– mysimplepsuedonym
Presuming to claim I only claimed to have protested is unproductive and misplaced energy and otherwise nonsense fronting. I stated a fact not a claim’regardless of your claiming a claim. I only noted my protest action type as in the streets in applying personal experience of Ted’s priniciple, which you assumed is all I’ve done. It should be obvious I’ve protested not only as described but by other form as that is how I was able to note other forms in my post, moreover forty of the nearly sixty I’ve been alive. Your notes on insurance and big pharma misses a core which is insurance in the first place has become a con. As to new world order when Reagan did his ‘new world order’ speech I sent notes on that to others. That is how long I’ve been at it. To further show the mistake of assuming, another missed core, you complain ‘you’ meaning me ‘won’t be able to reproduce’ etc and in so doing miss the other half of the reason for the problems which is people over the last century having been more concerned with reproducing than stopping the tyranny in our faces, first. Here again, I did not reproduce though could have -because I saw the problems and made effort while others didn’t. Back to insurance, you note forced insurance but what did you do about it, personal action, beside talk. – At the time of the mandate beside posting web comments and sending notes to people I know I also stopped paying insurance which if others had read the nonsense law they left a loophole wherein they would not fine those who didn’t sign on or otherwise buy insurance. If everyone had done it the medical pharma insurance complex may have gotten the message and we could have had some sort of honest trade.
Those are only a tiny fraction of examples of focuses and action, add to that war protest, opposing’gmo’ food and plants, tort reform, immigration, the mass garbage and poluting of the planet, the false zero-down mortgages going on after the repeal of Glass Steagal, which twelve years later and ten years ago I was then in the streets protesting about the ‘bailouts’ from, and where were you by the way. Here’s your assuming claiming claim back.
Having said that in response to your assuming response to my post, and we will be clear my response here is to your untoward response, that aside, in primary of the serious situations of course some of your other points otherwise are worth considering. Your listing some of the gross situations we are facing and moreover with some strength about it, many should know by now, and requires effort if there is any chance of a future other than slavery as you note and as noted in my original post. Doubting people will snap out of it in time but maybe some may figure out there’s only one way and that’s making effort. And to that thanks again for your article Ted.

edit, fourth line from bottom- telling you what their taxes are.

The article addresses such a gap in thinking, have long sorted the difference between posing and reality, people claim to be well meaning but don’t walk the direction, feet crossing ground to make a future something other than dim slavery. A little debate, the note of 03′ Iraq protests not making a difference, and comparing to blm and numbers, I didn’t believe the blm numbers they put out, also the Iraq protests were about twelve million around the world, about 2 million here, and were blacked out by media, something to think about. Though a point also, it really doesn’t matter what media does, if what we do is about other people, protesting so people see regardless of media. .
I think some have sense of paralysis because only think we have a couple choices of things can do when there are more, for instance can write short notes to people we know, or put sign in yard, or sticker on car etc. And protesting, have done it more than once, have a photo at occupy protest in Seattle in 2010 on heels of ‘bailouts’. Though weren’t as many people as should have been It was the best hours I have spent to be around others who were alive, as so many selfish dumbs sat back, suckered by ‘house value’ nonsense which you have no house if you have no freedom and a bunch of tyrants are telling what you taxes are. Now, here we are again only worse exactly as I said would happen over ten years ago. Also protested for gmo food labels, another that went nowhere because not enough people protested. Enjoy that pharmed phish. In any case appreciate the article Ted, hope others do also, lot of points.

~ May be time to think consequences, mining gold poison, lakes of cyanide. The only place gold belongs is in teeth, which if that’s was only use could be mined differently for small use, but as some trade has to stop, created hoarding and false focus, false life. As many in history have seen from ignoring what matters. Sharing and focus with others, was replaced by hoarding. Error.

Clean food water, natural earth life that could continue infinity, not overpopulating, not allowing tyrants, are the basics, and none of those are on most people’s list. Now there is a mask on every face. Sharing more important than anything else. Not with everyone, but those with similar ideals, beyond same old people, small bubble. Sharing is what people should think of as value instead of gold. Sharing info knowlege, energy, food, whatever.

That said, article makes points, second paragraph or sentence and few other parts. Eyes need to see. Thanks.

.

-hi Jim, may advance a little more debate, the word connotations have been driven as pejorative, though, then consider the word illegal or legal, and monopolies, amazon, paid little tax, microsoft gates puts all his shares in foundation and does a bunch of vaxxing, false wars without required act of congress, a million of these examples, yet, not called conspiracy because made legal, by conspirators, corporatists.
So when you say business by two people, I could argue it is a conspiracy, regardless good or bad, because I don’t fully follow govt or social steering which includes language. To further, your example of word cooperation, we’re trained to see one way and is phonetically softer, whereas, conspiracy phonetically lends itself to harder meaning, though if we choose, can change meanings of words by using them differently.

The word cooperation, could also be conspiratorial, again depends on who’s calling what, what, to suit purposes. The govt doesn’t call excluding whites from special handouts racism, they call it ‘affirmative action’. I argue that the same way social steer-ers twist things, we can twist or untwist things also, for our purposes, and in de-fanging the word conspiracy, which is only used to put down truthers, there are other words we can use to define groupism negative, gangs, collusion, big pharma media cooperation, cabals etc.
Main argument is, free to define language for ourselves. It’s the most basic thing in thinking, determine how we communicate. Language matters, which to me includes some self chosen defining.
Just thought to advance some arguments. Appreciate your efforts Jim.

Yet, could be seen as the effect of conditioning, as people have been trained to sit for false wars, killing for oil etc, and gore violent ‘movies’, that should never should have been accepted by the mass, the same time trained not to even ‘speak’ certain words, or ‘disobey’ the ‘law’ whatever that means. Point being, can be a good idea to step way back from the training, and envision life five thousand years ago, before any of this. When needed, violence was natural, and the controller types know that, so over time made systems of dependency, govmnt, police, fire, etc and people fell in, juvenile, not natural for real grown adults.

For instance an interest in restructure thinking, mental re-orienting, to not associate word with assumed meaning, may be thinking in steps, such as kill the tv, or radio, so applies to things around us, our own lives. Or of self movement, communicating, such as kill the talk of the jabberers propaganda, by sharing info ourselves, etc. A lot of ways to use the word, if nothing else to begin rethinking how we think, how did we get to where the word kill seems bad, only for us, but not for certain others. Thought retraining is healthy.