Blacks are setup to hate whites by the mass media, it was not always like that. Most blacks looked up to whites as problem solvers. Thé intrigants that run our societies nowadays use blacks as social cannon further by brainwashing them in state sponsored hate. Racism is a pro socialist revolutionary tool used by those who control the state. Race realism and outcome by difference in productivity related to social Darwinism is indisputable. Socialism denies group and race differences in productivity , which is scientifically proven to exist. The socialist solution for this is eugenics in an distributional environment until it lasts, in as it will not be stable and leads to economic collapse . Reward according to personal production level is essential ,the full or partial
abolishment of this principle in socialist schemes makes total society much less productive and unable to compete with foreign competition (Germans,Chinese,Russians etc.) . The inability of the USA to compete with other nations can be found in its socialist structures and the politisization of science and economy for the sake of empire. The effort of the CIA and deep state is in creating equally worse political socialist conditions as in the USA all around the world, so it can compete again.

Blacks are setup to hate whites by the mass media, it was not always like that. Most blacks looked up to whites as problem solvers. Thé intrigants that run our societies nowadays use blacks as social cannon further by brainwashing them in state sponsored hate. Racism is a pro socialist revolutionary tool used by those who control the state. Race realism and outcome by difference in productivity related to social Darwinism is indisputable. Socialism denies group and race differences in productivity , which is scientifically proven to exist. The socialist solution for this is eugenics in an distributional environment until it lasts, in as it will not be stable and leads to economic collapse . Reward according to personal production level is essential ,the full or partial
abolishment of this principle in socialist schemes makes total society much less productive and unable to compete with foreign competition (Germans,Chinese,Russians etc.) . The inability of the USA to compete with other nations can be found in its socialist structures and the politisization of science and economy for the sake of empire. The effort of the CIA and deep state is in creating equally worse political socialist and racial conditions as in the USA all around the world, so it can compete again.

Libertarian donors? It should read socialist or liberal donors. Another effort to smear libertarianism!

I wonder how the numbers would be if you would further differentiate towards IQ , race and crime. Are low IQ white males more crime- likely than high IQ? And does a higher level IQ in blacks, lower their crime incidence?
I have a hypothesis that crime could as well be based in the inability to estimate risk of consequence. Secondly the inability to get out the hands of the police and cover-up. Both are likely be better mastered by intelligent people. Third reason : the only way to get a lot of money without "brains" is to go into a career of crime. There is a coupling between black race and IQ, so IQ could be the driving factor.

I copied the following from the Wikipedia about Tutsi's. It shows much better school results for Tutsis's than for Hutu's. So it could support difference in IQ. If the Belgian rulers classified the people according to economic success this is a further indication of IQ difference.
"During the 1980s, school principals reported that, although secondary school admissions were proportional to the groups within the country and were made by competition within ethnic groups (in accordance with quotas mandated by the Habyarimana government), the students of Tutsi origin (14% of intake) comprised nearly 50% of graduates, on average. This report provoked accusations of tribal favoritism"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tutsi

Perhaps there is something like IQ in the problem.I wonder if there is a difference in IQ between Tutsi and Hutu. I think Tutsi's have higher IQ's , the reason they were choosen by the Belgians to continue to run the country, while under their rule. There must have been IQ test in the colonies as well. Are the results of these test in our eyes "political incorrect"?
Nobody ever mentions these aspects.
Anyway I think if there is low IQ under a leading class , development is hampered. If Tutsi's are more intelligent they would be the natural leaders. Perhaps the Hutu Tutsi separation is more visible in IQ tests than in anything else. Then the Hutu Tutsi civil war would be a war where low IQ people revolted against there high IQ masters.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations
There is a map in this wiki page, where Ghana is markedly more intelligent on average than its neighbours. It is better developed and politically more stable. The same with Uganda.