The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Hua Bin Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir ISteve Community James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Al X Griz Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred De Zayas Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Bailey Schwab Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Britannicus Brittany Smith Brooke C.D. Corax C.J. Miller Caitlin Johnstone Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar ChatGPT Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Harvin Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Courtney Alabama Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David M. Zsutty David Martin David North David Skrbina David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Don Wassall Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens E. Geist Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Douglas Stephenson F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Key Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Ganainm Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gavin Newsom Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgia Hayduke Georgianne Nienaber Gerhard Grasruck Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Godfree Roberts Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Garros Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano H.G. Reza Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugh Perry Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras James W. Smith Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Janko Vukic Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jeremy Kuzmarov Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Mamer Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Atwill Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel Davis Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonas E. Alexis Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jorge Besada Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Correro Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth A. Carlson Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin DeAnna Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marc Sills Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Marcy Winograd Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Battaglioli Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Neville Hodgkinson Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Haenseler Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani R, Weiler Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Raymond Wolters Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Faussette Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Rob Crease Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Rose Pinochet RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Seaghan Breathnach Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Starr Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sybil Fares Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Wyatt Reed Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Austin Metcalf Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betar US Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Canary Mission Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Kushner Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlie Kirk Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colombia Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story Covert Action COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Crypto Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Cole David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Deportation Abyss Deportations Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Easter Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Enoch Powell Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve FEMA Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franklin Scandal Franz Boas Fraud Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom Freemasons French French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Flotilla GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Hell Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Huddled Masses Huey Newton Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Inbreeding Income Income Tax India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA Javier Milei JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Paul Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Miller Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Karmelo Anthony Kash Patel Kashmir Katy Perry Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry Ellison Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Maria Corina Machado Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Immigration Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monopoly Monotheism Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natanz Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Deal New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New Testament New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz Noam Chomsky Nobel Peace Prize Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition Nvidia NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise OFAC Oil Oil Industry OJ Simpson Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palantir Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Craig Roberts Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Petro Poroshenko Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Postindustrialism Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qasem Soleimani Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quiet Skies R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race-Ism Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rare Earths Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Red Sea Refugee Crisis Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romans Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds Roy Cohn RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satan Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Bessent Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Steven Witkoff Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tariffs Tatars Taxation Taxes Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Congress US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US State Department USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Civilization Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Race White Racialism White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Whitney Webb Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zohran Mamdani Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
All Comments
 All Comments
    As American warships patrol Caribbean waters and F-35 fighters prowl Venezuelan airspace, hawkish voices in Washington paint an enticing picture: A swift military operation to topple Nicolás Maduro, similar to the easy interventions in Grenada (1983) and Panama (1989). It’s a dangerous fantasy that ignores three decades of failed Venezuelan policy and fundamentally misunderstands the...
  • @NobodyImportant
    @Same old same old

    They can easily invade that little country if they joined forces and surrounded them. Not even the U.S. could prevent that from happening. Just imagine if every single Islamic nation combined forces. Israel would be royally screwed. Iran alone was able to kick the hell out of them.

    Replies: @Same old same old

    You’re far too optimistic. The entire Christian west would be mobilized instantly, and nuclear strikes would be used if necessary. Israel must be protected at all costs. In addition to bribes, this is likely why Muslim countries have thus far tolerated Israel’s intolerable existence.

  • The recognizable ancestor of the IDF is not the Marquis De Sade, a mere sexual deviant, but your common serial killer with added pathological paraphilia, and the ability to industrialize the scale of his crimes. As I had remarked before, patterns of arousal—the commingling of serial killing and sex—are tied to psychopathy. The psychopathic fusion...
  • It sounds hypocritical to point out, but the Jews have been historically linked to the invention of paedophilia, including the rape of children and babies, sexual abuse of girls, and the production of pornography. In reality, Jews can be credited with various forms of human decadence. The Nazis have been accused of allegedly committing atrocious crimes by the Jews and their Russian, American, and European allies. However, it is important to acknowledge that no one has accused the Nazis of the crimes committed by the Jews against the Palestinians. Unlike the Jews, the Nazis were seen as morally responsible and cultured individuals. Comparing Jews to Nazis is an insult to humanity. Jews are viewed as dirty, monstrous animals, rather than humans.

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Mr. Anon
    @Hypnotoad666


    This lame government propaganda illustrates another problem — Google is rigged to feed people propaganda. I’m sure you Googled something about “WTC collapse” or “NIST” and Google fed you this crap, plus a cite to Wokepedia.
     
    You seem to be sure of a lot of things that are not true. How do you know that all we have done is looked in Wikipedia. I've been looking at "Truther" stuff for 20 years - reading THEIR stuff on THEIR websites, and none of it persuaded me.

    But if you or anyone else is interested in understanding and evaluating the actual case for the controlled demolition hypothesis in good faith, you can start by reading this report: “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses:’
    https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf
     
    And are you willing to acknowledge the contingent reality of the collapse of the 20 story Plasco building in Tehran in 2017, due to fire? Or the collapse of a 25 story building in Sao Paulo in 2018, again due to fire?

    And the claim that what happened in WTC1 and 2 were "office fires" is disingenuous twaddle. Those fires weren't caused by popcorn left in a microwave. They were caused by a huge swath of the building being instantly ignited with the aid of an accelerant (jet fuel - lots of it). The fires may have been made still worse by burning aluminum (from the shredded airframe of the planes). And these firest raged unsupressed, as the sprinkler system didn't work. The fires in WTC 7 could hardly be characterized as just "office fires" either as they raged unbattled all day.

    Moreover, at least for WTC 1 and 2, it wasn't just a fire; Both WTC1 and 2 sustained massive structural damage from the impacts, with large numbers of structural members on one side being severed.

    Another thing you guys who think that fires can't bring down steel buildings never answer: If fires can't bring down a building, then why did they coat the steel structural members with fire protection? Isn't that just an extravagant expense - to coat all the steel beams in the WTC with spray-on asbestos fire retardant - if it is so obviously unnecessary? Why did they do it?

    If the Truth-Deniers on this thread (like Mr. Anon, Intelligent Daesan, Kagonovich, Mark G, etc.) can first understand the case, but still decide that “it’s all Lies! I trust the Government!” Then so be it. At least their conclusion would then be semi-informed instead of emotional and faith-based.
     
    Truth-Deniers. Yes, we deny truth. Only people like you defend truth. You are the elect.

    For a defender of The Truth, you sure lie a lot. Where have I said that I trust the Government? Where have I said that I don't believe that the Government (some Government) had nothing to do with the attacks on 9/11?

    Trutherism, as it hs developed, seems to have become a mental strait-jacket for most of its adherents. And it has proven to be a collossal failure. You don't even hear about in public fora anymore (you used to, ca. 2004 or so). I think that so-called Truthers have so poisoned the well of public opinion that they have rendered it virtually impossible, certainly very difficult, for there ever to be a real, substantive, and independent investigation about what really happened on 9/11.

    Mission Accomplished!

    Replies: @kaganovitch, @Hypnotoad666

    I think that so-called Truthers have so poisoned the well of public opinion that they have rendered it virtually impossible, certainly very difficult, for there ever to be a real, substantive, and independent investigation about what really happened on 9/11.

    Mission Accomplished!

    Talk about turning the tables! Hypnotoad is Mossad! Well done.

  • The recognizable ancestor of the IDF is not the Marquis De Sade, a mere sexual deviant, but your common serial killer with added pathological paraphilia, and the ability to industrialize the scale of his crimes. As I had remarked before, patterns of arousal—the commingling of serial killing and sex—are tied to psychopathy. The psychopathic fusion...
  • @Mr. Crowley
    What did you expect? One must question the sanity of any person or group of people that slices a piece of their dong off (circumcision) or sanctions it..

    Replies: @blackcatmendoza, @dms578, @Same old same old

    idiot so do the musloids and they also sexually mutilate the females. this is also common in certain african tribes where it is clear almost everyone is insane

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes: Video and transcript Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes has gotten considerable coverage in the media, e.g., “Tucker Carlson discusses ‘these Zionist Jews’ with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes in The Times of Israel” and “Heritage Foundation president stands by Tucker Carlson after host platforms antisemitism” in the Jewish Telegraph Agency....
  • @notanonymoushere
    That was a long article. My parents had a policy: if masturbation takes more than 15 minutes you're doing it wrong. And yes, if you're not timing your child's masturbation sessions you are a bad parent.

    Replies: @Angharad, @24th Alabama, @Same old same old

    Did they notice you putting the liver back in the fridge,
    or did they taste all about it?

  • Is it correct to say that you have gone from a dedicated Antifa member to a convinced race realist? Yes, although I’m not sure the term “member” is the appropriate term. “Adherent” is a better term. From what age until what age were you active in Antifa, and what years were these? I participated in...
  • Uhhh Italian and English

    Curious same teaching and same academy, if so that would be interesting, other than that. You answer your own dilemma — attitudinal disposition. Different families, coaches, cities, countries, even different diets, training environmentsetc.

    Now I have no idea of your description of the players in the video is accurate. But what you claim it shws is certainly now what is shown. In fact, the ;ast part of th video highlights a player who in my view appears black. This is a tournament from a variety of youth teams from a avriety of different places.

    Your own description of the British team admits the players are not even on the same team — just because they may know each other — hardly classifies a group homogenized enough to draw the conclusions you suggest. In ga=fact noting yiu have said or what is displayed in the video names the case.

  • The recognizable ancestor of the IDF is not the Marquis De Sade, a mere sexual deviant, but your common serial killer with added pathological paraphilia, and the ability to industrialize the scale of his crimes. As I had remarked before, patterns of arousal—the commingling of serial killing and sex—are tied to psychopathy. The psychopathic fusion...
  • Not a single kike on Earth can be considered human. This satanic insect species must be wiped out of existence.

  • The United States is dusting off its old regime-change playbook in Venezuela. Although the slogan has shifted from “restoring democracy” to “fighting narco-terrorists,” the objective remains the same, which is control of Venezuela’s oil. The methods followed by the US are familiar: sanctions that strangle the economy, threats of force, and a $50 million bounty...
  • If Trump is owned by gangsters…if they own the mortgages on Trump’s facade of wealth then since Trump’s a “business man”… a “deal maker” then make a deal with Iran, Venezuela.

    “Bail me out with the gangsters,” Trump should say to Venezuela and Iran and “I’ll leave you alone.”

    If Trump does that then he has a free hand against the gangsters then.

    • Replies: @an humble craftsman
    @Mr-Chow-Mein

    These gangsters kill traitors

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes: Video and transcript Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes has gotten considerable coverage in the media, e.g., “Tucker Carlson discusses ‘these Zionist Jews’ with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes in The Times of Israel” and “Heritage Foundation president stands by Tucker Carlson after host platforms antisemitism” in the Jewish Telegraph Agency....
  • @JWalters
    The Tucker-Fuentes interview spawned many battles. In one typical such fight Laura Loomer indignantly, angrily argues that Cenk Uygur should have his citizenship revoked and be deported because he criticizes Israel (which she frantically calls "anti-Semitic").

    Indignation is an intentional tactic of professional con artists. They use it when they have no case, no facts, no logic. It is an act. It does not deserve to be taken seriously.

    Laura Loomer has no facts or logic to refute the criticisms of Israel. She has no evidence to back up her claims of "anti-Semitism". Her indignation, her hysterically talking over others, her flapping and flaming are all parts of an act. Because she has no case.

    And this is the way it is with Zionists in general. Zionism is a big scam. It has no defense in facts and logic. So it is "defended" with a fake accusation backed up with fake emotion. It's an old, old trick.

    The reality is that they want to silence all factual discussion about Israel. The reason is that Americans have been fed a gigantic lie about Israel, and they don't want that revealed. The dirty laundry is that Israel was established by Jewish criminals using terrible crimes. It was highly organized and financed by wealthy Jews, including the Rothschilds. And they pretend to have done this in the name of all Jews.

    Consequently, when people talk about this reality they often refer to "organized Jewry", or more casually to "Jews" or "the Jews". Since these terms easily devolve into terminology battles it would probably be best to use more precisely accurate terms.

    "Jewish criminals" would be appropriate.
    "Jewish bankers" would also be appropriate in certain instances (such as the Rothschild money behind Israel).
    "Jewish criminal bankers" would also be appropriate.
    "Jewish billionaires" and
    "Jewish big money" would also be accurate. As would
    "criminal Jewish big money".

    These phrases do not implicate all Jews, such as those who are prominent in the fight against the Jewish criminals.

    The clear reality is that in addition to big Jewish money behind the establishment of Israel, there is big Jewish money trying hard to control the public discussion about Israel. This discussion has been completely shut down in the corporate media, and there is a large, highly financed effort to similarly censor it on the internet.

    And the mere fact that most members of Congress have supported Israel's OBVIOUS genocide in Gaza makes it clear these members are tightly controlled by Israeli interests. There is simply no other plausible explanation. And that is on top of Israel's decades of ethnic cleansing, involving mass murder and mass property theft. By now most people know this control is by bribery (aka campaign "donations") and blackmail.

    The evidence is overwhelming, and becoming increasingly public, that Israel is America's most dangerous enemy. Disguised as an ally, it has infiltrated our central nervous system.

    It's also the case that these Jewish mobsters (though well-dressed) have other major crimes they want to keep covered up. The evidence points to 9/11, the JFK assassination, and the Fed looting operation, among others. The Fed is explained in the first two sections of
    War Profiteers and Israel's Bank
    https://warprofiteerstory.blogspot.com/p/war-profiteers-and-israels-bank.html

    So they're not just trying to silence a conversation about their genocide, or why Americans send $4 billion each year to Israel. There's a much bigger conversation they're desperate to derail. They make the City of London and Wall Street an epicenter of evil. Their criminal network must be eradicated, and legal protections put in place to prevent such a takeover of the US society in the future.

    These vicious criminals are the type of people who give Jews a bad name.

    Replies: @Jackabond

    These vicious criminals are the type of people who give Jews a bad name.

    Mr Walters, great respect for your superior insights in these comment sections – they’re always a joy and an education to behold.

    Just one push back with this comment. Jews have always had a bad name, given to them by God himself: meshubah, meaning apostate, or turned away.

    Judaism is a perversion of the Old Testament, a clear departure from the ways of Moses. Judaism did not arise as a clean break from the Old Testament, as if you could go back and pin down a specific time and place when the Israelis got lost. Rather, it is the net result of trends that have always been a part of who they were, and their tendency to wander from God’s Word.

    Judaism is the net result of Israel’s fleshly nature, their peculiar moral flaws as a nation, perverting divine revelation. Throughout the history of Israel, we can see how the best and most faithful kept trying to pull them back on track, but the truth is that they were never really there. The bulk of the nation was never faithful without a very active sword keeping them in line. Their foul nature was never far from the surface.

    Those vicious criminals you perfectly describe are in fact true to their Jewish nature.

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Achmed E. Newman
    I don't know how far this unspellable foreign Moslem Commie will really get with his programmes in NYC, but this kind of thing only hits home when you come home. Watch this scene, and see what I mean, say in my post Bolshevik Zohran Kwame Mamdani on seizing the means of habitation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5ikX1e7TrQ

    You've got to go to the post for Lara's Theme.

    .
    We've got a lot of artiste/literati types here, so I hope many of you will know the reference, having watched or even read Dr. Zhivago.

    Replies: @Currdog73, @Buzz Mohawk, @Mr. Anon, @Pericles

    “Seizing the means of habitation”!

    I like it. The new People’s Republic of New York City is going to give us lots of examples of means-seizing.

    Public supermarkets: Seizing the means of victualization.

    Revocation of public decency laws: Seizing the means of defecation.

    Public day-care: ????????????

    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Mr. Anon


    Public day-care: ????????????
     
    On the principle of "the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world" let's just call it 'Seizing power'.
  • The recognizable ancestor of the IDF is not the Marquis De Sade, a mere sexual deviant, but your common serial killer with added pathological paraphilia, and the ability to industrialize the scale of his crimes. As I had remarked before, patterns of arousal—the commingling of serial killing and sex—are tied to psychopathy. The psychopathic fusion...
  • Many Jews boast with ‘pride’ that Israel is the ‘gayest country in the world’.

    They’re right.

    The whole Jewish Power trip has turned into taking pride in f***ing the World in the arse.

    • Replies: @alexander
    @Priss Factor

    It is all so disgusting !

    It is soooo disgusting !

  • During the early 1990s Germar Rudolf was a young chemist employed at Germany's prestigious Max Planck Institute with a bright future ahead of him. But then he was hired to conduct a chemical analysis of the walls of the Auschwitz concentration camp. One thing led to another and he spent the next thirty-odd years suffering...
  • @notanonymoushere
    @Ron Unz


    So unless he was flat-out lying, copies of Icebreaker were indeed being bought and sold on the Internet for “upward of $500.”
     
    Yes he was flat-out lying, or you're misrepresenting what he said, I don't care. There should be throngs of people who paid $500 for a non-collectible book ready to sing your praises and back up your ridiculous claim. Language, melonfarmer.

    You picked a really weird hill to die on: the price on a book purchase that never happened. I'm not your Mistress Heather, I'm not your dom. Seek that elsewhere. Simply pointing out nonsense with very nice language, now don't y0u look pretty?

    Replies: @Ron Unz

    Yes he was flat-out lying, or you’re misrepresenting what he said, I don’t care. There should be throngs of people who paid $500 for a non-collectible book ready to sing your praises and back up your ridiculous claim. Language, melonfarmer.

    You’re a totally ranting lunatic. I’m explicitly quoting what he wrote in his 2010 article that I’d linked in my own 2018 article, which you’ve obviously still never bothered reading. Here’s the PDF:

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Chronicles-2010apr-Navrozov.pdf

    Unless I’m mistaken, you’d never heard of Icebreaker, its unusual publication history, nor the momentous historical events it presents.

    Yet you are absolutely, positively certain that the reviewer for The Times of London is flat-out lying when he claimed that copies of that extremely rare book were sometimes bought for more than $500 during the 17 years after its publication.

    Our website attracts all sorts of eccentric or deranged individuals, including those whose ignorance is only matched by their arrogance.

    I assume you’ll now respond with a further wave of crude insults and invective to mask your embarrassing humiliation.

    I’m really not at all sure that this website is suitable for someone like you.

  • Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link Jason Farago, who appears to be a Deep State propagandist and pro-UkroNazi culture warrior, just published a New York Times interactive photo-video piece headlined “How Lunar Photography Brought the Heavens Down to Earth.” Farago celebrates the alleged artistic genius of the Apollo moon photos, viewing them...
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @Felpudinho

    Felpu-dildo writes:


    The funniest line from Rurik’s comment to you was when he fluffed himself by claiming to be The Unz Review’s self-appointed gatekeeper of truth and justice
     
    I've had countless exchanges with Rurik over the years and read many hundreds (perhaps a thousands or more?) of his comments.
    And if Ron Unz ever appointed someone to be the gatekeeper of truth and justice, I can think of few (if any), that would be more suitable.

    Rurik has demonstrated on countless occasions that he's a true American patriot, someone who invests his valuable time sharing his wisdom in this webzine, in making his country a better place and fearlessly exposing ZOG's malfeasance.
    Contrast that to someone like you Felpo-dindo, seeing as you've been observed on numerous occasions acting in the capacity of apologist for Malignant International Jewry.

    I too do what I can to educate the UR readership at every opportunity, to the REASONS why the cartel of Jewish financiers that control the entirety of the western financial and political system are so powerful.
    And for that reason, I'm often found commenting in those UR articles relating to financial matters.

    I, like Dr Ron Paul, advocate for an End to the Fed.
    You see, possession of the U.S Federal Reserve (thus control of the U.S Money Supply and issuance thereof), is the core foundation of ZOG's power.

    So confiscation of The Fed from the Talmudic misfits is Priority One if Americans are ever going to be unshackled from indentured servitude to their Jewish overlords.
    Deprived of the ability to conjure scores of trillions with a tap on their keyboards (trillions which they routinely dole out to themselves or their Jewish cronies), ZOG will soon enough wither on the vine.

    So, before you start mocking others for being 'gatekeepers', first ask yourself WHO (based exclusively on altruistic motives), is volunteering to undertake that task - or at least making their contribution to that COLLECTIVE EFFORT in this webzine?

    In other words, there is no single individual that is the 'gatekeeper' - and Rurik would be the first to acknowledge that.

    There are many hundreds (and more likely thousands) of such individuals participating in UR that challenge and regularly eviscerate the liars, the sayanim, the members of the (((tribe))) that come to this webzine to muddy the waters and defect attention from Jewish orchestration of these most egregious of crimes/hoaxes.

    (eg: 9/11 False Flag, murder of JFK/RFK/JFK Jr, orchestration of WWI & II, the Covid Psyop and the Mass Cull of Humanity from the toxic clot shots, the Ukraine proxy war, the truth about ZOG orchestration of Charlie Kirk's murder, and much more).
     
    If it's someone of Rurik's calibre - an exceedingly knowledgeable and unscrupulously honest individual - then it's a no brainer. We should be all for it.

    Meanwhile, if it's someone of your lowly calibre, then obviously it's a suggestion deserving of ridicule.

    Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not), @Rurik, @Felpudinho

    “I’ve had countless exchanges with Rurik over the years and read many hundreds (perhaps a thousands or more?) of his comments.
    And if Ron Unz ever appointed someone to be the gatekeeper of truth and justice, I can think of few (if any), that would be more suitable.”

    You got rocks in your head.

    Rurik has demonstrated on countless occasions that he’s a true American patriot, someone who invests his valuable time sharing his wisdom…

    Contrast that to someone like you Felpo-dindo, seeing as you’ve been observed on numerous occasions acting in the capacity of apologist for Malignant International Jewry.

    Then reality came knocking.

    Remember: Just because you think something is true doesn’t mean that it is.

    Rurik’s big whine with me is that I consider the “Palestinians” (in their own violent, deadbeat, welfare-for-life Muslim way) to be just as shitty as the Jews, while he sees them as little innocent angels on earth. I want neither of them getting my tax dollars nor living in the US of A.

    • Replies: @24th Alabama
    @Felpudinho

    The Palestinians should be more kind and peaceful, but assume that someone burned
    down your house, stole your land and murdered your family. Since you are a superior
    moral person, I'm sure that you would be able to look past those unfortunate events.
    You would forgive the Jews and embrace them as brethren.

    Sadly, the Palestinians were human, all too human, and they wanted revenge and their
    land returned. But, can the Jews be blamed since they were taught that all Gentiles
    were a lesser breed, intended only to serve them? Can an individual be held to account
    for the insanity of his Tribe? Apparently so, since it happens every day.

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes: Video and transcript Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes has gotten considerable coverage in the media, e.g., “Tucker Carlson discusses ‘these Zionist Jews’ with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes in The Times of Israel” and “Heritage Foundation president stands by Tucker Carlson after host platforms antisemitism” in the Jewish Telegraph Agency....
  • @JPS
    Why did the Americans drop the bomb on Nagasaki so soon? Why not wait a bit?

    It was because THEY WERE AFRAID THE JAPANESE WOULD SURRENDER BEFORE THEY COULD USE THE SECOND ONE.

    We're supposed to believe they were trying to intimidate the Soviets, when the cabinet meetings were full of advocates for sharing nuclear technology with the Soviets. The same way the United States government later consented to the Israeli Jews stealing enriched Uranium and other bomb components.

    The atom was dropped because they wanted to kill all those people. That was the primary motivation. Never forget it.

    Ritual murder? You think there's a better explanation? A better explanation for 9/11?

    Replies: @BrooLidd, @Getaclue, @anarchyst, @svs, @JM

    Why did the Americans drop the bomb on Nagasaki so soon? Why not wait a bit?

    It was because THEY WERE AFRAID THE JAPANESE WOULD SURRENDER BEFORE THEY COULD USE THE SECOND ONE.

    We’re supposed to believe they were trying to intimidate the Soviets, when the cabinet meetings were full of advocates for sharing nuclear technology with the Soviets. The same way the United States government later consented to the Israeli Jews stealing enriched Uranium and other bomb components.

    The atom was dropped because they wanted to kill all those people. That was the primary motivation. Never forget it.

    This is both original and tenable/debatable as is this immediately below.

    Ritual murder? You think there’s a better explanation?

    But this is nonsense…

    A better explanation for 9/11?

    because its aim was to create the modern era of destroying American sovereignty as part of setting the groundwork for other Zionist geopolitical aims. Your theory replaces real world politics with religious speculation, obliterating the former.

  • Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link Jason Farago, who appears to be a Deep State propagandist and pro-UkroNazi culture warrior, just published a New York Times interactive photo-video piece headlined “How Lunar Photography Brought the Heavens Down to Earth.” Farago celebrates the alleged artistic genius of the Apollo moon photos, viewing them...
  • @Sparkon
    @roonaldo


    Starlight is very faint and the daylight surface of the moon very bright.
     
    No. the daylight surface of the Moon is not very bright at all, but in fact is rather dark. The average albedo of the surface of the Moon is about 0.12, meaning it reflects only about 12% of the sunlight hitting it, about the same as dark asphalt.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon, @xcd

    No. the daylight surface of the Moon is not very bright at all, but in fact is rather dark. The average albedo of the surface of the Moon is about 0.12, meaning it reflects only about 12% of the sunlight hitting it, about the same as dark asphalt.

    That’s true. The lunar surface is not highly reflective. But it is reflective enough, and the Sun so bright, that any camera adjusted to produce a clear non-washed-out image of Lunar features isn’t going to register any stars.

    And the Sun is pretty bright. The Moon at night looks “bright” – bright white – because sunlight is quite intense by our standards of nighttime illumination. When you look at the Moon with the naked eye, you don’t see any stars around it, but obviously they are there.

    I can’t believe people are still making – and falling for – this argument (I’m not saying that you did).

    • Replies: @roonaldo
    @Mr. Anon

    Mr. Anon, Sparkon. Gentlemen, thanks for the heads-up on the albedo of the moon. I recall the albedo of Venus is about 0.75 and Earth about, what, 0.31?

    My thinking was in reference to astronauts photographing the lunar surface and stopping-up considerably for shooting terrain, being "bright" in that regard, with no plant life and little shadow from terrain.

    The top surface of the astronauts' Hasselbads had a simplified diagram for f-stops for a few conditions. The cameras were modified to give them, I think, three f-stops(?). I vaguely recall a setting of 5.6 for objects in shadow. I'll be interested to see what the diagram showed. And to find the answer to a question arising in my noggin'--what would be Earth's average albedo were there no clouds? Thanks for nudging the ol' curiosity meter!

  • Have you ever noticed how whenever you see someone promoting hatred toward Muslims, nine times out of ten it will be someone who supports Israel? There’s a reason for that. Zionists promote Islamophobia because convincing westerners to hate Muslims is easier than convincing them to love Israel. Support for Israel is a hard sell. On...
  • @kiwk
    @muh muh

    Pffft.

    My 'fear' is due to reality.

    Muslims are an existential threat to christians ( or all other religions, too, for that matter). Who is slaughtering christians in the east? Who is burning up christian churches in the east? Who exploded that historical buddhist statue because the muslims couldn't handle a different religion? Who exterminated the Kurds? The barbary pirates were largely muslim. from AI Barbary pirates attacked areas throughout the Mediterranean Sea and along the Atlantic coast, raiding ships and coastal towns from North Africa to Iceland and the British Isles. Their raids reached as far as the Atlantic, including the coasts of Ireland and western England, and even extended to South America, with their primary targets being coastal European settlements and shipping lanes in the Mediterranean. (not withstanding the fact that yes, some areas within muslim countries did tolerate other religions).

    Before Muslim conquest, Turkey was primarily christian. From AI the conversion of Anatolia from a predominantly Christian land began with the Seljuk Turkic conquests, a process that unfolded over centuries. The process accelerated after the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople in 1453. Factors contributing to the Christian population's decline includedFrom AI: The Byzantine empire was defeated by the muslims. Warfare and demographic changes: Protracted warfare and nomadic migrations devastated many Christian settlements and led to demographic shifts. Islamization: Though not an official policy of forced conversion, various factors such as the lower social status of Christians, discriminatory laws, and the special jizya tax incentivized conversion to Islam. Late Ottoman genocides and population exchanges: The most dramatic reduction in the Christian population occurred during the early 20th century. Events like the Armenian, Greek, and Assyrian genocides, as well as the 1923 population exchange with Greece, dramatically reduced the number of Christians in Turkey.

    Muslims regularly raided european countries and enslaved slavs.

    More from AI:

    Muslim conquests included vast territories across the Middle East, North Africa, and parts of Asia and Europe. Notable conquered areas include modern-day Syria, Palestine, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, and Spain, which were taken from the Byzantine and Persian empires, as well as lands in Central Asia and the Indian subcontinent.
    Middle East and North Africa
    Levant: The Rashidun Caliphate conquered the Byzantine provinces of Syria and Palestine, with Jerusalem surrendering in 638.
    Egypt: Conquered from the Byzantine Empire, with Alexandria falling in 641.
    Persia: The entire Sasanian Empire was conquered, a region that includes modern-day Iraq and Iran.
    North Africa: Muslim armies moved into North Africa, conquering regions that are now part of modern-day Libya and Tunisia and eventually reaching the Maghreb.
    Asia and Europe
    Spain: The Umayyad conquest of Hispania began in 711.
    Central Asia: Areas like Transoxiana and parts of Afghanistan and Sindh (in present-day Pakistan) were conquered, notes Wikipedia.
    Indian Subcontinent: Muslim forces conducted conquests in regions of the Indian subcontinent, including Sindh.
    Caucasus and Eastern Europe: Territories such as Armenia and Azerbaijan were conquered, and eventually, some areas in Europe were also subject to Muslim rule, such as parts of Italy and the Balkans.


    It is true that when christians dominated the area, there were more peaceful relations. So, who started it? It certainly sounds like the muslims started the entire conflict by conquering christians, who fought them back in the more western areas of europe.

    Such an incredibly peaceful bunch of people. In Dearborn, the muslim mayor said he would have a parade if a critical white christian guy left the city. Mandami in New York is already addressing muslims repeatedly, as if no other new yorkers exist. It is the language of conquest.

    As to blacks, they commit some 40+ % of all crimes in the US. Same for other countries in which blacks can't assimilate. They are unproductive, overly represented for government benes, and have been unable to provide for their people in the african countries even with billions of subsidies. They favor blacks in all situations, such as criminal justice, employment, etc. In Africa, they kill of the white farmers and can't even maintain what they take over.

    These people are incapable of being western; they simply do not have the heritage that would enable them to assimilate and they are far too tribal to ever comprehend the west. If and when they conquer the western countries, they will do what they always have done in the past. Enslave anyone they can get a hand on and war with anyone they disagree with, just like they do now.

    And history didn't start in the 1600s.

    Replies: @Tigerlily, @muh muh

    My ‘fear’ is due to reality.

    No, your fear is irrational, and your response, comprised of manically discursive and occasionally vague references to cherry-picked events, leapfrogging centuries over the timeline and continents over the map, underscores the weakness of your position.

    If Muslims were an existential threat to Christians, they would have wiped them out entirely, along with every trace of their religion, beginning in the 7th century CE when they had both the means and opportunity to do so.

    You clearly haven’t traveled to the Muslim world to see how many ancient churches predating Islam are still in use by Christians. This fact alone completely demolishes your assertion.

    The Bamiyan statue demolition wasn’t undertaken because Muslims ‘couldn’t handle another religion’. If the reason concerned Islam’s prohibition on statuary art, they would have destroyed those statues when the opportunity to do so arose three years prior. As Mullah Omar explained:

    I did not want to destroy the Bamiyan Buddha. In fact, some foreigners came to me and said they would like to conduct the repair work of the Bamiyan Buddha that had been slightly damaged due to rains. This shocked me. I thought, these callous people have no regard for thousands of living human beings—the Afghans who are dying of hunger, but they are so concerned about non-living objects like the Buddha. This was extremely deplorable. That is why I ordered its destruction. Had they come for humanitarian work, I would have never ordered the Buddha’s destruction.

    https://www.rediff.com/news/2004/apr/12inter.htm

    Also, the vast majority of Kurds are Muslim and they’re hardly ‘exterminated’. lol

    It’s amusing that you have go as far back as the Barbary Wars to make your case. FWIW, Christian pirates and privateers were also very active in the Mediterranean at that time, so the capture of American vessels by Muslim corsairs was fairly customary for the time and place where it occurred. Of course, when you have a cartoonish view of history where you whitewash the reality of Christian participation in similar conduct, it’s hardly surprising that you arrive at the delusions you entertain.

    This statement, for example, takes the proverbial cake:

    It is true that when christians dominated the area, there were more peaceful relations.

    Seems you know next to nothing about the spread of Christianity and how it compelled subject populations to submit or perish at the edge of the sword. Do some homework on the Theodosian Code for starters and get back to us with what you’ve learned.

    Contrarily, Muslim conquerors never demanded conversion to Islam from their subject populations. You can also do some homework on that topic and get back to us. Seems like a pretty important difference, don’t you think?

    Mamdani is a dyed-in-the-wool leftist, not a Muslim radical. Every time I see people like you freak out about him, I have to laugh. You think he wants shari’ah in NYC? lol Lord, you guys are credulous.

    And history didn’t start in the 1600s.

    No kidding?

    Why are you so ignorant of it, then?

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes: Video and transcript Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes has gotten considerable coverage in the media, e.g., “Tucker Carlson discusses ‘these Zionist Jews’ with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes in The Times of Israel” and “Heritage Foundation president stands by Tucker Carlson after host platforms antisemitism” in the Jewish Telegraph Agency....
  • @JPS
    Why did the Americans drop the bomb on Nagasaki so soon? Why not wait a bit?

    It was because THEY WERE AFRAID THE JAPANESE WOULD SURRENDER BEFORE THEY COULD USE THE SECOND ONE.

    We're supposed to believe they were trying to intimidate the Soviets, when the cabinet meetings were full of advocates for sharing nuclear technology with the Soviets. The same way the United States government later consented to the Israeli Jews stealing enriched Uranium and other bomb components.

    The atom was dropped because they wanted to kill all those people. That was the primary motivation. Never forget it.

    Ritual murder? You think there's a better explanation? A better explanation for 9/11?

    Replies: @BrooLidd, @Getaclue, @anarchyst, @svs, @JM

    Americans still pretend to not know that the USA dropped its nukes in Japan to :
    -test which is more efficient in killing civilians : the uranium-235 bomb dropped on Hiroshima or the plutonium-239 bomb dropped on Nagasaki ?
    The uranium was more lethal and the US decided to go with uranium.
    -the obtain some leverage against USSR ( that did not have nukes then ) because USSR had won WW II and the USA wanted an advantageous peace deal. This is how the USA was able to claim victory in WW II.
    Never forget that the war was won by USSR, the Red Army defeated 80 % of elite Wehrmacht and the Americans entered the war late, when it was almost over, June 6 1944, after waiting almost 5 years to see which country is destroyed, Germany or USSR.
    The Red Army was about to start the war against Japan and the Americans did not to see Japan defeated and occupied by USSR, so they dropped the bombs a few days earlier.
    Americans pretend even now that there was no other option and they would do it again today, if needed.

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Hypnotoad666
    @James B. Shearer


    NIST’s recommendations have had a significant impact on design and construction practices for high-rise buildings worldwide, including the new buildings at the rebuilt World Trade Center site.”
     
    This is a weasel-worded NIST propaganda press release that means nothing. Of course fire is generally a bad thing and should be avoided. The press release claims NIST had some general anti-fire recommendations and asserts that maybe someone was influenced by those recommendations. So what? Even if true (and no specific citation or evidence is given to believe it, anyway), that has nothing to do with any supposed acceptance of the premise that burning papers, drapes and carpets can implode a steel-framed skyscraper.

    This lame government propaganda illustrates another problem -- Google is rigged to feed people propaganda. I'm sure you Googled something about "WTC collapse" or "NIST" and Google fed you this crap, plus a cite to Wokepedia.

    But if you or anyone else is interested in understanding and evaluating the actual case for the controlled demolition hypothesis in good faith, you can start by reading this report: "15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses:'
    https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf

    If the Truth-Deniers on this thread (like Mr. Anon, Intelligent Daesan, Kagonovich, Mark G, etc.) can first understand the case, but still decide that "it's all Lies! I trust the Government!" Then so be it. At least their conclusion would then be semi-informed instead of emotional and faith-based.

    Here's a short synopsis of the issues regarding WTC 7:


    The case of WTC 7
    The total collapse of WTC 7 at 5: 20 PM on 9/1 1 , shown in Fig. 2, is remarkable because it exemplified all the sig-nature features of an implosion: The building dropped in absolute free fall for the first 2. 25 seconds of its descent over a distance of 32 meters or eight stories [ 3] . Its transition from stasis to free fall was sudden, occurring in approximately one- half second. It fell symmetrically straight down. Its steel frame was almost entirely dismembered and deposited mostly inside the building's footprint, while most of its concrete was pulverized into tiny particles. Finally, the collapse was rapid, occurring in less than seven seconds.

    Given the nature of the collapse, any investigation adhering to the scientific method should have seriously considered the controlled demolition hypothesis, if not started with it. Instead, NIST ( as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency ( FEMA) , which conducted a preliminary study prior to the NIST investigation) began with the predetermined conclusion that the collapse was caused by fires.

    Trying to prove this predetermined conclusion was apparently difficult. FEMA's nine- month study concluded by saying, " The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence." NIST, meanwhile, had to postpone the release of its WTC 7 report from mid- 2005 to November 2008. As late as March 2006, NIST's lead investigator, Dr. Shyam Sunder, was quoted as saying, " Truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7."

    All the while, NIST was steadfast in ignoring evidence that conflicted with its predetermined conclusion.

    WTC 7 underwent free fall. When pressed about that matter during a technical briefing, Dr. Sunder dismissed it by saying, "[ A] free- fall time would be an object that has no structural components below it." But in the case of WTC 7, he claimed, "there was structural resistance that was provided." Only after being challenged by high school physics teacher David Chandler and by physics professor Steven Jones ( one of the authors of this article) , who had measured the fall on video, did NIST acknowledge a 2. 25- second period of free fall in its final report. Yet NIST's computer model shows no such period of free fall, nor did NIST attempt to explain how WTC 7 could have had "no structural components below it" for eight stories.

    Instead, NIST's final report provides an elaborate scenario involving an unprecedented failure mechanism: the thermal expansion of floor beams pushing an adjoin- ing girder off its seat. The alleged walk- off of this girder then supposedly caused an eight- floor cascade of floor failures, which, combined with the failure of two other girder connections-also due to thermal expansion-left a key column unsupported over nine stories, causing it to buckle. This single column failure allegedly precipitated the collapse of the entire interior structure, leaving the exterior unsupported as a hollow shell. The exterior columns then allegedly buckled over a two- second period and the entire exterior fell simultaneously as a unit [ 3] .

    NIST was able to arrive at this scenario only by omit- ting or misrepresenting critical structural features in its computer modelling. [ 4] Correcting just one of these errors renders NIST's collapse initiation indisputably impossible. Yet even with errors that were favorable to its predetermined conclusion, NIST's computer model ( see Fig. 3) fails to replicate the observed collapse, instead showing large deformations to the exterior that are not observed in the videos and showing no period of free fall. Also, the model terminates, without explanation, less than two seconds into the seven- second collapse. Unfortunately, NIST's computer modelling cannot be independently verified because NIST has refused to re- lease a large portion of its modelling data on the basis
    that doing so "might jeopardize public safety."
     

    * * *

    Other Evidence Unexplained
    Collapse mechanics discussed above are only a fraction of the available evidence indicating that the airplane impacts and ensuing fires did not cause the collapse of the Twin Towers. Videos show that the upper section of each tower disintegrated within the first four seconds of collapse. After that point, not a single video shows the up- per sections that purportedly descended all the way to the ground before being crushed. Videos and photographs also show numerous high-velocity bursts of debris being ejected from point- like sources ( see Fig. 5) . NIST refers to these as "puffs of smoke" but fails to properly analyze them [6] . NIST also provides no explanation for the midair pulverization of most of the towers' concrete, the near-total dismemberment of their steel frames, or the ejection of those materials up to 150 meters in all directions.

    NIST sidesteps the well- documented presence of molten metal throughout the debris field and asserts that the orange molten metal seen pouring out of WTC 2 for the seven minutes before its collapse was aluminum from the aircraft combined with organic materials ( see Fig. 6) D 6] . Yet experiments have shown that molten aluminum, even when mixed with organic materials, has a silvery appearance-thus suggesting that the orange molten metal was instead emanating from a thermite reaction being used to weaken the structure D 1 2] . Meanwhile, unreacted nano- thermitic material has since been discovered in multiple independent WTC dust samples [13].

    As for eye witness accounts some 56 witnesses including 35 first responders have been documented as saying that they saw, heard and/or felt explosions prior to and/or during the collapses [4] . That the Twin Towers were brought down with explosives appears to have been the initial prevailing view among most first responders . "I thought it was exploding, actually," said John Coyle, a fire marshals "Everyone I think at that point still thought these things were blown up." [15]

     

    Replies: @Corvinus, @Mr. Anon

    This lame government propaganda illustrates another problem — Google is rigged to feed people propaganda. I’m sure you Googled something about “WTC collapse” or “NIST” and Google fed you this crap, plus a cite to Wokepedia.

    You seem to be sure of a lot of things that are not true. How do you know that all we have done is looked in Wikipedia. I’ve been looking at “Truther” stuff for 20 years – reading THEIR stuff on THEIR websites, and none of it persuaded me.

    But if you or anyone else is interested in understanding and evaluating the actual case for the controlled demolition hypothesis in good faith, you can start by reading this report: “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses:’
    https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf

    And are you willing to acknowledge the contingent reality of the collapse of the 20 story Plasco building in Tehran in 2017, due to fire? Or the collapse of a 25 story building in Sao Paulo in 2018, again due to fire?

    And the claim that what happened in WTC1 and 2 were “office fires” is disingenuous twaddle. Those fires weren’t caused by popcorn left in a microwave. They were caused by a huge swath of the building being instantly ignited with the aid of an accelerant (jet fuel – lots of it). The fires may have been made still worse by burning aluminum (from the shredded airframe of the planes). And these firest raged unsupressed, as the sprinkler system didn’t work. The fires in WTC 7 could hardly be characterized as just “office fires” either as they raged unbattled all day.

    Moreover, at least for WTC 1 and 2, it wasn’t just a fire; Both WTC1 and 2 sustained massive structural damage from the impacts, with large numbers of structural members on one side being severed.

    Another thing you guys who think that fires can’t bring down steel buildings never answer: If fires can’t bring down a building, then why did they coat the steel structural members with fire protection? Isn’t that just an extravagant expense – to coat all the steel beams in the WTC with spray-on asbestos fire retardant – if it is so obviously unnecessary? Why did they do it?

    If the Truth-Deniers on this thread (like Mr. Anon, Intelligent Daesan, Kagonovich, Mark G, etc.) can first understand the case, but still decide that “it’s all Lies! I trust the Government!” Then so be it. At least their conclusion would then be semi-informed instead of emotional and faith-based.

    Truth-Deniers. Yes, we deny truth. Only people like you defend truth. You are the elect.

    For a defender of The Truth, you sure lie a lot. Where have I said that I trust the Government? Where have I said that I don’t believe that the Government (some Government) had nothing to do with the attacks on 9/11?

    Trutherism, as it hs developed, seems to have become a mental strait-jacket for most of its adherents. And it has proven to be a collossal failure. You don’t even hear about in public fora anymore (you used to, ca. 2004 or so). I think that so-called Truthers have so poisoned the well of public opinion that they have rendered it virtually impossible, certainly very difficult, for there ever to be a real, substantive, and independent investigation about what really happened on 9/11.

    Mission Accomplished!

    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Mr. Anon


    I think that so-called Truthers have so poisoned the well of public opinion that they have rendered it virtually impossible, certainly very difficult, for there ever to be a real, substantive, and independent investigation about what really happened on 9/11.

    Mission Accomplished!
     
    Talk about turning the tables! Hypnotoad is Mossad! Well done.
    , @Hypnotoad666
    @Mr. Anon


    How do you know that all we have done is looked in Wikipedia
     
    I was replying to another poster about a different document he pulled off the internet. This has nothing to do with whatever you have done, or not done.

    I’ve been looking at “Truther” stuff for 20 years – reading THEIR stuff on THEIR websites, and none of it persuaded me.
     
    Fine. I don't give a shit. I posted about three particular points with citations. I don't need to know your opinion about whatever other things you've read on the Internet over the last 20 years. Maybe you visited sites that were full of crap. Don't know and don't care.

    And are you willing to acknowledge the contingent reality of the collapse of the 20 story Plasco building in Tehran in 2017, due to fire? Or the collapse of a 25 story building in Sao Paulo in 2018, again due to fire?
     
    I don't know about those. I think I once saw some very bad footage of the Tehran building fire. As I recall there was smoke everywhere and the building was creaking and groaning and coming apart in pieces. It didn't seem to resemble a free fall collapse at all. But my memory is hazy. You didn't give any link but I'll look up these incidents. To the extent the circumstances were actually similar to the WTC 7 collapse, that would tend to show that a collapse from an office fire is theoretically possible. So you could theoretically have made a point if that ends up being true.

    For a defender of The Truth, you sure lie a lot. Where have I said that I trust the Government? Where have I said that I don’t believe that the Government (some Government) had nothing to do with the attacks on 9/11?
     
    You said about a million times that "Truthers" and "Trutherism" are false. It's your term which you don't define. But it is normally referring to the people and the movement that claims that the government version of 9-11 is not the truth. If you are against "Trutherism" then you must be saying that the government is telling the truth -- i.e., you trust that it was 19 jihadists acting on their own with no involvement by the CIA, Mossad, etc.

    so-called Truthers have so poisoned the well of public opinion that they have rendered it virtually impossible, certainly very difficult, for there ever to be a real, substantive, and independent investigation about what really happened on 9/11.
     
    What have they done to "poison the well?" I have no idea what you are talking about. All I see are engineers and architects making solid scientific points. You call these people "nitwits" but you either can't or won't articulate a single specific thing that any of them is objectively wrong about.

    I am sure there are lots of flakey people with flakey ideas out there somewhere. But I'm not concerned with them.

    In any event, if the "Truthers" are wrong to doubt the official narrative, then what part of the official narrative would still need to be investigated anyway? Just read the Congressional 9-11 Report and it will tell you exactly what happened. Right?

    Are you saying that you think the government is lying? If so, doesn't that make you a "Truther"? What's the difference between a good "Truther" like you, and bad "Truthers" like all the scientists and researchers you are shitting on in your comments? Your positions are honestly confusing.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

  • What would you say if I told you that if there is even a 1% chance that Dick Cheney didn’t really die, we must consider his non-death a 100% certainly, track down his undead corpse, pound his heart full of stakes, and shoot him full of silver bullets? Anyone who actually carried out that plan...
  • @Niebelheim
    There were 125 people killed in the Pentagon because Dick Cheney himself refused to order the SAM batteries ready to defend DC to knock down the flying object referred to as American Airlines Flight 77. The crash of that object into the Pentagon occurred at 9:37 AM, more than 45 minutes after North Tower had been hit and 30 after the South Tower. So there was no mistaking what the intent was for "Flight 77," which left Dulles around 820 and did an about face and came roaring back in the DC metroplex at 550 mph. Yet Cheney was rewarded with at least a decade of extra life with an organ transplant?

    Replies: @Kingsmeg

    There were 125 people killed in the Pentagon because Dick Cheney himself refused to order (…). Yet Cheney was rewarded with at least a decade of extra life with an organ transplant?

    Those 2 things might not be unrelated.

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes: Video and transcript Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes has gotten considerable coverage in the media, e.g., “Tucker Carlson discusses ‘these Zionist Jews’ with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes in The Times of Israel” and “Heritage Foundation president stands by Tucker Carlson after host platforms antisemitism” in the Jewish Telegraph Agency....
  • “Move To Israel” – The Daily Wire’s Former It Girl Brett Cooper Unloads



    Video Link

  • During the early 1990s Germar Rudolf was a young chemist employed at Germany's prestigious Max Planck Institute with a bright future ahead of him. But then he was hired to conduct a chemical analysis of the walls of the Auschwitz concentration camp. One thing led to another and he spent the next thirty-odd years suffering...
  • @L.K
    @Ron Unz

    Unz


    Irving and others have demonstrated that there’s no evidence that Hitler discovered that the Soviets were about to attack and quickly launched Barbarossa to forestall that.
     
    This is factually false. Hitler had indeed figured out that the Soviets were preparing to attack soon, and this was the result of many things, Soviet military operations in the German rear, worsening of the relationship, detection of a very possible new Soviet-Anglo-American encirclement, and also, fundamentally, the FACT that German intel began identifying over the months, increasingly massive disguised deployments of Red Army troops towards the Soviet western frontiers, construction of many military airfields and war material/munition depots in general, all very close to the borders and poised to support a large offensive operation. This is known from German documents captured in large numbers at the end of the war and most such intel documentation has been available for decades to interested historians. Needless to say most historians are NOT interested. What the German political and military leadership did not know was exactly when the Soviets would strike, that's true, but that is irrelevant to a preemptive war anyways, which is actually the only type of offensive warfare still admitted under current International Law, as preventive war is banned. Not that anybody cares, as one can see from the events of the last 25 years alone.
    BTW,currently, at least in Europe, it is increasingly no longer disputed that the Red Army was deployed in large numbers for an offensive against Germany. The trick now, besides just ignoring this evidence, is pretend that Germany's leadership never knew or learned of such Soviet military deployments and buildup.
    German military historian Dr. Bernd Schwipper writes in his follow up 2 volumes 'Die Aufklärung der Bedrohung aus dem Osten: Die Prävention durch die Wehrmacht 1939 bis 22. Juni 1941'(over 1100 pages of text and reproduced documents, graphs, etc)that,

    “established historiography is now trying to save its positions [in order to keep Germany as an unprovoked aggressor] with the absurd thesis” [the Wehrmacht attack of June 22, 1941 [could] not have been a preemptive strike, because the German side [did] not detect any [military]threat[from the Soviets].” ... 'The current threat from the East is supposed to have been fabricated. What a mistake! Let's simply examine the veracity of these claims and what the documents from the Wehrmacht's intelligence services and their actions in the lead-up to the German-Soviet War reveal.
     
    Here is a taste from anti-Germany German Court historians and others in Europe;
    The historian Jürgen Förster of the Bundeswehr Military History Research Office wrote :
    " At no point in the military planning did the German side imagine the threat of the Red Army" (summary in: Bianka Pietrow-Ennker: Preventive War? The German Attack on the Soviet Union, p. 211.)"

    Polish historian Bogdan Musial in 'Kampfplatz Deutschland" (p. 457):
    "Crucial to the whole debate, however, is the fact that the German side had absolutely no knowledge of the status of the Soviet armed forces, let alone of the status of the preparations for aggressive war(!!!!), which were running at full speed. Thus, there was no immediate reason for preventive war on the German side.”
    Good Lord! My comment to such claptrap is that one can easily imagine the constraints Court historians are subject to, and their bad faith and total lack of professional honour, to basically push the idea that the German military, at the time the best in the world, had not conducted any intelligence and reconnaissance of the potential enemy before deploying their forces and simply marched blindly eastwards! Such Court 'historians' are only able to do this by ignoring a mountain of German documents that have been available for decades!

    Several German historians have however, on the basis of such German intel documents, diaries ,etc, demonstrated the complete absurdity of such ridiculous claims. From this extensive documentation a picture emerges that the threat of offensive-minded Soviet deployments to a massive concentration of forces near the border had become very well known over the course of the many months preceeding Barbarossa. Even if the totality and full scale of the Soviet threat was only fully understood after the Germans preemptively attacked. From all this the German leadership finally drew the correct conclusion that a Soviet attack was imminent and opted to preempt it.
    The memorandum/declaration of war by the German government, delivered by von der Schulenburg to Molotow in the Kremlin on June 22, 1941, contained the following summary of the reasons that compelled these preemptive military actions by the Wehrmacht, and it is a pretty solid and truthful summary in my view:

    (rough translation)
    "In summary, the Reich government therefore declares that the Soviet government, contrary to the obligations it has undertaken, has:

    1. not only continued but intensified its attempts to undermine Germany and Europe;
    2. increasingly adopted a hostile foreign policy towards Germany;
    3. deployed its entire military force, ready to spring into action, on the German border. With this, the Soviet government has broken its treaties with Germany and is about to stab Germany in the back during its struggle for survival."
     
    Since the Soviet Union, despite its various aggressions, including against Poland, was not at war, while Germany, after slammed with a war declaration by the Western Powers, had been unable to bring the British Empire to negotiate a peace even after their defeat in 1940 and knew that the US administration was behind it all, just waiting for a chance to directly join the war. This cannot be emphasized enough; the US entry into WWI on the side of the Entente provoked the disastrous defeat for Germany with the subsequent crushingly punishing treaties that provoked all that followed.

    Replies: @Ron Unz

    Hitler had indeed figured out that the Soviets were preparing to attack soon…This is known from German documents captured in large numbers at the end of the war and most such intel documentation has been available for decades to interested historians. Needless to say most historians are NOT interested.

    Well, that’s certainly possible. But if so, why didn’t Irving’s very detailed Hitler book provide any indication of that based upon the documentary records he used? I read the Hitler book a couple of years after writing my Suvorov article and was struck by seeing absolutely no indication that Hitler had discovered the Soviets were about to attack at the time he struck.

    It’s certainly true that by the end of 1940, Hitler had become convinced that Stalin would attack at some point in the future and therefore began his own war preparations accordingly. But whether the Soviets might attack in 1941 or 1942 or even later wasn’t clear.

    Since the Schwipper book is in German, I can’t read it, and anyway its 1,100 pages of text and documents sounds far too specialized for me to evaluate.

    As for the official German statement at the time of the attack, I’d say it was mostly correct, but I’m not at all convinced the Germans had hard evidence to support it at the time they issued it.

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Hypnotoad666
    @Jenner Ickham Errican


    I haven’t seen anyone claim “Israel and the Deep State therefore dindu nuthin’.”
     
    Anyone who ignores facts because he believes "9/11 Trutherism" is automatically 'horseshit" is making exactly that claim. Maybe you didn't see their replies to me up the thread but Mr. Anon and Intelligent (sic) Daesin are making exactly such Grade-A level retard assertions.

    I didn't mean to necessarily paint you with the same brush. Your posts were merely annoying examples of Sealioning (a term which I learned on this thread about an hour ago).

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Anyone who ignores facts because he believes “9/11 Trutherism” is automatically ‘horseshit” is making exactly that claim.

    Your ardent ‘cause’ may be better served if you separate the physical destruction theories from the whodunnit / cui bono theories. You often conflate the two categories, which looks like your stated suspicions of ‘whodunnit’ necessarily rely on a theory that a “controlled demolition” happened, causing you to engage in confirmation bias to shore up your ‘whodunnit’ assertions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

    Here’s how you can convince the skeptics in two main steps, in a necessary sequence (i.e., step two will be moot if you can’t convince skeptics of the first part):

    First, concentrate solely on the covert physical destruction (i.e., disguised-method demolition) theory, citing evidence (using quotes) from non-crank sources. Once you’ve turned the ‘demolition’ skeptics to your side, then:

    Second, having convinced your skeptics that a covert demolition action occurred, concentrate solely on the whodunnit theory: Provide citations from non-crank sources that whoever covertly demolished the Twin Towers and/or WTC 7 had the operational ability to do so, and indeed had personnel in place at some point to plan, prep, and execute the sleight-of-hand operation. This would require providing names and ranks/titles of the actual operators who prepped the building(s), and were in the chain of command leading up to and on the day of the attack.

    If you’re not able to do any of the above, you’re gonna stay mad. 🙁

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Your comment is gay and retarded. Do you really think you are clever citing to the Wikipedia entry for "confirmation bias"? Lame.

    I'm not making any "whodunnit" theory assertions. In fact, my original post -- about 1,000 posts ago -- was making the precise point in response to Hail that one should ignore those issues and focus on the irrefutable physical evidence. But then I got Sealioned by a brigade of low-IQ Corvinis wannabes.


    This would require providing names and ranks/titles of the actual operators who prepped the building(s), and were in the chain of command leading up to and on the day of the attack.
     
    Yeah, I'll get you the names and numbers of each Mossad agent straightaway. What a stupid comment. Will no one rid me of these meddlesome Sealions?
  • @Buzz Mohawk
    @Achmed E. Newman

    "Sky High" is a great song. I also very much like the band Chicago, for example, "25 or 6 to 4."


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8A3HZvGN0qs&list=RD8A3HZvGN0qs&start_radio=1


    BTW, my implied criticism of Jimmy Buffett was only implied, and what I really was saying was that I don't know his work much other than "Margaritaville." (Then I remembered "Cheeseburger in Paradise," and I thought, well, maybe I'm not wrong...)

    Your example of his ex-pat song is very good, though. I must admit. Thanks.

    Replies: @Dmon

    I can take or leave most of Jimmy Buffet’s songs, but he definitely had the best song titles : “Weather’s Here, Wish You Were Beautiful”, “If The Phone Doesn’t Ring It’s Me”. And of course,

    Video Link

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Dmon

    “Weather’s Here, Wish You Were Beautiful” reasonably explains the “Get Drunk” conditional of the posted track. Right up there with “Her Face Had A Bilge Hole”.

  • @Dmon
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Mother Gaia continues to show her favor to The Human Beings by punishing those who would steal the bounty from her people and sell Buffalo fart products without paying royalties.

    https://www.thestreet.com/restaurants/creditsafe-flags-chapter-11-bankruptcy-risk-for-beyond-meat


    Analyst: Beyond Meat faces Chapter 11 bankruptcy as cash dwindles
     

    Replies: @epebble

    Mother Gaia continues to show her favor to The Human Beings by punishing those who would steal the bounty from her people

    Beyond Meat was over $200 in 2019. Now it is less than $2. TESLA Shareholders, take note.

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes: Video and transcript Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes has gotten considerable coverage in the media, e.g., “Tucker Carlson discusses ‘these Zionist Jews’ with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes in The Times of Israel” and “Heritage Foundation president stands by Tucker Carlson after host platforms antisemitism” in the Jewish Telegraph Agency....
  • anon[190] • Disclaimer says:

    “But there’s a middle ground that acknowledges that Jews should be judged as individuals, but that it also makes sense to talk about Jewish power as the consequence of the activism of particular Jews acting in particular influential groups. ”

    Does individual Jew engage into activism for Israel without referring to other American or British or German Jews? Did campus protester target American Jews? Why did American Jews come into rescue for Israeli Jews ?Why did the start talking of shared pain and threats from protesters’s angst on Israel? Israel teaches a contradictiry and internally opposite theme . Itdoesnt want Jews to be ” collectivized” but it makes sure thst Jews act collectively.

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Hail
    @kaganovitch

    Steve's comments on the death of Dick Cheney are a great example of some of his former positions ("Classic Sailer").

    He bashes "neocons" (a term I don't recall him using much lately) but doesn't stop in there: He says Israel and its Lobby were a/the(?) cause of the foolish adventurist-interventions associated with Cheney and the wider era; AND he says a Hollywood conspiracy of silence shields Jews , in the movie's case claiming they were innocent victims blindsided, shocked by Bald Man Bad warmongering.

    None of that is, however, from 2025-Sailer. He quoting himself writing sometime around the turn of the year 2018-19 about a Cheney movie by someone called McKay:


    McKay utterly bypasses the one interesting mystery still surrounding Dick Cheney’s career: What happened in the 1990s following Cheney’s impressive performance as George H.W. Bush’s Secretary of Defense that then led to his disastrous years as George W. Bush’s veep? Why did the man who prudently sided with GHWB to not go to Baghdad in 1991 fanatically encourage GWB to go to Baghdad in 2003?

    McKay never even raises this question.
     


    And, as far as I can recall, McKay doesn’t even mention the word “neoconservative” in his movie, even though both Mr. and Mrs. Cheney were affiliated with the neocon American Enterprise Institute from 1993.

    AEI had long been a worthy but dull advocate of Chamber of Commerce conservatism, delivering many a comprehensive study of worker’s-comp reform. But it discovered that there was more donor money in agitating for war with Israel’s enemies. Over the course of the 1990s, neocons at AEI and elsewhere became obsessed with taking out Saddam.

    On Twitter on Sunday, McKay defended his plot, saying he’d substituted big oil for the neocons:


    Fully aware of The Project for New American Century. And the letter they wrote to Clinton calling for overthrow of Saddam. We chose to acknowledge the pre-meditated nature of the invasion of Iraq through the energy commission and the maps of Iraqi oil fields…
     
    But, in reality, the oil companies weren’t terribly enthusiastic for the Iraq War before it happened and didn’t profit much from it later. Instead of No War for Oil, we got War for No Oil.

    But for the preservation of one’s Hollywood career, it’s better to blame the energy industry. This might explain an otherwise puzzling speech in Vice in which McKay implies that Israel, like France and Germany, was against the war.
     

    Yes, Classic Sailer commentary. If you delve back into the archives in the 2000s, the commentary is quite steadily like this.

    Replies: @Hail, @Mr. Anon, @Hypnotoad666

    But for the preservation of one’s Hollywood career, it’s better to blame the energy industry. This might explain an otherwise puzzling speech in Vice in which McKay implies that Israel, like France and Germany, was against the war.

    Whoa! Why is Respectable 2025 Steve “platforming” this Groyper 2019 Steve? This seems highly Anti-Semitic. I expect The Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism will now require Steve to denounce and deplatform himself.

    They’d probably cut him some slack if they knew he was Jewish. But if 2025 Steve does need to self-denounce, he can use the same template used by the Heritage guy who was denounced for failing to denounce Tucker for not denouncing Fuentes:

    [2025 Steve] also said that he was not familiar with [2019 Steve]’s views when he posted . . . “I didn’t know much about this [2019 Steve] guy. I still don’t, which underscores the mistake,” . . . . <a title=”'https://www.nationalreview.com/news/heritage-president-apologizes-for-tucker-carlson-defense-video-in-heated-all-hands-meeting/

    https://www.nationalreview.com/news/heritage-president-apologizes-for-tucker-carlson-defense-video-in-heated-all-hands-meeting/

    ‘ title=’https://www.nationalreview.com/news/heritage-president-apologizes-for-tucker-carlson-defense-video-in-heated-all-hands-meeting/

    ‘ >https://www.nationalreview.com/news/heritage-president-apologizes-for-tucker-carlson-defense-video-in-heated-all-hands-meeting/

    Incidentally, the Heritage guy’s worst crime was apparently that he troped.

    He did, however, apologize to Heritage’s Jewish staffers for using the term “venomous coalition” to describe Carlson’s critics, saying that he was not consciously employing an antisemitic trope.

    “The term ‘venomous coalition,’ a terrible choice of words, especially for our Jewish colleagues and friends who understand that, given history, to be a trope used against them. And I very sincerely — very, very, sincerely — apologize to you in particular, and to all of you for using that. It was not my intention to use a trope. I should have been better,” he said.

    Personally, it seems to me that it should be worse to independently conclude that Jews are a “venomous coalition” rather than just relying on the general consensus of society (i.e., the trope). But I suppose the humiliation rituals applicable to non-performing Shabbos Goy have their own Talmudic logic or something.

    Anyway . . . Fuentes gave an interesting name-check to Steve in his monologue again. While telling his supporters that they need to infiltrate the institutions while hiding their true beliefs he cites “Steve Sailer,” “Joe Lonsdale,” and “Chris Buskirk” (the last two guys I never heard of) as good examples of the type of masks you need to wear to pretend to be a card-carrying member of Conservatism, Inc. (Also, choice words for the new Lomez and Chris Rufo show being rolled out to appeal to Gen Z, Curtis Yarvin and assorted others).

    https://rumble.com/v718mss-america-first-ep.-1591.html?start=11946

    • LOL: deep anonymous
  • @MEH 0910
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_one-hit_wonders_in_the_United_States#1970s

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Interesting list! Over the years I’ve posted one-hit wonders from the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2010s.

    Also MEH, it’s nice to be appreciated—I notice and value your Thanks and Agree tags.

  • Well, the latest of these incessant polls concerning the Nov. 4 election for the mayoralty of New York are in, having arrived Thursday, Oct. 30, and if the story has changed it is only for the better. A new Emerson College survey puts Zohran Mamdani, front runner from the start, 25 percentage points ahead of...
  • @NobodyImportant
    @Sarita

    What kind of POS talks about someone's mother?
    You deserve to be dragged acrossed the pavement butt ass naked tied to a fucking horse and then thrown into a bath full of battery acid afterwards, FUCK YOU.

    Replies: @Sarita

    “FUCK YOU.”
    I’ll give you my address here in Medellin and I’ll say it to your face and you can say it to mine.
    Next time you wanna spread false, silly propaganda and fake stories go to a kindergarten not in an adults place.

    Oh I just remembered; we are in one. 😵‍💫

  • Most Zohran Mamdani voters loathe Nick Fuentes. Fuentes’ groypers aren’t big fans of Mamdani, either. But if “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” the two no-longer-marginalized figures, and their followers, ought to be friends. Mamdani’s election as mayor of New York, and Fuentes’ almost simultaneous entry into the mainstream conversation, are not unrelated....
  • Barrett – you are DELUSIONAL. The jeet Mamdani will simply rip off American for his co-orcs as much as possible, and won’t DO one little thing to dislodge jewish power. Fuentes is, essentially, a pundit. I don’t dislike him, but he follows whatever trend is popular. He’s very much an online phenomenon and nothing else.

    • Agree: David Parker
    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
    @Angharad

    I agree that it's highly unlikely that Fuentes and Mamdani will team up to save America. But as my headline says, they are "good signs." Like 2016 Trump, they are winning by bucking the media and its manufactured consensus. And unlike 2016 Trump, they and their smarter followers oppose, and frighten, America's ruling Zionist oligarchy. Just a few years ago, if anyone had said that an out-and-out anti-Zionist anti-oligarch would be elected NYC mayor, while someone with Fuentes' positions would be in the mainstream conversation, it would have sounded delusional.

    I'm not saying these guys are going to save us. I'm saying "ride the wave—spread the word: the Zionist oligarchy is the enemy, let's overthrow it." That's not unrealistic. New elites often overthrow old elites. And the Zio-oligarch elite that rules the USA is not just ripe and ready to fall, it's downright rotten.

  • I wrote about the coming Trump and Xi meeting in South Korea a week ago and predicted the meeting, while likely outwardly friendly, will be a nothing burger in substance and long-term impact. They met a few days ago and the result is very much as expected. Progress was made, mainly in transactional areas such...
  • @QCIC
    @tamo

    Why is it so hard to list some of the actual innovations? The Nature index is great and a lot of nice work is surely being completed in China, apparently more than the rest of the world combined. This was expected by HBD aficionados at the Unz Review such as Anatoly Karlin based on the average IQ and population numbers in China. It is nice to see this confirmed, but not surprising.

    If you look around online I am sure you can find something from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and similar organizations in various fields of investigation which list the top 100 Chinese innovations of the 21st century. Often these types of lists have useful descriptions of the work, intended for intelligent and educated non-specialists, which give the context, existing knowledge prior to the work and what is novel about the innovation. I still believe you will be pleased when you get around to doing this homework and posting such results. By "pleased" I mean really insufferable, but that's OK because it would be nice for everyone to know more about the innovations. I am equally interested in the same sort of information for India, Russia and everywhere else but there seems to be a lot more going on in China so let's start there.

    Replies: @tamo

    Since you are SO MUCH interested in finding out Chinese scientific achievements, why don’t you google the latest Chinese scientific and technological breakthroughs and innonvations? I know there are a lot of them. Do the search, it will do you good !!!

  • For more than thirty years, I'd occasionally come across harsh attacks against a British historian named John Charmley for writing a highly-critical biography of Winston Churchill, the famed British leader, and that was about the only thing I knew of that author. I'd always vaguely wondered exactly what he'd said about Churchill that had infuriated...
  • @Patrick McNally
    @Hartmann

    I'm not wrong about Lipstadt. Your own quotes show that she never claimed that 4 million Jews died at Auschwitz. The quotes which you yourself give have her speaking of 2 million dead Jews at Auschwitz. So, the argument of "if Auschwitz was 4 million but not it's 1 million then 6 million should be 3 million" is all wrong. At most if you were going to literally a reduction from here "2 million Jews killed at Auschwitz" to "1 million" then you end up back with something like the numbers which Gerald Reitlinger and Raul Hilberg gave. Reitlinger suggests about 1 million for Auschwitz and between 4,194,200 to 4,581,200 across Europe. Hilberg gives 1 million and 5.1 million as his figures for Auschwitz specifically and Europe in general. But no one has ever claimed that 4 million Jews were killed at Auschwitz. Your own quotations right here show that. Dawidowicz, Gilbert, Lipstadt, none of them are claiming that in the passages which you yourself have quoted.

    Replies: @Ron Unz

    I’m not wrong about Lipstadt. Your own quotes show that she never claimed that 4 million Jews died at Auschwitz.

    No, you’re dead-flat wrong and quite possibly dishonest. Here’s what you originally said and how I responded:

    The wild figure of “4 million” at Auschwitz was rejected by historians such as Gerald Reitlinger and Raul Hilberg back in the 1950s and ’60s. That is not a “post-Soviet” development.

    From what I remember, Deborah Lipstadt, the High Priestess of Holocaust Studies, absolutely accepted the 4M figure and ferociously denounced anyone who questioned it. She had vastly more public visibility on the issue than Reitlinger or Hilberg.

    I had never said that anyone claimed that 4 million Jews died at Auschwitz but that the official narrative had long claimed that 4 million total victims were killed there and all those citations people found in Lipstadt, Gilbert, Dawidowicz, and others proved I was entirely correct.

    You played the old trick of claiming that I had said something I hadn’t and then debunking it.

    You’re just as dishonest and slippery as always.

  • Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link Jason Farago, who appears to be a Deep State propagandist and pro-UkroNazi culture warrior, just published a New York Times interactive photo-video piece headlined “How Lunar Photography Brought the Heavens Down to Earth.” Farago celebrates the alleged artistic genius of the Apollo moon photos, viewing them...
  • @Sparkon
    Herewith, two blasts from the past with important facts you may not know about the dangers of protons in the Van Allen radiation belts:





    ATLAS PHOTOGRAPHS RADIATION BELTS


    BEDFORD, MASS., March 17 (UPI)—The Air Force reported yesterday that an Atlas intercontinental ballistic missile had photographed radiation belts circling the earth at an altitude of more than 700 miles.

    [...]

    Scientists explained that, despite the brief passage of the nose cone through lower limits of the innermost radiation belt, some 130,000,000 proton tracks were recorded in each cubic inch of the emulsions.

    [...}

    -- St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Thurs. Mar. 17, 1960
     
    https://archive.org/details/per_st-louis-post-dispatch_1960-03-17_82_76/page/n3/mode/1up?view=theater

    So there was just a brief passage of the nose cone with the recording package through the lower limits of the innermost radiation belt during this test back in 1960, yet 130 million proton strikes per cubic inch were recorded, proving once and for all time, I suppose, that the Apollo astronauts and their film would have had no trouble at all passing through those hundreds of millions of pesky protons in every inch of their jolly excursions to the Moon and back…or would they?

    But are protons even dangerous to astronauts?


    New Study Questions the Effects of Cosmic Proton Radiation on Human Cells

    February 1, 2006

    UPTON, NY - In deep space, protons are the most abundant type of charged particle. Therefore, before astronauts can safely travel far from Earth for long periods of time, it is important to know how protons affect cells - particularly the cells' DNA. Now, at Brookhaven National Laboratory's NASA Space Radiation Laboratory, scientists have found that protons are more damaging to DNA than previously assumed. The work is published in the February 2006 edition of the journal Radiation Research.

    "Scientists have been assuming that protons damage cells in a way similar to x-rays, but our results indicate that these assumptions have been wrong. The new data show that protons produce more potentially lethal double-strand breaks, a type of severe DNA damage, than other kinds of DNA damages," said Brookhaven biologist Betsy Sutherland, the study's lead researcher.

    "This means that scientists don't really know how human DNA is affected by the most numerous particles in space and, as a result, do not know how to design the proper protection for astronauts."
     
    -- Brookhaven National Laboratory
     
    https://www.bnl.gov/newsroom/news.php?a=110415

    Finally, for those who may be wondering, aluminum is not a good barrier against proton radiation:

    No, aluminum is not an effective shield for proton radiation, as it can create secondary protons when protons pass through it. While aluminum can stop less-energetic particles like alpha and beta radiation, protons are more penetrating and require materials with high atomic numbers (like iron or lead) or high hydrogen content (like polyethylene) to effectively stop them.

    -- Google AI
     

    Replies: @Kingsmeg

    “This means that scientists don’t really know how human DNA is affected by the most numerous particles in space and, as a result, do not know how to design the proper protection for astronauts.”

    — Brookhaven National Laboratory

    You would think that after sending 24 astronauts to the moon on Apollo missions, and then having access to those astronauts for decades until they died, they would have some idea.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Kingsmeg


    You would think that after sending 24 astronauts to the moon on Apollo missions, and then having access to those astronauts for decades until they died, they would have some idea.
     
    By the time that genetic and DNA testing were becoming commonplace, in the 1980s (and really not widespread until the 1990s), the Apollo astronauts had mostly left NASA and retired from their various military branches. I'd be surprised if any of them volunteered their bodily fluids for science, given that they were all pilots who had come to despise flight surgeons, and NASA flight surgeons in particular. They no longer had to give a s**t, so they didn't.

    There are however lots of studies of the effects of space radiation on human DNA from shuttle-era astronauts.

    Replies: @showmethereal

    , @showmethereal
    @Kingsmeg

    Just like you would think they would want to know the condition of the equipment they left up there. I’m sure it would have lots of practical application for materials science here on earth…. You know - kind of like every other space mission by every space agency says is their goal. But hey - I guess that’s thinking too much

    Replies: @Kingsmeg

  • Most Zohran Mamdani voters loathe Nick Fuentes. Fuentes’ groypers aren’t big fans of Mamdani, either. But if “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” the two no-longer-marginalized figures, and their followers, ought to be friends. Mamdani’s election as mayor of New York, and Fuentes’ almost simultaneous entry into the mainstream conversation, are not unrelated....
  • @Anon
    With Mamdani, New Yorkers are just trying to elect Bill de Blasio again, who was a disaster. Brown and blacks are 70% of NYC now, which means the city has the average IQ of Haiti.

    Liberalism is electing the same type of political idiot over and over again and expecting different results.

    Replies: @Angharad

    Correct. Thank you. The Muslim jeet is just there for the grift, and there’s that pic of him and Soros the younger.

    • Agree: David Parker
  • Isn’t Islam inherently violent? What stopped the Islamic world having an Enlightenment? Why are some Muslims so into head-chopping? And isn’t Hamas the same as Islamic State? A recent conversation with a friend highlighted to me how little most westerners know about Islam, and how they struggle to distinguish between Islam and Islamism. This lack...
  • @muh muh
    @Tennessee Jed


    Maybe you Jameson and meamjojo can put your heads together and come up with a new catch phrase.
     
    I'd envision Moe, Larry, and Curly simultaneously headbutting each other in a brainstorming huddle, but I'd rather not offend the dignity of the stooges. 🕶️

    Replies: @Tennessee Jed

    It seems jew morons come in sets of three.

  • Author’s note: The caption “Entartete Musik” featured on this and other images means “degenerate music.” This along with greater condemnations of degenerate art were a prominent platform position of a certain political movement in the past. Some readers may recognize the stylized lettering from a certain progpaganda poster as well. The cultural milieu any individual...
  • @Trinity
    @notanonymoushere

    I thought good ole Sparky was a troll but now I know he/she/it is……..

    Replies: @Sparkon

    I thought good ole Sparky was a troll but now I know he/she/it is……..

    The pot calls the teacup black,

    You and notanon really got all shook up by my comments about music the double standard, and Identity Politics, didn’t you? And now you’re both whirling around in the mosh pits of your minds seeing just how low you can go in the race to the bottom.

    Squirm on, dude.

  • Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link Jason Farago, who appears to be a Deep State propagandist and pro-UkroNazi culture warrior, just published a New York Times interactive photo-video piece headlined “How Lunar Photography Brought the Heavens Down to Earth.” Farago celebrates the alleged artistic genius of the Apollo moon photos, viewing them...
  • @roonaldo
    @Truth Vigilante

    Couldn't do it, could ya--visit the website I mentioned and learn something, let alone refute any of their presentations.

    Your moniker isn't apt, TV.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Truth Vigilante

    Couldn’t do it, could ya–visit the website I mentioned and learn something, let alone refute any of their presentations.

    Of course he couldn’t. You and I could read what Bart Sibrel or Dave McGowan have written about the so-called “Moon Hoax”. I have. You probably have too. But morons like “Truth Vigilante” don’t want to know – they want to believe. So they won’t touch anything that might dispel their notions. Not that they would understand much of it anyway, as they are obviously not too bright.

    The Moon Hoax is TV’s security blanket. As somebody who is highly sub-mediocre, it comforts him to believe that nobody in the past ever achieved anything of note.

  • For more than thirty years, I'd occasionally come across harsh attacks against a British historian named John Charmley for writing a highly-critical biography of Winston Churchill, the famed British leader, and that was about the only thing I knew of that author. I'd always vaguely wondered exactly what he'd said about Churchill that had infuriated...
  • @Patrick McNally
    @Ron Unz

    > I think that the standard position taken by Holocaust Deniers is that Treblinka and those other two sites were merely transit camps.

    Well, it's simple enough to open a copy of Thomas Dalton, Debating the Holocaust, and read:

    "Earlier in this book I suggested that revisionist analysis is consistent with using 10 percent of the orthodox numbers... taking 10 percent of Hilberg, we arrive at 80,000 as a nominal estimate."
    -- P. 147.

    From the 2003 edition of Graf/Mattogno, Majdanek, p. 247:

    "More than 40,000 Majdanek inmates died..."

    Just those brief examples should be enough to justify what I had said:

    "But they have always allowed for some tens of thousands of deaths among the deportees at the location of each camp."

    Replies: @Ron Unz

    > I think that the standard position taken by Holocaust Deniers is that Treblinka and those other two sites were merely transit camps.

    Well, it’s simple enough to open a copy of Thomas Dalton, Debating the Holocaust, and read:

    “Earlier in this book I suggested that revisionist analysis is consistent with using 10 percent of the orthodox numbers… taking 10 percent of Hilberg, we arrive at 80,000 as a nominal estimate.”
    — P. 147.

    From the 2003 edition of Graf/Mattogno, Majdanek, p. 247:

    “More than 40,000 Majdanek inmates died…”

    Just those brief examples should be enough to justify what I had said:

    I really don’t see how that very casual statement by Dalton carries any weight. Based upon your quote, it’s not even clear to what he was referring.

    And your Graf/Mattogno reference is to Majdanek. Perhaps you somehow missed that I was referring to Treblinka and the other two Reinhard camps, Belzec and Sobibor. Or maybe you were just trying to pull a fast one and hoped that I wouldn’t notice.

    The claim is that those latter three were all transit camps, so almost no one is buried there. Meanwhile the official narrative declares that the remains of around 1.5 million victims are buried there, which constitutes a pretty wide factual gulf.

  • Nikolai Kardashev, the famed Soviet astrophysicist, defined Type 1 civilization as a society that has achieved full control and mastery over all the energy resources of its home planet. Such a civilization can harness solar, wind, geothermal, and tidal energy, and would be on the cusp of becoming multi-planetary. According to physicist Carl Sagan’s interpolation...
  • @ServesyouallWhite
    @SteveK9

    Fast-neutron reactors will ultimately fission all the uranium that is mined, both the 0.7% that is U-235, and the 99.3% that is U-238. The engineering is basically done. Russia has operated liquid-sodium reactors for decades (the US had done so as well, but abandoned the technology). Russia is currently building a liquid-lead prototype reactor. China is building sodium cooled reactors as well.

    Nuclear energy proponents always reminded me of 'Egyptologists'.

    'Well, the Pyramids were constructed by a bunch of guys hauling and stacking impossibly heavy stones using sticks and rocks...........Wait! sticks and rope!....Wait!! ' Now where is my university tenure, fat paycheck, grants to spend on needless/useless trips to Egypt 50 times yearly and my regular TV spot?'

    or the 'high IQ geniuses' who swear on their infant child's life that glyphosate and covid vaxes are safe and beneficial.

    Anyhow Steve, would appreciate any and all links you can provide to support your statements about these magical new clean sources of nuclear salvation to mankind's energy woes.

    In the meanwhile, I will go visit Karen Silkwood's grave and binge watch 'The China Syndrome' where Three Mile Island actually occurred less than two weeks after the movie showed-

    https://whyy.org/articles/three-mile-island-accident-was-eerily-foreshadowed-by-a-hollywood-blockbuster-days-before/

    I think I will go put flowers on Karen Silkwood's grave, book a trip to the permanently contaminated Chernobyl site and go suck on some Depleted Uranium pellets left over from Dick Cheney's Desert Storm 2.....

    Replies: @QCIC

    Yes, nuclear reactors do not seem sensible in an era when government-sponsored terrorists of all stripes are running about. I wonder if the big push for small modular reactors (SMR) is really just because the blighted area associated with each reactor breach will be smaller?

    One of the big clues about nuclear reactors is they are not really insurable.

    History may show that August 6, 1945 was the end of the high trust society.

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes: Video and transcript Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes has gotten considerable coverage in the media, e.g., “Tucker Carlson discusses ‘these Zionist Jews’ with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes in The Times of Israel” and “Heritage Foundation president stands by Tucker Carlson after host platforms antisemitism” in the Jewish Telegraph Agency....
  • Sometimes you need a Stalin to whip things into shape.


    Video Link

    • LOL: Liza
  • Masking black-on-white homicides has been the norm for the legacy media for the past century. We’re here to pull the cover off its cover-up. The woke left is adept at bending reality to fit its narrative, often ignoring scientific consensus in favor of ideological agendas. For instance, while science acknowledges the biological binary of sex,...
  • @anonymouseperson
    @Truth

    That African ant would jump on a boat and go to Europe in a second just like its human counterparts if it could.

    Replies: @Truth

    Maybe,

    And the King and Queen European ants would welcome them to the hive with open arms, just like their human counterparts.

  • Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link Jason Farago, who appears to be a Deep State propagandist and pro-UkroNazi culture warrior, just published a New York Times interactive photo-video piece headlined “How Lunar Photography Brought the Heavens Down to Earth.” Farago celebrates the alleged artistic genius of the Apollo moon photos, viewing them...
  • @Dutch Abraham
    @Mr. Anon

    Seriously Mr. annoying A-non-entity, you really think office fires brought down the twin towers and Building 7? Is Rurik making a valid claim when he says that?

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    Seriously Mr. annoying A-non-entity, you really think office fires brought down the twin towers and Building 7? Is Rurik making a valid claim when he says that?

    @Dumb Abraham

    No, I don’t think that “office fires” brought down the World Trade Center buildings. If you care what I think, you can read my posts in the relevant threads.

    For myself, I don’t care what you think, and I certainly don’t care what that driveling idiot, “Rurik” thinks.

    Like most fantasists, you are not intellectually honest. You were gassing on in a previous thread about the lunar lander looking like a toy made of bits of junk, and I showed you pictures of the underlying structure (I posted another picture here on this thread) and you just ignored it. That’s what all you clowns do. You say: what about “A”. Somebody answers your question, and then you say “but what about B”, etc., etc. No – go back to “A”. Tell us why you were wrong about “A”. At least admit that you full of s**t about the lunar lander. Your misconceptions are the result of ignorance and incuriosity. You espouse the “I don’t understand how something could work therefore it can’t possibly exist.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    @Mr. Anon

    Mr A-non-entity writes:


    No, I don’t think that “office fires” brought down the World Trade Center buildings.
     
    Now UR readers, do you notice that after saying this above, A-non-entity does not elaborate on exactly what caused, in his opinion, the WTC towers and the unstruck-by-a-plane Building 7 to collapse.
    You see, he doesn't want to reveal his tainted-by-ZOG beliefs.
    (He did that in a previous UR thread - with the result that Rurik, myself and several others tore shreds off him).

    So A-non-entity, let's hear the WHOLE story about 9/11, from your perspective.
    While you're at it, tell us who really killed JFK and brother Bobby.
    Tell us if you believe in the fanciful '6 million yids/gas chambers' Holohoax fable.
    You see Mr Non--entity, we want to know who the real* person is behind that handle of yours.

    (*For those simpletons among you that believe Men Walked on the Moon, you need only scroll up to the second half of my comment # 520 where, as I'm responding to Yukon Jack, I inform him of Mr A-non-entity and his extensive history in the Enclave of Imbecility. ie: the Steve Sailer threads).

    Steve Sailer is a KNOWN APOLOGIST AND SLAVISH FOOT SOLDIER OF ZOG.
    This is not just my opinion. Countless UR participants have said the same about comments of theirs that were throttled by Sailer, because they offended the sensibilities of Sailer's yiddish patrons and benefactors.

    Summary: All you Moon Hoaxers (seeing as you believe in the ZOG orchestrated Apollo mission hoax), never lose sight of the fact that Mr A-non-entity, a confirmed Malignant Jew, is on your side in this argument.

    And he's not just posting the occasional comment here and there in this thread.
    He is in full 'Damage Control Mode' trying to salvage the indefensible official narrative of:
    Men Walked on the Moon during the Apollo smoke and mirrors illusion.
    He has been instructed to do this by his ADL controllers.

    Meanwhile, on the other side of the equation are the likes of Yukon Jack, Iris, Laurent Guyenot, Erebus, the Apollo investigatory legend Bart Sibrel, myself and countless others.
    Collectively we represent the 'APOLLO MOON MISSION SCEPTICS'.
    We are certainly NOT Moon Hoaxers, seeing as WE'RE ACTIVELY WORKING TO EXPOSE THIS HOAX.
     
    It is the gullible nitwits that are advocating for this preposterous Hoax - just as the same yarmulke adorned disinformers (and their shabbos goy underlings), were trying to defend the 'Magic Bullet* Theory' of the JFK assassination.

    (*You know the bullet I speak of. Its the one fired in a DOWNWARD trajectory - allegedly from Oswald in the TSBD - that struck JFK in the back.
    It then somehow gained ALTITUDE and exited from JFK's throat (about 4-5 inches HIGHER than the entrance wound in JFK's back).

    It then momentarily stopped in mid air, made a sharp turn and then RESUMED IT'S DOWNWARD TRAJECTORY to strike Governor Connally, shattering a rib bone, then exiting the Governor's chest and thereafter striking bones in his hand etc.
    You'd expect that slug to be pretty mangled after all that.
    But it was later 'found' in near pristine condition).

    Well UR readers, the story of the Manned Moon Landings is even more ridiculous and scientifically untenable than that.
    Yet you Moon Hoaxer automatons keep swallowing it up.
    Stupid is as stupid does.
  • Author’s note: The caption “Entartete Musik” featured on this and other images means “degenerate music.” This along with greater condemnations of degenerate art were a prominent platform position of a certain political movement in the past. Some readers may recognize the stylized lettering from a certain progpaganda poster as well. The cultural milieu any individual...
  • @Trinity
    @Sparkon

    Ask 100 people on the street ( make sure they are somewhat knowledgeable about and know each artist), who is better
    Whitney Houston or Barbara Streisand
    Celine Dion or Babs
    Mariah Carey or Babs
    Leann Rimes or Babs
    Pat Benatar or Babs

    And see what kind of results you come up with.
    Babs vs. Whitney ( Babs might have 0-2 votes)
    Babs vs Mariah ( Babs would be lucky to score between 3-4 votes)
    Babs vs Leann *make sure they know Rimes biggest hits ( maybe 3-4 votes for Babs)
    Babs vs. Celine (Babs might have 0-2 votes)

    And IF the 100 asked are true music aficionados I am being overly generous to Babs because I can’t see how she would receive even one vote. Jews RUN the music industry just as they do Hollywood that is why they pushed Babs so much. Like I said she had talent but she wasn’t in the same league. Comparing Babs to the top female singers of all times is like comparing the National Championship College Football Champions to the Super Bowl Champs.

    Through with Babs. Bored.

    Replies: @Sparkon

    Ask 100 people on the street ( make sure they are somewhat knowledgeable about and know each artist), who is better

    You live in a fantasy world. The results are already in.

    Barbara Streisand holds the record for the most No. 1 albums by a female artist with 11 chart-topping albums.

    Anyway, you overlooked a lot more memorable chanteuses than just Babs, so rather than wasting anymore time trying to educate you, I’ll just spin a couple more tunes:

    Video Link
    Jewel – “You Were Meant For me” – 1995

    Video Link
    Sheryl Crow – “All I Wanna Do” – 1993

    Video Link
    Paula Cole – “Where Have All The Cowboys Gone?” – 1997

    • Replies: @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
    @Sparkon

    People can agree to disagree re: babs; however, just cuz an artist has tons of commercially successful albums doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re a great artist per se.

  • If you want the best description of why Europe will struggle to finalise agreement to lend Ukraine $140bn using immobilised Russian assets held in Belgium’s Euroclear, then you should watch the presentation recently given by Belgium’s Prime Minister, Bart de Wever. He spoke at the end of a European Council meeting in which agreement was...
  • Bart de Wever’s speech is interesting and his clarification of the distinction between frozen and immobilized assets is useful.

    I wonder if Nabiullina and Putin have been counting on this issue?

    Beyond the three points discussed, his message is loud and clear that Russia has to be defeated to make this bankster theft possible.

    What happens next may depend on what the owners of Euroclear want to do. Maybe they create some exotic new financial ‘product’ which allows Euroclear to disburse the Russian funds, legalities be damned. We may be approaching that point.

    I suppose de Wever is concerned that this mess could wreck Belgium. If he gets too squeamish, maybe Sanna Marin is looking for something else to foul.

  • During the early 1990s Germar Rudolf was a young chemist employed at Germany's prestigious Max Planck Institute with a bright future ahead of him. But then he was hired to conduct a chemical analysis of the walls of the Auschwitz concentration camp. One thing led to another and he spent the next thirty-odd years suffering...
  • @Anonymous534
    @Ron Unz

    If you permit me a long machine-translated quote from Anti-Suvorov by Russian historian Andrey Isaev.

    It goes on and on to discuss military plans of other countries too later on, but the pattern is the same: if you're going to get into war (no matter offensive or defensive one) you want to be on the offense.



    Chapter 1
    Competition for Offensive Plans

    [Suvorov] asserts that the USSR only had an offensive plan for a “liberation campaign”: "When asked directly whether the Soviet command had plans for war, Zhukov replied categorically: yes, they did. This raises the question: if there were plans, then why did the Red Army act like a spontaneous mass without any plans? Then the question arises: if there were plans, why did the Red Army act as a spontaneous mass without any plans? Zhukov did not answer this question. And the answer here is obvious. If the Soviet headquarters worked very intensively, developing war plans, but these were not defensive or counteroffensive plans, then what were they?

    Answer: purely offensive ones. However, the question remained unanswered: whose plans were defensive? All the war plans of the major powers involved in the two world wars of the 20th century were offensive. Moreover, the offensive nature did not depend on who initiated the war. For military planning, it was completely irrelevant; the plans did not consider the order in which war would be declared. Only the plans of small countries were defensive, with the main line of planning in this case being stubborn defense in the hope that powerful allies would crush the opponents who had attacked the dwarf country.

    The reader will immediately have two questions: "Why were the plans offensive, and why did the plans not help the Red Army
    in 1941?"

    First, let's look back at how the war and its initial operations were planned in 1914. Many tactical and strategic decisions of the subsequent war stemmed from the previous war. Therefore, without understanding the events of 1914, it is difficult to understand the events of the fateful 1939 and the tragic 1941. Let's start with the Entente. Readers have probably heard about Germany and the Schlieffen Plan, and I will only remind you of its main points a little later. In my opinion, the essence of military planning in France and Russia is most clearly reflected in the words recorded in the minutes of the meeting of the chiefs of staff on July 13, 1912: "Both chiefs of the General Staff declare by mutual agreement that the words ‘defensive war’ cannot be understood to mean that 'the war will be fought defensively'. On the contrary, they confirm the absolute necessity for the Russian and French armies to launch a decisive and, as far as possible, simultaneous offensive...".(Materials on the history of Franco-Russian relations for 1910-1914. Collection of secret diplomatic documents. Moscow: 1922. p. 708). These words are repeated in the minutes of the meeting in August 1913 and August 1911 in virtually unchanged form.
    So, France entered the war with the so-called Plan No. 17 by Joffre. It provided for an offensive by German armies in two directions, the first to the east from the area south of the fortress of Toul, between the wooded areas of the Vosges and the Moselle River, the second to the northeast from the areas north of the Verdun line - Metz line. The plan assumed that the main body of German forces would advance into France through Luxembourg and southern Belgium. The French troops' strike was therefore directed at the left flank of the anticipated German strike force.

    That is, the explanation for the offensive nature of the plan is quite obvious — instead of taking a blow to the forehead, we strike at the flank, forcing the enemy to abandon the offensive under the threat of a flanking maneuver. I think it is also necessary to say a few words about the French army of those years, as there are many interesting parallels.
    The basis of military doctrine was “élan” (impulse); in simpler terms, strategy and tactics were offensive. The French statute of 1913 began with a lofty statement:

    "The French army, returning to its tradition, recognizes no other law than the law of attack." This was followed by commandments composed of self-explanatory theses: “attack without hesitation,” "ferocity and persistence ,“ ”break the enemy's will,“ ”ruthless and relentless pursuit." “Only the offensive,” proclaimed the charter, " leads to positive results." The country's top leadership was in the same mood. The President of the Republic, Falaire, declared in 1913: "Only the offensive corresponds to the temperament of the French soldier. We are determined to advance against the enemy without hesitation." Those who wish to do so can feel free to look for 10 differences with what we saw before 1941, while we continue our narrative by turning to Russia's military plans from 1914.

    As expected at joint meetings of the chiefs of the French and Russian general staffs, the plans of the Russian command were also offensive. I will allow myself to quote the documents. According to the 1912 plan, approved by Nicholas II on May 1, 1914, the overall objective was "to launch an offensive against the armed forces of Germany and Austria-Hungary with the aim of transferring the war to their territory." (History of Russian Military Strategy. Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole, 2000. p. 101. With reference to RGVIA, F. 2000, Op. 1. D. 459, L. 7). It was assumed that the war aims would be achieved within 1.5-2 months. In 1914, everything was also in order with “little bloodshed, on foreign territory.” Speaking about Russia's military plans, I would like to note the following. The offensive nature of the Russian army's actions was explained not only by its allied obligations. Its commitments to France determined the direction of the main strike — Germany, the so-called Plan G. Since East Prussia was a tough nut to crack, the Russian high command considered it more expedient to launch the main attack on Austria-Hungary, the so-called Plan A, but a passive strategy was not envisaged under any circumstances. The final version of the plan, adopted under pressure from Joffre, implemented a strategy of influencing the Germans in order to force them to disperse their forces. It was assumed that Germany would launch its main attack on France. If Russian troops pursued a passive, defensive strategy, the Germans could leave a minimum forces in East Prussia, concentrating the strongest possible force against France. Then, after defeating France, they would turn all their forces towards Russia. On the contrary, if the Russian army launched an offensive against East Prussia, the Germans would have to weaken the force operating against France by strengthening the defense of that area. Moreover (as actually happened), in the event of strong pressure from Russian troops on the cradle of the Prussian spirit, it would be necessary to withdraw the troops advancing in France, put them on trains, and transport them to the East. These patterns, which apply to different theaters of war, are also applicable to the large front lines of the two warring armies. If we are advancing on one section of the front, it is advisable to conduct active offensive operations on the other as well, in order to prevent the enemy from redeploying reserves to the aid of its troops.
    Now it is the turn of the Axis powers' plans. Let us begin with Austria-Hungary.

    Conceptually, of course, there is nothing new—the war plan is offensive. But allow me to quote word for word what Russian Army General Andrei Medardovich Zayonchkovsky, who taught future Red commanders the hard lessons of World War I, wrote about the motivation behind Austria-Hungary's offensive plans. So: "Konrad writes in his memoirs that his guiding principle in operations against Russia was to attack regardless of the risk, since defense at the first clashes would have led to disaster for the Austro-Hungarian army. The 40 divisions assembled in Galicia (Echelons “A” and “C”), could not remain passive at a time when the numerically superior Russian forces would be pressing the allies in East Prussia and Romania, and then, after an easy victory over them, would fall with all their might on Austria-Hungary.

    Crossing the Upper Vistula near its confluence with the San River and pinning down the Austro-Hungarian armies in Galicia, the Russians would have opened a clear path to Berlin or Vienna. "First of all, it is possible to engage the Russian troops concentrated between the Vistula and Bug rivers in a general battle with large forces, with the assistance from the north Vistula and Bug rivers, with the assistance from the north of a strike on Sedlec by most of the German forces gathered in East Prussia — that was the immediate goal of my plan," writes Conrad (Feltlmarschall Conrad. Aus meiner Dienstzeit, IV. 1923. C. 286) (Zayonchkovsky A.M. World War 1914-1918. M.: State Military Publishing House of the People's Commissariat of Defense of the USSR. 1938. pp. 67-68). The well-known Soviet
    military theorist A. Svechin paints an even more prosaic picture of the situation: "The Austrian General Staff, headed by Conrad, reasoned before the world war as follows: Russia can field 35 divisions against us on the 20th day of mobilization, 60 divisions on the 30th day — 60 divisions; Austria can have four dozen divisions on the 20th day. This means that the Austrians must advance: if they defend, they will be crushed; if they attack, they can even count on a certain numerical superiority." (Svechin, A. Understanding the Art of War. M.: Russky put. 2000. P. 370). The motives of the Austro-Hungarian high command are quite obvious. If they start to advance, there is a chance to crush a number of Russian divisions, taking advantage of their initial superiority. The Russian divisions arriving after mobilization would no longer have such an overwhelming advantage; of the 60 divisions on the 30th day of mobilization, a certain number would be deducted, having been killed by the Austrians in a battle of 40 Austrians against 35 Russians. We see practically the same motives that essentially forced the leaders of the general staffs of different countries to draw arrows on maps pointing to the territory of neighboring states with which war could break out. There is no alternative to this, or we give the initiative to the enemy, and he attacks our ally or a section of the common front that is advantageous to him with superior forces, achieves success there, and then attacks us or another section of the front with all his might. An army that chooses a passive strategy will simply be destroyed piece by piece. On the contrary, if the plans are offensive and the strategy is active, the enemy will not feel secure in its defense on those sections of the front where it does not plan to take active action.

    Instead of concentrating all possible forces on the direction of the main strike, the enemy will be forced to weaken the strike force by sending troops to reinforce the defense of the passive sector threatened by our strike. Based on these general strategic considerations, offensive plans are being developed in the headquarters of armies preparing for another war.
    The last of the plans we are considering is Germany's plan, based on Schlieffen's ideas. It is not our task to describe this plan in detail, but I will note one important aspect. Despite its general offensive orientation, the plan provided for defensive actions in East Prussia, relying on the developed railway network and the legendary fortifications of this area, which proved to be a tough nut to crack for the Russian army in two world wars. This is an important feature of offensive plans that should not be forgotten under any circumstances. The front line between the armies is large, and it is impossible to attack everywhere: there will inevitably be areas where it will be necessary to build defenses. In the case of Schlieffen's plan, such areas were to be East Prussia and the left flank of the German army, which relied on the fortress of Metz. What general conclusion can be drawn from this? Planning an offensive operation does not preclude the possibility of building defensive structures in certain sections of the front and taking up a strong defensive position, the task of which is to tie down as many enemy forces as possible while our strike wings do their job. Purely defensive plans are the lot of small states, whose task is either to hold out until a powerful ally crushes their enemy, or to sell themselves dearly. An example of such a strategy can be seen in the actions of Serbia and Belgium in World War I.

    So, we gradually move on to the events of World War II. “Maybe something has changed?” the reader may ask. No, the basic principles of strategy mentioned above have not gone anywhere. The Polish plan for war with Germany was based on the same Poland's plan for war with Germany was based on the same ideas about the role and place of defense in war that had led to the writing of offensive plans 20 years earlier. Commander-in-Chief Marshal Rydz-Śmigły, despite the obvious fact that Germany was stronger than Poland and would likely strike not at Poland's ally France, but at Poland itself, included in his plan not only a defensive element, the retention of all Polish territory, but also an offensive element, a strike against the German forces in East Prussia. On the border with East Prussia, one small group of the Polish army (two divisions, two cavalry brigades) was deployed in the Suwalki area, another, larger one (the Modlin Army, consisting of four divisions and two cavalry brigades) — along the southern edge East Prussia, and a third (the Pomeranian Army, consisting of six divisions) in the “Polish Corridor.” This distribution of forces indicates an intention to launch an offensive along converging directions against German troops in East Prussia.

    In a sense, the Polish army was replicating the situation of 1914, when a strike on East Prussia was supposed to distract German forces from the main direction, the Polish western border. We will leave the feasibility of this plan aside for now; we are only interested in its nature. I would like to note that the facts I have presented are not secret; all of the above can be read in “open sources.” A short quote: "The basis of Poland's strategic deployment in September 1939 was an offensive plan aimed at capturing Danzig and East Prussia." (Isserson G.S. New Forms of Struggle. Moscow: Voenizdat. 1940. pp. 33-34). Georgy Samoilovich analyzes the grouping of Polish troops and concludes:

    "Thus, the entire Polish army, not counting the cover on the eastern border and the reserve within the country, consisted of 6-7 separate groups and was mainly directed northward, against Danzig and East Prussia. The strong Poznan group of troops constituted a kind of strategic reserve and, in the dreams of some strategic fantasists, apparently was supposed to make a victorious entry into Berlin, from which it was separated by a distance of only 150 km." (Ibid. p. 35). The reasons for Poland's defeat Poland's defeat lay not so much in the plan as in its deployment and mobilization…

    Replies: @Ron Unz

    If you permit me a long machine-translated quote from Anti-Suvorov by Russian historian Andrey Isaev.

    Well, I looked at that 2,500 word machine-translated chapter, and it was mostly about WWI or the Polish campaign of WWII. He’s correct that the Poles very foolishly planned to mount an offensive against Germany in 1939 and I think their top general may have even boasted that he would capture Berlin.

    But if anything, that would support what I’m saying about Barbarossa. The Germans were obviously planning an offensive, but the configuration of the Soviet forces indicates exactly the same thing on their side.

  • Most Zohran Mamdani voters loathe Nick Fuentes. Fuentes’ groypers aren’t big fans of Mamdani, either. But if “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” the two no-longer-marginalized figures, and their followers, ought to be friends. Mamdani’s election as mayor of New York, and Fuentes’ almost simultaneous entry into the mainstream conversation, are not unrelated....
  • The United States is hellish

    • Agree: Same old same old
  • The late saint of the communist calendar, Rosa Luxemburg, often called her opponents ‘Shabbos-goyim,’ meaning servants of the Jews. A Shabbos-goy is a non-Jew who toadies to every wish and whim of the Jews, especially in politics, or a non-Jew who is heavily supportive of Israel, says the dictionary. They are a breed apart. One...
  • ‘Salvation is from the Jews’ is a mistranslation of John 4:22. The correct translation is “for life is from Judah”

  • Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link Jason Farago, who appears to be a Deep State propagandist and pro-UkroNazi culture warrior, just published a New York Times interactive photo-video piece headlined “How Lunar Photography Brought the Heavens Down to Earth.” Farago celebrates the alleged artistic genius of the Apollo moon photos, viewing them...
  • I feel that you have damaged your reputation as a “public intellectual”, until now unblemished, by calling Ron Unz “a very shallow thinker” or “a troll.” Both of these characterizations are risible.

    ‘Risible’? It’s worse than that. The commentator who described Ron Una as a “shallow thinker” sounds like an arrogant fool. Have you no gratitude, sir?

    A rude remark like that is entirely inappropriate, uncalled for, disrespectful, and just plain wrong.

    The lack of civility on this site is getting worse. Dear friends: please show better manners. It benefits us all.

    • Agree: showmethereal
    • Thanks: Eustace Tilley (not)
    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    @mark green


    The lack of civility on this site is getting worse.
    Dear friends: please show better manners. It benefits us all.
     
    Civility and manners are all well and good. But they should NEVER be used as an excuse to cover for the disinformation that is being peddled by the likes of you.

    There comes a time when grown men need to be confronted with some tough love.
    Now, if that entails having some profanity dished out on occasion, so be it.
    After all, they're just eff'n words - it's not like I dropped white phosphorus incendiaries on your wife and children while you were away fighting the IDF on the front lines - like the Apartheid Israeli state regularly does to non-combatants.

    Markie, you're badly in need of it.
    (In fact, a good bitch slapping would go a long way towards improving your character).
    Arnold Schwarzenegger has some good advice for you Markie (3 sec video):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73HZ9Wd0Nhs

    And one day in the future, you will have forgotten about the embarrassment that was handed out to you. In fact, you'll laugh it off - knowing that you were now a better person for having abandoned that ridiculous notion that Men Walked on the Moon.
  • @Mr. Anon
    @MoT


    So THEY say.
     
    As opposed to what? What Bart Sibrel (a TV cameraman and taxi driver) say? What Bill Kaysing (a librarian) says? What insane lunatics like "Truth Vigilante" say? What drooling idiots like "Rurik" say?

    You want to hang your hats on what that clown-college of retards think, be my guest.

    What is obvious is that it's not difficult to fool a lot of people - people like you - with ill-informed tripe concocted by morons.

    Replies: @Iris

    As opposed to what? What Bart Sibrel (a TV cameraman and taxi driver) say? What Bill Kaysing (a librarian) says? What insane lunatics like “Truth Vigilante” say? What drooling idiots like “Rurik” say?

    For your information, there are scores of Russian scientists with STEM PhD’s who publicly say that the NASA Moon Landing was a Hoax. They say it on TV shows, write books about it, and manage very well informed websites.

    One of the most prominent is Professor Alexander Popov, who has a PhD in Mathematics and another in Physics, who taught both subjects in Moscow Engineering Physics Institute for all of his professional life, and is author and co-author of 15 inventions and more than 100 publications in the field of laser technology, spectroscopy, absorption analysis, gas analysis, and laser optics. Laser optics, you know, the field that makes ground-breaking Quantum Physics technology the US is so far lagging behind…

    TV and Rurik are in excellent company, first-class intellectual minds; don’t worry about them.👍

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Iris


    For your information, there are scores of Russian scientists with STEM PhD’s who publicly say that the NASA Moon Landing was a Hoax. They say it on TV shows, write books about it, and manage very well informed websites.
     
    Scores, huh? And yet you only ever mention one - this Popov fellow.

    One of the most prominent is Professor Alexander Popov, who has a PhD in Mathematics and another in Physics, who taught both subjects in Moscow Engineering Physics Institute for all of his professional life, and is author and co-author of 15 inventions and more than 100 publications in the field of laser technology, spectroscopy, absorption analysis, gas analysis, and laser optics.
     
    Not aerospace engineering, I might add.

    Laser optics, you know, the field that makes ground-breaking Quantum Physics technology the US is so far lagging behind…
     
    Lagging? Really? The US is lagging compared to Russia in.......what area of scientific research again?

    I watched part of some video with that guy Popov. He was rambling on about clouds, based on some low-resolution movie footage of the Apollo 11 launch. It's meaningless. He may be an expert on lasers - I have no idea. But he certainly hasn't provided any conclusive evidence that the Moon landings were faked. And nobody believes that he has, outside of you and a few other Russian chauvinists.

  • You pre-drink appetizer: Bowie, Maryland is 55% black. Washington DC is a short 35 minutes away, and is a 48% black city. Remember this as we present you your shot and chaser. And, it's vital you understand the state of Maryland is 33% black. Okay, how about a shot or two? Ready? Shot. [Six Flags...
  • @usNthem
    About the only thing that might be a “strategic fit” in a majority black area is a maximum security prison…

    Replies: @Tennessee Jed

    With an electric chair, gas chamber and lethal injection table.

  • Remember this as we present you your shot and chaser. And, it’s vital you understand the state of Maryland is 33% black.

    No it isn’t. Your reading ability is just 100% you.

  • The only hope to save ourselves from Trump’s authoritarianism is mass movements. We must build alternative centers of power — including political parties, media, labor unions and universities — to give a voice and agency to those who have been disempowered by our two ruling parties, especially the working class and working poor. We must...
  • Man is the one animal that doesn’t live by the law of nature. When the coyote decimates the rabbit population, the coyotes starve down to a number that allows the rabbit population to rebound. Then the coyote rebounds due to the ample supply of rabbits, again decimating the rabbit population.

    Starting to get the idea?

    • Agree: Same old same old
    • Thanks: Gvaltar
    • Replies: @Biff
    @Horses Laugh


    When the coyote decimates the rabbit population, the coyotes starve down to a number that allows the rabbit population to rebound. Then the coyote rebounds due to the ample supply of rabbits, again decimating the rabbit population.
     
    Where did you get that? No-Shit? magazine?

    Don’t worry; the humans will off themselves one way or another.
  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • Billy Joel was off by a decade or so, but still… he sang this one at Madison Square Garden (Nazi territory) 45 years ago:

    I’ve seen the lights go out on Broadway.
    I saw the Empire State laid low.
    And life went on beyond the Palisades.
    They all bought Cadillacs and left there long ago.

    They held a concert out in Brooklyn
    to watch the Island bridges blow.
    They turned our power down,
    and drove us underground,
    but we went right on with the show (Oh, oh, oh)

    I’ve seen the lights go out on Broadway
    I saw the ruins at my feet.
    You know we almost didn’t notice it.
    We’d seen it all the time on 42nd Street.

    They burned the churches up in Harlem
    like in that Spanish Civil War.
    The flames were everywhere,
    but no one really cared.
    It’d always burned up there before (Oh, oh, oh)

    I’ve seen the lights go out on Broadway.
    I watched the mighty skyline fall.
    The boats were waiting at the Battery.
    The union went on strike, they never sailed at all

    They sent a carrier out from Norfolk
    and picked the Yankees up for free.
    They said that Queens could stay,
    they blew the Bronx away
    Aad sank Manhattan out at sea.

    You know those lights were bright on Broadway.
    That was so many years ago.
    Before we all lived here in Florida,
    [Dammit!]
    before the Mafia took over Mexico.

    There are not many who remember.
    They say a handful still survive
    to tell the world about
    the way the lights went out
    and keep the memory alive…

    LIVE MUSIC IS BETTER!!


    Video Link

  • Last week, the vassal governor of Australia Anthony Albanese went to the imperial court in Washington and paid tribute to King Trump in the form of a “landmark deal” for joint mining of Australian rare earth deposits. The goal is to break China’s stranglehold on these critical minerals. Trump, in his indefinite stupidity, immediately declared...
  • @littlereddot
    @antibeast

    They have a superpower. When oppressed, some choose to hide amongst their host populations. Those in Spain who pretended to be Catholics were called the Marranos.

    Replies: @antibeast

    They have a superpower. When oppressed, some choose to hide amongst their host populations.

    The Sephardic Jews fled to England and the Netherlands where they financed the British EIC and the Dutch VOC after being expelled from Catholic Spain. They also settled in New Amsterdam which later became New York in America.

    Those in Spain who pretended to be Catholics were called the Marranos.

    Forced to convert to Catholicism, the Marranos fled to Latin America where they settled and continued to practice their Jewish religion in secret while outwardly living a Catholic lifestyle.

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • Rep. Brandon Gill had filed Articles of Impeachment against Judge James Boasberg, the DC Circuit Court judge who has really made a name for himself.

    Video Link

    US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has upheld a ban on possessing guns in parks, while completely misunderstanding basic principles of law.

    Video Link
    https://twitter.com/opensrcdefense/status/1983953017960591450
    https://twitter.com/BearingArmsCom/status/1986222014596571550
    https://twitter.com/BearingArmsCom/status/1986176712929853809
    https://twitter.com/BearingArmsCom/status/1986086127481024779
    https://twitter.com/BearingArmsCom/status/1986071032466194734

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • Not sure what the plans for ChatGPT are. But I can put a reasonably high probability on it. Look at all these managers they got from facebook.

  • The other day, waiting for a connecting flight in Porto, Portugal, I decided to visit the old city center. Stopping for a coffee in a local cafe, I was surprised to be attended by personnel addressing me in American English, despite my placing the order in Portuguese, though with a Brazilian accent. As my ears...
  • @Avery
    @Tiptoethrutulips

    You are asking too many questions.

    What was done to Slavic peoples -- particularly Russians -- by Nazi Germans has been debated by both our (anti-Hitler/anti-Nazi) and your (pro-Hitler/pro-Nazi) sides for hundreds and hundreds of posts over many years and many threads at @UNZ.com.

    I have also given several examples of the irrational, visceral hatred today's Germans exhibit towards Russians.
    There is no Stalin.
    There is no USSR.

    Yet German leaders today are practically foaming at the mouth braying for war against Russia. Russians have done nothing to Germany, but been friendly since the dissolution of USSR. Opened their markets to high end German machinery; sold them high quality natural gas at very competitive prices.

    Yet Germany is participating/enabling in attacks on ethnic Russians and Russia.
    Participating/enabling in the killings of Russian soldiers and murder of Russian civilians.

    Nothing new to discuss.

    Replies: @HdC

    Germany is still an occupied country; the numerous American and British military bases show this to be so. Consequently the German government is forced to dance to the tune of the occupiers: The murderous and war mongering Brits and Yanks.

    The German populace left to its own would have peace with everyone; well, the murderous Zionists excluded.

    To this date Germany was and is the most peaceful country in Europe.

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes: Video and transcript Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes has gotten considerable coverage in the media, e.g., “Tucker Carlson discusses ‘these Zionist Jews’ with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes in The Times of Israel” and “Heritage Foundation president stands by Tucker Carlson after host platforms antisemitism” in the Jewish Telegraph Agency....
  • @Thomasina
    @JPS

    "But did you ever believe most Americans really want to be good."

    I think most actually do want to be good. They're looking for a leader to lead them there. The problem with most Americans is that they were bent and molded (by parents, by the school system) until they complied, followed the rules and kept their mouths shut. They couldn't fight or run away; they had to go along. They developed pleasing personalities and went along so they weren't shunned.

    "In psychology, to "fawn" is to engage in a trauma response that involves people-pleasing and appeasing others to avoid conflict and ensure safety. It is a survival mechanism often learned in childhood, where a person becomes overly accommodating and compliant to placate a perceived threat. Unlike a conscious choice, fawning is an automatic, subconscious behavior that can lead to abandoning one's own needs and maintaining unhealthy relationships.

    Characteristics of the fawn response:

    People-pleasing: Acting overly agreeable and helpful to gain approval and avoid upsetting others.

    Appeasement: Making oneself appealing to a threat by surrendering boundaries and over-accommodating to avoid conflict.

    Difficulty with boundaries: Having trouble saying "no" or setting and maintaining healthy boundaries.

    People-first orientation: Prioritizing others' needs above your own and taking responsibility for their emotions.

    Fear-based decision-making: Making choices based on what others want rather than what you truly need.

    Origin and impact:

    Trauma response: The fawn response is a reaction to chronic stress and trauma, particularly in childhood, where a child may have used it to avoid abuse.

    Part of fight, flight, freeze, fawn: It is the fourth stress response, alongside fight (aggression), flight (escape), and freeze (immobility).

    Long-term effects: While it can be a useful survival tactic in the short term, fawning can lead to an inability to form genuine connections, a loss of self, and ongoing feelings of being unseen and unheard in adult life."

    Loss of self - heck, a self that never formed to begin with. No voice. The Jews taught their children to fight by giving them an enemy, making them believe they were victims. They speak up because they've been fed the belief that they've been unjustly persecuted for centuries. Fight mode. Big difference.

    Replies: @Liosnagcat, @Thrallman, @Jackabond

    Great comment.

    You said:

    I think most actually do want to be good. They’re looking for a leader to lead them there.

    So, in reality, most people want to be led, which means they can just as easily be led astray as be led to do good.

    This is something (((they))) figured out a long time ago.

  • The old comfortable world is not coming back. The young – if anything – are much more radical. U.S. foreign policy, drenched in the hubris that the U.S. won the Cold War militarily (in Afghanistan); won it economically (liberal markets); and culturally too, (Hollywood) — and therefore rightly deserves, as Trump puts it, the “fun”...
  • AnoN[373] • Disclaimer says:
    @WJ
    @AnoN

    The filibuster is a senate issue. A fact this liberal hub dumbass fails to grasp. Its a dem shutdown . Health care for illegals matters more to them than anything else, especially white people

    Replies: @AnoN

    Health care for illegals matters more to them than anything else, especially white people

    This is a typical response of a Trump supporter, an emperor who has NO BRAIN.
    Thank God Mamdani won the mayor seat in the Jewish state of New York. Do you, like your emperor, think that Mamdani is an immigrant who uses the healthcare system illegally, like your emperor with NO brain? racists, racists, and racists. US must get out of the West Asia, Venezuela, Africa, Central Asia now or face a kick in the ass. You and your terrorist soldiers have migrated around the world in many countries, destroying other nations for your interest including your savage
    DOG Israel. You are not in a position to talk about immigrants. You are immigrants to most of the countries on the planet. Tell your brainless emperor to get out fast. How did you capture Americas? You are invaders telling Mexicans not to come to their own land in California, Arizona, Texas and many other cities. Educate your gullible emperor.

  • I wrote about the coming Trump and Xi meeting in South Korea a week ago and predicted the meeting, while likely outwardly friendly, will be a nothing burger in substance and long-term impact. They met a few days ago and the result is very much as expected. Progress was made, mainly in transactional areas such...
  • @tamo
    @QCIC

    You said "The Asia Times article is nice and the large number of recent Chinese patents is certainly impressive. I would think the author could be troubled to specifically point out 10 of the more impactful Chinese inventions or patents of the past 25 years.".

    I have a BETTER indicator for PRESENT scientific and technological strength of a nation, the Nature Index.

    Nature Index objectively measures the scientific output of institutions and countries, taking into account differences in QUALITY. Therefore, only TOP science research papers
    published in 82 HIGH-QUALITY selected science journals are counted.

    Also you should realize a lot of ethnic Chinese scientists write their research papers under the flag of the U.S.

    According to the Nature Iature Index 2024 Research Leaders: Chinese institutions dominate the TOP 7 spots out of the leading 10 institutions including the FIRST SPOT in 2024, while STANFORD University DROPS out of the TOP ranks for the FIRST TIME and it was REPLACED by Chinese Zhejiang Universty.
    It looks like China in 2024 did better than in 2023 when China had the TOP 6 spots including the FIRST spot.

    Ranking for 2024

    Rank Institution Country Share 2023 Count 2023 Change in adjusted Share 2022–23 (%)
    1 Chinese Academy of Sciences China 2,243.22 7,554 6.30%

    2 Harvard University United States of America 1,143.43 3,763 -3.10%

    3 Max Planck Society Germany 642.83 2,572 -8.90%

    4 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences China 635.81 3,227 5.20%

    5 University of Science and Technology of China China 631.20 1,858 6.70%

    6 Peking University China 617.17 2,349 8.80%

    7 French National Centre for Scientific Research France 613.90 4,400 -0.70%

    8 Nanjing University China 609.45 1,448 6.80%

    9 Zhejiang University China 595.37 1,540 23.10%

    10 Tsinghua University China 593.45 1,946 11.20%

    It looks like China did better than in 2023 when China

    Out of the TOP 10, China has 7

    So China had TOP 7 spots including the FIRST spot and the U.S. had ONLY 1 spot.

    2024 Scientific Research Leading countries

    Country Share 2022 Share 2023 Count 2023 Change in Adjusted Share* 2022–2023
    1 China 20221.23 23171.84 27736 13.6%
    2 United States of America (USA) 21659.11 20291.79 29165 -7.1%
    3 Germany 4595.78 4318.68 9347 -6.8%
    4 United Kingdom (UK) 3996.23 3701.98 8880 -8.2%
    5 Japan 2981.73 2956.75 5161 -1.7%
    6 France 2335.57 2243.92 5453 -4.8%
    7 Canada 1817.12 1702.32 4239 -7.1%
    8 South Korea 1644.45 1631.02 2777 -1.7%
    9 India 1293.46 1494.27 2334 14.5%
    10 Switzerland 1429.16 1393.22 3694 -3.4%

    These are all the combiened TOP research papers of universities, goverment and private research organizations in a country.. In 2024, China’s TOP research output went UP by 13.6% but American research output went DOWN by 7.1%. The gap is growing every year.
    You should remember that huge numbers of so-called American science reseaechers are actually Chinese working for American research institutions and universities.

    Here is what Nature Index said:

    “The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) — the world’s LARGEST scientific organization, comprising more than 100 institutes across China — is PEERLESS in its scale, something reflected in its Share, a metric that measures the contribution of countries, territories and institutions to papers in the Nature Index database.
    At 2,243.22, CAS’s Share for the 2023 calendar year is almost DOUBLE that of HarvardUniversity (1,143.43).

    It’s not only Nature Index that indicates China’s supremacy in TOP science researches.

    Accoding to Australian Strategic Policy Institute,
    “China’s global lead extends to 37 out of 44 technologies that ASPI is now tracking, covering a range of crucial technology fields spanning defence, space, robotics, energy, the environment, biotechnology, artificial intelligence (AI), advanced materials and key quantum technology areas.”

    Replies: @QCIC

    Why is it so hard to list some of the actual innovations? The Nature index is great and a lot of nice work is surely being completed in China, apparently more than the rest of the world combined. This was expected by HBD aficionados at the Unz Review such as Anatoly Karlin based on the average IQ and population numbers in China. It is nice to see this confirmed, but not surprising.

    If you look around online I am sure you can find something from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and similar organizations in various fields of investigation which list the top 100 Chinese innovations of the 21st century. Often these types of lists have useful descriptions of the work, intended for intelligent and educated non-specialists, which give the context, existing knowledge prior to the work and what is novel about the innovation. I still believe you will be pleased when you get around to doing this homework and posting such results. By “pleased” I mean really insufferable, but that’s OK because it would be nice for everyone to know more about the innovations. I am equally interested in the same sort of information for India, Russia and everywhere else but there seems to be a lot more going on in China so let’s start there.

    • Replies: @tamo
    @QCIC

    Since you are SO MUCH interested in finding out Chinese scientific achievements, why don't you google the latest Chinese scientific and technological breakthroughs and innonvations? I know there are a lot of them. Do the search, it will do you good !!!

  • Are China-Russia – and a great deal of the Global Majority – really ready? Call it an auspicious vow. Close the door, put out the light You know they won’t be home tonight The snow falls hard and don’t you know The winds of Thor are blowing cold Led Zeppelin, No Quarter In a matter...
  • “Satan II” – if you liked the Prince of Darkness in his feature debut, you’ll love the sequel!

  • The old comfortable world is not coming back. The young – if anything – are much more radical. U.S. foreign policy, drenched in the hubris that the U.S. won the Cold War militarily (in Afghanistan); won it economically (liberal markets); and culturally too, (Hollywood) — and therefore rightly deserves, as Trump puts it, the “fun”...
  • @Gerbils
    @Bama


    This business of Jewish banker and oligarch control of China, Japan or the Koreas is mostly chatter. They are trying desperately to do in the Far East what they did in the West. Only when they are able to change the mix with wholesale immigration will there be proof.
     
    Jews had complete control of Mao. They still control the import/export banks taking a % of everything that comes and goes. My money is on the Han Chinese for the long run tho.

    Replies: @antibeast

    Jews had complete control of Mao. They still control the import/export banks taking a % of everything that comes and goes.

    So the Jews had complete control of Mao? This is what Mao wrote of Israel:

    Palestine took on increasing importance to China’s foreign policy objectives not only because of their struggle against imperialism, but because of Israel’s role as an outpost of the West. When Ahmad Shuqairi, Yasser Arafat’s predecessor, visited Beijing in 1965, Mao Zedong framed the Palestinian struggle in terms of a worldwide struggle against imperialism and for the liberation of Asia. Taiwan and Israel were both, in Mao’s view, proxies of the United States, and therefore the defeat of both were essential to the independence of Asia:

    Imperialism is afraid of China and of the Arabs. Israel and Formosa are bases of imperialism in Asia. You are the front gate of the great continent, and we are the rear. Their goal is the same. . . Asia is the biggest continent in the world, and the West wants to continue exploiting it. The West does not like us, and we must understand this fact. The Arab battle against the West is the battle against Israel. So boycott Europe and America, O Arabs!

    And Mao was a Zionist puppet?

    Shuqairi’s delegation to China arrived in Beijing on March 17th, where he met Zhou Enlai for the first time since the Bandung Conference ten years prior. This time, their meeting would result in military aid in addition to rhetorical and diplomatic support. According to Shuqairi’s memoirs, Zhou Enlai promised free small-arms shipments to be routed through Egypt. The Soviet Union may have supported Nasser, but did not provide material aid to the PLO and backed the land-for-peace framework of U.N. resolution 242, which the Beijing review denounced as “humiliating.”

    As the only major power willing to support the PLO, China’s aid was a significant factor in the PLO’s ability to establish itself as the de facto leader of the Palestinian national liberation movement. Israeli intelligence estimates that Chinese arms shipments to various PLO factions totaled $5 million, or $33 million adjusted for inflation, and included small arms and training for PLO officers in a military academy in Nanning.

    SOURCE:

    https://cosmonautmag.com/2024/02/sino-palestinian-relations-from-anti-imperialist-solidarity-to-pragmatism/

  • What would you say if I told you that if there is even a 1% chance that Dick Cheney didn’t really die, we must consider his non-death a 100% certainly, track down his undead corpse, pound his heart full of stakes, and shoot him full of silver bullets? Anyone who actually carried out that plan...
  • @MEexpert
    Dick Cheney.......the most evil person. Compared to him Hitler seems like a gentleman.

    Replies: @Tennessee Jed

    Hitler was a gentleman.

  • The other day, waiting for a connecting flight in Porto, Portugal, I decided to visit the old city center. Stopping for a coffee in a local cafe, I was surprised to be attended by personnel addressing me in American English, despite my placing the order in Portuguese, though with a Brazilian accent. As my ears...
  • @tolkin
    @Incitatus

    This is so funny and wonderfully tongue-in-cheek! Congratulations.

    The German commentators are living up to their stereotype perfectly.

    It brings to mind that popular joke: 'Humor in Germany is no laughing matter.' :)

    A nation without a sense of humor and self-distance, one that considers itself great, is in fact a very small nation.

    Replies: @HdC

    Better a small nation with great ability than the opposite where you are, ie. a great nation (possibly) with no ability to improve the human condition.

    • Replies: @tolkin
    @HdC

    You improve the human condition by putting people in graves.

    Ten million of your own and seventy million other Europeans, just 80 years ago.

    You improved the human condition of the Western Slavs by annihilating most of them.

    You improved the human condition of the Old Prussians by exterminating them and stealing their very name.

    You improved the human condition of the Polish intelligentsia by executing them.

    Just to name a few...

    Why don't you keep your "great abilities" to yourselves!

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @vinteuil
    @John Johnson


    There is some story where [Dick Cheney] took an entrance exam to a private college. The college examiner was looking over his test results and asked: Just how smart are you Dick?

    He looked up and said….fuckin’ smart.

    Love or hate him the guy was a character.
     
    I.e., Dick Cheney was JJ's kind of a Republican.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666

    Dick Cheney was JJ’s kind of a Republican.

    Not True! Cheney was a “Peacekeeper.” National Review says so. Apparently, his great achievement was keeping dumb Americans from getting a peace dividend when the Soviet Union collapsed, and instead laying the groundwork for the current war in Ukraine. Heckuva job, Dick.

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/11/dick-cheney-peacekeeper/

  • I wrote about the coming Trump and Xi meeting in South Korea a week ago and predicted the meeting, while likely outwardly friendly, will be a nothing burger in substance and long-term impact. They met a few days ago and the result is very much as expected. Progress was made, mainly in transactional areas such...
  • @Vidi
    @QCIC


    The Asia Times article is nice and the large number of recent Chinese patents is certainly impressive. I would think the author could be troubled to specifically point out 10 of the more impactful Chinese inventions or patents of the past 25 years.
     
    How about Charles Kao, whose invention of fiber optics was considered so significant that he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2009?

    You may object that he did his work in England, so perhaps his invention was not really Chinese. However, Kao was born in Shanghai. And when he made his invention, China was still one of the poorest countries on Earth. My point is that China is becoming richer; as the country's living standards approach the First World's, more and more Chinese of Kao's caliber will appear. So brace yourself for a tidal wave of Chinese innovation in the next few decades.

    Replies: @QCIC

    Great! This is nice example.

  • Are China-Russia – and a great deal of the Global Majority – really ready? Call it an auspicious vow. Close the door, put out the light You know they won’t be home tonight The snow falls hard and don’t you know The winds of Thor are blowing cold Led Zeppelin, No Quarter In a matter...
  • @Mr. Crowley

    Are China-Russia really ready?
     
    Lol

    Only problem is, China-Russia are governed by the same global cabal of Jewish-Commie owned/controlled central banks/corporations as the NATO nations. They're both anti-white agents of techno-Communism. Its similar to the setup in Orwell's 1984, where the major superpowers pretend they're autonomous entities & 'enemies', but are actually one great synchronized geopolitical system designed to terrorize, enslave & liquidate their subjects via various means.

    Replies: @Tennessee Jed

    What are the names of the Jewish-Commie banks/corporations that control China?

  • Well, the latest of these incessant polls concerning the Nov. 4 election for the mayoralty of New York are in, having arrived Thursday, Oct. 30, and if the story has changed it is only for the better. A new Emerson College survey puts Zohran Mamdani, front runner from the start, 25 percentage points ahead of...
  • @JesusWasAGayJew

    America is a very special and wonderful nation. We must pull together to protect our nation, our way of life. Life, liberty, and freedom....Ours is a unique nation. Ours is a special nation.
     
    Ummm...you need to learn how to read a room.

    The majority of TUR posters don't think you belong here. AT ALL.

    When you use words like 'we' and 'our', they are rolling their eyes. They're thinking, "there is no 'we'.

    Donald Trump has done the US a enormous service by giving people permission to publicly and unashamedly express their racist, bigoted, authoritarian, retrograde tendencies. These sentiments were always there, simmering beneath the surface. But now they're out in the open for all to behold. And the people in this group are a HUGE chunk of the population.

    The fact is that America is, to be sure, a 'very special and wonderful nation'...on paper. In reality, it's a nation of mouth-breathing, retarded imbeciles who don't deserve the gift they've been given by the framers of the US Constitution.

    A 'very special and wonderful nation' would never elect a moronic orange douchebag pedophile like Trump to the presidency. And it's not like this was some sort of surprise. They fucking elected him AGAIN after seeing what an unmitigated pile of excrement he was the first time round.

    Replies: @JunkyardDog, @DeDoc

    So, you love niggers and sandniggers? LOL. Spoken like a true cuck for the shyteskins.

  • The other day, waiting for a connecting flight in Porto, Portugal, I decided to visit the old city center. Stopping for a coffee in a local cafe, I was surprised to be attended by personnel addressing me in American English, despite my placing the order in Portuguese, though with a Brazilian accent. As my ears...
  • @Avery
    @HdC

    {another intellectually deficient individual}

    Stop boasting about yourself, panzerjugend retard: we don't care how stupid you are: it's a given. We already know.

    btw: aren't you the Hitlerite poster who in another thread, when I asked why did Hitler invade Greece -- which had done nothing to Nazi Germany -- and killed and murdered ~15,000 Greek troops and ~20,000 Greek civilians: you replied:

    “It was a military necessity”.

    You genocidal hitlerjugend scum.

    Replies: @HdC

    Listen mental midget: Britain was planning to invade Europe by going through Greece.

    Greece was overrun with partisan fighters which cost the Germans dearly; fine you say, but then face the consequences of reprisals without your synthetic outrage and crocodile tears.

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Hypnotoad666


    causing a building to free fall into its own footprint
     
    You cite the above with doubt. Are you suggesting that a collapsing skyscraper normally would not generally “fall into its own footprint”? I mean, it would be weird if didn’t: Should the Twin Towers instead have bounced around like giant Slinkys before diving into the Hudson and swimming up river or something?

    I’ve never seen such pig-headed, ignorant comments on this site as the ones claiming that “Trutherism” is wrong by definition and that Israel and the Deep State therefore dindu nuthin’.
     
    Dunno about the rest of the site, but in this iSteve thread I haven’t seen anyone claim “Israel and the Deep State therefore dindu nuthin’.” If you have a beef in threads outside of iSteve, maybe go deal with it there.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666

    I haven’t seen anyone claim “Israel and the Deep State therefore dindu nuthin’.”

    Anyone who ignores facts because he believes “9/11 Trutherism” is automatically ‘horseshit” is making exactly that claim. Maybe you didn’t see their replies to me up the thread but Mr. Anon and Intelligent (sic) Daesin are making exactly such Grade-A level retard assertions.

    I didn’t mean to necessarily paint you with the same brush. Your posts were merely annoying examples of Sealioning (a term which I learned on this thread about an hour ago).

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Hypnotoad666


    Anyone who ignores facts because he believes “9/11 Trutherism” is automatically ‘horseshit” is making exactly that claim.
     
    Your ardent ‘cause’ may be better served if you separate the physical destruction theories from the whodunnit / cui bono theories. You often conflate the two categories, which looks like your stated suspicions of ‘whodunnit’ necessarily rely on a theory that a “controlled demolition” happened, causing you to engage in confirmation bias to shore up your ‘whodunnit’ assertions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

    Here’s how you can convince the skeptics in two main steps, in a necessary sequence (i.e., step two will be moot if you can’t convince skeptics of the first part):

    First, concentrate solely on the covert physical destruction (i.e., disguised-method demolition) theory, citing evidence (using quotes) from non-crank sources. Once you’ve turned the ‘demolition’ skeptics to your side, then:

    Second, having convinced your skeptics that a covert demolition action occurred, concentrate solely on the whodunnit theory: Provide citations from non-crank sources that whoever covertly demolished the Twin Towers and/or WTC 7 had the operational ability to do so, and indeed had personnel in place at some point to plan, prep, and execute the sleight-of-hand operation. This would require providing names and ranks/titles of the actual operators who prepped the building(s), and were in the chain of command leading up to and on the day of the attack.

    If you’re not able to do any of the above, you’re gonna stay mad. :(

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes: Video and transcript Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes has gotten considerable coverage in the media, e.g., “Tucker Carlson discusses ‘these Zionist Jews’ with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes in The Times of Israel” and “Heritage Foundation president stands by Tucker Carlson after host platforms antisemitism” in the Jewish Telegraph Agency....
  • @notanonymoushere
    That was a long article. My parents had a policy: if masturbation takes more than 15 minutes you're doing it wrong. And yes, if you're not timing your child's masturbation sessions you are a bad parent.

    Replies: @Angharad, @24th Alabama, @Same old same old

    You are as sick as your parents, JEW

  • The Israel lobby stays winning.

    Fuentes is the Baal Shem Tov’s frog.

    🙂

  • This “heresay” is one such belief, and it has been promoted by Jewish activists like Felix Untermeyer who was instrumental in getting the Scofield Bible, the basis of Christian Zionism, published by Oxford University Press in 1909.

    I think you meant “heresy” and Samuel Untermyer.

  • Most Zohran Mamdani voters loathe Nick Fuentes. Fuentes’ groypers aren’t big fans of Mamdani, either. But if “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” the two no-longer-marginalized figures, and their followers, ought to be friends. Mamdani’s election as mayor of New York, and Fuentes’ almost simultaneous entry into the mainstream conversation, are not unrelated....
  • LOL! Once again Fag Kevin gets all hot and bothered over a muslime being elected to U.S. office.

    • Agree: Angharad
    • Replies: @David Parker
    @DeDoc

    Muslims are as bad as Jews. American is fundamentally Christian with Christian ethics which means the habitual lying and opportunistic Jews and Muslims are fatal to what made America great and good when American was great and good, pre-federal reserve system and pre-Roosevelt's Spanish-American War and empire and manipulation into serving Jew destruction-of-culture wars overseas.

  • Isn’t Islam inherently violent? What stopped the Islamic world having an Enlightenment? Why are some Muslims so into head-chopping? And isn’t Hamas the same as Islamic State? A recent conversation with a friend highlighted to me how little most westerners know about Islam, and how they struggle to distinguish between Islam and Islamism. This lack...
  • @A123
    @Tennessee Jed

    ROTFL -- How often did you disappoint your teachers in Taqiyya Troll training? You desperately need to return to Tehran for extensive remedial work.

    Accusing a Christian, such as myself, of being a Jewish is an obvious failure on your part. Your attempt was so retarded, everyone saw it immediately collapse. Anyone who makes such a pathetic charge must be so indoctrinated that they cannot tell Judeo-Christians apart.

    You are not Christian.
    You are not Jewish.
    You serve the Anti-Christ Muhammad.

    If you are not a Muslim, why do you simp for the evil of your Satan/Allah/Lucifer?

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Tennessee Jed

    You did it again, everyone is a muslim, lol. Moshe, you’re a real pisser.

  • During the early 1990s Germar Rudolf was a young chemist employed at Germany's prestigious Max Planck Institute with a bright future ahead of him. But then he was hired to conduct a chemical analysis of the walls of the Auschwitz concentration camp. One thing led to another and he spent the next thirty-odd years suffering...
  • @Odyssey
    I think that recommending Rezun's book is a mistake and only hubris prevents someone from admitting it. It is incredible that several years were spent on it and that it has been reprinted here (in the form of Wier's quotes from his own book, which is almost a reprint of Rezun's) more than a dozen times.

    We always received suggestions to read that book instead of directly crossing the arguments as their own, even if they were taken from Rezun or anyone else. Thus we come to the conclusion that the circulation of Rezun's book in English or other languages ​​determines the truthfulness of the causes of the start of WW2. The paradox is that it is simultaneously an unknown book and a best-selling book by a military historian.

    I think the general conclusion (with 2-3 exceptions) is that Rezun's key arguments about the F1 and amphibious tanks are completely nonsense, although this does not lack a humorous component. The cited data on the number of tanks as an indicator of the intention to carry out aggression are also meaningless when considering the length of the potential front (from Finland to the Black Sea) that would have to be defended in the event of aggression.

    Kingsmeg's comparisons are indicative, as is the lack of a real motive for an attack by the Soviet Union. Analogously, now it could be considered that Russia, which has the Burevestnik, Poseidon and Oresnik, superior weapons that the West does not have, is preparing to attack Europe and the US. So, it should be preempted, which is indeed what the cocaine trio led by Germany again, really thinks at this moment.

    Not a single piece of evidence is presented of a political decision, discussion, intention, logistical preparations, preparatory propaganda to the broad masses about the necessity of attacking and conquering all of Europe, projections of who would be the opponent (e.g. the US, Japan) in the event of an attack on Europe, etc.

    It is also frivolous that Gulag prisoners were prepared to be military/civilian administrators in European states (incidentally, relevant to the other text, the old Serbian name for that position is 'karan(os)' which was the title of the founder of Alexander's dynasty in 814 BC, i.e. 500 years before him). It should be known that a small percentage of them were criminals, and the vast majority were ordinary, innocent people, falsely accused of being opponents of the socialist revolution.

    I think that persisting in this thesis and siding with a group of one-sided groupthink specimens of modest mental stature (although Laurent seems to be there, too) and also persistently avoiding mentioning Lebensraum and Directive 21, has damaged and unnecessarily compromised this blog, so with this I am ending what I perceived as a personal attack on my intelligence and what I considered unfinished business.

    Replies: @notanonymoushere

    I think that persisting in this thesis and siding with a group of one-sided groupthink specimens of modest mental stature (although Laurent seems to be there, too) and also persistently avoiding mentioning Lebensraum and Directive 21, has damaged and unnecessarily compromised this blog, so with this I am ending what I perceived as a personal attack on my intelligence and what I considered unfinished business.

    Is that typical of homosexuals? Because I really like Freddy Mercury and Liberace but you seem like a huge douche.

  • Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes: Video and transcript Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes has gotten considerable coverage in the media, e.g., “Tucker Carlson discusses ‘these Zionist Jews’ with avowed antisemite Nick Fuentes in The Times of Israel” and “Heritage Foundation president stands by Tucker Carlson after host platforms antisemitism” in the Jewish Telegraph Agency....
  • @zimriel
    re "the question of why so many White people succumb to anti-White ideologies and blind support of Israel is critical"
    I assume MacDonald is aware of Yoram Reuben Hazony. Hazony argues for support of Israel because it has a pro-White mission.
    Also: the Gaza operation was not a "genocide". Ethnic-cleansing as defined by the Serbs was not a genocide either. The Kosovar sort of Albanian existed then in... northern Albania, upon which the Serbs made no claim. We can certainly say that the Serbs were injust in cleansing Kosovo, which was Albanian long before the Slavic language was ever heard in Kosovo.
    I don't know we can say that for Gaza which was a Canaani city during the Bronze Age, Arabic at that time never being heard in Gaza. It was, however, heard in western Arabia, where I believe it may be heard today. "Your inheritance is the desert", as Sebeos quoted Heraclius in the 620s.

    Replies: @24th Alabama

    South Slavic was the primary language spoken
    in Kosovo in the year 1,000 AD.

    You wanna play dueling AI’s?

  • @RestiveUs
    @Mr. Crowley


    Both of them remind me of some sleazy phony conman or actors playing some scripted role for the alt-rightards.
     
    ...And you remind me of a troll. Always the first to post. Always trying to confound the issue.

    Replies: @Dr. Krieger, @Brazilian Brainrot

    I think he may be a new type of hasbara troll to go with “Vibe Shift”. Cartoonishly anti-semetic.

    I smell a rat.

  • Isn’t Islam inherently violent? What stopped the Islamic world having an Enlightenment? Why are some Muslims so into head-chopping? And isn’t Hamas the same as Islamic State? A recent conversation with a friend highlighted to me how little most westerners know about Islam, and how they struggle to distinguish between Islam and Islamism. This lack...
  • @Tennessee Jed
    @A123

    How many times did you fail the "Conversational English" course during your unit 8200 training? Nice try Moshe but calling everyone a muslim and the "turn away from Islam" routine is predictable and tiresome. Maybe you Jameson and meamjojo can put your heads together and come up with a new catch phrase.

    Replies: @A123, @muh muh

    Maybe you Jameson and meamjojo can put your heads together and come up with a new catch phrase.

    I’d envision Moe, Larry, and Curly simultaneously headbutting each other in a brainstorming huddle, but I’d rather not offend the dignity of the stooges. 🕶️

    • LOL: Tennessee Jed
    • Replies: @Tennessee Jed
    @muh muh

    It seems jew morons come in sets of three.

  • And this is why we can't have nice things. Even in one of the Whitest states in America, 94 percent White New Hampshire, the New York Times noted how can the entire state diversify itself back in 2018 article. Well, by having a White Republican state legislator call for pulling down the oldest statue to...
  • Well, more than likely the wetbacks will be next screaming to tear down a White historical statue for one of pancho villa as they worked to get this rat-faced chopper jockey elected in NJ-

    https://nypost.com/2025/11/05/us-news/nj-hispanic-latino-voters-swung-sharply-to-mikie-sherrill-wiping-out-2024-gop-gains-data-shows/

  • Following the death of Charlie Kirk, all sorts of weird things are going on. It has “rallied the MAGA base” in a depraved manner, similar to the way the nation was rallied after 9/11. Clearly, this was intended by the administration, which has worked with all of these “alternative media influencers,” to stoke the hysteria....
  • @notonx
    @Eric135

    The post is continued from a thread as I stated clearly. The first is quoted in the Grayzone article; the second you can hear him say it on Alex Jones. Links to both are in the upthread.

    I was swept up in the hype and did listen to his podcasts for several months. When I say “Fuentes said on his podcast”, I mean: I recall from the months I listened to his podcast “...”. Sometimes, I leave out the wordiness.

    Videos of his podcasts are typically five hours long with no description beyond a short title, hence extremely difficult for any individual to try looking for certain contents even when one knows the episode.

    In contrast, Team Fuentes is powerful with seemingly unlimited resources, including AI behind the paywall. It should be very easy for you guys to provide links to clarify your vague statements.

    So if you say Fuentes did not claim he was cancelled since age 18, then please tell us what jobs he had ever held, tell us how he explained his employment history.

    B.t.w., didn't he leave Boston University without a degree? Please tell us what happened.

    Replies: @Eric135

    Still waiting for the links.

  • Note to the reader: The debate will proceed as follows: I (JEA) will first summarize key points of tension and outline some of the central issues, after which James Fetzer will respond. A second installment—published later, which may be considered the rebuttal period—will follow the same format. JEA: Following the publication of my article on...
  • @Laurent Guyénot
    @Jonas E. Alexis

    Thanks Jonas for responding to my comment. When I say that “Christianity gave birth to Darwin”, I'm making a shortcut. What I do believe is that Christianity gave birth to atheism. More precisely, the Abrahamic picture of God as a talking individual discredited the idea of God in the mind of rational people, and Stoic cosmotheism was no more there to give them a different way to think of the divine. This idea would need to be developed, but I think it is something that many atheists can relate to. If they think deeply about it, they can recognize that they threw the baby with the bathwater.
    As for Intelligent Design, my comment was a bit too short. In fact, I'm absolutely convinced by Intelligent Design (having read a few of its best apologists). But I was also interested in Sheldrake's critic, although not totally convinced by it. Sheldrake is a dynamic platonist, who doesn't think of the Cosmic Intelligence as a Creator, but more as a creating process. That makes little difference, really.
    I take notes of the two books your recommend.
    And I never thought you suggested that “the important debate is between Christianity and Darwinism.” I just wanted to say that this is what most people in the West take for granted, and that’s the first problem that generally prevents a constructive discussion. Christianity should be kept out of the debate totally.
    Best

    Replies: @Jonas E. Alexis

    Thank you for joining the discussion again. With respect, I must say that this strikes me as the most unusual form of atheism I have ever encountered—a kind of “village atheism,” so to speak. I am not aware of any serious thinker who would suggest or imply, as you do, that Christianity hinges entirely on “the Abrahamic picture of God as a talking individual.” Even prominent atheists such as Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, the late Christopher Hitchens, George H. Smith, Paul Kurtz, J. L. Mackie, among others, would not approach the critique of a religion as historically and philosophically rich as Christianity in this way. Thinkers long before us have wrestled with these questions.

    You also seem to suggest that only “rational people” are atheists, which overlooks a vast body of twentieth-century scholarship. Consider figures such as Mortimer Adler, Richard Swinburne, Jacques Maritain, Étienne Gilson, and Alvin Plantinga—are they all irrational? A fruitful engagement with just a small fraction of the literature from the past fifty years might help clarify these issues: Alvin Plantinga, God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God (New York: Cornell University Press, 1990); Warranted and Proper Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993); Warranted Christian Belief (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000); Peter van Inwagen, The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008); Richard Swinburne, The Existence of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979); William Lane Craig and Quentin Smith, Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995). This is only a small sample of the extensive work produced over the last fifty years.

    If you are willing to take up the challenge, we could explore these issues in a structured debate and make the discussion publicly available. Let me know if you are interested.

    By the way, have you had a chance to read my three articles which provided a critique of From Yahweh to Zion? With all due respect, I must emphasize that I find this book to be riddled with historical inaccuracies and permeated by confirmation bias, while serious scholarly studies that contradict its conclusions have been largely ignored. I have addressed these issues extensively in the three articles I have written in response to your work.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    @Jonas E. Alexis

    I would add Dr. CS. Lewis "Personal Heresy" and " Dr. Francis Schaeffer, The Church Before the Watching World"


    Some other references

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvnTnC9ldZs


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyxUwaq00Rc


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXexaVsvhCM

    , @Laurent Guyénot
    @Jonas E. Alexis

    Dear Jonas,
    You say "You also seem to suggest that only “rational people” are atheists" and then cite people who are rational yet christians. But "only rational people are atheists" and "some rational people are not atheist" do not contradict each other. I hope you realize this.
    But anyway, this is not what I am suggesting. I am rational and definitely not an atheist.
    I now remember reading your article, which I went through again. But I found only this one: https://vtforeignpolicy.com/2025/02/fatal-flaws-in-laurent-guyenots-from-yahweh-to-zion-and-other-works-a-historical-and-philosophical-analysis/
    Can you link me to the other two?
    I am open to have a structured video conversation with you about the Jewish Question. We could ask Kevin to moderate (and join in) our conversation. Each could start by summarizing as clearly as possible his position, so that there would be less risk of misunderstanding or misrepresenting each other's position. Then the discussion could focus on trying to make arguments for these positions, rather than being sidetracked into irrelevant details or lists of names of people who wrote this or that in the last two centuries.

  • Most Zohran Mamdani voters loathe Nick Fuentes. Fuentes’ groypers aren’t big fans of Mamdani, either. But if “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” the two no-longer-marginalized figures, and their followers, ought to be friends. Mamdani’s election as mayor of New York, and Fuentes’ almost simultaneous entry into the mainstream conversation, are not unrelated....
  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Achmed E. Newman
    @MEH 0910

    You sent me on a 4-level dive through wiki, from this one to Steve Sailer to Unz Review to Ron Unz. I learned ... a little tiny bit. While reading up on Steve Sailer, I ran into this little tidbit:


    Sailer has been described as a white supremacist and white nationalist,[6] including by the Southern Poverty Law Center[23][14] and the Columbia Journalism Review.[5]
     
    See, Loyalty, you're wrong. Ipso wiki factoid, case closed. I mean, it's even got footnotes!

    Do I need this? Fine. [/sarc]

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    If you can’t trust the SPLC who can you trust?

    The whole thing of demanding “sources and citations” for things is kinda funny in itself. I think it’s a bunch of people who took a college 101 course on how to write a paper. So you do all this superficial BS of “proving” your case by citing a bunch of passages in some book. This give you the superficial form of having proven something without any of the substance.

    It’s kind of a text based worldview too. As if these people can’t directly look at reality themselves.

    • Replies: @Pericles
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    Wikipedia can provide some nice cases of citation laundering. I've heard there nowadays might furthermore be some sort of loop there too, where 'editors' silently plead for supportive articles by their media pals. Hopefully Grokipedia will crush them.

    One of the good parts of the reviled peer review, by the way: not seldom do you end up being refereed by the author you're citing, or at least his group. Then you better get it right.

  • Isn’t Islam inherently violent? What stopped the Islamic world having an Enlightenment? Why are some Muslims so into head-chopping? And isn’t Hamas the same as Islamic State? A recent conversation with a friend highlighted to me how little most westerners know about Islam, and how they struggle to distinguish between Islam and Islamism. This lack...
  • The Christians who refused to convert in Antioch were burned to death.

    The earliest Christian sources of information on the loss of Antioch to Muslim forces were Sebeos (~660 CE) and Theophanes the Confessor (758-815 CE), neither of whom corroborate your mythical account.

    Later, Crusade-era chroniclers, such as William of Tyre, were given to exaggeration about the treatment of Christians at the hands of Muslims. Their accounts have since been relegated to the ‘never happened’ file by serious historians.

    Thanks for the opportunity to kick your ass yet again, Dick.

    I could do this all day. 🕶️

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Achmed E. Newman
    I don't know how far this unspellable foreign Moslem Commie will really get with his programmes in NYC, but this kind of thing only hits home when you come home. Watch this scene, and see what I mean, say in my post Bolshevik Zohran Kwame Mamdani on seizing the means of habitation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5ikX1e7TrQ

    You've got to go to the post for Lara's Theme.

    .
    We've got a lot of artiste/literati types here, so I hope many of you will know the reference, having watched or even read Dr. Zhivago.

    Replies: @Currdog73, @Buzz Mohawk, @Mr. Anon, @Pericles

    David Lean ★★★★★

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
  • World War II was the most colossal military conflict in all of human history, and the shaping event of our modern world. As a consequence, over the last eighty years it has become the subject of hundreds of thousands of books and articles written in English, and an equally vast outpouring of electronic media content...
  • I recall significant mentions of the 1916 German peace efforts in the April 1917 debates in Congress over Wilson’s call for a declaration of war. Check the Congressional Record, it’s all there.

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Achmed E. Newman
    I don't know how far this unspellable foreign Moslem Commie will really get with his programmes in NYC, but this kind of thing only hits home when you come home. Watch this scene, and see what I mean, say in my post Bolshevik Zohran Kwame Mamdani on seizing the means of habitation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5ikX1e7TrQ

    You've got to go to the post for Lara's Theme.

    .
    We've got a lot of artiste/literati types here, so I hope many of you will know the reference, having watched or even read Dr. Zhivago.

    Replies: @Currdog73, @Buzz Mohawk, @Mr. Anon, @Pericles

    Always liked”Lara’s Theme”brings back fond memories from watching the movie because the little redhead worked at the theater and I watched a lot of movies waiting for her to get off work.

  • The other day, waiting for a connecting flight in Porto, Portugal, I decided to visit the old city center. Stopping for a coffee in a local cafe, I was surprised to be attended by personnel addressing me in American English, despite my placing the order in Portuguese, though with a Brazilian accent. As my ears...
  • @Colin Wright
    @Wielgus

    It's interesting to consider that it may not have been just Hitler. Around a million ethnic Germans had given up and left Poland for Germany in the interwar era; most in the face of expropriation, open discrimination, etc.

    Obviously -- particularly as a formerly privileged group -- they would have been bitter. Domestic Germans would have been getting the low down on those nasty Poles for a good twenty years. Then too, figures such as Guderian had lost familial estates when Western Poland had been carved out of Prussia.

    This wouldn't have applied to anything like the same extent to any of Hitler's other conquests -- except possibly the Baltic states. My point is that Hitler wasn't some sort of perfect autocrat. Like everyone, he relied on at least partial consensus. If many Germans favored a harsh policy towards Poles in the first place, he would have been that much more inclined to engage in a truly draconian policy there. Who was there in Germany in 1939-45 who actually advocated a 'good neighbor' policy towards the Poles?

    Racial theory aside, it would seem to have been likely to have been quite unlike German attitudes toward the French, Belgians, Dutch, et al. Certainly there should continue to be a France -- just a suitably chastened and submissive one. Poland? Maybe there wasn't to be one at all.

    Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips

    Well, Noodle(s), it’d be interesting to know why you persist in this online circle-jerk with you, yourself, and thy…

    Who was there in Germany in 1939-45 who actually advocated a ‘good neighbor’ policy towards the Poles?

    WHO in Germany advocated a ‘good neighbor’ policy in 1933-1939?

    NOR collaborated with German forces to orchestrate the Easter Pogrom, attacking Jewish homes..

    What’s NOR?

    Post WW1 was a complicated time for most Europeans, Noodle(s). So, it was ultimately Germany causing all the havoc? Where are you getting your info? Wikipedia?

    Vladimir Putin called NS-era Polish ambassador in Berlin, Jósef Lipski, “a bastard and anti-Semitic pig.”

    Edward Rydz-Śmigły said, “If the German remains an adversary, he is not less a European and an homme d’ordre… The Russian is a barbarian, an Asiatic, a corrupt and poisonous element, with which any contact is perilous and any compromise, lethal.”

    Josef Pilsudski signed a treaty with Germany in 1934.

    The Poles were all over the place, sparring with Russia, sparring with Germany, menacing the Lithuanians and parts of Silesia, with France goading and funding them along. And, the ethnic Poles seemed all too happy to jump right on the ausrotten die Juden bandwagon once the Germans had had enough of Jewish/Bolshevik meddling and instigating. Polish “antisemitism” was raging in Poland, after all, and with Germans for cover, why not give way to an opportunity for revenge and reprisal?

    Poland was GUILTY of resenting the status of the Jews in Poland, for no reason whatsoever, and for not doing enough/more for The Jews, a transgression made by everyone else in the world all the time, and that’s why Poland keeps all that direct and original-source evidence buried somewhere at Treblinka with all those corpses than can never be exhumed/verified/identified due to a rather convenient Talmudic law about disturbing burial sites conveniently marked Here Be The Chosen.

    But, way to flop around, Noodle. Wielgus. John Johnson. Anyone else?

    The Inside Story of The Peace Conference
, Dr. E.J. Dillon

    Of all the collectivities whose interests were furthered at the Conference, the Jews had perhaps the most resourceful and certainly the most influential….But the Western Jews, who championed their Eastern brothers, proceeded to demand a further concession which many of their own co-religionists hastened to disclaim as dangerous—a kind of autonomy which Rumanian, Polish, and Russian statesmen, as well as many of their Jewish fellow-subjects, regarded as tantamount to the creation of a state within the state…

    The head of the Polish delegation, Roman Dmowski…appeared at the Conference under all the disadvantages that could be heaped upon a man who has incurred the resentment of the most powerful international body of modern times. He had the misfortune to have the Jews of the world as his adversaries….His ardent nationalist sentiments placed him in antagonism to every movement that ran counter to the progress of his country on nationalist lines….M. Dmowski moves with the national away from the international…The frequency with which the leading spirits of Bolshevism turn out to be Jews…

  •   Imagine you're a Leftist. Upset about illegal immigrants facing the prospect of deportation back to their homelands they are oh-so-proud of being from but oh-so-glad not to be living in currently. You decide to do something about it. On a day when traditionally all the members of the US Supreme Court attend a Catholic...
  • Porn is available on various adult websites for entertainment.

    Always choose safe platforms for a protected experience.

  • You pre-drink appetizer: Bowie, Maryland is 55% black. Washington DC is a short 35 minutes away, and is a 48% black city. Remember this as we present you your shot and chaser. And, it's vital you understand the state of Maryland is 33% black. Okay, how about a shot or two? Ready? Shot. [Six Flags...
  • @Wokechoke
    @Keiser

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9JoPMldI3h0


    Stereotypes exist for very good reasons. Black boys from London v White boys from Como.

    Replies: @getaclue, @Lancelot_Link

    Like many animals, ones that physically mature faster tend to rely on physicality than thought to get by. Growing a surgeon or physicist had to take more input than athletic sperm donor.

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Achmed E. Newman
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Excellent pop song there, Generic! Anyone who can name another Sky High from the very same decade gets big Peak Stupidity kudos (nuts or no nuts).

    To get serious for a moment, I know enough mech. engineering to know that a lot of the Truthers are full of it regarding a lot of things. That doesn't say I know enough to prove anything. (Modeling of high velocity burning Jet-A and a mass of half a million pounds high-speed impact loading with the heat transfer involved is ... not something a Osama bin Laden type would know either.

    I DO know enough about aviation to see the stupidity of some of the claims upon that portion of the "event". Once I listen to someone prove full of it regarding that aspect, I quit listening, as life is too short, and the internet is too large.

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk

    “Sky High” is a great song. I also very much like the band Chicago, for example, “25 or 6 to 4.”

    BTW, my implied criticism of Jimmy Buffett was only implied, and what I really was saying was that I don’t know his work much other than “Margaritaville.” (Then I remembered “Cheeseburger in Paradise,” and I thought, well, maybe I’m not wrong…)

    Your example of his ex-pat song is very good, though. I must admit. Thanks.

    • Replies: @Dmon
    @Buzz Mohawk

    I can take or leave most of Jimmy Buffet's songs, but he definitely had the best song titles : "Weather's Here, Wish You Were Beautiful", "If The Phone Doesn't Ring It's Me". And of course,
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL9O0B0gzZE

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

  • You pre-drink appetizer: Bowie, Maryland is 55% black. Washington DC is a short 35 minutes away, and is a 48% black city. Remember this as we present you your shot and chaser. And, it's vital you understand the state of Maryland is 33% black. Okay, how about a shot or two? Ready? Shot. [Six Flags...
  • @possumman
    Six Flags in PG Co. MD started out as a wild animal park-back in the 70s--Called Wild World --one of my buddies had a job there as an elephant trainer. Apparently after it became a regular amusement park the local yutes decided to turn it back into a wild animal park. We took the kids there many years ago--before it turned back into a zoo. PG Co is a a mess--nearby Montgomery Co is a mess too but its mostly Hispanic gangs and illegals infesting that.

    Replies: @Lancelot_Link

    I have memories of that a a small child, earliest kinda memories. I think it became a water park after that, I think I remember a drowning in the wave pool in the 80’s.

    Remember when Bowie was white? Lol

  • The only hope to save ourselves from Trump’s authoritarianism is mass movements. We must build alternative centers of power — including political parties, media, labor unions and universities — to give a voice and agency to those who have been disempowered by our two ruling parties, especially the working class and working poor. We must...
  • @meamjojo

    "The only hope to save ourselves from Trump’s authoritarianism is mass movements. We must build alternative centers of power — including political parties, media, labor unions and universities — to give a voice and agency to those who have been disempowered by our two ruling parties, especially the working class and working poor."
     
    AI will eliminate all government, all politicians and all money. Everything will be free. Humans can create or watch sports all day or get wasted all day or combine the above.

    But anyone like Hedges who stirs up trouble will be off to the Soylent Green tanks.

    Replies: @Tennessee Jed

    Are Soylent Green tanks anything like gas chambers?

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    LOL! cause "farting up a storm". Yes, the perfect storm.

    OTOH, I gotta say, even I'm a little put out by this obvious display of your inherent Settlerism, Mr. Dmon. I'll have you know that the Indigenous People were extremely environmentally conscious. The particular Indigenous Peoples who had conquered the Great Plains during the time in question used every part of the Ta'Tonka, that which you erroneously call the "Buffalo". Along with the hide, the meat, and the bones, they made use of the farts too. Fart jerky, fart gumbo, deep-fried Ta'Tonka farts... you name it... nothing was wasted.

    Mother Gaia was much pleased. She rewarded The People with horses, rifles, and casinos.

    Replies: @Dmon

    Mother Gaia continues to show her favor to The Human Beings by punishing those who would steal the bounty from her people and sell Buffalo fart products without paying royalties.

    https://www.thestreet.com/restaurants/creditsafe-flags-chapter-11-bankruptcy-risk-for-beyond-meat

    Analyst: Beyond Meat faces Chapter 11 bankruptcy as cash dwindles

    • LOL: kaganovitch
    • Replies: @epebble
    @Dmon

    Mother Gaia continues to show her favor to The Human Beings by punishing those who would steal the bounty from her people

    Beyond Meat was over $200 in 2019. Now it is less than $2. TESLA Shareholders, take note.

  • World War II was the most colossal military conflict in all of human history, and the shaping event of our modern world. As a consequence, over the last eighty years it has become the subject of hundreds of thousands of books and articles written in English, and an equally vast outpouring of electronic media content...
  • @Odyssey
    Almost everyone overlooks that Germany did not lose World War I, but rather that the result was a draw and that November 11th is Armistice Day, not Victory Day.

    Only Serbia had no reason to celebrate that day, since they not only won a victory (a Pyrrhic victory, in fact), broke through the Southern (Salonika) front (in which the Allies had held Serbian soldiers back for a couple of years and did not allow them to move from the island of Corfu, nor did they want to give them weapons), liberated the entire Serbia (and future Yugoslavia) in about 12 days, fought hand-to-hand battles while running, and continued its battle path towards Berlin until the Allies stopped them again in Austria.

    The Serbian victory directly caused (1) the abdication of the German Kaiser (the paradox is that the Kaiser belonged to the Hohenzollern dynasty of Prussian kings and dukes [of Serbian origins] that had ruled Prussia and Branibor [Brandenburg] for 500 years), (2) breaking of the three empires (AH, Bulgarian and German) and (3) the final end of World War I.

    Replies: @※

    Almost everyone overlooks that Germany did not lose World War I, but rather that the result was a draw and that November 11th is Armistice Day, not Victory Day.

    Have you read the terms of that armistice?

    Have you read the terms of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles?

    If those were the results of a German draw, then the 1871 Armistice of Versailles and Treaty of Frankfurt were the results of a French win in comparison.

    • Agree: Hartmann
  • Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link Jason Farago, who appears to be a Deep State propagandist and pro-UkroNazi culture warrior, just published a New York Times interactive photo-video piece headlined “How Lunar Photography Brought the Heavens Down to Earth.” Farago celebrates the alleged artistic genius of the Apollo moon photos, viewing them...
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @roonaldo

    There's a lot riding on the Apollo Moon hoax not being exposed - because it leads to ZOG malfeasance.
    So to that end, they've invested large sums of money in:

    1) Producing videos on You Tube (naturally confirming the official narrative)

    2) Funding countless authors who wrote books where they [allegedly] debunked the debunkers.
    (Take the Holohoax fable for example, where the number of books featuring sob stories about the tragedy the Jews endured outnumber the factual output of the revisionists by 100 to 1 or more).
    So too is the case with the Moon hoax - where ZOG approved videos outnumber those from the genuine truth seekers.

    3) Paying off all manner of corrupt 'experts' (all wearing a lab coat and carrying a clipboard - so they appear intelligent), to say that the official [ZOG dictated] account of how the Apollo missions were portrayed in the ZOG owned media over the last 50 years, is correct.

    And, I suppose it all appears superficially plausible - at least to a nitwit like you Ronaldo.
    Anyway, stick to your fantasy beliefs about the Apollo project.
    You can keep treasuring your collection of moon toys (that you assembled from your cereal packets of Fruit Loops as a kid).

    And let's not forget that signed photo portrait you have in your bedroom featuring Buzz 'Lightyear' Aldrin that you so admire.
    Just leave the genuine investigations to the adults in the room.

    Replies: @roonaldo

    Couldn’t do it, could ya–visit the website I mentioned and learn something, let alone refute any of their presentations.

    Your moniker isn’t apt, TV.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @roonaldo


    Couldn’t do it, could ya–visit the website I mentioned and learn something, let alone refute any of their presentations.
     
    Of course he couldn't. You and I could read what Bart Sibrel or Dave McGowan have written about the so-called "Moon Hoax". I have. You probably have too. But morons like "Truth Vigilante" don't want to know - they want to believe. So they won't touch anything that might dispel their notions. Not that they would understand much of it anyway, as they are obviously not too bright.

    The Moon Hoax is TV's security blanket. As somebody who is highly sub-mediocre, it comforts him to believe that nobody in the past ever achieved anything of note.
    , @Truth Vigilante
    @roonaldo


    Couldn’t do it, could ya–visit the website I mentioned and learn something
     
    You know, I hear that all the time.
    You Moon Hoaxers (and let this be clear, 'Moon Hoaxer'= those niwits that fell for this ZOG orchestrated hoax), ask us to look at their ZOG funded/authorised videos/read their books etc, but THEY NEVER TAKE THE TIME TO INVEST EVEN A FEW MINUTES in monumental achievements of investigatory research, like Massimo Mazzucco's* masterpiece 'American Moon'.

    (*Yes, the same Massimo Mazzucco that produced the legendary 'September 11: the New Pearl Harbour' - the benchmark in 9/11 documentaries).
    That's right, the same documentary that ZOG owned/controlled Jew Tube have throttled the hell out of by way of algorithms and other chicanery, to ensure as few people as possible see it.
    It's the same documentary that quickly reached a million or more views soon after its release, then a few months later the view count is down in the scores of thousands.

    This has occurred on countless occasions.
    You see, when the view count surges, Jew Tube take down Mazzucco's film.
    Then, a 9/11 truther puts it back up. The view count builds up again and Jew Tube take it down once more. Wash, Rinse, Repeat.
    That's their standard M.O with anything they don't want the citizenry to watch.

    And so it was with Mazzucco's 'American Moon', which has likewise had its views throttled.
    But, in fairness to the nitwits that side with ZOG in believing that Men Walked on the Moon, Mazzucco's Moon film is three and half hours long - whereas the Sept 11 Pearl Harbour doco is nearly FIVE hours long.

    What I'm getting it is that, for the typical fool who believes that men Walked On the Moon, these individuals are:

    NOT WELL READ - many of them are semi literate.
    Additionally, the overwhelming bulk of them are VERY LAZY.
    The bulk of what they know on ANY subject is what they've gleaned from 30 sec sound bytes, from slogans and from bumper stickers.
     
    I'd be flattering them to say they were merely halfwits.
    But that's where I come in. That's why I should be called 'The Facilitator'.
    That's because I LIGHTEN THE LOAD, I actually help the dumbed down Moon hoaxers JOIN THE DOTS to be abke to draw the obvious conclusions.

    You see, for those of you that have seen me in the UR 9/11 threads, that have seen my word count (well into the six figure territory on this ONE subject alone)/links to articles/videos etc, there is no other 9/11 documentary that I have referenced more than Mazzucco's 'Sept. 11: the New Pearl Harbour'.

    And, knowing that the Moon Hoaxer nitwits won't take the time to attempt watching the entirety of it, I actually reference certain few minute sections of it that demonstrate a particular point.
    Numerous UR participants (Ron Unz among them), have witnessed this.

    And, seeing as the ne'er-do-wells that stand shoulder to shoulder with ZOG in propagating the official narrative of the phony Apollo Monon Missions, I will do likewise again here.
    Because I'm a nice guy.
    And despite the slings and arrows hurled in my direction by these rabid hyenas, I will ignore that and assist them in their journey of discovery.

    Now, in relation Mazzucco's 'American Moon', I see so many comments here making it out like it ONLY focuses on the photographic anomalies of those fake moon missions.
    And, although it does allocate quite a significant fraction of the three and a half hours to that matter, there is much, MUCH more to this landmark documentary than that.

    So with that in mind, I ask the UR readers to scroll up to my brief comment # 157, and watch the 7 min section I've specified there.
    (That's right you Moon Hoaxers - it's only SEVEN EFF'N MINUTES. So hopefully you won't go into 'information overload mode' as you're known to do).

    That section deals with the reaction of the Apollo 11 astro-frauds at the Press Conference convened in Sept. 1969, more than a month after they returned from doing a few laps in Low Earth Orbit.

    Watch the body language of Armstrong and Buzz 'Lightyear' Aldrin in particular.
    They had just been pivotal figures in the [alleged] GREATEST TECHNOLOGICAL ACHIEVEMENT (either before or since) in human history.
    One would've expected them to be BURSTING WITH EUPHORIA.

    But UR readers, what do you see? I've seen happier faces at an EFF'N FUNERAL.
    And Ron Unz** NEVER ADDRESSES THIS.
    Why are they behaving that way?
    Why does Aldrin fidget nervously with his pen throughout the whole ordeal?
    Look at the EFF'N EXPRESSION on Armstrong's face for the whole time.

    Summary: Of course these are/were individuals with some integrity. They KNOW that they're participating in an IMMENSE FRAUD - and they can't hide their emotions.

    This is just the beginning UR readers.
    This comment has been long enough already, so I will finish up in a moment.
    But many of my future comments in this thread will be short excerpts from Mazzuccos doco.
    EACH OF THOSE will, at a minimum, raise serious doubts about the official narrative - and many will single handedly eviscerate the juvenile notion that Men Walked on the Moon.

    But collectively they will prove emphatically that the Apollo Moon Missions were a monumental fraud - a fraud that only a gullible On-The-Spectrum retard would swallow (much like the similarly minded Greta Thunberg swallowed the Anthropogenic Global Warming nonsense).
     
    (**Seeing as Ron Unz will likely avoid addressing why the Apollo 11 crew are so downcast at that Press Conference, I await the responses from the ZOG aligned Moon Hoaxers. Let's see what convoluted explanation they come up with).

    This should be fun.
    I'm prepared for the belly laughs that will result as they try to dig their way out of this cavernous hole they're in.
  • Author’s note: The caption “Entartete Musik” featured on this and other images means “degenerate music.” This along with greater condemnations of degenerate art were a prominent platform position of a certain political movement in the past. Some readers may recognize the stylized lettering from a certain progpaganda poster as well. The cultural milieu any individual...
  • @notanonymoushere
    @Sparkon


    I can’t stop you from fantasizing about my late mom, but that makes you a necrophiliac.
     
    So you're on board with my whole "dig her up and fuck her to death again" plan? Of course I'd have to work with the grand kids' schedule, they shouldn't have to miss it again.

    Replies: @Trinity

    I thought good ole Sparky was a troll but now I know he/she/it is……..

    • Replies: @Sparkon
    @Trinity


    I thought good ole Sparky was a troll but now I know he/she/it is……..
     
    The pot calls the teacup black,

    You and notanon really got all shook up by my comments about music the double standard, and Identity Politics, didn't you? And now you're both whirling around in the mosh pits of your minds seeing just how low you can go in the race to the bottom.

    Squirm on, dude.
  • Most Zohran Mamdani voters loathe Nick Fuentes. Fuentes’ groypers aren’t big fans of Mamdani, either. But if “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” the two no-longer-marginalized figures, and their followers, ought to be friends. Mamdani’s election as mayor of New York, and Fuentes’ almost simultaneous entry into the mainstream conversation, are not unrelated....
  • @Priss Factor
    A Muslim Mayor of NY who says he will arrest Bibi Netanyahu if he visits.

    The saddest thing about the whole affair is some 'brown' guy has bigger balls than virtually all the white male candidates who, like Lindsey Graham and Mike Johnson, are dog-whores of Netanyahu.
    And Mr. Tough Guy Trump was in the Knesset praising Adelson for loving Israel more than the US. Yeah, that's what America First is all about.

    Whites love to take pride in their liberty and dignity. "Unlike browns who are servile by nature, we whites love freedom."

    ROTFL. Looks like 'browns' have more dignity and courage and love freedom more in the face of Zionist tyranny. Meanwhile, whites are the biggest brown-nosing losers groveling at the feet of Zion.

    Replies: @ServesyouallWhite, @Same old same old

    The saddest thing about the whole affair is some ‘brown’ guy has bigger balls than virtually all the white male candidates

    WTF are you talking about? Mamdumbass is just as sackless as the white men. He has only talked at this point. Something unwashed pajeets do CONTINUALLY.

    • Agree: David Parker
  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • I don’t know how far this unspellable foreign Moslem Commie will really get with his programmes in NYC, but this kind of thing only hits home when you come home. Watch this scene, and see what I mean, say in my post Bolshevik Zohran Kwame Mamdani on seizing the means of habitation.

    You’ve got to go to the post for Lara’s Theme.

    .
    We’ve got a lot of artiste/literati types here, so I hope many of you will know the reference, having watched or even read Dr. Zhivago.

    • Replies: @Currdog73
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Always liked"Lara's Theme"brings back fond memories from watching the movie because the little redhead worked at the theater and I watched a lot of movies waiting for her to get off work.

    , @Buzz Mohawk
    @Achmed E. Newman

    David Lean ★★★★★

    , @Mr. Anon
    @Achmed E. Newman

    "Seizing the means of habitation"!

    I like it. The new People's Republic of New York City is going to give us lots of examples of means-seizing.

    Public supermarkets: Seizing the means of victualization.

    Revocation of public decency laws: Seizing the means of defecation.

    Public day-care: ????????????

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    , @Pericles
    @Achmed E. Newman

    If Mamdani really is a muslim communist, does that mean NYC has become the last redoubt of the Baath Party? (Anyone remember those guys? Secularist regimes patiently eradicated one by one and replaced by Islamists?)