritage guy who was denounced for failing to denounce Tucker for not denouncing Fuentes:
[2025 Steve] also said that he was not familiar with [2019 Steve]’s views when he posted . . . “I didn’t know much about this [2019 Steve] guy. I still don’t, which underscores the mistake,” . . . . <a title=”'https://www.nationalreview.com/news/heritage-president-apologizes-for-tucker-carlson-defense-video-in-heated-all-hands-meeting/
Incidentally, the Heritage guy’s worst crime was apparently that he troped.
He did, however, apologize to Heritage’s Jewish staffers for using the term “venomous coalition” to describe Carlson’s critics, saying that he was not consciously employing an antisemitic trope.
“The term ‘venomous coalition,’ a terrible choice of words, especially for our Jewish colleagues and friends who understand that, given history, to be a trope used against them. And I very sincerely — very, very, sincerely — apologize to you in particular, and to all of you for using that. It was not my intention to use a trope. I should have been better,” he said.
Personally, it seems to me that it should be worse to independently conclude that Jews are a “venomous coalition” rather than just relying on the general consensus of society (i.e., the trope). But I suppose the humiliation rituals applicable to non-performing Shabbos Goy have their own Talmudic logic or something.
Anyway . . . Fuentes gave an interesting name-check to Steve in his monologue again. While telling his supporters that they need to infiltrate the institutions while hiding their true beliefs he cites “Steve Sailer,” “Joe Lonsdale,” and “Chris Buskirk” (the last two guys I never heard of) as good examples of the type of masks you need to wear to pretend to be a card-carrying member of Conservatism, Inc. (Also, choice words for the new Lomez and Chris Rufo show being rolled out to appeal to Gen Z, Curtis Yarvin and assorted others).
https://rumble.com/v718mss-america-first-ep.-1591.html?start=11946
Interesting list! Over the years I’ve posted one-hit wonders from the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2010s.
Also MEH, it’s nice to be appreciated—I notice and value your Thanks and Agree tags.
“FUCK YOU.”
I’ll give you my address here in Medellin and I’ll say it to your face and you can say it to mine.
Next time you wanna spread false, silly propaganda and fake stories go to a kindergarten not in an adults place.
Oh I just remembered; we are in one. 😵💫
Barrett – you are DELUSIONAL. The jeet Mamdani will simply rip off American for his co-orcs as much as possible, and won’t DO one little thing to dislodge jewish power. Fuentes is, essentially, a pundit. I don’t dislike him, but he follows whatever trend is popular. He’s very much an online phenomenon and nothing else.
Since you are SO MUCH interested in finding out Chinese scientific achievements, why don’t you google the latest Chinese scientific and technological breakthroughs and innonvations? I know there are a lot of them. Do the search, it will do you good !!!
I’m not wrong about Lipstadt. Your own quotes show that she never claimed that 4 million Jews died at Auschwitz.
No, you’re dead-flat wrong and quite possibly dishonest. Here’s what you originally said and how I responded:
The wild figure of “4 million” at Auschwitz was rejected by historians such as Gerald Reitlinger and Raul Hilberg back in the 1950s and ’60s. That is not a “post-Soviet” development.
From what I remember, Deborah Lipstadt, the High Priestess of Holocaust Studies, absolutely accepted the 4M figure and ferociously denounced anyone who questioned it. She had vastly more public visibility on the issue than Reitlinger or Hilberg.
I had never said that anyone claimed that 4 million Jews died at Auschwitz but that the official narrative had long claimed that 4 million total victims were killed there and all those citations people found in Lipstadt, Gilbert, Dawidowicz, and others proved I was entirely correct.
You played the old trick of claiming that I had said something I hadn’t and then debunking it.
You’re just as dishonest and slippery as always.
https://archive.org/details/per_st-louis-post-dispatch_1960-03-17_82_76/page/n3/mode/1up?view=theater
ATLAS PHOTOGRAPHS RADIATION BELTS
BEDFORD, MASS., March 17 (UPI)—The Air Force reported yesterday that an Atlas intercontinental ballistic missile had photographed radiation belts circling the earth at an altitude of more than 700 miles.
[...]
Scientists explained that, despite the brief passage of the nose cone through lower limits of the innermost radiation belt, some 130,000,000 proton tracks were recorded in each cubic inch of the emulsions.
[...}
-- St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Thurs. Mar. 17, 1960
https://www.bnl.gov/newsroom/news.php?a=110415
New Study Questions the Effects of Cosmic Proton Radiation on Human Cells
February 1, 2006
UPTON, NY - In deep space, protons are the most abundant type of charged particle. Therefore, before astronauts can safely travel far from Earth for long periods of time, it is important to know how protons affect cells - particularly the cells' DNA. Now, at Brookhaven National Laboratory's NASA Space Radiation Laboratory, scientists have found that protons are more damaging to DNA than previously assumed. The work is published in the February 2006 edition of the journal Radiation Research.
"Scientists have been assuming that protons damage cells in a way similar to x-rays, but our results indicate that these assumptions have been wrong. The new data show that protons produce more potentially lethal double-strand breaks, a type of severe DNA damage, than other kinds of DNA damages," said Brookhaven biologist Betsy Sutherland, the study's lead researcher.-- Brookhaven National Laboratory
"This means that scientists don't really know how human DNA is affected by the most numerous particles in space and, as a result, do not know how to design the proper protection for astronauts."
Replies: @Kingsmeg
No, aluminum is not an effective shield for proton radiation, as it can create secondary protons when protons pass through it. While aluminum can stop less-energetic particles like alpha and beta radiation, protons are more penetrating and require materials with high atomic numbers (like iron or lead) or high hydrogen content (like polyethylene) to effectively stop them.
-- Google AI
“This means that scientists don’t really know how human DNA is affected by the most numerous particles in space and, as a result, do not know how to design the proper protection for astronauts.”
— Brookhaven National Laboratory
You would think that after sending 24 astronauts to the moon on Apollo missions, and then having access to those astronauts for decades until they died, they would have some idea.
By the time that genetic and DNA testing were becoming commonplace, in the 1980s (and really not widespread until the 1990s), the Apollo astronauts had mostly left NASA and retired from their various military branches. I'd be surprised if any of them volunteered their bodily fluids for science, given that they were all pilots who had come to despise flight surgeons, and NASA flight surgeons in particular. They no longer had to give a s**t, so they didn't.
You would think that after sending 24 astronauts to the moon on Apollo missions, and then having access to those astronauts for decades until they died, they would have some idea.
Correct. Thank you. The Muslim jeet is just there for the grift, and there’s that pic of him and Soros the younger.
I'd envision Moe, Larry, and Curly simultaneously headbutting each other in a brainstorming huddle, but I'd rather not offend the dignity of the stooges. 🕶️Replies: @Tennessee Jed
Maybe you Jameson and meamjojo can put your heads together and come up with a new catch phrase.
It seems jew morons come in sets of three.
I thought good ole Sparky was a troll but now I know he/she/it is……..
The pot calls the teacup black,
You and notanon really got all shook up by my comments about music the double standard, and Identity Politics, didn’t you? And now you’re both whirling around in the mosh pits of your minds seeing just how low you can go in the race to the bottom.
Squirm on, dude.
Couldn’t do it, could ya–visit the website I mentioned and learn something, let alone refute any of their presentations.
Of course he couldn’t. You and I could read what Bart Sibrel or Dave McGowan have written about the so-called “Moon Hoax”. I have. You probably have too. But morons like “Truth Vigilante” don’t want to know – they want to believe. So they won’t touch anything that might dispel their notions. Not that they would understand much of it anyway, as they are obviously not too bright.
The Moon Hoax is TV’s security blanket. As somebody who is highly sub-mediocre, it comforts him to believe that nobody in the past ever achieved anything of note.
> I think that the standard position taken by Holocaust Deniers is that Treblinka and those other two sites were merely transit camps.
Well, it’s simple enough to open a copy of Thomas Dalton, Debating the Holocaust, and read:
“Earlier in this book I suggested that revisionist analysis is consistent with using 10 percent of the orthodox numbers… taking 10 percent of Hilberg, we arrive at 80,000 as a nominal estimate.”
— P. 147.From the 2003 edition of Graf/Mattogno, Majdanek, p. 247:
“More than 40,000 Majdanek inmates died…”
Just those brief examples should be enough to justify what I had said:
I really don’t see how that very casual statement by Dalton carries any weight. Based upon your quote, it’s not even clear to what he was referring.
And your Graf/Mattogno reference is to Majdanek. Perhaps you somehow missed that I was referring to Treblinka and the other two Reinhard camps, Belzec and Sobibor. Or maybe you were just trying to pull a fast one and hoped that I wouldn’t notice.
The claim is that those latter three were all transit camps, so almost no one is buried there. Meanwhile the official narrative declares that the remains of around 1.5 million victims are buried there, which constitutes a pretty wide factual gulf.
Yes, nuclear reactors do not seem sensible in an era when government-sponsored terrorists of all stripes are running about. I wonder if the big push for small modular reactors (SMR) is really just because the blighted area associated with each reactor breach will be smaller?
One of the big clues about nuclear reactors is they are not really insurable.
History may show that August 6, 1945 was the end of the high trust society.
Sometimes you need a Stalin to whip things into shape.
Maybe,
And the King and Queen European ants would welcome them to the hive with open arms, just like their human counterparts.
Seriously Mr. annoying A-non-entity, you really think office fires brought down the twin towers and Building 7? Is Rurik making a valid claim when he says that?
@Dumb Abraham
No, I don’t think that “office fires” brought down the World Trade Center buildings. If you care what I think, you can read my posts in the relevant threads.
For myself, I don’t care what you think, and I certainly don’t care what that driveling idiot, “Rurik” thinks.
Like most fantasists, you are not intellectually honest. You were gassing on in a previous thread about the lunar lander looking like a toy made of bits of junk, and I showed you pictures of the underlying structure (I posted another picture here on this thread) and you just ignored it. That’s what all you clowns do. You say: what about “A”. Somebody answers your question, and then you say “but what about B”, etc., etc. No – go back to “A”. Tell us why you were wrong about “A”. At least admit that you full of s**t about the lunar lander. Your misconceptions are the result of ignorance and incuriosity. You espouse the “I don’t understand how something could work therefore it can’t possibly exist.
Now UR readers, do you notice that after saying this above, A-non-entity does not elaborate on exactly what caused, in his opinion, the WTC towers and the unstruck-by-a-plane Building 7 to collapse.
No, I don’t think that “office fires” brought down the World Trade Center buildings.
It is the gullible nitwits that are advocating for this preposterous Hoax - just as the same yarmulke adorned disinformers (and their shabbos goy underlings), were trying to defend the 'Magic Bullet* Theory' of the JFK assassination.
Summary: All you Moon Hoaxers (seeing as you believe in the ZOG orchestrated Apollo mission hoax), never lose sight of the fact that Mr A-non-entity, a confirmed Malignant Jew, is on your side in this argument.
And he's not just posting the occasional comment here and there in this thread.
He is in full 'Damage Control Mode' trying to salvage the indefensible official narrative of:
Men Walked on the Moon during the Apollo smoke and mirrors illusion.
He has been instructed to do this by his ADL controllers.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the equation are the likes of Yukon Jack, Iris, Laurent Guyenot, Erebus, the Apollo investigatory legend Bart Sibrel, myself and countless others.
Collectively we represent the 'APOLLO MOON MISSION SCEPTICS'.
We are certainly NOT Moon Hoaxers, seeing as WE'RE ACTIVELY WORKING TO EXPOSE THIS HOAX.
Ask 100 people on the street ( make sure they are somewhat knowledgeable about and know each artist), who is better
You live in a fantasy world. The results are already in.
Barbara Streisand holds the record for the most No. 1 albums by a female artist with 11 chart-topping albums.
Anyway, you overlooked a lot more memorable chanteuses than just Babs, so rather than wasting anymore time trying to educate you, I’ll just spin a couple more tunes:
Video Link
Jewel – “You Were Meant For me” – 1995
Video Link
Sheryl Crow – “All I Wanna Do” – 1993
Video Link
Paula Cole – “Where Have All The Cowboys Gone?” – 1997
Bart de Wever’s speech is interesting and his clarification of the distinction between frozen and immobilized assets is useful.
I wonder if Nabiullina and Putin have been counting on this issue?
Beyond the three points discussed, his message is loud and clear that Russia has to be defeated to make this bankster theft possible.
What happens next may depend on what the owners of Euroclear want to do. Maybe they create some exotic new financial ‘product’ which allows Euroclear to disburse the Russian funds, legalities be damned. We may be approaching that point.
I suppose de Wever is concerned that this mess could wreck Belgium. If he gets too squeamish, maybe Sanna Marin is looking for something else to foul.
If you permit me a long machine-translated quote from Anti-Suvorov by Russian historian Andrey Isaev.
Well, I looked at that 2,500 word machine-translated chapter, and it was mostly about WWI or the Polish campaign of WWII. He’s correct that the Poles very foolishly planned to mount an offensive against Germany in 1939 and I think their top general may have even boasted that he would capture Berlin.
But if anything, that would support what I’m saying about Barbarossa. The Germans were obviously planning an offensive, but the configuration of the Soviet forces indicates exactly the same thing on their side.
‘Salvation is from the Jews’ is a mistranslation of John 4:22. The correct translation is “for life is from Judah”
I feel that you have damaged your reputation as a “public intellectual”, until now unblemished, by calling Ron Unz “a very shallow thinker” or “a troll.” Both of these characterizations are risible.
‘Risible’? It’s worse than that. The commentator who described Ron Una as a “shallow thinker” sounds like an arrogant fool. Have you no gratitude, sir?
A rude remark like that is entirely inappropriate, uncalled for, disrespectful, and just plain wrong.
The lack of civility on this site is getting worse. Dear friends: please show better manners. It benefits us all.
Civility and manners are all well and good. But they should NEVER be used as an excuse to cover for the disinformation that is being peddled by the likes of you.
The lack of civility on this site is getting worse.
Dear friends: please show better manners. It benefits us all.
As opposed to what? What Bart Sibrel (a TV cameraman and taxi driver) say? What Bill Kaysing (a librarian) says? What insane lunatics like "Truth Vigilante" say? What drooling idiots like "Rurik" say?
So THEY say.
As opposed to what? What Bart Sibrel (a TV cameraman and taxi driver) say? What Bill Kaysing (a librarian) says? What insane lunatics like “Truth Vigilante” say? What drooling idiots like “Rurik” say?
For your information, there are scores of Russian scientists with STEM PhD’s who publicly say that the NASA Moon Landing was a Hoax. They say it on TV shows, write books about it, and manage very well informed websites.
One of the most prominent is Professor Alexander Popov, who has a PhD in Mathematics and another in Physics, who taught both subjects in Moscow Engineering Physics Institute for all of his professional life, and is author and co-author of 15 inventions and more than 100 publications in the field of laser technology, spectroscopy, absorption analysis, gas analysis, and laser optics. Laser optics, you know, the field that makes ground-breaking Quantum Physics technology the US is so far lagging behind…
TV and Rurik are in excellent company, first-class intellectual minds; don’t worry about them.👍
Scores, huh? And yet you only ever mention one - this Popov fellow.
For your information, there are scores of Russian scientists with STEM PhD’s who publicly say that the NASA Moon Landing was a Hoax. They say it on TV shows, write books about it, and manage very well informed websites.
Not aerospace engineering, I might add.
One of the most prominent is Professor Alexander Popov, who has a PhD in Mathematics and another in Physics, who taught both subjects in Moscow Engineering Physics Institute for all of his professional life, and is author and co-author of 15 inventions and more than 100 publications in the field of laser technology, spectroscopy, absorption analysis, gas analysis, and laser optics.
Lagging? Really? The US is lagging compared to Russia in.......what area of scientific research again?I watched part of some video with that guy Popov. He was rambling on about clouds, based on some low-resolution movie footage of the Apollo 11 launch. It's meaningless. He may be an expert on lasers - I have no idea. But he certainly hasn't provided any conclusive evidence that the Moon landings were faked. And nobody believes that he has, outside of you and a few other Russian chauvinists.
Laser optics, you know, the field that makes ground-breaking Quantum Physics technology the US is so far lagging behind…
With an electric chair, gas chamber and lethal injection table.
Remember this as we present you your shot and chaser. And, it’s vital you understand the state of Maryland is 33% black.
No it isn’t. Your reading ability is just 100% you.
Man is the one animal that doesn’t live by the law of nature. When the coyote decimates the rabbit population, the coyotes starve down to a number that allows the rabbit population to rebound. Then the coyote rebounds due to the ample supply of rabbits, again decimating the rabbit population.
Starting to get the idea?
Where did you get that? No-Shit? magazine?
When the coyote decimates the rabbit population, the coyotes starve down to a number that allows the rabbit population to rebound. Then the coyote rebounds due to the ample supply of rabbits, again decimating the rabbit population.
Billy Joel was off by a decade or so, but still… he sang this one at Madison Square Garden (Nazi territory) 45 years ago:
I’ve seen the lights go out on Broadway.
I saw the Empire State laid low.
And life went on beyond the Palisades.
They all bought Cadillacs and left there long ago.They held a concert out in Brooklyn
to watch the Island bridges blow.
They turned our power down,
and drove us underground,
but we went right on with the show (Oh, oh, oh)I’ve seen the lights go out on Broadway
I saw the ruins at my feet.
You know we almost didn’t notice it.
We’d seen it all the time on 42nd Street.They burned the churches up in Harlem
like in that Spanish Civil War.
The flames were everywhere,
but no one really cared.
It’d always burned up there before (Oh, oh, oh)I’ve seen the lights go out on Broadway.
I watched the mighty skyline fall.
The boats were waiting at the Battery.
The union went on strike, they never sailed at allThey sent a carrier out from Norfolk
and picked the Yankees up for free.
They said that Queens could stay,
they blew the Bronx away
Aad sank Manhattan out at sea.You know those lights were bright on Broadway.
That was so many years ago.
Before we all lived here in Florida,[Dammit!]
before the Mafia took over Mexico.There are not many who remember.
They say a handful still survive
to tell the world about
the way the lights went out
and keep the memory alive…
LIVE MUSIC IS BETTER!!
They have a superpower. When oppressed, some choose to hide amongst their host populations.
The Sephardic Jews fled to England and the Netherlands where they financed the British EIC and the Dutch VOC after being expelled from Catholic Spain. They also settled in New Amsterdam which later became New York in America.
Those in Spain who pretended to be Catholics were called the Marranos.
Forced to convert to Catholicism, the Marranos fled to Latin America where they settled and continued to practice their Jewish religion in secret while outwardly living a Catholic lifestyle.
Rep. Brandon Gill had filed Articles of Impeachment against Judge James Boasberg, the DC Circuit Court judge who has really made a name for himself.
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has upheld a ban on possessing guns in parks, while completely misunderstanding basic principles of law.
Video Link
https://twitter.com/opensrcdefense/status/1983953017960591450
https://twitter.com/BearingArmsCom/status/1986222014596571550
https://twitter.com/BearingArmsCom/status/1986176712929853809
https://twitter.com/BearingArmsCom/status/1986086127481024779
https://twitter.com/BearingArmsCom/status/1986071032466194734
Not sure what the plans for ChatGPT are. But I can put a reasonably high probability on it. Look at all these managers they got from facebook.
Germany is still an occupied country; the numerous American and British military bases show this to be so. Consequently the German government is forced to dance to the tune of the occupiers: The murderous and war mongering Brits and Yanks.
The German populace left to its own would have peace with everyone; well, the murderous Zionists excluded.
To this date Germany was and is the most peaceful country in Europe.
Great comment.
You said:
I think most actually do want to be good. They’re looking for a leader to lead them there.
So, in reality, most people want to be led, which means they can just as easily be led astray as be led to do good.
This is something (((they))) figured out a long time ago.
Health care for illegals matters more to them than anything else, especially white people
This is a typical response of a Trump supporter, an emperor who has NO BRAIN.
Thank God Mamdani won the mayor seat in the Jewish state of New York. Do you, like your emperor, think that Mamdani is an immigrant who uses the healthcare system illegally, like your emperor with NO brain? racists, racists, and racists. US must get out of the West Asia, Venezuela, Africa, Central Asia now or face a kick in the ass. You and your terrorist soldiers have migrated around the world in many countries, destroying other nations for your interest including your savage
DOG Israel. You are not in a position to talk about immigrants. You are immigrants to most of the countries on the planet. Tell your brainless emperor to get out fast. How did you capture Americas? You are invaders telling Mexicans not to come to their own land in California, Arizona, Texas and many other cities. Educate your gullible emperor.
Why is it so hard to list some of the actual innovations? The Nature index is great and a lot of nice work is surely being completed in China, apparently more than the rest of the world combined. This was expected by HBD aficionados at the Unz Review such as Anatoly Karlin based on the average IQ and population numbers in China. It is nice to see this confirmed, but not surprising.
If you look around online I am sure you can find something from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and similar organizations in various fields of investigation which list the top 100 Chinese innovations of the 21st century. Often these types of lists have useful descriptions of the work, intended for intelligent and educated non-specialists, which give the context, existing knowledge prior to the work and what is novel about the innovation. I still believe you will be pleased when you get around to doing this homework and posting such results. By “pleased” I mean really insufferable, but that’s OK because it would be nice for everyone to know more about the innovations. I am equally interested in the same sort of information for India, Russia and everywhere else but there seems to be a lot more going on in China so let’s start there.
“Satan II” – if you liked the Prince of Darkness in his feature debut, you’ll love the sequel!
Jews had complete control of Mao. They still control the import/export banks taking a % of everything that comes and goes. My money is on the Han Chinese for the long run tho.Replies: @antibeast
This business of Jewish banker and oligarch control of China, Japan or the Koreas is mostly chatter. They are trying desperately to do in the Far East what they did in the West. Only when they are able to change the mix with wholesale immigration will there be proof.
Jews had complete control of Mao. They still control the import/export banks taking a % of everything that comes and goes.
So the Jews had complete control of Mao? This is what Mao wrote of Israel:
Palestine took on increasing importance to China’s foreign policy objectives not only because of their struggle against imperialism, but because of Israel’s role as an outpost of the West. When Ahmad Shuqairi, Yasser Arafat’s predecessor, visited Beijing in 1965, Mao Zedong framed the Palestinian struggle in terms of a worldwide struggle against imperialism and for the liberation of Asia. Taiwan and Israel were both, in Mao’s view, proxies of the United States, and therefore the defeat of both were essential to the independence of Asia:
“Imperialism is afraid of China and of the Arabs. Israel and Formosa are bases of imperialism in Asia. You are the front gate of the great continent, and we are the rear. Their goal is the same. . . Asia is the biggest continent in the world, and the West wants to continue exploiting it. The West does not like us, and we must understand this fact. The Arab battle against the West is the battle against Israel. So boycott Europe and America, O Arabs!”
And Mao was a Zionist puppet?
Shuqairi’s delegation to China arrived in Beijing on March 17th, where he met Zhou Enlai for the first time since the Bandung Conference ten years prior. This time, their meeting would result in military aid in addition to rhetorical and diplomatic support. According to Shuqairi’s memoirs, Zhou Enlai promised free small-arms shipments to be routed through Egypt. The Soviet Union may have supported Nasser, but did not provide material aid to the PLO and backed the land-for-peace framework of U.N. resolution 242, which the Beijing review denounced as “humiliating.”
As the only major power willing to support the PLO, China’s aid was a significant factor in the PLO’s ability to establish itself as the de facto leader of the Palestinian national liberation movement. Israeli intelligence estimates that Chinese arms shipments to various PLO factions totaled $5 million, or $33 million adjusted for inflation, and included small arms and training for PLO officers in a military academy in Nanning.
SOURCE:
Hitler was a gentleman.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/our-modern-madhouse-exposes-collective-laziness-mind
Our Modern Madhouse Exposes A Collective Laziness Of Mind
In essence, a false dichotomy presents a situation as if there are only two mutually exclusive options, when in reality, there’s a spectrum, or third (or fourth, or fifth) paths lurking in the shadows. ||ideology||
Better a small nation with great ability than the opposite where you are, ie. a great nation (possibly) with no ability to improve the human condition.
I.e., Dick Cheney was JJ's kind of a Republican.Replies: @Hypnotoad666
There is some story where [Dick Cheney] took an entrance exam to a private college. The college examiner was looking over his test results and asked: Just how smart are you Dick?
He looked up and said….fuckin’ smart.
Love or hate him the guy was a character.
Dick Cheney was JJ’s kind of a Republican.
Not True! Cheney was a “Peacekeeper.” National Review says so. Apparently, his great achievement was keeping dumb Americans from getting a peace dividend when the Soviet Union collapsed, and instead laying the groundwork for the current war in Ukraine. Heckuva job, Dick.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/11/dick-cheney-peacekeeper/
How about Charles Kao, whose invention of fiber optics was considered so significant that he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2009?
The Asia Times article is nice and the large number of recent Chinese patents is certainly impressive. I would think the author could be troubled to specifically point out 10 of the more impactful Chinese inventions or patents of the past 25 years.
Great! This is nice example.
Lol
Are China-Russia really ready?
What are the names of the Jewish-Commie banks/corporations that control China?
Ummm...you need to learn how to read a room.
America is a very special and wonderful nation. We must pull together to protect our nation, our way of life. Life, liberty, and freedom....Ours is a unique nation. Ours is a special nation.
So, you love niggers and sandniggers? LOL. Spoken like a true cuck for the shyteskins.
Listen mental midget: Britain was planning to invade Europe by going through Greece.
Greece was overrun with partisan fighters which cost the Germans dearly; fine you say, but then face the consequences of reprisals without your synthetic outrage and crocodile tears.
You cite the above with doubt. Are you suggesting that a collapsing skyscraper normally would not generally “fall into its own footprint”? I mean, it would be weird if didn’t: Should the Twin Towers instead have bounced around like giant Slinkys before diving into the Hudson and swimming up river or something?
causing a building to free fall into its own footprint
Dunno about the rest of the site, but in this iSteve thread I haven’t seen anyone claim “Israel and the Deep State therefore dindu nuthin’.” If you have a beef in threads outside of iSteve, maybe go deal with it there.Replies: @Hypnotoad666
I’ve never seen such pig-headed, ignorant comments on this site as the ones claiming that “Trutherism” is wrong by definition and that Israel and the Deep State therefore dindu nuthin’.
I haven’t seen anyone claim “Israel and the Deep State therefore dindu nuthin’.”
Anyone who ignores facts because he believes “9/11 Trutherism” is automatically ‘horseshit” is making exactly that claim. Maybe you didn’t see their replies to me up the thread but Mr. Anon and Intelligent (sic) Daesin are making exactly such Grade-A level retard assertions.
I didn’t mean to necessarily paint you with the same brush. Your posts were merely annoying examples of Sealioning (a term which I learned on this thread about an hour ago).
Your ardent ‘cause’ may be better served if you separate the physical destruction theories from the whodunnit / cui bono theories. You often conflate the two categories, which looks like your stated suspicions of ‘whodunnit’ necessarily rely on a theory that a “controlled demolition” happened, causing you to engage in confirmation bias to shore up your ‘whodunnit’ assertions.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_biasHere’s how you can convince the skeptics in two main steps, in a necessary sequence (i.e., step two will be moot if you can’t convince skeptics of the first part):First, concentrate solely on the covert physical destruction (i.e., disguised-method demolition) theory, citing evidence (using quotes) from non-crank sources. Once you’ve turned the ‘demolition’ skeptics to your side, then:Second, having convinced your skeptics that a covert demolition action occurred, concentrate solely on the whodunnit theory: Provide citations from non-crank sources that whoever covertly demolished the Twin Towers and/or WTC 7 had the operational ability to do so, and indeed had personnel in place at some point to plan, prep, and execute the sleight-of-hand operation. This would require providing names and ranks/titles of the actual operators who prepped the building(s), and were in the chain of command leading up to and on the day of the attack.If you’re not able to do any of the above, you’re gonna stay mad. :(Replies: @Hypnotoad666
Anyone who ignores facts because he believes “9/11 Trutherism” is automatically ‘horseshit” is making exactly that claim.
You are as sick as your parents, JEW
The Israel lobby stays winning.
Fuentes is the Baal Shem Tov’s frog.
🙂
This “heresay” is one such belief, and it has been promoted by Jewish activists like Felix Untermeyer who was instrumental in getting the Scofield Bible, the basis of Christian Zionism, published by Oxford University Press in 1909.
I think you meant “heresy” and Samuel Untermyer.
LOL! Once again Fag Kevin gets all hot and bothered over a muslime being elected to U.S. office.
You did it again, everyone is a muslim, lol. Moshe, you’re a real pisser.
I think that persisting in this thesis and siding with a group of one-sided groupthink specimens of modest mental stature (although Laurent seems to be there, too) and also persistently avoiding mentioning Lebensraum and Directive 21, has damaged and unnecessarily compromised this blog, so with this I am ending what I perceived as a personal attack on my intelligence and what I considered unfinished business.
Is that typical of homosexuals? Because I really like Freddy Mercury and Liberace but you seem like a huge douche.
South Slavic was the primary language spoken
in Kosovo in the year 1,000 AD.
You wanna play dueling AI’s?
...And you remind me of a troll. Always the first to post. Always trying to confound the issue.Replies: @Dr. Krieger, @Brazilian Brainrot
Both of them remind me of some sleazy phony conman or actors playing some scripted role for the alt-rightards.
I think he may be a new type of hasbara troll to go with “Vibe Shift”. Cartoonishly anti-semetic.
I smell a rat.
Maybe you Jameson and meamjojo can put your heads together and come up with a new catch phrase.
I’d envision Moe, Larry, and Curly simultaneously headbutting each other in a brainstorming huddle, but I’d rather not offend the dignity of the stooges. 🕶️
Well, more than likely the wetbacks will be next screaming to tear down a White historical statue for one of pancho villa as they worked to get this rat-faced chopper jockey elected in NJ-
Still waiting for the links.
Thank you for joining the discussion again. With respect, I must say that this strikes me as the most unusual form of atheism I have ever encountered—a kind of “village atheism,” so to speak. I am not aware of any serious thinker who would suggest or imply, as you do, that Christianity hinges entirely on “the Abrahamic picture of God as a talking individual.” Even prominent atheists such as Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, the late Christopher Hitchens, George H. Smith, Paul Kurtz, J. L. Mackie, among others, would not approach the critique of a religion as historically and philosophically rich as Christianity in this way. Thinkers long before us have wrestled with these questions.
You also seem to suggest that only “rational people” are atheists, which overlooks a vast body of twentieth-century scholarship. Consider figures such as Mortimer Adler, Richard Swinburne, Jacques Maritain, Étienne Gilson, and Alvin Plantinga—are they all irrational? A fruitful engagement with just a small fraction of the literature from the past fifty years might help clarify these issues: Alvin Plantinga, God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God (New York: Cornell University Press, 1990); Warranted and Proper Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993); Warranted Christian Belief (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000); Peter van Inwagen, The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008); Richard Swinburne, The Existence of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979); William Lane Craig and Quentin Smith, Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995). This is only a small sample of the extensive work produced over the last fifty years.
If you are willing to take up the challenge, we could explore these issues in a structured debate and make the discussion publicly available. Let me know if you are interested.
By the way, have you had a chance to read my three articles which provided a critique of From Yahweh to Zion? With all due respect, I must emphasize that I find this book to be riddled with historical inaccuracies and permeated by confirmation bias, while serious scholarly studies that contradict its conclusions have been largely ignored. I have addressed these issues extensively in the three articles I have written in response to your work.
Well, Well, Well, look at at Mamdummy’s handlers-
https://nypost.com/2025/11/05/us-news/mamdani-to-be-accountable-to-radical-activists-groups
See, Loyalty, you're wrong. Ipso wiki factoid, case closed. I mean, it's even got footnotes!Do I need this? Fine. [/sarc]Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
Sailer has been described as a white supremacist and white nationalist,[6] including by the Southern Poverty Law Center[23][14] and the Columbia Journalism Review.[5]
If you can’t trust the SPLC who can you trust?
The whole thing of demanding “sources and citations” for things is kinda funny in itself. I think it’s a bunch of people who took a college 101 course on how to write a paper. So you do all this superficial BS of “proving” your case by citing a bunch of passages in some book. This give you the superficial form of having proven something without any of the substance.
It’s kind of a text based worldview too. As if these people can’t directly look at reality themselves.
The Christians who refused to convert in Antioch were burned to death.
The earliest Christian sources of information on the loss of Antioch to Muslim forces were Sebeos (~660 CE) and Theophanes the Confessor (758-815 CE), neither of whom corroborate your mythical account.
Later, Crusade-era chroniclers, such as William of Tyre, were given to exaggeration about the treatment of Christians at the hands of Muslims. Their accounts have since been relegated to the ‘never happened’ file by serious historians.
Thanks for the opportunity to kick your ass yet again, Dick.
I could do this all day. 🕶️
David Lean ★★★★★
I recall significant mentions of the 1916 German peace efforts in the April 1917 debates in Congress over Wilson’s call for a declaration of war. Check the Congressional Record, it’s all there.
Always liked”Lara’s Theme”brings back fond memories from watching the movie because the little redhead worked at the theater and I watched a lot of movies waiting for her to get off work.
Well, Noodle(s), it’d be interesting to know why you persist in this online circle-jerk with you, yourself, and thy…
Who was there in Germany in 1939-45 who actually advocated a ‘good neighbor’ policy towards the Poles?
WHO in Germany advocated a ‘good neighbor’ policy in 1933-1939?
NOR collaborated with German forces to orchestrate the Easter Pogrom, attacking Jewish homes..
What’s NOR?
Post WW1 was a complicated time for most Europeans, Noodle(s). So, it was ultimately Germany causing all the havoc? Where are you getting your info? Wikipedia?
Vladimir Putin called NS-era Polish ambassador in Berlin, Jósef Lipski, “a bastard and anti-Semitic pig.”
Edward Rydz-Śmigły said, “If the German remains an adversary, he is not less a European and an homme d’ordre… The Russian is a barbarian, an Asiatic, a corrupt and poisonous element, with which any contact is perilous and any compromise, lethal.”
Josef Pilsudski signed a treaty with Germany in 1934.
The Poles were all over the place, sparring with Russia, sparring with Germany, menacing the Lithuanians and parts of Silesia, with France goading and funding them along. And, the ethnic Poles seemed all too happy to jump right on the ausrotten die Juden bandwagon once the Germans had had enough of Jewish/Bolshevik meddling and instigating. Polish “antisemitism” was raging in Poland, after all, and with Germans for cover, why not give way to an opportunity for revenge and reprisal?
Poland was GUILTY of resenting the status of the Jews in Poland, for no reason whatsoever, and for not doing enough/more for The Jews, a transgression made by everyone else in the world all the time, and that’s why Poland keeps all that direct and original-source evidence buried somewhere at Treblinka with all those corpses than can never be exhumed/verified/identified due to a rather convenient Talmudic law about disturbing burial sites conveniently marked Here Be The Chosen.
But, way to flop around, Noodle. Wielgus. John Johnson. Anyone else?
The Inside Story of The Peace Conference , Dr. E.J. Dillon
Of all the collectivities whose interests were furthered at the Conference, the Jews had perhaps the most resourceful and certainly the most influential….But the Western Jews, who championed their Eastern brothers, proceeded to demand a further concession which many of their own co-religionists hastened to disclaim as dangerous—a kind of autonomy which Rumanian, Polish, and Russian statesmen, as well as many of their Jewish fellow-subjects, regarded as tantamount to the creation of a state within the state…
The head of the Polish delegation, Roman Dmowski…appeared at the Conference under all the disadvantages that could be heaped upon a man who has incurred the resentment of the most powerful international body of modern times. He had the misfortune to have the Jews of the world as his adversaries….His ardent nationalist sentiments placed him in antagonism to every movement that ran counter to the progress of his country on nationalist lines….M. Dmowski moves with the national away from the international…The frequency with which the leading spirits of Bolshevism turn out to be Jews…
Porn is available on various adult websites for entertainment.
Always choose safe platforms for a protected experience.
Like many animals, ones that physically mature faster tend to rely on physicality than thought to get by. Growing a surgeon or physicist had to take more input than athletic sperm donor.
“Sky High” is a great song. I also very much like the band Chicago, for example, “25 or 6 to 4.”

BTW, my implied criticism of Jimmy Buffett was only implied, and what I really was saying was that I don’t know his work much other than “Margaritaville.” (Then I remembered “Cheeseburger in Paradise,” and I thought, well, maybe I’m not wrong…)
Your example of his ex-pat song is very good, though. I must admit. Thanks.
I have memories of that a a small child, earliest kinda memories. I think it became a water park after that, I think I remember a drowning in the wave pool in the 80’s.
Remember when Bowie was white? Lol
AI will eliminate all government, all politicians and all money. Everything will be free. Humans can create or watch sports all day or get wasted all day or combine the above.
"The only hope to save ourselves from Trump’s authoritarianism is mass movements. We must build alternative centers of power — including political parties, media, labor unions and universities — to give a voice and agency to those who have been disempowered by our two ruling parties, especially the working class and working poor."
Are Soylent Green tanks anything like gas chambers?
Mother Gaia continues to show her favor to The Human Beings by punishing those who would steal the bounty from her people and sell Buffalo fart products without paying royalties.
https://www.thestreet.com/restaurants/creditsafe-flags-chapter-11-bankruptcy-risk-for-beyond-meat
Analyst: Beyond Meat faces Chapter 11 bankruptcy as cash dwindles
Almost everyone overlooks that Germany did not lose World War I, but rather that the result was a draw and that November 11th is Armistice Day, not Victory Day.
Have you read the terms of that armistice?
Have you read the terms of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles?
If those were the results of a German draw, then the 1871 Armistice of Versailles and Treaty of Frankfurt were the results of a French win in comparison.
Couldn’t do it, could ya–visit the website I mentioned and learn something, let alone refute any of their presentations.
Your moniker isn’t apt, TV.
Of course he couldn't. You and I could read what Bart Sibrel or Dave McGowan have written about the so-called "Moon Hoax". I have. You probably have too. But morons like "Truth Vigilante" don't want to know - they want to believe. So they won't touch anything that might dispel their notions. Not that they would understand much of it anyway, as they are obviously not too bright.
Couldn’t do it, could ya–visit the website I mentioned and learn something, let alone refute any of their presentations.
You know, I hear that all the time.
Couldn’t do it, could ya–visit the website I mentioned and learn something
I'd be flattering them to say they were merely halfwits.
NOT WELL READ - many of them are semi literate.
Additionally, the overwhelming bulk of them are VERY LAZY.
The bulk of what they know on ANY subject is what they've gleaned from 30 sec sound bytes, from slogans and from bumper stickers.
(**Seeing as Ron Unz will likely avoid addressing why the Apollo 11 crew are so downcast at that Press Conference, I await the responses from the ZOG aligned Moon Hoaxers. Let's see what convoluted explanation they come up with).
Summary: Of course these are/were individuals with some integrity. They KNOW that they're participating in an IMMENSE FRAUD - and they can't hide their emotions.
This is just the beginning UR readers.
This comment has been long enough already, so I will finish up in a moment.
But many of my future comments in this thread will be short excerpts from Mazzuccos doco.
EACH OF THOSE will, at a minimum, raise serious doubts about the official narrative - and many will single handedly eviscerate the juvenile notion that Men Walked on the Moon.
But collectively they will prove emphatically that the Apollo Moon Missions were a monumental fraud - a fraud that only a gullible On-The-Spectrum retard would swallow (much like the similarly minded Greta Thunberg swallowed the Anthropogenic Global Warming nonsense).
So you're on board with my whole "dig her up and fuck her to death again" plan? Of course I'd have to work with the grand kids' schedule, they shouldn't have to miss it again.Replies: @Trinity
I can’t stop you from fantasizing about my late mom, but that makes you a necrophiliac.
I thought good ole Sparky was a troll but now I know he/she/it is……..
The pot calls the teacup black,
I thought good ole Sparky was a troll but now I know he/she/it is……..
The saddest thing about the whole affair is some ‘brown’ guy has bigger balls than virtually all the white male candidates
WTF are you talking about? Mamdumbass is just as sackless as the white men. He has only talked at this point. Something unwashed pajeets do CONTINUALLY.
I don’t know how far this unspellable foreign Moslem Commie will really get with his programmes in NYC, but this kind of thing only hits home when you come home. Watch this scene, and see what I mean, say in my post Bolshevik Zohran Kwame Mamdani on seizing the means of habitation.

You’ve got to go to the post for Lara’s Theme.
.
We’ve got a lot of artiste/literati types here, so I hope many of you will know the reference, having watched or even read Dr. Zhivago.