excellent analysis. the castration anxiety of this indo-european backwash (lol an upstater) is indeed the problem that must be addressed, with a terrible sobriety.

holy shit i wonder what stupid dasein would say

lol “Frankfort”

because when i think of sheeny negative dialectics i certainly think of milton friedman, and henry schultz — and total flaming hebolas like henry george

glad to see steve finally a draw a line against the fascist paranoiac imbeciles that have infested his comment section. the kind of people who believe ukraine — or better yet, the spectral “azov battalion” — is methodically slaughtering thousands of its citizens in staged atrocities for pr purposes. the right has descended into absolute self-caricature.

russia has just coughed up 20 years of economic development in weeks, is going to suffer an apocalyptic brain drain, and is literally condemned to third-world pariah status for the pathetic remainder of putin’s term in power. they’re now little more than a degenerated police state — putin’s only remaining move is contraction.

and yet to every chump on team lick-his-balls, this is winning

russia has been using tochka missiles with cluster warheads repeatedly in the “police action,” lickspittle

the mechanism of trying to deny this stuff is the same as that utilized in holocaust denial.

these are all legitimate political weapons. russia is fully integrated into global commerce — only fools like the ones here (not russians themselves, who are not this stupid) think they represent anything like a lol “moral bulwark” against the west. russia is being shown its world insignificance, both as political entity and culture.

meanwhile, they can’t take fucking kharkiv without a mess — and they’re supposed to be some kind of world threat?

Blaming feminism is a cheap shot and explains nothing — and does it in the appropriate ways for this blog. If anything, the 80s were characterized by renascent christian moralism and reaction against feminism.

it’s incredible the kind of mileage unz troggs get out of notions such as “oh those are just the opinions of some urban slickster philly jew” when his central point is easily valid: most of the atavistic boomer right that reads this shitsite have almost no contact or knowledge with actual urban environments — you’re rancid flyover-burgers, in the main. you’d have no idea how to function in such an environment, and so lump you’re basic hardworking, fundamentally decent (albeit stupid) black from the risky variant, the way a real urbanite can.

you, meanwhile, are too stupid to understand that that lack of distinction is in fact systemic racism of a type

five minutes ago: conventional sailer and co wisdom states that “asians” etc are more racist than anyone else

now: asian immigrant castes aren’t racist, because it doesn’t exist — it’s just rationality

tfw “antisemitism exists” draws screeching antisemitic slur-denials from the unzetariat, presumably basting in their BO in their nazi-memorabolia cluttered “dens” (ie, garages) in their sub-suburban “compounds” (shithole ranchhouses deep in the flyover zone)

from what i heard they tended to write each other middle-eighths (in counterpoint), at least in the earlier periods. so the anxious i’ll be back gets a sentimental middle-eighth while the reflective things gets a confident and aggressive one.

totally. the semi-derivative “boy band” period this dude is weakly referencing (typified, i suppose, not by “i want to hold your hand” which rocks like hell, but by “she loves you”) lasts like five minutes. hard day’s night is literally full of complex arrangements, themes, chord progressions. it sounds completely different than anything heretofore regarded as “rock n roll.”

this is my favorite beatles’ period, what i like call the turtleneck beatles.

and that album is full of them (the original english release, which becomes two albums in north america). despite what comes later, these are the beatles songs, perfect, simple, and whole, that stick with me the most: things we said today, i’ll be back, i should have known better …

No I’m trolling pissing off you yt incels. A cursory glance at “sites” like these reveal that the dindoo and hebe live rent free in your basement dwelling, pornhub fanatic incel mind.

conveniently wrong, as usual (lately). as anyone who cares to think about it easily remembers, this shift in consciousness clearly took place during the reagan era — which was predicated on a systematic fuck-you directed at the bland, dutiful, mid-american protestant worker, and sought to reinvent america as essentially an economic enterprise.

and certainly not in the interest of any fancifully conceived american / christian-white “majority” either — but an emergent white corporate class which openly antagonized this former majority — legally and otherwise.

when the reagan-thatcherites started to chant their new mantra that “there is no such thing as social justice” they meant you, deplorowhites

who the fucks wants your gross, fentanyl-laced gentile blood, that smells like hot-pockets and off-brand energy drink?

your “core americans” sound a whole lot like post-48’er european rejects — condensed in the american south and midwest — who have withered off the vine

still awaiting a positive definition of these people — which might not even exist. if the goal was simple reaction — to keep things as they are — perhaps abstract legal rights and freedom of religion were not the way to go

meanwhile you’ve been lapped repeatedly by jews and your own, enlightened race traitors. the owl of minerva has taken flight and is shitting upon you

this relentless low-watt straw-manning you get from sailer now might work better if we were ever offered some positive definition of “core” americans, which is used lazily as a default cateogory signifying, presumably, virtue.

what, exactly, is supposed to be virtuous about these people? home-ownership? how about home-flipping? owning big work trucks not actually used for work? bogus christianity? simple, uncultured, suburban nimbyism?

it’s pretty easy to stereotype cluster-b urban shitlibs, isn’t it? but isn’t the substantial stereotype of the “core” american that of the post-war republican chamber-of-commerce country clubber? these people who dominated “core” american life until ten minutes ago? people who were wildly pro-immigration for selfish ends? wildly pro-corporate? wildly cynical about their own blatantly rationalistic “ethical” supports, eg, “ownership society” “supply-side econ,” mass-market religion?

seems this “core” american can be pretty neatly summed as a karen of ressentiment

what life was like before the arrival of ye murderous rape-thief R1b’s:

‘These settlements underwent periodical acts of destruction and re-creation, as they were burned and then rebuilt every 60–80 years. Some scholars[who?] have theorised that the inhabitants of these settlements believed that every house symbolised an organic, almost living, entity. Each house, including its ceramic vases, ovens, figurines and innumerable objects made of perishable materials, shared the same circle of life, and all of the buildings in the settlement were physically linked together as a larger symbolic entity. As with living beings, the settlements may have been seen as also having a life cycle of death and rebirth’

the culture complex is called ‘Cucuteni–Trypillia’ if any of you are interested, though i’m assuming this is a null set.

it’s really funny when smart guys like steve sailer — who seem to otherwise imply extremely powerful causal links between genes and behavior — all of a sudden, quite conveniently, seem to “forget” that they’re talking about completely different people here (than roving murderous steppe ilks, ie, your ancestors), living within a completely different cultural-behavioral complex

ah the poor whites, too noble for this world, dropping dead at the murphy table as the mike cernovich podcast drones on in the background.

ah chipotle-ranch! ah humanity!

it’s a sophisticated building, you already dead and replaced whites just don’t get the concept

never mind chauvin — how many steve sailers are there anyway?

GoT was awesome because it was violent and horny af. it deteriorated considerably when it kept straining to be an “epic.” this stuff — especially foundation — looks awfully ponderous, bloated, and ultra-woke

how many chauvins are there anyway????

isteve readers flying their rubeflags proudly, apparently unable to viddy the concept of a “family-style” throwback redsauce restaurant that serves gigantic portions to their elephantine tourist clientele

no actual NYCer eats here or, indeed, at any place you would, on your twice-a-decade “business trip”

enjoy your gourmet lunch of sonic cheezeburger slavered in chipotle-ranch mayo

all the deflection and snark in the world doesn’t change what kind of burgerbrained imbecile you have to be to suck horse deworming paste out of a tube and think this makes you wise.

if this is “white” american civilization in 2021, wtf wants it?

yeah “plan B” — be a paranoid-psychotic dumbass ameriburger

qanon is a distillate of the white American paranoid-reactionary consciousness. I call bullshit on sailer’s claim that he dindu muffin — also on the ridiculous claim that it’s a male phenomenon.

if anything, the participation of American women indicates the masculinization of behavior on America — as typified by squat shrieking rage Karens like MTG

outstanding

it’s almost as if dysgenic yamnaya backwash like ‘anglin’ and the ilks represented here are somehow genetically predisposed to be grifted

lol yeah ok. jews in the ancient world were a fierce warrior-aristocracy who gave a giant fuck you to the roman empire at the height of its power (at a time when its own elite were deeply hellenized). jews comprise 20% of nobel prize winners. notable ugly jews would include:
kirk douglas
harrison ford
paul newman
william shatner
daniel day lewis
scarlet johannsen
natalie portman
eva green
rachel wiesz
mila kunis
winona ryder
ellen barkin

this whole formulation is conspicuously mid-witted. if we’re talking about modern state bureaucracies they’re virtually identical with the idea of the modern liberal state: politically neutral and concerned above all with their own self-perpetuation (see weber, politics as a vocation). thus their main ideological commitment is to the status-quo, which is why they’d regard the unstable orange imbecile as a plague.

if we’re talking about political organizations, they’re in fact deeply anti-democratic and all tend to compact, oligarchical ideological rule (see quasi-fascist robert michels).

if we’re talking about private-sector bureaucracy, one would imagine it’d go without saying that they’re constitutionally liberal and thus politically neutral — concerned only with profit and favorable regulatory regimes.

so we’re left with the cops and the grunts, who are said to be constitutionally right-wing heh. let’s roundly assume this means: too stupid for the private sector, fetishistic relationship with violence, naive notions about morality, etc. (except for that 30% at the top of the hierarchy, the brass, who are quite politically minded and resemble any other entrenched political bureaucracy.)

lol because right-wingers could never merely be big talkers

‘I only heard the term within the last year, probably from you first.’

— the plaintive cry of the enfeebled moron boomer

a standardized ameriwhite can be made to understand anything, provided it is blamed on the juifs

theodor adorno and his good fren, max horkheimer

sailer must be eating a little too much white cake lately, fuzzying up his socal brain, if he thinks ‘tall, skinny, white guys’ are eschewing football. the biggest entries in the QB elite last year would be (unequivocally) justin herbert and (maybe) joe burrow. and this year took it to another level, with serious white-boy-summer posterboys mac jones and zach wilson, and the whiteking heir-apparent himself, trev lawrence